Is that why you sent him your picture???

Excellent point about spreading AIDS. And let’s not forget that they also have high incidents of many other STDs.

I agree with you completely, as always. Instead of trying to push their lifestyle down our throats, why don’t they just go back to the closet? It’s not like their lifestyle should be emulated or revered in any way. I am aghast that straight liberals encourage them to act out their gay-pride parades in various cities throughout the world, as if their lifestyle should be celebrated. Their lifestyle is not equal to ours. It’s an inferior lifestyle.

I feel sorry for them for being gay, but if they keep their lives private and away from the media they can live their gay lifestyles without hindrance. But it’s not what they are after. They are after homo-sexualizing the culture. That was my point to Rick. If their lifestyle truly had no effect on us, many of us wouldn’t say anything. However, because their activities pose a danger to society and humanity, we need to speak out. That’s why I’m not referring to it as gay marriage anymore. I am calling it gay sex. Gay marriage is just the next step. It’s gay sex that has entered the mainstream and accepted by society. Once gay sex became accepted, the logical trajectory is to accept gay marriage. That’s why making gay sex an accepted form of sex was the first step for gay activists, now gay marriage. It’s the next logical step for most people who can’t think logically and just follow the liberal media.

I’m not misogynist, I am a gender realist

I play a retard online, but I am a genius in real life !

well it is harmfull to others in a few ways

according to the very recent new numbers published by the CDC

86% of men who have HIV are gays

and most women contract HIV from bi-sexual men

so the gay lifestyle is making a lot of people sick with a deadly degenerative disease

ans some of those women transmit HIV to their newborn

but that is not all,

We also all pay a price in tax dollars for obvious reasons, health services, medical research etc etc…

they do harm others that is why I always say they should have stayed in the closet instead as opposed to where they are now;
in bathhouses where they have sex with 20 or 100 different men in one night and then infect a woman who infects her newborn

Fair enough, but all the arguments for gay marriage fall short, not the opposition to it. There isn’t a need for it if you are willing to admit that homosexual sex degrades societies. If indeed there wasn’t any harm in it, I wouldn’t be so against it. In fact, if it weren’t such a bad idea, gay activist wouldn’t need to do so much convincing. It hits people the wrong way subconsciously, without them really knowing why it’s a bad idea, just instinctively it feels wrong. I think most of us know deep down inside it’s not nature but nurture that causes it. That’s why the gay activists are able to convince the young in schools, as teens haven’t formed strong opinions yet and their sexuality isn’t firmly fixed yet.

Think about it this way, if gays admitted they weren’t born that way, but were somehow made gay along the way early in childhood, people wouldn’t accept them, especially their families. Their families would insist they seek help for their condition. The only way their lifestyle could be accepted without question by their friends and families is if it’s an accepted consensus that one is born gay, not made. That’s the only way to shut up their critics. That’s why I say their argument is transparent and dishonest.

“Look – if something were to happen to you right this second, do you have either a living will or regular will? I don’t-an lots of other people don’t as well.”

Exactly, so what do you think happens? That’s why members of the family might fight over who is the one to make the decisions. That’s why in all families it’s wise to designate your care giver, should something happens to you, not just gay people. Don’t you think regular families go through this too? To use this argument as the reason to change the definition of marriage is weak. Many states even allow gays to designate their pension beneficiaries their gay lovers. Some life insurance companies too. I think we can make such rules without changing the definition, since changing the definition is being pushed only so that homosexuality gets air time in school curriculums. I don’t see any reasons for it, other than to brainwash the minds of teens. Also, if a hospital is informed that one is gay and their lover is to make the decisions, the hospital is not going to say no.

The link to the Wikipedia article about animals displaying homosexual behavior is a total joke. C’mon, you can’t be serious. Look at the first sentence from that article, “there is documented evidence of homosexual or transgender behavior of one or more of the following kinds: sex, courtship, affection, pair bonding, or parenting.”

homosexual or transgender behavior in animals, are these people serious? transgender behavior??? So do animals understand the meaning of transgender?

Anyway, anyone can write a Wikipedia article, even gay activists trying to give their lifestyle “scientific” support.

If you are foolish enough to believe this Wikipedia article as truth, you’re a dupe. I recommend you wait to get more confirmation. Another study will show this is greatly exaggerated. For instance, playing between members of the same sex was skewed to show it was a mating dance. I don’t believe any of it at all. I think these are gay activists fishing for something that proves their lifestyle is “normal” and “natural” because it “exists” in the animal kingdom. Also, the people conducting these studies are probably trying to prove their beliefs. Most scientists are liberals so many studies on hot-button issues like homosexuality and global warming is very skewed to the left. So no, I am not convinced at all.

“Namecalling the sites I cited doesn’t accomplish anything for you.”

Completely the opposite, it does accomplish a lot. I like calling a spade a spade. I never take the word of gay activists as truth. They are nothing but liars, and dangerous ones at that – using deception to try to receive acceptance for their lifestyle. They need to be called out.

“And actually what other people do in their personal life is no concern to me as long as they are not acting in harmful ways -that meaning, if two gays or lesbians want to marry and live together and have the same rights as heterosexual couples, I am fine with that.”

I agree with you on this point if it were true, but it’s not the case. It does affect each and every one of us and this is how. If they simply wanted to get married and be done with it, fine. But we all know it’s not going to be the end of it. Their lifestyle would find its way to text books and school curriculum, as is happening in CA now. That’s not acceptable. In CA they’re already re-writing history to include someone was gay, even if just rumored. That includes many famous people from history who were rumored to be gay. So instead of focusing on their contributions , like a piece of music, art , or scientific discovery , now the text books include whole paragraphs on their supposed sexual preference. It’s not even fact, yet the crazy liberals in the CA school system seem to be obsessed with making sure kids knew about gay sex, how “normal” and how “good” it is. I am sorry but they are engaging in brainwashing and indoctrination, and all this is taking place when there isn’t any gay legislation yet. It seems gays can get married, as well as have their lifestyle taught in schools even before the Federal Government making it mandatory to be pushed on us. So your arguments about them not having any rights are false. They have plenty of rights; they just want to remove our right to disagree with their lifestyle. They’re pushing their lifestyle on us like the totalitarian intolerant lefty liberal bunch they are. No one is stopping them from their lifestyle if that’s what they want, yet they are forcing us to accept it as normal and anyone who disagrees with their lifestyle is going to be charged with hate speech if this legislation is adopted.

Just today I read that In the State of WA, the words husband and wife, bride and groom, are going to be removed from any reference of marriage Now, you tell me the gay lobby is NOT trying to force their lifestyle on us.

Why don’t you respond to whorefinder, he just commented in a new thread about homosexuality and says mostly the same things, just with lots of cussing.
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/11/28/feminist-fallacy-3-i-use-men-for-sex/#comment-390811

I suppose you would have to pay CH a lot of money for him to date you?…

If you are a multi millionaire and were to buy me lots of stuff such as houses , fast cars and boats,
oh yeah
and a grand piano

I would date you