Comments on: Indirect Vs Direct Vs Clever Openers: Which Is Best?

By: Adam

Adam — Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:22:49 +0000

This blog is a joke. Direct game is clearly more alpha and works. I know from experience and lookup people like David X. Plenty of people have success running direct game. [Heartiste: Hey man, don't j'accuse me! I agree with you. Well, mostly.]

By: Glengarry

Glengarry — Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:03:37 +0000

Yeah, though the bluffing, such as it is, can be pretty hardcore. Nothing like having a hysteric mess covered in her own blood showing up unannounced at 3 AM on a weekday.

(“Come in, I was just about to boil a bunny anyway.”)

By: Glengarry

Glengarry — Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:27:52 +0000

School nurthe.

By: Lightning Round – 2012/12/05 « Free Northerner

Lightning Round – 2012/12/05 « Free Northerner — Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:03:03 +0000

[...] guys for either sex or relationships. More Science: The dark triad gets girls. More Science: Which openers work. More Science: Sex and [...]

By: KidB

KidB — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:30:48 +0000

The study is obviously worthless. OF COURSE girls are going to say they prefer indirect openers. Girls would feel like sluts if they said they were more responsive to direct game. And girls never want to feel like sluts, even on an anonymous survey.

Heartiste wrote this:
Or it could simply be that direct openers automatically and instantaneously, by transparently communicating a man’s desire, lower his value vis-á-vis the girl he is hitting on

Nonsense.

Showing a sack of balls will do the very opposite of lower your value vis a vis the girl you’re hitting on. When you go direct, the aloof, devil may care shit eating grin must remain on your face at all times. The world is easy. The world is yours. You communicate to her that you’d like to take her out tonight, and your body language and tone of voice communites that you really aren’t sweating her answer either way.

The fact of the matter is this: when you go indirect, the girl knows what’s up. Your desire is being communicated just as it when you go dreict.. But what is also being communicated is that you don’t have a sack of balls.

Fortune favors the bold. Be Bold. Go direct.

By: KidB

KidB — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:12:44 +0000

The study is obviously worthless. OF COURSE girls are going to say they prefer indirect openers. They have their ASD on when they’re answering the survey questions, just as they do at all other times.

Heartiste wrote this: Or it could simply be that direct openers automatically and instantaneously, by transparently communicating a man’s desire, lower his value vis-á-vis the girl he is hitting on

Nonsense. Showing a sack of balls will do the very opposite of lower your value vis a vis the girl you’re hitting on. Again, you can’t be a nervous wreck.. When you go direct, the aloof, devil may care shit eating grin must remain on your face at all times. The world is easy. The world is yours. You communicate to her that you’d like to take her out tonight, and your body language and tone of voice communites that you really aren’t sweating her answer either way.

The fact of the matter is this: when you go indirect, the girl knows what’s up. Your desire is being communicated just as it when you go indreict.. But what is also being communicated is that you don’t have a sack of balls.

Fortune favors the bold. Go direct.

By: Afonso Henriques

Afonso Henriques — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:02:37 +0000

Very well said, Yareally

By: Afonso Henriques

Afonso Henriques — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:51:19 +0000

LGBF,

you have reinforced my Christian/Catholic tendencies.

By: Afonso Henriques

Afonso Henriques — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:23:49 +0000

I am no native english speaker.

And still, I revere GBFM.

If only the pain wasn’t so acute, I’d read all his posts.

By: stevejabba

stevejabba — Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:08:06 +0000

On the street. If you see a girl walking past you and go talk to her.

But don’t get caught up in it. It’s kind of a Keyboard jockey argument.