• Home
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Natural’s Dilemma
Why Don’t Fathers Teach Their Sons Well? »

The New Logo Of The West

December 12, 2012 by CH

django unchained

Share this:

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Goodbye America, The Id Monster | 351 Comments

351 Responses

  1. on December 12, 2012 at 2:10 pm AriGold

    Spot on.


    • on December 16, 2012 at 6:10 pm Lucky White Male

      Django groupies: Enjoy your masturbatory “revenge fantasies” while they last – closest you will get in reality.

      Whites are the Alpha. You are the Omega.

      It is what God preordained at the creation.

      And who are you bringing to this fight?

      A sex freak toe-sucker director : (http://gawker.com/5816417/the-quentin-tarantino-toe+sucking-sex-email-that-will-haunt-your-dreams)

      And a New York Jew producer with, in his words, a “Jewish fucking wet dream” :( http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/09/hollywoods-jewish-avenger/307619/)

      Carry on my White European descendants – while I smoke a very rich, and choice, cigar…


  2. on December 12, 2012 at 2:38 pm Blessent

    Brilliant.


  3. on December 12, 2012 at 2:39 pm josh

    What explains a guy like Tarantino? A completely soulless piece of shit. He could use his talents–such as they are–to oppose the plutocrats,but he much prefers sucking on their dicks. An omega weirdo who would never see a pussy except for the fact that his uber-nerd movie fascination and work ethic paid off in fame and money.

    [Heartiste: Tarantino is the racial equivalent of a cuckold fetishist. He has, as you hint, the soul of an omega male, and this psychosis is what drives him to acts of self-flagellation and glorification of what would be his tormentors in a state of nature.]


    • on December 12, 2012 at 3:23 pm corvinus

      From Wikipedia:

      Tarantino has been romantically linked with American actress Mira Sorvino,[30] directors Allison Anders and Sofia Coppola, actress Julie Dreyfus and comedians Kathy Griffin and Margaret Cho.[31]

      Sure, if you’re a Hollywood heavyweight, you can get dates… but did any of these women fall for him?

      There have also been rumors about his relationship with Uma Thurman, whom he has referred to as his “muse”.[32] However, Tarantino has stated that their relationship is strictly platonic.[33]

      It would seem that QT went all beta on Uma and she LJBFed him.

      Tarantino stated “I’m not saying that I’ll never get married or have a kid before I’m 60. But I’ve made a choice, so far, to go on this road alone. Because this is my time to make movies.”[34]

      So… there’s your answer. None of the women he has been “romantically linked with” fell for him hard enough to try to get him to marry them, or even impregnate them.


      • on December 12, 2012 at 3:30 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        It’s really hard to impregnate someone when you’re having sex with her feet.
        He’s a known foot fetishist. It’s not even a secret. And even if nobody told you, all you’d have to do is watch one of his movies. Every time there’s a female character on screen, you’re going to get a long, loving shot of her toes.


        • on December 12, 2012 at 4:11 pm Wilson

          He’s a phony, so he probably just came up with it as his “auteur” signature shot. I mean he could never have a tit fetish because that would be too…pedestrian.


          • on December 12, 2012 at 5:44 pm RappaccinisDaughter

            Supposedly it’s true. Unless he engineered this:
            http://www.nerve.com/news/love-sex/womans-leaked-email-chronicles-her-kinky-toe-sucking-night-with-quentin-tarantino

            I actually felt really bad for him when that thing came out.


            • on December 12, 2012 at 6:46 pm Tyrone

              A lot of women dig it. In fact most do.


            • on December 12, 2012 at 6:51 pm RappaccinisDaughter

              Well, can you blame us? Have you ever HAD a foot massage? They feel awesome. Especially if you’re a woman and you’re more or less expected to go through life wearing uncomfortable shoes. And you know a foot fetishist will rub those tootsies for you any old time you want. So what if he spends a couple of minutes doing it one-handed.


            • on December 12, 2012 at 9:56 pm Tyrone

              Sorry, I’m not that far along with it, but I enjoy caressing and massaging pretty women’s feet. Ugly feet on a woman are a big turn off for me.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 7:24 pm corvinus

              I’ve heard about Tarantino’s foot fetish, but I never really paid attention in movies, because I think of feet as something to be walked on and not seen. At any rate: ew.


          • on December 13, 2012 at 6:43 am retrophoebia

            Wilson, very nice, what you did there.


        • on December 12, 2012 at 4:26 pm Adam

          He likes curry-flavored toe jams.

          http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Tabloid/Indian-girl-spends-night-with-Quentin-Tarantino-tells-all/Article1-715167.aspx


          • on December 13, 2012 at 12:49 am Sp5

            That is one slutty Indian girl. Kind of pathetic that she says it’s the best story she’ll ever be able to tell.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 2:07 pm Hugh G. Rection

              Just shy of qualifying for the whorelympics. What a waste.


      • on December 12, 2012 at 4:28 pm Greg Eliot

        He seems to have that weird twinkle in his eye that is usually seen in homosexuals, so I was actually surprised to find out he (allegedly) isn’t one.

        http://www.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/20080905/300.tarantino.quentino.090508.jpg

        Also, queers invariably love to give the symbolic “Up Yours!” to the straight white crowd.


        • on December 12, 2012 at 5:07 pm corvinus

          He scores a 100% on Steve Sailer’s Google Gaydar, defined as “quentin tarantino g” bringing up “gay” as the first option in a Google search.


          • on December 12, 2012 at 5:26 pm Greg Eliot

            Strange, because it would be tough to keep it secret nowadays… and besides, what would be the point of staying in the closet? It certainly wouldn’t hurt his career.

            The only reason I can see it being kept under wraps is so that people wouldn’t just dismiss his cinematic scatology with a “Whaddya expect, from a fruit?”


            • on December 12, 2012 at 5:43 pm corvinus

              My guess is that, as the first few posters and Heartiste have suggested, he’s an omega, and fruits are simply omegas who decided to screw each other rather than ugly chicks. There’s a reason many omegas have a faggy vibe: they’re the feedstock for the homosexual population.

              If he became widely known as a gay, or even simply mocked as a closet fairy like Travolta and (to an extent) Tom Cruise, straight men would mock his movies rather than admire them for their gore and action. And I don’t think the industry wishes for his pro-black pro-Jew anti-white movies to be mocked.


            • on December 12, 2012 at 5:56 pm Greg Eliot

              So we’re in violent agreement, then.


            • on December 12, 2012 at 7:44 pm Canadian Friend

              Where is thwack to tell us this movie is more evidence we all live under a white supremacist system?


            • on December 13, 2012 at 6:45 am plumnuts

              always good to see grown men gossiping about who may or may not be gay


            • on December 13, 2012 at 12:36 pm Greg Eliot

              Since it would explain a lot of the whys and wherefores of the man’s work, it extends a bit deeper than mere “gossip”, tootsie.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 4:31 pm josh

            Interesting that u mention sailer,who has remarked on the so-called cinematic “Kick butt girls” as the fantasy of nerdy guys(like..guess who? Yep,QT himself) who want grrls to be kick-butt and also sexually interested in THEM. Obviously there is a similar thing going on with black males;somehow these nerds want to “vibe” off the BLACKS thuggishness,maybe theres a homosexual underpining to that. It should be said that lots of US are guilty of what I call zoo-seeking: Vouyerism of black violence and dysfunction. QT wallows in it.


        • on December 12, 2012 at 9:31 pm Jason

          Quentin Tarantino actually sat in front of me at a movie theater a few years ago. It was a bit surreal, seeing a movie with one of the medium’s top directors six feet ahead of me. He laughed really loud at really odd moments. He’s definitely twisted.

          BUT … he entered the theater with an entourage of six very attractive ladies … and bought them all popcorn.

          Weird foot fetishist, yes. Gay, no.


          • on December 12, 2012 at 9:42 pm Greg Eliot

            What straight man peacocks with an entourage of six hot women, sans bros, in an otherwise normal social setting?


            • on December 12, 2012 at 9:45 pm Greg Eliot

              And I bet they all giggled like geese when he pulled the old “have some of my popcorn” trick.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 2:23 pm Jason

              Hugh Hefner.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 4:26 pm Greg Eliot

              Hugh Hefner? Hanging out at the Playboy mansion or photo-op’ing at various events (which is not, as I (ahem) asked, a ‘normal’ social setting).

              Is that all you got?


          • on December 19, 2012 at 1:07 am Flom-Flom-Flooie

            Jules: Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa… stop right there. Eatin’ a bitch out, and givin’ a bitch a foot massage ain’t even the same fuckin’ thing.

            Vincent: It’s not. It’s the same ballpark.

            Jules: Ain’t no fuckin’ ballpark neither. Now look, maybe your method of massage differs from mine, but, you know, touchin’ his wife’s feet, and stickin’ your tongue in her Holiest of Holies, ain’t the same fuckin’ ballpark, it ain’t the same league, it ain’t even the same fuckin’ sport. Look, foot massages don’t mean shit.

            Vincent: Have you ever given a foot massage?

            Jules: [scoffs] Don’t be tellin’ me about foot massages. I’m the foot fuckin’ master.


      • on December 13, 2012 at 8:29 pm John O.

        @corvinus

        Tarantino stated “I’m not saying that I’ll never get married or have a kid before I’m 60. But I’ve made a choice, so far, to go on this road alone. Because this is my time to make movies.”[34]

        So… there’s your answer. None of the women he has been “romantically linked with” fell for him hard enough to try to get him to marry them, or even impregnate them.

        Or maybe HE didn’t fall hard enough?


    • on December 12, 2012 at 5:14 pm Zombie Shane

      The Frankfurt School Jews who run Hollyweird wouldn’t let a Tarantino movie see the light of day if it showed a traditional American white guy in a positive light.

      Even way back in 1994, Pulp Fiction’s bad guys were a bunch of working-class LEOs and small businessmen who secretly maintained a “Deliverance” style dungeon of horrors.

      BTW, note that the “cool” guy in Pulp Fiction, John Travolta, and the “cool” guy in Deliverance, Burt Reynolds, both turned out to be flaming faggots in real life.

      And do not for a second think that any of this is a mistake on the part of Hollyweird Jewry – those filthy yids know EXACTLY what they’re doing in shoving all of this poison down the throats of our womynz and childrenz.

      PS: If you want to hear from some real life working-class LEOs, then spend a little time at Second City Cop – it’s one of the most fascinating reads on the internet.


      • on December 12, 2012 at 7:03 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        The “cool guy” in Pulp Fiction was the Willis character…a traditionally masculine, working-class white man. And he has the best line in the film: “Zed’s dead, baby. Zed’s dead.”

        I don’t get all this anti-Semitism. What kind of a problem could you possibly have with a traditional, family-oriented, racially intelligent (Ashkenazi Jews have an average IQ of 115…that means the “dumb ones” have IQs of 100), and hard-working population? One that values the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake?


        • on December 13, 2012 at 5:19 pm Greg Eliot

          Those aren’t the ones we have a problem with, sugar britches… so long as they’re not trying to upend our nation or corrupt our people.

          Do try to pay attention, there’s a good girl.


      • on December 12, 2012 at 8:19 pm Zombie Shane

        i just realized that that coon, Jamie Foxx, is the same guy who was all Thank God, and our lord and savior, Barack Obama! at the Soul Train Awards a few days ago.

        When he said it, that damned jigaboo knew exactly what he had just finished filming for Tarantino, and what was about to be released in theaters nationwide.

        These jews like Weinstein are trying to start a race war in this country.


        • on December 12, 2012 at 8:27 pm Canadian Friend

          The race war is already on

          give it a few years and it is going to get very ugly as blacks are emboldened and encouraged to do bad things to whites

          I fear for the future of the USA and I am glad I am in Canada in small town that is over 99% white


          • on December 13, 2012 at 2:35 am Mike18xx

            As if the Watts riots didn’t happen forty years ago? Jesus….could we get back on track here?


            • on December 14, 2012 at 5:54 pm Canadian Friend

              It will be worse than the Watts riot , just give it time

              All the signs are there such as Harry Belafonte who said recently on MSNBC that Obama should have dictatorial power and imprison those who oppose him

              and since 98% of blacks are with Obama , those who would be imprisoned would not be black…

              Racial tensions are growing everyday, the pressure in the “melting pot” is growing

              something has got to give


          • on December 13, 2012 at 8:03 am Kate

            Americans need to realize their greatest power is not as voters but as consumers. What you buy determines supply. Stop funding the Idiocracy.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 4:33 pm josh

            I may be joining you!


        • on December 13, 2012 at 8:04 am thwack

          These jews like Weinstein are trying to start a race war in this country.
          ————————

          What are you talking about?

          White supremacy IS race war.

          White people have had a 500 year long “sucker punch”


          • on December 14, 2012 at 5:29 pm Canadian Friend

            White supremacism died in 1964

            now you have Black run America where whites are second class citizens and movies about blacks killing whites are considered entertainment

            How many Hollywood movies approved of the KKK again?

            yeah that’s what I thought.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 6:05 pm Jason

              “now you have Black run America where whites are second class citizens”

              Please, post more. I get a good chuckle out of your brand of lunacy…

              ….especially given the fact that you apparently live in Canada.


          • on December 16, 2012 at 5:17 pm Lucky White Male

            Whites are the Alpha. You are the Omega.

            It was God who preordained this – at the creation.

            Mr. Thwack (or should I say, “Mr. Nigger,”) You are my lackey, my peon, my serf.

            Carry on, while I smoke my cigar…


      • on December 12, 2012 at 8:52 pm Greg Eliot

        I admit I don’t keep up on the latest Hollywood dirt, but I’m pretty sure Burt Reynolds isn’t a homosexual… they just like to copy his look.


        • on December 12, 2012 at 9:16 pm Canadian Friend

          Almost everyone has been accused of being homosexual from Burt Reynolds to Abraham Lincoln

          I really don’t like Obama but I seriously doubt he is gay

          this is so absurd, not all those people could possibly be homosexuals


        • on December 12, 2012 at 10:34 pm Zombie Shane

          Let me guess – you’ve also got a big collection of Liberace LPs.


          • on December 13, 2012 at 12:42 am Greg Eliot

            Does Ferrante and Teischer count?

            Actually, even THEY were a bit before my time.

            But I do remember a funny Merv Griffin show (him a closet flamer, if rumor serves) where he asked Liberace:

            “So, Lee… why is it you’ve never gotten married?”

            “Well, I guess I just never found the right girl.”

            :LOOOLLZLZLZLZLZOOOOLLLZLZL. That’s how it was, back in the ’60′s.

            All seriousness aside, if you’ve got a case to make about Burt Reynolds, I think we here at the chateau would find it enlightening.

            But if you’re just spouting off on what you think, well… dumb accusations color the credibility of whatever else you say.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 6:17 pm john

              Sadler & Young?


      • on December 13, 2012 at 9:46 am Aliens in the Family

        Real Chicago cops? Two words: Jon Burge.

        His colleagues can do something to atone for his behavior, and I’d say that a great many of them do so on a daily basis, but any agency that retains someone like Burge for years when he’s torturing suspects for false confessions is troubled. There are no two ways about it.

        Better that such history be introduced into popular culture by a sheltered regional ethnic minority than not discussed at all.


      • on December 13, 2012 at 10:16 am Nobody of Import

        Don’t you mean “Marxists”, Zombie…? It’s quite a bit more accurate and less honestly “racist” since not all of them were Jews and all of them were Marxists.


        • on December 13, 2012 at 12:34 pm Greg Eliot

          Yes, we get it… NAJALT… but when studying a given pathology, sometimes the specific germs have to be identified.


          • on December 13, 2012 at 1:49 pm NiteLily

            “when studying a given pathology, sometimes the specific germs have to be identified”

            Yeah, you mean like saying that most of you hating on the Jews in every chance you get are really jealous losers more than you care about the country, and usually you’re of German descent. Those are the “specific germs to be identified” and will be identified.

            If you really cared about the country and were honest in your complaints, you’d be more accurate and identify the left and its ideology, not the Jew.

            Not all Jews are leftists. But you don’t care, do you? So long as there is at least one Jew, you’d always say the Jews controlling, blah, blah, blah….. Hell, even if there were no Jews, you’d still find ways to implicate them in your crazed maniacal hate.

            Hell, in some other places with more losers, like Zimbabwe, where there are no Jews, their despotic leader is always blaming the Jews for stealing all his money. So we see how it’s always the demagogues and the jealous types always blaming the Jew, even when there is no whiff of him around. Irrationality is the common dominator of all Jew haters, and that needs to be pointed out.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 3:52 pm thwack

              “the Jew is the demon behind the corruption of all mankind”–Wagner


            • on December 13, 2012 at 4:32 pm NiteLily

              LOL! I know. He hated the Jews because he saw so many of them during his time composing classical music and getting attention. As you know, in the 19th century the Jews flourished in Germany in philosophy, the art and the sciences. While they were revered by many for their contributions, they were also greatly envied. That old jealousy rearing its ugly head again. Sounds familiar?

              Wagner was a notorious anti-Semite Jew-hater, and much of his hatred of the Jews influenced Hitler a few decades later. Birds of a feather flock together.

              The funny thing is, he wasn’t so vehemently anti-Jewish when he first started out. He wasn’t pro or anti-Jewish. His wife is the one that got his hate more solidified and focused, and that’s when he started to devise reasons as to why he detested the Jew, as in “the Jew is the demon behind the corruption of all mankind.” Much of it is as incoherent as Hitler’s hate became later.

              His wife was the first to be extremely Jealous of his Jewish competitors. She was fiercely loyal to him and a bit prejudiced in her worship of him that she couldn’t see any other composer being more worthy, definitely not a Jew. She “opened” his eyes to the uppity Jew. The two of them became increasingly more envious of his Jewish competitors until their hate runneth over. That’s how all Jew hatred starts, with envy.

              That’s why it’s important to focus on the real enemy – leftism. Not use a religious group or a race and substitute them for the real enemy because you have an ulterior motive. It won’t solve the onslaught of the left against our county.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 5:58 pm Laconophile

              “Not all Jews are leftists.”

              NAJAL


            • on December 14, 2012 at 4:36 pm josh

              Single Jewish women went for Romney by 80% to a mere 15% for Obama!! WTF??


          • on December 13, 2012 at 4:49 pm Greg Eliot

            “the Jew is the demon behind the corruption of all mankind”–Wagner

            Wagner? You mean that just-jealous loser who never accomplished anything and couldn’t get laid?

            LLOZOZOZZOZOZOZLZLZLZLZLZOZOZOZOZOLZLZLZLZLZLZLZL


            • on December 13, 2012 at 5:24 pm NiteLily

              It pains you I have Wagner pegged, eh? Another one of your heroes – let me borrow you maniacal LLOZOZOZZOZOZOZLZLZLZLZLZOZOZOZOZOLZLZLZLZLZLZLZL. I knew you couldn’t resist. LOL! I have you pegged too – LLOZOZOZZOZOZOZLZLZLZLZLZOZOZOZOZOLZLZLZLZLZLZLZL.

              For the record, I didn’t say he couldn’t get laid, my twister-in-chief. I said he was jealous of his competition, as per his wife. And speaking about not getting laid, I just remembered that Cosima wasn’t a catch; she was ugh. If he were a true alpha, he wouldn’t have married her. She had a long nose and wide mouth and considered an ugly duckling, not to mention she was previously married and had two children. He cheated with her on her husband too, somewhat of a weasel, no? Anyway, who married such a woman back in those days? But I guess it’s hard for a low self-esteem man to resist such adulation, eh? Boy, did she worship the ground he walked on. They even started a music festival called the Bayreuth Festival to feature his “heavenly” music, which was closely associated with anti-Semitism and helped Nazi propaganda. Greg, I am surprised a man like you would be coming to the rescue of Nazis.

              Bottom line, he was nothing but a mediocre nutcase. If he weren’t so mediocre, he wouldn’t have been so worried about the “uppity” Jews giving him some competition. Excellence has no match.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 5:42 pm Greg Eliot

              Now I know you’re a Jew… only a Jew would have the chutzpah to call Wagner a mediocrity… or to think that any Jewish composer, especially of his time, was competition.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 5:51 pm corvinus

              NiteLily, I know you’re a run-of-the-mill conservative who loves Israel and Jews, but I have never understood the irrational, self-abasing support y’all give to Jews and Israel. What do they do for YOU?

              As far as I can tell: nothing. They just take.

              And for the record, I’m neutral on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 7:34 pm NiteLily

              LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

              I can’t type enough LOLs. How dare I say your hero Wagner is mediocre, eh? Guess, what? I do, and I am not Jewish, how’s that to get you even more riled up? He was as mediocre as Salieri was to Mozart. Jealous, aren’t they those classical music composers, no?

              “or to think that any Jewish composer, especially of his time, was competition.”

              He initially wasn’t very anti-Semitic. He had many Jewish friends and even a close one that was a rabbi’s son. Most of his anti-Semitism developed later stemming from his jealousy of his Jewish contemporaries, especially Giacomo Meyerbeer. I am not the one who refers to them as his competition. He and his wife thought of them as competition, as is well-documented. Again, you are misrepresenting my words.

              For the record, I don’t like much of the classical music from him or his Jewish contemporaries. I am more into Bach, Handel, Mozart, Beethoven – not Wagner or his supposed competitors. They were all mediocre in my eyes.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 1:57 am NiteLily

              “NiteLily, I know you’re a run-of-the-mill conservative who loves Israel and Jews,”

              LOL! You guys crack me up. Anyone who speaks any common sense is the “run-of-the-mill conservative.” I have to start spewing conspiracy theories to be accepted as more “evolved.” In other words, a progressive conservative, right? Not in a long shot.
              ____________________________________________________________

              “but I have never understood the irrational, self-abasing support y’all give to Jews and Israel. What do they do for YOU?”

              I am not self-abasing at all. I never speak ill of our people or our country. If you read my exchanges with Canadian Friend about the left, you’d know by now that I am not looking for scapegoating, I am looking to pinpoint exactly who is at fault for ruining this country and the West by extension. In my estimation, it’s a suite of liberal and leftist ideas proposed by radicals from all walks of life, creeds, and background. Some are Jewish without a doubt, but many are just run-of-the-mill whites, from liberal churches and various liberal secular organizations.
              ____________________________________________________________

              They just take”

              What are they taking exactly? Are they collecting benefits from the government? Are they on welfare, food stamps, farm subsidies? Are they the beneficiaries of affirmative action? WHAT exactly?
              ____________________________________________________________

              “What do they do for YOU?
              As far as I can tell: nothing. “

              LOL! Sometimes, I feel like a history teacher and a religion teacher all rolled into one, because most here don’t understand or realize the true heritage of America. You need to study history to review what Jews did for the west. Our entire world philosophy is based on classical Jewish thought. Of course, now it’s eroding with atheism being embraced by many Jews (how ironic) and Christians alike. But even over two centuries ago, in the midst of deep-rooted anti-Semitism, some realized the influence of the Jews and their religion on western thought, especially the American version of western thought. The Founding Fathers rejected Jesus as the deity, BUT they spoke of the Creator (Judaism refers to God as the Creator) and embraced Christian values, which is why they incorporated Judaism into the constitution, and why we say our society is built on Judeo-Christian values.

              Here is John Adams, Second President of the United States
              (From a letter to F. A. Van der Kemp [Feb. 16, 1808] Pennsylvania Historical Society):

              “I will insist the Hebrews have [contributed] more to civilize men than any other nation. If I was an atheist and believed in blind eternal fate, I should still believe that fate had ordained the Jews to be the most essential instrument for civilizing the nations … They are the most glorious nation that ever inhabited this Earth. The Romans and their empire were but a bubble in comparison to the Jews. They have given religion to three-quarters of the globe and have influenced the affairs of mankind more and more happily than any other nation, ancient or modern.”

              And there is of course, the Letter of George Washington to the Jews of New Port in 1790:

              “May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, and there shall be none to make him afraid. May the father of all mercies scatter light and not darkness in our paths, and make us all in our several vocations useful here, and in his own due time and way everlastingly happy.”

              And mark Twain, who even traveled to the Holy Land at the time:

              ”…If statistics are right, the Jews constitute but one percent of the human race. It suggests a nebulous dim puff of stardust lost in the blaze of the Milky way. properly, the Jew ought hardly to be heard of, but he is heard of, has always been heard of. He is as prominent on the planet as any other people, and his commercial importance is extravagantly out of proportion to the smallness of his bulk. His contributions to the world’s list of great names in literature, science, art, music, finance, medicine, and abstruse learning are also away out of proportion to the weakness of his numbers. He has made a marvelous fight in this world, in all the ages; and had done it with his hands tied behind him. He could be vain of himself, and be excused for it.

              The Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Persian rose, filled the planet with sound and splendor, then faded to dream-stuff and passed away; the Greek and the Roman followed; and made a vast noise, and they are gone; other people have sprung up and held their torch high for a time, but it burned out, and they sit in twilight now, or have vanished. The Jew saw them all, beat them all, and is now what he always was, exhibiting no decadence, no infirmities of age, no weakening of his parts, no slowing of his energies, no dulling of his alert and aggressive mind. All things are mortal but the Jew; all other forces pass, but he remains. What is the secret of his immortality?” Mark Twain
              (“Concerning The Jews,” Harper’s Magazine, 1899

              There is a famous story in which the Kaiser asks Bismarck, “Can you prove the existence of God?” Bismarck replies, “The Jews, your majesty. The Jews.”

              “It is against their own insoluble problem of being human that the dull and base in humanity are in revolt in anti-Semitism. Judaism, nevertheless, together with Hellenism and Christianity is an inalienable component of our Christian Western civilization, the eternal “call to Sinai” against which humanity again and again rebels. – Herman Rauschning, The Beast From the Abyss

              “Mankind, East and West, Christian and Muslim, accepted the Jewish conviction that there is only one God. Today it is polytheism that is so difficult to understand, that is so unthinkable.” – T.R. Grover, The Ancient World

              “The Jews started it all—and by ‘it’ I mean so many of the things we care about, the underlying values that make all of us, Jew and Gentile, believer and atheist, tick. Without the Jews, we would see the world through different eyes, hear with different ears, even feel with different feelings … we would think with a different mind, interpret all our experience differently, draw different conclusions from the things that befall us. And we would set a different course for our lives.” – Thomas Cahill, The Gifts Of The Jews

              There are too many to include them all here, even Napoleon had thoughts on the Jews’ miraculous survival. So why deny facts. One has to be deaf blind and stupid not to see what the Jews are. But, you don’t have to be a fan of the Jews. Except, hating them without any rationality only leads to the correct conclusion that one is simply Jealous of their achievements.

              It’s one thing to criticize them for embracing atheism (if that bothers you, as it does me) and Marxism (which also irks me), and abandoning their religion in favor of strange ideologies that help the decay of the West. You can criticize them for being leftist and too liberal, which many of them are. But to blame all of our ills on the Jews, is simply irrational and uneducated. It will not solve anything. And there are still plenty of conservative Jews out there who are very vocal, coming down hard on their liberal brethren, which no one on this blog ever mentions, as if conservative Jews don’t exist.

              I was always fascinated by the Jews and their religion. I can honestly say that without understanding Judaism, you can’t understand Christianity. Many Jew haters try to hide all Jewish ancestry of Christianity, as Hitler did in his time. They try to minimize and trivialize them and spread lies and rumor, much like Greg does here. And there is a big difference between criticizing them for liberalism, and engaging in Nazi-like anti-Semitic propaganda. If we seek to destroy the Jews, we’ll be destroying our own culture in the interim.
              ____________________________________________________________

              “And for the record, I’m neutral on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

              I don’t know how anyone can remain neutral when the Muslims are in the wrong, trying to take the Jew’s land away from them and waging none-stop war on them. If bombs were launched into Texas from Mexico, you wouldn’t sit quietly. It’s a conflict started by a fake people over fake grievances. And for the record, the Islamic enemies of the Jews are also our enemies. The Muslims don’t distinguish between Jew or Christian. We are all the infidel to them. You should be rooting for the Jews just because it will stop the Muslims from advancing to us next, as we’re in their crosshair. Once they are done with the Jews, do you think their thirst for world domination and spreading of Islam will be magically quenched? It’s in our best interest for the Jews to defeat the Muslims. Wise up!


            • on December 14, 2012 at 2:38 am Jason

              I’m not a Jew, and Wagner is mediocre.

              That other non-Jew wag, Mark Twain, nailed it much more ambiguously: “Wagner’s music is better than it sounds.” Total neg.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 2:49 am NiteLily

              LOL! And I just commented something to corvinus about Mark Twain. It will probably show up tomorrow. Mark Twain nailed it on a lot of things, and he used humor to so it.

              The only reason Greg likes Wagner is because he was an anti-Semite. That’s why he sees his music as A n g e l I c, lol. That’s why he lacks credibility on everything. I rather listen to a snake charmer than to his rationalization.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 2:54 am Greg Eliot

              I’m not a Jew, and Wagner is mediocre.

              That other non-Jew wag, Mark Twain, nailed it much more ambiguously: “Wagner’s music is better than it sounds.” Total neg.

              Ah, alphie to the rescue again, with yet another imagined triumph.

              Twain was notorious for his biting satire… his barb is merely a reflection of that sort of wit, not a mark of alleged “mediocrity” on the part of Wagner… you should be smart enough to know this. He had plenty of disparaging things to say about plenty of people (I believe Austen was one of his favorite whipping girls, but I digress).

              And Twain can be forgiven his lack of appreciation, in light of not being around long enough to see Wagner’s works still being played from Bayreuth to Moscow to NYC to other corners of the world more than 100 years later.

              People not having a taste for that sort of opera is understandable… but calling it “mediocre” reflects more on the intellectual abilities of the accuser rather than the composer.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:02 am Jason

              No, Wagner is too prolix.

              But let’s give credit where credit is due — German/Prussian/Austrain baroque and classic compositions are unparalleled. I bow down before Bach, as does anyone with an ear.

              Wagner just got to the party about a century and a half too late.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:17 am NiteLily

              “I bow down before Bach, as does anyone with an ear.”

              Exactly, which is why I love Bach, but not fucking Wagner. And as far as operas, no body does it better than the Italians.

              The only one of Wagner’s contemporaries I like is Johann Strauss II, his music was light, but oh so beautiful. The Blue Danube, what a beauty.

              As far as Twain is concerned, he had great wit. But he really had Wagner pegged, as he had many other things.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:20 am Greg Eliot

              Wagner just got to the party about a century and a half too late.

              Who boy, if this doesn’t show your incompetence to judge Western music and its history, then nothing will.

              As I mentioned, what one likes personally is one thing… what is true artistic achievement and revolutionary accomplishment can be quite another, and is not subjective.

              One may prefer to listen to, say, the Brandenburg Concertos or Ein Feste Burg, rather than sit through a performance of The Ring.

              But to say the latter is mediocre… or a mere pastiche of past composers, well… again, that reflects more on listener’s education than the composer’s achievement.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:30 am NiteLily

              “As I mentioned, what one likes personally is one thing… what is true artistic achievement and revolutionary accomplishment can be quite another, and is not subjective.”

              Oh, it’s subjective, alright. You’re proof of it. You like it when most don’t. The only reason you like Wagner is because he was an anti-Semite. That’s why you see his music as A n g e l i c, lol. Where is your objectivity?


            • on December 14, 2012 at 11:05 am Greg Eliot

              The only reason you like Wagner is because he was an anti-Semite

              LLLOOOOZOZOZOZOZOZLZLZLZLZLZLZOZOZOOOOZLZL

              Could you possibly embarrass yourself any further?


            • on December 14, 2012 at 4:38 pm josh

              Looking at modern entertainment and “art” I have to say,come on!! Hitler wasnt wrong about everything.


        • on December 13, 2012 at 2:06 pm NiteLily

          It’s interesting how these guys even manage to implicate Tarantino who isn’t a Jew, at least as a Jewish sympathizer. Jason told them he’s odd. Therefore, these are the kinds of movies he likes to make and he finds funding for them; he’s not being put up to it by Jews. He’s a nut, and in Hollywood there is no shortage of nuts. So he finds distribution companies for his projects easily.

          But these guys make it sound like he gets approval to make such films from his devil masters the Jews. These guys have no idea how Hollywood works. Once you get an idea for a movie (your idea, no one puts you up to it, or makes you deliver to order), you have to shop it around. Once you get funding (a distribution company, usually backed by a bank like Chase or Wells), you make the film. No one put Tarantino up to it, they just think that his film ideas can make them money; it’s buisness. It’s all about what sells and what doesn’t, and unfortunately what Tarantino puts out sells with the movie-going left. That’s why it’s important not to support his work. Don’t pay to see it.

          Many powerful non-Jews in Hollywood and Tarantino is one of them. The common denominator is they are all lefties, or liberal. The common denominator is not Jewish, since not all of them are Jews. That’s a distinction that has to be made if one is to remain honest about one’s grievances.

          These men complaining about the Jews all day long in every thread, well….you know they are mostly jealous of the Jews being in “such position of power” and “using their wealth…..,”blah, blah, blah. I can’t think of any other explanation ; they are resentful of the Jew’s perceived “power.” Hitler said the same things about the Jew and got “peeved” over the same perceived “grievances.” Their rhetoric is obviously very eerily similar.


          • on December 13, 2012 at 4:59 pm kgaard

            I don’t completely disagree … but … You really should read on the emigration of Jewish professors out of Germany and through the New School of Social Research in the mid-20th Century. The place was a diploma mill. Thousands of these professors then went across the country to spread a Freudian/Marxian philosophy. Some of it was okay, some of it I agree with (The Organization Man … not a bad book), and some of it is bad. But look at it from a jewish emigre’s perspective: He almost got offed by an all-white maniacal horde. Wouldn’t it be in his best interest to proffer philosophies that tend to work counter to the notion that a monolothic, solid white culture is a good thing?


            • on December 13, 2012 at 5:16 pm Greg Eliot

              Maybe it would be better yet to proffer a philosophy to his own tribe about not doing the things that get said “all-white maniacal hordes” pissed off at them… and not just in 20th century German, but all throughout Western history.

              Like the man said: “Once can happen to anyone… twice might just be bad luck… but three or more times, well… things are starting to look suspicious.”


            • on December 13, 2012 at 7:17 pm NiteLily

              “Thousands of these professors then went across the country to spread a Freudian/Marxian philosophy.”

              That was the philosophy of Germany; they spread what they knew. It wasn’t born in the New World, was it? They imported it from Europe. The fact that some Jews put together some of the pieces of the puzzle to that philosophy, doesn’t make only the Jews the proponents of it. What about Kant and Hegel? How about all the other Germanic philosophers from Martin Luther on? The Germans seem to have more philosophers than any other nation, except the Jews and their monotheism-related writers before the 19th century. Much of German philosophy is in contradiction to Judeo-Christian thought, which is why you are speaking ill of it, and rightfully so. But you seem to think it’s Jewish inspired; it’s not.

              “Some of it was okay, some of it I agree with (The Organization Man … not a bad book), and some of it is bad.”

              As with everything, some is good and some is bad. From the Jews perspective, when they wrote about monotheism and morality in their various writings it was so good that the West built its foundations on it, without being proselytized by the Jews, mind you. They don’t proselytize; they write their stuff for their own people. Yet, the West seemed to like their stuff and adopted much of it.

              In contrast, Marx’s philosophy is bad. In fact, he hated Judaism so much, he came up with something that’s the total antithesis to it. He sprung up at a time when many thinkers were dumping all Judeo-Christian beliefs. That’s why the three gods of the modern world are Darwin, Marx and Freud = ATHEISM. Yet, The entire West has now adopted this philosophy. Marx is just a self-hating parasite atheist who jumped on his own people and America for being Capitalists. Why would Europe adopt his gibberage? Because he tied it into the German philosophy of the time.

              From Jesus to Marx, a tale of two Jews, if you will.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 7:20 pm NiteLily

              You need to get educated on that said philosophy you say he brought for his own tribe. That was German philosophy, not Jewish, and thank God this country is not based on German philosophy or things would have looked much bleaker. Maybe I am prejudiced to my own ancestors, but I thank God we have the Anglicized version of Judeo-Christianity in this country, not German.

              “Like the man said: “Once can happen to anyone… twice might just be bad luck… but three or more times, well… things are starting to look suspicious.”

              What happened all through western history, pray tell? We scapegoated the Jew for all of our ills, troubles, and diseases? LOL, you really need to have your head examined.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 12:55 pm Anonymous Conservative

              I think one point to consider is that it isn’t productive to characterize based one race or religion if we are looking to attack leftism, because that is how leftists survive. If we are heading to times as ugly as it seems, we should focus on hardcore Liberal Ideologues as our enemies. They are the poison which is killing our society, and they come in more than one race or religion.

              The problem is all of us aggressive warriors tend to be combative, and look for somebody to fight with, who want’s to fight with us. Say “Jew” or “Black”, and you will end up fighting a Black or Jewish K-type warrior, who is fundamentally patriotic, and want’s freedom from government themselves. Meanwhile the Liberal ideologues will all scurry under rocks to hide, and survive the bloodbath they brought about. That is how they work. They are cowards, trying to make us fight each other so they can enjoy advantage.

              By saying Jew, you simultaneously put yourself in a fight with fighting Jews, and distract the movement from the leftists who aren’t Jews, from Van Jones, to the La Raza types, to the Kennedy’s, all of whom should receive appropriate tender, loving ministrations, as Heartiste says, when the end comes.

              JMHO.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 5:03 pm josh

              Responding to Nitelily:Our allies in WWll were the Britsh Empire & the Soviet empire!!The brits have along history of invading and subverting most of the nations of the world. The British occupation of Ireland stands as one of histories most grotesquely cruel,sick,twisted and vicious campaigns–tho the wasps on both sides of the pond like to shrug that off.(“Cromwell? Decent chap.Lots of bad press.”)The Brits cheerfully bombed Dresden–another one down the memory hole. Many Jews were burned up in that holocaust,darling. The Soviets? Tho you have the DNA of Paul Robeson and other such morons you canNOT–in this day and age–be stupid enough not to know about the record of the USSR,right?And the jewish participation thereof??This bullshit that jews are the Innocents of the World is mind-boggling!! Wish you had fallen prey to some of those Jew “interrogators”. Your innate submissive African desire to submit to the Big Man causes you to enshrine Jews as the Golden Children,so write this twaddle about Germany being singularly evil,as opposed to the UK,the Japanese, the Turks,(the Armenians,hello Kim K?)the Chinese–agin their own,but still–and all the endless nations and peoples that have robbed and raped and killed and made fun of people,(Like every nation in Affica!Or your precious Jews!Who was the leader of the slave trade?) If Germany is the poster child for being a bad boy its only because they lost,and they stood up to the wrong guys.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 6:02 pm NiteLily

              Josh, you tend to mumble a lot, and I have no patience in reading between the lines to try to decipher what the fuck you are trying to say. BUT, if you are trying to equate the British with the Germans, then get the fuck out. There is no compression. If it weren’t for the British Empire, half the earth would still be engulfed in darkness. The British civilized the savages, and that’s a fact. However, sometimes in the process of civilizing said savages there is pain, no doubt about it. As Matt says, “a teaching moment.” However, the Brits left every place better than they have found it. Not so the Germans, or anyone else involved in imperialism. How revisionist is your history?

              The British bombed Dresden? That bothers you? Good! Too bad they didn’t do much worse; maybe that war would have ended faster and more innocent lives would have been spared. How about the USA dropping the A Bomb on Japan, did that bother you, or just the Germans getting their just deserts? Don’t bother to answer, I already know your warped mind. For the record, both the Japanizes and the Germans got their just deserts by my calculations, for starting a war that killed tens-of-millions of innocent people. Whoever starts an unjustified war, deserves to get whatever is coming his way, and let the Bowels of Hell open to engulf him.

              Regarding the innocence of the Jews (I can’t believe I am still trying to decipher your bullshit), I have said already many times that I don’t view liberal or lefty Jews as innocent. They are evil as all lefties are – Jew and Gentile alike. Let me clarify to some of you who aren’t smart enough, the danger is in trying to substitute Jew for liberal and lefty, as Greg Eliot tries to do in every one of his moronic comments. Not all Jews are lefty. 32% of Jews didn’t vote for Obama, so why implicate all of them? There are many innocent conservative Jews speaking against the left and feeling horrified by their Jewish liberal brethren who lost all sight of their true Judaic traditions, and have substituted them with lefty ideals. Our war is not with the Jews, our war is with the left, which comes in all shape and sizes. Just read the comment preceding yours by Anonymous Conservative. He said it perfectly and eloquently, and I can’t believe that you even posted your moronic convoluted comment after he already explained why blaming just the Jews is very dangerous to our cause.

              The rest of your mumblings sound like a you are teenager. Since I passed that age a few years ago, I have no interest in speaking with boys. Learn to write too.


          • on December 13, 2012 at 10:04 pm kgaard

            German philosophy is something I know a fair bit about. You can see the Holocaust coming all the way back in the 1790s, in the writings of Fichte. It’s really shocking: If you read the whole string of philosophers (Fichte –> Schelling –> Hegel –> Nietzsche –> Heidegger) — it’s like a slow motion train wreck. The overarching theme is that racial unity can lead to salvation for the Germanic people. It just builds and builds from one generation to the next. Now, Marx and Freud stand decidedly OUTSIDE that tradition. So, the Jewish emigres to the U.S. were not taking traditional Germany philosophy with them, they were taking Marx and Freud.

            One thing I have always found a bit perplexing is that the Jewish emigres to Israel appear to have huge chunks of traditional Germanic philosophy and attempted to build a true nation-state there.

            Again … my larger point is that the Jewish people have acted rationally in every instance.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 1:28 am NiteLily

              “Now, Marx and Freud stand decidedly OUTSIDE that tradition. So, the Jewish emigres to the U.S. were not taking traditional Germany philosophy with them, they were taking Marx and Freud.”

              Correct, BUT Marx and Freud are not the same, although they were both atheists. Let’s leave Freud on the side for now. Marx is highly connected to Haglesim and Kantian philosophy. Marx built on Hagel which is built on Kant.

              If we are going to search for the roots of Marxism, there is no end to it. Marx was influenced by many philosophers of the 18th and 19th centuries, but his philosophy IS NOT Jewish. That‘s what I was trying to convey. It’s not based on anything resembling Judaism, and Marx was a complete atheist anyway, who married a Gentile. So if we have anyone to blame for Marxism, it’s not Judaism, it’s a mix of European philosophies. In a nutshell, Marxism is built on French socialism (which goes all the way back to the French Revolution) and Rousseau’s idea of egalitarian democracy, German idealist philosophy, especially Hagel and Kant, and a deviation of Scottish political economy (anti-Adam smith).

              “One thing I have always found a bit perplexing is that the Jewish emigres to Israel appear to have huge chunks of traditional Germanic philosophy and attempted to build a true nation-state there.”

              Israel is a little bit different in its development. The modern State of Israel was started by communist Jews from Russia, but communism was never adopted because of its atheism. Socialism was adopted at first, and now Israel is moving into strong Capitalism. The reason Communism was never adopted was because the religious Jews refused to sanction it, as it’s opposed to classical Jewish thought. For a long time, Israel was 50-50 politically between the right and the left, much like it is here. And they also had very strong cultural wars. However, in recent years, while the US has been increasingly moving left, much too much to our chagrin, Israel has been increasingly moving right. That’s why now their political demographics is 65-35 in favor of the Right, and that’s due to a revival of Judaism. That’s why the Jews in Israel are different from American Jews. Therefore, we can learn from this that the only way to get back to conservative ideals is to go back to Christian values. If one is not a religious Christian, it shouldn’t matter. We are not talking about Christian theology or the religion itself, we are talking about Christian values which hold the principles of our nation. That’s why I get upset when the atheists constantly disparage the Christian readers here. They speak about morality, but many here act as if they are poisoning the water.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 1:31 am NiteLily

              “It’s really shocking: If you read the whole string of philosophers (Fichte –> Schelling –> Hegel –> Nietzsche –> Heidegger) — it’s like a slow motion train wreck.”

              I would say, it even started with Martin Luther.

              “The overarching theme is that racial unity can lead to salvation for the Germanic people.”

              Exactly, and that’s why I see a very strong similarity with the Jew bashers. I have noticed that they are constantly attempting to substitute the Jew when they are speaking about leftists or liberals. That’s not going to get rid of the left. That will only serve to start a race war that will destroy America. Before WWII, Germany had many problems, and Hitler instead of focusing on solving those problems he focused on killing the Jews and starting WWII. Did it solve anything for Germany? No. It made the German people suffer terribly, and their good name has been dragged through the mud forever. Forever the German people will be associated with mass murder, hatred, and unimagined cruelty. It’s only due to the Jews’ forgiveness that they have a good relationship with Israel, which has rehabilitated their image a bit.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 2:42 am Jason

              +1

              You brought back some good intellectual history memories. I think I wrote a paper on that a long time ago.


            • on December 15, 2012 at 8:31 pm corvinus

              “It’s really shocking: If you read the whole string of philosophers (Fichte –> Schelling –> Hegel –> Nietzsche –> Heidegger) — it’s like a slow motion train wreck.”

              I would say, it even started with Martin Luther.

              I’ve never understood what was with Germans (and French too, to a lesser extent) and boneheaded philosophies.


            • on December 16, 2012 at 2:21 pm NiteLily

              @corvinus

              “I’ve never understood what was with Germans (and French too, to a lesser extent) and boneheaded philosophies.”

              Exactly!


          • on December 14, 2012 at 9:04 pm josh

            NiteLily:Hey fuck you,ya stupid cunt. Get a life;post a pic or GTFO


            • on December 15, 2012 at 9:41 am Lara

              NiteLily is an intelligent commenter and good debater.


            • on December 15, 2012 at 2:24 pm Greg Eliot

              NiteLily is an intelligent commenter and good debater

              As birds of a feather flock together,
              So hamsters of a fur always concur.

              Tell me, dahling… which of her posts did you find most intelligent? The one where she says I only like Wagner ’cause he’s an antisemite, or the ones where she says I worship Hitler?

              LLOOZOZOZOZOZOZLZLZLZLZLZLZOZOZOZOZLZLZL


            • on December 15, 2012 at 3:09 pm NiteLily

              Lara, didn’t I call josh a teenage boy and Greg a fetish-ed Nazi worshiper? As always, I’m right on target.

              Now let me cut n’ paste to save me the trouble

              LLOOZOZOZOZOZOZLZLZLZLZLZLZOZOZOZOZLZLZL


            • on December 15, 2012 at 8:39 pm Lara

              I was giving NiteLily credit for her willingness to debate more than the brilliance of her arguments.


            • on December 15, 2012 at 9:46 pm Greg Eliot

              Most here at the chateau would find more admirable the willingness to eschew debate (especially the long-winded screed variety), rather than continuously talking out one’s backside.

              Of course, that’s the masculine frame of reference. ;-)


            • on December 16, 2012 at 2:23 pm NiteLily

              Well, of course you want me to eschew debate, dah. But why would I make it easy on you? You spew shit so you have to put up with the consequences. A big boy doesn’t complain.


            • on December 16, 2012 at 2:26 pm Greg Eliot

              But little girls do… incessantly.


            • on December 16, 2012 at 2:30 pm Greg Eliot

              There you go again… talking out your ass and calling it debate.

              You have the right to your own opinions… just not your own facts… and certainly not your own dictionary.


            • on December 16, 2012 at 2:51 pm NiteLily

              LOL! I never complain about your actions. I debunk your bullshit with facts. There is a difference. You, on the other hand, constantly complain about why I can’t keep my mouth shut. That’s juvenile and weak.

              And my facts are accurate. Yours are not facts. You try to cover the truth or omit info because you’re worried about giving your Nazi friends, including yourself, a bad name.

              Honey, I understand your motives better than you do.


            • on December 16, 2012 at 3:12 pm Greg Eliot

              Again, you’re not entitled to your own dictionary, toots.

              By your stalking, it’s plain you’re more enamored of the spankings I give you than any of your alleged “facts”… such as my appreciation of Wagnerian opera is “only because he’s an antisemite”… lllllllozozozozollllllolI

              I suppose I shouldn’t keep whipping that expired equine, but it really was the highpoint of your “factual debate” skills. ;-)


            • on December 16, 2012 at 3:22 pm NiteLily

              You give me no spanking hun. You keep losing to me in every debate. That’s why, had you stuck to the truth you wouldn’t have such problems now. The truth shall set you free, you know.

              Ha Ha….it’s funny……all losers claim premature victory. You often find it in the common denominator of the defeated. They need something to lift up their self-esteem.


            • on December 16, 2012 at 3:31 pm Greg Eliot

              Ha Ha….it’s funny……all losers claim premature victory. You often find it in the common denominator of the defeated. They need something to lift up their self-esteem.

              Time once again, folks, to play: (audience in unison)

              SPOT… THE… IRONY!!! (raucous applause)


            • on December 16, 2012 at 7:23 pm NiteLily

              Spin, spin, spin, spin, spin, spin, spin, spin, spin, spin…….and then spin some more……………


    • on December 12, 2012 at 5:15 pm thebechtloff

      “Tarantino is the racial equivalent of a cuckold fetishist”

      Don’t most cuckold fetishes have a racial component to them? Isn’t is alwas a black guy they want to see violating their women?

      Maybe I’m wrong, I certainly don’t claim to have my finger on the pulse of that sub culture, but thats the impression I always got.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 4:42 pm josh

        Where IS your finger,you perv??


    • on December 12, 2012 at 5:55 pm Lucky White Male

      The Manosphere must come down hard on Foxx, Tarantino and the producer Harvey Weinstein.

      Why would you make such a white race-baiting movie? We all know that if this is allowed in the name of “satire” – this will be only be the beginning.

      I’m waiting for Roosh V to be a man and condemn “Django” for the anti-white race baiting it is — let’s hear it Roosh

      How about Virgie Kent? Let’s hear what Virgie Kent has to say in terms of condemning this — I know these guys are looking out for their white brothers.

      I’ll be checking in


      • on December 13, 2012 at 2:39 am Mike18xx

        The ignorance of the white-powder crowd here today is breath-taking — have you ever heard of “Sweet Sweetback’s Badass Song”?

        “Django Unchanged” is a send-up of spaghetti westerns and 70s blaxploitation movies — and you idiots are too stupid to get it.

        [Heartiste: You seem to be unaware that a convenient "send-up" can coexist with anti-white self-hatred.]


        • on December 13, 2012 at 12:29 pm Greg Eliot

          You’re too stupid to realize that “it’s just satire” is a convenient Trojan Horse for stoking the antiwhite coals and excusing the antiwhite racism… and this particular and alleged “send-up” is just another especially heinous weapon towards that end.

          Indeed, his entire body of work suits the agenda and is touted by Hollyweird for that very reason… all the while claiming “homage” and “satire” as pseud-artistry and justification for truly odious misuse of the power of the medium.

          Funny, back in the day, Streicher did a few “send-ups” of his own… but nobody called the judges at Nuremberg “too stupid” to realize it.

          Now avaunt, asshole.


        • on December 14, 2012 at 5:08 pm josh

          Man,Mike18xx you are SOOOO intelligent!! Thank you!! How cool of Jamie Foxx to take part in a satirical attack on black violence against whites. Honestly he doesnt really seem like the type to have those views. He is kinda like RGIII;he’s a corny negro. Wow.


        • on December 14, 2012 at 6:00 pm Canadian Friend

          I can’t speak for other people here, I don’t know them but I am very well informed, especially about the witch hunt on white people going on, and this movie is a symptom of it

          There is a long long list of things that whites are the only race not allowed to do or of privileges that only whites are denied,

          to pretend all this is not happening is ludicrous

          whites are now officially second class citizens , how can anyone deny this???


    • on December 13, 2012 at 2:27 am whorefinder

      Tarantino’s also gotten butt loads of undeserved praise for “merging” so-called “grindhouse/low budget” film-making with “artistry.”

      His action sequences are entertaining, and his knowledge of film is deep (he is an autistic tard), but he’s actually not very artistic. He just explains and covers up his screwup very well, and the same with his flights of fance. Case in point: “Inglorious Basterds”–at several points the subtitles translate the term “Wunderbar” differently–sometimes it’s “wonderful!” other times it’s left as “Wunderbar!” and other times its not translated at all. That;’s just plain bad work, but I’m sure he explained it as something very meaningful that all the critical fags liked.

      And the Boss is right: Tarantino, like most lefties, is a faggot with a cuckold fetish—he desperately wants to see the Big Black Stud impregnating a white woman while he self-flagellates (remember Pulp Fiction, where Uma Thurman is the trophy wife of *laugh* a nigger crime boss?)


      • on December 20, 2012 at 6:31 pm Tockley Smoo

        Tarantino studied film making at Blockbuster. It shows.


  4. on December 12, 2012 at 3:23 pm Tits Megee

    Can someone please explain this too me and how it relates to tarintino?

    Also clarification of Heariste’s comment would be good.

    Im so unaware.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 3:28 pm askjoe

      I also decline to rtfm, so what’s going here? Is it cause Quentin is doing a blackploitation revenge porn film?

      BTW, being “romantically” linked to Margaret Cho or Kathy G is a sign of closet homosexuality. Or some sort of self-flagellation. Now that I think about it, every chick in his movies is kinda ugly or uglified in some way.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 3:30 pm Customer Service

      Terantino directed this movie coming out called Django which is two hours of a black man going around and killing white people. Heartiste’s take, rightfully so, is that Terantino gets off on seeing his own white race being annihilated.


      • on December 12, 2012 at 7:45 pm Canadian Friend

        …Terantino gets off on seeing his own white race being annihilated.

        and tragically… so do millions of white liberals


      • on December 13, 2012 at 5:14 am soliddrink

        OK, I understand that there is some reference to Tarantino and DJango Unchained after reading all these comments, but I am still missing the connection from British wartime poster to DJango Unchained..

        How does a 1939 British wartime morale flier that has been bloodied relate to Quentin Tarantino and DJango Unchained?

        The poster, which in full should say “Keep Calm And Carry On” was supposed to boost morale of Brits during the Nazi invasion. A bloodied one would otherwise indicate the invasion was a success, and the war was taken to the Brits. So I get the aspect having it posted on this site that there is a successful war going on against men. But I am failing to see how it relates to white males in particular, and DJango Unchained. Anyone care to explain?

        [Heartiste: I think you do see the connection but are trolling for shits and giggles. Nevertheless, I'm in a holiday spirit sort of way, so I'll assume you're not being disingenuous and explain it to you. The West is currently undergoing a horrible evil experiment with universal equalism, the fantastical belief that all humans and all human groups are equal in ability and predisposition, and any real world outcomes that suggest otherwise are assumed to be the result of "privileged" groups oppressing "diverse" groups. In practice, this ideology amounts to anti-white hatred, as both a consequence of the equalist ideology and a psychological motivation which sustains the rancid ideology. The "Keep Cal *blood splatter*" logo is an artistic interpretation of the fruits of this wicked ideology and a warning for the near future. The logo symbolizes with its stark minimalism the real or metaphorical blood that inevitably will flow, in the face of ruling class denials and tranquilizing assurances, from the influx of masses of naturally antagonistic non-white foreigners to the soils of historically white nations coupled with the blame for these non-white failures on the native stock whites who built the countries to which the migrants flee and from which the migrants feast like flies on a bloated carcass. As the host-leech ratio tips in favor of the leeches, and the infrastructure of the nation crumbles under the weight of a less competent labor force able to maintain it let alone build it from scratch, and the cultural apparatus of what is euphemistically known as "the Cathedral" -- the media, entertainment, academia, and bureaucratic industrial complexes -- works in concert with breathtakingly galling efficiency to undermine Western self-confidence and pride in its achievements and history while simultaneously crafting false myths intended to crown "diverse" peoples with a nobility they don't come near to displaying in reality on their own, the day when keeping calm aided by the help of distracting technogadgets and empty elite bromides is a workable strategy for getting by in life will no longer suffice to stem the blood-dimmed tide of tribal affiliation, raw visceral hatred, and corrosive distrust that is soon to be the fate of a fractured and dissolute America.

        The logo is, in short, a visual representation of the CH maxim: DIVERSITY + PROXIMITY = WAR.]


        • on December 13, 2012 at 11:38 am Anonymous

          Well said, CH. We are well past Camp of the Saints at this point, and there will be rivers of blood as Enoch Powell predicted…….and not just in his UK.


        • on December 13, 2012 at 12:19 pm Greg Eliot

          Another way I like to look at the irony of this logo is that the original was, as the poster said, in answer to the “Nazi threat”… and the carpet-bomb valor of the so-called “Greatest Generation”… lest “we’d all be speaking German” today.

          Instead, they made the world safe for pidgin Spanish and ebonics… and their own granddaughters dare not stroll the streets of their own cities and towns unaccompanied, if at all.

          And any man who now dares stand up, even if only in words, to the coloured menace that threatens the West, has the same tired epithets of that era heaped upon him.

          +1 on the Raspail reference


        • on December 13, 2012 at 3:08 pm Omega_Dork

          I doubt he was trolling because I needed the explanation, too. It was the almost instant segue from the poster to Tarantino that was confusing.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 8:38 am soliddrink

            Yeah, I was not trolling. I was literally clueless, even after being an avid reader of this blog for a year or so now. Thanks for the detailed explanation CH.


        • on December 13, 2012 at 8:50 pm John O.

          The length of that riposte would put me off trolling for life.


  5. on December 12, 2012 at 3:25 pm Heywood Jablome

    Some of us refuse to surrender. My approach is more “keep calm, maintain sight picture, and smoothly squeeze the trigger.”


    • on December 13, 2012 at 10:17 am Nobody of Import

      :-D


  6. on December 12, 2012 at 3:47 pm Abe

    “What explains a guy like Tarantino? A completely soulless piece of shit… An omega weirdo who would never see a pussy except for the fact that his uber-nerd movie fascination and work ethic paid off in fame and money.”

    Can’t really improve on this. Just one story- he was doing an interview and talking about what it was like to shoot “Kill Bill”. He and Umma Thurman became “close” on set according to him- spent hours and hours having deep, soulful conversations with her. Interviewer asked if anything happened between them. “Nah, man, that ship sailed” or something to that effect. Now imagine what sleazy, pudgeballe like, oh, Brett Ratner could have done with that opportunity.


    • on December 13, 2012 at 2:36 am whorefinder

      Yeah, he’s such a beta that Uma Thurman—an ugly woman that he made a superstar—won’t sleep with him. In fact, he’s so beta he gives off the vibe to non-famous girls. I remember a semi-club whore I dated (for shame) who was talking about the famous people she “saw” at clubs. She was saying how she could see why Uma was playing with him—it was nice to have an admirerer, but he was too creepy to sleep with. This is from a girl who thought reality TV stars were worth being a groupie to.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 9:10 pm Glengarry

        Actresses have been known to do more outrageous things than take off their socks when in the company of a director. I guess it’s a comparatively easy life once you get used to the slobbering.


        • on December 15, 2012 at 8:00 am whorefinder

          Steve Salier has an argument that states that while many leading men in Hollywood aren’t gay, they’re quite willing to be sexually molested/sleep with a faggy producer once or twice to start them on the road to stardom. Hence, John Travolta.


          • on December 15, 2012 at 8:55 am PA

            I wouldn’t rule out Brad Pitt and Leonardo Decaprio as having been through a casting couch. Leo in fact starred in a movie that involved many open-mouth kisses wiht another male actor.


            • on December 16, 2012 at 2:28 pm NiteLily

              And the way Brad Pitt defends homosexuality could be another indication.


  7. on December 12, 2012 at 4:17 pm Rick Derris

    I’m not going to waste my money and time on this movie.

    I’m waiting for the movie where a black man from southern Sudan rises up and starts shooting at the armies of Omar al-Bashir or Kunta Kinte slices up the Arabs who were most likely the ones who sold him into slavery. Instead we get garbage like Asshole’s Creed 3.

    Thank you, entertainment industry. You’re no more transparent than the aliens from “They Live” after Rowdy Roddy puts on the sunglasses.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 5:00 pm corvinus

      Thank you, entertainment industry. You’re no more transparent than the aliens from “They Live” after Rowdy Roddy puts on the sunglasses.

      One of the best movies of the 1980s.


      • on December 12, 2012 at 5:20 pm Ronin

        Very red pill.


      • on December 13, 2012 at 2:43 am whorefinder

        Best fight scene ever.

        Also: “I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick ass. And I’m all out of bubble gum.”

        “That’s like putting perfume on a pig.”


        • on December 13, 2012 at 10:16 am Uncle Elmer

          Best fight scene in my opinion is Humphrey Bogart and his pal beating up the oil crew foreman who stiffed them in “The Treasure of The Sierra Madre”.

          Bogie was a genuine tough guy who got his lisp from getting smacked in the face by a prisoner when he was an MP in the Navy back in WWI days.

          Probably why his fight scene was disturbingly clumsy instead of the lovely martial-arts ballet acts we see in most modern films.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 6:14 pm anononononno

      Haven’t fired up the old Xbox in anger in years but I’ve heard that the asshole’s creed is very subversive to america and that the designers, funders are very arab and very anti-christian and anti-american.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 7:07 pm Dan Fletcher

      Why the mention of Assassin’s Creed 3? Just curious, never played those games…


      • on December 12, 2012 at 10:02 pm Rick Derris

        In the game you play the descendant of a guy from the historical assassins and you’re supposed to stop the Knights Templar who are out to take over the world. Never mind that the Knights have been defunct since the 14th century yet there are Islamist organizations that make clear that they won’t stop bombings until there is a worldwide caliphate.

        Oops, I forgot – I’m not allowed to talk about this stuff:

        http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/12/new-army-manual-orders-soldiers-not-to-criticize-taliban/


        • on December 13, 2012 at 2:33 pm NiteLily

          “yet there are Islamist organizations that make clear that they won’t stop bombings until there is a worldwide caliphate.
          Oops, I forgot – I’m not allowed to talk about this stuff:”

          No, please some of us are not mentally defunct. We want the truth, not ridiculous conspiracy theories.

          “Here is a strong indicator that the Obama Administration’s crusade to appease Islam has gone too far; a new U.S. military handbook for troops deployed to the Middle East orders soldiers not to make derogatory comments about the Taliban or criticize pedophilia, among other outrageous things.”

          LOL! We were speaking about this in another thread – how being considerate and nice to the enemy is no way to win a war and that’s why we are going to lose. We have cultural forces from within trying to bring this country down, and they are helping our foreign enemies fight us from the outside.


  8. on December 12, 2012 at 4:41 pm thebechtloff

    I used to really like Tarantino, but damn he’s just become a parody of himself. The day Hollywood makes a movie where the hero is a put upon white boy in an increasingly black and brown neighborhood who goes on a ramapge killing his thug life tormentors, and it’s celebrated in Hollywood and full of big name actors, then and only then, would I even consider shelling out my $9 to see a movie like Django.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 4:51 pm Greg Eliot

      Even when they hint at such a thing, the white hero always has a colored sidekick, adviser, or girlfriend.

      And he’ll invariably kill more “bad” white guys in those interminable mixed-race “gangs” that one sees only on the silver screen.

      Back in the eighties there was an attempt at the genre, Fighting Back, which they never show on TV as a rerun nowadays… they’re too busy rerunning James Bond and Death Wish marathons… and the bi-an nual To Kill A Mockingbird.

      It starred Tom Skerritt… he was some guy in Philadelphia cleaning up the neighborhood… but of course, Yaphet Kotto played “one of the good ones”… and the ultimate fight was against his fellow Italians, specifically, a drug-pushing renegade mobster.


      • on December 12, 2012 at 10:15 pm cynthia

        Or he’s a white supremacist. Like American History X.


        • on December 13, 2012 at 11:54 am Greg Eliot

          Geez, don’t get me started on American History X.


          • on December 13, 2012 at 1:20 pm vacuous1

            The end of that movie kinda proved that Ed Norton was on the right track to start with, didn’t it? Seemed like it backfired in it’s intent.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 4:36 pm Greg Eliot

              That’s what most people don’t get…

              They’re too enthralled with the “good” negro principal and mesmerized by the “oh my gosh, what have I done?!” blood-spattered facial expression of the Crypt-wannabe negro who shoots the little brother.

              They don’t think about the father or the little brother getting killed… or they excuse it somehow because, after all, those two used the taboo “N-word”.
              .


  9. on December 12, 2012 at 5:09 pm thebechtloff

    Falling Down was a little like that too.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 5:14 pm askjoe

      God, the fucking libs hated that movie. But they love them some honkies being murdered.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 5:30 pm Greg Eliot

      Yeah, but they painted the hero as a nutjob… and of course, they had to have the cameo of Frederick Forrest doing a whacked-out queer-hating Nazi that even Michael Douglas wouldn’t tolerate.


      • on December 12, 2012 at 6:50 pm Tyrone

        I agree, that damaged the film. Otherwise, it was a good movie.


        • on December 12, 2012 at 6:55 pm Greg Eliot

          It damaged the film from an aesthetic standpoint… but allowed it to be made and distributed.


    • on December 13, 2012 at 2:34 am pantyfx

      That movie is just an excellent gem. Cheers.


  10. on December 12, 2012 at 5:15 pm SDL

    Gran Torino.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 5:32 pm Greg Eliot

      Puh-leeze!!!

      Just because he called a couple of street thug negros “spooks”?

      That whole movie was pretty much PC antiwhite “Great White Father to the good colored immigants” from start to finish.


      • on December 12, 2012 at 5:55 pm Greg Eliot

        For all the “badass old white man” racial epithets he was allowed to get away with in that movie, the gist of it was summed up in his one line:

        “Jesus… I have more in common with these people than my own family.”

        Thanks for nothing, Clint.


        • on December 12, 2012 at 6:21 pm Josh

          the gist of it was summed up in his one line:

          “Jesus… I have more in common with these people than my own family.”
          ——————————————————–

          But Greg, wasn’t that a true statement he made?

          The real question he did not address is how his own family was perverted because that would require naming the jew.

          They did the bait and switch.


          • on December 12, 2012 at 6:28 pm thebechtloff

            Yeah I actually liked that line. It was a harsh indictment of the SWPL crowd.


            • on December 12, 2012 at 6:46 pm Josh

              Its ironic that the people who are said to have the lowest IQ have the most common sense.

              “Jewston, we have a problem”

              Nigeria is a strongly religious nation whose population is split about equally between Christians and Muslims. Legislation against same-sex relationships enjoys widespread popular support. The vast majority of criticism has come from outside the country, and outside the continent.

              http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/nigeria-to-western-nations-wed-sooner-refuse-aid-than-legalize-same-sex-mar


            • on December 13, 2012 at 12:09 pm Greg Eliot

              Bravo for the Nigerians having the sense not to buy into the whole queer agenda… now they can get back to their e-mail scams and usual negro antics.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 2:20 pm Jason

              Russians/Ukrainians have a thousand more Interweb “antics” than the Nigerians. Ask anyone in IT.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 4:30 pm Hugh G. Rection

              Yeah I think I have received an E-Mail to that effect. A rich, homosexual, nigerian couple wishes to establish residence in a state for purposes of joining in unholy matrimony. As a first step they need a trustworthy person to transfer their considerable fortune to hold in escrow to, for a reasonable 10% commission of course.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 4:41 pm Greg Eliot

              Jason to the rescue again… what a tool!

              First of all, I’ve gotten dozens of Nigerian scams, but never an EE one… be that as it may, yes, I understand that there are all sorts of people doing all sorts of things on the internet and NANALT… thank you very much for bringing that to our attention.

              Second, when I mentioned “negro antics”, I was talking about regular street life in Nigeria (or wherever one can find negroes)… not merely internet scams.

              You know something, if you are actually a white man, and not some snarky cogdis Jew or negro masquerading as an SWPL on the ‘net, you truly are a sorry excuse for a man.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 2:50 am Jason

              If you think I was just talking about phishing … wake up.

              EE is the world center of hacking.

              http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2012/09/18/report-eastern-european-hackers-more-sophisticated-than-asian-counterparts/

              Those are WHITE people committing highly technical crimes. Not a single African mentioned.

              Again, it may pain you to admit this, Greg Eliot, but white people like us can do and have done much more damage to the world than black people.

              That’s a fact. And I’m not any less of a man for saying it.

              Comment? Something even-handed, for a change?


            • on December 14, 2012 at 6:28 pm askjoe

              The rarity when Jason uses his words in a manner that is spot on. All the malware I’ve gotten was from the russian federation. Maybe the email confidence scams come from Africa but straight up hijacking your hardrive and ransoming it comes from crackers.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 9:24 pm josh

              Read up on the Super Virus;its a constantly mutating virus that is put on massive numbers of PC’s across the world. Why? I guess we’ll find out when they decide to let us know. Our best guys are fighting a nonstop war with these guys–and theyre surely not Nigerian;theyre E. European.


  11. on December 12, 2012 at 5:33 pm Anon Reader

    This blog is so fucking awesome. Seriously. Thank you.


  12. on December 12, 2012 at 6:19 pm PA

    New Western logistics will be the lambda of Generation Identitaire, the Hellenic meander of Golden Dawn, and others.


  13. on December 12, 2012 at 6:27 pm thebechtloff

    Ever notice even in movies where a racist white man isn’t protrayed as pure evil he learns by the end the lesson that ‘they aren’t all bad’

    Think that’s how Django will end? With him learning a lesson that just because some white people mistreated him he shouldn’t hold it against a whole race?

    Yeah, me neither.


    • on December 13, 2012 at 8:25 am thwack

      Ever notice even in movies where a racist white man isn’t protrayed as pure evil he learns by the end the lesson that ‘they aren’t all bad’
      ———————
      Theres a reason for that.

      Every “hero”, especially one that employs extreme violence to produce justice, must suffer a revelation; thats how he “grows” as a person. Would you rather your heros lose their humanity by becoming the monsters they seek to destroy?

      Mercy is an alpha trait.

      All you savages should consider yourselves lucky Jesus gave you fools a second chance.

      (((shakin my head)))


      • on December 13, 2012 at 12:07 pm Greg Eliot

        All you savages should consider yourselves lucky Jesus gave you fools a second chance.

        True enough… but as lucky as we whites are for having felt His message and embracing Him, you coloureds are doubly blessed for having been influences by us, and taken (albeit forcefully at times) from your otherwise Satanic and voodoo-ridden existence.


        • on December 14, 2012 at 4:11 am Nicole

          Vodounsi don’t have a Satan. We believe that evil comes from the greed in the heart of man.

          When Europeans went to Africa and saw images of Eshu, they thought we were worshiping Satan because his colors are red and black or white and black, and he is sometimes shown with horns and/or a giant penis. When we tried to explain who he is or what he represents, it scared you because he stands for honor and justice. Murderers and other lowlifes were sacrificed to him. You understood that people who worshiped such a deity would be difficult to exploit.

          You did the same with Nordic and other European as well as Native American deities. You slandered them and sold us this celibate or Gay punk ideal who loves and forgives everybody.

          By your own accounts, Black people are not doing so well under the newly adopted deities, so you didn’t save us from anything. You didn’t save Europeans or Native Americans from anything either.

          So let’s cut to the chase. It’s not White you have a hard on for. If it were, you’d be Odinist Asatru. I respect them and their beliefs about heritage. In that context, they make sense. What you are is a crazy Christian who worships a magical Jew and thinks this makes you superior since everybody who doesn’t believe as you do, you figure is going to hell.

          If you believe some people are going to hell because of thinking, then you are incapable of seeing anything close to rationally in this. It is no surprise then, that you would be confused about your cause.


          • on December 16, 2012 at 2:24 pm Greg Eliot

            Well, try as I might to not bother, some bulls need skewering.

            When Europeans went to Africa and saw images of Eshu, they thought we were worshiping Satan because his colors are red and black or white and black, and he is sometimes shown with horns and/or a giant penis. When we tried to explain who he is or what he represents, it scared you because he stands for honor and justice. Murderers and other lowlifes were sacrificed to him. You understood that people who worshiped such a deity would be difficult to exploit.

            Too laughable to even bother with. Riiiiiiight… it was just “the bad ones” that you voodoo practitioners and idolaters used for sacrifice.

            You did the same with Nordic and other European as well as Native American deities. You slandered them and sold us this celibate or Gay punk ideal who loves and forgives everybody.

            Your blaspheming Christ as a “Gay punk ideal” continues to suss you out as a minion, and it fits in with your other distorted ramblings.

            By your own accounts, Black people are not doing so well under the newly adopted deities, so you didn’t save us from anything. You didn’t save Europeans or Native Americans from anything either.

            Wrong again… sigh, as if this needs further discussion. For all their current woes, negroes and other coloureds continue to do far, far… FAR better in environments provided by the Christian West than when left to their own devices.

            And as has been mentioned ad nauseum here at the chateau and pretty much on every Cyberspace forum, the proof in the pudding is that your kind never fail to seek us out rather than avoid us. When ‘Black Flight’ from white areas is one-tenth the phenomenon as its (now multigenerational) counterpart, then you may start to have a case.

            What you are is a crazy Christian who worships a magical Jew and thinks this makes you superior since everybody who doesn’t believe as you do, you figure is going to hell.

            If you believe some people are going to hell because of thinking, then you are incapable of seeing anything close to rationally in this. It is no surprise then, that you would be confused about your cause.

            This is why I stopped bothering with your posts these past few weeks… because no matter how many times I try to dissuade your mis- and disinformation about what Christianity is, and what I myself believe, you just keep spouting the same ol’ bushwa… it’s tiresome… and after this post, I leave you again to your loved Egyptian night, as Kipling put it.

            This whole “going to hell” thing that you imagine is one of Satan’s biggest lies, used to dishonor God, painting Him as a monster of injustice and torturer.

            I’ve explained the whole “hell” thing before and what it entails, and told you before I won’t keep revisiting what you refuse to acknowledge.

            And instead of being petulant about others “thinking they’re superior” and projecting your own prideful arrogance, a lot more circumspection and humility might be in order… leastwise, a greater reading comprehension about what is actually said, rather than that annoyingly female habit of projecting your own feelings and motives upon what others say.


            • on December 17, 2012 at 1:56 pm Nicole

              So you do worship a magical Jew, and do believe in Satan, but don’t believe in hell, right?

              And you figure that I am one of Satan’s minions, but when I die I’m going to…where exactly?

              And it’s idolatry for us to honor forces of Nature, but not idolatry for you to worship magical Jews?

              I just want to be sure I’ve got it right this time around.


      • on December 13, 2012 at 1:41 pm thebechtloff

        I have no problem with the hero learning. I don’t even necessarily have a problem with the Django movie in and of itself. I imagine a former slave would have some issues with white men. What bothers me is the double standard. As I said before, the moment I see a movie where a put upon white boy in an increasingly brown and black neighborhood slaughters his thug life tormentors and it’s celebrated then I will have no problem with a movie like Django.


        • on December 13, 2012 at 2:45 pm NiteLily

          That’s why you shouldn’t support such movies/products. I have “a don’t-support” list and I don’t support anyone on that list.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 9:26 pm josh

            Out,cunt!


      • on December 13, 2012 at 7:07 pm Hugh G. Rection

        You got kind of a point there thwack, but that’s got more to do with Hollywoods desire to have a happy ending. I far more like stories where the “hero” gets corrupted more and more and consumed and changed by his heroics, not humbled by the process. Think shows like “Breaking Bad”…


      • on December 14, 2012 at 2:12 am NiteLily

        “Mercy is an alpha trait.”

        So true. I always said there is more to you than meets the eye.


  14. on December 12, 2012 at 6:34 pm Josh

    I think you white people are making a big deal about nothing. Tarantino does not make movies, he makes cartoons.

    Thats all this is.

    White men on the other hand, don’t need cartoons because they slam niggas heads through plate glass windows in real life!

    Thats no joke and niggers know it.

    Its because nonwhite people are afraid of white people that white people can afford to make a CARTOON about nonwhite people killing white people.

    Its childs play.

    And you white guys gettin all butt hurt like it means anything…

    LOL!


    • on December 12, 2012 at 6:52 pm Greg Eliot

      Thwack’s brother (or sockpuppet) appears to have found the back door to the chateau.


      • on December 12, 2012 at 7:15 pm corvinus

        Sockpuppet. The gravatar is the same. You don’t need to pretend to be somebody else, T-dog, we know it’s you.


        • on December 13, 2012 at 1:04 pm Matthew King (King A)

          Good catch. The whiteface grease is running. Joshua N. Thwack exposed!


      • on December 12, 2012 at 10:36 pm thwack

        No thats me.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 7:51 pm Canadian Friend

      All statistics on crimes contradict what josh said

      blacks commit violent crimes against whites a LOT more than the reverse, in fact whites attacking blacks is a very rare occurence in comparison


      • on December 12, 2012 at 10:53 pm thwack

        blacks commit violent crimes against whites a LOT more than the reverse,
        ——————-
        When is the last time some nonwhite people dropped a nuclear bomb on some white people?

        Have you ever heard of “Agent Orange?”

        White people murder millions of nonwhite people every year with nothing more than the stroke of a pen.

        “we don’t kill our enemies; we make our enemies kill each other” A.Wyatt Mann


        • on December 13, 2012 at 7:26 pm Skunk

          You had to change the subject in order to find even an ineffectual rebuttal.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 3:55 am Nicole

            Astounding that someone would view that as a change of subject.

            I am thoroughly convinced that this is some kind of brain defect that becomes the norm after a few hundred years of culling the critical thinkers.

            Technically, you are right though. It’s not as if any of those of you who were duped were actually responsible for the atrocities committed by your leaders. Can’t blame the sheep for grazing where the shepherd led them.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 9:42 am TheBestMan

              It definately is a change of subject. non-whites have not been in a position to dominate whites, due most likely to some kind of mental inferiority, regardless of a moral or altruistic comparison that can’t be made because to put it simply, niggers could never have invented the atom bomb….Thwack is actually subtly complementing whites and doesn’t realise it….i mean look at what happens when niggers get their hands on a measly hand gun..violence+crime at a rate far greater than whites in the same very situations.Thwack’s point (if he has any) seems to be that whites are more powerful and better at getting shit done.

              We knew this already


            • on December 15, 2012 at 1:15 pm Nicole

              TheBestMan, what you’re saying would make sense only if nearly every non White person were poor, unintelligent, and ignorant, and every White person was rich, intelligent, and well educated (self or institutionally). This is simply not the case.

              It is just that of the known richest people on Earth, many happen to be White, but definitely not all. Of the U.S. defined Whites, many are not western European. This is simply not a world run by Whites. You’re told that to sustain a belief in privilege that is, as I keep saying, an illusion tailored to shape your interest to support the establishment. It’s easier to control you through your ego than it is to tell you the truth of how things work in this world.


    • on December 16, 2012 at 5:12 pm Lucky White Male

      Listen you blacks, enjoy your mastubatory “revenge fantasy” while it lasts, closest you will get in reality.

      Whites are the Alpha. You are the Beta. I will allow you to exist in my society, but please remember your place

      Carry on, while I smoke my cigar…


  15. on December 12, 2012 at 7:00 pm PA

    LOL at old Western logos. The new Western logos will be: the lambda of Generacion Identitaire, the Hellenic meander of Golden Dawn, and others.


    • on December 13, 2012 at 1:20 pm Matthew King (King A)

      You’re forgetting Constantine’s Chi-Rho.

      LOL at old Western logos. The new Western logos will be…

      The “old Western logos” is the new Western ΛΟΓΟΣ, the Α and the Ω, from before the foundation of the world, now and forever, Ιησούς Χριστός (cf. John 1:1, “In the beginning was the Word (λόγος)…”).

      I preach the Christ crucified and resurrected.

      Matt


      • on December 13, 2012 at 4:45 pm Greg Eliot

        In Hoc Signo Vinces


      • on December 14, 2012 at 3:30 pm Jason

        You don’t preach anything by calling other people “cunts”.

        Hypocrite.


        • on December 14, 2012 at 3:35 pm corvinus

          Jesus Christ called the pharisees and others bad words all the time.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 3:56 pm Greg Eliot

            Indeed… He called His own best friend “Satan” when a strong rebuke was merited.

            On a lighter note: Every time alphie boy attempts a shame, it blows up in his pasty face.

            You’d think he’d know when to quit… then again, masochism is a hallmark trait of the SWPL,


            • on December 14, 2012 at 5:17 pm Jason

              Considering the pwning that you’ve taken in the past, I’d say it goes both ways.


            • on December 15, 2012 at 8:26 pm Greg Eliot

              The pwnings you imagine me to have taken here at the chateau only occur in the recesses of the minds of you and other useful idiots and cogdis operatives.

              In sweet science parlance, the initial jab that is then countered by a hook to the ribs and a staggering uppercust to the jaw doesn’t not score equally on the cards of the judges.


            • on December 15, 2012 at 8:28 pm Greg Eliot

              Hell, uppercut and does not score equally.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 5:17 pm Jason

            Bible citation, corvinus? Please enlighten me.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 5:38 pm corvinus

              John 8:44, John 8:55, Matthew 23:27. And remember, Jesus wasn’t speaking English; this is a translation of a translation of a translation, so the full punch isn’t apparent.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 6:15 pm Jason

              Thanks for the quotes, but my question was in jest.

              The Bible has passed through so many different mouths that the original stories are gone.

              My professor in college literally wrote the Bible. The New American Bible — he was on the committee. Even HE admitted that people who interpret it literally are misguided.

              Again, thanks, but we’ll never know whether Jesus used whatever word “cunt” translates to in Aramaic.

              That’s why Matt King is the worst kind of religious hypocrite — a hateful cusser who piously drops to one knee (whenever the spirit moves him) and declares that the resurrected Christ is his Lord and Savior.

              I’ve got a LOT of experience taking on his type. (cracks knuckles) And this alpha loves to fight.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 6:20 pm NiteLily

              “And remember, Jesus wasn’t speaking English; this is a translation of a translation of a translation, so the full punch isn’t apparent.”

              Which is why much of the New Testament is not accurate, and that’s why we need to study Judaism to understand the true meaning of Christianity. Too many people take too many liberties with the truth.


            • on December 15, 2012 at 8:31 pm Greg Eliot

              I’ve got a LOT of experience taking on his type. (cracks knuckles) And this alpha loves to fight.

              LLOOZOZOZOZOZOZLLLLLL

              For every time you’ve lost a round to me, Matt has TKO’d you within 30 seconds of the first round.

              Geez, the only fighting you do here is akin to Paul Newman vs. George Kennedy in Cool Hand Luke… you’re game enough, at times, but even the spectators lose heart at seeing the slaughter.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 9:40 pm josh

            “Verily art the Pharisees a bunch of assholes”


  16. on December 12, 2012 at 7:14 pm Dan Fletcher

    Django?

    Give me a full length version of this instead:

    [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWpK0wsnitc&w=560&h=315%5D


    • on December 12, 2012 at 10:13 pm Tyrone

      That was cool.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 10:14 pm Unending Improvement (@UnendImprov)

      Even that has a “mixed race gang”, although at least it’s not preachy SWPL bullshit like a Tarantino cartoon.


    • on December 13, 2012 at 2:47 am pantyfx

      Punisher all day every day ;D


    • on December 15, 2012 at 10:42 am Matthew King (King A)

      Why was he putting dirty clothes into the dryer?

      UNREALISTIC!


  17. on December 12, 2012 at 8:02 pm JonBrom

    No doubt at all that there will be white people murdered by black crazies”inspired” by this movie. The millions Tarantino will make will be stained by the blood of innocents.

    Like he cares.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 8:20 pm Canadian Friend

      Some of us back in 2008 had predicted electing Obama would embolden many blacks and there would be a rise in crimes committed by blacks

      We were right and we expect the situation to get worse in the coming years

      I say “we” because i do not pretend to have been the one to come up with this prediction, although back in 2008 I felt damn lonely saying those things almost no one else was saying

      how things have changed!
      now more and more people have opened their eyes to this war on whitey and are openly talking about it everywhere on the internet

      Anyone who knows anything about the world knows that everywhere blacks have pushed aside whites, they have also turned violent on those whites.

      things are going to get ugly in coming years

      I’m glad I’m in Canada in a safe region that is over 99% white


      • on December 13, 2012 at 2:39 am Hamster Tamer

        SO… you’re not gonna come on down and HELP us during The Troubles??? Remember, John C. Garand was a Canadian! ;^)


  18. on December 12, 2012 at 9:48 pm Hans Castorp (@TheBigHans)

    I wouldn’t trust ANY woman, nevermind a man, who willfully bought a ticket and liked this movie. Then again, I once dumped a girl after finding out she dated a black dude. Call me old fashioned.


    • on December 12, 2012 at 10:33 pm thwack

      Then again, I once dumped a girl after finding out she dated a black dude.
      ———–

      “Theres only one thing worse than a nigger and thats a nigger lover” –
      A. Wyatt Mann


    • on December 13, 2012 at 2:54 am whorefinder

      Nah, I was once involved with (i.e. fucking) a Russian hottie who I was considering dating. I would swear and be racist a lot in front of her, and she’d just giggle. One of her favorite pastimes (both for laughs and to try to get me to date her) was to tell me stories about the guys she met online dating or at work who asked her out (she worked at a department store).

      We’d talk about how they took her on several dates, and she knew from the beginning she wasn’t going to sleep with them, and was just using them for dinner, dates, and her ego. (We, on the other hand, had met when I wolf whistled and catcalled her off my front porch late one night after she’d been drinking. We’d had a casual get-drunk-and-fuck thing going ever since.) I’d call them losers and then cum on her face.

      But just when she almost had me, I called Obama a nigger, and she laughed, but said, “But I dated a black guy once.”

      lmao. thanks for saving me, honey.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 5:03 pm Canadian Friend

        It is getting harder finding white women who have not dated or had sex with at least one black guy, it seems they all want to try a black at least once you know like the new ride at the circus or a new item on a menu or something

        Some say it exactly like that: “I wanted to try it with a black guy out of curiosity” and then they say ” nah not for me , I prefer white guys”


        • on December 15, 2012 at 8:05 am whorefinder

          Yeah, agreed. Except now they’re a lot stupider, and think they can mention it and have it be ok. Kind of like admitting that they slept around—they really aren’t that well trained that guys really aren’t all that copacetic on your slutting it up,. Really, we’d prefer you;d be a virgin, and a nigger-phobic one at that.

          Once upon a time, girls knew this, so, in one sense, they make it a lot easier today to find out if they’re pump-and-dumps. Thanks p.c.-ness and feminism!

          Black guys used to tell stories about white women “trolling” black ghettos to try nigger cock, and hiding it later. Whilst usually blown out of proportion and mostly lies (like all jigaboo stories), its less true today because girls feel like they’re protected by the p.c. police and can openly sleep around with the monkeys.

          Laughably.


    • on December 14, 2012 at 1:56 am Anon

      I dumped a girl once because I found out she dated a dude. Call me prehistoric.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 2:04 am Greg Eliot

        Was he a greenhorn or a cheechawker?


        • on December 14, 2012 at 6:54 pm Anon

          Had to look your shit up.
          Is it really WoW related? I thought you held me in such high estime…


          • on December 14, 2012 at 8:26 pm Anonymous

            Those are just old cowboy terms for “dude” or non-cowboy newcomers.


  19. on December 12, 2012 at 10:38 pm DeNihilist

    WTF?


  20. on December 13, 2012 at 7:50 am Paul

    This site has some good advice on game. A lot of clueless chest thumping racists though. You guys need to get on youtube and listen to “Carl sagan – pale blue dot”. Carl is undoubtedly, one of the greatest ” white ” minds to grace this planet, taht monologue might help you put things in perspective. Too much energy being spent on shit that does not fucking matter. One insignificant dot in the vast universe and yet the inhabitants —instead of actively working together to support life and prosperity in the planet—-ceaselessly try to outdo each other, occasionally wiping out large swathes of the population and making up reasons to do so along the way ……its fucking ridiculous. Heartiste seems to be a smart man ( of course no where near the intellect of the great Dr Sagan, not even in the same universe..) so I dont understand where this race nonsense comes from. It would be more fitting coming from an illiterate backwoods redneck

    [Heartiste: What's more relevant to our lives: knowledge that the earth is a tiny blue dot in an infinite sea of space, or the guy living next door to us?]


    • on December 13, 2012 at 2:58 pm NiteLily

      “insignificant dot in the vast universe and yet the inhabitants —instead of actively working together to support life and prosperity in the planet—-ceaselessly try to outdo each other,”

      You’re preaching to the wrong choir dude. Our culture is being bombarded by forces not looking to work together with us for a greater purpose. They want to replace us, and in the process they will bring down humanity so that Carl Sagan types will not spring up. You should take this to the left and the 3rd world, which it incessantly fights for. We’re not in the wrong here. We’re being wronged.


      • on December 13, 2012 at 3:24 pm anononononno

        atheist bullshit like that logically leads to recognition of the tribal realities that he’s too scared to acknowledge (because that’s redneck stuff). Better to be a cocooned swpl until you get stabbed to death on a bus in baltimore or are a victim of the punching game.


    • on December 13, 2012 at 3:21 pm anononononno

      look, idiot, it’s not that there are people of other races coming into this country, or into western countries. It’s that they’re being radicalized into voting and acting on a purely tribal basis instead of being acclimated and integrated into their new countries. It’s ignoring that the Euros who were on the forefront of this radical plan are now realizing that multiculturalism and welfare statism have failed.

      It doesn’t help that whites that are flush with white guilt are unable to even recognize or acknowledge the crime waves these immigrants bring with them. Better to just bitch about some hypothetical illiterate hillbilly you only know of because Hollywood has created a white boogey man to be scared of.


    • on December 13, 2012 at 4:59 pm Greg Eliot

      Carl Sagan, eh… hmmmmmm… what tribe is he a member of? Same as you, Paulie?

      Always pimping and pumping up your own… but when the goyim are racially-aware, they’re just mentally deficient, eh?

      It’s getting so one can’t swing a dead cat around the chateau without hitting, well… you know.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 2:19 am NiteLily

        He doesn’t have to be “pimping and pumping up your own.” His own speak for themselves, and no amount of you minimizing their contributions will change reality. LMAO!!!! Your hate of the Jew is jealousy-based, and really very juvenile.


        • on December 14, 2012 at 2:30 am Greg Eliot

          Your stalking of my posts and continued fractured-fairy-tale-history-cum- just-jealous litany is what’s jew-venile.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 2:51 am NiteLily

            LOL! What happened, can’t keep your word? You said you ain’t replying to me no more. It’s too good to pass, eh?


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:01 am Greg Eliot

              You forgot to say neener-neener… were you at least thumbing your nose between keystrokes?


          • on December 14, 2012 at 2:55 am Jason

            NiteLily just doesn’t like your hatred. Neither do I. I’ve seen enough of it in real life.

            Spew hate elsewhere.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:06 am Greg Eliot

              And there are many others here who don’t particular care for your brand of inanity and fellow traveler apologetics… which are far more heinous a form of hate than any of my defenses against the antiwhite racists and neocon lickspittles.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:29 am Nicole

              Nobody here is anti White. We’re just mostly anti Santa in the sky and other brands of absurd Nature denial. Belief that being White affords you some kind of exemption from Nature is just one of many pretty lies people who frequent this site tend to be hostile towards.

              Most of the time, it’s hard to tell what it is exactly that you’re defending. White culture? The culture that brought us institutionalized feminism, and encourages most people in the west to adopt extremely self destructive dependence on corporations?

              You’re defending ideologies that you and your progeny will never profit from. It’s like you’re afflicted with some kind of Cinderella syndrome where you honestly believe that your pale skin will someday mean that you or yours have a shot at being in the big leagues.

              When someone knows how the world works, one views people like you rightfully as ignorants spewing hatred at the people who are in no way responsible for whatever suffering you feel you’re doing. The reason why things are bad for White people today is because, wake up little princess, they have always been so. The people at the top have always shit on the people at the bottom, and the only difference between now and the old days is that they no longer have interest in sustaining the illusion of White privilege.

              Get over it. Your being White never meant more than being a useful idiot. Accept the truth and move forward.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:38 am NiteLily

              Exactly! It’s getting tiresome. Everything is the Jew, Jew, Jew. Even when there is no whiff of him around, they still find ways to inject him. It’s an obsessive irrational hatred lacking objectivity. It’s one thing to criticize, but quite another to demonize. Nazi propaganda was all about demonizing the Jew – turning him into a sexual and money Lecher. That’s what he does here too. It’s getting old.


            • on December 15, 2012 at 8:10 am whorefinder

              Sweetheart! How is my little bitch doing?

              P.s. Michael Clarke Duncan deserved to die. And saturated fat does not cause heart disease.

              You’re welcome, little man. :P


    • on December 15, 2012 at 8:07 am whorefinder

      Shorter Paul: “I’m so deep! Only idiots believe in race! Black people are oppressed, they aren’t the number one cause of crime! Racist! Racist! Racist!”

      Back to your Obama rally, little dick!


  21. on December 13, 2012 at 7:54 am gig

    I love how people instinctively draw the French crown whenever they have to draw a random crown. No matter how many pictures of other crowns you see, everybody has in mind La Couronne de France

    the Fleur de Lis leaves no doubt. The revolution may have beheaded the King, but two hundred years later people are still in awe before the House of Capet


    • on December 15, 2012 at 11:01 am Matthew King (King A)

      That’s not a “random crown.” It’s the Tudor Crown. Its image was an official royal symbol up until 1953, when QE2 replaced it with the St. Edward’s Crown.

      The fleurs-de-lis reflect the old Plantagenet claim to the French throne, not some cartoonist’s imagining of a generic crown, much less “awe before the House of Capet,” frog.

      Now if you’ll excuse me, I have a plate of hot freedom fries waiting.

      Matt


  22. on December 13, 2012 at 8:02 am gig

    Then again, I once dumped a girl after finding out she dated a black dude.

    That is as big as a red flag can be. Unless she says “I have a STD”, she can’t say anything worse


    • on December 13, 2012 at 12:02 pm Greg Eliot

      Once they go black, we don’t want them back.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 12:28 pm stevie tellatruth

        Heh. That’s because you KNOW they not coming back.


        • on December 14, 2012 at 1:43 pm Greg Eliot

          Negroes gonna neg.


        • on December 15, 2012 at 8:14 am whorefinder

          lmao rofl. You nigs are hilarious in your denial.

          Here’s a test: watch a mudshark’s face/reaction when a guy tells her he won’t date her because she slept with a sub-human. Or watch a woman hearing a guy say that.The twisted distortion, the utter devastation, the panic, and the depression seem to come all at once.

          A non-black woman who sleeps with a nigs is literally into bestiality. Monkey-fucking whores aren’t even worth a first date.


          • on December 16, 2012 at 7:56 am thwack

            whorefinder
            Here’s a test: watch a mudshark’s face/reaction when a guy tells her he won’t date her because she slept with a sub-human.
            ————————
            There is only one thing worse than a sub-human, and thats a sub-human lover.

            So let me get this straight: you are saying that a white girl can have had 8000 dicks in her but as long as she never fucked a black guy, she gets the Snow White merit badge from you?

            Thats the best definition of a “lose lose” situation I have heard in a long time. I guess thats why nobody makes white condoms.


            • on December 16, 2012 at 11:23 am whorefinder

              lmao rofl.

              Ah, nigs, so stupid. No wonder your people are in the ghetto permanently, eating their own poop. Here’s something for your simple, “Malcolm-X-was-a-genius” brain:

              Stating that a mudshark scrapes the bottom of the barrel does not imply that non-mudshark whores are somehow “Snow White.”

              Nigs will be trying to understand that for days. Let’s watch.


    • on December 15, 2012 at 8:11 am whorefinder

      Exactly.


  23. on December 13, 2012 at 10:18 am thwack

    The “joke” is that white people take themselves so seriously that they think their possible genetic annihilation is of such consequence that it could be somebody’s ultimate reason for being.

    Get over yourselves white man.


    • on December 13, 2012 at 12:01 pm Greg Eliot

      The “joke” is that white people take themselves so seriously…

      The “tragedy” is that we never took your ilk seriously enough… to rid ourselves of your odious presence when it would have been relatively easy… and certainly more humane for both parties, than what the future holds.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 3:49 am Nicole

        Ah yes. Many Native Americans now say the same thing about Europeans. Compared to Black people, Whites have been and still are a much more destructive force in the Americas.

        Talk about kicking out the unwelcome when you’ve packed your bags too.


        • on December 14, 2012 at 9:54 am Alexander

          Everybody fights for themselves, you see.
          If you don’t – you’ll get crushed by others. It’s simple as that.
          When whites fought for American land they did it for themselves.

          By the way the diseases(90% brought by whites unintentionally) killed most of the Indians, not the arms of Whites.

          The land belongs to the one who can claim it.
          Speaking of the destructive forces, you think Indians were Avatar like nature lovers? No; they were whites in red skin(even worse – human sacirficing…)

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sacrifice_in_pre-Columbian_cultures

          If they had been on the same organizational and technological level, they would have done it to Europe(or Africa, or whatever, you get the point)

          They surely are victims but only because they didn’t had the means to be aggressors.
          It’s happening, and will be happening as long as there is Earth, all that change are the perpetrators.

          Any given nation or people on Earth has at some point in their history conquered the land they are now inhabiting. ANY GIVEN.
          My point of view is that if the nation was majority on some territory for more than hundred years, let it be considered their land, just for the record of history, nothing else.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 11:04 am thwack

            “If they had been on the same organizational and technological level, they would have done it to Europe(or Africa, or whatever, you get the point)”
            ————————————————————

            The above is a common technique white people use to justify their practice of racism. Its a type of “moral equivocation” that while it sounds good; does not reflect the behaviors of white people and nonwhite people.

            White peoples fear of nonwhite people is unique and in some ways justified because of their genetic disposition. As a nonwhite person, Im not sure I can ever fully comprehend the nature of this fear because as a nonwhite person, I can never experience this for lack of a better term “white genetic annihilation”.

            In addition, my sense of self; or better yet, my sense of self worth is NOT wrapped up so much in my physical characteristics as much as it is in my thoughts and ability to communicate and imagine…

            Would I be a smarter person if I looked like a white person? (defining “smart” as the ability to do more things)

            Probably; because in a system of white supremacy, white people are encouraged and allowed to do more things; this is why a younger white person can be smarter than an older nonwhite person.

            White people go more places and do more things.

            Would I be a smarter person in a system of justice instead of a system of racism?

            Of course. Everybody would be smarter. Not only that, the music would be better, the food would be better… even the sex would be better.

            In some ways, white people are the ultimate niggers because racism is a form of limited thinking (limited to thinking about niggers) that retards white peoples ability to consider and explore any further than the “white box” they have produced and placed themselves inside of to be “king of the box!”

            It only seems impressive to those inside the box.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 4:56 pm Alexander

              “The above is a common technique white people use to justify their practice of racism. Its a type of “moral equivocation” that while it sounds good; does not reflect the behaviors of white people and nonwhite people.”

              Firstly it’s not a technique, it’s a conviction gained from observing the reality.

              Also most of the white people don’t think like this, so don’t worry. They like to think that most of the world was something like the garden of Eden until the white man came.

              It doesn’t even has to reflect the behavior of other people toward the whites, we can observe how do they treat each other, and than make it in our minds at least 3x worst if a white was in a place of a victim. Or not 3x.
              Whatever, what we can already see is pretty much enough, not to allow you the upper hand over us.

              What has though been an exception is treatment of white missionaries in African states, but than again, I can compare it to black people coming to my home country in Europe.
              When some of them arrives in the town, behaves like the rest of us, has the same values, and has no ghetto mentality(treats all the same, regardless of race), we tend to like him, especially since he’s black, it’s kind a interesting.
              If on the other hand like in our capital comes a lot of them, and they keep together and create “us against them “ frame, and tend to emulate their tribal behavior(of course adapted to new environment, but still irritating), than we see they won’t even try to be like us, and that they are like foreign object in our national body, often not even trying to do anything for the community.

              “In addition, my sense of self; or better yet, my sense of self worth is NOT wrapped up so much in my physical characteristics as much as it is in my thoughts and ability to communicate and imagine…”

              All right if you say so, but your brethren haven’t been of the same thought as you claim to be.
              They simply are defined by their skin(and culture, and mentality and it sometime seems that it’s inseparable). If you are minority in some middles, you assimilate and you have no problems.
              If you’re numerous you ghettoize, and you became the problem – or at least the large part of it.

              “Probably; because in a system of white supremacy, white people are encouraged and allowed to do more things; this is why a younger white person can be smarter than an older nonwhite person.”

              Well what can I say? America is presented as a land of the same opportunities for everybody willing to make it. Chris Gardner is the first example that comes to mind.
              I think it’s kind a chain that blacks are in; your own community discourages you to make it, and to assimilate into the white society, and than the whites don’t look you with the keen eye because you behave and express yourself in the ways you’ve been taught in your hood, even if you try not to… Working habits and other innate things give you away, so you may look thugish.
              Escape the environment and you have better chances of success.

              “… that retards white peoples ability to consider and explore any further than the “white box” they have produced and placed themselves inside of to be “king of the box!”
              It only seems impressive to those inside the box.”

              I wouldn’t agree, since you’re in that box too, and yet don’t seem impressed at all.
              You have your black boxes, like mentality, and subculture that successfully stop you from making it in the USA.


          • on December 15, 2012 at 1:46 pm Nicole

            Alexander, I don’t particularly care to make this a moral debate because humans, in general, suck. I’m just saying that a dead baby is a dead baby, whether it’s dead from being offered to the Spirits or dead because Senior Whatshisface hadn’t bathed in 10 years and leaves a trail of filth in his wake, or dead from inhaling toxic fumes from a factory. The bodycount is what it is, and Europeans in the Americas have caused much more of it than anyone else.

            What’s worse is that all the while the illusion of privilege is ringing in their ears, their kids are being miseducated and poisoned. So they’ve sold their interest politically at the expense of their interests personally. Sad and stupid…not superior and not entitled to anything more than the hell they’ve created for themselves.


            • on December 15, 2012 at 4:46 pm Alexander

              Dead baby is a dead baby, but what matters is, is it yours or not. This is brutal, but it’s in the very essence of what i’m saying on that subject in two previous posts.

              Example is simple to make: USA is having a grip on the Middle eastern countries for the oil, and it forces countries there to fall in line with what USA decides(at least those countries that matter).
              If USA wouldn’t do that it would have risked social turbulence at home(energetic crises – whole economy may crumble) – and if it would continue for longer time than your children would be killed instead of Middle Eastern.

              Also there is a power play. If USA withdraws from the ME, China or India, or Japan or some other force will take it’s place, and USA will be weaker and these countries will be stronger and more dominant.
              That in turn means that USA will be less able to enforce it’s interests in the world and less capable of obtaining things that it needs. That also means less influential – and with that American products will be less competative on the world market = again more social instability, plus these nations will became greater threats to the USA.

              China isn’t growing as fast as it could because they require more oil and energy in general, which the USA and the other players deny Chinese an access to, so China than finds partners that are at odds with the USA and the rest of the world i.e. Sudan and Iran – that doesn’t have good logistics and thus suck, and now imagine USA withdraw from ME. EU is a militarily weakling.

              It is very hard to say or to discern who’s death is worth it. War in Vietnam was a mistake as we can see, many South Vietnamese and Americans died for nothing, yet if whole of the Vietnam became red in the 1968? They would import war and “revolution” to Thailand, and Malesya – and you would again have many dead, also USSR threat would became even greater, if Malasya and Myanmar and maybe Indonesia became communist… Than Australia too gets in deep troubles(not of revolution, but of external invasion)…

              You see where i’m heading? It may has had turned to that, and it may had not. It’s a gamble, a gamble with heads. Now choose with whose heads will it be? Will you allow them to gamble with heads of your nation or family?
              You could always say it doesn’t has to be that way, China may disintegrate, Vietnamese may have lost interest for Thailand, and so on… And what if they don’t?


      • on December 14, 2012 at 6:11 pm Canadian Friend

        In French we say ” there is always one pulling on the blanket” which means that whenever two parties claim they will from now on be fair to each other, there is always one that pulls on the blanket ( as if you were in bed with the other party and there was one small blanket for the two of you )

        Whites in the last decades have offered blacks a new deal where everybody would treat the other as equal but blacks wnat far more than that,

        just the same as with unions, at first they wanted to be treated fairly but have now become drunk with power and have become the oppressors

        Black and whites living in perfect harmony will never happen, one of the two will always want to dominate the other

        this is basic, this is human nature

        and if those are the only tow choices, I’d rather be on the side of the oppressor than be oppressed,


        • on December 14, 2012 at 8:55 pm thwack

          Canadian Friend
          Whites in the last decades have offered blacks a new deal where everybody would treat the other as equal
          ————————————————–

          Native Americans say: “white he speakum with forked tongue… he say one thing, he do another”


          • on December 14, 2012 at 9:33 pm josh

            Native American running casino say to da black man,”GTFO!You aint no fuckin Indian,muthafukka!!” LOL!


          • on December 15, 2012 at 9:57 am Alexander

            Strange, we said the same about them too.


          • on December 16, 2012 at 11:33 am whorefinder

            Notably, Nigs now speaks for all AmerIndians.

            Hey nigs, do you know what an adverb is yet?

            lol.


  24. on December 13, 2012 at 11:14 am Uncle Elmer

    So I googled “quentin tarantino biography”. Don’t see where this man has had any exposure to actual blacks other than cartoons like Denzel Warshington. He grew up in Torrance and “Harbor City” California, then went into the film industry. Somebody help me out, are those places like Compton or Watts?

    Likely if he ever lived and worked among them he would be doing a remake of “Birth of a Nation”, or otherwise calling for basketball-orange freight cars.

    If you go to see the film you are advised not to chastise any black gentlemen who are talking loudly or otherwise being inconsiderate of the rest of the film-goers.


  25. on December 13, 2012 at 11:36 am Uncle Elmer

    Speaking of film reviews, I considered doing a thumbs-up Spearhead review of “The Wrestler” after seeing this news item :

    Keeping underwraps: Mickey Rourke hides his surgically altered face with a beanie and sunglasses as he steps out with younger girlfriend

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2246770/Mickey-Rourke-hides-surgically-altered-face-beanie-sunglasses-steps-younger-girlfriend.html

    The man is an inspiration.


    • on December 13, 2012 at 11:50 am Greg Eliot

      Yeah, he should have won the Oscar for that performance in The Wrestler… I think he was 55 years old at the time, maybe even a year or two older… amazingly difficult physical role on top of the acting.

      Unfortunately, he was up against Sean Penn playing a Jew queer… guess who wins in Tinseltown.


      • on December 13, 2012 at 1:53 pm Matthew King (King A)

        Unfortunately, he was up against Sean Penn playing a Jew queer…

        You forgot “assassinated” and “martyred.”

        That histrionic, Chavez-cock-chugging hack won his two academy awards in the two biggest tragishamockeries in the history of that entire supercilious event: beating Rourke, as mentioned, and beating Bill Murray in Lost in Translation.

        Penn is a pussy and a traitor, whatever, but he is also the most overrated over-acting dinner-theater player in the history of Hollywood.

        “Is that my child in there? IS THAT MY DAUGHTER IN DAAAAHHHHRRRREE!!!!???!!!! GAHHHHLGHHAHHHAHHHGHH!!!!!”

        Oscar gold!

        Much better acting in the same dramatic situation by some minimum wage stiff on a basic cable TV show. [Can't find the unedited clip online.]

        Matt


        • on December 13, 2012 at 3:06 pm NiteLily

          Sean Penn is another one on my do-not-support list. I can’t stand him. BTW, Greg, he isn’t Jewish. Did you hear, not everyone in Hollywood is Jewish.


          • on December 13, 2012 at 5:07 pm Greg Eliot

            Did you hear, not everyone in Hollywood is Jewish.

            They just play one… or play up to them… if they know what’s good for ‘em and want to get the kudos and continued work.

            You tiresome cunt, I’ve already said doesn’t of times that we’re all well aware NAJALT and there are plenty of gentile fellow travelers worthy of the rope.

            Aw, shit… I broke my promise not to reply to Harpy Bizarre anymore.

            Moderator, do your duty! Ban me.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 10:17 pm Greg Eliot

              Hell, dozens


            • on December 14, 2012 at 2:50 pm thwack

              Greg Eliot
              Did you hear, not everyone in Hollywood is Jewish.

              They just play one… or play up to them… if they know what’s good for ‘em and want to get the kudos and continued work.
              —————————
              Ah yes… The “Karen Johnson” effect…
              After submitting many resumes and never getting a call, A certain black female actress decided to change her name to Whoopie GOLDBERG. The rest is history


          • on December 13, 2012 at 8:35 pm Anonymous

            Says you.


            • on December 13, 2012 at 8:38 pm corvinus

              Yup, looks like NiteLily got owned about Sean Penn there…


            • on December 13, 2012 at 10:16 pm Greg Eliot

              She gets pwned on every stupid word that spews forth from her keyboard.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 2:28 am NiteLily

              If I’m wrong, I will stand corrected.

              However, a quarter Jewish from his father side, doesn’t constitute a Jew. He has some Jewish ancestry, as many Gentile Americans do. Hell, many Germans have Jewish blood too, and they served with Hitler, as he soon realized they were too numerous to get rid of all of them because that meant many good Germans will have to go to the gas chambers. Even Hitler realize, some Jewish blood doesn’t constitute Jewish.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 2:34 am NiteLily

              “She gets pwned on every stupid word that spews forth from her keyboard.”

              So far, you haven’t been effective against me. You have only succeeded in making me laugh at your anger, which I have elicited. Tell me, does your wife see you all bent out of shape because you look like the irrational idiot you are? I am sure your blood pressure has shot up too. You need to relax and stop spewing your bullshit.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 2:39 am Greg Eliot

              On a point of curiosity…

              For someone who accuses others of Hitler worship, you never fail to regale with long-winded screeds about the man… with far more information, both real and imagined, and what he did or didn’t do, what he did or didn’t stand for, etc., etc., etc. than anyone here at the chateau.

              Recently, you started doing the same about Wagner, up to and including outhouse speculation about his motives and life with Cosima.

              How is it, for an alleged non-Jew, that your hare-brained interest in these areas is so voluminous, albeit the majority of which is either misinformation or disinformation?

              Why is that, girl?


            • on December 14, 2012 at 2:44 am Greg Eliot

              So far, you haven’t been effective against me. You have only succeeded in making me laugh at your anger, which I have elicited.

              May I refresh your memory about who was the first to issue an

              LLLOZOZOZOZOZZLLLLLL

              And as far as anger goes, it would appear I’ve elicited a far, far, FAR greater amount from you… not to mention keystrokes.

              As far as reactions from spouses, well… you have me at an unfair advantage there, in that I can’t ask you about yours… since no man could possibly tolerate your presence for long in the meat world, let alone think of marriage.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:06 am NiteLily

              No man can tolerate me, why because I give you shit? LOL! I hate lies. I have high ideals, which means I love accuracy and truth. Therefore, I can sniff ulterior motives like a bomb squad, whether it’s coming from radical leftists or Nazi aspirants.

              But, I am much more subdued and submissive in real life, since in real life most people don’t speak like we do here, neither you nor me. I will give credit for i n s p i r i n g me.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:12 am Greg Eliot

              Thus far you’ve evinced little ability to discern either accuracy or truth… except, of course, in that twisted and painfully subjective feminine way, in which reality-in-my-mind-is-reality-enough.

              But I do believe you when you say that you couldn’t possibly talk to men this way in the real world… you’d soon tire of getting ridiculed or smacked where ere you go.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:14 am Jason

              I had always thought that Sean Penn was a self-absorbed child …

              … UNTIL I read about what he did in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, and the months he’s spent trying to help people in the hellhole that is currently Port-au-Prince.

              That dude’s for real. He’s got a big heart.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:24 am NiteLily

              LOL! Dismiss me as a female all you want, I never get offended by that. BUT, my facts speak for themselves.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 7:40 am Matthew King (King A)

              Hey you guys come on!!! Read this …

              http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/12/intellectual-discourse-taking.html

              … then kiss and make-up or grudgefuck.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 6:33 pm NiteLily

              “Why is that, girl?”

              None of what I have said about either one of your heroes – Hitler and Wagner – is misinformation. It’s true and well documented. What you are trying to do is rehabilitate their image without them meriting such magnanimity. But then again, I see things clearly. You, on the other hand, dabble in distortion and moral equivalency. Thank God, I have not been infected with your mind disease.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 9:18 pm josh

            Cunt,your 15 minutes of fame is just about up. CHOOSE!! Tits or its off to Jezebel for ya!


        • on December 13, 2012 at 5:03 pm Greg Eliot

          Glad you brought up Mystic River… talk about a movie leaving a bad taste… I’m still scratching my head over what the heck Eastwood was thinking.


          • on December 16, 2012 at 10:39 pm Canadian Friend

            I could be completely wrong but after I watched Mystic River I had my own ” theory”,

            the movie is a sort of metaphore on the USA being wrong on who they punished after the events of 9/11


      • on December 14, 2012 at 6:03 pm Canadian Friend

        I hate Sean Penn, he is wrong about too many things to mention


        • on December 14, 2012 at 9:43 pm josh

          Ironically he had one of the best lines in modern movies in Fast Times. It was edited out of a TV version I saw a few years ago;I wonder if the line,so not PC,has been completely wiped away? You know the line I mean,lol!!


      • on December 14, 2012 at 9:36 pm josh

        yes he was a young movie star with an Irish face so handsome he couldve banged Aphrodite herself,had she deigned to visit Earth. He gave it all up to try and be a boxer,and got his mug ruined. me? I wouldve maybe banged some more young starlets,did a bit more coke,banged some more young starlets,more coke,even younger starlets,more coke,and THEN did the boxing…


        • on December 15, 2012 at 11:05 am Matthew King (King A)

          Great actor who made the worst possible choices. Angel Heart is a favorite. Color noir at its best.


          • on December 16, 2012 at 3:24 pm josh

            When Lisa Bonet was hot. Now? Scarey!! Interesting that the idiotic fraud that was the Cosby Show sort of inspired hope of races living together.Nice black negro people,working hard and being productive and honest and not mad at whitey.Black chicks who inspired lust;maybe theyre not so bad after all. On the last day of the series,the LA riots broke out…


  26. on December 13, 2012 at 6:52 pm youareallwankers

    I don`t know why white western men are such pussies….
    If the the wogs , SWPL etc starting cultural war against you using PC , play the same on them.

    Every time they mocking white men accuse them of antiwhite racism , or hate speech against white people
    every time you see or hear about movies like Django or whatever boycott them or protest , accuse them of hate speech or anything you can

    every time you see white men in commercials or sitcoms pictured as morons , send petitions to TV stations , newspapers etc

    Do you have balls to defend your race ?

    BTW- One of legendary PUAs – David X is a JEW..


  27. on December 13, 2012 at 8:10 pm Anonymous

    Prepare to puke.

    Who says libertardians are useless? I think they’d be wonderful for stocking game preserves.


  28. on December 13, 2012 at 9:01 pm ariseandexcel

    Hey racists, thanks for ruining a good thing by swarming the buffet when you shouldn’t have been invited to dinner in the first place. I don’t know why this blog went from ‘poolside at the apocalypse’ to Klan meeting, but your unrelated bloviating about race is both highly unwarranted and entirely damaging to men’s causes.

    Dangerandplay had it right – from sentence ONE on this racial shit, nobody here has explained how all this race-baiting and boogeyman talk can help me A) score with women B) get me paid C) improve my life. All I see here are a bunch of alleged victims. ALLEGED.

    Law 10 of 48, bitches – avoid the unhappy and unlucky. If black people or Mexicans or Asians or Jews or white people or Eskimos or hobbits or whatever are ruining your lives so much, well, sorry about your bad circumstances I guess. But I don’t need your infection. You people are infected, and you’re poisoning the game. Something’s wrong with you, because they’re not ruining MY life.

    Do better. All of you.


    • on December 13, 2012 at 10:10 pm Greg Eliot

      So tell me… bruthuh… was it thwack’s race-baiting that upset you… or just whitey giving your ilk the what-for at the chateau?

      You boys are all the same when you come here to cry “RAYCISS!!!!” It’s only the alleged white variety that gets your goat… and why?

      Because… (wait for it):

      Negroes gonna neg.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 2:53 am Jason

        You’re out of your mind. The man was just complaining that race-talk is off topic.

        Obsess much?


        • on December 14, 2012 at 2:59 am Greg Eliot

          Asshole… if this New Logo Of The West post of hearty’s isn’t grist for the race-talk mill, then nothing is on topic.

          And gainsaying the fools who come here with the same old complaints, after said complaints have been parried as unjustified over and over again, is not obsessiveness on the part of the gainsayers.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 3:42 am Nicole

        Apparently you haven’t been paying attention, and definitely haven’t read the archives. Discussion of ethnicity has been done here for quite some time, and all get the same treatment by the regulars.

        Some of us have already gotten to the point of agreeing to disagree, and some of us still debate from time to time, but generally, we try to be somewhat respectful of one another. It’s not about political correctness. It’s about embracing the reality that the world doesn’t dance to any of our wishful thinking, and this is a blog about game.

        People who are against game, like yourself, are going to catch hell from people who are pro game. People who believe in caging men’s genitals by ethnicity are just a more redneck flavored version of feminists who don’t want men to seek foreign spouses when there aren’t enough suitable western women around, or simply because that person they fell in love with happened to be foreign.

        This being part of the internet, and therefore global, many of us are also of mixed ancestry, and rather resent being called names because of it. So when you’re not being respectful of the blog or the people in it, you can’t very well whine about it credibly when they are not respectful of you.

        Suck it up.


        • on December 14, 2012 at 8:22 am Matthew King (King A)

          I’m not of mixed ancestry.

          feelsgoodman


          • on December 14, 2012 at 9:09 am Nicole

            That explains a lot.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 9:29 pm josh

              Haw haw haw!! Give credit…


            • on December 14, 2012 at 9:44 pm josh

              I assume you were going for an inbreeding joke.


            • on December 15, 2012 at 1:56 pm Nicole

              Josh, I was going more for head-in-a-bubble, but that’ll work too.

              People who have a fairly stable ethnic/cultural line tend to view the world through that lense. It has been good for them to be in their little bubble, so they think this should suit everyone else too. They’re often the type who are genetically predisposed to be oversensitive to different looks, and are naturally turned off by variety. It is understandable considering their circumstances.

              I met a guy with this kind of background, and even though he hated his family’s mentality, he still ended up with a woman who was, like him, kind of short with fine blonde hair and blue eyes. They look like a family of gnomes. I think it’s cute.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 11:09 am thwack

            Mathew King
            I’m not of mixed ancestry.
            ————————————
            not Mixed with what?

            Pre-Adamites?

            Goat?

            wheat germ?

            What country you from?

            what!


            • on December 15, 2012 at 11:56 am Matthew King (King A)

              Ha. The Harry-Potter Muggle mentality has degenerated into incredulity: what can he even mean? isn’t everybody mixed? I DON’T GET IT.

              I am American but was not subjected to the American melting pot, which created mutts of everyone forty years off the boat. My ancestry comes from a single people/culture/Volk going back at least a millennium. Is that so hard for you third-generation, 3/16ths-of-this-and-1/32nds-of-that mud-bloods to fathom possible?

              Matt


            • on December 16, 2012 at 12:55 am Nicole

              Matt, it’s hard for others to fathom because most people are born a little sensitive to difference, but because the people around them in early childhood are going to be different whether they like it or not, they get used to it the same way they get used to potty training. By the time they reach puberty, there is also the natural male impulse to seek a variety of lands on which to sow their wild oats, and when men were not being hobbled, this led to lots of mixing and according to some legends, the birth of new nations.

              I personally don’t have issues with people sticking to their own so long as it’s not based on illusions and stupidity. I do think it should be flexible enough that legal specifics are given less priority than individual traits though. Mating and matching is a first come, first serve situation since people are mortal, and both men and women have a biological clock. Men lose potency and/or their sperm degrades, and women lose fertility, so people shouldn’t waste time getting to it. So it is important to find a mate in a timely fashion.

              From personal experience, I have learned that when you have limited tastes, you’ll have limited options, and have to deal with the personality issues inherent to the people in one’s range, and should probably not whine too much about that fact. I couldn’t bring myself to breed with someone who wasn’t a well functioning independent thinker, and am as repulsed by the idea of sheep shagging as you are with the idea of ethnic mixing.

              So I’m feeling you, just understand that people like you are as much freaks as people like me. We like a certain set of traits that are selected for on some levels but selected against on others. Of course we have good arguments for why our choices are better, but really who are they better for?


      • on December 14, 2012 at 4:45 am ariseandexcel

        Whitey isn’t giving my ilk the what-for at the Chateau because I am white. I like being white too – I like the culture, the music, the literature. Just about everything about it, really. I strongly identify with my European roots, and I’m not apologetic for it, nor should I be.

        And furthermore, I don’t mind honest, serious, useful discussions about race. It’s unfortunately a topic to be talked about even now, and it probably won’t ever go away. As an example, I think it’s useful to discuss the differences of how online game works for white and black men; obviously there’s quite a divide in presentation, responses, and the like. Race can be just as relevant a topic in the arena of masculinity and self-improvement as any other topic and I’m not afraid to discuss it.

        People like you embarrass me though. You aren’t making useful observations, you’re slinging racial epithets. You aren’t bringing enlightened discourse, you’re devolving into the same tribal savagery youwould accuse your purported ‘lessers’ of. And furthermore – and this is where it affects ME – you embarrass the cause of men and the curbing of rampant feminism by conflating the very legitimate cause of self-improvement for men with your victimization mentality and race-baiting.

        If you wanted to help men, if you wanted men to improve themselves and the society around them, you and your ilk would evaporate and we’d never have these conversations again. This blog had a lot of good advice that helped me a lot over the last year or two, and now I can’t even pass this URL on to other men who need it because the comments on every other thread are turning into a goddamned Stormfront convention. Want to ensure a guy never makes it out of betaville and never figures out how to properly navigate a world based around fulfilling the feminine imperative? Make sure he thinks that the alternative – positive masculinity – is actually the domain of lowlife skinheads. Just what I need to explain to the blue pill crowd.

        I don’t want my horizon silhouetted with the ghostly outline of your alleged crucifixion. If you people are hellbent on hanging yourself off of crosses on this race topic, then maybe this place isn’t for me. I’m looking for ways to improve myself and change my own world for the better. You’re not.


        • on December 14, 2012 at 10:53 am Greg Eliot

          If you’re white, you’re just another useful idiot then… your post above sounded like the railing of the current South Park generation of negroes and whiggers, so I admit I jumped to a conclusion about your background… now that I know you’re white, I’m doubly-disgusted… because like the other fools here that play your game, you accuse me of race-baiting and give the antiwhites to whose race-baiting I’m responding a pass.

          People like you embarrass me though. You aren’t making useful observations, you’re slinging racial epithets. You aren’t bringing enlightened discourse, you’re devolving into the same tribal savagery youwould accuse your purported ‘lessers’ of. And furthermore – and this is where it affects ME – you embarrass the cause of men and the curbing of rampant feminism by conflating the very legitimate cause of self-improvement for men with your victimization mentality and race-baiting.

          You embarrass yourself… first, by accusing me of using racial epithets (what, is “negro” an epithet, you ass?), and then reverting to your whigger ghetto-ese of calling men ‘bitches’.

          Avaunt, you insupportable twerp… the chateau is already polluted by too many of you SWPL whiggers.


          • on December 14, 2012 at 1:29 pm Jason

            EPIC takedown of your Stormfront mentality, Greg Eliot.

            “you’re devolving into the same tribal savagery you would accuse your purported ‘lessers’ of…”

            Exactly. Tribalism is primitive. We can do better than that. In fact, better people ARE better than that … and you, Greg Eliot, despite your diction, jests, and generally cultured outlook, are definitely not one of those better people.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 1:46 pm Greg Eliot

              Heh, heh… yeah, that’s it… when whites band together, it’s no different than downtown Mogadishu.

              EPIC fail on your latest neener- neener… you, for whom failure here at the chateau is already legendary.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 1:52 pm Greg Eliot

              …and you, Greg Eliot, despite your diction, jests, and generally cultured outlook…

              Ah, nothing like begrudging praise in the morning… smells like… victory.

              And here not too long ago, it seemed like we WNs were just a bunch of illiterate backwater hillbillies. :-D


            • on December 14, 2012 at 3:15 pm NiteLily

              “and you, Greg Eliot, despite your diction, jests, and generally cultured outlook, are definitely not one of those better people.”

              Exactly! LOL! I said this exact thing to someone else who asked me how can I be so anti-Eliot when he uses puns and he likes show tunes, as if that makes a person good or decent. And regarding being cultured, the German people were the most cultured people on earth at the time of WWII, and yet they perpetrated the most unimaginable cruelty and suffering on others. That’s the lesson of the holocaust, which is why I am so opposed to racism and ant-Semitism – it turns the most educated, enlightened, cultured people into monsters, and being educated and cultured doesn’t mean one is good or decent. Decency has nothing to do with education, class, race. It has to do with family upbringing and being taught the good old-fashioned values of goodness and compassion (Christian charity), and when I encounter a man who says he is religious and quotes God’s words on regular basis hugging Nazi beliefs and rhetoric, or who elevates evil people like Hitler and Wagner, it disgusts me to no end and I feel he has dishonored God’s name. The man should be ashamed of himself.

              Greg Eliot has a Nazi fetish, without a doubt, and he often laments the fact that Hitler lost the war, to which I like to retort that if God had wanted Hitler to win, he would have won. I like to drive it home to him, and make the realization as painful as possible for him. For those of us who believe in God, that’s proof positive a man like Hitler will never ever be able to destroy civilization or humanity. God will never allow a madman to destroy his handiwork. Greg Eliot, you need to revisit the ways of God, because you sure don’t understand him.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 5:20 pm Jason

              Yeah, he’s got a bigtime Nazi fetish … but he’s old enough to know not to reveal it explicitly.

              But he’s dropped a million clues. And I’m really good at filling in the blanks.


            • on December 14, 2012 at 6:40 pm NiteLily

              “And I’m really good at filling in the blanks.”

              I’ve noticed you are getting really good at reading between the lines and filing in the blanks. :)


            • on December 14, 2012 at 8:44 pm Greg Eliot

              Both of you clowns, in your imagined world of NAHZEES under every bed, at least admit it takes projection on your part to “read between lines” and “fill in blanks” about what you imagine to be the intentions and “fetishes” of others.

              I’ll leave it to other readers to speculate (and probably with infinitely more accuracy) about who does and doesn’t have the NAHZEE fetish… based upon the voluminous keystrokes spent bringing up the name of Hitler and the Third Reich.

              But more importantly, who does and doesn’t speak their minds and intentions here at the chateau explicitly.


        • on December 14, 2012 at 3:05 pm NiteLily

          “People like you embarrass me though. You aren’t making useful observations, you’re slinging racial epithets. You aren’t bringing enlightened discourse, you’re devolving into the same tribal savagery youwould accuse your purported ‘lessers’ of. And furthermore – and this is where it affects ME – you embarrass the cause of men and the curbing of rampant feminism by conflating the very legitimate cause of self-improvement for men with your victimization mentality and race-baiting.”

          BINGO!!!!! Couldn’t have said it better myself. He doesn’t add anything to the thread by way of useful observations about race, religion, sex, men, or women. All he does is spew RECYCLED thoughts and slurs against whomever isn’t white. The man is a major hypocrite, and too bad he can’t recognize it in himself. He accuses Thwack of being jealous of whites for their civilizational achievements, yet he constantly complains against Jews for controlling the media, Hollywood, finance, and what have you. I immediately recognized he was jealous of whom he perceives to be better than himself. It’s symptomatic of most bigoted people, and I like to use Hitler and Wagner, his two heroes in anti-Semitism as examples. LOL! Of course, it pisses him off. Of course, because I am right about him. I shined the light on him, that’s for sure. And look how he responds to you – in the most incoherent way.

          “And furthermore, I don’t mind honest, serious, useful discussions about race. “

          He says people like you help anti-whites spew their race-baiting, when he is the only one race-baiting here. Other whites criticize other races, but only he makes it so personal, it’s beyond disgusting. Like I said, he can’t see his own hypocrisy. None of us mind discussing race, but for Eliot it’s the only reason he is here.


          • on December 15, 2012 at 12:23 pm Matthew King (King A)

            Sweetheart, one commenter on one relatively obscure website won’t tip the scales to totalitarianism. Breathe easy and match wit for wit. It’s the coin of this particular realm. More poetry, less prose. I know you have it in you. Be a happy warrior. “We are jolly green giants walking the earth. With guns.”

            Matt


            • on December 15, 2012 at 7:21 pm NiteLily

              My darlin’, I know you’re fixed, but you’ll soon understand all.


    • on December 13, 2012 at 10:49 pm sfer

      I agree. This is just stupid. Who the fuck cares when nazis or slave owners get shot. Not me.

      [Heartiste: This is exactly what the Cathedral propagandists want you to say to its enemies.]


      • on December 14, 2012 at 2:56 pm thwack

        First they came to shoot the nazis, but I didn’t care cause I was not a nazi.

        then they came to shoot the slave owners, but I didn’t care cause I was not a slave owner.

        Then they…


        • on December 16, 2012 at 9:57 pm Greg Eliot

          Ah, there’s a fellow for you! Thwack’s always good for a gem in due season, and this diamond-in-the-rough is GBFM-worthy.

          Well-played, sir… well-played, indeed.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 6:23 pm askjoe

        It’s already here, in a way. The SWPL crowd mocks whites now who bitch about affirmative action or whatever, including black on white crimes.We deserve it, don’t you know.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 9:49 pm josh

        Blacks owned slaves,as (surely!!!!!!!!!!) did the jews. What about a black going all gangsta on a bunch of jews? Would that pic get made? Or a white abolitionist taking out all the black slave owners?


    • on December 14, 2012 at 3:21 am Anonymous

      But, is it beta?


      • on December 14, 2012 at 4:50 am ariseandexcel

        +1


    • on December 14, 2012 at 8:10 am Matthew King (King A)

      Law 10 of 48, bitches…

      Robert Greene? You expose yourself. His insipid compilation is the McDonald’s Dollar Menu for those who have never heard of classical gourmet. “Bitches”?

      Dangerandplay had it right…

      Dangerandplayandcoolstuff is a thin-skinned wannabe who spouts “dangerous” opinions about topics he knows nothing about. If your entire bucket list is “A) score with women B) get me paid C) improve my life,” then skip the posts on broader topics like Western Civ. Some of us can walk and chew gum without erupting in Frustrationandresentment. Nobody said you had to choose the red meat from the “buffet,” vagetarian. You don’t even have to go near it.

      Men don’t have “men’s causes.” They deliberate and act according to their individual interests. If some observers claim a foresight that perceives the connection between my interests/concerns/assets and some unpalatable/verboten subjects, I want their case to be freely heard without running it through Ariseandexcelandachieveandconquerandkickass’s PC filter. αἰὲν ἀριστεύειν, bruh.

      You want this “poolside at the apocalypse” milieu to be all poolside and no apocalypse. You claim that we eclectic thinkers are losers for casting a wide net, but you behave like a woman with the vapors who wants to limit all conversation to the topics your frail constitution can tolerate.

      I respect the directness of your attempt to shame us into retreat — it’s better than the usual whining to the administrator to intercede. But you are too much heat and not enough light, eager puppy. If you want to truly neutralize a topic, you must first involve yourself in that topic and demonstrate you’re worth listening to on that topic, rather than venting your spleen, which suspiciously registers like political correctness.

      Matt


      • on December 15, 2012 at 5:07 am ariseandexcel

        I hardly consider Greg Idiot’s drivel, or most of the trash that Team WN are attempting to defend, as Western Civ. You’re trying real hard to put a sparkle on that turd, but it’s not coming off.

        You don’t have an answer for anything. You’re still dodging every single objection. You can’t explain how WN benefits me -as a white man-, you can’t explain how WN benefits men in general, you can’t explain how it benefits the discourse here. You have no other justification for this talk other than to pretend that it’s edgy and daring and exists on a higher level of consciousness than the PC police are comfortable dealing with, and therein lies the truth. But it’s not. It’s the same noise any sub-80 IQ redneck can come up with.

        I do think reactive, anti-white racism exists on an institutional level, just as anti-male bias exists. It needs to be dealt with – intelligently, rationally and with a civic mindedness. But that cause won’t get advanced by you idiots tossing racial slurs back and forth here and blaming Jews and blacks. You can hear that noise from drunks at an Alabama dive bar. That’s what’s going on here, and it stinks.

        It literally baffles me how you people think you’re going to make some kind of positive change in the world by reaching down into the same gutter you think all the brown people are; as you smear yourselves with the slime with one hand, you also spread filth on the good topics being discussed here on the other. None come out the better for it.


        • on December 15, 2012 at 12:16 pm Matthew King (King A)

          We’re not talking about “Greg Idiot’s drivel.” We’re talking about the host’s (“The New Logo of the West”). And if you paid more attention to the people not cowed into hating their own race per se, you’d recognize the substantial qualitative difference between our commentary and “the same noise any sub-80 IQ redneck can come up with.”

          See, you never get that far. You viscerally react whenever you see certain words or topics on the screen. This is the essence of the SWPL ethos we are publicly formulating a response to, which, like legislation, is similar to making sausage: bloody, grinding, and unpretty.

          You expose yourself as, at bottom, a cringing pansy because you can only imagine one malign reason for us to talk about race. Meantime, everything in the culture is about race, but people like you attempt to shame-enforce one segment from “speaking frankly” back.

          Well, your claims about manliness notwithstanding, this is what men do. When we are presented with a stink-tank of perfumed, pretty lies suffocating the culture, we air it out. We don’t hold our breath. Men don’t go along to get along, especially when their enemies are openly plotting for their diminution.

          Their project is patient and far more insidious than you believe polite to imagine: they do not confront us directly, like men, but like feminists they sabotage and corrupt the minds of generations. And they have apparently done it so well in your case that you demonstrate no ability to recognize your incapacity for independent thought on this matter.

          For someone posting Augustus as an avatar and claiming a classical motto for your name, you need to become more aware of their ethos and less a parrot of the shifting mores of your time. I’d suggest you read the Romans you nominally represent: they struck the perfect balance of recognizing the superiority of their culture as they systematically brought inferiors within its aegis.

          Matt


          • on December 16, 2012 at 1:05 am Nicole

            The reason it’s noise and drivel, Matt, is not because of racism. Other guys here don’t have any particular love of people of color, but are tolerated because this hasn’t translated to a promotion of bondage. They are simply exercising their freedom of choice, not seeking to limit anyone else’s choices.

            Greg and yourself to some degree, consistently degrade those who choose to opt out of getting treated like crap and taken for granted.


          • on December 16, 2012 at 8:15 am thwack

            For someone posting Augustus as an avatar and claiming a classical motto for your name, you need to become more aware of their ethos and less a parrot of the shifting mores of your time. I’d suggest you read the Romans you nominally represent: they struck the perfect balance of recognizing the superiority of their culture as they systematically brought inferiors within its aegis.

            Matt
            —————————————

            You mean like this?


            • on December 16, 2012 at 12:57 pm Greg Eliot

              Thwack, you’re a cantaloupe!

              Augustus would say “Passeas me cum hoc feces!(miss me with that shit! :-D ).” and shake his head.

              For the Moops’ (yes, the card says ‘Moops’) adventures in Sicily date about three to four centuries (if memory serves) AFTER the fall of Rome, the latter occuring in the late 5th century.

              And I’m not even sure they made it to Rome herself, not that it really mattered by then, since by the 9th century AD, the erstwhile Eternal City was little more than a malarial pesthole. I’ll let others look up the details on that account.


          • on December 16, 2012 at 4:19 pm ariseandexcel

            We’re not talking about “Greg Idiot’s drivel.” We’re talking about the host’s (“The New Logo of the West”). And if you paid more attention to the people not cowed into hating their own race per se, you’d recognize the substantial qualitative difference between our commentary and “the same noise any sub-80 IQ redneck can come up with.”
            –
            You mean like Josh down there?

            Keep bringing quality heat, geniuses.


        • on December 16, 2012 at 3:32 pm josh

          Nigger,stop all this bullshitting. Pack your shit,move to Haiti and live amongst your own.Have fun telling THEM your nigger-horseshit. But…you’re not gonna do that,lol.


    • on December 14, 2012 at 10:27 am Dan Fletcher

      So brave parroting the PC beliefs you’ve had shoved down your throat.

      I’m a lover of truth. If the truth steers me down avenues offensive to your feint heart then so be it. Until you can offer a shred of evidence against the real genetic difference that exist between human populations you are merely a child throwing a tantrum because of your discomfort with the subject matter.

      You argue against the 2d character of the “big bad raaycist”. Instinctively rattling of the per-approved talking points like a trained bird. You ask “What’s the benefit to me?” as though selfishness is some groundbreaking philosophy rather than the base state of an animal.


      • on December 16, 2012 at 1:02 am Nicole

        Something being offensive doesn’t make it true. As I’ve said before, the most aggressive sheep is still not a wolf.

        Someone who is against male freedom and is anti game has no place here, and is not an agent of truth.


        • on December 16, 2012 at 1:31 pm Dan Fletcher

          “Something being offensive doesn’t make it true.”

          Show me where I said that.

          “Someone who is against male freedom and is anti game has no place here, and is not an agent of truth.”

          Show me where I said that.


  29. on December 13, 2012 at 9:49 pm youareallwankers

    ariseandsuckmycock – fuck you, idiot


    • on December 14, 2012 at 1:32 pm Jason

      Is that the best you’ve got?


  30. on December 14, 2012 at 1:59 am aspic

    And to think that a generation ago we had people like Kubrick making films…


  31. on December 14, 2012 at 8:57 am thwack

    I suggest everyone step back and take some time to produce a FUNCTIONAL definition of racism that clearly and precisely demonstrates how and why it is harmful enough to you in order to justify opposition and/or counter action on your part.

    The term racism gets thrown around entirely too much these days and I fear black people increasingly use it as a crutch to compensate for lack of discipline, dedication, focus and study of the science of problem solving.

    In other words, blaming racism keeps black people in a child like state, unaccountable for our choices and actions, much like women and girls.

    Who benefits from that?

    Every black person needs to ask him or her self; “what is the purpose of a black person?”

    Until you can answer that question truthfully and honestly your attempts at improvement will always elude you.


    • on December 14, 2012 at 9:47 am Nicole

      Every individual should ask themselves why they should continue breathing, but fat chance of that ever happening.

      When one has seen enough of the world, one comes to understand that we’re all just human and that’s that. Nobody is better or worse than anybody else just because of ethnicity. Some cultures are better than others and produce more fit individuals. “White” culture, whatever that is, is not one of those better ones. It’s a mishmash of Anglo arrogance and corporate sheeple herding.

      In European cultures where there are few if any other people around, folks still get messed up by one thing or another, when they’re poor or in despair. Being pale doesn’t seem to keep them from killing each other or themselves.

      Some idiots here just live in a dream world where they close their eyes to whatever they don’t want to see. I don’t have a problem with it so long as the only ones they’re harming are themselves. It’s just annoying when they bring that here, but annoying is all it is. At the end of the day, some White kid in Siberia is shooting “krokodil” and another in an African slum is sniffing glue. What some folks need is more gratitude that it’s not them or their kid, and less finger pointing to blame someone who has nothing to do with their situation, for their not having more of all they need to survive.


      • on December 14, 2012 at 3:03 pm thwack

        Nicole
        Every individual should ask themselves why they should continue breathing, but fat chance of that ever happening.
        —————————————————-

        Ive done it. And the answer is : “in order to demonstrate the best breathing technique for the benefit of people who have trouble breathing”

        (now get around that)


        • on December 16, 2012 at 1:37 am Nicole

          Well, as is said by some folks in Chinese martial arts, the man who masters one technique is more dangerous than the one who has merely studied many. Breathing is probably the most important.

          You know what I meant though. If someone isn’t doing anything good for their world, that they happened to be born a particular color is not enough to say they have more right to be here than someone who is doing something good for their world.

          Some of these idiots can’t even say, “I may not actually do much, but I need to be here because ____ loves me and they would miss me if I were gone.”


        • on December 17, 2012 at 11:04 am Canadian Friend

          When your own government tells you that because you are white you should get out of the way and let colored people breath in all the air.

          Now that is where the fuck we have a problem


          • on December 17, 2012 at 1:46 pm Nicole

            No, you had a problem when you first fell for the idea that you were entitled to the air in the Americas. You marched like good ideological slaves from coast to coast, and fought and died for this presumed right, blissfully unaware that you were just doing the grunt work for people who would take all that you gained.


  32. on December 14, 2012 at 5:24 pm youareallwankers

    thwack exposed :

    - you are not black , you are SWPL living in safe neighborhood pretending to be black

    or

    - you are black african adopted by leftist celebrity when you were a baby


    • on December 14, 2012 at 9:18 pm thwack

      OK thats 2; what is your 3rd wish?


      • on December 14, 2012 at 9:52 pm josh

        You’re hit by a bus?


  33. on December 14, 2012 at 10:16 pm Vicious

    So how many guys here has actually seen the movie?


    • on December 15, 2012 at 2:58 am John

      The message of Basterds could arguably be, “this is what happens when you don’t finish the job”. If his portrayal of the slaveowners was anywhere near so sympathetic as that of the Germans, you could takeaway, “this is what happens when you don’t control your farm implements.


      • on December 15, 2012 at 3:08 am John

        One gets a clue from the title, which, like “Inglorious Basterds”, is none too complimentary to the ostensible protagonist.


  34. on December 16, 2012 at 2:32 pm Rick Derris

    wow … hypocrisy really is the tribute that vice pays to virtue:

    http://nation.foxnews.com/jamie-foxx/2012/12/16/jamie-foxx-hollywood-deserves-some-blame-violence


    • on December 16, 2012 at 3:20 pm Greg Eliot

      Heh, heh… Thus Spake Jamie “Every-Single-Thing-In-My-Life-Is-Built-Around-Race” Foxx.


    • on December 17, 2012 at 4:55 pm Canadian Friend

      When one mentions Hollywood we all think “white people” and the shooter at that school was white

      Jamie Fox would have never said anything that puts blame on black people

      Hell! black on white crime is super high and NOT one black celebrity ever says a word about it

      Comments like that are always directed at white people


  35. on December 20, 2012 at 11:45 am goth

    terantino is most likely of jewish blood



Comments are closed.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    • RT @raysawhill: Con Artist Du Jour. bit.ly/14etMT4 7 hours ago
    • Hugs Shyster, still feeling guilty about screwing a bunch of much younger coeds. theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/… 14 hours ago
    • RT @Mangan150: More Foreclosures and Suicides than During the Great Depression | Zero Hedge zerohedge.com/contributed/20… 17 hours ago
    • "Then, I agreed and said that her handwriting was “incredibly sloppy” (uncaring assholery)" tinyurl.com/acad5kp 17 hours ago
    • @jrseaward @Arronski Men would bang a Bar Rafaeli terrorist, but they wouldn't try to rationalize her evil. File under: men, women=unalike! 17 hours ago
    • This is an excellent comment on hypergamy over at Marginal Chalupas (CRL-F "ladderff"): marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolu… 18 hours ago
  • Recent Comments

    el sid on Bearing Witness To The Self-De…
    el sid on Bearing Witness To The Self-De…
    el sid on Bearing Witness To The Self-De…
    el sid on Bearing Witness To The Self-De…
    Avenroad on Body Men Vs Face Men
    Nicole on Body Men Vs Face Men
    gaoxiaen on Body Men Vs Face Men
    gaoxiaen on Body Men Vs Face Men
    Rum on Body Men Vs Face Men
    personal shit, week… on Have Guitar, Will Tingle
  • Top Posts

    • A Subtle Shift Away From Rightist Pusillanimity?
    • Should You Stay Or Should You Go?
    • Body Men Vs Face Men
    • Bearing Witness To The Self-Destruction Of The Western Woman
    • Confident A-Hole Game
    • When The Body And Face Don't Match
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • Hovering
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • The G Manifesto
    • The Rookie
    • Treatise of Love
    • VKs empire of dirt
  • The Dark Enlightenment

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Education Realist
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Information Processing
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • Mangans Miscellany
    • OneSTDV
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • The Harem and Mongol Hordes

    • Alias Clio
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • Gucci Little Piggy
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Hyperbole and a Half
    • In Mala Fide
    • Jack Goes Forth
    • Overcoming Bias
    • The Fourth Checkraise
    • The Rawness
    • Udolpho
  • The Jesters

    • People of Walmart
    • PostSecret
    • Stuff White People Like
    • The Daily Sarge
    • Things My Boyfriend Says
    • xkcd

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,373 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: