The thing with kids is not about reproduction in a gene-bank. It is about knowing your kids from day #1 and *** SPENDING TIME WITH THEM *** so they get the chance to learn from your wisdom.

They wont be a younger form of “you”, ever. But the children you raise will enheritage something from your inner self, from whe way you live your life. Your values and believes.

That my friend is what I call an alpha legacy.

If you do not have physical children you did miss something. However you created this blog and over 500 comments on this topic alone are prove, that you indeed already DO have a legacy.

Just curious, I’ve seen you mention that you are able to easily befriend most people in clubs by being real and not trying to compete with material things, is doing that any different from this? For example, a rich VIP guy with a mansion and six cars, how exactly would you “bring value” and get in that social circle?

I find your post really interesting. I read something like that, except it was the opposite. I read that (from a reputable site; sorry cant remember the name), that alphas tend to have sons, while betas tend to have daughters. This is as a beta probably cant set his son up to succeed in a hypergamy market, and therefore having a female would give the lineage a higher chance at continuing, as it easier for the average girl to get laid than the average man.

Alphas would tend to have sons, as we all know how the pareto principle applies in hypergamy, and therefore, an alphas son could have access to many women, as opposed to a beta, who has to settle for a girl who fucked the entire wrestling team at age 15.

I believe I came across while reading about some Algerian prince who fathered 600 children or so, many of them men, with the ‘serf’ equivalents mostly producing daughters.

And honestly, I feel that my experiences hold that theory true, as I often see many poorer men with multiple children producing daughters abundently, while more ‘alpha’ men with better careers, etc. producing sons, as the hypergamy and harems were built for the.

I apologize if I am repeating what Jack Amock already posted, just trying to humbly add perspective on it.

On the matter of Spec Ops producing more sons than daughters than kids, IDK if that rings true, as I know that these guys tend to produce after many years in their deadly, yet extremely noble craft. Therefore the rate of death rises, and unfortunately these valient soldiers don’t make enough to leave their children much behind. Therefore it would make genetic sense that they leave daughters. I read a lot on this things, and right now and training my arse of to serve as a SEAL. Also I read alot of great blogs authored by these awesome men, and thought I would share, as I feel you may appreciate them.

http://sofrep.com/ (blog written by an started by former SEAL Brandon Webb, author of book)

http://www.socnet.com/ (forums for all SOCOM forces, with Mods and contributors of retired SOCOM)

http://www.professionalsoldiers.com/ ( same, but focused on Army Special Forces/’Green Berets’)

http://www.armyranger.com/bb/ (self expl.)

http://www.navyseals.com/forums/ (self expl,)

anyway, sorry if my post was really long, just trying to add to this thought discussion,

Thanks for listening.

Let God deal with them, not us. It’s his job to be the judge, the jury, the executioner.

The relativism at the heart of your faith makes you a dopey, unreliable conservative and cryptolibertardian.