Teach Your Sons Well…

Spotted In The Fun House Mirror Wild

A large, muscular black man in a dress and bright pink lipstick asked a middle-aged White lady to hold a door open for him. Onlookers who numbered about fifteen or twenty gawked for a split second, then promptly switched to feigning impassive nonchalance.

The side show freak quality of this vignette was most pronounced in the reaction of the self-policing crowd. The Emperor has clothes…it’s a dress hiding a sausage, worn by a creature barking at the plebs in a lispy growl through neon natgeo lips…and we’re all supposed to act as if this is the most normal and natural thing in the world.

Is it humiliation if it’s self-induced?

Freelance Comment Of The Week: The Real Censorship

From Garth Volbeck,

Folks are keen to decry “Nazi-style” censorship but have little to say about “Jewish-style” censorship, like throwing elderly women in prison for disputing historical narratives, or threatening neutral venues over conferences with speakers they want to silence, or pressuring bosses to fire employees for political opinions, or colluding to deny banking and money transfer services—

A good rule of thumb is to remember that everything (((shitlibs))) accuse others of doing they themselves are guilty of doing. Psychological projection is the blast radius of the shitlib id.

America Is A Race

Laura Ingraham couldn’t stand the Lies anymore and let slip a heady dose of Truth:

Fox News host Laura Ingraham gave a monologue Wednesday night about “massive demographic changes” in the U.S. due to immigration–and the reaction was typical.

“In some parts of the country, it does seem like the America that we know and love doesn’t exist anymore,” Ingraham said in part.

“Massive demographic changes have been foisted on the American people, and they’re changes that none of us ever voted for, and most of us don’t like. From Virginia to California, we see stark examples of how radically in some ways the country has changed,” she added.

This was too much realtalk for the Diversitroid Fuggernaut. They menstruated all over Twatter. One oriental ingrate in particular caught my attention:

Dear Laura Ingraham: I served on active duty to defend your right to make racist statements.

America is not a race or demographic. It's a beautiful & bold idea, based on life, liberty & the pursuit of happiness. You @IngrahamAngle are no more American than I am or others are. https://t.co/Op7rnjak5o

— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) August 9, 2018

Wrong.

I suppose I’ll be the first to tell anti-White bigot ted lieu that America is indeed a race and a demographic. Specifically, the historic America until the recent open borders unpleasantness was Anglo-Germanic. That is core America, which persists to this day. Heritage America. If it weren’t true, then we could import a billion chinese and according to this “America is an idea” logic, America would still be America. Of course, that’s a laughable assertion.

Which is the point. Laughable assertions, or Big Lies, are meant to confuse White Americans about the true and historic nature of their homeland. Sow enough confusion, and (so the anti-Whites hope) White Americans will bloodlessly surrender their land to the hordes.

I’m happy to say that their hopes are dashed. There won’t be surrender. And if it comes to that, history shows us it won’t be bloodless.

Post-Niceness

Niceness pays in nice societies.

Nice societies are an effect of the nice people in them.

Fewer nice people, less nice society, less niceness pays.

As America becomes more Diverse™, expect to see an avalanche of articles explaining that niceness doesn’t pay. Because it won’t. Not any longer. America is filling up with not-nice immigrants who will feast on the shrinking pool of nice Americans like vultures picking at a carcass.

A reader adds,

“nice” just means that you behave in such a way that no one fears the consequences of mistreating you

it is dysfunctional in a world full of sociopaths and people who hate you

Welcome to Post-Niceness, an America that has become like the rabble that used to look longingly toward her from the bleakness of their shithole homelands.

Now they’re here, and they’ve brought the Bleakness with them.

Exhibit A:

Black Refuses To Pay Asians For Pedicure, Asians Call Cops, Race War Ensues

Diversity is our pay-per-view entertainment.

Spotted In The Post-America Wild

A pear-shaped, bland-looking mid-30s White woman with splotchy skin, seated across a small table from a slightly younger black man (presentable, pureblood). It was obviously a first or second date. Her chicken wings and arm flab undulated in the air as she gesticulated during an impassioned speech about how much White people suck, “White privilege”, racist cops, etc etc. She caviled about her race for a few minutes, while blacky muttered “yeah” and grunted every few seconds. Under the table, I noticed he had slipped his paw up her thigh and was making a move toward her mons. She never stopped kvetching.

Blacks don’t give a shit about Whites hating on their own race. White virtue signaling is for the benefit of other Whites, not blacks, but some mudsharks are so oblivious, or so deluded to think otherwise, that they can barely contain themselves when a black is their captured audience. I swear these pre-Wall White frumps gets a bigger tingle from disavowing their own race in front of a black than they do later despoiling their own race in the black’s bed.

These women may as well be an alien species to me. Whatever connection we have through the mists of history is frayed beyond rescue.

I pity mudsharks. And pity is a form of contempt. She’s cursed herself to a lifetime of social ostracism, lineage destruction, and regret that crushes her soul with each year it becomes obvious to her what a big fucking mistake she made.

She is walking metadeath.

A reader asks, “what about white women who adopt black kids?”. In one important way, these White women are even worse. They pollute their families with the full knowledge that their actions will make the lives of their White biological children (if they have them) more miserable. It’s a staggeringly selfish act.

The Sexual Market Gatekeeper Theory Of Political Affiliation

williamk’s signal-to-noise ratio is off the charts. Nearly every comment is COTW-worthy. Here he explains how the sexual market gatekeeper role of women and the marriage market gatekeeper role of men influences the politics of each sex.

An interesting interpretation of the data is that among college eds, White Men are watching the women for signals, that is they are only as conservative as they can be and still get laid. While among non-college eds it more likely the opposite, the women will be only as liberal as they can be and still get married.

In both cohorts, the gatekeepers (sex for college eds, marriage for non college eds) set the political trends. Of course, being a liberal doesn’t actually help you get laid, but this is a good take on the general pulse of what’s happening: When men are in control (marriage), women follow the men. When women are in control (sexual access), men follow the women.

This is a parsimonious theory for the ideological split we see between non-college White women and over-credentialed White women. Female college students are on the cock carousel life strategy (whether they actually ride or not is immaterial — the trajectory of their lives will follow a similar path to that of the sex and the city slut who rides all day and night). For these college girls — and note that college girls are dumber today than they were in the past, owing to the lowered admissions standards of McUniversities  — they are staring down the barrel of a decade’s worth of premarital sex. So their roles as sexual gatekeepers colors their interactions with men and their relationship to the State. College men, aka soyboys, will dance to the girls’ “welcome rapefugees” tune as long as they believe it gets them within the orbit of their nearest sex dispensary.

Non-college women, in contrast, have their eyes more strongly focused on marriage, because they can’t afford to blow a decade on cock hopping and mimosa brunches. They need a provider (a lot of the immiseration of the working class is a consequence of the lack of suitable provider males). Non-college women will therefore reflect the political views of their men to better sell themselves as marriage-worthy prospects.

A confounding factor to willamk’s theory is that ideology is partly heritable. It may be the case that women more interested in marriage and repulsed by the cock carousel lifestyle tend also to be more conservative in outlook. So college is filling up with the opposite — girls who aren’t as singularly focused on getting married and would prefer to monkey swing from soyboy to soyboy until latching onto a supergoy. Nevertheless, this gatekeeper theory of political affiliation is better than most I’ve read.

Executive summary:

Thirsty betas => shitliberalism
Desperate bachelorettes => shitlordism

I swear you’ll read more perceptive social analysis in one day on this blog than you’ll read in ten years at National Rejew.

FYI, williamk is the man who also introduced to this esteemed Chateau the concept of post-America liberalism as a “status cheating” strategy. Namely, as the nation has become more economically unequal, there are fewer avenues for striver SWPLs to gain real world, objective material and social status, so these locked out SWPLs turn to the raving lunacy of shitlibbery to gain unearned status by parroting anti-White pabulum. The solution to our shitlib problem may in part be returning to a more egalitarian (not “equal”) society marked by rising wages and less status whoring. Think anti-trust, tariffs, closed borders. So far, Trump is hitting two of three. I’m confident he’ll get around to the other one once all the GOPe cucks are jettisoned this November.

PS Do married White women continue voting like their husbands after years of marriage? If so, that would indicate a real shift in power dynamics in which married women mature into strongly identifying with their husband’s worldviews. If not, it would indicate there are social pressures pushing women to abdicate their marital duties.