“look at me i am powerful wahman with my fake bushy manbrows”

I figure mentally ill broads like this one paint on these thick fake manbrows to appear more aggrocuntish. You know, “I am woman hear me screech” ego assuaging. But now I wonder if it might be a subconscious expression of latent pathological narcissism.

Narcissists have thicker, denser, more distinct eyebrows, according to a new study

according to a new study, published in the Journal of Personality, you may be able to detect a narcissist by focusing on one particular facial feature — their eyebrows.

Researchers Miranda Giacomin and Nicholas Rule recruited participants to look at the faces of people who were all across the narcissistic spectrum, from a normal level to full blown narcissist — and it turned out they were pretty good at identifying them.

Strangely, when participants were shown pictures of just the eyebrows, they could correctly identify the narcissists too.

They highlighted femininity, grooming, and distinctiveness when they picked out the narcissists, but results showed it was distinctiveness that was key — narcissists tended to have darker, thicker, more distinctive eyebrows.

Eyebrows make our faces more recognisable, and in recent years they have become something of a fashion statement. Narcissists may like to make a statement with their brows so to tantalise potential love interests and make an impression.

As the authors wrote, they might “seek to maintain distinct eyebrows to facilitate others’ ability to notice, recognise, and remember them; thereby increasing their likability and reinforcing their overly positive self-views.”

It could also simply be because eyebrows give away more social messages than we realise. They are important for our facial expressions, but could also reveal subtle, subconscious information too.

I predict what we’ll find out in the coming years as the genetic and biological sciences advance is that physiognomy is real; that there are thousands of these connections between the personality/behavior and the physical appearance which clue us into a person’s character.

The story of the 21st Century will be science vindicating the “discredited” wisdom of the 19th Century.

“The ability to identify dark personality traits at zero-acquaintance provides particular value for avoiding exploitation and manipulation,” the researchers wrote.

Sounds like pattern recognition aka racism & sexism to me. BURN THE HERETIC

ps “at zero-acquaintance” would make a great movie title.

“The increasing incidence of narcissism underscores this value. Fortunately, people can accurately judge others’ narcissism based on how they act, what they say, what they wear, and what their faces look like.”

Sociopathy and narcissism are increasing in America. Our fracturing social contract (thanks, Diversity!) is allowing con men and narcissists to flourish and exploit the growing number of weak links in the system, the declining cooperativeness, and the increasing inanity and infantilism. The War against Noticing is really a War against Not Being Exploited. It’s in the interest of the exploiters to keep the exploited dumb, gullible, and fearful to act in their interest.

Plus, I’m getting tired of women ritualistically uglifying themselves according to the tenets of a vapid man-hating pussyhat ideology.

Oy, There It Is

My assumption was proven safe. At least one of the lead authors of that “Debiasing Desire” anti-White research paper is [a special person]. In this case, what looks to be [a special person of scissoring].

“So you’re saying I have a chosen!”

Now I don’t want to say every single time, but it’s every single time.

Commenter Sean Fielding found a paragraph in the paper that gives the Culture of Critique game away:

How about this tidbit buried in the original 18 page report: “While it may strike us as normatively acceptable to encourage intimate platform users to be open to more diverse potential partners, we might find some categories more palatable for such intervention than others. For example, it might seem inappropriate to suggest that a Jewish user seeking other Jewish people “expand her horizons” past those preferences . . .”


Miscegenation for the goyium, purity for the [special people].

They’re openly telegraphing their anti-White Christian malice, through oily grins. Do we need to get hammered over the head with a shofar to see it?


Case closed. Only Whites should be manipulated through dating apps “algorithms” to embrace diversity.

They are not even trying to be a little bit more subtle anymore. They are going right to the jugular: yes, we hate you, we want to see you extinct, any problem with that?

Greg Eliot,

Unless of course (((they))) WANT to defile shicksas, amirite?

That is some 500 degree temperature worthy chutzpah, right there.

(((shakin’ mah kopf)))

It’s so Mortimer-tier arrogant as to be almost amusing. Almost, if it weren’t also deadly in consequence.

I have a theory about this off-the-charts chutzpah. Sure, partly it’s the consequence of a deep-seated malevolence to subvert orderly Gentile societies which can be more easily economically exploited and kept divided as a safeguard against majority will, but another part is simply that they are surrounded by libgoy enablers, who either encourage their anti-Gentilism because of a shared disdain for Western values, or are too cowardly to oppose and shame anti-Gentilism when it rears up.

If you lived in a shitlib insular bubble that shielded you from criticism and flattered your every unctuous piety, you might never learn when your tribal animus isn’t welcome, or how badly it falls on the ears of those who live outside your bubble. So you’d carry on, oblivious to the justified rage you provoke in your enemies. For a smart people, they sure do some stupid shit.

Red Tsunami?

I present the following for your spirited debate.

Experienced Father says some voter data metrics suggest a possible “red tsunami” for the midterms in a couple weeks. Read on…


You need to check out the twitter feed of —
Larry Schweikart@LarrySchweikart.

Short form — He is tracking early voting returns in states that report total votes by party affiliation and its looking like Red Tsunami. This was one of his recent threads —

1) Last night I said we have 12 data points (AZ statewide, FL statewide +4 specific counties, IA + 2 counties, OH 2 counties, and NC). Every single one was showing GOP turnout higher than midterm levels of 2014 and all but one (a county) showing turnout above 2016.

2) If I recall all the data correctly, D turnout/performance was below that of 2016 and, in the case of IA, below that of 2014. 3) Now we have two more data points to add: news out of WY that a net of 10k switched from D/other to R in last six months & turnout #s in Knox Co. TN

3) Out of 12 MEASURABLE data points–not polls which are opinions of what people “might” do in the future—every single one is favors the Rs. 4) I’ll admit, I got a tad depressed for a minute yesterday when the latest Siena/NYT polls came out . . . before I was reminded . . .

4) . . they were making 60,000 calls to reach a mere 300 respondents. SIXTY THOUSAND! 5) Who do you think is NOT responding? Conservatives, Republicans, people with families & jobs. 6) That means these NYT polls are utterly worthless with a margin of error of 20% or more

The thing that stood out for me in that passage was it now takes -200- calls to get one ‘valid’ poll result, with a 20% “error bar” because…(my speculation) unscreenable lying to the poll taker.

All media polls are is nothing but propaganda to manipulate voter turn out.

I don’t know if these tantalizing early returns are predictive, but historically midterm elections have rarely gone well for the sitting president’s party. The American people have a subconscious need to “balance” the power bases in Washington.

However, we’re currently in a very ahistorical time. The nation is less White than it’s been since the height of the slave trade (and that was when Whites were cultural hegemons in America), our ruling class hates us, Dems are openly calling for political violence against “deplorables”, partisanship and public rancor are approaching pre-Civil War I levels, and a shadow Deep State administrative government is attempting a silent coup against the President.

Which is to say, we’re living in a Black Swan era. The election of Trump was a black swan. These midterms may be another. Past results aren’t necessarily indicative of future performance.

One other point I’d make: in part owing to the fevered partisanship and cratering trust of American society, it’s likely that social expectation bias is playing a much bigger role in polling results than it has in the past. Americans, especially those on the right, are now a lot more circumspect about revealing their true voting preferences to pollsters (or to anyone for that matter) because they don’t want to deal with the headache of triggering shitlibs to weeping. If conservatives feel less secure publicly airing their beliefs, then they will be less likely to answer pollsters and more likely to lie about how they’ll vote, skewing poll data.

Which would mean another unforeseen silent Trump vote like we had two years ago.

Shitlib Logic Trap!

Nellie Ohr, wife of Bruce Ohr — both of whom are key deep staters in the coordinated attempted coup of President Trump — just invoked marital privilege in her refusal to testify before congressional committees.

This is why the Creep State likes to keep it in the family. Marital privilege is an escape route if the heat comes around the corner.

I won’t plaster the Ohrs’ mugs here. I don’t want to soil the glory of this Chateau. You can image search yourselves. Let’s just say that it’s great normies are learning just how grotesque their putative “elites” are. The curtain is pulled all the way back and the Lizard of Poz flicks its tongue at you.


More updates:

Congressman Mark Meadows has called for Rod Rosenstein to resign.

Former FBI lawyer James Baker appeared on Capitol Hill earlier Thursday for the second time to testify about Rosenstein’s plan to wear a wire and and the use of FISA warrants to oust President Trump from office. […]

MEADOWS: Based on additional information we’ve learned over the last week, it is clear Rod Rosenstein should resign immediately.

He has not cooperated with Congress, failed to be transparent about his actions, and shown a lack of candor in the way he’s characterized a number of events. […]

James Baker previously told Congressional investigators that Rosenstein’s plot to wear a wire and oust Trump from office was not a joke as the DAG claimed.

The chutzpah! I guess these seditionists think they can get away with their treachery, thanks to a “mainstream” media colluding with ClintonObama Inc.


A federal judge says he was given false statements by State Department rats in an effort to derail the investigation into Clinton’s Benghazi debacle.

In a combative exchange at a hearing Friday in Washington, D.C., a federal judge unabashedly accused career State Department officials of lying and signing “clearly false” affidavits to derail a series of lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth also said he was “shocked” and “dumbfounded” when he learned that FBI had granted immunity to former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills during its investigation into the use of Clinton’s server, according to a court transcript of his remarks.

“I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief, and I was quite shocked to find out she had been given immunity in — by the Justice Department in the Hillary Clinton email case,” Lamberth said during the hearing.

Heeeeellllooooooo? NPR? You reporting on this? *crickets*

A reader quips: “Non Player Radio”.


In a bit of potentially good news, there may be a “red wave” materializing (again) to confound Dems and Dem-friendly pollsters.

Over 12,000 Voters Change Party Affiliation in Wyoming – 90% to Republican

We’ll see soon enough. I’ll stick by my prediction that the House will be a close call and Rs will gain a couple seats in the Senate. Trump will come out of it unscathed, because he’s got that je ne sais quoi.


OT: The spiritual physiognomy of african man. (Deep Slate Update? Dark State Update?)

What kind of civilization could eventually blossom and take root in this spiritual ground, I cannot even begin to imagine. The safest guess would be nothing. It goes without saying that the African soul is wholly incompatible with European law, society, and culture.

Executive summary: The spiritual phyzz of black africans is demonic possession. It’s a good read, check it out.

From Callmelennie, a hilarious glimpse at the misunderstandings and umbrage which occur when racially distinct dating markets commingle:

RE: True Racism in Online Dating

Engaged a woman on a senior online dating site (cause that’s the stage I’m at). We started in on a good conversation. At about ten minutes in, she texted, “Well I have to hand it to you; it’s been ten minutes and you have yet to say — Hey Momma, I’d love to put a dick in your face.”

This to a woman who was 61 with two adult children, one of whom was 40 years old .. who had also lost a daughter in a car accident. And I responded, “Who’s saying this sort of thing …. as if I dont know” And she texted “LOL, how do you know?”

And I came back, “Well, I decided to check out my competition and I couldn’t help but notice (looking over both shoulders) a large grouping of melanin enriched gentlemen of a Sub-Saharan heritage on this site.” Turned out that every contact initiated by a bro started out exactly like that, and that she had been obliged to block hundreds of said individuals.

Zero Standards, Zero Charm, Zero Self-Awareness: there’s your MUH DIK.

Sadly, the ZERO BRO pickup method works a little too often on the thicker-filled of our sisters to write it off as a dickless threat. The good news is that, really, only black women think it’s the pinnacle of flirtatious charm.

Would it be correct to call ZERO BRO the epitome of beta male thirst?

The script sure reads like Thirst, The Trilogy.

  • hitting on old women
  • lunkheaded sexual solicitations
  • hundreds of come-ons

But what distinguishes purpa thirst from what we conventionally know as beta male thirst is the general lack of romantic sincerity.

Beta male thirst is a stain on the northern races of man. These are the pedestal polishers who throw themselves at the ASCII feet of HB6s, lavishing them with likes, compliments and offers of asexual cuddles. Beta male thirst also clings to a vestige of mate selection standards, and for that reason you will rarely see grandmas get slobbered over by Eurasian betas. Not even the desperate omega euros will sink to Emmanuel Macron’s level.

Purpa thirst is wild, chaotic, brutally sexual, nondiscriminatory, and devoid of subterfuge. It is the shotgun approach to courtship that uses stink pellets of which few women but the most desperate welcome the musk. Superficially, the two thirst types share traits — the shameless begging, the NPC flattery, the anti-Game — but the divergence is noticeable by how quickly purpa thirst abandons its uncooperative targets and by the stark difference in declared sexual intent.

That last reason alone is probably why purpa thirst manages to eke out a rare victory where beta male thirst always ends in a sad fap. There are a non-trivial number of women who will misinterpret brute force sexual come-ons as male dominance, and submit accordingly.

Nations are in fact distinct geopolitical systems for privileging races and ethnicities. If the heritage stock of a nation isn’t privileged, then what is the point of the nation? It has failed its fundamental duty.

A nation which privileges all comers, from alien races and cultures, will lose the loyalty of the race of people which established the nation for the benefit of themselves and their posterity. It will become de-nationed, a nation in name only, divorced from the mystic chords which historically composed it.

%d bloggers like this: