I’ve been reading a lot of Stephane Hemon’s stuff lately and what he talks about is similar to what I’ve been mulling over in my head and heart lately. I believe the circle is my next step in life. To do this, I’ll have to become totally comfortable with the idea of loss, because to reach this level you can’t be hobbled by risk aversion or ego protection.
Here’s a video of him with his three girls. His “primary” girlfriend is on the far right.
I could do without his focus on chakras and metaphysics, as that offends my rational mind, but his core understanding of women and their natures is solid. The psychobabble stuff is just prettified words for biological processes. You can’t argue with results, and maintaining a loving harem of cute girls is proof his skills are unassailable.
Here are a couple of points he makes in his writings which I feel are packed with wisdom:
“[You want to stay in your zone. A good metaphor would be] your circle of girls are playing under the oak tree.”
“If you are single, dating casually, or in a long-term relationship, keep on reading because every single interaction that you have with an attractive woman is, in fact, A RELATIONSHIP. You guys are relat-ing with each other, it’s just a matter of degree.”
That last point is critical. No longer will I draw such bright lines between friendships, dating, flings, and relationships. My new way of thinking is that every inspiring girl I meet is already in a relationship with me — we are already relating sexually and emotionally — and my male energy won’t be held in check by socially approved categories. This is love consciousness.
But of course there is still biological reality and it wouldn’t be very special of me to neglect to point out that Stephane’s main girlfriend (the one he met and fell in love with first) is the cutest of the three. Perhaps the Ego of Jealousy is not so easily transcended.

The vid is good. I wouldn’t doubt if the man is into Osho. Osho was very much into free expression of everything, including jealousy and negative emotions. He was never into suppression. He had a commune in Oregon where there was much joy, dancing, sex, free expression and celebration. Sex Matters is a great read. Like your new direction, if this is a trend.
LikeLike
The girl to his left, are those tatoos all over her arms and chest?
Seriously, dude, this reminded me of one of those ’60s communes you see in movies. A hirsute out-of-shape guy drawling on like a stoner with drug-addled ex-runaways meowing around him.
I should have been counting how many times he said “like.” At least the smelly hippies changed it up between “far out” and “dig that, man.”
I don’t see you in a cirlce. You come across as more upscale.
LikeLike
Fuck. I occassionally shoot the shit with a young guy on the train to work. He was in Iraq a year ago, had a superficial IED wound on his forearm and leg, got a Purple Heart out of it. He thinks he killed one or more insurgents (he says it’s hard to tell, he and the other guys in his squad concentrated their fire on them.)
He’s married, has a kid on the way. That’s a fucking Alpha, not some disgusting stoner scum with a couple of rot-cunt whores.
LikeLike
Osho was very much into free expression of everything, including jealousy and negative emotions.
So he was a fag. Whoever he was
The more seduction videos I skip, the more I’m convinced that much of the movement is made up of confused borderline gay nerds who need women to uphold their straight personas.
Ending denial would probably do more even for their luck with the ladies than all the New Age faggotry in the world. Has anyone ever heard of an honestly bi guy who’d complain about not getting any pussy?
LikeLike
I would caution against doing what he’s doing, regardless of what his insights are — there’s lots of research showing that these swinger, open relationships are doomed to failure. The girls get too jealous. If it’s polygyny, they can be OK with it since they’re getting support for their kids, but if you’re not married to them, they fight too much.
But it’s true that Game principles apply much more broadly than just male-female sexual relationships. I came up with a pretty neat mathematical model for it. It was inspired by how the Attraction stage of the Mystery Method works, but it works for any type of social relationship.
LikeLike
Nothing personal, but you are in fact a clueless jackass pretending to know something you know nothing about.
Well thanks to you I know we’re talking about some guy who was into “free expression of everything, including negative emotions”, so obviously I know that we’re talking about either
a) someone who actually believed that shit aka a metrosexual aka a fag in denial
or
b) a respectable con man who made up shit and collected massive loads of cash and pussy from New Age idiots who would such on horse dick if some guy called “Osho” told them to
LikeLike
9 Jackass
Very impressive.
LikeLike
Hey, if you like that kind of stuff, check out Blueprint by Real Social Dynamics, its along similar lines with less otherworldly bullshit.
LikeLike
Looked up some of this guys other videos and they are more coherent and intelligent, if you buy a dominant male perspective. But this one just looks like everybody is on X.
LikeLike
Wait, I’m supposed to be Virgil Kent?
Damn, I knew Bill Cosby wasn’t the right role model.
LikeLike
“Admittedly, it would probably be hard to get them all fondling each other and so forth. ”
answer? GHB.
LikeLike
GHB
http://www.projectghb.org/what_is_ghb.htm
LikeLike