• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Best New Song Of 2009
Getting Rusty »

Best Photo of 2009

April 12, 2009 by CH

Yeah, we’ve got nine more months in 2009, but this photo will not be beat.

polar bear nom noms on fat chick

Can’t fault the polar bear. He knows a delicious blubbery buffet when he sees it.

Share this:

  • Click to email (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Hungry Hungry Hippos, Ridiculousness, Tool Time | 250 Comments

250 Responses

  1. on April 12, 2009 at 7:40 pm bwahaha

    Love the video, where they try to lift her fat ass out of the water but she falls back in. Note to all global warming dipshits who want to save the polar bears: fuck the polar bears.

    LikeLike


  2. on April 12, 2009 at 7:44 pm Steve Johnson

    “A polar bear attacked a woman at Berlin Zoo Friday afternoon after she climbed a fence and jumped into its habitat during feeding time, police said Saturday.”

    Dude, wtf?

    Hey, I’ll jump into a polar bear habitat. I’ll just do it. Nah, can’t just do it, this’ll take some planning. First, I’ll eat donuts until I’m the size of an adult seal. Ok, check. Next step, pick a good time to jump in. I know, feeding time. It’ll be distracted and I can pet him! This plan is foolproof. What could go wrong?

    LikeLike


  3. on April 12, 2009 at 7:44 pm whiskey

    Jeez. I mean … just words don’t describe.

    LikeLike


  4. on April 12, 2009 at 7:48 pm PA

    Is she mentally ill? bipolar manic epoisode or a schizophrenic attack? If so, then poor thing…

    If not… then…

    HAHHAAAAHAHHAAHAH!! FAT DUMB BITCH!! HAAHHAAA First, I’ll eat donuts until I’m the size of an adult seal. stiop it ahhaahhaahaha YOURE KILLIN’ ME! hahhahaahha!!

    LikeLike


  5. on April 12, 2009 at 7:50 pm Gunslingergregi

    Yea dam wtf hey if you can’t get a man to love you getting eaten by a polar bear the next best thing I guess.

    LikeLike


  6. on April 12, 2009 at 7:51 pm Gunslingergregi

    Oh shit that looks like it could be the fat version of my ex-wife who knew.

    LikeLike


  7. on April 12, 2009 at 7:51 pm ChinaGuy

    Gold. Just pure gold.

    LikeLike


  8. on April 12, 2009 at 7:57 pm Barack Obama

    The CEO of Maerst Alabama wanted to give $2million to the Somali Pirates…instead, the Prez orderd Navy Seals to take out the somali Pirates with sniper fire.

    That is pure ALPHA.

    All special operation actions needs to be authorized by the Prez.

    LikeLike


  9. on April 12, 2009 at 7:59 pm Firepower

    Roissy = jewish

    Dirty filthy jew. Contaminating pure ARYAN blood.

    You are inferior. Only ARYAN are alphas.

    LikeLike


  10. on April 12, 2009 at 8:03 pm Wanker

    This photo of stupid SWPL doing “DOGA”…that is yoga with your dog. Beats that shit. Crazy white people.

    LikeLike


  11. on April 12, 2009 at 8:05 pm HUNGRY HUNGRY HIPPOS YO

    I wish more fat chicks were eaten by polar bears.

    LikeLike


  12. on April 12, 2009 at 8:06 pm Gunslingergregi

    I guess the question is which one of you would have jumped in to rescue her clan of the cave bear style?

    Whiskey?

    LikeLike


  13. on April 12, 2009 at 8:06 pm Wounded Animal

    What an idiot. Like that faggot “Grizzly Man.”

    BTW, survival tip for women: don’t get so fucking fat that it becomes way difficult for men to rescue your sorry ass.

    LikeLike


  14. on April 12, 2009 at 8:06 pm Bhetti

    Hungry Hippos: Not to be crude, but I think a new name for fat (white?) men who are partners with fat women has been invented.

    LikeLike


  15. on April 12, 2009 at 8:16 pm Wounded Animal

    The Big Fat Lie:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/07/magazine/what-if-it-s-all-been-a-big-fat-lie.html?sec=health

    LikeLike


  16. on April 12, 2009 at 8:17 pm dougjnn

    Ah, gotta love Roissy. Not many other very high hit rate blogs would celebrate a bear chomping into a fatso woman. For shear outrageousness if nothing else.

    LikeLike


  17. on April 12, 2009 at 8:18 pm Roissy = Chauvinistic Pig!!

    I am sure you will like your friend Silvio Berlusconi, Italian prime minister, Humping a parking meter blonde.

    I mean, how can you do that!?! Just randomnly humping any woman!?!

    LikeLike


  18. on April 12, 2009 at 8:20 pm dougjnn

    I guess her wonderously harmonious, peaceful if peacefully treated natural world philosophy may need some adjustment now?

    LikeLike


  19. on April 12, 2009 at 8:24 pm dougjnn

    Roissy = Chauvinistic Pig!!–

    Hey monumento stupido, he wasn’t humping her. He was play humping her by way of expressing playful male dominance over her, in a world where that very much isn’t taken for granted.

    Kudos Berlesconi!!! Fuck you feminism.

    LikeLike


  20. on April 12, 2009 at 8:25 pm Carl Sagan

    Lulz!

    LikeLike


  21. on April 12, 2009 at 8:30 pm Roissy = Chauvinistic Pig!!

    Dougjn, how about Silvio do that to your mom?

    How about your sister or daughter?

    Maybe even your girlfriend, or wife.

    How do you like them apples?

    Bitch.

    LikeLike


  22. on April 12, 2009 at 8:31 pm Dougjn = Idiot

    Dougjn, how about Silvio do that to your mom?

    How about your sister or daughter?

    Maybe even your girlfriend, or wife.

    How do you like them apples?

    Bitch.

    LikeLike


  23. on April 12, 2009 at 8:34 pm J

    That’s not Berlusconi but an actor, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he really did something like that.

    LikeLike


  24. on April 12, 2009 at 8:35 pm dougjnn

    Outraged pinky dicked Roissy = Chauvinistic Pig!!-

    Dougjn, how about Silvio do that to your mom?

    How about your sister or daughter?

    Maybe even your girlfriend, or wife.

    You mean the President of the United States did?

    Ummm, I’m guessing any one of them would survive just fine. And dine out for the rest of their lives with the tale.

    LikeLike


  25. on April 12, 2009 at 8:40 pm Gunslingergregi

    The sad part now is they will have to make some huge gate so people don’t jump in with polar bears even though this is not a normal occurance. And the people will not be able to see them as well.

    LikeLike


  26. on April 12, 2009 at 8:43 pm Tarl

    Now, everyone be nice, that was Ian in Hamburg’s wife who almost got eaten!

    LikeLike


  27. on April 12, 2009 at 8:46 pm dougjnn

    Gunny

    The sad part now is they will have to make some huge gate so people don’t jump in with polar bears even though this is not a normal occurance.

    I agree it’s sad they will, but I’m also outraged they will. Hey it’s a Darwin awards test. It’s great. It’s a culling potentiality.

    LikeLike


  28. on April 12, 2009 at 8:47 pm Roissy = Chauvinistic Pig!!

    Only a beta bitch will say it is okay for another man to fake fucked/cuckold his wife or mother or sister.

    You are not a man, dougjn–you are simply an obliging bitch of the powerfu or (people you think are in power.).

    How on God’s planet could it be okay for you to say Silvio should hump your wife? You are not a man.

    Maybe that is why you kiss up to Roissy so much. Never once challenging roissy.

    Fucking cocksucker cunt-eye slime shit.

    LikeLike


  29. on April 12, 2009 at 8:50 pm ironrailsironweights

    Polar bear liver is poisonous to humans.

    Peter

    LikeLike


  30. on April 12, 2009 at 8:51 pm dougjnn

    Roissy = Chauvinistic Pig!!

    Pathetic and massively insecure.

    LikeLike


  31. on April 12, 2009 at 8:52 pm Wounded Animal

    Roithy ith a thauvinithtic pig!

    LikeLike


  32. on April 12, 2009 at 8:53 pm dougjnn

    Tarl –

    HaaHaaHoo.

    LikeLike


  33. on April 12, 2009 at 8:56 pm Paul

    Just happened to be my video of the day. She bear-ly survived.

    LikeLike


  34. on April 12, 2009 at 9:02 pm Roissy = Chavuinistic Pig!!

    Here is Dougjn, begging Roissy to fuck his wife.

    Fucking fag!

    You should change your name from Dougjn to
    Dou–“please fuck my wife”– gjn.

    LikeLike


  35. on April 12, 2009 at 9:03 pm dougjnn

    Listen you all, you HAVE to watch Paul’s video link just above. It’s even better. Way better.

    “the bear she chose seemed not to be so progressive ….”

    You have to see and hear to believe. Well maybe you already do.

    LikeLike


  36. on April 12, 2009 at 9:04 pm dougjnn

    Roissy = Chavuinistic Pig!!

    Asswipe. The Italian super stud billionaire PM did a 1 sec play grind on the woman in question.

    LikeLike


  37. on April 12, 2009 at 9:06 pm dougjnn

    Oh, Paul’s video link is about exactly this incident is almost certainly where the pic Roissy posted was clipped from.

    LikeLike


  38. on April 12, 2009 at 9:19 pm ironrailsironweights

    Ugh … a hideous pedophilic Bald Eagle.

    Peter

    LikeLike


  39. on April 12, 2009 at 9:23 pm bwahaha

    “Ugh … a hideous pedophilic Bald Eagle”

    Listen. There’s something VERY wrong with that pic, but it’s not the shaved pussy, you see.

    LikeLike


  40. on April 12, 2009 at 9:32 pm PA

    Disgusting photo!

    I know that there is such thing as faggotry but that knowledge alone didn’t prepare me for the wrongness of that pic.

    LikeLike


  41. on April 12, 2009 at 9:34 pm Rum

    Apparently the silly woman did not read the sign that said, “Don’t feed the bears!”
    I think sometimes that the best thing would be if no rescue were provided for terminally stupid animal worshipers like the Crazy German Fat Chick. Instead, just let them spend lots of quality with Mr. Icebear and keep the cameras rolling. Then play the results in every elementary school so that kids everywhere can learn how a for real top-of-the-food-chain predator regards humanity. Hint, bears usually start by eating the “salad” they find below the ribs.

    LikeLike


  42. on April 12, 2009 at 9:46 pm Rum

    There is Nothing wrong with that pic! Maybe if the deranged fat chick were naked it would be more compelling but I doubt it. The presence of a bathing suit just underlines the extremity of her delusional-ness. I mean, the bear with whom she intends to bond is not wearing a bathing suit, right? But then, he is a bear. If she were a she-bear she would not either.
    What she really wanted was for Mr. 1200 lb. bear to rip that suit right off her take her as His. 17 in. of bear meat driven like in a piledriver. Alas, she failed to interest him in that because all he could see was the edible layers of lard-flesh.

    LikeLike


  43. on April 12, 2009 at 9:47 pm PA

    There is Nothing wrong with that pic

    I was referring to Peter’s disturbing photo.

    LikeLike


  44. on April 12, 2009 at 9:49 pm PA

    Supposedly sharks don’t eat humans as often as they could because they find us too bony. They’ll often bite a person’s arm or leg and swim away uninterested.

    They’d feel differently about us if that fat chick decided to bond with sharks rather than bears.

    LikeLike


  45. on April 12, 2009 at 9:55 pm Gunslingergregi

    Dam run went midevil on that shit.

    LikeLike


  46. on April 12, 2009 at 10:00 pm Cannon's Canon

    I don’t remember seeing this on Dealbreaker!

    LikeLike


  47. on April 12, 2009 at 10:00 pm Gunslingergregi

    rum went midevil.

    Wierd right bear didn’t go for head kill. Wonder why not. Although pics of real polar bear attack. Bear ate the dudes calf/leg/ankle area. Like it wanted him in pain. He killed it while it was doing this. All you saw was the acheales tendon attached at the heal no meat.

    LikeLike


  48. on April 12, 2009 at 10:00 pm Sunday Edition: Another Crazy White Person

    This one killed her children playmate. So much for the superiority of the white race.

    http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/04/11/california.girl.arrest/

    LikeLike


  49. on April 12, 2009 at 10:05 pm Roissy = Chavuinistic pig!!

    The picture below is that of Roissy’s Dog = Dougjnn, and Roissy, and Dougjnn’s wife.

    Roissy’s Dog = Dougjnn, confess happily to wanting another man fuck his wife. A better man than he is.

    Dirty, dirty fuckin fairy.

    LikeLike


  50. on April 12, 2009 at 10:07 pm Gunslingergregi

    Satan: but all the white people are crazy
    God: no satan you have just been watching what is called tv
    Satan: I don’t get it
    God: you will one day when you grow up.

    LikeLike


  51. on April 12, 2009 at 10:10 pm Gunslingergregi

    What is up with people from london lol that is what the blue square represents.

    LikeLike


  52. on April 12, 2009 at 10:21 pm dougjnn

    Roissy = Chavuinistic pig!!

    Teeny little peewee. If we met up in person you’d be lucky to live. Oh yeah. literally. Oh and no I wouldn’t pay for it.

    LikeLike


  53. on April 12, 2009 at 10:37 pm anon

    Completely off-topic, but just wanted to bring to Roissy’s attention, more Devlin:

    http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/devlin_home_ec_06.htm

    LikeLike


  54. on April 12, 2009 at 10:38 pm Chuck

    Roissy = Chauvinistic pig reminds me of Amy Poehler’s character with Tourette’s in “Deuce Bigalow”

    LikeLike


  55. on April 12, 2009 at 11:19 pm whiskey

    I don’t think anyone would rescue that chick. Stupidity cubed. I mean … WTF?

    Seriously. That’s a metaphor for Europe these days. Sadly.

    LikeLike


  56. on April 12, 2009 at 11:42 pm Tood

    This shows how stupid the enviro-lefto-faggots are.

    They think that polar bears are cute, cuddly, and lovable. Their purported knowledge of wildlife somehow did not mention that Polar Bears are just about the most dangerous land animal to humans, as the roam desolate frozen lands, where just about any other smaller creature is automatically considred prey. Far more dangerous than a Grizzly Bear, which eats mostly plants.

    LikeLike


  57. on April 12, 2009 at 11:43 pm Tood

    Actually, this is perfect natural selection at work :

    Fat Woman = Too heavy to rescue
    Fat Woman = A more tantalizing meal for a polar bear than a think woman
    Dumb Women = Weeds herself out of the gene pool and tax-eater pool.

    LikeLike


  58. on April 12, 2009 at 11:44 pm Gunslingergregi

    Don’t you find it interesting that there was a whole row of people watching and they where only throwing life preservers at the bears (which seemed to actually repulse the one) instead of maybe some stones.

    LikeLike


  59. on April 12, 2009 at 11:51 pm Goering

    Knowing modern Germany, throwing stones at the bears is likely an arrestable offense, even in an emergency situation.

    LikeLike


  60. on April 12, 2009 at 11:58 pm Gunslingergregi

    Maybe although I only got pulled over once there for thinking I was drinking and driving (no speeding tickets) and never got in trouble for fucking translated making love in the car or the woods. Guess take good with bad on that one. Safe place but if a bear come on land it will just eat everyone. Not a bad trade I guess lol

    LikeLike


  61. on April 13, 2009 at 5:07 am contrarian

    I heard about this guy who broke into a lion’s den at the zoo
    and got mauled
    and people were talking about how there should have been better defences put up to prevent people getting into the cage
    a friend of mine suggested setting up some kind of deterrent
    for example, putting some sort of fierce animal in the cage, which would attack anybody who climbed in

    —bash.org

    LikeLike


  62. on April 13, 2009 at 6:09 am nilk

    Agreed the woman is a total moron. Pity she didn’t manage to take herself out of the gene pool.

    If there wasn’t video evidence I’d find it difficult to believe that people can be so farking stupid.

    That goes for grizzly boy Treadwell, too. No sympathy.

    LikeLike


  63. on April 13, 2009 at 6:35 am RF Interference

    Zoos have all the luck. If you have a dangerous dog in your house and someone breaks in and gets bitten you can still be sued. Damn zoos have sweet attack bears to protect their enclosures and this moron rightly gets charged with trespassing.

    LikeLike


  64. on April 13, 2009 at 6:52 am I Fucked Ann Coulter in the Ass, Hard.

    The Farmer’s Market on Fairfax and 3rd is a Los Angeles landmark, attracting tourists and everyday Angelinos alike, as well as many famous faces. Among the celebrities I have seen there are Muhammad Ali, Terri Garr, Tyra Banks, Laura Linney, Keenan Ivory Wayans, the guitarist for The Cult, Lawrence Hilton-Jacobs, and Weird Al Yankovic.

    But Ann Coulter is the only celebrity I’ve ever spotted at Farmer’s Market that I wound up fucking in the ass, hard.

    It would be fair to observe that my feeling obligated to present the list of celebrities above in roughly Black-White-Black-White order is indicative of my own carefully Liberal sensibilities. And that this sort of conscientiousness is more than a little ridiculous, on examination. But what I notice about myself only on reflection, Ann Coulter seemed to recognize and respond to in an instant, like a puma recognizes an injured giselle. For Ann Coulter is a predator. A predator with a hungry asshole.

    I first spotted her sitting at a table in front of The Gumbo Pot with another woman who looked not unlike her, but a generation older (I neglected to ask her at any point subsequently whether this had in fact been her mother). I vaguely recognized her—there’s always a lag time placing faces you know from cable when unconfined to a telescreen—and began to notice, stealing furtive glances up from the copy of Steinbeck I was reading, that she was eyeing me with unsettling scrutiny.

    The next thing I knew, her companion (mother?) had left and Coulter was standing over me, looking skeptically at my reading material.
    ‘The Grapes of Wrath, huh?’
    ‘Yes’ I said, faking composure. ‘It’s fantastic.’
    ‘It’s a fantastic primer for vacuous proto-Communists everywhere,’ she said dismissively.
    ‘I don’t know about that..’
    She sighed. ‘I don’t have enough ink in my pen to keep a running list of what you don’t know. May I?’
    She motioned to the empty chair next to me.
    ‘Of course.’ It would be fair to say my voice trembled a little.
    She sat and said nothing. Ann Coulter evidently takes an unappreciative view of small talk. That she was eager to continue antagonizing me became evident when I re-opened my recently-insulted book to resume reading. A young man passed in a t-shirt proclaiming ‘Iraq Nam’. She stopped him.
    ‘1. Haircut. 2. Shower. 3. Get a job, you sniveling hippy,’ she glowered. ‘You’re probably too high to remember that, so write it down–if you can write.’
    He looked at her with dismay and scampered away like a kicked cat. She turned to me with bloodlust.
    ‘What do you think of the war: complete success, or very nearly complete success?’ she asked.
    ‘Well, in no time—barring the strong possibility of Civil War–we’ll have a democratically-elected anti-US Islamicist government in charge of the world’s second-largest oil reserves, so I’d have to say only very-nearly, on the complete success scale, at a hysterically distorted best.’
    She showed her teeth. ‘It sounds to me like you don’t support our troops.’
    ‘I think that ‘Support Our Troops’ business is the most crass, craven cowardice ever to go unquestioned by the allegedly Liberal media.’
    ‘Yes? Yes?’ There was oddly growing excitement in her voice.
    ‘It allows the Administration to absolve itself of responsibility for its own flawed policy. It’s no different than if you sent a classroom of 2nd graders into a burning building, and when anyone objects you throw in their face that they “don’t support our 2nd graders”’
    ‘Where do you live?’
    ‘A few blocks away.’
    ‘Take me there.’

    When we got to my apartment, she looked around glumly.
    ‘I was thinking you’d have half-burned American flags up on the wall,’ she said, disappointed.
    ‘That’s ridiculous. I love my country.’
    ‘Whatever you think that means,’ she said, rolling her eyes. ‘Don’t you have anything nasty to say about the President?’
    ‘Like what?’
    ‘Like he’s an imbecile, or corrupt, or a corrupt imbecile—the usual sore-loser bitter chatter.’
    ‘To be honest, I didn’t like the nasty things that were said about Clinton, and I’ve decided to have respect for the Office, no matter who holds it. I don’t think President Bush is corrupt or an imbecile anyway. Would you like something to drink?’
    ‘I think maybe this was a mistake,’ she said, starting to go.
    ‘That’s not to say I don’t disagree strongly with many of his policies and objectives.’
    She seemed to reconsider. ‘Like what?’
    ‘I don’t know. Name one.’
    ‘Get me a drink first.’

    With every point I expressed that ran counter to a view she held, she removed one article of clothing. Soon she sat on my couch naked, gently pulling at her untrimmed pubic hair, staring intently but not quite invitingly at me. The growing hard lump in my throat was just outpaced by the one in my pants. I was a little nervous because we had agreed on the last two points—the need to reconsider the option of nuclear energy, and drilling in the Arctic—and I noticed her oversized nipples were no longer hard. Luckily, she was, by this point, determined.
    ‘What do you think,’ she began provocatively, ‘of the President’s plan to privatize Social Security?’
    I sighed with relief; this was as sure a promise to seal the deal as her asking if I had a condom.
    ‘I think it’s a payoff to the Americans the President has always been most intent on pleasing: the richest 1%.’
    ‘What do you mean?’ she cooed. I noticed her nipples hardening once more. She dropped to her knees in front of me. She pushed me backwards and positioned my legs up in the air.
    ‘A stock’s value is even now only partially tied to the actual value of any publicly traded company. But who’s going to profit from inflated valuations when stock prices swell irrationally from the forced, artificial injection of capital?
    Her breath was hot on my ‘taint as she lifted my scrotum. ‘Yes? Yes?’
    ‘You might as well shoehorn billions of dollars into the Baseball Card market. The price of a Derek Jeter rookie will be driven up to hundreds of thousands of dollars—before the bubble bursts and the whole market crashes massively.’ It was getting hard to stay on point as she tongue-fucked my shitter vigorously.
    ‘Don’t..Stop!!’ her contorted mouth pled from my butthole.
    ‘The top 1% will sell stocks at the inflated valuations to the novice investors-by-necessity, the market will swell and crash, and the same 1% will come back and re-purchase their holdings at pennies on the dollar. Meanwhile, Social Security will go bankrupt and all the novice investors will be eating catfood for the duration of their “golden years,’’ barring a massive Federal bailout several hundred times in excess of what the Savings & Loan scandal cost us.’
    She sprung up on the couch on all fours and looked over her shoulder at me. She pointed to her twitching, puckered anus. ‘See this?’
    I nodded eagerly.
    ‘I want you to wreck it.’
    I spit on my skeezer-pleaser and, prying her ass cheeks apart like a hot dinner roll, drove it home, into the biggest browneye I had ever seen. She gurgled contentedly. Every thrust of my babymaker was met with a wrenched squeal as I grabbed her by the hips and began really leaning into it.
    ‘Harder!’ she begged, ‘Harder!! Tell me what you think of Chomsky!’
    ‘I..think..he’s..brill..iant..but..I..don’t really agree with much of his stance on Israel, and–’
    ‘You’re slowing down!’ she snapped. ‘DON’T SLOW DOWN!’
    I went back to punishing her asshole, giving no thought whatsoever to compassionate conservatism as her chocolate socket gnawed on my pork pipe. She was babbling now, as out of a delirious reverie.
    ‘Feed it,’ Ann Coulter rasped. ‘Feed my hungry asshole!’
    I buried her face in a throw pillow and she swiveled her hips back on my fuckstick with obvious appreciation. My pace quickened as my man-magma built towards eruption.
    ‘Wait!’ she gasped, sensing the fuse on my yogurt cannon was burning quick. ‘I want to take you ass-to-mouth!’
    I withdrew from her puckerhole with an audible ‘pop’ and she scrambled around, gulping at my wang-dang-doodle as though the lives of all her loved ones hinged on her marks for enthusiasm. Her eyes rolled up pleadingly as she threw her head down again and again on my magic johnson. I knew what she wanted.
    ‘There is a specter haunting Europe,’ I began, and she started to convulse spasmodically with her own thrashing orgasm, her head now dribbling in a blur against my groin. I repeated every Karl Marx quote I could think of until I reached my own ‘historic inevitability’ and launched surge after surge from my hairy boda bag. I ejaculated with what seemed like enough force to blow out the back of her head–but her head was made of stronger stuff. She sputtered, gobbled and gulped what I’d have to call a very liberal, even radically so, quantity of hot splooey.
    Once she caught her breath, she wiped her mouth, stood, and took me by the hand.
    ‘Let’s go to the bathroom.’
    ‘Why?’
    She seemed surprised I had to ask. Her tone was that of someone reminding another of something too obvious to need mention.
    ‘Uh, so I can get in the tub and you can piss all over me?’

    I sat in a robe and watched her as she dressed.
    ‘Will I see you again?’ I asked tentatively.
    ‘Sure,’ she said, pointing to the TV. ‘On that.’
    Some moments passed. I tried to dispel the awkward silence.
    ‘Well, nice meeting you,’ I offered.
    ‘You’ve really got a gift for tedious small talk,’ she shot back.
    I was a little hurt and, recognizing this, she softened just a shade as she reached for her purse to leave.
    ‘Hey.’
    ‘Yes?’ I asked.
    ‘Thanks for not staring at my adam’s apple.’
    ‘No problem.’
    She let herself out without another word, and I sat in the late afternoon silence alone. I considered how it felt to be a disposable instrument in someone’s personal debasement fantasy.

    All in all, it didn’t feel too bad.

    LikeLike


  65. on April 13, 2009 at 7:00 am Roissy = Chavunistic Pig!!

    To Chuck.

    Here is a picture of Chuck’s mom…doing what she does best.

    LikeLike


  66. on April 13, 2009 at 7:04 am pez

    The Darwin Awards almost got another one.

    LikeLike


  67. on April 13, 2009 at 7:10 am PA

    Children’s books always show wild animals as cute and friendly, never as fearsome and unpredictable. How hard can it be to write a children’s book on a level that a three-year-old can relate to that nevertheless teaches the kid a healthy respect for the forces of nature?

    LikeLike


  68. on April 13, 2009 at 8:00 am Glengarry

    This is kind of pathetic, dude. You’re like the omega troll.

    LikeLike


  69. on April 13, 2009 at 8:18 am Kthulah

    PA, that’s why I liked translations of German children’s books. They tend to do better in the cautionary tales department.

    …and not to nitpick, but I hope you’re all aware that a thinner woman would probably have been eaten whereas the bear likely saw the big woman as a threat/competitor for their food.

    …not that either is a great position to be in when facing a polar bear.

    LikeLike


  70. on April 13, 2009 at 8:31 am PA

    Kthulah, you mean classics like Hansel & Gretel? Very true.

    By the way, on a related topic, Jane Goodall and some of the other gorilla researchers had been selected to live among the Great Apes specifically because they were women — the males of the ape troop were expected to not kill them as they would have a (human) male researcher/interloper.

    Does that mean that Jane had to earn her keep among the gorillas by, um, submitting to the alpha male’s charms?

    LikeLike


  71. on April 13, 2009 at 8:42 am Kick a Bitch

    so glad we keep people like that in the gene pool

    notice how the fatty broke the first life preserver? shame the bears didn’t get to enjoy their snack…

    LikeLike


  72. on April 13, 2009 at 8:54 am Kthulah

    PA, I’m sure she at least had to groom him occasionally.

    Hansel and Gretel was one of my favorites as a child. They did well in increasing the chances that they would be found, playing on the witch’s ego, stalling, and not hesitating to strike at the best opportunity. That story, or at least the lessons learned from it, kept me from harm more than once in life.

    LikeLike


  73. on April 13, 2009 at 9:06 am Obsidian

    Earnest Question:

    *Why* do White folks do things like this? You know, always climinbing into wild animal habitats, “Grizzly Man” activity, “Into The Wild” stuff, and so on? It seems that only White folk, at least in America and the EU, do these things. I don’t recall hearing accounts of African Americans, Asians, etc engaged in such behaviors.

    So, I want to know, is what is it in the White Psyche that drives them to do this? At this point in the game, it’s more than a one off sort of thing but much more of a trend, and a disturbing one at that.

    I’m looking for earnest answers here-not diversion, ad hominem, or in any other way changing the subject. We need to find out WHY White folk tend to be more prone to these kinds of behaviors.

    Comments?

    The Obsidian

    LikeLike


  74. on April 13, 2009 at 9:14 am Anonymous

    White people care more about animals than non-whites do. Pretty simple really.

    LikeLike


  75. on April 13, 2009 at 9:23 am PA

    *Why* do White folks do things like this?

    A flattering answer: white folks have a drive to discover things and conquer their environment. As a great Victorian poet Lord Alfred Tennyson wrote, “To seek, to strive, to find, and not to yield.” Which, when properly channelled, leads to the discovery of new continents, development of science, domestication of animals, conquest of primitive people, acts of courage, and fun.

    An unflattering answer: many white folks are products of a an environment in which an ennui sets in on some individuals and causes them to misapply thier energies toward stupid ends.

    This particular case: I suspect that the woman is mentally ill. If that’s the case, my humor at her expense is retracted.

    LikeLike


  76. on April 13, 2009 at 9:34 am Firepower

    Luv the photo

    I busted
    a
    Knut

    LikeLike


  77. on April 13, 2009 at 9:51 am dougjnn

    Obsidian–

    *Why* do White folks do things like this?

    This particular woman is acting under religious delusion. Her particular religion is some version of German geenie loonyness.

    As I said above, in my second comment on this thread:

    I guess her wonderously harmonious, peaceful if peacefully treated natural world philosophy may need some adjustment now?

    LikeLike


  78. on April 13, 2009 at 9:52 am Roy G. Biv

    What would you do…. for a Klondike bar?

    LikeLike


  79. on April 13, 2009 at 10:00 am Obsidian

    Doug,
    So noted. But, it still doesn’t account for the fact that we have Grizzly Man, Into The Wild and the like. All White, too. We see this again and again, and unless you’re arguing for a religious angle being involved in all these cases, then I would say its one that seems to be lost on Peoples of Color. There has to be something in the White Psyche that speaks to this tendency; even in movies, White folks have to engage what appears to be extremely dangerous aliens (Alien, anyone?) in order to “study it”. Seems like other folk can study the same creatures from a comfortable distance.

    So again, the question remains: wassup with White folks doing this kind of stuff? What’s that all about?

    Comments?

    O

    LikeLike


  80. on April 13, 2009 at 10:07 am dougjnn

    Obsidian:

    White folks have to engage what appears to be extremely dangerous aliens (Alien, anyone?) in order to “study it”. Seems like other folk can study the same creatures from a comfortable distance.

    What other folks study the world’s creatures in any way remotely resembling the way whites have, since the European age of reason?

    LikeLike


  81. on April 13, 2009 at 10:12 am Obsidian

    Look who’s dodging and twisting in the wind now, eh? LOL! I’m asking you (and anyone else brave enough to actually tackle the question as asked): WHAT IS UP WITH WHITE FOLKS who do the kinds of things noted above? Why do they do this, when to most right thinking people, it’s highly risky, if not life threatening, behavior? Why? And why is it other races don’t seem to engage in this as much? Asians, for example, don’t do that anywhere near as much as Whites do. I mention them because for many Whites they’re an acceptable White alternative.

    Again: comments?

    O

    LikeLike


  82. on April 13, 2009 at 10:18 am dougjnn

    Obsidian-

    Look who’s dodging and twisting in the wind now, eh? LOL

    Humph. Utter delusion.

    LikeLike


  83. on April 13, 2009 at 10:24 am Obsidian

    Uh uh: clear and present proof and truth, lol.

    There’s definitely a “there” there, Doug, and is I would think a perfect opportunity for the amatuer race realists among us to really get their hands dirty: why do White folks act in this way? Grizzly Man, Into The Wild, the big German gal in the Polar Bear’s room, and so on? What is up with that? Why does it appear that only Whites do it? What does it say about the White Psyche? Wassup with dat?

    Ain’t no fun when the rabbit’s got the gun-is it, Doug?😉

    Comments?

    O

    LikeLike


  84. on April 13, 2009 at 10:25 am The King

    I wish the bitch “Rossy = Chauvinistic Pig” would know how to use the English language correctly. Just saying chauvinistic doesn’t specify anything, the words basically means just someone who is against a rival group. Can you please add “male” in front of chauvinist to make sure you don’t look like an idiot in the future.

    LikeLike


  85. on April 13, 2009 at 10:26 am ironrailsironweights

    If this happened in America, the woman would bring an enormous lawsuit against the zoo for failing to protect her from her own idiocy.

    Peter

    LikeLike


  86. on April 13, 2009 at 10:28 am ironrailsironweights

    By the way, on a related topic, Jane Goodall and some of the other gorilla researchers had been selected to live among the Great Apes specifically because they were women — the males of the ape troop were expected to not kill them as they would have a (human) male researcher/interloper.

    The woman who ran afoul of Travis the chimp would tell you that isn’t true, if she still had a mouth to speak with.

    Peter

    LikeLike


  87. on April 13, 2009 at 10:31 am Tarl

    WHAT IS UP WITH WHITE FOLKS who do the kinds of things noted above?

    Basically it comes down to a status contest. SWPL folks gain increased status among other SWPL folks by “caring” more about animals / the planet / the environment. Those who take it to the most impractical extreme (being eaten) gain the most status of all. Stupid? Yes, of course. But then a lot of the other SWPL status symbols are stupid.

    LikeLike


  88. on April 13, 2009 at 10:35 am ironrailsironweights

    Obsidian –

    To expand upon a point PA had made in an earlier comment, compared to minorities, white people in the United States are more likely to come from backgrounds in which physical danger is not significant. In some cases that might lead to a greater desire to take risks. Perhaps this is better expressed in the opposite sense: if you come from an environment in which physical danger is always present, for example a very high-crime neighborhood, you probably aren’t going to have much of a desire to engage in dangerous activities. That’s more likely to be the case with respect to minorities.

    Once again, in this specific case, it sounds as if the woman was mentally ill.

    Peter

    LikeLike


  89. on April 13, 2009 at 10:39 am dougjnn

    Obsidian–

    Your question was asked and answered by PA and myself in a rational, non race baiting sort of way, despite it’s intentionally provocative nature from the get go. You respond by ratcheting up your baiting in yet another attempt to get a race fight going. It’s old Obsidian.

    In another thread you recently declared your defensive posture only:

    For some reason, you refuse to see the fact that in almost every case, I’m responding to ideas and thoughts spewed out by others in this forum usually of a gratuitous nature

    I refuse because it isn’t true. It isn’t here for example.

    LikeLike


  90. on April 13, 2009 at 10:42 am Obsidian

    Hey Pete,
    Very good insight, and I think you may be correct: for example, I have ZERO desire to get to know a Bengal Tiger “better”, because I already have enough stuff on my plate as a Black Man trying to make it in America. But that only answers one part of the question, at best.

    The other part is, why don’t Asian Americans engage in such behaviors, since they’re pretty much in the same boat as their White/SWPL counterparts? They aren’t saddled with the ever present threat of injury or death that say, I am. So, again: wassup with that?

    Comments?

    O

    LikeLike


  91. on April 13, 2009 at 10:44 am dougjnn

    Iron/Peter

    Once again, in this specific case, it sounds as if the woman was mentally ill.

    Her religious delusions about how sweet big fury creatures of the natural world if you’re sweet to them, may be heightened by mental illness, but they don’t have to be. Unless you’re going to call all deep immersion in irrational faith mental illness.

    LikeLike


  92. on April 13, 2009 at 10:49 am dougjnn

    Iron / Peter

    If this happened in America, the woman would bring an enormous lawsuit against the zoo for failing to protect her from her own idiocy.

    Not only that, but she’d at least partially win her suit by the zoo settling for a tidey amount. Then their lawyers would tell them to shoot the bear in question, and they would. That’s what happened in San Fran with a lion or tiger I believe.

    LikeLike


  93. on April 13, 2009 at 10:50 am Obsidian

    Doug,
    Ok, let’s take it from the top:

    Roissy presents the forum w/a picture and story about a White Woman being what appears to be attacked by a Polar Bear in a zoo looking environment; suggesting, that somehow the Woman in question found her way into the former’s private space.

    Other posters then bring up the film Grizzly Man. Which is about a White Man who likes to study Grizzly Bears up close and personal. For his efforts he winds up their dinner.

    Obsidian sees an obvious thread running thru these and other related incidents. I note the common denominator, that they all seem to be White. I then ask why is that.

    PA, and Pete have indeed attempted to answer my query, for this I am grateful. And for the record, sure they could very well be true. But I like to probe the question just a bit more. Because, well, I can.

    This forum by its very nature, is provocative, Doug. That’s no big secret. I think it safe to say that if it wasn’t so, I nor the vast majority of folk who frequent this venue, would continue to do so. Including you.

    So for you to “accuse” me of making “provocative” statements is a distraction fromthe real issue on the table for examination, Doug. Nice try, but no cigar.

    What’s up with White folk who think they can commune with the world’s most dangerous animals? And why don’t other Races seem so interested in such things? Wassup with dat?

    Comments?

    O

    LikeLike


  94. on April 13, 2009 at 10:55 am PA

    I know someone who is suffering from a mental illness. A very pleasant, bright and attractive young woman when not having an episode. One of the sweetest people you could ever meet, which is what makes the illness that much more sad.

    But during a manic episode she does really stupid things. Thankfully nothing that would get her into physical or sexual trouble. But the manic episodes do involve her having an intense conviction of very irrational things.

    From what little I know of this German woman, it appears that she was mentally ill, just based on my having witnessed mentnally ill people’s behavior. Ingrid Newkirk or her acolytes at PeTA are unlikely to approach polar bears, no matter how fuzzy their feelings toward animals. Yes, they are crazy in their own way, but still grounded enough in reality to avoid getting eaten by bears.

    The Grizzly Guy also seemed the type who wasn’t alltogether there.

    LikeLike


  95. on April 13, 2009 at 10:58 am ironrailsironweights

    Then their lawyers would tell them to shoot the bear in question, and they would. That’s what happened in San Fran with a lion or tiger I believe.

    It was a tiger, and it was shot by police officers arriving on the scene.

    By the way, apropos of the racial comments, the people attacked in that incident were South Asian.

    Peter

    LikeLike


  96. on April 13, 2009 at 10:59 am Default User

    Obsidian

    WHAT IS UP WITH WHITE FOLKS who do the kinds of things noted above? Why do they do this, when to most right thinking people, it’s highly risky, if not life threatening, behavior? Why? And why is it other races don’t seem to engage in this as much?

    White Western media reports these events. They take place in countries where the majority of the population is white. Any population will have its share of fools. If the population is majority white then the majority of fools will be white. These events are infrequent so it is more likely to be a member of the majority population that tips over the edge.

    Example:
    Say that 0.001 percent of all people will engage in such behavior.
    That means 0.001 percent of all white and all non-white people will eventually feed themselves to the wildebeests.
    The number of candidates from the white population (.001 percent of 80 percent) will be tiny.
    The number of candidates from the non-white population (.001 percent of 20 percent) will be vanishingly small. Small enough to be effectively zero. [You have a chance of winning the lottery with one ticket, but in real-world numbers it is zero]

    But:
    If white people are a disproportional number of these idiots then your question might be interesting. Possible answers would revolve around white people living in ordered, well functioning communities in ordered, well functioning countries and thus needing to create “adventure.”

    And:
    The Japanese have game shows where the contestants put them selves through all kinds of unpleasant and dangerous physical trials. Weirdness knows no borders.

    LikeLike


  97. on April 13, 2009 at 11:01 am Obsidian

    PA,
    But, clearly, there are mentally unstable Black, Brown and Asian folk, yes? They know what zoos look like. Why aren’t we hearing stories of Kim, Chang, Jerome and Jose, doing what that Woman and Grizzly Man and Into The Wild guy did? Again-wassup wit dat?

    Comments?

    O

    LikeLike


  98. on April 13, 2009 at 11:04 am omw

    Some white people just have so freakin’ little connection with the world of blood and guts and childbirth and death and tragedy that they honestly cannot believe anything really bad could happen to them.

    They begin to feel that merely waking up in the morning and surviving till bedtime is Not Really Living.

    They have to push the limits to feel “alive.”

    From teenaged cutters to middle-aged hippies to the young dudes chasing storms, all part of the same Urge To Push, gone too far.

    But I find it amusing that people started defending Fat White Lady only AFTER you made it about white people in general.

    Well played, O! well played.

    LikeLike


  99. on April 13, 2009 at 11:07 am Obsidian

    Default,
    Sure, in India, Asia and Africa, I’m sure people are attacked maimed and killed by wild beasts all the time. But that’s a bit of a different question here-in most of those cases, the people aren’t deliberately doing the Grizzly Man thing. Big difference, I would think.

    There is definitely something in the post modern White Psyche at work here, that I think the “race men” need to seriously look at.

    Don’t you agree?

    Comments?

    O

    LikeLike


  100. on April 13, 2009 at 11:08 am omw

    Y’all remember that trust-fund kid who moved into a bus in Denali Park with nothing but the collected works of Tolstoy and five pounds of rice!

    He died of starvation, didn’t even have a map; when the bridge he’s crossed to his bus flooded over, he had no idea that a working bridge was just a few miles upriver. So he went back to his bus to die.

    White kid with a classic case of affluenza.

    LikeLike


  101. on April 13, 2009 at 11:08 am pez

    This isn’t racial or cultural, its stupidity at its best. There are stupid people everywhere.

    LikeLike


  102. on April 13, 2009 at 11:08 am Default User

    omw

    But I find it amusing that people started defending Fat White Lady only AFTER you made it about white people in general.

    Well played, O! well played.

    Ethnic solidarity. That is what all the immigration arguments are about.

    LikeLike


  103. on April 13, 2009 at 11:10 am Comment_Bear

    I just like to point out that the polar bear weighed around 1000 pounds and the woman couldn’t have been over three hundred. It wasn’t trying to kill her, or she would be dead.

    Polar bears are wild, dangerous animals, but they have animal thoughts going on behind their eyes.

    And now I post excessive cuteness to confuse the issue:

    Gunslinger said:

    Wierd right bear didn’t go for head kill. Wonder why not. Although pics of real polar bear attack. Bear ate the dudes calf/leg/ankle area. Like it wanted him in pain. He killed it while it was doing this. All you saw was the acheales tendon attached at the heal no meat.

    The bear was trying to kill the man. The bear crippled his leg so he couldn’t run. Wild animals have trouble understanding guns, so he shot the bear and it died. Head kills are for humans with guns. In the animal world, the head is to heavily protected to be a target. Normally, break the spine, cripple the leg, and I’m sure nature has come up with another few tricks. That’s why joggers get attacked when tying thier shoes, they bend over and the cougar can finally reach their neck. That bear definitely thought the man was for dinner if it tried to cripple his leg.

    LikeLike


  104. on April 13, 2009 at 11:11 am omw

    Ha, yes. I’m a big believer in ethnic solidarity, don’t get me wrong. Just it’s funny how it gets expressed sometimes.

    “She may be a fat crazy bitch, but she’s OUR fat crazy bitch, negro!”

    LikeLike


  105. on April 13, 2009 at 11:11 am Default User

    Obsidian

    Sure, in India, Asia and Africa, I’m sure people are attacked maimed and killed by wild beasts all the time.

    True. That is why these incidents are neither reported on or commented on. But what has that got to do with my comment?

    LikeLike


  106. on April 13, 2009 at 11:12 am PA

    Can’t say what it is about those people and wild animals. On some race-realist sites it’s written that whites have a unique fondness for animals, in contrast with other races, whose tratment of animals is often extremely cruel. Is that also a white / nonwhite thing? I don’t know.

    But thinking back to my childhood when I read stories of 19th century explorers to other continents, I recall tales of their shock with the unhumane ways that animals were kept. Then again, we also have inhumane industrial livestock farms, so there ya go.

    Peter made a good point about the San Francisco Zoo tiger cage guys being South Asian, so maybe the animal encounters are not just a white thing.

    LikeLike


  107. on April 13, 2009 at 11:14 am Obsidian

    *winks at OMW*😉

    O

    LikeLike


  108. on April 13, 2009 at 11:18 am omw

    Now, save your winks for Brown Suga and the other single ladies, O. LOL.

    LikeLike


  109. on April 13, 2009 at 11:19 am Default User

    omw

    Ha, yes. I’m a big believer in ethnic solidarity, don’t get me wrong. Just it’s funny how it gets expressed sometimes.

    “She may be a fat crazy bitch, but she’s OUR fat crazy bitch, negro!”

    I am not sure anyone is defending this silly woman, merely questioning that it is a “white thing.”

    LikeLike


  110. on April 13, 2009 at 11:25 am dougjnn

    OMW

    Some white people just have so freakin’ little connection with the world of blood and guts and childbirth and death and tragedy that they honestly cannot believe anything really bad could happen to them.

    It takes more than the money. It also requires a certain type of moonbat leftism. I’d be really surprised to hear about any kind of conservative following in the footsteps of the German zoo woman above, the Grizzly man, or that trust fund kid who holed up in a bus with some rice in Denali park.

    It is partly a version of loony leftism as religion that leads to this.

    LikeLike


  111. on April 13, 2009 at 11:27 am dougjnn

    OMW–

    Actually I think it’s types of moonbat leftism that are entirely responsible for this. The “affluenza” you rightly site contributes to the impulse to adopt this moonbat type of leftism.

    LikeLike


  112. on April 13, 2009 at 11:30 am Obsidian

    Comment Bear,
    What it has to do with your question is the motivations of the people involved. In the cases of non Whites, they may not be trying to “commune” with lions, tigers and bears. In the cases we’ve been discussing there was deliberate actions taken on the place of Whites to place themselves in high risk scenarios. And it appears, by all accounts, to be only White folks who regularly do this. So I’m asking, wassup with that; what is it in the White Psyche that leads to this? It even plays itself out in movies, like Alien(s) and the like.

    Comments?

    O

    LikeLike


  113. on April 13, 2009 at 11:34 am PA

    That’s why joggers get attacked when tying thier shoes, they bend over and the cougar can finally reach their neck.

    Demi Moore has a thing for giving hickeys to joggers?

    LikeLike


  114. on April 13, 2009 at 11:35 am benjack

    I remember one story last year about a chinese kid who jumped a fence in a chinese zoo to hug a panda bear and got scratched up pretty good. He said “it was just so cute and cuddly”…

    LikeLike


  115. on April 13, 2009 at 11:37 am PA

    So I’m asking, wassup with that

    Aside from the mental illness explanation, the hypotheses of whites’ (a) proclivities toward curiosity/exploration, (b) SWPL status game escalation, and (c) fondness for animals were thrown out there.

    Also examples of similar behaviors by non-whites were cited.

    Those were all unsatisfactory and there is another angle you’re looking for?

    LikeLike


  116. on April 13, 2009 at 11:37 am omw

    Yes, but a couple generations’ worth of affluence seems to be the inevitable precursor.

    You can be rich and not have leftish kids, but you’ll probably have leftish grandkids. Not saying they’ll actually take the long walk off the short plank, though.

    It’s the HIV before the AIDS, the lingering flu before the pneumonia, the low greenish clouds before the Big Twister.

    I love that bumpersticker on the back of the RV: “We’re spending our kids’ inheritance!” Good for the kids!

    LikeLike


  117. on April 13, 2009 at 11:38 am Momus

    Default User: wildebeest are herbivores.

    LikeLike


  118. on April 13, 2009 at 11:39 am benjack

    Here’s a link to the chinese panda bear story:

    http://community.adn.com/adn/node/134806

    LikeLike


  119. on April 13, 2009 at 11:39 am PA

    … and (d) upper middle class ennui hypothesis too.

    Not sure what other fish there be in that thare pond.

    LikeLike


  120. on April 13, 2009 at 11:41 am dougjnn

    Can anyone think of an example of any Euro origin person doing stuff like this woman above, the Grizzly man, or the trust fund kid holing up in Denali park in a bus with a big bag or rice, who WASN’T a moonbat leftie?

    Any examples at all?

    LikeLike


  121. on April 13, 2009 at 11:43 am PA

    I love that bumpersticker on the back of the RV: “We’re spending our kids’ inheritance!” Good for the kids!

    Heh, love that one. The kids don’t need your stinkin’ money. Teach your son game and your daughter to be a good girl, teach them both about God, and that’s all they need.

    That way at 17 they won’f feel left out of the “my parents are such jerks” conversations and at 35 they won’t be left out of the “I had it tough as a kid” cionversations.

    And your No. 1 job — to keep them from becomnig Lefties — will be that much easier.

    LikeLike


  122. on April 13, 2009 at 11:46 am dougjnn

    PA

    Aside from the mental illness explanation, the hypotheses of whites’ (a) proclivities toward curiosity/exploration, (b) SWPL status game escalation, and (c) fondness for animals were thrown out there.

    add:

    (d) moonbat leftism of the “love the world and it will love you back” variety.

    LikeLike


  123. on April 13, 2009 at 11:47 am PA

    Doug, that goes under (c) SWPL status game escalation.

    LikeLike


  124. on April 13, 2009 at 11:48 am Obsidian

    PA,
    I didn’t say your or anyone else’s hypotheses were unsatisfactory; what I said was that I was interested in probing a very interesting question further. That’s it.

    Also, I did say that what you and Pete suggested could indeed be relevant and true; I just wanted to probe the question further.

    Doug brings in an interesting angle to the question, that of political orientation. I’ve always been of the view that there’s a reason why avoid openly talking about politics and religion in social settings, because they stand as so much more than merely going through the motions or pulling a lever; there are proxies, signs, tells, of how one views and by extension, interacts with the world. And that has massive implications. People know this. And hence why they tend to avoid open discussion of such things.

    Having said that though, nit must be noted, that the vast nmajority of Black Americans vote Democrat. Same deal for Hispanics, Asians and so on. Yet its hard to find many instances of any of them doing what the German Whitw Lady, Grizzly Man or Into The Wild Guy did.

    Comments?

    O

    LikeLike


  125. on April 13, 2009 at 11:51 am PA

    Fair enough Obsidian, but I am out of ideas as to what else could account for the animal encounters, assuming it in fact is a white thing.

    LikeLike


  126. on April 13, 2009 at 11:57 am Default User

    Momus

    Default User: wildebeest are herbivores.

    Thanks.

    I just liked the sound of “wildebeest.” Serves me right from trying to be Swippley (SWPL) in my choice of words.

    LikeLike


  127. on April 13, 2009 at 11:57 am dougjnn

    Obsidian —

    the vast nmajority of Black Americans vote Democrat. Same deal for Hispanics, Asians and so on.

    I didn’t talk about democrats or all lefties. I talked about a certain kind of leftism, moonbat leftism, of the “love the world and it will love you back” variety. Taking that to utter extremes in other words.

    Blacks, Hispanics and Asians vote Democrat in large percentages for self interested reasons.

    Affluent whites vote Democrat, for the most part, for quasi religious, or moral, or identity politics reasons, or at least white men do. Affluent single white women have some self interest reasons as well, mainly they think abortion rights at this stage.

    LikeLike


  128. on April 13, 2009 at 12:04 pm Obsidian

    PA,
    As OMW noted, this has been in part an interesting exercise in what happens when some of the very same reasoning that’s seen in this forum often, is turned around. Here we have a phenomenon that apparently involves a particular group of people more than others, and the orginal subject of ridicule and scorn – the Fat Lady – suddenly became a cause celeb when someone, me, dared to note the obvious in these type of scenarios.

    Did I ever tell you that I was a straight A student in Psychology?😉

    So often, the”race realists” purport to be objective in their “studies” when in truth, they are looking for something to back up their already preconceived notions. That’s fine, of course, until someone gets the hang of what they’re doing and starts beating them at their own game. Or at least starts keeping pace.

    Hope you get my point here.

    O

    LikeLike


  129. on April 13, 2009 at 12:07 pm omw

    That, and the New Left gives a lot of pretty plum jobs to the more mediocre members of our upper-middle class.

    LikeLike


  130. on April 13, 2009 at 12:11 pm omw

    oops, this in response to Doug. I’m thinking, public schools, non-profit orgs, various quasi-governmental corporate tentacles (Diversity Managers, etc.)

    Onliest people being left out of entirely out of that pie anymore are Copenhagen chewers in Oklahoma, far as I can tell. And it’s not like those folks have ever been exceedingly wealthy in the first place.

    LikeLike


  131. on April 13, 2009 at 12:11 pm dougjnn

    OMW

    That, and the New Left gives a lot of pretty plum jobs to the more mediocre members of our upper-middle class.

    True that. Especially for women. At the higher end think of all those cushy foundation jobs — which are a real plumb for marriage minded Ivys and similar.

    LikeLike


  132. on April 13, 2009 at 12:12 pm Obsidian

    Hey Doug,
    Duly noted, and I agree, there *is* a quasi-religious ferver on the Left; GK Chesterton’s thoughts come to mind on these matters.

    I think you may onto something about the political orientation of those involved with such incidents, Doug. Kinda makes sense, and could be part of the profile we’d be looking for.

    Hmm…

    As for the self-interests of the groups you mentioned, in most cases they are easily challenged provided one knows the lay of the land and how to parry and thrust so to speak. For example, as a Black Conservative, I’ve been able to forcibly shutdown every Black Liberal I’ve ever faced in a debate. Every. Single. One. Of. Them.

    Same deal with Feminists, and Gay Activists when it comes to Gay Marriage. As I say, its just that people don’t think things through properly, which means they can’t corrctly articulate their positions, nor can they arrive at the proper conclusions.

    But I suppose, that’s another discussion…

    O

    LikeLike


  133. on April 13, 2009 at 12:18 pm omw

    oh, and universities. God, how can one forget universities?

    Still, I’ve seen the four-room farmhouse my great-grandparents inhabited, built on a foundation of nothing but their own labor. They raised four kids in that place.

    Right-wing as it comes. God’nGuns. Hellfire and Heaven!

    Do I actually want to live in that shack, twenty miles from the nearest neighbor? No, I do not.

    So I suppose if the price of running water and internet access is a little bit of irritating hypocritical posturing on the part of my social betters, bring on the posturing.

    LikeLike


  134. on April 13, 2009 at 12:22 pm Obsidian

    As for primates and Gorillas in the Mist and all that, its my understanding that the most fearsome primates are chimps, not gorillas. Mainly due to their highly unpredictable natures, and the fact that they’re much stronger than their smaller statures would suggest.

    The remake of the Planet of The Apes takes this into account; if you’ve seen the 1968 orginal, the leader of the Apes was a gorilla. In the Tim Burton remake, the leader of the apes is Thade, a chimp.

    O

    LikeLike


  135. on April 13, 2009 at 12:23 pm omw

    Hey, Obsidian, what IS your argument about gay marriage?

    Personally, I’ve got an ominous sense that it’s a real bad idea, but an ominous sense does not a good argument make.

    LikeLike


  136. on April 13, 2009 at 12:40 pm Obsidian

    OMW,
    My position is that the entire Gay Marriage debate is extremely flawed, for a host of reasons. First, if there is to be any resolution at all, it should and must be so on the state level, by either the legislatures or direct ballot by the People. The feds and definitely the courts, should stay out of it. Though in principle I’m against Gay Marriage, I can live with it if the People of any given state clearly vote in favor of it.

    To the wider question, what we’ve lost sight of the issue, is the original purpose of Marriage itself, which was to see to it that the next generation comes about in an orderly fashion. History and even in our time now, clearly shows us that society is best served when kids come about in an ordered arrangement called marriage. Is it perfect, no. Is it without problems, no. Is it the end all be all, no. But over the long arc of history, with all manner of arrangements tried, marriage, between one man and one woman, has proven to work best. Polygamous marriages *can* work well, but they present more problems than the one woman/one man kind, so for more practical purposes, I would tend to favor that model.

    The next thing I would tackle is the grossly false logic of many gay activists and (Black) liberals, attempting to make an equivalency argument between being Black and being Gay, or between the Loving decision and th current Gay Marriage debate. Its false because there is no real comparison to be made between the circumstances of the two groups, nor of the circumstances surrounding marriage in either case.

    Another major area I’d challenge Gay activists on this score is the fact that they DO want to officially change the definition of marriage while not admitting to this, which is patently intellectually dishonest; moreover, the fact that they refuse to speak to what would happen were Gay Marriage were widely instituted reveals their motivations-for example, when asked how they would feel about making Polygamy legal, or sister-brother/mother-son/father-daughter marriage legal, they refuse to takeup these very real possibilities; they could possibly be discriminated against and many of their number would argue much moreso than Gays. Why no concern for them?

    These are just a few of the reasons why I say the current debate is flawed and appears to be working in the Gay activists’ favor. But as we’ve seen so many times before, stuff built on weak arguments comes crashing down sooner or later, under their own weight.

    Holla back

    O

    LikeLike


  137. on April 13, 2009 at 12:51 pm omw

    Thanks, O. Don’t want to turn the thread into a discussion of gay marriage, but was interested in your thoughts on the matter.

    LikeLike


  138. on April 13, 2009 at 1:09 pm Obsidian

    You’re most welcme OMW-however, I think the current round of Gay Marriage debate just might be a bit more far reaching than we may realize. What effect will it have on say, Game, and by wider extension, male/female relationships? For example, according to the NIH, there are “officially” more lesbians than gay men, and we already know, from studies like the recent one posted in the NYT on Female Sexuality, that its a bit more fluid and not as hardwired as Male Sexuality. So it means that Women may be more inclined to pursue say, lesbian relationships than in the past, since the potential for scandal (Notes on a Scandal, anyone? LOL) would be lessened in a post Gay Marriage environment.

    Andrew Hacker examines this to some extent in his book Mismatch and is what I would consider essential reading for those of us who are interested in how that animal called Human gets on with each other in the most important of ways.

    O

    LikeLike


  139. on April 13, 2009 at 2:17 pm Ready salted

    Obsidian

    it appears, by all accounts, to be only White folks who regularly do this

    foxnews
    Marjan the lion
    Tigers maul tourist
    Gu Gu the panda
    Suicide
    london zoo

    The last one is a Nigerian man.

    So why you think it’s a white thing I don’t know. A US Centric media ? A racist press not bothering to report non white zoo deaths? A reverse-racist press covering up non-white zoo deaths as it makes minorities look bad? US minorities not having enough money to visit the zoo?
    A more interesting question is why black and white have such drastically different suicide rates.

    LikeLike


  140. on April 13, 2009 at 2:18 pm Firepower

    i lmsao when i saw the vid of the fat kraut bitch getting instant weight reduction.

    i wish to fuck Darwinism made a return for such fucking morons.

    What’s bad, is the headlines shout “woman ATTACKED by bear” when it should read

    “fat bitch ATTACKS bear’s sanctuary”

    hope she bleeds out and donates her corneas.

    Peace,
    amen

    LikeLike


  141. on April 13, 2009 at 2:20 pm Obsidian

    Ready Salted,
    Good points, but again, *context* is key. Are these cases comparable to Grizzly Man? Into The Wild? Etc? If so, fair enough. If not…

    As for the suicide rates, excellent question. Black Men by and large don’t kill themselves the way White Men do. Why? Again, excellent question!

    Any theories?

    O

    LikeLike


  142. on April 13, 2009 at 3:07 pm Firepower

    bc black men are happy to fuck fat white women lol

    LikeLike


  143. on April 13, 2009 at 3:09 pm Obsidian

    Well, compared to that or getting no pussy at all, that certainly would make sense, lol

    O

    LikeLike


  144. on April 13, 2009 at 4:54 pm Tupac Chopra

    David Alexander should read that Devlin article anon posted.

    LikeLike


  145. on April 13, 2009 at 5:10 pm lurker

    O, good point about black men not killing themselves in ways like this.

    Interestingly, this also gives the lie to the idea that suicide bombers are drawn from the poor. If that were true, race riots would have degenerated into self-explosions long ago.

    No, suicide bombers come from either wealthy/upper middle class or the mentally retarded. Bin Laden is a very bored wealthy man who had nothing left to accomplish in the world and turned to nihilistic religious impulses to give him a sense of purpose. Many hijackers have been successful/smart men (doctors/engineers) who sought a deeper fulfillment than their success got them.

    Of course, the mentally retarded are easy to sway as well. Many remains have been found to be those of persons with an extra chromosome or two.

    This woman reminds me of an extremist SWPL Gaia-worshipping nut, but then again, that is soleley from the meager news story. She quite possibly could have fallen in or else is bi-polar/manic.

    I always like it when the SWPLers get shopwn the error of their idiotic cults, so I will pretend that is what happened here.

    Polar bears are vicious fucks. They are the most vicious animals on the planet. They hunt for fun.

    LikeLike


  146. on April 13, 2009 at 5:47 pm PA

    Obsidian — Well, compared to that [fucking fatties] or getting no pussy at all, that [suicide] certainly would make sense, lol

    Nah, I’d rather commit suicide than bang a fat chick.😉

    LikeLike


  147. on April 13, 2009 at 5:53 pm Willard Libby

    Interesting that all the White men focus on how fat the woman is and condemn her for it.

    I’ll guarantee you plenty of black guys think she’s a “fine ass White woman”. LOL.

    They might not admit it but they’re feeling it.

    LikeLike


  148. on April 13, 2009 at 6:24 pm Shit Test

    You are shit, roissy.

    LikeLike


  149. on April 13, 2009 at 6:25 pm Hmmm

    hmmmmm

    LikeLike


  150. on April 13, 2009 at 6:35 pm benjack

    “Here we have a phenomenon that apparently involves a particular group of people more than others, and the orginal subject of ridicule and scorn – the Fat Lady – suddenly became a cause celeb when someone, me, dared to note the obvious in these type of scenarios.”

    Are you talking about Hillary Clinton after Obama started gaining on her?? 😀

    LikeLike


  151. on April 13, 2009 at 6:38 pm chic noir

    Tell them Willard cause you would surely hit if given the chance.

    LikeLike


  152. on April 13, 2009 at 6:54 pm Fabian

    But, it still doesn’t account for the fact that we have Grizzly Man, Into The Wild and the like. All White, too. We see this again and again, and unless you’re arguing for a religious angle being involved in all these cases, then I would say its one that seems to be lost on Peoples of Color. There has to be something in the White Psyche that speaks to this tendency; even in movies, White folks have to engage what appears to be extremely dangerous aliens (Alien, anyone?) in order to “study it”. Seems like other folk can study the same creatures from a comfortable distance.

    So again, the question remains: wassup with White folks doing this kind of stuff? What’s that all about?

    Comments?

    It’s very simple. No guts, no glory. People who want to discover things take big chances. People who don’t, don’t.

    Grizzly Man had some emotional issues to be sure. But the guy survived in the heart of grizzly country living in a tent for 13 summers. Not bad, if you ask me.

    That being said, all you cruel bastards laughing at this woman are sad. She’s obviously mentally ill, people. Even I can have a heart occasionally.

    LikeLike


  153. on April 13, 2009 at 7:28 pm jackson

    Fabian,

    Do you know what’s wrong with our society? Fucking people are so far removed from reality, they don’t even know what a fucking bear does.

    No heart, here.

    LikeLike


  154. on April 13, 2009 at 7:30 pm jackson

    Obsidian,

    White people have been wealthy for a long time. They have been insulated from the world and had time to develop stupid fashions and pathologies.

    LikeLike


  155. on April 13, 2009 at 7:32 pm PA

    White people have been wealthy for a long time.

    Yeah, like that woman in Ohio who cleaned my hotel room.

    LikeLike


  156. on April 13, 2009 at 7:36 pm Willard Libby

    Obsidian – Look who’s dodging and twisting in the wind now, eh? LOL! I’m asking you (and anyone else brave enough to actually tackle the question as asked): WHAT IS UP WITH WHITE FOLKS who do the kinds of things noted above? Why do they do this, when to most right thinking people, it’s highly risky, if not life threatening, behavior? Why? And why is it other races don’t seem to engage in this as much? Asians, for example, don’t do that anywhere near as much as Whites do. I mention them because for many Whites they’re an acceptable White alternative.

    Again: comments?

    To start with I will say that White people who engage in high risk taking behavior are in a minority. It takes a whole truck load of guts to do this stuff whether it is pointless crazy stuff or necessary dangerous behavior.

    Most people in all races are “play it safe” type people.

    Why White people? My theory is that within the White racial population there might be more genes for high risk/fearless/reckless behavior than in other races. I think this might be behind that fact that White people have been the great innovators in modern global civilization when it comes to making changes in the areas that require great physical and mental courage. Aviation, aerospace and expanding the frontiers of human achievement. I include in that the creation of the modern scientific/rational world view and all of the science and engineering that goes with it. It took a lot of courage to fight off traditional religion, myth, culture and superstition to do that and it is almost completely a White phenomenon, despite the many White people who have yet to get with it.

    So I think these genes will contribute to all sorts of risky/reckless/fearless behavior and it depends on intelligence and discipline whether this turns out to have innovative results or is disastrous.

    Why not Asians? Well, the negative stereotype there is that Asians are cowards. They might have some smarts but no guts. Not saying that’s true but the notion of Asian docility might be involved here.

    As for black risk taking remember blacks disproportionately seem to be involved in risky sexual behavior despite the well known risk of AIDS. The majority of new AIDS cases in America are overwhelmingly in the black community despite blacks only being 12% of the country. In Washington DC among the black gay male population AIDS is rampant.

    Is this because blacks choose to be involved in this risky, life threatening behavior or are they too stupid to know better?

    This is a huge issue in the black community, gay or straight. There is an acceptable alternative and it’s called celibacy, monogamy or using a condom. It can be a life or death choice.

    So that’s my working theory for these types of seemingly unique White race based behaviors. Some group of genes acting to contribute to behavior that is bold, daring and courageous. Then, depending on the presence of other genes, differing levels of intelligence and discipline it will lead to different expressions of bold/crazy/daring/reckless behavior.

    When mixed with a high IQ it leads to this:

    When mixed with an average IQ it leads to this:

    And this:

    And this:

    And this!!!

    When mixed with a low IQ it leads to this:

    And whatever the IQ when it’s mixed with mental illness it leads to a woman throwing herself into a polar bear enclosure.

    It must be related to some genes for fearless/reckless/courageous behavior. Sometimes this leads to great innovation in the human condition, other times it leads to what is technically know as “Deep DooDoo”. White folks just have more of these genes.

    Human civilization needs crazy risk takers because without them we’d all still be living in grass huts.

    And some people are still living in grass huts and that’s not only because they are stupid.

    It’s because they are cowards, surrounded by cowards.

    LikeLike


  157. on April 13, 2009 at 9:13 pm Tarl

    Well, the negative stereotype there is that Asians are cowards. They might have some smarts but no guts.

    American white boys who fought the Filipinos, the Japanese, the Koreans, the Chinese, and the Vietnamese might differ with that assessment.

    LikeLike


  158. on April 13, 2009 at 9:18 pm Tarl

    So here is a stupid SWPL affectation – pretend you’re a Ugandan woman for, like, five whole minutes (then it’s off to brunch):

    On a sunny Sunday afternoon earlier this month, about a dozen Bethany Community Church members knelt by the shores of Green Lake, filling 5-gallon jugs with water and carrying them part way around the lake.

    It was a way to experience, at least for a few minutes, the heavy burden borne by women and children in Uganda who sometimes walk for miles each day to get water for drinking, cooking and washing.

    The idea for the project came from a church member. The idea to tie it to Easter came from Dahlstrom. He had thought of doing the project during Lent because a large part of it is challenging church members to give up something in order to live simpler.

    Yeah, live simpler, but not for very long, because living simply really sucks. Now, these SWPL types did not gain as much status from their small portion of suffering as did the guy who tried to live with the grizzlies, but the principle is the same.

    LikeLike


  159. on April 13, 2009 at 10:57 pm agnostic

    Hey polar bear — pick on a walrus your own size.

    LikeLike


  160. on April 14, 2009 at 12:43 am joel

    White people are very stupid in many ways. Who but white people worry about stopping climate change? Who but white people give away their countries? White people have been prosperous for a couple of generations now. That leads to a very distorted outlook on life. Like, they are dying out themselves rapidly, but are worried about some silly lizard or frog going extinct.

    Well, I am not worried. The Next Ice Age will straighten things out. Think about mile high ice sheets covering NY City. Not much low hanging fruit. Meanwhile, party on, Dude. Things are much better than we think.

    I wonder how those mile high ice sheets will affect game? Probably not much!

    LikeLike


  161. on April 14, 2009 at 12:47 am Sara I

    I have to agree with those who say only a white person would do something that crazy.

    LikeLike


  162. on April 14, 2009 at 3:30 am Momus

    Good size triceps on that bear.

    LikeLike


  163. on April 14, 2009 at 5:18 am CJ

    That bear isn’t trying to eat her. It’s just telling her to get the hell away. If those bears had actually wanted to eat her, she’d be in their stomachs now.

    BTW, those zoo employees did a great job of distracting the bears until Fraulein Widebody Airhead finally crawled out of there.

    LikeLike


  164. on April 14, 2009 at 7:47 am rob

    Why whites do crazy nature stuff?

    The more primitive races are part of nature. Antelopes don’t love lions. Neither do blacks. Whites think elephants and monkeys are interesting features of nature. But for negroes they’re fearsome competition.

    LikeLike


  165. on April 14, 2009 at 9:21 am Obsidian

    Yea, I’ve always noticed that familiar theme in movies, especially of the sci-fi/horror kind; they’ll be this ominous state of affairs around which a monster or group of monsters is at the middle, like the Alien(s) series, and the White folks always seem bent of “studying it”, even though the darned thing’s been tearing your fellow homie’s apart, etc. That’s always fascinated me and I’ve always wondered what was at work in the White Psyche that leads to that. Note how in other forms of cinema around the world, like Bollywood and Nollywood, Indians and Africans don’t seem to be all that interested in messing with grusome extraterristrial creatures.

    Perhaps Whiskey has some thoughts on this, as he’s something of a movie buff?

    O

    LikeLike


  166. on April 14, 2009 at 9:29 am PA

    As far as “studying it,” it might have to do with a need to figure out how the monster or animal works in order to know how to fight it later.

    For example, when dealing with crocodiles, it’s not always good to just avoid them. Especially when the crocodiles have a habit of sneaking up on women washing clothes in teh lake. So “studying” the crocodile gives you an ability to predict its feeding time, knowldedge of how it strikes, etc.

    Ironically, I recently watched a nature documentary in which a French team of biologists went down to Uganda to teach Ugandans how to capture and neutralize man-eating crocodiles!

    Because the Europeans studied the croc, they knew how to approach it, safely mount it, tie its snout, and dispatch it. Prior to getting schooled by the Europeans, the Ugandans were resigned to having an occasional child or fisherman shacned by the reptile every few days.

    LikeLike


  167. on April 14, 2009 at 9:52 am Obsidian

    PA,
    Of course you realize, just next door over in Kenya, that there are tribes of African Bushmen who specialize in hunting lions only with spears and the like, right? Do you honestly think Africans couldn’t make it w/o White folks teaching them how to live in the wild? They been doing alright in that regard for thousands of years, so, we have to keep things in perspective.

    Anyway, going back to White folk in the movies, one of my favorite genres is Sci-Fi, but not for the obvious reasons; to me, its a compelling commentary of how White folks see themselves in the future. And, not surprisingly, other folk don’t feature as prominently, if at all, in said future.

    I don’t know if you’ve ever seen it, but years ago in the early days of CGI movies like Toy Story, there was this flick called Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within. I was visiting family for Thanksgiving, and chillin on the couch with my nephew Khalil, who was about 7 or 8 at the time or so.
    The movie, while made for kids, was of the scifi bent: a race of the ghosts of alien warriors comes to Earth for some reason, and the human race has to sort it all out.

    Anyway, there’s this scene where Earth is being overrun by the alien ghosts, and the humans have to get outta Dodge. The team consists of he blonde haired GI Joe type, a bald White older scientist type, a few other White figures, and finally the Noble Negro-a Black Sergeant (note how Black guys are almost always NCOs) who valiantly fights off the encroaching, overwhelming onslaught of the alien ghosts, since he just happens to get injured, and decides to sacrifice himself to save the “rest” of humanity. That buys the rest of the team time 2 get on the spaceship and blastoff into space.

    After that sequence, my nephew looked up at me and said, Uncle, can I ask you a question?

    Sure, I said to my nephew. What’s on your mind?

    *WHY DOES THE BLACK GUY ALWAYS HAVE TO DIE?*

    That was one of the few times in my life that I was stunned and speechless for a few minutes.

    We had a powerful discussion about how Black kids see these kinds of things.

    Holla back

    O

    LikeLike


  168. on April 14, 2009 at 10:02 am PA

    Do you honestly think Africans couldn’t make it w/o White folks teaching them how to live in the wild?

    I don’t know enough about Africans and their coexistance with local wildlife t ohave a meaningful opinion. I just know that crocodile documentary that showed Ugandans periodically letting a kid or a fisherman get snatched by a croc until the French taught them how to capture and dispatch the reptile.

    its a compelling commentary of how White folks see themselves in the future.

    Kid entertainment is best when it avoids the distractions of showing people of other races.

    We had a powerful discussion about how Black kids see these kinds of things.

    Welcome to my world.

    24/7 transmission of commericals with goofy white guys getting shown up by smarter and cooler black guys.

    LikeLike


  169. on April 14, 2009 at 10:18 am Default User

    Obsidian

    *WHY DOES THE BLACK GUY ALWAYS HAVE TO DIE?*

    Hey, the “cocky black chauffer” (a version of the “noble negro?”) in Die Hard survived. He even got the last line.

    LikeLike


  170. on April 14, 2009 at 10:28 am Obsidian

    PA,
    I’m not certain about this, but I have a theory wrt crocs etc-it’s been my experience, that Black folk on a whole aren’t particularly interested in aquatic things. That may sound utterly simplistic, but I tell you, if you look around you’ll find a similar result. And that may have something to do with what you saw on the tube recently. Just a thought.

    As for your other comment about small kids not being bogged down by seeing other groups, why not? Isn’t the reality of the world, that its made up of all kinds of people? In fact that’s what made me such a fan of Star Trek as a kid growing up, *because* it had so many different races of folk. It would have been very boring if all there was, was Captain Kirk (btw, there’s a “new” Star Trek about the drop next month, directed by JJ Abrams. It looks slick, but the titular roles, Kirk and Spock, look like college kids, not more mature spacefarers. Hmm). So, I think its very important to expose kids early on to the realities of our world. But then maybe most Whites can afford to live in a bubble.

    Another fave genre of mine is the Westerns. LOVE WESTERNS. The Spaghetti Westerns of Clint Eastwood, Young Guns, all the flicks made about Wyatt Earp, you name it. But here’s the thing:

    There were rarely, if ever, Black folks prominently featured. And Westerns have been around for a very long time. One has to wonder why, given the fact that one in every three Cowboys were Black. Hmm.

    Ever seen Posse? Good flick.

    Yippee kayay…

    O

    LikeLike


  171. on April 14, 2009 at 10:41 am PA

    Hey O, so you’re sayng that black folk are like cats, don’t like water?😉

    I liked black characters in 80s TV and movies. They were usually suave, often with that jheri curl thing that I thought was cool. Examples are the best-buddy black character on TV shows.

    There was none of that tension thing that started showing up in the early 90s. Today, it’s impossible to see a black character that isn’t in one way or another pointedly superior in that obnoxious race-baiting (on the part of the media producers) way the the white character(s).

    Things were just more laid back up until the PC explosion that came in with the 1990s. For example, WTF is it with Friends or Seinfeld shows, which were almost 100% devoid of black characters, except in an occasional episode tha tshowed some obnoxious black kid kicking Ross Geller and then grinning victoriously. Something the kid shoudl have been slapped for!

    Or a nasty black woman giving a thunderous lecture on somethign to George Costanza.

    LikeLike


  172. on April 14, 2009 at 10:54 am Obsidian

    PA,
    LOL, yea, I guess you could say something like that. Afterall, you’re not likely to find many Olympic level swimmers and divers who are Black, and believe me we know what swimming pools look like. We just not terribly interested in such things for some reason.

    As for Friends and Seinfeld, and I’ve personally enjoyed the latter more than the former, I think both shows are a fascinating insight into the White Psyche. Here we have two shows set in a city where its very hard to make it thru your day w/o having run accross at least a handful of Black folk, yet one can count on perhaps one hand, of all the episodes of both shows, the number of Black folk who appear. I think that’s quite a profound commentary myself.
    As for the “obnoxious” (read, arrogant, chip on the shoulder, angry) Black, well, we have to keep in mind that even now, most show and movie writers are White, and that plays a role. They may be using the Black figures to drive home a point about the show on a whole, or about a particular character on the show, or both. This makes sense, since so often Black folk themes and issues are often used by Whites as a kind of buffer in some cases and a cudgel in others, with which to whup up on other White folk. As American as Apple Pie.🙂

    The Jheri curl thing was hilarious, and could never see how so many Black folk went for that one, LOL.

    As for Black roles, im for all of it because there are all types in Black America. So there’s room for the Cosby Show, and there’s room for Nino Brown, too.

    O

    LikeLike


  173. on April 14, 2009 at 11:08 am PA

    we have two shows set in a city where its very hard to make it thru your day w/o having run accross at least a handful of Black folk,

    In a way that’s a reflection of reality in the sense that people tend to socialize within their own race.

    But regardless, you gotta love Jackie Chiles in Seinfeld. An honets-to-goodness hard working ambulance chaser lawyer. My favorite:

    He’s on the cusp of getting Kramer a huge settlement from a tobacco company. They’re riding in a cab, and Kramer says:

    Kramer: “I had a pow-wowwith the tobacco executives this morning.”

    Chiles, in that hurried way of his: “A pow-wow? who told you to have a pow-wow?!”

    Kramer proudly points to a billboard that features him in a Marlboro Man role… that being the settlement he accepted without his lawyer’s permission. No money.

    Chiles groans: “of my many hoooomiliations, this is the most public one yet!”

    LikeLike


  174. on April 14, 2009 at 11:17 am Obsidian

    PA,
    Very interesting observation, Alvin Poussaint would be pleased.🙂 I think it can be seen several ways: one which is the way you suggested, but the other being just how far Whites especially, because other races don’t seem to go to this extent, go to avoid other people of Color, and particularly Black folks, on ANY level. Even in terms of passerby. If you study Woody Allen films, Seinfeld and Friends, one is hardpressed to even see Black folk especially, and other people of color more generally, even in the background. I say it all, when you add it up-Westerns, SciFi, Sitcoms, and the like, all serves as a fascinating insight into what I call the White Psyche, which on some levels is delusional, in that it seems to have trouble handling and accepting the fact that other people exist, meaningfully, in the world.

    Comments?

    O

    LikeLike


  175. on April 14, 2009 at 11:44 am Firepower

    i reiterate my comments re chic noir – girly – forbear!

    LikeLike


  176. on April 14, 2009 at 12:14 pm Obsidian

    Just found Willard’s comments, which was a mouthful. Need to address them right quick.

    First off, I think what you said about genes, risk taking and the like makes a lot of sense. I don’t really have much to add or critique in that regard.
    Having said that though, the way you try to twist the discussion into a kind of bashing Black folk is kinda standard operating procedure for you, plus its irrelevant; so what if the HIV/AIDS infection is high in DC? What does that have to do with Grizzly Man, Into The Wild and the Fat White Lady? Nothing from where I sit, it’s just yet another case of Willard needing to feed his psyche’s need to putatively dump on Black folks.

    Now, having said that, I don’t think anyone could say w/a straight face that the Filipinos, Samurai Japanese and the like are “cowards”. Remember Willard, arguably thee best treatise ever written on military strategy and application was written by an Asian, The Art of War.

    As for your comments regarding Black folks…

    Yup, generally speaking, its true: Black like to make whoppie, and tends to do it moreso than the average White. Moreover, I can tel you that the vast majority of Black Men do not like using condoms. Can’t feel anything, its like eating a cheesetak w/a surgical glove over your tongue. What’s the point?

    Now, having said that, yes, the risk for STDs are higher in light of the aforementioned-and-are you listening Willard-Black folk tend to be more polyamorous than Whites on average, hence, one of the major reasons why the HIV/AIDS rate is so much higher. Now we can go off into all manner of moralistic arguments and the like, fine, but I’m simply sayin.

    As for the Downlow issue in the hood, it’s there, but I honestly don’t think it’s as big as it actually is. I think a bit of it is hype. I also think all the handwringing done on behalf of Black Women is in a way kinda of a smokescreen to cover the fact that lots of Black Women don’t really have that big a problem having sex w/the same Man, under the right conditions, of course. This is more common than in the White community for a number of reasons, and not for the ones you might think-one of them being, that there are more Alphas among Black Males than they are among White ones. And Women of all races like offer herself up to Alphas.

    Anyway, good points. See what happens when you try?😉

    O

    LikeLike


  177. on April 14, 2009 at 12:49 pm Willard Libby

    Obsidian – Note how in other forms of cinema around the world, like Bollywood and Nollywood, Indians and Africans don’t seem to be all that interested in messing with grusome extraterristrial creatures.

    Maybe that’s because White people are becoming increasingly naturalistic in their worldview and are less likely to believe in superstitions and religious mythology so they have to invent biological monsters to focus on. Religion and myth are still part of the White world but it’s weakening in comparison to the black and brown world.

    Maybe Indians and Africans still believe in spooks and spirits that haunt their imaginations so they don’t need to invent an imaginary extraterrestrial civilization to satisfy this psychic need.

    Default User – Obsidian – *WHY DOES THE BLACK GUY ALWAYS HAVE TO DIE?*

    Hey, the “cocky black chauffer” (a version of the “noble negro?”) in Die Hard survived. He even got the last line.

    Is Die Hard the movie that ends with the black guy killing the very White and very blond Alexander Godinov?

    PA – Examples are the best-buddy black character on TV shows.

    Why do so many movies and TV shows have to give the White man a black buddy/partner or friend. White men out number black males in America about 7 to 1 so what’s with this 50/50 White man/black guy routine?

    They just don’t want the blacks to feel left out?

    Obsidian – As for Friends and Seinfeld, and I’ve personally enjoyed the latter more than the former, I think both shows are a fascinating insight into the White Psyche.

    Here’s a pretty good example of the White Psyche and Seinfeld. Funny but also very deep.

    A deeper issue might be what is it about the black psyche that fears being excluded from the attention of the White Psyche. Why do so many blacks crave the attention and acceptance of White folks? Why do so many blacks feel deeply threatened and insecure when they see White folks in TV/movies socializing WITHOUT the presence of blacks?

    If somebody black made a movie about their experiences and didn’t include White people the fact is most White folks wouldn’t care. They’d just say that’s for blacks and move on.

    The black psyche can’t do that. The black psyche is wounded and threatened by exclusion from the White Psyche. Why is that?

    It probably gets back to the fact that at one time blacks were the property of White folks. They were owned, named and numbered by the White Man and this has left a fundamental flaw in the black psyche.

    As I’ve said before if you mix this with the black boy’s own Oedipal Complex you will be better able to understand the black male obsession with the White Woman and his desperate need for her attention and sexual acceptance.

    I think on another level many White people are just bored with the mediocrity of most people of all races. That’s why they become fascinated with real or imaginary creatures and why they want “to boldly go where no man has gone before”. Either in science or science fiction.

    Humans of any race or culture are a pretty dull and similar lot despite external differences.

    LikeLike


  178. on April 14, 2009 at 1:28 pm Willard Libby

    Obsidian – Having said that though, the way you try to twist the discussion into a kind of bashing Black folk is kinda standard operating procedure for you, plus its irrelevant; so what if the HIV/AIDS infection is high in DC?

    It seems like standard operating procedure for you to sneak around on here talking abut Game and then to pull race out of your ass and then when someone decides to honestly deal with race back at you you decide to play Threatened, Insecure Black Man.

    YOU brought race into the discussion about the woman in the polar bear enclosure. YOU asked “What’s up with White folks” and risky behavior. Now listen up, you don’t get to come on here and make an issue of White Folks without some folks turning it around on you and your people. Got it?

    Now here’s a question for you – Which is a more common risky, life threatening behavior – White folks hanging out with bears or black folks engaging in sexual behavior THAT IS KNOWN TO ALL INTELLIGENT PEOPLE AS LEADING TO THE SPREAD OF AIDS?

    You really shouldn’t need much time on this one.

    What does that have to do with Grizzly Man, Into The Wild and the Fat White Lady? Nothing from where I sit, it’s just yet another case of Willard needing to feed his psyche’s need to putatively dump on Black folks.

    Right. Your black male psyche is delusional. You string together unrelated and extremely rare examples of risky behavior by a small number of White people. You then ask What’s up with White folks? I then ask you about far more common risky behavior by blacks and you become threatened and defensive.

    You chose to bring up race and I chose to bring it back into your face. Sounds fair to me.

    Now, having said that, I don’t think anyone could say w/a straight face that the Filipinos, Samurai Japanese and the like are “cowards”. Remember Willard, arguably thee best treatise ever written on military strategy and application was written by an Asian, The Art of War.

    I never said ALL ASIANS are cowards. I’m sure the White men in history who slaughtered millions of Filipinos, Japanese, Chinese and Koreans will testify that there are plenty of courageous warriors among Asians.

    But it’s silly to think that Samurai are more typical of Asian males than the average Japanese peasant who grovelled in fear in the face of these men.

    The stereotype of Asian docility might have some truth to it despite the reality of Asian warriors, samurai or Bruce Lee movies. We all have heard about Asian males being less capable of Game in relation to women. I don’t know if that is true but again it might be related to a kind of Asian docility.

    I don’t think that you could argue that just because Asia has a huge population that therefore Asian males must have great Game. We all know Asian males are capable of making babies.

    The issued YOU raised was why more White risk taking behavior and not Asian. You could also ask why did forms of democracy, capitalism and individualism rise among White folks but not Asians.

    There may be again genes for “reckless individualism” that predominate among White folks more than Asians. Maybe White folks have more genes for bold, daring, risky, reckless behavior COMBINED with more genes for individualism. Maybe.

    As for the Downlow issue in the hood, it’s there, but I honestly don’t think it’s as big as it actually is. I think a bit of it is hype.

    That’s because as a black male you are disturbed by the image of the black male as being something other than an Alpha heterosexual. I think there is a lot of denial in the black community about this issue.

    Sorry it aint the Republicans, the Klan or the CIA fuckin around in the black community spreading HIV.

    We all know who’s responsible for this risky, reckless behavior.

    And it aint Whitey and his Grizzly lovin, Polar bear hugging ways.

    LikeLike


  179. on April 14, 2009 at 1:47 pm Obsidian

    Ahh. I see Willard’s Id Monster is alive and well. Let’s dive right in.

    India is and has been for thousands of years, overwhelmingly Hindu, which focus on a polytheistic view of God, whereas Africa, in more recent centuries, has shifted from a more Animist/Pagan God centered view, to today, being overwhelmingly Islamic or Christian, in that order in terms of total numbers of adherents. And keep in mind, both religions emphasize the One God. Now, unless you think there’s something outside of these facts that accounts for the reasons why Bollywood and Nollywood aren’t much interested in “studying” Aliens-type creatures (and basically being wiped out by them in the end), you’re gonna have to come up with a better theory than that, W.

    Let’s tackle another question you asked: why is it Black folk always seem to clamor being in the picture with Whites? Well, the answer to that one ought to be obvious, but I know history isn’t you’re strong suit-its because Black folk are a part of this country, that’s why-and when we can look at damn near a century’s worth of Westerns, from Wyatt Earp to Bonanza, and not see one prominent Black face in the lot of em, even when we know, for a fact, that a total one third of all Cowboys were Black, well that matters to us. Its because when we see Star Trek and Star Wars ad Alien(s) and Red Planet and Final Fantasy and so on, we want to be seen as also having a future. And not just in a token amount to assauge White folks sometimes delusional sensibilities, either. Its because when we see stuff like Sienfeld and Friends and Woody Allen movies, made not in Fargo North Dakota, where The Big Chill was set, but in thee most multicultural capital of the entire world in the history of human beings, Black folk tend to scratch their head at how its possible for these shows and films to proliferate, for years, in such a city, and not even see Black folk walking by in the background. That’s sick, Willard. It’s, as Harvard Psychiatrist Dr. Alvin Poussaint noted, a disease. And it’s something White folks need to address. Seriously.

    We want to be included, not as a favor, but because we helped build this thing. We contributed and we want to represent. Period. Please note the key difference here, Willard-the NAACP didn’t say a word about the fact that The Big Chill didn’t have Black folk in it, wanna know why?

    BECAUSE BLACK FOLK BY AND LARGE DON’T LIVE IN FARGO, THAT’S WHY.

    Context, Willard. Context.

    Now, let’s takeup another question you raised: why is it Whites don’t seem to care if White folks aren’t in Black films, etc?

    Well Willard, sorry to disabuse you (yet again) but you’re actually wrong. Back in 1989, when Spike Lee’s critically acclaimed Do The Right Thing came out in theatres, he was invited on Oprah to discuss the film. Several seemingly irate White Males were in the audience, who demanded to know why Lee didn’t feature White folks in his films more prominently than he did at the time. Lee’s response was iconic: he asked why it was that these White guys, nor anyone else White, demanded to ask Woody Allen how it was possible to shoot virtually every film he’d ever done in his long career in a city like NYC and NOT see one Black face in them? Of course, the irate White guys had no intelligible reply.

    Perhaps you can do better.

    Now, as to your oft-repeated refrain, about how Black Men just lust after White Women…

    While its true, that after White Male/Asian Female marriages, the highest IR marriages tend to be Black Male/White Female, when one considers the overall marital rates of Black Males, one finds that they invariably marry other Black Females. Moreover, in a time when a Black Man can no longer be killed or lynched for sexing or marrying a White Women, one whould have to conclude that those Black Men who chose Black Women as wives did so as a free choice, and nothing else. So, good luck with your theory.

    No one needs me to point out how powerful images and symbols can be, and how film, tv and the internet tells a great deal about who and what we are. When we can look over the long arc of multi media in a land where multi ethnic groups living together for the most part is a reality, and NOT see that reflected meaningfully and realistically in said media, it says something very profound about said society. Now, I know that brings you much psychic anguish, Willard; I wouldn’t be telling the truth if I didn’t say I derived a bit of guilty pleasure from the thought. But if that is indeed the case, that’s just too bad. This is a majority White country, built on largely Anglo ideas and concepts, but it is not a White country. It never has been. It never will be.

    Learn more about your fellow citizens, Willard.

    O

    LikeLike


  180. on April 14, 2009 at 2:27 pm Obsidian

    LOL. Yea, this is good.

    First off Willie, you need to take the bass outta your voice, like you *think* you gonna do somethin’. I’ll say what the fuck I want, when I want, where I want, for how long I want, you getteth that, Willie? And if you don’t like it, we can meet up here in Philly and se if you’re man enough to makeme change my ways, chumley. Try me.

    Second, you need to be much more precise in your wording; no, you didn’t say “all Asians” you simple said “Asians”-which would lead any normal thinking person to think you meant Asians, in general. If that’s not what you meant, you need to be more careful in how you write and word things.

    Now, for this business about HIV/AIDS-once again, you don’t get out enough. It’s been documented and proven that the number one method of transmission of the virus, both at home and in Africa, ain’t the Downlow (though it is important) as much as it is the nature of polyamorous sexual relationships that are much more common among African peoples than Euro or Asian ones. Sitdown and use the lump of meat on your shoulders as something a bit more than a hat rack, and think about it-you can spread yourself around a lot more if you have “x” number of lovers than if you have only one or two.

    And having been an invited guest in the homes of several gay and lesbian couples and discussed these and other matters at their dinner tables, trust me, I have no fear in the least of such folk. Nor do I have any desire in the least for any other dude. Never did. Never will.

    So, let’s recap:

    Grizzly Man, Fat Polar Bear Lady, and Into The Wild Guy are things that can be seen as a disturbing trend.

    This has not been discussed on any level whatsoever.

    The HIV/AIDS issue, on the other hand, as it relates to African Americans, has been discussed nationally and internationally, at length. Moreover, it has nothing to do with the topic. Nothing. At. All.

    Now, again, Willie, I’ll ask whatever question I want. And if you don’t like it, and you really wanna straighten me out, you know where I am.
    Come and get some, chump.

    O

    LikeLike


  181. on April 14, 2009 at 2:35 pm Default User

    Willard Libby

    Is Die Hard the movie that ends with the black guy killing the very White and very blond Alexander Godinov?

    It has been a long time since I watched Die Hard but I believe it was the (black) desk-bound cop that shot Godinov. The cop had not been able to shoot his weapon since accidentally killing a kid. So in this case it was the black character that found redemption.

    The “cocky black chauffer” just drove our heroes away from the chaos uttering the “can’t wait until New Year” line.
    [cue music]
    [pull back]
    [the end]

    LikeLike


  182. on April 14, 2009 at 2:41 pm Obsidian

    Default,
    Yea, I think you nailed the Die Hard climax. I remember the scene in my head now…it was a portly Black beat cop, right?

    O

    LikeLike


  183. on April 14, 2009 at 2:48 pm PA

    Maybe at this point it takes foreign black directors to make movies in which a black guy isn’t “numinous” or a stick-it-to-whitey annoyance.

    I’m thinking “Training Day,” which as I recall was directed by an African guy. Denzel W. played the evil bastard dirty black cop who finally gets in over his head by tangling with the Russian mob, while Ethan Hawke played the good-guy young white cop, who overcomes the crazed Latin gangsters and Denzel’s character.

    LikeLike


  184. on April 14, 2009 at 2:57 pm Obsidian

    PA,
    Yea, Training Day’s one of my all time faves, precisely because Denzel was freed up to play a smooth criminal type villian. Loved that movie, and had mad Game scenes in it, too.

    O

    LikeLike


  185. on April 14, 2009 at 2:57 pm Gunslingergregi

    “”””””””””Obsidian,
    Now, again, Willie, I’ll ask whatever question I want. And if you don’t like it, and you really wanna straighten me out, you know where I am.
    Come and get some, chump.

    O””””””””””

    lol obsid like I said you are the reverse hitler. Blacks are 12 percent of population but yet you want black to be shoved down the white mans throat and try to choke him on it. You really are the reverse hitler dude.

    LikeLike


  186. on April 14, 2009 at 2:58 pm Gunslingergregi

    I am black you will recognize me for being black I demand recognition. Be carefull what you wish for.

    LikeLike


  187. on April 14, 2009 at 2:59 pm Obsidian

    Go and dry out Gunny, Happy Hour aint started yet.

    O

    LikeLike


  188. on April 14, 2009 at 3:00 pm Tarl

    The “cocky black chauffer” just drove our heroes away from the chaos uttering the “can’t wait until New Year” line.

    He also crashed his limo into the bad guys’ getaway car and knocked out its driver (another black guy).

    LikeLike


  189. on April 14, 2009 at 3:05 pm Gunslingergregi

    It like I will antagonize the white man to kill me if it kills me lol

    LikeLike


  190. on April 14, 2009 at 3:06 pm PA

    Denzel was freed up to play a smooth criminal type villian.

    “Demolition Man” with Sylvester Stallone also features a major black criminal character, though a clownish one (Dennis Rodman?)

    LikeLike


  191. on April 14, 2009 at 3:14 pm PA

    Come and get some, chump.

    Willard made a fair and thoughful response to the things you had brought up earlier. He wasn’t being rude or belligerent.

    LikeLike


  192. on April 14, 2009 at 3:21 pm Gunslingergregi

    “””””””””””Obsidian
    LOL. Yea, this is good.

    First off Willie, you need to take the bass outta your voice, like you *think* you gonna do somethin’. I’ll say what the fuck I want, when I want, where I want, for how long I want, you getteth that, Willie? And if you don’t like it, we can meet up here in Philly and se if you’re man enough to makeme change my ways, chumley. Try me. “””””””””””””””

    Dam willard got you breakin down dude. You might need that drink. Truth is worse than a bullet or punch.

    LikeLike


  193. on April 14, 2009 at 3:24 pm Obsidian

    PA,
    The criminal part in Demolition Man was Simon Phoenix, played by Wesley Snipes. I thought he did a great job, though I agree with you, his outfits and the like were kinda clownish looking.

    As for Willard, there is a huge difference between his and yours. I think anyone here can see the difference between the two. You and I have disagreed with nowhere near the level of vitriol-and I think I’ve shown myself to be a reasonable guy. But if Willie thinks he can throw some weight around O, he got another thing comin’. I don’t take kindly to the kinds of stuf he tried to pull a lil while back, and that’ll make me go right to the end game, if he really bout it, bout it.

    So, so long as he takes a page outta your book, a truly reasonable guy, all will be well. If not…

    O

    LikeLike


  194. on April 14, 2009 at 4:09 pm dougjnn

    PA

    Maybe at this point it takes foreign black directors to make movies in which a black guy isn’t “numinous” or a stick-it-to-whitey annoyance.

    Maybe so. I sure know I’m sick of the “numinous black male” in the movies of the oughts.

    I’m also sick of the huge increase in the number of black white relationships that started around 2002 or 2003 I think. There have always been some, which is fine. But there was around then this huge ramp up.

    LikeLike


  195. on April 14, 2009 at 6:07 pm Default User

    Obsidian

    Yea, I think you nailed the Die Hard climax. I remember the scene in my head now…it was a portly Black beat cop, right?

    Yeah, he was kind of fond of his donuts alright.

    LikeLike


  196. on April 14, 2009 at 6:21 pm Gunslingergregi

    Yea PA didn’t see anything in Willards lines that directed toward physical confrontation. Just a little dose of truth and the meet me in philly line came out.
    Funny shit.

    LikeLike


  197. on April 14, 2009 at 6:25 pm Obsidian

    Well, no one’s gonna accuse Gunny of being too subtle or having a keen sense of subtext,LOL. But anyone reading Willard’s comments, and our exchanges, can easily see where im coming from.

    And I stand by what I said. I’m more than willing to engage him or anyone else here in reasoned, respectful conversation, dialogue, debate. Bring it on. But the minute you try to push, I’ll smack right back.

    Hard.

    Capice?

    O

    LikeLike


  198. on April 14, 2009 at 6:32 pm Gunslingergregi

    What I said I would go to philly and hang out with you

    LikeLike


  199. on April 14, 2009 at 6:34 pm Gunslingergregi

    Na man you do worse shit than he did capice and no one has said to come to there town.

    LikeLike


  200. on April 14, 2009 at 6:38 pm Obsidian

    Really? Then, lets take my posts and compare and contrast to that of Willard’s shall we? I think I can defend my position quite well.

    And yea, we can hangout. I partake not of the spirits though. And you gotta go easy on it if you’re gonna hang with me.😉

    O

    LikeLike


  201. on April 14, 2009 at 6:43 pm Gunslingergregi

    I sent the invite for thailand for some friendly gloves or takedowns but it went unanswered. I think we should prob do some fight club style shit and it would help the debating. But yea your shit with willard trying to physically intimidate someone who was just beinging up some valid points is the same thing I have been saying about niggers for a while now. Except they usually do it in groups of 3 to 5 on one. I am pretty sure if old willard came to town you would have more than yourself ready to beat down the “white” man.

    LikeLike


  202. on April 14, 2009 at 6:48 pm Gunslingergregi

    Don’t drink I mean I can just found I don’t need it to have balls and even with I can still control myself. So why drink just to get a headache. Lets meet at the zoo as it would be appropo.

    LikeLike


  203. on April 14, 2009 at 6:49 pm Obsidian

    Nah, I don’t rassle, that’s for White boys, y’all like that stuff. Strictly Sweet Science and Martial Arts designed to end things quickly, w/a dash of good ole North Philly stretfightin’.😉

    And nah, I don’t need to bumrush Willie. Mano-a-Mano is good enough.

    O

    LikeLike


  204. on April 14, 2009 at 6:55 pm PA

    Virtually every weaponless fight between more or less evenly matched men who aren’t professional fighters ends in grappling, so knowing some wrestling moves is very good to have in a fight.

    LikeLike


  205. on April 14, 2009 at 6:59 pm Gunslingergregi

    Yea for white people pa who tend to fight one on one but niggers pretty much 100 percent fight in packs. Unless they are in some sport fighting that forces them to be alone.

    LikeLike


  206. on April 14, 2009 at 7:01 pm PA

    A major reason is that if no one scores a decisive punch against the other guy, they’ll just keep punching at each other without any real effect (jabbing at the shoulder, back, torso, tensed-up stomach, etc) and within a minute both will be too tired to punch.

    Ever see boxers go into lactic aciodosis? That’s when the arms feel like they weigh a ton and they keep “hugging” each other.

    This is when knowing how to get the other guy into a headlock or twist his arm becomes very handy.

    LikeLike


  207. on April 14, 2009 at 7:02 pm chicnoir

    PA 24/7 transmission of commericals with goofy white guys getting shown up by smarter and cooler black guys
    PA it seems that all men are being made to look like bumbling idiots in commercials. Somehow, the bumbling guy’s wife points him to the right direction and all is well at the end of 30 seconds. The exception are the very handsome( six-packed )men who turn women into bumbling idiots. Ex see 90’s coke commercial with guy on the roof
    Willard It probably gets back to the fact that at one time blacks were the property of wealthy White folks. They were owned, named and numbered by the White Man and this has left a fundamental flaw in the black psyche.
    There is some truth to this statement and I once hinted to as much.

    That’s because as a black male you are disturbed by the image of the black male as being something other than an Alpha heterosexual. I think there is a lot of denial in the black community about this issue.

    Actually many people are very open about it. Women have started to look the other way when it comes to any man who has been in jail/prison for a significant period of time. Many of us understand the need men have for physical affection and being that prison is segragated by gender, many men break down and have same sex relationships.
    BTW, I remember bringing this topic up here and being shut down. I think BI-ness behavior can be found amongst any group of men.

    open Question to anyone: If a str8 man sleeps with a tranny(surgery) who looks just like a woman, is he still str8? I want your honest opinion.

    Mu Its because when we see Star Trek and Star Wars ad Alien(s) and Red Planet and Final Fantasy and so on, we want to be seen as also having a future
    Agreed MU

    Mu Several seemingly irate White Males were in the audience, who demanded to know why Lee didn’t feature White folks in his films more prominently than he did at the time
    Funny enough, almost all of Spike Lee’s early movies featured Italians and not in a good light. I seriously wonder what’s Spike’s beef with Italians.
    Mu as much as it is the nature of polyamorous sexual relationships that are much more common among African peoples than Euro or Asian ones
    Europe and Asia have/had women of the night and courtesans. IIRC, in some parts of china men could have more than one wife.

    LikeLike


  208. on April 14, 2009 at 7:14 pm PA

    Well Gunner — the fact that the Jena punks swarmed a kid and then got a bunch of awards on BET does tell you something.

    LikeLike


  209. on April 14, 2009 at 7:16 pm Obsidian

    Chic, good point in relation to my comments on polyamorous relationships; perhaps it wouldbe better to say, that Black/African folk are just more upfront about it?

    O

    LikeLike


  210. on April 14, 2009 at 7:31 pm Obsidian

    PA,
    Although I’ve seen quite a few bumrushes in my time (and been the target of a few, too), I’ve also seen quite a few one on one fights, all Brothas, so I really don’t see this notion of the Black Man having the lock on the Bumrush as the gospel truth or something, especially since we all can point to Whites and other groups doing this, too.

    Having said that, a popular saying in Boxing is Styles makes Fights. My style is to simply wear the other Man down, by strong defense, precision punches and strikes, making optimal use of my surroundings, making him chase me, etc. Make him tired. Make him frustrated. In fact, the longer the fight goes, the better.

    Really good boxers know how to soften a spot or two up on a body, and then just keep hitting that spot. Yea, I know about the “lead arms” thing you mentioned, but you gotta remember, I’m no stranger to long distance workouts (recall the concrete job I did w/my Dad).

    So, I’m very happy w/just tapping you w/punches, bobbing and weaving, good footwork, getting you to come in and then sidestep, especialy if a obstacle is right behind me. I don’t allow folk to grip me up. Keep your distance.

    And we keep that up as long as the opponent likes-half hour, hour, or more. Doesn’t matter to me. When they eventually tire, that’s when I take them out. I’ve done it. Several times.

    By the way, this line of reason can be found in th Jedi archives. Let’s see who’s sharp enough to see which one it is.😉

    O

    LikeLike


  211. on April 14, 2009 at 7:39 pm Obsidian

    Oh yea Chic, your open Tranny Question:

    My view is that a Man who does the nasty with such a being is a Mo of the First Order.

    Period.

    O

    LikeLike


  212. on April 14, 2009 at 7:45 pm chicnoir

    Mu, what is a Mo?

    LikeLike


  213. on April 14, 2009 at 7:50 pm chicnoir

    that Black/African folk are just more upfront about it?

    Maybe we are but the desire to be with more than one woman at a time has been written about since the beginning of time. Some women have this desire too and it’s one of the reasons why men seek to control female sexuality.

    Let’s not forget that the Prophet Mohammed acknowledged as much as was the chief reason he wrote that a man was permitted to have up to four wives if he could take care of each equally.

    LikeLike


  214. on April 14, 2009 at 8:02 pm dougjnn

    Mu’Min/Obsidian–

    Although I’ve seen quite a few bumrushes in my time (and been the target of a few, too), I’ve also seen quite a few one on one fights, all Brothas, so I really don’t see this notion of the Black Man having the lock on the Bumrush as the gospel truth or something, especially since we all can point to Whites and other groups doing this, too.

    This is absolutely classic Mu “reasoning”.

    so I really don’t see this notion of the Black Man having the lock on the Bumrush as the gospel truth or something, especially since we all can point to Whites and other groups doing this, too.

    It’s as if by pointing out that the phenomenon is spotted outside the black community, it MUST be that it isn’t way more characteristic of blacks than others. Uh, no Mu. Not shown. At all.

    Actually I’d say it’s equally true of Asians when they do fight. They’re group oriented too. Europeans are individual oriented in everyday life. But form the fiercest armies known to man. The Chinese for example have always been, man for man, relatively poor in this.

    LikeLike


  215. on April 14, 2009 at 8:04 pm dougjnn

    Willard Libby said–

    It seems like standard operating procedure for you to sneak around on here talking abut Game and then to pull race out of your ass and then when someone decides to honestly deal with race back at you you decide to play Threatened, Insecure Black Man.

    YOU brought race into the discussion about the woman in the polar bear enclosure. YOU asked “What’s up with White folks” and risky behavior. Now listen up, you don’t get to come on here and make an issue of White Folks without some folks turning it around on you and your people. Got it?

    I agree.

    LikeLike


  216. on April 14, 2009 at 8:24 pm Tupac Chopra

    Willard Libby said–

    It seems like standard operating procedure for you to sneak around on here talking abut Game and then to pull race out of your ass and then when someone decides to honestly deal with race back at you you decide to play Threatened, Insecure Black Man.

    YOU brought race into the discussion about the woman in the polar bear enclosure. YOU asked “What’s up with White folks” and risky behavior. Now listen up, you don’t get to come on here and make an issue of White Folks without some folks turning it around on you and your people. Got it?

    I agree.

    As do I.

    LikeLike


  217. on April 15, 2009 at 12:37 am Obsidian

    Chic,
    A “Mo” is another word for a gay male.

    As for polygamy, history records that in the main, its one Man/”x” numberof Women; rarely is there one Woman/”x” number of Men. Now of course, the easy answer is “well, that’s because the Men can’t handle it”. In my view there’s some truth to this. However, there’s another very important aspect to the whole thing:

    Most Women cannot handle an ongoing sexual relationship with say, 4 or 5 Men at once. Aren’t wired for it. A one night stand? Sure? One shot deal gangbang? Yea. But an ongoing relationship deal? Nah.

    Given the choice, most Women would choose to have one Man exclusively, and when one thinks about it, this makes sense.

    Going back to Blacks/Africans, we have to keep in mind that polyamorous sexual relationships were envogue long before the advent of Islam, though its appearance on the scene certainly drove the nail in the coffin, so to speak.

    True, what you say about China and Europe is onpoint, however, the kinds of polyamorous relationship scenarios don’t seem to be as much in evidence there, especially as it relates to the HIV problem. Although I can’t recall their names right now, there have been indepth studies done by various doctors and scientists in Africa who says that the main problem driving infection rates, aside from not using condoms (it is well known that Black Men by and large loathe them) is the nature of polyamorous sexual relationships in African and by extension, African American society. For reasons that I’ve pointed out to Willard, it seems pretty clear to my why its more prevalent there than in other societies. Maybe the theory doesn’t pan out, but from where I sit it all makes sense. Of course, non of it is politically correct, for any side, SWPL or Black (Female), so the Downlow theme tends to get more sway. Like I said, I think there’s some truth to the DL thing, but I also think its overblown, too. Far more likely to pickup any STD when you’re engaged in a polyamorous relationship and no condoms are involved on the regular.

    Like I said before, most Women, and this includes Black ones, don’t like it known that they are actively screwing the same guy. Yet, we who study Game and social dynamics and so forth know, that *most* guys aren’t getting sex on a the regular, only a relatively small number do.

    O

    LikeLike


  218. on April 15, 2009 at 12:49 am Obsidian

    …And now I will deal with Tupac and Doug’s Amen Corner…

    Both of you quoted Willard’s words above; please note *his* threatened state. First he accuses me of dishonesty, then demands that I account for HIV infection rates among African Americans (which I actually did do). Also, please note in my original remarks to Willard, that I actually AGREED with his thoughts in actual response to my observations wrt the Polar Bear Lady. Don’t wanna confuse anyone with the facts, but there you go.

    The real problem Willard, and a goodly number of, let’s say it, White guys here in this forum, is that they can’t take their assumptions-most of which are based on the most flimsiest of “evidence”-being openly challenged. They’re used to having a “safe haven” where they can spout off out the side of their neck saying all manner of completely outrageous crap about Black folk in particular, Brown and now it seems, Red folk in general. Since most White guys got the hots for Asian gals, they tend to give them a pass however. Go figure.

    Nothing I’ve done here in this forum is underhanded, in any way; I’ve made my positions known, and posed my questions in as upfront a manner as possible. Meanwhile, Willard as a documented track record of hijacking threads, for real, making all kinds of outrageous remarks about folk that have *anything* to do with the dicussion.

    Like I said fellas, ain’t no fun when the rabbit’s got the gun, is it? OMW and quite a few others caught on. Shame such obstensibly smart, on the ball fellas, couldn’t.

    O

    LikeLike


  219. on April 15, 2009 at 1:05 am Gunslingergregi

    obsid you broke the line of i will kick your ass first now you got to apologize to him lol

    LikeLike


  220. on April 15, 2009 at 1:09 am Gunslingergregi

    and willard has had some poignent posts that where hitting on truth at a higher level.

    That one about the outdoors for instance. That was gold.

    LikeLike


  221. on April 15, 2009 at 1:16 am Obsidian

    No, Tupac, Willard crossed the line with his “yo don’t get to come here” crap. Like I told him before, I’ll say what the fuck I want, when, where, and how long I want-and if he *realy* don’t like it, we can arrange a date and time where he can make me stop. And no, I won’t bumrush him, LOL.

    And again, like I said, I AGREED with many of his points. Please review my remarks.

    I, and the vast majority of Black folk in this venue, have actually demonstrated for more reasonable behavior in willing to discuss thee hottest, most contentious issues with guys like Willard. I will not suffer his blatant disrespect on top of his ridiculousness.

    Period. *Glancingat Doug*

    O

    LikeLike


  222. on April 15, 2009 at 1:19 am Obsidian

    My bad, correction, my comment was addressed to Gunny, NOT Tupac. Sorry!

    O

    LikeLike


  223. on April 15, 2009 at 1:28 am Obsidian

    Moreover…

    Not only did I initially agree with those oh so important points Willard raised, but I then proceeded to take up, point for point, his assertions in his post to me, including his diversionary HIV & Black folks attempt. I think any reasonble person would go through what I said and can clearly see my thinking on the matter, hardly as scattershot as Doug has tried to assert (and don’t get me started on Mr. Hairsplitter, LOL).

    So, again: so long as Willard is respectful, we can talk. Even when he says some of thee most outrageous stuff around. But if thinks he can try to bully me, he got another thing comin’. I ain’t havin’ it.

    He’ll be respectful. At least civil.

    O

    LikeLike


  224. on April 15, 2009 at 2:24 am David Alexander

    David Alexander should read that Devlin article anon posted.

    The solution Devlin writes about only seeks to attach beta males to women to create an awful system of slavery that suppresses the beta male and steals his happiness. What good are women who only marry beta males not due to attraction or love, but merely to be fathers for there kids? These men work hard to handover their money in exchange for nothing useful.

    Yeah, like that woman in Ohio who cleaned my hotel room.

    That’s the weird fluke about white people. When we think of “white people”, one generally thinks of billionaire businessmen, politicians, and trust fund types, and even to a lesser extent, the upper middle class professional family. Nobody ever really contemplates the poor whites (who may be of low IQ) who are in low paying service sector type jobs.

    Why do so many blacks feel deeply threatened and insecure when they see White folks in TV/movies socializing WITHOUT the presence of blacks?

    IIRC, I remember reading over at Half Sigma’s place that there’s a sizable chunk of the black population that believes that it’s numbers are far greater than currently counted. I suspect that assessment is inflated by the fact that black people generally live with other black people and thus have very little real contact with white people. Plus, IIRC, outside of the South, the black population is basically in metro areas, so for most black people, it appears that they make up “half” of the country if they’re used to mixed area places like large offices or malls in metro areas. Also, there have always been historical legacies clouding up the representation issue.

    Interestingly, my Canadian mistress was rather surprised at the fact that the black population of the US barely amounts to more than a tenth (12.5%) of the population. She was rather shocked that Canada’s black population barely amounts to 3% of the country. In my anecdotal experience, telling black people the actual percentage of the population strikes them as rather low in most cases, and most have elicited feelings of surprise at the statistics. Most generally have stated around 20% to 25%, and sometimes as high as 50%.

    Mind you, Obsidian’s writings above about feeling “involved”, certain do have a role to play in some of it, but as somebody who watched Seinfeld and Friends, I never really felt threatened by the lack of black characters on most TV shows. It’s probably better that they’re not there, than the writers put in a token, non-realistic character that really doesn’t serve any purpose.

    LikeLike


  225. on April 15, 2009 at 3:06 am Obsidian

    Gotta jump in here Dave.

    I’m not arguing that Seinfeld or Friends get a token Black person on the show to appease the natives; what I’m saying is that I am questioning the hold on reality that Whites have, when they can have long running tv shows and entire films (Woody Allen) shot in a place like NYC and NEVER see a Black face, not as a feature character, but as an extra. This is why I referenced Poussaint, because it is delusional to have such a view, and why I mentioned the reality of Cowboys in the West and nearly a century of cinematic portrayals of the West-theres a huge disconnect there. That’s what I’m saying.

    O

    LikeLike


  226. on April 15, 2009 at 3:29 am Obsidian

    I also wanted to speak to Dave’s “inclusion of Black folk” comments.

    I think its fair to say, that Black folk on a whole, have much more interaction w/Whites, than the other way around. Now, the reason for that is pretty cut and dry-Whites, contrary to the opinion of some here, still do run things, make final decisions and the like in this country. One can argue whether that’s good or bad, but that is a fact, and has been for virtually the whole of this country’s history.

    I think another way to look at this issue is in Jewish America terms, who makeup about 3% total of the US population-yet, when you consider onscreen portrayals, they easily outclass Black folk, being grossly overrepresented. And, last time I checked, there didn’t seem to be a huge hew and cry over that.

    I also think one reason why Black folk may seem to be overrepresented to an extent in certain films and tv shows, is because so often, they tend to be set in places where Black folk can be seen in larger numbers-like urban inner cities. Few shows and movies are set in Appalachia, or the more rural, and mainly White, areas of the country. Again, please note that Black folk didn’t say anything about the lack of Black faces in the film The Big Chill, which was critically acclaimed.

    O

    LikeLike


  227. on April 15, 2009 at 7:35 am chicnoir

    MU Far more likely to pickup any STD when you’re engaged in a polyamorous relationship and no condoms are involved on the regular. The thing is MU some of those brothers who are on the DL are the big money getters. Being from the hood we both know that those brothers have less desirable (character) women surrounding them who have no problem sharing as long as they get their piece of the pie. Sadly, there are sisters of good character who fall for the charms of those fools too. Some want to reform him and some just like a tuff guy or the swagger that big money guys have.

    Going back to Blacks/Africans, we have to keep in mind that polyamorous sexual relationships were envogue long before the advent of Islam, Actually I wasn’t linking the two. I was simply attempting to make the point that the need men have to sleep around seems to cross racial, religious and ethnic boundaries. Islam limits a man to four wives but it’s common in some parts of Africa for a wealthy man to have as many wives as he can afford. There are also some wealthy men who stop at 2 or dare I say 1. It all depends on the guy of course.
    One more thing, many African men inherit a second wife after the death of a male relative(most often a brother). Since a woman becomes a part of her husband’s family after marriage. Now keep in mind that a man is supposed to leave his deceased brother’s wife untouched but of course people do what they can get away with-chic noir maxium #1.

    Most Women cannot handle an ongoing sexual relationship with say, 4 or 5 Men at once
    Keep in mind that most women don’t like it as much as the average guy and women also complain about most men not having a clue on how to do it correctly. Unlike men, women’s bodies just aren’t hard wired to desire it all the time. At the same time, there are women who can enjoy two men at the same time.

    I dare say that most men will have difficulty in juggling 4-5 women at one time. Too many facts, details, and emotions to keep str8 .

    DAthat there’s a sizable chunk of the black population that believes that it’s numbers are far greater than currently counted. I suspect that assessment is inflated by the fact that black people generally live with other black people and thus have very little real contact with white people
    This is true DA, I’ve told Black people that we only make up 12-14% and they were shocked some disbelieving to say the least.

    LikeLike


  228. on April 15, 2009 at 7:49 am Tupac Chopra

    Ob:

    My bad, correction, my comment was addressed to Gunny, NOT Tupac. Sorry!

    No problem, I realize us white folk all look alike.

    LikeLike


  229. on April 15, 2009 at 8:19 am Obsidian

    Chic,
    I think its fair to say that history can find us, and even in our own experience can ferret out for us, far more instances of a Man successfully conducting a ltr w/two or more Women, than the other way around. We both agree, that Women simply aren’t wired that way, not just physically, but emotionally and mentally too.
    We also have to be careful to point out that Women actually favor polygamy moreso than Men do, since Men understand that they may well be the Last Man Standing when the music stops. What most Women don’t want, is to be found that she sharing a Man w/girlfriend accross town. Gotta keep it on the downlow, lol.

    As for the role money plays in the Downlow piece, sure, money will always aid a Man in his Game, but, like the issue itself, I think its overblown. Afterall, it don’t take long to find quite a few Black Women hooked up with Black Men are hardly rich or even well off. What he has is, to use Roissy’s phrase, a suite of Alpha traits that said Black Women find appealing, and we all know that don’t necessarily have anything to do with moneymaking.

    I personally think the whole Downlow thing gets lots of ink because of its man bites dog quality and nature; again, the more likely case is a virtual harem of Women fuckin the same Man, which raises the chances of any one of them being infected, mainly due to the Women are made and because of the fact that its widely known that Black Men tend to frown on condom use.

    O

    LikeLike


  230. on April 15, 2009 at 8:53 am chicnoir

    Mu think its fair to say that history can find us, and even in our own experience can ferret out for us, far more instances of a Man successfully conducting a ltr w/two or more Women, than the other way around
    Mu, I’m not doubting this one bit.
    Let me say this, a woman who conducts two relationships at the same time will most likely hide them since that type of behavior is frowned on. Furthermore, the threat of male violence is so high in this type of arrangement that only a woman who is truly devious will attempt successfully pull of two relationships at the same time. Third let’s not forget the kids MU. Every woman with a little bit of sense knows it’s best to have all of her children by one goodman.

    We both agree, that Women simply aren’t wired that way, not just physically, but emotionally and mentally too.
    Physically yes without a doubt. But* emotionally and mentally is more nurture than nature.

    We also have to be careful to point out that Women actually favor polygamy moreso than Men do
    I guess in some ways women do. For instance, women are willing to make concessions with men who bring the money like professional athletes and *bankers* versus the average man who only brings in 40k per year.

    What most Women don’t want, is to be found that she sharing a Man w/girlfriend accross town. Gotta keep it on the downlow crazy as it seems, some women are even open to knowing the woman and prefer to know the other woman.

    and we all know that don’t necessarily have anything to do with moneymaking.
    But in the hood who gets the girls chasing after them like a lawyer after an ambulance? the hustlers!
    That subset of women are looking for a man who can pay the bills and a few extras since for the most part they are living hand to mouth.

    because of the fact that its widely known that Black Men tend to frown on condom use.
    Mu this seems to cross-racial boundaries. I remember asking this question about six months ago and I got varied answers across the board. As you know, I don’t play that . No glove no love.

    O

    LikeLike


  231. on April 15, 2009 at 9:07 am David Alexander

    I think another way to look at this issue is in Jewish America terms, who makeup about 3% total of the US population-yet

    It’s a slightly similar effect as well, since Jews tend to congregate in areas where other Jews live, so it tends to inflate their worldview somewhat. Plus, I’d contend that they’re really writing about what they know about. I remember watching an quasi-documentary on Good Times, and one of the complaints by the actors was that the writers had no idea of how to write for realistic black characters. I’d question if much as changed over the years…

    but as an extra

    Allegedly, in some cases, extras just happen to be friends and family members who are given token jobs to be in the movie.

    LikeLike


  232. on April 15, 2009 at 9:12 am Obsidian

    Dave Alex,
    Yea, I saw a docu on GT on, I think it was VH1? Anyway, what was profound was, that the parts young Michael spoke *was originally meant for James, the Dad of the Evans family*-but, test audiences didn’t like them coming outta his mouth. Thy felt more comfortable w/lil militant Michael saying it.

    That ish was deep. Think about it.

    O

    LikeLike


  233. on April 15, 2009 at 9:37 am Obsidian

    Chic,
    I happen to have a very good friend, who’s workd for more than a decade in public health; in fact the program he worked in had to do with educating schoolaged boys about things like HIV and AIDS, along with other STDs.

    I got a chance to peruse a lot of the studies material coming out of the NIH and the CDC in Atlanta, because either he or someone else in the office had to go down there frequently for conferences and meetings, etc.

    The studies were fascinating; since the program focused on African Americans, the stats were compared to other groups. By a countrymile, Black folk use contraceptives less, than do Whites, Asians and so on. In the case of Hispanics, its a bit closer.

    In the many “circles” I had acess to, discussion groups with Black Men and Boys on these issues that my buddy’s job conducted, one prominent theme kept recurring: a near adamant refusal to wear condoms.

    On top of that, here in Philly there was an indepth study done to determine who was infected w/STDs and who wasn’t; in the hotbeds of STD activity, not only were they predominately Black, but there were far more females to males *being* infected. That’s what made me think that a kind of de facto polygamous thing was going on-and this was, what, at least 5 years ago?

    Bottomline: Women, if given the choice, free from rebuke, shaming or recrimination, will choose who they deem is the most dominant Male in the environment-and will share him rather not have him at all.

    O

    LikeLike


  234. on April 15, 2009 at 9:38 am David Alexander

    Thy felt more comfortable w/lil militant Michael saying it.

    I must admit, seeing a middle aged family man spouting off revolutionary ideals in the context of a *sitcom* does come across as a bit silly. If this was for a well-written drama, the father in that role would probably make more sense. Plus, I suspect given the era in which the show was written, it would have been somewhat threatening to whites.

    LikeLike


  235. on April 15, 2009 at 9:47 am chicnoir

    but there were far more females to males *being* infected
    Yes it’s much easier to pass STD’s from male-female than vis versa.

    By a countrymile, Black folk use contraceptives less, than do Whites, Asians and so on. In the case of Hispanics, its a bit closer. Oh, I’ve argued and questioned why don’t more blk women esp those who can’t afford children use birth control. Of course you know we have a history of not trusting the medical establishment with good reason.

    Women, if given the choice, free from rebuke, shaming or recrimination, will choose who they deem is the most dominant Male in the environment-and will share him rather not have him at all.
    Not all women but maybe a sizeable portion will. Just want to add that in Africa parents and family have a lot to do with whom a woman marries. .

    Mu, I’m going to drop a link on your site for you to check out ok.

    @DA and MU- Michael was made into the militant because he was seen as less threatening.

    LikeLike


  236. on April 15, 2009 at 9:58 am David Alexander

    Oh, I’ve argued and questioned why don’t more blk women esp those who can’t afford children use birth control.

    I wouldn’t argue that it’s fear of the medical system given that black people still go to hospitals and doctors whenever they’re sick, and black people lagged behind whites in breast feeding, while continuing to use baby formula. I really do suspect that it’s low IQ that may cause some women to simply forget or not even think about properly taking birth control, while others have misguided ideas and falsehoods about ways of avoiding pregnancy. Other may simply have the children to feel emotionally secure, while some may use it as a means of asserting adulthood, and some use their children as bartering chips to get Section 8 and to leave their parent’s homes on taxpayer dollars. One must not neglect those who have kids to keep their boyfriends around and those who just want an alpha’s baby.

    LikeLike


  237. on April 15, 2009 at 10:06 am chicnoir

    DA, I spoken with girls who have are as intelleigent as you and I and when I ask why they don’t use birthcontrol they just sort of shrug their shoulders and look off into the distance. How diffcult is it to understand that if a man plants seeds in or around your private parts you can end up pregnant.

    and black people lagged behind whites in breast feeding, while continuing to use baby formula
    That’s partially because many sisters are trying to perserve the perk🙂

    Other may simply have the children to feel emotionally secure, while some may use it as a means of asserting adulthood, and some use their children as bartering chips to get Section 8 and to leave their parent’s homes on taxpayer dollars. One must not neglect those who have kids to keep their boyfriends around and those who just want an alpha’s baby.

    all very valid points and I believe they play a role.

    LikeLike


  238. on April 15, 2009 at 10:07 am chicnoir

    DA, I spoken with girls who have are as intelligent as you and I and when I ask why they don’t use birth control they just sort of shrug their shoulders and look off into the distance. How difficult is it to understand that if a man plants seeds in or around your private parts you can end up pregnant.

    and black people lagged behind whites in breast feeding, while continuing to use baby formula
    That’s partially because many sisters are trying to preserve the perk🙂

    LikeLike


  239. on April 15, 2009 at 10:34 am Obsidian

    Dave Alex,
    The tailend of your GT comments was on it: White test audiences were threatened by a Black Man saying those kinds of things. Norman Lear, the creator of the show, was himself disgusted by the response, and had numerous frictions with, I think it was CBS, over the creative direction and focus of the show. He also fell out with them over the demise of James Evans, effectively making Florida a single mom.

    Chic and Dave,
    Actually, if IQ has anything to say about reproduction, its that those who have higher IQs tend to reproduce a whole lot less than their cognitive lessers-a problem they need to address, instead of hatin’ on the latter group in a highbrow manner. Unless, that is, they’re cool with Genetic Annihilation-theirs.

    There’s a really good book called Promises I Can’t Keep that I suggest both of you check out if you haven’t already. It’s about Poor Black, White and Hispanic women who choose to have babies. Note the key word here-CHOOSE. It wasn’t by accident. They knew exactly what they were doing. The rationalization on the part of the authors, was that the one thing folk like them could have complete control over, was their loins and the product(s) therefrom.

    And its true, Black moms breastfeed their kids a whole lot less than do White moms-although I’m not as quick to draw the conclusion that this accounts for any problems Black kids may have. We have to keep in mind, that breastfeeding only came back in fashion over the past three decades or so, and during the Baby Boom years, hardly any mom breastfed and baby formula was the norm, Black and White.

    O

    LikeLike


  240. on April 15, 2009 at 10:38 am rob

    “First off Willie, you need to take the bass outta your voice, like you *think* you gonna do somethin’. I’ll say what the fuck I want, when I want, where I want, for how long I want, you getteth that, Willie? And if you don’t like it, we can meet up here in Philly and se if you’re man enough to makeme change my ways, chumley. Try me. ”

    “lots of Black Women don’t really have that big a problem having sex w/the same Man”

    Haha, you agree with the race realist views that blacks are violent and promiscuous.

    LikeLike


  241. on April 15, 2009 at 10:39 am PA

    I recently visited an LDR of a hospital when a relative gave birth and among the multitude of health-related brochures and fliers saw one titles “Breast Feeding for African-American Women.” I wanted to ask the nurse for one on breastfeeding for European-American women, but left it alone.

    LikeLike


  242. on April 15, 2009 at 10:57 am Obsidian

    Who denied either, Rob? Last time I heard, liking to fuck wasn’t a crime, and any organism who doesn’t have a violent gene in them doesn’t live for long.

    So…you were saying?

    O

    LikeLike


  243. on April 15, 2009 at 12:38 pm Benedict Smith

    Darwin award almost.

    LikeLike


  244. on April 15, 2009 at 9:10 pm omw

    I sort of understand the “Breastfeeding for AA Women” fliers. It’s complicated.

    The whole business has gotten the unmistakeable stink of whitermom status-whoring all over it sometimes.

    (and after spending three years of my life doing it, am not so convinced I’d knock myself out so much, if I had to do it all over again.)

    LikeLike


  245. on April 15, 2009 at 10:20 pm anon

    To David Alexander: your Canadian mistress, I’m presuming, lives in a big metropolis, like the Greater Toronto Area. I presume this, because the only way a black Canadian could be so deluded as to figure they comprise 25-50% of the population, is if that’s what they observe in their day-to-day life; e.g. such as would be the case in many parts of Toronto.

    A black Canadian growing up in a rural area would know better, and probably estimate close to the 3% actual proportion. Believe me; I’m a minority Canadian myself; I was the only dark-skinned kid at my elementary school, and I was made painfully aware of that fact, repeatedly.

    LikeLike


  246. on April 15, 2009 at 10:30 pm Gunslingergregi

    Was it your own inner problem. I lived in ghetto but my parents sent me to catholic school. Had three black guys who went there. Never saw them have one problem with being black with all white people.

    LikeLike


  247. on April 16, 2009 at 8:28 am Default User

    omw, PA

    Regarding breastfeeding for AA women.

    I think there are large differences in the rate of breastfeeding between white and black women.

    Breasfeeding is thought to be very good for the child (far better than formula).

    Amongst other things it is associated with healthy brain development. Some estimate that an increase in black breastfeeding could add five points to the average black IQ.
    [Breast milk contains a large amounts of healthy fats not found in formula. And lets not forget parent/child bonding]

    Maybe the people producing these brochures are not Whitermom types at all…

    LikeLike


  248. on April 16, 2009 at 8:07 pm anon

    Gunslingergregi: I assume you’re addressing me? Was it my own inner problem? No, it wasn’t; it was real. Am I bitter? No; today, I don’t really give a hoot; I have no chip on my shoulder, and I’m a rightist criticizing affirmative action, etc., and I hate identity politics. I’m just telling it like it was. Funny thing; in high school, there were only a few more dark-skinned individuals, still quite a small group, but it made all the difference, it seemed; virtually nobody there cared about race; I only encountered one idiot, who misidentified my origins with a slur about another group, which made me laugh at his ignorant white-trash ass.

    LikeLike


  249. on April 16, 2009 at 8:30 pm Anonymous

    Nah, not all the people who encourage breastfeeding are your whitermom sorts.

    Just that about a million overeducated, undertalented women with apparently nothing more interesting to do have an unpleasant tendency to get involved in “breastfeeding advocacy” and taint the entire thing by association.

    You walk into a La Leche League meeting sometime and tell me what you see.

    Some do mean well, but the posturing masses have a tendency to inflate the whole process into a status competition where they’re holding the best hand at the table. Typical, no?

    That said, the IQ and breastfeeding link had been disproven, last I heard.

    Not that it’s not beneficial, not that it’s not wonderful, but the whole thing, IMO, has been just a “titch” oversold.

    LikeLike


  250. on April 27, 2009 at 7:08 am Anonymous

    You are such a twat.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2015. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    • Username alt-consilience available: GYNECOMASPERGERS 14 minutes ago
    • @OhioCoastie The Rude Word of the God of Biomechanics. 18 minutes ago
    • @RibaldusDerb well, you def had something to work with there. was she legit mad when she said "bf" 3x, or half-smiling? 18 minutes ago
    • @Royalty_Kin @iowahawkblog good point. endlessly happy people are usually escapees from the funny farm. 20 minutes ago
    • @RibaldusDerb 3x times in a row? she's interested. what happened next? 24 minutes ago
    • When high-trust meets low-trust, guess who wins? twitter.com/healthuever/st… 27 minutes ago
  • Recent Comments

    Sentient on Game And IQ
    Sentient on Game And IQ
    Captain Obvious on Game And IQ
    Enfant Terrible on SoftWhites Vs SlavWhites
    Captain Obvious on Game And IQ
    jackmcg on SoftWhites Vs SlavWhites
    VRW on Game And IQ
    Ironpusher on The Earnest Futility Of…
    vfm#7634 on SoftWhites Vs SlavWhites
    vfm#7634 on SoftWhites Vs SlavWhites
  • Top Posts

    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • Game And IQ
    • The Earnest Futility Of "Proposition Nation" Magical Thinking
    • SoftWhites Vs SlavWhites
    • A Preview Of The Trump-Hillary Debates
    • The Five Female Body Types (And One Is The Very Best)
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • Penis Size Around The World
    • An Alt-Right "Nine Theses" (or "Disputation on the Power of Elite Indulgences")
    • A Devious Takeaway
  • Categories

  • Chaos

    • People of Walmart
    • PostSecret
    • Stuff White People Like
    • The Daily Sarge
    • Things My Boyfriend Says
    • xkcd
  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • The G Manifesto
    • The Rookie
    • Treatise of Love
    • VKs empire of dirt
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Information Processing
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • Mangans Miscellany
    • OneSTDV
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • The Harem and Mongol Hordes

    • Alias Clio
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • Gucci Little Piggy
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Hyperbole and a Half
    • In Mala Fide
    • Jack Goes Forth
    • Overcoming Bias
    • The Fourth Checkraise
    • The Rawness
    • Udolpho

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,605 other followers

Build a website with WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: