• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Hangover Game
Girls Who Insisted I Use A Condom »

Washington Post Fembot Tells Cuckold ‘Suck It Up’

May 12, 2009 by CH

A diligent reader emailed me a ‘Beta of the Month’ submission about a guy who fears he may have been cuckolded and who turns to a Washington Post advice columnist for support in his time of need. I read the article and decided that the real value to be gleaned was not in the unearthing of stupefying betatude (after all, at Chateau Heartiste where the better angels of humanity are handcuffed to bedposts and repeatedly gangbanged by their demonic cousins, mewling cuckolds are mere run of the mill betas), but in the reply to the beta chump by Carolyn Hax, a Washington Post Style columnist.

I reprint the column in full along with my remarks, so that you may glimpse the true face of woman.

Here is the original cry of anguish by the man who believes his child is not of his beta loin:

Hi, Carolyn:

I’m writing to you because I don’t know who else to ask. My wife and I have been happily married for six years. We have a beautiful daughter, age 2. For about the past six months I have suspected my daughter isn’t really “mine.” I have never suspected my wife of cheating on me, but for a number of reasons I cannot quiet my suspicions about the baby. I have not confronted my wife because I know that might devastate our marriage. But I have to know. What should I do?

Suspicious

If a man suspects his wife has cuckolded him, the odds of his child not being his rise to 30%. The general nonpaternity rate is around 4%. Low confidence “fathers” are right to be worried. Cuckoldry is serious business because it is the female form of rape.

So by the second sentence I know this guy is a Natural Born Beta. It’s always the guys getting most screwed by their wives who persist in believing they are “happily married” seconds before she’s caught with her boss’s dick in her mouth. Another telltale sign of the beta: If he cajoles tepid sex out of his wife once a month he thinks that is proof the marriage is full of love. If you want to know how well a marriage is doing, don’t look at the husband’s face for hints of marital bliss; look at the wife’s face.

Now we’ll examine the Style columnist’s family counseling advice. You may want to prepare a crucifix and garlic.

Give careful thought, please, to what you “have to” know.

This is going to be good. The first words out of her mouth are a slopbucket of shame aimed straight at… the man.

When just seeking the truth could change your life in dramatic and irreversible ways, it’s best to start not by actually doing something but by inviting each possible truth into your imagination as fact.

What the fuck does she mean here? This is postmodern therapeutic age gibberish squared. Nonsense on stilts. “Invite each possible truth into your imagination as fact”? Screw action, just imagine everything is true. Embrace the female way: Wallow in your psychodrama while getting nothing accomplished. It’s no wonder the newspaper empire is crumbling with the third rate hacks they have writing for them nowadays. I spewed more sensible shit after a 12 hour dorm room pot and Milwaukee’s Best bender.

That way, you can figure out the way you want your life to look before you start saying things you might regret.

Wait, did I miss something, or did Miss Hax Off Your Balls just guilt trip the guy who got cuckolded?

If your life were a physical structure, this would be the “blueprint before sledgehammer” approach.

Translation: If you just take a breather and don’t let your anger and pain get the best of you, you’ll find that life as a beta provider for an alpha’s kid isn’t so bad. Your wife will love you for your measured approach and self-sacrifice, and the most important thing is to keep your wife happy, right? Right? At the very least…

…do it for the children.

If your “number of reasons” points to infidelity, for example, then you need to imagine the worst, and assume your wife did cheat — Imaginary Scenario 1 — and then you need to decide whether you’d want to stay in the marriage or leave.

I’d think the decision would be self-evident, but hey, we’re talking about spineless betas and amoral women here, so everything is up for grabs. Bizzaro America!

If the answer is to stay (Scenario 1a), then you need to ask yourself, is that outcome better served by not digging into the past?

If the guy decides to stay and prove to the world what a pathetic sap he is, then I suppose he deserves the indignity of having his worthlessness as a man rubbed in his face every time his non-kid is in the same room with him. If he’s that low on the self-esteem pole then he might be able sack down and survive eighteen years without once mentioning his wife’s whoring and the kid who doesn’t look anything like him. I can imagine the thoughts going through his head, when years later our protagonist is coaching his daughter’s soccer team: “Wow, she’s so athletic and assertive. And so attractive, too. Maybe it’s for the best that my genes weren’t passed on. Life is beautiful!”

If the answer is to leave (1b), are you ready to challenge your paternity — or have it challenged by your at-that-point-estranged wife?

1b? Is this superfluous numbering system supposed to make her sound scientific? Maybe it’s just my male logic, but if the guy decides to leave the marriage on account of strong evidence — say, oh I dunno, a paternity test — that he is a cuckold, then it wouldn’t much matter if his cheating whore of a wife is estranged from him or challenges what he already challenged.

If, on the other hand, your suspicions are based solely on your child’s appearance, then you need to ask yourself if you’re being irrational; genes are a lot more complicated than the “She has a cleft chin and therefore can’t be mine” parlor games would suggest.

More shame. You starting to notice a pattern? This is what women do when they have nothing left to fall back on but hollow arguments. Fact: Babies look more like their fathers than their mothers. This is an evolutionary adaptation that ensures fathers will stick around to care for the infant. “Cleft chin” red herring notwithstanding, if the guy thinks his kid doesn’t look like him and therefore could be the cable guy’s kid, he’s got a 30% chance of being dreadfully right.

But let’s say instead you have an unshakeable gut instinct that this is someone else’s child. If you’re right, then the percentages would be obviously (and heavily) in favor of infidelity, which loops you back to Scenario 1.

Still, you can’t entirely rule out the rarer than rare, yet not unprecedented, hospital error — Scenario 2 —

She’s flailing.

so you also have to imagine your way through to the conclusion of a different worst-case altogether: If the baby turns out to be neither yours nor your wife’s biological child, would you still love this baby?

Alpha answer: No.
Beta answer: No, but I’ll say yes because it’s what’s expected of me.

Want to raise her?

Alpha answer: Hello, orphanage drop off box!
Beta answer: My wife said she’ll stop giving me biannual handjobs if I don’t say I’ll love the child as if it were my own.

Want to find your biological child and switch?

Style columnist Hax either has a weak grasp of human nature, or a weak grasp of rhetorical devices.

In other words, would it make a difference if this were error vs. deception?

No. If it was a hospital error, then the wife should be equally pleased as her husband to know the truth. Their marriage would remain strong, or at least viable, as they made arrangements with the hospital to find their true baby and swap kids with the other victimized family who mistakenly got their kid.

If it was deception, then their marriage (hopefully, but you can never know for sure with these congenital betas) will dissolve, but the cuckold will have spared himself the humility and genetic metadeath of providing for another man’s legacy with his sweat and tears while his own sad seed withers to dust.

If you decide you’d want this child no matter what, then the question becomes, again, why you’d want to risk everything to scratch even a torturous itch.

Is the idea of robbing a man of eighteen years of his life and a chance to bear and love his own children meaningless to this Style columnist? Here’s an analogy, Miss Hax, you could try wrapping your twisted cancerous soul around: A man getting cuckolded is the moral equivalent of a woman getting secretly implanted with another woman’s fertilized egg, giving birth to it, and raising it for eighteen years.

Is any of this getting through to you? Bitch?

And finally: What if you started digging, wrecked your marriage and learned your daughter is “yours”?

Q-tip swab of the kid’s cheek while the wife is away takes two seconds. He can have the sample tested with no one the wiser. If the kid is his, hey, he can sleep easy at night and feel good about helping his kid with her homework. The proof of his paternity might even motivate him to go down on his wife. If the kid isn’t his, the marriage was wrecked long before he “started digging”.

I urge you to imagine your way down every painful avenue here, best cases as well as worst.

Translation: I urge you to find it in your heart to put aside your doubts for the good of your wife and bastard child.

Then, once you’ve figured out what you can live with emotionally, please, if you’re considering any action at all, have a lawyer vet it legally.

Vet? Vetting is beta. Get the paternity test done before consulting any lawyers, and when you do get a lawyer with test results in hand, make sure your wife doesn’t find out about any of it until you slap her with the divorce papers. You don’t do battle with a whore by playing nice.

Only then can you be confident whether truth-seeking serves your interests — and your family’s — or smashes them to bits.

Shame! It’s what’s for dinner! Gotta love her admonishing a cuckold — the victim, remember? — that he needs to serve his family’s interest along with his own. I guarantee every woman reading this Post article nodded their heads in agreement with the author, and probably quite a few limpwristed faggy SWPL betaboys agreed, too. A better illustration of the second class status of beta males in society — as foretold by our evolutionary heritage — would be hard to find. Women are simply assumed to be moral paragons and Vestal Virgins, and betas are… there to be ransacked.

Give, betas, give till it hurts. And when the hurt begins, don’t bitch and moan about your endless torment. Just keep giving. While you’re paying the last ounce of tribute in self-respect, here’s some porn to keep your senses dulled.

***

Whenever I read articles by women attempting to grapple with the evil of cuckoldry, the impression I am always left with is one of fear. I can smell the fear in their words. It emanates from every ill-conceived shaming maneuver and transparent rationalization. The emptiness of their amoral excuse-mongering is beyond lame.

“If you confront your wife over her cheating your family will shatter.”

If she cheated the family is already shattered.

“You have to suck it up for the good of the child.”

She should have thought of the child’s welfare before spreading wide for the alpha interloper to blast in her pussy.

“What good will come of the truth?”

Good has got nothing to do with it. But justice and dignity do. Not to mention the Darwinian prime directive.

Finally, my favorite of all the cuckoldry excuser tactics:

“Be the GOOD MAN and take one for the team. After all… *wink wink*… it’s not like you’re gonna find another woman.”

To which a man should answer in the only way acceptable: FUUUUUUUCK YOU.

The fear coming from women when the spotlight is on efforts by men to expose cuckoldry is perfectly understandable. Humans fear most the loss of mating power, and the prerogative of women to get impregnated on the sly with an alpha while foisting the bill on a beta is a hardwired preference millions of years old. Any threat to the established order, especially an existential threat as game-changing as DNA paternity testing, will send women into involuntary apoplexies of hair-raising moral myopia. The beastly decrepitude of their animal souls will lay bare for all to see.

Hallmark doesn’t make cards for moments like these.

The first Sexual Apocalypse was heralded by the death song of the following Four Sirens: the Pill, No-Fault Divorce, Economic Gender Egalitarianism, and Misandrist Laws. But a new era is upon us. As I see it, the future of humanity will radically change once again with the coming of the Three Horsemen of the Second Sexual Apocalypse:

Widespread, accurate and accessible paternity testing.
The male Pill.
Realistic sexbots.

Paternity testing alone is enough to alter women’s sexual behavior in a big way. Mandatory paternity testing is already on the docket in some legislatures. There have been hopeful signs of justice being served. It’s not enough to say “Well, only 3-4% of women cuckold their husbands. So really, not much will change.” The impact isn’t in the marginal loss of cuckoldry as a mating strategy, but in the *perception* of loss by *all* women. Even the most faithful, loving wife has the corrupt core of a cheating whore buried deep in her hindbrain. Blasting rays of sunlight on her gnarled, caged id won’t be met with good cheer. I predict very few fertile-age women will be emotionally invested in men’s paternity rights, and in fact most of them will advocate against it. Pussywhipped beta males and opportunistic alpha males sufficiently sequestered from the negative consequences of their decisions will likely defend the women in hopes of short term gain in payment of sexual favors. If you think alpha males of middling resources would vigorously support mandatory paternity testing, remind yourself who benefits the most from cuckoldry.

Here is Miss Hax’s contact info:

Write to Tell Me About It, Style, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20071, or tellme@washpost.com.

It would be fun if my readers sent her a link to my post under the ruse of fan mail. The goal isn’t to change her mind — no, that will never happen — the goal is to drive a chainsaw through her soul. To make her hurt. To sear her ego with the harsh, ugly truth. Sadism is an exquisite pleasure for those practitioners trained in the art of administering it.

***

A final note: I will play therapist for a moment and give proper counseling to Mr. “Suspicious”:

Q-tip. Swab. Paternity testing clinic. The rest is commentary.

And because I am a gracious and good man of charitable inclination, I also give my tender and supportive counseling to Miss Hax:

“Please, Miss Hax, take a seat on the couch over there. Yes, that’s good. Ok… now… tell me only the bad things that come to mind when you hear the word

C  U  N  T.”

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Beta, Marriage Is For Chumps, Pretty Lies, Tool Time | 1,048 Comments

1,048 Responses

  1. on May 12, 2009 at 12:30 pm Piglet

    Preach it, my man. I cannot tell you how appalled I’ve always been by my (supposedly ethical) female friends’ barely-veiled-yet-brazen endorsement of exactly this kind of female behavior. You’re doing the Lord’s own work.

    LikeLike


  2. on May 12, 2009 at 12:34 pm Goober

    Carolyn Hax has always been unintelligible. I tried to read her a few years ago, but I quickly gave up when I realized I had NO IDEA what she was saying. Worthless.

    LikeLike


  3. on May 12, 2009 at 12:42 pm FYI

    All men should stock up on this…http://www.paternity-answers.com/home-paternity-test.html

    LikeLike


  4. on May 12, 2009 at 12:45 pm Horndog

    This guy’s problem isn’t that he’s a beta.

    It’s that he’s a fucking idiot. You think “your” 2-year-old kid isn’t yours, and your first action is to write to a fucking newspaper columnist?

    LikeLike


  5. on May 12, 2009 at 12:45 pm The G Manifesto

    Wow.

    Its stuff like this that makes me realize I am correct (for the millionth time) in never wanting to get married and to swoop mad amounts of fly girls.

    There is really no other option in life.

    Not like I mind.

    I like swooping tons of fly girls.

    – MPM

    LikeLike


  6. on May 12, 2009 at 12:49 pm gig

    I’m writing to you because I don’t know who else to ask
    friendless

    but for a number of reasons I
    insisted on self denial

    I have not confronted
    fearful

    I am with the women in this one. Guys like this must suffer. And be wiped out from the gene pool.

    LikeLike


  7. on May 12, 2009 at 12:49 pm quikhit

    It’s just ugly out there. Why don’t we paint the letter “A” on these women anymore?

    LikeLike


  8. on May 12, 2009 at 1:05 pm Firepower

    My wife and I have been happily married for six years. We have a beautiful daughter, age 2. For about the past six months I have suspected my daughter isn’t really “mine.”

    yeesh. i knew kassyk was cruel, but i never knew she married lol

    LikeLike


  9. on May 12, 2009 at 1:10 pm Simon

    Imagine if paternity testing was required at the time of birth. Since fembots control our politics, it’s not very likely.

    LikeLike


  10. on May 12, 2009 at 1:11 pm ironrailsironweights

    Does my wife have the seed of bald-eagle loving david alexander in her?

    Peter

    [editor: we’ve got to make you more interesting. it’s audience appreciation day.]

    LikeLike


  11. on May 12, 2009 at 1:18 pm sara I

    Why all the beating around the bush. He should just simply say to her what is on his mind. After a nice conversation where she verbally expresses her affection for him (he DID say they were “happily” married) he could sandwich his question thusly;

    I hear you telling me you love me and it makes me feel so good knowing that, but I’m wondering right now if that kid is actually mine or someone else’s. I think we should schedule a DNA paternity test. By the way, I love you too.

    See? Nice, sweet, simple, to the point, gets the job done.

    LikeLike


  12. on May 12, 2009 at 1:22 pm sara I

    P.S. Too bad there’s not a test where a woman can test her husband’s DNA for children produced outside the marriage. Big difference I’m sure as she is not “paying” for them; or is she? Just a different type of payment. A payment called life, time, and trust wasted with lying cheater.

    LikeLike


  13. on May 12, 2009 at 1:24 pm Firepower

    sara I

    See? Nice, sweet, simple, to the point, gets the job done.

    i prefer Lifetime Channel stuff where one spouse is applauded for burning to death the one that smacks the other one around.

    just think how much more deeeeeee-lish-uss the TV-VL warnings shalll be when Torquemada’s tools are dusted off to punish one guilty of an even worse 18 years of anguished fraud

    LikeLike


  14. on May 12, 2009 at 1:31 pm David Alexander

    Another telltale sign of the beta: If he cajoles tepid sex out of his wife once a month he thinks that is proof the marriage is full of love.

    A proxy for a low sex drive that could be common to all beta males or merely relief that he’s having more sex than his beta friends who get nothing at all?

    “Wow, she’s so athletic and assertive. And so attractive, too. Maybe it’s for the best that my genes weren’t passed on. Life is beautiful!”

    The flip side of that is that if people can’t really tell, then the success of that child is attributed to you, and in theory, you could leverage that to attract other women who may find you attractive. Of course, what I just wrote was basically pointless since it’s the equivalent of using a rented car to attract women. Eventually, your beta ways will reveal all and remove any options for an extra-marital affair. Plus, that presumes she stays around and you’re not plunking money down on child support for her when you barely see her at your court ordered custody meets.

    The fear coming from women when the spotlight is on efforts by men to expose cuckoldry is perfectly understandable.

    As I stated last night, some men are for hugging and other men are for fucking, and I suspect there’s a subconscious operating practice in women that attempts to maximize that situation. Of course, it doesn’t work if the betas know that they’re only useful for hugs and either opt-out entirely or just go the platonic friend route which only gives limited support and resources.

    LikeLike


  15. on May 12, 2009 at 1:31 pm Michael Wears a Hat

    “I am with the women in this one. Guys like this must suffer. And be wiped out from the gene pool.”

    If he’s a loser (which he is) then she’s the loser who married the loser.

    Whatever way you come at it from, it boils down to social acceptance of the rape of man. Its ethically wrong, no matter how much the man sucks. If he sucks that bad, let him die alone.

    LikeLike


  16. on May 12, 2009 at 1:32 pm Michael Wears a Hat

    Ha Ha

    Sara I is full of shit.

    LikeLike


  17. on May 12, 2009 at 1:34 pm gig

    i’ll be the devil’s advocate here.

    given that women that cuckold are not shamed anymore, but rather feel “empowered”, and this kind of behaviour towards betas is unlikely to go away until the mexican-islamic order dawns over America,

    option 1: he breaks the marriage. She takes part of his income in alimony. It will be too much for him, but too few for her. The child will get a sub-par infancy. the woman can only re-enter the sexual market as a cougar. The guy can re-enter, but I don’t see THAT many wounded betas getting an alpha conversion after such a massive cuckold.

    option 2: marriage remains. Alpha offspring gets the best education possible. Cheating whore remains with EXACTLY the same sexual options she would get after a divorce. cuckolded beta pays entirely for the child education. And is wiped from the gene pool.

    coldly speaking, divorce hurts woman and child and won’t necessarily benefit the beta. After divorce, it is quite possible that the husband won’t have ANY sex life excluding hookers. How old is he? how much of his income will he keep after alimony? does he still have friends going out?

    people just assume that the cuckolded husband will go from once-a-month-sex to G-manifesto like massive swooping of fly girls.

    LikeLike


  18. on May 12, 2009 at 1:37 pm HR Lincoln

    on May 12, 2009 at 1:18 pm sara I

    “I hear you telling me you love me and it makes me feel so good knowing that, but I’m wondering right now if that kid is actually mine or someone else’s. I think we should schedule a DNA paternity test. By the way, I love you too.”

    Knowing human nature as I do – the angriness of the woman’s ouburst at that point would be a solid indicator of the test results.

    LikeLike


  19. on May 12, 2009 at 1:39 pm gig

    woman are practical. not in a business-like way, but in what concerns relationships. Practical to the point of forgetting about ethics. Just like any successful businessman will always resort to anti-ethical behaviour given the chance

    the rbeak up of this marriage hurts two of three certainly and doesn’t necessarily benefit the third. the maintainance benefits two of three and is not necessary a worst outcome for the third.

    there is also the bonus-argument, the hitlerian argument, that the gene pool is improved by more alpha offspring.

    LikeLike


  20. on May 12, 2009 at 1:40 pm Cannon's Canon

    “When just seeking the truth could change your life in dramatic and irreversible ways, it’s best to start not by actually doing something but by inviting each possible truth into your imagination as fact.” – Hax

    I’m actually in partial agreement with the author’s female psyche here. I am in the process of employing the same strategy toward the future murders I will commit. I want to make sure that I can face myself confidently and proudly after the fact. So, I try to address myself as a cold-blooded killer to see if I can deal with it (so far, no problems).

    I used the same deliberation process before my first steroids cycle.

    LikeLike


  21. on May 12, 2009 at 1:42 pm Michael Wears a Hat

    gig: the beta has better chances as he gets older. Furthermore, the simple act of kicking his cuckolding wife to the curb may serve to make him a little less of a little bitch. Obviously, if he’s too chickenshit to do so, he wouldn’t have better prospects outside marriage anyway.

    That said, this strikes me as a situation where damage to the individuals serves society’s best interests. Over the long run, society will be much better off if cuckolding women are ruthlessly shamed and them and their children cut out from the ‘pack’. The man should be encouraged to act like a man in the true sense of the word, not in the be-a-beta-provider sense.

    LikeLike


  22. on May 12, 2009 at 1:47 pm gig

    Over the long run, society will be much better off if cuckolding women are ruthlessly shamed

    Unless mandatory paternity testing is imposed, or Sharia becomes the law of land, as Americans say, this kind of behaviour has ZERO chance of going away.

    Since it won’t go away, individual tragedies won’t add to the common good. They will remain individual tragedies.

    LikeLike


  23. on May 12, 2009 at 1:49 pm z

    Dont forget artifical wombs Roissy.

    That will be the biggest blow to women of them all, and there are coming, probably in about 20 years.

    When men can pick beautiful, intelligent, college age-women’s eggs, and have a couple of kids on their OWN, that no woman can (via the courts) take away from them, why would any of them settle for an actual wife at all (other than for religious reaons).

    I would think a man would be better off paying for some hot European chick’s eggs, having the 9 month incubator “birth” them at a lab, and enjoy raising his -own- couple of kids while he chases pussy out there openly for the rest of his life.

    Women, basically have this option now. They can just get knocked up, and make some chump pay them child support, and enjoy chasing a variety of men while their kids are still theirs—-and cannot be taken away by the biological fathers.

    When men have the same option, it will truly change out there.

    What really happened between the sexes, happened when the state determined that children BELONG to the mothers, and routinely awarded the mothers custody and child support. I think the state should always award joint custody (kids at one house one week, and the other house the next) IN ALL cases, and NO CHILD SUPPORT (he has them just as much as she does). That would fix most of the unfairness we see in “family” courts.

    LikeLike


  24. on May 12, 2009 at 1:49 pm lurker

    Sara I, you bizznich. You take the child our for the afternoon “to give you the day off, honey.” Take it to a doctor in another town that you’ve never seen before and pay cash to him for a genetic test. Get the results mailed to your work/pick up a few days later.

    Or do it at home, but at a Dr.’s office is safer.

    Asking a wife’s permission? Just hand in your balls right there.

    LikeLike


  25. on May 12, 2009 at 1:51 pm Default User

    sara I

    Why all the beating around the bush…

    Stop taunting GNPeter (ironrailsironweights)

    LikeLike


  26. on May 12, 2009 at 1:52 pm ironrailsironweights

    Why all the beating around the bush.

    Do you mean the sweetly trimmed bush often seen on the types of pretty young women i no longer have access to? *sigh*.

    Peter

    [editor: construction ahead.]

    LikeLike


  27. on May 12, 2009 at 1:53 pm El Guapo

    Oh please. This guy is useless as husband and mate. Speaking as the bull from a couple hot-wife/cuck situation (long ago in a galaxy far far away) this guy is almost a poster child.

    He dutifully goes about his business, oblivious to all female signals that his wife is lonely, unhappy and horny as hell, doesn’t stand up to her because he has no backbone, etc etc etc. When hotwife goes on the business trip, her roaming eyes pick up on some tall, dark, handsome male (or the other holy trinity of big brain, big muscles, big cock), then both use the 1000-mile excuse for free-wheeling banging, and since women are most ready to stray at egg-time, viola — little cute girlie baby with double serving of I’m-gonna-fuck genes.

    I bet the odds in this case are 99% that the kid isn’t his. I bet if remembers, there will be a moment about two weeks too late for his baby’s conception where hotwife decided to bang hubby out of style for a few days to cover the stray, and then she conveniently “backdated” the sex at the OB/GYN’s office.

    If he were a real man he would get the damn paternity test and with a positive result in hand prepare the multiple nuke strikes of a crushing divorce proceeding making sure alimony and child support were nil.

    LikeLike


  28. on May 12, 2009 at 1:53 pm lurker

    It’s the same in every society that’s ever existed: when women and gay men are given free social reign without condemnation for their actions, the society falls.

    LikeLike


  29. on May 12, 2009 at 1:54 pm z

    All the cartoons that accompany Caroline Hax’s columns are drawn by HER EX HUSBAND
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolyn_hax

    …………………..she would definitely know all about betas…..

    LikeLike


  30. on May 12, 2009 at 1:58 pm lurker

    sara I, being the womyn she is:

    “Just a different type of payment. A payment called life, time, and trust wasted with lying cheater.”

    -lol. Or a lifetime of hot sex, trying to prevent her man from screwing around yet secretly enjoying the fact that he beds hotter women besides himself yet doesn’t leave her, making her feel worthy.

    If sara’s man went muff diving in 22 year old pussy but came up for air to pay her bills, she ‘d hem and haw publically and then spread her legs nightly just thinking about what other pussy his dick’s been in.

    Hmm, maybe women ARE secretly all lesbians.

    A woman talking about trust being the foundation to a marriage (typical modern pseudo-intellectual nonsense) is always talking about the man *never questioning* her actions, not the other way around.

    LikeLike


  31. on May 12, 2009 at 2:03 pm A. Pavelic

    Related stories here:

    http://www.reason.com/news/show/29035.html

    http://www.reason.com/news/show/28570.html

    Please not that the power of the State is behind this kind of shit. You will be fucked over, once buy your cheating whore of a wife and again by the State. Forget any sense of justice, that idea is long gone (true justice being something that many would never want to actually confront).

    lurker is correct however, the society in which we live is an increasingly shaky edifice that is actually in the process of collapsing. Free reign has been given to culture destroyers, not culture bearers and creators. We are paying the price. One good thing though is that bloody revenge will be wrought upon those who have put us in this situation. Perhaps even men like the one who wrote this letter will become Men again.

    LikeLike


  32. on May 12, 2009 at 2:05 pm PA

    — Why all the beating around the bush. He should just simply say to her what is on his mind.

    Sara is right. If a husband can’t look at his pregnant wife and joke “you know that if I have my doubts, I’m taking a DNA test?”

    Or look at his little bouncing toddler and joke “is he/she mine? ’cause I don’t run like that. I think I’m getting a DNA test”

    … then it’s like Guns n Roses said:

    What we’ve got here
    Is failure to communicate.

    Is it that damn hard to swing enough of a sac in your marriage to make veiled warnings wrapped in a joke to your wife?

    Why do so many men walk on eggshells with their women? Where’s the damn fear coming from?

    LikeLike


  33. on May 12, 2009 at 2:06 pm Roissy is a Troll

    Roissy calls cheating women female rapists….and yet he won’t codemn the men who sleep with these women. If men would simply stop sleeping with committed women, we wouldn’t have these situations.

    LikeLike


  34. on May 12, 2009 at 2:06 pm z

    Look at who gets to advise women in our society folks (boy am I gonna catch some shit for this!)

    1) Ann Landers (real name Ester Lederer)
    2) Pauline Phillips (Ann Landers real-life sister, “Popo” Lederer—-

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Landers

    3 Judith Martin (Miss Manners) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Martin

    4 Heloise (Ask Heloise)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heloise_(columnist)

    5 Ruth Westheimer (Dr. Ruth) (Karola Siegel)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Ruth

    6 Carolyn Hax http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolyn_hax

    What do ALL of these women have in common? Its impolite as all hell to mention it, but why do the gals from one little group get to be the advice columnists in newspapers all across this nation because of syndicated newspapers?

    (told you that it would be impolite) Just pointing out something that is true folks…….sorry.

    LikeLike


  35. on May 12, 2009 at 2:06 pm xsplat

    Gig

    After divorce, it is quite possible that the husband won’t have ANY sex life excluding hookers.

    Maybe – but necessity is the mother of invention. He’ll re-invent himself, one way or another, if his T level is high enough. Might take a few decades, but whatever it takes is worth it. Living a life of quiet desparation is not living.

    LikeLike


  36. on May 12, 2009 at 2:07 pm anony

    I would like to see paternity testing mandatory in welfare payments from the state. To qualify for welfare, a girl/woman would need to identify the father, as in, “I know who my baby-daddy be.” NO DADDY, NO MONEY. It could transform the welfare culture.

    LikeLike


  37. on May 12, 2009 at 2:09 pm schoolboy

    Makes me want to just kick a bitch! (wait..Where is kick a bitch??)

    People in general don’t want you too see the truth in anything. In this case it would be questioning marriage and or a womens amoral nature.

    In this case the more you are kept ignorant about this topic, the less of a threat you pose to the established, “shut the fuck up beta, and provide” order that has been going on since the dawn of time.

    I still dont get how this man can’t just go up to his women and say what the fuck is on his mind. How ball-less can a man really be?

    LikeLike


  38. on May 12, 2009 at 2:12 pm maurice

    Agree – paternity test first, then legal action depending on results. Relocate to the state with the most male-friendly paternity/divorce laws efore filing. On that point – question for this group: anyone happen to know which state that is? Nevada?

    Advice columnists will *always* be biased toward the female point of view. Duh.

    LikeLike


  39. on May 12, 2009 at 2:12 pm doug1

    gig

    coldly speaking, divorce hurts woman and child and won’t necessarily benefit the beta.

    What should happen is what happened in this sort of situation in America only a few years ago.

    The cheating woman should get no child support or alimony from the man who’s child it isn’t and who upon learning that doesn’t want to support her. Instead the courts view her conduct (including her deception of her husband for so long about some of such crucial importance, reproduction) with disgust and disdain, and award her very little of her husband’s accumulated savings.

    If anyone is going to have to support her it should be the father of her child, though there too since (presumably) he didn’t provably undertake to do so, the cheating slut and her bastard are on their own.

    This treatment will make this behavior rare again. Instead, while the feminist inspired fairly recently changed family law remains as it is in the Anglosphere, I truly do expect the percentage of cuckolded babies to grow greatly among gen Y there.

    So guys, test paternity at birth. If she doesn’t agree, do it anyway. If you divorce her within a year or two of birth then I think in every state (or certainly the great majority), you wlll not be on the hook for child support.

    LikeLike


  40. on May 12, 2009 at 2:14 pm doug1

    gig–

    BTW, I consider murder fully morally justified in a case such as this, if the divorced wife does go after her hoodwinked ex husband for child support that isn’t his.

    I don’t give a rip how agast lefties and most women will be. Tough. Fully justified.

    That’s not the same as saying it’s the wisest course of action for him, though credible threats along that line probably is.

    LikeLike


  41. on May 12, 2009 at 2:16 pm roissy

    typical female:
    I would like to see paternity testing mandatory in welfare payments from the state.

    i would like to see mandatory paternity testing for every child born. MPT would remove the discomfort of having to make an emotionally charged choice at a sensitive time.
    but the benefit of avoiding 18 years of slavery is worth it.

    To qualify for welfare, a girl/woman would need to identify the father, as in, “I know who my baby-daddy be.” NO DADDY, NO MONEY. It could transform the welfare culture.

    if you’re willing to take that step, there’s no argument you can make against taking the further step of instituting MPT for all births. after all, the cuckold’s money is just as green as the government’s money.
    and just as ill-gotten.

    LikeLike


  42. on May 12, 2009 at 2:18 pm JS

    Two words. Drew. Peterson.

    LikeLike


  43. on May 12, 2009 at 2:19 pm Michael Wears a Hat

    “Roissy calls cheating women female rapists….and yet he won’t codemn the men who sleep with these women. If men would simply stop sleeping with committed women, we wouldn’t have these situations.”

    Because its a man’s job to honor a woman’s commitment?

    The only way we should blame men for a woman failing to honor her vows is if women fundamentally lack self control. If that is the case, they should lose all rights and be put back into the kitchen.

    How do you think they would respond to that?

    No, we live in an era where women lay claim to opportunity and free will. Therefore, when they take that free will and do horrible things with it, we lay the blame at their feet.

    LikeLike


  44. on May 12, 2009 at 2:20 pm anony

    @lurker,

    A woman talking about trust being the foundation to a marriage (typical modern pseudo-intellectual nonsense) is always talking about the man *never questioning* her actions, not the other way around.

    A woman, (me), who talks about trust as the foundation of a marriage can enjoy a long-term marriage. Those who can’t trust will be doomed to loneliness.

    LikeLike


  45. on May 12, 2009 at 2:20 pm johnnymarks

    I had a long debate with a female friend of mine the other day about her sister, who after, being married for less than 1 year, has already cheated.

    While my supposedly (at least in her own eyes) moral friend begrudgingly admits that her sister’s cheating was wrong, she added the caveat that “whatever’s wrong in a marriage is never just one person’s fault.” (Hence, of course, shifting the blame in part to the cheated-upon husband.)

    What followed involved a debate over how best the husband should punish her sister (she didn’t enjoy this very much). At first, I admitted (my own begrudging) respect for the Muslims in Pakistan and elsewhere who throw acid in the face of a cheating woman.

    My friend tried to shame me out of this (perhaps rightly) with the argument that “you can’t punish her for life for a one-time event.” Partial agreement from me. (Her sister is quite beautiful, btw.)

    However, for the cases that Roissy describes, of a woman saddling a man with not only genetic metadeath, but also with 18 years of raising some other man’s progeny, I think the acid-facial too weak a punishment.

    My alternative–and I would love to see some cuckolded bastard do this just once to set an example for all women–would involve tying her upside-down and naked, spread-eagled between two trees (posts, etc).

    Then, the jaded ex would shove a funnel into her cheating cunt, and pour a bottle of professional strength liquid drano into her whore-hole until it rotted out her uterus.

    The best part–especially for v. attractive cheaters like my friend’s sister? She could forever bask in the adoring attention of interested men but could never again receive any sexual fulfillment. Her rotted-out pussy would mirror her rotten heart and justice would be served.

    LikeLike


  46. on May 12, 2009 at 2:21 pm Ovid

    What do you say about bringing back chastity belts?I hear modern updated belts have been brought out somewhere.(I forget where exactly).An ounce of prevention…

    LikeLike


  47. on May 12, 2009 at 2:22 pm gig

    doug

    you just made me remember of a song in portuguese, called “entre a serpente e a estrela” (between the serpent and the star)
    the first verses are like this

    “there is always a shinning knife, whetever love appears
    because no one has a map, for the soul of a woman
    nobody leaves without a bleeding heart, once he tries to uncover
    a marvelous being, between the serpent, and the star”

    I fully agree with your assesment about murder. This is how Western Civilization was built and gained its edge over the rest of the world.

    LikeLike


  48. on May 12, 2009 at 2:24 pm anony

    @roissy ,
    if you’re willing to take that step, there’s no argument you can make against taking the further step of instituting MPT for all births. after all, the cuckold’s money is just as green as the government’s money.

    Big difference. For almost all women, being presumed guilty by the state destroys trust all around. For the welfare mom, finding a genetic daddy is simply a hoop to jump in order to obtain a money gift from the state.

    all analogies are incomplete.

    LikeLike


  49. on May 12, 2009 at 2:25 pm Darth Maul

    Hmmm…Interesting…wonder what the take will be on Ayelet Waldman….she wrote a two page article in the NYT basically saying, in a nutshell, despite their four children, her husband dick her is the center of her life. This focus the characteristics of her husband(as described by her.)

    Here is the article.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/27/fashion/27love.html?pagewanted=1

    LikeLike


  50. on May 12, 2009 at 2:25 pm The G Manifesto

    Roissy is a Troll

    “If men would simply stop sleeping with committed women, we wouldn’t have these situations.”

    That would only happen in a fantasy land.

    It is also not a principle of nature.

    On the other hand, Alphas swooping mad amounts of girls is.

    – MPM

    LikeLike


  51. on May 12, 2009 at 2:29 pm contrarian

    roissy

    Cuckoldry is serious business because it is the female form of rape.

    It isn’t because it cannot be. You might want to consult a dictionary.

    Alpha answer: No.
    Beta answer: No, but I’ll say yes because it’s what’s expected of me.

    This hardly has anything to do with the alpha/beta dichotomy. You may think it’s important that your child is biologically yours, but not everyone does. Personally, I don’t see what difference it makes. Given the choice, I would rather adopt.

    The G Manifesto

    Wow.

    Its stuff like this that makes me realize I am correct (for the millionth time) in never wanting to get married and to swoop mad amounts of fly girls.

    There is really no other option in life.

    Not like I mind.

    I like swooping tons of fly girls.

    Is it possible that you could take your roleplaying nonsense to a more appropriate venue, like, say, World of Warcraft?

    z

    think the state should always award joint custody (kids at one house one week, and the other house the next) IN ALL cases

    Even in cases where one parent is abusive and incompetent?

    LikeLike


  52. on May 12, 2009 at 2:29 pm xsplat

    Gig

    the rbeak up of this marriage hurts two of three certainly and doesn’t necessarily benefit the third. the maintainance benefits two of three and is not necessary a worst outcome for the third.

    there is also the bonus-argument, the hitlerian argument, that the gene pool is improved by more alpha offspring.

    Some people choose to adopt, so not all people consider kids as a gene passing on thing. They see legacy as more familial than paternal.

    But as for what benefits the man? If his being cuckolded is any indication of his alpha or beta status, of who wears the pants in his marriage, then he’s best to get out, at all costs. ALL costs.

    As I said, it’s better to be dead than merely alive.

    LikeLike


  53. on May 12, 2009 at 2:34 pm anony

    I’ll add my comment from another column:

    which has more destructive long-term consequences?
    -the state to undermine trust in it’s women, or
    -a tiny percentage of men to be cuckholded?

    Trust is a fundamental nurturing value to society. Everyone wants to be trusted. Presumption of guilt cuts deep. Imagine how you’d feel toward your state if you were presumed guilty, and had to prove your innocence.

    LikeLike


  54. on May 12, 2009 at 2:34 pm roissy

    gig:
    i’ll be the devil’s advocate here.

    i’ll be the devil.

    given that women that cuckold are not shamed anymore, but rather feel “empowered”, and this kind of behaviour towards betas is unlikely to go away until the mexican-islamic order dawns over America,

    paternity testing is not the same as ushering in an islamic caliphate.

    option 1: he breaks the marriage. She takes part of his income in alimony.

    this is an example of how far basic moral reasoning has fallen among western men. blame no-fault divorce, SWPL suckassery, and parasitic lawyers for this mess.
    if he breaks the marriage over cuckoldry, she does not deserve ONE RED CENT. in fact, ex-wives do not deserve any alimony at all. but that is a subject for another day.

    It will be too much for him, but too few for her.

    not at all. if the divorce industrial complex were dismantled, he could rightfully walk away from his cheating wife and her bastard child scot-free, with zero obligations and a new lease on life.

    The child will get a sub-par infancy.

    so? a real man couldn’t care less if his ex-wife’s child of another man’s seed were to be exposed on a hilltop to hungry vultures.

    the woman can only re-enter the sexual market as a cougar.

    her body, her choice.

    The guy can re-enter, but I don’t see THAT many wounded betas getting an alpha conversion after such a massive cuckold.

    you are confused. even if such an alpha conversion were not forthcoming, the beta would be able to hold his head high that he is not toiling day and night to reward a whore who came multiple times in orgasmic release with another man on his watch.
    he would be released from a veritable prison to at least have the opportunity, if not the guarantee, of finding another woman who hasn’t betrayed him in the worst way imaginable.

    option 2: marriage remains.

    fool.

    Alpha offspring gets the best education possible.

    what good does this do the cuckold?

    Cheating whore remains with EXACTLY the same sexual options she would get after a divorce.

    not quite. she’s a single mom with a kid. that cuts into cougar clubbing right there. and don’t make the mistake of conflating sexual options with commitment options. a ssingle mom could still have some sexual outlet while suffering badly in the commitment market.

    cuckolded beta pays entirely for the child education.

    it’s quite a thing to live in fear, isn’t it?

    And is wiped from the gene pool.

    good for society? maybe.
    good for him? no.

    coldly speaking, divorce hurts woman and child and won’t necessarily benefit the beta.

    wrong. it will benefit the beta in ways he has yet to comprehend.
    if the whore and bastard suffer, well, like i say…
    she should have thought of that before fucking around.

    After divorce, it is quite possible that the husband won’t have ANY sex life excluding hookers.

    at least he gives himself the chance.

    How old is he? how much of his income will he keep after alimony? does he still have friends going out?

    you could say all the same things about the ex-wife. except for one glaring albatross — he doesn’t have to worry about a kid cutting into his funtime.

    people just assume that the cuckolded husband will go from once-a-month-sex to G-manifesto like massive swooping of fly girls.

    sex is not the crux of the issue, gig. slavery to a whore and her ill-conceived child is the issue. he may not get any more sex than he had in marriage (though that is unlikely as a wife who cheats is a wife who isn’t sexing her husband) but he has spared himself the horror of the cuckold’s fate.
    the freedom alone is worth the marginal odds of slightly more frequent sex staying with his whore.

    LikeLike


  55. on May 12, 2009 at 2:34 pm Kick a Bitch

    Writing the fucking harpy now…

    LikeLike


  56. on May 12, 2009 at 2:34 pm Thursday

    artifical wombs

    These will never be much of a factor, because:

    1. For a man, a big part of the thrill of having kids is actually having sex with the said hot woman and essentially colonizing her body for nine months. Getting an attractive woman to bear your children is an accomplishment. Yeah baby!
    2. Much as many of us like kids, really we mostly want the wife to do the day to day stuff.

    LikeLike


  57. on May 12, 2009 at 2:35 pm xsplat

    Anony

    Those who can’t trust will be doomed to loneliness.

    Utter bulshit. Trust has no place in a marriage. Predictability does. You trust her to do what you expect. What she says is irrelevent, entirely.

    Therefore, being a student of human nature, and knowing that all women are deep down devilish whores is essential for any good marriage.

    Trust is for chumps.

    LikeLike


  58. on May 12, 2009 at 2:37 pm doug1

    xsplat–

    They see legacy as more familial than paternal.

    They’re wrong.

    Lots of delusions exist. The delusion about the primacy of culture and environment rather than genetics has a lot to do with the openness to adoption that many people have in the West. That delusion is knowingly perpetuated by the left, much of which knows it’s really at least partly false.

    Myself I’d never agree to adopt. Children are enough of a pain and a burden that at least I’d want a genetic immortality out of it, as well as a cultural imprint.

    LikeLike


  59. on May 12, 2009 at 2:37 pm schoolboy

    johnnymarks,

    I know what you mean.

    One of my family members cheated on her husband. After 21 fucking years of marriage, and 3 kids. When asked,why did you do it?

    …Her response,” It was both of our fault.”

    Bitch please..

    LikeLike


  60. on May 12, 2009 at 2:38 pm zai

    Roissy, you sound like a Good Christian Boy who grew up on a steady hypno-diet on the purity and holiness of monogamy, only to be pushed by reality into the very extremes of misogyny. And I say this as guy who would have slapped sense into the whimpering idiot who asked that question. We, men and women, have always been calculating even if these calculations have been folded into the creases of our subconscious.
    We all live within the protective shade of some delusion; religion, a better life around the corner, love. By letting pretty lies perish, you are standing naked in the bitterly cold winds of depressive realism. And what would you accomplish by that?
    Some of us may be disgusted by the thought of nurturing a blood parasite, but the cost of cuckoldry is only one among the many factors we weigh in a marriage. Marriage itself has been a convenient cultural institution offering social mobility or stability, and steady non-sexual companionship through our entertainment impoverished history.
    A beta’s love for the companionship and cultural status as a married provider may outweigh the cost of the cheating whore he’s married to. Why then must he acknowledge the glaring truth of fake paternity, when he can continue to cocoon himself in his six year delusion? Yes, we can still use paternity testing at the very outset (and when possible, right after fertilization) to influence the reproductive calculations women make. What the vague Carolyn is couching in fuzzy sentences is a reminder to weigh all costs. Some guys can handle the truth, and some like this one need it in gentle sugar-coated doses. We humans have always been calculating whores, conveniently promiscuous in all our relations, but you seem to have realized that a bit late and look at world in the starkest possible tones.

    LikeLike


  61. on May 12, 2009 at 2:39 pm Thursday

    which has more destructive long-term consequences?
    -the state to undermine trust in it’s women, or
    -a tiny percentage of men to be cuckholded?

    There has to be some real basis for that trust. Right now 30-40% of women cheat.

    LikeLike


  62. on May 12, 2009 at 2:39 pm Dr. Grzlickson

    “editor: we’ve got to make you more interesting.”

    Do G-Manifesto and Obsidian too.

    LikeLike


  63. on May 12, 2009 at 2:39 pm doug1

    schoolboy

    …Her response,” It was both of our fault.”

    She’s replaying what she’s learned countless times through our entertainment media.

    In contrast, women rarely if ever say the same thing when their husbands, or the husbands of their friends or family members, cheat.

    Then it’s all or certainly overwhelmingly the man’s fault.

    Think about that from examples known to you. It’s not an exaggeration, is it?

    LikeLike


  64. on May 12, 2009 at 2:39 pm lurker

    Sara I:
    “A woman, (me), who talks about trust as the foundation of a marriage can enjoy a long-term marriage. Those who can’t trust will be doomed to loneliness.”

    –lmao. You mean you beta-whipped your husband while you sleep around? Yes, I’m sure you’re quite happy. Keep telling yourself that.

    Trust in a marriage is SWPL language, invented out of some disney-movie-haze and has no basis in reality.

    Trust, but verify.

    Anony, with no logic”
    “For almost all women, being presumed guilty by the state destroys trust all around.”
    —lmao rofl. Translation: I am afraid of being caught. Only betas trust women; you’ve been lyign to us since the day you were born, there is no trust.

    “For the welfare mom, finding a genetic daddy is simply a hoop to jump in order to obtain a money gift from the state.”
    —not really. most ghetto whores sleep around constantly—its not just a one time mistake (lol, love how feminists still try to make them “the fallen woman.”)

    Having to force a bunch of shiftless bums to take a paternity test—or, goodness forbird, trying to track down the one rapper you were a groupie for for one night and get him to take one—would be onerous task for every welfare queen. The ones who were worthless whores would end up giving up the kids to adoption, which is probably better than living with a skank mom. See: Rorshach.

    LikeLike


  65. on May 12, 2009 at 2:41 pm Kick a Bitch

    My email:

    Carolyn,

    Do the world a favor and check out the following blog about your May 10th article in which you attempted to shame a cuckolded male into raising another man’s DNA.

    http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/washington-post-fembot-tells-cuckold-suck-it-up/

    You are a proponent of male-rape. Shame on you…

    haha…. let’s see is she has the balls to face Roissy-poo.

    and Sara, go gargle some nuts in your mouth please…

    note i said “please”.

    LikeLike


  66. on May 12, 2009 at 2:42 pm Obsidian

    Good post Roissy.

    Mandatory Paternity Testing is inevitable. Nothing can stop it, it is the logical next step from The Pill and Abortion. Think about it.

    Moreover, the Maury Show has made Daddy Testing widespread in its existence and usage; everyone knows the procedure, and a quick look through the phone book or Google reveals numerous locations where it can be done. Additionally, there are indeed home test kits available.

    There should be no time limit imposed on the validity of test, since Women are well known to be excellent concealers; the only thing that matters is whether the test results indicate that so and so is or is NOT the father. Period.

    In the case of unwed mommys who approach the State for funding, no fingering the putative dad so he can be tested, no money; and if no dad can be positively ID genetically as the daddy, again, no money. There are (religious) charities out there who can do the job. A little judgment, lecturing and guilt goes a long way in such circumstances. As do orphanages and adoption when proven that the mommy is incapable of raising her baby on her own.

    In a marriage, proof of cuckoldry is a breach of the marital contract and as such is immediate grounds for divorce, removing any and all chances for the wife to receive any form of settlements, support payments and the like. Until the states reflect this sound reasoning, the Man should take all steps necessary to go off the grid and move his money around into impregnable-pardon the pun-tax shelters. Failing that, he should emply what every captain of every ship does-self destruct-get rid of all money and assets, from giving it away to charities, to literally burning it down to the ground, so as to prevent the whore wife from getting *anything*. Besides, a Man can always rebuild.

    MPT costs can easily be bundled into the hospital bills upon birth, fully refundable to the putative father should they be negative; if a father cannot be found, the mother should pay. In the case of welfare, the properly ID daddy should pay, along w/the usual reimbursments for services rendered. In the event the daddy cannot be found, the mommy should pay, and it be deducted from her wages whenever she gets work.

    The feminist arguments abou what’s in the best interest of the child are easily countered. One need not recount them here, but a simple retelling of the many arguments feminists themselves have used to advance everything from single(mom) parenting by choice to Roe v Wade will suffice. Logic would dictate that the same arguments apply here.

    One final thought. Just as Rape is a test of whether Men will come forward, enmasse, to call their own into account, the question of Paternity Fraud is a test of just how humane Women are; will they remain largely silent, even in the face of overwhelming evidence based on the facts of our age? Or will they fight on in their effort to justify the actions of their sisters? Or wil they be noticeably conspicuous in their relative silence?

    Time will tell. Mandatory Daddy Testing, one way or another, is coming, soon.

    O

    LikeLike


  67. on May 12, 2009 at 2:42 pm Michael Wears a Hat

    “These will never be much of a factor, because:

    1. For a man, a big part of the thrill of having kids is actually having sex with the said hot woman and essentially colonizing her body for nine months. Getting an attractive woman to bear your children is an accomplishment. Yeah baby!
    2. Much as many of us like kids, really we mostly want the wife to do the day to day stuff.”

    If we have artificial wombs, we’ll probably have fairly realistic sex-bots. You aren’t going to combine them into one figure, but it probably wouldn’t matter to most men.

    An artificial womb wouldn’t hurt women much, for the reasons you mention.

    Sex-bots would cause them a lot of problems, but still be manageable in that most beta male providers would still have to settle down with a woman in order to have children.

    Sex-bots and artificial wombs? The bottom would fall out of the beta male provider supply. If the supply of beta male providers drops by even 10%, that would probably have catastrophic affects on the gender power balance, moving from feminism back towards equality or even over to masculism. Women are never going to run out of alpha males willing to fuck them when they are young, but they’re going to find the supply of beta male providers willing to take care of them after 35 suddenly dry up. Shit would hit the fan.

    LikeLike


  68. on May 12, 2009 at 2:43 pm roissy

    piece of shit:
    Big difference.

    no.

    For almost all women, being presumed guilty by the state destroys trust all around.

    if that were the case, there would be no need for marriage contracts.

    For the welfare mom, finding a genetic daddy is simply a hoop to jump in order to obtain a money gift from the state.

    and duping a beta provider chump is simply a hoop to jump in order to obtain a money gift from an individual.
    in both cases, the money gift is an ill-gotten gain.

    all analogies are incomplete.

    your morality is incomplete.

    LikeLike


  69. on May 12, 2009 at 2:44 pm Tood

    I don’t care what anyone says, Cuckolding IS rape, done to men. Even though women may have used my seed to cuckold other men (through the sperm bank), it is BAD, and I don’t want even my own to be used that way.

    This is why I utterly lost all respect for Chic Noir. This ditz had the gall to say that (wait for it)…

    “Women give up so much when they get married”

    (implying that men give up much less).

    This was one of those times when a single sentence from a commenter immediately disqualifies everything else they say, since they have revealed a warped worldview that is so heavily flawed that it is absurd.

    Women give up more than men by getting married….sheesh.

    LikeLike


  70. on May 12, 2009 at 2:44 pm xsplat

    Micheal

    Over the long run, society will be much better off if cuckolding women are ruthlessly shamed and them and their children cut out from the ‘pack’.

    You’ve got it backwards. It’s in societies best interest that the genes of the alphas are widely promoted. Society is based on people, and the best people have the best genes. The alphas tend to have the best genes. All animals know that, including female human animals.

    LikeLike


  71. on May 12, 2009 at 2:44 pm doug1

    Thursday–

    Right now 30-40% of women cheat.

    Which is a huge increase.

    The media want to say it’s all because women are working outside the home far more than previously. Horseshiit.

    It’s primary because: 1) women are no longer generally scorned and treated with contempt for doing it, but rather often sympathy and rarely clearly disapproving judgment. (At least at the left half or even 2/3 of the spectrum.) Judging is bad!!

    2) It’s due to divorce law changes. Women no longer pay a huge divorce property division and child support / alimony diminution for being proven to have cheated, as they did not long ago. This is huge. People often don’t think so. They’re wrong. It’s not a dollars and cents calculation thing. It’s the lack of economic horror stories as object lessons among her girlfriends.

    LikeLike


  72. on May 12, 2009 at 2:45 pm lurker

    anony:

    “which has more destructive long-term consequences?
    -the state to undermine trust in it’s women, or
    -a tiny percentage of men to be cuckholded?”

    —isn’t that just like a SWPLer? Rationalizing cheating and your being a bitch”for the good of everyone?” I feel like I’m in Animal Farm here; men are just Boxer the Horse to these people.

    “Trust is a fundamental nurturing value to society.”
    —lmao. Someone has no idea about history or civilization or how they are formed.

    And if that were true, SWPLer, then you should be against diversity, since it breeds mistrust.

    “Everyone wants to be trusted.”
    —so they can fuck with everyone

    “Presumption of guilt cuts deep.”
    —for a woman, because they are always guilty.

    “Imagine how you’d feel toward your state if you were presumed guilty, and had to prove your innocence.”
    —so pay up for the cable guy’s child, kid!

    Down, down we go….

    LikeLike


  73. on May 12, 2009 at 2:46 pm Thanks

    “What the vague Carolyn is couching in fuzzy sentences is a reminder to weigh all costs. Some guys can handle the truth, and some like this one need it in gentle sugar-coated doses.”

    “gentle, sugar coated doses?”

    i.e when she’s good and ready to tell the man after years of extortion or never at all!

    The Turth shall set you free. A bucket of cold water across the face, a smack across the mouth and a foot up your ass. Stop peddling the modern, therapeutic bullshit, please.

    LikeLike


  74. on May 12, 2009 at 2:47 pm contrarian

    johnnymarks

    At first, I admitted (my own begrudging) respect for the Muslims in Pakistan and elsewhere who throw acid in the face of a cheating woman.

    My alternative–and I would love to see some cuckolded bastard do this just once to set an example for all women–would involve tying her upside-down and naked, spread-eagled between two trees (posts, etc).

    Then, the jaded ex would shove a funnel into her cheating cunt, and pour a bottle of professional strength liquid drano into her whore-hole until it rotted out her uterus.

    I sincerely hope you are hit by a bus as soon as possible, you fucking oxygen thief. I’m guessing you you also give your “begrudging respect” to Muslims who throw acid on the faces of girls and women who dress “immodestly” or go to school.

    I predict that I’ll be the only male here who has anything against johnnymarks’ post. Despite any claims to the contrary they may make, anti-feminists are violently misogynistic and about the only thing preventing them from committing rape or murder is fear of punishment.

    The G Manifesto

    That would only happen in a fantasy land.

    It is also not a principle of nature.

    On the other hand, Alphas swooping mad amounts of girls is.

    You can choose to not get involved with married people. Nature has nothing to do with it.

    LikeLike


  75. on May 12, 2009 at 2:48 pm doug1

    All-

    Actually guys, here’s a test for you. All you who are aspiring to alphadom.

    You’re having a talk with your fiancé about the prenup your lawyer is drawing up.

    **********

    Aspiring to be Alpha: Of course there will be a paternity testing clause, just to set our minds completely at rest. It’s silly, really, but many things are.

    Lovelygoodgirl: Really? For ME? Don’t you trust me? I’m crazy about you. Now I’m upset. That’s horrible. I thought you loved me.

    AA: You know I love you gorgeous. But as a wise man once said, “trust but verify”. Really, it’s nothing. Just a pin prick or even a cotton swab. Routine.

    LGG: But it still means you don’t completely love me.

    Here’s where the having stones or not test comes in:

    AA: Actually sweety, it’s for your benefit more than mine.

    LGG: What do you mean? How?

    AA: Well first of all it will be yet another incentive, beyond all my awesomeness, to not even consider strying when seven year itch time rolls around.

    LGG: That’s stupid. I never would.

    AA: I know hottie, but there’s more. I would save you from me having to kill you, if you did make a horrible mistake. Yeah. I mean if you regretted it but kept it from me, and I found out from medical tests or something when your kid but not mine was six or something. Where you could actually get child support from me under our horrific feminist child support laws. Then I’d have to kill you. And would.

    LGG: [Stunned silence.] You’d really kill me?

    AA: Yes. If you ever did that to me I would. Otherwise I’d protect you with my life.

    ************

    OK, which of you would say that to your intended?

    If not, why not?

    LikeLike


  76. on May 12, 2009 at 2:49 pm anony

    @xsplat,
    interesting that you didn’t address the subsequent loneliness. So, you don’t deny it.

    LikeLike


  77. on May 12, 2009 at 2:51 pm xsplat

    and yet he won’t codemn the men who sleep with these women. If men would simply stop sleeping with committed women, we wouldn’t have these situations.

    And I condemn neither. Neither is “guilty”. I have fucked married women, and will continue to do so. I’ve been cheated on, and expect more off that. It’s neither right nor wrong.

    If I don’t want to be cheated on, then it’s up to ME, and only ME to take steps to avoid that.

    And again – knowing that women are devilish whores is an essential first step in avoiding being cheated on. It is in their nature. Say it ten times, and another ten, and again, until you can face this.

    NO woman is not a cheating devilish whore. Not one.

    It is not condemning a woman to know her nature. It is knowing them.

    LikeLike


  78. on May 12, 2009 at 2:51 pm lurker

    “Mandatory Paternity Testing is inevitable.”

    —O, I’m not so sure.

    Feminists have fought mail order brides, dating teenage girls through age of consent laws and societal “shaming” for dating outside the age bracket for young girls (allowing the girls to develop their manipulative game before being exposed to experienced men and while experiencing innocent men), common sense divorce laws (men always pay), rights over children (abortion, custody), and for affirmative action for women—–think they can’t find some half-assed argument against this that will be pushed down girls throats in the Universities and to the Lesbian Hordes?

    It’s already starting, with this bullshit abut “trust being the foundation of marriage” you’re seeing here and in Hollywood movies. They;ve already got their Jessical Valenti hats on.

    Roissy, mandatory testing would be ideal, and should be required. I fear it won’t come about because of lying bitches like Hax and Sara I and anony.

    LikeLike


  79. on May 12, 2009 at 2:53 pm anony

    @Thursday,
    There has to be some real basis for that trust. Right now 30-40% of women cheat.

    but (to believe the data presented here) only 3% babies have misappropriated paternity. I don’t believe its that high, but will stay with the blog line.

    LikeLike


  80. on May 12, 2009 at 2:53 pm Tood

    Obsidian asked :

    will they remain largely silent, even in the face of overwhelming evidence based on the facts of our age?

    In a word, yes.

    Women are far less constrained my morals, decency, and fairness than men. Women are far more comfortable with gaping hypocrisy.

    This is why feminism failed. It need not have failed, but this is why it did.

    That is why paternal societies are better – as when men hold the cars, they, on average, will treat most women well. When women hold the power, they are guaranteed to abuse it far more widely. Sure, the media fixate on ‘bad men and female victims’, but on balance, when men hold the power, they are more benevolent towards the opposite than when women hold the power.

    Now, a medical question :

    Exactly how is Paternity Testing done? Can’t the father simply take the kid to the hospital, find out for sure, and then plan his course of action over a period of months(hiding/donating/spending assets, quitting his job/moving to a friendly divorce jurisdiction, and then divorce?). Do they test off of blood, or just saliva? If the latter, the father doesn’t even need to take the kid to the hospital.

    LikeLike


  81. on May 12, 2009 at 2:53 pm sara I

    lurker

    Sara I, you bizznich. You take the child our for the afternoon “to give you the day off, honey.” Take it to a doctor in another town that you’ve never seen before and pay cash to him for a genetic test. Get the results mailed to your work/pick up a few days later.

    That’s probably what I would do. Fuck it. I would tell her after the fact. Look honey, I love you, but I don’t trust you, so this is what I did. Sorry! Seriously, if you have suspicions, voice them, act on them, but just DO something…. or stop being suspicious.

    It’s not the end of the world if the kid IS his or is not. Is it? Or is it? No. It’s not. It might FEEL like the end of the world, if she’s not, but eventually he will realize that his wife is only human and flawed at that, just like HE is. Only he’s flawed or delusional in other ways. It’s that ego shattering thing we talked about earlier. Relationships have a way of shattering our egos, if we let them. I’m talking about having a healthy ego; not one that’s too strong or weak.

    LikeLike


  82. on May 12, 2009 at 2:53 pm Anonymous

    Artificial wombs will be a great boon…mostly to gay men and career women who don’t want to bother with the physical hardships of pregnancies. But most men don’t want to have kids by themselves, because kids are a huge amount of work. You will have no time to “swoop” other women, because you will be at home giving your kids baths, checking on homwork, or attending parent-teacher conferences. Most men would rather avoid the day to day drudgery of it all, which is how marriage proably came about in the first place.

    LikeLike


  83. on May 12, 2009 at 2:53 pm lurker

    anony:

    “the subsequent loneliness”
    –of being separated from a cheating whore? that’s why they invented prostitutes.

    Or her lonliness? She’s not lonly. So long as a woman has a man to fret about, she is completely occupied. Betas aren’t frettable.

    LikeLike


  84. on May 12, 2009 at 2:54 pm lurker

    “Look honey, I love you, but I don’t trust you, so this is what I did. Sorry!”

    —Nope. the only time she’d hear about is if the test was positive. Then she gets an earful from my lawyer.

    If not, she gets to be free. For now.

    LikeLike


  85. on May 12, 2009 at 2:54 pm schoolboy

    Doug1:
    “Think about that from examples known to you. It’s not an exaggeration, is it?”

    No, it isn’t.

    On a lighter note, roissy’s minions remind me of the space monkeys in Project Mayhem.

    Its all for the greater good.

    LikeLike


  86. on May 12, 2009 at 2:55 pm xsplat

    Anony, you stupid bitch – wtf are you talking about?

    I haven’t been lonely in years. You don’t have to live in a fantasy land in order to have love and companionship.

    I love imperfect people, not fairy tale Cinderellas and Prince Charmings.

    I hate hate hate with a vengeance and despise good people.

    Hate them.

    Got it?

    LikeLike


  87. on May 12, 2009 at 2:55 pm It's my first day

    contrarian is clearly that TokyoJesusFist clown who was posting here a lot earlier this year but seems to have taken a bit of a hiatus (until now).

    LikeLike


  88. on May 12, 2009 at 2:56 pm Obsidian

    Xsplat,
    The question isn’t who has the best genes; that is irrelevant. The issue, as Roissy has rightly noted, is the *ill gotten gain* the Woman gets from another party, deliberately kept in the dark about the whole thing.

    That is the issue. And that is why MPT can clear the air once and for all.

    No one is trying to prevent a Woman from getting the best genes possible. What we are taking issue with is the way many have gone about it.

    O

    LikeLike


  89. on May 12, 2009 at 2:56 pm David Alexander

    cuckolded beta pays entirely for the child education

    There’s a decent chance that the child might actually love the father. Mind you, that’s the equivalent of offering $25 as replacement when somebody lost $100.

    coldly speaking, divorce hurts woman and child and won’t necessarily benefit the beta. After divorce, it is quite possible that the husband won’t have ANY sex life excluding hookers. How old is he? how much of his income will he keep after alimony? does he still have friends going out?

    Admittedly, that’s the dilemma. I’d certainly understand why a husband would want to divorce after finding out his wife is a cheater who saddled him with a kid that isn’t his, but for all intents and purposes, a mental auditing of what being an “ex-husband” is like may make some men put up with the situation. Yes, game can make him attractive to women after divorce, but it’s not the same as being a twenty-five year old man unencumbered by the repercussions of divorce.

    Fun Question: Would be cheaper and easier to have the guy learn game and use it in his broken marriage, or is it merely too late with his fate as beta provider/platonic friend cemented in the eyes of his wife?

    Why do so many men walk on eggshells with their women? Where’s the damn fear coming from?

    It’s a weird generational effect, IMHO. A lot of guys grew up watching their parents argue, and a lot of them just want to avoid that problem by simply avoiding angering their wives. Thus, the presence of no arguing and doing what your wife wants is the sign of a good marriage.

    LikeLike


  90. on May 12, 2009 at 2:56 pm Tood

    lurker wrote :

    Feminists have fought mail order brides, dating teenage girls through age of consent laws and societal “shaming” for dating outside the age bracket for young girls

    Yes, but they have not been able to shut down strip clubs. This shows that feminists are powerless against the organized desire/will of men.

    The problem is, most men are still too slow-witted to realize the passive, incremental slavery they are being put under. Men even vote less then women.

    There are ‘Tea-Parties’ to protest taxes. Why not the same to protest feminism?

    THAT is the solution. And yes, the movement needs to rope in traditional-values women (Sarah Palin types), AND the Islamic-American community. THEN, action may take place.

    LikeLike


  91. on May 12, 2009 at 2:57 pm Michael Wears a Hat

    xsplat:

    Its only in society’s best interest to promote the genes that benefit the society. Alpha males, as defined by society right now, do NOT have those genes. Unfortunately, our busted-ass civilization promotes men who are stupid, useless, but sufficiently testosterone-laden to tell society to fuck itself as alpha males. Society benefits from promoting genes for intelligence, honesty, and dedication, not stupidity, duplicity, and anti-social behavior, all of which get promoted by the fucked up system right now over those more traditional values.

    What you’re missing out on is that the best genes do not determine alpha-hood in the modern society. Instead, the right combination of genes to display dominance in the current busted system determines alpha-hood. An example of that is the typical snot-nosed rebel thug. In modern society he is rewarded. In pretty much any society prior to todays, the villagers gang up on him and kill his ass.

    LikeLike


  92. on May 12, 2009 at 2:57 pm lurker

    “It’s not the end of the world if the kid IS his or is not. Is it? Or is it? No. It’s not.”
    —lol. Because the womyn’s genetic material has gone on while she raped a man, all is ok.

    ” he will realize that his wife is only human and flawed at that, just like HE is.”
    —lmao rofl. When a man cheats, he’s evil. When a woman cheats, its because she’s human.

    Or a lying filthy whore trying to make him pay and care for a bastard alpha child.

    “It’s that ego shattering thing we talked about earlier.”
    —You mean you preached about while we men, who use logic, ignored you.

    “Relationships have a way of shattering our egos, if we let them.”
    —bastard children shatter bank accounts and genetic material, not to mention time wasted.

    “I’m talking about having a healthy ego; not one that’s too strong or weak.”
    —lol. Women would take being a whore as havign a “healthy ego” and completely ignore facts.

    LikeLike


  93. on May 12, 2009 at 2:59 pm xsplat

    but (to believe the data presented here) only 3% babies have misappropriated paternity.

    I’ve heard that in the U.K. the figure is roughly 11%.

    LikeLike


  94. on May 12, 2009 at 2:59 pm Thanks

    —“Women give up so much when they get married”

    (implying that men give up much less).

    This was one of those times when a single sentence from a commenter immediately disqualifies everything else they say, since they have revealed a warped worldview that is so heavily flawed that it is absurd.

    Women give up more than men by getting married….sheesh.—

    She’s a fucking idiot, so what do you expect? Women, could you know, not get married, but that’s too easy, I suppose. They are always the victim, no matter what. In reality, women seem to be metally deranged to a certain extent, but no shock there. The sooner people figure out that the female mind is a rather unsettled place full of contradictions, the better.

    LikeLike


  95. on May 12, 2009 at 3:01 pm lurker

    I have a Modest Proposal:

    Since women get to murder children without anyone being able to stop them—not even the pruported father—in abortion—

    If a man finds out a child is not his, but had been told it was by the woman or assumed it was because they were married—

    Man gets the right to murder the child at any time before the child turns 18. Not even the mother can stop him.

    Fair is fair.

    LikeLike


  96. on May 12, 2009 at 3:02 pm Thanks

    —“It’s not the end of the world if the kid IS his or is not. Is it? Or is it? No. It’s not. It might FEEL like the end of the world, if she’s not, but eventually he will realize that his wife is only human and flawed at that, just like HE is. Only he’s flawed or delusional in other ways. It’s that ego shattering thing we talked about earlier. Relationships have a way of shattering our egos, if we let them. I’m talking about having a healthy ego; not one that’s too strong or weak.”—

    Heard this one before…We all make mistakes, honey, that’s just the way things are…We’re both to blame….We’re only human, it isn’t the end of the world….

    That’s the sound of fear that the gravy train is coming off the tracks….More effort into CYA!

    LikeLike


  97. on May 12, 2009 at 3:02 pm lurker

    “Women give up more than men by getting married.”

    –She’s right

    They give up having sex with their husband.

    They give up taking care of their disgusting bloated bodies.

    They give up supporting themselves.

    They give up housework (feminism!).

    They give up not cheating on a man.

    They give up letting the man make any decisions.

    They give up not ripping a man’s soul to shreds.

    Why, women give up everything!

    LikeLike


  98. on May 12, 2009 at 3:03 pm Firepower

    women are simply enjoying and prospering from the societal Double Standard set up for them by the diligent work of their fugly predecessors and emasculated Alan Alda Betas

    ‘Baldas’ – i tells ya

    LikeLike


  99. on May 12, 2009 at 3:03 pm xsplat

    Micheal, I’m not sure if women on the whole are not the best judges of the best source of parentage. One would imagine that they would be genetically, not socially, programmed to be adept at this.

    Your criteria may not be evolutions criteria.

    I get your point, but suspect that women also get it, and are highly evolved to make sex-mate choices.

    LikeLike


  100. on May 12, 2009 at 3:04 pm doug1

    Sara–

    That’s probably what I would do. Fuck it. I would tell her after the fact. Look honey, I love you, but I don’t trust you, so this is what I did. Sorry! Seriously, if you have suspicions, voice them, act on them, but just DO something…. or stop being suspicious.

    Yes. Exactly. What I’d do if I didn’t already have an agreement (which I would) and hadn’t gotten her to agree (which would be a huge red flag).

    It’s not the end of the world if the kid IS his or is not. Is it? Or is it? No. It’s not.

    It wouldn’t be the end of the world to me, no. My self esteem would survive just fine. The marriage would not. I will not pay child support for a child that isn’t mine, period, end of story. That’s me.

    BTW, I wouldn’t necessarily leave a wife for her cheating on me to a limited degree, if she stopped completely and truly regretted it, and was desperate to preserve and regain the relationship. (But don’t tell her that.) She’d have to be willing to go through the ringer for quite awhile though, the way virtually all American women put their husbands through it if they cheat, and she doesn’t simply tear the marriage up irrevocably right there (as our culture now greatly pressures wives to do, starting with her girlfriends).

    Now is the world better for having some men that can remain in a cuckolded relationship and raise another man’s child that they were hoodwinked about for an extended period? Maybe so. I won’t be him though. No way no how.

    LikeLike


  101. on May 12, 2009 at 3:05 pm lurker

    Tood:

    “This shows that feminists are powerless against the organized desire/will of men.”
    —Well, for one thing, those enterprises are run by criminal enterprises/shady guys—alphas who if a woman steps up and bitches at them, they smack them down. Prostitution falls into the same category.

    So long as money can be made on the edge of legality, an alpha will make it, fuck the woman.

    To wrap their pretty little heads around it, women try to pretend being s tripper/hooker is somehow a “choice” and “empowering” and not the result of being molested as a child or growing up without a Dad.

    LikeLike


  102. on May 12, 2009 at 3:06 pm xsplat

    Maurice

    Advice columnists will *always* be biased toward the female point of view. Duh.

    Ya, and future Oprah Winfreys will be female. Duh. Advice colums are mostly read by women. It’s the Oprah venue of print.

    LikeLike


  103. on May 12, 2009 at 3:06 pm Tood

    David Alexander asked :

    Would be cheaper and easier to have the guy learn game and use it in his broken marriage,

    Learning Game isn’t THAT easy, and can’t really be done in an emergency time-pressure situation.

    Also, learning Game requires a lot of approaches to other women, to practice on (even for LTR Game). This is hard to do in a marriage.

    The only solution is to FIRST get Game, practice on a lot of women, use Game to persuade a suitable women (in both looks and income) into a pre-nup, then use LTR Game post-marriage.

    Learning Game when you are already drifting into divorce is just not possible.

    LikeLike


  104. on May 12, 2009 at 3:07 pm lurker

    doug1, man up. Once a woman cheats, she will do it again.

    A man sows his wild oats but tires–he will not always cheat.

    A woman will continually be a whore long after she gets any pleasure from it, merely because she enjoys fucking another man over.

    LikeLike


  105. on May 12, 2009 at 3:10 pm roissy

    piece of shit:
    I’ll add my comment from another column:

    braced for illumination, i am.

    which has more destructive long-term consequences?
    -the state to undermine trust in it’s women, or
    -a tiny percentage of men to be cuckholded?

    irrelevant. since i am a believer in individual rights and freedom from slavery, i fall squarely on the side of the angels — that is, the individuals who might suffer the unkindest cut of wifely betrayal.
    that the state may have an interest in keeping cuckolds in the dark about their bastard children and their lifelong slavery to the state via marriage contract does not surprise me in the least.

    Trust is a fundamental nurturing value to society.

    “trust but verify”

    Everyone wants to be trusted.

    especially liars.

    Presumption of guilt cuts deep.

    only if you’re guilty.

    Imagine how you’d feel toward your state if you were presumed guilty, and had to prove your innocence.

    bad analogy. the wife is not required to prove anything. the DNA testing does that for her.

    anony you are a vile piece of shit. a cunt. you have just laid your wretched soul out in all its putrid rot. in so doing, you have earned my illimitable contempt. from this point onward, i will shit down your virtual throat until you are choking on my words in your worst nightmares.

    nighty night, bitch.

    ps i find it funny how all these women are suddenly coming out of the woodwork with faux concern about the loneliness that betas might suffer if they leave a cheating wife for the open market.
    where was that concern when it was needed most?

    LikeLike


  106. on May 12, 2009 at 3:10 pm xsplat

    Obsidian

    The question isn’t who has the best genes; that is irrelevant.

    There you go thinking in terms of right and wrong again. As if what we really need to do, first and foremost, is to assign blame.

    Blame has nothing to do with it. Right and wrong is useless commentary.

    The only thing that matters is pragmatism. What to do.

    Men and women have different agendas. Neither is right, nor wrong. Right and wrong is a linguistic human social concept. The man has an agenda. He can take steps to promote his agenda. Blame and shame can work for him, but on the whole, there is no blame and shame.

    LikeLike


  107. on May 12, 2009 at 3:13 pm Tood

    I won’t be him though. No way no how.

    Indirectly, as taxpayers, we all are, unfortunately. Some women pay taxes too, but income tax is disproportionally paid by men.

    LikeLike


  108. on May 12, 2009 at 3:13 pm Thanks

    —ps i find it funny how all these women are suddenly coming out of the woodwork with faux concern about the loneliness that betas might suffer if they leave a cheating wife for the open market.
    where was that concern when it was needed most?—

    Like I said, the Gravy Train won’t pull into that station anymore. Parasites need a host…

    LikeLike


  109. on May 12, 2009 at 3:14 pm doug1

    xsplat–

    I’ve heard that in the U.K. the figure is roughly 11%.

    There’s lots of misinforation floating around about this. A lot of that stems from lousy population samples.

    Specifically, if one simply surveys paternity testing labs, one is going to get truly alarming but very skewed results. That’s because the overwhelming majority of paternity tests are done in circumstances where the mother and/or purported father are seriously in doubt as to the true paternity. In those cases about 30% of the time the initially named father is not the bio dad.

    In cases of high paternity confidence in the UK and US the numbers for non paternity (cuckolding) have come in around the 3-4% range.

    Some have calculated that the BLENDED percentage might be around 10% — i.e. that could be the percentage of all men claimed by mothers to be the fathers, who are not. (I have no idea how good this estimation is or isn’t.)

    This all comes from GNXP write ups and links from several years ago.

    LikeLike


  110. on May 12, 2009 at 3:18 pm Tood

    with faux concern about the loneliness that betas might suffer if they leave a cheating wife for the open market.
    where was that concern when it was needed most?

    Bingo.

    I think these women are worried that the divorced Beta might learn Game. Remember that the best students of Game are often those who hit excruciating, rock bottom misery in the past.

    I will go so far as to say that SWPL American women are very un-American. They are anti-freedom, pro-slavery, and anti-individual responsibility.

    LikeLike


  111. on May 12, 2009 at 3:20 pm Obsidian

    Lurker,
    Recall the Gipper’s all time best quote: Trust, but Verify.

    Its really that simple, and you can tell if a Woman is really yours just by how she responds to such a suggestion of paternity testing. Both of mine have no problem with it whatsoever, in fact the Nurse offered it just so the record was clear. I didn’t even have to ask her.

    I tell guys all the time, you gotta get a Ride or Die chick. One who’s down with you till the end. And they are out there. Just gotta know what to look for, etc.

    O

    LikeLike


  112. on May 12, 2009 at 3:21 pm doug1

    Tood–

    Indirectly, as taxpayers, we all are, unfortunately.

    I agree. I’m very much in favor of mandatory and automatic paternity testing. If a man then decides to live with and help bring up and support a kid that isn’t his, that’s his decision.

    I’m against welfare for any extended period also.

    Think of how much would change if the default marriage contract enforced by the state was that upon dissolution of marriage no child support would be mandated by the state and each spouse would divide the marital assets in proportion to their earnings.

    Unfair to mothers many will scream. Horrible for children!!!

    Actually, it would lead to far fewer divorces, 70% of which are initiated by women, and nearly all of them in marriages with infants or young children. It would also lead many women to be more careful about who they marry.

    Female infidelity and bearing of other men’s children in marriage would go WAY down. Infidelity used to be way lower in fact.

    Under current law and culture, look for cuckolded babies to go way up soon. The percentages I cited are basically for boomers and to some extent gen x, not gen Y.

    LikeLike


  113. on May 12, 2009 at 3:22 pm Tood

    Artificial wombs will be a great boon

    I hate all this talk about fictitious ‘artificial wombs’.

    Not. Gonna. Happen in the next 25 years.

    It pretty cheap to get a surrogate mother in India or somewhere.

    In terms of anti-feminist technology, the soonest/most likely will be 3-D/VR/Holographic porn with tactile interfaces. A distant second would come sexbots. ‘Artificial wombs’ would be far harder and later.

    LikeLike


  114. on May 12, 2009 at 3:22 pm Michael Wears a Hat

    “Micheal, I’m not sure if women on the whole are not the best judges of the best source of parentage. One would imagine that they would be genetically, not socially, programmed to be adept at this.

    Your criteria may not be evolutions criteria.

    I get your point, but suspect that women also get it, and are highly evolved to make sex-mate choices.”

    You give women a lot more credit than they deserve. Women respond to dominance, pure and simple. In nature, and in MOST societies, that works just fine; the best genes tend to rise to the top, and when an asshole pretends to have top genes and be dominant even though he provides nothing to the society, he gets his ass beat like a bitch. Women who get fooled by “fakers” get ostracized, and they and their bastard children are cast out from the society.

    None of that works any more in our modern feminist, equality-obsessed society. Would even half of the bullshit that black men get away with nowadays be allowed in traditional societies? They’d get shot or lynched or something else. Women who were stupid enough to have children with those men would not find another man, they’d be ostracized. Same for a number of other behaviors: I remember hearing that Britain has the highest crime rate in its history right now, because being a thug is now acceptable there. 18th century Britain, being a thug got you dead. It cuts across all races: being a stupid douchebag is now acceptable because of the restrictions against punishing stupid douchebags. And being a dumb woman who gets a bastard child with a stupid douchebag, while not exactly condoned, does not have the enormous repercussions it had 300 years ago.

    When we took the law and justice away from the people and started punishing people for ‘racism’, ‘sexism’, and any form of protecting their interests through force, we gave the scum of society free reign to do as they wish. Then we proceeded to hurt the men who have something to lose by having children. The men who have the least to lose by fathering bastard children are the men who are too stupid to actually make anything of themselves.

    There are plenty of dominant, valuable males in the world who benefit society very much. The world should be filled with tiny Bill Gates and Richard Bransons, but I would guess that there are thousands of worthless thugs who each have more children than almost any valuable man in the world. How many children does Roissy have? The system is designed right now to punish valuable men for having children.

    LikeLike


  115. on May 12, 2009 at 3:22 pm lurker

    Roissy, excellent.

    Obsidian, that is true, I will always do it, but I don’t think we’ll get it into law.

    LikeLike


  116. on May 12, 2009 at 3:24 pm doug1

    Maurice: Advice columnists will *always* be biased toward the female point of view. Duh.

    Xsplat: Ya, and future Oprah Winfreys will be female. Duh. Advice colums are mostly read by women. It’s the Oprah venue of print.

    Yes, but we should return to a culture where woman are ashamed to say such things to each other, or even a little afraid, if men should be listening in.

    LikeLike


  117. on May 12, 2009 at 3:24 pm vulgarian

    What kind of a fucking idiot gets married in twenty-first century America?

    Sheep get sheared.

    LikeLike


  118. on May 12, 2009 at 3:25 pm xsplat

    Tood

    I will go so far as to say that SWPL American women are very un-American. They are anti-freedom, pro-slavery, and anti-individual responsibility.

    Cosider it as women following a sex biased agenda. Consider it to have always been and to forever remain, as long as we have similar genes as to today.

    All this moral talk is boring. There is no universal morality. There is only agendas.

    LikeLike


  119. on May 12, 2009 at 3:27 pm Tood

    I have noticed that women don’t really mind being exposed as parasites, hypocrites, etc. At least in this day and age.

    Plea to Islamic Leaders : Faster, please.

    LikeLike


  120. on May 12, 2009 at 3:28 pm Howard Roark

    I have a friend whose “father” has a fat little face and black hair, and whose mother is a skinny Irish whelp with scraggly reddish hair. They are divorced. My friend, on the other hand, has piercing blue eyes, a strong jaw and dirty blond hair – one of the best-looking guys I know. I personally believe, with no other evidence, that his father was horribly cuckolded. And maybe the father even knows it, but they never told my friend. Further, the mother is now re-married to a MUCH-older doctor and lives in a palace, works sporadically. Cannot figure out how she has pulled it off all these years. I have a powerful urge to interrogate this woman, but how can I? She has a strange, furtive demeanor, too. Never looks at you when you speak to her. I truly believe she has been living with this filthy little secret for years, and that it weighs on her soul.

    LikeLike


  121. on May 12, 2009 at 3:29 pm lurker

    Yeah, my friend (who is Muslim) told me I’d probably be best off with a Muslim girl, since they’re the only ones who actually keep their morality—even if it is on pain of death. Sadly, the Catholic ones are Catholic in name only.

    Bhetti, my love, are you listening?

    LikeLike


  122. on May 12, 2009 at 3:30 pm xsplat

    Doug

    Yes, but we should return to a culture where woman are ashamed to say such things to each other, or even a little afraid, if men should be listening in.

    I respectully disagree on this point, Doug. Although I understand and commend the valid view. I think men have powers other than blame and shame and morality to use to assure appropriate behaviour from mates.

    Blame and shame and social conditioning are, in my malnourished view, not nearly as strong forces as people assume. Teens fuck and will always fuck, and no social conditioning has ever stopped them from fucking.

    Women will always gossip with other women – not with men. They have their own social powers, indipendent of men. Always have, always will. Makes no never mind. A strong man can own his woman.

    LikeLike


  123. on May 12, 2009 at 3:32 pm xsplat

    Lurker

    Yeah, my friend (who is Muslim) told me I’d probably be best off with a Muslim girl

    That’s a load. My current GF is Muslim. And my other current one is also. Girls are girls are girls are girls are girls.

    LikeLike


  124. on May 12, 2009 at 3:33 pm lurker

    xsplat, perhaps, but growing up in a household can keep a girl straight or loose depending. Catholic girls once weren’t so easy, due to heavy church indoctrination and parental involvement. Currently, Muslim girls are the only ones who have that kind of force upon them

    LikeLike


  125. on May 12, 2009 at 3:37 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    I think it’s more like 10 percent of women who lie about paternity. I wish I could find that stat. I remember seeing it in an article years ago. I would double check the 4 percent figure.

    LikeLike


  126. on May 12, 2009 at 3:37 pm xsplat

    Micheal, I just don’t see this “system” that you are talking about, nor do I see wide differences among traditional, versus modern cultures.

    I’m living in Indonesia, which is about as traditional as you’ll ever find. Women here are extremely materialistic, and highly favor alphas. There is plenty of cheating going on. Plenty.

    I doubt the cultures you dream of have ever or will ever exist.

    LikeLike


  127. on May 12, 2009 at 3:39 pm lurker

    It’s probably 30% of women cheat, but only 5-10% bear a cuckolded child; the others either don’t get pregnant or luckily sleep with their husband and get pregnant by him.

    LikeLike


  128. on May 12, 2009 at 3:40 pm xsplat

    Lurker, the say that overly restrictive parenting makes for overly unrestrictive behaviour in teens.

    There is not and has never been a system that restricts sexual behavior. Sexual behavior can not and has never been restricted.

    The best you can do is to physically keep the women under constant watch. Anything less is hopefull. Nothing but hopefull.

    I don’t care how religious a girl is – I can fuck her.

    LikeLike


  129. on May 12, 2009 at 3:41 pm Tood

    There is plenty of cheating going on. Plenty.

    I agree. In India, there was very little cheating, until the proliferation of :

    1) Cellphones
    2) Internet
    3) Cable TV with soap operas that glorify cheating.

    1) makes it 10 times easier to sneak around relative to when a household shared a single landline. 2) makes it easier to meet people. 3) changes the value system.

    Divorce LAWS in India have not changed yet (there is not asset division or alimony), so divorce rates are low (but rising).

    But there are other screwed up laws. For example, an accusation (even if false) of dowry extortion can get the husband AND his parents tossed into jail, until the court date.

    LikeLike


  130. on May 12, 2009 at 3:44 pm anony

    @Roissy,
    although I enjoy your hypertensive histrionics, I fear it interferes with your comprehension.
    -my concern is for the loneliness of men who can not trust (ie. Roissy’s campfire here), not for betas.
    -I share your contempt of cheating and cuckholding women
    -MPT would presume guilt until proven innocence; a toxic presumption. DNA testing may be easy, but mandating it would destroy trust of women by the state.
    -“trust but verify” really means “no trust” in the context of an intimate long-term commitment.
    -I, and I suspect most women, would support a cuckholded beta to demand recompense for misappropriated paternity.

    LikeLike


  131. on May 12, 2009 at 3:46 pm PA

    MPT would presume guilt until proven innocence

    In many states AIDS tests are mandatory or “highly encouraged” for pregnant women. Does this presume crack-whoredom for every soccer mom with a belly who reports for prenatal care?

    LikeLike


  132. on May 12, 2009 at 3:48 pm johnnymarks

    I forgot one thing in my post about “punishing a cuckolding wife” above.

    The husband has a DUTY to kill the offspring that is not his as part of the punishment to his cheating whore of a wife. (Preferably, committing this action right in front of her.)

    LikeLike


  133. on May 12, 2009 at 3:49 pm Chic noir

    Their marriage would remain strong, or at least viable, as they made arrangements with the hospital to find their true baby and swap kids with the other victimized family who mistakenly got their kid.
    Uh this could present a problem. IIRC, there was a case a few years ago where this very thing happened to a family and one family didn’t want to switch babies. That’s the thing about parents bonding to children. There was also another family who had a child, mother blond, dad haired, their son who had the dark coloring of an Italian or Arab looked less like his parents as he became older. The husband brook up with the wife because she thought she stepped out on him. Come to find out the hospital accidentally gave them a biracial blk baby.

    A man getting cuckolded is the moral equivalent of a woman getting secretly implanted with another woman’s fertilized egg, giving birth to it, and raising it for eighteen years
    I’ve never discussed this with another woman before but something tells me that this won’t bother a woman as much as it would bother a man.

    proof of his paternity might even motivate him to go down on his wife

    WHAT????

    🙄

    That is a husbandly duty, he should need to motivation to do it.
    I guarantee every woman reading this Post article nodded their heads in agreement with the author,
    I beg to differ.

    LikeLike


  134. on May 12, 2009 at 3:51 pm doug1

    Obsidian–

    Mandatory Paternity Testing is inevitable.

    I don’t think it’s inevitable either.

    Instead we’re gonna have to fight for it.

    In the mean time, we need to expect / demand it from any woman we want to have kids with (not to mention if she pulls an ooops).

    LikeLike


  135. on May 12, 2009 at 3:51 pm Dave from Hawaii

    ”trust but verify” really means “no trust” in the context of an intimate long-term commitment.

    No, it means the husband is simply testing whether the trust is well deserved or not. A negative result on a secretly conducted paternity test would only increase a husband’s trust for his wife. A positive result will let him know that the trust was misplaced and she didn’t deserve it in the first place.

    There’s a difference between trust and naivete.

    LikeLike


  136. on May 12, 2009 at 3:51 pm Chic noir

    It could very well be that the husband has seen a few episodes of Maury and has become paranoid. After seeing that show, I find myself looking at children to note any resemblance with its’ parents.

    LikeLike


  137. on May 12, 2009 at 3:52 pm lurker

    anony, lying and cheating like a whore:

    “MPT would presume guilt until proven innocence; a toxic presumption.”
    –when womena re naturally whores, its no different than the blood test already required before marriage in most states.

    “DNA testing may be easy, but mandating it would destroy trust of women by the state.”
    —the state already does not trust straight white males to hire competant women and minorities; it assumes racism.

    the state does not trust men with children or not supporting their wife.

    women who cheat are liars.

    welcome to the club, bitch.

    “I, and I suspect most women, would support a cuckholded beta to demand recompense for misappropriated paternity.”

    –pretty lies. Betas may fall for it, not Roissy.

    And who compensates the man for the time lost? This method saves time and money.

    Any woman who rejects this, gentleman, is a woman who is a whore. Liek anony.

    LikeLike


  138. on May 12, 2009 at 3:53 pm lurker

    johnny makrs, scroll up and see my post on my “Modest Proposal.”

    Or Control F the phrase.

    LikeLike


  139. on May 12, 2009 at 3:55 pm Obsidian

    Anony,
    The procedure is quick, painless and most of all accurate. What’s the problem? Moreover, what about medical concerns? If the child isn’t his, then we have to locate the real father for the sake of the child’s medical wellbeing. To think that Women don’t even consider this, is disgusting to me quite frankly.

    O

    LikeLike


  140. on May 12, 2009 at 3:56 pm johnnymarks

    I agree with Lurker’s Modest Proposal, just calling it a duty rather than an option.

    LikeLike


  141. on May 12, 2009 at 3:56 pm z

    Tood and Anonymous,

    Artifical wombs could be here “WITHIN A DECADE”,
    http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2005-08/artificial-wombs
    All they really are is long-term incubators like we have now. They will be perfected in Japan first (Japanese are ahead in the research), and then sold here. Any laws passed against them here will just ensure men go overseas to have it done.

    It wont be men who will be eager for them to become a reality either. It will be women. Nine months, getting fat, mood swings, stretch marks, cellulite, pain of childbirth., paternity leave……………………….all GONE.

    Anonymous……………..ever heard of maids? Grandmothers? Aunts? Uncles? Plenty of people to help with babies until school starts. Men would be MUCH better off not BEHOLDEN to child support.
    Men could have their two kids, and enjoy a delicatessan of new pussy instead of being stuck married to the same fucking hag who holds a legal lever on them. They’d be assured the kids were theirs and nobody else’s, and could never be taken away by some fuck-assed backdoor-motherfucking court.

    Mandatory Paternity testing, artificial wombs………………..the power structure out there will indeed right itself, and science will indeed lead the way.

    One of you mentioned “sexbots”. I cant concieve of the pleasure of seducing a damned robot myself, but assume that some men could. Artificial wombs (really just long-term incubators like we have now, but better), will give men that option also.

    LikeLike


  142. on May 12, 2009 at 3:56 pm Tood

    Here is an update on Japanese robotics. They have a robotics conference going on right now.

    While the robots described here are not sexbots, always remember that an advancement in any area of robotics can still apply to other areas (or at least speed things up elsewhere). Check out the videos under the ‘multimedia’ heading.

    LikeLike


  143. on May 12, 2009 at 3:58 pm Tood

    Those Japanese researchers……gotta love ’em.

    Extreme Beta/Omega humiliation leads to the most determined scientific research.

    LikeLike


  144. on May 12, 2009 at 3:58 pm doug1

    chic noir–

    someone else: I guarantee every woman reading this Post article nodded their heads in agreement with the author,

    chic: I beg to differ.

    So do you agree with me chic, as several men on here have said they do and none have said they don’t, that if:

    He gets the paternity test done, and the six year old daughter isn’t his; and

    He divorces her and wants to stop supporting the child he was hoodwinked into believing was his, and never undertood to support on the basis that she wasn’t his; and

    the wife nonetheless goes after him for full child support = alimony; THAT

    he then has the moral right to kill her. Stone cold murder her, in that case.

    I would be more than able to kill her under such circumstances, I assure you. Just totally could.

    What say you chic?

    LikeLike


  145. on May 12, 2009 at 3:59 pm Thanks

    “-MPT would presume guilt until proven innocence; a toxic presumption. DNA testing may be easy, but mandating it would destroy trust of women by the state.”

    Negative, it would only cement the bond between 2 committed people even more. And destroy the trust of women by the state? Why does the gov’t always have to be involved? Oh yeah:

    http://www.reason.com/news/show/29035.html

    http://www.reason.com/news/show/28570.html

    Maybe protect some innocent men, but hey, that’s just a nothing issue.

    LikeLike


  146. on May 12, 2009 at 4:00 pm z

    Dave from Hawaii,

    You hit the nail on the head about trust. Exactly.

    LikeLike


  147. on May 12, 2009 at 4:00 pm xsplat

    A bit more, Doug. I do believe that blame and shame are a last resort and usually unnecesary tactics, but agree that they are usefull. I prefer to use seduction and humor over fear. I constantly tease my girlfriends about cheating. Whenever they go out the door I’ll say something like “Don’t fuck anybody. Blow jobs are ok, but no fucking”. I love to roleplay cheating scenarios. Keep the fact that I know and love women – REAL women, not Cinderellas – out in plain sight. And when I said a strong man can own a woman, I meant that he can own her, for a while. How long that while is varies – but unless kids are involved, does how long really matter?

    If kids are involved, you still own her for as long as you own her, and not a day more. And vice versa. So I agree that mate selection and all possible weapons of sugar and vinegar, stick and carrot, are needed. Shame is but one small and weak weapon in the arsenal.

    LikeLike


  148. on May 12, 2009 at 4:02 pm anony

    @pa,
    MPT would presume guilt until proven innocence

    In many states AIDS tests are mandatory or “highly encouraged” for pregnant women. Does this presume crack-whoredom for every soccer mom with a belly who reports for prenatal care?

    Wrong. The presumption behind HIV testing is that – HIV is not diagnosable clinically until end stages, -that HIV is placental transmissible, and -anti retrovirals are effective to reduce transmission. There is no “guilt” presumed in infectious diseases.

    And I agree with chic here,
    A man getting cuckolded is the moral equivalent of a woman getting secretly implanted with another woman’s fertilized egg, giving birth to it, and raising it for eighteen years
    I’ve never discussed this with another woman before but something tells me that this won’t bother a woman as much as it would bother a man.

    I suspect most women would raise and nurture the implanted embryo like her own.

    LikeLike


  149. on May 12, 2009 at 4:03 pm lurker

    The most basic reason women don’t want MPT’s?

    It takes a woman’s most potent weapon in manipulating and controlling men:

    her ability to lie.

    LikeLike


  150. on May 12, 2009 at 4:04 pm biktopia

    “If a man suspects his wife has cuckolded him, the odds of his child not being his rise to 30%. ”

    I can still see no link to pubmed or anything that proves this. unpublished study? from where?

    LikeLike


  151. on May 12, 2009 at 4:06 pm lurker

    anony, please. it is not guilty, it is establishing a legal fact. You’re just worried about burden shifting—that a skanky female might not get her pay from the her bitch boy beta.

    “I suspect most women would raise and nurture the implanted embryo like her own.”
    —lmao rofl. Yes, the kidn caring women of today’s world who slaughter their children at the drop of a hat?

    lol. yeah, right.

    LikeLike


  152. on May 12, 2009 at 4:06 pm cptnapalm

    “MPT would presume guilt until proven innocence”

    And marriage presumes that the kid is the fathers. If you find out that the whorewife spit out a bastard and you are not within about a year of birth to contest paternity, guess what? You have to keep paying up, for 18 years, on threat of imprisonment.

    Women want money. There is no way in hell that they will give up the possibility of soaking any man for their own benefit. Justice is a male virtue.

    They may as well simplify the law to state:

    Any man who the state says is the father, is the father. Upon birth, said man shall be sentenced to 18 years in prison in a jury-less trial. The state will make up an arbitrary amount of money to be paid by said man to the woman who says he is the father of her child. This amount can be changed at any time, for any reason, up to any amount. Should the said man make his arbitrary payments on schedule, for that month he shall be allowed on furlough.

    LikeLike


  153. on May 12, 2009 at 4:06 pm Chuck

    comparing cuckolding to the male version of rape is a bad characterization. its obviously more akin to thievery or robbery, and really, unless the State starts making cuckolded fathers pay for another man’s child (read, his wife’s child, and this wouldn’t be too far-fetched) its really not thievery or robbery at all just disingenuity.

    LikeLike


  154. on May 12, 2009 at 4:06 pm Thanks

    —-The procedure is quick, painless and most of all accurate. What’s the problem? Moreover, what about medical concerns? If the child isn’t his, then we have to locate the real father for the sake of the child’s medical wellbeing.—

    That’s exactly the problem with it, now isn’t it? The real issue is that it is too easy to find out the truth. Goodbye carefully constructed feminist good times being paid for by men’s money.

    LikeLike


  155. on May 12, 2009 at 4:08 pm anony

    @lurker,

    when women are naturally whores, its no different than the blood test already required before marriage in most states.

    You are adorable, lurker, but you are wanting to compare a genetic inheritance with an infectious disease. To my understanding, the “blood test” is for syphilis . an outdated public health strategy.

    LikeLike


  156. on May 12, 2009 at 4:09 pm Dave from Hawaii

    This post is one of Roissy’s best to date…and it’s quite instructive to see just how defensive the sisterhood gets when they close ranks to justify, excuse and/or rationalize cuckoldry.

    Look at anony – while expressing a half-hearted condemnation for cuckoldry (it really is male rape), she is far more concerned with “trust” in a “marriage” that would be “broken” by a paternity test.

    Somehow, I doubt a man that suspects cuckoldry is just being a paranoid making up fantasies in his own mind. Even an extreme beta will have to have a confluence of events and facts in front of him that he cannot dismiss no matter how badly he wants to, for him to connect the dots in his mind that add up to his overall suspicion.

    If you feel like your trust was misplaced, what’s wrong with secretly confirming whether or not that trust was misplaced?

    Women do that sort of shit all the time…like having their friends hit on their men just to see if their man takes the bait.

    LikeLike


  157. on May 12, 2009 at 4:09 pm doug1

    All

    One of the great eternal lies, that’s passed off as women’s wisdom:

    “Women KNOW who the father is; and you should of course (hear must) believe her”.

    LikeLike


  158. on May 12, 2009 at 4:12 pm anony

    @obsidian,
    What’s the problem?

    The problem is the effect it has on the overwhelming majority of women who respect and trust their state. The message is, “we don’t trust your actions.” ” you must prove yourself to the state and to your husband.”

    LikeLike


  159. on May 12, 2009 at 4:15 pm anony

    I agree with Chuck,
    its obviously more akin to thievery or robbery

    LikeLike


  160. on May 12, 2009 at 4:17 pm doug1

    xsplat–

    I prefer to use seduction and humor over fear.

    Of course. By a country mile and then some.

    I do believe that blame and shame are a last resort and usually unnecesary tactics, but agree that they are usefull. *** So I agree that mate selection and all possible weapons of sugar and vinegar, stick and carrot, are needed. Shame is but one small and weak weapon in the arsenal.

    I wasn’t even thinking of shame or fear meted out individually by a man. I was talking about culturally induced shame and fear. Those are POWERFUL social forces.

    They’re weak individual ones usually. Well fear may not be, but that’s a terrible way to maintain a relationship. Don’t even know anything ’bout that.

    LikeLike


  161. on May 12, 2009 at 4:18 pm Too bad

    —The problem is the effect it has on the overwhelming majority of women who respect and trust their state. The message is, “we don’t trust your actions.” ” you must prove yourself to the state and to your husband.”—

    Women are just going to have to accept that and get over their hurt feelings. I had always thought the that modern grrl was supposed to be tougher than that, with all the shit that gets done to guys who get cheated on and forced to pay for kids that aren’t theirs. But a simple, easy test? No, too much to ask. Not a surprising response though.

    LikeLike


  162. on May 12, 2009 at 4:19 pm xsplat

    Anony, you are a stupid selfish little cunt. Your feelings are irrelevant. Suck it up.

    LikeLike


  163. on May 12, 2009 at 4:19 pm Lupo

    “people just assume that the cuckolded husband will go from once-a-month-sex to G-manifesto like massive swooping of fly girls.”

    Are you shitting me? Who fucking cares! Supporting bastard offspring is a fake worse than death. Even if he has one arm and needs a face transplant, he can always get hookers. Hookers are way cheaper than supporting some mongoloid’s kid in return for a biennial handjob.

    Nice work, Roissy. I’ll be writing this hatchet faced witch a love letter.

    LikeLike


  164. on May 12, 2009 at 4:20 pm Dave from Hawaii

    comparing cuckolding to the male version of rape is a bad characterization.

    No, it’s not.

    Why is the rape of a female considered such a horrible crime in the first place?

    Before birth control and legalized abortion, rape was particularly horrifying way of forcing a woman to have a baby from a genetic “donor” she did not want.

    A woman, forced to have a child from the DNA not of her own choosing.

    That is what the crime of rape was really all about.

    So a woman doing the same thing to a man, forcing him to raise a child not of HIS choosing, is certainly a form of rape.

    LikeLike


  165. on May 12, 2009 at 4:21 pm Obsidian

    My brothers, do not be troubled. The End is near. Technology is making it harder to cheat the system, the truth will come out, nothing can stop it. In the meantime, more and more Men wll simply opt out, as they’re doing right now. Women have fought for the right to fend for themselves, they can support the kids they’ve made via their private decisions, either w/or w/o the aid of the true fathers. What matters here is the facts. MPT will get those facts.

    O

    LikeLike


  166. on May 12, 2009 at 4:22 pm compbody

    Here is a link to some of the stats: http://www.canadiancrc.com/Newspaper_Articles/Globe_and_Mail_Moms_Little_secret_14DEC02.aspx

    It is a newspaper, so you might have to dig a little bit deeper to find the original sources of the info.

    Most scientists studying this field say 5-15% of babies are cuckolded.

    In one English classroom 30% of children had different fathers than the were supposed to.

    The American Association of Blood Banks is the source for the quote that 30% of fathers who suspect their children aren’t actually theirs are correct.

    I hope this helps.

    Ben

    LikeLike


  167. on May 12, 2009 at 4:22 pm xsplat

    Doug

    culturally induced shame and fear. Those are POWERFUL social forces.

    I’ve lived in a number of societies. I’ve yet to witness one in which culturally induced shame and fear had much social influence at all.

    People merely get sneakier.

    LikeLike


  168. on May 12, 2009 at 4:23 pm Chic noir

    dave from Hawaii Why is the rape of a female considered such a horrible crime in the first place?
    you must be kidding right???

    *puts hand up to god*

    I refuse I refuse

    LikeLike


  169. on May 12, 2009 at 4:23 pm doug1

    Chuck–

    unless the State starts making cuckolded fathers pay for another man’s child (read, his wife’s child, and this wouldn’t be too far-fetched) its really not thievery or robbery at all just disingenuity.

    You are truly in a bubble. You have a LOT of learning to do lad.

    The state does JUST THAT right now. In some states if the divorcing husband discovers non paternity and divorces within a short time, one and two years have been used by courts in different states, then he can escape paternity. If it’s longer even though through no fault of his own, then he’s on the hook. In many states this hasn’t been judicially determined, but that’s far from meaning a husband such as the one Roissy wrote up would be likely to prevail. Given the other states precedents (and those in Australian and the UK), he probably wouldn’t. It’s all about the best interests of the child (read and mother as an indisoluable unit), with the man coming dead last — and hardly considered.

    Yuup, it’s that bad right now. It really is. Google around and verify. Please. Then report back to us.

    LikeLike


  170. on May 12, 2009 at 4:25 pm Dave from Hawaii

    Not quite, xsplat. Shame and fear don’t stop morally/socially destructive behavior…and yes, people do get sneakier…but when you have a social stigma attached to behavior, you will get a lot less instances of it occurring in the first place.

    Like the rise in single mother households.

    Under the cultural stigma of prior to the 60’s “sexual revolution,” the single mother household was far less prevalent than what we have today when the stigma and shame is all but gone.

    LikeLike


  171. on May 12, 2009 at 4:26 pm Chuck

    Dave:

    “rape was particularly horrifying way of forcing a woman to have a baby from a genetic “donor” she did not want.”

    it was also a particularly horrifying way of forcing an unwanted penis into her vagina against her will…on a much more simple level, it violated her “natural rights” against physical harm and unwanted contact.

    also, if we want to accept your definition of male rape as being forced to raise a child; there is no “force” per se. she lied and manipulated, both horrible in their own right, but there is no “force”. a cuckolded man who raises a child does so on his own accord, whether knowledgable about the paternity of his child or not.

    you guys can’t just make up a whole new definition of rape.

    LikeLike


  172. on May 12, 2009 at 4:27 pm lurker

    anony, being anony:

    “but you are wanting to compare a genetic inheritance with an infectious disease.”
    —Actually, its quite an apt comparison. Your whorish little offspring that you foister upon some poor beta for sustenance are the festering germs of society, parasites that feed off of the world just as their mother does, without contributing anything.

    “To my understanding, the “blood test” is for syphilis.”
    —which you probably have

    “an outdated public health strategy.”
    —like assuming the married man is the father.

    It was put best above: if you want the ring, and get guaranteed payments for the kid, then man up and submit to the testing. Tit for tat. But women don’t understand that.

    LikeLike


  173. on May 12, 2009 at 4:28 pm doug1

    chic noir:

    dave from Hawaii: Why is the rape of a female considered such a horrible crime in the first place?

    chic: you must be kidding right???

    When no child results, and when compared to a situation where a wife deceives a husband into believing a child is his when it’s not, and then sues him for child support (which in NY will extend to her college education) when he divorces her,

    I completely agree with Dave. In fact I think mere rape (with no resulting child) is NOTHING in comparison to that.

    LikeLike


  174. on May 12, 2009 at 4:28 pm Dave from Hawaii

    Chic, I’m speaking of the historical context of rape.

    Aside from that, you women have been conditioned by society to consider rape a fate worse than death. Sorry dear, but there are worse things one can endure than simply rape.

    Just as you females recoil in visceral horror at the thought of a man you do not desire violating you, so too do men recoil in visceral horror at the thought of another man impregnating the woman he THOUGHT he was starting his own family with.

    Cuckoldry IS rape…not in they physical sense, but in the mental sense, it most certainly is.

    LikeLike


  175. on May 12, 2009 at 4:29 pm tunacanman

    “biannual handjobs”

    you had me rofl at that, and I was about to say this was a legendary post, but it just kept getting better and better.

    Write the book already, or the screenplay for “alpha in the city”
    roflmao

    LikeLike


  176. on May 12, 2009 at 4:29 pm Stupid Links Each Time

    Chic noir
    dave from Hawaii Why is the rape of a female considered such a horrible crime in the first place?
    you must be kidding right???

    *puts hand up to god*

    I refuse I refuse

    Go be offended somewhere else, please.

    LikeLike


  177. on May 12, 2009 at 4:29 pm Tood

    I would not kill her or the innocent child, but I would :

    1) Get the test done. Twice, to make sure.
    2) Start an asset relocation/donation/spending spree plan
    3) Move to a place where divorce is more favorable (even if this means quitting my job). Try to make an excuse about how I have a job there, so that she is not suspicious (although this is the risky part of my plan, which is why part 1) is a buffer).
    4) File for divorce there.
    5) Eventually inform the child what happened and give him/her a copy of the report (if he is old enough).

    LikeLike


  178. on May 12, 2009 at 4:31 pm tunacanman

    oh and a serious point, if DNA test proves the cuckoldry… where/when is the law ascribing criminal charges and damages for the biznitch for:
    willful fraud,
    intentional mental anguish, and
    theft (garnish those wages for them expenses honey)

    Think the day will ever come when female rape gets persecuted too?

    LikeLike


  179. on May 12, 2009 at 4:32 pm xsplat

    Dave

    Under the cultural stigma of prior to the 60’s “sexual revolution,” the single mother household was far less prevalent than what we have today when the stigma and shame is all but gone.

    Correlation or causation? Birth control is the cause, not social mores. Social mores changed BECAUSE of birth control. Social mores didn’t affect the behaviour. Social mores are mere stories people tell themselves to justify whatever it is that they are currently doing.

    LikeLike


  180. on May 12, 2009 at 4:32 pm Tood

    Question :

    If you do the DNA test and find that the child was not yours, and then file for divorce…

    …what is to prevent the woman from bribing a doctor to give her a fake test, so that she can get child support from the man?

    Sure, you have your report, and can sue the doctor, but still…..

    LikeLike


  181. on May 12, 2009 at 4:32 pm lurker

    Chuck, the emotional and financial damage inflicted on a man from being cuckholded is equal to rape. Try for equality is playing the feminine game; there is no equality between the sexes.

    As any feminazi will tell you, “rape is about power.” So is cuckholding; it is power over a man’s livlihood.

    Or, put it another way: a woman’s value, first and foremost, is her sexuality: she’s attractive but not slutty, not had too many partners. When she lost that, it was a huge losss, thus why rape was such a bad crime; it deprived her of ehr natural advantages. In ancient Rome, there was no crime for raping a prostitute, precisely because such women had nothing to lose by it.

    For a man, his financial success has long been a big ticket to status and women. When he voluntarily gives up women in marriage, and then loses not only that one woman but also his money for both her and another man’s seed—-that is societal rape.

    LikeLike


  182. on May 12, 2009 at 4:32 pm anony

    @too bad,
    Women are just going to have to accept that and get over their hurt feelings. I had always thought the that modern grrl was supposed to be tougher than that, with all the shit that gets done to guys who get cheated on and forced to pay for kids that aren’t theirs. But a simple, easy test? No, too much to ask. Not a surprising response though.

    OKay, you appealed to a “tough girl” challenge. I don’t know where the “cuckold pays for the bastard child for ever” started. This is beyond the pale injustice. I suspect that most women would support legislation to stop that.
    Agree that a cheek swab seems simple enough technically, but the message from the state to women is “you are not to be trusted.” and then women should respect their state?

    LikeLike


  183. on May 12, 2009 at 4:33 pm Tood

    Chuck = SWPL Beta.

    Anyway, this is someone who thinks Mao and Stalin were not left-wing, so judge his words accordingly.

    LikeLike


  184. on May 12, 2009 at 4:34 pm Chic noir

    @doug- the paternity test should take place at time of birth before the father is allowed to sign the birth certificate.
    Forgive me for being a little testy about this but I’ve been saying this once a week for almost a year now. Getting the DNA test done early prevents any messy bonding between a man and a child that’s not his. If the man chooses to stay, then it’s his decision but he should be given the facts and the truth.

    fun fact: I also think a women should have their fiancés take lie detector tests before they marry. It would save alot of money for both parties. Females won’t hitch themselves to trash for the long-term.

    Do know that if someone cheats on you and you forgive with ease, he/she will probably do it again. The quicker you make up, the sooner he/she will be face down in new poon/pean.

    PS. Some of those couples we see on Maury are in fact not couples. They are just two poor people who want a trip to NYC in a five star hotel. Their dignity, morals and ethics, if they have any, take a back seat for the opportunity to leave their project, trailer park, or shack for a few minutes of peace.

    LikeLike


  185. on May 12, 2009 at 4:34 pm Obsidian

    I too am noting w/great interest the cringing at the very notion of MPT among our lady members, a most telling sign, yes? Afterall, again, the test is painless, easy and accurate. Why would any Woman who’s on the level cringe from it being administered? Shouldn’t it put to bed, once and for all, any questions in the matter? If the interests of the child is what truly matters, isn’t knowing the truth in said child’s best interests?

    O

    LikeLike


  186. on May 12, 2009 at 4:36 pm lurker

    P.S. free advice: many states calculate alimony and child support on the basis of how much you’ve earned or expect to earn over the last or next 3 years. So its best to investigate that amount and downsize your pay accordingly—take a nonprofit/social worker job, sell the house for a smaller shack and rent, etc. Claim to the cheating whore you want to give back. Then, when the time period is up, divorce her and go back to a better career. Many places won’t adjust alimony/child support even if your income zooms up.

    LikeLike


  187. on May 12, 2009 at 4:36 pm Chuck

    doug1:

    with all due respect, if you read my comment i state that its entirely possible that our government would have no qualms about forcing a cuckolded man to pay for children, but if you have the sources to support that claim (the one you claim i’m naive about) then you should provide those links.

    as far as male rape, people in this country are “forced” to pay for other people’s children all the time, it’s called welfare and CHIPS and other such programs. should we start calling that “rape” or better yet “male rape” since men pay the majority of taxes?

    i’m just trying to tamp down the hyperbole around this issue that’s all, i agree with the roissy’s sentiment and POV. men are getting screwed, but when we start playing the victim card, crying that our gender is being raped, i wonder how long it is before our “masculinity movement” turns into a slightly higher T-leveled feminist movement, complete with shirllness.

    LikeLike


  188. on May 12, 2009 at 4:36 pm Chic noir

    Stupid Links Each Time

    How nice that you click on my links. I feel honoured.

    Go be offended somewhere else, please.
    you say this now but if something was to happen to any of your female family members, you would feel otherwise.

    LikeLike


  189. on May 12, 2009 at 4:37 pm Tood

    Do women reading this know what the penalty for adultery (let alone cuckolding) under Islam is?

    While I do not agree with the severity of Islamic punishments, it nonetheless is pretty easy for Western men to merely stop fighting against Islam’s agenda of domination, and just step aside.

    Let’s step aside, so that there is only air between Muslims and feminists/Perez Hilton.

    LikeLike


  190. on May 12, 2009 at 4:38 pm Chic noir

    Obsidian
    I too am noting w/great interest the cringing at the very notion of MPT among our lady members, a most telling sign, yes

    Not all of us. IIRC, Elizabeth, your love lost Mu 🙂 and possibly hello had no problems with MPT.

    LikeLike


  191. on May 12, 2009 at 4:38 pm Why you can’t trust a doctor « The Complete Body

    […] abomination is not the doctors’ fault because the politicans and judges set the rules and stupid advice columnists don’t care.  While I hate politicians more than doctors, the government’s actions do not excuse the […]

    LikeLike


  192. on May 12, 2009 at 4:38 pm lurker

    “I suspect that most women would support legislation to stop that.”

    –anony, lying will get you no where.

    I distinctly remember that cunt Leeza Gibbons having an entire show (when she ahd her talk show in the 90s) where she tried to make the case that men who discovered they weren’t the father *had a moral obligation* to not only pay, but raise the child.

    But it was through that show that I learned that Harry, Prince Charles and Diana’s 2nd son, is probably not his. Diana was rumored to be having an affair at the time with her military bodyguard…who looks exactly like Harry (red, curly hair, freckles, while Charles is dark).

    And Leeza claimed Prince Charles would be *bad* for casting the wretch off.

    LikeLike


  193. on May 12, 2009 at 4:40 pm Too bad

    —“Agree that a cheek swab seems simple enough technically, but the message from the state to women is “you are not to be trusted.” and then women should respect their state?”—

    We use the breathalizer, don’t we? What’s the message there? Or the fact that my taxes get deducted automatically. Or that to own a firearm I have to submit to a background test. Whining about a test that may make women not “trust” thr gov’t is bullshit. You’re just upset the easy money will stop.

    I get it. Women trust that the state will financially rape men. Can’t have that “trust” broken now can we? Toughen the fuck up.

    LikeLike


  194. on May 12, 2009 at 4:41 pm Tood

    Obsidian wrote :

    I too am noting w/great interest the cringing at the very notion of MPT among our lady members, a most telling sign, yes?

    One correction in that sentence. They are ‘ladies’ no more. Not after this.

    lurker wrote :

    So its best to investigate that amount and downsize your pay accordingly—take a nonprofit/social worker job, sell the house for a smaller shack and rent, etc.

    Even better, do a startup, that too in a place where laws will be in your favor (emerging economy, etc.). That way, it does not look like you are faking it. You are simply being an entrepreneur, who is drawing no salary while you build your company.

    Divorce in the meantime.

    LikeLike


  195. on May 12, 2009 at 4:41 pm lurker

    The anony argument against MPT’s as a requirement for children reminds me of shakespeare:

    *Methinks the lady doth protest too much.*

    LikeLike


  196. on May 12, 2009 at 4:44 pm anony

    @Dave,
    I’m agreeing with this , and have discussed it with other women who’ve agreed.
    “Aside from that, you women have been conditioned by society to consider rape a fate worse than death. Sorry dear, but there are worse things one can endure than simply rape.

    I had a roommate who was raped by a man she met at a bar. She recovered fast, but did get the satisfaction of contributing to his court verdict. Court cases are rare, but i suspect, contribute to some satisfaction. My point is that not all women would consider rape worse than death. The public voices are those who skew toward elevating its heinousness. Voices like my old roommate don’t get heard because she recovers and moves on to flirting in bars with guys again.

    LikeLike


  197. on May 12, 2009 at 4:44 pm Chic noir

    @doug- You do known that sometimes men are raped as well as molested as children. Men who have been raped are as troubled about it as women. Some people never get over it. That feeling that someone took something from you that wasn’t theirs to take. Someone that is such a part of your being human and possibly exposing you to diseases and pregnancy.

    The fact that a few men are throwing around rape with ease makes me wonder whose really reading this blog?

    LikeLike


  198. on May 12, 2009 at 4:45 pm Stupid Links Each Time

    —How nice that you click on my links. I feel honoured.

    Go be offended somewhere else, please.
    you say this now but if something was to happen to any of your female family members, you would feel otherwise.—

    Nope, just rolled over them. And I don’t care about your bullshit family member claims about rape. Whine, bitch, moan, suffer, etc… Heard it all before. Feel free to peddle your shit as usual, it ain’t my website to police.

    LikeLike


  199. on May 12, 2009 at 4:45 pm JAM

    Doug1

    > OK, which of you would say that to your intended?

    I’ve essentially done all of that… but not the prenup. From what I’ve gathered about Ontario law, the prenup is essentially useless once children enter the picture (and we intend to start our large family fairly soon after we marry).

    I have screened my fiancee heavily for things in addition to physical attractiveness, and she stacks up very well with the social indicators (good family, *very* low number of boyfriends, fairly religious, spontaneous demonstrations of love, alpha father I respect, etc). I have LTR game. She will be earning a large fraction of what I make (thanks Tood).

    Anyone else have any advice on the matter? I figured it wasn’t worth the potential emotional damage if the agreement would be invalidated in a couple years anyways.

    I did tell her about the paternity testing and punishment for infidelity (which will be the same that many here have advocated for cuckoldry, lol), though.

    LikeLike


  200. on May 12, 2009 at 4:46 pm gig

    Roissy

    We all agree on the plain evil of divorce laws.

    What I see is the trade-off between:
    – life working for the benefit of a whore who give him occasional sex, fullfills the social roles of a wife (i.e, he can still go to those events where only couples go) and a bastard who may love him in old age
    – sexless life, still paying , but paying less, for the whore/bastard, possibly lonely in old age, and impoverishment of the whore/bastard.

    with a good dose of self-denial, which the guy has already shown, the first option is quite viable

    What I don’t see is how the break-up of this individual marriage will help dismantle the divorce industry. It can only happen through a revolution, like MPT/sexbots or the Caliphate. Obviously the Caliphate implies a lower standard of living, to say the least.

    LikeLike


  201. on May 12, 2009 at 4:47 pm anony

    @lurker,
    The anony argument against MPT’s as a requirement for children reminds me of shakespeare:

    *Methinks the lady doth protest too much.*

    what’s “too much” lurker? MPT would be an egregious slap at almost all women. We don’t want to be treated with such distrust and lack of respect.

    LikeLike


  202. on May 12, 2009 at 4:47 pm Chuck

    Toad:

    “…what is to prevent the woman from bribing a doctor to give her a fake test, so that she can get child support from the man?”

    Nothing is preventing her from doing this, but HAS THAT EVER HAPPENED? you can think up all the shitty what-if scenarios you want, but this discussion is one of trends and patterns and possibility, not the realm of outliers and freak occurences.

    “Chuck = SWPL Beta.”

    OK. if you think so Toad.

    “Anyway, this is someone who thinks Mao and Stalin were not left-wing, so judge his words accordingly.”

    No, dick nose, i said hitler was not left-wing. mao and stalin had strictly socialistic desires that culminated in totalitarian regimes. hitler was almost stricly nationalist, xenophobic, and for racial purity, all traits common to the right-wing extremist topic of our previous discussion.

    If you read at all on the subject, right-wing and left-wing, when they enter their extreme phases often have over-lapping ideologies and goals for their nations. Perhaps they have conservative or liberal viewpoints in their fledgling years, but by the time they reach full-blown dictator status, there is very little difference in their ruling styles; its all about control, control, control.

    LikeLike


  203. on May 12, 2009 at 4:47 pm Chic noir

    stupid links time
    Nope, just rolled over them
    WOw just wow.
    😦

    LikeLike


  204. on May 12, 2009 at 4:48 pm xsplat

    Lurker

    And Leeza claimed Prince Charles would be *bad* for casting the wretch off.

    When creditors used to call me, leaving a voice message that they had a “very important situation to discuss”, I always mentally responded with “Important to whom?”

    It’s the same for morals. Important to whom?

    There are no universal morals. Men and women have different agendas. Grow up.

    LikeLike


  205. on May 12, 2009 at 4:49 pm lurker

    anony, speaking lies to the truth:

    “what’s “too much” lurker?”
    —-at all, anony.

    “MPT would be an egregious slap at almost all women.”
    —only to the sluts like you.

    “We don’t want to be treated with such distrust and lack of respect.”
    —then don’t get married or demand child support.

    LikeLike


  206. on May 12, 2009 at 4:50 pm lurker

    anyone else up for bringing back people suing cheating wives for “breach of contract”?

    LikeLike


  207. on May 12, 2009 at 4:51 pm Chic noir

    @anoy and dave- what’s the point of chatting up a ten in the bar when you can just follow her home and take it from her? Who needs game when you have brawn.

    Personally, anoy, being rapped troubles me a heck of lot more than having to take a MPT. I would smile as I’m having my mouth swabbed because I would know without a doubt who the father of my kid is.

    LikeLike


  208. on May 12, 2009 at 4:53 pm lurker

    xsplat:

    “There are no universal morals.”

    —there are. Men discern justice, women discern convenience. For themselves. Always has been, always will be.

    This is why most religions prevent women from being religious leaders—they are incapable of looking for good or truth; it is the antithesis of their nature.

    Its also why men gravitate to the hard sciences and math; women can’t handle cold logic, rational thinking, or answers that can’t be massaged into what they want.

    LikeLike


  209. on May 12, 2009 at 4:53 pm 691

    Robin Hanson blogged this on Overcoming Bias, asking:

    “Is there any other common betrayal situation where neutral third parties would so strongly advise not looking to see if you’ve been betrayed? I can’t think of one.”

    http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/05/ignoring-betrayal.html

    LikeLike


  210. on May 12, 2009 at 4:53 pm Chic noir

    xsplat- claimed Prince Charles would be *bad* for casting the wretch off

    harry looks an awful lot like Princess Di’s brother. He has the same red hair and tall lanky build.

    Fun Fact: Harry is a red head Mandingo. He’s packing at least 9 and as thick as a polish sausage.

    LikeLike


  211. on May 12, 2009 at 4:54 pm schoolboy

    “The fact that a few men are throwing around rape with ease makes me wonder whose really reading this blog?”

    Chic don’t act like your some divine saint here.

    LikeLike


  212. on May 12, 2009 at 4:54 pm Dave from Hawaii

    You do known that sometimes men are raped as well as molested as children. Men who have been raped are as troubled about it as women. Some people never get over it. That feeling that someone took something from you that wasn’t theirs to take. Someone that is such a part of your being human and possibly exposing you to diseases and pregnancy.

    The fact that a few men are throwing around rape with ease makes me wonder whose really reading this blog?

    No, you’re merely seeing the script flipped here, and as a female, you don’t like it one bit. To your femi-centric way of thinking, the horror of a rape that some people never get over is a thought that cringes your female soul.

    Well, my dear, how long do you think it takes a man who discovers his wife’s cuckoldry to get over that particular mind-fuck?

    What about the numerous court cases that involve judges ENFORCING cuckoldry because the “father” and the child have already “bonded?” That the ‘Best interests of the child’ were served?

    It’s not that we men here are trivializing rape. We’re merely comparing it to an equally disgusting and horrifying crime.

    You say there’s no comparison. I say that you women, and a few SWPL-libtards are simply throwing around cuckoldry with ease.

    LikeLike


  213. on May 12, 2009 at 4:55 pm Chuck

    Toad:

    “Do women reading this know what the penalty for adultery (let alone cuckolding) under Islam is?

    You’re going to call me SWPL beta for questioning the definition of the term “male rape”, and in the next breath tout the virtues of Islam? I’ll take “male rape” over Islamic rule any day.

    “While I do not agree with the severity of Islamic punishments, ”

    then why bring it up?

    LikeLike


  214. on May 12, 2009 at 4:56 pm Chic noir

    schoolboy- believe it or not, there are plenty of women who don’t lay about with multiple men at the same time.

    LikeLike


  215. on May 12, 2009 at 4:56 pm doug1

    chic–

    fun fact: I also think a women should have their fiancés take lie detector tests before they marry. It would save alot of money for both parties. Females won’t hitch themselves to trash for the long-term.

    I think girls in America today would be far more reluctant, as a group, to allow this than men.

    E.g.: “How many sexual partners have you had? Have you ever had sex outside a relationship? Really, you’ve never been fooled? How many times have you let that (rephrase, has that) happened? What’s the shortest time after meeting a man that you’ve had sex with him? Tell me about each man you have fallen in love with. How deep were your feelings at the time?”

    I’d answer all these questions no problem (and have) despite large numbers because I’m not hiding that. Marriage minded women, if they have more than small and committed ones, almost always are, at least to a large extent.

    Yes it’s a double standard. It should be. I celebrate it.

    BTW, there are ways of getting truth out of girls on these things. It’s best done early, before she falls in love with you and knows your true feelings re: girls you’d considering committing to.

    LikeLike


  216. on May 12, 2009 at 4:56 pm femalemisogynist

    I agree, but I did have one thought: the strategy this bimbo suggests would be a good and workable strategy for a woman who suspects she’s being cheated on. It’s possible that she’s giving this cuckold the advice she’d give another woman. No doubt she’s too clueless to realize why it doesn’t work that way.

    LikeLike


  217. on May 12, 2009 at 4:57 pm Thursday

    Most women don’t realize how absolutely horrific cuckoldry is for a man. I can’t speak for every guy out there, but for me I would much rather be sent to prison and anally raped than have my wife cheat on me and bear another man’s child.

    LikeLike


  218. on May 12, 2009 at 4:59 pm Chic noir

    Dave from Hawaii- If MPT are done at time of birth, this will stop such occurrences.

    What about the numerous court cases that involve judges ENFORCING cuckoldry because the “father” and the child have already “bonded?” That the ‘Best interests of the child’ were served?

    bullshit, the father should be reimbursed for any monies he spent on a child that was not his.

    LikeLike


  219. on May 12, 2009 at 5:02 pm doug1

    Tood–

    I would not kill her or the innocent child,

    It never even occurred to me to kill the child.

    As well I’d simply leave her rather than kill her, if that could be the end of that.

    It’s when she then moves to make me pay her lots of my accumlated savings when the marriage ended because of her deepest possible deception in lying about he paternity of her child, and even wants ongoing support of that bastard that’s not mine …

    Then and only then do I start to have thoughts of murdering her.

    And feel totally morally justified in having them.

    I’d sure as hell feel it more than alright to credibly threaten to kill her if she doesn’t totally drop the child support suit.

    LikeLike


  220. on May 12, 2009 at 5:03 pm twiceaday

    “I agree. In India, there was very little cheating, until the proliferation of :

    1) Cellphones
    2) Internet
    3) Cable TV with soap operas that glorify cheating.”

    This is patently absurd. There has always been plenty of cheating in India (and every other country on the planet), just as there has always been plenty of premarital sex (perhaps not in India or other places where couples were often wed before puberty, but that’s beside the point). I’m not sure why this simple truth is so hard for some to grasp.

    LikeLike


  221. on May 12, 2009 at 5:03 pm lurker

    Chic, being chic:

    “harry looks an awful lot like Princess Di’s brother. He has the same red hair and tall lanky build.”
    —and the bodyguard she slept with.

    “Harry is a red head Mandingo. He’s packing at least 9 and as thick as a polish sausage.”
    —-and you know this how? Chuck is all ears.

    LikeLike


  222. on May 12, 2009 at 5:03 pm 691

    As for mandatory paternity testing, I’m only cautiously optimistic it will be widely adopted. I forsee some innocuous law requiring both parents to consent to such a medical procedure.

    My friend in the Marines described their attitude to war as:
    If you get in a fight in a bar, most people will try to act tough, maybe through a punch. A Marine will smile, wait for you to turn around, then grab your head and smash your face into the bar.

    That’s the alpha attitude you need to take. When you find out, put on a good face for a while, get the legal papers ready, then buy her a trip to the spa for the weekend to get her out of the house and while she’s gone, move all of your stuff out of the house into locked storage, give the key to your lawyer then slam her with the divorce papers sunday night when she gets back and then go out, get drunk with the boys and fuck some other chick. That’s how you have to roll.

    LikeLike


  223. on May 12, 2009 at 5:04 pm Chic noir

    thursday Most women don’t realize how absolutely horrific cuckoldry is for a man. I can’t speak for every guy out there, but for me I would much rather be sent to prison and anally raped than have my wife cheat on me and bear another man’s child.

    😯

    Wow thursday and that’s considering that prison ain’t the easiest place to surive even if your not raped.

    something tells me you may change your mind after coming across this guy.

    LikeLike


  224. on May 12, 2009 at 5:06 pm Chic noir

    @lurker there are pics all over the net. Prez hilton puts pics of Harry being Harry up often.

    LikeLike


  225. on May 12, 2009 at 5:07 pm Chic noir

    twiceaday- It’s because it’s right in our faces now and to an extent, celebrated.

    LikeLike


  226. on May 12, 2009 at 5:08 pm Piglet

    I’m a strong anti-cuckoldry man, but I must respectfully dissent from Thursday’s view. Anal rape in prison seems worse to me. (Don’t you watch Oz? ;-p )

    LikeLike


  227. on May 12, 2009 at 5:08 pm Dave from Hawaii

    If MPT are done at time of birth, this will stop such occurrences.

    Yeah…but what does this have to do with our debate about the equivalence between rape and cuckoldry? This is the exact sort of deflection you regularly do here that draws roissy’s ire.

    You were trying to argue that there is no comparison between a female being raped and cuckoldry, and when I rebut, you resort to this? Where did I say I was against MPT at birth? I’m all for that.

    bullshit, the father should be reimbursed for any monies he spent on a child that was not his.

    This is not what happens frequently…

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=child+support+not+father&btnG=Search&cts=1242162516881

    LikeLike


  228. on May 12, 2009 at 5:08 pm biktopia

    Carolyn Faux.
    She is a prototype of the girl that would stretch anything to her benefit,
    I hope everybody here can see through the lies of those that believe in them themselves…

    LikeLike


  229. on May 12, 2009 at 5:08 pm Obsidian

    I think that the dicussion surrounding rape is very interesting. Insofar as I am concerned, it is a crime where a person is sexually violated against their will. Commonly this is associated w/Women as victims, although as Chic has rightly noted, kids and even other Men can and have been raped.

    Chuck’s disagreement with the use of the word “rape” within the context of Paternity Rape is also interesting. He suggests instead that it is more akin to fraud, robbery and thievery. I don’t disagree w/this view. However, in light of the grave implications involved, from an evolutionary and genetic point of view, coupled with wilful deception and indeed theft, I must respectfully disagree w/Chuck, someone whom I usually enjoy reading and often agree with. Let me be clear: the very nature of Cuckoldry is indeed a form of rape, if, we accept that rape is the violation of another’s body on sexual grounds. Here, a Man is violated on sexual grounds-he is led to believe that he is investing time, emotions and resources/money into a child he believes is his own but very well may not be, and the child is the product of sexual actions taken on the part of his wife and another Man, yet he’s led to believe his own sexual acts have brought the child about.

    Moreover, in many ways, given the coercive nature of many courts etc, I would strongly argue that Cuckoldry is inherently worse than the garden variety female rape, in that the cuckold has to continue supporting a child he knows is not his own for years, and all that comes w/it in emotion and mental health terms. That Women in the main are nonplussed by this, is again, most telling.

    If Chic is reading along, I do not recall Liz or Hello making such statements, and in any event are not here now to speak for themselves; what we do know is that the current Women in the room seem to have opted for fighting tooth and nail against a simple, painless and astonishingly accurate test to put everyone’s mind at ease. Fascinating.

    O

    LikeLike


  230. on May 12, 2009 at 5:10 pm lurker

    Prison rape has been exaggerated by the last 20 years of movies and TV shows (think Oz) about prison. Mostly, the shows depict gay male (and closeted men’s ) fantasies about having sex with a straight man or being “forced” to do so, so its “not really their fault.”

    It’s every gay man’s fanatasy to have a macho straight virgin, just like straight men like the idea of having an innocent Catholic school teenage virgin.

    At this point, I think the movies have affected reality—life imitating art—but most people who talk about prison say the same thing: its mostly just veyr boring, intespersed with bouts of violence.

    LikeLike


  231. on May 12, 2009 at 5:11 pm Marcus Aureliette

    I too am noting w/great interest the cringing at the very notion of MPT among our lady members, a most telling sign, yes?

    Not all. I support it wholeheartedly. I actually think that making it mandatory takes away the honey-don’t-you-trust-me?! aspect of it: just lump it in with all the other millions of tests done throughout pregnancy/post-pregnancy, and let the chips fall where they may. No individual guy will have to request it, nor deal with the relationship brouhaha that such a request would likely cause.

    If you haven’t done anything dishonest, you have nothing to worry about.

    LikeLike


  232. on May 12, 2009 at 5:12 pm lurker

    Chic, have you heard of stuffing?

    I’m not lookign up Harry nude, btw. Give me a news story.

    And Perez Hilton? that faggy lying bitch? Citing him just put your whole argument in doubt.

    LikeLike


  233. on May 12, 2009 at 5:13 pm Chuck

    “Harry is a red head Mandingo. He’s packing at least 9 and as thick as a polish sausage.”

    Yes, its a well-known fact that redheads pack more heat than non redheads. It’s likely evolutionary, making up for our hair color.

    LikeLike


  234. on May 12, 2009 at 5:16 pm lurker

    On a tangential note, a both sad and happy day for me was when I found out most porn stars aren’t as hung as the movies claim.

    1) smaller women (many porn girls are undersized)

    2) no accurate measuring system (who will verify claims? the U.S Census)

    3) shaving balls (looks longer)

    4) camera tricks

    5) claims based on anecdotal evidence only—porn girls willing to lie for co-stars (or for cash and coke).

    For every guy, knock off at least 1.5 inches of their claim. Probably the biggest in reality is 9 inches, which only Holmes/Steele can pull off.

    LikeLike


  235. on May 12, 2009 at 5:16 pm Tood

    ” I’m not sure why this simple truth is so hard for some to grasp.”

    er… because you are wrong.

    Today, in Saudi Arabia, very few women are having pre-marital sex (outside of certain specialized circles).

    This was true in India as well, until recently. They were virgins at marriage, and cheating was just very hard to logistically execute, and too risky if caught. Period.

    Sure, you know more about it than people who actually lived there.

    LikeLike


  236. on May 12, 2009 at 5:16 pm schoolboy

    “schoolboy- believe it or not, there are plenty of women who don’t lay about with multiple men at the same time.”

    and you are exempt from this “gangbang” how?

    LikeLike


  237. on May 12, 2009 at 5:17 pm Chic noir

    Piglet
    I’m a strong anti-cuckoldry man, but I must respectfully dissent from Thursday’s view. Anal rape in prison seems worse to me. (Don’t you watch Oz? ;-p )
    Piglet, season 1 Alabese rapped the young Italian mobster. That poor man was never the same. They couldn’t get him to talk or anything, he just sat in bed looking at the ceiling all day.

    I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that OZ was as good as the wire.

    @chuck- the emo pete weitnz(tp) was a shocker too. Who would have thought that such a sensitive boy could be so manly.

    LikeLike


  238. on May 12, 2009 at 5:18 pm lurker

    To wit: Asia Carrera, the famous porn star with the high IQ (and possibly the murderer of her husband, whose brakes got cut mysteriously close to the time she took out an insurance policy on him) stated that she would not work with a man over 8 inches.

    yet her roster of guys all looked very large on screen, even in the pre-internet days. As big as the guys claiming 9-10 inches now.

    LikeLike


  239. on May 12, 2009 at 5:19 pm lurker

    Chic, you do understand the difference between fiction and reality, right?:

    “Piglet, season 1 Alabese rapped the young Italian mobster. That poor man was never the same. They couldn’t get him to talk or anything, he just sat in bed looking at the ceiling all day.”

    —its FICTION, chic. Not real.

    LikeLike


  240. on May 12, 2009 at 5:20 pm gig

    691

    that’s the correct attitude. A guy who would take those attitudes is right to divorce. But the spineless beta, this one would never follow what you say.

    The guys who would follow your advice, or doug’s (murder) are the guys who would be benefited from divorce.

    LikeLike


  241. on May 12, 2009 at 5:20 pm doug1

    twiceaday–

    There has always been plenty of cheating in India (and every other country on the planet), just as there has always been plenty of premarital sex (perhaps not in India or other places where couples were often wed before puberty, but that’s beside the point). I’m not sure why this simple truth is so hard for some to grasp.

    Numbers matter.

    Losey goosey concepts and thinking such as “there’s always been this and always been that” don’t. That’s worth crap.

    The percentage of women who cheat during marriage has gone WAY up in Anglosphere countries at least.

    If you think the fact that married women are no longer scorned for cheating on their husband as they used to be absent truly compelling circumstances, but widely sympathised with or at least treated with an “I won’t judge” attitude, hasn’t had a huge impact, you’re deluded. (Examples of the sort of compelling circumstances that used to be thought necessary before many would not judge a cheating wife harshly are: endemic and for years continued cruelty, or total and complete neglect despite concerted and extensive efforts long continued by her, combined with utter refusal to allow a divorce.)

    If you think the fact that women used to be severely punished economically in divorce if they could be proven to have cheated has not had a LARGE effect, you’re a moron.

    Feminism has caused both these changes. Feminism is directly responsible for the greatly increasing percentage of cheating wives, and the greatly increased percentage of divorce since feminism really took hold at the end of the 1960’s in some parts of society, and all over in the 1970’s.

    LikeLike


  242. on May 12, 2009 at 5:21 pm lurker

    doug1, don’t forget the twin heads of the pill and abortion. They probably have encouraged it as much as feminazism.

    LikeLike


  243. on May 12, 2009 at 5:22 pm Tood

    Oooooh. Bitchy little Chucky is getting prissy..

    1) Mao and Stalin were LEFT-wing. No hemming and hawing, they were left-wing, period.

    2) Hitler was left-wing. I showed you proof. You did not like it, so you ignored it.

    Chuck = SWPL Beta.

    LikeLike


  244. on May 12, 2009 at 5:26 pm doug1

    Marcus Aureliette

    No individual guy will have to request it, nor deal with the relationship brouhaha that such a request would likely cause.

    I welcome the opportunity to brass out and request/demand it as a condition of getting married. See my script on that in the comments above.

    Any woman that wouldn’t easily agree, I don’t want to stay with.

    LikeLike


  245. on May 12, 2009 at 5:26 pm lurker

    Chuck, by a strict definition, Hitler was left wing. He sought greater convernmental control over economic and social policies. Simply because he hated on non-whites instead of white males does not make his system any less left wing.

    Left wing groups all seek blaming some sub-group for problems and use government to reduce that group; these are always the richer groups. Commies killed lots of Jews and others, because they were wealthy; the Nazis blamed the Jews for the Weimer’s failures and non-Jewish poverty, so they killed.

    Nazis were avowed socialists. TThatw as the name of their party.

    LikeLike


  246. on May 12, 2009 at 5:26 pm Chic noir

    Dave from Hawaii,

    Oh I know it doesn’t frequently happen but if I had my way, that’s the way things would be. if you are apart of the menz movement, it’s something you should be working on along with mpt. If I was a guy I wouldn’t sign a birth certificate until a DNA test proved the kid was mine.

    The crazy thing is, if women waited a simple three weeks before moving on to a new partner, the need for dna tests would decrease sharply.Just three short weeks Dave.

    I don’t agree with screwing up the lives of innocent children. Women need to think long and hard about who they have children with. There is too much birthcontrol available for so many women to become single parents.

    lurkerwhich only Holmes/Steele can pull off.
    lexington steele hurts his costars. Mr. Marcus puts it down. His costars really enjoy themeselves sometimes. Cuba was very popular in his day too. Some stars would make a request to work with him.

    mu Commonly this is associated w/Women as victims, although as Chic has rightly noted, kids and even other Men can and have been raped.

    Yea that sick itch from Cali comes to mind. Had she not killed the little girl, I wonder how/if the little girl would have gone on to live a normal life.

    LikeLike


  247. on May 12, 2009 at 5:29 pm doug1

    anony–

    I agree with Chuck,

    Chuck: its obviously more akin to thievery or robbery

    You would.

    No, it’s more like rape. Or a regularly scheduled home invasion at gun point, once a month, for 21 years.

    A single instance of rape without issue sounds better.

    Despite all the female propaganda and hysteria about their special issues, and extraordinary lack of concern for exclusively male ones.

    LikeLike


  248. on May 12, 2009 at 5:30 pm lurker

    Another way of looking at is that there is a sharp split in left wign ideology: fascists, while seeking governmental control voer economic and social policies, seek to keep nations separate from others (see Franco’s isolationism), and think that their socio-fascisitic policies will enable success of their nation over others. In other words, they are economically and socially socialistic but in terms of foreign policy they do not seek to break down borders but build them up; meat for us, not for you. Depend on each one another to beat the other.

    socialist-Commies seek to unite the economic and social strata of all people every where; no nations. meat for all. But commies avow that they cannot practice communism so long as one person holds out; therefore, socialism is only a short-term solution.

    LikeLike


  249. on May 12, 2009 at 5:30 pm xsplat

    Doug

    Feminism has caused both these changes. Feminism is directly responsible for the greatly increasing percentage of cheating wives, and the greatly increased percentage of divorce since feminism really took hold at the end of the 1960’s in some parts of society, and all over in the 1970’s.

    There is little to no feminism in Asia, yet the trends are the same.

    I see the causes as financial independence, and birth control.

    All these social causes are the stories we tell ourselves.

    A woman will fuck around if she can. Period. Social shaming does not stop women – a lack of options does. Give a woman options, she will take them. Period.

    LikeLike


  250. on May 12, 2009 at 5:31 pm Chic noir

    lurker its FICTION, chic. Not real.

    yes it was but a very powerful piece of fiction. Remember Passion of the Christ was fictiona and the actor playing Jesus was not killed. That didn’t stop audience members from having heart attacks,asema attacks,crying, and fist fights amongst themselves.

    Even thought it’s TV&fiction, it can still play with our emotions.

    Chic, have you heard of stuffing?

    I’m not lookign up Harry nude, btw
    You meen he sliced it down the middle and stuffed something inside of it?
    naw, I don’t think Harry would so such a thing cause it ain’t that serious.

    LikeLike


  251. on May 12, 2009 at 5:31 pm Comment_Whatever

    It doesn’t matter if the kid isn’t yours. There are rules, accidentally made up for situations like this, that JUST HAPPEN, by accident, to make the husband pay. The judge screaming about your ‘contempt of court’, the police pressing a gun in your face, the screaming ‘be reasonable’ guy ‘friends’ you have, don’t like it, but they sure as hell are going to enforce it. Fully.

    http://www.menshealth.com/cda/article.do?site=MensHealth&channel=guy.wisdom&category=family.guy&conitem=4a096f83c9821110VgnVCM10000013281eac____

    Your solution to the situation is simple. Liquidate all you can, run up every credit card, and then leave the country. If you secretly tested, then your ‘wife’ will have NO IDEA that you are preparing to leave. Take a month, take two, learn a foreign language. You have a time. Then, she’ll come home and you won’t be there.

    The ONLY states that will give you, as a worthless cockolded man, justice are:
    Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Maine, Mississippi, Ohio, Virginia, and Wisconsin

    Notice, that is only 10 out of 50 states.

    LikeLike


  252. on May 12, 2009 at 5:31 pm Too bad

    C’mon doug1, where’s your sense of trust?

    LikeLike


  253. on May 12, 2009 at 5:33 pm lurker

    Chuck:
    “yes it was but a very powerful piece of fiction. Remember Passion of the Christ was fictiona and the actor playing Jesus was not killed. That didn’t stop audience members from having heart attacks,asema attacks,crying, and fist fights amongst themselves. ”
    —um, Chuck? Non sequitor. Chic was arguing that the rape in the movie showed how rape happened or affected people in real life prison situations. It is fictional. Its affect on the audience was not at issue.

    LikeLike


  254. on May 12, 2009 at 5:35 pm Stan

    The irony is strong in this post, the man who stands to benefit most from cuckoldry is lamenting the female amoral creature.

    Yet more proof that the only honest men in this world are alphas.

    LikeLike


  255. on May 12, 2009 at 5:35 pm lurker

    an even simpler way to think of the fascist/commie divide is this:

    Fascist desire to put all the systems of socio-communism into place except 1) destruction of national sovreignty and 2) destruction of class.

    LikeLike


  256. on May 12, 2009 at 5:35 pm Markku

    Myself I’d never agree to adopt. Children are enough of a pain and a burden that at least I’d want a genetic immortality out of it, as well as a cultural imprint.

    I’m sorry to be somewhat rude but I’ve run into this falsehood enough times here. Genetic immortality is completely illusory. You would realize this if you had any inkling of the basic facts of the genetics of sexual reproduction. In the long run, by reproducing you only make a tiny difference in allele frequencies in your gene pool. Your degree of relatedness to your direct descendents is cut in half every generation. Your great-great-great-great-grandchildren might as well be complete strangers, genetically speaking.

    The real value of having genetic children is in having the opportunity to see familiar traits develop in them. From the point of view of an extended family such as an ethnic group with relatively crisp genetic boundaries, it makes little difference who precisely does the reproducing so long as no important traits are signifigantly over-represented among those who have children.

    If you want real immortality, get with the transhumanist program already. Choose to work in some of the relevant fields of science and technology.

    LikeLike


  257. on May 12, 2009 at 5:36 pm Dave from Hawaii

    lurker – you’re attributing chic’s argument to chuck…but that’s okay, it’s not like theirs a substantive difference between the two.

    One is a chic, and the other thinks like a chic.

    LikeLike


  258. on May 12, 2009 at 5:38 pm lurker

    Chic:

    “Mr. Marcus puts it down.”

    —proof?

    “Cuba was very popular in his day too. Some stars would make a request to work with him. ”
    —again, proof? Porn whores will say anything—these are people pretending to be in love/lust with the pizza guy! Show me some data.

    LikeLike


  259. on May 12, 2009 at 5:38 pm lurker

    sorry, thanks Dave. names are similar, sometiems I read too fast

    LikeLike


  260. on May 12, 2009 at 5:38 pm kim

    Wouldn’t mandatory paternity testing hurt both men and women though? If a women does have a baby with someone who isn’t her husband (shame, etc. etc.), then that means that she’d probably hold the father responsible for child support ($$$$), right? If this actually came to fruition, does that mean that men would be more cautious about sleeping around too?

    LikeLike


  261. on May 12, 2009 at 5:39 pm Tupac Chopra

    lurker:

    Yeah, my friend (who is Muslim) told me I’d probably be best off with a Muslim girl, since they’re the only ones who actually keep their morality—even if it is on pain of death. Sadly, the Catholic ones are Catholic in name only.

    Now see here, young man. Please refrain from speaking of my Clio in that manner. She’s not one of those trollops.

    LikeLike


  262. on May 12, 2009 at 5:40 pm doug1

    Obsidian-

    Moreover, in many ways, given the coercive nature of many courts etc, I would strongly argue that Cuckoldry is inherently worse than the garden variety female rape, in that the cuckold has to continue supporting a child he knows is not his own for years, and all that comes w/it in emotion and mental health terms. That Women in the main are nonplussed by this, is again, most telling.

    Exactly.

    It goes on, and on, and on, and on.

    LikeLike


  263. on May 12, 2009 at 5:41 pm aliasclio

    For those who are wondering about Prince Harry’s father, google “Prince Harry”, “James Hewitt”, “Charles, Earl Spencer”, and “Prince Charles”. Then tell us whether you’re still so certain that Hewitt has to be Harry’s father.

    First, Hewitt looks quite a bit like Lord Spencer. Second, Harry looks more like Lord Spencer than like Hewitt. Third, Harry has his father’s narrow, slightly too-close-together eyes, though he’s better-looking than either of his parents.

    Clio

    p.s. The reason compulsory paternity testing won’t ever be imposed (I think), is that it isn’t in the state’s interest to impose it. What if the baby turned out not to be related to his “legal” father but his mother couldn’t or wouldn’t name the biological father? Or the biological father refused to be tested? The state would then be stuck with the child-support costs.

    I don’t think that any of this is fair to men, mind you. I’d stop it if I could do so by fiat, and I would definitely tell that Post columnist to take a hike. In fact, I will do so, just to prove that I do in fact support men in this situation.

    LikeLike


  264. on May 12, 2009 at 5:42 pm lurker

    porn chicks have 4 concerns in mind:

    1) how much will I get paid?

    2) will there be any coke?

    3) how famous will I be (fuck you dad!)

    4) again, how much will I get paid?

    Barring that, they’ll sleep with anyone who doesn’t tear up their vagina and doesn’t smell or otherwise hurt their earning power. This is why many refuse interracial, because it can hurt a girl’s earning power—a niche market can turn off the bigger market.

    Porn shotos last hours, not the 20 minutes a scene works, so the girl never orgasms, or if she does, its early on and she’s then being rubbed raw. Porn girls just want a guy that can stay hard, isn’t ugly (ron jeremy), and treats them acceptably.

    LikeLike


  265. on May 12, 2009 at 5:43 pm lurker

    “does that mean that men would be more cautious about sleeping around too”

    -Male pill. Vasectomy. End scene.

    LikeLike


  266. on May 12, 2009 at 5:45 pm doug1

    kim–

    Wouldn’t mandatory paternity testing hurt both men and women though? If a women does have a baby with someone who isn’t her husband (shame, etc. etc.), then that means that she’d probably hold the father responsible for child support ($$$$), right? If this actually came to fruition, does that mean that men would be more cautious about sleeping around too?

    I don’t think careless sluts should get any child support. You know, like in days of yore. A few decades ago. (After all, all of the seven or eight common methods of birth control are within their sole control and knowledge. And women have always been the ones to regulate when the sex act occurs, or doesn’t — and still are.)

    Guess what, since they started to be able to, and were no longer called sluts and whores, and their issue bastards, but rather unfortunate single mothers, their number has EXPLODED. Funny that, what?

    LikeLike


  267. on May 12, 2009 at 5:47 pm lurker

    sorry, clio, but he loooks like hewitt. An dit would be natural that two lighter red-headed genese would result in a more redheaded child. its science.

    LikeLike


  268. on May 12, 2009 at 5:47 pm Chic noir

    Since we are on this whole child support and MPT theme. Let me add this gem. Don’t for any reason give your sperm to a single woman or two lesbians who want to have a child. I don’t care if they’re your childhood friends, like a sister or any of that other BS, don’t do it I don’t care how many papers you sign and/or you assemble your own version of a dream team.

    Men have been cuckoled this way too. I read a story about two lesbians who got a guy to give them some juice and they turned around & sui they guy for child support. Can you imagine how stupid that guys feels??? He didn’t even get a chance to taste/feel the walls yet he has got to dish out his loot. If you gotta pay and least have a chance to play.

    LikeLike


  269. on May 12, 2009 at 5:47 pm lurker

    meanwhile, this is Diana’s brother:

    LikeLike


  270. on May 12, 2009 at 5:47 pm doug1

    Lurker–

    A vasectomy is like a woman having her tubes tied. It must be assumed to be, and usually is (esp. after a number of years) permanent.

    Valved vasectomies on the other hand are very interesting. They’re in clinical trial in Australia. I think perhaps India as well.

    LikeLike


  271. on May 12, 2009 at 5:48 pm Tood

    The reason compulsory paternity testing won’t ever be imposed (I think), is that it isn’t in the state’s interest to impose it.

    Yep. Just like marriage is bad for the state, since two single people pay more in total taxes than a married couple.

    But paternity testing need not be compulsory. All a man has to do is get a Q-tip and go get it done, secretly.

    LikeLike


  272. on May 12, 2009 at 5:49 pm cptnapalm

    To Chuck:

    Canada: http://thescottross.blogspot.com/2009/01/man-has-to-pay-child-support-for.html

    Notice the sex of the judge.

    U.S.: http://lawvibe.com/dna-proves-not-biological-father-but-forced-to-pay-child-support/

    No hope here, 7-0.

    There are cases where a boy who was a victim of statutory rape was ordered to pay up, one where the cuckolded husband had to send child support payments to the guy that was fucking his wife and more.

    Anyhow, you asked for citations on men ordered to pay child support for kids that are not theirs and so here a couple are.

    LikeLike


  273. on May 12, 2009 at 5:49 pm Chic noir

    FYI, the pill is there. You just need a company to make and distribute it. It’s been around for a few years now. People in the medical community think no men will take it so that ‘s why they are having problems getting in on the market. Men who are apart of the men’s movement, get working on this.

    LikeLike


  274. on May 12, 2009 at 5:50 pm Tood

    don’t do it I don’t care how many papers you sign and/or you assemble your own version of a dream team.

    That is why one donates to a bank, where you don’t know who the recipient is, and they can’t find out who you are, until the kid is 18 and chooses to contact you.

    Of course, most men don’t have this option.

    LikeLike


  275. on May 12, 2009 at 5:52 pm lurker

    I wouldn’t take it (let the woman fuck up her body if she wants); I bring my own condoms and use them. and I insist on paternity tests.

    But then again, most women in NYC don’t want to trap me into being a father and are on the pill. NYC 22 year olds are like that ;).

    LikeLike


  276. on May 12, 2009 at 5:52 pm kim

    doug1,

    I don’t think careless sluts should get child support either, and chances are that if mandatory paternity testing was made legal, that the amount of careless sluts would go down making everyone more monogamous…including males (not by choice but because women would be scared to sleep around), no?

    LikeLike


  277. on May 12, 2009 at 5:53 pm Chic noir

    clio First, Hewitt looks quite a bit like Lord Spencer. Second, Harry looks more like Lord Spencer than like Hewitt. Third, Harry has his father’s narrow, slightly too-close-together eyes, though he’s better-looking than either of his parents

    yea, I agree with you. Harry’s eyes look more like Prince Charles and he has the coloring of his uncle.

    LikeLike


  278. on May 12, 2009 at 5:54 pm xsplat

    Guess what, since they started to be able to, and were no longer called sluts and whores, and their issue bastards, but rather unfortunate single mothers, their number has EXPLODED. Funny that, what?

    Taiwan is also experiencing profound cultural changes, and many men get their wives from the mainland. It seems that if women become financially independent, they tend to become in many other ways independent. I guess you can call that “feminist”.

    The root of the reasons for Taiwanese women opting to not be good wives is financial, and related to birth control. Give a woman options…

    I see and see it and see it. There is no culture that is stronger than the economic and materialistic forces around it. If women have access to well paying jobs and birth control, they are free to fuck around as much as they like.

    LikeLike


  279. on May 12, 2009 at 5:57 pm Chic noir

    @lurker- you can a few of mr. Marcus movie’s for yourself as well as reading about Cuba. Some stars are rougher than others and have a sort of hatred for their female costars mandingo being one of them and westly pipes being another. saw something with bella donna and rocko and was complety turned off. something ain’t right with bella donna, I don’t care what no one says. there is freaky and then there is sick.

    LikeLike


  280. on May 12, 2009 at 5:58 pm Chic noir

    lurker bring my own condoms and use them.
    better take it with you and I hope it doesn’t break. It would be smatter to double up.

    LikeLike


  281. on May 12, 2009 at 6:00 pm Obsidian

    On another note, it might come as a surprise that Women call virtually all of the shots in the straight Porn world; very few males can ascend into “stardom” unless they go the Gay Porn route, and many have done just that, including Peter North and Byron Long. In fact, its widely speculated that most male porn stars one sees in the movies have done at least some Gay Porn first. Barring that, the only other way to break into the business is to either be a rarified Alpha Male who can get it up, keep it hard and cum on cue while also having mad charisma that makes the ladies keep coming back for more, or, form your own porn company. This is what TT Boy has done, a Man who was nearly blacklisted outta Porn on the grounds that a number of Women didn’t want to work with him. His Evasive Angles has become a force to be reckoned with and he calls all his own shots.

    As for the size issues, I’m not surprised that there’s not much truth in advertising in Porn, lol. This happens with big bust porn stars as well, playing around w/their bra cup size and the like. And, again, we have to remember-most Women don’t particularly care for a Mandingo/Lexington Steele type of endowment, as Chic noted, that can be quite painful for most Women. The Size Queens of the world are almost all Gay and Male. Very few Women are into that sort of thing.

    Most of the Sisters I’ve spoken with report they tend to favor Mr. Marcus over Steele, Mandingo, and others, and as he’s not nearly as endowed, this seems to confirm my own views that such things aren’t the number one concerns of most Women.

    Personally, my problem w/most porn in our time is its utter lack of sexual chemistry, to say nothing of the piss poor condition of the male stars, who have NO seduction skills at all. Most Women don’t get wet during their scenes, the editing is fast and choppy, etc. Its quite a bore to watch most porn these days, I know it is for me.

    Anyway, back to the MPT debate…

    O

    LikeLike


  282. on May 12, 2009 at 6:06 pm whiskey

    Gig —

    Paternity testing kits are cheap and easy. They were a plot issue in “Veronica Mars” during it’s run about five years ago, and they have gotten cheaper and easier since.

    And the social driver, absent the clueless beta in this instance, is to make most marriages where cuckolding is true, dissolve quickly, often with the man doing his best to “punish” the woman by hiding assets and so on, and many more men refusing to get married.

    “Enough” women exposed as cuckolds and it’s the same thing as counterfeit currency. Even is the majority of women don’t cheat, most men will treat them as if they do. This is particularly true for men considering marriage.

    Most men would like marriage, since it’s a good deal for them, in terms of companionship and reproduction. But faced with a real risk of raising another guy’s kid, a lot of guys will simply refuse marriage and adopt “spread your seed” attitudes. It won’t happen overnight but can happen fairly rapidly.

    In 1950’s Britain, White working class men were mostly faithful, married, relatively meek, law abiding, and mild. By the 1980’s, around thirty years later, that changed considerably and by the 1990’s almost no White British working class men were married, nearly all (90% or more) had adopted “spread your seed” tactics.

    The bad news for women is that human beings including men are flexible. Men can and will quickly adapt to cuckolding by even a minority of women by going forward with spread-your-seed.

    Johnnymarks — that is a terrible thing to say and you should be ashamed of yourself. Cheating is bad, it’s not worthy of what you describe which should be limited to things like bin Laden. Societies where women are treated like cattle are no better than ones where women hold unlimited social and sexual power. No real man would react emotionally LIKE A WOMAN. Cheating is distressing, the only appropriate response is to remove one’s self from any such woman as quickly as possible and bang as many girls as possible. Anything else is acting like a woman with lots of testosterone.

    Act like a goddamn man. Men CONTROL their emotions.

    Anony — It does not MATTER what the state will do (typical female response by the way). Enough men will Paternity test because it’s cheap and easy and they’d like to know. Some men, weak, feminized, deplorable, will give way to cheap and easy emotion and murder their wives or do terrible things. Others, men in the real sense of the word, will simply divorce them and hide as many assets as possible and move on with their lives.

    [Women LOVE and almost to a woman support forcing beta men to pay for cuckolding and support, while worshipping guys like Obama, Edwards, and Clinton, who were Alpha Males cheating on their wives.]

    But for most, men will treat women as a currency with significant counterfeits. ANY commitment at all will require extensive “test and proof” just like nations with large amounts of counterfeit bills have transactions achingly slow as everyone checks laboriously for counterfeits.

    Women cannot FORCE men to commit and get married. Enough women cuckold men who do so, and pretty much most men will simply act like Roissy or G.

    As for wiping the beta from the gene pool, all that does is make the next generations of children the result of aggressive, socially dominant men. IQ, and particularly IQ related to abstract thinking (technology, biological science, engineering) will all collapse. Since notorious womanizers are notably absent from those fields and certainly the mass of work required to create technological advances. Even the Wright Brothers and Edison depended on a whole network of other “beta” men who provided light-weight gasoline engines, or electrical wires and batteries, for their basic research.

    We already know what a female paradise of “spread your seed” looks like: the Congo.

    Xsplat: The Mighty culture of Mongolia is shaped by Ghengis Khan, who must have monopolized nearly all fertile women to produce today, centuries later, 15% of all men in direct male descent. So icky awful data suggests that Alpha male societies (Afghanistan, Mongolia, Congo, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia) are absent oil discoveries violent failures that produce nothing and easy prey for cooperative beta men who enforce female fidelity.

    LikeLike


  283. on May 12, 2009 at 6:07 pm doug1

    Kim–

    that the amount of careless sluts would go down making everyone more monogamous…including males (not by choice but because women would be scared to sleep around), no?

    I think it would have a big effect on female carelessness but a much smaller effect on sleeping around.

    After all, girls at elite colleges especially if they have grad school in mind really, really don’t want to get preggers, by and large. In fact they almost always get abortions if they do become preggers, in my experience. This has not dampened the amount of casual sex at elite colleges compared to elsewhere in this age group, from what I can tell. If anything, this age group at top colleges does more rather than less quick rotation hooking up, compared to those in the workforce, from what I’ve seen.

    But would there be a decrease in children born to unwed mothers if the unwed didn’t get child support? Oh yeah.

    LikeLike


  284. on May 12, 2009 at 6:10 pm Madras

    Roissy,

    You have been off on the last few posts…but this is dead on and important. Thank you for telling it as it is.

    LikeLike


  285. on May 12, 2009 at 6:13 pm Chic noir

    dave Yeah…but what does this have to do with our debate about the equivalence between rape and cuckoldry?
    I wrote that I don’t think the two are equivalent. I guess that’s just my way of looking at things. I don’t harp on soemthin over and over for the most part.

    I think my response to doug just about covered it.
    You do known that sometimes men are raped as well as molested as children. Men who have been raped are as troubled about it as women. Some people never get over it. That feeling that someone took something from you that wasn’t theirs to take. Someone that is such a part of your being human and possibly exposing you to diseases and pregnancy

    LikeLike


  286. on May 12, 2009 at 6:14 pm Chic noir

    Peter North and Byron Long.

    NOOOOOOOOO not peter north. He was one of the few who looks to give his female costars a good time. Byron long is the very light skinned brother right?

    LikeLike


  287. on May 12, 2009 at 6:15 pm whiskey

    As for artificial wombs and sexbots, I think most men have already created a classic case of substitution.

    For companionship and sociability: the “bromance” and hanging out with male buddies.

    For sex, pr0n. Which is a trillion dollar industry, making money constantly.

    Reproduction? Probably not, absent the wife who is faithful, I don’t see much impetus or desire for men to reproduce. Which creates a genetic bottleneck, guys who are lower in testosterone but higher in IQ in particular with unbounded female freedom and choice get frozen out of the reproduction market, absent Game and spread your seed.

    What you’ll see is on the bottom end, endless thugs as the only ones reproducing (lower socio-economic scale). For middle and upper income women, only Game type Alphas will impregnate them. With all due respect to Roissy and Roosh, these types of guys are unlikely to provide the next generation of engineers, bio-med researchers, geneticists, scientists, and mathematicians who will power our technological advances.

    What’s likely is Congo-like attitudes on the bottom and decadent aristocrats on the top and middle end.

    Which is already creating a crisis for women wanting Beta Men to marry them. Women play the field (particularly for women in their twenties) always chasing the more Alpha guy in the bar that night. In their thirties they’ve racked up 30-50 sex partners easily, and want to get serious. Female bloggers like “Dawn Summers” have noted how hard it is for them to date quality men, the few men who will date women in their thirties are either bitter betas, or quite lacking in attractiveness and social qualities.

    Most higher quality beta men have concluded that pr0n and male companionship beats being a cuckolded beta in a loveless marriage. Alphas are busy with girls in their twenties. A woman in her thirties is worthy of only pump and dump.

    Men have REACTED already to the shift in female power and selection. Most women just are not going to get married, as they age into their thirties, and they’ll just have to deal with that.

    LikeLike


  288. on May 12, 2009 at 6:15 pm Obsidian

    Chic,
    The Male Pill is irrelevant; the issue wrt Paternity Fraud is that the Man was deceived into caring for a child not his own. Period. This is what must be rectified. MPT is one such way to address this.

    As for porn, I believe Belladonna has the interesting distinction of successfully deepthroating Lexington Steele. I haven’t seen this myself but have read about the feat. Wesley Pipes I consider to be a hoot, the guy’s funny. At least I think he is.

    There are guys in porn who could be considered misogynistic, but we have to remember as well, that quite a few Women like their sex rough n ready. So, I say to each his or her own.

    O

    LikeLike


  289. on May 12, 2009 at 6:16 pm kim

    Something tells me that a lot of people on here who support mandatory paternity testing also disapprove of legal abortions…but that’s just a guess.

    Anyway, I personally just don’t think that mandatory paternity testing would really help make society a better place. I get what people are saying about it and why they think it’s a good idea…but it just seems a bit radical to me. Like someone above mentioned…guilty until proven innocent doesn’t seem fair to me.

    LikeLike


  290. on May 12, 2009 at 6:17 pm xsplat

    whiskey

    So icky awful data suggests that Alpha male societies (Afghanistan, Mongolia, Congo, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia)

    I’m not informed on the geographical spread of his seed, but are you correct that it was in the countries you listed? And even so, how do you know that his 15% is not a net boon, rather than drain, on the society?

    I get your point – the tecnically inclined are a social strength, and I agree that such people often lack social skills. Still and all, geeks get paid well, and don’t seem to be suffering badly, in the sexual marketplace.

    LikeLike


  291. on May 12, 2009 at 6:18 pm Tood

    How the hell can Caroline Hax dissuade the man from getting a paternity test? It is so cheap, easy, and discreet.

    I suspect Caroline Hax has herself cuckolded her husband, which is why she is being evasive and wants to scold the Beta male for being beta.

    LikeLike


  292. on May 12, 2009 at 6:18 pm epsilonguy

    Why the fuss? Hax is a hack. Besides she’s only defending her gender. And there are no limits when self-preservation is at stake.

    LikeLike


  293. on May 12, 2009 at 6:18 pm havana

    ROISSY!!!!

    Listen what a culture slowly destroys the drive to reproduce among its people, the population that follows that culture withers away.

    The world doesn’t end, only those who follow the directive to NOT reproduce cease to exist.

    Call it “Cultural Darwinism” if you will….. (btw this is not a scientific term I just made it up)

    Now…. what culture will replace the present one? Simple a culture that values polygamy and encourages both men and women to procreate.

    And it is already happening:

    LikeLike


  294. on May 12, 2009 at 6:19 pm Chic noir

    Mu Most of the Sisters I’ve spoken with report they tend to favor Mr. Marcus over Steele, Mandingo, and others, and as he’s not nearly as endowed, this seems to confirm my own views that such things aren’t the number one concerns of most Women.

    yea there is just something about Mr. Marcus. Besides being very handsome and one heck of a licker. he just radiates manliness on screen. He seems alpha but a little beta(shy and sweet) at the same time while being able to fix your car or the plumbing in your kitchen zinc.

    LikeLike


  295. on May 12, 2009 at 6:19 pm epsilonguy

    Why the fuss? Hax is a hack. What can you expect? After all, she’s defending her gender. And there are no limits — moral, ethical, logical or otherwise — when self-preservation is at stake.

    LikeLike


  296. on May 12, 2009 at 6:19 pm Chic noir

    @Mu- Obsession is one of the few females who looks like she is really enjoying herself.

    LikeLike


  297. on May 12, 2009 at 6:24 pm Dave from Hawaii

    That feeling that someone took something from you that wasn’t theirs to take. Someone that is such a part of your being human and possibly exposing you to diseases and pregnancy

    Oh? And you think the cuckolded man doesn’t feel like someone took something from him that wasn’t theirs to take? Like his own family? His offspring? His Wife’s Matirmonial Vows?

    Something like your own offspring is certainly part of being a human….and not to mention possibly exposing you to tremendous heartbreak in finding out that the child you may have spent YEARS supporting, raising and caring for is NOT YOUR OWN?

    Sorry chic, you will never understand that cuckoldry can be just as much if not worse of a violation of a man’s basic human rights as the rape of a female.

    LikeLike


  298. on May 12, 2009 at 6:26 pm xsplat

    Dave

    Sorry chic, you will never understand that cuckoldry can be just as much if not worse of a violation of a man’s basic human rights as the rape of a female.

    And what would be her motivation to understand? The search for truth, goodness, and beauty?

    Ha. When attributing intentionality to women, cynicism is a habit better than trust.

    LikeLike


  299. on May 12, 2009 at 6:27 pm lurker

    “better take it with you and I hope it doesn’t break. It would be smatter to double up.”

    -Chic, you do know that doubling up on condoms *reduces* their effectiveness, right?

    and your basic opinion on which male porn stars are beloved is based on…the kinds of movies they do? Not real convincing there. Id take a stat on who was requested.

    O, I hear you. In fact, many female stars are allowed a “No” list, of male porn stars they’ll never work with. Most, like you have supposed, base it on size—they don’t want to be torn up. Most women want a man who is above average in all respects (height, looks, money, penis size, smarts, etc.) but not extremely above average—especially penis size.

    Most female stars are beat up after 3-5 years–it’s the same shelf life of an NFL running back, and, if you think about it, they both take the same amount of people pounding them (heh). Even MILF porn stars usually start late (28-29) and are flabby messes in half a decade, despite their “experience.”

    However, if you become a “studio girl” you can last a long time now . Studio girls—girls who sign exclusive long term contracts with big porn studios, like (or maybe only) Vivid–are carefully controlled: the studio only puts them in high quality productions, limits the numbers of scenes or men they take per year, limits exposure in magazines and stripping, prevents them escorting (how many girls make extra money on the sly), etc. That includes barring them from being in most internet porn (good bye Bang Bus).

    They set up P.R. as well; Howard Stern doesn’t choose them as guests blindly, you know.

    This is, sneakily, how Jenna Jameson lasted so long–she limtied her exposure so she was the desireable whore.

    ‘Course studios only invest contract money in top quality girls; ugly or plainer girls don’t get the protection. Notice how Bree Olsen isn’t so available anymore on downloads —or maybe that’s just me—she signed a contract.

    And now, with my in depth knowledge of porn industry insider information, I will now light myself on fire.

    LikeLike


  300. on May 12, 2009 at 6:28 pm Chic noir

    Obsidian
    Chic,
    The Male Pill is irrelevant; the issue wrt Paternity Fraud is that the Man was deceived into caring for a child not his own. Period.

    Actually it’s not. Prevention is the best type of protection. If a woman comes to you and says she pregnant you can tell her “hell no, it’s not mine”. Then proceed to tell her that your on birthcontrol . IIRC there was a man here who posted such a story just that he had had a vasectomy.

    LikeLike


  301. on May 12, 2009 at 6:29 pm Chic noir

    lurker -Chic, you do know that doubling up on condoms *reduces* their effectiveness, right?
    Lurker, doubling up with the male pill and condoms not two condoms.

    LikeLike


  302. on May 12, 2009 at 6:29 pm cptnapalm

    “That feeling that someone took something from you that wasn’t theirs to take.”

    So sort of like when a girl says “I’m on the pill” or the equivalent?

    “possibly exposing you to diseases and pregnancy”

    So sort of like when a girl cheats on you, perhaps all virused out and, well, pregnancy which (unlike a woman) you have no say so over?

    If it is diseases and pregnancy which makes a rape so awful, then cuckoldry is actually worse in as much as it has the same things but one more on top: threats of prison if you don’t pay up the cash for something you have no say so about.

    Not saying that this *is* what makes rape so horrible, but if that is what makes it so horrible, then cuckoldry + pregnancy is worse.

    LikeLike


  303. on May 12, 2009 at 6:30 pm joel

    This guy needs a lawyer. I think he’ll find out he is screwed. There is a statue of limitations to challenging paternity.

    He should just come straight out and ask for a paternity test.I don’t think if their marriage is happy she will be so unhappy to take the test. If she loves him, she will have no problem reassuring him. It could even flatter her, by making her realize that he appreciates how sexy she is.

    If she refuses, that’s your answer.

    The reluctance of women to allow such testing is all the argument you need, as men, for insist on this testing.

    This is just an example of the mistreatment of men in our society. He will be forced to pay child support no matter what the testing shows. The woman will suffer not the slightest legal or financial penalty. He should divorce her if the child is not his. After all, this will just happen again and again. He deserves better. Betas are essentially good people. They have just believed all the lies.

    LikeLike


  304. on May 12, 2009 at 6:31 pm lurker

    O, one reason female stars are in power is that guys just want a generic cock in there—a cock that looks like their’s. Its the hotness and wildness of the chick that matters.

    Some guys, like lex steele on being black and extreme, or North, being a large firehouse, get famous, but most guys just need to be reliable and generic.

    LikeLike


  305. on May 12, 2009 at 6:33 pm Chic noir

    lurker and your basic opinion on which male porn stars are beloved is based on…the kinds of movies they do?
    No there costars reactions.

    Not real convincing there. Id take a stat on who was requested.
    read intervews of movie directors. That’s where I got my info from.

    Even MILF porn stars usually start late (28-29) and are flabby messes in half a decade, despite their “experience.”
    Nina Hartley is an exception. I bet Peter loves Nina.

    And now, with my in depth knowledge of porn industry insider information, I will now light myself on fire.
    LOL
    DA said you don’t know jack buddy.

    LikeLike


  306. on May 12, 2009 at 6:33 pm lurker

    Chic, I ain’t fucking like that. Rather have somethign I can remove than a pill messing with my chemistry.

    I’ve been with many girls who refuse the pill for the same reason–its too important an area for something like that. That’s fine—my own condoms and shooting on their face works just as well.

    Lick it up, bitch!

    LikeLike


  307. on May 12, 2009 at 6:34 pm tunacanman

    said to the tune of
    “no shirt, no shoes, no diiiiiice!” from fast times at ridgemont high.

    Just say….

    “no prenup, no dna test, no deal!”

    LikeLike


  308. on May 12, 2009 at 6:34 pm xsplat

    Ya, Chic, guys with vasectomies get that drama all the time. Sure, that works. So does paternity testing.

    Paternity testing is even better. You know what I love? I love it when the spider has me in her web, only to discover that I’m the real spider. I use a woman’s spider lair as my spider lair. I make her trap into my trap.

    LikeLike


  309. on May 12, 2009 at 6:35 pm Chuck

    lurker:

    didn’t write anything about “Passion of the Christ”

    LikeLike


  310. on May 12, 2009 at 6:36 pm lurker

    Chic:

    “No there costars reactions”
    —so your stat is how well a porn star fakes her orgasm. Not strong Chic, not strong.

    “read intervews of movie directors. That’s where I got my info from.”
    —that I would take, but the msot requested list works better.

    “Nina Hartley is an exception. I bet Peter loves Nina.”
    —Nina quit for several years to live ina threesome. And looking at her now makes you cry for the cruelty of time.

    LikeLike


  311. on May 12, 2009 at 6:37 pm roissy

    Nina Hartley is an exception. I bet Peter loves Nina.

    chic, don’t derail the thread. this one is too juicy and i want you to savor every pertinent comment. it has been delightful for me to witness the reactions of the women here confirming all my predictions.

    LikeLike


  312. on May 12, 2009 at 6:38 pm Chic noir

    lurker Chic, I ain’t fucking like that. Rather have somethign I can remove than a pill messing with my chemistry

    I can respect this. I will say that I’ve taken something and my body became a little weird. I knew someone who had to be hospitalized for while behind her choice of BC.

    FUN female to female Joke: The reason they call it birth control is because it takes away your desire.

    Yup stuff made me dryer than the Sahara and colder than Greenland.

    and shooting on their face works just as well.
    A man was arrested for doing something of the such resently.

    LikeLike


  313. on May 12, 2009 at 6:40 pm Obsidian

    Chic,
    I’m familiar w/Obsession and largely agree w/your assessment. She also seems one of the relatively few Women in porn who enjoy giving good blowjobs w/lots of spit.

    I haven’t noticed Mr. Marcus to be particularly adept at eating pussy but I’ll take your word for it. What I will say is that a Man learning how to make a Woman arch her back and make like Niagra Falls on the strength of his tongue certainly can’t hurt. This comes from direct personal experience.

    Kim,
    I do indeed support MPT and I am Pro Life. I fail to see your point; please explain?

    O

    LikeLike


  314. on May 12, 2009 at 6:40 pm Chic noir

    chic, don’t derail the thread.
    no problem sir

    but i wasn’t trying to derail I just saw her as Peter’s type.
    this one is too juicy and i want you to savor every pertinent comment.
    why me?

    it has been delightful for me to witness the reactions of the women here confirming all my predictions.
    UH I could have told you that most women won’t agree.

    LikeLike


  315. on May 12, 2009 at 6:40 pm doug1

    Chuck–

    You asked for links to cases in various states (and the UK, Canada and Australia) where men have been required to pay the full freight child support for the full statutory period for children which DNA tests have proven are not his. I’ve seen this many times. I don’t have them at hand. I could easily dig them up. So can you. Do your own looking. It’s a fact. I know of NO examples of an Anglosphere court (which was not reversed) holding that a man who’s acted as the father to a child for more than two years has been allowed to not pay full freight child support. Not a single one.

    i’m just trying to tamp down the hyperbole around this issue that’s all, i agree with the roissy’s sentiment and POV. men are getting screwed, but when we start playing the victim card, crying that our gender is being raped, i wonder how long it is before our “masculinity movement” turns into a slightly higher T-leveled feminist movement, complete with shirllness.

    First I’m not worried about “higher T-level feminists in a movement or otherwise. The only thing that makes feminist arguments effective is when they get lots of male support. That’s generally based upon misinformation, and a failure for contrary men to get their message out.

    As far as playing the victim goes, that’s the wrong way to look at it. Sure that charge will be thrown or more often implied. (That’s what “bitter” and similar that is reflexively thrown out by feminists including here sometimes, is all about. Doesn’t work so well on men that have a long history of success with hot women.)

    Anyone can suffer from unjust laws aimed at them as a group. In that sense men as a group are victims.

    The notion that alphas are never divorced is simply untrue. It’s also not impossible that an alpha could have a cheating wife conceive a child by another alpha, and hide it from her husband, who she really doesn’t want to lose. Some women are sluts. Some women who were goodish to catch a catch of a husband allow themselves to relax and become sluts later.

    Read cheating wives blogs. Although most seem to be married to higher betas, some seem to be married to alphas of one kind or another. Women almost always say there’s something wrong with their husband to deflect blame from themselves for cheating, which residually remains although just barely in many corners of our culture.

    Sometimes though it’s pretty clear that she’d cheat on ANYONE after awhile, unless she was terrified of ending up on the street with a kid with little to no money. There really does seem to be something to Michelle Langley’s theory (taken from some in socio biology / evo psych) that women tend to have a four year period of strongly bonding with a man they fall deeply in love with, but thereafter it’s often much weakened, and especially if she has a high sex drive, she’s likely to look for her next attractive man, who’s attraction to her renews her sense of special female worth.

    Consider how long Hollywood alpha male marriages last, particularly to celebrity equals or near equals.

    Yeah it’s less likely that alphas will be cheated on or have their wife bear another’s child. But it still happens.

    LikeLike


  316. on May 12, 2009 at 6:41 pm Chic noir

    @lurker- you can almost always tell a faker or at least I can.

    LikeLike


  317. on May 12, 2009 at 6:42 pm Chuck

    Cptnplm:

    From the link about the man in Florida ordered to pay support for a child that wasn’t his.

    “Unfortunately, however, Florida has a one-year statute of limitations to prove fraud after a divorce, and Parker didn’t file in time.”

    The fact that he has to pay for another man’s child makes me sick to my stomach. I would move to another country, but unfortunately, they got him on an unrelated legal technicality which makes this case somewhat different.

    I do not doubt whatsoever that the legal system in this country would force a man to pay for a child that isn’t his, I’m merely arguing that those taking roissy’s claim that this is akin to “male rape” are misguided in their analogy.

    it’s highway robbery, and really, it’s just as bad. i’m merely arguing a semantical point here because i cringe when i think of men playing the rape victim card given that rape has a certain connotation of weakness that being robbed doesn’t really carry.

    LikeLike


  318. on May 12, 2009 at 6:43 pm michael farris

    “a real man couldn’t care less if his ex-wife’s child of another man’s seed were to be exposed on a hilltop to hungry vultures.”

    I guess this also means a real man doesn’t care if his changeling children are exposed on a hilltop to hungry vultures.

    That would explain why alphas aren’t necessarily the evolutionary powers they think they are – they really don’t care about their children whether changeling or legitimate (assuming they ever try to commit).

    Betas might raise some changelings along the way but they also have a better track record of raising and protect their own kids to reproductive age. Alphas are basically turtles, they reproduce without knowing it and abandon their children to the caprices of fate.

    LikeLike


  319. on May 12, 2009 at 6:44 pm Chic noir

    @chuck- A smarter bit would be to take custody of the child if you are attached to the child. I read about such a case where the cockuled husband/ex husband to his wife to court and won. if you really want to sock it to her, make her pay child support.

    LikeLike


  320. on May 12, 2009 at 6:47 pm Chic noir

    I predict that this comment box will reach 900 comments before 12 midnight. Wow, nothing gets men going like this topic.

    FYI, you can purchase DNA testing kits in CVS.

    LikeLike


  321. on May 12, 2009 at 6:47 pm xsplat

    Chic

    FUN female to female Joke: The reason they call it birth control is because it takes away your desire.

    Yup stuff made me dryer than the Sahara and colder than Greenland.

    I read on newscientist.com that for some women the pill causes PERMANENT loss of libido.

    I always advocate Diane as the pill of choice – seems to have less adverse side affects, such as hair loss and bad temper, and sometimes makes the tits grow and grow.

    By the way, I previously posted here under the name Guy Noir, and wondered if you saw that and chose your name, or if you’ve been here longer, and I saw your name and subconsciously chose that one.

    LikeLike


  322. on May 12, 2009 at 6:47 pm tunacanman

    Joe, I bet cuckoldry has very little to do with how attractive the woman is..

    anyone got stats on this?

    Roissy, how about a combined “cuckodress or not?” poll combined wiht a hotness rating/scale challenge?

    LikeLike


  323. on May 12, 2009 at 6:49 pm Dave from Hawaii

    I predict that this comment box will reach 900 comments before 12 midnight. Wow, nothing gets men going like this topic.

    Sorta like the topic of rape with women, eh?

    LikeLike


  324. on May 12, 2009 at 6:50 pm Marcus Aureliette

    Doug:
    I welcome the opportunity to brass out and request/demand it as a condition of getting married. See my script on that in the comments above.

    Any woman that wouldn’t easily agree, I don’t want to stay with.

    That’s entirely your prerogative, but it’s possible that not all men share your taste for confrontation. They still deserve to not be deceived about the paternity of the child they’ll be supporting, and making the test mandatory would accomplish that with far less potential drama.

    LikeLike


  325. on May 12, 2009 at 6:51 pm lurker

    Chic: “you can almost always tell a faker or at least I can.”
    —why does every woman think her bullshit detector is the best on the planet? Probably b/c they each think they spew the most as well.

    No one can tell. That’s why I no longer care.

    LikeLike


  326. on May 12, 2009 at 6:52 pm lurker

    MPT is the greatest idea since denying women the right to vote.

    LikeLike


  327. on May 12, 2009 at 6:53 pm Obsidian

    Chic,
    OK I’ll bite-which of the better known female porn stars are faking it in your view? I’d be interested in hearing your views.

    O

    LikeLike


  328. on May 12, 2009 at 6:54 pm Chuck

    O:

    “Let me be clear: the very nature of Cuckoldry is indeed a form of rape, if, we accept that rape is the violation of another’s body on sexual grounds.”

    But O, rape is the violation of one’s body on sexual grounds because of the physical act of unwanted touching. Rape has a definition already:

    http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Rape

    It is forcible sexual relations with a person against that person’s will.

    there are plenty of other legal terms for what happens to a cuckolded man; robbery, theft, breach of contract etc. there is no need to alter the definition to fit a hyperbolic statement.

    “Here, a Man is violated on sexual grounds”

    no, the grounds upon which he was violated involved sexual activity, but he was not violated sexually per se. there is a difference here.

    “he is led to believe that he is investing time, emotions and resources/money into a child he believes is his own but very well may not be, and the child is the product of sexual actions taken on the part of his wife and another Man, yet he’s led to believe his own sexual acts have brought the child about. ”

    very well. she’s a raging cunt, i agree. i wouldn’t care if she were locked up in prison.

    LikeLike


  329. on May 12, 2009 at 6:54 pm kim

    Obsidian,

    Sorry, part of that is my fault because I forgot to put that it was a response to Doug. Anyway, if you look at his comment to me above he is saying that MPT wouldn’t have an effect on sleeping around because girls have control over most birth control methods and can get abortions. My argument was that MTP would mean a more monogamous society for both men and women because women would be more scared of sleeping around and cheating. Also, I think that men would probably be more cautious about it too because MTP would mean they’d end up being more responsible for children they produced with random women.

    LikeLike


  330. on May 12, 2009 at 6:56 pm xsplat

    Doug

    There really does seem to be something to Michelle Langley’s theory (taken from some in socio biology / evo psych) that women tend to have a four year period of strongly bonding with a man they fall deeply in love with, but thereafter it’s often much weakened, and especially if she has a high sex drive, she’s likely to look for her next attractive man, who’s attraction to her renews her sense of special female worth.

    Consider how long Hollywood alpha male marriages last, particularly to celebrity equals or near equals.

    Ya, I prefer the realists attitude as well, and tend to try to have it sit well with my personal emotional attitudes.

    Women are what they are. Rented.

    LikeLike


  331. on May 12, 2009 at 6:57 pm doug1

    kim–

    Something tells me that a lot of people on here who support mandatory paternity testing also disapprove of legal abortions…but that’s just a guess.

    I support abortions. Enthusiastically. (So btw does Roissy.) I think there should be a lot more of them. I think an infant should only be brought into the world when both bio parents want to have and raise that child.

    I’m so in favor of abortion rights that I think men should have them too. No, not the right to order a woman under the knife (really in most cases the suction device). Instead the right to abort his obligation to support the child (in a timely manner the woman can take into account in making her own decisions), but with that all rights of visitation or otherwise of parenthood if she goes forward and births the infant and doesn’t give it up of adoption.

    Anyway, I personally just don’t think that mandatory paternity testing would really help make society a better place. I get what people are saying about it and why they think it’s a good idea…but it just seems a bit radical to me. Like someone above mentioned…guilty until proven innocent doesn’t seem fair to me.

    Et tu Brute? I’m really disappointed in you for that Kim, truly. I though you could put yourself into a man’s position better than that, as so many men try to do with women. *sigh*

    It would be a better place for a lot of men. Is that completely unimportant to you?

    It would also make a lot of women more careful — both in deciding to have and affair and in being careless, or even subconsciously excited, about getting pregnant if she does. (Of course if theirs is one of the tiny minority of true willing cuckold relationships that extend to “pregnancy play” or intentions, that’s fully consensual. Just covering all the bases here.)

    Requiring paternity tests of all women SELF EVIDENTLY DOES NOT assume that all married women are guilty of both cheating and doing it in a manner that allows a real possibility of having gotten pregnant that way. Instead it assumes that some percentage of women fall into this category, and that in some of those cases that will have occurred, and that their husband ought to be able to find out. That later assumption is in fact not that, but a FACT.

    So the whole stated basis for your objection is totally bogus.

    LikeLike


  332. on May 12, 2009 at 6:57 pm lurker

    Chuck, its unwanted touching if my dick or wallet has touched the seed of another man and not known it wasn’t my own.

    LikeLike


  333. on May 12, 2009 at 6:59 pm Rum

    Guys, it is basically a waste of time arguing with females about the evils of false paternity attribution. They are your enemies on this issue; they really cannot help themselves. The best they will ever do is grant that cheating a man in this way is sort of bad, then say, “Yes, but…”
    Just get testing the done. You do not need a womans permission. Besides, the brave new world of genetic-based medicine will solve the problem automatically, with or without female approval.
    One reason that mandatory testing will prevail is that women obviously do not know who the father is in many cases so what is the point of asking them? It is just stupid to even ask them.

    LikeLike


  334. on May 12, 2009 at 6:59 pm lurker

    O,they all are. The scenese are 3-4 hours long. They might get 1-2 orgasms right away, but the rest is fuck-fuck-fuck-pause-pause–bang-bang-bang….. you cut 3 hours down to 20 minutes, and nothing there is real.

    LikeLike


  335. on May 12, 2009 at 6:59 pm michael farris

    MPT would only work if women could call in suspected ‘real’ fathers to be tested (and a man found responsible for a married woman’s pregnancy was forced to pay support for the child instead of the husband).

    Men basically have very low standards about casual sex partners (and unrealistic ones toward wives) and women have different standards for casual sex partners vs husbands. You’ve gotta crack down on both or neither.

    LikeLike


  336. on May 12, 2009 at 7:02 pm Let fury have the hour!

    “A universal criticism of men has become their emotional withdrawal, their inability to convey their emotions, their inability to communicate and that they are not good at expressing their feelings. The assumption being made is that the feelings men are suppressing are supposed to be nice feelings and are not to be held back. That assumption is derived from liberated women’s egocentric premise that men should automatically be an unconditional source of good feelings at convenience instead of being independent entities. The feelings he’s not communicating are supposed be nice because that’s what would be useful for other people. That’s an erroneous assumption. It’s my observation that the nation should encourage this condition of emotional repression and pray to whatever deity is currently in vogue that it continue. If the serious men in this country began to regain their capacity for indignation and express the backlog of barely-controlled wrath they are repressing, there is likely to be an all-out civil war.” You ever read this guy Kocher? http://members.mountain.net/theanalyticpapers/polam13.htm

    LikeLike


  337. on May 12, 2009 at 7:02 pm lurker

    Michale, jigga wha?

    Women can sue for paternity/child support now, so your issue is moot. What we’re talking about here is a father not being sold into slavery.

    “You’ve gotta crack down on both or neither.”
    —A cheating whore is worse than a man who cheats. This “equality” bullshit is just that: bullshit.

    LikeLike


  338. on May 12, 2009 at 7:03 pm Obsidian

    Kim
    Yea, you hit on another very important point which again, is interestingly sidestepped by the feminists-MPT would greatly cool out the deadbeat daddy issue, by ensuring beyond a shadow of a doubt that so and so IS the baby daddy and as such he’s gotta pay. I mean, there’s really no logical, rational reason as to why a Woman wouldn’t want MPT-its good for the child.

    Again, I fail to see your connection btw pro MPT supporters, and their views one way or another wrt Abortion. Please explain?

    O

    LikeLike


  339. on May 12, 2009 at 7:04 pm xsplat

    Doug

    Et tu Brute? I’m really disappointed in you for that Kim, truly. I though you could put yourself into a man’s position better than that, as so many men try to do with women. *sigh*

    Ha! Oh, to be naive again. I almost miss it.

    Women do not think as men do. They think emotionally and for purely selfish ends. When they appear to act socially, it is in the better interest of their groups, often womens groups.

    They have no use for truth. They can’t use truth, when emotions are involved.

    I know of no exceptions that are worth fucking.

    LikeLike


  340. on May 12, 2009 at 7:05 pm twiceaday

    Tood:
    “This was true in India as well, until recently. They were virgins at marriage, and cheating was just very hard to logistically execute, and too risky if caught. Period.

    Sure, you know more about it than people who actually lived there.”

    I haven’t lived there myself, but I’ve heard numerous accounts of cheating from people who did in the 30s and 40s. Yes, many were virgins at marriage, but many were married at 12 or 13 (some as early as 9). And since when have logistics gotten in the way of libido?

    LikeLike


  341. on May 12, 2009 at 7:06 pm lurker

    “And since when have logistics gotten in the way of libido?”
    –when the consequences (pregnancy, societal condemnation, loss of finances) outweighed the benefits.

    LikeLike


  342. on May 12, 2009 at 7:06 pm kim

    Doug,

    Hey now. I said that I get it. I just think getting the government involved in stuff like this isn’t helpful. I feel the same way about child support. The government is involved in too much already, but unfortunately most people in this world are irresponsible fucks who ruin it for everyone and then require the government to step in to make things “fair.”

    I also am glad you support abortions. I feel the exact same way…that in most cases a child would be better off not being born than being born into some sort of destructive unloving situation or being born and put into an orphanage.

    LikeLike


  343. on May 12, 2009 at 7:09 pm roissy

    POS:
    although I enjoy your hypertensive histrionics,

    funny, you don’t sound like you enjoy it.

    I fear it interferes with your comprehension.

    braced for your backpedal, i am.

    -my concern is for the loneliness of men who can not trust (ie. Roissy’s campfire here), not for betas.

    anony you have lost all perspective. my words must have shaken you to your core. the kind of men who trust women the least are the same kind of men who rarely go without the company of women.
    mull it over.

    -I share your contempt of cheating and cuckholding women

    your shucking and jiving on this subject says otherwise.

    -MPT would presume guilt until proven innocence; a toxic presumption.

    what do you think a marriage contract is but a presumption of “guilt” that one or the other partner may pack up and leave on the slightest pretext?
    yet there is nothing inherently toxic about taking marital vows (or at least there wasn’t until recent history). it doesn’t destroy “trust in the state” to agree to its legally binding conditions.
    although, destroying some trust in the state wouldn’t be a bad thing for the USA at this time.

    DNA testing may be easy, but mandating it would destroy trust of women by the state.

    government mandates lots of things that hinder this amorphous “trust” you blather on about in a transparently feeble effort to find some loophole with which you can escape the serious reduction of your ovarian power that MPT threatens to bring.
    for instance, the state mandates that teenagers have to take a driver’s exam to earn a license to drive. this is an aknowledgement by the state of a lack of trust in teenagers’ self-taught driving skills. do you think driver’s tests are a “toxic presumption”?

    put simply, “but don’t you TRUST me??” is not a legitimate line of argument. and judging by your hostility to MPT on this humble blog, any state distrust of women may not be misplaced.

    -“trust but verify” really means “no trust” in the context of an intimate long-term commitment.

    you can bitch all you want but you can’t deny it worked to bring down the soviet empire.
    and really, isn’t that your main beef? that MPT will work as intended? by which i mean, it will work to remove an unfair mating market advantage that women currently possess.

    -I, and I suspect most women, would support a cuckholded beta to demand recompense for misappropriated paternity.

    MPT at birth would save so much time and energy, not to mention the psychological sanity of the parties involved.
    but if it’s recompense you support, you should be prepared for what exactly that entails. 18 years is a LOT of backpay the whore is gonna owe her cuckolded hubbie.

    somehow i doubt that when the MPT rubber hits the road and the lawyers are clamoring for restitution to the cuckolds that would nearly impoverish the whore mothers who dragged them into their web of lies for years, you’ll be at the forefront of the MPT movement cheering the handover of your gender’s power.

    LikeLike


  344. on May 12, 2009 at 7:10 pm xsplat

    Rum

    Rum

    Guys, it is basically a waste of time arguing with females about the evils of false paternity attribution. They are your enemies on this issue; they really cannot help themselves.

    A breath of fresh air. Thanks.

    I don’t understand why MEN are arguing for the state to help them to obtain a paternity test.

    I need a beer. Hey, state, get me a beer.

    LikeLike


  345. on May 12, 2009 at 7:11 pm I_Affe

    When just seeking the truth could change your life in dramatic and irreversible ways, it’s best to start not by actually doing something but by inviting each possible truth into your imagination as fact.

    I think she means something along the lines of, “Don’t ask questions to which you’re not ready to hear the answer”. Which I think is good advice in general. Prepare yourself for the worst so that you’re not so overwhelmingly surprised by the answer that you blow your brains out upon groking it.

    Of course I agree with you on what the guy should do.

    LikeLike


  346. on May 12, 2009 at 7:11 pm kim

    Obsidian,

    I guess basically…I feel that if MTP ever came about that abortions would most likely be made illegal. It just seems like a government that would implement that would also take away legal abortions. Meaning…a lot more unwanted children, but hey, at least they know who their parents are, even if they don’t actually want them.

    Obviously there is no way to prove that because I doubt any sort of research has been done between the two…but I’m sure someone on here will be able to find some mysterious statistic somewhere.

    LikeLike


  347. on May 12, 2009 at 7:14 pm lurker

    kim, that is simply not logical; that is feminist bullshit to the extreme.

    I hate abortion. i want it made illegal. i want doctors and women who get abortions to be thrown in prisons. But this has no relation to that at all. That you can’t draw any sense of a connection between the two betrays your feminist fear that cheating whores will be right castigated for being cheating whores, and left in the penniless destitution they so richly deserve.

    This is Kim’s last salvo—she’s reaching out to Roissy and other pro-abortion guys to try to prevent their rising up.

    Thye’re too smart for thsi bait. And so am I.

    LikeLike


  348. on May 12, 2009 at 7:14 pm Chic noir

    xplat I read on newscientist.com that for some women the pill causes PERMANENT loss of libido.

    could this have happened to me 😯 maybe this is why I only like the lick?

    @Mu- I don’t want to hyjack the thread but I will say india, sometimes sky blue and the other petite girl like india, i think her name starts with an L or something.

    LikeLike


  349. on May 12, 2009 at 7:19 pm doug1

    aliasclio–

    I don’t think that any of this is fair to men, mind you. I’d stop it if I could do so by fiat, and I would definitely tell that Post columnist to take a hike. In fact, I will do so, just to prove that I do in fact support men in this situation.

    Part of the reason you’re so beloved by many, and respected by all, who’ve read you enough here and/or at your own sites to have a good idea who you are (I mean aside from being hot and real smart) is that you’re so genuinely fair minded including towards men. We aren’t used to it. (That’s different from always agreeing with you. The point is it’s clear that that’s your effort.)

    The reason compulsory paternity testing won’t ever be imposed (I think), is that it isn’t in the state’s interest to impose it. What if the baby turned out not to be related to his “legal” father but his mother couldn’t or wouldn’t name the biological father? Or the biological father refused to be tested? The state would then be stuck with the child-support costs.

    In the US many states currently makes it very, very hard for woman to collect welfare unless they name all possible fathers. They could do the same in cases where she was married when she conceived by a man not her husband.

    As well, only a small minority of such cases would present for welfare.

    LikeLike


  350. on May 12, 2009 at 7:20 pm Gunslingergregi

    “””””””””””””””””on May 12, 2009 at 4:06 pm cptnapalm
    Any man who the state says is the father, is the father. Upon birth, said man shall be sentenced to 18 years in prison in a jury-less trial. The state will make up an arbitrary amount of money to be paid by said man to the woman who says he is the father of her child. This amount can be changed at any time, for any reason, up to any amount. Should the said man make his arbitrary payments on schedule, for that month he shall be allowed on furlough.””””””””””””””””””””””””””

    Holy fuck that is the way it is. That is current child support.
    Fucking amazing.

    LikeLike


  351. on May 12, 2009 at 7:20 pm Chuck

    Chode, i mean “Toad”:

    “Oooooh. Bitchy little Chucky is getting prissy..

    1) Mao and Stalin were LEFT-wing. No hemming and hawing, they were left-wing, period.

    2) Hitler was left-wing. I showed you proof. You did not like it, so you ignored it.”

    The first sums up my thought about left/right wing ideology and how the totalitarian dictators of this century fit into it.

    http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/15/easy-living-fueling-left-wing-extremism-us-says/#comment-68799

    I dont’ want to bog this thread down with long orations about political ideology.

    Hitler was a populist totalitarian. He espoused programs were counter to the status quo under the Weimar republic at the time of his ascension, which included what was viewed as a raw deal in the aftermath of WWI mixed with rampant hyperinflation and economic strife. He preached whatever he could to seize power, unfortunately, the biggest draw to his rhetoric was his blame for Germany’s woes on the Jews.

    Hitler had things in common with socialists, but he also had things in common with fascist right wingers like Mussolini. He was for corporatism (favoritism in industry). Hitler also favored a traditional national identity which is very similar to some of the ideas espoused by conservatives and right wingers today.

    And here is your contribution to the discussion, a link to some dude standing against a wall putting in his 2 cents. Wikipedia is a better source than this shit:

    http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/04/15/easy-living-fueling-left-wing-extremism-us-says/#comment-67019

    LikeLike


  352. on May 12, 2009 at 7:21 pm Gunslingergregi

    To go through that because of a womans lie to amazing to believe.

    LikeLike


  353. on May 12, 2009 at 7:21 pm roissy

    POS:
    MPT would be an egregious slap at almost all women. We don’t want to be treated with such distrust and lack of respect.

    talk about giving the game away. busted!

    ps if you have nothing to hide then you won’t have a problem with a state-mandated paternity test.

    pps respect must be earned.

    ppps cunt.

    LikeLike


  354. on May 12, 2009 at 7:21 pm kim

    lol lurker, what are you talking about? MTP and anti-abortion would both go under the category of “anti-women’s rights,” obviously. Is it really THAT hard to see the connection?

    “she’s reaching out to Roissy and other pro-abortion guys to try to prevent their rising up”

    huh? who’s rising up? pro-MTP campaigners? let’s be honest here, MTP is something people can wish for all they want but it’ll never happen. It doesn’t matter whether I support it or not, there is no way that would ever be passed in the US or any Western civilization. Sorry.

    LikeLike


  355. on May 12, 2009 at 7:22 pm kim

    sorry, MPT**

    LikeLike


  356. on May 12, 2009 at 7:22 pm Obsidian

    Kim,
    W/all due respect your above remark is illogical. How does abortion rates, one way or another, have anything to do at all w/MPT? Indeed, if anything, the abortion rate may go UP in the face of widespread MPT, not down. I fail to see your argument. Please clarify and elaborate?

    O

    LikeLike


  357. on May 12, 2009 at 7:23 pm Chic noir

    xsplat I don’t understand why MEN are arguing for the state to help them to obtain a paternity test.

    I need a beer. Hey, state, get me a beer.
    for some people debate is thrilling, even when it’s for something very trival.

    LikeLike


  358. on May 12, 2009 at 7:23 pm Gunslingergregi

    “””””””””””””””Roissy,
    No. If it was a hospital error, then the wife should be equally pleased as her husband to know the truth. Their marriage would remain strong, or at least viable, as they made arrangements with the hospital to find their true baby and swap kids with the other victimized family who mistakenly got their kid.”””””””””””””””””””””””””””””

    This is how the mandatory law gets passed. It is for the children to make sure they go with the right parents when they leave hospital.

    Keep chanting.

    It is for the children
    It is for the children
    It is for the children
    It is for the children
    It is for the children
    It is for the children
    It is for the children

    Should get it passed.

    LikeLike


  359. on May 12, 2009 at 7:30 pm lurker

    kim:
    “MTP and anti-abortion would both go under the category of “anti-women’s rights,”
    —-lol. only a woman would think that being forced to admit she’s a cheating whore and not lying to a man to get him to pay for a child not his would think that is a violation of *her* rights.

    Dear feminazi, I thought this was for *the children.*

    “MTP is something people can wish for all they want but it’ll never happen”
    —feminist attempt at demoralization. O, this is why we must fight!

    LikeLike


  360. on May 12, 2009 at 7:31 pm Firepower

    it’s better when betas pay child support payments to cheating cunt wives

    better than me, via taxes and welfare

    betas are cannon fodder

    drones

    LikeLike


  361. on May 12, 2009 at 7:31 pm cptnapalm

    Brief, humorous conversation I just had at work:

    Went for a smoke and was chatting with this older, black dude. Told him the story of the guy that wound up having to pay child support to the guy that was having sex with his wife.

    His response: “I love my wife, but you cannot trust a woman. They are evil.”

    LikeLike


  362. on May 12, 2009 at 7:32 pm lurker

    Xsplat, to make the situations equivalent, the government would have to require you to pay for the beer whether you drank it or not.

    LikeLike


  363. on May 12, 2009 at 7:32 pm Chuck

    doug1:

    fwiw, here’s what I said, i think you misread it.

    ” wonder how long it is before our “masculinity movement” turns into a slightly higher T-leveled feminist movement, complete with shirllness.”

    i was saying that i don’t want some kind of men’s movement to resemble just a response to the feminist movement, in that i don’t want to take the same tactics they have used in order to hijack society.

    the feminist movement’s strongest weapon was to paint women as the victim, but as anyone who knows anything about women, their victimization has long been overblown. T aka Ricky Raw linked to Chinweizu’s book called “Anatomy of Female Power” and Warren Farrel wrote a book in the early 1990s called “The Myth of Male Power”.

    I think it’s no shock that the pioneers of feminism and the most ardent supporters of it today are the women who would have no ability to “control” men through the institutions of cradle, womb, and kitchen that Chinweizu discusses. Feminists are either ugly or lesbian which would decrease their ability to wield power. (Ok, to test this theory, Roissy should post pictures of Women’s Studies majors to test their attractiveness…guaranteed they will be 2+ points lower on the attractiveness scale).

    Since these women could not gain power through traditional means, they had to convince other women, some men, and the courts to grant them power. The shit has been bastardized ever since.

    LikeLike


  364. on May 12, 2009 at 7:33 pm Obsidian

    I must say, that the level of angst on the part of quite a few lady members of the forum, is quite fascinating to take note of. Interesting.

    Kim, I wouldn’t be so sure about “MPT never happening”. We said the same thing about the Wall coming down in Berlin, that happened; we used to say that a Black Man could never be President of the United States, that’s happened, and so on. MPT WILL happen, simply because the means and demand is there. As has been previously noted, home test kits are already widely available.

    And besides, whether or the State is concerned about being stuck with the bill is irrelevant, since Women are fully self supporting now, yes? So again, what’s the problem here? Please explain, clarify and elaborate?

    O

    LikeLike


  365. on May 12, 2009 at 7:34 pm kim

    Obsidian,

    It’s not so much about rates as it is about legislation. Like I said, there is no way to prove it, but in my opinion, it seems like a government that would pass MPT would also ban legal abortion. How it would affect the rates, I don’t know?

    LikeLike


  366. on May 12, 2009 at 7:34 pm lurker

    Gunslingergregi, very good idea. Women have no sense of justice, but they have every sense of empathy for kids. Well, sometimes.

    LikeLike


  367. on May 12, 2009 at 7:35 pm xsplat

    Captain Searing Pain

    His response: “I love my wife, but you cannot trust a woman. They are evil.”

    Another window letting in the light and fresh sea breeses. Devilish whores, all of them. No matter how much they are in love with you, and no matter what their upbringing, or how religious. Its in their dna.

    LikeLike


  368. on May 12, 2009 at 7:35 pm Chic noir

    off topic- kim I like your tumblar

    on topic: Lurker are you Catholic?

    Kim, I think you may be on to something about some men prolife men being for MPT.

    LikeLike


  369. on May 12, 2009 at 7:36 pm lurker

    O, don’t be unfair, you’re makign a woman explain her logic?

    “We said the same thing about the Wall coming down in Berlin, that happened; we used to say that a Black Man could never be President of the United States, that’s happened, and so on.”

    —yes, note who said those things: liberals. Liberals always believe in the existence, always, of communism, racism, sexism. Hence why Kim has to see sexism/anti-woman in this, as opposed to pro-men/pro-child: because that’s all she knows.

    It’s like asking a puppy to read shakespeare when you ask her to explain herself.

    LikeLike


  370. on May 12, 2009 at 7:37 pm doug1

    Kim

    MTP is something people can wish for all they want but it’ll never happen. It doesn’t matter whether I support it or not, there is no way that would ever be passed in the US or any Western civilization. Sorry.

    Utter rubbish.

    Of course it could be passed.

    No the mood isn’t there right now to pass it, but that hardly means that can’t change.

    LikeLike


  371. on May 12, 2009 at 7:37 pm Tood

    kim is busted.

    anony is terrible. What a horrid monster.

    It is funny how many women are refusing to stand up and say that it is wrong for a man to pay if the child is not his, and his trust has been betrayed.

    Women are truly lacking in moral fiber.

    Islam….Islam…..Islam…..

    LikeLike


  372. on May 12, 2009 at 7:38 pm Chic noir

    kim “MTP is something people can wish for all they want but it’ll never happen”

    *puts hand on kim’s shoulder*
    my queen, never doubt what people can do when they come together, the civil rights movement, women’s movement and elderly people with money collecting social security Medicare. If enough men get togeather, they can make a change.

    LikeLike


  373. on May 12, 2009 at 7:38 pm lurker

    Me? Yes I am, Chuck. But banning of abortion desire comes from science, not religion. Roissy’s an atheist. We both agree.

    LikeLike


  374. on May 12, 2009 at 7:39 pm whiskey

    Xsplat — Mongolia was around the 12th Century, Ghenghis’ time, the ruler of pretty much the known World, from Poland east to China, from Iraq to Siberia and into India.

    The inability to sustain the Mongol Empire and keep pace with technology was part and parcel of nearly all the descendants of Mongols being Ghenghis Khan.

    Think: Genetic Bottleneck. If Khan is the only one making babies, only his genes get expressed later in generation after generation. Which means valuable genes for abstract thinking, like say, how to adapt Mongol ponies and mobility to challenges from outsiders, in places where the Mongol composite bow just is not effective, are simply lacking.

    Europe in the 1100’s was the same as Mongolia, in terms of literacy, achievement, and so on. Because most men in Europe under enforced monogamy reproduced, there was no genetic bottleneck and genes that were favorable for say, taking Chinese wooden block printing and creating the same with moveable type with lead, or improving constantly firearms, got expressed. Icky Darwinism but there you have it — the larger the gene pool the more likely favorable genes will get expressed. Since you never know what will turn up.

    Female paradises of lots of Alpha men tend to be poor, violent, and stable, in that they last forever, but are often conquered. Guys like Shaka Zulu, Nebuchadnezzer, Xerxes, and Khan can create a basic pattern that lasts but their descendants tend to be conquered by cooperative beta men.

    As for geeks, enjoy their fruits now. There will be few geeks after them, because geeks do POORLY in the marketplace, women avoid having kids with them like the plague, preferring guys lke Roissy. Who aren’t going to invent new ways to cure cancer or produce energy.

    Unless forced to, women will never mate with geeky guys.

    LikeLike


  375. on May 12, 2009 at 7:40 pm Tood

    So again, what’s the problem here? Please explain, clarify and elaborate?

    No chance. You are asking a Westernized woman to not be a hypocrite. Impossible. See how much of a total failure feminism is?

    No straight answer will be forthcoming from kim.

    LikeLike


  376. on May 12, 2009 at 7:40 pm kim

    Lurker,
    I never said this was for the children. It’s about the government wanting to know more than they need to.

    Obsidian,
    Those things you listed are all movements in a progressive direction. MPT would be a huge step backwards. MPT is like something out of Orwell’s 1984.

    LikeLike


  377. on May 12, 2009 at 7:40 pm lurker

    Chic, not chuck.

    But I love how women try to twist MPT into abortion—again, with no logic—to drive a wedge here. isn’t that just like a woman?

    LikeLike


  378. on May 12, 2009 at 7:41 pm xsplat

    Lurker

    Xsplat, to make the situations equivalent, the government would have to require you to pay for the beer whether you drank it or not.

    It seems your drunk instead of me, for a change.

    WTF? It’s only a few bucks. Get it done yourself. You don’t need anyones permission. Just do it. What on earth does any government agency have to do with it?

    And as regards to the state extracting welfare and child support, get a passport.

    People are talking about reforming a broken system. More power to you, but it seems silly to me. Just get and use your passport.

    LikeLike


  379. on May 12, 2009 at 7:42 pm lurker

    “It’s about the government wanting to know more than they need to.”

    —the father needs to know, as does the government. By your twisted feminist logic, they shouldn’t know the names of the parents either.

    The government needs to know who the parents are so they know whom to send the bill to.

    LikeLike


  380. on May 12, 2009 at 7:43 pm Obsidian

    Kim,
    Again, I don’t follow your logic because I fail to see the linakge btw MPT and Abortion, one way or another. As far as I see it they are two completely different issues, and should be viewed in that context. However, if one wants to make a case for the role Abortion could play in the case of widespread MPT, one could plausibly argue that if anything, Abortion rates would likely go up, since a potentially cheating spouse knows she is likely to be found out if she carries a suspect pregnancy to term. Since married Women already have the right to abort w/o the knowledge or permission of their hubbies in any event, again I fail to see what the problem is here.

    I remain somewhat in a fog as to the clarity of your argument. I need more clarification, please?

    O

    LikeLike


  381. on May 12, 2009 at 7:43 pm lurker

    xsplat, not the cost here. Its that many betas are too timid or fooled to do it. A required MPT would break many men of their weird worship of women. And force sluts into poverty.

    LikeLike


  382. on May 12, 2009 at 7:44 pm Gunslingergregi

    “””””””””””””””””””Chic Noir
    The fact that a few men are throwing around rape with ease makes me wonder whose really reading this blog?”””””””””””””””””””””

    False accusations of rape happen too often. Lies from woman about life changeing events for men happen too often. We need solid lie dtector tests for these woman when they are accusing someone of anything. (sexual harrassment,rape,stealing, cuckhold) Anything.

    LikeLike


  383. on May 12, 2009 at 7:44 pm lurker

    O, no fair, you’re using logic to bash her pretty little whorish skull in!

    LikeLike


  384. on May 12, 2009 at 7:44 pm Tood

    kim wrote :

    Those things you listed are all movements in a progressive direction. MPT would be a huge step backwards. MPT is like something out of Orwell’s 1984.

    It seems you don’t care about men’s rights at all. You are just as bad as Southern KKK whites who subjected blacks to Jim Crow laws.

    I suppose you oppose men secretly getting the DNA test done on the kid that is supposedly theirs too?

    LikeLike


  385. on May 12, 2009 at 7:44 pm roissy

    clio:
    The reason compulsory paternity testing won’t ever be imposed (I think), is that it isn’t in the state’s interest to impose it.

    the state is the fist of the public. if enough of the public decides that MPT is in its interest, then it will be in the state’s interest by default.
    but in the narrow sense, you may have a point. it is in the state’s interest to keep beta males married and working to the bone chained to the machinery of society to support their families even if it means said betas live under the cloud of a great lie. what’s the truth to a few individuals when the glorious collective of big brother needs their sacrifice?

    What if the baby turned out not to be related to his “legal” father but his mother couldn’t or wouldn’t name the biological father?

    wouldn’t? the man is immediately freed of all obligations to her or the bastard.
    couldn’t? same as above. sucks to be her! oh well, i guess she should have thought it through before auditioning for the part of town orifice.

    Or the biological father refused to be tested?

    see above. again, if the whore wants to avoid a situation where the man whom she fingers as the biological father refuses to get tested, she should have thought of that potential fallout before spreading her legs.
    ultimately, what you cannot get away from, despite your best efforts, is the fact that a woman cheating on her husband and conceiving a child by another man is wholly responsible for the world of shit she puts herself in.
    the government, the beta chump, the universe, is not going to relieve her of moral and practical culpability.

    otoh, if you prefer that the state continues to treat women like children, then perhaps we can extend this paternal magnanimity to women’s right to vote and let the grownups vote for them?

    The state would then be stuck with the child-support costs.

    this is where you let your religious impulse get the best of you.
    the only one who should get stuck with anything is the whore. if the kid suffers because she is an unfit mother of few resources, well… tough shit. cull the herd.

    I don’t think that any of this is fair to men, mind you.

    coulda fooled me.

    I’d stop it if I could do so by fiat, and I would definitely tell that Post columnist to take a hike. In fact, I will do so, just to prove that I do in fact support men in this situation.

    you’ll be too nice about it. now my method, while i’m under no pretense that it will change minds, sure does fill me with a warm glow!

    LikeLike


  386. on May 12, 2009 at 7:45 pm xsplat

    Tood

    No chance. You are asking a Westernized woman to not be a hypocrite.

    Tood – you make the same mistake feminists do. Attributing to culture what is genetic.

    Women of all cultures are hypocrites. Much more so in non western cultures.

    I know it’s hard, guys. I know its very difficult. Women are not like us. At all. They don’t think like we do. They only pretend to do that.

    LikeLike


  387. on May 12, 2009 at 7:45 pm lurker

    Yes, tood. Don’t you knwo women never lie?

    LikeLike


  388. on May 12, 2009 at 7:46 pm doug1

    Kim–

    Even if Mandatory Paternity Testing doesn’t happen anytime soon, I think it becoming a common practice among men to get such testing done IS likely.

    is there any man on this board who’s read Roissy’s post and the comments today who WOULD’T get paternity testing done.

    Sure it’s a long shot she’s done that to you, being such an awesome man and all, but why not be sure? What if she did?

    Actually I strongly recommend that all men reading here casually mention to their serious girlfriends, and seriously talk with their wives or live in girlfriends that any pregnancy would of course be subject to such a test, just as a matter of your assertion of strong male rights.

    Well I’ve always had these talks. There’s the abortion talk. “You get mistakenly pregnant when we both haven’t agreed to raise a kid together before hand, both of us, that includes me, and you’ll get an abortion, right? No question about that, right?” I’ve never lived with a woman who hasn’t agreed in a convincing manner, or for that matter had any long term relationship with one.

    LikeLike


  389. on May 12, 2009 at 7:46 pm gig

    a government that would pass MPT would also ban legal abortion

    true. but the first is MUCH easier than the second. So I would rewrite your phrase as:
    ” a government that would try to pass MPT and also ban legal abortion, would achieve the first and fail in the second “

    LikeLike


  390. on May 12, 2009 at 7:49 pm kim

    Tood,

    Do you care about women’s rights? It sure doesn’t seem like it. I do care about men’s rights, but I don’t think that mandatory paternity testing is fair. That’s a simple invasion of privacy. YOU can never understand a woman’s perspective on this because you can’t give birth. Go ahead, quote that and then leave your “oh, the typical feminist argument” bullshit, but it’s completely true.

    LikeLike


  391. on May 12, 2009 at 7:50 pm xsplat

    lurker

    xsplat, not the cost here. Its that many betas are too timid or fooled to do it. A required MPT would break many men of their weird worship of women. And force sluts into poverty.

    And why would I care? I have no solidarity with the menz. Let the betas lose out, if they are too stupid to learn a clue.

    There is a reason why Alphas get the pussy, you know – and it is NOT because of thuggish behaviour, as Whiskey purports. It is greater social skills, combined with above average skills in manipulating materials and wealth. Or any number of above average skills – intelligence included. Art, science, music, writing. There are alphas in all of the worthwhile human persuits, and they get laid more than most.

    What do I care if such alphas fuck married women? I don’t. I’d do it myself, and sometime try to do that.

    LikeLike


  392. on May 12, 2009 at 7:50 pm kim

    Sorry, unfair*

    LikeLike


  393. on May 12, 2009 at 7:52 pm kim

    Okay, wow. Take back the “sorry, unfair*” I can’t read anymore and am just making myself look like an idiot …it’s almost 1 AM and I’m going to bed.

    LikeLike


  394. on May 12, 2009 at 7:54 pm Chic noir

    Lurker But banning of abortion desire comes from science, not religion
    Kim MPT is like something out of Orwell’s 1984.
    Huh, you’ve thrown me with this. MPT isn’t government’s way of controlling a woman, it’s a man’s way of knowing if he is the dad or not. It’s allowing him his freedom to move on with his life if he is in fact not tied to you.

    But I love how women try to twist MPT into abortion—again, with no logic—to drive a wedge here. isn’t that just like a woman?
    Not really, some men will see MPT and abortion as issues linked. I’m for mpt and pro choice. Anyway, MPT is good just in the instance the child has any type of genetic disorders.

    xsplat WTF? It’s only a few bucks. Get it done yourself. You don’t need anyones permission. Just do it. What on earth does any government agency have to do with it?
    It like welfare mothers suing the government for not receiving enough benefits when they had the option to terminate or use bc like every other female.

    LikeLike


  395. on May 12, 2009 at 7:54 pm roissy

    chuck:
    comparing cuckolding to the male version of rape is a bad characterization. its obviously more akin to thievery or robbery,

    rape is thievery of a woman’s womb.
    cuckoldry is thievery of a man’s resources and life.

    the integrity of a woman’s womb is as precious to her as the lifeyears remaining and the accumulation of resources are to him.

    hence, why i believe it is a valid comparison.

    LikeLike


  396. on May 12, 2009 at 7:56 pm David Alexander

    For a man, a big part of the thrill of having kids is actually having sex with the said hot woman and essentially colonizing her body for nine months.

    I must admit that I enjoyed telling the mistress that I’d knock her up and she’d have my little mulatto kids. There’s something inherently masculine about that, and I’d imagine submitting to letting some guy dump his sperm in you is submissive and very feminine. As seen from websites dealing with the topic, some men (and women) do have an impregnation fetish.

    The ones who were worthless whores would end up giving up the kids to adoption, which is probably better than living with a skank mom.

    Given that there’s no market for black children, I’d wonder if it’s better to have the kids live with mom who is more likely to love them than in foster care or in orphanages.

    Sex-bots and artificial wombs? The bottom would fall out of the beta male provider supply.

    The problem is that artificial wombs and sex-bots aren’t mother replacements.

    Actually, it would lead to far fewer divorces, 70% of which are initiated by women, and nearly all of them in marriages with infants or young children. It would also lead many women to be more careful about who they marry.

    Of course, the unintended consequence is that women may not even give a beta male a chance for marriage, and stick to single motherhood to avoid even dealing with a beta male. Plus, quite frankly, I’m not interested in living with a woman who doesn’t love me, but only stays around because she can’t get child support. At that point, I’d pay her to go away and leave me alone than to continue the insulting fake marriage.

    Infidelity used to be way lower in fact.

    I suspect we were much better at hiding it.

    but for me I would much rather be sent to prison and anally raped than have my wife cheat on me and bear another man’s child

    From what my brother and cousin have noted about their stays in prison, I’d rather have my wife cheat on me. There’s still more freedom in a cuckold marriage than in any prison.

    LikeLike


  397. on May 12, 2009 at 7:57 pm Niko

    Sad thing is I live next to a guy who got cuckolded. The poor sod was dutiful to his wife’s child for 18 years after which she left him and went on a cock merri-go-round.

    The worst thing is everyone seems to have known except him. I didn’t have the heart to collapse his world after I found out so I let him be in his beta universe……..

    LikeLike


  398. on May 12, 2009 at 7:57 pm Gunslingergregi

    “””””””””””””Jam,
    I did tell her about the paternity testing and punishment for infidelity (which will be the same that many here have advocated for cuckoldry, lol), though.”””””””””””””

    That is it no lawyers needed between you and your woman. Just some basic laws of whats up.

    LikeLike


  399. on May 12, 2009 at 7:58 pm Chic noir

    kim That’s a simple invasion of privacy

    Which is no worse that having a 1/5 of your income stolen from you. Or having your emotions played with when you are 12 years into raising a child that isn’t yours.

    LikeLike


  400. on May 12, 2009 at 7:58 pm lurker

    “some men will see MPT and abortion as issues linked.”
    —betas

    “What do I care if such alphas fuck married women?”
    —I care if cheating whores are taken care of and lauded. They ought to be dragged low in the dirt.

    “MPT isn’t government’s way of controlling a woman, it’s a man’s way of knowing if he is the dad or not. It’s allowing him his freedom to move on with his life if he is in fact not tied to you.”
    —Don;t you understand that a feminist sees everything as part of her body when convenient? When the child is removed from the womb, tis still her body. When it goes to college,s till hers. Feminists are delusional.

    LikeLike


  401. on May 12, 2009 at 7:59 pm cptnapalm

    “That’s a simple invasion of privacy.”

    Who’s privacy is being violated. She’s named him the dad, so according to her, it is his kid. He is not getting any DNA from her at all. Just him and his kid. She is not involved at all. Who’s privacy is being violated?

    LikeLike


  402. on May 12, 2009 at 7:59 pm Tood

    kim squeaked :

    YOU can never understand a woman’s perspective on this because you can’t give birth.

    YOU, as a woman, cannot understand what it is like to be cuckolded. So far, you are on par with Southern White racists of the KKK in their treatment of blacks. You are trying to excuse the subjugation of men.

    You didn’t answer the question :

    Do you oppose men secretly getting the DNA test done on the kid that is supposedly theirs too?

    Answer it, bitch.

    LikeLike


  403. on May 12, 2009 at 8:00 pm doug1

    Dave from Hawaii

    Chicnoir: I predict that this comment box will reach 900 comments before 12 midnight. Wow, nothing gets men going like this topic.

    DfH: Sorta like the topic of rape with women, eh?

    Bullseye!!

    Hole in one.

    Home run with bases loaded.

    Kickoff Touchdown!

    LikeLike


  404. on May 12, 2009 at 8:01 pm Obsidian

    I see the argument that Clio presents, ie the role of the State and its interests in preventing MPT from happening, is w/all due respect a logical fallacy; I say this because there have been and are today many charitable organizations that have and continue to help Women in trouble w/babies. The problem is that these organizations are almost always religious in nature, and impose their standards of judgment, morality and guilt upon those they serve, and rightly so-their souls need just as help as their bodies.

    What a lot of Women want is assistance w/o any rebuke or censure, someting I’m completely against. Shaming has proven highly effective for the female half of the species. Severe penalties coupled w/powerful shaming measures will serve to drastically reduce these problems.

    While I’m on my logical kick, let me address another logical fallacy:

    And this is the “numerical” argument.

    Some argue that, because Paternity Fraud is relatively low in terms of documented occurance, we shouldn’t be too concerned about it; yet many of the very same people who take this view will often turn around and say, that one rape is one rape too many, and so on. I only ask that those who take this position be consistent in heir application of logic and reason: the issue wrt rape isn’t about numerical occurance, but about the egregious nature of the crime, a blight on the whole of society. I say the same is true for Paternity Fraud.

    O

    LikeLike


  405. on May 12, 2009 at 8:04 pm lurker

    O, sing it brutha.

    LikeLike


  406. on May 12, 2009 at 8:07 pm Bhetti

    Roissy et al, I think you’re reading into that advice column things that aren’t there for the sake of your anti-cuckoldry agenda. From my interpretation of femspeak: It was a nice way by the columnist of saying ‘make your own decisions, fool, and since you sound like a nice guy beta, remember your delicate feelings and get other guys e.g. lawyers to do the asshole work for you. I’m not going to advocate anything illegal here’ in typical advice columnist language. Maybe I’m projecting.

    Still, this does promote the cause for social acceptability of paternity tests which would help remove the ‘presumed guilty’ argument if its commonly or routinely done. The figures speak loudly about the necessity for them and the lie in the trust given. I don’t see women losing from this: either it’s his whereas you get to play martyr and noble pure woman (oh, honey, aren’t I the best loyalest wife evar? And you doubted me?) or… it’s not his. We’ve had cases in medschool where the kids would accidentally discover it by their blood types. xsplat/doug: Yeah, 10% is the commonly quoted figure at me, and the lecturers love to go ‘well, there are 200 of you in this lecture theatre…’. Reducing the rate’s all well and good.

    I’ve rather become inured to the massive misognyism and there’s too much to tackle today but let me just say, I really need to see a woman scorned who’s actually anywhere near as angry as this for some perspective, because this is alarming.

    Also, this was well-timed after my own post; it must be some sort of anti-cuckoldry vibe this week or some such.

    xsplat: Although I’m skeptical, tell me any venues I’d find you so that I can avoid rather than test your ‘I can get any woman’ skills.

    lurker: it’d have to be a pious woman from any religion in a Western country. If you went to pick off a muslim girl from a muslim country then that would be more true, and she’d already be compromising on muslim morality by being near you (unless she was given away unwillingly by family; not very Islamic but I heard it happens). I don’t know if I’d be a best bet, actually. I wouldn’t cheat and am apparently strongly socially conditioned against it according to doug but I’m also not the model religious girl. 30%’s a shocking figure; one that was definitely not true where I came from. Thinking about where I came from, the penalties on a cheating wife… it doesn’t even bear thinking about it. I haven’t even heard of any such scenarios and they’re usually generous with the female sexuality horror stories.

    chic: Lie detector tests work?

    havana: I’m not surprised. I was limited to a mere 3 kids maximum by a Westerner in terms of suggested family size. There were some things about traditional good Catholicism…

    Rape vs. cuckoldry: Give it a rest. Cuckoldry is its own crime, while sharing things with rape, it can be worse in some ways. It has aspects of violation, gross betrayal, humiliation, emotional damage and genetic threat to it. To think everything’s ok and then to discover how you were lied to and for so long and regarding the most important part of a long-term relationship by the one person you thought you could trust or even have power over…

    The main point is that YES, it should be taken SERIOUSLY for MEN like RAPE is taken SERIOUSLY for WOMEN.

    LikeLike


  407. on May 12, 2009 at 8:07 pm kim

    Chic,
    I’m glad you like my tumblr. Also, I don’t see how MPT isn’t the government controlling a woman. And I agree, it isn’t fair for men to have to raise children that aren’t theirs. It seems like a lot of commenters on here want to have their prospective or current wives/mother’s of their children, engage in a paternity test, and that’s fine. It should be up to the couple, not mandatory by the government. If the woman doesn’t want to take part, then maybe they shouldn’t have children together.

    Tood,

    “So far, you are on par with Southern White racists of the KKK in their treatment of blacks”

    wtf are you talking about??????????????????

    If the man wants to do that on his own, that’s fine. I’m not saying paternity testing is wrong, I’m saying that making it mandatory is wrong. If a man and woman want to do that, then that’s just fine, if a man wants to go and do it on his own, then that’s fine too. That’s completely different from the government forcing it on everyone.

    LikeLike


  408. on May 12, 2009 at 8:08 pm lurker

    Let me reiterate: the feminazi attempt to tie this to abortion will be a runnign theme in fighting this, if only to drive a wedge in the men’s movement on it. Be warned: it has nothing to do with abortion.

    LikeLike


  409. on May 12, 2009 at 8:08 pm doug1

    kim

    I do care about men’s rights, but I don’t think that mandatory paternity testing is fair. That’s a simple invasion of privacy. [doug editing: You mean like mandatory syphilis testing, initiated primarily for women? YOU can never understand a woman’s perspective on this because you can’t give birth. Go ahead, quote that and then leave your “oh, the typical feminist argument” bullshit, but it’s completely true.

    What a complete crock of shit – the italicized part.

    Now you’re thoroughly pissing me off.

    It’s looking like I was massively wrong about you.

    Well maybe you are too tired. Still telling.

    We’ll see.

    LikeLike


  410. on May 12, 2009 at 8:11 pm lurker

    Kim:
    “I don’t see how MPT isn’t the government controlling a woman.”
    —-You see. DNA testing a CHILD is controlling a WOMAN.

    Feminist logic at its finest.

    “It should be up to the couple, not mandatory by the government. ”
    —-If the government is going to force payment on someone, it is its duty to get it right.

    “I’m saying that making it mandatory is wrong.”
    –because my beta husband might find out why I get home so late….

    “That’s completely different from the government forcing it on everyone.”
    –when you bitches voluntarily give up child support and alimony, come talking to us, slut.

    LikeLike


  411. on May 12, 2009 at 8:12 pm David Alexander

    but in the narrow sense, you may have a point. it is in the state’s interest to keep beta males married and working to the bone chained to the machinery of society to support their families even if it means said betas live under the cloud of a great lie. what’s the truth to a few individuals when the glorious collective of big brother needs their sacrifice?

    That’s the problem with entire system. Cuckoldry relies on the greater system in general of beta males being sacrificed to keep society moving. As I’ve stated on numerous occasions, beta males sacrifice themselves for third rate sex from women who don’t love them, and nearly all of their pay being handed over to their wives and children. Guys like Whiskey and novaseeker may paint the ancien regime as a perfect world for beta males, but given that we know of the potential sexuality of women and their lack of desire for betas, no regime gives beta males any benefit.

    Because most men in Europe under enforced monogamy reproduced, there was no genetic bottleneck

    The question is how did Europe get to point where there was no genetic bottleneck?

    Unless forced to, women will never mate with geeky guys.

    But why should geeks be punished with women who aren’t attracted to them?

    LikeLike


  412. on May 12, 2009 at 8:13 pm gig

    chic

    nothing gets women going like topics about the disparate effects of aging on men and women

    LikeLike


  413. on May 12, 2009 at 8:14 pm lurker

    Kim, you paranoid delusional illogical bitch, go back to your womyn’s meeting, where this bullshit flows like wine.

    LikeLike


  414. on May 12, 2009 at 8:15 pm michael farris

    “Roissy et al, I think you’re reading into that advice column things that aren’t there for the sake of your anti-cuckoldry agenda.”

    He has an anti-cuckoldry agenda? I thought he had an anti-being-cuckolded agenda that was pretty ….. unexamined. If he’s been with half as many women as he claims the chances that he hasn’t cuckolded a married man or six (or fathered a child or four being raised by one of the betas he so despises) is pretty remote.

    Basically, men can’t demand faithfulness from wives unless they demand faithfulness from themselves and other men (or openly support the creation of a prostitute/mistress class).

    Basically neither men nor women are biologically programmed for marital faithfulness and demanding higher standards from one than the other is …. foolish.

    LikeLike


  415. on May 12, 2009 at 8:16 pm Tood

    when you bitches voluntarily give up child support and alimony, come talking to us, slut.

    Amen. I will say it as many times as necessary :

    Feminists are THE most hypocritical group in the world, bar none. More hypocritical than Palestinians, communists, Jesse Jackson, etc.

    Women haven’t really denied this accusation much either. They don’t mind being exposed as hypocrites.

    LikeLike


  416. on May 12, 2009 at 8:17 pm Chic noir

    bhetti chic: Lie detector tests work?
    they range from about 70%- to 90% effectiveness.

    Roissy she fingers as the biological father refuses to get tested, she should have thought of that potential fallout before spreading her legs.
    Can’t buy it. Why should a man refuse to be tested? It doesn’t hurt. He may refuse because he doesn’t want to take responsibility. If you refuses to take, then he should be forced to pay child support.

    ultimately, what you cannot get away from, despite your best efforts, is the fact that a woman cheating on her husband and conceiving a child by another man is wholly responsible for the world of shit she puts herself in.
    the government, the beta chump, the universe, is not going to relieve her of moral and practical culpability

    But sometimes it’s not a cheating woman. It’s a woman in a relationship with a man who for whatever reason, decides she is no longer the flavor of the month. Therefore, he dumps woman and child to move on to someone new.

    Doug “You get mistakenly pregnant when we both haven’t agreed to raise a kid together before hand, both of us, that includes me, and you’ll get an abortion, right? No question about that, right?”
    I agree the two of you should talk it over before hand but beware. For some women, even the most prochoice, Mother Nature kicks in and they will carry the child no matter what. All of the previous thoughts and opinions go out the door.

    Lurker Don;t you understand that a feminist sees everything as part of her body when convenient?
    Don’t let my Charlie Brown theory fool you, I’m a bit of a feminist myself. I just believe that fair is fair.

    LikeLike


  417. on May 12, 2009 at 8:18 pm lurker

    Roissy is a dreamer; he mentioned once in a post that a virgin girl is “sweet manna from heaven.” We would all love faithful, loving girl, its that women are not those images we’ve been taught to beleive in, but cunning, manipualtive whores.

    That said, Roissy wants to give us a wake up call, and release us from betahood, and under the thumb of women. A society ruled by men is always better. Hetakes our blinders off; he is a truth teller.

    LikeLike


  418. on May 12, 2009 at 8:18 pm Tupac Chopra

    Doug:

    Part of the reason you’re so beloved by many, and respected by all, who’ve read you enough here and/or at your own sites to have a good idea who you are (I mean aside from being hot and real smart)

    Give it up Doug, she’s mine all mine.

    Seriously though, I think Clio and Whiskey would be a good match. A blogosphere power couple.

    LikeLike


  419. on May 12, 2009 at 8:18 pm doug1

    Bhetti–

    xsplat: Although I’m skeptical, tell me any venues I’d find you so that I can avoid rather than test your ‘I can get any woman’ skills.

    You skepticism is more than merited, as you or anyone else will realize if they peruse his blog a bit. I could be real nasty but I guess I won’t be.

    LikeLike


  420. on May 12, 2009 at 8:19 pm lurker

    “Basically, men can’t demand faithfulness from wives unless they demand faithfulness from themselves and other men (or openly support the creation of a prostitute/mistress class).”
    –lmao. what a beta bitch.

    Men and women are different.

    A cheating woman is worse than a cheating man.

    Welcome to enlightenment, kiddo.

    LikeLike


  421. on May 12, 2009 at 8:20 pm xsplat

    Michal

    Basically neither men nor women are biologically programmed for marital faithfulness and demanding higher standards from one than the other is …. foolish.

    A rat bastard after my own heart.

    Although, I do believe some small proportion of men and women tend towards monogamy and family life. It seems those same people have an impossibly difficult time understanding that they are not the norm.

    They are so intensely interested in enforcing their social norms. I don’t get it.

    Live and get fucked over, and get wise.

    LikeLike


  422. on May 12, 2009 at 8:23 pm doug1

    Tupac–

    Give it up Doug, she’s mine all mine.

    Seriously though,

    LoL Tupac.

    I’m in the respect camp. Your (and Whiskey’s) coast is clear, re: me. Not trying to muscle in bro. (LoL)

    LikeLike


  423. on May 12, 2009 at 8:24 pm lurker

    “they range from about 70%- to 90% effectiveness.”

    lol, no. lie detectors are notoriously unreliable. That’s why courts don’t accept them as evidence. try 50%, at best.

    Maury Povich notwithstanding.

    LikeLike


  424. on May 12, 2009 at 8:25 pm xsplat

    doug1

    Bhetti–

    xsplat: Although I’m skeptical, tell me any venues I’d find you so that I can avoid rather than test your ‘I can get any woman’ skills.

    You skepticism is more than merited, as you or anyone else will realize if they peruse his blog a bit. I could be real nasty but I guess I won’t be.

    You’d both be right to be skeptical of my exageration. But it was merely an exageration – not a falsehood. Religion is a weak barrier to seduction.

    And if you are in the mood to be nasty, Doug, go for it. Most of what I leave up on the blog I’m content with – so have at it.

    LikeLike


  425. on May 12, 2009 at 8:25 pm Rum

    Kim

    You are doing great work convincing the men here – all of them – that talking to women about this is pointless. You keep saying, in one way or another, that only a fool would believe anything a woman says about true paternity and then you want to talk about what is “fair”?
    You must be a little drunk because you keep giving away the main female “secret-game-plan” without much prompting or pressure.

    LikeLike


  426. on May 12, 2009 at 8:26 pm Chic noir

    kim It should be up to the couple, not mandatory by the government. If the woman doesn’t want to take part, then maybe they shouldn’t have children together.
    Who is the “they” that shouldn’t have children together.

    Hypothetically speaking, I can married to PA but decide that I want to sample MU on Tuesday and Whiskey on Wednesday followed by Roissy on Friday. There is nothing PA can do about it if I fall pregnant, nothing. He will be forced to wait on the side with the other three for the DNA results.

    bottom line, even after having a talk, it’s still the woman’s body to a make decision if and when she will have a child. The best thing men can do is use a condom in addition to male pill or vasectomy. I’m getting sick of hearing men say “she trapped me” anyway. Shit sounds very betaish.

    Lurker what’s up with the heavy name calling. If you don’t agree with kim fine you don’t agree. There is no need to call her everything but a child of God.

    LikeLike


  427. on May 12, 2009 at 8:27 pm lurker

    I love the feminist trope about “invasion of privacy.” Nobody knows what it means, everyone has their own definition, and it sounds awful, but it has no basis in law or fact.

    Just like everythign else feminists say.

    LikeLike


  428. on May 12, 2009 at 8:27 pm Marcus Aureliette

    kim:
    I do care about men’s rights, but I don’t think that mandatory paternity testing is fair. That’s a simple invasion of privacy. YOU can never understand a woman’s perspective on this because you can’t give birth.

    How is it any more an invasion of privacy than any other medical test done in the course of bringing a child to term? It’s in everyone’s best interest to have that data on the table, but let’s be honest: if a woman is, in fact, trying to pass off another man’s child as her unsuspecting husband’s, clearly the unsuspecting husband has far and away the most to lose by that deception. It is patently unfair that any man should get saddled with that responsibility, and if taking a simple test will spare that happening, how can you justify not testing?

    Also, just to be clear: being capable of giving birth has absolutely nothing to do with the question at hand, and I say that as a fertile female.

    LikeLike


  429. on May 12, 2009 at 8:28 pm schoolboy

    Kim is the typical illogical slut.

    Thats, that. Now about those MPT at CVS?

    LikeLike


  430. on May 12, 2009 at 8:28 pm roissy

    m. farris:
    He has an anti-cuckoldry agenda? I thought he had an anti-being-cuckolded agenda that was pretty ….. unexamined. If he’s been with half as many women as he claims the chances that he hasn’t cuckolded a married man or six (or fathered a child or four being raised by one of the betas he so despises) is pretty remote.

    i’ve never claimed to be a good man. i have slept with married and taken women. in those cases, i was not informed of their marital or relationship status until after penis had crossed the plane of vagina. i can’t say i’ve never targeted a taken woman, (who can remember all their conquests? not i), but i can say with some confidence that i generally refrain from the practice. it’s not kosher.

    i can also tell you that none of the married women i banged insisted i wear a condom, not even on the first night.
    now why would that be?
    things that make you go hmm….

    LikeLike


  431. on May 12, 2009 at 8:28 pm michael farris

    “Men and women are different.
    A cheating woman is worse than a cheating man.”

    Uh….. unless the man is gay or paying for it, a cheating man is often going to be cheating with a woman who’s also cheating. You can’t have horn dog alphas without having cheating women and pretending that Game can exist without cuckolded men in LTR’s or changeling children is just …. not realistic.

    LikeLike


  432. on May 12, 2009 at 8:29 pm lurker

    “Lurker what’s up with the heavy name calling.”
    —women want to argue like men? Then grow some balls and get over it.

    “If you don’t agree with kim fine you don’t agree.”
    –I agree with nothing that no-good cunt has said.

    “There is no need to call her everything but a child of God.”
    —save your hand-holding and “no put downs” for kindergarten and the sewing circle; men insult, deal with it.

    LikeLike


  433. on May 12, 2009 at 8:32 pm lurker

    “Uh….. unless the man is gay or paying for it, a cheating man is often going to be cheating with a woman who’s also cheating.”
    —Roissy’s post immediately above yours proves you wrong.

    “You can’t have horn dog alphas without having cheating women and pretending that Game can exist without cuckolded men in LTR’s or changeling children is just …. not realistic.”
    —wrong again, beta boy.

    LikeLike


  434. on May 12, 2009 at 8:35 pm Bhetti

    Sorry, m. farris, I keep forgetting these fine distinctions suffered of ‘do not do unto me what I allow to be done to others’.

    I’m glad roissy tries to avoid it.

    roissy: Just to confirm for the general public, you DID wear a condom, anyway?

    LikeLike


  435. on May 12, 2009 at 8:37 pm Obsidian

    Kim,
    I am also having trouble following your argument, that MPT is somehow tantamount to a rolling back on Women’s Rights-could you please specify, in what way? The Woman has chosen to carry the child to term and is indeed the mother, these facts are not in dispute; what *is*, is the putative father’s status as the de jure/de facto father. This is what daddy testing solves.

    Again, I am havin trouble following your arguments in opposition to MPT. I await a more thorough clarification of your views.

    O

    LikeLike


  436. on May 12, 2009 at 8:38 pm cptnapalm

    “it’s still the woman’s body to a make decision if and when she will have a child.”

    In that case, there will be no need for a paternity test as this logically eliminates all responsibility from men. After all, how can you have responsibilities for the decisions of someone else?

    LikeLike


  437. on May 12, 2009 at 8:39 pm lurker

    O, you know how we ignore tokyojesus/contrarian, because he’s just a troll? Same rule applies with kim. She’s just spitting nonsense, and when called on it, she’ll spit it again.

    LikeLike


  438. on May 12, 2009 at 8:40 pm lurker

    cptnapalm:
    “After all, how can you have responsibilities for the decisions of someone else?”
    —-you clearly have not read any feminist literature. Men are always at fault.

    LikeLike


  439. on May 12, 2009 at 8:41 pm michael farris

    “Roissy’s post immediately above yours proves you wrong.”

    You mean the one where he admits he’s had sex with married women (with no condom) and shown no concern about or interest in the possible children that resulted (and who will, if they’re lucky, never know he existed? That post?

    Listen I’m sympathetic to the human condition and the very different sexual interests of men and women. I just don’t have much sympathy for willful ignorance and it takes willful ignorance to simultaneously favor sexual freedom for men (the essence of ‘game’) and want monogamy from the women one is in a LTR with.

    Basically, if men want absolute monogamy from wives then they’re going have to get used to the idea that a) they’re not gonna get any till they’re married of b) they’re gonna get nailed for child support if their wild oats can be traced to them (unless there’s an open prostitute class which is problematic in lots of ways).

    LikeLike


  440. on May 12, 2009 at 8:41 pm lurker

    Bhetti, my love, when is our wedding, dearie?

    LikeLike


  441. on May 12, 2009 at 8:42 pm doug1

    schoolboy

    Kim is the typical illogical slut.

    Thats, that. Now about those MPT at CVS?

    Consider this as friendly advice from an uncle you like. It’s not intended as a diss.

    Don’t call Kim a slut. She probably isn’t. Doesn’t sound like one. In fact she sounds very much not like one. So if so, she’s coming from a very different place than you’ve announced.

    So calling her a slut if I’m right (and I tend to be on these kind of things) is very counter productive with her. It might get you some street cred with with lowest common denominator of men, but what is that really worth? It’s easy to get in much better ways.

    Illogical yes. Actually she often hasn’t been. But she sure was lately, especially not long before signing off.

    Rolling that around in your mind and saying something that gets at it is far more powerful.

    Just some friendly thoughts.

    LikeLike


  442. on May 12, 2009 at 8:44 pm omw

    I don’t even see what all the heat is about here. Women, if you’ve got nothing to hide, all a paternity test does is pay for a little domestic peace of mind.

    Guys, if you’re either practically or ideologically concerned about it, you can get it done pretty cheap on your own.

    As for the State, it cares about none of you. It exists to serve its own ends.

    LikeLike


  443. on May 12, 2009 at 8:45 pm lurker

    “You mean the one where he admits he’s had sex with married women (with no condom) and shown no concern about or interest in the possible children that resulted (and who will, if they’re lucky, never know he existed? That post?”
    —yes, beta, the one where didn’t know she was married and avoids having sex with women he knows are taken. There are plenty of sluts out there he bangs who aren’t married.

    “I just don’t have much sympathy for willful ignorance and it takes willful ignorance to simultaneously favor sexual freedom for men (the essence of ‘game’) and want monogamy from the women one is in a LTR with.”
    —Well, as I stated, many here would be satisified with a faithful, loving virgin who acts like a submissive woman.

    And, as stated, those who would not are spreading their seed; cheating women are forcing men to rtaise a child not their own. One is a good natural instinct, the other is not.

    “if men want absolute monogamy from wives then they’re going have to get used to the idea that a) they’re not gonna get any till they’re married.”
    —moron. men here don’t want monogomaous gfs, they just want to bang. Men who want to get married want monogomous wives, which are rarer than they protray themselves.

    LikeLike


  444. on May 12, 2009 at 8:49 pm lurker

    doug1, are you insane:

    “Don’t call Kim a slut. She probably isn’t. Doesn’t sound like one. In fact she sounds very much not like one.”

    —yes, she just wants to deny men the right to not pay for a child not theirs and allow a cheating wife to live high on his hog and spread her legs. Also, she wants to lie and somehow bizarrely claim this is related to *her* privacy or abortion.

    The onyl women that panicky that we’re in favor it? Sluts.

    “So calling her a slut if I’m right (and I tend to be on these kind of things) is very counter productive with her. ”
    —logic is counter-productive with kim.

    “Actually she often hasn’t been. But she sure was lately, especially not long before signing off.”
    –lmao rofl. No, far from it.

    “Rolling that around in your mind and saying something that gets at it is far more powerful. ”
    —have you not been here while O and I ripped her aknew with basic facts.

    doug, really, are you going soft?

    LikeLike


  445. on May 12, 2009 at 8:51 pm doug1

    Lurker–

    doug, really, are you going soft?

    No, I’m being smart.

    I comes naturally.

    LikeLike


  446. on May 12, 2009 at 8:51 pm doug1

    It

    LikeLike


  447. on May 12, 2009 at 8:52 pm lurker

    “No, I’m being smart.”

    –sucking up to a screeching feminist skank isn’t smart at all.

    LikeLike


  448. on May 12, 2009 at 8:52 pm Bhetti

    lurker: Our wedding? Has noone supplied you with muslim proposal techniques: Where is the request for my mother’s number? Wasn’t I relegated to slut, now, anyway? Don’t you hate me too much as an inferior female to have to spend eternity with me?

    All irrelevant, since I’m set ruthlessly/heartlessly on doug.

    schoolboy: CVS = chorionic villus sampling? If so, increased risk of miscarriage makes it unethical. It has to wait until its born.

    LikeLike


  449. on May 12, 2009 at 8:53 pm lurker

    Doug1, kim is a typical illogical slut. She is as ignorable as contrarian.

    LikeLike


  450. on May 12, 2009 at 8:53 pm michael farris

    “Men who want to get married want monogomous wives, which are rarer than they protray themselves.”

    ITA. Like I said, neither men nor women are biologically programmed for monogamous marriage (for different reasons) and both men and women want and expect higher standards of behavior from their partners than they’re willing to adhere to themselves (again in different ways).

    Basically men have very low standards beyond ‘willing’ while women realize that some guys who might be fun sex partners are probably not good husband/father material (and don’t require or expect that of them).

    Basically, I don’t idealize either male or female behavior, it is what it is and the wise person doesn’t expect seals to behave like buffaloes or buffaloes like seals.

    LikeLike


  451. on May 12, 2009 at 8:53 pm omw

    CVS: the American drugstore chain.

    LikeLike


  452. on May 12, 2009 at 8:54 pm cptnapalm

    “It”

    Wow, dude…. profound. 🙂

    LikeLike


  453. on May 12, 2009 at 8:54 pm lurker

    bhetti, why do you deny your lust for me?

    LikeLike


  454. on May 12, 2009 at 8:55 pm Chic noir

    Tupac Seriously though, I think Clio and Whiskey would be a good match. A blogosphere power couple.
    *slings Tupac into a chair law and order style*
    Are you serious??? Are you out of your darn mind???
    Don’t you ever utter such garbage again for as long as you live. Whiskey is mine, all mine.
    1. lurker Men and women are different.
    A cheating woman is worse than a cheating man.

    You and a few other men here are beating a dead horse. Women under 30 don’t agree, even if she tells you she agrees, she is lying. Hoing is hoing. A cheating man cheats with another man’s woman (or potential woman). There are 6 billion of us and it’s pretty much evenly divided in number according to gender so there aren’t enough women around for men to get experience with, before they take anther man’s woman.
    michael Basically neither men nor women are biologically programmed for marital faithfulness and demanding higher standards from one than the other is …. foolish.
    agreed but for some people this small truth is so painful.
    Sometimes I wonder what men would do if women went on a poon strike. Watch the alpha of alpha become beta for just a taste. All least it will help bring the people back in line morally riiiigggghhhhtttt.

    LikeLike


  455. on May 12, 2009 at 8:55 pm Bhetti

    lurker: lust does not a marriage make.

    LikeLike


  456. on May 12, 2009 at 8:55 pm omw

    Chic’s right about the Pill, though. I swear that stuff works primarily by annihilating your libido.

    LikeLike


  457. on May 12, 2009 at 8:56 pm Chic noir

    omw
    CVS: the American drugstore chain.

    yes

    LikeLike


  458. on May 12, 2009 at 8:56 pm michael farris

    “the one where didn’t know she was married and avoids having sex with women he knows are taken”

    and carefully avoids finding out she’s married (or otherwise taken) after the jizzbomb horizon …..

    LikeLike


  459. on May 12, 2009 at 8:56 pm schoolboy

    doug1:

    Just wanted to get this topic moving by asking a question. Everyone is attacking kim but it won’t work in changing how she views things. That is all.

    No more friendly thoughts. *shudders*

    LikeLike


  460. on May 12, 2009 at 8:56 pm Bhetti

    OMW, thank you! Too many abbreviations in medicine.

    You guys better not think about it anyway.

    LikeLike


  461. on May 12, 2009 at 8:56 pm lurker

    “Basically men have very low standards beyond ‘willing’ while women realize that some guys who might be fun sex partners are probably not good husband/father material (and don’t require or expect that of them).”

    —translation: men want to spread their seed,a nd good women want to be choosy. Skanks are not choosy. Cheating broads are liars and try to get good men to take care of children not their own.

    Women who cheat on husbands are filthy whores.

    “Basically, I don’t idealize either male or female behavior, it is what it is and the wise person doesn’t expect seals to behave like buffaloes or buffaloes like seals.”
    —-WTF kidn of half-assed anaology is that. I expect my women to act like dogs, myself. beta boy. 😉

    LikeLike


  462. on May 12, 2009 at 9:00 pm lurker

    “and carefully avoids finding out she’s married (or otherwise taken) after the jizzbomb horizon …..”
    —lol. Jealous, beta boy?

    “Women under 30 don’t agree”
    –my gosh,a flighty skanky broad won’t stop hoing? please, tell me more, truth teller.

    ” Hoing is hoing. A cheating man cheats with another man’s woman (or potential woman). ”
    –some who don’t know. Just liek Roissy didn’t know.

    “There are 6 billion of us and it’s pretty much evenly divided in number according to gender so there aren’t enough women around for men to get experience with, before they take anther man’s woman.”
    –yes, but if she cheats when married she is worse.

    A man who cheats is acting naturally.

    A woman who does is acting unnaturally. And poorly.

    End scene. You lose.

    LikeLike


  463. on May 12, 2009 at 9:00 pm Chic noir

    first :lurker
    Doug1, kim is a typical illogical slut. She is as ignorable as contrarian.

    then: lurker
    bhetti, why do you deny your lust for me?

    *looks at lurker like the oracle from the matrix*
    *takes long pull of cigarette*
    *exhales over shoulder*

    Sometimes son, we can answer our own questions if only we take a deep look at ourselves.

    LikeLike


  464. on May 12, 2009 at 9:01 pm schoolboy

    LOL bhetti aren’t you from london?

    CVS is an american drug store. Like “Boots The chemist” in london.

    LikeLike


  465. on May 12, 2009 at 9:02 pm lurker

    lol chic. quoting crap like the Matrix? Maybe next you can use an oh so intelligent Beyonce song in your argument.

    “Sometimes son, we can answer our own questions if only we take a deep look at ourselves.”
    —Chic, I am a man. Men cannot be sluts, unless they are gay bottoms, which I am not.

    Women who sleep around are sluts.

    A woman feeling desire for a man is not sluttish for the desire.

    i know that hurts your tiny female brain but try to keep up.

    LikeLike


  466. on May 12, 2009 at 9:03 pm omw

    OMW, thank you! Too many abbreviations in medicine.

    You guys better not think about it anyway.

    Girl, I try to avoid thinking, but the unseemly habit keeps creeping back. 😦

    Do they still do lobotomies?

    LikeLike


  467. on May 12, 2009 at 9:04 pm Chic noir

    A woman who does is acting unnaturally.
    not true. Even lesbians cheat sometimes. I understand if you don’t want to believe this thought.

    A woman can be married to Denzel but if Reggie Bush walks past, she will think, my God that boy is fine. Followed by the whole imagine what he looks like naked, the size of it, wonder if he is any good in bed blah blah blah. The thing is, will she act out on it. Probably not and I would like to believe that average man doesn’t act on his impulses if he has Naomi and Tyra walks by.

    LikeLike


  468. on May 12, 2009 at 9:06 pm David Alexander

    Whiskey is mine, all mine.

    Whiskey is much too Scots-Irish to be associated with a Negro woman.

    LikeLike


  469. on May 12, 2009 at 9:06 pm omw

    Aw, lurker, surely you of all people, aren’t going the Natural=Good route.

    LikeLike


  470. on May 12, 2009 at 9:07 pm lurker

    “not true. Even lesbians cheat sometimes.”
    –when did I say it didn’t happen that dykes acted like dykes?

    “A woman can be married to Denzel but if Reggie Bush walks past, she will think, my God that boy is fine.”
    –Chic, I know you’re slow, but you do get the difference between “feeling” something and “acting on that feeling” right?

    And any woman lame enough to find reggie bush attractive is pathetic.

    “The thing is, will she act out on it. Probably not ”
    –so? again, chic, you are wrong; I never said being attracted to someone else is slutty. Acting on it is.

    Dumbass woman.

    LikeLike


  471. on May 12, 2009 at 9:07 pm michael farris

    “Skanks are not choosy”

    Talk about naive ……

    When men give in to their basest biological urges (spreadin’ the seed whenever and wherever possible) they’re dopes (maybe happy dopes like Roissy, but dopes nonetheless) if they don’t expect women to give in to _their_ basest biological urges (find a good, dependable day-to-day partner to bond emotionally with while still having the occasional fling with a charming rascal).

    Expecting one side of the male/female dynamic to suddenly develop higher morals is a fool’s game and wanting the state to enforce one side or the other is morally reprehensible (I’ll agree that the current state of affairs is unfair to men, making it unfair to women is not the answer).

    Go ahead, demand MPT (I have nothing whatsoever against that, really, none as long as it’s 100% exception proof) but be aware that any casual squirt in the dark could come back to haunt you bad. The alternative is to accept that not every man is going to raise his biological child (and that some of one’s biological children will be raised by other men).

    LikeLike


  472. on May 12, 2009 at 9:08 pm lurker

    Natural for a man=spread his seed.

    natural for a woman: choose her mate carefully, not have just any man’s kids.

    Natural.

    LikeLike


  473. on May 12, 2009 at 9:09 pm Bhetti

    Yes, from London, thus the ‘WTF?’ at ‘CVS’ which I think I’ve had three corrections for now! Nice of you to know about Boots, although its so bastardised as a store that I remember one distinct incident where I was looking for a chemist and there was a Boots RIGHT THERE which I went past a couple of times. Forgetting what it was.

    Yeah, I’m not that clever. Right, I’m going to sleep.

    OMW: no lobotomies done in this country, to my knowledge, no. Now, I don’t rightly know what ye yankees do.

    LikeLike


  474. on May 12, 2009 at 9:11 pm lurker

    “if they don’t expect women to give in to _their_ basest biological urges”
    –besides your overwhelming beta desirre to be “please bang my wife” you are not describing any successful society on the planet.

    “Expecting one side of the male/female dynamic to suddenly develop higher morals is a fool’s game and wanting the state to enforce one side or the other is morally reprehensible.”
    –at what point, beta, did anyone here want the state to punish cheating whores? THIS IS ABOUT NOT PUNISHING CUCKHOLDED MEN, beta.

    “be aware that any casual squirt in the dark could come back to haunt you bad.”
    —oooh, I’m sooo afraid. Please tell me more of thsi scary thing called “pregnancy.”

    “The alternative is to accept that not every man is going to raise his biological child.”
    –with MPT, onl;y true losers like you will take that option.

    LikeLike


  475. on May 12, 2009 at 9:11 pm omw

    ay, lurker, but your average cheating wife isn’t cheating with EVERYBODY in town. She’s picked out Mr. Provider for social and status reasons, and is now picking Mr. Stud to make her sons sexier. Not consciously, of course.

    But that’s pretty choosy. “It’s natural!”

    If you buy off on all of the standard evo-psych Just-So stories, of course.

    LikeLike


  476. on May 12, 2009 at 9:12 pm lurker

    Bhetti, go to bed, you’re useless.

    LikeLike


  477. on May 12, 2009 at 9:15 pm lurker

    “She’s picked out Mr. Provider for social and status reasons, and is now picking Mr. Stud to make her sons sexier. ”
    –not really. Cheating whores destroy their own nest, as it were; in the wild, they would be cast into nature to die. finding mr. stud is just acting unnatural, since she puts her world on the line for a mere orgasm and dead children. not a biologically logical reaction. Provider man was mroe valuable than stud.

    Un. Natural.

    “But that’s pretty choosy.”
    –lol. you think a cheating wife just gets laid by one guy?

    Go see Your errant wife and let me knowhow that goes.

    Once a hoe, always a hoe.

    LikeLike


  478. on May 12, 2009 at 9:15 pm Bhetti

    My empty bed. So sad and useless. I could’ve filled it with lurking lovin’. *weeps*

    LikeLike


  479. on May 12, 2009 at 9:17 pm lurker

    dream on.

    LikeLike


  480. on May 12, 2009 at 9:20 pm David Alexander

    She’s picked out Mr. Provider for social and status reasons, and is now picking Mr. Stud to make her sons sexier. Not consciously, of course.

    One is for hugging, the other is for fucking. The problem is that is the man made for fucking doesn’t care about being used, while the man used for hugging may resent paying for the kids of the other man, and he certainly wants to think he’s the man for fucking AND hugging.

    LikeLike


  481. on May 12, 2009 at 9:21 pm omw

    I’d argue that “cheating wife” blogs are run more for the thrill of flamboyant semi-public exhibition than for the actual enjoyment of the cheating.

    If we’re talking about the standard extramarital affair, wherein wife falls madly in love with her boss, or her neighbor, then no, she’s not fucking everyone in town. Just one guy.

    (not that this isn’t plenty bad enough!!!)

    She winds up caught between her passionate love of the other man, and her fear of losing the husband and social status.

    You don’t know women if you don’t know that.

    As for what happens “in the wild,” this is like speculating about what human beings are “without culture.”

    Aside from a couple sad specimens locked in closets from infancy, no such critter has been found yet.

    LikeLike


  482. on May 12, 2009 at 9:22 pm havana

    Bhetti wrote:
    “I’m not surprised. I was limited to a mere 3 kids maximum by a Westerner in terms of suggested family size. There were some things about traditional good Catholicism…
    ”

    Can I get an Amen?????

    LikeLike


  483. on May 12, 2009 at 9:22 pm omw

    Yeah, I agree, DA; in large numbers it’s quite untenable.

    LikeLike


  484. on May 12, 2009 at 9:22 pm michael farris

    “Natural for a man … natural for a woman”

    Stupid = wanting to punish cheating women and not punish the men they cheat with.

    And get over the beta label, lurker. In primate studies where the terms come from, alphas are not pussy hounds like Roissy, they’re leaders of other males and protectors of the troupe (esp females and infants) who have first access to fertile females (but don’t necessarily get sole access [it’s hard to say whether they expect sole access or not but they don’t get it in any primate species known AFAIK]).

    And when it comes to humans, societies run for the benefit of betas have produced the highest living standards (for everyone) the world has ever seen. Societies run for the benefit of (true) human alpha males (like Idi Aman, Saddam Hussein, Kim Il-Sen) are shitholes that sane people as far away from as possible as fast as their feet can take them.

    Betas make the world go round, pseudo-alphas like Roissy are at best an irrelevant degenerate sideline and at worst a cancer on society.

    LikeLike


  485. on May 12, 2009 at 9:24 pm lurker

    “If we’re talking about the standard extramarital affair, wherein wife falls madly in love with her boss, or her neighbor, then no, she’s not fucking everyone in town. Just one guy. ”
    —and once he pumps her and dumps her, she moves on to another cock. She doesn’t fall madly in love, she falls madly in lust.

    “She winds up caught between her passionate love of the other man, and her fear of losing the husband and social status.”
    –which danielle steele novel you getting that from? lol

    “You don’t know women if you don’t know that. ”
    –I know she likes her bills paid while being on the cock merry-go-round.

    “As for what happens “in the wild,” this is like speculating about what human beings are “without culture.” ”
    –lol. like speculating about how natural it is for women to whore it up? Look at nature: animals kill offspring not theirs. Men will nto tolerate another’s seed.

    “Aside from a couple sad specimens locked in closets from infancy, no such critter has been found yet.”
    –tokyo?

    LikeLike


  486. on May 12, 2009 at 9:27 pm doug1

    Bhetti

    My empty bed. So sad and useless. I could’ve filled it with lurking lovin’. *weeps*

    Stop. Please.

    I should be doing other things but this is SO fun!

    LikeLike


  487. on May 12, 2009 at 9:28 pm Chic noir

    lurkerAnd any woman lame enough to find reggie bush attractive is pathetic.

    *gives lurker a shake*
    You have lost your damn mind.

    This serves space by itself. Do you see that face,skin and body. yea you are crazy.

    *looks for white jacket*

    LikeLike


  488. on May 12, 2009 at 9:29 pm lurker

    “Stupid = wanting to punish cheating women and not punish the men they cheat with.”

    Stupid= thinking a man cheating is the same as a woman cheating.

    “And get over the beta label, lurker. In primate studies where the terms come from, alphas are not pussy hounds like Roissy”
    —Easy beta, must’ve hit a nerve. If you hate Roissy’s alpha lessos, why are you here bitch boy?

    “societies run for the benefit of betas have produced the highest living standards (for everyone) the world has ever seen.”
    –except when women act unnaturally and start taking advantage of the system. Then it goes to hell. Like now.

    “Betas make the world go round”
    –until betas like you bow down to feminists and let them take power.

    Face it, beta boy, you’re screwed. 😉

    LikeLike


  489. on May 12, 2009 at 9:29 pm Chuck

    http://www.cannold.com/academic-work/2005-01-01/sperm-wars-book-2005.pdf

    Has some juicy assertions in it such as assigning fatherhood to a man based upon his signing the birth certificate or adoption papers, making him legally responsible for children even if they aren’t his own.

    She’s off her rocker on some points, but provides some interesting facts.

    First, she cites 3 cases in which men have received refunds for paternity fraud. Courts in the U.S., Australia, and U.K. have all sided with men in various instances, so at least this isn’t a full-fledged rout against the cuckolded man.

    Second, the author states that U.K. and Aussie courts are more likely to support the cuckolded father’s rights than courts in the U.S. because of the definition of “Dad” in those countries.

    Years back, the author maintains, U.K. and Australia started defining fatherhood in terms of sperm donator whereas in America fatherhood refers to financial provider.

    What simply needs to happen are paternity tests on demand at birth for “fathers” who wish to have them, with confidential results for the father of course.

    LikeLike


  490. on May 12, 2009 at 9:29 pm Chic noir

    Schoolboy Thats, that. Now about those MPT at CVS?
    Oh gosh I would hate to think that you would need one of those. You come across as so sweet and innocent. But yea they are available at CVS, I think maybe not in all states. Basically, you swab you mouth and kid’s mouth and send it in to some lab. I think the total cost is 200-300 bucks. It’s been a while and “people” were working to have it removed from the shelves.

    Lurker women want to argue like men? Then grow some balls and get over it.
    Arguing like men doesn’t always entail name calling. There are a number of men here(mu, doug, Whiskey) who bring heat with little to no name calling. Speaking of which, were the heck is PA. I expect him to be on this topic like a hot potato.
    save your hand-holding and “no put downs” for kindergarten and the sewing circle; men insult, deal with it.
    I see very few men talking to each other like this. Actually, it’s something we women do to each other. Men for whatever reason throw a few insults then somebody is going to get punched or threatened. This seems to cross cultural boundaries.

    lurker
    lol chic. quoting crap like the Matrix? Maybe next you can use an oh so intelligent Beyonce song in your argument

    yes I’m a geek. Hold on the Beyonce song is coming. I’m going to quote “single ladies” and how if everyone woman follow the lyrics no woman would reach 30 without a ring on her finger.

    DA Whiskey is mine, all mine.
    Whiskey is much too Scots-Irish to be associated with a Negro woman.

    What do you have against Whiskey’s Scots-Irish background huh??? Been hanging around HS house to much DA. Anyway, tell that to Rosa Park’s grandad.

    Lurker men here don’t want monogomaous gfs, they just want to bang. Men who want to get married want monogomous wives, which are rarer than they protray themselves Well I hope you aren’t one of the prior because that conflicts greatly with your religion.

    LikeLike


  491. on May 12, 2009 at 9:30 pm Tupac Chopra

    Chic:

    Sometimes I wonder what men would do if women went on a poon strike. Watch the alpha of alpha become beta for just a taste.

    Fat chance.

    Men (the real ones) will go on kicking ass, taking names, building stuff, and making shit happen.

    It’s the women who will shrivel into utter irrelevancy.

    DA:

    Whiskey is much too Scots-Irish to be associated with a Negro woman.

    Oh snap!

    LikeLike


  492. on May 12, 2009 at 9:30 pm omw

    Obviously, the strategy of cuckholdry carries risks, lurker, if we’re just talking about Darwinian fitness. (It also carries rewards, or women would be as reliably monogamous as we are bipedal.)

    Hell, all reproduction carries risks.

    But to argue that it’s “not natural” is plain stupid.

    It’s immoral, it’s antithetical to the creation of the sort of advanced society most of us would like to live in, but that doesn’t make it “unnatural.”

    LikeLike


  493. on May 12, 2009 at 9:30 pm lurker

    “You have lost your damn mind. ”
    –you like talentless brainless 2nd stringers? lol.

    “*looks for white jacket*”
    –from the same bitch who thinks Beyonce is the purest of pure virgins? lol. I think that’s for yourself

    LikeLike


  494. on May 12, 2009 at 9:31 pm Chic noir

    Roissy can also tell you that none of the married women i banged insisted i wear a condom, not even on the first night.
    *DEAD FAINT*
    Sweet mother of Jesus

    I don’t know maybe I’m to idealistic about the word and the genders. The danger, she is risking her life and that of her children.

    *throws boxing gloves on the mat*

    Kim and lurker you can have the rest of my gateraid ,Vaseline, and wraps.

    LikeLike


  495. on May 12, 2009 at 9:31 pm michael farris

    “animals kill offspring not theirs. Men will nto tolerate another’s seed”

    Actually the pattern (in some species, not all by any means) is that a new dominant male kills all the very young in the group at the time he becomes dominant (motives are uncertain – it’s probably less related to supporting other males’ offspring than trying to make females become fertile again as soon as possible).

    Are you suggesting that an infant/child discovered to not be the genetic offspring of the woman’s husband be killed? While, yes, that would be a fine example of ‘natural’ law I think you’ll have trouble getting that past any legislature.

    LikeLike


  496. on May 12, 2009 at 9:32 pm Dave from Hawaii

    Stupid = wanting to punish cheating women and not punish the men they cheat with.

    Farris, you mistake a lot of male rage here for this misconception that men want to punish cheating woman and give a pass to cheating men.

    The fact of the matter is that under our current legal system, not only are women NOT punished for cheating…in many cases, they are outright rewarded for there behavior.

    And the guy that ends up paying for it, is the victim…the cheated on husband.

    The only thing MPT really represents is ending the ability of women to fool another man into paying for their offspring derived from infidelity.

    It’s not about “punishing” the cheating woman so much as it’s about preventing her from victimizing the cuckolded man.

    LikeLike


  497. on May 12, 2009 at 9:32 pm Tupac Chopra

    lurker:

    Natural for a man=spread his seed.

    natural for a woman: choose her mate carefully, not have just any man’s kids.

    Nope. Natural for women is hypergamy, not monogamy.

    LikeLike


  498. on May 12, 2009 at 9:34 pm omw

    Aw, c’mon, Dave, Doug was talking about KILLIN a bitch about 500 comments ago.

    And hey, killin is natural.

    If it feels good, do it!

    LikeLike


  499. on May 12, 2009 at 9:34 pm lurker

    “Obviously, the strategy of cuckholdry carries risks, lurker, if we’re just talking about Darwinian fitness. It also carries rewards, or women would be as reliably monogamous as we are bipedal.”
    —no, the sexy sons hypothesis is self-defeating, precisely because the “sexiness” of the son is purely irrational, i.e. not based on success. Risking it all for a provider who won’t help you is unnatural. thinking the risk is worht the reward is plain stupid.

    women don’t go for flashy studs except when society allowes them to cheat with impugnity. As in every failing society. as in unnatural circumstances.

    LikeLike


  500. on May 12, 2009 at 9:36 pm Tupac Chopra

    lurker:

    and once he pumps her and dumps her, she moves on to another cock. She doesn’t fall madly in love, she falls madly in lust.

    There’s a difference?

    The love I think you’re talking about it the calculated business we call “marriage.”

    “Aside from a couple sad specimens locked in closets from infancy, no such critter has been found yet.”
    –tokyo?

    LOL

    LikeLike


  501. on May 12, 2009 at 9:38 pm Chuck

    “Stupid = wanting to punish cheating women and not punish the men they cheat with.”

    some court rulings have ordered the actual father of the baby to refund support to the cuckolded man.

    http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3254

    while the biological father should have financial responsibility *after* paternity is determined, it is the female’s “fault” for assigning (falsely) paternity to the cuckolded man.

    how about some punishment for her trying to lead her merry life, having sex with a more “alpha” man, maintaining her beta provided relationship, and having that child raised with no questions asked?

    LikeLike


  502. on May 12, 2009 at 9:39 pm lurker

    “Actually the pattern (in some species, not all by any means) is that a new dominant male kills all the very young in the group at the time he becomes dominant (motives are uncertain – it’s probably less related to supporting other males’ offspring than trying to make females become fertile again as soon as possible)”
    –lol. yes, because a dominant male really wants to take care of offspirng not his own. Or he wants his genes only to survive.

    “Are you suggesting that an infant/child discovered to not be the genetic offspring of the woman’s husband be killed? ”
    –a modest proposal (scroll up). More so, make the true father pay, and fuck up his parasitic nature.

    “While, yes, that would be a fine example of ‘natural’ law I think you’ll have trouble getting that past any legislature.”
    —so you agree that wanting to take care of your own kids and your wife having kids by another when you are in control is natural.

    Thanks, beta.

    LikeLike


  503. on May 12, 2009 at 9:40 pm omw

    If you accept the idea that there are indeed “alpha males” in the world, (guys who get laid more often, and with better mates) and if that alphaness is even somewhat heritable, then how is it “unnatural” for a woman’s genes to want some of that for her sons?

    I mean, I’d agree that it’s not the only force behind mate selection, but it isn’t nonnegligible, right?

    LikeLike


  504. on May 12, 2009 at 9:40 pm michael farris

    Dave, you’re still only talking about the responsibility/sins of women and not those of the men they cheat with.

    I’m in favor of a) punishing women for infidelity along with the men they cheat with (whether or not the men ‘knew’ she was married before gifting her with his ejaculation) b) punishing neither (and men being more relaxed about paternity in general). Either is possible (and I realize how the current system penalizes cuckolded men who don’t want anything to do with children they’re not biologically related to).

    But wanting a system that punishes women who stray (with no thought given to the men they stray with, they couldn’t help themselves poor things) is …… not wise. (I’m trying to be diplomatic here).

    LikeLike


  505. on May 12, 2009 at 9:43 pm schoolboy

    “Oh gosh I would hate to think that you would need one of those. You come across as so sweet and innocent.”-chic

    and all this because my screen name is schoolboy…

    LikeLike


  506. on May 12, 2009 at 9:44 pm schoolboy

    Roissy, and fellow blog followers:

    http://therawness.com/female-swagger/

    That is all.

    LikeLike


  507. on May 12, 2009 at 9:45 pm PA

    I have no problem with the law turning a blind eye to a man killing his wife’s lover and her.

    Similar to how some time ago in Baltimore a guy caught a stranger in his 5 year old daughter’s bedroom with his pants unzipped. The intruder jumped out the window and ran, and the father ran after him, caught him, and beat him to near-death. Neither the criminal nor civil court judged against the father.

    Same principle in both cases. Let’s bring back honor.

    LikeLike


  508. on May 12, 2009 at 9:45 pm lurker

    “If you accept the idea that there are indeed “alpha males” in the world, (guys who get laid more often, and with better mates)”
    —I do, but alpha is the guy with social dominance. In successful societies, social dominance is an ability to lead men to victory in war, business, or to beat men down financially or socially; when females get in charge, the rules change for alphaness, which Roissy has figure dout.

    “and if that alphaness is even somewhat heritable, then how is it “unnatural” for a woman’s genes to want some of that for her sons?”
    —-the parasite sleeping with married women on purpose or not caring isn’t alpha. Roissy, as he has stated, doesn’t want that, and he is alpha. It is parasitic in nature, not alpha.

    LikeLike


  509. on May 12, 2009 at 9:46 pm Tupac Chopra

    michael fairy:

    But wanting a system that punishes women who stray (with no thought given to the men they stray with, they couldn’t help themselves poor things) is …… not wise. (I’m trying to be diplomatic here).

    It’s not so much the infidelity as such that is at issue, but the financial and psychological rape of the husband when a pregnancy results.

    Yes, infidelity for a married man sucks balls, but for a woman to father the child of her lover and dupe her husband into paying for it is a whole nother level of depravity entirely.

    Don’t conflate the two issues, Fairy.

    LikeLike


  510. on May 12, 2009 at 9:46 pm lurker

    Michael Ferris Beta, as the female hysterical reaction here to MPT suggests, women who cheat are much worse than men who do.

    LikeLike


  511. on May 12, 2009 at 9:48 pm lurker

    Yes, Tupac, lead the charge!

    LikeLike


  512. on May 12, 2009 at 9:49 pm michael farris

    “make the true father pay, and fuck up his parasitic nature”

    I somehow don’t think Roissy will welcome this option (anymore than he would the idea that most of the women he ‘seduces’ know exactly what he’s doing and go along with it for their own reasons).

    What _does_ he think of those kids of his out there …. somewhere …. does the guy raising them love them? neglect them? abuse them?

    For that matter, does he really think that 99% of the women he scores with don’t know exactly what he’s doing? (ohh, that’s a neg, i’ll give him a shit test so he can think he’s in charge without going through the whole wingman game …)

    LikeLike


  513. on May 12, 2009 at 9:51 pm Tupac Chopra

    PA:

    I have no problem with the law turning a blind eye to a man killing his wife’s lover and her.

    So you think the husbands of the wives Roissy fucked would be justified in killing Roissy?

    The person with the loyalty to the husband is the wife, not any other man.

    I myself have banged a couple wives. I’m not proud of it, but in my defense, they were whores who used their husbands as beta-provider wallets. And they were treated by me commensurately to that fact.

    LikeLike


  514. on May 12, 2009 at 9:51 pm omw

    heh. I think Roissy is more “don’t ask, don’t tell” when it comes to pouring out his manhood for the married chicks.

    And, anyway, per Roissy and our other amoral-when-convenient PUAs, no chick can possibly turn away from their charms, regardless of cultural background or marital status; that’s all just “pretty lies” betas tell themselves as they drift off to sleep at night.

    Sure, alphas can be parasitic. My jaundiced view inclines me to suspect that more of them are than aren’t.

    LikeLike


  515. on May 12, 2009 at 9:53 pm Dave from Hawaii

    Since a few of you have side tracked towards a discussion of “natural,” here’s a great, online book that discusses the “natural” state of familial organization…aka “Matriarchy” and the artificial construct of “Patriarchy.”

    The Case for Father Custody

    Some of you really need to read this book.

    LikeLike


  516. on May 12, 2009 at 9:54 pm lurker

    Michael Fairy, being wrong:

    “I somehow don’t think Roissy will welcome this option”
    –who do you think is in favor of MPT? Who pbrought it up, Beta boy? Roissy himself.

    “For that matter, does he really think that 99% of the women he scores with don’t know exactly what he’s doing?”
    –he doesn’t care. Game is about what works, not what the owman is thinking while its working, dumbass.

    LikeLike


  517. on May 12, 2009 at 9:54 pm Chuck

    so if we have a cheating woman and a cheating man, both of whom have taken necessary precautions to prevent pregnancy (for the sake of argument assume this is true) is the cheating woman still worse than the cheating man? or are they now equal?

    LikeLike


  518. on May 12, 2009 at 9:57 pm doug1

    omw–

    Aw, c’mon, Dave, Doug was talking about KILLIN a bitch about 500 comments ago.

    And hey, killin is natural.

    If it feels good, do it!

    No, but if it feels really but level good, don’t ignore it.

    I said I’d feel morally justified in killing her, and challenged those who demurred to challenge me. No one did.

    I also said it wouldn’t be the smartest course given our current laws and culture. I said that credibly theatening her that you’d do that if she sought child support for her bastard, not yours, spawn, was maybe a smart move.

    Where I’m coming form is I simply wouldn’t pay it. Period. Really.

    So the question is, should I kill her, threaten to repeatedly, with escalting violence, or threaten to and then actually disfigure her face, or what?

    Yeah I might move all my money overseas. Actually in my case that might work, but I’m not even slightly worried.

    But comply? Forget about it. Never.

    I’d go nuclear, one way or another.

    All men who are men should.

    LikeLike


  519. on May 12, 2009 at 9:57 pm schoolboy

    “Game is about what works, not what the owman is thinking while its working, dumbass.”

    lol.. lurker…you are the truth sir.

    LikeLike


  520. on May 12, 2009 at 9:58 pm Chic noir

    Beta males take to much of a beating here sometimes.

    As much as men like Roosh and Roissy brag about like life styles they only able to exist because of betas who are willing to do the grunt work to keep society stable. Just imagine if all young American men between the age of 25-30 suddenly tuned out Roosh style.

    LikeLike


  521. on May 12, 2009 at 9:58 pm Tupac Chopra

    Chuck:

    so if we have a cheating woman and a cheating man, both of whom have taken necessary precautions to prevent pregnancy (for the sake of argument assume this is true) is the cheating woman still worse than the cheating man?

    What do you think champ? Who made vows?

    LikeLike


  522. on May 12, 2009 at 9:59 pm michael farris

    “he doesn’t care”

    ITA. He doesn’t care about any of his partners (long or short term) or any of the children he may have unwittingly fathered (or marriages or relationships he may have derailed). He doesn’t care that he may be being used as much as he’s using. He’s a living dildo who thinks he’s a real live boy.

    LikeLike


  523. on May 12, 2009 at 10:00 pm Chic noir

    Ah so you’ve made a apperance PA. I was wondering what happened to you.

    LikeLike


  524. on May 12, 2009 at 10:00 pm Chic noir

    Ah so you’ve made an apperance PA. I was wondering what happened to you.

    LikeLike


  525. on May 12, 2009 at 10:00 pm gig

    completely off topic, but two truths

    – life without soccer is for suckers
    – soccer is the ultimate alpha sport.

    PS: those who have a little bit of knowledge about what ” Libertadores Cup” means will see the irony i the second truth

    LikeLike


  526. on May 12, 2009 at 10:00 pm omw

    That’s cool and all, Doug, but Dave is trying to pretend the discussion is all about merely extricating an otherwise helpless victim, not about revenge or punishment at all.

    Clearly, there’s some fantasizing about revenge going on here.

    And I’m not singling you out for attack, darlin. I just remember everything you say. LOL.

    LikeLike


  527. on May 12, 2009 at 10:03 pm I_Affe

    I haven’t read all of the comments so this may have been addressed already, but aside from PA’s suggestion, what should be done with the men with whom the women cheat?

    I’m not fan of cheating women, but the cynical side of me thinks that a fair portion of the posters here would be rather lenient on the man; mainly because they’ve been that man or would someday like to be.

    LikeLike


  528. on May 12, 2009 at 10:03 pm gig

    before I start my tuesday drinking in honor of what just happened in the most important event on Earth today (hat tip: google Libertadores Cup), one last comment: I am with those who support plain murder for cheating wifes.

    LikeLike


  529. on May 12, 2009 at 10:04 pm michael farris

    “or would someday like to be”

    I think “would like to be” is really the operative phrase here.

    LikeLike


  530. on May 12, 2009 at 10:05 pm Dave from Hawaii

    I’m not trying to pretend anything. Revenge and punishment are really only the consequences of MPT revealing a cuckolding whore.

    Quit pretending that Doug’s feelings of justification for murdering a cheating wife is the primary topic of discussion.

    It’s about Mandatory Paternity Testing stripping away the current paradigm in which women hold ALL of the cards when it comes to reproductive rights.

    LikeLike


  531. on May 12, 2009 at 10:05 pm Chuck

    Tupac Chopra:

    both, champ.

    LikeLike


  532. on May 12, 2009 at 10:06 pm sara I

    lurker

    If sara’s man went muff diving in 22 year old pussy but came up for air to pay her bills, she ‘d hem and haw publically and then spread her legs nightly just thinking about what other pussy his dick’s been in.

    You don’t know me very well. If my man went muff diving on the side, I’d tell him to to go hell and that would be the end of it. Short, sweet, and to the point. Some lies aren’t so pretty. I’d rather live on the street than suck up to a man who is lying cheater. If he was “cheating” and not lying about it, that would be different. Then we’d just be incompatible. I

    Default User

    Stop taunting GNPeter (ironrailsironweights)

    Peter can beat around me bush any time he likes.

    Peter

    Do you mean the sweetly trimmed bush often seen on the types of pretty young women i no longer have access to? *sigh*.

    Okay, Peter. What is your very favorite type of bush and we know you must have one. Or give us your top 3.

    A woman talking about trust being the foundation to a marriage (typical modern pseudo-intellectual nonsense) is always talking about the man *never questioning* her actions, not the other way around.

    Yeah, sure. You’re full of shit. #_#

    LikeLike


  533. on May 12, 2009 at 10:07 pm omw

    The flip side of the Roissy figure is the homewrecking skank! 😉

    “He was married? Oh, Mami, I didn’t know! But now your daughter will finally have a little sister!”

    LikeLike


  534. on May 12, 2009 at 10:14 pm doug1

    chic noir

    Beta males take to[o] much of a beating here sometimes.

    In many ways i agree Chic.

    Most betas will marry. Actually, the great majority of them.

    (Get a prenup men. Settle a little to get one if you have to. It will help keep things better, not just help you if it all turns to shiite. Stone up about asking / requiring it. That in and of itself is a good precedent and selection tool.)

    Most betas have had girlfriends. What they can’t do is pick up girls easily, or bounce quickly after being dumped. And they rarely themselves dump. They suck at getting casual sex and if they ever do it’s a fluke. Yeah all of that matters a lot but it’s not as apocalypticly bad for betas even today as Rossy and especially Whiskey (goading towards revolution) want to make out. Though of course they’re jealous looking in.

    Here’s my thing Chic. I care about highly productive betas getting attractive women. I don’t much care that loser omega’s and lower clerk kinds of betas don’t. To bring it home, though David Alexander is articulate and in some puppy kinds of ways charming, I can’t really see how so far he’s of any value and needs to reproduce. I’m neutral about that with him. Fine if he can, don’t care if he can’t. Though actually I’m rather sure he will manage to do ok, given that he’s personality wise quite attractive to women. Far from a stud, and always will be, but not every woman wants that.

    It’s terrible for society if software engineers and mechanical ones can’t get hallway attractive women to marry them. It really is.

    LikeLike


  535. on May 12, 2009 at 10:14 pm Dave from Hawaii

    “He was married? Oh, Mami, I didn’t know!

    If she didn’t know, than how is she a homewrecking skank?

    The “home wrecking skank” deliberately and knowingly screws a married man because it makes her feel powerful in her desirability…she gets off on knowing she has seduced a man away from his wife’s bed.

    Your scenario is more like a “reverse” cuckold…except the law would still make the cheating husband pay child support for the little bastard.

    LikeLike


  536. on May 12, 2009 at 10:15 pm lurker

    “is the cheating woman still worse than the cheating man”
    —chuck, yes. basic biology.

    LikeLike


  537. on May 12, 2009 at 10:15 pm lurker

    and, dave, the husband would still pay for his poor, putupon wife

    LikeLike


  538. on May 12, 2009 at 10:18 pm Tupac Chopra

    Chuck:

    both, champ.

    My bad, I thought you were talking about a wife cheating with a single guy.

    LikeLike


  539. on May 12, 2009 at 10:19 pm omw

    Nah, the little imaginary slut only pretends she didn’t know. 😉

    Who can be bothered to ask such mundane questions in the heat of the moment?

    Sure, the law makes Daddy shell out for the little bastard; it’s not the kid’s fault his parents didn’t stop to ask each other some basic questions before they got busy making him.

    LikeLike


  540. on May 12, 2009 at 10:19 pm Chic noir

    @I_Affe_ If the guy was aware of the woman’s husband prior to, he deserves to have his ass pounded too.

    PA1. Neither the criminal nor civil court judged against the father.
    Same principle in both cases. Let’s bring back honor.

    So the pervert had the nerve to take the case to civil court?

    lurker said “is the cheating woman still worse than the cheating man”
    —chuck, yes. basic biology.

    DAve from Hawaii & Tupac, some men beg to differ. It’s about more than being cuckholed.

    LikeLike


  541. on May 12, 2009 at 10:20 pm lurker

    Michael Fairy Beta:

    “He’s a living dildo who thinks he’s a real live boy.”
    —-and you’re a walking talking vagina.

    LikeLike


  542. on May 12, 2009 at 10:20 pm Chuck

    lurker,

    but the “basic biology” rests on reproductive concerns. if those concerns are taken out of the equation, how would the cheating woman be any worse than the man?

    LikeLike


  543. on May 12, 2009 at 10:23 pm Chic noir

    @chuck- No he’s thinking the man has the part that goes in. the banana part and the female has the apple part.

    LikeLike


  544. on May 12, 2009 at 10:25 pm doug1

    Dave from Hawaii–

    Doug’s feelings of justification for murdering a cheating wife

    Please. Not what I said.

    I’d let any cheating wife go. Lots of women out there who want me. In fact in limited circumstances, with huge remorse and effort on her part I might forgive, as I’ve said above. Might. Huge remorse and proving herself to me. Have to be huge things right. Totally up to me.

    What i said with respect to 1) a cheating wife, who 2) had a bastard chlld, and 3) deceived me about it for years, who I then discovered and divorced, as i would, who then 3) sued me for child support under our current incredible feminist divorce and child support laws (that very few men really know about, courtesy of our media), her, I would have murderous thoughts towards, and feel fully morally justified in feeling that way.

    I also said it wasn’t the smartest thing to do. But that credibly threatening her along those lines, or disfiguring her face etc., might well be.

    It seems a lot of people here have taken me pretty seriously. Do you think she would too?

    LikeLike


  545. on May 12, 2009 at 10:25 pm Tupac Chopra

    Chuck:

    but the “basic biology” rests on reproductive concerns. if those concerns are taken out of the equation, how would the cheating woman be any worse than the man?

    http://www.womensinfidelity.com

    In a nutshell: when a man cheats, it’s usually just meaningless sex. He can still manage his family.

    When a woman cheats, it’s usually because she’s lost all respect for her husband and doesn’t respect him as a man. Women fall in “love” when they cheat. Much more disastrous for a family unit.

    LikeLike


  546. on May 12, 2009 at 10:25 pm lurker

    Chuck,
    evo speaking,we’re only at the point now where those concerns are out of the picutre, and they;ve only been out of the picture for 50 years at best. That’s opposed to 10,000 years of human evolution.

    Thus, the cheating woman’s mindset is still reproductively based, even if it is unnatrually twisted by our current decadence.

    If this keeps up for 1000 years with no collapse of society (highly unlikely) or radical rejection of the methods (also unlikely), we can talk.

    A cheating woman is always worse than a cheating man.

    LikeLike


  547. on May 12, 2009 at 10:29 pm lurker

    Yep, ask any man who’s been cheated on—-wait, they don’t talk about it, right? Because its emasculating: emabrassing, makes him seem like less of a man. Because his wife is calling out his betaness for all the world to see.

    A woman who cheats blames her man–and never feels bad, except in fleeting moments.

    LikeLike


  548. on May 12, 2009 at 10:31 pm Dave from Hawaii

    Doug – I get your point. I believe I’d probably seriously consider it myself in the face of a long term cuckolding deception myself…especially if the courts ordered me to pay child support after I kicked her cheating ass to the curb.

    I was merely responding to OMW trying to simplify your post — and all the men that have been participating in the discussion — as the primary topic of discussion here. It’s NOT about murdering cuckolding wives.

    LikeLike


  549. on May 12, 2009 at 10:31 pm lurker

    The more I live, the more I get those old movies and stories where people would meet in the city but move out to the country. it wasn’t just the old “start a farm”mentality; it was “get the whore out fo the decadent city before she cheats” mentality.

    LikeLike


  550. on May 12, 2009 at 10:34 pm michael farris

    lurker, can’t you think of any funnier insults?

    I mean I really don’t care what anonymous people call me (knock yourself out) but you haven’t addressed any of my points in detail or explained any of yours. Womens’ infidelity is bad because you say it is, mens’ infidelity is teh awesome because …. you said so. Those aren’t arguments.

    I’m actually pretty non-judgemental and think people should by and large pursue the lifestyle they want (and realize what they want isn’t for everyone and realize that most people want lifestyles they can’t really live up to).

    Again, sexual freedom for Roissy means non-exclusive access to girlfriends and wives for you, lurker, for you. Exclusive access to womens’ sexuality means Iranian or Saudi style control and brutality and a whore class for Roissy to play with. Which is it you want? You can’t have everything.

    If a man wants a faithful wife, then guys like Roissy are his sworn enemy, as Roissy himself says despite some passive agressive non-denials of responsibility for wrecking lives in the pursuit of whatever it is he’s pursuing.

    LikeLike


  551. on May 12, 2009 at 10:37 pm JerrDog

    Cuckoldry has a purpose. It allows stronger genes to propagate without bogging down the men with stronger genes. We can no more afford to ban cuckoldry now in the modern era than we could before if we want a fit species. Otherwise we become a race of ugly pussies.

    Personally I hope my quality seed fathers many children. I refuse to ever get snipped.

    LikeLike


  552. on May 12, 2009 at 10:38 pm omw

    Nah, but it’s also not about a clean, equitable reform of the legal system. It’s about proving Natural Male Superiority to the wickedness perversity of the female id.

    That’s fine and dandy, too; I think that’s an interesting point of view.

    It merely sort of irritates me to hear this stuff couched in terms of Equality.

    MRAs don’t want equality, though– they crave supremacy. Bitches ain’t shit.

    LikeLike


  553. on May 12, 2009 at 10:41 pm Tupac Chopra

    MRAs don’t want equality, though– they crave supremacy.

    “You want a 50/50 relationship? It means she owns you.” – David D.

    LikeLike


  554. on May 12, 2009 at 10:42 pm lurker

    “mens’ infidelity is teh awesome because ”
    —nice straw man there, nevber said it. I said the wife’s infidelity is worse (much worse) than the man’s, beta boy.

    “I’m actually pretty non-judgemental and think people should by and large pursue the lifestyle they want”
    –attention: SWPLer alert!

    “sexual freedom for Roissy means non-exclusive access to girlfriends and wives for you, lurker, for you”
    —no, it doesn’t. Roissy finds unattached women or women who make no protest about their attachment until after he bangs them–the married women he stays away from. There are plenty of unattached whores out there.

    “Which is it you want?”
    –False choice. You can have a society of hedionists and asubset of good girls. Been going on for thousands of years. We’re just running out of good girls, thanks to the “non-judgmental types” like you bitch boy.

    “If a man wants a faithful wife, then guys like Roissy are his sworn enemy, as Roissy himself says despite some passive agressive non-denials of responsibility for wrecking lives in the pursuit of whatever it is he’s pursuing.”
    —lol wrong, and a lie. Roissy does nto want to, but it is not his job to ferret out whether he’s banging a cheating wife or just your mom.

    wrong again, fairy boy. Back to the hipster commune with you.

    LikeLike


  555. on May 12, 2009 at 10:42 pm Tupac Chopra

    Bitches ain’t shit.

    Only now, at the end, do you understand. 😉

    LikeLike


  556. on May 12, 2009 at 10:46 pm Doubreaux

    Could he be considered alpha if he raised his non-kid daughter, and molested and raped her throughout her most fertile, fresh teen years?

    LikeLike


  557. on May 12, 2009 at 10:46 pm omw

    Hey, then all I have to worry my pretty head about is shoe-shopping! 😀

    LikeLike


  558. on May 12, 2009 at 10:48 pm Dave from Hawaii

    Could he be considered alpha if he raised his non-kid daughter, and molested and raped her throughout her most fertile, fresh teen years?

    Only if he starts doing so when she’s around 2 or 3 years old.

    She has to at least be potty trained first.

    LikeLike


  559. on May 12, 2009 at 10:50 pm David Alexander

    I have no problem with the law turning a blind eye to a man killing his wife’s lover and her.

    I’m sorry, but that’s why my parents moved to a white-people country. White people don’t do that anymore, and as far as I’m concerned it’s a sign of civility…

    LikeLike


  560. on May 12, 2009 at 10:50 pm Chic noir

    @DA- I think your jealous of my love for whiskey. This isn’t the first time you’ve thrown out slurs about my love for him.

    At one point, I was looking to you to be my husband you and the father of my children but you’re not being able to protect me turned me off. Imagine the high iq blk kids we may have had. Little Condi,Obama,May Anderson, and Ben Carsons to make our people proud.

    *sigh*

    LikeLike


  561. on May 12, 2009 at 10:53 pm michael farris

    “I said the wife’s infidelity is worse (much worse) than the man’s, beta boy”

    You just can’t explain why in a way that would allow any of us to keep a straight face.

    “Roissy does nto want to” (sic)

    Poor thing he just can’t help it, the words “Are you married?” represents too much effort (and might spoil all the effort he’s expended to get into Mrs Beta’s pants). He’s a victim! A victim I tell you! These slutty women just use him and forget all about him.

    “it is not his job to ferret out whether he’s banging a cheating wife or just your mom”

    I cannot believe you’re lame and/or desperate enough to pull the ‘your mom’ card.

    LikeLike


  562. on May 12, 2009 at 10:55 pm Chic noir

    Michael, these men don’t cry uncle.

    LikeLike


  563. on May 12, 2009 at 10:59 pm Dave from Hawaii

    Gee Michael, do you think that maybe a married woman is all grown up and bears the responsibility for her choices?

    Why do you care about the cad, when he’s not the one that made the vows of monogamy?

    One person takes a vow to “forsake all others.” The other took no such oath.

    Now, I don’t think the guy banging a married chick is admirable..but the person breaking their vow is more culpable and reprehensible in my book.

    LikeLike


  564. on May 12, 2009 at 11:00 pm Tupac Chopra

    Hey, then all I have to worry my pretty head about is shoe-shopping!

    As you wish.

    As long as you service your husband and don’t mouth off to him, it’s all good.

    You can even read books in your free time if it suits you.

    LikeLike


  565. on May 12, 2009 at 11:05 pm Tupac Chopra

    I’ve seen so many faces, and always left my mark
    I’ve kissed so many faces, lips smooth, just like a shark
    I have no friends, I hope that’s understood
    I take what I can take, when the taking’s good
    It’s not for love but I’ll gladly take your money
    I can pretend to be so sad or funny
    You’ll just love the way I move when I dance
    My young hips, they know how to entrance
    Nevermind him, he’s not here now
    It’s really not my problem anyhow

    An angel of love is what I may appear
    Your lonely ache, I can make, dissappear
    Yes, take me deep inside so I can heal your pain
    No angel of love takes another man’s gain

    You want to keep me held inside your cage
    You best remember, you’re twice my age
    You think I’ll wan’t you for evermore
    It’s only been two weeks, and you’re such a bore
    I can see you’re new to this, you don’t know the rules
    You’re just another one in a long line of fools

    Can you be happy for one moment in your life
    It doesn’t bother you you’re someone else’s wife?

    An angel of love is what I may appear
    What I really am is really not so clear
    I don’t live for love, you sticky bitch
    All I care about is if you’re rich
    You decide if you still want to play this game
    The price to you for this is nothing will ever be the same

    — Alex Lifeson

    LikeLike


  566. on May 12, 2009 at 11:06 pm David Alexander

    Hey, then all I have to worry my pretty head about is shoe-shopping!

    I’d say “Useless, stupid, lazy bitch who is incapable of taking care of herself”, but with more civility and gentleness.

    LikeLike


  567. on May 12, 2009 at 11:06 pm michael farris

    “In a nutshell: when a man cheats, it’s usually just meaningless sex. He can still manage his family.
    When a woman cheats, it’s usually because she’s lost all respect for her husband and doesn’t respect him as a man. Women fall in “love” when they cheat. Much more disastrous for a family unit.”

    Now you make a better case than lurker does in all his flailing about and (charmingly childlike) name-calling.

    If I understand your position: Male infidelity is not necessarily a critique of the wife’s performance as a wife (given male madonna/whore hangups and generally low standards regarding sexual partners and ability to separate sex and emotional investment) while female infidelity is ofen very much a critique of the husband as a husband (given womens’ generally pickier sexual standards and desires for sexual and emotional needs to be met simultaneously).

    There’s a lot you leave out (a man may not intend to be insulting his wife through infidelity while she’ll absolutely feel the insult and some women can separate sex and emotions pretty easily) but yours is a position I can at least respect if not totally agree with. Well done.

    LikeLike


  568. on May 12, 2009 at 11:08 pm Chuck

    JerrDogg has a good point. Its the whole Cads v Dads thing again. Women want the excitement of having sex with someone that sexually excites them but wants to have a man that will provide for her and her offspring. It’s biologically imprinted.

    But its funny which direction everyone is approaching the issue from. The worst epithet hurled on this board is “Beta”, and the beta is pitied and despised yet everyone gets up in arms about the beta being wronged.

    many here defend the beta and really it seems as if you all wish we had a system of sexual egalitarianism, but at the same time, the spoils of the alpha are heralded by most here.

    if you have a system (HBD) which realizes the ugly truth of things, and you accept the alpha and even aspire to fill that role, you can’t also have sympathy for the beta. the beta is beta by definition of the alpha. without alpha, there is no beta. the terms are relative.

    plus, as jerrdogg points out, what if we had some sort of device (MPT) to weed out cuckolded children. what if the number of cuckolded children decreases? we’d have to assume that those children receive “weaker” genes compared to the Cad alternative. perhaps we’re screwing with the natural order of things.

    from a purely Darwinistic view, perhaps the cuckolded man *should* be forced to pay for the other man’s child. this would reallocate resources to a more socially and reproductive optimal end, the Cad’s.

    LikeLike


  569. on May 12, 2009 at 11:12 pm Tupac Chopra

    Male infidelity is not necessarily a critique of the wife’s performance as a wife

    P r e c i s e l y

    yours is a position I can at least respect if not totally agree with. Well done.

    I aim to please.

    Did you check out the link to http://www.womensinfidelity.com ?

    It’s written by a woman.

    LikeLike


  570. on May 12, 2009 at 11:14 pm Tupac Chopra

    from a purely Darwinistic view, perhaps the cuckolded man *should* be forced to pay for the other man’s child. this would reallocate resources to a more socially and reproductive optimal end, the Cad’s.

    This is expat’s position, but as Whiskey points out, it is the high IQ betas that push civilizational progress forward.

    LikeLike


  571. on May 12, 2009 at 11:15 pm michael farris

    “these men don’t cry uncle”

    I don’t expect them to. Mostly they’re reacting pretty much as I would expect.

    “do you think that maybe a married woman is all grown up and bears the responsibility for her choices? Why do you care about the cad”

    I guess I haven’t been clear. My position:

    Punish both the cheating spouse (and the person they’re cheating with) or punish neither. Don’t go whining to the law to punish one more harshly than the other. If men have the short end of the stick now the answer is not to make women get the short end of the stick but to punish (or not) adultery equally, married cheater and unmarried cheater.

    And …. be careful what you wish for. Insisting on female monogamy has traditionally led to high levels of male sexual frustration (no matter how much game he has).

    LikeLike


  572. on May 12, 2009 at 11:17 pm David Alexander

    Re: Cuckold children

    Maybe we should offer a tax credit for raising the children of cuckoldry. In other words, pay betas to be betas with something more useful and better than once a month sex.

    LikeLike


  573. on May 12, 2009 at 11:20 pm Tupac Chopra

    For OMW:

    LikeLike


  574. on May 12, 2009 at 11:22 pm lurker

    Michael Fairy, being the beta:

    “You just can’t explain why”
    –except I pointed out biological reporductive needs. But hey, sticking your head in the sand is more fun for you…

    “Poor thing he just can’t help it, the words “Are you married?””
    –typical beta response: she’s out, drinking flirting, going home wiht him—but he should assume she’s married, the cad! Evil man.

    “He’s a victim! A victim I tell you! These slutty women just use him and forget all about him.”
    —at what point did Roissy or I claim he was a victim? He used her, she just concealed information he was under no obligation ask. She’s at fault, not him, beta boy.

    “I cannot believe you’re lame and/or desperate enough to pull the ‘your mom’ card.”
    –lol said the bitch blaiming the single guy hitting on an apparently single woman for not ruthlessly investigating whether she was secretly married.

    betas. can’t live with ’em. can’t shoot ’em.

    LikeLike


  575. on May 12, 2009 at 11:25 pm lurker

    “Punish both the cheating spouse (and the person they’re cheating with) or punish neither. Don’t go whining to the law to punish one more harshly than the other.”

    —those 2 sentences are in confict, moron.

    but, as we explained, the cheating whore is worse than the cheating man. If she is cheated on, she still gets all the benefits of the marriage or divorce. If he is, he does not.

    “If men have the short end of the stick now the answer is not to make women get the short end of the stick”
    —lol. or take away their long end.

    “but to punish (or not) adultery equally, married cheater and unmarried cheater.”
    –ah, the beta. still believing men and women are equal. How is that dildo up your ass, boy?

    “And …. be careful what you wish for.”
    –oh noes! a warning from a fairy!

    “Insisting on female monogamy has traditionally led to high levels of male sexual frustration (no matter how much game he has).”
    —really? do tell. because it is precisely the opposite: monogamy has lead to marriage —marriages where the wife had to give up sex by law and religion, so no frustration. It is polygamy that leads to frustration.

    You lose, beta boy.

    LikeLike


  576. on May 12, 2009 at 11:26 pm omw

    ha, Tupac, I was listening to that today in the car. Which, of course, got me thinking about Roissy.

    Ben Folds– ironically tired of being ironic before it was even cool.

    LikeLike


  577. on May 12, 2009 at 11:27 pm Chuck

    Tupac:

    true. society does need betas, but everyone is up in arms when what happens to them is the shit that *always* happens to betas.

    they get cheated on, used, abused, cuckolded and maligned in the name of women and alpha men.

    to account for this, high IQ beta men have retreated to their own endeavors to seek out a proxy for sex with hot chicks: academia, video games, science, blogs, etc. there they gain the favor of like-minded betas, and competition on those grounds is akin to getting women.

    LikeLike


  578. on May 12, 2009 at 11:27 pm David Alexander

    marriages where the wife had to give up sex by law and religion, so no frustration

    Having sex with a woman who isn’t sexually attracted to me is a form of sexual frustration, especially if I have to “pay” for it.

    LikeLike


  579. on May 12, 2009 at 11:29 pm lurker

    Roissy has staed Chuck, that his work is about dealing with the evolution of how the world has become; he praises virgin women, he just doesn’t beleive women live up to their virginal uses, therefore, he treats them as the sluts they really are.

    We decry unfairness heaped on men by women by the law.

    We also know that if betas realize how often they have been cucklolded, they will turn alpha and put women in their place.

    LikeLike


  580. on May 12, 2009 at 11:31 pm Tupac Chopra

    ha, Tupac, I was listening to that today in the car. Which, of course, got me thinking about Roissy.

    Ben Folds– ironically tired of being ironic before it was even cool.

    When a limpwristed herb like Ben Folds does a cover of Bitches Aint Shit, you know there is a sea change afoot.

    LikeLike


  581. on May 12, 2009 at 11:35 pm omw

    yeah, but he’s doing it purely to mock his own herb persona. Same vein as “Rocking the Suburbs,” only much more amusing.

    Not much of a sea change to be found in whiteboy self-deprecation.

    LikeLike


  582. on May 12, 2009 at 11:42 pm Tupac Chopra

    yeah, but he’s doing it purely to mock his own herb persona.

    Joke: What do you call herbs mocking their own pathetic personas?

    Answer: A good start.

    LikeLike


  583. on May 12, 2009 at 11:42 pm Mike

    Those who can’t trust will be doomed to loneliness.

    Words of wisdom:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust,_but_Verify

    LikeLike


  584. on May 12, 2009 at 11:48 pm novaseeker

    Cuckolding wife = curb.

    Expensive? maybe. Self respect? Priceless.

    LikeLike


  585. on May 12, 2009 at 11:48 pm whiskey

    Cheating does not justify murder.

    And a man is supposed to control his emotions.

    That is all.

    LikeLike


  586. on May 12, 2009 at 11:50 pm Comment_Whatever

    Points to take away from this thread:

    1.Secretly test to see if ‘your’ children are yours. It’s cheap. If they are yours, then great! No harm, no foul. But you should test, because they might not be yours.

    2.The law in almost all states doesn’t care if you can prove the child isn’t yours.

    http://www.menshealth.com/cda/article.do?site=MensHealth&channel=guy.wisdom&category=family.guy&conitem=4a096f83c9821110VgnVCM10000013281eac____

    If you want to avoid child support payments, then you need to make use of your passport. Remember, the results of your SECRET DNA test is known only to you. You have time. Breath in, breath out. No need to tell anyone.

    3.Women, take note that the issue of cuckolding will turn placid guys turn into maniacs screaming for blood.

    4.Men, take note that many women can’t bring themselves to say cuckolding is wrong…. even though the men here are very mad and it is clearly a VERY BAD IDEA to support it. They just can’t help themselves. They really can’t.

    Doing my part to help thread-count reach 900.

    LikeLike


  587. on May 12, 2009 at 11:52 pm lurker

    A woman who cheats has lost her value. Hence why the Romans thought you couldn’t rape a prostitute, since she had no value worth suing over.

    After that, she a worthless asset that you must nonetheless take care of and be shamed for it. Destroying the asset is a logical response, but not legal. that’s why divorce laws must be reformed.

    MPT: It’s for the children.

    LikeLike


  588. on May 12, 2009 at 11:54 pm Tupac Chopra

    Whiskey:

    Do you like Clio like I like Clio?

    (They Call Me Bruce reference for any oldsters out there)

    LikeLike


  589. on May 12, 2009 at 11:57 pm Tood

    Biased divorce laws :

    It is not an exaggeration to say that married men in America today have it just about as bad as blacks did under Jim Crow laws, around, say, the 1950s. The court circuses that destroy a dutiful husband and father are merely the modern feminist equivalent of a lynching.

    How did things get this bad? Particularly when most women wouldn’t go too far out of their way to implement such judicial changes (even if they exploit them after they exist). This is America, isn’t it?

    I think it is a combination of :
    1) Feminist lawyers working tirelessly in collusion with male divorce lawyers. Full-time feminists are still a small percentage of the female population, but have a disproportionate impact.
    2) The general chivalry/goodwill that most men still bestow upon (now undeserving) women. Men are behind the curve in this regard, and are analogous to ‘house slaves’.
    3) Many men still believing that it is their ‘duty’ to marry and have a family. This is noble, but now that the game is rigged against them, they have yet to swallow the fact that they have to re-assess what their obligations really are. This is the era of the cad, not the dad.
    4) The unwillingness of men to go vocal and share their horrors with other men, and organize around this political cause. Political causes much more trivial than this can readily gain a following, but this cannot. How many men will even write a letter to their Senator about this? None.

    So Beta men do have themselves to blame. Particularly for point 4).

    All this in combination allows the current status quo to continue.

    This will be busted apart by 2020, however, due to 1) technology, and 2) Islam, as I have written about before. Game is also a factor, except that I am convinced that we will never get to a point where more than 2% of men are moderately good at practicing Game.

    LikeLike


  590. on May 12, 2009 at 11:57 pm Gunslingergregi

    “”””””””””””””@Bhetti
    Bhetti
    lurker: Our wedding? Has noone supplied you with muslim proposal techniques: Where is the request for my mother’s number? Wasn’t I relegated to slut, now, anyway? Don’t you hate me too much as an inferior female to have to spend eternity with me?

    All irrelevant, since I’m set ruthlessly/heartlessly on doug. “””””””””””

    I guess I revoke my offer then. He He He

    Doug won good job bud.

    You won a ruthless heartless bitch. lol

    LikeLike


  591. on May 13, 2009 at 12:00 am Comment_Dave_From_Hawaii

    Dave, do you know if the blog ‘The Reality Method’ is still present anywhere on the web?

    I read a little of what he wrote, and was curious about the rest. If you saved any articles, and I know this is a big favor to ask, then could you zip them and send them to whatever894@yahoo.com?

    I know you have no reason to take the trouble to do that, but the blog seems to be gone from the web. No problem if you can’t.

    *Doing my part to help thread-count reach 900.

    LikeLike


  592. on May 13, 2009 at 12:04 am Tood

    Doug1 wrote :

    Yeah I might move all my money overseas.

    From what I understand, that does not work if you are a salaried worker at a corporation. They can merely subpoena the account that your paycheck when to, and will ask what all the withdrawals are. Since your income came from a known source, you are screwed.

    There are other things a salaried worker can do, however. But he will always be at a disadvantage to a business owner, in terms of divorce discovery.

    The best insurance is the combo of 1) pre-nup, and 2) marrying a woman who makes the same or more than you. Then, your risk, while not zero, is much less.

    LikeLike


  593. on May 13, 2009 at 12:07 am blue

    I am female, and I agree with the “male” take on this issue. FWIW, I belong to a traditional subculture.

    —

    By the way, Dr. Laura takes the “female” side of the issue. I used to read her columns. She thought a married woman pregnant with her lover’s child should stay with her husband on the grounds that multiple future generations of her family’s well being were at stake.

    LikeLike


  594. on May 13, 2009 at 12:12 am Tood

    I’m going to pressure the harpies a bit more.

    Direct question to all the women reading this :

    Is cuckolding a man, within marriage, wrong?

    Bhetti, is it wrong?

    Kim, is it wrong?

    Anony, is it wrong?

    Chic Noir, is it wrong?

    Who else is a woman here? You better answer, all of you.

    I think Nicole is the only one who will truly be fair here. Where is Nicole when you need her?

    LikeLike


  595. on May 13, 2009 at 12:13 am lurker

    blue, that might be true, but I also know Dr. Laura would have castigated the woman to death, and probably made her perfom sexual penance. The shaming via radio is what Laura does best–she understands how women unshamed are going to stray, and that society has abandoned shame to control women, because its judgmental. Dr. Laura is adamantly against divorce, I know, so she is conflcited there.

    And I’m guessing that the woman had other children by the husband, no? That may be an impetus; some children were his, which, for Laura, is good enough to keep mommy and daddy at home.

    LikeLike


  596. on May 13, 2009 at 12:14 am blue

    I also remember an article from several years ago in a woman’s magazine by a lady who had cuckolded her husband.

    The thing I remember about it is the lady said she didn’t feel guilty about it at all because she felt she had always been a good wife to her husband.

    She also said she and her husband maintained an active sex life during her extra marital affair and had always had an active sex life though her heart wasn’t in it.

    I was only in my early teens at that time, so I didn’t really understand these issues at all. I found the sentiments expressed sooooo puzzling. I don’t now.

    LikeLike


  597. on May 13, 2009 at 12:15 am lurker

    Prediction:
    Bhetti: yes.

    Kim: oh, no, its both of their fault. They should work on strengthening their relationship and not being petty.

    anony: No.

    Chic Noir: *sassy black dialectic remark* No woman should cheat, but lord, this hate coming out of here makes my head spin!

    LikeLike


  598. on May 13, 2009 at 12:20 am blue

    Re: Dr. Laura

    I also remember a certain call to the show. A certain divorced guy had a child and had divorced because his wife had cuckolded him.

    He was calling because whenever he had his kid over, his ex-wife apparently expected him to watch the illegitimate child as well, which he did not want to do.

    The issues people have! Amazing!

    Dr. Laura took the guy’s side.

    LikeLike


  599. on May 13, 2009 at 12:27 am lurker

    Damn right she should have. Frickin’ bitch wants a babysitter, he’s there to see his kid, but she, like most women nowadays, expect the man to serve them.

    LikeLike


  600. on May 13, 2009 at 12:33 am Arpagus

    Chuck:

    comparing cuckolding to the male version of rape is a bad characterization. its obviously more akin to thievery or robbery

    Rape IS thievery or robbery. Rape is robbery of sex, which is the quintessential female resource. Paternity fraud is thievery of the equivalent male resources.

    If you have trouble seeing rape as theft, I recommend reading Baumeister, R.F. & Vohs, K.D. (2004). Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339-363. See my blog for how to find it.

    That said, one could argue, as some do, that false accusations of rape really is the most apt moral equivalent of rape of the things women do to men. But false accusations are actually much worse than rape when they succeed, it seems to me, and so is potentially paternity fraud because it could mean the man does not get to reproduce at all.

    And with what passes for “rape” today, under current feminist jurisprudence, as in what is usually understood by “date rape,” or the Norwegian invention of negligent rape without mens rea, date fraud is in fact most on a par with rape, i.e. when a woman refuses to have sex after leading a man on and letting him spend money on her.

    lurker:

    As any feminazi will tell you, “rape is about power.” So is cuckholding; it is power over a man’s livlihood.

    Feminazis will tell you that for hateful ideological reasons, but they are wrong. Rape no more about power than robbing banks is about guns or visiting a brothel is about the urge to give money to women. Rape is of course about sex. Get A NATURAL HISTORY OF RAPE by Thornhill & Palmer (MIT Press, 2000) and read chapters 5-6 for a thorough refutation of this most invidious and demeaning of feminist lies.

    LikeLike


  601. on May 13, 2009 at 12:33 am JerrDog

    High IQ men who are good looking and socially assertive get more pussy than good looking men with low IQ. But we have celebrate the Bill Clinton lifestyle to make it effective. Just the other day I asked out a hot married chick who’s hubby is studly in looks but is a loser. The gleam in her eyes and glow on her face said it all but it was especially the change in her breathing pattern that showed her excitment. The problem is that I got to her 2 late. She has 2 kids who could otherwise be crippled with loser traits.

    Ceteris peribus, the status of high-IQ careers is valued more by women than their martial vows. Paternity laws suck in that this could come back to haunt me. Hopefully I can spread enough seed to make up for the prisoners knocking up drunk chicks who should know better. It is the quality of cuckoldry that we should be worried about.

    LikeLike


  602. on May 13, 2009 at 12:48 am lurker

    Arpagus, I do agree; I’m just using the feminists own illogic against them. But it really is sill of me, ’cause they’ll just change the rules.

    LikeLike


  603. on May 13, 2009 at 12:52 am lurker

    MPT: It’s for the children.

    LikeLike


  604. on May 13, 2009 at 1:18 am Comment Ninja

    It blows me away that the columnist is equating cuckoldry with hospital error and suggesting that there is nothing different between the two.

    Newsflash: in the case of hospital error, the wife is not (necessarily) an untrustworthy deceitful whore.

    LikeLike


  605. on May 13, 2009 at 1:19 am Chuck

    “Rape IS thievery or robbery.”

    Sure, but are thievery or robbery rape? It’s easy to see paternity fraud as thievery or robbery, but its not so easy to see it as rape if we use the traditional legal definition of rape, which is unwanted sexual contact.

    to get pedantic, the man fucked the woman of his own accord. she lied to him about paternity, thereby defrauding him, but there is no *rape*.

    comparing this to “male rape” has the same literal meaning as the phrase “raping the land”. i mean, unless you’re fucking the soil, it’s merely hyperbole, much like roissy’s “male rape”.

    i get the comparison, but it is merely a literary device. it seems that many here actually believe paternity fraud is “rape” in the legal sense.

    “Rape is robbery of sex, which is the quintessential female resource. Paternity fraud is thievery of the equivalent male resources.”

    equalizing each gender’s resources does not mean one can equalize the infractions upon those resources.

    if argentina’s quintessential resource is iron and cancun, mexico’s quintessential resource is pretty beaches and tropical climates, each locales resources would be confiscated by different means, straight up thievery in the case of argentinian iron and pollution, arson, etc in the case of Cancun.

    paternity fraud is just that, fraud.

    LikeLike


  606. on May 13, 2009 at 1:40 am schoolboy

    This is your life…and its ending one minute at a time.

    LikeLike


  607. on May 13, 2009 at 1:54 am Marcus Aureliette

    lurker:
    Stupid= thinking a man cheating is the same as a woman cheating.

    For a lot of good (in the sense usually meant on this board) women, the price of their fidelity is their man’s fidelity. You’re not entitled to one without the other. You may not like that, but it’s true.

    doug:
    I’d let any cheating wife go.

    And I wouldn’t blame you one bit. I’d do the same to a cheating husband.

    tood:
    Who else is a woman here? You better answer, all of you.
    I think Nicole is the only one who will truly be fair here. Where is Nicole when you need her?

    Already answered with my support of MPT. And Nicole is the only one who’ll be fair? WTF?!

    The best insurance is the combo of 1) pre-nup, and 2) marrying a woman who makes the same or more than you. Then, your risk, while not zero, is much less.

    This is sound advice for either sex. If you’re a well-earning person, it’s only wise to protect yourself.

    LikeLike


  608. on May 13, 2009 at 2:16 am Arpagus

    Sure, but are thievery or robbery rape? It’s easy to see paternity fraud as thievery or robbery, but its not so easy to see it as rape if we use the traditional legal definition of rape, which is unwanted sexual contact.

    The traditional definition of rape is not merely unwanted sexual contact (that would be the feminist definition, which also includes activity unwanted merely in retrospect and all sorts of sexual contact which is not sex — under Norwegian law e.g. rubbing a penis against a woman’s stomach is sufficient) but intercourse against her will ACCOMPLISHED by force, in other words the woman has to resist to the best of her ability unless she or someone she commonly protects probably will get killed or seriously injured (in contrast, any threat is sufficient under current law around here, even perfectly legitimate threats such as breaking up with the woman if she won’t have sex!).

    I see your point that calling paternity fraud rape is mostly a literary device, an analogy, but please don’t call any merely unwanted sexual contact rape like the feminists do. I you believe all unwanted sexual contact is rape, then you are a feminist.

    And considering how trivial most of what the feminists call rape is, rape is probably too mild a word for paternity fraud and so should be avoided — I concur.

    if argentina’s quintessential resource is iron and cancun, mexico’s quintessential resource is pretty beaches and tropical climates, each locales resources would be confiscated by different means, straight up thievery in the case of argentinian iron and pollution, arson, etc in the case of Cancun.

    You don’t really confiscate anything by pollution and arson. You merely destroy it. Rape is about taking something from the woman (with only instrumental damage) for your own benefit, as is paternity fraud about taking something from the man, and in that sense they are comparable, whereas comparing either to arson is as nonsensical as the feminist delusion that rape is motivated by power and violence.

    LikeLike


  609. on May 13, 2009 at 2:18 am Puma

    Suddenly, one starts to see the logic in foreign traditions such as “honor killings”. Funny how the MSM has been brainwashing us to see this as barbaric evil. Deeper examination reveals this was those socities’ way of punishing the cheaters, and keeping the monogamous order healthy and alive.

    LikeLike


  610. on May 13, 2009 at 2:21 am Puma

    Comment Ninja
    It blows me away that the columnist is equating cuckoldry with hospital error and suggesting that there is nothing different between the two.

    Newsflash: in the case of hospital error, the wife is not (necessarily) an untrustworthy deceitful whore.

    I guess mathematically Carolyn Hax is saying that being an untrustworthy deceitful whore is null. i.e. Not important.

    LikeLike


  611. on May 13, 2009 at 2:26 am 87

    Anony, from upthread:

    Presumption of guilt cuts deep. Imagine how you’d feel toward your state if you were presumed guilty, and had to prove your innocence.

    This is idiotic.

    One:
    A paternity test is a neutral entity. It “presumes” NEITHER innocence NOR guilt.
    It is black or white. There is no “significance level” or “preponderance of the evidence” or “reasonable doubt” standard that implies ANY presumption.

    When I was a college athlete, we were all tested for drugs. Does that “presume” that all athletes are juicing? Or is it merely quality control?

    Two:
    The indiscriminate application of the paternity tests to EVERYONE, ironically, ELIMINATES any stigma associated with the tests.

    If one particular group of women – say, upwardly mobile white women – were singled out for mandatory testing, then you’d have something there with your “stigma” thing.

    Three:
    The NEED to establish paternity dwarfs your poor wittle hurt feewings, thousandfold.

    which is worse:
    (1) subjecting cuckolded husbands to deception, uncertainty, wage slavery, and unknowing genetic extinction, or
    (2) making some over-sensitive women feel “not trusted”, but ultimately vindicating all the women who aren’t cheating whores?

    Hmm. Tough one, that.

    LikeLike


  612. on May 13, 2009 at 2:30 am 87

    Xsplat:

    That’s a load. My current GF is Muslim. And my other current one is also. Girls are girls are girls are girls are girls.

    Muslims in minority-Muslim, Western countries != Muslims in majority-Muslim countries.

    LikeLike


  613. on May 13, 2009 at 2:35 am HUNGRY HUNGRY HIPPOS YO

    “I’m writing to you because I don’t know who else to ask
    friendless

    but for a number of reasons I
    insisted on self denial

    I have not confronted
    fearful

    I am with the women in this one. Guys like this must suffer. And be wiped out from the gene pool.”

    I would agree, but keep in mind how bad a hit masculinity has taken in our society. When 40% of children grow up in single parent homes of which the majority are single-mothers, and when men are betaized from birth and alpha characteristics are strongly discouraged in favor of raising spineless gentlemen women think they want, you can hardly blame the guy. I would contest that there are very few natural betas, but that most men would be reaching or exceeding the current “alpha threshold” if they were simply socialized properly.

    LikeLike


  614. on May 13, 2009 at 2:40 am Chuck

    Arpagus:

    yes, rape involves intercourse of some kind, either vaginally, anally, or orally. the other stuff is sexual assualt or something along those lines.

    yes, rape is an overused definition applied for many things that don’t constitute rape, i agree. the same goes for the analogy of paternity fraud as “male rape”.

    LikeLike


  615. on May 13, 2009 at 2:40 am 87

    Xsplat:

    Society is based on people, and the best people have the best genes. The alphas tend to have the best genes. All animals know that, including female human animals.

    Either you’re trolling, or you’re a complete moron. At your age, and with some of your previous trenchant observations about humanity, I doubt it’s the latter, so I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you’re just stirring the pot a bit.

    The only reason we even have “society” is because the strictures of Judeo-Christian culture have allowed beta males to procreate, and beta morals to predominate. The reason society has not decayed, though, is because these beta morals have been enforced with an iron fist, until recent times.
    (Not “beta” in the derisive Roissy sense, but, rather, “beta” in the “self-sacrificing for the good of society” sense.)

    With the exception of some very religious alphas:
    * Alphas don’t create technology.
    * Alphas don’t enact, promote, and enforce laws that protect society at the expense of individual licentiousness.
    * Alphas don’t further science and higher learning.
    * Etc. Alphas don’t further “society”.

    A society ruled completely by alpha genes will regress quickly to sub-Saharan / British underclass / ghetto norms.

    Do you really think that a society of people largely endorsing your particular moral stances could stay afloat?
    Think about your own country, Indonesia. Were it not for the legacy of (a) Dutch rule (founded on beta Judeo-Christian principles), (b) Japanese rule, and (c) oil to power engines invented by betas, your country would be 237 million destitute untouchables in dirt hovels. Many would be alphas, but alphas in untouchable dirt hovels.

    Idiot.

    LikeLike


  616. on May 13, 2009 at 2:46 am Comment_Whatever

    Chuck said:

    if you have a system (HBD) which realizes the ugly truth of things, and you accept the alpha and even aspire to fill that role, you can’t also have sympathy for the beta. the beta is beta by definition of the alpha. without alpha, there is no beta. the terms are relative.

    I’m surprised, Chuck, that you’ve never been in a situation where you felt two things, each intense, each very different, about the same thing.

    1.Most here recognize that sexual hedonism is bad for society.

    2.They also believe that it is good for them, as individuals.

    3.Or, to say it better, they believe it is the best they can do.

    And that’s three things right there. Worry, perhaps, over the effect on society. Lust for the conquests they will have, and the feeling of regret over the loss implied by the third statement.

    So being of two minds on something is easy, Chuck! Three isn’t that hard either.

    *Doing my part to help thread-count reach 900.

    LikeLike


  617. on May 13, 2009 at 2:48 am Tood

    Suddenly, one starts to see the logic in foreign traditions such as “honor killings”.

    Now you see how Islam wins so many people over. including people who used to be appalled by Islam (such as I).

    What we have learned from this thread so far :

    1) The majority of women want to get away with cuckolding. They can scarcely conceal their wishes.
    2) Cuckolding is just about the worst thing that a woman can do to a man.
    3) Kick a friendly dog enough, and eventually you have a mean dog. Discovery of cuckolding can turn a placid, polite Beta male into a raging madman quite capable of slashing the woman’s throat.
    4) Large-scale cuckolding will make many men quietly approving of violence against women.

    Women are playing a dangerous game here. Traditional religions knew about this, and had rules for it (aside from Islam, burning at the stake or the equivalent was prevalent in both Christianity and Hinduism).

    LikeLike


  618. on May 13, 2009 at 2:53 am Arpagus

    yes, rape involves intercourse of some kind, either vaginally, anally, or orally. the other stuff is sexual assualt or something along those lines.

    Oral intercourse? That is the first time I’ve heard that. Even the feminists I’ve read don’t call oral sex intercourse, but they do consider it rape, and I have a real problem with that. Oral sex is of far less value to me than sex, and so I don’t accept that it can qualify as the ultimate in terms of negative sexual value for women.

    LikeLike


  619. on May 13, 2009 at 3:18 am JerrDog

    I think many commentators on this have an exaggerated paranoia that reveals morbid jealousy. Morbid jealousy is not good.

    Only about 4% of the US births is “cuckholdry” Unless you’re a clueless dipshit the chances of this happening to you are small.

    All the married women I’ve been banging were married to dweebs. Usually they are fat or their wives claim they are “impotent” although I suspect that they just aren’t attracted to them.

    Women tend to do this (seeking outside sex) in their mid 30’s – right when their eggs are going bad. I think it is either a rational or evolutionary adaptation to accelerate their stud stalking to get good seed in their aging womb.

    LikeLike


  620. on May 13, 2009 at 3:43 am Chuck

    Arpagus:

    if you stick your dick in a woman’s (or man’s) mouth (probably not a wise move), it would be rape, sure.

    when i think of the word intercourse i think of an object physically entering one’s body.

    either way, to keep this from getting too pedantic, rape is penetrating someone against their will. these are to be differentiated from sexual assault or sexual battery.

    LikeLike


  621. on May 13, 2009 at 3:44 am JerrDog

    lurker said:

    >A woman who cheats has lost her value…

    A woman who cheats has lost some of her value. That of a long-term mate. On the other hand a desirable woman who is known to have cheated is probably an easier lay.

    LikeLike


  622. on May 13, 2009 at 3:47 am JerrDog

    Aspargus said:

    “… but they do consider it (oral intercourse) rape, and I have a real problem with that. ”

    Hmmm… I’m trying to think which guy I’d rather be in that Deliverance movie, the piggy ride boy or the one with the pretty mouth…

    LikeLike


  623. on May 13, 2009 at 4:03 am 87

    Surprised that no one has commented on this little excerpt in the original post:

    Their marriage would remain strong, or at least viable, as they made arrangements with the hospital to find their true baby and swap kids with the other victimized family who mistakenly got their kid.

    Two years after a hospital error, I wouldn’t “swap kids”. I would just suddenly have an adopted daughter.
    This would be cool with me.

    Of course, I’m positively biased toward adoption, and I’m (perhaps wrongly) assuming that the wife in question is young enough to bear another, biological child(ren) without much trouble.

    I wouldn’t want to “swap” for a kid with two years of mystery parenting.
    Especially given the near-100% chance that the mystery parents would be ill-educated, liberal, indulgent morons who already would’ve compromised the child’s mental wherewithal.
    No sir.

    LikeLike


  624. on May 13, 2009 at 5:29 am HUNGRY HUNGRY HIPPOS YO

    “Suddenly, one starts to see the logic in foreign traditions such as “honor killings”.

    Now you see how Islam wins so many people over. including people who used to be appalled by Islam (such as I).

    What we have learned from this thread so far :

    1) The majority of women want to get away with cuckolding. They can scarcely conceal their wishes.
    2) Cuckolding is just about the worst thing that a woman can do to a man.
    3) Kick a friendly dog enough, and eventually you have a mean dog. Discovery of cuckolding can turn a placid, polite Beta male into a raging madman quite capable of slashing the woman’s throat.
    4) Large-scale cuckolding will make many men quietly approving of violence against women.

    Women are playing a dangerous game here. Traditional religions knew about this, and had rules for it (aside from Islam, burning at the stake or the equivalent was prevalent in both Christianity and Hinduism).”

    lol, just curious, but did you get the line in #3 from Devlin?

    Obviously we can’t go back to honor-killing, it’s not much better than the current divorce-rape in it’s barbarity. The solutions are deceptively simple. Change the way people think and shame the fuck out of these women, remove financial obligation from men to children that aren’t theirs, and make paternity testing easier and more accessible, possibly mandatory. I just solved cuckoldry.

    LikeLike


  625. on May 13, 2009 at 5:45 am Comment Ninja

    JERRDOG: “Only about 4% of the US births is “cuckholdry” Unless you’re a clueless dipshit the chances of this happening to you are small.”

    This assumes that 4% is an accurate figure. Stats are often under-reported. This is especially true for something as stigmatizing as cuckholdry. Most people are going to be reluctant to report these things, so the figures may actually be higher than 4%.

    It’ll take something like Roissy’s suggestion for mandatory paternity testing to suss out what the true figure is.

    LikeLike


  626. on May 13, 2009 at 5:49 am Obsidian

    A little while back Chic observed that “Betas take a bit of a beating here”. Meaning that perhaps we and possibly others in the seduction community whip up on the Beta Males of the world a bit too much. Perhaps she has a point.

    Nevertheless, from all that I’ve personally read from Chic herself, she would NOT choose to go out w/a Beta Male, and neither would the vast majority of the ladies who regularly post here. Most of them have clearly stated their preferences, and Beta Males aint it.

    Chic has also said, not long after she made the remark referred to above, to Dave Alex, that he would be unsatisfactory because “he couldn’t protect her”. Now I personally don’t have a problem either way w/Chic’s or any other Woman’s preferences. My point is that most of us would agree that Dave Alex is basically a good guy. But as we all know, being a “good guy” ain’t enough.

    Chic has rightly pointed out that in our time, which is really unprecendented, Women can determine who they will partner with, devoid of economic considerations. In other words, we get to see what Women *really want*. And over the past 30-40 years, I think its fair to say that the jury is in. Beta Males, for the most part, need not apply. That’s not *me* saying that, that’s what Women are saying, all day, everyday.

    The harsh truth is that Chic and other ladies will drop their drawers for the Roissys of the world a heck of a lot faster than for the Dave Alex’s. Again, I’m cool w/who a Woman chooses. But we need to be brutally honest about who they choose and why.

    If Women wanted a different tune to be sung on the mating front, they could change it overnight by simply signalling that which they preferred. They don’t, because, as Whiskey has astutely noted, they can afford the downsides-and there ARE downsides-of hooking up with the Alphas of the world. Amy and Heather can afford it outright in the form of their self supporting salaries; Shaniqua and Lourdes can afford it in the form of the Welfare State picking up the tab after the party’s over. In either case, the Betas are left out in the cold, unless they’re tapped to help pick up the pieces. That’s not the way the Betas would prefer it-thats the why the Women themselves would prefer it.

    So, I’m not inclined to beat up too much on the Beta Guys of the world-every Man can’t have leading man looks, mad charisma, or towering height-instead I put the blame where it belongs, on those whom Nature has deemed is the Decider in who gets to hook up and who does not-Women.
    O

    LikeLike


  627. on May 13, 2009 at 6:01 am Comment Ninja

    OBSIDIAN: “instead I put the blame where it belongs, on those whom Nature has deemed is the Decider in who gets to hook up and who does not-Women.”

    As a famous pua guru repeatedly says: attraction is not a choice. If this is true, then women can’t really help what it is that they are attracted to anymore than men can be attracted to youthful, bouncy boobs. Blame is counter-productive.

    What we should be asking ourselves is this: what sort of a society do we want to have? We should then acknowledge that men and women have innate differences and try to work towards that sort of society with full knowledge of our limitations and sex-differences. I see at least three obstacles for accomplishing this:

    1. Feminism: by holding onto the belief that men and women are ‘equal’ in every way and failing to acknowledge the obvious differences, feminism is preventing us from creating a society in which sex differences are acknowledged.

    2. Scientific illiteracy: unacceptably high numbers of people in North America don’t even believe in evolution.

    3. Politicians: the people who rise to prominent positions of power will necessarily pander to the people mentioned in 1 and 2. This means that for the forseeable future, we’re fucked.

    LikeLike


  628. on May 13, 2009 at 6:04 am Obsidian

    I’d also like to reiterate a point I made earlier wrt JerrDogg’s suggestion, going back to what I call the “numerical” argument wrt Paternity Fraud:

    The issue isn’t number of occurance, but rather the nature of the crime and its impact on the body politic. As Whiskey has noted, the relatively small number of cases-which we can’t know for certain until MPT becomes a reality-are enough to “sour” the pool of Women in general, because Men overall will begin to seriously question whether they can be trusted. Which to my mind stands as yet another reason why Women should be all for MPT, so as to restore trust and faith on the part of Men overall toward them. Fighting it only makes matters worse, especially for those Women who are indeed on the up and up.

    Look, if we go down the path of *how many* cases of this has happened, versus the *nature* of the crime itself, we’ll end up in a world of hurt-how many Bernie Madoffs do we need before we say that what he did was wrong in extremis?

    O

    LikeLike


  629. on May 13, 2009 at 6:18 am Obsidian

    Comment Ninja,
    Yes, I am familiar w/the axiom you noted and is not in dispute in this line of inquiry. However, as we’re quoting key ideas of Game Theory, you might be familiar w/an axiom from another famed PUA, which states that Women are inherently incapable of taking personal responsibility for their actions (Mystery Method)? Hence the oft-repeated line “he seduced me”. Wink and nod.

    And this is the crux of the matter-accountability, personal responsibility. What Feminism has done, intentionally or otherwise, is made it so that Women get all the joy and none of the guilt. Which works against every bit of hardwon wisdom ever known to human beings-how can one be both free and blamless? Indeed, isn’t a pre-requisite of freedom, responsibilities? Yet Women enmasse demand one and vehemently resist the other, and this is writ large in just about every major “talking point” in their agenda, from the so-called Glass Ceiling and Pay Wage Gap to Abortion. All bennies, no paying the piper.

    It’s the same deal here-Women want to choose the Alphas w/no appreciable downside, hence roping in Betas outright, or, failing that, roping the rest of us taxpayers collectively in the form of the Welfare state. MPT is about accountability, for the freely chosen actions done in private-no one is trying to restrict her choices. Only that she be held accountable for them.

    O

    LikeLike


  630. on May 13, 2009 at 6:24 am nilk

    Coming in late to the game again as usual.

    P.S. Too bad there’s not a test where a woman can test her husband’s DNA for children produced outside the marriage. Big difference I’m sure as she is not “paying” for them; or is she? Just a different type of payment. A payment called life, time, and trust wasted with lying cheater.

    Sara, Sara, Sara,

    This is not a blog about poor women who’ve been cheated on and are stuck with a kid.

    At least she knows whose child it is.

    A man who is cuckolded (what a great word, nice to see it coming back into use, btw), does not know if the child is his. There are a lot of men who suspect their children aren’t theirs, and have admitted a preference for not confirming their suspicions.

    In any case, there are too many men out there who pay for children they didn’t father.

    Not a way to inspire confidence in the fairer gender now, is it?

    LikeLike


  631. on May 13, 2009 at 6:31 am nilk

    Knowing human nature as I do – the angriness of the woman’s ouburst at that point would be a solid indicator of the test results.

    HR Lincoln, I’d be really pissed at the suggestion just on principle, and I’ve never cheated.

    Mind you, I believe that a DNA/paternity test at birth or if you have to get an amniocentesis done should be mandatory. Since DNA screening for genetic defects is done at birth in quite a few places is the rule rather than the exception (here in Oz, anyway), what’s one more test?

    LikeLike


  632. on May 13, 2009 at 6:31 am Obsidian

    Comment Ninja,
    Furthermore:
    Just to pickup on your point above-I as a Man, cannot help that I’m turned on sexually by a voluptuous Woman-but I CAN help how I choose to respond to said Woman, and the actions I take going forward. Attraction is one thing, *acting on it* is something else. A very important, key distinction we need to keep in mind here. Women may not be able to help who they’re attracted to, but they can help what they choose to do about it.

    O

    LikeLike


  633. on May 13, 2009 at 6:36 am xsplat

    OMW, sensible, as often

    I don’t even see what all the heat is about here. Women, if you’ve got nothing to hide, all a paternity test does is pay for a little domestic peace of mind.

    Guys, if you’re either practically or ideologically concerned about it, you can get it done pretty cheap on your own.

    As for the State, it cares about none of you. It exists to serve its own ends.

    My comment is on your last sentence, about the state. We have a similar attitude.

    I know many people want the state to reflect their interests, and that is the essense of participatory politics. I don’t happen to believe in it. I’m deeply cynical about political and economic systems, and advocate opting out as completely as possible from other peoples systems of power.

    Game the system, game women, game your brain, game everything. Everything is an operating system, susceptible to hacks and tweaks and viruses. Playing the game by the rules, trying to change the system – I don’t see rewards versus effort as practical.

    Government is not by the people and for the people. I’d like to say it has never been and will never be, but it seems that’s getting trite. So I’ll say that I can’t see how such a government is compatible with our hard wired human nature. I believe such a government to be a genetic impossibility.

    LikeLike


  634. on May 13, 2009 at 6:36 am Cannon's Canon

    ‘Chuck’ is telling himself like a dog with a flush hand of fleas. This is the entity who reflexivly insulted my gene pool for defending the possibility that mike tyson did not rape his purported partner. His alliance lies above his dalliance.

    LikeLike


  635. on May 13, 2009 at 6:44 am Obsidian

    Nilk,
    If I may, Sara is indicative of just how alien it is to so many Women to grasp the Male side of the evolutionary ledger. Recently I was talking w/a lady and shared w/her the fact that while roughly 80% (read, almost ALL) Women who ever lived has gone on to reproduce, only *half as many* Men did. Even accounting for shortened lifespans due to disease, harsh work and wars, the fact remains that Women ultimately choose who will climb between their thighs, and when given the choice most Men simply will not make it.

    My ladyfriend simply could not accept what I was telling her, even though I backed up what I said in the form of internet links to various scholars in the field of evo-psych/bio, anthropology and so on. Its completely understandable-Women, almost all of them, *constantly* have to fend off offers, the vast majority of them unwarranted, for sex from Men, while the *vast majority* of Men get laid, at best, about a dozen times a year-about once a month. That’s if they’re lucky. If guys really told the truth that number probably drops even more.

    Getting sex is no big whup for Women, you know this. But its a BIG DEAL for most guys, because its so hard to do-and hence why Studs get so much dap from the Brotherhood, while Women with a history are derided as sluts. One reason why is because its nothing to simply lay back and spread your legs, just about any Woman can do that.

    Anyway…

    O

    LikeLike


  636. on May 13, 2009 at 6:51 am 87

    But its a BIG DEAL for most guys, because its so hard to do

    This statement should be refined to indicate that getting sex from attractive women is hard for most guys.

    LikeLike


  637. on May 13, 2009 at 6:51 am nilk

    I agree, Obsidian, and it’s eternally frustrating for me.

    I know women who are happy to discuss how they’ll turn the tap off in the bedroom if the other half doesn’t do what they want, women who’ve cheated and will rationalise it away with comments about how they just couldn’t help themselves, and the usual fluffy crap.

    However, I can’t have a discussion with them about the other side of the story – as a rule, women just cannot get their heads around it. (I’m a freak – both male and female friends agree on this, as do the blokes at work lol).

    It’s too confronting, and women tend not to be capable of the necessary emotional detachment to dig into the differences between us.

    LikeLike


  638. on May 13, 2009 at 6:59 am kim

    I just feel like if a man doesn’t trust that his supposed child is his, then he should ask for a paternity test on his own. I think that there are plenty of couples who don’t need MPT in place. If you really want to know, then fucking ask. Or do it on your own when the woman is gone. It seems like the consensus here is that it’s so easy and accessible to just do it, then….do it. But there’s no reason to make it mandatory. If you’re so alpha, then why do you need the government to step in when it’s just so easy to do it on your own?

    LikeLike


  639. on May 13, 2009 at 7:06 am 87

    If you’re so alpha, then why do you need the government to step in when it’s just so easy to do it on your own?

    An ounce of prevention, etc.

    Women will respond to a firm hand, whether the hand is that of their man or their government.
    If such laws are in place, then women who are otherwise devoid of morals will (at least sometimes) be deterred from getting knocked up by the pool boy, because They Know They Won’t Get Away With It.

    The goal is not just to identify and ostracize cuckoldresses, but, even better, to PREVENT cuckoldry in the first place, via the spectre of guaranteed detection.

    Why is this so hard to understand?

    LikeLike


  640. on May 13, 2009 at 7:11 am kim

    87,

    I think if you make it clear to your SO, which it seems like a lot of people on here have done, that you’re going to expect a paternity test from early on then it’d have the same effect.

    LikeLike


  641. on May 13, 2009 at 7:18 am 87

    87,

    I think if you make it clear to your SO, which it seems like a lot of people on here have done, that you’re going to expect a paternity test from early on then it’d have the same effect.

    “A lot of people on here” are alphas, or at least alphas within the context of relationships.
    If the average American man had the stones to do that, then the legislation wouldn’t be necessary.

    LikeLike


  642. on May 13, 2009 at 7:31 am contrarian

    It’s absolutely jaw-dropping how widely approved rape is on this site (just like at the-niceguy.com’s forums where being anti-rape is considered trolling and a bannable offense). All this factually incorrect nonsense about cuckoldry being exactly like rape, or rape not being a big deal, reveals exactly what people here think about rape. For now, the anti-feminism movement will just imply and insinuate things, and casually trivialize rape, but it’s easy to see what they really have in mind. The posters here would absolutely de-criminalize rape (and any other legal protections that women have) if they somehow could. The anti-feminism movement (and related parties) is nothing but a shallow front for nihilistic misogynism, violence and anarchy. Both feminists and anti-feminists seek to destroy modern civilization, and it makes no difference which side wins.

    I was not greatly suprised to discover that no one, with the exception of me and whiskey, had any objections towards the post where johnnymarks fantasizes about throwing acid on the face of an unfaithful woman, and “[pouring] a bottle of professional strength liquid drano into her whore-hole until it rotted out her uterus.” When someone posts something on this site that others deem objectionable, they will waste no time responding, but there was no response this time. Why would there be, when everyone is in agreement?

    I like how many posters still keep insisting that it’s the women who have no morals.

    doug1

    OK, which of you would say that to your intended?

    If not, why not?

    If I feel that a paternity test is essential, it means I don’t trust my wife, and if I don’t trust her then there’s no point in being with her.

    And I condemn neither. Neither is “guilty”. I have fucked married women, and will continue to do so. I’ve been cheated on, and expect more off that. It’s neither right nor wrong.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics

    NO woman is not a cheating devilish whore. Not one.

    This new learning amazes me, sir doug1! Explain to me again how sheep’s bladders may be employed to determine that not even a single woman out of billions is absolutely faithful.

    They’re wrong.

    They cannot be wrong, because it’s entirely a matter of personal preference.

    xsplat

    I hate hate hate with a vengeance and despise good people.

    Hate them.

    Blame has nothing to do with it. Right and wrong is useless commentary.

    The only thing that matters is pragmatism. What to do.

    Men and women have different agendas. Neither is right, nor wrong. Right and wrong is a linguistic human social concept. The man has an agenda. He can take steps to promote his agenda. Blame and shame can work for him, but on the whole, there is no blame and shame.

    You belong in a mental institution (but then, the same could be said for most people here).

    LikeLike


  643. on May 13, 2009 at 7:36 am kim

    Well, what does it matter if another man is supporting/raising a child that isn’t his own because he didn’t do a paternity test? How exactly does that affect you? It doesn’t. If you want to make sure you’re not in that situation, then you should perform a paternity test. But there is no reason to make everyone do it.

    LikeLike


  644. on May 13, 2009 at 7:43 am 87

    Well, what does it matter if another man is supporting/raising a child that isn’t his own because he didn’t do a paternity test? How exactly does that affect you? It doesn’t.

    To paraphrase Niemöller, “First they came for the cuckolds, and I did not speak out because I was not a cuckold.”
    Etc.

    Those of us who value Western civilization are up against a group (feminists) that uses legislation to achieve its ends.

    You can’t fight increasingly encroaching legislation with head-in-the-sand rugged individualism.
    Fire must be fought with fire, if society is not to perish before it is reformed.

    LikeLike


  645. on May 13, 2009 at 7:46 am nilk

    It’s not the end of the world if the kid IS his or is not. Is it? Or is it? No. It’s not. It might FEEL like the end of the world, if she’s not, but eventually he will realize that his wife is only human and flawed at that, just like HE is. Only he’s flawed or delusional in other ways. It’s that ego shattering thing we talked about earlier. Relationships have a way of shattering our egos, if we let them. I’m talking about having a healthy ego; not one that’s too strong or weak.

    By that reasoning, Sara, a man should just build that bridge and get over himself. After all, he’s just as flawed as she is.

    Excuse me if I disagree with that.

    Sure, we’re all flawed, but presumably we’re grown up enough to be able to rein in our base animal urges.

    If one half of a couple either can’t or won’t control themselves, then that may – and probably will – destroy the relationship.

    I see no reason to cheat. If you want someone other than your partner, then leave them. That’s it.

    A woman who conceives a child outside the marriage is perpetrating a massive fraud that damages all parties when it is uncovered.

    But, since his wife is flawed, that’s okay.

    Like the fellow who found out both children of his marriage weren’t his. Well, he knew definitely that the older child was – he figured the younger was, but refused to go further because he still loved them after so many years raising them.

    LikeLike


  646. on May 13, 2009 at 8:11 am kim

    87,

    I get what you’re saying. I feel like the intention of MPT is selfish in most people’s cases on here though. If you are really campaigning for it because you don’t want to see your fellow male get burned, then that’s fine, but it seems like most people are in it for themselves, in which case they should take action themselves and not leave it to the government.

    LikeLike


  647. on May 13, 2009 at 8:24 am Obsidian

    There is simply no way I could continue to support, monetarily or otherwise, kids I know, for a fact, are not my own, genetically. Moreover, I could not continue in good faith supporting them, and by extension their mother, after having found out that I was lied to, perhaps for years. To do so is to add insult to injury.

    Every Man alive has every inalienable right to look out for and protect his interests-emotionally, socially, legally, genetically, financially-and we have only ourselves to blame when we refuse to protect said interests under some cockamamie “reasoning” that, because I’ve been raising them this long, they’re “my” kids no matter what. Everytime I see such a display from a weak excuse from a Man it makes me physically ill.

    Men must have the backbone to turn off their emotions like a light switch, wish the mommy good luck in finding the real baby daddy, and be Audi 5000. There is nothing wrong in the least in doing this, indeed, there is EVERYTHING RIGHT in doing it.

    Only when more Men start doing this will Women begin to think long and hard about spreading her legs, because she knows that she’ll be alone when the party’s over and the music stops.

    And Kim…

    You still have not madena cogent case for any of your counter arguments against MPT; all you have done to date is make appeals to assertion. Simply saying something is so does not make it so. I thought Feminists were more reasoned thinkers.

    Then again, perhaps not.

    Please explain, clarify and elaborate your positions?

    O

    LikeLike


  648. on May 13, 2009 at 8:30 am xsplat

    Lurker

    Yep, ask any man who’s been cheated on—-wait, they don’t talk about it, right? Because its emasculating: emabrassing, makes him seem like less of a man. Because his wife is calling out his betaness for all the world to see.

    A woman who cheats blames her man–and never feels bad, except in fleeting moments.

    Nonsense and naive nonsense. You think like a man, and I don’t mean that as a complement. You think only like a man. Just a feminist with no ability to see the male perspective is blinkered, your thinking process is male-morality-blinkered.

    I’ve been cheated on a few times. My lover once left me to go get married. She’d then call me up and complain of crying all night, and of thinking of me when fucking her husband. Another time a loveless rental-wife left me after I started cheating a bit. Another time some chick I was trying to get serious with was toying with me, for giggles and the desire for cash. Another time I was having non-monogamous serious long term relationships, and the girls considered it fair play.

    Get over yourself, Lurker. You take yourself far far too seriously. It’s just fucking around. The pain passes. No harm, no foul.

    LikeLike


  649. on May 13, 2009 at 8:36 am xsplat

    And it’s the attitude of Tood and Lurker and others who want fidelity while also wanting game that will get in their own way. You’ll trip over yourself, maintaining such a serious, romantic attitude.

    Women can smell clinginess. You care too much.

    LikeLike


  650. on May 13, 2009 at 8:37 am richmondbachelor

    I’m convinced tood is a virgin.

    Possibly also lurker.

    LikeLike


  651. on May 13, 2009 at 8:38 am Obsidian

    87,
    You’re refinement on my statement is so noted; however, as Roissy himself has noted, the massive social, technological and economic changes that have come down the pike in the past four decades have artificially inflated the sexual marketplace value on Women who would be at best 5s, 6s and 7s on said market; they in effect, act as though their 8s, 9s and even 10s because of their increased marketshare power and, at the same time, decreased power on the Male side. Result? Said Women can afford to act in such a way that it makes getting sex from them almost as hard as it is/was from the true Dimes of the world.

    And so, my general proposition holds: for most Men walking around, getting sex from that 80% of Women is no small feat, and the numbers indicate this is so-only 40%, that’s less than half, of all Men who ever lived, actually reproduced themselves. Not all sex leads to pregnancy and childbirth fair enough; but the stat is enough to go on to give us a pucture of just how tough it is for Men to get sex from *most* Women in our time now, when Women, from the homely to the comely, can *afford* to be choosy.

    Your serve…

    O

    LikeLike


  652. on May 13, 2009 at 8:40 am nilk

    “And I agree with chic here,
    A man getting cuckolded is the moral equivalent of a woman getting secretly implanted with another woman’s fertilized egg, giving birth to it, and raising it for eighteen years
    I’ve never discussed this with another woman before but something tells me that this won’t bother a woman as much as it would bother a man.

    I suspect most women would raise and nurture the implanted embryo like her own.”

    Most women probably would, Anony. There’s a reason so much emphasis is placed on the mother-child pairing. It’s one of the most powerful there is.

    No man can ever understand the feeling of another person growing inside you. Sure our bodies get fat, after a couple of years of breastfeeding we get a bit saggy and then there are the stretchmarks, but you know what?

    As powerful as men are, they can only help conceive a new life. They can’t protect it, or nurture it or help it develop to the stage where a child is born.

    This doesn’t mean their feelings towards their own children are less important – just that they’re different.

    When my girl was a preschooler, I used to take her to the indoor playground to catch up with my friends who also had little tackers.

    One thing that always amazed me was that the place could be full of screaming kids, and I could be sitting with my back to the room, but I always heard my girl cry.

    A woman should always know the child she gave birth to.

    A man rarely has that sort of confidence. Especially in this day and age of elastic morality.

    Heh. And re Roissy’s comment about children taking after their fathers? My girl has only a faint resemblence to me. So faint that I was once asked what the relationship between us was. The look on the woman’s face when I just said, “Birth” was priceless.

    The child is a dead ringer for her father. One look at him and there is no doubt at all. MPT? Who needs it?

    LikeLike


  653. on May 13, 2009 at 8:41 am xsplat

    OMW

    MRAs don’t want equality, though– they crave supremacy. Bitches ain’t shit.

    Equality is craved only by underdogs. Top dogs no longer have any need for it.

    LikeLike


  654. on May 13, 2009 at 8:50 am kim

    Obsidian,

    It doesn’t really matter what I say because you’ll never agree with it or understand my position on it. I think I’ve explained why I think MPT is unnecessary. I think men who want to have physical proof that a child is theirs should just ask or do the paternity test themselves. There is no reason to get the government involved. Grow a pair and ask, if you’re too scared to like the man in Roissy’s original post then oh well, that’s a personal problem.

    This outlook that all women are cheating whores is so bleak and depressing that it doesn’t even make sense why a lot of people on here would want to get involved with women beyond fucking around if they feel that way.

    LikeLike


  655. on May 13, 2009 at 8:54 am xsplat

    Tupac Chopra

    from a purely Darwinistic view, perhaps the cuckolded man *should* be forced to pay for the other man’s child. this would reallocate resources to a more socially and reproductive optimal end, the Cad’s.

    This is expat’s position, but as Whiskey points out, it is the high IQ betas that push civilizational progress forward.

    I disagree with Whiskey that Alphas are low IQ thugs. I think todays Alphas include a variety of upper-echelon people, and that generally sociaties top dogs are mentally superior.

    I understand that some aspergergy engineers have a bit of trouble with the chicks, but think Whiskeys case is hugely overstated. Engineers get married easily enough. Most betas are not that bright. Bright people tend to do just fine with women. Societies top dogs are not all thugs, and women don’t see only the thugs as societies top dogs. Alpha does not equate to stupid thug, it also equates to Jack Kerouac, Carlos Santana, investment bankers, entrepreneurs, and even some engineers.

    LikeLike


  656. on May 13, 2009 at 8:56 am nilk

    Why is the rape of a female considered such a horrible crime in the first place?

    Before birth control and legalized abortion, rape was particularly horrifying way of forcing a woman to have a baby from a genetic “donor” she did not want.

    A woman, forced to have a child from the DNA not of her own choosing.

    That is what the crime of rape was really all about.

    To a degree, Dave. It’s also about exerting power over another man’s property.

    Look back a few decades and centuries – women were chattel, and as such under the control of men. This is still the case in a lot of places in the world.

    A woman was given away in marriage to her husband to strengthen and enrich the tribe through offspring.

    Primogeniture ensured that the inheritance after the death of the male head of the family went to the son.

    With women having a physical commitment to the raising of children that men don’t have, this sort of arrangement would have been beneficial to women (gross generalisation here, girls, don’t get too upset).

    War is about power and winning, and to do that you have to take your opponent’s land/money/women.

    It’s just that women can and do actually think, and we don’t think as rationally, or behave as reasonably, as men do.

    of course, I’ve not read all the comments yet, but I should probably start running from the female readers about now lol

    LikeLike


  657. on May 13, 2009 at 9:03 am xsplat

    Micheal

    Punish both the cheating spouse (and the person they’re cheating with) or punish neither. Don’t go whining to the law to punish one more harshly than the other. If men have the short end of the stick now the answer is not to make women get the short end of the stick but to punish (or not) adultery equally, married cheater and unmarried cheater.

    I tend think if a woman wants a kid – fine – have it. And pay for it yourself, unless you find a man who volunteers to also pay for it.

    I know many people think being a sperm donor implies a parental responsibility, but I disagree. Abortifactants and abortions and birth control have made pregnancy 100% womens choice – it is no longer a case of “it takes two to tango”.

    ONLY if the man decided, from the beginning, that he wants to play dad, does the sperm donor become the father.

    LikeLike


  658. on May 13, 2009 at 9:17 am xsplat

    87

    Xsplat:

    That’s a load. My current GF is Muslim. And my other current one is also. Girls are girls are girls are girls are girls.

    Muslims in minority-Muslim, Western countries != Muslims in majority-Muslim countries.

    I’m not following you, 87. I’m in Indonesia now. Lived here a total of about 4 years. Girls are girls are girls are girls. Religion is merely the stories that people tell themselves to explain what they are currently doing – it does not prevent people from doing what they really want.

    LikeLike


  659. on May 13, 2009 at 9:18 am gig

    Comment Whatever

    once you own child support payments in America, unless you hold a FOREIGN passport, you will be deported. You can think that it is possible to disappear in the Third World, but once you use a credit card, it is as easy to find you as if you were in california

    LikeLike


  660. on May 13, 2009 at 9:23 am xsplat

    87

    With the exception of some very religious alphas:
    * Alphas don’t create technology.
    * Alphas don’t enact, promote, and enforce laws that protect society at the expense of individual licentiousness.
    * Alphas don’t further science and higher learning.
    * Etc. Alphas don’t further “society”.

    I’m in Indo, 87 – this is not my country. I’m Canadian.

    I disagree that civilization rests on Judeo-Christian foundations. I also disagree with each of your points above.

    Your definition of Alpha and mine are clearly different. For instance, my family background includes what I consider to be the Canadian aristocracy. Business and social leaders. They are alpha, and they contribute hugely. They married the best and brightest women.

    This idea that alphas are thugs is not what I see, and I’m surprised anyone sees that, when looking at whites.

    LikeLike


  661. on May 13, 2009 at 9:31 am contrarian

    87

    Those of us who value Western civilization are up against a group (feminists) that uses legislation to achieve its ends.

    You will not find many people on this blog who values Western civilization.

    xsplat

    Equality is craved only by underdogs. Top dogs no longer have any need for it.

    This blog’s self-styled alphas certainly have no need for it, since they want either a lawless free-for-all where they can rape, pillage and murder at will, or a repressive Taliban-like society where bitches stay in line or get an acid facial.

    This idea that alphas are thugs is not what I see, and I’m surprised anyone sees that, when looking at whites.

    Maybe you should pay more attention to this blog’s comments.

    LikeLike


  662. on May 13, 2009 at 9:33 am xsplat

    87

    If the average American man had the stones to do that, then the legislation wouldn’t be necessary.

    If some “man” doesn’t have the stones to get a paternity test, then to oblivion with his genes. I have no allegience to wooses. I don’t know why anyone would. My gender are not my allies – their just a bunch of people with dicks.

    LikeLike


  663. on May 13, 2009 at 9:36 am gig

    For a lot of good (in the sense usually meant on this board) women, the price of their fidelity is their man’s fidelity

    you should notice that women’s infidelity is protected by law in the form of child support, alimony and by having the children in a divorce. Men’s infidelity is not.

    as Tupac Chopra said, men’s infidelity doesn’t diminish his hability to be a husband or father, unless he fathers a son outside marriage, which I believe should be harshly punished and those sons highly stygmatyzed, together with their moms

    lastly, women’s infidelity is more widespread, since the fact of having a vagina is usually enough to receive male attention. Men’s infidelity is restricted to a very selected group of men.

    LikeLike


  664. on May 13, 2009 at 9:40 am gig

    the idea that all alphas are thugs that generate negative value for society, while all betas are potential Thomas Edisons is exagerated AT BEST

    Just to give two examples:

    “I am darius and I brought peace to the world”
    “I found Rome as a city of brick and mud and left her as a city of marble”

    The two pacifiers of the world above, Darius the Great and Augustus, were beta or alpha?

    LikeLike


  665. on May 13, 2009 at 9:42 am Obsidian

    Kim,
    It seems that your main opposition to MPT is the spectre of State involvement; your position is that its not necessary. Yet the State IS involved, should the case be that the kid is proven not to be his, but he’s still pressured, under the threat of debtor’s prison, to underwrite the kid and by extension the kid’s mother. So the State is already involved.

    What I and others are merely asking is that the State hold the interests of the putative/duped dad into account as well. All MPT does is ascertain that kids are properly genetically matched to the Men who are presumed to be the dads, nothing more, nothing less. If the Man in question wishes to continue caring for a kid that he discovers is not his own, that is his choice and it should be honored, just as the choice NOT to continue said support and recognition upon finding out the truth.

    In no way does this impinge upon the Wife’s right to say, abort the kid, because as I’ve already noted, she can do that right now w/o the hubbie’s permission or even awareness.

    So again, I fail to see your logic.

    W/all due respect.

    O

    LikeLike


  666. on May 13, 2009 at 9:45 am Clarence

    I see that Contrarian is upset about being roundly ignored. But if one posts on this blog, one should expect to make logical arguments or else be chastised or ignored. Stuff about how the majority of men on this blog approve of rape because they don’t respond to one or two posts out of literally hundreds is just one example of the utter stupidity and /or disingeniousness that Contrarian is blessed with. I suppose using his/her posts as examples of the how not to argue and how not to post makes them useful for this blog after all.

    LikeLike


  667. on May 13, 2009 at 9:45 am xsplat

    Gig

    once you own child support payments in America, unless you hold a FOREIGN passport, you will be deported.

    Nonsense. Not paying child support is not an extraditable crime. Also, most, but not all countries have extradition treaties with the US.

    LikeLike


  668. on May 13, 2009 at 9:46 am novaseeker

    It’s amazing yet unsurprising how much the women here support cuckolding.

    Let me restate: cuckolding is the absolutely worst thing that can happen to a man, in terms of his genetic legacy. It is a genetic ZERO for a man. If you want to call it fraud, fine — but it is the worst possible fraud that can ever be committed, because it is a genetic fraud, it is a fraud that makes a man invest in another mans child, to further the genetic destiny of another man against his will and without his knowledge and consent. It is the most vile thing a woman can do to a man, completely evil and base.

    Yet women support it. We know why, ladies. It’s because it’s a part of your wired strategy for mating with the best sperm.

    Fine. We have a solution for that now. For the first time in human history, there is a reliable test that uncovers cuckoldry. Of course women are going to feel threatened viscerally by this — it is the biggest threat to their wired mating strategy since the dawn of the species. A bigger threat even than the imposition of hard monogamy was, because women still managed to cuckold and it was undiscoverable. Not any longer. Medical science scored a big win for men when it invented the DNA paternity test.

    These tests need to be mandatory. Why? Because making them mandatory simply makes it a question of fact. No angsty conversation with the mother. No recriminations or accusations. Just another test among many that are mandatorily done at birth. And let the chips fall where they may.

    LikeLike


  669. on May 13, 2009 at 9:54 am gig

    Not paying child support is not an extraditable crime. Also, most, but not all countries have extradition treaties with the US

    It is not extraditable where it is not a crime. Unfortunately, SWPL mindset is associated with higher standards of living, so that countries without child support tend to be not the best ones on Earth

    You talk about nonsense. Think a little about the countries on Earth that don’t have extradition treaties with the US. Who is talking nonsense now?

    And how precisely you want to LIVE in a foreign country? I am not talking about jobs, but about VISAS. Only the West makes it easy to get one, but for non-westerns.

    LikeLike


  670. on May 13, 2009 at 9:57 am contrarian

    Clarence

    I see that Contrarian is upset about being roundly ignored.

    I’m upset because in terms of morality this blog’s commenters are about on par with rural Afghanistan or Pakistan. I am ignored because there is nothing they can say in their defense, since their position is indefensible.

    But if one posts on this blog, one should expect to make logical arguments or else be chastised or ignored. Stuff about how the majority of men on this blog approve of rape because they don’t respond to one or two posts out of literally hundreds is just one example of the utter stupidity and /or disingeniousness that Contrarian is blessed with. I suppose using his/her posts as examples of the how not to argue and how not to post makes them useful for this blog after all.

    The post was made very early on, and people are continuously responding to posts which means that they are not being ignored. The only reason why only two people (including me) have responded to johnnymarks’ post is because nobody else has a problem with it.

    LikeLike


  671. on May 13, 2009 at 9:58 am xsplat

    Indonesia affords an excellent lifestyle, and has no extradition treaty.

    Not all crimes are extraditeable. Usually the crime must have a mandatory sentence of a minimum of 1 year, usually more, and some countries list only specific crimes.

    Failure to pay child support therefore is not extraditable, even in European countries.

    LikeLike


  672. on May 13, 2009 at 10:01 am gig

    contrarian

    You have only three arguments in your posts: game doesn’t work, female beauty is random, Islam is evil. The number people trying to argue with you is dropping fast, and now I predict that once you post some idiotic comment, only one answer will appear: Contrarian is stupid/freak/Angry-version-of-DA

    LikeLike


  673. on May 13, 2009 at 10:04 am xsplat

    Gig – you mistakenly assume that contrarian is a person. Actually, he is not a human being. All people are not equal, and some are so unequal as to be sub-human.

    http://xsplat.wordpress.com/2007/06/30/how-human-are-we-on-blogs/

    LikeLike


  674. on May 13, 2009 at 10:09 am gig

    xsplat

    a guy does a DNA test at home and discovers he was cuckolded. Do you think it is reasonable to imagine that he can create for himself your lifestyle in Indonesia in, say, 3 months?

    The fact that YOU have a high standard of living in Indonesia makes you think that it is easy, possible, and quick for ANYONE to do the same.

    and you failed to tell me how exactly will the guy get a fast track VISA. Also, I don’t believe that you can travel in the Anglosphere while owning child support in an anglo country. So your utopian view ignores this fact, that a cuckolded husband who flees America won’t be ever able to come home again. Since YOU can get a plane anytime and fly to any city in the US you want, you conveniently forget that fleeing America’s child support means abandoning America for life

    LikeLike


  675. on May 13, 2009 at 10:10 am Wonka

    For once, I’m 100% in agreement with roissy.

    LikeLike


  676. on May 13, 2009 at 10:13 am gig

    another one, xsplat

    I don’t know how it works in the US, but all passports I know have an expiring date. usually it is below 10 years. So unless you can get yourself a foreign passport in 10 years, you become an international pariah or returns to the US.

    Roissy and you are completely unrealistic about the reality facing a men fleeing child support in his native country, without a foreign passport

    LikeLike


  677. on May 13, 2009 at 10:16 am kim

    Obsidian,

    I know..I get what the argument is in support of MPT and you’re entitled to that opinion. I still disagree with it and think it should be done at a personal level though. I will say though, that of everyone else, you are the best at logically arguing in favor of MPT, probably because every other word isn’t “feminist” “cunt” “slut” etc.

    LikeLike


  678. on May 13, 2009 at 10:18 am xsplat

    Gig – you are correct that if a persons lifestyle is not transportable, then moving becomes very difficult.

    I won’t get into visas, but anyone who wants to be an expat can, with some research and effort. There are a lot of us.

    As for renewing a passport, I’m not sure about that. You might be right. But I’m not sure if you are – I would think that only high level crimes would preclude passport renewal, and I doubt child support is considered such a crime. I think it a civil offense, no? Not huge criminal offense?

    Agreed, becoming an expat is no simple matter. Yet many do so and thrive.

    LikeLike


  679. on May 13, 2009 at 10:23 am Tupac Chopra

    cuntrarian:

    You will not find many people on this blog who values Western civilization.

    and then:

    Maybe you should pay more attention to this blog’s comments.

    Take your own advice, punk.

    LikeLike


  680. on May 13, 2009 at 10:29 am PA

    but anyone who wants to be an expat can, with some research and effort. There are a lot of us.

    Becoming an expat woudl require a huge mental shift in an adult, but it can be done. It woudl have to require emancipating oneself from expecting to live a normal American life. Sometimes a traumatic-level disillusionment with our society can do this.

    And the payoffs can be huge: there is something to be said for Fred Reed’s living in a Mexican village. Like Gunslinger once brilliantly noted, “you wanna see what freedom looks like, visit a thrid world country.”

    The passport thing: if you go to the passpost web page, you’ll see their requirements with regards to child-support status.

    LikeLike


  681. on May 13, 2009 at 10:30 am Bhetti

    Tood: Let me show you some quotes of what I’ve already said already and you can check my own blog for some commentary I’ve had on the matter before I even approached this thread:

    Cuckoldry is its own crime, while sharing things with rape, it can be worse in some ways. It has aspects of violation, gross betrayal, humiliation, emotional damage and genetic threat to it. To think everything’s ok and then to discover how you were lied to and for so long and regarding the most important part of a long-term relationship by the one person you thought you could trust or even have power over…

    The main point is that YES, it should be taken SERIOUSLY for MEN like RAPE is taken SERIOUSLY for WOMEN.

    It is one of the worst betrayals by a human being. I can’t even imagine doing that to a man. Not only cheating on him, not only not lying to him, not only bearing another man’s child but making him become emotionally and in every other way invested into that child, for years and years. The multitude of wounds that sort of thing opens in a man’s soul, heart, mind and pride. It’s enough to shatter a human being’s whole identity and inspire the worst of misanthropy.

    I don’t understand the mentality that can say anything about this is not outright repulsive.

    Anyway, I’m sad to break this to you, Tood, but muslims and adherance to Islam is sadly very loose for some things or not strictly correct for some of the things you want from the religion e.g. there’s no justification I can directly find on honour killings. You’re looking for a more cultural rather than religious mentality, which can be — fair enough — provided by some of the muslims you’re thinking of.

    Do not underestimate a human’s capability of fusing Islam and SWPL together, even if it takes doublethink.

    “Kick a friendly dog enough”: That’s a strategy women can unconsciously use with their betas, in an effort to get the dominance out. People like to stretch their limits, test their boundaries and can be upset if there are none.

    You’d think it’d be easy with their beta sensitivity but it’s so hard to kick a puppy like DA and the response of anger or outlining the limits can be buried deep in favour of the response of sadness.

    NotReallyTokyo: I’m pretty sure the rape equals cuckoldry argument was on the presupposition that rape was wrong and the majority’s sentiments were geared in that direction; it’d be a pretty silly argument if it was on the presupposition that it was not. There’s too much misogyny to deal with here and not responding does not mean not having a problem with it.

    LikeLike


  682. on May 13, 2009 at 10:32 am Tupac Chopra

    xsplat:

    I disagree with Whiskey that Alphas are low IQ thugs. I think todays Alphas include a variety of upper-echelon people, and that generally sociaties top dogs are mentally superior.

    This is true, but these men are a tiny tiny fraction of the types of men most women are cheating with.

    For the vast majority of affairs, the woman is moving laterally or even downwardly in the pursuit of higher testosterone, i.e., personal trainers, suave foreigners, pool-boys, F-300 driving contractors, etc.

    LikeLike


  683. on May 13, 2009 at 10:34 am contrarian

    gig

    You have only three arguments in your posts: game doesn’t work, female beauty is random, Islam is evil. The number people trying to argue with you is dropping fast, and now I predict that once you post some idiotic comment, only one answer will appear: Contrarian is stupid/freak/Angry-version-of-DA

    1) I have not claimed that game does not work, I have claimed that it’s unnecessary. Which it is.
    2) Female beauty is subjective, that’s simply a fact. Not my fault that there are so many people claiming otherwise.
    3) I rarely if ever start Islam debates. Apparently I’m the only person here who is not allowed to discuss the subject.
    4) You are changing the subject and being blatantly evasive, as well as clearly making shit up by claiming that the aforementioned three subjects are the only ones I ever discuss.

    xsplat

    Gig – you mistakenly assume that contrarian is a person. Actually, he is not a human being. All people are not equal, and some are so unequal as to be sub-human.

    And why am I a sub-human? Because I am opposed to rape? Because I have morals? Because I am not seeking the destruction of Western civilization?

    Tupac Chopra

    Take your own advice, punk.

    I have clearly explained how the anti-feminism movement (which is strongly represented here) seeks to destroy Western civilization, rather than defend it.

    LikeLike


  684. on May 13, 2009 at 10:37 am Tupac Chopra

    Bhetti:

    You’d think it’d be easy with their beta sensitivity but it’s so hard to kick a puppy like DA

    C’mon Bhetti, you can do it. I know you have it in you. I can feel….your anger.

    LikeLike


  685. on May 13, 2009 at 10:41 am Bhetti

    Re: revenge. I know you guys are keen on it but if I was the columnist, I might have written in the same way. Maybe for different reasons. People who commit certain crimes almost become objects to me: I consciously ignore emotional and mental involvement because they are nothing. Social justice, for the protection of society and other victims, is what I make it about. Punishment or not, it doesn’t matter, they don’t deserve the same emotions as a normal human being. Revenge’s a fun fantasy but they’re not worth one tiny bit of upset it might cause to people who actually care about you to take the dark path of pursuing revenge. You are the number one person to look after and they are now nothing. Yours and others interests should be your priority, not the insignificant psychological state of a person who barely counts as a human being.

    LikeLike


  686. on May 13, 2009 at 10:45 am xsplat

    Betti, awash in lucidity

    Punishment or not, it doesn’t matter, they don’t deserve the same emotions as a normal human being. Revenge’s a fun fantasy but they’re not worth one tiny bit of upset it might cause to people who actually care about you to take the dark path of pursuing revenge. You are the number one person to look after and they are now nothing. Yours and others interests should be your priority, not the insignificant psychological state of a person who barely counts as a human being.

    Yup – some people truly are psycho. Revenge on a psycho is like revenge on a retarded child. What’s the point? Psychos are simply not human beings. They are not within the social norms, and so the socially-normative punitive process is pointless.

    LikeLike


  687. on May 13, 2009 at 10:50 am David Alexander

    In either case, the Betas are left out in the cold, unless they’re tapped to help pick up the pieces. That’s not the way the Betas would prefer it-thats the why the Women themselves would prefer it.

    The problem is that they’re not picking us because they find us attractive and arousing, but because we’re potentially good fathers with some income and possibly good credit. Once you realize that beta males are simply unattractive to women, you don’t want to bother women because it’s insulting to the beta male, especially once he realizes than an alpha male can extract far better sex from that woman than he can.

    It’s the virtual equivalent of give a beta male a 500 horsepower supercar, but telling him he’s limited to 35 mph and 100 hp when he drives it. Once he’s told that the alphas can drive it at full power, he’ll give up on the car.

    feminism is preventing us from creating a society in which sex differences are acknowledged

    The problem is that in our Anglo-American capitalist society, feminine traits aren’t useful in building income and wealth, and thus, some women felt marginalized, hence the emphasis on male traits in women.

    LikeLike


  688. on May 13, 2009 at 10:52 am pez

    Jeez….you are totally right on this one Roissy, her advice should have been the q-tip swab…

    Doesn’t she know the adage,

    “Mommy’s baby. Daddy Maybe.”

    Right after my son’s birth my nurse said this sweet bit to my husband, who is very Mediterranian in appearance, as he questioned my son’s pale skin, light blue eyes, and obvious resemblance to me…

    I thought it was hilarious, and told him to figure it out with a smile. He’s a true Alpha and I love playing the game!!! Whats wrong with flirtation and jealousy? This guy needs a backbone, not advice on how to cut off his balls.

    LikeLike


  689. on May 13, 2009 at 10:57 am Bhetti

    Tupac: It’s pathetic. I’ve had absolute childish bitchfits about absolutely nothing with a beta and the very moment he got angry — the very moment — I’d stop and be sweet and apologise and be regretful. Yet, he still wouldn’t tell me to shut it when I’d come out with b/s as soon as I did it, but let me go on until I’d crossed so many lines. When just one hint of anger would’ve stopped me. I knew I was hurting him and I didn’t even know why I kept on, when it’s so out of character for other human interaction. I can recognise that, now, I think (maturing) and am learning to stop myself first. I’m trying to like myself, so I don’t want to keep doing the bitch routine.

    Leave playing martyr to the women, which is their natural fantasy (if we want to generalise).

    LikeLike


  690. on May 13, 2009 at 11:00 am Obsidian

    Kim,
    Thank you. I try hard to bring reason to this debate because the very nature of the topic is such that it can easily turn into a emotive tinderbox. I respect your feelings on the matter, but I think you would agree w/me that public policy should not be decided on the basis of visceral feelings but rather reasoned thought after impassioned debate.

    I also think you would agree that the state has a very strong role in the upholding of Women’s reproductive rights, yes? The state also supports the same Women in extracting child support payments and the like should the matter warrant it. Why then should the state refrain in the matter of MPT is still then not made clear to me per your protestations, and I still await an explanation from you on this point.

    Please clarify?

    O

    LikeLike


  691. on May 13, 2009 at 11:01 am Thursday

    Bright people tend to do just fine with women.

    I used to hang around a lot of lawyers and my experience with the “elite” is this:

    1. About 10% were high-T guys who were able to use their lawyerly status to score lots of women and/or a relationship with a true hottie. Of course, most of them had some natural game and probably would have done well without being in law.

    2. About 45% were guys who managed to parley their lawyerly status into marrying women somewhat more good looking than they.

    3. About 45% ended up marrying smart women who were no more attractive than they. Smart passable looking to ugly nerds marrying smart passable looking to ugly nerds.

    A large subset of bright people just plain suck ass at attracting women. T. (Ricky Raw) has noted that it isn’t his big law/big finance friends that do well with women.

    LikeLike


  692. on May 13, 2009 at 11:04 am lurker

    You know, contrarian and kim offer excellent examples of internet trolls.

    contrarian is a classic troll. He invents straw men, pays little heed when his own illogic and failings are pointed out, and just basically thinks winning=posting last. His block quotes are hilarious: they completely ignore the logic of the arguments and repeat the same strawmen he always hugs in time of need.

    His straw men are classic, as is his irrational hatred of Islam. The latter used to piss me off, now is just funny, because all basic facts in history directly contradict his assertions about it. His response? “Well, history is biased.” And when I’ve asked him to present facts that would justify his radically unaccepted Islamic assertions, he claims the onus is on me and accepted history to somehow prove his crackpot theories wrong. lol.

    It’s laughable. It’s like when a Nazi argues the Holocaust never happened.

    cuntish “kim”:
    “I know..I get what the argument is in support of MPT and you’re entitled to that opinion. I still disagree with it and think it should be done at a personal level though. I will say though, that of everyone else, you are the best at logically arguing in favor of MPT, probably because every other word isn’t “feminist” “cunt” “slut” etc.”

    —a very good approximation fo a concern troll. She makes a ridiculous analogy or connection, then claims that she just wants to make sure this is not government involvement in ending child murder, er, abortion—knowing this is her best tactic, since no one here will accept her feminism, she tries to drive a wedge using abortion.

    Kim would probably have a good career at the FBI with her tactic. COINTERPLO, or something like that.

    Dumb feminist cunt.

    LikeLike


  693. on May 13, 2009 at 11:05 am xsplat

    Pez (inspiring me to pull at the nape of her neck and see if a candy pops out of her throat)

    I thought it was hilarious, and told him to figure it out with a smile. He’s a true Alpha and I love playing the game!!!

    Ahh, you understand the games I play with my girls all day long. None of this pussyfooting about and walking on eggshells. Jealousy is just another tool for fun.

    LikeLike


  694. on May 13, 2009 at 11:08 am wexler

    Awesome article.

    You recognized the poor sap’s betaness by the second sentence? How did it take so long. Any man seeking advice from a woman on any issue involving relationships is beta compost, end of story.

    That was a point gleaned here. Someone pointed out how mothers, sisters, female friends are the ones advocating, “Be the nice guy.” Self-destructive advice. Do they want a trainwreck, or is it bad advice born of cluelessness. In the end, what’s the difference, the point is:

    Women advocate against the violent, forceful nature of the mating game. But the votes they cast with their pussies oppose this. Ultimately, they want their cake and to eat it too. And men, by accepting particular beta-roles and limits, allow this.

    LikeLike


  695. on May 13, 2009 at 11:10 am xsplat

    Betti

    …Leave playing martyr to the women, which is their natural fantasy (if we want to generalise).

    Great post. I hear you that it’s tiring to be the bitch, you don’t know why its so hard to stop, and you’d feel better about yourself if you could.

    But what I read from this is that the percentage of men who could control your behaviour is very small. Such men are the social alphas. You are bitchy, because you crave a social alpha.

    An alpha would tease and mock you, ignore you, tell you to shut up, fuck you silent, or in extreme circumstances if you were out of your head raise a hand to you. Rarely does a man attain the experience to have these skills. Of course you’d want that. All women do.

    So your being a bitch and bitch testing is natures way of making you make men man up and making it easier to find out who truly makes you wet.

    LikeLike


  696. on May 13, 2009 at 11:14 am Bhetti

    xsplat: low IQ children bring the joy children do, which is just reminding you to enjoy the small things in life. They inspire care about them and they’re genuinely innocent for the most part. I think their nature actively pushes revenge out of an emotional heart. It’s a mistake for me to think they have nothing to contribute on at least the individual level or equate them to psychos.

    But we probably have different feelings about that.

    LikeLike


  697. on May 13, 2009 at 11:15 am xsplat

    Thursday

    A large subset of bright people just plain suck ass at attracting women. T. (Ricky Raw) has noted that it isn’t his big law/big finance friends that do well with women.

    Right. And an even larger subset of not-so-bright people just plain suck ass at attracting women.

    Overall, the brighter people are who the debutantes aim for.

    LikeLike


  698. on May 13, 2009 at 11:16 am contrarian

    Bhetti

    I’m pretty sure the rape equals cuckoldry argument was on the presupposition that rape was wrong and the majority’s sentiments were geared in that direction; it’d be a pretty silly argument if it was on the presupposition that it was not. There’s too much misogyny to deal with here and not responding does not mean not having a problem with it.

    Equating rape to something that is trivial by comparison is a way of trivializing rape. And then there are the “well what’s so terrible about rape anyway” comments.

    lurker

    You know, contrarian and kim offer excellent examples of internet trolls.

    Are you confusing me with you? You have trolled me countless of times, and every time I have demonstrated this to be the case you have not been able to argue otherwise.

    contrarian is a classic troll. He invents straw men, pays little heed when his own illogic and failings are pointed out, and just basically thinks winning=posting last. His block quotes are hilarious: they completely ignore the logic of the arguments and repeat the same strawmen he always hugs in time of need.

    What are these alleged straw men that you are referring to?

    His straw men are classic, as is his irrational hatred of Islam. The latter used to piss me off, now is just funny, because all basic facts in history directly contradict his assertions about it. His response? “Well, history is biased.” And when I’ve asked him to present facts that would justify his radically unaccepted Islamic assertions, he claims the onus is on me and accepted history to somehow prove his crackpot theories wrong. lol.

    See, now you’re trolling again. You’re attempting to derail the thread with an off-topic argument (that I won ages ago, which is undoubtedly the reason for your still ongoing meltdown). In fact, the whole strategy of responding with accusations of trolling is trolling itself.

    LikeLike


  699. on May 13, 2009 at 11:18 am xsplat

    Betti

    low iq children…But we probably have different feelings about that.

    Damn straight we do. I’m not a nuturly mother type. I want my children to be a reflection of me, and to be the best and the brightest, to stand out and excell – to be natural born titans of whatever they choose.

    I am ruthless and cold about what children should be fostered. I don’t feel that children are gods little gifts. Not in the least.

    LikeLike


  700. on May 13, 2009 at 11:21 am pez

    Yes Xsplat….

    Its too boring otherwise, safety and security create the foundation for true discontent in a mate. Keep them guessing, keep the game going, otherwise the search begins to start a new game…

    LikeLike


  701. on May 13, 2009 at 11:22 am doug1

    Tupac; Michael Harris; omw; Lurker

    Tupac: In a nutshell: when a man cheats, it’s usually just meaningless sex. He can still manage his family.
    When a woman cheats, it’s usually because she’s lost all respect for her husband and doesn’t respect him as a man. Women fall in “love” when they cheat. Much more disastrous for a family unit.

    Actually I think women’s cheating is often much worse than that. It tends to turn a vague yeaning and diffuse dissatisfaction into a sharp emotional break.

    What I think to the verge of being certain, is that women almost always backdate their loss of respect for their husband as a man to before their cheating, to excuse the cheating. This is done subconsciously. In fact this usually happens AFTER she does, not before. Particularly this is the case when her husband is in fact a good and admirable man. In our current culture and environment, many women cheat on these types of men too. Even on alphas. Yes.

    As well it’s not necessarily true that women lose all respect for their husbands when they cheat or certainly that they have before they start. Instead what does tend to happen is they lose all sexual desire for him after the fall in lust with a lover. I’ve found that cheating wife blogs are highly illuminating.

    Of course if a woman HAS lost all respect for her husband, then she is highly likely to cheat outside of some religious circles in our society.
    The progression for women is that (in relationships that are quite good to begin with)

    1) She falls in love. (At least to a considerable extent. If she’s been strongly in love before, the more times the less good, not as deeply. That’s worse. A lot worse. And today typical.) During this period she doesn’t even notice other men. The idea of cheating seems absurd to her, or revolting. This might last six months or as long as two years.

    2) She remains in love but her feelings a calmer, and weaker. She’s less passionate but tranquilly and happily lovers her husband. She notices other men but she feels no particular impetus to act. Another 2 or maybe 4 years, depending on what else is going on. She’s got an infant in most cases that occupies lots of her time and energy. Might impact her sex life negatively. That is highly variable to the woman. The amount of help the husband gives at home is almost entirely (entirely) a feminist red herring.

    3) She’s no long chemically bound to her husband. However they have built a life together. He may be her best friend. She may admire him greatly, or resent him and have started looking down on him. In any event she’s more than capable of seeing him critically. No one knows more dirt about him than she does. NOW, if she’s in a society in which women’s infidelity in all social classes is a huge and often media excused or celebrated activity, and women make out with huge divorce theft when they cheat on professional earning men, then she’s going to be strongly tempted, especially if she has a high sex drive and has kept her looks up mostly for reasons of general social status.

    4) If shes cheat her female nature will strongly impel her to fall in love. Ironically this is less true of sluts, who though they will probably have cheated sooner, are less likely to super bond with their lovers. If she falls in love and she’s a one man kind of relative good girl woman, her female nature will wish to make her lover exclusive. Her desire to preserve her family may impel her to keep sex going with her husband, if he’s a good father and provider etc., but it will tend to become more of a duty, almost like a prostitute. This will not necessarily be odious to her. That’s highly dependent upon her beliefs. It will however stop being anything she wants to get strongly into.

    That’s how it often goes. Myself, I don’t know how you keep a relationship passionate for longer than about 4 years, or 6 at the outside. I mayself have never experienced it / done it.

    Dave in Hawaii’s newly found, mid marriage, alpha game may be a successful example. It’s almost as if he became a different man for his wife though.

    LikeLike


  702. on May 13, 2009 at 11:26 am doug1

    Bhetti

    It is one of the worst betrayals by a human being. I can’t even imagine doing that to a man. Not only cheating on him, not only not lying to him, not only bearing another man’s child but making him become emotionally and in every other way invested into that child, for years and years. The multitude of wounds that sort of thing opens in a man’s soul, heart, mind and pride. It’s enough to shatter a human being’s whole identity and inspire the worst of misanthropy.

    I don’t understand the mentality that can say anything about this is not outright repulsive.

    Ah Bhetti.

    My Bhetti.

    Sweet.

    LikeLike


  703. on May 13, 2009 at 11:27 am xsplat

    Tupac, pulling out some nuggets of wisdom with a speculum

    This is true, but these men are a tiny tiny fraction of the types of men most women are cheating with.

    For the vast majority of affairs, the woman is moving laterally or even downwardly in the pursuit of higher testosterone, i.e., personal trainers, suave foreigners, pool-boys, F-300 driving contractors, etc.

    I made my comment already. Seems to me I know where you get your ideas from – inform me otherwise.

    LikeLike


  704. on May 13, 2009 at 11:39 am doug1

    Bhetti

    It’s pathetic. I’ve had absolute childish bitchfits about absolutely nothing with a beta and the very moment he got angry — the very moment — I’d stop and be sweet and apologise and be regretful. Yet, he still wouldn’t tell me to shut it when I’d come out with b/s as soon as I did it, but let me go on until I’d crossed so many lines.

    Silly weak little boy.

    I knew I was hurting him and I didn’t even know why I kept on, when it’s so out of character for other human interaction. I can recognise that, now, I think (maturing) and am learning to stop myself first. I’m trying to like myself, so I don’t want to keep doing the bitch routine.

    Leave playing martyr to the women, which is their natural fantasy (if we want to generalise).

    You have been maturing very noticeably these last several months before my very eyes baby. Really and truly.

    Recall my saying to you last night on this blog: “I love the woman you’re becoming.”

    (Feeling sunny.)

    LikeLike


  705. on May 13, 2009 at 11:40 am David Alexander

    Yet, he still wouldn’t tell me to shut it when I’d come out with b/s as soon as I did it, but let me go on until I’d crossed so many lines.

    Quick Reply: That’s because whenever we tell you to shut up, you either become angrier or sad which induces the guilt complex within men like myself. It’s much easier to put up with your shit than to actually say shut up.

    LikeLike


  706. on May 13, 2009 at 11:46 am xsplat

    pez

    Yes Xsplat….

    Its too boring otherwise, safety and security create the foundation for true discontent in a mate. Keep them guessing, keep the game going, otherwise the search begins to start a new game…

    I think family oriented men tend to not be able to fit this fact into their worldview. Some on this blog would prefer to re-social-engineer society, such that women are shamed into being what we want of them. Rather than to admit the simple fact that security kills passion.

    Family men want and need security. And yet security kills passion, and without passion there is a likelyhood of straying, which usually means no security. It’s a paradox many men can’t piece together into a seamless whole.

    Security requires huge, massive risk taking, and many, many losses. The only security in the end is to not require it in a specific shape.

    LikeLike


  707. on May 13, 2009 at 11:48 am doug1

    David Alexander–

    That’s because whenever we tell you to shut up, you either become angrier or sad

    Nope.

    What she becomes is calmer.

    When I tell her to shut up, probably phrased as “oh shut up, will you” — she stops. Looks at me a little startled. Is quiet for a moment.

    Then she says “sorry”. Followed sometimes by “you’re right”. or “thanks for letting me vent”.

    Then she comes for a hug. Which she knows she can count on.

    LikeLike


  708. on May 13, 2009 at 11:57 am Obsidian

    Doug, Dave Alex,
    Indeed. I tell Women to “hush” early and often. Works like a champ.

    Example:

    Woman goes on and on and on…

    Obsidian: Oh Woman, hush.

    Woman: *silence*

    See how easy that is?

    O

    LikeLike


  709. on May 13, 2009 at 12:01 pm xsplat

    Doug

    When I tell her to shut up, probably phrased as “oh shut up, will you” — she stops. Looks at me a little startled. Is quiet for a moment.

    I’m very fond of “shut the fuck up, woman!” And, “make me a tea, woman!”. Said with humor and joy, several times a day. There would be no need for a make up hug if I tell my girl to shut up – she’d simply shut up, and that’s that.

    I mean, it’s not like every little emotional movement in a womans head require some sort of mental antitote, that only I can provide. What am I, a babysitter of a woman’s emotional balance?

    I think not.

    LikeLike


  710. on May 13, 2009 at 12:04 pm xsplat

    Obsidian: Oh Woman, hush.

    Ya. I hold my finger to my lips, and sound “ssshhhhhhhhhhhh”.

    Twice or three times, if needed.

    Shames them silent.

    LikeLike


  711. on May 13, 2009 at 12:08 pm pez

    Shut up? Hush up?

    How about “Enough already!”

    If you are dating women who can’t offer stimulating dialogue or debate…then it will never last past the initial get to know your body phase…

    If thats all you want then fine, but I find that superficial at best. better yet try…http://www.realdoll.com/

    an old friend of mine started the company.

    LikeLike


  712. on May 13, 2009 at 12:10 pm Puma

    My Body, My Fraud!

    The rigths of the cuckold beta-male be damned.
    Such citizens don’t have any rights.
    They just have obligations.

    Here is a beta who *almost* broke from his chains:

    http://www.news4jax.com/news/19410437/detail.html#-

    But then he had to attend some stupid wedding, and got caught by his slavemasters.

    LikeLike


  713. on May 13, 2009 at 12:11 pm doug1

    Phrases, gestures….

    It’s all in the tone, the assurance, the strength and the attitude.

    You’re the rock of Gibraltar. She’s the silly waves breaking on your rock face.

    Silly but delightful. (As long as you keep her that way.)

    LikeLike


  714. on May 13, 2009 at 12:11 pm pez

    Xsplat

    security is a fine line indeed…if you follow the 1950’s ideal TV version you’re screwed.

    LikeLike


  715. on May 13, 2009 at 12:12 pm xsplat

    If you are dating women who can’t offer stimulating dialogue or debate…then it will never last past the initial get to know your body phase…</blockquote.

    Interesting theory, but there are whole cultures that show otherwise.

    Some couples have nothing to talk about, but give and take other things they can only get from each other. Conversation needs can be met outside the relationship.

    My fundamentals are 1) sex 2) pleasant companionship, including joking about, or just hanging out quietly 3)taking care of my food needs 4) keeping house 5) not being a thorn in my side for just being who I am 6) conversation.

    LikeLike


  716. on May 13, 2009 at 12:13 pm Bhetti

    notreallytokyo: Cuckoldry is clearly not trivial. But we will end this here, some people have tried to trivialise rape.

    xsplat: I’m not complaining about the bitchiness. There’s no excuse for pointless bitchery and I’ve got the responsibility to control it. It’s just amazing how easy it is to stop me externally — they really don’t have to go that far — as opposed to internally, and how a man does not quickly learn to take advantage of that.

    I’ve been spoiled in my expectations by my brother, I think, who’s both a complete ass and a sweetheart. I love him the most out of anyone. I’m used to having to deal with him, which I guess resulted in overspill into uncensored bitchiness for the unsuspecting beta. And what’s messed up is that my brother’s gay, so no woman’s going to benefit from that fun from him. It’s strange, actually, how he never bought into the woman as a fragile, precious thing to protect (actually, probably not that strange due to our mother’s nature: not ‘fragile’). His nickname for mother and I these days when even vaguely displeased with the cooking or something is ‘prostitutes’ knowing exactly relatively how unadventerous we are, saying this even as he’s encouraging us to go have fun.

    doug: Yeah, I have noticed a change and am happier for it. Still, I don’t want to say this but you really need to stop that. Even though it makes me happy, I’m much too pleased and it matters a little too much. It doesn’t even give you a beta vibe because I know how easily you fall in love with women.

    Criticise, damn it!

    You’ll get bored eventually, Mr. I will love you 4-ever (that means for four years, dear).

    DA: You do realise the ‘easier’ part is what hurts the most about you and why I project previous pain on you. How many women have you enabled to be bitches for the sake of being the right one, the good one, the moral one, the victim who needs a hug, the one who won’t deal with it, to indulge your need for someone to point out inferiority you want to believe in? Unless they were completely lost to bitchiness, I bet you enjoyed the results of the subsequent guilt-trip on their side.

    Seriously, get out of the mentality that you somehow deserve it and that being angry at a woman will somehow break her mind/feelings. Women can handle emotions because they’re demonstrative with them. I cry myself to sleep and it’s over. Done. Move on.

    LikeLike


  717. on May 13, 2009 at 12:16 pm novaseeker

    Actually I think women’s cheating is often much worse than that. It tends to turn a vague yeaning and diffuse dissatisfaction into a sharp emotional break.

    Indeed. As has been said, when men cheat they generally look at it as supplemental to the wife, not replacement for her. When women cheat it’s the opposite — the lover becomes the replacement for the husband, and the husband becomes a roommate at best (sometimes with sex thrown in to keep the marriage together but not because she likes it) or despised at worst. But the lover is now her “relationship partner”.

    One of the many reasons why there has been, and always will be, a sexual double standard.

    LikeLike


  718. on May 13, 2009 at 12:16 pm Bhetti

    doug: My silly waves will gradually erode you. You watch. 😉

    LikeLike


  719. on May 13, 2009 at 12:16 pm pez

    okay…your right about the tone, etc….but that game goes both ways….

    LikeLike


  720. on May 13, 2009 at 12:18 pm Game in BK

    I read this somewhere in some science magazine.

    Blue eyed men have a genetic (subconscious) preference / attraction for blue eyed women.
    Blue eyed women have NO preference in their mate’s eye color.

    If both the mother and the father have blue eyes- so will the child- thus if the mother cheated, and the child had dark eyes- the father would know.
    I guess this was an ancient male paternity test of sorts.

    LikeLike


  721. on May 13, 2009 at 12:26 pm xsplat

    pez

    Xsplat

    security is a fine line indeed…if you follow the 1950’s ideal TV version you’re screwed.

    I’m lucky in that I don’t have an internal desire at odds with what I can expect out of life. I like it that lovers come and they go. The river will roll, roll roll.

    LikeLike


  722. on May 13, 2009 at 12:27 pm doug1

    Bhetti–

    It doesn’t even give you a beta vibe because I know how easily you fall in love with women.

    Naaah. I like and can even feel affection for lots of different girls and like to find the fun in them. That’s not the same as falling in love girlfriend.

    The reality babe is that you’re an incredibly jealous little minx that’s protecting herself from hurt. Even though we’re an ocean apart in space, a religion apart in culture, and a a lot apart in years (seeing how you’re just barely no longer a teen), you STILL get jealous of ANY little flirting I do on here with anyone else. Just an amazingly green eyed girl you are.

    There you go. And true to boot.

    LikeLike


  723. on May 13, 2009 at 12:30 pm pez

    There are also cultures that arrange marriages, that manage to be successful as well, but that doesnt mean having nothing in common but heat…

    Xsplat your list was; 1) sex 2) pleasant companionship, including joking about, or just hanging out quietly 3)taking care of my food needs 4) keeping house 5) not being a thorn in my side for just being who I am 6) conversation.

    My top 6 are 1. hot sex 2. humour 3. confidence 4. intelligence 5.appearance 6. adoring me….

    conversation should just happen with all that…”joking about” means your conversing, so does hanging out quietly if its comfortable.

    LikeLike


  724. on May 13, 2009 at 12:31 pm Bhetti

    Reality sucks. And it’s utterly hypocritical jealousy to re-boot. Emotions: messed up.

    LikeLike


  725. on May 13, 2009 at 12:34 pm pez

    For now, but aren’t you worried that at some point that rolling river won’t be enough? it never gets old for you?

    LikeLike


  726. on May 13, 2009 at 12:43 pm sara I

    nilk

    A woman who conceives a child outside the marriage is perpetrating a massive fraud that damages all parties when it is uncovered.

    But, since his wife is flawed, that’s okay.

    No, not really. It’s just the truth that they are both flawed. My worldview may be harsh, but I don’t promote victimhood in general. Those who play victim repeat the same mistake over and over and over….. Been there.

    LikeLike


  727. on May 13, 2009 at 12:47 pm kim

    Obsidian,

    I feel like the government is involved in too much already. Like I said somewhere above…it would be great if the government didn’t have to get involved in things like child support, etc. but because people are too stupid to handle things responsibly…they get involved. I guess it’s a political view that I usually will apply to most situations. I just believe in less government, not in a Republican way, but more in Libertarian way.

    Lurker,

    Settle down. First, why is my name in quotes like it may or may not be my real name? Second, I have no idea what an internet troll is. Third, I really like how you quoted the part where I commended Obsidian for being one of the better debaters here because of his absence of words like “cunt” and then continue to throw a few “cunt”s in there anyways. Bravo, you are truly an idiot.

    LikeLike


  728. on May 13, 2009 at 12:53 pm Obsidian

    Kim,
    Let me ask you this, please: do you support Roe v Wade? Or the recent rulings regarding Plan B birth control? If your answer to either is “yes” then you do indeed support state intervention in the upholding of Women’s reproductive rights. Why then this cannot be extended to Men in this instance is something you have not made clear to me or dare I say, to this venue.

    Please clarify?

    Thanks.

    O

    LikeLike


  729. on May 13, 2009 at 1:00 pm Bhetti

    kim: Less government = vigilante misognyist males in this thread given free reign. Fun. They shouldn’t interfere between a man and his wife.

    LikeLike


  730. on May 13, 2009 at 1:02 pm xsplat

    pez

    For now, but aren’t you worried that at some point that rolling river won’t be enough? it never gets old for you?

    How can fresh experiences get old? It’s the old experiences that get stale.

    I’m not the least bit worried about of living a rancid, stale, tepid and tamed life. I leave that to the monogamous family men worker drones.

    LikeLike


  731. on May 13, 2009 at 1:10 pm doug1

    Bhetti

    What do you think of my four stage progression and rough timing of most women’s love and sexual feeling for a husband she did fall in love / lust with initially? For ease, HERE.

    Leave out the cheating in stage 4. Then what, six years into a marriage with an alpha? Say a lesser alpha, who’s strongly loyal.

    Maybe you’re just to young to set to this question. If so you’ll give platitudes or say you don’t know.

    Or you could surprise me.

    LikeLike


  732. on May 13, 2009 at 1:11 pm Bhetti

    kim: just to let you know, I really don’t want that to happen. There’s a compromise between non-governmentally restrained misogyny AND misandry, and that’s governmental MPT. It in itself will help the women who otherwise will be tempted to keep their legs shut.

    doug: I realise you’re drawing me into your version of reality and don’t know (or want to know?) how to do a thing about it, trouble.

    LikeLike


  733. on May 13, 2009 at 1:11 pm kim

    Obsidian,

    I do, but the way I see it, abortion should have never been made illegal or legal. People should be able to get abortions if they want to. And if they’re against abortion…then don’t get one. People should be able to get paternity tests if they want to. I know that by saying this I’m opening the door for “well does that mean their shouldn’t be laws against murder?!” etc questions. Hopefully it won’t reach that trivial level though.

    LikeLike


  734. on May 13, 2009 at 1:13 pm xsplat

    Pez, you know what I really don’t get? It’s when people can’t understand how life can have any real and lasting meaning, unless you have kids. It’s when people assume that kids are a retirement package that will keep you from being lonely in your age.

    I don’t get it. Seems so silly and strange to me. I live for life. I like life. I’m glad and happy to be alive. I want more of that. I don’t need any kids. I don’t even want any kids. Maybe I’ll have some (new ones), but they won’t be the purpose or meaning of my life.

    Finding purpose and meaning through kids is like enjoying Christmas because that’s when Santa Claus arrives. The kids are tangential to purpose and meaning – they don’t cause it.

    Mama, mama many worlds I’ve known since I first, left home.

    LikeLike


  735. on May 13, 2009 at 1:17 pm doug1

    kim–

    It’s perfectly apparent to me that you’re fundamentally and deeply lying to Obsidian, and others on this board.

    What you really want is to let women married to weaker betas who are decent providers, slip through with an alpha’s love child undetected. That’s if those betas can’t pass your test of having the stones to request / demand a paternity test without state automatic requirements of all men.

    In other words you’re really taking a sort of middle stance. You support any man with any balls in his wanting a paternity test. You oppose shrill feminists who e.g. want to make all such tests if requested /demanded by HUSBANDS (but not wives) illegal. (Incredibly enough women’s groups have pressed for that in the UK and I believe Australia.) You’re in Oz, right?

    If you would admit that, I’d have renewed or reborn respect for you. As it is at the moment, not so much.

    LikeLike


  736. on May 13, 2009 at 1:18 pm Bhetti

    doug: It’s very difficult to be objective about anything you say for me now. I’m just agreeing in theory. I haven’t observed enough women who have fallen in love or women who cheated or known them well and long enough to say.

    LikeLike


  737. on May 13, 2009 at 1:19 pm Obsidian

    Actually Kim,
    Abortions were legal in roughly half of the states in the union, including New York prior to Roe v Wade in 1973. The case was more a cause celebre than a cause for real concern because just about any Woman who could put together the money to make the trip to an Abortion State could get one. Roe herself could have easily hopped a plane flight from her native TX, went to NY and had the procedure done.

    So, again, while you may not theoretically see the need for the state to be involved, what is clear is that you both support RVW and by extension, at the very least recognize the need for the state to safegaurd it. Again, it is not clear why you cannot extend this same protections to Men who have real concerns about the paternity of kids assigned to them.

    Please explain?

    Thanks.

    O

    LikeLike


  738. on May 13, 2009 at 1:27 pm Comment_Gig

    Gig said:

    as Tupac Chopra said, men’s infidelity doesn’t diminish his hability to be a husband or father, unless he fathers a son outside marriage, which I believe should be harshly punished and those sons highly stygmatyzed, together with their moms

    Gig, unlike Spanish and Portuguese, where the h is always silent except in special cases, in English, the h is almost always spoken. Especially starting a word.

    IE:
    hability is actually ability

    Still, your impressively good at English.

    I also believe that the posting of another thread so soon has cut short the manically expanding life of this poor thread. Roissy, how could you kill such a active, lively thing? Killed in the bloom of youth, gaining 50+ comments an hour?

    *Doing my part to help thread-count reach 900.

    LikeLike


  739. on May 13, 2009 at 1:27 pm Bhetti

    kim: it wouldn’t be cost-efficient to test everyone. Only those dads (and maybe some odd females) who want it, and she really has no right to say no except for her own DNA being swabbed. There may be the rare ‘hospital swap’ scenario tragedy, which wouldn’t be found out unless she accepted for her DNA sample to be taken but there you go.

    LikeLike


  740. on May 13, 2009 at 1:27 pm doug1

    Bhetti

    doug: I realise you’re drawing me into your version of reality and don’t know (or want to know?) how to do a thing about it, trouble.

    No Bhetti. I’m not being Machiavellian. I’m looking for truth. You bring your own partially culture bridging, interesting perspective.

    So draw me into YOUR version of reality instead.

    So far you’ve chosen the “I don’t know” little kid option.

    Do better. Shine some light. You can’t tell me you don’t think and read about these kinds of things a lot.

    I just wrote out a scenario that might keep passion strong for more than six years or so but I’m withholding it (cutting and pasting it elsewhere) for now to avoid polluting your mind or giving you a pre fab answer.

    LikeLike


  741. on May 13, 2009 at 1:28 pm gig

    “there are lots of us”

    I agree that if you visit a country, like it, and have YEARS to plan, it is quite easy to become an expat, anywhere.

    It should be pretty obvious to all that doing the same thing in a few months is unrealistic.

    LikeLike


  742. on May 13, 2009 at 1:35 pm gig

    comment_gig

    I’d better make a mistake in one letter than write 300 of them without saying anything

    LikeLike


  743. on May 13, 2009 at 1:35 pm kim

    Doug,

    I don’t know how I’m lying. I don’t approve of cheating, and I don’t know where I said that. I think that men should be able to ask for a paternity test if they feel it is necessary. If the woman says no, then by all means take the action to do it w/o the woman knowing. Or, if a man doesn’t want to ask, then they can just do it themselves anyways. I don’t know if what I’m asking for is necessarily Oz. It’s somewhat idealistic apparently, even though I didn’t think it was originally.

    Obsidian,

    If their concerns are real, then they can ask for it. Or do it themselves.

    LikeLike


  744. on May 13, 2009 at 1:36 pm doug1

    Bhetti

    doug: It’s very difficult to be objective about anything you say for me now. I’m just agreeing in theory.

    You are such a girl!

    LikeLike


  745. on May 13, 2009 at 1:46 pm novaseeker

    Incredibly enough women’s groups have pressed for that in the UK and I believe Australia.

    Actually, Doug, I don’t think it’s incredible that women’s groups want to ban the tests. It’s logical. These tests represent the biggest threat to a part of women’s wired sexual strategy since the imposition of hard, enforced monogamy long ago. Women are fresh on the heels of their victory in overthrowing enforced monogamy a few decades ago, and so it’s no surprise at all that women’s groups would come out against this new threat.

    LikeLike


  746. on May 13, 2009 at 1:47 pm pez

    Hey Xsplat,

    I don’t feel that purpose of meaning of life comes for kids either, though certainly at moments they bring laughter, tears, and love…but I’m digressing.

    I only speak of my wisdom from my own father. He was a true Alpha player briefly smitten by my mother. He was quite good at the game and was getting many women while still in his 60’s at least half his age, but once an illness took hold of him and captured him for the last ten years, it was his kids that brought him most of his happiness, there are many lonely moments in illlness…. though at his wake I did meet 2 of his more recent paramours, I smile at thinking he still had it going on.

    LikeLike


  747. on May 13, 2009 at 1:50 pm Bhetti

    The long-term Arab married women I know don’t seem to have lost those stage 1/2 feelings exactly, because they’re the ones who want more attention, more love, more sex from him. There was one little family who have been a couple for over a decade in which I’d come across a certain blue pill upon helping them clean. I don’t know if it’s affection, social/financial restriction or loyalty to their family that keeps them at home but certainly it’s not noticing other men that’s the thing that makes them go to botox extents and so on to stay looking lovely.

    The males — on the other hand — seem to have fallen out of love with them ages ago. I wonder if that plays a part in all of their behaviour. My mother won’t stop sadly/angrily recalling where it all went wrong with my dad in between bouts of saying how much she respects him. She won’t say yes to any sort of interest from men, even though she very occasionally acknowledges one as being attractive and she’s pretty much divorced.

    LikeLike


  748. on May 13, 2009 at 1:50 pm doug1

    kim–

    I don’t know if what I’m asking for is necessarily Oz.

    I was asking if you live in Australia = Oz. Guess not. (It was a little side question, irrelevant to my main point.)

    What I was saying kim is that the reason you give for you opposition to legally mandatory and routine paternity testing at birth is bogus.

    It’s not really concern about yet more state invasion of our lives. I do believe you care about such things; it’s just that since the state already tests for e.g. syphilis and other things, it’s hardly any more or a privacy invasion.

    Instead you deeply emotionally don’t want to help out betas who don’t have the stones to get the test done themselves, either by getting their wives to agree, or by doing it surreptitiously. You don’t want the wives of betas without those stones to be precluded from having a love child with a stronger male. I understand that. That other male could be me.

    You’ve actually more or less converted me to your position. I’m adamantly opposed to making paternity testing initiated by men illegal or difficult. But maybe I’m willing to back off making it automatically required.

    The attitude of all men with any balls at all should be that of course any woman that presents him with a child is going to be subject to paternity testing. Count on it baby. Trust but verify. As a matter of course for you personally, as a man.

    LikeLike


  749. on May 13, 2009 at 1:51 pm novaseeker

    The problem with the “if they want it they can ask for it or do it themselves” is that having to ask for it already places a substantial burden on the man in question. He has to weigh the emotional cost to the relationship of even suggesting he has doubts about paternity, on the one hand, against the potential benefit of avoiding a false paternity. That’s an undue burden, and places men in a very difficult situation. Having the tests happen as a matter of course just makes it a routine thing — no emotion-laden conversations, no intimations of suspected infidelities and the like — just a routine test and the chips fall where they may.

    As for doing it themselves, that is fine, as long as the tests are usable in court. A trend we have seen in a few countries, however, is that the do-it-yourself tests are being hemmed in and banned. Germany for example now requires the mother’s consent before any DNA test can be binding before a family court. That consent can be overridden by the man applying the family court, but the family court can still refuse to mandate the test if it determines that a negative outcome would be harmful for the child. That kind of legislation is going to spread to other countries, I am guessing.

    LikeLike


  750. on May 13, 2009 at 1:51 pm doug1

    kim

    But I continue to not like you’re lying about it. Which you continue to do.

    LikeLike


  751. on May 13, 2009 at 1:53 pm xsplat

    Gig

    It should be pretty obvious to all that doing the same thing in a few months is unrealistic.

    As I said, it depends on the portability of your income stream and savings. Many people earn their keep via the internet. In that case its of no importance where you live. Others have skills that are in demand anywhere. Still others are flexible and inventive. Seems none of those describe you, so you might require years.

    LikeLike


  752. on May 13, 2009 at 1:57 pm Bhetti

    Thinking of one (non-Arab) happy couple I saw, who seemed to still have gooey feelings, they just seemed to get the dynamic right with relentless playfulness between them, as well as him casting himself in a rather masculine, ‘quiet now woman’ role. I don’t know why they weren’t bored of each other.

    LikeLike


  753. on May 13, 2009 at 1:57 pm xsplat

    Nova

    The problem with the “if they want it they can ask for it or do it themselves” is that having to ask for it already places a substantial burden on the man in question. He has to weigh the emotional cost to the relationship of even suggesting he has doubts about paternity

    I couldn’t get past this part of your post, the notion was so emotionally revolting to me.

    I guess it’s true. Betas are deeply despised.

    Any man who feels it a burden and emotional cost to the relationship to bring up doubts is not worth protecting. I don’t buy it that it’s for the betterment of society, as betas are the backbone of all that is worthwhile – the steady worker bees and engineers. Bullshit. I call shenanigans.

    A man with no stones is not a man I protect.

    LikeLike


  754. on May 13, 2009 at 1:59 pm sara I

    lurker

    Roissy, mandatory testing would be ideal, and should be required. I fear it won’t come about because of lying bitches like Hax and Sara I and anony.

    Bitch, yes. Lying bitch, no. Get your facts straight honey. Mandatory testing of any kind is a sticky wicket.

    LikeLike


  755. on May 13, 2009 at 2:07 pm lurker

    “Mandatory testing of any kind is a sticky wicket.”
    —spoken like a true lying bitch terrified of losing her cuckolding abilities.

    LikeLike


  756. on May 13, 2009 at 2:09 pm novaseeker

    I guess it’s true. Betas are deeply despised.

    Any man who feels it a burden and emotional cost to the relationship to bring up doubts is not worth protecting. I don’t buy it that it’s for the betterment of society, as betas are the backbone of all that is worthwhile – the steady worker bees and engineers. Bullshit. I call shenanigans.

    A man with no stones is not a man I protect.

    And you’ve just revealed why men will always hate each other.

    LikeLike


  757. on May 13, 2009 at 2:10 pm xsplat

    it was his kids that brought him most of his happiness, there are many lonely moments in illlness…. though at his wake I did meet 2 of his more recent paramours, I smile at thinking he still had it going on

    That’s sweet. In my own way I too am a family man. I avoid prostitutes and disco chicks, as I crave bonding. I create families, let them go when the bonds break, and create new ones.

    I don’t see my elderly years as empty, unless I have kids. I also don’t see kids as any guarantee of companionship in old age. I wonder what percentage of time it works out that children hang out with their elderly parents. Any guesses? Twenty five percent? Sixty?

    My Dad has a very rich and full life, indipendent of his children. He may never see any of us again, before he offs it. I don’t think he’ll need us, in that moment. I think he’ll be hugely satisfied and as ready as the richness of a soul can make a man be.

    My life is nearly always full and rich. And I’m short and balding and ugly. What’s age going to change?

    LikeLike


  758. on May 13, 2009 at 2:10 pm Obsidian

    Nova brings up a powerful point w/the “undue burden” argument, and note the clear parallel to the Roe v Wade/Casey v Planned Parenthood cases, where a big part of the rulings rested on the “undue burden” piece. This is more than a personal matter, but one that has grave economic and social implications; even if 4% of the US population is effected, that means potentially *millions* of people at risk. Therefore, the state has a compelling interest to sort this all out and nip it in the bud before things get messier than they already are.

    That Kim cannot offer a cogent, compelling case as to why the very same state that safeguards Women’s reproductive rights can’t or shouldn’t, be extended to Men (please note similar arguments made against Matt Dubay’s case) is extremely telling both in its blatant hypocrisy and lack of intellectual rigor, to say nothing of a show of rank dishonesty, w/all due respect. I have asked Kim numerous times to please explain her position, and she either can’t or won’t, all the while citing grevious harms that will come to abortion as a result of the passage of MPT-yet, as I’ve demonstrated here, a very strong case can be made for MPT, on the very same basis that brought RVW into existence.

    This is a very simple case, people. One that begs for logical consistency-either Men have, in legal terms, the same rights to Reproductive Freedom as Women, or they don’t.

    Which is it?

    O

    LikeLike


  759. on May 13, 2009 at 2:12 pm lurker

    Kim, bieng the feminazi she is:

    “Settle down.”
    –said the woman making hysterical comparisons between killing her child *in the womb* and her child having a blood test * shortly after birth.*

    “First, why is my name in quotes like it may or may not be my real name?”
    —Your real name is probably leslie. And you drive a harley.

    “Second, I have no idea what an internet troll is.”
    —-google it.

    “Third, I really like how you quoted the part where I commended Obsidian for being one of the better debaters here because of his absence of words like “cunt” and then continue to throw a few “cunt”s in there anyways.”
    —-cunty cunt cunt skank whore slut.

    Now please, go try to get the state to intervene to force child support payments and give a woman half a man’s hard earned estate because of a marriage contract and then whine about MPT being the state intervening in a person’s life. Just let the cuckolds be fooled and pay me, damnit!

    Don’t forget to spread your legs for the cable guy, whore.

    LikeLike


  760. on May 13, 2009 at 2:13 pm lurker

    O, demanding logical consistency from a woman is like demanding a dog speak English. they are incapable, too stupid, and too wholly enjoy their ignorance to try.

    LikeLike


  761. on May 13, 2009 at 2:13 pm xsplat

    Nova

    A man with no stones is not a man I protect.

    And you’ve just revealed why men will always hate each other.

    No, you missed the meta narrative. No general admits into his army weaklings. Hazing is the ritual used in bootcamp.

    Man up, or piss off.

    LikeLike


  762. on May 13, 2009 at 2:13 pm sara I

    PA

    Why do so many men walk on eggshells with their women? Where’s the damn fear coming from?

    The fear is very real. Here’s one take on the subject. Guess who?

    There are biological reasons for the fear. Women are capable of multiple orgasms, man is not. No man is capable of satisfying any woman. If the woman is allowed freedom she will make anybody afraid, because she will make you feel inferior. She is capable of multiple orgasms–within seconds she can have many orgasms–and you can have only one orgasm. And with one orgasm you are finished! She has not even started and you are finished–this is very embarrassing. Because of this fear man has repressed women all over the world.

    It is not that man is stronger and that’s why he has repressed women, no. It is out of fear.

    …..if she becomes an active partner she will reduce the man to almost nothingness. If she becomes active, man is very much afraid–how is he going to satisfy her? All his manhood will be at stake. He will no longer be capable of bragging that he is a man, something higher, superior. Sexually he is not; sexually he is inferior.

    There are even countries in Africa, where operations were done on small girls: their clitorises were cut when they were very small–a very painful operation–just to make sure they don’t have any idea of orgasm.

    This quote is a bit dated, but evolution is slow.

    LikeLike


  763. on May 13, 2009 at 2:15 pm sara I

    lurker

    Don’t forget to spread your legs for the cable guy, whore.

    Tell me, dear lurker. How’s your mother these days? *wink*

    LikeLike


  764. on May 13, 2009 at 2:16 pm novaseeker

    No, you missed the meta narrative. No general admits into his army weaklings. Hazing is the ritual used in bootcamp.

    Man up, or piss off.

    It’s “men” like you that have caused the current situation to come into being. You despise other men. A sorry excuse for a member of our sex, and emblematic of exactly how we got to the current situation.

    LikeLike


  765. on May 13, 2009 at 2:17 pm xsplat

    lurker

    O, demanding logical consistency from a woman is like demanding a dog speak English. they are incapable, too stupid, and too wholly enjoy their ignorance to try.

    There you go again, using male standards and thought patterns to describe women. You are not even trying to grok them.

    Women are not stupid. They are just not logical. They are clever at being women. Women need to be inconsistent and illogical and have no ability for introspection, in order to be clever at being women. A women’s job demands those attributes.

    You have no clue even what a women’s job is. You think it has something to do with your agenda. It does, only in as much as the separate agendas intersect. Which is, not much.

    LikeLike


  766. on May 13, 2009 at 2:19 pm sara I

    lurker

    “Mandatory testing of any kind is a sticky wicket.”
    —spoken like a true lying bitch terrified of losing her cuckolding abilities.

    Settle down, sweet lurker. I had a hysterectomy. The world is now a safer place.

    LikeLike


  767. on May 13, 2009 at 2:20 pm kim

    Doug,

    I thought you meant Oz…like wizard of Oz. How embarrassing.. oops :-/ I’m living in London right now but I’m from Chicago. And I still don’t see how I’m lying!

    LikeLike


  768. on May 13, 2009 at 2:22 pm xsplat

    Nova – how do you imagine I spent my youth? Do you think in high school I was a jock?

    No – I was a geek, and spent plenty years as a pro-feminist nice guy.

    Wonderfully nice. You can polarize me into some hard ass enemy, if that suits your ideological needs.

    I’ll make this simple. Boys who refuse to become men deserve to be treated as boys. Do you agree? Let’s not quibble about what is the definition of boy. You keep your own – whatever that means to you.

    I don’t respect men who choose to not be brave. I have no use within my circle of men who can’t stand up for themself. If I were to arrange a troup of like minded compatriots, it would not include men too weak minded and feeble hearted to speak their minds. To a mere woman.

    LikeLike


  769. on May 13, 2009 at 2:25 pm doug1

    novaseeker–

    The problem with the “if they want it they can ask for it or do it themselves” is that having to ask for it already places a substantial burden on the man in question. He has to weigh the emotional cost to the relationship of even suggesting he has doubts about paternity, on the one hand, against the potential benefit of avoiding a false paternity.

    The time to require paternity testing is when she has first fallen in love with you. I’m entirely serious.

    See THIS that I wrote up thread.

    Don’t fall into the trap of being considered anxious that she’ll cheat on your. Rather have the view that we live in a rampantly and growing female cheating culture, that’s what feminists and to a large extent the media push, and that you as a man aren’t having it and will be all Nazi about it. Deal.

    LikeLike


  770. on May 13, 2009 at 2:28 pm Obsidian

    Sara,
    That quote-am I correct that it’s from Osho?-only applies to Man who are ignorant, selfish and/or inexperienced. A well trained Man in the Ways of Women will be able to satisfy her in ways that *she* will be fearful to leave him. Afterall, Women know, that a good Woodsmen is hard to find.

    O

    LikeLike


  771. on May 13, 2009 at 2:31 pm Comment_Gig2

    Gig, I wasn’t trying to put you down. I don’t do passive-aggressive.

    Many people here can only speak one language, and I’m much worse at my second language than you are at yours. So if I think your stupid, then I most be really stupid. Okay?

    I can see that I’ve been failing to respond to comments you have been making throughout the thread.

    This wasn’t intentional. I simply didn’t read them. The thread is HUGE.

    gig wrote:

    once you own child support payments in America, unless you hold a FOREIGN passport, you will be deported. You can think that it is possible to disappear in the Third World, but once you use a credit card, it is as easy to find you as if you were in california

    This is about as useful, or less so, than my comments. My comment about leaving the country was overly optimistic. It was a butterfly and rainbows comment, ignoring all the problems. However, your comment is an equally useless, extremely negative statement. You are basically saying, ‘YOU CAN’T ESCAPE, KNEEL BEFORE YOUR GOD!’.

    People disappear in America, which believes in constant surveillance of it’s ‘citizens’. You can see it in the ‘Missing Children’ posters where the child went ‘missing’ with their father/mother/grandmother. I can only imagine how bad it must have been for the child for a 70 year old grandmother to go on the run to protect her grandchild.

    Anyway, I’m quite sure things are less tracked in third-world countries, so it is easier.

    Sure, maybe some people will have to outright BUY citizenship. But we are talking about 100,000 dollars or more in child-support expenses in many cases and half your assets as the other ‘alternative’.

    Really, be specific. What would be the specific problems with moving to Brazil?

    LikeLike


  772. on May 13, 2009 at 2:31 pm gig

    alice-in-the-wonderland-in-indonesia

    I won’t brag about myself on the internet. I leave that line of argument for you.

    Do you realize that a judge in the US can freeze your assets in ANY bank operating in the US, don’t you? if you transfer your savings from Citigroup to the Bank of Indonesia, which almost certainly operates in New York, they will be under American jurisdiction.

    you must have an account in a local bank, or a fiscal heaven. Or have an account under someone else’s name. or convert your saving in real estate in other country. How does the cheated husband justifies a trip to Indonesia, alone?

    look, alice-in-indonesia, a guy with the vision and balls to plan and do this all in 3 months WOULDN’T BE cheated in the first place. Your advice, and Roissy’s, to “move your assets elsewhere” works only for those who don’t need it.

    tell me, how much time passed since you bought your first ticket to Indonesia until you got the resident’s VISA?

    LikeLike


  773. on May 13, 2009 at 2:43 pm doug1

    Bhetti

    Thank you girlfriend. See, I knew you could add things of interest. You did.

    The long-term Arab married women I know don’t seem to have lost those stage 1/2 feelings exactly, because they’re the ones who want more attention, more love, more sex from him. *** The males — on the other hand — seem to have fallen out of love with them ages ago. I wonder if that plays a part in all of their behaviour.

    And from your next post:

    Thinking of one (non-Arab) happy couple I saw, who seemed to still have gooey feelings, they just seemed to get the dynamic right with relentless playfulness between them, as well as him casting himself in a rather masculine, ‘quiet now woman’ role.

    One way or another, keep the woman hungry. Maybe not entirely secure either, at least not from time to time. Though certainly your second scenario seems the much happier one.

    In my observation alpha male cheating (that she discovers) can re-ignate a relationship also — IF the alpha really does still love his wife, and if she’s got a lot on the ball herself. He’s got to reclaim her though. It helps if he always at least hinted he might cheat but not leave her or stop loving her in all ways. Lots of drama down this path.

    To be honest the scenario I outlined up thread to the extent I’ve lived it (though I’ve never had a woman that’s lived with me cheat on me, I’m quite sure) has been partly of my own making. It’s complicated. One live together relationship sort of automatically timed out. (Texas stripper off to law school at my urging, but not until after a couple of great years.) But in a couple of other cases I engineered an end in other ways. Through cheating without reclaiming basically, and letting her go. Even though I could have made open work in at least one of the cases. So blame me.

    My current love may be a keeper. Ah, hope springs eternal. But no, really. Green eyes – though only sort of, I know.

    LikeLike


  774. on May 13, 2009 at 2:46 pm xsplat

    Gig, I’m not going to talk about my own specific details.

    Asset management and anonymity are difficult skills to learn. But they are not unrealistic skills for a bright and inspired man to aquire.

    The process can be tackled in incremental steps. Travelling can start with tourist visas and savings. New income streams can be developed. New places to put savings can be aquired. Assets can be moved from the State into places where the State has no access. People do all these things all the time. It isn’t science fiction, or some James Bond ubermensch scenario. Its mere financial planning and carreer management. Not rocket science.

    And every man, even the ubermensch, is expected to have women troubles. What good is a life without women troubles?

    LikeLike


  775. on May 13, 2009 at 2:52 pm gig

    http://travel.state.gov/law/info/info_608.html#agreements

    reality bites utopia.

    http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/international-law-issues/11442-extradition-law-between-us-israel-failure-pay-child-support.html

    notice that Israel is NOT in the first list. Nonetheless, the wife can still get an international arrest warrant against the man once he owns her more than 5000 USD. it won’t extradite him, but I guess he won’t be able to leave Israel anymore or renew his American passport

    xsplat is making two mistakes in this thread: an utopian view that it is easy and fast to emigrate (that works for dirty poor people in dirty poor countries) and, a mistake that half of the people in this thread make, that ALL cuckolded guys suddenly makan alpha conversion and turn from David Alexander omeganess to G manifesto alphaness

    LikeLike


  776. on May 13, 2009 at 2:55 pm Tarl

    A crappy life as a slave to pay for some other man’s kid, or a crappy life “off the grid” in the USA, or a crappy life in some foreign hellhole. What a choice!

    LikeLike


  777. on May 13, 2009 at 2:56 pm gig

    xsplat

    i agree with you that it is possible. We disagree about how easy and how fast it can be done. And about how difficult it becomes once you don’t have time. Would you hug sincerely a child you just discovered is not yours? Women are EXTREMELY good in noticing this kind of stuff.

    Once the guy knows about cuckoldry, even my 3 months estimate is to much. He’s got probably only a few weeks

    I posted a few links that you, PA and comment_gig might find interesting, but tehy are stuck in moderation

    LikeLike


  778. on May 13, 2009 at 2:56 pm xsplat

    Gig

    look, alice-in-indonesia, a guy with the vision and balls to plan and do this all in 3 months WOULDN’T BE cheated in the first place.

    Where do you think balls come from, anyway?

    From jumping into risky situations, where you have no choice but to succeed. Again and again.

    Why do you think women like Alphas? Because they are the ones who survived that process.

    Risk taking is sexy, because it makes a man or a dead man out of you. No boy will survive the process.

    LikeLike


  779. on May 13, 2009 at 3:04 pm xsplat

    Gig

    Would you hug sincerely a child you just discovered is not yours? Women are EXTREMELY good in noticing this kind of stuff.

    Once the guy knows about cuckoldry, even my 3 months estimate is to much. He’s got probably only a few weeks

    I have no idea how much time it would take for corporate wage earner to learn how to make it overseas. The task would be huge.

    – aside – I was in an internet cafe in Thailand, when the power went out. One guy was using his laptop, and kept typing as if nothing had happened. For him, nothing had. “Oh, you are lucky you are using your laptop”, the cafe owner commented. “No, it’s not luck”, the laptop user replied.

    You ask if I could sincerely hug a child that I found out was not mine. That assumes that up until that point, I was not making my own luck. That I had not already taken preventitive measures. That I would be unprepared for that eventuality.

    And when you assume that I would have only a few weeks or months, that also assumes that I didn’t have the ability to quickly make new options, within whatever country I was living in.

    I have many types of contingency plans, always.

    LikeLike


  780. on May 13, 2009 at 3:04 pm doug1

    xsplat–

    What good is a life without women troubles?

    LoL.

    I can tell you one thing. I have absolutely no idea.

    LikeLike


  781. on May 13, 2009 at 3:06 pm Bhetti

    O/sara: That quotation’s simplistic pseudo-logic (which does nothing for promoting the feminist cause), which completely neglects natural anorgasmia and — from what we’ve seen in misogynist patriarchies — men don’t give a crap about satisfying her unless there’s something in it for him. I am exaggerating a little: There is truth to it, but it’s too simplistic, he doesn’t have to sexually satisfy her in terms of actual orgasm in order to reproduce with her. Read this examination on Cultural suppression of female sexuality, which I’m rather enamored with at the moment.

    doug:

    You are such a girl!

    Here I was all along, thinking you noticed! More fool me. I am a young female and with a completely silly little crush on you (who, public shame of saying these exact words considering the venue and a certain previous post, I know nothing about). I really just likes to ask all the questions rather than necessarily having the answers. I’m no genius or piercing analyst. I genuinely surprise myself if I can come out with something decent. Probably why it frightened me to death for you to challenge me to.

    I’m not sure if I’m being entirely rational when I say keep her in my typical pro-forever (not 4ever, doug, not 4ever) stance. Maybe it’s the girl thing.

    I saw an awesome elderly couple in the GP the other day. The man was in a wheelchair (and it kinda seemed his memory was going). Still, he was funny and cocky and made all of us laugh including his wife. She was the one who remembered all his medications and clearly took care of him.

    It’s a really strange picture of what to hope for, even when things don’t seem that good via stereotypes.

    LikeLike


  782. on May 13, 2009 at 3:08 pm lurker

    Xsplat:

    “You have no clue even what a women’s job is.”
    —to suck my dick and make me dinner.

    “You think it has something to do with your agenda.”
    –no, I don’t.

    LikeLike


  783. on May 13, 2009 at 3:10 pm lurker

    sara, trying really hard:

    “I had a hysterectomy.”
    —Thank goodness for small miracles.

    “The world is now a safer place.”
    –unless your husband gets your current children tested….then the shit will hit the fan.

    “How’s your mother these days?”
    —just fine. How’s your syphillis?

    LikeLike


  784. on May 13, 2009 at 3:16 pm doug1

    Tarl–

    A crappy life as a slave to pay for some other man’s kid, or a crappy life “off the grid” in the USA, or a crappy life in some foreign hellhole. What a choice

    As social action, the law should be changed. No man should have to pay child support for a child that didn’t issue from his DNA, unless he’s knowingly agreed to do so in writing. (It’s a VERY weighty decision, more so than buying a house or other real estate, and should have similar agreement in writing protection against fraudlent claims, which women wiil, OH YEAH, be very prone to make.)

    Meanwhile as personal action let any girl who falls in love with you, when she asks whether you want kids someday (and she will) know that of course you’d expect immediate routine paternity testing at birth. Trust but verify. If she continues to object after you with utmost serenity tell her it’s a deal breaker, dump her. She’s just massively failed a very important shit test, whether for feminist ideological or deep need to cheat reasons. Either way or combined she reeks. Next.

    LikeLike


  785. on May 13, 2009 at 3:23 pm Bhetti

    “How’s your mother these days?”
    —just fine. How’s your syphillis?

    That there is fun dialogue. That’s the uncensored chick flick I want to see.

    doug: ease the filly in gently, bless. You can’t just throw unconventional ideas like that out of the blue without setting her up. I would’ve totally went ‘WHAT? I WOULD NEVER CHEAT, YOU —!’ (especially coming from a society where even such coming close to aspersions are unthinkable), not listen to reason and then allow him to get away. That conditioning is very common and she’d have to adore the hell out of you plus not listen to the girlfriends to not reflexively react like that.

    LikeLike


  786. on May 13, 2009 at 3:24 pm gig

    Q. WHAT IS THE TEXT OF THE ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND RECIPROCATING COUNTRIES?

    A. The Text of a model international child support reciprocity agreement with the Untied States is on our site.

    The text for agreements already in force is not yet available on line, but is under construction. As each agreement becomes available here, you will be able to select the individual country or province listed below to access that information.

    Australia
    Canadian Provinces: British Columbia, Manitoba, Nova Scotia
    Czech Republic
    Ireland
    Poland
    Portugal
    Slovak Republic

    from the US department of State. The whole link is awaiting moderation

    fun question: now that Obama is president, is the list above going to:a)increase (b)decrease (c)stay the same?

    LikeLike


  787. on May 13, 2009 at 3:26 pm gig

    My wife’s ex-husband returned to Israel two months ago and has since has stopped making child support payments (he hold an American & an Israeli citizenship). He should be paying for the next eight years.

    Under international law or extradition agreement between the US and Israel, can we apply for a petition/motion to request that Israel will extradite him back to the US? And will they? Can we claim it’s a felony?

    We assume it will be a lengthy process and we are not wealthy. Should we even spend the time and money on this endeavor?

    Thanks

    ANSWER: If the amount is over 5000 or 10,000 dollars due you can get his passport blocked and can seek a felony warrant for his arrest. They likely will not extradite but he will have a warrant for his arrest and at some point they may snag him.

    LikeLike


  788. on May 13, 2009 at 3:29 pm gig

    dude, you don’t have 10 years. you got a few months before your passport is blocked

    LikeLike


  789. on May 13, 2009 at 3:34 pm joeindc44

    BTW, Hax has a live Q&A session on Thursdays if anyone would like to ask her to clarify her viewpoints on parasite children.

    LikeLike


  790. on May 13, 2009 at 3:37 pm doug1

    Bhetti-

    doug: ease the filly in gently, bless. You can’t just throw unconventional ideas like that out of the blue without setting her up. I would’ve totally went ‘WHAT? I WOULD NEVER CHEAT, YOU —!

    You’re right about that of course.

    See how much it helps me when I have you by my side?

    LikeLike


  791. on May 13, 2009 at 3:54 pm xsplat

    lurker

    Xsplat:

    “You have no clue even what a women’s job is.”
    —to suck my dick and make me dinner.

    “You think it has something to do with your agenda.”
    –no, I don’t.

    Lurker, you are being as bad as Kim, in your lack of grasp of irony and introspection.

    What is the job of a woman, from HER point of view. Your answer – to suck my dick and make me dinner – and that has nothing to do with your agenda.

    At least women have sexual characteristics that interest me. A man with the brain power of a woman can’t hold my attention for long.

    LikeLike


  792. on May 13, 2009 at 4:07 pm xsplat

    Gig, I will concede that some men are too embeded within their social/political systems to be able to escape.

    I’m not such a man, and I know that any inspired and bright man can also be not such a man.

    LikeLike


  793. on May 13, 2009 at 4:08 pm xsplat

    economic/social/political systems.

    Be a free man. You’ll appreciate the change. Unless you are some cur who prefers to be a pet.

    LikeLike


  794. on May 13, 2009 at 4:09 pm Bhetti

    Just to throw it in here, paternity’s an important Islamic issue influencing a lot of ‘rules’. It’s an important justification used for not allowing polyandry or adoption in its true form: adoption’s replaced with the idea of something roughly translated as ‘sponsorship’ where the adoptee must be made aware of their origins and not abandon their identity of them, nor their proper surname if they have one, and cannot be considered true family in some matters e.g. a sponsored male can marry their sponsor’s daughters and thus all the non-family protections apply.

    doug: Have you always been this talented at quickly picking up your cues from what people say? The wiser choice is always to remember your medication yourself… still, glad to be of ‘help’, trouble. I know what you did. It’s amazing. Let’s grow old together, without the sap. You mean man, you can’t go around saying such things.

    LikeLike


  795. on May 13, 2009 at 4:18 pm novaseeker

    Read this examination on Cultural suppression of female sexuality, which I’m rather enamored with at the moment.

    Isn’t this the one that says that female sexual oppression did not originate in men but in women, due to the desire to keep the supply of sex low?

    LikeLike


  796. on May 13, 2009 at 4:18 pm Obsidian

    I’d just like to note a few things while they’re still on the grey matter.

    It has been suggested by some, that those who advocate for MPT are in fact not only regressives bent on rolling back Abortion rights and the like for Women, but are indeed Misogynists of the worst kind. While there are many Men who are more than capable of speaking for themselves, I thought to give my own personal views on the matter, and then address Old British Common Law.

    For me, personally, the charges are utterly baseless and devoid of any truth in fact-while I am Pro Life I accept the laws of the land, and recognize the right of Women to do as they will with their bodies; moreover, speaking to the larger Seduction Community, I dare say that if a poll were taken that the overwhelming majority of Men within it and the MRA community I might add, would favor the Pro Choice position. Indeed, this was the case when the Matt Dubay case was being waged in court, which fell on deaf ears, both the courts and the feminist allies therein.

    I do not hate Women indeed my understanding of Game has given me an appreciation of and in many cases, an empathy for Women that I did not have previously; nevertheless all of this is beside the point. What is at issue here is accountability, on the part of the one who’s decisions in the matter are not only unilateral but final and irreversible-the Woman’s. All I and indeed, most advocates of MPT ask is that a measure of accountability be taken. No one wishes to shuffle Women back into the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant as it were.

    As for OBCL, what is striking on the part of those who consider themselves feminists, is that they rail against Marriage as a Patriarchal institution bent on dehumanizing Women enmasse, yet seem to have no qualms using key elements of the very same institution to dehumanize and literally enslave Men. Old British Common Law holds, that *any* kids born during the life of a marriage, are automatically presumed to belong to the father, regardless as to the kids’ true origins or not. It is this truly calcified, outmoded feature of marital law, that is at the heart of the current debate now, and forms the basis of many rulings in the face of documented DNA evidence proving that said kid is not the father’s, and hadn’t been in many cases, for years-the only conclusion being, that he was duped, since the only party who has any real idea who the true daddy is, is the momma.

    Again, this feature, a dinosaur in our time given the massive changes that have come to marriage over the past three to four decades, forms the basis of many a ruling in both married and even cohabitating couples, when it comes to Paternity Fraud.

    In other words, Women want it both ways-they want to be “liberated” from aspects of marriage and even cohabitation that they find restrictive, but also want restrictions placed on their spouses/duped daddies. One is hardpressed to think up a bigger conceit.

    Again, the issue wrt MPT comes down to the very argument feminists made for Roe v Wade more than 35 years ago-does a human being have the right to determine when or even if, he or she is to become a parent, or not?

    Well?

    O

    LikeLike


  797. on May 13, 2009 at 4:20 pm doug1

    Bhetti

    The wiser choice is always

    Wiser schmizer.

    I LIKE having you by my side. Wisdom be damned.

    You know everytime I hear you say “trouble” to me, I start to get a little hard.

    Maybe I can get you to chant it or something??

    LikeLike


  798. on May 13, 2009 at 4:26 pm Tarl

    It has been suggested by some, that those who advocate for MPT are in fact not only regressives bent on rolling back Abortion rights and the like for Women,

    No need to roll back the right to an abortion – only the “right” to force a man to pay for a kid that’s not his.

    Hax has a live Q&A session on Thursdays if anyone would like to ask her to clarify her viewpoints on parasite children.

    Geez, do you really need any further clarification on what a Harvard-educated Fembot who works for the Post is going to think about anything?

    LikeLike


  799. on May 13, 2009 at 4:27 pm Bhetti

    doug: this is the point where I have to be embarrassed, while suppressing the urge to type ‘trouble’ over and over and over. Anyway, you have no clue how I sound, so you can’t hear me. Now go expend your perviness on your flavour of the 48 months.

    LikeLike


  800. on May 13, 2009 at 4:33 pm anony

    Having read these later comments, I’ve learned
    -Roissy readers function without trust– a strange and alien concept to them.

    Novaseeker stated the practical crux: The problem with the “if they want it they can ask for it or do it themselves” is that having to ask for it already places a substantial burden on the man in question. He has to weigh the emotional cost to the relationship of even suggesting he has doubts about paternity, on the one hand, against the potential benefit of avoiding a false paternity. That’s an undue burden, and places men in a very difficult situation. Having the tests happen as a matter of course just makes it a routine thing — no emotion-laden conversations, no intimations of suspected infidelities and the like — just a routine test and the chips fall where they may.

    I understand the burden that he and others have described. No one would want to be in that situation. So, his options are
    -1) to man up and ask the question. “Honey , for reasons X, Y, and Z, I am doubting my paternity of this child.” You know me, and that my mother cheated on my father, that I’ve been distrustful since, and haunted that it could happen to me.” I will clear any doubts by having a paternity test done on the baby tomorrow afternoon at 3. ” The downside cost is the humiliation for the wife, but she benefits in greater understanding of his emotional needs.
    -2) taking the baby for the test without the wife’s knowledge
    -3) asking the state to routinely do the deed for him because he is afraid to address the emotion-laden topic. The direct cost is clinical time and test materials. The huge cost is paid by all new mothers who are presumed to be guilty of infidelity and misappropriated paternity by the state. The test makes them feel humiliated and guilty until proven innocent.

    MPT is for cowards.

    LikeLike


  801. on May 13, 2009 at 4:42 pm Rod

    Anony – Is this your first time using shaming language? Your attempts seem transparent and quite amateurish. Perhaps these little tricks work on your feeble beta husband, but they are not going to work with this crowd.

    LikeLike


  802. on May 13, 2009 at 4:42 pm doug1

    Bhetti–

    Too explicit != pervy.

    Ok, ok, maybe that was over the top on here. (but it’s true.)

    *chastened* (sort of)

    while suppressing the urge

    Hmmm.

    LikeLike


  803. on May 13, 2009 at 4:46 pm Tarl

    The idea that doing a paternity test without asking her is “cowardly” is simply dumb. She is not harmed in any way if she doesn’t know about it and it turns out you are indeed the father. The idea that she needs to “understand your emotional needs” by telling her something she doesn’t need to know is absurd. Basically anony wants to deter men from doing this test at all by forcing them to do something there is no reason to do (tell the wife about it).

    I love the way that in case 1, anony calls on men to have the courage to ask their wives to submit to a paternity test when they are unsure, but contends in case 3 that poor, defenseless women do not have the courage to submit to a test that cannot harm them unless they are cheating whores. How about this: all women need to “man up” and submit to a mandatory state-administered test, so there!

    LikeLike


  804. on May 13, 2009 at 4:48 pm doug1

    anony

    “Honey , for reasons X, Y, and Z, I am doubting my paternity of this child.”

    Simply dreadful advice. The worst possible script. Well I guess even worse would be to hemm and haw and then finally admit under questioning what you suggest offering in explanation.

    Men.

    Instead simply say before marriage that you’ve long decided it would be your policy with any woman under all circumstances. It’s too big a deal, and there’s too much female cheating out there these days (despite her being the last person, blah, blah, blah) to not “trust but verify”.

    That men is the RIGHT way to do it. Though with the set up Bhetti suggests depending on and addressing where she’s coming from culturally.

    LikeLike


  805. on May 13, 2009 at 4:48 pm Chic noir

    MU Nevertheless, from all that I’ve personally read from Chic herself, she would NOT choose to go out w/a Beta Male, and neither would the vast majority of the ladies who regularly post here. Most of them have clearly stated their preferences, and Beta Males aint it.

    Wrong, I have gone out with beta males. I never stated that I hate beta males. There are many types of Beta males and most men are beta males. Hill Harper would qualify as beta but I find him very attractive.

    Mu, I would really like for you to post where I said such a thing. Pull it up from the archives.

    mu Most of them have clearly stated their preferences, and Beta Males aint it

    The type of slacker beta who has no goals, ambitions in life and only hobby is playing video games, is unattractive to most women, yes. Most betas don’t fall into this category, most are the men you see on the train going to work every morning-beta. The men you see with their families at Disney World-beta. The construction workers you see in a dive bar drinking with their coworkers after a long day’s work-beta. It is what it is and I have no hate for those men nor the slacker beta. Only thing is, while I’m turned off by the slacker beta, the other three are relationship or husband material for most women including myself.
    Men do the same in that all of you want the girl you could be in King or SI yet the average man will end with a 7 at best. Does that mean a guy is evil for lusting after a 10 he sees in the magazine or looking discreetly at the 9’s he see on the streets-NO. Such a man being human and just responding to nature or nurture instincts. Again folks it is what it is.

    mu Chic has also said, not long after she made the remark referred to above, to Dave Alex, that he would be unsatisfactory because “he couldn’t protect her”.

    Very true. Note, DA meets my threshold for attractiveness, as well as intelligence and having hobbies, a few of which I share. Quick note: I have a lot of respect for DA’s intelligence as I’v noted here numerous times. I personally can’t see myself with a dumb man no matter how good-looking. A dumb man ranks even lower than one who is unwilling to protect me.

    muThe harsh truth is that Chic and other ladies will drop their drawers for the Roissys of the world a heck of a lot faster than for the Dave Alex’s.

    Uh, kindly remove my name from that list. Having a man who is willing to protect you does not translate into dating someone like Roissy. Just because a man is good at sleeping around doesn’t correlate with being willing to protect you. There are some men who would run if confronted by a bigger stronger man(no gun), leaving their woman to fend for herself. Sorry, I just can’t get with this type of guy.

    Furthermore Mu , I’ve mentioned(look into the archives) that I put distance between myself and men with that Obama/Clinton aura. I don’t like the way they make me “feel”. Yes I like good-looking men, no I don’t apologize for that but I’ve dated men who are not “10”s. I date men who I would call “6”s. So what, you aren’t into size 00s and I don’t begrudge you that, Roissy isn’t in to big booty chics I don’t begrudge him that either . We all have our preferences.

    Now a Whiskey, MB or Peter type is more my speed. I don’t see either of the two running away if they have to protect their family from an armed intruder, but otherwise they are easy going. I don’t like drama, and I’m the type who can entertain herself fairly easy on the cheap. In other words, I don’t need a man who will smoother and he needs to be the same. I have my own hobbies and he should have his.

    LikeLike


  806. on May 13, 2009 at 4:50 pm Bhetti

    anony: Hmm, from my viewpoint, the best model is mandatory in an ‘opt out’ style — mandatory to stay in if any of the parents want it — i.e. there will still be an element of ‘at risk’. People are more likely to view things as ok if their choice is opting out rather than opting in. It isn’t cost-efficient and it will have to be out of the pocket of whoever wants it: state, man or even ‘well, er, actually, who IS the daddy?’ woman herself. Men may not want this enough for it to be widespread to be destigmatised and I can certainly see any government justifying itself on why it shouldn’t cough up any money for it. They’d still have to confront their women and the government would have to stand up to some very loud groups to actually put something like this through.

    Pushing for MPT, I think, is more a vehicle for widespread men’s rights protesting rather than a coward’s way out. It forces the common man to think ‘well, actually, I have the right to this if I want it…. do I want it?’

    LikeLike


  807. on May 13, 2009 at 4:53 pm xsplat

    …that female sexual oppression did not originate in men but in women, due to the desire to keep the supply of sex low?

    Seems to me that most social mores come from women, and most shaming of women comes from other women.

    So that origin of sexual repression makes good sense. Or at least as one of many origins. After all, who hates sluts more than other women?

    LikeLike


  808. on May 13, 2009 at 5:01 pm xsplat

    Doug – I don’t get it. Why must there be any agreement with the wife? Why not just get it done?

    Am I missing something?

    LikeLike


  809. on May 13, 2009 at 5:15 pm doug1

    xsplat–

    Doug – I don’t get it. Why must there be any agreement with the wife? Why not just get it done?

    What I’ve been talking about is establishing routine paternity testing as a fact of the relationship from the beginning of it’s become serious and potentially child producing / supporting.

    That will be a factor in helping to prevent cheating.

    In addition, when the woman has consented to testing, it’s by any and all feminist theories or laws out there, admissible in court.

    However, failing all that, sure, I’d just do it on the sneak tip if I had to.

    Capish?

    LikeLike


  810. on May 13, 2009 at 5:15 pm anony

    @bhetti,
    the common man has always “had the right” to testing. I see no good reason why the common man can’t take care of his own insecurities, rather than burden the state with them.

    I understand the ease of “opt out”, but that doesn’t make it beneficial to all parties involved. I take umbrage at being treated this way by the state, just to please a few trust-deficient men.

    LikeLike


  811. on May 13, 2009 at 5:21 pm anony

    @Rod,
    I don’t advocate shaming, but if a man can not address an emotion-laden topic with his wife, then he is handicapped. Asking the state to address the topic is weak.

    LikeLike


  812. on May 13, 2009 at 5:22 pm Obsidian

    Again we see the hemming and hawing-what about the very real medical concerns here? What about this-does the child have the right to know his/her true parentage is? Or not?

    MPT easily solves these matters, and the costs are easily dealt with-the happy daddy pays for the test which is simply bundled into the rest of the hospital bills. No daddy? No problem, mommy pays for it, afterall, it was *her choice* to bring the baby into the world.

    Ok, so what’s the next excuse?

    O

    LikeLike


  813. on May 13, 2009 at 5:22 pm doug1

    anony

    the common man has always “had the right” to testing. I see no good reason why the common man can’t take care of his own insecurities, rather than burden the state with them.

    Transparently disingenuous.

    The cost to the state when this stuff is done in volume would be trivial. Besides, it could be state mandated but privately paid (in private health cost payer systems). Part of the routine costs of child birth. Again, trivial addition when done in the millions or hundred thousands every year. $25? less?

    Remember it’s estimated that in 10% of all births, paternity is mis-attributed.

    LikeLike


  814. on May 13, 2009 at 5:25 pm anony

    @Tarl,
    The idea that doing a paternity test without asking her is “cowardly” is simply dumb. She is not harmed in any way if she doesn’t know about it and it turns out you are indeed the father.

    I agree with you. (option 2 above) I have more respect with the man who arranges the test to be done, with or without the mother’s knowledge, than a man who petitions the state to do it for him.

    LikeLike


  815. on May 13, 2009 at 5:26 pm anony

    @doug,
    the $$ is the least of it.

    LikeLike


  816. on May 13, 2009 at 5:26 pm xsplat

    Oh, ya, I get it now, Doug. You explain to her about paternity testing as one means to avoid infidelity. Ya, sounds good.

    My means of avoiding children is to explain that I have a passport.

    LikeLike


  817. on May 13, 2009 at 5:28 pm doug1

    anony–

    I don’t advocate shaming,

    Sure you do. Do you not advocate shaming straight up, no nuance, hate filled racists?

    I advocate a return to strongly shaming careless sluts who become single mothers. The failure to keep that up, at feminist behest, has greatly contributed to the explosion in the percentages of outside of marriage or any other committed relationship childbirth. At 70% it’s highest in the black community, but has reached the mid or high 20% range in the non latino white American community.

    If a man can not address an emotion-laden topic with his wife, then he is handicapped. Asking the state to address the topic is weak.

    So what?

    Any woman who requests or “needs” welfare is self evidently weak.

    LikeLike


  818. on May 13, 2009 at 5:28 pm Bhetti

    anony:
    You are discriminating against a minority! PC brigade, attack! I kid.

    The problem may be the trust overfilled men, who’ve had it done to them. You’re thinking of yourself and of the trust-deficient men when I’ve outlined a common scenario right where I am where it’s the child themselves who discover it via things like blood types. What kind of trauma is that?

    That sort of scheme has a much higher chance of benefiting men, who deserve to benefit and would not ordinarily be ‘trust-deficient’ enough to make it happen.

    doug:
    You deserve to be called pervy for your relentless teasing and torture, including the mysteriousness.

    No lie, I enjoy it and encourage it (not the mysteriousness). Still: I’m realising very deeply how I have no equivalent flavour of the 48 months to expend on so I am inches from madness. Entirely self-inflicted and an interesting form of masochism.

    It was inappropriate in the sense that you don’t want to start using poor abused roissy’s blog (or anywhere else!) for…

    No, I will not go to first cyberbase with you.

    (Am blaming you for what I’m responsible for. How many bets somebody’s going to go ‘women, eh?’)

    LikeLike


  819. on May 13, 2009 at 5:29 pm Obsidian

    Anony,
    Throughout this thread I have laidout what I consider very measured and reasoned arguments in favor of MPT. If you disagree, perhaps you can go through them and come up an even better reasoned counter argument? I welcome the chance to be corrected.

    O

    LikeLike


  820. on May 13, 2009 at 5:31 pm anony

    @Obsidian,
    MPT easily solves these matters, and the costs are easily dealt with-the happy daddy pays for the test which is simply bundled into the rest of the hospital bills. No daddy? No problem, mommy pays for it, afterall, it was *her choice* to bring the baby into the world

    If you want to talk cost, Obsidian, which is the least of the concerens, then whose gonna pay?
    -Medicaid (ie NO one)
    -Daddy? ( rarely, almost never see cash payers)
    -private insurance ( denial of payment certain)
    -Medicare ( doubtful the mother is >65)

    So, in the end, by your options, NO oNE will pay. The hospital will eat it.

    LikeLike


  821. on May 13, 2009 at 5:32 pm doug1

    anony

    the $$ is the least of it.

    Remind me.

    What again is the MOST of it?

    LikeLike


  822. on May 13, 2009 at 5:32 pm anony

    Again Obsidian,
    The non-payment is a trivial point.
    The presumption of guilt, the humiliation are the problems.

    LikeLike


  823. on May 13, 2009 at 5:37 pm Obsidian

    Anony,
    Please review my post above. But to even more directly answer your question Anony, I think it fair to say that this is *one* instance where Men enmasse will be only too happy to defray the costs of MPT in the form of their tax dollars, should it come to that-I certainly would be willing to do that. Its one instance where I can potentially see public spending potentially benefitting *me* should I need it.

    What say you, brothers? Yea, or nay?

    O

    LikeLike


  824. on May 13, 2009 at 5:40 pm anony

    @doug,
    On shaming:
    preemptively shame to prevent the transgression, forgive after the transgression.
    Yes, preemptively shame single mothers and welfare beneficiaries.

    LikeLike


  825. on May 13, 2009 at 5:40 pm doug1

    anony–

    The presumption of guilt, the humiliation are the problems.

    10% are guilty. What’s wrong with catching them?

    There may or may not be serious consequences. That depends on her husband. Many of the weak men you “aren’t shaming” will probably forgive and forget. Bhetti’s opt out idea works better here actually.

    LikeLike


  826. on May 13, 2009 at 5:40 pm lurkingsince08

    Two things:

    1. The first Google result for “mandatory paternity test” is a Roissy post from 2008 advocating mandatory paternity tests: http://roissy.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/mandatory-paternity-testing-has-arrived/
    2. A former Tony Blair advisor believes the negative effects of out-of-wedlock births are so bad it’s time for the state to force bady-daddies to marry baby-mommas: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/labour/5250767/Couples-with-children-outside-wedlock-should-be-married-by-the-State.html

    If anyone else linked to these stories…well, I’m not reading through 800+ comments.

    LikeLike


  827. on May 13, 2009 at 5:43 pm Obsidian

    Anony,
    It was *you* who brought up the non payment trope in the first place, w/all due respect. I am simply saying that is the least of our problems because in so many ways it is easily handled. Like Kim you have not given a clear, cogent and rational, let alone logical, reason as to why MPT should not be done given the massive changes on the marital and cohabitation fronts in our time. As mentioned earlier I have posted a series of very well laidout arguments in favor of MPT. I await your equally reasoned counter arguments to MPT in opposition. Come, let us reason together.

    O

    LikeLike


  828. on May 13, 2009 at 5:44 pm anony

    @Obsidian,
    I think it fair to say that this is *one* instance where Men enmasse will be only too happy to defray the costs of MPT in the form of their tax dollars, should it come to that-I certainly would be willing to do that. Its one instance where I can potentially see public spending potentially benefitting *me*

    OKay, that made me laugh to envision taxpayers protesting to demand to be taxed for MPT, 🙂 🙂

    at the cost of humiliation by almost all women, and the loss of “innocent until proven guilty”. HUGE cost.

    LikeLike


  829. on May 13, 2009 at 5:48 pm Bhetti

    anony: Let’s give you an alternative scenario for your psychological health: ‘My man had a relative who had cystic fibrosis and is so scared of it, he wants to test if I’m a carrier. We’ve never had cystic fibrosis in the family. It’s understandable, it’s not about presuming my genes are defective but simply confirming the assumption that they aren’t’.

    Pain, humiliation? What about the relative pain/humiliation of cuckold fathers or kids who discover it? Can you not think about them, be altruistic and simply… get over it and stop crying about something actually quite trivial for your non-cheating self?

    Yes, you’re tested. Because some women do it and don’t care about the possible consequences. Humanity bears the humiliation and pain for its actions collectively. Do I really want my bag searched at the airport? No. Do I recognise it’s a security measure? Yes.

    LikeLike


  830. on May 13, 2009 at 5:49 pm anony

    @Obsidian,
    certainly you grasp the gravity of the “guilty until proven innocent” constitutional shift. Seriously, you want all women humiliated and subject to maternal testing (with presumption of guilt until proven innocent) Is that really want you want? I’m not usually a “slippery slope” worry-wart, but “what would be next?

    LikeLike


  831. on May 13, 2009 at 5:53 pm 87

    Seriously, you want all women humiliated and subject to maternal testing (with presumption of guilt until proven innocent)

    This does not “humiliate” women any more than routine drug testing humiliates athletes or job applicants.

    The irony is that the mandatory nature of the testing is precisely why it is NOT humiliating.

    —

    Anony, answer the above analogy.
    Do you think that routine drug testing humiliates athletes and job applicants?

    LikeLike


  832. on May 13, 2009 at 5:53 pm anony

    @bhetti,
    a trust-deficient man can deal with it privately with his wife.
    a cystic fibrosis scarred man can deal with it privately with his fiance.

    LikeLike


  833. on May 13, 2009 at 5:54 pm doug1

    anony-

    at the cost of humiliation by almost all women, and the loss of “innocent until proven guilty”. HUGE cost.

    This is again transparent horseshiite.

    If it’s routine for all births it will humiliate none but the guilty. If 10% of all births have misattributed paternity, that probably means that in at least 25% of cases the woman will have some worry about what the test will show. After all, in most cases of cheating the woman is still having sex with her husband more often, if only to hide it.

    I think it’s pretty obviously why you’re arguing so obstinately.

    It’s clear to me you either are a cheating wife, or thing there’s a good chance you will be one.

    LikeLike


  834. on May 13, 2009 at 5:56 pm anony

    @87,
    routine drug testing is welcomed by the athletic community because it keeps sports clean. it might otherwise be a wide-spread problem.

    LikeLike


  835. on May 13, 2009 at 5:56 pm doug1

    87

    The irony is that the mandatory nature of the testing is precisely why it is NOT humiliating.

    Bingo.

    Exactly right.

    You know what’s humiliating? Being show by scientific proof to have cheated on and lied to your husband, with the prospect that he won’t owe any child support as a result of his pre parenting discovery.

    That’s the humiliation that anony is insisting on and feeling, and transferring to “all women forced to undergo the test”.

    She knows she’s gonna get caught, or might well be in the future.

    LikeLike


  836. on May 13, 2009 at 5:57 pm novaseeker

    Opt out is not a bad idea. That way it is automatically on the table and the decision tp opt out can be made in that context.

    The non-shaming shaming is quite funny — so easy to spot, actually.

    LikeLike


  837. on May 13, 2009 at 5:57 pm Obsidian

    Anony,
    Since you seem to be concerned with the “guilty until innocent” theme, and since Kim has brought up Abortion, let’s consider a few things along those lines, while we await your well thought out counter arguments against MPT, shall we?

    You may recall the Duke LaCrosse case that took place a few years back-Crystal Gale Mangum, a Black stripper, accused, on her sole authority and witness, three White Duke students of not only raping her but of also making racial taunts, rising the crime to a Hate Crime. Of course in the end the charges were proven fallacious, but the damage had been done-to this day, statements made in favor of Mangum on the part of many of the Duke U faculty, have not been rescinded.

    And that is hardly an aberrant case-accross the country and indeed in other countries, false rape allegations are rampant. And what’s worse, the Man in question is guilty until proven innocent, w/only the sole word of the aggreived party, the Woman, needed to cast a pall over this Man’s entire reputation, career, indeed his very life.

    Yet, Women like yourself didn’t seem all that interested in being heard in opposition to Mangum’s actions, even when it was proven false-indeed, if anything, websites like Pandagon and Feministing were keen to keep on keepin’ on, truth or facts be damned. There was no “fact finding or truth telling” to be done on Oprah, she didn’t find it important to air the story. She did find it necessary to give Don Imus a piece of her mind though.

    If ever there was a case that made a mockery of the crime of rape the Duke case was it, and where were the feminists? Nowhere to be found. As per usual.

    Bringing it back to the question at hand, Men are considered guilty until proven innocent everyday in family courts, presumed the daddy even when its proven he’s not. You rail against the very prospect of MPT on what it might do to Women, yet you say nothing about Paternity Fraud has indeed done to many Men. Interesting.

    Still waiting for those keen counter arguments.

    O

    LikeLike


  838. on May 13, 2009 at 6:01 pm anony

    @doug,
    I think it’s pretty obviously why you’re arguing so obstinately.

    because I prefer to be treated with respect by the state,
    becasue I believe in small government, not a daddy-state to interfere with private/family matters
    becasue I believe in a presumption of innocence.
    because I live in a culture of trust

    your way off the mark on the infidelity idea. spotless I am.

    LikeLike


  839. on May 13, 2009 at 6:07 pm 87

    @87,
    routine drug testing is welcomed by the athletic community because it keeps sports clean. it might otherwise be a wide-spread problem.

    BINGO.

    If you don’t see the EXACT analogy here, then either (1) you have a hopelessly naive view of women**, or (2) you are beyond hope.

    —

    **If this is the case, bless your heart, because that would make you one of those few women who are morally righteous enough that they could actually hold a naive view of their own gender.

    LikeLike


  840. on May 13, 2009 at 6:08 pm anony

    @Obsidian,
    Men are considered guilty until proven innocent everyday in family courts, presumed the daddy even when its proven he’s not. You rail against the very prospect of MPT on what it might do to Women, yet

    Obisidian,
    my first suspicions at the Duke case were that the stripper was lying. HOnestly. I awaited facts just like everyone else. funny for you to address that topic because I work in medicine, and “collect the facts” myself in rape cases. (very few available in the medical details but done anyway) I’m fully aware there a slimmy women with lame “rape” stories.

    I would support any man in a Paternity Fraud case–facts supporting of course.

    LikeLike


  841. on May 13, 2009 at 6:14 pm anony

    @87
    analogies are a weak form of argument. your analogy is better than most presented here, BUT, the majority of all new mothers gain nothing by MPT; it is an invasion of family privacy, an assault on her presumption of innocence. Athletes gain collectively because it keeps their competitions viable.

    LikeLike


  842. on May 13, 2009 at 6:16 pm novaseeker

    Okay since you asked for a response from me, anony, here you go:

    I think you are using classical shaming tactics — it is “weak” for men to ask the state for mandatory DNA testing. I’ve been through enough shaming tactics in my life to recognize it for what it is — an attempt to derail the rational analysis of something by driving past that and trying to get at a man’s insecurities around masculinity and sexuality. And it’s pretty ineffective with me.

    On the substance, I don’t think mandatory DNA testing is any more accusatory or humiliating than the testing that is already done for any number of things at birth (see: http://www.ynhh.org/maternity/after_born/tests.html). One of them screens for syphilis (legally required) — isn’t that humilating, too?

    The bottom line here is that if the test is mandatory and routine and applied to every person, it can’t possibly be accusatory or humiliating — it is simply a routine test like a blood test. It’s only accusatory if a particular woman is singled out for the test — *that* would be saying: “aha, we suspect you were unfaithful”. If the test is routinely performed, it’s just a routine thing — no accusation or humiliation involved for women who have nothing to fear from the test results.

    LikeLike


  843. on May 13, 2009 at 6:21 pm Dave from Hawaii

    Whatever894@Yahoo.com…I sent you whatever pages I was able to save before he deleted them from the web.

    doug –

    Dave in Hawaii’s newly found, mid marriage, alpha game may be a successful example. It’s almost as if he became a different man for his wife though.

    Nah…it was more like a wake up call and a reconnection with the kind of man I was when I was a bachelor. I unknowingly and ignorantly fell into Beta behavior during marriage.

    I was NOT like that when my wife and I first started dating. We dated for a long time before we got married…I think that had I been Beta during that time period, she wouldn’t have said “I do” in the first place.

    *Doing my part to help this thread reach 900.

    LikeLike


  844. on May 13, 2009 at 6:23 pm 87

    BUT, the majority of all new mothers gain nothing by MPT;

    They also LOSE nothing, darling. Why do you refuse to admit this?

    it is an invasion of family privacy

    It isn’t.

    A routine check to assure that “family” doesn’t need the quotation marks is not an unacceptable invasion of privacy.

    You’re defining “family privacy” to mean “WOMAN’S privacy”. This is not good.

    —

    If you don’t like my analogy, here’s a better one:

    I’m a little pissed about the security checks at airports.

    And I understand that a VERY small percentage of airline passengers are terrorists.

    However, I understand the purpose of security screening, and it doesn’t hurt my feelings.

    LikeLike


  845. on May 13, 2009 at 6:24 pm Bhetti

    anony: Slippery slope is never valid as an argument and you realise that.

    There would be nothing particularly morally wrong for screening everyone in the population for cystic fibrosis either. It’s just not done because it’s not cost or time effective and people don’t particularly want it. Still, putting such a system into place would mean that people who’re carriers could recognise this and allow them to make reproductive choices based on this. It would be beneficial.

    If it was state-mandated, it’s ‘innocent until proven guilty’. If it was individually motivated, it’s ‘guilty until proven innocent’. Either way, you’re actually projecting, because the true answer is ‘nothing until there is proof because you cannot actually generalise’.

    How many people in the airport are actually security threats? How many MORE security threats would there be if there was no testing for it? There is no presumed trust when too many women have failed. Get real.

    You simply don’t consider cuckoldry a ‘security threat’ and value certain (tenuous?) freedoms over measures against it. Which is up to you. Let them suffer! It’s not as if cuckolded men become the people who campaign for the very form of political power you despise. It’s not as if they’ll find their own answers in the form of personal fundamentalist beliefs. It’s not as if the only alternative solution to consider is to go back to locking women away from other men. Yeah, every guy just knows when she cheated on him and will perform a test himself, with or without her knowledge. He won’t find out years later. The very idea of the possibility of mandatorily being tested will not help encourage her to be faithful. Oh no. There’s no ‘benefit’. It will not altogether avoid a lot of heartache for a lot of people. Oh no.

    The state interferes all the time in family matters: divorce, domestic abuse, child custody, child abuse and neglect. To be honest, no state interference in that realm is disastrous.

    Deal with each interference on its own merits. Surely you can do this.

    LikeLike


  846. on May 13, 2009 at 6:30 pm anony

    @nova,
    On shaming: I’ll agree on “weak” but do you not believe a man who can not address “emotion laden ” topics with his wife is “handicapped”? that term may be less shaming , but still true.

    On newborn tests: to my knowledge, all other testing is genetic abnormalities, such as PKU, hypothyroidism. The STD testing of pregnancy is potentially humiliating.

    The totality of issues related to MPT for new mothers would be insulting, esp. since it can be managed on a private/family as needed basis.

    I do have some sympathy for Bhetti’s arguement that all children have the right to know of their parents. But again,it is the mother who must ensure this right.

    LikeLike


  847. on May 13, 2009 at 6:35 pm anony

    @87,
    However, I understand the purpose of security screening, and it doesn’t hurt my feelings.

    I guess it comes down to the sentiments of the majority. If few protest loudly, then an idea will prevail. Few of us would protest airport security, AND the task of security has always been in the government’s hands. Handing over a NEW task to the government ( paternity check) feels invasive and another loss of privacy.

    LikeLike


  848. on May 13, 2009 at 6:36 pm novaseeker

    On newborn tests: to my knowledge, all other testing is genetic abnormalities, such as PKU, hypothyroidism. The STD testing of pregnancy is potentially humiliating.

    The totality of issues related to MPT for new mothers would be insulting, esp. since it can be managed on a private/family as needed basis.

    I do have some sympathy for Bhetti’s arguement that all children have the right to know of their parents. But again,it is the mother who must ensure this right.

    Anony —

    Actually they take blood to perform a syphilis screen for it. Isn’t that humiliating by suggesting the mother may have syphilis?

    And you still have not responded to the point several of us have made: a test that is applied across the board to everyone is by definition not humiliating. It is only humiliating when a person is singled out for the test based on suspicion. A woman who is secure in her husband’s fidelity is not threatened in the least by a test that is performed on all babies routinely to confirm that.

    Leaving it up to the mother is like putting the cookie monster in charge of minding the cookie jar. The mother has every incentive to hide this — she cannot be trusted to do anything other than hide it.

    And your increased interest in the children knowing who their parents are as compared with the right of men to not raise children of other men without their knowledge and consent is quite transparent as to the ultimate agenda here: men have no rights with respect to this, and if there is an issue, it relates to the children’s rights, and those are of course controlled by the mother.

    LikeLike


  849. on May 13, 2009 at 6:37 pm novaseeker

    I meant to say “secure in her husband’s paternity…”

    LikeLike


  850. on May 13, 2009 at 6:37 pm anony

    @87,
    They also LOSE nothing, darling. Why do you refuse to admit this?

    they lose their privacy and dignity during an otherwise private time of their lives.

    LikeLike


  851. on May 13, 2009 at 6:40 pm gig

    potentially humilianting if the wife had been effectively unfaithful

    LikeLike


  852. on May 13, 2009 at 6:42 pm 87

    The STD testing of pregnancy is potentially humiliating.

    Now you’re getting warmer.

    It’s potentially humiliating. But that potential is only realized if the woman has STD’s.

    Similarly, MPT would only humiliate cuckolding wives. By YOUR OWN reasoning, as evidenced by your use of “potentially” above, you realize this.

    Ergo, your protest against MPT is tantamount to a defense of cheating whores.

    —

    ASIDE:

    Someone needs to smack me and tell me to stop using logic with women.
    Sigh.

    I know this in real life, but when women are just electrons, I forget that they’re women.

    LikeLike


  853. on May 13, 2009 at 6:42 pm anony

    @nova,

    a test that is applied across the board to everyone is by definition not humiliating. It is only humiliating when a person is singled out for the test based on suspicion. A woman who is secure in her husband’s fidelity is not threatened in the least by a test that is performed on all babies routinely to confirm that.

    ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE.
    -all men get rectal exams….not humiliating?
    even in the context of “medicine” , and “routine” , people feel humiliated. 87 just gave the example of airport screening, which most regard as an undignified experience. Don’t deny it.

    A woman secure in her fidelity will be annoyed, insulted, and humiliated by her loss of self-determination and interference by the state.

    LikeLike


  854. on May 13, 2009 at 6:46 pm novaseeker

    Anony —

    Unlike a rectal exam or airport screening, a DNA test does not involve any participation by the mother. A swab is taken from the mouth of the baby and the father. Are you saying that the thought that this test is taking place in another room in the hospital, out of your sight and completely inconsequential to you unless it comes back negative, is as humiliating as a rectal exam or an airport pat-down?

    You can’t be serious.

    LikeLike


  855. on May 13, 2009 at 6:49 pm gig

    MPT is exactly the kind of idea that once it becomes more widespread, will serve as an exact measure of slutiness in a woman.

    and anony, yes, your blind fanaticism against it, plus the shamin tactics, rejection of obvious analogies between your opinions and the case for MPT, make me believe that you have a very high stake against MPT. Like a bastard son. Or at least a son that may be a bastard

    LikeLike


  856. on May 13, 2009 at 6:54 pm anony

    No analogies will suffice, so an idea will be accepted or not based on the totality of its merits/benefits/consequences/cost. In totality MPT is a loser because of all the points I”ve addressed. Don’t try to sell this based upon its isolated merits to a few trust-deficit men who are handicapped in addressing an emotion-laden topic with their wives.

    LikeLike


  857. on May 13, 2009 at 6:55 pm gig

    anedocte:

    I mentioned MPT to two different groups of girls I know. Their reaction was anonyesque. Then I mentioned the fact that at least 10% of english children have an ” alternative” father

    funny to see how everything changes. None but the ugliest girl in the two groups remained with the same opinion. They all quickly understood that given the facts, being openly against MPT would be an obvious sign of slutiness. The ugly girl, being an incarnation of the roswell aliens, had nothing to lose by defending the slutty position

    LikeLike


  858. on May 13, 2009 at 6:57 pm Bhetti

    Hey, novaseeker, perhaps you Freudian slipped your way into a motivation for cuckoldry: REVENGE!

    Cheating bastard.

    You still shouldn’t raise someone else’s kid, because that is not proportionate to your crime (unless the woman scorned is Israel, then a nuclear bomb will still not be enough).

    anony: Yes. Rectal exams to catch GI problems. Airports to catch security threats. Cervical checks to catch cervical cancer. Your point? Cuckoldry is not worth it and the benefits are not worth it. The victims of cuckoldry can get over their issues, because women apparently can’t get over it according to you, even if its dealt with sensitively. Such fragile creatures we are, so empowered and yet so delicate! Oh, state and father of my child, how you wound me with your brutal accusations! I will surely cry myself to sleep every night for 10 years because a woman as having any strength is a myth.

    I don’t know, anony, not to trivialise because I know there’re people with rather… delicate.. personality types — who think the state is coming after them and restricting or questioning their choices when a representative dares to even say ‘boo’ to them — but I have (misplaced?) faith the majority of women can handle it and that the benefits outweight the costs. Still, I think you’re valuing individual freedoms over collective good on principle.

    I believe you see the collective good, now, however. As much as you ever will.

    LikeLike


  859. on May 13, 2009 at 6:58 pm anony

    @nova,
    I am saying that couching the test in “routine” “across the board” doesn’t eliminate humiliation.

    LikeLike


  860. on May 13, 2009 at 7:01 pm anony

    blah, blah, and anony, yes, your blind fanaticism against it, plus the shamin tactics, rejection of obvious analogies between your opinions and the case for MPT, make me believe that you have a very high stake against MPT. Like a bastard son. Or at least a son that may be a bastard
    blah, blah

    gig, you discredit yourself with the silly ad homens.

    I suspect you can do better.

    LikeLike


  861. on May 13, 2009 at 7:02 pm omw

    oh, God, you’re supposed to TALK to your spouse now?

    Too much communicating will kill a marriage. Save the off-the-wall shit for your girlfriends, or weirdos on the internet.

    Keep it to “did you have a nice day?” and “please pass the salt” at home. 😉

    LikeLike


  862. on May 13, 2009 at 7:02 pm gig

    once a men addresses this topic, he falls in one of three cases:

    – faithful wife+legitimate sons == poisoned marriage. It is hard to live like before after such a massive doubt

    – unfaithful wife+legitimate son == wife is a whore, but luckily the son is still his. Wife understands that it’s endgame fo her, no more wild sex with alphas. it is divorce time, then.

    – unfaithful wife + illegitimate son == divorce or miserable life with whore and bastard. She takes bastard plus aimony plus child support.

    for the man, it’s a question of minimizing losses. For the woman, it hurts the most th faithful wife, while the whoe suffers the least.

    MPT kills the problem at birth, to say

    LikeLike


  863. on May 13, 2009 at 7:05 pm anony

    @bhetti,
    Your point?

    please reread my comments.

    LikeLike


  864. on May 13, 2009 at 7:09 pm anony

    @bhetti,

    now, anony, not to trivialise because I know there’re people with rather… delicate.. personality types — who think the state is coming after them and restricting or questioning their choices when a representative dares to even say ‘boo’ to them — but I have (misplaced?) faith the majority of women can handle it and that the benefits outweight the costs. Still, I think you’re valuing individual freedoms over collective good on principle.

    bhetti, correct me if I’m wrong but you seem to have little regard for privacy, self-determination, presumption of innocence. You are willing to roll over on for “collective good”. What exactly would you stand up for? anything?

    LikeLike


  865. on May 13, 2009 at 7:09 pm PA

    oh, God, you’re supposed to TALK to your spouse now?

    Too much communicating will kill a marriage. Save the off-the-wall shit for your girlfriends, or weirdos on the internet.

    As far as marriage-smarts go, OMW is the female Dave from Hawaii!

    LikeLike


  866. on May 13, 2009 at 7:11 pm anony

    @bhetti,
    based upon the preferences of a few men handicapped in speaking with their own wives , you are ready to see a “collective good”?

    LikeLike


  867. on May 13, 2009 at 7:13 pm Bhetti

    anony: I understand what you’ve put forward as the costs and you seem to regard these as greater than any benefits. I assume you agree with other ‘humiliating’ tests, where you believe the benefits certainly outweigh the costs.

    LikeLike


  868. on May 13, 2009 at 7:14 pm Rum

    The future of Medical progress will certainly involve a lot of attention paid to individual genetics. Looking at the DNA of both parents will part of that. It is more or less inevitable that peoples genetic heritage will be studied in such a way that non-paternity will stand out like an exploding fireworks stand. It is simply over for women who have something to hide in this regard. May be not right away but years only, not decades.
    All this wimpeering from anony about humiliation etc. will simply have no place in this guy invented new medical environment.. Misleading a child about the identity of the real bio-dad will come to be seen, quite rightly, as an attack on the kids long term medical well-being.

    LikeLike


  869. on May 13, 2009 at 7:17 pm novaseeker

    Your innocence is as presumed as it is at the airport or with the syphilis test. Trust but verify. *shrug*

    Your privacy? Not impacted in the least as the procedure does not involve you, unless you define privacy as “the right to fool my husband without being caught”.

    Self-determination? Again, I suppose this means you have the right to fool your husband about his paternity without outside interference.

    These are not very substantial concerns — certainly not when weighed against the genetic suicide of a man who is investing parentally in the children of another man without his prior knowledge or consent.

    Bhetti is right. Most women will get over this, because it will have no impact on them. It will be just one of many tests done out of their sight in the hospital and they won’t even pay any attention to it — unless, of course, it comes back negative. Now THAT may cramp a woman’s self-determination and her privacy in terms of hiding her treachery, but at that point the jig is up.

    LikeLike


  870. on May 13, 2009 at 7:17 pm omw

    PA, you are too kind, sir.

    Did you have your baby yet?

    LikeLike


  871. on May 13, 2009 at 7:18 pm doug1

    omw–

    Save the off-the-wall shit for your girlfriends,

    Just who did you have in mind, Mrs. Scotty?

    LikeLike


  872. on May 13, 2009 at 7:20 pm omw

    Daddy, you don’t want to know.

    LikeLike


  873. on May 13, 2009 at 7:20 pm Rum

    Re: The Duke Case

    There is no doubt that the real criminals in that affair – Mike Nifong. Gottleib, and the Sexual Assualt nurse would have preferred in retrospect to never have done DNA testing on the yeasty nastiness draining out of Crystals Love Canal. The results exonerated the Lax guys, eventually.

    LikeLike


  874. on May 13, 2009 at 7:20 pm anony

    @rum,
    All this wimpeering from anony about humiliation etc.

    I’ve been schooled today in “shaming tactics” Rum.
    You’ve discredited yourself by using this tactic. Try again.

    LikeLike


  875. on May 13, 2009 at 7:21 pm anony

    @rum,

    and thank nova .

    LikeLike


  876. on May 13, 2009 at 7:22 pm PA

    Any day now 🙂
    The first ones are always late

    LikeLike


  877. on May 13, 2009 at 7:25 pm omw

    poor girl. Been there! Our oldest was ten days late.

    (adding a new stretch mark with each passing day, I might add, Son!)

    LikeLike


  878. on May 13, 2009 at 7:25 pm doug1

    anony–

    a few men handicapped in speaking with their own wives , you are ready to see a “collective good”?

    I repeat. If the 10% figure for misattributed fatherhood births in the Anglosphere is correct, that probably means something like 20-25% of wives giving birth have reason to worry.

    After all, most cheating wives are also having sex with their husbands, so as not to out themselves.

    That’s not “a few”.

    Such is the massive sluttiness of the feminist empowered Western woman, freed from the patriarch under which Western society became knowledgeable, militarily unbeatable, technically proficient, rich, and liberal.

    To much of a good thing is a bad thing. I.e. feminism and leftism generally.

    Roll it back.

    Part way, not all the way.

    Balance.

    LikeLike


  879. on May 13, 2009 at 7:25 pm xsplat

    Bhetti

    Such fragile creatures we are, so empowered and yet so delicate!

    Look at me! Look at me! I’m drowning!

    I’m throwing a fit! Notice!

    Damn, no one takes me seriously.

    It’s as if they see through my ploys.

    LikeLike


  880. on May 13, 2009 at 7:27 pm Rum

    Anony

    Try again? How about your “pathetic whinning” will have no place in the bright new day of genetic based medicine..

    LikeLike


  881. on May 13, 2009 at 7:27 pm Bhetti

    anony:
    — privacy: the genetic material of your child is your right to know as a parent. A man has the right to decide as much as a woman, and she can keep her DNA sample to herself if she wants ‘privacy’.
    — self-determination: There is a point where we cannot be allowed to do what we want, and that is when we hurt badly someone other than ourselves.
    — presumption of innocence: Shall I globally presume all those who have charges brought against them in any crime are innocent, and not bother looking at solid evidence to confirm? Shall I globally presume all those who have not brought charges against them are innocent, and not bother looking at solid evidence to confirm? My friend’s insurance premium went up based on the fact that they were tested for HIV (regardless of the result, which is negative) and I am definitely against the assumption that being tested means you are guilty. I’ve never had sex or gone near a needle or been exposed to my knowledge in any way to HIV but I have been tested. I am not against this. It is part of my collective good duty to ensure all medical students get tested before they do work that involves possibly transferring it and hurting people. I’m not going to protest this and I didn’t feel violated, or presumed guilty.

    What do you mean by ‘what will you stand up for? anything?’. Are you saying that believing in collective good in any way makes me susceptible to tagging along to the nearest banner without discrimination? If so, let’s just ignore that.

    LikeLike


  882. on May 13, 2009 at 7:28 pm anony

    @nova,
    Yes, we’ve addresesed the potential benefits/costs/consequences . To me MPT is a loser. Private PT is the better option. I’ll leave it at that.
    Thanks.

    LikeLike


  883. on May 13, 2009 at 7:28 pm doug1

    PA

    PA

    Any day now 🙂
    The first ones are always late

    Good for you and yours.

    When it happens, let us know!

    Well, I fully realize we won’t be way up in those priorities, but before TOO long. ‘kay?

    LikeLike


  884. on May 13, 2009 at 7:31 pm schoolboy

    I wonder if Roissy is going to hand out a prize for being the 1,000 commenter on a single post.

    LikeLike


  885. on May 13, 2009 at 7:32 pm PA

    Doug, thanks dude!
    I got the week off, and newborns mostly sleep, so it could mean lots of free time to chill out on this blog go to the gym and keep up with work remotely.

    LikeLike


  886. on May 13, 2009 at 7:34 pm Dave from Hawaii

    doug –

    Dave in Hawaii’s newly found, mid marriage, alpha game may be a successful example. It’s almost as if he became a different man for his wife though.

    Nah…it was more like I became a different man after marriage by unknowingly and ignorantly falling into Beta behavior. I simply found awareness by reading up on Game, and re-attached my balls, straightened my spine and started acting like the man she fell in love with.

    *Doing my part to help this thread reach 900.

    LikeLike


  887. on May 13, 2009 at 7:41 pm Bhetti

    @anony: Your argument for private PT: cowards deserve not to know but untrusting dudes don’t regardless of the disadvantages gig has outlined of treating this on an individual basis. People will disagree about this, out of sympathy for the kicked puppies. You can leave it at that.

    LikeLike


  888. on May 13, 2009 at 7:52 pm gig

    omv

    “honey, let’s check if the kid is really mine” is probably the worst thing a man can say to a woman except “I want a divorce”. It is not a matter of talking, because it should have been done before, much before.

    if it comes to PPT, the guy is fucked anyway. For the woman, it is the most whorish ones that have the least to lose

    LikeLike


  889. on May 13, 2009 at 8:22 pm 87

    Bhetti,

    Oh, state and father of my child, how you wound me with your brutal accusations! I will surely cry myself to sleep every night for 10 years because a woman as having any strength is a myth.

    This was sexy.

    Damn.

    LikeLike


  890. on May 13, 2009 at 8:35 pm Bhetti

    Rum: Expect ethical workshops: ‘Don’t Reveal Cuckoldry To Family When Incidental Finding 101’.

    I say ethics. Don’t do it, or lose your medical license, more like it.

    LikeLike


  891. on May 13, 2009 at 8:37 pm doug1

    87

    The sex volcano that is Bhetti is truly awesome.

    LikeLike


  892. on May 13, 2009 at 8:45 pm Bhetti

    Rum: Oh God, I’m imagining the verbal gymnastics even now.

    Cuckold: ‘Why does he have this condition? I read it up on the internet, it says it is dominantly inherited and none of us have it.’ Subtext: she loves me.

    Woman: ‘Yes, doc, why is that?’ Subtext: you better not ruin this, we have a good thing going.

    You: ‘An explanation could possibly be that this is a rarer form.’ Subtext: I don’t think saving anybody’s life is going to save me from the fires of hell. I have sold my soul.

    LikeLike


  893. on May 13, 2009 at 8:47 pm Bhetti

    87/doug:
    Oh no, it’s spreading. Quick, I need to say something that will turn you guys off.

    The pictures are fake. I’m a five. Max. Hirsutism. Severe acne. Obesity. Er, your mother.

    Sufficient?

    LikeLike


  894. on May 13, 2009 at 8:54 pm Bhetti

    No? Chandler’s ankles, maybe?

    LikeLike


  895. on May 13, 2009 at 9:20 pm Mr.M

    Dave from Hawaii –

    I’m curious, was it difficult to implement game/alpha behavior in a marriage? Must have come with some resistance, no? Or at least a little shock value on the part of your wife.

    LikeLike


  896. on May 13, 2009 at 9:22 pm Rum

    Bhetti

    In what possible way is it sensible to speak of finding out that “The father is not who we assumed”, an incidental matter? I mean, when the subject is medical care and the relationship to ones genes?
    For a start, it means that identifying the real bio-dad should be undertaken, that is, if anyone is serious about studying genetic risks.

    LikeLike


  897. on May 13, 2009 at 9:23 pm Puma

    I wonder if the probable-cuckold who wrote the letter to Hax ever finds out about Roissy’s article and this thread.

    LikeLike


  898. on May 13, 2009 at 9:25 pm David Alexander

    You do realise the ‘easier’ part is what hurts the most about you and why I project previous pain on you.

    Yes, but I really couldn’t be bothered. It’s much easier to let her prattle on than start an argument on her idiotic diarrhea of the mouth statements. This isn’t some way to be inferior, but it’s just an easier way of living.

    Roissy readers function without trust– a strange and alien concept to them.

    The “trust, but verify” meme comes across as beta rationalization. They should just simply admit that they don’t trust her.

    The presumption of guilt, the humiliation are the problems.

    The best analogy would be the idea that due to higher crime rates in the black community, a DNA bank of black men should be kept to match DNA found in crime scenes. While most black men would have nothing to fear since most are not criminals, the test implies that all men are potential criminals. Thus, in theory, for some women, while they are not going to cuckold their husbands, they would feel insulted for being told that they could be potential cheaters.

    I got the week off, and newborns mostly sleep, so it could mean lots of free time to chill out on this blog go to the gym and keep up with work remotely.

    Lots of time to jerk off too. 🙂

    LikeLike


  899. on May 13, 2009 at 9:28 pm Gunslingergregi

    yeeeee haaaaaaaa

    LikeLike


  900. on May 13, 2009 at 9:30 pm Gunslingergregi

    This is why guys who don’t want to be slaves need to save their own money to be prepared for any contingincy. You prepare for any event by having loot. It is the way it is.

    LikeLike


  901. on May 13, 2009 at 9:32 pm Gunslingergregi

    Do not fight the game that beats all facets of all games. Money in your accounts not only with your woman.

    LikeLike


  902. on May 13, 2009 at 9:34 pm Gunslingergregi

    Then you can be free even when they demand a percentage instead of being a slave. Freeeeeeddddooooommmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!

    LikeLike


  903. on May 13, 2009 at 9:34 pm Rain And

    roissy:: Cuckoldry is serious business because it is the female form of rape.

    tood:: I don’t care what anyone says, Cuckolding IS rape, done to men.

    Dave from Hawaii:: cuckoldry (it really is male rape

    Obsidian:: the very nature of Cuckoldry is indeed a form of rape, if, we accept that rape is the violation of another’s body on sexual grounds.

    This is a ridiculously long thread, so perhaps this point has been made somewhere, but the definition of rape is sex taken by force or threat of force, not sex obtained by deception.

    We don’t legally or emotionally recognize sex obtained by deception as “rape,” and any loony feminist that told me it WAS “rape” or “a form of rape” would get the “nigga please” look.

    If lying to men about paternity to get his reproductive investment is cuckoldry, the male form of cuckoldry is actually impregnating a woman after you lied about your social status or level of commitment in order to get sexual compliance.

    A man who tells a women that he is going to marry her, and ditches her after she gets pregnant is the male cuckold. He is a bad man, worthy of a good ass-kicking, but he isn’t a “rapist”. And neither is the female cuckold.

    LikeLike


  904. on May 13, 2009 at 9:39 pm novaseeker

    Rum —

    In what possible way is it sensible to speak of finding out that “The father is not who we assumed”, an incidental matter? I mean, when the subject is medical care and the relationship to ones genes?
    For a start, it means that identifying the real bio-dad should be undertaken, that is, if anyone is serious about studying genetic risks.

    I think that Bhetti is pretty close on this one, given her own background. Articles I have read about this also suggest that the emerging predominant view among medical professionals is that when false paternity is discovered in DNA scans made for purposes other than Daddy Testing, the false paternity should *not* be disclosed to the father or the child, but private discussions may be had with the mother (who presumably already knows who the father is) about alternative testing arrangements or something like that. Virtually no-one is comfortable with disclosing that information to the father outside the context of a specific paternity test.

    Which again leads us back down the path to routine paternity testing done at birth.

    LikeLike


  905. on May 13, 2009 at 9:57 pm Dave from Hawaii

    I’m curious, was it difficult to implement game/alpha behavior in a marriage? Must have come with some resistance, no? Or at least a little shock value on the part of your wife.

    No, not at all. It was incremental on my part. In fact, my very first attempt at anything was using cocky/funny humor when confronted by a “shit test.”

    I was skeptical it would work, but it literally broke the destructive pattern I had been stuck in for years…and at that EXACT moment, I knew I had been going about things the wrong way for a long, long time.

    We used to fight and argue all the time, with me pleading with her to just “stop being angry…why do we have to argue all the time?” This could turn into a passive/aggressive argument/fight that could go on for DAYS. Silent treatment, or she’d go sleep in a different room, etc.

    It was only later that I realized that in fact it was because I was repulsing her with such Beta supplications. I was killing her attraction for me…THAT is why we had to argue all the time…and why she would reluctantly or begrudgingly consent to sex…if at all.

    The more I started applying “game” the better our relationship became. I never realized it til later, but after a visit with her family, I saw it quite clearly that my Father-in-law and her had a similar relationship…he was what you’d call a “natural” player. The more I “negged” her and teased her, the more she would liven up and play along – just like her father and her would do all the time (and just like my Father-in-Law STILL does to my Mother-in-Law…40 years of marriage and counting).

    As for “asshole” game…I found that actually works quite well when I’m justifiably angry. Where I used to squelch any and all expressions of anger, I no longer feel afraid of letting her know I was upset with her for whatever reason. I spent years thinking if I got angry and yelled, it would drive her away. I couldn’t have been more wrong. This is not to say I insult my wife with obscenities, but I was no longer afraid to call it like I see it.

    I also stopped apologizing to her. That’s not to say, if I do something in which I can honestly say she deserved one, I’d give it…but only once. I used to BEG for forgiveness and beg her not to be angry with me anymore…and the more I did that, the angrier she’d get. I didn’t understand that I was basically making her angrier because I was acting like an SWPL douche bag.

    In short, I stopped living in FEAR of how my wife might act or react to me. I had gotten to the point where I’d have a default thought “this might make the wife mad!”

    It was only a short time after I started doing this, before she starting acting attracted to me again. Where I used to beg her for action, she would now literally jump me.

    To this day, I don’t think she consciously realizes what exactly was going on.

    She only refers to the past when talking to others as “We used to have so much problems…but we’re doing great now! We never fight anymore!” She doesn’t have a conscious awareness of what “changed.” But I certainly do.

    It’s funny, but the more successful I became at interacting my wife and “gaming” her over and over again, the less I have to even think about it.

    LikeLike


  906. on May 13, 2009 at 10:23 pm PA

    A photo that will make Peter weep:

    (NSFW)

    LikeLike


  907. on May 13, 2009 at 10:30 pm M

    Dave from Hawaii,

    Why did you feel the need to change your behavior to begin with? Why even tolerate such a situation? It wasn’t you that had the problem. You were treating her nicely and trying to resolve arguments with minimal drama. In response, you got shit testing, the silent treatment, the seperate bedrooms. Why not just get out? Just get the hell out. How do you look at her knowing you can’t be yourself, that you have to act out a role in order to be treated with respect like a marriage partner should. The fact that Game caused such a change in her would even turn me off even more. Perhaps it was the state sanctioned extortion from divorce that forced you to adopt this strategy.

    For any guy reading this. The problems in marriage can be avoided by not signing the contract and not having kids. Enjoy the companionship, enjoy the sex. With sufficient game, looks or money you’ll have a happy, stress free drama free life when it comes to women. Follow these rules:

    1. Don’t sign a marriage contract. Prenups don’t always hold up in court.
    2. Don’t move them in to your place. This way, you won’t be expected to pay their bills. Breakups will also be logistically easier.
    3. Always wear a condom no matter what they tell you about any birth control they’re using. Ideally, get a vasectomy.
    4. The second the nagging starts, the critiquing, trying to control you, withholding sex, demanding money, getting fat etc. it’s time to go. No working things out, no arguing. Find another woman and start over.

    Relationships should be fun. If they’re not fun, you’re with the wrong person.

    LikeLike


  908. on May 13, 2009 at 10:32 pm Rum

    Rain And

    A more precise analogy would be a man tricking a woman into sterilization surgery (under the guise of being committed to her) while he sired children with another woman.
    Yes, that is a better fit, by far.
    Novaseeker
    I do not think anyone has proposed telling the cuckold the answer to a question he has not asked. But that by itself does not make wrongly understood paternity into being “an incidental finding”.

    LikeLike


  909. on May 13, 2009 at 10:48 pm Celtic

    It’s not a good argument to call MPT a “presumption of guilt”. Right now, there is already a presumption of liability, a presumption of liability that a guy has to pay out for 18 years if there is a child born. This would just require that it be proven before such a presumption be made.

    If we’re considered about privacy, there should be a paternity test required before child support can be ordered. We shouldn’t presume that liability without evidence.

    It’s also a bad argument to suggest that betas deserve the fate of being cuckolded for not having the nerve to get a paternity test done. Growing up in this country, we are taught that women are sugar and spice and everything nice. Feminism is deeply entrenched in this society and in our educational system; most men think women are good natured at heart and would not do something like cuckolding. Most men particularly would think that *THEIR* wife would never do something like cheat on them.

    Being forced to pay for 18 years for another man’s kid is a terrible injustice. Not coming across this blog isn’t a good reason for someone to face that. Betas shouldn’t be punished for trusting their wife- trust between married people is something that should be encouraged!

    Unfortunately, MPT is going to happen because it will be opposed by a coalition of:

    -Women, who have the impulse to cuckold hardwided into them genetically. Not every woman is going to succeed in getting an alpha to commit to them, so the next best thing is to get that alpha sperm and get someone else to help raise the kid.

    -Opportunistic Alphas like xspalt who don’t care about bad things happening to betas

    -SWPL feminist beta losers who will take the feminist position as a gut reaction, trading their soul away for the slim hope of getting a piece of ass in return

    LikeLike


  910. on May 13, 2009 at 10:52 pm novaseeker

    Rum —

    I do not think anyone has proposed telling the cuckold the answer to a question he has not asked. But that by itself does not make wrongly understood paternity into being “an incidental finding”.

    This I agree with. In other words, if it is found, as a result of a screen for a genetically inherited disease, *and* the “father” asks about the oddity of the result … at *that* point I don’t see how it is ethical to lie about the result. Lying is lying.

    LikeLike


  911. on May 13, 2009 at 10:55 pm GNPs are for Apes

    Opportunistic Alphas like xspalt

    Who said xsplat is alpha? He is not. He is an enviro-lefty who thinks that having children is socially irresponsible – his actual words.

    LikeLike


  912. on May 13, 2009 at 10:56 pm Chuck

    PA:

    fuck peter, that made *me* weep….time to make a deposit in the spank bank

    LikeLike


  913. on May 13, 2009 at 10:59 pm Dave from Hawaii

    Why did you feel the need to change your behavior to begin with? Why even tolerate such a situation? It wasn’t you that had the problem. You were treating her nicely and trying to resolve arguments with minimal drama.

    Because I realized that I had indeed relinquished my masculinity, and she was resenting me for it. Thank god for it too. I wasn’t “treating her nicely.”

    In response, you got shit testing, the silent treatment, the seperate bedrooms. Why not just get out? Just get the hell out. How do you look at her knowing you can’t be yourself, that you have to act out a role in order to be treated with respect like a marriage partner should. The fact that Game caused such a change in her would even turn me off even more. Perhaps it was the state sanctioned extortion from divorce that forced you to adopt this strategy.

    Actually, I think you got it all backwards. I was trying to be a “nice guy” to try to get her to behave in a way I wanted her to. In retrospect, I wasn’t treating her nicely…I was patronizing her…like a little kid saying or doing things they don’t really want to…just so they can get something from their parents. I look back on how I used to be nice and I shudder with a visceral contempt for myself.

    No, I learned that I had changed during my marriage. When we were younger, I was a take charge, take no shit guy. I lead, and she followed, and we were happy.

    Game simply opened my eyes to how much I had changed from the independent, confident bachelor that initially attracted my wife into the Beta schlub that repulsed her.

    I take full responsibility for my own failure to be a Man. The Man she fell in love with.

    Hey M, I’ve had this argument with plenty of guys like yourself.

    You want to take the easy way out. Fine. I don’t fault you for that. Given the realities of today’s system, I think a position like yours is perfectly understandable and reasonable.

    But I will tell you this: I love my wife. She is a quality woman. She comes from a solid family, a family that has accepted me completely as one of there own. I get along better with my in-laws than I do with my own family. Oh, and as I’ve said, things between us are better now than they ever were…even when we were dating in our youth.

    Now that I’ve awoken to the realities of just what behaviors inspire or turn off a woman’s attractions, I no longer am “afraid” of having her leave me.

    If she didn’t leave me when I was at my most contemptible, Beta-state…I’m pretty damn sure she’s not going to leave me now that I regularly seduce her and she enthusiastically loves me in return.

    Oh did I forget to mention my wife is still hot? She’s part Filipino, and like the rest of her family, she’s aging really really well. At 34, she still gets carded to buy booze or to get into a club all the time.

    I’m almost 100% I’m going to go home tonight and bang the living shit out of her. There is such a thing as happy marriage….and I only say that ’cause I’m living it. Where it not for Game, I’d be just another bitter, divorced dude echoing your sentiments all the way.

    LikeLike


  914. on May 13, 2009 at 11:02 pm novaseeker

    Celtic —

    It’s also a bad argument to suggest that betas deserve the fate of being cuckolded for not having the nerve to get a paternity test done. Growing up in this country, we are taught that women are sugar and spice and everything nice. Feminism is deeply entrenched in this society and in our educational system; most men think women are good natured at heart and would not do something like cuckolding. Most men particularly would think that *THEIR* wife would never do something like cheat on them.

    Indeed. I think the notion that it is in any way neutral for a man to routinely approach his wife when she is pregnant and say “Honey, I love you, but you know, I really want to get a paternity test when the child is born…” — that is basically accusing her of committing adultery. To suggest that men should routinely do this with each pregnancy is insane. And to suggest that men who do not want to approach their pregnant wives like this are “weak” or “handicapped” is insulting, shaming language — whether coming from people like anony or alpha supremacists like xsplat.

    Being forced to pay for 18 years for another man’s kid is a terrible injustice. Not coming across this blog isn’t a good reason for someone to face that.

    It’s not mostly the money. It’s being tricked into bonding and parentally investing (time, love, energy) into offspring of another man. That is horrific, it is genetic suicide for men. This is the main male civil rights issue — it goes to the core of our existence.

    Unfortunately, MPT is going to happen because it will be opposed by a coalition of:

    -Women, who have the impulse to cuckold hardwided into them genetically. Not every woman is going to succeed in getting an alpha to commit to them, so the next best thing is to get that alpha sperm and get someone else to help raise the kid.

    -Opportunistic Alphas like xspalt who don’t care about bad things happening to betas

    -SWPL feminist beta losers who will take the feminist position as a gut reaction, trading their soul away for the slim hope of getting a piece of ass in return

    I actually think this one will happen. There are already initiatives for it in several states. And even alphas don’t want to be cuckolded. This has an even chance of being passed in many states, I think. It will be a fight, but the case on this one is easier to make than on family law, for example, I think.

    LikeLike


  915. on May 13, 2009 at 11:03 pm Comment_Whatever

    Whiskey:

    Cheating is distressing, the only appropriate response is to remove one’s self from any such woman as quickly as possible and bang as many girls as possible. Anything else is acting like a woman with lots of testosterone.

    End Whiskey

    By limiting the male response to ‘doing nothing’, Whiskey is effectively supporting cuckolding women. At least the men who supported a cheating woman in the letters thread drew a line somewhere. Do you, Whiskey, HAVE boundaries that will provoke a response?

    Rain and:

    This is a ridiculously long thread, so perhaps this point has been made somewhere, but the definition of rape is sex taken by force or threat of force, not sex obtained by deception.

    We don’t legally or emotionally recognize sex obtained by deception as “rape,” and any loony feminist that told me it WAS “rape” or “a form of rape” would get the “nigga please” look.

    If lying to men about paternity to get his reproductive investment is cuckoldry, the male form of cuckoldry is actually impregnating a woman after you lied about your social status or level of commitment in order to get sexual compliance.

    A man who tells a women that he is going to marry her, and ditches her after she gets pregnant is the male cuckold. He is a bad man, worthy of a good ass-kicking, but he isn’t a “rapist”. And neither is the female cuckold.

    End Rain and

    When she demands child support for the child from the not-father, she does so with the threat of violence from the state.

    And that, Rain, IS MALE RAPE. But you do have a point that lying about it doesn’t quite rise to the level of rape.

    Given the nearly disinterested way you deal with extremely serious crimes, I kind of wonder, Rain and, if you have ever had anything really bad happen to you.

    Because having your life destroyed isn’t very funny in real life.

    And this is life-destroying stuff we are talking about. It is very serious.

    LikeLike


  916. on May 13, 2009 at 11:04 pm Tood

    I want to come back to the cuckolding post, as most of the females here avoided answering the question.

    Is it wrong for a married woman to have a child with another man, and still trick her husband into think it is his, and draw financial support from the duped man?

    The answers so far :

    Bhetti said it is wrong.

    Marcus Aureliette said it is wrong.

    I think Nicole can be trusted to say it is wrong.

    Did anyone else answer? I didn’t see it. Let me know if an answer was missed.

    Answers still needed from :

    Chic Noir (unclear position so far)

    Sara I

    blue

    kim

    anony

    Who else is a woman here?

    The silence is deafening. I am not going to let up on cornering them to answer the question.

    LikeLike


  917. on May 13, 2009 at 11:16 pm novaseeker

    Tood —

    Anony thinks it is wrong, but thinks it should be up to the man to discover the infidelity himself and confront, or to get a private test, if he is suspicious. This doesn’t cover the cases where the woman is really good at deceit, of course. But I think she thinks these are a small number of cases, and doesn’t justify MPT.

    Just stating what I think her position is. I disagree with her, as you can see from the exchanges above.

    LikeLike


  918. on May 13, 2009 at 11:24 pm novaseeker

    This is a ridiculously long thread, so perhaps this point has been made somewhere, but the definition of rape is sex taken by force or threat of force, not sex obtained by deception.

    We don’t legally or emotionally recognize sex obtained by deception as “rape,” and any loony feminist that told me it WAS “rape” or “a form of rape” would get the “nigga please” look.

    If lying to men about paternity to get his reproductive investment is cuckoldry, the male form of cuckoldry is actually impregnating a woman after you lied about your social status or level of commitment in order to get sexual compliance.

    A man who tells a women that he is going to marry her, and ditches her after she gets pregnant is the male cuckold. He is a bad man, worthy of a good ass-kicking, but he isn’t a “rapist”. And neither is the female cuckold.

    Actually it’s closer to rape than you think.

    Paternity fraud is the non-violent rape of a man.

    The core existential horror of rape for women, beyond the horrible violence, is the fact that it takes away from them their choice of mating partner. In times prior to the present, women often got pregnant from rape and the babies ended up being born. This was a horrible violation for women, because it’s pretty much what Roissy describes: a baby is growing inside her where the right of her to choose her sex mate (and DNA contributor) was taken away from her against her will.

    Cuckoldry does this to men in a non-violent way. The “violence” of rape is replaced by the “deceit” of cuckoldry, and the result is the same: taking away a man’s right to choose whose children he will invest in and help raise, just as rape takes away (or did before widely available abortion) a woman’s right to choose whose DNA will be in her children.

    Both rape and paternity fraud are genetic crimes of the highest order — one imposes a set of DNA on a woman against her will, and the other makes men invest in children who do not have their DNA without their knowledge and consent. Both are serious, existential, genetic violations. In one the means of execution is violence, and in the other it is deceit, but on the genetic/DNA level, these are equivalent crimes.

    LikeLike


  919. on May 14, 2009 at 12:12 am Chuck

    novaseeker:

    “non-violent rape”

    that oxymoron invalidates your whole argument.

    paternity fraud = non-violent rape of men, but non-violent rape is an undefined term.

    “non-violent rape” is not rape therefore “male rape” is not rape.

    why are you guys so attached to the term “rape” anyway? calling it thievery or robbery gets the point across just as well.

    my thought is that you throw the term “rape” around in the same way that feminists throw it around: to stoke the flames.

    LikeLike


  920. on May 14, 2009 at 12:51 am novaseeker

    No, Chuck.

    I concede that violence matters. Violent raps is a more serious offense than paternity fraud. I agree.

    But on the genetic level, it’s the same crime.

    Go on — disprove that on the genetic level rape is worse than paternity fraud.

    LikeLike


  921. on May 14, 2009 at 1:00 am Rain And

    Yeah, re-defining rape to mean whatever you want it to is a bullshit feminist tactic. It’s disappointing to see men’s rights ideologues try to pull the same shit.

    “A more precise analogy would be a man tricking a woman into sterilization surgery (under the guise of being committed to her) while he sired children with another woman.”

    Which is not “rape”. The genders in this odd scenario are completely interchangeable, so its closest analogy is itself with the genders reversed.

    “When she demands child support for the child from the not-father, she does so with the threat of violence from the state.”

    Such laws are unjust bullshit, but A) that is the government “raping” you, and B) it isn’t “rape” anymore than the government looting you for any other purpose is “rape”. If taking money from a man is “rape,” then all forms of theft and taxation against a man need to be called “rape”. You can’t pretend a man’s wallet is his vagina in one context, and not in every other context. It’s the same damn wallet in every context.

    “Given the nearly disinterested way you deal with extremely serious crimes, I kind of wonder, Rain and, if you have ever had anything really bad happen to you.”

    This is an emotional non-sequitur. Just because I refuse to label car-theft as “genocide” doesn’t mean I don’t think car theft is a serious crime.

    Cuckoldry is a serious moral violation, but so is abandoning the woman you knocked-up under pretense of commitment.

    That doesn’t mean either behavior should be called “rape” or “genocide” just because these are the words that carry the most emotional punch. It doesn’t even mean they should be illegal. They shouldn’t be illegal!

    If you want society to feel that cuckoldry is as wrong as rape, then fight the up-hill battle to convince them of this, and the word ‘cuckoldry’ will become just as powerful. Don’t try to cheat by piggy-backing on words that describe something different but carry heavier rhetorical ammo. It’s dishonest, ideological, and doesn’t work.

    LikeLike


  922. on May 14, 2009 at 1:09 am novaseeker

    Society always considered cuckoldry a huge crime. Women were shunned, exiled from their families, and summarily dismissed if discovered. Historically, cuckolding was a big deal for men and women alike.

    Feminism changed that by legitimizing female sexual license. And at the same time expanding rape law to cover things that were never considered rape.

    So ultimately, you’re asking men to fight to restore the status quo about cuckoldry before the revolution. It’s a nice rhetorical tactic, but in substance it’s bullshit.

    Rape and paternity fraud are identical crimes on the genetic level, which is the most fundamental level for our species, as any other.

    LikeLike


  923. on May 14, 2009 at 1:42 am Rain And

    “Rape and paternity fraud are identical crimes on the genetic level, which is the most fundamental level for our species, as any other.”

    There are no crimes “at the genetic level”. Genes don’t have special rights, and don’t take anyone to court, except indirectly through higher order motivations and emotions.

    Tricking a man into paying for your child for 18 years may prevent him from reproducing, but so would convincing him to become a Catholic priest, or convincing him not to have children so he can sleep around with women his whole life. The exact lifestyle roissy promotes. If roissy converts a man to the child-free playboy lifestyle, is roissy now a “rapist” because he committed the same “crime” “at the genetic level”?

    What matters for morals and laws isn’t what happens “at the genetic level,” but what happen at the cognitive level.

    At the cognitive level, sexual violence and sexual deception are two different things, with different legal consequences.

    That doesn’t mean that sexual deception isn’t often just as, or even more, painful than sexual violence.

    LikeLike


  924. on May 14, 2009 at 1:44 am Billare

    There is a ton of evidence that women have evolved to tell men that their offspring looks like them, even when others objectively judge that it is not so, according to Buss who is an evolutionary psychologist.

    LikeLike


  925. on May 14, 2009 at 1:48 am Rum

    A conviction of actual rape will get a man about 30 years in a skanky prison nowadays. In the 2nd WW British or American Soldiers could expect the death penalty for raping anyone, in any country. Dozens of these harsh sentences were carried out.
    Compare that to the horror of getting a child support check every month from a guy who acts kinda angry and suspicious. The emotional trauma the woman feels while ripping-off the guy is pretty serious, after all. She should get gov.paid councilling for the stress she feels from doing her crime.

    LikeLike


  926. on May 14, 2009 at 1:51 am novaseeker

    Sure there are crimes at the genetic level. Everything in our species is based in our genetic motives. Rape and paternity fraud are equal on that level.

    Your version of morals and laws leaves men high and dry and totally exposed to female treachery, with no recourse for cuckoldry. After all, we are mules to supply women with not only financial investment in their children (the lesser issue), but love, time, focus and all of the rest .. which we are again here to provide to women at their whim because we are women’s mules, right?

    No morals as this applies to men. All is well. It’s not rape, it’s just about checks, and men are walking checks. Men have no rights, only obligations.

    The pain? Take some antidepressants and man up.

    =========

    We are going to win this one. So it’s a nice debate, but this is one we are going to win.

    LikeLike


  927. on May 14, 2009 at 2:58 am Welmer

    Funny, things with me weren’t quite what you’d expect. My kids are MINE, for sure. My daughter is so much like me that I know her mother won’t be able to handle her.

    When things weren’t working out with my wife and I’d started to move on so I could have a real life (I wasn’t considering infidelity, just freedom), she found herself a total beta (online, of course) who said he wanted to raise my kids. Needless to say, I have not been very accommodating about this arrangement.

    I’ve had a SWAT team called on me, automatic weapons and all, been ordered to attend anger management classes and have been through three separate investigations (none of which found anything criminal).

    Essentially, it took the full power of the state, which is quite considerable, to leverage me into accepting my status as minority custodial parent — and the jury’s still out.

    I’m actually enjoying my anger management classes. I got to act out a situation today with the teacher, and he told me to let him have it. I did, and he started sweating in front of the class. But he’s a good guy, his heart’s in the right place, and he has some kind of social kung fu that allows him to keep his cool; I think it’s actually called “morality” — an alien concept to your typical female. He’s helped me by suggesting I take a philosophical approach to things and always consider the results of each move on the board. Guys really do understand the true situation, and things are rumbling below.

    BTW, I am very impressed with novaseeker’s blog. This guy is very good at maintaining productivity as well as quality of content. He also has a maturity and perspective in his analysis that I admire. Younger men would do well to read his blog.

    LikeLike


  928. on May 14, 2009 at 3:02 am Chuck

    “No, Chuck.

    I concede that violence matters. Violent raps is a more serious offense than paternity fraud. I agree.

    But on the genetic level, it’s the same crime.

    Go on — disprove that on the genetic level rape is worse than paternity fraud.”

    Look, I get the point you’re trying to make…I just think it’s a stupid analogy given that there are better legal terms for what is going on in paternity fraud…”fraud” for one.

    for the sake of getting your point across (roissy too) you guys use the inflammatory word “rape”. this makes you no different than hated feminists who claim every woman is raped when she has sex while drunk…hell, there are some feminists who claim rape happens everytime intercourse does, consented to or not just because of the imbalance of physical power between man and woman…

    You can’t rape genes. You can coerce genes from a man’s body under false pretenses, thus making it “fraud” or “theft”, but “rape”, no.

    I mean really, you guys can use “male rape” as a literary device and all, that’s fine, but you also need to realize that its a bad analogy.

    LikeLike


  929. on May 14, 2009 at 3:10 am Welmer

    Rain And

    Yeah, re-defining rape to mean whatever you want it to is a bullshit feminist tactic. It’s disappointing to see men’s rights ideologues try to pull the same shit.

    If not for the genetic aspect, how is rape any different from simple assault? If cuckoldry is OK, then why is rape more serious than forcing a woman to give up her purse or jewelry?

    Novaseeker is absolutely correct on this one.

    What matters for morals and laws isn’t what happens “at the genetic level,” but what happen at the cognitive level.

    At the cognitive level, sexual violence and sexual deception are two different things, with different legal consequences.

    That doesn’t mean that sexual deception isn’t often just as, or even more, painful than sexual violence.

    Can you explain logically the total contradiction you have introduced here, or are you actually blind to it?

    I swear, women are incapable of thought. All they hear is their vagina, and it is very difficult for us men to make sense of those noises.

    LikeLike


  930. on May 14, 2009 at 3:10 am novaseeker

    Welmer, man, the best post I have ever read on a blog was yours and it is this one: http://www.welmer.org/2008/04/30/mens-liberation/

    Best blog evah! Seriously, men, read it, meditate on it and internalize it. And embrace your freedom.

    Welmer, it sucks what the system puts us through. We have only one life here, and the fembots want to make it as hard as possible because we are among the generations of men they have available.

    We will soon have respite. In space. In reproductive techs. Men and women are drifting further apart, and drifting to more of a “use” relationship, along the lines that women would expect based on feminist norms.

    Anyway, we are the vanguard, Wilmer. Take heart. We are the vanguard. We’ll win out in the end .. it may be a long end, beyond our deaths, but we are men, and this is what we do.

    See you at your blog! N

    LikeLike


  931. on May 14, 2009 at 3:11 am Rain And

    Sure there are crimes at the genetic level. Everything in our species is based in our genetic motives. Rape and paternity fraud are equal on that level.

    Look, I already addressed why this is illogical in my comment. Either engage the argument with logic or don’t respond. Repeating yourself after I engage your comment isn’t dialogue, it’s sloganeering.

    No morals as this applies to men. All is well. It’s not rape, it’s just about checks, and men are walking checks. Men have no rights, only obligations.

    I said just the opposite! Fucking bullshit.

    If “menimists” are just as solipsistic and intellectually faggy as their female counterparts then no one will want to be associated with them but the loser dregs. I don’t know what you think you’re going to “win”, but alienating everyone, including men who probably share more than 90% of your beliefs, with this kind of dishonorable assholing won’t win you any allies or sympathy.

    LikeLike


  932. on May 14, 2009 at 3:11 am Chuck

    “Rape and paternity fraud are equal on that level. ”

    Also, Nova, rape isn’t usually conducted in order to procreate. That’s sometimes a byproduct of the act.

    Also, the reason it isn’t rape in the distorted definition you are creating….*it isn’t the cuckolded man’s child*. it’s unfortunate and despicable that the man is coerced into paying for a bastard child, but he is being defrauded out of money, not genetic material.

    his genetic material didn’t make it to the egg, or else we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

    so yes, the man is being robbed, thieved, defrauded, but when Bernie Madoff screws people out of millions of dollars, were those individuals raped??

    LikeLike


  933. on May 14, 2009 at 3:14 am Chuck

    Rain And:

    really, the argument over the definition of paternity fraud as rape is merely a masterbatory effort…i’m just big on defining terms in arguments, but i have to agree with the thrust of the idea behind what they are saying….paternity fraud is shitty and should be punished.

    are you able to agree with that for starters?

    LikeLike


  934. on May 14, 2009 at 3:20 am Chuck

    Welmer:

    “If not for the genetic aspect, how is rape any different from simple assault?”

    because not every rape has a genetic aspect…most don’t, in fact.

    when women are raped, the accused aren’t punished more (at least systematically) if the woman has a child from the rape.

    i mean, at first, i could see your point that it is an assault and the fact that it violates an area that is very sacred to a woman, because of its reproductive possibilities, gives it greater weight in the eyes of the court and society, but if you rape a woman in the ass you’ll get tossed in jail for just as long. perhaps rape charges became more severe than simple assault charges because of the conception aspect, but it has evolved to be a punishment for the gross abuse of a person’s body against their will.

    LikeLike


  935. on May 14, 2009 at 3:21 am Rain And

    “really, the argument over the definition of paternity fraud as rape is merely a masterbatory effort…i’m just big on defining terms in arguments”

    I think you and I are on a similar page here.

    In so far as men are under legal obligations to make child support payments, I think cuckolds should be under legal obligation to reimburse ill-gotten child support payments plus punitive damages.

    LikeLike


  936. on May 14, 2009 at 3:22 am Chuck

    just to clarify, *cuckold* is the term for the men that are getting screwed over….evil devil-wench is the term for the women who do the screwing over…

    LikeLike


  937. on May 14, 2009 at 3:23 am novaseeker

    Also, Nova, rape isn’t usually conducted in order to procreate. That’s sometimes a byproduct of the act.

    Also, the reason it isn’t rape in the distorted definition you are creating….*it isn’t the cuckolded man’s child*. it’s unfortunate and despicable that the man is coerced into paying for a bastard child, but he is being defrauded out of money, not genetic material.

    It is NOT about money. It is about a man being forced against his will to invest parentally in children that are not his own. Parental investment is time, love, energy, interest. It is not about money. Honestly, Chuck, given your own background it is almost forgivable that you equate male parental investment with money. I guess that’s par for the course with feminist indoctrination. But you surely would not disagree: men should never be forced against their knowing consent to invest emotionally, time-wise, energy-wise in children that their partners deceive them into believing are their own? Merely money? You have been twisted by the current system Chuck. Sadly feminized by it, once you see paternity fraud as being about money.

    Paying? Paying? Grrr. It’s fucking obvious you have never been a father. Pfft.

    And I stand by the equivalence with rape. In each case the offended party is forced to raise a child with DNA against its will. Read Pinker and others. Rape is an adaptation to spread the rapists DNA. The fact that you do not realise this is a direct result of your not having read enough. I can supply sources on that, but seriously, it is no longer seriously disputed other than by fembots, that rape is an evolutionary adaptation for gene spreading.

    You need to read more, Chuck, before you write posts like that one.

    LikeLike


  938. on May 14, 2009 at 3:26 am Rain And

    “just to clarify, *cuckold* is the term for the men ”

    My bad! Yes, devil-bitches need to reimburse the cuckold.

    LikeLike


  939. on May 14, 2009 at 3:27 am novaseeker

    In so far as men are under legal obligations to make child support payments, I think cuckolds should be under legal obligation to reimburse ill-gotten child support payments plus punitive damages.

    Most of the opponents of DNA tests say this as well. But the reality is that this will never happen. It is much easier to advocate a neutral test at birth than to successfully advocate revocation of support and so on once a de facto relation exists.

    You people are assholes.

    You know that what you propose is both reasonable sounding yet politically impossible. And therefore useless other than for rhetorical posturing.

    LikeLike


  940. on May 14, 2009 at 3:35 am Rain And

    “It is much easier to advocate a neutral test at birth than to successfully advocate revocation of support and so on once a de facto relation exists. You people are assholes.”

    Right back at you, champ. I never expressed any sort of opposition to mandatory paternity testing, nor does it sound superficially unreasonable, nor have I even *heard* of this suggestion before today.

    But keep alienating everyone, and you’ll go far. Everybody loves an angry ideologue who insults and brands everyone.

    LikeLike


  941. on May 14, 2009 at 3:37 am Chuck

    Nova:

    i don’t have to be a father to know what emotional investment et. al. goes into raising a child. it annoys the fuck out of me when people (men or women) use that argument to nullify another person’s valid point.

    the fact that you get very bent out of shape at a characterization of all resources that go into raising a child as money tells me that you are the one who has been warped in some fashion. the use of “money” as the resource spent is really not that important in and of itself. you are throwing a value judgement on the investment of time and love thereby using the inflammatory word “rape” to describe cuckoldry. the fact that what goes into raising a child consists of more than just money does nothing to further your point that this should be called rape.

    and for the record, of course i agree that cuckoldry is horrible and should be punished. i don’t really care how it’s punished to tell you the truth, and i’ve stated this a million times. you just want to pretend i’m a feminist for some reason.

    it amazes me that you are so bent on using the word rape to describe cuckoldry. what is the investment you have in that word when theft or fraud (as paternity fraud is so aptly called) are much more suitable definitions?

    LikeLike


  942. on May 14, 2009 at 3:39 am Welmer

    Chuck

    perhaps rape charges became more severe than simple assault charges because of the conception aspect, but it has evolved to be a punishment for the gross abuse of a person’s body against their will.

    OK then. Ever gotten your ass kicked, Chuck?

    I have, because I wouldn’t give up my wallet to a gang and I broke their leader’s jaw when he said he’d take it by force.

    Do you think getting dragged to the ground against one’s will by several people, then kicked in the head and stomped on the neck for refusing to turn over one’s wallet is not a “gross abuse of a person’s body against their will?” Man, just chewing soft food hurt for weeks after that, and I had a burst blood vessel in my eye that made me look like a monster for a long time (at least I kept my cash, heh).

    The cops didn’t think it was that big of a deal, but if I’d been a sorority girl who had screamed rape after a drunken escapade at a frat party despite being physically unharmed I’m pretty sure there would have been a full investigation.

    LikeLike


  943. on May 14, 2009 at 3:39 am novaseeker

    Right back at you, champ. I never expressed any sort of opposition to mandatory paternity testing, nor does it sound superficially unreasonable, nor have I even *heard* of this suggestion before today.

    Oh? look at the many objections on this thread.

    But anyway, if you are unopposed, then you are an ally. Good stuff.

    We can surely agree to disagree on how we characterize the offense.

    LikeLike


  944. on May 14, 2009 at 3:42 am Chuck

    “It is much easier to advocate a neutral test at birth than to successfully advocate revocation of support and so on once a de facto relation exists.”

    I stated as much about 400 comments ago.

    LikeLike


  945. on May 14, 2009 at 3:49 am Welmer

    Chuck

    Nova:

    i don’t have to be a father to know what emotional investment et. al. goes into raising a child. it annoys the fuck out of me when people (men or women) use that argument to nullify another person’s valid point.

    Actually, I would say you do, unless you are really that much more sophisticated than I was before I became a father. If you haven’t raised a child, it is extremely difficult to understand what it entails.

    I have no more desire to nullify your point in this matter than NASA would desire to nullify the efforts of a high school physics student who wanted the position of senior engineer, but the thing is that experience really does count and it is perfectly fair to make judgments on that basis.

    LikeLike


  946. on May 14, 2009 at 3:50 am Chuck

    Welmer:

    yes i was beaten up once, by a gang of guys outside a club…didn’t get any hits in though…

    anyway, of course i know the cops would be more interested in protecting a woman who screamed rape…i know the gross distortion of the legal system in this country skewed in favor of women…it has arisen from the age old ideas of “protecting our women” and “chivalry”.

    perhaps you’re setting me up for some point here, but i’m discussing cases in which a woman is actually raped.

    women who scream rape falsely should be hung.

    LikeLike


  947. on May 14, 2009 at 3:50 am novaseeker

    it amazes me that you are so bent on using the word rape to describe cuckoldry. what is the investment you have in that word when theft or fraud (as paternity fraud is so aptly called) are much more suitable definitions?

    On the genetic level it is the same crime.

    I know most disagree, and it is your wont to do so. But it is the same crime genetically. Oh there are no genetic crimes. Nonsense. ALL crimes have a genetic basis — whether the act was adaptive or not in light of the social milieu. The idea that genetics have no basis in evaluting criminality is ignorant.

    You are among the punishment advocates. And then you fuck right off and abdicate any fucking reasonable sense of responsibility in terms of stating what that should be.

    Making it a felony as it should be? Hff. GL with that. Wellesely et al will fuck that to death. Make it civilly liable. LMAO.

    The reality Chuck, is that you are pitching for the enemy Fine. Makes you feel better. Makes life nicer for you. Chicks like you better. Fine.

    But the reality is that paternity fraud will never be taken seriously as long as it is “ah well. this always happened. It isn’t rape, lol. Stupid men hahah”

    Robbery? People think men deserve it. This is no avenue.

    Seriously — your views are understandable but will lead men into slavery and marginalization.

    LikeLike


  948. on May 14, 2009 at 3:54 am Obsidian

    I find it very interesting that the Women who take issue with me, such as Anony, Kim and now Rain And, do so while at the same time, completely sidestepping all of the meticulously presented arguments of mine in favor of MPT-Rain And takes one small quote from me and bundles it with the quotes of others, on the question of whether Paternity Fraud is rape or not; Kim merely asserts that advocating for MPT is tantamount to rolling back Women’s Rights (read Abortion); and Anony’s view is that no matter what the realworld merits of MPT, it would be injurious to Women on the grounds of indicting them all and humiliating them.

    None of them actually addressed the many, many points I raised in my posts. Indeed, when asked directly by me to Kim, she demurred. When I asked Anony to review my arguments and come back w/counter arguments, she has never responded. And now Rain And, from what we can gather from her statements, may consider going back through the thread to address, point for point, my arguments, to be too arduous task, given the length of said thread.

    While it must be said that a number of Women do seem to be in favor of MPT, among them Chic Noir, Liz/Marcus, Lil Girl (on the Girls/Condoms thread) and Bhetti (to date the only Woman w/significant medical training and who concured w/my and Rum’s medical arguments in favor of MPT), I must also state that I am saddened, but not surprised by the visceral reaction to the very idea of MPT on the part of most Women in this venue, and, the utter inability, and/or unwillingness to engage the matter on the basis of logic and reason. I have gone on the record that it appears that Feminists do not engage in debates often, andperhaps now we see why.

    And that is truly sad.

    I still hold out hope that those who vociferously disagree with me on my positions regarding MPT would actually take up my arguments and debate me on the basis of *that* rather to engage in other tactics. I still hold out hope. But I won’t hold my breath.

    The Obsidian

    LikeLike


  949. on May 14, 2009 at 3:55 am Chuck

    welmer:

    money, love, caring, time etc are all resources that go into raising a child. it doesn’t really matter which ones a man is defrauded into eliciting, it just matters that he is defrauded.

    nova is jumping on me for not realizing the resources and feelings that go into raising a child when, as far as the argument goes, it doesn’t really matter. just because a person loves their child with all their heart doesn’t change the level of fraud present in the situation. nova is attaching a superfluous value judgement on the weights of the importance of the factors that go into raising a kid.

    if a man didn’t love a child he thought was his but still paid money for its upbringing, his cuckoldry would have the same level of fraud. nova’s emotional argument, while important when discussing the horrors of cuckoldry, doesn’t change his argument about it being considered rape.

    LikeLike


  950. on May 14, 2009 at 4:01 am novaseeker

    Alright. Women should cuckold at will. Men over-react. Everything else is patriarchy.

    LikeLike


  951. on May 14, 2009 at 4:05 am Chuck

    Nova:

    “The reality Chuck, is that you are pitching for the enemy Fine. Makes you feel better. Makes life nicer for you. Chicks like you better. Fine.”

    Why question my intentions when you know nothing about them? I don’t talk about any of this shit, feminism, alpha, beta etc with anyone in my personal life, which is why i’m on this board a lot.

    And OK, I don’t have kids…if I did and I would have been screwed over by some shitty situation then perhaps I would have a dog in the fight to rename paternity fraud “rape”.

    Since I don’t, I’m genuinely coming at this from an academic POV. I’m seeking truth of terms, that’s all.

    As such, I notice that you are basically admitting to the use of inflammatory words like “rape” for added shock value. You’re straight from the Frank Luntz, Karl Rove school of word modification.

    But I’m not interested in using inflammatory words to get my agenda across. I’m interested in using correct words to describe these types of things.

    And as for slavery and marginalization…i’m not afraid of that. Societal woes seem to have a recursive feedback loop. I believe we are in the midst of a mild uprising against PC/ SWPL / Feminism.

    LikeLike


  952. on May 14, 2009 at 4:05 am Welmer

    Chuck

    yes i was beaten up once, by a gang of guys outside a club…didn’t get any hits in though…

    Bummer. Even so, it’s meager consolation when you get the worst of it.

    anyway, of course i know the cops would be more interested in protecting a woman who screamed rape…i know the gross distortion of the legal system in this country skewed in favor of women…it has arisen from the age old ideas of “protecting our women” and “chivalry”.

    perhaps you’re setting me up for some point here, but i’m discussing cases in which a woman is actually raped.

    women who scream rape falsely should be hung.

    No, I’m not trying to set you up; I’m just trying to get you to understand why rape is considered more heinous than holding someone down and doing violence to their person. In a totally gender neutral, gender equal society that condones female reproductive choice, then rape should not be any more serious than assault. After all, she can take the “day after” pill or get an abortion if she pleases, and AIDS can be passed on by other forms of assault – such as biting – that involve fluid exchange.

    So then, what’s really the difference? If the difference is that she was imposed upon reproductively, then novaseeker has an irrefutable point. Because I condone neither rape, assault nor cuckoldry, I am neutral on this matter, but I will not stand for gender inequality where reproductive crimes (including cuckoldry) are concerned. If reproductive crimes are bad when they are committed by men, then they shall also be bad when committed by women.

    LikeLike


  953. on May 14, 2009 at 4:12 am novaseeker

    So then, what’s really the difference? If the difference is that she was imposed upon reproductively, then novaseeker has an irrefutable point. Because I condone neither rape, assault nor cuckoldry, I am neutral on this matter, but I will not stand for gender inequality where reproductive crimes (including cuckoldry) are concerned. If reproductive crimes are bad when they are committed by men, then they shall also be bad when committed by women.

    This.

    Honestly, Chuck, I can’t take you very seriously in light of what yioyu have written here. You admit not to having kids or having been through the ringer as a father. Ergo — you have no standing compared to people like Welmer and me.

    I know that as a young buck that sounds really obnoxious. But you are stil a young buck. Enjoy your young buckness. But realize that the views of yourself and the young women of your age here have a very short shelf life. Thay are useful in your day to day, but eventually you will reach that plateau where the rest of us are.

    I wish you luck, with no animosity.

    LikeLike


  954. on May 14, 2009 at 4:24 am Chuck

    Nova:

    were you attributing that passage to me?

    LikeLike


  955. on May 14, 2009 at 4:31 am Welmer

    I’d even go so far as to say that as long as rape is a crime because it imposes upon a woman’s reproductive rights, then aborting a child without the father’s consent, provided he did not conceive the child by rape, should be a crime as well. Or, say the father wants the child to be aborted and the mother does not. Then he should not have to pay child support if she carries the child to term.

    This is all just given feminist logic. Not saying I accept feminist logic, but what’s good for goose is good for the gander, or so they say.

    It’s high time people started carrying things through to their logical conclusion without relying on atavistic notions of morality that have no relevance in modern society. The only other choice is to adjust gender roles so that they are complementary.

    But for all I know, that would probably take a war, and it wouldn’t be the first time…

    LikeLike


  956. on May 14, 2009 at 4:33 am novaseeker

    were you attributing that passage to me?

    No, just drawing your attention to it.

    LikeLike


  957. on May 14, 2009 at 4:36 am novaseeker

    This is all just given feminist logic. Not saying I accept feminist logic, but what’s good for goose is good for the gander, or so they say.

    It’s high time people started carrying things through to their logical conclusion without relying on atavistic notions of morality that have no relevance in modern society. The only other choice is to adjust gender roles so that they are complementary.

    But for all I know, that would probably take a war, and it wouldn’t be the first time…

    Yes, but this is our aim for now —> getting others to realize that this impacts them and so on.

    LikeLike


  958. on May 14, 2009 at 4:40 am novaseeker

    And aim for me now personally is sleep — cheers all and speak tomorrows

    LikeLike


  959. on May 14, 2009 at 6:57 am Tarl

    @anony

    -all men get rectal exams….not humiliating?

    Nope.

    Getting a patdown at the airport is not humiliating, either. It’s an annoying waste of time, but it’s not humiliating.

    @Chuck

    I notice that you are basically admitting to the use of inflammatory words like “rape” for added shock value. You’re straight from the Frank Luntz, Karl Rove school of word modification.

    But I’m not interested in using inflammatory words to get my agenda across.

    Heh. So comparing him to Karl Rove is not intended to be inflammatory?

    the fact that what goes into raising a child consists of more than just money does nothing to further your point that this should be called rape.

    Say what? It is precisely the fact that what goes into raising a child is much more than just time and money that makes raising another man’s child thinking it is yours as bad as rape. If someone steals your wallet or Madoff defrauds you, you don’t have nearly the emotional investment in that money than you do in a child that you believe is yours, and to discover that it is not yours is utterly devastating in a way that no monetary loss could ever be.

    LikeLike


  960. on May 14, 2009 at 7:17 am nilk

    Also, I don’t see how MPT isn’t the government controlling a woman.

    Hahahahahahahaahaha!

    If we’re looking at the benefits for women of MPT, Kim, how about paternity tests proving she’s not a cheating slapper?

    Two can play at that game, Kim, and goodness knows there are plenty of shows on the teev for women trying to prove their husband/boyfriend/partner is cheating on them.

    If she’s got nothing to hide then she shouldn’t be worried, and there are plenty of places doing DNA testing at birth anyway.

    What’s one more test among many?

    As a woman, I’m the first to suggest it, since trust is a rare commodity these days, and I have no problems with it.

    Think about it yet another way: you are showing your man that you are so committed to him that you will happily take a test and prove it.

    LikeLike


  961. on May 14, 2009 at 7:18 am nilk

    –when you bitches voluntarily give up child support and alimony, come talking to us, slut.

    Hi, Lurker! How’s it going?

    (sorry, couldn’t resist. overworked and hyped on redbull)

    LikeLike


  962. on May 14, 2009 at 7:19 am Gunslingergregi

    “””””””””””””””””””””””””””””on May 14, 2009 at 12:19 am doug1
    LILGRL

    I agree, in my world the ideal situation is an alpha empire-builder who will stick by me and our family. And be faithful. Is that a lot to ask?

    Yes.

    It’s huge.

    And I can’t see how you remotely offer enough in return.””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””

    The point is any two people who work together towards a goal can be empire builders. This is what most people don’t understand. Everyone wants the person who has already achieved. They are not willing to both put time into something to make it successful together. You can start at 0 as a couple and within a short time be financially independant. It is not rocket science. It is up to the couple to work together instead of against each other. So where lilGRL is now with her man she could encourage him with a little knowledge to make it. Really the guy will most likely be working in the realationship it is a lot of times what the woman helps him do with the resources created from him working that will make them better or worse off if he is not able to handle being in charge of the resources on his own.

    LikeLike


  963. on May 14, 2009 at 7:20 am Gunslingergregi

    Wrong thread lol

    LikeLike


  964. on May 14, 2009 at 8:11 am Kick a Bitch

    So did the stupid cunt (Hax) ever get in touch with Roissy?

    LikeLike


  965. on May 14, 2009 at 8:28 am nilk

    She’s off her rocker on some points…

    chuck, Leslie Cannold is a feminist and an ethicist.

    Personally, I don’t pay a whole lot of attention to what she says.

    The changes in family law here in Oz have mainly been due to the lobbying and actions of men’s groups like the Fatherhood Foundation.

    The child support situation is still far from perfect, but the custody and access issues are slowly being addressed. It’s a long process and frustrating.

    LikeLike


  966. on May 14, 2009 at 9:02 am nilk

    Is cuckolding a man, within marriage, wrong?

    Bhetti, is it wrong?

    Kim, is it wrong?

    Anony, is it wrong?

    Chic Noir, is it wrong?

    Who else is a woman here? You better answer, all of you.

    Tood, it’s wrong.

    There, I’ve answered. Feel better now?

    LikeLike


  967. on May 14, 2009 at 9:10 am Comment_Whatever

    Bhetti:

    I’ve rather become inured to the massive misognyism and there’s too much to tackle today but let me just say, I really need to see a woman scorned who’s actually anywhere near as angry as this for some perspective, because this is alarming.

    End Bhetti

    You’ve obviously never been to divorce court. I assure you, there are some women going over the line there. Less than perhaps the men here make out, but ones who completely lose it are there. Yes, they are.

    Comment_Whatever:

    “Given the nearly disinterested way you deal with extremely serious crimes, I kind of wonder, Rain and, if you have ever had anything really bad happen to you.”

    Rain and:

    This is an emotional non-sequitur. Just because I refuse to label car-theft as “genocide” doesn’t mean I don’t think car theft is a serious crime.

    Quoted the above to prove my point below:

    Comment_Whatever:

    “When she demands child support for the child from the not-father, she does so with the threat of violence from the state.”

    Rain and:

    Such laws are unjust bullshit, but A) that is the government “raping” you, and B) it isn’t “rape” anymore than the government looting you for any other purpose is “rape”. If taking money from a man is “rape,” then all forms of theft and taxation against a man need to be called “rape”. You can’t pretend a man’s wallet is his vagina in one context, and not in every other context. It’s the same damn wallet in every context.

    First, I’m sure everyone is aware that if someone points a gun at someone, and takes their money, it isn’t ‘the gun’ committing theft. The woman points the State at her ex-husband. Trying to dump all the responsibility on the State is a cheap trick, and I’d prefer to just ignore it but it helps make my second point:

    And this is just what I’m talking about. So having tens of thousands of dollars stolen is “bullshit”. That’s all it rises to. While, Rain and, you are screaming about how men shouldn’t use an exaggeration, maybe YOU shouldn’t minimize everything done to them down to “bullshit” or “something that deserves a good ass-kicking” or as you wrote:

    Rain said:

    It doesn’t even mean they should be illegal. They shouldn’t be illegal!

    Basically, Rain and, your blatant minimization of the seriousness of these things at every turn means that I am QUITE SURE that I was right about what I said.

    I don’t need your advice on this particular issue. I don’t want it. So feel free to talk to yourself further on this thread if you like, because I’m done talking to you about this issue.

    LikeLike


  968. on May 14, 2009 at 9:12 am Comment_Whatever

    Oh, and the seriousness, as everyone else says, goes far beyond mere money.

    Obviously.

    LikeLike


  969. on May 14, 2009 at 10:11 am nilk

    analogies are a weak form of argument. your analogy is better than most presented here, BUT, the majority of all new mothers gain nothing by MPT; it is an invasion of family privacy, an assault on her presumption of innocence. Athletes gain collectively because it keeps their competitions viable.

    Anony, how is MPT an invasion of privacy?

    I prefer to look at it as a means of saying to your man, “here you go, babe, we’ve got a child and it comes with it’s very own certificate of authenticity!”

    I’m obviously one of those women who are illogical and stupid, but I just don’t get what the problem is.

    Especially when we live in a world where there is very little privacy – these days it’s a presumption rather than a reality – and anyone can hire a PI to dig up dirt on whomever they choose.

    I ran the idea of MPT past a friend of mine, and her immediate reaction was that it was an invasion of her privacy, and how dare anyone suggest that she didn’t know who the father of her child was.

    I guess I’ve answered my question. Too many women will see it as impugning their honour.

    LikeLike


  970. on May 14, 2009 at 10:41 am Obsidian

    Nilk,
    Your own direct experience, in relaying your girlfriend’s reaction tells you all you need to know, indeed.

    Note how she (and Anony) only cares about the WOMAN’S needs-HER privacy, HER humiliation, HER presumption of guilt, etc.-and NOTHING about the child’s right to know his/her father, NOTHING about the child’s medical health etc, and of course, the Man has no consideration at all.

    And, keep in mind, that the Matt Dubay “Roe For Men” got the same kind of visceral reaction from among the Sisterhood. Shocking, I don’t think so.

    O

    LikeLike


  971. on May 14, 2009 at 11:08 am xsplat

    Nova

    Indeed. I think the notion that it is in any way neutral for a man to routinely approach his wife when she is pregnant and say “Honey, I love you, but you know, I really want to get a paternity test when the child is born…” — that is basically accusing her of committing adultery. To suggest that men should routinely do this with each pregnancy is insane. And to suggest that men who do not want to approach their pregnant wives like this are “weak” or “handicapped” is insulting, shaming language — whether coming from people like anony or alpha supremacists like xsplat.

    Why would a man who wants to test paternity bother to aproach his wife about it? I don’t get it.

    Doug said he’d mention the test before getting involved, as one means to avoid potential problems. Seems a good strategy, for a man with the stones to use it. But if the subject was never broached and the woman is already pregnant, why bother mentioning it? I don’t get it.

    I understand that it would be better for men, on the whole, if we banded together to fight for our collective rights. But should I feel affinity with men, or with the tribe of humans? The feminist approach of banding together to fight for the sisterhood is what got us into this mess. Is it the best tactic to fight there fire with our alternate fire? Or is it instead possible and more pragmatic to simply play by totally different rules altogether. If they are winning at chess, steal their cutlery while taking a pee break. Win at a game they don’t even know they are playing, but which is more important altogether.

    Regarding cuckoldry – I see how it is a crime against individual men. Is it a crime against the tribe of men? Nope. If the man never knows and never suspects and never cares, no harm no foul. And the human race on the whole may be marginally improved upon. As I said before, women tend to be attracted to men who are overall superior – and high t men can be and often are also high status and smart.

    So, my way to help all men, in this case, would not be by advocating for the state to make paternity testing mandatory, but by promoting self awareness and understanding of the the human condition and self-reliance among men. Promoting men to become men. Undermine women’s system of social control altogether, by the only way it truly can be – by saying “boo” to it. Not believing it. Calling its bluff.

    As for the legal institutions that favor women, I do hope some courageous souls will fight that battle.

    But paternity testing is not such a legal battle that needs fighting. Anyone who wants it can get it, without permission from the wife who wears the pants in the family.

    LikeLike


  972. on May 14, 2009 at 11:11 am Marcus Aureliette

    I guess I’ve answered my question. Too many women will see it as impugning their honour.

    Which is one excellent reason to have it bundled in with the barrage of other run-of-the-mill tests done during/post pregnancy. In that context it’s nothing but impartial data, and I imagine a rather strong argument in favour could be made about how it’s necessary to have the genetic info of both parents on record for the benefit of the child….

    It only becomes an “accusation” when it’s a specific request made by their man, which has the potential to be a real can of worms for the future of the relationship if the woman is, in fact, honest, and the man has never broached the subject before. Such a request, made out of the blue, is probably going to stir up righteous indignation from the genuinely innocent.

    LikeLike


  973. on May 14, 2009 at 11:12 am Marcus Aureliette

    Augh! Tags. Apologies.

    LikeLike


  974. on May 14, 2009 at 11:32 am anony

    @Marcus,
    You are over estimating any value/usage of “genetic info of both parents on record”. It is not the scope of the test to provide any useful medical info.

    LikeLike


  975. on May 14, 2009 at 11:36 am anony

    @obsidian,
    You chastised me above for failing to review and counter your “meticulously presented arguments”. I couldn’t find them.

    LikeLike


  976. on May 14, 2009 at 11:42 am anony

    @Marcus Aureliette,
    what exactly is wrong with a woman feeling righteous indignation and her honor impungned? and is your solution to her “problem” running an end around her secretively?

    Any man with a paternity concern can have the test done with or without his wife’s awareness privately. What is the argument to invoke the power of the state to mandate the test?

    LikeLike


  977. on May 14, 2009 at 11:49 am anony

    @obsidian,
    the child’s right to know his/her father, NOTHING about the child’s medical health etc, and of course, the Man has no consideration at all.

    I agree a child has the right to know there father. A man has the right to know his accurate paternity.

    These are questions that can be addressed privately, without dragging in the power of the state.

    As for any medical genetic info. , again, that is beyond the scope of the paternity test.

    LikeLike


  978. on May 14, 2009 at 12:45 pm PatrickH

    Waay too late in this massive thread but: if beta cuckold-suspect has a clear sense of his interests, he should maintain his marriage (it sounds okay, if not great), maintain custody of “his” daughter (he might actually have bonded with her), avoid massive alimony/child support payouts (it won’t matter to the judge that the child isn’t his), put aside all questions of wounded pride, and…

    proceed to fuck every woman he can get his dick into, including…
    his wife’s friends, all of whom no doubt knew about, encouraged, and vicariously exhulted in her infidelity…
    her sisters, if she has any…
    any woman, friend or not, toward whom she has ever shown signs of jealousy, inferiority, envy, etc…
    and of course, his very own lying faithless wife…

    …in the last case, he should make a point of doing his conjugal duty by her once a week (no more or less often), said duty performed exclusively as follows: beta no-more is to take his beta-no-more dick and ram it up his lying faithless wife’s ass good and hard, until on the verge of a fully justiified revenge-enhanced climax, he pulls out and finishes up with a great big sploogy ATM blast all over her lying faithless face (after of course she has thoroughly cleaned him up with her lying faithless tongue–don’t forget the ATM part!).

    The fact is, the courts would chew the guy up if he did the Roissy thing. Not fair (I agree with Roissy on this) but still the fact of the matter. Take a deep breath, beta cuckold, realize where your interests lie, realize as well that your wife’s utter betrayal of you has liberated you from any need to concern yourself with her welfare, and liberated you as well from any marital obligations to her. Realize that if you do love “your” daughter, that’s not going to go away just because you’ve found out whose she really is. If you’ve bonded to her, you’ll stay bonded. Keep her in your life and enjoy her on her own terms.

    And proceed to exact every ounce of revenge you can on your wife. And that, we all know, is best accomplished by keeping her close to you. Under the same roof. Forever and ever. Right where you can get her.

    Stay married. But get revenge. Get even. Reduce your wife to what she has tried to reduce you: a resource whose only purpose is to fulfill your needs. It’s only justice after all, justice of the kind the courts will deny you if you do the prideful thing.

    Revenge is a dish best served icy cold and in banquets that go on for years. And admit, there’s a certain kinky thrill in forcefully sodomizing a lying cheating whore up her lying cheating ass, isn’t there?

    So remember, beta-no-more, when you take your justified revenge, every week on the week, when you f*ck your lying faithless wife up her lying faithless ass, don’t use any lube!

    Lube is for betas.

    LikeLike


  979. on May 14, 2009 at 12:53 pm Marcus Aureliette

    anony:
    You are over estimating any value/usage of “genetic info of both parents on record”. It is not the scope of the test to provide any useful medical info.

    My apologies; I am ignorant of the medical specifics of the test.

    But if it’s not a complete mapping of genetic data, then how can it possibly be an invasion of privacy?

    LikeLike


  980. on May 14, 2009 at 12:54 pm roissy

    POS:
    what exactly is wrong with a woman feeling righteous indignation and her honor impungned?

    when paternity and the possiblity of 18 years of indentured servitude to the biggest lie of them all is on the line, a woman’s righteous indignation and faux honor are no more weighty concerns than the size of the dump i took today.

    and is your solution to her “problem” running an end around her secretively?

    your indignation at MPT is a case study of evolutionary psychology theory in action. way to go, puppet.

    Any man with a paternity concern can have the test done with or without his wife’s awareness privately.

    i urge every man to do so, particularly men married to transparently fearful bitches like anony.

    What is the argument to invoke the power of the state to mandate the test?

    what is the argument to invoke the power of the state to mandate drivers’ tests?
    MPT by it’s very nature of being mandatory removes the stigma, the awkwardness, the emotional adulteration, the lapses in judgment and conscientiousness, and the loopholes by which women intent on deception can game the system and their beta chump husbands.
    that you fear and loathe it under the glibly assinine and false rubric of “preserving” a woman’s “ability to trust the state” is no surprise at all to any man who knows how women think and operate.

    ps you continue proving what a fucking magnificent filthy cunt you are.

    pps 1,000 comments, people. almost there.

    LikeLike


  981. on May 14, 2009 at 12:56 pm PA

    PatrickH – bravo, man. Your coment about revenge is exactly the reason I wanted you to come back here.

    LikeLike


  982. on May 14, 2009 at 1:05 pm Kick a Bitch

    lol, any bitch that declares that MPT is wrong is scared of losing the ability to use this in the future. much like a bitch that that gets upset when asked to sign a pre-nup.

    it’s like this, if your bitch-ass isn’t going to fuck around and/or attempt to soak your husband when YOU lose interest in the marriage that YOU most likely pushed for, then you should have NO PROBLEM with MPT or pre-nups.

    suckit sluts

    LikeLike


  983. on May 14, 2009 at 1:06 pm roissy

    patrickh:
    Realize that if you do love “your” daughter, that’s not going to go away just because you’ve found out whose she really is.

    so certain are you?
    love dies all the time. it can die with children too. especially children conceived of an interloper’s seed.

    If you’ve bonded to her, you’ll stay bonded.

    bonds break. humans aren’t crazy glue.

    Keep her in your life and enjoy her on her own terms.

    why? to keep society functioning? fuck that noise.

    And proceed to exact every ounce of revenge you can on your wife.

    the best revenge is leaving her and the bastard child to fend for themselves, and to die on the icy plains if it should come to that. her welfare, the child’s well-being, and society’s interests are not the cuckold’s moral crisis. if he has wasted years and resources raising the bastard under false pretense, then revenge should include material restitution, even if it absolutely bankrupts mother and child. she can always hunt down the biological father and try to cajole support out of him. heh.

    remember betas: listen to excusers and shamers like anony and patrickh. keep giving til you bleed the fuck out. it’s for the best. society thanks you for your sacrifice.

    LikeLike


  984. on May 14, 2009 at 1:08 pm Marcus Aureliette

    anony:

    what exactly is wrong with a woman feeling righteous indignation and her honor impungned? and is your solution to her “problem” running an end around her secretively?

    I’m not saying there’s anything “wrong” with it, I’m saying that it’s a potential side effect of the request. Forcing the man to request the test puts the burden of creating that drama unfairly on his shoulders. Why should he have to ask for that information at all? If it can simply be provided, why shouldn’t it be?

    The test itself is not an accusation, but the request for the test might be interpreted as one, and create trust issues where there previously were none. And if he wins the knowledge that it is his child, but the parental relationship is damaged in the process, how does that benefit anyone?

    Any man with a paternity concern can have the test done with or without his wife’s awareness privately. What is the argument to invoke the power of the state to mandate the test?

    Because a man has a right to definitively know the paternity of a child if he’s going to raise it as his own, and his only choices for obtaining that data should not be a) confrontation, or b) deception.

    The actual testing doesn’t even require anything of the mother – why are you so adamantly against making the test de rigeur, as so many pregnancy-related tests already are?

    LikeLike


  985. on May 14, 2009 at 1:09 pm Kick a Bitch

    ahahahahahaha!!!!

    lube is for betas

    oh man, I LOVE this guy…

    HIGH-FIVE!!!

    LikeLike


  986. on May 14, 2009 at 1:15 pm PA

    If a dude lets “his” kid grow up to 5 or 6 years old and only then suspect cuckoldry, something’s wrong with him.

    Especially given the availability of paternity tests and the fact that there is enough genetic variation within America’s white population to make it unlikely his wife would have cheated withthe dude’s look-alike.

    LikeLike


  987. on May 14, 2009 at 1:25 pm Arpagus

    Contrary to what Chuck thinks, there is in fact considerable legal precedent for convictions of men for rape by fraud, with no allegation of violence whatsoever. The most egregious case was a man convicted of rape of a prostitute for not paying the bargain price (that conviction was however quashed on appeal). As of 1994, English law states that “A man also commits rape if he induces a married woman to have sexual intercourse with him by impersonating her husband.” Rape by fraud even predates feminist law. A large number of cases are reported of men convicted of rape of women who consented to sexual intercourse in the belief that the rapist was their husband in Victorian times. Or at least the women claimed they believed the intruder was their husband, and at that time the penalty for rape was death!

    Reference: RAPE BY FRAUD. Sir Michael Morland, The Liverpool Law Review Vol. XVI(2), 1994.

    And of course, feminists keep pushing the envelope of rape law by including all sorts of fraud in the definition:

    Rape by Fraud and Rape by Coercion
    Patricia J. Falk
    Cleveland-Marshall College of Law
    Brooklyn Law Review , Vol. 64, No. 1, 1998.

    Abstract:
    For more than a century, courts, legislatures, and legal commentators have struggled with the controversial and highly charged question of whether accomplishing sexual intercourse by means of fraud or coercion is blameworthy and appropriately condemnable as rape. In 1986 Professor Susan Estrich suggested that rape law should “prohibit fraud to secure sex to the same extent we prohibit fraud to secure money, and prohibit extortion to secure sex to the same extent we prohibit extortion to secure money.” (Susan Estrich, Rape, 95 Yale L. J. 1087, 1120 (1986)). Such suggestion spawned the latest cycle of discussion about this age-old conundrum in the American legal academic community. As the cases proliferate and the intellectual debate in response to Estrich’s suggestion rages on, state legislatures, riding the successive waves of rape reform of the 1950s and 1970s, have been quietly enacting a comprehensive array of criminal statues outlawing multiple forms of sexual offenses committed by fraudulent or coercive means.

    The potential criminalization of rape by fraud and rape by coercion is, however, a difficult and troublesome legal development for a myriad of reasons. First, cases involving such acts pose significant definitional challenges for the crime of rape, inevitably implicating the debate over whether it is a crime of violence or a sexual offense and the concomitant issue of the proper function of rape law as either protecting citizens’ physical security or, more broadly, sexual autonomy. Second, because these cases generally involve factual scenarios in which physical force is absent and consent, in some form, is present, they strike at the doctrinal heart of rape law, raising issues like: the appropriate relationship between the elements of force and nonconsent, the necessity of physical force, and the parameters of legally effective consent. Third, discussion of these offenses often “trigger[s] common prejudices about the behavior of men and women in sexual encounters” (Martha Chamallas, Consent, Equality, and the Legal Control of Sexual Conduct, 61 S. Cal. L. Rev. 777, 832 (1988)) and reinvigorates colloquy about rape victims’ culpability and trustworthiness, deflecting attention from what should be the real question — the criminality of defendants’ conduct. In short, consideration of these offenses pushes the envelope of rape law’s function in regulating the outermost limits of sexual encounters in our society.

    Feminists are forever trying to figure out how to convict more men for rape even if there is no violence:

    Rape Without Consent
    Victor Tadros
    Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Oct. 1, 2006), pp. 515-543

    This article is a defence of a differentiated offence of rape. A differentiated offence is an offence which can be completed in a number of different ways that cannot be captured in a simple definition. It is argued that such an offence would meet several concerns that have been expressed in the feminist literature about the law of rape. It would assist certainty, it would reduce the extent to which the offence focuses on the conduct of the complainant, it would allow the law to express that violence is central to the offence of rape where violence is present, but it would also allow convictions of rape where there is no violence. The argument is developed through critical engagement with the law of rape as set out in the Sexual Offences Act 2003. The Sexual Offences Act, it is argued, fails adequately to meet the concerns outlined above.

    LikeLike


  988. on May 14, 2009 at 1:32 pm schoolboy

    Commenter 1,000 gets an autographed lay-guide book by roissy.

    Only one has ever been published.

    LikeLike


  989. on May 14, 2009 at 1:38 pm maurice

    @arpagus: pretty horrifying stuff. Procuring sex through fraud is rape? Like if a man implies he’s rich or successful or something else (but he’s not) the woman is attracted to him and has sex with him, then it could potentially be turned around in court and called rape because of “fraud” ? Or is there some higher stadard of fraud, likeimpersonating the husband per above? Yipes.

    Also – Susan Estrich? The mastermind of the Dukakis campaign in ’88? Gee, I really care what she has to say. But I guess really I should if this stuff is percolating around through the legal system …

    LikeLike


  990. on May 14, 2009 at 1:42 pm gig

    PatrickH

    live to see the whore every day? The living proof of your humiliation, the bastard, walking and talking to you?
    You are proposing as revenge what I think would happen to most guys in that situation, acceptance of humiliation.

    Besides, why shouldn’t the whore ask for divorce once he starts doing what you proposed? She’ll be the victim, in this case, the righteous though humiliated wife.

    LikeLike


  991. on May 14, 2009 at 1:43 pm kam

    “Commenter 1,000 gets an autographed lay-guide book by roissy.”

    And if it’s a female, you get to have condomless sex with him

    LikeLike


  992. on May 14, 2009 at 1:45 pm anony

    what is the argument to invoke the power of the state to mandate drivers’ tests?

    its a test of competency of skill to be used on a state owned highway. Using a state owned highway is a privilege.
    All analogies fail, and that was a particularly weak one.

    MPT by it’s very nature of being mandatory removes the stigma, the awkwardness, the emotional adulteration, the lapses in judgment and conscientiousness, and the loopholes by which women intent on deception can game the system and their beta chump husbands.

    Your solution (MPT) displaces the “stigma, awkwardness, ..” born by chump husbands who can not deal with all that themselves, with a burden for all women. To go through a pregnancy and delivery, and then be assaulted by the state to prove your newborns paternity is a undignified and humiliating. So you replace the icky emotions from a few men to all women.

    LikeLike


  993. on May 14, 2009 at 1:48 pm Tarl

    There is no indignity or humiliation or assault associated with a swab to the inside of the cheek of a newborn.

    The only woman who would be “humiliated” by this test are the ones who haven’t been faithful to their husbands.

    LikeLike


  994. on May 14, 2009 at 1:53 pm Default User

    5

    LikeLike


  995. on May 14, 2009 at 1:53 pm Default User

    4

    LikeLike


  996. on May 14, 2009 at 1:54 pm Default User

    3

    LikeLike


  997. on May 14, 2009 at 1:54 pm Default User

    2

    LikeLike


  998. on May 14, 2009 at 1:55 pm Default User

    1

    LikeLike


  999. on May 14, 2009 at 1:56 pm anony

    @MAurielette,

    Forcing the man to request the test puts the burden of creating that drama unfairly on his shoulders. Why should he have to ask for that information at all?

    because it is his life, his marriage, his child, his suspicions, his concern.
    Why would a man not take care of this himself?

    LikeLike


  1000. on May 14, 2009 at 1:57 pm Gunslingergregi

    go

    LikeLike


  1001. on May 14, 2009 at 1:57 pm Default User

    The above poster wins the prize.

    Enjoy it.

    LikeLike


  1002. on May 14, 2009 at 1:58 pm Default User

    Oops anony wins not gunny.

    LikeLike


  1003. on May 14, 2009 at 2:00 pm Default User

    sara I, contrarian, Darth Maul, et al

    One of you has got to make a “1,000+ comments. What losers” post.

    LikeLike


  1004. on May 14, 2009 at 2:20 pm Gunslingergregi

    Yea default thanks for line up it was close he he he

    LikeLike


  1005. on May 14, 2009 at 2:43 pm sara I

    Tood

    Is it wrong for a married woman to have a child with another man, and still trick her husband into think it is his, and draw financial support from the duped man?

    Highly fucking wrong. Sorry, if I didn’t make that clear enough. Horrible shit, that.

    LikeLike


  1006. on May 14, 2009 at 2:46 pm sara I

    PatrickH

    proceed to fuck every woman he can get his dick into, including…
    his wife’s friends, all of whom no doubt knew about, encouraged, and vicariously exhulted in her infidelity…
    her sisters, if she has any…
    any woman, friend or not, toward whom she has ever shown signs of jealousy, inferiority, envy, etc…
    and of course, his very own lying faithless wife…

    Sorry, but you are so vile and sick it’s hard to imagine. Using sex, the act that creates life. for revenge is sick beyond words and it amazes me that some here can advocate the use of it in such a way. We don’t need a place called hell when men or women are using sex this way. Creepy does not come close to describing it. Now I must go wash.

    LikeLike


  1007. on May 14, 2009 at 2:49 pm roissy

    POS:
    its a test of competency of skill to be used on a state owned highway. Using a state owned highway is a privilege.

    MPT is a test of competency of the woman’s faithfulness to be legally permitted the privilege of access to the biological father’s resources.

    All analogies fail, and that was a particularly weak one.

    not at all. the point, which you have so studiously missed, is that the state routinely mandates policies for which it could be assumed, under the terms of your twisted rationalizations and glib counterarguments, to “destroy trust by the state”.
    that you are too stupid to comprehend the lesson in my analogies is not my concern. but rubbing your face in it is.

    Your solution (MPT) displaces the “stigma, awkwardness, ..” born by chump husbands who can not deal with all that themselves, with a burden for all women.

    the onus to “deal with it” is not on anyone if the state mandates MPT. if there were an onus, it would not be on the husband but on the wife/mother who has the biological advantage of maternal certainty.

    To go through a pregnancy and delivery, and then be assaulted by the state to prove your newborns paternity is a undignified and humiliating.

    you hyperbolic cunt. “assaulted” by the state? a q-tip swab of the inside of the baby’s cheek does not assault anyone.
    you reveal your true cunty colors here, anony. disingenuous and deceitful to the core, your blackened bitch heart on display for everyone.

    So you replace the icky emotions from a few men to all women.

    MPT removes any “icky emotions” from both parties as it is a required procedure administered without bias or favor. plausible assertions of trust are maintained. do you feel icky emotions when you have to give proof of income to a loan agency?

    ps how does it feel, anony, dancing to the tune of your genetic master? i have easily and masterfully gotten you to reveal the darwinistic mudpit in which your soul wallows. you have surrendered any moral high ground.

    LikeLike


  1008. on May 14, 2009 at 2:59 pm Chuck

    Tarl:

    “Heh. So comparing him to Karl Rove is not intended to be inflammatory?”

    No, comparing him to you would be imflammatory. Nova is somewhat conservative from what I’ve read, so it shouldn’t be much of a shot at him.

    LikeLike


  1009. on May 14, 2009 at 3:01 pm Kamal S.

    I favor, in theory, mandatory paternity testing. I do have concerns with the potential for abuse, implicit in the accumulation of vast databases of DNA and genetic information, based on test results, concentrated in the administration of the State. I distrust the State in principle, and see no reason to allow it to monopolize valuable genetic information, given the real danger of top down eugenic regimentation type solutions being imposed on the populace by an increasingly nanny like state that claims to know our best interests better than we do.

    A possible disintermediation would be to let the private sector manage such database and testing, and mandate strict privacy concerns. Nothing, however, will stop the state from double-dipping into the gooey mass of yummy data under the guise of national security.

    This is not an idle concern, it ain’t diaper wetting milksop paranoia. No, there is a real danger implicit in all of this that needs to be sanely, and reasonably, examined. There is always a trade off between individual rights and collective rights, but the matter should be sanely examined and debated.

    As for the trust being at the base of every marriage, this is a specious concern that falls apart when you examine it. We know for a fact that in the vast majority of cases such trust is partially misplaced anyway. So if anything, this would reassert a rigorous framework upon which solid trust could exist. I care not for pie in the sky Pollyanna sentimentality when people’s lives wealth and happiness are at stake. And they are.
    If such testing is mandatory then the state is basically an intermediary and buffer between the husband and wife, mother and father. The implication is no longer “I don’t trust you dear”, because the distrust is displaced on to a bureaucratic level and the whole matter becomes one of due routine procedure. “Honey, of course I trust you, but the gubberment sez we hafta do it…”

    Besides, cheating is an act of passion, and passion is like the wind. It comes, and it goes, and it defies reason. The degree of virtue and discipline necessary to resist it is frankly lacking in most cases, most people can barely withstand their base passions in eating shitty food. People lacking this degree of self control, on a societal scale, are unworthy, I submit, of being trusted when it comes to their cocks and cunts wandering, to put things suitably crassly.
    Some of the best women I’ve known have participated in some sort of cheating, either as the cheating party or the willing vulva for a male partner’s cheating. The ones who have not, I suspect could in the right circumstances. Human weakness.
    It happens, our society’s loose mores facilitates it, cheating has always happened and has been common in even the most rigidly patriarchal social orders, so what about now in near anonymity and a cultural environment that barely condemns it? If people literally conditioned to fear hell fire and God’s throne’s judgment (and people not born in a very religious ambiance simply wouldn’t understand how weighty these fears are) still find ways to rationalize cheating, then people raised in a cultural ambiance that only weakly condemns the matter have to have a real, significant, degree of self discipline.

    Chaucer has stories, funny stories, about cuckoldry. A significant portion of 1001 Arabian nights is full of jokes or stories about cuckoldry. Shakespeare as well. Jalaludin Rumi. Yes it is fiction, but it reflects a past society’s own self view. Societies far more anal retentive than ours dealt with it. Good god almighty, in the middle of Taliban ruled Afghanistan people were still fucking their neighbors’ wives on rooftops in the open.

    Human nature is constant irrespective of race, clime, or time.
    The only thing possibly new today is the degree… and even in the 1950s jokes about the mailman and milkman were quite common in our society.

    These are basic human impulses that society struggles to channel towards better ends. We would be naïve not to be concerned. The stakes for men and children alike are too high today, not to mention women. How many women have been murdered in passion over the mere suspicion of cheating and cuckoldry? You cannot deny the truth implicit in that question’s answer…

    But mandatory paternity tests … again I distrust the State, and think that this idea should be examined very, very, deeply.

    LikeLike


  1010. on May 14, 2009 at 3:02 pm Marcus Aureliette

    because it is his life, his marriage, his child, his suspicions, his concern.

    Why would a man not take care of this himself?

    Because the only ways you’re permitting him to do that will cost him. Either he has to deal with the fallout of having made the request, or he has to lie by omission. He has to risk emotional cost vs. being dishonest, simply to obtain information to which he is entitled, and which the woman already has.

    How is that in any way fair?

    You’re making an excellent case for men to just go behind their women’s backs. Do you honestly find that preferable to the truth being put on the table at the outset, as a matter of course?

    And we make concessions wrt our privacy every day, on account of the few bad apples who spoil it for the rest. Do you object to going through airline security because you’re insulted at being accused of being a terrorist? No? That’s because it’s not an accusation.

    The only person who should be subject to any stigma whatsoever in this scenario is the woman who attempts to get a man to foot the bill for a child that isn’t his.

    If even a small fraction of men can be spared 18+ years of being deluded & defrauded, and the test itself is no imposition on you at all, how can you deny them justice?

    LikeLike


  1011. on May 14, 2009 at 3:03 pm roissy

    POS:
    because it is his life, his marriage, his child, his suspicions, his concern.

    her freedom to lie without consequence.

    Why would a man not take care of this himself?

    “blame the victim”.

    should a man be consigned to a lifetime of providing for an illegitimate child just because he was too lazy/ignorant/chivalrous to force a paternity test at the time it most mattered?
    maybe to cunts like you, but not to anyone with an ounce of common decency in them.

    LikeLike


  1012. on May 14, 2009 at 3:04 pm Chuck

    i’m really surprised by the abhorence to optionable MPT at birth. for what reason do women have to be against them? a woman wouldn’t readily admit to even being in a situation which could lead to cuckoldry, so what’s to hide?

    social conservatives have a problem though because MPT will lead to a higher rate of abortions no doubt. that doesn’t concern me though.

    LikeLike


  1013. on May 14, 2009 at 3:08 pm Chuck

    to add, MPT will never be widely accepted either legally or socially.

    liberals are too afraid of it infringing on a woman’s right to do whatever, and as i mentioned above, testing will increase the abortion rate, so conservatives won’t back it in large numbers.

    men have no other option than to swab their child’s cheek as soon as it pops out. we have to take these matters into our own hands. not doing so is akin to refusing to take out insurance on your home. murphy’s law holds.

    LikeLike


  1014. on May 14, 2009 at 3:29 pm roissy

    a note on my brilliant, original, and insightful analogy of rape to cuckoldry (TM):

    while opponents of the analogy can squeak by on a technicality (i.e. there is no penetration of a body orifice when cuckoldry is committed), they should know just how reed thin is their counterargument.

    cuckoldry imposes physical costs on the duped man that far exceed the penetrative physical costs of rape in both duration of the evil act and the energy sunk in living as a duped servant of a whore and of the state. cuckoldry perhaps even exceeds rape in bodily degradation. a man has to spend a lot of hours working by the sweat of his brow to fulfill his duty of raising his children. 18 years of working for a slavemaster when the benefit isn’t what was presumed is a high price to pay, maybe the highest price, outside of death. and then there is the issue of the psychological torment a cuckold victim experiences if/when the truth is discovered, a torment which may surpass in hellishness, probably does in fact, the torment felt by a rape victim.

    a rape victim, otoh, has a few minutes of terror and some pain, and psychological torment of varying timelength depending on the constitution of the victim. pregnancy by rape is a real threat, but thank saner heads we have abortion for that. where does a cuckold turn when his resources, efforts, material aggrandizement, and time have been raped by a whore wife? who will reimburse him for his suffering? as of now, no one. the law has basically said “you are on your own, buddy. tough luck!”

    some equivocating bitch asked above, as a thought experiment designed to show the paucity of comparing cuckoldry to rape, “would you rather be buttfucked once in prison or spend 18 years unwittingly raising another man’s child?” i believe if men were honest with themselves, and really thought through the implications of cuckoldry, most would choose the two minute buttfuck before choosing the lifetime of cuckoldry.

    LikeLike


  1015. on May 14, 2009 at 3:34 pm Thursday

    most would choose the two minute buttfuck before choosing the lifetime of cuckoldry.

    Hey, didn’t I say that? And, yes, most men would prefer to be raped (once) to being cuckolded.

    LikeLike


  1016. on May 14, 2009 at 3:35 pm Chuck

    roissy,

    then cuckoldry is worse than rape…fine…still doesn’t make it a solid analogy.

    LikeLike


  1017. on May 14, 2009 at 4:04 pm maurice

    Of course, *neither* is preferable. for the record, though I inexplicably read a lot of this, I didn’t give my $0.02. I think cuckoldry is worse than rape in that cosmic sense, but is more like deception or fraud than rape. It has its origin in a sex act (rape like) but is ultimaltely a long-running emotional and financial fraud (Madoff like). And yes, MPT at birth all the way – no brainer.

    LikeLike


  1018. on May 14, 2009 at 4:07 pm Tarl

    @Sara

    Using sex, the act that creates life. for revenge is sick beyond words

    Oh, but women, wonderful beautiful pure innocent women, NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVER use sex for revenge. Never! Could not happen, has never happened!

    ROFLMAO!!!

    LikeLike


  1019. on May 14, 2009 at 5:07 pm xsplat

    My emotions on this issue are completely amoral. I’ve felt the desire to impregnate engaged women, and nearly acted on it. The ultimate sneaky fucker move. A georgous little woman with a belly just aching to be filled by you, and a waiting and willing parent to bring it up right. What could be better?

    Note I said amoral, not immoral. In the warfare of genes, whoever wins is right.

    LikeLike


  1020. on May 14, 2009 at 5:32 pm nilk

    LOL at Marcus Aureliette for tagging or not.

    It only becomes an “accusation” when it’s a specific request made by their man, which has the potential to be a real can of worms for the future of the relationship if the woman is, in fact, honest, and the man has never broached the subject before. Such a request, made out of the blue, is probably going to stir up righteous indignation from the genuinely innocent.

    A request out of the blue, sure, but look at the hookup culture amongst the younger set (damn I’m feeling old these days). Check out myspace and bebo and xanga to see how a lot of younger people think and act.

    Everything is out on display, there is no such thing as privacy – it’s just a word and a vague, fuzzy concept to a lot of them.

    If we want to look at the genetic health issue as having little to no value, as Anony suggests, then check out the blogs of donor recipient kids. (Now adults).

    Donated Generation is a quick jumping off place.

    As a parent, there’s a lot of joy to be found in where you’ve come from and where your genes are headed.

    It’s also very comforting knowing about potential situations that may arise from hereditary conditions. Simple things like allergies, my girl being slightly pigeon-toed, and personality traits, for example.

    Men like to know these things, too.

    I like Doug’s idea of broaching the subject early in the piece with the new woman in town also. It keeps it up front, and no woman should have any issue with it.

    LikeLike


  1021. on May 14, 2009 at 5:40 pm nilk

    Also to anony – regarding the power of the State.

    Too often women are complicit in using the State to change their situation – it’s a handy tool to get your way with.

    In this instance, if we look at the general reactions of women to the question of MPT, women won’t go quietly into the night, so to speak.

    They’ll be dragged kicking and screaming. It’s the way we are.

    Women often have the libidos and proclivities of men, always have, always will. We just don’t have the social controls on them that we used to, and MPT is obviously seen as a way to re-inforce control by the Eeeevil Patriarchy.

    If we want to spin another way, we women all know how fragile the male ego is, especially in this day of snags and SWPLs and Hope & Change. It will make him feel better, and more confident in his manhood – he sired a child, yay, motile sperm! – and you are helping empower your partner.

    This can only be a Good Thing in such harsh economic, depressing times.

    You can point out that there are so many stories in the media about infidelity from both genders, why not just get it done so if anyone wants to make any sort of fuss, we can just present them with the results and point and laugh at them.

    It’s all in the advertising.

    LikeLike


  1022. on May 14, 2009 at 7:40 pm doug1

    Gunny

    You won a ruthless heartless bitch. lol

    Actually, she dissed herself in that way in an effort to let lurker down more easily. that’s some challenge, it is.

    She dissed herself in that way cause she knows she’s got support.

    LikeLike


  1023. on May 14, 2009 at 8:01 pm Bhetti

    Tarl: where did sara actually say ‘MEN using sex’? She even said ‘We don’t need a place called hell when men or women are using sex this way. ‘

    Deep breaths. Hands at the trigger but berify the target.

    doug: You sure I shouldn’t start calling you The Prince?

    LikeLike


  1024. on May 14, 2009 at 8:02 pm Bhetti

    Tarl: where did sara actually say ‘MEN using sex’? She even said ‘We don’t need a place called hell when men or women are using sex this way. ‘

    Deep breaths. Hands at the trigger but verify the target.

    doug: You sure I shouldn’t start calling you The Prince?

    LikeLike


  1025. on May 14, 2009 at 8:40 pm Tarl

    She didn’t, and she may even deny she meant just men, but we all know what she meant, which is that she finds the thought of a man using a woman’s traditional weapon sick and unacceptable.

    LikeLike


  1026. on May 14, 2009 at 11:05 pm z

    Anony wrote:

    “anony
    @87,
    routine drug testing is welcomed by the athletic community because it keeps sports clean. it might otherwise be a wide-spread problem.”

    Thats exactly why running a swab across the baby’s cheek and the “assumed” father is such a GREAT idea, so that men paying for other men’s children doesn’t become a “wide-spread(no pun intended) problem”.

    You made the argument yourself, liar, thank you.

    LikeLike


  1027. on May 14, 2009 at 11:14 pm Keith

    Roissy, you are given the following choice:

    You are either

    A. Cuckolded

    or

    B. Anally raped.

    Which do you choose?

    If you try any lame jokes rather than make the choice and answer the question, then you officially declare that you are both cuckolded and anally raped on a regular basis.

    LikeLike


  1028. on May 14, 2009 at 11:16 pm Keith

    Oh, somebody beat me to the perfect question.

    “most would choose the two minute buttfuck before choosing the lifetime of cuckoldry.”

    So Roissy chooses anal rape over cuckoldry.

    I’ll admit that it’s a toughie.

    LikeLike


  1029. on May 14, 2009 at 11:49 pm Welmer

    Keith

    Oh, somebody beat me to the perfect question.

    “most would choose the two minute buttfuck before choosing the lifetime of cuckoldry.”

    So Roissy chooses anal rape over cuckoldry.

    I’ll admit that it’s a toughie.

    Well, never having been raped, but having had the shit kicked out of me once, I can say that going through a divorce is far worse than getting your ass kicked. The latter leaves you pissed off and in physical pain for weeks, whereas the former is a continuous beating you receive for a quarter of your life.

    Getting cuckolded could only be worse, because not only does your wife get to kick your ass in court, but when you find out all that pain and remorse over the kid has been due to her whoring, it must make a man feel like the only reason he was ever born was to be cheated and shit on for his entire life.

    Sure, people may have made light of cuckoldry in the past, but with female supremacist divorce laws and mandatory child support there’s nothing funny about it anymore.

    Getting reamed in the rear for a few minutes would definitely suck, but it can’t be as bad as that.

    LikeLike


  1030. on May 15, 2009 at 8:42 am contrarian

    Welmer

    Getting reamed in the rear for a few minutes would definitely suck, but it can’t be as bad as that.

    Why are you not taking into account the lifetime of severe psychological problems you would get in the process? Oh, wait, I know: it would inconviniently nullify your argument.

    LikeLike


  1031. on May 15, 2009 at 1:01 pm Celtic

    Carolyn Hax is doing a live Q&A on washingtonpost.com

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2009/05/07/DI2009050703540.html
    It may be a little late for this one, but we should definitely confront her next time.

    LikeLike


  1032. on May 15, 2009 at 1:10 pm Kamal S.

    The choice between being Cuckolded or Anally raped is an easy one.

    Cuckolded.

    I could learn to love a child that wasn’t mine, though I would never forgive the woman.

    But being butt Raped is unmanning.

    I’d rather die than be unmanned in this way. Besides the legal issues would be a bitch because, I would hunt down, find, lie in wait, and kill, anyone who raped me.

    This would complicate my life with unnecessary legal issues. Frankly, at my age, I don’t need a murder rap.

    LikeLike


  1033. on May 15, 2009 at 2:53 pm say no to marriage

    What’s this defeatist talk in the last few posts about ‘Bad result A’ vs ‘Bad result B’? You are way better than that and you deserve the best in your life, all you men out there.

    All men should learn the THREE GOLDEN RULES regarding marriage, relationship and women.

    If you master these THREE GOLDEN RULES, you will NEVER get charged with DV, never have to pay a dime of alimony/child support. If it’s not obvious by now, cuckolding will never happen too.

    http://mgtow.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=102

    1) No marriage
    2) No cohabitation
    3) Keep genetic materials to yourself

    And the best part? You’re not stuck to one bitch for the rest of your life, you can have all the sex you want on the side; on your terms, and you have more time and money for yourself to pursue the things in your life that really matter.

    Learn and apply the THREE GOLDEN RULES. Now.

    P.S: Those of you married should plan for a divorce. Observe and learn the signs of an imminent divorce to be initiated by your sweet wife of N number of years. Remember that in a divorce, first strike has the advantage. Check out ‘Brutal Divorce Tactics for Men’ for some advice.

    LikeLike


  1034. on May 15, 2009 at 4:18 pm 3point5

    I emailed Mrs. Hex … crazy bitch

    LikeLike


  1035. on May 15, 2009 at 8:15 pm puma80

    Buttsex vs. Cuckoldry? A few minutes of suffering vs. Darwinian Genetic Eternal Metadeath?

    That’s not a very difficult question.

    LikeLike


  1036. on May 17, 2009 at 3:34 pm Chic noir

    MU Nevertheless, from all that I’ve personally read from Chic herself, she would NOT choose to go out w/a Beta Male, and neither would the vast majority of the ladies who regularly post here. Most of them have clearly stated their preferences, and Beta Males aint it.
    Wrong, I have gone out with beta males. I never stated that I hate beta males. There are many types of Beta males and most men are beta males. Hill Harper would qualify as beta but I find him very attractive.
    Mu, I would really like for you to post where I said such a thing. Pull it up from the archives.
    Most of them have clearly stated their preferences, and Beta Males aint it
    The type of slacker beta who has no goals, ambitions in life and only hobby is playing video games, is unattractive to most women, yes. Most betas don’t fall into this category, most are the men you see on the train going to work every morning-beta. The men you see with their families at Disney World-beta. The construction workers you see in a dive bar drinking with their coworkers after a long day’s work-beta. It is what it is and I have no hate for those men nor the slacker beta. Only thing is, while I’m turned off by the slacker beta, the other three are relationship or husband material for most women including myself.
    Men do the same in that all of you want the girl you could be in King or SI yet the average man will end with a 7 at best. Does that mean a guy is evil for lusting after a 10 he sees in the magazine or looking discreetly at the 9’s he see on the streets-NO. Such a man being human and just responding to nature or nurture instincts. Again folks it is what it is.
    Chic has also said, not long after she made the remark referred to above, to Dave Alex, that he would be unsatisfactory because “he couldn’t protect her”. Very true. Note, DA meets my threshold for attractiveness, as well as intelligence and having hobbies, a few of which I share. Quick note: I have a lot of respect for DA’s intelligence as I’v noted here numerous times. I personally can’t see myself with a dumb man no matter how good-looking. A dumb man ranks even lower than one who is unwilling to protect me.
    The harsh truth is that Chic and other ladies will drop their drawers for the Roissys of the world a heck of a lot faster than for the Dave Alex’s.
    Uh, kindly remove my name from that list. Having a man who is willing to protect you does not translate into dating someone like Roissy. Just because a man is good at sleeping around doesn’t correlate with being willing to protect you. There are some men who would run if confronted by a bigger stronger man(no gun), leaving their woman to fend for herself. Sorry, I just can’t get with this type of guy.
    Furthermore Mu , I’ve mentioned(look into the archives) that I put distance between myself and men with that Obama/Clinton aura. I don’t like the way they make me “feel”. Yes I like good-looking men, no I don’t apologize for that but I’ve dated men who are not “10”s. I date men who I would call “6”s. So what, you aren’t into size 00s and I don’t begrudge you that, Roissy isn’t in to big booty chics I don’t begrudge him that either . We all have our preferences.
    Now a Whiskey, MB or Peter type is more my speed. I don’t see either of the two running away if they have to protect their family from an armed intruder, but otherwise they are easy going. I don’t like drama, and I’m the type who can entertain herself fairly easy on the cheap. In other words, I don’t need a man who will smoother and he needs to be the same. I have my own hobbies and he should have his.
    sick sick sick. I believe this to be (bold) true and it’s one of the reasons why I don’t like to go off with a group of males by myself. There is just something about men and running gang bangs on women. I guess that’s there way of teaming up on the weaker of the two genders. Maybe it speaks to the violence just bubbling down inside of men.

    LikeLike


  1037. on May 18, 2009 at 3:00 pm sara I

    Oh Tarl, you little trigger happy idiot.

    Oh, but women, wonderful beautiful pure innocent women, NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVER use sex for revenge. Never! Could not happen, has never happened!

    And this:

    She didn’t, and she may even deny she meant just men, but we all know what she meant, which is that she finds the thought of a man using a woman’s traditional weapon sick and unacceptable.

    Yeah sure. Women use SEX to get MONEY from men and it ain’t so fucking pretty when that happens, is it? It’s pretty despicable in fact. And it feels just as shitty as it does to a woman to be used for sex when SHE is wanting to be viewed as a worthy individual and not just a wet hole for a man to use and discard like a piece of trash while he brags to his friends and calls her a slut……hmmmmmm? LOL

    LikeLike


  1038. on May 18, 2009 at 3:30 pm Tarl

    Sara, you and Bhetti both think I made a mistake. You’re both wrong. I knew exactly what the actual message said. I responded to the meta-message. The more outraged you act, the more obvious it is that my interpretation of the meta-message was correct.

    LikeLike


  1039. on August 1, 2009 at 7:32 pm Jay

    This blog is literally addictive. I spent two days solid reading shitloads of posts on it.

    LikeLike


  1040. on November 19, 2009 at 2:51 pm Meet The Real Biggest Losers « Roissy in DC

    […] woman who even utters a peep against MPT has shown her cards. She is a filthy wretched cuntrag who wishes the system to be rigged in her favor – morality, fairness, and justice be […]

    LikeLike


  1041. on January 6, 2010 at 5:23 pm Arthur

    I think a fair comparison would be expecting women who are victims of rape to give birth to the rapist’s baby. It doesn’t matter who the genetic father is, right? Best interests of the child?

    LikeLike


  1042. on September 10, 2010 at 7:24 pm Rarfy

    I disagree with your analysis of the article. While, admittedly, the article was incredibly inartfully written, the gist of it was: “If you know that you don’t have the balls to leave your wife even if she did cheat on you, don’t go looking too deeply into this situation.”

    The writer at least realized she might be addressing a beta who would, like the chump he is, stick with his wife no matter what he found out and then hate the child, mother and himself for the rest of their natural lives.

    LikeLike


  1043. on September 14, 2010 at 4:58 am Not Rarfy

    Rarfy , dude , we know the gist. That’s why we hate it. Spare us the “alpha” and “beta” crap , the dude asked for advice and she said “you go ahead and be miserable but don’t you dare make your wife unhappy”.

    LikeLike


  1044. on September 17, 2010 at 7:57 pm Rarfy

    > Spare us the “alpha” and “beta” crap

    Ummmmmmm… that’s what this entire blog is about, brotha.

    And I don’t share your analysis of what she said in her rather confusingly written article.

    LikeLike


  1045. on November 25, 2010 at 12:45 pm Gorbachev

    Any woman who (knowingly) cuckolds a man deserves:

    – Scorn
    – Shame
    – Public humiliation
    – Condemnation
    – Social Exile
    – Requirements for financial compensation and restitution

    She deserves to be spat on by passers-by and reviled by her own children as a piece of venomous filth.

    If she’s cuckolded a man (but wasn’t sure) –

    Then she deserves all of the above anyway. She could have gotten a test. If she found out it wasn’t his, and then cuckolded him, then it’s conscious.

    There’s no excuse. I would be ashamed to be associating in any way, disgusted with myself, for associating with this kind of woman. I might attempt to seduce this kind of harpy is she were attractive, but she deserves no respect of any kind, no sympathy and no trust of any kind. Ever. She’s amoral trash and should be discarded by society as a wretched example of poisonous social evil.

    She’s the putrid amoral scum and smegma on the surface of the wretched pond of human villainy. Her life should be one of unremitting shame and humiliation. She should be embarrassed to look at her own reflection and too humiliated to address her children in public.

    If you ever meet such a woman, it’s your moral duty to point out her shame, embarrass her, and see to it that she suffers the maximum social shame it’s possible to inflict.

    Such a woman is morally disgusting.

    On the other hand, if the man acquiesces or consents to being cuckolded, then you need to remove any shame directed at her and assume the equivalent degree of pity for the male. That this degrades him as well is par for the course.

    None of this is exaggeration. I actually feel this way.

    LikeLike


  1046. on November 25, 2010 at 10:28 pm xsplat

    gig

    I am with the women in this one. Guys like this must suffer. And be wiped out from the gene pool.

    Gig and I seem to be the only male voices of non-solidarity.

    Chateaus article does remind that those who do fuck married and hitched up girls won’t be pushing for mandatory paternity testing. Best interest informs bias.

    But other than that, what’s with this men’s best interest angle?

    I’m into my best interest angle. Let the betas lose. Poor them. They lose, I win.

    LikeLike


  1047. on December 2, 2010 at 8:16 pm Legion

    “But being butt Raped is unmanning.”

    Being cuckolded is unmanning. Unmanning times a fucking thousand. Read up on the history of cuckolds.

    I would prefer the quick physical and emotional pain of being buttraped than to spend two decades toiling to raise a bastard spawn. Cuckoldry cuts to the absolute core of a man. Trying to rationalise “why” men should be upset is a red herring: our brains are wired to react with intense revulsion to the prospect of being cuckolded.

    LikeLike


  1048. on December 2, 2010 at 8:20 pm Legion

    By the way, women will cuckold alphas too. Not nearly as much as betas, but it happens.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Libertardian on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    gunslingergregi on Manifest Depravity
    Lance Draper on Beta O’Rourke
    gunslingergregi on Manifest Depravity
    PDB on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    PDB on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    gunslingergregi on The Confound Of Silence
    gunslingergregi on The Confound Of Silence
    gunslingergregi on The Confound Of Silence
    gunslingergregi on The Confound Of Silence
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hivemind Is Real
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Manifest Depravity
    • The Diminishing Returns Of Anti-White Virtue Signaling
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Revolutionary Spirals To Civil War 2
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: