Merry Christmas!

« Patterns

The Dark Lord »

Merry Christmas!

December 25, 2009 by CH

Posted in Funny/Lolblogs | 330 Comments

330 Responses

on December 25, 2009 at 10:16 am roissy

look at the sack on that kid. no wonder he’s chilling like he owns christmas.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 10:29 am Merry Christmas All

As antidote to this ghastly betaness I offer authentic alpha male and MLB Hall of Famer George Brett in “I Shit My Pants Last Night”:

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 11:10 am Dat_truth_hurts

Haha! I feel like I’m gong to shit my pants from all the home cooking I’ve eaten so far. Fucking cookies

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 11:30 am Merry Christmas All

Oh, and if you’ve ever wondered who’s minding LR’s kid while she’s menstruating indignantly all over the internet, as our man Roissy might say, I’ve obtained top secret video answering that question:

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 11:42 am mr mike

are we taking bets to see how long until the dude has to pawn the earring to make alimony/cs payments?

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 11:46 am Anonymous

natural alphaness of the kid… unfortunately with a dad like that and society what it is, it will probably be conditioned out of him

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 11:49 am aka. game

Look at the natural alphaness in that kid! Unfortunately with a dad like that and society as it is, he will probably be beta of the year some day

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 11:53 am Gregory Magarshak

most kids are alpha

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 12:49 pm Advocatus Diaboli

Is that his kid?

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 12:52 pm Cecilia

That baby doesn’t resemble either parent.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 12:52 pm Jay

Got damn

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 12:55 pm Esquire

Boys are mostly born alphas. Look at that kid. Takes a lot of women and society to grow them into betas.

If you’re a father to sons – and if you care about the future at all, you should be, despite all the worthy caveats found here, there is no btter feelng in the world than having sons – make damn sure the gals don’t betatize your boys.

Most important thing you will ever do …

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 12:57 pm Angry Asian Man

Merry Christmas and Happy New Years. To give some much needed cheer to all the forlorn betas out there, behold, there is a god.

http://www.chinasmack.com/pictures/brother-inspiration-fat-taiwanese-boy-pretty-girlfriend/

If there is hope for them, there is probably hope for you.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 1:13 pm Me

It’s hard for me to believe that this guy is someone’s father. I know, there’s a baby in the picture but, really? Are you sure? He’s just too gay.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 1:22 pm Cat Patrol

The posing in PJs was her idea too, and he meekly went along with it. Probably sent it out to dozens of their friends with the Christmas cards….

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 2:19 pm Anonymous

The kid rocks.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 2:19 pm Mike

Is that LR?

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 2:25 pm epiclolz

ha, thr kid’s rocking the catapult with a ‘F@$# you i’m awesome’ look on his face.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 3:41 pm GayButtox

look at the sack on that kid. no wonder he’s chilling like he owns christmas.

Diaper…

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 4:15 pm Toosh

It’s called sperm donations you numbskulls.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 4:19 pm Horatio Sanchez

I’m not sure what to make of this one. The guy looks kind of chavish. He could have pulled in the best chavettes in town in his glory days, it’s hard to say. His general appearance is what struck me first… the realization he was wearing a gay outfit came later.

His bitch has the face of a harridan. Did he attain her by alpha cred, or was she settling? The kid does look like a thuglet in the making… a “credit” to the father? Still, no self-respecting alpha would wear that gay outfit.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 5:10 pm Tarl

The “sack” on the kid is a wet, wet diaper. =)

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 5:17 pm Lash

the picture:

the explanation:

Lee and Jennifer are newly married and hired me to take photos in DC of them and their 11 month old Standard Poodle Meeka! Animals are part of any family so why shouldn’t you have a photo shoot with them? It always adds a bit of adventure to the photograph people with their animals because they have their own agendas. Thank god for Meeka’s favorite ball keeping her attention on me. Congrats to Lee and Jennifer starting out their life together with a great companion and lots of laughter from what I can see!! Here is a sneak peak [sic] of the shoot!

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 5:36 pm Willard Libby

Merry Christmas!

Yes.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 6:05 pm Jeteson

I’m thinking she’s a cheating ho ho ho….

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 6:21 pm gig

I´d do the mother. happily

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 6:36 pm gig

@ willard

that´s one th best sites ever linked to in Roissy´s

@ jetteson

can you seriously blame her?

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 8:30 pm GayButtox

I´d do the mother. happily

You must be a black guy with no standards.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 8:33 pm DJDamage

The head position of the father is resting on her shoulders like a typical beta. She seems to be the dominant one in this relationship and most likely older then her partner.

This makes me wonder if the baby is really his (looks nothing like Mr Chin over here) or he has volunteered to help raising another man’s child who seems to be more comfortable in this picture then he is.

Plus he looks like a tool dressed up exactly like the baby, i bet it was her “fun idea” and he obligated.

Merry Christmas!!!

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 8:42 pm maurice

the baby is clearly the most alpha in the pic. keep it up, dude. you’ve got a future.

charlie sheen was arrested in aspen today on a domestic violence charge. why am i not more surprised…? leopards don’t really change their spots.

merry xmas all.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 8:42 pm Me

The man is the baby’s gay uncle.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 8:49 pm GayButtox

We don’t know for certain if the baby is male. It is not that easy to tell at such a young age.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 9:01 pm chi-town

This is an obvious suspected cuckold situation since the kid looks nothing like him. Hell I could understand why she would cheat on him.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 9:09 pm aliasclio

To all those saying that the baby looks nothing like his/her father (though I agree he’s probably a boy) – nonsense. The father has dark red hair, and Junior has the kind of lighter red hair that gets darker with age. Just look at the dad’s red roots to see what I mean about his hair. Red hair is rare enough (recessive gene) that it would be very difficult to ensure that the gene got passed on, even if you could find a red-haired sperm donor or partner in adultery.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 10:18 pm Jay Gatsby

The whole pajama pose is the ghey. Guess who thought of the idea? Here’s a hint – it wasn’t the guy.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 10:19 pm Anonymous

You’re a mean one Mr. Grinch.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 10:30 pm DeepThought

Does the moron who edited Brett’s great story actually think it makes it better? Sign of a beta…he can’t tell a good story when it hits him in the face.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 10:32 pm hans

A ginger kid to two brown haired parents? Odd.
Very doubtful that Earing was able to spread his genes here.

The kid looks soo much like a St.Patricks day drunken knockup, it isn´t funny anymore.

LikeLike
on December 25, 2009 at 10:43 pm Phoenixism

(Adult) red onesy guy has a really red nose. No doubt hitting the eggnog a little too aggressively in order to smooth out the symbolic holiday castration he’s endured at the hands of his wife, er mom, er baby mama.

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 2:00 am el chief

She’s pretty MILFy. I give her that.

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 8:49 am The_King

…I finally got the joke. The baby isn’t even his! How is it possible for a baby to have blond hair when brown hair is a dominant gene? If both parents are brunets it is impossible ot have a blond haired child. LOL That picture is awesome. Shows total betatude.

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 9:01 am joel

IMHO, we live in one sick society. Those pictures and this thread are a good illustration of this.

I am not sure who is to blame; women, or the men who enable them. But, I sure know who the victims are. The married upper middle class men I know seek solace in things like boats, vacation homes, and I hope for their sake, mistresses. Naturally, the latter could be risky financially given our marriage laws. It is getter harder to find a situation where a financially well off man is better off married than single. I only know one woman I would want to be married to in my circle of acquaintances, and she comes from Malta.

BTW, the 2nd Islamic terror attack on US soil took place this year, on a Detroit bound passenger jet yesterday. Versus none in the last 7years of the prior administration. Our current govt is too busy with other things to take effective steps to prevent terrorism, apparently.

Roissy is so right. Party on dude. This party can’t last much longer. I hope Roissy writes his memoirs, to help future historians piece together the explanation of our civilization’s collapse.

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 9:04 am joel

To The King,

Blond hair is recessive, meaning that each parent could carry a gene for blond hair but could have brown hair themselves.

Also, it is quite common for babies to have light hair which darkens with age. Eye color is more reliable, since you can’t dye your eyes, and eye color doesn’t change much with age.

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 10:00 am Gil

Of course, it’s a picture of a Beta helping to raise an Alpha’s baby – the baby has a bigger package than him!

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 10:01 am Mthson

I hope this beta’s long-underwear has a “rear access” opening in the back. That would be the only way to redeem himself.

(His wife’s only opens in the front, unfortunately.)

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 10:12 am Willard Libby

roissy

look at the sack on that kid. no wonder he’s chilling like he owns christmas.

Gil
…– the baby has a bigger package than him!

Why are you guys having sexual fantasies about the size of an infants genitalia?

The baby boy is wearing diapers under his pjs. So if you guys want to get a bigger “sack/package” try some Huggies.

The dad looks like a fag and might just be a friend of the woman and not the baby’s father.

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 11:33 am UB

my initial feeling is confirmed by other people’s comments – that ain’t his kid

she’s loving it, the kid’s loving it, but i can see the bored look in that dude’s face. he’s been dragged there, put himself into this situation through capitulation, and he knows it. his smile doesn’t match his eyes, i think he’s painfully aware of his current life situation. and such an oestrogen-fuelled pose, wtf??

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 12:10 pm yclept

mama cougar has claws

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 12:43 pm Anonymous

My immeadiate thought was this particular pose was done as a joke.

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 12:44 pm Anonymous

the kid is alpha the dude is beta
straight up

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 1:23 pm bobby creme

Painful to see…

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 2:30 pm Gregory Magarshak

[b]how do you make bold[/b]

[q]how do you make quotes?[/q]

SOMEONE TELL ME

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 3:54 pm Anonymous

Roissy, I hope that ain’t you, because the kid don’t look like that dude. (Of course, if you’re NOT but it still IS your kid, props to ya!)

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 4:04 pm nexus

Interesting. I think of the red union suit as being outdoor working wear, I like to wear them under clothing when I work outside all day or go shooting in the Colorado winter. But somehow I don’t think this fellow has spent a day outside in his life.

I also think if he ditched the earring (can’t tell if it’s right ear only or both from the pic) and the hair mousse it would be a good thing for him.

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 4:23 pm gunslingergregi

Go to the about section greg.

The answer is there.

That pic is some kind of freakshow.

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 6:41 pm P

Wow. The men who joined are sad. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Guys-who-actually-care-about-Girls/243980489045

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 7:07 pm Me2

Wow, P
What’s even more sad is the guy who actually looks at these groups just to call the other guys sad so that he can feel accomplished. P is obviously for Pathetic.

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 7:46 pm Advocatus Diaboli

Another drunk woman laying false charges.. still want to marry?
____________________________________
http://www.tmz.com/2009/12/26/charlie-sheen-brooke-mueller-domestic-abuse-alcohol-a-factor-arrest-aspen-colorado-blood-alcohol-test-legally-drunk-two-and-a-half-man/

Law enforcement sources tell TMZ … Brooke Mueller was legally drunk when she called 911 on Charlie Sheen … and, we’ve learned, Brooke has fessed up that her allegation was phony.

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 10:01 pm Jane Bond

see more deMotivational Posters

LikeLike
on December 26, 2009 at 10:02 pm Jane Bond

http://verydemotivational.com/2009/11/14/cake/

Horrifying wedding pic.

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 1:12 am Rush

Lady “Slut” R got owned!

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 6:26 am The_King

@ Joel

Yes that is why one of the parents must have blond or ginger hair the kid to be born with the kind of color. If the baby was his then the kid would have brown hair not blond or light. Oh well it doesn’t matter there are clearly other indicators that show that the baby isn’t his. Nose structure and facial construction gives it away also.

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 12:14 pm joel

That wedding picture is horrifying. Massive obesity is a disease. Think diabetes, heart disease, and osteoarthritis. Think about bad circulation in the legs and gangrenous toes. Not to mention fungus infections in all those rolls of fat.

Now, I am going to be mean. PICTURE THEM HAVING SEX.

That was mean. I’ll have to get drunker than usual the next time I have sex to blot out that image.

And, under any proposed health care plan, “we” would be forced to pay for her (and his) health care bill related to their massive obesity.

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 12:34 pm gig

You must be a black guy with no standards

HA !!!!!

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 2:06 pm anoukange

‘look at the sack on that kid. no wonder he’s chilling like he owns christmas.”

-That’s a wet diaper bulge

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 2:06 pm anoukange

oops…Tarl got it too.

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 2:37 pm Anonymous

Advocatus Diaboli:
>>>
Another drunk woman laying false charges.. still want to marry?
____________________________________
http://www.tmz.com/2009/12/26/charlie-sheen-brooke-mueller-domestic-abuse-alcohol-a-factor-arrest-aspen-colorado-blood-alcohol-test-legally-drunk-two-and-a-half-man/

Law enforcement sources tell TMZ … Brooke Mueller was legally drunk when she called 911 on Charlie Sheen … and, we’ve learned, Brooke has fessed up that her allegation was phony.
>>>

Well, you can’t bet Charlie Sheen won’t be into getting married again any time soon after this.

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 4:31 pm Anonymous

that kids alpha.

hes got that whole “i run this photoshoot” type of shit going on.

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 4:37 pm LILGRL

The_King

It’s time to brush up on your bio, homeslice.

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 4:44 pm gunslingergregi

If she lied she should get the hellraiser treatment.

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 7:38 pm msexceptiontotherule

He must have just ended his probation on the last case he had with domestic dispute charges against him.

Don’t worry, Robert Downey Jr. will be picked up outside of a dive motel in an alley with more drugs than a pharmacist pretty soon.

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 8:22 pm Anonymous

it could be a diaper not his ball sack

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 8:54 pm a very attractive woman

roissy you posted this picture last year or the year before. You keep changing back to the same thing.

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 11:13 pm brightstormyday

Some of the fan photos from that facebook group are pretty awesome.

I can’t tell if this one is supposed to make nice guys look good or not. I think it was trying to, and it failed.

How to spot a nice guy:
He looks like a total LOSER!

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 11:46 pm P

@Me2

Your logic doesn’t follow. Get at me when you can contribute, hater.

LikeLike
on December 27, 2009 at 11:46 pm Advocatus Diaboli

Governor Resigns After Broadcast of Sex Tape

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126189843177406217.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

HYDERABAD, India — The 86-year-old governor of a southern Indian state resigned, a day after a television news channel broadcast a tape allegedly showing him in bed with three women.

Pressure mounted on Gov. Narain Dutt Tiwari to quit after the tape allegedly showing him in bed with three women was broadcast Friday, prompting the opposition and women’s right groups to hold street protests in Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh’s state capital, demanding his resignation.

LikeLike
on December 28, 2009 at 7:07 am JB

“Merry Christmas!

Yes.”

I think I have a psychic gift — I got 4 out of 4.

LikeLike
on December 28, 2009 at 11:41 am dick fuel

looks like that douchefarm got a hot wife for christmas

but if she didn’t cuckold… no… she cuckolded.

LikeLike
on December 28, 2009 at 1:26 pm Jane Bond

http://chickwhisperer.blogspot.com/

Hilarious PUA spoof.

LikeLike
on December 28, 2009 at 2:54 pm GayButtox

Did gig just admit that he is a black guy, and that is the reason for his low standards?

LikeLike
on December 28, 2009 at 2:55 pm Firepower

black guys have high standards – look at Eldrick Woods

LikeLike
on December 28, 2009 at 4:30 pm Cannon's Canon

or ‘A Pimp Named Slickback’

LikeLike
on December 28, 2009 at 6:13 pm Gregory Magarshak

Roissy – I think you are just not familiar with the Bro Code:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_P_BEW8dOvY 🙂

LikeLike
on December 28, 2009 at 8:00 pm The_King

@LILGRL

No, I’m really not into science and math like your nerdy AZN self.

I’m more into Cuban cigars, drugs, guns and BMWs, which I guarantee I know better than anyone here. Good day.

LikeLike
on December 28, 2009 at 9:16 pm HUNGRY HUNGRY HIPPOS

“P
Wow. The men who joined are sad. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Guys-who-actually-care-about-Girls/243980489045”

hahaha holy shit, one of my facebook friends, the biggest omega I’ve ever known in my life, is in that group. He is also a leader in the young democrats at his college and an outspoken swpler/feminist/liberal.

LikeLike
on December 28, 2009 at 11:16 pm LILGRL

K–

I’m more into Cuban cigars, drugs, guns and BMWs, which I guarantee I know better than anyone here. Good day.

O RLY.

Obvs, you haven’t met THE G MANIFESTO.

LikeLike
on December 29, 2009 at 3:06 am unlearning genius

“Wow. The men who joined are sad. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Guys-who-actually-care-about-Girls/243980489045”

hahaha holy shit, one of my facebook friends, the biggest omega I’ve ever known in my life, is in that group. He is also a leader in the young democrats at his college and an outspoken swpler/feminist/liberal.”

Not so fast bro. You see tactics like these can be very effective. Although masculine guys like us would feel revulsion towards things like these. Psychological femininity in men actually works when you do it en masse like this guy (all pop stars sing beta songs all day). The art lies in mixing a sufficient amount of emotional distance while affecting a heightened emotional display. Of course if you are just a follower you are an omega and thank god darwin is dealing with you. Sure beats dressing up like a hermaphrodite, painting one’s nails and all that crap if you ask me. A man should never stoop down to that extent for pussy. But then, to each his own i guess.

LikeLike
on December 29, 2009 at 3:53 am JB

Are you guys sure that’s not an ironic group?

LikeLike
on December 29, 2009 at 7:56 am bobbyG

maybe it’s just the chick’s gay brother home for the holidays, thus the gay uncle theory is the one i find most believable

LikeLike
on December 29, 2009 at 11:03 pm Racer X

Got to love the expression on that kid’s face…

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 1:14 am haha

get back to blogging you lazy fuck, god knows you havent spent this down time in church

-testing your game results

-alpha assessments

-female ratings

-BETA OF THE YEARRRRR

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 7:51 am The_King_Rulez

I have mad GTA skillz, yo.

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 8:59 am bobo

Sweet Dee Is Dating A Retarded Person

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 12:46 pm Grind

That picture is hilarious, but the humor is diminished by the comments demonstrating a grossly misinformed knowledge of genetics (esp about “dominant” and “recessive” genes, where people seem to think that some genes have bigger muscles and always win the fight).

Two brown haired people can have a kid with red or blond hair. Two white people can have a black kid. Two black people could have a white kid. In each case with the appropriate ancestry to support that possibility.

I’m a guy with brown hair, with a wife with brown hair. I have a son with red hair. While I enjoy the “ha ha, mailman have red hair?” comments, or more commonly the knowing smirks, I am quite certain the child is mine. My father had blazing red hair, as an aside (it comes out in bright red stubble on me), while my wife has several red-headed cousins. Such is the nature of recessive genes.

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 1:13 pm Seeking Alpha

@ Grind

Have him tested yet?

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 1:22 pm Grind

@Seeking,

I don’t need to. He looks so much like my father it is spooky. I look like my mother (insomuch as an alpha could).

I’d worry about my wife cavorting with my father, but for the fact that he’s been dead for over a decade.

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 3:30 pm Gunslingergregi

””””””””LILGRL
K–

I’m more into Cuban cigars, drugs, guns and BMWs, which I guarantee I know better than anyone here. Good day.

O RLY.

Obvs, you haven’t met THE G MANIFESTO.
””””””””

Hey you can take the cigars drugs and bmw’s but yea we do seem to have some pretty good depth on this site as far as people who have done everything. Makes it cool.

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 4:23 pm Gunslingergregi

Plus I found out I can make babies yay!

So the hundred kids in the plan are possible.

“goes to vomit”

he he he

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 4:25 pm Gunslingergregi

What a christmas.

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 5:05 pm Cannon's Canon

great catch bobo, lil kevin in the house with his little hand

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 5:44 pm Caligula

BOTM candidate

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1239441/Outlook-bright-U-S-weather-girl-accepts-boyfriends-proposal-live-air.html

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 5:57 pm Puma

Guys – Happy 2008!

No I didn’t do any time travel this morning. I am referring to the latest US Marriage Rate statistic, this time with 2008 data, released by the National Marriage Project last month.

In one year alone, 2007–>2008, the US “new-marriage” (i.e. wedding) rate went down from 39.2 to 37.4. Almost two basis points in only one year! Put this in perspective of the rate back in 1970 of 76.5. The decline was edging along at an average speed of 1 basis-point/year these last four decades. Now it is gathering steam with 2 basis-points/year.

The Marriage Strike has now passed the halfway mark. Half the women who would have otherwise hitched husbands back in 1970 WILL NOT, statistically speaking, find any husbands 2008 onwards. The Marriage Strike is not only alive and well, it is roaring on like the great Niagara Falls !!!!!!

The full year by year chart of the ongoing four decade crash, now with 2008 data, can be seen on page 64 of this year’s report:

http://www.virginia.edu/marriageproject/pdfs/Union_11_25_09.pdf

Keep in mind these numbers are not the total “presently married” rate, but the rate of “weddings per unmarried women per year”. I.e. 1/27 for 2008 means that only 1 out of 27 unmarried chicks got hitched that year. The other 26 chicks were sh*** out of luck.

Back in 1970, 1 out 13 unmarried women were able to get hitched that year (in the middle of the Vietnam War no less), and only 12 had to wait for their chance next year.

The data tell us that the odds of the Anual Marriage Lotto are getting longer and longer. 1/13 was decent odds. 1/27 is starting to stink … that is if you are a girl waiting for “her big day”. 🙂

Note: Starting this year, they have moved the National Marriage Project over to the better funded and more prestigous University of Virgina. (Rutgers U. we hardly knew ye!)

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 6:08 pm The_King

@LILGRL

I know G he’s a good source. Still…

1. Me
2. G

Mayb u can incorporate sum of his stuff 2 make ur blg readable or kool AZN. 😛

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 6:09 pm Gunslingergregi

Amazing how fast ya can go pro choice with 21 years of paperwork on the horizon.

Sorry little johnny.

“clear”

“suction vacuum”

check

“coat hanger”

check

all right lets get this over with.

The doctor was like congrats your pregnant.

I told the doc to go get a coat hanger.

Is that alpha lol

He was like thems fighting words.

he he he

LikeLike
on December 30, 2009 at 10:19 pm Mr. Dithers

Whoa…at first I thought this might be Roissy with an old girlfriend.

LikeLike
on December 31, 2009 at 12:11 pm The truth

I’m Dre from back in the day from
NSA from black and the grey from
chokin a bitch to smackin her face from

LikeLike
on December 31, 2009 at 1:53 pm Anonymous

Word, dog!

LikeLike
on December 31, 2009 at 2:12 pm Anonymouses Anonymous

You got it all wrong. The wife is lying to the husband. She claims it is his kid. In reality, that is Baby Herman.

LikeLike
on December 31, 2009 at 4:03 pm Gunslingergregi

Well gonna see if woman spontaneously abort when drunk as fuck tonight. Should be interesting see if we can see a nice size blood clot in the toilet in the new year.

LikeLike
on December 31, 2009 at 4:05 pm Gunslingergregi

Ok that was pretty nasty. lol

LikeLike
on December 31, 2009 at 5:22 pm aoefe

@Gunny – Well gonna see if woman spontaneously abort when drunk as fuck tonight.

Or maybe, must maybe you’ll end up with a baby with a nice case of FASD – Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder. Pregnant women shouldn’t drink. I deal with their off-spring – just sayin…

LikeLike
on December 31, 2009 at 5:34 pm aoefe

*JUST maybe (crap I hate when I do that)

LikeLike
on December 31, 2009 at 8:19 pm Gunslingergregi

Well if that doesn’t happen it is hanger time dun nuh nuh nuh na na na na

Just testing the drunk thing first lol

LikeLike
on December 31, 2009 at 9:40 pm Gunslingergregi

Well yea if the wife gets preggers no drinking no smoking all that good stuff but your crazy if you think I am gonna have a kid in the us unless it is one hell of a special woman.

LikeLike
on December 31, 2009 at 10:13 pm brightstormyday

@Puma:
“Keep in mind these numbers are not the total “presently married” rate, but the rate of “weddings per unmarried women per year”. I.e. 1/27 for 2008 means that only 1 out of 27 unmarried chicks got hitched that year. The other 26 chicks were sh*** out of luck.

Back in 1970, 1 out 13 unmarried women were able to get hitched that year (in the middle of the Vietnam War no less), and only 12 had to wait for their chance next year.

The data tell us that the odds of the Anual Marriage Lotto are getting longer and longer. 1/13 was decent odds. 1/27 is starting to stink … that is if you are a girl waiting for “her big day”.”

Are those the odds of women in general? I know a number of girls who don’t want to marry. I know a number of others that are waiting until their 30’s/40’s.

I think if girls actually put marriage as a priority younger, then those rates would be a bit higher. I wonder if they have the rates of the number of men that proposed that year. It’d be interesting to see how many men are getting rejected.

LikeLike
on January 1, 2010 at 12:12 am Math Wiz

“In one year alone, 2007–>2008, the US “new-marriage” (i.e. wedding) rate went down from 39.2 to 37.4. Almost two basis points in only one year!”

2 basis points = 0.2%

DUMBASS

LikeLike
on January 1, 2010 at 1:38 am GayButtox

aoefebuttox,

Your application has been approved. It will be your honor and goal on New Years Eve to :

11:00 PM : Fix me a drink
11:59:59 PM….

…..(as the ball drops on Time’s Square)……

Detox my Buttox…

LikeLike
on January 1, 2010 at 9:10 am Anonymous

A little late, but…

How is Santa different from Tiger Woods? Santa stops at three HOs!

LikeLike
on January 1, 2010 at 1:17 pm Advocatus Diaboli

start your new year with a depressing post..

http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/01/01/agent-smith-why-do-you-persist/

LikeLike
on January 1, 2010 at 5:58 pm Advocatus Diaboli

Oh ya.. and something else. In any case, it is a slow news day.

How to Use Escorts- II

http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/01/01/how-to-use-escorts-02/

LikeLike
on January 1, 2010 at 9:32 pm yclept

I think Roissy has eloped with a lawyer.

LikeLike
on January 1, 2010 at 10:44 pm DCLXVI

Divorce Rate 75.54% in California!!!

By David J. Stewart

Matthew 7:2, “For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.”

Divorce is a horrible sin which God hates. Nearly everyone who files for divorce blames their spouse, which is rooted in the sin of self-righteousness.

Divorces Figures for California:

Year, CA Div., L.A. Div., CA Mar., Divorce %
1996 169,416 38,026 219,039 77.35%
1997 165,547 37,501 237,669 69.65%
1998 161,905 35,706 194,108 83.41%
2000 156,078 36,551 196,896 79.27%
2001 154,672 38,850 224,241 68.98%
2002 160,854 40,468 217,880 73.83%
2003 148,511 38,811 194,914 76.19%

Average Divorce Rate: 75.54%**

**Reference: Court Statistics Reports for 1996-2004.

The divorce rate in California is 75.54 percent!!!

According to Matthew 7:2, God will judge husbands and wives by the same measure by which they judge each other. When a person divorces, magnifying the faults of their spouse in an attempt to justify a divorce, they’re bringing God’s judgment upon them self. They have shown no mercy and God will judge them the same, without mercy. This is what the Word of God teaches. Divorce is a sin that perpetuates for a lifetime, thus God will return harsh judgment accordingly to those who break their marriage vows and quit. Don’t you tell me that God permits a divorce when one’s spouse is begging for mercy and doesn’t want a divorce. I am tired of Christian leaders teaching that it’s ok to divorce when Jesus plainly taught forgiveness 70 times 7 (Matthew 18:22).

Feminism is the main cause of divorce in America, which is why there are several million divorced women in the their twenties with 3 or 4 children. American women have become intolerable to live with, filled with selfish pride. If you’re a woman and are angry at what I just said, then you’re proving my point. It begins with young girls being horribly influenced by reprobate idols such as the contemptible Hannah Montana (real name: Miley Cyrus). Hannah Montana is rude, crude and lewd. She’s a spoiled American brat, as are many teens today. She is the shameful disgrace that the New World Order wants children to become. 2nd Timothy 3:2 foretold that children would become disobedient to parents in the Last Days. CBC News reported in April of 2009 that a 12-year old spoiled brat sued her dad after he grounded her and she won the court case. Shame on her.

It is nauseating what many women today have deteriorated into, largely because of the influence of feminism. The American feminist culture is a terminal disease to society. California leads the way in moral rot, feminism, liberal agendas, homosexuality, wacko environmental laws, the highest prison population, scams, false prophets, cults and sadly, divorce. I say this kindly, but to America’s shame. No wonder California has been nicknamed by many as “The Granola State,” i.e., the land of fruits and nuts. Hollyweird has even made a creepy show called “Californication” glorifying the sin of adultery. The city of San FranSICKO has passed Affirmative Action laws requiring the hiring of at least 20% of homosexuals for all city jobs. No such quota exists for Christians. I think Lex Luthor was on to something when he wanted to nuke the San Andreas’ fault line and plunge California into the Pacific Ocean. Curse you Superman!

More at… http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Divorce/california.htm

LikeLike
on January 1, 2010 at 11:52 pm a very attractive woman

Gunslinger

Well yea if the wife gets preggers no drinking no smoking all that good stuff but your crazy if you think I am gonna have a kid in the us unless it is one hell of a special woman.

This reminds me of the man who was looking for the perfect woman and after many, many years of searching finally found two. The only problem was they were looking for perfect men.

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 1:11 am Gunslingergregi

Well it is a good thing that woman I am with do consider me the perfect man and thank god in their prayers that they met me.

The problem with that scenerio is that the woman where looking for perfect men not a man he he he

So they weren’t the right ones for him obviously and therefore not perfect for him.

I have come to believe that perfect woman are created. I spent the time going through experiences in life with my wife over 5 years and she is the perfect woman for me. I found one. Yay!
She doesn’t live in us and I will be moving with her soon and trying to make some babies.

Just I was in us on a extended leave of sorts and took that time to conduct an experiment on my hypothesis that anyone can be rich. So I have taken this chick under my wing to kind of help me pass the time and has internalized my vision of how to be free. Sure she listens well cooks good. I just don’t love her so will not be including her in my family. Ya really can’t make yourself love someone else. I mean I can love her as a person and want to see her succeed. Which she is doing. She now has two jobs working her ass off and gonna be saving loot to buy her first house cash. So yea proving my theory that anyone can become rich. Which my definition would be financially independant with basically no bills. Told her from beginning I was married and would be leaving. She is even throwing me a going away party. She also has a husband. Kind of highlights the diference in seeing other people for men and woman. She tells me she loves me and has lost her love for her husband and crap like that. I tell her I love my wife.
Wild shit really.

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 2:05 am 3point5

Dammit!!! Get off vacation Roissy!! I have to work an extra 8 minutes every day you don’t post!!

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 10:02 am The_King

Holy Christ Roissy hurry up and update. You don’t seem to be the family type, so I’m assuming you’re just being lazy.

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 4:39 pm Rain And

New York Times article about how male novelists keep getting more and more beta.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/books/review/Roiphe-t.html

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 4:57 pm Advocatus Diaboli

A lyrical autopsy..

http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/01/02/lyrical-autopsy-golddigger-by-kanye-west/

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 5:42 pm Anonymous

Rain And said:
>>>
New York Times article about how male novelists keep getting more and more beta.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/books/review/Roiphe-t.html
>>>

Oh, dang straight! In hard-hittin’ drama, I want to read some strong raunchy f*ckin’ by the characters, not some left/liberal juvenile wussiness. Damn, real life was badder-ass in junior high than some of this crap written by… oh, wait, some (most) of these author ARE wussy “emo” boys from the ‘burbs. No wonder.

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 5:49 pm Anonymous

Also: The Futurist speaks da truth!

“The Misandry Bubble”
http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html

From its summary: “The Western World has quietly become a civilization that undervalues men and overvalues women, where the state forcibly transfers resources from men to women creating various perverse incentives for otherwise good women to conduct great evil against men and children, and where male nature is vilified but female nature is celebrated. …”

Check it out!

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 7:19 pm uri

That guy looks like he makes his wife wear a strapon.

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 7:56 pm DCLXVI

A SCANTILY-clad girl lies sprawled semi-conscious in the snow early yesterday as the UK celebrated New Year with yet another night of drunken shame.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2790647/Hardy-Brits-defy-chill-in-2010.html

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 8:41 pm Pupu

Happy New Year!

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 8:49 pm RedorDead

Typical UK slut with Pete Docherty wanabee bf – christ this country makes me want to vomit the contents of my overpaid well-fed stomach. No surprise there, even a theta man wouldn’t touch it with yours, there’s chlamydia written all over those nasty Miss Selfridge shoes.

Just a polite request to lose that extremely disturbing Xmas photo that greets me every time I log on to this newly discovered source of wisdom. I don’t know which image disturbs me more…

LikeLike
on January 2, 2010 at 10:14 pm Dylan

Why the brits so ugly? Bad skin, bad hair, bad teeth. Terrible accents.

There are exceptions, of course. I can think of one or two attractive British girls e.g. Cheryl Cole, Kate Beckinsale. Though there’s definitely a trend toward ugliness among the population. But why?

LikeLike
on January 3, 2010 at 12:11 am Rich Fader

“Yeah, I know. I’m ugly and I looked stupid even BEFORE I put on the long-handles. But my girl is hot and my kid’s hung like a mule. How YOU livin’?”

LikeLike
on January 3, 2010 at 1:14 am Puma

Math Wiz. Read the goddamn report first. 39.2 & 37.4 are per 1000.

LikeLike
on January 3, 2010 at 4:10 am Advocatus Diaboli

Part III of ‘How to Use Escorts’ is now up.

http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/how-to-use-escorts-03/

LikeLike
on January 3, 2010 at 4:43 am JB

Hey all,

Read the Futurist article linked above if you haven’t yet. It is rather comprehensive, and he links Roissy. Since Instapundit has linked it, there’s a good possibility this stuff is merely 6 months from going mainstream.

LikeLike
on January 3, 2010 at 5:57 am V K

I thought people on this forum would be interested in seeing this…

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1127364

Wow just wow. I can imagine Roissy’s head exploding after he reads all that haha.

LikeLike
on January 3, 2010 at 9:14 am The_King

Easiest abortion? Alcohol and jacuzzi.

LikeLike
on January 3, 2010 at 6:36 pm Advocatus Diaboli

Playing myself..

http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/01/03/like-being-a-mark-01/

LikeLike
on January 3, 2010 at 8:02 pm Brad

Beta of the year contest?

LikeLike
on January 4, 2010 at 2:03 am HughRistik

Dear Roissy,

I’ve read your blog off-and-on for a couple years, and lately you’ve been saying some stuff about about women that’s sounds a bit violent and over-the-top. And unfortunately, since your blog is such a prominent place for discussion of pickup outside the seduction community, a lot of people are reading your stuff and thinking that PUAs in general think it’s cool to hit their girlfriends.

As I’ve studied pickup and seduction for around 7 years, I always find it annoying when people jump to conclusions about pickup when they don’t really know anything about it. I like to talk sense into them… but I don’t appreciate you making my job difficult by giving outsiders a skewed impression of the community and making it look like pickup involves violence.

In Hitting a Woman Will Turn Her On, you tell a story of hitting a woman and say that she “deserved it.” In that post, it sounded like you were saying that it could be acceptable to hit women.

What is your current opinion on the subject? Do you think that it can be acceptable to hit women, or are you just descriptively saying that hitting some women will turn them on? Why, or why not?

It may be true that hitting some women will turn them on, but there’s no reason to believe that women in general are into that. And even if a woman might be into it, that doesn’t make it OK to just spring it on her without consent. There’s a bunch of stuff I like girls doing, like, say, really hard biting… but if a girl just did it without clearing it with me first, I would be pissed.

In another post you say:

Cum in her mouth and hold it closed until she swallows it. Also known as: Pair bonding.

Certain people trying to discredit you are saying in this quote that you are “inciting violence.” But I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt, because it would be kinda monstrous to nonconsensually hold someone’s mouth closed to make them swallow cum, and I think you’re an asshole, not a monster:

– Are you serious in that quote, or are you just joking around?
– If so, are you advocating doing this behavior in a context of consensual dominance towards the woman, or not?

If you would publicly clarify your positions on these subjects, then you could save yourself from some potentially unfair criticism (I say “potentially unfair,” because since I don’t know your actual views until you clarify, I can’t say whether the criticism is fair or not). Otherwise, someone reading your blog could take those quotes seriously and go do something fucked-up to some girl. Also, you’re making game look bad, which does a big disservice to anyone who studies game and isn’t into the whole violence against women thing.

LikeLike
on January 4, 2010 at 2:35 am Cannon's Canon

LikeLike
on January 4, 2010 at 11:19 am SFG

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/magazine/articles/2010/01/03/loves_new_frontier/?page=full

What do you think of this? PC as all hell, but he’s banging two women. That’s pretty alpha…

LikeLike
on January 4, 2010 at 2:25 pm Anonymous

Irrelevant but very strange…

Where are all the emancipated folk?

LikeLike
on January 4, 2010 at 5:27 pm chic noir

*chic noir looks at the pealing paint on the wall of alpha wing*

So did R just up and abandon the chateau?

My toilet has been backed up for a week. Someone call the plumber.

LikeLike
on January 4, 2010 at 6:43 pm xxx

Roissy sure likes his Christmases.

Hey I like them too, but today is Jan.4, a Monday, everybody get back to work, goddammit.

LikeLike
on January 4, 2010 at 6:49 pm Anon

Did a Feminister finally catch up with Roissy and kill (or worse, betaize) him? He’s been might quiet.

LikeLike
on January 4, 2010 at 6:51 pm lurker

Who’s the fag in the pj’s? Zunder?

LikeLike
on January 4, 2010 at 10:47 pm JB

“But my girl is hot and my kid’s hung like a mule. How YOU livin’”

Do we know that it’s HIS kid? I don’t see a striking resemblance.

LikeLike
on January 4, 2010 at 11:34 pm el chief

In case anyone is bored, due to Roissy’s disappearance, I have some new posts on my blog:

http://vancouvergame.blogspot.com/

happy kwanza!

el chief

LikeLike
on January 4, 2010 at 11:46 pm el chief

re NY Times, I nominated (via roissymail) Chabon as Beta of the Year

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 12:57 am whiskey

Where is Roissy! We want Roissy!

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 1:12 am BizzyBrain

Great photo! But it has to be a prank.

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 7:42 am Horatio Sanchez

Get better soon, Roissy!

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 7:51 am PA

The kid is probably his. Both have that Sean-Pennish “squinty” face. And their ears stick out similarly. Both are redheads too, despite the mom’s darker features. The boy’s hair will darken with childhood to match the dad’s.

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 12:14 pm On second thought

“A Wanton Woman’s Ways Revealed, 71 Years Later”
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/09/movies/09kehr.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print&position=

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 12:21 pm gig

The kid is probably his

“probably”

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 3:55 pm Cerberus

So did Roissy get hit by a bus, or did I miss a memo somewhere? Seems like an awful long time between posts.

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 6:55 pm Nate

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/books/review/Roiphe-t.html?pagewanted=1

Look at this amusing article by a feminist “cultural critic” who admits that her fellow crones ruined modern literature by turning exciting male writers into a bunch of mild, neutered betas who are eager not to offend women with their sexual energy.

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 8:03 pm Anonymous

New York Beta Times faces the music:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/05/health/05weight.html?em

Roissy, are you done with this blog?

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 8:45 pm Cannon's Canon

tiger uppercut!

http://www.nj.com/devils/index.ssf/2010/01/former_nj_devils_coach_and_ex-.html

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 9:15 pm Gunslingergregi

Dang golf club meet face. Lucky tiger didn’t die.

Maybe he will toss some money towards some issues in regards to men and woman.

LikeLike
on January 5, 2010 at 9:38 pm Cannon's Canon

doing a bit of web searching, it seems this account is being called into question. the faggots over at deadspin (under the gawker/jezebel umbrella) dismiss it because… get this… minor, ornate details sync up from multiple random sources.

if these details are proven true, they will only serve to confirm my suspicions. the dishonest reporting and triumphant white knighting are the shockers, but even that must be expected.

if tiger really got clocked in the face without warning by a nine iron, pretty lies will perish, and that is my rooting interest.

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 11:36 am Hardcore

where roissy at?

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 1:09 pm lurker

I was told that Deadspin was the snarky, smarmy sports site that let it all hang out—nailing athletes to the wall with humor in the way ESPN and SI wouldn’t.

Then I read it. What it basically is is left-wing, Daily Show style attack the white athlete bullshit. You’ll note they bestow derogatory nicknames and viciously attack white athletes/coaches at a rate 95% of black athletes/coaches. Adn of course preaching tolerance and diversity, etc. I wouldn’t be surprised if one of their guys wrote fucking Avatar.

The saddest was when they ran a full article denouncing people who made jokes about OK city’s new basketball team–jokes relating to crime rates going up. Deadspin even claimed, through quotes, that somehow a bunch of ganster-thugs visiting one elementary school for a day to “promote reading” somehow makes up for 364 days of anti-social behavior.

I’m not surprised that crap is held by the Gawker pussies. Fucking liberal asshats.

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 1:31 pm Sal Paradise

Roissy, come back. The world isn’t the same without your blogging.

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 1:37 pm Firepower

lurker

I was told that Deadspin was the snarky, smarmy sports site that let it all hang out…

Then I read it. What it basically is is left-wing, Daily Show style attack the white athlete bullshit.

Same old – same old. Much like Bill Maher’s Politically Incorrect was anything but.

Been going on for years.

Media will resist to the end
goring its own
sacred cows

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 2:49 pm Paul

this post is really old. could we have another post ffs

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 3:13 pm MNL

@HughRistik

If you would publicly clarify your positions on these subjects, then you could save yourself from some potentially unfair criticism (I say “potentially unfair,” because since I don’t know your actual views until you clarify, I can’t say whether the criticism is fair or not). Otherwise, someone reading your blog could take those quotes seriously and go do something fucked-up to some girl.

You don’t really believe this do you?

I’m not trying to defend Roissy’s posts here but merely to say that some of those most vocal in their “unfair criticism” have already made up their minds about “game”–and either disbelieve it or, more accurately, don’t want to believe it. Roissy’s tongue-in-cheek comments you mention are not the foundation of Roissy’s critics. These Roissy comments are merely a convenient handle for generating social support for their coincident agenda. It’s a tool to marginalize what they don’t want to admit to themselves or allow others to recognize, i.e., that game works. The agenda of most Roissy’s critics is to preserve the status quo of a beta-ized manosphere and Roissy is causing them some cognitive dissonance. (Read Gramsci.)

Furthermore, Roissy’s attempt to clarify a “position” that should already be clear would have no positive impact and would only serve to validate that which critics have already assumed, i.e., if the defendant feels the need to clarify what he said, then what he said was necessarily unclear and incorrect to begin with!

Second… The day, “someone reading your blog could take those quotes seriously and go do something fucked-up to some girl”…should be handled the way anyone who fucks-up should handled. Again, tongue-in-cheek blog comments offer neither the permission nor authority to violate common sense and the legal space of others. (This is where I wonder if you’re trolling.) I would question the IQ of anyone who reads tongue-in-cheek blog comments and takes it to justify exerting violence against another. Such a person likely had problems or motives long before the blog arrived.

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 3:37 pm Bobito

Feminists re-invented the word “abuse” to mean anything from yelling at your wife to hitting her. France has taken this one step further… now yelling at your wife can land you in jail.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1240770/France-introduce-new-law-banning-psychological-violence-marriages.html

Sheer brilliance!

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 4:00 pm Cannon's Canon

deadspin used to be cool.

i think the turn was when their old editor will leach moved on. they eliminated the classic meme in the comments of “yes, yes, no, yes, yes” for pictures of an athlete surrounded by four women. hey, that one still kills me every time.

the prominent feature writer now is named “dashiell”. sounds like a black woman, writes like a black woman… but he LOOKS like a murray hill big ten graduate. what a fucking douche.

“kissing suzy kolber” is a tolerable website for gloves-off sports snark. of course, the occasional white man’s burden slips in, red states and republicans are mocked every so often, and the commenters are all liberal fags.

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 4:25 pm gunslingergregi

”””””I wouldn’t be surprised if one of their guys wrote fucking Avatar. ””””””’

Avatar was fucking retarded. At the end lining up the guys that have freaking helicopters with missles and acting like they won by hitting the things with arrows. Now the realistic part was when they blew up the fucking tree and laughed as arrows hit the windscreen. What they didn’t show at end is when the second wave of attack came in that was more than 10 ships and blew the savages all to kingdom come. Retarded shit.

Now the marine wanting to go to the other side I can believe. All he had to do was be tough and he got some nice fresh pussy and a woman who was actually tough not just able to talk tough. While back at the marine camp all he got was some chick that acted in aliens before treating everyone like a piece of crap and beneath her because she was just that tough of a talker anyway.

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 4:26 pm me me me

WE WANT ROISSY! WE WANT ROISSY! WE WANT ROISSY! I WANT ROISSY!

Post something new!!!! I hate looking at ugly men in their ginch.

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 4:28 pm gunslingergregi

Best part was when weaver died at the end so she couldn’t spread her fake ass form of womanhood to the savages. he he he

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 4:45 pm gunslingergregi

Although the savages actually had a culture and companionship and fun. The marine culture all they had was their work and a class system based on what school you went to.

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 7:58 pm mongo

This photo doesn’t look real to me. The guy’s face and pose don’t match the body. My first impression was that this is one of those pictures where the original faces have been replaced.

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 9:15 pm Advocatus Diaboli

Since nobody is updating.. might just plug my new post..

http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/how-to-use-escorts-04/

LikeLike
on January 6, 2010 at 11:08 pm Whatever

Avatar blows!

…. and James Cameron drinks loads. No one will watch this movie ever again once its out of the theater because there are better storylines in a sega gamegear game. He wastes my time with a lesson about conservation and life while he litters the world with cheap plastic glasses…. and no matter what anyone says the blue dudes were without a doubt graphically raping terydactlys!!!

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 12:04 am The_King

I murked Roissy with my huge black anaconda and tea bagged him for shits and giggles.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 2:17 am Puma

We need more guys like this 80 year old Georgia man. He was still paying alimony to an ex-wife 38 years after the original divorce, and finally said enough is enough, I am not paying. The (female) judge said “If you stop paying, I will find you in contempt and send you to prison”. He said “Fine”.

http://jacksonville.com/news/columnists/….ut_of_principle

Wilkes gave Iannicelli until Dec. 14 to pay or go to jail. Not fazed by the deadline, Iannicelli surrendered three days after Christmas.

“It’s a matter of principle. I’m not going to give them a dime,” he said during an interview at his office weeks before he was jailed. “They can do whatever they want with me.

“I have a Greco-Roman background. Romans never surrender. We’ve been slaughtered several times in history,” he said.

If he expires in prison (he IS an old guy), the MRM must publicize this to the fullest extent.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 2:18 am Puma

Here is the link again …

http://jacksonville.com/news/columnists/terry_dickson/2010-01-07/story/he_went_to_jail_out_of_principle

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 3:05 am Cannon's Canon

look, global warming empathist (he tried his best to punk chris horner, to no avail) and elin woods apologist OR NOT… bill maher did actually suggest that american airports should pat down towelheads instead of white grandmas. THAT is politically incorrect!!!

an aside: those axe-wielding camel jockeys need to realize that they would inspire wayyyyyy more conscientiousness if they chopped up a late night host instead of a faceless dutch grandfather. for that matter, same effect with a “celeb-utante”… you know who they are.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 4:41 am Jack

Roissy where the fuck are you?

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 5:35 am gig

Avatar was fucking retarded

It was platonic masturbation for nerds.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 9:17 am firenerd

Mistah Roissy, he dead.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 11:37 am jackson

Maybe the man on the left is Roissy, and he just revealed this blog to be one long-running joke.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 1:41 pm Dave in Md

Shitslinger:

Thanks for the spoiler, asshole.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 2:09 pm Wheres D. Fag

Hey homo, why no updates? Is you be fuckin eastern european girls??? My baby daddy is all be trippin. No homo.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 2:56 pm $bag

mothafuckin roissy runnin pushpull blog game.

and yeah, that spoiler was some punk shit.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 3:28 pm gunslingergregi

”””””””’Dave in Md
Shitslinger:

Thanks for the spoiler, asshole.
””””””

I did you a favor he he he

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 4:57 pm lurker

gig: “It was platonic masturbation for nerds.”
—-correction: It was platonic masturbation for liberal, hate-whitey, america-is-evil nerds.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 5:00 pm lurker

bill maher’s only saving grace is that, in his contempt for humanity, he includes women. He severely doesn’t trust them, and has made comments as such—hence why he’s also pro-capital punishment—he doesn’t buy the womanish bullshit about saving the poor murderers.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 5:10 pm P. Orszag

I hear Roissy got married.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 5:25 pm totalong

Where the hell is roissy, Someone try posting some disturbing garbage to check if he is actually still moderating this blog.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 5:40 pm P-ROD

I hope this blog is not dead.

i would actually donate to keep it going or even buy his a book if this guy ever wrote one..

it is that good.

should i start archiving these posts or what?

some are gems.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 5:55 pm haha

He’s probably on vacation.

I have the whole thing archived in any event.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 7:08 pm thealchem1st

Clearly, Roissy is employing the 16th law of Robert Greene’s 48 Laws of Power: “Use absence to increase respect and honor.”

It appears to be working.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 8:01 pm aoefe

Feels like a graveyard around here. Hope he’s having a marvy darvy time while he keeps us all in suspense. Jeesh.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 9:47 pm TESTAN

LOL HE LUK DUM AMIRITE

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 9:52 pm anon

Looks like Roissy caught a case of oneitis!

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 10:12 pm Anonymous

Nice christmas card roissy!

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 10:13 pm Anonymous

Picture is actually roissy.

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 11:14 pm Starker

Regarding our missing host: His (presumed) name, address, place of work and photos have been posted by one of his deranged female commenters. Yeah, you’ve probably guessed which one. The lady has teamed with a domestic violence enforcer who says it is a matter for the police. The above post by HughRistic states some of the issues raised. They know where he works so they will make, or have made, a move there, as well. R is probably lawyering up right now. Be careful with your references, we don’t want more publicity for the bitch and her “outing.” Just thought you ought to know.
Starker

LikeLike
on January 7, 2010 at 11:45 pm yclept

I just knew that nut case would wreak havoc eventually.

Some people never get the joke.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 2:00 am Cannon's Canon

hughristic is a gender traitor.

as the current pulse of the insane women is not the efficacy of game, but the ethical consideration of “negs”… roissy will return to write a post about how superb and flawless negs are. he will provide five anecdotes of documented negging in the celebrity world and cite them as irrefutable evidence of the nature of women.

as a result, 50 women commenters will cross their proverbial arms and each give individual anecdotes of how they recognized a “neg” from some douchebag in a bar they met on a girls’ night out and threw their drinks in his face. one of these broads will self-select by continuing a ridiculous flurry of stream-of-consciousness rant comments. roissy will respond in bold underneath her comments to her bullshit with a progressively snarky undressing, demeaning the girl in a systemic manner. idiots like chic noir, who are also too ugly for roissy’s sexual consideration, will invent sexual tension and comment about it.

eventually, the girl will acquiesce and part her legs for roissy. he will run the D.E.N.N.I.S. system on her to completion, then proffer the experience to drive home the point: ironically, a girl who piped up to oppose negs will succumb to a very pure application of them. to keep her from killing herself, because he is a good man at heart, roissy will not taunt her on his blog. some of the brighter beta regulars will pick up on this lesson though and gloat. eventually, the blog post will be removed in fear of feminist gestapo revenge. other readers, such as myself, will just wait for the next day’s post, since this entire episode provides no revelation.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 3:02 am A Voice

Testing…

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 3:19 am Cannon's Canon

yeah i just got bagged too, check again in the morning

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 6:01 am Cliff Arroyo

@Starker, thanks for the info, I was wondering when something like that would happen.

As my dear departed grandma used to say, on average men only win against women in three areas 1) physical strength 2) math 3) sports trivia.

In any conflict that can’t be resolved on those grounds, bet on the woman to do more damage.

As for the issues HR brings up, I’d assumed that Roosh (with his mommy issues and obsessions about ‘teaching girls lessons’ was the violent one (and had moved to SA partly to be able to indulge in those predilictions). I thought Roissy’s comments in that direction were posturing and/or winding people up.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 7:22 am Cannon's Canon

http://jezebel.com/5440560/why-was-tessa-savicki-forcibly-sterilized-when-she-asked-for-birth-control

and the truth will be self-evident

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 8:45 am Omega Dork

I will be willing to contribute to Roissy’s legal defense fund if he sets one up.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 8:46 am sixtypoundhound

fuck avatar.

waiting for the Firefly/Serenity sequel… sci-fi from people who have actually slept with a woman.

“I aim to misbehave”

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 11:39 am Stephen

@Hughristic:

Is =! Ought

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 11:41 am dana

hughristic

it is utterly ludicrous that someone can get in trouble for merely pointing out on an anonymous blog the BLATANTLY obvious fact that by THEIR own actions and choices millions of women prove daily that they either DO like being hit or will at least accept being hit by a man they are wildly attracted to. it’s neither misogynistic nor abusive to point this out.

the fact that feminists tie themselves in big constructivist knots in an attempt to pretend this isn’t so doesn’t change it.

all this blog has EVER done, from what i can tell, is observe how the men to whom WOMEN GIVE ACCESS TO THEIR PUSSIES act and advised other men to act like THOSE men if they want pussy.

if women don’t like these observations maybe they should stop wildly broadcasting their laments over the hundreds of “jerks” and “abusive” men they “inexplicably” seem to spend their entire most fertile years banging and trying to snag. every time a woman tells a man he’s “too nice and they should just be friends”, a jerk who hits women gets laid again.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 11:46 am I dont get it

What happened? Is a post missing here? The end of this thread is confusing me.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 11:56 am cuckoo

@dana
Even more ludicrous when the person being outraged gave her pussy freely to a guy who knocked her about and even knocked her up.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 12:38 pm RB

I always thought it would be an awesome conclusion of the blog if Roissy just stopped posting all of a sudden with no follow up whatsoever.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 12:46 pm Anonymous

dana said: “if women don’t like these observations maybe they should stop wildly broadcasting their laments over the hundreds of “jerks” and “abusive” men they “inexplicably” seem to spend their entire most fertile years banging and trying to snag. every time a woman tells a man he’s “too nice and they should just be friends”, a jerk who hits women gets laid again.”

Amen! Be a punk bastard and piss women off– it’s arousing at least and, when they calm down, they’ll find you more attractive. It’s all about the arousal, baby! (Screw civilization, who needs it?)

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 1:13 pm PatrickH

Wouldn’t mind seeing the deranged stupid nutcase get sued for hate speech for her “J… the Jew” comment.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 1:41 pm dragnet

I doubt R is being railroaded on domestic violence—where’s the beef? What, some post he wrote last year about smacking and banging some chick—with no hard evidence she’s even real? That’s some weak tea.

No, if the cops are involved it’s probably over the liberties he took posting LR’s son’s photo online. But my guess is that law enforcement isn’t involved—but these harpies probably outed him to his boss at work and he’s feeling the heat with regards to his livelihood.

Just my $0.02.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 1:54 pm Doug1

Free speech if far more robust in the US than many of you seem to think or fear. At least in the public arena. Universities are another matter.

“Hate speech” is not a crime in the US unlike in much of Western Europe (and Canada, though the parameters there are still being worked out I believe). It’s called the First Amendment, and no there’s no hate speech exception. Though it is grounds for expulsion or other private discipline on many college campuses. Many people get a wrong idea of the law from what colleges discipline these far lefty campus days.

Nor is advocating violence against women in a general way a crime. (Not that Roissy’s done that, as opposed to make various observations about how man women actually react to it, but if he had, it’s not a crime.)

Making observations is far from inciting imminent violence in listeners or readers caught up in the emotional impact in that moment. Arguing that such speech will have the general longer term affect of more violence against women in domestic and other situations doesn’t remotely cut it under the First Amendment. It’s clearly protected speech, front and center.

Inciting a crowd to immediately turn on the women around them, or certain women, in an emotionally frenzied speech can be a crime, particularly if that’s indeed what the crowd then does. That’s the “yelling fire in a crowded theater” exception to the first amendment. It’s very sparingly applied so far in America.

The more that a writing is sober and considered, and aims to explain claimed truths or advocate political or social changes, the dramatically less it can be considered incitement speech.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 1:55 pm PA

She is forgetting that the sole reason for Roissy posting her son’s photo was out of an almost fatherly concern for the boy. He asked her to remove it from her MySpace page where she had it publically displayed right next to pics of mommie’s puckered ass in panties and other lewd poses.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 2:01 pm Doug1

Dragnet

No, if the cops are involved it’s probably over the liberties he took posting LR’s son’s photo online.

No, that was fully legal. It wasn’t close to illegal. Roissy simply reposted to his own site a completely innocent pic of her son that she had on her Myspace pages, mixed in among photos of her in lingerie and sexually suggestive poses. He then offered to take it down right away if she would take the same pic down from her own site — and he did when she did.

Further he didn’t do anything to out the true identity of either her son or herself, but justed the same screen name for herself that she herself had adopted and cross linked to widely on the web. The clear purpose for posting the vanilla pic was to shame her about posting it. Yeah that was likely motivated most of all by dislike of her and her skanky behavior (widely shared around here after awhile).

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 2:15 pm dana

anonymous

it is the women rewarding the behaviors with pussy who are saying “screw civilization” not the men

women are much more vulnerable and benefit much much more from civilization than men, if they cared about it at all they’d stop chasing “arousal” and fuck, feed and support the decent men who want to provide for and protect them.

because women rarely think systematically, connect dots or see more than one step ahead into the future they have no conception that they are chopping at the roots of all that sustains them.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 2:37 pm FirstComment

If Roissy were having serious legal problems with the website, I assume it would be down right now. He’s taking a three week break from his readers as part of some sort of experiment.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 2:40 pm Rum

If LR is determined to “out” Roissy she will almost certainly end up with her own true name and address, etc. in the public domain. There is only so far to go down the road she appears to have chosen without losing ones anonymity, especially if law enforcement gets called in.
Does LR have vulnerabilities regarding her employer and her on-line disclosures? I have no idea. I do not care. However, since she includes a lot of clear fotos of herself in her on-line exploits – which would tend to make it harder for her to disassociate her real-life self from anything potentially embarassing.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 2:45 pm ARCHIVE?

hey all…I know there was someone here who once archived all roissy’s posts into one or two documents. could that person post these, in case of the worst case scenario? whatever the details of R’s life are, this is still the best pickup manual on the web bar none. it needs to be preserved for posterity.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 2:51 pm Seeking Alpha

@FirstComment

All the LR posts are missing, so I don’t think that’s it.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 3:12 pm Dildo Daggjns

frats
tits.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 3:38 pm PA

The LR – Denise commentary on LR’s blog is entering Twilight Zone on Laughing Gas territory. Commenter Denise [with a string of “professional” acronyms like Masters of ED] is talking about “building a case” against Roissy by forwarding Roissy’s advice to cancel dates to the Authorities.

On a related note, I’m not sure if Denise is a human or a sock puppet / jargon generating software.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 3:41 pm el chief

some decent advice from David DeAngelo (been a while!):

http://www.askmen.com/top_10/dating/top-10-ways-to-start-talking-to-women_10.html

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 3:52 pm foo

Remember: you can, and should, shout “fire” in a crowded theater when there actually is a fire.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 4:30 pm Lexington Green

“He’s taking a three week break from his readers as part of some sort of experiment.”

Maybe he is writing his book. I hope so.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 5:05 pm carp

12 months of steady lurking…yeah. i smell smoke.

funny, though….i have sometimes wondered if our host would just pull the plug unannounced one day. i mean, nearly every day in the last year, he produced substantial posts.

if a book is in the works, that bad boy is on pre-order at amazon.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 5:25 pm G

Maybe shit’s going down with LR and Roissy’s attorney told him to hold back, or maybe he’s taking a break and working on his book. I’d prefer to think of him chilling on a beach in Rio swooping hotties with Roosh. Wherever he is, I’d wish he’d do just a small post–anything–so I don’t have to see that godawful image every time I check in to see if he’s posted something new.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 5:26 pm Anonymous

Shitslinger:

Thanks for the spoiler, asshole.

anyone who actually reads a gunslinger comment deserves what he gets. normal people just skip them.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 5:57 pm haha

the timing isn’t accidental – a new year, maybe a new URL.. any number of possibilities.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 6:52 pm Jeff

If LR or some other feminist trash is responsible for getting Roissy off the internet, retribution must be enacted on those responsible, in a way that nobody will ever attempt to silence others in our foxhole again.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 7:06 pm Horatio Sanchez

‘Ey Roissy, if shit gets rough, set up something where we can donate. And write a book mate, that’s sure to bring in some $$$.

I hope someone is working on outing LR. Can’t be too hard at this point (and of course, it would be entirely legal). Maybe they should wait until our host’s own issues blow over, though, but after that – open season!

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 7:38 pm redordead

Congratulations on your engagement Roissy.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 8:33 pm Tinderbox

The absence of even a brief update to inform us that the site is going on hiatus makes me think that maybe Roissy no longer has access to his own WordPress account. Perhaps some kind of court order barring him from posting here until a hearing or case is complete? Or as G says above, perhaps his attorney has advised him to freeze it for awhile rather than take it down completely, which could be taken as an admission of liability.

Even so, his opponents would have a hard time presenting a libel case in this country.

I’m no lawyer nor do I know anything about D.C. law, which is probably different from typical state law. If anything, you’d think that D.C. would have the most permissible laws in the country regarding free speech, in deference to being the center of our representative Federal government and the primary location of the most important protest events.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 8:44 pm Tom

I think he is preparing his masterpiece for release in a few weeks

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 9:15 pm Jack

Yes, there is clearly employer intimidation going on. The threat is the main reason why I won’t challenge the IMBRA law…see the Roissy post at

http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/repeal-the-imbra-now/#comment-152219

But the “Outing” happened in November and it refers to a self-outing a year ago.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 9:40 pm Jack

I hadn’t realilzed the radical feminist in question (LR) was really on such bad terms with Roissy. I thought she and Roissy were more like kidding each other. But her blog makes it clear that she thinks of Game as Rape and this blog as Hate Speech. She makes it clear she wants him arrested now.

She is a Marxist feminist to the core. Where I agree with her is that she accurately states that American women are also often Marxist feminists and when they go to bars they still HATE MEN. I agree with LR that American women in public often feel that men who try to meet them are harassing them by even trying – Game won’t work when they already hate men and know about game and want to shoot down any man who tries to use it or any other means to get to know them.

I don’t live in the USA anymore because of this fact. It is not worth it to try to use game on feminists. Move. Don’t pass Go and do not collect $200.

Roissy said in his October post on IMBRA that he wanted to preserve the “mail order bride” route for the “future.” Wrong answer. There is no such thing as a “mail order bride” but foreign women in their own countries are what Roissy should have been pursuing the past few years instead of dealing with feminist garbage like LR in DC.

Since LR could never get a hate speech conviction (or even trial) her only real threat is to try to get him fired from a great job…and in that she seems too stupid to realize that a man like Roissy in Washington DC could create and work for a Men’s Rights Organization that could totally destroy feminist laws and reshape the political landscape.

LR better hope Roissy is not freed up career-wise to take on VAWA and IMBRA in Congress (forcing Republicans to oppose them or get voted out of office by males).

The main tactic of LR’s crusade now, also used by feminists to get IMBRA passed as a law, is to use anecdotes and rare incidents of what Roissy supposedly wrote. In this case they picked on one or two sentences out of tens of thousands written that might be seen as condoning Violence Against Women.

In arguing with PA, LR deeply enjoyed today gloating about how “getting on the sex offender list means never getting off and having your family tortured by others for having a sex offender in the family”.

She is admitting that the concept of a “Sex Offender List that you cannot get off of” is a Marxist Feminist concept that disrespects the US Constitution and any sense of justice to the innocent or falsely accused. Too bad so many social conservative men seem to think the same way.

LR mentions, regarding Roissy, another feminist fall-back that can get brain-dead social conservatives to agree with her if they are in a position to hurt his career: mention is made of Roissy supposedly saying once that the age of consent should go back to 14 (in any other country, this would be a valid opinion but not in the USA because the US is controlled by feminists and social conservatives). If he talked about the subject, it would have been safer to say “the US should have a universal age of consent of 16 and not the nonsense pushed by feminists and socons that has gotten the age raised in some states including a bizarre Delaware law that says 16 is the age of consent unless the man has just turned 30 from 29 in which case it jumps two years to 18.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 9:54 pm Jack

LR doesn’t seem to realize how dangerous to feminism Roissy would be if he lost his current job and was free to form a Men’s Rights Lobby in Washington DC. He can give himself a $6000 per month salary representing males in Congress and he could get VAWA/IMBRA repealed or overturned – Republican politicians just need a little carrot and stick treatment to oppose Marxist feminism again after Bush and Karl Rove outrageously decided to stop condemning feminism.

If he comes back to blogging, he needs to concentrate on finding a benefactor for that contingency. MRAs and PUAs need to finally unite (this is a given) and get a National Organization for Men funded like Fathers & Families got funded.

That said, outrageous ideas and criticizing “women” instead of “feminists” will not win Republican favor against feminists.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 10:16 pm copacetic

It’s likely that he’s on a camping trip with Zeets, filled with lots of assfucking and fisting.

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 11:21 pm Pupu

Pupu wonders whether mysterious disappearance is in Roissy’s new year resolution. Please don’t turn into Agatha Christie — she was exciting alright, but too much a worry-maker for her compatriots.

Kay, the point taken. Time to be back now. Stop being a drama queen 🙂

LikeLike
on January 8, 2010 at 11:28 pm whiskey

F it. We need to prepare a class-action suit against LR and her employer (you know she wrote most of her stuff at work, and spent most of her time harassing Roissy at work).

Cause? Deprivement of enjoyment of Roissy’s posts.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 12:03 am Starker

Doug1
I hear you loud and clear on the First Amendment issues. It’s hard to imagine them nailing him for anything written on his blog per se.
Some things to keep in mind: LR is a very nasty piece of work and she won’t rest until she’s planted her flag between our boy’s eyes.
PA
Denise M.Ed. may be a sock puppet or jargon-generating software, but there are millions of them out there and they dominate places like human resources departments.
This brings us to the workplace. Remember, readers of this blog are not an average sample: we have above average intelligence, generally, and take certain truths about human nature for granted. Those calling shots on Roissy’s career future may not share these traits. They may be scandalized by some of the stuff here and not just the PUA parts. For example, I remember Roissy’s moving eulogy on the death of Sen. Kennedy. He has wisely made it disappear, but, as you all realize, things have a way of surviving on some form on the Web. If I had read it aloud to a liberal audience the day after his death, when it was posted, I would have created a lynch mob. Then again, they may take the easier route and fire him for blogging on work time if they can make that stick.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 4:00 am HughRistik

For all the folks who responded to me, let’s make a few things plain:

1. Game works
2. Game is ethical, except for some particular techniques
3. Feminists, and critics of Roissy persistently get women’s preferences wrong

MNL said:

It’s a tool to marginalize what they don’t want to admit to themselves or allow others to recognize, i.e., that game works. The agenda of most Roissy’s critics is to preserve the status quo of a beta-ized manosphere and Roissy is causing them some cognitive dissonance.

Completely agree. Roissy’s critics are biased and don’t know how reality really works. Does that mean Roissy didn’t genuinely say some messed up shit? No.

Furthermore, Roissy’s attempt to clarify a “position” that should already be clear would have no positive impact and would only serve to validate that which critics have already assumed, i.e., if the defendant feels the need to clarify what he said, then what he said was necessarily unclear and incorrect to begin with!

Roissy did say things that are either unclear and incorrect. So he does need to clarify them. You either haven’t read his writings very well or you are glossing them over.

Let’s review:

Roissy admits hitting a girlfriend and said that it was “deserved”:

One time I backhanded my girlfriend across the face. Hard. I won’t get into the details of what led up to the altercation, except to say that the slap was fully deserved.

In that same post, he also discusses slapping women like it is a technique his readers might actually use:

Note that hitting a woman is context dependent. You cannot walk up to a random woman on the street, slap her in the grill, and expect her to jump your bone. Nor can you hit a woman on the first date, hoping it will close the deal. Hitting, in powerful SINGULAR bursts no more than one slap at a time, will only have the intended pussy moistening effect on women who are already in your sexual orbit. She must be your girlfriend or lover. If she isn’t already intrigued by you, hitting her won’t make her so.

Maybe he is only being descriptive, not prescriptive, here. But the use of the second person makes it sounds like slapping a woman might be something that we might actually do and he is advising the proper calibration.

In another post, Roissy sounds very much like he advocates slapping women:

Ingenues love the father figure (are fathers needy? no), so play up those strengths — be her authority, lead, slap her when necessary, playfully dismiss her juvenile provocations, and always be prepared to lay down the law.

You keep saying that Roissy is being tongue-in-cheek. But when is he being tongue-in-cheek and when is he being serious?

– Roissy says that he hit his girlfriend. Is that tongue-in-cheek? Doesn’t sound like it.
– He says she deserved it. Is that tongue-in-cheek? Doesn’t sound like it.
– He suggests slapping women with the “Ingenue” personality profile. Is that tongue-in-cheek? Normally I say “yes,” because I can’t imagine a civilized guy advocating something like that. The problem is that we are talking about a guy who admits to hitting a woman and justifies it. So can we assume that he is being tongue-in-cheek in that last quote? No.

There is a very simple way for us to know what Roissy meant to be tongue-in-cheek: he tells us.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 4:01 am HughRistik

Cannon’s Canon said:

hughristic is a gender traitor.

Yes, if by “gender traitor” you mean “guy who doesn’t want some blogger to embarrass the entire game and men’s rights movements by appearing to condone hitting women.” Anyone who wants to see my traitorousness in action should check out my archive at FeministCritics.org.

And my name is spelled with a “k.”

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 4:03 am HughRistik

Stephen said:

@Hughristic:
Is =! Ought

But is Roissy saying “is,” or “ought” or both? Saying that his girlfriend “deserved” to be hit is not merely a descriptive claim. And remember this quote:

Ingenues love the father figure (are fathers needy? no), so play up those strengths — be her authority, lead, slap her when necessary, playfully dismiss her juvenile provocations, and always be prepared to lay down the law.

“Slap her”? That’s not merely description, either.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 4:05 am Cannon's Canon

huffpostik can suck my dick and get his mouth clamped down as i’m coming, no homo

you see, it is not gay because i added “no homo” to the end of that statement

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 4:41 am Cannon's Canon

i would like to announce to this board that i have created yet another arch nemesis by way of my violent critique of yesterday’s facebook breast cancer awareness invasion.

i endured two dozen single-word color status feeds (uhh, i guess the renaissance man shouldn’t care much about his facebook feeds, but let’s flesh out a ‘media diet’ after my story). being an asshole, i posted my super-alpha, giant penis style status ” there were an estimated 27,000+ deaths from prostate cancer in the united states in 2009, but this does not merit little ribbons, an NFL awareness week, or smug one-word facebook status updates.”

as if infuriating me was their only goal, my females friends CONTINUED to post bra colors! even minutes later! being a super-alpha, i am hip to these shit-tests, so i did not respond.

as my super-alpha, negligent future-time-orientation lifestyle goes, i wound up getting blasted off a large bottle of exclusive vodka that is not available in most neighborhoods. i am a man of the worlds, so i have a few homo thug friends. one of these homos dared to ask about the single-word color posts…

i hit him with this answer:

“to jump to the end of your question, it is because we are in the tailspin of a credit-driven recession where democracy has overproduced useless “intellectual property”… aka too many women with english degrees… these broads flush out the professionals with degrees in “sociology” and “communications”..

the reigning useless engine is the “breast cancer industry”, which now apparently warrants its own viral media campaign. the lesson to glean is that sperm are cheap and eggs are expensive. nothing offensive here.

however, don’t think this doesn’t concern the gay community! after gay marriage is inevitably sanctioned, it will be us men, en masse, that are sued by women (the “enfranchised” ugly ones) for not siring the children of their dreams. forty year old women will sue their government for withholding natural fertilization!

visualize being forced to have sex with a fat old ugly person who is across from your orientation. that is exactly what these one-word status updates are plotting toward!!!!”

….

you may re-read that to digest the potency of my words. of course, though i vote against gay marriage, i have already devised a scheme to defraud the government for my own profit after gay marriage is inevitably voted into play.

regarding this facebook experience, of course some girl whose grandmother died of breast cancer wanted to call me out for disregarding my own mother, sister, niece, aunt, and ancestral female spirit. i was blessed with THIS reply:

(entitled: BEIGE!!!!) “Some people simply want to spread awareness to find a cure.
Women everywhere could easily claim your rant to showing you are against women as a whole. Against finding a cure for breast cancer. What about your sister? Mother? Grandmother? If they were to be diagnosed, wouldn’t you hope they will get the help they need???
Our intentions are GOOD here! For you to turn it around the way you did shows that you are WAY too paranoid.
I’m sorry. I’m a very nice, southern girl. But your rant really upset me. And would upset many others I know who simply want to raise awareness so they don’t die of this one day.”

flattered, i reverted to some basic beta as i replied “sorry to have offended yo i will reluctantly fondle some boobies this weekend to observe breast cancer awareness, as it is the fashionable thing to do.”

she calculated if i too was ambiguously gay, then declared to me forty minutes later: “No one wants you to fondle any boobies. You stick to what you like. The color game wasn’t aimed at men, gay or straight. Had nothing to do with men whatsoever.
It’s a little reminder to women to do her regular self exams, schedule annual mammograms. The earlier you catch it, faster you get treated, more likely to survive. That simple.
If you’re going to insist there is some hidden agenda, that’s your own paranoid ignorance. If that’s the case, I feel sorry for the closed minded, negative world you choose to live in.
My mother kept a shower hanging of self exam reminder (prob because of her mothers death) and remembered seeing it in my aunts shower, later my cousins. Not because it was fashionable. Because it was a reminder.
I hope gay women out there are playing our silly little awareness game so that they too will remember. Because every human being: man, woman, short, tall, gay, straight, black, white, purple, yellow deserves to live a long, happy, healthy life. Hopefully in a world that excepts them..
Silly bra games and all.

Your rant has caused me to rant. Goodness! I hope you know that I’m not a bitch. I just have to express how I feel here. It’s a touchy subject for me.”

i copied my friend on this email chain. he wanted me to drop statistics on her and school her with knowledge. i did not, as i do not see the point. this girl is probably a genuine, loyal “sweetheart” with a positive moral fiber. just because her construction is transparent to me does not mean i should crush her soul.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 4:48 am Cannon's Canon

gig,

tomorrow i am going to a party in green point, brooklyn… true ground zero for hipster chicks. how did your cuban credit derivative resurgence routine work on those flannel-shirt wearing bitches down there that still secretly love money while simultaneously enfranchising the indigenous people…

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 7:00 am Loon Jobbie

I agree Canon, HughRistik is a real…what? Womanly man? Uber-beta desperately begging for a pat on the head from the old anti-Semitic lady?
His validating and supporting this witch-hunt atmosphere is disgusting. Some anti-feminist, his first reaction is to shut down that with which he doesn’t agree.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 7:56 am Jack

I read Hugh’s blog. Mostly inexperienced guys who are mostly afraid to label themselves MRAs. They refuse to admit that the Democrat Party is run by the NOW and some of the “men’ claim they are not MRAs because they are now “embarrassed” of the term because they mistakenly think the “far-right” has taken up the MRA cause recently (I wish they had but the far right hates men, especially Fox News).

There is not a hint of testosterone at that blog, like nobody there thinks getting laid might be a good thing.

In short, Hugh’s blog has very little content most of which is lacking in substance while seemingly trying to placate vicious Marxist feminists who might be reading.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 8:12 am Jack

I am busting Hugh’s chops here because he might be a true MRA as he says he is but needs to prove his contention that he is in light of the apparent nuclear attack against the personal identity of another blogger.

A real MRA would have opposition to VAWA if not IMBRA front and center or a link to strong arguments against such laws on the homepage.

Roissy was vehemently against VAWA and IMBRA making his betrayal all the worse to MRAs…unless the betrayal motivates Roissy to start lobbying Congress full-time.

Unhelpful to MRAs was Hugh’s “What Feminism Got Right” page which one would have thought would say “THEY GOT THE SEXUAL REVOLUTION RIGHT – YEAH BABY” or “The NOW is right that social conservatives need to stop federal funding for Abstinence Education Programs”.

No – Instead he says that feminists are right in that men do oppress women (no they don’t) and “there is something wrong with pornography” (no there isn’t) and “power dynamics and sexuality can be damaging to people” (but not in a way that can and should provoke regulation if parties are above the age of consent).

It was infuriating that a so-called MRA (who is embarrassed about calling himself an MRA because Glenn Beck might have spoken once about men’s rights) listed where he agreed with feminists without adding the caveats of where any decent MRA would draw the line on that agreement.

His use of the word “can” in “power dynamics can be damaging” makes me wonder if he favors IMBRA’s mandate to stop men from saying hello to foreign women because of the Marxist theory that US men may have economic “power” over foreign women (nobody is complying with IMBRA and the law will be overturned the moment someone challenges it).

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 8:23 am Jack

Let me remind everyone that, because the NOW is the official enemy of all MRAs by definition, anyone who seems to ignore the fact that the NOW controls the Democrat Party is NOT an MRA. This is not to say that an MRA like Glenn Sacks cannot be both a Democrat and a highly effective MRA (he is the defacto leader of the movement). But Glenn Sacks shows that he is fully aware of what the NOW is and what they are trying to do. He identifies his fellow Democrat opposition by name and shows that he is trying to work from within the Democrat Party to hamper NOW’s influence (this can lead to their total loss of power).

By contrast, saying on a blog (after you perform a nuclear attack against the identiy of the most famous PUA blogger) that you are embarrassed to label yourself as an MRA because “Glenn Beck was allowed to mention something pertaining to men’s rights” is just ignorant left wing partisanship that shows that leftism is more important to the writer than men’s rights.

I do not yet accept the argument that Roissy was betrayed for a valid pro-MRA reason.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 8:28 am Jack

Here is why I smell a rat:

If the far left Marxists suddenly came out wildly in favor of men’s rights, I would be overjoyed and glad to them onboard even though I think more like a libertarian.

So the authors on Hugh’s blog that say they are embarrassed to call themselves MRAs because they saw some MRA issues being discussed on Fox News…have to be fakes. Even as Marxists, they would have to be overjoyed at their cause being accepted across the political spectrum. Otherwise, it wasn’t so much their cause but something they were pretending was their cause.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 8:55 am Jack

Hold it – I give credit where credit is due – the “Assumptions of the Seduction Community” post at Hugh’s blog is excellent with ongoing great comments.

A recent classic comment noted that unattractive women are just as difficult to “pick up” than the most attractive women – which is why good PUAs concentrate on the most attractive women.

Heads up to Hugh for not deleting that comment.

A young woman named Christine just joined to say that she likes it when nice guys show PUA tactics so they can compete with jerks for her. Very insightful comment.

Still, that is just one 2 year old post on his blog. Roissy’s blog was generating more traffic with lots of posts until the alleged torpedo attack.

I resent losing a source of consistent posts.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 9:54 am Anonymous

Eh, the Marxists only want run-down existing society until they can replace it with their no-more-fun-of-any-kind version that’s good for us… look what that worked in the Soviet Union, Vietnam and in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four with its Junior Anti-Sex League.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 10:49 am Joey

I have a very hard time understanding the motivation for the crazy LR and that other crazy psychologist’s long posts about Roissy and PUA’s in general. The closest I can come to it is to believe they are looking for attention and blog success.

When LR first showed up here it was all about her. No willingness to be open to others views. I think she added an entertainment value to his blog and it was fun watching some of the commenters, men and women alike, argue with her. I think she knew this too – at the time. She disappeared for a long while and came back fairly benignly if I recall – but then the s$%t hit the fan. Suddenly she’s upset that Roissy posted a picture of her boy on his site and linked her to a porno video? Riiiight. I think he banned her/moderated her more than ever and it pissed her off – to get the focus back on her she became the one with righteous indignation and revenge focused.

Why men and/or women give her the time of day I can’t figure out. She’s obviously mentally ill. The psychologist who has her back is now is having the most BORING discussions on her site perhaps she’s hoping for a book deal? The profession she’s attached to must be very proud of having her as one of their own. Her letters after her name are proving what? How many professionals visit Roissy every day? I’m guessing hundreds – no posting of credentials – because they prove nothing.

Apparently the psychologist is visiting other men’s sites all over the bloggersphere, cutting and pasting some long winded sometimes not even connected lcomments in the comments. She did this to Savoy’s blog – he doesn’t seem all that impressed. In fact he dedicated a post to her. Although he claims not to know Roissy or have heard of him (I find that hard to believe).

http://therealsavoy.blogspot.com/2009/12/crazy-lady-returns.html

I like PA felt the posting of LR’s son was more about shaming her into realizing posting your son’s picture alongside your panty clad booty was not cool. I would say kosher but she’d jump all over the term and call me Joey the Jew.

LR perhaps you could repeat this mantra to yourself to help you find peace with all of this:

Pot kettle black

Do you know there’s a song you can even sing to yourself – very apropos don’t you think?
I bet you think we didn’t know
Didn’t even see the tides change
But it’s a small, small world, girl
Getting even smaller every day

I bet you think we didn’t know
Didn’t even see the tides change
But it’s a small, small world, girl
Getting even smaller every day

You can fake that smile
For a hollow while
But the kids all learn
Once those bridges burn

Ssssssssssssss

The trash washes up to shore
Even in this landlocked place
The shit gets thicker
It’s toxic
Get it out my face

The trash washes up to shore
Even in this landlocked place
The shit gets thicker
It’s toxic
Get it out my face
And don’t be surprised
If they don’t buy your lies
Some of us can see through
Your stained glass eyes

Pot kettle, pot kettle black
Talk that, talk that smack
Pot kettle, pot kettle black
Watch your, watch your back

Pot kettle, pot kettle black
Talk that, talk that smack
Pot kettle, pot kettle black
Watch your, watch your back

Oh my god
Did you hear (yeah)
About that bitch
And what she did?
I don’t believe it
Aw, aw
What a ho
What a tramp
What a slut

(pause)

Pot kettle, pot kettle black
Talk that, talk that smack
Pot kettle, pot kettle black
Watch your, watch your back

Pot kettle, pot kettle black
Talk that, talk that smack
Pot kettle, pot kettle black
Watch your, watch your back

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 10:49 am cannonball

Hugh’s the defender of right and moral Game – as decided by him. Strikes me as the kind of guy that straddles every forum and game blog and can spout every theory and routine but is yet to actually speak to a woman. His opinions all have a large streak of seeking female approval running through them like he’s hoping this is finally the post that’ll get him laid by the right female reader.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 12:28 pm Stiletto

Gay. Guy is gay. She borrowed her gay best friend for the pic because she’s a baby mama with no daddy. And no, he did not “meekly” go along with the idea. Dude jumped in full force.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 1:29 pm Ian Q. Publiq

first sex-bot getting released today

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/CES/high-tech-sex-porn-flirts-cutting-edge/story?id=9511040

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 1:41 pm Rum

Hughristik

I would not go so far as to say you are utterly clueless; however, there is one huge, there in plain sight thing about Roissy-World that you and so many other MRA types never seem to let into your minds. And that is that in Roissy-World, one does not value some cosmically happy reconciliation between guys and gals because that is looked at as an impossibility. Your type keep trying to bend every discussion towards “Lets all try to be nice and respect each other and the world will be a better place.” The world as a whole would indeed be a “better place” if more people did that but Roissyites take it for granted that gender relationships per se would not improve – because the strong forces driving positive sexual engagement are deeply unruly and largely unconscious(especially among un-enlightened females).
In other words, your type believes in compromise and mutual respect in the gender face-offs. Roissy-ites believe that Western Civilization has always depended on most men being quite naive about the deeper, out of sight realities of the female sexual instinct, but nowadays, for several converging reasons, the real truth is unfolding before everyones eyes and Western Civ will therefore collapse entirely or survive only in a radically different form. And there is nothing that will stop that from happening.
Have a nice day.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 2:23 pm gunslingergregi

”””””””The National Center for Health Statistics recently released a report which found that 43
percent of first marriages end in separation or divorce within 15 years. The study is based on
the National Survey of Family Growth, a nationally representative sample of women age 15 to
44 in 1995. Bramlett, Matthew and William Mosher. “First marriage dissolution, divorce, and
remariage: United States,” Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics; No.323. Hyattsville
MD: National Center for Health Statistics: 2 1.”””””””””

””””””Since every divorce involves two people, the percentage becomes somewhat more meaningful if you double it. E.g., 0.74% of the entire population gets divorced every year. ”””””””””’

So yea big business I wreckin.

So .74 percent of the population gets to see first hand how it works. Then you have the kids that get to see it as well. There will be no shortage of people who have been fucked up by divorce.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 2:32 pm gunslingergregi

Oh yea then the relatives and friends see it to first hand.

I thank the fem lobby for one thing. Abortion is legal. Yeeee Haaaaaaa

Good for me that I don’t have to see a kid brought into the world in the us and I don’t have to pay for it. Win Win in my book.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 3:30 pm WhoisLR

LR says her real name is Wendy Schwartz
LR claims to be a CNC programmer
LR has a thing for Prepaid Legal Services

Is this person LR?

linkedin.c o m /pub/wendy-schwartz/3/b70/86
Listed former employer, Catalyst PDG, is involved with CNC machining

Her LinkedIn profile links to Twitter
twitter.c o m /wschwartz4
which links to Prepaid Legal

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 4:21 pm PatrickH

LR isn’t attacking Roissy because he posted a picture of her son or linked her to a porn video. She kept coming here and commenting and commenting and commenting looooong after that. I think she finally twigged to the fact that all the insults directed at her weren’t negging, weren’t flirting, weren’t indications of interest. They were sincere! People really didn’t like her! Really didn’t think she was attractive and sexy and smart!

And you know what they say…hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. And once it entered the brain of that mental midget that she really was being scorned…well, hell hath no fury like LR finally realizing nobody thinks she’s hot. That turned on the vindictive vengeance machine that occupies the space in some female brains where conscience, self-awareness and humour normally reside, and she decided to make Roissy pay. He stupidly gave her an opening…and she took it.

I don’t think it’s going anywhere…but her writing about this has got her more attention than she was getting here. I’m not certain Roissy’s absence has anything to do with her, ah, campaign. In any case, someone I know pointed me to an exchange this person had with LR about the situation, and let me tell you, reading LR’s pointless mindless useless responses just reminded me of what an ordeal it was to read her here (she was one of the commenters who drove me away from here for some time). What a moron! What trash! What a uselessly un-self-aware low grade waste of protoplasm! I gave up on the exchange after two comments, the usual useless, empty, droning me-me-me comments, from the brain-dead mental and moral nothingness that calls itself LR.

I hope her little campaign costs her dearly. Even if it’s not doing any damage to Roissy at all. Gawd, I despise her and her ilk. Women who know enough about the male-dominated legal system to threaten to use it to accomplish ends their own wretched non-personalities and sloppy goo-bag brains could never accomplish on their own.

Gawd. O tempora o mores.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 5:56 pm Anonymous

Assuming it’s a book Roissy’s working on, if I may suggest a title:

How to F*ck Hot Women, Get ‘Em to Have Your Babies and Keep ‘Em from Running Off with Someone Else While You Grow Old Together

THAT, I’d pay $24.95 for at Borders.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 5:57 pm sweeet1

roissy needs more posts. anyone know why he’s gone?

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 6:20 pm biktopia

if i have to choose between the sociopaths or the psychopath’s diaries, i rather go for the sociopaths,,,
So I do disagree with a lot of things Roissy writes, he is provoking and mean, the advantages to read his column comes with a lot of side info i never wanted to know, sometimes i feel like my retina is raped, its that bad, but on the other hand there are extremely interesting points and a lot off interesting comments. I think LR has a lot of points as well and she can fight back, wow on that, but the whole thing over at her blog is far less interesting to read.
I dont agree with how R treated LR and vice versa, both are made out of the same wood.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 10:00 pm Steve Johnson

Hugh,

Why do you think it is wrong to hit a woman? Putting it more bluntly, if a woman is perfectly ok with a package that includes getting hit from time to time, why do you have a problem with it?

You’re painted into a corner. If women need to be protected from themselves by having men restrain themselves from giving women what they want (the occasional Rhianna treatment) then they aren’t capable of good decisions and need protection from themselves. If that’s the case then boyfriends have every reason to use physical discipline on them because they need strong reminders of the limits of acceptable behavior. If not, then you don’t need to tell men not to hit women because it would simply drive women away.

Jack,

LR isn’t ideological. She’s just low class and thinks of everything in those terms. Ever read her advice on revenge? She advises people to call the employer of the target and inform them of criminal records or outstanding warrants. (1) Normal people don’t dedicate this much effort to “revenge” because they don’t have to strike out at others; when you get shit on by life constantly, like low class people, you look for ways to feel better by hurting others when you can. (2) She assumes everyone has outstanding warrants or some sort of criminal record and works a job where their boss will fire them and hire some other replaceable cog in their place. No one in her world is a professional where the reaction from HR would be protect their valuable employees.

A favorite LR low class tell was when she bragged about how much she knows about psychology because she studied Freud and Jung in community college. She probably really did think that was impressive.

She’s no Ivy League feminist ideologue like Jessica Valenti, she’s just a pissed off woman who’s slightly too smart for her background but still lives like the low IQ people who are her peers. She thinks she’s superior because she’s surrounded by people who are way fucked up.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 10:00 pm Steve Johnson

Oh, and I think PatrickH is dead on re her motives.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 10:31 pm freak show

“She kept coming here and commenting and commenting and commenting looooong after that. I think she finally twigged to the fact that all the insults directed at her weren’t negging, weren’t flirting, weren’t indications of interest.”

agreed. i posted a comment on obsidian’s blog about how it benefits the discussion (and the blog as a whole) to simply ban certain commenters. i disagree with people who claim a priori they aren’t going to do that.

LikeLike
on January 9, 2010 at 10:35 pm Anonymous

dana said,

“it is the women rewarding the behaviors with pussy who are saying ‘screw civilization’ not the men

women are much more vulnerable and benefit much much more from civilization than men, if they cared about it at all they’d stop chasing “arousal” and fuck, feed and support the decent men who want to provide for and protect them.

because women rarely think systematically, connect dots or see more than one step ahead into the future they have no conception that they are chopping at the roots of all that sustains them.”

No argument here. Believe me.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 5:38 am Jack

Hugh: Please answer

1) What exactly have you done to try to hurt Roissy’s real-life persona?
2) Are you cooperating with LR behind the scenes (the one who fervently believes it should be institutionalized in US culture that women should resist game and be rude to any man who tries to meet them)?
3) Do you realize that trying to get an MRA fired is an act of real-life violence?
4) I have 2500 Twitter followers half of whom are conservative women. Women NEVER unfollow – only men who fear that women will leave the Republican Party if my “dangerous” ideas are mentioned by GOP politicians. What this means is that men will be their own worst enemies because they will use “chivalry” as an excuse to combat each other to the lowest common denominator of wimpy obsequious metrosexual feminist supporter.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 5:49 am Jack

Hugh – Also, where did you try to argue with Roissy and let the rest of us know you had a problem with a few posts that I knew nothing about before you gloated about them being reason to destroy an effective blogger yesterday? MRAs know how feminists win by anecdote – they take an isolated case or two that nobody can argue wasn’t wrong (example: murder of a foreign bride) and they use that to tar and feather men in specific and general (example: IMBRA law forcing all men to be background checked before being allowed to meet foreign women). You escalated criticism of two outrageous posts into nuclear war? What if you had done that to the son of a Mafia don? Where have you done the same to a feminist who deserved being fired from her job?

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 6:43 am Jack

Hugh – Regarding your notion that a nuclear strike against Roissy’s real-life persona would “help send a message that MRAs don’t support domestic violence” – you do realize that Roissy lives in Washington DC and, if his career path is opened up, the most likely direction for him to go is to become a paid lobbyist or national organizational director for…you guessed it: Men’s Rights.

You might have just made him your leader – someone whom your blog will have to support because he would be running an organization in DC which would be the only opposition to the NOW.

Professional feminists know their most effective enemies are alpha males that have good jobs that should NOT be fired or else it might free up those effective enemies to do what they themselves are doing (sucking federal dollars from the government tit and using that largesse to lobby Congress for more of the same while saying men are dangerous).

An MRA living in DC with free time on his hands is a huge danger to the flow of $350M per year in federal funds the feminists are getting via the VAWA tit.

Furthermore Hugh: If Roissy is working for the government, they would have the lawsuit of the century on their hands if they try to fire him for his blog because its free speech – feminists are blogging on government time and Roissy isn’t about to say his blog was wrong (he can quickly agree a few posts were off-base).

If Roissy comes back on, I hope he posts more about bad feminist laws so he can underscore that this blog is as much about MRA (Men’s Rights Advocacy) as PUA.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 6:49 am Jack

Regarding the person who said LR was just low class and not an Ivy League feminist like Jessica at Feministing – LR may be a bizarre basket case for her obsession with posting on Roissy’s blog but her attitude that men should be ignored or treated rudely when they approach a woman in public is the feminist-inspired STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE on the East Coast of the USA. I noticed her saying on her blog that she feels it should be illegal for a man to lie to a woman – this attitude is shared by the Bipartisan Women’s Caucus in Congress and IMBRA is only the first law to try to force men to reveal all to women before being allowed to say hello.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 7:31 am Jack

Here is an example of how feminists benefit from alpha male enemies being employed and kept busy doing things other than fight feminism: 4 years ago I learned about IMBRA and became the biggest advocate against the law on the Internet. But I have had a busy job for 4 years since and I also prefer to live as far away from DC as possible, many time zones away. Voila – Nobody has walked into the Rayburn Building in DC yet to discuss the matter. IMBRA still stands only because I have been busy earning a living and enjoying Europe. The smartest thing NOW could do if I were unemployed is get someone to hire me into a business position that would take all my time. And I know the smartest feminists know this: my arch enemies at fem organizations, who knew who I was, were extremely polite with me when I twice corresponded with them to clarify their position on something.

QED: the last thing feminists would want to do to their enemies is get them fired. Understand Hugh?

Having said that, there are historically 2 Internet incidents of interest here:

About 8 years ago, a young Peter Chung left an investment bank in Boston to join the Carlisle Group in Korea. He proceeded to write an email using his corporate email address that described the amazing difference in his sex life since arriving in Korea as compared to Boston. The email went “viral” and Peter was summarily fired. While many use this an example of when NOT to use the company email address, feminists consider it a major milestone and feather in their cap. This guy really didn’t need to have used the corporate email address. If it had been a private email address, however, and he was still fired, he would have been a victim for PUAs and MRAs to avenge.

About 6 years ago, a man in DC got an email address from a woman at a dance club (bad move for him as one must always number close). When he wrote to her requesting a date, she replied asking him for his full name so she can background check him. He replied by email that her attitude implied she held all the power and that he had plenty of other opportunities to date other women and she would just be getting older as she kept banging her head against the wall asking the best men to present their background checks which the best men would refuse to do.

This excellent reply was signed with a fake last name.

The woman decided to take revenge by sending the email out and it traveled around the world, presumably because a lot more men were pro-feminist 6 years ago and would think the man was being a “jerk” instead of being reasonable. MRA blogging may have changed that general attitude.

But back then, feminists tried to ruin the lives of two men in DC who had that name combination – despite the obviousness of the name having been faked in the first place (he was responding to a request for his real name).

Why? The guy had simply answered honestly to a paranoid feminist that he would not give her his last name so she could background check him before a date.

A major Men’s Rights issue should be that we won’t allow men to be shamed for things they write on the Internet.

Meanwhile, here is a good article about people getting fired for their blogs:

http://homepage.mac.com/popemark/iblog/C2041067432/E1132564304/

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 8:14 am Lady Retard

The bigget low class tell of LR was the photos she put up on her blog of her house/street in snow. Nice neighbourhood.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 8:56 am dana

the most tragic thing in the world today is the slightly too intelligent prole. usually raised by dull parents who fail to understand them or their needs, either overly lauded by or conversely held back by whatever public school they are forced to go to they get used to being the smartest person in a room full of dullards and are wholly unaware of either their low class tastes and interests or their limited “conventional wisdom from 1974” bag of psychobabble constructivist memes. LR seems to exemplify this with her typical prole female interest in profiling, serial killers, and “phrenology”…uh, i mean “psychology”.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 9:20 am I Said

“the most tragic thing in the world today is the slightly too intelligent prole. …”

Reminds me of a scene from the 2005 movie “Waiting” –

Mitch: FUCK YOU MONTY! Always gotta be right, with your little quips! We get it, man. You’re fuckin’ edgy and cool. Yeah! You’re the coolest fuckin’ guy at Shenaniganz! WHOOO! That’s like being the smartest kid with Down syndrome! Oh and, oh, yeah. Why aren’t you in jail? I mean what …?

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 9:21 am I Said

Link to above quote –

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0348333/quotes

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 11:47 am Pupu

Roissy,

Next time, when you take a break, please leave with a cute post on top. This family portrait ain’t that cute. And it is so … last year 😦

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 12:02 pm Anyone Archived Roissy in DC?

Then please do send the archive to
inmalafide [dot] com

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 1:37 pm BizzyBrain

Each day that Roissy leaves that fake, piece of shit Christmas picture up, his reputation diminishes exponentially. Any blogger with an ounce of respect for his readers would at least dip into the archives for posts rather than run crap for weeks on end if he can’t come up with something new. Oh, well, maybe it is Roissy’s way of saying, “Fuck all of you!”

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 1:54 pm Anonymous

Polyamory, folks… it’s what we’re talking about.

“Cultures Monogamous and Polyamorous,” by G. Tracy Mehan, III, The American Spectator, Jan 8, 2010:
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/01/08/cultures-monogamous-and-polyam

“Monogamy seeks objective truth and norms. Polyamory is relativist in its moral orientation. The one promotes a limited constitutional state because it assumes self-imposed restraint and self-discipline. The other relies on social welfare programs ‘to rescue its adherents from the effects of its form of sexuality’.”

“Ironically, the culture of polyamory aggressively fosters the kind of male feminists justly decry: the sexually and physically harassing, the abusing and abandoning male.”

Just a sample. Check it out for yourself.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 3:18 pm Advocatus Diaboli

In case you have not seen this before..

The sad truth about relationships

http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/01/09/the-sad-truth-about-relationships/

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 3:21 pm John

While Roissy’s away(maybe he is hooking up with LR??) a quick comment on THE LUCKIEST MAN IN THE WORLD!! Who is that,ya say? Why none othet than actor and left-wing male feminist Tim Robbins! His 63 year old lover/partner dumps him for a younger guy. Now we hear he is devastated. Nigga please!! The reason given is Tim was drag,just wanted to stay at home and hang out. DUH! After 20 years he had grown extremely weary of Susans aging pussy,and could barely bring himself to slurp away at that vinegar-filled twat! Of course he was dull. Now,he has been liberated from her,after getting(most) of the best years of her life–and when young,she sure as hell was hot–and getting to avoid,guilt free,the breakdown of her aging,botox-filled,hormone-pumped,plastic surgeried,dieted,yoga’d and colon cleansed body! he is now free to get younger pussy! he will,I predict,give Susan a migraine,when he finds a pretty young thing and forthwith marries her,all their New Age bullshit aside. She will,in time,grow to resemble Ivana Trump…Tim,beta male feminist,dry your tears,drop your cock and grab your socks! Its GO TIME!!!!

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 3:33 pm Anonymous

Hey, hypergamy is destroying civilization.

Get a loaded gun and protect your mate from being poached.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 3:42 pm Anonymous

Seriously, if monogamy goes… you’re going to be defending what’s yours.

That’s why we have civilization.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 4:08 pm Jack

I just had to sign on again because I am seeing some serious bullshit here the past few minutes.

Alpha males prefer polyamory. Beta males worry about “defending what’s there’s”.

This Tracy character sounds like one of those women who’ve been quite successful over the past 200 years in anglo countries in defining “conservative” as being a beta male filled with “sexual restraint” – basically an aging woman demanding that men who aren’t “liberals” should “self sacrifice” when it comes to seeing younger more beautiful women around.

Liberal “social welfare programs” needed by men who love more than woman? Sounds like the racist BS we white conservatives said about the African-American community 20 years ago when we didn’t like the idea that playas were getting a lot of booty. It was BS then but I swallowed it. Not anymore. Now that condoms exist, there is no longer any reason for a rake to be a liberal who wants all his illlegitimate children taken care of by the state.

It is not “ironic” that feminists support polyamory when they are young but realize it threatens them when they get older. That is the way life is. The key is to use the judiciary to stop women from regulating men’s sex lives.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 4:25 pm Anonymous

Jack said: “Alpha males prefer polyamory. Beta males worry about “defending what’s there’s”.”

Sure ’nuff. “An armed society is a polite society,” as they say in Texas. But, what’s more fashionable today… getting one’s mate jealous or cuckold play? (One male response is healthy, the other is not. Both are driven by the female for her own jollies, regardless.)

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 4:27 pm wattsmith

Have no fear. Roissy will return. He’s like Aslan, coming and going as he pleases, and our little minds can not understand his divine plan. His absence is teaching us to also treasure his presence more. In the mean time, we must just rely on ourselves.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 5:40 pm gig

cannon

It didn’t make any special effect on my usual market, nothing that my usual bullshit wouldn’t, but friday I tested it against hipster chicks. It worked wonderfully.

The fund hasn’t materyalyzed yet, and even if it does, I am not sure about putting even a little money in it.

The story is simply to good to go to waste. I strongly advise using it

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 5:55 pm V.

Has roissy killed himself on the holidays?
Fuck I want more posts.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 5:58 pm Ryder

Does anybody have any RELIABLE info on whether Roissy is going to start blogging again? Or is it over? The guy definitely has talent, hope we’ll be hearing more from him soon. Truly one of the best blogs on the internet.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 6:58 pm xsplat

Anyone remember this editor’s comment?

[editor: familiar and predictable… the death of romantic love. my entire existence is a hymn to romantic love and here i am falling out of love with myself. the time has come to shake things up. perhaps a mysterious leave of absence. or maybe late night carousing, writing when i’m drunk like i used to do when i first started this blog. must… not… allow.. fire… in…. belly… to extinguish.]

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 7:09 pm gig

Yes I do remember

It doesn’change the fact that the best blog in the history of mankind will end because of some early-aged prole and ugly-single-geek decided to play James Bond

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 8:21 pm Arpagus

What is Roissy’s problem with being outed, anyway? It’s not like this blog reflects badly on him. I wouldn’t worry about it. Never tried to to hide my own identity and I’ve said far more unpopular things.

The social proof from having such a popular blog far outweighs any negative repercussions. You don’t even need game with that.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 10:04 pm Anonymous

Well, sh*t, if so, all concerned, at least don’t whine about it like Bill Paxton’s character in the movie Aliens: “That’s it, man! Game over, man! GAME OVER! What the f*ck are we gonna do now?!” 🙂

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 10:34 pm HUNGRY HUNGRY HIPPOS

Best blog in the universe gets taken out by harpy who gets uncomfortable when reading it.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 10:41 pm JB

“It doesn’change the fact that the best blog in the history of mankind will end because of some early-aged prole and ugly-single-geek decided to play James Bond”

WTF has happened?

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 11:07 pm Pick Up Girls

haha this shits hilarious

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 11:52 pm Chic Noir

steve johnson A favorite LR low class tell was when she bragged about how much she knows about psychology because she studied Freud and Jung in community college. She probably really did think that was impressive.

She’s no Ivy League feminist ideologue like Jessica Valenti,

and jessica valenti is still paying off her student loans how many years after graduating???

Yale or fail huh?

“It’s worth going to Harvard even if I’m 100k in the whole because I can brag to folks who wouln’t spit on me if I were on fire that I’m special because I went to Harvard.”

FYI… there are Harvard grads who are currently unemployed.

PS. first rule of being alpha… don’t bend over backwards to empress random people.

LikeLike
on January 10, 2010 at 11:54 pm Chic Noir

sorry

*impress*

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 12:29 am Pupu

“Yale or fail huh?”
“FYI… there are Harvard grads who are currently unemployed. ”

Tyranny of the majority suggests that when in doubt, it is generally safe to go for Ivy bashing.
________________________________
Yes, Chic, Pupu’s pulling your leg 😉

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 12:44 am DCLXVI

Roissy’s blog is like Fight Club. Strikes a primal chord in men.

What causes women to shit bricks is the prospect millions of men would follow Roissy if he organized and led an open revolt against our cuntocracy. Declare war on women. Openly spit on women in the streets Treat American women like the spoiled, worthless, over-entitled brats they are. If that occurred it would be GAME OVER for women.

Tell us what you want Roissy. Paypal account to build a war chest? Bank account to wire funds to? Hire detective agencies and retain law firms to start systematically destroying the crazy bitches everywhere? Hire lobbyists to go after the whore congress. Tell us where to send the money. Millions of men in America are sick of our worthless bitches and the worthless cunt anti-man system. Tell us where to send the money.

The bitches declared war on us 40 years ago. Time to return the favor. They want a civil war? Fine. I’m in.

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 1:00 am Daran

Anyone who wants to see my traitorousness in action should check out my archive at FeministCritics.org.

Unfortunately as a result of a technical problem between my chair and my keyboard, Hugh’s archive is temporarily unavailable at the address he game. Try this one instead.

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 2:58 am MsExceptionToTheRule

“Anonymous
Shitslinger:

Thanks for the spoiler, asshole.

anyone who actually reads a gunslinger comment deserves what he gets. normal people just skip them.”

Who the f*ck is normal?

You must be new in town, or pretending you are

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 3:29 am J DeVoy

Where did Jessica Valenti go for undergrad? Her new husband is a Harvard grad, but whenever I read about her the focus is on her graduate degree in women’s studies from Rutgers.

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 3:57 am Steve Johnson

Chic Noir,

You are truly retarded.

Try rereading. If that doesn’t work just give up.

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 10:13 am aoefe

@ pupu – “This family portrait ain’t that cute. And it is so … last year ”

Ha ha – literally.

His disappearance is just so alpha – dontcha think? I have faith he is enjoying the break, doing what he needs to do, and will come back (with a vengeance). 🙂

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 10:14 am aoefe

Ms. Exception – word!

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 10:17 am Pupu

Aoefe,

Pupu thought of saying it was so *last decade*, but it would have made all of us feel old 🙂

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 11:42 am Doug1

Yeah, Jessica Valenti went to Rutgurs I recall from the piece Roissy linked back when. It’s her mangina (and soon to be if not already cuckold) husband who when to Harvard.

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 12:07 pm firny firny

It would be nice to have a ‘Best of LR’ recap though. All your favourite low class moments, stupidity, lies, self-aggrandizing and raging insecurity masquerading as ‘confidence’. Particularly enjoyable was the DUI charge which even when linked to the official document didn’t happen, then was ‘wrong’. The pre-paid legal team on 24hr stand-by. The threat to hunt down and victimise all those who dared insult her sister – and the invite to do so by commenters – and her complete failure to do so. The scud missile inspecting – and invite by the person working there to give just the first name of her/their boss if she did indeed do that (when not designing Raptor fighter planes) – and her avoidance of the question. The overtly sexual poses on her myspace along with her kid which were ‘ok’ because it was a bikini not her panties – and nevermind the french knicker shots. The stripping for money but outrage at the idea she’d do porn – but not till around 4mths later when she’d thought about it a bit more and decided that’d sound like a better defence to campaign against Roissy than just being a vile waste of space. The millionare/hugely successful daddy, the old money-family name claim etc, etc, etc….

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 3:07 pm j

Roissy, this is evil.

Why are you doing this to your son?

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 7:01 pm chic noir

steve johnson, pot calling the kettle sonny boy.

LikeLike
on January 11, 2010 at 10:28 pm msexceptiontotherule

Good lord. (and no, not you gunz, at least not this time – most others this would be referring to you though 😉 hehehe)

We’re speculating on a possible legal matter existing, which is as unlikely as the world coming to an end at 8pm PST tonight. Unless there are factors that are unknown to the majority here, what would the basis of any kind of legal action be?

I have yet to find any that would make it all the way into a courtroom.

LikeLike
on January 12, 2010 at 2:55 am Steve Johnson

Ahh, the classic “I know you are but what am I?” rebuttal.

Quality stuff.

LikeLike
on January 12, 2010 at 3:34 am Gunslingergregi

You have earned a seat at the table he he he

LikeLike
on January 12, 2010 at 4:44 am msexceptiontotherule

In light of the latest development, I think the previous concerns that our host here was having to deal with allegations of a legal nature are no longer on the table…or desk…or around the blog-world…

but gunz, I thought I was already at the damn table a long time ago. After all, when you’re eating off of the plate of the lady sitting behind you, you’re still paying attention to whatever we’re discussing 😉

LikeLike
on January 12, 2010 at 6:36 pm Gunslingergregi

More figurative than literal and your such a cutie.

LikeLike

Comments are closed.

	Bucky on Don’t Help The Leftoid M…
	Greg Eliot on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
	Ralph Stanley on Sweden Vs Norway
	Greg Eliot on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
	James Edward S. on Don’t Help The Leftoid M…
	Greg Eliot on Sweden Vs Norway
	Hackett To Bits on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
	Greg Eliot on Sweden Vs Norway
	Greg Eliot on Don’t Help The Leftoid M…
	Bucky on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…

Chateau Heartiste

Merry Christmas!

330 Responses

Pages

Twitter Updates

Recent Comments

Top Posts

Categories

Game

MAGA MEN

Syllogism and Synthesis

Chateau Heartiste

Merry Christmas!

Share this:

Like this:

Related

330 Responses

Pages

Twitter Updates

Recent Comments

Top Posts

Categories

Game

MAGA MEN

Syllogism and Synthesis