• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Medicalization Of Maleness
Are Pickup Artists Wrong About The Benefits Of Smiling? »

2009 Beta Of The Year Winner!

January 22, 2010 by CH

After a year of collecting reader submissions for the most nauseating example of sack shriveling betatude the world over, a Beta of the Year “winner” has finally been announced! Based on popular vote, the winner of the 2009 BOTY is…..

Conor, the facsimile of a man who allowed a woman to walk all over him, bought a place for her and him, paid all her bills, and upon discovering her cheating responded in the only way an unrepentant beta could: by asking her what he could do to make her love him. Really, that sort of response is just pure essence of beta.

You can read the full story in this post (candidate #3). Congratulations go to reader Patrick for the winning 2009 BOTY submission. You, sir, with your keen ear for the sorriest specimens of manhood to walk the earth, have just won yourself a skeleton key to the boudoir of my Montreal harem, and a beer on me.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Beta Of The Year Contest, Tool Time | 56 Comments

56 Responses

  1. on January 22, 2010 at 11:10 am Advocatus Diaboli

    Prejudice and truth about the effect of testosterone on human bargaining behaviour
    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7279/full/nature08711.html#abs

    “Here we show that the sublingual administration of a single dose of testosterone in women causes a substantial increase in fair bargaining behaviour, thereby reducing bargaining conflicts and increasing the efficiency of social interactions. However, subjects who believed that they received testosterone—regardless of whether they actually received it or not—behaved much more unfairly than those who believed that they were treated with placebo. Thus, the folk hypothesis seems to generate a strong negative association between subjects’ beliefs and the fairness of their offers, even though testosterone administration actually causes a substantial increase in the frequency of fair bargaining offers in our experiment.”

    LikeLike


  2. on January 22, 2010 at 11:12 am Cannon's Canon

    should have been you, mr. valenti

    should have been you

    LikeLike


  3. on January 22, 2010 at 11:52 am weeklybrainfood

    I believe I am A Glow Worm…………..

    LikeLike


  4. on January 22, 2010 at 12:11 pm L'Emmerdeur

    Is the harem in Montreal, or from Montreal?

    LikeLike


  5. on January 22, 2010 at 12:31 pm Luvsic

    No doubt he will thank her in his acceptance speech

    LikeLike


  6. on January 22, 2010 at 12:34 pm annon

    What a soft dude

    LikeLike


  7. on January 22, 2010 at 12:39 pm Stephen

    My God that’s painful….you might be a beta if some cheesey dj on a cheesy FM morning shows tells you that you need to, “Man Up!”

    LikeLike


  8. on January 22, 2010 at 1:49 pm Backdoor Man

    Your average female listener will be more creeped out by this dude than your average guy will. Your average guy will say, “Man, he’s got it bad. He needs to grow a pair.” Your average girl will say, “Get the fuck away from me. You are a disgrace to the species.”

    LikeLike


  9. on January 22, 2010 at 1:53 pm The_King

    The only acceptable location for a harem is Eastern Europe. Canadians are gross and hairy. If your concubines are Canadian R… you blow and bad taste in women.

    LikeLike


  10. on January 22, 2010 at 2:25 pm Tarl

    OT, but check out the cougar’s lament here.

    Ten years ago, on Christmas Day 1999, I was single, living alone in a small London house with two cats.

    I was 40 and had never been loved, let alone married. My status was pretty close to that of Susan Boyle’s. She, too, lived alone, in a flat with a cat. And in our modern society, nothing denotes failure, promotes so much hilarity and derision, than that.

    On New Year’s Eve 1999, the biggest night of the century dating-wise, family-wise, friendship-wise, popularity-wise, I was stood up by a prospective boyfriend.
    …
    This Christmas, having received not a single invitation to join them from family or friends – I suppose a single, childless, ageing, vegan woman plonked in their midst is not everyone’s cup of eggnog – I am going to attempt to live out the rural ideal and spend the day feeding my animals.

    I have 17 cats, all of whom worship at the altar of St Michael, my sheepdog. There will be sheep nestled like something from a nativity play, horses breathing steam with icicles in their manes.

    And lonely as I may be, the thought of doing just that will, I’m sure, make many women, who are desperately trying to make everything perfect for a family who remain resolutely ungrateful, turn an appropriately festive shade of red and green.

    After slutting around for a while, she married a 26-year-old intern when she was 40, then eventually her hubby dumped her for a younger, prettier woman he wanted to have kids with.

    On his “first day of freedom” (you would have thought I had saddled him with two stroppy teenage children and made him work down a mine) he wrote in another paper that he was, for the first time, thinking about becoming a dad.

    Writing that, when you have just left your wife for (and these are his words) someone “young, slim, pretty, Indian” and have stolen her last childbearing years from her, is hitting pretty far below the belt.
    …
    The worst moment since I found out about his infidelity in India has been when, bored and alone and humiliated on that island in Africa for the remaining two weeks, I read the 800 words he has written of his second novel. He had stupidly (deliberately?) emailed it to my laptop so he could work on it (don’t laugh) while gazing at the Indian Ocean.

    It is all about me, of course, the older woman in whom he has no interest sexually, with whom he manages the tension because he has nowhere else to live.

    He wrote: “I can feel her anger, like cold static in the space between us. I could calm her down, and make things better. I could reach out and touch her. I could press my body against hers, wrap her in my arms, kiss her neck and breathe slowly against her skin. It works every time. But I won’t do that. And I know how much it hurts her that I won’t. Knowing this gives me the closest thing I have to happiness.”

    Oh that stings! Man, her ex-husband is awesome!

    LikeLike


  11. on January 22, 2010 at 2:31 pm Willard Libby

    It’s a radio broadcast of a “War of the Roses” prank that features a cuckolded man literally begging his cheating live-in girlfriend to stay with him.

    Here we go again. roissy what is your fucking problem, please.

    These shows are FAKE. They are typical no talent radio hack routines.

    Why are you obsessed with this nonsense? Does it play on your insecurities about Devil Women always out to get the man?

    Snap out of it man. You seem like a reasonable intelligent guy but sometimes you go way off the deep end.

    This radio shit is FAKE!

    The guy gets rejected by the girl at the sporting event routine is FAKE!

    All the Lamebook pages are FAKE!

    The Onion is FAKE!

    Why can’t you see this?

    LikeLike


  12. on January 22, 2010 at 3:32 pm pike

    Off topic, but here is some research done by a dating site on what kinds of pictures get the most responses. Some myths are exposed.

    http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/2010/01/20/the-4-big-myths-of-profile-pictures/

    LikeLike


  13. on January 22, 2010 at 3:57 pm Puma

    Hip hip Hooorray!!

    LikeLike


  14. on January 22, 2010 at 4:01 pm 11minutes

    Writing that, when you have just left your wife for (and these are his words) someone “young, slim, pretty, Indian” and have stolen her last childbearing years from her, is hitting pretty far below the belt.

    This cracked me up.

    [Even though, sadly, as ridiculous as it is, this is a rather common lament.]

    can someone enlighten me? How exactly do you “steal” child bearing years from a woman? Must be kind of hard to do that without her noticing it…

    LikeLike


  15. on January 22, 2010 at 4:20 pm wow

    Montreal has the hottest women in North America…and they’re quite slutty!

    LikeLike


  16. on January 22, 2010 at 4:50 pm Patrick

    Thanks, Conor, you’ve exceeded my expectations. You know you’re Beta Of The Year when people think the guy who still loves the wife that slashed his throat is more of a man than you are.

    Anyway, the Montreal harem sounds great, but what about an Israeli harem?

    In Israel, the Messiah with More Than 30 ‘Wives’

    http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1954600,00.html

    A possible alpha of the year?

    When you look like this, and you can maintain a harem of young women who revere you as the Messiah, with rules (and fines!) like these…

    4. No woman shall sit idle when there are dishes to be washed, cleaning to be done, children to look after etc.
    Fine: 2,000 shekels

    6. It is absolutely forbidden to question Ratzon on his whereabouts or intention.
    Fine: 400 shekels

    8 No woman shall interrupt Ratzon or intervene in matters not concerning her.
    Fine: 500 shekels

    … then you sir, are an alpha.

    And is it me, or is the overbearing tone of these exposés (and prosecutions) of polygynous harems one of jealousy and an indignant sense of “unfairness” ?

    Alleged crimes notwithstanding, the cultural reaction to these men and their unique domestic arrangements seem to be “how dare he!” along with a distinctly paternalistic treatment of the women who are always assumed to be deluded victims who don’t know what’s good for them.

    Because they flagrantly violate the West’s beta-cultural code of one wife (sexual partner) per man, such men and all of their other activities come under the increased scrutiny of the authorities and media.

    LikeLike


  17. on January 22, 2010 at 5:07 pm Derek

    French Canadian women are dope. Even Ottawa has beautiful women, though Montreal is even better.

    LikeLike


  18. on January 22, 2010 at 8:36 pm Brody

    this outcome is really puzzling to me, and unfortunate because it makes less of a statement. mr. j. valenti would definitely been my top choice if offered. i listened to the recording of our winningest beta – it is beta, but altogether unexceptional. your voting readers failed you roissy.

    LikeLike


  19. on January 22, 2010 at 8:41 pm Lupo

    11minutes: “How exactly do you “steal” child bearing years from a woman? Must be kind of hard to do that without her noticing it”

    Women always think of it this way … after you’re gone. “I gave the best years of my life to you,” is pretty much what every post-30 woman will say to you after you dump her from a LTR of any kind.

    In ye olden days of yore, the post-30 woman would actually have given you the best years of her life: the pre-30 years. Instead, they generally give the best years of their life to the dong-carousel, and take it out on the poor saps who date them later in life.

    LikeLike


  20. on January 22, 2010 at 11:33 pm Alphas Don't Blog

    “a skeleton key to the boudoir of my Montreal harem” = a Google maps link to a “full contact” Montreal strip club.

    LikeLike


  21. on January 22, 2010 at 11:48 pm GayButtox

    should have been you, mr. valenti

    should have been you

    That will happen AFTER he gets cucked up.

    That has not yet happened.

    LikeLike


  22. on January 23, 2010 at 2:03 am P-ROD

    Beta is this Guy.

    shoot me if i’m ever this guy in this video.

    LikeLike


  23. on January 23, 2010 at 10:03 am Cannon's Canon

    “That will happen AFTER he gets cucked up.

    That has not yet happened.”

    true. we will all know the morning after it happens, since it will be immediately blogged about to an understanding audience. then, linked to here for another understanding audience.

    LikeLike


  24. on January 23, 2010 at 1:28 pm Kevin

    As, notwithstanding all that wit, or malice, or pride, or prudence will be able to suggest, men and women must at last pass their lives together, I have never therefore thought those writers friends to human happiness, who endeavour to excite in either sex a general contempt or suspicion of the other. To persuade them who are entering the world, and looking abroad for a suitable associate, that all are equally vicious or equally ridiculous; that they who trust are certainly betrayed, and they who esteem are always disappointed; is not to awaken judgment, but to inflame temerity.

    –Samuel Johnson

    LikeLike


  25. on January 23, 2010 at 1:32 pm Anonymous

    Libby-

    Snap out of it man. You seem like a reasonable intelligent guy but sometimes you go way off the deep end.

    look who’s talking, the guy who foams at the mouth and goes rabidly off the deep end for paragraphs on end whenever someone mentions the merits of black cock or looks of black women. Unintentional irony, thy name is Libby.

    LikeLike


  26. on January 23, 2010 at 2:26 pm sabril

    If it’s fake, it’s really good acting. Better than the acting in 99% of pornos.

    LikeLike


  27. on January 23, 2010 at 2:42 pm gunslingergregi

    Yea he was a good example of someone who could not learn from a mistake.

    LikeLike


  28. on January 23, 2010 at 4:11 pm Torino

    It fake.

    LikeLike


  29. on January 23, 2010 at 5:31 pm Kevin

    that they who trust are certainly betrayed, and they who esteem are always disappointed; is not to awaken judgment, but to inflame temerity.

    If you are going to love someone, you’re better off knowing what you are loving. Sure, not all women are the same, but as a group they share a lot of traits, some of which are fun, some absurd, some dangerous, and some in opposition to the interests of men. If you want to get the best out of interacting with women, you’d best understand them. But understanding a car is not enough, you need practice in driving it. Cars are dangerous tools.

    It would be dangerous to get into a car without understanding and skill. Same for women.

    And so I think temerity is called for – the temerity to say bullshit to the head games that women play, and the temerity to play headgames right back at them.

    LikeLike


  30. on January 23, 2010 at 5:49 pm xsplat

    woops – the above is Xsplat, quoting Kevin, quoting Samuel Johnson. Inflaming temerity.

    LikeLike


  31. on January 23, 2010 at 6:55 pm haha

    LikeLike


  32. on January 23, 2010 at 8:45 pm Tinderbox

    Apologies if anyone’s posted this already in another thread.

    “Math Geek Comes Up With Equation to Explain His Lack of a Girlfriend”
    http://www.asylum.com/2010/01/11/peter-backus-mathematical-equation-that-you-shouldnt-feel-bad-if-you-dont-have/

    “Backus reimagined the equation by inserting U.K. population figures along with the general parameters for his potential girlfriend: a woman between the age of 24 and 34, with a university degree, whom he finds attractive. Simple enough. But there are complications. First, the woman in question must find him attractive (a 1-in-20 chance, he estimated). Second, she must herself be single (50-50). Lastly, he must get along with her (1-in-10).

    The result of the equation? Of the roughly 30 million women in the U.K., only 26 are potential mates for Backus. In his conclusion to the paper, Backus expresses this more depressingly: “On a given night in London, there is a 0.0000034 percent chance of meeting one of these special people.””

    LikeLike


  33. on January 23, 2010 at 8:49 pm whiskey

    That’s hilarious.

    LikeLike


  34. on January 24, 2010 at 4:28 am YA

    Beta male serial killing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belle_Gunness

    LikeLike


  35. on January 24, 2010 at 10:47 am Allahpundit Demands a Recount! 2009 ‘Beta Male of the Year’ Award : The Other McCain

    […] ‘Beta Male of the Year’ AwardPosted on | January 24, 2010 | No CommentsI’m sure the name of the winner at Roissy in DC is merely a coincidence:Conor, the facsimile of a man who allowed a woman to walk all over him, […]

    LikeLike


  36. on January 24, 2010 at 11:43 am Random Guy

    Love the site, but I am still reading though your old posts.

    Can’t comment more at the moment, but Roissy thought you would find this interesting as further validation for your theories. Might make a good post.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704869304574596193584067688.html?mod=rss_opinion_main

    LikeLike


  37. on January 24, 2010 at 12:09 pm A Valued Commodity

    LikeLike


  38. on January 24, 2010 at 1:03 pm joel

    This thread seems quiet, so might as well drop this in.

    For the marriage minded betas, keep in mind that women instigate most divorces. My theory is that they divorce for economic advantage. The husband still pays why they do do something more fun.

    Here is a quote from the NY Times today in an article about the wife being the money maker.

    While it’s widely believed that a woman’s financial independence increases her risk for divorce, divorce rates in the United States tell a different story: they have fallen as women have made economic gains. The rate peaked at 23 divorces per 1,000 couples in the late 1970s, but has since dropped to fewer than 17 divorces per 1,000 couples. Today, the statistics show that typically, the more economic independence and education a woman gains, the more likely she is to stay married. And in states where fewer wives have paid jobs, divorce rates tend to be higher, according to a 2009 report from the Center for American Progress.

    Got it? As women contribute more financially to the marriage, they are less likely to want to divorce. Keep that in mind when marrying, if you must. Note that the NY Times doesn’t mention which party instigates the divorce.

    This is just more bad news for woman who just want to have kids and stay home and raise them, but, hey, that’s progress.

    LikeLike


  39. on January 24, 2010 at 1:22 pm gunslingergregi

    @avalued commodity

    Why you must save the money from those tasks you have done so you can be free. You must do for yourself.

    Of course most won’t because it is to hard.

    If it was so great and so free of a system why is the system so against suicide. A way to permanently leave the system he he he

    @joel

    You should get the stats for percentage of marriages that end in divorce or predicted to end in divorce like 50 percent. So really the number of people getting married is going down and the nyt is slightly midleading he he he

    LikeLike


  40. on January 24, 2010 at 10:44 pm Bird Beats Cat

    LikeLike


  41. on January 25, 2010 at 10:45 am Gil

    Aw! I wanted it to be December – the guy who gets nearly killed yet wants the fugly back.

    LikeLike


  42. on January 25, 2010 at 10:55 am PA

    I like this BOTY choice. The spirit of Beta Awards is to recognize an otherwise normal male who does extremely beta things. Though my choice was the dude who helped his wife lay flowers on her lover’s grave.

    Not so much a guy who seems like an outlier loser, mentally ill, abnormal masochists, or a wierdo outlier o m e g a in some way, like the oddballs who loved the women who tried to kill them. They are a freak show, not a cautionary tale.

    LikeLike


  43. on January 25, 2010 at 10:57 am PA

    A close contender was the ageing SWPL who mewled about his ugly Argentinain wife’s spending habits.

    LikeLike


  44. on January 25, 2010 at 2:05 pm Firepower

    I nominate Peter, for most persistent.

    Peter Persistent, Jr.

    LikeLike


  45. on January 25, 2010 at 3:49 pm X to the Z

    That piece on “Alpha Wives” by the NYT is LOLbad.

    LikeLike


  46. on January 25, 2010 at 4:23 pm gig

    Peter is my choice, if not for BOTY, at least for BOTB (“beta of the blog”).

    how much a freak and a weirdo a guy must be just to browse those sites then linking to pictures there?

    LikeLike


  47. on January 25, 2010 at 4:51 pm Kurt

    That audio clip was totally fake! If you are going to have a vote for Beta of the year, I really think you should only include real Betas as opposed to actors.

    LikeLike


  48. on January 25, 2010 at 5:01 pm [blank]

    Young women and teenage girls often face efforts by male partners to sabotage birth control or coerce pregnancy — including damaging condoms and destroying contraceptives — and these efforts, defined as “reproductive coercion,” frequently are associated with physical or sexual violence, a study by a team of researchers led by UC Davis has found.”

    Source:

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100125094503.htm

    LikeLike


  49. on January 25, 2010 at 11:48 pm bort

    Don’t know if you’re a House fan, but you should definitely check out tonight’s episode for a candidate for TV’s beta of the year for 2010.

    LikeLike


  50. on January 26, 2010 at 7:50 am gunslingergregi

    ””””[blank]
    Young women and teenage girls often face efforts by male partners to sabotage birth control or coerce pregnancy — including damaging condoms and destroying contraceptives — and these efforts, defined as “reproductive coercion,” frequently are associated with physical or sexual violence, a study by a team of researchers led by UC Davis has found.”

    Source:

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100125094503.htm
    ””””””””’
    Naa blank it is the other way around the surprize pregnancy has been a tried and true method of getting guys to marry them for a long time. Using that old are you gonna be a man and support your responsibility type crap.

    LikeLike


  51. on January 26, 2010 at 9:11 am Aldonza

    Got it? As women contribute more financially to the marriage, they are less likely to want to divorce.

    I’d love to see if that data controlled for socio-economic status. I do know that higher SES couples divorce less overall, and two-income families have higher SES.

    LikeLike


  52. on January 26, 2010 at 8:01 pm Omnibus Driver

    I know women aren’t supposed to find you truthful, let alone amusing, but both are true for me. I know it’s been a while since I posted these, but they’re such wonderful blog fodder for you, that I can’t resist:

    http://getonthe.blogspot.com/2009/02/speed-bumps-ahead-part-i.html

    http://getonthe.blogspot.com/2009/02/speed-bumps-ahead-part-ii.html

    It just so happens that he’s three seats down the bar from me tonight, and he’s pulling the same old schtick. I actually feel sorry for the guy.

    LikeLike


  53. on January 27, 2010 at 3:45 am david

    how to leave your husband

    http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/CollegeAndFamily/SuddenlySingle/HowToLeaveYourHusband.aspx

    LikeLike


  54. on January 27, 2010 at 10:26 pm Puma

    Nice find David.

    How many of you think that an article called “How to Leave Your Wife” could ever get published in the MSM in the same way?

    LikeLike


  55. on February 6, 2010 at 9:43 am Rex Goliath

    considering those “War of the Roses” phonecalls are ALL FAKE, this is a rather disappointing recipient of the BOTY Award. my money is on August (1st), and February (2nd).

    LikeLike


  56. on November 12, 2010 at 12:48 pm Arjuna, You Magnificent Beta! « Citizen Renegade

    […] Beta of the Year contest is over, but the disease that atrophies the balls of the gender formerly known as men continues […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    oink on “Conspiracy Theory…
    oink on Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat C…
    oink on Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat C…
    oink on Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat C…
    Pale Rider on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    PDB on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    oink on Slutty Women Are Unhappier Tha…
    posts only tweets on The Confound Of Silence
    earl on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    earl on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hivemind Is Real
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Manifest Depravity
    • The Diminishing Returns Of Anti-White Virtue Signaling
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Revolutionary Spirals To Civil War 2
    • Demography Is Destiny
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: