April 16, 2010 by CH
Impressive windup: fi’ dolla
Backhand: benjamin
Not even pausing to glower at the chick after slapping her: priceless (Hey, the man was in the middle of a conversation.)
Giving me the opportunity to write “Morgan Freeman, in ‘Pimpslap Redemption'”: priceless infinity
By the way, Morgan Freeman once said in an interview that his role as a pimp in ‘Street Smart’ was his favorite.
Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.
 | Lichthof on Mocking The Globohomo Cor… |
| Lichthof on Mocking The Globohomo Cor… |
 | Peter Jackson on Mocking The Globohomo Cor… |
 | Dr.Benway on “Conspiracy Theory… |
| Dr.Benway on “Conspiracy Theory… |
| Dr.Benway on “Conspiracy Theory… |
 | Sentient on Mocking The Globohomo Cor… |
| Sentient on Mocking The Globohomo Cor… |
| Dr.Benway on “Conspiracy Theory… |
| Sentient on The Confound Of Silence |
I’ve never slapped a woman, but this really makes me want to go out and give it a try.
LikeLike
I also think he did a great Pimp Slap when he was on the Electric Company.
LikeLike
The character’s quick flip, and accurate placement, and stone-cold delivery, come from years of practice.
LikeLike
Bitch, that ain’t a pimp slap. This is a pimp slap.
LikeLike
mix in nitrosamine reduced snuff
smokings’ utility strictly a killer peacock
LikeLike
Why slap when you can just put the bitch on notice.
LikeLike
Unrelated story.
Study shows 9 month old baby boys and girls tend to gravitate toward different toys — boys like cars, girls like dolls.
Story here: http://tinyurl.com/y6chqpo
Think that’s conclusive, eh? Not so fast!
“So does this mean that boys and girls have an innate preference for certain types of objects? Or does socialization — that is, the influence of parents and the larger culture — impact children’s choice of toys very early in life?
It’s too soon to rule either out, said Walter Gilliam, director of the Edward Zigler Center in Child Development and Social Policy at Yale University.”
Mangina Gilliam and his brethren are bending over backwards to deny proof that there is ANY biological basis for different behavior in males and females. Incredible.
The best part: “The finding raises the possibility of a biological basis for toy choices. A study from 2001 found even 1-day-old boys spent longer looking at moving, mechanical options than 1-day-old girls, who spent more time looking at faces.
Yet the impact of socialization should never be underestimated, Gilliam said. Studies have shown parents and others interact differently with female and male babies from almost the instant they’re born, Gilliam said.”
So they find excuses to disbelieve even a study that showed DAY OLD babies already show behavioral gender differences.
These people are unreal.
Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt.
LikeLike
Why slap when you can just put the bitch on notice.
$20 says he sends one of his reindeer in to take care of her after he leaves.
LikeLike
LikeLike
always thought that chick in the mack is gorgeous
LikeLike
watch Lean on Me. morgan freeman shows superb asshole game.
LikeLike
dat be a better bitch slap dan fitty lzozlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzl
LikeLike
azuzuru, that’s sadly not surprising. They hate on biology so much that, to say it perverts their objectivity, would be an understatement. (“They” being the ultra-liberal academic intelligentsia – a pc minefield of hegemony in itself)
LikeLike
This business promulgated by 2nd wave feminists and accepted by white knighting English chivalry aping in a twisted way fools, that a no or trivial injury slap is some terrible violation of decency anytime a man does it (but is trivial when a woman does) has GOT TO END.
The idea that it should be criminalized, and it is right now under VAWA at least when done my a man to a woman’s he’s living with or married to (and maybe in a non living together relationship with, anyone know) must be REVERSED. though the CRIMINAL penalties invovled in the end are fairly small, the legal fees will amount to thousands at least, he will have a criminal record, and an order of protection is automatic upon accusation, long before proof or his pleading to an offense, that will force him out of his house for months.
Feminists claim small acts like this inevitably lead to much bigger ones as their excuse for so changing what was acceptable except among a few boy scouts raised as manginas before, but their real motivation has been to further emasculated married or living together men re: their women, and specifically emascualate all or most sense of natural age old physcial dominance that she feels from him.
She can scream, taunt, push all his buttons, slap him, spit at him, cheat on him and taunt him about it, but if he so much as touches her or threatens to, and she dials 911, he’s arrested, night in jail, order of protection moving him out of his house for months, must spend thousands on a lawyer, must go back to court repeatedly to be badgered into pleading while she has to do no of this for even a false accusation and won’t be paid attention to for months when/if she tries to have the charges dropped including by admitting they were false because she was so upset and emotional, and all the while it’s a violation of the order of protection for him to so much as call, email or txt her in the most non threatening manner, about patching things up and how she can best get charges dropped or eventually blow over etc.
If there’s no or trivial and ambiguous physical evidence they won’t feel they can take it to trial so eventually charges will be dropped. But not if she’s got a trivial bruise on her face, despite her having punched him in the stomach four times first. They may give him the opportunity to press changes on her, finally, but then maybe she will testify for them, and since she’s so sorry by then, what good will it do.
That’s what feminists have given us under VAWA.
LikeLike
Doug.
No one should have the right to hit anyone, women or men. If I thought any man would ever physically harm me I would be away from him before you could say “lawsuit.” Physical Dominance can be arousing, but only when it’s consensual. Yes there is a thin line separating consent and non-consent, but I think everyone should err on the side of consent.
I don’t think any law should be repealed. Men hitting women is not right, period. The same way that women cheating on men isn’t right. The only difference is that men would never complain about being hit and abused by women because they want to appear manly. If the relationship is abusive on either end the other partner should leave period.
And abusive I mean physical violence lacking consent.
-S
LikeLike
svegliate
Slapping someone once is not physically harming them despite feminist lies and misdirection to the contrary.
Don’t let the door hit you in the rump on your way out.
Repeat VAWA.
LikeLike
The prior and still existing assault and battery law before VAWA was plenty, and reasonable.
VAWA isn’t.
LikeLike
What’s that? You’re not in the mood to go to brunch!?
*WHACK*
Did I or did I not tell you to tivo Lost!?
*WHACK*
Chicks think they can get away with everything.
LikeLike
No one should have the right to hit anyone, women or men.
Do you mean this as a sanctimonious hyperbole? Fine, if it makes your point, whatever it is.
I won’t comment on hitting women, but hitting another man: it should be an INALIENABLE RIGHT to hit another man if he’s insulted or threatened you.
Depending on the circumstances, a disrespectful or mouthy minor who is not your child should also be fair game for some kind of physical intimidation/slap, provided the strike is appropriate for his age/size.
LikeLike
svegliate
Pound sand.
Fine.
But with none of the alleged abuser’s money.
LikeLike
That was more than a stinging slap that a pain slap. The intent wasn’t really to really hurt her, but more to send the message that she was talking out of turn and she should stay in a child’s place. Lightning fast and accurate to keep a ho in check. That was a long way from “Drivin’ Miss Daisy”…
[editor: lol. now miss daisy… *whack*… i’m puttin’ you on notice.]
LikeLike
@caligula – wasn’t Willie Dynamite Gordon from Sesame Street?
LikeLike
Physical violence shows a lack of control that is not sexy. I would not want to be in any kind of relationship where for real and serious problems he thought the best way to communcicate was through violence. That is disturbing. It is not an alpha thing. A true alpha should be able to maintain control of the situation without resorting to violence.
[editor: but unfortunately a lot of women do fall under the spell of violent men. and the more violence, the more they fall it seems.]
When I see anyone engaged in violence my first thought is wow they weren’t man enough to solve the situation and keep it under control without using violence. Violence shows a lack of control.
[it also shows aggression, which, if the aggressor wins the battle, is a turn-on for women.]
Now consensual violence is another story, and the role violence can play in sexual fantasy is somehting that should be up to each person’s discretion. And if someone wants to choose to make it a part of their life-style outside of the bedroom consensually that’s fine.
[fantasy mirrors what we desire in reality.]
LikeLike
But fantasy is not reality.
[editor: fantasy is hyperreality.]
There is a difference.
[but the tingle stays the same.]
Just like someone can enjoy playing grand theft auto, someone can enjoy bedroom play, or even 24/7 play if that’s their choice. But in some way it’s not real because the women or the man for that matter always has an opportunity to leave.
[playing a video game where you shoot off an enemy’s head is not so far removed from our hindbrain thrill at vanquishing a real life enemy.]
Some men fall under the spell of females who use and abuse them and treat them like glorified stupid man candy. For all your argument that women like abuse, so do many men.
[i’ve heard of these men. but their numbers pale in comparison to how many women swoon for thuggish assholes.]
I can’t count how many guys I’ve seen that had abusive girlfriends emotionally but they didn’t want to leave them. Not because they were hot.
[but because these men were losers who could do no better in the open market.]
There were plenty of hot girls that these guys could have had, but because the girls that were bitchy to them seemed to be of higher value.
[i doubt your premise.]
This is true of friendships too, there are so many cases of friendships where one person is blatantly mean to another but the other sticks around anyways. Women falling under the spell of violent men isn’t a women thing, it’s a people thing.
[no it’s a woman thing. the papers are not filled with stories of men seeking the warm embrace of the female version of chris brown.]
Anyway the logic that because it works it’s right is faulty. I can con you and steal all your money, and you fell for it. So I guess it’s your fault.
[where did i write that is = ought? are you, too, going to insist on being one of the empty-headed haters who puts words in my mouth?]
LikeLike
The tingle does not stay the same for fantasy in reality.
[editor: if there were no psychic payoff they wouldn’t fantasize about it.]
Many women have rape fantasies. But I’m sure if they were really raped it would not be a pleasurable experience. That is because in your fantasy world you have control. Sure there is still a little bit of fear, but it is heavily controlled fear.
[from what i have heard women tell me, and reading between the lines of what they say, what distinguishes their rape fantasies from real life abhorrence is that the fantasy rapist is an alpha male. women feel arousal when contemplating complete submission to an overpowering sexy man wresting their sexuality from them against their willpower. in real life, a lot of rapists are low life losers whose degenerate gnarled seed would curse their wombs for eternity.]
People like Horror movies, that doesn’t mean they want to get murdered.
[but they do like to feel startled. or: some people also like skydiving, but that doesn’t mean that hitting the ground at terminal velocity is what draws them to jump out of planes.]
Same with grand theft auto. I’m sure some guys would like to pretend to be gangstas but if they had really had a gun and were pointing it at another person they would be having far less of a good time.
[depends on how much they hated the person they were pointing the gun at. personally, if i was pointing a gun at a filthy low life who attempted to mug me, i’d feel pretty darn skippy in that situation.]
It wasn’t clear from your posts whether you approved or not.
[i describe reality as it is. people project their discomfort with that onto me. they’d rather create a beastly scapegoat than surrender their pretty lies.]
I’m not so empty headed as to realize that this isn’t provocative satire at it’s heart. But every joke has a grain of truth in it. I am glad that you don’t approve of hitting women.
[i’m a lover, not a fighter. however, whenever i hear women say that their rape fantasies don’t reflect reality, i’m tempted to call them out for disingenuousness. women fantasize about a lot of things that no one argues doesn’t reflect reality if that reality were an option. what woman wouldn’t truly want to be a princess who gets swept off her feet by a prince living in a castle? what woman wouldn’t sleep with johnny depp if he propositioned her? these are common fantasies of women which they never argue aren’t reflections of how they wish reality were. so why should i grant a plenary indulgence to rape fantasies? how is it that a rape fantasy is the one glaring exception to the reality-reflection rule? men also fantasize about stuff like threesomes with supermodels. would you argue that men don’t actually want threesomes with supermodels in reality, if having them were possible? no, of course not.
i think the truth of the matter is much more disturbing. rape fantasies with the *right* archetype of man not only turn on women in mindspace, but would turn them on in meatspace as well.]
LikeLike
svegliate–
I too doubt your premise to a large degree.
But there is a dynamic that’s real that you’ve observed, but aren’t understanding right.
What happens is that these women tend to strip away elements of their bf’s self esteem esp. with respect to getting attractive women in some combination of an instinctive and guided by what they feel working, and knowing calculating way. Having seen modeling behavior by e.g. their mothers can also have been instructive. Their purpose is some combination of the charge some women get in dominating a man that cares for them and will serve them, and making it less likely that a too attractive for her really, all in, man who’s in her orbit won’t leave in part because he won’t think he can really do better, or is insecure about that. At the same time many of these would like to play with macho men on the down low usually, if they can.
She’s working to increase his submissiveness to her which has these effects.
When women really go after this there are far fewer, approaching no, cultural / legal legal constraints on her taking it very far. See some femdom sites to get a clear idea of the dynamics, which no usually aren’t that clear headed and determined to take it to extremes as those kinds of sites are.
Of course the hyper feminism that’s prevalent all through the left of center in the US (and affects the center as well, and not just through feminist laws) provides a strongly supporting background for this.
It’s appalling.
LikeLike
Women who end up with abusers seek them out because they are abusers.
LikeLike
svegliate–
Tell me she didn’t find it an enjoyable experience.
http://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/great-scenes-of-game-in-the-movies-5/#comment-166151
Tell me this is unrealistic w/a man like Clint, and a prior exchange like they had.
Grow up and throw off some ideology, girly.
LikeLike
Doug1–
Armed w/a gun I could kill someone who I thought was about to kill me or seriously harm a girl I cared for in a New York second, stone cold steady. Count on it.
LikeLike
This is nothing compared to what I’ve seen in real life.
Not too long ago a friend and I where looking for a place to eat after our shift (during the day) Well we drive up to this fast food place and just decide to eat inside.
Well, we get inside and find some guy (thuggish lookin man) arguing with his girlfriend.(Note:they are white)
Everyone is just looking them battling it out with heated fists of insults.( This happened for about 30 seconds) Then finally, the guy just snaps and..
WHACK!! right across the face.
*My jaw dropped. (I mean, this is in public. Who the fuck does this?)*
The girl then covered her face and looked back at him bemused.
Well the cops come and arrest the guy but she just kept screaming, “Let him go!! Let him go!! Its not his fault!”
I’m pretty sure she didn’t press any charges….for the gina tingles.
LikeLike
@ sveligate
I think you—like many women and manginas—greatly misunderstand violence…and by extension the nature and utility of certain kinds of male power. Put simply, the resort to violence is a masculine way of solving problems. That a monopoly on violence has been assumed by the state in modern times does not change this fact one iota.
Case in point: an evening out at a bar last year turned into a confrontation with a trashy, drunken bitch and her beta orbiter. We jawed back and forth, until the whore referred to the girl I was with as cunt and then struck me twice. After forcibly depositing her in a nearby bush, I was then set upon by her beta orbiter…who I then choked before breaking his nose. No one watching had any problem with this. I’m 6’1, 200 lbs, about 9 percent body fat, and from a really rough area of Chicago—so yeah, violence is nearly always an option as far as I’m concerned. We’d tried shit talking and walking, but in the end those clowns left me little option.
Violence is just one tool among many that men use to resolve a situation—real men understand this and so they tend find solutions that preclude violence…but remain at the ready if it needs to occur. Women love and respect this—my girl’s snatch didn’t stop dripping the whole night after that. The swift, targeted, stone-cold use of violence is the most readily identifiable alpha trait—bar none. It is the quintessential male power, and the aura of a man capable of projecting it (albeit sparingly) is absolutely a turn for the weaker sex, and definitely something worth cultivating.
Violence employed as sadism or as an instrument of cruelty can properly be considered beta in many cases. But violence deployed to establish and solidify social hierarchies or solve an otherwise intractable problem is absolutely alpha—all the more so because of the prohibition placed on this particular kind of male power by modern society.
[editor: this comment ftw. though i’d argue that cruel and sadistic violence is not beta, but primarily the domain of alphas. betas don’t have the sack for violent sadism.]
LikeLike
I totally agree with dragnet above.
LikeLike
A agree w/Dragnet above too.
I also agree w/Roissy’s addendum. Except to note that going too far in that direction while not beta, no, is dysfunctional and does need to be effective constained. The cruel part esp. What’s meant by sadism certainly has a common core but it can vary between only consensual limited sadism that’s also meant to bring satisfaction to it’s recipient, or the thoroughly cruel, enjoying pure suffering kind. so it’s the cruel that’s the primary dysfunction.
LikeLike
Dragnet said it the best.
LikeLike
The core takeaway from all this I think, is that the utter taboo that feminists have created about men in even the most minor way “laying a hand on a woman” in any way at all, no matter what provocation or what else she did beforehand, and gotten male supported in some elite quarters out of extreme notions of English gentlemanliness and male chivalry, was 1) NOT really designed to prevent some “rising epidemic of domestic violence” as they claimed by sheer massive feminist lying, or to prevent some claimed again by massive lying inevitable slide into truly serious violence or even maiming and killing her (yuup that was all heard in the campaign for VAWA), but 2) INSTEAD a feminist campaign to fundamental emasculate a sense by female and male partners alike, of male physical dominance over his woman.
It was and is an emasculation male dominance over his lover campaign, riding under the banner of protecting women from fearsome violence. The assault and battery laws did and still do punish any real violence against women. The domestic violence laws are solely there to punish phony, made up by angry female lovers, and trivial acts of male physical dominance that she wants to punish or be able to, to wrest control.
I will say in ending that men from Latin cultures (including in America as the push for VAWA was steamrolling) rarely share in this concept of total taboo over ever in any way striking a woman, no matter what. Though they too agree that only a no class brute will regularly brutalize a woman. It was Jews and WASP men who most signed on.
LikeLike
“Tell me this is unrealistic w/a man like Clint, and a prior exchange like they had.
Grow up and throw off some ideology, girly.”
I don’t understand your point. In that clip I see no physical violence, only verbal altercation which is of course hot. But’s hot not because the man is “beating” down the women verbally, but because he is parrying with her. He isn’t putting her down, but challenging her. There is a difference and it is hard for some guys to grasp, but it makes all the difference
Let’s try and have a civil conversation, boy-o. 😉
“man who’s in her orbit won’t leave in part because he won’t think he can really do better, or is insecure about that. At the same time many of these would like to play with macho men on the down low usually, if they can.”
That’s a part of it certainly. But it’s also partially that everyone, guys and girls included values people who don’t value them, at least not too much. People want to work for friendships and things in life, if it comes to easy people don’t believe it’s real.
I’m not saying that this means that men want to be dominated. Far from it. But they do want to know that they had to work to earn their gal’s trust and love. They often choose bitchiness as an indicator to this.
“We jawed back and forth, until the whore referred to the girl I was with as cunt and then struck me twice. After forcibly depositing her in a nearby bush, I was then set upon by her beta orbiter…who I then choked before breaking his nose.”
See I wouldn’t want a guy who would take me to a club with girls that would call me a cunt. I would hope that he would have better taste than to hang around people like that. But accidents happen I suppose, people get drunk. If that situation were to happen to me, I would like my ideal guy to smile, joke about how ridiculous those weirdos were being turn and leave taking me to a safer local. Possibly throwing in a brilliantly scathing witty rejoinder.
“The swift, targeted, stone-cold use of violence is the most readily identifiable alpha trait—bar none.”
If swift-stone cold violence was your specialty than of course you would say that, because the girls you attract will be the kind who are attracted to that.
But I think most would rather have a guy who showed is dominance is subtler ways.
Doug1:
See some femdom sites to get a clear idea of the dynamics, which no usually aren’t that clear headed and determined to take it to extremes as those kinds of sites are.
Lots of those guys will pay women good money to dominate them. They could pay probably less to get a women to submit to them, but they are paying to get women to dominate them. As for the extremes of the sites. I have explored both sides of the internet’s dom/sub culture. There is just as extreme M/f as there is F/m.”
Although you may not be attracted to dominate women there are men that are. And that doesn’t make them wrong or bad because of it. It’s a sexual preference. It’s not my cup of tea, and not what I find appealing, but it does exists and it’s not so much in the minority as one would believe. If that is what they seek out and want than I see no problem with it as long as it is done in a consensual and safe way.
“from what i have heard women tell me, and reading between the lines of what they say, what distinguishes their rape fantasies from real life abhorrence is that the fantasy rapist is an alpha male.”
If the women wants it than it isn’t rape. If a male is alpha enough she will want to be with him. Ergo it won’t be rape, but living the /fantasy/ of rape. The problem is vocalizing want and consent. A women may want to be have the fantasy of being taken, but this is only with a man that she would already want. The problem is understanding consent. Guys I don’t care how good you are at reading women, you can’t read our minds. Yes there is the possibility that we are protesting because we actually like you a lot and are just trying to live the fantasy , but it is also equally possible that we actually don’t like you or don’t feel comfortable.
[editor: this is somewhat semantical. rape fantasies are about rape (i.e. the woman is taken forcibly against her will), but the man doing it is attractive/powerful/alpha enough to her that it doesn’t trigger her instinctual revulsion of being impregnated by beta seed.]
The key is if we REALLY like you we’ll respect you enough to know that we have to convince you that we want you before we can live out our fantasy that we don’t.
My impression is that real alpha males have enough girls that want to be with them that they don’t need to force the ones that don’t want to be with them.
[despite what you may hear from the looney-toon brigade, game has nothing to do with forcing women to do something they don’t want to do.]
LikeLike
[ to her that it doesn’t trigger her instinctual revulsion of being impregnated by beta seed.]
The revulsion isn’t because the man is Beta. It could be because she doesn’t trust the Alpha, or because he isn’t listening to her when she wants him to. She is afraid he is using her etc etc. (Why does the MM have a whole step of comfort if it wasn’t a factor.) Arousal isn’t all that matters when getting women into bed, it’s the number one sticking point for most men because it’s a lot harder to achieve than comfort, but comfort is just as important.
[editor: you’re arguing two different points. yes, comfort is important. it is, in fact, the longest stage of seduction. any man who is good with women will tell you that. however, the deep gut revulsion that rises like bile in a woman’s throat is reserved for betas, because the greatest threat to her reproductive prerogative is being impregnated by unworthy seed.]
LikeLike
Also how can it be against her will if she wants it?
I don’t see how that works out.
[editor: it’s not a question of wanting it. it’s better understood as a helpless surrender to her overpowering desire once she is in the throes of being forcibly taken.]
LikeLike
cutty’s slap was better
LikeLike
Say you have a compelling reason, like you’re in a relationship with your partner for five years at the time. You definitely don’t want it.
The reason you don’t want it, while compelling, has nothing to with sexual attraction. You would never consciously allow it to happen.
This analogy goes some way to explaining this dichotomy. It’s against her will, but she wants it.
Capiche?
LikeLike
@ svegliate
That you miss the point entirely does not surprise me in the least. You are making a critical mistake—the implicit assumption that somehow a man cannot have both alpha and beta qualities. The ideal man is really a combination of the two—which I displayed in ample measure outside the bar (a fairly upscale Boston establishment, btw). I engaged in dialogue (beta) with both parties—something at which I excel…but when this proved unsuccessful I moved quickly to smash them both (alpha).
Stop looking at violence as inherently evil or distasteful, which is what you are doing. Instead, look at it as one of many tools a man should have at his disposal. When my sharp, witty dialogue tool was insufficient to stave off conflict (as can happen to any guy, no matter how nimble-minded) I then deployed the tool of violence. The fact that my opponent and his woman could not also readily avail themselves of this tool is entirely irrelevant. In that scenario, it was the very defintion of beta—and hence, undesirable in the extreme.
I would rather demonstrate my dominance in subtler ways—most people would. And I absolutely did in that scenario…which is why it escalated to violence—my opponents supposed to move the struggle onto ground where they assumed they could prevail. Alcohol likely fueled this unfortunate misconception. The fact that they were mistaken is not evidence of my inability to display social dominance in a more subtle manner.
And stone-cold violence doesn’t have to be a “specialty” to be a part of a man’s toolbox—these can only be the words of someone who has never engaged in any sort of physical conflict. You really only need one thing: a deeply ingrained knowledge that you can take it. I obtained this knowledge early from my environs…but it’s not too late for adult men to acquire this. Lift weights for a bit and then take/dish a few punches at your local boxing gym. It does wonders for a man to realize he’s not made of glass.
In any case, I don’t think you understand men…or women, for that matter. I’m done with you.
LikeLike
“Let’s try and have a civil conversation, boy-o. 😉 ”
that right there is why bitches get hit
LikeLike
women want to be RAVISHED (by a handsome alpha stranger) not RAPED (by an icky schvoogie)
LikeLike
In honest accounts by rape victims, quite a few of them have reported that they, or at least their bodies, were strongly turned on. Not the majority of victims, of course, and many of those who responded physically were not pleased about it mentally. I imagine the cognitive dissonance of having a resisting mind and a wet pussy must be bewildering.
LikeLike
@Doug1
A spot-on observation, in my view, that has had reveberations far and wide. But let’s be honest—beta males had a role in this as well. After all, it was never men generally who wielded even physical power over the womenfolk—it was alphas who wielded disproportionate physical and sexual power over their harems. Most betas never got a chance to exercise violence against women, because the large majority of them never got to mate. The imposition of the taboo around violence by empowering the state would have benefited betas in addition to women, as betas would now be able to physically stand up to the somewhat neutered alphas…all the while women were using the empowered state to make themselves less dependent on any sort of man, alpha or beta. The betas thought that circumscribing alpha physical dominance would give them better access to pussy, but this was not to be. In my view, this is one of the key masterstrokes of feminism—credit where credit is due.
The ramifications of this are still being felt—just ask Tiger Woods, for example. His wife beat the shit out of him with a golf club for chrissakes—wherefore is she not fallen down, slain by his hand? (Or at least subject to social sanction). Well, because we’ve concentrated this particualr alpha male power in the hands of the state—leaving women free to violate this particular social contract (the prohibition on intersex violence) while men remain bound by it. The state is now alpha by proxy.
Which is why most alpha violence is left to men from communities outside the mainstream (ie, ethnic & religious minorities). These men have little to fear from prison, as they are hardened enough to handle it but everything to gain by the exercise of violence and the status it brings. Defiance of the distant uber-alpha of the state is a key to their alpha character.
And is why I had to do what I did outside of that bar, although I didn’t know it at the time. It wasn’t just that my girl was verbally assaulted and I physically attacked—it was necessary to respond with force precisely because I was forbidden to exercise this alpha power by cultural and legal strictures. It was imperative that I claim physical dominance over those that challenged me, and by extension, assert dominance over my lover. To my surprise at the time no one present objected, and the pussy tingle gripped my woman with a merciless energy, her thrist for my seed—fully quenched only hours before—now revitalized, unslakeable to the point of near insatiability.
LikeLike
I would not make too much of the fact that women often lube up while experiencing un-wanted penetration. Consider that guys, especially young ones, routinely get boners while being fondled by an un-wanted groper. This fact has propelled many a village Priest into deep delusion about what the terrified and disgusted boys in their grip really were really thinking.
Boners & moist-pussys are both pretty non-specific responses to a variety of circumstances.
LikeLike
Pimp gets bitch slapped.
LikeLike
Do you have a reliable source where I can read more about these accounts? I would think beyond bewildering into total mindwarp. Self-disgust and shame, for one.
What puzzles me is why don’t men feel something analogous to this when they sleep with someone they don’t like?
LikeLike
What do you guys make of this study:
“In environments where disease is rampant and the child-mortality rate is high, women prefer masculine men. In places like America and Britain, where knowing how to analyse health-care plans is more important than fighting off infection, effeminate men are just as competitive.
To test their thesis, Dr Jones and Dr DeBruine showed around 4,800 women from 30 countries 20 pairs of faces, in their online laboratory, faceresearch.org. The faces were masculinised and feminised versions of the same features. The women, who were all Caucasian in order to control for racial differences, were asked to rate each face for its attractiveness. The results allowed the researchers to calculate an average “masculinity preference” for women from the countries in question.
Having done so, they compared their results with national-health indicators in each of those countries, including child mortality, life expectancy and the prevalence of communicable disease. Since there is a strong correlation between these variables and a country’s wealth, they controlled for GNP per head by measuring whether it alone accounted for the difference in mating strategy. They also tried to control for cultural factors using a questionnaire called the sociosexual orientation inventory index, which measures differences in mating patterns across cultures—specifically whether women prefer long- or short-term relationships.
Neither wealth nor mating pattern had much impact on women’s preferences for manly men. Disease rates, by contrast, seemed to be directly related to how they went about choosing a mate—the healthier the society, the less women valued masculinity. Hygiene and wimps, it seems, go hand in hand.”
LikeLike
ahappinessexperiment–
This is the kind of feminist leftist crap that too often passes for science these days.
The places they characterized as important and causitive in their study for lower disease rates were also place with vastly higher rates of feminist indoctrination.
I posit to you that it’s feminist in doctrination that leads women to choose effeminate men, and for effeminitate men to be a much larger part of the available pool of men to choose between. Further I posit that these feminist men are being chosen primarily as woman lead partners in marriage and child rearing, lead strongly or subtly, while these same feminist indoctrinated women tended to ride as much of the alpha cock carousel and their looks and remaining allegance to more traditonal American culture would allow. Further , if the later is weak enough, their real hope is alpha cuckolded babies raised by wife lead and easy to live with and control effeminate male.
Towards indoctrinated consensual cuckoldry, an avant guard of current feminism marches!!!
Violently and militarily overthrow this feminist march, and feminism, if that’s what it takes men. Hopefully not.
LikeLike
Cannon, I was thinking the same:
LikeLike
Bhetti says, “What puzzles me is why don’t men feel something analogous to this when they sleep with someone they don’t like?”
They do. One day when the incidents are far enough behind in our crew’s history that it doesn’t make me wretch to think about, I’ll tell you the story of Apple-tits.
Think of every bad stereotype about fat chicks, incarnate. She is responsible for a kind of rule we made to select while sober, and not allow any new additions to the pool of possibilities after drinking begins.
This is not a situation where there is underlying secret desire (as there would be with a fat chick who had a pretty face and a positive personality) that pops out or goes primal with lowered inhibitions. This chick is disgusting from start to finish, but taking advantage of a guy’s drunkenness, and jumping on a guy’s cock until he closes his eyes and does it out of something like pity.
Once I actually started listening to my bros, this was one of the things that scared me “straight”. It even changed my style.
I used to be more assertive and proactive (read consensually sexually predatory) before I found out that a guy can get a kind of fear-confusion erection from a woman punking him. He might think that he wants it at the time, but he feels dirty afterwards.
This is not an excuse, just an explanation. This sort of situation can be fun for the woman in its way, but it is taking advantage of overlapping social and physical hierarchy and gender roles in humans. An aggressive female doesn’t really need to be pretty or even all that clean to “muscle” her way into some prissy dingaling for the same reason women enjoy “ravishing”. They’re released from any responsibility.
However, it’s not a sustainable way to make relationships for women who may be exceptionally physically strong for females, but are feminine in character. The relatively strong woman has to understand her position.
Nasty girls, probably by definition, have no understanding of that. Unless they’re passably hot, and sometimes even then, no sane man really gets deep enjoyment from shagging them. Sometimes what they’re feeling is a kind of displeasure, but reacting physically to being near forcibly stimulated.
LikeLike
Beta of the century: http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2010/04/jacoby_smith_be.php
LikeLike
Slap that ho!
http://www.aeonity.com/ab/games/simulation/slap-that-ho.php
LikeLike
Morgan freeman has balls to be bitch slapping a chick in front of Clark Kent.
LikeLike
I had a guy try to carjack me once. Even if you’re protecting yourself or morally in the right, the predominant feeling is a huge adrenaline rush. Kinda hard to explain, but it’s surreal. Nothing hurts, everything sounds funny, and the entire world blacks out except for your target who becomes your sole focus.
Cops and FBI agents have to be trained to turn their heads to look around because you get tunnel vision when fight or flight seriously kicks in.
I wouldn’t say it’s a *good* feeling, but it is kind of addictive, and you get a rush if you win.
LikeLike
Yessssh!
LikeLike
David Alexander bitch slaps Al Pacino:
LikeLike
Bitch better have my money!!! 🙂
LikeLike
The Cutty bitchslap was planned so it was not better. Morgan did it in the moment and it worked.
I like how all these examples are of non-white men, yet I am assuming the demographic here is the opposite. Just saying.
Discuss…
LikeLike
Sean Connery:
LikeLike
Hahahhaa, nice!
LikeLike
[img]http://www.icanhasmotivation.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/slapabitch.jpg[/img]
LikeLike