Two women, to be precise. In a new book called “Stop Calling Him Honey… And Start Having Sex”, the two female authors dispense relationship advice that could have been lifted straight from the Chateau files. (Maybe they have?) For instance, they write that pet names are a surefire way to kill the sexual tension in a relationship.
Pet names — “honey,” “darling,” “super-snuggly-puggly,” whatever — need to be expunged from a couple’s vocabulary.
Calling your spouse your “pookie” or “huggums” flips a switch in the subconscious, and suddenly your husband or wife is no longer that hot, sensual creature you once lusted after.
“It turns people into an asexual, cuddly teddy-bear toy that you want to spoon with and watch funny movies with and drink hot chocolate with,” says Davis, “but it doesn’t make you want toshag them!
“When you first meet someone, you’re hot for them,” she adds. “You’re not going to be calling up, going, ‘Hi, Pookie Wookie, what do you want to do later?’ No, you’re going to be calling up and going ‘Hey, Richard, so what do you want to do?’
While researching their book, Davis and Arana say they found an interesting pattern: the worse the pet names used by a couple, the worse their sex lives were.
In turn, the couples that didn’t use them tended to have healthier sex lives.
Mostly agreed. Goofy, cutesy pet names or perfunctory rote designations like “honey” that are meant to serve as expedient shorthand for validating relationship stability are sexual tension killers. It’s better to give her a sexy, slightly demeaning nickname like, oh, “slut”, and for her to call you by your manly real name. The only acceptable nicknames that she may call you are “stud”, “daddy” or “Prince of Penises”.
The Chateau has written before about giving nicknames — as opposed to pet names — to lovers:
Nicknames are great. They establish the proper paternalistic male – frivolous female dynamic that is the foundation of all successful and happy romantic relationships. Plus, they objectify women, and almost all women, contrary to the shrieks of dusty muffed feminists everywhere, harbor a secret desire to be objectified by condescending men. Imagine a cock slapping a chick’s face… forever. (plz to make animated gif.)
So you should always give women nicknames, preferably more than one to suit whatever happens to be the occasion.
Some of my personal favorites:
Lovechop.
Little Miss Muffin.
Showgirl.
Sugar Walls.
Miss Minx.
Princess Peach Pit.
Puss n Boobs.
Tits Ahoy.
Twinkletits.
Jujube.
Cock Envelope.
Queef Latifah.
Ho.
Good rule of thumb: the hotter the chick, the sluttier the nickname. It’s imperative that you sexualize a hot girlfriend soon after beginning to date her. Hot chicks have huge egos and crave a man who will bring them down to earth. This bringing down to earth process involves basically treating her like a convenient wet hole.
I’d steer clear of granting mushy or sexual nicknames to girls on first dates. That’s a fast track to disqualifying yourself as a needy pervert. Those are best saved for later on. Early game chicknames should be more teasing, less sexual. Like calling her Red Carpet when she shows up overdressed to an event, or Grace Kelly when she trips on the sidewalk.
You’ll notice that, for the most part, the Chateau-recommended nicknames are sexual, and somewhat degrading, in nature. And that they are strictly a one-way nomenclature. So the next time your chick calls you “honey”, don’t insta-reply with your own “honey”. Instead, gently remind her to call you by your blood and soil name. Swing a halberd overhead for good measure.
Continuing with the subject of this post, the two broads also say:
Still, the authors say, pet names — and their insidious cousin “baby talk” — are merely symptoms of a greater problem: the “roommate syndrome.”
On its surface, the roommate syndrome might sound like a decent partnership: Spouses do everything together and share all the same friends, interests and beliefs.
“We all have this romantic idea, the whole Cinderella thing,” says Davis. “‘Oh, I’m going to meet my Prince Charming and we are going to talk about everything together and be together all the time. We’re never going to argue. We’re going to do absolutely everything in front of one another. We’re just going to be so close.'”
A bad arrangement, she says.
“A couple years down the road, you’ve done everything together, you doing everything together, you’ve agreed with everything and frankly you look at the other person and you think, ‘Now what? I’m kind of bored because basically I’m talking to myself. I’m with myself, I’m with the other half of myself.'”
And that’s when the physical part of the relationship leaves town.
Baby talk is OK, as long as it is the woman feeling a compulsion to speak that way when in the private company of her man. Any man using baby talk with his woman should lop — or rather, daintily snip — his balls off and mail them to a scientific lab to be studied under an electron microscope for possible application in nanotechnology.
The fact is, women regress to a vulnerable child-like state when all their sexual buttons are being pressed by a man they love. Baby talk is a natural extension of this WIL regression to a submissive childhood mentality. It can get a little annoying for a man to hear this type of talk too much, so women would be wise to check themselves before they wreck themselves.
Where the authors are correct is in pinpointing the roommate syndrome as a leading cause of bed death. The hottest, most sexually satisfying relationships are never with lovers who are your carbon copy. A good lover isn’t so different that you can’t stand each other and hate their hobbies, but neither is he or she so similar that you can predict their every dull move. Since we know that hypergamous, non-harem mentality women get bored more quickly with relationships (66-80%+ of divorces initiated by women, and most LTRs ended by women), it stands to reason that if you want a long-lived marriage or LTR you should aim for girls who:
a. close and lock the fucking bathroom door when they take a dump, and
You should also be worried if you haven’t had an argument with your GF or wife in the past year.
You might want to reconsider moving in together, as well. Or, if you do so, to at least have a separate study where you can occasionally get out of her sight, and vice versa.
Moving along, the authors write:
“Sex is the glue that brings us together,” says Arana. “Whenever we heard a couple say, ‘We spend all of our time together, and we never argue.’ Those were the couples we found in our research that, yeah, they never argued and they spent all their time together, but they weren’t having sex either.”
Those are the relationships, Arana adds, that are the most vulnerable.
They’re right. Have an argument, save your sex life. Generations of credential-waving, platitude-spouting fembot marriage counselors and therapists have had their lives’ work reduced to less value than the paper their worthless degrees are printed on by avatars of real world experience such as yer ‘umble narrators of this blog.
Here is some more shockingly useful advice from these two women:
Close the bathroom door.
No using the potty in front of your spouse, ever.
“You want to check yourself,” says Davis. “Would I have [used the bathroom] in front of my partner at the beginning of the relationship? No way! No way would you have done that.”
No man wants to hear the toilet water kerplunk when his beloved’s stool escapes her anus. This is true for women as well… that is, women don’t even want to hear their own stool kerplunk. Women are a bit more forgiving than men are about hearing their lover’s kerplunks, because a gruff, gross animalistic man is a turn-on for women, in measured doses.
Argue more.
This is not fighting, but holding your ground, keeping your own opinions and engaging in some playful arguments.
“It’s just about keeping an opinion, and even flirting a bit with banter, Katharine Hepburnish kind of banter,” says Arana. “A lot of couples don’t do it. They are so afraid of a difference of opinion.”
Nah, arguing is fighting. No need to prettify it. They’re right on the whole, though. A beta male’s biggest shortcoming is his fear of offending his woman. Hey betas, newsflash: women WANT you to offend them. Not all the time, of course. But enough times that she is helpfully reminded of the alpha male she wants to believe you are. Sexual tension can be ramped up to incredible heights by edgy, borderline insulting banter.
Have your own friends, interests and life.
“We don’t mean go off and have a separate life or not communicate with your partner, but you need to constantly keep growing as an individual,” says Arana. “Why not take an evening class if it’s something you’re interested in?
“You have to keep growing as an individual and then bring that back to the relationship.”
See: Poon Commandment III. The Chateau is well ahead of you, ladies.
Build a few walls.
Keep things close to the vest a bit. Don’t share everything that goes through your mind, especially sexual desires.
“You have to maintain a little bit of mystery,” says Davis.
Mystery, unpredictability, dread. All these male traits and behaviors — learned or organic — conspire to make a woman tingle so hard for you that she can’t think straight. It’s a superdose, superinjection of dopaminx right into her limbic clitoris.
In short, don’t become her best friend. Become her best lover.
If you’re wondering… yes, they are mutually exclusive.
***
I’ve noticed a trend lately of books and articles written by women that are plagiarizing borrowing from the themes espoused daily on this blog. Smart women — realistic women, and probably women who have been burned by stupidly banal relationship advice one too many times — are coming around to the everlasting fountain of wisdom and truth that is the Chateau. They don’t say it with quite the same.. verve… that we do here, but their message is beginning to converge with the Chateau’s message.
To that I say, welcome ladies! Your left eyes are better.

1st
LikeLike
Ha! Two women who understand male psychology! Even the provider-lover, affectionate-sexual distinctions I’d say. Thee is hope 😉
LikeLike
Newcomer ladies should know the “left eyes are better” reference is to the idea that a man on Facebook should never praise a woman’s photo as beautiful but say something like “your left eye is better”. She’ll like him better than the guys who fawn on her.
LikeLike
The only time you should hear her pooping is if she is doing it on your chest.
Cakefart.com
LikeLike
Good thoughts from those gals. Does seem pretty uncommon to see practical insight from women.
Agree with your nicknames-over-pet-names tack, Roissy, and especially like the “build a few walls” recommendation from the article writers. Just put a post up on that last one here:
http://www.girlschase.com/content/secret-lover
Basically, the gist is, DON’T meet a girl’s friends or family, like… at all. Frees you of meddling, frees you from people asking her how your relationship, frees you from all the things that aren’t all that great about public relationships.
Keeping those walls up makes a big difference.
Chase
LikeLike
That’s good that women are being more realistic w/ dating advice. A lot of betas will take probably a book more seriously considering two women wrote it
LikeLike
“The only acceptable nicknames that she may call you are “stud”, “daddy” or “Prince of Penises”.”
Don’t forget “Stallion”
LikeLike
I’m from the Ross Jeffries old school before there was an “internet”. Used a whole bunch of cool NLP hypnotic techniques to break a womans defenses and create rapport, however, reading your blog the last 4 months has been 10 TIMES more effective than that stuff.
I came here looking for answers after witnesses another LTR slip slowly and uncontrollably into an abysmal hell of nagging, arguing, and little to no sex. I even caught myself slipping into the frame that the above mentioned female authors described and began using the baby talk.
After a big argument over a vacation that went I packed my bags and WALKED OUT. I was ready to start a new life and I didnt care anymore. Her reaction astonished me. She broke down in tears and told she “needed me”.
I came back but I came to this blog looking for some serious answers. I read everything down to obscure archives going back 3 years.
I started to playfully banter with her, called her sexually degrading names, and generally started to ACT the part of the alpha which is not really hard for me to do. I work in law enforcement and looking back its astonishing just how betaized I had become in relationships.
The sex is much hotter and frequent, the arguments are no longer a cross to bear but just a way to playfully show her my machismo, and there is a sparkle in her eye.
LikeLike
One of the first things that stuck in my head back in the old days of reading alt.seduction.fast is to ask a girl what her stripper name would be. Then start calling her that.
It works beautifully.
The only exception is if she actually is a stripper. I’ve dated a few strippers and they hate hearing that name from a guy they actually like.
LikeLike
Holy crap.
Women said this?
I think I just saw a pig zoom past.
LikeLike
If Roissy doesn’t put out a book soon others will continue to capitalize on his ideas. You write well and your voice is unique. Strike while the iron is hot!
LikeLike
[…] it sounds like. Which is one reason why I roared with laughter when I read the following on the Château this morning: Any man using baby talk with his woman should lop — or rather, daintily snip — […]
LikeLike
I only have one speed: ‘Go’.
LikeLike
Brilliant post. First one in a while that had me both laughing out loud and nodding in agreement in one fell swoop.
LikeLike
“Any man using baby talk with his woman should lop — or rather, daintily snip — his balls off and mail them to a scientific lab to be studied under an electron microscope for possible application in nanotechnology.
I need a new keyboard.
LikeLike
Alpha
LikeLike
@anonymouscoolneg
I work in law enforcement and looking back its astonishing just how betaized I had become in relationships.
The cops I know are among the most beta men with their women. They’re Alpha for the pickup, and then beta for the keeping.
The sex is much hotter and frequent, the arguments are no longer a cross to bear but just a way to playfully show her my machismo, and there is a sparkle in her eye.
My SO says in public, “Gorbachev loves me more than anything.”
My cast-aside response:
“Some women are masters at self-deception.”
In public three weeks ago, in earshot of SO:
Old man and lady couple: “Your wife (sic) has a great figure.”
Me: “You should see what she does with it.”
SO: Shocked look.
Me: “Come on, hot cheeks, let’s go chat with Douchebag Guy From Work.”
In bed, pre-sleep some time last month:
“You told me you loved me.”
“I meant I love your ass.”
“You only want my ass.”
“I appreciate a fine ass. I like to sample generously.”
Best line ever, though I admit I stole it (see if you know the reference):
“I love you.”
(casual, dismissive tone): “I know” (walk away)
One of her friends told her I seemed like a but of a jerk sometimes.
She went on for 15 minutes about how sweet and generous and charming and wonderful I was.
Seriously, keep it on a rolling boil and I wonder how long I can keep the sweet juices flowing? The rest of my life?
LikeLike
And it doesn’t matter how bad she wants to save the planet, it would better for my image of her if she flushes after doing number 1 instead of “letting it mellow.”
LikeLike
@Gorbachev
Nice line, Solo.
LikeLike
Building upon the Chateau, if your girl ever starts calling you these “endearing” names, the one surefire way to end that right away is make fun of her for calling you it and then responding with a big ole’ asshole nickname of your own for her.
I’ve done it before just out of pure reflex. I hate being called those names. Playful flirting, wrestling, and hot sex followed.
LikeLike
And don’t try this at home.
LikeLike
A man must have his own life, his own pursuits and social sphere, or there’ll be nothing left of him if/when it all ends. Manipulation comes when one side lets the other know that they “make them whole”.
In short, don’t become her best friend. Become her best lover.
I agree. A *best friend* is someone you can express vulnerability around – the person with whom doing so wouldn’t kill any tingles.
I also choose to take the terms “blood and soil” right out of context.
LikeLike
I don’t think it’s so much nicknames that kill the “spark” as it is the fact that you inevitably grow tired of hittin’ the same chick. I don’t care how hot your GF is, after a few months, you’ll have the urge to seek out new conquests. You’ll find yourself sitting in a lounge across from another couple one night, and you’ll be eyeing his date, and he’ll be eyeing yours. Then you’ll make eye contact with the other guy and reach a tacit agreement through eye contact that any reasonable man would:
“TRADE!!!”
Too bad the girls usually won’t go along with the plan.
LikeLike
There comes a point in a relationship where the girl will start dropping “darlings” or “honeys” in a sentence, just to test you. It even has that sort of pre-conceived non natural flow. Not that that’s a bad thing, I’ve done both the “who are you talking to?” thing and plain ignoring the sentiment. But there seems to be a general moment in a relationship where the girl starts dropping affection names. just sayin..
LikeLike
@Dan
@Gorbachev
Nice line, Solo.
You get the prize.
And it’s a damned good line.
LikeLike
“The only acceptable nicknames that she may call you are “stud”, “daddy” or “Prince of Penises”.”
There’s a few other ones that have all been lovingly placed upon mine identity by a number of giggly WIL’s.
– Cowboy
– Sailor
– Sheriff
– Commodore
– Captain
LikeLike
it is not that uncommon to find useful advice from women. Older women, raised in other historical circunstances, may be even better than some men their own age and most younger men at giving advice about the female mind.
LikeLike
Speaking of “I know”, think how much we can know about George given its back ground.
“At least Ford acknowledges that this was a great line. He and director Irvin Kershner fought Lucas for it. “Film is a collaborative process. I’m happy that I was able to make a small contribution. It didn’t go down so well with George at the time. He would have been a lot happier with the scripted line, which is ‘I love you, too,’ but I felt, and Kersh agreed, that there was the opportunity for a more character ‘smelling’ moment. So we shot that among other versions. We did shoot ‘I love you, too,’ but when Kersh presented his cut, he used the line ‘I know.’ George said, ‘That’s gonna get a laugh. That’s not good.’ Kersh and I both said, ‘It could be a good laugh at that moment.’ ”
I wonder how many miseries Star War geeks were spared to have at least one good reference of character for male potency despite the efforts of chinless George look for ass (but can’t find it).
If only Star Wars Light and Magic studios tech had fallen into the lap of a director with good experience in WIP exploitation genre…Then perhaps we would have never seen the worst hack deposited upon us of a ‘love affair’ between androgynous, droid denuded, paternal twins so oblivious to sexuality that they could have innocently showered together playing with a rubber ducky none the wiser of interesting differences… We also know he finally and briefly hit puberty during the Jabba Leigh sequence which was an aberrant spark from a heap of wet powder.
Imagine if George completely had his way…He truly is a solution never conceived by Thomas Malthus.
LikeLike
I regularly have girlfriends, as well as female friends in general, refer to me as Sir.
As in, “please sir, may I borrow your lighter.” I usually just withhold whatever is being asked for the first time and say “what’s the magic word?” After they try “please” I ask “please what?” They almost all immediately get it, and thereafter use it unbidden.
It is a powerful subconcious impact on women for them to be accustomed to calling you sir, or a similar designation of authority.
LikeLike
My last lover actually called me Jackal… wanted to call her Kitten but the words escaped me…
LikeLike
I agree with Harry Morgan. I work in a field where most people have doctorates in something, but in my department the qualifying credential is a terminal master’s degree so I’m one of the few with a Ph.D. We’re all on a first name basis at work, but usually girls who I date or who I attract often call me “Dr. ….” I let ’em. If a girl is hot, and assumes she should address me as “Dr. …” I just act with an air of righteous authority and never, ever tell her to call me by my first name. Really gets ’em going.
LikeLike
Yep, this is classic David Deida, The Way of the Superior Man polarity stuff…
Once you lose the polarity, once you move towards neutrality, all the sexuality in the relationship disintegrates.
I’ll have to check this out…
LikeLike
‘The Rules’ is a good book. More aimed for women who want to attract an alpha husband. Not so much for just having fun and finding lovers, but who knows…
LikeLike
lmao@”queef latifah”
LikeLike
I prefer to be called “Sir” as in “Yes Sir”.
LikeLike
what does this mean?
” your left eye looks better?”
LikeLike
“”A beta male’s biggest shortcoming is his fear of offending his woman. Hey betas, newsflash: women WANT you to offend them. Not all the time, of course. But enough times that she is helpfully reminded of the alpha male she wants to believe you are. Sexual tension can be ramped up to incredible heights by edgy, borderline insulting banter.””
Yes. And since I learned this my sex life has been fantastic.
Girl I’m seeing is constantly shit-testing.
When I make it clear that some thing she did is not on…usually in a firm, often borderline insulting way…next thing I know she’s all over me.
She drives within the guardrails. But yah, it took a conscious effort on my part not to cave into the “let’s talk about this” mode.
LikeLike
If a woman is content with being called slutty nicknames, then I honestly need to question her sense of self and dignity. Then again, seeing how so many women here give it up in everyday life that they would probably take no issue with it. Sad.
LikeLike
Before I got completely betafied, I called one of my girlfriends “boobies” or “titties” or something more derogatory.
She said she didn’t like it, but it never affected her willingness to perform for me
LikeLike
After the first month, the more she shit-tests you the more she suspects you are a beta. At that point you better start doing some shit-testing of your own, like cheating or coming damn close to it. If she’s still testing frequently after a few months, time to dump the ho.
LikeLike
OT:
‘Name this person’s occupation’ contest. What does this creature do for a living? [actress obviously…talking about the persona presented]
http://www.airbnb.com/info/how_it_works
LikeLike
gorbachev
che, women come out and say this sort of stuff all the time. mostly i’ve heard it in conversations – you can tell a *lot* from the one-off complaints that women toss out in casual conversations, especially when those complaints are petty like tom – but i’ve also seen it in american mass media.
check out just about any interview with a model in one of the magazines aimed at the “urban” audience – king, smoothgirl, etc. you know, the little q&a sessions that they do, where they plaster a quote on top of each one of the girl’s poses. in almost every single one of the interviews – so we’re talking, like, ten different girls in an issue – the woman drops exactly this sort of wisdom.
i was flipping through a copy of smoothgirl earlier today, and in one, single, one-page interview, the girl dropped hints about:
* the man leading (what’s your favorite sex position? “i like when the man leads the way in the bedroom – whatever position he puts me in is my favorite”)
* having occasional arguments (“my favorite sex is make-up sex. when we fight i get primed for a hard, rough fucking afterward”)
* the right sort of pet names to give a girl (“my man nicknamed me ‘foreva’ because he’s always waiting forever for me to get ready”)
* contrast game (“i like a loving savage. why pick one when you can have both?”)
… so at least the right sort of message about game is being delivered somewhere in the mainstream media.
LikeLike
also gorb
che, wait, so is this meant to indicate that there are guys who *don’t* do this sort of teasing? i literally can’t imagine what that would be like, how the hell would your interactions proceed for more than 14 seconds?
… really not that different from trying to imagine a group of guys getting together and trying to go 14 seconds without taking good-natured backslapping potshots at each other. i’m not seeing it.
i mean, even the dyed-in-the-wool betas i know still drop comments like these with their women on occasion.
the fact that you can still remember such pedestrian ribbing from three months ago indicates that you still don’t *naturally* feel this way about your woman, which is dangerous. i mean, ‘jueput’ man, you two have been in a relationship long enough by now that this shit should flow naturally.
i can understand the “she’s so hot, i’m still a bit tongue tied” kinda thing, for, oh, about four minutes? but if you still have to *try* to do this sort of stuff after this long, that’s not a good sign for the future
LikeLike
Roissy,
A new maxim perhaps?
“We hold these truth to be self-evident: the hotter the chick, the sluttier the nickname. “
LikeLike
All right, which one of you is Josh?
http://failbook.failblog.org/2011/03/21/funny-facebook-fails-joshs-main-concern/
LikeLike
left eye = golden
LikeLike
No better nickname for women than simply ‘woman’. The sheer range you have with tone and context is endless, and nothing makes them feel more like a woman than constantly labeling her as such.
LikeLike
My personal favorite:
cum dumpster
LikeLike
Makes sense. Things worked out well for me whenever I stopped being a pussy and would be more of a dick.
Question. I got an android phone. I’d like it to randomly go off at moments in order to simulate texts and such. Usually I would just subscribe to this place and have your posts make my phone go off, but I’d like it to be more controlled from my perspective. Any suggestions?
LikeLike
She can call me “The Energizer Bunny”… most of ’em seem to arrive at that one on their own. 🙂
LikeLike
I like to call my woman Bitch, Dirt, Baby Garden, all part of my baby making game.
I liked the Sir suggestion, sounds like a fit for public use, more subtle than Master…
LikeLike
Roissy
You’re the epitome of mystery, unpredictability, and, dare I lavish you, dread. Especially when you blog about it in daring, tingle-inducing tones
Kerplunk
LikeLike
“No man wants to hear the toilet water kerplunk when his beloved’s stool escapes her anus.”
Now that’s verve.
LikeLike
I love the commenters on the linked article – they’re all saying the authors are idiots.
LikeLike
I prefer to withhold the nuclear negs if needed, but in the meantime I’ll have fun calling her “Ethel”
LikeLike
Things are right side up when your woman just smiles when her Doctor asks her about those strange bruised places on her tits and ankles.
LikeLike
“If Roissy doesn’t put out a book soon others will continue to capitalize on his ideas. You write well and your voice is unique. Strike while the iron is hot!”
Yup. Leave out the political bullshit. Straight fucking advice. You can call it “The story of oh-face”
LikeLike
If you’re married and have kids, for the love of all things sacred DO NOT call each other “Mother” and “Father” or “Mom” & “Dad” or anything that implies your spouse is in a parental relationship with you. Maybe some men like to be called Big Daddy in bed – that’s getting a little creepy for me too – but this practice should never be allowed to get started. My husband, when I started to get frustrated during a discussion, tried to settle me down by starting his next reply with “Now, Mother….”
WRONG!!
I am not his mother. He doesn’t fuck his mother, and I told him so. He hasn’t done it since.
LikeLike
The Elephant in the Room:
FAT CHICKS
I’m not saying that none of these women coming over to the Chateau point of view have not since I have not read all of them, but the ones that I have looked at do not address female obesity. Women really do not want to confront that they need to get their weight down, and to do that they need to learn how to cook low-carb nutritious meals. Maybe obesity doesn’t revolt them they it does us, but if they want to know why guys aren’t interested, a scale would be a good place to start.
LikeLike
Speaking of useful advice from a woman:
http://www.insideedition.com/news/5967/marriage-counselor-admits-her-own-marriage-was-broken.aspx
LikeLike
I see nothing wrong with stealing ideas from this blog, its better than seeing BS relationship advise everywhere.
LikeLike
http://www.wiserep.com/productDetails.php?id=5769
So, this double shitter is a bad idea, right?
LikeLike
More great advice. Thanks.
My favorite nickname for my woman is “mi colita.”
That’s Spanish for “my little piece of ass.”
Works like a charm. She LOVES it.
LikeLike
If I ever get married, I would prefer the word “slut” or other demeaning names NOT to be my petname…not even in bed.
LikeLike
Women are political animals. They can’t afford to broadcast wide insults, lest such actions have personal political backlash.
You’ll never hear a women publicly besmirching a group. They will gladly do so in private. Backstabbing is a private affair, and diplomacy requires pretty lies.
LikeLike
Amazing how many posters claim to agree that cutesy nicknames are out — unless it’s a cutesy nickname their GF has bestowed on them.
One of the few bits of useful advice I ever got from my dad was to always call all women “baby” or “darling.” 1) If it slipped out in public you wouldn’t look like a dumbass or henpecked loser. 2) During sex you’re not at risk for calling her by another girl’s name.
LikeLike
Women really do not want to confront that they need to get their weight down,
also, they are fed relationship advice like ‘your man should love you for who you are no matter what, and be supportive of you’.
yeah, right.
LikeLike
Speaking of keeping the weight down, listen up guys:
She can crush your balls requiring you to get an operation to fix them if you try to go at it roughly when she’s been eating too much.
LikeLike
Shutterbug on March 22, 2011 at 6:56 am
“I am not his mother. He doesn’t fuck his mother”
How do you know that.
LikeLike
Chateau readership,
Do you abide by a ratio of hard fucking/soft fucking? My current ratio is about 4/1 with my LTGF (long term g-f)
LikeLike
actually there is useful relationship advice to be found everywhere.
case in point: flip through an issue of cosmo and a find a relationship advice article.
read it. understand it. remember it. because it tells you what women want in a man, and what you, the man, need to do to get and keep a woman.
do the opposite.
LikeLike
renee,
If I ever get married, I would prefer the word “slut” or other demeaning names NOT to be my petname…not even in bed.
the guy who marries you, would not even think about calling you that, ever. we can pretty much guarantee it.
LikeLike
@ritmo rioplatense,
They were just examples.
It’s useful to remember little things from time to time. They remind you how easy it is to slip.
LikeLike
Two books of advice-by-females-for-females that impressed me before I found this site and on re-reading hold up well under the harsh lights of the Roissy dungeon are “The Proper Care and Feeding of Husbands” and “Ten Stupid Things Women Do…”, both by Laura Schlessinger. I don’t remember if it was her or a similar author that I heard on a radio talk show who responded to a whiny married female caller with “Shut up and fuck him!” Good advice, that.
LikeLike
@itsme
renee,
If I ever get married, I would prefer the word “slut” or other demeaning names NOT to be my petname…not even in bed.
the guy who marries you, would not even think about calling you that, ever. we can pretty much guarantee it.
+1
LikeLike
The Rules – a pretty good book for women. It tells women how to behave nonchalantly and be (selectively) submissive, therefore passively getting men to behave in the way women want them to, all the while allowing men to think they’re initiating every move.
I think The Rules is older than The Game and The Game was written as its antagonist.
Short term relationships with alphas are all about manipulation and stamina. It’s a battle of intelligence, attraction, sexual tension and willpower. Girls, you have to be sexy, sassy and assertive. Flirt on your own terms, reject booty calls at a moment’s notice, tease him but don’t be too dirty. With regards to nicknames, calling him ‘Sir’ is good, don’t let him come up with a nickname for you, say ‘I want you to call me….’ in low dolcet tones and he’ll melt like butter.
LikeLike
@Rachel
You are on crack. Please get yourself into counseling NOW.
LikeLike
I didn’t know so many people actually like The Rules.
LikeLike
Girls, you have to be sexy, sassy and assertive.
don’t forget the most important one of all:
girls, DO NOT GET FAT.
LikeLike
I like the general principles of The Rules and adapt them myself. The book is a bit prudish, you only live once… A woman should have her own interests and pursuits to add value to her life, she should never bend over backwards for a man and she should never let a man’s agenda be more important than her own.
For a Rules girl, alphas only make good FBs unless you meet one that’s really into you and is in a state of mind to commit. This is very rare and a Rules girl should only expect sex from an alpha and nothing more.
LikeLike
don’t let him come up with a nickname for you, say ‘I want you to call me….’ in low dolcet tones and the beta will melt like butter.
fixed that for you.
reminds me of this light skinned black girl i dated…
me: step lively milk chocolate, train’s here
her: quit calling me that
me: i thought about ‘dark chocolate’, but felt that the lightness of your skin just barely trumped the bitterness of your soul
her: dick! i am a nubian goddess! you can call me that.
me: ok
me (loud enough to be heard on every platform in penn station): STEP LIVELY NUBIAN SKEET SCOOP, TRAIN’S HERE!
her: asshole!
but, face flushed and pupils dilated, step lively she did. and later proved worthy of her name.
LikeLike
@Corporal Hicks, I think my original comment was honest and fair. Don’t neg me because you’re intimidated by what I said… You’re not particularly complicated for me to suss out.
LikeLike
CRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACk………..
Put the pipe down, dearie….
LikeLiked by 1 person
@itsme – tbh, it doesn’t really matter what he wants to call me providing the sex is great and I’m not late for work the next day.
LikeLike
How’s poo, poo! hahah!!! I can’t help it. When I am soooooo into someone, I automatically call them some googoo gaga name!! lol!! I CAN’t help it….it slips out and I get alll soooo in loooove. hehe! The name changes day to day. It’s like my love bug’s got me. hehe!! I get alll touchy, snuggly…. My guy just laughs!!! lol!!! soooooo sweet….puppy. woooo……
oh, btw, I don’t usually follow rules. I tend to make up my own. ha!
LikeLike
The value of being American = the only journalists not killed by Qaddafi’s forces last week were American and they overheard, in Arabic, that it was because they were American:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1368660/Libya-US-female-war-photographer-sexually-assaulted-pro-Gaddafi-forces.html
A female reporter, a 5?, was felt up (but not undressed) by pro-Qaddafi captors after she’d been photographing rebels in action from up close (great posed shots with RPGs) and now we’re supposed to be furious about it and step up the war because of it?
I don’t know about most here, but I’m bored of this new war already.
Except, if the pro-Qaddafi fighters really did kill all the non-American reporters and drivers last week (before the intervention), I’m feeling less sorry for the Qaddafi family.
LikeLike
@what – hahaha!
LikeLike
That female NYT reporter is only alive (and was not raped) because the nation she is a citizen of carries a big stick and represented a massive threat to those who would have raped and killed her if she were from any non-superpower not part of the British Commonwealth.
She has to know, if she had been an opponent of Ronald Reagan’s 1980s attack on Tripoli + the Iraq War, that if the USA had not established itself as a clear and present danger to those who would have killed its citizens, she would be dead right now after being gang banged. No ifs, ands or butts.
LikeLike
Rachel
“@what – hahaha!”
hee! hee!
LikeLike
@Simple Man
I pretty much agree with Sailor and Cowboy, those I use frequently and seem to be a good alternative to demonstrating affection without being simply ridiculous
———–
I really don’t know what goes through people’s heads when they do the “schmoopy routine.” I believe petnames are a total attraction killer, however I think the slutty nicknames are a bit too much.
Maybe it’s because I was raised outside the States and I find most women’s behaviours here simply alarming.
I enjoy when my boyfriend acts in a dominant way, and I believe I am naturally submissive, but when he tried to go with the whorish nicknames, it was a total mood killer.
I understand the whole objectification and de-pedestalization that comes with giving a woman an slutty nickname (similar to the Story of O), but at the same time, it might be too much for naturally submissive and sweet natured women.
Save the slutty nicknames for the sluts, use petnames in an ironic/sarcastic way, it’s usually quite funny if you know how to deliver, but never, never get your schmoopy on.
LikeLike
Most girls call me Dad or Daddy. A while back in Indonesia it was common for a girl to call you Boss, as it was common for Indonesians of both sexes to call western men Boss. One girl I see calls me Doc.
In the most problematic relationship I have now, the girl calls me Honey. I call her Babe. She is a tom boy hottie that is near impossible to properly tame, and so has been relegated to the sidelines. She’s tamed enough to visit on demand and not complain about the other girl, but not tamed to the point of being properly domesticated and an excellent doe eyed servant. Merely doe eyed. The pet names do reflect the lack of master slave relationship.
In my best relationship I called her bitch, and she called me Daddy.
My current best, I call her Babe, or Woman. Unless we’re fucking, then she’s Daddy’s Little Bitch – he he.
And yes, use Woman a lot. You can just up and out of the blue yell WOMAN! to spice up any dead air in your place.
LikeLike
‘Babes’ is wrong, it just sounds like you’ve forgotten the girl’s name because you screw so many women.
‘Daddy’ is wrong, I call my father ‘Daddy’, not about to call anyone else that.
Generally, I say, stick to real names and vary tone of voice. Definitely the most sexy.
LikeLike
Guavaberry
This is unfortunately true.
However…
I chose a simple nickname for a girl some years ago, based on a shortened version of an anime character she had chosen for her screen name. She at first told me she didn’t like it.
I told her I didn’t care. That was her name now.
Several months later she told me she liked her name. And it was her name by then. I named her, and referred to her with that name when talking to other people. It was not just a nickname, it was a re-naming. A re-branding.
She loved it. She more than loved it – she loved her re-branding – adored her new name.
A name that at first she rather hated.
But ya, I can’t use the nickname of bitch with all girls. It’s unfortunate, as that pet name is the most intimate of all.
LikeLike
Guavaberry
This is unfortunately true.
However…
I chose a simple nickname for a girl some years ago, based on a shortened version of an anime character she had chosen for her screen name. She at first told me she didn’t like it.
I told her I didn’t care. That was her name now.
Several months later she told me she liked her name. And it was her name by then. I named her, and referred to her with that name when talking to other people. It was not just a nickname, it was a re-naming. A re-branding.
She loved it. She more than loved it – she loved her re-branding – adored her new name.
A name that at first she rather hated.
But ya, about slutty names, they won’t fit onto all girls easily. I can’t use the nickname of bitch with all girls. It’s unfortunate, as that pet name is the most intimate of all.
LikeLike
Rachel, you are just a troll. I’m guessing in real life you are a man just trying to get attention.
LikeLike
If done properly, you can tell a girl “I’m really into you and you are my cherished property”. All you have to do is use code.
My preferred code words are:
“You’re a little bitch”.
Once trained up to associate those words with affection (through rough sex, casual banter, and what have you), you can use those code words in an sms message and brighter up her whole mood. It says so much.
“You’re a little bitch”.
LikeLike
@xsplat – save the insecurity from your deep-rooted mummy boy issues for your therapy session. Don’t lash out without evidence. Either make your own arguments against my comments, or save your little immature, boyish whimpers for elsewhere. You’ll be disappointed to know, that in real life, I could eat you for breakfast 😉
LikeLike
Like I said Rachel – troll. Every comment you make is designed to be 180% to what you are well aware are the working assumptions on this blog.
Pro “The rules”, constantly acusing guys of being insecure. You’re just trolling for attention. Why do you post here? Are you trying to learn how to seduce women?
Nobody gives a shit about your stupid opinions. Go waste space somewhere else.
LikeLike
Well, xsplat, clearly you DO give a shit about my opinions because you’re commenting on them?
I’m just giving my opnions on Roissy’s post. It’s what you Americans call ‘the First Amendment’ right?
LikeLike
Reading here was enough to make me lose the 8 lbs I had put on post school. And I no longer say weight shouldn’t matter, etc., to friends and try to gentle encourage ’em to stay fit.
LikeLike
The article may have been interesting, but this is bullshit:
…and suddenly your husband or wife is no longer that hot, sensual creature you once lusted after.
There are tons of couples out there that never had mutual lust at the beginning, middle, or end of the relationship.
Also, a lot of girls will nod their head at this advice, and then never follow it. “Room-mating” their boyfriend is simply one more shit-test.
Or, to think of it another way, if a girl has a choice between being alone or keeping her boyfriend around, what do you think she will choose?
If she has girlfriends around, fine, she may let him go without a fight. But, in general, girls hate spending 5 minutes alone.
LikeLike
Rachel, you are just hear to be a pain in the ass. You aren’t hear to try to learn anything. It’s clear you only want to express you stupid useless opinions.
I’m responding to you to tell you that your troll schtick is transparent. And yes, it’s a bothersome waste of space. You serve no purpose here, other than to deliberately irritate. You are a gadfly, and you know it.
LikeLike
Oh dear, xsplat, I seem to have irked you.
I expressed my opinions because this is an interesting article about pet names. I’m trying to give a more…balanced opinion from a girl who has something to say after playing the game with men for the past few years. I don’t think you should insult me and tell me to go away simply because I don’t have a penis and don’t agree with what you say. If everyone was in agreement, what would be the point of a discussion? Don’t take it personally, I just expressed my opinions against the name ‘babes’ and ‘daddy’, it wasn’t an attack on you, just my opinions on those two nicknames, having come across them in my dating history.
LikeLike
heh heh
get a room u2 lustbirds
xsplot + rachel = luv
LikeLike
@Some Handle – I would agree, too much lust probably spells disaster for a long term relationship.
The cynic in me thinks that passion and lust are only good for short term lovers.
Finding a spouse is based on a compatible socioeconomic background, IQ and level of attractiveness.
LikeLike
LikeLike
@Rachel,
you’re an idiot. Men with options will find they are lusted after by women, and if those women are hot men will lust after them and any relationship thus started will have passion. So, by having many hot women interested in him, the man is then free to choose a woman with high compatibility. It’s not rocket science, it’s the point of this blog if you understood what it was about before you started spouting nonsense.
I do recommend this course, it worked for me (that is, don’t spend too much time with someone you are not compatible with for LTRs), but if you don’t have lust and passion at first, what the fuck are you doing? Why have a romantic relationship with someone you don’t want to fuck?
Anyway, now I’ve fallen into the all too common trap of this blog, which is that any time a dumb girl comes along we all waste time trying to converse with her as if she knew anything or was teachable. I’ve said all I have to say on the subject, Rachel; please have the last word.
LikeLike
I’m just giving my opnions on Roissy’s post. It’s what you Americans call ‘the First Amendment’ right?
no. this is a very common misconception, even amongst americans.
the bill of rights (the first ten amendments to the u.s. constitution) protects the people from the government. the first amendment says that the government shall not infringe upon the people’s rights to freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly and petition.
the government has nothing to do with this, so the first amendment is irrelevant here. you can express your opinions because the proprietor allows you to do so. thus your ability to post is not a right you inherently have here or anywhere on the internet, but a privilege granted to you. he can also, at his discretion and without warning, delete or modify your posts if he so chooses. others here are free to ignore/agree/blast your opinions.
when i mean ‘you’, i don’t mean just you in particular, but any of us commenters.
LikeLike
Remember I mentioned last year (and got into some flame wars over) that I would occasionally ask normal women in night clubs to do lap-dances for chump change (after I’d asked them to do it for free and didn’t get an immediate yes)?
Well, apparently plenty of 20 something American guys have been doing the same thing (or took my advice) and now a young woman in Oregon has gotten the White Knighter Republicans in that state to try to criminalize this behavior:
http://www.boston.com/news/education/k_12/articles/2011/03/21/ore_nudists_fear_being_covered_by_strip_club_laws/
She says her friends are saying yes to the guys but she’s probably been raised a “Christian” and wants to put a stop to it (example of a non-slut wanting to regulate everyone else).
Technically, the Oregonian White Knighters are only going after official strip clubs and have not yet pushed to make it a felony for a man to ask a woman to strip for cash.
Apparently, these asshole Republicans think that, by outlawing strip clubs, men won’t ask normal, non-professional, women to strip anymore.
They think the strip clubs set a bad example for us, meaning that we’d treat women (pedastilized by the GOP) with disrespect more as a result of the strip clubs’ existence.
This development in Oregon is precisely the reason why I made the point on this blog in 2010 that PUAs would be going in entirely the wrong direction by helping the White Knighters to stigmatize the concept of paying for sexual activity now and then.
I think it was because, while top of the line college students do lap-dances at the clubs on the US west coast, the US east coast seems to get only lower class women to work in strip clubs and they don’t even touch the guys (it’s really beta to just watch and not get off).
So leaders and students in the PUA movement on the US east coast and in London, England didn’t know that 9s and 10s at major universities will strip for chump change (or didn’t want their seminar clients to know this because it would divert money away from their services).
Obviously 20 something men in Oregon understand this. Their right to ask women is now under attack, and from the “right” (neocon, socon).
I don’t know why the Republicans want to work hard to reverse their momentum toward the 2012 elections. They stopped trying to legislate against men for the 2010 elections. Now they’re back to their old anti-male tactics.
LikeLike
Don’t ever let a woman room-mate you. You will lose interest in her before she does you. Both are bad.
LikeLike
…too much lust probably spells disaster for a long term relationship
Not “too much”. None.
Think of how many guys you know who are dating some chick with a belly. She may not be obese, she doesnt need to be.
How much do you think he really lusts for her? Did he ever? Or was he simply lonely and horny?
LikeLike
@Rachel,
Simply put; it’s not what women like that counts.
It’s what women respond to. As in, what makes the ‘gina tingle.
I’m not interested in being nice unless it tingles the ‘gina.
Anything else leads to LJBF zone, and I spent more than enough time there in my life to consider it worth practically anything to stay in Lover zone.
What you think you want and what you actually want/respond strongly to, being female, have nothing to do with each other.
LikeLike
“Chateau-recommended nicknames are sexual, and somewhat degrading, in nature.”
Fringe S1E01: my woman moves exactly like the female character in the opening sequence when she’s naked. 10 minutes in, you see a lab full of shaved animals, including a ferret. http://bit.ly/eJU2oc Hence her pet name: “My naked ferret.”
LikeLike
Thanks for that delectable correction on general ignorance. I am now a more well-rounded European 🙂
LikeLike
@Gorb – frankly I don’t care what a man calls me, if I want to sleep with him then I’ve already made that decision. LJBF could mean good fuck buddies, I prefer that. Potential husbands are tricky to come across and something I’m patiently keeping an eye out for, but in the mean time, a woman has needs, y’know. Alphas make good FBs in the interim.
LikeLike
@Rachel
I haven’t been following the discussion above but I can say that, if a woman will sleep quickly with non marriage material guys but will play the virgin or play by “The Rules” with marriage material, then the latter male would be a chump for falling for this. Lots of comments on this blog serve the purpose of warning guys not to fall for the “Rules Girls” behavior (which is designed to get the man to put the woman on a pedestal).
LikeLike
Rachel – before commenting here, you’d do yourself and others here a favor and read the archives.
You’ll find that no one gives a shit what you say you want in a man.
We don’t care.
Got it?
For the answer to why we don’t care what you say you want, re-read what Gorb wrote.
You can not educate us on what women want by explaining to us what you want. What you say you want has NOTHING to do with men learning how to get whatever they want from women – be it intimacy or sex or whatever.
Got it? It’s a simple concept. I doubt you can get it though – as females tend to be solipsistic.
LikeLike
Great piece Roissy!
LikeLike
Who was it that said that “taking dating advice from a woman is like asking a food critic how to cook a meal” ?
LikeLike
Erm, @xsplat, like I said, for a man who keeps saying you don’t care, you seem to care A LOT about pointing out the fact you don’t care… What would Freud say?
Actually, I was addressing Gorb re: the benefits of turning LJBF into friends with benefits. I’m interested to hear what he thinks of that arrangement.
So, can you can stop stressing and chill out? There’s no need to take this so seriously and be so highly strung about what I say, why DO you care so much?!
LikeLike
@dragnet – keep comments short, there may be a word limit for moderation.
LikeLike
@Rachel c/o xsplat:
I think the reason why the women in the OP get it right is because they are using objective evidence for what works and what doesn’t.
When female advice goes to shit is when it is subjective, because their emotions get involved, it’s illogical, and usually revolves around finding a “nice, handsome, guy,” which we all know is completely opposite to what a woman responds to.
LikeLike
Women have worse problems than being too subjective. They dissimulate to themselves; they actively avoid confrontation with self knowledge.
I’ll listen to a woman about picking up and manipulating women if that’s what she does and is good at.
It is of no interest – in fact it is dissimulation – to hear what she says she personally responds to. That’s noise here – not signal.
What’s far worse than just a little noise is when it is so obviously trolling. Perhaps Rachel believes she’s genuinely trying to give a more balanced view. If so, all the more reason to revile her ignorance.
LikeLike
Rachel, I’m betting you have the same fucked-up, Meth Mouth-lookin’ grill as every other Brit broad.
Not to mention the bangers-and-mash butt.
LikeLike
Oh xsplat, you should really let it go. I’m not responsible for the way you feel towards me. That’s your own countertransferance talking.
LikeLike
The I know you are but what am I argument?
Rachel – why are you here? I’ve asked several times.
LikeLike
Rachel
¡qué ‘jueputa! women have names?
LikeLike
This thing called “Rachel” is clearly no more than an attention-seeking device. It has had nothing to say about any subject here beyond “I disagree. What are your thoughts?” There is no evidence so far that it has any sort of comprehension or even a biological basis for its function. It is a Bot, in other words.
And Bots get no Love.
LikeLike
… ok, gotcha. that’s reassuring. btw, your posts are solid signal in what’s often a sea of noise
although, what do you mean by ‘slip’, i’m curious — do you mean starting to indulge too many of her whims above yours?
i’m sure you don’t mean *stopping* the teasing, etc; i’ll refer to my previous comment, about how i have extreme difficulty imagining an interaction with a woman that would last more than a few seconds without such things.
LikeLike
last was @ gorbachev
LikeLike
Two things drive women wild: singers/musicians and double entendres:
LikeLike
I’ve noticed a trend lately of books and articles written by women that are plagiarizing borrowing from the themes espoused daily on this blog. Smart women — realistic women, and probably women who have been burned by stupidly banal relationship advice one too many times — are coming around to the everlasting fountain of wisdom and truth that is the Chateau.
That Kay Hymowitz woman from the Wall Street Journal linked to your Blog in a Daily Beast article:
Check out the websites like names like MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way), Nomarriage.com, or EternalBachelor.com (“Give Modern Women the Husband They Deserve. None.”). Or read popular bloggers like the pseudonymous Roissy, a ferociously caustic dissector of female “sluttiness” and “shit tests” (attempts to manipulate men). There are dozens upon dozens of gurus and counselors who publish posts like “42 Things Wrong With American Women” while chat forums ruminate over how “American Women Suck.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-02-28/why-are-men-angry-manning-up-author-kay-hymowitz-explains/%20
But she still doesn’t seem to have come around to your way of thinking in any real way.
LikeLike
You’ll be disappointed to know, that in real life, I could eat you for breakfast
I like your left fupa better
LikeLike
in real life, I could eat you for breakfast
really need to watch those calories
LikeLike
I made my last girl call me cockzilla. Funny part she was Asian.
LikeLike
Xsplat, I thought this blogpost was interesting because it talks about womens’ books and nicknames in the bedroom. So that’s why I mentioned ‘The Rules’ and why I made comments about nicknames for women. I don’t think nicknames should make the woman feel too submissive because it’s in your interests to unleash the inner minx in her. That’s why I suggested just repeating her name in bed as it’s more empowering and she’s more likely to want to climb on top of you.
As for my other comments, they were only addressed to a few selected gents. I have not said anything that’s out of context, so why are you so possessive of this thread?
LikeLike
Mr Driveallnight, sorry, nil points for you. I’m not a Brit, I’m not even white.
Clearly, you were trying to demonstrate the sophistication and intellectual wit of an American, non?
LikeLike
KUATO IS MY WINGMAN.
LikeLike
“in real life, I could eat you for breakfast”
Sure you could, punkin.
Yet another Internet assassin. After this blog, now it’s even funnier when I spot a Western broad trying to project masculinity.
Grrrrrr….Rambo Kitty!!
LikeLike
Yeah? I notice you didn’t bother to correct me about your fat ass, though.
LikeLike
@Rachel
LMAO. Do you really believe that taken at a whole the following is good advice??
1. Be a “Creature” Unlike Any Other
2. Don’t Talk to a Man First (and Don’t Ask Him to Dance)
3. Don’t Stare at Men or Talk Too Much
4. Don’t Meet Him Halfway or Go Dutch on a Date
5. Don’t Call Him & Rarely Return His Calls
6. Always End Phone Calls and dates First
7. Don’t Accept a Saturday Night Date after Wednesday.
8. Fill Up Your Time before the Date
9. How to Act on Dates 1,2, and 3
10. How to Act on Dates 4 through Commitment Time
11. ALWAYS end the date first
12. Stop Dating Him if He Doesn’t Buy You a Romantic Gift for Your Birthday or Valentine’s Day
13. Don’t See Him More than Once or Twice a Week
14. No More than Casual Kissing on the First Date
15. Don’t Rush into Sex, Wait at Least Three Dates
16. Don’t Tell Him What to Do
17. Let Him Take the Lead
18. Don’t Expect a Man to Change or Try to Change Him
19. Don’t Open Up Too Fast
20. Be Honest but Mysterious
21. Accentuate the Positive & Other Rules for Personal Ads
22. Don’t Live with a Man (or Leave Your Things in His Apartment)
23. Don’t Date a Married Man
24. Slowly Involve Him in Your Family & Other Rules for Women with Children
25. Practice, Practice, Practice! (or, Getting Good at The Rules)
26. Even if You’re Engaged or Married, You Still Need The Rules
27. Do The Rules, Even when Your Friends & Parents Think It’s Nuts
28. Be Smart and Other Rules for Dating in High School
29. Take Care of Yourself and Other Rules for Dating in College
30. NEXT! & Other Rules for Dealing with Rejection
31. Don’t Discuss The Rules with Your Therapist.
32. Don’t Break The Rules!
33. Do The Rules and You’ll Live Happily Ever After!
34. Love Only Those Who Love You
35. Be Easy to Live With
[Editor: The Rules is great advice for women who want to snag clingy betas, because alphas will see right through this crap and run for the hills. What women don’t understand is that the game that works on them doesn’t work on men. Or, to be generous, it doesn’t work to the same degree on men.]
LikeLike
Rachel,
Intelligent women would not disagree with Chateau concepts to the extent you did in your original post. You may or may not be fat/ugly but you surely are not smart.
LikeLike
Yea rachel – all this “release the inner minx” projection bullsh*t of yours. Why are you still posting. You are of no interest to anyone. And yes, i agree with the other posters, i bet you are plain at best (a 3-4).
Also, you macho posing and masculine edge to the way that you write, coupled with your admission suggests that you are more than likely black. Which makes your opinion even less relevant here
LikeLike
(No one likes black women particularly, not even black men – google the research on online dating reponses if you don’t believe me)
LikeLike
Gorbachev:
“In bed, pre-sleep some time last month:
“You told me you loved me.”
“I meant I love your ass.”
“You only want my ass.”
“I appreciate a fine ass. I like to sample generously.”
Best line ever, though I admit I stole it (see if you know the reference):
“I love you.”
(casual, dismissive tone): “I know” (walk away)
One of her friends told her I seemed like a but of a jerk sometimes.
She went on for 15 minutes about how sweet and generous and charming and wonderful I was.”
I’ve had varying reactions with certain chicks when delivering the same material. In general, I get good reactions, don’t get me wrong. But occasionally I find lines almost exactly like this unexpectedly backfire. I think it goes back to calibration. Depending on the chick, one may have to dial it back a little bit.
LikeLike
Anon:
“Who was it that said that “taking dating advice from a woman is like asking a food critic how to cook a meal” ?”
A better simile would be that it’s like asking random football fans to give advice to the head coach.
LikeLike
Mukluk said: “Best line ever, though I admit I stole it (see if you know the reference):
‘I love you.’
(casual, dismissive tone): ‘I know’ (walk away)”
Han Solo, about to encased in Carbonite in Empire Strikes Back.
LikeLike
One question for the PUA’s.
We all think that women, if they constantly reject betas when they are younger, can wind up with kids and cats and nothing else. Or, marry the nice guy CEO and live long and well and prosper.
I notice that Jesse James new girl has tattoos all over, and Witherspoon is getting set to marry a classic nice guy. (It pays to read People Magazine in your Doctor’s office. Gives you something to talk about with the women.)
What about the PUA’s? Do we have good, long term outcome studies on guys who constantly reject LTR’s with “nice girls”?
Do [aging] PUA’s ever tired of gaming women? After all, women are essentially boring. Are they really worth all that effort? And, your hormones tend to tail off as you age, and women are just plain unattractive on low hormone days. Alcohol really comes into its own in this situation. Believe me.
Being a good PUA reminds me a lot of the quip by Tom Landry when asked what it takes to be a winning football coach.
“It takes a special type of men to be a good football coach. You have to be smart enough to understand the game but dump enough to think it’s important.”
Of course, this holds true in many areas of activity, from accounting to particle physics.
LikeLike
@chi-town: “Speaking of “I know”, think how much we can know about George given its back ground.”
I’m glad someone else recognizes the significance of that. God, Lucas is pathetic. The first two Star Wars movies are okay in spite of him, but he did everything in his power to ruin the rest of them.
Every character from the first three movies is in the prequels. Every character except the most important one, Han Solo. That’s how monumentally retarded Lucas is. He tried to sell us this love story between anikan and padme. But did anyone believe it? Nope. Lucas’ characters are beta males and boring women and nobody cares what happens to them.
Star Wars is a cultural phenomenon in spite of Lucas, not because of him.
LikeLike
@Gramps: “Do [aging] PUA’s ever tired of gaming women?”
I think what they do is, when they’re younger than 30 they date 22-25 year old women but never have girlfriends for more than six months. Between 30 and 40 they date 22-25 year old women and have long-term relationships lasting at most 3 years. Around 40, they marry a 25 year old woman.
I imagine they get tired of it in the same way that bill gates gets tired of all those zeros at the end of his bank statement.
LikeLike
“I don’t think nicknames should make the woman feel too submissive because it’s in your interests to unleash the inner minx in her. That’s why I suggested just repeating her name in bed as it’s more empowering and she’s more likely to want to climb on top of you.”
Here we go again about what is in the interests of men and what men are supposed to desire…Geeky beta men who play tomb raider dream about the inner minx to bridge the yawning gap from the lack of their own resources. No, it is in the interest of most men to enjoy the pleasure to have it within themselves to take willing women for themselves who are completely submissive to such advances.
In the manner of totalitarian societies that have massive horizon swallowing images of our benevolent leader do the certain pervasive falsehoods infest the daily lives of men. It is here that we seek aesthetic relief from the beauty objects of bowl haired, flannel clad, ape striding martinets of the feminist orthodoxy. We are here for rake-hell over Rachel.
Answer: Female submission in the context of this blog is a sexual act. Its enticing and is surely linked to sexual opportunity. It means a woman is ready for sex. It is best answered by the rhetorical question: Why the fuck doesn’t a doe have antlers?
LikeLike
Rachel, the value of non-White women is quite low on the sexual market. Lower than that of fat and ugly White women.
I can’t think of a more omega move than banging some dusky wog.
LikeLike
There’s almost too much stupid about this to even begin to parse, but I guess I have to start somewhere:
What’s wrong with fat women? I ask seriously.
LikeLike
@Nom Chompsky
Took a look at one for your answer.
LikeLike
What is wrong with fat women? Absolutely nothing when the two of you are trying to outrun a hungry bear. A plate of fatty meatballs buys a lot of time.
The only place we see that kind of blubber in nature is in the sea where creatures are essentially weightless. Mammalian warm blood seems to benefit from the insulating fat as trade off. So I’d say it has something to do with biological survivability or lack thereof on land.
LikeLike
I told my thoughtlessly liberal girlfriend that I would call her “Sarah Palin” in bed, because SP is so hot.
It worked.
LikeLike
Can I nominate Casey Heynes to be official alpha-in-the-making? Also, I read a great blog post about how America wants to further make it illegal to be an alpha http://bit.ly/hBO7HU It appears that the Obama administration only protects those who are bullied on the basis of gender or race. No luck if you are a white male. Oh, and you go to juvey (and prison if over 15) if you dare be a man and fight back in self-defense.
LikeLike
@Dan
So everybody should meet your personal standards of attractiveness? I understand not being attracted to somebody, for whatever reason, but to equate this with somehow being worthwhile as a person is the reason why people hate blogs like this.
I know, it’s more fun to pretend that it’s simply because you’re the fearless arbiter of truth in a world of pretty little lies, but it’s really because you’re entitled assholes.
LikeLike
“but it’s really because you’re entitled assholes.”
That’s accurate.
So now you have your answer. We are entitled assholes, who prefer youth and beauty, and who work to attain it.
LikeLike
from the comments section at worldstar on the video about a guy complaining about the women in NYC.
“YOU JUST GOTTA NOT GIVE A f*** AND LET PASS b****ES PASS AND DROP MAD GAME ON ALL b****ES UNTIL ONE FALL. THEN TWO THEN THREE THEN YOU GOTA STABLE AND YOU MORE THEN ABLE TO CRACK A SUPER FLY b**** TELL HER YOU SOMETHING YOU AINT DIG IN HER CHEEKS AND LEAVE HER AT THE BANK! AFTER BORROWING A COUPLE OF DOLLARS- THAT KNOWLEDGE IS GONNA COST YOU! OH YEAH IF YOU DRESS LIKE A STREET DUDE THEN IT DOESNT WORK.”
this guy must be skittle mans cousin or friend
LikeLike
Nom Chompsky: ” What’s wrong with fat women? I ask seriously. ”
There’s almost too much stupid to parse.
Nom Chompsky: “I understand not being attracted to somebody, for whatever reason ”
BINGO!!
Nom Chompsky: “but to equate this with somehow being worthwhile as a person is the reason why people hate blogs like this.”
Trying small words here, … this is a blog where men who want to screw ‘fit’ women discuss the same.
FAT FIT.
LikeLike
FAT is not equal to FIT
LikeLike
@Mukluk
“”I’ve had varying reactions with certain chicks when delivering the same material. In general, I get good reactions, don’t get me wrong. But occasionally I find lines almost exactly like this unexpectedly backfire. I think it goes back to calibration. Depending on the chick, one may have to dial it back a little bit.””
Yes…with Chinese girls, sometimes they don’t quite get the irony or the tone.
If they’re being totally serious and say “I love you…”
And you say “I know…”
You come off as over-gaming.
I’ve come to learn with game, context is king.
If you’re already considered alpha, you can act like you want to act and say what you want to say.
When you do things out of neediness…you’re backsliding.
LikeLike
“but to equate this with somehow being worthwhile as a person is the reason why people hate blogs like this.”
You don’t seem to understand the purpose of this blog, if you think it matters to the authors or commenters that people hate blogs like this.
This blog is about something. It has a use and a purpose. Try to step out of your solipsism for a moment and stretch your imagination a bit to envision what that purpose could be.
LikeLike
Response to “I love you”.
Response? If you have the mindset that you need to respond, you’ve already lost man points. It’s not about the right response, the right words, the right posture. You don’t have to respond. You can if you want.
You can run most of your game non-verbally.
“I love you”
Mild upturning of lips, and continuing with whatever you were doing or want to do – which is likely to be sexual if you are interacting with her intimately like that.
There are no required responses. It’s your rules.
At least, once you have learn the rules and are practiced at playing the game by rules and have internalized the rules behind the rules, then there are no rules and all rules are your rules. Same as with any any art or sport or craft. Writing, for instance.
LikeLike
My old lady does not have a nickname for me… but she has one for my cock – it’s “boss”.
And I call her pussy “cherry”.
LikeLike
@APL
“FAT is not equal to FIT”
Beg to differ: one can, in fact, be fat and fit.
However, women cannot be fat and attractive (to 98% of men).
LikeLike
@Nom Chomsky
What’s wrong with fat?
Uh, how ’bout diabetes, infertility, and a gluttonous personality to start?
Fat people are inherently selfish. They are GIVEN OVER to their passions. They lack self-control. They cannot be trusted. They are people who lie very easily.
I learned a long time ago never to trust fat people. They LIE CONSTANTLY to you and to themselves.
Oh yeah. So sexy.
Stupid a**hole.
LikeLike
@xsplat
Please waste no more time with Rachel.
S(he) is a moron. Women should never post here because what they SAY is never what they RESPOND to. Their words are always WORTHLESS.
Yet women feel **compelled** to post here. Why? Easy. It’s the hamster. Women want “in” and anything interesting, and they want to sh*t all over it. They want to make their “nest,” on anything Alpha.
The best way to respond to morons like Rachel is silence. Let the hamster post and then ignore. S(he) will be anxiously waiting for a reply post that will never come because all the guys on here realize that talking to a hamster is a waste of time.
Don’t feed the hamster. Let the hamster starve. What Rachel-moron loves more than anything is a response. Let. the. hamster. starve.
PUH-LEEZ…
LikeLike
Anton: “Beg to differ: one can, in fact, be fat and fit.”
Indeed one can.
Whereabouts I live, ‘Fit’ is a colloquial term used to describe a pretty woman or a woman one finds sexually desirable.
She’s fit, I would!
In my experience these are invariably not fat women.
LikeLike
Why would it occur to you to share that thought here? Just because you had it?
Did something lead you to believe that anyone here cares if you feel bad? Or that anyone here would be persuaded by your opinion of what is real and unreal?
LikeLike
@xsplat
I can also ask? Questions in rapid succession? Even if they don’t form complete sentences?
LikeLike
@Xsplat
Please do not respond to the moron-hamster.
Let. the. hamster. die.
Thank you.
LikeLike
Ya, crossroads, I didn’t think you’d directly answer a simple question.
Rachel, you are a poisonous bore, and I don’t like shit in my corn flakes.
LikeLike
Elizabeth Taylor just died. Quite a piece of ass back in the day.
LikeLike
@ Perrier
You, sir, are a complete moron.
LikeLike
@Malcolm Tucker, you weren’t kidding!
LikeLike
I’ll pitch in here and simply say that the objective of the Chateau is not to satisfy the emotional cravings (real and imagined) of women. It’s not to help women find their soul mates, expand their friend-zone, purge their guilt, feed their cats or figure out why they’re unsatisfied (although it’s possible that by reading the site, they get some idea of why they’re unsatisfied).
It’s to help men and women understand what the contributors here believe to be the mechanisms where men can successfully pick up any women who pass their Boner Test. To that extent, when a large number of the regulars at the Chateau say “fat chicks don’t turn us on”, you have to realize that this cuts RIGHT to the heart of the matter.
Men don’t visit The Chateau in order to understand womankind in order to find their eternal soulmates, (although game doesn’t preclude this happening), it’s to develop strategies to maximize their chances of landing a number of partners – all of which could be ‘The One’ – if they want to find her.
So, if I develop the techniques that allow me to successfully approach and canvass lots of women for sex, I can afford to base the selection on a whole bunch of criteria, the most impostant being whether the chick passes the Boner Test. And for many men, fat women fail the Boner Test, no matter how sparkling their personality is, or how precious their parents think they are.
Rachel, I think the problem is that your understanding of what the Chateau is for is orthogonal to that of the men (and seemingly a few women) who come here.
Game is used as an insight into the reasons women will sleep with guys who seem to treat them ‘badly’. It’s the practical manifestation of a set of techniques (or tricks if you prefer) to ‘fool’ a woman into believing a man is that kind of guy. It yields results for men whether you like it or not for men who choose to deploy it.
Rachel, I have no idea whether you’re a fat chick or not. I don’t know about your ethnicity. And if I met you in a social context, I might try and game you if you passed the Boner Test. But the chances are that (in my case) unless you’re a petite WASP with a really great complexion, I probably wouldn’t bother. I have to say though, that in my case, your argumentative nature might factor positively toward your Boner Factor, because I like a challenge. If you’re not in the first flush of youth, that might not work against you either. I’m not completely in charge of the Little Guy and what makes him happy.
It’s not entirely fair to accuse regulars at The Chateau of being ‘entitled’, because all they’re doing is expressing (rather candidly) what their preferences are in a partner. That’s intrinsic to their application of Game. They’re under no obligation to like Tahitian transvestite strippers, just as you’re not obliged to believe that Game works.
But given that Game is what this blog is all about, I have to wonder why you’re persisting in posting here.
I don’t want to tread on xsplat’s toes here, but it sounds like you’re projecting here – advising him that he’d better not ‘start a jihad’ on comments he doesn’t like. IIRC you were the one talking about ‘Freedom of Speech’ and the ‘First Amendment’ (based admittedly, on a false understanding of the US Constitution).
Look, if this thread really is so irksome, most browsers have the ability for you to delete your page history. It can’t be THAT difficult to resist posting here.
LikeLike
@Nom Chompsky
This blog is about “ugly truths” which is in some part a reaction to the daily lies we hear everyday. What makes you think we have not heard your question a hundred times, and addressed and explained it a hundred times? The obvious questions have been answered. Why do you even bother with this blog? Why don’t you direct your ire at the media and Hollywood who pretends to like fat people but never, ever employs them in the limelight? You prefer the lairs, ;that’s why.
Most men do not prefer fat women. Some men would never bother with them under any circumstances because it would be like having sex with your dad. In other words, it has to do with their worthless sexuality, just like your dad to the likes of us. They may be a nice person, just like your dad.
Though it is worth noting that, in addition to the ridiculous attempt at bonar counseling, we happen to be the fattest nation that has ever been, anytime, anywhere. It alarms some of us especially when it comes with a thick layer of denial and, holy hell, we are even exporting this culture.
Here, truth is considered a most holy precept. Any attempt at softening it for the sake of feelings is going to be nothing but smoke out the hole.
LikeLike
but to equate this with somehow being worthwhile as a person is the reason why people hate blogs like this.
then gtfo.
LikeLike
Sorry xsplat, I just couldn’t resist winding you up. It was a bit mean of me.
RIP Elizabeth Taylor. She was a Hollywood legend and a very vivacious lady.
LikeLike
A guy I knew from way back had nicknamed his then-girlfriend “Eddie” from Eddie Murphy Raw (e.g., “Eddie, I want HALF!”) She was a stripper and a fitness model. He never married her despite significant pressure.
LikeLike
Yep. She had some nice tits all right. And eight marriages.
LikeLike
“I feel bad for any chick who falls for a reader of the Chateau, because they are falling for something that isn’t real.”
The whole basis for this blog is that there’s a disconnect between what society teaches us and the way things actually are. So what or who is “real”?
The people who have the hardest time with dating and relationships are those who are not honest with themselves, in the form of high expectations or low self-esteem, independent of gender.
LikeLike
LIZ TAYLOR DEAD
As if this Board needed more evidence of female hypergamy….
EIGHT marriages???
I ask you.
Serious Princess Kupcake mentality….
Of course, who does she say was the “love of her life?”
The ALPHA Richard Burton, drunkard, rabel-rouser, poet, a man’s man….
This blog validated.
Once again.
LikeLike
@Nom Chompsky
“So everybody should meet your personal standards of attractiveness?”
When did I say this?
“I understand not being attracted to somebody, for whatever reason, but to equate this with somehow being worthwhile as a person”
Again, when did I say fat people aren’t “worthwhile”? Can you define what it means to be “worthwhile as a person”?
Fat chicks are supreme boner killers. They are the female equivalent of the mushy, clingy nice guy. I wont lie, their physical appearance repulses me.
Just as women hate men who are wusses and pansies, I don’t like fat chicks.
“is the reason why people hate blogs like this.”
I judge things based on merit, not on popular opinion.
LikeLike
Rachel
“Sorry xsplat, I just couldn’t resist winding you up. It was a bit mean of me.”
Rachel = Condescending shit test machine, Boys, learn from this and learn to run from it. Probably have a hyphenated last name, doesn’t use salt in her cooking, loves to say, make or do something that is offensive to a man and then when he responds claim he can’t handle it. ATTENTION PLEASE!!!
Lady garden is probably hip to hip, navel to anus hairy, and men should just accept her for who she is.(where’s that peter guy?, if he can handle it. do you like pachouli?)You quote poetry on your facebookposts to make yourself look intelligent as you think that is so attractive to a man.
I bet you post the obvious about a subject that she knows no one dare call her out on due to timing or respect…For example..
“RIP Elizabeth Taylor. She was a Hollywood legend and a very vivacious lady.”
Thanks for that insight, you must be an encyclopedia of knowledge. I am not sure anyone may have thought of her in that way.
Here let me help you my little lady with your next facebook post since the attention here will die down soon.
try this, betas will come running and dropping out of the sky..
I’ll be taking a break from facebook, starting tomorrow!
Then of course answer each male comment claiming no one will let you be, after all thay all want in on that big brain of yours, my shmoopie.
“I would not tell them too much. Women are never to be entirely trusted—not the best of them.” – Sherlock Holmes
LikeLike
rachel, Shut The Fuck Up.
This was a solid post. Excellent job Chateau guys…. (how many are there besides Roissy?)
LikeLike
Social schema! Well Pegasus and Pythagorean!
Listen Sugar Tits, it is true, you remind me of an earth girl I once dated who shit tested me to death.
Of course five years later when she saw my playin’ guitar in the club, she became a kitten. It was the only way for her to join the harem. I did call her a good girl, guess when?
Going to be fifty next month, good god I remember the days of all the girls chasin’ me. Of course that was when I realised how things should be. I could and can still play that pussy machine(stratocaster)like a god of thunder. It still works too, last week I kissed a girl, probably only a 6 but she was 21 years old.
Q:Do you know what it is like to kiss a 21 year old girl as a 49 year old man?
A:The same as when I was a 21 year old man.
“Thank you, Mr. Bailey, I’ll consider that … when this becomes a democracy.” – Kirk
LikeLike
Facebook has the success it does because of The Hamster.
Remember that.
Facebook lets The Hamster run, and that is it’s brilliance.
It’s just like cell phones.
The coming epidemic of brain cancer from cell phones will hit the MILLIONS of American Kupcakes EXTRA hard.
Why you ask?
These PBR’s (personal brain radiation) devices (a/k/a cell phones) are to be found “super-glued” to the ears of “Kupcake” world-wide.
Kupcake’s hamster runs inexhaustibly on the cell, frying what little brain cells they have (left).
Feminism is phasing men out.
But The Hamster will destroy itself soon enough with radiation.
Just watch.
LikeLike
@APL
Thanks for the clarification. Never heard “fit” used that way before. I like it.
LikeLike
I need some advice.
I remember Roissy saying in one of his “Relationship Advice” series posts something along the lines of: “…if you are sick and your girlfriend visits you and brings you hot soup – you are doing it right.”
Now, what’s an alpha way of managing an opposite situation where your GF is sick?
LikeLike
anton,
it’s british english.
LikeLike
@Dan
“When did I say this?”
Claiming that people who don’t meet them are worthy of hate is about as much of a value judgment as you can get.
“Again, when did I say fat people aren’t “worthwhile”? Can you define what it means to be “worthwhile as a person”?”
It means different things in different contexts; if you need a quick and dirty definition, something along the lines of, “able to meaningfully contribute to some shared/personal accomplishment.”
[Editor: Fat chicks can contribute at work where their looks are less relevant to job performance, but they are operating from a distinct disadvantage in the dating market because almost all men find fatness repulsive.]
“Fat chicks are supreme boner killers. They are the female equivalent of the mushy, clingy nice guy. I wont lie, their physical appearance repulses me.
Just as women hate men who are wusses and pansies, I don’t like fat chicks.”
I don’t agree that largely immutable physical features are equivalent with personality traits, and I think that hating somebody for what they look like is just…sad.
[What’s more immutable: Personality traits or body weight? How many people have you seen gain and lose weight? Now… how many people have you witnessed change their personalities wholesale?]
Sure. I was just pointing it out. My point was this blog is often stridently wrong
[Translation: This blog’s truths make me quiver with impotent rage.]
and confuses personal preference for some wellspring of truth and then pats itself on the back for doing so.
[Kind of an idiot, aren’t ya? When my personal perference matches the preferences of millions of men it’s not so personal any more, is it?]
The writing is also distractingly self-indulgent.
[What part of *preen* don’t you understand?
ps you write like a nancyboy.]
LikeLike
Rox
Have your other girlfriend bring her the soup.
LikeLike
@Nom Chompsky
I don’t agree that largely immutable physical features are equivalent with personality traits
On the dating market, they are. A man’s personality traits are, more or less, equivalent to a women’s looks.
Largely immutable? Put down the cupcakes and get on the tread mill.
As far as dating goes, they are worthy of my hate. Just as girls hate weak-willed, spineless men.
LikeLike
It’s a shame men don’t like pet names, I only use them when I love/like him a lot. I will try and say “stud” next time… It’s hard to restrain my baby-talk instincts though when men say and do the cutest things. So you should know it all comes from a place of our love and affection for you.
You are very right about how we like to be teased, it is true. There is a guy at my work who likes to tease me all day about silly things and I can’t help but laugh, it is very attractive.
LikeLike
you write like a nancyboy
he’s probably married to or otherwise stuck with a fattie.
LikeLike
Re: The sexual value of non-white girls.
Can anybody tell me why black guys essentially never are seen, in public at least, with a girl of darker complexion?
I live in an area with a large black population. I last recall seeing a light skinned black guy with a dark skinned black girl about 15 years ago, at an IHOP. It was so anomalous I can still remember what I was eating (Chef’s salad). He was average looking and she was gorgeous, which I guess explains it.
It is not at all uncommon to see a white guy with a dark girl, Asian or black.
So, why is it that black guys don’t go with blacker girls?
LikeLike
gramps,
in black communities that were descended from slave trade (american blacks, west indians, etc.) there is still a stigma of darker = inferior.
i once dated a west indian girl who had sisters whose skin tones varied from quite light to very dark. according to her, the ones with lighter skin always got preferential treatment.
LikeLike
Pulling back to the subject of useful words from a woman, can’t pass up the opportunity to recommend the novel “This Is How” by M.J. Hyland. It’s about an alpha and high-omega (in Vox Day’s taxonomy) living under the same roof, their interactions with women and with each other. The minimalist, dialogue-heavy narration is first-person from the omega’s POV, and Hyland nails the seething resentment and pathetic game common to that type. If you enjoy reading game vignettes on sites like this, you won’t be able to put this book down.
LikeLike
[…] Found! Useful Relationship Advice From A Woman, Chicks Dig Cheesy Pickup […]
LikeLike
[…] – “Found! Useful Relationship Advice from a Woman“, “Chicks Dig Jerks: Science Edition“, “Dating a Vegetarian Girl is a […]
LikeLike
The petname thing actually ended up applying to ME rather than her, odd as that sounds. I had a girlfriend, who was easily in the 9 range, big tits, cute face, slim waist, anything a man could ask for physically. and her ideal pet name for me to call her was ‘bunnyface’. and bunnies are cute creatures to cuddle but you wouldnt fuck one. and the upshot of this is that within a couple months I found myself in the incredibly strange predicament of:
ok, i’m dating this rather hot girl, probably the hottest girl I ever have dated.
and I have no desire to fuck her whatsoever.
wtf?
I knew something was wrong with the petnames when I bumped into my ex. who is a good 30 lbs heavier than ‘bunnyface’.and I wanted to fuck my ex. and I still had no sexual desire for rabbit, though by all sane measures I should. and it dawned on me that something is seriously wrong here. pet names are evil.
LikeLike
I’m married and middle-aged, not the Roissy demographic.
But I do read and recommend Roissy.
This shit works, or at least helps, even if you’re the marrying kind. I’m one of those weirdos who thinks it’s really dirty to nail your best friend and get her to do stuff you’d never get a one-night-stand to put up with.
I have two nicknames for my wife: Sex Toy and Baby Love. She never knows which one I’ll call her, in public or not. If she’s signaling she wants to be my Sex Toy, she’s more likely to get called Baby Love at a party.
That Han Solo “I know” line has become our cliche. She says “I love you” and starts rolling her eyes even before I say anything, because I’m going to go: “Why wouldn’t you?” Or “Take a number and wait.” But one time in ten, I put out.
I’m 50, we’ve been married 7 years and she scratches my itches. She’s smart, she’s skinny, she cooks better than any of those food channel fags that she watches all the time. And I think she’s happier with me than she’s ever been.
Thanks, Roissy, for giving me advice on how not to screw it up.
What do women want? Not what they say they want.
LikeLike
The writer missed the most important thing about the second picture of this woman – she is utterly contemptuous of whoever is behind that camera.
In the picture of her when she was thirteen her eyes show naked terror.
(I do think that men these days need to be a lot more confident and assertive and women now are lost and crazy – but they have been conditioned into that miserable state intentionally.
Look into the archives of http://www.republicbroadcasting.org . Look for Deanna Spingola’s program when she interviewed a woman called Randy Engel and you will hear how it has been done and by whom – how they planned, back in the sixties to have everyone wear jeans which they said would becme tighter and tighter, and that women would go out to work more and more, be more and more stressed, that they would lose their femininity, would gradually lose their maternal instinct, and that the end of that process of social engineering would be that there would be sex without procreation and procreation without sex – and more and more of this nightmare that fe-manism has brought us.
LikeLike
[…] grab her hair again and pull her towards me, “come here, Sugartits.” [from […]
LikeLike