• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Long-Term Cohabitation Is Just As Good As Marriage
Cold Reading Is A Potent Seduction Tactic »

Someone Saved A Life Tonight

January 24, 2012 by CH

From a reader:

Wasn’t going to go out tonight, but decided a few beers were in order after watching Gingrich bullshit his way thru another debate.

Long story short…in the beer garden, overheard a tall skinny herb explaining his desire to kill himself over a woman.

Long story short, after disciplining him over giving two shits about what a woman thinks of him, took his phone, bookmarked the Chateau, and told him if he reads the articles and comments, his life will be changed in 6 months.

Peace. And thanks for all you do.

I bet the Chateau has saved more lives, literally and figuratively, than all the feminist blogs on the internet combined. A remarkable feat when you consider the exuberant hate with which this blog dispenses its very special lessons.

Prince of sex, king of love, suicide prevention hotline: Chateau Heartiste.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Self-aggrandizement, Vanity | 170 Comments

170 Responses

  1. on January 24, 2012 at 10:48 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    heartiste u publish da truth
    and da truth sets us free
    men need to see other men
    exhibiting da traditional male archetypes
    complete with brass balls
    with manly wit and wisdom
    with manly, godlike reason
    with manly, exalted logic
    for truth is beauty
    and beauty is truth
    and when a thousand pretty lies perish
    a million men are liberated, and ten million lives are saved.

    and now all of ye know
    dat da GBFM is really elton john
    and i dedicate this song
    to da great and wonderful heartiste

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 1:57 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      i was younger, hotter, tighter and fifty pounds lighter whenz i performed it in central parkz zlzozlzlz

      lzozozozozozo lzozozozozo

      LikeLike


  2. on January 24, 2012 at 10:51 am Murray F. Rottencrotch

    The White, Western, Occidental hamster exhausts himself relatively often, lately in history. RPMs are high but something is wrong.

    Some class of its population will have to discard beta, and rising beta, and match the low seriousness of the third world wave.

    A reclaimed unity, underneath motifs of individualism and rationalism.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 6:08 pm uh

      STFU and reopen your blog.

      LikeLike


  3. on January 24, 2012 at 10:57 am Rick Derris

    Your reader deserves major respect for this. Most people would probably just think the fellow was exaggerating but one can never tell.

    Hopefully the guy reads the articles and learns that a “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn” attitude will make him a better man.

    And this blog is indeed great!

    LikeLike


  4. on January 24, 2012 at 10:59 am Southern Man

    The lessons learned here have improved my life in many ways; in particular, my relationships with my children. But, oddly enough, the more I learn and practice game the less interested I am in women. I’m in the second half of my century and the last eighteen months is the longest I’ve gone without an LTR or GF since high school – and it doesn’t bother me in the least. Why is this? I should have a couple of decades of good sex left in me.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 5:06 pm Lara

      You’re just getting older, that’s all. Gaming women requires a lot of energy. Assuming the women you are trying to game are somewhat near your age, they should at least be a little easier to deal with.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 6:13 pm uh

      Agree with Lara. Game is an energy sink. Unless you have a big salary stoking your engine, old age will find you out of steam and uninterested.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 7:43 pm Johnycomelately

      Typical chick trying to equate male maturity with feminine decline, bullshit. Age has nothing to do with it, I’m in my 30s and I know guys in their 60s that run teenagers ragged.
      What you are experiencing Southern Man is a man’s typical reaction to uncovering game and that is that the prize is sometimes not worth the effort.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 7:44 pm Gramps

      I find the older I get the less interested I am in wasting time on chasing after sex. What a time sink!

      And, let’s not be too shy to say it. Once you understand women, they really aren’t very attractive people as a group, although there are always outstanding individuals in any group.

      And, Southern Man, you may be experiencing androgen deprivation syndrome. I had touch of that in my early 50’s, I thought. Young women cured that, hell yes! However, now that I am in my 60’s , I may have to visit my doctor or just stay home.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 11:34 am John Norman Howard

      Good comments, guys.

      LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 4:56 am Charlesz Martel

        In “The Game” it’s called “The Seducer’s Paradox”. The better one gets at game, and the more women you seduce, the less the whole thing seems to matter, I, too, am in the second half of my century.Gramps is right- women, as a group, are not very interesting or nice.

        I have fuck-closed women without much desire to do so (which paradoxically helps my game, as aloofness and disinterest can be majorly intriguing to women) just because I was running on auto-pilot. It’s like the man who learns how to make a lot of money, who keeps on doing it, without ever doing the things that he said he would do (when he was a young man) if he ever made money. He can’t get off the treadmill (his own “rationalization hamster”, after a fashion).

        Two amusing anecdotes about sex and aging.

        Georges Clemenceau was the Prime Minister of France 1906-1909, and again in 1917-1920. On his 80th birthday, he was ta cafe on the Champs-Elysee in Paris, when a pretty young girl walked by. He watched her, and then said to his friend:”Oh! To be 70 again!

        Sophocles is supposed to have said that losing his sex drive was like being uncoupled from a madman.

        Si jeunesse savait, si vieillesse pouvait!

        If youth only knew, if age only could!

        LikeLike


  5. on January 24, 2012 at 11:06 am zatarra

    I have done this 3 times. the next time I saw the individual, they thanked me profusely.

    LikeLike


  6. on January 24, 2012 at 11:23 am Maya

    “I bet the Chateau has saved more lives, literally and figuratively, than all the feminist blogs on the internet combined.”

    Me too. This blog is the most interesting and helpful thing I’ve ever found on the internet. ❤ you ****

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 1:17 pm Redleg

      Sometimes after Maya posts, I want to hang myself. How many people has Maya killed, that CH might have otherwise saved?

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 3:26 pm John Norman Howard

        I knew if I hung around long enough I’d find something on which to agree with Redleg.

        Small victory, but one for the left side nonetheless.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 3:59 pm Redleg

        Victory for the middle, Herr Howard. You can call me all manner of things, but never call me a lefty.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 11:52 pm John Norman Howard

        “Left side” is an expression for a “win column”…

        “Put it on the left side” = “chalk one up in the win column”.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 9:17 am Redleg

        Then put one up on the right side, for my useless English degree.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:37 am John Norman Howard

        Touche`

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 3:52 pm Maya

        I’m sorry if I ever hurt anyone here. I didn’t mean to. I sincerely want everyone here to feel good about themselves and to find ❤ L *O* V* E ❤

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 4:28 pm itsme

        8=============>

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:01 am Ben

        Here’s your love, slut: 8==============> … .. .

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 6:16 pm uh

        How much money have PUAs pissed away on cover charges and drinks at clubs for lousy fucked-out sluts?

        What if we had all donated to Ron Paul instead?

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 11:54 pm John Norman Howard

        We’d still be careening headlong into oblivion, as White men, in this land area between Wall Street and Sunset Boulevard called the USA.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 8:06 am Redleg

        He’d still alienate the political plutocracy and never make it to office.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 2:42 pm uh

        Very true. Can’t you call someoneberg, Redlegstein?

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 8:10 am Redleg

        If only your belief in ZOG and my connection to it was real. I like Ron Paul, I wish he could get a fair shake in a real election.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 7:00 pm RVT

      Maya, your clumsy limbic spasming is a pleasant escape from the dry logical tone the comments usually take. I consider you one of the most enjoyable commenters here.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 6:56 pm King A's Bastard Son

        Actually Maya is an annoying cunt — and the sooner she stops posting, the better. As I’ve said before….there must be a way to stop this snatch from clogging up this blog with her inane ramblings.

        LikeLike


  7. on January 24, 2012 at 11:25 am Nyk

    think of all the lives (not to mention time) you would help save if you just put links to the archives, so everyone can easily find posts chronologically!

    Every second wasted on retrieving older posts could be spent getting pussy, y’know…

    LikeLike


  8. on January 24, 2012 at 11:41 am Rant Casey - BR

    I have done this 3 times as well. All the 3, kept a cynical smile on theyr faces, and retorted that “you know, everyone’s different”. All the 3 were still being LJBFed, dumped prematurely or being beta bitchboys of girlfriends, the next time I saw them.

    You know… you can take the horse to the river, but you cant force it to drink the water.

    Sometimes it seems to me that the most desperate are the most likely to be open to learn something that actually works. Perhaps because they are already hopeless – or maybe cause they already tried all the wrong ways do it; or maybe both.

    And betas who do relatively well although they commit many slips – some of them are keen, and willing to improve, and just dont know how to.

    Now the beta who can get himself girls on ocasion, and keeps them for a few months on the basis of submiting to her whims – I dont waste my time on them. These are the most tenacious in theyr betaness: because theyr ankle grabbing assures them three or four months of female company, they believe its the right thing to do, and its all a matter of findind “the right one” (meaning, one who would reward submission with presence, ethernally).

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 10:58 pm Anonymous

      They should see this… how to display higher value (DHV) or just be a douchebag– either way, they’ll better off.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 11:59 pm YaReally

      “Sometimes it seems to me that the most desperate are the most likely to be open to learn”

      It’s only after you’ve lost everything that you’re free to do anything.

      Most guys who fail at getting good at game fail because they didn’t hit actual rock-bottom yet so they half-assed and “dabbled” with it and moved on. Once you have absolutely nothing and have finally given up after trying everything else, that’s when you become humble enough to admit you need to change and that’s when you become motivated enough to change.

      LikeLike


  9. on January 24, 2012 at 11:51 am Hung One on You

    Was texting back this smoke show blonde this morning that I’m trying to bang after she agreed to meet met up for drinks again so i can try to close the deal and fuck her.

    I was consciously thinking about what i should write and say and i straight up remembered this post you wrote way back in the day.

    “An excerpt from the book of Alpha.”

    https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2007/04/11/excerpt-from-the-book-of-alpha/

    Def a hall of fame post. She writes this long winded text with jokes and all this other bullshit saying she is down for drinks again. I text back.

    “Cool, i’ll text you thursday with the details.”

    Owe my demeanor and my changed persona toward women all to you.

    When i get flustered, confused and down on myself because I can’t figure out how to handle a piece of ass…I kindly mumble to myself..>”what would an asshole do?”

    Owe it all to this blog. God Bless You.

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 11:02 am Ben

      Hear Hear!

      LikeLike


  10. on January 24, 2012 at 11:56 am askjoe

    I wonder, is experiential learning required? Does one break through the glass ceiling of beauty to which they can comfortably talk to by books and attitude alone? Can a guy learn that bitches be fungible through talk alone. Probably not, so get out there and dies trying, at least now you’ll be forewarned, eh?

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 6:19 pm uh

      lozozoz

      “bitches be fungible”

      and for that reason, often fungal …

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:03 am Ben

        HA … HA HA

        LikeLike


  11. on January 24, 2012 at 12:18 pm Anonymous

    Sterile man pays neighbor to impregnate his wife (9). Neighbor is also sterile and knows it, but takes the money and bangs his neighbor’s wife 72 times:

    http://imgur.com/GTomc

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 2:36 pm itsme

      the article wasn’t clear on whether maus (the cock for hire) knew that he himself was sterile. it says ‘the doctor’s announcement that maus was also sterile shocked everyone except his wife, who was forced to confess that maus was not the real father of their two children’, so it’s quite possible that he didn’t know, which of course means that his wife cuckolded him.

      i bet his wife didn’t look like the woman he was paid to bang….

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 11:00 pm Anonymous

        Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive…

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 4:56 pm Student

      its funny until you realize its fake. if it was true, and an actual court case, this would be all over the news. yet not one reputable newspaper mentions it. nothing in germany, which is weird because Bild and other tabloids would be all over this. not even the daily mail took the bait on this one.

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 8:52 pm old guy, lower case

      HAWHAWHAAAAAWHAWHAWHAW hahahahahahahah

      Thanks, I needed that.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 1:03 am Anon

      For fuck sake, bitches will never stop cuckolding the shit out of men, will they?

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 1:04 am Anon

        Fuck ’em. Fuck ’em all.

        LikeLike


  12. on January 24, 2012 at 12:28 pm GeishaKate

    There are many sites that save lives…kudos for being one of them.

    LikeLike


  13. on January 24, 2012 at 12:55 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    lzozolzlzoz

    all da feminist blogs have killed millions over fifty million dead by da abortions da fetus baby killing propageted by da neoocnths feminist preemepitive warz aginats da unbrornz lzozlzlzlzlzoz

    http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Divorce/nwo_agenda.htm

    “If you don’t already know it, divorce is one of the agendas of the New World Order. There is an evil agenda at work to destroy your marriage! Women have fallen hook, line and sinker for all the lies of feminism. This is why over 50,000,000 American women have killed their own babies by abortion, falsely thinking that they have been “liberated.” That is how Satan operates, i.e., he robs you of everything near and dear to you while making you think he’s doing you a favor:
    People go to church to worship statues in idolatry; but Satan tells them they are serving God.
    Women divorce, destroying their own marriages; but Satan tells them they did a good thing.
    Women murder their own children by abortion; but Satan tells them they are responsible adults.
    Politicians lie continually, breaking all their campaign promises; but Satan leads people to support them anyway.
    While Americans have lost their jobs, homes and pensions; Satan makes them think they are living in a free country.
    American women today are so entitled, angry and selfish. Women have been engineered by the Rockefellers to be paranoid, intolerant, and discontent. Feminism has destroyed America.

    Colossians 4:1, “Masters, give unto your servants that which is just and equal; knowing that ye also have a Master in Heaven.” Jesus died for our sins to set us free from the bondage of the Law. In return, as believers we ought to be willing to be slaves for Christ. For those who selfishly choose to live by their own rules instead of God’s, they are slaves to sin. John 8:34, “Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.” Everyone is under someone’s authority. That’s just an inescapable fact of life. Whether you care to admit it or not, it is true nonetheless. You either obey God or else Satan is your god.

    Satan has successfully used the evils of feminism, greed, and a corrupt legal system to destroy men, marriages and families. Whether it be the rebellion of feminism, the murder of abortion, the indoctrination of evolution, the hellhole public school system, the open borders, the dishonest legal system, government welfare, the sexual immorality and Devil worship promoted by Rock music, the smut and violence on television, the lying mainstream newsmedia, relocating American jobs overseas; it is all intended by Satan to kill, steal and destroy everything near and dear to you (John 10:10).

    Most lawyers and judges are the scum of the earth. They chuckle and laugh now, but their victims will be laughing when they are cast into the lake of Fire for ever. They’ll lie about their own mother to make a buck. Since there’s money to be made, lawyers will portray anyone as a victim for any reason. It’s a big racket in America, and evil to the core. Judges and lawyers are so corrupt nowadays in the U.S. If a man calls his wife a name, she is automatically deemed as a victim, gets free section 8 welfare housing, free Food stamps and free legal representation. It’s as evil as anything God hates. Those women ought to starve on the streets for being rebellious and giving their husbands a hard time. God pity the foolish women who embrace the lies of feminism.

    Literally, lawyers are paid by the government to break up your marriage. There’s much money to be made in divorce. The judge(s), lawyers and everyone involved make money except the husband who gets crucified by the court system. Statistics show that women file for divorce at more than TWICE the rate of men in the U.S. Divorce is a harmful and perpetuating sin.” –http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Divorce/nwo_agenda.htm

    lzozozlzolzozozlo

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 3:02 am atheist one

      Fuck me, Wat? Gbfm unhinged.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 11:20 am John Norman Howard

      Now THAT’S the GBFM we’ve all come to know and love… right on track again… preaching the true Word… where no punches are pulled, and many paunches are punched.

      LikeLike


    • on January 26, 2012 at 12:32 am Mark Slater

      Excellent, GB4M! I will have to take another peek at your catalog.

      LikeLike


  14. on January 24, 2012 at 1:09 pm Michael Maier

    The mentality of Game is a life saver for sure. The great part is that your successes build up themselves quickly, and your insights into the “workings” of the female mind do too.

    LikeLike


  15. on January 24, 2012 at 1:10 pm James A

    “Sometimes it seems to me that the most desperate are the most likely to be open to learn something that actually works. Perhaps because they are already hopeless – or maybe cause they already tried all the wrong ways do it; or maybe both.”

    This seems like the truth to me. In my case, I was aware of the existence of this side of the net long before I started reading it and educating myself. But since I was a pussy who had been indoctrinated in how good women are and how players are assholes, I avoided reading any of this until, after a particularly sad and depressive stretch, I said “fuck it” and clicked over and read everything I could.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 6:22 pm uh

      I avoided it too, in part because I was caught up with white nationalist blogs that disdain R / Game for beta-pedestrian reasons. I also knew that the purpose is to drive men into the fray, where I don’t like to be — not because I’m shy so much as hateful and bored by it all.

      LikeLike


  16. on January 24, 2012 at 1:24 pm Tacomaster

    When I was in the Air Force I used to get the suicide reports monthly and read over them. It was a shame that roughly 80% of the suicides were contributed to a recent breakup of a girl. It was very disheartening to see.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 3:29 pm John Norman Howard

      That’s become a favorite feminist meme… witness An Officer And A Gentleman, for one. :gag:

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 10:11 pm Uncle Elmer

        Even better, the porn version : An Officer and a GenitalMan

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 10:34 pm tacomaster

        Not really into the whole “military porn” genre. It’s not very authentic.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 6:59 pm Ian

        Regardless of whether it’s a feminist meme it’s still true. It should be no surprise that beta little bitches that tie up all their self worth in their relationships are A: more prone to depression and suicide and B: more likely to commit the act after being dumped.

        There’s nothing worse than losing that which you base your self-worth on.

        LikeLike


      • on February 12, 2012 at 7:13 pm thisisagibberishemailaddress2@hotmail.com

        Yes, true. Every word you said is true.

        But sometimes a person is in that position exactly. They loved someone so much the other person did become their main reason for living. Sometimes the pain is too great to bear and suicide makes sense to that person, rather than face a life without their love — if they have the physical courage.

        LikeLike


  17. on January 24, 2012 at 1:32 pm BD

    This post is exactly the reason you should provide a link right on the homepage for your Dave From Hawaii relationship game week post. Seriously, millions of dudes need that article to counteract their knee-jerk reaction to click away from this site and avoid “all the ass-hole pickup shit” they think they’ll find. Like me, they simply have no idea how beneficial game is to understanding all interpersonal interactions (marriage, work, pick-up). That article was the ah-ha moment for me, but until that point I had read an article here and there on your site, but still wasn’t sure.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 6:24 pm Joe Blow

      Exactly what happened to me as well BD. The improvement in my marriage has been remarkable and I am still in awe. My wife has gone from a grumpy bitch to someone I can fuck whenever I like.

      LikeLike


  18. on January 24, 2012 at 1:43 pm Anonymous

    Too bad he’s going to come here and be immediately turned off by all the political posts. This blog has become about 1/5 game and 4/5 reactionary drivel.

    [heartiste: why don’t you count up the game and sexual dynamics posts vs the political posts from the past three months for an accurate ratio instead of pulling shit out of your ass?]

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 2:41 pm ru2586

      As much as I can’t stand the reactionary politics of Heartiste, this is simply inaccurate. Heartiste posts way more on game and dynamics…. and I’m a daily reader of this blog. Each and every word, with dozens of posts saved to my hard drive.

      Even the bashing of feminism is spot on; the anti-immigrant race-baiting is simply distasteful and misguided.

      Male workers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your betadom!

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 2:46 pm Murray F. Rottencrotch

      WAHHHH REACTIONARY DRIVELLLLLL NOT LIKE THE DRIVELLLLLL I’M SPOONFED BY MY PC MEDIA PRIESTHOOD HANDLERS

      LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 3:42 pm John Norman Howard

      ‘Reactionary’ is invariably taken to mean an ultra-conservative desire for a return to the past.

      Politically speaking, the posts here which so offend your sensibilities are more a desire for a New Order of White civilization without the burden of non-Whites, hence quite revolutionary.

      In short, asshole, nobody wants to hear happy darkies singin’ in the fields anymore.

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 3:55 am ru2586

        John Norman Howard, you’re a vile racist piece of shit. Name-calling is warranted here.

        Nothing about your ‘revolutionary’ vision of a white future is appealing, correct, or possible.

        Stop trolling, and start reading and reflecting.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 10:12 am DiamondEyes

        “you’re a vile racist piece of shit. Name-calling is warranted here.”
        Exhibit A on the logic involved in deconstructing Mr. Howard.

        If you cannot see the connection between game, feminism, cultural marxism, international jewry, immigration, human biodiversity, evo-psych, and politics, you are just not fully awake yet. It’s important that these subjects be addressed here from time to time, as they are all interrelated. This blog has already incriminated itself by peeling the lies away from forbidden topics that no other blog will touch, so it may as well go full bore and address all of these third-rail topics now and then. It just reveals the intellectual depth we are dealing with in the author and many of the commenters. If you are a non-white, and threatened by any hints of white nationalism, you should get yourself educated and see how separatism benefits all races equally. If you are a leftist, you won’t get far in PUA until you shed those beta-boy leftist beliefs, brother.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 10:27 am Redleg

        Always with the international Jewry, oi vey.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:39 am John Norman Howard

        No back is so tender as one’s own, nicht wahr?

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:54 am Redleg

        I hate to kvetch but it’s so true.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 3:50 pm uh

        Every woman loves a fascist.

        Fascists believe in borders, rules, looking sharp, and forthright speech.

        Liberals believe in sidewalk chalk, pita for lunch, no borders, and tote bags.

        With whom is the blond serving you drinks going home?

        The only successful liberals are those who practice yoga (order) and wear North Face shit (sharpness, DHV).

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 3:35 am xsplat

        You’re not paying attention. Hipsters have a successful sexual strategy also.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 1:55 pm uh

        Haven’t we moved past unkindness?

        In fact it crossed my mind to include a clause that hipster mating strategy is a fashion bubble in select cities and venues; I assumed those “paying attention” would take this for granted and not trouble my breezy classification.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 2:21 pm xsplat

        And what of bohemians and the like?

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:05 am John Norman Howard

        ru2586, who do you suppose cares what you think?

        When I want to hear from an asshole, I’ll fart.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 8:20 pm James

        Ru2586

        I have no idea how someone can see through the:

        “Gender is a social construct created by evil white men to keep women down”

        lie and yet still believe the:

        “Ethnicity is a social construct created by evil white men to keep everyone else down”

        lie.

        No man who practices game should voice politically correct pieties unless it is part of a strategy for gettying laid.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 7:10 pm Ian

        Read The 10,000 Year Explosion if you want to be an educated racist, but STFU until you’ve done that.

        Look, there are actual differences between racial groups. To suggest otherwise is madness. However the differences are statistical, and spread over the population, so it is still unacceptable to discriminate against people of the basis of race.

        Yes, black people tend to respond to insults to their status through increased risk taking and short-term investment strategies (like joining a gang), whereas Asians tend to work even harder and pursue long-term investment strategies (like opening a store and saving to put the kids through college). This is a logical reaction to the environments in which those races evolved, ie tribal warfare vs peaceful rice farming.

        However within any particular group there is a whole ecosystem of individual temperaments. There are lazy beta Asians and there are hard-working alpha black men. You can’t just lump them all together.

        What a wise immigration and social policy should seek to do is get rid of people with a negative genotype, and bring in more people with a positive genotype, regardless of race. People who breed fast, die young and survive on public benefits are being driven by a specific genetic strategy – that cycle needs to be broken. People who risk everything to immigrate to a far-off country are often long-term investment intelligent alphas – those people need to be identified and encouraged.

        Racists who can’t think clearly about this kind o stuff need to either lift their game or STFU.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 3:50 pm Anonymous

      I have no issue with the feminism rollback agenda. I think that’s all under the game umbrella. It’s the immigration, race baiting, and financial stuff that I have a problem with.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 6:28 pm uh

        Gone is Anonymous’ tuff-gai attitude of yore. What happened, buddy?

        ” … where cliché shows merely the absence of thought, modern Duckspeak has a real purpose, sorry, a focused objective. It is essentially the same as Big Brother’s – to identify the speaker and the audience as loyalists.

        If the speaker or writer can use Duckspeak without hestitation or embarrassment and the listener or reader can take it without twitching or reaching for a revolver, they are believers in the true faith.”

        http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/Bookshop/article.asp?item=612

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 11:02 pm Anonymous

        Depends which Anonymous you’re talking ’bout, Willis.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 12:19 am Anonymous

        Just didn’t want to be misunderstood. It’s the borderline neo-racism that I have the problem with and what I meant by reactionary politics. I agree with the evo-psych perspective on feminism. I’ve pointed people here in the past and their comments are invariably “how can you read that guy?” because of the race stuff, not because of the game stuff.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:13 am John Norman Howard

        When Whites are minority in America, and all your erstwhile brothers of colour seem to forget that you’re “one of the good ones”, harken back to your words on this day… and how off-putting “the race stuff” was to you.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 2:48 pm uh

        Yea, well, that’s when you shove them out of the Overton windo — instead, you’ve wilted.

        The same evo-psych perspective validates “the race stuff”. It’s all there for you to find. Your timid worldview accomplishes the same Crimestop about natural selection and racial differences, as feminism does to sexuality.

        Something is holding you back, then. What is it? are you merely the wuss you appear to be, or do you cherish “black friends” and other token inhibitors of self-regard?

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 8:22 pm James

        The same arguments used to justify feminism are used to justify “Anti-racism”.

        Don’t worry, you will see the truth one day, we all do in the end no matter how much we deny it.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 3:10 am Anonymous

        The one mistake I believe Heartiste makes with immigration is that he forgets that he will, after age 40, have to live in a non-feminist country to avoid the hatred of older males that feminists propagate in the west and get the younger, hotter, tighter he knows he wants.

        When he’s a foreigner invading another country, he won’t appreciate local nationalistic politics that disadvantage those who weren’t born where he wants to live.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:48 am itsme

        nah, a guy in his 40’s with game can bang young hot tight chicks even in a feminist country.

        the ‘hatred of older males’ that feminists propagate were the death shrieks of withered harpies who fell into the chasm of sexual irrelevancy. it takes a while for the sound to reach the top.

        if anything, it’s that immigration will result in smaller and smaller numbers of young hot tight females of the physical type that heartsie prefers.

        LikeLike


      • on February 12, 2012 at 7:16 pm thisisagibberishemailaddress2@hotmail.com

        Probably true — in which case it is the early 50s where one should seriously consider pulling the plug on their own life through suicide.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 7:46 am Lara

        I know other men who feel the same way. The more I’ve thought about it, I think immigration and the push for diversity makes feminism worse.

        [heartiste: oh, it definitely does. the mechanism by which this happens is somewhat complicated, so it is out of reach of understanding by the mediocre masses beyond a visceral subconscious grasp that something is not quite right in the nation. i plan to address this topic in a future post.]

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 9:35 am Lara

        I have a little insight into how the Anglo American female mind works. I’ve come to the conclusion, that a lot of their feminism was really just a polite mask for their racism and ethnocentrism. I’ll look forward to hearing what you have to say on the topic.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:09 am Ben

        “I’ve come to the conclusion, that a lot of their feminism was really just a polite mask for their racism and ethnocentrism”

        Right on the money there.

        (Man Jaw Mcgraw herself in the news recently:

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_V8_kUVynQ )

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:11 am John Norman Howard

        What world have you been visiting?

        Feminism is anti-White to the core.

        If these so-called feminist Anglo-American wymyn showed any modicum of ethnocentrism or pride in their heritage, I’d don a pink ribbon myself.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 3:42 pm uh

        Let me try to give a rough outline of the memes at play here, John.

        Lara makes two claims.

        – Immigration/diversity (already falsifying the racial disaster of desegregation by foisting the blame entirely on [by implication Latino] immigrants) worsens feminism

        – Feminism was/is a mask for racism/ethnocentrism

        The first claim I have just disproved in a comment still in queue.

        The second is more insidious in that it leaves out the race of the most successful modern feminists, Jewish of course, and maintains that only the Anglo-American, i.e. White feminists are covert racists.

        So as ever, the six-million pound elephant of Jewish ethnocentrism is “whitewashed”, and we’re left with a humdrum charge that feminists are Disingenuous White Liberals with some very warped “white anxiety”.

        Whole books have been written about Margaret Sanger and early Feminism’s flirtation with the Eugenics movement, which has now entered popular demonology and joined der Chef as One Of The Worst Things Everrr, of course. Here’s where the matter becomes a thicket of complex considerations.

        – Sanger supported the notion of the gradual elimination of the unfit through eugenic means and was known for holding the bloodless superior/inferior racial dialectic of the age — but also worked in the projects and with Dubois

        – Feminists / women today still support practices which arose from eugenic concerns (abortion, birth control, art-sem) — but owing to their lateness have thrown themselves behind pandering to non-whites and welcoming race-replacement, and have become so goodthinking that even when they are mugged by diversity and raped by reality, they don’t associate these facts with their own pro-replacement ideology

        So the idea is essentially that feminists are DWLs who want safe white neighborhoods for themselves and “enriched” neighborhoods for everyone else, art-sem and high-investment parenting for themselves, broods of non-whites and Planned Parenthood for everyone else. This is a black-and-white picture of the state of affairs but is mostly true. It means that white women, despite public commitment and very real neuronal attachment to notions of “equality” and “cibo rights” arising from their innate tend-befriend strategy, in practice still prefer to live among and mate with their own …. if they have the money to do so, which feminists often have.

        All Lara has done is misread even this unconscious kin preference as explicit “racism” — while missing the very real mask worn by Jewish feminists, and Jewish public figures in general, obsessing over mixed marriages “in the Jewish community” (the race that is a religion that is both that is neither that is a race) and aggressively promoting mixing for whites through the grand hydra of Media, Academia and Government.

        Despite, then, all the very obvious work professional feminists and unprofessional womenfolk have done to further the cultural sabotage of immigration and the diversity cult, Jewish and Anglo, Lara’s own brainwashing flares up for one last anti-“racist” witch-hunt — White feminists, sick as they are, are really nothing but “racists”.

        Again, one must distinguish the implicit from the explicit. Obviously White feminists are not explicit “racists”. Even if blacks and latinos utilize Planned Parenthood more often than whites, which I am not at all ready to believe, feminists’ commitment to abortion is not implicit ethnocentrism. The truth is that their “racism” lies in where they lie at night — no in ghettos, and not with non-whites, typically, i.e. their habitation and mating preferences are still kin-based, as one would expect for a member of a distinct race shaped by natural selection over time. At most, one could argue that they have, like their Jewish preceptors, used non-whites as a proxy for their hatred of white men, whose attentions they do not merit, but here again, the Jewish feminist is a much clearer candidate, bringing far more psychologically to the culture-war than an ugly disgruntled New England shrew.

        But this is all beside the point of the “feminists as racists” meme — which of course is to reinforce the “racism” stigma in the public mind, i.e. a swipe at feminism riding on another more entrenched taboo. And this is why so many come out against “political stuff” on this blog. They just have not the intestinal fortitude to stand with us against the New Discipline. And of course all the yidden slither out to flick their tongues at the disobedient goyim.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 6:21 pm Diomedes

        Freakzill-uh, start a blog. It would be very appreciated.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 12:20 pm itsme

        feminists are pushing for a reality in which they can eat, pray, love without leaving their neighborhood.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 3:04 pm uh

        “The more I’ve thought about it, I think immigration and the push for diversity makes feminism worse.”

        Backward.

        Feminism has worsened immigration and diversity-mongering. The most driven pushers of the diversity cult and mass amnesty are feminists, in this order:

        – Jewish feminists (Borscht Belt, Left Coast)
        – Anglo-American feminists (New England set)
        – Hispanic / Other feminists (Western states, New York)

        In England and Scandinavia this cancer reached the highest levels of government, local and nation, two or three decades ago, and you see that both nations are wracked by vast out of control darkie hordes.

        Women are evolved to widen their circle of concern and level group differences to ensure their and their offspring’s safety. In modern context becomes pro-immigration and anti-“racism”.

        Simple as that. It is not Mexicans’ fault that feminism exists, and their presence in se does not exacerbate it. At most, it affords certain energetic, conceited mestizas opportunity to dress in business suits and pumps, and after a four year “Latino Women Studies” BA take up a job at the local Minitrue office agitating for the further dispossession of the white race. In California, for example, I am finding them as secretaries of various unions — which means of course that Latino applications for membership will float magically to the top of the stack, no racism.

        I say again: you have it precisely backward.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 5:03 pm Lara

        Thanks for your responses. My guess is Jewish feminists will be shrewd enough to absolve themselves of all blame, and the Anglo feminists will get all of it.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 5:19 pm Lara

        Anglo Americans were never virulent racists or anti-semites, only mildly so. We did used to be very ethnocentric.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 6:43 pm uh

        True. Btw that wasn’t an ad hominem against you — just the notion you advanced.

        Please however use better English. “We were once very ethnocentric”, or “We used to be … “

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 10:13 pm John Norman Howard

        Well done, uh.

        I was already well-aware of the hypocrisy of feminists, indeed, SWPLs in general, in re preaching diversity whilst living in gated communities… and of course, that of the Masters of the genre… those Jewish feminists leading the charge… though feminism “is not really Jewish” (wink, wink).

        But if that’s White ‘racism’, it’s a cowering, craven sort that is of no use in securing the existence of our people and a true future for White children.

        Any creed/philosophy/whatever which allies itself with the whole PC agenda of anti-racism is merely a code word for anti-White, and it’s maddening that our own women are in all-too-many cases siding with “sisters” over their own men, and even going so far as to wink a flirty eye at race-mixing, when they’re not killing the few precious White babies in their very wombs during their most fertile years, so they can pursue alleged self-fulfillment.

        Ergo, regardless of how they live/talk amongst themselves, anyone White openly favoring feminist/PC agenda cannot be ethnocentric, racist, or whatever the current leftist epithet might be.

        And goddammit… capitalize White(s).

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 3:36 am uh

        “and it’s maddening that our own women are in all-too-many cases siding with “sisters” over their own men, ”

        Maddening, but explicable. Never forget that sex predates race. While sexual strategies are more amenable than competition for resources among peoples, yet there is ever-abiding tension between the sexes which lately, very lately indeed, has been politicized by females of the hostile minority in service of their ethnic strategy, kept well out of view of the target audience.

        Women have always conspired and gossiped. What we call an “evolutionary strategy” today was to the ancients the common wisdom of mankind about female behavior. All Jewish feminism has had them do is conspire more viciously against their own. That said, it can’t produce the desired result — white women bedding with non-whites more than they do with white men, knowing on which side the bread is buttered (mestizos, usually more provident kaffirs, often secure their dubious affections for stable relationship); and the white birthright dropping to zero. These are two stable traits of white American sociobiology: at the end of the day they prefer their own kind despite the New Discipline, and they want children. The latter likely still depends on the bygone expansion / American Dream paradigmata, which are at last being replaced with a new paradigm of urban crowding and habitat loss, mimicking Europe in a country with twice its landmass. This is definitely a transitional phase.

        Most of the abortions in the former white world are in Russia and Europe. Not minimizing the American woman’s contribution to the ranks of dead embryos, but it is smaller than those peoples’.

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 4:28 pm Redleg

      Get real. He’ll be turned off by the banner.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 6:29 pm uh

        loozozozozozzz

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 4:36 am Caffeine

        lol.

        LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 11:07 am Ben

      Who are these lefty “Anonymous” fags coming on here and continually whining?

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 12:56 pm Matt

        Being a lefty and being an alpha are completely incompatible. Conservatism and Libertarianism are the ways of real men.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 8:28 pm James

        While no political orientation gives real man status automatically:

        -Trad Cons CAN be real men,

        -libertarians CAN be real men,

        -lefties cannot be real men unless it is only a skin deep disguise being used to give an otherwise Alpha male a sheen of cuddly.

        LikeLike


  19. on January 24, 2012 at 1:48 pm Ollie

    Piece by piece, bit by bit, inch by inch, man by man, we will take down the fembot disease that is destroying this country.

    LikeLike


  20. on January 24, 2012 at 1:50 pm Anon

    Eh, fuck ’em. Let them weed themselves out.

    But it would’ve been a great neg-opener: “Hey, that guy over there is about to kill himself over a girl… you should fuck him.”

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 3:43 pm John Norman Howard

      Golf clap… nothing like appealing to their maternal instincts. :bwaaa haaaa:

      LikeLike


  21. on January 24, 2012 at 3:06 pm Artful Dodger

    Newt Gingrich is an alpha male, btw.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 11:02 pm Anonymous

      More ballz in his pinky than RINOmney has total.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 12:57 pm Matt

      True dat.

      LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 8:29 pm James

      Still would not want to vote for him, but yes he clearly is.

      LikeLike


  22. on January 24, 2012 at 3:17 pm Artful Dodger

    Proof of Newt’s alphaness:

    “Up until only days before the South Carolina primary, Mitt Romney had a commanding lead among women voters while Newt Gingrich enjoyed the opposite dynamic with men. By the time the final ballots were cast today, exit polls showed Newt Gingrich had received more votes from women than any other candidate. Political pundits are crediting Gingrich’s surge with women voters to his “alpha male performance” at the two South Carolina debates this week.”

    http://www.examiner.com/independent-in-national/dems-women-evangelicals-give-gingrich-sc-win

    NBC’s Andrea Mitchell even said that Newt was quoted saying that he “could make you believe that red is blue and blue is red” because he conveyed his message with such “passion.” She in fact stated that this “passion” was a big reason for his success among women voters. Talk about reframing.

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 5:06 pm Adam

      And just think: he’s been married three times. Any woman or hardcore Christan would vote against him on that basis alone. Yet they are the groups that voted for him the most. Game is like magic.

      Heartiste, want to do an article about game in politics?

      LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 1:01 am King A

        Adam wrote: “Any woman or hardcore Christan would vote against him on that basis alone.”

        You managed to misunderstand the Christian vote, conservatism, and Christianity all in one nugget of regurgitated MSM conventional wisdom. But that’s between you and your amateur punditry license.

        I’m glad people are coming around to the glory of Gingrich. He has been a player for so long and has made so many enemies that it would be a bad sign if he didn’t get negative press about “grandiosity” and “inconsistency” and “lack of discipline.” The petulant backlash from the pipsqueak platoons are the cris-de-coeur of haters reacting to forty years of alpha in their midst.

        Make no mistake. Beta bleating, when organized, can outnumber and outlast any solitary alpha. The backlash has already knocked down the speaker’s momentum twice: in the summer, and then in Iowa-New Hampshire. Newton Leroy is fat, with a reedy voice and bad haircut, he looks like a fart-sniffing elf, your maniacal grandpa with a maniacal smile. Caricature comes easy, too easy. His name is Newt, for fucksake. This website is a parody, but not a total parody. And yet, somehow he seduces. It shouldn’t be! He’s got 57% negative ratings! How can he win! Where have we heard that before? Both politics and game thrive because conventional wisdom is so persistent yet so wrong.

        There is a reason Gingrich has dominated every debate from day one. Put aside the media caricature and scandales du jour and listen to the man speak. There is a reason he single-handedly invented the very idea of a countrywide Republican majority after sixty years of nearly unbroken Democratic dominance, nationalizing a campaign when everyone thought a takeover was quixotic. Newt is the master of frame control. Compared to the shuffling and accommodating betabot Willard Mitt, the electoral attraction to Gingrich is visceral, undeniable, irresistible, inexplicable, and more than a little embarrassing to admit. Just like alpha pull. “I shouldn’t like this guy! I hate him, in fact! He’s just so wrong for me! And yet….”

        My first political consciousness was wrapped up in the 1994 Newtron Bomb. For modern conservatism, there was the Goldwater beachhead, the Reagan revolution and then the Gingrich confirmation of a quarter-century’s efforts. Every Republican before or since has drawn from the tradition of milquetoasty Gerald Ford/George Bushian “kinder, gentler” Northeast faux-conservative faggotry.

        Gingrich is what game looks like in national politics. We are used to elevating champions of the beta aesthetic in our politics — such is our generation’s zeitgeist. And hey, women still vote. In a republic we will always get the leadershit we deserve. But an organic upsurge of inchoate pissed-offedness from middle America has lately created a phenomenon the doltish media only knows how to label “Tea Party.” It is the most potent force in politics, still seeking a leader to articulate its demands with consistency. The only question remains, how much manliness is left in the electorate? Will we once again select the usual superficially competent technocrat and vomit forth a representative of our collective weakness, or will we roll the dice and give the lil-bit-scary wildcard his chance? If the electorate is still as anxious and enraged as it was in ’10, the climate has never been more ready to eschew the Nixons, Fords, and Bushes for the Goldwaters, Reagans, and Gingriches.

        Romney is the safe guy. I must say, I don’t have much experience with a woman’s reaction to beta, but as a voter and thereby the object of a suitor’s attentions during this campaign season, I am beginning to feel the primal contempt for AFC weakness from a woman’s point of view. Yes, Gingrich is the riskier bet. But thanks to C-SPAN, the internet, and the debates, I have an unfiltered view of the man, and our media filters are nothing but beta bitchery that produces politicians too small for the moment. It’s no accident that Gingrich has built his campaign around annihilating those media distortion fields in magnificent, chest-thumping style.

        Get used to saying President Newt. If not, we will have succumbed to political pansy betadom, probably for good.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:27 am John Norman Howard

        Bravo… I usually applaud only the pithy and economical expressions, but all here should read your analysis of this Gingrich phenomenon.

        That said, under the current political system, if he’s the best we can hope for, then we’re surely as far along towards doom as we fear… and the best we can hope for is the end won’t occur merely with a whimper.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 1:13 pm anonymous

        How is it misunderstanding Christianity to understand that Newt is breaking Jesus’ rule against divorce and remarriage.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 9:38 pm King A

        Your misunderstanding of Christianity is the typically legalistic interpretation that has confounded outsiders since the beginning.

        “For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.” The Torah of the old covenant was not overturned, it was fulfilled. The laws were not reversed, they were superseded. Christ did not bring rules to follow, he brought the Spirit.

        If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am a noisy gong or a clanging cymbal.

        And if I have prophetic powers, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing.

        If I give away all I have, and if I deliver my body to be burned, but have not love, I gain nothing.

        In other words, Jesus’ famous reproach of the Pharisees (which got him executed) was about living the spirit of the covenant rather than all too Jewish exactitude in law.

        Again he entered the synagogue, and a man was there who had a withered hand. And they watched him, to see whether he would heal him on the sabbath, so that they might accuse him.

        And he said to the man who had the withered hand, “Come here.” And he said to them, “Is it lawful on the sabbath to do good or to do harm, to save life or to kill?” But they were silent.

        And he looked around at them with anger, grieved at their hardness of heart, and said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He stretched it out, and his hand was restored.

        The Pharisees went out, and immediately held counsel with the Herodians against him, how to destroy him.

        Rules are there to facilitate a life in the Spirit. The Lord’s mercy is all-consuming, immediate, and automatic to the contrite heart. Outsiders just perceive the harshness of commandment and restriction and miss this essence of Christianity within a context that can only be properly appreciated from the inside.

        Gingrich is a late-life Catholic convert. His follies from the past are inextricable from the misguidance of Protestant heresy, which, like you, misconstrues the fullness of the faith in various idiosyncratic ways. Further, though his sins be as scarlet, they were made white as snow; though they were red like crimson, they became as wool. He washed his robes “white in the blood of the Lamb.”

        No one knows the sincerity of Gingrich’s contrition, and therefore his reconciliation: that’s between him and his maker, and is in fact irrelevant to the example. The Christian knows we are all in need of contrition, and like the prodigal’s father, we rejoice at the return of the wayward, we celebrate right conduct no matter how many trials and errors it took to get a man there. We Christians look at a reformed sinner differently than the irreligious; we glorify the “reformed” part, others (ensnared by their own tangled consciences) fixate on the “sinner” part.

        You wouldn’t know this looking from the outside in. I’m glad to give you a glimpse of the truth. “Christian conservatives” are unfathomable to the MSM, and blanks are conjured to be filled in as needed by their reductionist ideology. This fill-in wisdom trickles down to you in the idea that seeing beyond a reformed alcoholic’s misdeeds amounts to a celebration of alcoholism. And media elites scratch their heads when voters defy their tautological expectations.

        So yeah, Christian conservatives have advanced well beyond the pat formulae of lamestream know-it-alls. And by the way, unlike the spiritual dullards on the other side of the aisle, we don’t seek our messiah in the precincts of the Chicago political machine, and we don’t alter our judgment just because a man’s complection matches our wish-fulfillment. That hole in our souls has been stopped up by the real deal, so we don’t look for saviors among imperfect pols. Unlike some 69,456,897 other people I know.

        We “put not [our] trust in princes, in the children of men in whom there is no salvation.” We elect a public servant to do our bidding effectively and efficiently. We don’t expect or even look for perfection. We interview applicants with the best chance of performing non-catastrophically. When an entire political disposition is defined by its spiritual hunger, it’s no wonder they misinterpret the rationality of the already satisfied.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 4:05 pm uh

        The one all-important consideration, which you miss in your usual self-satisfied gushing, is that Gingrich is the most vicious Israel-first war-monger since the neocon extravaganza.

        You want open war on Iran (WarTard says it’s already begun) by proxy for the Jewish state? Well, when and if it comes to pass, you can look back on this comment of yours and reflect that at least you had it right — Gingrich the snide elf-man was the alpha candidate, and you called it!

        “Major powers going broke is historically a war creating environment.

        With Occupy Wall Street protests everywhere, small but worrying to the Western oligarchy, and Europe and the US teetering on the brink of bankruptcy, the scariest part is that total wars are handy ways to wipe financial slates clean, clear the streets of ‘unpatriotic’ long hairs and grab the resources you need to fund the extravagant life styles people in the West have grown used to. If this war does happen, that’ll be pretty much confirmation that the Western oligarchy has run out of ideas on how to solve its insolvency and bankruptcy problem.”

        Mmmmm, more trucks, Wal-Marts and cheap chalupas!!! Can’t WAIT for New the Alpha to save us from the Democunts.

        “It is the most potent force in politics, still seeking a leader to articulate its demands with consistency.”

        You ignore Paul with all the aplomb of a Hannity. *GOLF CLAP*

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 8:31 pm attractionreaction

        Correct, but I can put it more plainly: psychopaths foment wars to give themselves an excuse to suspend the rule of law. Everything else that is said about the “reason(s)” for each war are what magicians call “misdirection.”

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 10:03 pm King A

        Your xylophone needs more than one note on it, brother. Israel? Wow, who gives a shit? I mean, so much of a shit that you induce a bowel-straining bathroom aneurysm? It’s just a country. Jews are just people. I don’t share your fixation.

        I ignore Paul because he isn’t selling to Republicans, and we are quite specifically deciding the Republican nomination. He has so far imported his support in open primaries, and his ceiling in the general is 30%. I appreciate his sprinkles of wisdom all over my party’s nominating process despite the occasional lapse into cloud cuckoo land. I even appreciate those lapses in that they make a contrasting point, and in their contrast test and inform us.

        Ron Paul is amped-up complaint rock when we’re trying to put together a symphony. He has the tea party pekoe in him, just like all of the other candidates to greater and lesser degrees, but not enough to overcome the bitterness of his lemons. Nor does the 76-year-old have the stuff to lead a rambunctious-by-definition, inchoate and organic political movement.

        Further, electoral success requires a champion to interpret the Tea Party’s grievances into something palatable to the middle of the electorate. Paul’s shrill salesmanship excites bored college kids but does nothing for Republicans per se. And this happens to be an election year when we can’t afford to have a “extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice!” Goldwater-style megafail that plants the seeds for sustained future successes. The republic won’t survive to the harvest.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:31 pm Student

        not one substantive criticism of Ron Paul. not one. the same tired and transparent canards: “hes nuts/cuckoo/radical”..

        yeah, ending the federal reserve is nuts, i mean, its great to have a cabal of private banks print and loan your country its own money at a usurious rate of interest.

        wars of aggression, bases abroad. these are all good things, right? cuz war makes (certain people) money. hey, if youre part of that speculative banking or niche MIC elite, fair play. but if you’re anywhere else in the 99% i pity you.

        and israel matters because its a lit stick of dynamite in the powder keg that is the middle east. it is the root of most of the problems there. and it was placed there by the US. that shit comes back as blowback, quoting the motives of OBL and pretty much ever terrorist who makes you guys tremble in fear.

        PS, i like political executive positions (esp in the treasury) to be filled by goldman sachs alumni. it helps expedite the bernankification process. ron pauls a radical all right… imagine how different things would be if he was at the helm…

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 2:17 am uh

        “It’s just a country. Jews are just people. I don’t share your fixation.” — King A

        “Serbia? It’s just a country. Serbians are just a people. I don’t share your fixation, Conrad.” — Ferdinand of Austria

        “Wow, who gives a shit?”

        If you can’t hear the great hum emanating from behind the doors of the Knesset as Israeli politicians collectively rub their scaly hands in anticipation of a Gingrich Presidency, you’re fucking deaf, bro.

        “Nor does the 76-year-old have the stuff to lead a rambunctious-by-definition, inchoate and organic political movement.”

        That is to overdraw the nature of those in the so-called Tea Party movement. If they won’t take to Paul, it isn’t because Paul lacks fire, or the supporters are more dynamic — it’s because they are overstuffed with HFCS frankenfoods and On Demand talmudvision.

        “And this happens to be an election year when we can’t afford”

        We can sooner afford another Democratic Presidency than that of a goyish neocon war-monger. I don’t know how much you think we can or ought to be spending on foreign engagements worthless to all but our Jewish riders, but you have obviously not been sated by the ongoing expenditures in Iraq and Afghanistan-Pakistan. You seem to share the blindness, perhaps also the bloodthirstiness, of “your” party.

        Have news for you: your party isn’t corrupted by the Ron Paul sideshow — it was already corrupt and aims to work off its corruption upon other peoples in proxy war for another nation / alien elite permeating public & private institutions in our nation, which is now not even separable from their motives and ideology.

        There’s the real choice, your smokescreen gongorism aside:

        – A Republican party bound up with Jewish interests that would visit its hatred, servility and greed upon Muslim peoples, while maintaining the established anti-white laws, policies, and public attitudes, doing nothing to reverse the loss of habitat wrought by adverse demographic engineering

        – A Democratic party bound up with Jewish interests that would visit more of all that faster and more ruthlessly upon whites of all classes while making token gestures of withdrawal from the eastern theaters and giving Israel a slap on the wrist for its scatter-shot efforts to ignite the powder keg

        You are out of your league here. I understand what you’re saying about Gingrich and Paul, and strictly within the context of party politics you aren’t incorrect — but trying to isolate Gingrich as good for anyone but your class, I suppose, is an exercise in mockery of everyone else who stands to lose by the possible if not probable course of his presidency, namely Palestinians, Iranians, and the Americans who will be forced to “serve” evermore against those who “hate us for our freedoms” for those who work systematically, behind and in front of the scenes, to erode them completely.

        You force me to suspect that you are, or were married to a Jew, or have half-breed children. Some such compromising factor. Or you go to dinner with them and have a soft spot, that’s common with very serious Republicans. Precisely how “your” party got into bed with them in the first place. Let me guess — you know many “Constitution-loving, gun-toting Jews”?

        Mind, I never said Paul is a viable candidate. He is the best candidate, for sure, but all the negative traction surrounding him, and the fact that voters are easily-swayed retards like all masses, ensures a “megafail” — against other Republicans. Against Obama, I would stake my life on a megawin. But he is not allowed to go that far. Too many invested interests among “your” party. I guess “cutting all foreign aid” — OF WHICH ISRAEL RECEIVES THE MOST, YEAR AFTER YEAR — doesn’t affect the “just people” Jews and “just a nation” Israel. Nah. No reason to throw money at Fox News to bury what success Ron Paul has had so the public isn’t reminded of that.

        God, what a tool you are. You think anyone is fooled by your fancy wording? Go write for the Huffington Post you shill.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 9:39 am Redleg

        Why yes. Ending the federal reserve is nuts. There’s no need for the tongue-in-cheek mockery. We cannot go back to the gold standard. There is more to a country’s wealth than material resources.

        Glossing over Ron Paul’s quackery is just as much a canard as the accusations of quackery his enemies bring forth. It’s whats kept libertarians on the fringe since the goddamn pleistocene.

        It is wiser to acknowledge his eccentricity, and present it as the virtue it is. To have someone unafraid of ridicule, on the national stage, offering unusual ideas to solve our problems, is wonderful. If nothing else it forces the media to adjust the tightness of its vast, yawning apparatus (its sphincter).

        It is NOT productive to go on tirades about libertarian canards, such as cabals of wicked judean bankers, a vampiric israel, and currency manipulation. Have some political sense. Focus on Paul and what he and his thoughts can do in the moment. If he manages to highlight currency manipulation on the cultural/political stage, then soon enough your bogeymen will be put in the spotlight.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 5:24 pm King A

        The Paul candidacy is an opportunity for people like student and uh to vent their spleen about matters having little to do with what kind of president Paul would actually be. They find it freshly shocking with the dawn of each day that people like me do not share the alarmism of people like them. So they sound the alarm in greater and greater terms until words and noises eventually fail them.

        Thinking Israel and warmongering neocons are the root of all evil might even accidentally be true. I don’t care. I don’t ascribe the difficulties of life and country to dark forces out there in the ether sending me where they will. I take charge of the challenges before me and accept responsibility for my lot in life, good or bad, difficult or easy. That is the prerequisite of independence. That is the mark of a man. If the Jews make my life difficult, I take my issue directly to the Jews and remove the difficulty from my life. I don’t bitch about their omnipotent influence and ascribe all manner of general evil to their devices: that is the excuse-making of losers for their loserdom. What can I say? I don’t get pushed around by anybody much, and certainly not by the Elders of Zion. Your fascination with Hebes make you dependent on them.

        I wouldn’t mind a President Paul. His very respect for the constitution he so loves would restrain whatever excesses he seems to promise, excesses which in their exaggeration are animating the paranoias of both the pro-Paul and anti-Paul constituencies of the Republican Party. Meh, I say in my Yiddish accent. My reaction to him is a shrug. He neither scares nor inspires me. But this very indifference is an affront to people so invested in their internet-inspired hobbyhorses that they spontaneously upchuck Pauline propaganda at the mention of his name.

        As a matter a fact I am a Jew — a supra-Jew of the New Israel and member of the Mystical Body of Jesus, the Χριστός or מָשִׁיחַ for whom Jews had been waiting since the expulsion of Adam. The baptism and confirmation of my deliberately chosen Jewishness has nothing to do with my uninterest in kikespiracy theories. I just find them, and the people who draw so much energy from them, boring, exhausting, phony, and in thrall to personal problems I can only pity from this distance.

        I tried to supply a dispassionate explanation for why Paul has not caught fire (nor will not catch fire) with the GOP. Student and uh have competing explanations that are idiosyncratic to their politics, which simply do not interest me.

        JEWT GINGRICH 2012 and L’CHAIM

        LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2012 at 1:58 pm uh

        “As a matter a fact I am a Jew ”

        GLAD WE CLEARED THAT UP

        LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 6:13 pm (r)Evoluzione

      Married 3x = preselection. And, his wives progressively got better looking (2-3-4, at best, but still improvements.) Women see his hypergamy and see themselves. That’s “passion.”

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 8:18 pm whiskey

        Newt is fat, old, White, and ugly. Once Obama Mr. Dreamboat and the media is done with him, he’s toast among vote-switching female voters (the vast amount of White female professionals). White female Republican voters are a poor predictor of the women’s vote. In 2008, Married Women only went for McCain by 3 percentage points. Unmarried went 70-29.

        You can’t fix old. You can’t fix fat (not enough time). You can’t fix ugly. You can’t fix not-loved-by-the-media as a living God. So, no Newt loses about 80% of the up-for-grabs White female professionals who belonging really to neither party nor having built-in economic incentives switch on the game of who is more muy Alpha. Newt loses THAT comparison to Obama by a landslide, already 56% of the population hates hates hates him. Romney definitely needs to hire SOMEONE to get more aggressively Alpha for sure though. He at least looks the part, and is rich. That counts for a lot.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 4:07 pm uh

        Seconded. The South Carolina vote will not be replicated in Florida.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 10:10 pm King A

        Not replicated. But Gingrich will win it, and it is a winner-take-all state. The real question is what happens during the debateless February desert between Florida and Super Tuesday. If the third Gingrich surge has something more to it than rhetoric, he will prove or disprove it then.

        Either way, at least SC has required the better man to earn his place in the final round, where Mitt or Newt will have to withstand a billion dollars worth of forthcoming sewage.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 2:36 am uh

        “But Gingrich will win it, and it is a winner-take-all state.”

        I am also of the opinion that he could ride the SC wave over FL. I don’t want it to happen, but it certainly might. Suppose we’ll see what happens at the debate tomorrow night. Kwans were so awed by his haughty performance last time — I admit that his forceful attitude is pretty cool, as it would be from anyone — that they should be found hanging on his every word this time. I hope he doesn’t embarrass himself by playing to audience expectation, like an encore performance, but that might be the ticket.

        “The real question is what happens during the debateless February desert between Florida and Super Tuesday.”

        Well, as it is a wave, we might expect it to subside — but I imagine he’ll have received many millions more in donations by then, so sheer finance might somehow be the deciding factor, however that pans out. I’m skeptical, as I suppose everyone else but the candidates is, that all the ads make an appreciable difference; obviously ten minutes of a stacked debate had far greater effect than advertisement blanketing.

        “Either way, at least SC has required the better man to earn his place in the final round, where Mitt or Newt will have to withstand a billion dollars worth of forthcoming sewage.”

        The better man is Mitt Romney, but I cede the point.

        Oh by the way buddy, a Jewish-Israeli couple, the Adelsons of Florida, have just become the largest contributors to a Gingrich super PAC. Some highlights from this “just a people”, “just a nation” duo:

        Sheldon and Miriam Adelson are among the richest couples in the world with a fortune Forbes estimated at $23 billion. He owns a global network of hotels and casinos; she is an Israeli-born physician. Their combined gift of $10 million to the super PAC supporting Newt Gingrich is keeping his anti-Romney message on TV in Florida.

        In 1995, friends say Adelson and then-House Speaker Gingrich first bonded over their shared view of Israel. Adelson was asking Congress to move the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem — a move considered so inflammatory to Arabs. Three presidents have called the move harmful for peace, but it’s the first thing Gingrich would do as president. “There will be an executive order about two hours after the inaugural address. We will send the Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem as of that day,” he once said.

        Gingrich has also played down the Palestinian claim to statehood by dismissing their legitimacy as a people. “We’ve had an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs,” he said on the Jewish Channel. A close Adelson friend told CBS News, “Sheldon loved it.”

        Just a people. Just a nation. Just like everyone else. King A doesn’t share my fixation. Strangely, these Adelsons do. Stranger yet, so does Newt Gingrich.

        Now, talk your way out of that. I mean talk, argue, downplay, minimize, rationalize — just don’t prance away from it with some overwritten tripe.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 1:05 pm John Norman Howard

        Sheldon & Miriam (and their “just another country/people” ilk) love Newt?

        Cue Claude Rains: “I’m shocked… shocked to learn!”

        uh is right on the money here… too bad he can’t remember to capitalize White(s) in his posts.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 10:56 pm King A

        whiskey wrote: “Newt is fat, old, White, and ugly. Once Obama Mr. Dreamboat and the media is done with him, he’s toast among vote-switching female voters.”

        I don’t necessarily disagree. But you’re only considering at best a third of a man in full, much as haters think “old, fat, and ugly” is more relevant than game. Yes, he needs the space to demonstrate his virtue, which is why Gingrich is a broken record about “challenging Obama to seven three-hour Lincoln-Douglas style debates.” He knows that a direct message is crucial to his (or any Republican’s) chances with the electorate. If the media succeeds in defining the GOP nominee superficially as you do above, then yeah, either of them are toast. The fat professor is just as aesthetically unappealing as “the little man on the wedding cake” Romney can be ovary-shriveling, depending on how much alpha light is allowed through the media fillers.

        Which was my whole point about Gingrich. He makes the most out of a small window, he lets more light through the tiny aperture made available to Republicans in the veil between candidate and electorate, constructed by resentful media apparatchiks. Romney’s virtues are plain on his face; Gingrich depends on forcing an opportunity to close the sale. Given that opportunity? It’s as good as done, and I don’t care if the mark is a militant crew-cut lesbo or a God-fearing cornfed farmboy. He is a killer closer.

        Romney is fine, right up to the moment of the sale, when the girl looks into his too-perfect Mormon eyes, and gets weirded out.

        Now, as with Reagan’s end-around the media — in speeches, in his actor’s charisma, in the presidential optics invented by his adviser Mike Deaver — this election depends on the direct appeal to the voter, outside of media distortion. The old-guard influence is moribund, rapidly enervating, and consigned to death soon. The only question is, how soon?

        Hence the last reason for my enthusiasm for The Speaker. Gingrich is taking the fight right at the motherfuckers in the press who have pissed their leftist urine all over our politics since Edward R. Murrow’s self-righteous crusade against Joe McCarthy. They have made it impossible to articulate the complicated case against the entitlement state, except in the most rhetorically gifted cases, such as Reagan and Gingrich. If they give Newt the slightest gap, he will drive a big goddamn semi rumbling straight through it (like the beginning of this clip, the poor bastard). If.

        So this election is not just about righting the course of the country. It is about a fight to the death against the very apparatchiks who have made it impossible to right the course of the country for nearly three generations. The media have to be airtight to go out in glory, to get their chump over the hump one last time. But unlike Gingrich, they can’t mess up more than once. They only have to falter in one instance, and the speaker will exploit it into victory.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 2:47 am uh

        “Which was my whole point about Gingrich. He makes the most out of a small window, he lets more light through the tiny aperture made available to Republicans in the veil between candidate and electorate, constructed by resentful media apparatchiks. Romney’s virtues are plain on his face; Gingrich depends on forcing an opportunity to close the sale. Given that opportunity? It’s as good as done, and I don’t care if the mark is a militant crew-cut lesbo or a God-fearing cornfed farmboy. He is a killer closer.

        Romney is fine, right up to the moment of the sale, when the girl looks into his too-perfect Mormon eyes, and gets weirded out.”

        lozozoozzz

        well pal, you certainly have their psychology nailed, i grant you that …

        ” It is about a fight to the death against the very apparatchiks who have made it impossible to right the course of the country for nearly three generations.”

        … but otherwise, it seems you woke up yesterday. must i force this pill down your throat, or have stronger minds than mine tried and failed, as i suspect? some things are just too bitter to swallow i suppose. so wot is it, jewish wife? kids? mess-mates? professor at uni? don’t tell me you ❤ mises & rothbard like that amateur GBFM!!

        LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 1:53 pm Mats

      “could make you believe that red is blue and blue is red” because he conveyed his message with such “passion.”

      Pure alphaness.

      This is why women should never be allowed to vote. They are easily wooed.

      LikeLike


  23. on January 24, 2012 at 4:34 pm Paria-Antikoerper

    This blog literally did save my life and provided ammunition in overcoming my depression, which in large part was due to the anti-male programming I’ve received since a child.

    According to American society, If you’re male you’re: an ugly piece of shit, you are mentally/morally/physically inferior to women, women are at the very least half-gay and as far as civilization goes you’re an obsolete genetic aberration that shall soon be overcome by the NEW GRRRL ORDER surpassing men in college degrees, pay, etc.

    When you have droves of men fed the idea that they are worthless pieces of shit by women, teachers, mass media, culture etc. since they were born it’s should come to no surprise that men are killing themselves at 5x the rate of women, believing themselves to be the problem. Society doesn’t care — men need to educate themselves about these issues.

    My friends already know of the place through word of mouth but I was thinking of also putting up links to the site in restrooms around campus. I’m not so sure about spreading the knowledge to anyone though, and not without Heartiste’s sanction. I usually feel someone out then let them know about it if it seems they are open enough psychologically to profit from it ((suicidal, depressed beta-ness, been screwed over recently, know something is completely fucked up in this so-called culture of ours but can’t pinpoint exactly why))

    LikeLike


    • on January 24, 2012 at 6:37 pm uh

      I would refrain from bruiting our sanctuary about too widely. Remember, some of the nastiest hackers are die-hard leftists — all hacking carries it with some leftist rhetoric — and if such as Anonymous can bypass sophisticated safeguards, pulling the plug on the Chateau would be to them like reaching through a wet paper bag.

      Despite their comfort with the feminist yoke and lash, beta males still use men’s bathrooms, and you had better believe that the more committed will report to their wimmin handlers or do something truly silly like make a documentary about Game, or R himself. Then a feminist professor goes on a little crusade by passing heartiste.wordpress.com to the SPLC and so on for “hate speech”. Has probably already happened, but the point is, a blog is a fragile thing and we oughtn’t expose it to the widest possible audience.

      LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 7:50 pm Mr. C

        All the more reason why Heartiste should write a book !

        I would buy two copies.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 11:10 am Ben

        I’d buy 10. No kidding. I’d hide one in each school library across my state.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 10:47 pm n/a

        uh,

        I wouldn’t worry too much about CH getting hacked.

        BTW. Have you written fiction or poetry?

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 4:14 pm uh

        nah, why?

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 4:46 pm n/a

        You have a nice animating hatred and I’d like to see some of that in our otherwise dead fiction.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 6:46 pm uh

        Thank you. Unhappily, it comes out only in reactionary comments like the above. My rare attempts to write tout seul have been humbling failures. Despite that I am full of good ideas for fictional pieces; I just lack the strength of mind to see them out.

        In lieu of that, let me recommend my friend Mikulas Koly’s book Men, Art, War for some crypto-right fiction.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 9:55 pm John Norman Howard

        If it’s animated fiction you’ll be wanting, check out the works of Harold Covington… especially The Brigade, but all of his Northwest Republic novels are worthy reads.

        LikeLike


      • on January 24, 2012 at 11:52 pm Paria-Antikoerper

        All good points. That was basically my reasoning as well.

        Feeling out friends and close acquaintances has already been 100% successful in how they receive this site. I even had a buddy thank me just a week later telling me he already got 3 dates from applying basic principles of game on some customers at his barista job. Pushing our luck would be foolish; there’s obviously a reason this resonates so well with more and more men out there.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 1:27 am Matador

        Agreed.
        It helps that I’m a selfish bastard, and this blog is too precious to give away for free.

        The sacred url should only be given to desperate cases, like someone mentioned above.

        And even if one plays the good samaritan, there is no guarantee of results. It takes a full month of intense reading to visualize the red pill, and another month to swallow it.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 2:41 am Anonymous

        I’m not trying to be contrarian, but the most of the hackers I communicate with would be infuriated if you called them leftists. Many of them already know game pretty well and just see it as another form of social engineering.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 9:27 am Redleg

        Regarding Anonymous, make no mistake; 4chan has a mysanthropic, misogynistic streak wider than the Atlantic Ocean. The terms alpha and beta are creeping up on 4chan’s /b/ more and more.

        The odds of them mounting a DDOS attack on CH is low.

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 4:18 pm uh

        Oh, that’s good news. I don’t keep up with those people, so my concept of “hackers” comes from early “smash the system!” types. It’s all technical sorcery to me.

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 9:29 am Redleg

        I put on my wizard hat and robe-

        LikeLike


      • on January 26, 2012 at 10:26 pm H

        I love seeing /b/ mentioned here. I have always considered them to be unintentionally a part of the “manosphere”

        LikeLike


      • on January 25, 2012 at 9:15 pm DarkByke

        Avoiceformen.com – we are way ahead of you there dude.

        LikeLike


  24. on January 24, 2012 at 6:15 pm Dan Fletcher

    Haven’t turned anyone onto this blog yet. I have toyed with the idea but I get the feeling most would be repulsed.

    Not everyone can be saved.

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 11:11 am Ben

      Fuck ’em.

      LikeLike


  25. on January 24, 2012 at 7:00 pm Anonymous

    The Citizen Renegade and Heartise blogs helped save my bacon.

    The wisdom and informative analysis contained within helped me realise that my hot yet unstable girlfriend was not marriage material and not capable of dealing with the demands of having kids; which she wanted.

    After she threw an epic shit test at me and then tried to break up with me; partly by getting me to break up with her (via the shit test) I saw the writing on the wall and despite making up with her that evening; I dumped her the following night and walked away never to look back.

    Had I stayed, Iooking back now, I was setting myself up for a world of angst, worry and stress. Not worth it, no matter how “hot” she was.

    Thank you and all those Commentators; you helped me wake up and see the light.

    LikeLike


  26. on January 24, 2012 at 7:24 pm ow

    Men are being told in so many implicit words that all they are is what a woman thinks of them and thtat they should kill themselves for love. Don’t kill yourself for love. Be a killer.

    LikeLike


  27. on January 24, 2012 at 7:28 pm ow

    The terrorists would have won by now? Let them eat cocaine.

    LikeLike


  28. on January 24, 2012 at 7:29 pm Asad

    CFP Speak right there.

    LikeLike


  29. on January 24, 2012 at 7:48 pm spandrell

    Certainly saved mine.

    Cheers.

    LikeLike


  30. on January 25, 2012 at 12:37 am Harland

    Yeah. Same thing happened to me when I discovered alt.seduction.fast in 1999. Changed my life, it did, and for the better.

    LikeLike


  31. on January 25, 2012 at 1:13 am soupgamespace

    Politicians are the ultimate gamers.

    LikeLike


  32. on January 25, 2012 at 4:17 am oDENKIRK

    I am a bespectacled nerd no more and am currently drowning in pussy because of having found the Chateau 9 months ago in a moment of omega frustration.

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 11:11 am Ben

      Wup, wup!!

      LikeLike


  33. on January 25, 2012 at 11:15 am John Matthewson

    Can the truth be evil?

    LikeLike


    • on January 25, 2012 at 11:35 am John Norman Howard

      Only to the truly evil.

      LikeLike


  34. on January 25, 2012 at 9:13 pm DarkByke

    Feminists blogs try to murder men…. actually…

    LikeLike


  35. on January 27, 2012 at 3:38 am nah

    Saw the latest comments regarding the current political race…so I thought I’d chime in with my devalued $0.02.

    America love happy endings…Hollywood ending, as it were. The underdog overcoming all obstacles to triumph in the end. This is known.We also know who produces this opium for the masses, (Google : who runs hollywood)

    The US is broke. Has been for a long time actually. False flag attacks and a complicit media ready and willing to support their elite comrades in drawing trusting (naive)? Americans ins into bankrupting wars have done a number on this new country. (Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler had it right. So did Patton.)

    The RP revolution is trying desperately to purge the anti-Stalinist Trotskyites that jumped ship from the marxist democrat party after the fall of the Cold War. They became pro-life, pro-war, anti-immigrant fascists and joined the Republican party. This has proven to be a problem. But first some history,

    The first two “central banks” of America were abolished because the people actually paid attention to their government, and cared about these things. The third central bank of the United States is being phased out. The bankers are ready to make their move towards what they’ve desired all along. One world currency, and with that, comes government.

    Europe is in shambles. Greeks are rioting because of the austerity cuts. But here’s the twist.

    America is going to vote in an “austerity” president. That’s where Ron Paul comes in.

    The stupid will swallow all the un-electable crap that the media spews forth because that’s what they’ve been trained to do. (It’s called ‘programming, dontchaknow) But that’s because they have to appear to be against him. Otherwise they might be blamed for the hardship that will follow a return to sound money. Weaning millions off the government teat (read:other peoples work…) It ain’t gonna be pretty…for a while.

    There’s a reason all the other zio-candidates are so un-appealing. This has to look like a Revolution, after all.

    So prepare. Big changes coming. The world is not going to end in 2012. But the world – as we know it – just might.

    And just think, after we stop “intervening” israel, thatrabid dog of a nation that needs to be put down before they exercise their “Samson Option” (google it)…well they’ll be home free to murder anyone they want without our interference. That’s what zionism is about anyways, right?

    Man, if I cared enough, I could do some educating on this topic…but the thing is…you can’t teach people who don’t want to learn.

    LikeLike


  36. on January 27, 2012 at 7:03 am Charlesz Martel

    I hope this comment gets read, it’s a little late for new comments.
    did you see this article from Mark Steyn?

    http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/ship-336602-titanic-concordia.html

    It’s about the Italian Cruise ship disaster, and the credo of “Women and children first”.

    The comments are eye-opening. Essentially, I think that a LOT of men are waking up to the true purpose of present-day Western Civilization; which is to transfer wealth (created by White Men) to non-whites and females.

    N.B.: To a certain generation of Englishmen, the BIrkenhead disaster was drilled into them as the epitome of proper English conduct in a disaster. (All women lived, almost all men died). Older Englishmen will tell you that as infants, they often had, above their cribs, an illustration of the Birkenhead. This was so the young male infant would be indoctrinated into “proper English values”.

    The time for a revolution is fast approaching. More and more people are getting that the current social system is fundamentally unsustainable.

    If you can find it, read George Gilder’s “Sexual Suicide” (published circa 1971, at the dawn of the current go-around with the latest version of Women’s LIb hysteria). He predicted that as women gained economic power, the men would simply leave their roles as fathers and protectors.Gilder argued that the total ignoring of women’s sexual power over men in feminist arguments, which saw power only in male pecuniary terms, was fundamentally dishonest in terms of discussing relations between the genders. He was right, of course- hence, game.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Don’t Help The Leftoid M…
    gkruz on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
    Thor on NPC Culture, In One Meme
    P.K. Griswold on Don’t Help The Leftoid M…
    stg58animalmother on Don’t Help The Leftoid M…
    pupton1974 on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
    Ironsides on NPC Culture, In One Meme
    mendo on Don’t Help The Leftoid M…
    SteveRogers42 on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • Red Tsunami?
    • The Three Abrahamic Religions, Abbreviated
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • NPC Culture, In One Meme
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: