Street game is widely believed to be the hardest game to master (although lately it’s been pretty good to me). Women are on the move, trying to get somewhere, often irritated by the day’s insults and lost in their thoughts. Striding aggressively in heels and pencil skirts, the sight of the urban careerist chick motoring to her paper pushing job intimidates a lot of men. So guys who have effective pickup openers for street game are worth heeding. In that vein, I’ve been thinking about the advantages of direct and indirect street game.
RooshV is the most well-known proponent of indirect day game. The crux of his early game is what he calls “the ramble”. You make a seemingly innocuous, nonsexual and open-ended comment to a girl and use that as a springboard to draw her into deeper conversation, eventually terminating in a number close. (It’ll be next to impossible to pull a chick for sex in the middle of the day during her lunchtime stroll.)
Full disclosure: I have used Roosh’s “pet shop” opener on chicks walking around outside, and I have followed up with his “When I was in X…” big bait hook, with positive results. His style of street game suits my temperament. So my opinion here is apt to be biased. Nevertheless, I try to keep an open mind about different schools of game, the most notable being the direct daytime approach. A good example of direct street game was offered by one of his commenters “Richie”.
The indirect approach (pet shop opener, ask directions) kills me. I find the inane ramblings excruciating and therefore I never want to approach.
The direct approach is equally ridiculous. If a girl came running up to me and told me she saw me and have to come over to tell me how hot I’d was I think she was desperate and slightly unhinged. No thanks. I want to come across a smooth motherfucker not a love struck teenager. It’s also awkward and puts too much pressure on both parties to say something to make the situation less embarrasing.I have found a good balance which is something inbetween the two.
1. Walk ahead of your target or cross the road then back over again so you approach from an angle.
2. Glance back towards her as if looking for something.
3. Catch her eye and do a FAKE double take
4. Still walking say “You have an interesting face”
her “thanks”…
“where you from”…
(and take it away for as long as possible before number close)This process feels more natural, impulsive and shows you are interested in her right from the outset so asking for her number doesnt feel ridiculous after you have just asked for directions or some other indirect approach.
This sounds like it has potential, and is especially appealing because of its calculated spontaneity. “You have an interesting face”, spoken from over the shoulder, is direct, but slightly backhanded, because “interesting” can mean a few different things. And it avoids the problem of running up from across a plaza and slobbering over a chick with cloying flattery, a la “You’re really cute and I had to say hi.”
My issue with direct street game boils down to two nagging concerns.
1. I suspect direct game works better for very good-looking men, i.e. men in the top 5-10% of looks. Direct game presents a chick with a radical choice right at the start, and cornering her like that will force her to rely on more instantly perceived judgments of your attractiveness, which means your looks and swagger. I’m having a hard time picturing ugly men pulling off direct game with any consistent success, but I would like to hear about the experiences of men who don’t consider themselves good-looking who run direct street game. I think for the majority of men, the average men, indirect game gives them an opportunity to sidestep the automatic disqualification that hot babes will often stamp on men who hit on them on the sidewalk with direct come-ons.
2. Direct game makes follow-up conversation difficult because it minimizes the opportunity for “the ramble”. This, to me, seems a major handicap of direct street game. “Where is the nearest pet shop?” opens up the conversation for hooking the girl with big bait. It allows you to veer down multiple conversational avenues, and this advantage helps men who are naturally tongue-tied when talking to cute girls (which is most men, really). Direct game, in contrast, closes off these follow-up paths. Many men will be stuck for something to say after dropping the “you have an interesting face” opener, or the “where you from?” follow-up. This goes double if the girl does not react positively and scrunches her face instead.
One more beef I have with direct game, and it’s a minor one, is the type of girl it will be most effective on. Direct game would theoretically work best on impulsive and, yes, dumber girls who better appreciate the stark boldness of an assertive man. Indirect game, with its reliance on wit, situational awareness and verbal dexterity, would work better on less impulsive, smarter girls (i.e. SWPLs) who appreciate these qualities demonstrated in men. Since my experience with direct street game is limited, I’m willing to suspend final judgment on this point. I may in fact be totally off-base about the smart girl-dumb girl dichotomy with respect to direct vs indirect approaches.
Regarding the direct gamer complaint that “girls are gonna know what you’re up to anyhow”, I don’t find this argument persuasive. Girls will know your intentions no matter WHAT type of game you use. In fact, any kind of interaction with a girl is liable to be interpreted as interest in getting her naked. So there’s no good reason to worry about her suspicions. Girls KNOW. The only question that should matter to you is HOW you want girls to know. Most girls like it when a man couches his sexual intentions in plausibly deniable flirtations and rambles.
Instead of giving you the answers you seek, I will open the floor to this question of direct and indirect street game. Readers who have experience with both methods are urged to leave their stories in the comments. Be sure to include pertinent information like your looks, smarts, style and the class of girls you normally hit on. The best contributions will be included in a future post hopefully bringing some much-needed clarity to this eternal pickup community conundrum.

Blah blah blah oppressive patriarchy blah blah blah misogynistic men blah blah blah male privilege blah blah blah sexism blah blah blah glass ceiling blah blah blah old boys network blah blah blah rape culture blah blah blah exploitation of women blah blah blah human trafficking blah blah blah female empowerment blah blah blah you’re just intimidated by strong independent women blah blah blah you probably have a small penis blah blah blah if you’re attracted to women younger than I am then you are a pedophile blah blah blah blah blah blah blah ad absurdum.
LikeLike
Krauser seems to clean up with direct day-game.
LikeLike
One of his friends Justin Wayne cleans up as well.
LikeLike
Indirect-direct daygame is how I term it. What Heartiste says about the problems of full-on direct street approaches hold true and need to be neutralised.
LikeLike
I used to model(seriously), and I can say that not only does direct game work better for good-looking guys, but that its actually the only option. If you’re handsome and you try indirect game, the woman will have the attitude “wow, this guy is that good-looking, but he’s too afraid to ask me for my number. he must be really weak”.
This might be why there are a lot of handsome betas – women set a higher bar for alphaness on them.
LikeLike
“wow, this guy is that good-looking, but he’s too afraid to ask me for my number. he must be really weak”.
this is not indirect game because any kind of game is premised on closing. not getting the close is being a galpal. or a rook w training wheels.
im in the upper percentile as well and I’ve had success with both. the trouble with direct is girls below your level fear -rightly, in many cases- that they will be played or led on. often this results in such girls being timid or preemptively being unreceptive. I’ve often discovered later that such girls are internally head over heels yet doubt itll turn into a relationship and thus shield themselves from potential rejection/slutting.
indirect works best (for high value guys) because you go beyond looks and see them (at least initially and ideally always) as a person w cool style or personality or aura or whatever. further, you come across as high value because- unlike most guys – you tend to realize attractiveness is common and therefore a necessary but not sufficient condition for a LTR. direct works well if you are on the go or want a ONS. but as with anything run & gun the %ages are lower.
i consider the comment in the OP to be more direct than indirect. mentioning face is an obvious subcommunication that you are attracted to looks. to me its a weak play because it is so transparent. its used-car-salesman-game. a better method would be saying “you have an interesting look [or vibe]” which is direct but can refer to clothes, personality etc. it communicates curiosity rather than interest at which point you can qualify for an easy swoop.
LikeLike
There’s truth to this. When I was in high school I had very low confidence and self-esteem despite being good looking and athletic. It was an incongruity that turned women off like you wouldn’t believe. Plus I was needy as hell until I ended up with my gf at the time.
Anyway, if you’re super good looking and go indirect, it just sets off red flags from what I’ve seen. Good looking guys are EXPECTED to be direct, and when they do the women respect them for it and will let them get a way with things a lot of guys simply cannot.
On the other hand, if you’re not good looking, but have irrational confidence, it can really make them do a double-take and give you attention they normally wouldn’t give to someone of poor looks or who may have a shitty job. This is really a case of “fortune favors the bold”. Hell, the very nature of being bold can make ginas tingle, so why not go the direct route all the time? This is more or less what I do nowadays. (except when going direct is socially unacceptable)
LikeLike
“fortune favors the bold”
I have always been of the mindset that audacity, in and of itself, is an independently-evaluative characteristic. In other words, the boldness itself might very well make her ‘gina tingle.
This is why I prefer direct game for most scenarios, and strongly prefer it for scenarios — like day game — where the communication will be substantially time-limited.
LikeLike
zlzozozlzozlz i used 2 models 2 and i know what your talking about when a girl wouldn’t ask me up fornt for my lostsa cockas i would thinks to myself, “wow, this girl is that good-looking, but she’s too afraid to ask me for my lotsas cockas. she must be really weak. no cockas 4 u! lzozlzlzlzozoz! next!”
LikeLike
You make a good point, people expect more from attractive people. Especially when dealing with women.
LikeLike
As a guy in the bottom 50% of the looks and height department, I’ve only had luck with direct game. If I catch her looking at me, I’ll hold that stare, and if she looks again, I just go in and say hi. Maybe it’s that I was born in the 70s and we were really used to TV casanovas doing that, but that’s how I learned it — Vinnie Barbarino on WBK or one of the other “high school” players on TV. Hell, there was a popular character on Friends who would just go right up to women and talk to them — of course he’s in the top 10%.
Differing the straight up SNL PUA community, a key to direct game if you’re not beautiful and model-like is to make the approach seem like she invited you. My best looking guy friends will look for hot women, approach from the side and then appear to turn off their path to talk to a woman just long enough to see if she’s into them — it’s more looks than action here.
If you’re not gorgeous, you can easily tell if a woman is at least curious about your look for whatever reason. Don’t pop around town with Mystery’s feathery hat, but if you have style or a good smile, a solid inverted-pyramid physique or an interesting pair of hipster glasses, women may be curious over it even if your face is a mess of scars and pock marks.
So rather than do what the hot guys can do in the club — coming off at an angle and acting like you’re too busy to talk for long — the average to ugly dude has to basically do the opposite. This requires a ton more confidence, if you ask me, because (a) you’re going up to her while she fully watches it, (b) chances are neither of you are drunk, and (c) even if you’re confident, the first words out of your mouth may come out garbled and messy.
In response to that:
(a) If she’s watching you and gives you a smile, you’re in. Way more in than drunky HB9 at a bar who didn’t notice your stride until the last second. If she’s watching you approach and she looks away and never turns back, feel free to bail.
(b) This is good — she’s not drunk, so she’s even more nervous. Play on that.
(c) Don’t think of any opening lines to say — use your practiced ones. “Hi, I’m Brian.” That’s enough. Honestly — day game is vastly different than night game because your chance of a SNL is much slimmer, and the women aren’t always cock carousel riders like they are in the bar scene.
I think direct day game is MUCH better for the average-to-ugly guy. I’ve said it here before and gotten chastised for it, but I much prefer low maintenance women with jobs than high maintenance club HB9s with attention whoring issues. The women you meet before noon or around noon probably HAVE jobs, and at least got up early enough to be out and about and dressed reasonably well at that hour. Have you seen, during the day, the average bar-going HB9 who is out until 4am? I have, no thanks.
LikeLike
Remembered 3 more direct approaches:
1. Usually use this in bars- walk up to a group of girls and ask, ‘excuse me, how do you girls feel about the prenuptial agreement?’ Always a hit, especially if you make fun of the ones who are against it.
2. Girl walks by in a bar, ‘excuse me, two caronas please.’ (via Hitch: http://bit.ly/QQKnG @ 0:45)
3. Also, “Hi girls, want to buy me a drink? I don’t have any money.” (via The League: http://bit.ly/uwFizQ)
LikeLiked by 1 person
First! – Direct Game = Night Game ; Indirect Game = Day Game.
LikeLike
I dig me some rooshie
Full disclosure:
I use his patented
Six-foot/Six pack Game
Works every time…
LikeLike
Street game is very easy when the girl initiates.
Unfortunately, those girls tend to be on crack and not have much in the way of teeth -but their prices are right.
LikeLike
Yeah, this is good timing. I stumbled through two hot girls i passed by today and would have liked to have remember to do something, anything instead of worrying about false time constraints or if a head to head approach is ok. Even worse is the head to head approach where in the last few feet you realize that the girl is hot and/or she just smiled at you. my genes must be self-selecting extinction. stupid genes.
LikeLike
You may be too hard on your genes, Peckerwood – you may be missing out on short-term sex, but in the long-run, you could end up marrying one of these girls and being out an average of $350,000. Your genes may just have an aversion to Russian Roulette.
LikeLike
When I run bootcamps I make all my clients try direct opener day game about ten to twenty times. It’s not a matter of what works better for whom, but having the skill in your toolkit.
LikeLike
This method began as a purely honest if impulsive act.
I was hurrying to an important business meeting in San Francisco’s financial district and saw this stunning 9 across the street. I took the time to cross the street, got her attention and said,
“Excuse me, I have to get to a meeting that’s going to change my life, but I think you’re gonna change it, too. Let me have your number, I’ll call you later and we’ll see if I’m right.”
Now I was immaculately dressed in an Italian suit and tie, but it must have been the drama and mystery that caused her to smile broadly and quickly write out her number on a card. She handed it over and said, “Good luck!” I smiled to her over my shoulder as I walked off and replied, “I make my own luck.”
I called her two days later and it turned out to be the best three months of my sexual life.
I’ve used the line often since then and it works about half the time.
LikeLike
“Excuse me, I have to get to a meeting that’s going to change my life, but I think you’re gonna change it, too. Let me have your number, I’ll call you later and we’ll see if I’m right.”
Damn.
Most come-on liners require pitch-perfect delivery in exactly the right circumstances. Which is why they usually only work in movies. Or the average guy’s imagination.
But that line may be an exception. Terrific line. Girls have got to love hearing it.
Your 50% success rate — when it didn’t work, do you know why?
LikeLike
As a guy in the bottom 50% of the looks and height department, I’ve only had luck with direct game. If I catch her looking at me, I’ll hold that stare, and if she looks again, I just go in and say hi.
Girls only will look at you if they like you. If they don’t, they don’t. In fact, the Russian word for “to hate” literally means “to not look at”. So if you catch an attractive specimen looking at you, go over and coolly start running your mouth.
LikeLike
I would like to know from the community here a more general question; I know Heartiste has mentioned resources on game before but in general where is the best place to go for the latest pickup techniques? Not talking about the beginner resources but to find out the new changing techniques in the field that is producing results.
I use the fastseduction.com’s forums but are there better places that lays things out for you?
Thanks.
LikeLike
http://www.rsdnation.com/articles/all
Watch every video and article in that archive.
RSD is at the forefront of pickup tech. Tyler still runs bootcamps personally and goes out 7 nights a week. Other PUA communities are either stagnant running 2004 level game or are barely making breakthrus that RSD has already expanded upon long ago.
Skip the RSD forums though, they’re a bunch of socially uncalibrated kids bickering keyboard jockey theory.
And for the love of god stay away from the SoSuave forums. That group (which it looks like is heavily manosphere associated unfortunately) is just a watered down version of pickup by guys scared to really push the envelope. It’s like the McDojos of martial arts.
LikeLike
Thanks.
LikeLike
Direct game is the fastest way to open and promote attraction (especially if you are ugly) then if you take it away and built comfort you’ll be light years ahead of a man who just does indirect game. My two cents.
LikeLike
Am I the only one who thinks street game is suited for older men?
LikeLike
Nope
It’s called
Solicitation
LikeLike
You mean it’s not good for younger men? I’m old and the unhealthiness of too much alcohol consumption and the tedium of “clubs” where serious conversation is impossible definitely turn me off.
Dancing, however, was great, right now I’m too fat!
LikeLike
Good timing. I did well this evening with “day game”. It was dark and cold around 7pm. I could have been lazy and gone home. But the best chances for a man at this time are coffee shops and grocery stores. He should not be lazy and just go home. I went to a large grocery store and loaded up on steaks and veggies.
While at the pasta sauce shelf I saw a 21 year old solid 9 employee about 30 feet away whom I’d approached a few weeks before to ask about how to squeeze grapefruits to test their freshness. I called her by name and motioned for her to come over and she came. She stood close while I said “it’s been at least two weeks since we met”. She answered “No, it’s been 4 weeks” and I apologized to her for letting so much time pass between encounters. I then swept my arm to the pasta sauce and told her that the best stuff from Italy was sold out and she apologized after I said that the store clearly had an incompetent buyer.
Now I’ve got an ugly face with a scar but the height sometimes makes up for it and I work out. I forget what we talked about but I know she comes from a large religious family and it quickly got to me saying “you’re the type of girl I could only dream of marrying”. I don’t know how I got the courage to ask for her number and social media coordinates. She entered her number into my phone and gave me her full, hard to remember name for me to find her on the net. It took an hour and a half later to find her there because of the various spellings I had to try. Right now I’m listening to her favorite singer “Adele”. I’ve never listened to Adele before. But now it’s a must because it’s part of doing one’s homework for the first phone call and first date.
The takeaway from the above: I set this up 4 weeks ago by getting an amusing open going (she would have had to know I didn’t really want to learn how to squeeze grapefruits for freshness) and then only getting her first name and what type of family she was from. I could have and should have tried harder to move forward back then, but the fact is I did not and now she was really comfortable with me. I’d recommend that other guys shoot for an interval of only a week at most, however.
Anyway, on the way out of the store after checkout, another upper middle class 21 year old solid 9 put on a broad smile and said “How have you been? I haven’t seen you in two years”. It turns out she’d been a 17 year old behind the counter at a pizza joint. She’d grown a lot since then and was much better looking. She was with a friend who was equally as attractive.
While talking to this set which had opened me, I was damned nervous about the first girl, an employee of the giant supermarket, seeing me talking to two of her equals near the exit. I understand the concept of “preselection” but I still did not want to be seen having another girl punching her phone number into my phone.
So I asked for the full name so I could find this one on the net as well. I found her and we later had a great chat electronically.
And to think I almost just went home to watch TV on another dark, cold winter night.
Another takeaway here is that you’re not wasting your time just being friendly with all the females around you but not seriously gaming them because the harvest can all come at a later date if you tend to come back to the same neighborhoods.
LikeLike
Fags use direct game all the time.
Deduce from that whatever you want.
LikeLike
Heh… I deduce that you’re a bitter, bitter man. “Fags” is the resort of someone who thinks they’re an alpha, but is really envious of the results that others get doing something.
LikeLike
He means “fags” literally: homosexuals. Queers love fucking like nobody’s business and they just go after it.
That’s why I wonder: why the fuck do they want to get “married.”
Queers have gone downhill, at least American faggots. They used to have an edge, but now most of them look and act like every other mangina doughboy.
They don’t even write good books anymore. So what good are they?
LikeLike
it just means that fags are still biologically male.
LikeLike
Totally off-topic, but …
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Female+Mountie+gets+medical+discharge+with+boss+police+board+rules/6203181/story.html
LikeLike
I haven’t had much experience with day game except for one instance: hot girl with a broken leg. Like a hyena spotting a wounded animal, I pounced on that shit. I think situational openers are key with day game, so direct game seems awkward and out of place.
LikeLike
Day game? Both.
For me the indirect approach is drawn out, but the pounce is smooth and quick.
Example, if you’re going to be near her for a few minutes (bus, , etc.) hold off for a few minutes. No eye glances or talking. Do your own thing. Let her be aware of your presence, but don’t give any cards away. Then you can say just about anything and she’ll be interested to hear it.
But when you’re chatting her up, don’t draw out the ‘can I have your number’ stage or ‘what-do-you-do’ serious stuff. Don’t try and maneuver her towards next steps- when she asks what you do just give her a card. When you say goodbye, hand her a card. Girls don’t pursue, but she will let you know she’s available if she likes you.
That being said, even my indirect game isn’t boring. Example, hottie cash register girl is giving the black guy in front of me his change. As he leaves, she says ‘would you like some chocolate?’
Easy layup. I walk up and say, staring at her eyes, ‘you can’t ask a black guy if he wants chocolate, that’s racist.’ (Bold move since it’s said to a stranger, but doesn’t convey any interest.)
She laughs and says, ‘this one guy said “no, but I’ll take a chocolate kiss”.’
Me, walking away, ‘oh, so you’re black?’ Her: Yeah! (More smiles)
I caught up with her after, gave her my card.
For direct game, I have a number of go-to gags. The one thing in common is that they are funny to me and my friends, even if they don’t go over. I’ll try and remember..
1. For any super hot chick, as she’s walking by I’ll stop her and say, “I will buy you anything.” Usually gets a laugh. If I see her again, I’ll take out my credit card and just hand it to her and say something funny. I walk away and she has to chase after me since she needs to give me my card back.
2. If it’s a group of girls sitting at a table, I’ll grab a menu, walk over and say, ‘can I take your order.’ This works well at night too.
3. If it’s a hot waitress or barkeep in a crowded place, I’ll ask for a piece of paper and a pen. I’ll tear it in half and write a ‘boyfriend application.’
4. Not mine, but I have a friend who opens girls with, “Do you hate your father?” So good.
5. I’m working on a new one right now, my new atom bomb. Basically, I’ll jump up on a chair or table and do pretty much these exact dance moves. Works in casinos, nightclubs, any crowded place:
LikeLike
Wow. 3 things I will start using tomorrow:
1 – Can I take your order
2 – Boyfriend Application
3 – Do you hate your father
All 3 are open-ended
LikeLike
Remembered 3 more direct approaches:
1. Usually use this in bars- walk up to a group of girls and ask, ‘excuse me, how do you girls feel about the prenuptial agreement?’ Always a hit, especially if you make fun of the ones who are against it.
2. Girl walks by in a bar, ‘excuse me, two caronas please.’ (via Hitch: http://bit.ly/QQKnG @ 0:45)
3. Also, “Hi girls, want to buy me a drink? I don’t have any money.” (via The League: http://bit.ly/uwFizQ)
LikeLike
“If I see her again, I’ll take out my credit card and just hand it to her and say something funny. I walk away and she has to chase after me since she needs to give me my card back.”
And what would you do if she DOESN’T chase after you? Just goes on her way with your credit card?
Either you have to chase her, or she’ll just go on a big shopping spree with your card.
LikeLike
well, duh, you don’t give her YOUR credit card, you give her a stolen one.
LikeLike
That’s a bit stupid. Use one of those refillable pre-paid ones if you’re not willing to call in a “stolen” card when they keep it like that. That way you minimize losses- and they can’t tell unless they look REAL close that it’s anything but a regular credit card.
LikeLike
The best Day Street Game is called Walk the Dog Game.
Buy a cute dog.
Walk the dog.
Attract bitches.
Ramble. Drop bait. Close.
Get her number.
Direct and Indirect is pretty stupid when you can do something as awesome as Walk the Dog Game.
The cuter the dog, the better. If you have a little miniature cute girly lap dog, just tell the girl you are watching it for your sister/cousin who is studying abroad.
I agree with Roosh. Street Game is hard to master. So why not bring the best prop of all time? A cute little dog will get you interest and an automatic opener 10/10 times.
LikeLike
I have a friend who brings his dog to the bar. Inevitably, girls come up, start playing with the dog, and say, “He’s so cute!”
What does he say?
“I don’t think he likes you.”
Brilliant.
LikeLike
That is god damn BRILLIANT! Hilarious!
LikeLike
Outstanding.
LikeLike
how about Indirect Direct.
It’s called Subtext
LikeLike
What is it with you people and buying pets? Ever heard of an animal shelter?
I guess this is what you get with people who see animals as props.
LikeLike
Got a pure German Shepherd. He bites pussies like you.
LikeLike
Roosh is a faker..i first had my suspicions when i saw some of his comments he made about some things in south america. Look on youtube for the video ” My response to Bang Iceland criticisms”
Watch this video of him not understanding why Icelandic people are angry because he is calling their women sluts. After all its true! Its like the other day i was explaining to this guy that his daughter was the skankiest slut I’d ever fucked, and he heartily thanked me for the insightful information and bought me a beer! My favorite alpha line from the video…you cant say its because I’m handsome..well maybe a little.. The sad thing is that he doesn’t even know how bad he comes across..when is the last time you heard a guy say “make that sweet love” and not sound like a douche?
[heartiste: i dunno, i think “make that sweet love” sounds kinda funny. it depends on the tone of voice when it’s said.]
LikeLike
I am a big supporter of direct game, but I think it depends on context and depends on mostly using direct game as not a full arsenal, but as a opener and finisher.
Side note, ha, I actually started reading this blog after someone pm’ed me that the author of this blog linked one of my casual postings on Pick-Up-Artist-Forums (regarding direct game openers), but that’s besides the point.
First, direct game is also based on context, how direct you are to me, depends on the environment. In the club environment I feel it works best to be as direct and ‘horny’ as possible, telling a girl she’s sexy as fuck or whatever she’s wearing makes her thighs look incredible, works wonders. I also like the apocalypse opener too. In day time scenarios I tone it down, I like the nice but not too corny approach of simply flattering a woman and catching her off gaurd by saying something like, “Wow, I don’t normally do this, but I had to come and tell you that you’re absolutely gorgeous!” of course it’s only as corny as you feel it is, if you’re confident it’s a game winner. My friend actually got a super-sexy 9/10 weather reporters number with that exact opener.
Secondly, If you boil direct game down to what you NEED to make it work, I think you have to have balance. I use direct game as my opener, stack it up, and then the meat of it is usually more indirect game, and then BAM back to high octane direct game. I find the combo works perfectly and in my case, I have only had great in the moment results using PURELY direct game, but better and more satisfying long lasting results combining the two.
It’s almost like, the direct game I start with shows my intent, plows through any bullshit that I would have rambling and fucking around hoping she likes me, and then my indirect game (dhv, etc.) starts really selling her even more, building even more attraction showing her I’m worth it, and I go back to high octane direct game to finally seal the deal.
When I was still getting used to the high of making out with women pretty soon after I approached them, I started realizing that’s where it stopped because I had nothing else to offer. Often times, I would bring them out to the dance floor, I would start feeling them up and they would be incredibly horny at this point, but then they’d leave and I’d be confused. Sure they wanted to fuck, but I deduced that they didn’t have enough reason to. Fundamentally, It was because my structuring of direct game was purely ONLY direct, and again, I didn’t have enough meet to my game to successfully pull a girl.
As far as looks go, I have been told I’m very attractive, but again, I reason that all men, as long as you’re not deformed, can look good too. If you compare a before and after of me, I used to be scrawny, nerdy and worse of all, weird and awkward. Then I stopped being a vegetarian (not because of pick up, just because I was one for seven years and realized I didn’t care for it much) and gained muscle at a rapid rate in combination to working out, and bought myself contacts and started to dress really nice. I still get shit tests, but far less than when I was smaller and nerdier looking. What I’m saying is, granted you’re confident as fuck and wiling to look like you take care of yourself, you really shouldn’t have any problem, and even when I was nerdier, but became confident, I could pull off direct game, but I was bombarded with a lot more shit tests. Looks are only as big of a deal as you make them.
Anyways, great work you’re doing with this blog, and I love the commentors and reader support here.
LikeLike
“looks, smarts, style and the class of girls you normally hit on”
Alright, here’s my profile:
– Looks: Tallish (6’1), lean/muscular, 7-7.5 face. Average dick.
– Smarts: Einstein is an amateur.
– Style: I’m more successful (and confident) when I’m suited up. I don’t wear ties, more like black or grey shirts under same color suits. I have a dark hair, and I like the tall dark handsome stranger image.
– Class of girls I normally hit on: Busty brunettes.
I know. I’m awesome. And game denialists will attribute my success to my awesomeness. But I was a virgin until the mystery method came out.
I go direct most of the time. My favorite opener (when the target is standing still) is “It’s not really polite to stare at people like that”, even if she wasn’t staring at me.
When they’re walking, it’s tougher, although I’m not intimidated anymore by the busy vibe of careerist urbanites. I usually keep it simple. The last time it happened, I opened like this: “Can I have a second of your time. I saw you here the other day, but I couldn’t blablabla, I don’t want to make the same mistake again. My name is…”
I try to escalate quickly after the usual chit-chat. I think that’s where most guys fail miserably. If she shows the slightest form of an IOI, I don’t hesitate anymore to interrupt her somewhere in the middle of the convo, with something like “You know why I approached you in the first place?… It’s because I knew that I can feel a connection with someone like you. It’s quite a fascinating thing to experience in such an impersonal city. Blablabla”.
My style relies most of the time on bullshitting. I can talk in an emotional way and I try to make the most of it. Not all girls are receptive to that. But thanks to the Chateau, I also found my way to go caveman on alpha cock junkies.
I had enough flakes to be wary of number closes. I now really shoot for the kiss close. That’s why my advice would be: escalate, escalate, escalate.
One of the few instant lays that I had in my career was when I tried a “mad men” routine (I don’t remember the episode nor the characters names). I hit on a chick in a park, I managed to take her for drinks nearby. After maybe 30 minutes, I cut right to the chase: “You know what I want to do now? I want us to leave this place and walk hand in hand until we reach my appartment. The lift is not working so we will have to climb the stairs. As a gentleman, I will go first, and you will follow me. When we arrive, I will open the door, I will let you in. I will firmly shut the door, and I will stare at you deeply in the eyes…”. She said : “And…?”. I said: “Let’s go find out”.
It’s not that difficult, folks.
LikeLike
I have to wonder at what point how much of this stuff is no longer age appropriate. I’m 46, did well in my 20s and 30s, with no knowledge of game but the last six years have been bad. How do you calibrate these methods for someone my age?
I’m sure there are others in my age group with similar concerns. Desirable single women are very rare in our social circles.
I’ve read the books, but Mystery, Strauss and Roosh V are young guys. Who are the older guys with similar insights??
[heartiste: i think strauss and mystery are pushing 40.]
LikeLike
If you are forty and look like you are falling apart, you have no hope, but if you sixty and look like you can beat up two eighteen year olds, not an insuperable problem. Do you surf pretty regularly, go sailing pretty regularly, and climb mountains every now and then? If not, try it.
LikeLike
What success I’ve had is based on my looks, certainly not social skills or charm.
Physical contact and second dates aren’t happening. I’m either too nice or she thinks I’m a player. I’m not a player and don’t aspire to be. I just want a companion with a nice personality and a cute butt.
Either way its not working. And I need a working hypothesis as to why.
I’m starting to think what I read in the books and on these game blogs is giving me a mindset that is incongruous with my age.
LikeLike
Dude, I turn 50 this year. Its not incongruous with your age, except that if you have the paper, don’t have oodles of free time, and don’t have access to a workplace with a lot of hot young chicks (like by working in a restaurant), in the end, paying for it makes more sense than running around clubs. But if you are out and about anyway, why not use these techniques? A chick is behind you on line at the store, and you want to hit on her, so you may as well know how to approach it.
Anyway, a lot of the game techniques transfer over even if you’re paying for it -I’ve had several hookers transfer me over to giving it to me free, and they transfer to relationships, as well. And I date and sleep with as many chicks half my age or less as I do more than half my age. There’s a girl with a tight hot ass that doesn’t turn 21 until July that wants to marry me, so…
LikeLike
That’s encouraging. Not the hooker part, but that a 50 year old who is not famous is nailing 20 year olds.
LikeLike
Lets not rush things here – I ain’t 50 yet!
LikeLike
Heh… Done right, you too can nail 20 year olds… >;-D
LikeLike
Heh…biggest problem I have is that the ones I’m interested in bothering with have a rack-rate of $150-450/hr.
Thinking about it, though… It’s definitely cheaper than either of my exes ended up being. >:-D
LikeLike
Again, let’s remember that the vast majority of mercenary women are not professionals. They can’t be called hookers but they are available for favors if you establish comfort first and discuss their financial situation, etc. Once a much older man gets used to sleeping with women less than half his age, he can leave the money out of the equation and things will happen because she senses his entitlement.
LikeLike
When you are over 40 and targeting younger women, from the late 20s and up (26 is my youngest), I have found that the negs you read about in MM are not necessary, but your game has to be tight. They expect you to be experienced with woman and the ones that hook want to be led my a mature man. They will want to feel that they are learning from you. Being older, more than ever you have to be the prize. In my experience, most of these women have no problem attracting men who want to fuck them, but what they want most of all is to feel that they are special. First you need to impress them that you are special and they are lucky to have met you. You have to have something to offer. Then you qualify them, and if they pass, you reward them and make them feel special. This is what they want, they want a discerning man to find them special for more than their bodies and their youth.
When you’ve got them attracted to the solid oak tree older, wiser man thing, play contrasts. Be bad, wicked, devious, Be spontaneous. At any rate, that is what I do. When you walk into an elevator alone, attack her sexually. Right before the doors open, compose yourself, pull away and lead her out as if nothing ever happened.
I have had the most fun being secretly bad when we are supposed to be the most proper. Try it, they love it.
LikeLike
Im also 46 and have found the drop off in success rates since 40 alarming. I’m a solid 7-8 face, height is ave, fitness/ body/ take care of myself is a 10, well to do, well educated, great smile, dress well, active as can be, etc. But man, even chicks in their mid-30′ s are becoming scarce. Any advice from others in their mid to late 40s?
LikeLike
I’m 53 and have found day game to be useful. The problem is, I’m usually to busy in the day to run game. So I have to schedule it in, which has it’s own set of problems.
Around me (outside Philly) most of the bars and clubs are full of rednecks. There’s nothing more frustrating than walking into a bar with a good f/m ratio and discovering your the only one suited up. Not to kill all your Daisy Mae fantasies, but a lot of the peckerwood women are knocked up by the time they hit 16 and look the worse for it.
However, if I run day game, I can avoid the low-lifes and concentrate on HB’s at coffee shops.
LikeLike
One thing is that as an older man we are absolutely and without fail expected to have higher value and more confidence than a much younger girl. Being tipsy on booze has been one of my downfalls.
Projecting confidence is learn-able skill according to “The Power of Body Language” by Tonya Redman (2007). I know, she’s a woman and there is probably a better male oriented book on the topic.
But a woman is likely more keenly aware of what men do make themselves appear weak such as hunched or shrugging shoulders,weak eye contact, looking down, biting of the lip….I’ll be re reading this to see what she emphasized in this regard.
LikeLike
Are you saying “I’m 46” before sex with someone under 30? That’s your problem right there.
LikeLike
How does one handle the question?? I’m not going to announce it and honesty is my default mode.
Six years ago, when I was 40 I was picked up by hot 23 year old (she overheard me talking smart with her professors) we chatted and when the bar closed she offered me a ride to her house where her friends were meeting. In the car she asked my age and I told her, and received the obligatory “you don’t look 40”. Anyway we got to her driveway and I just assumed her underwear would be making an appearance.But before going in she said “just so you now I’m not going to date you”. The term “shit test” or game was not on my radar at the time. I was visibly shaken and totally fucked up a prime opportunity. Never went inside her house but that sweet hot girl gave me a ride home.
Despondent, I spent the next day searching on the internet for a reason to keep living, and found out about Neil Strauss’ book and it honestly changed my life but I never really had the desire to approach or use routines until now. So I’m hitting it hard as of last week. Its intense, lots more downs than ups.
[heartiste:
“just so you know, I’m not going to date you”
non-game using anti-gamer: “oh, ok.”
result: no sex, no dating.
“just so you know, I’m not going to date you”
game-using pro-gamer: “phew, that’s a relief.”
result: improved odds of sex, *and* of dating her.
hope this helps.]
LikeLike
I handle the question by telling chicks I’m 87. If they say they don’t believe, I smile and say “how come know one believes me. .. I go to the gym.. .I work out…? If they say, “c’mon, you’re not 87”, I say with a smile, “you think I’m lying? I turn 90 in less than three years.” yada yada Maybe then ask them their age, and then DQ them for being too young for you, etc. You get the idea.
Also, dude, you’re only 46. Its not like you’re a 46 year-old chick, which is like 76 in guy years. Plenty of chicks that are half your age are fine with you being 46, just usually not the kind of chicks that are in medical school or something like that.
LikeLike
Good information. I’ll use a variant of that if you don’t mind. 36 and 40 are common upper age limits for 20ish girls that I see on the online dating site “OK Cupid”. But I think with these dating sites, just by being on them is a display of lower value and even the big legged cougars are ridiculously picky.
Regarding direct street game, I think it would be more of a numbers game than indirect. Perhaps if you targeted a girls dorm, where they were all ovulating at the same time it would give a good result.
LikeLike
Three threads:
Option 1) Full-on neg: “What are you, an undertaker or what? I’m not going to drop dead anytime soon. Don’t have to measure my coffin yet.”
Or a counter-stroke: [going closer as if examining her face]: “You seem to have lines under your eyes/next to your mouth etc. Are they something serious?” Especially if there indeed are signs of impending facial doom visible, all the more sweet.
Or Option 2), waxing lyrical: “Like the writer Mika Waltari once wrote that ‘I’m only as old I seem to your eyes… Lady Dorothea’.” Gives a chance to mockingly nickname her as Dorothea, if that’s called for.
To the “you look like my father” (heh): “Your father must be a handsome and well-preserved man then” or “You seem to have a curious thing for your father if you see every man as a reflection of him. Tell me more.”
All cocky and fully confidently smiling of course…
LikeLike
KrauserPUA is very good on day game. Tons of surreptitious micro cam videos of him doing it. He has a sort of blended direct/indirect style.
LikeLike
Krauser isn’t real handsome but he is fit, and fairly tall.
LikeLike
5’11”, 175lb, with a potato head
LikeLike
Those guys may be pushing 40 but I’m betting they have groupies and the approach methods they applied seem foreign to them now. I’m thinking acting classes may be productive – It seems that some of these guys sort of create a character to help suppress beta idiosyncracies and shield their feelings from the barrage of rejections.
LikeLike
I m in d top 5%. Handsome successful and direct. And also n engineer. I use my surrounding to initiate the conversation on what we can both see. And gage her response. If positive, I control d situation, talk some shit like, we should get together sometimes later.then end it abruptly saying I have something pressing to do can I get ur number. But negative vibe, I assume she has a BF and also end without asking for her number. Keeping control in d long run is challenging.
LikeLike
u from the caribbean, mate?
LikeLike
Nope
LikeLike
I had an experience the other day which I wonder how I could have handled or whether there was even any chance.
A girl in my social circle who I know peripherally had performed latin dance in a club.
I ran into her in the elevator after she had changed and was leaving at the same time as me.
Me: “Oh, didn’t recognize you…” —referring to her change of clothes
Her: Oh, last time you saw me I was fat right?
Me: Right, you were huge…and you had flowers.
Her: Laughing…I recognized you from that time you were making that speech, so cool.
Me: That was my avatar… You like performing…
Her: Yes….[I engage her in conversation]
Me: I’m coming out tomorrow, why don’t you come out.
Her: I’m studying….
Me: Wow, so serious, what are you studying
Her: Oh, just some bullshit…an MBA
Me: Ahhhh you don’t need that, look at me, I just have a high school diploma and am on tv
Her; Laughing… I have to …
Me: You’re boring..see you around… kinoed her arm, turned around and walked away.
Thoughts?
LikeLike
It looks to me like you have nothing to learn from me, but with the benefit of hindsight I think that, instead of saying “see you around”, you could have asked for her number.
That’s the only thing that I _think_ you could have done better; and if there is a high probability of “seeing her around”, then even that was not a mistake: probably better to ask her the next time you see her.
LikeLike
Interesting new study from Pew. Women are much more active “pruners” of their Facebook profiles than men: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Privacy-management-on-social-media/Summary-of-findings.aspx
LikeLike
My approach during the day is to typically to be more indirect, more patient, then DHV through lifestyle game. It’s been moderately successful. I get numbers with a fairly good success rate, but that turns into flake-city more often than not. The ones who stay in the fold, it’s python long game.
The few times I’ve used the direct, sexual vibe method, it’s mostly failed, but with one great success that came from being sexual yet mysterious & cryptic. I had her naked by nightfall. Direct game does seem to work better for me when I’m traveling, and thus it must be something in my own head that needs to change.
I would say that I’m in the 7-8 range in looks, but look young for being in my mid-30’s. I’m of average height, but athletic & muscular build. Actually with the looks thing, it seems quite polarized, with a subset of women who think I’m devilishly handsome, and others, not so much.
LikeLike
i only ever do direct game on the streets and in clubs cos i hate having to think of something clever to say
if i see a hot girl walk by i just stop her within 2 seconds and just spit out whatever comes into my head
if she hooks great, if not more fish in the sea
tho i usually approach ard 20-30 girls on a day out so i play the numbers game
ive learned that i can pretty much say anything and pull it off as long as i hold my frame and poker face, and she’ll just play along
they’d usually make an excuse to leave or say that they have a bf, in which case i just ignore and plow on, and it always works
whats more important tho is the vibe or state i get into after approaching a certain number of sets, cos then i really dont give a fuck anymore, and i feel as tho im invincible,but happy and social at the same time
suddenly every set opens and hooks, n everyone is suddenly looking or smiling at me as i walk past them
at this point i feel as tho im on a natural high and all my senses come alive. i never really enjoyed game until i actually felt this for the first time
i get lotsa numbers but most of them are flakes at the moment, so i’m still working on this
i started a year ago but i’ve only been doing this religiously now for the past 6 months every weekend
im asian 5″10 and bald
ive got an athletic build from lotsa training and dancing, and i get lotsa compliments from both guys and girls on the clothes i wear
so taking all that into account i’d say im prolly average on the looks department
LikeLike
Just curious if you’ve noticed a pussy bounce as a result of Linsanity.
LikeLike
lol had to google linsanity
im in london so i doubt many ppl know who he is
and i hardly see any asian guy caucasian girl couples here
tbh i dont rly care about my looks cos i know if i approach enough times i’ll def get laid
so my goal is just to make approaching as easy light hearted and fun as possible
LikeLike
I know he gets a ton of criticism, but I’m telling you that Paul Janka’s bullshit common sense opener of asking for directions kills it for me…
You simply say….”Hey! I’m lost……can you help me out? where is the Verizon Center?” Then she gives you the bullshit answer and then you follow up with more confusion…. like “two blocks down on the left? You sure?” .then she gives you more answers….then you follow up with….some other bullshit.. like “any good bars around there.”
I did it and I was shocked at the level of details girls would give you to work with….
LikeLike
Le Heartiste said: “Regarding the direct gamer complaint that “girls are gonna know what you’re up to anyhow”, I don’t find this argument persuasive. Girls will know your intentions no matter WHAT type of game you use. In fact, any kind of interaction with a girl is liable to be interpreted as interest in getting her naked. So there’s no good reason to worry about her suspicions. Girls KNOW.”
I’ve always wondered about that shit. I mean, the whole “she’s gonna know what you’re up to” complaint about “direct” approaches. Of course she’s going to know, no matter what you say or do she’s going to know or strongly assume that you’re either
a) aiming for sex
b) aiming to steal or somehow con something from her, be that her purse or a few dollars to save the fucking whales or asexual heteroromantics (lolz, as Great Books for Men would say)
c) just being your nutcase self and rambling incoherently to random strangers regardless of their sex or
d) a healthy mix of the previous.
If you go to a girl you don’t know, what else could you possibly have in mind? It’s not like you’re gonna ask for her help carrying your heavy luggage or shopping bags or whatever, is it? It’s not like you’re gonna ask her for some keen insight on latest sports events or important political issues? If you wanted intelligent conversation, you’d get that from another guy. If you wanted help in some physical task like carrying stuff, a man would be more useful. It’s only if you want sex or romance or a mother to your twelve bastard children that a woman becomes the better option to turn to. Sounds pretty harsh, but is it not true? I ask you. I believe everyone, even the girls, know that. They won’t ever believe you have innocent motives in talking to them, unless you look like a fruitcake. Girls aren’t stupid enough to believe you just wanted to talk about her dog or your dog or something absurd like that. She’s gonna know, so just roll with that.
My (very limited) personal experience on direct vs indirect day game:
In the looks side, I’m probably pretty average, not deformed or scarred or with horrible skin, but not sculpted like Brad Pitt or Leo DiCaprio either. Advantage would be being tall, except so is pretty much everyone else in the Nordic countries. In good shape, but not ripped like serious bodybuilder or anything, I don’t stand out massively in this country.
Smarts? Well, yeah, I’ve got a high IQ and I’m not an aspy case, so that helps.
Style? I’d call it business practical, nothing peacocky, just whatever fits what I’m doing, from a suit and tie to a pair of running shorts and a wifebeater if I’m running. I’m not very fashion smart and find myself unable to learn because the perceived stupidity of it hurts my head.
Class of girls I approach I’d say 8s and above (my rationale is that being beta, this stuff is difficult anyway, so why waste time on approaching girls that aren’t all that attractive when I could chase after the real lookers and sometimes enjoy a really good time instead of pointy elbows, as you say…), between roughly 17 and 30 years at most in age, who don’t have the looks and bearing of a complete slut because those just don’t appeal.
Indirect (very indirect) game like that Roosh example of asking about where the pet shop is or something hasn’t worked too well. People around here aren’t fantastically helpful to strangers, so asking something like that is a pretty good chance they’ll just shrug and move on, say they don’t know or in the near best case tell you exactly where the pet shop is and walk away, in which case you’ll have to walk after them and that to me no longer feels very indirect or subtle at all. I can’t get this to work.
And finding someone standing at a red light (Don’t Walk to you norteamericanos, I guess) to ask such a question? I’ve tried that, with expected results. They thought it was really weird to ask such a question in that situation – why aren’t you walking around looking for the place and asking someone who walks by you, instead of asking at a red light. Indirect game doesn’t feel natural here, because people just don’t much talk to strangers about stuff, they just walk on their merry way from point a to b, trying not to get too close to anyone or be otherwise annoyed. Especially in Finland, where a lot of people actively hate it if you get physically closer than a step or two, even in traffic. So, indirect day game feels awkward for me, and the girls don’t react too well to it here.
Direct day game in the sense of “Hi, I’m John Clark” works much better for me. That kind of approach immediately takes away the girl’s option of walking off with a “yeah, I don’t know where the pet shop is” and makes it clear what you’re about, as if she didn’t know it otherwise (she does, but finds it more ballsy when you actually say it). People here are not talkative, and are pretty shy, so even hot girls don’t get people coming up to them during the day and hitting on them all the time so it makes you stand out from every other guy except “foreigners” (meaning African and Arabs, which the girl will either a) love to death or b) avoid like the plague). I don’t have the balls for direct game in the sense of “Let’s fuck.”
My most successful “technique” so far? Just walking by a girl as if to pass her on your way, but allowing your eyes to linger on her for longer than usual before saying what translates pretty much into: “And the day is no longer boring. I’m John.” Now this doesn’t always work, and you’ll get girls that will just walk away and say nothing, like you weren’t there. That’s the North for you. But I find a strong majority does react and feels obligated to at least exchange a couple of awkward words. That’s your chance. I typically do what a lot of game material says not to do, I guess, like openly admit to having a boring day so far and commenting on the girl’s looks. But people here are pretty down to earth and unlikely to believe you were just coming off from JamesBonding and chances are she’s having a boring day at work herself. Looks? People here aren’t eloquent, so if you say something smarter than “your so hot”, that’ll be nice and special for her. I try to be subtle about the looks comments.
On a recent attempt on a very cold day, I told an attractively dressed girl “It’s nice to see someone every once in a while that doesn’t look like they just escaped from an igloo. How come you can stand up on those heels while everyone else has to crawl on all fours?” Got her email after a short discussion, and later, met at a bar for drinks, later ended up having sex, so not bad there. Or before that, on another cold day, walking up to a pretty girl who was obviously cold because she was wearing rather attractive than practical stuff: “Hi, I’m John, come with me if you don’t want to freeze in this damn blizzard. At the corner’s a good coffeeshop with warm drinks. Saves lives.” She laughed in the positively surprised way, but then I spotted her wedding ring and wasn’t surprised by the “maybe some other day” evasion. Exactly the same thing did work on another girl later. She followed me for a cup of coffee, was a little surprised when I didn’t offer to pay, to which I cockily replied “paying for her coffee is the next step after I get knighted by King Carl (of Sweden)”, she took that very well, and we chatted about everything that’s wrong about workdays when it’s cold. Number close, met in a bar, got laid. Could’ve done worse.
Now none of this would probably work in America. Over here, it worked for me because I’m a lot more comfortable with this, rather than making up innocent sounding conversation with an ulterior motive steering the convo along all the time. And even more because in Nordic countries in general people aren’t massively social and talkative, so you can often stand out as brave / alpha by approaching and not being a complete neanderthal (“nice tits”) or fumbling omega (“I just wanted to tell you how beautiful you look”) about it.
And this wall of text probably wasn’t useful, but free speech is a bitch, right.
LikeLike
You look like a handsomer version of the Jesus reproduction that I saw in National Geographic. Seriously though, girls want you to be involved in important shit like saving humanity and whatnot
LikeLike
Problem is that every shmuck in history has used “indirect day game.” It’s sort of the standard pickup throughout the aeons and throughout every culture ever. I see fat guys in banks and supermarkets using this all the time. Women know immediately what’s going on and they size you up same as if you were running direct game.
LikeLike
“looks, smarts, style and the class of girls you normally hit on”
-I’m pretty good looking and I have an athletic build, but at 5-6 I’m a good bit on the short side. I’m usually rocking slacks (no pleats) with a Brooks Brothers slim-cut button down shirt. Or I’m rocking jeans with a Brooks Brothers slim-cut button down shirt. I freaking love those BB shirts. If you have a V-shaped torso, you should always always wear a slim-cut shirt. I will hit on any class of girl so long as she gives me movement. The movement test has never let me down. Oh, and I’m smarter than the average bear. And a reasonably outgoing, jovial fella.
For day-game, I go direct. The end-game with day game is to get the number and so the approach will ultimately end with direct game. Considering the possibility that you might have, in a lot of situations, a very small time window to execute the approach, I think starting with indirect game does little other than communicate that you weren’t ballsy enough to just go with direct game.
I like direct game because of the audacity that goes along with it. To just walk up to a girl look her straight in the face and ask for her number is (a) clearly communicating to the girl that you would like to have sex with her and also (b) communicating to her that you have a sack of balls in your pants. I do try to inject a hint of fabricated nervousness for normalcy appearances (i.e. that I’m a regular fella — not an approach machine).
One observation: there is zero correlation between how smoothly I deliver a line or how witty the line may be and whether she gives me the number. I’ve come to the conclusion that the opening line in a day game is completely irrelevant. An absolutely throwaway line. It does not matter. I’ve gotten numbers after horrible half-stuttered attempts. And i’ve gotten turned down in instances where I delivered it as smoothly and confidently as I am able. I think the reason for this is that the female is caught off-guard by the approach, and so she really isn’t that in tune to what you just said or how you just said it. Again, this is why I don’t think it matters what you say. The extent that she is in the mood for some deep dicking is going to be much more outcome determinative than the amount of wit you displayed in those first 5 seconds.
I should note that the hottest girl I’ve ever had sex with came from a direct-game pickup on L street at about 3pm. She was a 9-1-9 half-black girl. Absolutely banging hot. She had this oversized purse and I asked her if she was storing kittens in there. Or maybe I asked if she had dead people hidden in there. Can’t remember. She had a boyfriend but gave me her number anyway ostensibly because she was new in town and thought I’d be a good hanging-out buddy or something. I had a hunch that I would be able to fuck her. I did in fact later fuck her, as I have already indicated.
Anyway, I think direct is the way to go. I guess that is all for now.
LikeLike
Oh yeah, I’m 32 but I’m told that I look more like 25 (likely attributable to me being short).
LikeLike
totally agree w kidbourbon
plus its a hell of a lot quicker than indirect game so u get to approach more girls
LikeLike
Heartiste,
Could you review Krauser’s book? I’m thinking about getting it but I can’t find any reviews by guys who actually field tested it alot or convinced me otherwise that they are not some random KJ. Considering the price tag I’m reluctant to just giving it a try.
LikeLike
It’s $20 now
LikeLike
How’s this for direst opener: “Hi. I”m afraid I’m going to have to use a cold opener on you. My name is John. Would you like to go out for a drink sometime?” It’s funny, lets her know what you’re up to, no cheesiness.
[heartiste: i like this in theory, but i’d change the words a little. most girls won’t know what “cold opener” means. say instead “i’m afraid i’m going to have to hit on you. god, this is the last thing i needed today.”]
LikeLike
Ooooh. I like the heartiste variation there. I like that quite a bit. I’ll be using that. And soon.
LikeLike
Yeah I’m wondering why Heartiste doesn’t mention Krauser at all, Krauser’s blog is the most serious daygaming site on the internet by far, with videos and everything, with all due respect to Roosh. I suspect there is an unstated british vs american tribalism going on.
[heartiste: it’s nothing personal. i plan to do a review of krauser, but i want to try his stuff out in field before saying anything. i don’t want to just read his material and throw it back to the readers to judge.]
LikeLike
yeah.
LikeLike
Direct game doesn’t exist. The only game that exist is indirect.
Why do I say that? Not even the people who endorse “Direct Game” are really direct, they show some of their intentions, but not all of their intentions. Even when they say: “I think you’re cute/sexy/I like you, so I came here to talk to you”, they’re being indirect. They never say in an straightforward way in the first encounter: “I want to fuck you”, and even when they say that, they say it as part of an strategy to get her reaction and open her to a conversation, they say as part of an indirect strategy. On the other hand, If you approach only saying that, you’re not going to get very far with the girl. That’s why the only game that exist’s is indirect.
The direct-indirect game, also is developend in different stages of the seduction: you start being indirect, and later on you show your real intentions, you utter them in a way that doesn’t let room for misinterpretations. But first you have to be close, to approach indirectly the prey to give the final blow at the last moment: straight to the neck.
On the other hand, I think game resolves between two extremes: Not approaching at all nor showing any intentions, through the beta I-wine-n-dine-you-so-you-like-me to the extreme of showing entirely your intenions and even enforcing them with your strenght (i.e. rape game).
You can ve verbally indirect, but your intent is always direct. Like when you start a conversation with a woman, you can be talking about any topic, but your body language and your vibe is sexual, you’re flirting, using sexual innuendo, being suggestive, being tacit, being provocative… In that way your are not going to be LJBFed nor ‘I have a boyfriend’ excuse.
Also, the game you use depends on the context you’re in, and sometimes they’re overlooked or ignored: day game, night game, different girls, different venues and different cultures.
LikeLike
Good post.
LikeLike
There’s a niche to develop, people: raw, authentic direct game.
Oh, wait–black guys already run that.
LikeLike
Direct game exists. It’s called force rape. Even so called “date rape” is indirect. only running up to a girl and telling her shes about to get fucked is really direct.
LikeLike
[…] This is a comment I made in Direct vs Indirect Street Game by Heartiste. In this comment I start developing an idea I’ve been having about Game […]
LikeLike
It would recommend never asking ‘Where are you from?’. It is the single, most annoying question. Ever. I entertain myself by making up answers now. Say something original.
LikeLike
True. I even give strippers shit now when they ask where I’m from? “Lets see: we’re in Tampa, not someplace loaded with tourists like Vegas or Disney World – where the fuck do you think I’m from? I’m from the moon, OK – you busted me. … don’t you have any better opening lines?”
LikeLike
Not convinced of Krauser’s ability. He just seems to get lots of FaceBook closes and then believes that he’ll hook up with them at a later date. But how often does he actually post about that happening?
LikeLike
The BEST in street Game is JUSTIN WAYNE. Even better than KRAUSER by far, and he does BOTH direct and indirect game . He has videos from MEET TO LAY in his blog.
http://www.JustinWaynePua.com
He has really great break downs.
Krausers game is less consistent. However I like him a bit too.
LikeLike
Posting this crap here and praising this simian clown for his conquests of no-account White girls and his gloating about their White boyfriends?
You’re either a nigger yourself or have a cuckold fetish.
In either case, keep tap dancing on the land mine, fool.
LikeLike
1) im white
2) Im from NY and see him around coaching all the time he;s legit.
3)and Im just being blatantly honest. The guy’s the best out there from a public domain’s point of view and there is much we can learn from what JW and other day gamers do…
Also, its ok to praise ‘Krauser’ but not ‘Justin Wayne’ .. They both do the same thing….
LikeLike
sorry,
1) im NOT white, im a nigger 🙂
You guys are funny..
LikeLike
Just checked your blog out, Justin. Looks like good stuff. I can tell you’re a smart guy and have put in a ton of time & effort into the game.
LikeLike
Damn, Awesome blog. Lotsa cockas for da ladiezzz.
Bitches are freaky, yo. 90% are cheating on their “boyfriends”. I won’t pull the race card on you like some guys in here would be eager to do. Women are whores and I don’t give a fuck about the colors of the dicks they’re taking.
Your blog is a healthy reminder of the necessity to pump and dump our way to the grave, and to what extent monogamy is a joke.
Keep it up.
LikeLike
For what it’s worth, I think Justin Wayne is for real and rate him in the top five of daygamers who I’ve seen. http://krauserpua.com/day-game-top-ten/
LikeLike
It wasn’t “Day Game” but this approach reminds me of the Cajun “Keys to the VIP” episode where he does something like this:
Watch here:
LikeLike
I am totally awesome looking and I approach girls all the time and score 100% and get laid by hot babes every night, which is why I’m reading a pick-up advice blog.
LikeLike
Don’t you realize that people only read things nowadays that tickle their sensibilities and confirm what they’re already thinking?
LikeLike
Don’t feed the troll.
LikeLike
This is almost as bad as the whole alpha/beta argument. There is a continuum of styles, from very indirect (Roosh) to super direct. What works well for one man, may not work well for another. But, you have to actually try it many many times to get good at it.
Rester, I have seen Krauser do his thing, just like on his videos, with my own eyes. Including running up behind the girl and stopping her. It works. But, you have to have hundreds of approaches done to get the correct vibe, body language, pacing, etc. down. I have tried it myself, and have stopped girls and engaged them in conversation. It didn’t go anywhere, but that’s because I didn’t know what I was doing.
There is no optimal game. This is not like WoW where you can min/max your skill tree for the best damage. Every man has to figure it out on his own.
[heartiste: the mark of a great gamer is a man who can make a cold street approach seem the most natural, spontaneous thing in the world, as if there was no preparation or months of practice beforehand.]
LikeLike
In my experience, Direct Game and a woman’s beauty are correlated in the negative, while Indirect Games and a woman’s beauty are correlated in the positive.
I believe Poon Commandment IX, Connect with her emotions, concretizes the above.
Less attractive women are, generally, more receptive to a man’s bass-balled mating strategy. Due to the paucity of male attention in their lives, mental gymnastics can be minimized reducing the navigation required to set the jousting match between your engorged destrier and her cervix.
More attractive women, conversely, generally numb and indifferent to the impudent threshing flail of peckerdom, require the deft navigation described in Commandment IX to break through their chitinous bitch shields; Indirect Game simultaneously provides the gelignite to do so, and, the anodyne remedy to meet your rendezvous with their beautiful labia minora.
I, personally, prefer to be the arendator of beautiful orifices … now, where’s that damn pest shop?
LikeLike
I find it works better to be indirect with words, but direct in physical action and body language.
LikeLike
Sort of a day game thing.
I’m a married guy and not looking for any side action. I enjoy the discussion and insights here. I find them useful in all kinds of ways.
But today I was at a restaurant waiting for my order to come out on a tray. There was a cute girl there, petite, a 7.5 , maybe 25, waiting too. I am over six feet, tolerably handsome, not built, but I had a winter coat on, and I’m about twice her age. A song was playing which I happen to like and I was audibly singing along, as I usually do if I like a song, because I don’t give a shit what anyone thinks at this point in my life. The girl is not looking at me, but I remembered the post where the Chateau’s proprietor said always at least say “hi” to any pretty girl, and that came to mind. So, I say to her, “pardon me singing along, this is an all time favorite,” with a smile. Which was true. She gives me a surprised but genuine smile and starts saying she was sort of bopping to it herself, which she actually was not. OK, so I say, “so you’re downtown shopping for some nice new clothes?” in a sort of making-fun-of-girls sort of way. Or something close to that. And OK, it was lame, but WTF, I was surprised to get the smile and the pleasant response. And I have flirted with a female maybe three times since the first Bush presidency. What happened next was textbook. I had not meant that comment as a neg. I had not meant it as anything, really. She smiled, looked sort of mock offended and said “so, you are saying I need some decent clothes?” In total Spock-like dork fashion (my true self), I almost wanted to say out loud: “fascinating!” She took a random blathering comment, interpreted it as a NEG and turned it around into a gentle but unambiguous SHIT TEST. I totally fucked the pooch with a reflexively Beta comeback, something like “nah, you look fine.” I should have said, “yeah, actually, you probably should,” take it and amplify it, with a smile. Whatever, anything, not submit like a puppy — which really did pop out by reflex. So she immediately says “no, WE are down here doing …” yadda yadda. Having failed the shit test, she places the boyfriend chess piece into the conversation, again right out of the textbook. A few more lines of idle chat and my food came. I had nothing at stake, and I lost no dignity. It was all in a spirit of scientific investigation. No, really.
If I had been seriously interested, and played the second move decently instead of badly, I think I could have gotten a phone number even though the BF was only thirty feet away. Someone who had tight game could have, for sure. I even think she glanced over to check to see if he could see us talking, when she first responded to me. As it happened he was in a booth with his back to us and could not. (Tip to BFs — don’t sit in a booth with your back turned in a public place or your GF will talk to any damn yahoo who comes along.)
My take away is that the rules on this site are almost as simple as checkers, and they are empirically as real as gravity and electromagnetism. It is 100% a matter of willpower and practice and not being discombobulated when the girl actually smiles at you. I knew all this already by observation. But today’s little episode was further confirmation.
Gentlemen, your destiny is up to you.
LikeLike
You might have blown it by your beta-response. But if a girl I want drops the boyfriend line with me, I won’t give a shit about him. I’ll keep talking and get her number anyway.
LikeLike
her, ” i has bf”…me, ” I dont care”
LikeLike
“and?”
LikeLike
her: i have a boyfriend.
you: oh. would he like to watch?
LikeLike
her: so, you are saying i need some decent clothes?’
you: girls don’t need clothes when they’re with me
pretty much any answer is better than ‘nah, you look fine’, because you opened her by teasing her, but then backed off when she stepped it up. shit test failed, access denied. all your balls are belong to blue.
exorcise spock. bring in the kirk.
LikeLike
I think, feminist shit like the #marchadelasputas , the colombian version of the slutwalk, affect every game attempt you try on the street, because now every approach can be seen as sexual harrassment. The feminist infection has arrived to my Country, to my city, to my Transmilenio.
http://www.semana.com/galeria-nacion/putas-marcharon-bogota/835.aspx
http://noticiascaracol.com/nacion/video-258555-cientos-de-mujeres-se-unieron-a-la-llamada-marcha-de-putas
http://www.semana.com/mundo/marcha-putas-expande-mundo/161688-3.aspx
http://www.semana.com/nacion/no-significa-no-sera-lema-marcha-putas-colombia/162685-3.aspx
What kind of game can we use in this poisoned envyronment?
LikeLike
Girls will always love attractive/confident men in any environment. The actual definition of sexual harassment is getting hit on by an unappealing guy.
LikeLike
Yes, that’s a very subjective criticism… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsZlLDGs604&feature=related
“Be attractive, don’t be unnatractive”
Women will love atractive confident men in any environment, but how do betas become alphas if they are going to be denounced when training to become alpha (when approaching)?
LikeLike
I’m fairly short and fairly poor, but on occasion day game works for me.
I chalk this up to my street smarts and virtually unassailable ego. Once you stop giving a shit, good things happen.
LikeLike
I wonder if one of the reasons for low success rate in direct game could be the demand for a quick response. I recently had a guy approach me on the escalator. I had maybe two seconds to respond and was in the middle of a thought, so it didn’t go anywhere. But in retrospect, what he said was cool and kind of sweet.
LikeLike
[…] Myself Nicely.”Heartiste – “It’s Time for Women to Woman Up“, “Direct vs. Indirect Street Game”Danger & Play – “Why Game Styles Differ“, “The Trojan […]
LikeLike
I’ve had that happen, margaret. I consider myself pretty sharp, but I often get very lost in my thoughts. Its not that I’m too stupid to respond, its that I’m disengaging from a very deep conversation with myself 🙂 And it is a shame thinking about a missed opportunity later.
LikeLike
Hello all, I’m a supporter and frequent reader of this blog and this is the first time for me to be posting here. I’d like to start by thanking the authors of this blog for their material and for the battle they (and we) are waging against the deluge of overly masculinated, overly fed, and just overly embarrassing women of my country(USA).
I currently work in Asia and will be moving to Shanghai next week to begin teaching in a university there. Without a doubt, being in Asia and experiencing the femininity of the women here has opened my eyes to a reality which must be seen and experienced firsthand to understand. If you are a player, as I am, and attracted to femininity, then I recommend that you do yourself a favor and take a trip to Asia.
As this blog focuses a lot on the idea of masculinity and femininity, I’d like to add a small piece on the subject written by a blogger named Fred Reed, who talks about those ideas and how they essentially relate to why white men prefer Asian women. At this point in time, he says it better than I could:
http://www.fredoneverything.net/AsianWomen.shtml
cheers, and by the way…I like using direct game from time to time, if only for the purpose of habitually proving to myself that I still have the balls to look a woman whom I don’t know in the eye and state my desire.
LikeLike
Also, on the subject of day game. The running strategy, among normal people (so non-PUAs) in my country, for day game, is the following: approach a girl you like and hand her a piece of paper with your number written on it, followed by “Give me a call if you’re interested” comment. What do you think about?
[heartiste: horrible.]
As for direct game, all I can say is that my short, decent looking friend has been doing direct game approaches on the street for about a month now with no real results.
[your comment reeks of troll.]
LikeLike
OT
Heartiste,
[heartiste: u rang?]
What´s your take on females and HBD issues?
[i’m a big fan of healthy beef drapes.]
I know that you are HBD knowledgeble (following Half Sigma for instance) Are you ever allowed to bring up facts like racial cognitive differences while dating.
[i’m “allowed” to talk about anything i want. but, you know, i prefer to talk about fun, flirty stuff with girls. call me crazy!]
Of course its a no no, during the first dates, but what about later on?
[the subject almost never comes up in real life, except tangentially and tacitly, like when she clings a little tighter to me as we veer down a street known to be occupied by delinquents. i strongly believe this is the way it is for most normal people.]
LikeLike
“Direct game would theoretically work best on impulsive and, yes, dumber girls who better appreciate the stark boldness of an assertive man.”
Wow. Did I really just read that on the Chateau? And the Looks Do Matter post over at Rollo’s…wtf happened, did the Jezebel writers take over the manosphere blogs this weekend? What’s next? “make sure you only go for the same day lay with girls at the bar because they’re sluts and quality girls won’t put out that fast”? “negs only work on stupid insecure girls”? “all that game stuff might work on those young college girls but it’d never work on a mature intellectual girl like my co-worker i have one-itis for Janice!”
Jesus.
What kind of game do you think every guy is running on the 10 as she goes about her day? Indirect game. Because the genius at the convenience store, the grocery store, the guy serving her McDonalds, the guy asking her for the time, the guy asking her for directions, the guy making small talk on the bus, the bus driver, they’re all fucking geniuses who’ve figured out a way to talk to her without risking rejection. A confident guy who basically says flat out “hey, you’re hot. I deserve you. Now show me why you’re worth my time beyond your looks.” is fucking refreshing.
Why? Because all the indirect guys are full of shit, pretending not to want her. The direct guy is congruent and acting in line with his desires. He’s confident enough to risk rejection but he expects NOT to be rejected. That’s the kind of guy who’s secure and confident enough to handle dating a 10.
That said, I like indirect game for the day time. Why? Because it ends up in the same place as direct game when you do it right. Most guys doing indirect game suck ass. They ask for directions then talk about stupid shit for 20 minutes and then make a gay-ass shopping buddy date with the girl or ask for her Facebook. If they ever finally get the girl alone its like surprise, I have a penis!!! And the girl goes “wtf?? I thought you were my buddy!!”
If you go indirect, you should be doing indirect with a purpose. You should be looking for opportunities to escalate and lead the interaction to sex right from “how do I get to Place?”. Yes, even in the daytime. Drop innuendo, qualify her then state your interest, push for her # and going out for drinks not her Facebook and her helping you go shopping.
So indirect game should become direct game as soon as possible. The major difference is that you’re going in uninterested until she qualifies herself beyond her looks, then flooring the gas. VS at night where the girls are already asking to be qualified by their looks just by going out dressed up. Or VS shitty indirect game where you never floor the gas and you brag to all your buddies that you totally picked up this super HB10+++++ when in reality she’ll probably flake on you because she needs cock not another “buddy” and you’ll txt her for months and invite her out and flirt on Facebook and feel like the pimp but will never actually put your P in her V because instead of treating her like you’d treat an ugly chick you feel you deserve, you put her up on an indirect game pedestal. I’ve got a buddy who photographs models and he’s always showing us pics of the girls he’s photographing and acting like he’s a pimp for “knowing” these hotties. I just ask him “so have you fucked her yet?” the answer is always no. And he never will. But he’s happy enough with the validation of hanging around them, he doesn’t care about actual jizz on her face results.
What’s the difference between day game and night game? The sun is out.
[heartiste: i am chastened! nonetheless, here’s my main concern with direct day game: i think direct approaches — and by direct i mean openers where you tell the girl in so many words that you like her look, style, or vibe and wanted to meet her — means it’s going to wind up being more of a numbers game, with more outright rejections expected up front based on the man’s looks, body language, clothes, or whatever. indirect day game, by contrast, is the more “game”-centric type of approach, since it relies less on a few instant attractions and more on building attraction with the women you approach.
am i making sense here, or am i off-base? i’m willing to concede on this impression, because my day game is/has been mostly indirect. i don’t do many TRUE direct day game approaches, at least in the sense that i identify directness.
anyhow, after perusing krauser’s day game vids and FRs — and he’s a self-described direct day gamer — i’ve come to the conclusion that the direct vs indirect dichotomy is misleading. krauser, for instance, runs what i would call plausibly deniable direct game. in one vid i watched, he approaches the girl from behind, stops her when he reaches her, and says “excuse me, may i tell you something?”… he doesn’t wait for her to answer before continuing… “you were walking by just there with a reeeeeally serious expression on your face”. now is that direct or indirect? it’s certainly not asking for directions, but neither is it effusing about her cuteness and how he had to meet her. of course, she’s not stupid. she knows on a subconscious level as soon as the convo opened that he went up to her because he’d like to eventually fuck her. but plausibly deniable direct game means that you, the man, aren’t risking an immediate rejection with a blatantly sexual/complimentary/flattering opener. you’re showing more direct interest than the schlub asking for directions, but less interest than the don juan mooning over her exotic beauty.
anyhow, i’m gonna hit the resources again because i think this concept of direct vs indirect is being underserved by the community. it’s confusing a lot of guys and some basic premises need to be hammered out.]
LikeLike
I think the problem is that different people picture direct being different things. Guys who don’t do direct just picture the cartoon character version where you chase the girl down, shout “YOU’RE SO HOT I HAD TO SAY HI.” and then stand there staring at her until she goes “omg I just creamed my pants, here’s my phone number call me asap so we can have sex!!!”
The reality is that instead of:
“Hey, hold up, I thought you were cute and had to say hello.”
“Oh, uhhh…hi?”
“Ya I like your dress…the color really brings out your eyes.”
“…okay…”
“So uhh…want to go out sometime?”
It’s more:
“YOU. Who ARE you? (breaking rapport (accusing) tone, as if she’s not supposed to be there doing whatever she’s doing)”
“Oh, uhh, I’m Sally?”
“Well Sally, I saw you from across the room and had to come say hello. I think we’re going to have to have a million babies together.”
“omg lol umm no thanks lol”
“Alright, then we’ll start with coffee instead.”
etc.
The difference is basically that the way people picture direct game and the way a lot of newbies run direct game, they throw out a compliment then just sit there and wait for a reaction from the girl. That’s where it becomes a numbers game, she either likes you or doesn’t. Most of the time the girl is thinking “ooookay….? Thanks? What am I supposed to respond to that?” because the guy is putting the onus on her to lead things.
The way to be running direct is to follow-up your statements of interest with statements, observations, cold-reads, teasing, questions, etc. That whole “game” thing we all love.
A solid method that disarms with indirect but instantly switches to direct would be something like:
“Hey, how do I get to Place?”
“oh, umm I think it’s 2 blocks that way and then turn–”
“lol I don’t actually need directions. I just thought you were cute and wanted to come flirt with you. Who are you?”
“omg lol ummm Sally omg”
“I haven’t seen you around here before Sally, you must be (cold read, teasing, etc.)”
etc.
For what I was talking about, where guys run indirect game with no purpose to it, here’s an off the top of my head example of indirect game WITH PURPOSE (ie – everything said and done is said and done with the goal of progressing things towards the close):
“Hey, how do I get to Place?”
“oh, umm I think it’s 2 blocks that way and then turn–”
“It sounds like you’re just making that up.” (accusation/teasing)
“lol no I just–”
“If you don’t know, you can just say so. Why are you messing with poor lost strangers who just need help? You MONSTER.” (teasing, accusing, cold-reading)
“omg!! lol no I’m not I was–”
“No, it’s too late, I hate you now. But I’m willing to let you make it up to me over drinks sometime. You free this weekend?” (push/pull, pushing for the close)
“well I have a boyfriend!”
“That’s okay. We’ll invite him too. Then you can give him made up directions so he gets lost and we can keep flirting.” (pushing for the close)
“omg well we’re getting married…”
“Not after we have drinks you won’t be.” (pushing for the close)
etc.
Where a lot of guys doing indirect will go for a super gay safe close (“surprise!! I have a penis!” game):
“Hey, what do you think of this shirt?”
“It’s nice, blue looks good on you.”
“Awesome (gay high-five)! You should be my personal shopping assistant. I’m updating my wardrobe this weekend, you should come along and help me out.”
etc.
Now you have to go from friend zone to fucking her, and that’s if you can even get her to show up again. A 10 has already got a dozen shopping buddies, including her BFF girlfriend she grew up with who needs help shopping for her wedding dress and a sugar-daddy guy who’s flying her to Vegas and giving her $1500 spending money to shop with. Why the fuck would she care about helping you out? I mean, she might, especially if she’s average to ugly, but this is where you get into “I know a ton of hot girls, they’re all on my Facebook and flirt with me, look!!” “How many have you actually fucked?” “…well, I’m working on it.” bullshit.
Newbies to indirect will also often give up and totally change their intentions to avoid rejection at the first sign of resistance, since they picked indirect thinking it was a way to avoid rejection in the first place so you see shit like:
“you should come along and help me out.”
“well I have a boyfriend!”
“oh that’s okay, we’d just be hanging out as friends. I just think you have a cool sense of style.”
“I guess that’s okay then…”
WOOO SOLID CLOSE!! TOTALLY GONNA BONE HER, BRO!!!!
The worst is when the guy is practically begging for the number and backing off his original intentions and down-playing what he wants to try to coax the girl out, thinking he’s going to 180 it if he can JUST get her alone for a couple hours (sometimes he can, often he can’t since he’s playing “surprise! I have a penis!” game):
“we should go out for drinks”
“I don’t know, I’m pretty busy”
“how about during the day? I’m going clothes shopping and could use a female opinion” (backing off original intent)
“well I’m not very good with fashion stuff…”
“oh c’mon, look at you’re, your style is great” (undeserved compliment, too eager)
“I just kind of threw this on…”
“well we can just hang out in the food court and chat…how about I get your number?” (backing off original intent)
“umm well I have a boyfriend…”
“that’s okay, we can just be friends, how about Facebook?” (backing off original intent)
etc.
Jesus. I wanted to punch myself just typing that out. I see interactions like that with newbies a lot and they’re painful.
Lots of nuances here, but hopefully this clears what I’m talking about up. Guys should experiment with both styles of game to learn what works for them. I like using indirect during day game, but I don’t pussy around with it. That’s why I say indirect and direct both pretty much lead to the same place: My intentions are clear to the girl asap and I’m not backing down or apologizing for it. My congruency to it and my frame control (the adamant belief that we WILL be having sex eventually) is often what makes the difference in the end.
Does it mean that ultimately I get “rejected” more than the “well we can just hang out and chat, can I have your Facebook?” guy? Sure. But is he really having “success”? He probably collects more numbers ultimately, but a lot more of them are going to be a ton of work or have no actual sexual interest in him.
Are 10 safe friendly indirect number-closes in your phone where you can probably convert 3 of them after investing a ton of time, effort, etc. into digging yourself out of the friend zone after a totally “innocent” hangout or two while 7 of those numbers lead you on and waste your time/effort with no intention of fucking you or not realizing you want to be more than friends better than 7 up-front rejections but 3 direct number-closes in your phone where they’re ready to come directly to your house to fuck you with no need for 7 hours worth of shopping trips and dinner and drinks etc. together?
Depends on how much free time/money you have I guess lol When I was younger and hanging out with girls in general was new to me, the safe indirect stuff was fun. A few hours walking around downtown with a girl and shooting the shit and going on a couple dates before finally getting laid was fine, I was just enjoying the whole “being around a girl” thing and I had money to burn on big long adventures like that. Now I don’t have much free time and I’m poor as fuck lol so I’d rather be up front about my intentions so she knows if we hang out, we’re going to be fucking.
LikeLike
Solid, basically a great blog post in a comment. This site will be mined in the future as if it were treasure.
LikeLike
‘backing off original intent’ is basically self-ljbf’ing. a guy may as well just save himself some time and open a girl with ‘can i be your friend?’
great posts. almost makes up for you not disclosing the circumstances under which you defecated in that girls’ ear.
LikeLike
That was a very helpful reply. Thumbs up. Enlightening stuff, I think this’ll help me. Much thanks!
LikeLike
haha dude… “don’t have much free time and i’m poor as fuck” get a job and stop molesting chicks on the street… it’s creepy
LikeLike
Krauser has other more direct ones than the one you linked to though
e.g.
http://krauserpua.com/2011/07/30/you-dont-have-to-verbalise-sex-to-make-a-girl-horny/
LikeLike
I am new to PUA and I found this page after a google search on direct/indirect as I wanted some guidance. I am okay looking – I’ve had a few HB GFs before finding PUA, 5ft 11. I have a runners body but don’t work out – style is ok ay but being worked on!
I can do indirect/situational openers in shops or at events but I’d like to be able to just walk up to girls in the street, too indirect here feels to me like I would be being dishonest because I am scared to say what’s really on my mind – I either know or don’t care where the pet shop is, I just want to get to know the girl as well as possible.
The way it feels to me at the moment is that the only way to stop a girl in the street is by telling them why I stopped them – which is some version of ‘they are attractive/stylish’ but maybe wrapped up in some kind of situational thing like the weather or current fashion, whatever.
Anyway, there are some really good comments on here that have given me a bit of ‘direction’ on how to go direct so I wanted to say thanks!
LikeLike
I know what you mean about being afraid to really say what’s on your mind. Whenever I see a really hot chick, what’s really on my mind is, among other things, wanting to lick her asshole.
I did in fact direct game a chick once, in 1986, telling her that. The Honolulu street whore I used it on was so offended, she looked at me in horror, said, “I don’t do that shit,” turned her back on me, and walked away. More than a quarter century later, I still haven’t worked up the nerve to be that direct at the outset again.
LikeLike
Lolz.
Real men fuck whores. Keep it up, DJ.
LikeLike
“heartiste: horrible.”
It’s kind of like direct game, except the piece of paper is handed out instead of saying the words.
[heartiste: there’s effective direct game and there’s ineffective direct “game”. handing a piece of paper to a girl with a message on it that amounts to “I heart you. will you be my valentine?” like some sixth grader and then walking away hoping she’ll call you is beyond no game; it’s anti-game. i can actually see girls getting viscerally turned off by this gimmick, and showing it to their friends later for a cruel laugh.]
I can see though, why you might it’s terrible, no conversation means no opportunity to demonstrate value, etc.
[it’s a shot in the dark, and girls will recognize it as being exactly that. men who take shots in the dark, like drive-by catcallers, are essentially cowards.]
And no, I am not trolling. He did get numbers in night game with the same kind of approaches.
[at night, locked in a venue like a club where girls have nowhere to go, it might work if he stands there waiting for a response, a shit-eating grin plastered on his face. it’s still pretty bad though.]
LikeLike
A girl I know recently went out on a date with a guy who had the waitress bring over his business card.
She’s now pissed at him because he often cancels new dates to go see other girls.
LikeLike
Maybe, but my general experience is that there is no need to print more business cards or create private cards because women simply won’t call based on that. The guy has to get the number off of her or, preferably, the instadate.
That said, I had a fantastic date yesterday that resulted from a woman I’d dumped calling me to ask to borrow $30. I told her I would give her that if she introduced me to someone as hot as herself. She complied. Except, while she was a 7.5, she introduced me to an 8.5 whose personality is more interesting as well. That was one way of making lemonade with a lemon.
LikeLike
i can actually see girls getting viscerally turned off by this gimmick, and showing it to their friends later for a cruel laugh.
if i were a girl, i’d hang on to his number, and give it out to other chumps who asked me for my number
pay it forward.
LikeLike
OT: Maternity nurses “aggressors,” not RFK son: Dr.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57385215/maternity-nurses-aggressors-not-rfk-son-dr/
“Douglas Kennedy said he was trying to take the baby out of Northern Westchester Hospital for a quick walk when a group of nurses who thought the infant should remain indoors tried to stop him.”
He’s taking his baby for a walk in sunlight and fresh air, right near the hospital, nurses physically attack him, endangering baby.. HE gets charged w/ “harassment and endangering the welfare of a child.”
“.. Westchester District Attorney Janet DiFiore.. ”
Hmm.. where have I heard that name before?
1996, White cop shoots dead a Black man who was hitting the cop’s father w/ a baseball bat.
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local&id=6401456
“.. the district attorney at the time, Jeanine Pirro, called the killing a bias crime.” (later Judge Pirro, now on TV..)
2008, after 11 years in prison, cop is freed. “District Attorney Janet DiFiore said she was looking forward to arguing the case in the state Appellate Division. Judge Bellantoni’s decision, she said, “is wrong on the facts and wrong on the law.”
LikeLike
You may find this amusing. A politician wants to ban sexist ads, but provides no real criteria for doing so other than ‘disconnect’. Why? Because it promotes rape.
http://www.thelocal.ch/2662/20120223/
Now apart from the more than probable impossibility for the politician to provide anyone with a causal link between car averts and rape, why is this being pitched? Because because a) Men make the most money and b) like to look at pretty girls. Yell and stamp your feet, but it’s true. And this politician is well past her fuckable years….
LikeLike
Here’s a smoooooth talker for you to dissect.
http://melodymaker.posterous.com/the-reason-some-girls-stay-single-very-funny
LikeLike
It’s outrageous that so many sites on the net these days assume that people will use Facebook real name accounts to say anything but the most sterile politically correct pablum.
Naturally, nobody criticized the girl for giving her number to someone she planned to flake on. That would be politically incorrect.
LikeLike
I suspect the answer lies in what happens at the target’s subconscious level here. She “knows” at some level what’s going on but if you go too “direct” you activate the conflict between fore- and hindbrain which might not resolve itself in your favor. However if you go too “indirect” (pet shop, directions) she might not realize what’s going on and once you are pigeonholed into the “guy asking for directions” category it might be difficult to get out of it.
If you go in with strong alpha sub-communication (body language doesn’t need to be aggressively alpha but still reflect a minimum threshold of confidence via eye contact, posture and calm facial expression) and if you do the opener right (i.e. it comes across as spontaneous/normal and not scripted or weird), you’ll get a minute of “deer frozen in headlights” grace period (that’s literally how she looks like sometimes – she just can’t believe or fully *rationally* comprehend what’s happening), a short window of opportunity when you can continue to sub-communicate alpha traits [See (*) below] as she is trying to figure out if she likes you or not. I remember a great clip on krauser’s blog where he sees a girl at the traffic light on the other side of the street, he crosses the street, and opens her in front of all bystanders with some random comment about the color of her dress. Clearly not direct, but also not indirect opener. However, the vibe was definitely sub-communicating a strong direct intent. Don’t want to repeat the obvious here but there it’s not what you say but how you say it and how soon you clarify your “directness” (which you’ll have to eventually do). I see the direct vs indirect dicotomy as a chronological continuum. you can open using either but then the key is to clarify your intent sooner than later. I think the “traditional” indirect approach is slower at communicating intent, but i could be wrong here.
(*)
Alpha traits you can prove in the first 1-2 minutes of day game interaction:
-Grace under pressure: her rational mind will verbalize things like, “I should get going”, which is effectively a “sh&t test” in disguise to gauge your alpha pull. the way you deal with it is crucial;
-boldness: amply covered in CH – the more difficult the approach you pull off the more boldness props you get (subject to diminishing returns though)
-abundance mindset: light teasing etc amply covered in CH
-Social engineering/conversational ju-jitsu: the ability to start a conversation out of nowhere and leading it into a socially recognizable format (comfort stage) very quickly is a way to bias the numbers game in your favor. My experience is that if you eject before this stage the likelihood of a day 2 are heavily reduced.
the approach above is what has worked for me so far. FYI, I am 5’9′, fit, high 30ies, normally suited. by the way, Krauser’s book has helped me and i strongly recommend it.
LikeLike
dont try this.. i will curse the fuck out of u…if ur not in a fast car or a drop top talk to the homeless fool..
LikeLike
I my youth when I had no idea of game, I reallyhad to rely mostly on my confidence level. the routine that you outlined abve is the one closest to my pre-game pick up and it brought results, prety good for a guy who doesnt know manosphere, but I had to admit that the first time I learned Indirect game esp. the one that transcends from opinion openers to connection routines it was very excruciating in the head at first, It was like I went back to zero, like I sudenly lost words and routines because I was following some checklist although it really helped me through right now with more practice. I can conclude that my level of comfort using semi-direct game as above stated is higher than compared to other men, therefore I can tell that direct game works well in certain groups of man but every man who wishes to maximize his succes with women must still learn indirect game complete with following the stages of pickup from opening, attraction, to closing. and it will require practice going through a stage of discomfort wheter you are fresh or a natural.
LikeLike
Here’s a tip:
In the *daytime* you want to be funny, or at least amusing. Not a clown, you’re not going for the guffaw — just sharp and witty and willing to risk her entitled annoyance by getting in her tense face and defusing the bomb with charm. In the day you want to relaxedly banter with all females, at all times, as a habit.
You acquire a nice subtle confident edge when you assume the right to speak to anyone, anywhere, at any time. Criminals, con-men and thugs always do this and the normal man reading here can do it too, you just need to grow a pair. “Indirect game” seems too technical a phrase for *turning on the charm.*
At night, things change. Make whatever play you want, however you want, and if the female likes what she sees and hears, well, maybe you get the pussy. Try to enjoy the chaos of the night, because that’s what it is.
For most of the highly intelligent, hard-normal, clean-jeaned and dress-shirted regular dudes reading and posting here, turning on the charm in daytime venues is more likely to get you what you really want: a cute girl to fuck on the regular.
[heartiste: good comment.]
LikeLike
“In fact, any kind of interaction with a girl is liable to be interpreted as interest in getting her naked. So there’s no good reason to worry about her suspicions. Girls KNOW. The only question that should matter to you is HOW you want girls to know. Most girls like it when a man couches his sexual intentions in plausibly deniable flirtations and rambles.”
100%.
For dudes that are actively practicing pickup, pay extra attention to the last sentance and digest this into your inner game.
LikeLike
I was going to post with an idea for day game but I field tested it yesterday and I found it wanting.
On the street yesterday, I started listening to a song on my mobile phone from a female artist of a past generation who really conveyed the essence of what a woman should be like from the moment you meet her. I figured that it would be good advice for guys to listen to such an artist because it would make him feel that much more confident and optimistic about approaching a hot woman on the street.
I was wrong.
You see, the hottest women mostly do not smile or fall in love at first sight when you approach them and open them in any way.
They are wary. Often they are rude, which shouldn’t be an impediment if they’re 9 or above because they feel they have to be that way.
So, if you’ve prepared yourself by listening to an “ideal” singing one of your favorite songs, you’ll just be repulsed by the lesser women you find yourself having to deal with.
About 15 minutes after I started testing this theory, I saw what was close to a 10 walk with her friend through an archway to a courtyard where I found them taking a smoke. Normally smoking takes two points off a woman’s attractiveness but not with this one.
But when I approached and asked directions, I got a rude “I don’t know”. I thought “This is the opposite of how an ideal woman would behave” and I bailed. I thanked her friend because I was thinking that she had used less of a sneer. I walked away.
I hated myself for having walked away. The rudeness was just something to be expected at first. I could have said that I was new in town and I wanted to know how newcomers were accepted. That’s an open-ended direct opener with plausible deniability on the sex maniac part.
But part of the problem was that I had made the mistake of imagining an ideal, of having been too optimistic, too confident that women will all like me at first sight, which is often the case with women 8 or less.
It’s better to be prepared for resistance, fear, wariness.
LikeLike
The only time I go direct is when my knowledge of the language is weak, then I really have no other choice since I can’t communicate much.
If you look into the game of direct guys, they don’t have a lot else to say so they are forced to box themselves in with a narrow and rigid approach and pray to Santa that the girl likes his look. Humans have since evolved and can now communicate things besides one opening sentence that lays all the cards on the table.
I would have been all about direct game 3,000 years ago.
LikeLike
Actually, I disagree that one opening sentence where you comment that she is attractive lays all the cards on the table.
The big unanswered question no matter how attractive the man is, is: “Is he a player?”
Everything about your attractiveness may be in place for her, but she doesn’t have the _date across time_ to determine whether you will do what is most important to most non-sluts: “Is he going to stay around and support a family?”
Not really relevant to those into sluts or pump and dump however.
LikeLike
William the Conqueror seems to have preferred direct game:
LikeLike
Did Mathilde agree to marry in order to save her father from a duel?
LikeLike
Firstly, thank God (or Hitchens or whomever) for finding sites like le Chateau and showing the way towards enlightenment, hopefully recovering beta-ism in terms of learning the ropes of the tangled maze of rabbit holes called female thinking…
Being 41, I’m nevertheless considerably younger-looking and thus finding the Truth may not be too late for me, ehh. The problem is not so much _not_ having an alpha air and attitude per se — being an architect (with more of the Skidmore, Owings & Merrill suit “yuppie” air than the art school type) with the intelligence, sense of style (yesss, salary was paid today) and rather handsomish looks connected with a somewhat, hum, entitled, sense of self, I know I come out “on the street” more alphish than is the case. In fact, I’ve used negs and A&A myself for aeons without knowing that they are in fact a subject of academic PUA white papers. But without proper application and reading of the mind they would be merely blunt instruments used without required sharp finesse.
The problem is definitely a sense of introvert mindset and often the difficulty of getting arsed enough (“why the f*k would I approach her”).
Once I get past the initial approach anxiety rush, however, I slot right down to my “salesman” attitude. The only problem is pounding in the transfer material to build on the initial stuff. I’m in fact from the same Finnish surroundings (and as a Finnish speaker) as one of the earlier commentators and the same restrictions apply. Finding the game has, however, added a sense of interest atop the mere zombie trotting — finding a more keen eye on gauging the opposite sex and possible openings (yes, pun intended) for a scenario. Like a whole new way to look at one’s surroundings.
A case study might be an early, rather non-gamish due to time restraints and all, set: a mid-20s grocery store cashier whom I _had_ to “try out” with an approach. I had gone through her register about an hour earlier and she had shown IMO more than regular interest, although, in a true Finnish sense, there was nothing special said. I could also see her returning my glance with a smile as I exited past her on my way out. So, after the lunch-hour I returned, buying an overpriced prop water bottle.
Adding to the times-constraints was an older gentleman who let me got to the register before his mountain of shoppings.
Me: “1,70 for a water bottle??”
The tall smart Nordic blonde homecoming queen (who the f*k there yelled “pedestal”?): “Yes, that’s what it costs.”
Me: “You don’t have any coffee sold here?” (As if I didn’t know)
Her: “There’s a coffee shop on the other side of the road.”
Me: “Would you like to go there?”
Her (scolding-like): “I cannot go in the midst of my shift.”
Me: “Not _now_, but sometimes.” (betaish, admittedly)
Her: “No.”
Me: “No?”
Her: “No.”
Me: “Well, cannot be helped.”
Mistakes aplenty undoubtedly, but the time-constraints were a hindrance, and moreover, I relied somewhat on the original IOIs (or my thinking them as such) as a justification for a taken-unawares transfer to a direct game/try. I didn’t push because I could see that there wasn’t sufficient interest to go on. I had originally thought of asking if she likes coffee and then asking her “out” (“is there any coffee? you do like coffee? would you like to get one sometimes”) but what she said allowed me to surprise her even better, which in itself is a pleasure. And anyway, this was a beginner’s try-out game with little invested emotionally.
But little by little…
LikeLike
You sound like you just found this site. Keep reading and I mean all the archives. You have days ahead of you. Do not leave the house until you’re through because that scene with the cashier was disastrous. The PUA police should arrest beginners like you who haven’t read enough material yet, in order to keep them off the streets. 😉
Specifically, you hadn’t established attraction. You hadn’t gotten her name. You knew nothing about her nor made her qualify herself to you in any way. You mistook the concept of time constraint in that, in this case, you should not have gone through the checkout with anyone behind you waiting. Basically, you did everything wrong.
If you’re going to see a cashier every day, you have time to establish a first name relationship. You can also ask her about her financial situation which is probably miserable, except in socialist Finland, your taxes are keeping her from being hungry and thus allowing her to be more feminist than the Russian girls two hours away across the border. Through your taxes, you basically paid her to say no to you.
Cashiers tend to be the stupidest of women unless they’re just 16.
LikeLike
Thanks for the honest opinion, I do appreciate it. I agree that the base for action was weak and that there was really no established connection between us. Just a stab in the dark, so to say. As for the establishment of connection, I believe that it may be a bit too much of an uphill battle now. I saw her today for the first time in two weeks (still works there, apparently, heh) and she had an overly tepid facial attitude that merely confirmed what you wrote. She didn’t accuse me of being a mind-rapist perv, but she might have if she had spoken her mind. That’s her “prerogative”, but I really doubt I have the interest to work too much on someone who has seen even such an underwhelming pick-up as an inconcievable attack on her female integrity. Not that it wouldn’t have been a largest of surprises but still.
As for the localized variables, one must remember that here the customary social interaction is truly spartan compared (especially) to the US, where the everyday connection between complete strangers is like from another planet. Some people here would have rather unflattering opinions about the true sincerety of that, but the psychological difference in attitude is rather staggering nevertheless. (Not that I’m a great fan myself of NYC delis’ proprietors, who mostly beat even the most brusque cashiers here in grumpiness…) Even a subdued US-type charm attack isn’t something that might be viewed positively, I’m afraid. First name basis, gushing inquiries into one’s day’s events etc. are usually just not done within our dark latitudes…
Cashiers indeed can often be of the stupid type, but here it is common for college students to do such low-paid jobs, especially before establishing themselves into internships. That’s because the paucity of state subsidy keeps the students on a very lean diet and forcing to take student loans. So, even though the education itself is “socialized”, the price of living is rather steep, especially in the capital. That’s why I could establish the cashier as a sort-of good-girl-next-door swotty type student.
But yeah, if I see her again, I might try some damage control, just as a learning experience.
LikeLike
“Calculated spontaneity”! I suppose spontaneity is like sincerity – once you’ve learned how to fake it, you’ve got it made.
LikeLike
Plausible Deniability Direct game is where its at, And there is a huge difference between direct opening and direct game. Many women do not want to look that easy. So that will make them say NO to a guy that they would probably have sex with if the social situation seemed more “serendipity-like”. I find this especially true for the Anglo- Speaking women who were brought up under this post-feministic culture.
As long as your consistently moving forward towards a direct place I think it’s fine.
On a side note, If I stop a girl.. i will say something like “Excuse me…” just to measure her initial level of receptiveness. If she is smiling and seems open, direct works well since she is in a good mood.
If she looks at me in a more formal manner, or like she does not really want to talk, I would go indirect.
Ive had many success from meet to sex with women that gave me the “yuck” look on the “Excuse me” but then the indirect way proved best for establishing some basic social comfort so I can finally hit on her.
I ask that everyone test this theory out. Throw a tester to see like “Excuse me..” see how receptive she looks in that moment. and then choose direct or indirect….
🙂
LikeLike
This is gold. You do have to be ready with the indirect game once the woman looks at you with disdain and, for instance, tells you that she doesn’t know where it is you are asking directions about with a tone of voice that shows she doesn’t care and didn’t like being asked.
LikeLike
If Heartiste wants,
I can provide two video’s ” im considered average and have a lower socio-economic status
… one with direct day game on an attractive white woman in the streets.
and another approach with an indirect angle with a cute white girl that seems uncomfortable and I progressively navigate with her.
of course, if he wants to break it down
both of them I through a “Tester” to test the current level of receptiveness
[heartiste: yes. if you send me links to vids i’ll post them here with accompanying analysis. btw, what do you mean by a “tester”?]
LikeLike
I would say 99% of men who open, already have a set opener in mind without even testing the receptive levels of the woman.
Instead, I would say something like “Excuse me….” and instead of sticking to the direct opener..I will gauge her initial vibe interms of the way she looks at me.. Is she open and happy at that time? is she more in a lost and formal tone?
This greatly affects the game afterwards… Even if she sticks around and listen, if you use the wrong path, it takes off more points than you would like.
For instance, if I throw a tester and notices that she does not look open … If i still go direct, she may stay a little just to be polite, but the vibe drops very fast… She will not want to talk much, It may force me to come across very try hard on a sinking ship. Even ,in the best case, if im lucky enough to get a flakey number, chances are very low that she will see me again.
Where should I send these videos links?.. I will upload them tonight
[heartiste: go to the about page and email them.]
LikeLike
It is interesting concept and something I have been experimenting myself with for the last couple of weeks.
I am mainly direct game guy, but I also noticed that same women will give better reaction for a better calibrated opener, and so in few last weeks I started trying to engage her reaction and based on it deciding what to do.
I don’t really change to indirect, but rather ground my direct opener more than I would usually do.
Like if she has that “who is this guy and what he wants?” look, I don’t really go for indirect, but I ground my opener and do the whole “I know it sounds random…” or “It is actually interesting, but…”, if however, her initial reaction is good than I will just go for direct without much of the grounding.
LikeLike
Could we have a full post on what really happened with the Ohio school shooting?
I don’t care so much if the moral of the story is not to bully anyone.
I do care if the moral of the story is not to take anyone else’s gf away from him. 😉
LikeLike
[…] recently was reading the notorious blog of Heartiste and bumped into the same debate that’s been going on for ages… ‘Direct VS […]
LikeLike
I’ll indulge your inquiry into what works for good-looking men.
As a stunner, breeding stud, I say going direct has always worked best for me. Actually, the more ridiculous and unlikely situation, the better.
LikeLike
Heartiste,
This is an excellent post. I appreciate the discussion of actually techniques that we all do whether we do it on purpose or naturally.
We at the New York Pick-up Lair would really love for your to break down the Justin Wayne video that you said you will consider. Infields videos are always a great way to see what really happens in real life.
I think he posted it here:
what are your thoughts on the tester.. or his navigational approach… is he considered average for real?
LikeLike
[…] https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/02/24/direct-vs-indirect-street-game/ […]
LikeLike