• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Another Game Concept Validated: Personality Is Adjustable
The Feminism Shit Test »

Women’s Unrealistic Online Standards Are Like Ice Cream

April 12, 2012 by CH

A reader claims to note a trend in online personals:

[T]his is a trend I’ve noticed online, women who are QUITE comfortable with dating someone a handful of years younger but do NOT want anyone more than a few years older than they. What accounts for this trend? I mean, you could meet a 28 year old fat dude, or a 40 year old paleo-hardened guy who looks young. Why pre-emptively discount age like that? Most women I’ve met prefer someone same age or older.

I don’t know how widespread women’s aping of men’s standards in online ads is, because I don’t do online dating (at least not recently). However, from what I’ve read about the subject, most women’s preferences in online ads is for men older than they are; which makes sense, since age is a status marker for men in a way it isn’t for women. But assuming for the sake of argument that there is a small but growing contingent of cougars explicitly seeking younger men in what amounts to a mirror image of the universal trend for men to seek younger women, I believe I have an explanation.

First, keep in mind that it doesn’t matter what women demand in online ads, because outrageous standards that are far removed from reality are quickly weeded out of contention, leaving such delusional women sad and alone in real life. A lot of loser women who do the online thing subconsciously know they aren’t going to get laid by the man of their dreams, so they throw all reason and sobriety to the wind and just go hog wild laundry listing their fantasy criteria. For these women (admittedly greater in number now than every before in Western history), it’s more about ego catharsis than about actually meeting a man. ASCII therapy with a public audience of like-minded Medusas one-upping each other to the top of the entitlement heap.

Happily punching in a feverish list of ridiculous expectations in an online ad is the emotional equivalent of plopping in front of the TV (all shows cater to women except ‘Mythbusters’ and sports) and wolfing down a tub of ice cream. Feels SOOOOO good, even if it’s SOOOO bad for her health, looks and love life. Kinda makes a tidy little metaphor for civilizational decline.

Second, the few cougars who aren’t ugly, ragged or grossly obese but who left their prime years far behind in a haze of drunken binges and cock hopping, will sometimes recognize, on a primal level, that their odds of getting a good (read: high value, sort of charmingly dickish) man of the type they pined for at age 20 to commit to them in a loving long-term relationship are very low, and that their efforts are best spent putting out for horny younger men who will at least offer a short term thrill in the sack. This phenomenon — of older woman transforming into clitorally turgid quasi-men — is not common, certainly not nearly as common as the media would have you believe. But they do exist, and you can be pretty sure that most of them could cut glass with their jaws and suffocate small dogs with their jungly, frosted pube patches. Do note, as well, that as women age their testosterone levels rise in step with their lowered expectations, making the prospect of loveless one night stands more palatable to their still feminine egos.

Let’s just say that these horncat cougars are not exactly the sorts of women older men with options want at all, and they aren’t the sorts of women younger men with no options want for more than a few no muss no fuss bangs in which to drain their aching teen balls. Because younger men, just like older men, prefer the exquisite intimacies of young women. Cougars probably know this on some deep supraegotistical level, so they respond to their constrained sexual market choices by pretending to prefer the company of younger men when in reality all they’re trying to do is avoid the soul crushing loneliness that would inevitably result if they adhered to the standards of their real desires and had to face the brutal and merciless cruelty of the sexual market head on.

Women never really lose the ability to extrapolate a one night stand into some fantastical dramatic relationship story arc, so a cougar having a couple of perfunctory fucks with an indiscriminately horny college student in a dating slump can sometimes mean the difference for her between having the will to live for another day and resigning herself to gardening and obesity. It’s not an avenue most older single women are willing to take, but for a few desperate specimens with male-like sex drives and bodies that haven’t yet gone completely to shit, it beats suddenly and unceremoniously being dumped into the invisible fringes of forgotten wastelands. At least for a few more years.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Escape, Girls, Hitting The Wall, Pretty Lies, Ridiculousness | 72 Comments

72 Responses

  1. on April 12, 2012 at 6:21 pm Tony D

    I’m 34 and can walk into any bar and makeout with a 21 year old in thirty minutes, but I can’t even get a young girl to reply to my witty pof messages because I’m too old. And cougars? Who wants them?

    LikeLike


    • on April 12, 2012 at 11:27 pm Anonymous

      Roosh tweet the other day:

      “When older women go for younger guys, everyone says “You go girl!”.

      But when an older GUY goes for a younger chick, people say “What a creep”

      LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 1:28 am Anon

        “Everyone” means the degenerate feminazi-infiltrated leftstream media.
        Common folks know on some level that there’s a disconnection somewhere.

        But yeah, only the red pill can make you see things with clarity.

        LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 1:18 pm ksn

        Yeah most “normal” folk view such behavior as odd at best.

        LikeLike


    • on April 13, 2012 at 2:22 am Anonymous

      Yes, for the older male, going online is the last thing he wants to do because he’s disadvantaged there even if he lies about his age which he must do there.

      In real life, things are entirely different for him and for the better.

      For the older woman, going online is the first thing she wants to do because she’s more advantaged there. But sooner or later she has to meet guys in real life.

      LikeLike


  2. on April 12, 2012 at 6:47 pm Rick Derris

    I must agree with the reader who submitted the message on this trend. Take a look at online dating sites and you’ll definitely see that the c*nts are extended the lower age limit down. It’s quite prevalent to see the cougar whorebags looking for guys 10+ years younger, but even “regular” women seem to have a trend where they’re after guys within the range of 3-5 years younger than them and 5-7 years older.

    Tony D’s experience really is the norm for online dating. The younger bitches will ignore quite a bit of the messages and you’ll get tons of messages from 1-5 level hogs. It’s a complete waste of time.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on April 12, 2012 at 11:56 pm Anonymous

      There was a thread of comments a few weeks ago on this. Older men, younger women. Somebody said, could have been CH, that the most important thing to make it happen on a regular basis with younger girls is preselection by the younger girl’s social circle. If I understood it correctly, if her friends seem to “approve” of you, and/or you’re already seen to be attractive to another young girl she sees.

      I’ve got to believe anything is possible. Surely until age 45 as a man, at least, with 18-21 chicks.

      Certainly your competition – younger guys — become more clownish each passing year. Look at younger guys these days, they are unemployed toolboxes. Sure, a select few will discover game and develop into solid men. But on the whole, you’ve got a generation of truly loser guys – the girls have more education, and more money. How much attraction could there be?

      Do younger chicks really take this generation of younger guys seriously? Its hard for me to believe.

      An older guy brings so much more to the table

      Hard to believe these younger girls will not stray more and more for the few, select higher status guys in their periphery. And AGE is a marker of high status to a younger girl.

      Now whether or not a particular younger chick gets this message about you, that you’re worth taking a chance on her, this is the hard part, I think.
      You have to make it happen

      LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 1:22 pm ksn

        Let’s not confuse credentialism for real education. I have two degrees and can tell you college s a joke. The only valuable skill girls are learning is how not to gag when.goblin cock.

        LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 6:05 pm Anonymous

        True. Credentialism- which means girls are outearning guys. Girls are now the bread winners largely, the statistics confirm it.

        They are gobbling cock – but only for the same few Alphas on the 20s carousel. 90% of guys (?) are getting none of it. Then, at age 30, these girls look for a beta sucker

        LikeLike


  3. on April 12, 2012 at 6:53 pm Samuel

    They do it because they have not quit lying to themselves yet.

    They do it because they don’t know what the hell they want.

    They do it because nasty dudes 25 yrs older than them hit them up and they do not want to encourage that, and have not considered that some of that demographic of men might actually be great

    They do it because they know that older dudes will contact them anyway, the ones with balls, so its an Alpha screen shit-test.

    Just a thought.

    LikeLike


    • on April 13, 2012 at 12:12 am xsplat

      “They do it because they know that older dudes will contact them anyway, the ones with balls, so its an Alpha screen shit-test. ”

      I like this one.

      In SE Asia it’s more common to date much younger girls, however a mid forties guy is testing tensile limits if he aims to pull a 21 year old.

      Absolutely ignore what the girl says she wants. How would she know anyway? She’s never even met your marvelous self. And the cost of a message is cheap.

      Also, lie about your age.

      LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 4:33 am Libertardian

        Agree. OTOH, when a site mistakenly shows me profiles of lesbians and their headlines shriek “NO MEN!” I tend to believe them out of fear of perforated eardrums should I add to their rage.

        Some sites actually let chicks enforce their shit lists (i.e. if you’re outside her demanded age range you can’t send her a message). This is about as bright as telling your toddler it’s okay for him to play with his own dumps. And somehow, hacking the site to send a message anyway just doesn’t seem as alpha.

        I have this sick fetish for girls I can actually have a conversation with, so a smart 25yo is about as young as I’d want to go. I can’t screw every 20 minutes any more and meanwhile what do you talk to an 18yo about?

        LikeLike


  4. on April 12, 2012 at 6:55 pm GeishaKate

    It really isn’t all that dire.

    [heartiste: now where is the poetry in that, i ask you?]

    LikeLike


    • on April 12, 2012 at 7:26 pm Anon

      You’re a 7.
      You can make it to 8 if you flash them titties.

      LikeLike


      • on April 12, 2012 at 8:08 pm GeishaKate

        I could, but you haven’t factored in my buck tooth 😉

        LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 12:06 pm Fred Rotten

        Well played, GK… well played, indeed.

        LikeLike


      • on April 12, 2012 at 8:48 pm Robb

        Without the hair, she looks like Jim Carey.

        LikeLike


      • on April 12, 2012 at 8:52 pm tois95

        omg wtf, thats 1.5 on my scale, mate.

        LikeLike


      • on April 12, 2012 at 9:00 pm driveallnight

        Her appetite for Drop Out makes her a rock-solid 9.5

        LikeLike


      • on April 14, 2012 at 3:23 pm Greg Eliot

        Lose the smug grin of entitlement… turns a 7 into a 5.

        LikeLike


    • on April 12, 2012 at 8:13 pm GeishaKate

      good point

      LikeLike


    • on April 13, 2012 at 1:02 pm King A (Matthew King)

      A woman posting her pic down here in the commentration camp = fearless. Standing O for you. And: brace yourself.

      This will be a good experiment in personality attraction. (“Her appetite for Drop Out makes her a rock-solid 9.5.” [WTF is Drop Out?]) Heartiste thinks factors other than physical makes up 5% of female attractiveness. I think it’s more around 40-50.

      Finally, in conclusion and in summary, tits or GTFO.

      Matt

      P.S. By “Fearless” I mean the album by Taylor Swift.

      LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 1:43 pm GeishaKate

        Stand down, Bossypants. I’m not your beck and Bacall girl. I’ve been here a few months now and this is my way of saying I’ve grown fond of you lot.

        P.S. Thanks for the O though 🙂

        [heartiste: the growing is mutual]

        LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 2:11 pm Fred Rotten

        @ GK

        (*looks in your direction, raises snifter glass, nods with a subtle grin*)

        LikeLike


      • on April 14, 2012 at 9:44 am King A (Matthew King)

        GeishaKate wrote: “Stand down, Bossypants.”

        Shirt up, Saggyblouse.

        LikeLike


  5. on April 12, 2012 at 6:56 pm Joe Eoj

    I’d have thought that the issue is that older men you find on dating sites are likely to be low quality than younger men. While any individual man may be higher quality at 40 than at 25, the average quality of single men drops dramatically over that period. The few high-quality 40-year-old super-bachelors out there have probably got their game refined to the point where they have no need to use dating sites. All you’re left with are the dregs and the divorcees. There’s only one George Clooney, and he doesn’t use okcupid.

    Also, for young women, being hit on by a low-quality older man just feels weird and creepy compared to being hit on by a low-quality man of your own age.

    [heartiste: that’s a legit point. but i’d expand it and note that men in general of all ages are likely to be lower quality on an online site (PUAs excepted!). anyhow, it’s mostly academic; like another commenter said, women may say one thing in an online ad, but when you meet them out in real life, they often act a very different way. cougars aren’t flying to online sites because it’s a bounty of acceptable dick; rather, they’re RETREATING to those sites because no one of any value pays them a single look in the real world.]

    LikeLike


    • on April 12, 2012 at 10:59 pm corvinus

      “There’s only one George Clooney, and he doesn’t use okcupid.”

      This says it all.

      LikeLike


  6. on April 12, 2012 at 7:02 pm Dave

    I’d guess most of these women have already been married once and divorced when the sex stopped. The sex probably stopped because the poor beta sap she married lost interest in porking an obnoxious cow. Chances are she doesn’t know why the sex stopped since no sane beta male would tell her, “Yes dear, I still like sex, but not with YOU”, so she chalked it up to sexual dysfunction on his part. Now that she’s collected his house and retirement she’s free to start a new sex life completely blind to her loss of market value.

    This is where delusional cougars come from.

    LikeLike


  7. on April 12, 2012 at 7:46 pm Laconophile

    TV shows are probably the most potent delusion fertilizer. Just look at some of the pairings featured in Glee: http://revoltagainst.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/glee-the-pinnacle-of-cultural-marxism-part-1/

    Add to mix Cougar Town and it’s like industrial strength hamster feed laced with steroids.

    LikeLike


    • on April 12, 2012 at 9:20 pm Mexican Pete

      Don’t forget Sex and the City, which persuaded countless middle-aged women that they can still win their super-alpha banker from the clutches of supermodels.

      Or that if they pursue Messalina-level promiscuity ’til their late fifties, they’ll still be desired by all men.

      Whoever wrote that rancid tripe must have hated women deeply.

      LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 4:09 am Libertardian

        “Whoever wrote that rancid tripe must have hated women deeply.”

        The book that started it was written by a woman, so, yeah.

        LikeLike


      • on April 15, 2012 at 4:54 pm sh1nk3n

        I’ve met Candace.

        That is one self-hating train-wreck of a person.

        I expect to read one day that she’s taken herself out.

        LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 11:06 am itsme

        it was written by gay guys, i think.

        LikeLike


    • on April 13, 2012 at 12:26 pm Fred Rotten

      Holy chit… Just read the ‘Glee’ link and I think I feel sick to my stomach. It’s SO gay (‘Glee’, not the post itself) that I think it just gave me cancer.

      I never realized that tv had sunk to this level. I mean, I *knew*, but maybe I just wasn’t ready to face it.

      I’m… I’m speechless. My… balls… have retracted. Something’s not right here…

      MUST… KILL… EVERYBODY IN GLEE.

      [heartiste: note to FBI and SPLC numbnuts who might be reading: this commenter is assuredly jesting.]

      LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 12:59 pm Laconophile

        It truly is the pinnacle of “Cultural Marxism” (cultural distortion, brought to you by the culture-distorters)

        There is also a part two, if you want to finish off what’s left of your balls:

        http://revoltagainst.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/glee-the-pinnacle-of-cultural-marxism-part-two/

        LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 4:54 pm Fred Rotten

        I should have heeded your warning, Laconophile. But I just couldn’t leave well enough alone, so I read part two. And now I have no balls. They’re gone… both of them. I look like a G.I. Joe.

        In all seriousness, though, I literally cannot wrap my head around what I’ve just read about Glee. It’s one of those things in which you become fully aware that your life was better—more innocent—before you knew about it.

        LikeLike


      • on April 15, 2012 at 1:37 pm P Ray

        Somebody has not read “The Petals Fall Twice”.
        That’s what you read to qualify your last line.

        LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 5:49 pm Libertardian

        I pay little attention to the simple amusements of the great unwashed, so yes that was an eye-opener. The ghost of Goebbels is smiling coldly.

        Though I am wholly on board with unrealistically attractive interracial lesbians.

        LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 2:21 pm Fred Rotten

        Thank you, CH. It’s a shame you actually have to say it.

        For the public record, I, Fred Rotten, wrote, “MUST… KILL… EVERYBODY IN GLEE” purely as a joke, with the sole intention of looking cool in front of my online peers. Thank you.

        LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 5:23 pm Laconophile

        I’m pretty sure Glee is a Protected Class. You can say KILL THE BOERS all you want though, you can even sing it.

        LikeLike


  8. on April 12, 2012 at 8:17 pm migsflecha

    A trend I noticed from a very brief visit to online sites.
    Many late 20 to mid 30 year old (sorry guys that’s my target age) women w/out children, said they loved their nephews/nieces, family life was important to them etc. a great day would be hanging w/ their brother’s kids and parents at a barbeque. I read that often enough to note the trend and
    TRANSLATION Ostensibly they were looking for a man, but not a lover nor a husband nor to start their own family, What they really wanted was -wait for it- a brother! to play with and chum w/ their sibling’s families.
    How sick is that?
    That explains to me why these still desirable women are single and visiting such sites. I am an old dog but I learned quick to stay away from both.

    LikeLike


    • on April 12, 2012 at 10:58 pm corvinus

      Undoubtedly related to that post several weeks ago wherein someone claimed women tend to use online dating sites to collect beta orbiters to stroke their egos.

      LikeLike


  9. on April 12, 2012 at 9:05 pm V

    I don’t think many women really know (consiously) what they want anyway, so why sweat it? Doesn’t heartiste say to ignore what most women say they want anyway?

    Probably these women have no clue what they really want anyway so maybe they are just throwing a bunch of guesses out there. They are playing the lotto and hoping to hit the jackpot.

    LikeLike


  10. on April 12, 2012 at 9:38 pm Firepower

    I don’t know how widespread women’s aping of men’s standards in online ads is

    Dewd – it’s huuuuuge.

    The babes’ problems arise from thinking they can write (n’ stuff!)

    Writing is a Man’s area of expertise. When girls try and mimic that casual grace (especially in sex-charged arenas) they lay an egg. It’s like the WNBA of the internets.

    LikeLike


  11. on April 12, 2012 at 9:44 pm Southern Man

    We “old dogs” should just avoid online dating completely; we NEVER get past the age prejudice with our targets (half our age plus seven). Meet out in the wild instead, impress them with your manly ways, game the hell out of them, disarm them with contrast, et cetera – you’ll get girls who wouldn’t give your online profile a second glance.

    LikeLike


  12. on April 12, 2012 at 9:48 pm Harcourt Mudd

    I am the reader who posted the comment that’s the subject of discussion here. Let me elaborate a bit more. Not all of the women posting these age ranges are themselves worn-out cougars. I’ve been surprised by the women who are mid-20s who are (ostensibly) cool with dating a younger man, and draw some kind of hard line a mere 4 years away from their own age. In real life, I’ve met girls that don’t care but I have met some that do, even for someone like me who looks really young. I have not done much online dating of late because it’s been unnecessary and wastes time and you meet women who, sometimes are cute, but have strange issues beyond even the barsluts you meet out when approaching IRL.

    [heartiste: i haven’t seen any trend like this in real life, but i can’t speak for online since i dont do that. i wouldn’t worry about it. most chicks drop their criteria in a real world context.]

    LikeLike


    • on April 13, 2012 at 8:13 am GeishaKate

      I have a personal theory about this. I don’t necessarily think that women are drawn to older or younger men exactly so much as they are drawn to men “of a certain age,” which in this case is somewhere between 25 and 40. So, if a woman is older than 25, she appears to like younger men, and if she is younger than 40 she appears to like older men, when if fact, it is just an age range that is attractive, much like you men have your own preferred age range.

      [heartiste: nah. single women in their 30s routinely date upper 40s and 50s men. happens all the time. sex ratio explains some of it. desire for older men explains some. through family, i know a couple divorced dudes in their late 50s who are dating women in their early 30s. marrying? no. but dating and fucking? yes. and that’s all that matters to men, particularly men of that age who don’t want to go through the wringer again.]

      LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 2:47 pm Anon

        “much like you men have your own preferred age range”

        Yep. 16 to 20.

        But most of the time, we have to settle for 21.

        LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 2:54 pm GeishaKate

        lol

        LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 5:28 pm Just a Girl

        Easier to get ’em drunk.

        LikeLike


      • on April 24, 2012 at 12:09 am S. M. Sullivan

        Cougars may be dating younger men not as a reflection of preference for them, but simply because younger men are more likely to be unattached than older men.
        Most people will take what they can get.

        LikeLike


  13. on April 12, 2012 at 10:09 pm bob

    Here is a “laundry list” from Plenty Of Fish: 57 items long! (and rumor has it she’s fat, too.)

    http://www.happybachelorsforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=15377#p114556

    LikeLike


  14. on April 13, 2012 at 12:18 am Doc

    Online dating is non-sense since women always put down what doesn’t interest them in the least, and will not admit to themselves what gets their juices flowing. This is why meeting women in person is the key – they have no control over what they find attractive. As a man pushing 50 I regularly hit it with the 18-25 year olds.

    Online – I doubt any would respond. In person, they end up in my bed, of course they are usually playing the “good girl” with the idiots their own age who still follow them around hoping to get some. They never will, because it’s guys like me that are keeping those little girls happy.

    LikeLike


  15. on April 13, 2012 at 5:21 am Anonymous

    “…it’s more about ego catharsis than about actually meeting a man. ASCII therapy with a public audience of like-minded Medusas one-upping each other to the top of the entitlement heap.”

    Correct. And this applies across the board for ALL women, of all SMV and varying demographics who engage in online dating.

    For women, online dating is essentially an infinite supply of positive ego stroking. An on-demand array of dynamic ASCII content customized in response to a projected description of her desires and can be perpetuated and regenerated by her at will. An overwhelming amount of instant attention and validation is standing by at her fingertips. It’s better than ice cream, and even more unhealthy. It only compounds the delusional entitlement she already has sending her inner hypergamous reactor closer to melt down.

    I use online game to suppliment my cold approach rotation prospects. Aware that I’m showing no modesty here: I’m exceptional at it. I expend very little time and effort with a very high success rate and quality yield. Although online game will never hold a candle to cold approach PU/seduction, IMO the correct combination of both creates an abundance of consistent pussy and adapts nicely for a working professional.

    For insecure women of avg SMV (~6 & ~7 particularly) they mend their weak ego by taking advantage of beta men by the dozen for free dinners, drinks and attention. They literally line up dates, one after another, week after week while chasing and/or cock carouselling alphas during the same time frame.

    Why?
    1) makes them “feel better”
    2) beta men enable it, so they can
    3) low risk of social network discovering her polyamory

    Body type = average. heh.

    LikeLike


    • on April 13, 2012 at 11:23 am GeishaKate

      I’ve encountered a lot of women who have used men thus (they may not even feel they are “using” them) and am glad to see I’m not the only one who finds it morally repugnant. This circular dating seems only to exist to fill a void in their lives that would be better addressed with personal or spiritual growth.

      LikeLike


      • on April 15, 2012 at 1:32 pm P Ray

        Start a relationship honest and it’s happier for both parties.
        Why is that so hard for many people? Oh yeah … it’s because honesty is either devalued or used as a weapon.

        LikeLike


    • on April 14, 2012 at 9:51 pm blogster

      and lets not forget faceook, which allows women the socially acceptable shield of general social networking and communication to cultivate a harem of pathetic beta orbiters who she can systematically pump for ego and self assurance with complete plausible deniability.

      women don’t even have to go through the motions of ‘dating’ anymore.

      LikeLike


  16. on April 13, 2012 at 10:29 am Maya

    “Feels SOOOOO good, even if it’s SOOOO bad for her health, looks and love life.”

    Same could be said for your blog … 😦

    [heartiste: incorrect. this blog will improve your life love if you will open your mind to it. (and probably your looks and health too) instead, you want to believe the sexual market doesn’t exist, or that it follows feminist law. the betas of the world — and they are in the great majority — often do toe the feminist line — getting married to aging crones and settling for has-beens who will always dream of the alpha cock of their youth — are proof positive that a sexual market drapes over humanity like a mold. you need look no further than men who have options — such as famous actors — to see how quickly and efficiently they sort by older man-much younger woman pairings.
    now for you, i’d suggest you get your cherry popped pronto. because a virgin at your age has no idea how the real world works. you see everything through virgin colored glasses, and that is why you are alone.]

    LikeLike


    • on April 13, 2012 at 3:16 pm Maya

      “instead, you want to believe the sexual market doesn’t exist, or that it follows feminist law.”

      Me? No.

      [heartiste: yes]

      “now for you, i’d suggest you get your cherry popped pronto. because a virgin at your age has no idea how the real world works. you see everything through virgin colored glasses, and that is why you are alone.”

      That’s a very bad advice. You really think I’d be happier if I just had sex pronto,

      [yes]

      most likely with some random uninspiring man?

      [have you given serious thought to what you bring to the table?]

      I think it’s way more important to first find someone who will make me feel safe.

      [safe men tend to be uninspiring men. unless you are a 10, you will have to pare back your demands to a more realistic level.]

      As a sex addict you’re probably unable to understand what I’m talking about.

      [no such thing as sex addiction. but please do go on and tell the world about all the alpha males you know who happily and freely chose to marry aging frumps. for the sarcasm-impaired: there is little chance in hell maya has very many alpha males in her social circle.]

      LikeLike


      • on April 13, 2012 at 3:59 pm Maya

        Where did I say that I believe that sexual marketplace follows the feminist laws?! Where did I say that alpha males want to marry aging frumps?!

        “[have you given serious thought to what you bring to the table?]”

        yes.

        LikeLike


    • on April 13, 2012 at 5:30 pm Just a Girl

      Hartists, would you mind explaining why you’re advising a woman to go out and find sex asap? Wouldn’t that just lower her value by raising her partner count?

      [heartiste: the hit to an older virgin’s value from raising her partner count to 1 is less than the hit to her value from losing all perspective.]

      LikeLike


      • on April 15, 2012 at 1:00 pm Maya

        I can’t imagine having sex without emotions. Impossible. You think I should try it anyway? What if I change my mind in the middle of having sex and then accuse the poor guy that he raped me?!

        LikeLike


      • on April 15, 2012 at 1:28 pm P Ray

        You’re a fast learner, Maya.
        Being around guys you’re not attracted to makes women learn and achieve faster.
        So you can be with the top one.
        (But that’s only possible if he’ll have you though) 🙂

        LikeLike


  17. on April 13, 2012 at 12:15 pm Rollo Tomassi

    First, keep in mind that it doesn’t matter what women demand in online ads, because outrageous standards that are far removed from reality are quickly weeded out of contention, leaving such delusional women sad and alone in real life.

    Don’t forget gentlemen, when it comes to online dating, women are all looking for their Prince.

    https://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2011/12/14/qualities-of-the-prince/

    LikeLike


    • on April 13, 2012 at 7:13 pm Fred Rotten

      @ Rollo Tomassi

      Your “Qualities of the Prince” is a great post. For those who haven’t read it yet, check it out.

      LikeLike


  18. on April 13, 2012 at 1:30 pm Dr. Zoidberg

    As a sligthly older male (32) I’ve only had great success with online dating to find younger women. If a college girl is searching online, it is because she is seeking better, more alpha dudes than she finds at university and frat parties. Even if her profile puts a maximum age, good writing/email and a hamster turning profile takes care of that. I just recently nabbed a 22 year old even after she gave me the old “my father wouldn’t approve of me seeing a man 10 years my senior” test.

    As one poster said, the effort to success ratio online is astounding if you know what you are doing.

    LikeLike


  19. on April 13, 2012 at 1:30 pm Rick Derris

    I had to come back to this thread.

    I’d actively DISCOURAGE guys from doing online dating. You’re at a huge disadvantage because every woman gets hundreds of emails. It’ll be nearly impossible to stand out. I know “looks don’t matter” but all the bitches generally see is your picture with your email message, so unless both are spot-on, your message is getting trashed. Getting turned down by 6-7s on this thing will really discourage a guy and losing confidence like that is NOT something that a person should have to go through.

    I’ve only received one response from 23-25 year olds when the age topic came up: “so?” You’re NOT going to get that online.

    LikeLike


  20. on April 13, 2012 at 1:54 pm walawala

    I put out an online ad. A 28 year old local Hong Kong girl responded. In my ad I said I wanted someone 26-32. She was a dancer, but from her photos, only ok, great body.

    She immedately starts with the “I want to meet someone who will marry me, be my partner.”

    I play it cool. “With the right person anything can happen.”

    We chat, she asks my age. I say “64….but I’m well preserved”.

    She doesn’t see the irony and says you’re too old.

    Then I chide her saying I was hoping to meet someone real online not someone superficial. I say my age is 39.

    She’s suddenly all over this.

    We chit chat…I move this conversation to a sexual realm. “Some girls really want to meet me….”

    This raises the buying temperature. Suddenly this “Sweet innocent ballerina” writes:

    “I have a rubber cock”

    Me: Big deal, I have a real one…

    In the end, I could sense that this was a shit test or something off. So I escalated to the point where I said “Get waxed or we don’t meet”.

    She goes from “rubber cock” to suddenly not being online.

    Moral of the story…when it’s online, I go totally hardcore to test to see if a girl is as real as she claims….if she disappears great.

    I’ve banged more chicks by meeting them online just by being totally upfront before we meet about what I want sexually and how I would expect them to act.

    LikeLike


  21. on April 13, 2012 at 4:45 pm DerHahn

    FWIW I’ve noticed something like this on my profile at match. I would consistently get messages from women up to five years older than me.

    LikeLike


  22. on April 15, 2012 at 8:25 am Ben Willard

    One thing is for sure – 95% of all the unsolicited messages you’ll get from women on these sites are from 56 year-old tattooed grandmothers or grossly obese landwhales. Almost a waste of time reading them (but I enjoy the comedy value). When it comes to unrealistic standards, this one girl’s profile was looking for a guy who was “tall, dark, athletic, very good-looking, sexy, successful and confident” but who was also “not big-headed or full of himself”. Yeah, good luck finding that combination, baby. Not that I haven’t made mistakes, of course:

    http://backinthefield.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/standard-operational-procedure.html

    LikeLike


  23. on April 18, 2012 at 8:04 pm Vicus

    `m a mature Argentine, where national sport i`snt futbol (soccer) but atraque (game) , since kindergarten it ist all i new, BTW for both gender. and the dammed word “macho” another manning ist. i`ts mean all fantasys and womans desire… the old and “dirty” word macho mean the same like “Alpha”. when woman say… he is a macho, it si the greates value proof for man, and she mine that way … Everyone nows “femme fatal”, fewer nows “l`homme fatal”…he is a blank “projection” on the Theater screen woman`s gina tingles…im sudamerica an 60 yo with 18 yo hottys are new from last milennia…BTW ” MAN says… there is no Man until 30yo…everything under that age are boys…”

    LikeLike


  24. on April 19, 2012 at 3:22 am Linkage is Good for You: Week of April 15, 2012

    […] – “Another Game Concept Validated: Personality is Adjustable“, “Women’s Unrealistic Online Standards Are Like Ice Cream“, “The Numbers Game Fallacy”Danny from 504 – “Sicilian Girl […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Amon Ra on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Ron on Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat C…
    Gershom on The Confound Of Silence
    Mabui on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    cortesar on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Manifest Depravity
    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: