This video of a prankster who pretended to be a generic famous dude has been making the rounds on pickup oriented blogs. And with good reason. It demonstrates how preselection and manipulated perception — two core game concepts — are effective at attracting women (and attracting them for dates, which you can see proved at the end of the video when our intrepid fake celebrity calls a girl and she throws herself at him.)
Basically, the guy had a few friends follow him around the mall, one guy filming him and the other two guys (I can’t tell if any of his hired guns were women) acting as his “groupies” or entourage. He goes around identifying himself as “Thomas Elliot” when people, mostly women, ask him his name. Eventually, he begins to pile up admiring and gawking female attention, which only snowballs into more female attention. Apparently, not one of these starstruck chicks thought to question if Thomas Elliot was a real celebrity. That’s the power of preselection and fame; so powerful, it can disengage a woman’s neural logic circuitry.
Fame, as noted in the Dating Market Value Test for Men at the top of this blog, is the most powerful male attractiveness trait known to mankind. Fame trumps looks, wealth and game in its ability to draw in and captivate women from all social and racial strata. Preselection is a scientifically validated game concept — studies have shown that female geese will prefer the male goose surrounded by cardboard cut-outs of other female geese over the solitary males — which rests on the theory that women are attracted to men who are themselves attractive to other women, because such men have already been “preselected” by competitor women and are thus proven commodities.
(Preselection works for men, but not women, because men can size up a woman’s sexual market value with an instant look, while women need much more information to adequately assess a man’s SMV.)
When you put preselection and fame together, you get an explosion of pussy juice, like a dam bursting to release years of pent-up tributary tingles. “Thomas Elliot” was able to induce raw, animal desire in women simply by having himself filmed in the company of admirers and ACTING like someone famous and beloved by the ladies. This could be a new game tactic for men who wish to experiment with the cutting edge in seduction technology: have your wingman film you at the bars signing fake autographs.
***
Related to this post’s subject, here is a study which confirms the game concept of fluid perception.
UCLA anthropologists asked hundreds of Americans to guess the size and muscularity of four men based solely on photographs of their hands holding a range of easily recognizable objects, including handguns.
The research, which publishes today in the scholarly journal PLoS ONE, confirms what scrawny thugs have long known: Brandishing a weapon makes a man appear bigger and stronger than he would otherwise.
“There’s nothing about the knowledge that gun powder makes lead bullets fly through the air at damage-causing speeds that should make you think that a gun-bearer is bigger or stronger, yet you do,” said Daniel Fessler, the lead author of the study and an associate professor of anthropology at UCLA.
Researchers say the findings suggest an unconscious mental mechanism that gauges a potential adversary and then translates the magnitude of that threat into the same dimensions used by animals to size up their adversaries: size and strength.
Some of you are probably asking, “What does this have to do with game?” Ah, a lot, my friends. This experiment proves that human perception of certain characteristics can be influenced by specific, unrelated cues or behaviors. In this case, holding a gun influenced viewers to perceive the holder as physically bigger than he would normally be perceived. A gun (aka game) shifted the perceptions (attraction) of people (women) to view the subject as more physically imposing (desirable) than they would normally view the subject, even though the gun (game) did not add any physical size (objective conventional status) to the subject (PUA).
If brandishing a gun can alter perceptions so that you seem bigger to people than you really are, then it’s no stretch to conclude that adopting alpha male body language, qualifying girls, dressing stylishly and acting charmingly aloof can alter the perceptions of women to think you are more desirable than you would otherwise seem as just another beta face in the crowd.
The concept of perception fluidity is crucial to game theory, for much of seduction is the psychology of massaging women’s perceptions via manipulation of your identity, behavior and image to project the aura of alpha maleness which is so alluring to the warier sex.
‘Cause he was lean, mean, big and bad, Lord, pointing that gun at me.
LikeLike
Guns are often illegal in bars, so I will rock my tool belt 24/7 and report back. The second best object in the study was a drill.
LikeLike
The Fame thing very interesting- “Entourage” was kind of a riff on that as well. Makes me wonder how and why fame tickles the hindbrain more than strength, wealth, or social or personality dominance. Keeping in mind that hypergamy evolved as an attraction/submission to the dominant chimp or early hominid in the pack (strength, dominance) and fame of the modern, mass-media kind is a development literally the blink of an eye in the past- and there are many famous male specimens who would literally not be given a second look by most women if they weren’t famous. What gives?
LikeLike
In a flock, the individual “everyone else” gives the most attention, is the alpha. Anything that gets others in the immediate surroundings to pay attention to you, therefore boosts your alphatude. Fame currently does this.
LikeLike
> Makes me wonder how and why fame tickles the hindbrain more than strength, wealth, or social or personality dominance.
Well, under ancestral conditions, these were all pretty much the same thing. You lived in a community of tens or hundreds where some dudes mattered and some dudes didn’t. Wealth was the same as dominance, because there wasn’t that much stuff to own and it was all owned by the head dudes. Dominance was the same as fame, because everybody knows the head dudes. Strength was not *quite* the same as dominance, but pretty close, since in a world with few rules it’s hard for anyone to be dominant except the guy who can beat the other guy in a fight.
LikeLike
Another point is that we are programmed for groups of 150 people. 2-3 guys following someone is fame to our hindbrain, even in a world of 7 Billion.
LikeLike
Hunter gatherer tribes were actually composed of fewer than 50 I believe.
LikeLike
That video is like a real world cheat code…there was a code for Vice City where Tony Vercitti would have every female he encounters in the game follow him around.
LikeLike
Yeah, but the video doesn’t show how they set up the trick. They just show its aftermath. How exactly did they gain the initial attention? Two dudes and a camera?
LikeLike
Yeah, the video just shows it look like a group of 4 normal guys walking in a mall, with some random behind them filming. How did they get security first of all? Second, wouldn’t you need to buy something when shutting down a store? Third, most malls will kick you out for having any sort of camera device if it’s not arranged ahead of time.
LikeLike
“Third, most malls will kick you out for having any sort of camera device if it’s not arranged ahead of time.”
You don’t understand. If you are a CELEBRITY (even if faked) the rules do NOT apply to YOU, of course.
I once saw this process in operation where it actually had one of its rare failures (AFAIK). Check in at LAX, woman in front of me was Japanese, but did not carry a passport. Wanted to fly to Guam. Trouble is US citizens can fly passport-free from the 50 states to Guam, but not foreigners. She somehow got the point across (this was pre-2001) that she was a celebrity of some kind (I wouldn’t know, she was a singer). But the check-in clerk refused, “I can check you through to Honolulu, but not any further”. Apparently, she flew to Honolulu, and I think (maybe wrongly) that she got stuck there.
Thor
LikeLike
unrelated but worthy of your consideration
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/23/dove-the-ad-makeover_n_1446250.html?ref=women&ir=Women&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009
LikeLike
Oh noez!! Only 4% of women feel they are beautiful! This needs to be fixed.
I also heard that even less men feel they are rich & famous. That needs to be fixed too.
LikeLike
Ha ha.
I find myself often reminding women that math isn’t an emotion. It really frustrates them.
LikeLike
This could be a new game tactic for men who wish to experiment with the cutting edge in seduction technology: have your wingman film you at the bars signing fake autographs.
This would be hilarious, but dangerous because some lawyercunt would gladly pop out a false rape claim when she finds out the guy she banged was some ordinary beta.
LikeLike
Two things.
It’s highly doubtful that some beta schlub could pull it off without screwing it up the moment security showed up, much less even have the balls to do it in the first place.
Lastly, if you’re living your life afraid that someone will disapprove of your actions, look in a mirror, slap your face while saying out loud in the best deep male voice your weakness can muster, “I’m supposed to be a man. I will quit cringing at shadows and live my life as it’s meant to be.” Rinse, lather, repeat.
If you’re a woman, just go away.
LikeLike
That’s right. It takes living on the edge of danger to be perceived as a man with edge.
Ideally we could fake it, and have a simple cushy risk free life, while at the same time attracting bad boy attention.
But people are perceptive. Your body language follows from your inner beliefs and your past actions. It’s an organic whole. If you are worried about pissing off the sisterhood, the sisterhood will not want to fuck you.
LikeLike
“That’s the power of preselection and fame; so powerful, it can disengage a woman’s neural logic circuitry.” A stiff breeze can turn off a woman’s neural logic circuitry. A real accomplishment would be being able to turn the damn thing on, and keep it on.
LikeLike
I believe it was Roosh who said “fame + game = the future of pickup.”
It’ll be interesting to see how players start harnessing the ‘net to gain local notoriety to raise their chances of successful pickups. It’s inevitable that it will happen.
LikeLike
If you think about it isn’t that what the popular kids do in high school? They know everyone and are known by everyone and through that fame they can get whatever they want. It’s really the same thing. Humans try to form social groups and try to make their social group the best social group everyone wants to be in, and just by being a member of that all exclusive social group you are granted success in life.
LikeLike
It goes to show that fame to women isn’t what men normally think fame is. If I see the Rolling Stones in person, I’ll think Wow, The Rolling Stones, because they’ve been a backdrop to popular culture for decades. But if someone tells me “Hey, that dude over there are is a rock star” & I haven’t heard of the dude in question they’re going to seem as uninteresting as any other dude. But women don’t appear to even need to be familiar with the famous person for Fame to count.
LikeLike
That was exactly what I was thinking. Fame itself, ergo, love letters to serial killers.
LikeLike
But if someone tells me “Hey, that dude over there are is a rock star” & I haven’t heard of the dude in question they’re going to seem as uninteresting as any other dude.
^ that, my friend is pure logic…
But women don’t appear to even need to be familiar with the famous person for Fame to count.
^ Women (specially young girls) are emotional beings and therefore more likely to let themselves get carried away with all the hype of the situation
LikeLike
At 2:20 in the video, two girls’ conversation runs like this:
“He’s like, so gorgeous.”
“We’re like, OMG!”
Really girls? Really?
Granted the guy is better looking than the average shmoe. But if this guy were to be at the mall Starbucks waiting for his Venti lattemochawhatever drink to be called, without his celebrity persona powering the hamsterwheel, would these same girls even look at him twice? Maybe a 1/2 second glance to do an instant face and style check. Then move on to gossiping with friends and charging up Daddy’s creditcard.
But now, he is “gorgeous”, worth interrupting a shopping trip and worthy of staring at, and OMG’ing over?
Come on now, girls.
Then again, it is what it is. Fame (or perception thereof) is by far the most potent of all DHVs.
Fame conveys pre-selection, wealth, security, peer validation and fantasy all in one.
I read somewhere than women who watch an actor on screen feel that they really have gotten a chance to know the man. They feel that they trust him and understand him as a person (even if he’s just playing a character far removed from his true persona).
They feel this way after just spending 2 hours in his presence (watching the movie) quickly moving through both the Attraction and Comfort Stages. So when such a girl meets this actor in real life, the only stage left is Seduction.
This is one of the many reasons why famous people can attract women at will. They are walking, talking Attraction and Comfort machines.
[heartiste: true. girls use the words “cute” and “gorgeous” as catch-all terms to describe any man who is alpha and desirable. cuteness not actually required.]
LikeLike
I had an argument with two middle aged women about whether Tiger Woods was really one of the best looking men in the world. He’s nice looking I conceded, but if he weren’t Tiger Woods and you saw him on the street, that’s about all you’d give him- good/unusual look, well built. They swore up and down he was truly one of the best looking men alive. I believe they believed it. That is fame makes women believe men are better looking. Does it work this way for men? I don’t think so; not nearly as well, anyway.
[heartiste: right, women’s perceptions of men’s looks are much more amenable to outside influence than are men’s perceptions of women’s looks. that’s why when women use the word “cute” to describe a guy they like, it could mean a million different things about him that they find attractive.]
LikeLike
I think it often works in the opposite direction. If I had to choose between and equally attractive unknown and a known starlet, I’d pick the unknown. A Paris Hilton look alike to me is much better than Paris Hilton herself. Kardashians? For what? The only reason I can think of is to cheat on them since their fame will work for you.
Now that I think about it, thats the reason. If you can get a celeb girlfriend, cheat on her. She will be busy and you will have options all day.
LikeLike
“Not nearly as well” is surely true, but I think fame clearly has an effect on men as well. While mere fame will never cause a man to be attracted to an ugly woman, I think that women who are already reasonably attractive can have their attractiveness enhanced by fame, or in a more local sense, by the fact that she is known to be regarded as attractive by others. Men will obsess over a given actress or model to a degree that is not justified by her objective beauty alone. It’s as though the fact that her beauty is known and recognized by others renders it more valuable as a prize.
LikeLike
An example please. And do not confuse fame for a handy reference. One reason men focus on a famous woman is because she is a common reference. Also do not confuse women who are famous for their beauty.
I do not seem men fainting for girl bands.
LikeLike
Let’s be clear: I didn’t claim men faint for girl bands, and I said that fame will never make an ugly woman attractive. What I claimed was that fame can make attractive women seem more outstanding than they are. You want me to parse out women who are famous for their beauty, but that’s exactly my point. There are women who (I would claim) obtain a reputation for being hot that exceeds the score they would get if evaluated objectively in a bar by people who had never seen or heard of them before. You want an example? Scarlett Johansson. Is she reasonably hot? Yes. Is she anywhere near as amazingly beautiful as people act like she is? I say no.
LikeLike
“…if this guy were to be at the mall Starbucks… without his celebrity persona powering the hamsterwheel, would these same girls even look at him twice?”
Yes they would. It would just require that he have the same attitude and use the same celebrity routine with some changes. Or, just strike up a conversation using whatever props are around. It won’t have the immediate impact of the entourage prank, but workable.
LikeLike
I disagree. Nothing tops the social proofing of fame.
A quick example: a guy I used to model with decided one day to pull a “Thomas Elliott” if you will. He put on a brown trench, light brown shades and walked through the mall haughtily, and by himself.
I’d say he even did it better, as girls would come up to *him* and inquire if he was a celebrity or not. And which answer do you think got him numbers?
On regular days, we catch looks, but nothing to te extent fame gets. Although strong inner and outer game is pretty much synonymous with celebrity.
LikeLike
“And which answer do you think got him numbers?”
Both? Because if he said, “No,” crazy bitches would just convince themselves that he was lying to protect his identity?
LikeLike
Did you even read and then digest what I wrote?
I wrote that the entourage vs. coffee shop wouldn’t have the same immediate impact, but it would still work depending on attitude.
LikeLike
lzozozlzozozol
here is howwsz i control da perfeptions and clear clubs of all the douchebag dudes and get rid of all the dueszz in da club lzozzl zlzozoozozozolzoz
THESE ARE NOT DA COCKAS YOU ARE LOOKIG FOR, MOVE ALONG!
LikeLike
This is actually “Frame Control” in action. You can do stuff like this to people (on a smaller scale), but it can be a pretty big mind-fuck the first few times you do it lol
LikeLike
I’ve posted this before but studies have shown that even animals as basal as fish demonstrate pre-selection.
There is a certain variety of fish in which females go for the males who are the most golden in color. However, have the palest fish in the group be surrounded by a few females and other females will chose him to mate with over the more golden, solitary fish.
Hard to believe but its true. Shows you how deeply wired pre-selection is.
LikeLike
“Apparently, not one of these starstruck chicks thought to question if Thomas Elliot was a real celebrity. That’s the power of preselection and fame; so powerful, it can disengage a woman’s neural logic circuitry.”
Neil Strauss had this happen one night. People mistook him for Moby. It might or might not have been because he exuded so much confidence, but that surely didn’t hurt.
Meanwhile…God, people depress me.
LikeLike
It appears our beloved Canadians are having issues with false accusations as well:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/04/20/bc-teacheraccused.html?cmp=rss
LikeLike
Tucker Max in his 2nd book, Assholes Finish First, noted that a man with the best GAME even if it was better than his still had to go out and meet women and seduce them. He stated that once a man gets a little fame then women will line up for the famous men instead of the usual men lining up for women which a man has to do even if he has the best GAME but no fame. He admitted that his friend Marco had more GAME, a bigger dick, and the looks that (American) women liked than he did in his 1st book, I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell.
LikeLike
lzozozlzoozlzozl yah he had sooo much game dat h buttehxted a girl and taped it in sectetrths wihout da girlsstsh contehent zlzolzolzo
also he lied about his heiaght zlzoozllzozo
i am gled you ahve a short, buttocking, sefcrteive taper of butthex hero tucker max who ryenemse iwth giodklans sax lzzololzllzolzolz
rnecoconservatism: why do jonah goldberg and charlotte allen and teh weekly standard hate on/ignore true heroes and classical marriage and men’s rights and shed love on Tucker Max who films butthex with girls without the girl’s consent? butthexx!! lozlzlzlzlzlz lzlz!! goldberg says we need more feminism & family killing! lzozl!
March 10, 2010 12:00 A.M.
Where Feminists Get It Right
Women civilize men. ’Nuff said.
The reason strikes me as fairly simple. Women civilize men. As a general rule, men will only be as civilized as female expectations and demands force them to be. “Liberate” men from those expectations, and Lord of the Flies logic kicks in. Liberate women from this barbarism, and male decency will soon follow.
–http://article.nationalreview.com/427383/where-feminists-get-it-right/jonah-goldberg
hahahahah! what goldberg is saying that is if his wife didn’t lay down the line, he would be a beasty man alpha male, smacking women around, as that is in in true, deep, neocon nature. lozllz! he admits it! and then he projects it on teh entire world as neocons do to justify their pre-emptive, illegal wars! lzozll!
What jonah goldberg forgets to mention is that women committed over 50,000,000 abortions/murders (by their choice alone) since the fiat class’s Roe vs. Wade, as well as the fact that women originate over 2/3 of all divorces. This si why the fiat necons love women, as women serve their destructive quest for power.
This is because divorce and abortion are huge neocon profit centers, which also serve to dehumanize humanity, kill the family, grow the STATE, and make them all suck on the fiat teat that Jonah Goldberg et al dangle from The National Review. lozzllz!
How come Jonah never talks about this:
This one-page site has more links about the brutal tyranny that a man can be subjected to once he enters the legal contract of marriage, and even more so after he has children. What was once the bedrock of society, and a solemn tradition that benefited both men and women equally, has quietly mutated under the evil tinkering of feminists, divorce lawyers, and leftists, into a shockingly unequal arrangement, where the man is officially a second-class citizen who is subjected to a myriad of sadistic risks. As a result, the word ‘marriage’ should not even be used, given the totality of changes that have made the arrangement all but unrecognizable compared to its intended ideals. Suicide rates of men undergoing divorce run as high as 20%, and all of us know a man who either committed suicide, or admits seriously considering it during the dehumanization he faced even though he wanted to preserve the union. Needless to say, this is a violation of the US Constitution on many levels, and is incompatible with the values of any supposedly advanced democracy that prides itself on freedom and liberty. There is effectively a tyrannical leftist shadow state operating within US borders but entirely outside the US constitution, which can subject a man to horrors more worthy of North Korea than the US, even if he did not want out of the marriage, did not want to be separated from his children, and did not want to lose job. Any unsuspecting man can be sucked into this shadow state.
And this:
http://weddedabyss.wordpress.com/
Before you take the plunge there are a few things about marriage that you need to be aware of. The institution of marriage as we know it is no more. It has undergone drastic changes in the last 50 years. What used to be a life long commitment, unbreakable barring the most severe circumstances, has been relegislated into something new entirely thanks to the lobbying efforts of radical feminists and the divorce industry. In trying to to make divorce “fail-safe” for homemaker / lower-earner spouses, the bad ones included, they have made marriage “unsafe” for virtually everyone else.
Marriage today is a temporary union of two individuals where the exit costs are highly asymmetrical. What does that mean? It means that upon the dissolution of the marriage, one spouse generally makes off like a bandit, while the other is pushed into a life of unending poverty, abridged civil rights, and being two paychecks away from arrears, contempt, and prison.
http://weddedabyss.wordpress.com/
Why doesn’t this bother Jonah: “4. Decriminalization of Adultery – Adultery is no longer a crime. However the failure to pay alimony to an adulterous spouse is. Go figure.”
How come Jonah & his neocon elites never stick up for the common man, who, btw, is dying on foreign shores for their unconstitutional, undeclared foreign wars?
he fundamental thing that everyone is missing is that the neocons are exalting beta males such as tucker max as alpha males, while ignoring the true alphas they send to foreign shores to die in their wars.
charlotte,
please allow me to draw your attention to usmc Corporal Jason L. Dunham.
http://www.jasonsmemorial.org/about.html
“On April 14, 2004, 3 days after Easter Sunday, Corporal Dunham was manning a checkpoint in Karabilah, Iraq, when an insurgent leapt from his car and began choking Corporal Dunham. A scuffle ensued as two Marines approached to help. Reportedly, the last words from Corporal Dunham were, “No, No. Watch his hand.” Suddenly, the insurgent dropped a grenade. Corporal Dunham took off his Kevlar helmet, dropped to the ground, and covered the explosive as best he could.
The blast seriously wounded all 3 Marines. Eight days later, Corporal Jason L. Dunham died at Bethesda Naval Hospital from wounds he received in the incident. He was 22. ”
now the funny thing is that to the neocons the greater hero is Tucker Max, even though true heroes such as jason et al. are dying in the neocons’ war.
Now our foxy Ms. Allen could have used the precious space in the Weekly Standard to give a shout out to a true American hero–Corporal Jason L. Dunham.
But instead, she regurgitates tucker’s lies and corporate PR, as douchebaggery makes aging neocon’s ginas tingle, while true american heroism leaves them dry:
“Tucker Max, 33, six feet tall, extrovertedly good-looking, and usually photographed latched to a girl, a bottle of booze, or a cheeseburger, is an honors graduate (in three years) of the University of Chicago. He has a law degree from Duke University, whose admissions committee was so impressed with his academic record that it awarded him an academic scholarship. . . Max is famous as a blogger (tuckermax.com), and his website is replete with stories like the ones above, all involving graphically rendered bedroom exploits (if your definition of bedroom includes vans, offices, and the great outdoors), massive quantities of alcohol, and copious vomiting. He is the author of several books, including The Definitive Book of Pickup Lines (2001, out of print but selling for close to $200 on Amazon), the 2006 blockbuster I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which spent more than 100 weeks on the New York Times bestseller list, and the forthcoming Assholes Finish First. Beer in Hell, a dramatization of some of his website yarns, became an indie movie hit in college towns last fall. ”
Tucker lies about his height & success & films buttsex without the woman’s consent, and thus the weekly standard exalts him, while rejecting and ignoring all those true heroes jumping on grenades in their war.
http://www.quotabletuckermax.com/
http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com/
LikeLike
Is there a party inside GBFM’s mind?
How high do you have to be to get in?
Thanks in advance.
LikeLike
Tucker Max is not a hero of mine, but when he states the truth, I’ll say he was telling the truth. The truth is we all knew even before Tucker Max said it that famous men or possibly rich or possibly powerful and certainly high status men have women line up for them rather than what happens to low status men who have none of these things. Low status men have to line up for women and women line for high status men is all I was saying. Tucker Max noted the difference in his lifestyle when he went from anonymity to fame. To be honest, I doubt I’d want to meet him as I wouldn’t trust him. It wouldn’t surprise me if the ruling elite set him up as a diversion and someone for the masses to emulate, I’ve spent time telling people not to worship Tucker Max, but rather to learn from his successes and mistakes. The rest of your comment was awesome though because it was so true
LikeLike
lzozozlzl
you’re missing the whole point fartknocker assclownz zlzozolzlzz zlzzolzo
women do not line up for rich, successful, powerful men
they line up for assocking douchebags who lie abouttheir height zlzlzopzoz and theier succtehetx zlzolzozozo
female execuitives publish and promote douchebags and assocking docuhebaggery
“conservative” women neonthconths women repatea the lies of the assockers and teh bullies and the liars in the weekly standadth zlzoozolz
dis is why the fed funded da feminsist moveement zlzoozozoz
lzozozlzol
yah and dat is why if you are a butthextexter who tapes buttehxt in secret with girlths without the girlthss conthent if you are a butthexter like tucker max who rhymes iwth goldman saxth lzlzolzozo den all da neooncz woemenz will adulate you in the neoconths weeklys standatdh and they will publish and promote you as da paprpagonz of manohhododoz lzozzzolozolzo for your buttcocking
did john wyane and clint eastwood buttcock?
no
and dat is why da neoeococnths ahd to egt rid of da classic western movie with brokebut butthexint mountain zlzolozozooz
lzozozozo
Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)
lzoozzlzlzlloz
today’z ujieveirsties are deisgned to debauch the culture alongside sda currencisiee lzozozo as they hire legions of feminists to detsory the great books for men deocnstruct THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEz lzozozol and destory them the moral soul of thou shalt not steal detsory manhood replace manhood with butthexting tucker max rhymes iwth godlamans sax butthexting tucker max feminsists do this
Openmarket.org reportsssszzz “University administrators are the equivalent of subprime mortgage brokers,” notes Facebook investor (and founder of Paypal) Peter Thiel, “selling you a story that you should go into debt massively, that it’s not a consumption decision, it’s an investment decision. Actually, no, it’s a bad consumption decision. . . Vast amounts of money are spent by American colleges on useless administrators and politically correct indoctrination. For many people, college no longer pays off as an investment.
Forbes.com reprots “For a consummately educated guy, Peter Thiel (paypal founder) is derisive about American colleges and universities. In his view they’ve become too politically correct (he and David Sacks argued as much in their 1997 book, The Diversity Myth), hobbling the hard sciences as well as the humanities. Schools have created a classic bubble, says Thiel: Inflation-adjusted spending on administration per student jumped 61% between 1993 and 2007, while the number of administrators per 100 students rose 39%, reports the Goldwater Institute. Student debt levels fill Thiel with disgust. “It is pretty much the only form of indentured servitude in the U.S.,” he says.
—http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2011/0214/features-peter-thiel-social-media-life-after-facebook_5.html
lzozozozlzozozzlzoz
de unievristy exists to butthex you with tsudent debt, butthex and ebernakify your wife in secrtely taped neocon assoccking sesstshions and deosul her and teach her how to kill babies, transfer assetstst from good men to da assoccking banksters zlzolzzooz and after she is asscocked and deosuled in cocllege da womenz will assock tehir husbandz in divocrce court and be wrrarded by bernakes wit alaimonies payments to fund future assocking sestshsinsossn zlozzzo dat dey were addickedt addickced addicketed 2 in oeeoclleege insetad of while deocnstructng great books for menz knowledges zlzozlzol
how da university works: feminism = debt & debauchery & divorce & Desecration machine/army lzozlzlzlzlzlgh weo
lzozlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzozllzlz
univeristies are at the tip (tit lzozlzlzoz) of our debt empire
over the past thirty years or so univeristies desouled women in prima noctae assocking sessins (some of tehm secretly taped iwthout thei girls conthent as the neocons like it best) and they sent the army forth to 1) transfer assetts form menz, 2) destory the family, 3) murder 50,000,000 unborn innocent souls, 4) hype and sell sub prime loans while wearing short skirts lzozlzlzlzllzlzlz 5) lure men into marriage iwth their coconpirators the ministers who front the legal system that does what no pimp would wever do–charge men for past use of a pussy lzolsoslslslslslslslslsls
the fembot army;s main corporate state job is to create debt debauchery destiutution debt divorce deconstruction and devastation lzozlzlzlz
and they have succeeded!! lzozlzlzlzlzlzl
today our debt deficit will be greater than the gnp!!!!1
the feminsimt movement cooinnded with the largest greatest increase of debt ever known to namankinds lzozlzlzlzl this is because womenz who stamp their little feet and bitch and complain and tranfer and destory welath and say “me me m em e more material welath for me me me me for my gina!!!! it’s for the children (even though women aborted/killed/vacuumed 50,000,000 fetuss by their choice alone) lzozlzlz it takes a village–fund my village where we get to bang alphas and the betas pay for it whether we cuckold them in tehir homes or via the welfare state zlozlzozlzzlzl” and they bitch and complain and talk about handbags and butthex and twilight vampires and enocurage girls to long for and lust after undead bloodsucking vampire twilight monsters and butthexing douchebags and otehr things which make their bginas tingle repalced menz at univeristies menz who built invent iengineer buuikld invent reason truth write great books read great bookz think lzozlzl eb=engineer lzozlzlzozlzl replaced exaltation eand greatness with bdebt debuachery destitution lzozlz
short beta men rose fast in teh unievristy as they were handed fiat bernanke cash fronm helicopter ben and they used it to surrpound themselves with syocphantic harems of womenze as all teh betas love honor worship tucker max their ultimate master because he rhymes with goldman sax and also he butthexes girls and films it woithout teh girlths ocnthent and the weekly stanadrd neocns repeat his lies lzozlzlzlzzl that he is six foot tall zlozzlzllzlzlzlzl honoring their #1 butthexual hero lzozlzlzl
so anyeways teh fiat masters trianed owmen in the arts of divorce debuachery deseefxation destruction lozlzolzlzlz and abortion and debt creation, and as womenze rose to power on teh ffront lines of the epreemptive wars against teh unborn they murdered 50,000,000 since rose vs. wade they deconstructed and debuached tehc ulture on campuses as when yhou put womenze in charge it soons becomes all butthex all the time as priscilia paintion woemnze editor in chief of simon and schuster is publishing tucker max’s next book zlzolslssslslsoslsoslzozlzlzlzlz c hecks che-=checks it out peoples are saying and speaking out about the way womenze are debucahing defiling and butthexing the culture lozlzlzlzlzl:
http://community.feministing.com/2009/09/why-are-female-executives-publ.html
Why are Female Executives Publishing Tucker Max?
Saw this floating around. good question!
MCCOY MOUNTAIN
ART, FILM, & LITERATURE GUILD OF AMERICA
Ms. Priscilla Painton
Simon & Schuster Editor in Chief
RE: ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, Secretive Tapings of Anal Sex without The Girl’s Consent, Corporate Douchebaggery, and the Epic Failure of I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell
Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260
“Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php
Dear Ms. Painton,
I and my colleagues in the ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD have a couple questions regarding the direction you are taking Simon and Schuster in. Why are you guys/gals hating on art, literature, culture and America? It was recently brought to our attention that you are intent on publishing Tucker Max’s ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, and that your company actually gave him a $300,000 advance for his fart art. As the editor in chief of Simon and Schuster, owned the CBS corporation, do you truly believe Assholes Finish First? It is oft said that girls like “bad boys.” Does Tucker’s fart art douchebag wit titillate and excite you? Is that why you are publishing and profiting from it? Did you laugh during Tucker’s recent film flop when what’s-his-name stated that overweight women aren’t real people? Do you smile smugly when your billion-dollar corporation profits from douchebaggery?
http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system “The ads were poetic ditties of white text on a black background . Like: “Blind girls never see you coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding).””
“Over at the Washington, D.C., premiere, Max’s video minion ridicules both Vietnamese and African-American women, the former for being employed as a pedicurist, and the latter for having a name he finds funny.”
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/
Do you enjoy profiting from making fun of Asians and overweight women? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040
http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com
http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com
Does this make you laugh Ms. Painton? It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and CBS and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First . At most it will bring in a few pennies, which will lead everyone to conclude that you and CBS aren’t in it for the money, but just the debauchery and destruction of the culture. As Tucker Max pointed out, the feminist movement empowered women and gave them the right to choose the art they affiliated with and promote. So now, with all the power in your hands, what will you chose on behalf of women all over the world? Please do us proud and choose the right thing.
“The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).””
–http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html
Why is corporate America, under your direction Ms. Painton, forcing epic “Richard Kelly” fail fart art and film on the common public? Do you also find secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent to be entertaining and titillating art?
http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system
Let’s talk for a sec about something Tucker glamorizes and pretends is funny in his ‘book’: filming a naked women in his bedroom without her consent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that while he’s doing this he is coaxing the girl to have anal sex with him, an exploitative act that a guy like him probably especially enjoys.
–http://www.bitchmagazine.org/post/douchebag-decree-marketing-tucker-max
– http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/11/the-rapiest-quotes-from-i-hope-they-serve-beer-in-hell/
“OK, we can try anal sex , but I want it to be special and romantic. …. process: I was going to fuck her in the butt and film it without her consent ,” — http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/tucker_tries_buttsex_hilarity_does_not_ensue.phtml
Do you and the CBS Corporation find this entertaining? As you know, sodomy is a sin in the Old Testament as is sex out of wedlock and fornication. What is your motivation in working with those who promote and profit from secretive tapings of anal sex?
Do you find such “literature” and “art” to be representative of Simon and Schuster and CBS?
“In one of his most notorious pieces, he convinces a girl to have anal sex and tapes it without her consent.” — http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/08/tucker_max/
Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260
Ms. Painton–do you find that entertaining? Is it good literature? Do you consider demeaning stories about having sex with midgets good literature? Do you consider it good business to make fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities so as to bolster your bottom line?
What is driving you to publish Assholes Finish First ? What are your motivations? Money? America does not want Tucker Max, as demonstrated this past weekend at the boxoffice. Do you find these signs to be entertaining/a good CBS investment?
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/
Is Tucker Max’s fan base the group that Simon & Schuster is seeking to serve under your leadership?
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/14/tucker-max-too-sexist-for-ad-space/
It seems that America believes otherwise as Richard Kelly and Tucker Max’s I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell has proven to be a colossal artistic and financial failure.
“Not faring so well, however, was the Tucker Max adaptation I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which took in $369,000 from 120 theaters with a well-below-average $3,075 per-screen average.” — http://www.movieweb.com/news/NEdXykfeBDXwhe
So Priscilla, please tell us about your douchetastic love affair with Tucker Max and his fart art. Does it really titillate you as a woman and feminist? Say it isn’t so! Is this good Simon and Schuster/CBS branding? Why did your massive billion-dollar corporation reward Tucker with a $300,000 advance?
“Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php
Does CBS and Simon & Schuster approve of registering fake email accounts to promote stories regarding secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent?
” The lack of traditional plugs forced Max to promote his web site and book via the internet. He would create fake e-mail accounts and then bombard entertainment sites and news aggregators with links to his material.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/
For this, your billion-dollar corporation rewarded Tucker with a $300,000 advance.
“Max may have to concentrate on his agent style business moving forward because he’s running out of material. He’s received a $300,000 advance for a second version of his drunken, sexual exploits – a tome that will contain the stories not ripe enough for the first cut.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/
Are you proud of Simon & Schuster and your corporation? Funding and encouraging hype, failure, douchebaggery, debauchery, lies, secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent, and making fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities. Is that what attracts you to Tucker Max, or is it the epic artistic and financial failure of his film?
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_hope_they_serve_beer_in_hell/
“I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell fails in its attempts at raunchy humor, and Tucker Max comes across so unlikable and outrageous that the film’s inevitable story arc feels forced.”
It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First .
Best,
McCoy Mountain & The ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD
–http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040
Will Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster still Publish *beep* Finish First?
the title makes no sense. *beep* might finish first in some silly women’s eyes, but they epic fail in reality, as demonstrated by tucker’s epic fart art film fail, which priscilla painton is pretendning not to notice.
What’s up with women these days?
It seems the more they run things, the more they try to force douchebag fart art on everyone:
Former ‘Time’ Exec. Relieves Venerable Editor Mayhew At Simon & Schuster
http://gawker.com/5002333/former-time-exec-relieves-venerable-editor-mayhew-at-simon–schuster
Anywho, does Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster have a personal vendetta against asians, minorities, overweight women, and little people?
Does she think tucker’s ads are cute and humorous?
http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html
Does she get off on this?
“The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).”
Is that supposed to be funny?” –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/
Is this the new face and culture of simon and schuster?
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/
Does Priscilla Painton at Simon and Schuster giggle at secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent and also this:
http://www.penguinblogs.ca/davidson/archives/00000079.html
http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com/2008/08/sillylittlefreak.html
http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/the_absinthe_donuts_story.phtml
“11:17: The girl starts saying something about what a horrible person I am. I stare at her, but I am not listening. I am preparing myself. I am B-Rabbit. This is the final battle rap. I will win the hostile crowd:
[I interrupt the fat girl] “Ward, I think you’re being a little hard on the Beaver, [as I point to each in turn] so is Eddie Haskell, Wally, and Miss Cleaver.”
[To the fat guy with greasy hair in the camo vest] “Look out everyone! It’s the Pillsbury Commando! Hey Chunk, when was the last time you washed your hair? Does it give you more hit points to have that grease helmet? I hate to break the news, but +5 defense only counts in Dungeons and Dragons.”
[To the ugly Asian girl] “Why you no rike me? You want me frip over? You no piss me off! ME FIND YOU IN POCKING ROT!! YOU NO TAKE MING ARIVE!!”
[To the small frail dork–I notice he has a lazy eye] “Dude–Look at me when I’m talking to you–BOTH EYES AT ONCE. Are you really this ugly or are you just playing? EVERYONE, BE CAREFUL, THIS GUY LURKS UNDER THE STAIRS AND TRIES TO LICK YOUR SHOES WHEN YOU PASS BY!”
[To the original fatty, pause for effect] “Why do you do this to yourself? WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO YOURSELF? Look, I’m gonna give you some advice-leave the party, take the geek squad with you, go to Denny’s, order about 10 Grand Slam Breakfasts, and eat your pain away. Won’t be the first time will it?”
11:19: I am finished. The kitchen is quiet, except for Eddie and Rich laughing. The four freaks are completely speechless. Everyone is staring at me. I blurt out, “WHAT? I’m pretty sure it’s what Jesus would’ve done.” Eddie and Rich promptly remove me from the kitchen.”
Is Priscilla Painton publishing tucker’s next book for the love of literature, art, or money?
‘Cause it seems that those who work with tucker generally hate and lose literature, art, and money.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priscilla_Painton
http://www.theladyfinger.com/2009/09/tucker-max-brings-his-misogyny-to-big.html
“What ensues, according the film’s trailer, is alcohol-fueled misogynistic mayhem. Max has sex with several women, including, to his smug satisfaction, a dwarf.”
See? That is the clever banker ruse.
Have women such as Priscilla fund and promote it, while others protest it, enriching the bankers as marriage is destroyed and the state is grown.
http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/
“A Site about the Divorce Regime, Family Court Corruption,
and Government’s War on Fathers”
“The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. “The power of family court judges is almost unlimited,” according to Judge Robert Page of the New Jersey family court. “Social workers are perceived to have nearly unlimited power,” a San Diego Grand Jury concludes. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Total immunity [enjoyed by social workers] is absolute power.”
The divorce regime is responsible for much more than “ugly divorces,” “nasty custody battles,” and other clichés. It is the most serious perpetrator of human and constitutional rights violations in America today. Because it strikes the most basic institution of any civilization – the family – the divorce regime is a threat not only to social order but to civil freedom. It is also almost completely unopposed. No political party and no politicians question it. No journalists investigate it in any depth. A few attorneys have spoken out, but they are eventually suspended or disbarred. Some academics have written about it, but they soon stop. No human rights or civil liberties groups challenge it, and some positively support it. Very few “pro-family” lobbies question it. This is because the divorce regime operates through money, political power, and fear.” — http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/
–http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040
Have you seen/read END THE FED by Ron Paul? “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
–Vince Vaughn
When you think about it, Tucker Max was the Fed’s ultimate creation–a soulless, debased douchebag:
“My name is Tucker Max, and I am an *beep*
Think about it–Tucker’s motto @ http://tuckermax.com could be the Fed’s motto:
“I get excessively drunk via inflating the currency at inappropriate times, disregard social norms (funding feminism/debauchery & debasement of the family/currency/culture/tucker max(educated at the Fed’s University of Chicago’s School of Economics (school of freakanomics) and Duke scholarship)), indulge every whim/war, ignore the consequences of my actions/bubbles/bailouts, fund idiots and posers and tucker-max-like CEOs, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable/luring them with fiat currency & a fiat-funded bus, and just generally act like a raging darko/douchebag/dickhead.”
What do you think of Ron Paul’s new book–End the Fed?
End the Fed
Review for End The Fed
“Rarely has a single book not only challenged, but decisively changed my mind. “
–Arlo Guthrie
“Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
–Vince Vaughn
Vince Vaughn is a far, far better actor/director/writer than Tucker Max, so it makes sense that Tucker and his jealous friends at the Fed detest Arlo Guthrie and Vince Vaughan as well as art, film, and literature.
The book has much better reviews and is far-higher ranked than Tucker’s douchey books/film/trailer–Five solid stars!
Why do you donnie darko douchos/cbs haterz hate on art, the Constitution, morality, goodness, sound money, peace, prosperity, love, the family, kindness, and Ron Paul so much?
And like the Fed, tucker privatizes all the profits of his private jet while sharing all the risk with his volunteer employees, who work for free.
“Feminism which espoused “women’s rights” actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.” –http://www.savethemales.ca/
– http://www.amazon.com/Save-Males-Matter-Women-Should/dp/1400065798
LikeLike
Yeah, women line up for douchebags too lzlzlzlz azzclonz cockz-zuucker lolllzlzzl telz me sometin me donz knowd. Now tell me something elz doncha know lzlzlzlzlzlollmaolzlzlz
LikeLike
lozozlzoz you keeppe missisplein it! lzozozl pay attentions lzozlzozolzzozl !! lzozozz
LikeLike
tooker macks gottitit sux ofsheds be gbfm lzlzlzlzlz. so much fixation. lzlzlzlz mind fux lzlzlzlz. my mox u lololzlzlzlz!!!!
LikeLike
It’s not Tuck himself by the hypocritical faggot regime that expresses empty concern on the one hand and then pushes tranny buttsex on us. Fuck them
LikeLike
I agree. I also want to note that Tucker Max may have done it all by himself to get his fame and fortune, or he may have gotten some help from our ruling elite. I’m not God, and I don’t know how he got his money and fame, but I do know he got them. The burden of proof rests with those who say he got it from help from the ruling elite to prove it though. Tucker Max is a statistical improbability, but he is not a statistical impossibility even if he did it without the ruling elite’s help.
I always said to men do not make him your hero, but in a wierd way he should be your mentor. I do not consider him worthy to be praised with heroism. However, if you know how to read him correctly and read other things like this blog. you can learn from him. Even if you never become an Alpha of women even a 100th as much as him, you can learn about the nature of women. He is a self admitted asshole. Look at all the women who lined up to get fucked by him before he became famous, but at least they can try the excuse of they didn’t know any better. Look at how many more women lined up to get fucked by him after he became famous, and they knew what he was doing because of his 1st book and blog so they have not even fake excuses or better plausible excuses for their behavior. Any man who knows a woman fucked Tucker Max especially after he became famous should downgrade her to sport sex girl-toy as fast as he can; and, he should be extremely wary to regard her as serious girlfriend material if she fucked Tucker Max before he became famous to an extreme degree.
I’m 8 years older than Tucker Max, and women in my generation were fucking assholes when Tucker Max was in Elementary School. He also wrote about how many of his friends had a hard time with women and were screwed over by them, and his friend, Sling Blade, comes to mind. He shows you the hypergamy of women. Tucker Max even says in his books that women do this to themselves and have noone to blame but themselves for men like himself pumping and dumping them as well as treating them like shit. His books show the world what women really are, and for that he’s done a public service to men whether or not he knows or even likes the valuable lessons he has taught men who know how to learn from him,or he does not like what he has taught. MEN, it matters not what Tucker Max thinks, but learn from him—LEARN FROM HIM!!!
LikeLike
I’m half tempted to get some of my friends together to do this at a local mall. I have some big friends that could pose as body guards.
LikeLike
I’ve often thought of using my band (that went nowhere) as a pickup tool but I can’t lie. If I were in a band currently, I’d name drop all over. I probably know enough monster players that have had minor regional success to get some panties to drop without much effort.
LikeLike
When I read the goose stuff, I could only think about my facebook profile. I must fill my friends list with hotties anyway.
LikeLike
I want to thank The “Thomas Elliot Crew”
for YouTubing something
I knew since age 6
LikeLike
I hope he fucked her that night.
LikeLike
Maurice has it about right.
In the hunter and gatherer – or chimp, almost the same – society,
“wealth” has no meaning, there is minimal property. So how is
a girl to pick out winners. Well, besides good health and strength,
the biggest asset is his standing/status in the tribe. High standing
means he will be able to command resources, and in general
be the first to feed or whatever. So fame/status/standing/power
becomes the determining factor. Ask Dr. Kissinger, “power is the
ultimate aphrodisiac”.
Thor
LikeLike
The madness of crowds + Arrow’s Impossibility theorem = modern democracy.
A docu-film entitled “Starsuckers” carried out the exact same scenario featured in the clip except the “stars” were a pseudo celeb couple. Highly recommended viewing.
LikeLike
Women need context. Create some.
LikeLike
My friends and I experimented on Hot or Not in and out of our uniforms. Outside of our uniforms, women rated us as 5’s. In our dress blues, we were high 8’s. We didn’t have guns, but maybe the women assumed that if we had uniforms, the guns were very near.
LikeLike
Shootin’ at the walls of heartache, bang bang;
I am the warier…
LikeLike
I have to try this out at the bar. Could work really well.
What I could do is go with 5-6 friends and have them all talk me up, take autographs etc.
Me and my friends could rotate each time we go to a venue, and frequently change venues.
LikeLike
With a good team I could foresee this being very effective.
LikeLike
I’m thinking of becoming some kind of spiritual guru. Those guys get more sweaty head than a pitcher’s hat. There has to be a steam bath, psychedelics, and a tent involved.
LikeLike
Humor.
LikeLike
For your pullups brotha take some Taurine. I have pills never took the powda so don’t know about that. Also apple skin so apples and beta alanine.
LikeLike
Or, you could just imagine there’s a cupcake up there 🙂
(Five minutes of Academia beats five years of Benchpress)
LikeLike
Being famous is great!
But, being a bodybuilder who’s famous – even betta!
Just ask Arnold
he got to fuck the milf-maid
LikeLike
Dude Heartiste,
Natalia Vodianova cheated on her husband with a drunk, ugly, shriveled alpha male. She broke up her 10 year marriage, and the lives of her 3 or 4 children.
In fact, if you look at candid photos of her in the last year (since she left her Kind, Loving, Rich, Good-Looking husband) she has hit the wall big time.
And I’m a girl and I hate it when you say that about women…so if I’m saying Natalia has hit the wall. She’s…hit…the..wall…
I don’t understand why her personal life is so fucked up but in real life she says a ton of stuff I agree with.
It’s weird. Maybe her husband cheated on her, but that’s not what the tabloids said. They said she was the cheater?
LikeLike
she always was odd looking, with her asymmetric face. time does not improve such defects.
as for her behavior, a quote from the tweeted link says it all:
“I have to do what my heart tells me and not what my brain tells me”
yes, follow your heart. because it’s never led anyone to make mistakes.
LikeLike
Here is a depressing thought:
Those women have votes.
LikeLike
And the children don’t.
Biggest injustice of the 20th century.
LikeLike
http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/why-women-lose-the-dating-game-20120421-1xdn0.html
“From their whispered chat, she quickly realised they weren’t there to hear about politics and economics but to meet her eligible man. Naomi explains: ‘He’s 36 years old and is definitely someone who falls into the alpha-male category: excellent job in finance, PhD, high income, six feet two, sporty and very handsome. And he’s an utter sweetheart.'”
LOL. Item #1: money. Item #2: status. Item #3: money. Item #last: “sweetheart”. Hope you’re “alpha” enough to get a prenup, Mr. Sweetheart.
I was copy/pasting more of the article, but you should just go read the whole thing, it’s a fucking gold mine. It quotes Dalrock and it reads like Heartiste ghostwrote it. It even uses the words “cock carousel.”
LikeLike
“The 40-year-old single mother enlisted a team of advisers who helped her realise that while she was conducting her long search for the perfect man – Prince Charming or nobody – her market value had dropped through the floor.”
This part made me LOL
Funny how they need teams of advisers to tell them what was once common knowledge. This is why there was something called “Tradition”, so we don’t need to relearn things the hard way.
LikeLike
Yep. Hayek wrote a book (The Fatal Conceit) on the accumulated and often unarticulated knowledge that’s contained in tradition and is bulldozed without a thought when people decide they can re-engineer society more “rationally”.
LikeLike
“and often unarticulated”
That’s what made tradition such easy prey. Conservatives are almost as clueless as libs about the usefulness of the traditions they defend. And they defend traditions that have been made pointless by the disintegration of their counterpart traditions. For instance men ‘manning up’ is only fruitful when its counterpart (women manning down) is in play. Civic virtue is only fruitful when the society is worth upholding.
When tradition returns (which is inevitable) there should be a series of powerpoint presentation explaining exactly why each and every tradition is useful. Only in the rare cases that a tradition has outlived its usefulness should it be abandoned.
LikeLike
Thanks for that! Nothing more to add..
LikeLike
Great article. Thanks for posting. Sums up the current market to a T. For any delusional women you know in their 30’s point them to this.
LikeLike
That article was awesome. I love how that one dating website allowed men to refuse email from hags, err, I mean women their own age.
LikeLike
as always, the screeching from the comments section is good for epic lolz.
LikeLike
That article clearly struck a major nerve and it saddens me to see Aussie women have fallen prey to the madness as well.
One commenter shouts “Karma!” and the reply is: “Karma? For getting an education, having a well-paying job, having some drive, spirit and independence, living life as one sees fit? What a strange mentality to have towards other human beings.”
They just don’t get it.
Women have no idea of the bleak odds most men have been living with for years, or how disaffected it has made them. I’d guess the average beta, by the age of 30, has been rejected or flaked on at least one thousand times. What this teaches him is to keep a lot of irons in the fire and minimize his emotional investment in any of them.
He’s been brainwashed into thinking women are angelic and pure and like nice men, and admittedly that mindset is probably in his nature as well. Civilization, which we had up to a few decades ago, rewards this mindset. The jungle we live in now does not. The result is years of painful cognitive dissonance and, eventually, a pervasive cynicism born of the need for simple emotional self-preservation.
If he’s mature for his age, he probably even prefers the company of older (thirtysomething) women. They’re more mature than the ones his own age who are still partying and drinking and chasing bad boys, after all. But of course that’s a dead end too. The thirtysomething women are busy chasing fortysomething men with money, and when they want to dally with a younger man it’s hardly going to be a beta.
Our beta is in the 80% of men who spends his twenties watching 80% of the women go after the other 20% of the men. The kind of men he sees these women chase after, again and again, has been discussed at length here and hardly needs repeating. Needless to say, this adds greatly to his disillusionment.
He also knows about the 70%+ divorce rate and the fact that 70% of divorces are initiated by women, who need no cause for doing so, and he knows that the result is having half or more of his assets stripped. He may well have seen, at first hand, his father or another older man having his retirement cleaned out. No matter how “in love” you think you are, you’re a moron if you take on these odds. It’s like playing Russian roulette with five chambers loaded.
Someone once said a beta is like a baseball player who’s been kept on the bench for the entire game, until in the bottom of the 9th he’s suddenly called up and told to hit a sacrifice fly. Thing is, by then, he may well have dropped out.
He’s long since learned to treat sex as a bodily function, like eating or shitting, that he can accomplish with the help of some porn. He had to learn that during his decade and a half in the beta wasteland.
He’s learned to channel his passions into something else, like a hobby, or work, or volunteering. Indeed he can do whatever the hell he wants, outside of work, all day every day. Women, meanwhile, take it for granted that men are supposed to do things they don’t enjoy in exchange for the pleasure of female company. Thing is, why is the guy going to volunteer to be told what to do and how to spend his money? Women have treated him like shit for fifteen years while they chased the alpha male bad boy. Modern society has taught women to be entitled to the point of delusion, emotionally volatile and manipulative to the point of being bipolar, and above all to BLAME MEN. So why, after the experiences he’s had already, is he going to want to tune into this channel 24/7?
And the blaming continues when the beta mysteriously opts not to shove his head into the trap. The name-calling and the shaming and the cries to “man up” assail him from all sides. But what does he care? He tried doing just what women said they wanted for fifteen years and his reward was a bowl of piss with a brown submarine cruising in it. Scolding him is like putting out a fire with gasoline.
Sure, some betas learn game and find success with women. Most men seem to take a quantum leap in attractiveness to women just by crossing the age of thirty, having a few bucks, and not being omegas. The point is, the scales have long since fallen from their eyes. They’ve seen the beast and they cannot unsee it.
LikeLike
Fine post, Libertardian, all too heartrendingly accurate and also well written. There’s a rather successful writer, widely read in Europe anyway, called Michel Houllebecq, who’s generated some controversy by describing the fallout from the process you describe. His novels are inhabited by meek men who finally succumb meaninglessly to all the small wounds they suffer in the sexual free marketplace. To you and to Heartiste, I highly recommend Houellebecq.
[heartiste: i am familiar with his writings.]
LikeLike
Comment of the year. Well done.
LikeLike
Thank you LFP.
LikeLike
Most men seem to take a quantum leap in attractiveness to women just by crossing the age of thirty, having a few bucks, and not being omegas.
The thirties for men are like the 15-25 decade for women.
LikeLike
Having been the guy those women are looking for, the curious thing I would add is that when they do run into someone that meets at least some portion of their zillion-bullet-point-list, they behave like the girls in the video above. I’ve been stalked by surgeons, which is not something that should rationally occur.
It’s like shooting fish in a barrel.
LikeLike
Classic article. I just warms my heart to see these women get their just desserts after being on the receiving end of their hate/dismissal for so many years.
LikeLike
This is the first post I don’t completely agree on. For one, fame is not applicable to 99.9% of men, so it is a moot point trying to discuss it. Secondly, there are many famous people with ugly spouses (Lamar Odom with 5/10 Khloe Kardashian, many alternative rockstars with ugly girlfriends, the list can go on). In my own personal experience, I had a friend that was president of my college fraternity, went on to be the president of IFC (all the fraternities on campus) and has 1800 friends on Facebook. This guy had sex with 2 girls and had sex maybe 20 times in his life. On the other hand, the biggest players in the frat were the least involved dudes who actually weren’t big socialites.
Finally, the most successful I have ever been with picking up girls is when I am travelling or by myself in a new bar or city. Obviously, I would have zero social proof. I can’t really put a finger on why this happens, but a lot of my buddies share this experience.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, having fame doesn’t mean you have game. In fact, having fame often means you don’t develop game because you have girls approaching you so why would you NEED to develop game?
“Finally, the most successful I have ever been with picking up girls is when I am travelling or by myself in a new bar or city. Obviously, I would have zero social proof. I can’t really put a finger on why this happens, but a lot of my buddies share this experience.”
Main factors involved in this:
1) You give yourself permission to behave in a more outgoing, carefree, aggressive way because you’re in a different environment where you don’t have to worry about your social reputation. ie – you’re not in your regular bar where you subconsciously worry that your buddies or the staff or the regulars there who see you all the time will judge you for getting shot down or creeping girls out or being too grabby etc. So by default you’re behaving in a more attractive manner.
2) The girls know you’re not from around there, so you “don’t count” as a lay. You’re like the cabana boy they fuck when they go on vacation to Mexico. They know they’ll never see you again so they don’t have to worry about you coming back and fucking up their reputation, so they’re more inclined to let loose and fuck you with no LMR/ASD. This is why tourist-heavy cities like Vegas are overflowing with tourists fucking other tourists, whereas in a small remote town with just a couple pubs where everyone is a regular and people have to worry about their reputations and social judgement, the LMR/ASD is way higher.
3) You’re more excited to be there because you’re in a new environment. It’s not the same monotonous bar you’ve been going to for 5 years with the same people, the same staff, the same layout, the same music, the same crowd, etc. You’re in some new environment where everything is exciting and interesting to you and the women all seem better than the ones back home and you’ve been on an adventure travelling and making alpha decisions about where to go and what to do, etc. etc. and that vibe comes off you and the girls pick up on it. Think of the energy you have on your first day at a new job in a new office VS on a random Tuesday morning at a boring cubicle job you’ve been doing for 10 years.
4) The girls are excited to meet “new guys”. They’re bored with the guys they’ve been around, whether they’re tourists or locals, you’re new fresh meat and a change from the guys they’re used to.
There’s more, but those are the main ones. It’s not an unexplainable phenomenon. 🙂
LikeLike
Emotional programming. Applies to all aspects of the sheeple.
And it can always be beaten. Here, the recent experience with a girl from Burma (and her cock blocking friend): http://two.cedonulli.com/2012/04/4471/
LikeLike
Yeah, all you need to know about fame is two words:
Kato Kaelin.
Two more:
Scott Baio.
In any event, I learned this lesson firsthand way back in 9th grade. I did a school play where I added a few funny actions to my character, and I could see a few girls in the front row staring at me hardcore, despite the fact that I wasn’t even the lead or the center of attention at any time. That night, I made out with one of them (principal’s daughter!) and got a couple of numbers. And these girls walked past me every day before that, with neither a second glance or a nervous tittering giggle.
Fame works, boys.
Or, as the guys from the band Poison put it so well, “Anyone who gets into rock music and tells you it isn’t to get laid is lying.”
LikeLike
Speaking of freshman year, back in ninth grade I was the lead in a dopey little one-performance play-skit. Damn did the junior-high groupies giggle and swarm.
Fame isn’t just tingle-inducing for teenagers, it starts in infancy and is highly relative. Watch a kid go apeshit for some minimum-wage laborer in a fluffy costume they saw on TV. Barney gets ass. That dude from Blue’s Clues? Forget about it. Moms would pay for the honor of their kids’ getting molested by Steve.
The practical application is to adopt the aloofness of the famous, with an assist from third parties’ attention (wingman, social proof, entourage, peacocking, familiarity by the regulars [“Norm!”]) whenever possible. To actually be famous, though? Why bother? The desired reaction is visceral and easy to inspire through deliberate, fraudulent means.
The king always enters last, after his procession. Like a bishop in his cathedral, the captain of a ship, the main event on a fight card, the keynote speaker, or the honored guest: LILO.
Matt
LikeLike
“The practical application is to adopt the aloofness of the famous, with an assist from third parties’ attention (wingman, social proof, entourage, peacocking, familiarity by the regulars [“Norm!”]) whenever possible.”
This was Mystery’s approach to game in a nutshell. Mystery Method is still the best/most efficient way to work together as a group. This is why a lot of his tactics involved introducing girls to your wings, telling DHV stories about your buddy, etc. Unfortunately, it requires a group of like-minded guys who are all into studying pickup and on the same page to pull this off…most dudes aren’t living in Project Hollywood and going out with top PUAs every night. Most of us are stuck either solo or with a few buddies who have no game or are naturals and think game is over-thinking.
So other PUA schools went down different paths, with a lot of them focusing on going out solo (bars, daygame, etc.) and either working around not having social proof, entourage, familiarity, etc. or working on generating those things (or at least the ILLUSION of having those things) on the fly from scratch.
I actually purposely liked the challenge of going to bars as an unknown and generating it all on the fly.
Also, if you’re older (like you’re a 40yo+ macking on 18yos), but still want to run nightclub/bar game, the entourage type game is a lot better. Then you’re not the creepy old dude in the club popping out from the shadows, you’re the “Most Interesting Man In The World” guy who seems to be a big deal because everyone knows him.
LikeLike
What, in your estimation, is the best/most efficient way to work solo. Or, rather, who authored the approach on the best way to work solo? I’m interested because I find myself more and more rolling solo. All my friends are knocking up their wives.
LikeLike
Heartiste and Dalrock are both walking talking human books of insight and snappy phrases….they should just each have their own columns syndicated globally 🙂
Anyway, women *want* the illusion, when it comes along of course they’re going to dive right in with all the critical faculty of a stockholm syndrome kidnapped childrapée lol
If women act/think like chimps, lie to em, use/abuse them, pump em, dump em, treat them like fuck meat. It’s all a race to the bottom gents, might as well take the scenic route in a hail of cum droplets and crocodile-secretly-turned-on bitchtears.
LikeLike
Why are you so mean?
You must have a small penis and can’t handle a strong empowered woman.
/sarcasm off
LikeLike
Interesting the difference between a T-shirt and a good suit, and the effect on women. I recently wore my work clothes to a heated town council meeting in the bedroom community where I live. I’m on the council but they had only ever seen me in T-shirts or golf shirts; I keep my professional life as an upper tier attorney segregated from my home life. So we had this heated debate with angry citizens venting, and instead of being the conciliatory guy like usual, I was the authoritative, firm, guy. Instead of a T-shirt I had on a bespoke suit & shirt, cuffs, Rolex, and some high end wing tips, dressed as I would at work for a significant meeting or court appearance. I eventually swayed the rest of the council and most of the town folk to the wisdom of my position, we voted, I won.
The side effect was that I got a lot of female attention after the vote from surprisingly hot housewives whom I’d seen around at Scouts or community sports, wanting to talk about frankly irrelevant local political issues. Were they Tingly? Maybe. I certainly wouldn’t bother somebody to talk about whether we’re stocking the fish pond this year… You think there’s a lot of hot blonde thirty something housewives who fish? This episode put me on the social radar of a lot of these women, who now make it a point to say hello at the supermarket or at our kids’ soccer or lax games, even when I’m in Tevas & T-shirt. I’m not trying to fool around on my wife, but if I was, there’d be some opportunities now.
Dressing well and wearing it properly – not sporting a faggy effete metrosexual designer clothes fetish but getting at home and comfortable in a nice suit and acting like a grownup – rings their bell.
LikeLike
“instead of being the conciliatory guy like usual, I was the authoritative, firm, guy”
This is what made the difference, not your suit.
This is why famous people don’t have to all wear bespoke suits to be famous.
Also (big concept coming up): there’s a good chance that you’ve created different identities with regards to wearing your suit VS wearing your casual clothes. ie – in your suit you give yourself permission to be authoritative and dominant, because you have plenty of reference experiences from your career of being that while wearing your suit so your brain says “oh, my suit is on? Okay, this is how we behave then.” and you have the reverse for your casual clothes (“chill bro, we’re not at work here, let’s just make everyone happy and not stir the pot, k?”).
This is similar to situational confidence where a person is loud and outgoing around their friends in an environment they feel comfortable in, but are quiet and reserved around strangers in an environment they aren’t comfortable in…except this involves clothing instead of people or an environment.
This is very subtle stuff that you probably wouldn’t actually notice in yourself unless you paid really close attention to it and made it a habit of being overly self-aware. “Identity” is a very deep concept that actually spiderwebs out into a ton of other concepts of pickup, alpha behavior, entitlement, and attraction.
LikeLike
Unfortunately, I look like kevin james on a slim fast diet. The only women I could attrac t is leah remini.
LikeLike
I have a shaved head and a thick goatee, and people always tell me I look just like Kevin Youkilis from the Boston Red Sox.
I was in Boston recently, and the IOI’s I got from the girls in the clubs was ridiculous. I guess just looking like someone who’s famous is enough.
LikeLike
– I’m Lemmy Kilmister from Motorhead, and I approve this message.
LikeLike
It is so easy to picture those pockmarked, skinny little shits carrying knives.
LikeLike
Regarding the second study, I brought a new watch.Its something my peer group would find above class.And I have had women(peers at work) staring at it.If a gun predicts “dominance” what would a classy watch predict?
LikeLike
It can’t predict anything. It can only tell something…time. If you set it 5 minutes ahead, it can anticipate something. Of course, it would seem like a prediction until the first time it is wrong in anticipation. Then, it would not matter.
LikeLike
Thankyou Smartass …Now, what would HAVING a classy watch predict?
LikeLike
unrelated but are sexbots just around the corner?
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2011/12/clothing-giant-hm-defends-use-of-virtual-models/
LikeLike
“Fame” (a loose term) even on a local basis gets one laid quite often. As an ex-guitar player in local bands with moderate regional success for years in younger days, every night was eenee meenie miney mo. Men are hollow?
LikeLike
Ah yes, the sisterhood:
http://abcnews.go.com/News/york-mom-fired-donating-kidney-boss/story?id=16195691#.T5bZn2FXDIh
To think, if only women ran the world, there would be no double crossing.
LikeLike
Jack Baruth writes about cars the way that Heartiste writes about the Charismatic arts. There’s a whole bunch of red pill in this one:
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2012/04/hype-and-hypertrophy-how-lamborghini-lost-its-man-card/
LikeLike
Professional shooting instructors have known this for a while. I have heard it referred to as “The Henry Bowman Effect”. Nearly every woman I teach to shoot gets gina tingles so blatant that you can practically see the snail trail when I send them downrange to paste their targets. Now, it doesn’t work so well if you’re a neckbearded fatty, but let me give you a sample of an email I got from a 24-year-old nurse I taught some defensive shooting to last summer:
“Now that I’ve gotten my upper torso out of the gigantic pile of bricks that took me out about 1/2 way through the day today, I’m trying to shake the brick dust out of my ears and get a clean thought process going…. aided by some Ambien so excuse me if spelling and grammar doesn’t match my level of intelligence. Maybe and I had too much time up in the truck talking, or I had time to myself to think about things, or I saw you with – but something has absolutely snapped in my brain- and I am in LOVE with you. I don’t get it. You’re not mine. You will never be, and have never been. I can’t help the way I feel. It’s almost like when I was watching you teach today, my brain was saying “he’d make a great father”, and when you were shooting, the brain was saying “He can protect you” and talking about your job stuff lately says “he’s a provider”… and not to mention I think your calves are sexy—– I think my ovaries and screaming at me to reproduce and I think they chose you. I don’t actually WANT children, but you get it. That’s where I’m at. I love you for who you are, and how you’re a friend to me, but then my body wants to jump in and decide that you’d be the perfect sperm for me? It’s a little fucked up but I’m becoming more aware of these weird biohealth things going on with my hormonal 24 year old body. I’m hornier than ever, I cry at Gerber baby commercials, and watching my sister breastfeed makes MY boobs sore. How is this fair?!?!? This is wrong on so many levels. You are happily married. I WANT to be happily married to . I eventually wouldn’t mind children (distant future), but I can’t figure out why today I had to come to terms with the reality that I LOVE you but nothing will ever change (as It should NOT). That kiss was phenomenal, but far too short. All that really did was jab a knife into my already aching heart that I can’t kiss you every time I leave, or when I say hello, or good morning. It makes me sad I’m actually crying right now and this is fucked up..
Even more so, I will get married in the future and unless he’s a complete douche, you guys will be invited to the wedding. I’ll be in my poofy dress and you in a suit and you’ll come up for a dance and we’ll just look at eachother and *sigh* because I’ll be secretly wishing it was you. Do you know how FUCKED UP THAT IS??? I will love my husband, and he will be great- but there is already a man out there that I think would make a good partner for me. That’s not supposed the way it’s supposed to work. I have more thoughts but I cant even type sentences anymore. I’m sorry.
Peace out.
”
I saved that email just because it was such a classic example of HBS.
Anyway – the other chick was practically humping my leg too. It’s a hazard that has served me well.
The Raven
LikeLike
Outstanding story. I know a firearms instructor, former SWAT guy who now trains civilians and LE, who is also jacked, who drowns in pussy being thrown his way. It’s a little ridiculous to watch.
LikeLike
Jesus.
LikeLike
Jesus, what?
There is more than one way to skin this particular kitty – the metrosexual bar scene seems to be where most of the PUA community does its work, and that’s not my hunting ground. I go out enough to keep my skills sharp, but there is enough action at work and the training classes I teach that it usually isn’t worth my time to mess with some drunk-ass Alpha Chi in a bar.
About me, for context: I’ve been poking around this site for six months or so, and according to CH I’m somewhere toward the high end of the Lesser Alpha zone.
LikeLike
but let me give you a sample of an email I got from a 24-year-old nurse I taught some defensive shooting to last summer:
There’s that word “nurse” again…
LikeLike
“Nurse”…. should be code for “I fuck on the first date”.
LikeLike
Wow. Assuming the note is legit, that is one of the most straightforward accounts of a hamster’s soliloquy I have ever seen. I’m skeptical about its legitimacy only because of its rarity, like a Willie Mays rookie card. Of the exceedingly few women aware of what makes them tick, still fewer are the ones who can articulate it. For the record, I do think it’s real, but you never know.
Quoth the The Raven: “I think my ovaries and screaming at me to reproduce …you’d be the perfect sperm … watching my sister breastfeed makes MY boobs sore …”
What a gem. This blurb should go into an encyclopedia.
“Do you know how FUCKED UP THAT IS???” Oh yes, baby doll. Yes we do. The Raven should proceed with the advanced lesson in intersexual dynamics, as the student is clearly ready and eager. So many hopelessly lost married women, so little time for all the sororal correction. He can nip this one in the bud.
Matt
LikeLike
I swear upon anything I hold sacred that that email is 100% true and unredacted except for the names that I snipped out.
LikeLike
And FTR, I did nail it (well,I might add). After she spent all morning hanging out with her friend and my wife at the range. No one’s the wiser.
I’m 40 and appear to score as a Lesser Alpha, if that’s of any interest.
And what man could fabricate a fuckin’ email like that?/
LikeLike
Was she as annoying as the email?
LikeLike
Being famous is a pain in the ass. I don’t really understand why so many folks are obsessed with it. But maybe it’s just because I’m an introvert outlier.
There is a difference between celebrities and legends. Celebrities talk and talk and talk about whatever achievement or under-achievement they had. Legends let their actions speak for them.
The founder of CH is a legend. And I want to be a legend too. I’m just as selfish and egomaniac as any jersey shore monkey, but I consider the spotlight a high price for pussy access. I prefer my name to be whispered with respect by a thousand mesmerized generations, but I will rely on my game to get pussy during my lifetime.
BTW, CH, congratulations cause you’re a fucking legend. Let the monkey celebrities keep dancing.
LikeLike
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/06/21/theater/the-life-of-fakery-and-delusion-in-john-guare-s-six-degrees.html
LikeLike
The dude who’s (in)famous for the Sham-Wow informercial got busted for punching a hooker in the face.
Wrong kind of fame is a losing game
LikeLike
Here’s a similar, but much more elaborate prank executed on/in the most exclusive nightclubs in Moscow (and probably the world). Long but worth it. I give you… the Buns McGillicuddy incident: http://exile.ru/articles/detail.php?ARTICLE_ID=7000
LikeLike
It is dubious for a man to desire fame, as it confesses his lack of value to cause it.
[heartiste: women don’t seem to notice the difference; or, really, to care. fame is its own reward.]
LikeLike
“The concept of perception fluidity is crucial to game theory, for much of seduction is the psychology of massaging women’s perceptions via manipulation of your identity, behavior and image to project the aura of alpha maleness which is so alluring to the warier sex.”
I’d replace [manipulation] with [calculated display].
Manipulation suggests that one is forcing what could be a falsehood of your identity for an intended result. This could be true for a younger student. However as one advances in the refinement of game’s application it isn’t a manipulation of your identity per se, but more of a decission process on what elements of your identity to strengthen or soften the display of; based on the situation.
Regardless, “perception management” often used in the sales profession is the same concept as “perception fluidity”. It’s being aware of your presentation and calibrating any resources under your control to best influence a desired outcome.
A practical example is when I go out to younger (21 to 25ish) higher-energy venues vs. older (25 to 30ish) type lounge venues. I may dress more edgy, accessorize and be more assholeish and aggressive with the younger women. Whereas with the older group I may dress more sharp, less edgy and be more quick-witted and smooth. However my core identity is the same; just calibrated to the perception I want manage.
Another point I’d mention is why a good artist can go out alone. You can build social validation and pre-selection literally on-demand and manage your obstacles better. I coach some students to stop hanging out with big groups of their beta friends…and perception is exactly why. Your value drops when you have a bunch of beta-tard dudes hovering, pecking, groveling, shit-smiling, DQing, and annoying targets that you try and open etc. Your perception is that you’re just another AFC/beta. And if your friends don’t know game then they are just more hoops of fire to jump through in your process.
At least get one of them to film you or somethin… 😉
LikeLike
Apologies for a double post in there somewhere…
LikeLike
Do any of you people ever read the Bible? David was being sung about by girls because he had killed ten thousand people. King Saul was jealous about that. David became king and had numerous wives and concubines. There is nothing new under the sun. He probably didn’t look any better than other Jews at the time.
LikeLike
I thought that mall entrance looked familiar when they were driving off. I live less than a mile from where these geniuses pulled that off.
LikeLike
Fame = social proof w/ strangers.
LikeLike
Has the sexual revolution killed off technological progress?
The latest trend in economic thought is a complete re-appraisal of technology-driven productivity growth over the last few decades. According to Peter Thiel, Tyler Cowen, Garry Kasparov and a host of others, technological progress (and hence, society-wide improvements in utility) has been disappointingly slow since the 1970s relative to the decades prior to the 1970s. Sure, we have iPhones, faster computers, the internet, etc, but these are all mere improvements in technology which existed around that time. The number of truly REVOLUTIONARY technological creations since the 1970s has been virtually nil. I’m talking about groundbreaking inventions like Penicillin, the airplane, television, etc.
Perhaps pre sex revolution men sacrificed thousands of hours of their youth innovating, working and creating wealth in order to raise their social status and land an attractive bride. Post-revolution, however, this formula broke down and the allure to women of a wealthy businessmen with no game diminished when they could have consequence-free sex and support themselves economically, often with the assistance of the state. In the absence of economic pressures, the female sex drive has reverted to its prehistoric roots, where a narcissistic yet charismatic ‘hunter-gatherer’ male who lives on subsistence wages is far more attractive to the female id than an uncharismatic yet affluent nerd.
LikeLike
I think Mindfuck overstates the case.
1) Development changes arena. 1900-1950 we build planes, trains
and automobiles. (Think Times Square 1900 and 1950)
1950-2000 created electronics and computers. Times Square changed
only marginally but offices were revolotionized. 2000-2050 – way to early to tell but my guess is bio- and nano-technology.
2) Female hypergamy has had opportunity to go WAY beyond historic
or even hunter/gatherer roots,. Prehistoric woman had to play it carefullly,
she could NOT make it alone and she had no access to welfare, so the
sex game was VERY serious, a matter of survival.
Thor
LikeLike
[…] violence circuit: A heartiste reader commented recently about how when he brings women to the gun firing range, they inevitably get hot for him, and […]
LikeLike
[…] [Another Experimentally Confirmed Game Concept: Influencing Perception] […]
LikeLike
[…] [Another Experimentally Confirmed Game Concept: Influencing Perception] […]
LikeLike
[…] Another Experimentally Confirmed Game Concept: Influencing Perception (heartiste.wordpress.com) […]
LikeLike
[…] Another Experimentally Confirmed Game Concept: Influencing Perception (heartiste.wordpress.com) […]
LikeLike