• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Interview With Daygamer Nick Krauser
The Most Flattering Words You Can Hear From A Woman »

Fast-Tracking Familiarity

May 21, 2012 by CH

Something that gets lost in discussions about seducing women is the speed aspect of the endeavor. Pickup used to be called speed seduction for a reason: it was a human social technology specifically designed to maximize the arousal of women and minimize the time and resource investment needed to bed them.

(For those smart alecks who say “Just be Brad Pitt and you won’t have to do anything to pick up women!”, kindly remind yourselves that famous men usually had to spend many years devoted to their craft before they hit the fame jackpot.)

I knew a guy who was a natural with women — i.e., he had imbued game concepts from an early enough age that the alpha way to act around women came second-nature to him, and his interactions glimmered with unrehearsed élan. Anyhow, something I noticed he often did with women was playfully fuck around with their names. (He never offered his name until he first learned a girl’s name.)

For example, if the girl told him her name was Ann, he would riff a stream of dorky permutations on her name in a deadpan manner.

“annster” “wham bam thank you ann” “ANNdle with care” “this ann is your ann, this ann is my ann”

You need a minimal degree of creativity to pull this off, but the result usually gets the girl smiling. More importantly, it signaled to girls that 1. he didn’t give a shit what they thought about his humor and 2. he was the sort of guy a girl could be instantly friendly toward without feeling awkward.

And really, a big component of successful seductions is the ability to quickly make a girl feel comfortable in your presence — to fast-track familiarity. And the way to do this is to put a girl at ease that you won’t make the mistake of deep-sixing a conversation with social clumsiness borne of low confidence and inexperience spending time with women.

Other FTF tactics he would use included the “Marry, Fuck, Kill” and “If you had to choose…” games, which he would launch into without any proper segue at all.

(“If you had to choose…” is my favorite because it’s awesome at getting girls to reveal their values. “If you had to choose between waking up next to Jonah Hill or waking up next to Charlize Theron, which would you choose?”)

I once asked him half-seriously his secret to picking up women. He said, “I cut them off.” By that, he meant he would cut off their conversation to inject whatever stupid shit happened to pop into his head (and which, coincidentally, would move the discussion in a more fruitful sexual direction). “But isn’t that rude?” “Nah, not to girls. Guys would think it was rude, but guys aren’t girls.”

Words to live by.

Seduction is the art and science (the artence) of shifting a girl’s perception of you from faceless beta null entity to damn-this-dark-triad-jerk-would-fit-nicely-between-my-legs. The words you choose and the demeanor you adopt go a long way to helping, or hindering, your pickup efficiency.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Game | 180 Comments

180 Responses

  1. on May 21, 2012 at 4:53 pm maurice

    Groan. The name thing reminds me of Rob Schneider’s dorky Xerox-room guy from SNL back in the day. I suppose it’s posssible to do that in a cooler way, but still.

    M/F/K, in addition to being an effective convo/pickup routine, is also a way to glean a woman’s taste in men, at least those around that bnar and in her current frame of mind: M/F/K = beta/alpha/omega.

    The interrupting and conversation-redirecting show dominance and aloofness, but also can be rude- the key (as noted) is to do it in a funny way but also a way that reads/is sensitive to her mood and personality.

    LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 7:01 pm Firepower

      haurice said

      For those smart alecks who say “Just be Brad Pitt and you won’t have to do anything to pick up women!”

      More Ice, you beat me to it. Does it matter I was plannin’ on using Jonny Depp this time?

      LikeLike


  2. on May 21, 2012 at 4:56 pm M

    its offtopic havnt read the post yet but: does anybody know of happy (for reals) familys, real love around ya. real love aka good parenting and love for childrens. it kinda bothers me that game has nothing to do with it. and therefore the world we live in is a dysytopia dysgenia dys and that. the way i see it heartiste gonna spend the ww3 end of the world as we know it in some bunker. hmm mb gbfm will post and say what to do not doomsay. leaderships, not arcs l0l.

    LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 6:22 pm King A (Matthew King)

      You hit on an underappreciated aspect of the kind of fellows who gravitate toward PUA conversation. I’d be willing to bet a large part of their “dark” cynicism derives from growing up in the divorce culture. Seeing their beta dad fucked over by an alpha cad makes a deep impression about the possibilities and limits of human nature. Likewise, seeing their slutmom fuck up her life with hypergamy leaves a similar mark.

      But I’m not much on psychoanalysis, so take it fwiw. Suffice it to say, I’m not as sour about the future because my rock-solid, kick-ass family — from grandparents to uncles to siblings and now post-millennial children, all anchored by my parents at the heart of it — was absolutely indispensable to making me the well-adjusted and successful man I am today. So indispensable that I have grave doubts any child can ever fully overcome divorce, much less all the baggage that attends it (cheating, fighting, prepubescent rupture prior to the capacity to fathom it, affection turned into manipulation, becoming a pawn between parents, etc.). Maybe I’m mistaken. Call it a prejudice against the psychologically damaged spawn of broken homes.

      “Does anybody know of happy (for reals) families?” That seems like a bizarre question to me. Of course we do. We grew up in one. We few, I suppose, we happy few.

      Matt

      LikeLike


      • on May 25, 2012 at 5:01 pm benjack

        Judith Rich Harris (google it.) says you’re wrong.

        LikeLike


      • on May 25, 2012 at 6:08 pm King A (Matthew King)

        If Aunt Judy said it, who am I to contradict her?

        Well there’s the global dysfunction of broken-home latch key kids, but who am I going to believe, Grandma Harris or my lying eyes?

        LikeLike


  3. on May 21, 2012 at 5:10 pm Senior Beta

    “Guys aren’t girls.” The one thing, above all, you teach. In the immortal words of Karl Marlantes (The Matterhorn): There it is.

    LikeLike


  4. on May 21, 2012 at 5:15 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    hey hey heartistststessss!!! i have been working on my lanaguagagessz and have been postssing more ocoehernetly!!!!

    da spearhead mighty speareheead publsiehed some of my commentztztz lzozozozo:

    http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/05/21/john-scalzi-offers-creative-interpretation-of-white-male-privilege/#comment-150580

    Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM) May 21, 2012 at 14:02

    John Scalzi is part of the Feminist-Fanboy-Fiatocracy. A supposed “writer,” never does he quote nor reference a Great Book nor Classic, as he is not Mn enough to read the Greats. Everything the useful idiot says or does is designed to further the decline of the West in service of the Fiatocracy, while the few, at the top, profit immensely in the massive transfer and destruction of wealth brought about by the Fiatocray’s Industrial-Entitlement Complex.

    Imagine a videogame which let one save the girl just as Tucker Max was about to butthext her and tape it secretly. Never would Scalzi/Kokatu approve of such a game, as the fiatocracy’s lifeblood is the desouling of women and future “wives” (vehicles of wealth transfer).

    But someday we will realize the videogames which allow one to Man Up and fight for the US Constitution, which the Fiatocracy slams through Kokatu:

    http://kotaku.com/5896004/player-encounters-hooker-this-might-be-the-most-epic-video-game-patent-application-ever/gallery/1

    Here’s a description of the Noble Game which Kokatu slams as the Fiatocracy must dumb down and debauch all of entirety as it debauches the currency, denying us the Exalted Homeric Culture of Our Fathers:

    System and method for creating exalted video games and virtual realities wherein ideas have consequences:

    “A video game method and system for creating games where ideas have consequences, incorporating branching paths that correspond to a player’s choices, wherein paths correspond to decisions founded upon ideals, resulting in exalted games with deeper soul and story, enhanced characters and meanings, and exalted gameplay. The classical hero’s journey may be rendered, as the journey hinges on choices pivoting on classical ideals. Ideas that are rendered in word and deed will have consequences in the gameworld. Historical events such as The American Revolution may be brought to life, as players listen to famous speeches and choose sides. As great works of literature and dramatic art center around characters rendering ideals real, both internally and externally, in word and deed, in love and war, the present invention will afford video games that exalt the classical soul, as well as the great books, classics, and epic films—past, present, and future.”

    1. A method for creating video games and virtual realities wherein ideas have consequences.

    2. The method in claim 1 where said ideas are rooted in classical, epic precepts such as those found in the Great Books and Classics, and exalted at the pinnacles of Western culture and history.

    3. The method in claim 1 where said ideas are manifested in the words the player or non-player characters, write, speak, read, disseminate, congregate about, fight for, and/or associate with.

    4. The method in claim 1 where said ideas are manifested in the actions the player, non-player characters, and/or monsters act out.

    5. The method in claim 1 where said ideas spread like viruses, by being spoken, written, or disseminated in some other manner, transforming characters who come in contact with said ideas into vampires, zombies, or other forms of monsters.

    6. The method in claim 1 where said ideas spread like viruses, by being spoken, written, or disseminated in some other manner, transforming characters who come in contact with said ideas into vampires, zombies, or other forms of monsters, and where said vampires, zombies, and monsters may be saved or converted back to normal by coming in contact with ideas that oppose the ideas that made them vampires, zombies, and other forms of monsters.

    7. The method in claim 1 where said ideas must be fought for via words and dialogue, before they have exalted consequences.

    8. The method in claim 1 where said ideas must be fought for via deeds and actions, before they have exalted consequences.

    9. The method in claim 1 where the player can fight for said ideas in word and deed, and witness the exalted consequences of those ideals, including liberty, freedom, and justice, when they succeed, and the dire consequences of tyranny, domination, and intimidation, when they fail to render exalted ideas, as ideas have consequences.

    10. The method in claim 1 where the character can fight for said ideas such as marriage, the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and right to life in word and deed, and witness the exalted consequences of those ideals, including a stable and enduring society should they succeed, and a declining, bankrupt civilization, should they fail.

    11. The method in claim 1 where the character can battle for said ideas that are based upon classical moral and economic principles of famous philosophers, prophets, poets, statesmen, and economists including Plato, Moses, Jesus, Gandhi Sun Tzu, Buda, Jefferson, Aristotle, F. A. Hayek, Martin Luther King Jr., Homer, Ludwig Von Mises, Adam Smith, and others, and witness the consequences of both their success and failure of their battle, as the consequences are rendered in the game’s physical world.

    12. The method in claim 1 where the character can battle for said ideas via both word and deed, using a combination of words and action, witnessing the consequences of their balance between word and deed, between reasoning and partaking in violence, thusly bringing to life epic classical works of film and literature wherein the hero must balance word and deed.

    13. The method in claim 1 where fighting for said ideas in word and/or deed will have consequences regarding the operation of a weapon, which will operate at its full potential for the players and characters who are the most successful in serving ideals and ideas, and rendering them in word and deed.

    14. The method in claim 1 wherein said ideas may be based upon Constitutional ideals and ideas underlying the American Founding, including the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, sound currency, the right to bear arms, the freedom of speech, the right of the artist, author, and inventor to own their creations and inventions; and wherein the player could fight for sound money in word and deed and witness the consequences of their successes and failures, including liberty, wealth creation, capitalism, freedom, private property, peace, and prosperity or rapid inflation, deflation, theft via the inflation tax, massive debt, empire, long lines, wealth transfer to the rich, depressions, corruption, and war.

    15. The method in claim 1 where the said ideas will be supported or opposed by in-game characters, and the player will have to choose how to interact with the said in-game characters, based on their ideas, including but not limited to whether or not to befriend them, agree with them, disagree with them, ignore them, recruit them, shoot them, save them, judge them, or forgive them.

    16. The method in claim 1 where the said ideas are based upon the pivotal plot points of the great books and classics.

    17. The method in claim 1 where said ideas spread like viruses, by being spoken, written, or disseminated in some other manner, transforming characters who come in contact with said ideas into vampires, zombies, or other forms of monsters; and when bad ideas have infected too many in-game characters, the consequences are dire, including the loss of life, liberty, happiness, freedom, and security.

    18. The method in claim 1 wherein said ideas may be related to economics and monetary policy, and wherein the player could fight for sound money in words echoing the classical economists and deed and witness the consequences of their successes and failures, including liberty, freedom, peace and prosperity or rapid inflation, deflation, theft via the inflation tax, massive debt, empire, long lines, depressions, corruption, and war.

    19. The method in claim 1 wherein moral ideas have moral consequences in the evolution of the gameworld.

    20. The method in claim 1 where said ideas in the video game world are founded upon the natural ideas and ideals occurring at the plot points in great works of literature and film where a character must choose whether to serve an ideal or not serve an ideal, thusly rendering or not rendering ideals real by their actions, and influencing the greater outcome and state of the game world, as ideas have consequences.

    21. The method in claim 1 where said ideas in the video game world are used to exalt the classic hero’s journey, and where a player’s success and progress at every stage or step or plot point of said hero’s journey is defined by said player’s service or disservice to said ideas and ideals, and where by said player’s serving said ideas and classical ideals, said hero’s journey advances towards ultimate victory and triumph, while by said character’s failing to serve said ideas and classical ideals, progress in said hero’s journey is retarded or reversed.

    zlzoozzlz now dat would be a videogegamez!!! i woul dplay on xbox live with kay hymowitz tits and bill beenneete!!! we could all man up and figt for da us cocns cocntshistutssutionz!!!!

    and save owmenz from getting butethed buttehxed by da fiatocc9cy;s buttehextters! lzozozlzo

    LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 6:47 pm King A (Matthew King)

      Are you feeling okay? That was readable.

      Or are you just lulling (llzlolling) them to sleep before you pounce with your full-blown, backspace-allergic llzollapalooza?

      LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 6:53 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Dear King A,

        I would like to let everyone know that I recently lost the Aderoll/Ritalin prescription the School Nurse prescribed be back in fourth grade when I asked, “Is it moral for the Federal Reserve banking cartel to print money and place the world in debt while the rest of us is supposed to work for for that money and pay taxes on it?”

        I got sent to the office and drugged up.

        But for the past few days I have been off my prescription, so da lzozozozzlzllzozllzozlosszlzozo and tremors have not been afflicting me quite as much lzozozzoz.

        I have been waiting for The Spearhead to start pursuing exalted cultural issues that are dear to the heart of GBFM.

        Yesterday I came across a post here quoting my good friend Tacitus.

        Today I came across a post taking on one of the fiatocracy’s postmodern feminist-fanboy “authors” who merely exist to debauch, displace, and degrade the exalted context of the Great Books for Men.

        Books are those faithful mirrors that reflect to our mind the minds of sages and heroes. –Edward Gibbon

        Thomas Jefferson stated, “as we advance in life, they all fall off one by one, until one is left with Virgil and Homer, and perhaps Homer alone.” In his younger, clean-shaven years, Abraham Lincoln carried around a copy of Homer’s Iliad, and during his presidency he traveled with a well-worn copy of Shakespeare. Joseph Campbell tells us why we ought read the Greats—for they are the greatest possible mentors:

        Furthermore, we have not even to risk the adventure alone; for the heroes of all time have gone before us, the labyrinth is fully known; we have only to follow the thread of the hero-path. And where we had thought to find an abomination, we shall find a god; where we had thought to slay another, we shall slay ourselves; where we had thought to travel outward, we shall come to the center of our own existence; where we had thought to be alone, we shall be with all the world. — Joseph Campbell

        On a common journey we are all called. Without Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey, Virgil would have never penned the Aeneid, nor gone on to lead Dante through The Inferno and mentor Thomas Jefferson and Ludwig von Mises. In his later years Jefferson wrote, “as we advance in life these things fall off one by one, and I suspect we are left with only Homer and Virgil, perhaps with only Homer alone,” and Mises adopted Virgil’s “Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior Ito (Do not yield to misfortunes, but advance more boldly to meet them),” as his lifelong motto—words which formed the heroic premise of Austrian economics, echoing its poetic, moral premise of “Natural Rights, truth, morality, and justice in economics.” Dante’s journey in turn inspired the “Gold 45 Revolver/Ideas Have Consequences/Moral Premise” videogame research, alongside the Beatrice Game Engine and DantesInfernoGame.com, wherein Dante the poet must “boldy advance” through hell to regain Beatrice in Paradisio. Ultimately the Odyssey and Divine Comedy are love stories—the heroic rendering of ideals real so as to gain goddesses of heroic character. And if they are to become epic art and inspire a renaissance, tomorrow’s films, novels, and videogames must follow the classics’ lead. Oscar Wilde reminds us that life imitates art, and when we are allowed to battle for Constitutional ideals in modern novels, films, and videogames—for love, honor, and epic romance—for faith and the family—perhaps we will regain these entities in real life.

        While oceans and eras dvide us, classical, epic mythology unites us; as we find that East meets West upon the higher peaks of the human soul, where our better angels gather. The Buddha, Jesus, and Dante all resisted three temptations before embarking on their higher journeys; and all three journeys exalted truth, humility, love, and service over greed and avarice—over the seven deadly sins so eloquently rendered by Dante during his descent.

        As sure as Virgil lead Dante, Homer mentored Virgil, and Mises and Jefferson saluted Virgil and Homer, we ride with them all. The Greats are mentors of the immortal soul with whom I journey forth with—these are my best friends—these are the most courageous men I have ever met—who never turned tail, who never backed down, who never sold out—those far, far greater than I who I can only hope to aspire towards.

        Come join us–we happy, we few–come join the riders of the immortal soul. For the Renaissance awaits.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 6:57 pm King A (Matthew King)

        I look forward to speaking with the human being. I always thought you had interesting (if obsessive) ideas. And the fact that you express them here tells me you understand that the fight will be fought on this turf. It doesn’t matter what the war is about if there are no more men to fight it. That, and the scandalous fact that so few boys understand the answers are already there in the classics, repeated again and again and again for those with eyes to read them.

        I appreciate someone who is conversant in the “best that has been thought and said,” now that you can properly be called “conversant.” We have a generation of ignoramuses raised on the “wisdom” of Harriet Tubman and Chief Joseph. The remedial teaching required just to have an adult conversation is exhausting.

        Though you were tongue-and-cheek about the meds, not all of them are an evil. Yes we overprescribe, but I have seen them work miracles in the naturally chemically unbalanced. For the rest, it is just replacing one addiction with another, while tragically muting the dangerous spirit that used to produce great art.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 6:54 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Dear King A,

        I would like to let everyone know that I recently lost the Aderoll/Ritalin prescription the School Nurse prescribed be back in fourth grade when I asked, “Is it moral for the Federal Reserve banking cartel to print money and place the world in debt while the rest of us is supposed to work for for that money and pay taxes on it?”

        I got sent to the office and drugged up.

        But for the past few days I have been off my prescription, so da lzozozozzlzllzozllzozlosszlzozo and tremors have not been afflicting me quite as much lzozozzoz.

        LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 8:22 pm Firepower

        King A (Matthew King)

        Are you feeling okay? That was readable.

        Readable, for an economist
        About as helpful
        too!.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 12:07 pm King A (Matthew King)

        Readable, for an economist

        Baby steps.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 12:16 pm GeishaKate

        Well,
        no one
        does economy
        quite like
        you.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 1:52 pm Firepower

        u
        can haz
        spanking

        LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 11:25 pm (R)Evoluzione

        The readable part was copy-paste off another blog. Don’t worry, GBFM is still in full-lolzlollzlzm anti-butthex mode.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 9:42 am Firepower

        My friend, dear (R)Evoluzione
        Understand I do not require the South Park Version
        (in 85 short paragraphs, even)
        to comprehend economics
        or female wiles

        Now, if you want to discuss the preposterous statements there that get “massive upvote”

        and GBFM’s deft ignoring of the ultra-realistic videogame mentalities of: “let’s drop a cinderblock on scalzi’s fuckin’ head, man!”

        we can talk

        LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 7:04 pm Firepower

      Congrats! You’re comment 155,000 something over there. When you guys hit comment #1,555,000 you’ll have earned the right to only have 85% of your wages taken out in alimony.

      LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 12:13 pm M

      its not a game its life game s supposed to simplify reality. grasp smaller constructs, mb get a glimpse on bigger pic. but ye black ops is all about putting guns up terrorists ass, poor writing l0l and in civ u research democracy to get better economy or some other ridic shit

      LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 1:52 pm Firepower

      Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      hey hey heartistststessss!!! i have been working on my lanaguagagessz and have been postssing more ocoehernetly!!!!

      da spearhead mighty speareheead publsiehed some of my commentztztz lzozozozo:

      It was nice of you to moderate your style to fit the speardead cranial capacity.

      I mean, worrying about John Scalzi and sci-fi insults is fitting grist for your mill to mock. All that “that OUTRAGEIOUS john scalizi should get a brick on his head!!”

      Just like all that 3 years of griping really halted VAWA II dead in it’s tracks. I bet Scalzi is living in fear of being targeted by

      The Evil Male Patriarchy or whatever the kids call themselves.

      but, keep on lulzin…

      LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 2:10 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozolzoozzl

        yah da funny thing is wathicng all da ashat fanboyz voting AGAINST a vdeogame that would allow one to fight for the US Constitutsionz lzozlzo

        the Men’s Movement neds to look in da mirrioz llzozlzozooz

        dey are der own worts enenemeiz zlzlzozozoz

        whiners btcherz moanerz alll of dem zlzozo

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 2:31 pm Firepower

        haha
        the men’s “movement” cannot look in a mirror
        …they’ll see nothing
        staring back at them

        better to argue about “Jon Scalizi Sci-Fi OUTRAGE®!”
        for the umpteenth time,
        even if ya have to dredge up old laurels of
        Past Forum Victory! in the Glorious Posting War.

        How adorable – and safer – to stick online pins in a mythical VooDoo Doll effigy
        and declare “victory” by counting the number of thread “why i oughttas!!!”

        While VAWA II
        IRL
        sails on to victory after REAL victory.

        It’s like the King’s Royal Feast Procession marching by a shack of screeching whiners fighting over a picture
        of a chicken wing

        LikeLike


  5. on May 21, 2012 at 5:23 pm Oscar T. Slouch

    Good stuff I’m going to try this next time it seems intuitive as to why it would work.

    Lately, I’ve refused to give girls my last names which they try to get out of me after the 2nd or 3rd date. At first they act upset but I think it helps my game out as it gives me that mysterious vibe in a sense. I’m not on Facebook, twitter or LinkedIn anymore and I think it drives the few I’ve withheld the last name from to be more intrigued by me.

    Think about it, back before game I would give up my last name, date of birth, history, occupation, etc etc in the hope that those qualities and my honest honesty would get the girl to fall for me.

    But now. I don’t give them too much other than when it’s time to show vulnerability. What do I do for a living? Oh, I work in sales. How many long-term relationships have I had. Oh, at least…(counting on fingers for 10 seconds) 45! What’s my last name? Sheesh, you probably want to know my social security number and mother’s maiden name to don’t you.

    *Swoon*

    This may seem obvious as I right but it’s painful sometimes to see guys readily giving up such info to girls when they immediately meet or the first date. The girls I’ve done this kind of thing to usually have their eyes light up in a way because I’m showing them that I don’t care that they don’t hear the answer they want and I’m also retaining some power by not giving up my identity.

    When they keep pressing, I just roll my eyes and tell them sorry but I don’t give it up like that on the first night.

    Now the trick is to balance that out with real info so they don’t think you’re a killer with a past too hide (disadvantage though?) but I’ve noticed more success when I hesitate and playfully avoid their answer for the time being.

    This ties in to your friend above. From reading your post it seemed like he didn’t care what the girls thought of his nicknaming or if they were offended by being cut off. His grievances or annoyances were low on his priority list and that kind of self-centered behavior is probably attractive to women. The fact that you don’t jump into hoops to appease; you are the fucking prize. Worry about their worries later…if at all and if it makes sense to do so.

    -Oscar T. Slouch

    LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 5:32 pm Oscar T. Slouch

      ***My bad for the bad spelling/grammar.

      LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 5:36 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozlzoz yah watch dat speelelingsss you stsusitheadadas schchestkopf! lzozozozoozoz

        LikeLike


  6. on May 21, 2012 at 5:31 pm corvinus

    I once asked him half-seriously his secret to picking up women. He said, “I cut them off.” By that, he meant he would cut off their conversation to inject whatever stupid shit happened to pop into his head (and which, coincidentally, would move the discussion in a more fruitful sexual direction). “But isn’t that rude?” “Nah, not to girls. Guys would think it was rude, but guys aren’t girls.”

    I do that a lot, possibly due to genetics since my mom cuts people off too. I’ve been criticized for it repeatedly by my dad and some other family members, but now that I think about it, it hasn’t hurt me with women at all. I’ll relax and start considering it an asset, unless I’m in a straight-laced formal situation. That’s another source of diffidence blown away. Thanks, CH.

    LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 7:42 pm CooingDove

      This is the bit that would probably work on me. Sometimes it is a relief to have a guy just stop me talking, especially when I am not sure I am saying anything very sensible.

      I really like being patronised a bit and this goes well with that vibe.

      Dove

      LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 8:24 pm Firepower

        “Patronising” goes even better
        with patronizing
        here in USA

        It also meshes well with
        hair pulling, riding croppery – and a ballgag.

        LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 8:31 pm CooingDove

        He can’t pull my hair. It is too short. Don’t mind a spanking though.

        LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 8:39 pm CooingDove

        Firepower

        Picture this:

        LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 9:36 pm CooingDove

        That girl is not me of course (I wish). But I look a bit like her. Not as pretty but my legs might be as good. At 5 foot 9 they ought to be OK.

        LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 9:56 pm corvinus

        We get the picture.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 12:17 am CooingDove

        Check out the guys staring at her and taking pics at the bottom. Their lucky day! Chick looks like she just forgot to put her skirt and panties on. Well I guess she is famous now.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 12:28 am CooingDove

        Sorry got confused. Dumb brunette me. I meant this one:

        http://www.voyeurweb.com/winners/200907/20090722-111552/index.html

        Bottomless slut.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 8:34 am Firepower

        CooingDove

        Firepower

        Picture this:

        http://devlinoneill.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/cute5.jpg

        Yummerz.
        With your reddened asscheeks and
        about-to-pout countenance
        you look JUST LIKE
        my lil’ sister

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 12:57 pm Deutsch

        I see the comment section didn’t change much in my absence

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 2:05 pm Firepower

        Deutsch

        I see the comment section didn’t change much in my absence

        Well, at least it’s got
        one more than
        your blog

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 12:27 am gunslingergregi

        i knew there would be something lol

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 12:32 am CooingDove

        I meant the other photo. Sorry. The correct one is in moderation. Its the one with the bottomless girl in the crowd.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 12:34 am CooingDove

        What do you mean something, gunslingergregi?

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 1:28 am gunslingergregi

        he he he

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 1:41 am CooingDove

        God, I hate being teased. You bastard.

        Come on, what do you mean??

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 1:43 am CooingDove

        Please.

        This dove will coo if you tell her.

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 2:35 am gunslingergregi

        when you grow your hair longer you can send me a pic

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 2:47 am CooingDove

        I look good with short hair. My boyfriend likes it fine. I look a bit like that girl, except my skin is more ivory and I have blue eyes with my black hair. My boyfriend says my legs are my best feature.

        He says he likes the way I look with pale skin and short black hair (head and tail!)

        So I guess no pic.

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 3:33 am gunslingergregi

        You win for most “boyfriends” said in one comment but i’ll guarantee if your hair is too short to pull when he is hitting it from behind he is thinking about bob the marine down the street he he he

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 12:38 pm corvinus

        The only girls who can pull off a short-hair look are those with explosive T&A. In other words, they look good in spite of having short hair, not because of it.

        LikeLike


  7. on May 21, 2012 at 5:37 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    lzozozozozlz

    here aressz some more of my spearheadz postsss/wisdomz !! lzozzozlzlzo

    http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/05/20/clues-on-marriage-and-sex-during-roman-empire/

    Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM) May 21, 2012 at 09:05
    As Jesus came to fulfill the Law of the Prophets, and not to subvert it, all true Christians must be beholden to Genesis.

    “3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.”

    And so you see that most “Christian”s are far more beholden to the feminist fanboy fiatcoracy, than they are to the Bible and Christianity.

    Basically modern marriage is but a front for the system that enslaves men to lifelong servitude, which tempts and takes from them. When the fiatocracy recognized the power of women to convert worthless fiat dollars into physical property and wealth, they set about desouling women in college, and putting them to work in tempting and taking.

    No pimp would ever charge a man for past use of a pussy. But that is exactly what the marriage cartel does, fronted by ministers who are far more devious than any pimp ever was.

    Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM) May 21, 2012 at 08:37
    Hello Everyone,

    Thanks for the Tacitus!

    We hold the key to our renaissance and revival.

    It is the Great Books for Men!

    Every day, each and every one of you ought rebel against the feminist fanboy fiatocracy by not only reading, but *living,* by the Code of Honor in the following books:

    1. Homer’s Iliad
    2. Homer’s Odyssey
    3. The Bible (Genesis, Exodus, Matthew to begin!)
    4. Virgil’s Aeneid
    5. Joseph Campbell’s The Hero With a Thousand Faces
    6. Dante’s Inferno
    7. Aritsotle’s Poetic
    8. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
    9. Socrates’ Apology
    10. Melville’s Moby Dick
    11. The Declaration of Independence
    12. The U.S. Constitution

    Throw aside the “Tucker Max rhymes with Goldman Sax” which the feminist fanboy fiatocracy pens and promotes!

    Pick up the Great Books, each and every day, and as the author does here, quote their tenets and observations–quote their priceless principles–in your own works!

    For while America’s feminist fanboy fiatocracy s destined to decline, the Great Books Fellowship is immortal and eternal. Come join us–answer the call to adventure, voyage forth, and learn the news of your True Fathers!

    Man up not like Bill Bennett and Kay Hymowitz call you do, as they define manning up as paying alimony and child support for a bernankified/desouled vehicle of wealth transfer slut, but Man Up as Homer call you to do!

    Best,

    GBFM

    LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 2:01 pm beta_plus

      Why Melville? Not criticizing, just curious.

      LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 3:06 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        ummmmmm because he rox?

        lzozzoozzlzo

        read moby dick fucktard and then tell me why not melville lzozlzlozz

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 8:07 pm collapseofman

        Total singularity of purpose.

        LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 2:03 pm That Guy

      @GBFM,

      Most of the above books are subsumed by the seminal work of Sir James Fraser:
      “The Golden Bough”

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Bough

      This work puts all mythology – including various religions – into context, and leads to the conclusion that many people are born with an innate religiosity.

      For me though Religious-speak=Female/Emotional Non-Logical, so I have no truck with it.

      I’d advise all men to avoid religion, leave it with women, where it belongs by right.

      LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 2:22 pm CooingDove

        Some religious guys are sexy.

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 2:28 pm That Guy

        I guess… if you like a man who kneels to worship… 😉

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 3:53 am CooingDove

        Well, I kneel beside him.

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 2:25 pm HTTrader

        True religious life is being true to yourself and living by a set of principles. Something I think we can all agree is well within the male domain. 99% of religious leaders have always been men, after all, not women.

        The literature on this stuff these days is so corrupted, watered-down and therefore written for women (The Secret etc) that you would think none of these ideas are worth taking seriously but I’d disagree.. Emerson, Hesse, Whitman, just to add a few to what GBFM has already mentioned, these guys knew what they were talking about.

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 2:27 pm CooingDove

        Most of the leaders are men, the followers women. Women won’t follow a female religion.

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 2:35 pm That Guy

        I like girls I’m with to follow me… and am more than capable and willing to lay down the law for her, and guide her to a righteous life…

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 2:46 pm CooingDove

        I tend to follow the guy. Happy to. But I have mostly dated religious men. I like the patriarchal power that some traditional religious men have.

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 3:33 pm That Guy

        @Dove,

        I bring the Patriarchal Power, but without the trappings.

        With me a girl doesn’t go to church, but still gets to worship on her knees 😉

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 4:15 pm CooingDove

        That Guy, I am a classic woman, a follower. I am happy to “worship” a man’s cock and power on my knees. But I think it is God who gave him that patriarchal cock and power.

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 4:47 pm That Guy

        @Dove,

        You’re keen to please which is always a fine trait in a girl!

        However, I’ve been with a number of religious girls over the years and they’ve found that my masculine ways acted to buttress them against the travails of the world, and gave them a new window on life and liberty. Many ended up not feeling the need for traditional religion after a time with me.

        So what I’m saying is that girls quickly “get religion” being around me, and feel freed of their former constraints.

        http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=get+religion

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 5:01 pm CooingDove

        That Guy, I am keen to please men, including you. I respect men a lot. I think it goes God, Man, Woman. One reason I look up to men is because of that. I feel happy to think I have men and then God above me.

        That is why I like to be responsive to men, their questions, interests, needs and preferences.

        I was not kidding about getting on my knees to worship a cock. It is deeply satisfying to me.

        Your approval does matter to this girl. And that is partly because I believe you are made in the image of God and I am made in the image of man.

        Do you understand me, Sir?

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 5:14 pm That Guy

        @Dove,

        I understand all…

        The solution would be for you to service my Cock-head and contemplate me as a God-head, me thinks 😉

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 5:24 pm CooingDove

        LOL, That Guy. You already have a girl to service you. And I have a man to service.

        I was thinking about that skirt-and-no-panties question. How about I ask my bloke if he would like it? Then I might pluck up the courage just to please him.

        A skin tight mini-skirt and no panties, you say?

        What else is sexy when you go out?

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 5:52 pm CooingDove

        God, if I had a cock I would be arrogant like a man!

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 25, 2012 at 6:12 pm King A (Matthew King)

        Just. Awesome.
        Please tweet this.

        LikeLike


      • on May 25, 2012 at 6:21 pm CooingDove

        I would be so proud to have it tweeted.

        Really glad you like it, Matthew.

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 25, 2012 at 6:24 pm Anon

        +1
        For the tweet. I already have a cock.

        LikeLike


      • on May 25, 2012 at 6:29 pm GeishaKate

        So does Dove 😉

        LikeLike


      • on May 26, 2012 at 5:11 am CooingDove

        Really, Geisha? Can I expect it to arrive in the post soon? How do I attach it?

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 26, 2012 at 8:21 am GeishaKate

        Unless you have been the victim of a violent crime, it should be right there in your pants.

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 2:32 pm That Guy

        I live my life by a core set of principles and morals – but it’s got nothing to do with the lie that is religion.

        Weak men = Religious men

        You can’t build a solid house on a poor foundation, likewise you can’t build you a decent life on a foundational lie.

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 3:04 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozozolozozz

        stupid fucktardz

        religionz is for menz
        story is soul of work states aatstrsistlez
        moses god’s judgetnment thou shalt not steal thoul shalt ot buttcufukck buttfukck , thou shalt not fuck thy neighrbrbors wife

        all good manyly wisdom

        hwoeever, church is of mby an dfor womenz lzozozoz girly preachers hwo sancifity divorce butthext and alimonies and lavery and butthext lzozozozozo

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 3:42 pm That Guy

        Manly wisdom exists outside of religion, the fact that religion co-opt some universal truisms, does not make it true itself.

        Religion is for those men who don’t have the firepower to think for themselves, or those that can think for themselves, but don’t have the cohones to act on their principles.

        Basically it’s for those men who like to be followers and like their ideas to be second-hand.

        You can take that to the Bank 😉

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 3:46 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Hey FUCKFACE!!

        i don’t show up at your job and knock the cock outta your mouth, o stop tryingto tell me about GREAT MEN and GREAT BOOK FOR MENZ.

        You’re confusing da CHURCH descfreeted butthexetted ocrrupt bureuuacy HCURCH with da rugged, manly RELIGION YOU CRAZY FUCK!!!!

        DO YOU THINK YOU’RE SMARTER DAN EINSTEIN, YOU CRAZY FUCK FACE FUCKATARD?

        DO YOU THINK EISNTEINE EINSTEIN NEVER THOUGHT FOR HIMSELF YOU CRAZY INSUBORDINATE BATSARD SPAWN BTUTUT BUTTFUCKED FANBOY!!!

        DO YOU THINK YOU ARE GREATER THAN SIR ISSAC NEWTON YOU CRAZY FUCK CRAZY FUCK FUC FUCKFACE?

        YOU STUPID, STUPI STUPID FUCKTRAD FUCKHOLE!!!

        It is the perfection of God’s works that they are all done with the greatest simplicity. He is the God of order and not of confusion. And therefore as they would understand the frame of the world must endeavor to reduce their knowledge to all possible simplicity, so must it be in seeking to understand these visions. –Cited in Rules for methodizing the Apocalypse, Rule 9, from a manuscript published in The Religion of Isaac Newton (1974) by Frank E. Manuel, p. 120, quoted in Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton (1983) by Richard S. Westfall, p. 326, in Fables of Mind: An Inquiry Into Poe’s Fiction (1987) by Joan Dayan, p. 240, and in Everything Connects: In Conference with Richard H. Popkin (1999) by Richard H. Popkin, James E. Force, and David S. Katz, p. 124
         
        Albert Einstein: The highest principles for our aspirations and judgments are given to us westerners in the Jewish-Christian religious tradition. It is a very high goal: free and responsible development of the individual, so that he may place his powers freely and gladly in the service of all mankind. –

        Nicolaus Copernicus: My goal is to find the truth in God’s majestic creation.

        Galileo Galilei: God is known by nature in his works, and by doctrine in his revealed word.

        Francis Bacon: But any one who properly considers the subject, will find natural philosophy to be, after the word of God, the surest remedy against superstition, and the most approved support of faith. She is therefore rightly bestowed upon religion as a most faithful attendant, for the one exhibits the will and the other the power of God. Nor was he wrong who observed, “Ye err, not knowing the Scriptures and the power of God;” thus uniting in one bond the revelation of his will, and the contemplation of his power.

        Isaac Newton: All variety of created objects which represent order and life in the universe could happen only by the willful reasoning of its original Creator, Whom I call the Lord God.

        Max Planck: Religion and science demand for their foundation faith in God. For the former (religion), God stands foremost; for the latter (science), at the end of all thought. For religion He represents a basis; for science, a crowning solution towards a world view.

        Wernher von Braun : My experiences with science led me to God. They challenge science to prove the existence of God. But must we really light a candle to see the sun?

        Albert Einstein: The more I study science the more I believe in God.

        lzozozozlzoz yu fucktrad

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 5:54 pm CooingDove

        Yes, GBFM

        All geniuses. And all men!

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 6:20 pm That Guy

        @GayBooksForMen,

        Einstein was either an Agnostic or more likely an Atheist.

        Many of the founding Fathers were Deists, some were Agnostics, most were somewhat irreligious, none were fundamentalist Christians, or rabid churchmen, like you present yourself as.

        Get your facts straight, stop prostrating yourself before the Church – it’s just a form of mental slavery… shame on you… get off your knees, stand up and be a man!

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 7:34 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        HEY FUCKFACE!!!

        THOSE ARE EINSTIEN’S & NEWTON’S WORDS YOU CRAZY CRAZY CRAZY FUCK!!!!!

        EINSTEIN BELIEVED IN GOD YOU CRAZY FUCK FUCK BUTTCCKFUCKED FANBOY IDIDIOT!!!

        i know its not your fault as bernanke buttegucked da schools systemz lzozlozoo and told u that everyone was an atheietsts so they could buttfuck girls and tape it sectrely like tucker max rheyms itwh goldmans sax and call themeselves good and god when butthfifukng girls and taping it setctrley like tucker max rhyems iwth godl nan sax.

        BUT YOU CRAYZ STPUSDI BUTTUUCUCFKEIEIETRITY BUTTCUCKKFUXK STIP STUPOID SHITHEADD!!!

        EISNETIN BELEIVED IN GOD AN DLOVED GOD!!

        HERE ARE HIS QUOTES YOU CRAZY FUCKTARD!

        Albert Einstein Quotes on Spirituality

        I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts; the rest are details.
        Science without religion is lame. Religion without science is blind.
        My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind.
        The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.
        Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble.
        The scientists’ religious feeling takes the form of a rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection.
        There is no logical way to the discovery of elemental laws. There is only the way of intuition, which is helped by a feeling for the order lying behind the appearance.
        The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
        The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious; It is the source of all true art and science.
        We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality.
        Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the Gods.
        When the solution is simple, God is answering.
        God does not play dice with the universe.
        God is subtle but he is not malicious.
        A human being is a part of the whole, called by us Universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest-a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole nature in its beauty.
        Nothing will benefit human health and increase the chances for survival of life on Earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet.
        The man who regards his own life and that of his fellow creatures as meaningless is not merely unfortunate but almost disqualified for life.
        Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding.
        Only a life lived for others is a life worth while.
        The human mind is not capable of grasping the Universe. We are like a little child entering a huge library. The walls are covered to the ceilings with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written these books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. But the child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books—-a mysterious order which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects.
        The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing. One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of reality. It is enough if one tries merely to comprehend a little of this mystery every day. Never lose a holy curiosity.
        What I see in Nature is a magnificent structure that we can comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of humility. This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism.
        The finest emotion of which we are capable is the mystic emotion. Herein lies the germ of all art and all true science. Anyone to whom this feeling is alien, who is no longer capable of wonderment and lives in a state of fear is a dead man. To know that what is impenetrable for us really exists and manifests itself as the highest wisdom and the most radiant beauty, whose gross forms alone are intelligible to our poor faculties – this knowledge, this feeling … that is the core of the true religious sentiment. In this sense, and in this sense alone, I rank myself among profoundly religious men.
        The real problem is in the hearts and minds of men. It is easier to denature plutonium than to denature the evil spirit of man.
        True religion is real living; living with all one’s soul, with all one’s goodness and righteousness.
        Intelligence makes clear to us the interrelationship of means and ends. But mere thinking cannot give us a sense of the ultimate and fundamental ends. To make clear these fundamental ends and valuations and to set them fast in the emotional life of the individual, seems to me precisely the most important function which religion has to form in the social life of man.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 12:23 pm That Guy

        @GayBooks,

        Why would you quote Galileo, when “we” all know he was persecuted by the church for his scientific ideas, and felt the need to “soft soap” them, to avoid being killed?!

        Meanwhile, Newton who was a devoted Christian, and famously a virgin and possibly homosexual, also believed in magic and all kinds of other nonsense. So his pronouncements on religion fit a pattern of irrationality. I credit Leibniz with “the calculus”, not Newton – that’s just a conceit of the Anglosphere.

        BTW, I value precision of thought, not loquaciousness – as the latter displays poor mental tone.

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 7:00 pm King A (Matthew King)

        That Bi wrote:

        Most of the above books are subsumed by the seminal work of Sir James Fraser [sic]:
        “The Golden Bough”

        This work puts all mythology – including various religions – into context, and leads to the conclusion that many people are born with an innate religiosity.

        For me though Religious-speak=Female/Emotional Non-Logical, so I have no truck with it.

        I’d advise all men to avoid religion, leave it with women, where it belongs by right.

        Hey, some James Frazer! At least some atheist toolbags know to up their game past the Zeitgeist idiocy if they’re going to get anywhere.

        Christendom invented reason as you know it, twerp. Without theology’s assertion of nature’s intelligibility and its permission to study creation, you “rational” nerds would have been “subsumed” by pagan ritual or Muslim austerity. You ever wonder why the pagans didn’t survive to have an “Enlightenment”? Ever wonder why the Mohometans are still waiting for theirs? Of course you didn’t. I am speaking of things you cannot conceive, so satisfied you are in your inane preconceptions of religion and sexuality.

        The difference between the religious and irreligious is not the difference between women and men. It is the the difference between men and boys. Your freshman-year term-paper wisdom does not impress me.

        A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

        How about this? Send your sister over to my place tonight. I’ll subsume her with my seminal work. I’ll straight-up Sir-James her in the face. The Golden Boughkkake, I call it.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 12:07 pm That Guy

        @kinga,

        Did you just say:
        “Christendom invented reason”

        Wow, I guess the ancient Greeks were Christians, but just didn’t know it yet for a few more thousand years 😉

        Keep going, you’re hilarious…

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 10:04 pm King A (Matthew King)

        Did you just say:
        “Christendom invented reason”

        Reread the full sentence, halfwit. Your partial attention explains your partial education.

        I wrote “Christendom invented reason” [are you still with me son? four more words to go in the sentence, I think you can do it] “… as you know it.” The Athenian practices you think you’re familiar with were confined to a very brief period in a very small place. Those discoveries were carried to you via the copybooks of Christian monastics.

        Without the Christian unity of Theos and logos (which created the university), the lessons of Socrates would never have made it to you, and even if they did, they wouldn’t be comprehensible to you outside the Western veneration of the logos now so ingrained in our culture that ignoramuses like you have never had to understand its origin or impetus.

        I’m through slumming with you. I can feel myself getting dumber just revisiting this elementary material. It’s like trying to convince an obstinate sped to memorize the multiplication tables. After a while you just have to say, shut the fuck up and go eat your pudding in the corner.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 12:42 pm That Guy

        @kinga,

        As regards my sisters, they only cavort with Alpha males – so you would cum up very short 😉

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 10:13 pm King A (Matthew King)

        Is that your name for DVDA? Cavorting?

        Hint, lil brother. Don’t brag about how the pus-pouched venereal bags in your family get around, or their proud status as alpha pin cushions.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 10:37 pm That Guy

        @kinga,

        In case it weren’t obvious I do not own or read any PUA-type literature or materials – as they’re superfluous to me – except what I read on this blog over the last number of months.

        So what’s with this “DVDA” acronym, stop being such a “Game Nerd”… get out from your Mom’s basement and actually talk to girls.

        And for God’s (heh) sake, put away that “YOU MATTER” card, it screams of neediness and approval seeking of the worst kind, not to mention Rosie O’Donnell pop-psychology stupid….

        LikeLike


      • on May 25, 2012 at 6:18 pm King A (Matthew King)

        Wow. I actually overestimated you. No lowest common denominator is low enough.

        http://lmgtfy.com/?q=dvda+meaning

        And read that Rosie O’Donnell book before you pass judgment. It’s like what Heartiste would write himself if he were a famous fat lesbian.

        YOU DON’T MATTER.

        LikeLike


      • on May 30, 2012 at 12:50 pm That Guy

        @kinga (aka Turd Burden),

        Here’s a review of your favorite book:

        Rosie O’Donnell’s “Find Me”

        Dude, WTF, seriously WTF… that is a Lesbian “coming out” book

        Here’s a review of it – from Amazon – I don’t read Gay/Lesbian/Trans-Gendered material:

        “I am sure that if Rosie ever reads this book now she feels embarressed that such poorly written and scantly edited drivel ever made it into print. Putting aside the deeply inappropriate bond she forges with an unfortunate young woman whose situation O’Donnell repeatedly romanticizes and sensationalizes, the writing is bland and it seems every other sentence is cliched to the point of making me wince. The young woman, Stacie, in question, was raped by a youth minister, and O’Donnell can’t stop writing about it in oddly sappy, romantic, sensational way.

        The other problem is that O’Donnell steps WAYYY over the boundary between her adoption agency and her life in her relationship with Stacie. She is fanatically obsessed with Stacie and “saving” her. It is sick and sad. Indeed, O’Donnell even writes on page 74 “Stacie was now calling every night- okay, more than that. Three, four times a night. That’s weird, I know. You might want to stop reading right now. It’s gonna get kinda creepy.”

        And later, “talking to stacie was a reliving of my own pain. And although it’s hard to admit, I liked how it felt. Electric current, real. It made me feel alive, raw, and sad. I am a swamp person, and so was Stacie.”

        The disturbing part is that pretty much at least once every couple of pages she says something to the effect of “I don’t have good boundaries. I have a savior complex. I give too much. It’s unhealthy.” So she knows it’s unhealthy, but when she describes her relationship with Stacie she is so clearly deep in that kind of sick thinking. It’s upsetting.”

        I hope O’Donnell is in a better place now and looking back on this book, can see why it’s sick.

        Oh Matt… Come out, come out, wherever you are…

        LikeLike


      • on May 30, 2012 at 1:03 pm That Guy

        @kinga (aka Turd Burden)

        Ouch, that, “YOU DON’T MATTER” remark really smarts…

        Arguing with you is like being savaged by a lamb…

        You’re like the fat kid with glasses who won the state spelling bee and thinks he’s now a genius.

        When in fact you may actually suffer from Hyperlexia – ask your psychiatrist:
        http://www.autismkey.com/hyperlexia/

        In fact I won’t argue with you any more, as I keep slamming you to the mat, and now it’s going to just come off as abusive of me, to keep beating-up a defenseless retard.

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 8:06 pm collapseofman

        There are no men in the Golden Bough. There is no conflict. There is no grand adventure. There is no life. You’ve completely and totally missed the point.

        You may as well have handed someone a copy of The Wasteland and said, “Here, this is all the poetry you need.”

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 4:56 am CooingDove

        Can someone say what The Golden Bough is?!?

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 12:02 pm That Guy

        @Dove,

        Here’s the link again:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Golden_Bough

        If the man in your life is religious, get him this as a “stocking stuffer” – he might just appreciate you more for your efforts to understand the religious impulse.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 12:42 pm CooingDove

        That Guy

        Thank you very much. His birthday is coming up. I can try to order it.

        He is a Catholic and I am thinking of converting.

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 12:47 pm CooingDove

        Thanks, That Guy

        Yes, he is Catholic and I am thinking of converting.

        He might like this book. He reads a lot more than me.

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 11:59 am That Guy

        @Collapse

        If you want adventure stories, then read them…

        I’m talking about an analysis of all mystical systems, and deriving a reason for their existence and prevalence – this is a man’s book. I read it at 15 yo and felt it explained a lot.

        The point being if you read it, you don’t need to read other derivative works, as they’re all covered.

        The second book I’d recommend, which covers the analysis and reasons for all mating behavior is “The Red Queen”. If you are’t au fait with science, especially biology, then skip the first 1/3 of the book. Once you read and internalize this book, all “Game” related material will have context.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 4:38 pm collapseofman

        Until you understand that Fiction can be more real than Non-Fiction, you’re not gonna get it.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 12:38 pm Greg Eliot

        Most of the above books are subsumed by the seminal work of Sir James Fraser: “The Golden Bough”

        It’s statements like these that led to the coining of the term “sophomore”.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 3:46 pm That Guy

        @Greg,

        That’s the first book you should read, not the last 😉

        Then read the “Red Queen”, to set the context for seduction/game.

        The read “The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind” by Julian Jaynes – to understand the underpinnings of critical thinking

        This 3rd book details how “Consciousness” is only a relatively recent evolution, and how works such as the “Iliad” are products of pre-conscious or bicameral minds.

        More here:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicameralism_%28psychology%29

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 10:15 pm King A (Matthew King)

        Look out, ladies. He can go ALL NIGHT with the Wikipedia links, yo.

        LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 2:30 pm Jacques

      Have you forgotten to take your medication? Your grammar is much closer to the Cambridge standard than the Fiat standard.

      LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 3:07 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozlzzzoozozzllolzozlzlzlzllzzlzozl yah i foudne fineded itzz zlozlzozozozz zozlzozlzozlz my corpraooerets stae amphetiamines which they prsicifbe to me under rittialalzi and addreerlools so i can pay attention 2 my broing femeinsits pfproofesosors and memmroize eveyrthing they tell me about how m i must slave awayz 4 wormensz and da state zlzozozozoz

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 3:29 am Mr. Pointyface

        Hey GAyBlowjobs for Men– oops, that;’s an ad homonym attack, like your “fucktards”.

        I know it’s upsetting when people attack your invisible friend. It’s all right, remember in the Bible he comes and clears them all away, and the righteous are left standing, like in the very suckcessful “Left Behind” .

        Religion means never having to mind your own business. And there’s just no evidence, not a shred, ever.

        But if you like, it that’s fine.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 12:48 pm That Guy

        @Pointy,

        +1

        Look, I have a few friends who are dedicated “Pastafarians” – they have an unshakable belief in the “Great Spaghetti Monster in the Sky”. Do I try and reason with them – no, as there is no evidence that can shake their belief for things unseen and unknowable.

        In other words, Belief is not amenable to Reason.

        LikeLike


      • on May 27, 2012 at 1:12 pm King A (Matthew King)

        an ad homonym attack

        That is one spectacularly multidimensional malapropism! It may be the first time the word “hominem” was confused with its homonym “homonym.” If you hadn’t just demonstrated your rank stupidity, I’d think your wordplay was intentional and clever as fuck — maybe even genius. As it is, I doubt you have any idea you understand what I’m saying even now.

        Two cheers? One-and-a-half?

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on May 30, 2012 at 5:08 am Mr. Pointyface

        Was well aware and outscored you on the GRE’s; unless you got 800/800, bitch.

        Now tell us about your special, invisible friend who isn’t just a rebrand of what the Zoroastrians believed.

        LikeLike


      • on May 30, 2012 at 5:27 pm King A (Matthew King)

        Your immediate recourse to qualifying yourself with a test score is all the supporting evidence I need. Cheers.

        You mean my faith was based on Zarathustra and nobody but GRE aces noticed for 2000 years? Do tell more. Give me a few smug paragraphs on Horus too. I find internet-fueled, postmodern deconstruction of half-remembered survey courses on religion fascinating.

        LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 4:28 pm Rex

      The Iliad isn’t even completed though

      LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 5:52 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        wot?

        fucktard?

        did someoens cut your skull in tow and butthext i your brain out of your head?

        wtf ru talling about

        buutututholfufkcker zloolzlzoz

        LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 5:47 pm gunslingergregi

      Hamlet is some good stuff puts a lot of things in perspective

      LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 5:51 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        yah da neoeonehctchs deoconsturcted HAMELET and replaced it iwth

        “TO BUTTHEXT OR NOT TO BUTTHEXT, THAT IS THE WQUESTIONZZZ lzozozlzlo”

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 1:44 am 50 million finnegans wakes flying way above their fuckin heads

        And let those that play your clowns
        speak no more than is set down for them,
        for there be of them THAT WILL THEMSELVES LAUGH [LOZLOZLOZLOZL],
        to set on some quantity of barren spectators
        to laugh too,
        THOUGH IN THE MEANTIME SOME NECESSARY QUESTION OF THE PLAY BE THEN TO BE CONSIDERED.
        That’s villainous, and shows a most pitiful ambition
        in the fool that uses it. Go make you ready.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 12:09 pm GeishaKate

        Scene stealer!

        LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 7:58 pm collapseofman

      Phenomenal. Solid choice on Campbell. I’d throw Zorba the Greek in there too.

      LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 12:51 pm That Guy

        @Collapse,

        Campbell is but a footnote to Frazier, and has acknowledged his indebtedness to him. But if volume of words (quantity) is more important than precision (Quality), then “knock yourself out”, as we say in NYC.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 10:27 pm King A (Matthew King)

        Which is it? Fraser or Frazier?

        Peppy little 15-year-old never quite went away, did he? if you get the book that unlocks all the secrets, what’s the point of ever cracking open another one again? Especially when the one you stumbled upon just so happens to have “subsumed” all the best that has been thought and said for five thousand years!

        I read Ayn Rand at 17. I outgrew her by 18. You have to keep chugging along, sparky, you gotta get some real traction to ascend the heights. You are a case study is spinning your wheels, and thinking you got somewhere.

        Matt

        P.S. It’s Frazer. If you’re going to affect a pose of intellectual insight, at least double-check for the most obvious signals of your puerility and inability to retain detail.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 11:26 pm That Guy

        @kinga,

        Niggler please!

        On your next baby step towards adulthood, I recommend the following book, “The Young Carthaginian”, on the life and times of Hannibal Barca, and the backdrop to the Punic Wars – as a good intermediate read for you:

        http://www.amazon.com/The-Young-Carthaginian-G-Henty/dp/1407630229

        Oh and btw, I finished it before my 5th birthday, so it should hit the mark with you.

        LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 11:55 pm Tom Paine

      If you have an ipad/kindle, most of these are free via Amazon.

      LikeLike


    • on May 24, 2012 at 1:38 am King A (Matthew King)

      Great books specifically for men? Then why the dithering Hamlet instead of Henry V or Coriolanus or the “murderous Machiavel” Richard III? Just go with the “Annotated Complete Works” to cover all your bases. Especially if the library of books known as “The Bible” only takes up one slot.

      Glaring omissions:

      Sophocles’ Antigone
      Aristophanes’ Lysistrata
      Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War
      Plato’s Republic, Symposium, Gorgias, Laches
      Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Politics, Rhetoric
      Sun Tzu’s Art of War
      Plutarch’s Parallel Lives
      Augustine’s Confessions, City of God
      Aquinas’ Summa Theologica
      Thomas à Kempis’ Imitation of Christ
      Ignatius of Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises
      Machiavelli’s Discourses on Livy
      Hobbes’ Leviathan
      Milton’s Paradise Lost
      Pascal’s Pensées
      Rousseau’s Emile
      Smith’s Wealth of Nations
      Hamilton/Jay/Madison’s Federalist
      Tocqueville’s Democracy in America
      Dostoevsky’s Brothers Karamazov
      Austen’s Pride and Prejudice
      Baltimore Catechism, No. 2 (1885)
      Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil, Thus Spoke Zarathustra
      Kipling’s Collected Poetry
      Conrad’s Heart of Darkness
      Boy Scouts of America Handbook (1911)
      Catechism of the Catholic Church
      United States Marine Guidebook of Essential Subjects
      Mansfield’s Manliness
      Bowman’s Honor: A History
      Heartiste’s Crimson Arts
      Rosie O’Donnell’s Find Me

      LikeLike


      • on May 25, 2012 at 1:53 pm That Guy

        @kinga recommends,

        Rosie O’Donnell’s Find Me

        Dude, WTF, seriously WTF… that is a Lesbian “coming out” book

        Here’s a review of it – from Amazon – I don’t read Gay, Lesbian or Trans-Gendered material:

        I am sure that if Rosie ever reads this book now she feels embarressed that such poorly written and scantly edited drivel ever made it into print. Putting aside the deeply inappropriate bond she forges with an unfortunate young woman whose situation O’Donnell repeatedly romanticizes and sensationalizes, the writing is bland and it seems every other sentence is cliched to the point of making me wince. The young woman, Stacie, in question, was raped by a youth minister, and O’Donnell can’t stop writing about it in oddly sappy, romantic, sensational way.

        The other problem is that O’Donnell steps WAYYY over the boundary between her adoption agency and her life in her relationship with Stacie. She is fanatically obsessed with Stacie and “saving” her. It is sick and sad. Indeed, O’Donnell even writes on page 74 “Stacie was now calling every night- okay, more than that. Three, four times a night. That’s weird, I know. You might want to stop reading right now. It’s gonna get kinda creepy.”

        And later, “talking to stacie was a reliving of my own pain. And although it’s hard to admit, I liked how it felt. Electric current, real. It made me feel alive, raw, and sad. I am a swamp person, and so was Stacie.”

        The disturbing part is that pretty much at least once every couple of pages she says something to the effect of “I don’t have good boundaries. I have a savior complex. I give too much. It’s unhealthy.” So she knows it’s unhealthy, but when she describes her relationship with Stacie she is so clearly deep in that kind of sick thinking. It’s upsetting.

        I hope O’Donnell is in a better place now and looking back on this book, can see why it’s sick.

        Matt, come out, come out, wherever you are…

        LikeLike


    • on May 24, 2012 at 3:51 am CooingDove

      God, I have hardly read any of those. A couple of them I will have to look up! Thanks for the list though.

      ““3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.””

      That rings true.

      Dove

      LikeLike


  8. on May 21, 2012 at 6:33 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    I agree with the above poster that in the wrong hands this can veer too close to Rob Schneider’s SNL routine. But there are other ways to do this. When you get introduced to “Sara,” for example, you can ask “Lee?” and follow up by wondering where the cheesecake is. Etc. Ask Hailey if she uses Comet to clean with…ask Monica if she works in an office..and oval office…

    LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 7:43 pm King A (Matthew King)

      It absolutely depends on the delivery. If you’re grinning like a baboon (“LOOK AT HOW CLEVER MY WORDPLAY IS!!!”), or so much as hint at breaking consistency, you’ve blown it. Maybe 20-25% is the actual cleverness of the content.

      The self-conscious delivery makes you look like a clown trying hard to earn her amusement. The deadpan delivery flips the script on its head, first making her wheels spin figuring out whether it’s a joke (absent all the normal non-verbal tells her airhead relies on), then by making her insecure, wondering if she’s not sophisticated enough to get the joke. Grinning at yourself gives it away, so does the twinkle in your eye. In effect you are allowing her the power to judge the humor content of your routine.

      Watch comedians. Audiences laugh at delivery and context, not content. And when a chick’s pretty little brain figures out a sophisticated joke all by her pretty little self, she is genuinely excited for her accomplishment and grateful to the teller. I’m at the big girls’ table!

      Matt

      LikeLike


  9. on May 21, 2012 at 6:48 pm alphamission

    Any tips on what names to use for Marry/Fuck/Kill?

    LikeLike


  10. on May 21, 2012 at 6:50 pm Vagbooger

    First timer schlong timer. FMK works like a charm, actually did the field test a couple of weekends back. Got all parties in a goofy pleasant mood. Was doing a decent job countering shit tests from a 5-6 depending on your tastes red head who was shapely with great pert D’s being her only saving grace flaunting them braless like Sue Ellen Mishke. Lolzlolz was following her into the bathroom because she had some Bolivian marching powder and again was confronted with a “why are you following me into the bathroom test” and I just told her to come see me when she is done in timeout. Didn’t hit paydirt but the satisfaction on how to generate the desired responses and more would had been oblivious to me without my older brother showing me the redpill side of things a couple years ago. Still got my work cut out but I feel I’m headed in the righteous direction.

    LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 8:30 pm The Man of Mystery

      Better response would have been “Because you’re going into the men’s room, and I need to drain the sword. Is there something I should know about you?” said completely straight faced and deadpan.

      LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 8:55 pm Vagbooger

        Haha, that would had been better considering her ever increasing level of cuntiness. I left out the part of the story that this was the afterparty at a hotel room. Couple cases of beer and was with my chick friend and we met up earlier that night with another chick friend of hers who got the room. I was using chick friend as a prop to promote some DHV and she voluntarily invited herself back to the room despite nobody knowing her from Adam. I was following her into the rooms bathroom and was met with her atypical indignant behavior. But I kept my frame in bemused mode and ended up doing the majority of her stash and loved the part when she wore out her welcome with the girls by her rude behavior towards me… hehe I love how girls will mercilessly gang up on dumb cunts like her.

        LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 10:36 pm The Whammer

      OK. So to sum this all up you didn’t shag some ordinary 5-6 girl.

      LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 11:27 pm Vagbooger

        Nope, can’t win them all despite my escalating and kino; she was just plain insufferable and fancied herself 2 points higher than she really was. My game is not even close to airtight but I’ve done much worse and gotten more favorable results in other past situations. The final straw was her yapping on her phone trying to invite some random guy “friend” up to the room but I got my chick friend and her friend riled up and they basically told her that unless she came back to the room to hang with me than there was no reason for her being there. She got pissed and asked them why they were making her out to be a whore and they gave her the boot there after. Besides I still had a good time and got the majority of her stash and enjoyed the fact that I was not outcome dependant like I have been in the past. I pushed for it of course but it was second nature and didn’t feel contrived or like laborous.

        LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 11:46 pm gunslingergregi

        was not outcome dependant like I have been in the past
        ”””’
        you have gotten better then.

        LikeLike


  11. on May 21, 2012 at 7:52 pm wizardcorpse

    “I cut them off”
    very important even in boxing: cutting the ring, in the seduction ring it is also important to lead the conversation in your direction. and thanks for the clarification, usually you will have 2nd thoughts about being “rude” but at least its confimed that it is even vital.
    “you never listen to me”
    you’re doing it right-but that is in LTRs
    so its vital in Pickup as well

    LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 3:47 pm timtebowdancer

      Horrible analogy. In boxing, cutting off the ring is cornering your opponent. It’s the reason Ali had to switch to rope a dope against Foreman. Foreman was cutting off the ring too well for him to stick and move.

      In conversation, cutting them off is simply interrupting.

      Terrible terrible analogy.

      The closest conversational analogy to cutting off an opponent in boxing would be using socratic method to work them into a position where any answer to a single question will be either completely ridiculous or the exact opposite of what they’d been arguing from the get go. I had a law school prof was a goddamn jedi knight with this sorta thing. I honestly don’t even know how he did it so well.

      Anyway, horrible analogy.

      LikeLike


      • on May 31, 2012 at 8:38 pm wizardcorpse

        yeah, as horible as your logical capacity. cutting off an oponenet in the ring means cutting his MOMENTUM and gameplan. in relationships a woman has a natural momentum for bullshiting the conversation so you cut it from time to time for the one of your own.
        Anyway, horrible logic

        LikeLike


  12. on May 21, 2012 at 8:24 pm The Man of Mystery

    holy shit. EPIPHANY. Interrupting women = pussy flood. I just realized that i’ve always done this, AND that it’s probably netted me insane amounts of tail. I get bored with women’s inane conversations and interject whatever random funny and/or sexual shit pops into my head without smoothing the transition in the least. The interesting thing is that it’s not that I do it knowing the power it holds – it’s that I genuinely have no patience for conversation that is less amusing and/or witty than the banter that I can come up with. I don’t want to hear about the shoe sale down the street. Fuck you. Few men can keep up with my wit and NO women can. That shit fries circuits.

    In short, I lead the conversation where I want it to go and most women respond drippingly…even when it runs counterintuitive to what women SAY they want (a guy who listens, lets them speak first, is polite etc) when I interject “you know who has some nasty fucking cankles? Janet Reno” in the middle of the girl telling me some preposteriously uninteresting story about how her shoe came off at work and it was SO annoying…

    Women love to be interrupted by cocky assholes making fun of whatever they do, say, or wear – as long as it’s genuinely playful and fun and not asshole-ish in a butthurt bitter beta way. Concept reinforced.

    LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 8:49 pm wizardcorpse

      WAIT A SECOND! could it be? that women do that nonesense on purpose becase they WANT YOU TO INTERUPT THEIR SHIT BECASUE THEY ENJOY IT??
      WE’re GENIOUS!!!
      LOL

      LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 9:15 pm CooingDove

      Man of Mystery, I believe you about women’s inane conversation. God, they even bore me sometimes. And I like wit from a guy, but sometimes I can’t keep up with the guys banter and I just end up with this silly smile on my face. I can feel it.

      I love hanging around sometimes with smart, funny guys but it can be a bit much sometimes.

      LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 10:43 pm The Whammer

      I’m sure that you get “insane amounts of tail” 🙂

      LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 2:25 am The Man of Mystery

        I’m not a woman, so I don’t have a hamster. so sorry.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 9:24 am lavacious

        Men have hamsters too.

        [heartiste: sure they do. but the male hamster is much smaller and gets winded more quickly than the female hamster. it’s a difference of degree so large that it might as well be a difference of kind.]

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 1:46 pm maya

        Heartiste, do you have a post on your blog where you explain what exactly female hamster is? I want to know … if I become aware of my hamster I can probably remove him from my brain, can I?

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 4:53 pm doug1111

        Female rationalization, self deception and solipsism.

        LikeLike


      • on May 31, 2012 at 8:40 pm wizardcorpse

        hmmm.. must be a subspecies of hamsterus kingdom and domain

        LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 4:56 pm doug1111

      Changing topics a lot, yeah by interrupting her, and semi randomly, to non serious but light and people centered topics, and esp. stories, is chick crack.

      LikeLike


  13. on May 21, 2012 at 8:27 pm The Man of Mystery

    On another point, I think the key is to share your opinion in an uncaring, I don’t-give-a-shit-what-anyone-thinks way about things without being asked, constantly. For example in conversation dropping “you know what really chaps my ass? People that wear sandals and socks. Fuck that, people that wear sandals period. You’re not jamaican, and it’s not 1990.” Women want talking points on things that don’t really mean much besides being interesting, witty, marginally funny talking points. It’s your job to make sure the conversation’s zeitgeist stays firmly centered on them.

    LikeLike


  14. on May 21, 2012 at 9:05 pm J

    This sums up where society is heading: Man Fathers 30 Children With 11 Women, Wants Bailout http://nation.foxnews.com/weird-stories/2012/05/21/man-fathers-30-children-11-women-wants-bailout

    LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 9:16 pm wizardcorpse

      why not just deny that he’s the father and fly far far away:
      the end.
      on the other hand he wouldnt be able to pass his surname if he does that, but if no other options are available I suggest he make a run for it, then produce 30 more in a different country.

      LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 9:58 pm corvinus

      That’s why blacks are growing at 2%+ per year worldwide. They probably would be too in the US if they weren’t getting so many abortions. They’re human dogs. And I’m being generous about the “human” bit. (How many more of this guy’s spawn were aborted? Most likely another 30 or so!)

      LikeLike


      • on May 21, 2012 at 10:44 pm wizardcorpse

        well, at but I guess my proposal would be much better , since that guy in the link wanted to take your tax payed money to raise his next generation. seriously are you kidding me? but who can blame him, i’d do the same thing if america will give me willingly your money (from taxes) to subsidize for my own shit

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 1:14 pm Anonymous

        She spread her legs for someone who made no promises so she can go find a beta to help her raise the children and her parents can pitch in. Gramma would love to raise the child.

        LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 10:22 pm Anonymous trollthing

      The man is handsome. What’s so wrong with him fathering 30 kids?

      [heartiste: you have low standards.]

      LikeLike


      • on May 31, 2012 at 8:41 pm wizardcorpse

        yeah but father them NOT with our taxes and oh yeah, your taxes too moron

        LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 1:13 pm Anonymous

      But this kind of condemnation of the left wing black alpha is precisely what caused the GOP to join the Democrats in turning the screw of mandated child support since the 1980’s when the authoritarian Christians took over the GOP like the libertarians are doing now in reverse.

      The whole family court disaster we’re facing now comes from our own condemnation of “irresponsible black men” during the eighties.

      LikeLike


  15. on May 21, 2012 at 10:18 pm Anonymous trollthing

    “I knew a guy who was a natural with women”

    i.e. a man who didn’t give a shit about progressivism, and women loved his jerkish, alluring behavior.

    [heartiste: ftfy]

    LikeLike


  16. on May 21, 2012 at 10:36 pm Serenety

    Off Topic – possible reasons for cuckoldry

    Why alpha-male baboons allow subordinates sex treats

    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18366-why-alphamale-baboons-allow-subordinates-sex-treats.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news

    LikeLike


  17. on May 21, 2012 at 10:42 pm walawala

    I was on a plane and got seated beside a HB8. It was a 2 hour flight and I immediately started with an indirect opener:

    Me: Could they make these seats any smaller…

    She was also as tall as me

    Me: You’re tall

    She smiled and we started talking. I negged and got her interest, then moved quickly into “comfort”.

    One way I have found is that running the Cube is a great way to 1) build comfort and 2) demonstrate higher value.

    I ran the Cube on her and I then number closed her. I texted her at midnight that night and she replied in 2 seconds.

    The one thing the Cube does do is that if she’s attracted she’ll start shit-testing.

    The plane game girl was all: “So do you do this to all the girls you meet on planes?”

    Me: Yes…all of them….

    LikeLike


  18. on May 22, 2012 at 12:28 am gunslingergregi

    Me: Yes…all of them….””””’

    he’s out of control

    LikeLike


  19. on May 22, 2012 at 9:13 am Other

    My sense of humor always killed my chances with girls. It would always go right over their head and I’d end up with blank expression. Meanwhile some jerk with a second graders level of humor who would just make bad puns and always killed with the girls. I never resented him for it, I would just shake my head at the dimwittedness of the girls.

    LikeLike


  20. on May 22, 2012 at 10:15 am chris

    http://www.bakadesuyo.com/10-ways-science-explains-why-james-bond-is-so

    LikeLike


  21. on May 22, 2012 at 10:54 am YaReally

    A big part of speed seduction is basically taking someone you’ve just met and creating the feeling in them that they’ve known you for years. A lot of PUA stuff is based around this:

    – venue changes (don’t try to just go to dinner then your place. Meet at your place for a sec, then go to dinner, then head to a cozy pub but drop into a convenience store on the way, etc etc THEN go back to your place, each new venue/situation you’re in together solidifies the “us vs the world” feeling)

    – The Cube (and similar gimmicks, which make the chick think you know her to her core the way no one else does…the attraction this builds if you pull it off is fucking scary)

    – Cold Reads (similar to The Cube but shorter/faster and sometimes negative, either way it’s basically calling someone out on something the way you would a close friend)

    – Teasing (the way a brother teases his little sister, it breeds familiarity)

    – etc etc etc.

    Basically PUAs looked at “what triggers build familiarity and how can we create routines based on this that skip all the in-between stuff and just flip the triggers ASAP?” It’s like people naturally have a giant cluttered room full of light switches spread out all over and PUAs said “fuck walking all the way around the room, let’s put the light switches all on one panel by the entrance”. I’ll build the same connection in an hour at the bar that a normal guy would build with a girl over months or years.

    This concept of familiarity goes beyond seduction of women, it’s a good people skill in general. You can use it to get a girl opening up about her bisexual experiences and what color underwear she’s wearing 2 minutes after meeting her, or you can use it to land yourself a job in an interview or free drinks from AMOGs or get help from strangers or help people who are depressed.

    I make guy-friends easily because I build a connection with them quickly. Often it’s guys with high status that are intrigued (so I get job offers, invites to stuff, introduced to their social circles, etc) because they’re used to playing the fake-polite-persona game with other high status guys where everyone is kind of bullshitting eachother and you don’t really get to know the other person’s real personality for a while. Then I come in and plow through all that and show I’m not putting on a front (authenticity) so they drop their persona and we connect deeper and faster (no homo) than normal to them which is a surreal experience to them and they grasp at keeping in touch because they know they just ran into something special (no homo lol)

    Girls will often tell me “I don’t get it, we’ve just met but it feels like I’ve known you forever…” and guys will tell me “Man I just met you but I can tell you’re a good guy, seriously dude” (which is bro-speak for having a man-crush lol)

    I wouldn’t use the name thing myself but Russel Brand does it in the middle of an interview with Carrie Keegan on YouTube. She already likes him in it though so he can say/do anything and she loves it.

    LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 12:12 pm King A (Matthew King)

      … taking someone you’ve just met and creating the feeling in them that they’ve known you for years.

      Very well put. It should be a maxim.

      LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 9:25 pm Firepower

        You’ll have to pay
        Dale Carnegie
        royalties

        LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 2:16 pm Tweet query

      What the heck is “The Cube” and “Cold Reads”?

      LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 5:15 pm doug1111

        Cold read is something like: You like tall guys don’t you (if she’s medium height or above and your tall).

        “You’re the one that ended your last relationship aren’t you?”

        I don’t like the Cube much, it’s too well known by beginners at pua and seems canned. if you google pua techniques cube I ‘m sure you’ll find it.

        I like another psychological game a lot better, The Love Test. It’s less well known and it’s about psychology surrounding male female relationship interactions.

        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2009/06/02/the-love-test-a-routine/

        But really I don’t use routines much. Do do cold reading though but more when i do have some intuitions about the girl, not usually right off the bat. Even if you get them wrong it’s not really harmful and may lead to a followup intuition that’s right.

        LikeLike


      • on May 25, 2012 at 5:19 pm doug1111

        Why is this post in permanent moderation? Yeah this ship has sailed, or model sailboat, but why? Weird.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 5:38 pm Anon

        http://lmgtfy.com/?q=the+cube+pua

        http://lmgtfy.com/?q=cold+reading+pua

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 9:28 pm Firepower

        What the heck is “The Cube” and “Cold Reads”?

        SO THIS explains how the 2012 ‘puas’
        cut n’ paste mystery’s old routines
        and make a mint

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 10:32 pm King A (Matthew King)

        I know. Does the repetition get old for anyone else here?

        We’ve mastered checkers. We want to play chess.

        LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 5:18 pm andrewmichaelmedina

      Why don’t you have your own blog already? Your comments are some of the most concise, informative pieces of content on here.

      LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 2:38 am realerthanmost

        x2… great info as usual.

        LikeLike


    • on May 24, 2012 at 10:46 pm aspic

      ” interject whatever random funny and/or sexual shit pops into my head without smoothing the transition in the least.
      ”
      “In short, I lead the conversation where I want it to go ”

      I need help with this shit. I’m a hardcore introvert. Trying to think around people hurts.

      As with all things “practice” is probably the answer. But any useful mental tricks would be helpful.

      Interested in how you build familiarity and make friends with guys quickly. I understand where you are coming from and would like to develop that feeling of “authenticity” in my personality because it’s something that I highly value.

      LikeLike


  22. on May 22, 2012 at 11:31 am garicov

    http://gma.yahoo.com/jersey-woman-she-fired-being-too-busty-015114881–abc-news-topstories.html

    Gloria Allred is at again!

    “When my supervisors suggested that I tape down my breasts, I asked ‘Are you kidding me?'” Odes said. “The supervisor said, ‘Just cover up a little more.'”

    The female supervisor then walked over to a closet, pulled out a bright red bathrobe decorated with pictures of guitars, and told Odes to put it on, she said.

    “The treatment was discriminatory, profoundly humiliating and unlawful,” Allred said.

    LikeLike


  23. on May 22, 2012 at 11:41 am Paul Gay

    Woman dates prisoner, gets his name tattooed on his forehead:

    http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/tz45c/she_chosepoorly/c4qynmk

    LikeLike


  24. on May 22, 2012 at 12:54 pm gunslingergregi

    dam paul that dude been in jail for 17 years shit
    lent a car to someb0ody that was aquited of murdering somebody da fuc
    why i like the muslims execution is not punishment for the murderers but mercy on the occasional innocent.

    that tattoo shit though your name on a chick hell yea that’s when ya know you are doing it right lol

    LikeLike


  25. on May 22, 2012 at 1:01 pm gunslingergregi

    Stressed men — i.e. beta males — are more social. When you’re in a bind, you want allies.
    ””””’
    if i end up having to handle my business it will be me alone

    LikeLike


  26. on May 22, 2012 at 2:16 pm Tweet query

    Heartiste–

    From your Twitter, because there’s not other place to ask, what is “disparate ability”?

    LikeLike


  27. on May 24, 2012 at 10:45 pm aspic

    Constantly finishing a girls sentences for her is also useful.

    A friend of mine has this personality quirk where he will habitually finish every sentence you try to get out for you when he gets bored. It’s fucking annoying but chicks seem to love it. I suppose it’s the whole “omg he totally gets me!” thing.

    LikeLike


    • on May 25, 2012 at 1:03 am CooingDove

      aspic

      Dominant conversation more likely!

      Dove

      LikeLike


  28. on May 24, 2012 at 11:15 pm Fast-tracking Familiarity « yareallypua

    […] In response to: https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/fast-tracking-familiarity/ […]

    LikeLike


  29. on May 25, 2012 at 12:58 am yareallypua

    Reblogged this on YaReallyPUA and commented:
    test

    LikeLike


  30. on May 25, 2012 at 3:05 pm Gouverneur Morris

    OT: but thought you might find this interesting.

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/05/is-john-edwards-flirting-with-a-female-juror/

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    redlightgo on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    redlightgo on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Lichthof on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Lichthof on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Peter Jackson on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Dr.Benway on “Conspiracy Theory…
    Dr.Benway on “Conspiracy Theory…
    Dr.Benway on “Conspiracy Theory…
    Sentient on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Sentient on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Manifest Depravity
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: