Regular readers who follow my (admittedly, attenuated) take on the PUA scene know that I consider Krauser to be one of the few bona fide pickup artists out there. It’s why I have his blog linked on the right under “Game”.
Krauser adheres to an “indirect-direct” daytime approach style that suits my personality well, so I’m perhaps a bit partial in my praise. Daygamers who use different approach techniques shouldn’t feel put off; remember, the core concepts behind most of the game styles are essentially the same, with the exceptions being the distinctions inherent in day vs night game, club vs everywhere else game, and native vs foreign game. Even those exceptions, as stark as their differences may seem to newbies, share a lot of critical game principles. Female hypergamy — the cosmic force that underpins much of the game technology geared to leveraging it in a man’s favor — is a universal phenomenon, after all. So if I praise one PUA school of thought you can consider it tangential praise of other PUA schools of thought.
This is not to say there don’t exist shysters out there whose sole intent is to make a buck off the woes of desperate losers in love. But Krauser (and a few others) strike me as the real deal, so I don’t have a problem promoting them. In that vein, here’s a trailer to an interview of Krauser by a group called London Real.
The full one-hour interview is here.
Also, as I’ve said before whenever I feature a PUA or a game instructor, if any reader has real life experience learning from or hanging out with these guys, whether those experiences are good or bad, feel free to discuss it in the comments, or email me for a possible future post. Don’t bother trolling. I have expert-level skills at sniffing out trolls and petty haters.

I’ve seen some of his online videos- they seem real (that is, not staged) but I suspect that sort of on-the-street method might freak out or put off some women- compared to other day-game venues like coffee shops, bookstores, etc.
LikeLike
Krauser is totally real, I been out with him and he has some crazy skills. Also he doesn’t post them up but he has a fair number of his lays on film. Mans a monster.
LikeLike
The full video was pretty good. Watched it this AM before my workout. It’s cool that he gives Mark Manson’s book a shout-out, says it’s good. I haven’t read it for lack of any solid reviews. Maybe I’ll pick it up. Krauser also frequently mentions this blog & Rollo too.
The beta in the American dude, Brian, is quite strong. It’s clear he’s uncomfortable with many topics of conversation in the interview, and at a few points he makes some feeble white-knight noise about some of Krauser’s generalizations.
Good shit overall, and it shows that game science is becoming mainstream. The London Real’s FB page got some sad-feminist comments after the interview.
LikeLike
His greatest revelation was “it’s about being more invested in yourself than in her and others”. That’s where the rubber meets the road.
LikeLike
“You don’t get young, beautiful feminists, they don’t exist.”
Man, that’s a big 10-4.
LikeLike
I don’t know about now, but there were more young and beautiful (on the outside) feminist in the 90s than you could shake a stick at. And it required little or no game to bed them.
LikeLike
For identity investment, see Mark at Post-Masculine.
what you mean is that Krauser is one of the few INTROVERT Gamers out there.
You are also an introvert. I’ve seen your pic – you have recessed periorbital sockets and “haunted” gaze, same as Nic and everyone in the above video. This is the classic Neanderthal face, and comes with an introvert psychology.
Since 80% are extrovert cro magnon, most Game advice will be geared for extroverts and of limited utility to introverts.
Mark is another introvert, with the same facial bone structure. Vox Day is another – same eyes, same gaze.
Here are a bunch of famous scientists and thinkers displaying the same gaze. And here is a skull reconstruction of a Neanderthal showing the same gaze.
Note that the modern brow and lower face seen in the scientist pic are features of the late Amud Neanderthal from 38k years ago, whereas the skull reconstruction pic shows an earlier variant.
LikeLike
You can see the difference between Amud and early Neanderthal in these two pics of fighters:
Nikolai Valuev – a living fossil
Goran Reljic – perfect Amud
Both have the characteristic deep eye sockets, but completely different brow and lower face.
LikeLike
It would be of interest to see a daygamer’s modifications to night/club game and vice versa. I forget which “early pioneer” noted the differences.
And there ain’t NO way I’m going back to forums to wade thru the teething rings to find out…
LikeLike
Heartiste has talked about the differences. So does Nick Krauser.
LikeLike
*ahem*
And there ain’t NO way I’m going back to forums to wade thru the teething rings to find out…
LikeLike
Golf clap to krauser, I watched the whole thing and he made a solid case, praising Rollo Tomasi and CH. And it takes courage to go to the battlefront knowing that the feminist mafia and its loser sycophants will pull out their shaming rusty artillery.
Was he preparing the field for our dark master? Cause I look forward to my nerdgasm when I’ll watch R/H himsseff making a mainstream interview.
LikeLike
I’m still holding out for the GBFM tell-all interview.
LikeLike
i wonder how that would go…
LikeLike
If Krauser is so good, why is he in Thailand? Give me a break.
[heartiste: you sound desperate. is the truth of women’s attraction mechanisms beginning to rock you to your core? rhetorical.]
LikeLike
I can’t give him quite accurate advise since I am not that type of matiny idol looks myself. and it struck me late since it makes sense that an already swell seeming guy acting all narcissistic wouldn’t look as good as it looks on a non good looking guy especially a basset hound face who acts as like nothing matters and he is still the most good looking guy of all. i taught on the second that it may actually bacfire for a good looking guy.
and note that this question relates not only to pickup but in maleness attitude in general and in LTRs as well.
I woul rephrase his question here now as:
“should a good looking guy “generally” act less asshole and narcissistic than his non-good looking peers?”.
sincerely,
Wizard Corpse.
LikeLike
Hold up this dude a guru and only had 50 because of game.
LikeLike
not even close to breaching the alpha wall of that one post wherever it is.
LikeLike
good point, but that post emphasized quality to breach the alpha wall, it sounded like the quality of his 50 was superb…
LikeLike
HOLLY SHIT !!! wrong post , my bad
LikeLike
i’ve had 50 in the last 3 months but you could prob divide by two add three months and have 50 maybe
LikeLike
There are no “quality” woman get it out of your head
LikeLike
“quality” as in good looks, 50 4’s ain’t as alpha as 50 7’s
LikeLike
say hot chicks then
people say “quality” they usually mean some fanciful ho
LikeLike
agreed.
LikeLike
50 4’s isn’t any kind of alpha at all.
LikeLike
Very smart guy. His accent threw me — or rather scared me — when I started listening, but his insights were so good I just wanted to hear more. Most of us have probably heard the kernel of his ideas before, but he takes it a step further. The economic reason for societally mandated monogamy was brand new to me.
LikeLike
It was Mystery who said “use a fake accent as a NEG” – ’cause girls are known to hate accents.
LikeLike
His accent is just a standard northeast of England accent. Nothing fake about it.
LikeLike
You
are a sharp one
LikeLike
I would have guessed it was scouse which is really only from the Mersey area since the other people in Lancashire don’t speak tihs way.It’s a seaport so there’s an odd mixture there. This accent also changed because back in the 60’s it was more influenced by Irish and Welsh and sounded more like the way the Beatles and the other groups from that area would speak although even here they probably told by theirmanagers to speak a more standard English because people in the UK and the US would have a hard time understanding this odd accent. What gave this guy away is when he said boooook for book and as far as I know they only do this in scouse.
LikeLike
“Filling in a ticket in her little white boook” (Lovely Rita, Sgt Pepper – Beatles)
LikeLike
he’s definately from the northeast, sounds like a Hull accent to me, maybe further north.
LikeLike
This is true
LikeLike
Not that I’m a stalker but I’m pretty sure he is from Newcastle.
LikeLike
Yup
LikeLike
Test post. Pls. disregard.
LikeLike
or the way a bitch will describe herself as “quality” even though she just has three holes like every other ho
LikeLike
well i guess more like 9 holes lol
LikeLike
Three holes you can use LOL.
LikeLike
i put the tip in the eyes ear nose and belly button just for pure ownage
LikeLike
fuck i’m never bored but i am bored grr
LikeLike
So am I. Where do you live that you post at this time of day?
LikeLike
i live in hell soon to be leaving hopefully
LikeLike
how bout you
LikeLike
its not that bad i guess on east coast playing video games and fucking ho’s the lifestyle i always wanted to try.
LikeLike
Sydney. I have spent a bit of time in the US. But back in Oz now.
Dove
LikeLike
yea will be moving to your side of the world hopefully soon
LikeLike
figure spice it up a bit and hunt and kill a komodo dragon just to say i did it he he he
LikeLike
The Indonesians would not like you killing one of their beautiful big lizards.
LikeLike
they won’t mind as long as i promise to mount it next to the other one i have on my wall.
LikeLike
That’s funny. I sent that and I thought it never arrived. Anyway leave the poor things be!
Dove
LikeLike
At about 24:16 or so, I wish every guy would start learning Game right there.
LikeLike
that wasn’t very entertaining at all where is the exceptiontotherule when ya need her
LikeLike
The more I hear the words of the prophets, the more I see that feminism is just one, giant, extremely destructive shit test.
The feminists and wyminists and warpigs are asking if we’re “man enough,” and of course, we are, but they’re getting fat, angry, and increasingly useless from anything other than spwanibg
LikeLike
http://www.nhpco.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3285
dam someones been listening to my suicide crap
this blog does make a difference maybe he he he
LikeLike
Lately, Krauser branched out into a blog focusing more on inner game. Well written and insightful: http://countcervantes.wordpress.com/
LikeLike
The Guru on
…The Guru
I always love
that kind of deep originality.
LikeLike
I have seen Krauser in action in the US. Same style run up approach as in his videos. It works just as well here with American girls, insta date, etc. However, it looks so “easy” in his videos because he has a) practiced doing this hundreds if not thousands of times, b) he has invested in himself. Most people who try to do this will fail initially and therefore claim it doesn’t work. But seeing is believing…he can create something from nothing in terms of female attraction.
LikeLike
This is awesome!
I loved the part about Feminism is the attempt of old hags to extract male resources out of men that would otherwise go to young hot women; and said old hags jealously conspire to brow beat men to give them the things they can’t otherwise get.
awesome,
LikeLike
Key insight from Krauser:
Men evolved to deal with reality — hunting and killing food, fending off predators and other tribes, building shelter. Men who were poor at reality (i.e. logic) did not survive to reproduce. That’s why logic reigns supreme for men.
Women evolved to get what they want through men — shelter, protection, food etc. They deal with reality only secondarily through men. Emotions and emotional intelligence to get goodies from men are key survival reproductive traits for women. That’s why emotion reigns supreme for women.
Brilliant.
Bolsters the argument that women’s suffrage was a terrible idea.
LikeLike
I think there’s a lot of truth to that. It would also explain why women are more socially intelligent. It is to their benefit to know who is connected to who and who recieves resources from who. They are better coordinators and event planners.
LikeLike
I agree with all that. Women fight over men’s resources.
LikeLike
Flat out pseudo science in my opinion. All signs point to a more equitable division of labor before agriculture, when women started exploiting men. In most societies women actually did more of the home building. I don’t know how anyone gets away with saying shit like this when it flies in the face of basic fact.
LikeLike
Gator, thanks for disturbing the echo chamber here. Women clearly do a lot of work in hunter-gatherer societies. Most evidence points to virtually equivalent IQs among men and women. But weren’t women still doing relatively less productive work, and instead focusing more on reproductive work? In other words this commenter is exaggerating, but has a point. Females certainly have evolved so as to manipulate males for resources, whereas men are far more likely to manipulate for sex.
LikeLike
More men geniuses of course.
Dove
LikeLike
Lots more. The white female IQ distribution has a significantly narrower standard deviation than that of men. Mentioning this got Larry Summers fired from being President of Harvard, but it’s a well established psychometric fact, hated and suppressed by feminists and their leftist allies. (It hasn’t been well studied for other races. It’s actually the American sample in most cases, but e.g. blacks and Asians have been swamped in that by whites historically.)
That results in about 4x as many men as women having IQ’s above 145. The difference at 160 and above is even greater. At some point virtually no women are above but a good small lot of men are.
At 160 and above people tend to be pretty socially awkward though. For one thing they have a hard time communicating well with, or being interested in, or being interesting to, those who are 20-30 IQ points below them, which is the great majority of people, even in elitish circles. This starts to kick in a good bit above 145.
Of course their are socially awkward nerds and geeks at much lower levels of intelligence, and even among those not so smart at all, but that I think has more to do with unrelated social deficits in other areas such as being way below average in looks, very introverted, unimaginative, and so on.
LikeLike
Spend some time with women and you’ll know its truth.
LikeLike
“All signs point to a more equitable division of labor before agriculture,”
Equitable as in did things of equal worth? Or the same? Most of the no/equitable division of labor nonsense that I have heard has been influenced by feminist thought of “the good days before evil men formed the patriarchy” or ‘female breadwinners before man got the plow”
Though that would mean that the sexes would have to be interchanged in:
“when women started exploiting men.”
unless you meant to say that women did more work before agriculture came into picture, while that may be true, it doesn’t necessarily mean that women were doing equal work before, or that they didn’t have access to better resources through men.
“I don’t know how anyone gets away with saying shit like this when it flies in the face of basic fact.”
Check the premises of your ‘basic fact’. ‘It flies in the face of history that I have learned’.
PS – googled and found that you believe in the matriarchal structure of hunter-gatherer societies, I am gonna stop now.
PPS – Apologies for using ‘his-tory’.
LikeLike
that interview was super interesting…checking out some of his other material ATM.
LikeLike
Maybe these so called former betas were alphas all along and just needed a little nudge. I just don’t believe that any man can just simply learn to be alpha. That this life could’ve been possible for me, if only there was an internet when i wasa young man. I am now 42 and miserable, and too set in my ways to believe things can be good. So, as much as i want to believe, it is impossible for me to do so. The looks factor is hard to let go of.
LikeLike
I think almost any man can be alpha. It is just this stupid unnatural society we have. I hope it changes soon.
Dove
LikeLike
yea late you over the hill hope you believe in reincarnation better luck next time
LikeLike
@dungslinger; you’re short aint ya?
LikeLike
69 is my lucky number. Had to break it..
LikeLike
what did you expect someone to tell you it was all gonna be ok?
It won’t be with your attitude i wished you better luck in the next life what more do you want lol
LikeLike
Only 50 women?
For someone considered to be a Grand Master, that is a surprisingly low number…
How can the average student of Game ever expect to get decent results, if even Krauser got just 50?
LikeLike
50 pubic scalps!
LikeLike
A human shish kabob.
LikeLike
Krauser is an introvert, and a fairly ingenopathic rather than psychopathic one.
Ingenopathic introvert gamers will tend towards lower notch counts, longer relationships, and higher quality and/or screening match.
Psychopathic and/or extrovert gamers will tend towards higher notch counts, shorter relationships, and lower quality and/or screening match.
Ceteris paribus, of course.
LikeLike
can you send me a mail or leave a comment on my blog so I can ask you something about this? Couldn’t get into your blog with it being private now.
LikeLike
Reply sent, not sure why blog was showing private to you
LikeLike
I had an old URL in my comment form here, whoops. Blog’s public, fixed in this one.
LikeLike
That’s 50 women in 3 years, and a considerable number of them were very hot indeed. The average age he says is around 22. And he started from pretty much ZERO.
Here is a man who uses his real name, appears undisguised in public, hides nothing, and makes no miraculous claims. I’m inclined to believe he’s telling the truth.
LikeLike
Yes, I would love to hear him brag.
Men bragging about their conquests gets me moist. Even here.
Dove
LikeLike
I’m no Grandmaster and never claimed as such. I’m just fairly good with women and do better than I would without Game.
[heartiste: anti-game haters would evaporate into the ether if they were left without their precious strawmen from which to construct their “arguments”. to them, game fails if you don’t bed a succession of HB10s. they have no concept of graduated improvement. or they do, but for the purposes of their hate, they don’t care about arguing in good faith.]
LikeLike
Well said krauserpua. Your objectivity is totally convincing, realistic, and inspiring to those who live in the real world yet can imagine, hard-headedly, that they might improve their circumstances through well-informed effort.
That said, I wonder if you would care to comment on this: In the first, informally-published (that is, freely circulated on the Internet) edition of The Mystery Method, Mystery himself introduced the work with these words:
“The purpose of this manual is to teach you how to attract beautiful women. You will learn strategies for dealing with your emotional states…THIS FIELD GUIDE IS DESIGNED FOR THE SOLDIER OF LOVE WHO CAN ALREADY GET GIRLS. IF YOU CANNOT ALREADY GET GIRLS THIS MANUAL IS NOT FOR YOU.” [my emphasis].
The second, commercial edition did not include these words. I have the strong impression that Mystery, until he decided to derive his income from marketing Game, was addressing naturals, not betas. Any thoughts?
LikeLike