• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Chicks Dig Jerks In Every Way: The Science
Fast-Tracking Familiarity »

Interview With Daygamer Nick Krauser

May 21, 2012 by CH

Regular readers who follow my (admittedly, attenuated) take on the PUA scene know that I consider Krauser to be one of the few bona fide pickup artists out there. It’s why I have his blog linked on the right under “Game”.

Krauser adheres to an “indirect-direct” daytime approach style that suits my personality well, so I’m perhaps a bit partial in my praise. Daygamers who use different approach techniques shouldn’t feel put off; remember, the core concepts behind most of the game styles are essentially the same, with the exceptions being the distinctions inherent in day vs night game, club vs everywhere else game, and native vs foreign game. Even those exceptions, as stark as their differences may seem to newbies, share a lot of critical game principles. Female hypergamy — the cosmic force that underpins much of the game technology geared to leveraging it in a man’s favor — is a universal phenomenon, after all. So if I praise one PUA school of thought you can consider it tangential praise of other PUA schools of thought.

This is not to say there don’t exist shysters out there whose sole intent is to make a buck off the woes of desperate losers in love. But Krauser (and a few others) strike me as the real deal, so I don’t have a problem promoting them. In that vein, here’s a trailer to an interview of Krauser by a group called London Real.

The full one-hour interview is here.

Also, as I’ve said before whenever I feature a PUA or a game instructor, if any reader has real life experience learning from or hanging out with these guys, whether those experiences are good or bad, feel free to discuss it in the comments, or email me for a possible future post. Don’t bother trolling. I have expert-level skills at sniffing out trolls and petty haters.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Game, Videos | 87 Comments

87 Responses

  1. on May 21, 2012 at 4:56 pm maurice

    I’ve seen some of his online videos- they seem real (that is, not staged) but I suspect that sort of on-the-street method might freak out or put off some women- compared to other day-game venues like coffee shops, bookstores, etc.

    LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 11:17 am MakeshiftAlpha

      Krauser is totally real, I been out with him and he has some crazy skills. Also he doesn’t post them up but he has a fair number of his lays on film. Mans a monster.

      LikeLike


  2. on May 21, 2012 at 5:36 pm (R)Evoluzione

    The full video was pretty good. Watched it this AM before my workout. It’s cool that he gives Mark Manson’s book a shout-out, says it’s good. I haven’t read it for lack of any solid reviews. Maybe I’ll pick it up. Krauser also frequently mentions this blog & Rollo too.

    The beta in the American dude, Brian, is quite strong. It’s clear he’s uncomfortable with many topics of conversation in the interview, and at a few points he makes some feeble white-knight noise about some of Krauser’s generalizations.

    Good shit overall, and it shows that game science is becoming mainstream. The London Real’s FB page got some sad-feminist comments after the interview.

    LikeLike


  3. on May 21, 2012 at 5:39 pm Anonymous

    His greatest revelation was “it’s about being more invested in yourself than in her and others”. That’s where the rubber meets the road.

    LikeLike


  4. on May 21, 2012 at 6:14 pm rek

    “You don’t get young, beautiful feminists, they don’t exist.”

    Man, that’s a big 10-4.

    LikeLike


    • on May 21, 2012 at 6:37 pm geo

      I don’t know about now, but there were more young and beautiful (on the outside) feminist in the 90s than you could shake a stick at. And it required little or no game to bed them.

      LikeLike


  5. on May 21, 2012 at 6:46 pm Koanic

    For identity investment, see Mark at Post-Masculine.
    what you mean is that Krauser is one of the few INTROVERT Gamers out there.

    You are also an introvert. I’ve seen your pic – you have recessed periorbital sockets and “haunted” gaze, same as Nic and everyone in the above video. This is the classic Neanderthal face, and comes with an introvert psychology.

    Since 80% are extrovert cro magnon, most Game advice will be geared for extroverts and of limited utility to introverts.

    Mark is another introvert, with the same facial bone structure. Vox Day is another – same eyes, same gaze.

    Here are a bunch of famous scientists and thinkers displaying the same gaze. And here is a skull reconstruction of a Neanderthal showing the same gaze.

    Note that the modern brow and lower face seen in the scientist pic are features of the late Amud Neanderthal from 38k years ago, whereas the skull reconstruction pic shows an earlier variant.

    LikeLike


  6. on May 21, 2012 at 7:00 pm Koanic

    You can see the difference between Amud and early Neanderthal in these two pics of fighters:

    Nikolai Valuev – a living fossil

    Goran Reljic – perfect Amud

    Both have the characteristic deep eye sockets, but completely different brow and lower face.

    LikeLike


  7. on May 21, 2012 at 7:14 pm Firepower

    It would be of interest to see a daygamer’s modifications to night/club game and vice versa. I forget which “early pioneer” noted the differences.

    And there ain’t NO way I’m going back to forums to wade thru the teething rings to find out…

    LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 4:17 pm doug1111

      Heartiste has talked about the differences. So does Nick Krauser.

      LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 5:03 pm Firepower

        *ahem*

        And there ain’t NO way I’m going back to forums to wade thru the teething rings to find out…

        LikeLike


  8. on May 21, 2012 at 8:38 pm Anon

    Golf clap to krauser, I watched the whole thing and he made a solid case, praising Rollo Tomasi and CH. And it takes courage to go to the battlefront knowing that the feminist mafia and its loser sycophants will pull out their shaming rusty artillery.

    Was he preparing the field for our dark master? Cause I look forward to my nerdgasm when I’ll watch R/H himsseff making a mainstream interview.

    LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 2:06 pm Dan Fletcher

      I’m still holding out for the GBFM tell-all interview.

      LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 2:48 pm itsme

        i wonder how that would go…

        LikeLike


  9. on May 21, 2012 at 10:04 pm Anonymous trollthing

    If Krauser is so good, why is he in Thailand? Give me a break.

    [heartiste: you sound desperate. is the truth of women’s attraction mechanisms beginning to rock you to your core? rhetorical.]

    LikeLike


  10. on May 21, 2012 at 11:02 pm wizardcorpse

    I can’t give him quite accurate advise since I am not that type of matiny idol looks myself. and it struck me late since it makes sense that an already swell seeming guy acting all narcissistic wouldn’t look as good as it looks on a non good looking guy especially a basset hound face who acts as like nothing matters and he is still the most good looking guy of all. i taught on the second that it may actually bacfire for a good looking guy.
    and note that this question relates not only to pickup but in maleness attitude in general and in LTRs as well.
    I woul rephrase his question here now as:
    “should a good looking guy “generally” act less asshole and narcissistic than his non-good looking peers?”.
    sincerely,
    Wizard Corpse.

    LikeLike


  11. on May 21, 2012 at 11:51 pm gunslingergregi

    Hold up this dude a guru and only had 50 because of game.

    LikeLike


  12. on May 21, 2012 at 11:55 pm gunslingergregi

    not even close to breaching the alpha wall of that one post wherever it is.

    LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 2:44 am proxy

      good point, but that post emphasized quality to breach the alpha wall, it sounded like the quality of his 50 was superb…

      LikeLike


  13. on May 22, 2012 at 12:28 am wizardcorpse

    HOLLY SHIT !!! wrong post , my bad

    LikeLike


  14. on May 22, 2012 at 2:33 am gunslingergregi

    i’ve had 50 in the last 3 months but you could prob divide by two add three months and have 50 maybe

    LikeLike


  15. on May 22, 2012 at 3:19 am gunslingergregi

    There are no “quality” woman get it out of your head

    LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 4:09 am proxy

      “quality” as in good looks, 50 4’s ain’t as alpha as 50 7’s

      LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 4:46 am gunslingergregi

        say hot chicks then
        people say “quality” they usually mean some fanciful ho

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 3:14 am proxy

        agreed.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 4:20 pm doug1111

        50 4’s isn’t any kind of alpha at all.

        LikeLike


  16. on May 22, 2012 at 3:31 am lightlybraisedturnip

    Very smart guy. His accent threw me — or rather scared me — when I started listening, but his insights were so good I just wanted to hear more. Most of us have probably heard the kernel of his ideas before, but he takes it a step further. The economic reason for societally mandated monogamy was brand new to me.

    LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 8:31 am Firepower

      lightlybraisedturnip

      Most of us have probably heard the kernel of his ideas before

      It was Mystery who said “use a fake accent as a NEG” – ’cause girls are known to hate accents.

      LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 3:21 pm Anonymous

        His accent is just a standard northeast of England accent. Nothing fake about it.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 3:54 pm Firepower

        You
        are a sharp one

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 4:15 pm The Whammer

        I would have guessed it was scouse which is really only from the Mersey area since the other people in Lancashire don’t speak tihs way.It’s a seaport so there’s an odd mixture there. This accent also changed because back in the 60’s it was more influenced by Irish and Welsh and sounded more like the way the Beatles and the other groups from that area would speak although even here they probably told by theirmanagers to speak a more standard English because people in the UK and the US would have a hard time understanding this odd accent. What gave this guy away is when he said boooook for book and as far as I know they only do this in scouse.

        LikeLike


      • on May 22, 2012 at 8:44 pm Anonymous

        “Filling in a ticket in her little white boook” (Lovely Rita, Sgt Pepper – Beatles)

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 7:45 am no magic pills

        he’s definately from the northeast, sounds like a Hull accent to me, maybe further north.

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 8:58 pm krauserpua

        This is true

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 6:45 pm sharp

        Not that I’m a stalker but I’m pretty sure he is from Newcastle.

        LikeLike


      • on May 26, 2012 at 11:42 am krauserpua

        Yup

        LikeLike


  17. on May 22, 2012 at 3:38 am lightlybraisedturnip

    Test post. Pls. disregard.

    LikeLike


  18. on May 22, 2012 at 4:48 am gunslingergregi

    or the way a bitch will describe herself as “quality” even though she just has three holes like every other ho

    LikeLike


  19. on May 22, 2012 at 4:49 am gunslingergregi

    well i guess more like 9 holes lol

    LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 4:59 am CooingDove

      Three holes you can use LOL.

      LikeLike


  20. on May 22, 2012 at 5:19 am gunslingergregi

    i put the tip in the eyes ear nose and belly button just for pure ownage

    LikeLike


  21. on May 22, 2012 at 5:22 am gunslingergregi

    fuck i’m never bored but i am bored grr

    LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 5:25 am CooingDove

      So am I. Where do you live that you post at this time of day?

      LikeLike


  22. on May 22, 2012 at 5:28 am gunslingergregi

    i live in hell soon to be leaving hopefully

    LikeLike


  23. on May 22, 2012 at 5:29 am gunslingergregi

    how bout you

    LikeLike


  24. on May 22, 2012 at 5:34 am gunslingergregi

    its not that bad i guess on east coast playing video games and fucking ho’s the lifestyle i always wanted to try.

    LikeLike


  25. on May 22, 2012 at 5:37 am CooingDove

    Sydney. I have spent a bit of time in the US. But back in Oz now.

    Dove

    LikeLike


  26. on May 22, 2012 at 5:48 am gunslingergregi

    yea will be moving to your side of the world hopefully soon

    LikeLike


  27. on May 22, 2012 at 5:57 am gunslingergregi

    figure spice it up a bit and hunt and kill a komodo dragon just to say i did it he he he

    LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 6:00 am CooingDove

      The Indonesians would not like you killing one of their beautiful big lizards.

      LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 8:22 am gunslingergregi

        they won’t mind as long as i promise to mount it next to the other one i have on my wall.

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 8:26 am CooingDove

        That’s funny. I sent that and I thought it never arrived. Anyway leave the poor things be!

        Dove

        LikeLike


  28. on May 22, 2012 at 6:12 am Michael of Charlotte

    At about 24:16 or so, I wish every guy would start learning Game right there.

    LikeLike


  29. on May 22, 2012 at 7:08 am gunslingergregi

    that wasn’t very entertaining at all where is the exceptiontotherule when ya need her

    LikeLike


  30. on May 22, 2012 at 7:49 am drunicusrex

    The more I hear the words of the prophets, the more I see that feminism is just one, giant, extremely destructive shit test.
    The feminists and wyminists and warpigs are asking if we’re “man enough,” and of course, we are, but they’re getting fat, angry, and increasingly useless from anything other than spwanibg

    LikeLike


  31. on May 22, 2012 at 9:15 am gunslingergregi

    http://www.nhpco.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3285

    dam someones been listening to my suicide crap
    this blog does make a difference maybe he he he

    LikeLike


  32. on May 22, 2012 at 9:29 am Dr Caveman

    Lately, Krauser branched out into a blog focusing more on inner game. Well written and insightful: http://countcervantes.wordpress.com/

    LikeLike


    • on May 22, 2012 at 10:41 am Firepower

      The Guru on
      …The Guru
      I always love
      that kind of deep originality.

      LikeLike


  33. on May 22, 2012 at 10:00 am ASF

    I have seen Krauser in action in the US. Same style run up approach as in his videos. It works just as well here with American girls, insta date, etc. However, it looks so “easy” in his videos because he has a) practiced doing this hundreds if not thousands of times, b) he has invested in himself. Most people who try to do this will fail initially and therefore claim it doesn’t work. But seeing is believing…he can create something from nothing in terms of female attraction.

    LikeLike


  34. on May 23, 2012 at 2:46 am migsflecha

    This is awesome!
    I loved the part about Feminism is the attempt of old hags to extract male resources out of men that would otherwise go to young hot women; and said old hags jealously conspire to brow beat men to give them the things they can’t otherwise get.
    awesome,

    LikeLike


  35. on May 23, 2012 at 3:21 am moses

    Key insight from Krauser:

    Men evolved to deal with reality — hunting and killing food, fending off predators and other tribes, building shelter. Men who were poor at reality (i.e. logic) did not survive to reproduce. That’s why logic reigns supreme for men.

    Women evolved to get what they want through men — shelter, protection, food etc. They deal with reality only secondarily through men. Emotions and emotional intelligence to get goodies from men are key survival reproductive traits for women. That’s why emotion reigns supreme for women.

    Brilliant.

    Bolsters the argument that women’s suffrage was a terrible idea.

    LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 2:12 pm Sidewinder

      I think there’s a lot of truth to that. It would also explain why women are more socially intelligent. It is to their benefit to know who is connected to who and who recieves resources from who. They are better coordinators and event planners.

      LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 2:25 pm CooingDove

      I agree with all that. Women fight over men’s resources.

      LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 3:29 pm Gator

      Flat out pseudo science in my opinion. All signs point to a more equitable division of labor before agriculture, when women started exploiting men. In most societies women actually did more of the home building. I don’t know how anyone gets away with saying shit like this when it flies in the face of basic fact.

      LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 6:07 pm PS

        Gator, thanks for disturbing the echo chamber here. Women clearly do a lot of work in hunter-gatherer societies. Most evidence points to virtually equivalent IQs among men and women. But weren’t women still doing relatively less productive work, and instead focusing more on reproductive work? In other words this commenter is exaggerating, but has a point. Females certainly have evolved so as to manipulate males for resources, whereas men are far more likely to manipulate for sex.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 4:34 am CooingDove

        More men geniuses of course.

        Dove

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 6:12 pm doug1111

        Lots more. The white female IQ distribution has a significantly narrower standard deviation than that of men. Mentioning this got Larry Summers fired from being President of Harvard, but it’s a well established psychometric fact, hated and suppressed by feminists and their leftist allies. (It hasn’t been well studied for other races. It’s actually the American sample in most cases, but e.g. blacks and Asians have been swamped in that by whites historically.)

        That results in about 4x as many men as women having IQ’s above 145. The difference at 160 and above is even greater. At some point virtually no women are above but a good small lot of men are.

        At 160 and above people tend to be pretty socially awkward though. For one thing they have a hard time communicating well with, or being interested in, or being interesting to, those who are 20-30 IQ points below them, which is the great majority of people, even in elitish circles. This starts to kick in a good bit above 145.

        Of course their are socially awkward nerds and geeks at much lower levels of intelligence, and even among those not so smart at all, but that I think has more to do with unrelated social deficits in other areas such as being way below average in looks, very introverted, unimaginative, and so on.

        LikeLike


      • on May 23, 2012 at 8:01 pm Ben

        Spend some time with women and you’ll know its truth.

        LikeLike


      • on May 24, 2012 at 1:49 pm namae nanka

        “All signs point to a more equitable division of labor before agriculture,”

        Equitable as in did things of equal worth? Or the same? Most of the no/equitable division of labor nonsense that I have heard has been influenced by feminist thought of “the good days before evil men formed the patriarchy” or ‘female breadwinners before man got the plow”
        Though that would mean that the sexes would have to be interchanged in:
        “when women started exploiting men.”

        unless you meant to say that women did more work before agriculture came into picture, while that may be true, it doesn’t necessarily mean that women were doing equal work before, or that they didn’t have access to better resources through men.

        “I don’t know how anyone gets away with saying shit like this when it flies in the face of basic fact.”

        Check the premises of your ‘basic fact’. ‘It flies in the face of history that I have learned’.

        PS – googled and found that you believe in the matriarchal structure of hunter-gatherer societies, I am gonna stop now.

        PPS – Apologies for using ‘his-tory’.

        LikeLike


  36. on May 23, 2012 at 7:00 am jgb99

    that interview was super interesting…checking out some of his other material ATM.

    LikeLike


  37. on May 23, 2012 at 8:16 am tragically late

    Maybe these so called former betas were alphas all along and just needed a little nudge. I just don’t believe that any man can just simply learn to be alpha. That this life could’ve been possible for me, if only there was an internet when i wasa young man. I am now 42 and miserable, and too set in my ways to believe things can be good. So, as much as i want to believe, it is impossible for me to do so. The looks factor is hard to let go of.

    LikeLike


    • on May 23, 2012 at 8:29 am CooingDove

      I think almost any man can be alpha. It is just this stupid unnatural society we have. I hope it changes soon.

      Dove

      LikeLike


  38. on May 23, 2012 at 8:21 am gunslingergregi

    yea late you over the hill hope you believe in reincarnation better luck next time

    LikeLike


  39. on May 23, 2012 at 3:09 pm tragically late

    @dungslinger; you’re short aint ya?

    LikeLike


  40. on May 23, 2012 at 11:57 pm necorochi

    69 is my lucky number. Had to break it..

    LikeLike


  41. on May 24, 2012 at 10:21 am gunslingergregi

    what did you expect someone to tell you it was all gonna be ok?
    It won’t be with your attitude i wished you better luck in the next life what more do you want lol

    LikeLike


  42. on May 26, 2012 at 12:06 am Anon2

    Only 50 women?

    For someone considered to be a Grand Master, that is a surprisingly low number…

    How can the average student of Game ever expect to get decent results, if even Krauser got just 50?

    LikeLike


    • on May 26, 2012 at 12:18 am CooingDove

      50 pubic scalps!

      LikeLike


      • on May 26, 2012 at 4:20 am CooingDove

        A human shish kabob.

        LikeLike


    • on May 26, 2012 at 12:25 am Koanic

      Krauser is an introvert, and a fairly ingenopathic rather than psychopathic one.

      Ingenopathic introvert gamers will tend towards lower notch counts, longer relationships, and higher quality and/or screening match.

      Psychopathic and/or extrovert gamers will tend towards higher notch counts, shorter relationships, and lower quality and/or screening match.

      Ceteris paribus, of course.

      LikeLike


      • on June 10, 2012 at 4:42 am countcervantes

        can you send me a mail or leave a comment on my blog so I can ask you something about this? Couldn’t get into your blog with it being private now.

        LikeLike


      • on June 10, 2012 at 5:48 am Koanic

        Reply sent, not sure why blog was showing private to you

        LikeLike


      • on June 10, 2012 at 5:49 am Koanic

        I had an old URL in my comment form here, whoops. Blog’s public, fixed in this one.

        LikeLike


    • on May 26, 2012 at 4:22 am Strainge the Strainger

      That’s 50 women in 3 years, and a considerable number of them were very hot indeed. The average age he says is around 22. And he started from pretty much ZERO.

      Here is a man who uses his real name, appears undisguised in public, hides nothing, and makes no miraculous claims. I’m inclined to believe he’s telling the truth.

      LikeLike


      • on May 26, 2012 at 4:30 am CooingDove

        Yes, I would love to hear him brag.

        Men bragging about their conquests gets me moist. Even here.

        Dove

        LikeLike


  43. on May 26, 2012 at 11:39 am krauserpua

    I’m no Grandmaster and never claimed as such. I’m just fairly good with women and do better than I would without Game.

    [heartiste: anti-game haters would evaporate into the ether if they were left without their precious strawmen from which to construct their “arguments”. to them, game fails if you don’t bed a succession of HB10s. they have no concept of graduated improvement. or they do, but for the purposes of their hate, they don’t care about arguing in good faith.]

    LikeLike


    • on May 26, 2012 at 1:02 pm Strainge the Strainger

      Well said krauserpua. Your objectivity is totally convincing, realistic, and inspiring to those who live in the real world yet can imagine, hard-headedly, that they might improve their circumstances through well-informed effort.

      That said, I wonder if you would care to comment on this: In the first, informally-published (that is, freely circulated on the Internet) edition of The Mystery Method, Mystery himself introduced the work with these words:

      “The purpose of this manual is to teach you how to attract beautiful women. You will learn strategies for dealing with your emotional states…THIS FIELD GUIDE IS DESIGNED FOR THE SOLDIER OF LOVE WHO CAN ALREADY GET GIRLS. IF YOU CANNOT ALREADY GET GIRLS THIS MANUAL IS NOT FOR YOU.” [my emphasis].

      The second, commercial edition did not include these words. I have the strong impression that Mystery, until he decided to derive his income from marketing Game, was addressing naturals, not betas. Any thoughts?

      LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    HoneyBear on The Confound Of Silence
    Popcorn Out on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    HoneyBear on The Confound Of Silence
    Captain John Charity… on “Conspiracy Theory…
    Captain John Charity… on “Conspiracy Theory…
    Captain John Charity… on “Conspiracy Theory…
    Captain John Charity… on “Conspiracy Theory…
    Harold on The Confound Of Silence
    oink on The Confound Of Silence
    Morphine1 on The Confound Of Silence
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hivemind Is Real
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Manifest Depravity
    • The Diminishing Returns Of Anti-White Virtue Signaling
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Revolutionary Spirals To Civil War 2
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: