Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The Problem With Single Women Having The Vote

When you don’t have an alpha male in your personal life to admire and rely on for support (partly because you make your own money and don’t feel a pressing need to have a middle class compliment&cuddle herb around for security), you turn to the next facsimile — the substitute alpha male who promises limitless resources for you and your future sprogling. This substitute alpha male is The State, and its shaman emissary is Obama.

Don’t believe me? Check the polls.

If President Barack Obama wins a second term, he may have to thank all the single ladies: A new poll out Wednesday shows Obama crushing Mitt Romney among unmarried women by a lopsided 60%-31% margin. […]

The Quinnipiac survey found Romney up 54%-35% among married men and 49%-42% among married women. Obama led 47%-38% among single men and  60%-31% among single women.

Single women are bankrupting this country. And they don’t give a shit, as long as they get theirs, which includes tingles.

Marriage does seem to be at least a partial cure, but with overall marriage rates falling, and age of first marriage delayed, it’s likely the Gimmedat Party will soon demographically overwhelm national elections and put the “opposition” into permanent minority status. Couple this trend with the Mexodus where 2/3rds of all Amerindian migrants — and that’s a lot of them now — will vote for Gimmedats no matter what, and you are looking at a recipe for stark, self-interested regionalism and possible secession, coming soon to a deteriorating bread and circus pledge drive near you.

But, cheers, at least you got the latest comparatively advantaged, slave-labor iPhone and some cheap chalupas!

Related, Whiskey left a pretty good comment over at Sailer’s:

I wish immigration WAS a deciding factor for how Whites vote, but it just isn’t. White women don’t get harmed by it, there’s all those immigrant kids to teach, NGO-mind, and status monger over. Who taught me that?

STEVE SAILER.

The marginal vote gained by emphasizing immigration loses two (female) votes; Romney is a numbers guy, its why he emphasized it but not much on the GOP trail, and not at all tonight.

Does anyone think the undecided are going to vote for a guy who wants to deport illegals? Really? When those voters are overwhelmingly White and female? And single?

As Steve pointed out, the declining White share of the vote makes bigger White proportions mandatory for winning. If Romney wants to win, he has to get more than McCain’s 60% of the White vote. That means WOMEN. Since Obama took White single women by over 70%, and has an edge over abortion, contraception, paying for it, female preferences, culture wars, and the like. Romney can’t win them but he can cut say that percentage down by 10%.

And in office he can without fanfare on the margins increase deportations, fines for employing illegals (hit Chipotle hard), and the like. Marginal changes are all we have got, because Whites are smaller percentages of voters.

Do any of you know any actual women? They despise to a woman social conservatism, and anti-immigration measures like deportation as “cruel” and reactionary. Pandering to them is necessary. I’d rather have less bad than awful.

Whiskey is onto something. I swim among single women — mostly white, mostly educated and/or intelligent, in their 20s and 30s — and I can assure you they have a rock hard clit boner for Obama and leftie policies in general. Romney may as well be the anti-Christ when he’s not some buffoon at whom they happily lob insipid snark bombs. I can count on three fingers the number of unmarried girls I know who aren’t reflexively pro-O-face. And even among those women who might have some sympathies for anti-Gimmedat viewpoints, any hint that you were against eternally welcoming open borders to the third world would send them spinning into point and sputter orbit.

This is the reality we live in. It’s status whoring and self-righteous hypocritical white girl preening all the way down. The people have suckled on the Big Daddy Government teat for too long, and they ain’t giving it up. Single women are the worst teat sucklers because it is in the nature of women, before they have had their estrogenic rocket fuel burned out of them by marriage and children, to extract as many resources from the tribe’s public pot as they can manage, and to dispense as much of the public till to sympathetic groups in a showy self-annihilation of pathological altruism.

And men, the majority of them generally being weak-willed betas all too happy to dance to young babes’ tunes, have neither the balls nor the heart to call them out for their vapid politics. Many white men are so manboobed they actually yearn for their dispossession, both demographically and politically, like some cuckold fetishist lubing his palm with his salty tears and pulling forlornly at his purple pud in the corner as he gets psychologically ass-rammed by his gleeful tormentors.

As the day must yield to night, so did suffrage yield to anarcho-tyranny.

So, there is nothing really that Romney can do, that heeds the media’s constraints on his party for acceptable discourse, to win over this group. He has three choices that stand a chance:

1. Become Gimmedat Lite and hope to peel off a sliver of the single mom contingent, and then rule differently once in office (fat chance), sacrificing a second term for the greater good.

2. Maximize his gains among single white men. If he can get that group to vote for him 80-20, then the 70-30 advantage O-face has among single white women is nullified.

3. Hope that the polls are lying because people are saying what they think the pollsters want to hear.

Right now, number one is what’s happening, and even then I don’t think Romney pulls this off. Why settle for a poor imitation of the real thing?

In a future post, I will discuss how crime thinkers such as yourself can successfully navigate the sexual market of leftie SWPL chicks without scaring them off or suffering undue mental distress. Hint: Be a sly motherfucker.

Addendum:

Will white chicks flock to the alpha male, regardless of his politics? That’s a good question. The alpha allure may have met its match against the promises of the sexless, bottomless beta provider of the nanny state government. Romney out-alpha’ed Obama in the debate…

YOU GOT ALPHA’ED!

…but Obama still holds the trump card of being the guy who represents the dream of every girl to have a harem of eunuch beta male orbiters showering her with emotional support and money while demanding nothing in return. It’ll be interesting to see if the polls budge among women in favor of Romney because he looked like a boss disciplining a lackadaisical employee during the debate. Obama’s head nodding while Romney dressed him down was a huge beta tell, and women pick up on that subtle body language stuff. If they are sufficiently turned off, this election could be up for grabs.

794 Responses

  1. Women’s suffrage introduced a permanent leftward tilt in american politics. The growth in the size and scope of government is mainly due to women voting.

    See Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?

    Like


    • What we subsidize, we get more of. What we tax, we get less of. Shy of a wholesale change in American culture, we’re doomed.

      The change in culture will require Divine intervention.

      Like


      • They marched over the broad expanse of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city. Fire came from God out of heaven and burned them up.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 12:40 am Mr. Pointyface

        Well, lucky someone’s going to DO something, for gosh sake! This marching thing, and God’s fire– when is it going to happen? Is there, like, a sign up sheet?

        Like


      • As a dog returneth to his vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly.

        Sign ups won’t help in your case, for:

        “A sow that is washed goes back to her wallowing in the mud.”

        Now avaunt, impious fool.

        Like


      • If you use a rarely used word, like “avaunt”, which I quite like, does that make what you’re saying any more valid?

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 12:06 pm Mr. Kissyface

        L:Ike the exotic words Greg!! But you keep failing in the basic precepts of your religion– when you say “Signups won’t help in ” my case; you’re judging me as if you know what your God is going to do when your big Party Day comes.

        How unbelievably proud, judgmental, and nearly blasphemous that seems to me, as an outsider. As if you know how your Invisible friend would judge me.

        I’ve actually worked for years with the poor and disadvantaged, exactly what Schizophrenic Humanitarian Genius Jesus said we should do. I’ll get sent to, like, only a mildly balmy part of hell; due to irritation with the intellectually impaired like yourself.

        So try to follow what you claim to believe. Humility.

        Hoping for those you don’t like to be sent to Hell is not exactly a Chrsitian sentiment. “Faith, hope and charity, but the greatest of these is charity.”

        Like


      • Speaking of dog vomit, check out this photo of young German women enthusiastically cheering Hitler in 1935, just 17 years after women in Germany were allowed to vote.

        Or this photo of the League of German Maidens:

        http://www.annefrank.org/ImageVault/Images/id_10967/width_520/height_2445/compressionQuality_80/scope_0/ImageVaultHandler.aspx

        Female voters, born before the woman’s suffrage in German voted swept Hitler into power. The height of the Nazi’s party electoral success was due to the gender gap and newly minted women voters.

        -MV

        Like


      • If you use a rarely used word, like “avaunt”, which I quite like, does that make what you’re saying any more valid?

        It’s already valid enough… using unusual words merely gives it more style… as you so wisely noted in ‘quite liking’ it.

        Like


      • Speaking of dog vomit, check out this photo of young German women enthusiastically cheering Hitler in 1935, just 17 years after women in Germany were allowed to vote.

        Somehow, Mr. Yiddler, I found the photo of the fawning babes at the top of this post far more offensive.

        Like


      • And Kissyface/Pointyface again shows his ass… attempting to lecture a true believer about what Jesus Christ was all about, while disparaging Him in the same breath (schizophrenic) and with snark… much like the Pharisees themselves when they questioned the Lord, not to glean knowledge, but to find a wedge or trip-up to use against Him.

        Hit the road, sock-puppet.

        Like


      • “Somehow, Mr. Yiddler, I found the photo of the fawning babes at the top of this post far more offensive.”

        I’m sorry Greg, but if you can’t see the juxtaposition of these two pictures – the American women supporting Obama and the German women supporting Hitler – then you are dense. Both of them are sickening. In both cases, stupid irrational and uninformed emotionally-charged women voting for anti-Christ like charters.

        Additionally, your love affair with Hitlerianism is quite worrisome. For an intelligent man, I didn’t take you for a worshipper or a follower. Remind me, just what did Hitler do again that was so wonderful for humanity? Maybe I missed something.

        And another juxtaposition – the idiotic Jews voted for Hitler initially before they knew what he was all about, same as they are voting for Obama. History repeating itself? Possibly, but time will tell.

        And finally, for a man quoting the scriptures and speaking of The Lord, I think your worshiping Hitler is somewhat inconsistent. After all, you stand for everything he never believed in – his wicked “highness” loathed God, didn’t believe in him, he and his cohorts were murders and practically cannibals (yes cannibals), yet you’re enamored with him??? Where is your logic? Maybe a bit hypocritical? Please wise up!

        Like


      • Additionally, your love affair with Hitlerianism is quite worrisome. For an intelligent man, I didn’t take you for a worshipper or a follower. Remind me, just what did Hitler do again that was so wonderful for humanity? Maybe I missed something.

        And what “love affair” is this, pray tell? Merely stating facts about Hitler’s accomplishments during the 1930’s is not worship. It wasn’t his job to do wonderful things for “humanity”… his concern was Germany and his people, and perhaps you should start with a few post-Versailles Treaty history books if you don’t know by now the virtual miracle of German resurgence, post 1920.

        And women gushing over their own kind who, at that point, was a true hero of his folk, is a far cry from the mischlings and SWPL airheads gushing over Obama in the picture above.

        Like


      • his wicked “highness” loathed God, didn’t believe in him, he and his cohorts were murders and practically cannibals (yes cannibals), yet you’re enamored with him???

        You’ve been watching too many Schindler’s List movies.

        And you don’t have the right to your own definitions of words… look up “enamored” and try to discern the difference between that and objective reporting of historical accomplishments.

        There are others on this site who seem “enamored” of him… yet you single me out for your yiddling, though you know full well who my Lord is. Interesting.

        Like


      • on October 6, 2012 at 2:32 pm gunslingergregi

        gregs on fire nice

        Like


      • I know about him, but I’m not enamored of him in the least. Hitler was a bargain with the devil that the German people realized only too late. They would have been happiest with a return of the Kaiser, who was generally a good ruler and the state was well run and generally benevolent. Hitler filled that void for a time.

        Like


      • I singled you out because you appear God-fearing, always talking about The Lord, which I think is highly commendable in a world where people with values are considered throwbacks.

        In addition, God-fearing hardly jive with Hitler worship or longing. We can still stand for the rights of Whites, as well as men, without needing to use Hitler as an example of the good old days. If Hitler is the only example we have of social order and white power, we’re truly doomed.

        Enough with this Hitler garbage. Let’s focus on ending liberalism in all its forms. And let’s start by throwing out Obama, even if Romney isn’t all that. We got to get Obama’s radical cronies away from the white house.

        Like


      • In addition, God-fearing hardly jive with Hitler worship or longing.

        Knock off the language-loading of “worship” and “longing”.

        And for the record, your world might be a little small if you don’t see how a man can fear God and look favorably upon some of the things that went on in Germany during the 1930’s.

        Here’s a start:

        http://christconquers.wordpress.com/2011/02/07/germanys-freedom-from-international-debt-slavery/

        Like


      • Haha…..here is another juxtaposition. Hitler rose to power partly because of the Weimar Republic. Obama’s election succeeded partly because of economic collapse. The same mechanism. In times of hardship and trouble, people turn to someone who sounds good, but internally is nothing but a user of the people’s hardship for his own ambitions. A false profit and redeemer.

        In regards to the link you provided, it’s an interesting analysis of what happened, but again it doesn’t absolve Hitler. Let’s say it’s true he borrowed the money from the Jewish bankers. And today we‘re browning it from the Chinese “bankers.” Same shit different day.

        And the idea of Jewish bankers still existing is absurd. All of the banks today are nothing but multi-national corporations, like most other corporations. The fact that many Jews works in the banking industry is not proof the Jews brought economic collapse. In fact, many of the banks involved are Arab owned or influenced, or European controlled. Yet everyone lashing out at the Jews. Many CEO’s and presidents of financial institutions are not Jews. Egyptian born Mohamed Abdulla El-Erian is CEO of PIMCO, Indian born Vikram Shankar Pandit is CEO of Citi group, Jamie Dimon president and chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase is of Greek extraction, and the list goes on and on.

        BTW, these are the actual people we should fear now. They have real economic power; nothing like the Jews.

        “Most powerful Arabs in the world: in pictures”
        http://power500.arabianbusiness.com/power-500-2012/photos/dummy-industry/2012/jun/7/253032/#1-prince-alwaleed-bin-talal-al-saudeight-years-of-the-arabian-business-power-list-and-eight-years

        These people want world domination by Islam. They don’t just own oil, but they dabble in finance and communications. They also own the largest factories in the world, like Dubai-Based Super Max is the largest maker of razors in the world, and Arab men don’t even shave.

        http://www.supermaxworld.com/#

        They’re jealous of the West and they want to take it over. Wake up!

        Like


    • Like voting for Hitler was a bad thing…

      Like


      • At least the German women were gushing over one of their own… a man who, before the war started, was a true champion of his folk and restored their rightful place as a dominant part of Europe.

        Like


      • Really????? That’s news to me.

        And what did he do to his “folk” when he was losing the war? He turned on them and said they deserve to be destroyed.

        Hence, he was nothing but a demagogue and a megalomaniac, looking out for himself and willing to sacrifice his own people for his ambitions.

        Why so much nostalgia for Hitler?

        Just because he said things you like about Germany and hated the Jews, you’re all hot and bothered? It’s not enough to get me smitten.

        What’s up with the simpletonian thinking? I thought you were way deeper than that.

        Like


      • on October 6, 2012 at 1:59 pm gunslingergregi

        why they always got to eqaute whites tired of bullshit and hitler

        Like


      • What exactly about my qualifier “before the war” did you not understand?

        Stifle, dingbat.

        Like


      • I just can’t have another Hitler argument.

        Instead: the moralizers can go commit Selbstmord gegen Rechts.

        Like


      • I got your before the war qualifier. But what did he do exactly to get them all infatuated with his aura before the war?

        You say, “a true champion of his folk and restored their rightful place as a dominant part of Europe.”

        That’s my whole point – he wasn’t their champion. He was nothing but a demagogue spewing words he knew people want to hear. He was appealing to their emotions, just as Obama is doing.

        Obama spews meaningless words; he knows what people want to hear and he pushes all their buttons.

        Hitler did exactly the same thing – use words to incite and arouse feelings. His words attracted evil people and useful idiots alike to do his bidding. Same thing with Obama. He has evil radicals sitting with him in the white house, as well as useful idiots on the street and the media doing his bidding. It seems all demagogues follow the same path to power. Just thank God, Obama is an idiot compared to Hitler, or we’re fucked.

        Like


      • [audio src="http://www.maximumdonline.com/tvwavs/stifle.wav" /]

        Like


      • Mere words didn’t build the autobahns, for one, dearie… let alone an air force, navy, and army that could rival all others at the time.

        Like


      • Ok, so he built an army and infrastructure. So what? Where did it get him and Germany within 10 years?

        In any case, those were the requirements he needed to further his maglomainc ambitions. Nothing more. It’s nothing proving his accomplishments; quite the opposite.

        Same thing with Obama; his supports bring Ben Laden and GM as examples of his greatness. Both were just self-serving accomplishments – GM for the Unions and Ben Laden because he couldn’t as a US president reject his killing or never win reelection. By all accounts, he was very conflicted about killing Ben laden. He believes we deserved it, as all America haters do. The man thinks his mission is to weaken American power and influence.

        Bottom line, if God wanted Hitler to win, he would have won. Don’t kid yourself. But Hitler is the antithesis of everything God is. Let’s see what plans God has for Obama.

        Like


      • Ok, so he built an army and infrastructure. So what?

        Let’s have a little more respect for the building of armies and infrastructure, dearie.

        (this line alone makes me pretty sure you’re a woman, though others have gainsaid)

        “But Hitler is the antithesis of everything God is.

        Not everything… indeed, many atheists and Jews complain about alleged New Testament antisemitism, e.g., “Let His blood be upon us!”, “synagogue of Satan”, etc., etc.

        Point is, though, you keep mistaking given credit where credit is due for “worship”.

        And my house serves Jehovah… I’m interested in the new life coming, not resurrecting the dead past.

        Like


      • No, no. You misunderstand me sweetie pie. I think a strong army is very important. The point is though, for what purpose is one building his army? Is it to protect sovereignty, borders, and his people form invaders, or is it to wage war on other nations for superior-race notion? Can’t you see Muslims doing the same thing since they think their religion is superior? Hitler has a lot in common with other demagogues and fanatics. Christianity is not about fanaticism. It’s about benevolence and morality.

        “And my house serves Jehovah… “
        I hope it does.

        “I’m interested in the new life coming, not resurrecting the dead past.”
        Sounds Good!

        Like


      • Christianity is not about fanaticism. It’s about benevolence and morality.

        Sigh… yet another namby-pamby warm fuzzy view of Christianity through PC eyes. Let me enlighten you a bit… benevolence only towards His own… and morality according to HIS standard, not yours, not mine.

        “Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.”

        “Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?”

        “And he entered the temple and began to drive out those who sold and those who bought in the temple, and he overturned the tables of the money-changers…”

        Like


      • “Just thank God, Obama is an idiot compared to Hitler, or we’re fucked.”

        Wait, wait! I take that back. Maybe Obama is stupid, but he has evil America-haters surrounding him. If he wins 2012 he’ll drastically change this country, and I wouldn’t put it past these evil people surrounding him to keep him in the White House as a figurehead while they are running the country and changing it in their image. All they have to do is start WW III as excuse to forgo elections and create Roosevelt-like conditions.

        I see riots in the streets in 2016 to keep him in power. If he loses 2012, expect riots too. The uncivilized are upon us.

        Like


      • “Ok, so he built an army and infrastructure. So what? ”

        Prior to which, Germans were stuffing their shoes with worthless deutschmarks and eating rotten kartoffeln, while their young women were flocking to the cities to whore themselves out to wealthy Jews. Let’s just leave the Jewish Bolshevik agitations and the French decision to put kaffir troops in the Ruhr.

        Whatever, who fucking cares. THE WHITE RACE IS FINISHED THANKS TO ADOLF HITLER AND POST-WAR JEWRY. Go do a dance motherfucker. You have your way, by 2050 or even earlier we’ll be a minority. You win! Woohoo!

        Like


      • “Sigh… yet another namby-pamby warm fuzzy view of Christianity through PC eyes. Let me enlighten you a bit… benevolence only towards His own… and morality according to HIS standard, not yours, not mine.”

        Let’s cut the crap, I mean Biblical morality. Hitler transgressed against it all. He didn’t keep even one of the 10 Commandments, or any of God’s laws found in the Bible. Stop pontificating honey bunny.

        Like


      • WOOHOOOOO!!!!

        WHITE PEOPLE ARE GOING EXTINCT!! IT’S SO AWESOME AND PROGRESSIVE!!

        ICH❤ VOLKSTOD THAT MAKES THUPERIORRRR WOOOOHOOOOOOOO ;LZZLZOZOZOZOZOZ

        LOZOZOZO STUPID NAZI WHITE PEOPLE ARENT GOING EKTHINCT THATS SO DUMB NAZI FUCK YOU WANNA KILL SOME BLAX SMALL DICK LOZOZZOZOZOOZZZZZZZZZZZ

        /THUPERIORORORORORORORORROORROORLLZLZLZOZOZOZOZOZOZOZOZOZOZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

        Like


      • “Still you trust the times, you believe all is well.
        You are unready for sacrifice, you don’t understand our struggle, our rage.
        But your life is proof: all their wealth paralyzes your courage.
        Face it: you pay the price of silence with your blood.

        But life will catch up with you, and you can free yourself
        Only if you accept that you have been practicing race-death.
        It is their religion, and healthy peoples reduce their profits.
        They will fall — and you with them. Can you not see it?”

        Like


      • Let’s cut the crap, I mean Biblical morality. Hitler transgressed against it all. He didn’t keep even one of the 10 Commandments, or any of God’s laws found in the Bible. Stop pontificating honey bunny.

        I thought you said you wanted to ‘cut the crap’… and yet you speculate wildly.

        “My father I respected, but my mother I loved.” – from Mein Kampf, if memory serves.

        Whether or not he himself stole, murdered (he was twice decorated with the Iron Cross, but I don’t think killing the enemy counts as ‘murder’, according to the true translation of Commandment 6), committed adultery, or coveted his neighbor’s ass, manservant or maidservant I cannot say.

        Like


      • So you want to get literal, eh? No problem.

        “My father I respected, but my mother I loved.” – from Mein Kampf, if memory serves.”

        As far as that commandment, who the hell knows what he did in his screwed-up childhood. I wouldn’t take the words of a self-serving murdering megalomaniac as gospel.

        On another note, my, my, my…….I thought you said you don’t worship him and you’re not enamored, yet you quote “Mein Kampf”? Please, stop kidding yourself; you love him.

        A lot of you are infatuated with Hitler and his supposed “alpha” behavior, like it would have been some white race Utopia to be ruled under him. Your admiration of him is clouding your judgment. You don’t realize that he would have dealt with you very harshly once he was free to focus on internal German affairs. He was a totalitarian demagogue, drunk with power. No benevolence in him for anyone, not even his “beloved” Aryan race. Furthermore, he and his cohorts stole 100s of millions of dollars in property form his citizen and others. Therefore, everyone would be a worker of the state under him while he pillaged. There was no honor in him and like Uh said, “THE WHITE RACE IS FINISHED THANKS TO ADOLF HITLER AND POST-WAR JEWRY.” I agree Hitler didn’t help the white race. He was an abomination to the white race and later became an excuse for Anti-whites and various liberals who used him as a reason the white man’s power should be curtailed and contained. Hitler’s killings and war mongering (now he was a real war monger) didn’t do anyone any favors. Stop with this misguided Hitler worship darlings. What we need is to bring back good old fashion values, the way things were in the 50s before the sexual revolution destroyed everything wholesome.

        “I thought you said you wanted to ‘cut the crap’… and yet you speculate wildly.”

        I’m not speculating. Hitler wasn’t serving The Lord. He hated God and didn’t follow any of his commandments. In fact, he spoke of paganism. Now again you’re kidding yourself.

        “Whether or not he himself stole, murdered (he was twice decorated with the Iron Cross, but I don’t think killing the enemy counts as ‘murder’,”

        Really????? LOL…..how convenient of you!!! So murdering millions of innocent people is not murder in your eyes because you call them the enemy. Either you’re kidding yourself, or your set of values is out of kilter despite all the God preaching you do. Face the truth, even though it’s hard for you to do: He was a murdering madman, and if he could murder people in cold blood with the excuse they’re the enemy, he could turn his sword at his own people with any justification he could make up. Hitler is no friend of whites. Hitler was an anathema and a curse to whites.

        “according to the true translation of Commandment 6), committed adultery, or coveted his neighbor’s ass, manservant or maidservant I cannot say.”

        Who knows what he has done with married women, but this commandment regarding coveting includes all kinds of envious behavior where stealing something which doesn’t belong to you comes into play. Whether it’s someone else’s woman, land, or property, it’s all the same type of action. And we know he did a lot of coveting and stealing, don’t we? Nuff said!

        Like


      • dr; tl

        Like


      • Your loss, luv.

        But then again……when you lost the debate and you have nothing to say, silence is golden.

        Like


      • Your ridiculous speculations about Hitler and inability to comprehend how remembering a quote from required reading in college doesn’t equal infatuation rendered further conversation moot.

        But if it makes you tingle, feel free to imagine that you’ve won something.

        Like


      • lllloolllzzzzlllooollll

        Don’t hurt your shoulder, patting yourself on the back like that.

        Like


      • Jesus, how can you spend so much time and energy arguing with this trollish cunt?

        You can be 100% right and she’ll never accept it. There’s a reason why people say women never lose arguments. Its because they obfuscate the point, and derail to another direction. Not only that, information overload is another tactic. Just see the wall of text above.

        “Oh maybe if I write something ridiculously long people will think I’m smart, and know what I’m talking about. And It will be so long no one will want to go through it all to call me on my bullshit. Go me!!”

        Just smile and nod, knowing that her hamster is spinning out of control.

        Like


  2. One thing about Romney, of all the GOP contenders, he was the least open-borders nut among them. So, we got that going for us. One can hope.

    Like


  3. I wish I could have lived before the sexual revolution. The country has been rapidly declining since then.

    Like


    • There is one advantage that decades of left governments: easy punani.

      Like


      • Destroying the west so a few people can get laid easier doesn’t seem like a good trade off. Eventually there will be blood. I mean, I guess it’s better than having all these lefty policies and not getting the easy punani but it stills seems retarded.

        Like


      • Peter is engaged in niggardly thinking.

        Like


      • You’re not allowed to use that word.

        “Peter,” I mean.

        Like


      • “There is one advantage that decades of left governments: easy punani.”

        Easy for who? It’s gotten a lot harder for the humble hardworking men that were bedrock of previous civilization.

        Like


  4. The more things slide, the more valuable you become

    Like


  5. “The Life of Julia” campaign theme for Obama. Google it if you don’t know what it is. “State Enabled Hypergamy” would have been a better title…

    Like


  6. ok, i know you’re against female suffrage … but do you realize it is impossible to do anything about that? You can’t just take us the right to vote and this will NEVER happen, u know.

    Like


    • Nah, women are dying give up their rights for security. Writ large, it’s female support for Progressivism. Writ small, it’s obedience to men in order to survive.

      In every period of social collapse, women’s right collapse too. It’s only a matter of time, sister.

      [heartiste: correct. when the shtf, women will answer to men. it won’t be the other way around. only times of relative plenty allow that luxury.]

      Like


      • It won’t be long until their golden goose croaks either. Women only live in the present and have no idea that the government can’t be their sugar daddy forever…while men have an idea what consequences to actions will do in the future.

        Like


      • there will be no wars in the future. at least not where civilized people live.

        Like


      • Just wait and watch what happens when the EBT cards and food stamp accounts stop getting replenished for a few months.

        Like


      • Kristen is technically CORRECT.

        There will be no wars where civilized people live… merely rioting and collapse where the uncivilized live.

        War requires strategy, planning, and is an outgrowth of political actions… the same skills that lead to empire building. The evidence of black people accomplishing any of those things is scant.

        Like


      • who said anything about black people? It was white people cutting off other white peoples heads in France.

        Like


      • Yeah, black people never fought tribal wars in Africa before contact with whites. Give me a fucking break. Do you even believe your own bullshit?

        Like


      • “Yeah, black people never fought tribal wars in Africa before contact with whites. Give me a fucking break.”

        Getting together with a few boys to throw spears at a neighboring tribe, to get at their cows, isn’t exactly war. We call that a “drive-by” today.

        Like


      • Anon, during 17th -18th century, Kingdom of Benin was a top dog in Western sub-Saharan Africa, They found a slave trade a lucrative endeavor, but after a while, they were running out of criminals to sell. So, the kingdom employed its military might to start wars to get more meat to sell. Once they got their first prisoners of wars, the trade really took off. It was no small change, the demand was high and thousands of slaves were sold, and due their mortality rate, more was ever needed. The kingdom had its military reach from Senegal to today’s eastern border of Nigeria. I think in this instance all your conditions are satisfied.

        Also, check Xhosha and Zulu wars. Definitely not a handful of warrior wannabes with spears.

        Like


      • Yeah, i’m gonna get more punani in my Infiniti SUV and Zegna suit than I can possibly handle.

        Like


      • When the Chinese Army is in the streets of San Francisco shooting people in the face, comments like this one will look even dumber in retrospect than they do now.

        Like


      • If they were occupying SanFran, I’d have no problem giving that city the Sodom and Gomorrah treatment.

        Like


      • Nothing new. One guy named Norman Angell claimed there would be no more major wars because the civilized nations of the world were too economically intertwined to allow it. In 1909. Ten years later the world was chanting “never again.” And so on.

        Like


      • Why the fuck would China want to be in SF???

        SF has no natural resources other than fags, hairy-legged women, hippies, and semi-literate Mexicans. Not sure China desires those things.

        Like


      • They’d want the Silicon Valley area – and most of the people there would willingly submit to their Chinese overlords because they all read Tom Friedman.

        Like


      • “semi-literate Mexicans”

        And don’t forget full-fledged Marxists in next-door Fresno, voting for crippling EPA regulation and sanctuaries for illegals. The whole state is turning into the wayward son.

        Like


      • “SF has no natural resources other than fags, hairy-legged women, hippies, and semi-literate Mexicans. Not sure China desires those things.”

        And the best (perhaps second or third considering the relative merits of VC or SD) natural harbor on the West Coast of North or South America. But let’s let facts get in the way😉

        Like


      • The land they are residing on, on the other hand, is quite valuable. The chinese would want that.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 1:00 am Mr. Pointyface

        I’m taking bets on this one. How soon until you imagine the chinese army is in SF? Anyone want to hold the money of this fool? I expect sudden silence from you, Wrecked ‘Em the Moron.

        Like


      • The sonic whoosh you just heard was his use of hyperbole to make a point flying at Mach 3 over your head, dweeb.

        It’s amazing that you cog dis agents can breath and chew gum at the same time.

        Like


      • China is not going to be invading SF. What is going to happen is that the whole south west part of the U.S. is going to break off and form a proxy nation to Mexico, lets call it El Norte. Mexico won’t be able to openly take it since what’s left of the U.S. is going to be sitting on a shit load of nukes and will be in a very, very ill mood.

        Like


      • They wouldn’t make it across the Pacific. Do you know the history of China? They are usually the ones being attacked. Their bubble is going to pop harder than Japan’s did.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 2:40 pm Hugh G. Rection

        You are of course assuming that the people who you consider civilized now will remain so for all of the future, which would be a first, mind you I’m assuming the future will be going on for a lot longer than the past.

        Maybe not in your lifetime, but even that kind of statement shows an utter lack of imagination.

        Like


      • Uh! Pretty much every nominal “war” on TV these days seem to be raging in civilized parts of the world, against post civilized invaders.

        Like


      • Darling, do you realize how idiotic that is?

        Like


      • You’re smokin’ crack honey. The west (civilized) is in a proxy war in Syria and is trying to start one in Iran. Let’s see if Russia and China bring it to us.

        Like


      • Thomas Sowell once said, “civilization is a thin crust covering the top of a volcano and the liberals keep picking at the crust.”

        Like


      • I love Thomas Sowell. He’s smart, yet he’s black. He hates libs.

        0.02% of blacks can think.

        Like


      • Nice thought…Beirut was a pretty civilized place in the ’50s and ’60s before the shit suddenly hit the fan in the early ’70s. Sometimes “civilization” can be just a thinly disguised veneer for a tinderbox ready for the spark.

        Like


    • Once the government dissolves due to its inability to pay its debts, and when the white, middle-class dudes who own all the guns get done killing off all the rioting assholes in the urban centers, guess who won’t be getting the right to vote when they re-form it?

      Like


    • @Kristen

      You believe that it is impossible to lose the right to vote?

      You’re so cute!

      Like


      • yeah, i believe it’s impossible.

        Like


      • One word, sweetie: Prohibition.

        Like


      • You are foolish to think it is impossible to lose the right to vote. Read a bit of history and you will see many recent examples of the falls of empires, and of the destruction of society. For that matter, men can also lose the right to vote.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 7:48 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        No, it’s very possible and it’s called Sharia Law.

        There are four Muslim children born for every white one. Even if there is no holy war, the numbers are on the side of Sharia Law eventually being enacted simply because there will be enough Muslims to vote it into law in whichever country they choose.

        White women killed the society by being liberated and not having kids and therefore sowed the seeds for the end of their own liberation and basic human rights.

        Like


      • And they are going to what walk across the ocean? Most of them are poor, illiterate, and going to be a problem for their own country. Mexican cartels and internal groups are the biggest domestic threats alongside hyper partisanship.

        Like


      • on October 6, 2012 at 8:05 am Days of Broken Arrows

        They’re immigrating to the US and Britain or being born on home soil. Judges are considering letting sections of both countries where Muslims congregate use Sharia Law. In 50 years the game will be changed because whites will be outnumbered.

        This is how the Native Americans became extinct. When asked how they lost to whites, one Indian chief wrote something like “We fought well, it was our land, but they just kept coming and coming.” Numbers win out and they have the numbers.

        Like


      • The mark of Satan is easily discerned… anything which inevitably plants the seeds of its own destruction whilst attempting to ruin its intended target(s).

        Like


      • “…..it’s very possible and it’s called Sharia Law.”

        Right! They are moving here at the speed of light, so that in 10 years we’re going to have a major Islamic problem in this country; we don’t even have to wait 50 years. Between the Muslims and the Hispanic immigrating here or coming illegally having large families, and whites almost not having children, Whites will be an endangered species soon. The pillars and spirit on which this country is built, the very reasons for its existence, will be replaced with backward principles like Sharia. Turning sections of the country Islamic is a fast track to the US breaking up to smaller countries. The Obama white house has radicals that dream of that day. Liberalism destroys itself.

        Like


      • @ Kristen

        You’re trolling.

        Like


      • You are confusing that is inconceivable to you for what is impossible, sweetheart.

        Like


      • The interesting question is what we get to vote about.

        Like


      • Oh those fillies! They think because they have something now…it can never be taken away or only get better in the future.

        Hypergamy at it’s finest.

        Like


      • It is amazing isn’t it? Makes me think of the quote Rollo uses to head Rational Male – “Why do my eyes hurt?”

        Like


      • whatever. women will always have a right to vote i’m sure. you have no arguments against what i’m saying.

        Like


      • Look at the immigration video I posted below. We’re importing millions from countries where men don’t want their women feminized. Give it time snowflake.

        Like


      • “whatever.” – Yet another shining example of what passes for logical argument in the female mind.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 2:44 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Over the course of recorded history, it has been far more likely for people to be stripped of individual rights instead of gaining them. Especially people who can’t put up a fight.

        Like


      • Correction. Women will have the right to vote as long as Men allow them to.

        Like


      • You are a very good troll.

        Like


      • What about birth rates and immigration rates in Europe? You think the guys and gals on the winning side of that one, are clamoring for “voting rights”?

        If women voting is to remain a permanent fixture, one way or the other people for whom female suffrage is important must remain a voting majority. Meaning, those people need to at least keep up in the breeding race. Or, for completeness, reassess their opposition to genocide.

        Like


      • She dipped in from OKCupid for a minute. Just keeping the attention wheel turning.

        Like


      • Kristen, I don’t know whether you are a blonde, but you are definitely dumber than a box of rocks.

        Like


      • There seems to be something no one is mentioning. Now correct me if I’m wrong but in America once you’ve been convicted of a crime and sent to prison you lose your right to vote forever.
        The way the system is at the moment massive numbers of men are arrested for practically anything as long as it fills the jails and the pockets of those that profit from it. So already in America a huge number of people are losing the right to vote but the overwhelming majority of them are men. And these aren’t all mindless criminals, they are divorced dads that couldn’t keep up the payments, the sad beta and their awkward advances that were re-framed into a sex crime, the law abiding citizen that dared indulge in some casual drug use and so on…
        As a result women’s votes will become more and more important because if you have a rough 50-50 split in gender throughout the population but a much higher percentage of men incarcerated and therefore unable to vote then courting the female vote will always get you a better return in the polls.

        Like


      • Good observation and yes, its a deliberate policy. Expect it to accelerate as women become the majority of lawyers.

        Like


    • Female suffrage is not the issue, had it been used to better of all of society as a whole. The problem with feminism is that it’s misusing the power of the state to take power away from men so women can have permissive non-judgmental lifestyle. i.e. sex with multiple partners, children out of wedlock, free birth control paid for by the state, courts awarding women custody and child/spousal support while the father is only referred as the sperm donor, affirmative action, same-sex unions/marriage, and other various catalysts which serve to break down the family and the social order. They do it in academia, the courts, the armed forces, the private sector – everywhere possible – so that there is no law and order, unless it is favorable to woman’s needs. It’s a fact, in female-controlled societies, permissiveness and chaos go up, social order diminish. In patriarchal societies, it’s reversed. The social order is strong, permissiveness weaken.

      Women misuse their newfound power, and so do welfare recipients. They vote for themselves more friendly policies and more entitlements. Same thing with gays; they’ll vote for someone who is pro-gay rights, not for someone who is good for the country. Blacks vote based on race too, which is the stupidest reason to vote for someone. They know Obama mamma is not worth a bag of shit, yet they call anyone who’s anti-Obama, racist. Feminists/gays/Obama voters/liberals all the same shit. All should be prohibited from voting.

      Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 2:54 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Women basically want a monopoly on judgement. She can judge reject men as she chooses, but men are not free to reject/judge her or her choices, ever.

        Like


      • Women are exceedingly plagued with irrational double stands. That’s why she can reject, but a man is a wicked angry misogynist when he passes judgment on her behavior.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 7:51 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        Don’t forget that women filter OK Cupid so that one inch of height in the wrong direction or a few thousand less in salary gets you automatically disqualified.

        But if you make noise about women being overweight, you’re judgmental, bigoted, misogynistic, and a BULLY!!!!!!!!!

        Like


      • 100% true. They can’t forgive a man having his type, yet they all have one type – the kind you described and they are not ashamed about repeating it.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 10:43 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Yeah that’s part of what I referred to. There is a thread on the forum over at Roosh (which also links to a hilarious thread of a guy trolling these women) about the dating site hamster. It’s like a sinister Cartel of substandard poon. In the USA an overweight chick is technically still “average” weight. The market is so slanted by all these waddling battlecruisers that you gotta be an “above average” guy to just get a slighty below average girl. So you gotta be better than half the people.

        But you don’t get to complain.

        Like


      • That’s why one should go foreign.

        Like


      • “In the USA an overweight chick is technically still “average” weight.”

        So true; I’m a size 2 and that’s too big. It seems designers resize clothes for the ever-expanding waist of the American woman. You can be a size 6 and fit in a size 2. That’s a false sense of thinness, if I ever seen one. A true size 2 has to have designer clothes refitted.

        “The market is so slanted by all these waddling battlecruisers that you gotta be an “above average” guy to just get a slighty below average girl. So you gotta be better than half the people. “

        Actually, I know lots of attractive and quality girls hook up with below-average guys. In fact, why do you think women go gag over Obama? Because they don’t know the meaning of quality anymore. This issue of below par plagues both sexes.

        Like


      • “Female suffrage is not the issue, had it been used to better of all of society as a whole.”

        Suffrage = female clout. How is that in our interest as men?

        Hamster away.

        “Blacks vote based on race too, which is the stupidest reason to vote for someone.”

        In fact it is not. This very post is about how stupid white women are for voting for top-dog black lover.

        Like


      • You got to see the whole picture, not just how it affects you. If female suffrage were good for something, I’d be behind it. Unfortunately, it only causes problems.

        The top-dog black lover comment, what do you mean?

        White women will vote for anyone the Democrats put as candidate, even a serial killer. As long as he speaks the party liberal agenda favorable to them, they couldn’t care less about his character. That’s how selfish and bad they are. Are you surprised they are luuuuving a black candidate? Next week they’ll vote for Jack the Ripper if he promised them garbage entitlements and no-strings attached permissiveness.

        Like


      • Give women an inch…they’ll take a mile.

        Like


      • I only ever give women an inch, but that has nothing to do with principles.

        Like


      • IOW, domination.

        Like


      • I give women 9 inches. But then I’d have to fuck her twice.

        Like


    • I don’t see this as a gender issue. What we need is
      “NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION”, i.e. net
      “takers” via govt employ or welfare in any form should not be
      allowed to vote. Only taxpayers who are net payers should be
      allowed to vote. This is very democratic, I get one vote,
      Bill Gates gets one vote – bot people on welfare get zero votes.
      .
      Now, Kristen is right that this “won’t happen”. Well, it won’t,
      not until the country crashes – we might not have to wait very long –
      and a major reset becomes necessary. Then we can make it happen.

      Thor

      Like


      • I think it’s a gender issue as well as everything else, but regardless, people on welfare shouldn’t be allowed to vote. Now illegals and the dead are voting too, that’s why the Dems don’t want ID’s. It’s a free for all. Past, present, and future, everyone is voting.

        Like


      • For “no representation without taxation” to be a “good system”, we also need “no regulation without representation.” Essentially a government by those who want it, for those who want it at the current price (tax rate).

        Like


    • More and more women will come to recognize the perils of OTHER women voting. Not necessarily themselves, but they will be willing to take one for the team.

      Look for it to happen regionally, as pockets of remaining semicivilization actively starts disengaging from their Dystopian hinterlands.

      And it’s not about “taking the vote away fro women.” But rather about recognizing one vote per household/property owning household or somesuch. If Mr. Bitch is happy wit Ms Manjaw deciding whom to vote for……

      And in case I’m being unreasonably optimistic on behalf of my fellow countrymen; should all else fail, at least there will always be the Afghans, and people like them. 8 kids per woman, each taught to stand up for him/herself, and to keep up the reproductive pace. Even if Western Europeans should display sufficiently widespread stupidity to keep up the childless votebot woman ideal of our progressive Dystopia; they’ll just be unceremoniously replaced. And then, in a twist on the song; “First they take Berlin, then they take Manhattan”

      Like


    • “You can’t just take us the right to vote and this will NEVER happen, u know.”

      When the Welfare state crumbles, you’ll be begging to be deprived of the right to vote.

      But, of course, the trouble with the West isn’t that women votes for bad candidates. The trouble is the I D E A S that rule our culture: anti-reason, which leads to irrationalism, which leads to self-sacrifice as a moral ideal, which leads to statism to enforce this alleged moral ideal…

      Women had better sense when better ideas ruled the West, during the Enlightenment.

      Like


      • “which leads to self-sacrifice as a moral ideal, which leads to statism to enforce this alleged moral ideal…”

        Depends on whose morality. I don’t believe I should pay more in taxes so that some lazy loser gets an EBT card, a cell phone, and a membership to the gym paid for by the taxpayers. This sacrifice-type brainwashing has been used by the left to make Americans feel bad about their achievements and prosperity. I don’t know if you guys saw this video already, which has had more than 2.5 M hits on YouTube, but either way, it’s worth seeing again and again.

        See how they make decent unsuspecting Americans feel bad about having economic power and control of their own future. In fact, I think Jason needs to see this. This is Obama 101. See how he uses indoctrination and persuasion tactics to appeal to the emotions.

        This is the follow-up video by the guys who put this together (www.Freemarketamerica.com)

        He was a guest on Stossel recently.

        This was based on one of Paul Harvey’s amazing prophetic visions from 1965. If this doesn’t apply today, I don’t know what does.

        Like


    • on October 5, 2012 at 12:45 am Mr. Pointyface

      Yeah, I love it when the guys are so wingnutty I have to side with the chix. Talking about facing reality….taking away the vote from women? Stopping Hispanic immigration when both parties are totally totally dependent on them for votes and cheap garden labor? I mean I know you believe in God and all that, but even HE wouldn’t believe ANY of that shit’s going to happen.

      Why don’t you make up a fairy tale that’s somewhat more credible, it will make for more entertaining fantasy.

      Here’s my prediction: O wins, and women are still voting, say two elections from now. Any takers on bets?

      Poor widdle babies, didn’t get on the Halliburton blood money war profiteer train, and you missed the Federal pension train!! You lost?

      Like


      • Here’s my prediction: O wins, and women are still voting, say two elections from now. Any takers on bets?

        A blind man could see O getting reelected, so no cookie for you there.

        As far as betting, we’re going to have little use of bernakified bucks, even if the dollar did regain some of its former value.

        “But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only. As were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of man. For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and they did not know until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of man.

        Like


      • You have to side with the “chix” because you are one, beta boy.

        Like


      • It’s Jason as a sock puppet… I had suspected it for awhile, but the baby-talk barb gave him away for sure, this time.

        Showing one’s ass hasn’t been this raucous since September Morn.

        Like


      • I don’t use sock puppets, Greg Eliot.

        It’s hard for the hate machine to believe, but more than one person on this earth believes in tolerance.

        Also, if you pay close attention, you’ll see he uses ellipses and exclamation points. Which alphas don’t do.

        But I do love stirring this pot of hateful motherfuckers. You guys laugh when I say that I love to fight, but it’s true. I like to be reminded of man’s inhumanity to man.

        Signing off now — too busy to spread the love any further.

        Like


      • Also, if you pay close attention, you’ll see he uses ellipses and exclamation points. Which alphas don’t do.

        looozzzllllooozzzlllll

        I hadn’t realized alphas get their own version of Strunk & White.

        Like


  7. Decent analysis, but you’ve overlooked the major problem that most thinking people have with Romney: he’s an economic vampire.

    The dude spent his adult life in a private equity firm, sucking the blood out of dying companies. He doesn’t care about anybody who is disadvantaged in any way. He used the word “crushing” three times last night to describe life in the middle class … yet is betting on us forgetting that he’s the person *doing* the crushing.

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/greed-and-debt-the-true-story-of-mitt-romney-and-bain-capital-20120829

    If you make less than a million dollars a year, voting for Romney is idiotic.

    Why Obama didn’t hammer him harder on his contradictions in the debate is beyond me. Maybe Obama was using aloof alpha game. Maybe he wanted to be seen as presidential. Maybe he was being too polite. Or maybe he figures that Romney is doing a decent job destroying himself with that 47% comment.

    Also, challengers historically are perceived to “win” the first debate anyways. Remember Kerry wiping the floor with Bush during their first debate? How’d that turn out for him in the end?

    Like


    • You sound like you’re listening to your wife a little too much, eh?

      Like


      • Heh, heh… if he knows what’s good for him.

        Rolling Stone, Village Voice, South Park, Comedy Central… these are organs which pump blood to the brains of these SWPL shabbos goy useful idiots, whence they form their politics.

        Pffft on the entire electoral process and the flat jest it’s become.

        Like


      • Did you bother to read the article? Or would it create too much cognitive dissonance in your widdle bwain?

        Like


      • You even baby-talk like a cunt. I can hear your wife in you.

        Like


      • Cute, but my wife doesn’t give a shit about politics. She literally asks me who to vote for.

        Read the linked article so we can have a real discussion about it. Or you can run away from facts and name call — your usual modus operandi.

        Like


      • You wouldn’t know a real discussion if it bit you on the backside… all you know is your leftist double-think, and I’ve been through that too much in my lifetime to give it the time of day.

        Mockery is all you deserve… and since you like consensus, check out the consensus on that account on this very thread, newspeak lickspittle.

        Like


      • No, Greg Eliot, read the article, and come back with a one-paragraph summary. Then sit on your piece of carpet until the teacher comes over to collect it.

        Like


      • No, Greg Eliot, read the article, and come back with a one-paragraph summary. Then sit on your piece of carpet until the teacher comes over to collect it.

        llloollzzzzoolllll

        Jason relives his glory days as hall monitor.

        Like


      • I don’t mean to be rude to you, and my comment was more tongue n’ cheek.

        But honestly, you got to understand the economy and the free-market place to understand that a business has survival mechanism just as a person has. That’s what juvenile liberals don’t understand at the RollingStones, which is why they say business is “sucking the blood”. You can’t listen to liberals on economy. All they do is hammer business. This is just as bad a watching MSNBC. You’re wasting your time on such trash. Start reading the Wall Street Journal to get a better perspective. Then move to more serious reading.

        Like


      • It was written by Matt Taibbi. He’s a fool. As I recall, he screamed his lungs out about the BIG BANKS during the 2008-09 meltdown and never uttered a single word about Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. I’d put 1000x as much credence in a Paul Krugman article than I would in anything written by Taibbi.

        Like


      • Taibbi’s research is impeccable. He’s one of the few doing real investigative journalism.

        Not sure about the Fannie/Freddie thing, but seeing as they’re quasi-governmental bodies, yeah, it was probably an oversight.

        Like


      • The article is pure anticapitalist crap. A critique of it would be quite easy, but time consuming; every other sentence is just plain bullshit.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 9:33 am RappaccinisDaughter

        The South Park guys are libertarians and have an excellent record of lambasting both sides of the political spectrum. Remember “Turd Sandwich vs. Douche”?

        Like


      • The point isn’t merely ‘political spectrum’… the point is snark.

        And for every ‘lambast’ of PC they shoot ten volleys at traditional values.

        Now tend to your kitchen, woman… there are men talking here.

        Like


      • Sand in your vagina, Greg?

        Like


      • True grit in my bowels, asshole.

        Like


      • Well said, Greg. Keeper.

        Like


      • I even think they lean right on social issues.

        Like


      • Not hardly… I must have missed that episode.

        Like


      • Having a blatant unPC character is not “leaning right”… no more than All In The Family was leaning right.

        Like


      • I think you’ve missed a lot of SP episodes.

        Like


      • Right, like I’m going to listen to someone who get’s their opinions on finance from Rolling Stone. Yeah – I learned everything I know about rock & roll by reading Barron’s?

        What a douche.

        Newsflash: if you pay taxes, you’re paying more than your fair share.
        If you pay taxes; you’re nothing but a slave to a lazy, unproductive, and feckless underclass.

        Personally, I look forward to the coming collapse and subsequent reckoning, ’cause here’s a little something you haven’t figured out J-ass-on: it turns out, the host doesn’t need the parasites to survive.

        Like


      • Causal flaw.

        I do read much more than Rolling Stone. But you’d best actually look at that magazine before you condemn it. Have you read their feature journalism? It’s the best around. That mag brought down — by his own hand — McChrystal, remember? They did a great piece on drones last month.

        The coming collapse …. really? It’s always end of days with your people.

        Like


    • Mmm, I taste your hot, bitter tears laden with saturated fats.

      Like


    • Faggot whistling past the graveyard. As a white man, you are a political cuckold if you vote Democrat. Want to talk about a “gender gap”? Romney has the support of 65-70% of white men; i.e., the ones who founded, built up, sustained, and died to maintain this playpen you enjoy and are actively dismantling; the ones who also happen to understand just how much the decline has been accelerated by your anti-white, anti-American, SWPL self-hatred. Indeed you enjoy and take for granted this republic so much that you think it happened spontaneously and that it requires no maintenance. You are siding with the daddy-damaged women, illiterate dipshits, ook-ooking minorities, layabout sponges, fence-jumping beaners, and food-stamp parasites of this country.

      The jig is up, jig. Last night was the first time you and your comrades got a glimpse of the two men without the protective distortion filters through which you normally receive your impressions. Maternal impressions and lies which soothingly coo, there, there, everything will be okay, that bad bad “economic vampire” can’t hurt you, Jasey.

      Your most acute beta tell is the squealing omega enmity you have for BSD moneymakers. (Rolling Stone? Matt Taibbi?) Your second worst beta tell is the expectation that such class envy would find an audience here among men.

      Matt

      Like


      • Textbook dressing down… well-done.

        Your most acute beta tell is the squealing omega enmity you have for BSD moneymakers. (Rolling Stone? Matt Taibbi?) Your second worst beta tell is the expectation that such class envy would find an audience here among men.

        One thing I will give ol’ alphie credit for… no matter how many times he gets his ass handed to him on this site, he keeps coming back with the same ol’/lame ol’ song, and takes another good ol’ fashioned ass whuppin’… like that scene between Paul Newman and George Kennedy… except in the case of alphie-who-loves-to-type, nuthin’ ain’t a real cool hand.

        Like


      • Textbook bullshit. The whole point of all this political bullshit is that white men whether they be alphas,banging their hot chickz,or betas,begging for some pussy from their fat wives,or omegas,pulling their miniscule puds while imagining Lebron violating their Aunt Tilly,all of us are SHUT OUT OF THE PROCESS. Do you honestly think MITT has your interests in mind? This is a cocksucker who spent his life taking over companies and piling debt upon them and extracting money and leaving them to go to hell.You guys seem to suck on his chode like he is the 2nd Coming. This prick will not close the borders,get rid of Apefirmative Action, tell the niggers to be self -reliant,stop treating every problem we have as being solved by pouring money down the drain of black schooze,smash a grapefruit into the face of the feminst assholes. He will be Obama,except he will get rid of all the regulations on business, drilling for oil,and sucking money from the people. The peeps sense this and they are about as enthusiastic for Mittens as a 10 would be to suck the shlong of a white knight so-con. Romney may offer a bit more hope than the 1/2 negro idiot;I am voting for him. But..this Greg Eliot shit is just bizarre. Who left the back door open so this dick could sneak in?

        Like


      • You have me mistaken for someone who supports the political process… try your reading comprehension again and see where I mention either of the candidates in re “who to vote for”… on this thread and others, I’ve said numerous times I don’t vote and have no truck with the current political process.

        Or are you merely mad at my skewering of Jason? Another sock-puppet, perhaps.?

        Like


      • “You guys seem to suck on his chode like he is the 2nd Coming.”

        Hardly the case. Mitt leaves much to be desired, BUT he’s 100 times better than Obama. Are you willing to hand over the country to “the daddy-damaged women, illiterate dipshits, ook-ooking minorities, layabout sponges, fence-jumping beaners, and food-stamp parasites of this country,” as Matt puts it? Because that’s who is going to inherit this country at the expense of our blood, sweat, and tears. Why hand it over to them? What have they done of merit, except be burdens and parasites? It’s outrageous that people lash out at Romney when they know Obama is beyond the pale.

        “This prick will not close the borders,get rid of Apefirmative Action, tell the niggers to be self -reliant,stop treating every problem we have as being solved by pouring money down the drain of black schooze,smash a grapefruit into the face of the feminst assholes.”

        No one will do all of that, not even Ron Paul for all his talk. What we need to do is bring about social change through alternative media like Internet and radio. If enough people say they want this type of policy, the politicians will do it or fear losing elections. That’s why the Internet and radio are great tools. Everything else is controlled by the liberals, yet they can’t master radio, and they tried controlling and regulating the internet with ridiculous anti-piracy legislation, but so far have been unsuccessful because of public uproar.

        “He will be Obama, except he will get rid of all the regulations on business, drilling for oil,and sucking money from the people.”

        WRONG!!!!

        Some of this regulation is unnecessary. What we need is not no regulation, but smart regulation. Some of this regulation does nothing but hinder business and give people a false sense of security as if the government has their back or best interest. Bull shit it does. People should do their due diligence and not rely on government regulations that weigh down industry. That said, some regulation is a must, but most is completely frivolous. It gives the various governmental agencies and Congress a reason to exist or conduct sessions. Just remember, each time Congress is in session, it takes away a little bit more of your rights and liberties. Same thing with the agencies setting up regulation and policy. There are so many laws on the books, we’re drowning in it. It’s all trash and should be thrown out with the rest of elected officials and appointees. They are good for nothing, and their laws and regulations are nothing more than a justification of their office. In fact, politics shouldn’t be a full-time job. We don’t need Congress to hold sessions more than 4 times a year. The less they meet, the more of our rights and liberties we retain.

        Like


      • Funny, I thought name-calling was below such preacher types as yourself, Matt King. Then again, you also urged me to cheat on my wife in a previous comment a while back, so you’re persona non grata here.

        I’m choosing the present and future state of my pocketbook over my race, buddy.

        And if you don’t choose the same, you’re a moron. I would much rather live in present-day America than a WN utopia in which 97% of its citizens are living hardscrabble paycheck-to-paycheck lives, due to extremist Republican class warfare values. That’s the con that’s being foisted upon anybody voting for Romney. It’s the same con that Repugs have been playing on the proles for thirty-two years and counting.

        Matt Taibbi is a polemicist, just like you — except, unlike you, he’s got a National Magazine Award and a massive audience that respects him. Also, unlike you, he argues using facts, not generalizations. Take note, preacher.

        Like


      • “I’m choosing the present and future state of my pocketbook over my race, buddy.”

        Here is one of the mechanisms of our undoing as a people. It is this which would have to be reversed to find a means to cohere. Those choosing their wallets over their kind, even extended, non-familial kind — against the wall. No blindfold this time.

        “And if you don’t choose the same, you’re a moron. I would much rather live in present-day America than a WN utopia in which 97% of its citizens are living hardscrabble paycheck-to-paycheck lives,”

        Among their own kind, speaking one language, and not living in anxiety over crime and race-replacement or just the noisy filthy neighbors, not to mention there being billions more dollars afloat from cutting welfare programs for darkies and futile education programs in trying quixotically to educate them; even Obama’s admin, as he noted last night, cut eighteen such failed programs from the budget.

        Poor Jason apparently has never felt the euphoria of moving among masses of people of one’s own kind. This sick creature cares more for the given medium of exchange and wealth than for kinship, which makes him an outlier in an outlier species, where most people of other races would still not sell out their own for a buck.

        And he is here to pose over us as morally superior. Humorous.

        Of course, a Romney admin would guarantee more white blood spillt and more money spent for Israel’s delusions of insecurity, who knows what else. Romney’s Bibi’s butt-boy, as everyone can see. The above must not be construed as a defense of Romney as “the pro-white candidate”. They are both anti-white, because the entire momentum of this country is anti-white.

        Like


      • “I’m choosing the present and future state of my pocketbook over my race, buddy.”

        The confession of a scoundrelly shabbos goy… and then he wonders why he gets skewered by men.

        Like


      • Uh, Romney is the pocket of Israel’s prime minister. They are best-buddies from the days when they raped American taxpayers while working at Bain.

        The white man’s love of money is his undoing. WItness the mass importation of brown immigrants and the kowtowing to Jew bankers.

        Like


      • To be fair, Uh did call Romney “Bibi’s butt boy” near the end. I’m actually hoping Romney loses so the GOP continues a shift toward a Ron Paul-type populist, immigration restrictionist, non-Zionist stance. Having a Republican president would stall that shift, as was seen during the GWB years.

        Also, the brown wave, at least as far as Mexicans are concerned, crested in 2007 and is on a sharp downswing. Hispanic births fell 14% between 2007 and 2011 in absolute terms, and white births are the majority again. It’s sad that we had to get our ashes hauled out of the fire (at least temporarily) by a grinding recession, but there you go. There are more things important than money.

        Like


      • Uh, you apparently prefer that the U.S. becomes a grindingly poor banana republic. Sort of a … white Congo.

        Enjoy that. That fantasy is all yours. But here in the reality-based community, we see things a bit differently.

        Like


      • 1. Whites with modern technology don’t drop to the level of Congoids. If you don’t believe that, a) you are an anti-white fantasist, and b) please step into my Time Musheen ….

        Our first stop will be Argentina, ca. 2001, about to crawl out of economic depression. Yours truly was actually there for two months taking in the sights around Buenos Aires and points south. Ironically, uh had no idea he was in a “depressed” nation, though when he learned of it later, it made sense of some curious things he saw. One of those was good-looking white people on the street. Uh, like most Americans, was used to homeless people being ugly, overweight, filthy, white or black. These people were attractive, looked clean, and mentally healthy: the victims of sudden acute economic crisis (brought on by IMF Jews). So although there were many poor Argentines, there were still huge buildings, buses going to and fro’, people were not starving to death, and not because they were eating each other …

        Which brings us to the DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO, ca. 2001, nearing the end of the Second Congo War. Now what do we find? A body count (in ’01) of approx. three-millions, millions of refugees in neighboring countries; massacre, depredation, starvation, cannibalism, a near collapse of the fragile infrastructure of that beniggered nation … no need for all the details, you surely get the picture …

        *tschhh* opens Time Musheen hatch

        Now, would you like to reconsider your membership in the New Flat Earth Society?

        2. You’re right though — I would gladly take Argentina ca. 2001, or even an all-white shantytown in South Africa, to inhabiting a Jew-run empire of greed with your sort.

        Cheers bitch.

        Like


      • Argentina ca. 2001, or Ukraine now. Very similar.

        Like


      • What I consider fascinating is that some of you decry Zionists (e.g. people that insist on the Jewish state existence and self-actualization within that framework) and confuse them with real scum of the earth, self-hating leftist communitarian internationalist Jews that couldn’t give really a rat ass about Israel (only making some superficial noises for the sake of not being seen as such by peers).

        It shows that leftist demagoguery can really work and seep into opinions and worldview of otherwise reasonable people.

        Israel is a canary in a mine of caliphate. Israels goes, and not that far in the future others follow. I viscerally dislike the idea of caliphate taking a hold here. Therefore I support the canary.

        Like


      • “Israel is a canary in a mine of caliphate. Israels goes, and not that far in the future others follow. I viscerally dislike the idea of caliphate taking a hold here. Therefore I support the canary.”

        Cadnerd,

        Not only are you a voice of fairness, but also a voice of reason.

        First, these guys are confusing self-hating leftists Jews, Jews in name only that don’t understand or have any use for the values of Judaism on which the west and Christianity are standing upon, with conservative Jews who don’t vote Democrat. And you’re right; most leftist globalists Jews don’t care much about Israel, just as they don’t care much about America. All they care about is their communist/socialists agendas, like all liberals do. Everyone with an open mind knows this, but some of these guys here make it sound like all the Jews are the same, purely because they have anti-Semitic sentiments and they are not interested in discerning the difference between the two types of Jews.

        Second, our intellect should tell us that supporting Israel is the right thing to do over allowing Islam to regain their Caliphate. Once the Muslims get their way in destroying Israel, they’ll have their sights on other western countries like the ones in Europe and North America. When the Muslims find any kind of success of any sort, it emboldens them and increases their appetite for world domination. The best way to keep them away is to never ever ever allow them to get any kind of victory. If anything, we should be in Israel’s corner because it’s fighting Islam and not letting it get to the next stage of Europe or North America. Let’s not forget that Islam had some strongholds in Europe a few centuries ago, which it lost since. Islam has never gotten over losing strongholds in Europe, and it has been planning for centuries to get back what it feels belongs to Muslims. Anyone who thinks Islam and sharia law is not coming to America is a fool. Anyone who thinks it’s a good idea to allow another Islamic country to get nuclear weapons is a fool. Within a decade, Islam is going to be a real problem for America. We should be thanking Israel for doing some of the fighting for us, not maligning it with Islamic lies as some of the guys here like to do every day.

        Like


      • A buck created out of thin air by an antagonistic race, no less. Truly deplorable.

        Like


      • Bought and paid for journalist… either a Jew himself or vetted by them, I don’t really feel like googling his background.

        That ilk passes around awards and credentials like candy, so don’t expect that to impress anybody who doesn’t buy into Babylon.

        Like


      • I’m trying to open a real conversation about a piece of investigative financial journalism, and all you, Greg Eliot, can say is … “Jew”.

        You’re really sick.

        Like


      • … or vetted by them.

        Let’s keep the record straight, fanboy.

        Like


      • Run from facts. Run as fast as you can. They might change your worldview.

        Like


      • Let’s see how Jason copes with the fact that whites don’t act like Congoids when they don’t have money.

        Like


      • Let’s see how “uh” copes with the fact that his history teacher skipped the chapter on the 30,000 white people killed by other white people in the French Revolution.

        Fail more.

        Like


      • As your wrote that comment, there was a part of your brain telling you that it was a painfully transparent dodge.

        You ought to nurture it, for it is the honest part.

        Like


      • Actually it was 69K…

        But that was the leftist rabble taking out their envy on the aristos, in the name of your much-vaunted Equality, Liberty, and Brotherhood of Man…

        And this has to do with what, in re the topic at hand?

        Like


      • Has to do with drawing attention away from her self-loathing, anti-white attitude and confused priorities.

        Like


      • Anonymous,

        Thanks bro. It’s ironic because sometimes I think, after my own decade of researching our Unglück, do I have a command of those most economical terms to express this three thousand year-old problem to unenlightened goyim? And find myself wanting. I suppose I’ll go with this one, then.

        Stark,

        You had me at “Kauf’ nicht bei Juden!”

        Like


      • Can you name me five Jewish inventions that have nothing to do with finance?

        Like


      • I’ve sure there are hundreds of inventions by “good” Jews that have helped mankind.

        What’s your point?

        Nobody ever said they were all bad people… just the ones who act as puppetmasters in politics and the media.

        Like


      • Oh, guess what? When I had Facebook for two months, I quizzed my friends on just this: Name one thing invented by a Jew, or Jews, that has benefited white men.

        The only two solid answers were Facebook and the polio vaccine. Facebook, we know, actually works against us insomuch as it is an echo chamber for women. Polio vaccine stands alone.

        Point is, there really are not “hundreds” of inventions by “good Jews” — and that because the good Jews are not the inventive ones: the inventive ones defect from Jewish and Gentile society, and this is where we find Boas, Gould, Freud, Reich, the Second Wave Feminists, etc. etc.

        Like


      • Well, cred where cred is due… blue jeans ain’t so bad.

        Like


      • But point taken… there’ll never be enough “good inventions” from “good Jews” to counteract the destruction and poison their tribal brethren have spread.

        Like


      • For the record, I am saying they are all bad people, for they occupy a unique position among humanity.

        Jews who claim to be religious, and stay within the mainstream of Jewish and Gentile society, are still relatively more inbred than surrounding populations and follow, to the extent that they do, a textual tradition and creed with in-group resentment, revanchism, xenophobia, self-worship, and allowance of out-group exploitation as tenets. It isn’t window-dressing for the dreidl and the candle-lighting: the dreidl and the candle-lighting are window-dressing for the outgroup-hostile psychodrama of Judaism.

        Jews who claim to be unreligion, or “Reform”, or nothing, are defective from the Judaic mainstream but are still relatively highly inbred and eventually pull their weight for the Tribe, always after a protracted rumspringa in which defection from the Gentile mainstream is one of their chief preoccupations, because their ethnocentrism is inherited, and inculcated to some degree either directly transmitted by relatives or through identifying, or being identified as, a Jew.

        In other words: Jews cannot escape Jewish identity, and insomuch as Jewish identity and Judaism are bad for Gentiles, all Jews are bad people, meaning vehicles of a tribal loyalty which will negatively affect Gentiles.

        Of course there are kindly kikes who will tip you, give you a job, “let” you tell Jew jokes, etc., but this is part of their unique psychology — brushing the crumbs of in-group loyalty at one, as it were, and not to be mistaken for true allegiance. They will give you a deal. They will take you into their confidence. They will even hook you up with a job or get you laid if they really like you.

        What they won’t do is take your side against other Jews.

        Like


      • Enjoy.

        Like


      • @uh

        Re: uh @ October 4, 2012 at 4:53 pm

        I’ve researched this shit intensely for over a decade. I have never seen it put more clearly, succinctly, and in layman’s terms, than your comment. You need to achieve mass distribution of this expression.

        Like


      • Stark
        Can you name me five Jewish inventions that have nothing to do with finance?
        ————-

        Hmmm… lets see…

        1. Pornography

        2. Modern art

        3. Pet Rock

        4. Smooth Jazz

        5.

        Like


      • i’m not in the habit of commenting, but uh’s articulate rant begs for it. sadly, he’s more right than wrong. we’d have been better off limiting immigration to christians. i live in nyc and have worked alongside jewish folks, who range from decent salt-of-the-earth types to despicable and repulsive this-close-to being criminals. the good ones will take the fall when gentiles have had enough and go after all of them, like that austrian chancellor.

        look at the wall street debacle, largely caused by jews ( way disproportionally employed there) through their greed and irresponsibility. the media downplays it of course, but who are you gonna believe, them or your lyin’ eyes?

        our jewish friends sometimes fret _to us_ their fear of rising antisemitism (imagine what they say among themselves). up until now i dismissed it as ridiculous paranoia. not any more, let me tell you.

        all that’s between them and civil uprising is another financial meltdown which hurts gentiles badly while most jews escape the worst of it. thank god bush was unable to hand over soc sec to wall street. can you imagine if they coudln’t restrain themselves from abusing that trust.

        jews rightly have the reputation as being very smart, but you have to wonder how forward thinking they are. don’t they understand the potential for blowback? their rabbis seem powerless to affect their behavior, except for the hasidim i lived among in brooklyn. even there, the focus was on the prosperity of the community, not moral values like ‘leave ’em breathing’ if they insisted on exploiting gentiles.

        one of my sons joined the navy (due to deteriorating job market from crash 4 years ago caused largely by you know who) and will be going to nuclear school to learn to tend the reactors on a carrier. there’s a good chance he’ll wind up in the persian gulf. if israel does something massively stupid, our fleet there will be a sitting duck for iranian missiles. the generals know this, having wargamed the situation and so want nothing to do with a war. maybe the jews through their israeli brethren will start ww3 and americans will die to defend israel rather than their own country.

        enough from me. i used to think anti-semitism was unclassy. but lately reading eloquent defenses of it from people like uh, i’m thinking they have a case.

        Like


      • newyorker

        You kidding, uh speaks the truth since day 1.
        My anti-semitism is a little bit different. I can understand jews’ economic predation and cynicism, they’re not alone in it and I’m pro free market. Their abuse makes me want to regulate them, but not to hate them.
        I’m more concerned with jews’ promotion of decadence. In Germany and Europe, they used to be vilified because they portrayed too much female adultery in theater. Now, they’re promoting adultery, miscegenation, anti-white open border BS with hollywood crap, porn and leftist mainstream media.

        Instead of killing jews though, I would ban them from any kind of media and regulate the shit out of their financial activity.

        Like


      • “I’ve sure there are hundreds of inventions by “good” Jews that have helped mankind.
        What’s your point?
        Nobody ever said they were all bad people… just the ones who act as puppetmasters in politics and the media.“

        In all fairness, it’s because people in these fields tend to tilt left, Jews and non-Jews alike. Why only blame the Jews? It’s all kinds of liberals that permeate western culture who are to blame. And these liberals come in all shapes and sizes, not just Jewish.

        Like


      • “I’m more concerned with jews’ promotion of decadence. In Germany and Europe, they used to be vilified because they portrayed too much female adultery in theater. Now, they’re promoting adultery, miscegenation, anti-white open border BS with hollywood crap, porn and leftist mainstream media.
        Instead of killing jews though, I would ban them from any kind of media and regulate the shit out of their financial activity.”

        As if in Hollywood, media, and finance there are only Jews and no other types of people. LOL! No Irish or Italians or Anglos anywhere in sight of HW, media, and finance. It’s absurd.

        Most of you here are filled with anger and rightfully so, but you don’t know who to direct it at. Therefore, you do like what other predecessors thinking like you did throughout history, namely find a scapegoat. And who is the easiest scapegoat in history? The Jews. Why because they seem like smarter and richer, so you conclude they must have stolen it all. Your mindset is not better than occupy wall street hating rich people, or low-IQ blacks believing the white man did it at their expense. Honestly, let’s exercise some common sense.

        Like


      • As usual, Pierce sums it up best.

        Like


      • That’s a dodge and we all know it. One should be able to discuss something straight-up…looking for excuses isn’t what a man does when presented with an opposing view.

        Like


      • If treating media-approved hacks as if their tripe is valid discussion material is being a man, then stop the world, I need to get off.

        A man doesn’t waste time playing by the enemy’s rules… he ignores and mocks them in turn, as the occasion demands.

        Like


      • Fine, but if you want to debunk something you have to do it rationally, dismissing opposing views out of hand is what I see every feminist do once it’s clear they’ve lost the plot. If you want to ignore and mock then do that, but that’s not what I’m reading from your posts.

        Like


      • If you can’t see the mocking in my posts, then I’ve failed in my wit… or you’re projecting more onto my attitude than you realize.

        I’m closer to the ‘grumpy old man’ stage of life than the idealist dragon slayer, so my impatience with the less experienced “well-meaning SWPLs” around here is reflected by the refusal to ‘discuss rationally’ that which I know they will not be swayed by… been there/done that, time’s running out, so exchange a few volleys for one’s own amusement.

        In short, getting too old for fools’ errands.

        Like


      • Jason, I left you another reply that is not showing on the board. I didn’t mean to be rude to you, and my comment about your wife was more tongue n’ cheek. I hope it will post shortly.

        You got to understand the economy and the free-market place to understand that a business has survival mechanism just as a person has. That’s what juvenile liberals don’t understand at the RollingStones.

        Regarding cheating on your wife, don’t you dare listen to these boys. It sounds like you’re happy having her in your life, so don’t ruin it just for the sake of being called an “Alpha.” Since when is cheating on your wife an Alpha trait?

        Like


      • Thank you. These guys shove, so I shove back.

        I do understand the free marketplace, and it isn’t very free, actually. The specific point is that Bain Capital isn’t inspiring. The president of a private equity firm is not who we should vote into the highest office of the land, as our ceremonial and budgetary leader.

        And no cheating here.

        Like


      • Actually, you don’t shove back…

        You merely pick yourself up from the floor, dust yourself off, and refuse to learn from the previous shoving, as your ass hits the pavement yet again.

        Like


      • You’ll get an honorary gold star in Jew heaven, you will.

        Like


      • Jason, you dont shit about private equity. Get a job in one, even if it means in the filing room, and learn whereof you speak.

        Like


      • I think you should consider your civil rights and how they have been curtailed since women started voting. Don’t you realize you are already a second class citizen? Your word has less weight in a court of law than does a woman’s. You have zero paternity rights not approved by a woman. You have a lower legal right to any job than a woman. That makes me burn with anger when I ponder it. As idealistic as you are, it should have the same effect on you.

        Like


      • Jesus, I’m not even American and reading this makes me sick. What a fucking piss-ant.

        Like


      • Obama will win. No need to worry about it.

        Like


      • Sorry I meant to answer Jason, not you.

        Like


      • “I’m choosing the present and future state of my pocketbook over my race, buddy.”

        Genetic interest>financial interest

        Financial interest is only important in as much as it serves your genetic interest.

        What point is resources to an organism when that organism is dead?

        Like


      • “I’m choosing the present and future state of my pocketbook over my race, buddy”

        Also, isn’t it ironic that those who most rail against capitalism are also those most willing to sell out their own for a buck?

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 1:04 am Mr. Pointyface

        You murderous, racist wingnuts, who astoundingly also lay claim to being Christians are not “my own.”

        I see now how the Nazis did it, there must be a significant minority of people who, feeling inferior, try to grasp onto the only thing that connects them to greatness– their white race, and when given the opportunity, will willingly murder, and torture millions of helpless, harmless people. How charming.

        Like


      • Defend white people or yourself as a white man with discrete interests: naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

        I see now how the Jews did it; there must be a significant minority of people who, feeling vulnerable, grasped onto the only things that connect them to power- usury and news outlets, and when given the opportunity, willingly murder and torture millions of helpless, harmless people (Holodomor, Bela Kuhn govt, commitment to abortion). How charming.

        Like


      • Uh, if you are the best of the defenders of whoever you think are your people, they are doomed.

        Like


      • Then again, you also urged me to cheat on my wife in a previous comment a while back, so you’re persona non grata here.

        I doubt that, but I am not surprised you misread my advice given the crude comprehension skills evident by your credulous politics.

        Taibbi is a jagoff provocateur who writes prolix conspirazoid screeds for maleducated SWPL who think they’re much smarter than they are. If he were on the right, he’d have been written off as the nutcase he is. But since he confirms crypto-Marxian theories of a rapacious capital class, fools like you take him at face value. There is so much more to political fundamentals than the rewarmed, sub-Hegelian, EZ-Bake confections you received for your “social studies” core credit as an undergrad. But you wouldn’t know it. You’re too busy reading Rolling Fucking Stone for the “inside” “scoop.”

        Matt

        Like


      • “… a jagoff provocateur who writes prolix conspirazoid screeds for maleducated SWPL …”

        Change that last word to “wingnut” and you’re looking in a mirror, buddy.

        Like


      • “crypto-Marxian theories of a rapacious capital class”

        Someone is ignoring forty years of economic history here. The haves have more, and the have-nots have less … and the spread has been widening for longer than I’ve been alive.

        Better study up. Or you can just stick with generalizing and name-calling.

        Seriously — use a number once in every thousand bloviating words. Readers like me appreciate it.

        Like


      • Have nots today live better than I did as a have in my youth.

        Like


      • Matt Taibbi is nothing but a juvenile liberal idiot hack. Anything he writes holds no interest except to some idiots who follow him.

        The guy is mired in controversy and entitled behavior.

        Honestly, what serious journalist behaves like this. BTW, he’s not Jewish. Just a case in point, since all of you think it’s the Jewish journalists spreading liberalism.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Taibbi

        • In March 2001, as editor of the magazine The eXile, Taibbi burst into the office of New York Times Moscow bureau chief Michael Wines and threw a cream pie spiked with horse semen into his face, after Taibbi’s magazine had awarded Wines the title of “worst journalist” in Russia.

        • In March 2005 Taibbi’s satirical essay, “The 52 Funniest Things About the Upcoming Death of the Pope” published in the New York Press was denounced by Hillary Clinton, Michael Bloomberg, Matt Drudge, Abe Foxman, and Anthony Weiner. The editor who approved the column lost his job. Taibbi defended the piece as an “off-the-cuff burlesque of truly tasteless jokes” written to give his readers a break from a long run of “fulminating political essays” of his. Taibbi also said he was surprised at the vehement reactions to what he wrote “in the waning hours of a Vicodin haze.”

        • Journalist James Verini, while interviewing Taibbi in a Manhattan restaurant for Vanity Fair, said Taibbi cursed and threw a coffee at him, and accosted him as he tried to get away, all in response to Verini’s volunteered opinion that Taibbi’s book, The Exile: Sex, Drugs, and Libel in the New Russia, was “redundant and discursive.” Taibbi later said the incident was “an aberration from how I’ve behaved in the last six or seven years.”

        Like


      • “he’s got a National Magazine Award”

        I was about to read the article until you mentioned that. There’s no quicker disqualification for being taken seriously than the approval of other guild members.

        What’s next, praise for Walter Duranty because he’s got a Pulitzer, and the NYT won’t give it back?

        Then I read this:

        http://althouse.blogspot.jp/2012/07/if-they-want-more-stuff-from-government.html

        The reason O didn’t drop that in the debate is that he knows normal people agree with Romney, and he was speaking to normal people for once in his life.

        The fevered Taibbi brain as revealed by that comment, plus his participation in Journolist 2.0, means that anything he writes is tainted and not worth the time it takes to read.

        Like


      • Excellent.

        The kid-who-loves-to-type touts the Rolling Stone hack and finds new ways to get hung out to dry.

        A rented mule never got beat this bad.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 12:51 am Mr. Pointyface

        No Jason, DON’T TALK ABOUT OBJECTIVE PHYSICAL REALITY, rely on abstract BS like “liberal” which means, in operational, visually observable terms…. um.. well it means something. I’ve explained twice what reification was was but I don’t think it’s in the wingnut dictionary.

        There forlorn guys that are always race bashing– here’s a question for you heroic– conservatives?

        OK, there’s a stadium filled with 100, 000 African-Americans. That’s all you know. Some assortment.

        You have a chance to prove your “race loyalty” and fail to report a checmical bomb that’s going to kill all those 100, 000 people.

        DO you call the bomb squad? I can hear the tap dancing starting already.

        Are you genocidal maniacs or not?

        Stand up for the Fuhrer if you are!! All the bond girls will be SO impressed by your heroism, I’m sure.

        Like


      • Jason’s sock puppet, back to share in his alter-ego’s ass-whuppin’.

        Pretty pathetic.

        Like


      • Better question for you, with your premise:

        OK, there’s a stadium filled with 100, 000 African-Americans. That’s all you know. Some assortment.

        You’re a white parent of two white daughters, and they have to go to the bathroom.

        You have a chance to prove your race disloyalty and fail to send them off with an escort, for to do so would imply fear that the African-Americans would sexually abuse them.

        DO you send them to the bathroom alone? I can hear the psk-psk‘s and daaaayyum baby‘s already.

        Are you a anti-white genocidal maniac or not?

        Stand up for the Jews if you are!! All the niggers will be SO unimpressed by your self-hating heroism, I’m sure.

        PS – In case you’re truly dim, I’ve just described the scene inside New Orleans’ Superdome post-Katrina.

        Like


      • If it makes you happy, I’d call the bomb squad and do it forthwith.

        Like


      • No, I wouldn’t call anyone.
        But that’s too good to be true.

        Like


      • Let me clarify.
        If it was in Africa, I would definitely help those poor animals.
        But in the US? No way, brah.

        Like


      • Kick ass.

        Like


      • And you attempt to defend a political entity that has so pathetically led us to this sad state of affairs. If you really think Romney offers something quantitatively different from Obama, then you’re the one wearing distortion filters. Of course, you shouldn’t neglect to mention that white men were the ones who ceded to feminism with a smile on their faces. Meanwhile, the non-whites you deride are the ones who still have a semblance of a society left, so let’s use reason next time instead of emotional appeals.

        Like


    • I keep seeing this “kerry beat Bush in the debate” thing, and its just pure bullshit. Nobody liked Kerry, not even democrats, and he looked like a stiff rhetoric machine in the debates, and so was disposed of accordingly by the electorate. Thats not to say Bush “won” those debates. 2004 was the epitome of douche vs. turd sandwich.

      Like


      • Yeah, well, current truth requires this to be true so that they have a scenario to argue that Obama’s doing ok. Welcome to the memory hole.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 12:58 am Mr. Pointyface

        People are tired of the hate machine, ever since Your fearless leader got 8 million Germans killed with this exact same insanity– hating women, hating non-whites, or Jews….instead of taking pride in a detail like skin color, why not take pride in , like, you cured cancer or something?

        Or why not take pride in some other absurdly irrelevant characteristic, like having a nose over 3.2 inches long? So sad to try to take credit for what white men have done when YOU you didn’t do it.

        Do something positive yourselves. As Jesus the great Schizophrenic humanist said, “You shall know them by their fruits.”

        Look at the fruit of Hitler’s racism, or Stalins absolutism, or abstract absolutism of any kind.

        And look at what you foster with your race hatred yourselves.

        Like


      • So sad to try to take credit for what white men have done when YOU you didn’t do it.

        Say it loud… “I’M BLACK AND PROUD!”

        It’s pretty pathetic to tell whites not to be proud of their ancestors’ accomplishments over the very medium they created that enable you to do so.

        Especially given the past three generations of “Black Is Beautiful” and “Black History Month” agitprop that is given a pass.

        Take a hike, buttboy.

        Like


      • I take it you never heard Fred Hampton say “white power to white people”, because he did say that. Don’t try to confuse whimpering white liberal campus guilt with everyone you disagree with because it’s not that simple.

        I’m plenty proud of my ancestors’ accomplishments, but that pride and that self-assurance doesn’t negate the accomplishments of other peoples and other nations. My ancestors’ history teaches me that it is wise and noble to seek just peace over irrational hatred, that it is the mark of the civilized to be willing to forge friendship across borders.

        In contrast, the insecure response is one of fearful rejection, and I will not be party to that: pride is one thing, but naivete is another.

        Like


      • Fighting back is the new insecurity, eh? And since when is it irrational to hate your enemies in general, and those who challenge you (as the snark-pirates here) personally?

        Please… the Buddha already beat you to your stance, and God bless you both… but don’t deign to call righteous anger ‘insecurity’, nor the hatred of those who hate one’s own folk ‘irrational’.

        Like


      • Perceiving enemies where there needn’t be any is a product of insecurity, and it is certainly irrational. I ask you: who is your enemy? One must be precise here, mind.

        Now, there is hatred of whites, but it’s mostly self-hatred held by whites themselves…even Fred Hampton had no bone to pick with white people as I’ve shown (especially when he said “white power to white people”), and you could say the same of Steve Biko and many other non-white leaders. A non-white ruled as the emperor of Rome and arguably saved it from collapse. So no, your anger is not righteous, it is being sent in the wrong directions. I have no problem with self-defense, and on the contrary I applaud it, but blaming non-whites for problems common throughout humanity isn’t self-defense, it’s denial, for the world is far more complicated than that.

        Like


      • You too are guilty of race-hatred: of whites.

        Now move along. We aren’t listening to Sunday sermons anymore.

        Like


    • @Jason

      Since when did American Capitalism go from it built our country to hang them for building something for themselves?

      Equity firm? Dismantled worthless companies? So the hell what? I would be that your family history is littered with people who protested the the poor musket maker when cased bullets came along, automobiles since it replaced the horse & buggy, the poor makers of vacume tubes when those evil microchip people started up their factories?

      Get used to it, if a company is dismantled.. there’s a reason.

      Like


      • One, basic economics says a country should export more than it imports, and our modern U.S. capitalism has stopped doing so. Romney is the perfect example of this phenomenon: he builds nothing.

        Two, Romney has invested most of his money outside of the US. He needs a passport to go visit his bank accounts.

        He’s not an inspiring American. He doesn’t give a shit about this country. He gives a shit about making money wherever it can be made. The millions of poor idiots who are duped into voting for him will, as usual, pay for it.

        But thanks for the civil comment.

        Like


      • So maybe it’s a good idea to stop all money transfers abroad. And also forbid issuing passports.
        You are a dummy. And that’s being civil.

        Like


      • Make a real argument, and I’ll listen to you. That’s being civil too.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 1:32 am gunslingergregi

        that is kind of happening would be much much harder for the shawshank redemption with dollars and retiring in another country today.
        in indo they only took certain new hundreds
        so if you had the money sitting bundled up you couldn’t even trade it in

        Like


      • “He’s not an inspiring American. He doesn’t give a shit about this country. He gives a shit about making money wherever it can be made.”

        “I’m choosing the present and future state of my pocketbook over my race, buddy.”

        — Jason, anti-white punk

        Like


      • “He’s not an inspiring American. He doesn’t give a shit about this country. He gives a shit about making money wherever it can be made. The millions of poor idiots who are duped into voting for him will, as usual, pay for it.”

        Jason, you’re unfairly accusing Romney because of the liberal stuff you read in the media. I have an idea for you, why don’t you do some reading on what the conservatives have to say about him and then re-judge him. It’s not fair you listening to only one side. You need to read some conservative bloggers. Besides, he isn’t all that conservative. He is lacking in many areas, but he is better than Obama any day. Obama will turn you into a salve of the state. All your earnings will go to support the state’s programs for minorities, which Obama luuuuves to champion. If that’s alright with you, so be it.

        Besides, since when is making money an evil thing? Economic freedom is real freedom. You should aspire for it yourself. People shouldn’t envy rich people; they should try to emulate them, better yet surpass them. May I ask what you do for a living? You don’t have to answer me, if it’s too much prying for you. I am just curious why so much anti-business sentiments.

        Like


      • He works in education.
        Big surprise, huh?

        Like


      • No libtard left behind.

        Like


      • That explains it – he works for the State and he is part of a union. No brainer there.

        But instead of our wrath, he needs our educating. He’s been brainwashed like 98% of America.

        Like


      • “You bomb Mecca and Medina and you will get an unending war with more than 50 armies, and we barely won the Iraq war. Saddam had at least 3 occasions to slaughter our infantry during the invasion but we made it because of sheer luck.”

        Bull fucking shit! Now you’re talking just like those liberal scaredy-cats who see only defeat, gloom and doom for the US because ‘we’re not strong enough and not smart enough’ blah, blah, blah…… Give me and yourself a break. For an Alpha male, you speak like a defeatist.

        You don’t understand the mindset of Muslims or the Arab world. The only things they respond to are power and strength. In other words, they respect and fear you only if they think you are stronger and not afraid to use your strength against them. Otherwise, they’ll walk all over you. In other words, they’ll try to convert you, and if that doesn’t work their men will marry or rape your women, and if that doesn’t work they’ll kill you. So either you’ll submit to Islam, or you’re marked for death. Therefore, there is no other way but to fight them. They view disengagement or kindness as weakness. BTW, how many Muslim women do you know marry men of other religions? It’s almost unheard of. They don’t want anyone leaving the religion. They want backward Muslim men bringing stupid white chicks into it.

        Now Mecca and Medina I used only as an example to say that until a US president takes extreme measures against Islam, this war will not end. Therefore, I don’t want to hear idiots rejoice about how we got Bin Laden and now it means we won the war on terror. Islam has a looooooong memory. Hell, Muslims are still hateful and resentful about perceived injustices from the Crusades, which BTW Islam started, not Christianity. If they thought we’re going to bomb Mecca, trust me this war would end overnight. If they thought we’re going to carpet bomb to oblivion one of their capitals, this war would end tomorrow. If they thought we’re going to seize their oil, they’d be bending over backwards. No, instead we buy oil from them and make them richer so they can use their wealth to bring about our doom. Or we listen to weak-minded liberal idiots who think a stupid YouTube video should be banned to make Muslims happy, and curtailing our rights in air travel and banking is the way to keep us safe. Or we hear scaredy-cats defeats like you blaming America and telling us there is no way out but disengagement or appeasement.

        “striving to destroy imaginary enemies outside and failing to recognize that the real enemy is inside.”

        You’re blind as blind is if you think Islam is an imaginary enemy. Look at what they have done to Europe, and without any European “war mongering neo-con cunts”, as you call them. They don’t need an excuse to hate any Westerner. Our very existence displeases them to no end. In their twisted head, the whole planet should bow to Allah (God) through Islam, adopt Sharia law, and accept Mohamed as The Profit, or they’ll wage war and kill everyone. You don’t understand their mindset; they rather suffer than let you be; they rather blow up themselves than let you be. That’s a crewed-up ideology that most Westerns don’t understand. We have the concept of win win, and everyone is happy. To them if you are winning, it means they are losing. No compromises.

        “This country is fucked because of lefties who want to spend trillions on social welfare for parasites and religious zealots who want to destroy everything that hurts their feelings.
        Grow the fuck up.”

        First, I’m not a religious zealot, even though I believe that taking Biblical concepts like good and evil out of education wasn’t a good thing and contributed a lot to our social ills.

        Second, by the sound of your rants, YOU need to grow up.

        Maybe I’m a woman, considered unintelligent to you. That’s OK, I take no offense, but honestly, I expected better thinking-process form you.

        On the leftist, I’ll agree with you 100%. And I’ll also agree with you on this point, “If we weren’t pussies, Islam wouldn’t even be heard. They are simply filling a void.“ True, if we weren’t pussies. But honestly, don’t you think Islam sense the weakness of the West resulting from the liberal onslaught and the isolationists mindset, and that’s why it’s waging war on us on all fronts – through terror and through immigration aimed at converting us? That’s why we have to show strength. Appeasement or disengagement will not thwart Islam.

        Third, I’m not a war-mongering neo-con cunt. What I am is a realist. I am not simple minded, thinking that just by leaving Muslims alone they’ll leave us be. They always looked for excuses to start wars with the West. In fact, why do you think the crusades started? There was no America “meddling” then, no Israel “subjugating Palestinians” (hell no Palestinians even existed), Saudi Arabia didn’t exist, no one knew anything about oil, no Western culture “seeping” into theirs – none of the excuses they now use as pretexts and yet they found a reason. It’s the same underlining reason that no one wants to admit is the culprit today, namely it’s their religion. It instructs them to destroy the infidel, even if they are to be killed themselves in the process. They also want the return of the Caliphate, which declined since the 17th century. They never got over it, and in the 20th century they found various ploys to start conflicts with the West to restore their honor, which they feel was destroyed when the caliphate declined. Just look at an atlas, how many conflicts are there raging, as we speak, all over the globe involving Muslims? Dozens upon dozens. It’s time for you to reconsider some of the stuff you said to me, especially about the imaginary enemy. And no need to attack me; we can debate like adults. Too much anger directed at me, but too afraid to direct it at Liberals, Leftist, and enemies?

        Here is some reading for you by Bernard Lewis. He has many books on Islam, which he has been writing since the 1940’s. This is a short article based on his 2002 book “What Went Wrong?: Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response” which he wrote for the New Yorker, a liberal publication; not neo-con.
        http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2002/01/lewis.htm

        Also this about Londonistan. See what’s going on in the UK.
        If we don’t think Islam is posing a threat to America, we’ll have New Yorkistan soon.
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Londonistan:_How_Britain_is_Creating_a_Terror_State_Within

        Like


      • NiteLily, above I made the comment that I’m choosing my [WALLET] over my race. Yes, capitalism is good, when regulated.

        But you’re falling prey to a false dichotomy. A person doesn’t have to be either pro or con business; he can hope for free markets with significant regulations that avert giant meltdowns.

        Romney comes out of high finance. As president, he would continue to benefit his friends, high financiers. And high finance is rigged against the average American. Therefore, don’t vote Romney.

        I do read conservative stuff too. But I disagree strongly with much of it.

        Like


      • Too late.

        Like


      • I am definitely NOT a supporter of Romney. But I’m a bit confused by your comments. Are you FOR Obama? If so, that’s just whack. What about stepping out the the two party system, and being FOR the people?

        Like


      • If supporting a guy who personally fought for and saved 1 million jobs in the General Motors supply chain — at a net profit to taxpayers — is whack, then I’m whacked.

        If supporting a guy who actually killed our biggest enemy — when the previous president had admitted he didn’t even care about finding him any more — is whack, then I’m whacked.

        bin Laden is dead, GM is alive. It’s a great bumper sticker, and it’s true.

        Those are facts.

        Like


      • Thank you for clarifying. You’re whacked. Enjoy your bumper sticker.

        Like


      • Jason, are you claiming that the General Motors bailout was a net profit to taxpayers?

        That is simply false.

        Like


      • OK so GM is alive and Solyndra is dead along with many other Obama programs. One success doesn’t a president make.

        “The Obama administration is famous for its crony capitalism. It’s famous for wasting money on disastrous investments like Solyndra to pay off its political allies. It now appears, however, that they go a step further: they put public funds in bad investment loans, then double down on their bad loans with free cash grants.”

        http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/09/10/angus-king-solyndra-Obama-Department-of-Energy

        Like


      • Oh and don’t be fooled about killing our “number one” enemy.

        1. First, Bush put the process of this in motions, not any of the liberals that fought him every step of the way, and now are unashamedly taking all the glory for it. Killing Bin Laden is no accomplishment, especially since you’re ripping the fruit of you predecessor

        2. Second, killing one Bin Laden doesn’t even put a dent in the problem of radical Islam. They have millions of Bin Ladens, don’t you understand that? Even if all of them are not going to take arms against us, 95% of them are sympathizers; they give aid and comfort to their brethren. So what if we killed one cave dweller, there are many waiting in the wings, don’t be foolish. If he bombed Mecca and Medina and put an end to Islam’s aspiration of world domination once and for all, then he can take credit. As it stands, he deserves nil.

        3. Third, this president is such a traitor, not even a month after the Bin Laden operation, we lost all of the men that killed him. Gee, what a coincidence! The Obama white house felt so bad about killing a beloved Muslim, it sent the Taliban exact info on where to find our men. Everyone who participated in the raid is now dead save a couple who weren’t on that chopper. If that doesn’t boil your blood, I don’t know what does. I can’t believe people think Bin Laden’s raid is proof Obama is tough on terrorism. He is tough on imaginary US Imperialism. Muslim’s aspirations are just the answer for his perceived US Colonialism.

        Like I said, two half-ass accomplishments are not a president make.

        Like


      • You bomb Mecca and Medina and you will get an unending war with more than 50 armies, and we barely won the Iraq war. Saddam had at least 3 occasions to slaughter our infantry during the invasion but we made it because of sheer luck.

        This anti-islam faggotry needs to stop. If we weren’t pussies, Islam wouldn’t even be heard. They are simply filling a void. And islam won’t die in the arab world. It’s too strong a conservative to let go. And it’s in their best interest I might add.

        And Nitelily you are another war-mongering neo-con cunt. One of the problems of this country are those of your ilk, striving to destroy imaginary enemies outside and failing to recognize that the real enemy is inside.

        This country is fucked because of lefties who want to spend trillions on social welfare for parasites and religious zealots who want to destroy everything that hurts their feelings.

        Grow the fuck up.

        Like


      • Anon

        And Nitelily you are another war-mongering neo-con cunt.

        Nitelily is a guy.

        Like


      • Thwack

        No, she’s not and your ilk are part of the problem too.

        Like


      • Need to know time:

        1) Bin Laden died of acute renal failure in December 2001, in the Tora Bora Mountains.
        2) The raid conducted in Abbottabad was designed to capture someone else.
        3) One of the three helicopters involved in the mission was shot down within the compound, killing the members of the Seal team onboard. Wreckage was recovered, and photos of it were published in Pakistani newspapers.
        4) The deceased members of said Seal Team were falsely reported KIA in Afghanistan a week later.

        Osama Bin Laden aka Tim Osman is one giant “Wag the Dog” psy-op. Always has been.

        Like


      • To save those jobs he also screwed over all of the existing shareholders in the bankruptcy process. Most of them were retirees and widows. They got pennies on the dollar while Obama handed GM ownership to the UAW by fiat, running roughshod over all of the basic principles of bankruptcy law. Why doesn’t anyone tell their story to tug at the heartstrings?

        Like


      • Basic economics say exactly nothing about how much a “country” should import and export. Economics deal with acting entities. That’d be individual people, possibly aggregations like firms and organizations. “Countries” does not factor in to it until you start talking about political economy.

        What Bain supposedly did, was cheaply take over control of enterprises that spent more resources making what they made, than they could sell the end product for. Meaning, destroying value. Then the Bain boys reorganized how that enterprise worked, so that they now spent less than the could sell it for; aka being profitable. They then sold this newly profitable enterprise with a profit.

        At least that’s the PR story PE likes to tell. And, were we still living in a gold standard, close to zero inflation economy with no intervention to prop up markets and distort interest rates, it wold have been a true story, assuming Mittens & Co. could still make money of their activity of choice. The reality though, is that whether Bain successfully restructured anything was largely irrelevant to their financial performance, which, like almost all other banks and financials over the past 4 decades, have derived the vast, vast majority of gains from simply having cheap early access to newly printed money. Ensuring their owners and partners have gotten rich whether they actually created or destroyed value. Maybe they did create value, maybe they didn’t. It’s impossible to tell, since whatever they may have created is so completely dwarfed by the largess they have receive from simple inflation as to be lost in roundoff.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 10:58 pm Hugh G. Rection

        If basic economics said that, basic economics doesn’t make good sense, or at least your economics. What you wanna do as a country is hand out your paper money in exchange for real goods, like iphones, or BMWs. Just look at China. They transferred tons and tons of valuable goods over to you guys in exchange for money that half the guys on here consider phony, worthless paper. Who gets the better end of that deal?

        Like


      • Gotta agree here. People are taking Romney’s side just because he isn’t Obama, but he’s just as much a problem to the national interest as Obama is. I’d say he’s worse, since he’d gladly hammer in the final nail in America’s coffin by waging war with Iran, while at least Obama doesn’t seem to bend over for all demands from the mossad.

        There will be no betterment until people realize that the rigged political system cannot solve our problems.

        Like


      • Obama is clueless and a rank amateur. You people seem to never see all the corruption that is created by a huge Progressive feedback loop of patronage to special interests. All of the focues is on finance. This octopus extends to all sectors of the economy and culture. Besides, why does Wall Street donate most of its money to the Democrats when its the Republians who are supposed to be their friends?

        Like


      • “Besides, why does Wall Street donate most of its money to the Democrats when its the Republians who are supposed to be their friends?”

        Excellent point. It’s quite telling isn’t it?

        Anyone with eyes to see can tell that it’s because of the tendency of Democrats to be more susceptible to crony capitalism, and their willingness to vote on the floor based on the needs of special-interest group. The democrats will do anything for money, even sell their own country. Didn’t Clinton sell America’s secrets to the Saudis for around 100 Million? Obama keeps talking about the evils of special-interest groups, but he’s nothing but a hypocrite. He has been in bed with the special-interest groups since he was a state senator in Chicago.

        Any business owner knows that if he can get in with the Democrats, he’ll be set. That’s why almost every single industry donates more to Democrats than Republicans, even though it’s supposedly the Republicans who are more friendly to business. This propensity is most obvious in the banking industry.

        And BTW, I don’t consider these Wall Street Republican real conservatives. Many of them support gay marriage and feminist agendas. I don’t consider someone a conservative if he isn’t socially conservative first. Once one is socially conservative, from there everything else falls into place.

        Like


      • Yep, very true, a corporate candidate is a corporate candidate….IMO, both Obama and Romney are equally that so it’s no use trying to decide between the two. Anyway, just because the Wall St Republicans wrap themselves in the flag doesn’t mean they care about the country, else they’d remember that Washington was firmly against the idea of a standing army instead of spending unholy amounts of money sending kids to kill and die wherever resources happen to be.

        Like


    • Read or listen to milton friedman or any one of the stalwart proponents of the free market. Listen to what they, not to what the leftie media tells you to think about them.
      You sound wildly illiterate ranting against “vampires”.

      Like


      • I’m very familiar with Milton Friedman and the Chicago Boys. I know exactly what they did in Chile — they left it with forty years of economic turmoil and no significant improvement in the state of their state.

        Speaking of wildly illiterate, learn how to capitalize.

        Like


      • “Economic turmoil” must be the leftie equivalent of a sustained economic growth, averaging between 3 and 5% over decades. “No significant improvement” must mean being far ahead of the other neighbour latin countries:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_Chile

        As I said, you are only familiar with what lefties tell you to think.
        I still have doubts about your literacy. Being able to capitalize won’t help you when you can’t deal with facts.
        Nice try though.

        Like


      • Did you really read that article? It states that increases in child welfare and decreases in infant mortality are NOT attributable to free market Friedman thinking — but instead to improvements in Chile’s PUBLIC programs.

        It also states: “The most conspicuous feature of the post 1973 period is that of considerable instability…no firm and consistent upward trend (to say the least).”

        I’m in doubt as to YOUR literacy at this point.

        Like


      • Cherry-picking, sentimentalism and failing to see the big picture.
        Check your hormones, mate. I’m starting to have doubts about your gender too.

        Like


      • He did say “pocketbook” above. I don’t know any kind of man who would use that term, and I don’t get the sense that he’s in drag.

        Think we have ourselves a crypto-bitch, gentlemen. Jew perhaps. College grad Jewesses are known for this strident attitudinizing full of dodges and straw men.

        Poor thing. Nothing at home to nurse but her own miserable self-righteousness.

        Like


      • That would explain quite a bit… I’ve long suspected his/her Jewishness, contrary to the denials.

        Like


      • Oh noes! We’re so sensitive to the word “pocketbook”! To soothe your aching butthurt, here it is: MY WALLET.

        Which sits on the back of my all-white-meat, raised-Catholic, 210-lb, former athlete ass.

        God I love your conspiracy theories. You seriously can’t conceive of one of your own having a different worldview.

        Like


      • On a side note: We happen to be the same exact size… got any ol’ clothes you’re looking to get rid of… I haven’t upgraded my wardrobe in years, and you sound SWPL chic.

        Like


      • Jason,

        You are not my own, whatever you are. Wouldn’t hesitate to end you and any of your ilk.

        Like


      • “Wouldn’t hesitate to end you and any of your ilk.”

        Death threat has been duly noted.

        Like


      • I’m sure you’d be able to find some good things about Cuba, too. But 99% of people out there who know anything about Cuba will tell you it’s a shithole.

        Like


      • This is all leftist propaganda you spew against Milton Friedman. Man, you really need to read some other stuff.

        Like


      • “I’m very familiar with Milton Friedman and the Chicago Boys. I know exactly what they did in Chile”

        The only Chicago boys you need to worry about is Obama and his group of hoodlums from Chicago destroying America.

        Like


      • Are you telling him to listen to a JEW?
        Didn’t you get the memo?

        Like


      • I have a lot of grievances against jews. But I respect those who don’t let their jewishness get in the way. It includes among others friedman, and the main writer of this blog.

        Like


      • “Are you telling him to listen to a JEW?
        Didn’t you get the memo?”

        LMAO!!! Apparently, there are some Jews these guys like over here, so not all of them are the devil incarnate after all.

        Uh and Greg should pay attention.

        Like


      • And NiteLily should quit shooting off her mouth about things she doesn’t understand… in this very thread, I myself said that the only Jews I have a problem with are the puppetmasters of the media and political influence.

        By any chance, are you a Jewess? You certainly yiddle enough.

        Like


      • You yourself quoted that very comment of mine in one of your prior posts… although I can see how your scattershot mind would lose track in the reams of said priors.

        Like


      • I understand plenty. But unlike you and most of your buddies, I don’t mindlessly follow and jump on the bandwagon.

        Correction, “the puppetmasters of the media and political influence,” are not only Jewish. By singling out the Jews, we’re not addressing the problem of liberalism, which is an even a bigger problem in Europe, and there the Jews are hardly found in the media and politics. Hence, liberalism is not only the domain of Jews.

        No, but I have many Jewish friends, and I know that not all of them are liberals or support liberalism. And Israeli Jews hate liberalism. They recently had a shift from liberalism back to old-fashion conservative values in Israel. Maybe that can influence Jews in America to return to their original roots of conservatism.

        Like


      • “You yourself quoted that very comment of mine in one of your prior posts… ”

        You’re missing the point, just because I criticized you about Hitler it doesn’t mean I don’t like your comments or agree with you on many other things. I do. I just found this nostalgia for a power-hungry demagogue killer a bit weird, if not totally misguided. Especially, more so since I like your Biblical stances.

        Like


      • I understand plenty. But unlike you and most of your buddies, I don’t mindlessly follow and jump on the bandwagon.

        There have been some pretty good comments on this board explaining very MINDFULLY the reasons for what you dismiss as “mindless” antisemitism.

        The only mindless spiel I’m reading here in this thread is your insipid NAJALT toeing of the neocon party line.

        When individuals of Jewish persuasion are the dominant force of a particular field, and more important, use said field to further the agendas of their own kind, to the detriment of their host populations, then they deserve to be called out as such… regardless of whether the occasional gentile can also be found in said field.

        Because invariably said gentile will ONLY be allowed a part if he toes the party line or shows himself to be a useful idiot in providing some sort of smokescreen of alleged “opposition”…allowed to rail on in a Limbaughesque of Savagerian manner, but never allowed to say the whole truth about The Chosen or any of their pet projects and philosophies.

        Like


      • Keep yapping, because with every one of your rants you sound more anti-Semitic, which in turn makes you sound more of a sore loser. Really…..now if I were you, I wouldn’t let everyone know that I have nothing going for me and that’s why I am sooooooo angry with the Jews.

        I can figure out people pretty well just from one or two conversations. I wasn’t mistaken about you. I had you pegged quickly, which is why you keep lashing out at me.

        Statements like this one make you sound so jealous:

        “When individuals of Jewish persuasion are the dominant force of a particular field, and more important, use said field to further the agendas of their own kind, to the detriment of their host populations, then they deserve to be called out as such… regardless of whether the occasional gentile can also be found in said field.”

        OK let’s dissect this. Jews are .001% of the population, therefore, how are they going to dominate anything? Please use your brain, or do you refuse because your jealousy and hatred are stupefying you? BE HONEST NOW!

        And on top of it all, you’re also a conspiracy theorists because you think these Jews that dominate “said field” (whichever the hell you think it is) are using it to further their agendas at the detriment of gentiles. Let me guess, you are also one of those people who thinks we have been visited by UFOs and the government is covering it up, right? Believe in one conspiracy theory, believe in a 100 more.

        “The only mindless spiel I’m reading here in this thread is your insipid NAJALT toeing of the neocon party line.”

        I am about self-empowerment.

        I am about self-help.

        I am about facing the truth and forgoing delusional beliefs that only serve to make me feel better about myself.

        Bottom line, I am about facing reality. If to you that’s neocon party line, then you’re an idiot and worse; you’re an escapist form the truth, namely that you blindly hate people that you perceive are better than you, or have more power than you. Face it! Face who you are!

        I have an idea for you, instead of sitting here and trashing people who made it, go out and make it yourself. Trust me – no Jew is going to keep you from getting a job you qualify for, idiot. Trouble is, you probably don’t qualify for anything other than a KKK Grand Wizard.

        I tell stupid Blacks the same thing when they start ranting about whites. If they qualified for something, no white person would stand in their way. Trouble is, most of them don’t qualify for anything other than a toilette cleaner. Therefore, you and stupid Blacks are of the same mindset. If I were you, I would be embarrassed by that.

        To me you sound like a grumpy old man who never made it in life, so he is full of venom and anger and hate, and is taking it out on some imaginary Jewish people because he thinks they robbed him of opportunity. You are not about looking for solutions to the liberal agenda. You are about hating the Jew, nothing else, and therefore you’ll never be successful in finding solutions to liberalism or helping the white race. People, with your mindset will sink the white race, not help it.

        You fill Uh’s head with garbage to egg him on. The guy says his head is spinning and he wants to explode. I worry about him; that he’ll do something that lands him in jail or dead because of your incitement. You have no conscience and to you this is just a game. You probably need some amusement in your life, so you sit on this site 24/7 and you discharge garbage and hate that can get people in serious trouble.

        Let’s be honest now; you’re a fucking Nazi. Why hide it? Be honest with yourself and maybe I will respect you. At least Uh doesn’t hide who he is; he’s honest about himself and his beliefs. I don’t know why thou protest so very much!

        Like


      • Take a ride on the shabbos goy railroad, NiteLily… pass GO, collect 30 shekels of silver.

        Like


      • Milton “grow the money supply exponentially” Friedman is hardly the most principled “free market” advocate around. More like “slightly freer than here and now’ market. Try Rothbard for a real awakening. And better economics, without the mumbo jumbo, curve fitting and pulling stuff out of thin air that permeates macro so-called-economics.

        Like


    • Noone successful in politics, or any other organization large enough to make politicking essential, cares one whit about anyone but number one. So what else is new?

      I do agree with the general gist of this comment, though. It’s not as if Romney is somehow less giimmedat than Obama. Exactly who he promisies to give someone elses stuff to, may be slightly different at the margin, but he is still nothing but a redestributionist, progressive leech enabler of the worst sort. IOW, the whole enterprise of pretending that there is a meaningful difference between these two clowns, is indicative of falling for the most banal trick in the book.

      Like


    • Jason, its no use. All Greg and his crew see in Obama is a big black cock.

      Like


      • All I see in you is a dickhead who lacks reading comprehension.

        I’ve stated innumerable times that I don’t vote.

        I mean, it IS flattering that you coloureds and your fellow-travelers seem to single me out as the main man behind the resistance and the slap-downs your ilk gets on this forum… but I’m ashamed to take credit for greater minds than mine.

        Like


      • I’m guessing Michelle has the bigger cock in that relationship.

        Like


      • lol. I love niggers in denial.

        Like


    • Jason is commenting a lot today and yesterday. Obama must be panicking from his debate failure and unleashing his SWPL-faggot brigade to try to shut down anti-nigger and ant-Obama talk by any means necessary.

      I would worry, Jason; Your SWPL-faggot brigades, your man-hating feminazis, and your lazy, shiftless niggers will make sure—by vote stealing, by voter intimidation (a la Obama’s black panthers) —that anything close at the polls remarkably goes Obama’s way.

      Aloof alpha game. lmao.

      Like


      • All kidding aside, I’m convinced there is a concerted effort by cognitive dissonance agents, either paid or of the usual suspect ‘useful idiot’ true believer ilk, to pollute the ‘net with their tripe and shout down or attempt to ridicule any dissenting politics and sociobiological thought crime found on forums.

        It occurs in too many places, and the song is too strident and monotone, for it to be merely happenstance.

        Like


      • True; both political, to an extent, toll with misinformation/flame wars/etc.

        The danger (for them) is that we here argue facts that destroy leftism’s socio-political truths, i.e. that women are equal to men, that blacks are equal to normal humans, that homsexuality isn’t a bad thing, that redistributionism is the highest good.

        The left has, since the 1960s, controlled the media/media-dialect, so that now, even questioning these in public is verboten, punished by shunning from media, career devastation, firing, social shaming (“racist! Sexist! Bigot!”)etc.

        But the interwebs be not under their control. No mass-but-consolidated factories in Hollywood to churn out interweb drivel to control us. No shaming effect at websites.

        Free speech is dangerous to leftism. And thus the soviet-style disinformation parade.

        Like


      • Rabbi Feinberg’s Dynamic Silence doesn’t cut any ice in Cyberia…

        So for now, misinformation, disinformation, snark and flame are the marching orders of the day for the pismire brigade.

        But Satan’s time is now short… all accounts will be settled.

        Like


      • The rise of left-wing dominance in America was caused by the short lived period between widespread use of the telegraph/railroads and the the widespread use of the internet in the country (1860s-2000s).

        Pre-these inventions, American people lived more ensconced lives in terms of news. Any news from out of town might be questioned thoroughly, and people lived in distrust of strangers bearing news; people looked to leaders (their favored political party, their local minister) to ruthlessly run down distant stories, but otherwise what people gossiped about was local town news—and sources that could personally be verified.

        However, When the telegraph first hit, it allowed a few people (newsmen paid to be sitting in the telegraph office all day) the luxury of taking all the information around the country and spewing it forth with all their propaganda. The railroads also enabled this; since now a few papers could pay its reporters to cris-cross the country, and pay railroads to drop them off at most cities across the country, suddenly news was both larger (in terms of geography and amount of information) and smaller (now, only a few paid newsmen crisis-crossed the country and controlled the flow of information).

        The telephone’s rise managed to curb this a bit, since you could now call someone in NYC yourself instead of waiting for a newspaper to tell you what happened, but, really, who knew a “credible” person in NYC or DC to dispel truth from newspaper lies? The car also broke this down for the same reasons—the average man could now get out of town and see what was going on. However, how many would drive to DC to question a rep?

        The information mass was huge, but only a few people who made huge profits distilling it would tell it to you; it was too expensive for you to investigate anything beyond local news. Thus leftism was fueled by this control of information—people were hungry for news from further and further away, and thus had to rely on left-wingers (who worked hard to dominate the media) for the news.

        As the world got smaller (planes, radio, television), there still was the problem of how the average joe could garner news–and rich leftists paid handsomely to use their wealth to control the flow. Government regulators—-FCC, FAA, even the Postal Service—could control the flow of information by keeping prices artificially high for travel and communication, thus restricting those who told you things , again, rich leftist news organizations. And rich leftists used those regulators (whose idea they conceived) to clamp down on interlopers.

        For example, FDR shut down radio power Father Coughlin (a man who was, ironically, further left than FDR) by not allowing the U.S. mail service to deliver to him or deliver his leaflets. Most people don’t know how dirty the Kennedy clan played with conservative media as well—the Kennedy plan involved using the FCC to clamp down on independently-owned radio stations throughout the South, who supported right-wingers and disliked Kennedy on social issues–by, again, driving up licensing costs so that these poorer stations couldn’t stay on the air.

        Cable news was a dent in this, since the FCC wasn’t given control. The emergence of Fox News wasn’t new, it was an inevitable return of non-leftist media once opportunity costs dropped. But Fox was but a small dent compared to…

        The Internet. Combined with free blogs.

        Now, a person in Abu Dahbi can write for free, publish online, and report and highlight news and studies that hurt the dominant leftist media. The opportunity costs are nil; to read news from a world away costs me $30/month. As is to scream to the world about injustices, and be heard. Somewhere.

        This is why President Nigger signed his internet kill switch bill, and why leftists have suddenly turned so hard against free speech lately: now “free speech” that is not lefty-controlled drivel can’t be clamped down on, can’t be stopped, can’t be neutered, can’t be silenced.

        The internet is the doom of left-wing thought everywhere.

        But for our nation, it may be too late.

        Hmm, I think I’ll cross-post at my blog.

        Like


      • The rise of left-wing Jewish dominance in America

        http://www.amazon.com/Jewish-Century-Yuri-Slezkine/dp/0691127603

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 1:40 am gunslingergregi

        yea free speech is dangerous i guess huh

        Like


      • We ought to be ignoring Jason. Next time, don’t rise to the bait.

        Like


    • “he’s an economic vampire.” And someone who would steal your money to give to the shiftless, to buy their votes in order to steal even more and create ever more indolence isn’t an economic vampire?

      You merely wrap yourself in the cloak of vanity. You are the same as the “good people of Nantuckett in Moby Dick, who knew that their way of life was best and righteous and would eventually banish evil from the Earth, because all that needed to happen was for them to spread the word and convert everyone to their form of Protestant Christianity. Aren’t you aware of the Protestant evangelical roots of your Progressivism?

      Like


      • Jason’s a lefty SWPL faggot troll, probably sent over from Daily Kos after a memo from the Obam campaign—“Shut down those pro-white, pro-male, pro-straight truth tellers now, for the sake of President Nigger!”

        Just laugh at him, as you laugh at all Squealer’s propaganda b.s.

        Like


    • Forget trying to convince anyone who votes republican to think otherwise – the facts just don’t matter to them. After 8 years under Bush where the deficit exploded, where we had 2 unpaid and useless wars, where Wall Street was allowed to rob the country blind and then receive billions in taxpayer bailout money – if you still vote GOP, you need to put down the crack pipe. I’m no fan of Obama, but he HASN’T increased the size of the government, he has added less to the deficit than his predecessor, and he cut taxes on 95% of Americans. Obama has been a failure as a president, but voting for Romney is just insane. He would give the corporations free reign to do as they like, and anyone making less than a couple million would be nothing more than a slave. But these old white dudes are too blinded by anger and ignorance to care.

      Like


      • The facts mattering to me is precisely why I vote Republican.

        Like


      • “Obama has been a failure as a president, but voting for Romney is just insane. He would give the corporations free reign to do as they like, and anyone making less than a couple million would be nothing more than a slave.”

        Your bullshit doesn’t scare anyone. Under Obama there won’t be anyone making a couple of millions. Get a grip idiot. No one is buying your propaganda other than the uneducated disgruntled malcontent loser types.

        It’s time for you to go hang out in central park with the rest of the unemployed occupiers who talk 24/7 about millionaires and billionaires, instead of going out to get jobs. Dummy!

        Like


  8. Jason, re: your HS sophomore economic analysis of “blood sucker” Romney: the government doesn’t make anything. The government doesn’t fix anything. The “dying” companies (Staples?) Romney’s firm rescued, admittedly a few didn’ t make it, are companies that did make stuff. And fixed stuff. Stuff that people actually want to buy. Unlike, say, food stamps.

    Like


    • Try googling “leveraged buyout”

      Like


      • Absolutely. Romney was an early practitioner of the LBOs. The man is an amoral opportunist. In fact, last week he literally tried to look LESS WHITE to get what he wants.

        How’s that hang with you, WNs? Your beloved white savior deserting his own pigment? I don’t see anybody talking about THAT in these comments.

        Like


      • So did Obama. Or didn’t you see that video?

        Like


      • You err in thinking that WN cares about Romney or any bought-and-paid-for-politico this rotten system of things at all.

        Try to think in three dimensions, alphie.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 3:07 pm Hugh G. Rection

        So what? Leveraging up was always a strategy to return money to investors. The fact that American companies are sitting on trillions in “cash” means that money doesn’t find it’s way back into the economy. Leveraging a company or at least disbursing that cash is in many cases a good way to pay shareholders for their risk, especially in a market like this that is hungry for yield.

        Like


      • When the money returned to investors by the leveraging is lent into existence in a fractional reserve banking system; which is then backed by taxpayers via the Fed; the money returned to investors are generally taken directly from other participants in the economy.

        Romney did his job, but him and investors making money personally does not mean any of what he did, created actual value.

        And even if he did create real value during his tenure at Bain, the fact that he supported the banking bailouts, shows in no uncertain terms that he could care less whether there is any kind of link between creating value, and personally expropriating others’ wealth. Making the guy nothing but dispensable scum, by any reasonable moral standard.

        Like


      • That is all sound, Stuki, but if your criterion is creating value, we have not and will not find it in Black Run America: the turn-around to the unfit, and ongoing military expenditure, are just too high. Citizens and the military would have to be cut loose before we could even approach surplus anymore. That is frightening to both Parties, of course, but both are enormous money sinks nowhere near returning on the vast sums dumped into them — and not because they’ve been mismanaged, as either Party would claim; because they were both quixotic projects from the start, both based on Big Lies: equality, and Israel’s security.

        The rest as I see it is just fiddling with ledgers, like Kramer and Newman trying to balance the cost of driving to Michigan with bags of bottles and cans to exchange for 10 cents.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 11:38 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Hang on Stuki. First you say the money is created into the existence by the Federal Reserve, then you say it’s generally taken from directly from “other participant” (meaning not the banking/federal reserve system)? Which is it?

        There was a value add here. The value just mostly accrued to one party, and as it often is with financial transactions, for one side to win another side must lose (the very nature of things like swaps, options or insurance).

        Now if I we talk generally, yeah, this is only useful/valuable to very few, but it’s not like he’s taken great companies and singlehandedly ruined them. Do you think Mitt would be out designing cars, curing diseases or building bridges? And a lot of these rich pricks then dole out their money to charities to uphold the appearance of being a valuable member of society while telling the little guy he should work harder. He’s basically giving money away to people who are NOT working for it.

        It’s not a very admirable way to make a living. But he did create value for someone, because he provided a service someone was willing to pay for. Compare that to a single mom on welfare. Her getting knocked up by Thug Nr. 2 to produce future Thug nr. 4 is very likely to create negative value. That’s who the other guy cares about. Great choices.

        Like


      • Hugh G. Rection,

        When the Fed prints dollars and gives them at below market rates to those with preferential access to credit (the financial complex and orbiters), all those outside of that little clique have their money debased, iow stolen from them.

        And, there are people out there perfectly willing to pay $20 to have America nuked into a barren dessert. Does that mean that doing so is a value creating activity?

        I hate sounding like some libtard in an echo chamber, but in order to assess whether Romney created value, you have to look externalities, as well as his own compensation. Which is very hard to do, when so much of his compensation comes directly from the Fed robbing 99% of the population in order to prop up their constituency of banks and other money movers.

        @Uh,

        As for black people and value, Satchmo created more of it with every few breaths he blew into a trumpet, than 99% of whites do in an entire lifetime of hard work🙂

        Like


      • You’ve officially surpassed “Jason” in anti-white hatred. Good job, faggot. Must be German.

        Like


      • “Romney was an early practitioner of the LBOs. The man is an amoral opportunist.”

        “I’m choosing the present and future state of my pocketbook over my race, buddy.”

        — Jason, anti-white punk

        ” Your beloved white savior deserting his own pigment? ”

        Simple straw man: no one here believes Romney is or could be, even if he ardently wanted, the savior of white Americans.

        Keep stoking your own fires though.

        Like


      • It’s amazing how liberals think all Republicans are white nationalists because brown people all vote for the Dems.

        Like


      • And the obverse: even if I express nakedly white nationalist ideas, the most they can scrape together mentally to reckon with it is, “Are you a Republican or something?”

        Like


  9. Fuck the two of em.

    The american public needs to be weaned off Momma government’s teat, and the tax system needs to be changed. There is no reason why a doctor or lawyer should be taxed more than $10,000,000+ net worth making income off capital gains.

    Republicans are turning this country into a banana republic
    Democrats are turning this country into weak willed spineless handout mongers.

    Fuck the both of them.

    Like


    • That’s not the answer. Romney is better than Obama. If you let Obama win, you’re just allowing the Blacks/feminists/illegals/gays have their way and turn the country into the collapse of Rome. Do you feel comfortable handing off your country to backward ass blacks and nasty cows?

      Like


      • In engineering, one of the most important things to aim for is “fail fast.” Meaning, if something doesn’t work, it should blow up sooner, rather than later. The longer the defect remains hidden in the background, the more expensive it will get when it finally surfaces.

        In the early days of the Fed, the Governors were very much cognizant of this. Which lead to a policy of lend freely against good collateral, but at rather punitive rates. By doing this, enterprises that were only propped up by cheap credit, would collapse, so that the resources they laid claim to would be spat back onto the market, where they may be put to better use. And it worked like a charm in ’21, where a 20+% drop in GDP one year, were followed by a roaring recovery in the next.

        Of course, it was never given a chance in the ’30s, since the “incompetents” by then, had amassed such massive wealth on the back of over leverage, that they managed to corrupt the state and the Fed into cushioning their personal blow, instead turning into a decade long depression. Just like our current wealthy class have done.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 1:07 am Mr. Pointyface

        You had your dimwitted war-monger, now we’ve got a bright humanist liberal. Don’t worry, he won’t start concentration camps for people who don’t like his race.

        Like


      • You’re fooling yourself. Obama is neither bright or a humanist. He’s a greedy opportunist who’s using idiots like yourself to further his personal agenda. Put down the Kool-Aid.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 1:09 pm Hugh G. Rection

        But he does for himself reserve the right to kill anyone, even US citizens, without a trial, without due process, without public record. Usually even a banana republic will give you a fake trial at least. Maybe Obama could put that into law next year by executive decree, I suggest it be televised and presided over by Judge Reinhold.

        Like


      • Not yet. But we’re building them.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 1:46 am gunslingergregi

        been gettin handed off through hud over 20 years ago and nobody stopped it nobody gonna stop it now

        Like


  10. I have been reading this blog for quite a while, but I have the luck to not be American. With that out in the open, let me ask you – have you ever had a lingering stereotypical prejudice towards something, which you know might just be unjustified, but you still can’t get rid of it? Like, for example, when you hear someone (usually emo looking, probably teen) saying that they write poetry – fuck, they might just be a great poet, what do I know? Jack shit about poetry, that’s what. But the first things that come to mind after hearing a sentence like that are attention whore, smug, pretentious and stupid.

    Well, I have that same thing with Americans talking about politics – tunnel-visioned, restricted view of the world boiling down to only “liberal” and “conservative”, debated on the internet by dangerously stupid people etc.

    I’m sure there’s a minority of you guys who actually know what they’re doing, and to those, I apologize. The rest of you however, just stay at home and tend to the cattle, because the shit you vote on can affect my small third world country very negatively.

    Like


    • Yeah, it’s tunnel vision here in the US sometimes. We do forget just how influential our presidential elections are in small countries.

      Like


    • Another recently enfranchised wog lecturing white men in their own language, in their own house.

      Like


      • And alphie right there to hold his dick for him.

        Like


      • Sniper. Make an argument. Be a real man.

        Like


      • Heh… show me a real man and I’ll argue with him if we disagree.

        Problem is, all the real men on this thread are poking your sorry ass with a stick for amusement.

        Like


      • Sniper. Make an argument.

        Or else just keep running.

        Like


      • This guy. He’s been around before, didn’t he brag about how he’s like the smartest person in the room or something?

        Like


      • “Romney was an early practitioner of the LBOs. The man is an amoral opportunist.”

        “I’m choosing the present and future state of my pocketbook over my race, buddy.”

        — Jason, anti-white punk

        Like


      • “Your third world shithole must adapt or die.
        Besides, most of the people that you deem dangerous are isolationists who don’t care whether you prosper or not. It’s all up to you and your people.”

        True Olympus.

        I’m from the same country as Damir(or the neighbourhood).
        Damir is probably either Croat, Serb or Bosnian/Muslim.
        My thinking brother Damir is that America is on the top of the world, and so why would they be concerned or take even the slightest account of some Balkan shithole, in deciding who’s going to rule THEIR country. Sorry dude but that’s just idiotic. And is it really that you can compare them with “teenagers”? Surely, a lot of Americans look, and behave stupid(sorry guys sometimes it’s just hillariously stupid), but than put your head out of your ass and think for a minute: how is it that they have the largest GDP in the world, and it’s 2x greater than that of the China which is the second on the list? They are so strong that no one comes even close to them. Not to mention the military might, that world has never seen so far, also unmatched not even close by any of her adversaries in either navy, ground, space and particulary not air forces. Best scientists this planet can offer too.

        Russia? Germany? Japan? fricking dwarwes. EU as a whole though has larger GDP, but i hope you’re not that retarded to take that as something meaningfull.

        Did i told you to get your head out of your ass? Well i strongly reccomend that you don’t put it back too soon, before you come to realize that America along with the rest of the western powers(but America makes about 80% of that) is enabling your luxurious life, that about 70% of the world population does not enjoy(running water is one of those luxuries that many lack, not to mention health and pension ensurances, your house, car etc.), and do you know what do Africans say when they come to our Balkan shithole? “You guys are having a really nice life”. Libya had the simmilar standard as ours, and the Lybians were considered by other africans as “rich” during the Khadaffi reign.

        Who would you like more to replace Americans as our “big brother” and sponsor? Maybe Russia? China? India? Maybe Turkey? EU? EU sounds good, and indeed Germany, France and UK do stick their noses in our bussines, but as long as Americans turn a blind eye, or indulge their actions, but when Americans say NO! Than no it is.
        Remember: First they made the “Operation Storm” possible when Clinton struck the Washington alliance of 1994. and than stop us at the outskirts of the capital of the Bosnian Serb republic in the middle of kicking the Serbian ass. ( reffering to the Dayton agrement here), also Kosovo indenpendence of 2008. – all of it is from an American kitchen.
        So EU is right now(or actually for a long time now – lol maybe even from the start) like a child that is threatening to run from (American)house, but is afraid to cross the road near.

        For the end; if you preffer Russia, Turkey, or Chinese overlordship of our little Balkan provinces: 1) you’re insane; 2) think how they treat their own populations, and than try to imagine what treatment we would have gotten.

        So, live long decadent America! For as long as you live we’ll have peace on the Balkans.

        Jason you’re traitor to your nation.
        Can’t understand why are you fighting for everybody else, but overlook interests of your own nation.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 6:21 pm gunslingergregi

        yea sure we saved you but also brought the divorce laws that enslaved you
        weren’t you better off with a house and family and now your wife is in it and you aren’t.

        Like


      • “Jason you’re traitor to your nation.
        Can’t understand why are you fighting for everybody else, but overlook interests of your own nation.”

        Damned eloquent. Kosovo ja serpska.

        Like


      • Can’t necessarily blame divorce on Americans. Western Europe, especially the UK, is even more decadent.

        In the case of Yugoslavia, of course, the USA might be expected to be more balanced. Russia favors the Serbs and Turkey the Muslims (Bosniaks or Albanians, whichever), and the EU would be expected to favor Croatia for historical reasons, making these powers less suitable as overseers.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 1:48 am gunslingergregi

        pro female divorce laws brought to countries courtesy of the red white and blue

        Like


      • “Weren’t you better off with a house and family and now your wife is in it and you aren’t”?

        Hmm, maybe, but to choose option where your house is being overrun by a serbian tank, like in town of Vukovar…
        Surely we croats defended ourselves, nobody did it for us, but than if Americans weren’t making the balance at the end of the war, i don’t know when would it have ended.

        I’m from Croatia, and my father fought in two of five Balkan wars (Croatia, and Bosnia). You had the situation where Russia was main supporter of Serbia, but at that time it was weak, and didn’t do much to further Serbian cause – it didn’t had to since, Serbs grabed almost all of the weapons of former Yugoslav army(4th in the Europe by number of weapons), than comes EU that you say has love for Croatia – WRONG! Germany, and Austria have love – and interests in Croatia, and that Automatically means that UK, and France favor Serbia, since they feared(and still do) of any spreading of German influence. And Turkey,well Turkey was at a time a giant asleep, and it is often stated that the US and even Saudi Arabia helped muslims in Bosnia more than the Turks did. At a present time Turkey is resurging it’s influence with astonishing speed, and you can see Turkish investors everywhere in Bosnia. But they’re smart, and today they invest in Croatian bussnises, and even Serbian, not just muslim, because they hope for Bosnia to remain a unified state, where they want to see Bosniaks with their natality, or otherwise dominating the whole teritory. Bosniaks would have serious setbacks if Bosnia falls apart on ethnic lines like former Yugoslavia, and more recently Serbia, and that’s why the Turks are triing to create feeling among Croats and Serbs in Bosnia that they are professionals who have the destiny of all three ethnicities at their heart, when in fact Bosniaks/Muslims are the greatest beneficiaries of the current state of affairs in Bosnia.

        And you think that only America brought us the concept of the divorce? Nope, it was there since 1946, and that means it was brought to us by the communism. Surely America and the rest of the west brought to us many wrong things(like “gay is ok”) which our enlightened kleptocratic government couldn’t wait to embrace, just to suckup to the EU, still divorce or abortion are not of these things that were brought to us by the USA.
        Hell yeah we’re triing to follow you in everything imaginable(except in the matters of responsability, and the standard of living though), so we even made the prices to be like your western, (but in the paycheck department we like to be a lot more conservative (middle) eastern) and so on.

        Like


    • Your third world shithole must adapt or die.
      Besides, most of the people that you deem dangerous are isolationists who don’t care whether you prosper or not. It’s all up to you and your people.

      Like


    • Yup.
      It’s amazing how many people here hate on Obama for being “pro-jewish: while Romney is the one who says he’ll bomb Iran and drag the USA into another war just to help Israel.
      And how funny it is to see people who hate on blacks/women/hispanics/whatever for blah blah, while voting for the guy who supports the corporations who actively import these people and helps them because they can pay them lower salaries.

      Like


    • Guh, I’ve heard variations of this overseas before. It’s always something like “non-Americans should get to vote in US elections, because you guys run the world!”. Usually comes from liberal Germans. I do agree that our nation does influence the rest of the world to a disproportionate degree. Dismantling the United States’ economic and military influence, however, would leave an international power vacuum that would be filled by another country that will be far, far worse for the developing world. China, maybe? One of the biggest violators of human rights on the planet? Does that sound like a good idea to anyone?

      The conservative vs liberalism debate is central to US politics, because it cuts at the heart of what concerns Americans – the size and scope of our government. Most foreigners I’ve met overseas don’t understand how our government operates on any level, in any way. You’re likely just as ignorant about our political system as we are about yours. But I can understand why it would be confusing and irritating to be looking in on.

      Like


      • LOL @ “human rights”

        The US needs to stop pushing its inhuman rights on the rest of the world. They are far worse and far more corrosive than any Chinese or Russian bullying.

        Like


  11. If you want to see the apex of big-stage alpha domination and natural beta peevishness/supplication, study the debate tape last night. It’s all there: eye contact, tone, command, humor, relaxation, poise, posture, content, logos, pathos, ethos. Straight outta Aristotle’s Rhetoric.

    Romney has his own occasional beta tells, but none were on display yesterday. He was in total command of his opponent, the moderator, the audience, and the broadcast viewership. It was the biggest massacre in the history of presidential debates, in part achieved by lulling an arrogant overachiever with a glass jaw into complacency and underestimation (Obama was in Vegas “preparing”), stepping on his windpipe, and not letting up for 90 minutes. This is as close to a display of ancient Roman imperium as our effete modern republic allows its politicians.

    Matt

    Like


    • Romney’s did have one big beta tell on display at the end when he kept bouncing up on his toes as he delivered his closing remarks. boink, boink, boink… it’s something that will be mocked on SNL. Neither was too verbally aggressive to the moderator, but you don’t want people to think you’re power-mad,

      Like


    • on October 4, 2012 at 2:29 pm FuriousFerret

      King A, what is your profession?

      Like


      • Professional ferret furrier.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 3:31 pm FuriousFerret

        I would say lawyer, academic, or MBA banker due to your knowledge of latin (ten dollar words) and frequent allusions to ancient Greek/Roman culture.

        Like


      • My guess is semi-retired gynecologist who still likes to visit the office one or two days a week… just to keep a hand in.

        Like


      • Nah. He’s a middle aged asian lady working at taco bell.

        True story. That’s why (s)he won’t even deny it.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 8:54 pm Political Atheist

        Neo-con republican dicksuck.

        Come November, I’ll vote to pay homage to the sacrifice of my kin but it won’t be for either of the two who were on the stage last night. The republic is long gone.

        Just because you can vote to change your master every four years doesn’t make you any less a slave.

        Like


    • Ha! I’m guessing you’re being satirical. If not, check out this clip:

      http://www.inquisitr.com/352807/the-loser-of-last-nights-debate-jim-lehrer/

      Romney’s cadence is choppy and frantic. He’s reactive, constantly responding to jabs from Obama instead of making his own. He gets flustered by Lehrer. In contrast, Obama was calm. Perhaps too calm. Aloof, laconic maybe?

      They’re obviously both super alphas but saying Romney ‘out alpha’d’ Obama is ridiculous, according to the alpha male traits emphasized on this site.

      I guess we see what we want to see.

      Like


    • Exaggeration, but the main thrust is true.

      Romney’s most consistent beta behavior last night was the permanent half-smile he wore. Another was trying to end every speaking block on a soapbox pronunciamento (“… and that’s my plan to create jobs and restore prosperity in America,” smile).

      He let the half-smile down to level some consistent statements of policy, and well-modulated pathos about jobs, which was smooth and convincing, even if the details are questionable.

      I also noted POTUS’ nodding. He gave a lot of latitude. Overall a totally unsporting performance. Also thought his persistence in addressing “the American people” by looking at the camera was transparently try-hard, out of an effective public speaking playbook.

      Like


      • Romney’s performance was by no means flawless. But it was the very best we will see, given the restrictions on manly behavior in politics.

        Ryan has a chance to equal Romney next week; he has better control of the “half-smile” and “pronunciamento” ticks. But the VP candidate’s voice is tragically, slightly reedy, and does not command as naturally as Romney’s made-for-radio baritone does.

        Matt

        Like


    • King A (Matthew King)
      .
      Romney has his own occasional beta tells, but none were on display yesterday. He was in total command of his opponent, the moderator, the audience, and the broadcast viewership. It was the biggest massacre in the history of presidential debates,
      —————————–

      Not really. Bammy pulled a rope-a-dope and let Rmoney punch himself out. Sure Mitt was the agressor, but it made him look desparate too.

      But most importantly, it will be easier for bammy to step up his game for the last debate. Rmoney shot his wad last night and will have a more difficult time amping up his game without looking like a drewling spazz.

      And finally, if Obama is too agressive, he runs the risk of looking like “the angry black man”.

      Point Obama

      Like


      • Unfortunately there is no rope-a-dope in debates so your point fails. Romney won this round and will easily gain momentum in the next two.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 1:13 am Mr. Pointyface

        Yes, Turbo, Murkans are going to REALIZE the truth and vote for a guy dumb enough to follow a religion started by a convicted confidence man. Great at business, dumb as a box of rocks when it comes to who’s telling the truth. Amazing combination.

        Like


      • I have no idea what people are going to realize or not, and my post made no comment on that so I have no idea what you’re alluding to. My point was that Romney was the better man in the debate and will continue to prove himself in the coming two debates. If you’d like to argue that, fine, but I’m not interested in your infantile snark.

        Like


  12. Yeah, if only chicks could be like every other demographic. Ya know, the ones who vote on policy only. (Now excuse me while I go hide my guns before Obama come get em!)

    Like


    • Some of us do… but I think the bigger problem with women is that we’re always trying to not stick out from the crowd. We’re more inclined to hold the same opinions as other women than to adopt and defend our own, so if a political party manages to capture the perception of being the one that women ALL believe in, most women are going to conform to that.

      Like


  13. Downplaying social conservatism would get an extra 10% for the GOP, especially from young single males. Romney has not downplayed it enough. That’s his fault. Just not talking about it wasn’t enough. For instance,a Ron Paul style remark that the fed government has no interest in censoring porn or regulating sexual activity between adults would have put Romney in the lead by now, especially if Romney went after young single males aggressively. Don’t think for a second that young single males want to stop having lots of sexual opportunities. Quite the opposite. Half the manosphere gets this tragically wrong, meaning they are tragically out of touch with most single men.

    The founding fathers made a big mistake in not writing the constitution flame proof enough and then, under Wilson, the amendment giving women suffrage should have had extra language preventing them from abusing it. There was no such language.

    Another way out of this mess is to push for a Third Party Amendment which would change the US into a parliamentary republic. Ron Paul types could then grab 10% of each election and co-rule with the Republicans.

    Otherwise, if Obama wins, someone like Rand Paul has to go against him in 2016 and only if Rand notes that his personal social conservatism won’t make him more like Sarah Palin than his father.

    Like


    • Social cons as a political movement are useless, they’ve bought in to most of the Kool Aid the left is selling.

      Social conservatism as a defense of a more or less coherent set of western values makes a lot of sense. You should be able to connect the dots between entitled, depraved acting out-of-control hypergamous women, and the decay in our morals. Game is only here because our morality and social ethos were destroyed, leaving a vacuum.

      Like


      • Asinine, fourth-hand claptrap. Save it for your community college poli-sci exam.

        “Social cons” as a “political movement” is an oxymoronic concept. Conservatives by definition do not attempt restoration through politics, other than through their efforts to remove politics from the culture. “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s….” The “cons” who co-opt the left’s tactics are just as effective as you imagine they would be — pass a constitutional amendment to ban booze! or flag burning! — and are not conservative in the strict meaning of the term. The rest of us properly have our focus on the culture.

        So when you say we are “useless” “as a political movement,” that is by design, not by Kool Aid consumption. We target hearts and minds, the ethos that rises above (and makes possible) the rule of law itself.

        Matt

        Like


      • And how is that strategy working so far? I tend to agree with the idea that things are past the point of saving, so until things fall apart, poolside is the only appropriate political position. Mind, I would like to see feminism countered in the cultural sphere but I just don’t see it happening now or in the near future.

        Like


      • All conservatives roll over. They can’t help it. The anti-white, anti-family storm has been gathering for a hundred years. Jews.

        Like


      • Enough already!!! Everything to you is the Jews. Please be a little bit more realistic. It’s liberals, not Jews. Are you wisely looking for an answer or just mired in mindless hate?

        Like


      • Of course. For as we all know, culture comes before biology, not biology before culture. That would be “biological determinism” — and that is wrong — much like criticizing Jews — many of whom, not at all suspiciously, are strongly against biological determinism i.e. biomechanics i.e. this blog.

        Like


      • Seriously, why do you think that the reason Jews in general promote the liberal because they are Jews, and not because they are liberals?

        Like


      • JEWS ARE A DISTINCT AND EXCLUSIVE BREEDING POPULATION WITH A UNIQUE PSYCHOLOGY.

        BIOLOGY COMES BEFORE CULTURE.

        WE ARE NOT BLANK SLATES. EVEN JEW STEVEN PINKER AGREES WITH ME.

        SEE? IT’S KOSHER TO BE A DETERMINIST TOO!!!! LOLOLOLOLOL IT’S LIKE THREY PLAY BOTHT SIDEZ LLZLZLZOZO

        THERE, I HAVE SPELLED IT OUT FOR YOU.

        Like


      • Christians as a group, are the most financially successful demographic, despite all the snarky comments to the contrary. White, evangelical Christians take the lead here. They are disproportianately small business owners, etc. They also lead in education, health, and nearly all other social benchmarks. You’d be a fool to exclude them.

        Like


    • Downplaying social conservatism would get an extra 10% for the GOP, especially from young single males.

      You mean those young single males who are half the population of their parents’, vote at half the rate, and are not anything close to uniformly libertarian as you claim?

      You have zero understanding of the electorate. If only the candidate were more like me, he would win easily! is a mindfart trapped in the dutch oven of a teenager’s basement bedroom.

      Matt

      Like


      • You’re in rare form today, alte kameraden.

        Like


      • correction- Alter Kamerad

        Like


      • Thanks… I’m terribly rusty, and never learned proper grammar the way I ought to have.

        Like


      • Their parents also don’t want to see their sons sent to jail because a Mormon zealot that Romney could have been (but hopefully is not) could, like Bush, increase computer confiscations at airports to check for porn and photos of your niece building sand castles at the beach, increase decoy female cops entrapping men into agreeing to buy sex, blackmail other countries like Bush did into outlawing prostitution and arresting American male tourists, and all to the delight of the feminists who control the right as much as they do the left.

        Parents listen to their grown sons. Ron Paul was getting a lot of converts until Romney’s people colluded with the left wing journalist community to pretend that movement is dead. That’s at least 10% of Americans right there.

        You’re wrong, Matt, if you think Romney wouldn’t lose millions of men who currently plan to vote for him, if the Democrat journalists are smart enough in the next few weeks to corner him on his plans to ban pornography.

        This isn’t so much about small l libertarianism, which matches what at least 20% of males want (roughly matching the alpha population – the ones out there having sex and not the keyboard jockeys in the manosphere who dream about ending the sexual revolution because they aren’t getting any).

        And no man who is getting laid well will really want to see that end.

        It’s about common sense. Socialist conservatives these days want a progressive society where individualism is suppressed for the common good. Most of what passes for modern socialist conservatism is just right wing feminism. Anti-john laws, raising the age of consent, banning porn which teaches men to idealize nubile girls and not want to accept aging fatties. That’s just right wing feminism where prostitution and doing 15 year olds was legal for 99% of recorded history until suffrage happened.

        Most men, especially those who become alpha, would completely disagree with the asinine meme of this blog that we should all reluctantly game women for sex even though we supposedly all want some asshole patriarch telling us that we can’t have sex with more than one girl who will get old and no longer sexy after 3-5 years.

        Hard monogamy probably never existed in history. Alphas are more under attack now than ever and the tradcons of today don’t even realize that they are carrying water for the feminists who want, after age 35, to force men their age to marry them. Remember, the older hags want the younger females to be sluts in order to ruin them so the older men may as well just marry them (the hags),

        CH needs to not only forget this meme that there are any alphas besides himself that would want socialist conservatism to ever become a norm again. Socialist conservatives are beta by definition. He needs to actively work to reverse the confusion he’s caused in the manosphere on this point. He’s been all over the map and maybe that is because of multiple guest bloggers.

        Only beta males want to be told they can’t have a harem and that’s only because they are afraid to compete with alpha males or consider themselves out of the game.

        An alpha male, by definition, wants to fuck multiple women until he dies and he would not allow a social conservative society to exist unless he was one of the leaders who would not have to follow the rules.

        Of course an alpha male will oppose socialism. He will know women are easier to lay when daddy government hasn’t bought them a T Bird.

        Hating social conservativism goes hand in hand with hating lefty socialism because the social cons and the lefties are together in wanting new laws that never existed before to control behavior for the supposed good of “society”.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 5:03 pm gunslingergregi

        yea freedom just a word nice post

        Like


      • No one will ban porn and no one will be arrested for visiting prostitutes overseas. I was in Germany when the Executive Order came out from Bush on visiting hookers. it only impacted those who were known to be trafficked. The order was nothing but a sop to the church lady element of his base. It was not even remotely enforced.

        Like


      • Actually, “doing 15-year-olds” has long been frowned upon. Back in the day, most women did not get their first periods until 16 and people (correctly) were pretty disturbed at the prospect of having sex with someone who still hadn’t reached full maturity. Hence, the average age for marriage throughout 18th and 19th century America hovered between 21 and 23 and was still as high as 22 in the early 1940s.

        Like


      • “An alpha male, by definition, wants to fuck multiple women until he dies and he would not allow a social conservative society to exist unless he was one of the leaders who would not have to follow the rules.”

        Elites and free-riders always exist. It isn’t a matter of alphas “allowing” a socially conservative society nor of betas wanting one: the nuclear family was not a fluke or a bubble. I have the displeasure to inform you that this presumption of the flimsiness of the nuclear family (called an “institution” to give the illusion that it can be dismantled) is basically Marxist and later, Feminist / Cultural Marxist. I don’t often appeal to bogeymen but this is a textbook case. You mistake your own position for conditions everywhere throughout history, and expunge an important corner from the human psyche: the drive to keep house. This is especially strong among white men.

        ” the keyboard jockeys in the manosphere who dream about ending the sexual revolution because they aren’t getting any”

        You have aligned yourselves with cultural Marxists, feminists, Planned Parenthood employees, compulsive hair-cutters, cat-cuddlers and gothic land whales everywhere — congrats.

        “Of course an alpha male will oppose socialism. He will know women are easier to lay when daddy government hasn’t bought them a T Bird.”

        ‘Twas capitalist entrepreneurship, not socialism, that brought the T Bird into existence.

        Like


      • Sorry uh, but most men are polygamous by nature and not interested in keeping house for long. You mistake your own drive for those of other men. Wanting to live in a soft monogamous society while practicing soft polygamy (virtual harems where the girls don’t all know each other) isn’t socialist at all. It’s the way most men are.

        You are on the wrong blog if you disagree with this.

        This blog is about learning how to create MLTRs (harems).

        It’s not supposed to be a hangout for married guys or betas who don’t want to compete with those guys who intend to take a honey for themselves plus the honey you had your sights on for marriage.

        I see guys every day who are so proud of being with their “one and only” who I paid for sex last year. Am I bad for that? No, their women wanted to sell themselves when they were younger. It’s female nature and not related to feminism.

        What is socialist would be if you tried to use government to force your monogamous views on others for the “good of the community” that polygamous men don’t agree with you on.

        White nationalism doesn’t need social conservatism in its program. Even if you think it does, it definitely does not need to kowtow or seek the approval of women who can’t have babies anymore who are hateful about men their age wanting fertile hot women.

        Republican Senator Rubio just joined a bunch of Democrat fag senators to demand the shutdown of Backpage.com. I’ve never even looked at that site nor would I use professional whores, but it’s alarming to see American politicians on both sides of the fence try to pass laws that have never been passed before and it’s because it kowtows to the increasing political power of older women.

        Remember, men have only faced serious legal regulations for heterosexual activity since women got the right to vote.

        It’s bizarre that this of all forums is frequented so much by those who present themselves as male but who really don’t care about getting laid much.

        The author of this blog consistently recommends building your own harem.

        I see no difference between you and Jason.

        Like


      • An alpha male, by definition, wants to fuck multiple women until he dies and he would not allow a social conservative society to exist unless he was one of the leaders who would not have to follow the rules.

        You haven’t got the slightest idea what you are talking about.

        Like


      • “Remember, the older hags want the younger females to be sluts in order to ruin them so the older men may as well just marry them (the hags),”

        That’s awkward conspiracy theorizing right there. It would be safer to say that feminists want younger females to be sluts because they are delusional cunts who believe in equality and one welcome consequence of sluttifying girls is that old hags will be slightly more appealing to beta losers.

        Feminists are nowhere near that smart. They just hate men and they found a way to get back at them with cultural marxism, equalist thinking and freudian bullshitting.

        Like


      • So they attack each and every resentment they’ve nursed all their lives and make it illegal or socially unacceptable and thereby run society. It doesn’t have to be a conspiracy when its in their nature. They don’t have to be smart either, just act on their gut emotions, solipsism and arrogance.

        Like


      • What’s so bad about banning porn? Porn is for fucking losers.

        Like


      • And there are too many of them, who are otherwise productive members of society but they don’t have any game. And they need sexual relief to keep being productive.

        But you’re half right. I would ban porn and legalize prostitution.

        Like


      • I like the way you think. Men should be encouraged to really get laid, not jack off to pictures. Victorian society basically did this. They banned the public sale of porn without raiding men’s bookshelves or checking their briefcases for it at train stations while prostitution and sugar daddying was legal where lower class girls were available to keep things fun for married men with money. Victorian society was a soft monogamy society. It seemed to work well.

        Pragmatically in the current American matriarchy, however, attempts to ban porn are not motivated by the reasons you and I would have to do so, which is that men should be encouraged by the state to go out and get younger, hotter, tighter women in real life. Recent attempts to ban porn are motivated by the matriarchy as part of a real desire among older hags with political clout, and this is not a conspiracy theory, to stop men their age from having sexual relations or even visualizing sexual relations, with younger, more nubile women. The churchladies who control the anti-porn websites talk of men getting “unrealistic expectations” from looking at the kind of women they’d prefer to have sex with over the churchladies themselves. They don’t want men seeing ads for the competition, which is what the matriarchy sees porn as.

        Manginas who agree with this view think differently from you or I who presumably want to have sex with the most ideally attractive young women we can find in real life. We just want men to have game enough to go for the real thing, which is the opposite of what those who join anti-porn crusades want.

        Now Romney signed the mangina pledge from that mangina family council in Iowa. Ron Paul refused to do so. I’m hoping that Romney is not serious about supporting the matriarchal agenda too much when in office.

        So real conservative men have to stick their fingers in the eyes of these matriarchs and at least think “Get back to the kitchen and don’t tell us what to do. And because you don’t like porn for the opposite reason I don’t like porn, I think I’ll oppose you on banning it”. That’s because other men, who might see you allying with the matriarchs, will assume you’re just their kitchen bitch otherwise and refuse to vote for the same political party as you’re voting for.

        That will keep single men voting overwhelmingly Democrat, although I admit that the main reason young men without jobs vote Democrat is because they subconsciously want to kneecap richer older males in the fight for hot young females and get wealth transferred to themselves for doing nothing but voting for Obama.

        In the end, because of the churchlady reasoning behind it all, like the canary in the coal-mine, serious attempts to ban porn “use” are leading edge factors in attempts to violate the fourth amendment search and seizure guarantees on behalf of older right wing feminists (they control both parties now) and to bring in new anti-john laws and higher age of consent laws, where if things keep going the way they are going, it can someday be illegal in the US for a man over 30 to have sex with a woman under 21. It already is illegal to have sex with another adult of the opposite sex in Texas, and soon California, if the older person has a so-called position of “authority” over the younger one.

        To the matriarchy, “male authority” = “inequality”

        Like


      • Dude. The president is my employee. He replaces the urinal cakes in of the john when they need freshening and empties the waste baskets after hours. He is not the sovereign. He is the public servant of the sovereign, who is me.

        For you to read so much alpha fantasy fulfillment into the political dynamic is to misunderstand both politics and alpha. I do not vote for president thinking he will stand in my stead and take over the responsibilities of commanding the culture to certain ends. I vote for the one who will fuck up least: incompetence requires my attention away from private pursuits so that I can unfuck his mistakes. I don’t care what his opinion is about pornography or abortion or my private “lifestyle.” I only care that he fuck up less than the alternative, given the limited job I assigned him.

        Your whole disquisition on what political policies “alpha males” want is irrelevant to the subject. Your attempt to consider certain policy preferences as the mark of alpha or beta or omega tells me you understand nothing of politics and very little of manliness. The man is concerned where the rubber hits the road, the challenges in front of him, the order within his sphere of influence. Fantasists and escapists dream of alpha male prerogatives, which are as distant to him as D.C., and imagine they somehow correlate with national policy one-to-one.

        I conduct my life as I see fit until they come and stop me. Legally or illegally, within or without the bounds of accepted propriety, no matter what empty suit resides for four years in one constitutional office among three branches and fifty states in the republic. I do not place my hopes and dreams in men I’ve never met (though I have met Mitt). I simply want a man up to the job of reversing the rookie maintenance mistakes that have accelerated the republic into crisis over the last decade. Because I really don’t want to press pause on my real life to lead a revolution.

        Get yourself one of those real lives, son. You’ll relax about political minutiae. And it’s all minutiae.

        Matt

        Like


      • That was well said. Kudos.

        Like


      • Every f@cking thing the man says is well said.

        He’s the Antithwack.

        Like


      • You’re wrong, Matt, if you think Romney wouldn’t lose millions of men who currently plan to vote for him, if the Democrat journalists are smart enough in the next few weeks to corner him on his plans to ban pornography.

        So, they’ll vote for Obama out of spite? Or they’ll sit at home and harrumph and not vote just to show them! like some pouting fat cooze whose daddy just told her to take the ice-cream spoon out of her chubby facehole, get off the couch, and go do her chores? Or they’ll write in Ron Paul?

        You daydreamers spin these complicated rationales for your vote as some kind of proxy for true power, when in fact it is a statistical irrelevancy who you (and your phantom “millions”) decide to vote for, or whether you vote at all. So we all have to strain to fit ourselves into your spider-hole of a mind and beg for your understanding?

        You have three substantive choices on Nov 6, none of which matter much more than writing in Mystery Markowitz: vote Romney, vote Obama, or stay home. There are two outcomes to Nov 6: a President Romney or a President Obama. That binary outcome means all of your hair splitting on micro-issues is pointless. So your next step is to bitch about the binariness of the choice in some hotheaded distraction to forget your impotence.

        Even if you don’t know this psephological reality, the candidates do. They know you even better than you do when it comes to voting patterns, and because of your fickle fleeting notions and inch-thin rationales, they do not even bother to speak to your demographic, much less you personally. They know that if you are stupid enough to vote for Obama because of pornography then you are essentially a random element who is too unreliable to be worth wasting any time attempting to persuade. Especially when micromanaging your fragile sentiments would mean alienating the many more voters who haven’t overvalued their vote to the point of schizophrenia.

        Matt

        Like


      • Granted, I think alphas will do alright no matter what, that’s basically what makes an alpha an alpha. Still, I don’t think there’s a contradiction between celebrating alphaness and bashing feminism for what it’s done…men have been sleeping with tons of women and having harems forever, and they’ll be doing it forever. What’s changed is that society now revolves more and more around what women say they want, instead of what they really want, and so we’re all living in essentially a society built on hypergamic, self-rationalizing BS.

        The issue is that social conservatism pines for a world that I don’t think ever really existed. Peel away the quasi-nostalgia for the mythical 1950’s and you’ll see that the past wasn’t anti-alpha, it just had more of a balance wherein you could be beta and do OK in life, but you could also be alpha and conquer as many women as you wanted (if you were able to).

        Again, I see where you’re coming from, but I think men in general did better back in the day because society hadn’t bought the lie that women are the equals of men.

        Like


  14. on October 4, 2012 at 2:09 pm dlsap@hotmail.com

    This whole Republicans are alpha and Democrats are beta is absurd. I think we have enough items for people here to foam at the mouth about about whether something is beta or not than in project your own political beliefs in this light. In other words, lets get back to talking about pussy, not calling your political opponents pussies to bask in the light of the echo chamber.

    Like


  15. Anybody debating immigration must know what’s in this video or they simply don’t know what the fuck they are talking about.

    Like


  16. So, I have to ask. Where would you prefer to be when the shit hits the fan? Near urban centers or somewhere remote?

    Like


    • I’ll bank on remoteness. Staying urban is wish-fulfillment fantasy: every tough guy in the manosphere thinks he’ll be Mad Max rolling with his posse over the corpses of the weak. In reality, FEMA and the National Guard take over, requisitioning fuel and trying out their fancy crowd control weapons. End of story.

      For anything worse, or for those not willing to live so nakedly under the boot just because we couldn’t man up to solve the yid/kaffir problem, the true survivors will be those who can set traps for small game, build fires, shoot straight, and be content with nothing but a few tattered, mildewed paperbacks and plenty of solitude.

      Like


      • there is nowhere remote enough

        Like


      • You’ve not been to upstate Maine? Any expanse of forest is suitable. This is why people get lost. The map is not the terrain.

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 5:04 pm gunslingergregi

        the american consolate found me in the sticks in indonesia

        Like


      • gunslslsligigjeri,

        I have no doubt ZOG could find anyone they choose. Point is they won’t come looking for small fish, and heavy, unmarked forest beats dodging cameras, drones, and kaffir cops in the city.

        Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 1:56 am gunslingergregi

        i have allready seen the reality of what happens uh
        you havin problem spelling but if shit hits the fan you will have no hope of surviving might as well believe in higher power and heaven and leave it at that there will be nothing you can do about what happens if it does

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 5:05 pm gunslingergregi

        but yea maybe way off the main road and out of flight paths

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 5:06 pm gunslingergregi

        but in iraq it was the countryside and those living alone that were obliterated
        along with some towns but capital was pretty much still intact along with saddams houses

        Like


      • on October 4, 2012 at 5:13 pm gunslingergregi

        allthough prob good strategy kill all the farmers the cities starve and you control all imports to country and can import food so you the man of the hour

        Like


      • I’m choosing the coast of Alabama. Good soil, lots of water, beaches, easy winters, and lots of good country people living there.

        Like


    • Do a little experiment, find a map of all nuclear power plants and draw about a 30 miles circle around each (that is bare absolute minimum). Now find chemical factories and other hazardous sites, draw a little smaller circle etc.

      Collapse of civilization in today’s world will be nothing like before, it will be rather ugly endgame for humanity.

      Like


  17. http://www.inquisitr.com/352807/the-loser-of-last-nights-debate-jim-lehrer/

    In the clip Romney’s cadence is choppy and fast, his arguments seemed irritated and reactive to things Obama said and he appeared flustered by Lehrer. Obama was calm and focused. Many said he was too relaxed. Laconic, aloof perhaps?

    Obviously they’re both super alphas but I’m not seeing how Romney out alpha’d Obama in the debate.

    Like


    • Exactly. Obama paused before he spoke (alpha), had a deep register (alpha), and maintained demeanor in the face of shit testing (alpha).

      Romney was the more emotional, which is a sign of betadom: he seemed like an eager little puppy at times. However, he did control the frame more often.

      Like


    • frame is god

      Like


    • Stop sock-puppeting.

      Like


    • You better tell Bill Mahr about that, even that ultra-leftie criticized Hussein’s performance.

      Like


      • It’s a lefty ploy. If they sense weakness in their own, they re-orient so they can support the next “savior.” There is no loyalty in the lib-sphere.

        Like


    • on October 4, 2012 at 3:38 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Can we make it a rule that if you comment on who’s more Alpha you also have to state your political leaning. I’m pretty sure there isn’t a lot of objectivity going around with regards to that.

      Like


      • I’m just to the right of Darth Vader…

        But I don’t vote, which is why you’ll never find me arguing election politics or championing any politico.

        Like


    • Obama is “super alpha” in name only. He achieved stature through white guilt, and until last night, was not challenged a single time on his cushy, express journey up the cursus honorum.

      It would take a college course to point out the many ways Romney reduced Obama to beta peevishness and self-protective maneuvering. But begin by watching with the sound off and study the body language — Romney relaxed, composed, aggressive, unfazed; Obama shrinking, defensive, avoiding eye-contact, and even at times nervous (!). The only factor that saved BHO from meltdown was his arrogance, which is the single (unearned) tool he has in his otherwise empty alpha toolbox. By itself, shallow narcissism is manipulated easily by a true alpha on the offensive, and Romney took advantage.

      It also doesn’t help that Obama is attempting to sell an essentially feminine/beta political philosophy. It can be sold through alpha tactics — as Bill Clinton, who schooled him at the DNC, has demonstrated over the last twenty years — but BHO’s alpha attitude isn’t reliable enough to separate form from content.

      Look, a beta installed into an alpha post like the presidency is nothing like the betas at the bar. Though both types share the same small-souled attitude (see: Dreams from My Father), the former is used to getting flattered over nothing and begins interpreting his own beta traits as alpha virtues. And when they are publicly AMOG’ed, as Obama was last night, they don’t flip out or spaz or flee. Rather, they get confused — this wasn’t supposed to happen! David Axelrod said this wouldn’t happen!, then get angry, and then they smolder with resentment.

      By the end of his trials last night, Obama was too fatigued by his pummeling to enter the final stage of his meltdown: the pissy tantrum of the entitled whose status had just been forcibly removed from him. (Though, I am sure his advisers are privately getting the brunt of his bitchitude today.)

      If Romney plays his cards right, he will lean back in “amused mastery” in the second debate and pepper Obama with little jabs designed to bring about that tantrum. Obama needs to show off some alpha next time, and he can be baited into overcompensating aggression. Sure, he tried to be “aloof” in the first debate, but without earning that pose, an imposter quickly degenerates into the flailing of the cornered beta.

      Romney has earned his aloofness now — no one can mistake it for weakness because he demonstrated his strength last night. Obama suddenly has to perform for the first time in his life at the very highest level, sans prompter, sans PR shield, sans affirmative action résumé. That’s the problem with faking an aloof pose — in the absence of prior demonstration or impeccable reputation, it will come off indistinguishable from weakness, fatigue, or social dissociation to the point of autism. As it did last night.

      Matt

      Like


      • “Romney has earned his aloofness now ”

        Which he will spoil with pleading earnestness, a mask he put on to anticipate jibes about “the 47%” and that, but hasn’t the instinct to take off. Mark my word, Matt: he will drop this ball as suddenly as he picked it up.

        Like


      • I disagree. Romney also did well in the Republican debates and eventually smoked all of his opponents in them. Opie was a cake walk compared to newt Gingrich, for instance. Opie only has one more chance to get this right and he will fight dirty to win, which will also become obvious and betray his weakness. I always said Opie is a DL faggot Manchurian candidate. That’s how he looked last night too.

        Like


      • Excellent analysis. I plan to vote GOP except for prez, but it is quite satisfying to see the first white-guilt president having his lack of qualification laid bare for all to see.

        Like


      • Amen!

        Like


  18. “the dream of every girl to have a harem of eunuch beta male orbiters showering her with emotional support and money while demanding nothing in return”

    In other words, the premise and appeal of the show Friends.

    Like


  19. People in general vote for (who they believe to be) alpha males. It’s not just a single white woman thing. Very few people vote rationally, which is why all presidents have been tall and relatively good looking; especially after the advent of television.

    The first televised presidential debate was between Nixon and Kennedy. People who only listened to the debate generally thought Nixon won, but people who watched it generally thought Kennedy won. It’s probably no coincidence that the USAs president who was the biggest player (Kennedy) was the one who won

    Like


  20. The same arguments for denying women the vote can (and should) be used to deny men the vote. After all, male voters gave women the vote. Nonsense shibboleths about “Equality” created both male suffrage and female suffrage.

    Like


    • True dat.

      Like


    • The vote, (if given to anyone), should probably be restricted to those who are or who have been in the military. If you’re not willing to die for or kill for the country, you probably shouldn’t have any say in how it’s run.

      Like


    • The franchise must be (will be) restricted to the men with a stake in the future of the republic. Not only property owners, but parents, taxpayers, capital investors, veterans, and those with a demonstrable commitment to integrity of the public weal. In short, the citizens who have invested their blood, sweat, time, and treasure into the republic.

      Everyone else, STFU.

      Otherwise we get plebeian scum voting themselves security at the expense of the general liberty, every time.

      A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury. After that, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits with the result the democracy collapses because of the loose fiscal policy ensuing, always to be followed by a dictatorship, then a monarchy.

      — Alexander Tytler, possibly apocryphal

      The United States was fortunate to have a massive reserve of “noblesse” to allow “the crows to peck the eagles” for a half-century. But this reserve is dwindling.

      The Senate/House, Lords/Commons, Patrician/Pleb distinctions, attached to a culture of noblesse oblige, is the only way republics have ever functioned. There is a steady pull toward Jacobinism among the rabble which must be ferociously resisted in the manner of Shakespeare’s Coriolanus.

      My nobler friends, I crave their pardons:
      For the mutable, rank-scented many, let them
      Regard me as I do not flatter, and
      Therein behold themselves: I say again,
      In soothing them, we nourish ‘gainst our senate
      The cockle of rebellion, insolence, sedition,
      Which we ourselves have plough’d for, sow’d, and scatter’d,

      By mingling them with us, the honour’d number,
      Who lack not virtue, no, nor power, but that
      Which they have given to beggars.

      Not only haven’t we resisted the “common cry of curs! whose breath I hate / As reek o’ the rotten fens, whose loves I prize / As the dead carcasses of unburied men / That do corrupt my air”; our elites have castrated themselves and joined the rabble’s cause. “Mingl[ed] them with us.” So the decadence must accelerate until an aristocracy can be refashioned and refit to its proper function in the preservation of a republic. That begins with repealing the nineteenth of course (pretty please, Maya, will you let us?), but it doesn’t end until the spirit of republicanism displaces the growing, seething mobocracy more generally.

      It would be impossible to reverse the classical cycle of decline if the U.S. didn’t have unique and substantial traditions in its favor, most particularly its unabashed Christianity — which ennobles the lowly and creates Patrician restraint over Plebeian urges at the individual level. “God mend thine ev’ry flaw / Confirm thy soul in self-control / And liberty in law.”

      Matt

      Like


    • Yeah, true, universal male suffrage begat universal suffrage. I agree with Churchill when he said that the best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

      Like


  21. Plus we are SECOND place to china, WE ARE GONNA LET THOSE LITTLE DICK MOTHERFUCKERS BEAT US?! OH HELL NO!! I’M VOTING MIT ROMNEY.

    Like


  22. It’s insightful to see the transformation of these “pinko liberal” women once they have a boyfriend, husband or male offspring of their own and replace the surrogate government father.

    Romney won’t do well with these latte drinking, tofu eating yoga freaks since they are subconsciously jealous of Ann Romney for having a faithful husband with a healthy and “happy” family, which is old school alpha while Obama is new age alpha. It’s difficult for these women to leave their hive collective singlehood and vote Republican, especially when other idiot Republicans are talking about banning abortion too.

    Romney also doesn’t have the “bad boy” edge that George W. Bush had with his brief national guard experience, DUI and cocaine habits.

    However, these is slight hope for Romney after decidedly winning the debate since Americans despise losers. If Paul Ryan and Romney win the rest of the debates then it’ll become a much closer race.

    Like


    • Good comment. Useful point to make against women in conversation: Single white women leaned Obama; married white women, Romney.

      However, he has not the shadow of a chance against the rising tide of color + whiteskin daddy-damaged bitch traitors.

      Like


  23. Someone also needs to look into marriage satisfaction and women’s voting preference.

    Like


  24. In other words, I predict that a good percentage of politicians or even presidents 30-40 years from now will have had some PUA training. As long as they have the outward ‘superficial’ alpha traits like height and good posture.

    Like


  25. Women voting for Gimmedats is not a universal phenomenon: in the UK an France, women vote more conservatively than men.
    You ought to ask yourselves what it is about American women who makes them crave Gimmedats.

    BTW is The State really a surrogate alpha male? I’d think it’s more like a surrogate beta provider. (See also the addendum.)

    Like


    • Probably because the European right is less occupied with “culture wars”, gays, abortion etc., And more about “protecting you from being raped by a dangerous immigrant”

      Like


      • Good point but British women voted Conservative consistently during the last century, except for the handsome Tony Blair, certainly more alpha than his rivals. Not sure about the last election though.
        In answer to Corvinus below I don’t have stats, I read this on The Economist.

        As for French women, their vote might have something to do with Frenchmen’s tendency to philander, so if there are more PUAs in the US maybe the female vote can be shifted rightwards.

        Like


      • I wonder what is the male/female breakdown of votes for more genuinely conservative candidates in the US; like Ron Paul or Pat Buchanan?

        From what I hear from France, it doesn’t look like the VERY socially conservative, supposedly “anti women” (newspeak for anti progtard feminists) Islamists are fairing ay worse amongst Muslim women than muslim men. And ditto amongst VERY socially conservative FLDS members closer to home.

        Hence, I have a hard time buying that women in and of themselves are wired for being liberals. Instead, I suspect the reason for the degeneration of the West, has more to do with lazy parents handing their daughters over to opportunistic alphas in politics, who, of course, do their best to program their newfound chattel to promote their own continued rein.

        Like


      • I have a few issues with your comment but for now just one question.

        FLDS? wtf is that?

        Like


      • From the New Hampshire primary exit polls: Paul beat Romney among 18-29 year old white females (the GOP primary was 99% white voters) by 37% to 32%. But even among total non-married white women, Romney still beat Paul 36% to 30%. Romney pretty much won every other age, income, education, and married/unmarried brackets among white women. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2012/new-hampshire-primary-jan-10/exit-polls

        Like


      • I wonder what is the male/female breakdown of votes for more genuinely conservative candidates in the US; like Ron Paul or Pat Buchanan?

        Buchanan was back in the 1990s, so I can’t remember, but Ron Paul was still favored more by men. Young women like Paul more than other Republicans, but still favor Obama over Paul, while young men favor Paul, even those who prefer Obama over Romney.

        Like


    • Women voting for Gimmedats is not a universal phenomenon: in the UK an France, women vote more conservatively than men.

      Stats, please?

      You ought to ask yourselves what it is about American women who makes them crave Gimmedats.

      Because they’re emotional, and liberal arguments are catnip to people who only think (if it can be called such) emotionally. It’s also interesting how getting married makes them vote GOP.

      Among young whites, the men were mostly for Ron Paul when he was running, and the women for Obama.

      Like


  26. Pretty sure women are voting for Obama because the Republicans keep making stupid statements/attempting to make stupid laws regarding rape, abortion, and birth control. They are shooting themselves in the foot with that stuff if they want women to vote for them.

    I doubt many people are actually sexually attracted to Obama. Politicians are the opposite of sexy.

    Like


    • You underestimate the power of sexual conflict between white men and women. They will vote for the half-caste as the biggest shit-test in history aimed at men of their own race.

      But, you’re right, the Republicans’ insufficient love of baby-murder is a virtuous failing.

      Like


    • Women do love baby killing.

      Like


    • Ah, the republican ‘war on women’. Republicans complain about paying for their contraceptives (and then apologize for it), therefore they’re ‘warring against women’. What do these same women have to say about Islam? *crickets*

      If this isn’t proof of the subjective solipsism of women, I don’t know what is.

      Like


      • As my friend likes to say, a real war on women would last five hours.

        Like


      • Their sewing must be lacking if it would take them that long to fashion yellow-tinted white flags out of their soiled panties.

        Like


      • But… but… but… Uma Thurman and Angelina Jolie and Lucy Liu and (whoever) have proven that THEY can kiss men’s asses, ten to one.

        Like


      • Women are not the problem. They are sujugated in afghanistan without opposing the slightest form of organized resistance. Their manboobed sycophants are the problem.
        It’s hard to declare a war against half the “men” of your country.

        Like


    • I don’t need the government to pay for my birth control. I don’t want the government funding free abortions, nor do I want girls not old enough to drive to be able to have one without telling their parents. I don’t believe that a woman should have free reign to decide what quantifies “rape” to the point where she can have the government punish a man she regrets sleeping with. That, to me, is the government exercising control of my reproductive system. The Democrats, not the Republicans, are waging this war on women.

      Like


  27. I love Gimmedats as a synonym for N Words.

    Like


    • Looks like alphie gets ass-smacked yet again… the fun is wearing thin, though.

      Like


    • Called what, exactly.

      Like


    • Not a very good response, whorefinder — it was utterly lacking in the usual barrage of self-hating racial denigrations.

      Go back and practice at whorefinder academy. Or just keep beating up black prostitutes.

      Don’t say you haven’t, either.

      Like


      • Not a very good response,
        —SWPL judgment doesn’t affect my world view.

        it was utterly lacking in the usual barrage of self-hating racial denigrations.
        —Depends. Are you black? Please say so—it would explain your stupidity.

        Or just keep beating up black prostitutes.
        —If only it were legal to go a ‘noosing again….

        Like


  28. You know how they say that it’s masculine and dominant to express differences of opinion with women on a date? Well, you still need to be careful what you say (unfortunately). This is particularly true if you read a lot of political blogs which develop controversial positions.

    I was on a date with this chick once and I was telling her about this article I read about mega clubs in las vegas and how fake they are. And she got up in a huff and said “I love las vegas.” As if I had offended her mother. This is a girl who says on her OKC profile that she loves Disneyland.

    There’s only so far I’m willing to go to appease a woman. But apparently, this concept of expressing disagreement, comes with certain caveats.

    Like


  29. All politicians are by definition beta. They subjugate themselves for votes and money and do the bidding of more powerful interests. Well really that makes them prostitutes, but either way they deserve our contempt. They don’t deserve my vote though; I’ve got more important things to do than participate in the meaningless fiction of democracy.

    Like


  30. Sluts want everything for free.

    There’s a reason healthy societies shun sluts.

    Heck, in the Mid-East, they stone these whores to death publicly. Seems like a better idea each day.

    Like


    • Problem is, at no time in the West did that happen. There was public shaming, especially in Mediterranean and Catholic countries, but no stoning or execution by any means.

      Point being: at least among Celtic and Germanic tribes, there’s always been a potential for female will-to-power to be unleashed. Englishmen let go of the reins and Jews took them up.

      Like


      • Shaming I’m talking about.

        Yes, Europe regrettable didn’t pick up on the mid eats-stoning of sluts, but at least we have the legacy of the Scarlet Letter.

        Like


      • Which merely became yet another stick to beat us about the head with… a symbol of white patriarchy hypocrisy… hear the herald cry: THE SLUT IS INNOCENT!!!

        Like


      • Exactly. Which is why when they try to push you towards their idiotic worldview, you push back twice as hard.

        Every woman who complains about slut shaming should be stoned to death.

        Solves the problem very quickly, don’t you think?

        Like


      • In Greece at least, there were definitely widow killings. And not even that long ago.

        Like


    • yeah the middle east really has it figured out. Nice thinking.

      Like


      • They have. They keep their bitches in line and wanting them more.

        Nothing is more vicious that a Mid Eastern woman demanding Sharia. Those bitches know the glorious pussy drippings of crawling before men.

        And news flash, lefty: Islam is kicking US ass at every embassy. Why? Because we have a SWPL-nigger president, and they aren’t afraid of him.

        Like


      • “And news flash, lefty: Islam is kicking US ass at every embassy. Why? Because we have a SWPL-nigger president, and they aren’t afraid of him.”

        Best statement I heard all day.

        Like


      • Except, these homos and child-molester Islamic men don’t inspire the pussy to drip. It sticks shut.

        Like


      • I disagree.

        Go back to the 1920s and watch the classic Rudolph Valentino movie “The Sheik.”

        Though Valentino was an obvious fag, women were gaga over this film and him as a controlling Arab sand prince.

        And 50 shades of gray is nothing more than middle eastern harem dreams for a woman.

        Like


      • I don’t think they knew Rudolph Valentino was a fag, and besides he looked so debonair in it, nothing like how real Muslim men are in reality. Anyway, I don’t think fags inspire sexual arousal in women. Think about it. An actor can be so hot/masculine but the moment he comes out of the closet his star starts falling; he is no longer a heartthrob. That’s why many don’t come out.

        I have to say, I don’t enjoy watching a male-female love scene with an actor I know is gay no matter how good looking he is. I just can’t suspend my disbelief, and I know many women feeling the same, even if they accept homosexuality as normal.

        Again, I meant the pussy sticking-shut comment as a joke. I meant to say I hate Arab/Muslim men, and I don’t find them attractive no matter how much “alpha” qualities they try to emit. Just Yuck!

        Like


      • Well, they’re entitled to force it open. Win: Muslim men.

        Like


    • on October 4, 2012 at 5:19 pm gunslingergregi

      real pay as you go ho’s are about the closest you can come to equal to a man

      Like


  31. on October 4, 2012 at 4:31 pm gunslingergregi

    that doesn’t make sense whorefinder sluts are by definition bringing something to the table

    chicks who pop out the required 3 kids then chill want everything for free and are giving nothing back

    Like


  32. on October 4, 2012 at 4:32 pm gunslingergregi

    well ok i guess they are producing the future drug dealers so thats something i guess

    Like


  33. on October 4, 2012 at 4:33 pm gunslingergregi

    and using their medical card to visit the hospital at the slightest sign of sniffle cause they don’t have to pay for it and don’t care

    Like


  34. Thanks for the kind words Heartiste. I love Sailer, his work has opened my eyes, I think this aspect (single White women) has been overlooked. In my view the restoration of the American people and Republic will come by a social movement, emphasizing taking over the failed state’s duties (physical protection, banking, schooling, health care) and sheltering small holders from an aggressive taxation/seizure regime. Think how the Muslim Brotherhood replaced the state and corruption with the social services, and had a deniable intimidation arm. Single women are not up for a street fight, it is their one weakness. China now has violent strikes because men are the dominant factory workers.

    Like


  35. on October 4, 2012 at 5:00 pm PUA is a way of life

    WTF is a “showy self-annihilation of pathological altruism”? That doesn’t make any sense. Whoever writes this blog is a pseudo-intellectual phony who uses a thesaurus in order to look smart, even when he obviously isn’t.

    Like


    • The expression makes perfect sense. I don’t see what you’re complaining about.
      And you could start using a thesaurus too. When you’re done sucking dicks that is.

      Like


      • The entire quote, which provides context for the offensive phrase was;

        “Single women are the worst teat sucklers because it is in the nature of women, before they have had their estrogenic rocket fuel burned out of them by marriage and children, to extract as many resources from the tribe’s public pot as they can manage, and to dispense as much of the public till to sympathetic groups in a showy self-annihilation of pathological altruism.”

        The first part about dispensing the public till obviously refers to single women’s known prediliction to favor groups that dispense government cheese. The second part is a wordy way of saying that the behavior referenced in the first part accomplishes too things; 1) it is showy, in that it helps these single women prove their moral worth, and 2) self-annihilation, in that it inevitably leads to moral and social degradation. There was also a link to a book in the words “pathological altruism”, which discusses “a number of new, thought-provoking theses that explore a range of hurtful effects of altruism and empathy”, as well as “a disparate slew of humankind’s most troubled features, including genocide, suicide bombing, self-righteous political partisanship, and ineffective philanthropic and social programs that ultimately worsen the situations they are meant to aid.”

        God damn it, if I can figure this out in about three seconds of thinking and the clicking of one link, it probably shouldn’t be too hard for others…

        Now go eat a dick.

        Like


      • In figuring it out, you missed the oblique reference to white women’s patronage of non-whites and gays.

        Good pro-kaffir reframe, bro.

        Like


  36. Americans are “Komische Leute” as they would say here. Capture in the mental masturbation and unable to see that Romney as well as Obama are the practically the same, their voting record shows and both are out to screw you, either from the “Left” or the “Right”.

    Like


  37. Yeah girls are dumb sluts because they favor Obama. Stupid fucking article. I remember why I stopped reading this blog. Heartiste has fallen off.

    Like


  38. I meant captured*

    Like


  39. “Nature has given women so much power that the law has very wisely given them little.” – Samuel Johnson.

    I don’t see any reason why any woman should be given the vote.

    Like


  40. Uh said: Name one thing invented by a Jew, or Jews, that has benefited white men.

    Zyklon B.

    Like


    • Haber (J) and Tesch (kraut) considered their colleague Heerdt (kraut) the true inventor.

      Haber, of course, invented synthetic fertilizer, and with it the (non-white) population boom.

      Like


  41. I live in Berkeley. One of these days, I’m going to pick a girl up, and right before I’m about to cum riding her doggie style, lean over and whisper into her ear…

    “I loved for George W. Bush.”

    And then just punch her in the back of the head as hard as I can.

    Like


    • Please post the video if that happens.

      Like


    • on October 5, 2012 at 1:16 am Mr. Pointyface

      Why, that would be so clever and heroic!! Especially knowing it would fuck up her sex life for years . You, know, it’s about time men started REAL retaliation for their failures. I hereby proclaim you the winner of the CHARM SCHOOL award.

      Like


      • More snark from the pseudo-man. If you would learn to just state your point without the feminine sarcasm, maybe we’d have some respect for you. (But I wouldn’t hold my breath.)

        Like


      • Respect for Jason’s sock puppet?
        (or it may be his wife… this latest post’s tone shows it’s probably a woman)

        Let’s not go crazy now.

        Like


      • You would sympathize if you lived in Berkeley. Heinous town.

        Like


  42. We should go back to the system that allowed the vote to those who owned land. Only alpha winners owned land.

    Like


    • Nah, that will only radicalize lefties, and they will bitch whine even more about the rich and powerful.

      Even if I don’t like women’s suffrage, married individuals should be the only ones able to vote, and fags are not individuals. It’s slightly more marketable than stripping women from their rights, but it won’t happen unless the country collapses and a red-pilled strong leader emerges.

      Wait, scratch that. It will never happen. We will most likely collapse and the muslim overlords will rule hispanics, since whitey will be long gone.

      Like


    • I am with Robert Heinlein on this one. Only honorably discharged or retired vets can vote or hold office.

      Like


      • RH was a pimp.

        Like


      • Ya… Starship Troopers should be required reading in every junior high school.

        The eye-candy attempted satire of the novel movie version, eh… not so much.

        Like


      • I liked the co-ed shower scene and the “clean utopia” sets of Paul Verhoeven sci-fi movies. I know some don’t like the movie version, but I did. I’d like to live in a city like they had, when in school in the beginning of the movie, the house Casper Van Dien’s character’s parents lived in, etc. It depicts an idealized future.

        Like


      • As I said… eye-candy.

        The movie was a guilty pleasure, but the book is something that youth should read, instead of the interminably Catcher In The Rye/To Kill A Mockingbird type of downers.

        Like


      • I think this should be one of several criteria. Marriage, children, and property ownership as well.

        Like


      • The more criteria, the better. Let’s have a 463 point checklist. The fewer (and better) voters the more they’ll feel their vote means something and the more likely they’ll do their due diligence on politics.

        Like


  43. I noticed a long time ago any political or public policy group made up of mostly women, be it right, left or other always pushes for bigger government. Ex. NOW, Concerned Women for America, MADD.

    Like


    • Amen! I’ve also learned with most lefties, it’s as simple as the desire for a government job. For the leadership, it’s stealth communism. But face it, what else can most women do? If government didn’t support their employment, by creating mountains of economically useless jobs, most would still be housewives.

      Like


  44. Single white 20-something girl here… and Obama, to me, is the ultimate beta. And not sexually appealing in any sense of the word. And a bad, bad choice for president. I can’t deny that we vote with our lady parts, though. I mean, isn’t that the only thing the Dems think we’re capable of caring about?

    Like


  45. Heartiste, a-fucking-men. Great post! Fucking nailed it. I think I will learn to admire Sam Francis. Anarcho-tyrany: great word. And I learned that women as a group become at-all politically responsible under the proper bonds of matrimony even when able to act anonymously or autonomously. Who knew?

    Maybe women don’t suck at politics as completely as I thought. I never got married, and doubt I ever will at this point. I would expect any (dangerous) she-child to pledge to ‘honor and obey’ me, or forget it. For the record to the stupid people, I am not delusional, thinking I would get such a vow. I eschew marriage, but back in the day…could have been something special.

    What train wrecks liberated white women become by their 30s. (I recently dated one and she was every sick cliche. This alpha poonfest is not working for me, obviously not ‘alpha’, and I doubt most men here are pulling it in as advertised. I find myself lowering my standards more and more with this market (Western zeitgeist and hick locale), trying to get some momentum/experience. *nausea* Hoping hot, childless she-childs make it worth it, but I’m mid-40s and loosing daylight. I’d rather be living life built to my standards.) This ride can’t hit bottom too soon for my taste.

    If Obama does not win this round, he’s still eligible, more so with time, and if he is still popular and servicable in 2016 or 2020…expect Ado-Grover Hit-Cleveland. He might be better off waiting if he want to be Da Leader we apparently must elect. I think who-sane wants to ‘transform America’ more than he wants to be president, and he is merely high middle management to make banksters happy.

    Like


    • Expect a Latino candidate on either side in 2016 probably, or 2020 certainly. Mayhap that by then both will field one.

      Like


  46. “How does this change the argument of those wanting a return to the gold standard? yhoo.it/RE3yUJ”

    Well it doesn’t. Purifying gold chloride, which is in as tight a supply as pure gold is not the same as creating gold from scratch. And whether one believes them or not, the researchers claim that it’s not cost-effective.

    And few really advocate an absolute gold standard. Most self-declared gold bugs prefer a mix of precious metals and commodities as a standard economic unit of account.

    But hey, even an endangered gold is preferable to a bernankified fiat money.

    Like


    • Competing currencies is what enlightened anarcho-capitalists want. Gold could be one, and lose favor to something else if or when a development like this inflated its supply.

      Like


  47. Glamorizing the past is just plain moronic. Do you really think you’d be better off living in a time when infant mortality rates were sky-high and there was no mass-communication? Also, odds are you’d be working on a farm or at a factory seven days a week.

    Social Conservatism is just pointless. In a few orbits around the sun, you’ll be something described by history teachers to get a laugh out of their kids. The guy in the 20’s who thinks dresses that show ankles are scandalous. The guy in the 60’s who wants interracial marriage banned and thinks stores being open on Sunday is sacrilegious. Today’s knuckle-draggers fighting for the rights of incognizant fetuses and trying to “defend traditional marriage”.

    It’s amusing how desperate the GOP is. They’ve got the dying old white man vote down pat. Now they’re fretting over how to win over anyone else. That’s what happens when you beat a drum about social issues instead of doing what you’re good at: appealing to people who want to keep more of their paycheck. The party -could- be saved and revitalized by Libertarian millennials but odds are that regressive baby boomers will drag it into their graves with them.

    Like


    • ZZZ. What a bunch of straw men. Removing the right to vote for people who clearly hate freedom (women) does not equal the desire to undo advancements in science and medicine. Stop being a tool and open your eyes.

      Like


  48. “It’ll be interesting to see if the polls budge among women in favor of Romney because he looked like a boss disciplining a lackadaisical employee during the debate. Obama’s head nodding while Romney dressed him down was a huge beta tell, and women pick up on that subtle body language stuff. If they are sufficiently turned off, this election could be up for grabs.”

    Romney came across like a loving but stern father to most people watching. Personally, I believe it’s what every girl needs and thirsts for. If Romney can continue on this path while Obama looks like the incompetent juvenile thinker he is, this election could turn (maybe). lol today Obama explained Romney’s performance as a fake. He said it wasn’t the real Romney on stage last night. Like I said, real childish and immature. He can’t even come up with a viable explanation for his poor performance last night. I think women subconsciously pick on such subtleties, in which case Obama will promise more free goodies like Obama dollars and Obama phones, which have already made their way to the streets of America. Bribery has long been a liberal tactic to get votes. That’s why I say maybe.

    Like


    • While I think Obama’s debate performance was awful, he did have a point in calling Romney a fake. Romney backed away from almost every position he’s held over the course of his campaign. It’s natural for politicians to head to the center when the primary is over, but his recent flip-flopping rivals that of Kerry in 2004.

      Like


    • I think a lot of women will switch. He is seen as sexy and the model father and husband by many. That has to resonate with all those 30+ single women out there. Moreover, he came across as sincere and I think its convincing. My wife is fond of him for these reasons. She’s always joking about how I should be as virtuous as Mitt Romney! He looks uncannily like Ward Cleaver. His wife looks less like June, but still there’s enough resemblance there. Romney’s also taller and people saw that. Historically, the tallest man wins each election, I believe. There’s certainly a correlation. Romney came across as reasonable and sensible. There’s a lot of sour grapes in the Obama campaign right now. Read the NYT comments. The head photo on Drudge is also priceless. Moochelle has this look of anger on and disgust on her face. Opie looks shocked and clueless and very beta. Opie got reemed last night. Moochelle beat that scrub ass last night. Romney is smiling at the podium while Opie and Miss Opie took their bows. It’s a great photo.

      Like


    • Mitts problem is that he runs from his own money and success instead of playing it up.

      What we need is a black Mitt Romney. Then all his wealth and success would work for him.

      Like


  49. Problem is, from the ‘traditional’ standpoint of alpha vs. beta, Romney should be the aloof, devil-may-care alpha and Obama the ‘provider’ boring beta, due to the stereotype that Dem politics == nanny state.

    Something else is at work here.

    Like


  50. As we hurtle towards the fempocalypse the restless idealogues argue about what shade of brown to paint the baseboards on the Titanic. Obromney is just another illusion to make you believe there’s a choice and that your opinions matter.

    We don’t need an election, we need guillotines.

    Like


  51. Women must be subjugated. All else is folly.

    There will be blood.

    Like


  52. To use an old cliche, this election amounts to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Western civ has already hit the iceberg, and is going down. A new captain won’t make a difference.

    Like


  53. If Obama gets in again, the US will become an economic Jonestown.

    Like


  54. The electoral power of women is amplified by the age distribution of likely voters. Old people are more likely to vote than young people. And because women tend to live longer than men, there are more old women than old men. In fact, old women are the most powerful demographic voting bloc. Smart politicians know this, which is why they cater to the concerns of old women.

    Ironically, it is the women who are invisible to men who have the most voting power. Even if an alpha male politician can give gina tingles to young women, the old women will vote him out of office if he dares to meddle with Social Security or Medicare.

    Like


    • And that’s why I’m saying everybody must die. The human species must go extinct.

      Death, bitches.

      Obama 2012.

      Like


  55. I enjoy your game posts but all the harpingg about illegals and Latins make you sound like a whiny bitch. As a Latino, American citizen, raised in NYC I can frankly state nothing that immigrants are doing America even comes close, not even remotely, to what your stupid American, fat, entitled, superficial, materialistic, garbage, culture is doing to the rest of the world. I’ve chosen to leave the US because it is horrible place, with easily the worst women in the world. But every place i go, i see your shit culture invading and polluting once feminine, sweet, nice women. Im In Brazil now, and it is changing fast, and one by one i see countries becoming more like MINE and YOURS, yes like THE FUCKING U.S…..So fuck your bitching about THEM coming to the US. Trust me i could write volumes bitching about YOUR SHIT CULTURE going everywhere…saying please keep your FB, iphones, movies, masculine attitude women, tattoos, no children having, no cooking ever, femcunts, everything…except it is your fault your country is that way, only YOU fucking gringos deserve them and your country.
    Yes, im glad to leave and i’m sure you are glad im gone, but i feel sad you choose to stay in that shithole😛 Actually, not really, one less gringo here in Latin America makes me happy. Have fun chatting politics with you late 20’s and 30 americacunts…while im banging 18 year olds all over the world.
    Please stick to game and stop bitching.
    Peace

    Like


    • I honestly can’t disagree.
      Whites dug their own grave. Maybe they were manipulated by jews, maybe not. Either way, we lost without even fighting.

      Like


    • Don’t worry Taco, I’ll only set foot in your shitty Latin America for tourism to bang the hottest broads that’ll jump me just because I’m American. Funny if your continent wasn’t so shitty, you wouldn’t have to leave there in the first place.

      Besides the Carnival? WTF does Latin America as a culture have collectively to be proud of?

      Cocaine, gangs, re-gay-tton and… more tacos?

      Like


    • on October 5, 2012 at 2:05 am gunslingergregi

      and if people don’t copy us we kill em yea it is sad

      Like


    • Good post. This is what so many WNs on this blog have never understood.

      American feminism is being exported in pirated films and poison TV series like Sex and the City and Gossip Girls. It’s ruining other cultures including the last remaining all white cultures that have been birthing higher than the replacement rate until the effect of the poison set in.

      And we’re not talking about the sexual revolution here. The guy above didn’t complain about pre-marital sex being available for himself. Foreign men tend to agree in conversations with me that it’s just that there needs to be a significant class of well-bred women getting married and having babies while young. They need to understand basic Evo Psych.

      Like


      • That last paragraph makes me want to make a point. Well bred woman don’t want to marry and have babies with men who have been slumming it with everything and anything. No woman is seriously expecting a virgin but there’s defiantly a line at which you become a manslut/trash dick whatever you want to call it.

        Like


    • One out of fifty-million goes back (probably not for good).

      I’m hanging streamers over here.

      Like


  56. If I didn’t want to fuck them so much, I probably wouldn’t have anything to do with them.

    Like


  57. In addition to all the status-whoring and what not, enormous numbers of single white women are employed directly or indirectly by the state at all levels.

    Try this. Go to Match.com or whatever dating site and look what the single wimmins list as jobs. Teacher, teacher, something medical (non doctor), teacher, NGO, fund-raiser, charity, teacher, teacher, “the arts” (gov funded at every level), teacher, teacher. Even when they are lawyers, mostly it’s lawyer for some government agency or “immigrants rights” or some damn thing funded by the government. Cutting back on the Leviathan State means eliminating jobs for single women, plain and simple.

    Like


  58. Hey, guys. What’s going on?🙂

    Like


    • Busy boffing eve in the ass. Really a fucking smiley?

      The simple explanation for so many undersexed liberal women voting Obama is that they want his big black dick.

      Like


  59. I think that what has so far escaped analysis is the extent to which M. Romneys alpha-tude in the debate took people by surprise. He was never even half that good in previous outings. Why not?
    I have an idea; MR reminds me in some respects of several of my older male relatives. Most of the time these guys always tended to seem rather un-focused and un-driven, at least until their real goal(or prey) came close into their view and then they suddenly moved like a Lion in the final 15 yards of his approach to a fat, over-confident wart-hog.
    I mean, they would close their deals with an on-rush of focus and lethality that surprised nearly everyone who had thought they knew them well enough to relax in their presence. Maybe that is why I have a couple of trust funds.

    Like


  60. The comment of mine that is stuck now in moderation is Much, Much more mild, reasonable,, fair-minded,, law-abiding and less coated with high energy neutron emiiters than the thing I did not write ,and try to send -out of respect of our host.

    Like


  61. Romney’s gonna do pretty well among Latinos. Univision did an expose on Fast & Furious (the Obama administration program to give guns to Mexican drug gangs so leftists could argue for banning guns in the US because of violence in Mexico). The gringo media covered it up, but Obama has lost many Latinos because he got people killed in Mexico in a futile effort to ban guns here.

    This idea that Latinos will never vote for Republicans is simply delusional and borderline racist (and I hate accusations of racism, BTW). It just doesn’t make sense that they would go to such lengths to come to America and then decide to make it more like the place they left.

    Single women having the vote is unfortunate, but they will switch in the next few weeks. Romney is alpha, Obama is beta and that was made clear at the debate. When Romney succeeds, no Democrat will be able to get elected President for a generation and Republicans will control Congress for many years.

    Like


    • Latinos are interesting. As a half-white and historically Christian race, they vote for the GOP about one-third of the time, which is what one might expect.

      Unlike blacks, who, aside from a small portion of black men, vote for the Dems no matter how rotten things get.

      Like


      • Cubans are okay… capitalist, Christian, vote Republican… the rest.. meh.

        Like


      • Cubans actually impress me the least. They may be Republican, but they are ardent supporters of illegal immigration and are very jingoistic. They aren’t even that religious at all, with a very low Central European/East Asian birth rate.

        Like


      • Sometimes I meet the rare older Cuban businessman or lawyer who hates Castro and loves Franco, as one would predict. Beyond that, worthless scum population.

        Latrinos have no gratitude, no respect for us at all, a massive entitlement complex, are not our fucking friends, and if every one lined up tomorrow to vote GOP, they’d being doing it to favor themselves. They either actively want us gone, or wouldn’t blink if we suddenly disappeared tomorrow. They are adapted to lower standards which their own criollo class can recreate and maintain.

        How hard is this to undersand? Subspecies favor their own breeding pool and shit on the rest.

        Please no fucking talk of fifty-million Latrinos possibly being one-third our allies. Give me a break already. These are our fucking replacements.

        Like


      • We may outlast the Latino wave. Cuba and Puerto Rico are depopulating, while the birth rate of Mexicans in the U.S. crashed after the housing bubble burst. With any luck, they’ll all be reproducing like Spaniards within a few years.

        Like


      • We’re not talking about Cubans and Ricans. Eighty percent of our replacements (“immigration”) was Hispanic; over fifty percent was from Mexico. This is a Central American problem, not Caribbean — though Haitians, Jamaicans, and South Americans will continue flocking to Miami-Dade, and brother, it’s north and northwest after that.

        I repeat: the Latrinos will swallow us from the south, and the Chinese/Asians will from the north.

        We are finished. A remnant population. A bunch of whiteskin detritus ranging from deracinated self-seekers like Jason and deranged pill-poppers in white ghettos.

        Even if EVERY Latrino group plateaued TOMORROW, we would not resile from the slump and match their numbers before they exponentiate by all the anchor children that hatch here daily.

        I repeat: We are finished.

        Like


  62. I guess if I needed to make up a religion for white people, this would work pretty good.

    especially the part about black people being cursed:

    Like


    • As usual, thwack takes some atheist’s snark and propagates it as truth.

      South Park education in it’s truest form.

      Like


      • Greg, which part is false?

        Im not a Mormon, so some or all of it could be and I wouldn’t know it?

        But I stand by my original point. If I had to make up a sucessful religion for white people right now, it would look very similar to Mormonisn because it appeals to white peoples ego.

        Blacks are cursed and white people can be Gods and live forever…

        What more could a white person ask for in a religion?

        Like


      • Somehow through the flapping of your thick apelike gums, you’ve said something sensible:

        A new religion for whites would look like Mormonism.

        White girls want it but can’t deal with their gooey icky feelings stigmatized by feminist conditioning: check out the broads in the Portlands, in Boulder, Asheville, San Fran … they all want vegetable beds, community, knitting, pets (surrogates), cozy nests, etc.

        Ultimately this problem reduces to urbanism and its narcissistic allurements. Women aren’t capable of rationally choosing the true life (in which the ego is suppressed by the community) over the narcissistic life. Their true desires are still quite active, but the modern city provides surrogates for every want: box gardens for gathering, the rhetoric of ersatz urban “community”, pets again, etc.

        Anyway: that’s white people’s religion. My religion would involve much bloodletting. And enormous pyres.

        Like


      • Mormonism is Islam for white people (besides being Protestant Gnosticism). Muslims have their 72 virgins in paradise. Mormons have… well, you see.

        Like


    • Wait, you have a way lower IQ, are more violent, more anti-social, and fuck your half-sisters without knowing it, kill each other indiscriminately….and you’re not cursed?

      Nigger, please.

      Like


    • on October 5, 2012 at 8:03 am gunslingergregi

      wow that is some seriously powerfull game telling a woman she will be able to create tons of children throughout eternity
      gonna use it

      Like


  63. A debate occurred during the original and largely secret constitutional discussions of 1788-89 about whether the voting franchise should ever be extended to working men with jobs.
    The hard core said ” They will always just be puppets of their paymasters.No way they should vote. The Softer model Jefferson said “If you cannot stampede that group of hopeless brain dead proles to the Right Ballot boxes you deserve to lose/ Or die

    Like


  64. I did not kill heather. Maybe she died by accident in my arms.. Since we both had it coming…maybe you all should learn to f… off.

    Like


  65. Heartiste, one mistake you are making is lumping in all single-white women together. Are SWFs in Oklahoma voting the same way as they do in Rhode Island? In general, upbringing, surroundings, and culture count.

    Like


  66. I went to law school in a major blue city, so I know many young single educated women. They’re all pro-abortion and gay marriage, even the few Republicans among them. However, I don’t notice any great support of illegal immigrants or affirmative action among them (the white ones). They might support these things, but they certainly aren’t vocal about it. And as the Republican party needs to get higher and higher percentages of the white vote, it’s going to need to make more explicitly racial arguments on issues like immigration and affrmative action. While I don’t think conservative positions on these issues will necessarily attract white single women, I also don’t see them being an automatic turnoff. One reason for this is that white single women are still white. They want good jobs, they want to marry men with good jobs, and they want to live in safe, fun areas. Illegal immigration harms quality of life in so many ways that merely a different framing of the issue could attract more women to the cause.

    The main problem with immigration is the media. Anyone who doesn’t support full amnesty is a “rightwinger”. We need an alpha male to put media leftists in their place on the issue. Unfortunately, no one yet has the requisite courage.

    Like


    • Our language has been neutered. As Lee Atwater so un-couthily put it, you can’t go around screaming, “Nigger, nigger nigger!” anymore and expect the vote.

      Too many women isolated from black violence has led them to believe stories made up by blacks and black-sympathizers about racism. And the p.c. police have neutered anyone calling a nigger a nigger, and ansy study of black dysfunction being innate.

      Left-wing women don’t know the horrors of a world they seek, since they never lived it. The “oppressed” housewives of the 1950s saw niggers up close; lived through the Great Depression; and had the horror of WW2 and the new, terrifying Cold War upon them. They knew leftist evil first hand and ran into housewifery and conservatism happily.

      Like


      • on October 5, 2012 at 4:48 am Days of Broken Arrows

        And if women do experience violence from minorities, there are entire cartels of people to tell them those minorities aren’t at fault and it’s the white man’s “oppression” that’s the cause of it. Therefore, the SWPL mindset is locked further into place and taken even further away from reality.

        Like


      • The funny thing is that non-whites themselves know that game is a bunch of crap, they know white guilt is stupid they’re just unwilling to tell anyone because it helps them. SWPLs are basically the only people on the planet who don’t realize how ridiculous they look to everyone else…they try to excuse behavior among non-whites that those same communities expressly don’t excuse and want to get rid of.

        It’s interesting, I’ve searched through history and I cannot find any parallels to what’s happening today. Has any people in the whole of recorded history been so self-loathing and stricken by self-guilt? Has anyone ever sought to harm their own standing so thoroughly and for no reason? This SWPL “leave your privilege at the door!” thing is so exceptionally idiotic as to beggar belief.

        Like


      • I think the reason it’s unprecedented in history is because the ease of living is likewise unprecedented.

        Only a folk so totally oblivious to struggle and the fragility of this thin veneer we call ‘civilization’ would be able to mentally sublimate their own best interests… notice they don’t really physically put anything on the line… and as long as there’s a place to white flight to with a Starbucks nearby, they’ll continue along in the Caucasian equivalent of their “loved Egyptian night”.

        Like


      • Good points.

        Like


      • True. This wouldn’t happen in any environment but the most pampered and permissive. Any environmental selective pressure would end this in a single night. Again, witness how whites behaved in the New Orleans Superdome: the men formed protective rings around the women at night.

        We call it white-knighting, biologists call it mate-guarding.

        I, for one, would have told them that to expect to be quarantined from the rest of the huddled masses smacked of racism.

        Like


      • You’re looking in the wrong place.

        Forget history. Look into parasitic species which employ neurotoxins to control the behavior of their host species. (a href=”http://www.radiolab.org/2009/sep/07/”>Start here for an easy intro.)

        The parallels will knock you on your ass.

        I can distill the basic principles for you:

        – northern european whites are the most exogamous (non-consanguineous) people on earth
        – the trade-off was high conscientiousness / conscience / empathy pathways
        – jews are some of the most endogamous people on earth
        – the trade-off is lack of conscience for out-groups / sociopathy
        – one trait of sociopaths is mimicry / dissimulation
        – jews have reflected whites humanist conscience back at them while maintaining tribal mentality
        – whites, totally blinded by their own silly ‘goodness’, happily totentanz off the existential cliff, white castigating a statistical minority of whites for objecting

        The take-away parallel is that the neurotoxin is dopamine cascades, originating in the hypothalamus, triggered by the pleasure of patronizing non-whites and the self-effacement of an extended phenotype more adapted to “fairness” than any other race on the planet (and as corollary punishment of defectors from fairness [preferential negative treatment of other whites] ). White people are, literally, physically addicted to the warm fuzzies they induce in themselves when they defend aliens; “altruistic punishment” of other whites for daring to defend their interests against aliens, i.e. revenge, triggers another dopamine cascade from the dorsal striatum.

        Whites are in a self-defeating “wobbly H” between two reward centers of the brain, one promoting generosity, one promoting revenge. And because whites are still members of the same extended phenotype, though relatively exogamous, they are basically still in competition with each other for status and its rewards (intraspecific competition produces greater sexual dimorphism, hence bigger titties and larger cocks), which means they will turn on each other before turning on other subspecies.

        Basically then, defecting YKW have adapted to use European humanism against Europeans in their most recent act of >horizontal transmission over three millennia.

        Like


      • You’re looking in the wrong place.

        Forget history. Look into parasitic species which employ neurotoxins to control the behavior of their host species. (Start here for an easy intro.)

        The parallels will knock you on your ass.

        I can distill the basic principles for you:

        – northern european whites are the most exogamous (non-consanguineous) people on earth
        – the trade-off was high conscientiousness / conscience / empathy pathways
        – jews are some of the most endogamous people on earth
        – the trade-off is lack of conscience for out-groups / sociopathy
        – one trait of sociopaths is mimicry / dissimulation
        – jews have reflected whites humanist conscience back at them while maintaining tribal mentality
        – whites, totally blinded by their own silly ‘goodness’, happily totentanz off the existential cliff, white castigating a statistical minority of whites for objecting

        The take-away parallel is that the neurotoxin is dopamine cascades, originating in the hypothalamus, triggered by the pleasure of patronizing non-whites and the self-effacement of an extended phenotype more adapted to “fairness” than any other race on the planet (and as corollary punishment of defectors from fairness [preferential negative treatment of other whites] ). White people are, literally, physically addicted to the warm fuzzies they induce in themselves when they defend aliens; “altruistic punishment” of other whites for daring to defend their interests against aliens, i.e. revenge, triggers another dopamine cascade from the dorsal striatum.

        Whites are in a self-defeating “wobbly H” between two reward centers of the brain, one promoting generosity, one promoting revenge. And because whites are still members of the same extended phenotype, though relatively exogamous, they are basically still in competition with each other for status and its rewards (intraspecific competition produces greater sexual dimorphism, hence bigger titties and larger cocks), which means they will turn on each other before turning on other subspecies.

        Basically then, defecting YKW have adapted to use European humanism against Europeans in their most recent act of >horizontal transmission over three millennia.

        (reposting, open tag correction)

        Like


      • Thankfully this thread has run out of steam, but I am going to repost one that didn’t make it through for whatever reason, and in two parts — for those interested in getting the bottom of our problem:

        fauvist said — “I’ve seached through history and I cannot find any parallels to what’s happening today.”

        uh said —

        You’re looking in the wrong place.

        Forget history. Look into parasitic species which employ neurotoxins to control the behavior of their host species. (Start here for an easy intro.)

        The parallels will knock you on your ass.

        I can distill the basic principles for you:

        – northern european whites are the most exogamous (non-consanguineous) people on earth
        – the trade-off was high conscientiousness / conscience / empathy pathways
        – jews are some of the most endogamous people on earth
        – the trade-off is lack of conscience for out-groups / sociopathy
        – one trait of sociopaths is mimicry / dissimulation
        – jews have reflected whites humanist conscience back at them while maintaining tribal mentality
        – whites, totally blinded by their own silly ‘goodness’, happily totentanz off the existential cliff, while castigating a statistical minority of whites for objecting

        Like


      • (cont.)

        The take-away parallel is that the neurotoxin is dopamine cascades, originating in the hypothalamus, triggered by the pleasure of patronizing non-whites and the self-effacement of an extended phenotype more adapted to “fairness” than any other race on the planet (and as corollary punishment of defectors from fairness [preferential negative treatment of other whites] ). White people are, literally, physically addicted to the warm fuzzies they induce in themselves when they defend aliens; “altruistic punishment” of other whites for daring to defend their interests against aliens, i.e. revenge, triggers another dopamine cascade from the dorsal striatum.

        Whites are in a self-defeating “wobbly H” between two reward centers of the brain, one promoting generosity, one promoting revenge. And because whites are still members of the same extended phenotype, though relatively exogamous, they are basically still in competition with each other for status and its rewards (intraspecific competition produces greater sexual dimorphism, hence bigger titties and larger cocks), which means they will turn on each other before turning on other subspecies.

        Basically then, defecting YKW have adapted to use European humanism against Europeans in their most recent act of horizontal transmission over three millennia.

        Like


      • Knew a little white girl, old friend of mine, who was gang-raped in Brooklyn by “youth”.

        Told her, ok, so now you’ll be reconsidering your membership in the New Flat Earth Society, for sure.

        Nope. They weren’t to blame. And to be fair, they aren’t entirely: she’s a skank who chose to live in Brooklyn.

        Like


    • Zambo

      We need an alpha male to put media leftists in their place on the issue. Unfortunately, no one yet has the requisite courage.

      Why don’t you do it?

      Like


    • “However, I don’t notice any great support of illegal immigrants or affirmative action among them (the white ones). ”

      Not with Jews at their back.

      http://www.mybuyersremorse.com

      No, that isn’t a scam, it’s the website of the Republican Jewish Coalition, and the buyer’s remorse refers to Obama.

      “The main problem with immigration is the media”

      The real problem with immigration is that it has already reached critical mass: fifty-million Latrinos alone, leaving out the refugees from Africa, the Middle East, the millions of Asians, Pacific Islanders, and any I’ve missed.

      The real problem with the media is the Jews who own and script it. Understand yet?

      Like


    • @zambo… “We need an alpha male to put media leftists in their place on the issue. Unfortunately, no one yet has the requisite courage.”

      We do have one. Her name is Gov. Jan Brewer🙂

      Like


      • Unmistakeable sign of End Times… our women fight like men, and our men like women.

        Like


      • It’s not unprecedented…Napoleon called Princess Marie-Therese the only man of her family because she refused to flee France when Napoleon returned from exile.

        Anyway, I don’t think modern women fight like men…they sucker omegas and betas into doing most of the heavy lifting, though they do celebrate as victors when it’s all over. If those leashed men ever get wise, it’s all over for feminism.

        Like


  67. women did not win the right to vote, that’s generalizing and misogynistic, there were women who lost the fight to not vote.

    and even saudi arabia has granted female suffrage, while the first elections were held there in 2004.

    http://endofwomen.blogspot.in/2012/10/a-lesson-from-herstory-voting.html

    Like


  68. on October 5, 2012 at 1:04 am gunslingergregi

    any blacks ever get stopped from posting on this site thinking not bro

    Like


  69. There is a reason the Founding Fathers did not give women the vote. A shame we can’t revoke it now after all the damage done.

    Like


    • I think someone in the manosphere is going to have to spend a lot of time going over the history of women’s suffrage and how bad an idea it was, and why men never gave women the right to vote initially.

      From a masculine point of view, obviously.

      Probably get a book deal out of it, but you’d have to crawl before Johnny Stewballs and be a whipping boy beta bitch for leftists if you want the book deal. Or you can self-publish and know that posterity will thank you.

      Like


  70. I can’t see Romney winning unfortunately. I’m not saying this based on what the polls say but on what the betting agencies say. Here in Australia there was an election everyone thought would be close. The polls had it neck-and-neck. Then, late one night, I saw an interview with a guy from a betting agency, and he said the Liberal Party (which, strangely enough, is the conservative government over here) would definitely win. The election was held, and the Liberals won by a mile.

    If a newspaper’s polls are later shown to be inaccurate, the newspaper suffers a barely noticeable decline in reputation; if a betting agency’s odd are inaccurate, they potentially lose millions of dollars. The latter have a far bigger incentive to gauge voter sentiment correctly.

    I’m not saying this to annoy people but to prevent people from getting their hopes up.

    I agree the trying court the female vote is a waste of time. Women’s hearts rejoice in sugary, fairy-tale sentimentality. Any suggestions of not using tax-paying public as a public charity, of discriminating, of acknowledging cultural incompatibility, of hierarchy suggest the world is a naturally harsh place and that the law of the jungle applies as much to us as it does to all other life, only in a more complicated manner. And no matter how much Romney squirms before “historical victims” and “the disadvantaged” he reminds women of all these things – things which women are not set up to digest.

    You can’t make a goat eat a tin can, and you can’t make women acknowledge harsh reality.

    Ironically, it is the same sentimentality that causes married women to vote conservative. They think in voting the same as their husbands, as well as copying them in other respects, they are the same as their husbands. And they associate sameness with closeness.

    Perhaps the republican can recapture the white male vote in future elections but that will only save their hides temporarily. Hispanics women push out more Ricardos than our women do Richards. And no matter how big a number the republicans offer to write on welfare checks, the democrats will double it. Hence, the democrats win.

    Things may have been different had one of the Bushes tackled the boarder problem instead of hunting Arabs in the desert, but we’ll never know.

    No, I’m afraid the US of A is on a journey that inevitably ends at shitsville, and the current is only getting stronger.

    Like


    • Obama is going to lose and lose by a larger margin than most people think. There are 23 million people out of work, food and fuel prices are sky high.

      The numbers just do not add up for another term, even with most of the non-Fox media flailing to save him.

      Like


  71. I don’t understand why it’s alpha to disagree with women about politics or anything like that. I consider it beta to engage a woman seriously in an argument, especially about politics. Why would you talk politics with a woman?

    Like


    • Because for better or worse they can and do vote. So if you can get them to vote the right way you should. Granted sometimes it’s tilting at windmills but it’s still worth trying.

      Like


      • Are you serious, there NO WAY you will ever get one of these SWPL bitches to change their minds. It’s pointless trying, and it’s demeaning to your manhood to be arguing politics with a woman. I’ll never do it. It’s not beta to refuse to argue with a woman; it’s arguing and taking them seriously that’s beta.

        Like


      • If you slap them hard enough, they’ll do anything you say.

        True story. Ask Rhianna.

        Like


      • And run back to you every time for more.

        Like


      • Being outcome-dependent when debating politics with anyone (a woman especially) is beta, but discussing political matters isn’t. It’s a lot of fun to humor blue-pill idiots and calmly debunk their half-baked assumptions.

        Like


      • I don’t argue…I state what I believe and that’s it. If she tries to tell me otherwise I don’t listen.

        That’s why I wasn’t afraid to tell one of them that sexism is everywhere…and we should embrace it.

        Like


      • Mocking their emotion based reasoning and contradictory opinions will generally work wonders. But do it gently and with humor.

        Like


  72. I am divided on this matter. I like Obama and am mostly liberal, but I acknowledge that liberals are pushing us down the path of doom. Yet Republicans don’t seem to be answer, because in addition to their various economic flaws, they suffer from the same problem, only phrased differently. The phrase “man up” is frequently heard exactly from the white knights on the conservative side.

    Like


  73. Having the average person vote for their leaders was probably not the best idea in the first place (politicians are only encouraged to become cynical liars if they have to flatter the electorate like some habitual sycophant to get into office, and anyway most people know absolutely nothing of the world and thus cannot be trusted to make informed decisions), but extending the franchise to women was a deeply stupid thing to do. Increasingly, politics has played to women’s characteristics: appearance before substance, lying as routine, personal attacks instead of real debate…it’s no different than the way most female social circles operate. If we list the bad decisions made by men on the long march to the feminist ruin of society, women’s suffrage was one of them.

    Still, things were definitely salvageable even after women got the vote…to be honest I think it could be a tolerable state of affairs so long as men are to be recognized as the head of the house and so on. The concessions foolishly made to feminists during and after their “second wave” (of what fluid, we must ask) were what broke the back of civilized society and led to the mess we’re in today. One might ask whether the “second wave” would have been possible without women’s suffrage and that’s fair, but to me the issue is that so much ground was given up beginning in the late 60’s that we can’t put it all on women getting the vote in the 1910’s.

    But yeah, as others have rightly said, it’s all hurtling toward the same destination: breakdown of whatever nonsense has been built up, and an inevitable return to the basic and enduring facts of men and women. When the gravy train stops at reality station, we’ll see all the illusions go to the wayside.

    Like


  74. […] The Problem With Single Women Having The Vote « Chateau Heartiste […]

    Like


  75. I don’t even have to read the comments. All of you have it wrong.

    Abso-fucking-lutely wrong.

    You are all crying and bitching and wanting to set back the clock and you need to get the fuck over it.

    Better that government is married to bitches than you. Let me go through this logic for you real fucking slow so that you all can start to get it.

    Being married is a stupid life for a man. Actually being a father is a also stupid life for a man the way it is done in America today. You do the most stupid and mind numbing shit in both of those roles. There are better ways to spend your life than as a husband and a father in 2012 America. Being a married father is an insipid, mind numbing, idiotic existence. You are a slave.

    You live in a rigid schedule with a bitch that is never happy, that never has enough, is never satisfied, that is a cunt and a fucking idiot. She gets fat. She dresses like a man. Sex with her is a drag monotonous drag boring drag stupid drag. You have never ending stress and financial pressure and you must compromise your very soul in order to bring home the money that parasitic bitch and children demand from you. And they could not give a fuck about you. Everything is oriented towards her and them. Nothing is oriented towards you. Women have acres and acres of products for them and their children. Men have a aisle of shit over in the corner of stores.

    Given the way women are, and the way most of you are, your odds of being in a marriage forever and not getting a divorce is about zilch.point.shit. 0.0000%. Enough zeros? Any of you that are married are probably on the way to divorce if you are not divorced already. Any of you that do get married surely will be divorced.

    A man must avoid marriage, whether you are alpha as fuck or beta as a hell.

    If you are an alpha then marriage is perfect waste of what you are. All alphas, real alphas, chafe under the yoke of marriage. They cannot be monogamous and why should they be? And, once you say “I do”, then you begin a slow march towards to loss of alpha qualities. If you think you can read Athol Kay and avoid this, you are kidding yourself.

    If you are beta, then you will get fucked over in a marriage. Unless you earn in the top 20% of income, or in reality, the top 10% and your wife is not so attractive that she doesn’t has men throwing offers at her, then you will most likely get shafted. This outcome is one of the most written about topics in the Red Pill blogs.

    Men must learn game. What is so fucking hard about this idea? Men need to accept that the way the world is and the way it is going makes learning Game the most important skill that any man can have, more than calculus, than computer skills, than knowledge of tools. Game. Get it? Game. The reason for game is more than pick up lines, it is about avoiding OneItis. Game is a lifestyle that will save your ass and save you needless slavery and pain.

    Things are going to get worse in the future. Nothing can set back the clock. Women will get bitchier. Women will get fatter. In 30 years, 50% of women will be fucking obese. Not fat. OfuckingBese beasts. What few women that are attractive are going to get even shittier, flakier, bitchier, more choice addicted, bigger attention whores than even today. To fuck any of them you will have to have game. They will be besieged by hordes of men from 16 to 60.

    This reality of the social and sexual power that single women have is trickling down through women to girls. Yesterday there was a big press release about the drop in teen pregnancy, as well as a drop in every other age bracket other than bitches that are running up against the wall., 35+ Analysts were surprised that even teen pregnancy dropped. They rationalized that the other drops in births in age brackets other than teens were due to economic reasons, but teen pregnancy is by accident and inadvertent. But for whatever reason, teen girls are going to lengths to insure they don’t get pregnant and fuck up the next 20 years of being “Classy and Fabulous” and short circuiting the brilliant career of attention whoring in front of them. They are getting a clue of the power of that pussy. The word is passing down that there is a real up side to being an attention whore. And having a baby is the biggest downer in that possibility more than any other factor.

    There is chemical tendency in your fucking male body towards development of dopamine when you fuck a woman. She is like heroin and she will addict you and give you OneItis. This is another of the big Red Pill tenets, maybe the most important of all of them. The scarcity model creates OneItis in you.

    The only way to vaccinate yourself from OneItis is FourItis.

    If you have 4 women in a soft harem and you are spinning plates then you can walk away from a women when she tries to put that choke hold on you and drag you into the slavery of marriage.

    Any plain looking woman with a pussy that isn’t an obese pig or over 45 is going to be able to throw her husband away and have some other guy there ready to jump right in there. Your wife is going have men sabotaging you at work, at the gym, anywhere she goes. No matter how much Athol Kay you read, eventually all this back-stabbing and offers from other men and women is going to take its toll. You will get divorce raped if you are stupid enough to marry.

    You cannot marry. You have to spin plates.

    It will be enormously easier to have bitches to spin as plates if all of them are not married. It is better for you if every fucking woman is single and is a slut than it would be if almost all were married. It will be so much easier for you to spin plates if there are plates to be spun. Even if that women sits home 29 nights a month, that 1 night that she steps out to shake that ass, then she is looking for dick and the motherfucker with game is the one that is going to be the one she chooses.

    You cannot worry about “society” or “the economy” or “the future” or “the deficit” or the “growth of entitlements”.

    You need to worry about you. You. You. Fuck everything else. Fuck tomorrow. Fuck the deficit. Fuck the Republicans. Fuck the economy. Do what is best for you. And appreciate that by letting those bitches get what they want from government and not marrying, then that works in your favor, you, your favor, you, the typical reader of this blog.

    Go back to the original narrative about where “Alpha” came from, the Toba eruption that lead to 1000 years of Arctic winter and the number of bonding pairs reduced to less than 1000 over the whole world. Alpha had the Dark Triad of personality traits and this enabled him to survive, to get through, and women went with him because he was a survivor.

    You have to have that same selfish self-interest. You can’t worry about what’s best for kids, or bankers, or job growth, or household formation, or any of that shit. Worry about you.

    You cannot worry about the deficit or free markets or any economic shit that might come about because more and more benefits are given out to women in substitution of husbands. It won’t fall apart today and when it does fall apart you will be dead. If you are truly as narcissistic and as Machiavellian as you should be then you should not use any other filter than is a thing good for you. Feminism is good for you. It is freeing you from the stupidity of being some bitch’s husband. You get to live as a free man. It allows women to stay single so you can fuck them. Whatever negatives it has brought into society is trivial compared to the benefit of you not marrying anymore.

    You need to be happy that it is happening. Even if it raises your taxes by 10%, or even 20%, it is still better than being married. If you marry, that bitch will take 80% from you while you are married and then take 40% in child support when she divorces you. If you marry, you are a slave.

    It is said that marriage is the last resort of a bachelor. It is also said that a man marries because he is tired. Tired of dating. Tired of the bullshit the AFC goes through.

    Think back to 1985. When a man got to be 28 and just entering into his peak in SMV then he starts receiving “Marriage signals”. His friends start dropping off into marriage, one at a time. Women that he is with start pressuring him. They would dump him if he didn’t agree to commit to marriage. When a guy was 35 and wasn’t married then he was effectively alone in a world of married people.

    It’s not that way anymore.

    Dalrock is adamant that women are the ones eschewing marriage and not men. So every woman that decides not to marry, then that is one more man that gets to live free, free of the financial tyranny, free of the emotional bullshit, free of the monotony and the boredom, free of the abuse that women heap on men during marriage.

    The more men that are single then that begins to create market opportunities for men, more things that single men like, more clubs, more video games, more topless bars, more cars and products designed specifically for men, more housing options for single men. Options That are intended for only Single men and not married men that are making decisions with the filter of having a wife and family as the determining factor in their decisions.

    I’ll give a very stretched connection. I have no data to support it other Event A happened and Event B happened. But I feel they are related.

    The number of women that have the US government census status of “Never Been Married” has increased by 33% since 2000. 48% of women 25-30 have this status today, an increase of 16 percentage points since 2000 from 32% to 48%. For every one of those women that are not married, there is a man that is not married. So that means that the number of men that have “Never Been Married” has increased also. They are referred to as the Puearchy. It has grown considerably and is attracting the attention of pundits with this “Man Up” shaming bullshit.

    Now, look at the growth in the amount of college football today compared to 2000. There is much more. Look at the size of the TV contracts that have recently been signed. Do you fucking think married men are sitting around watching college football all day on Saturday? No, those guys are being dragged around malls, kids sports and kids social events. But if you are single, this development is a fucking bonanza for you.

    I read an article the other on how new Marketing strategies are emerging to actually tap this emerging market. Prior advertising oriented to men had some shaming factor in it. You should buy life insurance so your wife can have money when you die. You should buy our tires to keep from killing your kids. You should drink our beer, wear our clothes, our cologne so that women will want you. Some advertising is now actually appealing to motives that their product directly benefits you, the single man.

    More unmarried men means a better life and more options for unmarried men. Real choices that are for you and not choices that you would make in sacrifice for some woman and her children. More of your friends stay unmarried. You have more options now.

    So to sum, marriage is not for you, you, particularly, as a reader of this blog. You need to spin plates. You need women to avoid marriage because government allows them to feel the sense of security that they need to stay single. You want more men to be single and not get married so you have better and more market opportunities available that are designed for you, the single man. You want more women to be single and to be sluts. Because the more single women sluts there are, then more options for plate spinning that you have available to you. The more plates you spin, the less susceptible to Oneitis you are, and the more you avoid marriage. If you don’t marry then the effects of feminism, of divorce rape, of custody battles will have less effect on you. If there are more available single sluts then you get more pussy. It is in your benefit if no woman ever ever wants to marry ever again.

    You need to embrace feminism and stop throwing rocks at it. OK, changes have occurred. I have been run over by many of them as much as anybody. Work in corporations suck now. They have fucked up a lot of shit for men. But the big picture is that they are freeing men from a truly stupid life and allowing them to live free in a meaningful form.

    I don’t have to work a soul busting corporate job anymore to pay for some bitch that took 80% of the money that I made to spend on horseshit. I don’t have to sit in a fucking cube anymore surrounded by dweebs. I don’t have to sit in boring meetings and listen to bitches drone on. I do what I want. I eat what I want. I go where I want. I travel where I want. I work or don’t work when I want. I am now less lonely than I was because she went to sleep early and I was down in the living room watching the fucking stupid History Channel or reading one of 1000 books I read while I was married. I don’t have anyone looking over my shoulder at what I do, what I spend, where I go, who I talk to. I don’t have anyone whipping me, abusing me, screaming at me, manipulating me to do what she wants me to do.

    Because of feminism, I am fucking free. I am no longer a husband living that boring stupid life, and I no longer have to work in a stupid corporation to get the money to pay for the life that bitch constructed. I am no longer a slave.

    The reality is Women’s Liberation means Men’s Liberation. Let them go their fucking way. Let them be single moms. Let them work the stupid jobs that this economy is producing in those Femcentric companies.

    Better Obama is their husband than me. And you. The monetary price you would pay is worth the freedom that you will get.

    Stop fighting it and see it for what it is.

    Like


    • Well, at least Little League was fun.

      Like


    • Copied and pasted for later inspiration. Great fucking post!

      Like


    • Whatever your tragedies, whatever your trials: stop crying like a fucking woman all over the manosphere. You are repulsive.

      You screech about how unfair life is. I commiserate with you, though I do not relate to your unhinged despair. Your whiny why-me attitude is not acceptable in my presence. Especially since your off-putting pose is premised on the cynicism of a regretful old man determined to blame the entire world, everyone but himself, for his shitty position late in life.

      You will get nowhere until you take responsibility for yourself. These women you despise so much only get more powerful the more you give them the credit for destroying you. Shut. The. Fuck. Up.

      Matt

      Like


      • I was on the fence about reading a tenth or less of that shit above.

        Your reply is sufficient. Don’t even care.

        Ok, I peeked, and saw women’s lib is men’s lib.

        Minter? Sounds yiddy. Here’s my take: men’s lib is radical redomestication of women.

        Like


      • Neither you, uh nor Matt fucking get t. You are both trolls here, getting knee jerk angry when someone attacks monogamy and socialist conservatism.

        Why don’t you stop going on the attack like your lives depend on it whenever someone sticks up for soft polygamy or premarital sex?

        Neither of you care to get laid with younger, hotter tighter.

        That in itself classifies you both as trolls on this forum.

        You are both here with an agenda, one religious and the other white nationalism (a movement led by older women) and CH hurts his own message by not commenting under your posts at least asking you what your agenda is and whether you care about learning game.

        Neither of you made an intelligent argument against what Mark Minter said. You just wrote short ad hominem attacks.

        And most of what Mark Minter just wrote is pure CH rhetoric, except for some key points.

        So I will do YOUR work for you in rebuking Mark Minter.

        Mark, you belong here but I will explain why you shouldn’t vote Democrat.

        A. Why pay 20% more in taxes when you can vote Republican and not get married and thus neither pay 20% more nor 80% more??

        B. You are aware that wealth transfers are given to the hottest young ladies in the form of things like student loans that make them financially independent at precisely the time of their lives that you want to fuck them?

        When they get desperate to find a sugar daddy to pay for those loans, they will have already hit the wall at age 25. Why not have them desperate at age 19 to pay for their next year of college? Sugar daddies want to keep their money (not pay taxes) and they want the hottest females to need it to come from them directly.

        Democrats have been documented saying that they want to give money to all the hottest women in foreign countries so American men will look less like good marriage prospects to them.

        Why side with the enemy?

        C. Why not work with the Ron Paul crowd to make sure Republicans become a party of individual liberty again and stop trying to run everyone’s sex life?

        D. After age 22, women should worry about hitting the wall and strive to get married to the betas. If the 18 year olds see their older sisters hitting the wall only 4 years hence, they will act less bitchy. Remember that feminism isn’t about encouraging sluttiness so much as promoting ignorance of the approaching wall.

        All women under 22 will want sex with alphas by nature. Feminism is not needed for that.

        I know this first hand because I don’t live in a feminist region. I date 18 year olds whose older sisters have hit the wall at 24 or 25 and the younger sisters, while hesitating about committing to me because they still want to see if they can find someone better, are at least dating me. By contrast, a western 18 year old would believe, because of feminism and the student loans, that she will have twenty or more years of being able to expect a better man to waltz around the corner any minute.

        It’s better to live where 18 year olds believe they have 2 more years of being beautiful instead of living where 18 year olds believe they have 20 more years of being beautiful.

        The bitchiness is less in the former. Believe me on this. Your sex life will be better when you travel to an anti-feminist country (except an Islamic country where men stupidly keep their sisters and daughters away from each other until the men all want to keep suicide).

        With feminism, you will get rejected more than otherwise and the main reason an alpha will get rejected after he turns 35 is because of his age. Feminists want men to get rejected because of age as often and at the same ages that women get rejected because of age.

        Feminists insist that men go through menopause at the same time that women go through menopause. That’s why the NYBeta Times prints stories about men’s sperm supposedly declines enough so hot women shouldn’t have sex with them after they turn 40.

        Remember, alphas get rejected more often than other men because they approach more. An older alpha will constantly be told by feminist college girls that he is too old and is trying to exploit them. Non-feminist girls don’t think this way as much.

        Worse, feminists cannot be bought. That’s their trademark. Young men under 35 may think that is a good thing and it’s true that it helps the younger males compete against richer older males.

        But think long term Mark. Why would you want to work so hard to build things, like your civilization, only to find out that it doesn’t give you an advantage over some stupid surfer dude the same age as the girls you want to fuck?

        Feminists want to hate you for getting older the way men start to ignore women for getting older.

        You will be 36 sooner than you think.

        Plan ahead on what culture you want to be living in then.

        E. Finally, you will want virgins. You will want them raised in a non-feminist society so they will still be virgins when they become legal to have sex with.

        Believe me, women 18-21 will be hypergamous and slutty even without feminism.

        They will just be more discrete and not dare tell their fathers.

        But that is easy for them to do if they aren’t forced into burkhas.

        So in the end, Mark, you will want to be living in a conservative culture, that looks the other way at men being men, at least after you turn 30 or 35.

        But you won’t want the social conservative nightmare envisioned by those weird American WN types who agree with all the anti-male laws that women got passed since they got the vote.

        Most feminists are right wing by the way.

        Like


      • Wow, you really don’t get it, do you? Get off your high horse and take a course in reading comprehension you jackass. He is FREE, that is the entire point. He is liberated. And he wants other men to be FREE as well. Reread the post again smart guy.

        Like


      • @ King A (Matthew King): And your condescending, casual dismissal of someone else’s grief is not acceptable in MY presence.

        So put on your “repent, sinners, for the end is near” placard, get thee to the nearest subway, and harangue the pedestrians with your holier-than-thou drivel, you superstitious ass.

        Keep posting, Mark. If you can survive being tossed aside by your ex-wife, you can surely shrug off comments from the likes of “King A.”

        Like


    • Feminism is good for me but it’s destructive insane bullshit. I’ll be happy to bang sluts but I’ll also be happy to talk shit about femcunts.

      What’s good for the individual is often not good for the group. I know you know it, but you’re forcing yourself to praise something that you know is deeply wrong. If our ancestors had that mindset of yours, we would still be cave-dwelling in the cold.

      This country will probably collapse, whites will probably go extinct, but being poolside doesn’t mean denying the truth. Leave those solipsistic rationalizations for hamsters, they are unworthy of a man.

      Like


    • Bravo. The master is at it again. I would love to buy you a beer but I’m afraid you might start yelling at the waitress.

      Like


    • on October 5, 2012 at 9:43 pm WideboyOfTheWesternWeb

      Hands down the most Alpha post on this thread, Mark. Fighting smart is all about using your enemy’s force in your favor. Read Sun Tzu, people.

      The comments here were a lot better before the invasion of Christian idiots like King A. and Greg Eliot. I don’t need your laughable attempts to reinstate theocratic values on society, let’s leave that to the Muslims, OK?

      As for Obama, if I still lived in the toilet that America has become, I’d vote for him. Because I want a revolution SOONER, not later. Get it?

      Like


      • Hear that, Matt?

        You and I… we two… are an invasion!

        Sounds pretty alpha to me… (chest puffing up in pride).

        Scripture tells us why, and WideMouthBoy just verified it:

        The wicked flee when no one is pursuing, But the righteous are bold as a lion. Proverbs 28:1

        7A thousand may fall at your side
        And ten thousand at your right hand,
        But it shall not approach you.

        8You will only look on with your eyes
        And see the recompense of the wicked.
        Psalm 91: 7,8

        Like


    • Sounds like you are not a fan of marriage. Ah well. I believe it can be a heaven or a hell. It makes you more of what you are and who you get with. I say that though as one never married. I want to be. Anyway, I agree with the alpha and beta model in nature but not as much in humans for the following reason: It definitely exists in promiscuous species. It definitely does not exist in monogamous pair bonding species. What are humans? I think we are some degree “omni-amorouis” but I think our pair bonding monogamy is much newer, and helped bring in the traits that made us human- i.e. long developmental period of human children, which requires a family structure to support, women’s weakness in providing for herself. I don’t think the main evo strategy was marry a beta and sneak away to get with alpha. I simply don’t think this was an ESS, evo stable strategy for human society. Those penis experiments about scraping competitive semen away from vagina were done with dildos on cornstarch without foreskins. So yeah, I think every man for humanity was an alpha to his wife or mate. Now the ag revolution came and we end up having warlike tribes and masters and serfs. But these societies eventually collapse, so that is no measure. Just like ours will collapse. You see I think alpha beta is soo simplistic to apply to humans. If we go way back and deep down, we have that, but we gave that up, in exchange for society, community, big brains. Now women can act like this because of the power of the state, divorce courts, welfare state, essentially FORCING men to be beta providers, but I do believe this is without precedent. in the past men would have just gone their own way. What we have is harem politics. I don’t consider Obama any kind of alpha, because they don’t exist so much in human species. HE is rather a theif and a con artist and a betrayer of our gender and both genders and society. I’m not complaining and bitching see, I am just trying to understand clearly. I think the idea of someone being able to “learn how to be alpha” is contrary to alpha males in other species in ethology, in that body size determines it. It is more like people who can break cokes, hackers, that are called alpha, and that depends on access to the internet. Also it is those who are willing to stoop down and ignore moraliity like Obama. To call either of these Alpha, in the primate gorilla sense of the word seems like a joke, and with this collapses the whole model all of you have build for yourself. I agree it must exist deep down, these instincts, but we forget one other factor that enables such a modern system to exist: Women have been coddled and shielded from suffering and hardship, and men have been over exposed to it. Therefore women become childish and men are more likely to just suck it up. My point in saying this is that it is not necessarily all biolgoical, but has a large basis in culture. Those women who seem to be the wisest and who gain my respect, whatever generation, tend to be those who have had to work, pay their way, be rejected, etc. Another nail in the alpha/beta coffin. There is some truth but I think we are confused in our terms. What we essentailly have to do is learn how to beat the modern system. that is more like being a hacker, not an ‘alpha’ in the scientific term. Now, what our end goals are might differ among us. I still maintain and feel that the ultimate is marriage and children and grandchildren, without even going asian but staying local. I respect if other people don’t want to try, because today it is like trying to shoot the moon. what was once a given is now incredibly difficult to make happen in a mutually rewarding way. But I think it is possible. But if other people have other goals, more in the short term, I think that is fine. I think that is copying women and regressing into our earlier stages of evolution (yes I understand evolution is blind and does not have a direction ,but all the same, it’s an earlier stage). You mention dopamine bonding in men after sex. Don’t you think there was an evolutionary reason for that? Doesn’t thjs throw a monkey wrench in your whole theory? No, the real problem is deep and insidious and requires more than learning game, but requires intense deep understanding of psychology and the mind and the heart and sociology and economics and culture and and and…not becoming bitter or cynical but not beeing foolish either. It is definitely an obstacle course and a deadly labyrinth and marathon but it is one I am trying to run because no matter how hard it is, I think it is the only one I want. Actually it might be much easier if I just looked in the church for my wife. I am christian. not that many there won’t be corrupted- they are, both men and women- but the likelyhood may be higher.

      So. I say yes to marriage, but with huge caveats. Comitters beware. We need to learn above all what we deserve to feel entitled to. That is a good starting place. Women feel entitled to too much, men feel entitled to too little. Feeling entitled to but little is not some form of healthy altruism but is pathological for all of society. Nature put these desires there for a reason: So I am thinking about feeling of entitlement lately, as a base starting point for how to bargain towards a mutually satisfying relationship to marriage.

      Marriage should be sacred. In general there is not much sacred left in the world. maybe this also plays a role. everything has become corrupted and profaned, made vulgar and common. This could be another starting place. I do agree, most marriages will fail and be hell. One need not b superman, I don’t think. One only need to learn to think accurately, so that is what I am focused on trying to do. I study politics and culture, but in the end I try to focus on myself and make it all personal, like women do, but in a healthy way, win win for everybody, and that includes myself too! The key is thinking, and doing so slowly, and thoroughly, and feeling, and doing so slow and thoroughly. With thinking and feeling comes liberation from our chains, which we don’t want to be attached to, but the idea of a general vague “freedom” is also nonsense, just like “hope and change” is meaningless hot air. Thank you

      Like


    • Having gone through hell, maybe your hopeful attitude is deserved, but in the long term I’m less optimistic. To balance the economic system 80%+ of man’s labor will still have to siphoned off through taxation and devaluing his productivity. To balance the sexual system women will have to become even more repellent. Maybe we should just live for ourselves and ignore the future–which will presumably correct itself–but it’s hard to isolate yourself from the current world, and certainly accepting Feminism is just too much to swallow.

      Like


  76. White women launch baby killing ship:

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/04/us-abortion-morocco-dutch-idUSBRE8930WJ20121004

    I guess they ran out of white babies to kill.

    Thanks a lot white man.

    Like


    • The group, which was invited to Morocco by [local] rights group Alternative Movement for Individual Freedoms (MALI)…

      You should read your own posts… this is, what, the third or forth time you’ve shown your ass.

      Like


    • on October 6, 2012 at 2:29 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

      Where is the iceberg when you need it.

      Like


  77. The fundamental contradiction of liberal ideology with respect to ‘game’.

    Men must not be socially dominant, but women find social dominance in men attractive.

    Therein lies the seeds of destruction for the feminist pillar in liberal ideology.

    Like


  78. well, a reason feminism was created for, among other issues, is women gullibility in relationship to political (control) matters. this is because women naturally bend towards power figures, and they’re easily deceived thanx to psychological hardwired mechanisms like the infamous female solipsism.
    female vote efficiently dilute rational/conscious/aware voters turning them into insignificant proportions. women notably votes according to sympathy/image/idealizations far more than the male populace does, rather than base their preference on a solid ground of logic and facts.
    i might be wrong but didn’t hitler won germany’s elections thanks to women vote? (and than the guy established gun control laws on the population, just to reconnect to the “anarcho-tyranny”, a sad but true reality…)

    Like


    • It’s true. the womens’ vote tipped the scale in Hitler’s favor. It was also a big reason he drew such crowds. He had rock star status in his day. An excellent book on this subject, that puts the rise of the Nazis in the correct context, is Otis Mitchell’s Hitler Over Germany. He has an accute grasp of the social and political situation in Weimer Germany. Its about 225 pages.

      Like


      • That was brave of you to point out, Tyrone, with all the new white nationalist regulars here now.

        The head of a male WN would normally explode if you pointed out that the Third Reich depended on women supporting it.

        The Nuernberg Laws were written to protect older German women from their husbands cheating on them with younger, hotter Slavic women.

        Like


      • WN’s don’t fret over women’s support… the more, the merrier, especially when men and women see eye-to-eye on the future of the nation.

        As far as the Nüremberg Laws being written because older German women dreaded straying husbands, well… that’s just outright silliness.

        Of course, to the man who only has a hammer, everything looks like a nail…. but that doesn’t make it so, chum.

        Like


      • I almost wish we could all go back to small-town Christian beliefs, if only to escape this freedom trap in which everyone is at liberty to rewrite history to score points in their own head. Biology doesn’t exist. Germans cheating on their wives with Slavic broads. Race is only skin-deep, except when it isn’t. Cats talking to each other (a girlfriend believed this). Everyone’s “equal”, those failing kaffirlets are just oppressed, need more gibsmedats. Pampered whiteskin cunts screeching about “double standards” while benefiting from the greatest double standards in human history.

        Fidelity, truth, honor, genetic continuity itself, are optional. “Lifestyle choices”.

        It never fucking ends, Greg. My head does feel on the point of exploding sometimes — from having to endure everyone’s freestyle selfish bullshitting.

        Like


      • We can’t all be collectivists like you uh.

        We can’t all forget about pursuing hotter, younger, tighter because we our dicks only rise to notions of honor and fidelity to older hags whom Greg says he “sees eye to eye” with.

        But, if you have a fertile woman and it still rises for her, go for it and let us know. Both of you come across as gay or impotent.

        And calling it “silly” that the likes of Magda Goebbels weren’t concerned about the younger competition, just shows a lack of reading skills and common sense. The whole WN movement from Hitler’s day until now has been one where the women run the show.

        Like


      • I almost wish we could all go back to small-town Christian beliefs, if only to escape this freedom trap…

        It never fucking ends, Greg. My head does feel on the point of exploding sometimes — from having to endure everyone’s freestyle selfish bullshitting.,

        That is one bastardization of the concept of Christianity. Christ would be looking down from the clouds and shaking his head at your statement uh.

        What you just wrote is a great advertisement for taking federal tax advantages from religious institutions (although the government should reduce taxes for everyone).

        No, uh, World War Two will continue forever as long as your kind thinks they will ever force their warped collectivist beliefs on others.

        You are the same as a Marxist. Hitler was the same as Stalin. None of you believe in individual free will and market economies.

        Sexual economies are market economies. Feminism can be destroyed by removing state sponsorship and restoring the US to a market sexual economy.

        You don’t have to disagree with the rest of us about that by getting all reactionary and dreamy about applying force and throwing the baby out with the bathwater by wanting to end great sexual opportunities for men.

        In the absence of feminism, women under 21 will still be hypergamous and fuck alphas discretely while telling their dads and brothers that they are still virgins. Betas would get to marry 22 year olds who make them believe they are still virgins. Civilization grew that way and everyone was cool with that. It was called “soft monogamy” and it works.

        Where civilization collapses is under Islam where men use force to stop each other from getting laid by killing and beating their own sisters and daughters. This is called “hard monogamy” and it doesn’t work. It just makes young men suicidal as we see in the Middle East today.

        American feminism, among other things, is about continued and open sluttery after age 22 when women should know they don’t have that much power over men anymore but where the culture creates a false valuation.

        Like


      • Anonymous, you have already been dismissed as silly… so pipe down, there’s a good fellow.

        Like


      • It never fucking ends, Greg. My head does feel on the point of exploding sometimes — from having to endure everyone’s freestyle selfish bullshitting.

        I feel your pain, bro… since the advent of the internet, wherein everyone can spout off their idiocies without accountability, I have seen the amplification of the human condition and wonder what it is that God sees in us that He could yet find love and mercy.

        Let it end, once and fall all… and if I have been wrong myself, then I gladly perish as well, just to see His true will and mankind the way we were meant to be pick up the pieces.

        Like


      • Perhaps SWPLs should be forgiven for thinking all WNs think of Hitler as their idol.

        Like


      • The truth is the truth. Hitler was the man of the day and it was even fashionable to follow him in many circles. He was going to toss out the corrupt, self serving political and business classes and level the playing field for the working man. The New World Order was going to be a National Socialist gleaming city on the hill with a new society built of National Socialist Man, the Nazi equivalent of the ideal communist citizen, Socialist Man, which Socialism would lead to. A lot of people fell for it.

        Like


  79. It’s obvious that choice number 1 will never work, since Obama already have the upper hand on that area. The best thing, I believe, would be number 2. Hold your ground, reinforce your position, and stand tall against the onslaught.

    Like


  80. on October 5, 2012 at 11:27 am Ashley Herzog Bristow

    Uh, where do you get this garbage about us women from? I found out my boyfriend (now husband) reads this blog. Jesus Christ. He was actually a 25-year-old virgin when we met, which was something I liked and admired about him. He kept it in his pants. Women (at least the good ones) admire men who are NOT promiscuous. You only have a problem with women because you go after the materialistic chicks who have implants. That’s all you care about. You’re shallow, and the broads you want are shallow. (I ended up having a baby with my virginal husband. I thought he was awesome. I married him at 6 months, because he *is* awesome. You guys aren’t. The only people who want the type of “alpha male” you describe are the sluts and gold diggers.)

    Like


    • A wise man loves a reproof.

      Gentlemen, I won’t speak for all of you, but I myself feel roundly chastised.

      Like


    • I doubt your husband wants everyone to know when he lost his virginity.

      Like


      • You know what a good beta move is. Telling a woman you are a virgin.

        Congrats Ashley on roping one in.

        Like


      • The irony is lost on her.
        She liked him enough to marry at 6 months in, in most likelihood BECAUSE he had learned to “Up the alpha behavior” from this blog.

        It is doubtful she would have been attracted to him at all if she perceived that he only kept his pants zipped up because no one would ever want to see them unzipped.

        Her hamster will never, ever, let her see this truth however.

        Like


    • I actually think this Bristow-woman is quite attractive. I didn’t read her posts, because I read this blog to have a good time and some realtalk, no stern words from some angry woman.

      Anyway, Ashley, this blog is one of the few places where guys can just let it out, talk about what they like. Like Jezebel is for girls. What’s the problem? if you don’t like it, just go away.

      Good for you for finding a good man. Be good to him too.

      Like


    • Her husband was a virgin, but she shouts that women LOVE SEX (with alpha badboys) and she probably had an awesome ride on the cock carousel. Gender role reversal, anyone?

      I think she fucks him with her clit.

      Like


    • I can hardly follow the premises behind her complaining, other than a general, incoherent cri de coeur all too typical of the enraged harpy on the offensive. Is she on our side? Is she a feminist? Fuck if I know.

      I do know that, in my presence, Mrs. Kyle would only take my Lord and my God’s name in vain once. Once.

      Matt

      Like


      • She said “white supremacist” referring to Bristow.

        Means despite cohabitation, and probably hours of conversation about white dispossession and so on, wherein she undoubtedly nodded her head and said, yes, yes, I totally agree, and after reading his books, she comes away with the same jew-begat reductionist scare-meme with which she went into it: i.e. learned absolutely NOTHING and acted like a total sociopath.

        Like


      • on October 6, 2012 at 11:05 am Kermit The Frog

        Or, is perhaps more sophisticated than your garden variety troll. Look at the comments made in context, and ask yourself: why would these things be posted?

        Cui bono?

        Like


      • @ King A (Matthew King): Jesus Fucking Christ, Matt….can’t you have at least at little God-damned tolerance for a God-damned feminist shrike??

        Like


      • She is on your side King A. She equates porn and prostitution to Marxism despite the fact that 5 of the 6 US senators now pushing to pass a federal law criminalizing backpage.com are Democrats who consider that “exploitation of women”. Marco Rubio is the one Republican pushing to shut down backpage.com showing he wants to suck up to this right wing feminist.

        In answer to your question, is she a feminist, yes she is, because of her focus on limiting alternate options for men, dishonest conflation of such issues with ideologies she knows males don’t like (Republican feminist trojan horses have been pulling the wool over the eyes of gullible evangelical betas for more than 100 years) and because she refuses to accept Evo Psych, perhaps the leading indicator of what it means to be feminist.

        Feminists are feminists even if they are Mona Charon or Ann Coulter or Sarah Palin.

        Like


    • Ryu? Tis is Ryu, isn’t it? Are you dreaming of virgin white cock again?

      Like


  81. Hi Heartiste this is O/T but I am hoping I can get some feedback from some posters here on a situaiton related to game. Please only respectful posters. its about how I responded on another forum to a “shy man” who wrote a poem to a woman he was interested in but didn’t have the guts to approach.

    Thanks!

    [heartiste: you heard the lady. r.e.s.p.e.c.t. neecy, why don’t you post your specific issue here in the comments and i’ll give you advice in good faith.]

    Like


    • Neecy, you read this blog. Why should you even have to table this scenario?

      Love poetry addressed to female plebs: “creepy”. The end.

      Like


    • Oh, Neecy, my darling,
      Oh, Neecy, my duck,
      Let’s go to the garden
      Where I’ll give you a … flower.

      My bonnie lass, she smelleth,
      She maketh the flowers jealousth,
      My bird of chocolatey tuffs,
      I am verily cuckoo for cocoa puffs!

      Like


  82. on October 5, 2012 at 11:52 am Ashley Herzog Bristow

    This is me.

    http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/09/07/hello-herzog/

    Oh, and if this Chateau Heartiste loser idiot wants to debate me about the pseudo-science called “evo psych”, I’ll give him a run for the money. (Oh wait, that’s what I’m after, right? Women don’t like sex. We’re trying to find someone to take care of us. Because the evo psych pop science idiots say so, amirite? Idiots.)

    Like


    • Nice photo. You’re proving us right as we speak.

      Like


    • …4 years ago, that is not you now. howd the wall taste?

      Like


    • Calling your opponent an idiot is a good debate tactic…in second grade.

      Like


    • You wear too much make-up… and you talk like a Portuguese sailor.

      That said, you’re an Aryan woman married to an Aryan man, with one child and hopefully more on the way… so you’re aces on the important stuff, toots.

      Like


      • …and this is why you fail.

        She’s a cunt, but at least she’s White. LOL!

        You know what they call it when a Gay dude marries a woman? How is it different when a straight guy marries a shrew because she’s the “right” ethnicity?

        Do you feel you’re doing the world or your “race” a favor by breeding down in intelligence or temperament, for the sake of skin color or a truly ethnically irrelevant stamp?

        Like


      • White children being produced covers a multitude of flaws.

        You, however, are merely a cunt of irrelevant stamp… equally shrewish, yet without her physical charms… such as they are.

        You’re piping in on my posts again to play yet another weak hand is truly tiresome. Find a more rational endeavor.

        Like


      • Your opinion that I’m ugly or a shrew is irrelevant since you are not my equal on any any account. It’s like a mouse deciding that a lioness is ugly because she is not smaller, or more to the point weaker than him, or a shrew because attempting to mate with her could be fatal for him, and definitely boring for her.

        I stay in my lane. All I’m saying is that a lioness doesn’t owe her sexual attention to another for simply being a lion. Nor is a lion obligated to shag a substandard lioness simply because she is a lioness.

        There are enough to go around without excusing crappy maladaptive behavior. The least you could do for what you view as your “race” (though I find your arbitrary divisions overly simplistic), is have some damned standards.

        A cunt of any ethnicity is utterly useless. So unless I am being attacked, I don’t treat people like crap. You feel like I’m mistreating you only because your oversensitivity and self pity blind you to someone attempting to help you if they don’t couch their language in false humility and rather unnecessary capitulation to a presumed and artificial authority you feel you are entitled to for being born. This does not mean that I am actually mistreating you.

        Like


      • Your opinion that I’m ugly or a shrew is irrelevant since you are not my equal or better on any any account. It’s like a mouse deciding that a lioness is ugly because she is not smaller, or more to the point weaker than him, or a shrew because attempting to mate with her could be fatal for him, and definitely boring for her.

        I stay in my lane. All I’m saying is that a lioness doesn’t owe her sexual attention to another for simply being a lion. Nor is a lion obligated to shag a substandard lioness simply because she is a lioness.

        There are enough to go around without excusing crappy maladaptive behavior. The least you could do for what you view as your “race” (though I find your arbitrary divisions overly simplistic), is have some damned standards.

        A cunt of any ethnicity is utterly useless. So unless I am being attacked, I don’t treat people like crap. You feel like I’m mistreating you only because your oversensitivity and self pity blind you to someone attempting to help you if they don’t couch their language in false humility and rather unnecessary capitulation to a presumed and artificial authority you feel you are entitled to for being born. This does not mean that I am actually mistreating you.

        I hope that you improve yourself. She hopes you castrate yourself. That you don’t see the difference speaks to your insecurity not my irrationality. Besides, I don’t need to be rational. I’m not a hooker.

        Like


      • Hey mammy, don’t you have some breadfruit to chop?

        Like


      • Ah, I wish. Keep guzzling that refined sugar and wheat though. Natural selection.

        Like


      • Try again kaffir. Been paleo for two years.

        Wait a second, why is this overweight old black bitch saying “natural selection” like I’ll check out before she will?

        Good lord these people ought never to have been brought inside.

        Like


      • I call bullshit. Paleo folk generally don’t insult others for being more paleolithic in lifestyle.

        Also, a few important points of data for you: I am 42 years old, and probably look and function better than your mom did or does at the same age. If I do die before my 90’s, it’ll probably be from falling off the side of a mountain or getting shot by Muslims in Osogbo or something.

        When you’re going to die is irrelevant compared to how you’ve lived, and my life is pretty good. I don’t need to hate anybody for their color because I get treated with respect by most people of a variety of colors. The few times I don’t, I teach them to respect me or at least to not let me know they don’t because it is dangerous for them.

        So you should learn to keep things in perspective. Online, we debate and hash out these social and intellectual issues in the realm of theory and whatnot, but in practice, what counts is what you do, not as much what you say and think. If you want to believe you are superior to me, I don’t knock that any more than I would a child pretending for a moment that he is a ninja or somesuch.

        Eventually though, you and they have to grow the fuck up.

        Like


      • ” Paleo folk generally don’t insult others for being more paleolithic in lifestyle. ”

        Right. ‘Cause they’re liberals. You’re a fuckin black genius. Like on that billboard with the little gibsmedat at school and some inspirational quote about inventing the next whatever!!! OMGG lzozozozo reality isn’t what you make of it lzlzlzlz

        Like


      • Uh, you are the first self proclaimed paleo diet adherent who I have ever seen dissing anyone for being paleo. You give yourself away as a liar and a nutbar who is just getting his/her jollies from calling people nigger online. You got nothing.

        Like


    • So when can we expect a photo of you from this year, without makeup ?

      Like


    • Mrs. Bristow

      You cannot deny that there is a problem between men and women nowadays. The fact of the matter is that you, and many other women, expect the guy to approach you.

      How many men have you seen, that really have the balls to do this ?

      And from the men that have the balls to approach, how many men have you seen, that you’d be delighted to have some coffee with, at a later date ?

      And if this guy sends you a text message, do you reply ASAP or is there something that keeps you from doing this ?

      Mrs. Bristow, let’s make this more personal :

      There are men that you’d never allow through your front door ; and then there are men that you’d allow through your front, but only into the living room ; and of those few men, even less gets to go to your bedroom.

      What you never see Mrs. Bristow, are the men on the street, that never tried knocking on your door. It’s those *creepy* guys that leave love poems for women they’ve never met, on impersonal comment threads.

      And some of those men know they’re buggering up. And they want to improve.

      So those men come to this blog, Mrs Bristow … and some other delightful personalities as well …

      I hope you can understand this now Mrs. Bristow … and you have my word that I’d love to knock on your door one day … as long as there is lasagna in the kitchen … you look like you can make lasagna.

      Sincerely.

      Marellus.

      Like


    • This attention whoring shrike really drives home the guy’s anti-marriage screed a few comments above.

      Like


    • Tits or gtfo.

      Like


    • Looks like a Real Doll. With too much makeup.

      I’d face-fuck it though for sure.

      Like


    • Guys, the reality of right wing feminism is staring you right in the face here.

      This is what I meant when a few of the tradcons here got into an argument with me elsewhere in this thread, when I said that Romney needs to get through the next 4 weeks without seeming to side with these shrews, such as by declaring he’ll make good on the pledge he signed to outlaw porn.

      The reaction of men above to this right wing feminist is EXACTLY how normal men will react to Romney if he is seen sucking up to the likes of her.

      The Republican Party is still beholden to these right wing feminists. So is most of the WN movement and most evangelical churches, especially in the US south.

      I don’t believe she’s trolling at all here. She’s being who they are, the leaders of the established American conservative movement. They don’t yet control the Ron Paul movement but they were seen trying (via manginas who kept writing that they were Ron Paul fanatics but that he needed to reverse his views on allowing porn and prostitution because that supposedly has nothing to do with individual freedoms and limited government).

      Take this quote of hers

      worthless courses: classes in Marxism, prostitution (Sociology of the Sex Industry is all the rage), “queer theory,” pornography, and rock and rap music.

      Notices how she conflates Marxism with prostitution when everyone knows that the Marxists have wanted to criminalize prostitution in order to achieve equality and stop “exploitation”. Ditto for her hatred of porn.

      She’s the enemy and the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Bring on the porn and prostitutes even though I don’t have to use them anymore because this blog taught me game.

      AND GET THE LIKES OF HER THE FUCK OUT OF THE GOP.

      She’s the reason so many single males hate the Republican Party (not me because I intend, like Ron Paul, to fight for control of the GOP).

      Now notice how she doesn’t believe in Evo Psych.

      Evangelists don’t believe in evolution either, right?

      She’s only repeating what social conservatives believe (don’t believe).

      This is also in keeping with the left wing feminist view of Evo Psych.

      Isn’t it convenient how both the right wing female political pundits and the left wing female political pundits don’t believe in Evo Psych.

      Remember, her type shares power with the left wing feminists to control the US.

      Male social conservatives and male WNs control fuck all. They just enable women like her.

      Neither side in our two party system believes in Evo Psych. They actively oppose those who do, and with ever progressive lawmaking.

      Further, she’s hung up on the false idea that this blog stresses that women are supposedly after money from men.

      This blog, sadly, stresses the opposite, and I will explain why.

      You see, in a non-feminist society, the hottest women really do care a lot about men having money with which to marry them and take care of them.

      But this woman is a staunch feminist American woman, a right wing feminist to be sure, but no different from left wing feminists on the most important issue, which is the inability to recognize Evo Psych realities that women in non-feminist countries understand as a matter of course.

      Feminists are almost impossible to buy. They hate prostitution with every fiber of their body. This is the reason why this right wing fembot would share the feelings of any Jizzabel editor in wanting to hate this blog because she falsely believes it to promote the idea that women want men for their money.

      CH and YaReally, etc, have had to learn game more than most men in other countries because feminist western women on both the right and left are being encouraged by their friends and the media to reject guys who are the producers of civilization and might have money.

      So this woman is complaining about nothing.

      Like