• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Science Proves Game Works
Women Dabbling In False Identities »

Lots Of Feminists Are Getting Banged Out By PUAs

January 3, 2013 by CH

Ronin asks:

Just out of curiosity, have any of the real PUAs here ever used game to nail a Jizzabel-type feminazi?

As an aspiring womanizer, you don’t need to act with intent to nail an avowed feminist. If you scavenge snatch in the SWPL regions of any major American city (barring a few notable exceptions*), you WILL have collected more than a few feminist notches on your bedpost. This is because most girls in the big blue population sinks of SWPL-Land are feminists of one stripe or another. You can’t swing an Emperor Deluxe condom without hitting a feminist in the cooch if you live or operate within these zones of misandry.

Of course, not all SWPLcity feminists are cut from the same unsanitary napkin. SWPL chicks generally fall into three main groups of feminist identification:

1. The Femcunts

These are your Jizzebomb fanatics, the devotees of feminism as a life-affirming ideology. They are the smallest in number, but the loudest in bitchery and kookery. This is the kind of manjawed girl — typically a lawyer, academic, organic farmer or diversity consultant — who reads and comments daily at sites like Feministing and Slate/Salon/SuckMyClit with furrowed brow, regurgitating what she learns therein at parties and in the middle of dates, exposing a vile expectation that all the world should agree with where her retarded logic takes her. As long as you don’t embroil yourself in her occasional tantrums at invisible enemies, and keep the pick-up light and breezy while steering her in different conversational directions whenever you sniff the approach of another feminist tirade carried along by the id winds, you will get the bang. She is, underneath her femcuntery, still a woman, and as such (however much you may need reminding) she will respond viscerally to ancient cues of your mate worthiness, and her vagina will flower in spectacular opposition to the wilting of her mind. You don’t want to stay with women like these beyond a few hate smashes, so for shits and giggles I suggest you regale her in the morning with your support of the Second Amendment and the ludicrousness of the equal pay myth. For bonus soul-shivving points, casually muse aloud, after you have sprayed her mug and she’s inserted her glazed face into your armpit nook, that 1 in 5 women who are being raped will orgasm during the act.

2. The Partisans

These are the girls who occasionally read feminist blogs (usually when a fat femcunt friend passes along a link) and parrot the benumbing Cathedral crap they hear on TV and read in approved MSM papers. But these soapbox episodes are blessedly infrequent and pass unremarked, unless they manage to corral some dipshit manboob into acting as a sounding board for their cockamamy nonsense on white male privilege and socially constructed beauty standards (Hugs Shyster, Scrotumless Scalzi, I’m looking at you two distilled estrogen pools.) They believe the feminist canon, but live and conduct their dating lives in a decidedly non-feminist fashion. You will rarely, for instance, find a fattie or a mustachioed Marcuntte wannabe amongst this group. At the end of the day, they like being girls, and are all too happy to ignore the inherent contradictions between feminism and their love of shopping for shoes and falling for assholes.

3. The Lemmings

You have to understand that the anti-feminist/pro-rationality message does not get out in America’s major cities. There simply isn’t an anti-Cathedral reporting or opinion outlet with enough heft to influence more than a tiny fraction of women away from the idiocy that is feminism. This being the case, MOST women in the cities will have spent the better part of their sexually adventurous single girl years steeped in the platitudes of feminism, and they will know nothing else. Combined with women’s natural aversion to abstract thinking beyond immediate, selfish concerns, what you wind up with is a population of lickspittle lemmings who mindlessly nod in agreement every time a talking head exploiting this deficiency in the mental circuitry of half the voting public sonorously intones something about “equal pay for equal work”, or “war on women”. The Lemmings, by far the largest group of women you will likely encounter unless you live in South Dakota, include all types of girls, from club sluts to self-important HR robots to daddy’s princesses to deliriously frantic scenesters. Luckily for your sanity, these girls do not take feminism seriously; not if we measure “seriousness” by the frequency and intensity with which a person holds a belief. They are far more interested in looking hot for you, and gossiping endlessly about relationship drama in their circle of friends. Sure, if you press them “What do you think of free birth control?”, they’ll eagerly approve and perhaps segue into a condemnation of those “rape-y Republicans” and Sandra Fluke’s godliness, but mostly they just go about their lives oblivious to feminism’s charms.

So there you have it. Given that 90% of your city’s women are feminist in name if not in execution, the odds that you will bang out, or currently are banging out, a feminist are pretty good. Most hardcore feminists, whether or not they know it, are fucking men who either pretend to give a shit about their precious ideology, or don’t even bother with the pretense of pretending to give a shit about it. In fact, the majority of men, and an even bigger majority of players, are like me: they find feminism absurd on its face and will dismissively change the subject anytime the girls they are seeing make the mistake of veering into feminist bromide territory. Most girls are sensible and will know when their feminist retardation is turning off the men they like, and will quickly fall in line with the change of subject.

There are exceptions. A few supercharged feminists will eventually wind up with sycophantic manboobs for lovers, and a more perfect pairing I couldn’t imagine.

*I currently live near one of those notable exceptions, and damn straight I’m keeping that info close to the vest.

**Many SWPL cities have geographically extensive ghetto areas, which I don’t consider part of the SWPL, or feminist, world. Ghettoes are like exotic locales that SWPLs like to brag they’ve lived in for six months, when in fact all they did was read about them in the crime section, or pass through them on a bus.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Dating, Feminist Idiocy, The Big City Life, Ugly Truths | 255 Comments

255 Responses

  1. on January 3, 2013 at 3:59 pm whorefinder

    Best way to deal with feminazis?……..RAPE!

    Also, something’s up the commenting system guys, it’s barely letting anything pass through. Kind of frustrating for us regulars who offer nothing but joy, happiness, and lollipops in our missives.

    LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 4:21 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      Rape. It’s what’s for dinner.

      LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 4:51 pm Zombie Shane

        WARNING: I hate to be a downer, but if you’re pro-life, then be forewarned that the Fem-cunts WILL sneak off to the abortuary and murder your child.

        There is NO reasoning with them – none whatsoever – it’s worse than talking to a brick wall.

        Several years ago, I had a brief encounter with one of them [she had come with good recommendations from someone whom I thought I could trust, and I had mistakenly plugged her on the night before she ovulated, not knowing what a horrible Fem-cunt she would prove to be] and thereafter I had two of the very worst, most hellish weeks of my life, waiting for her to start bleeding again.

        But she told me point blank that she would have murdered the child if she had gotten pregnant.

        She was the last Blue State nihilist chick that I ever plugged – the only chicks I’ve plugged since have been Red State chicks who seemed like they had good hearts and whom I felt I could trust.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 6:38 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Would you have been happy to commit to 18 years of child support payments had things turned out otherwise? Would you have wanted to marry this woman you barely knew? Those were your other two options.

        But don’t worry; I do agree with your basic premise: Pro-life men and pro-choice women shouldn’t sleep together. I don’t mean this in the Lysistrata sense; I mean it sincerely. If you as a male genuinely feel that having a fetus you fathered be aborted would be the murder of your child, then anyone who did that would be guilty of a rather grave injury upon you.

        (Of course, it’s not quite the same in reverse, is it? A pro-life woman and a pro-choice, reluctant father, are not in the same boat. He can’t force her to get an abortion, but she sure as hell can force him to care for their little by-blow, with the full power of the government and society at her back.)

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 6:46 pm Zombie Shane

        Would you have been happy to commit to 18 years of child support payments had things turned out otherwise? Would you have wanted to marry this woman you barely knew? Those were your other two options.

        Honey, you’re talking to a single dad who’s holding his kids in his arms as he types this.

        Don’t lecture me on responsibility.

        Or on what it means to be pro-life.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 7:01 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        I wasn’t lecturing. I was asking. And you’ve given me your answer, which is clearly: Yes.

        Personally, I’m pro-choice, but I respect you for honoring your convictions.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 7:29 pm Zombie Shane

        I wasn’t lecturing.

        Shut the fuck up you skanky feminazi whore.

        PS: And change the God-damned cat litter once in a while, will ya?

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 7:53 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        If you’re going to call me a whore, Zombie, at least do me the common courtesy of pulling my hair and slapping my ass. To do otherwise is just…rude.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 8:48 pm Zombie Shane

        There’s nothing worse than plugging one of you skanky feminazi whores and then I go to take a piss afterwards and the entire God-damned bathroom is filled with cat shit.

        Toxoplasmosis is turning y’alls brains into God-damned swiss cheese.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 9:46 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        There’s nothing worse than sitting down to what one thinks is going to be a normal conversation and having a pathetic-ass single dad saying, in the first 10 minutes, “Mah kids need a momma.”

        Because there’s nothing I want more in the world than to cook your fucking beanie-weenies and ferry your ugly little snot-caked brats to Little League. That’s why I had myself sterilized; because I just can’t wait to be Surrogate Mommy.

        Oh, and yes, this is something that’s happened to me. Twice in the last six months, actually.

        See how this works, Zombie Shane?

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:08 am Jason

        Rappaccini, well-played. There are some messed-up people reading this blog. Nice parry.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:09 am NiteLily

        Shane, you piqued my interest. How did you end up as a single dad? Was it through out-of-wedlock pregnancy or through a divorce? Also, how did you get custody? Do you have custody?

        It’s great if you have custody. I think men make better parents than single women. Of course, both parents is best. However, if that’s not possible then the father raising the child is much better than the mother alone.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 11:50 am itsme

        @rd

        if you don’t like being a surrogate mom, why date single dads?

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:42 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        @itsme. I wasn’t dating either of them. Both times, they rolled up on me in a coffeeshop and asked if they could share my table.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 8:47 am White Woman

        Hey Rappaccinis Daughter, what day is your sex change scheduled for?

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 9:41 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Same day you quit putting too much starch in the Grand Cyclops’ robes, WW.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:11 pm Jack

        Its sex change is complete. Post-op RD is here looking for tips on hooking up with a same-sex “life partner.”

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 9:46 pm Mike

        Guys, stop feeding the attention whore.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 5:05 pm thwack

        Rape:the other white meat.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 10:53 pm whorefinder

        RAPE: How most black men procreate.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 12:11 pm thwack

        ape shall not rape ape.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:14 pm whorefinder

        And yet you do. Funny how all black women cannot possibly conceive of sex not being forced upon them.

        LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 4:58 pm itsme

      in theory, yes. but in practice, a guy needs to get a hard-on before he can rape.

      LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 5:52 pm Zombie Shane

        I’ve always wondered about that very scenario – how would a rapist go about raping a chick if he simply couldn’t get it up at the very thought of her?

        Viagra?

        Or are we talking fisting here?

        I guess I’m old fashioned – it’s difficult for me to imagine getting it up for the nasty without just a little bit of human warmth involved.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 9:04 pm wow. just, wow.

        What is it with you guys and all the joking about rape?

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 10:54 pm whorefinder

        Because feminazis have made it a joke, bitch.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 12:12 am itsme

        joking?

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:21 am NiteLily

        I don’t think they really mean rape. They don’t go out looking for girls to rape.

        Let’s put it this way. Let’s say you’re at a party and you see one of these alpha guys who is always hot and bothered for a pretty girl. You start flirting with each other, you drink a little, one thing leads to another and you either find yourself at his place or another private area. From there he starts playing rough and you get turned on. Then he does the deed cuz he knows he turned you on with his antics. You might fight him a bit but that only turns him on even more and the two of you pretend he rapes you. That’s it.

        Or you see him out somewhere, he invites you out the next day and you go to his place or he comes to yours. Once you’re alone he doesn’t waste any time pinning you against the wall and goes for it. You get turned on, but you fight him off. That only turns him on even more and he throws you on the bed and passionately has his way with you……well, you know the rest. The next morn you feel satisfied, but coyly pretend you had no way out….you know that nonsense. Truth is, if you didn’t really wan’ it, you shouldn’t have hooked up with him, cuz you kind of knew what he was all about when you first met him –those kinds of men never hide their intent.

        LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 7:16 pm Joe

      Meh, some of the, act like they were raped a day or two later.

      Seriously. A stupid femtwat called me up a couple days later asking why I had “taken advantage” of her. Taken advantage of what? The fact that her hormones were raging and she decided she wanted to get her twat pounded and not masturbate? She didn’t have one alcoholic drink while in sight of me on our “date”. A light (dutch) dinner and conversation, followed by getting banged all night long, and once more in the “morning” after coffee.

      I guess all that moaning, screaming: “Oh god yes!”, “Harder!”, and “Don’t stop!” was her just faking a good time while being “taken advantage” of by me.

      At least she didn’t file a false rape claim.

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:44 am NiteLily

        Some of these feminists feel guilty about their actions because they have no self-control and they know it and they hate it. All their lives they were given everything they wanted unrestricted, first by their parents that never scolded them or made them pay for the consequences of bad behavior, and later by academia/higher institutions that usually bends over backwards for women and minorities. They tell women that even after she had sex and she feels it was rape, then it’s rape. That’s how we end with so many accusations. So I am not surprised by that bitch and don’t be surprised if she didn’t do the same thing over and over again with other men calling them a couple of days later to say he took advantage of her. She has to make her sorry-self feel better about her wantonness, never taking responsibility for her sexuality. Does Sandra Fluke sound familiar? As far as these women are concerned it’s always the man’s fault a woman can’t control her sluttiness. That’s what they were told by feminists running academia. Women need to take responsibility for their actions.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 8:17 am Heywood Jablome

        Women need to take responsibility for their actions.

        That’ll happen on the 12th of Never.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 2:37 pm NiteLily

        As long as feminism is their guide in life, you’re right.

        Years ago, women used to take responsibility for their behavior, that’s why a “good girl” would never hang out alone with a man who wasn’t her husband, or risk being called a harlot.

        OK, maybe it’s too radical for our tastes today. But, at least don’t accuse the man for rape when you were just as complicit.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 9:10 am taterearl

        “Women need to take responsibility for their actions.”

        The type that do have a basic concept of morality. The problem is the ones that don’t are immoral.

        I’d love for one day to just break every Commandment and then blame my unhaaaaaaaapies on the women who happened to be there while I was breaking them.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 2:17 pm NiteLily

        Remember when Adam blamed Eve for breaking God’s word? He couldn’t get away with it. God refused to accept his excuses and punished both of them differently but equally.

        People must take responsibility for their actions if we’ll ever protect the truth in our society. The first step to preserving truth is taking responsibility for yourself and you actions.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 9:51 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Check it out, I’m agreeing with NiteLily!

        If you were conscious at the time, and you didn’t clearly say “no,” then it’s not rape. Seduction is not coercion. Sex you didn’t like, or sex you regretted, is not actionable.

        Go take a long, hot shower, go for a run, learn from the experience and move on with your life.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:20 pm Ronin

        My friend once worked with this woman who had a bad past.

        On one of the projects, she went to the team leader and said she didn’t want to work with him.

        Her reason? My friend forgot her name and referred to her as “The Other Lady on the line” in one of the conference calls.

        -Which, by her bizarro-hamster-“reasoning” made her freak out, because she said, “‘Lady’ automatically implies ‘Lady of the evening’, aka: Prostitute.”

        My friend turned around and kicked the team leader’s ass and told her not to put that psycho on another job with him, as he wasn’t going to work with her either.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 2:23 pm NiteLily

        There is a term for this behavior. Maybe someone knows what it’s called.

        It’s when the listener internalizes something said unrelated to him/her because it applies to them, but the speaker doesn’t really know that. Many un-aware people do that often.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 7:49 am Tyrone

        At least she didn’t file a false rape claim.

        All it takes, is a bitchy, envious feminist girlfriend. They can come after you months and even years later too. Probably not in this case, but be careful.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 8:56 am Anon

        Reframe.

        Her: “You took advantage of me last night”.

        You: “Bring da moviez!”

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 12:19 pm thwack

        Patrice Oneal school is in session:

        LikeLike


      • on January 6, 2013 at 12:27 pm thwack

        Check out when “Sonja” starts talking at 1:32, even she has to fight back a laugh; and she is supposed to be fighting against this big black loud mouthed fat mother fucker?

        Pause the picture at 1:32 and just look at her face?

        Typical woman, getting her 6 minutes and 24 seconds of alpha; and she can’t hide it.

        LOL!

        This is a woman who NEVER gets called on her bullshit, and when a guy checks her on it, she loves it because her job as queen of angry women is a miserable one.

        LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 8:14 pm taterearl

      Although on the flip side…I do get a kick out of females emotionally raping orbiters.

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 7:19 am yaser

        There is an entire industry about a female emotionally reaping his beta friend, while the alpha stays aloof:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Twilight_Saga:_New_Moon

        LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 10:54 pm Andoronicus

      Rape has been a crime since time immemorial, for good reason.

      If you posting pro-rape trolling stuff gets your rocks off, I’m glad you do it here and not on a ‘legitimate’ site.

      (You do realize that you’re a troll trolling trolls here, right?)

      LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 10:58 pm whorefinder

        Actually, I’m mocking people like you and your “rape culture” bullshit, but don’t let facts hurt you hamster, baby. I know they won’t anyway.

        This site is more legitimate than every left-wing site on teh interwebs. Double of any feminazi site.

        You do realize that you’re unable of understanding mockery directed at you, don’t you, SWPL?

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:38 am NiteLily

        Real rape is wrong and punishable in every society. Even in places where they don’t punish men for rape, they have rape laws on the books and if the family of the girl is influential enough the man will be severely punished. I always thought these guys meant play rape or coercing sex when women get so hot and wet and can’t control themselves. I’ll be very surprised if they are talking about the real thing. Is whorefinder speaking about catching some unassuming girls and dragging her to some alley?

        Let’s be honest here. If a girl goes to a guy’s home on the first date or even the second date, she has to understand he thinks she is OK with having sex with him. Why would a girl go to a guy’s home, whom she hardly knows? Chances are it’s going to end in a way she might feel she was “taken advantage of,” despite enjoying all the passion, and she has only herself to blame. Women are funny – they love the passion and the feelings it produces within them, but they also feel conflicted about their enjoyment. Therefore, they like to pretend the man made them do it. This way they remove the guilty feelings of having casual sex from their consciences. However, you can’t have your cake and eat it too. You can’t enjoy casual sex and blame men for using you. If you really don’t want to feel used, you need to protect yourself. Feminism gives women a false sense of security. Feminists tell women they can do whatever they want sexually and never have to pay the price, that it’s always men’s fault. That’s why so many women feel safe getting wasted at spring break in the presence of men they hardly know and get used. Somehow they stupidly thought men will never do that to them because it’s against the law.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 7:01 am taterearl

        I stop looking at it as rape if the words “alcohol” and “invited back to my place” are involved in the story. Nobody forced the cocktails down your throat to lower you inhibitions.

        She’d probably think the guy is gay if he didn’t do anything.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 8:21 am Hugh G. Rection

        There is also no way you can reach a guilty verdict beyond reasonable doubt in most of those cases…

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 2:00 pm NiteLily

        Agreed! Women have to understand responsibility and consequences.

        The trouble is they have been told they can behave like whores and still have their cake and eat it too. They expect men to control themselves. Why should a man control himself if she is acting like she wants it? If who she sleeps with is that important to her, she wouldn’t play games with it, and with a guy she hardly knows no less. You play with fire you get burned.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 7:42 am Hugh G. Rection

        Isn’t there something in the bible about having to marry the woman and reimbursing the father?

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:29 pm Wigz

        Only if she was a virgin, and you didn’t have to marry her, just pay the price of her dowry.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:36 pm Wigz

        The ancient Hebrews knew that a slut has no value to marry. If a girl had premarital sex willingly and the guy didn’t want to marry her, she had lost any value and any man could marry her for free.

        I would argue that sleeping with a drunk naive young virgin is rape, but that almost never happens. Virgins who actually value their virginity will not put themselves in that sort of position.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 2:00 pm NiteLily

        Right on all counts.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:08 pm Hugh G. Rection

        I’d say in the days when these rules where invented there wasn’t a lot of opportunity to get with a woman alone anyways. There isn’t a lot of date rape going on in Saudi Arabia today I guess.

        The problem with drunk girls is that “drunk” isn’t a binary state.

        LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 10:53 am Rick Derris

      Once a feminist told me that “every man is a potential rapist.”

      My response was that this attitude meant that there was no such thing as “homophobia,” because if all men were potential rapists, then gay men were potential rapists of other men, so therefore it was not irrational for a straight man to fear a gay man because the straight man could be the forced bottom in the man-on-man gay rape situation.

      She did not approve of my logic.

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 12:06 pm taterearl

        Which with projection tells me that she wasn’t raped by a man in a looooooooooooong time.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:14 pm Rick Derris

        She got married to a good looking guy who got laid a lot, but now she is FAT and a family law lawyer to boot. No idea what else she is doing, and honestly I’d rather not know.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:32 pm taterearl

        “but now she is FAT and a family law lawyer to boot. ”

        Thanks for proving my point.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 12:12 pm itsme

        “every man is a potential rapist.”

        “every woman is a potential false rape accuser”

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 12:28 pm thwack

        Women do rape men and its legal.

        Women rape men for their time.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:09 pm taterearl

        You can’t rape the willing.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:14 pm whorefinder

        HA! Win. I’m stealing that without attribution.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 2:56 pm NiteLily

        “Once a feminist told me that “every man is a potential rapist.”

        Too bad these feminists don’t practice what they preach. If indeed this is true, then why not tell young women to be careful? Why give them a false sense of security telling them they can do whatever they want in the face of a man and he can’t touch you because it’s rape? Evil these feminists.

        You see, rape laws (as well as many other laws) don’t protect victims. They only punish the perpetrator after the fact. The victim is the only one in control of protecting themselves. Now, I am not saying that every victim was in control when the crime occurred, as sometimes people really mind their own business before becoming victims. But so many times victims had the power to protect themselves by avoidance. Liberals don’t understand this concept. They think laws are there to protect them. What they don’t understand is that the law comes into play only after they already suffered becoming a victim, so what good is the law after you got raped or beaten or murdered? When you explain this to liberal women they say you’re blaming the victim. They don’t understand the concept of avoidance/playing with fire.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:12 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Very good point Lily. It’s also funny that hardcore feminists throw around the 1-4 sexual assault fake stat on college campuses, yet insist on going to college and say it should be every woman’s privilege to do so.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 4:46 pm NiteLily

        Well, a woman can still go to college and not became a victim. 90% of women who supposedly got raped could have avoided it by not making stupid mistakes. I’m sorry to say, most of the time they bring it upon themselves by not being careful because of the feminist mentality that tells women they have liberty to do as they please without incurring the consequences. The truth is, men’s sexual urge is not a game.

        LikeLike


  2. on January 3, 2013 at 4:00 pm A.B. Dada

    You can’t go 3 girls deep without ONE of them saying “I can’t believe I want you this bad, I’m a feminist!”

    It’s always that exact line.

    1 in 3.

    LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 4:39 pm Whitehall

      I married one 25 years ago.

      In exchange for dumping my last girlfriend, was far prettier and 8 years younger, and much more sensible and hygenic, I made the wife RENOUNCE feminism.

      LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 6:49 pm Kate

        Sounds like a baptism. “Do you renounce feminism?” 🙂

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 8:01 pm Tyrone

        So how did her renouncing feminism improve your life? It’s easy to renounce something but difficult to change habits of thought.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 10:17 pm Whitehall

        She’s much more obedient now and doesn’t backtalk or put out much feminist fantasy BS.

        Best thing that ever happened to her.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:45 am NiteLily

        LOL! That’s great. You’re crazy for putting up with it for 25 years though. You should have put an end to it years ago.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 2:58 pm Whitehall

        Had kids with her then she grew cold and fat. I found comfort elsewhere and she said nothing. It worked for years but broaching the idea of sister wives at the suggestion of the GF brought matters to a head.

        Suddenly the wife lost weight and wanted sex three times a day just like the GF and renounced feminism.

        Miss the GF though.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 5:23 pm Greg Eliot

        I feel sad for the discarded gf… what did you say was her number, bro? 😉

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 8:54 pm Whitehall

        I feel sorry for her too. She is a quality woman and a great match for me and I for her. Yet, divorcing the wife would have been so messy and she is not a bad character and doesn’t deserve getting dumped.

        Tough call with regrets either way.

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 3:58 pm NiteLily

        You did the right thing not divorcing your wife, especially since your wife came around to your way of thinking.

        The GF………well I don’t feel sorry for her. She got involved with you knowing you were married so she took a risk you might not stay with her forever. Your wife on the other hand, was there first and built a life with you. She changed for you so she definitely deserves priority. You did the right thing.

        LikeLike


      • on January 6, 2013 at 8:28 pm Whitehall

        Does this mean I have “two-ititis”?

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 2:01 pm frigginnickname

        Too bad the 8 wouldn’t.

        “Urinate, but if you had bigger tits you’d be a Ten!”

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2013 at 11:54 am Jack

        you didn’t dump a prettier, younger woman for a feminist. I sense revisionist history.

        LikeLike


  3. on January 3, 2013 at 4:03 pm Anon

    How come suckmyclit.com doesn’t exist?

    LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 4:35 pm Greg Eliot

      Hear that knockin’? That’s opportunity at the door, bro! 😀

      LikeLike


  4. on January 3, 2013 at 4:17 pm mike

    The second girl i banged after learning game was a die hard feminist with a doting beta bf. After we fucked raw dog i noticed the pics of him were turned upside down. I asked why.she said … Out of respect.

    Feminists have super hyper little gymnastic hamsters

    LikeLike


  5. on January 3, 2013 at 4:22 pm RappaccinisDaughter

    I would be very interested to hear your take on the ifeminist movement–women who consider themselves feminists but support men’s rights, gun rights, and believe that false rape accusations should be treated as serious criminal acts.

    LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 4:59 pm Eric

      If they actually are in favor of all three things, let them call themselves feminists.
      If you had a car that had all the essential features you desired and it worked great, do you really care if it wants to call itself an airplane?

      LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 5:02 pm Thorson

      If such creatures exist, why fuck with them?
      If you had a great car with all the features you desire and it works perfectly; who cares if it wants to call itself an airplane?

      LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 5:04 pm josh

      Arent ALL feminists “I” feminists?Or more accurately,”ME” feminists?

      LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 5:21 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Sweet burn, josh, but ifeminism is actually a brand of feminism that supports the original, first-wave goals of feminism (gosh I do love voting and being able to own my own property), but explicitly rejects most of what modern feminism has become. You can read about it here: http://www.ifeminists.com/introduction/faq.html#1

        You’re not going to like all of the positions, but you’ll probably notice that there’s about a 75% correlation to the stuff CH posts here.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 6:36 pm askjoe

        It is funny how the 3rd and 4th and 5th wave sluts rely on the legacy of the first wave to justify their existence. Then again, the Lena Dunham wave relies on the mythical marriage minded gay to justify themselves.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 6:43 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        +1. Because getting more ridiculous women’s-studies departments funded at public universities, with public money, is EXACTLY the same as going on a hunger strike in your jail cell to make your case that women should be allowed to inherit property.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 11:40 am Anon

        Women shouldn’t vote nor inherit property. Women must be subjugated.

        Fuck off, feminazi.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 11:43 am Anon

        However, they may benefit from the usufruct of property in the absence of a male heir.

        Ain’t I generous?

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:11 pm NiteLily

        How Biblical of you, sorta. Isn’t this what God told Moses? In the absence of male heirs, it goes to the female.

        The British crown used to work like this, but they are trying to change it. It might go to the first born, male or female. Sigh……feminism is even affecting the English monarchy.

        LikeLike


  6. on January 3, 2013 at 4:25 pm askjoe

    I wonder if knowing the femmel waves would make any difference if you’re face blasting a fourth wave, Lena-Dunham type slut who owns their sluttiness like a badge as a protest against Bush’s tax cuts or whatever. I do find the anti-thought speech patterns of the academic set to be amusing though, to hear them dismiss logic and evidence in a sea of polysyllabic babble.

    Fun stuff, the host probably banged more feminazis but I’ve found that most of them disavow the stuff, admitting to various thought crimes.

    Anyway, reminds me of this Simpsons quote “This is nothing but dead, white male-bashing from a PC thug. It’s women like you that keep the rest of us from landing a husband.”

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 5:29 pm Glengarry

      In 4 years, I can see the ad:

      Lena Dunham opens her mouth.

      Cut to: (unmade bed, confused weepy girl looking at camera.)

      VO: “So how was it?”

      LikeLike


  7. on January 3, 2013 at 4:33 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Feminists and dating = health food nuts and eating. Both profess to have “higher standards than that” and both partake in what they claim is “bad” when instinct kicks in.

    LikeLike


  8. on January 3, 2013 at 4:33 pm Falconer

    If anything, femcunts are the most responsive to hardcore alpha asshole Game. They spend so much time surrounded by castrated betaboys and mincing manginas that a genuinely masculine presence is darkly irresistible to them. Too bad most of these whores are mind-blastingly ugly.

    LikeLike


  9. on January 3, 2013 at 4:45 pm Bhetti

    RappaccinisDaughter, do you have links to communities of ifeminists?

    LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 5:04 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      http://www.ifeminists.com/introduction/faq.html#1

      LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 5:28 pm Anon

        You mean feminists with an ihamster?

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 6:45 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        I want an ihamster. A user-friendly interface that reminds me daily that I’m good enough, I’m smart enough, and doggone it, people like me. It would come with an app that would allow me to hear that in Stuart Smalley’s voice, or Christopher Walken’s, or Gilbert Gottfried’s.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 5:37 pm itsme

        i hear apple is planning to sue them for trademark infringement

        LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 6:51 pm Kate

      Is this *the* Bhetti? I thought you only existed in legend! 🙂

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:25 pm Maya

        I know this name … she was once a commenter here, right? Bhetti, are you the Bhetti from http://girlgame.wordpress.com/about/?

        LikeLike


  10. on January 3, 2013 at 5:53 pm HollyWoodGuy

    One of the best fuckbuddies I ever had was one of those independent gyyrl power types.

    She was a doctor, in her residency, and had no interest in using her profession to make money. She’s one of those types who likes to go out and save the world and do volunteer work in Africa and Central America and such.

    We were banging because she was doing her residency in my neighborhood and we happened to meet and hookup. We agreed that we were never getting married or having kids together, and she would occasionally tell me how she wanted to be a single mom and get impregnated at some point, but not keep the father around. She also thought she would adopt some 3rd-world orphan and bring it up.

    So she’s pretty much a feminist, right?

    The best part? The reason she had the luxury of doing all this is that her dad is filthy rich. Meanwhile, I have to go to work every day and plan for the future. No time for volunteer work.

    Okay, really the best part? 50% of our sex life consisted of role-playing games and various bondage scenarios. 100% of the time, she was the submissive or the bottom or basically the one being abused.

    One of our favorite games was the rape game in which I would pretend to be a burglar and chase her around the house so I could grab her and brutally rape her. I mean brutally. She would fight back and I would have to slap her around and hold her down and all that kind of thing.

    She also liked to be my sex slave. I’d basically tie her up for a few hours and have my way with her. The worse I treated her, the more she liked it.

    Plus we had the various common games like job interviews, where would suck me off to guarantee she got the job, or she would be a maid and I would sexually harass her and eventually force myself on her.

    She was definitely my favorite feminist.

    Last I saw, she was in her late 30s, still single, and had profiles on every single dating website (POF, OKCupid, Match, etc).

    LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 8:42 pm Ronin

      Great story!

      LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 11:42 pm Rick Derris

      Post of the day! Hell, of the week!

      It sounds like you were prepping her for Brazzers or Naughty America.

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 3:13 am Jason

      Jesus, them girls are sick. Reminds me of the gyrrls I skipped over when I was dating.

      It’s good to be in the bunker of a healthy marriage.

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 11:34 am Anon

        I don’t understand, Alphie. You admitted that you married a slut.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 2:40 pm Matthew King (King A)

        Catchers don’t understand pitchers. Jason plunged himself into an identity crisis between both in an attempt to commiserate with both, as his politics requires of men. It smacks of bisexuality.

        It’s not normal for a man to imagine the essence of femininity, even in its rawer forms, to be “sick.” But such are the nature-inverting demands of ideology — which is the real “sick” thing here.

        Women insofar as they are feminine want to be dominated sexually. If the exigencies of her circumstance (feminism, trust fund daddy) require a more forceful domination, scrutinize the circumstance rather than the reasonable reaction of her nature to that circumstance.

        The cuntlier they are, the harder they fall. Which is why “Men Going Their Own Way” who get annoyed at feminist provocation baffle me. Those girls are a thrill ride. The corrective swing from one extreme to the other, from the public to the private, is wild and exhilarating. It’s a good sign when they are throwing the shittiest possible shit tests at you. It’s called “opportunity.”

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 11:11 pm Jason

        It seems that Matt and Anon are far more interested in my marriage than is healthy. Maybe a clarification on “sick” is needed:

        1) I love passionate women, but I sure wouldn’t want a woman who wanted to be brutally beaten, Chris Brown style. Unless the writer is exaggerating, that’s evidence of a damaged childhood.
        2) Any woman who says she actively wants to be a single mother is insane.
        3) Late 30s, still on dating sites, already hit the wall, superrich daddy, wants to adopt from other cultures? Put the pieces together. She’s a mess. She shits where she sleeps but mouths empty platitudes about saving the world. I’ve known a few women like her. She’s Angelina Jolie without the facial symmetry.

        Most important, Matt King: this guy’s fuckbuddy doesn’t represent “the essence of femininity” (your words). Seriously, admit that. Only a small fraction of women, such as Rihanna, truly want their skulls crushed, or dream of getting impregnated and dumped, in that order.

        I think we can all agree that most women instead dream of extracting resources from an unwitting man.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2013 at 5:32 pm NiteLily

        Of course she is damaged good. Those kinds of games you only play with your husband. It got to be with a man you deeply trust, so you can let go with him in that direction and explore such dominant/submissive relationship. you don’t do that with a fuck body, that’s why she is damaged good.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2013 at 5:32 pm NiteLily

        I mean fuck buddy.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2013 at 6:49 pm Anon

        Fuck body is alright.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2013 at 3:00 am NiteLily

        C’mon Anon, you’re disappointing me that you would settle for a fuck body. You shouldn’t settle for either a fuck body or fuck buddy.
        What you need is a hot gorgeous young girl to tantalize you in bed and keep you warn at night, not a blow up doll or a misfit looking for thrills. 🙂

        LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 3:47 am NiteLily

      “Last I saw, she was in her late 30s, still single, and had profiles on every single dating website (POF, OKCupid, Match, etc).”

      LOL! that’s where they usually end. I bet you now she is looking to get married. But who will marry a feminist slut like her? She probably had dozens upon dozens of other men after you.

      LikeLike


  11. on January 3, 2013 at 6:23 pm YaReally

    I wouldn’t know if I have. They’re only feminists around guys who let them be.

    LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 7:29 pm Christian C

      truth!

      LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 11:16 pm L.V.X.

      A very excellent point.

      LikeLike


  12. on January 3, 2013 at 6:40 pm ng85

    Amazing post! I actually same-night-smashed a femcunt last week (Merry Christmas to me!). Bitch was a fucking mess, but I was insanely drunk and horny and figured it was better than going home with my dick in my hand.

    All night she wouldn’t shut the fuck up about her job as a social worker helping domestic violence victims. She also wouldn’t shut up about human trafficking (Whatever the fuck that means, it’s another buzz term feminists love throwing around). I decided to do an experiment, to see if your teachings would break a feminist. I acted like an asshole to her all night, and finally she asked if I wanted to go home with her. I told her to catch a cab and made her pay for it when we got back to her place ($25).

    For all this talk about feminism, she sure loved the dirty stuff. She told me to pull her hair and spank her. She was also REALLY into biting. I was also whispering shit into her ear, calling her a dirty slut and a fucking whore. The nastier and dirtier I got, the more she was into it. We finished and went to bed.

    The next morning I wake up and she asks me when she’ll see me again. She gives me her number and tries to kiss me, but I just walked away and left. The first thing I did when I got outside was delete her number (She doesn’t have mine). Just goes to show you that those who claim to be the biggest feminists are also usually the most fucked up, slutty, nutso, etc.

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 6:11 pm Carmo

      biters are usually rape victims, experience has shown.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2013 at 6:57 pm ng85

        Makes so much sense. An ex of mine LOVED biting, which I was very impartial to. She later dropped hints that she may have molested or raped her when she was younger…….By her father. I’m SO GLAD I’m not with her anymore.

        LikeLike


  13. on January 3, 2013 at 6:40 pm askjoe

    As long as we’re bagging on feminists, note how the bitches in Congress are tittering that testosterone is why, as the presidizzle would say, “we’re in the mess we’re in,” when in truth, it’s the female mindset that blindly follows the borg collective. Just watched a documentary, for example, with Sec HHS Sebelius, who seems incapable of independent thought. Like feminazi’s that give Clinton a free rape or who fantasize about Obama.

    women, win the crowd to win the argument,
    men, win the argument to win the crowd.

    LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 7:08 pm Tertullian

      @askjoe: “women, win the crowd…” etc.: excellent points.

      For some reason I imagine Proximo (the Oliver Reed character in “Gladiator”) saying these words to Maximus as he is about to enter the Colisseum to do battle against Jessica Valenti:

      “Win the argument…and you will win the crowd.”

      And not “win the crowd…and you will win your freedom,” which I believe is what he said in the movie.

      LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 7:52 pm scatmaster

        I absolutely despise Russell Crowe so did not even see Gladiator or realize “Olllie” was in that flick. Guess I will have to hold my nose and watch it as Reed is (was) my favorite actor. Ultimate Alpha.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 8:19 pm Tertullian

        Reed is first-class…he was great in the original “The Three Musketeers” — the one from the 70’s with Michael York and Faye Dunaway.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:21 pm Greg Eliot

        Agree wholeheartedly… but for the record, that flick wasn’t the original… back in the 1940’s they did one with Gene Kelley as D’Artagnan and Van Heflin as Athos, if memory serves.

        LikeLike


      • on January 3, 2013 at 10:16 pm Matthew King (King A)

        Reed put so much of himself into the role that he died during production.

        Shadows and dust, Maximus.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 5:59 pm Tyrone

        Gladiator is a very good film, even if historically inaccurate in terms of the plot. It is the best filming of the Roman war machine I’ve seen, until they break formation and melee.

        Romans didn’t do that. Keeping formation meant keeping alive. The tactic was to ram the man opposing you with the long, rectangular body shield (Scutum) they used and create opportunities to finish him with the Gladius, the men would fight and fall back after the Centurian blew his whistle and the men behind would fill his place in the line. The enemy was always opposing fresh or rested soldiers.

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 11:53 am Matthew King (King A)

        The HBO series “Rome” started with a depiction of the whistle-and-fall-back in the very first scene of the first episode. Fantastic show by the great John Milius, I wish there were more than two short seasons.

        LikeLike


      • on January 6, 2013 at 11:35 am Greg Eliot

        The great Milius, indeed… the guy’s got a helluva resume’.

        LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 3:51 am NiteLily

      I wouldn’t vote for women. I hate most women candidates; they are worse than the men. There is a rumor that Bloomberg is supporting some bitch to take his place as Mayor. Watch the city going downhill, as is been happening ever since Rudy Giuliani left. Giuliani is supporting some Italian dude. I hope he wins.

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 12:41 pm Matthew King (King A)

        I would vote for you, Lily Palin.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 7:52 pm Anon

        Weak.

        You really believe in women’s ability to lead? If by any chance yes, would you submit to her leadership?

        Don’t tell me that elected officials are just servants of your majestuous citizenry. They hold real power over YOU in a big brother nanny state like ours.

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 12:01 pm Matthew King (King A)

        Grrrr. Watch out for Mama Grizzly!

        I would gladly submit to this:
        http://www.traditioninaction.org/Cultural/G005cpPregnantMinister.htm

        She is a mother and therefore will not get us into unnecessary wars like men. She has lots of diverse experience, such as gestating new life. Could you do that? DIDN’T THINK SO.

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 1:10 pm Anon

        Jesus Christ!

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 3:56 pm NiteLily

        Anon, didn’t you say I am a warmonger? Well, here you go. She is the perfect type of government official for you. She’ll keep you out of “unnecessary” wars so you can be free to chase pussy unhindered and uninterrupted by other “less important” things. I suspect this is why most PUA’s are so anti strong military and anti strong response to the enemy.

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 8:41 pm Anon

        I don’t particularly care for your obscure connection between getting pussy and engaging in middle east wars, and I’m not a pacifist, far from it.

        That being said, I believe that war on terror could be led by covered ops and outsourced torture. But it’s crazy to spend trillion dollars from my tax money and thousands of white boys lives in meaningless wars that BTW, didn’t lead to any outstanding results. We just fucked up the delicate equilibrium of r-selected populations living under the rule of the tyrants that they deserve.

        Besides, I don’t share your sympathy for Israel. Jews are not my kin. If I cared about them, it would be fair to care about the arabs too.
        80% of our problems with 1 billion people could be solved by stopping being Israel’s bitch.

        But of course you would see that as weak, and you would engage in another neocon tirade trying to shame me, Greg Eliot, PUAs, and the nazis.

        But you know that I don’t care about any of that. I only care about one thing…

        LikeLike


      • on January 6, 2013 at 1:50 pm NiteLily

        “I don’t particularly care for your obscure connection between getting pussy and engaging in middle east wars,”

        I love the way you guys spin the truth and use your hamster to rationalize your actions. I am not the one who started tying in religion, politics, and race into this blog. This has been going on for a long, long, time with most of it being very offensive to a lot of people, especially those wanting to hear solely about pussy and related shenanigans.

        You do remember, don’t you, you and Greg jumping on me first, way before I said one word to you edgewise. Well, at this point it doesn’t matter who started what and who said what to whom. __________________________________________________________

        Regarding the war on terror, I have said many times that I don’t believe in bringing democracy to the Arab world; it’s a waste of time. Some nations are not meant to be democratic – they don’t understand it and their religion doesn’t allow it. That’s why we shouldn’t waste our time, money, and lives on them. However, if they attack us then I do believe in a strong response that will ensure it’s their last time, and the only way to do it is to hit them hard with terrible consequences. I don’t believe in dragging out a war with them for decades or trying to rehabilitate their governments or society, like we’re trying to do in Afghanistan or Iraq. Yes, they will have many casualties and it looks heartless on the face of it, but we have to remove the emotion from it and do what we have to do to convey to them that we mean business. It’s the only way to save lives in the long run. So it will be painful at first (for them and for us, because we don’t really want to hurt anyone unlike them) but after they get pounded they’ll think twice even looking at us the wrong way. It’s the only way to win a war with people bent on our destruction. You can’t show them compassion if you want them to stop their terror because our compassion is translated into weakness by them. This is a main concept to understanding the Middle East’s mentality.
        ___________________________________________________________

        “80% of our problems with 1 billion people could be solved by stopping being Israel’s bitch.”

        Unfortunately, if that were only true, but it it’s not, and I’ll tell you why. The Muslims don’t need a reason to hate us. They covet our civilization, our wealth and our women. That’s why they immigrate here as well as to other western countries, marrying the women and trying to spread sharia law. They use Israel as an excuse – it’s another front in their war of jihad against us. Jihad comes in many forms, not just in the form of war. Marrying western women and trying to spread sharia law are all part of their jihad to destroy the West.

        As long as there are non-Islamic wealthy countries on earth, they are jealous of them. They look for ways either to convert them to Islam or destroy them, because in their religion there can’t be something better than Islam – no church can be taller than a mosque, no Christian country should be wealthier or mightier than most Islamic countries on earth, etc. That’s why they hate us – because we have the power and the wealth and they feel it’s humiliating for their Islamic psyche to see a non-Muslim country doing better. And coveting blonde women is also on their menu. They love us blondes.

        I support Israel because I don’t want the Islamic world to get stronger. Any win for it, is another nail in our coffin. As far as I can see, Israel is keeping Islam at bay. If it weren’t for Israel, Islam’s sight would be more clearly set on us. Right now the Middle East has a country that’s stronger than any Islamic country on earth and that’s irksome to them. Right now they are busy with Israel, but rest assured that the moment they destroy Israel their menu would include the USA If you can’t see the danger, yeah I think one is either weak or foolish.

        If you think this makes me a neocon, so be it. I see some of you as neo-Nazis. I rather be called a neocon than a neo-Nazi anyway. Also, I think it’s very telling when you write:

        “…..you would engage in another neocon tirade trying to shame me, Greg Eliot, PUAs, and the nazis.”

        So you include yourself in with the Nazis, right? I guess I got my answer from you, you sympathize with Nazis and Nazi-lovers like Greg. That in itself is shameful.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2013 at 12:40 pm Matthew King (King A)

        NiteLily for Secretary of State.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2013 at 10:34 am Jumbobeef

        Can’t believe that Neocon blabberly is so obscure, THIS IS WHY I AM LIBERTARIAN and I Support the Left, I am a pacifist and I am not an enemy with arabs because i have traveled to the muslim countries and have lived with them SO nitelily all this nonsense you wrote is moot.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2013 at 2:50 pm NiteLily

        Finally, it explains why you are so mad and unhinged (regardless of what you say), and why you come to the rescue of Greg Eliot. IN FACT, EVERYONE WHO COMES TO HIS RESCUE IS IN SYMPATHY WITH HIS WORLD VIEW. That’s what I am going to assume form now on.

        You try to shut me up because you don’t like my political opinions, yet you mask it by trying to turn this personal, as if my sex life (which you know nothing about) has anything to do with my political views. I can see through you, stupid idiot. YOU COME OFF AS AN UN-EVOLVED OVERGROWN TEENAGER WHOSE POLITICAL VIEWS HE ACQUIRED FROM THE DISNEY CHANNEL. You’re not even on my level for discussion, let alone on my level for sex.

        For the record, I hate Libertarians. Most of them (not all) are pathetic and stupid, not to mention devoid of values and ethics, so I am not surprised they feel more kinship with liberals than with conservatives. And the Liberation PUAs are the worst. I had them pegged from day one when is said all they care about is fucking as many women as possible. That is the only thing they live for, not what is right or wrong. Therefore, anything political that comes in their way of traveling the world and picking up females for one-night stands or short-lived fucks is upsetting to their environment. That’s why they try to push this pacifist garbage on all of us, as if we became pacifists all wars would end. You need to preach your message to the Arab world and tell them this crap and see how they respond to you. LOL! You’d be lucky to be alive afterwards.

        I have Arab friends who live in this country who are not interested in this sharia-law business the Islamists try to push on us. They know the fight the Arabs have with Israel and America is as bogus as everything else they try to hurl at the west in their quest of jihad, including the Crusades which they also started.

        If you’re such a smart political analyst why don’t you use facts that refute anything I said? If you have no facts, STFU. I’ll accept your opinions because you have a right to voice them, but don’t you dare try to shut me up because you don’t like my opinions being the limp dummy you are. What a joke. A libertarian PUA is trying to teach me about politics.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2013 at 3:10 pm Jumbobeef

        Lolz, is just my response to you, as i said throw a bait and you get pussy and here i am throwing a bait and getting NiteLily to twist her panties, Go and Grab something cold to switch off all that heat you build up writing this long dribble. I am not going to use facts with you because i know you are not worth my time and so i am much more fishing to do in my age, so its better for us libertarians to conquer as many pussy as we can before you Gun Freaks start a world war III with your Joos partners.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2013 at 3:14 pm Jumbobeef

        And regarding of SHUTTTTTTING you up, NO sir! I am not trying to go there, because it seems your hamster runs on nuclear fuel and it has an unlimited stock of it, so you can go on and on and on and on for as long as you can, which is why i say naggers are the biggest whiners.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2013 at 3:17 pm NiteLily

        “i am much more fishing to do in my age, so its better for us libertarians to conquer as many pussy as we can before you Gun Freaks start a world war III with your Joos partners.”

        Ha Ha Ha……See, at least you admit it (which I admire). Am I right, or am I right? Call me a stupid female all you want, but I got you pegged so good, babe.

        Carry on now. We’re done.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2013 at 6:05 pm Matthew King (King A)

        …as if my sex life (which you know nothing about) has anything to do with my political views.

        This is the feminist lie, and your unconscious promotion of it is why your commentary lacks credibility among us.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2013 at 6:13 pm NiteLily

        Funny, because your commentary means nothing to me but nonsense. Using your own argument, it’s because of your empty sex life and your hatred and resentment of females. Otherwise, why else would you be a constant contrarian, Mr. King?

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2013 at 6:17 pm NiteLily

        BTW, why do you bother reading everything I comment and hanging on my every word? It’s obvious what I say is very strong and most of you can’t handle it. Now put your money where your mouth is and stay away from my non-credible posts, please.

        And don’t even try the feminist bullshit on me. If I am a feminist, you are a lefty.

        LikeLike


      • on January 10, 2013 at 6:43 pm Matthew King (King A)

        BTW, why do you bother reading everything I comment and hanging on my every word?

        That’s easy. Because it pays to know one’s enemy intimately.

        For instance, you think you win the game by whoring attention, and you score points accordingly. If someone responds, that’s a win; if not, a loss. Regardless of the truth of any statement.

        Also: you have the tendency to invoke my name in conversations of which I am no part. Because you know that I am one of the few who can see to the bottom of your bag of cheap tricks, even as you diddle yourself over the desired responses of predictable men.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on January 10, 2013 at 7:18 pm NiteLily

        “Also: you have the tendency to invoke my name in conversations of which I am no part.”

        I picked it up from you; you often do that too. If you’ll quit, I’ll quit.

        “Because you know that I am one of the few who can see to the bottom of your bag of cheap tricks, even as you diddle yourself over the desired responses of predictable men.”

        Don’t justify yourself. You and the rest of your idiots here are no match for me, which is why you have this irrational anger at me. I told you already I won’t be reading your contrarian nonsense so stop commenting to me, yet you persist. Why I know not, except that maybe I upset you to no end, and if that is true, I am satisfied. Maybe no one ever put you and your bullshit on the spot before, but I have you pegged like I have most everyone posting here pegged.

        “Because it pays to know one’s enemy intimately.”

        You’ll never know me intimately. You have no idea about me, and yet I have you mapped like a little village. Your only remedy for me would be to fuck me senseless since you don’t know anything else to do. Somehow, you think it will change my mind or the truth about you. It won’t. You’d still be the same irrational contrarian you are. Besides, I didn’t know I was your enemy since I always considered you interesting if not overbearing. But if you call me your enemy so be it. Let’s be enemies. But let’s be silent enemies. I won’t comment to you and you won’t comment to me. Deal?

        LikeLike


      • on January 11, 2013 at 10:29 pm Matthew King (King A)

        No deal. I don’t parley with self-esteem addicted girls who don’t know their place. I will speak with whom and about whom I want.

        You should know, though, that your attempts to leverage your attention are transparent. Like I’ve said elsewhere, you think our deliberation in the pursuit of truth is one of your sissy games where shunning (and pretend-shunning) people is some kind of power play that gets more readers to like you and fewer to like your opponents, and popularity determines truth. You stupidly believe junior-high cat-and-mouse rhetoric applies here. You imagine it matters what you think of us, and you attempt to prove it by denying us attention and thinking it cruel.

        Look, if you have substance, I am here to gain from it. If you don’t, you are just one more beer fart in the whirlwind. It’s nothing personal, but you have no idea how to converse without making it personal. I have even said I like you on a number of occasions, but that is as irrelevant as your dislike for me: you cannot fathom this world where likeability is irrelevant. It’s a woman thing.

        Get it? Now go make me a sandwich already.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on January 14, 2013 at 1:15 am NiteLily

        LOLOLOL!!! How did I know ‘no deal” will be your answer? But I had to present it to you anyway so that your mouth will actually say, “no deal.” I can just imagine how tough you are in real life. You’re not one for deal making, are you?

        “Look, if you have substance, I am here to gain from it. “

        I don’t have substance, I am a woman, remember? Only men have substance. LOL!

        “I have even said I like you on a number of occasions, but that is as irrelevant as your dislike for me”

        Dislike for you? Who has been insulting whom on every occasion? I have never insulted you ever, yet you constantly insult me and almost everyone on this blog. Maybe it’s your way of communicating, who knows, but I think there are more constructive ways to deal with people without insulting them, even if you disagree. It seems most people on this blog can’t debate or have a heated conversation without calling people they don’t like names. I am one of the people who least engages in it, but I admit that lately even I have fallen into this trap. But why should it matter to you? Didn’t you say this is a vulgar place and female sensibilities have no place here? I agree. Why does it matter to you?

        “You should know, though, that your attempts to leverage your attention are transparent.”

        I thought you were more perceptive than that. It’s not attention I want, I have plenty of that. It’s to destroy lies and make sure the truth is not hidden underneath the piles of garbage manufactured by your demented friends.

        “…..and popularity determines truth. You stupidly believe junior-high cat-and-mouse rhetoric applies here”

        I think you’re projecting, dear Matt. You’re the one who thinks that sticking with his boys is more important than the truth. Not me. I will burn bridges if I have to for the truth. I won’t compromise it, get it? I hope so. I hope so. I am giving you a glimpse into myself, as you will never know me “intimately” ever. I have real high standards, and with everything in life too.

        “Get it? Now go make me a sandwich already.”

        My fridge is empty. Go food shopping and I will cook you dinner. 🙂

        LikeLike


      • on January 14, 2013 at 6:57 pm Matthew King (King A)

        Maybe it’s your way of communicating, who knows, but I think there are more constructive ways to deal with people without insulting them, even if you disagree. It seems most people on this blog can’t debate or have a heated conversation without calling people they don’t like names. I am one of the people who least engages in it…

        Read this ten times. I’m saying please:

        http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/12/intellectual-discourse-taking.html

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 3:53 pm NiteLily

        LOL! This has to be the best comment of the day. Ha Ha …..I can’t stop laughing at the absurdity of it all – a woman pacifist head of the armed forces. Only in dead feminized Islamist Europe.

        “There has been some cautious criticism in Spain from rightist circles regarding the appointment, but surprisingly little. It just doesn’t do in today’s socialist Spain to belittle women’s rights and gender equality, which have become almost the new religion of the once-Catholic country…… Today’s socialist Spain is being feminized, pacified and socialized.”

        I said it many times, feminism, equality, multiculturalism have become the new religion of the west. They replaced God with this crap.

        “Promoting women is just one part of the much larger agenda of Zapatero’s socialist government. In his first term, Zapatero legalized gay marriage, liberalized divorce laws, and required political parties to practice gender parity. He and his anti-Church cabinet are bent on a social “reform” that strips the Catholic Faith of its once strong influence on Spanish society. For example, today a pro-homosexual “civics class” is mandatory in all schools – Catholic and public. It indoctrinates children with the sexual ideology and social agenda of the left. (3)”

        To all of you who think gay marriage is not detrimental to our society, do you see now why legalizing it is the most dangerous thing that could befallen this country ? “A pro-homosexual “civics class” is mandatory in all schools.” Watch the number of homosexuals skyrocket in Spain within 10 years. Get ready everyone. This is coming here, unless we stop it long enough for the idiots in this country to see how badly it affects Europe.

        The Pope is the only one taking a hardline against homosexuality. God bless him.

        LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 4:02 am wow. just, wow.

      May I ask, joe, exactly who in Congress is “tittering that testosterone is why…” we’re in the mess we’re in? That sounds like some sexist crap to me.

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 5:18 pm Greg Eliot

        Take it easy… we here at the chateau do what we can to avoid “sexist crap”… ’cause we know how much you broads hate it.

        LikeLike


  14. on January 3, 2013 at 6:43 pm Falconer

    Check out how much rage and disgust a gaggle of lonely betas on OK Cupid can inspire in the femcunt legions:

    http://jezebel.com/5972788/no-one-is-entitled-to-sex-why-we-should-mock-the-nice-guys-of-okcupid

    The “very real problem of male sexual entitlement”. Classic female projection.

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 2:31 pm Wigz

      Betas will always be hated because they attack the hamster with truth.

      Sluts will always try to justify having sex with alpha assholes by saying the betas are assholes in disguise.

      If that was true, the white knights, manginas and betas would simply have to drop the pretense and they would get laid overnight.

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 3:16 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Female Projection? It’s written by Hugo Schwyzer!

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:22 pm White Woman

        Schwyzer is a kike.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 5:17 pm Greg Eliot

        Careful now… he’s merely an exception… most Jews in the media have gained their hard-won influence through talent and good intentions…

        and if you say otherwise, you’ll never work in this town again.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 7:25 pm whiskeysplace

        Compare/contrast Hugo Schwyzer with say, Bibi Netanyahu. Their views on military force, diversity, pc, multiculturalism, and feminism. Jews in this country so successfully assimilated they are indistinguishable from say, Anderson Cooper or Brian Williams. Jews in Israel on the other hand know for a certainty that everyone else wants to kill them, in the worst way possible.

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 3:43 pm NiteLily

        Whiskey, don’t waste your breath on these two idiots who don’t know or care about the differences between liberal Jews and conservative Jews. They just hate all Jews. Both of them are limp creatures.

        Anyway, you are very correct. About 70% of the Jews in this country are liberal. They think exactly like Anderson Cooper and Brian Williams.

        Jews in Israel are about 70% conservative, so they think the opposite of the lame Jews here. They think Biblically about military force, diversity, political correctness, multiculturalism, feminism, and homosexuality. They don’t have lefty brain-dead ideology like they do here, which is why the Reform Jews in the US are in a big fight with Bibi Netanyahu. I say good for him for standing his ground and pissing off those stupid feminists. Any place anyone stands up to them is a blessed place for me. I also like the way he fights Arab militants and those illegal immigrants overtaking Israel from Sudan. Too bad our Barak Obama Gov’t isn’t doing the same thing. Although, Netanyahu could be doing a lot more than he is. I still feel he’s not strong enough. He reminds me more of Bush – a decent guy but not strong enough.

        LikeLike


      • on January 6, 2013 at 11:40 am Greg Eliot

        Heh, heh… these shabbos goyim and cogdis Yahudis don’t see the irony in their attempt at defense.

        Jews in Israel = pitbull equivalents of WNs for their own kind in their own country. And bravo to them… except…

        Jews in the rest of the West = undermine host populations and the integrity of others’ nations through the aforementioned diversity, PC, multikulti, etc., etc., etc. And, oh, by the way, get said other nations to, especially Amerikwa, to foot the bills in money and blood for fighting the enemies, both real and imagined, of Israel.

        Nice work, if you can get it… lllozozozozozlzlzlzlzlzozozozozollll

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 3:38 pm NiteLily

        Off white woman – Schwyzer is only a ¼ Jewish, as I suspect many other people in America and the rest of the West are.

        But let’s say he was Jewish, what does it have to do with the issue here, other than it might be important to an anti-Semite like the Nazi below?

        Many non-Jewish men think like Schwyzer, yet do you call them names? I think you need to focus on your kids and on your cheatin’-heart racist hubby than worry about Schwyzer supposed tribe (as the Nazi below likes to refer to it). Seems you have much larger problems than the Kikes.

        _________________________________________________________

        Resentful Nazi Eliot – most journalists in the media get to work in liberal publication because they are liberal, not because they are Jewish.

        Conservative publications have writers that think along their lines, and I have seen many Jewish conservative writers in those too. Jews come in 2 flavors – liberal and conservative, like most other whites. But of course, facts mean nothing to you, as they mean nothing to most Nazis and other lefties.

        Your jealousy and resentment are rearing their ugly head once more. Are you again borrowing your wife’s cunt for the day?

        LikeLike


  15. on January 3, 2013 at 7:11 pm Graham

    For what it’s worth, I read this blog almost everyday and I have in fact actually banged a chick who interned at Jezebel. Let’s just say she was in a class with me where my political and social views regularly came out (which are more or less in line with the dark musings on this blog) and still found me charming enough to spread her legs for. She also knew about the coke. Didn’t care. So that’s that.

    LikeLike


  16. on January 3, 2013 at 8:12 pm taterearl

    Is she American?

    90% chance she is a feminist. The Amish and other very conservative religions would be 5%…the other 5% were converted by men who like a challenge.

    LikeLike


  17. on January 3, 2013 at 8:22 pm John

    I belly laughed twice during the Femcunt section. The chateau usually doesn’t make me laugh, but today it does.

    LikeLike


  18. on January 3, 2013 at 8:39 pm Gary

    Can someone tell me what PUA stands for and for that matter some of the other descriptors or where to find them (i.e. SWPL).

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 12:47 pm Matthew King (King A)

      The alienating quality of cultish jargon proceeds apace. Oh well.

      PUA = Pick Up Artist
      SWPL = Stuff White People Like, used as adjective or personified noun.

      If you must, do a smart google search. If you have an opportunity, though, read the archives of this site from 2007-2009.

      Matt

      LikeLike


  19. on January 3, 2013 at 8:41 pm Ronin

    AWESOME!

    Thanks for the great reply, Heartiste!

    LikeLike


  20. on January 3, 2013 at 8:50 pm wow. just, wow.

    “At the end of the day, they like being girls, and are all too happy to ignore the inherent contradictions between feminism and their love of shopping for shoes and falling for assholes.”

    So they are perfect for all of you guys taking this blog as gospel!

    LikeLike


    • on January 3, 2013 at 10:49 pm Falconer

      Whenever I see the phrase “wow, just wow” it conjures up some SWPL prole in full beta battle dress, muttering indignation in his faggiest NPR lisp.

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 7:58 am Adam

      “Wow. Just wow.”
      “No. Just no.”

      What is it with you dumb cunts and talking like that?

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:44 pm NiteLily

        Also when they say, “that’s just so wrong on so many levels.” I want to smack them when I hear these stupid phrases. These are all phrases of exaggeration.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:51 pm wow. just, wow.

        Wow. That’s just so wrong on so many levels.

        LikeLike


      • on January 6, 2013 at 12:44 pm thwack

        Its a clever attempt to avoid saying:

        1. “man oh man!”

        or

        “boy oh boy!”

        LikeLike


      • on January 6, 2013 at 1:07 pm Greg Eliot

        FTW

        LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 1:05 pm Matthew King (King A)

      I thought she was being ironical at first. There was an obscure discussion here awhile back about the faggoty tendency to use terms like, “Wow just wow” and “Ummmmm….” They are phrases in search of validation based on assumption (and question begging) used specifically to avoid addressing the controversy, treating the very issue at hand as asked-and-answered among all correct-minded people: Like, EVERYONE, knows that!!! I am like so astonished you deny it! Holding a contrary position becomes the very proof of invalidity. As such, they are a staple on lefty fora, where they serve as are placeholders for argument and weak, jargony shaming techniques.

      Steve Sailer had an excellent précis of the masculine and feminine (heterotopic and sensitivity-driven; sporting and personal) styles of group rhetoric.

      http://isteve.blogspot.com/2012/12/intellectual-discourse-taking.html

      Everyone here should become familiar with these divergent modes and develop techniques for neutralizing our opponents within them.

      Matt

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 6:03 pm yaser

        That was an awesome read. Were do i sign up to your newsletter?

        LikeLike


      • on January 6, 2013 at 10:11 pm Retrophoebia

        This article is also an excellent guide to recognizing faulty logic, courtesy JTR

        LikeLike


  21. on January 3, 2013 at 9:21 pm feministx

    feminists rarely complain about PUAs because feminism is not against your art.

    Feminism is good and true. Men are by nature violent, oppressive and dangerous and they should be all culturally neutered to the greatest degree possible.

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 1:11 pm Matthew King (King A)

      Men are by nature violent, oppressive and dangerous and they should be all culturally neutered to the greatest degree possible.

      Except for the fact that our “violent, oppressive, and dangerous” nature is necessary to found and sustain against barbarism the very civilization that allows you to imagine the very possibility of restraining nature.

      All your fantastical project of castration creates is a return to the state of nature, where a woman’s destiny is rape. But keep dreaming in happy contradictions, sister. That’s your nature.

      Matt

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 1:38 pm Anon

      RAPE!

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 1:52 pm Greg Eliot

      If all men were culturally neutered, the best music we could hope for would be Diane Warren and Clara Shumann.

      LLOOOOZXOXOXOXOZOZOZLZLZLZLZLZLZLOZOZOZOZOZLZLZL

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 3:07 pm Tyrone

      Name one thing you use and live in on a daily basis that was invented by a woman. You’re not capable of running an advanced technological society without us. Besides, you reward violent, dangerous, and oppressive men with your sexual favors. We’re not in the mood to joke anymore about this crap. You overestimate your worth beyond your pussies.

      LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 1:57 pm feministx

        “You’re not capable of running an advanced technological society without us. ”

        I’ve noticed. I’ve also noticed that the rate of feminism in society correlates strongly and directly with the rate of male technological productivity.

        They gave women the vote. Life expectancy, infant mortality and childhood disease all improved. They made it easy for us to divorce. We got ipods and spotify and guys with no legs running in the olympics.

        I just don’t see any evidence for why feminism is bad for society. Society just gets better and better as there are more fatherless children, more divorces, more promiscuity. The church lied. Our world is now more free of war and disease than it ever had been before.

        “Besides, you reward violent, dangerous, and oppressive men with your sexual favors. ”

        Not me. Whether alpha or beta, I only fuck successful men who are extraordinarily competent at whatever it is they do.

        LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 3:58 pm NiteLily

      “Men are by nature violent, oppressive and dangerous”

      And thank God they are. Who’s going to protect civilization?

      That said, if you know this about men why do you play with fire?
      _________________________________________________________
      “they should be all culturally neutered to the greatest degree possible.”

      Speak for yourself. Some of us like our men in their natural state, with a few civilized refinements that is. Those became the inventors and creators.

      I want to see you hooking up with a feminized male, btw? Please put your money where your mouth is.

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 6:05 pm yaser

      troll

      LikeLike


    • on January 5, 2013 at 8:23 am nugganu

      I still want to see the ultimate showdown: radical feminism vs. radical islam.

      LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 9:39 am Anon

        That battle would last about 1.5 seconds.
        Source: Afghanistan.

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 1:59 pm feministx

        Of course feminists would lose. But you want to live in Sweden or Afghanistan?

        I suggest you fight for my cause.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2013 at 5:56 pm Arkan

        Why would we fight for your cause? We are white men. We could take on the whole world if we applied ourselves. We didn’t need women’s approval when we created the most advanced civilizations in the history of mankind. You can’t contribute to our fight. And if we eventually chose to obliviate our humanitarian delusions you will obey.

        You’re not our allies. It may not seem like right now, but you’re at our mercy. You always have been and always will be.

        LikeLike


  22. on January 3, 2013 at 11:07 pm Rum

    Bhetti
    Is that really you? If it is you then you very close to having your Medical Degree. And, as you probably now realize, you can get away with just about anything with a Med degree. I do not want to be the one who recommends in public to you to use big knives, etc. to solve your problems. But if I do not, someone else will.

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 12:11 am yeahokcool

      wtf bro?

      LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2013 at 5:40 pm Bhetti

      Rum (and Maya/Kate), yes. The last little stretch now, which I’d like to blame for the endless slow quietude.

      Although I seriously question being able to get away with anything. The General Medical Council barely allows doctors rights to be human beings.
      —
      Anyway I’m pretty suspicious of ifeminists on first impression. It’s all very well to say you’re gender equalist. They’re just words if what you focus on is injustice to women. Although I’d make an argument that injustice to men is de facto injustice to women, and there’s evidence they see it that way. Still, the label ‘feminism’ just seems to me so far removed from recognising any form of oppression on men. Seems better to rather discard ‘feminism’ as a label altogether than try to rebrand it as yet another sub-type of feminism. Another problem is being allied to libertarianism. Which is too large for me to tackle really, let alone in an intended little comment on a forgotten post.

      LikeLike


  23. on January 3, 2013 at 11:15 pm L.V.X.

    In my opinion “Feminist’s” are the easiest bangs on the planet. Everything they do is rationalized equivocale to a PUA rationalizing hooking up with a married woman.

    LikeLike


  24. on January 3, 2013 at 11:21 pm Rum

    A Bat Mitzvah gift… 18 solid metal coins from the pre-fiat, pre psychotic era of money psychosis.
    Swallowing and a smile.

    LikeLike


  25. on January 3, 2013 at 11:39 pm pancake

    I suppose I married a beta male with sycophantic manboobs. The PUA techniques do, in fact, fail when used on me. If I trial PUA to pick up women, I might find out how rare someone like me truly is. But I’m not sure if I can actually bang a chick I find that way. Shallowness is a big-turn off.

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 7:52 am Hugh G. Rection

      Did you have a sex change between your first 2 and last sentences?

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 11:23 am Anon

        lol

        LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 9:55 am casaanova

      How do you look though? If you’re a 3 on a scale of 1-10 and the only PUA who wants to approach you is a wincing twitchy omega who just started learning game, then of course his techniques will “fail on you”. There’s nothing rare about it, water seeks it’s own level

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 10:42 am Peter South

      So game doesn’t work on ugly trannies?

      (Johnny Carson voice)I did not know that.

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 1:26 pm Greg Eliot

        (Ed McMahon voice) “You are correct, sir!”

        LikeLike


  26. on January 4, 2013 at 12:09 am WhoCares

    Technicality makes Justice happen in La-La Land? Judge Exonerates a Man in CA in “fucking a sleeping chick” case. Sleepy slut doesn’t wanna admit to cheating.

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/03/california-rape-conviction-overturned-impersonation-sleeping-woman/1808221/

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 3:54 am NiteLily

      Assuming she really didn’t know the man was not her BF, and I’m having my doubts about that, the man did commit rape. There is no question about it. But only if he really tricked her.

      It was the wrong decision if she really didn’t know he wasn’t her BF. But how did he trick her? Did he use a mask when he entered her room and she didn’t know it wasn’t the BF? Hard to believe.

      LikeLike


  27. on January 4, 2013 at 12:14 am Jedi

    Dude the rape stuff’s a bit much. Men often orgasm when they get raped too. Doesn’t mean that they secretly want it.

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 12:53 am L.V.X.

      I can attest to that from long long ago. However being raped by an attractive girl isn’t as depressing as women being raped by men seems to be (as they describe it) portrayed. I didn’t go home and cry or feel ashamed – I was not taught that women could rape men, though I knew what happened immediately, during, and after. I just threw her jacket in the trash on my way out and left her there to find a ride from someone else while she slept.

      I was pissed, certainly, but only for an hour or so. I was most angry about the fact I didn’t know she wanted to fuck me in the first place. And that I was too drunk to recognize it until she’d gone out of her way to break into a friends house and take advantage of me. That I didn’t recognize all the signs that were so clear afterwards. I had to nervously laugh at the fact that I had been raped the prior evening by a girl I wanted to fuck (just not that moment she wanted to, clearly, have my dick inside of her). Fortunately I couldn’t finish, and it consisted of me waking up to her I guess molesting me (though can someone ones own age [at the time] molest someone?), stopping her, awakening again to her on me apparently with me inside of her a good hour later, and throwing her off of me, and falling asleep again. I didn’t feel sad or violated, more annoyed, just like a fucking dildo, like this is what women want me for? Something to wrap their vagines around? Whatever. At least the ones I want want that too was my rationalization, and true as I’d crushed on her for a LONG time without any clue she was into me til then. I best learn how to recognize when they do, so as to not end up being raped like I just was, is what I got out of it.

      I’m sure if she were some ugly terrifying girl sticking a bat up my asshole by gunpoint it’d be a different story, but essentially it was a girl I wanted jumping my bones despite my verbal No’s, and incapability of (until recognized, or acted upon) doing anything about it. Rape is serious, but it’s seriously different depending upon the circumstances, and the people involved (or accused).

      Had she or any other girl woke up to me fingering her, or me after being told no fucking her, I’d likely be in jail as a rapist. That’s a fact. But, because she was a she and I a he, I didn’t think anything of it beyond stupid drunk bitch I wanted to date is now extremely disgusting because she likely hops on lotsa cockszsas lotzsas as could be said.

      I know I will regret posting this. But Truth’s truth. I don’t see why certain things are ok to be White Knight about and other’s aren’t – rape, when real, doesn’t seem like a joke to me; however, it does seem like it’s not as real as we would expect due to what we’re taught. It’s just different. There’s rape like the indian and rape like omfg I can’t believe HE RAPED ME he’s so ugly! RaPEregret911! or omfg you’re breaking up with me you are a sick perverted rapist bastard molester I will have you ass-raped by donkey-cocks in mexico by my uncle who owns a D-show for your decision to no longer desire being with me! Sort of thing.

      Rape rape rape it’s like the word nigger, cept instead of white people it’s universally only women who can discuss it. No matter how one looks at it. Are molested girls raped? No they are molested. Are molested boys raped? No they are molested. Are raper’s Rapists if they are women? No they are abusive or personality disordered.

      LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 4:06 pm NiteLily

        You really need to be careful getting so drunk like that. What would you have done had you been dragged by two gay guys to some secluded area and they rapped you? I don’t recommend getting that drunk with anyone, losing your power, and depending on the kindness of strangers. People are evil. You were lucky it was with a girl you didn’t mid fucking anyway.

        Did you continue seeing her afterwards? I doubt it. She came off like such a Vampire. Who does something like this? If I were her, I would have taken care of you until morning, not molested you when you are half unconscious. It’s just disgusting and reeks slutty. I hope you learned your lesson.

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 5:03 pm Jumbobeef

        >If I were her, I would have taken care of you until morning, not molested you when you are half unconscious.

        Lolz from the mouth of a person who is a virgin and never tasted the sperm, i bet you are proud of yourself, DID YOU FIND A HUSBAND/Prince Charming YET?

        LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 6:08 am JumboBeef

      Lolz Really, DId you orgasm when you were raped? I can’t even understand what the hell are you saying and what is the point of making such a ridiculous comment, Maybe Gay men loves to be raped.

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 7:44 am The Balls

      The homohamster is strong in this one.

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 10:54 am Rick Derris

      The overrated William S Burroughs had something about that in “Naked Lunch.” That was when I stopped reading the book and tossed it. It was awful and I have no idea why even talented people like William Gibson like it so much.

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 3:08 pm Tyrone

      It likely means they changed their mind during the event.

      LikeLike


  28. on January 4, 2013 at 7:38 am me

    you could do other poll about girls in 1-10 scale, like you did in 2009.

    LikeLike


  29. on January 4, 2013 at 7:52 am Tertullian

    Nitelily and Neecy decide who gets to post the next useless, inflated comment:

    Starts at :06.

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 1:29 pm Greg Eliot

      If only the result of either were half as entertaining.

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 5:51 pm NiteLily

      Hahahaha ……thanks for the laughs. This has to be something form the 70s. Getting old, are we Tert? Please, put something more modern so that we youngin can relate to it better, but make sure the women are hotter. You might have more watchers besides ol’ pathetic Gregory.

      LikeLike


  30. on January 4, 2013 at 7:53 am Adam

    Most girls don’t do that grrrl power shit around me. There was, however, one crazy hot feminist chick who turned my beta friend from a fuck buddy into an orbiter (ugly fucking mess that was, dude broke down and I had to be his emotional tampon for a month) and tried to make me her new fuck buddy when I got the boys together and ostracized her from our social circle.

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 1:30 pm Greg Eliot

      Sounds like Brideshead Revisited… The Truly Gay Version.

      LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 3:33 pm Adam

        Nothing wrong with a little bromance, bro.

        LikeLike


      • on January 4, 2013 at 5:12 pm Greg Eliot

        Right you are, Broseidon… King of the Brocean.

        LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 5:18 pm Anon

        Most droll.

        LikeLike


      • on January 6, 2013 at 11:31 am Greg Eliot

        Most broll.

        LikeLike


  31. on January 4, 2013 at 8:47 am please someone answer my question!?

    I was at my aunt’s birthday party and there were 4 guys, one were married, the other had a girlfriend and the other two were single.

    I don’t know if they were mad or what, I’ve never seen that guys before, but the two who were single, begun to talk about me and ask things about me to my aunt lol. One of them said something like he would like to have a relationship with me wtf, I dont even know them, they talked about my looks I got a bit embarrased because I was getting too much attention from them.

    so, what number in the 1-10 scale a girl should be so that guys get so excited about her looks and don’t stop talking about her? I thought it was funny because I really dont find myself that attractive, I give myself a 7 at best but I could be underrating my looks?

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 2:01 pm JumboBeef

      >One of them said something like he would like to have a relationship with me wtf, I dont even know them, they talked about my looks I got a bit embarrased because I was getting too much attention from them.

      One of the thing about women is they get to the point pretty fast, they make it to the finish line without going through the starting line, First off is how can you be so sure that they were talking about you, if two men are singling out you than that could be a threesome for you, and if one of them is interested in you, well he would have told you about it instead of talking to your aunt, you know men (beta, omega or alpha) don’t suppress their intentions, the only difference between the categories of men is Alpha confuses the women about his intentions, beta goes crazy and tells her his every damn plan from diner to engagement to wedding and having kids, omega on the other end makes a complete fool of himself by giving different fucking signals. So either the boys were not talking about you or they were interested with you but due to the situation (Your aunts birthday) didn’t had the courage to talk to you about a socalled relationship (Let me guess hookup, dating?) so its either had been you imagining something cooking up between your aunt and them or they were all pansy gay guys.

      Well i can’t tell you what is your number on the scale without having a picture infront of me, either post one or stop calling yourself a 7 because many women misjudge themselves of being SUPER HOT, like those fat chicks who believe themselves to be super models, So post a picture doll and maybe i and other men can give you the accurate number of your beauty.

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 3:30 pm NiteLily

      Don’t get too excited. Men like to compare women. If you were the only young woman in the room at the time, it’s like you are the only woman that exists at any given moment. If this was at a club, they wouldn’t have paid much attention to you. Too many women there for you to be noticed, and too many women for men to go gaga over just one. Not that I am saying you are unattractive. The same goes for prettier girls. To get noticed at a club women needs to peacock – look super hot, dress sexy, etc. Yet, at your aunt’s all you have to do is be present and look somewhat presentable – maybe a 6.

      LikeLike


    • on January 5, 2013 at 9:51 am Anon

      Those are a couple of betas who were too chickenshit to talk directly to you.
      Their rating of their attractiveness shouldn’t matter for shit.

      What about the guys that you’re really attracted to? Do they notice you? If not, then a 7 grade sounds about right. (If they do notice you, submit a bikini pic before you get the fuck out of this blog)

      If you’re still young, keep trying to miraculously snag a reasonably older alpha for a while. If that doesn’t work out, you’ll have to settle with one of them betas.

      LikeLike


  32. on January 4, 2013 at 9:50 am Erudite Knight

    ‘You don’t want to stay with women like these beyond a few hate smashes,’

    Damn, if I only knew that 2 years ago.

    LikeLike


  33. on January 4, 2013 at 11:27 am yaser

    Comedy break:

    LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2013 at 6:11 pm Matthew King (King A)

      Better:

      LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2013 at 6:12 pm Matthew King (King A)

      LikeLike


  34. on January 4, 2013 at 11:41 am OldPrussian

    There was an Interview on the German Spiegel website with a mid-twenties British “feminist” a couple of weeks ago. Apparently, the girl had written a book whining about women being (just) a commodity in the fully liberalised flesh market (as if men weren’t). As relief effort she advocated inter alia: 1) No more unpaid work for women in households and child caring etc. – we want money, 2) a return to the concept of romantical love, 3) lifting any social restrictions (labelled “fascist”) for immigrants and working class guys on access to western/upper class girls which she still thinks being prevalent. The gal knows what she wants, obviously. Cheers!

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 12:12 pm Anonymous

      That last part is one of the most ugly aspects of western feminism: the part where girls are told to have sex with anyone but white upper middle class males.

      Can anyone give more details about this Steubenville rape scandal? Apparently a football player declared he would ruin a girl for dumping him and he orchestrated a gang rape that was later mostly covered up. Evidence shows this girl was innocent and another girl led her into a trap with a date rape drug, etc. The girl hadn’t been at a party getting drunk. She was drugged and taken unconscious to various parties.

      The anti-feminist community can use this case to show where they draw the line.

      The evidence is, interestingly, on a russian server because YouTube won’t let such things as a video of a drunken girl getting raped exist, even though it could spur justice at least in this case.

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 3:26 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Got a link?

      LikeLike


  35. on January 4, 2013 at 12:09 pm AlephMale

    I see the enraged Omega males who wish it was the 1950’s are out in force today. An Alpha goes with the current and works with what he’s been given.

    LikeLike


    • on January 6, 2013 at 3:19 pm Matthew King (King A)

      An Alpha goes with the current…

      No.

      LikeLike


  36. on January 4, 2013 at 12:37 pm the fauvist

    Haha, perfect way of putting the various gradations of feminist.

    LikeLike


  37. on January 4, 2013 at 12:48 pm Revo Luzione

    Just wanted to give a shout-out for the expression in the title and article itself: “banged out.”

    As in: “We went to her house and banged it out for a few hours, then I hit the gym.”

    “She totally wants to bang it out.”

    It is a classic men’s expression for sex that is underused. Bang on, gentlemen.

    LikeLike


    • on January 6, 2013 at 1:01 pm thwack

      Revo Luzione
      Just wanted to give a shout-out for the expression in the title and article itself: “banged out.”
      ———————————————————-

      I went to a party with a hot white girl one time, and a white guy I did not know asked me if I was “stabbing it?”.

      LOL

      LikeLike


      • on January 6, 2013 at 1:11 pm Greg Eliot

        I once asked a guy named Vlad if he was “impaling it”.

        LikeLike


  38. on January 4, 2013 at 1:09 pm taterearl

    From the minister of propaganda. Notice which gender is put where.

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 1:40 pm Greg Eliot

      Has a sense of gratitude… LLOZOZOZOZOZLLZLZLOOOL

      Chubby huckster.

      LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 6:31 pm yaser

      “shares information”, “embraces change”…. yeah…

      LikeLike


  39. on January 4, 2013 at 1:43 pm Ollie

    More fembot head exploding truth, hot off the press:

    From:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2257125/Nice-legs-darling-Wolf-whistles-named-weight-loss-motivator-72-cent-say-began-2013-unhappy-figure.html

    “Nice legs, darling! Wolf whistles named top weight-loss motivator as 72% of us say we began 2013 unhappy with our figure

    -80 per cent of dieters say compliments are best thing to keep them on track
    -Worst ‘compl-insults’ named as ‘you’re looking well’ and ‘curvy'”

    Heh, curvy.

    “Around 85 per cent of dieters will be motivated by a simple and sincere compliment, with 66 per cent enjoying someone asking ‘have you lost weight?’, and 53 per cent believing that someone saying ‘you look great’ helps keep things on track.

    Moreover, a good old-fashioned wolf-whistle will encourage 28 per cent of us to stick to our weight-loss plans, with 54 per cent of people polled saying they love receiving one.”

    Truth tastes a lot like Lindy West’s crisco-laden tears.

    LikeLike


    • on January 4, 2013 at 5:00 pm itsme

      heh, i use ‘you look well’ a lot on girls.

      the response is ‘thank you’. then a couple of seconds later they get this ‘wait, what?’ look on their face.

      thank god for girls. they’re so much more fun to fuck with than the voltron toys i had as a kid.

      LikeLike


      • on January 5, 2013 at 2:15 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Hah yeah, “you look… healthy” also works quite well.

        LikeLike


  40. on January 4, 2013 at 4:05 pm universe

    Lots of feminists…
    Now go.
    Don’t wannem don’t need em.

    LikeLike


  41. on January 4, 2013 at 4:46 pm Feministiska kvinnor tänder på män som skiter i feminism « Yasers hörna

    […] [She was definitely my favorite feminist.] <- den här tänker jag inte citera. omg, lol. […]

    LikeLike


  42. on January 4, 2013 at 5:05 pm Marky Mark

    I’ve noticed my game (aloof alpha) tends to work BETTER on the high flying super independent career chick with a superiority complex. I’m not getting many down to earth girl next door types. Then again, it is fun to knock them off their pedestal!

    LikeLike


  43. on January 4, 2013 at 7:52 pm Andy

    the troof about wage discrepancies peddled by feminists:
    http://theroadtohell.net/?p=54

    LikeLike


  44. on January 5, 2013 at 7:35 am nugganu

    I still want to see the ultimate showdown: radical feminism vs. radical islam.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2013 at 6:17 am yaser

      huh?

      How do you mean?

      LikeLike


  45. on January 5, 2013 at 4:51 pm Anonymous

    http://feministbecause.tumblr.com/post/14155785267

    LikeLike


  46. on January 6, 2013 at 5:17 am Oriflame

    When Feminists claim that girls have every right to roam around in night wearing short skirts and men do not have right to rape them…where does the question for right comes? I mean it is not right, it just happens.
    Similarly, ‘My Body My Right’..it is your body and your right..but even banks suggest that when you are carrying cash or gold you should take care of the same..if you have your body protect it from the ones who are taking it forcefully…last, police is not bodyguard.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2013 at 3:00 am Hugh G. Rection

      It’s about as effective as the right not to have your unlocked car stolen.

      LikeLike


  47. on January 28, 2013 at 3:18 pm Setting Up the Date: Texting Made Complicated ;) | The Libra Chronicles

    […] Lots Of Feminists Are Getting Banged Out By PUAs (heartiste.wordpress.com) […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    Jack Silva on Red Tsunami?
    Jack Silva on Red Tsunami?
    Jack Silva on Red Tsunami?
    Carlos Danger on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Jack Silva on Shitlib Logic Trap!
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: