Nestled warmly in the Chateau archives, a House Lord wrote that hotter women means better sex for men. A chart was included to drive home the point:
In the interest of science, I’ve put my beauty-to-cumload comparison in a handy chart:
hotness of woman size of load squirt distance
0 * *
1 * *
2 * *
3 pre-cum only needed squeezing out
4 droplet dribble
5 <5 grams 2 cm
6 fills bellybutton 3 inches
7 1 tbsp 8 inches
8 2 tbsps 1.5 feet
9 1/4 cup 3 feet
10 gallon** 5 yards***insufficient data
**extrapolation
Oh, did the feminists and their hairyrimlickers howl with pained indignation upon reading such a brutally honest account of the mechanics of male sexual desire! The satisfaction of beholding the raw, bleeding ids on display must have been, in a word, delicious.
Still, there were those who lived in cellar permahovels who could argue that, despite a mountainous accumulation of real world anecdotal evidence, science hadn’t (yet) come around to proving one way or the other that men experienced improved sexual pleasure from banging hotter women. Socially calibrated readers were forced to take their own personal experiences at face value.
Until now. In what is sure to slice clean the last dangly sinew of the reject brigade’s frayed ego, a recent scientific study has appeared which proves, AGAIN, another CH truth.
Slimmer Women’s Waist is Associated with Better Erectile Function in Men Independent of Age.
Previous research has indicated that men generally rate slimmer women as more sexually attractive, consistent with the increased morbidity risks associated with even mild abdominal adiposity. To assess the association of women’s waist size with a more tangible measure of perceived sexual attractiveness (as well as reward value for both sexes), we examined the association of women’s age and waist circumference with an index of men’s erectile function (IIEF-5 scores), frequency of penile-vaginal intercourse (PVI), and sexual satisfaction in a representative sample of Czechs (699 men and 715 women) aged 35-65 years. Multivariate analyses indicated that better erectile function scores were independently associated with younger age of self and partner and women’s slimmer waist. PVI frequency was independently associated with women’s younger age and women’s slimmer waist. Sexual satisfaction was independently associated with men’s younger age and slimmer waist for both sexes. Better erectile function, greater PVI frequency, and greater sexual satisfaction were associated with women’s slimmer waist, independently of both sexes’ ages. Possible reasons for the waist effects were discussed, including women’s abdominal body fat decreasing their own desire through neurohormonal mechanisms and decreasing their partner’s desire through evolutionarily-related decreased sexual attractiveness.
I think the abstract speaks for itself. However, for the benefit of the short bussers: The men in the study got harder, stronger, bigger boners with the physically better-looking women. The men also had more frequent sex when they were having it with younger, hotter, tighter women. And finally, the men reported more sexual satisfaction when their sexual partners were hotter, thinner women with sexy hourglass shapes.
Young, slender, hot babes are nature’s Viagra, capable of inflating even an old man’s wrinkled wurst to heights of former glory.
I mean, does it get any more devastating than this for the lying liars who freebase pretty lies? The boner doesn’t lie. The boner cannot be fooled. The boner will not suffer sophists gladly. The boner is the irrefutable, unavoidable, irreconcilable, incontestable, ecumenical truth that jabs insouciantly into the clouded eyes of the pitiable self-deceivers. It is the warrior’s pole that rises over the horizon holding aloft the banner of savage, steel-forged reality.
The sheer volume of scientific studies confirming or otherwise presenting substantial evidence for Chateau Heartiste tenets and assertions about female sexual nature, game, and the functioning of the modern dating market is what could be called an “embarrassment of riches”. But I carry my burden with stoic resolve, to preen another day.
The boner only knows three answers to life’s questions.
Yes
Yes if drunk
No
LikeLike
lzozozoz
da best cure for ED is YP!!!!
da bets cure for Ereictile Disfufcnction is young pususysysysusus
LikeLike
SO TRUE! Viagra was invented so guys could fuck women over 35…
LikeLike
even though dante did a pretty good job at hell, i have a better definition:
finding yourself sitting next to a 40 year old multi-pre- buttcoked desouled women who instsists on wathcing football with you and any time a viagra commerical comes on she tells yu to man up and buy some as jsuesth said that a man must gt it up for his harragsgd multi-buttfocked wivefefez lzlzllzoozloolzlzlzzlzozlozozozozozoozozoz
LikeLike
Cause of ED
1. Decrease of T due to massive intake of estrogenic foods such as grains and bread
(FDA food pyramid is purposely misleading the masses because as Senator Jack Kemp once said, “The FDA is the best federal agency money can buy” — owned by Big Agra and Big Pharma)
2. “Impotence” has existed forever. Was talked about hundreds of years ago. The Medieval Church would not annul a marriage on grounds of impotence until the allegedly impotent man was surrounded by 7 nubile women. A Catholic priest would observe whether or not he got an erection at this stage – (if no, he would be officially impotent in the eyes of God)
Then, 1999 A.D., Pfizer reinvents “Impotence” as “Erectile Dysfunction.”
3. TESTOSTERONE operates on a FEEDBACK LOOP. Assuming you are not killing your masculine hormones by eating like a woman (See #1), if you are sufficiently Alpha, your PLACE IN THE HIERARCHY OF MEN affects your levels of T, scientifically documented
http://www.amazon.com/Social-Structure-Testosterone-Explorations-Socio-Bio-Social/dp/0813515513
LikeLike
Fascinating about the medieval impotence standard. Any source or place we could look into that more?
LikeLike
There is a horrible cheesy series on Showtime or some other pay-cable channel (re: Tits after 10pm TV!) called The Borgias (don’t know if still on now). Stars Jeremy Irons and a bunch of others as the corrupt Borgia clan of Italy, who held the papacy and various other powerful positions in Italy in during a period in the Renaissance
As I said, it’s horrible. Basically, it’s female psychodrama to the max. Although it recounts true events, (the Borgias were notoriously corrupt, hypocritical, fucked-up, and basically evil), it uses these as a excuse to attack Western Civ and promote fag/broad psychodrama, lack of morality, left-wing politics, and idiocy. Like most pay-cable “deep” TV series (think Mad Men, Boardwalk Empire, Sopranos, Sex and the City, etc).
Anyway, one episode I caught had the Borgia pope using this method to severely embarrass a rival. After forcing his daughter to marry the rival as a presumed truce), a few months later the Borgia pope has her demand an annulment based on impotence. Of course it’s not true—they rival was fucking the daughter even before the marriage began, and after the wedding too.
However, the rival has one choice to prove he isn’t impotent: fuck two hookers (as the wife cannot be embarrassed like that!) in front of a room full of cardinals, Borgia loyalists, and the pope himself—and in the Vatican no less. For those autistic ones reading, let me explain that having sex in front of an audience is guaranteed to make 90% of men shrivel up. Before Viagra, male porn stars’ greatest trait was keeping a hard on with the cameras rolling.
SO the rival, desperate not to embarrassed and lose his wife (and her dowry), gets really close to trying it, but the titters of the pope and his crew ultimately force him to declare himself impotent (he won’t expose himself to prove it). Marriage annulled, rival severely embarrassed, and daughter now free to go back to fucking her brother (I told you, messed up series).
LikeLike
That would be “Fascinate,” by Hogshead, .. p 148
http://www.amazon.com/Fascinate-Your-Triggers-Persuasion-Captivation/dp/0061714704
LikeLike
“(the Borgias were notoriously corrupt, hypocritical, fucked-up, and basically evil), it uses these as a excuse to attack Western Civ and promote fag/broad psychodrama, lack of morality, left-wing politics, and idiocy.”
Horrible, horrible, horrible. The whole purpose of this series is to justify the notion that because some popes were corrupt, then all religion is evil, especially Christianity. It’s totally an anti-Christian vehicle, and by extension anti-good-old-fashion values and ethics.
LikeLike
“‘Impotence’ has existed forever. Was talked about hundreds of years ago. The Medieval Church would not annul a marriage on grounds of impotence until the allegedly impotent man was surrounded by 7 nubile women. A Catholic priest would observe whether or not he got an erection at this stage – (if no, he would be officially impotent in the eyes of God)”
LOL! Nice!
LikeLike
For some reason. 😐
LikeLike
I can’t do “yes if drunk” anymore. I always sober up half way in and go limp. Cramming it in their butt doesn’t even help. It’s quality goods now or nothing for me.
LikeLike
Men can still assess attractiveness while drunk, but the give-a-shitter can change. Meanwhile, women are deceived by drink.
“The men and women given the vodka and tonic found it more difficult to work out if a face was symmetrical than those on soft drinks.
Researcher Lewis Halsey said: ‘People that had drink tended to be less good at noticing if a face was asymmetrical, they often saw it as being symmetrical when it was asymmetrical.’
And the women drinkers were particularly bad at the task, the journal Addiction reports.”
LikeLike
lozozozozozol
da otehr day i was on a planez and i was trying to order some peeenutzzz peaaanutttez and teh stewwardesss i was ytrtying to get her number to play texty texty before sexty sexty gamesz lzozozozl but she couldn’t undertsand!!!!!
so i was getting frustrated and then thankfuly an old lady ineteeveened and said:
“Pardon me, but i speak GBFM.”
And she aks me, “dost youz want to butthext lzozlzlz he stsueardess stewardess zlzozllz?”
And I sayas, “No m;’azzmmzm I justs wannna ginasex her as da gbfdm don’t buttehxt nor tape it secerereteletuy like da neoetehstnat heoric teapers of buttehxt in sectreet lzozozozolzlzlz.”
And the old lady said, “ahaha i take it you’re not a sneoeoneoth sectriev taperz of buttehxt? all the betterz just don’t let her know as her butt ststinglozozozl won’t be set off i will get her numebersz so you gacan gina sex herz zlozozoz.”
And I says, “yah thanakz alothz and i want some PEEE NUTZ totot and then after that i wanna wants to put my own peanutz in her ginahole to sevree her gianat tingalzozozlozozz zzlzlzlzlzozozlzozozlzzo.”
So da nice old ladyzz turns 2 da stewardness nd says, “he would like some peanuts and your number.”
And that’s how I got the stewardneessed # as she undeetertsosozoodz!!!
the world is a beuatifufl boootyfulll place!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am serious. And don’t call me Shirley.
LikeLike
Who was the guy that played the fag? he was so funny.!
LikeLike
Stephen Stucker. He died from AIDS a few years after the release of “Airplane 2 with William Shatner”
LikeLike
distance and duration
LikeLike
So where would masturbation fit in all this?
LikeLike
It’s already been studied: Masturbation leads to less ejaculation. For obvious reasons, the body holds back when it knows that you’re doing something that won’t lead to pregnancy. I’d find the study, but looking for it for only a few seconds was enough. You can find it yourself.
LikeLike
Interesting. They have large enough of a sample that we could slice and dice the data in numerous ways. I’d be interested to know how important absolute waist size was vs. waist-to-hip ratio, and how that interacts with BMI.
The important caveat to note that whatever they found is only generalizable to Czech men. Though it is likely similar for other groups, mileage probably varies as you go around the world.
[Heartiste: Barring a few odd indigenous outliers, I doubt the mileage varies that much. There was a seminal study back in the 90s, can’t locate it atm, which showed that even backwater tribesmen in deepest Africa and New Guinea preferred silhouettes of women with the ideal 0.7 waist-to-hip ratio, and BMIs in the healthy 17-22 range. It would appear that the sexual preferences of Western men are not all that different from that of other groups of men.]
LikeLike
A key problem is that every group is only representative of that group (“different peoples is different”, as HBD Chick would say). While I’d concede that there are certain human universals in regards to female sexual attractiveness, there is plenty of anecdotal evidence that suggests some variation exists between groups. One such example, of course, is the “ghetto booty” – see Buffy the Body or Brazil’s own Andressa Soares.
[Heartiste: HBDers can get a little carried away with group difference theory. While I believe that there are some notable group differences in the arena of male sex preference — black guys prefer more rump, asian guys more neoteny — there are also important universals. For instance, there is hardly a large population group of men anywhere in the world who prefer fucking obese pigs over slender babes. Other human preferences and characteristics — such as female hypergamy and laughter — are also universal in nature.]
Both of those women have narrow waists, but waists that are likely wider than those in the low end of the Czech sample. They have very low waist-to-hip ratios, however (due to well, ample hips). I’d be curious to see how that interacts in this sample, and in samples of other populations.
[The kinds of differences in sexual preference you would likely see between ethnic and racial populations of men will be in effect only at the margins. A Czech may like his ladies at 0.65 WHR, while a Papuan might like women with 0.75 WHRs. But in the big picture these are minor differences dwarfed by the narrow ranges which define the universals.
Now while this general rule about universals holds for sexual preference, it’s less applicable when we move into other categories of human preference and behavior, such as smarts, conscientiousness and musical taste. And this makes sense — the sexual economy and the sex drive are the foundational fulcrums of human existence. Every other market and behavior is a layer atop that foundation, and so we would expect the details of the upper, thinner, more exposed layers to vary more by race and ethnicity, where natural selection can exert more profound adaptational influence.]
LikeLike
As I say, the devil is in the details. Though in this instance, what you say is overall correct, it’s still important to be mindful when generalizing between human groups, even when it comes to sex and physical attractiveness.
LikeLike
JayMan, you are completely wrong about the “ghetto booty”.
If you look at a lot of hip-hop models and “ghetto booty” models – you will see that they still have impossibly small waists. So they still fit in the ideal of “small waists”. The small waist is relative. A 5′ curvy model with a .7 hip to waist will be more likely to have a smaller waist measurement than a 6′ curvy model with a .7 waist to hip ratio.
I predict that if the researchers looked at waist to hip they would have discovered an even stronger connection with boner strength than simply waist circumference. And controlling for hip to waist ratio, a stronger preference for slimmer waist.
LikeLike
“JayMan, you are completely wrong about the “ghetto booty”.
If you look at a lot of hip-hop models and “ghetto booty” models – you will see that they still have impossibly small waists. So they still fit in the ideal of “small waists”.”
Note, I didn’t say that small waists were unimportant, nor did I dismiss the importance of WHR. Quite the opposite, I think a low WHR is of paramount importance in female attractiveness across virtually all groups.
The variable involved in the “ghetto booty” may involve hip width and overall BMI. The desired WHR is probably roughly the same, if not perhaps slightly lower.
LikeLike
Americans and others at a socioeconomic level that they’ve never had survival worries in the way that would affect partner selection, often think of these things in extremes. Someone who does need an all around good partner has bigger worries that whether or not they’re physically ideal or close, and can accept tradeoffs, especially when faced with a truly unique individual and opportunity.
The point I think some of us are trying to make is that this is a tradeoff. Settling may not be a bad thing, but it is settling, and it is important to view it as such in order to avoid convenient illusions that our social engineers exploit. For those of us of the more charismatic sort, it is also crucial that if there is to be a snowball’s chance in hell of recovering from the current maladaptive programming, we not be a party to the illusions.
Women should be thinking about what they are bringing to the table. They should be thinking about that in terms of what really matters to men, and what matters to the kind of men they want to end up with. Our beauty, how ever much or little we may have, is one of those things, and is worth preserving and nurturing, and I’ll be honest, capitalizing on while we have it.
Most American women might read this study as some reason to hate themselves because their value to men is mostly directly sexual. Other women would read this to mean they should lotion their hands after milking the goats, or not cut their hair off just because their friends did it.
LikeLike
@Nicole:
I don’t disagree with anything you’re saying.
What you’re describing is similar to what Peter Frost talks about comparing Northern Europe with tropical Africa.
In short, how strong sexual selection will be all depends on how tight the competition for mates are. The more choice one sex has, the more that sex will be able to impose its mate choice criteria strictly. The other sex will have to “settle” much more often.
LikeLike
doug
If you look at a lot of hip-hop models and “ghetto booty” models – you will see that they still have impossibly small waists.
—————————————————————-
Which makes that ass look all the more bigger.
LikeLike
I believe that what confuses people is the difference between penile and social rewards. For women, it doesn’t matter if you think we’re shaggable if you wouldn’t be seen with or marry us. Since ugly women and harpies get plenty social reward for existing while some hot and/or feminine and “ride or die” women get crapped on, we’re rightfully confused about what men want from us.
LikeLike
Nicole
we’re rightfully confused about what men want from us.
———————————————————————-
OK, let me help clear your confusion: What we want from you is the recognition that your pussy does NOT qualify you to be equal to everything a man has to be in order for you to date him.
Luck, is not ability.
If we bring you into the “company” as a clerk on the 4th floor; do NOT get an attitude because we did not bring you in as vice president.
Either start working your way up, or quit.
But don’t stay there on the 4th floor trying to make me miserable because you don’t want to work your way up in the company.
I could have started you off in the mail room with the rest of the bitches?
LikeLike
LOL! You know this kind of talk is music to the ears of the men here. It strongly appeals to their psyche. I’m sure you’re getting the thumbs up for such rhetoric.
LikeLike
Listen kitebily, you can minimize it all you want, but thats really how it works.
women need to be reminded that they are NOT special.
Every guy should at some point ask his girl:
What do you have that I cannot replace tomorrow?
What is she gonna say?
LikeLike
Sure, if it’s a regular relationship of just getting laid, indeed he can replace her in an instant. That’s why women shouldn’t get involved in casual sex type relationship, so that actual feelings of love get a chance of developing.
Anyway, I sense a new thwack starting to emerge. A new persona for 2013? I like it; you sound real sassy lately.
LikeLike
Whorelily there is no such thing as Love, if there is it only resides in Disney fairy tales, The rest is just people using each other, Looking at women nowadays you can and i can see who is taking advantage of whom? I am not in the group who wants to be used but if women can sham men in the name of love and take everything that he ever owned by divorce than i guess i have the right to shag her for a few months and throw her as a disposable flashlight
LikeLike
Nicole
For women, it doesn’t matter if you think we’re shaggable if you wouldn’t be seen with or marry us… we’re rightfully confused about what men want from us.
The number of men you might actually want who are interested in lifelong monogamous relationships are shrinking and will go the way of the dodo within a generation (if there are any left). The solution is simple: women (especially attractive ones) need to stop having not just casual sex but a string of short-medium term relationships as well and demand a proper relationship (preferably marriage). Because right now liberalism has turned western society into the selfish narcissistic man’s paradise. We can fuck a wide variety of women while spending our money on frivolities like good food, booze, video games, etc. while the women go out and earn their own living. The problem is in your hands (or, rather, your vaginas) to fix.
LikeLike
“The solution is simple: women (especially attractive ones) need to stop having not just casual sex but a string of short-medium term relationships as well and demand a proper relationship (preferably marriage). Because right now liberalism has turned western society into the selfish narcissistic man’s paradise. We can fuck a wide variety of women while spending our money on frivolities like good food, booze, video games, etc. while the women go out and earn their own living.”
I can’t agree with you more; the power to change the status quo is in the hands of women. Most women don’t know what’s a proper relationship – they have been either brainwashed by feminists who lead them astray as to what men want, or tell them that women should be equal to men sexually, or they respond to cads, louts, and men in general putting pressure on them to have sex immediately or risk losing them to disinterest as the implication is, other women have sex and if you don’t there are other fish in the sea.
And men spending money on other things instead of on a wife and family while women work and earn their own living, is the most poignant point here. This setup is totally against women’s interest. Feminism, homosexuality, and women earning their own money is the trifecta as to why women have sex without securing a proper relationship first.
Unfortunately most women don’t have a clue as to why they can’t find a serious love connection leading to married. Very sad state of affairs.
LikeLike
Hottentot Venus
LikeLike
I cant find it because I don’t know the word to describe it; but, back in the Henry the 8th days women used to carry “scaffolding” under their dresses to make their asses look bigger.
What is that thing called?
LikeLike
Crinoline 4 Crackas
LikeLike
A bustle.
LikeLike
A Bustle, Really that is sexy, 😀
LikeLike
Steatopygous prosthetic
LikeLike
Laughing my ass on 🙂
LikeLike
I hear a rustle in your bustle.
LikeLike
Very good, you two craZy kids.
I was looking for a way to work in steatopygia myself.
LikeLike
Is that the ding of your dong?
LikeLike
Now, now… no need to paint the peacock.
LikeLike
Butt out.
LikeLike
Fine gratitude, after my backsided compliment.
LikeLike
Our stichomythia on steatopygia is this close to bringing Kate to a first-class vocabugasm.
LikeLike
GIft me motherfucka!
LikeLike
She’s happy now… we were getting behind in our replies.
LikeLike
Hang in there, we’ll get to the bottom of this.
LikeLike
You’ll work it out together, cheek by jowl.
LikeLike
here are the studies:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7965211/Women-with-hourglass-figures-and-perfect-waists-most-attractive-study-finds.html
A related one, this is even more interesting. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19688590
Basically, men prefer 0.7 WHR over 0.9 WHR (obvi), but also prefer 0.7 WHR with small boobs over 0.9 WHR with big boobs. Anecdotally, this seems to accord with most men I know. I wonder whether apart from the here and now of “I want to fuck her” is the consideration that for a long-term mate, smaller boobs will last a lot longer, whereas a woman who is already 0.9 WHR and big boobs will have pendulous breasts in no time, to go along with her pendulous fat folds.
LikeLike
Very true. After the initial thought of “bazongas!”, the vision of knees being used instead of ping pong paddles sets in. My wife has 44″ hips, a 30″ waist and a B cup size chest. Good gravy I am crazy about her.
LikeLike
ahh, lost my comment. Here are the studies:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/7965211/Women-with-hourglass-figures-and-perfect-waists-most-attractive-study-finds.html
and here’s a more interesting one:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19688590
basically, skinny > fat with big boobs.
LikeLike
Even men whom are blind from birth, whom have never seen a waist, prefer a 0.7 WHR. The study, posted here sometime in the last year or so, used mannequins of various WHR proportions. The sightless participants of the study felt the mannequins’ proportions & reported which they liked more and felt more sexual attraction to.
LikeLike
Revo Luzione
Even men whom are blind from birth, whom have never seen a waist, prefer a 0.7 WHR.
———————————————————-
Not only that,
Blind white people know they are white AND can tell who is nonwhite; even though they have never seen a person, a color, or anything in their entire life.
Think about that.
LikeLike
You know the old joke, right?
Q: Why do [insert bêtes noires here] smell bad?
A: So blind people can hate them too.
LikeLike
(((shaking head)))
Last time I heard that one Col. Sanders was a private.
Do you know why black people don’t hate white people?
Because the sun already does that for us.
Zing!
LikeLike
It would be clever if the initial precept weren’t false… let alone the punchline.
LikeLike
Greg, you are so well spoken;and besides, some of my best friends are white.
LikeLike
And you, my friend, are a credit to your race. 😀
LikeLike
Blind people know they rae white…but do white people know they are BLIND??(think about it…)
LikeLike
“The men in the study got harder, stronger, bigger boners with the physically better-looking women. ”
They had to do a study for this?
[Heartiste: Some people need to be hit over the head. Even then…]
LikeLike
How do I get in on the racket of proving something obvious to anyone with half brain and getting paid for it?
In my next grant proposal: “Proving that younger women are hotter than older women”. Who wants to fund this ground breaking endeavor with say 20 million dollars?
LikeLike
Easy.
Approach some femtard foundation but claim to be looking for evidence of exactly the opposite…
LikeLike
Most studies end up confirming the obvious. Yet, people can’t accept the obvious without a study proving it. That’s the lefty mentality.
LikeLike
Remember, women are mostly social thinkers, and socially it is not obvious. This study proved something obvious…ly physical and psychological that has very little to do with real life as people live it, especially in complex societies. Even in relatively low context societies, a person having truly superior suitability would compensate for whatever rewards were lacking from their appearance. So feminists figure they’re going to try to make the personality factor how much money a woman makes and basically how masculine she can be.
I’d like to see a study that proved a man would lose a boner from being berated and abused, no matter how hot a woman is. That would be a real killing blow.
LikeLike
“I’d like to see a study that proved a man would lose a boner from being berated and abused, no matter how hot a woman is. That would be a real killing blow.”
LOL! A study like that would never be commissioned by anyone, unless it was some conservative group and then they would be called fanatic Christians with no credibility. Most studies are very selective to prove the lefty agenda, but when these studies prove old-fashioned common sense, they end up in trouble and try to compensate by sugar coating.
LikeLike
You’re a moron who thinks life can be defined on a two-variable axis. Please try to act like you went to school for 5 or 10 minutes and learn that there are more variables in human variance than one, so as not to tax the patience of those who are superior to you on the axis of general intelligence.
LikeLike
Really?? Dummy! It’s called common sense. Maybe you haven’t heard of that yet, which explains your gibbering. As far as your mental intelligence, I put you at a 2. It’s funny since you call yourself, “I know exactly” What exactly do you know? That you’re an idiot. I wonder if your looks are a bit higher than 2 though?
LikeLike
8=============D
LikeLike
Or that pro wrestling is fixed or that God is not real.
LikeLike
A study is needed for this for the same reason fast food chains have to put warnings on coffee cups now. Feminists have been trying for some time to make socioeconomic class the new pretty, and need to be occasionally reminded that no amount of money is going to make ugly pretty unless it is given to a very good plastic surgeon.
I do fear though, that the timing is due to their gearing up for tax subsidized weight loss surgery. “Nobody will love you if you’re fat,” is a good way to get women demanding it.
Be careful what you wish for guys.
LikeLike
By the way, _Repo the Genetic Opera_ is free to watch on YouTube. Last time the doctor asked me if I’d consider WLS to speed things up, I replied, “I would rather be blind.”
LikeLike
For those who are interested and without access, here is the entire ungated journal article.
LikeLike
Just the red pill I needed to motivate me to lose the ~5lbs I piled on during the Holidays. Thanks Heartiste!
[Heartiste: My inimitable pleasure!]
LikeLike
Thank God! we have women who still use brain like yourself instead of their fewwwlings getting butt hurt by hearing they are “Land Whales”
LikeLike
Hotness = 0 means retrograde.
Your penis shrinks into your body to hide, you’re balls rise up into your abdomen, and any sperm you had inside you commit suicide for fear of accidentally following their instincts if left near the vicinity of it berth.
Squirt distance gets a negative score.
In lieu of the fact that i just dealt with a troll a few moments ago, i’d be reticent to bring up the fact that ugly feminists for years have been howling that it’s all about the inner beauty that counts, the mind, the personality, the sustance.. and that this chart is just wrong.
These same vile creatures of the deep are also the ones that created NiceGuys of OKCupid.
Funny how that works huh.
LikeLike
one of my readers asked me my trick to increasing “nut volume”.
1. workout- it produces testosterone
2. cut back on alcohol
3. DO NOT SMOKE- it constricts blood vessels.
4. eat pineapples and bananas- rich in potassium
5. take a multi vitamin and take extra zinc.
sit back and let your inner peter north fly.
LikeLike
Also almonds, broccoli and/or cauliflower, and red meat.
I was eating that stuff to begin with along with bananas and working out.
LikeLike
taterearl hits the nail on the head.
Especially make sure you are tucking into nuts. While most are likely eating red meat and scoffing cruciferous veg, few are eating nuts. Spend a few minutes googling health properties. You will be astounded. They are, without a doubt, nature’s aphrodisiac. Stock up on your brazil’s, almonds, walnuts, coconuts and pumpkin seeds lads.
http://www.121doc.co.uk/news/pistachio-beneficial-for-male-sexual-health-7644.html – A small study claims that eating pistachio nuts for three weeks may alleviate impotence.
LikeLike
Saw this on Krauser. great vid! “Dear woamn”! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_uRIMUBnvw
LikeLike
Dat Hamster:
LikeLike
“[I] wasn’t really that desperate to be a mum. I thought it might be just something to do. Get a year off maternity leave. I might get the man to hang around… Women have lots of reasons for having babies. Some of them maybe vanity… they feel they maybe missing their chance… it gives them something to love.”
She’s fallen off the wheel, taken a bump to the head and we are now hearing the truth from the horses mouth.
LikeLike
you have already posted this.
[Heartiste: *I* didn’t already post this.]
LikeLike
I thought Chateau Heartiste has been handed off to a “Group of Writers” some time ago. 🙂
Kind of like Saturday Night Live
LikeLike
“hotter women means better sex for men”
A friend of mine who has been married for quite a while was talking about “needing something” to increase the amount of sex he has. I recommended a younger woman as the best solution to that problem. It doesn’t matter how hot your wife used to be, add in the boredom of banging the same woman year-after-year, and her getting older and fatter, and is it any wonder married men have problems getting it up. It’s interesting that bachelors who are still having sex with sweet-young-things are never in need of anything other than a new woman…
LikeLike
@Offtopic
can you elaborate on popularity of John Gray and his book “Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus”. It was the one and only book I have ever throw away after my “soul mate” left me. At the first time when I read the book the relationships rules were so clear and understandable that I thought that I found the holy grail of establish a steady, fulfilling relationship. But guess what? The beta mindset presented by the book provided irreversible damage which result in a break up.
I know that the world is basically found on paradoxes, by why this book is so popular? Are the people so blind and delusion that they don’t see the truth? What happened, that the world went so wrong and men do not follow anymore what their guts are telling them?
@another offtopic
I found that there is some easy way to give the rookies an idea for how to behave around the girls they like to fuck. Basically, if you are rookie, than date the girls that are little below your standard. Feel free to do whatever you want. Observe, learn, memorize “you are the prize” mindset.
After that, approach the girls you like. Implement the same behavior as with the girls below your league. Enjoy and be happy.
LikeLike
Well, according to R.Don Steele, who savaged him in his book “How to Date Young Women for Men Over 35”, Gray was a virgin until the age of 40 and had no business offering relationship advice. Most female “sex writers” also happen to be sweat-hogs. There oughta be a law…
LikeLike
There is at least one potential confound in this study, and “game” wisdom should explain it: It’s not just the women who are different, but perhaps the men are as well. Women of different levels of attractiveness partner with different quality men, and we’d expect the most attractive women would be coupled with the most masculine men (the alphas). These men presumably have higher levels of androgens, which would lead to more vigorous sexual performance.
[Heartiste: Someone who has time to trawl the full study can confirm if the authors measured men’s responses to different women, or if they just looked at differences between men with hotter or uglier partners. Otherwise, yeah, men with hotter women will probably have higher T, or more sensitive androgen receptors. But that’s not a given. Perhaps, a study will come out eventually that records individual men over the course of their sexual careers to see how differently they respond to women of varying attractiveness.]
LikeLike
Indeed women will have the same effect with men – handsome Alphas make her horny while dorky losers send her frigid. It is already known the sexual response is innate – men and women have made their decision about someone in a split second. Hence it’s a genetic, primal reflex and not a logical conscious decision.
LikeLike
I think most men and women can assess if they are attracted to someone within 30 seconds.
LikeLike
LikeLike
I also find myself standing up straighter around hotter women. My last name just happens to be the German word for spear.
LikeLike
LikeLike
I blame part of the hate directed at marriage on the widespread failure to marry a woman significantly younger, say, 10 years.
Have you noticed how in most marriages the woman is the same age as the man, or just a couple of years younger? Ever wondered why that is?
The ancient Greek philosophers, who were probably the wisest men in all of recorded history, instead recommended the man be 15 years older than his wife.
Part of it may be laid at the feet of equalism. Equalist tards are more likely to marry women their own age. Problem is, men stay attractive for considerably longer than women do. While women are hot sexy 18 and 19 yos, their male counterparts are still in many cases trying to figure out how to stop jizzing their pants when talking to a girl (figuratively speaking, thankfully, in most cases). Men have to learn, and unless they’re naturals or popular, don’t get it right for many years, if ever. Consequently, many men don’t hit their prime until their early 30s.
Besides the equalist BS, we can also blame the impatience and low self-esteem of early 30s men for settling for bloating cows with a kid or two from a previous marriage. Women who are rapidly heading towards the wall, who in an ideal world should be happy if they land a 40 y.o. man — and given the growth of the numbers of singles, this isn’t all that difficult anymore — instead are aggressively courting the otherwise prime men who don’t have the confidence to talk to younger women.
This, in turn, keeps betas betas.
LikeLike
The plan should be: have your fun with women your own age until you reach 30 (or so) then marry a woman 10 years younger that way you should have healthy children instead of waiting too long with an older woman and have a strong chance of getting retarded kids.
LikeLike
Naionally, the average age difference in a married couple is about 4 years.
LikeLike
*Nationally*
LikeLike
No I think you were right the first time,its Naionally.
LikeLike
I’ve set my new parameters at 40-50. I’m meeting several mid-forties guys who have had their adventures elsewhere returning to my area glad to meet someone like me. For regular guys still in their thirties, I’ve got minimal appeal. I know why, but they don’t seem to understand.
LikeLike
I thought you already found one chump? DIdn’t you said you are One Man’s Geisha and it was his way that you removed Geisha from kate? Still i am confused do you and nitelily have men in your life or are you looking in the “Eternal sunshine of spotless mind”.
LikeLike
Finding people does not equate to them wanting to have relationships.
LikeLike
So it was just a formal free dinner that you wanted for the men to pay and shower you with gifts, now what is that called? Narcissism, having princesses mentality, remind me why you are in dating sites if you don’t want people to have a relationship with you?
LikeLike
THEY didn’t want to have relationships with ME! Duh?
LikeLike
Ohhhhh, so they had casual sex in mind :D. Sorry but i think it is becoming the norm. either put up or ….
LikeLike
They’re feminists because they refute science and common sense at every turn brah. The predictable response is that this result is only because men are conditioned by the media only to find this body type attractive and that if media portrayed a more representative sample of bodytypes this wouldn’t happen. Funnily enough, these would be the same people who would deny that gays can be “turned straight” (not saying they can be). So we can condition sexuality only when it serves the feminist interest? You just can’t win. Not with science and not with glaringly obvious universal empirical observation.
LikeLike
Good call. Being feminist is synonymous with embracing illogical statements and made up horseshit. The boner is not influenced by media opinions.
LikeLike
My favorite question to the folks claiming that society/the media/ Chateau conditioned men to favor a body type includes the standard “What are the upstream variables?” and variations thereof.
“Society conditions men and/or women to X/Y…”
“Oh, and what made society to condition men/women this way?”
….
follow causal chain to biology
…
fuses blow.
LikeLike
Science, evidence, facts = Misogyny
LikeLike
Not Really you forget to add Men in there.
Science, Evidence, Logic, Facts, Men = Misogyny. Where there is men there is misogyny.
LikeLike
Why not be surprised unattractive women are surly about the getting short-changed in the game of life? it’s no different from dorky guys engaging in “women don’t like us ‘nice guys’ whinefest”. In both cases real men and women get on with their lives while loser men and women sulk alone over the decades (or hang themselves).
LikeLike
Good points. Let’s also not forget that while they claim men are “conditioned by media” to expect certain “body norms,” they never claim that’s the case for their own preference for tall, muscular men with “chiseled cheekbones.”
LikeLike
How do you even condition anyone to like anything in the first place if you can’t manipulate his reactions / emotions and so forth? The environmentalists would at least have a sort of case if people were wired to a machine that made them feel sexually aroused every time they saw a certain kind of woman on the televitz. But no, those idiots think we spontaneously develop attraction to slim women just because they’re being portrayed as “sexy” on TV (whatever the hell that means in this context). (Not to mention that the fashion industry ideal is a creepy looking starved holocaust survivor look-a-like. Yuck. Never liked those for some reason.)
LikeLike
The same media and fashion industry that’ve failed to make boyish anorectics seem attractive to men.
“Intellectuals” like that just don’t have any contact with reality, at any point of their lines of thought. They don’t make sense on any level.
LikeLike
They might not have made the anorexics more attractive to men, but they’ve certainly succeeded in making them socially acceptable. Most American guys would now rather be seen with a woman who was a bit too skinny than one who is a bit too chunky.
For women, social reality is reality. So if socially, it is better to be anorexic, this is what women are going to either strive to be, or hate themselves for not being.
LikeLike
Women are attracted to the male body, not the female body, so they lack insight concerning what is attractive to a man. They don’t have the wiring. So they have to rely more on external sources for ideas about what is considered glamorous or attractive in a woman. They are easy to brainwash in that regard because they had no strong preferences to begin with.
They may also project their own possible preference for a male-ish look onto males. Not sure if that ever happens but if it does it’s a vulnerability that the fashion industry will be glad to abuse, trying as they are to corrupt everything they touch.
Then again, if women choose the fashion industry as their preferred source of information instead of the men they want to attract, they’re being excessively idiotic so must share some of the blame. They’d have better luck looking to the porn industry for cues if they don’t trust the expressed opinions of the men they know. I don’t recall a single famous porn star who was skinny. No wonder, as it’s an extremely competitive industry aimed at men, and basically sells bodies not clothes. There’s not much room for fooling or manipulating your customers there.
LikeLike
“Women are attracted to the male body, not the female body”
That’s not exactly true.
LikeLike
JayMan, Im not challenging your opinion; I just want to offer an explanation of the phenomenon commonly called “bisexuality”,
because the causation is so rarely addressed.
You know how Jews sometime claim they are white and sometime claim they are nonwhite; depending on what benefit they can extract?
A so called “bisexual” is simply a person who is letting you know that its their position, ON THE FRONT END.
Its just trained sexual opportunism; ESPECIALLY for females.
Hollywood is full of that phenomenon. A history of “bisexuality” allows an actor/actress to jumpstart, reflag… their failing career by “coming out as gay” later; if they need the utility of the dynamic.
Which they often do because they have nothing to show for all their young, hot years except the memory of a buncha dicks they took on what they thought was a ride to the top.
“oh no, thats not what I was doing, Im bisexual”
LikeLike
@thwack:
For women especially, it seems sexual orientation exists on a continuum (more so than for men, at least). Bisexual women are typically (though not always) primarily attracted to men, so what you describe is not that unusual…
LikeLike
Women project, true, but in a different way than what you’re suggesting. Women aren’t as interested in what a guy looks like (overall) – we’re attracted to other qualities. Things like confidence, success, accomplishment, and the societal measures thereof. So, when we look at ourselves, we make the mistake of thinking that those are the things men find attractive in us. We project what we find appealing in a potential mate onto ourselves, which is why so many women think their physical appearance isn’t as important to a man as being sassy/confident/independent/strong/whatever.
To a certain degree, men do that too. You’re doing it right here. The physical is the most important factor of attraction to you as a man, and you’re assuming that our primary concern as women is the same.
Ever wonder why lesbians are often hideously dumpy and gay men take such care with their appearance? This is why.
(and seriously? Porn stars aren’t skinny? I don’t think I’ve ever seen a girl over size 4 in mainstream stuff. Hardly the national average.)
LikeLike
That’s the porn that leaks out into the mainstream and ads and the like. In most porn, women were about a size 6 to 12 until fairly recently, partly because in movement and nude, you can’t cover up a lack of boobs and butt, and men did not want to see outlines of bones. The look was young and soft.
When more women started watching porn openly, the women got thinner. In the niches, they’re still curvy though. The waist has always been small, but a 4 simply can’t accommodate D cups.
LikeLike
@Nicole:
“When more women started watching porn openly, the women got thinner. In the niches, they’re still curvy though. The waist has always been small, but a 4 simply can’t accommodate D cups.”
Very interesting point!
LikeLike
Cynthia, you’re missing the context, which was attraction to a body type. I’ve been reading this blog for a while. I’m aware of what you write, and have noticed the phenomena you describe. I remember well that I used to think women were primarily interested in looks, and I wasn’t able to revise my view despite all the puzzling things I kept experiencing which now seem obvious after reading Heartiste. None of that means women don’t like masculine looks more than feminine looks, and might not be projecting that preference onto men.
I also don’t know what you mean by skinny. I know what the word means, but I suppose a fat population like Americans might incorrectly use it to mean normal.
LikeLike
@Cynthia
Good points, wrong topic.
The subject was attraction to body type, so that’s what I was writing about.
LikeLike
Yes. Only politically correct biologic urges must be honored; all the rest must be stamped out with extreme prejudice, or decried as a product of “popular culture”.
LikeLike
Japan’s Philanderers Stay Faithful to Their ‘Infidelity Phones’
I guess not all Japs are hikikomori herbs.
LikeLike
There’s literally an app for that (see Shark Tank).
LikeLike
I wonder if my boyfriend would like fucking me better if I had not gotten a bit fat in the course of my relationship. His tolerance for such is about the lowest I’ve ever seen. I am getting thinner now so I will see if it gets better.
My boyfriend says to his friends that younger hotter women are the cure to erectile dysfunction.
I thnk the problem in my relationship is that my boyfriend is seemingly entirely satisfied with our sex life. I fuck him every day. He gets off. He seems entirely indifferent to whether or not I like doing this.
LikeLike
feministx
I wonder if my boyfriend would like fucking me better if I had not gotten a bit fat in the course of my relationship.
—————————————-
Of course, don’t get fat. But if you want him to marry you, you have to prove to him that you are a soldier in HIS army.
Thats the trouble with women today, they don’t wanna work to “make partner” at the law firm. They don’t want to prove themselves…
This is why every guys need a whole buncha bitches in the mail room lickin envelopes; because half of them are gonna drop out, quit, show up late, get fired…
Your value to the company should increase as your beauty fades. You have to work to become VICE president of the company.
LikeLike
I don’t want to win his heart. I want to feel like I actually want to be in this relationship. Either that or I want to get it together enough to leave.
LikeLike
“I don’t want to win his heart. I want to feel like I actually want to be in this relationship. Either that or I want to get it together enough to leave.”
————————————————————–
In other words, you want a “promotion”. You started out in the mailroom and worked your way up to the 30th floor and feel stuck there.
What are you doing that makes you qualified to be vice president?
Do you understand what being vice president at the company means?
Too many women bitch about being in the mailroom, but when you promote them to vice president, they keep actin like they in the mailroom…
How are you BETTER than any other girl he can get from the mailroom (and I don’t mean fucking and sucking…)
Step it up.
LikeLike
>Of course, don’t get fat. But if you want him to marry you, you have to prove to him that you are a soldier in HIS army.
You forgot dude She is a Feminist, She is independent, strong, confident, highly educated and not in your leagues and above all SHE DOESN’T NEED A MAN.
Woman need man like fish need bicycle.
LikeLike
None of this really matters. If you live in America and can’t afford to live in an insanely overpriced metropolis, you will be surrounded by gross and bitter post-wall women. The few attractive ones are keyed in to long term relationships and will be married off by 27. Alpha will only get you so far in this situation. You may be able to lay a few skeezes at the local bar, but life remains empty and unfufilling. The women will continue to get uglier and more masculine and the country will continue its torturous decline. Marriage with children is not even an option anymore for any man with a modicum of self-worth. The only thing to do really is grow your savings account as much as you can in an unlikely attempt to escape this grim society.
Do you think people are reading these studies and thinking “Hmm yes something must be done, I must change my ways”? No. The truth these days is met with a hand wave and two fingers lodged firmly in lobes, nobody wants to hear it anymore.
LikeLike
Very true. I will be 56 this month and still experience raging boners all the time thanks to ForeignBride. Even after exhaustive roguring followed by buckets of jizz I will wake up 2 hours later with a hard-on. And I’m not taking any supplements. Just throwing that out there for your edification.
LikeLike
[…] [Hotter Women Equals Better Sex: Science Weighs In] […]
LikeLike
[…] Until now. In what is sure to slice clean the last dangly sinew of Source: Chateau Heartiste […]
LikeLike
All hail the boner test
LikeLike
Fat is not inert.
It secretes all kinds of hormones, and past a certain % threshold, makes you even fatter by overwhelming the output of your body’s obesity-regulation cells.
http://healthtrekker.net/quiz-whats-the-largest-endocrine-organ-in-the-human-body-nope-not-that-fellas-its-your-bodyfat-probably-killing-you
Rationalize that, Hamsters! -Because: Science!!
LikeLike
Hey I’m FAT! Damn!
LikeLike
OP: Makes sense!
Field Report, Friday:
Today is a group day. Have a huge group going downtown, we’re gonna hang out, mingle, etc. Cool thing is, we’ve got three chicks who are a lock to be down there with all of us. I’m thinking ‘good, a home base maybe.’
Another friend of mine — let’s just call my PUA-ey friend ‘Mark’ and my other friend ‘Roy,’ and my ‘naysayer’ friend ‘Rich.’ Anyway, the point is, Roy — hearing about these exploits (I trust him to keep them confidential and he’s a good guy), wants to join us in them. Rich — the guy who says sarging is gay and always have a group — is the one responsible for getting us the chicks. I invited a few, but one was ‘sick,’ the other was a ‘maybe’ (she’s a 4 so whatevz), and the last — which brings her group of 4 chicks everywhere — decided to somewhere else.
Me, Roy, and Mark arrive to venue 1. We walk to the back where live music plays. Rich has already engaged a target and is talking with her, sitting down. I get the hint that he wants to be alone, but for whatever reason, Mark lingers. Roy just has no fucking clue — his first instinct is to drink. I decide not to babysit him, and I get to the task of opening sets. First set, on my way back to the main room. 3 girls, hipster 6.5 and two 7’s —- I actually like the 6.5 better because of her style (nah just kidding, I saw her first).
I give them the drug dealer opener — I’m sort of pleased with my delivery. So now, they do the same thing all of them do, apprehensively turn a bit to consider. Almost no enthusiasm. In the middle of their explanations, I transition to hairdresser bit. Still tepid — she’s like ‘no.’ And I mean, she’s like ‘-NO-‘ I continue moving forward, trying to engage the group.
“Now that i have you all here, what about a green mowhawk….?” Blah blah blah she’s hot, blah blah blah I want to trust her. The 6.5 sort of cuts me off, fairly quickly ‘yeah no, don’t get the mohawk. I like how you have it now.’ But it’s flatly delivered. By this point I practically feel blown out, but fuck it — you know?
I launch into another little routine
“You’re the bad ones, and she’s the good one. I know she’s wearing the leather jacket, but she’s the good one.”
There’s laughter here, but it’s kind of nervous. I fucked up somewhere along the way — OR they’re just not digging me. I can’t think of anything else to say in the face of such a neutral, bordering on several IOD’s, set. So…I remember what Mark said “Listen, if you have to leave…don’t say something stupid like ‘nice meeting you,’ because that’s an admission of defeat. Just say like…’cheers, the night is young.’ Never communicate defeat.” So, I do just that ‘cheers the night is young,’ and I eject. I realize that A2 is probably going to be a significant challenge — shit, the Hook point is probably still a challenge, despite whatever luck I had.
I walk into the bar, make a quiet — SLOW — circuit. I try to look around, distracted as I move. I notice this set of filipino/asian girls. Why the shit not? Logistically, it’s the only set that makes sense. None of them are above a 5.5, so who gives a shit.
I pull the same routine — phew, are they not having it. Like, just not having it. I plow on, I get to the DHV story, I do the whole ‘good v bad.’ Nothing much — they seem uncomfortable. I figure ‘hey, either they just don’t like me, or I can work on coming across less -awk-”
Next set, back in the live music area. I approach Rich — who is still talking with a girl, she’s like a 5 (puffy cheeks, but hipster style). Mark is STILL standing there near them. He talks to me for a second. I notice a set of girls — can’t see them well — I step away to open.
Same routine, there’s three of them. A 7, a tiny little 5, and a 7.5. Here it goes. Turns out, the 7 (target) is actually a hairdresser. Cool! I transition from green mohawk talk to explaining that my hairdresser friend is crazy — ‘are you crazy like her?’ She’s quick to say ‘oh yeah we’re crazy’ blah blah blah. I tell the story, I add what Ya said to add — like the part of about not hitting him because he’s too ugly and the guy apologizing. She seems to go with it and laugh, but my gut says ‘polite.’ I ask her what she does for fun (yeah probably lame as phuck, but whatevs). She talks about how she goes here, and I just kind of laugh with a shrug. Then, she says she plays Soul Calibur. She asks if I know what that is…I say yeah, I used to play that — and other fighting games —- with an ex-gf all the time.
By now, the 7.5 has turned away, and Mark comes in to engage the 5 — cool. I continue talking. I say ‘well we could play sometime, but….you’re probably a bad loser.’ And she’s like ‘yes, I am!’ She actually gets the attention of her other friend ‘aren’t I a really bad loser?’ blah blah blah. And I’m like ‘yeah, it’d be cool to play, but I don’t want you throwing the controller everywhere.’ And she’s like ‘well I don’t curse usually…’ I’m like ‘psh…you know you do.’ She’s like ‘well only when I lose!’
Now, some other chick comes in — also hot, like a 7.5 — to talk. She seems pretty unimpressed with me. I try to include her, yadda yadda yadda, before I know it, they’re all walking to the dancefloor, save the 5 who is still talking with my friend. Mentally I’m just like ‘goddammit.’
I ain’t done yet.
I walk back into the quieter area, and I open a set. Bad news — dim lighting made a 4.5 and a 5.5 look like a 6 and 7 in profile. So they turn, and I instantly am like ‘man FML.’
But I run the routine — it’s going pretty well I guess. They’re both hairdressers — go figure, I’m on fire. Fairly soon I run out of things to say, and not that I’m some sort of Don Juan who could have fucked them if I tried, but I just lost steam. I didn’t want to fuck them, so I just kinda maintained some friendly convo for a few minutes. I noticed that the 5.5 touched me several times, but she could have been drunk — and I didn’t care. So I eject soon enough.
Time to change venues!
Venue 2, right across.
Walk in and open a set of three girls. 6, 7, 6.5. It’s icy as phuck. If the first said seemed extremely neutral, this one is borderline ‘naaah not interested’ in every iota of body language and tone. But I move it through the material — at the very least they can be practice.
Whatevs, time to keep on moving. We see people we know soon enough (this is what I hate about downtown, I always see at least 5-15 people I know, and they distract me from the MISSION!). So, there’s these two girls…one’s like a 4 (kinda chubby but she tries to dress nice and is uber feminine and is super nice), and the other is like a 5.5. Me and Mark make some idle chit-chat, and the 4.5 compliments me on how I look — handsome blah blah blah blah.
Next set after that timesuck is three girls. One’s a 7, the other two are like 6.5’s. I do the drug dealer line, and then the one in the center- — 6.5 — is like ‘wait do YOU have weed?’ she gets in my face and grabs my blazer. I notice she’s sloppy. Goddammit, a drunk chick. I say ‘all of it. All the world’s weed.’ She’s like ‘yeah right! You don’t have any weed.’ Then I shrug and am Iike ‘I don’t even know what weed is.’ Then she’s just like ‘get the fuck out then!” And she pushes me away, but then I turn around, faking shock, and she’s like ‘I’m…I’m just kidding.’
So, I blow through hairdresser routine, DHV story — it’s some polite conversation. I pull the good v bad card. I get to know what all of them do. They’re lukewarm. They all tell me what they do, and the 6.5 legit says something that intrigues me — I tell them I’m almost done with law school ,and she says she almost went to law school to do environmental law. That’s a subject near and dear to my heart. So I’m like ‘wouldn’t it be some shit if crazy 6.5 was the girl of my dreams, hahahahaha.’
I decide to switch targets to the 6.5 (whatever, she’s drunk, may be easier, she’s also kino’d me several times — not that that means shit when she’s sorta hammered). So I’m like, “who’s your favorite ninja turtle?” She’s like “ninja turtles, what the fuck?” I turn away from her a bit “Whaaaaaat…well, I thought you were her, but maybe not.” Her friend intercepts and is kind of advocating for her a little bit. Then 6.5 is like ‘okay, okay, Leonardo.’ And I’m like ‘okay…well that earns you another question….how about animals?” It’s hard to hear, and her answer was about kittens—she’s a dog person — but I remember — don’t lean in — so I have to ask like 3 times to hear wtf she said. Here, the set sort of nosedives. I just think I’m failing to build legit attraction….it seems pretty hard with three or more girls there. I honestly don’t remember, but at some point I was joking about the drunk girl being girl of my dreams, and then the 7 is like ‘she was ready to push you down a few minutes ago!’ and I’m like ‘oh yeah…whoa…’ and she’s like ‘yeah, you better get out of here.’ Not long after that, I kinda just tried to get the hint and move on to other pastures.
Next set!
This is actually funny. So I see these two asian chicks sitting near the bar, and I pull out the same routine. SURPRISE, SURPRISE — they were part of the group at the earlier bar. I didn’t even realize it until she was like ‘yeah…….we heard this before…except, my other friend was the hairdresser.’ I blink…then I just laugh my ass off. I get their names because I’m like ‘well we just shared an experience…”
Unfortunately, at this point, I was summoned to a table at the back by my friends, and the 4 told me to sit beside her. So I did. She kinda complained “usually there’s like 15 guys I want to fuck at a bar, but tonight…nothing.” I don’t give a shit, so I’m like ‘yeah, tryin’ to bang girls, tryin’ to bang guys can be tough.’ She complimented me several times on shit I ain’t interested in…like ‘you’re really nice, you’re so sweet.’ BARFORAMA. Later she’s like ‘see that guy, I want to fuck him.’ I’m like ‘nice! you should go do it.’
Meanwhile, somehow everyone lost track of Roy. Roy has just done nothing the entire night. But I text him and tell him where we are. The 4 is like ‘oh I don’t like him, he acts like he’s too good for everyone.’ I’m like lol. When he gets there, I have them talk, then I leave to make another circuit. On my way, I run into that earlier set — the 6.5’s and the 7. I’m just like ‘you guys again?!’ Blah blah blah…I call the drunk 6.5 crazy, and she’s like ‘call me crazy again and I’ll…I’ll punch you…’ and I fake a gasp, then she hugs me and is like ‘I’m just so drunk.’ So, she’s drunk, her friends ain’t into me, so I bounce.
There were other people we talked to, but they were people we knew, and to be honest, who even gives a shit?
Friday’s thoughts:
Eh….still having trouble with A2 obviously. I’m thinking about getting something else to say along with the hairdresser line. On the plus side, at this point I really don’t give a fuck about approaching. I mean, I get the butterflies, but I just do it. The last two nights maybe spoiled me a little in that I just was like ‘man, I got numbers…any night now I’m just gonna get a makeout/first night lay/wooooooooooooooooo!’ Lol.
Not the case. Still tripping over some basic shit. Kinda think that the sets that have gone well have gone well because the chicks were just open to my looks etc. But then again, those could just be negative thoughts after a nonstarter night like this.
Also, it kind of sucks to go somewhere where a lot of your friends are, because they just eat a lot of your time. Like, if they don’t know what’s up. And I mean….it’d be one thing if they were some hot girls or whatever but ehhhhhh…..:D
LikeLike
“The last two nights maybe spoiled me a little in that I just was like ‘man, I got numbers…any night now I’m just gonna get a makeout/first night lay/wooooooooooooooooo!’ Lol.”
This will fuck with you FOREVER. There’s a bunch of psychology involving the ego and outcome dependence and validation shit involved in it but basically this will mess with you over and over for the rest of your days going out lol. It’s sort of the universe’s way of keeping you humble.
Tips for tonight:
You’re engaging them now which is a step up but the vibe of “if you don’t run away, you’re in serious danger of me fucking your brains out” isn’t there yet. You’re getting lukewarm responses because the interaction goes sideways in limbo instead of forwards and the girls see you as asexual and not a threat, which is fine if they just meet you via your social circle on a random Tuesday but when they’re out drinking at a bar hoping to get fucked, if you’re not progressing toward that you’re just taking up time that they could be investing in a guy who will fuck them, know what I mean? Sort of the same vibe that you have when your friends are sucking up your sarging time and you’re like “hey ya cool man that’s great but I gotta go to this place with this thing to do this stuff, later!!”
For example what’s the difference between this:
“I tell them I’m almost done with law school”
“who’s your favorite ninja turtle?”
“okay…well that earns you another question….how about animals?”
And this:
“I’m like ‘who the FUCK is out here?’”
“‘fucking right, you pop the collar when you’re bringing the funk.’”
“So I just stop and look straight at her ‘I will FUCK the shit out of you.’”
…aside from the F-Bombs lol. Like in terms of Intent and dominating the set.
See what’s happening now is girls don’t hate you anymore and your ego likes that, so it’s chasing validation and you flip from “fuck it I’m going to say and do whatever I want and if she has a problem with that, fuck her” to “why isn’t this hairdresser routine working like last time?? They don’t seem into me quick what else can I throw at them so that hopefully they’ll validate me??”
The girls from last night had no idea you have a cock. 🙂 End result is friendly polite interactions but no attraction.
See as a short guy you’re kind of like an Asian where by default they’re going to categorize you as “not someone to think about sexually” because it’s not something they’re used to since most short guys are lame and insecure and asexual “dancing monkey” clowns in the group. So much like an Asian (hit up YouTube and watch some Simple Pickup videos with Kong), you need to shit all over their expectations and not allow them to label you as asexual…which is what you did with the “fuck the shit out of you” girl, there was no question in that girls mind that you have a cock and would slap her around with it lol vs the ninja turtle girl who’s like “why are we talking about this??”
So, tonight keep your routine stack going but now try adding something with Intent to your toolbox, so they know you have a cock and aren’t their little brother. (this is another reason hotter girls are better, it’s way easier to come off sexual because you legit WANT to fuck them)
The simplest ways of adding this in are thru innuendo, misinterpretation (interpreting things she says in a sexual way) and sexual roleplaying. Your “I love you” stuff from before was good because that showed some Intent but it still wasn’t SEXUAL.
So now you want it to look more like drug dealer, hairdresser, (sexual stuff), cold-read her, (misinterpretation), DHV story, qualify her, (show sexual intent).
So off the top of my head maybe take the hairdresser story and give her a reason for wanting to fuck with you. “Green Mohawk blah blah…but I don’t know if I trust her. I kind of pissed her off because we hooked up a while back and I didn’t call her back so I have a feeling she’s just fucking with me for revenge now lol what do you think?”
(girls say their answer)
“Cool. Have you ever had a guy not call you the day after you hook up? I think she’s overreacting but I know I can be a dick sometimes.”
(girl blabbing)
“Wow really? You’re totally the clingy type aren’t you lol are you going to be hanging out outside my bedroom window every night and leaving me drunk voicemails?”
(whatever reaction, tease her and roleplay here a bit then cut her off)
“Honestly the reason I didn’t call her…well I shouldn’t tell you it’ll make me sound like an asshole lol (tell me!!!) okay well she honestly wasn’t very good in bed…but she thinks she’s hot shit and has no idea and I don’t think anyone will tell her because she’s hot lol what do you think, should I be honest about it or just avoid her? I really don’t even want to hook up with her again lol”
Now this isn’t going to get you laid, but it’s going to take you down a different path than your routine stack has been taking you down so far. The main purpose of this is just to demonstrate to yourself “okay if I talk about ninja turtles and puppies I end up in this place and the vibe has this feeling…but if I talk about sex and hooking up, I end up in THIS place and the vibe has this other feeling.”
A lot of pickup is about guiding and redirecting the flow of the conversation toward your goal. So if the girl talks about sex, cool, you can sit back and let that river flow. But if she’s talking about puppies you throw in a little innuendo by misinterpreting something she said in a sexual way and now you’ve guided that river back on course.
Now keep in mind this stuff will get you blown out harder and shit-tested more and it’ll feel incongruent at first, which sucks because its like “but I want results naaaooowwwww!” but remember we’re looking at this long-term, you could spend all winter just getting this down before you start getting laid. We’re talking 1000 sets not 20, you know? Down the road you’ll be more consistent, like these days I can open and build basic attraction with most sets no problem, but my game/state is pretty consistent from going out a lot…as a new guy your game/state is going to fluctuate like crazy through massive highs and lows all night long until you start to stabilize it. It’s like someone throwing their first few punches of their life vs a boxer who’s been training for a while. They’re both punching but the boxer’s accuracy is going to be consistent compared to the wild swings of the other guy.
Also remember that getting more polarized reactions is okay because we know passing shit-tests builds attraction so down the road you’ll be able to pass their shit-tests and capitalize on the emotional roller-coaster you put them through.
But right now you’ll probably just get blown out a bunch…but hey getting blown out by a 9 for telling her you fucked your hairdresser is more fun than sitting inside playing Xbox alone. 🙂
LikeLike
Got some advice in Moderation, check this spot before you head out tonight, hopefully it gets approved in time for you to apply it tonight lol
LikeLike
Update: Rich’s girl wasn’t a cold approach. He had met her before, several times. Lol
LikeLike
Just wanted to address this quick:
1) His girl was a 5 give or take, and 2) He knew her from before.
You’ll find the naysayer types, even if they get laid a lot, tend to be getting laid by average-at-best chicks and like 90% of the time it’s from their social circles.
Pay attention to who, of your friends, LEGITIMATELY cold-approaches and pulls and you’ll find that it’s probably none of them. 🙂 It’s a very rare skill to cultivate…especially consistently. Most Naturals became Naturals through exposure to women via social circles, not cold-approaching.
So keep in mind when they slag you about “it’s weird to go talk to random people dude, cut it out”, that you’re working on a skillset they can’t even wrap their heads around.
“When someone gives you advice, ask yourself if they’re at LEAST as successful as you want to be. If not, take it with a grain of salt.”
LikeLike
I’m not familiar with the filtering inner workings, but it seems that it’s a semi-manual control because there were no approvals granted over the weekend. But it should be updated soon. Anyways, looking forward to reading your analysis of Scray’s latest field report.
LikeLike
Lol, hope it gets up soon.
LikeLike
Oh yeah!
Rich went somewhere with that one girl, so good on him.
Mark just ended up mostly talking to people he knew all night.
Roy just….had no clue.
LikeLike
[…] Hotter Women Equals Better Sex: Science Weighs In « Chateau Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Size of load and squirt distance?
I officially rate this column = Junior High School
Looking forward to the next entry discussing spitballs and cootie quarantine advice.
LikeLike
WTF Science! Of course, the hotter the woman the harder the boner! You dont say! Srsly? Thats where these guys spend their grant? I figured that out when I was 12, without a degree and all
LikeLike
What has been missing from the science and the hours of “ED” commercials we are forced to watch is that the problem lies not in our anatomy.
Yes, maybe at 18 any man can get it up for even a flabby 55-year-old woman. But at 30? 40? 60? Not likely, and it’s not a function of “not being man enough.”
LikeLike
Heartiste,
I think the hags at Salon are upset again.
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/pat_robertson_awful_looking_women_are_ruining_marriages/
LikeLike
Apparently, the Fujitsu F-03 phone is the way to keep your 8 LTR from finding out about your 6s and 7s.
“If Tiger Woods had this Japanese feature in his phone, he wouldn’t have gotten in trouble,” said Mr. Natsuno, now a professor at Keio University’s Graduate School of Media and Governance.
Harem management is a key skill that should keep evolving.
LikeLike
10 scale is too close. Go for 3 scales of 10 for ugly, alright/cute, & hot/dime. Also known as 30 scale.
LikeLike
Like Patrice O’Neal did.
LikeLike
Saw a fat chick today. Despite the extra weight her face was still an easy 8, and she would be a guaranteed 9 and good contender for a 10 if it wasn’t for the fat. Even in her lardness she managed to keep a more appealing shape than most women her weight as the fat was distributed all over the body instead of being focused in her gut. What a waste.
LikeLike
I have a brother, who might be a little Aspergie. A PhD in Physics from a good American University sort of nails that one down.
But he works in the Oil Business!!! God be Praised. His quirky ideas and original insights regarding computer analysis of deep geophysical strata are on the fast track to earn him MicroSoft amounts of cash.
By some measures, the amount of personal wealth in Houston Tx. exceeds almost anywhere. Our Live Stock Show and Rodeo attracts some 2.25 million visitors. yearly.At the start of the rodeo, something like 1500 riders head downtown. Most are on matched and specifically bred horses with a ranch or family crest displayed By families that have big ranches near the city and can breed enough beautiful horses and enough beautiful children who can keep those full grown horses under tight control as they stumbled past the crowds
Of course it is all show-business. But it is a very, very hard thing to fake.
LikeLike
Thanks Rum, that was very insightful.
– No One
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
I love Rum’s comments.
Just like gbfm and other commenters, he delivers insights coming straight from outer space.
LikeLike
A clue: Take a picture of your daughter age 11 helping to drag out a colt ,, that will be her colt because its your ranch and there is the end of it.
Fast forward past 4-5 years of daily practice and rehersal She wins a gold for first place in front of 40,000 people.
Tell me how to edit this.
Ass hole: try to explain how you would dimeniash this healthy human activity.
LikeLike
Yes, so-called “erectile dysfunction” is at least in part a consequence of men trying to have sex with post-menopausal, flabby women.
The pharmaceutical companies have started changing their advertising campaigns to acknowledge this reality:
http://www.lightlybraisedturnip.com/viagro-advertisement/
LikeLike
Guys may have preferences, but they are not generally so shallow as to not be able to get it up for their life partner unless they have fetishes or are Gay. I understand the crowd here is generally party guys, but for the most part, marriage minded men are quite forgiving of physical flaws. All of them think about what the woman might look like when she’s old or if she gets ill or injured.
What they are not forgiving of however, is stupidity and screwed upness. I think the problem is that they can’t get it up for an “empowered” harpy who plays mind games they are no longer hot enough to get away with.
Love is a crazy thing, and lust is crazy but with a method in its madness. There are many factors that make a woman sexy, and beauty is one, but personal needs is running a very close second. For most guys over the age where they’ll follow a hot chick around like a puppy no matter what manner of harpy she is, personal value gets even closer.
You try getting it up for a woman who berates you because you don’t make enough money for them to spend like idiots or because you don’t stack the dishes like she does, for 10+ years, no matter how hot she is or was.
LikeLike
Actually, I’m starting to suspect something at work here.
K-selected men (the monogamous, mostly “beta” types) probably have lower sex drives overall than more r-selected types. Being K-selected, they would have likely also evolved to be far more discriminating in their erotic preferences. It is indeed possible that (at least some) men in the lifetime-mating crowd are more vulnerable to losing desire for their partner, especially if she changes drastically physically.
LikeLike
I like this theory. You could be on to something. It needs to be investigated.
LikeLike
*tingles*
LikeLike
I don’t think testosterone levels are to blame in the specific situation of long term relationships because it really doesn’t take much. I have neutered cats who performed mating behaviors more than five years after being snipped. What happened was though, that they developed a weird preference for a specific type after. One has a calico fetish. Cats supposedly can’t distinct any but bright colors, but somehow this one manages to go for the spotty ginger and black every time. Another prefers gray and white long hairs. Another prefers a specific black male. It’s kind of funny how he dotes over him and is basically the girl in the pair. Sweet and cuddly as he is with the black cat, he will rip others to shreds for getting too close to his food.
Lower testosterone makes a man more picky to be sure, but I’m doubtful it actually lowers the sex drive in the ways that count for long term since they placed a higher value on nurturing and expressions of behavioral fitness than they would for a tryst. I think what the women are losing is their respect for their men’s manhood. Over familiarity is breeding contempt because the women gain the upper hand or think they have, and they’re expressing this in ways that rightfully turn the man off.
You know this. When a man feels rejected in every other way, he’s not going to feel welcome or generous in bed.
I understand it’s not a popular fact, but it is a fact that men are generally amazingly loving people, and attach *everything* else in their lives to that. In some of the worst actually oppressive regimes on Earth, the vast majority love their wives and live and die for them every day. Some women anyone would look at and say they are definitely no great beauties are loved more than someone’s life. I can count the women I’ve ever seen love anyone with all their soul, mind, and body with a shy unassuming man on one hand, but I couldn’t count the men I’ve seen in love like this with a woman who wasn’t particularly objectively beautiful on forty hands.
If I’m naive, it is because this has been my observation, and I am open to being proven wrong, but I have never known a guy who was in love who lost desire just because a woman got old. I accept the possibility of it, but I’ve just never seen or heard of it. When a guy lost it, it was either because he had a problem with sex that got worse from his own aging, or he came out of the closet, or because of being tired of taking her crap.
LikeLike
Very insightful. Were it not a capital crime here, I might say, “You go girl!”
[Heartiste: It’s not a capital crime, but it is a stylistic crime. The worse of the two, if you ask me.]
LikeLike
I say women should quit the Beta Guys, Let them suffer so that they can do something about their awkwardness, QUIT THE BETA WOMEN, LOVE THE ALPHA.
LikeLike
I suffer from erectile dysfunction when in the presence of obese, unattractive women. It’s kind of a self defense mechanism to ensure the future of my glorious genome.
LikeLike
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2261427/Husband-tricked-believing-wifes-children-awarded-25K–bereavement-Devoted-father-deceived-years-DNA-tests-revealed-truth.html
LikeLike
My contempt for White Knights grow geometrically! What a severe CUNT. Really needs to be horse-whipped.
LikeLike
The above comment might be un-done without causing any offense to me.
LikeLike
I don’t know if you’ve seen this yet, but New York Times has a super-hamster-riffic article today: “Darwin was wrong about dating”, in which some guy claims that the studies supporting Darwinism and evo-psych in gender relations are methodologically flawed and thus everything is just a product of culture or circumstance.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/13/opinion/sunday/darwin-was-wrong-about-dating.html?ref=global-home&_r=0&gwh=0D002D49AEAE84E1EB5FFB1AE3D2F54C
For example, he claims, the famous study in which 50-70% of men were open to going to a member of the opposite sex’s apartment or having sex but only 0-3% of women were, is flawed because “70% of women would opt for sex if they were approached by a celebrity or a person whom a friend had assured them that he was good in bed”. I kid you not.
2nd, even if this were somehow true (and it is not), as if feminism had somehow warped the natural female preferences into same preference for casual sex, it would still be a damning indictment of the female gender today. What fool wants to deal with women who are so promiscuous and aggressive?
LikeLike
I mean, the mere fact that you’d have to bribe women with George Clooney or a friend-recommended sex-god to have casual sex on the same scale as men automatically confirms the first study, not disprove it. Their hamster is just staggering.
LikeLike
+1
Invariably you’ll find that the feminist and/or PC SWPL attempts at counter-argument only drive home the validity of the points they’re trying to gainsay.
LikeLike
The opposite of feminism, a marginal group in Malaysia:
LikeLike
I would love to hear comments on the video…
LikeLike
We’ll get around to commenting once we’re over the shock.
LikeLike
They got the least attractive woman to be in charge of the “stop pleasing your man” wives club.
LOL
LikeLike
lol, i noticed that too, and was sure you guys would notice it too… lol
LikeLike
It’s all well and good, but the polygamy screws up the society. Only a society which guarantees a (obedient, subservient) wife for every hard-working beta nerd can advance the way the West did in recent history. And due to the sex ratio being what it is, only monogamy (in which the woman is subservient, of course) is the solution.
LikeLike
That guy seems legitimately happier than a lot of the monogamous schlubs I see day to day.
The journalists theme of using shaming language put me off.
Lol at what thwack said below. +1
LikeLike
I guess it’s way harder to get cornered into a sexless life if you have 3 backup wifes.
Being a bitch going into sex-strike kinda looses it’s leverage in that situation….
LikeLike
And when you think about it, what would you prefer, after 30 years? Being the third virgin wife to a successful man, or riding the carousel and feeling all empowered and shit?
LikeLike
Lol rhetorical question. Great find on the vid
LikeLike
I’ve found an old but interesting article about a girl who married a PUA (http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/would_you_date_pickup_artist_vH53Jh9hJ6DOCVXsMYJvnN/0) Aren’t they sweet? He said that “One coffee sitting down with Amanda is worth a million other girls in bed, as far as I’m concerned.” Sooo cute ❤
[Heartiste: Chicks dig beta vulnerability game.]
LikeLike
I spilled my coffee over this :D.
LikeLike
Was sick of reading 10 FUCKING PAGES OF FALSEHOOD on GOOGLE
and finally found the truth, now on the first page of results! ;D
http://mayhaan.blogspot.com/2013/01/men-are-genetically-superior-to-women.html
LikeLike
Nice read.
LikeLike
We need a study for that too?
LikeLike
But basically, we’re at least 15% less chimps than women.
Good to know.
PS: lol @ bitches.
LikeLike
Thank You gents, just thought this was relevant.
LikeLike
Ape shall make fun of ape!
lol
LikeLike
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/homo-consumericus/201301/facial-scars-sexy-or-unattractive
Facial scars create badboy effect and make men more attractive for short-term relationships.
LikeLike
Reddit co-founder hangs himself
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/13/technology/aaron-swartz-internet-activist-dies-at-26.html?_r=1&
“Mr. Wolf said he would remember his nephew, who had written in the past about battling depression and suicidal thoughts, as a young man who looked at the world, and had a certain logic in his brain, and the world didnt necessarily fit in with that logic, and that was sometimes difficult.”
I can’t help suspecting that he saw the hamster and went mad.
LikeLike
I came here just now to see what the reaction is here.
Aaron seems to have been an uber-Omega despite getting rich (temporarily) from the sale of Reddit.
Was he gay?
If hetero, did he ever have a decent looking gf or a gf at all?
I’m tired of reading the conspiracy stories. Whether he was assassinated or not is not so relevant to what I want to know. What I want to know is whether this dude was Omega or Beta.
LikeLike
Patrice O’Neal, last interview.
Every point he makes is not only valid, but they even get verified by the black female sitting right next to him. His observation of the difference between white and black women AND WHY is so simple and beautiful it could be expressed as a mathematical equation.
Also, about halfway through he mentions the role of “The Uniform” and the key effect it has on game, relationships and the sexual market place.
The concept of “the uniform” really needs to be understood because it drives so much behavior. And its very destructive because as guys, we choose the hot woman (the uniform) and forget that she gotta go straight to the mail room and lick envelopes
We get fooled because we allow her to start on the 40th floor BECAUSE of the effect “her uniform” has on OTHER PEOPLE!
(((SHAKIN MY HEAD)))
So many guys get destroyed because they let a bitch join the company as VICE PRESIDENT!
And its all because of that “uniform” they did nothing to earn! If you tolerate these bitches, you deserve to have your company destroyed.
BTW, theres a lot of white people walkin around doing the same thing. Checkin and collectin based on that God Damn “uniform”; they got no skills, they missin, let me see ya box, you swingin like a girl…
Then they walk up to me and say, “hey coon, you got my money?”
This is the shit I gotta deal with every fucking day.
FUCK YOU.
I knew there was a connection between game and racism; I knew it!
This is why the discussions here, if they go on long enough, always degenerate into “race war”.
H blames us and we blame H, but its really nobodies fault.
LikeLike
hotter woman and them dripping everywhere but it still gets old allthough she has taken to waking me up with blowjobs and it still feels good to be at center of attention in a club from girls and guys
LikeLike
LOL Greg,
You are so random. I love it!
LikeLike
and not a period, comma or capital letter to be foung.
LikeLike
LOL He’s like his own version of GFBM. LOL
LikeLike
yea my dick is the cure i guess she giving me her 10k tax return for getting her off the ho street and off drugs
hows that for random he he he
and she doesnt mention suicide anymore cured of that too she knows she wants to live
next on the save a ho show i pull a chicken out a vag
LikeLike
😕 LOL.
LikeLike
Meanwhile:
“A 300-pound plus woman has been hospitalized with a broken arm after falling through a New York sidewalk on Friday night.
The incident happened when the 31-year-old woman attempted to shelter from the rain outside a restaurant on Manhattan’s Upper East Side.
According to witnesses, the sidewalk gave way underneath her and she fell about seven foot into the basement of the Atomic Wings restaurant at the Blue Room Grill on the corner of East 60th Street and 2nd Avenue.
Emergency Medical Services and the Fire Department were called to the scene and the woman was eventually pulled out of the hole.
FDNY Fire Chief Thomas Jemmott told the New York Post that the woman had to be pulled up in a ‘high-angle rescue unit,’ which resembles a crane with cargo netting.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2261411/Sidewalk-COLLAPSES-beneath-overweight-woman-runs-rain-New-York-City.html
LikeLike
As one needs hotter and hotter women as one gets older in order to keep it up, can anyone recommend what supplements/foods to take to also keep it up (without messing with the heart rate in a temporary action like the v drug does).
Saw Palmetto? Is that good?
LikeLike
If you don’t already exercise?
Before you start “takin stuff”; hit the gym, pound the heavy bag for 20 minutes, skip rope, get good on the speed bag, shadow box in front of the mirror working the jab and combos and duckin while dancing…
and drink water, lots of water.
You may not need anything but the woman.
LikeLike
BTW, Neil Armstrong will be on Oprah today admitting the Apollo moon landing was fake.
I always suspected it was a fraud.
LikeLike
His resurrection from the dead, though, is news indeed.
LikeLike
wtf?
LikeLike
He meant Lance Armstrong, admitting to doping… WHOA, WHAT A SURPRISE!!!
LikeLike
[…] 4. Regardless of a man’s age, a slimmer waisted woman is associated with greater erectile function. Science lends evidence to what everyone already knew anyway. h/t Instapundit. Update: Heartiste also wrote on it here. […]
LikeLike
I remember a study somewhere that men are so hardwired for slim waists that using digital images, men preferred women with biologically impossible slim waists.
LikeLike
Biologically impossible until Dita Von Teese… 😉
LikeLike
The Swiss banned the distribution of pornography on mobile phones back in 2007. And now a bill is pending that will make not only possession, but also the consumption of hardcore pornography declared punishable.
It was just in the news today, link to the article via google translate.
Any comments on that?
LikeLike
There is something very ironically “white” about this; I just don’t have a name for it.
King A probably knows what it is.
LikeLike
Paradoxical Honky Prohibition Syndrome
LikeLike
No, what I mean is, white men are smart to be able to invent something like the mobile phone, and then these same white men use them to look at porn… LOL
This may just be the price we all have to pay for the benefit of having smart white men?
You don’t like it?
Move to Haiti.
LikeLike
I don’t think there is a term for it, but there should be. I am always referring people to this Steve Sailer link, which distills thwackian wisdom into a plausible if casual theory:
http://takimag.com/article/the_golden_age_of_white_male_antisocial_media/print
White men are nerdish, aggressive cataloguers of quantifiable data, which is why we have science and technology. And also sabremetrics, Nate Silver, and Dungeons and Dragons.
It deserves sociological study, but like all things notable about racial differences, we can only speak of it in whispers outside of polite company. Or “Racism has a new name: HBD.”
Matt
LikeLike
It seems to pertain to kiddy porn, bestiality, coprophila and “violent” porn, so it’s not all pornography. Slippery slope nonetheless.
LikeLike
What has the world come to when we need a blog post to tell us that hotter women = better sex?
*shakes head*
LikeLike
[…] Science: Men are attracted to attractive women. (Shocking!) Science: Hotter women leads to better sex. […]
LikeLike
whaddup heartist this is a good use of Science. check this out so i was bangin this stripper chick with big fake titties and for real i bet i shot a load like 10 feet. it landed on her kids pillow
LikeLike
This is only a measure of a male’s response to women’s looks. There’s a lot more that goes into good sex. If the woman has sexual trauma, for example, no matter how good she looks she will be adisastrous fuck. Hotter women might have more experience since more men are persuing them, but that doesn’t mean they’re willing or good at it.
LikeLike
Coherent with this blast from the past…
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/why-i-left-my-fat-wife/
LikeLike