• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Mind Of The Manboob: Hugo Schwyzer Redux
Reader Mailbag: A Valentine’s Day Plea »

From Vikings To Vaginas

February 14, 2013 by CH

What happened to the Nordics? Once a virile, conquering race of people who struck fear in the hearts of enemies, they have been reduced to a feminist utopia of sniveling beta males who are encouraged to pee sitting down and aggro women who’d rather go clubbing with earthy foreign invaders.

How could a race of man fall so low, so fast?

In the quest for an answer to this great mystery of mass manboobization, a commenter over at Parapundit serves this up:

I suspect the Scandinavians with the strongest temperaments left long ago as Vikings, same as that the bravest Englishmen left for the colonies.

The only ones who are left are the descendants of the guys who stayed home to weave with the womenfolk.

Or pule about “white privilege”.

Yes, I think there is something to this hypothesis. The alpha males of North and West Europe either moved away or died off in endless wars and pillages, and now their homelands are repositories of soft-tittied beta males.

There’s no denying that beta male skewed societies are nice places to live. Scandinavia enjoys high standards of living, low crime (until recently), a plethora of comfort-maximizing gadgets, good-looking women, and generally non-dictatorial government (until recently). As poolside (or hot springs-side) countries go, the Norselands are right up there with the most pampering of them.

So, beta male countries > alpha male countries.

But here’s the catch. Too many betas and no alphas makes Jakob a plush target.

Pure speculation, but it has bite… a nation needs its alpha males to keep the manboobery impulses of its softer, kinder, gentler beta males in check. Otherwise, some other nation’s alpha males will fill the vacuum left by the real or cultural disappearance of the native alphas, waltzing in to do the job because the native betas decided open borders to a whole world of vengeful, antagonistic losers is smart policy.

Exhibit A: Multiculturalism. Who pushes this shit? The descendants of Viking berserkers? No. Just look at the advocates of masochistic, self-annihilating ideologies and you will see a blubberers’ row of pudgy, chipmunk-cheeked herblings, snarky hunchbacks, watery eyed dweebs, space cadet neohippies, formless male feminists and, on the other side of the gender bender ledger, manjawed clitdicks, bullheaded warboars, jet-fueled rationalization hamsters, mustachioed grievance whores and shameless status seekers.

The beta male’s greatest strengths — his cooperativeness, friendliness, credulity, magnanimity, trust and openness — are also his nation’s undoing when allowed to express unopposed. He needs the wariness, leadership, skepticism, protectiveness, fighting spirit and stone cold instinct for survival of his brother alphas to prevent him from imploding into a blob of depraved navel-gazing, hoisting his red rump for any and all who’d love nothing more than to sharpen their knives in his flesh and lube their cocks in his forgiving bottom. Exhibit B.

A nation of tops is Zimbabwe. A nation of bottoms is raped into the history books. The West would be wise to reverse course for the middle ground.

Finishing off on a positive note, the system may be self-correcting. Ironically, feminism is likely selecting for the sexual success of more aggressive, high testosterone alphas. The removal of societal constraints on female sexuality allows for the flourishing of women’s hypergamous impulses, and women, adorable hypocrites that they are, can’t help but defy their open claims to the contrary to prefer sensitive betas, and instead swoonly spread for the love of anti-feminist men strong in mind and body.

The self-correction is not guaranteed, and for this glaring reason: widely available, cheap contraceptives and abortifacients. A turn to alpha male sexual success does not necessarily mean a turn to alpha male procreative success, as it would have in the past. It could be that the West is currently experiencing the worst of all worlds: feminism-abetted unfettered female sexuality coupled with hamster tingling for irresponsible cads and migrant males.

Is this post speculative? Yes. Did you feel a shiver of omen in these words? I bet you did. Stay tuned.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Alpha, Beta, Globalization, Goodbye America, The Id Monster | 305 Comments

305 Responses

  1. on February 14, 2013 at 3:57 pm Tyrone

    WWII killed the baddest of the Germans. Scandinavia doesn’t have that excuse. However WWII gave cultural Marxists and female-centric governance short term apparent moral superiority over more masculine government and it seems to have gotten out of hand as they gaiend ever more power. Socialism just made them progressively softer each generation thereafter.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 7:42 pm cynthia

      WWII killed Europe’s will to defend its national and ethnic heritage, in its entirety, but they’re still racist as fuck. Part of the reason why everything’s so screwed up over immigration; they refuse to allow assimilation, but they refuse to defend themselves.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 6:49 am Peter the Shark

      Sweden burnt itself out in the 17th century. It was a nice run while it lasted, but the population was simply too small for the crazy empire building the Swedish kings tried to embark on. Between the Thirty Years War and then fighting vicious wars with the Russia of Peter the Great, the attrition rate among the aggressive was probably just too much.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 3:16 pm Arch Hades

      I notice so called “Nordics” also have a propensity for nigger loving too. Only a group of really feminine men would allow millions of foreign males to live among them.

      LikeLike


  2. on February 14, 2013 at 4:00 pm Tyrone

    The lack of fathers in the home accelerate the beta behavior as well.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 4:43 pm Mr. Pointyface

      Wrong. Go work in a prison and see the uniformly fatherless criminals and their fecklessly alpha baby-having-by-17 ways. Sorry the world doesn’t fit your National Socialist agenda.

      It could be that stupid, aggressive people will just dominate out of their willingness to have kids. The world doesn’t owe you intelligent human compatriots. Maybe you’re not so smart yourself, just arrogant and angry.

      Maybe you’re just going to lose, and biologically that means you deserved to lose.

      LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 4:49 pm Anonymous

        Why so butthurt?

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 5:18 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

        Because the pointy part of his face is his nose.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 5:32 pm n/a

        I know exactly who you are. Stop trolling this site.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 7:20 pm J.M.

        Wrong, Pointyface, just a minority of the fatherless drift towards “extreme alphaness”, the rest just go full beta of the spectrum.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 7:46 pm Laconophile

        Fathers can offer discipline to the naturally niggerish, or they can offer a masculinizing influence to natural pussies. The two do not contradict.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 8:56 pm santa666

        Largely depends on race.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 10:36 pm JayMan

        “Wrong. Go work in a prison and see the uniformly fatherless criminals and their fecklessly alpha baby-having-by-17 ways. Sorry the world doesn’t fit your National Socialist agenda.”

        Good point.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:15 pm Tyrone

        I’m neither a national nor an international socialist. That’s your end of the spectrum.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 2:25 am Jason

        I dunno … boys raised with no dad at home are often an intriguing blend of overcompensating superalpha (either wannabe or for real) and soulhurt beta. It’s not either/or.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 6:03 am Tilikum

        riiight. because fatherless homes only affects male children.

        Are you female? Or gay? Ooh, wait….is this Matt? Long on projection, short on rational discourse.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 8:03 am J.M.

        @for males, a male figure in his childhood (aka father) is much more important than for females (after all the archetype of a daughter is her mother not her father). either way most fatherless boys end up being losers anyway either wannabe thugs, or beta herbs that “don’t want to be like their fathers” and adopt feminine behaviour. Very few found balance either in places like this or through sheer luck.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 10:28 am Tilikum

        I don’t disagree a bit, but daddy (or lack thereof) issues also hyper-socialize the girls to crave male attention in…..unique ways. A twofer.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 10:49 am JayMan

        That’s all bullshit.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 8:07 am J.M.

        Are you aware there is a demonstrated correlation between fatherlessness and boys failure rate? That in itself invalidates the implicit bullshit of your post about the non-importance of parenting. Of course, good parenting will not make up for lacking genes, but can improve the odds.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 9:13 am JayMan

        Needless to say, correlation is not causation. In general, as noted in my post, correlations between children and their biological parents aren’t insightful thanks to heredity. (Where do genes come from?)

        In any case, evidence clearly shows that the causality of the bad outcomes associated with fatherlessness is genetic.

        LikeLike


    • on February 19, 2013 at 4:53 pm Tyrone

      I’ve been prevented by my schedule and Wordpest from answering your post on this issue. I agree with you in principle. What is different about Scandinavia and indeed Europe, is the constant and ubiquitous presence of reinforcing ideology to make men betas. I think this will eventually become dystopian as in Haiti or the US ghettos, but the cultural conditioning postpones the day of reckoning a few generations.

      LikeLike


  3. on February 14, 2013 at 4:01 pm robins111

    Its like that in north American too, only one a micro level, cities, once the stomping grounds of blue collar workers, have become nests of pencil necks, and arts majors, trying to find themselves.

    LikeLike


  4. on February 14, 2013 at 4:09 pm Jared

    Sounds like a good fight is coming up. Anybody else have a boner?

    Seriously theyre only getting away with this shit because everyone is trying to look the other way. Europeans are war hungry by nature. In the French revolution they killed 20% of their own population, and need I remind you about the silliness of how WW1 began? Things will pop, as they always do.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 4:13 pm Anonymous

      WW1 was engineered by the british under the influence of a certain tribe, to breakthe power of their continental business rivals. The popular lie of it “just happening”, is just that. A lie.

      LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 4:22 pm lights

        Britain’s two conditions for the cessation of hostilities prior to WWII’s outbreak:
        1. the death of Adolf Hitler
        2. Germany’s return to the international gold standard.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 10:40 pm Thor

        OK, I was writing about WW ONE below. In WWII, the conditions on Germany were simple – get out of Poland. Which they did not. But it was just a matter of time, this is one of hte few cases that I would argue that the British/French declaration of war was pre-emptive. They KNEW they would be next, once Drang Nach Osten had been satisfied

        Thor

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 8:48 am thwack

        In WWII, the conditions on Germany were simple – get out of Poland. Which they did not.
        ———————————————————————

        But you Soviets? you can stay, because you are cool -n- stuff…

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 6:02 pm Thor

        While there were war mongerers on all sides, and the respective populations were promised victory within weeks, before the autumn leaves, Germany largely engineered this. When the Archduke was offed, Germany kept pushing Austria-Hungary to go to war with Serbia, using the fig leaf of an ultimatum that no soverign nation could sign. Once AH went to war on Serbia, Germany claimed they were duty bound by the alliance to help AH.

        And since they were already at war as allies, this enabled Germany to go to war on France with AH as an ally. No, it was not an unlucky accident. Germany was seeking a “Place in the Sun”. Look at a map of 1900 Germany, it was LARGE.

        Thor

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:21 pm Tyrone

        Thor, Britain and France both spent most of the 19th century conspiring together to prevent Germany from becoming a world power and competing directly with them in the race to be the dominant world power. If Germany wanted to assert itself against them, it was justified. Germany never lost in the field during WWI. That was a big reason Right wing factions saw the stab in the back rationale as valid.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 4:39 pm DrEvil007

        The Nazis were leftist; Stalin labeled them as right-wing because fascists and communists were competing over the same people for support at extreme left side of the political spectrum Ever since, useful idiots have referred to the fascists as right wing.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 4:49 pm Lily

        Spot on! Unfortunately, many Nazi sympathizers refuse to acknowledge Hitler being on the left, not the right. Otherwise, how could they justify Hitler’s hared of the Jews who were supposedly on the communist left “trying to make all of Germany communist” according to him?

        The communists and the Nazis are almost identical. The same Godless beliefs, and the same totalitarian control of the individual. They’re two sides of the same coin.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 1:36 am Tyrone

        Factions like Stahlhelm, the Freikorps, etc. were right wing but supported the Nazis.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 7:15 pm Whiskey

        That’s not true, Fashoda in 1898 nearly brought Britain and France to War, under Bismarck the French were isolated to the West (good relations with Britain, Berlin careful not to challenge London’s naval supremacy) and to the East (with the Three Emperor’s League). Bismarck leveled the nation with the KulturKampf, leaving no one to object once he was tossed out by the new Kaiser to a policy of confrontation both in the Balkans and in the West, along with the North Sea. A policy doomed because it took on far too many enemies at once.

        Germany’s army was formidable but had a fatal flaw: almost no logistics, it was not built for an extended war with extended supply lines. In WWII with no real significant fighting the German Army in Greece arrived … starving.

        WWI was the result of the failure of the Concert of Europe to force Germany into lower objectives short of war; and the stupidity of the Kaiser and Junker class taking on too many fights at the same time.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:23 pm n/a

        Thor,

        Is that you in the pic? if so you have a great face.

        To go along with your uniformly excellent posts.

        Just sayin’.–

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 6:57 am Peter the Shark

        Germany didn’t have to push AH. AH actually started the war. This idea is never popular because there aren’t many Hapsburgs around to blame these days, it’s more fun to blame Germans or English. But facts are facts – the Austrians, on their own initiative, made ridiculous demands on Serbia hoping to provoke a little war the Austrians were sure they could win to bolster their staggering Empire. Even the Germans were shocked by how crazy the Austrian demands were. And then the Serbs acquiesced, and the Austrians still kept trying to provoke a war! Germany and Russia were both guilty of getting caught up in war fever and trying to turn the situation to their respective advantages but Austria started it, and bears primary responsiblity for turning what should have been a diplomatic issue into a major war.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 8:10 am J.M.

        @Thor, get your facts straight. WWII was a direct consequence of WWI which by the way was provoked by Austrians stupidity and Brittish intrigue and backstabbing, the latter who competed against Germany in almost all fields (politics, science and economics) and wanted to get rid of an inconvenience to their Empire. Your should read the war mongering articles in England newspapers years before the war, or how the Brittish regarded their German neighbours once they had been unified…as a threat to their empire. Bismark himself didnt want to push much because he feared Brittish intervention in the Continent to “restore equilibrium”, one more reason why the Gross Deutschland” solution was never achieved.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 11:12 am Canadian Friend

        You are all wrong

        George Bush has a time travel machine and he caused WWI and WWII because he was pissed of because ran out of puppies to eat for breakfast

        I blame Bush, because Bush is to blame for everything.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 7:19 pm Whiskey

        The Iron Chancellor argued the Balkans were not worth the bones of a single Prussian Grenadier. The new Kaiser thought differently. Bismarck also restrained Germany from challenging Britain in naval power, arguing that the policy and ambitions in Africa for colonies were a fool’s game. His policy was to keep France isolated, Russia happy, and Britain neutral to an ally. After he was tossed, the new Kaiser aimed to overthrow Britain’s naval superiority which invariably provoked a British reaction. British policy was designed to prevent any nation from dominating Europe, ala Napoleon. And prevent naval challenges from Europe. ANY action by Germany to challenge either objective was guaranteed to provoke hostility because it threatened Britain’s fundamental interests.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 5:17 pm Lily

        Hahaha….All these moves and counter moves by the players is enough to give one a headache. They should have all played a game of Chess and be done with it.

        Can you blame the Founding Fathers warning to steer clear of Europe and its conflicts?

        “Jefferson, commenting in 1823 on the Monroe Doctrine, and the complete political separation of Europe and the Americas, solemnly affirmed: “Our first and fundamental maxim should be, never to entangle ourselves in the broils of Europe; our second, never to suffer Europe to intermeddle with cis-Atlantic affairs.” http://www.inspiredconstitution.org/ppns/chapter_19.html

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 9:51 am peterike

        Anonymous is correct about the tribe. In addition, Germany was willing to end the war in 1916, but certain interests that wanted certain real-estate in Palestine pushed the Brits to not accept a peace settlement and to fight on at all costs. The certain wealthy interests agreed to broker the U.S. into the war in exchange for that parcel of land from the British. So the fighting went on, and millions more died. In addition, in 1918 the final German offensive showed every sign of breaking through and winning for good, when massive strikes were started in Germany by certain labor groups controlled by certain Communists. This prevented supplies from reaching the front, stalling the German advance, and ultimately leading to their surrender.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 2:57 pm Lily

        “but certain interests that wanted certain real-estate in Palestine pushed the Brits to not accept a peace settlement and to fight on at all costs.”

        Study history, idiot. That piece of land was coveted by the British for centuries, as it has been coveted by almost all Europeans since the Crusades. The Ottoman Empire was crumbling and it was the best time for the British Empire to strike. The Brits weren’t doing anything for the tribe. Everyone hated the tribe. The hatred for them was on an all-time high back then, just a couple of decades away from a plan devised to annihilate them.

        “certain wealthy interests agreed to broker the U.S. into the war in exchange for that parcel of land from the British.”

        That’s an even more fantastic claim. The US had no interest in anything to do with that parcel of land. “Speak softly and carry a big stick” was the policy back then. We were isolationist, forgot?

        Do you really like to believe this conspiracy theory garbage? I knew one of you losers would bring in the tribe as the reason for this war or that war. Just accept the fact that Germany is a war mongering place, and all Germanic nation are warmongers to a point; hardly a peaceful bunch. All it takes is one warmonger to incite them and they are set ablaze. Kind of reminds me of other inferior races getting all emboldened by warmongering imams to burn the flag of the infidel, ransack his embassies, and kill whomever falls to their hands. Too bad you don’t recognize yourself in that behavior, dummy.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 7:40 pm J.M.

        Your ignorance of history shows woman… German people warmongers? More like British and Americans if you consider how many wars have these people participated in the last two centuries.

        By the way the participation of the U.S. in the war WAS THROUGH A CONSPIRACY and I am not the one saying it, the history as it is updated just confirms what many have stated for years…Lusitania was a trap to justify America going to war. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1098904/Secret-Lusitania-Arms-challenges-Allied-claims-solely-passenger-ship.html?ITO=1490#

        Heck, the revolution of the US and subsequent independence WAS A CONSPIRACY and technically treason of the highest order. Just because Washington and the rest of the gang were on the victors side, explains them escaping capital punishment. And about the “hated tribe”? Yikes, the “hated tribe” is one of the most pampered peoples of Earth, just below women in the pampering level displayed by the media.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 5:50 pm Lily

        “Your ignorance of history shows woman”

        LOL!!!!! And your twisting of history shows your dabble in conspiracy lore.

        Yeah, Germans are warmongers. Why do you refuse to acknowledge it? Who ransacked Rome? The Germanic tribes. From where do we get the term to vandalize? From the Germanic vandals’ destruction of everything in their path. From where do we get the word berserk? From the berserkers. Such wonderful terms of warmongering form the Germanic tribes, eh? Their reputation was not misplaced.

        Even the Founding Fathers acknowledged Europe’s warmongering:

        “The international gospel of the Founding Fathers was forecast by Jefferson in 1793. It was voiced by Washington in his Farewell Address in 1796, when he declared we should have “as little political connection as possible with Europe,” because Europe had a ‘°set of primary interests” with which we had “none or a very remote relation,” wherefore “must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concern; . . . why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice? It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world.” The Monroe Doctrine declaring against the future colonization of the American continent by Europeans, against the extension therein of their political system, against interposition by European powers to control the destinies of the Latin Americas, implemented the principles of the Address. And Jefferson, commenting in 1823 on the Monroe Doctrine, and the complete political separation of Europe and the Americas, solemnly affirmed: “Our first and fundamental maxim should be, never to entangle ourselves in the broils of Europe; our second, never to suffer Europe to intermeddle with cis-Atlantic affairs.” http://www.inspiredconstitution.org/ppns/chapter_19.html

        “More like British and Americans if you consider how many wars have these people participated in the last two centuries.”

        What? First, America was mostly isolationists, so most wars were thrust upon us, and that includes 9/11 and the subsequent wars that followed.

        The British are a bit different, but in any confrontation with Germany, Germany started it first.

        Regarding the Lusitania, we’ll see when the evidence is excavated. It’s just a hunch as of now, and I’m not ready to indict the British.

        “Heck, the revolution of the US and subsequent independence WAS A CONSPIRACY and technically treason of the highest order. Just because Washington and the rest of the gang were on the victors side, explains them escaping capital punishment.”

        From a person who likes to twist the truth to prove your agenda, of course you’re going to call the American revolution a conspiracy. LOL! There was nothing conspiratorial about it. Nobody hid anything. We told the British flat out “no taxation without representation,” and we said we want to remove the yoke of England from the colonies. Where is the conspiracy? Once hostilities began, the British eventually retreated to Canada with minimal bloodshed compared to the French Revolution, which was just an excuse for bloodthirsty types to seize power and take assets from the rich. The fact The War of Independence wasn’t as bloody as every European war speaks volumes about the goodness of this land and its people. 🙂

        “And about the “hated tribe”? Yikes, the “hated tribe” is one of the most pampered peoples of Earth, just below women in the pampering level displayed by the media.”

        – Really? Is that why the tribe was nearly annihilated 60 years ago?

        – And is that why the UN is constantly trying to pass resolutions against the tribe, with only the US vetoing? With all the problems facing the planet, from famine to military conflicts, you’d think the UN would be busy at work finding solutions to these problems, yet the UN is busy trying to find ways to destroy the tribe. So far, no one has succeeded. I’m sure it’s infuriating the tribe’s haters. I just get amused at their stupidity. They’re in a long line of would be destroyers.

        – And don’t tell me, you think the media is controlled by the tribe, and that’s why it’s favorable to said tribe, right? WRONG!!!!

        – Is that why in the media this tribe gets trashed nonstop? Is that why the New York Beta Times, Newsweek, Times, Associated Press, Reuters, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, CBC, BBC, and every news organization in the world etc….constantly call the tribe killers of Palestinians and take the Palestinians side in all conflicts when the Palestinians are clearly the aggressors? I think you got it wrong. After women, the most protected people are the Palestinians; they can never do wrong as long as they are “fighting” the tribe. Wait, when the Arabs finish off the tribe, they’ll turn their focus on the West. And who we have to thank? Tribe haters and their supporters. But I’ll be laughing at the stupidity of conspiracy theorists extraordinaire like yourself.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2013 at 11:57 pm Thor

        Come now, J.M. It is not original to point out that if you win, you are a hereo, If you lose, you are a traitor or equivalent. But the wa of American Independence differed from many others in that those in the nascnt US who had been on the losing side were merely invited to leave, unlike similar situations where the losers were killed.

        Thor

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2013 at 11:14 pm Difference Maker

        Certain individuals of certain background had not long before overruled a sitting President’s wishes regarding a trade treaty with Russia, and certain bankers were to make Henry Ford very angry and write some angry words a few years down the line, so you see, this was already that kind of country back then

        And it’s no secret about the instability of the communists back then, the nature of their leaders, the control of the newspapers, the theater, the banks

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 7:24 pm Whiskey

        Not true, by 1916 ALL combatants due to horrific losses escalated War Aims: Britain, France demanded near total German disarmament and reparations, Germany demanded the low countries and most of Northern France, British naval disarmament.

        The Ludendorff offensive failed, because Germany lacked the supplies, and men, to exploit gains. The French/British with American reinforcements had “defense in depth” i.e. MILES of trenches, deep. Take a few miles, and you still face maybe twenty more. No tanks, nothing to break through the defenses, made the fight like Okinawa or Iwo Jima except even mostly. [Strikes were quickly suppressed, and a sign like the French Mutiny in 1916 that people had enough of the slaughter. This just in, people don’t like their sons, brothers, fathers, uncles, cousins, being slaughtered for … nothing. A few miles of trenches.]

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 5:18 am bob

      “Europeans are war hungry by nature. In the French revolution they killed 20% of their own population,”

      What kind of bullshit is that lol? The French Revolution was mainly a bourgeois thing happening in Paris. The rest of the country, a huge majority of them being peasants, didn’t give a fuck and went on with their life.There was some people killed, but 20% of the population? lol, more like 1%. 🙂

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 3:00 pm Lily

        Jared is right; it’s not bullshit. By comparison to the American revolution it was bloody and evil. We hardly shed any blood in ours. We asked the Brits to go north to Canada, which they did, and that as the end of it.

        Some of you have been raised on conspiracy theory galore, not to mention revisionist history. Time to review the facts for some of you.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 3:31 pm Anonymous

        The French Revolution and the subsequent Reign of Terror, etc. was traumatically and dramatically bloody, and this was not confined only to lopping the heads off aristocrats. Jared and Lily are correct – try reading some real history, not what our “teachers” “teach” you. 20% seems high, but not beyond the realm of possibility.

        Didn’t you see Les Mis? Hahah….

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 3:29 pm Greg Eliot

        I had always heard that some 69K heads rolled off the guillotines during the so-called French Revolution.

        That ain’t no 20%.

        If I’ve been misinformed, I’d appreciate the true and factual-not-just-someone’s-blog figures.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 3:34 pm Greg Eliot

        Note that I don’t think including the wars of Napoleon or other conflicts not related to the actual Reign of Terror (which is what most people actually mean when they talk of the “French Revolution”) should be counted towards the death toll of the actual revolution.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 4:48 pm Anonymous

        Well then, which one? France has had like four of them since the first one.

        The French Revolution(s) are typically bloody, and typically end in a reversion to tyranny (Napoleon, de Gaulle, etc.).

        Anyone that tells me France is a free country is not a very serious person.

        Ain’t “Liberté, Fraternité, Egalité” great?

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 6:22 pm Lily

        Another great book is Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France. Just reading the reviews in this amazon link is worth the price of admission. People reviewing these kinds of books are very knowledgeable about history.

        “Published in 1790, two years before the start of the Terror, this work offered a remarkably prescient view of the chaos that lay ahead. A classic of political science and a cornerstone of modern conservative thought, it articulates a defense of property, religion, and traditional values that resonates with modern readers.”

        http://www.amazon.com/Reflections-Revolution-France-Dover-Editions/dp/0486445070/ref=cm_cr_dp_asin_lnk

        This book will draw a strong contrast between French thinking that created mob rule, and classic American thought, which created the greatest nation on earth employing the most compassionate human principles. Europe and European thinking doesn’t even come close to an orderly peaceful government. They have the EU for now, but not for long. Eventfully, Europe will find itself in yet another world conflict. I just hope we could avert our involvement.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 6:24 pm Lily

        Well said!

        And who do they have now? A totalitarian flaming liberal who is making the rich pay 90% tax. Only in Viva la France! History often repeats itself.
        _________________________________________________________

        For those who don’t know much about said Revolution, a good book to read on it which ties it all to us today in the West, especially the USA, is Ann Coulter’s Demonic: How the Liberal Mob Is Endangering America.

        http://www.amazon.com/Demonic-How-Liberal-Endangering-America/dp/0307353494

        “The demon is a mob, and the mob is demonic. The Democratic Party activates mobs, depends on mobs, coddles mobs, publicizes and celebrates mobs—it is the mob. Sweeping in its scope and relentless in its argument, Demonic explains the peculiarities of liberals as standard groupthink behavior. To understand mobs is to understand liberals.

        In her most provocative book to date, Ann Coulter argues that liberals exhibit all the psychological characteristics of a mob, for instance:

        Liberal Groupthink: “The same mob mentality that leads otherwise law-abiding people to hurl rocks at cops also leads otherwise intelligent people to refuse to believe anything they haven’t heard on NPR.”

        Liberal Schemes: “No matter how mad the plan is—Fraternité, the ‘New Soviet Man,’ the Master Race, the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, Building a New Society, ObamaCare—a mob will believe it.”

        Liberal Enemies: “Instead of ‘counterrevolutionaries,’ liberals’ opponents are called ‘haters,’ ‘those who seek to divide us,’ ‘tea baggers,’ and ‘right-wing hate groups.’ Meanwhile, conservatives call liberals ‘liberals’—and that makes them testy.”

        Liberal Justice: “In the world of the liberal, as in the world of Robespierre, there are no crimes, only criminals.”

        Liberal Violence: “If Charles Manson’s followers hadn’t killed Roman Polanski’s wife, Sharon Tate, Clinton would have pardoned him, too, and he’d probably be teaching at Northwestern University.”

        Citing the father of mob psychology, Gustave Le Bon, Coulter catalogs the Left’s mob behaviors: the creation of messiahs, the fear of scientific innovation, the mythmaking, the preference for images over words, the lack of morals, and the casual embrace of contradictory ideas.

        Coulter traces the history of the liberal mob to the French Revolution and Robespierre’s revolutionaries (delineating a clear distinction from America’s founding fathers), who simply proclaimed that they were exercising the “general will” before slaughtering their fellow citizens “for the good of mankind.”

        Similarly, as Coulter demonstrates, liberal mobs, from student radicals to white-trash racists to anti-war and pro-ObamaCare fanatics today, have consistently used violence to implement their idea of the “general will.”

        This is not the American tradition; it is the tradition of Stalin, of Hitler, of the guillotine—and the tradition of the American Left.

        As the heirs of the French Revolution, Democrats have a history that consists of pandering to mobs, time and again, while Republicans, heirs to the American Revolution, have regularly stood for peaceable order.

        Hoping to muddy this horrifying truth, liberals slanderously accuse conservatives of their own crimes—assassination plots, conspiracy theorizing, political violence, embrace of the Ku Klux Klan. Coulter shows that the truth is the opposite: Political violence—mob violence—is always a Democratic affair.

        Surveying two centuries of mob movements, Coulter demonstrates that the mob is always destructive. And yet, she argues, beginning with the civil rights movement in the sixties, Americans have lost their natural, inherited aversion to mobs. Indeed, most Americans have no idea what they are even dealing with.

        Only by recognizing the mobs and their demonic nature can America begin to defend itself.”

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2013 at 11:49 pm Anonymous

        The modern French political milieu is comprised of a very small group of landed gentry swapping the reigns of power between themselves.

        Fer Chrissakes, the gal who Sarkozy competed against was/is named Ségolène Royal. She rose to prominence due to Mitterand’s patronage. France’s current leader, François Hollande is close with Madame Royal, since he used to be married to her. The two of them went to school with Villepin, who was PM under Chirac. It’s a pretty tight-knit oligarchy over there. I guess that’s what they meant by “Fraternité”.

        France is a joke.

        P.S., Lily, Mr. Burke is excellent. “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” Oh, and please remember. “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme.” – Mark Twain.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 11:29 pm Iain Johnston

        There was also the massacre by the French revolutionary government of more than a hundred thousand Catholic peasants during the Vendée rebellion of the mid- 1790s, which is too often forgotten… there were terrible atrocities committed against the clergy and laity in the name of enforced secularism. Still not 20%, but pretty bad, and a precursor to the secularist genocides of the 20th century.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 12:01 am Anonymous

        The Roman Catholic Church was, and is, a competitor to Nation-State governments. It is a threat to their sovereignty, and twas ever thus.

        With that said, the French and the Vatican have been pretty close, over the years. Certainly closer than the English or the Norsemen. 🙂

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 11:05 am thwack

        Only by recognizing the mobs and their demonic nature can America begin to defend itself.”
        ——————————–

        If you listen to fools, the mob rules

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 4:44 pm Lily

        “and a precursor to the secularist genocides of the 20th century.”

        BINGO!!!!

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 1:38 pm Anonymous

        Thwack, excellent Black Sabbath reference. Kudos.

        LikeLike


  5. on February 14, 2013 at 4:09 pm Anonymous

    The vikings were indeed the guys who left. They settled in the british isles in the west and across the russian steppe to the east. Their descendants founded the british and russian empires and eventually the united states as well. Before a certain tribe gained power in these places , there was no ridiculous feminism to be found.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 5:26 pm Anon

      Yes, the ones with the rep for pillaging, raping, and war-mongering were the younger sons forced out of their homeland due an explosion in population and not enough farmable land for them. The ones who stayed behind were the eldest sobs who inherited the land and got rich and soft.

      Interestingly, the East Asian countries, generally thought to have lots of beta males, are the ones most successfully keeping the trash out.

      LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 5:31 pm Mr. Pointyface

      Anonymous: So you’re complaining the Jews are smarter than you, and win all the time? If you’ re too dumb or lazy to compete, maybe you want to go around the rule of law and resort to mass murder or genocide, and then you have a dumb-as-rocks country like Urkaine?

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 3:14 pm Lily

        It’s always the tribe, don’t you know? The tribe is either smarter than everyone else and running the show everywhere, or it’s corrupting with feminism and communism. These losers would say anything but take responsibility for their own loser behavior, deeds, and mistakes (very much like the Beloved Führer). When peep start taking responsibility for their actions as opposed to blaming some imaginary tribe, it’s when the West will begin to flourish again. Until then, we have losers on the Left and losers on the Right, and the show goes on in loserville.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 12:28 am Phil

        “dumb-as-rocks country like Urkaine”

        Anti-slavic racism from the philo-semite.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 11:44 am Greg Eliot

        Just the usual suspect cognitive dissonance.

        Of course pointyphiz is a philo-semite… as his fellow tribesman once said: “Don’t knock masturbation… it’s sex with someone I love.”

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 5:59 pm Lily

        Maybe he likes to stick it to the tribe haters who constantly blame the tribe for the Ukraine massacre. Bullshit. Blame it on Stalin.

        And I see fucking Greg is back to his old tricks; can’t stay away from a war he can’t win, eh?

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 4:36 pm Tyrone

        Lilly, 70% of the Checkists and about 80% of the 20 and 30s era Politburo were Jews. Collectivization was their idea too, not Uncle Joe’s alone, an idea they enthusiastically carried out. Communism was and remains a Jewish movement first and foremost. Until you accept that responsibility, you’re arguments remain empty. To the Ukrainians who lost their land and familiy members, the holocaust was payback for the Holodomor.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 6:24 pm Lily

        To the Ukrainians who lost their land and familiy members, the holo_ was payback for the Holodomor.”

        If it makes you feel better thinking like this and you think it absolves you, continue lying to yourself. However, it will back fire. All the hate you hurl at the jooz is not going to set you free. It will do to you what Uncle Adolf did to Deutschland.

        Holodomor is not a massacre conducted by jooz. It was the direct policy of Stalin. I realize in n-NZ website they keep advancing this idea, but it doesn’t make it true.

        You think that because Marx was a Joo, then it makes all jooz communists, and they were the only ones involved in the Bolsheviks revolution. That’s just anti-joo rhetoric. Some secular joos were involved with the Bolshevik revolution , no question about it. But you exaggerate their influence greatly because you read justification for genocide in n-NZ websites. No respected historian says the stuff you hurl unless he has n-NZ leanings. That’s why you are not to be taken seriously.

        “Until you accept that responsibility, you’re arguments remain empty.”

        My argument is not empty; it’s true. However because you have an ax to grind, you see only the joo as the source of communism, not white Russians who wanted to overthrow the Tsar. Your arguments are empty and devoid of facts.

        But all of this was said already by the Führer himself. Nothing you blame the jooz for is original. History heard it all already from another hater.

        LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 10:38 pm JayMan

      And yet, the descendants of the English Vikings were the Puritans, who became today’s SWPLs…

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 5:03 am Thor

      Yup, it’s is a picture of me. Thanks for the kind words.

      Thor

      LikeLike


  6. on February 14, 2013 at 4:14 pm askjoe

    I blame emigration, all the cool people left Europe a century ago to make America (until Ted Kennedy spoiled to batch), leaving Europe as the hotbed of totalitarian mindsets and other assholes. I wonder about the “quality” of the invading hordes though. They’re probably considered trash from whence they come, but thanks to meekness enforced by the totalitarian mindset (we mustn’t do anything to offend incoming hordes, turns into another boot on the neck), they’ve gone full loco with their newfound power and anarchy.

    Back home, the house of saud would have these guys eviscerated, eh?

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 5:16 pm july

      Keep telling yourself that. Going to complain about them taking your jerbs too? Funny because these invading hordes you refer are to are the ones reviewing your cholesterol levels.

      LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 6:07 pm askjoe

        Right, like Bilal Abdullah?

        Euroweenie Socialism:

        1. Make being a doctor financial suicide.
        2. Import tons of Muslims to work as cheap doctors.
        3. Boom
        4. Profit. And by profit, we mean steady decline.

        Always a good read:

        Aneurin Bevan, the socialist who created the National Health Service after World War II, was once asked to explain how he’d talked the country’s doctors into agreeing to become state employees: “I stuffed their mouths with gold,” he crowed. Sixty years later, no amount of gold can persuade Britons to spend their working lives in the country’s dirty, decrepit hospitals (they spend enough of their nonworking lives there, waiting to be seen, waiting for beds, waiting for operations). According to a report in the British Medical Journal, white males comprise 43.5 percent of the population but now account for less than a quarter of students at UK medical schools. In other words, being a doctor is no longer an attractive middle-class career proposition. That’s quite a monument to six decades of Michael Moore-style socialist health care.
        So today the NHS is hungry for medical personnel from almost anywhere on the planet, so hungry that the government set up special fast-track immigration programs: Mohammed Asha, Mohammed Haneef and their comrades didn’t even require a work permit to come and practice as doctors in state hospitals. You don’t have to be the smartest jihadist in the cave to see that as an opportunity, any more than it required no great expertise for the 9/11 killers to figure that the quickest place to get the picture IDs with which they boarded the planes was through Virginia’s “undocumented worker” network. Everyone else from the Venezuelan peasantry to the Russia mafia knows the vulnerabilities of Western immigration systems, so why not the jihadists?

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 2:41 pm Anonymous

        OK, I just made a “stuffed their mouths with gold” post not 30 minutes ago here on this site, so either you read my link, or you already knew this. If it’s the former, great-and-thank-you, if it’s the latter, fantastic and good to have an ally. Onwards together, soldier. “Forward!”

        Having experienced the NHS personally for many years, I can tell you that the US has no idea what havoc it has released upon itself by instituting “0bamacare”, aka “The Affordable Care Act”, which is, per Leftist linguistic doctrine, neither Affordable nor Caring.

        As “Gramps” noted the other day, “My kids voted for 0bama. They will live their choices.” Yep. But unfortunately, so will I. Where can I go to get a waiver? I might need to join the Teamsters for that.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 6:10 pm askjoe

        Go ahead, be snide, let’s see what else these invading hordes are doing:
        http://muslimrapewave.wordpress.com/2012/07/06/another-brutal-muslim-gang-rape-in-sweden/

        And fucking assholes who make that point are the same ones to bemoan outsourcing or walk in slut walks.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 6:27 pm quasi

        Nope, different hordes. The medics, scientists and mathematicians are more likely to be Indian (dot, not casino) and probably higher caste Hindu, not an overtly hostile minority group, typically (events of 1857 notwithstanding).

        The muslim hordes from shitholes such as Pakistan, Bangladesh and – God help us – Somalia are a different kettle of jihad. They aren’t taking anyone’s jerbs, that’s half the fucking problem.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 3:59 pm Lily

        That’s true; there is a difference between the educated Indian who has some British/western mentality being that Britain was ruling there less than a century ago, and the gang from “Pakistan, Bangladesh and – God help us – Somalia .“

        That said, any 3rd worlder has a tendency to lower standards. Sorry, but I rather go to my white health care provider than any 3rd worlder anyway.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 7:48 pm Laconophile

        You should have them check your testosterone levels.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 9:00 pm santa666

        H1bs make up a miniscule fraction of immigrants. You must live in a sheltered white conclave in the northeast, if you think most immigrants are like your nice Indian doctor.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 9:14 pm Ben

        You wont be so snarky when your mother and sister are being fucked in the arse by a gang of muzzie rapist screaming: “ALLAH WAGBAR, RAPE IS GOOD!”

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 2:43 pm askjoe

        So, then one day, America decided to import millions of Somali Muslims?
        http://www.minnpost.com/glean/2013/02/long-simmering-tension-south-high-leads-all-out-brawl

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 4:02 pm Lily

        Disgusting! Liberals are bringing these savages into our country in order to weaken our whiteness. Liberals are doing the same thing in almost every western country, even in Israel.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 3:46 pm Lily

        They are overrunning hospitals in every major city, that is doctors from Pakistan and India. The nurses are either Haitian, or also Pakistani and Indian. The quality of health care has diminished greatly. Same thing in every western country. Doctors don’t want to become government employees. In the USA, white doctors work in a hospital environment for a few years and then open their own practices. Those 3rd wolrders remain for years in the hospitals because they know most people wouldn’t go to see them in private practice when they can go to a white doctor. In a hospital environment patients can’t choose the doctors so they hold us hostage. so indeed, i would call them invading hordes, and I wish they weren’t importing them.

        LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 6:03 pm Tartarus

      Yeah bro “totalitarians” are the ones who bend over backwards to appease foreigners. Retard.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 12:02 pm askjoe

        No, you the retard. they changed the demographics of a nation to ensure a permanent voting bloc. It’s kinda funny, make soul crushing diversity laws to make even objecting to changing demographics illegal while letting the diversity run wild.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 4:07 pm Lily

        “they changed the demographics of a nation to ensure a permanent voting bloc.”

        Exactly; they’re weakening our whiteness so that it’s not a white nation anymore and they have a de facto government forever.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 9:00 pm Anonymous

        All they have to do now is flip Texas, and that’s it… it will be all over (from a POTUS standpoint).

        And don’t think the Left hasn’t noticed this. It’s on like Donkey Kong in Texas – the Left is using the schools to steal the souls of the children there and make them love The Combine.

        Why, little Johnny, won’t you please show us what sort of Socialist Flag you’ve made for the class?

        http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/01/31/4591624/senators-question-creators-of.html

        Good boy. One day you will grow up to become part of The Combine. Now eat your Soylent Green.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 4:36 pm Lily

        So true! Best comment of the thread in terms of opening people’s eyes. I’ve been saying it for months now. I have noticed the Left doing all in its power to shift the demographics in certain key Red-States, specifically TX. This started especially after Katrina when throngs of blacks moved to TX. Then you have all the lefties from CA who don’t want to pay CA taxes move there. And finally, liberal activists moving to shift demographics. Liberal activists have been doing the same thing in UT, AZ, and OK. It’s only a matter of time. Some say before the end of the decade TX will turn liberal. The only way we could fight this trend in key states is through education, but the conservatives there leave it in the hands of the liberals. For the money, conservatives in these red states are willing to sell their soul to the devil. The Federal Government and the Dept. of Education who tend to be liberal wouldn’t support the states with billions of dollars if they don’t follow lefty government gelidness on education. It’s too bad no one has the fortitude to forgo federal dollars in some of these Red States and take education under the states’ wing, which tend to be more conservative.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2013 at 2:27 pm santa666

        The only way to fight what’s happening in Texas is the way they did it when they created Texas.

        Anything else is foolishness. Politics and propaganda is how you destroy a nation, not how you create one. Their tactics cannot be used to create, that knife only cuts one way. Look at history.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 1:53 pm Anonymous

        Lily… tsk tsk. You are holding promise, but this was a miss.

        Do not use the Left’s words for you. They have stuffed your mouth with gold* and words. Cease and desist from using “Red State” and “Blue State”, for two reasons:

        1. The author of the “Red/Blue State” dichotomy was a journo, and a Leftist (but I repeat myself). Well now, a Leftist ain’t exactly going to tell you the truth, now is he? And so, Red, the color of Communism, was attributed to conservatives/Classic Liberals, and Blue was given to the Communism. You see, Communism must be on the march in secret here in these United States, and his appellations provided a nice camouflage, which is why other journos use these appellations. Even some of their enemies use the same terminology (www.redstate.com) … capture theory.
        2. If you look at an actual map of voting in the US, you will quickly see that it is only the urban areas that lean Leftist. And here many can pile in and say that this is due to blacks, Jooz, whatever, and I am not going to say they are wrong, per se… only that correlation does not mean causation. “It’s complicated”. Our Electoral College + gerrymandering enables them to hold hostage their States, and the 17th Amendment exacerbates their effect on politics. I would preserve the Electoral College, get smarter about fighting gerrymandering, and throw out the 17th Amendment.

        * http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/the-birth-of-the-nhs-856091.html

        P.S. Sorry I cannot post as anything but “Anonymous”. My life’s work dictates that I do so. Let’s do this. I’ll sign my posts, thusly: ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 2:11 pm Anonymous

        Are these the “they” you’re talking about Lilly. Oh, sorry cant mention the “tribe”, they’re innocent.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 2:12 pm Anonymous

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 3:19 pm Anonymous

        From a purely demographic perspective, the woman in this video is not wrong. It is perhaps a testament to how fvcked Sweden is that it will allow an obvious cultural Marxist to infiltrate its country and foment dissent inside its own borders. But hey, that’s just par for the course if your are a Leftist (aka “fuzzy thinker”). So, any reaction against foreign/cultural invasion = racism, and any pride/promulgation of Swedish culture as something to be regaled/followed/respected = racism. Yep… that’s the standard plan for the Left… make you a criminal in your own skin, and especially if you believe in anything whatsoever, other than The Combine.

        Most Socialist countries are not capable of replacement rates that guarantee their future, and Sweden is no exception (nay, it is instead an excellent example of a warning for those who wish to follow the Road to Serfdom). Abandon all hope, ye who wish to follow this path. Unfortunately, all of Europe including Russia is so far down this path they cannot recover, and the US/Canada are also quietly too far down this path to recover.

        Enjoy poolside, gentlemen. Tune up your fiddles.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 3:44 pm Lily

        I see what you’re saying, and thank you for posting this. This woman is highly misguided and highly secular, and she thinks she is helping, whether it’s Israel, Europe, or Sweden. She isn’t. She is making things worse. Secular tribe-members are very misguided, unfortunately! She is also the type that if you tell her she is wrong, she will never acknowledge it. The way she talks, she sounds like she has no doubt she is right. Another lefty idiot.

        That said, her behavior is a direct reaction to Islam. Let me explain. In Sweden for instance (and many other places in Europe), they allowed many Muslims to immigrate, and these Muslims are influencing Swedish citizens against Israel, not to mention destroying Swedish society, but I digress. There is lots of hate towards the tribe coming mostly form Muslims, not Swedes. Really, the Swedes aren’t that anti-tribe, or racist in general. They’re very decent people. However, the Muslims are changing the Swedes’ attitude towards Israel, and tribe members are fearful. You would too, if you were in that situation. Pay attention to the beginning of that clip. It talks about the anti-tribe situation developing in Sweden in recent years.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 3:50 pm Lily

        Let me continue. It seems long posts are going to moderation.

        Some Swedes are being influenced against Israel, especially the young in universities. That makes the tribe fearful of standing alone once again in the world and having another genocide directed at them. That’s why you have people like her thinking they’re helping by bringing “dialogue and understanding” between people, or multiculturalism. In other words, lefty values.

        I wish more traditional tribe-members would tell her to butt out. She needs to worry about Israel, not Europe. The tribe has Israel now, so another genocide isn’t likely. The best way to help her cause isn’t multiculturalism, but ousting all foreigners Yet, the bureaucrats in Sweden are all liberals and they like her message of multiculturalism, and they’re helping her. They’re making it possible for her to push this agenda. So you can’t blame just her or tribe members. If the government didn’t like it, it would have put a stop to it. Pay attention to the middle of the clip, it says she is doing this with the help of the Swedish government.

        Secular tribe members are horrible in meddling in other people’s business. They have an old religious law that tells them never to interfere in other nations’ political affairs. Religious tribe-members still stick to it, and some don’t even vote. Their secular members shame them over not caring for their country, but they reply that while they love their country they are guests and don’t want to interfere in its affair. Too bad most secular tribe members eschew this old religious law. There was a reason their rabbis instituted this law. They knew anti-tribe haters would use anything as an excuse for a pogrom, or some other anti-tribe edict.

        @ Anonymous ending in ∞, ITAWY. Your dissection of the situation is spot on.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 3:53 pm Anonymous

        There are a lot of “Anonymous” here, so your post is understandable. I didn’t post the first two in this sub-thread, but did post the last one.

        Like Jimmy’s friend, I have a lot of Jewish friends.

        Some of these MoT would be folks I would welcome into in proverbial bunker. Indeed, most Israelis understand the real threats and eschew stupidity and embrace self-determination, logic, sane money, etc. American Jews are another matter, in general.

        Further, I don’t think it’s accurate to state that the MoT are “innocent”, whatever that means. The MoT will act to preserve the Tribe. You should do the same, DUMMY. If you are not acting to preserve your Tribe, well, you aren’t very useful, are you?

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 3:59 pm Anonymous

        Our primary goal for Western Europe at this time should be to remove all nuclear warheads from the region.

        Because the demographics are that Europe will become part of Caliphate 2.0, and I don’t see anything that is going to stop that. So the best we can do is to prevent Europistan from having the reach it will need (nukes) to make Murika (and Canada can come too) part of the dar al Islam.

        Doing anything else in Europe is angels dancing on a pin. Nothing matters – Europe will be dar al Islam, by their own hand. Embrace it. Deal with it. It’s already done.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 4:40 pm Lily

        The woman in that video is so clueless, she can’t see that it’s multiculturalism in Europe that’s posing the most danger to Israel, as well as for the indigenous people of Europe. Multiculturalism means more Islam in Europe, and another enemy of Israel. In the 1960s, 1970s, and even 1980s, Israel enjoyed lots of support from Europe. That started charging as soon as Muslims began immigrating to Europe. By deduction alone (you don’t have to be a genius), that should mean that Islam and subsequent multiculturalism is what made the tide turn against Israel. Some of these lefty tribe members are complete “fuzzy thinkers,” as you say.
        ___________________________________________________________

        When do you think this Caliphate 2.0 will become a reality, another decade, two, or more?

        Do you really think Europe will become Islamic? Don’t you think that eventually the population would rise up and there will be WWIII to push the invaders out of Europe?

        Haha…Murika, eh? I heard them calling it Ammrika, but you’re close enough. It’s funny, if not so fucked up.

        “Europe will be dar al Islam, by their own hand”

        Or dar al-harb, if Islam has to fight to bring the Caliphate. You should explain to the Islam-lovers lefty-thinkers here what this means. It’s scary shit.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 5:22 pm Anonymous

        Lily, you misunderstand the terms.

        Murika, and indeed anything that is not in the dar al Islam, IS the dar al harb. There are only two types of “dar” (land). You have either submitted (the meaning of “Islam”) or you live in the Land of War.

        So, you already live in the Land of War. Recognize.

        Armor up. I recommend you learn to run a shotgun and a pistol, at the minimum. God made man. Sam Colt made them equal. For a woman, Krav Maga is recommended. Read “On Killing”, “To Ride Shoot Straight and Speak the Truth”, “In The Gravest Extreme” and “Stressfire”. Get hard.

        And yes, there will indeed be a backlash in Europe, as the Europeans are mightily xenophobic, gawblessim. But it will be tempered by Cultural Marxists cowing the populace(s) with Political Correctness and with the immigration they already have had, and will be labeled NAZIism when it arrives (in an attempt to prevent indigenous peoples from joining up – shaming language is an expertise of the Left).

        I estimate this backlash will happen when the hashish runs out in Spain.

        But most Euroweenies couldn’t hump a ruck up a single hill, let alone march with a full load-out and take lives as necessary. They don’t have the conditioning for it, physical or mental. And so they won’t be a big concern, and will fall to The Combine.

        Soylent Green (even if Islamic Green) is people.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 6:10 pm Anonymous

        Another one for you all: ” Just bend over and die white men. ”

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 7:39 pm Anonymous

        I’ve met Jesse Jackson, and he has the dead eyes of an evil person, which match perfectly with every.damn.thing.he’s.ever.done.

        I just wish he wore the blood-stained shirt every day. Because, really, that is who he is as a person. If you don’t know what I am talking about, reading is fundamental. Try it.

        I look forward to the day when there is no longer be a Jesse Jackson, and am super-stoked that his son is a fvck up who snorts bath salts or whatever he duzz. Next.

        Jesse does MLK a great disservice in every way. And that’s a statement, given that MLK was no angel.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 8:41 pm Lily

        “Lily, you misunderstand the terms.

        Murika, and indeed anything that is not in the dar al Islam, IS the dar al harb. There are only two types of “dar” (land). You have either submitted (the meaning of “Islam”) or you live in the Land of War.

        So, you already live in the Land of War. Recognize.”

        Got it!

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 8:57 pm Anonymous

        My “teachable moment” for the day, as resident Infidel.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 9:09 pm Anonymous

        “Got it.”

        OK, now what are you going to do about it?

        Educating erstwhile/ersatz “PUAs” will get you somewhere, but not far. Meanwhile… how secure is your “perimeter” (meaning the up-close-and-personal means of your safety)? Learn the skills that will keep you safe, and find the people that are of like mind, and stick with them. Cuz it’s ’bout to get crazay up in here.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 9:18 pm Lily

        I think you’re right. I think 2013 is going to be bad, and it’s going to get worse from there on.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 9:32 pm Anonymous

        Yep. I have made my preparations. I hope years from now we can look back on all of this and larf. Right now, I am checking my windage and elevation to make sure it has not drifted (both figuratively and literally), and staying vigilant.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 9:51 pm Lily

        Obama wants to destroy the USA. He is going to give amnesty to millions of illegals and open the borders to Muslim immigration and others haters.

        Why do we think he wants to take all guns away so badly? Never in history was a president so obsessed with gun removal.

        This man is the end of America, as we know it, and the end of the West by extension. If America goes, it will have a domino effect on the rest of the west.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 9:55 pm Anonymous

        We shall see.

        Hopefully, we WON’T SEE, and can instead live normal lives.

        Otherwise, it’s going to get drastic up in here.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 10:12 pm Lily

        @ Anonymous

        The Chief Rabbi of England Lord Sachs writing a scathing attack against multiculturalism.

        http://isteve.blogspot.com/2007/10/britains-top-rabbi-warns-against.html

        “Sacks: Multiculturalism threatens democracy”

        As I said, non-secular jooz don’t want multiculturalism. It’s the secular jooz that have bought into it because they buy all lefty ideas. Some of the comments are also interesting.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 10:19 pm Anonymous

        “Non-secular jooz don’t want multiculturalism. It’s the secular jooz that have bought into it because they buy all lefty ideas. Some of the comments are also interesting.”

        Sure, sorta. It is possible to be a secular Israeli. The point is, do you recognize the real threat, or do you not? Some of the clearest thinking I’ve seen has come to me from secular Israelis.

        The US’s problem is not “non-secular jooz” (a string of words which, in and of themselves, would seem bizarre and humourous in a rational world). The US’s problem is the self-hating, Leftist Jooz (as well as all of the other self-hating Leftists of every other stripe).

        Our schools have taught them well. To hate Murika.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 10:37 pm Lily

        I posted another video of a Joo Swedish politician who is speaking against multiculturalism. This is in contrast to that stupid woman who thinks multiculturalism is good. It went to moderation. Maybe it’ll post tomorrow.

        He said in part:

        “Joo Kent Ekeroth is AGAINST multiculturalism, He’s Swedish politician, MP of swedish ANTI-immigrant party Sweden’ Democrats, He speaks out against immigration and against islamisation, Jooz are not worse and not better than non-jooz – some ones are against multiculturalism, some ones are pro …..”
        _________________________________________________________

        Well, Israelis are different. All Israelis, secular or not, see things differently because they have been educated in Israel where there is no PC nonsense. They know the who the real enemy is.

        “The US’s problem is the self-hating, Leftist Jooz (as well as all of the other self-hating Leftists of every other stripe).”

        Exactly. Those Jooz don’t practice their religion, and even hate it. In fact, they think all the jooz problems stem from their jooishness. Same as self-hating whites who are so guilty for slavery they think it’s just that Obama should be president.

        You’re very accurate in respect to the self-hatred of these people; it identifies them as a special kind of lefty – the worst kind.

        LikeLike


      • on February 20, 2013 at 2:58 am Lily

        @Anonymous ∞

        You’re right about Israelis. They understand Islam and its dangers.

        Wow! Here is a scary video – it shows Islam and its effects on Europe. Unbelievable, the violence these Muslims are committing. Some of them admit to raping European girls. Swedish and French officials are interviewed about how they try to keep the peace in their respective countries. It’s unbelievable to live under such conditions. If this PC violent lifestyle comes to America we’re a fucked. So far, Europe has a PC society so they try to keep the peace, not crush the Muslims. At least in America the police is much effective, but of course now that Obama is president, racism is thrown into every action of the police, and 3rd worlders have much more leeway to get away with shit.

        Also, read the comments to this video. Many angry comments against Islam and Muslims. Many Muslims bating everyone by saying they will conquer the world. Also, the usual Joo haters. Those seem to come out of the woodwork since they don’t really care about multiculturalism or Islam; they just look for any excuse to spread their joo hatred.

        “Israeli infiltrates European Muslim community part 1 of 4“

        “This is the first part of a four-part Israeli documentary by Zvi Yehezkeli and David Deryi about the Islamization of Europe. It has been translated from the Hebrew and subtitled in English. THE FILMMAKER IS AN ARABIC-SPEAKING ISRAELI whose appearance and flawless Arabic accent were sufficient to allow him to mingle freely with the Muslims in several “no-go zones” in SWEDEN and FRANCE, and to get an inside look at the Islamic mindset within the greater European community.”

        LikeLike


  7. on February 14, 2013 at 4:16 pm gunslingergregi

    Exhibit A: Multiculturalism. Who pushes this shit? The descendants of Viking berserkers? No.”””’

    lolzzzzzz

    LikeLike


  8. on February 14, 2013 at 4:24 pm gunslingergregi

    i was in an italian resteraunt a real one had 2500 pictures on the wall from back in the day
    and god dam those woman in them were ugly
    and that was when ya prob had the italian mafia right
    so i am beginning to form a hypothesis that the uglier your woman are the more you are prone to do illegal shit to escape them
    i went to indo nobody robbing people cause they got hot bitches washing their clothes by hand in the river and get virgins at marriage
    it was cool though i’m not usually around people in suits and talking with big words and shit i felt comfortable like i belonged there
    the vocabulary was impeccable

    LikeLike


  9. on February 14, 2013 at 4:29 pm Rick Derris

    Exhibit B was rather interesting, especially the fourth result, which was this rant by that overgrown pile of stinking dog shit and maggots called Michael Moore:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/dear-government-of-sweden_b_798061.html

    Gee, Mikey, why don’t you put down the can of lard and check the stories above your bloviating in the search results? Maybe the multi-culti fools in Sweden are too pussified to go after the creeps who are actually committing the rapes. Nah, that can’t be it. Must be W’s fault.

    LikeLike


  10. on February 14, 2013 at 4:31 pm Phinn

    >>> “A nation of tops is Zimbabwe. A nation of bottoms is raped into the history books.”

    This is why I love visiting the Chateau. You can’t find this kind of brutally offensive honesty just anywhere.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 5:05 pm Johnny Guit

      Rhodesia was raped into the history books as was South Africa

      LikeLike


  11. on February 14, 2013 at 4:32 pm Tyrone

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/iceland/9866949/Iceland-considers-pornography-ban.html

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 7:52 pm Laconophile

      Jeez, Iceland sure is anti-semitic.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 4:11 pm Lily

        Yep! The Jew/feminists in Iceland finally got their way. Oh, no! The tribe is running Iceland.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 2:17 pm Anonymous

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 6:21 pm Lily

        Yeah, blame the tribe for every depravity. All sexual morality in the west (and the world) comes from the tribe, whether it’s anti-incest, anti-homosexuality, or anti-premarital sex. Try to skew the truth to fit your evil agenda all you want, but it won’t change the truth. While everyone was busy marrying their blood relatives, and fucking men, the tribe was preaching against it. It’s in their Bible, forgot?

        This guy is just a hater, in a long line of haters. He ties his anti-Israel hatred with different conspiracy theories against the tribe. I can see thorough him plenty.

        If the story is true (which I very much doubt, as I don’t take anything form the hatemonger in that clip seriously), and they did put pornography on Palestinian TV during that military offensive he was recalling, it wasn’t because they were freeing the Palestinians of their mores, as this nutjob contends; it’s because it was part of the war to demoralize the Palestinians. The Palestinians are in a war with Israel, where they should just shut the fuck up and go to Jordan where they belong. They won’t stop their war, so the incident if true was tantamount to Abu Ghraib when America put women in charge of torturing Muslim men to demoralize them. It’s obvious, the Israelis put that stuff on Palestinian TV to keep the men inside and to stop the fighting. I say if true, it’s ingenious. Would those bloodthirsty terrorists like it better if they got their brains blown up, or did they rather watch porn for a few hours? Don’t they say they want to go to heaven and have their 72 virgins. Israel was giving them a taste of that. LOL!!!!

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 6:27 pm Anonymous

        Blaming the Tribe is intellectually lazy and racissss.

        The Tribe is, like all tribes, a supremacist Tribe, when you peer deeply into their documents, but I am more worried bout

        P.S. Long live Israel. Aside from the ¡Socialismo! they’ve got going on there, I would take 1 Israeli for every 10 self-hating 0bama-licking Joo we’ve got my fair country. Those folks know evil, and know how to combat it, and so they are my allies.

        P.P.S. There is no such thing as a Palestinian.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 6:28 pm Anonymous

        Oops.

        … but I am worried more bout _Islam and Leftism_.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 7:22 pm Lily

        “P.P.S. There is no such thing as a Palestinian.”

        Mr. Infinity, you really know your stuff, don’t you? It’s true Palestine never existed in history until the Arabs thought of it in the 1960s, as yet another way to destroy Israel.

        “P.S. Long live Israel. Aside from the ¡Socialismo! they’ve got going on there, I would take 1 Israeli for every 10 self-hating 0bama-licking Joo we’ve got my fair country. Those folks know evil, and know how to combat it, and so they are my allies.”

        BINGO!!! Israel really knows how to combat evil. No trouble racially profiling the enemy. If only America learned from Israel, most of us wouldn’t have to remove our shoes, and have our undies aired out in the nation’s airports.

        I know a few Israelis living here, and they hate Obama and don’t understand how 70% of American tribe members voted for him. They call them traitors. Hey, but we already know most American tribe members don’t really support Israel. All they support is leftism. Their houses of worship have turned to shrines for the Left. All they do is discuss Leftism, the new religion of the west. In many churches too, Leftism has replaced Christianity.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 7:29 pm Lily

        I was reading an interesting article about it recently and I can’t agree more with the author.

        http://www.dennisprager.com/columns.aspx?g=02617b1d-659b-4213-85bd-090651e03f18&url=the_worlds_most_dynamic_religion_is

        I won’t post the sections pertinent to the tribe because the post will go to moderation. You’ll have to click on the link to read that. But here is the Christian part of it.

        “Within mainstream Protestantism and Catholicism, the same dominance of leftist values exists. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops largely holds the same social and economic views as the Democratic Party and The New York Times editorial page. It differs with the left with regard to same-sex marriage, abortion and religious freedom issues such as those pertaining to Catholic hospitals and government-funded contraception. As for mainstream Protestant denominations, they, too, are largely indistinguishable from leftism. Proof? Ask a liberal Protestant minister to name one important area in which he and leftism differ. Ask a liberal Reform or Conservative rabbi the same question. Their silence will be telling.”

        Yep! Folks. Leftism has replaced religion in most synagogues and churches in America.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 7:45 pm Anonymous

        American Jews who live in Israel voted 85% for Mitt Romney, and that’s saying something, given that Romney was at best a tepid conservative.

        American Jews who live in the US simply have no clue. They are sharpening the blade that will cut their own throats.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 6:27 pm Lily

        Long posts go to moderation for some reason, so let me continue here. Why is this nutjob freaking out? And why did you even post this video? You’re an idiot too, and anyone who thinks along these lines is an idiot. This stuff is right out of demented websites like Storm.

        Like with every industry, just because there are some tribe members involved in porn, doesn’t make it a “tribe” industry. And both Larry flint and Hugh Hefner aren’t part of the tribe. Hefner is even German and Swedish. Could you imagine what kind of hate would have been hurled out if they had been part of the tribe? Those two non-tribe members are the main pushers of that garbage, which some of you like anyway. It’s mostly women who are anti-porn, because many of them have lost their hubbies to porn-watching and masturbating. So why are you even putting this anti-porn clip here? Because it’s not really anti-porn, it’s anti-tribe, that’s why.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 6:28 pm Lily

        Talk about nice two white-trash ladies , here is another porn duo. Guess who is pushing porn now? How do you like them apples?

        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2244631/The-Sexxxtons-Mother-daughter-porn-duo-theyre-going-filthy-rich.html#axzz2Jifx4lq6

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 7:30 pm Anonymous

        For you Lily, some quotes from the harmless tribe from their own mouths. Deny reality all you want, but it doesn’t change the truth.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 8:20 pm Anonymous

        I had the stomach to watch the first few quotes. These were quotes by Israelis talking about the muslimin, claiming that they were essentially barbarians.

        So while I do agree that the Jews do have a supremacist thread running through their tribe (guess what folks, so does my tribe, so does your tribe, etc.), I cannot disagree with those folks who are, as the Brits like to say, “at the coalface”, dealing with the muslimin up-close-and-personal.

        The conflict between the West and Islam is the conflict between the 21st and the 9th Centuries. I have trouble understanding why you need help understanding this. Get used to it. It’s going to be going on your entire life, and it is very likely it is going to get far, far worse.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 8:26 pm Lily

        “Deny reality all you want, but it doesn’t change the truth.”

        It’s not reality. It’s all taken out of context. How convenient? It’s straight out of Joseph Goebbels propaganda 101.

        Haha…..you’re beyond pitiful. Please dude, you can’t brainwash people, unless they already believe your bullshit. Knowledgeable people could see through this conspiracy nonsense trying to make the tribe the enemy of the West. The tribe is not the enemy of the West. Leftism and Islam are the enemies of the West.

        For example, the first quote in this video by the former president of Israel is very famous. It’s taken right out of context, as everything else is. He was speaking after a horrific suicide attack where the Arab terrorists killed dozens of Israelis. He warned that such terrorists don’t belong anywhere near jooz. They don’t even belong in the same galaxy. These people don’t have the same morality as the jooz, since the jooz pride themselves on being the morality givers in the form of the Bible and The Ten Commandments. You might say, the Ten Commandments are the jooz claim to fame, and they are very proud of it, and they should be. So he was speaking within the context of comparing between terrorists who murder people and the jooz’ morality. Of course, you have to twist it to prove your agenda. There is nothing foreboding about what he said to warrant that idiotic music either.

        You know what, I agree with the president of Israel. Those people who kill women and children in an unjust war have no business being alive, let alone near decent people. And don’t tell me Israel kills women and children too. It doesn’t. It’s being attacked, not the other way around. I have no problem with Israel or its leaders. The Arabs are the aggressors, and once they finish off Israel, they will turn their focus more squarely on the West. So you better pray Israel is the victor. Israel is the Ground Zero of a larger war between Islam and the West. Wise up!

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 8:30 pm Anonymous

        “If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.” Thomas Sowell, a black guy from Harlem

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 8:32 pm Lily

        I didn’t bother listening to the whole thing because it’s obvious nonsense taken out of context. Clips like this by joo haters, are a dime a dozen on the internet, some produced by Arabs and some by neo-NZs.

        Also, much of your narrator foreboding voice and words is done on purpose to make it look like the tribe is the enemy of humanity. This is Joseph Goebbels propaganda 101, the Führer’s propaganda minister. Those are his tactics. Who are you kidding?

        Finally, I wouldn’t trust much of your narrator narration either, being that it’s a convenient translation to prove the clip maker’s point to view. It’s all taken out of context by losers with nothing else better to do than to ponder the jooz, and to post clips on the internet for dupes like you.

        If you want to believe in the Joo boogeyman theory, do that. I have the Left and Islam to worry about.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 3:18 pm Lily

        “The conflict between the West and Islam is the conflict between the 21st and the 9th Centuries. I have trouble understanding why you need help understanding this. Get used to it. It’s going to be going on your entire life, and it is very likely it is going to get far, far worse.”

        I understand this. It’s joo haters who try to minimize the Muslim’s influence on America and Europe, and try to direct people’s attention to the jooz. The left distracts us with pop culture, and the fascists distract us with joo hatred so we can’t see the danger right below our noses.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 3:38 pm Anonymous

        Lily, my comment was directed at the other Anonymous.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 3:44 pm Lily

        Yeah, I know. I was just saying that I understand the danger.

        Anonymous won’t respond to you. Some truths are too much to face because then you have to admit your entire doctrine is completely false.

        LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 9:16 pm Ben

      Great idea. With no porn, the white host population can be raped even harder.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 10:48 am Anonymous

      Stay tuned for open revolt in socialist hedonistic Iceland.

      LikeLike


  12. on February 14, 2013 at 4:38 pm buck fontana

    I like how the 5th result of Scandinavian rape is Michael “quintuple chin” Moore crying racism

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 4:40 pm buck fontana

      Beaten like a Scandinavian manjaw

      LikeLike


  13. on February 14, 2013 at 4:47 pm Anonymous

    I think you got it backwards, Swedish men are marrying out more often than the women(thank you feminism):

    Bi-national Marriages in Sweden: Is There an EU effect?
    http://www.suda.su.se/SRRD/SRRD_2012_2.pdf
    “Figure 1 shows the numbers of native men and women who married partners from the EU15, the new countries of the EU, and from areas outside the EU, for the period 1991-2008. The absolute numbers show a very stable pattern over time regarding marriages to EU partners, a slight increase in marriages of native men to partners from the new EU, and a considerable rise in the number of natives marrying partners from outside the European Union, especially for native men. Over the whole period, more than 21,000 marriages took place between natives and foreign born partners, of which 59 percent concerned native men and 41 percent involved native women. Among native men who married foreign born wives, only a quarter married an EU15 wife, while 37 percent of native women married EU15 husbands. Men have a higher tendency to marry new EU wives than native women do (11 versus 6 percent), but the numbers are small.”

    This is only marriages, so there is a possibility that the dating market data might tell a different story.

    LikeLike


  14. on February 14, 2013 at 4:48 pm Anonymous

    “Zimbabwe is a nation of tops”

    lollzozlzolzolz They are a nation of mindless monkeys who think a printing press can suffice for actual production. If you think this is “alpha”, I don’t care to have any part of your depravity-worshipping mindless nihilism enshrined as “alphaness”. There is nothing desirable about being a worthless bum (or living in a pre-industrial civilization), despite all your erudition which poses to the contrary. You talk alot of shit about leftists, but check your premises, and you will see they are the same.

    LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2013 at 3:42 pm Anon

      “Tops” doesn’t mean what you think it means.

      And you’re dumb as fuck.

      LikeLike


  15. on February 14, 2013 at 4:52 pm Anonymous

    Here is some good news to Europeans and Americans who want to marry a Swedish woman:

    Intermarriage and Immigrant Integration in Sweden
    http://asj.sagepub.com/content/51/4/329
    “In this article, we explore marital exogamy (especially intermarriage between immigrants and natives) among 39 different immigrant groups using cross-sectional registry data for the total immigrant populations in Sweden in 2003. Immigrants who are better educated, who spend a longer time in Sweden before marriage and live outside the bigger cities are more likely to be married to natives. Controlling for age at immigration, education, time between immigration and marriage, settlement size and the relative size of the immigrant group of the opposite sex, immigrants from Western Europe (excluding Finland) and the United States are more likely to be married to natives than are other immigrants. We also analyse the link between intermarriage and economic integration, with the results indicating a strong association between intermarriage and economic integration in terms of employment and income. Immigrants married to natives are more likely to be employed, and also to have higher individual and household income. “

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 7:54 pm Laconophile

      IOW, Muslims marry Muslims.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 6:16 am Hugh G. Rection

      Why would I (or any man) want to get married?

      LikeLike


  16. on February 14, 2013 at 4:55 pm DonnerDerien

    In Norway I’ve tried turning farmers into vikings myself. It’s impossible. The only thing they value is their pension service.

    LikeLike


  17. on February 14, 2013 at 5:09 pm The Man Who Was . . .

    Ironically, feminism is likely selecting for the sexual success of more aggressive, high testosterone alphas.

    Uh, no. Alphas may be getting the lion’s share of sex, but it’s betas who are doing the reproducing. We are selecting for beta males.

    [Heartiste: I know. I said as much. What I wonder is if the beta edge in actual reproduction wouldn’t be reversed if contraceptives were not readily available to thwart the consequences of alpha male fun times?]

    On the other hand, we are selecting for religious people, with their ingroupish, authoritarian ways. And, within that subgroup of religious people, fertility is correlated with higher intelligence and higher income.* (This is the exact opposite of what you find in the general population.) So, we are headed for a (greater beta dominated) religious elite. Elites from such a background will undoubtedly reverse much of our current foolishness, though it remains to be seen how much damage is done in the mean time.

    *Money helps you afford more sprog.

    [I’m not a big fan of religious patriarchies, but I gotta admit it seems like a better deal than what we have ruling now.]

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 5:13 pm The Man Who Was . . .

      I misread you. You said sexual success. Indeed.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 5:14 pm The Man Who Was . . .

      Of course, one should note that among the left half of the bell curve, among people who can’t be bothered with birth control, the alphas are cleaning up. We are headed for a time where religious elites rule over a vast horde of savages.

      LikeLike


  18. on February 14, 2013 at 5:37 pm n/a

    The downfall of England is yet worse. What happened to this once brilliant and ruthless island nation?

    The place right now is a fucking dump, and I feel bad for the good men who remain.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 10:48 am Anonymous

      Come soon to our country if left/libtards have their way…

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 1:22 pm Lily

      What’s happening to England is heart breaking. What a glorious place England used to be? England is among the top nations of scientific discovery and technological development. Some of the most prolific scientists in the world have been English. With all their smarts they allowed immigration to get out of control since they were trying to outdo America in so many areas thinking it’s what made America great. Immigration is not the thing that did the trick. It’s the American sprit reflected in the Constitution that made America great.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2013 at 2:30 pm santa666

        White Europeans, primarily composed of English, German, and Low Country stock, is what made America great. Not some ephemeral “spirit”.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2013 at 3:17 pm Lily

        WRONG!!!! These same people existed in their original countries, and yet their countries are not the same type of society we have here. It’s the new type of thinking as reflected in the Constitution that made America great. After the Bible, The American Constitution bar none is the greatest document on earth. People are great and have potential, but you must lead them to get the most out of them. While we stuck to the Constitution things were good in America. When we started to move away from it, things started unraveling. The sprit in which this country was established in reflected in the Constitution.

        Why are some people trying to hide that? If you don’t like it, whether you’re white or brown you should leave and go elsewhere where they have no American Constitution, but they do have a nice form of communism and a little bit of mob rule. Good luck!

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2013 at 6:42 pm santa666

        Right… Do you know what the Magna Carta is? Have you ever wondered WHY the Constitution and similar works only ever seem to come out of white western, primarily anglo peoples? It is an offspring of culture, and culture is an offspring of genetics.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 12:14 am Lily

        Haha……I was waiting for you to tell me the Magna Carta. While the Magna Carta is without question a great legal document, both the Bible and The Constitution trump it in greatness. But, there is no doubt the Magna Carta is up there in importance among top western documents. It’s the first time since the Old Testament we encounter a challenge to the King’s power, and that set the whole process in motion – the idea that government cannot enslave the individual. You might say Magna Carta is the ancestor of most constitutions, including ours.

        About whites and genetics, I often said that whites have both in their genes and psyche strong convictions of freedom – the idea that no man or government could subjugate the individual. We had given the world this idea. It’s reflected in all 3 of these documents. The Declaration of Independence too. Let’s not forget what is true freedom, and what is the essence of the founding of this great land, while we are so fervently and passionately trying to return to our roots.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 1:12 am santa666

        Pearls before swine Lily. What good is a great thing if nobody is able to recognize its greatness?

        Most races enjoy quasi-comfortable subjugation. Freedom isn’t for everyone.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 2:05 am Lily

        Of course, you’re right. I often say democracy is not for everyone, and we should never get involved in useless wars to bring democracy to races that neither understand nor want it. Not everyone is meant to be democratic. Some places do better when they have a despot controlling them.

        That said, we still have to serve as the example and the reminder of how things should be. We’re the standard. We’re the beacon of light, lest humanity forgets the heights it could reach. So long as America is around, humanity cannot forget what is right, despite the love for despots or other inferior-type of governments on the part of some. Setting an example is the greatest of America’s mission. It’s not going and freeing/helping nations and people who don’t understand freedom, want it, or even appreciate us. I rather see other nations trying to emulate our form of regime on their own, than we going to help them when either they don’t appreciate it or merit it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 4:16 am Anonymous

        What makes our European descendants different from their still-European cohorts is, I believe, a form of natural selection that occurred when the Americas were colonized.

        I look forward to the discovery of the “gumption gene”. We will some day, I believe, find that those that are naturally predisposed to hard work and risk-taking got on that boat and came to America, and the source populations lot out on their gumption genes, and America became the beneficiary of streams of populations from Europe that were preselected for gumption.

        Fast forward through 200+ years of war in Europe, where those with the gumption gene were eradicated by war (especially WWI and WWII), and … here we are.

        P.S. There are and always will be outliers, like Thor, etc.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 6:22 pm Anonymous

        P.S. The “Magna Carta gambit” is almost as tired as the Algebra gambit. Leftists invariably throw this at me to demonstrate how Islam has indeed contributed to society, because they gave us algebra. Hey, it’s even in the word, you knuckle-dragger! Al gebra! Yeah, ok morons, thanks for the history lesson, wherein you omit the fact that the Greeks and others were clearly running what we now term as algebra many, many years before the Arabs/Persians laid claim to it. Oh, and by the way, most of the smart stuff that came out of the dar al Islam was actually proffered by Jews living as dhimmis in Persia. The muslimin don’t like that fact much.

        LikeLike


  19. on February 14, 2013 at 5:51 pm Thor

    The beginning of the end was the introduction of stirrups, ca 1066, it helped William the Bastard become William the Conqueror. .Without stirrups, fighting ON horseback is severely constrained, you tend to just fall of, so in antiquity people would ride TO battle and then dismount – fighting on horseback would just make you fall off soon enough.

    The vikings with their fleet ships with minimum draft had the run of the European coasts. They could pretty much run over or run down any of the locals. Until the locals came in on horseback with stirrups. And Viking ships were not suitable for carrying lots of horses.

    And yes, women in effeminate countries often go for third.world men, whether because of hyperinfracaniphilia or because those men are more alpha is hard to tell. These women exist in the US as well,, think Ann Dunham.

    Thor

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 4:30 pm Lily

      “And yes, women in effeminate countries often go for third.world men, whether because of hyperinfracaniphilia or because those men are more alpha is hard to tell. These women exist in the US as well,, think Ann Dunham. “

      women in effeminate countries go for 3rd worlders not because the men are more alpha. Who wants ugly and stupid and consider him alpha?

      No, they go for 3rd worlders because the traditions of effeminate societies have been compromised. When you start telling your people garbage like Mesoamerican culture is on the same level as Western culture, or that the shaman or the witch doctor in west Africa has ways of healing this shit or that shit while western medicine is bad, the society begins to believe it, starting with weak-minded lefty women who like to show how equality-prone they are. Fuck ‘em! The 1960s were the most brain-frying decade in the annals of the West.

      Every university in America teaches this shit. They have course ending in studies dedicated to this nonsense.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 4:44 pm Anonymous

        Women (and weak men) want someone to lead them. Certainty is an aphrodisiac/loyalty-creator. It’s also called “Frame Control”, “Conviction” and other things.

        Strong males with simple and certain mindsets can get a long way in this life.

        And yes, the ’60s were stupid and largely unhelpful to our society. But a lot of women whored themselves out because it was cool, so the alphas benefitted from that. What we have now with the Lena Dunderhead crowd is even more of that whoring. I saw a few episodes of that show, and her fvck buddy fvcks her almost like he’s raping her, and she thinks this is normal, or at least tolerates it. “Sex in the City” indeed.

        So, yay for us men who get to do whatever we like, and boo! for both the women that participate/enable and our society as a whole. Ain’t feminism great?

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 2:33 pm Lily

        So discouraging how stupid and whorish women have become. Women used to have basic wisdom, now they have nothing to offer except their cheap STD-ridden pussies. They’re not even beautiful once they slept around too much. Don’t get me started.

        “Ain’t feminism great?”

        It’s good for men looking just for sex. It’s not good for society when the women of that society are complete whores. Women are complicit in the destruction of the west, no question about it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 3:28 pm Anonymous

        Correct, with one small guidance – women are actually at the Vanguard of destroying Western Society.

        Feminism = Cultural Marxism. Those that understand this in the movement are the Vanguard, those that work with and for the movement are the Useful Idiots.

        It’s always helpful to know your Lenin. It makes all of this so easy to understand.

        Proceed.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 5:03 pm Canadian Friend

        White women do not like third world men for a logical reason, it is not rational, it is some kind of primal instinct, it is the animal attraction to men who will take them and border line rape them; the typical female fantasy is being taken by force and border line raped (or raped)

        she will deny it but that is what she wishes for; which is why romance novels ( from Arlequin to Fifthy shades of grey ) that sell the most ALL are about the heroine being taken sexually by force by the big strong good looking man.

        It is the same as women who say they wish they could have a nice guy but always end up sleeping around with bad boys who treat them badly

        what their vagina want is stronger than what their brain wants

        they deny it but look at their actions not their words

        Civilization has made white men nice guys,

        less or un-civilized men from third world are more sexually brutal which is what women secretely long for

        women’s vaginas tell us more about them than their brain

        white men tend to be nice guys while third world guys tend to be bad boys

        women’s vagina want bad boys, third world men tend to be bad boys

        the vagina is stronger than the brain

        it is that simple

        I love LOVE women but man!! they are messed up in the head beyond what I could ever describe even if I was a talented writer

        Women are fucked up in the head

        … except for you Lily 🙂

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2013 at 11:41 pm Lily

        Canadian Friend, I agree with everything you said about women’s desires, however, my original comment still stands and here is why.

        Western civilization is effeminate because it’s been compromised. It is not respected by its owners as the greatest civilization in history. Its own people are being told by moral relativists and cultural equalists the erroneous notion that all civilizations are on par with it. This in turn lets feeble-minded women allow themselves to dabble in men from these lower cultures. If brown culture wasn’t so highly pedestalled by pop culture, I guarantee most women wouldn’t be so interested in its men. There will always be a deviant here and there, but it wouldn’t be as common as it’s today.

        It’s true that women like to be raped by men they fancy. Key word is fancy – men they fancy. It used to be that women fancied the good-looking white man And indeed, romance novels are all based on this fantasy – the myth of the handsome alpha conquering her sexually – 50 Shades, as you mentioned. Except, today the standard and quality of the handsome man have been opened to the acceptance of browns, because culture tells women browns are equal to white men.

        A good example is Kim K with Kanye West. Kim K is the epitome of this trend. She is a flaming liberals, as is the rest of her family, having very little morality or traditional values. She had many lovers, and even a sex video a la Paris Hilton. In fact, she and Hilton were friends at some point and Hilton mentored her on sex video arts. Kim has often been seen with browns, but married a white man – a celebrity athlete. The marriage lasted a few weeks – maybe it was a stunt, maybe the real deal – but she dumped her white husband. Meanwhile, she hooks up with Kanye and is having a child with him. 50 years ago this wasn’t considered normal. Only the most outliers of liberals did this. Barak Obama’s mother was one of those outliers.

        Most traditional and conservative women wouldn’t look twice at subpar men. I’m a woman who has been trained in conservative thought, so the idea wouldn’t cross my mind, no matter how exciting the sex promised. I don’t find these men quality or on the same level as me, so my level of excitement to such men is practically dead. The thought just sickens me.

        See how to compromise the culture is to destroy it from within? How many Kim Ks are there? Tons. But not 50 years ago, although Barak Obama’s mother was one early adopter of this trend. She was an outlier in her day. Today, no one would look twice at such behavior unless you’re of a traditionalist/conservative background.

        So indeed, women have potential for such corruption, but as long as the culture was against it, such female propensity was kept dormant, and that’s what counts, keeping it dormant. We all know females have a potential for such behavior, which is why in almost every culture female sexuality was controlled. Now that it’s not controlled any longer, it’s free to reach the height of depravity.

        “Women are fucked up in the head
        … except for you Lily :-)”

        🙂 That’s because of my conservative upbringing. I can’t take credit for it otherwise.

        LikeLike


  20. on February 14, 2013 at 5:55 pm St Hubbins

    Similar situation in New Zealand. A survey shows that supposedly a 44% of NZ men feel confident enough to approach women. Check out the sad metrosexuals here and the ugly women…

    http://tvnz.co.nz/seven-sharp/blokes-too-scared-talk-women-video-5341857

    LikeLike


  21. on February 14, 2013 at 5:59 pm sunhater

    In Ancient times Scandinavians / Germanics used to be some kind of blonde niggers; They are more useful now.

    LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2013 at 11:15 am thwack

      yeah, niqqers and Germans BOEFF have trouble with that “TH” sound

      lol

      LikeLike


  22. on February 14, 2013 at 6:04 pm gunslingergregi

    in england business is booming for vintage costume jewelry
    chicks trying to go back in time?

    LikeLike


  23. on February 14, 2013 at 6:11 pm MRGKC

    The reason why the Scandinavians of today are uber-PC wusses (should not be exaggerated though, see below) and the Vikings were awesome killing machines are… largely the same.

    The Vikings were great warriors because they had high group cohesion, high trust, and high levels of individual competency and contentiousness.

    Today, Scandis make excellent PC Drones, because they are conformists, and are very trusting of authorities (who with one voice tell Scandis that PC is the Good, and opposition to PC is Evil). Society still functions pretty well, because high levels of individual competency and contentiousness allows people to route around problems caused by PC.

    PS.
    We should not underestimate the amount of resistance to PC in Scandinavia though. All Scandinavian countries have substantial “far-right” parties that are far, far, to the right of the Republicans on immigration, Islam, etc.

    Part of the reason for the extreme levels of PC in Sweden is a backlash to the rather violent and extensive neo-nazi/skinhead movement that was a reaction to immigration in the 90-ies.

    To sum the PS. up: You´re never going to see this electoral TV spot on national television in the US:

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 5:45 pm Northman

      I agree there is a natural conformity found in Nordic countries which led to the Viking age, Christian unification and finally full blown Socialism. Scandinavians are still considered to be world class warriors. Check their exploits in Afghanistan and Iraq.

      LikeLike


  24. on February 14, 2013 at 6:26 pm The Other Jim

    1000 years ago your typical guy in Scandinavia was some guy named Viggo Kinslayer on his way to the British Isles to loot, rape, and pillage.

    Now?

    Now your typical guy in Scandinavia is some transsexual named Vikki Knutsen on “her” way to England for London’s Fashion Week.

    How sad…

    In some ways I think the Post-WWII US domination accelerated Sweden’s(and Western Europe’s) development into a Socialist Welfare State. When you’ve got Alpha Male United States doing the bulk of military operations the European socialist welfare states learned they could buy their citizens all sorts of “goodies” eg Universal Healthcare, Pensions, Welfare, etc. thus allowing the unnatural state of single motherhood, bastardy, Feminism, Gays, multiculturalism as the cultural norm in countries like Sweden.

    Now that the US is bankrupt this unnatural state won’t exist for long as Swedes and Europeans will learn quite brutally that the real world won’t allow these luxury ideologies to go on. The US Legions will be withdrawn and Europe will find itself overrun with all sorts of barbarians(Muslims, Russians, Africans, etc)
    just like when Rome withdrew before the Dark Ages.

    Reality is a bitch Feminazi’s and Homosex deviants.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 4:36 pm Lily

      “Viggo Kinslayer on his way to the British Isles to loot, rape, and pillage.
      Now?
      Now your typical guy in Scandinavia is some transsexual named Vikki Knutsen on “her” way to England for London’s Fashion Week.
      How sad…”

      Sad, but hilarious the way you put it. 🙂

      The rest of your comment, spot on!

      LikeLike


  25. on February 14, 2013 at 6:31 pm Erudite Knight

    Makes sense, the true alpha guys left or got killed, betas left behind. We need a new frontier.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 7:58 pm Laconophile

      Yes, and massive breeding harems for the few remaining pagan-minded men.

      LikeLike


  26. on February 14, 2013 at 6:31 pm Jeremy

    Ah…. IF you MISS the self-correction and your society plunges into matriarchy…

    THIS HAPPENS:
    http://www.returnofkings.com/2090/how-black-america-has-predicted-our-future
    http://alphaisassumed.wordpress.com/2013/01/16/the-blood-red-pill/

    LikeLike


  27. on February 14, 2013 at 6:45 pm feministx

    “The removal of societal constraints on female sexuality allows for the flourishing of women’s hypergamous impulses,”

    There isn’t much hypergamy in preferring arab men to scandaniavian men.

    [Heartiste: Depends how you define alpha. A non-feminist, patriarchal, free spirited arab could certainly seem more alpha to a Swedish woman than a beta herbling who pees sitting down and dutifully mouths fembot platitudes.]

    Females didn’t invent post modernism. That was some angry male nerds with an axe to grind.

    [Yeah, but a horde of quasi-dykes took up the banner with gusto.]

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 3:12 pm feministx

      [Yeah, but a horde of quasi-dykes took up the banner with gusto.]

      “[Heartiste: Depends how you define alpha. A non-feminist, patriarchal, free spirited arab could certainly seem more alpha to a Swedish woman than a beta herbling who pees sitting down and dutifully mouths fembot platitudes.]”

      Yeah I guess. It definitely helps that a lot of arab men are actually good looking, which is a Nordic man’s trump card.

      “[Yeah, but a horde of quasi-dykes took up the banner with gusto.]”

      Post modernism had it’s place. It may never have been right, but I understand how it arose when it did. White people had to take a look at themselves after they slaughtered 6 million jewish people for no reason, destroyed all of their cities, forcibly converted native americans to a religion that they soon after decided to stop clinging to etc. Then white people felt like jerks, collectively because the non-western world wasn’t capable of inventing an industrial holocaust or expansive colonialsm. So they went through a period of self loathing and self doubt where they questioned if everything they were proud of was really worth being proud of.

      Now things are slowly changing. Multi culturalism is extremely unpopular except for in a few arcane academic circles. The anti post modernists of the western world should actually be thankful for the fundamentalist muslims because they love to play the villain and it gets people thinking. They love to poke and prod western sensibilities in a way that hapless poor mestizos cannot do. Gradually, western populations are standing up for their concept of their concept of reason and law and order.

      LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 6:17 am C

        “slaughtered 6 million jewish people for no reason”

        bitch, stop troling.

        LikeLike


  28. on February 14, 2013 at 6:59 pm bedrich

    Are pitbulls a substitute for all those aborted alpha babies?

    LikeLike


  29. on February 14, 2013 at 7:00 pm The Karamazov Idea

    There are also good explanations as to why Scandinavian women are often of such high levels of physical attraction from the raiding tendencies of the Norse. Observe the Norse mating ritual

    1. Young viking goes on raid
    2. Finds prettiest woman in village.
    3. Eviscerates her father
    4. Takes all of the valuables
    5. Carries screaming woman off over his shoulder
    6. Happily married with kids.

    LikeLike


    • on February 19, 2013 at 4:14 am Anonymous

      Am not sure it really happened that way. I think any LTRs with non-Vikings that Vikings had where when/where the Vikings set up shop, like in Northern England and Eire.

      ∞

      LikeLike


  30. on February 14, 2013 at 7:40 pm the fauvist

    The idea that the toughest Scandinavians left during the Viking Age is flat-out wrong…Sweden was pound-for-pound the best fighting force in Europe from Gustavus Adolphus all the way to the Great Northern War in the early 1700’s. Centuries after the last longboat raid, Sweden was able to hold off and defeat countries many times more populous, as they were tough and smart on the battlefield.

    One of the reasons the welfare state got so much backing was because after WWII, Sweden still had a great deal of its industrial base and had the ability to make lots of money by providing bombed-out Europe with lots of stuff…in order to make the most of it they had to push “equality” in the workforce to double their labor pool, and that’s what they did. And one of the more interesting thing is that once you get past the rhetoric and idiotic feminist laws, it’s not all equality and rainbows…check the stats on construction workers and engineers in Norway, it’s predominately men.

    LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2013 at 7:54 pm tois95

      so what your saying is that its autocorrecting itself. (in Norway)

      LikeLike


  31. on February 14, 2013 at 8:17 pm Big Game Hunter

    Our Lord and Master CH (and as good manners and customs dictate, I will add here the mandatory “no homo” disclaimer), I respectfully disagree with some of these thoughts, in particular, this explanation

    “I suspect the Scandinavians with the strongest temperaments left long ago as Vikings, same as that the bravest Englishmen left for the colonies.”

    of modern Scandinavian or Nordic (since, let’s face it, Finland is going through the same shit Viking Scandinavia is going through, only a little behind) betaism, feminazism and multiculturalism, in short, general cultural weakness, as simply a result of “all the tough alphas went off to war and never came back, and left behind only betas.” I am not a scientist, just an honest working man, but I don’t believe that simplistic explanation for a second (and that’s not even because it seems to imply the unspoken thought of “and all those tough alphas came here where I live, and made the superduper civilization of insert country name here, until betas moved in to fuck it up”).

    My theory, as a Finnish man, with Swedish blood and plenty experience in Scandinavian culture?

    There are multiple factors, but where it all really started was Christianity and the continental European population explosion. The Nordic region was never very richly populated, due to the harsh winters and shit. The Nordic paganism was pretty… rough stuff. Read up on Viking religious beliefs if you’re interested guys, but in short, that’s not the “care for your fellow man and turn the other cheek” kind of faith. When Christianity reached the North, well, the North was never the same afterwards. Meanwhile, people in the warmer parts of Europe were breeding like rabbits. Where does this lead us? To a situation where the Vikings had been softened by Christianity, while they grew more and more outnumbered every day as compared to the south. From a military point of view, that’s not such a good position.

    Still, the Nordic male toughness didn’t vanish anywhere. Even Christian Sweden managed to kick plenty continental European ass until roughly the Napoleonic age, where the numbers and economics were so far stacked up against them that maybe Superman could have pulled some kind of a victory out of that hand of cards. So, that’s the point where the North could definitely kiss goodbye any thoughts of being a major power. And where to go from there?

    Being a small player on the defensive, with countries like an imperialist Russia looming next door with a zillion zerglings ready for action. This leads to a mentality where you have to stick together with your people, or you get pasted by any one of those other parties who vastly outnumber you. Nordic women have always been pretty tough, for a reason. Out here, in those more primitive times, they had to be able to survive in hard conditions. Hell, my grandfather didn’t have electricity of any kind when my father was born. Grandmother was tough as nails, a real outdoor woman. She could cook and weave, sure, and took care of the kids, but she could handle an axe and shoot and survive outdoors in the winter, too. True, she didn’t pretend she was the head of the family like some modern feminazi, but she wasn’t any house slave either, like some women in some other places, whether that’s good or bad. In short, the environment of the north has been the sort to demand even females to be pretty tough, lest they die with their children. This of course has men respect them as more equal than they would those indoor girls who cry at the sight of blood and mice, and can’t survive a minute without a man hovering over them to do things that require hand-brain coordination. Point being, the north was somewhat “equalist” from the beginning, in the sense that men knew that women, too, could do useful shit outside the kitchen and child-rearing, if they put an effort into it. They weren’t men, true, but they weren’t helpless children, either.

    See where I’m going with this? Only one truth at a time is allowed, only one team to root for. Everyone on the same side, man and woman, because otherwise we get fucked by someone with more dudes. Meanwhile, technology marches on, and World Wars break out. Sweden manages to stay out, everyone else not so lucky. Ever heard of Lauri Törni or Simo Häyhä? These guys were not betas. Then, folks have to stay on their toes to not offend the Big Red Machine next door to the east. Finlandization, all that, and it’s not just Finland that suffered from it. All the north is bending over backwards to appear to everyone as non-confrontational as possible, because nobody feels like having another war again. Everything that comes from the outside is instantly accepted, because folks don’t want to pick a fight. Feminism? Sure why not! Multi-culturalism, let’s go with that. The north tries to fit in to the rest of the world’s ideas and ideology, for fear of getting yet another war, with even less chance of coming out of it alive than the previous times. No matter how tough shit you are or aren’t, quantity has a quality all of its own.

    We have “turn the other cheek” Christianity softening up the Viking spirit, we’ve got the geo-political reality of having to suck up to bigger more populous neighbors all around us in order to avoid getting stomped, and then we have said neighbors actively trying to spread, all over the world, whatever their ideology of choice. And guess who are going to welcome such ideologies, to not invite confrontation? Yeah. Pour all of this at once upon a group of people, like, say, Scandinavians, who so far had had 1) no experience dealing with folks like Africans and Arabs or even Asians, so they had little idea exactly how different different people could be, making multiculturalism easier to swallow as an idea (and much harder, as a reality, but then it’s already too late) and 2) had plenty experience of women doing useful stuff without crying for male help, from working the fields to even some hunting, so the idea of males and females as equal didn’t feel so completely fucked up as it must feel to some muslim looking at his women wearing burkhas. What do you think you’ll get?

    The age of the berserkers is over. One nuke, and all your berserkers are history. The Viking alphas didn’t move off to fucking Australia or disappear into the ether, they just didn’t feel like dying in hopeless wars, so they chose to do something else. I don’t think all hope is entirely lost, though. The alphas are here still, and there’s plenty tough attitude to go around even in the not top class alpha males. The Nordic countries, or their populations to be more precise, are very divided. There’s the whacked out multiculturalist feminazist globalist “world-hugger” elite, and then there’s normal people. There’s still plenty of the normal people around, people who don’t entirely, or some not at all, swallow the BS from what you’d probably call SWPLs. I doubt very much if the average person in the North is half as feminazi as the average American, in truth. I don’t live in the USA, to be sure, but I have now spent some time there, and… uh…, well, it didn’t feel exactly less feminist than, say, Sweden. If anything, it felt much more so, what with all the whacked out alimonies and such. And as for the men… perhaps I’m a tad biased, but it’s very, very hard for me to view American males as any tougher or less beta than, say, Swedish.

    In any case, I don’t think all that much matters. I think big things are about to happen. They must. People from Africa and the Middle East are pouring into the north, and something must happen. Either people just accept it and fade away, giving the north up for a smaller version of multicultural America (thanks, America, by the way, for that cursed idea of everyone having to be so fucking multicultural – you guys have been about the most benevolent superpower imaginable in history, and this one thing is your biggest sin, and it may yet doom us all, including yourselves), or rise up to protect the place, to keep it, “monocultural”, so to speak. And this must happen soon. In Sweden, the population graphs do not look pretty. They may be a somewhat lost cause. The others, not so much. But conflict is probably going to happen quickly. Or if not, then we’re looking at setting up an African province right here on the Arctic Circle, which seems a slightly unnatural thought to me, and a completely natural, indeed inevitable, event to the multiculturalist lunatics.

    Long post, not much sense, I fear, but them’s the breaks when you’re frustrated.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 12:28 pm corvinus

      Will the idea of Christianity turning people into beta pansies just die already. The only reason people nowadays think so is because “turn the other cheek” is the only aspect of Christianity — and one heavily distorted into ridiculousness, I might add — which is acceptable to SWPLs, libtards, and puling manboobs.

      The Spaniards who took out the Aztec and Inca empires — remember that the Inquisition was keeping pure Catholicism enforced in Spain at the time — would treat modern “Christians” like modern schoolyard bullies would, at the very least, and justifiably so. Heck, even modern Russian Orthodox Cossacks and the Armenians laugh at week “Christians” like that.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 12:49 pm JayMan

        Actually, Christianity was instrumental (indirectly) in reducing violence among Europeans.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 2:33 pm askjoe

        zerglings from Russia aren’t that scary, you’ve seen 300. Smart, brave men with technology can incinerate the hordes. It was French obsolescence overwhelmed by superior Teutonic technology that was the problem in WWII (of course, as we’ve seen in Iraq siege warfare against an insanely suicidal foe can make even a top notch army collapse Fallujah could’ve been Stalingrad and there’s that one battle in Chechneya where a Russian regiment got eviscerated).

        It’s about cultural confidence. The West lost it because multi-cultism made strong cultural confidence illegal, more or less (it’s hard to generalize about a whole millennia, of course). Some historical fiction about the time of the Napoleonic wars shows that these people strongly believed in their value system, culture, and while they may have respected the wogs, they weren’t going to be subjugated by them, or entertain the idea of saying all cultures are equal, so fuck it, let’s have sharia in London.

        There’s that story about the English governor in India who said, you have your traditions, we have ours…and when a man burns his wife alive, our tradition is to hang that man. Now…gay.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 4:16 pm foo

        The irony is that the English tradition is the effeminate one and the Aryan tradition is the Norse one (the Aryan/hindu books and the Norse books are both called the Eddas).

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 4:50 pm Lily

        “English tradition is the effeminate one”

        No, it’s not effeminate; it’s civilizing. The English civilized the savages, while the others you mentioned were a bunch of mindless destroyers. That’s the difference.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 5:54 pm Laconophile

        Civilizing is the same thing as emasculating.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 12:40 am Phil

        “while the others you mentioned were a bunch of mindless destroyers.”

        more jewish racism from the jew lily. Anti-germanic bigot.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 6:35 pm Lily

        @ Laconophile

        Not necessarily. A man can be highly civilized without being a beta loser. It’s called having standards.

        Anyway, I never thought violence is the mark of the alpha. I always thought it was smarts, creativity, discovery, invention, building a civilization, and male control of women constituting alpha.

        @ Phil

        First, I’m not Jewish. Second, I don’t hate Germans, but I do call a spade a spade. “If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it must be a duck”

        The truth is that the British Empire had the greatest civilizing effect on other races bar none. No other European power even gets close, and certainly not the Germans. The Germans have a long history of being a destructive force form the days antiquity, which reared its ugly head again in the 19th century culminating in the holocaust of the 20th century. That’s nothing to be proud of. And, if it weren’t for Christianity reigning them in, we’d still have lots more destruction coming from them.

        Second, America’s form of democratic government has been the greatest example of freedom, religious tolerance, prosperity and goodness the world has ever known. To try to substitute Germany in its place is a lie, and misguided wickedness. People who are brainwashed with Nazi lore might have a tough time understanding the beauty and morality of America. If you’re an American, you need a new set of morals.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 5:55 am AAB

        ‘The age of the berserkers is over.’

        Thankfully, because people are less in awe of psychology, some are getting in touch with their pagan past and the pagan understanding of human character types, including bererkers. Here’s one guy from Scandinavia who is a berserker: http://www.uppsalaonline.com/uppsala/berserk.htm

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2013 at 12:33 pm Big Game Hunter

        The idea won’t die, because it’s true. Now, don’t get your panties in a bunch, Christians, I’m not saying your religion is all some kind of hippie world-lover dream ideology. Yes, I’m aware of the history of Christian warriors kicking ass and taking names. Let’s skip right past that stuff, everyone’s heard of it. But honestly, if you compare Viking paganism with Christianity… do you really, truly believe that Christianity produces the more martial, aggressive and independent people and nation? If you do, then I guess we got nothing to talk about. I’m not arguing here for the greatness of being a violent savage, I’m just saying that Christianity does make you soft(er), and that’s a good thing sometimes, and shitty thing some other times.

        One of the many problems with Christianity is that it in effect contains the idea that some Arab and some Viking can somehow be brothers, united in some fashion by their belief in the one god and J.C. In this sense Christianity contains the seed of multiculturalism and anti-nationalism, one world one people BS. Whether the people who made the whole Christian faith up to gain earthly power thought that through properly or whether it’s just a random coincidental result from what they really wanted to do, who knows.

        Now, I’m not saying Christianity is the only reason for how things have turned out. It’s not. But it’s one of the reasons.

        As for the whole multiculturalism ideology, I’m not blaming it all on the Americans. Obviously not. But since you guys are kinda the top superpower, right, and are viciously for multiculturalism, it would be kinda weird to not blame you for it at all. You’re not the only guilty party, but you’re one of the biggest. Look at the kind of politics the US of A is pushing on the rest of the world? Your leaders are all for making every (white) country a multicultural “melting pot” of you know what. And yes, I’m fully aware there’s a large group of Americans who are pissed off about this to no end, maybe even more pissed off than I am, seeing how you guys have had your multiculturality (and I’m talking the kind you can find in quantities in, say, Detroit) for hundreds of years now. It don’t much matter that you’re not importing them in now as fast as, say, Sweden is. Even if you close your borders entirely now, the demographics are going to be… shall we say, interesting, in the future.

        LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2013 at 2:01 am corvinus

      Either people just accept it and fade away, giving the north up for a smaller version of multicultural America (thanks, America, by the way, for that cursed idea of everyone having to be so fucking multicultural – you guys have been about the most benevolent superpower imaginable in history, and this one thing is your biggest sin, and it may yet doom us all, including yourselves), or rise up to protect the place, to keep it, “monocultural”, so to speak.

      Again, you can’t dump this all on us Americans. We are pikers at that multiculti shit compared to a lot of other white people. We look at you Nordics, thrust out our hands and gape, saying “why the fuck are you letting all those stupid derka derkas into your country?”

      Our immigration system is in fact as restrictive as Germany’s. We let in much fewer Chinese and Indians per capita than Canada or Australia — or the U.K. under Labour for that matter. (We have 3 million Chinese, Canada has 1 million, despite having 1/10 our population!) Sure, we got flooded with Mexicans for a couple of decades, but that’s a one-off thing and hopefully is past for good.

      LikeLike


  32. on February 14, 2013 at 8:27 pm Laconophile

    As someone mentioned earlier, we need a new frontier, away from the domesticating, sheltering influence of advanced civilization and urbanity. The Africanization of the West could be a blessing in disguise if the masculine elements of our race are able to regroup into a small starting point and then expand into the decivilized remains of the West.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 4:52 pm Lily

      Right, regress.; that’s a plan.

      LikeLike


  33. on February 14, 2013 at 8:32 pm corvinus

    The most aggressive Norwegians ended up in Iceland, Ireland, and Scotland (gettin’ yer Irish up an’ all that), the most aggressive Danes in England (the Danelaw), and the most aggressive Swedes (the Rus) in Russia (the Finns even now, with their archaic language, still call Sweden “Ruotsi” after the Rus).

    In addition, Norway and Sweden (but not Denmark) lost a few million people to the USA in the 1800s. Nowadays, Norway and Sweden (but not Denmark) are getting overrun with brown people. Hmm…

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 8:35 pm corvinus

      Almost forgot the Normans, who were another group of Norwegian alphas who switched to speaking French in Normandy, and dominated England, Ireland, and Sicily for hundreds of years.

      LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 9:02 pm Big Game Hunter

      Denmark is just as multiculturalist overrun as ther others, I’m sad to say. Plenty too many brown people running over the place. A muslim just tried to assassinate islam critic Lars Hedegaard over there, posing as a postman. That place is as troubled as everywhere else.

      LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 10:55 pm JayMan

      “the most aggressive Danes in England (the Danelaw),”

      Indeed, and that gave us the Puritans, who gave us today’s SWPLs…

      Once you go back more than 200 years, you have to start taking modern features with a grain of salt…

      LikeLike


  34. on February 14, 2013 at 9:31 pm gramps

    At least in Northern Europe the brown will eventually die from lack of Vitamin D.

    But, why is Scandinavia so beta? Easy. Prosperity. Prosperity destroys everything it touches. Every time, and absolutely.

    And, why were they so aggressive? Try making a living in Norway. Ten kids and no farmland. And, it was COLD. Nobody invades North. There was no choice. And, they could build good ships and man, could they sail. They were so primitive in other ways, though. Their history is just the same story over and over. Hans kills John. Johns’ son kills Hans’ son. Repeat endlessly. But, hey, they’re my people.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 10:56 pm JayMan

      Why did it become prosperous in the first place? Why has prosperity eluded places farther south?

      LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:25 pm n/a

        Fewer problems to solve, less combat pressure on cognition.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:26 pm JayMan

        Why did they have fewer problems? Why was there less combat?

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:30 pm Tyrone

        There wasn’t less combat. The Ancient World fought every Spring. Rome was constantly at war.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:32 pm JayMan

        There’s a comment of mine that’s stuck in moderation. When it posts, you will see that there was a lot less violence in Europe as time went on. In Scandinavia, it was a rather steep drop off…

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:44 pm Tyrone

        I don’t think you know what you’re talking about. I can tell already you know very little and think you know a lot.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:35 pm n/a

        Warm is less of a problem than cold.–

        Man’s main combat-problem is with materials and the elements. When it’s cold there’s more to do and fresh neural nets are being cast all day.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:28 pm Tyrone

        Calvinism and the cultural discipline it creates.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:29 pm JayMan

        And just how did that happen?

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:41 pm Tyrone

        The aristocracy forced it on society. I think some of it is also genetic. The Romans noted that Germans made good soldiers if disciplined and Romanized. Scandinavians are Visigoths. Germans are a mix of Visi and Ostrogoths. All of these peoples are genetically similar and have similar cultures and Gods. You are far away from your so called Puritan ancestors in terms of your values and aims for society however, as a self proclaimed modern progressive, liberal. Your side seeks to undermine that hard won cultural discipline, so don’t try to tell me how wonderful your brand of paternalism is. It’s actually maternalism and it smothers and castrates any real man. Also very few dynasties had the kind of cultural discipline of the Hohenzollerns for instance.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 11:45 pm JayMan

        “You are far away from your so called Puritan ancestors in terms of your values and aims for society however, as a self proclaimed modern progressive, liberal.”

        Some of my ancestors were indeed English, but I’m not sure if any of them were Puritans…

        “The aristocracy forced it on society. I think some of it is also genetic. The Romans noted that Germans made good soldiers if disciplined and Romanized. Scandinavians are Visigoths. Germans are a mix of Visi and Ostrogoths. All of these peoples are genetically similar and have similar cultures and Gods.”

        Projecting traits backwards in time (or for that matter, the traits of ancient peoples forward in time) is always a dangerous practice…

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 9:51 am Tyrone

        You’ve obviously never spent any significant time in Europe. Live there a few years, learn their history beyond your current superficial level, and get back with me.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 1:28 pm Lily

        @JayMan

        “Why did it become prosperous in the first place? Why has prosperity eluded places farther south?”

        Small populations and they are all related. That has a lot to do with it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 1:30 pm JayMan

        Look at the Mediterranean islands. Or for that matter, any random African country. What you stated is clearly not the case.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 2:01 pm Lily

        Ah….because you also forgot to include genetics. Can you really compare the effectiveness, ingenuity, brain power, and self-control of a Norse nation with an African one? You’re comparing apples with oranges. Once you add to their smarts the fact that they don’t have to control 300 million people as opposed to 5 million in most cases, and add the fact that they are all related and don’t have to spend resources on immigrants from different genetic background with no sympathy for their host country who are only looking to take advantage, and voilà, success.

        The Mediterranean islands? People there have always been laid back easy going people with a mix of genetics form every background imaginable, since the time of antiquity when the Greek and Roman empires ruled, as they used to move the indigenous populations around. People in these areas were never about more than living the good life under the sun just like their ancestors, whether it’s Greece, Italy (even though Italy is much more prosperous than Greece), the Baltics or whatever. That’s why they grow olives and grapes and have excelled in these areas for centuries. Even Spain, Portugal, and France fall into the category of laid back to some degree.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 5:17 pm JayMan

        “Ah….because you also forgot to include genetics.”

        No. YOU forgot to include genetics, and that was what I was trying to highlight.

        My point is that the differences we see between the various European nations and between American Whites in different parts of the country are also due in good part to genetic differences. Genetic differences don’t stop at continental margins.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 4:19 pm Lily

        JayMan,

        Are you asking why America has become preposterous? Better yet, what is your original question or point of contention? You’re now starting to mix a few different issues.

        LikeLike


  35. on February 14, 2013 at 9:34 pm frozenpie77

    If what’s going on in Greece says anything, I think Europe may be in store for a Spanish Civil War Take II. And I’d be happy to be fighting on the side of the nationalists. It’s going to come down to Nationalists versus Leftist Manboobs and feminists. Then the feminists will realize that they like the manly nationalists. 🙂

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2013 at 9:37 pm corvinus

      Yup, I’ll bet a disproportionate number of Greece’s alpha males are in Golden Dawn.

      LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2013 at 10:00 pm frozenpie77

        Wonderful site, isn’t it?

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 1:27 pm Lily

        “I’ll bet a disproportionate number of Greece’s alpha males are in Golden Dawn”

        Yeah, until they rundown the country with their own brand of socialism and leftism. Golden Dawn is not on the right and not anti-feminists, and all who support them are useful idiots. When Golden Dawn and like-minded white national groups finally seize power in various European capitals , they’ll enslave their own kin. Why? Because hateful groups like them never had anything to offer their people; they just talk a good game of hateful rhetoric against others, yet they have never been compassionate to their own people either, which is pitiful. This goes back to the dawn of history. Only dupes can’t see it as it’s unfolding. But I’ll watch it far from my abode, and laugh at all the idiots who fall for every new demagogue who promises unlimited pussy, power, and status to every loser with bad teeth and bad stench who thinks he has what it takes to run things. LOL! History often repeats itself.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 5:18 pm corvinus

        I’ll agree that a Golden Dawn-run Greece would be a failure in many ways, but at the very least, it would be an alpha failure rather than a manboob failure.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 6:53 pm Lily

        Both are shit. There has to be something better. Trouble is we haven’t been such a good example of “The shining city on the hill” we were supposed to be for the rest of humanity to take notes and emulate. Instead, we let the liberals run things, as we were too lazy to take a stand against their various activists. We let pop culture distract us. Now there is no one better to emulate, which is why Europe is regressing to the days of the French Revolution, Hitler, and Stalin.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 8:16 pm J.M.

        Despite your disdainful and scornful language, you are correct, what will happen in Europe will be a disgrace when those “white nationalists” seize power. Their own people will suffer and the cause for the preservation and pride of the European culture will be in the near future irremediably destroyed once their mediocre and ignorant administrations are over.

        In a sense the very people of that continent, yes the common man and woman is responsible, for letting it all reach this state.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 4:03 pm Lily

        I’m disdainful and scornful because I have no patience for people looking to fake messiahs to save them. We have been down this road already in the West. It’s time to learn from history and never repeat again what didn’t work.

        This is what happens to a continent when it turns Godless. God forbid things become so bad here that we have mob-like rule as they had in Europe for the last 250 years. It’s enough of that garbage. Between the bloodletting of the revolutions as well as murderous despots crushing the human spirit, and Islam trying to regain a foot in Europe via sharia law and sex jihad, not to mention the EU and its crushing weight upon the citizenry, it’s a wonderment WWIII hasn’t broken out yet. But when it does, can the West win against oppression once again?

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 12:47 am Phil

        The jew lily attacks the greek party Golden Dawn, who are trying to keep Greece greek. And promotes Jewish racist ideology like “When Golden Dawn and like minded WHITE national groups finally seize power in various European captials, they’ll enslave their own kin. Because hateful groups like them… talk a good game of hateful rhetoric.” Golden Dawn are the Greek zionists, but lily demonizes only Greeks, not Israeli Jews.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 4:13 pm Lily

        @Phil

        If Golden Dawn were truly the “Greek Zionists,” nothing would stop me from backing them. However, while their principle “Greece for Greeks” is right, they are out of control and have a mob-like character, and that’s why I am opposed to them. Groups like them have been proven cruel to their own kin, which makes them a false savior, and that’s my issue. Golden Dawn, as well as other white national groups, have a neo-pagan character similar to the Nazis. The absence of God tends to make them cruel to others, but also that cruelty eventually seeps to their own people. Groups like them are drunk with power, as opposed to having a good plan to help improve the situation. And once they realize that power, it will be same old same old – just their families, close buddies and helpers benefitting, while the rest of the population becoming enslaved. That’s what I meant by not being a useful idiot for such groups.

        In addition, many of these white national groups are very similar to radical lefties and anarchists. They almost believe in the same things, and both types are drunk with power, have mob-like characteristics and Godlessness. It’s the communists and the fascists, both being two sides of the same coin.

        Thus, all revolutions should be based on the American Revolution, not the French Revolution and its mob-like character and Godlessness. You don’t have to believe in God to accept that Judeo-Christian principles have created the greatest nation on earth, the USA. Whether you believe in God or not, accept that they worked to tame the evil side of humanity. Thus, to make changes that bring success, happiness, and goodness to people, we have to go back to these precious principles, which are under attack by the Left and the white national groups who also don’t like them. That’s why I call the white national groups false saviors or false messiahs. Also, notice, I didn’t call them the Right as I don’t believe they’re rightists at all.

        Believe me I understand you, which is why I’m not attacking you like you’re attacking me. Your anger is right, but don’t let it cloud your judgment. Think before you jump on the bandwagon to support everyone who sounds good, or who has one or two principles you like while the rest sounds suspect. Be cautious. Most of these groups don’t really care about the population. All they want is power.

        LikeLike


  36. on February 14, 2013 at 9:39 pm Who Me?

    Fuck man, we live in a society where “road rage” is considered a problem in and of itself instead of a symptom of shitty, inconsiderate driving. Doesen’t matter if somone cut you off and you had to swerve to avoid hitting them, if you yell STUPID MOTHERFUCKER at the top of your lungs, you’re the guy with “anger management issues”.

    LikeLike


  37. on February 14, 2013 at 10:33 pm Anon

    I think that liberalism is deceptively complicated. It requires rewiring your natural instincts and learning new lexicon to prevent thought crime. High IQ people, Europeans in general, but especially Northern Europeans are more adept at this mental exercise.

    More importantly harsh climate and limited resources leads to more K selectiveness. Historically, Nordic countries have later marriages and lower fecundity compared to other populations. There’s also a historical precedent for female land/business ownership, etc. This is a perfect launching point for feminism and liberalism.

    And it works… in a vacuum. But the world is not a vacuum. There is always an abundance of displaced undesirables from undesirable places ready to fill the void.

    LikeLike


  38. on February 14, 2013 at 10:35 pm JayMan

    And as I said to him, the explanation is evolution:

    “I suspect the Scandinavians with the strongest temperaments left long ago as Vikings, same as that the bravest Englishmen left for the colonies.

    The only ones who are left are the descendants of the guys who stayed home to weave with the womenfolk.”

    If that were true, the places that received the colonists (Iceland in the case of Vikings, The U.S. and Canada in the case of British settlers) would be aggressive and anti-foreigner. They clearly aren’t.

    NW Europeans are today different from their medieval ancestors because of evolution. See here, here and here.

    Peter Frost and Henry Harpending have explained in further detail how this processed occurred (the latter goes into the math).

    “The alpha males of North and West Europe either moved away or died off in endless wars and pillages, and now their homelands are repositories of soft-tittied beta males.”

    And killed off by the newly anti-violence state….

    “Pure speculation, but it has bite… a nation needs its alpha males to keep the manboobery impulses of its softer, kinder, gentler beta males in check. Otherwise, some other nation’s alpha males will fill the vacuum left by the real or cultural disappearance of the native alphas, waltzing in to do the job because the native betas decided open borders to a whole world of vengeful, antagonistic losers is smart policy.”

    So how do you explain China and Japan then? Or for that matter, Russia? These countries went through very similar selective pressures as did Northern Europe (save inbreeding being proscribed). Yet, we end up with just as “soft” people…

    LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2013 at 12:47 am Difference Maker

      “So how do you explain China and Japan then? Or for that matter, Russia? These countries went through very similar selective pressures as did Northern Europe (save inbreeding being proscribed). Yet, we end up with just as “soft” people…”

      They weren’t conquered and defeated by invaders?

      They were.

      There’s no reason an invader has to kill all the betas. Someone has to do the support work. It’s nice to have a kingdom to rule over

      LikeLike


  39. on February 14, 2013 at 11:01 pm feministx

    “Pure speculation, but it has bite… a nation needs its alpha males to keep the manboobery impulses of its softer, kinder, gentler beta males in check. Otherwise, some other nation’s alpha males will fill the vacuum left by the real or cultural disappearance of the native alphas, waltzing in to do the job because the native betas decided open borders to a whole world of vengeful, antagonistic losers is smart policy.”

    Firstly, there is no way on Earth that all the alpha males of Scandanavia have disappeared. They are still there. What are they doing? Probably what you are doing. Trying to nail a bunch of women that all look like Claudia Schiffer.

    I’ve contemplated this same issue myself. It is seemingly odd that the vikings of all Europeans would become the most feminist.

    However, I have a plausible theory for why it was the Vikings that did so. And this is at a seriously whimsical level of speculation here. In most human populations, instincts towards patriarchial dominance evolved alongside the rise of sedentary agricultural societies, urbanization and the accumulation of wealth. Patriarchial societies were those where resources could be amassed and where females could be traded in marriage to form long term alliances based on resource needs. Hunter gatherer societies were less rigidly patriarchial. Hence, africans do not operate on a traditional male breadwinner female homemaker model. they are more promiscuous and less jealous of female infidelity.

    Vikings were amongst the last Europeans to develop permanent establishments, heavy reliance on agriculture and urbanization. They were sea farers that operated somewhat like nomadic hunter gatherers. They left very little behind for archeologists in terms of permanent structures or accumulated wealth.

    I have a hypothesis that instincts towards patriarchial control of women/society are actually weaker among Nordic men than they are in comparison to European populations with a longer history of agrarian based civilization. Like African men, they are physically impressive males, but not really built for wanting to guard their lineage against more patriarchial men.

    [Heartiste: I will take your theory… under consideration.]

    LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2013 at 2:51 am chris

      The whole theory behind the evolution of blonde hair in Northern Europe is that the harsh climate meant a shortage of food and men (due to hunting deaths) and so blonde hair evolved amongst women to better enhance their ability to snag a man.

      One of the main conditions of this theory is that a man could only support one wife, not several, otherwise there would have been no need to evolve blonde hair to secure a mate.

      Now if blonde hair necessitates monogamy, then you can be damn well sure that the men would have been concerned with paternity. Lack of care of paternity only ever occurs, if it does occur, in polygamous/promiscuous societies, not monogamous ones.

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 12:59 am Difference Maker

        As well, the harsh conditions in the north put extreme selection pressures on the males. Those who couldn’t make it, didn’t. If you made it, you must be good

        With the excess of females in those days this leads to a sort of laissez-faire condition in sexual relations. Though there was only enough food for the prettiest to have children

        Northern Europeans are suggested to have the lowest levels of sexual jealousy. Knowing what we know, perhaps this is not surprising. This was even observed by the Arabs of their Frankish conquerors. Middle Easterners score very highly.

        Interestingly, only something like 2% of a Northern European sample was intensely afraid of being embarrassed, whereas in the Middle East, the proportion climbs to ~33%

        LikeLike


  40. on February 14, 2013 at 11:44 pm Exurban

    “Feminism is likely selecting … alphas.”

    Quite possible, and according to Greg Cochran (The Ten-Thousand Year Explosion) populations can change much faster than previously thought. However, the agent of greatest change is likely going to be the fact that large numbers of today’s people are not going to reproduce at all. Those non-reproducers are going to include a lot of feminists, career women, bitches, and butches who would have been more likely to reproduce in pre-1960s society. Today’s mothers are predominantly (1) those who really want to be mothers and (2) those who are too stupid/lazy/flaky to avoid pregnancy. Even though the media bang on constantly about gay marriage and gaybys, it’s highly probable that a lot of homo- and quasi-homosexual people who would have gotten married and had kids in 1950 aren’t doing so today. As a result the non-black population may well be getting less gay and less manjawed (and more religious) as time marches on.

    Of course none of this refutes any of the premises of Idiocracy, the greatest comedy of the 21st century.

    LikeLike


  41. on February 14, 2013 at 11:53 pm From Vikings To Vaginas « PUA Central

    […] a plethora of comfort-maximizing gadgets, good-looking women, and generally non-dictatorial …read more Source: Chateau […]

    LikeLike


  42. on February 15, 2013 at 12:28 am Sid

    During the Council of Basel in 1434, the Swedes and the Spaniards disputed over who the true scions of the mighty Goths were. Don’t get mad at me for quoting from wikipedia,

    “In this conflict, Nicolaus Ragvaldi, bishop of Växjö, claimed that the Swedes were the descendants of the great Goths, and that the people of Västergötland (Westrogothia in Latin) were the Visigoths and the people of Östergötland (Ostrogothia in Latin) were the Ostrogoths. The Spanish delegation retorted that it was only the lazy and unenterprising Goths who had remained in Sweden, whereas the heroic Goths had left Sweden, invaded the Roman empire and settled in Spain.”

    To be fair to Sweden, it did produce many fierce sons after the Goths left, such as the Rus, the Varangians and Adolphus Gustavus. Nevertheless, it is plausible that the most ferocious and merciless warriors left Scandinavia over the centuries, leaving only pleasant male feminists to breed with the women. It has been an ongoing trend since the earliest Germanic tribes left Scandinavia, and the Teutons marched on Rome..

    Personally, I believe the great advantage the Scandinavians have had over the ages is a combination of high trust, fruitful cooperation among themselves, egalitarianism coupled with an introverted suspicion of outsiders, and immense physical strength. Look at the number of world class strongmen and powerlifters from Iceland, a country of some 320,000 people. Benedikt Magnússon deadlifted 1015 pounds (460kg), which is the world record.

    LikeLike


  43. on February 15, 2013 at 12:44 am Creo

    Here is a great Norwegian documentary called the Gender Equality Paradox. For decades now the Norwegian feminists have been trying to get girls to play with trucks and boys to play with dolls continuing on to women working as engineers and men employeed as male nurses. Regardless of huge incentives, the ratios have fallen back to typical 90/10 male/female or female/male percentages. What they realize now (but most still refuse to acknowledge) is that mens and womens brains have different “passions” and typically chase them accordingly. This is good news for men in general and especially slacker men in a new world of overachieving woman.
    This doc is long but worthwhile..like some of the lying and propaganda by experts there is unreal:

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 5:01 pm Lily

      “For decades now the Norwegian feminists have been trying to”

      Hey, I thought it was the Jewish feminists??? lol

      LikeLike


  44. on February 15, 2013 at 12:45 am AK

    Perceptive post. I have a basically similar argument here.

    LikeLike


  45. on February 15, 2013 at 1:48 am Northman

    Maddening to see all the feminization take place. It all goes back to the introduction of Christianity. Under Christianity, selection was altered to favor betas over alpha berzerkers as their brutish behavior no longer had a place in society. There is also the fact eluded to by H that many who went a-viking died or relocated.

    Perhaps the only heartening thing about the situation is the reaffirmation that people are malleable, and can adapt to their environments. In the future this can be useful as selection is continually altered by the growing circumstances.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 1:33 pm Lily

      Here we go with the anti-Christianity stuff. If you call civilizing the savages beta-izng, then you don’t understand alpha. A man can be highly civilized without being a beta loser. It’s called having standards. If it weren’t for Christianity, we would still be killing raping and pillaging.

      Wait, don’t some of you wish you can still do that? I guess, violence and violent sex is more important than building a civilization based on science and technology. I never thought violence is the mark of the alpha. I always thought it was smarts, creativity, discovery, invention, and yes controlling women effectively constituting alpha.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 7:11 pm Northman

        Vikings were savage in many matters, true. However they possessed the best ocean-going ships of their day and dominated all those they came in contact with.

        “I never thought violScandinavianthe mark of the alpha. I always thought it was smarts, creativity, discovery, invention, and yes controlling women effectively constituting alpha.”

        1. The Christians violently killed pagans.

        2. Viking Age technology was instrumental in their military success. Longships had no rival and led to vast exploration and wealth.

        3. Vikings controlled their women. Modern day Scandinavians are controlled by feminists.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 3:18 pm Lily

        “Vikings were savage in many matters, true. However they possessed the best ocean-going ships of their day and dominated all those they came in contact with.”

        True!

        “1. The Christians violently killed pagans.”

        No question about it; many times Christians didn’t practice what they preached, especially when they first became Christians and the new religion and its concepts were new in Europe. However, as time went on, and as the Middle Ages waned, the Age of Enlightened put to practice the best of Christianity’s essence. That’s the age new worlds were being discovered in pursuit of wealth, as well as religious tolerance, and the time Europeans began civilizing the savages. That was also the time revolutions and constitutions were being fought and written. You might say, Christianity reached its Zenith in the form of the British Empire civilizing effects on other cultures, and in the form of a fledgling democracy called the United States of America growing in the new world and embodying the best of Judeo-Christian values. So while Christians did their share of killing and pillaging, without Christianity and its civilizing effects on the Germanic tribes we wouldn’t have Western civilization and all its achievements.

        “2. Viking Age technology was instrumental in their military success. Longships had no rival and led to vast exploration and wealth.“

        True! The fact the Vikings were a war machine is not disputed. But they weren’t civilized. That’s the point. Christianity civilized them first, then The Reformation for some, and Calvinism for others.

        “3. Vikings controlled their women. Modern day Scandinavians are controlled by feminists.”

        Who knows if the Viking controlled their women. I am inclined to believe they did, but it’s nothing special to them alone. Most men in the days of yore controlled their women, in all civilizations everywhere. It seem that most humans throughout history weren’t brainwashed by common-sense-lacking theorists. Therefore, women were a protected class in the form of male-exercised control. Likewise, I don’t think it makes the Scandinavians of today who are controlled by feminists any weaker than other Westerners. The entire west is controlled by the shrill of the nasty ugly fat feminist. The feminists are running the show in the USA, UK, Germany, France, Scandinavia etc…and the men are complying everywhere because they have bought into that nonsense in the last 50 years. This is not just a Scandinavian issue.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 9:26 pm frozenpie77

        It’s called a Renaissance Man. 😉 Alpha.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 1:01 am Difference Maker

        Christianity is weak. I acknowledge its civilizing aspects.

        LikeLike


  46. on February 15, 2013 at 6:34 am soren

    “Selfishness beats altruism within groups. Altruistic groups beat selfish groups. Everything else is commentary” – E.O. Wilson and David Sloan Wilson

    LikeLike


  47. on February 15, 2013 at 8:04 am JS

    I lived in Sweden a few years ago. A lot of teen boys have manboobs even when they otherwise don’t appear overweight. Too much milk everywhere. 3 different types on breakfast cereal. Too much bloody cream everywhere. Too much deference to the female. Stay there too long and you’ll the notice you are slowly turning into a chick.

    LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2013 at 2:27 pm Lily

      “Stay there too long and you’ll the notice you are slowly turning into a chick.”

      Well, if men have to urinate siting down, what do you expect this will do to men? Once a woman sees her man doing this, what is she thinking in relations to him? ‘Oh, I’m crazy about him, I can’t wait till he bangs me passionately’ or is she thinking he is one of her girlfriends? A lot of a man’s power and masculinity also has to do with the way women relate to him. It creates a cycle of testosterone manufacturing. The more masculine the culture, the more masculine he becomes for the women who relate to him, which in turn makes him more masculine and a testosterone-manufacturing machine. The society in Sweden disrespects men’s masculinity. That in turn makes men effeminate. It’s a never-ending vicious cycle.

      Where is JayMan, this could be something interesting for him to investigate. 🙂

      LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 6:45 pm Thordeus Plikt

        I do agree that it is a vicious cycle as you say, but some men react to the provocations differently. I’m a Swede living in the homeland.

        For me, the cultural marxism/radical feminism dominance of the elite and the media has made me more determined than ever to fight. More “alpha” than ever, to use your term.

        There is a threshold for what a man can tolerate before he starts fighting back. I think more and more are reaching that threshold which will eventually break the vicious cycle. I just hope we won’t be too late and thus find the damage to be irreversible.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2013 at 12:48 am Lily

        It’s good Swedish men are fighting back.
        How does peeing sitting down work? Yikes, talk about cruel and unusual punishment.

        LikeLike


  48. on February 15, 2013 at 9:54 am Flavia

    Some dopey Swede posted this on a pregnancy forum I subscribe to. Seriously only in Sweden: http://www.anthropology-news.org/index.php/2013/01/07/feminine-pregnancy-as-cultural-fetish/

    “Feminine Pregnancy as a Cultural Fetish.”

    These people are giant fags, I can’t even wrap my head around it. It’s like the women were just waiting, seething, ready to cut off everyone’s balls.

    LikeLike


  49. on February 15, 2013 at 10:00 am Rus

    They left.

    When my ancestors conquered England many of them stayed. The current English population is a mix of Scandinavians and whatever they were back then. Even the english language is a mix. A lot of people also moved to France and a number of other places around the world. In short, the warriors, explorers and settlers left, leaving behind a bunch of pig farmers.

    Of course, not everyone left. I was always good at fighting and liked to do it, I have minor berserker tendencies and whenever I travel I like to walk the streets at night, almost hoping someone will try to rob me (hasn’t happened yet).

    Unfortunately all this does in a country where violence is taboo is leave me feeling frustrated and out of place. In most other times throughout history being good in a fight was an attractive trait. And there is your answer. Equality is what killed the viking.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 2:06 pm Jason

      Pizarro was a pig farmer, FYI.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 3:42 pm Dennis

        An illiterate one too, but one of the baddest cutthroats who ever lived.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 7:40 pm gunslingergregi

      Of course, not everyone left. I was always good at fighting and liked to do it, I have minor berserker tendencies and whenever I travel I like to walk the streets at night, almost hoping someone will try to rob me (hasn’t happened yet).
      Unfortunately all this does in a country where violence is taboo is leave me feeling frustrated and out of place. In most other times throughout history being good in a fight was an attractive trait. And there is your answer. Equality is what killed the viking.”””””’
      dam bro i got a tear i became an adult and life started to really suck i have become a pussy afraid of a criminal record

      LikeLike


  50. on February 15, 2013 at 1:02 pm d

    scandanavia is owned and operated by jews, thats all you need to know, end of story.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 5:17 pm Lily

      Right, so many Jews live there.!!!! Try again, dummy. Blaming the Jews for everything, even for implausible things, shows low IQ. People like you lose all credibility when you show such lack of objectivity.

      LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 6:26 am C

        most of the non-government run media in scandinavia is in fact jewish owned. enjoy failing.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 3:52 pm Lily

        Sure, haven’t you heard? The joo is controlling all of Europe. Where did you hear that? From the Dear Führer by any chance?

        Oh, and don’t tell me Rupert Murdoch buying TV stations as an example of Joo owned. He owns a huge entertainment corporation, he’s not running TV stations himself. And Murdoch is at least on the right. He’s not pushing MSNBC-type media.

        LikeLike


      • on February 20, 2013 at 3:09 am C

        i’ll tell you no such thing, bitch. restrain your philosemitic hamster. it’s fouling up our beloved chateau.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 1:04 am Difference Maker

        Swedish media is dominated by Jews. See your ignorance, and think about it

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 11:33 am Lily

        Provide proof. Then we’ll talk about who is ignorant, and who just has an axe to grind.

        LikeLike


  51. on February 15, 2013 at 2:22 pm Rider

    My friend and wise advisor, mr. CH,
    just read “The Fate of Empires and Search for Survival”, from Sir John Glubb.
    You’ll understand everything.

    LikeLike


  52. on February 15, 2013 at 4:11 pm foo

    the more interesting question is: what happened to the baddest of them all ? The *Aryans*. Original. The Real Thing. The people of the Rg (v)Edda (not the Norse Edda, the Aryan one). The Aryan religion and language.

    Those guys. They conquered all, but then managed to become even more pussified over centuries, got conquered by the muslims (!!) and then the effeminate british (!!).

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 5:33 pm Lily

      Actually, the British are not effeminate at all; they sure are more manly than most Scandinavians nowadays. In addition, who had the greatest empire since the Roman empire of antiquity, on which the sun never sets? Who has been helping US troops in Afghanistan if not the British? Get off that bullshit half-baked Aryan theory of yours; it holds no water.

      No one got conquered in Scandinavia or Western Europe by the Muslims. Get your facts straight. Except Spain, and Spain pushed them out in 1492 and they have been in decline ever since. The only ones helping them are current liberals who let them into Western countries, when they should be getting a kick in the butt instead.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 5:44 pm foo

        “bullshit half-baked Aryan theory of yours; it holds no water.”

        weird. what’s bullshit about it ? the holy aryan (v)eddas, shubhtika, laltika, swastika ? those are *all* real things, the holiest of symbols and religous writings.

        “British are not effeminate at all”

        would you like a tea while you watch muslims blow up your tube again ? the fact that such boarding school homos managed to conquer an entire aryan country (well dravidian too) and many other countries, shows how, like the vikings, the aryans become even more pussified over time.

        downright scary.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 5:49 pm pst105

        No one got conquered in Scandinavia or Western Europe by the Muslims.

        You are confused. The original post is talking about the Aryan country of India. It was conquered by both the Muzzies (partially) and British (entirely).

        The muzzies are conquering Europe as we speak though.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 6:44 pm Lily

        “You are confused. The original post is talking about the Aryan country of India.”

        I see. Well, it’s hard to understand when one writes like they mutter.

        However, the essence of my post remains the same. First, he/she thinks the Aryans from India or Persia are the real thing. That’s debatable. Who knows who the real Aryans were, or if they even existed. I don’t like hypotheticals, which is why I called it a half-baked idea. This person also thinks said Aryans are the most alpha baddest of them all. Again, this commenter doesn’t know how they were, as there isn’t much written about them and they haven’t left much of a legacy either. So it’s speculation.

        Second, he/she calls the British effeminate. They’re not. They conquered much of the earth at some point, not a long time ago either. However it’s true the Muslims are taking over in the UK, as they are doing everywhere in Europe, and soon here. With that no one argues, which is why I said the liberals in western countries are helping the Muslims immigrate.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 9:39 pm Anonymous

        The Brits have their two types – their Eloi are the “Pub School” crowd, and are quite effeminate (gawblessim, the confusing sh¡t they do to London women had me knee deep in grateful women for the time I was there), and their Morlocks are the Geezers, and those folks will knock your block off.

        Geezers can be quite strong, boisterous, rowdy, and violent. In other words, I like them.

        I think it’s been like this in the UK for a long time, as most British wars through the ages seem to have been fought by English aristocrat fops nominally in charge of troupes of bloodthirsty Celts, Picts and Vikings. Even to this day it is much the same, look at the SAS – they are mostly Scottish (trust a Celt to hump a ruck and split a skull).

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 6:57 pm Anonymous

        Nothing in my original post was meant to drive the reader to an Aryan über Alles frame, Tyrone.

        Move along.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 4:25 pm Tyrone

        Aryans exist, they are indo-Iranians. Iran means land of the Aryans and the name comes from the Ayran tribe of Turkomen.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 6:41 pm Lily

        Here we go again. Aryans is a myth, maybe based on truth, maybe not. We have no actual proof since said Aryans left nothing in terms of a legacy like other ancient culture did, such as the Romans or the Greeks.

        Using Persia calling itself Iran is not proof of Aryan existence.
        Show me concrete proof, not some nation changing its name to a myth it thinks belong to it.

        Too much reading of those n-NZ websites, eh? I don’t believe a word that comes from those sources.

        LikeLike


      • on February 20, 2013 at 1:56 pm Tyrone

        Lily:

        I thought you were smarter than this diatribe of yours.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan

        In Indian/Sanskrit literatureIn Sanskrit and related Indic languages, Arya refers to one who does Noble deeds . Āryāvarta (Sanskrit: आर्यावर्त, “abode of the Aryans”) is a name for Northern India in classical Sanskrit literature. The Manu Smriti (2.22) gives the name to “the tract between the Himalaya and the Vindhya ranges, from the eastern to the Western Sea”[20] The title of Arya was used with various modifications throughout the Indian Subcontinent. Kharavela, the Emperor of Kalinga around 1 BCE is referred as an Arya in the Hatigumpha inscriptions of the Khandagiri–Udaigiri cave complex in Bhubaneswar, Orissa. The Gurjara Pratihara rulers in the tenth century was entitled as Maharajadhiraja of Āryāvarta (‘the lord of great kings of the land of the Aryans’).[21] Various Indian religions, chiefly Hinduism, Jainism and Buddhism use the term Arya as an epithet of honour and it occurs as such in their religious texts and groups such as the Arya Samaj.

        In the Ramayana and Mahabharata, Arya is used as an honorific for many characters including Hanuman and Ravana.

        Indo-European language throughout Europe and the Middle East 500 BCE.[edit] In Iranian literatureUnlike the several meanings connected with ārya- in Old Indic, the Old Iranian term has solely an ethnic meaning.[22][23] That is in contrast to Indian usage, in which several secondary meanings evolved, the meaning of ar- as a self-identifier is preserved in Iranian usage, hence the words “Iran”/”Iranian” themselves. Iranian airya meant and means “Iranian”, and Iranian anairya [13][15] meant and means “Un-Iranian”.Arya may also be found as an ethnonym in Iranian languages, e.g., Alan/Persian Iran and Ossetian Ir/Iron[15]

        The name Iran, Iranian is itself equivalent to Aryan, where Iran means “land of the Aryans,”[6][13][13][15][23][24][25][26] and has been in use since Sassanid times

        LikeLike


  53. on February 15, 2013 at 4:40 pm askjoe

    So many historians here. Isn’t the violence in the Balkans a foreshadowing of what will happen across the West as our new Islamic Somali overlords get a little too stabby?

    LikeLike


  54. on February 15, 2013 at 4:50 pm Just passing through

    As a white southerner and long-time reader of this blog (and its predecessor), I’ve always found these race and immigration discussions amusing.

    We have some rather aggressive Nordic blood– descendants of normans, anglo-scandinavians, and scots-irish. We seem to do just fine keeping the dark hordes at bay, just as we’ve done for the past 500 years or so.

    LikeLike


  55. on February 15, 2013 at 5:04 pm Stuki

    Rather than Scandinavians having been somehow genetically altered (by disappearing Viking genes or whatever), a much more obvious explanation is that the traits which constitutes alpha today, is pretty much diametrically opposed to those of a millennium ago.

    If push were to come to shove, Scandinavians would still punch well above their weight in martial matters. Look at their results in sports. And, despite their seeming softness, they still kill more game per capita than other Western countries. As well as possessing guns at a rate only exceeded by Americans. They’re not uniformly a bunch of weaklings. Heck, even their feminist women aren’t weaklings. And, by (the admittedly pathetic) standards of Europe, they’re even reasonably fertile.

    Today, being alpha means being a chick with a dick. To prefer (and be adept at) verbal subterfuge. Of vanity displays. Of “playing the system well”, where the system is one where spoils are distributed by “someone powerful” (aka traditional alpha roles).

    There is no indication that the Vikings were ever particularly good at that. And neither are Scandinavians today. Instead of making grand public displays of themselves like Michael Moore and, like a woman, looking to bask in the attention it brings them, the Vikings just picked up a sword and swung it at someone. Anyone. Without much more ado than that. As did their modern day descendant, Anders Breivik. And while he may be somewhat ex Scandinavian center as men goes, he didn’t develop in a vacuum. Which indicates that, when things do go pear shaped, rather than tying to garner attention and “fame” by organizing “million white dads’ march” or similar displays of vanity, there are some of them that will simply do something meaningful about it.

    Contemporary alpha males are of a similar disposition as alpha males in Rome’s late stages. With very little in common with neither Vikings, Lonesome Riders in the West, Pushtun tribesmen, nor Somali pirates/revolutionaries. “Sitting poolside”, while alpha by today’s standards, is a losing strategy when those currently deemed betas wield swords, or, as Breivik, rifles; and have a Viking attitude about what constitutes their proper use.

    LikeLike


  56. on February 15, 2013 at 5:17 pm Rus

    Oh, by the way: There are 3000 new laws and regulations made each year in Denmark, and something like 70% or more of them comes straight from EU.

    It’s not just a single country problem, all of Europe is fucked by the central administration.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2013 at 5:40 pm Lily

      And yet the idiotic population likes the EU, in spite of all the useless regulations by these lefty bureaucrats, what do you make of that? Can people be so lethargic?

      In the US, the amount of rules, laws, and regulations could sink a ship. It’s too much. This regulation epidemic seems to be the curse of all Western countries run by hordes of lefties.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2013 at 6:21 pm Rus

        What I make of it is that it’s time to abandon ship. Move somewhere else and start over. There is no other long term solution.

        Peace makes people soft and stupid, and we are in the longest period of peace in history right now. When the war comes (not if, peace is always a temporary situation) we will lose. For all our viking ancestry, Scandinavia is just flat out too small to do anything of consequence on the military front and Sweden is completely fucked even by todays standards.

        America is fucked too. The debt is too high to pay even the interest on the loans, meaning the debt will keep growing endlessly until something breaks. When the state runs out of money and all the blacks and spics on the public teat suddenly have their money cut off, they will riot. The white portion of the states could theoretically handle this if they were united, but they are busy with infighting. It’s the end of the world as we know it, quite literally. Time to find a new world to live in.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 2:41 pm Lily

        “What I make of it is that it’s time to abandon ship. Move somewhere else and start over. There is no other long term solution.”

        But run where? Every country on earth is fucked. There is no New World left, or a frontier to further push our borders. If we had the technology, theoretically we could move to another planet like Mars or even a body like the moon, create an atmosphere and build cites with a select group who thinks like us, but this is the stuff of fantasy and science fiction not yet available. Short of that, there is nowhere to go. Some wealthy Americans are moving to Asia, to places like Singapore and Hong Kong, which are supposedly business friendly. However, just like bedding those Asian women is a consolation prize (per Flavia), the same is moving to these places. There was no civilization better than ours, while it lasted. Literally there is nowhere to go. No other place would do.

        “When the state runs out of money and all the blacks and spics on the public teat suddenly have their money cut off, they will riot. The white portion of the states could theoretically handle this if they were united, but they are busy with infighting. It’s the end of the world as we know it, quite literally. Time to find a new world to live in.”

        Prophetic words, indeed! It’s probably going to happen almost exactly as you describe it. But unlike the days of old, this time we have nowhere to go. Would our civilization became Mad Max-like?

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2013 at 5:18 pm n/a

        It’s good to see someone mention war, the most important thing there is. People can chatter about this or that political or cultural outrage, but the cause of the current western decadence is The Long Peace, an anomalous period brought about by American superpower and the threat of nuclear exchange.

        A few things to note. The next war will be a great power war, resource-based, and feature limited and devastating nuclear exchanges. The Chinese will not hesitate to nuke American carriers in the Taiwan Straits, and these boiling American boys and girls will force the hand of even Hillary if she makes it for 8.

        The subsequent detonations will completely change the world, but the USA is in a *uniquely* good position with respect to geography and resource wealth. We will win this terrible World War, but you may have to source your more effete beans from a city other than Seattle.

        People who believe a war like this “can’t happen” are everywhere among the feminized intelligentsia, even on a board like this, and they are extraordinarily stupid.–

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2013 at 1:34 am Rus

        If we are talking consolation prizes, then the entire PUA lifestyle is one giant consolation prize. That picture of Mystery and his slut going for a walk with their baby says it all. People like that can’t raise a new generation of worthwhile people.

        As for where, pick a place that suits you. Whatever you think of your country now, in not too many years it most certainly will not be the best in the world.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2013 at 1:00 pm Big Game Hunter

        There’s no place left to go. And besides, I like it here. I think I’ll keep the place. I’m not the only one who thinks this way. Not all of us are just gonna lift up our hands and surrender like a bunch of girls.

        As for the war, maybe there will be one. Maybe there won’t be a surrender. I like to hope so. I just hope we can avoid the whole war business, because killing folks is a shitty business. If the war comes, against whom? If pushed that far, why would “we” be the ones who lose? Tell me that.

        The war I imagine in my head as the most likely scenario (of the ones where there even is a war about this business, there will surely be other wars about other business) is really quite a simple scenario. Let’s take a country. Let’s say the Swedes finally get tired of their multiculturality, and want to opt right the hell out. By this time, the rest of the world will be a in sorry state as well, and even America won’t have the resources or political will to go play World Police to some Scandinavian backwater. At worst, they’ll throw some economic sanctions and stuff like that, and nobody will care worth a damn, because the multiculturality itself is a million times worse on the economy. It will start by closing up the borders and giving strong financial incentives for the multiculturality to pick up and go home. It will be a combination of the carrot and the stick: take this money and leave, because if you stay, the social security is closed to you. Some will go, some will not. If there’s going to be a war, what kind? Whites (or some large part of them, with the multiculturalist quislings choosing the other team or too scared to do anything) against the multiculturality element? How the hell could the whites ever manage to lose? What are the multiculties going to do? Suddenly develop such superior fighting skill as they haven’t even once displayed in the entire history of humanity? Yeah, sure, I believe that. They will certainly lose. There’s no possibility for effective guerrilla warfare for them in an environment where their very physical appearance betrays who they are. There’s no place to hide that the “natives” wouldn’t know a million times better than they. The only even remote chance of winning that they have, once such a war is somehow started, is that some massively powerful outside party interferes. Let’s think on that, shall we. Who would it be? The Russians? No bloody way. For once I can see a war coming where the Russians will actually be our allies, and not ones of convenience but ones of ideology. The Chinese? I think they might be able to think of something more profitable to do – like selling their military equipment to us. The Americans? About the only option even remotely credible. But it would take more than some operation Allied Force part 2. It would take sending American soldiers on the ground, shooting at whites who don’t really have anything against them. From the American fighting men I know, they wouldn’t like such a job, at all. I don’t see it happening. As far as the rest, sure some minor countries can make noises and try to slip some jihadists and resources to the multiculturalists, but it would never be enough.

        No, if there’s a war, it’s going to be one we win. The problem is, folks might surrender without a fight. Which is, it seems, the more likely scenario. Then it’s balkanization for the whole of Europe, and later US of A as well. Good times – not.

        LikeLike


  57. on February 16, 2013 at 6:31 pm Arred Wade

    More likely, the process of urbanization feminized their men by forcing more claustrophobic social environments upon them. Engaging the network of casual relationships that surround you in a city requires significant social skill even of the most easy-going people-pleaser — to assert status without pissing people off is a real feat. Much easier to pick up a lisp and become a polite and unimposing beta.

    LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2013 at 7:32 pm Anonymous

      http://www.returnofkings.com/2090/how-black-america-has-predicted-our-future

      LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2013 at 8:07 pm Arred Wade

        If you liked that article, you’re going to love this Bureau of Labor Statistics report from the 60’s: http://www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/history/moynchapter1.htm

        LikeLike


  58. on February 18, 2013 at 10:41 am Anonymous

    Here are two excellent quotes I’ve found that are very relevant to the topics at hand. Read and ponder.

    ——————————————–
    Quote: Originally Posted by Breitling
    In America…Yes.

    I’ve been around to different parts of the world and of all of the whites around the world, there is probably no weaker of a white man than the white American city male. Southern and rural men tend to be different though.

    Quite simply, more bravery. Stand up for your beliefs…Assert them through whatever means necessary. Be more pragmatic and objective. When I came to the United States, I was shocked by how so many men were essentially the slaves of their woman…buying them things, doing their chores, driving them around, and breaking down into tears when she left them. There’s something about American white males that is so fundamentally flawed, but it’s not in their nature, it’s something they’ve conditioned to be. They’ve been conditioned to be weak and submissive. It’s unacceptable and if this country has any hope, it’s going to have to start with a white male cultural revolution of sorts.

    Often when the urban ones break out of it, it is by embracing an ethos of psychological abuse toward women (see “negative hits” and other psychological tips developed to help magazine-reading metrosexuals “get laid”).
    ——————————————-
    ” I think the basic problem is that a cultural revolt of American men could wreak major havoc to the Jewish/Zionist goals, because America is resource-rich, somewhat involving a voting mechanism, and has formal protections for speech and firearms ownership.

    Thus American men have to be psychologically dominated, impoverished, and/or distracted by discount sex at every turn in order for the current paradigm to progress.

    The rural men are by and large made insecure through economic means, and thereby easily psychologically dominated. The urban men are bought of culturally and socially through cheap sex.

    The sex is made cheap through grooming of American girls (via media working on both them and their mothers, and amplified in schools) to adopt attitudes and habits traditionally (and for good rational reasons) associated with prostitutes. “

    LikeLike


  59. on February 18, 2013 at 7:31 pm Anonymous

    http://www.returnofkings.com/2090/how-black-america-has-predicted-our-future

    LikeLike


  60. on February 19, 2013 at 2:02 pm Alfa 1

    The Best Germans died in WWII…forget about the rest. A bunch of tight jean wearing ill tempered vaginas.

    LikeLike


  61. on February 19, 2013 at 10:05 pm Lars Viker

    Media stooges and apparatchiks mean little, they just get a lot of expose. Actually, the Scandinavian countries are alpha utopias. Never has so much hot, tight pussy been available for alphas for so little effort. You used to at least have to take care of the women you fucked if you were lucky enough to get them, but now women have their own jobs and also leech off the betas and omegas, so the alphas get it for free. Some alphas look and act (very) masculine, others don’t. Bear in mind most masculine guys are quite happy just screwing a bunch of goregeous women with no effort or commitment and living safely in a modern society. They just shut up, play along with the insanity and laugh at it all. Also keep in mind that Nordics are the tallest and most muscular peoples on earth, so while they may have some feminine traits, those traits are often weighed down in person by muscle/size.

    The problem is, if you’re not an alpha, you’re nothing. Everyone else loses. Betas get uglier GFs/wives, omegas and gammas grow in number and frustration. Which means the whole system isn’t sustainable for very long. Scandinavian men are naive, but there is a limit to how much even they can be fooled. And when the game is up, trust me, you don’t want to be around if you’re responsible.

    LikeLike


    • on February 20, 2013 at 12:32 am FuriousFerret

      With the most manly name on earth, I’m inclined to hear this man out.

      Are you friends with Max Powers?

      LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2013 at 8:14 am Lars Viker

        Naw, Max Powers is all talk and steroids, all bark and no bite. Sure, go ahead, ask me anything about game and sex relations in scandi countries (I’m from Norway myself, although I’ve been exciled for being too much of a badass, like the vikings who became Icelandics in the Viking age).

        LikeLike


  62. on February 20, 2013 at 1:03 am Lightning Round – 2013/02/20 « Free Northerner

    […] all the Vikings die off, leaving only the […]

    LikeLike


  63. on February 20, 2013 at 4:23 am C

    *hamsters overrunning the chataeu*

    conservative philo-semites are the anti-racists of the right, and they’re every bit as anti white.

    LikeLike


  64. on February 23, 2013 at 2:16 am ve

    This post makes me feel like I owe it to my country to start giving a fake name and impregnating random bar sluts.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Captain John Charity… on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Ironsides on Tourette’s Game
    Bucky on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Roy on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Carlos Danger on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Roy on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Bucky on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Mr.Correcto on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    Bob on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
    GB on Cesar Sayoc, “White Male…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Cesar Sayoc, "White Male" (& Deep State Updates)
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Manifest Depravity
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: