• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Alpha Male Membership Has Its Privileges
Reader Mailbag: Goosing The Gunt »

CPAC In A Nutshell

March 15, 2013 by CH

Ever have a girl try to copy a porn move on you that she once saw, except it was one of those disgusting porn moves, like spitting for lube or gag drooling during a blowjob, that no normal man really likes?

Yeah, that’s what comes to mind reading about CPAC speakers and attendees dancing to the leftoids’ big tent tune.

Look, fudgePACers, you can yap all day about dropping social issues and appealing to Hispanics’ “natural conservatism”, but the unavoidable fact is that you either stood by or abetted the traitors as the doors to the country were swung wide open to permanent demographic replacement. No matter how far you bend over, you will never outcompete the leftoids on the appeal of their leftoid message to two giant underclasses and one giant hypocritical status whoring gated community class. So you may as well begin the process of carving out a new party and starting from scratch.

PS A slow and steady blowjob, lots of soft lip but with no phony gonzo drooling, is really sexy.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Culture, Current Events, Tool Time | 202 Comments

202 Responses

  1. on March 15, 2013 at 1:17 pm Dr. Eric Stratton

    Where the fuck did the spitting thing come from? It’s just bizarre. And the less said about a bj that might end in your cock being covered in vomit, the better. But I’m sure both will totally work this time around for the CPAC geniuses.

    LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 3:25 pm thwack

      If your girl is not a whore, the cheap whore routine is a turn on; blow job while driving, spittin, jerkin your dick like she’s shaking dice… LOL

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 3:34 pm Dr. Eric Stratton

        I’ve no arguments against the freaky, I just prefer a less theatrical approach.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 5:26 pm Realmatt

        FUCK YES

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 7:16 pm Nicole

        :: taking notes :: “Urrrurrrh. Maourrrurrrh.”

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 10:23 pm Keanu

        which stand up album is that from?

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 5:48 pm Anonymous

      A little drool when when she pulls off the knob is ok, especially when she goes back down to lick it up.

      LikeLike


      • on March 17, 2013 at 3:49 am santa666

        This CPACer knows how to do it rite: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/03/17/article-0-18B6D0EE000005DC-361_634x417.jpg

        LikeLike


      • on March 17, 2013 at 3:52 am santa666

        I mean just look at that grip, and that vacuum-hold lip-lock.

        mmmmmm….I bet she’s tonguing the back of that straw.

        LikeLike


  2. on March 15, 2013 at 1:18 pm Anon

    I haven’t cum from a BJ since I was 19, a sophomore in college (she swallowed). I find women can never avoid a little bit of teeth and it plain doesn’t feel to good after a while. So I always stop them and roll them over.

    LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 4:43 pm Customer Service

      Let me guess, you’re cut?

      LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 5:52 pm Anonymous

      My favorite thing to do during a bj is when the chick tells you to let her know when you are gonna so she can back of, you say yeah sure sweetie, then you hold the back of her head as you blow it down her throw.

      “Sorry sweetie, your so good I couldn’t stop.” *instant swoon, all forgiven*

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 6:14 pm Mike in Texas

        Yeah but the current FB likes for me to cum when she sucks me. Big difference.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 10:24 pm Keanu

        What % of girls swallow? Your estimate.

        It’s funny, some act like swallowing is clearly the most logical things to do. Others are like ‘what? Noooooo way would I do that. Disgusting.’

        LikeLike


      • on March 19, 2013 at 1:42 am Anonymous

        all girls swallow for the right guy the question is what percentage of guys do they swallow for
        kind of like chick that was like for me to fuck her in ass I would have to jump through all these hoops and it would have to be just so well since she brought it up I knew she wanted it so I told her I would only do it when she begged for it
        eventually she did beg me to do it and I didn’t have to jump though any hoops
        he he he

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 7:38 pm Whitehall

      I generally agree – BJs are foreplay and not all that great.

      Orgasms are best when there is lots of large muscle involvement – I like it rough and sweaty.

      Besides, there’s just something so RIGHT and natural and cumming up against her cervix. Any other orifice is just a misplaced load.

      Customer Service’ remark implying that there’s a subjective deference in feeling between cut and uncut is interesting – first I’ve heard it. It would take some one who got an adult circumcision to give us first hand experience.

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 10:04 pm thwack

        Anybody know what the world map of cut vs uncut men looks like?

        In other words, what are women around the world used to?

        I think in some African tribes you get circked at 13

        Yikes!

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 9:16 pm Zombie Shane

      I find women can never avoid a little bit of teeth and it plain doesn’t feel to good after a while.

      Best blow job in my life was from a surgery resident who is now a rather famous plastic surgeon.

      All tongue on the underside and no teeth whatsoever.

      But I’m with you, man – teeth hurt so bad in a blow job that I have to start fantasizing about really nasty shit (like lesbians fisting each other) in order to cum in a teether’s mouth.

      LikeLike


  3. on March 15, 2013 at 1:25 pm RappaccinisDaughter

    OK, I know a lot of you think that women have nothing to contribute to this discussion (and I understand why), but this is one thing that I am certain I can help you to understand:

    Sometimes it is virtually impossible not to drool a little. If the drooling bothers you, help her to avoid the gagging that triggers it by not pushing on her head. Seriously, please don’t push on her head. Part of the art and science of delivering a nice blajinsky is being able to time everything to avoid triggering the gag reflex. If you push on our heads, you screw up our rhythm, we gag, and then–boom! Drool.

    If there’s something you want us to do (faster, slower, whatever), take us by the hair and tug gently to guide us that way. Or just say something.

    And as long as we’re on the subject of blowjob etiquette, don’t forget to let us know when you’re summitting. Tap us on the shoulder or something.

    LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 1:33 pm whorefinder

      Why are you talking with your mouth full? Back to work, whore!

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 1:44 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        You know the rule: I’m not going to smile like a doughnut until you put your clown mask on.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 2:10 pm whorefinder

        Bitch, the first rule of blowing mac-daddy-whorefinder is that THERE ARE NO RULES.

        The second rule is no spitting allowed.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 4:51 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Agreed, spitting is rude. If I don’t like him well enough to swallow, I don’t like him enough to be giving him a blowie.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 5:27 pm q

        So if you like someone enough to force yourself into giving him a BJ you don’t need to be afraid that you won’t be able to swallow?

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 5:39 pm whorefinder

        Good girl. Here’s a cookie.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 5:49 pm q

        What if you swallow and then throw up? This would be even more rude. I’m always afraid that this will happen to me, because I vomit very easily, I can’t believe I’m so sensitive.

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 1:34 pm Nomennovum

      Summiting? I prefer the term “eye-plastering.” The tell is not a tap but a lack of clear vision. At that point, I’d also recommend not trying to breath through your nose.

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 4:26 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        I suppose “summitting” is an overly prissy term for this particular lazy Friday afternoon. I’ll try to modulate my vocabulary choices more carefully…

        …speaking of which, a couple of spurts of throat-yogurt to the eye will result in her looking like she’s got pinkeye for several hours. Not cute.

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 1:45 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

      Meritorious contribution, @RD, and I’m all for respect that is mutual. However, I can’t think of a GOOD reason the illustrious woman needs to be forewarned about the nectar of the gods. It is in that moment of delivery that quality handling feeeeeels the best, and these are feeeeeelings that actually count, since they are based on mutual respect and benefits of real world significance. 🙂

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 1:54 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Good question, Reality Doug, and I’ll tell you why: She needs to know to hold her breath. Of all the things a girl wants to have go down the “wrong chute,” that is at the very end of the list. That’s a good 10 minutes of coughing and choking right there. It’s even worse than getting it in the eye.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 2:44 pm gunslingergregi

        practice makes perfect

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 2:54 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

        A girl blowing cum out her nose is truly a sight to behold!

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 2:59 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        I believe that’s called the “angry dragon,” Swag So Fresh. And the adjective is well-chosen. Ever blown soda out of your nose? Gentleman’s relish out the nose is even less pleasant.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 3:27 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

        Pleasant or not, it’s always unforgettable. She’ll never forget the first time she choked on my cum, and I make it a habit of keeping my phone close-by to immortalize the moment.

        I may never fuck her again, but if I do, then I know I’m dealing with a broad who enjoys mixing pain with pleasure. That’s the kind of broad who gets off on being used and abused by an alpha male, and I sure as hell ain’t gonna let her slip away without slippin’ one in her.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 3:34 pm whorefinder

        . Ever blown soda out of your nose? Gentleman’s relish out the nose is even less pleasant.
        —It is a bitch’s job to bear whatever her man gives her.

        Even cum out her nose.

        RAPE!

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 3:36 pm Big Bill

        You really are a piece of work! 😉

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 3:46 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Gahhh, Swag So Fresh. Just talking to you is making me long for a neti pot. And two fingers of Balvenie 12.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 3:01 pm gunslingergregi

        ownage i may have a chick do that lol

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 3:28 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

        One cock, one load, three holes filled. WINNING!

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 3:46 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

        +1 Good point. Now to find a chic with aspirations or skills. I prefer aspirations. Many shoulder taps to cum. lulz You getting the hang of it, baby?!

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 6:18 pm Mike in Texas

        I always tell her when I am cumming. The current FB sucks harder then.

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 1:45 pm Factory

      So….all those women that GUSH when you force their head down on da cocka don’t exist? Hey, I know a lot of women hate it when guys do that, probably because most guys (apparently) do this 12 seconds after lips touch glans…but I’ve had WAY more than one woman soak her panties when her head gets pushed to the base and held there a while.

      So…differnt strokes maybe?

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 4:21 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Hey, if she likes it, that’s great, but in my experience, and in that of the women I’ve talked to about it, it’s a really good way to get her to involuntarily unlunch. Even those of us with Zen-like mastery of our gag reflexes can get triggered by that kind of surprise.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 5:48 pm JironGhrad

        Those are “women” who dig auto-erotic asphyxiation too… except if you go that route seriously… they don’t know when to quit and you have to stay totally in control. It’s like that old song we used to sing in elementary school, “Suffocation, the game I like to play”

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 10:26 am gunslingergregi

        lol

        LikeLike


  4. on March 15, 2013 at 1:28 pm Myxomatosis

    I actually love when a girl has drool snaking down her mouth, her neck, and onto the floor when she’s ferociously blowing me.

    LikeLike


  5. on March 15, 2013 at 1:29 pm swag2008

    Prudes! Hot chick can drool on my meat all day

    LikeLike


  6. on March 15, 2013 at 1:32 pm whorefinder

    Yeah, combine that with the fact that every other movie has anal, and every fourth movie heavily promotes bestiality–sorry, black males and non-black females–or else tries to term gangbangs as “threesomes”, and I think the porn industry is being hijacked by some leftist tards.

    I mean, the literally changed the name of one porn website from “my daughter’s dating a nigger!” to “my daughter’s darting a black guy” because of p.c. pressure. That’s right,a website designed for those self-hating, self-castrating faggots who want to be cuckholded by subhumans had to bow to p.c. pressure, despite the fact that the draw for such losers IS the fact that some human girl is getting railed by a 3/5ths.

    However, it is STILL hilarious that femtards worship the male porn star James Deen, and yet all of his movies involve him slapping women around and basically acting completely un-p.c. to them. I give the skinny little dude props, he’s hacking their systems.

    LikeLike


    • on March 17, 2013 at 11:11 am feministx

      “However, it is STILL hilarious that femtards worship the male porn star James Deen,”

      OMG THANK YOU!!!!

      I was reading the original post about people doing bizarre stupid shit they found in porn, and I was thinking “right, all the stuff I see in porn is either bizarre and grotesque or very mundane.” And I remembered that I have only seen one or two male porn stars that I thought were sexy. I wished I could remember who they both were as I only had the image in my head.

      Fortunately, I actually bothered to google the guy you just mentioned, James Deen, and he is indeed one of the two male porn stars I ever felt an attraction to. Now I can look at him whenever I want. Yeah!!!

      LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 12:36 am Dave

        So you like seeing women get spit on and choked out and all that? I’m not a feminist and all and that shit disgusts me and I think that it’s totally disrespectful towards women (obviously). What gives? Why do feminists say that normal guys who don’t get off on abusing women during sex are evil rapists and then that the ones who really do do it are good? You’re all sick.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 11:51 am feministx

        Yes, I think it’s fun looking. I’ve never done anything like most of that, but I think I’d be open to trying it.

        It looks totally consentual and the guy’s face is in the videos, so I do not find it degrading to women. I mean, gay guys do that stuff to each other all the time in porn. Sometimes women are shown doing that stuff to men too. It’s not about sexism.

        I will point out that I am not particularly aroused by the whips and chains bit. I just like how the guy looks and his general attitude. If I were to sleep with him, I would prefer to do it without the bondage stuff and public sex aspect.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 12:19 pm goodspeed

        lol at all the rationalizations.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 1:03 pm q

        I don’t watch porn, but this James Deen has a blog and I have to admit he’s quite handsome.

        ps – your butt is beautiful and very sexy ❤

        LikeLike


    • on March 18, 2013 at 4:57 pm Lily

      “Yeah, combine that with the fact that every other movie has anal, and every fourth movie heavily promotes bestiality–sorry, black males and non-black females–or else tries to term gangbangs as “threesomes”, and I think the porn industry is being hijacked by some leftist tards.”

      That’s why I hate porn; it doesn’t do anything for me. I don’t like girl-on girl action, cuz it’s boring and not sexy in the least, as women fucking other women doesn’t do anything for me. Anal is not exciting and even gross if you take into consideration all the diseases being passed right there and then. Black male-White female is not pretty to watch and doesn’t turn me on either. The only type I like is a pretty white female with a masculine white guy getting it on for real, or at least make it look real. So that means that most porn is a waste of time, if not highly immoral. However, I don’t find man-woman having sex as an immoral act. The other scenarios just feel immoral. So if I needed to watch it with my man, I would, just as long as it’s male-female action.

      However, if you’re having a great sex life who needs to watch porn? Porn is for people who are not satisfied within their relationship, or are in between relationships and need something to get them off. I don’t get the need for porn for people who are truly happy with their sex lives. There are many lonely people out there and porn gets them through. 50 Shades of Gray and the like act the same way for females. If they are unsatisfied with the masculinity and sexuality of their man, they will start to fantasize about that other man they always longed for, who will satisfy their darkest needs. Women in love and in lust don’t fantasize about other men.

      LikeLike


  7. on March 15, 2013 at 1:35 pm AlephMale

    I’m getting enough political debate from my life-partner right now(she’s LIbertarian, I’m an Authoritarian Technocrat), so I’ll just list some other shit I hate in porn films:
    -Focusing on the guy’s O-face
    -Facials – should in be a rare treat and staple of humiliation porn, not the industry standard. I’d like to see more variety(creampies, shooting onto her chest, et cetera)
    -A cameraman who won’t shut the fuck up.
    -Excessive moaning

    LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 6:51 pm Unending Improvement

      “A cameraman who won’t shut the fuck up.”

      Abso-fucking-lutely. I especially hate when the cameraman starts playing with a girl’s tits. I don’t want to see some dudes disembodied hand.

      “Excessive moaning”

      If it sounds “natural’, then I really don’t mind, but when a girl does that exaggerated moaning, count me the hell out.

      The rest of those I don’t care about, as I don’t watch porn with dudes.

      LikeLike


    • on March 17, 2013 at 9:37 am Zombie Shane

      A cameraman who won’t shut the fuck up.

      The Jews – Yahweh bless their little hearts – just can’t resist the urge to insert themselves into The Narrative.

      LikeLike


    • on March 18, 2013 at 12:44 am Dave

      They also use really cheap cameras compared to a normal movie or even tv show and that’s part of why porn comes off so smutty.

      LikeLike


  8. on March 15, 2013 at 1:42 pm q

    ‘PS A slow and steady blowjob, lots of soft lip but with no phony gonzo drooling, is really sexy.’

    ♥♥

    LikeLike


  9. on March 15, 2013 at 1:45 pm popups

    am i to understand that the blowjob feels better when it’s less wet?

    [CH: Spitting is mostly done for handjobs. Drooling is just unnecessary and gross.]

    LikeLike


  10. on March 15, 2013 at 1:46 pm Anti-Blue Pill

    MEH to each there own on bj etiquette, i like mines wet and dirty.

    on the subject of cpac i agree it has been nothing more than a circle jerk fest
    of moralist big gov repubs types with sometimes a genuine article as speaker so i don’t knock it completely.

    LikeLike


  11. on March 15, 2013 at 1:52 pm Whitehall

    Indeed, the Republicans blew it a couple of decades ago. While the Democrats were activating their “swamp the country with new welfare voters,” a small faction of the Republicans who wanted cheap labor (mostly Westerners) teamed up with the Democrats to open the gates. I remember Orin Hatch (R-Utah) teaming with Ted Kennedy awhile back.

    The problem now is how to recover from those earlier mistakes. Going hard-line “deport ’em all” will just piss off those who don’t want the grandmother kicked off Medicaid and sent back to the Old Country. Out-welcoming the Democrats is a loser, as noted.

    Anyone with CONSTRUCTIVE criticism on how to solve the political dilemma?

    LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 1:54 pm corvinus

      Going hard-line “deport ‘em all” will just piss off those who don’t want the grandmother kicked off Medicaid and sent back to the Old Country.

      Wrong. That’s only what the media tells you. Hardliners on immigration, if they lose, lose due to factors other than their being hardliners on immigration.

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 2:20 pm whorefinder

        Corvinus is right: staying hardline is what helps you win AND garners you respect.

        Remember that women do not have a fixed point of right and wrong—it is literally, for them, whatever the group decides. Given that leftists are overwhelmingly either women or else they are female-minded (i.e. sackless effeminate fags), when you put a hardline opinion out there and hold fast to it, you move their goalposts for them. After all, the most important thing to the female mind is agreement of the group and not right/wrong.

        You can see this dynamic in a group argument. Next time at a cocktail party, whenever some topic comes up, take an extreme position—it doesn’t have to be political at all. For example, it could be that X TV show or movie—which the people there universally love—absolutely sucks. Stake out about five points of argument to back you up, laugh counter point of views down, and cut off anyone who brings up a coherent counter-argument—and, above all, NEVER give up your extreme position.

        Watch as the women and weak men there slowly come around and move towards your position. Their minds and souls are that pliable.

        Hell, it can even be a show you LIKE. In fact, the bets ending to the entire argument is, “Nah, I was just kidding. I actually think the show/movie is good.” Watch those heads (and hamsters) spin!

        As Rush Limbaugh is fond of saying, hardcore conservatism–and harsh language and action–works. The anti-left fails when it goes to the middle and compromises–McCain, Romney, etc. But bring out some brass balls—Reagan–and you gain respect.

        Remember: the only white guys that black toughs actually respect are the open, aggressive racists who fight back and try to put them back in Jim Crow. Everyone else, to them, is a pussy to be pushed around.

        Manliness works.

        Compromisers never conquer countries. Genghis Khan does.

        Also, RAPE!

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 6:54 pm Unending Improvement

        Reagan also supported policies modern conservatives consider “liberal”.

        The problem with modern Conservatism is that it’s just a kneejerk reaction.

        “Lower taxes!” “Cut spending!” “Keep government out of healthcare!”

        Instead of proposing new ideas, all they do is go for the opposite of whatever the Democrats propose.

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 8:20 am whorefinder

        Reagan also supported policies modern conservatives consider “liberal”.

        —Pointless drivel.

        The problem with modern Conservatism is that it’s just a kneejerk reaction.
        —To evil.

        Instead of proposing new ideas, all they do is go for the opposite of whatever the Democrats propose.
        —Yawn. Opposing stupidity does not mean you have to propose your own.

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 7:58 pm Unending Improvement

        Yes, real constructive rebuttal there.

        If anything though I’m a reactionary.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 12:46 am Dave

        So in other words what sucks about conservatives is that they aren’t liberals

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 7:16 pm corvinus

        I honestly think CH should make this post a blog entry. Well done.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 5:56 pm Lily

        “After all, the most important thing to the female mind is agreement of the group and not right/wrong.”

        100% true. But not just females, most liberals and lefties are like that. They can’t think in terms of right and wrong. They also get unhinged if you speak in such terms calling you judgmental, racist, sexist, backward, old-fashioned, etc… because to them everything is relative prompting them to eschew everything traditional, even the notions of right and wrong, good and bad.

        “Compromisers never conquer countries. Genghis Khan does.”

        Exactly right, which is why we never win wars anymore. We never insist on the complete vanquishing of the defeated. This works in politics too. All this compromising in Washington, even during Republican admirations, ruined the conservative cause. Look at Bush II, how much caving in to democrats he did. He would have been a great president had he stuck to his guns. As Chaney said of him at the end, ‘he ended up being just another politician that didn’t stick to his promises or convictions’. That’s why his 2nd term was such a disaster and why Barak Obama was able to use it in his favor against McCain. Hell, Bush didn’t even defend himself against Katrina attacks. He should have unleashed a political war to shut up the lies and propaganda against him by the Democrats. Instead, he listened to his half-feminist librarian wife and Carl Rove who told him to keep quiet and ignore the criticism. Recently, Carl Rove acknowledged they made many mistakes. Hence, you must destroy your opponent if you want to win.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 2:55 pm peckerwood

        didn’t we just read a story the other day about how exposure to illegals makes white democrats vote republican? I bet it would also work on some black democrats as well. So, the gOP is caving on immigration why? Oh right, because heartiste is right, they’re totally buying into the bullshit the leftardists are selling.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 4:18 pm whorefinder

        didn’t we just read a story the other day about how exposure to illegals makes white democrats vote republican? I bet it would also work on some black democrats as well. So, the gOP is caving on immigration why? Oh right, because heartiste is right, they’re totally buying into the bullshit the leftardists are selling.

        —By the time they are exposed enough to make a change, it’ll be too late. It already is.

        Then they’ll just run to Canada and make the same mistakes.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 5:06 pm Hugh G. Rection

        The reality for the GOP is that to win without appeasing the “people of color” (not to be confused with the people of Colorado) they need most of the white vote, and even that strategy will not work in “majority minority” states.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 3:00 pm Lily

        Bingo!!! And most whites are liberals nowadays, so that’s why we can’t tilt elections in our favor anymore, as they vote with the minorities.

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 1:57 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      1. Make the rules for legal immigration from third-world countries the same as the ones from Europe.
      2. Erect a very high wall all the way across the southern border.
      3. At 10-foot intervals, post that Rolling Stone cover of Lena Dunham. In Spanish, the posters are labeled “America’s Hottest Woman.”
      4. Profit.

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 2:41 pm Glenn P

        You forgot… impeach Obama to ultimately get rid of the man with the magic executive order signing pen that seems to go against what all the people think in favor of his socialist agenda!

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 6:56 pm Unending Improvement

        No, the sad thing is I think the people do support his agenda, or at least those who bother to follow politics during elections at a minimum.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 5:33 pm fascinated

        Impeach him on what basis?

        LikeLike


      • on March 19, 2013 at 7:37 am thwack

        he’s nonwhite?

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 2:49 pm Corsair

        #3. Thread winner.

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 2:08 pm Scott

      Do we still frown on genocide? Just checking.

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 2:46 pm whorefinder

        Who? Whom?

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 2:09 pm Anti-Blue Pill

      Since it looks like the united states is headed for a single party democracy, i say be a trojan candidate. meaning campaign to get the votes from the welfare queens and what not, then govern the exact opposite,have the military as your ally to keep you in power as you reform this shit hole.

      LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 12:32 am frozenpie77

        I’ve thought about this same thing. A candidate could appeal to societal leeches for support, clearly act against their interest, then come back and make the same promises to them the next election and probably win again, simply because they want the possibility of actually getting their handouts.

        But I’d gladly take a Golden Dawn, American style.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 3:09 pm Lily

        “have the military as your ally to keep you in power as you reform this shit hole.”

        Thomas Sowell says we need a military coup to save this country from the liberals. Unfortunately, he’s right. Trouble is many in the military are also as liberal as they come, and I don’t mean the women and minorities. Look at all the serving generals, most of them are liberals, centrists, or slightly right off center. It’s hard to find one who is a true conservative. To many of them it’s just a career, not a real patriotic calling.

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 2:15 pm Stuki

      Get rid of Medicaid. Granma will be taken care of by her children and grandchildren. If even they can’t, or won’t do it; there sure ain’t no reason why I should do it. Nor an issue for “politics.”

      The “political dilemma” is solved by taking politics out of it. As soon as you accept that an area of life is to be governed by “politics”, you’re already too far down the slippery slope. All politics is, is some mechanism by which better connected others decide what to do with your life and the fruits of your labor. Keep it away from them, as best you can. Bitcoin! (had to say that..:) ) Tor. Darknet. Gold. Havala. Whatever.

      And, for f’s sake, don’t bloody compromise. No “I agree in principle, but, but..sometimes…..” Grandmothers dying of starvation in front of your Rolls Royce is a better alternative than third parties being forced to pick up her food tab. Good women would have enough well raised children that this is a non existing problem anyway. Nogood women are expendable.

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 2:41 pm Whitehall

        I once had a Asian contract engineer working for me. He drove an S-class Mercedes, lived in the hills of Berkeley, with views of the Golden Gate Bridge. His father was a prosperous businessman in Taiwan.

        He was moaning to me that his mother had come from Taiwan to life with him so that she could get free medical care off US taxpayers.

        I almost fired the asshole!

        So when Rubio and others claim that no one comes to the US to get welfare, that’s pure political bunk.

        As to building a fence, absolutely! We thought we had won that battle and the fence was being built but they lied to us.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 3:05 pm Anonymous

        As the current currency war heats up, more countries will fall to it, and immigration to the US will increase. Then the bullets will fly, and even more folks will immigrate to the US (and we’ll accept them as “refugees”, right?)

        The vast majority of those immigrants will want Section 8 housing, free medical (either through the emergency room or through Medicaid), etc. As soon as we can, we’ll give them the vote.

        Populate the country with people who require the Government in order to live.

        Overload the System. It’s the Cloward-Piven Strategy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy

        Then, if you are the folks doing this, you sit back and enjoy your solidified status as a Ruling Elite/Eloi/Philosopher King/President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho.

        When you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on Paul’s vote.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 4:00 pm Scott

        We need to bring back the guillotine or tar and feathers.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 5:44 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Other than Switzerland and Japan, there isn’t really a lot going on currency war wise.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 8:08 pm Anonymous

        Oh, really? Do tell.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 10:35 pm Anonymous

        Hugh, hope you noticed the news on Cyprus this weekend. And also the recent news on Germany telling the rest of the EU to fvck off. And the rumors of a MASSIVE bailout (>$1Tn) of Europe by our Fed (wtf, right?).

        The currency/money wars are worldwide, and in full swing. With currencies, it’s a massive race to the bottom, in an attempt to foist debt on everyone (and anyone) else. With money (different than currency, as the world is remembering now), it’s a race to amass as much as possible (see the gold acquisitions of China, Russia, etc., in the last several years, and especially since December).

        We are at war, and the wackiness is only going to intensify. The general population has just not noticed yet.

        ∞

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 10:45 pm Kate

        This is fascinating.

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 11:18 pm gunslingergregi

        i started reading the paper and uhh shit been going down there is war literally everywhere

        LikeLike


      • on March 17, 2013 at 10:43 am Anonymous

        Greg, we’re just getting started.

        ∞

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 8:03 pm Whitehall

      To answer my own question, Steve Sailer in Taki’s offers a suggestion. Since the Democrats are a coalition of groups, go about breaking up the coalition. He offers one example in that blacks and white and Asian gays don’t seem to have much common interests.

      Unions vs environmentalists? Crony capitalists vs. welfare moms? There should be wedge issues waiting to be exploited.

      I think that Rand Paul is on to something when he suggests a more libertarian approach to pushing back the nanny state. Social conservatives are feeling the pressure so they should see the wisdom in that.

      LikeLike


  12. on March 15, 2013 at 1:56 pm gunslingergregi

    PS A slow and steady blowjob, lots of soft lip but with no phony gonzo drooling, is really sexy.””””””’

    its fun to watch em puke sometimes

    LikeLike


  13. on March 15, 2013 at 1:57 pm Anonymous

    ¿Como se dice “Here I come to save the daaaaay!” en español?

    The Motto of the GOP.

    Pssst… that means that Mighty Mouse, is on the waaaay.

    ∞

    LikeLike


  14. on March 15, 2013 at 2:01 pm n/a

    I think we have the right to all varieties of cocksucking — don’t sell your cock short.

    Have her reapply lipstick halfway through.

    LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 2:56 pm gunslingergregi

      agreed

      LikeLike


  15. on March 15, 2013 at 2:09 pm Jason

    OT

    …but aren’t writers of romance novels the mental equivalents of alpha males?

    We imagine them to be piles of cetaceous estrogen dressed up in teddy-bear sweaters, gulping shots of straight half-and-half, sitting at their desktop computers and weeping tears of pure sexual frustration onto their pudgy handfat while typing that day’s four hundredth iteration of emotional confusion.

    But I’m not sure that’s necessarily true.

    To create those stories, these women must have killed their own hamsters. They must have zero illusions about feminine nature. They must know it, accept it, work with it. All so that they manipulate it on paper, day in, day out.

    I imagine a romance writers’ conference would actually be a GREAT place to toss back some Jameson’s and talk about how to pass shit tests, demonstrate SMV, compare alpha cad to beta dad, etc. In fact, I bet those women are even fans of this website.

    Can anybody else verify?

    LikeLike


    • on March 16, 2013 at 12:07 am cynthia

      I’d argue that quite a lot of these writers actually have out of control hamsters. Like the bitch wrote Eat Pray Love, or that retarded piece of crap, 50 Shades of Gray. No self-awareness there. At all. I’m sure there are some romance writers who understand real feminine desire, and some who may manipulate it just like you say, but quite a lot of that genre is pure, undiluted, female fantasy. Reality doesn’t enter into it at all. It’s all about catching the alpha male and then “civilizing” him with your love until he’s a perfect (beta, pussy, mangina, whatever) man. It’s all the stuff that actually turns us off in real life, but still reads well on the page.

      The rare book that doesn’t follow that kind of patterns seems to do so by accident. I think the industry’s changing a bit in regards to that, but it’s still nothing but unrealistic fantasies that don’t necessarily align with reality.

      (On another note, there is a place where you’re going to see characters acting out more feminine sexualities is in the m/m-homoerotica-for-straight-women genre. Which is quietly growing in popularity. It’s like the only way anyone can talk about what a woman really wants is if that desire is pushed onto a gay male and the female taken out of the equation completely. What that says about modern society, I have no idea. Maybe that modern women are so uncomfortable with their own innate natures because feminism, that the only way they can look at it is if there’s no actual woman involved, and thus, are not made to feel shameful about “giving in” to the “patriarchy’s sexual oppression”, or whatever. Don’t believe me? Ask a female acquaintance what she thought about Brokeback Mountain. Or google “slash”. And yes, I apologize for even mentioning this…)

      LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 12:23 pm Jason

        Eat Pray Love and 50 Shades are outliers.

        I was talking about the average, workaday Harlequin romance novel writer (and Harlequin alone publishes something like 400 titles a month). They’ve must’ve given in to red-pill thinking long ago.

        Also: Aren’t female “desire” and female “fantasy” the same thing?

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 9:15 pm thwack

        Also: Aren’t female “desire” and female “fantasy” the same thing?
        ———————————————————————
        No, because one of the things that makes a fantasy a fantasy is the knowledge it has no consequences (because its just a fantasy)
        Lots of women have rape fantasies, but it doesn’t mean they DESIRE to be raped. What they desire is to be so attractive a man may want to rape them.

        [CH: This is not true. It’s a common assertion by feminists embarrassed by their gender’s love of rape fantasies, but it falls apart under close examination. See here:
        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/what-betas-can-learn-from-womens-rape-fantasies/ ]

        LikeLike


      • on March 19, 2013 at 8:47 am thwack

        OK CH, Im not trying to challenge your logic, but I want my personal disagreement on the record.

        Do women want to submit and be dominated by a man?

        Yes.

        Do they want to be raped at knife point on the side of the road?

        No.

        [CH: Did you know many rape victims experience orgasm during the act? Medical doctors can tell when they come in for tests.

        ps stop right now with the strawmen or you are banned for life. you have been warned.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 19, 2013 at 11:28 am Jason

        You both may be right.

        Women don’t want to be raped at knifepoint on the side of the road.

        AND

        Women sometimes experience orgasm during this type of trauma nonetheless.

        LikeLike


      • on March 19, 2013 at 6:15 pm Lily

        Let me clarify for all 3 of you what women want.

        Thwack, women want to be raped, and CH is right when he says that feminists are embarrassed to admit it. It’s also why they try to classify rape as a hate crime (against women), or a crime of power. It’s not. It’s a crime of sex. But here is the catch, and that’s where you are right and CH is partially wrong – MOST women want to be in control of who is doing the raping so that a stranger off the street is not desirable, BUT the Hero off the cover of a romance novel is highly desirable. Of course, playing rape with your dominant BF/husband is the highest of turn ons. These types of fantasies is what most normal women have, and I don’t know of one normal woman who doesn’t fantasize. If she is happy in her relationship, she’ll fantasize about what she wants her man to do to her (he will be the center of her fantasies), and if she is unhappy with her man or not seeing anyone, she will fantasize about her “dream man” instead. A dominant man is such a turn on, her fantasies will be focused solely on him. Therefore, if your woman is fantasizing about another man (even one that doesn’t exist in real life), fantasizing about being in situations with other men, has all kinds of sexual fantasy that doesn’t involve you, you’re not a turn on enough for her, and she isn’t deeply in love with you. Fantasy about other man is a form of cheating. If a woman cheats, she isn’t in love and definitely not in lust.

        On the other hand, some women do indeed have sexual fantasies that are dangerous, and in which case they see themselves in situations like being gang raped or asphyxiated during sex. I have to agree with CH that in such cases (for these particular females) these fantasies could be a secret wish. I don’t see why anyone would fantasize about something they didn’t wish would happen. Fantasy is a wish, make no mistake about it. I believe that if we could, we would all step into a chamber for a time and be transported to a place where our fantasies could be acted out. No one fantasizes about something they don’t like, or don’t want to happen. When you fantasizes about that hot girl you have just seen and would like to fuck, or that hot car you’d like to buy, don’t you really wish for these things? Don’t assume that just because some things are illogical, bad, or dangerous the fantasizer isn’t really wishing it. Some people’s actions defy logic. In the case of some women, they get off on danger, pain, and gore.

        Jason, I agreed. Most normal women don’t want to be raped at gun point by a filthy stranger, and the ones that experienced orgasm, who really knows why they did. Maybe they became attracted to their rapists all of sudden? Maybe those rapists said things that turned their victims on? Maybe some rapists fuck real good and that caused their victims to have an orgasm? Maybe the rapists who caused orgasms in their victims weren’t complete strangers – maybe they were date rapists where the females already know and have some feelings for their dates even though they weren’t ready to have sex that night? Who really knows the circumstances of how these women managed to get so aroused? There is a theory that it’s involuntary to get an orgasm during rape so that it limits the damage to the vagina, but I don’t believe it because if that were true then all women would have such a reaction during rape. I believe that some rapes are just more pleasurable than others, depending on the circumstances and the man doing the raping. If he is not a complete stranger and there is some attraction to him by the female, it makes sense that in these situations an orgasm might happen more often than the filthy stranger off the street filled with diseases and armed with a knife. Hence, I think we need a lot more research into this before we could say all women enjoy forced sex with stargazers and have orgasms no matter what the circumstances are, as that’s not the case. As of now, it clearly looks like it depends on the circumstances.

        LikeLike


      • on March 19, 2013 at 7:36 pm thwack

        Jason, he deleted the explanation of my logic.

        [CH: The rule established circa Feb 2013 clearly states that all comments relying on strawmen for the force of their arguments will be summarily trashed or edited for comedic effect. Be glad the latter wasn’t your fate.]

        Rape fantasies are the luxury of females under no threat of being raped (bull dykes, powerful wealthy white women…)

        [Read the post I linked to. Rape fantasies are the domain of all women, not just bull dykes (?).]

        Females under real threat of being raped don’t have this fantasy or desire.

        [But they do. And the rape fantasies they relish the most are *coercive* rapes, where she exerts little to no control in her fantasy. Again, read the studies in the post linked to earlier.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 20, 2013 at 6:07 am thwack

        Question:

        If all women have rape fantasies, and desire to be raped… what is the effect if they actually get raped?

        a) No more rape fantasies/desires?
        b) Increased rape fantasies/desires?
        c) No effect either way?

        [CH: That’s a good question. Do real life rape victims have more or fewer rape fantasies? It’d be hard to get a study like that funded. Whatever the results, feminists will rationalize it to their favor du jour.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 20, 2013 at 6:48 am Kate

        Women do not want to be raped. If they say they do, they are misusing the term. Some women might want/need an excessive amount of dominance, but that is not the same thing. There is no nuance to the vocabulary to specifically describe what is okay and what becomes assault.

        LikeLike


      • on March 20, 2013 at 11:41 am Jason

        Sperm Wars has an eye-opening chapter on how women’s plumbing actually become more receptive to fertilization by a rapist’s sperm, not less.

        Female biology: What. The. Hell.

        LikeLike


      • on March 20, 2013 at 5:06 pm Lily

        “If all women have rape fantasies, and desire to be raped… what is the effect if they actually get raped?”

        “[CH: That’s a good question. Do real life rape victims have more or fewer rape fantasies?……”

        @Thwack & @CH, fascinating question. Maybe I can shed some light.

        I read a couple of years ago an interview with rape victims. Some of the women (and not a small minority) said that even after they were raped they still had rape fantasies. They felt very embarrassed by the notion. Some felt they deserved it and that there was something wrong with them, because they fantasized about something so violent, not knowing that other women in similar situations did it too. Some of them even reported that they enjoyed acting out rape scenes with their BFs/husbands despite the nightmares they still had about their real rape incidents. Granted, we don’t know the circumstances under which they were raped, so we can’t be sure how violent these incidents were, and if they knew their assailants before. Nevertheless, this leads us to believe that rape fantasizes are indeed part of the female psyche.

        Make what you want of it. But I think it’s telling. Women enjoy being dominated by strong masculine guys even after being victims of male sexual violence.

        Also, I don’t think women should be embarrassed by the truth. This is part of the psychological and biological makeup, and there is nothing we can do to alter it, unless we masculinize ourselves. Subconsciously and primitively, this is how women judge the worthiness and masculinity of a man – if she can’t step all over him, if he can overcome her objections when he wants to, if he is stronger than her physically and mentally – this is what she is looking for. It’s feminists who should be ashamed for trying to hide the truth.

        [CH: Well said Lily.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 20, 2013 at 7:34 pm thwack

        Kate
        Women do not want to be raped. If they say they do, they are misusing the term.
        ——————————————————————–

        Kate, stop right now with the strawomen or you are banned for life. you have been warned.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 4:23 pm Lily

        @cynthia

        “I’d argue that quite a lot of these writers actually have out of control hamsters. Like the bitch wrote Eat Pray Love, or that retarded piece of crap, 50 Shades of Gray. No self-awareness there. At all. I’m sure there are some romance writers who understand real feminine desire, and some who may manipulate it just like you say, but quite a lot of that genre is pure, undiluted, female fantasy.”

        I don’t think you’re right at all. I didn’t read 50 shades or others of its genre, but I’m quite familiar with the story and I think that although the writing is crappy, the story and the idea are not. There is lots of awareness there, but it’s mostly on the subconscious level, intuitive, and primitive, which is what the female mind is, but we don’t like to admit it. It’s only man’s sexual desires that are thought of as primitive, not female. Well, they are both primitive when they are unhindered, and these writers hold nothing back, which is why I think they are very much in tune with feminine desires.

        @Jason

        “Aren’t female “desire” and female “fantasy” the same thing?”

        Pretty much.

        LikeLike


    • on March 16, 2013 at 6:10 am Mercy

      Verified. Been to a couple of writer conferences. There’s mostly dead hamsters who you can talk about anything with. The few remaining hamsters are spinning into overdrive, but there are no hot women in sight.

      LikeLike


    • on March 16, 2013 at 8:25 am whorefinder

      lmao.

      It’s cute how fags like Sweetheart Jason like to pretend their all hard and drink Jameson and know game.

      Reality: Sweetheart Jason drinks appletinis (easy on the tini), white knights, and is a vegan faggot who worships the negro “man.”

      LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 10:13 pm Jason

        Wrong on every count. But your imagination makes for great reading.

        Have you thought about hosting a right-wing racial hate show? Because craaaaaaazy really works on television.

        Cheers, bitch.

        (clinks whiskey)

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 5:41 pm fascinated

        lmao.

        It’s cute how Idiot Whorefinder can’t spell they’re.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 9:22 pm thwack

        Is he black?

        He might be because he has a sister named Ammonia.

        LikeLike


      • on March 19, 2013 at 6:35 am whorefinder

        Aw, it’s cute how Sweetheart Jason sock-puppets supporters and tries to pretend his faggoty ass has a following.

        LikeLike


      • on March 19, 2013 at 11:26 am Jason

        you’ve gone off your meds

        LikeLike


  16. on March 15, 2013 at 2:13 pm Wrecked 'Em

    I visit CH because it’s the only place on the web where the comment thread can alternate, seamlessly, between discussion about blowjobs and immigration.

    Really… where else can you go for that?

    LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 2:29 pm Tilikum

      http://www.latinwhores.com?

      LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 8:26 am whorefinder

        Threadwinner.

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 2:32 pm Black Poison Soul

      It’s fucking brilliant, innit.

      Spitting for lube, meh.

      The only warning a girl gets when blowing me is when I grip the head harder and my breathing gets louder.

      LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 2:34 pm Anonymous

      With what our Corporatist Overlords want from immigrants, aren’t they really the same thing?

      ∞

      LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 7:13 pm cynthia

      There’s an endless supply of fascinating analysis that can be applied to this place. If only I was still in college with my old SWPL English teachers…

      LikeLike


  17. on March 15, 2013 at 2:34 pm Trimegistus

    Democrats spend fifty years deliberately dismantling America. Who’s to blame? Republicans!

    What’s that I hear coming from inside your head, CH? It sounds kind of like a hamster running on a wheel.

    LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 7:18 pm corvinus

      As G. K. Chesterton once said, paraphrased: “The role of progressives is to screw things up; the role of conservatives is to prevent fixing of what the progressives screwed up.”

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 8:27 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

        ‘Conservatives’: Political participant who only play defense and deserve to loose. Conserving what? if you never regenerate something you stand for not against. Repubs never turn around, they conserve. Go green. Ugh! And both Dems and Repubs care about the planet. Fucking traitors.

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 8:23 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

      @Trimegistus, come on now. It was never a true 2-party system once the Fed could print money and dominate earned money. Military-industrial complex: in Vietnam with Johnson(D) then Nixon(R), in Iraq with Bush(R) then Obama(D). Note how Nixon and Obama stayed as long as possible and then Obama does his own surge, in Afghanistan. The deficit spending and open borders is both parties. When Repubs complain, they don’t actually want to win except to calm stragglers nerves until they get normalized. Republicans are the backstop party. Dems have the front of the pack down the road to serfdom; Repubs, the back. Hegelian dialectic already.

      LikeLike


  18. on March 15, 2013 at 2:55 pm d13

    speaking of blow jobs… this all started when we allowed those who suck dick to vote.

    when is our hard reset?

    LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 8:28 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

      Amen. (And I ain’t religious.)

      LikeLike


    • on March 16, 2013 at 8:27 am whorefinder

      Actually, it’s when we allowed those without property to vote. It used to be a requirement that a man owned property to vote—he was a stakeholder.

      Now it’s just looting by the masses.

      LikeLike


      • on March 17, 2013 at 8:10 am thwack

        Actually, it’s when we allowed those without property to vote.
        ———————————————————-
        OK, so should those without property refuse to be drafted to die in wars?

        People who can vote, vote themselves more property; how were the fondling fathers any different than todays women?

        LikeLike


      • on March 17, 2013 at 11:07 am Whitehall

        From the start, American men who signed up to fight (and survived) were given grants of land, just like during the Roman Republic and early Empire where Julius Caesar’s legions were given lands in Hispania (Spain) and Gaul (France).

        If you fought in the Revolution, you were given land in what’s called the Western Addition of northeast Ohio, for example.

        The heroes of the Battle of Tippecanoe got land in Indiana.

        The Irish (and others) who fought with the Union in the Civil War got the Homestead Act.

        And so on.

        Perhaps we should give veterans of the Islamic Wars oil and gas leases on Federal lands, or the state of Nevada. The latter would flood Harry Reid’s state with new conservative voters.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 8:17 am whorefinder

        Nigs, you’re in WAY over your empty little head here.

        should those without property refuse to be drafted to die in wars?
        —tough titty, bitch. Don’t take the king’s protection if you’re not willing to serve the king.

        Or go back to the “paradise” that is black AfriKKKKa. lol.

        People who can vote, vote themselves more property; how were the fondling fathers any different than todays women
        —Lmao. Anyone who looks at non-black male societies knows this isn’t so. Men who earn property do not pass laws to get more of it—-they either conquer it or or take it.

        It is only non-men—-nigs, women, and fags—who abuse the system so.

        Fact.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 10:22 am thwack

        “Men who earn property do not pass laws to get more of it—-they either conquer it or or take it.”
        ——————————————————————————————–

        Correct.

        And this is why you better not scream like a bitch when the sekiK conquer or take yours:

        Possibly with my help?

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 11:17 am whorefinder

        when the sekiK conquer or take yours:
        —lmao. Boy, when ISlam sweeps over the land, they will slaughter the unuseful faggots like yourself, but they leave the useful around.

        Possibly with my help?
        —lmao stupid, stupid darkie. Doesn’t understand his veryb life is because whitey is benevolent. The Arabs will castrate his faggot ass, wrap a tire around his neck, and light him on fire. And no EEOC or NAACP or Jesse Jackson will save his worthless monkey ass.

        Like we should do.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 11:47 am Nicole

        Whore, what have I told you about insulting your own mother?

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 11:53 am thwack

        Are white people really this fearful of Islam?

        or is Boyfinder flipping out from lack of meds?

        This is interesting.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 12:16 pm Nicole

        They have good reason to fear. Muslims are the only people in the world with a higher sense of entitlement than themselves.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 1:02 pm thwack

        Lily?

        is that you Lily?

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 9:50 pm Whitehall

        That was great! Thanks.

        LikeLike


  19. on March 15, 2013 at 3:04 pm gunslingergregi

    So you may as well begin the process of carving out a new party and starting from scratch.””””

    i see what you did with the coparison to the slow steady bj
    don’t get fancy
    go with tried and true

    LikeLike


  20. on March 15, 2013 at 3:06 pm thwack

    Why is the WHITE “superpower” country the one with the most nonwhite people? (United States)

    Why was the white country with the most spooks the one to get to the moon first?

    Same thing with Britain and Rome. Lots of interaction with nonwhite people and lots of power and wealth. Seems like a connection to me?

    LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 3:39 pm whorefinder

      Why is the WHITE “superpower” country the one with the most nonwhite people? (United States)
      —lol. Typical dumb darkie. Confusing “cause” and “effect”. And you’re not non-white people, 3/5ths.

      Why was the white country with the most spooks the one to get to the moon first?
      –Yes, the all-white NASA that got us there (with supporting help from a group of ex-Nazi scientists, natch) with darkies doing it all.

      Or…we were just trying to get as far away from you pigs as possible.

      Same thing with Britain and Rome. Lots of interaction with nonwhite people and lots of power and wealth. Seems like a connection to me?
      —To a nigger, correlation always equals causation if it can be spun in darkie’s favor. Cargo cult mentality of the the low IQ “humans.”

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 7:19 pm corvinus

        Because the USA also had the second largest white population after the USSR, which was the major other space power.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 8:37 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

        A public service message: Western Slavs are the Negroes of Caucasians. No fucking way does Russia qualify as Europe, not even the ass end. USSR only happen on your US taxpayer dime: it’s the only thing that makes sense.

        Antony C. Sutton got fired from academia–ironically or not, but specifically the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace–for telling the truth I expect.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_C._Sutton

        May there be justice delivered by my hands: that is what ultimate alpha means to me. Got to be self-sufficient politically before you can be self-sufficient economically.

        LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 8:42 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

        I luv you Western Slavs. I meant the Eastern Slavs are the Negroes of Caucasians. Just a fact of history if you go by societal achievement. Cosmonauts?, waaaaaay out of character. They had their own Nazis scientists perhaps but I think they had ours and our tax money too. Today, US Marines fight Taliban funded by Pakistan funded by…you American taxpayers. Military-Industrial C-O-M-P-L-E-X.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 2:41 am Nicole

        I noticed that Reality Doug’s posts aren’t getting much love.

        Remember what I said about Europeans selling out to become generic “White”? Well, here’s one of the reasons. It is also one of the main reasons Africans should stop being so butt hurt like they’re singled out for special treatment. Yeah, dark skin is easier to differentiate, but dead is dead.

        Racism didn’t magically appear out of nowhere with the trans Atlantic slave trade. It developed over many thousands or hundreds of thousands of years of human history and experience. Many people had very natural, if not good reasons for avoiding one another. They still play themselves out in Europe and even the U.S. where you were merged into a giant multikult and are now naturally self destructive since you’ve sold your identities.

        I mean, what’s a bit of African blood when you’re already “polluted”?

        Heritage anyone?

        Honor? Anyone?

        Once Pandora’s box has been opened, there’s no way to close it again. So cope in whatever way suits you. Just understand the reality of your situation before deciding what to do.

        LikeLike


      • on March 24, 2013 at 7:24 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

        Thanks for the love, Nicole. Sex sells, with red-pill awareness like everything else, so the red pill for us in real life, unlike in the movie, has some topical range, some sphere, and though sex is the bull’s eye of life, it is not the field of life or the contest but rather the scoring of results. Sex is politics and politics is power over people and what labor value they have.

        This was your prior comment of 4 Feb. 2013 about generic white (I think):

        ‘No, Fred. I’m human with a variety of ethnicities and two stable cultures. “Black” is the generic box like “White” that American put themselves in to forget where they came from and pretend that the rich give a shit about them so they can justify voting without thinking.’

        Source: https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/02/03/america-the-beautiful-2013/#comment-408447

        The struggle in life goes on by evolutionary force defining progressive virtue in circuituitous fashion. (Now conventional virtue is going the wrong way.) If one can’t see differences in people, one can’t see excellence, possibilities, conflicts, allies, tactics… Admix the able with the inept and you have the lowest common denominator: a conquerable or domesticated sheeple. People who think they are 100% red pill aware are not. The treatment is a process, like thinking or doing research to map and leverage new knowledge. I find blue-pill emotional conditioning every once in a while and remove it. I guess being rigorous about race and ethnicity, getting a functional terminology right, is not something purely sex driven folks care much about. Seeing sex as only sex and as all that matters is an Achelles’ heel that is exploitable. If I wanted to take down the Manosphere, I would explore guiding narrowminded hedonism.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 5:49 pm fascinated

        Whorefinder, judging from your comments, you’ve gotta be a gay man whose daddy was the nigger in the woodpile. Stop with the self hate, would you? Learn to love yourself. (No, I don’t mean with your right hand.)

        LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 4:31 pm lights

      http://www.wired.com/rawfile/2012/04/photos-find-fictional-fun-in-amateur-space-program/

      thwack, is this you?

      LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 5:47 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Isn’t Russia a white superpower? Anyways, if you have all that dead weight to carry you gotta work extra hard. Not being devastated by two world wars and an Iron Curtain on half your competition also helps.

      LikeLike


  21. on March 15, 2013 at 6:37 pm thwack

    Isn’t Russia a white superpower?
    —————————————————-
    Yes, but were white people trying to move there from the U.S?
    No, it was the other way around and still is today. The U.S is the most dynamic country on the planet; its inventions, culture, LANGUAGE are the true power of its influence. You obviously have never been out of the U.S

    (((shakin my head)))

    LikeLike


    • on March 15, 2013 at 7:20 pm corvinus

      Yes, but were white people trying to move there from the U.S?

      My brother, for one.

      LikeLike


      • on March 15, 2013 at 8:34 pm thwack

        Yeah Corvinus, but he is only doing it because he made his money here, and it will go a lot farther there; including sexually. Reminds me of those union goons in the blue states who are so pro union, they retire to an anti union red state; where they can live cheaply like a king.

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 8:33 am whorefinder

        lmao rofl.

        Oh yeah, nigs, it’s LANGUAGE that makes it so great! It’s all you negroes and your wonderful argo!

        Funny how every black area is a shithole. Must be whitey’s fault!

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 10:09 am thwack

        all Im saying is the presence of a large black population in the U.S was a net plus regarding the wealth and power the U.S came to have.

        Compare Australia and Canada to the U.S?

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 10:41 am whorefinder

        all Im saying is the presence of a large black population in the U.S was a net plus regarding the wealth and power the U.S came to have.

        Compare Australia and Canada to the U.S?

        —LMAO ROFL.

        No, nigs, the presence of a large stupid violent parasitic class of subhumans DID NOT CAUSE U.S. greatness.

        Stupid cargo cult nigger. Correlation is not causation.

        P.s. Australia has it’s own dung-eating niggers. Ever look that up, son?

        No, you’re far too stupid for that.

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 12:13 pm corvinus

        Compare Australia and Canada to the U.S?

        They have fewer people than California, so of course they wouldn’t have as much wealth and power as us.

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 6:15 pm thwack

        corvinus
        Compare Australia and Canada to the U.S?

        They have fewer people than California, so of course they wouldn’t have as much wealth and power as us.
        ———————————————————————–
        Thats my point. Maybe if they had black slaves build some infrastruture, more white people would have come earlier on?
        Basically Im saying all white people in the U.S benefited from slavery. Northeners had jobs based on the raw materials produced in the slave states. which in turn produced demand for all kinds of manufactured goods and services these employed white people could now afford.

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 7:58 pm gunslingergregi

        even the chinese didn’t build their own infrastructure they had germans do it

        LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 12:14 pm corvinus

        No, actually, he’s fresh out of college (with student-loan debt) and was unable to find a good job here.

        LikeLike


      • on March 17, 2013 at 5:26 am Nicole

        I always laugh when people say they couldn’t find a good job in the U.S. You mean he couldn’t find a job that paid what he thinks he deserves, and moved someplace with less competition.

        LikeLike


      • on March 17, 2013 at 5:35 am gunslingergregi

        well 89k tax free helps too

        LikeLike


    • on March 16, 2013 at 11:28 am Hugh G. Rection

      Just ignoring my other points?

      LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 6:16 pm thwack

        you talkin to me?

        LikeLike


    • on March 16, 2013 at 4:06 pm Canadian Friend

      … The U.S is the most dynamic country on the planet; its inventions, culture, LANGUAGE are the true power of its influence. … .

      Inventions by whites
      Culture of white man
      Language of white man

      Thank for acknowledging whites do great things!

      LikeLike


      • on March 17, 2013 at 11:24 pm thwack

        If it wasn’t for Rush, the average white person couldn’t find Canada on a map.

        (((shakin my head)))

        LikeLike


  22. on March 15, 2013 at 7:21 pm Johnny Caustic

    I really love the phony gonzo drool. When the instroke pushes a small stream of spit past her lips, down her chin, and onto her tits, something very profound and wonderful happens in my limbic system. I can’t explain it, but there it is. It’s almost as profoundly primal as the Republican response to fantasies of electoral victory through the votes of gonzo “natural conservatives”.

    LikeLike


    • on March 17, 2013 at 1:43 am DirkJohanson

      You should check out my scenes with Carmen Valentina on http://www.CarmenValentina.com I’ve never been with a girl who drools even 1/10 as much.

      LikeLike


  23. on March 15, 2013 at 7:41 pm Pope Frankie

    That’s your garden variety respectable conservative. Trying to out-liberal the liberal and failing like the omegas they are. These cowards are too spineless to appeal to their base, white men. They used to complain years ago that their daughters would end up marrying non-whites. Now they complain that the non-whites are not “assimilating”. I’d rather let the multi-cult keep destroying the nation in overdrive than have one of those plastic smiling Rinos pretending to hold back the flood. Let it fucking rain. Its waking my race up faster.

    LikeLike


  24. on March 15, 2013 at 9:21 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

    Continuing my MIC(omplex) theme…it seems Antony C. Sutton was right:

    ” ‘GAZ’ 69 Jeep
    One of the very first Russian-made off-road vehicles, the GAZ Jeep has been modified dozens of times since its 1938 inception. Used by Viet Cong forces in the Vietnam War, the GAZ had capable handling in harsh conditions, but often suffered from constant breakdowns and poor gas mileage. Weapons were often mounted on the back of the vehicle to give it offensive capabilities.”

    Source: http://www.ign.com/articles/2004/09/30/the-vehicles-of-conflict-vietnam

    ” Construction and pre-war years:
    Оn may 31, 1929, the Council of the USSR and the American company Ford Motor Company entered into an agreement on technical assistance for the organization and the organization of mass production of cars and trucks. The basis of the production program were selected models of Ford and Ford-AA.”

    ” 1961-1980 years.
    In the 1960s ended with the updated line of trucks. Adopting the conveyor GAZ-52 (1961), GAZ-53 (1961) and GAZ-66(1964) formed the third generation of trucks GAS. The GAZ-53, GAZ-66 started to install new power units with a powerful карбюраторным V8 engine. A four-wheel drive truck dual-purpose GAS-66 was the first among the cars of the USSR awarded the State quality symbol.
    Since the beginning of the 1960s to replace the famous «21-St» «Volga» was conducted the development of the passenger car GAZ-24 «Volga», the experimental-industrial party, which was prepared in 1968, and in 1970 began mass production. The car was marked by the awards: the gold medals at the International exhibitions in 1969 in Plovdiv (Bulgaria) and in 1970 in Leipzig (GDR).
    The production of a veteran of the GAZ-21 was closed in July of 1970-th, and in April 1975, with the production was filmed another veteran – GAZ-51A. The last descended from the conveyor of the legendary truck went to the Museum of the history of GAS. ”

    Source: http://gaz-avto.ucoz.ru/index/the_gorky_automobile_plant_gaz/0-4

    So was Ford there in the USSR helping create, directly or indirectly, any GAZ Jeeps routinely deployed in the Vietnam War? Was Wall Street there? If the Pentagon Papers tell men every president lied about Vietnam, then I am inclined to believe Mr. Sutton.

    LikeLike


  25. on March 15, 2013 at 10:08 pm Rum

    Conservative Political Action Committee = clueless about hot girls.
    Amen.
    Larry Auster has always been clueless about hot girls as well but I do not hate him for it. He never had a chance to know better. Unlike some others whose names deserve to be made into punch-lines.

    LikeLike


  26. on March 15, 2013 at 10:26 pm Rum

    A polite BJ giver understands the process: To make it as quick as possible, swallow everything as if nothing unseemly has happened, and then go right back to talking about the stupidity of the CPAC.
    I have never been with A. Coulter.

    LikeLike


  27. on March 16, 2013 at 1:09 am Chemical O

    We can no longer sit back and allow Liberal infiltration, Liberal indoctrination, Liberal subversion and the international Liberal conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

    LikeLike


  28. on March 16, 2013 at 9:55 am skilaki

    I don’t know what it will take to kick the illegals out of here. Perhaps an American economic collapse may do the trick. Otherwise the future will likely have whites living in gated communities while the cities are mostly minority. Any bets on a looming racial/civil war here in the US?

    LikeLike


  29. on March 16, 2013 at 3:31 pm CoffeeCrazed

    re. email #1 – it was probably on here I read the exchange.
    Her: Will you still love me if I get fat?
    Him: Let’s not find out.

    LikeLike


    • on March 16, 2013 at 3:32 pm CoffeeCrazed

      posted to wrong article.

      LikeLike


  30. on March 16, 2013 at 6:18 pm thwack

    Ann Coulter is smart and has body slammed many a liberal; but she kinda resembles “Skelator” (Maria Shriver too)

    LikeLike


    • on March 16, 2013 at 8:15 pm Whitehall

      saw her CPAC speech. Not terrible but she can do better. I did appreciate her declaration that she’s now a one issue voter – amnesty.

      I got pretty sick of her slobbering over Chris Christie last cycle. She has since renounced that mistake.

      Agreed, too skinny for my tastes but smart and witty. A better dinner date than bed buddy but I’m open – all she has to do is call me.

      LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 8:58 pm Tyrone

        People forget, Anne is in her late 40s.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 12:35 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Chairman Ann, representin’ the manjaw minority. *holds up lighter*

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 4:36 pm Lily

        @Tyrone

        She is actually 51-52 and she look great for her age, doesn’t she? She looks much younger than liberal women her age. I wonder why? Maybe being a good girl helps you not look used and abused?????

        @ Whitehall

        She is not really that skinny. She appears skinny because she is extremely tall. She’s more tall than skinny. Her neck is too long for my taste (giraffe like). But she has a very nice face for a woman in her early 50s. She probably had some work done, but still, it looks very natural on her.

        Yeah, this Chris Christie business didn’t help her credibility. I was very surprised that she kept pushing him when we all knew he wasn’t much of a conservative. I thought she was just desperate because she wanted our side to win so badly. I hope she learned her lesson. Compromising doesn’t work. Better go with a staunch conservative and showcase our values, than put them on the auction block for everyone to buy and sell.

        LikeLike


      • on March 18, 2013 at 9:54 pm Whitehall

        I too was looking a fighter so I can understand her preference for Christie based on that characteristic alone.

        However, I preferred Rick Perry since he was both a fighter and a great conservative and federalist. Too bad about his operation – he was on pain killers during the primary debates. I really liked his CPAC speech too.

        Christie is out of the running for 2013 but Perry is still a contender.

        LikeLike


      • on March 19, 2013 at 5:26 pm Lily

        Yep, I agree with you about Rick Perry. I was very disappointed with what happened to him, and the lefty media made him look like a fool of course. No one mentioned the pain killers issue. Let’s hope he’s still interested for 2016.

        LikeLike


    • on March 16, 2013 at 9:23 pm thwack

      For our friends who don’t know who Skeletor is, he’s a racist super villain:

      LikeLike


      • on March 16, 2013 at 9:44 pm gunslingergregi

        skeletor was never racist dammit quit trying to change history ya god dammed devil

        LikeLike


      • on March 17, 2013 at 3:30 am santa666

        You know how you know skeletor is a racist?

        Because he’s white.

        LikeLike


      • on March 17, 2013 at 5:33 am gunslingergregi

        hhahahahahahhahaha

        LikeLike


      • on March 17, 2013 at 8:18 am thwack

        Thats interesting. Notice how He-Man gets darker when he transforms into his super powers?

        LikeLike


  31. on March 17, 2013 at 2:54 am shmiggen

    PS A slow and steady blowjob, lots of soft lip but with no phony gonzo drooling, is really sexy.

    Concur absolutely, but I would add “with eye contact.”

    LikeLike


  32. on March 17, 2013 at 10:41 pm howdy

    Blowjobs in porn are overrated. Cunniligus on the other hand is so underrepresented.

    LikeLike


    • on March 18, 2013 at 7:58 am Tyrone

      Because cunnilingus is boring to watch but blowjobs aren’t.

      LikeLike


  33. on March 18, 2013 at 4:42 pm Lily

    “Ever have a girl try to copy a porn move on you that she once saw, except it was one of those disgusting porn moves, like spitting for lube or gag drooling during a blowjob, that no normal man really likes?”

    What woman watches porn? Just a slut. Not to mention she practices what she “learns” on you???? At least have some decency to hide your whorishness if so. Where is that divorced slut who cheated on her hubby and is carrying on with her lover in front of her 3 children? This be right up her ally.

    “So you may as well begin the process of carving out a new party and starting from scratch.”

    If only that was possible. The trouble is there are too many of them than there are of us at this point, which is why they win elections. The dem/rep both allowed immigrants here for the past 50 years, which is why the demographics of the population changed. Not only Hispanics have been allowed to immigrate but Africans and Muslims too. Did you see what’s going on CA? Half of Africa has moved in. And what about Muslims? In the last 20 years we have had a vast Islamic immigration here. As of now, we are the minority.

    LikeLike


    • on March 20, 2013 at 7:14 pm thwack

      Lily
      What woman watches porn? Just a slut. Not to mention she practices what she “learns” on you????
      ———————————————————————–

      is her porn any worse than the rape fantasy going on between your ears?

      LikeLike


  34. on March 18, 2013 at 8:00 pm Rick

    CPAC in an even smaller nutshell: Obama bad, guns, drink pop, Obama bad

    LikeLike


  35. on March 19, 2013 at 7:53 am thwack

    Lily
    In the last 20 years we have had a vast Islamic immigration here. As of now, we are the minority
    ————————————————————————-
    Calm down Lily; White people have ALWAYS been a minority population. Matter of fact even Jesus probably looked like Bin Laden.

    LikeLike


    • on March 20, 2013 at 4:14 pm Lily

      “White people have ALWAYS been a minority population.”

      True, if you compare against world population. However, we’re talking about western countries, in particular the USA. We were never the minority in this country, or in other western countries. It’s time for accuracy, dear.

      “Matter of fact even Jesus probably looked like Bin Laden.”

      Well, he was Jewish, so he probably looked Semitic, not European, so what? So because Jesus looked more Semitic than European we should welcome all Muslims here? What a shallow thing to say and devoid of substance. I expected more form you. You’re not that shallow, and you’re even wise at times. Please go back to that state and stop splitting hairs.

      For the record, Muslims should not be allowed to immigrate here not because of our hate for them, but because of their hate for us. They are not immigrating here for “Truth, Justice, and the American Way.” They are immigrating here for jihadist reasons. Sorry, you can’t see clearly, hun.

      LikeLike


  36. on March 28, 2013 at 8:26 pm Blaximus

    wtf? The comments…. Did the nasty girl spit on you? Gross you out? Whoa.

    And of course it’s peppered with racist mumbo jumbo.

    Wtf is the point any more….

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    hans on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
    Jay in DC on Sweden Vs Norway
    Agent X on NPC Culture, In One Meme
    Carlos Danger on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    nihilistjokes on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    Captain John Charity… on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    Carlos Danger on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
    Captain John Charity… on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    Carlos Danger on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    Captain John Charity… on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
  • Top Posts

    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • The Three Abrahamic Religions, Abbreviated
    • NPC Culture, In One Meme
    • Sweden Vs Norway
    • Don't Help The Leftoid Media Sway Elections
    • Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Oddly Acquainted With Western Feminist Propaganda
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Red Tsunami?
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: