• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Revealed Preferences Of Drunk Girls
The Next Great Dismissive Alpha Male Line »

Spot The Lesser Beta Male

March 28, 2013 by CH

Watch this segment on a gayly gay talk show. The mighty, gray-haired warrior male interviews two “””men””” and a woman living together in a polyandrous arrangement. (It’s silly to bless this perversion with the honorific of a relationship.)

Both of these men are betas. Maybe you could even call them functioning greater omegas. Why not just call them omega males? Because omega males are typically incapable of getting sex from any woman who doesn’t resemble a dirigible or an extra from the Star Wars cantina scene. At least these two males are, presumably, having some kind of sex with this rather fetching woman of desirable waist-hip ratio and slender BMI.

But one of these males is definitely the bottom bitch in this losers’ triangle. He is the one used for purposes of satisfying the woman’s emotional whoring needs, and for puttering around the adult playpen cleaning up the scattered sex-stained undergarments that the other male leaves on the floor after doing his job as the house cockubine.

He is the lesser beta, and his mission in life is asexual supportiveness, LJBF intimacy, trips to the pharmacist to get the morning after pill when male #1 forgets to pull out, and reflections in the cuckold corner hunched over his effortful pud, wet-eyed and trembly, as the other two housemates pound it out for his emasculatory benefit. Once in a blue moon she services him with a dreary handjob so that he doesn’t stray too far from his duty as harem pit crew.

Can you spot which of the two males is the lesser beta? Take a moment.

.

.

.

.

.

Watch closely from 0:38-0:42.

Catch that?

A woman’s real feelings — her true unadulterated distilled purified desire — will rarely escape from her lips in the form of words. It will, instead, shoot from her fingertips, or emanate from her pelvis, or infuse the air around her thighs, or pierce the nicety veil from her hardening eyes. A woman’s words deliver the message of her brain. A woman’s body delivers the message of her vagina.

Near the ends her hamster reveals, “It didn’t mean I had to end this relationship with male #2. I could get my needs met with someone else.”

What a glorious hamster. So strong, so fit. This rodent must never stop running, because the three-way polyandrous arrangement is bottled lightning. Even weepy, scalzied lesser beta males have their id-shaped breaking points, and a woman who is getting both her sexy stud and provider dud needs met in one complete, if bifurcated, package requires an elite, special forces hamster that can spin up at a moment’s notice. Translating the above from its original hamsterese, we learn what the woman is really feeling:

“It didn’t mean I had to face the prospect of losing my kitchen bitch right when I was about to have a love child with another man. I could get my pussy ravaged by a slightly less repulsive man while still getting all the household help and emotional indulgence from a beautiful male feminist a mentally unbalanced woman like myself needed.”

It should not surprise the reader with which of the two males she decided to have her über bastard.

The starkness of the perfectly delineated two male-one female polyandrous circus is a powerful metaphor for the much larger and more accessible reality of the looser, serial soft polyandry that characterizes the dating market of late stage cultures in decline. There may not be many women willing to abide dating two men concurrently, let alone living with them in the same love shack, no matter how sufficiently those men placate the female dueling desires for sexiness and provider assurance and are willing to surrender their balls to the chopping block, but there are certainly plenty of women happy to date an alpha male and use a beta male on the down low for his gift of anhedonic attention. The male orbiter beta brigade plus the alpha male lover is a close approximation of polyandry in the wild.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Beta, Culture, Misandry, The Id Monster, Videos | 365 Comments

365 Responses

  1. on March 28, 2013 at 11:53 am tjic (@tjic)

    Every time you use the word “scalzied” I’ll donate a dollar to charity.

    Something that pays young men to club seals, perhaps.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on March 28, 2013 at 11:54 am tjic (@tjic)

      …and later there can be T-shirts.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 1:16 pm Starets

      That would be a worthy charity. The Canadian province of Newfoundland has had a seasonal seal hunt for hundreds of years. It provided income to subsistence fishermen, and produced valuable fur and meat. It was also useful to reduce the amount of valuable cod eaten by seals, helping to keep the stocks high.

      The hunt has been under sustained attack for decades now by urban douchebag hipster types. They argue against the hunt from a purely feminine, emotional standpoint, with little in the way of facts to back them up. Essentially, it is an issue of seals being cute and furry, with big brown eyes. That itself is one of the big issues in legitimate conservation; charismatic, cute species get all the money, press and effort, while unattractive species go to extinction with nary a tear shed by the urban “conservationists”

      IIRC back in I think the 1990’s, a bunch of Hollywood busybodies went to Newfoundland to protest the hunt. It was a bunch of millionaire actors working to prevent poor subsistence fishermen from earning their living. The fishermen weren’t in the mood to be pushed around by Hollyweirdo liberals, and had a small riot. Martin Sheen got beaten up pretty good, lolz.

      Sorry for the off topic rant; the seal hunt charity idea made me think of this.

      This is an interesting opinion article by a prominent Newfie in Canada’s national media: http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/01/28/rex-murphy-on-with-the-seal-hunt/

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 3:07 pm Hugh Mann

        “Essentially, it is an issue of seals being cute and furry, with big brown eyes.”

        That hipster douchebag Kipling thought so too:

        http://www.gutenberg.org/files/236/236-h/236-h.htm#link2H_4_0007

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:34 pm Starets

        Stories for children. My guess is that he would have expected the male children to eventually grow up, become men, and have a more realistic view of such matters.

        I could be wrong though. However, I don’t recall that Kipling was a macramé and bead wearing vegan.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 8:35 am Zombie Shane

        Apparently there was some polyamorousness in a recent episode of “Celebrity Wife Swap”, involving a conservative Tea Party activist named Dr Gina Loudon:

        http://drginaloudon.com/2013/03/celebrity-wife-swap-spoilers-a-tea-party-activist-a-mother-in-the-middle-of-a-polyamorous-relationship-swap/

        Did anybody see it?

        If I can find a re-run or a Hulu or whatever, then I wouldn’t mind watching it.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 2:02 pm Zombie Shane

        For the record, Rush Limbaugh talked about this Dr Gina Loudon “Celebrity Wife Swap”, on his show today, at about 2:15PM Eastern Time.

        So people are taking notice.

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 12:50 pm josh

      …or feminists.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 5:03 pm Starets

        At least they aren’t as cute and adorable as seals.

        LikeLike


  2. on March 28, 2013 at 11:55 am kleyau

    You can tell at the very beginning. One man is relaxed, with dominant body posture. The other is bent forward with his hand on her knee. Huge dichotomy.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:01 pm PetiteOlive

      yup

      LikeLike


  3. on March 28, 2013 at 11:55 am Bronan the Barbarian!

    They both look like women’s studies professors at the world’s worst community college.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 12:04 pm Glenn P

      You forgot to mention the kick-ass hair styles that they both have and the panties that I’m sure one of them are wearing underneath their pants!!!

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 6:39 pm thwack

      are they part Neanderthal?

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 6:06 pm Meh

        Has that meme officially become mainstream in the manosphere now?

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 6:08 pm Meh

        For those of who you are not hip enough to get the neanderthal reference:

        http://www.koanicsoul.com/blog/
        http://excavatingeden.com/

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 10:59 pm Koanic

        Dude on left has a melon back of head, dude on right has some occipital mass and maybe more socket depth.

        LikeLike


  4. on March 28, 2013 at 11:59 am whiskeysplace

    Eventually of course, the lesser male will go all Columbine on the other two, but women are deluded because of the huge tendency of beta males to placate in Western society on the nature of male violence. Hence the Italian idiot woman who styled herself a “bride for peace” and went hitchhiking across the world in a bride’s outfit. Raped and murdered in Turkey. Or the married woman who went to eat/pray/love in Turkey, hooked up with a couple of guys, and got murdered by some homeless transient high on paint thinner.

    The corollary of polyamory is sudden, horrific violence as the leash snaps.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 1:32 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

      Bless you, @whiskeysplace, for snapping me out of the depression CH put me into with this post. I was crying on the inside for having a baseball bat and not being able to use it, but now I see that is just a small pang of a great ubiquitous nature that will resolve itself without me before we hit bottom as a society. I’m feeling hope and change, change and hope. Great conceptual addendum.

      LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 7:53 pm Lucius Somesuch

      “The corollary of polyamory is sudden, horrific violence as the leash snaps.”

      –A briskly refreshing epigram. I’ll whip this one out the next time I get cornered by a starry-eyed apologist for the Matriarchy.

      Actually, it’d make an appropriate epigraph for a volume of short stories I should write sometime. Or somebody should.

      LikeLike


  5. on March 28, 2013 at 11:59 am simple man

    I lived in the San Francisco bay area for years. All around the area, especially SF proper and the bastion of bullshit, Berkeley, this dynamic is not uncommon. That place is the epicenter of bizarre polyandrous relationships, rife with short haired feminist womyn and castrated hippie beta males.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 1:06 pm Mr.ADHD

      I grew up there, scared me so much I moved to the complete opposite culture, Prague, Czech Rep.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 1:14 pm CJ

        Interesting. How do you like it here?

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 9:08 am Mr.ADHD

        It’s great, no intentions of leaving soon. The women are night and day, I’m sure you see it when running into loud fat western women who think they are so sexy as they stumble home sloppy and drunk, while you walk by with a perfectly styled postured skinny European girl on your arm who is drunk but only you can tell because when you get to the club she starts to rub you under the table.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 3:46 pm BDM

      In Berkeley now. Yes – much of the “polyamory” here is driven by the hamster. I was surprised, since I was first introduced to the concept by a guy who had three really hot girlfriends (Stephane of Ideagasms, if anyone remembers that catastrophic piece of history). When I saw the people involved my first thought was “why are no hot girls doing this?” and then I realized I’d answered my own question.

      I could write a book on the dynamics involved here.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 6:34 am Sherlock

        “I could write a book on the dynamics involved here.”

        Please do. At least elaborate a bit for the chateaus readership.

        LikeLike


      • on March 30, 2013 at 1:55 am BDM

        In theory – polyamory involves getting your emotional and sexual needs met by multiple partners, without the constraints of jealousy or ownership.

        In practice it’s often rationalization and hypergamy at it’s worst.

        Remember, women don’t leave a relationship without the next guy lined up. Polyamory allows the woman to openly court the next man in front of you. I’d bet money the secondary relationship in the above video is a stepping stone to ending the first.

        When one relationship isn’t working, and woman isn’t getting the validation she desires, she can simply jump to another partner who gives her what she wants. Rather than having multiple meaningful relationships, women often have multiple sexual partners distracting them from the fact there is no depth to any of their relationships.

        For many women, polyamory is a way to have lots of sex, while avoiding the dreaded slut label and admitting lots of sex may be what they want. There is a running joke among my friends that whenever a girl says she practices polyamory we ask, “do you practice polyamory or polyfuckery? There’s a difference.” I’d say about half the people practicing “polyamory” don’t actually have multiple relationships; they just have multiple fuck buddies. There can be a lot of drama if one partner in a relationship is practicing polyamory and the other is practicing polyfuckery.

        You can see how this feeds the hypergamous hamster. A girl can jump from partner to partner, without ever having to confront what she actually wants. I’ve met older woman who were “polyamorous” in their twenties, and suddenly start talking about how polyamory doesn’t work when they hit thirty. Highly attractive women often don’t go near the community because they don’t need to – a model could have multiple lovers anytime she wanted to, but entering polyamorous communities would ruin her chances to get commitment from any of them.

        Most men in polyamory are trying to reconcile their desire for multiple partners and the social expectation that it has to come with relationships. In polyamory, a man can have a girlfriend, fuck around on her, and then reframe it as being morally superior to monogamy (“I don’t want to own you, goddess”). Even The Ethical Slut, the definitive book on polyamory has a chapter wagging it’s finger at men pursing “notches.”

        What happens then isn’t then men stop pursuing these things – but that they also rationalize it in feminine “spiritual” language. Unable to express their conflicts, jealousy, and aggression openly it comes out in roundabout passive aggressive spiritual terms. Tolerance, good – judgement, bad. Nevermind that this itself is a judgement.

        I find the social expectations of this community are designed to make the space “safe” for women, and in doing so, neuter the masculine characteristics of the men involved. Authentic masculinity requires a full emotional range which can include aggression, jealousy, and, yes, that tingle-inducing sense of danger.

        I’ve found after my own brief excursion into the polymory community I’ve still been able to pull multiple woman. I usually find that after I tell a girl I’m practicing open relationships, she’ll be upset, try to talk me out of it, and when she sees I won’t, rationalize to herself why it’s okay, because she’s attracted to me. For a man with any sense of self or game, it might actually be easier to set up a polyamorous relationship outside the polyamory community. I like the idea of having multiple relationships openly and honestly, but I don’t need any rationalizations to accomplish that.

        One thing the experience taught me is how contradictory women’s desires are. She wants the alpha male all to herself, but she doesn’t want to change, improve, or give up her other options to do so. The kind of man who’d give up all his options for a woman who won’t do the same isn’t an alpha male.

        It’s enough to make a man desire monogamy.

        LikeLike


  6. on March 28, 2013 at 12:00 pm Glenn P

    “It didn’t mean I had to end this relationship with male #2. I could get my needs met with someone else.”

    WOW!!!!!! What a little man-sharing bitch(but I have to admire her for going after what she wants and making it happen)! I wonder if he enjoys the taste of another mans sperm still covering her vagina while he’s trying to please her by eating her out, that is if he is even doing that to her anymore or if he loves kissing her knowing that his chick is sucking another mans cock because he was too much of a pussy to be the man that DEFINES THE RELATIONSHIP??? How loving and accepting of him!!! LOL

    I wonder how she would react to him doing the same thing? Would she be so open as to have him sleeping with another woman? No way! She knew she could arrange this situation to her advantage and did with no repercussions!

    LikeLike


  7. on March 28, 2013 at 12:01 pm earl

    Limp wrist!

    LikeLike


  8. on March 28, 2013 at 12:02 pm Rick Derris

    Wow … just wow.

    I had a feeling which was the lesser of the two from the “still” frame that YouTube uses and watching the vid confirmed my inclination. Pal, please dump that skank and find another woman.

    Although Anderson Cooper is biggest loser of the three. He let himself get blown up in Iraq and was still a little butt-bitch crying about the poor widdle jihadis at Gitmo. Let’s see him try to get married to his boy-toy under a sharia state.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:05 pm PetiteOlive

      I love Anderson Coops! #notgonnalie

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:21 pm The Other Jim

      Don’t forget when Cooper went all out girly man when he got news on air that the outer casing of the nuclear reactor at Fukushima blew up and nervously asked, “Should I get out of here?”

      Go to the 1:30 mark at the Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cu5kLQpSA4

      Contrast that with reporters like Edward Murrow who stood up on the rooftops in London during the bombings from the Nazi Blitz during WWII.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 4:32 pm cynthia

      OT, but I never liked Anderson Cooper. Not because he’s a liberal pussy, but because of what he represents. He’s every woman’s idealized GayBestFriend. He’s the gay guy a straight woman can still fantasize about fucking.

      LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 8:57 pm KidB

      I saw him at Results Gym in Adams Morgan a few years ago.*

      1. He’s shorter than he appears on tv
      2. He’s more muscular in his upper body than he appears on tv
      3. He had a serious tough-guy look on his face. I think he must be a top.

      *Was the best gym option given my residence at the time. And what better place to hit on chicks than a gym where all the dudes are hitting on each other?

      LikeLike


  9. on March 28, 2013 at 12:04 pm Alpha Philosopher

    Impossible to miss who was the alpha here. The guy on the right reeks of weakness and betatude.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 12:37 pm V

      Neither of them are alpha letting the other man hang around and live with them. No self respect in either of them.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 3:26 pm tjic (@tjic)

        This.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 3:39 pm Jack Amok

        So that makes the guy to her right the BMOG.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:36 pm Starets

        Chief Eunuch.

        LikeLike


  10. on March 28, 2013 at 12:04 pm simple man

    And, to add to that…

    At least in my experience in San Francisco, around a fair number of polyandrous couples, it’s about 80% of the time instigated by…drum roll please:

    The woman.

    The man will tend to go along with it, occasionally shtupping some weathered yoga shiksa trying desperately to maintain her glory years with juice cleanses, Ayurvedic massages, and regular life coaching sessions, while her once stray gray hairs now run rampant. The woman, on the other hand, will usually end up fooling around with 2 or 3 Burning Man artists (SFs version of the bad boy) or a DJ of some type.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 12:24 pm John

      “The woman, on the other hand, will usually end up fooling around with 2 or 3 Burning Man artists (SFs version of the bad boy) or a DJ of some type.”

      LOL

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:13 pm The Other Jim

      It’s true, women will be as slutty as men allow. It’s quote a damning indictment on men living in the West.

      LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 1:25 am Hugh G. Rection

      Hah, life coaching. That has to be one of the greatest scams of all time. Someone who doesn’t have his shit together enough to get a real job teaching someone else about life.

      Almost as great as giving sensitivity or diversity seminars.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 3:32 am thwack

        not necessarily; the naked man who rents his coat to others is using the same skill set peddled on this blog.

        LikeLike


  11. on March 28, 2013 at 12:04 pm feministx

    Lol, this whole mess is the opposite of my boyfriend’s world.

    I would bet money that my boyfriend’s wife would feel relieved if my boyfriend wanted to move back into their house and bring me there too. She already intimated that she kind of would like to happen. (It won’t because my boyfriend wouldn’t weird his kids out like that). As it stands now, she has no plans of divorcing him even though I’ve been dating him for 4 years.

    Strangely or not strangely, neither me nor my boyfriend’s wife likes to have sex with him. Both of us want him to take care of us while some other girl sees to his sexual needs.

    Anyway, I would think that it is no easier or more likely for a guy to stand being in a polyandrous relationship than a woman. Women don’t want to look at themselves and see that they are someone that gets a different dick inside of them each day.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 12:44 pm Flavia

      So what’s your boyfriend’s relationship with his wife? Are you two on speaking terms?

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 1:29 pm feministx

        My boyfriend’s wife has asked to speak to me, but he does not let her meet me. She talks to him over the phone often, the go out to various social events together such as weddings and old friend’s parties, and she invites him over from time to time to fix stuff around the house.

        My boyfriend’s wife has been very dependent on him to take care of her and manage her life. She is a dancer and now runs her own dance school for some uncommon form of dance. Honestly, she seems not to be the sharpest tool in the shed, so she depends on him to manage many of the business aspects of the school for her. He built her studio and helps her with finances, taxes and managing workshops. On the phone (from what I overhear), she sounds like a very spoiled and self centered lady, but she’s not that bright so my boyfriend easily wins arguments with her, and she eventually relents to his interpretations of stuff.

        I have not seen the video this post is about as I am at work, but the gist of it makes me wonder about how common this kind of thing would be if it were acceptable. Right now, it seems like the only acceptable relationships to publicly present to the world are being in a monogamous hetero long term relationship or being in a same sex relationship. No one cares that my boyfriend is older than me, but I do get looks when people find out that he is married. Even being a PUA would seem like it is on the margins of what is acceptable as a public identity. If you always have a girlfriend and keep having a different girlfriend every few months for years on end, I would guess that a lot of people think disparaging things about you after knowing you for a while.

        There is lots of porn of 2 guys on 1 girl. There is lots of porn about 2 girls and 1 guy. There is lots of porn about 4 girls only etc. To me, this indicates that the desire is there at some level for this kind of arrangement even though you couldn’t publicly present yourself as a person in that kind of arrangement without being a laughing stock or something.

        I am pretty sure my boyfriend’s wife would prefer to have him back in the house. I’ve heard her kind of suggest it over the phone even. I’m pretty sure my boyfriend would prefer not to pay thousands of dollars on an extra place for us when the house he owns has empty bedrooms. I don’t know what my boyfriend’s wife is like day to day, but I’m not exactly opposed to living in an extremely nice house in Greenwich village. But even though we might all prefer to live in one house, there is no chance of us giving that serious consideration because of how we would look to other people. I don’t want to be the one in a youtube video because my arrangement is so pointedly strange.

        Why only gay or hetero monogamous? Why is no other form of romantic relationship arrangement valid?

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 1:55 pm Steve Johnson

        “On the phone (from what I overhear), she sounds like a very spoiled and self centered lady, but she’s not that bright ”

        So he has a type.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 2:19 pm JironGhrad

        +1

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 3:27 pm tjic (@tjic)

        LOL! #winning

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 3:31 pm feministx

        Truth be told, both my boyfriend’s wife and I are seriously self centered. However, though I may be oblivious, I’m not dumb.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:06 pm YaReally

        Do you believe you’re smarter than her?

        And are you fully aware that you are #2, not #1?

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:12 pm What

        but you still aint the bottom b you know this, right fx

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 12:58 pm josh

        Female posters tend to bore me and I usually just skip them. But feministx,hee hee hee she different! “my boyfriend”…lozzol!!!

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 10:21 am Honcho the Aardvark

        Thread winner.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 7:51 am aleister

        I agree, threadwinner!

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 3:30 pm V

        “I don’t want to be the one in a youtube video because my arrangement is so pointedly strange. ”

        Then dont go on the jerry springer show with it.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:45 pm cynthia

        Why only gay or hetero monogamous? Why is no other form of romantic relationship arrangement valid?

        It’s not what’s about valid. Love who or what you love, whatever the fuck, who cares? There’s always going to be some group of people out there who will welcome you with open arms (although you might not want to get into polyamory, there’s a lot of dysfunctional, emotionally fucked-up people running in those circles.)

        On a societal scale, it’s about the need for controlling and managing deviancy. Restraints on behavior and lifestyles are necessary. When everything becomes acceptable, civilization starts to crumble. Absolute freedom to do anything you want is anarchy.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 9:23 pm feministx

        “On a societal scale, it’s about the need for controlling and managing deviancy. Restraints on behavior and lifestyles are necessary. When everything becomes acceptable, civilization starts to crumble. Absolute freedom to do anything you want is anarchy.”

        Why is a restraint on my form of relationship necessary? I know of only one civilization in all of the history of human civilizations that poses an official barrier against an well to do older man having both a wife and a concubine. It is a barrier peculiar to Christiandom and the modern world that grew out of it, but unheard of everywhere else. This restraint is not even an inherent part of the western world as the civilizational foundations of the western world (ancient greece and ancient rome) were perfectly permitting of the kind of relationship I am in.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 1:31 am Hugh G. Rection

        Modern Christianity is popular because it promises every (beta) male a shot at one woman. It limits the amount of women the alpha can monopolize.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:22 am Gonzaga

        Hugh E.Rection – exactly! And meanwhile we have seen many guys here declaring themselves both christian and alpha.

        Male hamster exists.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:26 am Hugh G. Rection

        Salad Bar Christians… Pick & Choose what suits you and discard the rest. Nobody can really live up to all of the bible anyways.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 1:38 pm Orion

        Your relationship is a dependable yardstick for the decline of a society. Historically the Romans were well down the road to societal collapse when this sort of thing came up. In Europe? The final true arbiter of societal health is: Are they going to be there tomorrow? Population growth trends are negative beyond the third world immigrants flooding in across Europe. The joys of kicking off all restraints on our actions are short lived because no society can exist without structure long. There is a reason CH refers to sitting poolside as the collapse comes. Because it is here.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 6:21 pm cynthia

        Again, have whatever kind of relationship you want. DO WHATEVER YOU WANT. Don’t expect familial approval, societal acceptance, or legal protection. That’s how this problem is always best solved.

        (and since Judeo-Christian culture has made possible every major advancement in human history, for reasons that are too numerous to list here, I’d offer that it’s worth keeping alive)

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:14 pm Jeremy

        Why only gay or hetero monogamous? Why is no other form of romantic relationship arrangement valid?

        It comes down to what is most likely to be stable. If a long-term, growing society is what you want to go for, you cannot beat hetero monogamous for sheer stability, its ability to let the man grow societal wealth while mothers help grow society at large (my making babies), and it’s relative ease versus trying to arrange/maintain something different.

        If, however, a long-term-stable, growing society is not important, then perhaps other romantic relationships can be explored.

        That probably sounds like ridiculously right-wing nonsense, but it’s fact. Hetero-monogamous relationships were the backbone of human society *BECAUSE* they were the best way to ensure that beta males got regular sex distracting them from the drudgery of their collectively very productive but perhaps individually uninteresting lives, and they were the best way to ensure that women did not sexually over-value themselves into marriage-only-to-alphas or non-marriage.

        You can take that away if you wish, lots of people are doing it. However, some societal decline is inevitable from this choice.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 9:32 pm feministx

        “It comes down to what is most likely to be stable. If a long-term, growing society is what you want to go for, you cannot beat hetero monogamous for sheer stability”

        You might be right, but I can’t say if you are given what I observe of history. China had great empires, Ancient egypt, greece and rome were all advanced and powerful for their time. All allowed polygamous relationships in the open.

        Christianity squashed polygamous relationships. Eventually, it must be noted that the world’s greatest and most advanced civilization grew out of the Christian world, but I still can’t say for sure that squashing the acceptability of polygamous relationships aided that growth.

        The world did not exactly fall apart when polygamy was allowed. It doesn’t exactly fall apart where homosexuality is allowed. Trad cons like to warn that society is going to decay or reach some terrible point of instability and breakdown if arrangements other than monogamous marriage are allowed, but I have yet to see any evidence of a social decay that is actually detracting from our progress in the world.

        Humanity is better off than it ever was before. With our gay marriages, with our sex out of wedlock, with our polyandrous freaks on talk shows. We have longer lives, fewer wars, better health, greater access to knowledge. Everything just keeps getting better.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 12:10 am Lionman

        The ancient Greeks and Romans were not polygamists. Many of them were definitely pederasts, and they certainly slept around just like in every other society, but they didn’t marry more than one woman at a time.

        “…I have yet to see any evidence of a social decay….”

        You must be blind.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 3:53 am thwack

        We have longer lives, fewer wars, better health, greater access to knowledge. Everything just keeps getting better.
        ———————————————————————
        Fex falls for the old “bannana in the tailpipe” routine.

        (((shakin my head)))

        People are more mentally and physically unhealthy than ever before in human history.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 10:24 am Honcho the Aardvark

        Your hamster is an Olympic athlete among hamsters. You only know enough history to be dangerous.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 6:30 pm cynthia

        I think you’d find that the polygamy was severely limited in all of those societies to men who could afford it, ie, the ruling elites. Their deviancy was permissible because a) who’s going to tell the son of Ra he can’t fuck as many women as he likes? and b) it wasn’t widespread enough to cause massive chaos. One man-one woman relationships were still the rule for most. Society can tolerate a little sexual dysfunction from the aristocrats. It can’t withstand that kind of behavior from the masses.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:44 pm passingby

        “Everything just keeps getting better.”

        Said the man as he flew downward, past the 51st floor…the 50th floor.,. the 49th floor.

        Said the spendthrift trust fund kid, as he yet again drunkenly reached into the coin purse his father had filled with hard work and sobriety over many, many years.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 7:09 pm DirkJohanson

        The more a woman refers to a guy as her “boyfriend,” the more likely it is a girl is really just a booty call to him.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 1:09 pm Mr.ADHD

      If I had a dime for every time you said “boyfriend” in real life, I can bet just from that comment I’d be a millionaire, .

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:16 pm What

        or the word “I” ughh

        fuuuuuuuuuu. there was this chick in my high school who’s every sentence started with i this i that no wonder she was fuckin weird and had no friends

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 1:13 pm gunslingergregi

      well that’s why they get sugar daddies that just give em money buy em shit and don’t fuck em ey fem?
      he he he

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:08 pm PetiteOlive

      “Strangely or not strangely, neither me nor my boyfriend’s wife likes to have sex with him.”
      Your boyfriend must be a very low beta then…

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 2:26 pm Maldek

        Good sex is the foundation of a healthy relationship.
        Without good sex everything else you may have to offer is pointless.

        Even if you would be a perfect 10, I would next you within a week.
        Your boyfriend, is certainly not an alpha or else he would have done the same.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 2:49 pm Kate

        How does a man define “good sex” ?

        [CH: If the girl he bangs is hot.

        keepin it real.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:08 pm Maldek

        “good sex” for me is when:

        a) I enjoy it
        b) She orgasms; if it is not real I will notice it.

        @CH: If she is not hot enough we wont have sex in the first place.
        How can you enjoy sex when dumpster diving?
        Relief? Maybe.
        Joy? No

        [CH: There’s hot enough, and then there’s “way hot”. Sex with a 7 is going to feel good. Sex with a 10 will blow da mind.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:15 pm Kate

        Yeah, this is more what I was thinking. So, if a woman doesn’t orgasm, the sex is not good and the man won’t want a relationship?

        [CH: That’s quite a leap of logic. Men are perfectly able to enjoy sex with women who don’t orgasm. A woman in the throes of orgasm certainly enhances the experience for a man, but her climax is not necessary for his enjoyment.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:49 pm Kate

        Well, it makes perfect sense to me 🙂

        [CH: Everything makes perfect sense when you want it to.]

        Maldek wrote: “Good sex is the foundation of a healthy relationship.
        Without good sex everything else you may have to offer is pointless.”

        I’m just trying to clarify.

        [Are you, though?]

        So, like the case that’s being discussed, he can have good sex with her at the same time she is having terrible sex with him?

        [The answer you seek is obvious, and thus your questioning smacks of insincerity. I won’t speak for Muhdik, but there isn’t a man I know who claimed to regret having sex with a sufficiently attractive woman, and who would have taken it back if he could, no matter how limply she lay during the act. You are projecting your female preference for holistic sexual pleasure onto men, choosing to misremember that men are primarily aroused by visual and tactile stimuli. As long as the smooth thighs rise to a protruding apple-shaped ass framing a pink pulsating pussy and then retreat again to a narrow waist under the watch of large, pretty eyes and soft luscious lips, a man will enjoy the sex. If he didn’t, he would quit early and make his exit mid-coitus, presumably as he was sobering up. As I said above and with which you are studiously avoiding to grapple, the presence or absence of her orgasm bears little upon the man’s pleasure, insofar as her orgasm is merely an enhancer of his pleasure, and her lack of orgasm will not detract much from his pleasure if she is hot enough to get and keep him erect.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:13 pm Kate

        Yes, CH. I really am just trying to understand.

        [CH: Then now you understand.]

        At the moment it doesn’t matter as the man who vanished on me two years ago and whom I met three years ago this week has finally gotten back in touch. I cannot believe it. He says he is going to explain everything. I hope this will answer a lot of my questions.

        [The audience waits with bated breasts.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:39 pm Maldek

        @Kate
        “if a woman doesn’t orgasm, the sex is not good and the man won’t want a *RELATIONSHIP*?”

        For me that is true. I will give her a week max.
        For CH it seems not to be the case.

        [CH: We’re not talking about me or you personally. Kate wants to know how the typical man thinks and feels. Again, for the typical man, much depends on how hot the woman is. If she’s hot, he’ll stick it out with her for a longer time regardless of her propensity to orgasm with him. If she’s marginal, he’ll upgrade to a better looking woman, or to a similar looking but sexier acting woman who truly thrills at the prospect of sleeping with him. The fact is that most men don’t much care if the women they are fucking come or not. It only becomes an issue when she regularly acts like the sex is a chore. Given enough of that dispiriting attitude, a man with options will think about dumping such a woman in favor of a woman who actually likes to fuck him. Of course, a woman who acts like she doesn’t want to be there is not going to give the man that many sexual opportunities anyhow, at which point it becomes obvious for him to consider a trade-in for a hotter burning replacement.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 7:13 pm Kate

        I am in shock. He says I am out of his league, he’s apologized, called himself a coward, etc. I hope I am ready to hear who/what he truly is if he has the courage to tell me.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 7:41 pm Kate

        My questions will go unanswered. He got married a year ago. He said goodbye and wished me well without really explaining anything except that he regrets how he treated me and that he didn’t make things work with us.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 7:50 pm Lily

        “So, like the case that’s being discussed, he can have good sex with her at the same time she is having terrible sex with him? “

        Kate, many times a woman can still enjoy sex with a man she is attracted to, even when she isn’t orgasming, especially if she knows he is enjoying her body. We all know that women don’t orgasm every time they have sex, since there are days in their cycle they are a little less sexual (from day 16 to around 3 days before menstruation resume). A woman can still orgasm during the days she is less sexual, but the man has to work harder to get her turned on, usually he has to be more physically and mentally dominating to get her in the mood. Sometimes, her man doesn’t have time for it; he just wants to get off. A feminine woman accepts quickies that satisfy her man when her hormones are low during certain days of her cycle, if she knows he’ll be spending more time on her enjoyment when she is more in the mood. A woman’s sex life is really ruled by the hormonal fluctuations she experiences throughout her monthly cycle. However, the man’s enjoyment shouldn’t be influenced by her hormones if he knows how to handle her.

        Many women get off by the idea of their bodies being used and enjoyed by the men they love, and the idea becomes very sexually exciting when the hormones start building up and they’re more sexually receptive again. The memory of him using her body when she wasn’t in the mood can fuel her sexual appetite when her hormones are so high and she is very turned on.

        An alpha knows women get in and out of the mood, so he doesn’t let a woman saying no or her lack of orgasm rule his desires and his enjoyment. If they are attracted to each other, pretty soon, they both learn how to handle each other. Maldek only gives a woman a week to get used to him? That’s alpha make? LOL! That’s assuming she even sleeps with him within a week. I know, I know, I heard it from him before – she has to sleep with him on the first date or he nexts her. In other words, he likes them skanky, and expect them to orgasm on first encounter, and if they don’t he moves on. Sounds more caddish than alpha.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 11:14 pm PetiteOlive

        @Kate, Goodluck with speaking with the disappearing man! Hope some of your questions get answered too and you are able to get some “closure”!

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 5:26 am Kate

        Thanks, Olive. It has given me closure in the sense that I wasn’t wrong about his feelings for me; a lot of people had tried to convince me he hadn’t really cared about me. He remembers every detail of our time together, started out his email that he still thinks of me often, explained how many times he had wanted to contact me but was too afraid to do so, how much he regrets his actions. It wasn’t until his last email that he told me he is now married. I congratulated him and told him to be at peace. Not that I ever expected to reunite, but it helps to really put an end to that chapter. Its really hard to hear someone you hoped to marry is married to someone else, but it does make things final. I can see now he was not the guy for me, but naturally I still care about him. I also had a chance to aplogize, but he wouldn’t hear of it- took all the blame upon himself. I don’t know that he is terrifically happy, but that is not my concern now. Hopefully I too will be remarried one day but without any regrets about my past.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:23 am Anonymous

        I’ve only ever been able to orgasm during my ovulation week, but even if I don’t orgasm my man and I still enjoy sex.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 8:46 am Tyrone

        You get used to all of them though, no matter how beautiful. Then you have to actually like the woman. Good sex for me is when there is a genuine and strong exchange of feelings, emotions, and sexual energy. Both have a lot of orgasms, lots of laughing, playfulness, etc. It usually leads to feelings of love. There is a profound qualitative difference for me between good sex with feelings and good sex for sport.

        LikeLike


      • on March 30, 2013 at 5:05 pm Kate

        Don’t be annoyed with me, CH. I appear to have offended you and that makes me unhappy. I apologize for being slow and thank you for your time and attention in responding to my questions. It is very much appreciated. I’m sure it is very exasperating to explain the same thing over and over.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:12 pm Kate

        So, sex can be “good” to a man even if she isn’t enjoying it?

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:40 pm Canadian Friend

        “…So, sex can be “good” to a man even if she isn’t enjoying it? …”

        Not to me.

        The more she enjoys what I do to her, the more I enjoy doing it to her. And the longer I want to do it to her.

        And then I can not wait to do it to her again.

        I once was with a very pretty woman, blue eyed natural blonde with hourglass figure and almost perfect c cup breasts, but in bed she was the most boring woman, she did not enjoy anything and I lost interest completely within a month.

        But then again I am not like everybody else.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:40 pm Subway Masturbateur

        No f’in way, if she’s not creaming and submitting completely it’s not primally satisfying.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:47 pm thwack

        It can be good even when she hates it; ever heard of rape?

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:53 pm Nomennovum

        Canadian friend, the problem you may have had was that you were trying too hard to please her — to get her “less boring.” When you are more concerned with a woman’s pleasure than your own, it negatively impacts your pleasure and your happiness with having sex with her. It’s not obvious, but not giving a damn and ravishing the woman to maximize your pleasure is also better for her enjoyment. It is inherently beta to be over-concerned with her pleasure. It is probably the main reason for performance problems in men.

        Kate, the answer is, “Who gives a shit?” If she can’t enjoy the mere fact of giving pleasure to a man, she shouldn’t be having sex to begin him to begin with.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 8:33 pm Sean

        I don’t much care what the girl is thinking. Never have. But I just recently started paying some attention to the girl’s enjoyment. I hope this doesn’t backfire.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 8:47 pm Kate

        Thanks everyone for this wealth of information. It is genuinely something that is hard to conceive. I guess if two people watch a movie and one person really enjoys it but the other person doesn’t, that won’t necessarily detract from the first person’s enjoyment.

        @Nomennovum: It is a pleasure to give a man pleasure, but I feel that some men have unreasonable expectations of porntopia and if you aren’t behaving that way they feel like a failure. Honestly, I would not want to be a young woman growing up in a world where guys are getting all of the knowledge about sex from porn. I am old enough that the men I should date realize there is such a concept as foreplay.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 5:02 am Nomennovum

        The purpose of foreplay for a man is twofold: 1. To turn yourself on (that is, to get hard) so you can fuck. 2, To turn her on enough so she wants to fuck you (with the added benefit of getting her lubricated to facilitate the act). Thus, both parties benefit from foreplay. A good thing, no? On the other, spending 20 mins going down on a girl so she can have multiple orgasms gets boring and is an invitation to a limp dick.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:05 am Flavia

        @Kate- hope I am replying to the right place. That is so weird about that guy- so he just up and left and got married? I don’t understand his decision to want to talk to you again though….especially if this not under the guide of starting a relationship (sexual or otherwise). He could have just said what he wanted to say on fb.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:33 am Kate

        I met him at a bad point in his life. He lived about an hour and a half away. Not long after our first date, he moved to his second home a thousand miles away to start over. We stayed in touch and saw each other a couple other times over the course of the year. Back then, I was the romantic willing to drive or fly to spend time with someone I really liked. He couldn’t figure out how to make things work for us and one day, a week after I’d last seen him, I was just blocked from his email and his phone was shut off. I never gave up trying to get in touch with him for about a year and a half because I knew he wouldn’t do it himself. Something made me try once more a week or so ago. After two years I didn’t think there was much of a chance. But, you know how time can change things. He could have said anything he wanted to say at any time. He said he didn’t have the courage to because he effed up so badly. He really did, by the way. It would have been nice had he let me know he was married in his first email instead of his last. I didn’t expect to reunite or anything, but he was using the word “us” to describe him and I and talking about me in the highest praise, called me a vision, etc. I have an unposted reply to Olive above with more details. I can tell he, like other men I know, has latched onto one particular memory of me and that is how I’ll be remembered. I don’t expect he’ll remember me forever, but it is very touching that he thinks of me now. I’m getting out of the house before I rival one of my old waterwork records. My eyes look hideous, but no chest pains! Progress.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:56 am Kate

        Wait a minute. That’s not right. I didn’t give up on trying to reach him for 3/4 of a year because then I met someone who made me realize I had to let it go or I’d be continuing to sabatoge my future.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 2:56 pm feministx

        You might, but the sexual dissatisfaction is all on my end as far as I am aware. I don’t like having sex with my boyfriend, but I still never refuse it nor do I refuse any particular sex act (though years go by between when he wants anything interesting). My fella gets what he wants sexually almost every day. For most of his marriage, my boyfriend said his wife put out at about the same frequency though she made it less towards the later years of their marriage. According to my boyfriend, his wife is just not that interested in sex. That could be true, but I know what sleeping with my boyfriend is like, so I must acknowledge the possibility that she just doesn’t like sleeping with him.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:18 pm What

        maybe you and the wife should hook up and hit it off. c’mon just give it a chance

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:09 pm gunslingergregi

        tell him to man up and just tell you when to orgasm
        told my bitch yesterday while fuckin to orgasm now
        pussy flowed out lol
        god dam she listens good he he he

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:22 pm gunslingergregi

        it was actually pretty freaky shit she that used to doing what I say

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:41 pm Dr. Zoidberg

        OMG, stop posting. Your long ass, horribly written posts about your (I assume imaginary) boyfriend and his wife are repetitive, nauseating and fucking pointless. You’re taking up space that could be used for useful advice and racism. Nobody fucking cares about you.

        At least you removed that picture of your ugly ass self so I don’t have to see Medusa Lite staring at me as I scroll down.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 8:55 pm Starets

        “…useful advice and racism.”

        That’s redundant, isn’t it?

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 9:05 pm Flavia

        Just skip her posts. Someone so candid is interesting.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 9:30 pm Canadian Friend

        “… You’re taking up space that could be used for useful advice and racism….”

        and racism?

        ha! that’s actually funny!

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 10:27 pm Lily

        What’s a thread without a little bit of racism mixed in for good measure? After all, we got to give thwack something to contemplate besides sex and rape.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 7:11 pm DirkJohanson

        She used “boyfriend” four times in that one; I’d say the odds are at least 40% that at this very moment, his cock is inside another woman.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 10:28 pm Lily

        She admitted he sees others.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 10:45 am feministx

        I have no idea if my boyfriend sees others. Don’t know. Don’t pry.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 2:31 pm What

        or gay lol

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 4:04 pm Tyrone

      What’s the problem with your boyfriend as a lover? No big O? If I knew my women thought of me that way, they’d both get nexted. A woman is never truly happy unless she’s serving her man sexually and feels a magnetic pull to do so.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 4:38 pm cynthia

      Honey, seriously, from the sound of this, you’d be better off buying yourself a dog and a jar of peanut butter.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:56 pm PetiteOlive

        lol

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 7:28 pm cynthia

        There’s so much dysfunction in the American polyamory community I’m sort of shocked it’s not viewed on the same level as pedophilia – you know, as a mental disorder. More often than not, there are serious clinical issues involved.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 9:33 pm Canadian Friend

        My guess is Feministx’s boyfriend pays for everything, food, shelter etc that is why she stays; she is using him

        which is pathetic, in my arrogant opinion…

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 10:24 pm Lily

        Spot on! She admitted a while back that these are the reasons she sleeps with him. It’s beyond pathetic.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 9:17 am thwack

        Canadian Friend takes a three-two pitch, swings… connects… long drive to deep center field…. going, going, going, GONE!

        That ball is outta here!

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 9:45 am feministx

        Presently, I want to leave, but I have to get it together a bit before I can. I need to find a place, figure out my move. I like my boyfriend for every reason there is except for that I now outright dislike having sex with him. I don’t really care that my boyfriend buys my vitamins or has me on his cell phone family plan (with his wife on it too). I have a perfectly fine job (albeit a boring one) and I could easily get that stuff for myself.

        However, can you really blame me for the fact that some percentage of the reason I like my boyfriend is because he gets me a number of things which are completely out of my budget and social circle? Put yourself in my shoes. When I was 26, I went to Europe with some girlfriends from college on my own dime. We had a great time, but we had to save up and rely on our credit cards somewhat to stay at hostels with shared bathrooms. Then I became 27 and my now boyfriend enters the scene and insists on taking me to Europe on a business trip. On the way back, he rented out an entire chateau overlooking 130 acres of private land just for us. He told me, “are you ok with this because my wife would have hated this because it’s not close to any city center. We’re in the middle of nowhere.” And I’m like “so…I got my own bathroom…?”

        But that’s not the only reason I like him. I admire him, I like to converse with him and I am highly reliant on his micro managing nature (for better or for worse). The last quality is probably what makes it really hard for me to leave.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 10:32 am Canadian Friend

        Ok so you stayed in a chateau for a few days and had your own bathroom , and he pays for your cell phone,

        Are those things worth the awful sex you hate having with him?

        You sound miserable judging from what you post here

        why stay in relationship that makes you miserable?

        Keep him as a friend – which is what he is to you anyway as you do not love him at all – I’m sure you can stay friends and then find yourself a man closer to your age who you will love and will enjoy having sex with.

        You are too young to be stuck in a bad relationship where the sex is making you depressed.

        and think about his, your already old boyfriend will get older and more repulsive and the sex will get more disgusting

        It is time to take a new direction, at your age there are a million good things that can happen.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:05 pm Maldek

        You are a prostitute mylady x.

        Makes perfect sense, the whole issue of having sex with your boyfriend. A lot of people dont like their jobs or going to work in general, you are not alone.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 6:16 pm cynthia

        The sex is much, much better at hostels. And the company’s better too. Should have given it a second chance.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 6:32 pm cynthia

        Oh, and forgot to add – I’ve never sucked a man’s dick for pwesents, and I never will. Where I grew up, we called girls who performed sex acts for money whores.

        LikeLike


      • on March 30, 2013 at 10:13 pm feministx

        Well, it’s a poor comparison to compare me to a prostitute because my relationship with my boyfriend doesn’t resemble that at all. Firstly, you pay the girl to leave, not just for sex. My boyfriend wants me to stay. We have had a monogamous relationship for years now.

        I love him. I love him for his talent, the way he applies his creativity to everything he does, for the way he looks and for the way he takes care of me. And I do admire him for the fact that he became successful in life financially and otherwise. Not everyone has that ability. I am sorry that the sex has gotten worse and worse to the point where I cringe at it.

        I love him, so I want him to enjoy sex with me. I figure it’s a few minutes out of my day. I just have to lay there. It’s not going to hurt me. And he has such a smile on his face when it is over. I like to see him happy. I feel like I can’t do much else to make him happy, so I am glad that I can offer at least this which is meaningful and important to him.

        Everyone knows women are generally attract to financial success in men to some degree. Somehow it is taboo for an individual woman to say, “a reason I like this man is because of his financial success and the life that affords me.” It’s silliness just like it is taboo to say x race is born with some ability.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:56 pm Kate

        Just start putting a plan together and start saving your money. You’re in an urban area; you can hire anybody to do anything: moving men, life coach, therapist. If you can’t find anybody, I know someone who can help counsel you. Take little steps and they’ll eventually take you where you need to be.

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 1:49 am Hugh G. Rection

      Here’s my two cents: Assuming you are telling the truth, both you and your boyfriends wife are bums who are just leeching off of him. He’s a loser and an idiot for putting up with you two freeloaders. A match made in heaven.

      As long as you provide the sex instead of the wife she’ll be fine with sharing the loot. If you get a third girl in the mix who picks up the slack sex wise she’d want to oust you because you’re useless to her.

      Leeching off of men without wanting any obligation in return, you madam are a true feminist.

      LikeLike


  12. on March 28, 2013 at 12:07 pm peckerwood

    no sound, but just from the still photo, you could see one guy leaning back, the other guy leaning in. Then, she smiles soooooo supportively at the right hand super beta as he reaches in to listen but she scooches her cooch closer to the guy on the left and she breaks the handholding contact with the guy on the right.

    LikeLike


  13. on March 28, 2013 at 12:07 pm Blessent

    I like long red hair audience girl at 1:35 not even looking at this farce. Probably checking out a union camera-man and wondering when she can get out of this disaster and get a drink near Times Square.

    LikeLike


  14. on March 28, 2013 at 12:10 pm Mel Gibson

    I’m at the point where I’m conflicted on being angry at men like the schlub on the right or just laughing them off. Glad it’s becoming the latter moreso than former.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:27 pm corvinus

      The definition of “beta” (or especially “omega”) = “more chicks for us”

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 4:15 pm Uncle Elmer

      What if you saw your ex-wife with a pack of them? Angry or jovial?

      PS, I liked Apocalypto

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:28 pm Canadian Friend

        And I liked Braveheart but he is not Mel Gibson,

        this is the internet…

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 7:35 pm gunslingergregi

        its because its the internet that it could be him lol

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 9:36 pm Canadian Friend

        True, some movie stars probably participate in comment sections of blogs

        their life can not be Hollywood partys and orgies everynight

        but I doubt they would use their real name

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 1:51 am Hugh G. Rection

      So how ’bout those Jews, Mel?

      LikeLike


  15. on March 28, 2013 at 12:10 pm JM

    Would you really go so far as to call baldie an omega? As thoroughly bizarre as this arrangement is, the woman at the center of it appears to be a solid 6.5. Surely she was in the 7-8 range when the first man met her 10 years ago, probably even when baldie met her pre-child birth 4 years ago.

    The attractiveness of this woman is really what makes this a curveball scenario. If you saw a picture of this woman with the man on the right when they first met 10 years ago, you’d surely think of him as alpha. Likewise, if you heard the story of baldie meeting and impregnating this attractive woman, six years into a concurrent relationship, surely you’d think of him as alpha. Throw in the element of all three of them agreeing to live with one another, one of them as a bona fide cuckold, it’s awash.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:10 pm PetiteOlive

      Everything you said. She is very attractive and looks wise is at least 2 points higher than either male.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 2:39 pm Maldek

        Mr. brown pants is not bad looking but his body language and words reveal his inner lesser beta dom. He could be a good doctor though, with decent income and social status.

        Baldius is much more relaxed, stronger in his mind. I would give him greater beta. He is not an alpha because the only 2 reasons for accepting the beta are
        a) beta bucks
        b) Beta is handling the household instead of wife

        Both reasons an alpha would handle.

        The wife on the other hand is kinda hot. At least for me 40year guy she would be bangable. She got a few extra pounds around her hips and her breasts may have some gravity issues but all in all I would still give her a 7. 10 years ago most likely a solid 8 in my books.

        What makes her special is her skill to get both of these men as pets. Her own male-kitten-toys. A female dream come true. Does not make it less repulsive for me but it is an achievement nevertheless.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:28 pm corvinus

      She looks like a foreign-born Latina to me, which would mean the dudes are even less alpha than if she were a native-born American.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:49 pm kleyau

      Alpha fucks, Beta bucks. Baldie is alpha. He cuckolded a man, and that man still sticks around to support his woman and child. It’s like all these guys that boast about ONS’s or fucking some hot chick with a boyfriend. This guy doesn’t even have to hide the fact that he’s fucking what another man thought was his chick.

      Baldie: “You’re feeling sad, honey? Go tell Bob about your day.”

      Baldie: “I’m horny, let’s fuck.” When they’re done, “Go to talk to Bob, I’m taking a nap. Make me a sandwich first.”

      That’s why Baldie is leaned back like he owns the place, and looks like he could give two shits about the situation.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 3:43 pm corvinus

        Not quite alpha. He’s more alpha than Hugs’ brother, but the fact he moved in with her without her 86ing Hugs’ brother makes him a beta.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:32 pm Inane Rambler

        He’s beta because he’s sharing his woman with another man.

        Nah, that’s more like Gamma, but YMMV

        LikeLike


  16. on March 28, 2013 at 12:11 pm Ace Haley

    Very obvious who the bitch in this ‘relationship’ is

    LikeLike


  17. on March 28, 2013 at 12:11 pm earl

    That woman has more testosterone than the 3 men combined.

    LikeLike


  18. on March 28, 2013 at 12:12 pm Anonymous

    I think most of us could tell who the omega was just 10-15 seconds in, from only judging each man’s body language.

    LikeLike


  19. on March 28, 2013 at 12:14 pm Dr. Zoidberg

    My money is on the two dudes are fucking each other too.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 12:47 pm YaReally

      Yep. Or rather one is fucking the other.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 1:00 pm What

        RAPE! AIDS!

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 2:36 pm corvinus

        Exactly. The dude on the right could be Hugs Schwyzer.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 6:45 pm deadliftman

      I thought so too. The dude on the right clearly seems feminine and is probably at least bisexual. It’s his needs that needed to be met haha.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 9:09 am lorem ipsum

        If I met him on the street, I’d figure him for gay. It takes a certain kind of…male to have a stranger move in, knock up your old lady, and not go texas chainsaw massacre.

        LikeLike


  20. on March 28, 2013 at 12:18 pm dannyfrom504

    I threw up in my mouth a little. Beta/omega doesn’t even cover it.

    Pussies is a better description. She needs a prostrate exam and they “guys” need a pap.

    LikeLike


  21. on March 28, 2013 at 12:23 pm tz2026

    Every carousel needs at minimum one stallion.

    To get physical, remember, the alpha particle is a HElium nucleus.

    LikeLike


  22. on March 28, 2013 at 12:32 pm PM

    I like the turn-of-phrase. Polygamy = bad, anti-equalitarian but Polyandry = free-spirited, organic, dynamic, B-U-T-Ful.

    “get my needs met”
    “get my needs met”
    “get my needs met”
    “get my needs met”
    “get my needs met”

    Man, what a dangerous thing the hamster-unchained is!

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 12:54 pm gunslingergregi

      yea hamster with no rules is a wild thing
      tame the hamster use it for your own ends

      LikeLike


  23. on March 28, 2013 at 12:32 pm Anon

    That lady looks familiar. I swear ive seen her in a youtube vid on org–m during pregnancy. I thought she was a bit “earthy” when I saw it. If it’s the same girl this just confirms it.

    LikeLike


  24. on March 28, 2013 at 12:36 pm Anon

    Mmm, yeah, i dont know what the rules are on link posting, but she’s under Liberatorvideos. I’d bet $ it’s the same girl, but her hair’s longer.

    LikeLike


  25. on March 28, 2013 at 12:38 pm gunslingergregi

    I got my little monster in bed sleeping right now she got that shit for last month and both men kiss her ass
    moved her husband into another dudes house lol
    dude kicking her out cause when she with me everyone else gets cut off
    she tried to be sneaky and get her shit moved back into my place when I told her she ain’t movin in
    she like she getting apartment in 2 days
    had her pack her shit and then was like naa you ain’t movin in wait till you get your apartment
    he he he
    I guess it feels good when she with me i’m enough to satisfy
    otherwise when not she got 8 dudes on the line
    her putty swollen and red it didn’t come like that he he he

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 12:51 pm gunslingergregi

      oh well I think I am the alpha beta omega and sigma

      LikeLike


  26. on March 28, 2013 at 12:42 pm Flavia

    I can’t watch it with the sound on at work. so am judging based solely on body language.

    The one on the right is the lesser beta?

    First thing, he was touching her, in a girly way. Mate guarding but non sexual. Then when she put her hands on him it was sort of like, “awww my cute puppy, im reassuring you.” He was also hunched over- which is the “listener pose” which is submissive- “i am leaning in to hear you”. Alphas would sit back-if you want to be heard, speak so they can hear you.

    The other guy was relaxed, leaned back in a dominant but care free stance, no mate guarding and very confident. He’s not worried about the other dude.

    A good rule of thumb if a bald guy is alpha/higher beta….if the first thing you notice is NOT that they are bald.

    LikeLike


  27. on March 28, 2013 at 12:48 pm RappaccinisDaughter

    OK, thought experiment: On several occasions on this blog, I’ve seen the host as well as commenters describe their ideal/actual situation as a “harem” or “soft polygamy.” If there are enough people who are living that way, the inevitable result is a number of males who have no access to relationships with women (well, women who aren’t prossies, anyway). That sort of thing doesn’t tend to work out well for those “excess” males in particular or society in general.

    So, if the ideal situation for the alpha male is to have a harem of women who are faithful to him and only him, and who accept that he is not faithful to them…what to do about the excess males?

    You can see the answer in polygamous societies like the fundamentalist Mormons. They drum up excuses to eject young, low-status males from the community. That works fine when you’re talking about relatively small numbers. But if it becomes endemic to an entire society, what then? Polyandry could be one solution. After all, which is worse: No woman at all, or having one on time-share?

    I’m actually not attempting to claim that it would work on a large scale. Polyandry doesn’t seem to be a particularly effective evolutionary strategy, and cultures that allow for it are vanishingly rare. (I believe there’s one in Africa, but the circumstances are usually that the woman’s sister has died, and so she has to take the brother-in-law in.)

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 1:59 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

      Interesting thought experiment, @RP. I’ll play. Evolution blindly tries everything sooner or later, but polyandry will not catch on where there is polygyny. As the treatise on love by aweful bore explains (see sidebar menu), men are culled and the progress of men genetically is accelerated relative to women, which explains why sometimes a societal mass of civilized men only can made a civilization. Polyamory would happen first for the nonelites as a common arrangement, but men are designed (mostly still, despite psyche conditioning) to fight and cull themselves one way or another. Civilization collapses (or declines, it’s slow until the glorious conflagration), or at least the affluence and the population collapses or declines. As NWO would have it, an orderly adaptation and culling would be a ‘transformation’, but people will still be culled, even if happily domesticated. Men and women have more than opposite polarity. We have opposite resistances to the same things like an array of diodes.

      RD, are you dreaming your new and improved American Dream, or is you alpha enough? 🙂

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 2:31 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        You and Mike (below) key in on the same solution: War to cull off the excess male population. I’m not one of those “war is not the answer” people–in fact, in my opinion, frequently war is the ONLY answer–but I would hate to have it happen for that reason.

        And no, Reality Doug, polyandry sounds exhausting. I much prefer the “heterosexual male to be my romantic partner” and “gay best friend to be my emotional tampon” model.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 2:40 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

        War? Run by whom? If war happens in the SMP and at work, etc. then ‘war’, but no I don’t mean war. I mean conflict in the ecological sense. Betas mustered to fight betas, thinking they are rules-of-engagement following alphas when they are natural selecting for pencil-neck alphas?…please. Now civil war or patriarchs making war, that is way different. Civilization is organic since made of people, and people are evolving and can’t progress unless evolving more civilized which means there must be culling, by the free market or by overt violence, but it must happen or civilization does. Conquest by people or by more productive producers, it just has to happen somehow continuously in the small or in large balloon payments. Can run from rebalancing in your lady mind, but ya can’t hide in real life. That does not prevent some people living a lifetime of bliss and leaving the mess for others, i.e. Ted Kennedy.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 2:45 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

        @RD Apologies on ‘lady mind’. NAWALT in your case. Read you post too quickly. My inner game needs some work. I let myself trigger a stock response to your comment. Bad form.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 2:51 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Trust me, I’ve heard much worse, although I thank you for your apology all the same.

        Gotta go. My reservation on the range is in 10 minutes and I can’t find my damn Walker’s Game Ear for the life of me.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 3:31 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

        If your range looks like a MSM studio doing an omega promo special, you are in the right place. Law Enforcement Targets, Inc. should be made to redesign their “No Hesitation” targets me thinks.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:07 pm Mike

      Wars, plain and simple. Have too many males with nothing to do and not enough women to satisfy them? Start a war with the neighbor, tell the boys that they can kill the males and keep whatever females they want, and watch the problem population leave. Not all of them will survive the war, of course, and the ones that do now own the conquered land with, presumably, allegiance to the home state. This is why the gender imbalance in China is so fucking scary. If they had the transportation abilities (ships, planes, etc) they could easily overwhelm a portion of the US just via sheer numbers of crazy, female-deprived young men.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:16 pm SFG

        I think they’d go for neighboring countries like Vietnam first. The US would be…difficult. China wants to make money, not conquer the world, and certainly not destroy it in a nuclear exchange.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:10 pm corvinus

      There is an argument for low-status women to share a few low-status men, since betas and omegas are common as dirt nowadays

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:44 pm gunslingergregi

      the guys who don’t get chicks go gay

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 3:44 pm corvinus

        Since most guys that I’ve known of who do go gay seem to have been omegas or lesser betas before being recruited, you’re undoubtedly right

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:23 pm What

        here’s a question, have you ever seen an alpha gay?

        [CH: Yes. Alpha gays share these traits with alpha straights:
        dismissiveness
        commanding presence
        teasing expertise
        cutting humor
        recklessness
        aloof attitude
        quick kino escalation (not personally experienced, thank the lawd)
        impatience with dullards and bores]

        wonder how it would compare to a hetero beta/alpha or if the comparison can/is even 1:1 straight across the board from gay-hetero

        [see above. Some comparison is apt, but it’s not 1:1. Gay alphas will tend to be more feminine/shrill/extroverted than straight alphas, all else equal.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:34 pm corvinus

        here’s a question, have you ever seen an alpha gay?

        There’s one I know of, but a lot of his friends are straight guys and he also regularly bangs women.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:50 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        That’s a bisexual, corvinus, if he regularly bangs women.

        Actual gays–alpha or not–may or may not have some experience with women. (Oddly, I’ve discovered, many of them are really into boobs. I have one gay friend that, if given 3-4 drinks while we’re hanging out, WILL motorboat me. Just out of nowhere, just stick his face in my cleavage and blub-blub-blub away.) But they prefer men and don’t bang chicks regularly.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:33 pm Unending Improvement

        Most gay men have bisexual tendencies.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:00 pm YaReally

        I met a lezzie alpha chick once (hot petite little rocker girl, not butch at all, I was trying to pick her up lol).

        It was pretty funny/surreal. After she told me her deal early in the night, we shot the shit for a bit but she was on a mission that night and was straight-up about being on the hunt for pussy.

        Saw her throughout the night escalating HARDCORE on other chicks. This was a normal 18-23 club so the girls there were all either straight or curious-when-drunk etc., but she was attacking everything hot. She’d have them pinned up against the wall 30 seconds in and be up in their face locked eye-contact whispering shit while the girls would giggle “omg omg!!!” like deer in the headlights not sure what to do but super turned on and you could tell they were curious (or rather she MADE them curious) and that the lezzie chick knew what she was doing and had done it a jillion times before. She was stone cold sober and just in complete control of the situation at all times.

        It was pretty impressive, no lie lol and I’ve seen a lot of amazing players in action. She was just really efficient/streamlined and had complete belief in her own omnipotence.

        She only went for the hot girls, and she didn’t give a shit if the set was mixed or if the girl’s bf was there etc (probably cause she knew no one would kick a cute little chick’s ass). So her look/demeanor was girly, but her intent assertiveness kino escalation etc was super alpha in the way that good male players I know are.

        She had a very obvious mindset of “sure this is considered a “straight” bar by normal people, but I can get any one of these chicks, they’re ALL bi-sexual to some extent” which is something I’ve found over the years myself. Very few girls are straight up grossed out by other chicks…most are curious in the right circumstances but will act like they’re grossed out if they’re around judgemental people, and some that think they’re grossed out or not interested just haven’t met a sexy chick who knows how to flip their switches. This chick seemed fully aware of this which I would assume is from a lot of field experience “converting” girls.

        I’ve also met some alpha gay dudes, as well as beta ones. The alphas very clearly stand out in contrast, for the reasons CH typed up above. Alpha is a mindset, it’s not based on a look/sexuality/possessions-owned/etc. The interesting thing is that the alphas are divided into two categories, the Clint Eastwood type alphas you’d imagine where you wouldn’t even guess they’re gay, but there’s also the super flamboyant gay alpha who’s just able to take over a social setting and work group dynamics etc social butterfly style in an alpha way (much like how Russell Brand dominates the world/people around him).

        Anyway, no problem with gay people. You can’t go out in the field regularly socializing and meeting new people without running into them (by introduction through social circles or by fluke) and learning that they’re like anyone else: most of them are cool, some of them aren’t, and they can’t help what makes their genitals tingle.

        No place for homophobia, racism, etc in legit pickup. If you still judge people based on that stuff, you haven’t met enough people.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:22 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        You know, YaReally, of all the people who post on this blog, you’re the one I’d like to party with. You’re the one I’d like to introduce my newly-broken-up-with-and-very-sad-and-shy-hot-girlfriend to.

        You sound like genuine fun.

        Haters, take note.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:22 pm corvinus

        YaR, you should have gotten her to be a wingwoman for you. Might have certain advantages over a wingman, if you catch my drift.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 7:12 pm Test E. Cool

        “Anyway, no problem with gay people.”

        If your preference is to masturbate in another man’s feces over sexual intercourse with a woman you most certainly have a problem.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 9:31 am yeahokcool

        @yareally. agree 100% on your last paragraph. obviously, that’s a pretty unpopular opinion around here, tho. too bad.
        @rp. your response is classic chick-projection. and it showcases why yareally is the (ya)real(ly) deal. it isn’t your “friend” that you want to introduce to yr, it is you, yourself. yr talks about how he is able to lull women in a zone of comfort and non-judgment. here he is show casing that it works on the message board as well as in real life. haters should take note.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 12:18 pm Harry Morgan

        Lesbian and bi girls can be incredibly direct and aggressive if they know what they’re doing, and get away with a lot that men can’t. I know a very attractive and generally feminine lesbian with game almost exactly like you described. I also dated a bi-girl for a while who also ran game just like this a few times to try and pick us up a plaything for the night (would have worked if not for cockblocking friends).

        It’s pretty fun to watch.

        LikeLike


      • on March 30, 2013 at 3:28 am Test E. Cool

        “No place for homophobia, racism, etc in legit pickup. If you still judge people based on that stuff, you haven’t met enough people.”

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_scotsman

        Shove your leftarded logical fallacy.

        LikeLike


      • on March 30, 2013 at 3:57 pm YaReally

        @rappacini
        thanks. And I would have the 3 of us making out with eachother before you finished our introductions.

        @corvinus
        I figured i would have held her back. It would be like having Bruce Lee spar with you. It’s nice of him but it’d be a waste of his time. I was happy to just witness her doing her thing. It’s kind of like when you meet a natural “in the wild” and you don’t want to give him game advice because what he’s doing is working for him and you don’t want to disrupt that magic he’s doing.

        @Test E Cool
        You are an idiot.

        @yeahokcool
        The racist homophobes around here who disagree with me can suck my nuts lol also I dig your comments in general btw, you clearly know your shit.

        @Harry Morgan
        I think the stakes are higher for them so they HAVE to be good at it. Us guys piss & moan that we have to approach and seduce a gender that’s INTO the genitalia we have. Like, girls WANT dick, and we whine about having to approach. Imagine if you were only attracted to lesbians, like that’s the only thing that got you hard, so every approach you did you had an uphill battle. You would be forced to adopt some pretty solid mindsets to overcome that.

        @test E Cool
        Your mom told me your dad is a shitty lay, but he gave good head to me so I think she’s just jealous.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 7:06 pm icebergslim79

        @YaReally
        I have a close friend that is a player lesbian and I think you’re a little off on your assessment. Women that are trying to pick up other women are given more latitude. She can be much more aggressive than most men can get away with (likely because there’s little threat of rape) and can make more (and larger) mistakes without being punished (losing value etc). Knowing about the plasticity of female sexuality allows them to hit on all women. The level of skill required as a woman picking up women is much lower than is necessary for a man to do the same thing IMO.

        LikeLike


      • on April 6, 2013 at 1:17 am FBF

        But how do you keep another girl from yanking your girl right out from under you? And how do you save face if you do get alpha’ed by a woman (since if theyre making out everyone’s going to see what happened)? I can’t win all of them but this is a slap in the face I’d really like to avoid. Seems like something that would be worth its own article.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:18 pm gunslingergregi

        then again guys who get em to easy seem to go gay too lol

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 9:02 am Tyrone

      Emotions are too strong for it to work. Jealousy would lead to murder.

      LikeLike


  28. on March 28, 2013 at 12:49 pm Flavia

    BTW I have heard learned of this new phenomenon called cuckold porn. What men do you think are attracted to watching that? Beta rage guys? Or is it that the guy puts himself in the place of the cuckold-er? The internet is getting too weird.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 1:03 pm Scott

      If you read the comments (yes, porn videos have comments) there’s always some dude that says “i’d love to watch that guy fuck my wife”

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 1:43 pm chris

      I suspect the fetish is a product of

      a) having aggression, violence and will the to dominate thoroughly socialised out of the male, and
      b) sperm competition.(and the various psychological mechanisms that would go into facilitating sperm competition)

      If the guy can’t go apeshit might as well go bonobosexcrazed.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialization

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm_competition

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:06 pm Canadian Friend

      “… The internet is getting too weird….”

      I wonder if people have always been that weird and we only see it now because of the internet?

      or if people are getting weirder?

      I would think we are getting weirder…as sadly we are a civilization in decline

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 3:49 pm Jack Amok

        The Internet simply allows the handful of weirdos around the world to virtually congregate in one place, making it seem like there are lots of them.

        [CH: Yes, but there is likely also an increase in weirdos, or at least an increase in toleration of loud and proud weirdos. Thought experiment: Drop the internet into 1950s America. Give the shocked people a few months to acclimate. After ten years would there be levels of online weirdness comparable to what we see today? I doubt it. The American people have changed, and not for the better.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:52 pm cynthia

        I think it’s due to an ever-expanding definition of what’s considered “deviant”. Things that were extreme before are being normalized, so one has to go further and further out to find things that are still kinky and, therefore, sexually exciting.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:49 pm Starets

        The frog that is us has been on a very long, slow boil.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:32 pm PetiteOlive

      I have always wondered too about this “cuckoldry” phenomenon….as far as fetishes go, this is one of the most bizarre (to me). I mean it is one thing to be unknowingly cuckolded but what kind of man derives pleasure from seeing his wife rammed by another man?

      [CH: A total loser.]

      Is it a form of power and control?

      [No. It is a form of powerlessness and lack of control.]

      Is it alpha?

      [No.]

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:02 pm Canadian Friend

        This is one of those times I wish my English was better, here I go anyway,

        this growing phenomenom of cockholdery – enjoying watching someone else f*cking your wife – is very similar to white liberals enjoying watching our civilization being f*cked by illegals and third world immigrants.

        I would think they are both symptoms of the same mental disorder.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:53 pm Starets

        Yeah, it probably is a related mental disorder. Probably also related to the liberal silence and toleration in the west of the rape epidemics committed on white women by our colourful newcomers.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:06 pm Anon

        The bastardized evo psych explanation is that those guys have an over-competitive hindbrain and they get a rush from the idea of having their seed competing with another man’s.

        Maybe masculinity gone wrong, like autism.

        But it could also be pure self-destruction. Their brains realize somehow that they’re genetically worthless material and set them on a path to evolutionary death.

        [CH: The latter. Cuckold fetishists are closer in psychology to suicidalists than to sexual thrill-seekers.]

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 9:03 pm whiskeysplace

        My guess is that it is directed towards women fantasizing a big, dominant Alpha male. Instead of their kitchen bitch husband.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 4:14 am thwack

        is it any different than guys who watch sports religiously, but never actually play or participate in them?

        With whom is the “cuckholdee” really identifying with?

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 11:12 am Fred Stone

        Cuckold porn is basically porn in general. Any guy watching porn is being cuckolded by the guy fucking the porn star girl in any video. This is not a phenomenon. It’s just new to you.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:50 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      Rule 34. “If you can think of it, there is pr0n of it. No exceptions.”

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:12 pm whorefinder

        [thinks hard about pron involving Rappacini’sDaughter and a clown mask]

        [waits 10 seconds]

        [searches jizzonline]

        Eureka!

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 9:11 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Does that clown mask make my butt look fat?

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 10:30 am whorefinder

        Post a pic and we’ll judge you. Harshly.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 9:11 pm Flavia

        Yeah, i learned that lesson the hard way when I subscribed to a bunch of pregnancy subreddits. Spoiler alert – they weren’t for pregnant women. I can’t even wrap my head around it…there’s nothing less sexual than a preggo chick.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 9:38 pm anonface

        A fat preggo chick

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 10:05 pm thwack

        Goats with boats?

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:16 am Flavia

        Good point.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 6:38 pm whorefinder

      I remember reading a supposedly true story about a couple that engaged in a live-action cuckhold fantasy. It was a white SWPL dude and his wife who’d hit the 7-year-itch point. 30s-40s.

      Anyway, said dude had LONG fantasized about seeing his wife plowed by a black guy. His wife wasn’t into it at first, and then he made her watch the porn with him till she she got turned on by it (note: sexuality is malleable). FOR YEARS.

      So, after years of just WATCHING, and him getting off really hard each time on the fantasy, they finally found some big black stud from a swinger’s club to plow his worthless whore woman.

      And all leading up to it, till the moment she’s getting railed, SWPL dude is hotter than he’s ever been.

      Then, suddenly, he’s watching his wife getting fucked and hearing her moan for ANOTHER MAN while he’s just sitting there like a bitch watching. Suddenly the fantasy sucks to the SWPL dude. Suddenly his dick goes soft and he gets angry and he’s just a bitch. He HATES it.

      SWPL and wife agree never to do it again. And then, of course, she leaves him.

      It’s a SWPL phenomenon—weak men whose sexuality is twisted up by feminism and pro-darkyism.

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 2:13 am Hugh G. Rection

        I think it fits in the guilt and self-hatred theme that those lefty SWPL types have going on all the time. Getting emasculated is just another way for them to atone for their imagined crimes. Same probably goes for the manginas who let their girlfriends fuck them with strap-ons or marry a feminist.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 8:15 am Flavia

        Yeah, I think it’s just a perversion of their normal sexual appetite that they feel they cannot channel through proper means. I.E. They feel guilty for oppressing women or whatever so this is a way to get off where they are the victim and the woman is the aggressor.

        Hmmm. Kind of makes sense now.

        LikeLike


      • on March 30, 2013 at 3:50 am Hugh G. Rection

        I knew the psychology degree from the University of Laos Nigeria was worth something.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:55 am RappaccinisDaughter

        I read a similar story that was submitted as a “Dear Prudence” letter. The letter-writer was the cuckold, and he was writing because he was angry at his wife–who had resisted his fantasy for YEARS before finally agreeing to do it–and wanted to leave her.

        Normally I’m not a big “Dear Prudence” fan (I mostly read the column to get my daily dose of Vitamin Hate), but the dressing-down she gave that punkass was pretty epic.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 10:32 am whorefinder

        Might have been the same story. The details of it are fuzzy.
        Also, RAPE!

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 11:25 am RappaccinisDaughter

        There was an even better one (I suspect that some of the better “Prudie” letters are fakes, to tell you the truth) about this guy who decided he wanted to try swinging. He finally talks his wife into it, and of course he’s got this couple all picked out: Super-hot wife and kind of overweight, schlubby husband. He figures he’s in for the time of his life, and his wife won’t wind up having too much fun and he won’t have to be jealous.

        Until they all get into the bedroom, that is. Then the Schlubby Swinger drops trou. Turns out there’s a reason he’s got such a hot wife: He’s hung like a damn donkey. The letter-writer was furious because his wife was screaming and moaning for Schlubby Swinger in a way she never had for him, and it was so upsetting that he couldn’t perform for SS’s hot wife.

        Cue Nelson Munce’s “HA HA!”

        LikeLike


  29. on March 28, 2013 at 1:03 pm Red Pill

    Rock bottom and sinking fast…

    LikeLike


  30. on March 28, 2013 at 1:06 pm Fred Rotten

    Spot the Beta Male?
    Alas, it is I, for knowing deep down that I ought to kill myself after watching that clip, yet ultimately finding myself too squeamish to pull the trigger.

    LikeLike


  31. on March 28, 2013 at 1:09 pm Fred Rotten

    CH, your description of the hamster is one of the funniest things I’ve ever read.

    LikeLike


  32. on March 28, 2013 at 1:25 pm Rico

    So in essence he futily waves his spoon at her ice cream cone.

    LikeLike


  33. on March 28, 2013 at 1:31 pm gunslingergregi

    it is fucked up on nice guys finishing last plumber dude has his own company prob making 150k a year tried to hook up with my bitch
    called her couple weeks after we broke up
    wanting to date her and shit
    she said she thought I was setting her up and didn’t do nothing with him
    the fuck
    this dude can’t get no play in pussy
    cept having like 20 cats
    I guess now I know why he did all the free shit at my house he he he
    didn’t get him anywhere though
    got to make a bitch jump through hoops for you

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 4:45 pm gunslingergregi

      that’s bad when you can’t pick up a crackho
      there can’t be a god

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:56 pm gunslingergregi

        she off the crack though shrugs

        LikeLike


  34. on March 28, 2013 at 1:42 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

    Great post. This is education. However, I don’t believe subcivilized women have any limits to how far they will cannibalize or enslave men. They are inept masters, as history hath shewn. I think it’s the men who limit the prevalence of these arrangements. That broad is nearly every woman once she believes she can ‘have it all’ and takes off the mask of propriety and claims an even higher station in society: from she-child to self-made bitch-master. Go, girlfriend! Grrrl powa.

    Anderson said, “It would not fly in Ohio.” <– Hate speech only if someone without fem cred says it. Anderson is certifiable.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 2:11 pm corvinus

      beta fucks and omega-plus bucks, dat is how she rolls

      LikeLike


  35. on March 28, 2013 at 1:44 pm denialist

    was going to say “let live and leave poor freaks alone”, until I watched it. Holy shit it’s repulsive. Take note nice guys – this is, granted extreme of the spectrum, but how “beta” looks and makes even men feel. This is 400 pound whale, but you as a normal shlub, still are a chubby 4.

    LikeLike


  36. on March 28, 2013 at 1:52 pm Lovekraft

    How could anything related to an afternoon gaytalk show be considered alpha?

    LikeLike


  37. on March 28, 2013 at 2:00 pm Tilikum

    that fucked me up to just watch

    LikeLike


  38. on March 28, 2013 at 2:27 pm AlexandraHamilton

    This “couple plus” was on a weird show called Strange Sex (it’s on Netflix). The dynamics were even more obviously repulsive there. The guy on her left just literally runs around taking care of the other man’s child and being a nanny/maid while the other two screw upstairs. The one on her right basically slacks off and pretends to be a musician while the bottom one earns the money, from what I recall.

    I don’t understand what would make a man do something like this. Ever.

    [CH: Proven right… again!]

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 4:10 pm whorefinder

      Someone get that man a red pill.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:14 pm AlexandraHamilton

        I re-watched the 10-min clip of the episode. Some quotes:

        Gia: “This is John’s [lesser beta] domain – the kitchen”

        John: “When I was younger, I was so romantic and wanted that plain old boyfriend-girlfriend relationship, but it just wasn’t happening.”

        Ian [greater beta]: “I don’t feel in competition at all with John.”

        John, on her getting pregnant by another dude: “I could have sat around my whole life and moaned and been angry. But I didn’t want that. I didn’t want to hate her, I didn’t want to hate the baby… I see him [baby] as another part of Gia”

        —

        I just don’t understand why any person would humiliate themselves in this way for a couple of pity fucks a month. Surely some things are worse than celibacy. But then again, I don’t have a male sex drive.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:27 pm gunslingergregi

        Gia: “This is John’s [lesser beta] domain – the kitchen” ””””””””
        yea all you guys who lurv cooking

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:45 pm V

        “I just don’t understand why any person would humiliate themselves in this way”

        The poor bastard has no self respect and not enough confidence to GFTOW. Oneitis to the extreme, with the limiting belief that he has zero other options.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:52 pm AlexandraHamilton

        Even if he actually had no other options, I would think there is still some kind of limit. To rephrase Patrick Henry: Is sex so dear, or so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains or slavery?

        There are always hookers. That’s gotta be better than her once a month pity bang plus endless humiliation. Or so I would think.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:48 pm whorefinder

        Is sex so dear, or so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains or slavery?
        —Sex made men build everything in society. Warped correctly, it can be. But this little turd is so sad his sex drive is neutered—and he’s “happy” about it because, like a woman, he’s confusing sex and love.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:51 pm whorefinder

        A combo of extreme swallowing of the blue pill (leftist dogma) combined with an extremely lower self worth to begin with. I am guess this lesser omega is a no-father kid whose mother was a crunchy-hippie-feminazi—crunchy hippie so as to make sure that “free love’ became indoctrinated and twisted in him to this.

        I have a few acquaintances who are almost as lowly as these two guys. Shorter, less attractive men, they never had an area they excelled in—so they never got any self-esteem. Both are from classic no-father-hippie-feminazi mother modes.

        One I think I’ve bucked up from lower omega to upper omega, simply by yelling at him when he acts this squeamish. He once had a guy lean over and take his drink from him at a bar—no we didn’t know the guy—and my buddy almost just shrugged it off and bought another one. I had to tell him “you either yell at that guy or I’m gonna beat you up.” My friend finally said something and the guy apologized and bought my friend another drink.

        But even so, i could see either of my omega buds shruggingly getting into a relationshit like this if the girl asked for it.

        So sad.

        LikeLike


      • on March 30, 2013 at 4:44 pm facepalm

        http://www.andersoncooper.com/2011/11/02/the-right-to-love-as-you-chose-understanding-a-polyamorous-relationship/

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:16 pm AlexandraHamilton

        Oh, and this gem: the greater beta guy is the only one anymore who goes out and dates around for additional partners.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:53 pm whorefinder

        “In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is king.”

        This is like when cult leaders are discovered to be major losers growing up, but they find even bigger losers in life to follow them. Like those King of the Nerds types who get the least ugliest chick at the San Diego Con, or the guy who gets the most pussy at BBW convention. Or (and this is for thwack and nicole) the guy who has the most black gfs.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:02 pm AlexandraHamilton

        http://www.brobible.com/girls/slideshow/hottest-women-of-comic-con-2012

        There’s at least a few hotties in that bunch, come on!

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:15 pm whorefinder

        Yeah, but around 3/4 are there b/c Comic Con has grown in popularity (i.e. more nerds) and therefore photo ops for more fame (Adrienne Curry, Olivia Munn, take a bow) or else hired by various companies to promote products.

        Second, the 1/4 there on their own are at the bottom of that barrel and have major MAJOR issues.

        Think about it this way: what kind of girl has mostly straight guy friends? Manipulative bitches who like a circle of betas around them worshiping them. So those voluntarily showing up to these events are psycho head cases who need constant male attention for approval, but aren’t hot enough to be strippers/ wear skimpy clothing all the time.

        And, finally: those ones who are attractive and ARE looking for fun are only going to go for the least ‘spergy, most attractive, most alpha men there—i.e. the male models hired by companies to model superhero outfits (see the Dr. Manhattan dude from those photos), or the celebrity guys there to promote their latest movie/TV show.

        So the King of the Nerds will only get the girls too ugly for a celebrity/male model to want to pity-screw, or their sloppy seconds.

        Like I implied, poor pickings.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:33 pm corvinus

        True, that type of convention would attract girls who like to wear costumes. Regardless, they are not likely getting a lot of alpha attention.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:55 pm AlexandraHamilton

        @whorefinder (couldn’t find the reply on your comment)

        I really wouldn’t know since I’ve never been to Comic Con. I just like x-men comics and dress like a hooker day Halloween, so I thought the two could be combined, lol.

        Then again, I have mostly straight guy friends, so maybe I have major issues. They say I am a pretty good wingman (woman?).

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 2:36 am Hugh G. Rection

        I imagine most of them are vicious, attention whoring cunts. I wouldn’t be surprised hearing them complaining about getting leered at later or even harassed by guys who never got to see tits in 3D. Just because she dresses provocatively does not give omega males the right to look at her, right?

        And then there’s the type girl who has mostly (or only) straight male friends, which usually means her personality is so insufferable that no woman would hang out with her, so she just gives off enough of a whiff of pussy to her orbiters so she can feel like a person who’s interesting or pleasant to be with.

        Most of those bitches are fairly plain looking, especially when you were to put them in a room with real hotties. It’s a good way for a 6 to feel like a 10.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 6:35 pm cynthia

        The explosion of crap like Harry Potter and Twilight, along with the hot-boy casting choices Marvel’s been making the last few years, has been pushing geekdom further and further into mainstream culture. The girls are getting caught up in it, too. Go to Tumblr and search “Chris Evans”. See what comes up.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 11:16 pm Nicole

        Some guys here just have a bad case of sour grapes. If it’s not accessible to them, they say something has to be wrong with it. It’s the male hamster.

        LikeLike


  39. on March 28, 2013 at 2:29 pm Bort

    visceral disgust is all I can feel watching this

    LikeLike


  40. on March 28, 2013 at 2:32 pm The cuckolder

    Wow, just… wow. I know certain men will put up with a lot to get sex but living with another guy who is plowing her regularly is just mind boggling. Celibacy seems better than having to put up with that crap. I’ve been banging a married woman for years now and even that feels weird knowing another guy does her too. At least he doesn’t do her in the ass like I do, that makes it more bearable.

    LikeLike


  41. on March 28, 2013 at 2:47 pm earl

    Forget her hamster…what kind of gamma rabbit does that dude on the right have?

    LikeLike


  42. on March 28, 2013 at 3:03 pm Trimegistus

    It’s funny how our progressive elite will snicker about Mormon polygamy, but treat these repulsive hipsters as an “alternative lifestyle” to be celebrated and encouraged.

    It’s not creepy if THEY do it.

    LikeLike


  43. on March 28, 2013 at 3:10 pm Opus

    I’d get my needs met if those two guys would go outside with their revolvers and do the only decent self-respecting thing. What an uber-bitch, and what a massive Hamster (which I think I could just see reflected in the studo lights). Glad I guessed right from the first second.

    LikeLike


  44. on March 28, 2013 at 3:11 pm Anonymous

    Off topic question I thought the commenters here could shed some light on: why do girls hate other girls that act sweet/demure/feminine? They make fun of them and call them prissy and goody-goody and all gang up on them to make fun of them. Why? I also think this is a reason that modern women don’t want to act feminine. The girls who start out with a natural femininity and sweetness get made fun of and end up not having any friends and not fitting in. The “cool” girls, although usually pretty, are always full of sarcasm and attitude.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 5:09 pm Canadian Friend

      Despite what feminists say, girls are mean.

      Often worse than men.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 5:14 pm cynthia

      There are a couple of things at work here that all kind of tie together.

      One, hatred. Women hate other women who are in competition with them for anything – grades, men, recognition at work, whatever. Woman A, therefore, will react negatively when presented with Woman B, if Woman B displays characteristics that are more likely going to land her a higher-quality man. In some cases it’s subconscious that Woman A perceives Woman B as a threat, but sometimes not. I think we all instinctively understand that a pretty, feminine woman is going to win out over some pant-suited career bitch. Thus, hatred.

      Two, jealousy. If Woman A has swallowed blue pill feminism and is a miserable, childless whore, and Woman B is red pill, happy, feminine and in a committed LTR, that’s going to fry Woman A’s jealousy circuitry, thus creating a shitstorm of fury. Even if she doesn’t realize that what’s happening in her hindbrain.

      Three, socialization. There is a serious problem with this, but it’s not what the libs want to claim it to be. Femininity is brutally removed from little girls, starting in elementary school. You’ve got at least two generations of females in this country who’ve been taught that they can’t follow their instincts and claim their own natures. I think this causes a lot of angst and self-hatred in women, because we’ve been taught our entire lives not to accept ourselves for what we are. Thus, when Woman A sees it in Woman B, she’s not going to be able to keep her own internal anger from spilling out.

      Four, herd mentality. Women are going to ruthlessly destroy any woman who goes against popular opinion. There is nothing more terrifying than what happens when a group of females deciding that another female is an apostate to the overarching female culture. I think we actually get a lot of satisfaction out of the act of destroying one of our own. Since femininity is defined as being the opposite of what we should be, something that’s not culturally acceptable, any woman who displays it is automatically subject to the claws of her fellow women.

      That make any sense?

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 6:02 pm Starets

      Decades of feminist indoctrination. Also, look at the behaviour of young women in popular TV shows. It is almost entirely bizarrely nasty behaviour. That is watched by girls from a young age, and has to have an effect on how they are socialized to behave themselves.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 10:05 pm Canadian Friend

        Because women don’t have physical strength like men do, they have developped psychological warfare.

        Psychological warfare leaves deeper scars except that you can not show them on front page of newspaper like when a woman has a black eye from her angry husband.

        Boys learn to settle with fist fights, girls use psychological warfare.

        Most boys when they were in high school got into some kind of fight, they survived

        while a lot of girls were harassed by other girls until they developped some dysfunction such as anorexia and never completely recovered

        I can’t possibly save links to everything I read but this was studied by psychologists and once they become adults most men say they have no emotional scars from the fist fights they had as teenagers while a high rate of women have emotional scars from the cruel treatment they got from other girls in high school

        Feminist are full of shit, they lie trough their teeth; women are worse than men, meaner and more violent.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 3:02 pm Starets

        I agree, but the innate tendency for females to use psy-war tactics has been greatly exacerbated by the decades of feminist and girl power propaganda. Instead of a sane society exerting some control on women to get them to be more civilized, we have a dysfunctional society encouraging their worst instincts.

        LikeLike


  45. on March 28, 2013 at 3:14 pm Anonymous

    I thought this discussion was going to segway into the Supreme Court issue of gay marriage. Obviously if they are going to give gays the right to marry, these people should be right there demanding that a “pro-gay” decision would also sanction polygamy and polyandry.

    Are these people trying to remind everyone that polygamy at least is far more popular a concept than gay marriage.

    LikeLike


  46. on March 28, 2013 at 3:30 pm becominganders

    “I felt like I just couldn’t fulfill her.. A certain role”
    Wow. Just, wow.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 3:45 pm corvinus

      The role of actually (gasp!) having sex with her, he means.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:10 pm whorefinder

        I can’t imagine such patheticness.

        “Honestly, dude…toss a football around or something. Jeez.”
        ——Satan, South Park

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 4:17 pm SFG

      Who here thinks he had some sort of age-related erectile dysfunction problem and preferred not to get divorce-raped in addition to cuckolding?

      LikeLike


  47. on March 28, 2013 at 3:58 pm whorefinder

    These three losers are the antithesis of RAPE:

    1 fag and 2 omegas.

    Heaven help us.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 6:04 pm Starets

      3 fags and 1 fag-hag.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:17 pm whorefinder

        And Anderson Cooper, super-fag, knows that sexuality is malleable deep down, so is really excited that this kind of derangement exists. Eventually, the lesser omega will be so down and manipulable that Cooper and his fag-buddies and bugger him—more gay sex!

        Fucking degenerates.

        LikeLike


  48. on March 28, 2013 at 4:07 pm Lily

    These are the type of legalized relationships we have to look forward to if gay marriage is legalized in this country. All types of abomination are going to be considered, and when enough people start demanding them, they will be legalized.

    • 3 or more people want to get married, hereby legalizing polygamy, bigamy, and polyandry.
    • Siblings want to get married, hereby legalizing incest.
    • Other close relatives want to get married, hereby legalizing incest.
    • Humans and their pets want to get married, hereby legalizing bestiality.
    • Children molestation by gays, lesbians, and other sexual deviants will follow.

    All this while straight sex is considered atavistic and out of fashion. What a mess!

    Don’t be surprised that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah will follow this country too if gay marriage is legalized.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 4:38 pm corvinus

      Don’t be surprised that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah will follow this country too if gay marriage is legalized.

      I’m thinking more along the lines of a population crash.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:55 pm cynthia

        Remember, there are hard-core libs out there who don’t have a problem with the human race dying out.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:04 pm whorefinder

        True, except libs always forget that it’s the very people they shit on—straight white conservative christian men—who keep Western society alive and safe through sacrifice. And they’ve been shitting on them for about 200 years now, growing louder each day with their shits.

        Then they’ll face anarchy without guns or food or the men necessary to spit upon his hands, raise the black flag, and start slitting throats.

        Anyone who chooses the red pill can see how leftist policies hurt society and are bankrupting it, the blue pill crowd just sticks their fingers in their ears and doesn’t hear you. And, similarly, blue pillers refuse to see the evidence that the only thing standing between them and barbarism, slaughter, and slavery is the very group they’re trying to erase.

        SWPLs be fucked, you. Fucked by themselves and deliberate ignorance.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:53 pm cynthia

        IDK. Maybe the libs know that it’s the straight, hard-working, productive white guys who’ve built modern society, and they just don’t care.

        The problem with liberals is always the same; they reject human nature, they reject the realities and necessities of civilization, and think their superior, enlightened minds can create utopia.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 7:11 pm thwack

        whorefinder
        libs always forget that it’s the very people they shit on—straight white conservative christian men—who keep Western society alive and safe through sacrifice.
        ———————————————————————–
        Could the Earth survive a greater number of white people than it has today? Maybe the libs are on to something?

        (sorry, I’ll get my coat)

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 10:10 pm Canadian Friend

        Yes Earth could survive the people who invent and discover new more efficient ways of doing things ( example; solar energy was not discovered in an African mud hut ) especially since those people are a minority on this planet.

        It is non-whites who are reproducing like rabbits.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 9:38 am thwack

        Let me clarify my point Canadian Friend. What would happen if everybody on Earth lived like a white person? Is there enough oil for everybody to drive a car? Live in a big house?

        There would be a nuclear war once a week…

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 4:54 pm corvinus

        Let me clarify my point Canadian Friend. What would happen if everybody on Earth lived like a white person? Is there enough oil for everybody to drive a car? Live in a big house?

        There would be a nuclear war once a week…

        True. How much shit does any person need? Maybe if there was a large family involved… but white people don’t have large families any more, and those who do are great at economizing.

        This generation, however, seems to be making more of a point of living small, partly due to student loan debt, the housing crash, weak economy, etc.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 4:56 pm Lily

        Population crash, that too. The entire Greek empire collapsed when gay sex became the norm as opposed to male-female marriage.

        In reality, there is nothing new under the sun. Human beings have tried and thought everything again and again. We keep repeating the same old mistakes. It appears that every generation must repeat the mistakes of the past because it refuses to remember the experiences of older generations.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 8:13 am Gonzaga

        Greek EMPIRE? There was not such a thing in history.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 8:51 am corvinus

        Well, one could argue that the Alexandrian empires (Alexander’s, Ptolemaic, Seleucid, etc.) and the Byzantine Empire were Greek empires.

        She means the Greek city-states, especially Athens and Sparta. The Peloponnesian War definitely helped things along, though: a micro World War I & II.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 10:29 am Lily

        “She means the Greek city-states, especially Athens and Sparta.”

        Exactly!

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 3:17 pm Starets

        Both Athens and Sparta had empires prior to the Macedonian Empire. The Anabasis has sections detailing the influence Sparta had at the east end of the Mediterranean. Their is one section where they have to negotiate with a Spartan officer who is essentially the governor IIRC Byzantium or another city in that region.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 3:20 pm Starets

        Also, both the Athenian and Spartan empires were very impressive due to the fact that it was such a small population that conquered and controlled much larger populations and land masses. Similar to the British Empire.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:33 pm Anon

        WHITE population crash.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:41 pm corvinus

        Yeah, us first, then the East Asians, then Latinos and South Asians, leaving Africans the last group by default. Depressing.

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 5:27 pm earl

      “Don’t be surprised that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah will follow this country too if gay marriage is legalized.”

      The destruction started when women got the right to vote.

      If anything this country will go down in flames because of Roe v. Wade.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 5:54 pm whorefinder

      Agreed. Lily, you are a clear-thinking woman. Note how rare that is. This is why I think we need to repeal the 19th Amendment: too few women like Lily.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:09 pm Lily

        I hate to admit it, but women are becoming the source of all evil in our society. What happened to the simple wisdom that women used to have in earlier times? A Woman used to be the most trusted advisor of her husband, now she is his downfall. Is it any wonder men don’t want to marry women?

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 7:23 pm cynthia

        I think women have always had these qualities, but the basest parts of our natures are allowed to run rampant today and nobody’s allowed to say anything against it. There’s always been evil there, sad to say.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 8:14 pm earl

        ” What happened to the simple wisdom that women used to have in earlier times?”

        Aliens abducted the women and sent back feminists.

        LikeLike


  49. on March 28, 2013 at 4:20 pm kolo

    “when a woman has ten men, she has one man” this is a quote from a eastern euro woman i heard from james marshall. it is a candid exposing of how a woman gets different things from different men in order to get all of her needs met. i would have thought that ideally they would all be wrapped up in one ‘super man’ that can play all the roles, but that may not be possible or optimamal for the woman evolutionarily, because what if that man died, if she could spread her risk across different men, it would not be such a hit if one of them dropped off. having said this, i do think that very few women have a limited amount of time to capture the services of multiple men, but i would say if they could have it their way that is how it would be.

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 8:26 pm passingby

      If she has ten men, her kid will have no father.

      LikeLike


  50. on March 28, 2013 at 4:23 pm VAL

    wow, that was quite repulsive. wonder if male #2 brings them breakfast in bed

    LikeLike


  51. on March 28, 2013 at 4:28 pm Johnycomelately

    Ahhhaahhh!!

    Goes to show two omegas don’t make an Alpha.

    I hope to goodness the lanky guy is bisexual and they all get AIDS.

    LikeLike


  52. on March 28, 2013 at 4:31 pm Uncle Elmer

    Saw these people on 20/20 or some such with ForiegnBride a year or two ago. It was crap like this that got me to convince her cable cost was a plane ticket home every year, and we should switch to youtube with its almost limitless content. Use an HDMI cable to hook to your big flatscreen and the video quality is very good. With youtube “playlists” you can put on some theme and let it rip for hours. Such as “Vietnamese Dac San” which I recommended on an earlier post, or Laurel and Hardy’s “Sons of the Desert”, seen here in its entirety :

    LikeLike


  53. on March 28, 2013 at 4:59 pm blaaa

    I think it’s cute. I wouldn’t mind having two boyfr.iends/husbands. And neither should be “alphas,” that would be annoying

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 6:07 pm Starets

      Be quiet and get back in the kitchen!

      LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 6:17 am itsme

      And neither should be “alphas,” that would be annoying

      not annoying, sour grapes. you wouldn’t be able to land one alpha, much less two.

      LikeLike


  54. on March 28, 2013 at 5:12 pm Greatest Beta

    Poor beta dude thinks this is the best he can get

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 5:25 pm Inane Rambler

      If he had her on his own, she would be. By far.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 5:39 pm Anon

      That’s rich from a guy raising another man’s bastard.

      LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:48 pm Greatest Beta

        Wealth effect rich?

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 5:59 pm whorefinder

        Don’t bother; dude’s way beyond help. The only thing that will shock his system into the light (and it will happen) is when he comes home and his Oneitis is in bed with some darky. He’s not omega enough to become like in this video; instead, he’ll just snap into reality. And, assuming he doesn’t murder them right there, he’ll come into the full reality of the Red Pill. So we can spoon it to him all we can in little bits , or else it’ll be shot, full force, right into Jack’s Medulla Oblongata.

        Won’t be pretty. I really feel for him when that moment hits. But it’s his own fault for not heeding the warnings.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:10 pm Greatest Beta

        So what am I supposed to do? Dump my girl cuz she has a daughter?

        Here’s what I do know: the woman kept her physique after having birth. She is a very good mother, dedicated and has sacrificed tremendously to give her daughter the best life possible. Has a degree, has a good paying job. Her family assists with their grand daughter and even the father is in the picture helping emotionally and financially.

        This is the first time I’ve ever dated a single mom, I always said to myself I’d only do it if the girl was amazing in many ways. I’ve had several gfs since i was 19 and they were for the most part immature little cunts.

        You guys call it oneitis I call it being loyal to another human being. I have spiritual rules that I abide by. I can pick up no prob am in excellent shape have money it’s a matter if choice. In fact I used to cheat on my LTRs like it was nothing but around age 25 I changed my ways feel million times better for it.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 6:48 pm corvinus

        …and even the father is in the picture helping emotionally and financially…

        Yup, you’re pretty much in the same situation as Baldy in the video, except that the daughter is the previous dude’s rather than yours.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 7:00 pm Greatest Beta

        No, we don’t all live together.

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 8:10 pm gunslingergregi

        give it at least 4 years or so dude
        to let the oneitis disapate some

        LikeLike


      • on March 28, 2013 at 10:16 pm Canadian Friend

        Greatest Beta,

        If she knows your father is a multi millionaire, she is not with you for love.

        Most women love money more than anything.

        LikeLike


      • on March 30, 2013 at 12:17 pm Kate

        I disagree. If she has a good-paying job and gets child support from the father, his family money is not necessarily a motivation.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:33 am Tilikum

        you got this girl on a pedestal so high you can hardly reach her dude, ergo why you are getting so much shit.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 9:49 am Greatest Beta

        Rule no 1:
        Never pedastalize the pussy.

        As soon as you do that she’s GONE.

        I’m not as amateur as you guys think. Quite the opposite.

        Just the other day I let her know in a calm manner that I can replace her very easily, that I have all the resources a woman can want, am in great shape while the guys my age are getting chunkier.

        Strong tactic: I still keep in contact with my orbiters and she HATES it lol. All women from the beginning attempt to push away the orbiters (but they keep theirs unless you call them out hard). By keeping your orbiters in mid orbit it gives you some insurance plus keeps her on her toes.

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 2:53 pm Tilikum

        How much time are you spending keeping her? That’s my point.

        LikeLike


  55. on March 28, 2013 at 5:33 pm Bort

    What is with the brazen loudening of gay marriage advocates lately? Is it their default issue when there is no recent school shooting to finger point about?

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 6:44 pm corvinus

      Pretty much. They keep falling flat on gun control and amnesty for illegal aliens, so the deconstructionist noisemakers are concentrating on this.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 7:20 pm cynthia

      Possibly something the MSM prefers to report on, rather than examine why Napolitano is buying billions of bullets for DHS? Distraction tactics?

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 12:04 am Mr. Clean

        Cynth–Your pathetic attempts to think are surpassed only by your cartoonish paranoia. You’d have to be important for the gubmint to want to gitchoo. .

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 10:47 am Canadian Friend

        Then what is your explanation for this?

        DHS Won’t Answer Congress On Billion Bullet Purchase

        http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/032213-649114-dhs-wont-answer-congress-on-ammunition-purchases.htm

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 6:13 pm cynthia

        Nothing to do with paranoia. I just question the ability of that lesbian bitch to keep our borders safe. No money to keep the Mexicans out, but plenty to spend on bullets for no identifiable reason? Further proof she needs to be investigated..

        LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 9:28 pm Uncle Elmer

      It’s a done deal at this point. Gays will now gird their loins for the next big fight : same-sex fiance visas.

      LikeLike


  56. on March 28, 2013 at 5:59 pm Lily

    It’s very hard to find quality male-female traditional relationships anymore. Most heterosexual relationships are dominated by women and are not male-lead, which leave both men and women dissatisfied. Most female-lead heterosexual relationships end in divorce, that’s a fact. Yet, most people don’t realize the reasons behind their unhappy sex lives. That’s why they start looking for other answers, along the lines of these nonconformist aberrant sexual arrangements, which lead to more dissatisfaction, not to mention a complete breakdown of society. The culture is so messed up that no one even suggests that perhaps going back to traditional sexual roles could be the remedy for most of the sexual unhappiness experienced by most people these days. Most psychologists and sex therapist (or should I say quacks, cuz that’s what they really are) wouldn’t even think to promote a common sense approach, such as traditional male-female roles in a marriage. Instead, they encourage experimentation with these abnormal sexual arrangements, and even celebrate these arrangements and call them the “modern family.”

    I can only see a complete breakdown of society form here on. The only reason society survived for thousands of years of human evolution is because sex was regulated within an acceptable boundary – marriage, or at the very least male-female relationship. In other words, sexual morality. With feminism and gay sex becoming acceptable, we are beginning to break all the rules and boundaries of sex and be plunged into complete uncivilized debauchery and chaos. For the left this is welcomed news, since it never bothers to think deeply about the ramification of social change. Anything anti-traditional is celebrated by the left, as it seeks to break down all old-fashioned time-tested traditions and replace them with profane impure values. Don’t be surprised when we, the few who still hold on to moral purity, are seen as regressionists and throwbacks, while the morally contaminated are celebrated as the mainstream.

    LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 6:53 pm corvinus

      Don’t be surprised when we, the few who still hold on to moral purity, are seen as regressionists and throwbacks, while the morally contaminated are celebrated as the mainstream.

      You don’t think we’re at that point already?

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 8:13 pm earl

      Oh well…while the pervs engage in their debauchery…I’ll stay on the moral path and live a more happy and more fulfilling life.

      And I’ll have a big smile on my face…while all the drones continue to walk through their anger filled lives.

      LikeLike


    • on March 28, 2013 at 9:00 pm gramps

      I have to agree about the gay marriage stuff. If I had time, I would go to D.C. and parade around with a sign by the Supreme Court: “After Gay Marriage, then What?”

      One reason why fewer and fewer man do the male authority marriage thing I believe is because they would feel ridiculous. This is the 21th century. We have all been programmed to see females as equals to males, if not superior. Having a woman who wanted to be lead around would seem like a a throwback. You would doubt her emotional make up. Most men have never even been trained to lead a woman. Never experienced it. Even if the guy provided all the financial firepower, he wouldn’t dare lead her because he fears she would revolt and just take all his stuff on the way out the door. So, he tries supplication. She becomes his partner and best friend. He is deluded. She is miserable.

      Don’t worry one bit about society. Worry about yourself.

      Keep things in perspective. While bemoaning the decline and fall, think how much better you live today than your grandparents by virtually any objective measure. You take all our modern miracles for granted. Indoor plumbing, effective health care, clean water and sewage, and so on. They weren’t so common just a few years ago.

      LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 4:28 am thwack

      anyone who spends 300 words to avoid say “weJ” deserves to end up on the ash heap of history.

      (((shakin my head)))

      LikeLike


  57. on March 28, 2013 at 6:04 pm Brandnewperson

    I have nothing intlligent to ad to the conversation. I’m just surprised nobody mentioned the vagina growing off the lesser man’s neck

    LikeLike


  58. on March 28, 2013 at 6:24 pm realmatt

    I’ve seen this stupid woman before. She is some kind of sex therapist/maybe surrogate and she was on another talk show where she claimed she can have an orgasm by herself using only her mind.

    LikeLike


  59. on March 28, 2013 at 7:04 pm DirkJohanson

    Anderson Cooper looks quite nonjudgmental in this snippet, in stark contrast to how that human piece of excrement behaves in spots about sugardaddies or paid sex.

    LikeLike


  60. on March 28, 2013 at 7:15 pm Spot The Lesser Beta Male « PUA Central

    […] Spot The Lesser Beta Male […]

    LikeLike


  61. on March 28, 2013 at 8:12 pm senseiern

    Neither male looks like Lee Marvin nor Clint Eastwood.

    LikeLike


  62. on March 28, 2013 at 8:12 pm christianmorris

    This is simply appalling. The body language says it all – at one point she even swats him away.

    But of course, never forget: the major tell is who the woman chooses to have fertilise her eggs. That is the relative alpha in the nest here.

    Why the fuck does Lesser even stick around? How does he benefit from this?

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 9:24 am corvinus

      There’s a good chance he’s one of those cuckold fetishists.

      LikeLike


  63. on March 28, 2013 at 8:17 pm christianmorris

    Anderson Cooper makes me more ashamed to be gay than any straight man ever could.

    Chateau and contributors – us fags aren’t all like Anderson Cooper. Please believe me

    Honestly.

    LikeLike


  64. on March 28, 2013 at 9:46 pm Ronin

    -At least the Tokugawa-period Japanese had Seppuku.

    .
    …Now where is that dang-old Miyamoto Musashi at, to do for these men what they’re too weak and dishonorable to do for themselves?

    -Just before he ragebangs the absolute hell out of that fembomination;
    in front of their flensed and burning remains.

    .
    The only Five Rings these people need are the ones that are anchored to a scaffold at the other end.

    LikeLike


  65. on March 28, 2013 at 9:58 pm Paul Gay

    I couldn’t even watch that. I saw this ‘trio’ on tv a couple of years ago. The whole thing makes me cringe (perhaps because I am in sympathy with the dude). Does this make me beta, lol?

    OTH, I can’t figure out if the bald dude is in a good arrangement. For some guys it seems to be a good deal to let your gf kiss some dude from time to time in exchange for a live in maid/nanny.

    LikeLike


  66. on March 28, 2013 at 9:58 pm avd

    New product launched to help betas get more sex from their land whale females: http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2013/03/28/company-releases-new-bacon-flavored-condoms/#ixzz2OriHQTSs

    LikeLike


    • on March 30, 2013 at 12:27 am Nicole

      :: buys the 100 pack ::

      LikeLike


  67. on March 28, 2013 at 9:59 pm Rum

    Ah, fuck the loser-guy. Not everthing can be fixed. You gotta move-on.

    LikeLike


  68. on March 28, 2013 at 11:29 pm avd

    I’m simply going to share something here from my own experience, which is in no way intended to refute any other poster/commenter on this site. Just sharing, that’s all.

    Talk of not caring about a female’s orgasm is baffling to me. For me, personally, that’s the only reason I desire sex. If I want to cum, I can simply jerk it; a female is not required.

    I fuck females for no other reason than the joy provided to me by their orgasm. I train my bitches to cum the way I like it, literally teaching them how to cum in a way that I desire. Deep moans, breathy sighs, and high-pitched childlike squeals, sucking my cock with her pussy, spasms, squirting, etc. Across the spectrum of their cum, I literally direct symphonies. Rhythm, beat, melody. I fuck females because they are beautiful, and I can compose beautiful symphonies through them… which gives me incredible joy.

    It’s a momentary respite from the world of men (warfare).

    Females WANT to be instruments of MEN. I give them that pleasure, and demand that they execute to my satisfaction. They cum WHEN I tell them to cum, and they cum HOW I tell them to cum. It’s for ME, period. I fuck females to generate beautiful symphonies in by abode. This benefits ME, in the same way that playing classical music through my stereo benefits me.

    It’s spiritual, in the sense of uplifting humanity (of which I am a part).
    If your only goal is to dump a load, then you might consider some deeper introspection into your existence (animals also have this instinct).

    A female properly and musically cumming on your cock, AT YOUR DIRECTION, is second to none. Simply blowing one’s wad pales in comparison.

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 12:23 am Test E. Cool

      Another anonymous claiming title of the Bach of sex…

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 5:23 pm corvinus

        I laughed.

        But, the real Bach had two wives and 20 children, so maybe he was the “Bach of sex” too

        LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 7:41 pm gunslingergregi

        dam that’s badass

        LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 10:18 am gunslingergregi

      nice post nice control

      LikeLike


  69. on March 29, 2013 at 12:05 am Bucho

    Sadly, this isn’t the first time I have seen something played out like this.

    I knew a fella in college that had already followed around his ex-girlfirend to other 2 different schools for who knows what reason. At some point during all this school hopping, she had a child with his best friend. When I met him he, for some reason, was room mates with the ex and, if I remember correctly, his best friend (the baby daddy). I would say, to his credit, towards the end of this whole fiasco, he wound up finding another girl, but she ended up treating him like dirt. And then after a while, kicking him to the curb. Yet he still ended up following this girl around like a lost puppy dog.

    What’s even sadder is that he told the whole story like there wasn’t anything strange about it. Then he would go on talking obsessively about how he was going to meet up with ex #2 that night and watch “Charmed” and whatever other chick-drama was popular back then. Even when we’d bust on him for this whole charade, he would just giggle and make up some excuse, and play it off like we were jealous.

    I think this this goes beyond alpha/beta behavior. I think there is something wired wrong in these guys heads, whether they have ingested too many chemicals over time and numbed there brain, or there is some underlying mental illness that is being improperly (or not, all together) treated. Especially with the guy on the right, who just seems numb to the whole situation.

    And shame on Anderson Cooper for parading this in front of the masses.

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 11:36 am Matt

      I have a friend who is pretty similar to yours. He became a LJBF with a single mom. He spent the better part of two years chasing this woman. She had him babysit her daughter, he slept at her place twice a week, etc. But he never got anywhere with her. Every single time I told him that he was being played, he always laughed it off and did whatever she told him. He thought he was getting somewhere.

      Finally, I met her. She didn’t like me. I called her on her shit. She had him dancing on a leash in his own home, while I glared at her. It was depressing that she started trying to impress me during the three hour time I was there. The end result was that he temporarily saw reason a few weeks after that and dumped her ….. right before staying “friends” and still seeing her once a week.

      I think you’re right that men like this have some kind of flaw. My buddy was abused when he was a kid and has a history of finding unstable women to placate.

      It’s always the same pattern and these see nothing wrong or abnormal about it. Other men that do this always have the same personality and pattern. It’s depressing to watch.

      LikeLike


  70. on March 29, 2013 at 5:00 am yaser

    My guess is that the older guy is rich and has erectile dysfunction.

    OT:

    First we had “no is no”, then “yes is yes”, and now we have “Quantum Consent”, meaning that you can’t even know for sure even if she says yes.

    http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/2012/04/19/quantum-consent

    Don’t miss the first paragraph of the comment from June 1, 2012 at 2:22 pm

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 8:32 am Gonzaga

      our muslim invader is here, not to dissappoint

      LikeLike


      • on March 29, 2013 at 1:12 pm yaser

        Confused, please clarify.

        LikeLike


  71. on March 29, 2013 at 6:08 am Anonymous

    Look at the dude’s expression of barely contained disgust at :49. Granted, no self respecting alpha would be caught dead on AC/DC360’s show, but even an emasculated SWPL can get an occasional twinge from his shrivelled, vestigial manhood.

    LikeLike


  72. on March 29, 2013 at 10:01 am Rick Derris

    At least the chump isn’t as bad as Bennett Beeny from the Judge Dredd comics. The loser wuuuuvvved his object of desire so much that he became a tranny to keep her memory alive, even after she shot him down to go become a cum dumpster of some Che Guevara style thugs

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_%28Judge_Dredd_story%29

    LikeLike


  73. on March 29, 2013 at 10:27 am Man

    This is infuriating and no laughing matter. It is simply another bullet in the day marriage agenda. Trying to reach the sheeple that Any selfish personal choice no matter how disgusting is acceptable.

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 10:30 am Man

      Gay. Teach. God damned fucking iPhone.

      LikeLike


  74. on March 29, 2013 at 10:47 am derickburton

    JC wept. This is the year that cuckold culture goes mainstream, folks.

    LikeLike


  75. on March 29, 2013 at 12:54 pm Pronunciate

    AlexandraHamilton said:
    http://www.brobible.com/girls/slideshow/hottest-women-of-comic-con-2012
    There’s at least a few hotties in that bunch, come on!
    =======
    Yeah, cons (conventions) for comics and anime and such can have hot girls, just check out the costume contests. This girl would be welcome:
    http://signorpompelmo.blogspot.com/

    LikeLike


  76. on March 29, 2013 at 3:33 pm misterinfinite

    That made me feel sick to my fucking stomach.

    LikeLike


  77. on March 29, 2013 at 3:55 pm Nicator

    Fucking leftists need a bludgeoning.

    LikeLike


  78. on March 29, 2013 at 4:48 pm yaser

    In India, they kill female children, so there is a lack of women.

    LikeLike


    • on March 29, 2013 at 4:53 pm yaser

      India

      The practice has continued in some rural areas of India.[98][99] Infanticide is illegal in India.[100]

      According to a recent report by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) up to 50 million girls and women are missing in India’s population as a result of systematic sex discrimination. The UNICEF study has been criticized by the Indian Medical Association for utilizing outdated data and for deliberately demonizing Indians for the purposes of politics

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide#India

      LikeLike


  79. on March 29, 2013 at 6:29 pm aspic

    Fuck you Anderson Cooper. Fuck you.

    LikeLike


  80. on March 30, 2013 at 12:17 am avd

    Responding to classical dipshit from previous thread:
    (Expected cliché) dipshit fool: I’m not “claiming title” to anything. Boasting for an anonymous crowd who I will never meet doesn’t make any sense; it’s completely illogical. I posted that comment with the intention of encouraging men to aspire to higher standards in their life. Shoot for the stars, and you might just hit the moon.

    You’re exactly the type of dipshit that is ruining this blog. Look at your self-belief: being the “Bach of sex” is outside of your reality, therefore you mock it. The truth is that the reality I described actually exists for men who do the work. I AM the “Bach of sex” with the females in my life. I have actually been told by those females that I am a “Mozart at sex,” “that I have reset the bar of standard,” “that I’ve blown their minds” as to what is possible sexually, etc. I could give a shit about these accolades… as I mentioned previously, it’s for ME, NOT them. Nothing I do is for a female; it’s ALWAYS for ME, and they appreciate that. My relationships with females is exactly as I described it for you. Yours?

    I’m growing very weary of the bottom-up nihilism of posters on these blogs. We get it. You’ve had shitty experiences with women. Good for you. But that’s NOT reality; that is YOUR reality. A rare few commenters will post on these blogs their true experiences with females, (I suspect) in an attempt to freely offer bread crumbs to those seeking said bread crumbs. (At least, that’s why I do it.) So why not just hear what they have to tell you, instead of initiating your omega snark? Are you here to learn and progress, or to reinforce your omega mindset and remain static?

    Here’s a note for the fakers: It’s obvious where you exist along the spectrum based on what you say and how you say it. You cannot hide that. YOU CANNOT HIDE IT. Stop bullshitting… the value will accrue to all of us. Your faux-framing might work on men with less experience than you, but it doesn’t work on men with more experience than you… because we’ve experienced it. The only reason I even post on this site is because I care about the genuine men who contribute to the society that I live in, but who don’t receive the sexual awards concomitant with their contributions to society. I value those guys because they enhance my own quality of life; therefore, I’m willing to share some shit.

    Dipshit, this is not directed at you, personally, but at all the dipshits like you, coming from the same place whence you come. You’re a nobody who could be a somebody, if you could struggle past your warped ego… as is the case with all the many dipshit posters ruining this blog.

    Playing a female’s orgasm as a symphony is one of the greatest joys that I have yet to experience in this life. And no one is hurt, no one is damaged, everyone comes out better for it. Dipshits like you don’t want this to exist, because it holds you to a higher standard, for which you are not yet equipped. You would rather treat them horribly to “get back at them” for their ill-treatment of you. Why the bad vibes? Females are egg housing, nothing more. Why the nihilistic approach to them? Are you a man, or a bitch?

    But, for men who are honestly putting in the work, they deserve the hope of a higher objective; something more than just picking up skanks in US bars/clubs. Now I’m speaking directly to those guys: it’s true, you can have meaningful, even spiritual, relationships with women in the US… though, statistically, you will NOT find them in bars/clubs. True, US women are intensely extremely damaged… no argument from me. Nonetheless, you CAN have spiritually fulfilling relationships with US women. I’m not suggesting you marry them. Given the current state of US divorce law, that is suicidal.

    Despite all the destruction of male/female relationships that has taken place in our society, women are still the wonderful creatures given us by the creator. To enjoy them fully, is to live this life fully. To be a little omega bitch about it is to deny life, which you, dipshit, seem personally attached to. Sad for you.

    LikeLike


    • on March 30, 2013 at 6:59 am thwack

      avd, don’t worry about it. Not only is it not your job to teach these guys, but Im not sure if its even possible. Unless they’ve given a girl a vaginal orgasm, they may have no idea what you are talking about. Some will find out, some won’t.

      Don’t let it bother you.

      LikeLike


  81. on March 30, 2013 at 5:30 pm Mike Erpelding

    Note the squeeze to the knee to the tool to her left. Dominance and submission can always be established physically. An example: I have two Rottweilers. No matter what they do they will immediately submit to me when I touch them. They are not allowed to touch me without my permission. The power to grasp is the power of the Alpha in a relationship. If you see a hottie that you want, move her…never say “excuse me”. And never let her grab or clasp you.

    LikeLike


  82. on March 31, 2013 at 2:34 am homebot

    I disagree. There is a fundamental gender imbalance in the world, with too many men and not enough women.

    It’s part of nature, worsened by gender-specific abortion and the massive floodwave of male third-world immigration encouraged by our Demopublican-corporate overlords.

    The only way forward may be to figure out more tolerable ways for men to share the available attractive women.

    LikeLike


  83. on May 20, 2013 at 4:55 pm 16 Ways I Blue-Pilled My Marriage | Colonel Crimson

    […] him to hold her hand. It wouldn’t have mattered. In fact, it probably would have produced a subconscious pelvis reaction in her revealing her deep-seated disdain for […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    P.K. Griswold on The Race To Self-Disgrace
    Paracelsus on The Race To Self-Disgrace
    Sentient on The Backup Country
    Sentient on The Backup Country
    P.K. Griswold on The Backup Country
    ultimathule1 on The Backup Country
    Lumenwood on Is Gimp Dog The New Birthday…
    Lumenwood on Is Gimp Dog The New Birthday…
    Gunslingergregi on Is Gimp Dog The New Birthday…
    Gunslingergregi on The Race To Self-Disgrace
  • Top Posts

    • Killing A Mountain Lion With Bare Hands Game
    • The Race To Self-Disgrace
    • Is Gimp Dog The New Birthday Cat?
    • The Backup Country
    • Is The Tankgrrl Era Finally Ending?
    • Alpha Of The Month Contest
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • Paris, Then And Now
    • Based&Christpilled Hungarians
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: