• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Putting Game Theory Into Practice: Judge Dread Edition
The Faith »

Black Men Have Much To Discuss About Murderous Crime

March 31, 2013 by CH

Imagine if White American men and boys were committing hundreds of murders month after month, year after year. Articles and interviews would flood the media, and we’d have political debates demanding that White Americans be “held accountable.” Then, if an atrocity such as the Brunswick, GA shooting of an infant took place and White American male leaders held a news conference to offer solutions, their credibility would be questionable. The public would tell these leaders that they need to focus on problems in their own culture and communities.

But when the criminals and leaders are black men, race and gender become the elephant in the room.

A disproportionate number of all of the murders in this country in recent centuries — not just Brunswick, Washington DC, Essex, Milwaukee, Old Bridge and Manchester — have been committed by black men and boys, who are seven times more likely than whites to commit homicide. Yet when the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), led by black men, held a news conference after the Manchester massacre — oh wait, the NAACP had nothing to say about the Manchester massacre.

Unlike white male Americans, black men are not used to being singled out and pilloried. So we expect that many of them will protest it is unfair if we talk about them. But our nation must correctly define their contribution to our problem of gun violence if it is to be solved.

When black men try to divert attention from gun violence by talking about white racism, many people buy into the idea that the United States has a privileged white male patriarchy problem, or flawed social systems with which to address those problems, and they think that is what produces disproportionate black violent crime.

But women and girls living under the white male patriarchy are not picking up handguns and shooting sideways at gang members and infants. Non-black immigrants who voluntarily immigrated to a land of white male oppression are not committing 85% of the black-white interracial crime every year that blacks commit. Latinos who crossed the unprotected border by the tens of millions to live under the thumb of white male oppression are only continually committing violent crime at three times the white rate. Good on them.

Each of us is programmed from childhood to believe that the bottom group of our hierarchies — and in the U.S. culture, that’s black men — represents oppressed peoples, so it can feel awkward, even ridiculous, when we try to call attention to those people as a distinct group and hold them accountable.

For example, our schools teach revised American history as the history of everyone in this nation. But the stories we learn are predominantly about evil slave-holding white men and Emmett Till. To study the history of other white groups who actually built the nation from the ground up, people have to take separate classes, such as unrevised American history, European history or home schooling. And if we take “White American History,” we don’t expect to learn “Asian American History,” because a class about anything but the real history of America is assumed not to be inclusive of the Ming Dynasty.

This societal and cultural programming makes it easy for tribalist, black-male-led groups to convince the nation that an organization led by black men, such as the NAACP or the Congressional Black Caucus, can represent the interests of the entire nation when, in fact, they predominately represent only their own egos and bank accounts.

If life were equitable, black male violent crime exculpation-rights advocates would face some serious questions to assess their degree of credibility and objectivity. We would expect them to explain:

What facets of black male culture create so many homicides?

Why are so many black men and boys producing and entertaining themselves with violent gangsta rap and other media?

Why do black men buy, sell and steal guns for killing; attend gang initiation drives; and demonstrate for unrestricted white male culpability disproportionately more than people of other ethnicities or races?

Why are black male congressmen leading the fight against black violence control?

If Americans ask the right questions on violent crime issues, we will get the right answers. These answers will encourage black men to examine their role in their own culture and to help other black men and boys become healthier and less violent.

This article reprinted with permission from its original publication in the Washington Post.

keywords:

white intraracial status whoring, white liberal self-annihilation, diversivibraunistrength, cat ladies, closet lesbians, old spinsters who hate white men because they were once sexually rejected by a white man, , 

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Current Events, Ugly Truths | 476 Comments

476 Responses

  1. on March 31, 2013 at 8:14 am ttaz4dqm

    It is difficult to get anyone: Black, White, rich, poor, etc, to have a reality-based (supported by stats, facts and figures) discussion regarding race-reality in this country (‘Murr’ka). PC-ism has made that very difficult. One of my favorite ironies is hearing Blacks and Liberals say “OK, yes, there is more violent crime committed by Blacks, but most of that is black-on-black crime”, as if that matters? What a self-hating thing for a Black person to say! Just a thought.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:12 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozozoz

      hey heartsistesz!!! hearrseieteiszz!!!! happy easter bunny day! lzoozozozo

      i posted da GBFM chrurch ersmoenz sermonz at dalrockkas toady:

      i could not find my ritalin presicrtripon ritalinz, until now just now, so most of my sermeoen lacked da trademark GBFM lzzllzozozozozzzoozzlozoozz omzzgz zlzlozozoz

      On this pretty Easter Sunday, I would like to point out that the Marxist Communist Bolsheviks destroyed religion in the Soviet Union by abolishing and banning it.

      Because the Soviet Union failed and exiled all the Bolsheviks after millions were murdered in the name of communism, the Bolsheviks could not do the same thing again in their new countries. And so they invented feminism, neoconservatism, and postmodernism and used them as battering rams against the souls of the churches and universities. This way, they could abolish religion while not only leaving the church and university buildings standing, but they could actually use the churches to abolish and destroy the Spirit of Christianity, and teach its very opposite from the pulpits like Driscoll at al.

      Jesus predicted all of this, as such is the way of the world in Matthew 23, just before the Scribes and Pharisees made sure he would be crucified–imagine speaking the following words to your feminist minister and the fate you would suffer–then you would better understand the Spirit of Easter:

      13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

      14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

      15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

      16 Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!

      17 Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?

      18 And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty.

      19 Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift?

      20 Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon.

      21 And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein.

      22 And he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon.

      23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

      24 Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

      25 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.

      26 Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.

      27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.

      28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

      29 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,

      30 And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.

      31 Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.

      32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.

      33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

      34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:

      35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.

      36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.

      37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

      38 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

      39 For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

      Well, the true meaning of Easter is the Resurrection of the True Ideals of Christianity.

      And that belongs not to the institution–not to the church–but to the Man.

      For Christ himself had no fancy building nor exalted altar, but only his words and honor.

      Christ stated that he was not king of this world, but rather the King of the world of Ideals.

      And that Kingdom has ever been the domain of Man. Man’s greatest asset, which he so often forgets these days, is not the knowledge of game to gain him asses lzzlozoz, but knowledge of the Great Books for Men–the unified symphony that begins with Homer and Moses and progresses to Socrates and Jesus–exalted by Dante et. al on down the line.

      And Christ invites you to celebrate Easter as your Fathers did, not to man up and marry the sluts as your pastor prescribes, but to Man Up and read the King James Bible for yourself.

      Then, like Thomas Jefferson, you might conclude:

      “Jefferson accomplished a more limited goal in 1804 with “The Philosophy of Jesus of Nazareth”, the predecessor to The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth.[6] He described it in a letter to John Adams dated October 13, 1813:
      In extracting the pure principles which he taught, we should have to strip off the artificial vestments in which they have been muffled by priests, who have travestied them into various forms, as instruments of riches and power to themselves. We must dismiss the Platonists and Plotinists, the Stagyrites and Gamalielites, the Eclectics, the Gnostics and Scholastics, their essences and emanations, their logos and demiurges, aeons and daemons, male and female, with a long train of … or, shall I say at once, of nonsense. We must reduce our volume to the simple evangelists, select, even from them, the very words only of Jesus, paring off the amphibologisms into which they have been led, by forgetting often, or not understanding, what had fallen from him, by giving their own misconceptions as his dicta, and expressing unintelligibly for others what they had not understood themselves. There will be found remaining the most sublime and benevolent code of morals which has ever been offered to man. I have performed this operation for my own use, by cutting verse by verse out of the printed book, and arranging the matter which is evidently his, and which is as easily distinguishable as diamonds in a dunghill. The result is an octavo of forty-six pages, of pure and unsophisticated doctrines”

      Renaissance comes from re-naissance meaning rebirth.

      And the greater salvation for all the men coming of age is not to be found in gaming deosuled, berankified, debt-laden womenz, but it is to be found in honoring the classic, epic ideals.

      The classic, epic, exalted ideals will not make a woman’s butt nor gina tingelzozlzozo, and thus, at the end of the day, following the classic, epic exalted ideals is not only the highest form of of life, but it is the highest form of fallen game too, for it simply does not answer, respond to, nor is dictated by butt and gina tinglelzozlzzlzozlzzlzozl. And there is no greater game than that–not even wearing furry hats, negging, and wasting your invaluable time on this earth in playing texty-texty games with those incapable of exalted ideals, just to serve your baser, biological callings which so often voluntarily imprison one to the state and its small-souled dictators.

      As Jesus died for you, so too was He reborn for you. Do not call is “teahcings” noise as so many churchians do. Do not falsely suppose that he came to abolish the law of Moses, but understand that he came to Fulfill it. Understand that Jesus saw noble pagans as his brothers and false preachers as his enemy, when he stated “there are those who are saying they do not go, who go; and there are those who say they are not going, who end up going.” For Jesus, unlike the false preachers, judges us not by the sect of our faith alone, nor the color of our church, but by our *actions*.

      So Man Up, pick up a couple translations of the Bible, of Homer, and Virgil, and read all Your Fathers and Brothers today, and exalt in a Renaissance of the Great Books for Men.

      dis has been a GBFM sunday sermon which i delivered herein as if i had stated thusly in a church i would have been flogged to death by the minister and his harem of buteteocockeked bernieifkfied womenz (and som of their bastard kidz too who are now getting old enough to listen to their slutty momz about how the reaosn the y have no fatherz is becaseu menz are bad bard bad bad zllzlzlzolzolozzlozozlzzzlzll)

      god bless & thanks to pastor dalrock for his invaluable work, for if anything, dalrock’s logic, reason, wit, wisdom, bold service in the living context, and humble temperament are expressions of our Father’s Spirit.

      zlzolzolzz

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:13 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozlzolzlzoz

      On this pretty Easter Sunday, I would like to point out that the Marxist Communist Bolsheviks destroyed religion in the Soviet Union by abolishing and banning it.

      Because the Soviet Union failed and exiled all the Bolsheviks after millions were murdered in the name of communism, the Bolsheviks could not do the same thing again in their new countries. And so they invented feminism, neoconservatism, and postmodernism and used them as battering rams against the souls of the churches and universities. This way, they could abolish religion while not only leaving the church and university buildings standing, but they could actually use the churches to abolish and destroy the Spirit of Christianity, and teach its very opposite from the pulpits like Driscoll at al.

      Jesus predicted all of this, as such is the way of the world in Matthew 23, just before the Scribes and Pharisees made sure he would be crucified–imagine speaking the following words to your feminist minister and the fate you would suffer–then you would better understand the Spirit of Easter:

      13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

      14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows’ houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

      15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

      16 Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!

      17 Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?

      18 And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty.

      19 Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift?

      20 Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon.

      21 And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein.

      22 And he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon.

      23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

      24 Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.

      25 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.

      26 Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.

      27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.

      28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.

      29 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,

      30 And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.

      31 Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.

      32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.

      33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

      34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:

      35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.

      36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.

      37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

      38 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

      39 For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

      Well, the true meaning of Easter is the Resurrection of the True Ideals of Christianity.

      And that belongs not to the institution–not to the church–but to the Man.

      For Christ himself had no fancy building nor exalted altar, but only his words and honor.

      Christ stated that he was not king of this world, but rather the King of the world of Ideals.

      And that Kingdom has ever been the domain of Man. Man’s greatest asset, which he so often forgets these days, is not the knowledge of game to gain him asses lzzlozoz, but knowledge of the Great Books for Men–the unified symphony that begins with Homer and Moses and progresses to Socrates and Jesus–exalted by Dante et. al on down the line.

      And Christ invites you to celebrate Easter as your Fathers did, not to man up and marry the sluts as your pastor prescribes, but to Man Up and read the King James Bible for yourself.

      Then, like Thomas Jefferson, you might conclude:

      “Jefferson accomplished a more limited goal in 1804 with “The Philosophy of Jesus of Nazareth”, the predecessor to The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth.[6] He described it in a letter to John Adams dated October 13, 1813:
      In extracting the pure principles which he taught, we should have to strip off the artificial vestments in which they have been muffled by priests, who have travestied them into various forms, as instruments of riches and power to themselves. We must dismiss the Platonists and Plotinists, the Stagyrites and Gamalielites, the Eclectics, the Gnostics and Scholastics, their essences and emanations, their logos and demiurges, aeons and daemons, male and female, with a long train of … or, shall I say at once, of nonsense. We must reduce our volume to the simple evangelists, select, even from them, the very words only of Jesus, paring off the amphibologisms into which they have been led, by forgetting often, or not understanding, what had fallen from him, by giving their own misconceptions as his dicta, and expressing unintelligibly for others what they had not understood themselves. There will be found remaining the most sublime and benevolent code of morals which has ever been offered to man. I have performed this operation for my own use, by cutting verse by verse out of the printed book, and arranging the matter which is evidently his, and which is as easily distinguishable as diamonds in a dunghill. The result is an octavo of forty-six pages, of pure and unsophisticated doctrines”

      Renaissance comes from re-naissance meaning rebirth.

      And the greater salvation for all the men coming of age is not to be found in gaming deosuled, berankified, debt-laden womenz, but it is to be found in honoring the classic, epic ideals.

      The classic, epic, exalted ideals will not make a woman’s butt nor gina tingelzozlzozo, and thus, at the end of the day, following the classic, epic exalted ideals is not only the highest form of of life, but it is the highest form of fallen game too, for it simply does not answer, respond to, nor is dictated by butt and gina tinglelzozlzzlzozlzzlzozl. And there is no greater game than that–not even wearing furry hats, negging, and wasting your invaluable time on this earth in playing texty-texty games with those incapable of exalted ideals, just to serve your baser, biological callings which so often voluntarily imprison one to the state and its small-souled dictators.

      As Jesus died for you, so too was He reborn for you. Do not call is “teahcings” noise as so many churchians do. Do not falsely suppose that he came to abolish the law of Moses, but understand that he came to Fulfill it. Understand that Jesus saw noble pagans as his brothers and false preachers as his enemy, when he stated “there are those who are saying they do not go, who go; and there are those who say they are not going, who end up going.” For Jesus, unlike the false preachers, judges us not by the sect of our faith alone, nor the color of our church, but by our *actions*.

      So Man Up, pick up a couple translations of the Bible, of Homer, and Virgil, and read all Your Fathers and Brothers today, and exalt in a Renaissance of the Great Books for Men.

      dis has been a GBFM sunday sermon which i delivered herein as if i had stated thusly in a church i would have been flogged to death by the minister and his harem of buteteocockeked bernieifkfied womenz (and som of their bastard kidz too who are now getting old enough to listen to their slutty momz about how the reaosn the y have no fatherz is becaseu menz are bad bard bad bad zllzlzlzolzolozzlozozlzzzlzll)

      god bless & thanks to pastor dalrock for his invaluable work, for if anything, dalrock’s logic, reason, wit, wisdom, bold service in the living context, and humble temperament are expressions of our Father’s Spirit.

      zlzolzolzz

      zlozozozozoz

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:36 pm MichaelC

        GBFM, I thank you for this, my brother.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 2:14 pm ¡George!

        well of course! you are one less idiot on this world in saying that Yeshwa never contradicted the teachings of our great teacher, Moses but is meant to fulfill them and to further teach to the people the essence of the Old Testament, not bend it unlike what most idiotic preachers will tell you.
        Good one on that holy GBFM!!

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:31 am equilibrium

      It’s basically writing off black victims of crime – “oh, well, it would matter if the victims were White, but because it’s only chaos within the black community, it doesn’t really matter … no one important will get pissed off”.

      Which is, of course, a viciously racist thing to say, but because liberals and blacks say it, they get a free pass.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 7:54 pm ttaz4dqm

        Precisely!

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:38 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      one can better understand female hypergammy if you understand female mathematics.

      if a 3 is banged by 6 bored alphas during college, she will add 3+6=9 and consider herself a 9.

      she will do more female math and reason that she can wait until 45 to have children, so she will wait for one of those college alphas to find her on facebook, travel to her apartment in the city, get down on one knee, and propose. as all the other 9.8 alphas she banged over the past 25 years from 20 to 45 just weren’t good enough for her, as they could not commit, unlike the college alpha, who would have, had she just been ready.

      “how can she bang 9.8 alphas?” you ask the GBFM. “is that some sort of way that she counted buttehxt?”

      no. the 9.8 comes form the fact that when you ask a woman over thirty how many men she has been with, she naturally divides the true number by 10, as such is the nature of female math. she had been with 9.8 x 10 =98 men, as 9.8 = 98/10. were she to also add the buttcoking sessions, she would have said she had been with 14.7 men, which is in reality 147.

      ok, now da GBFM has delivered both a churrche semronz and a lecture on MATHMETIACSZ and i haven’t even gone easter egg huntingz yet zlozozlzozlzozozo

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 11:37 am ‘Reality’ Doug

        @GBFM Piggybacking at the front of the line again. Is that the unwritten 49th Law of Power? lol Your comments are interesting.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 11:43 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozo

        have you read

        48 Laws of Butthextual Power?

        why do you suppose
        teh author enver references
        jesus?

        is it because jesus
        in his mind
        has now power?

        2,000 years form now,
        will be celeebrate 50 cent and the 48 laws of power
        or jesus?
        zlzozlzloozlzlzo

        will easter beocme the day
        when robert green and 50 cent are resurrected each year
        of jesus’s code of honor?

        lzozlzlzolz

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 12:05 pm moe jones

        A most excellent post for a change, GBFM.

        LikeLike


  2. on March 31, 2013 at 8:18 am apollyon911

    This whole post is racist…factually correct, but still…

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 8:28 am ttaz4dqm

      Are you trolling? Because if it IS factually correct, then how on earth can you call it racist?

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:10 am Mr. Rational

        Facts are racist.  Logic is racist.  The evidence of your eyes is racist.

        Anything that makes a member of a protected minority look bad, feel bad, or not attain the same economic and social status as a white person is racist.  From this, it follows that nature is racist.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:26 am ttaz4dqm

        My point was that to the empirically-minded, especially in the context of CH’s essay, facts cannot be racist in the sense that racism is fueled by emotion, perception, and anecdotal evidence as opposed to hard facts. You do make an interesting point, however. I will think on it.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:39 am Mr. Rational

        Before you spend much time on it, take your sarcasm detector in for a tune-up.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:49 am ttaz4dqm

        Ah, very subtle! See, now that happens to ME all the time… but it seldom happens the other way around…that makes two interesting posts here today. Among others.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 11:14 am frozenpie77

      Facts are racist?

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 11:26 am Anonymous

        Honesty and integrity are, just ask Democrats.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 6:21 pm PetiteOlive

        It is quite perplexing isn’t it? I am a-political for the most part, but I always love how how my far left friends brand me as a “racist” or “right winged” when I try to present statistical facts. Either that or they try to come up with some BS explanation behind the stats (read: oppression).

        Speaking of race, my Indian neighbours have a bunch of dinner guests over, and the food smells are permeating my apartment, smells good…kinda wish they would bring me over some 😦

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 6:29 pm gunslingergregi

        just go over and take the food like I did
        course I was offered it he he he
        just had to pay in hugs

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 6:41 pm Wrecked 'Em

        The statement “Blacks have darker skin” is, in fact, racist.

        Any statement that talks about race in a general way is “racist”. It may also be, and frequently is, true.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:26 pm Canadian Friend

        facts are racist?

        or is it that racists are factual?

        hehe

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:08 pm whorefinder

        +1

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:08 pm whorefinder

        Yes, dude. Facts ARE racist. Racism is nothing more than noticing that there are patterns among human appearance and behavior that are associated with racial groups.

        You’ll note something there: simply because something is racist does not mean it’s 1) untrue; or 2) a bad thing to say.

        However, PC-dogma has taught us that “RACIST!”= bad AND untrue.

        It’s a female way of thinking. De-program yourself from the dogma. Wear claims of racism, sexism, and sexualism with pride. Agree and Amplify.

        LikeLike


  3. on March 31, 2013 at 8:43 am s

    Heartiste, I LOVE your work, and you’re generally spot on. BUT. The answer is pretty obvious here. The issue, or rather the cause here isn’t so much race race. The primary cause and reason coincides very nicely with the black fatherlessm single mother rates here in the states.

    Kids that come from single mother families are more likely to commit violent crimes, exhibit antisocial behavior, etc.

    Fixing the issue is only difficult because it would force us to look at the REAL scapegoats: weaponized feminism (for all of the “good” it claims to do), and state dependence.

    Fixing the issue won’t come for along time because society is too chickenshit to tell women stop having kids out of wedlock (although yes, I do understand that marriage is mostly bullshit), stop fucking/getting knocked up by scumbags, and to be so audacious as to be held accountable for their own actions.

    There was this one black kid off of this documentary about what black men think, which summed everything up nicely “… it’s the mother who make the gangsters”.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:10 pm whorefinder

      The issue, or rather the cause here isn’t so much race race. The primary cause and reason coincides very nicely with the black fatherlessm single mother rates here in the states.
      —Unfortunately, you’re wrong.

      1. Black fatherlessness far outpaces non-black fatherlessness, even controlling for race.

      2. Even controlling for poverty and fatherlessness, blacks still engage in more crime and anti-social behavior than non-blacks.

      It’s quite simple: blacks are uncivilized beasts.

      LikeLike


  4. on March 31, 2013 at 8:44 am Bob Wallace

    Emmit Till. Hmm. Till’s father was hanged in Italy during WWII for raping and murdering two Italian women and murdering a third. His son, who knew nothing about how his father died, sexually assaulted a white woman (not “whistle at her”) who ran to her car to get a pistol. Her relatives took Till for a drive to scare him, Till ran his mouth, things got out of hand and they shot Till. Murder, yes, but it points out the old cliche about how the apple doesn’t fall from the tree. Like father, like son.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 11:01 am anonymous

      Bob Wallace I have never heard the Emmitt Till story told like that before, can you list some actual proof of that’s what happened? Or is it inconceivable to you that a young black male in the 1950’s would get murdered for whistling at a white woman in Mississippi of all places? According to the white woman he grabbed her at the waist and asked her for a date (is that sexual assault?). Oh took him for a drive, you mean kidnapped him in the middle of the night, beat him, shot him and dumped his body in the river. You forgot that part

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:10 pm Big Bill

        You probably got that right. He copped a feel and wound up dead. What happened with Matthew Shepard as well. Some folks’ women you just dont fsck with. Understand, white boy? Cop a feel in the ghetto and you wind up dead, too. Cop a feel of an Afghan woman, Kuwaiti woman, same thing, white boy. If it makes you feel better, call it “multicultural insensitivity” … on the part of Emmett Till, that is.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:11 pm whorefinder

        She claimed he grabbed her waist and said “unprintable” things to her.

        So he basically asked her to fuck and grabbed her crotch.

        Keep in mind this is not some club whore. This was a married woman working at a store in daylight.

        The little nig ger was an uncivilized piece of trash. Good riddance.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 1:03 pm nydwracu

      Carolyn Bryant later asserted that Till had grabbed her at the waist and asked her for a date. She said the young man also used “unprintable” words.[26]

      In any event, Carolyn Bryant was so alarmed she ran outside to a car to retrieve a pistol from under the seat.

      I wonder what the feminist position is on Emmett Till…?

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 4:19 pm yeahokcool

      I did not know about this little factoid until you posted. I spent some time researching what you suggested and it that you’re quite right. Interesting. Many years ago I read Lewis Jordan’s novel, Wolf Whistle. I thought it was reasonable good (in terms of its literary value), but it certainly whitewashed the “true” history. Even still, I’d recommend the novel as a good example of southern magical realism.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:25 pm anononono

        interesting. It’s like women are all rapeity rape rape until they hear it’s a black guy, then it doesn’t exist. I bet most swpls are like Till was alleged to have assaulted a woman because he was black and therefore the assault doesn’t exist. So, a rape awareness white gurl would never even absorb the assault that is part of the Till legend. Cause they’re there to bring down white men.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 1:01 am lorem ipsum

        I’m from the area where the incident occurred, my family was involved in an indirect fashion with the trial. Bob’s post is correct. Much of the story that doesn’t fit the narrative has been shoved down the memory hole.

        LikeLike


  5. on March 31, 2013 at 8:44 am Holden Caulfield

    Whenever a leftoid encounters an uncomfortable truth, they try to slap a distracting label on it in the hopes that others may not recognize the truth.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:15 am Exeter

      And it works every time.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:12 pm whorefinder

        Not like it used to, thank goodness.

        LikeLike


  6. on March 31, 2013 at 8:46 am Retrophoebia

    Time for some La Griffe and Math!

    Not only do we find the sentence of death in Alabama to be biased against white suspects, it is extraordinarily so.

    As a neighborhood becomes overwhelmingly black, the risk curve for whites rises to ominous heights. In the last stages of transformation, the likelihood of a white being victimized within a year becomes a virtual certainty.

    LikeLike


  7. on March 31, 2013 at 8:51 am xasthur

    It’s not in their culture, it’s in their blood. You can’t make a pet out of a wild animal.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:14 pm whorefinder

      +10

      Interesting zoological fact:

      Zebras and horses can mate and have offspring. However, despite this, zebras cannot be “tamed” to be ridden as horses can. This is a fact: no one has ever discovered a method to domesticate zebras so that they can be ridden like horses.

      In other words, just because two different animals can mate DOES NOT mean they are of the same species, or that both can be civilized.

      LikeLike


  8. on March 31, 2013 at 8:53 am 357

    “These answers will encourage black men to examine their role in their own culture and to help other black men and boys become healthier and less violent.”

    Not without a large proportion of White genetic material. By-ad-large, blacks lack the facility for honest self-reflection.

    Now, it’s not the certainty of punishment that deters blacks from violent crime. It is the severity of punishment that deters these creatures.

    If, for example, a violent black was taken to the town square, tied to post by his black thumbs, and whipped until his ribs were exposed, black crime would crash harder than the stock market in ’08.

    That’s it — problem solved.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:24 pm Nicole

      And of course the people whipping him are not violent, right?

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:27 pm whorefinder

        Society condones a level of violence in its caretakers—if carefully checked. You seem to think “society” means hugging and kissing like a commune. Not so, especially with you feral beasts around.

        Armies are allowed to shoot, police officers are allowed to shoot you armed thugs, murderers should be executed, and blacks should be whipped.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:08 am Nicole

        Okay, go whip some Black people then, and see how far you get with that.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:13 am whorefinder

        lol. Be careful what you wish for, darky; you just might get it.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 5:24 pm Nicole

        Go on then. Whip me. I dare you.

        In fact, there’s 100 bucks in it if you survive getting closer than 3 meters.

        LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2013 at 12:06 pm eyeslevel

      I just want my own country with no blacks around. No blacks, no black on white crime, no whippings necessary, no racial oppression possible. Problem solved.

      LikeLike


  9. on March 31, 2013 at 8:57 am thwack

    Hmmm… slow game day at the Chateau?

    (((shakin my head)))

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 11:59 am Full-Fledged Fiasco

      Stick to poon!

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:30 pm Ben - Aus

        “SHTICK TO POON WHITEY!! DUN WANNA READABOUT BLACKIESS KILLIN PPLZ L”

        “WHADDUP YOS?!?!?”

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 1:19 pm whorefinder

      Poor jungle bunny. Still in denial, still trying to lie his way out of it.

      But you black devils will be paying for you crimes soon enough.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 1:47 pm Nicole

        Africans are used to paying for their crimes and then some. There are more African Americans incarcerated now than were slaves in 1850. Your problem is that now, European Americans are being required to pay for their crimes as well because your services as useful idiots are no longer needed.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 2:12 pm whorefinder

        Africans are used to paying for their crimes and then some.
        –Not these days, baby.

        There are more African Americans incarcerated now than were slaves in 1850.
        —lol. Dumb aunti J—-typical female and darky—can’t understand math.

        European Americans are being required to pay for their crimes
        —“Take up the white man’s burden.”
        Kipling was more right than we ever knew.

        because your services as useful idiots are no longer needed
        —lmao. Yes, creating a civilization that keeps worthless beasts like you alive was a stupid idea. Next time, we won’t be so stupid.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 7:47 pm Nicole

        You will be that stupid next time because you are that stupid every time.

        While we’re on race realism, let’s get into Anglo Saxon blindness.

        You take over a place, subdue it, then expect the people to like you. You import slaves and expect them to like you.

        No other people on the face of the Earth fucks people up and then expects to be liked for it.

        The multikult is just another attempt to get people to like you, as is this insistence on being viewed as superior. That is just another flavor titled, “You should like us because we’re better than you. We really are. Really.”

        You’re like that because you like the people who screw you. You liked the priests. You like more government. You want the government to tell people who they can and can’t shag because you just love it when some institution is telling you what to do in every facet of your lives.

        You think this makes you better…more “civilized”. The whole world doesn’t want to be civilized that way.

        Russians go in and mess some people up, and fully understand that they are not going to be liked for it.

        Why can’t you people be more like Russians?

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:19 pm whiskeysplace

        Who is this we? The only reason you’re not a slave, is my direct male ancestor (among others) fought to free yours. Only a few Whites enslaved Blacks. Who by the way, tend even today to EAT each other. [Six years ago ECOWAS begged their citizens to please not eat the Pygmies and Albinos.]

        Nor do I or most Whites desire want or need to be liked. I frankly don’t give a damn if Blacks or Asians or Hispanics love me or hate me, or my race. Why should I?

        What I obect to is Black criminality, violence, and brutality. As far as government goes, only New Englanders/Scandinavians like that. Italians, Irish, French, Spanish, Polish, etc. don’t like government.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:35 pm Nicole

        Whiskey, I object to humans being stupid and harming me or people I care for, including those in whatever nation I’m calling home at the time. I don’t care what color my enemy is. It does not make me feel better if the person exploiting or harming me or mine is the same color as me.

        …but I understand that makes defines me as psychotic and antisocial somehow. I don’t see how someone feels better getting screwed by people just because they look similar.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:56 am 357

        Whiskey said:

        “The only reason you’re not a slave, is my direct male ancestor (among others) fought to free yours.”

        Not necessarily.

        Lets say the Northern war of aggression never happened: The industrial revolution would have rendered blacks useless, they would have been viewed as nothing more than antiquated farm equipment; as such, they would’ve been granted manumission and shipped back to the dark continent.

        How much better would the quality of life be in America (the world?) if history unfolded in such a manner? No 24/7 Negro hero worship, no Barrack Hussein Obama and his ho in the White House, no insane gossip about an African pontiff, no perverted myth of Lincoln as the ‘great emancipator’, no epidemic of black on white rape … ugh. The list can go on ad infinitum.

        Instead, we have what we have today, what will be viewed by historians as: the golden era of blackness, where a group of people had been promoted so far beyond their natural station in life, at the expense and to the mockery of the host population that made it all possible in the first place.

        We live in bizarre times indeed.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:21 pm Syd Barrett

        Hey Nicole, you understand that Russians are white Slavic people dont you ?? Here’s why western white culture is currently undermining itself with the absurd notion of equality among cultures. Enjoy:

        And while we’re at it, here is a little history for you , presented by a black professor, about the real power behind slavery in North America and surrounding parts. You seem fairly intelligent, so the notion of ” divide and conquer” should jump out at you very easily.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 5:29 pm Nicole

        I’m aware of what Russians look like. I’m also aware that some Jews owned slaves and made a lot of money off of it. Some still do from various companies in Africa that have de facto slave labor.

        They just tend not to get into arguments with me about whether or not the world should view them as superior because they don’t really give a fuck.

        I think they have the right attitude. It’s butt hurt Americans who don’t know where their Ancestors are from, and/or who sold out for an imaginary “race” who get their knickers in a twist because I don’t kiss their ass.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:38 pm Robert

        > There are more African Americans incarcerated now than were slaves in 1850.

        Bragging will get you nowhere.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:58 pm Nicole

        Crying about how the world owes you pussy and money for nicely presenting your buttocks to the feminists for pegging will get you nowhere.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:31 pm Ben - Aus

        Please do not feed this bloated gorilla troll.

        “Oooga booga me wanta sum whyte shuga!”

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 6:11 pm corvinus

        Somehow, you have us confused with Hugs Schwyzer. (shakes head)

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 7:16 pm Nicole

        Corvinus, if you think the world owes you anything because of your color, you are just as stupid as the leftists. Equalism is equalism is equalism. It wants what it neither earned nor has the will to maintain.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:03 pm driveallnight

        Shhh, it’s whitey’s fault! They’re only depraved because they’re deprived.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:11 pm Nicole

        Nobody African here is saying that. We’re just saying that your depravity is definitely not because of our depravity.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:13 pm Nicole

        Then again, if we’re of the same stock as your ancestors, maybe it is.

        So yeah, it’s our genes, so it’s our fault so many Russians are on krokodil and so many generic White American women love to suck the Black cock. They’re just trying to get back to their roots.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 8:00 pm Canadian Friend

        “… > There are more African Americans incarcerated now than were slaves in 1850….”

        The 1850 USA census; total population 23 Million

        Today’s population ; over 314 Million

        There is also more people in the USA who eat tomatoe soup in 2013 than there was in 1850 or more left handed people or more people who snore or more people who sleep on the left side of the bed.

        It is not injustice, it is population increase and simple maths.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:10 pm Nicole

        Did I say that it was injustice, or that it was evidence that plenty of Black folks are paying for their crimes?

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 6:35 pm Tyrone

      I have a whole collection of Uncle Wiggly stories. The written stories are all about being clever and outsmarting your opponents. I really don’t consider them racist. Do you? If so, why?

      LikeLike


  10. on March 31, 2013 at 8:57 am Exeter

    In a sense, violent gang-associated black men are the most red pill of all. Just last week Heartiste posted his “fundamental premise” about the expendable nature of men. Black men know they are expendable and they know that if they want something they have to take it.

    Your average swaggering nigger is the embodiment of Chateau maxims: he is the ultimate untamed savage alpha. Destructive to society, of course, but then so are guys like YaReally and Tyler Durden who just roam the globe and shark bitches, not really contributing anything to societal progress. They are basically white niggers. Talk about uncomfortable truths.

    I’m not passing judgement mind you, just observing the ugliness of reality. Betas build societies but they don’t get any play, alphas destroy and get all the action along the way.

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 8:29 am Robert

      Betas don’t build sh*t unless they’re getting some. Which was the whole point of patriarchy – imposing limits on women to settle for betas, who will then buy into society. By creating the Great Society, LBJ killed any chance of a stable black community, and by promoting feminism, the Left is doing the same to the rest of us. I would disagree with average anything being alphas. It is likely that 10-20% of a male population will have and maintain sufficient alpha traits to reproduce. Let’s not confuse intergroup rivalry with in-group mate selection.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:13 am Nicole

        Well, now you guys know what you have to do: accept human nature, and rebuild the society to be more naturally appealing to builders and warriors to sustain instead of a cesspool free-for-all for exploiters.

        Good luck with that. Sincerely.

        LikeLike


  11. on March 31, 2013 at 8:57 am HerpDerp

    Can someone please post this link to the WaPo article so that it can be like spammed to ‘top comment’?

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 5:32 pm Ben - Aus

      See link at the end.

      LikeLike


  12. on March 31, 2013 at 9:03 am Kate

    Speaking of revised history, I once had an interesting conversation with a Japanese foreign exchange student I was tutoring. Somehow we got talking about what was in her history books back home regarding Pearl Harbor and the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Apparently the section of Pearl Harbor was very short (as opposed to the attention it is paid in American high school history text books) while the atomic bombs were paid much more attention and focused on a supposed mistranslation of a telegram from Japan to the U.S. before the bombs. The idea that the Japanese had wanted to surrender before the bombings was certainly nothing I had ever heard before. Who can ever know the truth of these things?

    We also discussed how Japanese young people felt about America. She described that her generation had no ill will towrads us. She said her grandparents hated Americans. I told her how in one of the few letters I have from my grandfather, he wrote the words: Remember Pearl Harbor. He was very involved in the boat-building effort for the D-Day invasion (he even made it into the WWII museum in New Orleans as a boat designer) and although he ended up living in Oahu in his retirement and I got to visit him there once, he would not set foot at Pearl Harbor and forbid us from going to the memorial there.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 9:34 am corvinus

      The idea that the Japanese had wanted to surrender before the bombings was certainly nothing I had ever heard before.

      Yeah, I’ve heard that too. The nukings were unjustified — especially Nagasaki — but I guess the gov’t wanted to try out their new bombs to show how badass they were.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:45 am Bob Wallace

        Japan had been trying to surrender for six months but did not want unconditional surrender. They wanted to keep the Emperor on the throne, knowing the Japanese would obey him. After six months of unnecessary slaughter – tens of thousands of Americans and Japanese – the Japanese unconditionally surrendered – and we let them keep the Emperor on the throne anyway.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 1:22 pm whorefinder

        Right. American history books belittle American belligerence/action that encouraged a first strike by Japan—although it was not enough to justify such an attack. Meanwhile, Japanese history books seek to belittle Japanese belligerence/action which encouraged two nuclear bomb drops by Americans.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:50 am Mr. Rational

        Unjustified?  Okinawa was taken by infantry, at a grievous cost in both Allied and Japanese blood (much of the latter civilian).  There were so many casualties expected from the planned assault on Honshu that we are STILL using the Purple Hearts made in anticipation.  The nukes saved lives overall.

        Japan was told to surrender after Hiroshima.  Japan dithered.  Nagasaki proved that Hiroshima was not a fluke.  That finally got the cabinet, still deeply divided, to put the question to Hirohito.  Hirohito sided with Foreign Minister Togo, and that was how the war finally ended.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:54 am Bob Wallace

        You might want to read the comment I left above you before you again make a fool of yourself.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:56 am Canadian Friend

        So according to many of you, no matter what the topic is, be it high rates of crimes in the USA or the involvement of Japan in World War Two, it is never black or yellow people’s fault that things go bad, it is always whitey’s fault.

        Because Japan never signed a pact with Hitler of course, I must be imagining things.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:20 pm whorefinder

        +10 for seeing the truth:

        To the left wing mind: non-whites have no agency, unless they all team up to “fight” the man.

        Whitey, in turn, has ALL the agency, and everyone else is just an “innocent victim.” This is why they must “all unite to fight whitey” or else be perpetual victims.

        The reason why many people here have rejected SWPLism and other blue ills is because it makes no sense. If you were writing a novel or movie based on these premises—only whitey has agency, non-whitey has none, and whitey is evil unless he has a “Road to Damascus” moment—it would seem trite and childish, with cartoonish villains and heroes…

        Wait, that’s basically EVERY anti-racist, anti-male SWPL movie and novel of the 20th century.

        P.s. happy easter

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 1:51 am Mercy

        hey man srs question do we love hitler or hate hitler?

        bonus: was he white?

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 1:23 pm whorefinder

        Drink some kool aid, meng.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 2:23 pm Taco

        Bob a few things:

        1) Mr Rational posted 5 minutes after your initial post, and NOT in response to that post. Its quite possible that he didn’t even see your response before he posted his response.

        2) Your explanation and Mr. Rational’s explanation are not mutually exclusive. But you do make a mistake when you assume that keeping the Emperor on the throne was THE ONLY condition which precluded a cessation of hostilities. Yes, the Japanese wanted to keep their imperial traditions intact, and we ultimately allowed them to do so. But that was far from the only condition which prevented Japan from agreeing to peace in the summer of 1945. A short list of other conditions which Japan would’ve insisted on which were unacceptable to the United States:

        a) Japan gets to keep possession of Korea, Taiwan, and most of their conquered territory in China.
        b) Japan gets to keep their military intact — no restriction on short or long term rebuilding of the army, navy, or air forces.
        c) all allegations of war crimes against the japanese military to be investigated and prosecuted (if necessary) by the japanese themselves, rather than the Allies
        d) No allowance for a democratic system of government to be imposed on japan by the allies
        e) and, as you mentioned, the Emperor gets to keep his throne

        Before we dropped the atom bombs, the Japanese military was prepared to fight to the death before they would compromise on any of those points. They figured, as evidenced at Okinawa, that a full scale invasion of the Japanese main islands would take so long, and cause so many casualties to the US armed forces that Congress would accept peace on Japan’s above listed conditions long before Japan was fully conquered. When the US began using the atom bombs, it became apparent that we could achieve our desired ends without the necessity of putting troops into harms way in Japan, and there was no reason to continue the war.

        Even after the first bomb, the cabinet was not prepared to surrender. After nagasaki, the cabinet (after being forced to do so by Hirohito, who broke all tradition by actually speaking at a cabinet meeting) agreed to surrender, but rogue elements in the military were STILL unwilling, and attempted to kidnap Hirohito in order to overthrow the government and continue the war. This attempt was thwarted, and the surrender took place.

        After all of that, in the end, we allowed the imperial tradition, heavily modified, to continue.

        Bob, posting what you posted, either ignoring or possessing willful ignorance of all of the above, demonstrates quite clearly that one who has made a fool of himself is you.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 7:50 pm Anonymous

        this reply is reasoned and factual — a WWII buff.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 9:40 am thwack

      Kate
      The idea that the Japanese had wanted to surrender before the bombings was certainly nothing I had ever heard before.
      ————————————————————–
      Kate, you need to hang out more with the heretics; skip to the 9 minute mark to see what you been missing.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 1:25 pm whorefinder

        Its an old trope amongst leftists that all actions by the u.s. military after WW2, and half of them in WW2, was based on the idea of the U.S. as a wild-eyed aggressor and everyone else as a doe-eyed innocent victim.

        Thwack is merely parrotting his leftist master’s lines. Note how he doesn’t directly engage any of Heartiste’s facts; he merely tries, in his jve talk way, to obfuscate them.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 11:50 am HerpDerp

      Don’t trust a young Japanese person on Japanese history in WWII, Rape of Nanking denial is rife.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:04 pm Anonymous

        Yeah, almost as bad as Balangiga Massacre denial. Well, maybe denial is the wrong word, since it’s pretty hard to deny something that is almost completely unknown as it never appears in textbooks, even though it is on the same degree as Nanking. Google it.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 6:13 pm corvinus

        Oh, I know that the Japs were pagan savages with no regard for human life… but still, the bombing of Nagasaki (instead of Kokura or wherever else they were going to bomb) was unjustified.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 12:20 pm Inane Rambler (Formerly Unending Improvement)

      They also wanted to maintain most of their Empire. The Japanese government was deluded until the end.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:25 am thwack

        indeed; might I add that it was a government that none of the Japanese civilians (including the children) had a chance to vote into or out of power.

        White Americans are masters of rationalizing their crimes away.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2013 at 4:31 pm thwack

        Actually, more disturbing than burning a lot of civilians up with a huge bomb, which has its own justifications; experimenting on civilians with a new destructive energy source is a much larger crime. The injuries and sickness from burns and radiation were tracked and studied and provided a wealth of information which as the survivors of both bombs were told “would greatly benefit mankind”.

        I guess they took one for the team eh?

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 12:20 pm Rogue Male

      Kate, your student was reflecting Japanese revisionism pimped by people like Akira Iriye. A definitive treatment of (a) how the Japanese were NOT preparing to surrender, but were in fact preparing to resist to the death and (b) how bloody an invasion would have been if nukes were not used, is _Downfall: The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire_, by Richard B. Frank (1999).

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 1:27 pm Libertardian

        Even when Japan was ready to surrender, there was an attempted coup d’état to prevent it.
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ky%C5%ABj%C5%8D_Incident

        @Bob Wallace: Also, unlike the de-nazification of Germany, the US installed many bureaucrats into top positions in Japan’s post-war government who had cut their teeth governing Manchukuo (source: Princes of the Yen, by Richard Werner).
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crimes_in_Manchukuo

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:27 pm Trimegistus

        Frank’s book includes such fun details as an interview with a Japanese woman who was in high school at the time. She was issued a leatherworking awl and told to stab an American soldier with it. Not using the atomic bombs would have caused the greatest bloodbath in human history — literally millions of Japanese civilians and soldiers would have died.

        And if the bomb was so fucking inhumane and excessive, why did it take two? Why didn’t the Japanese throw in the towel after the first “inhumane, excessive” strike? If it takes two and the threat of more to just focus their fucking attention, then I think maybe the nuclear attacks were appropriate and humane after all.

        This is more “shit on America” talk. Every single historical incident must be twisted and lied about in order to make America the bad guy.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 6:45 pm Vicente0309

        ^^^^This^^^^^^
        Threadwinner

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:23 pm Hyperborean

        “This is more “shit on America” talk. Every single historical incident must be twisted and lied about in order to make America the bad guy.”

        Bad Guys? More like useful idiots.

        It is the Germans who truly get “shit on”; the Americans were the white knights who waltzed in and saved the day by destroying the satanic Nazis, or so the kosher version of history goes.

        Hitler was the real threat to ZOG’s power, the pearl harbor attack (which many argue FDR had advance knowledge of) was the pretext they used to get American into the war against the one country which had usurped the chosen tribe and dismantled their parasitic money system.

        The American casualties in the Pacific theater were simply collateral damage; but hey, who cares about a few hundred thousand stupid goy lives anyway?

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:07 pm Zander

        Your interpretation of history is laughable and bordering on sacrilegious. Most of you who believe FDR was looking for an excuse to get into the war so he could save the chosen tribe, love revisionist history and love to make America look like the evil party here, just like the liberals think America is the evil party for daring to win the war in utilizing the A bomb. First, FDR was no tribe lover, and in fact he never lifted a finger to save the tribe even when he knew your beloved hate fiend was murdering them in the gas chambers, and this is no kosher version, it’s the true version. Second, your beloved hate fiend, may he roast in hell, didn’t do anything to help white folk. In fact, he killed his own people and other whites throughout Europe (remember the Slavic people he murdered?). He had no mercy for anyone, just hate and murder. I wouldn’t be praising him or his actions as if he did anything good for whites. He is the ONLY reason liberals have managed to convince Western society that whites are evil and looking to subjugate other races. Had your hate fiend not invented racial mass murder, liberalism wouldn’t have exited today. For the past 70 years, liberals have used your hate fiend’s actions as an excuse for race equality and affirmative action. It’s laughable that you revere him so much when he is the direct reason you’re so unhappy and miserable today. Watch, Europe is on its way to collapsing – one by one – each one of the European countries is going to fall within the next 10 years, even Deutschland. Poetic justice? I’ll say so! Justice comes to everyone in the end.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:26 pm Hyperborean

        So its ok for the Americans to drop atomic bombs on the Japanese, and firebomb German women and children, but when Hitler supposedly kills innocents he’s a fiend? What a convenient double standard.

        Hitler didn’t start the second world war. The atrocities you described have been deliberately exaggerated, but even if they weren’t exaggerated they would still pale in comparison to what the allies did to Germany, unfortunately that chapter of the WW2 has been conveniently excised from history.

        Since you just recited the bullshit version of history that we’ve all had drilled into our heads since childhood like you were reading from a script; i will assume your familiar with the Big Lie technique?

        It goes like this. Hitler brainwashed the German people by telling them really big lies. He told them lies of such an enormous magnitude that it became very difficult for the average individual to accept them as false, because doing so would essentially destroy their worldview.

        Unfortunately the Jewish media understands they can say whatever they want about Hitler, and not one person in a thousand will take the time to read Mien Kampf and see what he has to say for themselves. In Mien Kampf Hitler outlines how the Big Lie technique works and explains that it is a JEWISH strategy and tries to warn the European people to beware of it.

        The Jews now have the audacity (or chutzpah as they like to call it) to use the Big Lie technique, to lay the blame for the big lie technique on the one man who tried to warn our people about it.

        The Kosher version of WW2 which you just described is a really Big Lie, a lie designed to to make the perpetrators of the war look like innocent victims, and the true victims look like Fiends.

        The American people do not control their government, and have not controlled it since FDR; any person who doesn’t understand this basic principle really isn’t worth taking the time to refute.

        Good day

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 3:38 pm Zander

        LOL, what an idiot. You believe your own delusions, much like your hate fiend whom you revere so much believed his own delusions. That was his downfall. When people lie to themselves in order to make a falsehood a reality and make themselves feel better, they end up destroying themselves. Your hate fiend lied to himself and his own people, and the fact he killed 20% of the Slavic people doesn’t seem to bother you, right? So long as he also killed the chosen people, you forgive him his other atrocities, right? There are some stupid humans on the planet who are so consumed with hate, they rather see their own people suffer so long as the people they hate are destroyed in the process. That was the mindset of your hate fiend, and it’s yours too.

        There is a rule of thumb for idiots like you and it goes like this:

        When one hates the chosen people, usually he hates everyone else too. I have yet to find an example of a person who hates the chosen people and who is also a good and decent person? It doesn’t exist. People who hate the tribe have an axe to grind. Their hate for the tribe stems from their unhappiness and jealousy with the successful and they view the tribe as successful.

        Your hate fiend was a nobody – he had no education, he was a bastardy child, and possibly gay. His falling short in the social department made him lash out on the people he thought were better than him. That was the whole reason behind WWII. It was caused by someone so frustrated and feeling powerless that he needed to take all his aggression on his neighbors the Slavics, and on the chosen Tribe. I think you suffer form the same disease. I bet you haven’t gotten laid in ages and no woman wants to fuck you. I guess that explains your hate for the ones who are more successful than you and your strong reverence for a loser hate fiend who has destroyed his own country and 90% of Europe. Don’t you have real heroes to emulate, you loser?

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:08 pm Anonymous

        No. ^^^^THIS.^^^^^^^^
        Is the threadwinner.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 2:40 pm cynthia

      The Japanese lie in schools about how WWII went down. I’ve heard it’s getting better – and with the Internet, I’m sure that’s helped more young people understand what really happened – but it’s still a fairly common thing for a Japanese student to think the Americans shot first and shot last. The Rape of Nanjing, Japanese aggression in Korea and Manchuria, Pearl Harbor, Unit 731, the treatment of POWs, the invasions of southern islands, and the refusal to surrender are all typically whitewashed. It was a war of atrocities, and even in the West, most of it’s been forgotten.

      Amusing, though, is visiting Hiroshima. Americans are typically quiet and respectful. The Japanese kids are jumping all over each other, giggling about the bombing, and snapping photos with their cell phones like they’re at the damn zoo. The exact opposite of what ones sees at Pearl Harbor, where Japanese tourists go in smiling and come out crying.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:26 pm whorefinder

        Yes, but we need to remember the Americans who visit Hiroshima are usually Japanophiles who are educated and relatively well off—wiggers and gangstas and schoolkids from the U.S. usually do not visit Hiroshima. Meanwhile, the Japanese kids are just on a school trip. I remember my school group visiting Washington D.C. and nearly starting a fight over a girl—at the Holocaust museum. Yes, and we had Jewish kids in our group rolling their eyes at the tour guide’s excessive, dramatic nature.

        In other words, it’s schoolkids (naturally trite and disrespectful and too shallow to understand the incident) versus mature adults already half-in-love with Japan.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:27 pm whiskeysplace

      The Japanese wanted a bloodbath on the home islands, to get a negotiated settlement, letting them keep Manchuria, SE Asia, much else. That was not going to be in the cards. An invasion would have cost millions of US troops lives.

      Truman dropped the bomb and shortened the war — this just in American voters prefer enemies instead of their men to die. Even so, Japanese officers staged an abortive coup AFTER the bombs to keep on fighting. Even AFTER Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:32 pm whorefinder

        +10

        I remember Jon Stewart calling Truman a “war criminal” for dropping the atomic bombs. He quickly tried to “take it back” the next night, but it’s clear that for him, more dead white goyim would be better than less.

        LikeLike


  13. on March 31, 2013 at 9:16 am 357

    OT but germane:

    I often read in the Manosphere comment sections horseshit regarding black dominant masculinity. Any non-black, who has REAL experience with the black cohort, knows these people are pack animals. Not to put too fine a point on it, but, alone, these feral creatures become wholly submissive.

    Any dumb-ass preaching to the contrary is unknowingly showing his panties and offering a menstrual stained admission that they consume way too much TV, where they’re: propagandized and treated to a never-ending cavalcade of sanitized and maculinized blackness.

    These flaccid idiots possess a psychology not unlike that of women.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:38 pm whorefinder

      Yes, it’s true. Separating blacks from their pack weakens them.

      However, putting them back in a group setting and they get belligerent and anti-social again. It’s why talking a violent black student into submission doesn’t work—as soon as they’re released for the day back home and return to a full classroom, they’re back to their usual antics.

      This is why when a city becomes over 15% black (as Paul Kersey at StuffBlackPeopleDon’tLike has said), it promises to become unlivable–as a 15% population of blacks is all the concentration you need to begin mass riots and sharp upticks in crime—which drive non-black people out and bring more black people in. 15% is a critical mass.

      Once upon a time in this country, many deeds to land contained clauses tracing back several owners that barred blacks from owning the land. If our ancestors could understand that blacks posed a threat to civilization, why can’t we?

      LikeLike


  14. on March 31, 2013 at 9:28 am Lily

    “What facets of black male culture create so many homicides?
    Why are so many black men and boys producing and entertaining themselves with violent gangsta rap and other media?
    Why do black men buy, sell and steal guns for killing; attend gang initiation drives; and demonstrate for unrestricted white male culpability disproportionately more than people of other ethnicities or races?”

    Let’s face it, the answer is so simple, yet so true it might sound too simplistic: Blacks don’t have any White values. Their traditions and values come from African voodoo, not the Bible. So it’s obvious why their communities have been in such social turmoil. Nowhere can you tell this more than from the state of marriage in the Black community. Most Black kids are born out of wedlock, and the single Black mother is the leader in single motherhood and bastardy behavior. Her children end up living on the street, getting into trouble with gangs, while she collects money form the US Government that she spends on her atrocious nails and hair. The US Government makes this behavior possible and perpetual. If the US Government stopped rewarding Black mothers for having kids out of marriage, half these problems would be solved and the Black murder rate would be lower. Unfortunately, like with everything else, our government makes everything worse. The government should get out of social and religious issues and that includes marriage, divorce, the family, education etc. Let people solve their own social issues and fight their own battles, while the government only protects the peace and protects the borders. On the other hand, the government increasingly picks winners and losers. It picks the interest of minorities, women, and especially Blacks over whites and especially over White men. This is going to lead to ruin of this society. The only way our society can survive is by preserving our traditional values (which the government is doing everything in its power to destroy) that help make White society the success of the earth.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:48 pm Nicole

      If their values came from Vodun, they would never have children out of wedlock, and they would have to pay their husband to get a divorce.

      So it’s a loss of Vodun values and assimilation to do-whatever-you-want feminism that has screwed them up.

      LikeLike


  15. on March 31, 2013 at 9:40 am Anonymous

    For more unfiltered information visit http://www.amren.com

    LikeLike


  16. on March 31, 2013 at 9:42 am Uncle Elmer

    You are being a little harsh on the Childress sisters, who live in Oregon and know a lot about black folks. Their website is also chockfull of useful advice on sexual matters, such as how to attract “Lusty Female Sexual Energy”, which for starts means “getting rid of hierarchies in the bedroom”.

    As their wisdom is diametrically opposed to your world-view perhaps you are feeling pangs of discomfort. It’s called “pegging”, get used to it.

    LikeLike


  17. on March 31, 2013 at 9:43 am Anonymous

    http://http://erectuswalksamongst.us/

    LikeLike


  18. on March 31, 2013 at 9:44 am Anonymous

    http://erectuswalksamongst.us/

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 12:31 pm thwack

      Thanks for the Erectus link. Serious Alternative evolutionary theory is difficult to locate due to weJ pc policing…

      very interesting.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 2:08 pm thwack

        OK, I skimmed the whole thing. If you can ignore the white supremacy narrative, its got beaucoup data which you can use to construct any narrative you want ( for example, the Geselle schedule). After all, a narrative is really just a good story; and a good story doesn’t hafta be true for most people to accept and distribute.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 9:53 am Dan Fletcher

      Thanks. Bookmarked for later reading.

      LikeLike


  19. on March 31, 2013 at 9:48 am Adam

    lol

    I clicked on the original article and found some gems:

    Time to stop being sluts:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/time-to-stop-hooking-up-you-know-you-want-to/2013/03/29/87496b66-8cc4-11e2-9f54-f3fdd70acad2_story.html

    Victim mentality on roids:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-my-twin-sisters-rape-there-were-many-victims/2013/03/28/09ac8442-9622-11e2-894a-b984cbdff2e6_story.html

    LikeLike


  20. on March 31, 2013 at 10:02 am bhodi1555

    As a member of the law enforcement community, you realize very quickly the only thing keeping African Americans down is African Americans. The perpetual welfare state that the political establishment subscribes to does nothing but create a power base for our elected officials. Black leaders are not going to challenge their political status quo and loose their power.

    LikeLike


  21. on March 31, 2013 at 10:07 am Uncle Elmer

    Though from their outstanding curriculum vitae it’s safe to assume they have shared a brother man between them (who referred to himself as “The Good Thing Man” or “Sugar Dick”). Who among us has not contemplated checking off the “Twins” statistical improbability?

    LikeLike


  22. on March 31, 2013 at 10:21 am feministx

    What exactly is the plan to get white people to publicly affirm that they do not hate themselves?

    At my workplace, all my co workers have together agreed that race is a social construct. The powerful invented it to keep people divided. So, does anyone have some plan of how masses of people will be convinced to think and speak otherwise?

    In my life, I have seen one indication of where the change would come from. When i was in grad school, I saw a presentation by a faculty member in the school of education. She was representing kindergarden teachers. She proved with data that these teachers of 5 and 6 yr olds were being unfairly blamed for lack of progress and lack of children at grade level. Basically, she showed that the students came to the class at a certain level and with certain propensities for learning and that the teachers could only work with what they had. The conclusion was that students of certain race groups had fallen behind before age 5 and that it was already very difficult to make up for this gap.

    Nothing extraordinary about the study except that it came from a leader in a teacher’s union and from a faculty member at a famously left wing school. It seems that teachers are starting to stand up for themselves because they are being tasked with the impossible and docked salary and opportunity because they can’t make poor minority students score at grade level.

    LikeLike


    • on April 7, 2013 at 1:01 pm eyeslevel

      “At my workplace, all my co workers have together agreed that race is a social construct. The powerful invented it to keep people divided. So, does anyone have some plan of how masses of people will be convinced to think and speak otherwise?”

      Yes. It’s called “The Mantra.”

      http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/the-white-mantra/
      http://whitegenocideproject.com/category/beefcakes-bootcamp/
      http://whiterabbitradio.net/podcast-2

      LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2013 at 8:27 am eyeslevel

      Breed is a social construct.
      ..

      LikeLike


  23. on March 31, 2013 at 10:27 am Anonymous

    Let’s be fucking clear right now. I have NEVER heard anyone in the Black community demand that white people be held accountable for the ills in the black community. I come here for what is generally useful information but this post is absolute bullocks. if you’d like to use historical fact to justify why one race is more violent then another then white’s win hands down on that one. countless wars, conquests and atrocities need not be mentioned. The problem in the black community is one of poverty. Furthermore, I find it ironic that the same folks who stand up and shout about how “corrupt’ and “slanted” the “liberal media” is are constantly using exampled from it’s reports to prove their points. Go to ANY poor community in the world and you will find violence. Travel a bit I and guarantee that you’ll see it and perhaps experience it first hand. There is no denying that poor people’s problems can only be solved by those peoples, however denying the effects of certain historical FACTS such as slavery, segregation, etc, etc. etc. are just plane stupid and ignorant. The bottom line is, the world is becoming more diverse, as is our country, you can choose to ignore it, however it’s simple fact. I say again this is a problem of poverty not race.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:48 am Canadian Friend

      …Let’s be fucking clear right now. I have NEVER heard anyone in the Black community demand that white people be held accountable for the ills in the black community.

      then you have been living under a rock or you are lying trough your teeth.

      I come here for what is generally useful information but this post is absolute bullocks. if you’d like to use historical fact to justify why one race is more violent then another then white’s win hands down on that one. countless wars, conquests and atrocities need not be mentioned.

      If Africans had ever created a written language , they would have written history and it would show that they too have killed each others since the beginning of times. What happened in Rwanda – blacks murdering about 800,000 other blacks – can not possibly be the only time people in Africa have gone to war with each other.

      The problem in the black community is one of poverty.

      then why do poor – whites commit SEVEN TIMES LESS MURDER than poor – blacks???

      Furthermore, I find it ironic that the same folks who stand up and shout about how “corrupt’ and “slanted” the “liberal media” is are constantly using exampled from it’s reports to prove their points.

      We expose the lies of the liberal media and on the rare occasion that they say the truth we use it to show you that your friends – the liberal media – do agree with us.

      Go to ANY poor community in the world and you will find violence.

      There is less violence where poor people are white. There is more violence where the people are black.

      however denying the effects of certain historical FACTS such as slavery, segregation, etc, etc. etc. are just plane stupid and ignorant.

      Denying facts on murder by race is stupid and ignorant.

      The bottom line is, the world is becoming more diverse

      And this diversity is bringing more crime and decay to Western civilization

      I say again this is a problem of poverty not race. …

      Poor people who are white commit seven times less murders than blacks who are poor.
      Poverty is not the cause.
      Stop denying this.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 1:20 am lorem ipsum

        Poverty can’t be the cause, since dumping money by the dump truck loads on them hasn’t fixed anything and in fact appears to have made it worse.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 11:11 am 357

      Fucking liberal bullshit. Go shoot yourself.

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 11:17 am Customer Service

      Your premise is wrong. Poor!= violent. Look at parts of northeast England, or rural (poor) white Canada or America. There is no gang culture there. Look at rural China – terrible gang culture, right? Look at the boondocks of Australia – what degenerates! Again, no. In fact, people in those areas (Australia, Canada, Uk, USA) are some of the friendliest salt of the earth people you will ever meet – can’t speak about China since I’ve never been there. So poorness!=violence… at least for non whites.

      But maybe poverty just makes blacks violent, so the violence should disappear in wealthy blacks, right? Again, it doesn’t. Rich black rappers (Tupac), rich black athletes (Plaxico Burress), rich black political leaders (all of Africa). So the omnipresence of violent black culture exists in poor and wealthy blacks. Nobody seems to want to look at the obvious truth because it’s an affront to our sensibilities. Black culture is degenerate because… it is black culture.

      (Save Ghana – the only non fucked up black country in Africa, with hard working blacks, ala my personal anecdotal experience with Ghanian blacks).

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 1:38 pm Customer Service

        typo, last line 1st paragraph, “… at least for non blacks. “

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 11:39 am s

      More importantly than race (although I do agree with you to some extent) is the issue of family. The balck family structure has has been on it’s way out since 2nd since the advent of second wave femnism and the rise of state dependency.

      Think about it. If black women are led to believe that they don’t need no man to raise a kid with them (also, likely to be able to collect welfare, child support and public housing) and kids in general are much more likely to be criminals or exhibit violent, criminal, and antisocial behaviors… well, you see where I’m going with this.

      Big daddy gov’t and feminism for the win folks

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 8:51 am RappaccinisDaughter

        I remember reading a study that if you control for single motherhood, black and white crime rates are actually quite close. Of course it could be bullshit, but Chairman Ann herself quoted it, so I think that’s less likely than is frequently the case with studies of this type:
        http://www.rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/ann-coulter-on-single-mothers-the-statistics-from-guilty/

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 12:12 pm Starets

      That line worked in the past. After a while though, the never ending excuses wear thin. The west has tried to socially uplift blacks for decades now. Still violence, social dysfunction and barbarism remain the norm in the black community. Year after year it continues, and more and more whites are having their eyes opened, sometimes forcibly, to the fact that black communities just cannot function in western societies.

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 12:18 pm gunslingergregi

      naa man not every poor community in the world you need to travel more

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 12:33 pm Anon

      May Whorefinder have mercy on your soul.

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 12:36 pm gunslingergregi

      like I don’t know to maybe a poor white community in the states that hasen’t had blacks shipped in to it en mass to fuck it up
      pretty hard to find probably the government has done its work well

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 1:07 pm kubla

      Got to the Washington Post article. All CH did was take an article that a couple ugly spinster libs wrote about whites, and changed it to blacks.

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 2:45 pm OiledOldMan

      Look at you, riding in on your perfectly groomed little midget horse proclaiming your ignorance to the world.

      “LETS BE FUCKING CLEAR RIGHT NOW!” “FACTS!” “NEVER!”

      lol if you say so buddy.

      in your own words: “just plane stupid and ignorant”

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 2:50 pm cynthia

      I would agree it’s a problem of poverty. Basic societal structures have collapsed in the inner cities, leaving crime the only option out of poverty. The decay of the black community, however, was a direct result of liberal policies that destroyed families and marginalized men, all for the purposes of created a dependent class of votes who will always vote Democratic or risk personal destruction. Holding people accountable for their actions and thus, encouraging self-sufficiency through providing positive consequences for positive behavior, is the first step to undoing that mess. The problem is, whenever anyone points this out, they get conveniently labeled racist because the decay they’re talking about lies mostly in black communities. It’s a lovely little machine, really.

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 5:20 pm Anonymous

      The Appalachian people have more poverty than the EBT fed populations of black majority cities, but you do not have the same level of wanton killing. In the poorest communities of Thailand or Malyasia, where EBT and Section 8 sustenance would be considered luxurious, you will never see anything approaching the savagery of the black populace in “advanced” African countries like South Africa.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 8:33 pm driveallnight

        True enough about Thailand and Malaysia. I’d even toss in Philippines, although that one’s probably a wobbler.

        Let’s not talk about Cambodia.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 5:22 pm Uncle Elmer

        Even the worst slums in Cambodia are safe for pedestrian traffic.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 6:14 pm corvinus

      Let’s be fucking clear right now. I have NEVER heard anyone in the Black community demand that white people be held accountable for the ills in the black community.

      Then you must be deaf, blind, or dumb. Probably all three.

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 11:02 pm whiskeysplace

      Blacks demand all the time Whites grovel and abase themsevles for Black atrocities. See Dorner, Christopher, for example.

      Whites are generally law abiding and civil, until like the Japanese they explode in violence aided by high organization and technology. Black people are like most tribal peoples, characterized by high amounts of violence among anyone around them. That’s hunter-gatherer stuff.

      There are dirt-poor people in Thailand, China, the Phillipines, and Mongolia with almost zero crime. Blacks are wealthier than most in the world. The Nisei were interned, the Japanese nuked, Koreans had four armies rampaging over them; all had it far worse than Black people 1955-today.

      Diversity plus proximity = war. A more diverse America will resemble, as Lee Kwan Yew predicted, a place where race determines everything.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:54 am Nicole

        You’re asking Africans to grovel and abase themselves for European atrocities.

        Not going to happen. Suck it up and understand that people you help the wealthy to subjugate because you think you mean more to the system than you do, are not going to like you. They’re not going to consider you more civilized while your missionaries are raping their children and your women are treating you like ATM machines on an incubator.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 9:09 am Schnoorky

      “the world is becoming more diverse, as is our country, you can choose to ignore it” Give me a fucking break! I am NOT ignoring it. The world is not becoming more diverse you fucking retard. White countries and only white countries are forced to accept massive non-white immigration, give the recent immigrants affirmative action, special rights & privileges and are forced to “integrate” with them. This is obvioulsy a policy of white genocide. The world getting more diverse my ass. White countries and only white countries are becoming more “diverse”. Diversity is a code word for white genocide.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:26 am thwack

        White countries and only white countries are forced to accept massive non-white immigration,
        ——————————————————————————
        Wrong again. White people don’t belong to countries; countries belong to white people. White people don’t have a “side of the chess board”, THEY ARE THE CHESS BOARD! And don’t you forget it kneegger. “But, but, but, theres no white supremacy in outer space?” True, but you gotta travel through the white mans AIRSPACE in order to get there. Ever heard of a “no fly zone?”

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:38 am Nicole

        America was forced to accept massive European immigration, as was South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand.

        Those and other places invaded by Europeans, have seen unprecedented destruction of the indigenous cultures as well as the natural environment.

        You feel entitled to commit genocide, but then cry when someone just wants a tiny bit of room.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:45 am Dan Fletcher

        “destruction of the indigenous cultures as well as the natural environment.”

        Which is why we should close our borders to the 3rd world hordes.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:57 am Nicole

        Exactly. You should stop selling yourself as places where people from other countries can go to escape their problems because they just end up trading them for an even worse set of problems including but not limited to death of any semblance of manhood or womanhood or personhood that would have at least allowed them to die with dignity in their home countries.

        To run to a western country is like jumping in sewage to get away from irritating pollen.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:03 am Nicole

        I will give you this. Western countries, as good as anywhere else, can serve as a good place to retreat to and recover for awhile when your enemies are breathing down your neck. There should be a plan on arrival though, for return to one’s homeland as soon as it is possible and safe to. Immigration to a western country should not be viewed as a permanent move.

        The U.S. though, Europeans made their bed, as I’ve said before, on the bodies of Native Americans. You don’t really belong there. If you did, you would live in harmony with the land just like the Native Americans, and we’d be happy to have you…but you don’t. You’re still psychologically “living from a suitcase” as if whatever crap you create there, you won’t have to stew in.

        If you truly consider yourselves American, you have got to get used to the idea of yourselves belonging to the land instead of the land belonging to you. Not holding my breath for that though.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 4:11 pm Iain Johnston

        Nicole: it’s doubtful that what happened to the Native peoples in North America can be termed “genocide”, since there was never a concerted and wide- ranging attempt made to eradicate them; that is why for example where I live, in Canada, there are today more Native people than there were before the Europeans arrived (and they are generously supported by the mostly- white ranks of taxpayers). That’s a pretty piss-poor kind of “genocide”!

        But in any event if you are suggesting that multiculturalism is a just revenge for European colonization, why would whites simply choose to roll over and be complicit in their own destruction? It makes no sense from the standpoint of self- preservation, which after all is the only standpoint that matters. Am I just supposed to say, “ah well, some white man in the past did something wrong, therefore I should just accept my future status as a despised and (probably, since whites are blamed for all social ills even now) persecuted minority in my own community”? Why would I believe that? It would be suicidal insanity.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 5:10 pm Schnoorky

        Let me see, your game is that the son should pay for the father’s sins. Isn’t that right anti-white? Well, if that’s the case, when will reparations be paid to the ancestors of all of the native “americans” who were enslaved and massacred by the Aztecs? When will reparations be paid to the ancestors of all the Europeans who were enslabed by the Arabs? Oooh your game is fun anti-white. I can see why you like it soooooo much!

        I never genocided anyone. I don’t want to be genocided. I don’t want my sons, grandsons, etc. to be genocided. You’re just justifying White genocide. You are one sick bitch! Just look at your last statement “you feel entitled to commit genocide, but then cry when someone just wants a tiny bit of room”! A tiny bit of room! No, you and other anti-whites like you want to make ALL WHITE COUNTRIES non-white!

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 5:34 pm Nicole

        Iain and Schnoorky, it may not seem fair to you, but this is only because you were raised in a culture of entitlement. Africans and damn near everybody else is aware that the sins of the father are passed down to the son because the damage done by the father doesn’t disappear just because he dies. Bonus, if the son helped out and wants to continue doing damage, he has no place to complain that people don’t like him.

        If you don’t want to be associated with wealthy exploiters or their useful idiots, then the simplest thing to do is stop wearing their labels and make it clear that you’re about self preservation, not sustaining a screwed up system.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2013 at 1:21 pm eyeslevel

        “Iain and Schnoorky, it may not seem fair to you, but this is only because you were raised in a culture of entitlement.”

        So, you’re saying entitlement justifies genocide?

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2013 at 4:39 pm Nicole

        Eyeslevel, it does in the mind of the overly entitled. There really isn’t a way to cure this. You can’t appeal to someone’s sense of morality who believes that what is best for them is what is best. It’s even worse when they don’t have a self whose self interest they could be more honestly acting in.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:39 am Nicole

        You sign up for diversity when you move into countries that already have people in them, dumbass. If you don’t want diversity, stay in Europe and close the borders.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 5:14 pm Schnoorky

        I never voted for “diversity”! I was born into an all white county in a nearly all white state. Now I’m forced to pay for section 8 housing for any non-white on the fucking planet to come and defile my community. If I disagree with this I’m called a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

        So let me get this straight anti-white. First you say diversity makes white countries stronger. Then you say that diversity does indeed equate to genocide and that white people deserve “diversity” because our ancestors genocided people in the past. Thank you for clearing that up you anti-white ghoul.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 5:47 pm Nicole

        I never said diversity makes anyone stronger. You’re confusing me with someone who cares whether or not you shag your sister. I don’t so long as you’re consenting adults.

        I’m just saying that it’s not immigrants’ fault that you have to pay for Section 8 housing. That is your leaders’ fault. You should take it up with them instead of crying at me while you take it up the ass.

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2013 at 1:28 pm eyeslevel

        So, if a representative introduced a bill to stop all non-white immigration you would not personally object?

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2013 at 4:42 pm Nicole

        If it was a bill to stop all immigration except through marriage or adoption of anyone of any color other than Native Americans, I would.

        Immigration of non Native Americans is how the population of exploiters and those dependent on them is unnaturally bolstered.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 9:42 am Dan Fletcher

      ” have NEVER heard anyone in the Black community demand that white people be held accountable for the ills in the black community.”

      wat

      That is literally ALL they do.

      LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2013 at 1:40 pm whorefinder

        Don’t bother; the black female denial hamster is strong with this one.

        She’d deny Jesus three times before the cock crows, that one.

        LikeLike


  24. on March 31, 2013 at 10:35 am The Karamazov Idea

    I see whatcha did there.

    Good job taking the twinbians to task, with their own words no less. Then again, the words of liberals are virtually the only thing we can beat them over the head with as they refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of any divergent opinions in the first place.

    LikeLike


  25. on March 31, 2013 at 10:49 am Anonymous

    Patrice O’neal said it best. “I love racism”

    LikeLike


  26. on March 31, 2013 at 10:55 am Rum

    Middle aged white guys care more about 2nd Amendment rights than other groups because that they care more about the whole concept of The Bill of Rights and limited government than any other group.

    LikeLike


  27. on March 31, 2013 at 11:03 am Wilson

    It’s the black market drug trade that’s violent, not the black men. They are pussycats compared Latino cartel operatives. You could question why it seems so hard for blacks to enter mainstream professions, but society is so corrupted that I would question the premise of why they should want to get student loans, pay taxes, marry sluts, etc.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:07 pm Nicole

      Thank you.

      Why should a Black man want to sign his life away to a hoe who is going to take half?

      Why should a Black woman try to look or behave more like a hoe who would take half?

      Why should I assimilate at all?

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 11:32 pm whiskeysplace

        Because socially, the path for a people (as opposed to a person) is through hard work, deferred consumption, education/skill development, dual-parent families, and refraining from the dead-end of street crime and thuggery. Even in the ghetto there are men like that. But Black women would rather the violent and dangerous, admittedly sexy, thug.

        Simply put, sex men = violent, poverty and dependence on Whites. Boring, unsexy men = path to wealth creation. But what the hey, Whites will pay for Black people forever. Right?

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 11:55 pm Nicole

        Again, why should I work hard to work in a cubicle doing an irrelevant job wasting my youth next to Jan when I could he having babies on time and serving my husband next to Olayinka or hey here in Israel next to Nurit, Omphofo or Fatima?

        Why should I live as a westerner when all around me I see westernized women screwing themselves, being unhappy, childless, unfulfilled, and fatter than they should naturally be at their ages?

        Westernization is what leads to the thuggery because the stupid lost sheep are following a shepherd who says they’re inherently inferior, incapable of doing anything but being a thug, and need assistance from the government to help the poor children whose fathers are inherently shiftless?

        Do you not understand where your ideas are coming from? It’s not from observing Africans in stable African cultures. It’s from observing Africans trying and failing to adjust to your screwed up cult of female entitlement.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:53 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Westernization is not the problem, it’s resistance to Westernization (“acting white” is rather disreputable to black people).

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 5:35 pm Nicole

        Acting white = cat lady.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:43 pm Syd Barrett

        Some logic Nicole. Why don’t you get your ass off your computer. Its a WESTERN invention you know. Almost totaly created by ” evil western white men”. God I love hypocrisy.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 7:07 am thwack

        Some logic Syd. Why don’t you stop walking upright. Its a savage kneeggar invention you know. Almost totaly created by ” lazy boot lips”. God I love hypocrisy

        LikeLike


      • on April 7, 2013 at 2:05 pm whorefinder

        lmao. Nicole thinks acting civilized is acting like a cat lady. And our resident shuckin’ and jivin’ boy, thwack, thinks the savage races invented walking upright—-you know, we walked upright before the races developed, right, boy?

        Wait, that’s “White mans history.” We should learn “black man’s history”, which includes whitey stealing all inventions from blacks, raping babies to save us from AIDS, cannibalism, and, of course, whitye being invented by black men

        God, these niggers are hilarious. When the welfare checks run out, I give them two weeks.

        LikeLike


  28. on March 31, 2013 at 11:12 am RHeydrich

    Anonymous: Are you fucking stupid, son? Yes, yes you are.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reparations_for_slavery#Demands_for_reparations

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whNE40AwVNo //God Damn America

    http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/023477.html //Professional race man says racism rendered obama incompetent in debate

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/03/29/ex-cnner_pundit_roland_martin_criticizes_white_male_executives_at_cnn.html

    http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/suburbs-secede-from-atlanta/

    “Atlanta’s NBC affiliate reports that the Georgia NAACP ‘accused Republican Governor Nathan Deal of being part of an alleged conspiracy to get rid of black office holders and deprive black voters of their rights.'”

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/10/michael_eric_dyson_goes_on_epic_pro-affirmative_action_rant.html

    “You got free labor, black intellectual power was used for your advantage.” Lol. Don’t make me laugh, you fucking turd. If that was the case, no wonder the Confederate States were soundly defeated.

    The reality that you and other equalists will never, never, never acknowledge because to do so would destroy all your idiotic liberal fantasies, is that this isn’t a problem of poverty. It’s a problem of blacks and whites not being the same. In this case, it’s not being the same in the way intelligence evolved.

    Put aside the (large body of) evidence on racial differences in IQ for a second. Think to yourself: does lower average black intelligence not explain our racial world as we observe it right now? More blacks in poverty, more blacks committing crime of all sorts, blacks failing to reach the level of whites in income and educational testing and achievement despite DECADES of discrimination against whites in favor of blacks and welfare out the ass — lower average IQ explains all these far better than some bullshit “structural,” “institutionalized” white racism. Whiskey: “Black culture’s fatal flaw: toxic levels of self-esteem mixed with manifest incompetence and lack of any driving fear of failure or doubt.”

    I don’t give two squirts of piss if anyone doesn’t like the fact that blacks on average are less intelligent than whites. That’s too fucking bad. In the United States we passed the point where we could have an amicable or even civil discussion about this question a long time ago. In this country the powers that be in the government, the university, the courts and the media have made it abundantly clear that whites are the enemy and will forever be on the hook for the failures of an obviously inferior race of people. Fuck that!

    Upon Muhammad Ali’s return from his fight in Africa, “the rumble in the jungle,” a reporter asked him what he thought of Africa. He replied, “Thank God my granddaddy got on that boat.”

    http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/022582.html

    Beständig fortschreitend, der ewige Sieg.

    LikeLike


  29. on March 31, 2013 at 11:27 am Anonymous

    Geez, I’d expect there to be a little more thought about this from someone who regularly trumpets the superiority of the white race. It is undeniable that immigrants, and not refugees, do better because they are a self-selected group. Have you done any research as to whether black immigrants do worse than other immigrants?

    My guess would be that they achieve the same levels of prosperity and have the same propensity towards crime.

    The black violence problem in America is an American problem.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 12:04 pm goodspeed

      “Have you done any research as to whether black immigrants do worse than other immigrants?”
      In Europe black immigrants are the lowest performing group, and blacks in Britain commit more crime than even African-Americans.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 2:13 pm Nicole

        Just a guess, but I’m thinking that there is something particularly wrong with western European culture that Africans simply fail to adjust to. It’s unsustainable for us.

        Lately, there has been some news buzz this side of the Atlantic about Ukrainians being particularly racist, and problems African immigrants are having in the Ukraine. This was apparently news even to most Africans living in the Ukraine.

        For the most part, Slavic people and African people live among one another just fine. Slavic people also have a tendency to be more masculinity friendly and less docile than is normal for Europeans.

        I think the reason Africans get along better among Eastern Europeans than western Europeans is because they know they had better, or someone is going to make sure they cease to be a problem. Just a guess.

        So instead of crying about how the world should change so that docile people don’t have to dirty their soft little hands to defend their own lives, maybe some people here should butch up and understand that Nature doesn’t and never is going to reward passivity with anything but enslavement.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:35 pm Jeff

        This is ridiculous. I have been in the Ukraine in the last couple of years, and was surprised to see black people there. So I started asking questions. These were students at local universities. Many (most maybe?) didn’t like them being there. Some restaurants forbid them from their establishments.

        Keep in mind that Ukrainians keep their opinions close to the chest for the most part, so the amount of vitriol that I heard was a bit surprising. The Africans that were there all seemed to be very quiet and law-abiding. They were all grad students, not common thugs. Nevertheless, the locals weren’t happy with them being there.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:30 am Nicole

        Few locals are ever happy about others being there. You should ask them what they think of Russians, so you have what to compare their reactions to.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 3:39 pm Anonymous

        1. needs citation

        2. See 1 and add on comparable study in the US

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 6:11 pm goodspeed

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_Kingdom
        “The British Crime Survey reveals that in 2004, 87,000 people from black or minority ethnic communities said they had been a victim of a racially motivated crime. They had suffered 49,000 violent attacks, with 4,000 being wounded. At the same time 92,000 white people said they had also fallen victim of a racially motivated crime. The number of violent attacks against whites reached 77,000, while the number of white people who reported being wounded was five times the number of black and minority ethnic victims at 20,000.”

        “Figures from the Office for National Statistics showed that in 2007 an estimated 10.6 percent of London’s population of 7,556,900 were black.[23] Evidence shows that the black population in London boroughs increases with the level of deprivation, and that the level of crime also increases with deprivation, such that “It is clear that ethnicity, deprivation, victimisation and offending are closely and intricately inter-related”.[24]

        In June 2010 The Sunday Telegraph, through a Freedom of Information Act request, obtained statistics on accusations of crime broken down by race from the Metropolitan Police Service.[n 2] The figures showed that the majority of males who were accused of violent and sexual crimes (including those subsequently acquitted) in 2009–10 were black. Of the recorded 18,091 such accusations against males, 54 percent accused of street crimes were black; for robbery, 59 percent; for gun crimes, 67 percent; and for sexual offences, 32 percent.[25]

        Street crimes include muggings, assault with intent to rob, and snatching property. Black males accounted for 29 percent of the male victims of gun crime and 24 percent of the male victims of knife crime.[25] Similar statistics were recorded for females. On knife crime, 45 percent of suspected female perpetrators were black; for gun crime, 58 percent; and for robberies, 52 percent.

        Operation Trident was set up in March 1998 by the Metropolitan Police to investigate gun crime in London’s black community after black-on-black shootings in Lambeth and Brent.[27]

        Between April 2005 and January 2006, figures from the Metropolitan Police Service showed that black people accounted for 46 percent of car-crime arrests generated by automatic number plate recognition cameras.[28]

        In London in 2006, 75% of the victims of gun crime and 79% of the suspects were “from the African/Caribbean community.””

        http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7856404/Police-statistics-shed-fresh-light-on-link-between-crime-and-race.html
        “”

        Here is the “Color of Crime” study:

        http://colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.html

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 5:52 pm Anonymous

        That’s an irrelevant citation.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2013 at 6:35 pm goodspeed

        How is it irrelevant?

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 3:58 pm DatBro

        you really don’t know what the fuck you are talking about wrt Britain.

        white chavvies are equally a greater problem than white men in the states.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:26 pm Nicole

        According to the sheltered suburbanite posters here (thankfully in the minority) there is no such thing as a chav, and if there is, it’s Black people’s fault. If it weren’t for the presence of Black people, nobody White would be a criminal or violent. All White people are angelic and sweet and just want the world to recognize their inherent superioritaah.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 11:54 pm whiskeysplace

        No. We want Black people to act like Nisei. That’s it.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:00 am Nicole

        Nobody gives a crap what you want. Africans don’t. Nature doesn’t. What matters is what you have the power to take and then maintain.

        You want the control without the work. Not going to happen.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:56 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Horseshit

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 4:21 pm Iain Johnston

        Sorry, but this is bullshit. Even a majority-white city with a reputation for violence, like Glasgow, will be vastly safer than its majority-black counterpart in the States. (The murder rate for Glasgow is 3.3 per 100,000; that of Detroit, 48.2 per 100,000). I lived in Belfast when I was a boy and in the peak era of Catholics and Protestants killing each other the murder rate was something like 5 or 6 per 100,000.

        LikeLike


  30. on March 31, 2013 at 11:31 am Anonymous

    Hey, it’s all Whitey’s fault– burn, baby, burn! Where’s my free phone! (You know, we’d be a lot further along toward what MLK, Jr. wanted, if it weren’t for Democrats… heck, it was Democrats who started the KKK.)

    LikeLike


  31. on March 31, 2013 at 11:43 am Krakonos

    “Why do black men buy, sell and steal guns for killing; attend gang initiation drives; and demonstrate for unrestricted white male culpability disproportionately more than people of other ethnicities or races?”

    For pussy.

    LikeLike


  32. on March 31, 2013 at 12:07 pm Mtler

    Please stick to game posts. That’s way better than changing a few words from another article for a semi-satirical post

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 12:18 pm Starets

      No, I thought this was a great post. The topic is very timely, what with the ongoing black crime epidemic, and the mass immigration soft genocide of whites in all western countries. Everyone needs to think about these issues, whether they want to or not, as the process of swamping white societies instituted by our hostile elites is proceeding at a such a speed that a point of no return will be reached very soon.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 12:46 pm Starets

        In addition to what I said above, I have to say that I also really like the game posts. However, the red pill encompasses many different subjects, and there are a lot of pretty little lies to demolish over and above those that are spun out by womens’ hamsters.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:14 pm anononono

        indeed, the red pill may require you to lose the sensitivity neutering that women have placed upon and recognize real dangers.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 11:38 pm Mtler

        It would be much more interesting post if it wasn’t a passive aggressive post with racist undertones. Yes, the issue needs to be addressed. How about actually addressing the issue instead of addressing that the issue needs to be addressed?

        Let’s talk about how being born in poor ghetto hoods, surrounded by violence and crime, in a society where crime and violence is glorified to obscenely unhealthy levels in the media, and having role models that get rich off drugs, violence, crime or singing about those three will probably exponentially increase your likelihood of committing violent crime. This is true whether you are black, white, mexican, chinese, native

        Let’s talk about how guns are easier to obtain than weed.

        Let’s talk about how black immigrants from West Africa/Islands who can afford a university education are way less likely to commit crimes than African-Americans.

        Let’s talk about how being poor with no education and with very little chance for upward social movement besides dealing leads you to frequent dangerous people and adapt in a sink or swim world without any safety nets

        Yes, let’s definitely start talking objectively without being influenced by preconceived ideas. Then we’d get somewhere.

        Let’s talk about America

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:37 am Dan Fletcher

        “It would be much more interesting post if it wasn’t a passive aggressive post with racist undertones.”

        Heh. Did you levy the same criticism against the original post? Or just the raaayycist one here?

        “Let’s talk about how black immigrants from West Africa/Islands who can afford a university education are way less likely to commit crimes than African-Americans.”

        Not a representative sample. Those immigrants are the far-right of the bell-curve. Just because the far-right of the curve exists doesn’t mean the curves are equal.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 4:43 pm The Truth Hurts

        White kids who grow up in the same neighborhoods and attend the same schools as blacks, EVEN if the whites are a minority STILL far exceed blacks in test scores, college admissions, and lower crime rates. It’s not the where you’re from, it’s the genetics+culture+internal motivation=outcome.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 3:49 pm driveallnight

      Fuck you

      LikeLike


  33. on March 31, 2013 at 12:25 pm WhoCares

    Being racially objective from birth, I noticed pretty early on that the brothers are more emotional than other men of race on a day to day basis. Coupled with the incessant need to chatter, peacocking and herd building…. I consider them more feminine in their personalities beneath Al the “masculine” bravado, end result, I take very few of them seriously as most are unable to face up to their own nature without assploding ;D

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 4:45 pm The Truth Hurts

      The problem is they have the emotional capacity of women, but the physical capacity of men. Black men flip out of the the most seemingly inconsequential things. Especially if 3 or more congregate, the danger levels increase exponentially.

      LikeLike


  34. on March 31, 2013 at 12:26 pm Nicole

    So…nicer is healthier?

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 12:40 pm thwack

      So…nicer is healthier?
      ——————————-
      Hmmm…?

      lets find out from the SECOND most angriest black man in the world:

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 12:48 pm Nicole

        I like this guy. 🙂

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 1:56 pm WhoCares

      lol no silly. It’s not NICER if you have feminine thinking in a masculine body cause that means you make decisions based on emotions and for a man those decisions mean life or death…ergo all the violence. I believe it is a by product of evolution in Black Societies that these skills helped the genetic line survive but in a “diversity” (heh) environment, it is as ze french wud say ” ‘orrible ” xD

      LikeLike


  35. on March 31, 2013 at 12:41 pm Nicole

    Yes, Africans should be more docile and nonviolent. This would make us easier to control, and we could all live in peace and drink koolaid together singing happily in the meadow. While we’re at it, let’s have government selected breeding programs to breed aggression out of the lower classes. That would be just peachy.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 1:18 pm Rogue Male

      “I’m B-B-Better when I’m rehearsed.” – Claudius

      “So is a trained monkey, but he still looks and sounds every inch a monkey.” – Livia

      _I, Claudius_

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 1:27 pm whorefinder

      lol warpig.

      Note how violence, low IQ, and anti-civilized behavior, to a warpig, is a “good” thing to “fight the man.”

      Leftists always justify their actions, especially negro actions. Note: Emmit Till, black panthers, flash mobs, oj.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 1:52 pm Nicole

        I would rather be justfying men being men than men being pussies. You want the meek to inherit the Earth. This is just not how it works.

        How do you figure anyone is going to pay for their crimes without someone nutting up and being a bit less civilized? What are you going to do, sit and have tea and beg people to stop killing you?

        Or…do what African Americans did and be less docile?

        You don’t stop getting crapped on until you start being violent. That’s how the world works. Get over it.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:29 pm Rogue Male

        The problem, er, one of the many problems with this version of events is that black people are killing lots and lots of…other black people. The overwhelming number of people assaulted and killed by blacks are…other blacks. They’ll kill whites when the opportunity arises, sure, but they are not for the most part fighten’ da powah, they’re just slaughtering one another and generally shitting in their own nests (Exhibit A: Deetroit; Exhibit B: Chicongo; etc., etc., ad nauseum).

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:43 pm Nicole

        A culture’s members regulate themselves or perish by the hands of their own criminals. The problem with the Black community, as I see it, is that others are trying to regulate our criminals, when we know how to handle them best. When we do though, we’re jailed right along with them.

        So…when there’s nothing to do but look out for yourself and your loved ones, you do what needs to be done regardless of whether or not you’ll be punished for it. Outsiders see all “Black crime” as the same, but we don’t.

        If someone attacks me or someone I care for, or a vulnerable person within my range of sight, I will use lethal force and do that time with a smile.

        I respect others who are like that. I have no respect for people who are not like that, or who consider this wrong.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:36 pm Primus Pilum

        Ah, I see, Deetroit and Chicongo are shitholes because whitey is jalin’ all de ‘onest folk fightin back gainst “yo” crimnals cuz whitey, he treet gang banga and self-deefense all da same.

        Thought experiment: if every black/mullato/whatever in the US went to sleep tonight and didn’t wake up (all 33 million of them), would that be a net loss or a net gain for the USA?

        Let’s see…on the down side, we lose Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Ben Carson, and maybe – maaaaaybe – one hundred thousand decent, hard-working, upstanding citizens. Fuck it, call it a million, just for laughs.

        Now for the upside of being done – finally! – with the other 32 million muthafukkas: the prisons are suddenly half-empty, the crime rate overall plummets by half to two-thirds, the murder rate drops by around half (still the Latins out there doin’ their thing – ole!), bajillions saved on HUD, Aid to Dependent Crack Hos, No Piccaninny Left Behind, Affirmative Racism – all of it, flushed down the shitter with the 32 million. The culture is no longer polluted with all the shit that’s been pumped into it by the bruthas, and best of all, we don’t have to listen to any more of your bullshit rationalizations for why everyone else in the USA can make it but you sad sacks of shit can’t.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 6:16 pm corvinus

        If someone attacks me or someone I care for, or a vulnerable person within my range of sight, I will use lethal force and do that time with a smile.

        Among whites, Texas justice is used all the time and justified, except in loonie libtard places like Chicago or NYC.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 7:05 pm Nicole

        Corvinus, apparently it is not used enough among European Americans to make a psycho think twice before he runs up on a woman with a baby in a stroller.

        First, how is a woman with a baby walking anywhere by herself in an area secluded enough for that to happen? (Answer: feminism.) Second, do you know how many guns can be concealed in a diaper bag?

        When European Americans wake up and stop living in an imaginary world where they aren’t required to back up their right of conquest with persistent force, then you can run around calling yourselves superior again, and people will again concede that though you’re wrong, you’re entitled to your opinion. As it is, you seem to be under this impression that utopia is attainable on a pile of (Native American) bodies, some not even 100 years in the ground.

        You can’t be angels and devils at the same time. Choose and don’t bitch about the consequences of your choices.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 8:04 pm Nicole

        Well, Primus, I’m not going to argue against the U.S. being better off without African Americans. You would certainly be better able to accelerate your path to being corporate farms with no man’s lands in between them.

        You see China? That’s your future.

        Meanwhile, I’m poolside in Israel where people aren’t so pussified.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 4:51 pm The Truth Hurts

        One of the big reasons that white people, and especially white men get shit on in America and the rest of the West is not that we are afraid of the feelings of minorities, we are afraid of OTHER white people. We don’t actually need to be violent to oppose black dysfunction and violence, we just need to be freely able to speak our minds. The more white men that speak their minds about the truth on race and feminism, the less people will put up with the behavior of blacks and the shitting on white men. I know in my extended group of friends and work associates, we are more freely than ever speaking the truth and it is a very refreshing thing indeed. It’s gotten to the point where nobody will say an anti-white man statement or belief around me, because I will raise hell and shut them down with the truth and others will back me up, and the anti-white man person will be the outcast who gets shamed.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 5:52 pm Nicole

        Finally! Testicles! Worldview is a bit limited, but at least you’re not a crybaby. Thank you.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 1:57 pm Nicole

        White people being superior because they’re nicer is the racial equivalent of it being inner beauty what really matters.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 3:32 pm 39kosice

        Strawmen, Nicole. One can be a gentleman and believe it civilization and still be strong and manly.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 7:55 pm Nicole

        One cannot be a gentleman and believe in civilization and still be a man in a culture wherein there are few to no ladies who also believe in civilization. To be chivalrous to shrews makes one not a man but a pussy.

        In order to have a reasonable civilization in which men can be both manly and civilized, that society must recognize and respect their manhood. Otherwise, it is a cruel and emasculating joke that you are a fool if you demand that those able to resist do not.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 6:16 pm corvinus

        Again, you keep confusing us with SWPLs and libtards.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 6:55 pm Nicole

        Us who? Different European or ancestrally European guys here have different positions. Some of you understand how the world works, and some of you don’t.

        The ones who don’t scream, “I’m superior to each and every one of those people, because a bunch of people who share some of my genes and/or are the same color as me are more civilized, commit less crime, and have higher IQ’s on average!”

        As if the argument that one, as an individual, is superior to an entire group of other people because of averages wasn’t nonsensical enough, the insistence that it is the slavish capitulation to females that makes them superior, that takes the cake.

        …that because your women feel safe to act a fool, you’re superior?

        …that because your politicians feel safe to screw you, you’re superior?

        Really?

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 11:32 pm RHeydrich

        Who said every white is superior to every black? NO ONE made that argument. NO ONE is talking about individual persons. The stupidity of your comment here exceeds the stupidity of all your other stupid comments combined. God DAMN you are fucking stupid! Get off it! FUCK!

        Fact: whites, on average, have higher intelligence than blacks. About 15% of blacks have IQs higher than the white average. The bell curves overlap. So what? The top of the white IQ curve is to the right of the black curve. Deal with it!

        The overarching point is that whites and blacks are not the same, not least when it comes to intelligence. Please stop your little nonsensical obfuscation of this. Race is real, race matters, and IQ matters. The fact that blacks and whites have different average levels of intelligence completely obliterates the entire basis of race relations in this country for the past fifty years: perpetual white culpability for black failure.

        Whites should take away from this that they are not responsible for black failure and do not owe blacks anything. The failures of blacks (and the relative successes of whites and Asians) derive almost entirely from the evolved conglomeration of characteristics of each group and not from anything else.

        http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1713275,00.html //Come Back, Colonialism, All Is Forgiven

        Ewige Sieg.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:57 am Nicole

        RH *you* may not be talking about individuals, but others are, and those are the ones I am calling idiots.

        Have a nice day.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 4:54 pm PA

      Yes, Africans should be more docile and nonviolent. This would make us easier to control

      American blacks are the most controlled group in the country. By corporations that sell trinkets and by leftists who have their use in maximizing black dysfunction.

      (I have several more comments in mod)

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:56 pm Nicole

        They buy the trinkets without buying the docility. Funny that.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:07 pm PA

        They buy McDonalds heart disease and Nike schoolyard killings. The CFOs are lovin it.

        Compare an average black family of 1950 to a subhuman EBT she-beast of today. The vote-buyers are lovin it.

        But they are not docile. They puff out their chests and jump up and down with manly bravado.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:09 pm Nicole

        It’s better than claiming one is superior because one is nicer.

        Seriously, I thought this was a game blog.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:18 pm PA

        See my comment abut the Amish when it comes out of mod.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:25 pm PA

        The “niceness” claim made by many conservatives and race-realists is not one I like to use. Yes, “niceness” to a certain point marks the difference between humanity and bestiality. But the “niceness” argument is one that some people make as a proxy to what they really want to say, but ill-advisedly wish to keep things race-neutral.

        White people are not “nice”. We never were. We are good, we are humane, but we never lacked for killers.

        The “niceness” argument is ultimately reductio ad Ned Franderum, something mainstream white patriots ought to stop using out of fear for speaking directly to race and to their right to exist.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:28 pm Nicole

        PA, I don’t believe in the new model of masculinity. Adaptation is great, but unnaturally twisting yourselves into girlymen and then demanding that everyone else in the world view you as superior for it is not going to happen. Even White women don’t find it appealing even though they vote for it. It is a legal shit test.

        Deciding that some people are inferior or somehow less human because they have trouble staying sane in an insane society is just silly. It’s something feminists do all the time to men, so it pains me to see you doing it to yourselves…deciding that being a man is criminal and wrong and that the most masculine among men in the U.S. are beasts moreso than yourselves because they do their best to be men.

        It makes me feel sad every time topics like this come up because I’m like, “How in the hell are dudes supposed to find their masculinity and deprogram when they’re being told that all of Nature should change so they don’t have to risk breaking a nail?”

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:31 pm Nicole

        PA, might makes right.

        That’s the whole of my argument in a nutshell. No mighty, no righty.

        So don’t ask someone else for your right to exist. Exist and persist regardless of how others with less might will view that.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 9:58 pm Musashi

      What do you think the outcome will be for blacks if a full-on race-war erupts? Maybe all this agitating isn’t smart. Maybe whites will remember how much they like killing, and start up the machine.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:03 pm Nicole

        Africa will still exist and be full of Black people.

        Who I worry for in the U.S. is Native Americans. You have much more to worry about from them than from African Americans.

        Not every “White” person is just European.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:53 pm whorefinder

        LMAO!

        The Native Americans? The civilized beings who lost the Americas due to the fact that they never united correctly, due to ethnic differences? The ones who exclude you from their tribes because you’re subhuman?

        They enjoy the trappings of civilization and taking your darky money at casinos.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:39 am Nicole

        At first it seemed we’d lost the Americas, but as it turns out, your culture is so self destructive that all we have to do is wait for you to naturally die out.

        Nature is a wonderful thing.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:41 am whorefinder

        LMAO!

        Oh warpig, if you think the “Native Americans” are going to embrace your fat, worthless ass and make you a equal with them after your kind are done bankrupting the system…

        lol. No, I shouldn’t spoil the surprise of her hanging.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 11:00 am Rogue Male

        No, but you did have to wait for us to show you what a wheel is.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 11:15 am Nicole

        Until Europeans came, we didn’t need wheels.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:17 am Dan Fletcher

        “Who I worry for in the U.S. is Native Americans. You have much more to worry about from them than from African Americans.”

        Gotta say Nicole, you may have a good grasp on malefemale dynamics but are delusional when it comes to any discussion on race.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:36 am Nicole

        I’m delusional because I believe that ethnicity should not be used as an excuse not to nut up?

        Because I think if European men want to be viewed as men they should get their own women under control before worrying so damned much about Africans?

        Because I don’t consider a culture in which the women are, by and large, useless for what women are good for, is not superior to my culture which teaches women to love motherhood, loyalty to their husbands, and cultivating the next generation of good mothers and fathers?

        What?

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:48 am thwack

        Musashi
        What do you think the outcome will be for blacks if a full-on race-war erupts?
        ————————————————————————–

        Thats the trick, white supremacy IS RACE WAR! Nonwhite people are only now starting to “return fire”. Without racism, white people can’t function as white because without mistreatment based on color, white people can’t even BE white.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:43 am whorefinder

        Without racism, white people can’t function as white because without mistreatment based on color, white people can’t even BE white.

        —hahahahaha. Jive talk always is hilarious when the stepin fetchits really get cranked out.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:58 am Rogue Male

        So…the Enlightenment and the Renaissance depended on the existence of people who couldn’t even invent the fucking wheel?

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 11:16 am Nicole

        Are you feeling enlightened when a White woman is sucking a Black man’s penis for pay?

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 11:26 am Rogue Male

        I feel a woman is enlightened when I grant her the opportunity to suck my penis.

        Clearly, your only intellectual response to the words “Enlightenment” and “Renaissance” is to reference black dicks and black men paying white women to suck them. A microcosm of the whole disparity, inadvertently supplied, I’m sure.

        Bottom line, if blacks disappeared tomorrow, the USA would be a better, happier place since a simple cost-benefit analysis shows that there is little benefit derived in exchange for the immense cost of the black presence in American society. The only good one is a dead one, 99 times out of 100.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 11:33 am Nicole

        If Blacks disappeared tomorrow, some White women would still be sucking their husbands’ best friends’, dads’ and dogs’ cocks.

        Handle your own mess because that’s not Black people’s fault any more than Black peoples’ mess is your fault.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 11:38 am Rogue Male

        So it’s really all about your envy and hatred of white women.

        Revealing.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 11:44 am Nicole

        No, it’s about my understanding that skank is not something to be proud of or pedestalize as progress and superior to ideals of loyalty.

        I should have envy for women who get to be so whorish and yet pedestalized, but I just can’t bring myself to do that. Reason is that I’ve met enough European men who aren’t crybabies and don’t penalize me for not being as much of an STD risk.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 11:51 am Rogue Male

        The only one confusing skank with progress is you. CH’s posts all present the philosophy that modern American women have morphed into a very strange, cock-riding beast thanks to feminazism, facilitated by men being equally(mal)conditioned by cultural propaganda from the left, and that reasserting male dominance is crucial (a) to the happiness of both men and women and (b) to the health of Western civilization.

        Pay attention, dear.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 5:58 pm Nicole

        I’m paying attention, Rogue. The question is why oh why, understanding what has become of western culture, do you insist on other people believing you are superior?

        How are you superior to cultures that do have their women under so much control that many generations and much social programming against it later, a woman like me figures out that she doesn’t want to be a part of the multikult full of cat ladies and skank?

        …and I am by far, not alone in this.

        As it is, the only really superior people among you are the ones who reject your culture, and for some reason they don’t have a problem with conscious Africans. Some of them even marry us.

        How is any culture superior when the women in it are debased?

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 3:59 am aleister

        Blacks have their women under control? Bwhahahahah

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 12:45 pm Nicole

        Aleister, this is in the Sudan, but I assure you this and worse happens in many places in Africa, and not just from Muslims. It’s fairly normal for a village to decide what the punishment is going to be for certain crimes, and carry them out in a public square.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 12:52 pm Greg Eliot

        So it’s really all about your envy and hatred of white women.

        Well, look who’s finally gotten on board.

        This wasn’t already well-established? Duh.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 6:14 pm Nicole

        Well Rogue and Greg, I’m not in denial of my baser nature. As the hippies would say, “Feel and deal.”

        Who wouldn’t be somewhat jealous of a group of people who regularly got away with murder, sometimes literally, and were still worshiped and pedestalized? Who wouldn’t want that kind of power?

        …but then I consider how crappy a person I would probably be if I had it, and what hordes of pathetic men I would have to sort through to find the one who could think for himself.

        One thing I like about the truth factor of this site is that they teach you guys how to properly deal with such women. If you’re here to justify keeping White women on their pedestal, you are at the wrong blog.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 6:22 pm Rogue Male

        Since you apparently missed this the first time I posted it, I’ll repeat it:

        Clearly, your only intellectual response to the words “Enlightenment” and “Renaissance” is to reference black dicks and black men paying white women to suck them. A microcosm of the whole disparity, inadvertently supplied, I’m sure.

        Let’s repeat that last bit again, for maximum effect:

        A microcosm of the whole disparity, inadvertently supplied, I’m sure.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 6:53 pm PA

        It’s fairly normal for a village to decide what the punishment is going to be for certain crimes, and carry them out in a public square

        Those kinds of punishments are decided by scheming jealous older women who sic their African equivalent of white-knight men, often their sons, on the younger woman (like honor killing) or against an unpopular woman (witch).

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 9:15 pm Nicole

        Rogue, you’re nitpicking and missing the point. Since I don’t know if you’re being obnoxious on purpose or not, I’ll just wait until you’re ready to discuss the price of “progress” and whether or not technology in and of itself, is a relevant measure of survival fitness.

        PA, either way, the women are under control. If I understand that, as a young woman, I am under the watchful eye of both the men and women of my tribe, and stepping out of line could result in shame, pain, or death, I am not going to step out of line. As an older woman, I understand that if I don’t make myself useful in a positive way, I will be viewed in a very negative way, so I am not going to step out of line.

        Understanding why something happens does not remove any of its effectiveness. This is another aspect of the European mentality that gets you into trouble. When you take apart a machine, it stops working, and so when you analyze a social situation, you somehow think that magically it should stop working too. It doesn’t. Reality still marches onward, and whether you know that it’s more the men or more the women keeping women in line, the system works. Saying that you know how it works doesn’t mean you won the argument because there it is, still working.

        African women in stable societies are very much under control. This desire to be good and do the right thing persists in all of us who are descended from people in those societies who had the option of unions with likeminded people.

        In the church, you have many examples of Africans who even got swept up in opiate drug use changing their lives suddenly, and blaming Jesus for that, when the truth is that it was more likely their genes than Jesus that enabled them to suffer through withdrawals and possible death at the hands of former fellow gang members, pimps, and the like, to better themselves.

        “You can’t keep a good man down.”

        Africans generally are very good at surviving tough situations how ever is needed. Without anybody needing to whip us in the street, many conscious African American women are getting back to their behavioral roots and rejecting feminism in favor of balance.

        So African women are very much under control. It’s just that the current version of White “progress” isn’t doing that. An African woman in a western society has to find her way home psychologically and spiritually, find her own way, or just won’t find it. That so many in western countries are lost says nothing of who we are in general.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 11:29 pm WhoCares

      Are you retarded? But that’s a rhetorical question.

      You went on thus whole “niceness” trollery without understanding what I was saying. Girl + black = prove my point.

      White men aren’t NICER you dumbass, they are MANLIER, because they have Manly personalities in Manly.bodies. Black males have GIRL personalities in MANLY bodies.

      Wtf, it takes 3 comments to get THAT across? XD

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 11:44 pm Nicole

        It will take you a few more because what you’re saying is that you’re saying I should like you better than African and other men well known and sometimes infamous for their actual masculinity because you’re somehow “new masculine”, which is retarded.

        You’re like the ugly girl looking at the cheerleader grumbling that she must be ugly on the inside.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 12:07 am whiskeysplace

      We’d like for two Black teens, one 14, the other 17, to refrain from executing point blank range a White baby in his stroller because his White Mom had no money when robbing her. We’d like Black sons of Obama to not rape, torture, and murder a White couple in Knoxville, two in Tulsa, and another White elderly couple there. We’d like Black “teens” to refrain from stripping White British tourists to humiliate them and then kill them because they had no money. And while we’re at it, we’d like Black people after ethnically cleansing Whites out of Detroit, Chicago, Newark, and many other cities to stop mooching taxpayer dollars out of Whites, and pay their own way.

      Blacks want to slaughter each other in a never ending mutual intifada? Fine. Then don’t complain when we treat Detroit like Thunderdome or Escape from New York. Don’t expect us to pay for it. Oh wait …

      Bottom line Black people can’t be independent of White money — they can’t even pay for themselves. And scream racism while engaging in the most depraved conduct possible: Two Black “teens” murdered a White baby in his stroller, the Black Mayor obstructed justice to protect them. That’s an entire community of people (again, Blacks) so depraved and lacking ordinary human feelings that they excuse the cold-blooded deliberate murder of a White baby in his stroller because he’s White. And the “community” covers for them and excuses them and protects them.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:46 am Nicole

        I don’t personally want anything from you or any other generic White Americans.

        When you bring that bull to me and people like me, we just want to know if we should judge you based on the worst of Europeans as well.

        If you’re okay with that then great, we can talk about how we just want you to not to douse Black female joggers in gasoline and set them on fire, and become missionaries so you can rape African children on the sly…or pose as medical aid workers so you can harvest our babies’ foreskins for stem cells to repair the jaws of those of you who can’t be arsed to brush your teeth or use a damned stick like we’ve been doing for at least 10,000 years before the first of you understood the necessity of cleaning your genitals.

        If we’re going collective credit and collective punishment, let’s have all the atrocity hang out and talk about King Leopold and Shark Island and polio vaccines made from chimpanzee organs infecting people in the Congo with HIV.

        If you’re taking collective credit for the civilization, you’ve got to take collective credit for the savagery and sickness of said civilization.

        In that, yes you are far superior to us.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:45 am whorefinder

        If you’re taking collective credit for the civilization, you’ve got to take collective credit for the savagery and sickness of said civilization.
        —rofl.

        Note, again, how the Queen Darky Warpig once again makes sure that all negro violence is now whitey’s fault. No darky is EVER at fault for his violence—it’s because whitey made him do it.

        you pee all over yourself, lol.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:09 pm Nicole

        What’s going on in the Congo now has gone way beyond what could be blamed on recovery from colonialism. If he or you were going to bring something up to blame me for that would be really bad, that would be the thing, if we’re going collective.

        Yet this doesn’t come to mind because all the killing going on in the Congo benefits your wealthy, who feed you news about one White baby’s death or hey, one Black teenager’s death to pull your heartstrings, when there are now more than 8 million people, many babies and many women and many teenagers dead.

        There is plenty atrocity to go around, and if we’re going to blame and believe individuals are inferior because of collective crimes against humanity, then let’s at least be real about it.

        Or we could have an adult conversation and stick to the point which is that nobody owes you any more than they owe me. I definitely don’t owe loyalty to people who want to kill or enslave me, or respect to people who are themselves slaves but crying in my direction about how it’s my fault they’re slaves when I’m not their owner.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 6:28 pm Bopbopbeepbop

      But blacks are already more docile and nonviolent when they are confronted by superior power. The reason Native Americans didn’t make good slaves is because they would rather fight to the death or would poison the slave master when he wasn’t looking rather than live as slaves. Once you showed blacks who the boss was, they would bow down for life. Even today, you do not see blacks going after whites who are armed or look intimidating. It’s always 5 or 6 blacks victimizing some old man or woman. So, yes I suppose blacks are more aggressive when it comes to preying on the weak, but they aren’t all that interested in fighting someone on equal terms.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:57 pm Nicole

        Now someone is at least making the right observations.

        Arabs were buying and selling African slaves long before Europeans. In fact, many Europeans were slaves of Arabs. By the time Europeans arrived with goods worth trading for large numbers of slaves, there were plenty who had been born slaves and were multi generation slaves.

        Some African slaves though, were prisoners of war. They were in the minority though.

        Then there were free Africans who went to the Americas for the same reasons many Europeans did.

        Unless it’s forced, like goes to like, and this tends to carry on for many generations.

        All kinds of lines get blurred when governments decide to create groupings for political and not natural reasons.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 6:47 pm Syd Barrett

      No, Africans can be as violent and lazy as they want, back in Africa that is. You know you immigrate there Nicole. Please consider it.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 7:00 pm Nicole

        I would have, but I got sidetracked by an Israeli who married me. I now live in Israel, where the Europeans are too busy not being butt hurt to argue with me about why they should be able to claim superioritaah.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 9:39 am Syd Barrett

        Check this out, it seems you “tolerant” Israeli’s aren’t so tolerant after all. By the way, Jews consider themselves to be a separate race, they’re not white nor European.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 2:13 pm Nicole

        Israelis are definitely not generally tolerant. They’re just also generally not as pathetic. This is why even though I do encounter the odd bit of racism here, because it comes from dudes who are man enough to do their own dirty work and not just cry (until after I kick their ass), I like it better here in some ways.

        The few who do bother about such things don’t just whine. They knuckle up. That’s how I like my racism: with balls and not with bawling. Then I know where I stand, and it’s also an indication that the wealthy haven’t yet reached a point of decadence that they have an interest in over domestication.

        I’m sure they will, just not yet.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 7:01 pm Syd Barrett

        So you want the US to return to the days open segregation 50’s style ?? . Actually I agree with you, all races should be allowed to air their views publicly and without prejudice, it might solve a lot of problems. However, its really difficult when, anytime a white man speaks an honest opinion, he gets assaulted with the racist label. Not all of us are supremacists, some of us just don’t subscribe to the falls utopia of multiculturalism.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2013 at 5:06 pm Nicole

        Syd, I believe in freedom of association and from association. The problem is that in order to have a system that would facilitate, Americans would have to be completely re educated, and I don’t see that happening…at least not yet.

        The internet has provided a platform for many to learn the truth about history, but it is also overpopulated with crackpots. If figuring out the truth about history, genetics, and social science is as hard as it was for me to find out the truth about nutrition, then the average person has little hope on their own.

        This is why, like me, you might have to take a chance of being viewed as crazy and racist, and just speak your mind whenever it is reasonably safe to.

        Sometimes you may have to even do it when it’s not exactly safe. Sun Tzu comes in handy for these situations.

        You know what’s going on, and enough about humanity and history to understand what will happen eventually. So victory of reality is assured. You just want to make sure that victory results in a more stable and man friendly society instead of total chaos from which the society may not recover, but simply reset with different versions of the same demons.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 3:19 pm Boomerang

        This is all accusation by lefty Israelis, which is just fuel for idiots like you who don’t know the difference. lefty Israelis brought the non-Jewish backwardass Ethiopians into Israel in order to help it become unjewish. The lefties in Israel are doing everything in their power to undermined Israeli society, much like the left is doing in Europe and the US. Most of these accusations are hogwash, but it’s true most Israelis don’t like the Ethiopians and can you blame them? Why, do we like blacks in this country? Who commits most of the crime, if not the blacks? The Ethiopians had no business coming into Israel, end of subject. Now they dare open their mouth assisted by the left of course looking to undermine Israeli society.

        Regarding tolerant Israelis, yes there are such a group. They are the lefty Israelis. They are tolerant everywhere, also in the US. They really believe this equality bullshit. Conservatives are not tolerant of people from the third world. Look at Mike Savage and Mark Levine, they are not tolerant of any members of the third world coming here. Unfortunately, in Israel the conservative don’t have as much power as the liberals, much like in the rest of the west.

        The same lefties made Ms. Israel an Ethiopian. She will be competing in the Ms Universe competition representing Israel. She is really ugly, but in the interest of diversity she “beat” more beautiful Israeli girls. Israel is now participating in affirmative action for beauty queens. How absurd.

        Anyway, if Nicole was really living in Israel, or had anything to do with Israeli society, she would have known that Ms Israel is an Ethiopian, yet on a few occasions in the last week when she was challenged about Israel mistreating Ethiopians she never mentioned it. This leads me to believe she knows nothing about Israel and she doesn’t even live there, regardless of what she claims. I doubt anyone would marry her in Israel, and if she is really there then she is illegal.

        Nicole, the jig is up. Give it up already. You’re not an Israeli, no Israeli ever considered marrying a cow like you, and you’re full of shit. I can’t believe anyone even engages in a conversation with you regarding Israel. It’s a waste of time. You know nothing of the place.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2013 at 4:35 pm Nicole

        Boomerang, I see you’re late to this too. I’m not anonymous. I just don’t feel compelled to bother answering things that have been covered already, and sometimes I mess with people just because it’s fun.

        Google is your friend. Use it, and you’ll have better, relevant things to insult me about.

        Titi won because she’s an amazon, not because Israelis are tolerant. Feminists and fetishists made her victory, and for that I think it is justified. Who wants to look at the same plastic surgeon’s work every day?

        LikeLike


  36. on March 31, 2013 at 1:22 pm Shawn

    Get to know this gentleman.

    LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2013 at 4:11 am aleister

      I like Tommy. Used to watch him regulary. Finally, a sane black man.

      LikeLike


  37. on March 31, 2013 at 1:41 pm jdgalt

    The problem is racism mislabeled and sold as anti-racism. Ever since forced desegregation began, it has been the policy of every public school in the US never to hold a black kid accountable for mistreating a white one — because in their eyes it’s only “racism” if a white kid does it.

    So long as the authorities practice this real racism, those black kids who feel like being monsters will get away with it — until another well deserved Columbine occurs. How many of those will it take before government starts doing its proper job again?

    LikeLike


  38. on March 31, 2013 at 1:48 pm jamestest1213

    Am I the only one who considers the possibility that it might be a social issue rather than a racial one? And before I get accused of being a PC-ist liberal let me explain: The blacks cause trouble at a disproportional rate, but they are from lower-class, violent upbringings at a disproportional rate too. This doesn’t excuse them for their actions, but it does explain the statistics. To take a complex issue like this and bring it down to just the colour of one’s skin is overly simplistic. It is not a black-and-white issue.

    [CH: A billion Chinese live in squalor compared to the average black American. Yet their crime rate is vanishingly low.]

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:02 pm Musashi

      It should be so obvious that it doesn’t require stating but, I guess it does: mere skin color does not determine anything. So-called “negro culture” is another matter. Blacks seem to be incompatible in every way with White culture.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:12 pm Nicole

        Africans do just fine in European cultures that are not full of fail and fop.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:57 pm whorefinder

        lol! A complete and utter lie!

        Blacks in Europe STILL are committing the most crimes per capita and committing the most social dysfunction.

        One hilarious part is that the “Asian” immigrants flooding Europe (i.e. Muslims) are moving for immigration controls—on blacks! That’s because the Muslims, being poor, always have to live in the poorest neighborhoods when immigrating—next to blacks, who are violent, sexually perverted, and anti-social. They hate them

        Or maybe warpig’s recious Israel–who recently deprova’ed a bunch of darky jews for the same reason.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:12 am whiskeysplace

        No they don’t — the London Riots were Blacks burning down half of London. Whites riotiing would have been met by gunfire. Blacks caused dithering for days predictably (Crown Heights, Watts, Rodney King). That’s why Whites want assault rifles, to protect them and the little they own from Blacks burning it all down.

        Black people are universal failures: failures everywhere, every time, every place. Math, science, technology are open to anyone: Sony/Japan, Samsung/Korea. Wall Street and Silicon Valley hire people with ultra dark skin (but from India) who are ultra smart. I’ll grant you Blacks are great for dunking basketballs, running with footballs, throwing them, catching them, rapping, thugging it up, etc. But that’s it. No Black guy has even created a cool Android/IOS app. Those development tools are free.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:49 am Nicole

        So you figure Anglo culture, running a close second in the boorish feminist bar hopping slutfest to the U.S. is not full of fail and fop?

        Go east, young man.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 8:50 am Robert

        Sorry to say your first para is inaccurate (I’m a brit). The riots were intermittent looting sprees which involved youth from black, white mixed race and asian groups. The police decision to go for containment rather that confrontation was a combination of political point-scoring (budget cuts meant the police could claim personnel were not available) and prior experience of riots tending to exhaust themselves in the absence of fresh grievances (which shootings would create).

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 7:33 am blarf1

        “full of fail and fop”
        If you think that Anglo/scandinavian culture is full of fail when they have been driving technological progress for almost 200 years and are also some of the safest and cleanest around, I’d say you are delusional.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 11:18 am Nicole

        Are you feeling the progress when a White woman is sucking a Black man’s penis and recording it on her iPhone?

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:49 pm Syd Barrett

        Non sequitur Nicole, non sequitur ……

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:50 pm LOL

        Yes, it is far better than living anywhere in Africa.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 7:07 pm Nicole

        I’m just saying, Syd, you have technology and world famous slags who want to turn the rest of us into slags and make socioeconomic class the new beauty.

        It’s like…indoor toilet and a wife who is shagging the whole neighborhood and an outhouse and a faithful wife.

        Now you have iPods and too many 30 year old dudes who haven’t seen a vagina in 3d since they passed through one at birth. That’s progress?

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 1:32 pm Customer Service

        Stop repeating something that isn’t true.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 4:14 am aleister

        Hahaha, we hate them with a fucking passion. You don’t know what you’re talking about. eastern Europe HATES, I repeat HATES blacks and gypsies.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 5:13 am Nicole

        Hate or not hate isn’t the point. The point is that Africans who go to eastern Europe do pretty well, and rarely have many of the problems typical African Americans. When over the top racially motivated incidents do happen, it’s considered shocking and embarrassing.

        Somehow, eastern Europeans manage to hate people without deciding that it’s open season…and I’m pretty sure they hate Jews and Gypsies worse than Africans.

        I’m told that during the Soviet era, there was more trouble with Africans because they were there mostly because of the education and training programs. Now, part of the trouble with them is that most are mixed and mistaken for Arab, but this is often cleared up in a short conversation. Overall, so long as one doesn’t act a fool, one is okay.

        At least, this is what I’m told.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 8:59 am Dan Fletcher

      “Am I the only one who considers the possibility that it might be a social issue rather than a racial one?”

      The problem with that argument is that it seems that every majority black community suffers from stereotypical black dysfunction on some level. Like clockwork, areas that were once orderly and prosperous come to resemble 3rd world villages when blacks swell to majority numbers. It is like this everywhere, not just America. The “social” argument runs thin in the face of these facts.

      Wish this shit wasn’t true, but it is.

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 7:14 am thwack

        Am I the only one who considers the possibility that it might be a social issue rather than a racial one?”
        ——————————————————————————–
        No, Ive thought of that too. Made a funny about it; like to hear it? Here it go: “what do you call a black man who is raised like and treated like a white person?

        “Mr. President”

        LikeLike


  39. on March 31, 2013 at 1:56 pm kubla

    I’m a white educated guy, who makes a decent living, am sociable, and a pretty good looking guy. I’m fairly charismatic, people generally like me both when initially meeting me, and once they get to know me. There is one exception however. Women like the ones pictured in this post (the Childress sisters). I’ve encountered women like them in the business world, who are above me in the corporate hierarchy. And they hate me. They paint a target on my back, and hate me viscerally. In most cases, they are unusually tall for women (6 ft or taller), overweight, and homely. Usually lesbian or closeted lesbians. Whereas most people treat me with respect, they are dismissive and mocking of me in meetings and so forth. One was way above be in the corporate hierarchy, and went out of her way to damage my career. Why would she even give two shits about me? After seeing this pattern, it finally dawned on me. Ugly women hate attractive, fit, educated white guys. They have a great deal of bitterness towards us. They are envious of our status in the world. They are bitter that they’ve been ignored their whole life from people like me. Once they get into a position of power over someone like me, its pay back time. I WILL notice them!! I will learn what its like to be excrement. Anyway, checkout the Childress web site. Its all about how white men are at the top of life’s hierarchy, and we need to be knocked down. It’s envy, it’s spite,it’s falling on their knees and damning God for creating this world that is so unfair to ugly broads.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 2:35 pm thwack

      Keep you head up Kubla, I know its rough out there. Personally, Im not ready for the white man to be taken down. Why?

      Cause then I would be exposed for the charlatan and trickster that I really am. I need the white man to stay front and center, as the symbol of all that is evil and oppressive… the global divine object of hatred… thanks for taking one for the team.

      WHITE POWER!!!

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 3:57 pm driveallnight

        Whites got T.S Eliot. Blacks get T.H. Wack.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:07 pm PA

        LOL

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 11:34 pm WhoCares

        LMAO. Touche sir, touche. I ain’t anti black, but being race objective is a rare point.among my black brothers.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 4:20 am tang3zang

        Actually very accurate.

        When I read the Everybody vs White Males social justice spiel, and I say to myself, “A lot of this shit applies to Asian dudes too, if not more. Thank God whitey is there to act as everyone’s punching bag.”

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 4:01 pm ttaz4dqm

      kubla – that reads like something I could have posted myself. I have been running afoul of women like you describe ever since I entered the workforce. Not at every job I’ve ever had but enough to be noticeable, and whenever one of them notices me, it’s never good, lol. When it happens, I think shit, not again, here’s one that’s going to try to get back at me for something I never did to them, their resentment stemming from some anger over the fact that they know I’m never going to try to fuck them, or something? Really irrational hamster-wheel shit. Good to know I’m not the only one whose ever experienced it!

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:55 pm kubla

        Yeah, be careful with those “Alice the Goon” types in the corporate world. They were hit by the ugly stick since birth, and are largely unlovable and ignored in life, and they have a bitter axe to grind with guys, especially guys who have any sex appeal. They only way they get any attention in life is through achievement in the workplace, and they work hard at it. Years ago they would have been excluded in the corporate world too for being too ugly, but with affirmative action, they are allowed in.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 4:55 pm gt2

      I have noticed a similar phenomena to you. I’m a tall, athletic, good looking white guy. Attractive women in there early
      20s are very nice to me, all smiles, never rude. Older, fat, unattractive women though just seem to have a problem with me.
      There rude, difficult, combative and unhelpful to me. If they have some shred of power over me, they seem to relish giving me a hard
      time. I notice they tend to be quite nice to other similar women to themselves so I assume something about me just doesn’t jive well with them.

      LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 7:00 pm gramps

      Would it be possible for a guy in your position to game a gal like that? For example, maybe you project an aloofness that she interprets as scorn or contempt for her (Hell no fury, etc.) Maybe you smile and engage younger, prettier women in conversation and bring back many painful memories of her youth when men such as yourself rejected, or worse, ignored her. What if you tried to engage her in pleasant and causal conversation?

      Remember that no woman starts out in life hoping to be ugly, rejected, and bitter, just like no man starts out in life hoping to have a bad comb over. Imagine if you were a 45 year old guy, moderately but not hugely successful in business but never successful with women, and you are exposed to a younger woman at work, and who smiles and flirts with the younger, handsome men at work, while studiously avoiding you? You wouldn’t like it one bit. Now, a man might not take it personally, but, a woman? They are irrational, amoral, and merciless.

      So, maybe you could soften her up a bit towards you just with a little light and friendly conversation. That might be all she needs. If she misinterpreted your friendliness, well, you’re on your own at that point.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:18 pm Polymath

        Gramps,
        Kubla and the others are right and you are wrong. I’ve experienced the same thing myself even though I am always friendly and cordial to these women. It doesn’t matter. They attempt to destroy the careers of men who remind them that men their age have options which they don’t anymore; but their worst viciousness and backstabbing is aimed at attractive young women. They attempt to bring down men like me, but we have enough experience and value to the company that we can usually defend against them; the attractive young women get destroyed. Any time one of those harridans observes an attractive young woman and an attractive older man interacting with each other in such a way that it is clear they enjoy each others’ acquaintance, she starts sharpening her weapons.

        LikeLike


  40. on March 31, 2013 at 2:44 pm PA

    old spinsters who hate white men because they were once sexually rejected by a white

    This.

    LikeLike


  41. on March 31, 2013 at 2:47 pm PA

    A Short Study of Leadership by Race

    Black Alpha: the biggest, dumbest, loudest male who out-shouts and out-rhymes everyone else. Example: liberated black Haitians slaughtering their new mulatto ruling class.

    White Alpha: a smart, charming athlete. Example: the British Empire.

    Yellow Alpha: the most inbred son of the wealthiest mandarin. Example: Imperial China.

    There is a lesson there.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 3:18 pm Pole

      Sounds like warhammer 40k empires.
      Black Alphas: orks.
      White Alpha: space marines
      Yellow alpha: Imperial guard

      LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 10:38 am goodspeed

      I think Yellow Alpha is wrong, its more like:

      Intelligent, pragmatic and a long-term thinker who does what he thinks is best for his nation…. after he has cheated and stolen as much as he can for himself and his family. Example: China today.

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 1:34 pm Customer Service

        Whites build, blacks destroy, Asians maintain.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2013 at 6:34 pm goodspeed

        Not really, China was far ahead of Europe for most of history and will soon be so again.

        LikeLike


  42. on March 31, 2013 at 3:06 pm DatBro

    A black person kills an infant.

    Heartiste blames the entire black race.

    A white person shoots up an elementary school.

    Heartiste blames single momhood

    Stay classy, Heartiste.

    brb this comment gets deleted

    [CH: The only way disingenuous numbnuts like yourself can “win” internet debate points is by putting words in your opponents’ mouths. So, let’s say it together:

    I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE.]

    LikeLike


  43. on March 31, 2013 at 3:10 pm Anonymous

    @PA you are full of shit. Your so-called study of race is exposing your inferiority complex, it also shows that in reality you are in fact BETA.

    LikeLike


  44. on March 31, 2013 at 3:12 pm PA

    Childress.

    Change one letter in that name and that is what they really are.

    Poor parents of those two old spinsters. When their parents got pregnant with twin girls, at some level they rejoiced “at least four grandchildren soon!” because women marry earlier and are more likely to reproduce to begin with.

    That difficult twin pregnancy in fact produced two duds.

    This is also known as heartbreak.

    LikeLike


  45. on March 31, 2013 at 3:28 pm Hiram J Goldstein II (@HiramJGoldstein)

    I’ve noticed a common complaint in “red pill” blogs is that the FBI now lumps hispanic and white homicides together in order to inflate white homicide statistics (probably to help build the leftoids’ case for gun control). Fortunately, the CDC still doesn’t. I found this report—the non-hispanic white homicide rate in 2007 was just 2.7, right in line with a typical European country.

    http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6001a14.htm

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 8:41 am Dan Fletcher

      Good find.

      Also note that white students do as well in school as their counterparts in European countries. It is only when you factor in minorities (which those Euro countries often lack in great numbers) that our school system looks so atrocious.

      LikeLike


  46. on March 31, 2013 at 3:30 pm Black Men Have Much To Discuss About Murderous Crime « PUA Central

    […] Black Men Have Much To Discuss About Murderous Crime […]

    LikeLike


  47. on March 31, 2013 at 3:55 pm kubla

    I found some nuggets o’ wisdom on the Childless gals’ web site:

    “In hierarchies, we take diversity, then judgment is applied.
    We choose some traits we name as best, the rest are cast aside.
    There are many natural body types, and many different features,
    It is time to include everyone when looking for sexy creatures.”

    “What? We women already know about men’s definition of sexuality; we are constantly pressured to change ourselves to fit that narrow view if we want them to see us as attractive,” Bonnie replies.

    You see, gals like the Childless sisters are only frumpy and ugly if you buy into society’s hierarchal constructs…blah blah…and with a little re-education, you will see their true beauty, and will want to have these beauts bent of your couch while you do them doggy.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 7:02 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      Great find!

      Now if only we could re-educate boys, they’d have posters of these sisters on their walls, not Carmen Elektra.

      LikeLike


  48. on March 31, 2013 at 3:58 pm Greatest Beta

    Almost surreal seeing this shit get published. Question is does it get worse or does the tide slowly begin to turn? Currently it appears that we are a tiny minority that congregates on the web. Speak to people from all walks of life and the supremacist feminist meme dominates.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 4:12 pm ttaz4dqm

      Those who speak Truth to Bullshit are usually a tiny minority, especially on the innertoobz, where gender-feminism and PC-ism are all da rage…

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 4:32 pm Greatest Beta

        If history is any guide, what’s likely to happen is the state and feminism grow more powerful until the system implodes. Perhaps a moral and strong remnant can live amongst the ruins of a collapsed empire?

        On the other hand, it’s possible that sovereign insolvency and defaults spread throughout the western world, bringing hardship which reintroduces moral society based on necessity.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:08 pm Nicole

        Humans in general are only moral when it is necessary to be so. Do you think that if a certain person here could get away with it, he would not execute every Black man, woman, and child he encountered? He doesn’t because he fears death or loss of privilege. Yet he claims to be more civilized.

        When people say they want more civilization, what they’re usually saying is that they want more assurances and guarantees in life.

        So in my opinion, it is better for men to find a balance. Understand human nature is to exploit as much as they can, and gain as much as they can for as little effort as they can spend, and bear this in mind when thinking of creating a society or fostering any movement.

        Everyone is an idealist when they are being pressed. They lose that when they’re not. Those who are what they are regardless of the circumstances, and have values that aren’t dependent on what’s most convenient at the moment are rare in any population.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:03 pm whorefinder

        Do you think that if a certain person here could get away with it, he would not execute every Black man, woman, and child he encountered? He doesn’t because he fears death or loss of privilege. Yet he claims to be more civilized.
        —Subhumans do not get human rights, child. You’ve proven incapable of running a civilization even on the local level, and are a parasitic organism holding the human race back.

        Civilized behavior entails removing uncivilized behavior…like black people.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:44 am Nicole

        Fine. Go for it. At least then I can respect you. You’d be a warrior instead of a crybaby.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:47 am whorefinder

        lol. Yep, according to warpig, noticing and noting that her people are violent savages unworthy of life is now “being a crybaby.”

        But executing people in stealth is being a “warrior.” So all those Negroes who shoot babies in the face and attack neighborhood watch activists and attack tourists on a Saturday night for no reason—they’re “warriors.”

        You couldn’t make this fat lump up. lol.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:22 pm Nicole

        Saying that we’re violent savages, I have no problem with. If I may use myself as an example, I can wholeheartedly agree. If someone attacks me, I will use whatever force necessary to stop them, and if they die, I would probably not feel any remorse for that. I do not feel any remorse or regret for any injuries I have caused in any of the fights that I have been in.

        …and I’m a nice girl whose parents started in the ghetto, but eventually became yuppies. I own a business, and am doing pretty well for myself, but I will cut or shoot you if you try to harm me or my loved ones.

        Deciding that we are unworthy to live because we are better at violence though…well, you are welcome to think that, and if you are capable of snuffing us out, then well, that’s Nature. Survival of the fittest, I supposed.

        …but to incessantly whine about it day and night online is the pussy way. So long as you’re whining and not doing the work, but wanting people to treat you as if you are butch enough to do the work, I am going to be calling you a pussy when I wish to bother, and thinking that when I don’t.

        Thing is, the savagery required to kill women and children because they may breed or grow up to be enemies takes a strong stomach, and would preclude you calling yourself “civilized” and non savage. You would need to become not a warrior like me, but a savage who kills babies, to do it. You would become that 14 year old punk who shot that baby.

        Then you would need to spend many years trying to justify that while calling yourself “civilized”.

        You’d better be really sure, whore, that you think Black people are subhuman, before you put a bullet in a baby’s skull.

        Really sure.

        LikeLike


  49. on March 31, 2013 at 4:13 pm anononono

    Totally unrelated: Even without the accompanying picture, you can assume that there aren’t even 500 white teenagers in most american cities since whiteys stopped having kids.

    http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/03/30/breaking-chicago-police-swarm-mag-mile-wilding-scene/

    “You had a group of teens, close to maybe 500. They assaulted a Chicago police officer that was mounted on a horse and all of a sudden they assaulted a citizen walking the streets, just a normal citizen shopping and enjoying the weather,” said Holmes.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 4:18 pm anononono

      just realized, these people who were assaulted are hate-victims…the fact that they reported the attacks they received is hateful

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:11 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        Excellent point. I’ll have to remember this.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 8:36 am Dan Fletcher

      Jesus. Real life zerg rush….

      LikeLike


  50. on March 31, 2013 at 4:31 pm PA

    I would rather be justfying men being men than men being pussies. You want the meek to inherit the Earth. This is just not how it works.

    Nicole, you persist with what I call your Barnyard Vitalism. That’s a path that leads to the slaughterhouse, no matter how badass the hog.

    The Amish are pretty meek. No guns, no fighting. Would you call them pussies?

    I go to an Amish market regularly and I make transactionw with ten-year-old Amish boys. They will look you dead in the eye like an adult man and speak to you with a firm voice.

    The Amish don’t fight because they know that idiotic posturing would get whatever government they had lived under for the past four centuries to eradicate them; either with guns or with section 8 apartments, mandatory public schools, and racial integration in their communities. Therefore my belief is that the Amish are smart and they are serious about the business of survival. They don’t puff out their chests like chimps, they do not start unprovoked trouble, and most importantly, they DO NOT AMASS a colossal debit of ill will with all the people around them whom they have pissed off. Like blacks do.

    You probably read about two black teenagers in Georgia shooting a white baby in the face and killing him in front of his mother last week. And then, a black city commissioner got caught trying to cover up for the perps. I guess no belligerent party here was a pussy… except for the debits they added to the account book that is not going away.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 7:59 pm Nicole

      Shooting a baby is the most pussy thing a person can do with a gun.

      You’re accusing me of barnyard vitalism, but it’s closer to Asatru survivalism. Belief that violence is a useful tool does not mean the same thing as believing that people should let themselves be killed and praise the killers.

      Whole thing would have gone down very different if the mother was a realist and packing.

      LikeLike


  51. on March 31, 2013 at 4:33 pm Exurban

    So I check that article out and learn that those two slags are from Portland, Oregon.

    Of course.

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 12:40 am Anonymous

      Oops, actually right now it’s Eugene, Oregon. But then that’s even more Portland than Portland.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 8:48 pm kubla

        http://eugene.areaconnect.com/statistics.htm

        Eugene Oregon:

        Race
        White 121546 88.15%
        Black or African American 1729 1.25%

        LikeLike


  52. on March 31, 2013 at 5:18 pm Greatest Beta

    Fat acceptance Movement blogger
    http://www.nearsightedowl.com/2013/03/vain-and-fat.html?m=1

    She’s been posting pics of her “family” cats and dogs lolz

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 5:23 pm ttaz4dqm

      Ouch, nasty! Now I can’t unsee that fat, pasty tableau of awfulness. Whew.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:47 pm Greatest Beta

        OMG

        http://www.nearsightedowl.com/2013/01/in-which-someone-says-it-better.html

        “I don’t support weight loss. Period. That does not mean that I don’t believe people have the autonomy to do what they wish with their body. What people choose to do with their own body is up to them, but expecting me to support their weight loss ignores my own right to not be surrounded by that kind of mentality and the reality that most societies support weight loss as a realistic goal.

        I also reject the idea that “health” is connected to weight in the manner that we are fed in our society. I reject “health” as an identity and a space that people can take up. I reject it because health isn’t accessible to most people, it isn’t a body type and it shouldn’t be held as a morally superior status, especially when the idea that a person is “healthy” ignores that people get sick for numerous reasons even if they fit into the idea of what we think a healthy person looks / acts like.

        What we think of when we discuss health is a for profit health model that pretends health isn’t multidimensional with numerous contributing factors. While food and exercise can be vital to metabolic health (though not something people are obligated to partake in) someone’s socioeconomic status, genetics, access to fresh foods / vegetables, places to move their body, stress level, preventive medicine etc have just as much to do with their wellbeing as the things we normally associated with good health.

        Basically, I don’t support weight loss or the way we view health in our society because they are oppressive and do more harm than good.

        **Edit: It should also be noted that a person who accepts weight loss as a viable option doesn’t actually accept all bodies. They still support the notion that thin bodies are inherently better than fat bodies. I accept all bodies because I don’t support oppressive beliefs about what is a good body or bad body. Each individual should have the right to live in their body how they please.”
        – fatbodypolitics

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 5:54 pm ttaz4dqm

        Well, SHE may be a tubbagoo, but her hamster is one of the fittest I’ve ever witnessed!

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 7:03 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      Thanks for the link to the pics. I’d eaten too much at Easter and needed to puke.

      LikeLike


  53. on March 31, 2013 at 5:44 pm Exeter

    For what its worth, heartiste, I really dig these non-Game-related posts. Reminds me that there are bigger problems out there than trying to throw your dick into some whore.

    LikeLike


  54. on March 31, 2013 at 6:24 pm stankful (@palmolive604)

    I love how whites love to throw out the term “disproportionate”…Because whites commit the most crime in America but whites are least likely to be punished.The majority of Black men in jail are for NON VIOLENT DRUG offenses.But statistics across the board prove that whites use and sell drugs exceedingly more than blacks.But whites don’t get the same sentences.So please lets not pretend that white priviledge does not exist

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 8:05 pm driveallnight

      Drugs, huh? Hmmm. You want to talk about “disproportionate”?

      African-Americans commit homicide at seven times the rate of whites. African-Americans comprise better than 40% of those incarcerated for violent crimes, despite the fact that they make up only 13% of the US population.

      Don’t like the numbers? Take it up with the FBI’s crime statisticians.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:55 pm Nicole

        Again, running under the skirt of the establishment.

        Nobody here is arguing against the fact that Africans, statistically, tend to be more violent. What we’re saying is that statistics can only tell you who gets caught and what gets recorded, not what’s happening that people don’t get caught for or that doesn’t get recorded.

        Personal observation can tell you that on average, Africans tend to be more dominant/masculine and Anglos tend to be more passive/feminine. This however, does not mean that Africans are incapable of being kind or that Anglos are incapable of violence.

        So when people take the statistics and say that Africans are disproportionately violent, what they’re leaving out is that Anglos are disproportionately passive. There is the assumption that being passive is better than being violent, and that Africans’ failure to be passive means something wrong with them.

        It wouldn’t occur to most people to consider that Anglos’ failure to be as violent means that something is wrong with them.

        Since none of the statistics are about pathological passivity, you don’t know how many Anglos are suffering from it. Self destructive passivity isn’t pathologised the way that violence is, so the FBI isn’t interested. Your being passive is a good thing as far as they are concerned.

        Also, even though I don’t believe in White privilege, the illusion of it is strong enough that you are more likely to get off with warnings and lighter sentences. The reason why is not because you’re privileged but because you’re so passive that they figure that their wagging a finger will be enough to paralyze you with fear of ever getting into trouble again. So even though they don’t bother to do statistics on it, the authorities are sure that you are just docile little herdbeasts.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 9:27 am Slaughter

        Dominant? Bitch please. Your people are famed for being enslaved and living in squalor. Your tough-guy act is a recent development (beginning in roughly 1968) dependant on the leftist White man. How long do you think we will tolerate this? You act as if what is can never be altered.

        Fitting you live in Israel, a country incapable of existing were it not for W.

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:14 pm Musashi

      Oh it exists. White people like other White people a lot more than they like blacks. Buckle up, it’s about to get a lot worse too….for them.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:32 am corvinus

        White people like other White people a lot more than they like blacks.

        Unless they’re SWPLs, in which case they like other SWPLs and nonwhites and hate other whites.

        LikeLike


  55. on March 31, 2013 at 6:42 pm gramps

    Black violence, mainly in urban areas in America, can be explained by simple Darwinian logic.

    Blacks have less money than whites (or anybody else for that matter.) Blacks live in areas that are really very desirable. If not for the violence, non-blacks would move in, run up real estate prices, and the blacks would have to leave.

    The only way blacks can stay in urban settings is to:
    1. Trash them into slums.
    2. Attack, rob, and rape people with money who try to move into these areas.

    Now, I am not suggesting that these behaviors are planned. No, they are simply Darwinian adaptations. Blacks have evolved behavior and genetic traits that allow them to remain in urban areas. No thinking involved.

    It is much like the Jews. Jews, living as a dispersed minority for many generations, could only have survived as a group by evolving artificial differences between them and the natives in their host country. Differences in food, dress, holidays etc. serve only to create artificial boundaries. I wish I could say I thought this up, but, I read this in Gibbons History of Rome. The ancient Roman writers had this all figured out.

    There is nothing new. Just stuff we have forgotten.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:16 pm Musashi

      Why is Africa a festering shithole?
      Why does every city in America that has a substantial black population resemble an African festering shithole?

      LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2013 at 1:44 pm Customer Service

      Uh, no. Jewish ghettos were never known for their violence. Jews were known for their usury (money lending)… By no fair comparison are the blacks of today the Jews of yester’yore. For one, black discrimination is frowned upon whereas Jewish discrimination is constant in almost every generation and secondly Blacks are shitting the bed despite being given every opportunity to succeed. Jews succeeded despite being given every opportunity to fail. Blacks are the opposite of Jews.

      LikeLike


  56. on March 31, 2013 at 6:44 pm Wrecked 'Em

    John Wayne put it best when he said that he was very proud of the fact that Blacks had done better here in America than anywhere else in the world.

    A gentleman AND a diplomat he was.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 7:07 pm Nicole

      He was also wrong. He could sell that line to ignorant people who think that conversion to Christianity was an improvement over being a king or president someplace non Christian.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 8:02 pm Exeter

        I was going to make a comment about how retarded this statement was..then I saw the female handle and said why bother.

        Who keeps entertaining these hamsters and encouraging them to continue posting here?

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:59 pm whorefinder

        Warpig is a feast of ugly, fat, black feminine failed relationship stupidity all unto herself.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:00 pm Nicole

        Okay, Mr. Brains, tell us how much better off Shaquafanian Whatevertang on the corner in Chicago is than the King of the Dahomey.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:00 pm whorefinder

        lol. Oh yes, the nig gers in loin cloths who think raping babies saves you from AIDS are so much better off!

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:52 am Nicole

        Those people are ignorant and uneducated. What’s your excuse?

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:57 am whorefinder

        lol. What’s my excuse that I’m NOT raping babies to save people from AIDS?

        That I’m not black!

        QED, warpig.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:26 pm Nicole

        You are okay with killing babies. Why should I think you’d be against raping them too. Some White guys rape babies. So by your logic that since some Black people are murderers and “savages”, I’m the same as them, then since some White people love to go to Africa as missionaries and rape kids, you must be like that too. See how that works?

        But of course when you kill or rape babies, you’re just ridding the world of subhuman scum, right?

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:19 pm Musashi

        That’s funny considering we have a nominally black president who thinks himself a king in a formerly Christian nation.
        Very funny indeed.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 10:36 pm Nicole

        And yet he is up in church worshiping the magical Jew.

        LikeLike


  57. on March 31, 2013 at 6:46 pm Gracian

    So, I’ve been coming to this site for over a year now and never posted a comment. I like the site and check it more often that I would like to admit. But, I felt compelled to finally write a comment today. And yes, my comment below might ruffle some feathers, but it will not bother the well-meaning and thoughtful crowd.

    1. The game advice for ‘attracting and securing modern American females’ is quite good.

    2. CH is a very skilled writer and seemingly of high intelligence, which is why I make the points below.

    3. The degree of overt and covert racism on this site, almost exclusively directed towards Black Males is disgusting, yet intriguing — from a psychological standpoint. Black Males are repeatedly introduced into the essays and comments, when their presence in these essays and comments, or even as a topic of conversation AT ALL on this site, is extremely bizarre.

    4. The repeated examples of #3 on this site — and the sycophantic clapping and cheering by ‘many in the CH audience’ — seems to reflect an inferiority complex and/or ‘obsession bordering on fetishism’.

    5. The crimes referred to in the article above reflect the same crime that you will find in MOST poor communities across the world (e.g. Brazil, Columbia, El Salvador, etc.).

    FACT: Poor males pursue power, money, and status with violence if necessary, essentially to secure sexual access to females. Throw into that toxic mix broken homes, single-motherhood, despair, rage, and access to weapons, against the backdrop of a modern society that CLEARLY rewards winners (e.g. Wall Street mega-criminal banker) and scorns losers (e.g. unfortunate college-educated Walmart cashier) and you will have young, hungry, and aggressive males who have nothing to lose and everything to gain. So, nothing new here.

    6. When the ‘US academic and media establishments’ start conducting detailed studies, analyses, townhall meetings, and CNN/FOX discussion panels of why essentially all MASS MURDER SHOOTINGS are done by young middle-class white American males, then articles like the one mentioned above might be taken more seriously by non-biased social observers. Theoretically, given the present socio-economic picture, shouldn’t it be disgruntled and displaced Black/Latino males who should be “shooting up the place”?!?!

    I have worked and played alongside many quality Black, White, Latino, and Asian males. Conversely, I know a few Black, White, Latino, and Asian assholes and morons. Racism and race-baiting is misguided, reckless, and destroys the soul — individually and collectively.

    Anyways, I will keep coming to the site for #1 and related topics (unless I get banned by CH).

    Please ignore all typos/grammatical errors.

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 8:28 pm gramps

      Gracian,

      Have you experienced first hand what happens when blacks move into a neighborhood and a school or school system? Once you do, or do it twice (It always starts the same and always ends the same), then you will begin to understand why many white people just don’t want to be around black people.

      It isn’t all the blacks fault. We have a Federal govt, for example, which forbids schools from disciplining “too many” black kids in schools. That is right. They kept track in Washington D.C. of the racial classification of kids punished for bad school behavior in every public school in the country. As a result, a black kid, for example, dances on the desk in a local H.S. math class, and suffers not the slightest disciplinary action. Nobody makes him stop dancing, either. He openly cheats on tests in Latin class, right in front of the teacher.

      A friend’s son was robbed at gunpoint in Philly several years ago (the gun was shoved into his mouth). The black jury convicted the perp, but the black female judge gave him probation because “there are too many young black men in jail.”

      Do you see a pattern here?

      The vast majority of interracial violence (black-white), and ALL of the rape, involves black perps and white victims. Given their very high level of violence and, let’s face it, sheer stupidity, which helps to explain the latter, avoiding black people is rational. You never know what will set one off. You never know when that sucker punch is coming.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:43 pm Gracian

        Ever been to rural Appalachia (USA)? It is an ugly scene with poor White people living desperate lives full of violence, mental illness, rage, hunger, and lack of familial/social structure.

        Poor Whites are typically clustered in rural areas.

        Poor Blacks are often clustered in urban areas (Reason: meat-packing, automotive, manufacturing jobs shut down in late 1960s/early 1970s).

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:52 pm whorefinder

        lol. Comparing the “evil racist whiteys in trailers” to the dominance of black dysfunction and crime in this country is comparing a person throwing an empty coke can on the street versus a full garbage truck dumping it’s contents in the middle of downtown during rush hour.

        False comparisons won’t work, whitey hater.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 1:02 am Anonymous

        Your facts are wrong. Black serial killers occur in the American population at at least the same rate as white serial killers. Peruse this list:

        African-American Serial Killers

        Next, black males commit an absolute majority of the murders in the USA, and it is they who give the United States a murder rate of 4.8 per 100,000 inhabitants, higher than most other developed countries.

        There may well be some stone killers in England and Scotland, but Britain has a murder rate of 1.2 per 100,000.

        List of countries by intentional homicide rate

        You poverty-causes-crime argument was already tired when it appeared in West Side Story. It’s completely exhausted now.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 1:56 am lorem ipsum

        Statistically speaking, mass shootings barely qualify as a rounding error when considered against the totality of violent crime in a nation of 320 million people.. Frankly they receive far too much attention as-is.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 11:25 am Gracian

        Agreed. 100%

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 8:27 am Liberal Myth Smasher

        “Ever been to rural Appalachia (USA)? It is an ugly scene with poor White people living desperate lives full of violence, mental illness, rage, hunger, and lack of familial/social structure.”

        And let’s not forget all of those dirt poor white people from centuries ago who came to the United States (or the American colonies, depending on the year) with little more than lent in their pockets.

        Early Americans were very poor by today’s standards. In fact, the standard of living is probably better in inner city black areas than America in the 1600s or 1700s for the ordinary person.

        Since early Americans were so poor, chaos, crime and violence were ubiquitous. They were killing each other constantly. Babies were spawned out of wedlock at a rate of 90%. There was mental illness, rage, hunger and a lack of familial and social structure.

        Oh, wait. Wait a minute…

        None of that is true!

        Early Americans were very hard working despite their poverty (obviously they didn’t use welfare). There was virtually no violence and crime, nor was there an illegitimate birth rate epidemic and lack of family structure (they were religious and didn’t tolerate it). Despite early American’s poverty, they don’t share the profile of poor blacks in the US today.

        But I guess this didn’t cross your mind, did it?

        Look, buddy. Correlation doesn’t equal causation. Blaming poverty on black dysfunction is like an escape route.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:05 am Rogue Male

        “Blaming poverty on black dysfunction is like an escape route.”

        Especially when it’s the dysfunction that accounts for the persistent poverty, not vice versa. See Deetroit, Chicongo, lather, rinse, repeat.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:54 am Gracian

        Lol. Ok buddy. Whatever you say.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:06 am Dan Fletcher

        Exactly. Poverty is an intrinsic characteristic of these societies

        Dirt poor Vietnamese came here with nothing and were able to boot-strap themselves in a few generations.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 7:28 am thwack

        Dan Fletcher
        Dirt poor Vietnamese came here with nothing and were able to boot-strap themselves in a few generations.
        ——————————————————————————–
        Wrong, the ones that got here were the house nkeegers, uncle toms, happy slaves, TWINKIES (yellow on the outside, white on the inside)… who were helping the white man maintain white supremacy in Vietnam. White guilt play a huge role.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:10 am Dan Fletcher

        “Ever been to rural Appalachia (USA)? It is an ugly scene with poor White people living desperate lives full of violence, mental illness, rage, hunger, and lack of familial/social structure.”

        Lol. Okay, post the crime stats. Those places are utopias compared to the dysfunction of Detroit, etc…

        The “violent redneck trailer park”, while not without dysfunction, is more of a liberal blank-slate fantasy than reality.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 8:21 pm gramps

        I used to live in West Virginia, next to a car junkyard.

        The people were fine. Not a single problem in the four years I lived there. My wife and kids were home alone all day everyday and I never had a single moment of worry about them. I didn’t own a gun. My son in law owns a gun in case some of his brown neighbors (and fellow Obama voters) break into his house. He lives outside D.C.

        In Baltimore yesterday we had three shootings, one fatal. Chicago had 22 shootings over the weekend, I think only one fatal.

        Did you hear Nutter making a fool of himself talking about thousands of gun murders per day in this country? Only to say latter hundreds of murders? Then, the final ans, 30 per day. Now, is he a total fool, just another black jerk who can’t do math and thinks in, and knows nothing, but slogans? Or, was he simply extrapolating from his experience as an urban black. If you lived in an urban black area, you might truly believe there are thousands of murders per day. Who knows why he said anything so stupid? Who cares? Just avoid these people.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 7:33 am thwack

        gramps
        I used to live in West Virginia, next to a car junkyard.

        The people were fine. Not a single problem in the four years I lived there.
        —————————————————————————–
        The density is too low for kneegar type pathology. Put me in charge and I could have them killing each other in two weeks.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 8:33 am Holden Caulfield

        Posted above somewhere, but warrants repeating:

        http://lagriffedulion.f2s.com/hood.htm

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:15 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        “When the ‘US academic and media establishments’ start conducting detailed studies, analyses, townhall meetings, and CNN/FOX discussion panels of why essentially all MASS MURDER SHOOTINGS are done by young middle-class white American males, then articles like the one mentioned above might be taken more seriously by non-biased social observers.”

        You mean like the Asian who shot up Virginia Tech, the two black guys called “The Snipers,” that Mexican kid who shot up his whole family, the Long Island Railroad Gunman, The Fort Hood Killer, One L. Goh, Tyrone Mitchell, etc. etc.?

        LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 9:06 pm Canadian Friend

      “… essentially all MASS MURDER SHOOTINGS are done by young middle-class white American males,… ”

      Each year in the USA victims of mass shooting represent about one thousandth of the total number of people killed.

      yes 1/1000th you read that right.

      Thousands more people are shot in situations that are NOT mass shootings

      and who does most of the killing outside of mass shootings? Black males.

      You don’t know what you are talking about.

      Mass shootings are very spectacular but statistically they are irrelevant.

      You are hundreds times more likely to be shot by a black man in the street than by a white man in a mass shooting.

      Mass shootings are rare and the total number of victims in the last 40 years is a few dozen.

      While tens of thousands of people are shot in other situations every year. Most of them shot by black males.

      I will say it again; mass shootings are very spectacular but they are statistically irrelevant.

      You have been misinformed and brainwashed.

      LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:52 pm Gracian

        Yes. Black Males will kill Black Males for the meager resources that they can get. Latino Males will kill Latino Males for the meager resources that they can get. White British Males will kill White British Males for the meager resources they can get (London’s East End white males can be stone cold killers.)

        The main point is so obvious that even a college freshmen political science or sociology major understand this fact: Male poverty + Weapons = Violence in the pursuit of resources and sex. Anywhere and everywhere.

        LikeLike


      • on March 31, 2013 at 9:57 pm whorefinder

        Black Males will kill Black Males for the meager resources that they can get
        —Or for “disrespect.” Or for when they have a bad day. Or when an air conditioner drips water on them and they have to find someone to blame.

        Animals.

        Latino Males will kill Latino Males for the meager resources that they can get. White British Males will kill White British Males for the meager resources they can get
        —-And yet both kill and mug and assault at rates far below blacks, even when adjusting for poverty.

        Your poverty argument fails!

        (London’s East End white males can be stone cold killers.)
        —Exceptions only prove the rule, dumbass.

        The main point is so obvious that even a college freshmen political science or sociology major understand this fact:
        —-lol. The statistical difference is so great between black versus non-black crime, even a high school kid can see it.

        Male poverty + Weapons = Violence
        –uh-oh. SWPL anti-gun fag alert! It’s the guns fault all of Obama’s sons kill and kill and kill.

        False comparisons and blaming “guns” will not save you from the truth, boy: darky is a violent, uncivilized creature who needs to be Jim Crowed away from humans.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 12:20 am whiskeysplace

        That is not true. For most of the Feudal era, commoners were quite law abiding. We know this from judicial records surviving. Same for China. Then, political instablity from technology, or invasion, or aristocratic foul-ups (high taxes and ineptness and corruption) … and the tumbrils start running and score-settling is the order of the day.

        White/Asian violence is … sudden, decisive, highly organized, mass-shock, annihilating. Black violence is every day, every way. That’s hunter-gatherer.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 1:33 pm Dan Fletcher

        Good points whiskey.

        +1

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 7:41 am goodspeed

        “Male poverty + Weapons = Violence”
        While I think poverty is part of the cause you have to ask why they are poor in the first place. The fact is that people in poor areas have IQs that sit on the left side of the bell curve and they probably also have other characteristics which also contributem such as increased impulsivity, aggression, etc.

        And see what CH wrote above about the Chinese, many poor but low crimerates.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:36 am whorefinder

        In his satirical article “Asian Privilege” Gavin McInnes pointed out the same about asian poverty.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 8:28 pm gramps

        Gracian,

        Your thesis, that poverty causes crime, was all the rage back in the 1960’s. Thus was born the Great Society. Crime became much more severe.

        Like I said in a previous post, there is nothing new. Just stuff people have forgotten.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:06 am corvinus

        “… essentially all MASS MURDER SHOOTINGS are done by young middle-class white American males,… ”

        He conveniently forgets Seung-Ho Choi or One Goh, or a number of blacks who have gone postal.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 12:03 am supra

      Gracian, the problem is now so massive (over 500 murders in Chicago last year, for example) that the black community as a whole, deserves the criticism. A good deal of ‘their’ culture is flawed. The quality black, latino, Asian, people you know are quality because they have adopted ‘white’ or I should say ‘standard Western & protestant work ethic type’

      values.http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/03/30/breaking-chicago-police-swarm-mag-mile-wilding-scene/

      Look at what happened on Saturday night in probably the most exclusive and tourist heavy areas in Chicago – not to mention the most upscale shopping area:

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 11:42 am Gracian

        1. The actions of those youth are disgusting. They should be thrown in jail for as long as possible, and their parents/guardians should be penalized.

        2. They youth are not representative of an entire racial classification of people, nor an entire culture.

        3. Your quote: “The quality Black, Latino, Asian, people you know are quality because they have adopted ‘white’ or I should say ‘standard Western & protestant work ethic type’.” My response: Caucasians and ‘the West’ do not have a monopoly on work ethic. Try traveling the world a bit, and you will see the absolute ridiculousness of your statement.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 4:27 am tang3zang

      In a way though, the frank display of racial attitudes here instead of bottled up political correctness is quite refreshing and also constructive.

      But posters here should consider that in the Western world, solidarity against feminism and liberalism is much more important than racial sensitivities. Unnecessary racism for the mere sake of racism is pointless. People like whorefinder should know that all you’re doing is furthering the feminist idea that the world’s prime source of villainy is the Straight White Male.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:58 am Dan Fletcher

        Wrong. The multicult is just another head of the Marxist-Hydra.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 5:53 am aleister

        This.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:33 am goodspeed

        Cant agree with this, one of the biggest issues in the West is immigration and any disagreement is considered racist.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 9:18 am Nonom

      Our theory is that genetic differences between races explain their different crime statistics.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:52 am Gracian

        No, I did not forget that the Asian shooter in VTech or the Latino shooter (I believe in Portland).

        As you will see from your own snippet of my writing, I preface my statement with the words “essentially all”.

        Frankly, the fact that you were able to recall that one(1) of shooter was non-White actually weakens your point.

        Look, if you racism is your thing, cool. It is what it is. However, the manifest weight of human history is neither on your side nor the side of any group claiming racial superiority (be they White, Black, or Asian).

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 9:59 am Dan Fletcher

        So you don’t think there are genetic differences between the races? Are you a Flat Earth Creationist as well?

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:04 am whorefinder

        As you will see from your own snippet of my writing, I preface my statement with the words “essentially all”.
        —Ignoring all the black mass shooters won’t help you, boy.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:11 am Gracian

        I cannot say that I am surprised….

        It is the same theory that early WASP Americans used in explaining Irish and Italian criminals.

        You can start your racial crime and superiority research here:

        http://xroads.virginia.edu/~ug03/omara-alwala/irishkennedys.html

        a. “Bostonians and Americans, held the Irish in such low opinion that they they were lumped in with the two other denigrated racial groups in this time period, the blacks and the Asians”.

        b. “Established working class America resented the Irish laborers who would work for anything”.

        c. “The Irish were also categorized as angry, alcoholic beings…who drank all the time in saloons and had regular bar brawls and parties filled with revelry and debauchery. They were illiterate, greedy,–therefore desperate to make it …bred like rabbits, and the Irish were entirely figured to be a stupid servant race by the Bostonians and most of “native” America.”

        Good luck with your theory…

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 1:07 pm Jason

        Gracian, I’ve brought that exact point up in these comments before. The silence was deafening.

        None of the haters here can explain the six-hundred-year-long English-Irish hatefest. It creates cognitive dissonance in their widdle bwains.

        [CH: Black dysfunction is not proof that intrawhite rivalry doesn’t exist, or never existed. Glad to see you continue a proud tradition of arguing against a phantom.]

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 4:12 pm Dan Fletcher

        So some white people didn’t like each other? That’s still true today. The point of bringing that up, or how it refutes genetic differences between races, is not clear.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 4:16 pm Dan Fletcher

        “None of the haters here can explain the six-hundred-year-long English-Irish hatefest. It creates cognitive dissonance in their widdle bwains.”

        Explain what exactly? That people fight each other?

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:02 pm Jason

        You’ve never stopped people from arguing against phantoms before, H, if they’re on the “appropriate” side. See any comment by whorefinder, who inserts bizarre imagined words into people’s mouths in order to make his point, and whom you never chide for it.

        My point: Lying by omission is still lying. You, being rhetorically more aware than most, should know that. And every example of dysfunctional black people that you promote without another example of global white, Asian, or Latino dysfunction — which are legion — is a shiv in the back of the rest of humanity. Your implication is always clear.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:23 pm whorefinder

        God, Sweetheart, you’re so full of shit, it’s no wonder you’re a lefty faggot. Your vagina is too wide to ever allow logic to come int.

        Fact: Comparing English-Irish hatred to black dysfunction is comparing a strong summer storm to Hurricne fuckin’ Katrina.

        See any comment by whorefinder, who inserts bizarre imagined words into people’s mouths in order to make his point, and whom you never chide for it.

        —Typical lefty projection-lying. He lies about what I do because he and his lefty pals are guilty of it.

        Blacks in comparison to ANY OTHER RACIAL GROUP and CONTROLLING FOR POVERTY AND FATHERLESSNESS still commit violent crime at a rate 7 TIMES HIGHER than anyone else. Any white group, Asian group, Latino group, Arab group, hell, whatever other non-black group you want to come up with.

        NO ONE wants to live with them, BECAUSE THEY ARE THE WORST PART OF CIVILIZATION. This is why the land prices in the “black” sections of towns or cities are so low—NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE WITH SAVAGES.

        Get your faggot head out of your faggot ass, son.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 8:11 am Dan Fletcher

        “And every example of dysfunctional black people that you promote without another example of global white, Asian, or Latino dysfunction — which are legion — is a shiv in the back of the rest of humanity. Your implication is always clear.”

        What the fuck? You have really gone off the deep end.

        No one said whites, asians, etc.. are without dysfunction. No one has ever argued that except for the strawmen in your brain.

        The point isn’t that whites are without dysfunction but rather the unshakable fact that black communities tend to have a super abundance of dysfunction in caparison.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 9:02 am thwack

        The point isn’t that whites are without dysfunction but rather the unshakable fact that black communities tend to have a super abundance of dysfunction in caparison.
        ——————————————————————————-
        Their super abundance of dysfunction is a consequence of the super abundance of mistreatment and abuse they recieve. This is the law of compensation; the equation must always balance. Now excuse me while I go beat my dog (Im teaching it to hate kneegers)

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 10:35 am Dan Fletcher

        “Their super abundance of dysfunction is a consequence of the super abundance of mistreatment and abuse they recieve. This is the law of compensation; the equation must always balance”

        Ah, it always comes back to “da evil white man”. That excuse grows thinner each time it is used.

        Tell me then why the most dysfunctional and primitive parts of Africa (sub-Sahara) are those in which the white man has had virtually no influence? According to your theory, west and south Africa, which have had the most white influence, should be the most dysfunctional and the largely untouched sub-sahara should be the least dysfunctional. However the opposite is true…

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 11:22 am thwack

        Dan, where is this fictional part of the world where the white man has no control?

        and why didn’t Saddam go there when the white lynch mob came after him?
        Dan, stop selling the myth of “black this and black that” as if kneegars have some place that is off limits from the white man. It don’t exist. If it did, I would be there. The sad reality is Im better off right here sucking on your wifes big white titty; it’l never go dry.

        White Power!

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 3:51 pm thwack

        Thank you Gracian, I too made your point earlier and the racists tried to ignore it. Many black people are not aware of the ways white people mistreated each other before they became white; i.e when they were still nationalities… The Prince of Wales is NOT Welsh; I didn’t know that? Don’t call a Ukranian girl “Russian”… Its confusing for black people because it is our presence which makes the white classification valid; so its often all we witness, therefore, we think its real. But its not because when one cracker wants to cut another crackers throat, they try to get me to help them.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 9:56 am Jason

      +1000

      Thanks, Gracian.

      LikeLike


  58. on March 31, 2013 at 7:53 pm Rum

    Gracian
    You miss the main point: Our side did not start this. CH wrote what is close to parody of the writing of some oh so Politically Correct Haters of White Males to show just how wrong headed and off-target the whole thing was.
    I was raised to have good manners; I think most folks here were as well. Along those lines, I would never insult a group of strangers because of whatever inherited biological facts characterize their pre-destined, unchosen appearance. Judge people as individuals, and all that…
    Things change a bit when the conversation begins from their side with a declaration that “white men” have some explaining to do regarding gun violence.
    I live in a town in Texas of 14,000 souls, virtually all white, that has had not a single citizen commit a single gun-crime in 30 years.

    BTW, that is as polite a way to say it as I could easily come up with.

    LikeLike


  59. on March 31, 2013 at 8:00 pm Rum

    Mass killings and free agent high level political assassinations nearly all come down to the shooter wanting to be really famous really fast.
    Maybe young white guys are simply more amibitious. Twisted and all wrong, but still a recognizable form of Calvinism.

    LikeLike


  60. on March 31, 2013 at 9:05 pm Anonymous

    FACT: Poor males pursue power, money, and status with violence if necessary, essentially to secure sexual access to females. Throw into that toxic mix broken homes, single-motherhood, despair, rage, and access to weapons, against the backdrop of a modern society that CLEARLY rewards winners (e.g. Wall Street mega-criminal banker) and scorns losers (e.g. unfortunate college-educated Walmart cashier) and you will have young, hungry, and aggressive males who have nothing to lose and everything to gain. So, nothing new here.

    -exactly, hence the issue is POVERTY. Race baiting is bullshit, no matter if it be from black or white sides of the fence.

    It’s seems many of you are allowing the opinions of these liberal idiots in Oregon, who probably don”t even know any black people by the way, to quantify your ego’s.

    If your girl wants to fuck a rapper, dump her and move on. If she wants to fuck some white dude who acts black, dump her and move on. If she wants to bang Lebron James, dump her and move on…you get it? Most of you sit behind your computer and will never even be touched by all of this violence that many hardworking folk have to deal with everyday.

    Btw, if you take these bullshit attitudes to England some Chav will fucking stick you and laugh at your dumb ignorant asses. you think blacks are more violent? Ever been to Glasgow or fucking Moscow? give me a fucking break

    War Diaz!

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 9:47 pm whorefinder

      Yawn. Another SWPL bitch fool.

      you think blacks are more violent
      –Statistics dictate that they are.

      Poverty is not the cause. Controlling for poverty, blacks commit WAY more violent crimes than non-Hispanic whites, hispanics, asians (South and East), and middle eastern (Arab, Persian, North African, Kurd, and other).

      Blaming poverty doesn’t work. If poverty were the cause, new Latino and Asian immigrants would be just as violent as blacks are. East Asians arrive very poor, and Mexicans come across as virtual slaves to the coyotes who bring them, and then, after paying them off, are controlled very heavily by their illegal status.

      And yet Latins and Asians have much lower crime rates, especially violent crime, than blacks.

      QED, SWPL bitch.

      Most of you sit behind your computer and will never even be touched by all of this violence that many hardworking folk have to deal with everyday.
      –_And if we do, it will most likely be doled out by a black man versus a non-black man.

      And if we deal with general social dysfunction ( swearing, rudeness, hostile activity), it more likely be blacks than non-blacks who dole it out.

      Fact: the “black” neighborhood or city near you is more violent and more dysfunctional than the local neighborhood or city run by any other ethnic group. The black neighborhood or city will have the lowest rents around—-because no one wants to live near blacks, because they are violent and anti-civilization in behavior. Moscow and Glasgow are eminently more livable than Detroit and Camden and Newark. The worst shithole in Asia is better than the worst shithole that blacks run.

      Face it: the old lies you told aren’t working like they used to. Figures don’t lie, and liars don’t figure.

      Adjourn your ass, son.

      LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 9:56 am Dan Fletcher

      “-exactly, hence the issue is POVERTY. Race baiting is bullshit, no matter if it be from black or white sides of the fence.”

      Okay. Then why do poor whites and asians not have the same crime problems?

      Marxist delusions are running thin….

      LikeLike


  61. on March 31, 2013 at 9:18 pm jim b

    i was uncomfortable reading this post, but after i linked through to the retarded washington post piece it parodied i appreciate the necessity of writing it for parody’s sake. statistically mass shootings are so rare that of course the majority will be responsible for them. (btw the ft hood mass shooter was arab and the va tech mass shooter was asian) but mass shootings are less than 100/year out of 12-13k homicides in a nation of 310mn. its super rare in spite of the headlines it gets. gang violence is 100+x more common, and that likely doesn’t have to do with the availability of guns at the local store

    LikeLike


    • on March 31, 2013 at 10:06 pm Gracian

      Agreed. Mass shootings are rare and over-played by the media.

      My point is this: Poor males do violence stuff. Read the history of the USA and you will see that the Italians and Irish was considered ‘rubbish-people’, because they were considered violent, unruly, and over-breeders. Yet, once they got their economic feet under them, everything was forgotten.

      Gang violence is as old as time. Ever watch the film ‘Gangs of New York’? The Black and Latino gangs and drug syndicates modeled their inner-structures from the Jewish and Italian gangs that came before them. Which is one of the reasons why in rap music you hear Black Males referring to themselves a “Gotti”, “Capone”, or “Scarface”, trying to be cool.

      LikeLike


  62. on March 31, 2013 at 9:28 pm Blowback from that WaPo op-ed I said would go viral | God's Own Crunk

    […] Related: Chateau Hartiste had this to offer.  […]

    LikeLike


  63. on April 1, 2013 at 1:19 am Anonymous

    LikeLike


  64. on April 1, 2013 at 2:00 am TheDoc

    I think we can all agree there is a particular strain of violence endemic to African (American) communities, particularly those concentrated in urban areas. I agree that its too simple to sweep it under the rug as simply a social issue because similar dynamics are missing in other urban areas where non-African American populations are similarly congested and marked by poverty. However, in order to extrapolate this dynamic and map it onto the entire African or African-descended population globally means that approximate statistics are evidenced in other areas in the world where Black folk live in similar conditions, particularly the African continent. The type of violence we see in cities such as Chicago, Los Angeles, Rio de Janeiro, Kingston, et al, seems obviously linked to the crazy world of slavery which spawned these communities. That shit was going on for longer than this country has been free (1600s-1865 as opposed to 1865-2013). Shit, many of those kids are only 3-4 generations removed from a world where Mandingo fights was common custom. The children of those Mandingo fighters continued that tradition when they migrated to northern cities during the 1930s-1950s and participated in the Battle Royals. Is it any wonder violence continues to plague these communities.

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 11:04 am Gracian

      You mean kinda like this…http://xroads.virginia.edu/~ug03/omara-alwala/IrishcartoonsVI.html

      Early American cartoon about the Irish and their violence (see child shooting a gun), drunkenness (man falling our of the window and vomiting), baby over-breeding (lady in the door-way and kids on top railing).

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 8:20 pm thwack

        Good one Gracian, but my personal favorites are all the Puck cartoon.

        Tam-O-shanti LOL

        http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oG7hurP1pRIGQAngdXNyoA?p=Puck%20cartoons%20irish&fr2=sb-top&fr=yfp-t-900

        LikeLike


    • on April 3, 2013 at 1:10 am Jason

      Yes. Absolutely.

      The fashion here, in this Chateau, is to claim genetics for black dysfunction.

      But the truth is much more complicated than that.

      Acknowledging that truth — the fact that slavery is the curse that keeps on cursing, as well as the fact of the awesome power of cultural momentum — hurts their widdle bwains.

      So they revert to simplistic explanations, such as black skin = savage.

      Why the proprietors of CH let it continue is beyond me.

      LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2013 at 1:46 am goodspeed

        Where do you think culture comes from? Here is some science:

        Character Traits Determined Genetically
        http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120516115903.htm
        “Genes play a greater role in forming character traits — such as self-control, decision making or sociability — than was previously thought, new research suggests.

        A study of more than 800 sets of twins found that genetics were more influential in shaping key traits than a person’s home environment and surroundings….”

        WIth this in mind it becomes clear that a populations culture is primarily caused by their genes.

        LikeLike


  65. on April 1, 2013 at 4:29 am tang3zang

    So are they sisters or lesbians?

    “0.0 kids”

    lawl

    LikeLike


  66. on April 1, 2013 at 7:13 am thwack

    It has to be the height of irony that the negro savage so hated on this blog is the very being which will prevent the commies/corps from enslaving all mankind. Reminds me of “War of the Worlds” where the Martian invaders conquered all nations, only to be defeated in the end by some chicken pox.

    LOL

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 8:10 am Rogue Male

      Bottom line, the only good one is a dead one, 99 times out of 100.

      LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 4:28 pm santa666

      Naw, after they get done using you to crush the white middle class, they’ll put you back on the leash.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 8:39 pm thwack

        Right, so we should just stay criminal and thug like, correct? Also, before I forget, during formal slavery when it was illegal for black people to learn to read and write, guess which kneeggers were walkin around with peices of chalk, paper, carving letters on trees, makin ink from blackberries… EXACTLY, these same criminal thug neegers you love to hate. loudmouth beligerant nogs do not just spring from whole cloth, they are made; I know cause Im one of em:

        LikeLike


  67. on April 1, 2013 at 9:32 am Schnoorky

    The only thing that matters is that African countries are remaining African, Asia countries are remaining Asian, Arab countries are remaining Arab, while White countries and only White countries are becoming, and are forced to become, more “diverse”. This is obviously a policy of White genocide. There are NO places that are allowed to remain White. Hell, even the small white towns here in eastern Iowa are FORCED to accept Section 8 housing for Africans from Chicago. If they don’t, the FedGov will come after them with a vengeance and all will be called Naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews. When will we be allowed to discuss this ongoing policy of White genocide in the open publicly?

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 10:17 am thwack

      When will we be allowed to discuss this ongoing policy of White genocide in the open publicly?
      ————————————————————————————
      Only when you stop licking the boots of your white masters (how can you kill John Wayne when you want to BE John Wayne?)

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 10:34 am Rogue Male

        Chicongo! Chicongo!–that Third World town.
        Chicongo! Chicongo!–you can tell it’s shit brown. I love it.
        Bet your bottom dollar you’ll lose your life in Chicongo, Chicongo.
        The town that whitey couldn’t shut down.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 10:29 am TheDoc

      Cough. I think I hear indigenous Americans laughing uproariously at that one… 🙂 On a serious note, I actually agree with your analysis. I don’t think its fair that government is eliminating choice. Elimination of choice (in any context) is slavery. If communities desire to remain homogenous (which I believe to be a natural inclination) then that should certainly be respected.

      LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 8:35 pm gramps

      Yeah.

      When the US govt shipped a bunch of Somali refugees to Maine (no jobs, bad weather, no sunshine, but no blacks), it was obvious what the agenda was.

      The govt is malignant.

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 12:08 pm The Truth Hurts

        The importation of Somalis to Maine and Minnesota has to be one of the worst examples of intentional race replacement ever seen. Unfortunately “Christian” charities have been receiving Bernanke Bucks to assist in this demographic-alteration genocide scheme. Even some of the most “anti-racist” people I know realize that, at worst, the Somali importation has had some negative consequences in the communities they were resettled…and at best they don’t understand the motive of taking such actions. The important thing, as I’ve stated before, is what stops us from defending against such actions is that we are afraid of other WHITE MEN. If white men were confident that they would be backed up by other white men in stopping the shitting on of white men by both the mutlicult and feminism…this all would come to a screeching halt. Ideas and beliefs spread rapidly. Realize what it is we are afraid of, not minorities or women, it’s other white men.

        LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2013 at 8:53 am Canadian Friend

      It is white genocide.

      Forced race replacement is genocide.

      LikeLike


  68. on April 1, 2013 at 10:47 am Stilicho

    The description of the authoresses of the WaPo piece truly speaks volumes:

    “Charlotte and Harriet are identical twins who live near each other in Oregon. They are active in their communities, serving on boards of public and historic parks, schools, and neighborhood and community organizations. They enjoy long walks, camping, commuting by bicycle/walking/bus, organic gardening, cycling, dancing, reading, needlework, backpacking, and cuddling with beloved cats and dogs. ”

    Let me translate for you:

    “We are too manjawingly fugly for even recreational pump-and-dumps on 50 cent draft night at the Crack Whore Cafe, so we have channeled our self-hatred into mysandrist aggression, racism, and cats. Lots and lots of cats.”

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 6:35 pm Nicole

      …and these are the oh so superior White women I’m supposed to be emulating?

      No thank you.

      LikeLike


  69. on April 1, 2013 at 11:16 am The_Raygun

    As has been said already, why don’t you see the level of violence in poor white communities? Poor Asian ones? There are FAR more poor whites in America, yet you do not see violent crime rates like the ones in black communities. The whole “oh, it is because of poverty” line can only go so far. Yes, poverty contributes to crime. Impoverished areas will always have higher crimes rates, but why the difference in crime rates between the races that are basically at the same poverty level with each other?

    Is it because of RAAAZZZISUMSZ!? No, actually I cannot think of a more stereotyped, made-fun-of, cast out, thrown-away demographic as poor whites, ESPECIALLY poor white Southerners. They are dog shit to most people and do not enjoy the unwritten law of “Anti-Racism™”. Blacks are a protected demographic. They are the golden idol to the left and the modern “right”. Criticizing poor whites does not bring down the wrath of god as when you criticize poor blacks. It comes down to biology, I think. It is dishonest and downright silly to say that evolution had the 100% same effect on all human populations across the planet in different environments. Quite simply, Blacks are more prone to crime. This is supported by vast amounts of data and crime reports from many non-biased sources. Even though crime in general is decreasing, the demographic who is still largely responsible for most crime are noon-whites. With the decline of whites in their own country that their grandfathers and great grandfathers built, and the rise of the non-white minority, you probably WILL see crime rates shoot up again within the next 20 years to startling levels.

    The jig is up. The results are in. The fat lady is finishing. The music has STOPPED.

    LikeLike


  70. on April 1, 2013 at 11:26 am Nicole

    I can’t believe I’m in a men’s blog having to explain to grown men why they might have to do some actual work to preserve their cultures instead of hoping that if they cry enough about other people being mean, the Civilization Fairy will bring them a Perfect Society.

    Mind boggled.

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 1:17 pm Rogue Male

      Let’s start by ending the welfare state programs propping up the ghetto shit holes and letting them all collapse into ruin, taking their shitty populations with them. If 30 million blacks die, so be it.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 3:33 pm A. Fungi

        So in this plan of yours, you expect 30 million blacks to starve themselves to death in an orderly fashion, trapped by imaginary neighborhood borders, instead of relocating in order to burglarize and rob well-off whiteys in other parts of the country? Or maybe even get jobs there?

        And why do you say “let us start by”, as if you were somehow part of the people making decisions instead of Diebold voting machines operated from Israel?

        Hey, I have a plan for you. Let’s start by doing the impossible! Then move on to accomplishing the infinitely unlikely! From which we progress to implementing the hopelessly unrealistic! I’m quite ready here, just give me the signal, guys.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 4:17 pm Rogue Male

        “So in this plan of yours”

        Are we to take it that you were allowed to graduate HS without obtaining a clear comprehension of the concept of hyperbole?

        “relocating in order to burglarize and rob well-off whiteys in other parts of the country?”

        Thank God for the 2nd Amendment. Target-rich environment.

        “Or maybe even get jobs there?”

        ROTFLMFAO. They don’t want to work, dummy.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:12 pm The_Raygun

        The only true answer is secession. I can honestly see the US breaking up along racial lines within the next 50-80 years.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 8:23 pm Nicole

        It won’t happen because the wealthy don’t want it to, and neither do the non wealthy who are dependent on currency. At the moment, most Americans are too dependent on the system and infrastructure to risk their survival in a revolution or a race war that would end up turning into a civil war.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 4:19 pm thwack

        Rogue Male
        Let’s start by ending the welfare state programs propping up the ghetto shit holes and letting them all collapse into ruin,
        ——————————————————————————
        Sorry, but your white overlords will never let it happen because there is too much money in managing black pathology. Too many good white 6 figure jobs dependent on maintaining and managing black dysfunction. Please try again.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 4:23 pm Rogue Male

        “Too many good white 6 figure jobs dependent on maintaining and managing black dysfunction.”

        And the majority of black jobs, or more accurately, “jobs”.

        But a man can dream, can’t he?

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:32 pm Nicole

        Then it’ll be just like Africa. I’m for it. 🙂

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2013 at 1:26 pm Dan Fletcher

      Weak ass straw man, Aunt Jemima. Show me a single post where people deny that work is needed to preserve our culture.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2013 at 6:31 pm Nicole

        You do understand that this is why I’m being argued with, do you not?

        …because I posed the unthinkable idea that if one is going to claim to be superior, that has to start with actually being superior.

        LikeLike


  71. on April 1, 2013 at 8:08 pm Antifeminist One

    Imagine if American women and girls were committing misandry and bigotry hundreds of times, month after month, year after year. Articles and interviews would flood the media, and we’d have political debates demanding that female Americans be “held accountable.” Then….

    LikeLike


  72. on April 1, 2013 at 9:16 pm Crank

    woah. Not sure if it’s already been posted, but the website these two twin broads have is something pretty weird.

    http://www.cluelessatthetop.com/h_and_c_childress.html

    LikeLike


  73. on April 1, 2013 at 11:29 pm Anonymous

    grr black black people suck!…grrr white people suck! and so forth… and so forth…and so forth…

    this is boring, let’s talk about chicks man..

    LikeLike


  74. on April 2, 2013 at 12:10 am Nicole

    Okay, I am no longer going to argue with people who’ve decided that I’m subhuman just because my skin is brown. You are overly entitled peasants who pretty much deserve whatever oppression you’re getting. From now on, when you accuse me of being part of some global conspiracy to keep you down, I’m just going to agree because honestly, people who trade freedom for safety deserve neither.

    As far as I’m concerned, your opinion means as much to me as the same kind of Black porch monkeys and crybabies who are upset that the sun doesn’t rise when they wake up.

    LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2013 at 10:20 am Jason

      Yeah, Nicole, nothing is going to stop the hate machine here. Nothing.

      But you’re fighting the good fight.

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2013 at 1:54 pm Nicole

        Jason, I honestly wonder about that. This doesn’t really seem to be a fight worth having. It isn’t worth having it with self pitying African Americans. It isn’t worth having with self pitying European Americans. Fail is fail. Some people are up for the challenge of living and gaining or maintaining status, and some aren’t.

        I believe that I’ve been guilty of over scrubbing the spots and neglecting the clean, and will have to remember this mistake in future discussions of this sort. Those who have something meaningful to contribute to the discussion, deserve more attention than people who paradoxically buy the liberal mythology but claim to be right wing or free thinkers.

        LikeLike


    • on April 3, 2013 at 7:53 am thwack

      Nicole
      Okay, I am no longer going to argue with people who’ve decided that I’m subhuman just because my skin is brown.
      —————————————————————————-
      Nicole, your counter racism style is quite effective, Ive watched you land some devastating truth bombs; especially when you “go spiritual” on them. I think you and I know the “secret”. White people are like watching ballet. from far away it looks graceful and magical… but close up you see the work; the sweat,the struggle… strain…racism is far rfrom magical

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 5:21 am Nicole

        Especially when you consider the origins of its malignant rather than merely oversensitive flavor.

        The colonized are convinced that they became the colonists.

        LikeLike


    • on April 3, 2013 at 4:55 pm Bardon

      I doubt most commentators here think that blacks are “subhuman”. Perhaps the consensus- OK, more or less- would be that black race (the vast majority) is not fit to live productively and successfully in modern technological societies- at least not as parasites. It has nothing to do with racism, slavery or some kind of “privilege”. It has everything to do with evolution and biological differences between races. And it is the same- or similar- type of black behavior everywhere, from US and Brazil to Colombia, Jamaica, Haiti to subsaharan Africa and elsewhere. Blacks are fit to live in agricultural societies in a certain climate. (Post)modern world is functional only for whites and Asians (east), plus some Hindu Indian creme de la creme and a small part of “others”, blacks included. It’s that simple.

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 12:57 am Nicole

        Bardon, at least speaking for myself, I am not fit to live in what you’d term modern circumstances. I consider this a good thing though, when you look at what modernity means:

        feminism
        de facto slavery to corporations
        inability to provide for one’s own and family’s basic needs without near imaginary currency
        loss of culture and traditions that foster less dependence on government

        The list could go on about the inhumanity of modernity. We have a lower tolerance for it because we generally haven’t had as much time in that situation to adapt to it. Also, even the modern world is not so stable and secure that none of us need our agricultural and hunter-gatherer abilities.

        In my observation, many European races seem to be doing badly with modernity as well. Some cope by bringing patently rural/agriculturalist behavior into the cities they’re stuck in.

        There is a tendency to pathologize natural reactions. When boys are made to sit for 8+ hours a day in a classroom, and have trouble doing it, they say the boy has ADHD. They give him drugs when what they should do is find a way to educate him that allows him to move around more and learn from direct observation.

        Much of what is done to make life better for people makes it worse. Maybe some kids need to have to walk 5 miles to school uphill both ways and have to stuff newspapers in their shoes for insulation…

        Maybe the Spartans had a point.

        LikeLike


  75. on April 2, 2013 at 12:15 pm Mass murders a white-male, not mental-health, issue

    […] Today 07:15 PM #8 strong_hand Junior Member Status : Online Join Date : Jun 2012 Location : West Coast, USA Posts : 59 Liked : 328 times Reputation : 691 The two women are nuts. Someone wrote a spoof of their article: Black Men Have Much To Discuss About Murderous Crime | Chateau Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  76. on April 2, 2013 at 1:01 pm anononononno

    I guess the dikes have a point. Most while people have (or had) no problem with violence. But you can still walk through our neighborhoods late at night.

    LikeLike


  77. on April 2, 2013 at 6:52 pm “White men have much to discuss about mass shootings” | destructure

    […] Heartiste answered with a parody titled Black Men Have Much To Discuss About Murderous Crime […]

    LikeLike


  78. on April 3, 2013 at 7:36 am Bardon

    They just can’t escape their nature.
    http://whitelocust.wordpress.com/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners/

    https://whitelocust.wordpress.com/the-reality-of-racial-differences/

    LikeLike


    • on April 3, 2013 at 3:41 pm Canadian Friend

      Whitelocust is great site full of fascinating facts about race.

      If one believes there is still such a thing as white privilege, reading a few pages of facts at Whitelocust should cure you of your delusional state… or make you foam at the mouth even more

      LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2013 at 5:53 am Nicole

      Nobody escapes Nature.

      LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 8:34 am Canadian Friend

        Maybe no one can escape nature but some people spend their whole life denying nature.

        LikeLike


      • on April 4, 2013 at 12:09 pm Nicole

        Of the two groups, I’d say that was more of a White thang.

        All is not lost though. A growing number of folk of Nordic and Slavic ancestry are bringing scary back.

        It may be in your nature now, because of over a thousand years of having independence actively suppressed by your churches and governments, but as many revolutions have proven, you’ve still got it in you somewhere. The problem is that once enough heads have fallen, you tire of maintaining your freedom, and some demagogue creeps in promising to lead you to prosperity only to oppress you again.

        You know I have no problem whatsoever with homosexuality, but you wouldn’t believe how many times I’ve been called a homophobe for saying that it’s funny how once Gays got the freedom to be who they are, they run under the government’s skirt for more regulation of who they are. Both Gay and Straight people should be fighting for family fairness and less government interference in romantic and family matters, but they want to follow the mainstream Straight people into marriage 2.0.

        While you are still allowed to think, do that. Determine that more regulation of things that should be personal is bad, and stick to that. Check yourself whenever you consider backing any movement that would grow money for the government and take money from the citizens. Better, check yourself on anything that would lead to less self sufficiency or even less need for self sufficiency.

        Don’t be so quick to vote for things that you think would make life easier or safer, but do pay attention to issues that would make any government agency or corporation better able to screw you.

        It may be in your nature to prefer to capitulate, but as with sexual game, now that you know better, you have a choice. The fact that you can see the choice at all means you might be capable of making one.

        LikeLike


  79. on April 4, 2013 at 2:01 am 141

    IQ is half the equation, culture is the other half.

    Too understand the negroes a little better, reverse the situation.
    Say a few hundred years ago white people were taken from europe to africa as slaves, then the black people decided to let the white people free, but the white people weren’t as intelligent, so they couldn’t compete and stayed poor, then the black people gave the white people free school where they constantly reminded the white people that their ancestors were their slaves.

    If that were me, I’d hate black people for enslaving my ancestors, i’d be jealous of their success, envious of their intelligence and technology, but i wouldn’t be smart enough to leave and replicate it.

    Back to reality :

    The best solution (for the poor whites) is to deport them.
    The best solution (for the rich) is to keep them around to divide and distract the poor, suppress wages by keeping the supply side of labor up, and slowly killing them off through feminism, abortion, the war on drugs, etc.

    LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2013 at 10:01 am thwack

      141
      IQ is half the equation, culture is the other half.
      Too understand the negroes a little better, reverse the situation.
      ——————————————————————————-
      It doesn’t matter what your IQ is, if the dominant culture qualifys you for mistreatment based on appearance, you will never be as smart as you should be because they will prevent you from doing more things. Smart = the ability to do more things. If you are prevented from doing more things, how can you become smarter?

      LikeLike


  80. on April 7, 2013 at 8:30 am Gq

    get over yourself you racist cunt. or stop being scared of the black dick

    LikeLike


  81. on April 9, 2013 at 1:01 am ghana entertainment

    true but racist facts , , but in my opinion some are rasclas , while others are good . im saying this coz im familiar with black culture

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Amon Ra on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Ron on Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat C…
    Gershom on The Confound Of Silence
    Mabui on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    cortesar on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Manifest Depravity
    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: