Looks like we have another case of an ugly feminist engaging in some psychological projection through the medium of a hate crime hoax.
According to Wyoming’s Star-Tribune, on the non-university affiliated Facebook page UW Crushes, which has since been shut down, a post appeared last week that read:
“I want to hatef— Meg Lanker- so hard,” the Facebook post said. “That chick that runs her liberal mouth all the time and doesn’t care who knows it. I think its hot and it makes me angry. One night with me and shes gonna be a good Republican b—-.”
Strong projection. Anyone doubt this is one fat, ugly feminist who secretly desires to be sexually ravaged by a clean-cut, offensively tumescent registered Republican man?
This controversial post Meg Lanker-Simons reported the post to university administrators and campus police, telling the Laramie Boomerang that as a rape survivor this is “one of the worst things someone can threaten.”
On Tuesday, though, it was revealed by University of Wyoming Police Department that they had cited Lanker-Simons herself for the threatening post. In a separate article, the Laramie Boomerang reported police obtained a warrant to search the student’s computer and found substantial evidence verifying that the offending Facebook post came from Lanker-Simons’ computer, while the computer was in her possession.”
B U S T E D.
You’d almost think that what most feminists really crave is romantic attention from strong-willed, unapologetically sexist men who would throw them around in bed like ragdolls if they didn’t weigh 200 pounds, rather than the feeble, teary-eyed, obsequious cloying attention they actually get from the manboobs orbiting them like sad, defunct satellites.
tumescent
LikeLike
offensively.
LikeLike
The unapologetic sexist man throwing his chick around like a ragdoll fantasy is the whole reason for my monicker.
LikeLike
The pain for which your body yearns is the pain of childbirth.
LikeLike
No it aint.
LikeLike
Is to.
LikeLike
Yes it is.
And the craving won’t be satiated until that child’s head breaks apart the bones of your pubic mound as it emerges from your birth canal.
LikeLike
That, or until she gets a good, unlubricated ass fucking.
LikeLike
Nailed it. Female masochism is simply an evolutionary advantage, so that women won’t mind getting taken by men (which hurts at first) and bearing their children (which hurts a LOT). It just gets twisted into this lifeless, antiseptic “50 Shades of Gray” S&M nonsense the longer they continue to deny their biological imperative. There are no women with darker ravishment fantasies than lonely middle-aged spinsters.
These silly chicks will never get it though. The cultural rot has sunk too deeply into their brains.
LikeLike
“Nailed it. Female masochism is simply an evolutionary advantage, so that women won’t mind getting taken by men (which hurts at first) and bearing their children (which hurts a LOT). ”
I don’t buy it. My theory of female masochism is the following:
1. Tribes that built up the aggression and capability to raid neighboring tribes, kill the men and enslave the women were more reproductively successful than tribes who were too peaceful or not capable enough to do this.
2. When the women were enslaved by the brutes that killed their immediate relatives and forced to have sex and have children, the women that could find a reason to cooperate with their captors were more reproductively successful. The women who ran away, violently rejected their captors or killed them in their sleep all did not reproduce.
3. The most effective instinct that allowed women to tolerate their captors was sexual masochism, which made them actually like them. Actually liking them helped them in turn gain affection from their owners. Then their children would be treated better with better food and clothing, which at the time was important as survival till adulthood was precarious.
Children aside, some degree of female sexual and romantic masochism is probably by this point inherited almost universally among women though some women feel it consciously more than others.
LikeLike
Wow, that is pretty profound.
LikeLike
femx, you’re nuts. We’re basically saying the same thing, except you’re using a lot more unnecessary words.
LikeLike
Feministx’s theory would be better to replace “masochism” with “submissiveness.” But her digit ratio won’t let her take it that far.
LikeLike
QED.
LikeLike
Some ladies experience orgasm when giving birth.
LikeLike
There is no justice. lol
LikeLike
That must account for the whole fisting thing…
LikeLike
You are so hot femx.I think I speak for all of the beta’s on this site when I say we think you are sexy and adorable. We would love to recite love poetry to you,lick you from your odiferous toes past the black thatch of love all the way up to your luscious lips,spending an inordinate amount of time and attention on tnat sweet sweet azz. The alphas? They porbably would throw some yogurt down yer throat or up yer ass if they’d had a few beers in ’em.
LikeLike
I can dig that if you are really good looking and have a lot of finesse in the way you move.
And good for you, dude! At least you know what you like and don’t pretend you are some other man than what you are with some other desires than what are really yours. It’s better than being like “hearts told me to be like this. Yeah! I’m such a dude like that too. Imma gonna mold myself in his image now.”
LikeLike
I wanna hatefuck the black out of you.
LikeLike
RAPE? xD
LikeLike
femx, he is clearly being facetious, and for that error kneel down and make some yogurt
LikeLike
“I’m such a dude like that too”???
You’re boring.
LikeLike
Hey, she may be boring but she’s getting exactly what she wants, right? Some of us have been around here long enough to remember when she was a man-hating lesbian feminist, and then when she was bisexual and desperate for a dominant alpha male, and then when she was posting her butterface nudes everywhere, all the way up to her now dating an old married dude and hating sex.
None of her personas have any internal consistency except that they’re all a) weird and aspie, and b) designed for maximum attention whoring. But I’ll say no more, in case I accidentally scare her away from posting more ass shots.
LikeLike
Perhaps it is a valuable lesson for men to screen women for more than looks? Nah, they’re not paying attention 🙂
LikeLike
her ass too big for me could be optical illusion though from last ass shot I got of my chick
ever since nicknaming her feminyiest I been good though he he he
need pic of spirals ass though now come on its been forever
LikeLike
I don’t disagree with the factual aspects of the case you have presented, but I don’t think your impression of me is fair.
I did start out as a person who identified as a feminist? Why? Because it’s basically the default position that education endows upon you. Then I went onto the internet and found information that contradicted what I had been told. Unlike 99% of women, I actually reflected upon the interactions I had with people and engaged people and digested the information found in the “dark enlightenment” corners of the internet. I found that the aspects of their argument closely related to data and evolutionary psychology actually had merit from an empirical basis. So, I changed my view points.
I am still very bisexual. I still am very attracted to alpha male personalities. I ended up with a beta personality for a few years. I love my boyfriend, but I am no longer attracted to him as our relationship has grown too much like a father-daughter relationship.
I realized that I called myself a feminist because I feared men for what I wanted them to be. Some feminists are obsessed with rape culture and believe that men are all waiting to rape them because of their interest in power, not sex. This is feminists loathing men for what they fantasize men to be. They don’t understand that it is their own ideal of men that they fear.
I am not a borderline personality. I am not inconsistent. I am a human being with an open mind that can learn and change from both experience and information.
LikeLike
Haha gunny, you’ll need to ask my husband’s permission if you want me posting ass shots on the internet.
P.S. He’ll say no.
LikeLike
Because using a “provocative” feminist-themed screen name with a sexually-themed icon is the best way to convince men to respect you as an equal.
LikeLike
Oh, now you’ve gone and RUINED IT!!
LikeLike
I like watching her hamster in action. Don’t drive her away.
LikeLike
I’m pretty sure that would be impossible.
LikeLike
Convince men to respect me as an equal? Food for thought. Honestly, I never considered doing such a thing before.
LikeLike
You’d actually have to be an equal first.
LikeLike
You girls do love it. Works for me
LikeLike
I love it when you try so earnestly to cogitate. It is cute, like a little girl trying on daddy’s shirt and shoes. You know that the evo-psych stuff is too thin a veil even on sites like these which worship it (almost literally: “biomechanics is god”), right?
All the “scientists” (dorks in lab coats) do is obfuscate the obvious. They derive their power from appointing themselves shamans of The Great Unseen Forces, for only they can interpret what’s real and what’s artifice.
Science is anti-manly. Men make assertions and bluffs and back them up by personal power, not observation, experiment, charts, and graphs. They don’t untangle Gordian knots, they slice them with their sword. The attempt to quantify manliness onto the nerd spreadsheet of “science” is the great irony of the self-proclaimed alphasphere.
Our job is to simplify. Men speak from experience, from the evidence of the senses. They do not trust the frauds who assure them about laws whose proof is not possible by plain demonstration, even if those laws are true. It is about the independence a man derives from self-confirmation rather than faith. It is about trust more than truth.
Rather than proceeding from “theor[ies]” spun off the top of some of some broad’s ditzy little head, we say show us. Don’t talk about fairies and cosmic forces and great invisible hands which guide our behavior. Speak plainly in common terms with which the master relates. The snarky, geeky, “This is above your comprehension, my lord” will not do. It doesn’t matter if the master is a dullard. You have to put it in terms a dullard can comprehend. You have to make it pleasing to the powerful, who holds your fate in his hands.
In other words, return to Aristotle. Proceed from the wisdom of experience, the knowledge of the senses. It’s so much simpler than imaging ourselves oracles of the veldt.
Why are women masochists? Because they are the submissive sex.
Why are they the submissive sex? Because they are the smaller and frailer sex.
Why were they made smaller and frailer? To encourage their passivity.
Why must their passivity be encouraged? So that the opposite sex could more easily act upon them.
Why must the opposite sex act upon them? Because that is in the physical nature of penetrative and penetrated parts.
Why would women seek pain beyond what’s necessary for the act? Because it is the most visceral evidence of their conquering.
Why would women make themselves difficult to conquer? Because it encourages a display of even greater strength to overcome their resistance.
Why do women love and hate pain? Because it is the surest sign their greatest resistance has been overcome, that she is true woman brought involuntarily to the world’s attention by true man.
Matt
LikeLike
“Science is anti-manly. Men make assertions and bluffs and back them up by personal power, not observation, experiment, charts, and graphs. They don’t untangle Gordian knots, they slice them with their sword….”
This unmanly science you so easily decry provids you with the computer you used to write your drivel, as well as the internet into which you spew your nonsense.
Aristotle’s scientific knowledge was just one short step above superstition.
Return to Aristotle? No thanks, little man. I’ll take modern science and medicine any day.
Our job is not to simplify. It is to understand, and act accordingly.
You are an unrealistic dolt.
LikeLike
“Aristotle’s scientific knowledge was just one short step above superstition.”
Can you explain why this is? I am aware that he believed many erroneous things, but in your view, what were the major problems with his way of thinking? (I’m asking because I don’t know. I can look it up, but you seem to have developed a strong sentiment about it, and I am wondering why.)
LikeLike
The greater efficacy of the modern empirical method over the aristotelian method was a conclusion arrived at through centuries of debate. I don’t know all the details of those arguments for it was settled before my time by better men than me. (I’m not a troll. Don’t get any ideas).
If you disparage the entire framework of reasoning I use, we can’t really have much of an exchange. You can read Popper or Francis Bacon if you want. Perhaps it will help you find out why those in the old world chose to devise the modern world instead.
LikeLike
Yes, but “efficacy” for what? To determine physical laws, biological constants, technology, economy — all very good. I said nothing about the scientific method’s success in certain narrow subfields. I was talking about overinterpreting that success into thinking it is sovereign and omnipotent.
“I don’t know all the details of those arguments …” I do. I read Popper and both Bacons, no one is here to gainsay them.
It’s not even a girl thing, as you are more informed in this matter (therefore more humble) than the uppity chode writing immediately above your comment. It’s the flip side of modernity, the bad we think we have to swallow along with the good. The proverbial scoop of shit in the gallon of vanilla ice cream.
The scientists have convinced you that the chair you’re sitting on is mostly empty space, which is good insofar as it is true and applicable to the general, cumulative knowledge project. But it is bad insofar as you have leased out your judgment to a shaman who regales you about invisible forces which only he is privileged to discern — especially with regard to practical and experiential matters which the method distorts beyond recognition. This may not bother the submissive sex so much, but any man with any real strength knows when an upstart is attempting to usurp his power base. I’ll reread Popper and Bacon and Bacon if you read up on Nietzsche’s unmasking of the will to truth as just another will to power. But this time, instead of blond beasts exerting their will, it is the slavish weak-willed sissy intellectuals foisting their weakness on “better men than” they.
In your attempt to apply the invisible shamanism to human behavior above, you demonstrate that we have taken the Cartesian concept into the social danger zone, where every ditzy broad thinks she can declare theories that explain action and power. Wisdom has been democratized, which only means the “will-to-truth” philosophers have successfully concealed their will to power by appealing to the amateur’s vanity and enthralling the masses with their myths.
And when I say myths, I am not talking about Euclid’s or Newton’s (or even Einstein’s) observations of the observable. I am talking about taking that method and applying it to the invisible and unobservable realm, such as human origins and psychology and virtue. Which is what every two-bit philosophaster (and blogster) does these days:
One in a hundred readers on this site will be able to follow what I’m saying, still fewer will give an adequate critique. You should know that some ideas are above your pay grade to dissect.
“For it was settled before my time by better men than me” is a gorgeous attitude. Run with it. And honor the superiors in your midst, as I do. It will take you places.
Your humility is an awesome power that will elevate you above so many arrogant ignoramuses, especially the men (like that fool preceding your comment) who think they can their little precious nugget of arcana authorizes them to tell people how it really is. A little knowledge is a self-destructive thing.
Women are poised to wield greater power than men because they are diminutive: the more they acknowledge their limitations, the more they are able to transcend them by hitching their star to the dominus, rather than trying to compete with it, as vain men do.
Submit, baby girl. I will take you places.
Matt
LikeLike
In freshman year of college, they told me that the aristotelian method was the foundation of empiricism because it did start with physical observation, but it was flawed because Artistotle did not understand the concept of a sample size. Hence, he made deductions from single observations, which led him to be incorrect when creating general rules. I didn’t probe the matter much further as that explanation alone seemed to be a sufficient criticism.
“The scientists have convinced you that the chair you’re sitting on is mostly empty space, which is good insofar as it is true and applicable to the general, cumulative knowledge project. But it is bad insofar as you have leased out your judgment to a shaman who regales you about invisible forces which only he is privileged to discern — especially with regard to practical and experiential matters which the method distorts beyond recognition. ”
I learned that matter is mostly space. I assumed that my hand can’t go through the table because the structural forces in the table matter interact with the structural forces in the matter that makes my hand in order to create some kind of repellant interaction which prevents me from going through the table, even though it is somehow mostly space. But I don’t know. That’s just my rationalization based on the rule I was presented. I don’t know if physicists have a complete explanation of why matter appears as solid sheets if it is indeed mostly space. I am guessing the phemonenon is well explained even though I don’t know what that explanation is.
Anyway, I do find that your tendency to doubt evidence presented when it conflicts with your own intuition potentially useful. It may actually enable the empiricists to come up with more complete explanations because you might be missing information if you cannot truly reconcile the evidence you have with your intuition that dictates otherwise. For example, I cannot myself reconcile why matter is mostly space since it appears otherwise. By admitting that my intuition is not fully satisfied with the information I have at hand, I am at least able to determine where I need more information.
In April, CH presented a study that showed that people viewed men with long torsos and short legs as more attractive than long legged men. This conclusion contradicts with my own preferences and intuition. However, I am not prone to trusting my own intuition over scientific studies unless the flaw in the study is immediately obvious to me. In the end, it may have been the case that the leg study was flawed and that my intuition actually does correspond to general preference. If I had had more faith in my own intuition and a deeper need to reconcile evidence presented with my own inner sense, than I would have been able to see the issue more accurately from the beginning.
“Submit, baby girl. I will take you places.”
Are you not married and a devout catholic? If so, I don’t think what you have suggested is allowed in the first place.
LikeLike
Sweet mercy, that is how they dismiss The Philosopher? Your teachers hated you.
I don’t doubt “evidence” (as you posit) in order to make their method more rigorous. I ask questions because questions are the path to a mutually apprehended truth, Socrates style.
This is a very difficult point to get across, but you seem to have a brain and some prior exposure to the issue, estrogen fogged though it may be. My criticism of scientism is not a criticism of the usefulness of the scientific method. It is a call for speculators to substantiate their claims about science’s sovereignty per se. Scientism is the faith which asserts without evidence that science is the only, superior, and legitimate method to discern truth. That may very well be the case, but the dweebs in research labs do not get to presume themselves masters until proven slaves, or, until forced to acknowledge their dependency on contingencies they are not aware of/have not examined.
The reason why I brought it up in the context above is because this is the properly manly way to approach a person’s claims about the significance of one’s life. I do believe that solid matter is mostly empty space, but I am aware of the precise limits of that belief, which is why I don’t allow it to loom any larger (or smaller) in my will than it properly should. The emptiness of that solid is not available to my senses; therefore I have to know the provenance of that particular belief so that I can police against some dork overstepping his expertise. And that’s all scientists do these days. For fucksake, Richard Dawkins is a zoologist. Noam Chomsky is a linguist. They have not earned the right to lecture me on the true meaning of anything, except select areas of entomology and etymology.
“I don’t think…” There you go thinking again. Stop cogitating and just listen. Whatever you “think” you know about my faith is, estimating low, probably 50-75% false.
I won’t confirm or deny any specifics in public except to say, yes, I am a devout orthodox Catholic. But what does that have to do with anything? I offered to dominate you. Do you still think domination is a sin — according to the malicious feminist redefinition? Again, you are thinking way too hard and too much. Let me worry about my sin. You have an outsider’s understanding of what “is allowed in the first place.”
Trust me, I “work out [my] faith in fear and trembling.” It’s not a joke or a bait or a ruse or a disguise. I especially want people like you to learn through my example how little you actually understand about my faith. It’s not a life of prohibitions. It is a life of voluntary disciplines that enable a greater liberty, while so many labor under the oppressive strictures of inescapable habits and impulses, calling their enslavement “freedom.”
My cup runneth over, little one. There’s plenty for you to sip, or, depending on your courage, to drink deep. You seek hurt and so you seek bad men, but they deliver pain out of pettiness, out of smallness of soul. They make the common mistake, to think that pain is always an evil. They don’t know how to hurt with love. I know lots of things.
Matt
LikeLike
If science is anti-manly, why are most scientists men? Why are women so repelled by STEM fields?
Good luck building a better weapon than a sword or perhaps primitive matchlock without science.
LikeLike
Because the typical man today is either a SWPL eunuch, overgrown manboy, greasy dork, or metrosexual faggot. The “empiricism” fetish helped assure that devolution. Which one are you?
You wouldn’t have a clue what I’m talking about because you are trying to demonstrate the worth of science itself through the scientific method. At least the chick in this thread cited Popper.
Your inane church of scientism declares Everything Good = Science / Everything Bad = Primitive Superstition. I don’t argue with zealots, much less comprehensively ignorant zealots of a faith they can’t even recognize as such.
LikeLike
rape survivor? paging Project Innocence….
LikeLike
Disgusting.
LikeLike
Your wrong bro. This one was actually pretty hot:
ads/2013/05/Meg_Lanker_Simons_Wyoming_Arrested_Hoax_Rape.jpg
LikeLike
LikeLike
LOFL!!!!!
LikeLike
QED
LikeLike
Here’s a fuller (heh) shot of the fatty
She looks like a Mongolian with Down Syndrome
LikeLike
Lololzzllxzzlolzzzxxxxxxx
LikeLike
Now, now… let’s be nice… to Mongolian Mongoloids.
LikeLike
Do they have eyes like white people?
LikeLike
Who knows? According to the house darkies here at the chateau, there’s no such thing as white folks.
LLOZOZOZOZOZLZLZLZLZOZOZOZLZLZLZLZL
LikeLike
the “defend her” FB page has a different photo of her, much ‘leaner’ if you will, but only from the chins upward and with, er, ‘makeup’
LikeLike
She has a husband. (WTF?)
Aaaand the winner of the Beta (maybe even Omega) of the Year Award goes to:
That whale had better pray her little manboob never stumbles across the Chateau (or a woman from outside the Anglosphere).
LikeLike
Yup, that’s what I thought. A walking sexual fantasy for Republican men everywhere.
LikeLike
That thing isn’t a fantasy for anyone.
Even intestinal parasites are like ” Not even if I was drunk and starving. “
LikeLike
YUCK! Damn is she ever delusional! No Republican guy would EVER want to get down with her. Hell no Democrat guy would either. Probably not even the Commies and Greens and I doubt Gramsci would even be willing to smoke her pole were he alive. Who the hell would ever believe this hoax? I find it doubtful that a guy who’s been in the slammer his whole life would even find her attractive when there are prison bitches available.
LikeLike
Re: that last paragraph…i no longer know whos more deluded in most cases, the orbiters or the orbited.
LikeLike
Lmao
LikeLike
awesome that it was caught
LikeLike
Yes, except (a) this is about the only place you’ll hear about it, and (b) whatever punishment is leveled against her will be nothing next to what they’d have done to whatever poor slob she hoped to pin this on. Therefore, this will just keep right on happening.
LikeLike
Wow. Another feminist lying about rape to score political points? I’m shocked – SHOCKED!
LikeLike
What this proves is that this woman actually likes rape more than I do. Why? Because, unlike her, I have never hijacked the police or justice system – thus depriving actual rape victims of these resources – just for personal attention.
LikeLike
Why is it always the ugliest women who are obsessed with rape?
As a woman in an urban area, I’m scared of being raped. I’m also scared of being mugged, murdered, identity thefted etc. The strong (and the desperate) prey on the weak – it’s just reality. That’s why I take basic crime prevention precautions, like not walking in poorly lit areas at night and not getting wasted drunk around strange men. I don’t know why these women believe it does any good to hold marches and protests and politicize rape like it’s somehow different from all other crimes.
LikeLike
If you closely read her wording on her fake threat, you’ll see why. It’s because they desire someone to desire them. Since that ain’t gonna happen in the real world, they invent boogiemen. This is their perverse way of raising their SMV. It’s a shortcut way to gain value in the dating market instead of the hard way, which would include exercise and learning how not to be insane.
LikeLike
That makes sense, but it seems like a surefire way to *lower* their SMV in the long run. When they get caught (and they always do), how many men are going to want to pursue a woman who is fat, unattractive AND a crazy bitch prone to making rape threats? I’d imagine even the lowliest omegas would steer clear of that mess, if only out of fear of prison.
LikeLike
Women like this lack any ability whatsoever to consider the long-run. I mean, look at her, she gonna have diabetes by the time she’s 30.
LikeLike
Other than being a feminist, isn’t “Lanker-Simons” Jewish? Very familiar scenario.
If she could get over her mother’s guilting and let a few black guys tap her fat ass, she might lose a little hostility.
LikeLike
That’s pretty much my first thought as well. Good catch.
LikeLike
and looks like they obviously need to reopen that rape case that she survived
LikeLike
Who says she’s actually a “rape survivor”? Oh yeah, she did, the same person who faked a rape threat.
LikeLike
I hope some alert policeman is also looking into whatever rape she claims to have “survived.” If there was an actual charge against an actual man, it might well be another bit of delusional attention-seeking.
LikeLike
“Anyone doubt this is one fat, ugly feminist.”
Guess not…
LikeLike
freedom of speech lolz
LikeLike
Oh god… This is just ridiculous and oh so expected.
LikeLike
According to some of the comments in the local newspaper, this isn’t the first time she threatened people with rape charges either
http://laramieboomerang.com/articles/2013/04/30/breaking_news/doc518002170be89677502843.txt
LikeLike
Will this get reported on Jizzabullsh*t?
LikeLike
Not sure if this is a coincidence, but she has a blog (aptly named cognitive dissonance) that links to her personal begging page where she is asking for donations for an appendix surgery: https://www.wepay.com/donations/send-cognitive-dissonance-your-love
‘I’m asking the fine folks of Tumblr (and the internet at large) for donations because emergency surgery to remove an appendix time bomb has left our budget stretched beyond the breaking point. We’re finding it impossible to cover medical bills, pay rent and utilities, buy groceries, and though I’ve been looking for full-time work, it’s been difficult to find anyone who’s even hiring. My husband and I are both working and going to school, but it’s just not enough.
Collected
$2,410.34
Suggested Donations
$750.00 You just paid our monthly rent
$500.00 You just paid our car payment and electric bill
$250.00 You just bought us gas and groceries for a month
$100.00 You just fed us and our kitties for two weeks
$50.00 You just paid our car insurance
$20.00 Twenty bucks is twenty steps closer to paying off medical debt
$15.00 Fifteen bucks is half a tank of gas, a small grocery run, etc.
$10.00 Ten bucks brings us closer to paying off surgery
$5.00 Just five bucks brings us five steps closer to rent’
Seems she decided $2.4k wasn’t enough…
LikeLike
Lots of blogs accept donations, I tend to think of it like tipping. But this was pathetic. By giving us a sob story like that it goes from “If you like my stuff show some love” to a bum begging for change.
LikeLike
“We’re finding it impossible to cover medical bills, pay rent and utilities, buy groceries, and though I’ve been looking for full-time work, it’s been difficult to find anyone who’s even hiring. ”
BOO-HOOO-HOOOOOOOO!
“I can’t find a job because I voted for a guy because he’s black and it turns out that being black doesn’t equate to good leadership skills or economic knowledge.”
Cry me a river,you stupid bitch.
LikeLike
OT: Heartiste should accept bitcoins for doations
The currency is a great tool for hiding any assets or transactions from daddy government and its various taxes and seizures (aka wealth redistribution to women via beta bux and state cuckholding apparati)
LikeLike
Here is a tip for her: quit going to school for a degree in 18th century Lesbian poetry in colonial Dutch South Africa… or whatever crap. There is no ROI for most of it. It is a scam to get money and put you in the one kind of debt you can’t get out of. Student loans.
LikeLike
$1.98 You just launched a load down my throat
LikeLike
$100 bucks for food? By the looks of her that might be a rather conservative estimate. Maybe she should try eating the cats first…
LikeLike
it also only says I want to hatefuck not I will
so big deal
LikeLike
That beforeitsnews article just confirmed what I thought before I saw it: Class A attention whore. Hey, it’s all good because it really could have happened and she’s drawing attention to the issue, right?
LikeLike
I blithely predicted the hoaxing wave of events here on this blog some weeks ago, then carried the torch forward in my recent Spearhead essay “Dartmouth Shuts Down as Victim-Hoaxing Craze Sweeps Nation’s Campuses”
http://www.the-spearhead.com/2013/04/25/dartmouth-shuts-down-as-victim-hoaxing-craze-sweeps-nations-campuses
LikeLike
In the Laramie Boomerang article she criticizes the page administrators for not moderating the posts in advance. But she wrote the post herself. She seems to have a vendetta against UW Crushes and deliberately tried to embarrass them. Gee, I’ll give you one wild guess why!
The article describes the admins as engineering students. Translation, white cis beta males of the dongle joke variety, who are too trusting to look out for this stuff. Sometimes I wish I could get in the face of the younger me.
LikeLike
Just noticed… sometimes she’s called “Meg Lanker”, other times “Meg Lanker-Simons”. Looks like she found a weak omega manboob. (facepalm)
LikeLike
Jesus.
Hyphenating the last name is bad enough, but putting her name first…ugh…
Why bother with the hyphen at all? Why not just legally change her name to Meg “I have a weak husband” Lanker?
LikeLike
LikeLike
Just another fat, feminist harpy who thinks that if she screams loud enough, people won’t hear the lies over the cacophony.
The beta boy on the right is covering the spot where his balls used to be.
LikeLike
That tattoo on her arm is a measurement for how much of her fat sausage fist she can stick up is ass.
LikeLike
Wednesday-Thursday-Friday.
If it was some 5’3″ neckbeard who had been abused by his mother and programs Linux all day, that would be one thing. But this guy… he could be an alpha if he wanted to be. Yet he decides to hitch himself to that.
Honestly. Would there even be so many ugly fat feminist bitches if there weren’t so many weak-willed idiots hooking up with them?
grrrrr
LikeLike
thar she blows!
LikeLike
Looks like her motives are not just political – she has a begging page to ask donations for an appendix surgery. Already raked in over $2000. I wonder how much since she started the scandal…
https://www.wepay.com/donations/send-cognitive-dissonance-your-love
LikeLike
She also has a blog: http://cognitivedissonance.tumblr.com/
Nomen est omen
LikeLike
Are you fucking kidding me? Her blog is tittled “Cognitive Dissonance”?
….
LikeLike
I just went and looked at her picture. What’s the problem? Wait a minute . . . it’s the glasses, right? You guys don’t like her glasses. Yeah, I guess that she could get some more stylish glasses.
LikeLike
100% chance that when called on her bullshit, she claims it was done to “increase awareness of x”. Can we just chainsaw this bitch’s head off already?
LikeLike
Exactly anon, that and she’s an attention whore who isn’t getting any UW crushes because she’s apparently bitchy, tatted, and fat. So why not take out UW Crushes for the cause? Male sexual interest is all rape culture anyway, and the only people hurt are a bunch of white het male engineering bigots. What’s the rub?
LikeLike
I’ve never fucked a girl with a hyphenated name. Unless you count Latinas.
LikeLike
like one slave name ain’t enough?
(((shakin my head)))
LikeLike
Just google imaged her picture- made me want to hurl.
LikeLike
Her entire fucking blog is about rape. Rape rape rape, it’s all she cares about. It’s her entire self-identity.
The combined thoughts of rape from all feminists in the world hugely outnumbers the thoughts men have about rape. Rape culture is just one giant feminist rape fantasy they get off on. There’s no other explanation for their obsession.
LikeLike
Time for some black-knighting? The Laramie City prosecutor who will be handling the Mz. Meg Lanker-Simons case is Mrs. Ashley Schruck.
http://www.ci.laramie.wy.us/index.aspx?nid=91
I’m going to both call her office and write her encouraging her to throw the book at the lying libtard.
Mrs. Ashley Schruck
Assistant City Attorney and Prosecutor
406 Ivinson St.
P.O. Box C
Laramie, WY 82070
Ph: (307) 721-5321
LikeLike
size, shape, color, and texture (it is important to not forget texture)
LikeLike
Rape, she said? Hell, when the clowns saw her, they quit the circus and got straight 9 to 5 jobs.
And it takes a lot to make a clown do that, I must say.
/this one’s for you, whorefinder. 😉
LikeLike
It can be done!
LikeLike
She kind of looks like a drag version of Roger Ebert after he had his jaw removed. Apologies to the late Roger Ebert for comparing him to a fattie feminist.
LikeLike
The wording should have been a dead giveaway.
“runs her liberal mouth, and doesn’t care who knows it.”
That wasn’t written by anyone with testoterone. She couldn’t even figure out how to hate-rant properly, she had to compliment herself.
LikeLike
She also called herself hot. I think Sailer’s Law needs to be expanded (heh) to cover rape hoaxers.
LikeLike
She probably gives off a lot of heat.
LikeLike
You’d almost think that what most feminists really crave is romantic attention from strong-willed, unapologetically sexist men who would throw them around in bed like ragdolls if they didn’t weigh 200 pounds
Bro, DYEL?!
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
The reason why it was obviously a hoax was because that’s not a rape threat. It’s what an undesired feminist thinks a rape threat is.
LikeLike
From the campus newspaper. You can’t make this shit up:
“There are a number of disturbing aspects to this entire situation. The first reaction is one of repugnance and disgust for anyone who thinks it is appropriate or funny to threaten sexual violence. That is a behavior that should be so far beyond the pale that any individual should clearly know better.”
” If you think it is OK to threaten a violent sexual act to make a woman confirm to a man’s beliefs — as the post on UW Crushes’ site did — it can be viewed no less than the acceptance of a culture that encourages misogyny and violence toward women.”
But since it was a feminist that did it, none of this applies. Gotta love campus thought police.
LikeLike
The thing is, the phony post wasn’t even a threat of sexual violence. More like “trash talk.” And as far as I know “hate f__” is a term used to describe consensual sex with someone you are attracted to but dislike intensely. But at not point in her own stupid stunt does her character actually threaten forcible rape. This is how insane this “rape culture” bullshit is, that one of its own advocates can’t even get a rape threat correct.
LikeLike
I think that was on purpose, in case what did happen, happened. Enough to get the PC hand-wringing machine moving, but not so much that she couldn’t weasel out of a conviction. The worst they’ve got on her now is likely just making false statements in a police report (if there is one) and as rape cases show, the DA usually doesn’t do much. Even if, ironically, it’s big enough news that the DA feels forced to make her an example, she’ll just get it expunged later.
I see the page admin readily apologized like the dongle joke beta he is, and in response the offending “victim” called for a larger dialogue. Everything here was going according to script, I see. Never apologize to a feminist. Dongle joke betas buy the frame that it’s a simple matter of right and wrong but it’s really just trolling for a whipping boy for their personal grudge. So they don’t forgive. All they do is sense you’re a soft target and press the advantage.
LikeLike
[…] Another Whackjob Feminist Hate Crime Hoax […]
LikeLike
When the university leftists aren’t busy dreaming up words to describe the tiniest of microaggrievances…. they do this.
LikeLike
Oh dear. That’s embarrassing. And just a little cray cray. Okay a LOT cray cray.
LikeLike
Well, it’s what happens when people don’t have enough real problems.
LikeLike
http://takimag.com/article/where_the_men_are_john_derbyshire/print#axzz2S7FjF9rh
LikeLike
Lion of the Manosphere
dig it
LikeLike
What a sad human being. Any predictions for when this feminist shit tide will turn?
I think it will turn, when all Men starts to fuck their women, like they were a King, fucking their Queen.
LikeLike
More like the king fucking his kitchen wench.
LikeLike
Nah… A true woman who dutifully serves her King, truly deserves a Royal Fucking
LikeLike
Dutiful service stops when the servant becomes the queen. Better keep her a servant, in fact demote her from the kitchen to the laundry to ensure your royal drawers are clean and soft.
LikeLike
Yeah, I think a lot of these feminists just don’t have a man who fucks them properly. That tends to drain a lot of anger and bitterness out of a woman…
Of course, that would require making some *effort* to be more attractive to men. It’s far easier to just project your frustration and inadequacy onto society at large…
LikeLike
And they direct that anger and bitterness towards every aspect off their lives. Making them intolerable to talk to or be around. Why are they so hateful?
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Study in courtship.
LikeLike
This is why, as a rule, if it comes out of a woman’s mouth you have to question if; a) it actually happened, b) if it did happen, was it remotely like what she says it was, and c) if you have multiple men who saw it – you have to go by any of their versions as it will be closer to the truth, as long as they aren’t cops since they are PC as well.
Generally, the assumption that it’s a lie will be almost always closer to the truth if a woman says it. Of course, you can’t say that, even if it is a good place to start…
LikeLike
I think the muzzies with their requirement of three male witnesses are on to something.
LikeLike
The Scandinavians have an old proverb:
“Getting a man to tell the truth is like trying to catch a cuckoo in the woods… getting a woman to tell the truth is like trying to capture the echo of the cuckoo’s call.”
It sounds better in Swedish… sigh.
LikeLike
“….In a separate article, the Laramie Boomerang reported police obtained a warrant to search the student’s computer and found substantial evidence verifying that the offending Facebook post came from Lanker-Simons’ computer, while the computer was in her possession.”
ATTENSHINZ ME PLEASE!!!!!!
LikeLike
Im a greater beta looking to become alpha. This blog is good but im not learning enough info on how to become alpha. I like the “alpha male power moves” article and need more similiar to that which can help me achieve alpha status. Is anyone aware of any pther websites or has some tips?
LikeLike
You can only get so much for free. Wait for the book, or check out the list of fundamental guides
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/03/23/game-resources/
LikeLike
Girl has sex with a guy in an alley. Dates him for 3 weeks. 20 years later decides he’s a rapist http://herbsandhags.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/how-i-became-rape-victim.html
LikeLike
This is the problem with the (real) cultural narrative in the West; this girl was clearly uncomfortable and has no reasonable, realistic outlet for that. She clearly feels violated. Not all women are good at being forceful (no matter what the femcunts like to say, that’s a masculine personality trait). The guy sounds like an asshole. But instead of looking at her lapse in judgment as a lapse in judgment, she chooses to make it all his fault. Rape is the only tool on the table, so that’s what she’s using. I’d call it unbelievable, but I know a lot of girls who’d tell the same story.
LikeLike
Vonnegut nailed it a long time ago in “Harrison Bergeron”. The Handicapper General was named Diana Moon-Glampers. Ugh, with these three-named bitches.
LikeLike
There is a larger lesson here that this blog should consider writing about: avoid fatties at all costs. They’ll cause you trouble — beyond the trouble of having to look at them, that is.
Why? Because they have nothing going in in their lives since people avoid them, and because of that they’ll drum up problems for you because it gives them an emotional payoff. This goes for fat men too. Every fatass I’ve ever known has lived and died by the gossip mill or rumor mill. They live to see everyone get all riled up because they’re jealous of normal-weighted people. This woman’s blog post is one example, but I know people at work who made offhand comments to fat pigs, only to have their words twisted and come around to haunt them. Do good-looking women do this? For the most part, no, because they have lives and are too busy to hatch revenge schemes or stir up rumors on a mega-level.
One final thing: by “fatties” I mean the chunkers who were left out of all the action in school, NOT the guy or gal who put on a few pounds in middle age but was otherwise normal.
LikeLike
Meh, I don’t know. The amount of drama my ex created in my previous relationship was positively correlated to her waist size. the fatter she got, the “problems” she suddenly have with me… and he friends, family and co-workers.
LikeLike
”Yes, but only because she deserves a bon voyage bang before hitting the wall, which is coming soon. RT: WYB? ow.ly/kuvFC 25 minutes ago”
There is so much hatred in your heart, CH.
[CH: There is, but there is also so much love in my heart. Those who hate abundantly, love abundantly. It is the cycle of betrayal, renewal, hope and cynicism. It is living with demands rather than dying with acceptance. It is… more human than human.]
LikeLike
Oh, I like that… best CH retort ever.
LikeLike
Except that I don’t understand it. Anyway, I will keep fighting for his mental health if he is willing to talk to me.
[CH: Aren’t you 30 and still a virgin? If you want to fight for mental health, perhaps you should start with your own.]
LikeLike
I’m wondering. Do you actually believe the pseudo-profound nostrums you are peddling, or do you only practice it on the weak-minded (i.e., women)? Or have you been shilling this stuff so long that you have come to believe it through intimacy plus repetition?
Hatred is undiscipline, passion overcompensating for weakness. I am indifferent to plenty; I hate no one. I criticize fools, but I pity their condition more than I can get exercised over it. They can be annoying and persistent like gnats, but who gets worked up about pests? You deal with them rather than whine about them. It’s not personal, that’s how they and I were each made, one needling for attention, the other exterminating for effect (to the satisfaction of both parties). Those who expend energy on expressing hatred have no recourse to neutralize what irks them. So they let it out in the catharsis of emotion.
Love is an action, not a sentiment or a feeling. The opposite of love is not hatred but indifference.
There are deeper philosophies than Rob Zombie’s. Sure, the girls will moisten at Hallmark Cards, Fortune Cookies, and Astrology, so do your magic mind-reading. But this is still a gathering of men here, right?
Matt
LikeLike
You’re right, of course, but….
I think the actor’s dialog was for the benefit of the given audience… and in that instance, it was superb.
He turned Maya’s attempt at shaming into jolly plumage in his own cap.
LikeLike
Yes. More power to that.
But there’s the good possibility that he is getting too used to his own bullshit, because it works like magic on the daft sex. He’s relied on it so long he thinks it smells like roses. The men present are just wondering what he stepped in.
LikeLike
Yes, but the flowery hyperbole is just part of his writing style. Occasionally it makes me cringe and think he needs a good editor, but he makes enough incisive points and strokes of literary genius that it all balances out. I mean we’re all still here, right?
LikeLike
What are you talking about? Maybe you should just read it more carefully. I also did not understand it at first and I was writing stupid, aggressive and pathetic comments (I hope he won’t post them). Heartiste’s texts are not always so simple and sometimes you need to read it twice and think about it for a while. That’s what I think he thought …
“There is, but there is also so much love in my heart. Those who hate abundantly, love abundantly.”
—> I think he wanted to say that his emotions are very intense.
He’s a hopeless romantic and sometimes he’s a victim of his own emotions and he can’t do anything about it. Also, we all know that if your emotions are very deep and strong, you can’t just choose to only feel the positive ones – all of your emotions will be very strong. (Me and CH are very similar in this aspect of our personalities)
“It is the cycle of betrayal, renewal, hope and cynicism.”
—> Here I think he was talking about how us humans react to betrayal – at first, we still have hope, we still believe in the essential goodness of human nature and we try again but later, we become cynical and numb. But the cycle repeats over and over again because we never completely lose our hope and we always give in and renew our hope just to be disappointed again.
“It is living with demands rather than dying with acceptance.
—> Again, he is talking about hope and our human nature.
“It is… more human than human.”
—> ❤
LikeLike
Q.E.D.
LikeLike
Hey, we all could use a good editor. Of course he gets points for insight no matter how it’s expressed. And his expression style is remarkable even without editing. Unfiltered stream of consciousness goes with the blogosphere territory.
But this isn’t about style. My criticism is over substance. Nonsense is nonsense, and a gifted pen often transforms risible bullshit into the stuff 75% of readers will swallow without a second thought. In that way, prose artistry often handicaps a man’s analysis by inviting laziness: the artist knows he can get away with anything, so he doesn’t have to think as hard before pressing “publish.”
I speak from experience and wish I had more honest critics myself.
Matt
LikeLike
“But there’s the good possibility that he is getting too used to his own bullshit, because it works like magic on the daft sex. He’s relied on it so long he thinks it smells like roses.”
It does smell like roses. Women are attracted to men who are passionate and sincere. Sorry, preaching about love being an action and hatred undiscipline is a fantastic example of anti-game.
LikeLike
“Hatred is undiscipline, passion overcompensating for weakness.”
Nope, hatred is a very basic human emotion, similar to anger. It might be overcompensation for weakness sometimes, but that’s how our brain is built.
”Love is an action, not a sentiment or a feeling.”
Love is a consequence of ”being in love”, it is not an action because an action is something you can make yourself do. You can’t make yourself love someone you don’t love.
CH is a very sincere and intense person and maybe that’s the reason why you are attracted to his blog. He loves and hates freely and that’s something you are unable to allow yourself to do. Instead of making rationalizations about how “hatred is undiscipline” and “love is an action” you should rather listen to your own heart and allow yourself to feel what you really feel.
LikeLike
I always pictured you as Eurotrash with long chestnut hair, though, not spiky flaxen short.
Lady, speak for yourself. I not only understood it upon the first read, I understood what he was trying to do with you by saying it. Ten or twelve steps ahead. I don’t react emotionally, I analyze. It helps me transcend the mental and spiritual and social cul-de-sacs in which you’ve been spinning for years now.
Matt
LikeLike
I’m sorry you had to call me Eurotrash. You were trying to insult Heartiste and you said that his words are “bullshit”. Did you expect I will put up calmly with this?
“I not only understood it upon the first read, I understood what he was trying to do with you by saying it.”
Apparently you didn’t.
“I don’t react emotionally, I analyze.”
Same here.
“It helps me transcend the mental and spiritual and social cul-de-sacs in which you’ve been spinning for years now.”
Being in love with someone is mental, spiritual and social cul-de-sac?
LikeLike
And so we come full circle. You only have faint intimations of what “love” means.
You are not in love. You are overindulging a girly fantasy that enervates you while the last sands of your prime slip through the hourglass. You don’t live on this planet. You live inside your head, and this glowing interface indulges your solipsism.
If you had followed my advice years ago, you would have fashioned a rough-and-ready alpha by now out of beta clay. You would be bouncing his baby boy on your knee, and the weird fixations of your online existence would have faded to nothing. Instead you subsist on the crumbs of attention dropped by a surreal, faint-outline of a figure a universe away rather than embracing life and all its disappointments and glories.
You are the tragedy of a grown woman without a father to teach you or to guide you or to set you on the right path. So you fashion alpha out of stray pixels and synapses rather than flesh and blood and bone. I do pity you, and I pray for you.
The appeal of European women — particularly the Eastern European variety — to American men is their underappreciation of their assets. With just a little practical guidance, you could have leveraged that handsomely by now. Your English is superb. You weren’t abused by the carousel. You were young enough. But you undervalued yourself on the real meat market like most of your sisters do, and you retreated to virtual space, where you could get momentary attention from virtual alphas. You sullied yourself in search of the proverbial Five Minutes, and you settled for five seconds, given in micro-increments in [bold typeface].
Love means giving yourself away with no anticipation of anything in return. If you loved CH truly you never would have wrecked yourself on expectation, much less an expectation that could never be fulfilled. You would have given yourself to the ones around you, not for what you got back, but for their ability to receive what you were giving. Instead you squandered your affections on an inhuman virtual persona which by definition could never receive the love you had for it.
Matt
LikeLike
Matt,
thank you for this:
“Love means giving yourself away with no anticipation of anything in return. If you loved CH truly you never would have wrecked yourself on expectation, much less an expectation that could never be fulfilled. You would have given yourself to the ones around you, not for what you got back, but for their ability to receive what you were giving.”
It’s so beautiful! I will copy/paste it somewhere to not forget it. Especially the last sentence!
LikeLike
I hope that President Obama has been made aware of this tragedy so that he can blame the NRA, guns, sexism, racism and Islamophobia for the unfortunate sexual assault of this fine female specimen.
The only solution is to enact comprehensive immigration reform so that we can bring in more people to do the jobs Americans won’t do – namely, please fat chicks.
LikeLike
The only solution is to enact comprehensive immigration reform so that we can bring in more people to do the jobs Americans won’t do – namely, please fat chicks.
Only so many black dudes to go around.
If the tards in Congress do manage to open the floodgates, expect to see more American men humping immigrant women and leaving fatties even worse off than before. From what I can tell about the bill, it would flood the country with Asians and Latinos, and actually lower immigration from Africa by repealing the diversity visa.
Hey, gotta look at the bright side.
LikeLike
Her post-hoc justification will be: “who cares if it wasn’t actually true, it started ‘an important dialogue’ “.
LikeLike
Hate fucking is not rape.
LikeLike
What kind of sicko does something like this?
LikeLike
Zoophiliacs need loving too, apparently.
LikeLike
If someone actually raped this land beast, I’d say HE was the survivor.
LikeLike
Or he was the victim.
LikeLike
“When living in La-La Land goes wrong”
lolololol men aren’t as expendable as you thought they were anymore, huh?
LikeLike
Lol and what kind of a man would type that? Women are terrible actors, outside of the ones that take professional acting classes. Ego, emotion and entitlement are a triple threat of inhibitors
LikeLike
The statement from the university is not surprising to me:
Ignore the hoax, its impact and go on as if it never happened.
In some peoples mind false claims should have no barring on the believability of future victims and no doubt should come upon someone who throws out an accusation.
LikeLike
Has there ever been a “hate crime” that didn’t turn out to be a hoax? This one remains my personal favorite.
LikeLike
You’d almost think that what most feminists really crave is romantic attention from strong-willed, unapologetically sexist men who would throw them around in bed like ragdolls if they didn’t weigh 200 pounds, rather than the feeble, teary-eyed, obsequious cloying attention they actually get from the manboobs orbiting them like sad, defunct satellites.””””””’
yea if that chick jumped off the picnic table and expected me to catch her I might have to just move
LikeLike
OT:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archbishop-prays-while-topless-gay-activists-shout-curses-and-douse-him-wit
LikeLike
John Derbyshire just named you “the lion of the manosphere”. Check his column in Taki.
LikeLike
Warren Buffett is bullish on women!!!!!!!
http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/02/leadership/warren-buffett-women.pr.fortune/index.html
Some choice portionzzzzzzlolzzz
“Resistance among the powerful is natural when change clashes with their self-interest. Business, politics, and, yes, religions provide many examples of such defensive behavior. After all, who wants to double the number of competitors for top positions?”
AND
Still an obstacle remains: Too many women continue to impose limitations on themselves, talking themselves out of achieving their potential. Here, too, I have had some firsthand experience.
AND
I’m happy to say that funhouse mirrors are becoming less common among the women I meet. Try putting one in front of my daughter. She’ll just laugh and smash it. Women should never forget that it is common for powerful and seemingly self-assured males to have more than a bit of the Wizard of Oz in them. Pull the curtain aside, and you’ll often discover they are not supermen after all. (Just ask their wives!)
So, my fellow males, what’s in this for us? Why should we care whether the remaining barriers facing women are dismantled and the fun-house mirrors junked? Never mind that I believe the ethical case in itself is compelling. Let’s look instead to your self-interest.
AND
Fellow males, get onboard. The closer that America comes to fully employing the talents of all its citizens, the greater its output of goods and services will be. We’ve seen what can be accomplished when we use 50% of our human capacity. If you visualize what 100% can do, you’ll join me as an unbridled optimist about America’s future
Greatest beta: this is equalism run amok….NO MENTION WHATSOEVER OF THE BIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES AND REALITIES BETWEEN THE TWO SEXES. GBFM beta bucks is what this is all about. The wall street masters want us all to work work work forget the family, seperate homes means two tvs, two irons, two sets of washers and dryers always more more more.
No mention of female hypergamyyyy LOL if only buffet knew but what does he care he is one of the wealthiest men in the world…
LikeLike
You can tell just by her text that no conservative man wrote that. Any time I see or hear the word “hatefuck,” I already know that I am not dealing with a conservative. For whatever reason, that particular verb seems to be a shibboleth of the Left (and they seem to reserve it for Michelle Malkin, Sarah Palin, and Ann Coulter).
Conservative men can indeed be crude on occasion, but I’ve never heard one say “hatefuck.” Instead, they’ll say things like, “Boy, I really can’t stand her politics, but I’d hit it.”
LikeLike
Nice observation. The average conservative is indeed pretty lame.
LikeLike
Speaking as a consie, I don’t actually hate anybody. Attractive stupid SWPL women? Nah. Despise, certainly, if their politics are atrociously bad, and I am indeed prone to Schadenfreude. Actual HATE, though, seems to be the domain of leftoids.
LikeLike
RT: WYB? ow.ly/kuvFC 25 minutes ago”
Someone please translate this into English for me, please.
LikeLike
Lame.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/education/university/uw-madison-looking-into-claims-students-disrupted-vagina-monologues/article_fe2c5d72-348a-575f-b5a6-9d6cac7d3139.html
LikeLike
I think it’s somehow appropriate that it’s a sorority that’s being investigated for perpetrating said incident.
LikeLike
Makes sense. Girls in sororities are still selected on how hot and popular they are. It’s hilarious that they’re ragging on butthurt feminists.
LikeLike
Has anyone dug up the token picture of her posing with some overly processed, limited-edition bag of snack food?
LikeLike
I’m sure she just cried, deflected blame in another direction about how she’s “got some issues she’s working on” and “it won’t happen again” becuase now that she’s caught she “sees how she was the problem.” Nothing will change, just find a new victim to dump her emotional shit on. Rinse and repeat.
LikeLike
I work with an ex girlfriend. We dated years ago. Talk to her casually. Tell her story of how a mutual friend tried to seduce me one night. Watch her blood boil after 3 years being split up. For everything else, there’s Visa.
LikeLike