Dear Cutie-Pie (I call you this pet name because I subconsciously know how important your cuteness will eventually be to your future reproductive and marital success),
Recently, your mother and I were searching for an answer on the government spy agency known as Google. Halfway through entering the question, GovGoog returned a list of the most popular searches in the world. Minutes later, my tax return was flagged for auditing. Perched at the top of the search list was “How to keep him interested.”
It amused me. I scanned several of the countless articles about how to be sexy and sexual, when to bring him a beer versus a sandwich, and the ways to make him feel smart and superior.
And I got a knowing look.
Little One, it is, has always been, and always will be your job to “keep him interested.” Just at it will be your future husband’s job to keep you interested. Everyone knows this is true, despite loser mafia protestations to the contrary, and that’s why this search result, the culmination of millions of user search entries, is the first one returned.
Little One, your only task is to know deeply in your soul — in that unshakeable place that isn’t indoctrinated into feminism and resentment and mass media bromides — that you are judged for your worth. (If you can remember that everyone else is judged for their worth also, the battle of your happiness in life will be mostly won. But that is a letter for another day.)
If you can assess your worth in this way, you will be attractive in the most important sense of the word: you will work hard to stay fit and sexy and feminine and attract a boy who is both capable of self-assured masculinity and who wants to spend his one life not secretly despising you for giving up on him and disrespecting his normal, natural desires as a man.
Little One, I want to tell you about the man who doesn’t need to be kept interested, because he knows you’ve given up trying to be interesting:
I don’t care if he puts his elbows on the dinner table — because it’s worse when he puts his eyes on the way your nose scrunches like a walrus sniffing rotten fish in the air when you smile, and starts to hate you. And then can’t stop hating you.
I don’t care if he can’t play a bit of golf with me — because his short game suffers when he’s pissed off his children are ingrates trained by your passive-aggressive style of parenting to despise him and he’s not quite sure one of them is his. Sadly, his daughter is taking after you lengthwise and widthwise and you’re doing nothing to stop it because GRRLPOWER and PATRIARCHY.
I don’t care if he doesn’t follow his wallet — because the money just goes to buy you bon bons and cheesy poofs.
I don’t care if he is strong — because if he were strong he might trade you in for a woman who’s still interested in maintaining an hourglass figure and a sweet heart.
I couldn’t care less how he votes — because the sitting White House occupant is not the one who has to wake up every morning and see your flabby carcass rolling over to refuel with a strategically placed bowl of chips on the nightstand first thing in the morning.
I don’t care about the color of his skin — because your shelf butt is so stupendously grotesque my objections will only fall on deaf ears when you discover your own men don’t want to paint a canvas of your lives with brushstrokes of patience, and sacrifice, and vulnerability, and tenderness.
I don’t care if he was raised in this religion or that religion or militant Islam — as long as he was raised to value the sacred and to know every moment of life, and every moment of life with you, is deeply sacred assuming you wear the hijab and cover your bloated porcine face.
In the end, Little One, if you stumble across a man like that and he and I have nothing else in common, we will have the most important thing in common:
Your physical and temperamental attractiveness.
Because in the end, Little One, the things you should have to do to “keep him interested” are to be sexually experimental, fall within a 17 to 23 BMI and a 0.65 to 0.75 WHR, and treat him like the king he truly, deeply wants to be for you in your lives together.
Only then will you and he be happy and loving and patient and vulnerable and tender with each other.
Your eternally interested man (no creepy incest),
Daddy
***
This post is, of course, dedicated to my daughter, my Cutie-Pie. But I also want to dedicate it beyond her.
I wrote it for my wife, who has courageously held on to her slender figure and has always held me accountable to being that kind of “man” that women love — i.e., a man who doesn’t apologize for his desire.
I wrote it for every grown woman I have met inside and outside of my therapy office — the women who have never known this voice of a Strong Father.
And I wrote it for the generation of boys-becoming-manboobs who need to be reminded of what is really important — my little girl finding a loving, lifelong, alpha male companion who demands the best of her is dependent upon at least one of you figuring this out. I’m praying for you. No, seriously, I’m praying. Don’t let me down. I don’t want little manbooblets jerking off into furry costumes or little cuntlets blowing my savings on useless grad school Gay Studies degrees and bowing out at age 38 with an apartment full of cats and a womb drier than Death Valley (apropos).
***
This article has been featured on Huffington Post. CH is going mainstream!

Mainstream! Sheeeet . . . I wish, brother.
LikeLike
I’m crossing my fingers for you, Hearts. You are very admirable for always writing what you feel to be true instead of what will make you popular. But you deserve to be a famous writer. Plus, you can legitimately pick up hot young girls even into your 70s if you make a name for yourself as a writer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In other words, you want to fuck him. Not that I blame you. If I were a female I’d want to fuck him too. No homo heartiste
LikeLiked by 1 person
Meh. I’m 30. I gotta be in it to win it at this point. But if i were 20…
LikeLike
He has settled down into an XL LTR. Can’t you read between the lines? So much for female “intuition.”
LikeLike
XL: Extra large? Doesn’t seem right somehow 😉
LikeLike
Trojan Magnum XL. Better?
LikeLike
Yes, that does seem, er, fitting 😉
LikeLike
Kate, he always has sex on his mind lol. He ordered me to do Kegels and forbade me to touch. That should give you an idea.
LikeLike
Yes, yes, he can be very amusing. But you should be wary it doesn’t actually have an effect on you.
LikeLike
Well of course he has an effect…..duh 😉 How else could he be said to be running an eHerm and be tossing eFlirts at us groupies? Many have taken notice…….
LikeLike
I don’t count myself in that group. We are spiritual siblings, bound to praise and tell each other off for one another’s benefit. It is a privileged position.
LikeLike
Heh, you girls are funny!
LikeLike
Fooled you all. XL is roman numeral for 40. Interpret as you will.
LikeLike
LOL! Talk about [always making] “him feel smart and superior.” I think it’s what he needed to hear.
LikeLike
Huff Post: Yentas from Park Slope telling the world’s women how to live
LikeLike
The comments are gold. Two in a row said this:
And again.
Assuming your child will behave as humans have for the past few millions of years is apparently irrational and scares gay children. Best assume your child is gay, because when you hear hoof-beats in North America, you’d better assume it’s a
zebraunicorn.I’m putting $50 down that it turns out that all the kids this guy has are straight. It’s very rare I see a homo come from a family where the father is an alpha, the wife is a proper wife, and the house is in order. The cases where this does happen are given inordinate attention in the man-bites-dog news tradition. Almost all homos from normal families I can think of, I later realize are from movies and tv. Whoops.
I guess all the unhappy masses can do when they see a proud man raising his daughter right is to shake their flabby appendages and mumble from their slack-jawed mouths still bursting with sponge cakes that they hope he’s punished with offspring as fucked up as they are.
LikeLike
Hmm. I went from the post here to the comments there without reading the article there, not realizing this was another legendary work of CH satire. I should have been suspicious when the most agitated comments were from the liberally deranged above bemoaning the liberally deranged author wasn’t liberally deranged enough for their tastes.
True liberal reactions to the text above typically involve faces melting a la Raiders of the Lost Ark or spontaneous dissolution into puddles with pointed hats.
In my defense, more outright conservative stuff has made it onto HuffPo (Lookin atchu, Greg Gutfeld).
LikeLike
I find liberals’ urge to constantly bring up and defend faggotry, especially in situations where it should be irrelevant, to be rather creepy.
LikeLike
he didn’t cover the possibility that she identifies as male and only presents as female or any of the many other 100%-equally-valid-in-every-way paths of life. which, as is lost on huffpo readers, is the point. he doesn’t intend that for his daughter.
LikeLike
shit i really thought some of the ch stuff was in that article, i’m a horses’s hind end. only thing over there worth reading is kbkoolio. fuuuck.
then i went to lunch and saw a bunch of land-whale women in tank tops, that will likely get plowed this evening, and i wept into my napkin.
LikeLike
Yes, the more they try to convijce you that it is normal and healthy and worthy of celebration for a man to want to stick part of his body into the anus another sweaty hairy man, the more you relaize Something.Is.Fucked.Up.
LikeLike
Corvinus makes a good observation. For the liberal, fags always have to be included anytime sex is discussed. Fags can’t be left out on grounds that normal sex doesn’t affect them. Liberals desperately want to make fag sex normal. Soon, fag sex will be the norm, while all of us normal folks are going to be looked upon as archaic. It’s already happening at certain school districts in blue states.
LikeLike
libruls leftards righties. No more analysis needed, thank you very much. We have found simplicity and it saves a lot of work and analysis.
LikeLike
Best screen name
LikeLike
Accessing History data banks…
‘The love that dare not speak its name has become the love that won’t shut up — Robertson Davies.
LikeLike
One of my favorite quotes.
LikeLike
Read the huffing ton article again sir. It’s actually not the same as heartiste’s. I am joyful that the genius at huffing ton post is getting bashed by the gays whilst mr chateu will never have those type of crappy responses posted on this blog. We are the lucky ones who have found our own forum to do business in the intellectual and practical discussion sphere without having the losers, the annoying bitches, pipe in with their loser comments. God bless the truth, and the proper outlook on reality.
LikeLike
“It’s very rare I see a homo come from a family where the father is an alpha, the wife is a proper wife, and the house is in order.”
Exactly!!!
It hardly ever happens in traditional households. It usually happens in homes where the parents believe in “experimentation” and “open-mindedness,” which are nothing of the sort. It usually means liberal mumbo jumbo. It means shedding traditions and time-tested values and morals for progressive stupidity. It often happen in homes where the parents are still married, but they don’t have a traditional marriage and the mother works on a career while the kids get influence by their friends too much because of minimal parental supervision. All a vulnerable adolescent boy from such a family needs (to become homosexual), is an older kid that had homosexual experiences already convince him to experiment with him, or to get preyed on by a pederast.
LikeLike
No, Lily, gay kids are born by mothers who have already had too many boys.
Please investigate this a bit more. Zero tolerance here for ignorant proselytizing.
LikeLike
“No, Lily, gay kids are born by mothers who have already had too many boys.”
wtf? LOL!
Anyway, notice I didn’t say gay kids are usually the result of being raised by single mothers. I think it’s one thing we can’t blame on single moms raising kids without their children’s father. Usually, their children end up troubled kids involved with drugs, bad grades, and teenage sex.
Homosexuality is a diffident pathology. I know many here hate it when I go into my anti-gay spiel because they don’t believe that homosexuality is a learned behavior and a choice. BUT IT IS. It usually occurs in very open families where liberalism is the center, core, and essence of their values. It doesn’t occurs in families where the parents run a tight ship, the mother believes in traditional values, and an alpha father rules the roost. Even if this has not been conclusively proven (being that it’s a very unpopular thing to say), commonsense still makes it obvious.
Homosexuality is a blight of the left – take it or leave it, but it’s so. It happens more in liberal households and extra-permissive societies, than anywhere else.
LikeLike
And prison. Don’t forget prison. The fact that the population with the highest percentage of homosexuals is the prison population should speak to something. Poor mental state + narcissism + low time preference + lack of other options = homosexual behavior. Mix and match and to your suiting.
LikeLike
Spot on! Prison is a prime example that homosexuality is a choice. Another prime example is the ancient Greek culture. Most Greek men had adolescent boy lovers. Young boys were programed into homosexuality, they weren’t born that way. Pederasty – is an erotic homosexual relationship between an adult male and an adolescent male outside his immediate family. The ancient Greek culture embraced such relationships in its art, religion, and literature. The Bible is the first challenge to homosexuality in the world. Now we’re losing the fight because the ancient Biblical warning falls on deaf ears. We’ll lose our souls if we don’t win.
LikeLike
Lily, I can name at least seven gay people whom I’ve had the when-did-you-know-you-were-gay conversation with. All of them, minus one, knew from childhood. Three of them struggled to be straight but ended up cheating on their boyfriends/girlfriends with people of the same gender.
At least two of the seven come from traditional and conservative Virginia familes.
This is all anecdotal, of course. Still, my problem with your view isn’t that it’s “unpopular” — it’s that your viewpoint is just *wrong*.
You don’t sound like you’ve known or spoken to many homos. Go talk to some. They’ll tell you.
(waiting for the “Jason-is-gay” third-grade-level snark to drop in 3 … 2… 1…)
LikeLike
Here is where you go wrong, my dear Jason. You listen to what gays tell you about their CHOSEN behavior, and you believe them.
“I can name at least seven gay people whom I’ve had the when-did-you-know-you-were-gay conversation with. All of them, minus one, knew from childhood.”
Use your head man: what are they going to say? Are they going to say it’s a choice? The moment they admit it’s a choice, they lose the battle. They MUST claim they were born this way in order to be accepted by their families and their friends, and be looked upon with sympathy, as opposed to being lashed upon for their wanton sexuality. If you were gay, can you imagine your mom if you told her you liked fucking other guys because that’s what you’re used to ever since you sexually experimented with one of your guy friends? Or, are you going to tell her that you don’t want to hurt her but you have no choice about who you are, because that’s how God or Nature made you and you have no control over whom you’re attracted to? Once you remove the fault from yourself and throw it on God or Nature for making you fixed sexually, you garner sympathy since it’s beyond your control. This is bullshit; attraction is not something we can’t control. If a straight person ever made such a statement he’d be called an idiot. Of course we can all control who we want to have sex with. The problem is, after having sex only with other men, gays can’t get it up for a pussy no more. Gay sex becomes an acquired taste that you can’t shed.
Think about the past. No gay ever claimed he was born that way before the 1970s. Granted, the 1970s is an era way before our time, but if you read old psychology books and magazines (if you can find them), they devote a large portion to homosexuality being a pathological state by choice. They state it’s an acquired taste, brought about by early sexual experimentation in homosexuality. But today no psychology book will ever make such a statement because it’s considered quackery to do so, or worse, hate speech. Look how you called me “bizarro” because you don’t like my position on homosexuality, yet I called you no derogatory names. That’s how you liberals operate; you have no tolerance for facts or commonsense if it’s not something approved by the liberal establishment. Right now the liberal establishment says homosexuality is not a choice, therefore people like you will stop at nothing to make sure everyone gets it through their heads, or be chastised, or worse prosecuted for hate speech. That’s how fools like you do the liberal establishment’s bidding and it’s how dupes like you become their useful idiots.
LikeLike
All that means is you have an association bias toward homosexuals. Your anecdotes imply more about yourself than the state homosexuality.
LikeLike
“I can name at least seven gay people whom I’ve had the when-did-you-know-you-were-gay conversation with. All of them, minus one, knew from childhood.”
Here is where you go wrong, my dear Jason: You listen to gays telling you their CHOSEN behavior is not a choice, and you believe them.
Use your head: what are they going to say? Are they going to say it’s a choice? The moment they admit it’s a choice, they lose the battle. They MUST claim they were born this way in order to be accepted by their families and their friends, and be looked upon sympathetically, as opposed to being lashed upon for their wanton unnatural sexuality. If you were gay, can you imagine your mom when you told her you liked fucking other guys because that’s what you’re used to ever since you sexually experimented with one of your guy friends. Or, are you going to tell her that you don’t want to hurt her but you have no choice about who you are, because that’s how God or Nature made you and you have no control over whom you’re attracted to. Once you remove the fault from yourself and throw it on God or Nature for making you gay, you garner sympathy since it’s beyond your control. This is bullshit; attraction is not something we can’t control. If a straight person ever made such a statement he’d be laughed at. Of course we can all control who we want to have sex with. The problem is, after having sex only with other men, gays can’t get it up for a pussy no more. Gay sex becomes an acquired taste that you can’t shed once you’re used to it. It’s like the hot sluts who fucked alphas all through their 20s. Once they hit their 30s and their looks dissipate, it’s hard for them to settle for the beta who’s sexual style doesn’t thrill and excite them like the alpha did, and they can’t orgasm with their beta like they did with their alpha. Except unlike the gays who can continue to fuck gays, the sluts can’t continue to fuck their alphas; the decision is not in their hands. Frustration and resentment set in, and consequently a spiral of self-destructive behavior begins. Therefore, once a person is used to a certain sexual style or practice, it’s very hard to stop it. It becomes what turns him/her on, and what causes them to orgasm. Without these conditions being met, they cannot climax.
Think about the past. No gay ever claimed he was born that way before the 1970s. Granted, the 1970s is an era way before our time, but if you read old psychology books and magazines (if you can find them), they devote a large portion to homosexuality being a pathological state by choice. They state it’s an acquired taste, brought about by early sexual experimentation in homosexuality. But today no psychology book will ever make such a statement because it’s considered quackery to do so, or worse, hate speech. Look how you called me “bizarro,” because you don’t like my position on homosexuality, yet I called you no derogatory names. That’s how you liberals operate; you have no tolerance for facts or commonsense if it’s not something approved by the liberal establishment. Right now the liberal establishment says homosexuality is not a choice, it’s genetics. Therefore, people like you will stop at nothing to make sure everyone believes that, or be chastised, or worse prosecuted for hate speech. That’s how fools like you do the liberal establishment’s bidding and it’s how dupes like you become their useful idiots.
LikeLike
Be careful Lily…Jason is an alpha who likes to fight. He also apparently has first hand knowledge of how homos are created. No homo, brah.
LikeLike
Oh, Jason is cool. He is just liberal with wrong notions he picked up from his liberal indoctrination – something that effects most of us, I’m afraid. If you live in western society, it’s impossible not to be affected by liberalism. Maybe he’ll see the light someday. Meanwhile, let’s keep teaching him. I doubt that our comments haven’t influenced him in a positive way. I assume he was much more liberal before CH. Be patient with him 🙂
LikeLike
Nah, im not gonna call you gay, Jason. In all seriousness how old were these people when the knew they were gay?
LikeLike
Use a syllogism to make an argument, and I’ll listen to you.
LikeLike
in your case it’d be a syllo-jism.
LikeLike
Or a syllogasm.
LikeLike
In that case, gays would be rare in Western countries, where the average woman has two kids.
LikeLike
Corvinus, watch him backtrack now and claim it’s genetic. Wait, or would it be blankslate? Wait nevermind. I forgot those two terms are interchangeable.
LikeLike
You’re a goddamn fool. Practice your reading comprehension. They’re not interchangeable; they’re two halves of a full story.
Imbecile.
LikeLike
Two halves of a complete story huh? Go back and reread in your textbook the definition of blankslate.
LikeLike
You can only mock people if you demonstrate a thorough understanding of their beliefs.
You don’t demonstrate a thorough understanding of my beliefs.
Go back and read Neecy’s hilarious explanation to you using a peekaboo metaphor. Remember that? Go find it! Read it slowly, out loud, one syllable at a time, your finger tracing its way across the screen.
LikeLike
Fraternal birth order effect:
http://articles.latimes.com/2006/jun/27/science/sci-brothers27
LikeLike
Nah, I know a liberal nancy boy when I see one, Jason. I know your type. Typically against guns, ready to support gay marriage at a moments notice. Literally scared to death of offending minorities. Her peekaboo analogy was one of the dumbest things to ever come out of her mouth. I get the intended point. I really do. It’s just that it fails under scrutiny, and once the both of you were caught in an epistemological dilemma you backtracked and hoisted false flags. Your fallback position? “Well we can’t really know anything so we might as well just give up unless of course the sciences studies supports equalityisms lolz” No wonder you love Nicoles sterotypical mammy type personality. Where would a child be without his old mother hen?
You’re a faggot until you drop your lame ass attempt at being edgy and accept reality for the nastiness that it is. YOU need to pick a side, either science or mysticism. Trying to accomodate both to appeal to what makes you feel good makes Jason a dull boy.
LikeLike
Jesus h. Christ.
The LATimes???
Now I know why…
LikeLike
You haven’t read enough of my posts. Please stop trolling me.
I understand that every group needs a punching bag, but you’re literally making up shit about my beliefs. So does whorefinder, who’s a cretin, so I’m afraid you’re not much better.
Science v mysticism? WTF? We weren’t even talking about that. And you didn’t back me or anybody into an epistemological corner. But thanks for playing.
LikeLike
Hey jason, quit worrying about birth order etc. and if you don’t want to be a faggot, just keep dick out of your mouth. Problem solved. The secret to being straight is not fucking other men, what’s so hard to figure out?
LikeLike
Being a later child in a huge family may be a factor — one minor factor — but it doesn’t address the baseline percentage of 3%.
The average person in Western countries does not have many older brothers any more, perhaps one or two. Yet faggotry seems to be as common as it ever was, if not more so.
Here’s a different study. By the more-older-brothers hypothesis, which would correlate by definition with birth rates, Hispanics would be far more likely to be poofters, and Asians least likely. That’s not what we see. In fact, Asians actually outdo Hispanics in the polesmoking department.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220120/White-people-likely-gay-Huge-study-reveals-highest-proportion-homosexual-people-African-American-community.html
LikeLike
Agreed, corvinus, fraternal birth order effect is a small part of what constitutes homosexuality. But my point was that this portion of homosexuality is genetic, or at least hormonal in utero, and therefore can’t be explained away by radical fundamentalist bizarros like Lily.
I’d also like to point out that people on this website (and others) often make the nature v nurture choice based on their a priori prejudice. For example, Lily is happy to point a finger solely at environmental factors contributing to the creation of homosexuality, whereas many others take glee in pointing at HBD and genetic causes for racial differences/inferiority/what have you.
Meanwhile, I’ll sit here and just laugh at people who claim to have definitive answers in the nature/nurture split, since it’s so obvious, to my POV, that we are the product of both.
Once more: “Genetics loads the gun, and environment pulls the trigger.”
LikeLike
Patty, I’m afraid that in the arena of science, you are bringing a spork to a scalpel fight.
LikeLike
Never having seen surgeons wield the tools of their trade in anger, I’m betting Nicole knows far more about sporks.
Heard tell she managed to have sparks fly from her sporks at the last buffet.
LikeLike
Patty, you are a liberal nancyboy who wants an equalist utopia for pale people wherein its government over regulates sex and everything else.
Idealization and pedestalization of European women brought us feminism. Your failure to see that makes you the nancyboy.
LikeLike
Greg, generally when dudes and people participating in dude banter trade the odd barb, they’re less repetitive and catty about it.
Every time you ladies start self abusing about me, it feeds this masculine tendency I have to revel in the wails of the women of the vanquished. Calm down. Fan yourselves or something.
LikeLike
Heh, heh… you keep repeating your negro-babble and attempts at ball-cutting because you’ve convinced yourself… and are delusional enough to think additional repetition will convince others.
LikeLike
Yeah, and that’s why when you’re not even posting in the comments, I’m bringing you up.
No wait, that’s you gals.
LikeLike
Sometimes a given bulbous bete noire presents too large a target to ignore for long.
Although I will grant you, gentlemen shouldn’t shoot fish in a barrel.
LikeLike
Greg, I’m beginning to understand why you’re here. You need this blog more than anyone, and just don’t admit it.
You should know that sometimes I do play the irresistible target. I’m like the stone in the elder monk’s hand in _Kung Fu_, only the trick is not to grab it, but to resist.
Though not a feminist, I do on some level represent all the big, ugly, hostile women you encounter offline. I could even, as it was for my wannabe bully in high school, represent your mother. Your unresolved issues with them, you take out on me, to the point of attributing opinions to me that I clearly do not have, and have repeatedly stated and proven so.
There is this imaginary Nicole in your mind, and she is a scary monster that you waste thought on fighting, even when I am not around.
You should fix that because we are not monsters. We’re just women, and bonus some of the easiest women to handle for a guy with minimally sufficient masculinity.
LikeLike
So the youngest Baldwin brother is the gay one?
LikeLike
“No, Lily, gay kids are born by mothers who have already had too many boys.”
That might be on factor, but there might be others, such as some kind of pathogen.
LikeLike
That can’t be true. Your rewarmed leftist pabulum with a dash of red-pill for spice is tolerated. Q.E.D.
Is this your first time on the internet? If only syllogisms were acceptable, there would be only silence.
There is far more to the art of Rhetoric than simple syllogisms, Socrates. You cannot make general complaints about the absence of conversational standards. You have to create those standards through force of rhetoric, especially since whining makes you appear weak.
Socrates regularly embarrassed the Sophists through demonstration, not through appeals to an authority he hadn’t firmly established.
Matt
LikeLike
Oh, alphie… how doth they school ye? Let me count the ways…
LLOOZLZLZOZOZOZOZOZLZLZLZLZOZOLLL
I gave up on the snark hunter long ago… you guys will too.
LikeLike
Each and every day, a fag and a lesbian standing outside the office building where da Losats Cockas workz harasses and assaults da Losats Cockas and asks, “Do you have a minute to support gay rights?” And each and ever time this happens, Da Losats Cockas glares a hole through these queerz and says, “No and what you should be trying to do is support divorced heterosexual fathers’ rights.” This scene has occurred hundreds of times and will occur each and every time these imbeciles assault Da Losats Cockas on the my street.
LikeLike
People who refer to themselves in the third person should be shot immediately.
LikeLike
Karamazov, looks like they beat me to it. The minute I saw the actual article I came here to make a satirical comment about how regressive and homophobic it was to assume his daughter was straight. Oh well. You can’t beat the real thing.
LikeLike
Saw this too. It’s almost as if lefties are BEGGING for gay kids or something.
LikeLike
When will libs finally figure out that faggotry isn’t some one IS, it’s something one DOES.
LikeLike
Because then they would have to admit that some peoples are genetic degenerates and are worthy only of being selected against, something that hurts their deepest herb instinct to nurture and oppose all that is alpha. Ever notice the frothing hatred these Nancy boys view you with? Deep down they’re reacting to a threat.
LikeLike
Alpha males don’t destroy. Alpha males dominate.
There’s a difference, Einstein.
LikeLike
How would one dominate something one has no use for?
LikeLike
He came running when be heard his name.
LikeLike
Alphas certainly do destroy. To say otherwise is fucking retarded.
How can you even make that statement seriously?
LikeLike
Creative destruction. Schumpeter. Jason gets a cookie!
Not alpha:
These are omega dreams of alpha. The impotent dream of power as the vehicle for their wish fulfillment. This is the real meaning of “slave morality.”
Can’t you sense the faint dorkiness of the “Evil is Kewl” crowd? A touch of “doth protest too much” in their obsessive worship of a power they don’t possess? There’s a reason for that.
Matt
LikeLike
Anti-whites dominate mass media.
LikeLike
Destruction, Domination, Procreation, and Creation. All alpha traits.
Genghis Khan was born in Mongolia around the 1155. He married at age 16, but had many wives during his lifetime. At 20, he began building a large army with the intent to destroy individual tribes in Northeast Asia and unite them under his rule. He was successful – the Mongol Empire was the largest empire in the world before the British Empire and lasted well after his own death.
LikeLike
None of you understand.
Alpha males dominate whatever they’re doing. Some of them use murder and destruction and rape (Khan); others use charm, shrewdness, and intelligence (Bill Clinton, like it or not); still others use daring physical accomplishments (Phillipe Petit).
But they all dominate.
Violence is only one tool. If you’ve ever seen a bar fight between two really drunk guys, then you HAVEN’T seen an alpha. In this day and age, alphas avoid violence unless they absolutely need it. See martial artists.
LikeLike
Now you see what I was originally saying, Jason. Needless destruction for destructions sake is like Matt said, a grossly over imagined fantasy of total power. The lust for control is so underfed in some individuals tbat desperation gets the better of them, much like a sex starbed guy settling for an ugly fat girl. Any port in a storm….
Some genes are detrimental to society at large and we would be better off without them. Make of that what you will.
LikeLike
You could also use the example of a powerless, decultured “white” man clinging to his paleness as proof of superiority in the absence of at least domination.
You believe in this ideology of unearned entitlement because you are desperate for some justification for your continued existence, and acceptance from your similarly complexioned peers, and figure ranting about how you’re not getting what you deserve is going to help.
Then you treat people who simply inform you that if you want to dominate, you must enter the fray like everyone else who wants to achieve a higher status or maintain their status, and take the risks, like they’re insulting you.
I feel your pain, Patty. There was a time in my life long ago when I thought to myself, “Why do these people want to hurt me all the time? They should…they should…they should…” and then I realized I had to deal with what is. When I did that, my life improved. Every lesson I get in that, my life has improved.
You will be less desperate and dependent on dreams of approval based on something irrelevant when you stop trying to fight reality.
LikeLike
On that note,
Fight Club: Alpha or Beta?
LikeLike
Nicole, it isn’t just the pale skin. It’s the culture that comes with it. Believe me, the greatest threat to the white man is his fellow white man and the hordes of liberal minded minorities who champion his cause in an attempt to dethrone western civilization. It isn’t a point of sitting back qnd saying “I am white. My rightful place is at ths helm of the world.”
It is “I am white. My rightful place is at the helm of the earth as an inheritance from my anscestors. How do I mainstain that position when half of my genetic family has forsaken their inheritance for a season of pleasure.”
LikeLike
Fight Club? Some interesting points… nay, jabs… at modern Western Culture.
But at the end of the day, meh… neurotic, nihilistic, and (dare I say) homo-agendized clap-trap.
LikeLike
It’s the “look at me, look at me, my son is a cock goblin we are so oppressed, you cannot imagine our daily struggle” mentality in one aspect. In todays world everyone aspires to be a victim of some sort. We live in the age of victimization.
LikeLike
Bingo.
LikeLike
You ever see the gleam in the eyes of a leftist when dealing with an elderly family member or a retarded child, or worse, an adopted retarded child from a third world country?! Having someone who cannot exist apart from their smug condescending watchful care is their wet dream incarnate. No wonder they invest so much in keeping minorities as victims, like a social epidemic of Maunchausens Syndrome.
LikeLike
It’s a sick, twisted version of Christian humanitarianism taken to absurd extremes.
LikeLike
You’re on fire today. As a woman of colour (ha!) I absolutely despise white liberals’ attempts to speak for me and dictate what I need. Although my views are mostly libertarian, I naturally get along better with conservatives because at least they don’t do the whole self-righteous paternalism thing and assume they know how I’m voting.
LikeLike
Great!
LikeLike
This is the problem with being a leftoid: it’s never enough. If you profess a prog. philosophy of raising your children, someone will denounce you for not going far enough, or for failing to acknowledge some other pet cause.
And eventually you have to decide how far down the liberal full retard path you want to go vs. when to quietly opt for what Larry Auster coined “the unprincipled exception.” The poor dope just wanted his daughter to be a power grrrrl, not lesbian
LikeLike
Precisely right.
Puritanical witch hunts happen amongst progressives all the time. If you disagree with any of their -isms, you’d be an outcast in a second.
LikeLike
But this is true of any herd. It doesn’t matter what they call themselves. If an ideology takes hold in a large enough or powerful enough group, they attempt to enforce it on everyone else.
This is why I prefer to live in the realm of should than is. If either of the current streams “wins”, independent and critical thinkers are screwed. Either way, there is a struggle against the extremism that is part and parcel in entitlement ideologies.
People who would attempt to eliminate or exterminate Gays are hypocrites if they take offense at Gays attempting to simply prevent them from gaining enough influence to do so. It is self defense using whatever tools are at their disposal, which are at the moment, influence and psychos who prove their point by running around killing people for their orientation.
LikeLike
Notice the usual aesthetic prop used in the article as well… the darling little blonde angel… nothing else tugs so at the heart strings. 😉
LikeLike
It’s reminiscent of dating a little cutie only to finally meet her father and see first hand how truly close to incestous some fathers act towards their own daughters. You start to believe his hatred towards you is born from jealousy thinly veiled in parenting.
LikeLike
@Patriarch–wow, I thought I was the only one who had experienced that. How common do you think that is?
LikeLike
From what I see, pretty common man. The hotter the girl the worse it is. The hottest girl I was ever with was a cute five foot two curly natural redhead with big hazel speckled eyes, large pouty lips and all the curves a feminist hates. Her old man hated me out of the gate. He was always touching her and having her (age 21) sit on his lap and such. Very weird. It would be interesting if anyone else with any experience in this would chime in.
LikeLike
My dad was the opposite. He stopped hugging me when I went through puberty and grew large breasts.
LikeLike
I dated a girl who went on “dates” (that’s what they called them) with her dad. I’m all for some quality time with the people who raised you but it seemed like he was trying to compete with me. It was a bizarre situation.
LikeLike
My father basically raised me as a boy, because he was so skeeved out by his father’s pseudo-incestuous “daddy’s little girl” nonsense with his own daughter. And my aunt grew up exactly like you’d expect – a fat, spoiled, self-absorbed, hypergamous ’50 Shades of Grey’ reading idiot who cheated on my (upstanding, hard working) uncle with two different men because she was soooo unhaaaaappy. A lot of dads don’t realize raising a good woman is actually harder in this day and age than raising a good man.
LikeLike
I had actually switched over to the Huffington Post site and assumed that CH’s edited version was the one on the site (somehow). I read the comments and thought they were all refrencing the edited version and some faith in our western future was restored. Then…I read the actual article…
LikeLike
That huffpo article is pure unadulterated feminist drivel. Summarized, it would go something like
“It is not your duty to keep your man interested, but it is his duty to keep you and the children happy and entertained. Basically, he has to put in all the work in a relationship where he has everything to lose”
Someone’s in for a rude awakening. Poor cutie pie
LikeLike
In other words, the man is your slave
LikeLike
If CH and the Manosphere ever went mainstream…it would make me re-evaluate the validity of our convictions.
LikeLike
Good point.
LikeLike
the letter to my son –
dear son… keep away from internet porn
LikeLike
And American women. Especially internet porn that features american whores.
LikeLike
I see what you did there.
LikeLike
“and he’s not quite sure one of them is his.”
LOL! So his daughter is a whorish wench?
“and every moment of life with you, is deeply sacred assuming you wear the hijab and cover your bloated porcine face.”
And she converted to Islam too?
I see this is taking the turn of most women these days. This “little one” is not so innocent 😆
“because the sitting White House occupant is not the one who has to wake up every morning and see your flabby carcass rolling over to refuel with a strategically placed bowl of chips on the nightstand first thing in the morning.”
Don’t tell me, she is a fat cow on top of her whorishness and her Islamization. I give up. What a blight!
LikeLike
Implying muslims aren’t basically like Christians. Implying that islamized girls aren’t unlikely to become whores. Implying there is anything wrong with being a muslim.
LikeLike
“Implying muslims aren’t basically like Christians.”
Yes, because Christians are the ones doing the bombings and implementing Sharia law in their neighbourhoods…
LikeLike
“TIller the Baby Killer”? No?
LikeLike
She’s just a human who happens to be female, who happens to muslim identify, who happens to be kinda whorey. It all “just happens”.
LikeLike
In the original article the pic of the little girl is so cute, although I know she’s not really the author’s daughter, who btw is a complete beta with beta notions. CH, how can you bring yourself to turn her into an Islamized fat-heifer, who turned the kids into disobedient disrespectful losers because she’s an idiot who can’t raise them right, and who probably cheated on hubby before she got fat?
Ha ha….so cruel to little innocent ones.
LikeLike
The author reminds me of Hugs somehow.
LikeLike
Beta, manboob, loser. We save a lot of analysis and boring reading by old guys there too. See, we can all just the same words, and we know we’re alike and don’t have to really think too much!! 😉
LikeLike
I’m sure you have your own pejoratives about us which you use among like minded acquaintences to identify one another and to simplify communication. We identify one another by how much we value masculinity and classical liberal thinking versus Marxist fairy tales.
LikeLike
Mmm.. the taste of butthurt.
LikeLike
Schmeckelhead, jerk-off, dill weed, dweeb.
How’s them words for ya, Mass-Transit Onan?
LikeLike
“Mass-Transit Onan”
So Biblical, with a technological twist at that.
LikeLike
I am a master of all disciplines.
LikeLike
what is the best manosphere resource for bar/club game? specifically, opening sets with 8’s and 9’s in a high end bar/club?
LikeLike
maybe try KrauserPUA, or RSD if you can get past the cheesy amateur hour web design
LikeLike
Mystery, Sixty, Roosh, RSD… Take yer pick
LikeLike
Mystery Method or Magic Bullets for a briefer version of MM.
Other methods get results in lots of environments and circumstances but when you’re talking high-end girls in high-end enviros who are surrounded by high-end guys and social circles, MMs group theory, social proof, merging sets forward, etc is prime.
You can run aggressive direct RSD game on a 6 at a meat market club. And you can run chill comfort building small-talk game on a 9 in a bookstore in the daytime. But on a 9 in a high-end club, her 10 orbiter chodes who don’t leave her side all night as they promise to take her on free trips to the bahamas on their private jets and protective sometimes drama girlfriends will jump in to cockblock or prevent you from even getting access TO her in the first place. You need to be able to win them over as well as her.
LikeLike
(also this is why I think the ultimate combo to study is MM and RSD…MM teaches you to work the room to create opportunities where you can use RSD style to take over once you have the opportunities. It’s like MM is an overall fight strategy to open up the other fighter for attacks and RSD is the fighter’s actual punching skills)
LikeLike
I appreciate the comments. I feel that many of the Chateua’s followers have graduated to more advanced game such as LTR, juggling a harem, or in this case cracking elite markets. It would be great to hear more on these topics.
LikeLike
LikeLike
You are awesome at taking down sixes.
LikeLike
That’s not me if you thought it was….
LikeLike
haha. Iceman that’s funny. Interesting post. A lot of truth in it.
LikeLike
I hope I don’t have a daughter, and if I do… I’ll make her read this.
LikeLike
Not Alpha Dad to Daughter, but RSDTyler has some ~similarly good words for women:
YouTube, rsdfreetour-“What I’d Do To Lock Down A Successful Guy If I Was A Woman — And Where Club Addicted Girls Go Wrong”,
LikeLike
Good to see him realize more red pill wisdom.
LikeLike
lol it was legitimately weird to see an RSD vid posted that I didn’t post. I scrolled past and was like “wait, what? Did I post this while I was drunk or something?” lol that was trippy.
Also this is a super solid video. The point he makes about a girl’s “earning potential” VS a guy’s is huge and really makes me shake my head at girls who don’t take care of their bodies/looks.
LikeLike
not too bad, but he notably doesn’t mention anything at all about limiting how many cocks she takes. non-judgmentalism aside, men with options really don’t date girls who have been dicked by all of NY, simply because they don’t have to.
LikeLike
@Lemon
I’m alright with a girl who’s turned down 10,000 guys for sex:
If you want to get your panties in a twist over whether she’s only turned down 9,970 guys or 9,997 guys, you do your thing lol Of course you’ll never really know how many she’s fucked because she won’t tell you when she picks up that you’ll judge her for it. I’d rather know what I’m getting into, personally.
LikeLike
LOL! He’s talking about YaReally’s barslut psychos – drinking, drugging, clubbing, whoring, not exercising and eating like shit. Of course, they are easy to bed, and they end up looking tired, used and abused, by the time they’re 25. Ladies – if you spend your nights in bars – drinking alcohol, doing coke, smoking, and fucking different guys – of course you’ll end up old and decrepit and bitter. And, once your looks fade, you’ll have nothing to bargain with. The girls that don’t know this are stupid. kind of reminds me of the med student form the “should you stay or should you go” thread.
Yeahokcool, how does it feel to be proven wrong by Tyler from all people?
That said, once I used to think Tyler was one of those PUA clowns. But lately I have become a fan of his because of his straight talk. If you forgive his theatrics, his streetish/cartoonish attire, and his shrill voice (which isn’t alpha at all, lol), he makes a lot of sense. He’s one example of not judging a book by its cover. In this video he describes party girls very well – the exact way they really are and behave. And, he also describes very accurately how they’ll end their party-girl career in a lackluster manner. One day, they’ll cease to shine, cease to be the “It girl,” and then what. Disaster – bitter, angry, frustrated, bitchy, hateful, or marrying for the wrong reason a beta male just to divorce him in a couple of years, take half his net worth, take his kids, and raise them as a single frustrated angry bitch fat-cow single mom and turn them into complete losers. The end result: No one is happy – not the women, not the men, and not their kids who end up suffering the most. This is happening all over the West, not just America. The West is a very unhappy society, because the traditional family unit has been destroyed. People’s careers and achievements don’t keep them warm at night. People’s happiness stems more from finding a suitable mate and raising good healthy families.
LikeLike
“One day, they’ll cease to shine, cease to be the “It girl,” and then what”
…you and your collection of cats will cackle at their misfortune? You’ve got a lot of bitterness pent up lol must’ve been a fatty in high school.
P.S. have a gym bunny who works out 6 days a week and doesn’t drink alcohol coming over tomorrow. U mad? lol
LikeLike
U MAD BRO? xD xD xD xD
i cant resist blurting out my awesome gym line (flexes fatceps) xD
LikeLike
The garden of modern American femininity is overgrown with slutweed, a direct result of weak fathers who refused to tear up such behavior by its root, early – when it would have had the best and longest lasting effect.
Instead, these fathers decided to tend the slutweed as though it was no different than a valuable flower.
LikeLike
I like pulling slutweeds in the club, then pulling their slutweed hair in my bed.
LikeLike
Accessing Statistics data banks…
Dude have you seen the divorce stats? Most of these Fathers aren’t even at Home! It is impossible to nip the slutweed in the bud when one is limited to visitation like 2 days a week!
Every time I watch some horrible reality show or see some horrible news story on the boo-tube where a young woman (Millenial) is acting horribly there is NEVER a father anywhere in the background… and I know plenty of real life slutweeds who have fit the same profile!
LikeLike
I haven’t been able to cold approach for the last few weeks, so I’ve just been doing the whole online game thing. It’s actually hilarious….like…(for me) 10 times more difficult to get anything going than in reality. I’m kind of lost, because I’ve actually tried several of the PUA recommended online openers blah blah blah…and I just think they’re for d00dz (esp online) who just naturally, through photos, are higher value.
So…….I’m just going to start sending increasingly offensive messages.
I get a lot of profile views, but no messages/responses. So, that leads me to believe they look at my height and just do the typical online ‘whatever’ thing.
Anyway, this is the only real practice I’m going to get for another week when all my school shit and whatever is over. Any suggestions, tips on what kinds of messages get an emotional reaction appreciated.
LikeLike
Don’t forget the best opener, “I am a god”
LikeLike
“So, that leads me to believe they look at my height and just do the typical online ‘whatever’ thing.”
This is what’s happening. I would recommend changing your height to 5’9″ (not so tall that you get a skewed advantage but not short enough that they’ll “insta-reject” you based on their nom-emotional laundry checklist of features they expect) and just using online purely as practice at escalating, teasing, getting titty pics etc but never meet up with them (since the 5’9″ would be a lie lol)
Guaranteed a lot of those chicks would love you if you met them in person at the bar on a charismatic night and not give a shit about your height as you feed them emotions. But the reality is with online game that they can go “filter my results for no one under 6’2″” and never get to experience your personality that would woo them.
So ya, I say lie about your height but keep everything else the same, and use them purely as practice while you’re stuck inside. Then when you’re done exams etc you can get back to hitting up girls in real life where your personality gets them and you can apply some of the online txting stuff you learned toward the girls you meet in person when you get their #s. 🙂
LikeLike
Or one can simply double down and lie even if you plan on meeting them, and if they actually notice the discrepency after being exposed to your winning personality and say “You lied about your height!!”, say “Aren’t you glad I did?” Chicks also tend to add an inch or two to their height online and/or honestly think they are taller than they actually are.
LikeLike
I’m torn between just lying and doing ‘practice’ or whatever, or just pushing it to see what someone like ME would have to type/do to MAKE someone on the other end of the computer HAVE to type something back.
LikeLike
Someones getting broody. I slept with well over 100 women. I have had a child (son) by choice with someone six months ago. Nothing compares.
LikeLike
Opinion please. Does this guy have a gay face? He played in the movie savages.
http://celebrities.findthedata.org/l/762/Aaron-Taylor-Johnson
http://ohbythewayblog.blogspot.com/2012/09/beauty-man-aaron-taylor-johnson.html
LikeLike
No.
LikeLike
Whew!! Thanks!! 😀
Sometimes I think really attractive men are always said to be gay when they’re not. I don’t think it’s fair to just label a guy “possibly gay” simply because ge is very good looking in a nit so rugged way.
LikeLike
The difference between fops and fags is subtle, but there nonetheless. If he makes you think of The Three Musketeers or Cap’n Jack Sparrow rather than Calvin Klein, he’s probably a fop.
I’d bang his sister if he has one though.
LikeLike
Blogger Challenges Abercrombie’s ‘Skinny’ Image
http://mashable.com/2013/05/20/abercrombie-fitch-skinny-ads/
HAHAHAHAHAH ::barf:: HA ::barf:: HA ::barf:: HA ::barf:: HA ::barf:: HA,…
LikeLike
Re: the richwine tweet. Look at the awful feminist (presumably) wildebeest doing the bidding for Obama in punishing the sexier milf who runs True the Vote.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/348811/partisan-union-irs
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/348756/true-scandal-jillian-kay-melchior
Daddies, don’t let your baby girls grow up to be feminists.
LikeLike
I have to cop to the gay kid thing. Whipped beta man who let his wife turn into a walrus; son is a white knight trying to save an online train wreck girl, but does not date real girls at all; daughter is vaguely repulsed by everything masculine, and militantly lesbian.
This is what happens when you let your wife tell you what to do. It ruins you, AND it ruins your kids. Everybody suffers. Feminism MUST DIE!
LikeLike
On the other hand, I know a woman whose father was such an alpha cad that he repeatedly cheated on her mother with multiple models (he was a photographer). It screwed up his daughter. Now she’s become lesbian to spite him.
Weak beta, alpha cad — who know what will damage your kids?
LikeLike
Jason, how many pats on the head do you get for the short responses?
LikeLike
Use a syllogism to make an argument, and I’ll listen to you.
LikeLike
Hahaha! Still throwing that word around for dramatic effect huh? It’s really simple, buddy. Your desire to constantly disprove the reasonable conclusions here by a group of above average posters by throwing around first year graduate terms only proves your education, NOT your ability to grasp reality and see the most basic demonstrations of casuality. Like a classical nihilist you refuse to refute any arguments laid before you and stupidly, or should I say naively, believe being skeptical of a premise without any rebuttal other than stating an example to the of the original premise and smugly smirk to yourself, confident of your victory. In truth, you just look like a philosophical amateur.
LikeLike
“Who knows what will damage your kids? ”
That’s right Jason. Retreat to your familiar ground of relativism where you aren’t required to face down reality. Wouldn’t want you to take a position lest you appear “dogmatic” to your fellow Humes. If you had any shred of credibility you would see what the original post was about and try to refute the premise by arguing a declarative position to the contrary but like a small, weak vegan boyman you just snark a sarcastic response which you believe in your delusion of grandiose makes you seem edgy. Maybe that works in your circle where sounding cool trumps saying something intelligent. Oh yeah, and fuck you, little faggot.
LikeLike
You’re a total troll.
LikeLike
No Jason, just someone who sees completely through your beginners angst. You think you’ve got this shit all figured out but you don’t. The dark reality you see on this site day in and day out frightens the living hell out of you so you rationalize it all away with liberal theories taught to you by university and the media, but your inability to embrace it isn’t permanent if you would just shut the fuck up and stop trying to make life fair and be masculine for once.
LikeLike
Hilarious that you think I’m both little and a faggot.
Tell you what, go look up “ad hominem”. You’ll find it next to “false dichotomy” and “slippery slope” and all sorts of other wonderful fallacies that people who argue, professionally, understand.
Report back what you learn.
LikeLike
I thought you were an alpha who liked to fight, captain. You strike me as a cock smoker. The way you cower to some of the more liberal denizens here. Even now, you’ve been called out for debating like a sophmore at university in front of God and all get out and all you can muster is that I must be a troll. I’ve read day after day your liberal take on the reality we co habit and you strike me as someone who’s at home pushing around freshman in New Englandesque towns, cowering in fear of any minority in ear shot, ready to appease and prove your progressive way of thinking. You deserve every bit of subjugation your “equals” dump on you. Probably against guns and wouldn’t dare say the word “nigger” for fear of his life. Coward.
LikeLike
Seeing these posts makes me wonder Jason’s point. Is he arguing for gays or against alphas? He has to be indoctrinated by liberals to use the term Ad Hominem as an actual counterpoint but still I want to know his statements followed up by supporting points.
LikeLike
Jason, appealing to a couple false authorities (including himself), bluffs:
Tell you what, “professional[] argue[r].” Look up the literal definition of “ad hominem.” If you can make it past the shorthand connotations of an overused phrase, you might have cause to lecture others. This will especially come in handy when you are trying to school somebody like an uppity librarian.
“Ad hominem” means “against the man.” Not every attack against the man is illegitimate or fallacious:
http://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2013/04/what-is-ad-hominem-fallacy.html
I am happy to see Patriarch has the patience to deal with your persistent errors. I like the cut of this fellow’s jib.
Matt
LikeLike
Ok,you are the asshole that says homosexuality is genetic, then you say this girl “became” a lesbian to “spite her father”,because she is mad that he banged chicks .Her father was an alpha cad,which equals High T. She was born with High T,so she is highly sexual. if she is a dyke-she was born that way. .(CH has discussed this b4,you need to read a little) So you’re saying she prefers MEN and wants to be happy with a man but she will forego all that and slurp lesbian pussy—just let that image linger in your mind a bit. Rosie O’D;Maude;the red haired chick from Canada—just to upset her dad,who is at that very moment slurping the hot young sexy pussy of some Italian model??
LikeLike
See my comment above:
Neither nature nor nurture provides a complete view of life.
My POV: Some gays are born, some gays are made.
It’s not either/or — it’s both/and.
LikeLike
I like Jason, and he is right sometimes, but most of the time I disagree with him cuz he sounds like he’s repeating MSNBC or Jezebel.
Alpha cad is moot, since if he’s cheating on his wife so that his kids find out, it means he is a weak instant-gratification creep. He is no alpha. Alpha fathers don’t hurt their kids. They might discipline them physically and emotionally because they love them and they want to straighten them out and make them successful winners, but they DON’T make their kids lose respect for them, or drop from the pedestal that all kids put their parents on.
So whatever Jason is describing was no alpha. He was a party boy/cad/lout who managed to get married (when he shouldn’t have – having such great access to young pussy) and afterwards felt trapped, so he lashed out by acting his desires in front of his kids, instead of being more discreet. People really need to think before they let instant gratification take over their lives. Some actions are harmfully irreversible.
That said, it’s true, many things can damage your kids. However, homosexuality is a number-one threat in the history of the world, because it’s literally a grand-scale war on your kids’ souls. No doubt, Jason thinks no one can make another become gay, but that’s a false premise since homosexuality is a learned behavior. One day he’ll have kids, and living in California, the most liberal state in the Union, they will be indoctrinated at a very young age in the ways and means of the homosexual lifestyle – like it’s all normal and good and noble, like it’s a human genetic trait, like many famous contributing humans were homosexual throughout the ages, like gay sex is beautiful, and so on and so forth. One day, at his child’s first grade, they will meet two homosexual males with their supposed kids and be told that it’s cool to have two daddies to play games with. And one day at his child’s sixth grade, they will be asked who they wanted to marry and that it could be either a boy or a girl, makes no difference. And one day at his child’s 9th grade, they will be encouraged by the teacher to experiment with all types of sex so they can determine what they “like” better.
Jason, if you don’t believe it, soon you will. It’s already seeping slowly and methodically into many schools. For example, in your great state of California, they already have mandates to include in all schoolbooks, specific chapters about supposed famous homosexuals (usually rumored, since no one has proof they were homosexuals) and their contributions to humanity. That means Shakespeare, Newton, da Vinci are all in the gay-activists’ and their peddlers’ cross-hairs, because they conveniently claim these men were homosexuals, even though they lack proof, all in an attempt to legitimize the gay lifestyle and indoctrinate impressionable young minds in the ways and of the “goodness” of homosexuality. Think about it: these geniuses indeed contributed to humanity, but why is it so important to mention their sexuality? Does any famous person want his sexuality remembered? It’s pathetic, to say the least. But, is it? Indeed, it’s grasping at straws for the gay community, but in order to gain legitimacy and have the gay lifestyle stand on the same level with heterosexuality – shoulder to shoulder – the gay community needs desperately to take the focus off sex and make gays look as smart and as contributing as heterosexuals. That’s why California insists on having chapters in schoolbooks mentioning famous “gays”, and treating them like they were an oppressed religion/nationality, while focusing on their supposed achievements to make them look respectable. I know it’s hard to believe that such an intricate diabolical scheme is a foot, but it is. The proof is all around us, militant gay activists and their peddlers trying so hard to legitimize their lifestyle via schoolbooks and our children’s tender minds, since everything else failed up to now.
LikeLike
Alpha cad is moot, since if he’s cheating on his wife so that his kids find out, it means he is a weak instant-gratification creep. He is no alpha.
In addition, because he could only marry a woman he doesn’t really want, he can’t be an alpha.
So whatever Jason is describing was no alpha. He was a party boy/cad/lout who managed to get married (when he shouldn’t have – having such great access to young pussy) and afterwards felt trapped, so he lashed out by acting his desires in front of his kids, instead of being more discreet.
Again, I imagine his wife is an average-looking woman, or, if she’s hot, has a personality like nails on a chalkboard.
LikeLike
Or, the story could be an example of liberal hysteria. How many times did we hear about some supposed alpha injuring his kids by his philandering? Don’t think I didn’t think of that too. Except, I give Jason the benefit of the doubt when he says he knows the woman.
Oh wait a minute, it’s the woman telling him this story form her point of view, lol. No doubt, her liberal hamster embellishes more than is actual true.
Jason, I’d be careful before I listen to every liberal woman’s musings.
LikeLike
Jason said:
“It screwed up his daughter. Now she’s become lesbian to spite him.”
Any woman who points at her daddy’s love of women as the reason she became a lesbian whore, is knee deep in hamster rationalization, or just a fucking liar. It’s not like he sexually abused her, which I would agree is a very good reason for a child to become all screwed up. This bitch just hates men, starting with her father. Hell freezing over, before I’ll take her word for it.
LikeLike
Actually, I know the story very well through my wife, because these people are in her extended family.
And dad’s dad (grandpa) was a philanderer too, who damaged ALL of his kids with his affairs. The kids, now in their 50s and 60s, are still resentful.
Alphas-gone-wild sometimes crap their own beds and screw up their families. The dark side of alphadom.
LikeLike
Jason, you are right that an alpha personality can be quite destructive in the aspect that you described, but had he swung back in the other direction it would habe been a catasttophe. They might have resented him, but they respected him.
LikeLike
Oh, and I thought it was genetic.
LikeLike
I’m sorry, but telling your daughter it’s okay to marry somebody outside of her own religious beliefs (even, and perhaps especially, if those beliefs are atheistic) is HORRIBLE. As is everything else he advises in his “I don’t care if” list. Those are all some of the most important compatibility criteria there are.
LikeLike
Last week some ch was saying that kids were 18 years of buzzkill and that he was going to rely on hookers and liquor into his elder years. I figured this wad written by the same ch doing a fictional perspective. But maybe this is a different ch? Or maybe there is one ch who is married with a daughter?
LikeLike
Did you click on the link? The entire post was a parody of a Huffpost article.
LikeLike
No. I did not click on the link. I thought something ch wrote was featured on huff po.
LikeLike
Wow , you’re pretty smart for a girl.
LikeLike
Femx dusts off shoulders. Pats self on back.
LikeLike
Starts tingling. Initiates fantasy of CH gang-bang while boyfriend boyfriend boyfriend watches. (To be continued…)
LikeLike
Rogue, you may be projecting.
LikeLike
Suddenly, hamster kicks in. Denial. Tingle. Denial. Look at me. No, don’t look at me. Boyfriend look at me…please! (To be continued…)
LikeLike
I just read the article. Lol. Ch may speak the truth today but the innate is maleable through the force of natural selection. That author has passed on his essence. His psychological profile may become the real and innate generations from now. Ch will go extinct. Humans can become what that huff po writer thinks humans are now. Dinosaurs did become hummingbirds after all.
LikeLike
CH has many disciples (for better or worse) and that is not something all parents insire.
LikeLike
HAHHAHA! *inspire*
LikeLike
Another day, another pregnancy fantasy out of this one.
LikeLike
The Huffington Post censored everything in the letter about Google being a government spy machine, among other politically incorrect items. Sad. That tells me that Google really is a government spy machine.
LikeLike
Use Bing instead…
If you are not worried about being assimilated by BILLGATUS of Borg!
LikeLike
Oh wait, this is satire. Nevermind
LikeLike
Man, that was confusing until I read the HuffPo article.
LikeLike
Often overlooked as a modality for the instilling of sanity into young women is to get them riding big, semi-trained horses well before their 5th birthday. That way, they learn early and deep about what they truly value in a relationship. They will appreciate it intensely, and a lot of teenage bullshit will probably never even happen. It helps tune-up their womanly brains. God Be Praised, I say. A few get killed, however.
The upper class Brits were onto something.
LikeLike
My advice for producing sane daughters is to make sure they are seriously involved with high performance horses well before their 5th birthday. With reasonable luck, she will not crunched up. And if so, she will be 1000s times more aware of herself and her true sexuality than the non-horse girls.
I do not want to give away details, but my girl child was on the Semi-Pro Circuit by age 15. The kind of support needed to make that possible is in the category of… “If you have to ask” because first you need a thourough-bred daughter plus some elite horses and a nice ranch on which to train them all. And close to the large, prosperous city you happened to live in of course.
When you did it right, you will get to keep one foto of your 11 blonde sprite tugging away in barn mud to advance the blood soaked natural birth of a colt and another foto of her taking first in the Hunter Jumper wars with that same colt at her age of 15 at the largest equestrian competition in the world.
LikeLike
Out of my own curiosity could you explain a bit further how being around horses helps girls? I was a horse girl myself growing up (I rode hunter-jumper from age 6 until age 19 and then quit) and I do consider myself saner, more realistic, and more traditional than other girls of my generation. I never saw a connection with the horseback riding though, and I actually thought that I should avoid putting my own daughter in riding because of the danger involved and considering what a huge money hole it is.
LikeLike
Sorry, but I’ve known plenty of horse girls and I can tell you that women are all the same. They just think they’re different.
LikeLike
The Huffpo author is so “””progressive””” that he progressed into the leftoid twilight zone, but even that isn’t enough for the insane leftoid commenters. He forgot that his daughter might be a lesbian. He must repent and ask Obama and all people who may or may not have been offended for forgiveness.
They’re insane, but there’s no cure, we’re stuck with them.
LikeLike
So, what do you do if you’re a girl who doesn’t want a masculine “alpha male” companion? Really masculine types don’t interest me at all.
LikeLike
Of course you don’t want an alpha male as a companion. You just want him to visciously implant his seed in your lustful belly with as much force and a lack of concern for your opinion as he can muster.
LikeLike
Sexy! You have a way with words.
LikeLike
The hindbrain wants what the hindbrain wants.
LikeLike
I’m not weird for thinking impregnation is sexy?
LikeLike
Not if you’re a female.
LikeLike
Yes, I’m a female. Is it weird for girls to be turned on by getting impregnated? Is it weird for guys to get turned on by impregnating girls? Wouldn’t both just be normal and natural?
LikeLike
Oh, he cares who his daughter’s potential partners vote for. That much is clear despite the HuffPo article’s denial of such.
LikeLike
Yep!!!! They do protest too much, don’t they?
LikeLike
RE: Richwine’s article on NRO. Kudos to him for posting it and kudos to NRO for putting it online.
The flat-earthers that cry “science!” and then clutch their pearls and sputter when science comes up with things counter to their cognitive bias, richly deserve to be mocked.
And Heritage: Grow a pair. Please. If their most intellectually honest employees keep leaving, there’s not going to be much “think” left in their tank.
LikeLike
There never was much thinking in Heritage.
LikeLike
A little video for you Heartiste.
LikeLike
What about buy a Little Girl Dresse for your little girl, or just a wedding dress for your wife?
LikeLike
I almost cried reading that, you are… my daddy (not in a sick way). “Cutie-pie” was term of endearment for me (with always a hint of mocking behind his calls “oh cutie-pie do you really need the empty calories?”).
Be skinny, give all your attention, do not take attention from your mother away from me.
I did it, everything, I got is this house these cars, those vacations during Christmas and Easter (even if he hadn’t but my mother had “allowed” him too believe it).
They have been very happy. An alpha and the submissive barely English speaking immigrant that worked under him he married after he’d knocked her up, he 36, she 29. They have had an amazing loving marriage. He was always dominant (fuck passive aggression in any form, it’s degrading and weak).
And together they raised a thin, cutie alpha widow.
Hey, maybe I’ll get lucky like my mom and find and man who is “ready” and way more dominant than I who pokes holes in condoms and leaves me no choice but be his love slave, bear his burly blue eyes children and raise them to me manly men and dainty darlings.
Who knows…
LikeLike
My eyes are hazel , but a lot of people make that mistake.
And I’ve already told you I don’t want kids.
What is it with you women ? No means No.
LikeLike
Ok Simon. Guess I don’t have to worry about those hole pokes in the condoms, unless you’re trying to give me the clap; which would just be crude of you.
Hazel is the poor man’s blue btw.
LikeLike
So does this mean that the pseudonymous Heartiste is in real life none other than Dr. Kelly M. Flanagan PhD… a licensed clinical psychologist, practicing at Alliance Clinical Associates in Wheaton, IL. He is also a writer and blogs regularly about the redemption of our personal, relational, and communal lives. Kelly is married, has three children, and enjoys learning from them how to be a kid again. You can find him on Facebook, Twitter, and Google+.
LikeLike
Blasphemy. Our local leader CH wasn’t born of a woman. He was assembled out of the remains of dead womanizers and burns whiskey instead of glycogen for fuel. He has two Y chromosomes and no nipples. He writes these posts with his opposable penis. You could tell him to go to hell but he has no soul
LikeLike
My father told me to do everything possible to please my husband.
I think having a strong man as a father helps a girl enormously and what the feminists and the manboobs can’t realize is that generally if a woman takes one step for man, the man would take ten steps for her.
LikeLike
“if a woman takes one step for man, the man would take ten steps for her.”
You may be on to something there
LikeLike
Thanks for the post, but, damn, that column on HP is scary. I also read it thinking that CH published a toned down version on HP.
The HP piece underscores for me how single women have no conception that they are supposed to bring something to a martial relationship. Not money, although it can be that in part.
Looking at single women is like looking at the levels of rock on the side of a cliff and seeing history. The big change started with women who are about 35 now, I believe.
LikeLike
‘The big change started with women who are about 35 now, I believe.’
I’m 36 (and male). What ‘big change’ are you alluding too?
Radical Feminism was codified into law by Baby Boomers back in the 1970s. People who are 35 now were just being born!
The only real big change that females in my age cohort have had is a massive increase in lesbianism, mostly attributable to the popularity of the movie ‘Wild Things’.
LikeLike
How massive? I’m interested in identifying the perceived if not the actual scope of change.
LikeLike
I read that after I posted it and could have been clearer.
Growing up with Gen X women, I did not perceive that they were especially narcissistic. I could have frequent and meaningful interactions with them. They did not think they were smarter, more talented or better looking than they really were.
I started sensing something off about 8 years ago dating women in their mid to late-20s. My math puts these women at about 35 today. I began to encounter women that were not merely self-assured but delusional in their self-appreciation.
Of course, feminism started a long time ago. But this phenomenon is deeper than that. This is about young(ish) women that have a warped view of their own value and importance. I don’t think the feminists in the 1960s had this going on no matter how crazy they were.
This is the fallout of all the daddies like that guy on HuffPo convincing their daughters how wonderful they are. Women absorb these types of stimuli just as they absorb other types of negative stimuli — like parental abandonment — more than men.
LikeLike
No I think it’s the ones about 55 now, they were around when “consciousness ” had been raised, so they were pissed off, but before women had things set up so they could easily get into grad school and med school etc as they can now. It was on the cusp. Young chicks now look at cat lady/strong empowered women and know they’re disgusting to me.
LikeLike
You had me going for a while. I was wondering what the hell you were on about — until I click on the link and saw this is another devastating satire. That HuffPost article was so Beta and patronizing my computer stopped because the flood of female hormones made my memory chips wilt.
LikeLike
True, that!
LikeLike
AWESOME
And thank you for leading off with the swipe at those c*nts at Google.
LikeLike
Conservatism caused by monogamous mating strategy?
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-murder-and-the-meaning-life/201006/is-opposition-pot-smoking-really-just-fear-sex
LikeLike
Married couples overwhelmingly voted for Romney, so this is no surprise.
LikeLike
O.T. Check out these photos, Heartiste. http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/05/mesmerizing-photographs-of-soldiers-faces-before-during-and-after-a-war-2652322.html
I’d say Alphas tend to look more like the “during” pictures of these guys and bets’s look like the niave “Before” pictures of these guys. Divorced blue-pill betas look like the depressed/suicidal “after” pictures.
LikeLike
Dealing with modern wimyn is a war.
LikeLike
Do the male or female soldiers look worse in the after picture?
Give up?
The answer is: TRICK QUESTION.
There are no women in the military. There are several instances of individuals who lack a Y chromosome serving but to date a human female has never served in any military in Western history.
LikeLike
From the CH twitter:
http://mashable.com/2013/05/20/abercrombie-fitch-skinny-ads/
This is seriously nasty shit.
LikeLike
Wow, fat – yes. Attractive – NO.
LikeLike
Best FATkini comment: “Be sure to choose an easily identifiable color, like neon orange. We wouldn’t want the Japanese to mistakenly strike you with their harpoons out on the hunt.”
LikeLike
I’m confused… is CH’s article the satire… or the HuffPo puffer piece?
Jes’ sayin’, ’cause the latter was funnier.
LikeLike
The real joke is the comments on Huff Pizzle.
Those people….never have I been more happy to have been raised in a backwater area of a backwater area.
LikeLike
I can’t believe I read most of this tripe, what the hell is wrong with me..?
LikeLike
Honestly…half of the stuff on here is descent…the other half is immature, douchy, and just unintelligent.
LikeLike
And to which half were you intending contribution?
LikeLike
WTF are you talking about?!…that was the most non-sensicle shit I have ever read.
LikeLike
You write great. Straight to the point but you make it humorous. Love this post, it made me laugh with it’s extremely blunt truths.
LikeLike
#1. “Alpha” males do not write, read, or reply to blogs.
#2. Any woman who prefers “bad boys” has issues that disqualify her from bearing my children. Sex? Sure. Maybe.
#3. You dweebs need to spend more time analyzing why you can’t get laid instead of blaming women.
LikeLike
Any men can blog. Alpha males or any other type of males.
Real women don’t want bad boys, they want real men who know how to be a man.
LikeLike
ur new here boobies keep reading ur just getting started
LikeLike
Alpha males CAN blog, they just don’t.
They are too busy taking advantage of other people.
MOST “bad boys” (and they are BOYS, not men) abuse women,
children, and dogs. Sometimes they kill them.
And real MEN do not refer to women or girls by of the hateful names
I see all over this site.
LikeLike
Not all Alpha Males feel the need to take advantage of others, and some bad boys are just extremely misguided, misunderstood individuals, who will hopefully one day become good men. I agree that real men do not refer to women by hateful names. However I think it’s sometimes necessary to understand when something is directed in a humorous way. Sometimes a little humor helps to soften the blow in harsh truths. Also as much as derogatory terms are unnecessary we are not in a position to form judgement, everybody has uttered a curse at one point or another and we are all free to express ourselves verbally. Just because I may read the word “b*tch” or “w*ore* somewhere I will not take it personally as I know a woman’s worth and if it is sprinkled with sarcasm and humor, to each their own.
LikeLike
What’s a nice girl like you doing in a place like this?
LikeLike
Joseph brah, do you even lift?
Seriously, do you lift?
I’m guessing not because the only thing I see you doing is trying to prove to us how much more manly you are without realizing that the stereotype you are trying to rise above is an apt description of you. The problem is, no one here is impressed by your Captain Crusader mentality. This isn’t Roadhouse, and you aren’t Patrick Swayze. Drop the “holier than thou” mentality and stay a while. It’ll do you some good, son.
LikeLike
You so funny…..
and not worth a reply.
But FYI, I deadlift 310 lbs…..
LikeLike
Buhahahahahaha
Amazing. All snarky liberals on the internet are always serious hard hitters in the weight division. How many reps is that, Sly?
Is that one gut straining 310 or is that your maintenence weight?
Not worthy of a reply huh?
I’m giving you what you want. This is why you came here, isn’t it? You can’t possibly be stupid enough to think your tired out old arguments are going to convince any one here of anything….jesus. I tell ya what Poppa Bear…
For being a guy who’s dead set on disproving the alpha male uses blogs you certainly are deadset on your own blog of wearing out your keyboard.
Lulz
LikeLike
Must be tough being so insecure you have to talk about things you couldn’t possibly know anything about to amuse your boyfriends. This site reminds me of a bunch of 10-year olds in their “I Hate Girls” treehouse. Well, guess what? Girls hate you, too.
LikeLike
Harhahar,
Look Joe. It isn’t difficult. You came here with a plug up your booty all mad because “alphaz do nots use the interwebz”.
Cool bruh, cool.
Most of the guys here are not like you.
You’ve got something to rationalize to yourself, a bone to pick with reality. That’s fine. We can help you, you know, if you like, are crying out for help and what not. If you don’t tell us where it hurts, we can’t kiss it and make it all better. Tell me, when you are dead lifting, do you use a stability bar or is this free weight? We might could help you out if you were serious about lifting also.
LikeLike
So sad.
Sure your boy’s club isn’t a bunch of repressed homosexuals?
LikeLike
Pretty sure it isn’t man. This isn’t your sterotypical negro progressive circle jerk, Uncle Tom. We don’t discuss things like the “morally superior” women you are used to bootlicking for on your blog, son.
Ugly reality. Ugly reality. Shaming tactics don’t work, FYI.
LikeLike
So you’re not just an asshole, you’re a racist asshole.
So sad. Then I guess you know why you can’t get laid,
your women are with me.
LikeLike
Not just a racist asshole,
A goodlooking racist asshole.
My women aren’t with you.
They’re racists also.
LikeLike
And quit changing the subject,
A bunch of losers spending all their free time hating on
women is as gay as it gets.
LikeLike
We aren’t hating on women.
We are discussing tactics to manipulate then.
LikeLike
Which proves you are an Omega male.
You can’t manipulate women; they know what you’re thinking before you think it. What an idiot!
LikeLike
Gullible is as gullible does, brother.
Didn’t anyone ever tell you to beware the clever white devil? There’s a reason the world hates us.
LikeLike
Oooo, I’m so scared.
White Devils die like everyone else.
Who’s watching the watcher?
Glad to see your panties in a twist…..
LikeLike
Yes. Alas we are mortal.
It’s the time before we die that’s filled with mischievousness.
LikeLike
and your point is…..
I suggest you spend more time trying to get laid
rather than trying to convince yourself and others you’re
something that you’re not.
As for me, I only visited this site because it was mentioned in another site.
I see it’s full of Mental Midgets; nothing to see here, so buh bye!
LikeLike
Why should we take you seriously?
I’ve seen your blog. You have the sensibilities of a child and the mental reasoning skills of every average progressive we have ever seen here. You can hate reality all you want. The amoral truths will find you out. You should read the articles here.
LikeLike
Because I’m going to eat dinner, have sex with my hot young lady friend, and try to get up at 5 a.m. to go to the gym. I’ll leave the reading of this blog to you and your peers.
LikeLike
Don’t be a fool. Wrap your tool.
LikeLike
Translation of Josephs post: my fat girlfriend…
LikeLike
Translation of Dweebs reply:
“The shoe fits.”
LikeLike
Dweeb huh?
Don’t be mad at us you have to nail fatties.
You should join us. We are trying to help you.
LikeLike
Project much?
Like I said…..
LikeLike
Help us?
We are doing fine, bud. Unlike you,
We are allowed to express our thoughts, unfraid of offending sacred cows.
LikeLike
You are the cow…..
LikeLike
Nah buddy…I don’t swing that way.
LikeLike
Well, the Peter Meter did say mine was good for big wimmen and small cattle.
LikeLike
Greg, this guy has a part of his blog dedicated to women being the superior sex. It’s funny because the white women he’s crusading for wouldn’t piss on him if he were covered in fireants. Yes, he’s an authentic chocolate face, no make up.
LikeLike
That’s not what yo Momma said…..
LikeLike
Yes, he’s an authentic chocolate face, no make up.
And so you’re bothering to bandy words with him, why?
LikeLike
Nat Geo research grant.
LikeLike
Actually, it’s more of a mocha, not that you ignoramuses would know the difference. I am immune to racism because without exception, every racist I have ever known has been a coward, hiding behind something while pretending to be something. For example, your profiles are blocked.
Little boys pretending to be men. Which is why no decent woman would have anything to do with them. Most of them are also repressed homosexuals, which is why they hate women.
Maybe Nat Geo should research that?
LikeLike
This, coming from a writer who, in the last several days referred to “plodding dads”…
Looks like a genetic dead end for you, eh, C. H.?
LikeLike