• Home
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Manboob Utterance Of The Month
Comment Of The Week: The Guileless Gatsby »

The Best All-Purpose Alpha Male Text Response

May 31, 2013 by CH

Esteemed and slightly deranged readers, a contest is in order to determine the best, all-purpose alpha male text response that a man can send to a woman who is behaving womanly. By “womanly”, I mean head games, coyness, and the usual panoply of female shit tests intended to weed out the wilting betabois from the alert alphas. By “all-purpose”, I mean a response that can be slipped seamlessly into the flow of most text conversations with a girl whom you are trying to bang (or not bang, but just fucking around with for flirty fun) that serves to heighten her curiosity and sexual interest.

An all-purpose alpha male text ideally would be:

1. Short and sweet. Chicks dig opaque men.

2. Funny and/or witty.

3. Self-entitled.

4. Endearingly dismissive and cocky.

5. Borderline assholish.

6. Sufficiently ambiguous that it can be used as a reply to a variety of soft or hard challenges from women.

The following ten contenders for Most Alpha Text (MAT) are the collected gems culled from the best of the Chateau archives:

“gay” (credit: el chief)

“Bring the movies”

“I don’t want to get you pregnant”

“nah”

“Little spoons don’t ask big questions”

“lotstas ccockas 4u lzozozozoz”

“Seriously tho! ur pussy rocks!”

“Are you auditioning for a soap opera?”

“tl;dr”

“8===D”

Think hard about this vote, because your life depends on it.

The voting:

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Game | 409 Comments

409 Responses

  1. on May 31, 2013 at 11:31 am Tampa

    “Bring the Movies” will always have a special place in my heart, but one vote for “gay”


    • on May 31, 2013 at 11:41 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      LZOZOZOZOL

      sorryyr i have not been postsing but da GBFM has been overlaoding overloaded with sweeeeet summertime pususysysysp pusussyyss and reading da GRETA BOOKZ

      by day goesz like disz

      1. get up early at 10:30 ama AM
      2. tell hot hottiez in da gbfm beedx bedz “TIMESZ to WAKE UPZ and GO 2 WORKZ!!!!”
      3. she saysz “Where do youw workz?”
      4. GBFM sayz “i haven’t been fully honest with you.”
      5. she lookz at me, showing a boob from under da sheetz
      6. da GBFM does her one more timez and says “OK now realy gotta go 2 woerk work call ya laterz — hey wait take da moviez” and i ggive hger her da movies she brought over as last nite was a “bring da movies” nightz lzozozlz
      7. it is noonz and da GBFM takes out HOMERZ ILIADZ to see how REAL MENZ useddz to act like RELA MENZ with HONRO AND INTEGRITY and DECENCY And COURAGE AND NOBILTY nand MANLY MANLIENESS And how WOEMNZ acted like real WOMENZZ before dey were all nerbebekankied in der bugholeozoz
      8. and da GBFM readz and reandsz and readz all day longz

      and the sun begeinz to go downz
      amd da GBFM thinks to himselfz
      “MAN it’s been 10 hours since ive had me som pusysysysysysysy zlzolzlzlzozoozl”
      so like AHCILLEZ da GBDFM TAKE ACTIONZ
      to correct teh rowrld and ste set it rightz
      and get some pusysysysyss overz
      but does da GBFM go out?
      hell nNO! going out is for betasz
      who use der beta bucks to pay cover charageez
      and buy girls dinnerz and drinks and foodz
      so dat when dey show up at da GBFMZ
      dey are not hungry and won’t eat my pziziz pizizzia
      nor my heinkeks nor drink my heieneieksz nor PBRs
      but will only take
      a GBFM milk shake
      lzozzlozzlzozoozozozozozozoz

      1. 9 PM: da gbfm sends out a mass text 2 all my ladies:

      “lotsa cocksa 4 u lzozlzlz.”

      da gbfm then gets back dozens of messages:

      lol
      wtf

      ok
      haha
      ???

      kewl
      wat?

      2. da gbfm waits and hour and sends out to everyone again:

      10 PM: “srry wrng #”

      da gbfm then gets back lotsa texts

      awwww
      lol
      too bad
      u got my hopes up
      damn you

      ur loss

      3. da gbfm then waits ’til midnight and texts to everyone:

      12 Midnightz: my place 30 min.

      den da gbfm sits back and watches the parade arriving on his door camera monitor while he watches da espn highlights and reads homer’s odyssey. ding-dog ding-dong they ring da gbfm bell one by one hoping to touch da gbfm’s ding-dong zlzozozzozololzollzo but if they are under an 8 da gbfm just ignorez & reads his boookz zlzozoolzz

      at 1 am a hot hottie shows up and da gbfm hits the buzzer and lets her up.

      da gbfm saves lotsas times and money while the betas liquor her up at the bars and da gbfm gets to hang out with homer instaead of goldidggers and douchetard boobie-men manboobz at all the clubs these days lzlzllzlzl

      PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do nottry this on your own as da GBFM needz you out there buying them drinkz all night and getting them dinnerz as i don’t want no hos eating my puizzaaa and heinekinz beerz!!!! we all have our part in this so please please respect yo!!!!! lzozolzolozzzz


      • on May 31, 2013 at 11:57 am Anonymous

        Lollzzzizzzozozz


      • on May 31, 2013 at 11:57 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        jus rememberz before u text “lostasz cockas 4u” dat a picturez is worth a thousandz wordz zlzlzlozolzozloz and dat storng men have ever been da silentz type cause if your’re well hung it atatrctasz da hottest bung zlzozolzoz


      • on May 31, 2013 at 12:09 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        IN HONOR OF THE MANBOOBZ from yesterday’s post
        and ALL THE BETA MANBOOBZ Out der
        da gbfm has compoeezzed two songz

        lzozozoozzo

        http://exceedandlead.com/2013/04/gbfms-one-cock-rule/

        “The venerable poet GBFM has graced the bernankifed desouled masses with another gem. I present his ode to The One Cock Rule and Three Cock Rule respectively.”

        OMG both of you betado9uches above are violating THE ONE COCK RULE!!!

        You are alloowing chix to bring other COCKS into your mind lozlzlzzoz zlozllzl. The second a chick makes me think of another cock she is outta my house outta my mind or if she’s texting on a date which almost never happens because i almost never date i go “i gotta use the men’s room lzozlzl” and then i leave her with the bill. she can text her ten other cocks to comne over and pay for her drniks/dinner lzozlzlzllzlzlz and then,. after paying, they have full right to gizizizizizalizzz all over her lzozlz

        “I’ve been seeing this girl for a year. We live together and I’ve still got hand.”

        OMG lzozzlzll wtf are fuckity fucks doing with chix in your homes? lzozlzlzlz omg lozlzlzlzlzl looozers lzozlzlzlz1!! hzhzh

        THEY VIOLATE THE ONE COCK RULE THEY ARE OUT! OUT!

        OUT!

        O U T OUT! lzozlzlzl

        OMG lozlzlzozlozozolzl wft r u doing dating a chick 4 a yer did your dick fall off? Were yu chosen by Beernanke and given an award and medal to support today’s slutty slutt vampiressses cuckholders cockcutters?

        sounds 2 me it is the latter as u have no cock lzozlzlzlzl lzzozl

        and she made you think of another cock

        fucktard haven’t u heard of the one cock rule?

        let’s teach these douches somethin ’bout nbein a man yo!

        throw a beat over this way.
        yo yo yo yo
        yo yo yo

        now hit it!

        one cock rule one cock rule
        i ain’t no beta fool i ain’t no beta tool
        about another cock ya make me think
        i’m gone, yo bitch,
        let the betas buy yas yer next drink

        one cock rule one cock rule
        i ain’t no beats fool i ain’t no beta tool
        over vampires and werewolfe you ginas all drool
        letting their cocks touch your deep down stool
        then you blame the betas in school
        and transfer wealth for the bernanke gene pool
        jonah goldberg sends our alphas 2 die on foreign shores
        stuffing his face with dc pizza as they die in fiat wars
        neocon womenz repeating butthexers lies in their mags
        even after menopause and no need for da ragz
        telling young chickas to lust after vampires
        as they build their fiat empires

        one cock rule one cock rule
        i ain’t no fool i ain’t no tool
        about another cock ya make me think
        i’m gone, yo bitch,
        let the betas buy yas yer next drink

        let the betas pay to raise your bastard kids
        let the betas sign teh fiat masters marriage contracts
        theft in fiat inflation is hid
        as they swing their bankrupting axe
        i don’t care what last night u did,
        ever since i kicked ya gina out, i been relaxed.

        as they promote butthex across the land
        ripping out fetuses from parenthood planned
        as fathers form teh homes the neocons ban
        the atalnatic authoresses just don’t undertsand

        but when chix wakes up and her butt is sore
        it’s not my fault no–it’s cause she’s a whore
        as the fiat masters desoul women with butthex cock
        teach them to transfer wealth with pre-teen strumpet rock

        one cock rule one cock rule
        i ain’t no fool i ain’t no tool
        about another cock ya make me think
        i’m gone, yo bitch,
        let the betas buy yas yer next drink

        womenz womenz bernanke took advanatge of you
        you wasted your best years on vampires and werewolves
        and now you cry your tears cause of your sore anus
        stamp your little feet saying, “you betas must pay for this!!!”

        and aging neocon women promoting butthexing vampires
        teacxhing women to lust after the undead
        as the neocons suck the western world dry
        bankrupting it all,m enlsaving it debt
        while selfish womenz at the atalnatic monthly
        cry cry cry
        cry cry cry
        not for you or me
        but for themselves
        not for the 50,000,000 aborted souls
        but for their dried up ginas and sore assholes
        so many chances they had to marry a nice guy
        but he left her dry
        so whe butthexed with the asshole
        and now see her cry
        and wonder why
        and transofrm the entire univeristy
        into a program to further the fiat lie
        to transfer wealth and wage war and death
        to about fifty million more
        and redefine fifty cocks in her ass as empowered
        and not a whore

        all together now!

        lzozllzzl lozlzlz zlozozoz
        lozlzl lzozozlz ozlzooz zlo9oo
        lozlzlz ozlzoozl ozlzlzoz lzozlz zlzoz zlzozzlozlzozlo

        one cock rule one cock rule
        i ain’t no fool i ain’t no tool
        about another cock ya make me think
        i’m gone, yo bitch,
        let the betas buy yas yer next drink
        alreayd seen yer pink stink
        bent ya over the sink

        and howscomes the bankers southpark never does satarize
        because everything is fair game–truth love honor–excpet for fiat butthexing lies.

        all together now!

        lzozllzzl lozlzlz zlozozoz
        lozlzl lzozozlz ozlzooz zlo9oo
        lozlzlz ozlzoozl ozlzlzoz lzozlz zlzoz zlzozzlozlzozlo

        AND THREE COCK RULE:

        ^^^^ to the 24 for or so tardbetadouches who voted my “one cock rule” rap down

        lozlzlzlzlozzllzlzlzlz

        what do ya want?

        a two cock rule rap?

        or three cock rule?

        three cock rule, three cock rule,
        i’m a beta herb my own cock won’t do
        i need a chick to cuckold me
        i need a chick on me to pee
        three cock rule, three cock rule,
        i love being the greater fool
        one cock in her mouth, one in her anus,
        i keep mine in my pants,
        and pay her bills and rent and fare for da bus.
        so she can club and grind, on denim cocks dance.
        three cock rule, three cock rule,
        i treat my lady like a nice guy,
        give her chivarly while with 2 others she doth lie,
        three cock rule, three cock rule,
        while your cock doth touch her stool,
        i play videogames @ home in my single mom’s basement,
        as teh fed fianance feminsits studies @ school,
        teaching her to love and bail out the butthexers,
        to persucte me 4 letting her live 4 free,
        while she tickles drummer/druggie cock until it goes
        splooge splooge splooge! tee hee tee hee!
        three cock rule, three cock rule,
        i’m the beta herb, teh cuckholded fool,
        i respect her, keep my cock in my pants,
        fund her with other cocks to dance.

        lozlzlzlzl

        or would u betaherbs prefer a five cock rule rap! omg i bet someofya would like dat! lzozl

        lzozozozo

        [CH: Beautiful. Brought a tear to me eye it did.]


      • on May 31, 2013 at 12:28 pm Anonymous

        I fucking love you no homo


      • on May 31, 2013 at 1:27 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozooz
        i luz you too!!!!

        Bromance
        Nothing really gay about it
        Not that there’s anything wrong with being gay (gay)
        Bro-o-o-omance
        Shouldn’t be ashamed or hide it
        I love you in the most heterosexual way


      • on June 1, 2013 at 5:10 pm lkdl

        but GBFM I need real advice. I believe my beta bitterness is justified. I call it justified bitterness. Why *should* game be necessary. Even CH would agree that “game” most importantly is acting entitled and acting like an ass. Chicks dig jerks. Why? They are stupid. The last chick to be nice to me, my ex wife, has not worked since 2003. Literally. She lives like a queen. Literally dozens of far prettier girls had that chance with me in my 20s and all were too stpuid. I’m talking literally don’t have to fucking work since 2003.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 12:36 pm Anonymous

        Fuck dude as a beta U kill me.

        Everybody read GBFM carefully. It is no joke.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 1:56 pm anon

        Bro I”m such a beta that I still want to marry my 37 (soon 38) year old ex GF just because she’s the hottest ass I can get. She does, indeed, have a banging 9 body and looks like she’s 18 from the neck down, yet as I posted a while back: she’s tatted up (another man put his mark right under her boob), she’s been with at least 8 guys before me (mostly LTRs and I honestly think I’m not being naive her number is not 50 like most whores in our generation, but still…), she actually thinks it would be okay to tell me–since she’s good in bed and we have “sexual freedom now”–that she once made a bet with her ex BF (whom she lived with for 3 years) that if he helped her move her stuff (new apartment) she’d owe him 40 blowjobs (she calls them “BJs”) in a row (40 days in a row) and she actually made it up to like 26 or something. He was an alpha, obviously. I never come in a girl’s mouth from BJs because I actually feel like I want to pleasure her. You have to be an alpha asshole simply to sit there and receive a “BJ.” Now, I did get to tie this girl up and “fuck her face” (her terminology) and she liked that, but when I do a girl doggy I actually hold back and am gentle (because it’s obvious that it could hurt if I go all out) (I’m not bragging and saying I”m super porn star huge but apparently I’m big enough, especially girth wise….been told that many many times). Ok…so my ex GF would totally fail your test (make me think of another cock) is my point and you’d kick her out after one night. Whereas I still want to marry her. I’m a beta tool. Thing is, I have been trying to work game the past 4 months since discovering this blog and I swear I can do it but certain other facts remain true….I only go for 7s and 8s and these bitches really do have all the power and they know it because 99% of their competition (other women) are obese land whales. Period. THese chicks are tough!!! Dude, even if I can run some pretty good game, they have 29 other guys as good as me too. I wish you would be honest here (nobody here really knows you): do you *really* fuck 5 new girls a week? Use that text thing you have put here? How the fuck do you do that? It’s impossible to even meet that many 7s. I have been doing day game, flirting with everyone I see, just for practice, doing “put your number in my phone” (2 for 2 on that with chicks who don’t even speak English…some dumb immigrant Colombian girl working as a flyer passer outer on the street gave me her # but then blew me off when I texted her 4 days later???). WTF dude? I swear I was more successful in the 90s (admittedly younger and in college) *before* cell phones. I have not figured out text or facebook game or match.com game.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 3:07 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        if u realyz want to
        pick up 10s
        look for one of my exesz
        in this t-shirtzz
        http://www.cafepress.com/cp/moredetails.aspx?productNo=582539775&pr=F&showbleed=False&colorNo=1&tab=1&Zoom=2&subFront=&subBack=&ptn=-1

        nd then gte get a time mahine to travle back ten yearz

        whn they were 24 instead of
        34
        zlzolzoozzozozoozzooz


      • on June 1, 2013 at 7:26 am Matthew King

        “1. Short and sweet.”

        Do as I say, not as I do.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 1:37 pm Southern Man

        4. GBFM sayz “i haven’t been fully honest with you.”

        Thread and poll winner, right there.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:20 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzoozozolz

        GBFM MAXIM # 238672389642384

        “da length of your textz need be inversely proportional to da length of your lottstsas cocckseas zlozlzozozozozo”


      • on May 31, 2013 at 4:18 pm corvinus

        +1


      • on May 31, 2013 at 5:02 pm Matthew King

        So what do we conclude from the length of comment posts? Directly proportional?


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:58 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozoz

        hey king matthew
        when da heartietss said
        “1. Short and sweet.”
        he don’t mean
        dip your pecker in honey
        lzozlzolzozlzlozozozo

        [CH: I gotta say, that was a sweet burn.]


      • on May 31, 2013 at 4:47 pm Stilicho

        Nice one….a sweet burn indeed.

        Now let’s see how many flatulent paragraphs our Mad Jesuit will write in response, and count how many times he quotes scripture, or refers us to Aristotle.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 4:52 pm Matthew King

        Yeah, I had to scroll through literally twenty pages of his text wall to get to that sweet burn.

        Like everybody here says, though, it was sooooo worth it!


      • on May 31, 2013 at 5:36 pm Anonymous

        Sweet burn? You guys are easily amused… sigh.

        And I would have thought GBFM above puerile little dick jokes… that’s Cathedral bullshit.

        Remember your GB, GBFM… a wise man loves a reproof. ;-)


      • on May 31, 2013 at 5:41 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        “a wise man knows himself to be a fool.” –shakespeare
        lzozozozozozozo

        please share a better joke with zuz z us
        and teahc us oh matserz
        how to laugh
        on a more sublime and noble
        and heroic
        manner
        like beethoevenz


      • on May 31, 2013 at 5:50 pm Greg Eliot

        (To the tune of the Fifth) HA HA HA HAAAAAAAA!


      • on June 1, 2013 at 6:23 am Zombie Shane

        > but does da GBFM go out?
        > hell nNO! going out is for betasz
        > who use der beta bucks to pay cover charageez
        > and buy girls dinnerz and drinks and foodz
        > so dat when dey show up at da GBFMZ
        > dey are not hungry and won’t eat my pziziz pizizzia
        > nor my heinkeks nor drink my heieneieksz nor PBRs

        In most of the kinds of young-people-dive-hangout environments [and even most middle-aged hangouts] that I’m familiar with, I just don’t see how you work “Game”.

        At its heart, “Game” involves maintaining [and especially guiding in the direction in which you want it to be guided] some sort of a conversation with a chick, and for the life of me, I don’t understand how you pull that off when the DJ is blasting the gangsta rap at 125 dB.

        Unless you’re both lip readers.

        In those kinds of environments – absent the potential to distinguish yourself from the competition with the soothsaying of your forked serpent tongue – you’re in a much more physical competition with the Guido crowd and their greased hair and their gold chains and their [gayish] obsession with pumping iron and their BMWs and whatnot.

        Not that there’s anything wrong with pumping iron – I love to exercise – but I ain’t obsessed with it.

        Anyway, I am a huge, huge fan of talking to chicks IN REAL LIFE [during the daytime, out in the real world, in normal everyday encounters], and then, when you do step it up to the romantic shiznat in the after hours, you take ’em to a place like a nice restaurant with an outdoor veranda*, where you can kick back and sip on some wine or some cocktails and just have a nice pleasantly refined adult conversation about how you’re gonna fuck each others’ brains out later that night.

        And taking a bitch on a romantic picnic, lying on a blanket, in a park, with some adult beverages [which requires you to be manly and carry that ice cooler about half a mile], is just about the most fun you can possibly have in life.

        *But even most indoors restaurants nowadays are getting so noisy and shrill and cacophonous that you have to lean over and cup your hand behind you ear to try to figure out what the hell somebody is trying to say to you.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 8:51 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lozozoz

        dat is EXACTLY HOW I DO IT!!!!

        “taking bitch on a romantic picnic, lying on a blanket, in a park, with some adult beverages.”

        “YO BITCH!” DA GBFM SAYS, “WE BE HGOIN ON A ORMANTIC PICNICK with no PICs OF MY DICK which you get to lick yo bitch and some adult ebevragez lzozozozo”


      • on June 1, 2013 at 3:49 pm Middle-Age Male

        They’re noisy on purpose. Eat and get out…

        Used to be in the business for over 20 years.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 1:44 pm Zombie Shane

        “They’re noisy on purpose. Eat and get out… Used to be in the business for over 20 years.”

        Wow – after all these years, I had never thought of that.

        Thanks – that was a huge insight for me.

        BTW, the French and the Italians want you to hang out in their restaurants for hours on end, but I guess that when it’s all said and done, the bills which they hand you tend to reflect it.

        Two different bidness models.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 6:40 pm YaReally


      • on June 2, 2013 at 12:59 pm redpillmtl

        You gotta isolate. Going out of the club for a smoke works great for me


      • on June 1, 2013 at 10:20 am WhoCares

        The best ALL PURPOSE ALPHA MALE.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 12:01 pm Anonymous

      I’ve been meaning to point out that “bring the movies” is very 2002 and marks one as a piece of white trash loser. In 2013 one should have Netflix and a 60 in Internet-connected LED TV hanging on the wall. Bring movies how? VHS or DVD??? Lololzzozozz. Demonstration of value and fun: Netflix and Internet-connected flat screen TV.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 12:07 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lozlzozozoz

        da GBFM has a beta-max player and an 8-track tape deck
        for all da alteranaivate girlz who majoredz in artz da artz
        and now are baristasz
        paying off der bernanakifed bunglhole student debtz
        as the college adminz beenrakifed them finanaiccialyyz
        while da alphasz in their dormz benerkkifiied dem analaly
        deousled them through their hole for poo zlozozozozo
        so now da poor lassez
        with no assetz
        and sore asses
        can only affordz
        to buyz 8-track tapez and beta moviez old btea moviez
        to bring over 2 da
        alpha gbfm homez zllzzloz

        zzlozlzolozloz


      • on May 31, 2013 at 12:30 pm Anonymous

        Lololzzozozzozzlololzz


      • on May 31, 2013 at 1:21 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        whem you’re a
        max alpha player
        like da gbfm
        den all da chix
        bring da movies
        4 da GBFM’s
        beta max player
        cause da GBFM =
        alpha max player
        lzozozoozzoozoz


      • on June 1, 2013 at 6:48 am Zombie Shane

        “an 8-track tape deck”

        Old School.

        Word.

        In all seriousness, going full-on Old School is a really good way to distinguish yourself from the competition. If all the other Guidos are taking out the chicks in their BMWs with their iPads bluetoothing to their stereo systems to play whatever happens to be the Jew-Pwned Nigger-Noise du jour*, whereas your ass takes her out in your rusty old pickup truck, with the 8-track, and you push in some Creedence or some Doobie Bros or some Buffett, then you’re immediately gonna be that outlier who gets her hamster revving with subconscious thoughts of “OMFG, who is this strange guy?!?”

        Bonus points if you have a bunch of empty beer cans on the passenger’s side floor, at her feet.

        *Did you hear how bitches are getting Herpes from Rihanna’s lipsticks?


      • on June 1, 2013 at 10:04 am Greg Eliot

        That’s nothing compared to what they be gettin’ from Ru Paul’s.

        llzoozozlzlzlzozozozlzlzlzozozlzlzlzlz


      • on May 31, 2013 at 12:11 pm JironGhrad

        I usually say something like, bring me a drink (or food). Free meal and/or drinks and you don’t even have to get up if the door is open.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 7:04 am Zombie Shane

        Back when I used to read Jewish propaganda and disinformation, I skimmed through a few chapters of Feynman’s autobiography, and his advice to geeks & nerds was that tricking the bitch into paying for the dinner date [instead of you paying for it yourself] was a sure-fire way to get laid.

        But that’s Jewish psychopathy for ya.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 4:56 pm metrocon

        Lol, having a led TV hanging on your wall is white thrash if anything. Just like having a smartphone.

        Be different. Use your shitty ten year old phone because you dont have time for video games anyway, and when a bitch asks where your tv is point towards your overflowing bookcases and tell her your prefer the classics.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 5:51 pm Greg Eliot

        Excellent.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 3:27 am Eugen

        You wrote this on a smartphone while watching the Kardashians on your plasma.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 6:52 am Greg Eliot

        She don’t look so heavy on my 13″ portable B&W. lulz


    • on May 31, 2013 at 12:17 pm Anonymous

      Bring the movies is 2003. U should have Netflix and an Internet-connected TV on the wall.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 1:22 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        netflix and Internet-connected TV on da wall are sooooo 2009
        u should have a lotsas cockas in her face
        lzozozolzozozo


      • on May 31, 2013 at 4:53 pm Matthew King

        Huh?


    • on June 1, 2013 at 12:12 pm Mr. Mitchell

      right


  2. on May 31, 2013 at 11:31 am Humungus

    Sending an actual dick pic should have been an option, not just the ASCII peen.

    And “I don’t want to get you pregnant is best when it is a total non-sequitor and makes no sense with what they just sent.


  3. on May 31, 2013 at 11:39 am thealchem1st

    I have been told by multiple women that a lone “K” has an uncanny tendency to send hamsters into convulsions.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 11:40 am july

      Agreed. The timely dropped ” k ” drives em nuts.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 12:08 pm Anonymous

      This…is true…”k” is powerful, but the timing has to be perfect, if you wait too long for “k” then it loses its power and will have a hint of butthurtness, the same if you reply with “k” too soon

      although the other day the “I havent been fully honest with you” actually works wonders as well


      • on May 31, 2013 at 9:04 pm feministx

        Oh noes! Here is a real text exchange between me and my boyfriend:

        http://postimg.org/image/7kdragclz/

        Don’t tell me he’s not beta after all :-/

        Bubbs is one of my hundred and seven nicknames for him.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:02 pm corvinus

        I rule him greater beta/lesser alpha. If he quit doing the beta things that you’ve mentioned, he’d be alpha.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 3:38 pm feministx

        Yep. I agree with your assessment.


      • on June 5, 2013 at 3:59 pm Glengarry

        The bastard just won’t change.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 12:14 pm yeahokcool

      my user name is simply a stringing together of the words i most commonly utilize when responding to women-folk. “yeah” “ok” and “cool” are short, simple, and suggestive of an aloof frame-of-mind. i use them regularly and they do not disappoint (me). that’s why i voted for “nah” rather than the other options. “gay” is occasional useful, but i find it and the rest to be a bit too try-hard and butt-hurt.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:54 pm frozenpie77

        I like to use, “noice” too.

        Not “nice,” but “noice.”


  4. on May 31, 2013 at 11:40 am Amanjaw Marcuntte

    “gay” is the only one that fits all 6.


  5. on May 31, 2013 at 11:54 am DdR

    I’ve used gay. While it didn’t get the girl to turn a complete 180 and fall back on my lap, it’s a tactical nuke best launched to counter-act shit-testing, flaking, breaking up, etc. It should be the clear winner. Hats off to El Chief, I’d buy him a beer if we ever met in a bar.

    I really think that “That’s ok, I didn’t want to get you pregnant” when she flakes is gold, Jerry, gold. It implies the sale, it’s non-chalant, it’s considered pushing the envelope.

    Auditioning for a soap opera should be applied only to smarter girls, as I feel that this one might fly over the typical vapid American girl’s head.


  6. on May 31, 2013 at 12:03 pm Anonymous

    My most successful has been “???” By far.


  7. on May 31, 2013 at 12:04 pm John

    What text can best be used when a chick is being psycho about nonsense?


    • on May 31, 2013 at 12:12 pm JironGhrad

      Silence


    • on May 31, 2013 at 1:44 pm cryo

      I have a lot of experience with this. I either just respond with “wut” or type out elaborate responses that have nothing whatsoever to do with whatever the fuck she’s saying. Great fun, you should try it.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 2:07 pm babybluejeans

      Silence or “chill the fuck out.” A guy sent that to my female roommate (she’s cute) and it drove her nuts. Good nuts. Testicles.

      I’ve used it a handful of times since and it’s been the ticket.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 11:15 pm sir vicks

      Silence. Then ‘r u done?’


    • on May 31, 2013 at 11:28 pm walawala

      Spank your ass…

      Then silence


  8. on May 31, 2013 at 12:05 pm Taylor

    My most successful has been “???” By far


  9. on May 31, 2013 at 12:10 pm thealchem1st

    Also, one should not undersell the unfailingly consistent effectiveness of radio silence, referred to in community circles as the “soft next.” Granted that a woman has some form of tangible investment in one’s person, unwavering silence in the wake of a perceived transgression is a nearly foolproof method to regain substantial hand in the matter, while simultaneously conditioning the woman to associate painful emotions with the transgression in question (and eventually any others). A potent insight via the red pill for yours truly was the extent to which women are malleable. Their compliance is entirely contingent upon the overall emotional experience that one is able to create, which is subsequently anchored to himself, be it good or bad. For this reason I believe that preparation and logistics are of great importance, in both courtship, seduction, and punishment. Love is magical, but on the base level of self, both men and women understand only incentives and the fear of loss.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 12:20 pm Anonymous

      Women are incapable of love. They can act only out of self interest.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 1:33 pm embracingourfemininity

        Well that is for sure not true


      • on May 31, 2013 at 1:50 pm Kate

        Yes, it is. Even if a woman falls in love with a man’s “potential,” it is because he has the perceived ability to provide her with a better life. Its not an indictment, its reality.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:38 pm embracingourfemininity

        Well I feel sorry for people incapable of love. I believe it to be the most natural of emotions.

        [CH: Absolutely. Love is as natural as hate. ;) ]


      • on May 31, 2013 at 5:29 pm Anonymous

        Thank you , Kate.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 4:07 am Kate

        That’s not to say it isn’t our version of the concept of love or that a woman can’t have a deep appreciation, affection, and attraction for a man.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 6:25 am Simon Corso

        Aw , freckles . I can’t tell if that’s snark or you’ve been reading too much manosphere. Women are indeed capable of emotional attachment and deep bonds. It’s not the same version of love men experience. But it’s not as bleak as you make it sound.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 7:42 am Kate

        Freckles? Sometimes when I write in haste it comes out harsher than its meant. But I have to say I find it odd that after all this time of trying to get me to accept these things, now that I have and repeat some of it back, people don’t like it.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 2:45 pm n/a

        Kate,

        It’s always good to hear from the mare’s mouth. The men post as expected, but every once in a while a woman writes something of real interest.

        You started here, but stopped too soon. You’re one of the very few females here who has never descended to caricature in her posts — that is, you seem to have ideas of your own, and an evolving view. Neither feminist nor fantasy housewife.

        Let’s hear more when you get the urge. Nothing more happily astringent than a disabused woman making remarks on love.–


      • on June 1, 2013 at 3:12 pm Kate

        Thank you, n/a. You have the gift of compliment :) “On my honor I will try…” :) ps: I hope you caught my last reply to you. It took forever to go through.


      • on June 3, 2013 at 2:26 pm n/a

        Which reply, kiddo?

        WordPress continues to delay our marriage of true minds.


      • on June 3, 2013 at 5:43 pm Kate

        The one where you asked how I was. Ah, one of my favorites:

        Let me not to the marriage of true minds
        Admit impediments. Love is not love
        Which alters when it alteration finds,
        Or bends with the remover to remove:
        O no! it is an ever-fixed mark
        That looks on tempests and is never shaken;
        It is the star to every wandering bark,
        Whose worth’s unknown, although his height be taken.
        Love’s not Time’s fool, though rosy lips and cheeks
        Within his bending sickle’s compass come:
        Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,
        But bears it out even to the edge of doom.
        If this be error and upon me proved,
        I never writ, nor no man ever loved.


      • on June 3, 2013 at 8:32 pm n/a

        Katie that orgy of verys has me a little jealous. ;)


      • on June 4, 2013 at 5:03 am Kate

        I would say, oh you two would be great friends, but I’ve given up on the idea that any one man in my life will like any other man in my life. It just doesn’t seem to work like that. I’m a little afraid to be too happy, but I think we really have a good shot. We both have our eyes open.


      • on June 3, 2013 at 5:13 pm Simon Corso

        ” Freckles? Sometimes when I write in haste it comes out harsher than its meant. But I have to say I find it odd that after all this time of trying to get me to accept these things, now that I have and repeat some of it back, people don’t like it.”

        Yes . Freckles. Or maybe Katieface , anything but Kate or worse yet, the more formal Katherine.

        There are a lot of bitter and hopeless types in the maonsphere and not to diminish their pain or the lessons to be learned from it ,but that’s not you , freckles.

        You’re a dreamer and a believer. You can’t let the anarchistic cynicism of the bitter and broken take that from you.


      • on June 3, 2013 at 5:54 pm Kate

        How very, very sweet. Don’t you worry, though. I am as hopeless a romantic as a red-pill woman can be. That will never change. I have no illusions now, but I still believe. I consider myself the luckiest girl in the world (at the very least, the 48 contiguous states) :)


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:32 pm madvillain

        I understand what he means in the manospherian sense, but I don’t agree with him completely. When you bring a woman thoroughly into your masculine frame, what Krauser calls “deep conversion”, then yes, women fall deeply and madly in love.

        If, IF, that man stays alpha. If he does she will love him forever (five minutes of alpha). Too much beta and a losing of frame, and she’ll fall out of love and feel as if she never loved him at all.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 3:18 pm embracingourfemininity

        Okay, well I don’t know about those things. I am just a woman who knows I have a big heart so capable of loving. I don’t know if that is because of “deep conversion” or anything resembling any type of game. But I agree a woman needs a strong man to take charge.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 3:58 pm madvillain

        Your last line is basically it, but CH and others go into more juicy detail. The women I’ve been with who have looked into my eyes in total soul surrender and deep contentment, that was love, and no one can tell me different.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 4:51 pm popups

        curb your self importance


      • on June 1, 2013 at 9:11 am foolmetwice

        madvillain– May you never fall in love with a high functioning BPD that takes a couple of years to turn. No one will have to ” tell you different”. You’ll get it on your own.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 9:12 am embracingourfemininity

        What is a BPD?


      • on June 1, 2013 at 10:33 am foolmetwice

        borderline personality disorder


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:06 pm Jason

        embracing–

        A BPD woman is like Kryptonite. She’s usually very, very attractive and 100% batshit crazy. We basically lose all our manly powers because her insanity is so strong that we literally cannot do anything in the face of it, not argue with it, not reason with it, not even shape it. The only thing you can do is leave. We guys boast about the importance of keeping a strong frame, and it is important, but BPD is stronger. Therapists don’t even know what to do about BPD women. Their hamsters have grown to shopping-mall proportions. Image the female id the size of the StayPuft Marshmallow Man, and you’ll start to understand.

        I’ve been there. She was, at that time, the strongest love I’d ever felt — and responsible for the most horrible, ruinous, soul-shattering six months of my life. Happy to have escaped. She got knocked up two months later by the next sucker.

        For further reference, see also: Stone, Sharon.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:55 pm embracingourfemininity

        Wow I think I know a few women that fit that description


      • on June 1, 2013 at 4:09 pm foolmetwice

        yes, Jason. That’s pretty much it. But don’t forget the way she looks at you, the ” complete surrender” in her eyes. The way she thrills to your touch. I think they really do feel that way AT THAT MOMENT; or they are very good at fooling themselves. Either way, there’s just no permanence to the feelings. Not even for a day. A strong frame eventually crumbles under the onslaught of a daily F5 tornado of crazy. ” Having a strong frame” presupposes that the other person is at least partially sane. That’s a bad assumption with BPD. As you said, it’s best just to leave.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 5:31 pm Anonymous

        This. When it woman falls out of love with a man she used to love with all of her heart she will hate him with a seething contempt not even a convicting convicted rapist Can inspire. Speier LOL ZZZ. In fact she will easily goes stone cold silent treatment with a man she dated for three years and previously wanted to marry and let firearms behind her back and fucker face


      • on May 31, 2013 at 4:44 pm Matthew King

        Women are incapable of love. They can act only out of self interest.

        This is the slightly classier way to perpetuate the myth, “All women are whores.”

        They “act only out of self interest” when you are incapable of inspiring them to be greater.

        I am coming to think most of the incurable cynicism and many of these insuperable philosophical divides are culturally derived. Either you’ve got class or you don’t. Either you grew up in the trailer park or you didn’t. Either you look at a woman and feel bitterness and contempt and unease, or you see them as merely daffy and misguided and in need of finishing school. It doesn’t help that lowcult has taken over the masscult (cf. Greg Eliot’s “South Park generation”).

        When I hear someone say, “Women are incapable of love,” I have to suggest he go to therapy and figure out which woman did what to scar his vulnerable little heart. That absurd declaration has no truth in my world. I have to conclude he lives on a different planet from mine.

        The thinking and behavior of the typical burnt beta reader makes me just want to say, “No class,” and continue out of earshot from their ghetto-bourgeois piss-and-moan dirges.

        Matt


      • on May 31, 2013 at 5:30 pm Stilicho

        “I am coming to think most of the incurable cynicism and many of these insuperable philosophical divides are culturally derived.”

        That’s your first mistake.

        These “insuperable philosophical divides” are only “insuperable” to someone like you, who believes that a supernatural being created this planet and everything on it. They are only “insuperable” to someone who believes that men have the capability (and an obligation) try tame the modern day American woman of her feral, selfish nature and direct her toward something better.

        But to the men who date, approach, commit to, and marry these selfish sluts — and who then get divorced, financially ruined, and tossed aside — your endless bleatings about transmogrifying women into complaisant, obedient Hausfrau by adopting a manly, virtuous, Greek/Stoic/Roman demeanor are laughable. Unlike you, they’ve seen the enemy up close. And to them, your exhortations are the equivalent of a supply clerk giving tactical advice to the battle-seasoned officers of a Panzergrenadier regiment.

        Put plainly, you are a dipshit.

        It’s your schtick to characterize such men as “burnt bitter betas” and to demean them with a meaningless reference to Scripture, Aristotle or St. Augustine; by now, we get that. (Though you go light on the scripture — except when the spirit moves you. Gotta be careful with the uneducated masses who frequent the CH site, right Matt? Can’t scare them away with too much bible-thumping; better to persuade them to adopt the the Stoic underpinnings of Christianity, rather than Christianity itself. It’s a more subtle tactic, and the effect is the same. Yes, I see the game you’re playing. The more discerning of us see it clearly — and smirk every time we read one of your posts.)

        But more important, you’re simply stupid. Stupid, and possibly dangerous. For you encourage men to stick their heads into a lion’s mouth, and tell them that if they’re just manly enough (That good old Roman virtue! Right Matt?) the lion won’t rip their heads off. And if the lion chooses to do so….well then….it must be because the man in question wasn’t manly enough.

        A cursory reading of your comments is enough to demonstrate one thing: it has been a long, long time, if ever, since you tried to form any sort of relationship with a woman.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 5:47 pm Greg Eliot

        The next time you miss the mark so thoroughly, please do it economically.

        Whether you hate his religion, the way he expresses himself, or the fucking tie he’s wearing, that doesn’t give you the right to define your own terms.

        Calling Matt “stupid” or “dipshit” says far, far… FAR more about the epithet slinger’s intelligence than the intended target of ridicule.

        It is, in fact, the height of stupidity.

        Cock blockers are bad enough. Stop playing the brain block.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 7:07 pm Stilicho

        Oh come on.

        “Steel sharpens steel.” “Real men test one another.” And all that.

        You are Matt’s acolyte. Surely you remember the stock phrases your master uses to justify his own snark and sarcasm?

        Or are you suggesting he can dish it out, but not take it?

        Incidentally, you remind me of the squad leader in “Platoon” who was always lighting Tom Berenger’s cigarette.

        I trust the analogy is clear.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 8:02 pm anonymous

        “Steel sharpens steel.” “Real men test one another.”

        Don’t flatter yourself, clownshoes.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 9:26 pm Greg Eliot

        That’s the trouble with you South Parkers…

        You talk big about “bros” and “men”, but when a man rightfully calls you on your bullshit, or stands up for a bro who he respects, you get all pissy like some dimwit cunt… and then make like respect = toadying.

        Your fathers, such as they were, should have taken you to a ballgame or something… or given you a good feel of his backhand.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 9:33 pm Greg Eliot


      • on May 31, 2013 at 7:21 pm Patriarch

        Why U no Like Matt? U mad?


      • on June 1, 2013 at 12:41 am Jason

        +1000, Stilicho.

        Matt King regularly swings his long alabaster finger in wide arcs, accusing any Y chromosome in sight of a lack of manliness. It’s tiresome and presumptuous. Graft onto this a thin shellacking of holier-than-thou sanctimony, copious amounts of free time, and we have a person who holds the mirror of judgment up to everybody but himself.

        It’s not the mark of someone who’s comfortable in his own masculinity. I’ll presume that everyone here knows what *that* probably means.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 6:31 am Greg Eliot

        asshole says what?

        Pipe down when men are talking, alphie.

        You fairy.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 9:09 am Patriarch

        Jason, you remember that time you begged me to stop fucking with you? I do.
        Don’t be a puss puss.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 11:29 am Jason

        I remember when you weren’t reading for comprehension, and could not understand my “both/and” observation, and consistently misinterpreted it as an “either/or”, even when Neecy literally explained it to you in child’s terms, and then I remember you ranting imaginary bullshit about me (vegan, leftoid, feminist, short, etc).

        Yes, I remember all that.

        Either you’ve eaten six pounds of blueberries to improve brain functioning, Patriarch, or someone smarter than you has hijacked your account, because the quality of your posts have improved immeasurably. You’re welcome.

        Matt King, however, is a different conundrum. A person doesn’t spew six thousand words per day on various Internet manosphere sites without either 1) getting paid or 2) trying to grapple with some pretty serious internal conflicts. I’ll let everyone here figure out what that could be.

        I’d also add that both of you have chosen handles that show your need for omnipotence (king, patriarch). If that’s not a sign of deep insecurity, I don’t know what is.

        That’s my 100 words. Now it’s back to work.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 12:27 pm Patriarch

        The worst type of feminist man boobery is the type that’s unaware of it’s own motivations, Jason.i remember. I remember you White Knighting for the greusome twosome of Neecy and Nicole while they pat you on the head with approving follow up comments. Good boy. I remember you bragging how supposedly badass you were and how you “liked to fight.” I bet your wife allows you act like in real life, Jason. No really, I do.
        You can ignore the fact that you begged me to stop teasing you before but I remember and so do a few other posters.
        You suck the dick of anyone on this board who contradicts anything said that doesn’t fit into your clitdick licking worldview.
        Now go back to work. Your wife will leave you if you fail to make that next payment.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 12:35 pm Jason

        “Either you’ve eaten six pounds of blueberries to improve brain functioning, Patriarch, or someone smarter than you has hijacked your account, because the quality of your posts have improved immeasurably. You’re welcome.”

        I take that back.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 12:53 pm Patriarch

        Evasion noted.
        It’s the fishoil Jason.
        Lower your net carbohydrate consumption.
        Your testosterone will increase.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 12:56 pm whorefinder

        Lmao. Faggy Sweetheart Jason tries to resurrect the last vestiges of his testosterone before he gives up and hires some mandingo to bang his gf for him. So laughable

        Sweetheart Jason once spent an entire night stalking every post I made and claiming that i said I killed people/raped women. It was hilarious how much like tokyojesusfist he was acting.

        Little-dicked beta is obsessed with loving black cock, white knighting for ladies, and denying everything he’s ever done. Such a weak little troll, but great for laughs, especially when he worships at the altars of thwack, Obama, and warpig. lol.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:14 pm Jason

        whorefinder’s imagination is incredible. Let’s admit that much. A severely damaged, but imaginative, troll.

        But he’s still exhibit Z of man’s inhumanity to man.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:43 pm whorefinder

        lol.Gotta love Sweetheart Jason’s denial. So wodnerful to watch his undescended testes crawl even further back up his craw.

        A severely damaged, but imaginative, troll.
        –I know you are, but what am I? :P

        But he’s still exhibit Z of man’s inhumanity to man.
        –And faggy leftists like yourself are exhibits A-Y, biatch.

        The hilarious part is he’s writing this all while simultaneously watching black-cuckhold porn and secretly wishing he walked in on his whore of a mother getting railed by Obama.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 3:18 pm Nicole

        I see the circle jerk is still ongoing.

        My gutt Berthana, still suspects that they are girls. Men simply do not yammer this much, and are not nearly as catty.

        …at least men who’ve had sex this century.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 5:28 pm driveallnight

        Nicole, I recall you mentioning that you live in Israel. But that’s just your torso, right? Because by your pic, it appears one of your buttcheeks might be parked in the West Bank and the other in Gaza.

        How does that work? Do you hold three different residency cards? This is a serious question, as I’m curious how you deal with the checkpoints.

        Thanks in advance,
        driveallnight (your friend)


      • on June 1, 2013 at 5:44 pm Greg Eliot

        Heh, heh… I’m betting her compatriots are very circumspect in their use of tuches aufn tish around her.

        lozozozlzlzlzozozlll


      • on June 1, 2013 at 5:50 pm driveallnight

        It’s really sort of a pity Nicole chose Israel. She’s big enough that the Arab League would’ve likely accepted her as a member.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 1:33 am Nicole

        Drive, just a press-on tip with glitter and sparkles, when someone notes that you and some other girls are engaging in feminine herding or hive behaviors, that is probably not the time to start a hoe-down.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 11:18 am driveallnight

        What would a beast like you know about “feminine”? Although as one of the resident CH megafauna, “herding” would definitely fall under your purview….

        (I’d continue your butchery, but my flensing knife is in the shop.)


      • on June 2, 2013 at 3:08 pm Nicole

        Drive, I apparently wouldn’t know much about femininity from experience, considering people like you never allowed me to be both feminine and safe at the same time.

        …but I can tell you a lot about masculine traits like honor and loyalty.

        The people whose asses you are kissing know nothing of either, and their track record on this very blog tells the tale.

        So you might want to pay more attention to the beast and less to the bitches.


      • on June 3, 2013 at 9:54 am You Fairy

        Can someone explain to me why Greg Eliot is being tolerated and allowed to litter this website with his inane comments? Half of every thread is his garbage posts. He thinks he is being clever, but all he does is take up space by posting retarded junk. There isn’t one worthy comment in this whole thread because of him. It’s just one stupidity after another, and this is coming from a grown man, supposedly.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 7:31 am Matthew King

        No class.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:22 pm corvinus

        Of course atheist betas are going to get screwed over. You just managed to explain better than anyone in a while why atheism makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:31 pm Raul

        sorry but no, christianity is bad for your head


      • on June 2, 2013 at 4:23 pm corvinus

        Raul, what you’re bringing up is a greatly watered-down version of “Christianity” that is infected with the same liberalistic atheism that you yourself approve of. So of course it’s bad for your head.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 3:00 pm Nicole

        I have a different take on this. Women are capable of love if they’ve had sufficient masculine training in it early enough in life. That is, if the father (or father figure) teaches the daughter what love (for a man) is, she will carry that throughout her life. If not then it is highly unlikely that she will get it.

        As a spiritual counselor, I would very much like to believe otherwise, but partly because of the sheer numbers, I cannot. I have seen men who have been literally raped as children by their fathers and have no other significant male role models not only break the pattern and not become rapists or abusers themselves, but somehow miraculously learn to love madly and deeply. They form deep bonds of friendship that one has to deprogram them from with similar intensity to freeing someone from a cult, even after those friends betray them.

        To date, I have never seen a woman endure such and gain the ability to truly love someone, even as a friend. Most become BPD cases, often with a twist of malignant narcissism.

        One guy I know in particular, from Angola, has been through utter hell in his life. His father and most of his male family members were either killed or got messed up from drugs, alcohol, or just being crazy. He ended up having to flee during a war, and along the way was thrown into a Nigerian prison for some years. (Mind you, he had nobody to bring him food or anything, but somehow formed friendships with the other prisoners without having to be anybody’s girlfriend, that kept him alive.) Eventually they let him out, and he arrived in Israel and is making a life here.

        But he says he never felt pain in his life as he did when he fell in love with a woman here, and she dumped him for some stupid reason.

        Never heard such a thing from women. A guy dumps them and it’s like, “Well, I’ve been through worse.”

        Dude who’s been in Nigerian prison writes poetry of love, loss, and longing…woman who has been through some stuff writes, “I will survive.” Both are admirable in their way, but one says deathgrip love and one well, doesn’t.

        Women, I don’t believe have any sort of natural romantic impulse the way that men do. It is probably related to having a lower sex drive. Sex and sexuality just doesn’t mean the same thing for us automatically that it does for men.

        For men, the need for physical affection can be compared to a baby’s need for it and its mother’s milk. So many things are wrapped up in that seemingly mundane act that are crucial to a sense of wellbeing, and in some ways to real physical and emotional health.

        If a girl is taught this by her father (I don’t mean overindulged or coddled, but loved with both authority and protection including protection from one’s own girlish whims) then she gets the gravity of it. She feels the protective arms and words of her father, develops a need for it, and seeks this in her future husband. She sees the dedication, admires it, and aims to emulate it. She learns from both his example and the benefits of his example.

        Women of this generation, even those who don’t live in trailer parks, are not getting strong male presence, so they naturally behave like the concubines in a giant harem whenever there’s a regime change…no particular loyalty to the one who came before. It’s all about who’s got the power and resources at the moment, and not about the principles.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 8:18 am Patriarch

        “Spritiual advisor” huh?
        Maybe you could advise your own spirit as it takes upon itself a quest to escape the layers upon layers of blubber that it’s trapped under like some sort of McDonalds inspired level of Dantes Inferno.
        Keep up the “meaningful” post wall mental diversion.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 3:14 pm Nicole

        Patty, first of all, pics or stfu.

        Second, if you manage to survive what I have and still have a perfect physique, then you get to talk some trash.

        If you don’t post pics then simply tell me what it is like to bleed to death.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 5:08 pm Patriarch

        Bahahaha alright queen butthurt.
        Rest assured, even without pictures, I understand what processed carbs do to a body and what the gym is for.
        I’ve been through the same things as you,
        The yearly coming and going of the McRib,
        the arrival of the double stuffed oreo, and Chef Boyardee making the larger family sized cans, and yet my willpower remains, you know that thing you endlessly harp on? Talking about strength and doing what needs to be done are two completely different things, Mumbo Jumbo, and if you lived in this world instead of your fantasy world you’d understand how silly you seem to us.


      • on June 3, 2013 at 3:56 pm Nicole

        Patty please, for the love of masculinity, do you actually disagree with my post or my existence? Which is it?

        If it’s my existence, then stop trying to convince anyone that you’re being rational. You’re just a hysterical bitch crying about not getting respect that you haven’t earned from me.

        Latch off.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 6:28 pm Ovid

        Bravo Stilicho. More economically you could have simply said “Jesus Christers ad leones.”


      • on June 2, 2013 at 6:49 am Greg Eliot

        Proverbs 28:1 – The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.

        The most stalwart and courageous people I have known, both men and women, have been Christians.

        South Park generation snarkers? Meh… not so much.

        There’s your Sunday lesson, kid.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 3:20 pm Nicole

        I’m sure it takes a lot of courage to burn down entire towns and shoot innocent women and children in the head because someone else in the town was accused of insulting a “white” woman.

        The question is whether or not such acts are depraved or righteous, regardless of the religion of the person who commits them.

        Jesus may forgive the murderous Christian, Muslim, Jew, Vodounsi, Buddhist, or Hindu, or worshiper of FSM, but I do not.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 5:15 pm Patriarch

        That’s funny, Nicole.
        Isn’t explosive moments of violence the only thing your kind understands?
        Besides, you have no right to complain of oppression.
        You obviously get all the food you want…


      • on June 3, 2013 at 3:58 pm Nicole

        Patty, I don’t worry that you’re prone to any kind of violence, much less explosive.

        You have to get out of your chair to commit any.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 5:33 pm Anonymous

        Which one?? All of them.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 7:35 am embracingourfemininity

        Very true


  10. on May 31, 2013 at 12:20 pm DavidVS

    A nice one for initiating conversation is “So, why are you worth talking to today?”

    It asks her to qualify herself while giving her the benfit of the doubt.


  11. on May 31, 2013 at 12:22 pm Dslap

    I actually like to use “ghey” instead. Dropping hukt on fonix game on top of it.


  12. on May 31, 2013 at 12:30 pm LW

    what happened to “it’s complicated”? That’s my favorite, by far.


    • on June 1, 2013 at 8:46 am Patriarch

      I use “it’s complicated” along with some other favorites:
      Ha.
      You know it
      Wow
      Yep yep
      I see.
      Hmmm
      Alright.
      Couple this with silence and or slow responses.
      It isn’t so much the word itself as it is the meaning behind it. I’m not entirely convinced women see the face value definition of a word nearly as important as the attitude or confidence and domination behind it.
      A nervous fat nerd laughing at his own jokes comes off as “creepy”
      Compared to Alec Baldwin laughing at his own jokes. I’m not saying you have to be a rich alpha like Alec but you do need to command his demeanor as much as you can to just be assumed to be higher value by her and suddenly every response commands her attention. The hotter she is the more you’re going to have work to break her. Sadly most guys who even get the courage to open a hot girl puss out at the first sign of defensive bitchyness rearing it’s ugly head.


  13. on May 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm Anon

    Can someone please explain to me Great Books For Men’s Deal. Is this guy a troll or just sincerely retarded.

    Don’t mean to cause a stir, it’s just been that I’ve been lurking here for years, and this guy tends to disrupt alot of the intellectual, insightful comments I read.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 1:52 pm backdoor man

      GBFM is a comedic genius. I really do wonder what he is like in person. He can’t be nearly as cool as he is in print.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:27 pm dfg

        He’s not writing comedy. The stuff he writes is deadly serious.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:47 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        da wise man knows himself 2 be a fooool lzozlzoz –william shakespearez lzozlzzozlozlzozzol

        if u arez going 2 tell the peopel thee trth, be funny, or dey will kill youzzl zlzolzzlozlzozlzz


      • on May 31, 2013 at 3:48 pm Simon Corso

        A little sugar makes the medicine go down easier.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 3:57 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozoozoz

        sur sigarz sugar tom cruise jacking offofof off

        lzozozoozzozoz


    • on May 31, 2013 at 2:16 pm Alden

      GBFM is actually an intelligent and thoughtful guy. He has some good points to make in diagnosing modern society’s problems. He just hides his thoughts behind the amusing schtick of poor spelling and lolzozlozlzolzozl. I recommend reading a few of his posts on various threads thoroughly and you’ll start to see the theme.

      [CH: GBFM knows that the genius discovered with hard work is more illuminating than the genius given freely.]


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:28 pm anon

        Thanks for the replies…..but what is this guy’s stchick….what’s his purpose of typing like he has Parkinson’s….. I mean what type of comedy is he trying to achieve..parody….’

        sorry, ive been reading these boards for a while, and this guy seems to come off as a ‘try-hard’


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:40 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzoozzooz

        dear anaonee anon
        i think dat my predicament
        is because of my ritalin and adderoll presistciouionz prescriptotionsz
        which allow me to see thingsz
        dat u cannot see
        and hear thingz
        dat u can not hear
        and know thingz
        dat you cannot know

        and den called by christ i foud myself
        needing to share what i saw heard and kenww

        zlzlzllzoz

        what is da tsory of da gbfm?

        lozozzoz when i was in third gradezz i axsked my teacher, “what is da federal resevre?”

        she sent me to da princicple!

        so i asked him, “is it federal? is it a governemnt entity? is it a reserve? does it actaully have any moneyz or does it just create debts an dbruened da eoplz taxpayer with them lzozzlzoz?”

        he sent me to the uspeirnetdenient

        so i asked himz “what gives them the moreal authorty to crate out of thin air that whihc i must labor for, and give it to tehir firendz to deocnstruct westetern civilzizioaatonz?”

        he send me to the chool nurse who prescievedbed me ritalaizinz and addeoeorloozlzozl lotass pillz lzozlzl for asking stooooopid quetsuzonzznz znzozlololzo

        so i aske dteh nurse, “how is it that the cenrtal bank can create debt out of thin air and den cgahagr inetrest on it funding wars and fmeinsisnzmz and bostionrtoonz? and aborititonz? and why do christians never speak out agianst abortion, nor sosodomy, nor the detah of marriage and fatherhood? Why do chcistians instead kneel down before game, as if moisisntening buttcocked womenz’ gina walls is the greatest glory higher dan chirst ieven? lzozlzlozoozo?”

        and the school nurse injected me with a ritalin addeorlloololzolzoz cocktail

        and it felt good goodd godod and made me go lzozozozlzozlzl all dayz longz zlzlzlzoozlz

        and ever since den

        i talked like thiss and shsook and shaked when i typex d zlllzozlzozl as i get eixicieted dat i see and hear and see thingsz that noboy else see nor hears

        for tehy are of little fiath lzozlloz

        but jesus jeusus he saves me
        and tellz me dat while the gamerz win on erth in moisuienetig da ssoccked buttcoked women’z gina wallsz with tehir lies and decpetions and degradgations
        christ tells me dat my ideas win
        in his kingdom of ideealz idealz

        and dat is da story of da GBFM

        since yu akeskekd lzozozlozz

        have a niczozoe day!! lzozlzolzoz

        i am with oyuyo alwlaolzlzlzozlzzlzooaalayayzzlozzlozzlzo

        me and ross douthathyt douthahatzlzozlzzozzlzassahatzasshatlzozlzozlzozzlzozlzo


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:43 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Try doing what I do. Read them to yourself in Beavis’ voice, doing his sugar-fueled “Cornholio” fugues. Protip: Close your office door first, or everybody’s going to come beg you to send them whatever it is that’s got you laughing so hard.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 11:43 pm whorefinder

        Damn, how old are you? Beavis & Butthead? What’s next, a reference to One Day at a Time? Or maybe Amos & Andy?


      • on May 31, 2013 at 3:09 pm Ronin

        He’s kind of like a James Joyce who writes about Econ. & Ladybutts.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 3:54 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lozozozoz

        Econ. & Ladybutts is da title of a new class I ma am apply to teach at HARVAR D MBA SCHOOL! Lzozozozo

        ECON & LADYBUTTZ 101 Lzozooz

        hey da GBFM will be teahcing a class on modern eocnomicz at HARVARD NEXT SEMESTERZZ!!!!

        I hope dat da MIT Eocnomists all drop in to my lectures erudite schoalrly lecturezzz!!!!

        today da professor GBFM would like to lecture on INFLATION lzozozz and eocnomizz INCENTIVEZ lzozlzlz

        once upon a times $50,000 would buy yo u a nice house a nice wife two cars and three kids who you could play baseballs with and raise to be nice girls and nice boyz zlzoozoz

        today $1,000,000 will buys you an cassocked assockccoked, embittered, doused, deosueld and bernanenkied butthexed dfeminsistasz who will take %70 70% of oyiry assets in divroce court as ada dirvroce industries forces men to pay for past use oif a pussiezzes which is why da enoeteconths hate prostiutuitions as it does not make man pay for past pussy uyse but only present pussy use and da neococonths hatchet comepetitzzinonszz lzozlzlzoz, and dat $1,000,000 will be used to pay your wives dirvocre attorney and fund her future as socking sesisosns dat day got her hooked on in college during da prrima noctae asosckingszz seeisosnsnsns lzozlzozozo and den da $1,000,000 will be whittled down furthers buying presscirtption drugs for your dumbed down drugged up kids who you never get to see because ebernenekifiers seized den as poker chips in da fed’s wealth transfer games zlzozlzl

        so now you see da definition of butthex, wealth-rttrannsfeeringz INFLATION lzozozlzlzoz

        HOW DA FED HIDES INFLATION:

        da fed hides inflation in many, many ways

        frist of all, da government always lies about the true inflation lozozozl but you see it at the gas pump as day pump and dump your future wife in college deosuling and ebenrnkaifiying her

        A LOT OF INFLATION is hidden in your future wife’s buttonhole lzozlzoz

        with all da extra dolzlrz zlzozo day print dollars and fund feminism and sassockcing lessons as socking seminars assockcing instructions on da college campus where day can butthext and deosul your future wife and make her loyal first and foremost to da bottom line lzozozl da BOTTOM line lzozozoz da BOTTOM UTTHOLE line lzozozlzl programming her to seize your assets to tempt you into marriage, seize your assets and spy on you, and then forward all your emails to da FED alongside all of your assettsts ASS tests ASSsetts zlzozzzlz BOOTOTOM LINE BOTTOM LINE ASSests zlzozozllzozoz

        once upon a time a man couple support a family and a wife and kids and rise them proper moral decent lzozllzoz

        but now, due to da FED’s massive inflation which they hide in your wife’s buttonhole during secretive tucker max rheyme with godlmans sax secretly taped buttehxting sessions, she will be more loyal to da shopping channels and her sista’s and the CIA’s cosmo magazine zlozozzllzzol and unloyal not loyal to family, god , man, religion, and thus she will insatiate initiate over 80% of divorce as the FED whispers to her that she will get her uhusdbansds assetsts to fund future as socking as socking buttonhole cockas sessions that they addickecter adduced adDICKted her to in college lzoolzlzozo

        and da fed gets a gut

        as they must convert

        worthless less than zero fiat debt

        into physical assetttss

        by seizing property and lifer and liberty form da betas

        operating through their wive’s buttholios

        where they dhid allda inflation zlozozozlz

        DANTE and MILTON noted the same thing, so if you do not believe da GBFM, take it up with DANTE and MILTON asslcocen zlzzzl assclowns zlzozlzlzo

        lzozozozzlzlzlzozl

        wonce upon a time mens wents 2 church 2 find a good wownenez lzozlzlzloz to be a wife and mother and faithful honor cherish lzozlzzozlolzozlz

        today woemnz go 2 churrhc 2 find a beta or gammamale to pay for their three children forrm three fatehrs who pumped dand dudmped theier zazzez afetr asszzcockcing them lzozlzlzlzo

        lzozozozlzlzolzolz

        once uppoineez a time da dollars was backed by gold

        today it is backed by porn as emerikaz went off the gold/god standtdthedth and went onto da iron porn standadtdth lkzozozzlz

        HARVARD UNIVERSITY JUST INTRODUCED A NEW COURSE!!
        ECON & LADYBUTTZ 101 Lzozooz
        Upper-Level Feminist Business 401: During the semester we will learn how to optimize Alpha Fucks and Beta Bucks, as we are buttcoked by “alphas” and then go forth into the corporate-state to buttcock betas out of their assettsts (buttcocking their asstettss so to speak lzozlzoz) buttcoki dem outta der assettts in divorce curt, entitle progapms, corproate sexual harrassment suits, and guilting betas and gelding them with the “pay gap” myth, all the while complaining about the glass ceieling even as we rise to very top of the fiat debt empire while da menz are unemployed and crusedhesd and enslaved bwloe zlozlzlzozozl. We will transfer teh assetts to the central banks and bernankifiers for teh centyral banks can only create debt-based fiat dollarz which are worth less than nothing, and thus need d awomenz movement to go forth and buttcock and guilt betas into working working working for a hope to lick our std-addled, strecthed-out bungholes lzozlzololzozo. We will examine why betas do not like this setup, and how we can shame them into marriage and slaving away in corproate jobs while we cock hold the alphas and cukhold da betas zlzololzlzlozozololzlzolz. homework will consist of getting buttcocked by a buttccker while mainitaing a roster of at least 20 beta oribters to reguallry buy one meals so that they will be well fed for the buttcocking later that evening. this will prepare tda womenz for bigger game, whnce they get betas to buy them homes and cars, and then dun future buttcockings with aplphas via alimony and child support lzzllzzlzozozozozo. sample exam questions will be, “what does tucker butthexter max wheym with? klzozolzolzolzo


      • on May 31, 2013 at 9:11 pm Stig

        This.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 4:30 pm Anonymous

        ‘sry staring at ladybutts’ could be a great distracted text line


      • on June 1, 2013 at 9:24 am Patriarch

        Try hard? Try hard is only relative to coming off as outcome dependent in an interaction with girls. Dont be one of those guys constantly over anal-yzing everyone for their quantum shift in status.You ever watched a group of frat brothers act like idiots? I’d advise you watch slinging that around in the real world. Not everyone is a fan of GBFM. If you don’t like it then that’s where you stand. I used to do that, worried how I and the other guys around me appeared. Move past that shit. Do or do not do what you like.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:45 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        A BIG SHOUTOUT TO DA MIGHTY HEARTITSTEES!!!!

        hey heartrsitetz!!! you are mention ined this book:

        http://www.amazon.com/Men-Strike-Boycotting-Fatherhood-ebook/dp/B00APDFXKO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1370032830&sr=8-1&keywords=marriage+strike

        YOU ARE IN DA INDEX AN D MENTIONED IN DA PAGESZZ!!!

        lzozozzzozozo

        such is the nature of our day
        dat the heartsitest writez millions of volumes
        with millions of followersz
        and millions of fans
        and millions of links and trackbacks and readerz
        and millions of viewsz

        and a lady gets a book deal
        for mentioning the GREAT HEATRIETSZZE
        twice lzozzoozoz

        as time goes on heartietssz will have booksz of his own
        mark my wordz
        and den a couple books next to each other
        and den half a ch shelf
        and den a full shelf
        of “da colected workz o f da hearrietstee chateau”
        with a forward by the gbfmz zlzozozlzozo zlzozlzo

        i am working on my own book too:

        lzlzozlzoolzozl
        by
        gbfm

        lzozoozozozoz

        [CH: I’m tickled pink and sticky!]


    • on May 31, 2013 at 2:34 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      yes anon i feel da same way too
      i think dat heartieszte should ban most every commenter here
      other dan da gbfm
      as i hate it when so many of you post your sttoopid shit
      and interrupt the intellectual, insightful i am having with
      me
      da gbfm
      zlzlzlzozlzolzolzozozozoozozl


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:36 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        i know &EXACTLY* what u mean gbfm
        lozozozolzozozozzozo


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:51 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        i fuguredd you would undertstsand i louvz you man luvz you gbfmf


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:52 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        i luvz u too, ders nothing gay about it, not that therez’ anything worng with being gayz lzozozoz


    • on May 31, 2013 at 5:04 pm Ted

      you’re new here aren’t you


    • on May 31, 2013 at 5:51 pm Matthew King

      Can someone please explain to me Great Books For Men’s Deal. Is this guy a troll or just sincerely retarded.

      GBFM is a comedic genius. … He’s not writing comedy. The stuff he writes is deadly serious. … genius … you’re new here aren’t you … Beautiful. Brought a tear to me eye. … I fucking love you … Everybody read GBFM carefully. It is no joke. …

      Happy to. Whenever someone tells you you’re too daft or uninitated to understand the finer points of gibberish, read this story: http://www.andersen.sdu.dk/vaerk/hersholt/TheEmperorsNewClothes_e.html

      HTH.

      Also invest in an Occam’s Machete, keep it sharpened. That will help cut through the weeds. The acres and acres of weeds.

      Finally remember the discernment of the masses, who love celebrity diving shows and Dan Brown novels movies based on amusement park rides. “No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public.”

      Or:

      Matt


    • on May 31, 2013 at 7:24 pm Patriarch

      GBFM will teach you everything you need to know.
      By God, he’ll teach you how to piss.


    • on June 1, 2013 at 12:53 pm Steve Lawrence (@sharialawfan)

      “It’s self-illustrating. A text that is made needlessly difficult to read, like one that requires you to solve a puzzle or consult a dictionary for every word, is good for you. Now, I don’t know that for sure, but having to grope and guess a bit is part of the idea; presumably that bafflement – and having to look up the words, which are still not very clear in context – is good for me.

      And again, “don’t ask again for your own benefit” suggests that any explanation would only make the text less baffling and frustrating, hence less mental health-promoting, so for your own benefit, don’t ask.”

      “Ergodic literature promotes mental hormesis.”


    • on June 1, 2013 at 1:53 pm AlmostAnonymous

      Do you actually read his comments? Seriously read them? If not, try again and perhaps you’ll find the answer you’ve left unstated.


  14. on May 31, 2013 at 12:43 pm The Best All-Purpose Alpha Male Text Response | Viva La Manosphere!

    […] heartiste.wordpress.com […]


  15. on May 31, 2013 at 12:46 pm worldclassic

    one vote for “gay,” but I’ll also submit one of my own personal favorites: “lol.” note that the period sends a completely different message than “lol” or “haha” or any such variant, so some calibration is involved. for example:

    HER: ya I get lots of messages from guys telling me im attractive haha
    HER: jk I actually dont think im attractive at all
    YOU: lol

    HER: *paragraphs of rambling womanliness directed toward you*
    YOU: lol.

    I’m also a fan of “nice”


  16. on May 31, 2013 at 12:52 pm KidB

    I really like:
    “ghey”. I’m going to have to use that.

    “nah” is gold. That got my vote.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 3:04 pm Dslap

      You’re welcome. And thank you for my new combo, “nah…ghey”.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 9:50 am Seraph

        Well done…


    • on June 1, 2013 at 2:53 pm Anonymous

      Don’t say things are gold. That’s Jewish


  17. on May 31, 2013 at 12:52 pm Sidewinder

    Related to text game, here is the update from an online dating game question from a couple weeks ago:

    I asked for advice concerning a girl who politely cancelled meeting me because she had something going on with another guy and wanted to see where it went. I wasn’t sure how to respond because it was generally polite, and since we had never met, I felt any kind of negative response would indicate butt-hurtness.

    YaReally agreed and suggested that I stay positive and say something casually light and humorous. I responded to her “good luck. Let me know when you’re ready to party with a real man”

    She responded last night “so…..I’m ready to party with a real man. :-) Let me know if you’d like to meetup for a drink sometime.” Any suggestions on how to close this one out? My thought is to ignore the previous cancellation, but I want to somehow motivate her to prove her interest to me at the same time. Advice?


    • on May 31, 2013 at 3:21 pm Sidewinder

      My response: “might be free mid week. send me a pic. I don’t remember what you look like”


      • on May 31, 2013 at 3:52 pm Lara

        If she is smart, she’ll send you a picture of someone else, and try to catch you in a lie.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 4:51 pm YaReally

        1) don’t do this, it’s a good idea in other circumstances but it’s over gaming in this circumstance because she’s throwing herself at you now by coming crawling back. It’s not the same as if she was a bitch or aloof or needed to be worked on still. In certain situs this is definitely a good plan tho.

        2) she won’t send a fake pic because she wants his cock in her, she doesn’t want to “catch him in a lie”, she wants him to fuck her brains out. How does a girl not recognize when another girl wants dick? lol


    • on May 31, 2013 at 4:47 pm YaReally

      “Who’s this?”

      lol, no, just kidding. That’s only for bitchy/cocky girls, she doesn’t deserve you being a dick lol

      This is a done deal now. Don’t over-game it, invite her out for drinks this weekend. She’s opening her window and throwing herself out there, admitting she wants your dick in as forward a way as she can in this situ. Let her know she can trust you to be a man and make it happen and arrange a situation where it can “just happen”

      Don’t bring up her flaking or the other guy at all right now. If you want, you can do that on the actual date face to face over drinks and tease her a bit about him, that’s fine that’ll build attraction and make her want to qualify and invest in you to make up for it, but if you do it BEFORE you’re face to face, you’re risking triggering ASD and embarrassment and she isn’t attracted to you enough to plow thru that. She’s coming back to you kind of embarrassed/humbled, don’t kick her while she’s down or she’ll probably just back off entirely.

      It CAN work out to tease her before meeting up, but it’s just not the optimal move. You CAN win a poker hand playing the 20%-chance-to-win move but if you have the option to play the 80% chance move, play that instead.

      Pounce fast. You can do something alpha like “Bar Name. Saturday night, 7pm. We’ll grab a drink and I’ll make sure you don’t own 7 cats.” She should jump on the opportunity. You can probably bang this out this weekend if the logistics aren’t terrible. Ideally pick a bar near your apartment or at least have a solid plan for how to get from there to your apartment. I usually do a drink or two and when it’s on just say “I have a bottle at my place lets just go drink there instead of wasting money here”

      Have a plan for how to get from the meetup location to your place. Will she have her car? Do you mind leaving yours parked overnight? It’s better to go out of your way to pick her up so she doesn’t have a car to worry about, when you have too many drinks and have to cab it to your place (or hers and she can drive you to your car in the morning). Etc etc plan this Day 2 out, google “Day 2″ for ideas of what logistics to focus on sorting out. Don’t just meet up at some bar in the middle of nowhere that ends up cockblocking you. A shithole little pub by your house within walking distance (call it your “favorite little pub” or say “I’ve never been to it before but always been curious what its like, let’s check it out”) is 100000000x better than a fancy upscale “impressive” lounge downtown that’s harder to transition from (finding cabs, worrying about parking cars or leaving them overnight, etc). In fact a shithole pub gives you reason to leave lol “lets get out of here and drink at my place, I had no idea this place was so sketchy!”

      Good luck, rock that shit ASAP. Don’t overgame.


  18. on May 31, 2013 at 12:56 pm Sidewinder

    “you done?”


    • on May 31, 2013 at 2:23 pm MattDamon

      second that.

      also, quite hard to translate some of the responses to russian, but i often use this. and blank “ok” which essentially conveys the same meaning – i’m not amused.


  19. on May 31, 2013 at 12:56 pm Born Again Alpha

    “Send me a pic”

    Wait for angry response or insult.

    “Thx”


    • on May 31, 2013 at 12:58 pm INTJ

      LOL that is good.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 1:15 pm red texas

      I mentioned in passing that this girl I was starting to date should send me a pic. I gave no details on what I wanted, but the whole conversation was predominantly about sex. Within 24 hours lots of pics were coming through. Women use the pussy power like we dont know what theyre doing. Once you are in single mom land they throw it around like pie in a highschool food fight. It’s almost pathetic. The ones most likely to throw it at you and make a big deal out of it (talk it up, dirty it up, make it the center of attention) are the ones most likely to close the pussy store once they know youve bought in. They are also the most likely to have little else to offer so sex is a fantastic tool to distract from their other qualities or lack thereof.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 3:37 pm WhoCares

      Correction… send me a pic OF YOUR ASSHOLE.

      Now, done. ;D


  20. on May 31, 2013 at 12:57 pm INTJ

    “Are you auditioning for a soap opera?” and “tl;dr” are the best. Dismissive amusement ftw.

    “Nah” and “gay” are pretty good too.

    Most of the other responses seem to be trying too hard.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 5:19 pm Testicles

      I thought I was the only one thinking that.


    • on June 1, 2013 at 9:49 am Seraph

      I was thinking of shortening it to:

      “Auditioning?”

      It is short, and ambiguous enough to get a woman confused.

      When she responds with any sort of confusion or question, then respond with…

      “For a soap opera?/after school special?/Bitching with the Stars?”


  21. on May 31, 2013 at 1:00 pm newlyaloof

    “tl;dr” – see this about a dozen times; never guessed what is was or cared enough to search for a glossary, but I may as well ask it now. wft is that?


    • on May 31, 2013 at 1:02 pm Anon

      TL;dr stands for ‘too long, didn’t read’……..the M.O. for GBFM’s posts


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:36 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        klzozozllzoz

        when she texted me
        TL;dr
        i thought she meant
        too long, didn’t rock gbfm’s losttass cockasz in my gina hoelozlozlz zozzlozlz


    • on May 31, 2013 at 1:05 pm Anonymous

      Too Long, Didn’t Read.


  22. on May 31, 2013 at 1:04 pm Reader’s Fanfare: What I hear when I read “GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM)” | Lucius Somesuch

    […] of which:  I vigorously dissent from the view that “bring da movies” is obsolescent.  Who watches Ingmar Bergman on streaming internet video?  Damnit all, I want […]


  23. on May 31, 2013 at 1:09 pm Inane Rambler

    I’m sorry, but “gay” sounds butthurt.

    “Nah” all the way.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 1:48 pm Marky Mark

      I have to agree that ‘gay’ sounds butthurt… soap opera audition is good b/c it is funny as well


    • on May 31, 2013 at 2:07 pm Lara

      It did not sound butthurt the way it was originally used on here. IIRC, it was the one word response to a long, dramatic email by a girl. I think it would work best, if you already had the upper hand in the relationship, had disappointed her in some minor way, and she was overreacting. Under those circumstances, it would be an alpha response.
      It is not nearly as effective for a girl who isn’t that into you to begin with. It will probably only be funny the first time, so use it wisely.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 2:52 pm Marky Mark

        The question is Lara… If a girl isn’t ‘that’ into a guy to begin with, is there REALLY anything he can do to change her mind?? I don’t mean a girl playing hard to get or not trying to seem too interested, but a girl that feels zero attraction from the start.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 5:18 pm Testicles

      gay


    • on May 31, 2013 at 5:28 pm YaReally

      “gay” is just for calling her out on bullshit that she KNOWS is bullshit. It’s like saying “I know you know you’re being stupid right now, and I know you know that I know, and I’m calling you out on that…get your shit together ASAP.”

      It’s not an all-purpose response, it’s for a specific circumstance and that specific circumstance makes it not come off butthurt like it does in every other circumstance.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:30 pm corvinus

        This. “Gay” works like a charm in specific circumstances, while “nah” sounds more aloof overall.


  24. on May 31, 2013 at 1:43 pm Mr. Mitchell

    ‘right’


  25. on May 31, 2013 at 1:54 pm Kate

    If its all-purpose you’re looking for, I submit “baking soda.” The response to the subsequent query of confusion could be quite fun and creative.


  26. on May 31, 2013 at 1:57 pm dannyfrom504

    I use the pregnant line all the time. After I make a girl laugh, I compliment her with, “you keep smiling like that you might end up pregnant. Never had it fail.

    It’s sexual validation and too over the top to take seriously.


  27. on May 31, 2013 at 2:00 pm maurice

    Not a text, but these are in the mode of Skittles Man- another CH classic. Skittles Man as I recall was contrasted with $15K for Wedding Flowers Man in the same post- the point being extravagance/parsimony of gifts being inversely correlated with love in response. And Skittles Man was uncovered on a website females used to complain about their exes- at which two women discovered they were complaining about the same dude!


  28. on May 31, 2013 at 2:06 pm the latent sadist

    God this is the perfect post for me today. Read this text exchange i had with a very cute little 19 year old. Backstory is i met her, arranged a meet,then on the day of… she invited other people/played games. I ignored the living shit out of her and truly wrote her off. I refuse to chase any girl. But the following was pretty golden.. and i have the chateau to thank. She texts me last night.

    (Note the response times)

    (Her) 10:04.pm: Come hang out with me and ****

    (Me) 11:29.pm: Yo

    (Her) 11:30.pm: What are you doing

    (Me) 12:19am: Um what

    (Me) 12:28am: I wanted to know if you were down to hang out with me and ***** but never mind

    (Me) 12:43am: Its complicated

    (Her) 12:48 am: “Its okay”

    (Me) 12:51am: 8======D ~ ~ ~

    (Her) 12:54 am: Woahh I didn’t expect that

    (Me) 12:59 am: I know right

    (Her) 1:02 am: We should hang out sometime. Just us.

    (Me) 1:18am: You think so

    (Her) 1:21 am: yes

    (Me) 1:42am: Convince me

    (Her) 1:47am: You want me to convince you to hang out with me?

    (Me) 2:15am: Just means its up to you

    I felt unsure oafter her question… and i was pretty exhausted. I tried to respond as neutral as possible. Not back tracking, but not completely squashing the exchange. That was it.

    So this morning she sends:

    *I would like to hang out with you but if you dont want to then that’s fine*

    Say what you will about the ending, but the terse, assholish texting got her to invest and try to get me out. Im pretty pleased.

    [CH: Well played, right up until the end. But you already noted that, so I won’t belabor the point. When she said “we should hang out sometime. just us.” that was her hamster suddenly imploding on itself. she knew she overplayed her hand, and now she was in chaser mode. That was your cue to stop fucking around. a simple “ok” would have sufficed.

    Your worst mistake (and in the scheme of things, it wasn’t really a big mistake) was when you said “just means its up to you”. That line sounds like you’re backpedaling and worried that you over-reached, just like she worried the same about herself earlier. If you’re gonna go alpha, don’t go half-assed. Go full ass, or no ass at all.]


    • on May 31, 2013 at 4:06 pm the latent sadist

      @ heartiste

      thanks. for what its worth, i fully understood that this could have been the case…that maybe should just seal it up and say ok. Im not calibrated and experienced enough to be certain that this was a sincere hamster overdrive .i had this lingering thought that if I comply and say “ok” or whatever that she would just disappear….happy to have roped me in and gotten the validation of me wanting to see her again. BUt i definitely also considered that i was overgaming.

      Its a tightrope…to be sure.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 4:19 pm Matthew King

      So much subjunctive moodiness, so much hidden apology. “If … maybe … could … up to you … it just means …” Your mode is imperative and declarative and exclamative, son. Shut off the whiny up-talk.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 4:34 pm the latent sadist

        Fair enough. I acknowledged as much


      • on May 31, 2013 at 4:39 pm the latent sadist

        Keep in mind i very decisevly arranged a meet with her soon after we met last week. Three msgs. Hey. Lets meet up at xx. Cool. Then she fucked around. So this is me not calibrating properly…being to guarded, and underestimating her seriousness and engorging twat. (admittedly…its too ball-in-her-courtish)


      • on May 31, 2013 at 5:12 pm Matthew King

        Right. The problem isn’t so much the texts themselves but the attitude behind those texts. You seem reluctant to say what you please and not give a shit how she takes it. So the cock-o-glyph (and “Convince me”) comes out of left field at her, and you half take it back in the very next reply.

        Brave of you to present yourself plainly here and to accept criticism without attitude. That’s the quickest path to improvement.

        Vaya con Priapus, hermano.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 6:24 pm the latent sadist

        Ha yeah dude thx. I got no ego here were all learning. Ive blown so many seductions lol its finally starting to feel like a video game…that detached feeling of just acknowledging where you’re at and pushing a bit further everytime.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 5:17 pm YaReally

      “(Me) 1:42am: Convince me

      (Her) 1:47am: You want me to convince you to hang out with me?”

      Her hamster exploded here. After you fuck her, when youre debriefing her and ask her when she decided she wanted to fuck you, she’ll reference this txt.

      “Your worst mistake (and in the scheme of things, it wasn’t really a big mistake) was when you said “just means its up to you”. That line sounds like you’re backpedaling and worried that you over-reached, just like she worried the same about herself earlier. If you’re gonna go alpha, don’t go half-assed. Go full ass, or no ass at all.]”

      This. Solid read CH. OP went incongruent here by backpedalling, should’ve pressed forward and taken the lead after shaking her hamster up. If this were a boxing match, he ducked under a haymaker and landed a rock-solid punch that got the other guy dizzy and defenseless up against the ropes but then stopped punching and told the guy “well? Aren’t you going to knock yourself out for me?”

      It’s okay to chase when the window of opportunity is open. That’s not beta, that’s knowing what you want and taking it like a boss. Don’t let your ego/pride fuck up situations that can be turned around easily into a lay, like this one. You can’t Next a girl who hasn’t fucked you, that’s her Next’ing YOU, and you should, for the sake of learning and improving your skillset, try turning tough situations around. You won’t be landing the hottest girls if you bail at the slightest shit-test, they’re not going to just spread their legs for you and beg you to stick it in. They want to know that you’re a guy who unapologetically takes what he wants against all odds.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 6:20 pm the latent sadist

        Thx man yeah i completely agree. I was conscious of the fact that i was backpedaling..but i truly wasnt sure what to.do….you confirmed what i suspected. Im still learning to spot when its time to drop the banter and capitalize on the window….without appearing eager. Heartiste was on, i coulda just said ok. Then arranged the meet some afternoon prior. As it is she sent me that last text and i just said “its cool im down” like 3 hours later. Hope this is good enough and i.plan on just getting her out in my hood tmrw night.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 11:41 pm walawala

        You can’t next a girl you haven’t banged.

        yes.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:02 pm the latent sadist

        +1 with the 19 yr old. A hearty thanks to the chateau.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 11:40 pm walawala

      Great exchange. The last line is passive, nothing’s ever up to her.

      But there are no real mistakes if the overall exchange is alpha.

      Girls get a feeling they don’t analyze each and every word the way we do here.

      I’ve had weak exchanges and banged the girl.

      I’ve had great exchanges and didn’t.

      Girl I’m banging and I who have had major falling out seems back in chaser mode.

      She comes to party I’m at last night after I blew her off.

      I game her, then at some point, spank her ass. She suddenly perks up with a mixture of shock, embarrassment, and intrigue.

      Me: “I hope there was a photographer around, that would be my new profile photo”.

      Later I suggested we get out of there but she had to work early the next morning.

      me: “Ok”….disappear.

      Later I sent a simple text:

      Me: Meow.

      Her; 1 second later ‘yes’

      That exchange means nothing. I send nonsense, she acknowledges it. But on an attraction level it means she’s thinking of me.

      So overall, it’s about the feelings you spark.

      I think text game only works if there’s some type of initial attraction and/or rapport created.

      It doesn’t work for me with girls I meet online who don’t immediately agree to meet up.

      Text game just drags on and on and on never leading anywhere.

      Also, girls tend to mirror your text game. If you send caveman texts:

      “gay”

      “meow”

      “Right”

      they tend to repeat this.

      If you explain something and chat, they tend to be more communicative.

      One girl I gamed last year after I banged her revealed, “I was always intrigued by your one word bizarre texts”.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 7:41 am Matthew King

        In other words, use text to get her off of text. There are plenty of clever tricks and approaches, but it’s still their medium. Safe and detached and constantly feeding her attention from 100 sources.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 12:25 pm YaReally

        “The last line is passive, nothing’s ever up to her.”

        Yup. This. Never let her lead the relationship or make the decisions, especially when it comes to sex. It’s “come up and we’ll watch a movie”, not “do you want to come up and watch a movie?” It’s subtle but it’s important and flows thru your whole frame/interactions.

        Don’t stress it tho, it won’t cost you the lay, it’s just something to keep in mind. Always be pushing forward.

        “Girls get a feeling they don’t analyze each and every word the way we do here.”

        This. This flows into the concept of “change her mood not her mind”.

        “That exchange means nothing. I send nonsense, she acknowledges it. But on an attraction level it means she’s thinking of me.”

        Legit shit right here. Good stuff. This extrapolates to real life interactions too. A lot of my interactions are just nonsense small-talk on the surface but there’s a ton I sub-communication going on under the surface that her and I are both aware of but often people listening can’t read.

        “I think text game only works if there’s some type of initial attraction and/or rapport created.”

        Nah. It’s just tricky because its extremely easy for the girl to ignore you, flake, wait to reply till her buying temp settles, etc. but it’s totally do-able…just not with the one-word Jumbotron alpha style txting.

        The main prob is a lot of guys aren’t past the hook point when they try this one-word response stuff. But the girl isn’t attracted/invested enough to be intrigued, she just doesn’t give a shit and assumes you’re boring and nails.

        So I’d rephrase your bit to “I think minimal alpha Jumbotron txt game only works if there’s some type of initial attraction and/or rapport created.”

        “Text game just drags on and on and on never leading anywhere.”

        This is your fault because you need to be leading/pushing. Example of how I txt off the top of my head:

        “You should come to BarX so I can take advantage of you.”
        “Lol I have a BF I told you”
        “That’s alright he can keep you entertained when I’m not around.”
        “You’re terrible”
        “Terribly amazing. In bed. BarX.”
        “Lol no way I don’t trust you”
        “Then you’re smart. I don’t know how I’m going to trick a smart girl into bed. I’ll have to roofie you.”
        “Omg u did not just say that”
        “It won’t be the most offensive thing I say tonight, you’ll have slapped me before we’re on our 2nd drink.”
        “I never said I was coming to drink!!”
        “No, you’re coming to gaze into my eyes on the dance floor while I grope your bum, but I figured you’d need a drink or two before your standards were low enough. But we can skip the drinks and go right to the groping if you insist. Horny girl.”

        Basically every txt is pushing towards meeting up or implying that we WILL be having sex some day, even if she resists I’ll just deflect it or weave around it and try to change her mood and make her laugh or catch her off-guard or pass a shit-test and keep pushing forward.

        Even if she doesn’t come out that night, she knows my intentions and she knows I’m going to push toward a goal. So if she continues to txt after that, she’s demonstrating that she’s attracted enough to WANT me to keep pushing and eventually win her over.

        Most guys txts just go sideways instead of forwards because they let the girl direct the conversation. A lot of these “gay” “8=====D” txts are just going sideways in the interaction. That’s why guys get stuck txting and going nowhere like you describe.

        Russell Brand does this well, and Hank Moody on Californication hitting on Karen while she snubs him is a great example to learn from too. It’s that forward intent overpowering her weak/half-hearted defenses (because she WANTS you to win her over).

        Now there are girls who will just txt forever and never meet up, I find these are usually the hipster/emo/indie/nerd girls who think they’re brilliant witty sarcastic wordsmiths and think they’re impressing and “owning” guys, high on their own superiority delusions that the betas in their life reinforce.

        The nice part about pushing forward with intent is that it weeds these girls out quickly because you push a few times and they deflect without backing down at all and then you know “okay this is a waste of my time” and you can cut your losses or try more chaotic game like starting drama just to see if you can turn it around.

        “If you explain something and chat, they tend to be more communicative.”

        Yep. This is why I don’t cry about how bad girls txt. They’ll txt me 2 or 3 txts max like “wut u up 2?” But I txt the way I write, with full spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc and I don’t waver on that or try “2 talk liek them”. So they shape up and start following my lead and type properly and we have longass comfort/rapport building conversations with multille page-long of txts.

        Am I just happening to run into the only smart girls in the world? Or does it come down to setting the frame? The latter, of course, the same way a girl will be a whore with me but a Madonna around a Nice Guy. They fall into the frame we set for them…which brings us back full circle to the top of this comment: “Never let her lead the relationship”


      • on June 1, 2013 at 2:24 pm Lumpy

        I have some ideas for the archive. I’m trying to make it easier to find awesome posts addressing specific topics. Lemme know if you have any feedback! lumpypuaatgmail.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 8:02 pm Lumpy

        Also, would you be cool with heartiste putting it in the sidebar? Haven’t sent anything about it to him yet, but you def pull your weight vs other bloggers in the “game” section.


      • on June 3, 2013 at 8:57 pm PimpinBlueStar

        This is great shiz


    • on June 1, 2013 at 9:08 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozozo

      hey der da gbfm can helpz!!!

      (Her) 10:04.pm: Come hang out with me and ****

      (Me) 11:29.pm: llotsa cockasz 4u

      (Her) 11:30.pm: What are you doing

      (Me) 12:19am: llotsa cockasz 4u

      (Me) 12:28am: I wanted to know if you were down to hang out with me and ***** but never mind

      (Me) 12:43am: Illotsa cockasz 4u

      (Her) 12:48 am: “Its okay”

      (Me) 12:51am: 8======D ~ ~ ~ llotsa cockasz 4u

      (Her) 12:54 am: Woahh I didn’t expect that

      (Me) 12:59 am: llotsa cockasz 4u

      (Her) 1:02 am: We should hang out sometime. Just us.

      (Me) 1:18am: llotsa cockasz 4u

      (Her) 1:21 am: yes

      (Me) 1:42am: llotsa cockasz 4u

      (Her) 1:47am: You want me to convince you to hang out with me?

      (Me) 2:15am: llotsa cockasz 4u

      IF you try this methodz generally you only need to ddo do the 11:29 post and den SHE WILL BE RIGHT OVERZ!

      at th every most you will have to go to the 12:19 POStz lzollzoz

      lzozoozozozzz


  29. on May 31, 2013 at 2:10 pm redpillmtl

    “It’s complicated” is still the best IMO


    • on June 1, 2013 at 1:14 am Subway Masturbator

      I’m starting to see it used in almost every cheesy TV script now. It’s already burnt. As soon as someone uses it in real life on me I see them as a deceptive, insincere flake.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 11:25 am itsme

        if you feel it’s played out, use ‘long story’ instead. same concept, different wording.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 1:57 pm Anonymous

        U have time for Tv? Lol get a hobby


  30. on May 31, 2013 at 2:10 pm Ronin

    Response 11: “Deez nutz in yo mouf?”


  31. on May 31, 2013 at 2:16 pm babybluejeans

    Bit of a departure from text game (fwiw I use “ghey” all the time and it really is gold). How do you recover/calibrate your game if you banged the *slightly* less attractive roommate of a girl you’re interested in? Happened drunk after a late-night dance party at their apartment. My thought is pretty much ignore it happened and definitely don’t seem apologetic…just keep the same frame as before. But if someone has any particular experience or suggestions in this department, knowledge sharing would be appreciated.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 3:11 pm late late late bloomer

      i think it’s a good topic for people with more knowledge than me, but i had something similar. i had sex with the sister of a girl i really want, while she was in the house. both of them are married and about equally hot but in different ways.

      at the time i had given up on the one i wanted and just figured ‘close enough’. but since then, there’s a little bit of jealousy and just the buzz of doing the job right on her sister, it gets around. they talk more than we do.

      so i think you might even be safe joking about it occasionally. the roommate may know the other one’s not as hot as she is, but she still is jealous of _something_ about her, and if she’s interested at all it’s been eating at her. smile, joke, laugh (i occasionally have a laugh about the sister being a squirter for example), and plow forward. you’re a man with the world by the tail, not the least bit unnerved or surprised to be sleeping with roommates.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 4:25 pm Tyrone

        Women always know whose hottest in the room. They establish their pecking orders based on that criteria.


      • on May 31, 2013 at 7:56 pm realmatt

        INCESTUOUS THREESOME

        DO IT. DO IT.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 11:10 am Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

        And keep your camera phone on.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 5:05 pm YaReally

      Never apologize for your desires as a man.

      If the hot one gives you shit and you’re isolated with her, just respond by staring her down with laser eyes and calmly confidently knowingly saying “You’re jealous. ;)” and then grab her and escalate HARD on her, making out with her before she can respond. She wouldn’t give you shit if she wasn’t attracted and a little miffed that you’d fuck her ugly roommate over her.

      Granted it could work out different, like she might have lost interest because she now thinks you’re a man with low standards. Same time that could be reversed if you were good in bed and her roomie mentions that when they talk about you (which they will). There’s a shit-load of factors to take into account here that aren’t in your vague field report, so you’ll have to play some of it by ear and calibrate as you go cause I can’t predict too accurately without a lot more info and the situation doesn’t sound critical enough for it to be worth you writing up a bunch of details and backstory lol just trust that she’s attracted to you and that any shit she gets from you is her shit-testing you because she’s attracted/jealous. It’ll flow from there.


  32. on May 31, 2013 at 2:32 pm gswann

    Robert A. Heinlein wrote it best:

    EF or FF?

    (The joke explained, if you need a booster seat: “Your daddy wants to know if I want to eat first.”)


  33. on May 31, 2013 at 2:45 pm Anonymous

    Chatting with a very pretty single friend today, guys have NO game at all. They will literally text and text her so desperately, even as she doesn’t respond, and come across as so desperate and needy. When she doesn’t respond she has literally had guys text stuff like “So I’m assuming you’re not interested?”


    • on May 31, 2013 at 4:36 pm late late late bloomer

      every once in a while i think everyone’s going to understand ‘game’ and it’ll make things harder out there. but then i remember even guys i’ve introduced to it do things like this, and if you’re not committed to changing you’ll just keep doing what comes naturally. makes it easier to stand out, that’s for sure.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 5:32 pm YaReally

      Yep. Lots of girls show me the txts/emails they get from other guys because I ask what my competition is like and we just laugh at the other guys together.

      You don’t have to spend 10 years studying game to be more interesting than 90% of the other guys out there lol


      • on June 1, 2013 at 8:04 am Anonymous

        Well I’ve been married since I was young so I’ve never experienced the adult dating scene and live vicariously through my friend in regards to this lol. Oh boy the laughs that have been had.

        She’s had guys she literally just met text:

        “I want to be your new boyfriend :)”

        Most men offer commitment right up front and it is very unattractive imo, any guys reading my comment please understand that women do NOT like upfront offers of commitment!!!

        We also don’t like fawning compliments of “omg you’re so beautiful” and such. I remember to this day one of the first things my now-husband said to me was “you’re kind of cute.”

        Not only just “cute” (rather than beautiful), but only “kind of.” lol. :D

        I think that’s a great line to tell a girl :D I hate it when men act like ass-kissers!


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:56 pm the latent sadist

        for real. ive always instinctively done this. Its so obvious when a guy is running weak game, such an easy way to capitalize on it and build conspiracy. Like i was at a coffee shop and this really jittery fake-social guy was chatting the cute barista. It was obvious she was uncomfortable, just being polite. He would leave then come back and say more weird shit… it was just painful to watch. ALl you gotta do is make eye contact with the trapped girl, smirk and kinda roll your eyes shaking your head. Its like a signal to them… “he gets it”..he knows women. shows your intuition. So much can be conveyed without words.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 3:50 pm YaReally

        PUA term for this is “speaking girl-code”. I use this move a LOT. It’s one of the easiest ways to open. You get extra points for just not being as lame as the other guy lol


    • on June 1, 2013 at 8:42 am Divorced dad

      U must not have game either it you would not be fruendockbed with your very pretty single friend.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 10:24 am Anonymous

        I’m a girl! lol :D no romantic interest in her, divorced dad, I’m not a lesbian!


    • on June 1, 2013 at 2:55 pm Anonymous

      Yep. And the girl’s loss. If she were nice to just one of these betas perhaps she’d not have worked since 2004 like my ex wife. If women had a brain they would recognize betas as the ones who would relieve them of all their problems


  34. on May 31, 2013 at 2:46 pm Rogue Male

    “menses again?”


  35. on May 31, 2013 at 2:58 pm late late late bloomer

    i always thought ‘just give me the chance to treat you right’ was the one


  36. on May 31, 2013 at 3:37 pm Anonymous

    “Nah” is the best one HANDSDOWN….it has it all!


  37. on May 31, 2013 at 3:54 pm Realmatt

    Trick question. Alphas don’t text.


  38. on May 31, 2013 at 3:59 pm Steve

    “hold on”
    and don’t respond any further


  39. on May 31, 2013 at 3:59 pm alphatoddler

    8===========B ——— /\(0)/\


  40. on May 31, 2013 at 4:09 pm chi-town

    It all comes down to : whose frame is it? Length of reply does not matter much in your frame. How you caught that fish on the wall can take an hour. It matters in her frame where one word, dismissive replies are best. Her frame needs to be taken off the wall and sold for a buck at the next garage sale. To long bullshit overtures on hormonal rocket fuel, the more lengthy the reply, the more irreverent it must be, risk vs reward.. “gay”, “who wrote that?”, “I woke up in tears it was so moving”.


  41. on May 31, 2013 at 4:09 pm Matthew King

    Tweet:

    (NSFW) A cute Swedish chick who supported diversity suffers its consequences http://www.wvwnews.net/content/index.php?/news_story/who_was_ellen_krantz.html

    Yeah. That photo should send nations to WAR. Instead, Sweden, land of Vikings, finds a way to blame itself.

    Every man of the west should put that photo in a place of prominence to remember what’s at stake.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 4:18 pm Greg Eliot

      Shame… in the truest sense of the word.

      And shame on us.

      Oh, but that Anders fella was the “nutjob”, saith the Cathedral and its lickspittle lackeys, of whom this place is truly beginning to stink.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 4:20 pm Greg Eliot

      I’ve already got a craw full… but it’s going to take awhile before this image unsticks therefrom.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:23 am Subway Masturbator

        Wait, Dregs, this one’s too dumb even for you. Cave man murders lovely liberal Swedish girl, so as a result you advocate– a narcissistic asshole murdering 75 lovely Swedish teenagers?


      • on June 1, 2013 at 6:29 am Greg Eliot

        Check your premises, punk.

        His was one of the first effective shots made in the war that has not yet been declared.

        Those weren’t all 75 “lovely Swedish” yutes… those were the spawn of the garbage that betrayed and continue to betray Sweden (indeed, the entire West)… in a training camp for their roles as future commissars and treasonous fifth column apparatchiks.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 12:06 pm Jason

        In the future, whenever you want to comment, Greg Eliot, save yourself some effort and just copy and paste the following:

        “blahblahblah comingracewar blahblahblahblah white betrayal blahblahblahblah fifth column blahblahblahblah cogdisagents blahblahblah Jewniggerkikesemite blahblahblahblah readbetweenthelineshowmuchijackofftohitler blahblahblahblah”

        You’re welcome.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 1:43 am Subway Masturbator

        And Mr Eliot should also include a disclaimer that he’s an advocate of murdering people based on their political beliefs.

        Great value system on which to base civilization– all we have to do is murder our enemies, and everything will work OK!!.

        You know Greg, you think a lot like Stalin! Just kill kill kill your enemies– no, not just your enemies, anyone who even DISAGREES with you! You should start a charm school.

        You’re a real genius.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 5:54 pm Greg Eliot

        I see you’re beyond self-embarrassment to the point of farcical parody… but geez, guy… have some pride… or at least give Godwin a day off, on occasion.

        You and your buddy Metro-Onan should have spent more time studying the history of warfare and less time wringing out the dishrags that caught all those alligator tears.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 5:55 pm Greg Eliot

        Mofo, what part of

        And for the record, what dictionary did you NOT read, to think that “advocate” means merely making a remark on the gall and irony of the Cathedral’s usual suspect shaming language?

        You fairy.

        did you NOT understand?


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:36 pm corvinus

        *Norway, but yeah, same thing almost.

        And the big winners in the local elections afterwards was the Conservative Party (center-right), not the Labour Party, as one might expect. The Progress Party would have done significantly better if Siv Jensen hadn’t acted like a betabitch after the massacre.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 5:49 pm Greg Eliot

        DUH… right you are, Norway. Can’t believe I didn’t catch that.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 9:58 am Greg Eliot

        And for the record, what dictionary did you NOT read, to think that “advocate” means merely making a remark on the gall and irony of the Cathedral’s usual suspect shaming language?

        You fairy.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 8:03 pm realmatt

      The stupid behavior on her part, which should be expected – and really only amounts to a small amount of ironic humor – is overshadowed by the fact that the men of Sweden, in failing themselves, have failed their women completely and their children by extension. A very sad state of affairs. Hopefully, enough men will rise up and take back their nation. The Nordic countries are small and homogeneous enough that they could turn it around.

      The US however, is doomed. Irish, Italians, English, etc. all white and all hate each other after they’re done hating the brown people invading.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 10:45 pm Roge

      When I read that earlier today, I felt disgusting dread for a few hours. Had to force my attention onto something else to forget this darkness plaguing the Swedes.


    • on June 1, 2013 at 3:57 pm Inane Rambler

      I don’t consider myself a white nationalist, but this is fucking ridiculous, especially seeing the authorities care so little about it.


  42. on May 31, 2013 at 4:15 pm chi-town

    Leading towards entitlement: OOOXXXLS. Hugs and kisses leading to sex.


  43. on May 31, 2013 at 4:19 pm tompaine37

    I find “push ups” to be a great all-purpose response to annoying inquiries to what I’m doing or thinking about


  44. on May 31, 2013 at 4:56 pm YaReally

    “lol”

    It’s alpha because it’s so gay that I clearly don’t give enough of a shit about her opinion of me to care if she thinks it’s gay.

    That’s why I don’t react when guys/girls on here make fun of me writing lol…they just aren’t important enough for me to care what they think.


    • on May 31, 2013 at 8:42 pm Anonymous

      You said “me writing.” Omg, what a retard!

      Lol jk


  45. on May 31, 2013 at 5:29 pm Mitch Cumstein

    I think Lol is better than gay. It has zero traces of butt-hurt, and I also think “gay” is more common. I’ve seen girls use that or “lame”.

    I love “tl;dr” and voted for it, because I’d love to see the suspense build when she asks what it means. I’ve used “k” and it makes the womenz hamsters explode.


  46. on May 31, 2013 at 5:40 pm Greg Eliot

    What exactly is this “texting” of which you speak?

    Is that where the wimmims are flapping their thumbs instead of their yaps?


    • on June 1, 2013 at 7:59 am Matthew King

      It’s a new form of social communication designed to cater to women’s strengths. Flaky, non-committal, superficial, instant attention gratification, like mice and cocaine pellets. Social skills are neutralized on their way to being destroyed.

      A girl can’t hold a real conversation, doesn’t have to, not when she can conduct a one-dimensional pretend exchange with the blue glowing screen — with all the same psychic rewards as real talking. “Flapping their thumbs” indeed.

      The good news is, that means their defenses have turned to shit in the presence of face-to-face socializing. Take away their crutch and watch how bewildered they become. Like removing her glasses or her life-preserver. She has to grope for guidance, she has to lean on you for stability. Snatch the phone, mold the putty.

      Girls have never been easier. Feminism + technology has stripped them naked.

      Matt


      • on June 1, 2013 at 9:55 am Patriarch

        I thought I was the only one who noticed how defenseless most of these text queens are once you have them in front of you, eye to eye. Putty, indeed.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 10:09 am Greg Eliot

        Good points.

        I’m guessing they laughed pretty hard in that first telecom meeting when someone suggested text messaging on cell phones.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 11:53 am YaReally

        Just because they don’t want to talk to you in real life doesn’t mean they’re incapable of it. Lol


      • on June 1, 2013 at 11:59 am Jason

        Matt King writes: “flaky, non-committal, superficial, instant attention gratification, like mice and cocaine pellets. Social skills are neutralized on their way to being destroyed.”

        I’d argue that people who are flaky, non-committal, superficial, and demand what ever “instant attention gratification” is … actually HELP socialization.

        Forty-five minutes of deep fisking of Rilke’s poetry doesn’t earn friends. Being a social butterfly does.

        But Matt would need to step away from the computer, and his leatherbound copy of Spengler, to learn that.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 7:35 am Matthew King

        What? You are lost in your own head.

        This is why I prefer the company of Greg Eliot and the exceeding few other men on this forum who have been places and done things.

        If I make a criticism and you disagree, it is is not a commentary on you; you don’t have to be so defensive and make everything personal, princess.

        Women “contribute” to rational discourse by filtering the subject through how they feel about the speaker. You don’t like me, so you every utterance of mine must somehow reflect how odious I am. Everything depends on who I am (Aristotle’s ethos in The Rhetoric) determined by how you feel (pathos) rather than what I say (logos).

        I mean, really. You think I don’t adjust my conversation to the particular audience? If a man is capable of high level discourse, that’s not an indication he is incapable of low.

        You’d “argue that people who are flaky, [etc.] … actually HELP socialization,” and yet you don’t present an argument or even an example. You apparently missed my point, which was about crutches: any sort of dependency can become a hindrance to normal behavior when one suddenly finds himself without that dependency. This is something you want to “argue”?

        Try to transcend your petty resentments and speak like a man.

        Matt


      • on June 2, 2013 at 2:36 pm Jason

        “Try to … speak like a man.”

        The comedy writes itself. Matt, unless you’re aiming for self-caricature, try NOT scolding strangers for failing to act manly enough. Just once. That’s really the crux of my complaint about your comments.

        Conspicuously absent is any concrete mention, ever, of your own experience with women. You ARE on a website dedicated to that.

        I’m just sayin’. The fact has not escaped unnoticed.

        And yes, flaky people who flit from one social circle to another actually DO help masses form into groups, and those groups to learn from one another. It may offend your bookish Ph.D. sensibilities (you’re not fooling anybody here), but it’s true.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 3:04 pm Greg Eliot

        Conspicuously absent is any concrete mention, ever, of your own experience with women. You ARE on a website dedicated to that.

        I’m just sayin’. The fact has not escaped unnoticed.

        Aw, geez… Cathedral “can’t get laid” shaming language again?

        (((shakes head)))


      • on June 2, 2013 at 3:29 pm Stilicho

        @ Matt King:

        “Women “contribute” to rational discourse by filtering the subject through how they feel about the speaker. You don’t like me, so you every utterance of mine must somehow reflect how odious I am.”

        And over-zealous Jesuits like you “contribute” to rational discussion by filtering the subject through the prism of Scripture — and, in your case, by a second filter consisting of irrelevant classical texts which contribute nothing to the conversation — but which at least allow you the opportunity to appear superior to your audience.

        You are a prig, and an effeminate one at that.

        “If I make a criticism and you disagree, it is is not a commentary on you; you don’t have to be so defensive and make everything personal, princess.”

        As a matter of fact it’s the rule, not the exception, for you to direct your words at a commenter — as in, the commenter personally — rather than at his or her ideas. Insult, snark, sarcasm (“You are a Frankenstein experiment…” “…divorced parents?”…..”you are a dunderhead….” etc., etc., etc…) are your stock in trade, Matt. Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. And an ad hominem attack is the last — and, usually, the first — weapon of someone who cannot meet an argument on its own terms.

        Try a rapier for once, instead of a bludgeon. It takes a bit more training to use. But you may find it more satisfying.

        And stop being so thin-skinned. A few commenters shoot back at you, treating you as you treat others, and the first thing you do is drop your rifle, run for cover, and whine about how weak and unmanly the enemy is for….

        …for actually daring to return your fire.

        How dare they!

        You are like a boxer who has delighted in pounding on a passive opponent…and who runs crying from the ring when he suddenly gets a glove to the face.

        And for fuck’s sake, don’t call out to Greg Eliot for help. Twice now you’ve praised him in what is clearly intended to be a subtle plea for help. “Hey Greg! Feel free to help me out!” That’s the subtext, and we all see it. Don’t be so pusillanimous. Fight your own damn battles.

        Besides…calling on Greg Eliot for intellectual support is like calling on the Italian Army for help.

        Even a dunderhead like you ought to know that much.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 3:37 pm Matthew King

        Weren’t you just pissing your pants about ad hominem a few posts back, Jason? And yet all you seem capable of doing is attempting to void criticism by impeaching the critic.

        Again, see what you did? Out of all the statements I made, you focused on the least important one (“speak like a man”), but it was the one statement that you could most plausibly construe as personally directed. This is indeed how women think.

        Men deliberate about abstractions and subjects. Women gab about people. And only through those people can they understand a subject. Therefore, you and your BFF’s believe it imperative to know all the details about a person before they can examine his thinking. It’s all that’s on your feminine mind, the “who” rather than the “what.”

        I’ll tell you all about my personal life if you can stitch together something resembling an argument. Deal? Not an assertion, not an observation about your critics, but a reasoned presentation of a supportable opinion.

        “I’d argue that…” you said. Well, show us “that” you can “argue.” Then I’ll tell you all the fascinating detail about myself, like, what’s my favorite color, when I had my first kiss, what apps I have on my phone, how many drinks it would take before I’d fuck your wife, etc. All of that stuff so vital to your method of processing.

        (Breathe… breathe … concentrate on the deal I presented, concentrate on the deal, don’t let that last personal zinger throw you off again. Can you manage that? Bring some manliness back to the left, stud!)

        Matt


      • on June 2, 2013 at 3:43 pm Greg Eliot

        And for fuck’s sake, don’t call out to Greg Eliot for help. Twice now you’ve praised him in what is clearly intended to be a subtle plea for help. “Hey Greg! Feel free to help me out!” That’s the subtext, and we all see it. Don’t be so pusillanimous. Fight your own damn battles.

        Who the fuck do you think you’re kidding? Reading “subtle pleas” where none exist? And is that the royal “we”, or your oft-outed army of sock puppets… which at least even the Italian army could handle.

        You…

        (can’t say it anymore, or my comments get swallowed… sigh)


      • on June 2, 2013 at 3:49 pm Matthew King

        Now you’ve done it, Bel Riose/Stilicho/Tertullian/etc. You’re boring me. At least Jason’s resentments are somewhat more challenging to uncover, as he doesn’t wear them on his sleeve like you do.

        I filter everything through scripture, do I? I would ask you to demonstrate this risible thesis, but the more I converse with you the more I want to kill myself. Save the paranoid atheism for your therapist. I SEE ORAL ROBERTS UNDER EVERY ROCK, BEHIND EVERY WORD!!!!

        Out of my sight, fairy.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 4:01 pm anonymous

        “That’s the subtext, and we all see it. Don’t be so pusillanimous. Fight your own damn battles.”

        Wohhh, look at junior go! Stilicho may be a sockpuppeting omega clown, but it’s nice to see that he’s at least been expanding his vocabulary during these exchanges.

        His little brain, it’s like a sponge I tell you! *tear*


      • on June 2, 2013 at 4:04 pm Stilicho

        @ Matt King

        “….the more I converse with you, the more I want to kill myself.”

        Then let’s keep talking!


      • on June 2, 2013 at 4:24 pm Greg Eliot

        Then let’s keep talking!

        See? Now that’s how you cast a barb.

        Good to see osmosis in action… steel does indeed sharpen steel. lulz


      • on June 2, 2013 at 11:27 pm Pax Romana

        “This is why I prefer the company of Greg Eliot and the exceeding few other men on this forum who have been places and done things.”

        What???? Where has Greg Eliot been other than his back yard and his KKK meetings on the other side of town closer to the river? You presume too much about his trailer trash worldliness. Too much daydreaming over Greg Eliot’s sophistication is like too much daydreaming over the pussy you haven’t had in a couple of decades.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 11:57 pm Greg Eliot

        Geez Louise, if you’re going to keep posting under different names, at least try to vary the style a bit.

        Stupid and sock-puppeting is no way to go through life, boy.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 12:16 pm Greg Eliot

        But Matt would need to step away from the computer, and his leatherbound copy of Spengler, to learn that.

        Yeah, and the day you have anything to say that would be of learning value, especially to your betters, the decline of the West will be declared to have officially occurred.

        You fairy.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:42 pm Greg Eliot

        I thought you didn’t care?

        You fairy.


  47. on May 31, 2013 at 6:25 pm jcclimber

    tl;dr, pretty much any woman’s hamster is going to be sure that you read it and now you’re lying.

    gay still works. Nah is my favorite.
    Like to use yep and nah or nope.
    Jesus said let your yes mean yes and your no mean no, so you’re just following the advice of the ultimate alpha on that one.


  48. on May 31, 2013 at 6:45 pm The Best All-Purpose Alpha Male Text Response « PUA Central

    […] The Best All-Purpose Alpha Male Text Response […]


  49. on May 31, 2013 at 7:37 pm Anonymous

    My Dearest Dark Purveyors,

    Butthext my txt game! Lay the shiv deep and grind down the burrs of my emerging marble form as I have betafuxxored myself in a previous herb life. I only recently emerged from the fire (crotch?) lake of sulfur that was sure to be my existence. I await your disemboweling analytical embrace.

    Yours in all things rational,
    The Dacha

    PS – I offered up a sacrifice in your name 2 inches north and 3 inches to the left of a quaint lil tramp stamp. Workin on my aim beathces…pay it forward.

    ———-
    her: {random hamstering}
    me: what color panties u wearin
    ——————-
    her: {flaking then half-unflaking}
    me: i’ll meet up if you buy my drinks
    ——————-
    her: im gonna bring a friend, but she has a boyfriend
    me: if we meet up she’ll cheat on her bf
    ——–
    her: is this a group date?
    me: are your friends hot?
    ———————–
    her: meet me at XXX
    me: that’s not on my list tonight {she knows i’m going to the bar next door}
    ———————
    me: no {sent when she asks multiple questions that don’t relate. usually gets an instaply i.e. instant reply}
    ——————
    me: i dont care
    ————–
    me: whatevs
    ————
    her: i can’t make it tonight {sent 30 min before date}
    me: yo grl, lets meetup an hour earlier tonight {sent 17 minutes before the original date. trying to imply a second date was setup…dread?}
    ————


  50. on May 31, 2013 at 8:37 pm walawala

    “Gay” I’ve used a lot.

    My own contenders which I think I created or adapted are:

    “spank your ass”

    “oh …”

    “ya..i’m the guy your mom warned you about” in response to angry outburst. Waited 1 week, girl showed up to party she knew I would be at and followed me around. We chatted and I gamed her with push-pull, negs, kino, spanking her ass unexpectedly which brought about more following and a huge surge of blood to her face. She left. I followed up a few hours later very late at night with:

    Me: “meow”

    Her: yes


  51. on May 31, 2013 at 8:48 pm Stig

    “Bring the movies” is in the Hall of Fame, though.


  52. on May 31, 2013 at 9:36 pm Aaron

    I’m finding lots of versatility and potency in the “heh”/”meh” combo.


  53. on May 31, 2013 at 10:14 pm Credit to CH: The Best All-Purpose Alpha Male Text Response | Study in courtship

    […] Source: https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/the-best-all-purpose-alpha-male-text-response/ […]


  54. on June 1, 2013 at 1:19 am driveallnight

    Fuck this, I’m not voting. Everyone knows the best all-purpose alpha text is….

    RAPE!


    • on June 1, 2013 at 9:58 am Patriarch

      If you say that three times, you’ll smell whiskey right before you see him in the bathroom mirror.
      Bet on it.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 2:46 pm whorefinder

        The legend lives on…

        Don’t forget that I also hold up Candyman’s severed head for you to see..

        ‘Cause fuck niggers, that’s why.


    • on June 1, 2013 at 1:44 pm whorefinder

      well done, young paduan.


  55. on June 1, 2013 at 5:45 am walawala

    Another one for your evaluation and amusement.

    I just did this with a girl…

    Her; am going to xyz club

    Me: cool, cocktails after, you’re buying the first round

    Her: depends on mood (MAJOR SHIT TEST)

    Me: 20 minutes later… “Yah, mine”

    Gay or silence wouldn’t work this requires amping up the asshole.


    • on June 2, 2013 at 12:42 am driveallnight

      Her: depends on mood

      Me: you moooed? cow


      • on June 2, 2013 at 5:58 pm walawala

        Good one…but, when girls are pissed off, or being bitches, I think a dominant reframe may be better.

        In my case, I did meet up. She was all bitchy. But my text did instill some dread and I ended up banging her and re-establishing my own leadership in this interaction.


  56. on June 1, 2013 at 6:24 am Scray

    Lol. This 5.5 is in love with me (just followed the 3 second rule and opened the closest set) and she sends me these long texts….like I asked her if she likes her job and she wrote me a novel. At the end she’s like

    Her: Ok so tell me about yourself and what you like?
    Me: good shit mostly
    Her: lol no I want you to type til your fingers hurt! I’ll massage your hands afterward
    Me: 8==========================================================================================================================================================================D
    Her: omg wtf lol! You’re sneaky, I answered your question!
    Me: (hours later) I typed a dick. Monday 800.
    Her: lol I can’t wait

    On the one hand, who gives a shit she’s OK. On the other hand, when I first started, the 5-6’s I’d approach were generally very cold. Now 5-6’s usually are pretty warm when I take a break from shooting myself in the foot with actual hot 7+ girl sets.


  57. on June 1, 2013 at 6:24 am Sherlock

    Hamster of the year:

    http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/2013/05/27/meaningful-glances-from-clarissa-noh/


    • on June 1, 2013 at 7:03 am Adam

      Asking for courtship advice from a woman. SMH. He deserved nothing but hamsters.


    • on June 1, 2013 at 3:22 pm Inane Rambler

      Yet the guys who run that website wonder why they are low on the SMP totem pole.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 3:39 pm Inane Rambler

        Especially the guy who then goes on to completely play into the feminist that attacked him’s frame.

        (BTW, this very same feminist is, for reasons I will never understand, on Captain Capitalism’s blogroll.)


  58. on June 1, 2013 at 6:56 am Adam

    LOLOLOOLOLOL sounds like a comedy

    http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/die_wand_2012/

    Based on Marlen Haushofer’s eponymous feminist classic novel, THE WALL is a highly original exploration of the experience of solitude and survival set in a spectacularly beautiful Austrian mountain landscape.

    A woman awakens one day to discover her mountain cabin has been separated from the rest of the world by an invisible wall. She can see through it, but she’s unable to pass. As the days turn to weeks and the seasons begin to change her solitude becomes more and more of a threat to her survival. What caused it? Why is it happening? When will it end?

    WHEN WILL IT END????? lllolololololozzzzz


  59. on June 1, 2013 at 7:10 am Adam

    I wore a shirt with a Skittles logo on it to this college bar last night for shits and giggles. You have no idea the amount of girls that opened me with “I love Skittles!”


  60. on June 1, 2013 at 7:57 am Young Journeyman

    She was a hooker; this was after he had sex with her and payed her.


    • on June 1, 2013 at 8:03 am Matthew King

      The perfunctory wave at the end is what it’s all about.


  61. on June 1, 2013 at 9:21 am Seraph

    “The thinking and behavior of the typical burnt beta reader makes me just want to say, “No class,” and continue out of earshot from their ghetto-bourgeois piss-and-moan dirges.”

    And yet…you still linger here…


    • on June 1, 2013 at 9:53 am Anonymous

      As do we all… your point?


      • on June 1, 2013 at 10:22 am Seraph

        Wasn’t talking to you, water boy…


      • on June 1, 2013 at 10:38 am Greg Eliot

        I got your boy hanging right here, poindexter.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 12:28 pm Seraph

        Yeah, about the level of response I would expect from you, lap dog…


      • on June 1, 2013 at 12:32 pm Bel Riose

        @ Seraph — agreed. Greg Eliot is Matt King’s lapdog all right. And the beautiful thing is, Matt doesn’t even acknowledge his existence. How Greg must yearn for even a small crumb of recognition from Matt! Maybe someday….


      • on June 1, 2013 at 12:51 pm Jason

        Greg Eliot is actually pretty famous. I found his profile online:

        http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Salacious_B._Crumb


      • on June 1, 2013 at 12:57 pm Bel Riose

        @ Jason — now THAT was fucking hilarious…..I tip my hat to you sir; well done; very well done indeed.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:45 pm Greg Eliot

        You boys better be careful y’all don’t hurt your shoulders… circle-jerkin’ like that.

        Your fairies.

        I repeat an earlier post for you South Park dweebs:

        You talk big about “bros” and “men”, but when a man rightfully calls you on your bullshit, or stands up for a bro who he respects, you get all pissy like some dimwit cunt… and then make like respect = toadying.

        Your fathers, such as they were, should have taken you to a ballgame or something… or given you a good feel of his backhand.

        It would give me great pleasure to backhand the lot of you.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 1:53 pm Greg Eliot

        Greg Eliot is Matt King’s lapdog all right. And the beautiful thing is, Matt doesn’t even acknowledge his existence.

        If you’re gonna attempt to snark and gloat, shithead, at least try to keep the story straight. Matt and I often tip the cap to one another here at the chateau.

        You fairy.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 2:29 am Mark

        You’re a joke, Greg. Let’s face it. That’s why Matt keeps you around. You’re always a good place holder when there aren’t any girls around that he can offer his penile services.

        Notice, Greg’s new word that he copied form another poster and he overuses is you fairy. Imagine a fag calling everyone else a fairy……lol.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 9:51 am Greg Eliot

        Another South Park Shlomo who has no reading comprehension… just what the chateau needed. :rolleyes

        Notice, Greg’s new word that he copied form another poster and he overuses is you fairy.

        I believe I was the first to do that Al Pacino schtick here at the chateau… as per my earlier post:

        (if you’d pay attention instead of running your yap, you’d know that’s my homage to the running joke at the chateau about Glengarry Glen Ross).

        You fairy.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 5:41 pm Patriarch

        Jason reads the Star Wars wiki…
        Bahahahahahaha
        What a fruitcake.
        Let me know if you want me to tell you how to disable the net nanny software so you can view less childish sites when your mom, er wife isn’t home.


    • on June 2, 2013 at 7:54 am Matthew King

      One guy named after an obscure sci-fi character laughing at the other guy’s Star Wars reference.

      For the record, Greg Eliot is easily one of the best regulars on this site. He gets it. He has the experience, education, style, and command of the written word you wish you had.

      You mindless haters shoot spitballs at the things you don’t understand because your ignorance makes you insecure. When men converse, you get the vague sense that you are being insulted (which you are, but only indirectly) and react with all the spastic energy of a teenage sped.

      Which brings me to this “Bel Riose” twerp, who also goes by the name “Stilicho” and “Tertullan” and “Anonymous” and who knows what else. He has been clutching to my ankles literally for years now, wherever I post. He switches up accounts in a stalker-like attempt to give the impression that he is legion. Something about my presence irks him, so he has dedicated his life to attaching his repetitive criticism to everything I post. It’s an unintentional compliment, if tiresome.

      Why do I “still linger here”? Because men like Eliot and CH and maybe ten others linger here. And “for the sake of ten I will not destroy it.”

      Matt


      • on June 2, 2013 at 8:46 am Stilicho

        Greg Eliot has the “experience, education, style, and command of the written word you wish you had….” ?

        Do you judge literary talent by comic-book standards?

        I mean, it’s nice of you to finally throw the guy a bone and all, but seriously…..


      • on June 2, 2013 at 9:54 am Greg Eliot

        Heh… sussed out for sock-puppeting and still has the gall to shamelessly snark.

        Case closed…

        You fairy.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 10:10 am Greg Eliot

        One guy named after an obscure sci-fi character laughing at the other guy’s Star Wars reference.

        Yeah, I smirked at that too… alphie who loves to snipe pulling out the big guns now.

        Watch for him at the next Star Trek convention… he’ll be the one hailing all within earshot to “live long and prosper!”

        LLZOZLZLZLLZOZOZOZLZLZLZLZLZOZOZLZLZLZL


      • on June 2, 2013 at 10:45 am You Fairy

        “For the record, Greg Eliot is easily one of the best regulars on this site. He gets it. He has the experience, education, style, and command of the written word you wish you had.”

        Wow, almost fell off my seat after reading this retort. He’s one of the best, alright. He’s one of the best mindless dummies frequenting this website and posting the same ridiculous comments repeatedly that only take up space and time, you mindless fucker. How could you think Greg is quality? Don’t you have any standards? Are the girls you fuck also low standards?

        “When men converse”

        FOTFL, you mean when trailer trash acting like educated men converse, they sound like us.

        “Something about my presence irks him, so he has dedicated his life to attaching his repetitive criticism to everything I post. “

        The only thing that irks, is your dishonesty and double standard, but unlike you two, no one has dedicated his life to this place like Greg and you.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 11:10 am anonymous

        “The only thing that irks me….”

        Fixed that for you, carnival monkey.

        You’ve already been outed as a sockpuppeting little bitch, it’s about time you start owning up to it.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 11:57 am Greg Eliot

        Truly… it’s embarrassing to see such sock-puppetry where there’s even no attempt to mask the style.

        People used to at least be ashamed when caught at such antics.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 12:21 pm Anonymous

        Someone said all purpose? Greg is the best all-purpose punching bag. His face must look like pizza crust. He’s such a fairy.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 12:25 pm Greg Eliot

        It isn’t usual form for the guy getting his ass kicked… under several different names yet… to declare victory whilst face-down on the canvas.

        You fairy.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 11:25 am Matthew King

        Pick a screenname and stick with it.

        You stupid fucking cunt, you idiot. You fairy.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 12:18 pm You Fairy

        Why the anger? Don’t tell me; when Greg’s ass throbs, yours does too. Two butts inside the same boxers. You fairies.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 12:21 pm Greg Eliot

        Why the anger

        What, are you THAT dim that you don’t recognize the Glengarry Glen Ross schtick by now?

        By the way, you and your other personae are really laying the queer stuff on pretty thick…

        You fairy.


  62. on June 1, 2013 at 11:12 am anotheronetakesthepill

    What about the “u are just too (young … or other filler) to understand


  63. on June 1, 2013 at 11:13 am The Man of Mystery

    Personally, as I mentioned in the “I haven’t been fully honest with you” thread, The best multipurpose response to nearly anything said through text is one word, one letter.

    “k”

    Application 1: Passing a shit test

    HER: You know I ran into my ex bf at the store and he told me that I should be holding you to a higher standard. He used to buy me flowers and take me out all the time, and lately I feel like you haven’t been paying attention to me at all!!!11ONEONE (obviously contrived)

    YOU (8 hours later): k
    then ignore several more hours
    if brought up again reframe or A&A

    Application 2: Building indifference and aloofness

    HER: Hey cutie
    HER: I really liked what we did last night
    HER (15 minutes later): Hello?

    YOU (2 hours later): k
    let her pursue you after that a bit.

    Application 3: IHAB

    HER: I Have a BF…

    YOU: k
    followed by disqualification

    ….etc.

    I have never had the power of “k” fail me.


  64. on June 1, 2013 at 11:28 am FredMertz

    A bit OT but hey how bout that Amanda Bynes?


  65. on June 1, 2013 at 1:45 pm whorefinder

    Dark Lord and Master,

    We all know what the best response to anything a woman (or a left-wing male) is…

    say it with me…

    altogether now…

    you can do it….

    Rape!


  66. on June 1, 2013 at 2:53 pm Seraph

    @ Bel Riose,

    Glad to know others see it, but then again how could they not? The sycophancy is so obvious, it is sickening.

    I just tend to peruse the comments and is glaringly obvious.


    • on June 1, 2013 at 3:00 pm Bel Riose

      @ Seraph,

      Agreed. It IS glaringly obvious. Someone criticizes Matt King — count on a quick response from Greg Eliot, usually culminating in the word “fairy.”

      Check out the link Jason posted above…I guarantee it will make you laugh.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 4:07 pm Greg Eliot

        I only chime in when the criticism is unjust, e.g., calling him “stupid”, which he obviously is not.

        But which you are…

        You fairy.

        (if you’d pay attention instead of running your yap, you’d know that’s my homage to the running joke at the chateau about Glengarry Glen Ross).


      • on June 1, 2013 at 5:44 pm Patriarch

        The problem is, is that it’s rarely a criticism of him. Usually it is name calling and shaming that is characteristic of the feminist mind set that would be offended at the things Matt K.says. I’m curious what you guys even hope to accomplish here.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 5:46 pm Greg Eliot

        True that… for such stalwart opponents of The Cathedral around here, most of them seem firmly ensconces therein.

        Go figure.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 7:14 pm Patriarch

        It grows tiresome sometimes watching them come and go here, allowed by CH to freely spew their venom. He is a most gracious host. You think any of us would be allowed the same freedom of speech on one of the Faithfuls blogs? I can assure I’ve been there, and censorship is the standard battle order, albeit after several volleys of silly name calling and shaming. They come here and are usually given a few rounds of logical argument, and once their arguments are felled by the piercing realism of the truths contained here, they can do nothing but shriek and flail like a wounded pig. They remind me of the ungrateful hordes of invaders crossing over into Western lands, lured here by the promise of freedom, in this case the ability to speak freely, and the only thing they can do is to use their new privilege to literally shit all over the place. Every insulting drive by trolling out to have “Thank you CH for respecting me enough to allow me to post here even though I do not respect anyone who disagrees with me as I am a leftoid, and therefore only believe that I have the right to criticize.”


      • on June 2, 2013 at 10:04 am Greg Eliot

        You think any of us would be allowed the same freedom of speech on one of the Faithfuls blogs? I can assure I’ve been there, and censorship is the standard battle order, albeit after several volleys of silly name calling and shaming.

        Exactamundo… when you don’t lay down and toe the PC line and other sites, indeed, when you give back twice as good as you get, they’re not used to getting stood up to.

        Even sites that are purportedly “right-leaning”… as meaningless as that phrase has become.

        Subsequently, when their shaming language has no effect, and their puny snarks are countered with some true world-class barbs, well… their last defense is Dynamic Silence, and further comments are banned.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 7:19 pm Patriarch

        Yeah I believe most of their claims of red pill ingestion are simply false papers to make it past the first defense rings. No man can serve two masters.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 11:44 pm Anonymous

        STFU already. We don’t need an old man calling himself a Patriarch. How about a dinosaur instead? You and Eliot both.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 11:53 pm Greg Eliot

        Another Anonymous sock puppy who needs to be shown a rolled up newspaper, lest he continue to stink up the chateau.

        Lawdy, you South Park dweebs are tiresome!


      • on June 3, 2013 at 12:21 am Anonymous

        It’s hilarious when you get insulted, Gregi baby. It shows how pathetic you are. And, you thought the CH is your private playground? Go back to bed if you still have one. Or did wify throw you outside with the dog (and the garbage)?


      • on June 3, 2013 at 12:27 am corvinus

        It’s PC fruitcakes like you that are dying out. And you call traditionalists dinosaurs… the irony drips. As usual, projecting your own eff’d-up characteristics on sane people.


      • on June 3, 2013 at 12:33 am Anonymous

        Sane people? who? You, dinosaur, and KKK?


      • on June 3, 2013 at 1:01 am Greg Eliot

        It’s hilarious when you get insulted, Gregi baby

        Funnier yet is your need to attempt insult and come up a cropper in veracity and creativity… I can understand why you do it through numerous sock-puppy monickers… the shame of such paucity of wit would be too great to bear for shoulders so rounded.


    • on June 1, 2013 at 3:12 pm n/a

      @ Seraph & Bel Riose,

      You do seem like a couple of petty progg faggots, so “fairy” is an apt kiss-off.

      I wouldn’t want either of you in my platoon.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 3:44 pm Seraph

        You here that, Bel Riose?

        We are being denied membership in the ass-kissing platoon.

        I weep in shame.

        Now, the question is, do any of these guys really exist, or are they sock puppets? Notice how when one toady fails, another one magically pops up?

        On the internet no one may know you are a dog, but they DO know when you are pathetic.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 4:05 pm corvinus

        We are being denied membership in the ass-kissing platoon.

        Hah. You braindead leftoids are in the ultimate ass-kissing platoon.


      • on June 1, 2013 at 4:09 pm Greg Eliot

        What’s pathetic is you calling yourself a Seraph, whilst only earning the wings of… yeah, that’s right…

        You fairy.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 9:30 am haunted trilobite

        nicely segued


      • on June 2, 2013 at 5:57 pm Patriarch

        I knew a guy once in real life who used Seraph as an internet handle.
        He was a little turd tapper.
        He listened to bands like My Chemical Romance and thoughg of himself as a misunderstood edgy artist.
        Reminds me of other terrible cliche handles like
        Darkdragon
        ThEWAysOfOLdE
        ElvenMaiden
        DarkKnight11
        Black nails and eyeliner, I bet this kid looks like one of those long haired sissyfags you see prancing around on the Disney Channel. Politically Correct thought has made that channel go from classic childrens movies and stories to shows which typically follow some meaningless humorless tripe full of diversity, snarky comments by the strong lead female character to her omeaga lapdogs, and materialism.
        Seraph, in retalliation to this post: “Yeah dude well at least I’m not watching the Disney Channel, you sell out capitalist pig rape apologist…”
        Me: “Easy there, DarkChampion94@yahoo…I was babysitting my cousins kids.”


      • on June 1, 2013 at 4:15 pm Greg Eliot

        Now, the question is, do any of these guys really exist, or are they sock puppets? Notice how when one toady fails, another one magically pops up?

        Fail? It’s customary where I come from to only claim victory once it’s actually been achieved.

        You fairy.

        And as far as the “popping up” goes, that’s exactly what you South Parkers have been doing… and now, as per usual, the usual projection onto others of your own sock-puppetry.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 1:50 am Subway Masturbator

        Hey, I’m a pinko faggot too, better than being a murderous race-troll any day baybee…..


      • on June 2, 2013 at 4:24 pm corvinus

        Better being alpha than an omega buttboy jackoffasaur.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 4:27 pm Greg Eliot

        Heh, heh… more like that first-to-extinction lesbian dinosaur… Licktalottapus.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 6:31 pm Patriarch

        Ah, I get it. Murderous.
        Guilty by thought association.
        Reminds me of how leftoids believe you have actually commited rape if a woman allows you to have sex with her without expressly giving verbal consent.
        Tell me, SubMas, do you really believe he is murderous, or have you realized you other buzzwords carry less weight here?


      • on June 3, 2013 at 1:08 am Greg Eliot

        Only in Cyberia, land of 1001 lives and sock puppies!

        I never have this much tedium in meat world… the flies I swat there stay mushed.


    • on June 2, 2013 at 11:55 am Matthew King

      Fuck, dude. Now you have your alternating accounts talking to each other? “Glad to know others see it”? A different identity and fake e-mail address does not constitute an “other.”

      This bro’s trollery is so large that one, two, eight identities are not enough to express it. Ever wonder what Sybil would be like as an omega? Seraph/Bel Riose/Stilicho/Tertullian/anonymous is your case study. Resentment-induced schizophrenia.

      I just want to know why he/they care[s] so much. Did I accidentally rape your sister? Did I eat your fish called Wanda?

      Matt


      • on June 2, 2013 at 5:37 pm Seraph

        Ahhh, the Troll King finally summons the courage to emerge from his cave!

        Make way all ye yipping lap dogs for your dork lord and master! Perhaps if you roll over and show your bellies he’ll give you a rub!

        For the record, I do not hate you Matt, I truly don’t. I just find you tedious and obnoxious and with this latest farce, pathetic.

        Here’s a hint, free of charge, of where you went wrong.

        You make it a little too obvious when your “pawns” first attack, one after other, and then only after you think it’s safe you deign to show yourself. Seems a trifle, er, how does one say it?

        Oh, yeah…”coordinated”.

        Been on message boards for over a decade, Matt. I see the patterns, I know the tricks. You = busted.

        You are pompous, yet have no right to be as you lack the ability to defend yourself when truly challenged, which I discovered just recently for myself.

        Ordinarily, I would just shrug and let it go.

        But then, when I see you are so desperate to avoid an argument that you use toadies and lackies to run interference for you lest you be exposed…

        Guess I kind of irked me, so I took you to task. Apparently I hit a nerve because you have emerged, blustering:

        “What? Me? Me engaged in trollery and sock puppetry? No! No! It-It is you, YOU that have done so! (cough) Pay no attention to the platoon of random screen names conveniently lining up to protect me…”

        I have one question for you, Matt, and if you can manage to even attempt a straight and coherent answer to it, I will leave you alone. I really will. If you don’t, I will have my fun critiquing your comments, and only your comments, for as long as it amuses me. Lap dogs will not distract me. At all.

        What is your purpose in lingering here when you have such open contempt for the site’s authors and the majority of its commentators? Are you here to contribute something, or just be a contrarian troll?


      • on June 2, 2013 at 6:16 pm Seraph

        Oh, and surprise, surprise!

        Matt manages to make a reply only after his legion of suckteat minions have attempted to run interference for him lest he actually lose face. How…typical. Points for consistency at least, dude.

        “I just want to know why he/they care[s] so much.”

        I wouldn’t normally, but your mixture of pompous no-nothingness combined with cowardice calls out to me to for mockery and exposure. Call it my higher calling.

        And genius, I have posting here on CH for at least as long as you, maybe longer. Go ahead, check it out.

        So, maybe you will actually be brave enough to answer my original question, or should I expect another “platoon” of lackies, lap dogs and sock puppets as your only reply?


      • on June 2, 2013 at 6:29 pm Greg Eliot

        Seraph Matt manages to make a reply only after his legion of suckteat sockpuppies minions have attempted to run interference for him lest he actually lose face. How…typical. Points for consistency at least, dude.

        FIFY.

        Now go away, kid… you’re embarrassing yourself.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 6:41 pm Seraph

        YIP! YIP! YIP!

        …goes the lapdog…


      • on June 3, 2013 at 7:26 am Greg Eliot

        Who told you that you could run with the big dogs?

        You shi-tzu.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 6:40 pm Seraph

        Oh, wait, I see, you DID finally answer. My bad. It was hard to find amid all of the insightful and urbane comments like this:

        “You stupid fucking cunt, you idiot. You fairy.”

        See, was that so hard, sunshine? No need to gather your toadies together to shield you, no need to hide from the light, no need to get all bitchy.

        Just answer a simple question. That’s all I asked of you there precious.

        So, let’s check out this brief answer that yet took so much effort.

        “Why do I “still linger here”? Because men like Eliot and CH and maybe ten others linger here. And “for the sake of ten I will not destroy it.”

        Ooookay.

        So, you are some kind of savior, trying to spare what from whom? Or you are the angry god trying to find a reason not to destroy this blog?


      • on June 2, 2013 at 6:57 pm Patriarch

        It’s funny Seraph. You keep going on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on.
        Go back to your chubby hipster haram.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 7:21 pm Seraph

        YIP! YIP! YIP!


      • on June 2, 2013 at 9:12 pm Patriarch

        At least now you’re starting to learn your long drawn out posts make you look blacktarded.


      • on June 3, 2013 at 1:18 am Greg Eliot

        You give him too much credit… if he’s got a harem, chubby or no, then I’m King Solomon.


      • on June 3, 2013 at 1:17 am Greg Eliot

        Oh, wait, I see, you DID finally answer. My bad. It was hard to find amid all of the insightful and urbane comments like this:

        “You stupid fucking cunt, you idiot. You fairy.”

        Geez, this is about the third time in this thread alone it’s been mentioned that this line is a running joke here at the chateau as an homage to the movie Glengarry Glen Ross.

        I mean, the fucking youtube of Pacino’s routine has been posted at least half a dozen times in the past few weeks.

        Are you really this dim?

        The douche chills are enough to make one’s teeth ache.

        And knock off that antisemite bullshit with your “YID! YID! YID!”

        llozozozozlzlzlzlzozozozlzlzlzozozlzlzlzozozlzlzozozlzlzlzzlzll


      • on June 3, 2013 at 6:44 am Seraph

        YIP! YIP! YIP!


      • on June 3, 2013 at 7:21 am Greg Eliot

        That’s dogspeak for “gots nuthin'”?

        You fairy.


  67. on June 1, 2013 at 3:22 pm AlphaBeta

    One vote for:

    “cute”

    The best game is using the game that women use on you


  68. on June 1, 2013 at 5:10 pm Errol Flynn's Porn Dungeon

    i like after a chick sends a couple of lengthy texts or asks an opinion a nice long hour pause and then…

    ‘i just shit my pants’


  69. on June 1, 2013 at 5:18 pm Nathan

    CH,

    Regarding the visual trichotomy of the Dark Enlightenment, here is a great visual of the theonomists:

    This is being sent around on various email lists.


    • on June 1, 2013 at 5:49 pm Greg Eliot

      Bravo… especially the mention of that Galatians verse which is all-too-often misrepresented… and by those that aren’t even Christian.


  70. on June 1, 2013 at 6:39 pm sup nerds

    boom! all 10 texts in one exchange.


    • on June 2, 2013 at 2:16 am Hermitsy

      Was that you or random internet dude?


      • on June 2, 2013 at 2:27 am sup nerds

        me, last night after reading this post.


    • on June 2, 2013 at 12:00 pm Chris

      That was beautiful.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 1:41 pm sup nerds

        i try.


      • on June 2, 2013 at 6:49 pm Patriarch

        Good exchange. Let us know when she texts you back.
        They always come back brah…


      • on June 2, 2013 at 7:44 pm sup nerds

        oh, she already did. we met up last night, had some drinks and i left her at the bar.


    • on June 2, 2013 at 3:52 pm Greg Eliot

      Most droll… golf clap.


    • on June 16, 2013 at 9:30 am isaac

      note how often she mentions that she “isn’t like that anymore”, about 3 times.
      she desperately wants to convince herself that she isn’t like that.

      as we know though, all bishes are like dat.


  71. on June 1, 2013 at 11:47 pm Cauthon

    The ascii dick. It’s glorious, and I speak from first hand experience. The best part about it is that it escalates the sexual tension without using any words.


  72. on June 2, 2013 at 2:16 am Text game overload | Study in courtship

    […] Source: https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/the-best-all-purpose-alpha-male-text-response/#comment-444… […]


  73. on June 2, 2013 at 7:41 am Cloud

    Off Topic,

    A new video that goes after The Young Turks: “The Young Misandrists.”


    • on June 2, 2013 at 9:14 pm Patriarch

      He’s a turk turd.


  74. on June 2, 2013 at 12:06 pm Chris

    never been a huge fan of gay, feels like it conveys butthurtness. While nah would probably be my favourite of the list – I mean whats better than saying no to a girl in an age where 99% of chumps always say yes – I vote the no-reply. Ignoring someone is a power move like no other; the heart of indifference, and thus the ultimate vag tingler. If you don’t reply, you leave her to think up 17,000 possible responses, instead of giving her a measly 1.


  75. on June 2, 2013 at 1:51 pm Anonymous

    Vomit. http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/06/01/3428551/supporters-pray-for-justice-for.html


  76. on June 2, 2013 at 6:57 pm dum cumster

    “A+”

    I love you
    “A+”

    We need to talk
    “A+”

    I forgot the movies
    “A+”


  77. on June 3, 2013 at 1:15 am Iron thumb

    “gay” works every time for me; but my second choice would be the 8===D seems nice


  78. on June 3, 2013 at 8:02 am Chadd Gets Laid YO!!!

    What does tl:dr mean?


    • on June 3, 2013 at 8:20 am The Man of Mystery

      too long; didn’t read


    • on June 3, 2013 at 8:53 am Patriarch

      Talk loud, deliver rape.


  79. on June 3, 2013 at 12:42 pm el_chief

    Still the King three years later. One vote for myself.


  80. on June 3, 2013 at 10:39 pm supra

    CH! I heartily promoted “next time” in a previous post and can be used in so many ways


  81. on June 4, 2013 at 8:08 am targ

    It’s not exactly on topic, but I wanted to ask whats the most alpha way of replying when a girl complains that shes always the one messaging me first (on facebook) and never the other way around.


    • on June 4, 2013 at 11:01 am Slang

      *My milkshake brings all the girls to the yard :)

      *That’s cause I’m trophy material, you gotta chase me, and wine me and dine me. This shit ain’t free.

      *I’m too sexy for facebook, too sexy for facebook, so sexy it huuuuuurts.

      Anything thats fun, and pokes a little bit of fun at her, without answering her question at all.

      Or you could ignore and redirect. This is only a delaying action tho.


  82. on June 18, 2013 at 4:18 am Anonymous

    This is RETARDED. Just get the app Alpha Text…the app is wayyyy better than what you have on here dude.


  83. on June 25, 2013 at 1:36 pm Pantallas de Leds

    The Best All-Purpose Alpha Male Text Response | Chateau Heartiste, interesante. Me encanta vuestra web.



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2015. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Steve on A Test Of Your Game: A Condom…
    pulsotic on A Test Of Your Game: A Condom…
    cheesetrader on A Test Of Your Game: A Condom…
    Sarapod on A Test Of Your Game: A Condom…
    Sarapod on A Test Of Your Game: A Condom…
    ragingindependent on A Test Of Your Game: A Condom…
    Putin on Literal Cuckservatives
    Regular John on Literal Cuckservatives
    Coldwarvet on A Test Of Your Game: A Condom…
    Coldwarvet on A Test Of Your Game: A Condom…
  • Top Posts

    • Literal Cuckservatives
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • Field Test: The MAXIMUM ALPHA MALE MODE Walk
    • Bottom-Of-The-Barrel Cuckold Fetishist, Or Spinster Hoax?
    • Why Is Randi Lee Harper, Fat, Drug-Addicted, Mentally Unhinged Liar, Still Working At Twitter?
    • Lindy "Immense" West Got Married...
    • Newsflash! Talented Tenth Ingrate Doesn't Like White People
    • A Test Of Your Game: A Condom Conundrum
    • The Measure Of A Man By The Women He Keeps
    • How To Walk Like An Alpha Male
  • Categories

  • Chaos

    • People of Walmart
    • PostSecret
    • Stuff White People Like
    • The Daily Sarge
    • Things My Boyfriend Says
    • xkcd
  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • The G Manifesto
    • The Rookie
    • Treatise of Love
    • VKs empire of dirt
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Information Processing
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • Mangans Miscellany
    • OneSTDV
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • The Harem and Mongol Hordes

    • Alias Clio
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • Gucci Little Piggy
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Hyperbole and a Half
    • In Mala Fide
    • Jack Goes Forth
    • Overcoming Bias
    • The Fourth Checkraise
    • The Rawness
    • Udolpho

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

The MistyLook Theme.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,285 other followers

Build a website with WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: