Satoshi Kanazawa has a theory that general human intelligence evolved partly in response to environmental novelty, and that high IQ people are more likely than low IQ people to crave novel experiences.
How did human intelligence evolve to be so high? Lynn [Lynn, R. (1991). The evolution of race differences in intelligence. Mankind Quarterly, 32, 99–173] and Rushton [Rushton, J.P. (1995). Race, evolution, and behavior: A life history perspective. New Brunswick: Transaction] suggest that the main forces behind the evolution of human intelligence were the cold climate and harsh winters, which selected out individuals of lower intelligence. In contrast, Kanazawa [Kanazawa, S. (2004). General intelligence as a domain-specific adaptation. Psychological Review, 111, 512–523] contends that it is the evolutionary novelty of the environment which increased general intelligence. Multiple regression analyses support both theories. Annual mean temperature and evolutionary novelty (measured by latitude, longitude, and distance from the ancestral environment) simultaneously have independent effects on average intelligence of populations. Temperature and evolutionary novelty together explain half to two- thirds of variance in national IQ.
Kanazawa has remarked that this theory explains why smarter people drink more than dumber people: Alcohol and its effects provide a novel mental and kinesthetic experience.
I can buy this. Based on personal observation, the smarties do tend to drink more, and take drugs more regularly. However, the less smart more often fall into crippling addiction when they take up drinking or drugs. It would seem the dumber can’t handle the novelty.
Masturbation is a form of novelty-seeking, particularly for men, because most masturbation material is hardcore porn featuring a variety of women (fatties, uggos and wall victims excluded — there’s only so far the concept of variety will stretch before it morphs into something grotesque). If Kanazawa is right, then I extrapolate from his theory that higher IQ people will masturbate more than lower IQ people.
Is there evidence for my inference? Inquisitive readers who want to collate GSS data, or who have access to any relevant studies, are welcome to try and find compelling evidence one way or the other. Operators are stroking by.
Note that I am asking for a fapping-to-prefrontal frisson correlation, rather than a sexual intercourse to smarts correlation. This way, we control for the possibility that smart people desire more sex than dumb people, but are less able (or willing) to fulfill their desires, leading to a misinterpretation of the results.
It may strike some as counterintuitive that smarties are more sexually charged than lunkheads, but sexual desire does recruit imagination centers of the brain, and imagination will be found in greater abundance in those with, well, greater brain abundance. “Vapid jocks” probably get more sexytime than the exquisitely self-aware, but that disparity could be just as much a consequence of the thwarted rocket-fueled desire of the smart as of the satisfied whitenoise desire of the dumb.
There is evidence that suggests that there is a political skew to masturbation, in line with a general trend of procreative vs. recreational sex (liberals trending towards the latter):
Sociosexuality -The Reproductive Dichotomy Theory of Conservatives and Liberals – Neuropolitics
Unfortunately, their data aren’t broken down by race.
As for IQ, there is one survey that suggests the opposite, that intelligent people masturbate significantly less, as told by Jason Malloy:
Gene Expression: Intercourse and Intelligence.
The fundamental problem with these however is that it’s impossible to know if one group actually masturbates more or less, or are just more or less honest about their habits.
In general, it appears that intelligent people have considerably lower sex drives overall than less intelligent people. Or, to be more accurate, the distribution appears n-shaped, with sex drive peaking at an IQ of 90 and trailing off on both ends.
LikeLike
I read once that acts involving the non traditional cavity were more common in lower SES groups. Or at least that’s what they admitted to. That really surprised me because I would have thought that upper classes would be more deviant because they had more imaginative ideas. I would think that higher intelligence correlates with greater imagination and greater ability to think of new and different ways of doing things. But I haven’t seen any data whatsoever that supports that hypothesis.
I wonder if high IQ men really do have more developed imaginations in what they want, but are less able to actualize what they want because they are more prone to being married and making sacrifices to sustain serious relationships. Hence, group activities and such might be more difficult for them to enact.
One this is for sure- high IQ men are more likely to have higher IQ female partners. I don’t know the difference between high and low IQ women, but if you are a guy who has had both, do lower IQ women have lower inhibitions? Like is it easier to get what you want out of them and does that enable you to do more extreme things?
LikeLike
In my personal experience, lower IQ women tend to be less exploratory than higher IQ women. The lower IQ women often had built in biases against certain sexual acts or ideas.
LikeLike
Yeah, that’s been my experience as well. For ex, low SES women won’t even try sushi.
All my experiences with people indicate that high IQ people should have richer fantasy lives and be more innovative in the acts they do, yet I have never seen any data that supports this.
[CH: Motivating factors matter. How many high IQers are boffing hotties?]
LikeLike
Is that the issue? High IQ men have a higher threshold for arousal, which they often are not getting, so they don’t bother enacting their fantasies?
I guess it should follow that if you are more r selected, you should be easier to arouse.
i do recall reading that people surveyed on interest in S&M were higher IQ than average, but then people become more willing to answer surveys as their IQ increases.
LikeLike
Also remember that often the higher the IQ the lower the social IQ. Very high IQ men in my work circles are almost always terrible with women and often bad at socializing with male colleagues as well. So why they might have a lot of fantasies, making these fantasies a reality is probably not an option for most of them.
LikeLike
For what it is worth,
In my personal experience, women who were more ignorant/less educated (but not necessarily low IQ) were more boring in bed/they lacked imagination.
Your results may differ…
LikeLike
i think it is about hormones. more masculine a women the more exploratory. this hasnt much to do with IQ. remember the woman who got screwed and killed in Turkey on her lone sojourns?
LikeLike
High IQ women are easier to fool because they are prone to rationalizing. You can’t fool a dog into thinking you don’t have a bone, but you can fool an educated woman into thinking you want to do more than bone her.
LikeLike
High IQ women are mostly not attracted to high IQ men, they just want their endless string of McBoyfriends (bad boys, musicians, especially anyone famous or poeerful in some way). High IQ men are rarely promiscuous and mostly just marry women with fairly average IQs.
Lots of women seem to think they are attracted to male intelligence but they’re just telling themselves what they think makes them seem quirky and hip. Go on Fetlife (kink attracts attention whores) and every other non-obese submissive on there labels herself a sapiosexual. Sapiosexuality doesn’t exist, I’m convinced. Bill Gates is literally a genius and everyone knew it, but he couldn’t get a woman until he was a billionaire and even then Melinda supposedly spurned him at first. It’s just not something that gets men selected.
LikeLike
Never heard of this site but my next dating profile might be on it. I agree that masculinity does a lot more for sexual exploration than iq. That ring finger of mine makes my sex drive painfully high. I can feel it.
LikeLike
When are we going to get Da Great GBFM’s viewz on da masturbationsioznz lzolzozz ?
LikeLike
If jacking off is a sign of high IQ, I must be a fucking genius !
LikeLike
First honest response here. The others are weakly hiding their (undeserved shame). Here’s some data for you. I’m very high IQ. (I just am, okay, not bragging.) And I am horny as fuck and masterbate 3 times a day. I remain anonymous here, as are you all, so why do you give a F about being honest. This kind of self control is not possible. My body needs to ejaculate 3 times a day. More data: I’m greater beta and I *have* had sex with real girls (not blowup dolls lzozlzolzlzo), in fact close to 20 of them, but not nearly as often as my body needs it. Hence I can rub one out 3 times in one night home alone easily.
LikeLike
high iq person can’t spell masturbate right….
LikeLike
This kind of self control is not possible.
You’re wrong.
LikeLike
High IQ people are more likely to control their urges, but they probably think about sex or masturbation as much as anyone else
LikeLike
I would think intelligence correlates positively with impulse control and future time orientation, causing them to masturbate less than their lower IQ counterparts.
Lower IQ people tend to indulge more in many areas, such as smoking and unhealthy food. Masturbation strikes me as more of an indulgence than a novelty.
LikeLike
I tend to agree… it seems the lower on the mammalian scale you go, the more various forms of autoeroticism take place.
And nearly all of the “he’d fuck a woodpile if he thought there was a snake in it” kind of guys I’ve known in my life were, at best, average to moderately dumb.
LikeLike
Agreed that intelligence correlates with future time orientation and impulse control, but I’d think masturbation is evidence for, not against, both of those things. (I mean, as long as you’re not doing it on the subway in full view of the other passengers and transit cops…) Masturbation is far less risky than intercourse by every yardstick I can think of.
LikeLike
oh please, give any man a choice to fap or fuck and guess what he’ll choose.
but, i believe since higher iq = wilder imagination, it’s be a bit more… interesting for the brighter ones
LikeLike
The question is, what type of man would think of using protection if he has the opportunity to fuck?
LikeLike
Higher IQ people have higher quality sperm. It suggests that:
“Lower IQ people tend to indulge more in many areas, such as smoking and unhealthy food.”
LikeLike
i think it is the opposite. high iq = higher control
LikeLike
I agree with this. Low IQ men and ugly women go together like a hand in a glove.
LikeLike
That’s contrary to high school jocks banging high school cheerleaders.
LikeLike
brain is still developing in high school. whereas the sex organs are way ahead in development. its the hormones baby.
LikeLike
The winners in high school are often, perhaps even usually, the losers ten years later, and vice versa.
LikeLike
Speaking of masturbation, here is an instructional video to ignite the burning passion of unbridled lust in a woman:
NSFW, so you know it’s gotta be good!
http://www.xvideos.com/video3462437/slutwoman_scene_4_-_kristina_rose
LikeLike
[…] heartiste.wordpress.com […]
LikeLike
NO FAP will do wonders for a man. It’s a powerful feeling knowing that he can master his own impulses, and thus reflects in everything he does. He’s more aggressive in work, play, exercise, poon hunting, etc. After a few days, there’s no irritation. All a man wants to do is own everything around him.
LikeLike
+1
LikeLike
I’m not going to begrudge a man a little pocket pool… so long as it’s not an away game.
LikeLike
Why not do it all?
It’s often a good thing to beat off before a session with your lil’ cutie-pie so you’ll be able to enjoy that first stick for a very long while; chip a little Viagra, say, 10 mg,, and you’ll be riding high and hard for at least a few hours.
Don’t forget to drink your celery, pineapple and lecithin shake a couple hours previous, and hell, 105 mg of OptiZinc won’t hurt that deliciously delayed ejaculation one bit.
In other words, don’t be afraid to enjoy your cock at any and all times, and on any and all occasions.
LikeLike
I don’t know the science behind it, but I’ve read in a few spots that NO FAP makes a man’s testosterone to shoot through the roof because his pent-up sexual energy has nowhere to go but other facets of his life such as work and working out. Thus, he’s more aggressive, confident and dominant. Also, his natural desire to shoot his load will eventually become so strong that he MUST game women in an effort to procure a mate that will take his load.
From personal experience, I can confirm NO FAPPING has made me a better man in the above regards.
LikeLike
This blog seems to have a lot of interesting material on the harmful effects of porn and batin’:
http://www.yourbrainonporn.com/
LikeLike
The effect is almost certainly brief and likely reverses itself over time. The endocrine system loves to balance these things out, esp. in the absence of positive inputs.
Better to blow your loads often and clear out the cream-pipe — very good for the old prostate.–
Instead of refraining from one of life’s most convenient delights, why not use every device to increase your testosterone and associated androgens to the point where masturbation will only heighten your appreciation of actual fucking?
Penis don’t fear the fapper.–
LikeLike
+2 I’m on day 8 (again) and I feel awesome.
LikeLike
I have to believe the opposite based on my knowledge of historical geniuses. Most of them were NOT drinkers or drug users. I think of people like Tesla, Ford, Wright Brothers, Edison, Lindbergh. The only exception is Steve Jobs’ praise of LSD. I think it could be interesting to try something like that, but drug use distorts the brain’s functionality more than it accessorizes it. Nootropic (mental enhancing) drugs are ok though. I just don’t find that smart people enjoy having their imagination screwed up with false perceptions. Reality is what we live in, and substances that alter our reality don’t help us interface with it better.
LikeLike
These days there is a regrettable tendency to equate high IQ with genius. There are many people with IQs higher than that of Einstein, but very few of them are geniuses, as they are incapable of the insights and works he and other actual geniuses have provided.
LikeLike
There’s also a regrettable tendency to mistake unmitigated self-flagellation as some sort of manifestation of intelligence.
LikeLike
Well, yeah, I would have thought sex drive would decrease with intelligence. Look at Asians: they are very smart race and a very unhorny race. There is another subset of people, who shall remain unnamed, who prove this theory but in the other direction.
LikeLike
Don’t let that inscrutable exterior fool you… why do you think so many of them developed those squinty eyes and buck teeth?
LikeLike
People often think of blacks vs. East Asians, but people tend to forget the perpendicular cases: Britons (smart, horny) on the one end and Austronesians (dumb, unhorny) on the other.
LikeLike
I don’t know about “Asians,” but of you think the Japanese are an “unhorny” race, well…
Their pornography industry is — by far — the largest per capita in the world. And their love hotels are very busy indeed.
These facts could indicate that the Japanese are somewhat “horny.”–
LikeLike
*if
LikeLike
Their sky-high rates of hikikomori and grass-eaters would suggest otherwise…
LikeLike
Actually, it’s quite the opposite. Read the post again. They are extremely horny, but they find other forms of release than actual sex, hence their diverse, richa and bizarre porn industry.
LikeLike
They are extremely horny, but they find other forms of release than actual sex,
Horny means you want sex. Actual sex, as in putting your dick in a cunt sex. At least, that’s what I want when I’m horny. Porn and fapping are no substitute for the real deal.
LikeLike
Talent aims for and hits a target that everybody can see. The world applauds.
Genius aims for and hits a target that nobody can see. The world scratches its head.
LikeLike
it’s just another part of reality. a different perspective. seeing from a different angle does help managing reality.
LikeLike
“Reality is what we live in, and substances that alter our reality don’t help us interface with it better…”
No. All is maya. We live beneath many layers of lies. Some natural substances that alter perceptions (THC, cubensis mushrooms, probably others) offer a way to drop some of the illusion-enabling infrastructure that Freedom-Lovers like Bernays have learned to manipulate with such predictability.
LikeLike
So it’s nothing really to do with masturbation per se, it’s to do with variety. Whether you get that variety from natural drugs (from sex/masturbation) or natural drugs (like tobacco) or synethetic drugs (like Crystal Meth) makes no difference at all.
I s’pose that’s an argument for visting a variety of blogs rather than hanging around the same one’s all the time.
LikeLike
It’s all been done before centuries before.
It was called abstinence.
Hindus and early Roman Catholic ascetics practiced this over 1000 years ago.
Look how that turned out.
LikeLike
How did it turn out? For whom? Not being sarcastic. I don’t get your point here.
LikeLike
I respect Kanazawa but Mayhaan said it a long time ago and as far as I know he didn’t need any degrees to come to this conclusion 😉
http://mayhaan.blogspot.com/2013/01/origins-of-races.html
LikeLike
Anecdotally, not on topic (fapping) but intelligent women tend to have more sexual imagination, more open to novelties (even if they’re only worth a single try), and are often kinkier. Downside is that they are also more often neurotic.
LikeLike
I agree
In my experience, women who had ( or seem to have ) psychological problems tended to be more kinky and more horny
The women whom you can not stand outside of the bedroom, are usually the best one inside the bedroom
Life is cruel that way…
LikeLike
Does sitting on your non-dominant hand until it falls asleep and then using it for the deed count as “variety”?
loozozozlzlzozozlzlzlzozozozlzlzlzzlzozozlzlzlzoolll
LikeLike
Hardcore is when you paint the fingernails and shave the numbed hand to look more “authentic”.
LikeLike
I also truly believe that smart people think more on a “big picture” mode and see themselves in a certain way in that picture…. to act like a “natural alpha male” (dark triad) goes against their “principles” thus hampering them by their over thinking of the philosophical justification of their adoption of such habits.
Sad really because the greatest seducers were also the most intelligent.
LikeLike
Anecdotally, and a little off topic (fapping). Intelligent women tend to have more sexual imagination, are more open to novelties (even if they’re only worth a single go), and often kinkier. Downside is that they also tend to be more neurotic.
LikeLike
wtf is up with all these “self-control” arguments? why would you need to “control” yourself when you’re alone in your home?
LikeLike
Is it time for The Master-Of-One’s-Own-Domain Contest yet?
I’m in… if only for sporting interest.
LikeLike
i lost it 2 minutes ago lol
actually, i’m on a schedule – mastering my domain during the week, releasing pressure on sunday. good things so far – i save up on tp. haven’t really felt that testosterone boost that’s supposed to kick in around the weekend yet
LikeLike
Such a study would require the assumption that porn and sexual fetishes are the same as sex. They’re not at all.
Cuckold fetishists, dominatrix customers, scat sex users, and so many of these other fetishes are almost wholly separate from the act of fucking (very often, they forbid it). They are ASSOCIATED with fucking, but are quite distinct from it.
I define “sex drive” as the urge to fuck women (or men if you’re a fag). Being whipped by a leather-clad hooker or stroking it for hours to Jewish-produced porn is totally different from fucking.
Thus, to claim that (white) men’s porn addiction is indicative of higher sex drive is absurd. Porn is not sex, nor are all the fetishes associated with sex.
Now, if one wanted to make the claim that smarter people are more likely to fall into sexual fetish addiction, I think that that’s a more reasonable theory.
LikeLike
Agreed. Sex drive and wanting to fuck women is healthy. Indulging a fetish is unhealthy, and, in my opinion, beta.
LikeLike
Also, I believe most dudes in the manosphere have seen this already, but just for those who haven’t and who might take this article as some cue to think that fapping to fetish porn makes them smarter, hold on a minute, tiger:
LikeLike
I stopped the daily masturbating to maybe once a month to once every three months, ever since learning game because harnessing that temptatious energy will motivate you to get laid.
LikeLike
I wonder to what extent this use of masturbation for new experiences has on guys’ willingness/ability to actually go out and score some pussy?
I was, and know, plenty of above average intelligence guys who masturbate a lot. Just spending their days studying/working a lot to become/be good provider betas, and masturbating to get their sex fix, rather than learning game and learning what women want to actually get some real pussy to satisfy their sex fix.
Meanwhile, lower IQ guys (dumb jocks, black guys, etc) actually got pussy to satisfy their sex fix, and if they couldn’t get pussy, they learned how to get pussy. Of course they did this young, so became “naturals.”
Meanwhile betas (upper or lower) keep whacking it and wonder why no girls want to be with their nice ass self by the time they get to their twenties, whereas the “naturals” who have gotten pussy since the age of 13… keep getting pussy into their twenties.
I for one got sick of masturbating alone (not so much a novel experience anymore) learned game, and started getting laid.
My other intelligent friends like the fact that I’m intelligent, but hate what I had to do to get novel experiences (learn game, accept the fact that women do not deserve the pedestals that they inhabit, etc)
So… maybe in this case higher IQ and more masturbation isn’t such a good thing? Or at least it needs to be known and dealt with accordingly.
LikeLike
It’s not a good thing per se, it’s just a coping mechanism. Most men, especially the intelligent ones (who probably read a lot) are utterly clueless when it comes to attracting women. And they usually operate in circles that consist of equally clueless people. How many guys do you meet who practice game (deliberately or naturally)?
LikeLike
I know a few naturals, and only one of them operates within a circle of “intelligent” people (he’s in medical school and a naturally good looking guy from a rich family).
In any case, the naturals I know generally do not operate in the same social circles as the “high IQ” types.
I have my old circles (pre-game days) and some new circles (post-game days) so I get a pretty interesting view.
LikeLike
Who cares though!
LikeLike
Male libido is more or less a measure of androgen receptor sensitivity and is ultimately dependent on endocrine factors:
http://joe.endocrinology-journals.org/content/186/3/411.full
If your testosterone levels are high and the testosterone (esp. its most potent metabolite, DHT) is highly available to the brain and gonadal/sensitive tissues, you will be distracted by thoughts of sex at almost all times.
This will be true whether the dude is dopey or brilliant.
************
If you want to thrive as a male, and you do, you want to have a diet high in saturated fats. You need a lot of dietary cholesterol to manufacture testosterone.
Stop “running” unless her husband is chasing you; stop taking statin drugs; expose your skin to the sun as often as possible, while avoiding sunburns; sleep as deeply as you can, and on a regular schedule; don’t be fat, do drugs, smoke or drink to excess; disregard any and all bullshit.
Squat to the bottom.
If your libido isn’t high you won’t want to jerk off all the f’ing time and you won’t be much of a man either.
It can be problematic in this culture to be a high-t male, because even “players” on “game blogs” will gawk at you like you’re insane when you turn around in public to stare at the perfect ass of that teenage slut in sweats. yoga pants, skintight jeans, etc. etc. how beautiful and dreadful it all is.–
LikeLike
Interestingly enough, even while taking steroids (even the more androgenic kind) it hardly had an effect on my sex drive. What really sent me over the edge was bromocriptine, which was used to treat Alzheimers. Couldn’t concentrate on anything on that stuff. That receptor sensitivity is probably a lot different from individual to individual.
LikeLike
“It can be problematic in this culture to be a high-t male, because even “players” on “game blogs” will gawk at you like you’re insane when you turn around in public to stare at the perfect ass of that teenage slut in sweats. yoga pants, skintight jeans, etc. etc. how beautiful and dreadful it all is.–”
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-murder-and-the-meaning-life/201201/the-7-worst-things-about-being-male
2. You have problems controlling your impulses. For years I taught students about psychological disorders in my classes on general and abnormal psychology. Whilst preparing my lectures, I was not shocked to discover that men are overwhelmingly represented in several diagnostic categories, sometimes called “impulse control disorders” – predilections that lead to alcohol and drug abuse, sexual misbehaviors of various kinds, violent outbursts, delinquency, problems holding down a job, and an overrepresention in almost all categories of criminal activity (with consequent overrepresentation in arrest records and prison terms). Prostitution is one of the few crimes for which women are more likely to be arrested, but that’s likely because women are much less likely to pay for sex, a topic to which I’ll turn next.
3. For a good portion of your life, you have an irrationally and self-destructively high desire for sex. By a “good portion” of your life, I mean two things: broadly, several decades between the teens and the fifties, and more proximately, many times a day during those long decades. One researcher found that among men between the ages of 18 and 25, fully 50 percent had thought about sex in the last 5 minutes. Among men between 26 and 55, “only” 25 percent were unable to go 5 minutes without thinking about sex. At the ripe old age of 63, I have a lot more productive thinking time (I often have whole half-hours uninterrupted by these distracting thoughts). When Kinsey did his classic surveys of sexual behavior, he found that men masturbated more frequently (only 5 percent said they never masturbated, and some people wonder if those guys were telling the truth). Kinsey also found that men were dangerously polysexual – he estimated that 40 to 50 percent of guys who grew up on farms had had sex with a nonhuman partner (cows and sheep must be more attractive than the squirrels and English sparrows we had in New York). Then there’s that rather shocking classic study by Clark and Hatfield which involved the line: “Excuse me, I’ve seen you around campus and find you very attractive. Would you like to go to bed with me?” (controls were asked if they’d like to go on a date). Around 50 percent of the college men said yes to the date, but over 70 percent were willing to go to bed with her. Those who turned her down were both thankful for the offer, and apologetic about saying no.
But on the plus side there’s this;
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-murder-and-the-meaning-life/201206/the-7-best-things-about-being-male
LikeLike
Don’t medicalize masculine sexuality. That’s a surreptitious way of castrating men and valorizing the androgyne.
LikeLike
Lance Armstrong must have an IQ since he likes sexual variety:
http://dlisted.com/2013/05/21/time-lance-armstrong-asked-comedian-april-macie-eat-his-ass-out
LikeLike
That’s a fame-seeking celebrity fucker. Nothing she says should be believed. (And I like how she claimed that she was morally indignant about joining in the orgy. Yeah, hookers talking shit on Howard Stern are class acts when they’re not on the air. Sure.)
LikeLike
Here’s my IQ theory (why it gets passed on).
When individuals are in a position to control their own environment, IQ plays a role in being able to survive to breed, and also to protect your brood. Building homes to protect you against the cold, but also agriculture, political alliances, long-term construction projects (mills, damns, bridges, etc.), are also part of this.
Political alliances are probably one of the crucial ones, and why Italy’s dynasties are so notable. They’d have to be geniuses to survive that long.
Whereas, if you can’t control (or don’t need to control) your environment, then IQ doesn’t matter. Oppressive governments will kill off people who try to control their environment to the government’s detriment, and geniuses that don’t try to do this will see their offspring deviate towards the mean (with fewer geniuses to set your children up with, your grandkids are less likely to stand out).
So, European Jews who were forbidden to own land had to survive by their wits. English yeomen who had legal rights to their property (homes -> castle) would prosper more if they managed their lots well (and moreso if they were already noblemen). German tradesmen would become wealthy if they were able to apply innovative methods to improve their products. Chinese bureaucrats would have more grandchildren if their children performed well on the current Dynasty’s government exams.
There are holes here, obviously. Japan was a pretty oppressive place for most of its history, but their IQ isn’t lagging, but it would take a lot of intelligence to survive the intrigue that permeated the clan.
The only thing I can say about Africa is that tribalism and big-man politics is no way to build a prosperous society.
LikeLike
Jews couldn’t own land? They owned ALL the currency and, therefore, the land. They always had the farmers by the balls through their usury, as when a bad drought came, the desperate farmers would take loans at absurd rates just to try to keep their land. Thus, gentiles became the Jews’ bitches.
TheOccidentalObserver recently had a staggering article about how the Magna Carta had two provisions in it which explicitly forbade Jewish usury, as the Jews were raping all of the landowners.
So then, why are Jews really so smart? The book, ‘The 10,000 Year Explosion’ has a robust theory about how Jews encourage breeding amongst their smartest (rabbis, in particular) while the weaklings were not supported at all.
[CH: That’s not what the 10,000 Year Explosion theory says. It says that Jews were restricted to white collar mercantile trades by laws of the time, and this caused a selection effect which favored the smarter, who had more kids and passed on their genes for higher IQ. That’s not to say rabbinical encouragement of selective breeding didn’t have an effect, but it’s not the main driver according to the theory.]
And, of course, the Jews accentuate their advantage with their wild levels of ethnic networking. This is why there are more white Jews at Harvard than there are white gentiles.
LikeLike
the Jews accentuate their advantage with their wild levels of ethnic networking.
This point is conveniently missed by many of those those who gleefully regale the tribe’s achievements.
LikeLike
Yeah, Greg Eliot.
I encourage all gentiles to spend some time researching the work done by Ron Unz (a Jew) chronicling the INSANE amount of Jewish discrimination at Ivy League admissions. Kevin MacDonald, David Duke, and several others dug into Unz’s awesome research and laid out the facts and, basically, Harvard (founded by Puritans) is essentially a Jewish front, nowadays. The WASP and anti-semitic dynamic shown in ‘The Social Network’ the exact opposite of reality.
LikeLike
The WASP and anti-semitic dynamic shown in ‘The Social Network’ the exact opposite of reality.
Of course it was… anything you see in the movies nowadays, meant to be a comment on social reality, simply consider as if a negative photo if you want the real story.
Much like the prison rapists are invariably white… and the wise mentors and friends all negro.
LikeLike
Yeah, I guess you’re right, there. (And also all the “hate crimes” by white males, too.)
But ‘The Social Network’ had such a veneer of realism and, of course, was “based off a true story”, and so the total lie was particularly jarring, in that case. (I’m not gullible about these matters, and yet even I was sucked in by ‘The Social Network’ and actually believed that Zuckerberg was an oppressed minority!)
LikeLike
The irony being of course is that Zuckerberg is a billionaire now.
LikeLike
How so, irony?
A few WASPs and a Jew get an idea, which later turns into a platinum mine.
Guess who’s the billionaire.
LikeLike
But Greg, physiognomic resemblence to the rat is a mere religious feature. 😉
LikeLike
The Egyptians, Hittites, Sumerians, Babylonians, Persians, Phoenicians, Carthaginians, Greeks, Romans, and Early Romans all dealt extensively with Jews and wrote what they saw. NONE ZERO ZILCH NADA thought they were smart. None. None worked as court physicians, architects, or the like. Militarily they were poor as well. Jews in the Ancient world were regarded as stubborn but not smart.
Nothing like the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, or Babylonians. Who did great things and left many of them to us.
LikeLike
“This is why there are more white Jews at Harvard than there are white gentiles.”
The distinction – genetic, ethnic, racial, and spiritual – between the Jewish Ashkenazim and White Europeans / European-Americans needs to be kept firmly in mind.
LikeLike
Remember the story about the jerk-off olypmics? The Japanese guy went for 9 hours? They’re a smart people, right? just saying.
LikeLike
People consider me pretty smart and I know I am above average but fapping was never an important part in my life, on average i’d say it’s been like max 4 a week since i’ve started.
On the other hand I have a friend which is below average, he knows it, everyone knows it and yet he’s the most chronic fapper I know of.
This is on a sample of 2 people but idk
LikeLike
i masturbattre alot because i have no hope of ever knowing the touch of a woman
LikeLike
The smarter you are the faster you understand things and get bored with them, so you keep looking for new things to do. Drugs and sex are easy and reliable entertainment.
LikeLike
So, Idiocracy was wrong?
LikeLike
I’m inclined to think that Idiocracy is right, and dumb people ‘bate more.
LikeLike
Frito bandito was a lawyer. Lawyers are among the smarter people of a society.
LikeLike
Probably intelligent people masturbate more because they can recognize the bullshit – like research the real effect of this act from the chemical point of view on the organism.
Stupid people can be induced to believe if they touch their penis baby jesus will cry and send them to hell, or they will become hairy and so on. Stupid people has less self control so instead masturbation they go around screwing their daughters or sisters – or altar boys.
LikeLike
<i<Stupid people has less self control so instead masturbation they go around screwing their daughters or sisters – or altar boys.
… or writing these sort of inane-beyond-inane posts.
Step away from the keyboard, kid… you’ll hurt yourself.
LikeLike
“Stupid people has…”
Nothing like pissing away your credibility and argument in the space of three words.
Tiresome cunt.
LikeLike
[…] Masturbation And IQ Home Masturbation And IQ […]
LikeLike
“I can buy this. Based on personal observation, the smarties do tend to drink more, and take drugs more regularly. However, the less smart more often fall into crippling addiction when they take up drinking or drugs. It would seem the dumber can’t handle the novelty.”
This is probably because higher IQ people all come from agrarian societies where alcohol was available for thousands of years. Races that do not have extensive history with alcohol (Australian aboriginals etc) have lower tolerance and higher propensity to addiction to alcohol.
All groups from the Eurasian continents have at least 10K years of exposure to alcohol. Those who couldn’t handle it have already largely been culled- probably in part because they were born with fetal alcohol syndrome.
Caucasians have the highest tolerance, the greatest propensity to drink and are the most functional even when alcoholics. Caucaisans are not the highest IQ race, but they are the race that subsisted on alcohol through the winter as a means of caloric sustenance. The rest of us just drank for fun, so we don’t have quite the same level of tolerance for it even though Asians and South Asians are fine at avoiding addiction to it.
North American native americans allegedly have higher IQs than central/South American Indians, but it’s the north American Indians that have higher propensity for inability to function due to alcoholism than central/South American Indians. I think this could be because meztizos evolved through thousands of years or exposure to heavy cocaine use, which doesn’t help their tolerance for alcohol, but it may help their ability to function as drinkers.
South Asians are weird. We are not known for any major alcohol product even though we have the ability to produce it (no sake, no vodka- nothing). Personally, I never drink. I have tried several times, but I do not like it at all. My grandfather and several relatives in his generation were heavy opium users. My psychiatrist tells me I am a semi-frequent drug user. Like my ancestors, I am all about getting high and not drinking. I have very high alcohol tolerance for my size despite rarely drinking. Drinking just does nothing for me. My ability to resist addiction and function as a “frequent drug user” is high.
LikeLike
You’re right. Northern Europeans seem to drink the most booze of anyone on the planet. In addition, I think there’s a reproductive angle to this. I once read an article about foreign women living in Britain and their experiences with English men, and while they generally loved having British boyfriends, one thing that struck them was how British men are so shy that they can’t make a move on a woman unless they’re blasted. Being (genetically) British myself, I can fully understand that. The men in warmer cultures seem to be able to better charm women without using alcohol.
North American native americans allegedly have higher IQs than central/South American Indians, but it’s the north American Indians that have higher propensity for inability to function due to alcoholism than central/South American Indians.
Mexicans are half-Spanish, which mitigates their problem, but they still seem to have some alcohol intolerance problems. Drunk illegal alien drivers are notorious here in the USA.
LikeLike
Theorizing is fine. But based upon my experiments though (an n=1 experiment), drinking causes listlessness, impotence, bloating, and anxiety. Two drinks, maximum, for me.
And I’m 100% European. So theorize away (and I’m sure our good friends in the mainstream media have PLENTY of studies “proving” how healthy guzzling beer is). But don’t mistake these foggy evolutionary theories for truths.
Oh, and dudes? Alcohol is death to your testosterone levels.
LikeLike
Isn’t it optimally healthy to have 2 glasses of wine a day.
I take a resveretrol supplement instead of wine. I hate alcohol that much.
LikeLike
drinking causes listlessness, impotence, bloating, and anxiety.
I drink when I’m happy and horny, not when I’m depressed. If I’m happy and horny, and then drink, then my game with hot chicks runs like a well-oiled machine. Drinking when depressed makes you more depressed.
LikeLike
A related fact is that Asian cultures discovered a lot earlier how to sanitize water. There is a hypothesis out there that European peoples started agriculture mainly to produce beer (earlier they made mead), although the kind of beer they made had only around 2% volume alcohol.
LikeLike
I imagine eating was a powerful motivation as well. :rolleyes
LikeLike
this is definitely skewed by cultural bias – e.g. here in the Czech republic is in pubs and restaurants beer cheaper than bottled water, almost everyone drinks it – but less intelligent people imho usually get wasted more…
It seems more true with marijuana, though…
LikeLike
I think it has more to do with introversion than intelligence, though they are strongly correlated.
LikeLike
@Heartiste So THAT’s why @King A seems like such a jerkoff in his writing!!!
-He’s so smart, he just can’t help it.
::ba-doom, tissh::
-Thankyouverymuch, I’ll be here all week. Try the veal; tip your waitress…
LikeLike
do talented chefs cook more for themselves?
LikeLike
German or Japanese porn would appear to confirm this. They’re also streets ahead in both manufacturing and genocide.
LikeLike
Smarter people are more likely to invent various “paracosms”, including elaborate fetishes that women are even less likely to indulge than their preferred form of sex, hence the higher wanking need.
LikeLike
I am a fucking genius so this makes sense.
LikeLike
This supports the idea that higher intelligence…to a point…means beta. The elite of intelligence tend to be alpha, but even the most intelligent submit to the baser thug.
I don’t know the stats, because I am just guessing, but my supposition is this:
If you had four men, of specific IQs, here is the status of said men:
70-80 IQ: Alpha
>150: Lesser Alpha
<70: Beta to Lesser Alpha
81-149: Lesser Beta to Omega
And this would skew the stats that more intelligence = more masturbation, because a great number of more intelligent men are betas to omegas. Think of the high school bands and chess clubs. They are going to masturbate because as betas and omegas, they are going to take the option of masturbating when sexually charged because they are not going to get the girl(the cheerleader) that arouses them.
The cheerleader is reserved for the quarterback, who may be failry intelligent, especially because of the higher scholastic standards required by schools today, but is not making high grades in the intelligence courses in great numbers.
Also, the higher intelligence is probably more aware of their personal mortality, causing them to make decisions that are skewed to personal survivablity…and are less likely to take chances that could adverse effects.
Also, given the fact that higher intelligence men tend to have the ability to manipulate the lowest intelligent masses, but inability to control the median intellegent masses.
The only counter to this is money. Money raises the level of a man.
Four men in imfamy who show this:
Al Capone/Bill Clinton: Alpha Alpha (but not the smartest man)
Albert Einstein: Pussy hound, but not the leader of men, other than other brainiacs.
The stereotypical redneck: Not very bright, but they procreate like there is nothing to do but, wake up, go to their blue collar job, come home, eat dinner, have sex, go to sleep to wake in the morning to repeat. However, they tend to be lovers of landwhales.
Mark Zuckerberg: Though among the richest guys in the world, his omegatude only allows him to get a fugly.
But, this is all just my opinion. I could be wrong.
LikeLike
A commenter on another website said his dad was stationed in New Guinea during the war and the New Guinea highlanders were the smartest people he had ever met. He put it down to having to outsmart the neighbouring tribes to survive.
Don’t know about their fapping habits.
LikeLike
Smartest as in “animal smarts”, which don’t require IQ. They couldn’t solve differential equations to save their life.
LikeLike
uh, no. Nobody’s dad said that, even if someone claimed their dad said that. Jared Diamond said it in his idiotic book, “Guns, Germs, and Steel.” While stupidly ignoring the fact that if tribal warfare could influence intelligence, it could just as easily influence propensity, tendency, and capacity for violence. But that wouldn’t fit into his “blank slate” theme.
LikeLike
senseiern Wonderful concept!
But I’d imagine a VERY SMALL MINORITY OF the 120-130 type to be King. Heartiste’s SMV value for men clearly stated that 100-120 is fairly intelligent and optimal for learnign game but avoiding the neuroses, social awkwardness, depression, and intellectual curiosity that hits the 130+ crew in waves.
Followed by the 80 IQ thugs.
Followed by ubergeniuses.
Followed by other above average intelligent and retardds.
Followed by just about any catergory.
LikeLike