Principles? Is that the name of a new coffee roast? PS Bushitler!
-
Pages
Twitter Updates
Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.
Recent Comments
HoneyBear on The Confound Of Silence Popcorn Out on Mocking The Globohomo Cor… HoneyBear on The Confound Of Silence Captain John Charity… on “Conspiracy Theory… Captain John Charity… on “Conspiracy Theory… Captain John Charity… on “Conspiracy Theory… Captain John Charity… on “Conspiracy Theory… Harold on The Confound Of Silence oink on The Confound Of Silence Morphine1 on The Confound Of Silence Top Posts
- Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
- Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
- ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hivemind Is Real
- The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
- Manifest Depravity
- The Diminishing Returns Of Anti-White Virtue Signaling
- Beta O'Rourke
- Revolutionary Spirals To Civil War 2
- The Confound Of Silence
- The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
Categories
Need more beta of month posts to cheer me up
LikeLike
The Republic is dead. Let it burn.
LikeLike
You have no idea what you just said. I don’t even realize just how bad it’s going to get, and it’s going to get real bad.
LikeLike
Yes, I do know what I just said. Society’s going to collapse. But the longer we delay the inevitable, the harder it will be to rebuild.
LikeLike
Too bad we’ll unable to meet again and rejoice in how right we all were.
LikeLike
Says who?
LikeLike
Classical music proves these kinds of statements to be assinine. Four hundred years ago, in the 17th century, amazing classical music was made with acoustic instruments, long before the internet or even *electricity*. Society was cultured and eventually got where we are today. Barring an asteroid collision or some other massive change to our environment, humans will be fine. But there will be mass starvation and suffering for some generation at some point when the population correction happens post peak oil, but no, you don’t want to be alive for that period nor do you want your children to be.
LikeLike
More interesting would be a table based on race, not party identification. Let’s find out if whitey is still fuming that there’s a black man in the White House.
If I had to gamble on it, I’d guess it’s a wash: subtract those waciss whites from the “approve” column while adding in Osama’s blue-state limpswisher buttbois and the 47ers, and you’d get an unchanged number.
LikeLike
Probably not. Fear and ignorance crosses all demographic lines.
LikeLike
This is the most criminal administration I have ever seen. This is not a race thing; this much more fundamental than that. This is about whether we want to remain a first world nation or not.
LikeLike
You were obviously out of the country from 2000-2008.
Obama ain’t started nothin’ that Bush didn’t already lay the groundwork for. And he’s stopped some of the worst abuses.
LikeLike
Name some. I think you od”d on Koolaid again. Of course, you’re from the stupid state and think differently from the rest of us. I’m looking forward to the day I no longer have to consider you my countryman.
LikeLike
I think you allow the censorship by ommission and the lack of outrage in the press over these rather egregious Marxist sins to color your perception of things. Yours is not an objective statement. I’m not aware of any laws that Bush broke. Opie has already broken more than I can count and simply shrugs it off, while you and your cohorts pretend nothing is wrong. I guess we’re back to “no enemies on the left” and once again my conclusion that Marxists can’t be argued with is proven correct. He certainly never targeted the likes of us here for further scrutiny. Sorry, but your party wants to kill me and take my property or reduce me to slavery for the sake of your precious brown people. Why do you assume that if you make nice they will make nice back?
LikeLike
Tyrone, since you were obviously in a coma for eight years, here’s a quick summary:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/4228722/George-Bushs-20-worst-moments.html
Read all 20 and make sure they sink in. Also, note that this is from a British newspaper.
LikeLike
I seldom agree with Jason, but Bush was cut from the same cloth. Obama accelerated it, because he’s sacrosanct to Democrats and he’s got a lot of Republicans who’d do the same if they were in office.
LikeLike
It is most certainly a “race thing”. The first-world status of a nation is determined by the racial character of its inhabitants. If the black and brown races could lift their nations out of sickening squalor they’d be doing so. If they could maintain governments and infrastructure given to them by the white man they’d be doing so.
This isn’t difficult to understand.
LikeLike
“If they could maintain governments and infrastructure given to them by the white man they’d be doing so.”
———————————————————————————-
anybody powerful enough to give you something can easily take it away.
LikeLike
You are absolutely right,
Western nations have been helping Africa for over 60 years not only with many Billions – yes Billions of dollars donated -, but also with thousands of other things from education to sending thousands of health professionals etc etc
and nothing has changed
nothing
It is as if we spent billions of dollars watering rocks expecting flowers to grow.
Rocks are not flower seeds.
LikeLike
A table on race for voting for Obama is enlightening, too. 97% of blacks voted for the black man. Ninety-seven percent. That’s racism, you stupid fucking moron. If 97% of whites voted for Romney, thousands of disingenuous white liberals would’ve committed ritual suicide to assuage their white guilt. Racism is alive and well in America, and its not confined to the suburbs. You stupid, addled, mouthbreathing pigfucking pile of moronic dog-shit.
It’s especially ironic that you make this comment in response to a post entitled “Tribalism.”
LikeLike
On the other hand, I guarantee tons of guilty white people voted for Obama because he’s black, and therefore “hip” – This is also racist. I’ve never seen such outpouring of unwarranted support for a politician EVER, and it’s more than likely because, when you scratch the surface, he’s a novelty because of his race. I highly doubt a white politician with the same views would get the same support.
LikeLike
I know several people (all white females or blacks) who voted for Obama because he is black.
He would have never won had people chosen to look at his white side. He won because he is black not in spite of it.
LikeLike
I wonder what’s behind this. I don’t believe it’s simply a matter of having a different party in the White House. For example, why are independents more approving of surveillance now?
LikeLike
Most independents are Democrats who think they are too cool to register
LikeLike
I’d have to see some numbers to believe you. I know plenty of independents who lean right (myself included). I know that’s just an anecdote, but I don’t believe that being an independent is somehow more attractive to Democrats.
LikeLike
Lolololzzozoz. http://www.lightlybraisedturnip.com/story-for-women-on-matchcom/. Plolplolzzz
LikeLike
Maybe because they were thinking, “Oh, both parties are into surveillance now, that must mean it’s not all that bad”
LikeLike
as with a lot of other things under obama, people are on some level reluctant to disagree to avoid feeling racist. as it becomes removed from obama directly, people are willing to say stuff is shitty, but their approval of the man still is high.
LikeLike
Betas gonna beta gonna beta gonna beta
LikeLike
Most people want to be slaves.
LikeLike
Which correlates with what they deserve. Truth hurts.
LikeLike
Most men do not desire freedom but seek rather, a just master. Mithradates VI, King of Pontus.
LikeLike
And here I was actually hoping that the people would rise up.
Heart is broken, the constitution is used as toilet paper. All the honor in the world is thrown into the gutter. Feel like crying, I’m just gonna go out and concentrate on picking up girls and working hard to save myself.
My stupid stupid Jewish brothers. Short of a miracle from Heaven you are about to relearn the meaning of the word “Hell”.
LikeLike
i have a hard time seeing the point in fighting it when i see something like that too. imagine how snowden feels.
just get some poon, while away the hours, and in my case bail out of the country if i outlive my parents.
LikeLike
LOL! The first time I read your post I thought you wrote “you are about to relearn the meaning of the word “HEIL” ! Really!
LikeLike
Feel like breaking down and weeping. The glory of our time is cast to the ground. The constitution has been thrown aside by criminals and slaves. Good men are crushed and the innocent are being hunted. My heart is empty.
LikeLike
Nil desperandum, brother. The greater the challenge, the greater the glory. Love the war.
LikeLike
totally would love to embrace that, man, and i do respect it. but when we should be building castles to the sky it’s depressing to be running to stand still instead. the hordes of mens’ lives being burned to the ground to feed these machines is unbelievable. winning at this point would be just getting back our birthright of freedom, there’s no way to get all this time back.
LikeLike
“Nil desperandum”. Wasnt that from Rocky IV?
LikeLike
How did that little refrain go? These are the times that try mens’ souls…
LikeLike
Mongol General: Conan! What is best in life?
Conan: To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.
LikeLike
Unless you are the one who dies first… No use in glory if you’re dead.
LikeLike
As long as the food stamps keep coming, a certain segment will support BHO no matter what.
LikeLike
I bet that ‘certain segment’ has a lot of racist Blacks in it!
LikeLike
Why are these surveillance programs bad? I get that its a problem for the government to prosecute people for what they say but to monitor them? What’s the problem there? I don’t care if the fbi reads my emails. Should I?
[CH: Would you care if I had unlimited access to all your private emails?]
LikeLike
I can already find out info about you by google image searching just the legs in your photo. Does that bother you?
LikeLike
[CH: Would you care if I had unlimited access to all your private emails?]
Forget it, CH… broads don’t understand because they never say anything that the surveillance complex would find interesting.
LikeLike
Women have no comprehension about the danger of trading liberty for security. They are security oriented.
That’s not the worst thing in the world if they remain domesticated: we want mothers to be horrified at the prospect of their child being insufficiently protected while he grows to manhood. But it also makes their suffrage a disaster to our republic: hello, infinite nanny-state and perpetual panopticon.
Also, feministx is an exhibitionist, so in her solipsistic mind there is a positive case for intrusion.
Matt
LikeLike
Actually, one of the research products I work on involves monitoring every single thing voluntary participants do online. I see their search key terms, the urls they go to, what they download.
People are willing to get paid a couple hundred dollars to have me look at them search “how do you know if you are pregnant” then “what if the pregnancy test turns blue” and then “planned parenthood Brooklyn”. A lot of people continue to look at… ummm …sources of visual stimulation even while we are monitoring them as individuals. Some of my studies have only a few dozen participants and I know exactly who all of them are. People sign up for this pretty easily, amazingly enough.
But it is different if you aren’t signing up and have no choice about the matter I suppose. Still, I have no problem with the govt watching all the youtube videos that muslims are watching. I don’t care if that involves me letting them have access to my personal emails.
You are right, BTW. I don’t care about govt intrusion because i like revealing details of my personal life to the random public. I don’t like being alone in my head. I would feel better knowing that several fbi people like to read all my emails. Would feel flattered.
LikeLike
I’m guessing the race. Guessing … guessing …
The preponderance of sheeple is not at issue. They will always constitute a majority. They will just as easily baaaa as they shuffle into one pen as the other. What matters is the aristos, the elite, the leadership.
Let’s make you president!
Atmaja Singh Kapoor Malhotra Night Shyamalan Srinivasaraghavan in 2016
LikeLike
That’s a good idea, but I wouldn’t be old enough to run.
LikeLike
It is challenging to stay alive at weights above 300 kg. Three hundred is not a threshold – doubtless there is a continuum – but it is the 300 kg–plus people who come to the attention of a hospital, when their bodies start to die around them. I have been involved with, and heard of, a handful of such patients. They were all house-bound because they were no longer able to walk. To remove them from their houses required the state rescue services to demolish door frames. The state’s bariatric ambulance must be mobilised. (A standard ambulance can only take a person weighing up to 220 kg.) The patients require special beds, special scanners – sometimes in the zoo
zlozlzozlzlozlzozl zlzolzozozlzlllzzozooz
LikeLike
No. The elite,the leadership,are the cocksuckers that are destroying the country. We got a new Pope. the 1st thing he says is”Help the poor”,which is,admittedly,Catholicism 101,but I am thinking,”Jesus,the poor are fat,lazy good for nothing assholes!” Thats what we gotta do? Give ’em more stuff?? The elite are scum,the “noble poor” are trash,so it kind of leaves the great middle.The leaders we need sure as hell wont be any aristos.
LikeLike
By what? Eighteen months or so?
Some things are worth amending the constitution for. Just integrate the amendment into your campaign. Herded sheeple will flow into any pen Daddy Shepherd lays out for them, including a path to the Kosher butcher, as you demonstrate in spades.
If a national campaign just seems like all so much bother, then stand on the street corner and offer your vote to the first alpha that walks by. Do something with your cuntry to do something for your country.
Matt
LikeLike
Do you think my constant youtube viewing of Riahnna vids could come back to haunt me? Other searches I am unsure about: Increase penis size,How to perform cunnilingus;Do Asian women like white men,Do Black women like white men;How to leave your body…
LikeLike
You assume that you will never pay any penalty for their knowledge of your actions. Why? Civilization is held together by the social contract that is the family. That link has now been broken, by women. You will disenfranchise most men and they will cease to listen to you. In 3 or 4 generations, you have Haiti.
LikeLike
I would try to explain the numerous logical flaws in your statements here, but it would be wasted effort. Like most women, you are unable to extrapolate from current political/cultural facts to future consequences. Your self-centered little world is all that matters to you.
Sadly for America, voters with similarly foolish views outnumber the rest of us. You’re dooming us to societal collapse and bloodshed and tyranny, yet when it arrives you’ll be squealing in dismay and confusion, wondering why the mean people are hurting you.
LikeLike
“Still, I have no problem with the govt watching all the youtube videos that muslims are watching.”
You are a disgusting cunt you know that?
LikeLike
‘Women have no comprehension about the danger of trading liberty for security. They are security oriented.
Many Social Scientists believe that the ‘Woman Vote’ is what gave Hitler so many votes in 1932…
The next stop for the incipient Totalitarian America may be Hitler-y Clinton…
LikeLike
I’m glad you like to arbitrarily blame women for random stuff you think goes wrong with society, but notice how majority male republicans were feeling about this “totalitarian” measure a few years before today.
LikeLike
Women are guilty. Often. Emotionally charged run around in circles chicken full of drama, arrogance and feelings of self entitlement.
btw I’m a woman.
LikeLike
‘Blame women for random stuff’???
It appears you have mis-underestimated me.
I am not some Archie Bunker hopped up on base misogyny, but instead have spent YEARS reading and carefully considering the works of geniuses like Arthur Schopenhauer, Otto Weininger, and Baron Julius Evola to help formulate a formidable intellectual account of Woman.
LikeLike
If you were an anonymous govt official, personally, I wouldn’t care.
[CH: Until the day I decide to use details from your private life against you. Then you’d care. But it will be too late.]
LikeLike
In a nation where the average person unwittingly commits 3 felonies a day, you are at the mercy of the state. Who’s guilty changes on a whim. That’s not what America’s about.
LikeLike
The thing you, and most others, miss is that ANY power given to government has to be examined with the idea in mind that it will be abused in the worst manner. Why? Because history shows the chance of that happening to be 100%.
What if there is an anonymous official that happens to be a serial rapist, trolling for his next victim. You have given him access to most of the information he needs to add you to his victim list. Can’t happen? A police officer did it a few years ago in central Illinois, using the information he obtained from women filing complaints at his station.
LikeLike
The problem is that muslims exist in the US. There is no realistic way of forcing all of them to leave (which would be ideal). As long as they are here even as 1 or 2% of the population, they pose a danger. And their support comes from outside the US, so we can’t monitor only Americans. And frankly, I definitely don’t care about the civil rights of people who are not in the US. Even if I was severely opposed to monitoring americans, I wouldn’t care of the US felt like monitoring Saudis. The 2nd ideal situation would be to perform surveillance on only muslims as they are realistically the only group with a pattern of terrorist attacks against the US. This is also not legally an option, but it could be a practical option if the govt’s written policy is to monitor everyone even if they only monitor them in practice.
This isn’t about giving up freedom for security. It’s about theoretically giving up your own privacy when realistically you are sacrificing someone else’s privacy.
If we have one law that says we can be monitored, we can still have freedom as long as there is another law that says that the govt can’t for instance, accuse of illegally downloading a movie when they found out about it by spying on you. The govt should only be able to take action against an individual based on information they got when spying on them if the individual had some kind of involvement with terrorism.
LikeLike
The problem is that muslims exist in the US. There is no realistic way of forcing all of them to leave (which would be ideal).
Wrong. Queen Isabella and the 1990s Serbs knew how to deal with that problem.
LikeLike
in 1990 Muslims were not a problem. I am Croatian and not a Muslim but please educate yourself before proclaiming unprovoked genocide of women, children and elderly, rapes, carnage and hell on earth relocation as a ‘Muslim problem’. Idiot.
LikeLike
See you Chuparosas shit and download all my good sit there like I persevere of an actual woman making out with a cat on YouTube and you didn’t put it through
LikeLike
Oh, believe me, it’s not unprovoked. In Britain, they’re beheading soldiers and raping white teenage girls. And then there’s that fellow who massacred our troops in Fort Hood, and the Boston bombers.
Idiot.
LikeLike
“women, children and elderly”
Because young, male adults aren’t humans
LikeLike
“Oh, believe me, it’s not unprovoked. In Britain, they’re beheading soldiers and raping white teenage girls. And then there’s that fellow who massacred our troops in Fort Hood, and the Boston bombers.”
>some “muslims” commit murders and criminal acts
LOL LET’S COMMIT GENOCIDE AGAINST THEM
I would rape your daughter too while you are tied to a tree, forced to watch.
How would you like that you flaming faggot?
LikeLike
Oh please. You muzzies have been ethnically cleansing Christians for centuries.
But since you and your Croat bitch have your panties in a bunch, I’ll just settle for expulsion.
LikeLike
How would you like that you flaming faggot?
What’s it with muzzies being obsessed with faggotry? Oh yeah, because they invented it.
LikeLike
You’re lucky I don’t know where you live or I would slowly mutilate your genitals.
LikeLike
KOSOVO JE SRBIJA, fucker.
P.S. I’m armed.
LikeLike
ah men. the one above and the one below. same and corvinus. you need two sentences to flare up and the war has started. you display everything that is wrong with ‘men’ today. you are not men you are fing pussies. and even that dear sirs is being too nice and giving you a compliment.
with men like you i wish i was a lesbian.
LikeLike
No. No no no. Wrong. Pussies just roll over and take it. BAD woman. No doggie treats for you.
LikeLike
dearest corvinus
you’re right. you’re still alive though so I can see how valiantly you fought for Kosovo when the need arose. Or against Muslims, when the ‘need’ arose.
Semantics can’t help your cause machan. You are not only a pussy but you also bullshit a lot. I’d say you are a narcissist that was continuously touched as a kid.
i’ll let you have the last word since it seems so important to you. the floor is yours.
LikeLike
You are not only a pussy but you also bullshit a lot. I’d say you are a narcissist that was continuously touched as a kid.
Your ass-umptions are ass-backwards, and you don’t know jackshit.
LikeLike
“You’re lucky I don’t know where you live or I would slowly mutilate your genitals.”
Do you promise, honey? I’ve been burned so many times before. Well, not burned, but that’s the problem.
LikeLike
First they came for the communists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist.
Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Jew.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Catholic.
Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.
Orwell + Huxley = USA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came…
LikeLike
They need to come for the communists in this country.
LikeLike
They ARE the communists.
LikeLike
That’s all well and good, but they monitor people like us instead because we question the narrative. This is a game about maintaining and accreting power within their sphere of influence. They don’t really care aout protecting you as much as they want to use it a pretext for monitoring you instead.
LikeLike
feministx
The problem is that muslims exist in the US. There is no realistic way of forcing all of them to leave (which would be ideal)
—————————————————————————————–
You gotta be kiddin me?
Your brown ass would be one of the first to be jumped and beaten senseless.
Are you fucking a white man?
LikeLike
I’m anonymous. Would you care if I read it?
LikeLike
God bless her,but dear femisnistx is not one to hide her light under a bushel basket! Go to her site and listen to her sing. I admit I have a soft spot(or hard hehe heh) for this broad. Next…open beaver! You can do it fem!
LikeLike
yeah yeah! They are here: http://feministx.wordpress.com/2013/06/11/my-songs/
LikeLike
You think you have nothing to hide. What if tomorrow, President Hillary declares CH to be hate speech, and you are a member here? Federal crime, bitch!
LikeLike
Privacy is a fickle thing. We love our own privacy, but we hate other people’s privacy. My privacy protects me. Your privacy could be dangerous. If I interact with you on a regular basis and we are in some way antagonistic (which I don’t hope, sugarlegs) and you have an advantage in information against me you could destroy my reputation.
This ties in a bit into the elimination of judgement some people seem to advocate.
The basic idea is that either we have a doctrine of mutually assured destruction (no privacy) or protection of privacy. You don’t want asymmetric privacy because it puts you in a weaker position. They can use your secrets against you, and their secrets against other against you, and you have no defense. And they can even make shit up.
And in this case, your privacy applies to your peers, but not to an unnamed, unaccountable cabal of people who might not have your interests in mind. The people in government agency are not the best elements of our society. They can, and are, predators and rapists and whatever.
Imagine some fat, bald NSA agent deciding that you are a good target because you posted revealing pictures back in the day and now he can go out, stalk you, rape you (with a 2″ penis) and destroy all the evidence later on. And then he’ll enter in the computer that you hate the government and haven’t paid your taxes and made tons of false accusations in the past.
LikeLike
The common attitude I hear is “if some G-man really wants to waste their time reading my e-mails to my boss or listening to me discuss reality tv with my friends, why should I care?” Sure, there are some really private/territorial people out there but most people really couldn’t give two shits.
Authoritarianism is inevitable. Make the best of it. You can’t invent things like drones and expect governments to not use them. It’s just not going to happen.
LikeLike
You are not controlling for different eras and different national moods. Bush’s first authorization for warrantless wire-taps was weeks after 9/11, in Oct 2001. Nonetheless, it was abandoned, and the PATRIOT act provisions — which are being used to rationalize the legality of this latest encroachment — passed with overwhelming margins at the time and should have sunset by now. Indeed, even in the uproar of the emergency, congress succeeded in putting those automatic expirations into the law.
Turning this into a crude “gored-ox” partisan calculus is just bad strategy. What’s the point of it, other than to get conservatives to second guess their coming around to the opposition?
Fools. Instead of taking this political victory presented to you on a silver platter, you’d rather crow, “I told you so.” No wonder you never rise out of the margin of error in any political contest.
It’s not “tribalism.” It’s called “party politics,” which, unlike principles, shift according to circumstance. To discern an inconsistency in principle among a dozen other much more obvious variables is to be suicidally selective. You content yourself on the margins bitching and moaning rather than acting effectively. Always satirizing, never plotting.
Matt
LikeLike
Mr. King has a good point, as he so often does.
There has also been a qualitative and quantitative change in the program.
Under Bush, foreigners and trans-border calls were monitored. That was a reasonable and allowable response to AQ and other terror networks.
Under Obama, EVERY person on the globe, US citizen and not, has their electronic communications monitored.
LikeLike
This is too important to make a Bush/Obama thing. If allying with libertardians means denouncing GWB, fine, that’s already done. The DHS and TSA and TARP were never my favorite things, even if you have to compromise in politics.
Now that CUNT Boehner is calling Snowden a “traitor.” Am I to be lumped in with that crybaby weirdo rubber-stamp of a Speaker because I think Republicans are a sight better than Democrats (and much better than the teenage joke of the Libertarian Party)?
Paul, Cruz, Rubio, Lee. Who else? Inhofe? It’s such a short list, and getting shorter. But I will remember who denounced the king before the revolution, and well before the victory, when it was risky to.
Liberty has many fathers in the abstract but will always be an orphan in the application, when it requires tangible sacrifices. There is no constituency for freedom. Who, pray tell, represented the interests of 100m citizens during the FISA proceedings? The hack judge’s sense of fairness and goodwill? Is that why they have rejected only 11 out of 39,000 applications to the court?
Seriously, just give us the thirty sparcely-populated states in the middle of this country, and we promise to leave you alone to your tyrannical human experiments. Give us the dustbowls and the big-sky steppe. We’ll see how long NY and CA remain centers of international influence before they turn into Detroitian moonscapes. It’s not geography that makes us great.
Matt
LikeLike
This kind of federal overreach is kind of similar to the last civil war.
LikeLike
Nope. It happened to anyone, any time. Only constraint is storage capability. But it’s not a targeted thing. All communication is recorded, and the secret court decided whether it’s used or not.
LikeLike
I am surprised when I (rarely) agree with you; King A don’t lose your destructive instructive energy.
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
e-King Alpha ha ha Neo-Light
king A A contrarian trinitarian
investor against prevailing wisdom
first e-fist with the flowering flare on the e-pen
plops pure his blue bluenose puritan lops in heavy artisan blocks
everything smells like poop in this browning burnt Shit World The Western Hemisphere
full of fools and fat fear farts
mere lifeless fightless flightless non-Eagle-like
revolutionless motionless rotting herded unheard
fat and fed FED-ruled cattle, police-state property
properly pooperly located, abortive killjoy gays stabbing westward wasting at the backside of the globe
spoilsport soil-sort ashen assholes all of U.S.
indite indictment dickish dicker detective diction
judging U.S. as a correct erect anti-boner ethics lawyer pro bono
in lieu of his imaginary social order
e-Don Quixote firing bulbous rounds towards
brainfarting brain-fag windmills, monsters
his circular reasoning and ghostly white circle-jerks
the science mirrors do not sober him make
only laughing ever hardier more and on top of that over
the top spirit principle vexation
the tyler durden of anti-game, lives in the talent of
his self-gang’s e-doppelgänger energy of spectral spiritual rivalry chivalry
using hiSS Satanic feminist e-females masterfully as foolish fawning pawns in his holy e-Game
RAGE RAGE RAGE into the dawning nihilistic night of the technology don dawns
CAGE CAGE CAGE the animals coming home
So
bring ye tools of ravage rage devastation, sage on ye masters of e-war
let the brightest data-points sharp shine epiphanic ever more toward
neo-reactionary actuarial self-actualization’s syndicate sure shore allure lore
LikeLike
One of the reasons is that the main stream media is very much pro-Democrat
the same exact things when done by a Republicans are presented differently in the news than if a Democrat does it
The media is madly in love with Obama, they make all kind of excuses for him, and they sweep under the carpet a lot of the bad things he does
when Bush was in power the main stream media did the exact opposite
Most people are like kids at a magic show; they believe whatever the hell they see and they are too dumb or too lazy to analyze anything
if the media says NSA surveillance under Obama is good; they buy it
If the media says NSA surveillance under Bush is bad; they buy it
If the media says drone killings are ok under Obama , the people buy it
if the media says drone killings under Bush was evil; the people buy it
If the media says Guantanamo is a good thing under Obama the people buy it
if the media says Guantanamo under Bush is a crime against humanity; the people buy it
If Obama in a public address pronunces army corps ” army corpses” ( as in dead bodies ) the media sweeps it under the carpet ( it happened google it )
If Bush said Nukelar instead of nuclear, it is front page news for the next few years
and on and on…
LikeLike
Whoever selected Obama knew exactly what they were doing. They got both the white guilt vote and the stupid nonwhite (pardon the tautology) vote locked up. I’m almost certain that from here on out, whichever party the elites want to win will nominate some mixed-race wet dream.
LikeLike
Bro, Bush said “nucular” for 8 years and he’s a fucking moron. Period. 85 IQ tops.
LikeLike
Is your pretend name supposed to be “I want to bang YOU” or “I want to bang Jew”?
LikeLike
maybe he’s trying to bang a banjo?
LikeLike
How come he got better grades than Al Gore and John Kerry? Al Gore says his IQ is 139.
LikeLike
Al Snore is a classic high-IQ tard.
LikeLike
My favorite way of proving this is the “name the political party” game. On any news story, count the number of paragraphs before you are told the party affiliation of the wrongdoer. Simple, black-and-white, and easily measurable. You’ll usually find an (R) in the first paragraph, and a (D) below the fold.
LikeLike
Good find.
I was reading news articles about this today. In the comment sections underneath, liberals were complaining that conservatives had a schizophrenic attitude toward of this prism thing – in favour of it when Bush was overseeing it and against it when Mr. Obo was. It looks like there are more hypocrites on their side though.
Watch the racketeers over at SPLC ignore the flip-flopping of the left and write an article about that of the right called ‘The New Wave of Hate’ or some shit.
LikeLike
Liberals need to keep in mind that us Republicans have Ron Paul and Rand Paul on our side when it comes to fighting the surveillance state. We are actively in the ring trying to combat this thing!
All they have is Michael Moore down at the local Pizza Hut chomping down on the next slice and guzzling his soda pop… and Pizza Hut was even endorsed by Rush Limbaugh!!!!
LikeLike
Christopher Walken is pretty well known for not having a computer or even a cell phone!
If someone as high up as him can ‘live off the grid’, then maybe the rest of us should give it some thought.
LikeLike
So I kept the watch. Up my ass. For 5 years.
LikeLike
Where is the evidence that this isn’t a bullshit study and not propaganda? I don’t happen to trust numbers especially when numbers are repeatedly spun or outright fabricated.
LikeLike
We are doomed. Wonder what is next: “1984,” “Brave New World,” “Brazil,” “The Road Warrior,” “Blade Runner,” “We.” Better get the supercharger if it will be the Road Warrior.
Maybe “A Canticle for Liebowitz.” Sic transit gloria mundi.
LikeLike
Brave New World seems most accurate. High promiscuity, artificial womb, destruction of family et al.
LikeLike
Only they’re not bothering with the artificial womb bit because they say the world is overpopulated.
LikeLike
age 17 hottest age http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itz6uW40DJk lzozlzozlozlzozozlz
LikeLike
The future will be a conflation of “1984” and “Idiocracy”. The boot stomping on your face will be in the shape of a clownshoe, but it will be there nonetheless.
LikeLike
Great book.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on oogenhand and commented:
No comment necessary.
LikeLike
The issue with the NSA surveillance is that today _is not_ a straight line projection to tommorrow. What ever the NSA can’t find now with today’s data mining techniques doesn’t mean they won’t tommorrow or next month or next year.
“Total Information Awareness” requires total information control, which is why the NSA went to the FISA court to get a complete copy of all US domestic internet and phone activity for their files from all the major Silicon Valley internet firms.
IOW, they have a data mining time machine for your life on-line starting from several years ago.
And what the NSA can do now with $500 million in software will be a off-the shelf $50,000 in software seven years from now.
Consider the implications of that thought.
You don’t think Drug gangs won’t use that to do things like track down jurors in drug cases or to nail local police informants?
LikeLike
Excellent points. Things are about to get interesting.
LikeLike
See this link and think thrugh the implications of the NSA’s 1 billion data record a day domestic internet & cellphone network monitoring —
Using Metadata to Find Paul Revere
Jun 9th, 2013
London, 1772.
http://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2013/06/09/using-metadata-to-find-paul-revere/
LikeLike
FUCK THIS GAY EARTH
LikeLike
[…] Tribalism […]
LikeLike
I can’t help thinking the release of this domestic spying story is part of a Nixon/China event. We couldn’t release it during a Republican administration, or the coffee shop kidz would have a melt-down, and if we release it during a Democrat administration the grown-ups would just get mad for a few minutes then get back to work.
LikeLike
David, 16, had moved to East Hampton from Ecuador three years earlier, to live with his mother, who had left Ecuador for America when he was a toddler. And while it is almost impossible to divine with any certainty the motives in suicides, David was questioning his sexuality, family friends and officials with knowledge of his case said. There were allegations of bullying from fellow Hispanic students, and evidence of previous attempts to kill himself. Lololzzozzz. Pick faggot kills self New York Times doesn’t understand why LOL Z
LikeLike
Its funny how the white man keeps making the haystack bigger and bigger=
“I maintain that there is an inverse correlation between the technical abilities of the government to harvest data and their competence to use it for anything. The salient trend in our government is to become more inept, ineffectual, impotent, and feckless, no matter how big the compost heaps of sheer information it manages to pile up.”– JHK
LikeLike
I saw a woman today wearing a t-shirt that said:
“Boys are stupid. Throw rocks at them!”
above a cartoon of a little boy running from stones being thrown at him.
I am beyond disgusted in this society. Let it fucking burn.
LikeLike
holy shit snowden’s gf looks exactly like my sister. I need to make a phone call…
LikeLike
Heh, heh… I don’t even read all my e-mails… maybe some gummint drone can write me a synopsis.
But if any of you homos try to debrief me… I’ll kill ya.
LikeLike
Obama, is expendable. He is a puppet. He can’t function without a teleprompter. He voted present. A little late to rehash all this now, but all the signs were there.
LikeLike
I noticed in this country there are no political principles. If the President is a member of your party, you will support him. If he’s not, you won’t. Even if in the previous Presidency you didn’t support (or did) the President on the same issue.
As an American I’ve never voted and never will.
Plus, lets remember that patriotism is the idea that a country is great because YOU were born in it.
Having lived in 4 different countries I would either have to be patriotic to them all or patriotic to none.
I’m patriotic to none.
Plus my tradition teaches us that nationality is just another meaningless ego identification.
LikeLike
Has any revolution ever happened with the participants meeting in public?
LikeLike