• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Comment Of The Week: The Subtle Art Of The AMOG
Alpha Assessment: Terseness And Tingles Edition »

Beta Of The Month: The Divorce House

July 8, 2013 by CH

Is it really good for the children to see their father so pathetically emasculated on a daily basis? That’s the question that swirls around July’s Beta of the Month candidate, a broken man who continues living under the same roof (for which he likely foots the full bill) with his happy ex-wife in a refitted “divorce house” that’s partitioned down the middle.

Monica McGrath and Kent Kirkland are divorced parents of two young children. They live in one house with their children, call themselves friends and borrow sugar from one another.

The Edmonton family gained Canada-wide recognition this month after media attention turned to their family set-up and living arrangements. Part of this attention was due to their custom-built “transporter” house, with two separate sides and a hallway connecting them, but also because they’re doing what many separated couples say they want to do; put the kids first. […]

Their family model is a version of a “bird’s nest” arrangement where children stay in the house, while separated or divorced parents come to them. Some see this as a model that helps minimize disruption for children. It means they don’t have to be uprooted, trekking from one parent’s house to another’s on a regular basis. Although this model is still rare, experts say it has become increasingly common over the last 10 years. […]

The adults live on separate sides of the house with a wall between them. Their children’s bedrooms are at one end of the house and connect to both sides through a hallway with a door to mom’s side and a door to dad’s side. The parents alternate childcare week by week. When it’s one parent’s week, the other locks their hallway door.

“They’re both a lot happier now,” Mr. Kirkland says of their children. “Now if they want to see mom, it’s really easy for them to do it.”

Everyone in this family is smiling except for the house eunuch:

Details of his lurid soul castration follow.

They separated in 2010 and have already crossed the hurdle of dating other people, though both are currently single. Ms. McGrath and Mr. Kirkland say that their family arrangement takes priority and that a new partner would need to respect this.

Nine times out of ten in similar situations it’s the ex-wife who’s doing the banging with newly acquired pump and dumpers while the ex-husband has to stuff his ears with pillows to block the thumping moans of sex emanating through the walls.

But as might be expected, there are cons that come with living next door to your ex.

“The emotional side of things…” says Mr. Kirkland. “As Monica put it, there are still feelings and not all of them positive feelings.”

The only sure cure for an ex-wife is moving out of the country and covering all your tracks. Or, you can be all the beta you wanna be and share an exquisitely demarcated home with an ex-wife who loves taking photos of your hang-dog face to show the world how much she has your balls in a vise.

In related news, the West is still collapsing. Event horizon endgame should be any day now.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Beta Of The Year Contest, Marriage Is For Chumps, Misandry | 357 Comments

357 Responses

  1. on July 8, 2013 at 1:27 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    lzozozozoz

    tonight the bernankaifierz celebratez
    how they conquered a cuounrty with deslouled benrnakfied cuntz
    how they detsoryed western cicvilziataiozn
    not by detsorying the church buiodlingsa and unieveireteieisz
    but by ebenrnakifieying the soul
    and leaving the buildings standadtdingz lzlzlzo

    http://henrymakow.com/feminism_is_key_to_making_of_a.html
    “The science of enslavement was remarkably sophisticated
    and resembled feminist social engineering.

    Discrediting the male in the eyes of the female was a precondition.
    Ironically, slave makers yesterday and today are the same people.

    See more at: http://henrymakow.com/feminism_is_key_to_making_of_a.html#sthash.P9jMa50l.dpuf”

    lozozozozlzozozoz omg zlzozozozo

    “In a section called “The Breaking Process of the African Woman (the breaking process of the Americna Womanz lzozozo),” he advocated shifting her dependency from the African male (husband) to the slave owner (Federal Reserve System/Sate) . This is achieved by beating and humiliating the male (femisnista stsudies classes) in front of the female. : http://henrymakow.com/feminism_is_key_to_making_of_a.html#sthash.P9jMa50l.dpuf”

    lzozozozo omg zlzozozoozozoz

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 2:32 pm Supra

      Hey GBFM there’s a poster named Ronin who needs some guidance midway through the previous CH post about where a guy should derive his sense of self worth. Pls instruct in your usual effective manner

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 9:42 pm meh

        Is the boy wearing lipstick in the second picture in the original article? Ponder, long hair, lipstick, age 10, and he’s not running pre-stoner game. I sense major issues coming.

        The girl is already over 100 pounds and not even in eighth grade. I’m sure that will turn out well.

        LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 7:53 am Anonymous

      Gbfm as usual has a point. Assuming all the assumptions are true, are we really gathered here to laugh and jeer at the slave being beaten for show?

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:58 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzlozzo

        yes!!

        this is why on all the neococnz TV showsz and in all their feminsist stsudieesdes classes they beat men down!

        and then they wirder federeal resevre funds (Which place the men in debt) to the womenz to show the womenz that their true master is not god, family, and man, but the federal reseveres and their butt and gina tingeleosozo.

        and so we come to live in a world ruled by butt and gina tingelsosoelsz where men are ensaved to debt and to woemnz either by having to work to pay the taxes to fund tehir welfare of tehir bastard spawn, or via divocre alimonies, or child support, but the MENZ are reomed fro teh queation so they can lno longer teach the GRETA BOKS FOR MENZNZ which da bernannankifiers hate as da GREREAT BOOKSZ each of the TRUTH AND HONOR Which set us free!! zkzlzlzo zlzlzoz

        http://henrymakow.com/feminism_is_key_to_making_of_a.html
        “The science of enslavement was remarkably sophisticated
        and resembled feminist social engineering.

        Discrediting the male in the eyes of the female was a precondition.
        Ironically, slave makers yesterday and today are the same people.

        See more at: http://henrymakow.com/feminism_is_key_to_making_of_a.html#sthash.P9jMa50l.dpuf”

        lozozozozlzozozoz omg zlzozozozo

        “In a section called “The Breaking Process of the African Woman (the breaking process of the Americna Womanz lzozozo),” he advocated shifting her dependency from the African male (husband) to the slave owner (Federal Reserve System/Sate) . This is achieved by beating and humiliating the male (femisnista stsudies classes/tv sitcoms/movies) in front of the female. : http://henrymakow.com/feminism_is_key_to_making_of_a.html#sthash.P9jMa50l.dpuf”

        lzozozozo omg zlzozozoozozoz

        LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 10:58 am AAB

      I’d steer clear of Henry Makow if I were you. That guy peddles Illuminati nonsense like it was going out of fashion. A few years ago he was posting articles about Leo Zagami, a supposed ex-Illuminati who ‘went public’ and converted to Christianity, then a few weeks later converted to Islam, and then went off the radar. Makow’s ‘Bovine-Excrement’ meter is either lacking, or he’s completely full of it..

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 11:32 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        yes AAB,
        nothing to see here
        the decline of the west is NOT, i repeat IS NOT, happening.
        everyone move along now and go back to xboxing in your single mom’s basement and then heading out once a month in a furry hat to try and slip your tiny cockas into a pre-buttcoked bernankfified womenz after negging her with some pre-baked negs you found on line as
        such is
        the way
        it ever
        was.

        lzlzlllzlzlzozlozo

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 3:21 am AAB

        Ah c’mon man, there’s no need for that. I’m not dismissing the idea that there are groups of people working together whose actions are causing the destruction of White America and Europe (which is definitely true), I’m pointing out that Henry Makow peddles questionable data and questionnable guests. That’s all.

        There’s no need to believe in Illuminatis, or Bilderbergers, or any Secret Cabals who you can do nothing about; who you can’t even speak to! If you do end up believing they are in control of everything then you just end up dis-empowering yourself. You make the ELite into something like Franza Kafkas Castle: something that dominates your life but you can do nothing about it. That’s dis-empowering, emasculating, and we have enough emasculating going on already.

        Focus on the people that you can interact with and the things that you can have control over.

        LikeLike


      • on July 13, 2013 at 5:27 am Anonymous

        LOL, mother of fcuk this guy is a laugh!

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 9:11 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        yes anyone who points out the decline is a conspiracy theoristsz zlzozozl

        as there is no delinez! mens rights are increaisng and it is getting betetr as more and more failes are enduring and les shcildernedns ar ebeing aborted and the debt is decreasingz and chatrsver and hono are on the rise! lzozoz

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 9:10 am peterike

        Brother Nathanael is the man.

        LikeLike


  2. on July 8, 2013 at 1:36 pm embracingourfemininity

    Wow I can’t believe they were married.. he’s quite handsome.. and she looks much older than him.

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 1:51 pm everybodyhatesscott

      A dress, longer hair, and some hair dye and I can imagine her looking pretty for her age. So, she was probably decent looking at one point. Short hair easily knocks off a point and the grey hair knocks of another point. Of course, she probably cut her hair short during the marriage and he probably didn’t have the balls to tell her how terrible it looked.

      LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 1:55 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        yes, all she would need is

        a dress
        longer hair
        20 years younger
        braces
        nose job
        boobs
        tummy tuck
        facelift
        botox
        get rid of buck teeth
        get rid of grey hair

        and she would be an LA 7 or midwest 8
        with the very same
        SOUL OF SATAN!

        lzoozozozozozozozozo

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 2:36 pm Greg Eliot

        and she would be an LA 7 or midwest 8
        with the very same
        SOUL OF SATAN!

        Beyond The Valley Of The D(r)olls!

        Well-played, sir.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 2:38 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzolzozozozozoozozoz

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 2:39 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Nailed it, although your spelingz seems off

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 2:45 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozz yah i had misisplaced my riatalin addelrolzz precscitioopznz next 2 da magnum occnodmsz condomz and when she wnenet pack to get another two magnum cocnodmdmss for da gbfmz lsostas cockas she mussta kickcnofkedd em over bu thatnk god i founds dem bottelllz land now i feleel vbeteterlzlzozlz zlzozo

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 2:59 pm Nicole

        I would have married you if you’d been of age when I was a virgin. I’d just have a special closet where I kept my Vodun stuff, like any good Christian lady. 🙂

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 3:03 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        one time
        i dated a girlz
        who made me wiat and wait
        and wait and wait
        and wait to stick it in her punannzni
        and wiat and wait
        and wiat and wiat some more
        and finally
        she took me up
        let me up
        to her room
        and there
        beside her bed
        was a big bowl
        of condomz

        so da gbfm looksz at it and says
        “should i go on a condom run, cuase this isn’t gonna be enough.”

        and i walked out on da slut
        and never came back
        as da bitch had made da gbfm waitz
        and thusly did not desrve
        my lotsas cockaskxz zlzlzlzozz

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 7:36 pm Nicole

        Well, you waited. She’s only responsible for her half of that situation. 😉

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 7:39 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        a manaz manz gotta live and leanrz zlzlzlzo i gues slzozoz

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 8:46 pm whorefinder

        Next time resolve the situation the old-fashioned way: rape!

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 6:27 pm Nicole

        Live and learn indeed.

        Question though…How do you figure a woman who’s lived and learned should conduct herself in these situations? All the relationship gurus tell us to make them wait for whatever amount of time.

        Personally, I don’t think there’s anything we can do right because one can’t turn back time and unmarry or in some women’s cases just unshag the men. I’m not looking for a first husband though.

        Seriously, what should a deflowered woman do, in your opinion?

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:05 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        da gbfm is working on
        a reattachable hymen kit
        “good as new zlzlozozlzoz”

        LikeLike


      • on July 12, 2013 at 12:08 pm Nicole

        I was thinking something more along the lines of making one’s peace with being a slut (which is not the same thing as being proud of it, just accepting that one can’t turn back the time or unmake decisions one has made). This seems to work best for me. Whenever I try to do anything else, it just leads to needless heartbreak and frustration.

        Getting over the idea of a “normal” relationship is more difficult for other women than for me because they believe that they have that option because nobody really tells them otherwise. Things haven’t been “normal” for quite some time, and though some go too far being unmanly and dead inside, quite a few good guys still love themselves and rightfully opt out of trying to frame a mutually satisfying partnership between two experienced people as a conventional marriage.

        It’s hard to get across to them that nobody in their right mind would put a ring on it, and if it does happen this is luck, not what she “deserves”. So they have no gratitude.

        If you (or anyone else who wants to answer) could say anything to the women of the west, those who have slept around a lot, or those who made one or two mistakes in their youth, or those who are divorced for good reasons or widowed, or those who are divorced for stupid reasons, what would it be? Do you have different thoughts about different kinds of non virgins, or are they all the same to you? What exactly do you judge about a woman’s past, and is there something that would make a woman not only someone you wouldn’t marry, but wouldn’t even seek a commitment with?

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 3:10 pm chi-town

        She is trying to go dyke to enter the going to seed stage of her reproductive cycle. Looks like she is applying beta husband repellent thick as toe jam . If she were sneaking out at night with high heels and a wig, I would have to admit that would be the only thing between the two that could salvage any admiration I would have for either one of them.

        LikeLike


  3. on July 8, 2013 at 1:43 pm embracingourfemininity

    This is also a terrible arrangement, think about the effect it’s going to have on the children, they will be wondering why their parents are not sleeping in the same bed. Extremely unhealthy. But how much can he dislike this if he is not being a man and putting his foot down to stop this madness?

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 2:26 pm Man Reader

      The state/slaveowners/Fed won’t let him put his foot down. It’s called “no fault” divorce. Read GBFM’s post again, more carefully this time.

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 4:54 pm wdodman

      He built that house to boot!

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 5:28 pm V

      and they still call it “putting the children first” lol

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 8:47 pm whorefinder

      Is even even sure they’re his?

      He should get them genetically tested. Odds are BOTH are not his.

      And he’d stick around anyway, being the beta bitch that he is.

      Sad rape.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:06 pm Matthew

        “Sad rape” needs a meme photo.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:03 pm Lucius Somesuch

        Why is this girl child wearing a black negligee around the house and vamping for the camera with that smug grin? And is the thing behind her a boy or a girl?

        Good God, and this receding horror house vista of white open doors upon halls upon doors upon halls– it’s archetypally creepy.

        “Come desoul with us, Danny. Forever . . . and ever . . . and ever . . .”

        LikeLike


      • on July 11, 2013 at 6:28 am Wolfie65

        Probably his. The woman’s like 10-15 years his senior by the looks of it and doesn’t have the goods for effective cheating. Not many guys out there into grey-haired dykes.
        Either way, he’s not doing a good parenting job or the girls wouldn’t already be shapeless blobs at age 10. Poor sap probably feels that he has to buy his daughters’ love, and the best way he can think of doing that is shuttling them back and forth between Burger King, Shoe-La-Palooza and CinnaBon.

        LikeLike


  4. on July 8, 2013 at 1:43 pm Beta Of The Month: The Divorce House | Viva La Manosphere!

    […] heartiste.wordpress.com […]

    LikeLike


  5. on July 8, 2013 at 1:45 pm Lara

    She’s just trying to get out of sex with him.

    [CH: That’s right, and that’s what marks him with the betaboy stigmata.]

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 1:53 pm Maldek

      Thats exactly what I would consider if the day comes that I no longer want to have sex with my wife. Difference is that I am a man.

      If we put is lesser-beta-is-branded-in-my-skin-looks aside, he does not seem to have better options. Maybe his ex-wife does not allow him sex in the house (or at all)? It wouldnt surprise me….

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 4:34 pm Subway Masturbator

      Getting out of sex with that leering cartoon character is not exactly punishment.

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 6:53 pm monster221

      beta isnt even the word for this guy. beta is just a normal every day weakling. this guy is a miserable shell of a man, placating to his hideous lesbian wife with no benefit for him. his wife is using his emotional attachment to his children to not only deny him sex with her but to neuter him and deny him sex with anybody else. and allows it because he doesnt see any value in himself.

      he probably cries himself to sleep and jacks off in a puddle of tears.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:31 am Kate

        That’s right. Look, you can’t have it both ways. This is what I consider a mockery of divorce. If you are still able to live in the same house, why can’t you work out the issues? She wants everything he has to offer her except sex. Well, that isn’t fair. If she wants to be divorced, that means he gets to have a life of his own and that includes sex with other people. This is not really for the children. This is about as selfish a thing as can be conceived on the woman’s part.

        Now my ex and I live close but we do not share anything about our personal lives unless it is going to affect our daughter. Though I have been involved with some people and I assume he has too, it appears we are both moving at the same rate. Usually the men move on/remarry faster than the women. Its like six years to nine years or something like that. I have a friend who has had to contend with her ex having a girlfriend who has become involved with her kids while she hadn’t introduced them to anyone yet.

        Children will abandon the single parent in favor of the one who presents the more fulfilled family model. They prefer a joint two parent system whether they are the biological ones or not.

        Bottom line: this dude is getting screwed. He might be doing it for the children, but she isn’t. She’s putting herself first. He sense its unfair but she doesn’t because they probably haven’t been having sex for years.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 9:03 pm drunicusrex

        Yes, it’s hideous, but women loathe fucking betas. Vows don’t mean much when the tingled are dead.
        If he got really jacked, bought a motorcycle, and started screwing 25 year old hotties (doable, with a bit of work and “alpha” self-improvement) she suddenly might stop seeing him as an.unattractive loser, and suddenly might start wanting to screw him again.
        though if he’s happy with a hotter, lighter, tighter harem, he likely won’t want to go back to ground chuck, after a warrior’s feast of filet mignonette.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:38 am Kate

        Denying him the ability to move forward with his life without her is what is unfair in this situation. This makes a mockery of divorce. If they can live together in the same house, why can’t they stay married? She wants everything he can provide except sex and that is not right. If she doesn’t want to be married, she has to let him find someone else to fill that need. He senses how wrong it is; she seem oblivious because she’s probably been withholding sex for years.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:39 am Matthew King

        Righteous. Betas are shat upon too much by definition here. The betas in a wolf pack are simply alphas-in-waiting, ready to seize the throne when weakness presents itself.

        Omegas are runts, not even part of a pack dynamic, not able to perform in a leadership capacity, much less capture it for himself. More often than not when someone says “beta” in these parts they really mean omega.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:07 pm Matthew

        Betas are the dudes on the wrong end of the barrel of the gun.

        LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 1:07 am cynthia

      Sure, but why do we even need pretense like this anymore? Why not stay married and fuck other people? Probably better for everyone’s emotional health in the long run.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 1:15 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        now that womenz have equal righztz
        why don’t they just get tehir own homez
        and pay all der own billz
        and now and den when dey want to fuckz
        and if tehy’re hot still shot
        dey can have da gbfm over
        to sataistate their gina tinglelzozl
        and king a over to satsiataizee tehir butt tingzlozlo?
        lzozoozozo

        LikeLike


  6. on July 8, 2013 at 1:46 pm RappaccinisDaughter

    Devil’s Advocate/Thought Experiment: How beta is this, really?

    1. Unlike most divorcerapes, he still has easy and constant access to his children. She can “lock the door” during her custody week, but he can see who comes and goes; the kids can come knock on his door any time they want. If Mommy’s new Flavor of the Month is making them uncomfortable, he’s right there.

    2. While we’re on the subject of Flavor of the Month, if she does something really out-of-line like try to move some ex-con in*, or even just to start splitting bills with a new boyfriend while still bleeding him for alimony…he’s right there to collect all the evidence he needs for further court action.

    3. Unlike most divorcerapes, even if he IS paying for the house…at least he gets to stay in it. I can’t tell you how many divorced guys I know of who are supporting their fat-ass stay-at-home ex-wives * who are still living in the house HE’s paying the mortgage on, plus child support, plus alimony, meaning that he has to go live in a tiny studio apartment or a single-wide trailer.

    *I know a guy this happened to. Ex-con new boyfriend was beating on his kids and it took AGES for him to get custody back…and even after he did, it took several more months for his child support payments to get canceled!

    **For the record, despite being a ballbusting career woman myself, I do not have a problem with women who choose to stay at home with their kids. However, the above-listed cases were all women who were the mothers of school-age children who could *easily* have sought part-time employment to help defray the costs of raising the children, rather than forcing their husbands to live in poverty.

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 1:59 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      1. Why the FUCK would you want access to CHILDREN just so they can be shwon your severed BALLS?

      2. WHY THE FUCK WOULD I WANT TO WORRY ABOUT COLECTING EVEIDNENDCES FOR COURT ACTIONZ when I could siply be banging younger hotter tighter girls twnety pounds lighter?

      3. WHY THE FUCK WOULD I WANT TO “STAY” IN A HOUSE WITH A BUTT UGLY BUCK TOOTHED GREY SPINSTER SATAN SOULLESS LADY AND TEAHC MY SON THAT I AM A DEBALLEDE BUTCOKED BALLELLSLSZ MANZ?

      and so we see da difefrnence bettweenz WOMENZ
      and da
      GREAT BOOKZ FOR MENZ Zzozozozolzol

      LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 2:07 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Some guys do really care about continuing to have access to their kids post-divorce. It seems to be one of the pre-eminent issues in the MRA movement…and when I see so-called “feminists” opposing it, that’s our biggest clue that they’re morally bankrupt hypocrites.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 2:12 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        WHAT THE FUCK
        IS THE USE OF HAVING
        ACCESS TO YOUR KIDS
        WHEN YOU ARE BEING USED
        TO TEACH THEM
        THAT MEN MUST
        AND WILL
        HAVE THEIR BALLS
        CUT OFF?!?!?!?!

        and so we see, men, the moral depravity
        unconsciousness unconcsciousness
        and general soullessesness of owmenz womenz
        in the form of RappaccinisDaughter
        lzozozozozo

        Hamlet noted this
        as did Telemacuhus and Homer
        and the writeres of GENENSIS and da BIBLE
        which is why the fed
        had to deocnstrcuctd and destory da GRETA BOOKS FOR MENZ lozozozo
        so as to rule
        da world
        with iron butthext
        lzoozozozoz

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:54 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Yes, that’s right, I’m soulless. By the way, who the hell narced the Professional Womenz Ode to you? That was supposed to be a secret. That, and the yearly meetings we have at the Bilderberg Hotel to get our marching orders from Ben Bernanke and Tucker Max. And let me tell you, that Butthexing Ritual is a right bitch.

        But if it makes you feel any better, this year I had a giant take-out of Indian food right beforehand, so I don’t think Master Bernanke and Monsieur Max enjoyed it any more than I did.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 7:22 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Yes, it’s true, you’ve put your finger right on it. I have no soul.

        What I want to know is, who narced out the lyrics to the Professionalzz Womenzz Ode to you? Because that was supposed to be a secret.

        That, and the yearly meetings we have at the Bilderberg Hotel to get our marching orders from Ben Bernanke and Tucker Max. Boy, is that a literal pain in the ass. I mean, first we have to sing the Ode, all together, and take it from me: all those extra s’s and z’s are hell to enunciate. (Personally, I usually just lip-synch through all the “butthexts,” because I don’t know how that’s properly pronounced.)

        THEN we all have to get in line for the Butthexting Ritual, which is a stone bitch. First off, I know for a FACT that Bernanke only changes the condom every third girl. Second, there are a lot of us so it takes forrrrreeevvvvveeerrr. Thirdly, two at once? Ouch.

        But if it makes you feel any better, GBFM, this year I ate a giant plate of Indian food right beforehand, so I don’t think they enjoyed it any more than I did.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 8:03 am Divorced Dad

        While this is funny, the sad thing is that actually the stuff GBFM says is, well, ***TRUE***. Only a no-fault divorced father can truly understand it. I am involuntarily teaching my children this right now. They know that I was not in favor of the divorce, know that I have no power, know that I still cry because of missing them and worrying about them, know that my ex wife did this supposedly “for them” because this (divorce) is better than them seeing the ex and I fight (because she didn’t take her marriage vows or the Bible seriously when it said for her to cherish, “obey,” and honor me. And before you go all psycho, there was nothing for her to “obey” no I was not some weird BDSM weirdo…by “obey” it’s more just understand that you have to respect “the marriage” and life is not perfect…no reason to divorce just because things get a little boring. THat’s life. BUt anyway GBFM is actually right. He’s not claiming a regular nobody girl like you goes to the bilderberg meetings to get buthexxed. He is correct that THE LAW OF THE LAND and the corporations are TEACHING women not only to not respect men, but to downright despise and laugh at and ridicule them. No fault divorce and custody laws are part of it. And alimony. If a woman cannot support herself financially, then she should have no right to “no fault” divorce. Period. That’s the way it’s been in all human societies for 10,000 years until the 1970s in the United States.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 10:58 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Well, DivorcedDad, I’m guessing you’ve read some of the above comments I’ve made and so it won’t be a surprise to you that I agree that the current divorce laws are essentially misandrist and do not reflect the economic reality of our times. However, we can agree on those items and then do what we can to get the laws adjusted so that the sexes are treated equally under the eyes of the law…which is, after all, what the original goal of feminism was…without resorting to insane conspiracy theories that somehow center on Tucker Max and the Fed.

        (As schizo-confusing as that is, I’m even more puzzled as to how anal sex factors into the equation. Does he think the soul gets pulled out afterward, like Jack Horner and the plum?)

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 11:39 am Divorced Dad

        @rappaccini. yes. thank you. I agree.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 10:11 pm tacomaster

        @divorced dad,
        let me personally tell you from the perspective of a child of a divorced family, you are doing a good thing by explaining the situation to your children and being upfront with them. My mother brainwashed my brother and me when we were young and made it out to be all my dads fault. He was pretty beta and never spoke ill will against her and let her get with a lot of crap. We found out a lot of things from family members and friends which helped clarify what really occurred. So ya, your kids might not understand now but they’ll appreciate it later when they’re older.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 9:05 pm Matthew

        It became necessary to abandon my children in order to save them.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 5:29 am Ron

        That is the most heartbreaking thing I ever heard.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:10 pm Matthew

        That’s because it’s not true. The right way to save your children from a woman is to kill exactly as many people as necessary to escape.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 4:06 pm Anonymous

        An man does his best to protect his kids, regardless of his ex, etc….

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 4:14 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        when your wife
        has cut your balls off
        and your son has seen this
        how the fuck are you protecting your son
        by displaying your balless scrotum sack
        empty sack
        every day?

        “let the dead bury the dead” christ preached

        a man honors Christ, not the dead.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:11 pm Matthew

        Men also increase the number of dead, when appropriate.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 11:43 pm Tom

        They also save lives – at the cost of their own.
        Even when it’s NOT appropriate.

        For every one Hitler, there were 20 million GOOD men who faught and died to defeat that son-of-a-single-mother. But nobody ever talks about that. They ignore 9.999% of men and only care to mention that dude who opened fire in a movie theatre. Not the the pathetic betas who took a bullet to save their girlfriends for no goddam reason. There are more of THEM. But don’t worry. We’re working on fixing that.

        Look up , grasshopper. Not down.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 10:35 am feministx

        Yeah, they really do. I generally don’t give men much credit in general for inner goodness, but that one has to grant. The vast majority of men descended from k selected population groups will put up with freaking anything- the most shrewish/fat/ugly/ill tempered woman, the most boring and soul crushing of jobs etc all to be there for their kids and provide for them.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 1:23 pm Man

        And after the divorce he will pay, oh, I don’t know, $4,000 a month to a woman who has not worked since 2004 to make sure the kids are still provided for.

        LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 2:03 pm Lara

      Financially, it does make sense for him. However, I’ll going to bet on the fact that he isn’t allowed to bring in any women who aren’t approved by her.

      LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 2:23 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        No.

        Getting married to slutwhores makes NO FINANCIAL SENSE.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 12:27 pm Anonymous

        This one isn’t any good at bernankifying his assets either. A real Western woman would have had him liquidated in kangaroo divorce court in exchange for a fresh supply of fiat debt a long time ago lolzozlzolzozlz

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 1:08 am cynthia

        By that same token, it must be harder for her to bring in a guy who’s going to molest the kids, right?

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 5:47 am Lara

        True. With her hair style, I wonder if she is even trying to attract anyone. She could be a target, for a man with ulterior motives.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:08 am cynthia

        She’ll probably end up like every 35 year-old-plus lesbian I know; finding out at some point that all those times she enjoyed having an actual penis in her vagina was nothing more than societal pressure and self-deception, and she’s really been attracted to other fat, aging, dumpy, vulgar women all along. And then the dysfunction already present in that house will rise by an order of magnitude. It’s sad, no matter how you slice it.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 10:32 am Canadian Friend

        I’m glad what you said is sarcasm

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 2:43 pm cynthia

        @Canadianfriend

        I’m not being sarcastic. Well, maybe I wording, not in content. Ask ANY lesbian of that age who was previously married (hint: 95% of them) and she’ll give you that answer. And it fucks the kids up big time to know that mommy never really loved daddy, she was just living in self-denial.

        LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 2:09 pm Matthew King

      My contrarianism for contrarian’s sake is rubbing off on you. Good. All solid discourses require a loyal opposition.

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 2:40 pm feministx

      I agree. How can this be beta of the month when your standard divorced dad gets a worse deal than this? Plus, we don’t actually have evidence that the worst case scenario is actually happening. We don’t know that he is footing the whole bill for this or that she is dating a string of alphas while he suffers in silence. She’s a short haired middle aged single mother. She might not even be dating at all.

      LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 3:19 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Because you sometimes just gotta take the heat and move on.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 9:06 pm Matthew

        It’s because he consented, barrens.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:12 am feministx

        Barrens? I liked thicky thicky hindu better. I bequeath barrens to rapsdaughter.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:14 pm Matthew

        Base assumption: all women commenting here merit the name until shown otherwise. Exemption shall be granted upon personal proof of concept.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 1:07 pm feministx

        Just noticed that you are a different person than matt k.

        Matts are like asians to me. All look same.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:20 pm Greg Eliot

        I imagine mattresses are all the same to you as well. llozozlzlzozlzlzlzl

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:53 pm feministx

        Alas, I cannot discern between king sized mattresses and nondescript mattresses.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:14 pm Matthew

        My avatar has a pig.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 11:46 am feministx

        That and your screen name is not the same at all as Matthew King’s, so…

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 9:15 pm Matthew

        I wasn’t sure if you could read.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 12:15 pm Matthew King

        How. Dare. You.

        Luckily Matthew sans cognomen is a chill bro that I’d totes hang with. I’m thinking he is uh resurrected and transfigured.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 9:17 pm Matthew

        Nope, but I take that as an unmerited compliment.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 3:17 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Yeah, I’m the barren one. You can tell us apart because her avatar looks like a headless Salma Hayek and mine looks like a Space Invader.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:49 pm Hugh G. Rection

        I always imagined it to be an upside down uterus.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 7:16 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Genius, and I mean that sincerely.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:55 pm feministx

        lol

        LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 3:06 pm Southern Man

      Agree. I would have rather had a deal like this than what I do, which is send a huge check to the ex once a month and see the kids every other weekend. No alimony, no child support, 50/50 custody…and MY side of the house would be a hell of a lot more fun for the kids than hers.

      LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 3:19 pm Kate

        At the moment they are both single. What happens if that changes? Granted, the divided house is not going to exactly lure in potential relationships. However, should she ever meet someone who really rings her chimes, she will not be able to get away fast enough. And what happens when he meets someone and the kids have more fun on his side and don’t even want to go over to her side anymore since she’s just by herself. Its a temporary solution till they come to grips with what they’re doing, in my opinion. Hopefully the house will be easy to sell or rent as a duplex in the future. I do not see this lasting unless both of them are so undesirable that neither of them find another spouse and they eventually get back together at some point. Or continue to live on either side of their wall until death do them part.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 6:10 pm Born Again Alpha

        She has zero prospects. There is a large pool of guys who will date her for sex and almost no one who will commit to her in any meaningful way.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 6:43 pm Kate

        Why would anyone want to get involved in this weird situation for that hair?

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 2:11 pm Glengarry

        Indeed, though I give your last two sentences a 0% shot.

        (It seems pretty clear that dear wifey drove the divorce too.)

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 2:34 pm Kate

        Yes (waiting for my other comments to post).

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:52 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Imagine banging a broad with her ex-husband in the other half of the house. It’s kinda like when she’s still living with her parents, the kink factor really has to compensate for the awkwardness.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 6:41 pm Kate

        Its gross. Its completely repellent. He’s a cuckold. I don’t care if they have a divorce decree. That’s still what she would be doing to him.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 11:46 pm Tom

        What’s utter SICK is the longer he “cohabitates” with her…. the more the courts will turn is @ss from this (__x__) to THIS (__((O))__) when she decides to collect lifetime vaginamony.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 12:17 pm Matthew King

        Ahahahahaha. I love the drawings. Definitely will use.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:34 pm Eric S. Mueller

        I remember once going on a couple of dates with a girl who lived with two big dogs and her ex-fiance. In a small 2 bedroom apartment. It was too awkward for me.

        LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 3:41 pm not_PC

      Not much different than saying that in prison one guy got raped 10 times last week and another got raped “only” 6 times… yay?

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 5:40 pm Catalyst

      I agree in theory. The problem here isn’t the idea of living under one roof “for the kids” – it’s the execution. Let’s assume this guy was slightly more Alpha, and we might spin this living situation a bit differently:

      1) He owns the house outright, and is renting a room to his ex-wife because he chooses to be an Alpha Dad.

      2) He’s bringing home a steady stream of fresh girlfriends, but she doesn’t say anything about it, because she still wants him too.

      Actually doesn’t sound like a terrible situation, does it? However, the guy in the article isn’t living it.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 9:10 pm meh

        How is he going to own the house outright, skippy. The judge divides assetts in HALF, usually more than half. The ONLY way he could have done that is to have the house in a NON-DISCRETIONARY TRUST with lots of assets to pay the mortgage/taxes in perpetuity. Then Mechanics Bank would own the house, and you’d have no say in the matter in how the trust gets spent. That’s the NON in the discretionary part. That is the only way to separate the asset from a divorce lawyer. If you get to tell the trust how the money gets spent per month, it’s a dividable asset since you exercise control over it. You better hope the trust has enough assets to run it for awhile, if the court sees the trust might dissolve soon due to lack of funds, and it’s within your ex’s lifetime that it might dissolve, the court might consider it attachable.

        CAPICHE?

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 9:12 pm meh

        P.S. The trust would have to be created BEFORE meeting the woman, or you are guilty of planning ahead to deprive her of assets, and the trust becomes attachable.

        LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 8:24 am red texas

      If you go through a divorce with kids there is a parenting class that is typically required by the family court. One of the classes teaches that the scenario in this article is the best thing for the kids. The guy is simply doing what he thinks os best for the kids. Obviously the look on his face shows he is not thrilled with life but he has done what he thought was best for the kids. There are lots of selfless men out there and as a result they dont fight back if they can be convinced they are sacrificing themselves for a greater good. This is a fundamental difference I have noticed between men and the women I have witnessed through life.

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 2:23 pm mvetsel

      Exactly right. When it comes to fatherhood, CH’s normally astute posts (and his commenters) start to sound like teenage virgins discussing their favorite sexual positions.

      I’m not going to be able to explain the benefits of fatherhood to this crowd or why chasing tail gets old, but maybe I can describe in CH terms why these middle-aged women are mostly hurting themselves (and their kids) when they decide to get divorced.

      When a middle to upper-middle class 40 year-old couple gets divorced, it’s the man who has higher sexual market value. That guy in the photo may need to hit the gym a bit, buy some clothes and find some new hobbies, but he’ll do fine. He’ll have more TIME to spend pursuing women, he’ll land some fresh younger ass, and he’ll have no problem finding a girlfriend with long-term potential, if he wants.

      The gray-haired she-beast might be able to force a smile now, but that’s because she probably has no clue that she has roughly zero years of serious relationship value and about 5 years of pump and dump left with losers who will disappear once the memory of naked folds loose flapping flesh outweighs their extreme horniness. The hard stats show that 10 years from the odds are 5 to 1 that she’ll be a bitter 50-something harpy that no man will ever give her a second look while he’ll be remarried.

      It’s all about the divergence of SMV curves. That’s why traditional marriage penalized men so heavily for exiting. Now feminists have filled women’s head with so much excrement that women no longer understand the basic aspects of biological reality that their own grandmothers understood with almost instinctive certainty.

      -MV

      LikeLike


  7. on July 8, 2013 at 1:52 pm Adonis

    Wow!!!

    LikeLike


  8. on July 8, 2013 at 1:52 pm Remo

    “how much can he dislike this if he is not being a man and putting his foot down to stop this madness?”

    What are his options and avenues for success? Lets see if he does demand to move back in she’ll call the police and have him removed from the entire house and a judge will back her up on this. He’ll still pay for everything of course. Serious question for those with a straight who marvel at men not “putting their foot down”… how do you propose to first violently resist the police then, violently overthrow the entire government (which will be necessary) to thus allow him or any other man to “put his food down” successfully? Men have no legal recognized authority and any attempt by any man do enforce anything on a woman is severely punished. Why is this always ignored in discussions like this? Game is not effective against guns.

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 6:42 pm Glen

      “Men have no legal recognized authority and any attempt by any man do enforce anything on a woman is severely punished.”

      The only “authority” one needs is the balls to carry out the Samson option.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 9:19 pm meh

        You and the other idiot that are recommending violence need to have your head examined. But since you mentioned the Samson Option, which is the backup Yid plan of ‘If we can’t have Israel, then you can’t have the rest of the world’, perhaps you Yids can get away with killing, since you own the courts.

        LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 10:41 am Northman

      Bring them into our frame.

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 2:09 pm John

      unless you’re a n!gger – then society grants you a free pass to be as violent, antisocial, and hyper-masculine as you want, with very minimal repercussions as long as you don’t spill out onto the town square with it.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:47 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Yeah, that’s why there’s no black people in prison.

        LikeLike


  9. on July 8, 2013 at 1:57 pm Mitch Cumstein

    The Canadians: so damn polite. Not only will they give you the shirt off their backs, but their ex-wives a place to fuck new stepfather candidates. B-eh-ta of the month.

    LikeLike


  10. on July 8, 2013 at 2:03 pm JayMan

    “Is it really good for the children to see their father so pathetically emasculated on a daily basis?”

    It’s probably not bad for the children, either. Actually, it almost certainly doesn’t matter at all.

    LikeLike


  11. on July 8, 2013 at 2:06 pm Matthew King

    They’re Canadian. Next.

    LikeLike


  12. on July 8, 2013 at 2:16 pm cryo

    How much you want to bet this guy is harboring some misguided hope that he will one day reconcile with his ex-wife? I can see it in his eyes, that sad glint of emotional obliteration that keeps him hanging around for table scraps of attention. I can’t award this man Beta of the Month, he’s really just a variation of your common hapless divorcee.

    What he should do: learn Game, step up as a father, and start bringing young trim to his self-imposed house of horrors, preferably in plain view of his geriatric ex.

    LikeLike


  13. on July 8, 2013 at 2:20 pm LionSoul

    Lol. That guy got moobs. Ironic.

    LikeLike


  14. on July 8, 2013 at 2:23 pm Kate

    Oh good Lord.
    Cut the Cord.

    This couple is in denial. Living in the same neighborhood is close enough, believe me. It appears this couple is not really divorced. They seem to have a sexless, adulterous marriage.

    LikeLike


  15. on July 8, 2013 at 2:26 pm Us

    The kids are obese, of course.

    LikeLike


  16. on July 8, 2013 at 2:39 pm Bardon

    There is something sick about it. You can rationalize the financial & other aspects, but still…..The ex-husband should move on to Antarctica, at least.

    LikeLike


  17. on July 8, 2013 at 2:44 pm ng85

    I have to say that if I was those kids I’d love it. My parents divorced when I was younger and I hated being carted around to see different parents at different parts of the week and having no say in it. All my friends thought it was cool that I technically lived in 2 different houses, but I just wanted 1, ideally with both parents.

    But if I was that father I’d be miserable. Yes, he gets 50/50 custody of his children, which many fathers would love to have. But I can’t imagine having to, I assume, interact in some way with the cunt who left me every day. There’s only a wall separating them and you’re bound to bump into one another all the fucking time. I also guarantee that the wife calls on him constantly to come over and fix shit for her, but never reciprocates favors.

    LikeLike


  18. on July 8, 2013 at 2:45 pm 732

    Its what happens when marriage is based on feels and not duty. Love is duty. And O how fickle are the feels of the woman. A nuclear family led by feels is destined to destruction, like a ship upon the rocks. And as goes the family so goes the nation.

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 4:17 pm Greg Eliot

      A house divided cannot stand…

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 4:57 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      the heart and soul of GAME: women are ruled primarily but butt and gina tinglelzlzlzo, while men are ruled by honor, integrity, and the exalted honor codes set down in THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MENZ zlzlzlzlzl

      lzozozozozozoozo

      women are governed chiefly by butt and gina tingelelzozlolzozzo

      GREAT MEN and thsose who penned da GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN were governemned by HEROIC CODES OF HONORz lzozozoz throughout history men have created CIVILIZATION and the insititution of MARRIAGE based on the MYTH of ONE MAN ONE WOMEN.

      asking why women flake is like asking like “why does it rain sometimes in da summerz?”

      as we live in a society which attacksz traditional codes of honor so as to transfer assettz form menz to womenz (aka the banker cartel elite who must conevrt tehir fiat worthless debt into physical goodz and peroperty), we live in a society governed more and more by butt and gina tinzizzglelzozo and less and less by da GRETA BOOKS FOR MENZ and the VIURTUOYS SOUL.

      this is how da eberenekfieieferz want it as they see WESTERN CIVILIZATION and MORALITY as an affront to their dishonorable quest to conevert qorthless book entries into power and physcial peorperteierzz lzozolzlzoz

      and so they deocnstructed THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MENZ

      and created a world rueld by BUTT AND GUINA TINEGELZOOZOZZ

      and to the degree gamers act so as to inspire BUTT AND GINA TINGELEOZOZLZOZ they too are ruled by BUTT AND GINA TINGELEZOZOZOZOZ but hey i undestertatsnd da need to dip da wick and get da pekcer wet, without losing ones’ life liveliehood, liberty, and happienenesz zlzlzlozoozozzoozo

      lzozoozozozozozo

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 5:00 pm dlulz

      Here it is. The core reason for the collapse of the family as a social institution. Male biological attraction is based on something simple and obvious: physical attractiveness and, to a much lesser degree (though perhaps it increases once children are involved) nurturing ability and femininity. Female attraction is driven by the most ridiculous thing imaginable: Feelings.

      No wonder women are totally insecure and even judge themselves to make no sense/be crazy. They are being authentic when they are attracted, it’s just that that attraction changes like the wind (unless you know how to provide a steady gust of emotions).

      So what’s happened to the institution of romance/love/marriage? What’s the advice women are given right from the get go? Follow Your Heart! A sure recipe for disaster.

      Love does not equal feelings. Love takes effort. If I love my kid I change his diapers whether I feel like it or not – because I love her. Nowadays however if she isn’t feeling it she is given full license to be totally irresponsible.

      Woe to the beta who provides her with stability and security – everything that makes sense for her – blessed is the guy who fucks with her heart and head constantly and keeps commitment always just barely out of reach.

      What’s not so obvious is how we can understand the feelings-attraction link in terms of evo-psych… to be clear I’m not doubting that biology can offer us an explanation here – I think it’s definitely the major factor in play – I just can’t figure out why feelings would be the primary indicator of attraction.. Women have a lot more white matter than men – almost double on average – maybe that has something to do with it.

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 11:05 pm Dave

      I sometimes think that you can’t truly feel without a sense of duty to begin with. The emotions of these women are so superficial. If you watch the old movies from the 40s and 50s deep love was a big theme. Now movies that are romantic are exclusively about passion but not affection on a deeper level.

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 3:15 pm embracingourfemininity

      So true.

      LikeLike


  19. on July 8, 2013 at 2:46 pm ab

    So who mows the lawn?

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 2:58 pm the latent sadist

      i lold. hard.

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 8:33 am Slang

      they partitioned it down the middle.

      LikeLike


  20. on July 8, 2013 at 2:48 pm Sad Clown

    Now that’s a photo chock-full of symbolism.

    LikeLike


  21. on July 8, 2013 at 2:48 pm The Bechtloff

    So I was on a Christian site I like to post on called Breakpoint and the topic of the decline of marriage came up. I brought up in the comments that until the family courts and their misandry are reformed marriage will continue to decline as a sensible man has no reason to enter it.

    Well needless to say the responses to my comment were less than favorable. The church loves to whine about marriage rates declining, they blame men for not “manning up” or blaming gay marriage when the reality is the divorce industrial complex is what’s destroying marriage. If even conservatives won’t face reality then we probably are at the event horizon.

    Here’s a link to that comment thread if anyone’s interested.

    http://www.breakpoint.org/bpcommentaries/entry/13/22618?spMailingID=6429549&spUserID=OTQ0MjMwMzc3S0&spJobID=76736979&spReportId=NzY3MzY5NzkS1

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 3:10 pm Hugh G. Rection

      It’s kind of funny how they keep bitching and moaning about declining marriage rates, yet fail to manage to make a convincing argument for marriage. People will be getting less religious, so even that angle loses it’s power.

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 3:20 pm corvinus

      You could point out to Gina that your “low opinion of women” comes from their initiating divorce most of the time.

      LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 3:43 pm The Bechtloff

        The funny thing is no one was really disputing my claims that marriage is risky for men or that men are treated like 2nd class citizens in the family courts but rather they were attacking me for daring to notice that fact and telling me to man up and just do it anyways.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 4:19 pm Greg Eliot

        Well DUH!

        Some of the Cathedral’s most useful, if unwitting, tools are stolid parishioners in churches they would HOPE are not infiltrated by he who disguises himself as an angel of light, when purpose serves.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 6:14 pm The Bechtloff

        It’s not surprising, but it is disappointing. There are far too many “blame men for everything” Bill Bennet style whiteknighters in the church.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 11:01 pm Dave

        Considering this I don’t think it should be too surprising that Christianity and traditionalism are declining in America. The fact that they’re unwilling to chastise women for immoral behavior and eager to condemn men indicates to me that there perhaps has been an undercurrent of gynocentrism within traditional American culture for some time. And that what we’re seeing now with feminism taking over is the logical consequence of that.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 12:13 am Hugh G. Rection

        It’s always funny to read these guys write “I’ve been married for 40 years”. That’s kinda the male equivalent to the women saying their own experience trumps legal facts and statistics. “Don’t get divorced”, “You just have to marry the right woman” are just as hollow phrases as “just be yourself” is.

        The only suggestion I read from those guys which was worth something was the one about the prenup. But I really wonder how you will convince your supposedly Christian wife of this (“Jesus wants us to have a prenup!”).

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 7:03 pm Troubadour

        They have a point that a man used to be able to beat his wife and throw her out, keeping the children. That’s because the feeling was since he was obligated to PAY for the children, he got to KEEP the children. Now the obligation to pay continues, but the right is long lost, while women continue to lose obligations and gain rights.

        As to the issue of women continuing to get married in spite of the above circumstances, I think that probably comes down to the fundamentally different future time orientation of the sexes. Women generally can’t see past the next paycheck or two, or maybe the next season.

        A woman planting a hedge: go buy a bunch of extremely expensive 3 gallon shrubs and plant them really close together. Over time, half the shrubs need to be culled to achieve the proper spacing, but you end up with a poor quality screen a lot sooner this way, at several times the price and at least three times the work.

        A man planting a hedge: go buy a bunch of extremely cheap baby shrubs and plant them some distance apart. In ten years, you have an extremely lush, thick, healthy wall of shrubbery. Nothing was wasted, least of all money. (I’m proud of that hedge. You can’t see my house from the street at all, and I spent like $15 on plants, instead of $15 PER plant.)

        Due to having a better sense of the big picture, we are much more risk averse when it comes to marriage; particularly now that there’s so much less social pressure on us to get married at all. I sure wouldn’t get married in today’s climate. It was bad enough 20 years ago, but now it’s totally ridiculous!

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 7:11 pm The Bechtloff

        More to the point, the fact that things were at one point unfair the other way does not excuse the injustices of today.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 11:41 pm corvinus

        Today is worse, because men have a far better inborn sense of justice than women do.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:20 pm Matthew

        When the Himalyan peasant …

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 7:46 pm Ben Gurion

        If you won’t volunteer, they will force you.

        LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 3:22 pm Will Powers

      Just keep spreading the word. White men buying into political correctness is what keeps the system propped up. Without white men police officers enforcing the law, white men prosecutors, and white men judges punishing other white men then we no longer have this loony system no matter what the actual law says. If we get a critical mass of white men informed, things will actually change for the better. Ideas are tools and weapons. We need to use our ideas to our advantage. No weapon formed against us shall prosper.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:31 pm Greg Eliot

        And the minute some cooze, even one near or on the wall, wiggles her finger (and her tush), the stalwart white man leaves his bro in the dust.

        THAT’S why we’re in the shape we’re in today.

        And this whole “for the good of the children” thing is another reason… when we stopped worshiping God and started worshiping children, the feet of clay started showing.

        The story of Abraham and Isaac has a lot more weight than even Christians realize.

        You can’t fight Satan effectively, as an individual or a nation, when you value your own heart and mind more than the will of God.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:58 pm The Bechtloff

        I’ve said over and over again that the modern church has made an idol of children. If you need any proof of that try imagining your a young married couple who tells their fellow church members or Bible studies members they’ve decided having kids isn’t for them. Just try to imagine the reaction they would get.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 6:16 pm Hugh G. Rection

        That’s also a SWPL thing. There is this great George Carlin bit from his last stand-up where he talks about it, he’s kind of a lefty in some regards but that thing really hit home. Parents who schedule and run their kids lives, hovering above them… Now of course it gets replaced with pets.

        The saddest thing I read from a married guy was how his marriage deteriorated to the point where his needs came after her dogs…

        Unhappy fathers don’t make for a good family.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:38 pm Eric S. Mueller

        I think the modern church socializes that stuff. When I was a fairly new believer, I was teaching a class on Wednesday, and was about to launch into one of those cliche teachings about how you’re supposed to have children. Then I looked right at a couple I knew was unable to have children, and realized I should keep my mouth shut about the topic. I never brought it up again.

        You are right about the idolatry of children in the church. I once tried to get a discussion going in a small group about whether people “worship” their children, but it didn’t go very far. I hit too many nerves.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:46 pm The Bechtloff

        Check out this breakpoint thread. It starts with an article in which John Stonestreet seems to all but say birth control, even non abortive birth control is a sin. I try to make the argument that some couples, even Godly couples may decide that having kids is not for them and that’s between them and God. I also make the point that this obsession with breeding on the part of Evangelicals is ironically Darwinian of them. It goes over as well as you might expect.

        http://www.breakpoint.org/bpcommentaries/entry/13/22333

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:40 pm Greg Eliot

        Make no mistake, I advocate having children as one of our purposes for walking the planet…

        But this constant “think of the children” kowtowing and making them the center of the universe is what becomes perverse… especially since it becomes a sort of moral high-horsemanship, as if its somehow more noble to cater to them than to do what is right, albeit unpopular and strict.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:53 pm The Bechtloff

        Usually when someone says “think of the children” it means I have to give up some freedom or right.

        I by no means am saying having kids is a bad thing, I just don’t think it’s inherently an obligation for everybody. Some people are not cut out to be parents.

        By the way, ever lose a friend to a kid? You know where they have a baby and right away by the way that kid has become the new absolute center of their universe you know you’re not hanging out with this person anymore. They will hardly ever have time and when they do you see they’re no longer that fun interesting person you knew.

        Sad,

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 9:12 pm Matthew

        Florence King, that forgivable misanthrope lesbian with a heart of gold, argued that the modern veneration of children is a substitute for the veneration of virginity.

        LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 4:46 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      hey betchloff

      if all the christiansz (churchiansz) read a couple of my poeemz, i do thiknz dat dey would see da prromebelesz and fix it!!

      da GBFM’s church defuneded my bible studey study greta books for men club cause they needed the moneyz to fund the “Repentant Sisterhood of the Sore Buttholez in Search of Beta Providers to Support Our Bastard Kidz” Bible study club zlozozozozo

      MANy OF you have realized by now dat da GBFM is a prinminet prominent CHRUCH LEADERZ LEDERZ ELDERZ CHRUCH CHRUCH HIGHER UP GRAND PUPAZ zozozzl zlozlzlzo!!!

      but i have bad newsz sad sad so very sad neewsz churchian church news

      my church defuneded my bible studey study greta books for men club cause they needed the moneyz to fund the “Repentant Sisterhood of the Sore Buttholez in Search of Beta Providers to Support Our Bastard Kidz” Bible study club zlozozozozo

      this is they’re hymnal hymenal hymnal no-hymen hymneell lzozozzoz:

      THE PRAYER OF THE REPENTANT SISTERHOOD OF DA SORE BUTTHOLEZ lzozoz

      ten alphas pumped and dumped me
      so i considred myself a ten
      told all the betas “let’s wait and see,”
      and now i am a single old dried up hen.
      empowered today with my haughty blogs
      calling on men to man up everywhere
      where cocks once penetratd my hole for logs
      jesus now forgives me via my prayer
      please jesus please heal my sore butthole
      i repent so send a beta provider my way
      a good manned-up man with a good soul
      the ones i ignored back in the day
      but now i desrve me a nice nice moneyed guy
      to pay for dates while i make him wait ’til i die.

      to make him pay for what i gave away for free
      back when i was younger hotter tighter
      no longer can he butthext the reformed me
      like they did when i was fifty pounds lighter.

      so please jesus please help da men man up everywhere
      to marry da jesus-healed butts of slutty slutts
      and pay to raise our bastard kidz it’s only fair
      dat betas we don’t lay gotta pay & never touch our holey butts
      jesus holy jesus you had better answer our sisterhood’s prayer
      or da sisterhood of da sore buttholzizoz gonna cut off ur nutts.

      lzozozozozoozozooz

      cluck clcukc cluck cluck clcuck
      clukc clcuclkuc lcuk clukck clcolzozlzozolzzoozzozlz

      hey dalrocklas lostsas cockas and heearteiztztets i think dat glen stanton is gonna put this in his hymnal bookz at all his mega churches/fort godz zlozlzozozoz

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 3:56 pm The Bechtloff

        “Repentant Sisterhood of the Sore Buttholez”

        LOL that should be the name of a all girl metal band. By all means GBFM you should post on there. In fact I would encourage any of the Christian men who read this blog, and I know there are more than a few, to make their way over to breakpoint and start posting. Gets lonely sometimes being the one voice of reason.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:23 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        zllzlzozzozo

        someiemez
        a man must stand alonez

        but when you walk through da valley
        of the darkness of butthext
        fear nor evilz
        for da gbfm is thy staff
        and da gbzfzn staff iz bizgz lottstsa bizgz zlzlzoozzlzo

        LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 4:49 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      hello betchcloff,

      could you pleas epost this poem there on that threadz?

      thakks!!

      extra extra large t-shrirtss 4 all da bernankakfied churchainz womenzz wedidng addition bridesmaiidszz lzlzozozozozo!!!

      i need to send dat fatass birdemadedz some t-shirts!!!!!!

      http://www.cafepress.com/greatbooksformen.582539775

      “da professional womenz ode”

      SPECIAL WEDDING EDITION

      alpha fucks and beta bucks
      dat is how we roll
      da butthexting cockass we fucks and sucks
      and in our anuthes it doth deosul
      alpha fucks and beta bucks
      it is da way of da fed
      to transfer assetss to dose who butthext
      cuckold dose who pay for our bread
      beta bucks and alpha fucks
      it’s what day teach us we;’re entitled too
      da assetts from betas we plucks
      after da alphas desol us through our hole for poo
      lzozozlzzolzlzlzlz

      SPECIAL EDITION WEDDING CHORUS lzozozozo

      i gave it 4 free when i was younger hotter tighter
      back in college when i was thirty pounds lighter
      can’t hardly wait to butthext yyou in divorce court
      and have you fund my favorite buttehxtual sport
      gonna buy sexy lingerie with all dat alimonee
      fuck & suck alpha cocks as ur beta cock is just 4 pee
      tee hee hee teee heee heee l
      tee hee hee teee heee heee !
      i’m da modern liberated womanz
      i buttehxt before and after marriage
      and during it too, but not with you
      but with the father of da baby in da carriage
      lzozozzlozoz

      cuckold da betas cockhold da alphas
      datsz what day taught us in mba grad school
      as da feiisnsits see no truth nor justice in their laws
      and say da great books for menz was all fools.
      yes, yes, i did very good on my gmats
      dey bernenakifed my soul away, left me with cats

      zlzlzzozozozo

      zlzoozozozozo

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 5:23 pm Reggie

      I like what you wrote there but you were kind with likening it to not being allowed to use seatbelts. I like the analogy that it’s like riding on the roof of the car and your wife is driving. She has seatbelts, airbags and crumple zones and you are at the mercy of her will. Even if she’s the kindest, best wife in the world, it’s still a shitty deal.

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 1:11 am cynthia

      The problem with most American Christians is that they see “but religion!” as an argument unto itself, and don’t understand that the reality-logic of human nature (of which there is actually much in Christianity) has to come into it at some point, or they’re going to lose.

      LikeLike


  22. on July 8, 2013 at 2:49 pm colonelcrimson

    Speaking of beta, here’s a link to some posters for a Missoula campaign to “end sexual violence” you might like, Heartiste. And by like, I mean “feel like wretching.”

    http://www.upworthy.com/6-overused-creepy-sentences-that-i-wish-always-had-these-surprise-endings?c=fea

    LikeLike


  23. on July 8, 2013 at 2:56 pm bhodi1555

    So basically it’s a sexless marriage

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 4:35 pm Greg Eliot

      Probably dinner-less and laundry-less as well… unless he’s doing the cooking and cleaning. lulz

      LikeLike


  24. on July 8, 2013 at 3:02 pm Dan Fletcher

    Re: 101M Americans Get Food Aid from Federal Gov’t tweet

    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet, and say to us, “Make us your slaves, but feed us.”

    LikeLike


  25. on July 8, 2013 at 3:04 pm the latent sadist

    man the other photo is WAY more telling of this situation. Worth a thousand words. Theyre all smiling, he stands there like a total; shmuck. I cant link to it though check it out on the link CH gave.

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 3:20 pm RappaccinisDaughter

      Not necessarily. This is a news story…well, a “lite, infotainment” news story, but close enough for government work. That means they sent a photographer out there, who no doubt took dozens of photos.

      It’s so easy to catch somebody’s expression in a random moment that will tell whatever story you want. I just got sent a bunch of pics from a vacation and there’s one where it looks like I’m storming out onto the porch in a rage while everybody else stands outside, laughing. If you had to write a caption for it, it would say, “RD is super pissed about being left out of the fun!” Nope: I was in a great mood, but I was walking into a bright light, which always makes me sneeze and the shutter snapped in mid-Sneezeface.

      These photos were *deliberately chosen* by the editorial team out of what I can almost promise you was a photo package that included posed shots of the family all smiling together. The question is, why? What story are they trying to tell? What do you they want you to believe?

      LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 4:26 pm Greg Eliot

        Why, soil my lace handkerchief… are you saying that the MSM are in the habit of practicing subliminal psyops?

        I’m shocked… shocked to learn!

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 4:53 pm Matthew King

        RD’s contrarianism handles my light work. Quick, give something a +1 so they know you’re not my sock puppet.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 5:03 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        …Matt, you made a sock puppet of *me* while I was sitting on a mountain in the middle of nowhere, with no cell service (let alone Wi-Fi). See, I was too busy worrying about the whether both the mountain lion whose fresh tracks I’d found 20 yards outside my cabin one morning—as well as the large-ish bear whose fresh tracks I’d found leading up to the damn porch earlier in the week—really were going to be attracted by my period or not, to even wonder about what CH might be up to.

        At this point, darling heart, I think it’s a bit much to ask me to clean up your messes.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:54 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Well, given that you already made a sock puppet of me, Matt, I think it’s a bit much for you to ask me to clean up your mess.

        Besides, I’m not being contrary for the sake of being contrary. Personally, I believe this article (and the photos that accompany it) was meant to deliver a much different message than the one CH took away from it. Look again at the image: She’s smiling directly into the camera with an open expression and a slightly coquettish head-tilt. But behind her…emerging from a a darkened room…he looms. His expression (again, probably caught before he was told to smile) doesn’t look so much miserable as it does broodingly angry.

        I mean, really, the way they’ve framed that photo, it looks like he’s stalking her.

        And they make sure to include this quote: “The emotional side of things…” says Mr. Kirkland. “As Monica put it, there are still feelings and not all of them positive feelings.”

        I think what the subtext of this piece was meant to convey was, “Look at this disgusting man who has somehow cozened his poor innocent wife into never ever leaving him. Look how even now he controls her, using the children as the chains in her prison. Look how he’s driven off all of her suitors. This is what you get, women, if you try to put the kids first!”

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:34 am Matthew King

        You remind me of me. You are freaky observant, sharp analyst, and a born writer.

        How was your high school experience? I would have been a nerd if I didn’t have older brothers.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 3:36 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Huh, I double-posted. When the first one disappeared, I figured WordPress had eaten it…guess I was in moderation instead.

        To answer your question: I was a nerd. Bookish, introverted, shy, and socially inept to the point that I was probably lucky to have escaped some trendy Asperger’s-type diagnosis. It didn’t help that I was one of those people who have to grow into their face, or that I had about 10 lbs of baby fat that didn’t come off until I went away to college. I had a small in-group of fellow nerdlings with whom I was very close, and I did date—but never anybody from my school. They were all significantly older men…enough so that the relationships were no doubt technically illegal.

        This, by the way, is why I tend to turn a hairy eyeball on the wording of some of the statutory RAPE laws. I know for a fact the 24-year-old I dated when I was 16 didn’t take advantage of me or hurt me in any way. (Well, OK, he did eventually break my heart, but that’s not against the law, nor should it be…)

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 12:20 pm Matthew King

        I’m smitten. I’m pretty sure we should fuck.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 12:44 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        Sweet burn, dude.

        LikeLike


      • on July 11, 2013 at 9:08 am Matthew King

        It’s not a burn. You are literally smart as fuck.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 12:27 pm the latent sadist

        fair enough. regardless….that is one morose photo, and if intended to portay a contrast…did a bang up job.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 3:39 pm embracingourfemininity

        Rappacini’s daughter.. I was also a nerd. But not a clever nerd. Just introverted, I never had boyfriend. And when

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 3:39 pm embracingourfemininity

        and when I got to age 15 the girls started to call me lesbian because I didn’t have boyfriends. Oh well.. now most of them are single mothers bless them

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 3:41 pm embracingourfemininity

        “or that I had about 10 lbs of baby fat that didn’t come off until I went away to college” LOL I was the same. but it came off at 16

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 3:54 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        “and when I got to age 15 the girls started to call me lesbian because I didn’t have boyfriends.”

        Living well is the best revenge, is it not?

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 3:56 pm embracingourfemininity

        Yep.. it definitively is. I bet those girls now wished they had saved themselves for one man.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 5:32 pm Hugh G. Rection

        You two still sound hurt to this day. That shit stays with you…

        LikeLike


  26. on July 8, 2013 at 3:06 pm Nicole

    My second husband and I have a similar arrangement, but he is not lacking for the kind of action he likes at all. I would feel bad for this guy, but only if he really was blind to her ways because she hid them well.

    Also, the kids should always have free access to all of the home except either of their bedrooms when occupied. The kids shouldn’t meet either of their sex partners unless or until they are serious.

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 3:20 pm Uncle

      lzozlzozlzozl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAgu2Ut2XOE

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 6:32 pm Nicole

        Four minutes and fifty-four seconds of my life that I will never get back.

        Damn you.

        LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 11:49 pm Prof. Woland

      Children take priority over your life including dating. There is a rule to follow, don’t introduce that person to your children until you know they will stick around. This guy has the worst of both worlds. When the kids are with mom he is still around them which means he has no love life and when the kids are with him, his ex-wife is hanging around making it hard for him to be a good father.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:01 pm Nicole

        The kids should always come first. I wonder though, what good it does them for the parents to be living such starkly separate lives. Are they really better off this way?

        I’m looking at this couple’s situation, and it seems to me the problem from the beginning was a lack of authority structure. The woman never really felt she belonged to this guy, so when the marriage broke, they were two separate stand-alone units instead of an adjusted unit.

        LikeLike


  27. on July 8, 2013 at 3:17 pm William

    So they just saved the kids from being taken back and forth to a parents house then ?

    LikeLike


  28. on July 8, 2013 at 3:31 pm earl

    Canada…well that explains it.

    I could take over that country by just saying that I want to. They would make me their king.

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 3:46 pm Earl

      You would be met on mooseback, hockey sticks in hand, mullets loose in the wind, as they charge your lines of feminist drone operators and pantsless homos in the Kuwaiti fighting position behind them.

      LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 3:49 pm Earl

        Kuwaiti fighting position: http://www.rumormillnews.com/pix5/Obama2NetanyahuFeetOnDesk1.jpg

        Should be renamed to Obama Fighting Position?

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:41 am Matthew King

        EARL ON EARL ACTION

        LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 5:27 pm Reggie

      Maybe in the cities, but good luck taking out the real men.

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 7:28 pm Chris from Dublin

      Haha – but there is more truth in this remark than even you might realise

      LikeLike


  29. on July 8, 2013 at 3:43 pm not_PC

    “In related news, the West is still collapsing. Event horizon endgame should be any day now.”

    When.

    The Futurist predicts 2020 is when the Misandry Bubble will pop. I’m curious what others think.

    LikeLike


  30. on July 8, 2013 at 3:47 pm JAB

    What a little b!tch he is. I’d be pullin in a coupla nice lil perky tit sluts and rail em in broad view of that short haired feminist cunt.

    Speaking of which.

    LikeLike


  31. on July 8, 2013 at 3:53 pm HeManMasterOfThePooniverse

    Picture worth a thousand words

    LikeLike


  32. on July 8, 2013 at 4:05 pm nightskyradio

    “Lurid Soul Castration” would be a great name for a band.

    For that matter, so would “Event Horizon Endgame.”

    LikeLike


  33. on July 8, 2013 at 4:28 pm aleister

    OT: Creative Assembly (a game developer) makes all the ANCIENT germans black haired because otherwise it would be racist wtf?
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?590564-Blond-Germans

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 8:31 am Greg Eliot

      That’s why Schwarzenegger gets paired with Rae Dawn Chong, Vanessa William, and Maria Conchita Alonso. lulz

      LikeLike


  34. on July 8, 2013 at 4:38 pm Chris from Dublin

    I couldn’t be happier to see Beta of The Month back again. The rich depth of this tragic-comedic well should never be underestimated. That is, until one remembers that these articles are reflecting real life …
    Here, courtesy of England, is the diametric opposite of Beta of the Month …

    Here is some information about Mick Philpott …
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mick_Philpott
    … and here is a full-length television documentary about him (originally broadcast on the UK channel, itv1. For interest, compare and contrast British tv style with that in the U.S.)

    There have been many programmes made about this whole case, which still grips British and Irish public opinion, but I chose what I consider to be the fairest and most balanced one.

    I have posted about Mick Philpott before and I reiterate that I consider him to be a stupid, violent lout. However, remember this – despite killing all of her children, his wife did not divorce him and, indeed, was recorded by the Derbyshire Constabulary conspiring with him – the man who had killed all of her children – to get him acquitted. That is, she did not file for divorce.
    Viewing the TV footage from before the fire, it is noticeable that Philpott has something mentioned on the Chateau before – the smirk of alpha.
    What Mick Philpott did was wrong. Nevertheless, it remains unlikely that he will ever be nominated for Beta of the Month.
    The economy and social structure of the west is collapsing because it has now become accepted to punish honesty, kindness and hard work and to reward liars, bullies and the lazy. Bring the flames, oh, bring the flames …

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 5:05 pm Plumnuts

      His whole game was about taking from daddy, playing by daddys rules and complaining to all and sundry when he didn’t get what he thought daddy promised him. Doesn’t sound like an alpha to me TBH.

      LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 7:27 pm Chris from Dublin

      Actually, I should have read the initial post more closely because then I would have noticed the one important word …

      Canada

      They are STRANGE people (not even to mention the French Canadians …)

      This is what you get when a culture devotes itself to the avoidance of conflict at all costs.

      I looked at the article more closely and, yes, the man is paying the bill.

      “Bird’s nesting” happens a fair bit in that strange area of provinces which is not quite a real country but nestled between Alaska and the rest of the US.

      Indeed, the Premier of Ontario has divorced her husband and come out as a lesbian, but continued to raise her children in a bird’s nest.

      Canada: one entire lump of niceness and civility.

      I weep, I really do …

      LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 7:41 pm Ben Gurion

        Thanks man. I thought it was just me.

        LikeLike


      • on July 8, 2013 at 9:43 pm CoffeeCrazed

        What year was it that USA entered WWII?

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:48 am Matthew King

        People do not understand the quaintly picaresque little-brother psychosis north of the border. It is mostly because people rarely think of them at all. Which has driven them insane. Toronto is a multiculturalist utopia — read: hell on earth.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 12:37 pm corvinus

        They’re importing diversity by the bucketload to spice up their boring country. They’re actually doing it three times faster than we in the USA are, and the only reason for that is because the South wasn’t able to secede a century and a half ago, and the South helps keep our immigration policy semi-rational.

        LikeLike


  35. on July 8, 2013 at 4:46 pm Tom the Democrat

    Dora and I broke up. She says she fell in love with someone else. Not sure what to do.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 7:57 pm Judah Ben Hur

      Consider yourself lucky.

      LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2013 at 12:25 pm Matthew King

      What did you expect? She’s an Explorer.

      LikeLike


  36. on July 8, 2013 at 5:00 pm CoffeeCrazed

    If he was smiling he’d be beta. If he was forced out of his house…”oh look, poor beta shlub .” If he only got to see his kids every other weekend, he’d be just another herbling.

    Is not creating your line something of an alpha goal? Thus, when that happens, doesn’t perspective change from chasing poon to raising your offspring? Not suggesting that this guy actually is alpha. I am suggesting that his behavior is not explicitly beta.

    LikeLike


  37. on July 8, 2013 at 5:20 pm Uncle Elmer

    Mr. Kirkland just needs his own ForeignBride to spice up that situation.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 2:22 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Imagine if they get divorced too and his first ex wife has to share a duplex with his second ex wife while he sleeps in a trailer in the yard 😉

      LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 6:27 am Kate

        That would *really* make the lawn situation confusing!

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 8:16 am Uncle Elmer

        Yeah but for a while there the smell of fish sauce and the sound of the bedframe rythmically tapping the common wall between them would more than offset the visual of his ex-wife entering the domocile with Ja’Vaughn.

        LikeLike


  38. on July 8, 2013 at 6:02 pm someguy

    Eerie that she looks exactly, I mean exactly, like the mother of a friend of mine whose folks split up but shared the same dusty old Victorian home with separate bedrooms. The arrangement deeply effed the kids up even though they were older when the divorce happened.

    LikeLike


  39. on July 8, 2013 at 6:08 pm Starrman

    Haven’t posted in some time. This disgusting man is royally destroying his children. His daughters will run over men with the help of the royal mounties, and the real pisser, is that if he had a son he would be another of the ball-less Canadians. Mind you I have friends in Quebec and BC, but they let the women run them. Just sad, makes me want to wretch…

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 7:57 pm Ben Gurion

      What can be done about it from a Canadian’s perspective? What’s even possible to achieve theere in terms of equal treatment before the law when mens’ interests conflict with those of women? Will the current government be able to do away with the Human Rights Commission?

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 10:02 pm meh

      Sadly, one of those ‘daughters’ is a boy with long hair and lipstick named Sean, and no he’s not running pre-stoner game either.

      LikeLike


  40. on July 8, 2013 at 7:16 pm gramps

    There is a simple solution to the problems of marriage: Don’t get married. Have your own life instead of what your wife permits you.
    If you must:
    1. Pre-nups.
    2. DNA testing.
    3. Know the law. If you do, you might skip marriage.

    About prenups. At one time they sounded crass. That was back in the day when two young and inexperienced people fell in love and married quickly to devote their lives to each other. Nowadays, marriage is almost in cold blood, especially for the woman. It is based on cold calculations including economic benefit, social benefit, and sexual pleasure. Love hardly enters into it. It is a joke. They laugh at the words, “Love, honor, and obey” during the marriage ceremony.

    Being beta is one thing. The bottom 90% is beta by definition. The math is inescapable. So, most men will be betas. But, being tooled is an entirely different matter. You have to work to be an alpha, but you volunteer to be tooled.

    And remember, women can get laid easily. Just because they can, is no reason why they should. Women should ask themselves why it is easy for them to get laid but not married. Men can get married easily. Just because they can is no reason why they should. Men should ask themselves why it is easy for them to get married but not laid.

    So, betas, there is never, never a good reason to wind up in that guy’s shoes.

    LikeLike


    • on July 8, 2013 at 10:03 pm Anonymous

      Well put

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 11:01 am Master Beta

      “women can get laid easily. Just because they can, is no reason why they should. Women should ask themselves why it is easy for them to get laid but not married. Men can get married easily. Just because they can is no reason why they should. Men should ask themselves why it is easy for them to get married but not laid.”

      +1

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 1:58 pm YaReally

      Personally, as I get older and this stuff becomes more relevant (if not for myself personally, then for all my friends getting married around me), it would be nice if someone in the Manosphere with solid red pill and legal understanding, wrote up a guide to basically “The Safest Way To Get Married” that described all the precautions a man should take and how to execute them.

      Like a lot of guys think a pre-nup is solid but they don’t know the nuances like “she has to sign it way ahead of the wedding or she can claim she was under duress and get it thrown out” or “if the pre-nup mentions custody, the whole thing will get thrown out” etc. that guys don’t think about.

      Same with the DNA testing, what kind of pressures and from who the guy should expect to run up against (I’ve heard even the doctors rush/pressure the man to sign the birth certificate) and how to neutralize the “don’t you trust me??” arguments the girl will put forward.

      And some basic legal stuff that will help a guy avoid trouble (like if things start going downhill in the marriage, start documenting everything to avoid running into child abuse and false rape claims in a divorce).

      And lastly a section on “So you’re heading toward a divorce”, of stuff to watch out for and prep ahead of time to hopefully avoid being raped in the divorce. Based on both initiating the divorce or expecting it to happen down the road, and on an emergency plan for if you get blindsided with the divorce papers completely out of the blue.

      A book like THAT, would be fucking useful and worth a purchase and gifting around to male friends, as we enter this new red pill aware era.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 2:33 pm Glengarry

        It would be a hell of a more powerful red pill than the dating one. Like you can be put in jail for 14 years because the judge thinks you have hidden assets to be turned into alimony $$. Like you might be granted the privilege of paying child support to your wife and the real father of that child (yay!). And so on.

        http://old.post-gazette.com/pg/09192/983301-454.stm#ixzz0L9AN7EEa&C
        http://voices.yahoo.com/presumed-fathers-act-man-pay-child-support-507695.html?cat=25

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 5:05 pm YaReally

        Ya, I look at it like, we all KNOW this thing is a terrible deal, but there isn’t really a resource I can point my buddy to and be like “um dude, I know you like this girl, but just give this a quick read before you get married, k? I just don’t want you to take any chances ’cause you’re my bro.”

        As it is, all I can really do is warn him of anecdotes and vague random links to articles that he probably won’t spend the time to read, and point him to a bunch of whiny-ass manosphere commenters bitching about women, or men’s rights forums where everyone is labelled a mysoginist…not exactly convincing arguments for a guy who’s in love and saving up 3 months salary for a ring she doesn’t have to give back if she flakes on the wedding.

        Dunno, just saying, if anyone out there reading this has the time to put this kind of knowledge down into a nice concise non-bitter-sounding format, you could charge some $ for it and I can think of 3 or 4 guys I’d be handing it out to myself.

        That Men on Strike book by Helen Smith is awesome in terms of laying out the issues with marriage today, it’s not butt-hurt sounding or anything, all very logical and concise and addresses a lot of common “man up” arguments.

        But for a few more generations our friends, brothers, sons, etc. will still get one-itis for whatever possibly-shitty-quality-bipolar-psycho-chick they’re lucky enough to get to touch their penis, reject the red pill the way it’s presented here, and get sucked into the social conditioning brainwashing that they need to get married the traditional way.

        It would be nice to have a way to at least minimize the damage to those guys, if we can’t save them. And they sure as shit aren’t going to read this comment section lol

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 11:37 am Glengarry

        The problem is, any mitigation will still seem pretty paranoid. Lovestruck penistouchee is unlikely to take it seriously. Go for someone easier to convince instead and call it … “So your son is getting married”.

        Write it in the non-butthurt style of “Keep in mind that your chances of survival drop considerably if you are moved away from the original location of abduction.”

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 11:40 am Glengarry

        Did my reply just get crumpled up and thrown away? Ugh, I’ll repeat the core: don’t aim the book at lovestruck penistouchee, but his parents.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 2:39 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Tom Leykis did a whole hour on that. It’s a whole song and dance, it’s gonna run you easily in the low 5 figures. And it’s still good to hide assets if the laws change… On the other hand I know a guy who dropped over 80k on the fucking wedding alone.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 3:55 pm Eric S. Mueller

        My divorce isn’t even final yet. For an uncontested divorce, it still ran me $15,000. There is an entire industry set up to suck money out of people getting divorced. Apparently, going the traditional route with two competing law firms battling it out would have run more than 50k. The “Divorce Industrial Complex” makes a lot of money.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 5:36 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Yeah Eric, you know the sick thing about this system is, you got those two lawyers who try to make the thing as bitter and stretched out just so they can fleece more money out of their “clients”. These people have an incentive to make it as bad for their clients as possible. You can easily spend more than the whole equity in the marriage, stick the husband with the debt…

        Then afterwards, the lawyers share a beer and laugh at their marks.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 7:43 pm Eric S. Mueller

        Pretty much. Looking back, I should have just done the research on how to do it myself, but I didn’t want the divorce, she did. I told her to figure it out, so she picked this “divorce mediator”. I thought, great, uncontested divorce, should be cheaper. Still $350 per hour, but we had three sessions ranging from 3-5 hours each, plus all his prep work and the final documents. Still came out to 15k, and he even shaved about 4k off because he knew I had to pay the whole thing myself.

        I still think marriage counseling would have been cheaper and easier, but I’m not my ex-wife.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 6:31 am Kate

        Tsk, what a gentleman you are, Eric. The person wanting the divorce should pay for it. That right there would stop some of it. “Divorce? Do you have that kind of money lying around? Well, better start saving your pennies! Maybe next month.”

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 8:34 am Eric S. Mueller

        I did try, Kate. Problem is, I held up my end of the bargain as provider too well.

        I keep saying if I get married again, I’m getting a pre-nup that says if she wants a divorce, she pays for it and does all the work.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 6:36 am Lara

        A lot of women would think of better ways to spend $15,000 and decide their marriage wasn’t so bad.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 6:31 am not_PC

        Fuck. I remember this one guy was “saving-up” $50k to pay for his wedding with his pudgy fiance… I just looked at him and thought: You know, masturbation ain’t so bad.

        This was before I found out about the manosphere.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 10:13 pm meh

        Hi YaReally, always love your posts. You must put all your assets in a NON-DISCRETIONARY TRUST. You must also fund said trust so that it will not run out of funds within you or your ex-wife’s lifetime. By having a NON-DISCRETIONARY TRUST, you will have no say over your disbursements, that is your trustees job (A Bank). On the other hand, if you did have a say, you exercise control over said trust and it is attachable (lawyer speak for WE CAN TAKE THIS). The NON-DISCRETIONARY TRUST should pass along your assets to your children, not your wife/ex wife. Don’t give a woman a reason to kill you, she already dreams about it enough anyway. If you have no children, then give it to the Dalai Lama or some such, just let her know she doesn’t get shit if you’re dead. This trust needs to be created before you even MEET your next wife, otherwise you might be guilty of conspiring to hide assets, and the trust becomes attachable.

        LikeLike


  41. on July 8, 2013 at 7:18 pm gramps

    I notice the daughter in the background is “chubby.” She is on her way to being a find specimen of womanhood, mentally and physically.

    LikeLike


  42. on July 8, 2013 at 7:45 pm stevie tellatruth

    So divorce rape is so bad, dudes have to resort to “splitting” the house with the ex and the kids to mitigate the effects of the raping.

    Damn. Tough crowd.

    LikeLike


  43. on July 8, 2013 at 8:41 pm whorefinder

    We finally found Sweetheart Jason’s childhood home!

    Well, besides his faggy, loser father jacking off to his mom getting gangbanged by a crew of “Obama’s sons!”

    Mind rape!

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 5:00 pm corvinus

      Well, besides his faggy, loser father jacking off to his mom getting gangbanged by a crew of “Obama’s sons!”

      Democrat pr0n.

      LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2013 at 1:27 pm tspark156

      Am I right in thinking that mind rape once happened to Deanna Troi in episode of Star Trek TNG.

      LikeLike


      • on July 12, 2013 at 9:19 pm whorefinder

        Sadly, this I know is true.

        The mind rape was meant to be a metaphor for actual rape, since 1) rape was too graphic for TNG; and 2) because the show was for guys, not chicks.

        LikeLike


      • on July 14, 2013 at 2:27 pm tspark156

        Keep calm,
        &
        empathise
        with this

        LikeLike


      • on July 14, 2013 at 2:29 pm tspark156

        Empathise with RAPE.

        LikeLike


  44. on July 8, 2013 at 8:45 pm Beta Of The Month: The Divorce House « PUA Central

    […] Beta Of The Month: The Divorce House […]

    LikeLike


  45. on July 8, 2013 at 8:48 pm Musashi

    White, lesbian, skank.

    LikeLike


  46. on July 8, 2013 at 8:53 pm Jeff

    I agree with some others that this really isn’t that bad, keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Other divorced men pay out the ass for kids they never see and a house they never use.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 6:24 am supra

      +1

      LikeLike


  47. on July 8, 2013 at 8:58 pm Heythatsmycar

    Seriously, who came up with this idea of lingering around after a divorce for the benefit of children? A betrayed husband should just move to Asia or something. I’m pretty sure there is a biblical basis for that. In the end, his children will respect him for showing balls. Maybe after the collapse he will be held up a some sort of resistance fighter??

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 10:16 pm meh

      The children will never respect him after years of indoctrination. Best to write it off and start over in Asia.

      LikeLike


  48. on July 8, 2013 at 9:12 pm bigdickeddeadgordon

    In the same way that a woman who gives up sex easily and indiscriminately is rightly denounced as a ‘slut’, a man who provides emotional and economic support easily is a ‘hug slut’ or ‘bank slut’. I think a man should be as hesitant to open his heart as a good women is to open her legs.

    When it’s this dude’s week to babysit the kids he should feed them nothing but 2-minute noodles and water. When the wife complains, he should say “For each bj you give me I’ll provide $15 extra to support the children. Now show me how much you love the kids”.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 4:42 pm Greg Eliot

      Trust me… she’d rather see the kids starve than give him the satisfaction.

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 4:58 pm corvinus

      When it’s this dude’s week to babysit the kids he should feed them nothing but 2-minute noodles and water.

      That’s actually a good idea, since I’ve always liked the taste of ramen since I was a kid, and thus the kids shouldn’t hold it against him.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 8:41 pm Greg Eliot

        Everybody Love Ramen.

        LikeLike


  49. on July 8, 2013 at 9:26 pm Dude

    Hey, he got two kids out of her, and now he gets to sleep with younger, hotter women. It’s not ALL bad.

    LikeLike


  50. on July 8, 2013 at 10:13 pm dannyfrom504

    if i were him, i’d solict prostitues and have them make the sounds of sex as loudly as possible, whilst i sit back and sip a cold one with a smile on my face.

    LikeLike


  51. on July 8, 2013 at 10:39 pm Rum

    Indeed, seize the moment. He should from now on never let her see him with any chick not hotter than the she-bitch. Renting a hottie/whore is generally cheaper than woo-ing one anyway.
    This treatment must be applied with utter ruthlessness. Even if she is hosting her mothers wake on the other side of the door, make sure you have Esmarelda holding onto that door like it was the one thing strong enough to support and brace her for your love. The thumping sounds and the load moaning and the sound of wood cracking speaks a truth of its own. At times like this.

    LikeLike


  52. on July 8, 2013 at 10:55 pm Johnycomelately

    Option 2 is to let her have the whole house and pay child support while living in the back of his car.

    At least this way he can still strangle her while she is asleep…(disclaimer, just joking, don’t want to end up arrested for soliciting domestic violence).

    LikeLike


  53. on July 9, 2013 at 12:00 am SemblanceOfSanity

    First contestant for beta of the month, August edition: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=83e_1373329261 Woman solicits hitman to have her husband killed. Husband doesn’t want her to go to jail.

    LikeLike


  54. on July 9, 2013 at 4:39 am Eric S. Mueller

    I would be miserable in that situation. That guy has a total “FML” look on his face. Somehow I bet the arrangement was his ex-wife’s idea. “For the children” or course.

    I live 180 miles away from my ex-wife. I’m close enough to be able to make daytrips home to see the children, but far enough away that I rarely have to think about her.

    LikeLike


  55. on July 9, 2013 at 4:48 am earl

    It’s so sad when lesbian couples split up.

    LikeLike


  56. on July 9, 2013 at 5:01 am Robert

    Am I the only one whose gaydar is pinging? Mr Kirkland is still half in the closet, (as the photo shows, funnily enough). I agree that he has a FML puss, but I suspect it’s more because he fancies his wife more now she looks more openly les.

    Funnily enough, my ex-wife came from one of these shared nest families. The marriage was over, dad being a piss-the-bed alcoholic, but he lived in the former lounge and mum had the upstairs. Works out well when both are poor but there’s no mortgage on the house.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 6:22 am earl

      He’s either secretly gay…or has the testosterone levels of a dyke.

      LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2013 at 11:46 am Subway Masturbator

      Jesus, talk about kicking a guy when he’s down…

      LikeLike


      • on July 11, 2013 at 5:13 am plowman

        Yup, anyone not alpha HAS to be gay. sounds familiar, oh yeah cunts…

        LikeLike


  57. on July 9, 2013 at 5:26 am desiderius

    Look closely at the daughter.

    Unhappy SWPL girls eat too much to fill the void.

    There are (at least) two unhappy people in that pic.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 3:18 pm embracingourfemininity

      That’s the parent’s fault. She’s still a child, overfeeding children is terrible.

      LikeLike


  58. on July 9, 2013 at 5:27 am yaser

    LikeLike


  59. on July 9, 2013 at 6:33 am Bob Sacamano

    Make that Beta of the Century.

    LikeLike


  60. on July 9, 2013 at 7:02 am Wolfie65

    Vegas bets dollars to donuts the woman’s a dyke.
    The guy can pretty much forget about ‘dating’ anyone, because any and all women will look at his situation as ‘he lives with his ex’ and run.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 7:37 am Customer Service

      Like everything in life it depends on his attitude.

      “Yeah, me and the wife got a divorce and I made her live in half the house so I can keep an eye on her and my children while I get to pursue more fulfilling relationships.”

      vs.

      “I live with my ex wife. I know, it’s crazy, but part of me still loves her and we agree it’s best for the children, hope it doesn’t bother you.”

      LikeLike


  61. on July 9, 2013 at 8:02 am anotheronetakesthepill

    Versus Alpha of the Century: George Clooney and Stacy Keibler apparently ended their romance because she wants children

    http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/george-clooney-stacy-keibler-split-report-article-1.1392894

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 8:24 am earl

      33…she’s at her expiration date.

      LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 5:14 am Caramba

        Amazing how this 33 number works.Mathematical precision.

        LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 8:53 am Neecy

      Frankly, Stacey knew better from the get go. I don’t know why women do this especially as their eggs are decreasing and they are getting older. I don’t understand how a woman who wants marriage and kids believes getting together with a well known playboy who has never shown any interest in marriage let alone kids and whose g/f’s last approx 1-2 years would result in marriage and kids???

      She knew exactly what she was getting into, but like most delusional women, she probably believed she could “be the one to change him” and unfortunatley 2 years later she is now back to square one. Part of me also believes she was looking for a career boost, by getting with him as well.

      Ladies, YOU CANNOT CHANGE A MAN! If you see a pattern, then keep it moving if that pattern he has is not in line with your long term goals and you are reaching an age where it gets harder for marriage and kids with the right fellow.

      Also, waiting two years to *DISCOVER* that he doesn’t share the same views with you on marriage and kids is ludacris! It doesn’t take a man 2 years to figure out whether he wants to marry you and have kids with you.

      Men do not hesitate with these things like so many women believe. if a man WANTS you as his wife, eh will move heaven and earth to make that happen and fairly quickly if he is ready.

      *sigh* 🙄

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:55 pm corvinus

        Because Clooney is an alpha, and Keibler thought he might change his mind about having kids with her. But, he’s also apparently a pure hedonist, so nothing doing.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 6:35 am Kate

        Spill the beans, Neecy! What’s happening? 🙂 🙂 🙂

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 6:42 am cryo

        “Men do not hesitate with these things like so many women believe. if a man WANTS you as his wife, eh will move heaven and earth to make that happen and fairly quickly if he is ready.”

        Only if he’s beta. In which case the woman would lose her desire for marriage and kids with said beta.

        Anybody even a little versed in Game knows that the best way to keep a woman around these days is to not even try. This usually means ruling out marriage and kids, because the moment a man expresses his inclination towards commitment, the woman is already working on grinding him down to a beta pulp while her hypergamous instincts seek out fresh alpha seed.

        Its the great paradox of modern relationships, but in the end, the wise man will always win.

        LikeLike


  62. on July 9, 2013 at 8:10 am whatmeworry

    You mean he gets to stay around to mow the lawn and fix shit? Wooo sign me up.

    Better to mentally detach, pretend your kids were eaten by bears, and leave her to sleep in the bed she made. If your daughter ends up on the pole, so be it. Ditch the country and go make some new ones.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 9:57 am Divorced Dad

      No actual (white) father could write this. You can’t understand the love and concern a (civilized, human) father has for his daughters. A divorced father cannot leave his kids to suffer the fate they’d suffer if they had only the mom without his help.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:47 pm Greg Eliot

        Bullshit…

        I’ve long held the opinion (and voiced it to the missus early on) that, if you don’t want a husband, you don’t want a father for the children… so if you make that bed, be prepared to lie in it.

        Still married after two decades and four children.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 10:25 pm meh

        Nice one Greg. Any civilized man knows that seeing their kids for four days a month for losing 66% of their paycheck means you are the biggest loser ever. Four days a month is the equivalent of them being raised by a single mom.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 6:08 pm Lara

        Just remember, when it comes to mothers and daughters, the apple never falls far from the tree.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 7:21 am Greg Eliot

        Apple? More like the nut.

        LikeLike


  63. on July 9, 2013 at 8:45 am Neecy

    Hmmm. I don’t see it so bad unless he was sacrificing his love life and future to find someone else. He or she can always *GO* to places to see or have sex with someone else if that is what they really needed. IOW’s they can have relationships, but just outside of their home. More people need this set up IMO b/c too many people of divorced situations bring assholes, crazies, trash and just questionable people around their children once they start dating again. And the other parent really has no control over that even if they fear their children may be exposed to some idiot their ex wife/husband is dating.

    I think too many people just bring any old person they are dating around their kids (especially after divorce) and IMO that is not very good for children AT ALL.

    In this case, the kids are still protected by having both parents in the home and both accountable for whom they bring around their children.

    So his love life nor hers has ended, they can find ways to have that – just not in their current home. It seems they have chosen their children FIRST and FOREMOST over their sexual needs, something that more people should be doing IMO.

    LikeLike


  64. on July 9, 2013 at 8:48 am M3

    Late to the party.

    This is exactly what my ex wife wanted me to do (sans kids). She was under the impression that since we didn’t argue, fight or throw things at each other, that we could stay in the same home and live life as we always had.. minus the sex or love that preceded it.

    I told her in no uncertain terms i was selling the place off.

    The reason she is so happy in the pic is because she’s living the feminist dream and having it all. She conned a man into marrying her, having kids, and dumping him so she can concentrate all of her life on the kids and not have to give a shit about the man who helped father them. She keeps his utility, keeps the home (albeit shared) and life is great for everyone in her mind.

    And yes, she looks like a lesbian in the pic. Christ Jebus.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 8:56 am Neecy

      I don’t see it that way UNLESS she is trying to control his life.

      In your situation you didn’t have kids so it made no sense for your ex wife to try to control your life after the divorce by asking your to continue to live under the same roof. if there were kids involved I could see it.

      I don’t think its such a bad arrangement, since it puts children first. They didn’t ask to be brought into this world and children should be living in a two parent home with the adults that made the choice to marry and pro create.

      They can still have their lives and sex lives, but its just not gonna be some free for all where they can just bring any Tom Dick Harry or Sue, Becky and Kim around their kids.

      LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 6:39 am Kate

        You can live in separate homes and still not bring every Tom, Dick, or Harry around your children. These children will actually be seeing more people brought into their home rather than less. They’ll see people pulling up to the driveway (is it shared? who shovels it?) rather than being away and not knowing at all what the other parent is up to on their non-custodial time.

        LikeLike


  65. on July 9, 2013 at 10:10 am Prof

    “they’re doing what many separated couples say they want to do; put the kids first.”

    Ah, yeah. And who gets to define what the childrens’ needs are? Even my semi-insane female roommate from decades ago was willing to point out that her brother’s wife got do define the childrens’ needs, and so had total control of the husband.

    Ex-hubby beta boy isn’t going to have any further children unless he puts the current ones on a strict budget.

    LikeLike


  66. on July 9, 2013 at 10:20 am Some guys really are fucking stupid!!!!!

    […] […]

    LikeLike


  67. on July 9, 2013 at 10:35 am Tinderbox

    Emasculating? Yes, but it is a better arrangement for the children and better for their emotional health growing up. He only needs to put up with it until the kids are up and out at 18. No divorce at all would have been better, but I applaud them for doing this as a way to mitigate divorce damage on the children. Once you marry and have children the priority is no longer your personal satisfaction and love life. You’re obligated, short of taking spousal abuse, to provide a stable and consistent life for your children until adulthood.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 10:48 am Jack

      So the emotional health of every child of divorced, non-cohabitating parents is being damaged? You’re an idiot.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 2:36 pm cynthia

        Yes, actually. There are very few cases where divorce benefits the kids.

        LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 12:04 pm Sam Spade

      Incorrect. What’s best for the children is two happy, healthy parents invested in them. It may seem like one should be miserable “for the sake of the children,” but what kind of kids will a miserable parent raise? And rest assured in a “divorce house,” one miserable parent = two miserable parents. Give these kids the two Christmases and favor-leveraging gifts they deserve. Even having and raising a child is at its core a selfish, not selfless, act.

      Also notice your frame: He must “put up with it.” She obviously had her cake and is eating it, too. Why can’t she “put up” with something – say, paying for her own damn house?

      LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2013 at 6:41 am Kate

      Eighteen years is a looooong time (especially to be miserable).

      LikeLike


  68. on July 9, 2013 at 10:50 am McDanger

    Only a beta would be bothered by some Onega pumping his old ass ex wife. Who cares if he is bringing hot chicks home.

    Edit, this specific case lacks relevance as Edmonton has zero hot chicks.

    Point still stands though.

    LikeLike


  69. on July 9, 2013 at 11:08 am AAB

    >Is it really good for the children to see their father so pathetically emasculated on a daily basis?<

    And that's the exact catch-all statement that Lefties make whenever they want to ban something: "Just think of the children!" It's just another example that Lefties don't care about the children and just speak for effect: to guilt-tripping everyone else into agreeing with them.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 11:44 am feministx

      Somewhere perhaps there is a study to assess the general psychological health of children of divorced parents where the father gets raw deal (mom gets house and lives off alimony and child support while father sees kids infrequently against his wishes) vs. children of divorced parents where neither parent gets shafted.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 10:11 pm ab

        Studies have shown that divorces are more stressful for kids then the death of a parent. Still waiting for some women to use this as justification for murdering her husband.
        My dad got a slightly raw deal in his divorce(insignificant really compared to todays standard) anyway it was quite clear to us kids that it was unfair and orchestrated by mom. And our opinion of her was lessened for it. Kids are friggin sponges they see all the stupid little underlying crap.

        LikeLike


  70. on July 9, 2013 at 11:46 am avd

    Matt,
    I’ve been watching you for a time, never quite sure where to place you. I’m now publically stating that you are a bad motherfucking ass. Rarely (never?) has another human’s self-expression so resonated with my own. Good on you, dog.
    avd

    LikeLike


  71. on July 9, 2013 at 12:30 pm Nestor

    She could have had him shot in the face…..

    Watch the fat 21 year old hiring an undercover cop to do it.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/video-ex-jersey-hires-hitman-kill-husband-article-1.1393731

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 1:25 pm The Bechtloff

      To be fair that would be quicker and more humane than this slow castration.

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 2:55 pm George

      The husband of that fat 21yo is surely the Beta of the Month. The wife was caught on video hiring a hit man to murder her husband for his $400,000 life insurance policy. After conviction, “Her husband and intended victim asked that she get no jail time at all”.
      http://www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/index.ssf/2013/07/caught_on_video_muskegons_wido.html

      He tolerates a wife hiring a hit man!! He is as low as it gets.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:05 pm The Bechtloff

        Maybe he wants her out of jail so he can kill her himself. Nah, you’re probably right, he’s probably just a sad little gamma.

        I say gamma not beta, because I think even a beta would have to look down on that lack of self respect.

        LikeLike


  72. on July 9, 2013 at 1:00 pm Anti-Blue Pill

    Sad but avoidable outcome. so…. hahahahahahahahaha

    LikeLike


  73. on July 9, 2013 at 2:42 pm Amanjaw Marcuntte

    Remember, Canada is the nation that squeezed out this turd:

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 2:55 pm The Bechtloff

      Ahh yes the famous Scarlet She-Hulk. What a sad sad creature she is. I would say that she just needs to get laid, but I’m pretty sure any self respecting man would sooner stick his dick in a rusty key hole nailed to a hornet’s nest before fucking her.

      LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 2:01 am Anonymous

        The “Scarlet She Hunk” probably has a kevlar reinforced, teflon coated, 12 speed vibrator that runs of three phase power and dims the street lights when in use.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 9:25 am Hugh G. Rection

        A cross between Oil rig and Jackhammer.

        LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 11:57 am thebechtloff

        Due to the corrosive nature of her toxic vag tho she has to replace it weekly.

        LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 3:43 pm Tom the Democrat

      Best Richard Linklater movie ever!

      LikeLike


  74. on July 9, 2013 at 2:43 pm garter snake

    The wife looks like Annette Bening’s domineering lesbian character in ‘The Kids Are Alright’. Horrible.

    LikeLike


  75. on July 9, 2013 at 2:58 pm avd

    This is an important point:

    But that is a problem with you and your fatherless existence more than it is intelligent advice for young men searching for meaning.

    If not, then what the fuck are we doing here, little girls? Hey, little bitches, do you think that we are here so that you can go out and plunder our women? Even Heartiste isn’t here for that. I think that all the ego=subsumed little bitches, including YaReally, forget that what the entire MS is about is scrapping, and scraping, and clawing, and fighting to generate “intelligent advice for your men searching for meaning.” All of you little bity pussies that fight for scraps of your own manhood should remember this: it’s about liberating men. Facepalm. Ungodly pussies.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 4:13 pm Tom the Democrat

      That was an important point. Thanks for elucidating it for us.

      LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 4:29 pm Ben Gurion

        Taking heed is critical for you if you ever want to be a man.

        LikeLike


      • on July 9, 2013 at 5:19 pm yeahokcool

        lol… burn!!!! tom the democrat agrees with you, avd!

        regardless, avd, i suspect you’re either drunk or high as your post makes very little sense beyond being obviously full of vitriolic, yet impotent, rage.

        LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 4:55 pm YaReally

      I *think* you might’ve insulted me in there, but I’m not sure wtf you just wrote lol

      Either way I support liberating men. That’s why I write about the things I write about.

      LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 5:32 pm immoralgables

      AVD,

      Every time I read a comment of yours I’m reminded of two things

      1) You add no value to the readership of Chateau Heartiste (or Rational Male).

      2) You don’t go out and you def don’t approach.

      Is being an e-thug your only outlet in life where you feel better about yourself?

      That’s a rhetorical question, fucktard.

      LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2013 at 10:51 am bob

      Damn, the gay brigade is out.

      LikeLike


  76. on July 9, 2013 at 2:59 pm Glengarry

    Beta bucks ….. ✓

    LikeLike


  77. on July 9, 2013 at 3:21 pm Sidewinder

    Divorced Dad here…

    I could care less about what/who my trash-ass ex-wife does at this point. I bang hotter girls than her. But the same house is too close. I don’t want my kids a wall away when I’m with girls, and I definitely don’t want my kids that close to my ex’s non-kid life. It would be ideal if the ex lived about 1/2 a mile away, on a different street, so that my kids could walk or ride bikes to both homes. I generally agree with the logic that with a divorce, the number one concern should be making an arrangement that is best for the kids.

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 7:33 pm avd

      Sidewinder belives in the Maddona-Whore complex. Hahahhaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2013 at 6:50 am Kate

      We’re on diagonal lots. Its been nearly five years. There have been ups and downs. Some positives and some negatives. The thing is, we were neighbors originally. Just a different part of the neighborhood. In my strange mentality at the time of the divorce, I was trying to put him back where I found him. Not strip him of everything we’d tried to accomplish together.

      LikeLike


  78. on July 9, 2013 at 4:25 pm She Wants The D

    So the guy lives in that closet, or. . .

    LikeLike


  79. on July 9, 2013 at 4:31 pm Judah Ben Hur

    I saw my ex once after we got divorced to pick up some stuff and haven’t seen her since. It has been 20 years now. Thank God I never had kids with her.

    LikeLike


  80. on July 9, 2013 at 5:04 pm anonymous does not forgive

    The husband in this story is more beta, based on the last sentence

    http://gma.yahoo.com/video/woman-caught-tape-allegedly-planning-130057183.html

    LikeLike


  81. on July 9, 2013 at 6:10 pm avd

    This is actually an important conversation taking place. The little girls should just go away. Go away, little girls. Or, even better, come see me in person, little girls.

    LikeLike


  82. on July 9, 2013 at 6:38 pm avd

    Hey, Heartiste, how about this? No more pussies being strong ONLINE. Make them put up or show up. That seems fair. Otherwise you will have, as you currently have, pussies invading your site. Come on. Or do you rely on pussies for your traffic? Pathetic.

    LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2013 at 11:43 am Subway Masturbator

      Yeah, Imperator Heartiste. And you should start with heroic e-thug e-tard avd. But you should wait, I think he’s having a hissy because he’s having such a hard time learning how to read and write.

      LikeLike


  83. on July 9, 2013 at 6:45 pm Serenety

    While its great to poor scorn on this fellows misery, its rare the person who doesn’t enjoy it, the facts are there are and will continue to be numerous like minded stories published throughout the MSM for the foreseeable future, and we can continue on our merry way reflecting our major insights to one another, without actually helping our fellow man who may not even know there is help at hand.

    One of the things I suggest is really needed to those with the time, knowledge and capability in “The Sphere” is to somehow track down these guys email addresses and start sending them links to various Sphere articles that suit the mans circumstance, whether from CH, MMSL, Rational Male, Roosh, ROK, et al.

    Not to change his mind on his blue pill ways, to give him the information that there are other options and help is at hand.

    All men in the blue pill game who are vilified in the MSM won’t be getting red pill game from the MSM.

    They could be getting it from red pill gamers bypassing the MSM.

    LikeLike


  84. on July 9, 2013 at 7:55 pm McGonzo

    Another betaherb – Dustin Hoffman:

    http://www.upworthy.com/dustin-hoffman-breaks-down-crying-explaining-something-that-every-woman-sadly-already-experienced-3?g=3

    OMFG.

    o.O

    LikeLike


    • on July 9, 2013 at 9:12 pm Scray

      lol gtfoh. ya no, no guy knows those feels at all.

      LikeLike


  85. on July 9, 2013 at 9:42 pm Canadian Friend

    Lately my comments all get stuck in the filter and do not get posted so what the hell?

    I may as well be completely off topic as this will probably never see the light of day,

    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/101m-get-food-aid-federal-gov-t-outnumber-full-time-private-sector-workers

    A third of the USA population or about 101 Million receives food aid

    the private sector employs about 97,000,000 people

    more people on food aid than with jobs in the private sector

    this is worse than it is has ever been

    yet Obama’s popularity remains high

    If Obama is still popular it is because this type of information is swept under the carpet by his friends in the main Stream Media and the average citizen never hears about it…or simply because most people would rather have fun than get informed

    I’ll say it again ; A third of the USA population receives food aid.

    Is that the hope and change we were waiting for?

    ok so wordpress filter, do your freakin’magic and eat up my comment again

    LikeLike


  86. on July 9, 2013 at 10:02 pm Father Knows Best: Weird Asian Nazi Fetish Edition | Patriactionary

    […] Heartiste: Beta Of The Month: The Divorce House […]

    LikeLike


  87. on July 10, 2013 at 12:12 am Mr.C

    I LOL’d

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=rationalization%20hamster

    Waiting for the day when the term becomes included in the Oxford English Dictionary.

    LikeLike


  88. on July 10, 2013 at 3:14 am Caramba

    Go and make kids with another b* tch.
    No need to suffer under one roof with the satan itself.

    LikeLike


  89. on July 10, 2013 at 5:18 am Caramba

    Funny she has this weird smirk.One of my exes,a very very twisted Ukrainian ex-stripper had exactly the same.Its like I am looking at her 20 years older.

    Different cultures,different women,different ages-the same bloody smirk.

    LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2013 at 11:45 am Subway Masturbator

      There’s no such thing as an ex-stripper, only strippers who got too old and are now worn-out whores.

      LikeLike


  90. on July 10, 2013 at 5:32 am Burton

    In related news, the West is still collapsing. Event horizon endgame should be any day now.

    Amen.

    This is one more reason that Americans are arming.

    And why men in the rest of the world should be pushing for a Right to Bear Arms.

    Be prepared to form warlord bands!

    LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2013 at 8:12 am Us

      In related news, indeed, the world is currently dangerous and about to enter chaos because there are too many sub-80 IQ black people here. http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/07/09/3492011/justice-department-find-miami.html

      Trayvon Martin result is dangerous. I’m not gloating; I have kids in this world.

      LikeLike


      • on July 10, 2013 at 12:38 pm Us

        To clarify my comment: you do *not* want to get a flat tire in the areas these cops were dealing with.

        LikeLike


  91. on July 10, 2013 at 5:49 am walawala

    “”Ms. McGrath and Mr. Kirkland say that their family arrangement takes priority and that a new partner would need to respect this.””

    This is about frame control.

    She still gets to control him without having to have sex with him to do it.

    The house is one big vagina…

    When things fell apart they probably had a “talk” which she initiated knowing that at her age and in that city—Edmonton–an industrial provincial capital—he might still be able to get some single mom gf while she will never do any better.

    This is allowing her to control her ex-husband without having sex with him.

    He rationalizes it as making it about being easier to see their kids.

    The reality is it allows both of them to keep an eye on each other.

    LikeLike


  92. on July 10, 2013 at 6:49 am peterike

    Oh dear friends, there are LOTS more pictures of these two. Lots. This is my favorite.

    Seems their little story is in article after article in the Canadian press. They’ve been on TV, even in a documentary! And in nearly every photo, she is smiling like the Precious Little Snowflake she is, basking in the camera, while he looks miserable.

    Obvious conclusion? She is a total attention whore who can’t get in front of enough cameras, and perhaps the most beta thing about this beta is how he repeatedly submits to public humiliation via the media which he obviously is unhappy about. Yet he shows up again and again.

    Guess what else? She is “business manager” at a High School, whatever that is. Whoda thunk she’d be a member of the government parasite class! He, on the other hand, owns his own house construction company, which normally would be pretty Alpha. And thus he was able to custom design and build their little Dream(hell) House. (Reminds me of the Joe Jackson lyrics: “In every dream home a nightmare.”)

    Oh, and the split house was her idea. Shocker.

    You can watch them in all their glory here. He looks like he just wishes he were dead.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/life-video/video-divorced-couple-share-unique-family-home-after-split/article12598057/

    LikeLike


  93. on July 10, 2013 at 6:54 am peterike

    Oh and Monica is a runner (SWPL enough for ya?). And she wants to MEET YOU! For running. And stuff.

    Edmonton MEC Running Meetup Group

    Edmonton, AB
    225 Edmonton Runners

    We are a group of runners who meet up on Tuesday nights at 6pm at the Edmonton Mountain Equipment Co-op. This is a social run that welcomes all skill levels. Whether you’re ru…

    Next Meetup

    Ladies Specific Running Meetup

    Monday, Aug 25, 2014, 6:00 PM
    1 Attending

    Check out this Meetup Group →

    LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2013 at 11:51 am Us

      zlzolzozlzozllzo here she goes: http://www.meetup.com/Edmonton-MEC-Running-Meetup-Group/members/68857342/ zlzolzolzozlzl cool beard bro

      LikeLike


  94. on July 10, 2013 at 7:24 am Ruxman

    Fuck that shit is harsh, his face!! her fucking smug look

    LikeLike


  95. on July 10, 2013 at 7:38 am Louis Thorndon

    I agree with your commentary, as I almost always do, but I think that there is another side to the story. He is trying to do the best for his children. Although I think that he should put his own interests first, I cannot condemn anyone who unselfishly tries to do the best for his children, even as his heart breaks. I myself played an extremely long game with an evil ex-wife – narcissist. The matter ended a couple of years ago with my adult daughters who live with me getting a restraining order against her and her criminal lawyers telling her to “shut up” in court. But few get that sort of satisfaction.

    LikeLike


    • on July 10, 2013 at 8:18 am Us

      But it’s not satisfying to know you made her the mother of your kids. Not judging; I’m in a similar situation but I have years to go.

      LikeLike


  96. on July 10, 2013 at 2:30 pm xxxxx

    I think this is a friggin GREAT set up !!! My husband and I love each other and have been together for 14 years now but I sure think we would both love this arrangement. Loving each other is not hard but living with each other can be so having my own space and his own space and our children able to roam around freely is just just AWESOME !

    LikeLike


  97. on July 10, 2013 at 4:03 pm Alpha Confidence

    This makes me sick to be from Edmonton. Fuck this place I’m moving.

    LikeLike


  98. on July 10, 2013 at 5:43 pm Tacomaster

    I’m so sick of American women chopping off their f’n hair and turning into quasi-dudes. I think that’s the first indication your marriage is doomed; when she no longer cares about being mistaken for an asexual being.

    LikeLike


  99. on July 10, 2013 at 9:46 pm tacomaster

    I’m so sick of American women chopping off their f’n hair and turning into quasi-dudes (he/shes). I think that’s the first indication your marriage is doomed; when she no longer cares about being mistaken for an asexual being.

    This guy needs to bang some college aged girls and get his balls back ASAP.

    LikeLike


  100. on July 10, 2013 at 11:15 pm Third Beta from the Sun

    I feel like ive seen the ghost of Christmas future. This is the new, cool, beta divorce. Betas cant even get that right. Betas will go to all lengths to not be the bad guy.

    LikeLike


  101. on July 15, 2013 at 5:42 pm Kenny Pua

    How about Alpha of the month for a post, unless I’m missing the boat on this one.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    oink on “Conspiracy Theory…
    oink on Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat C…
    oink on Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat C…
    oink on Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat C…
    Pale Rider on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    PDB on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    oink on Slutty Women Are Unhappier Tha…
    posts only tweets on The Confound Of Silence
    earl on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    earl on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hivemind Is Real
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Manifest Depravity
    • The Diminishing Returns Of Anti-White Virtue Signaling
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Revolutionary Spirals To Civil War 2
    • Demography Is Destiny
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: