• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Reader Mailbag: A Mighty Fuck Given Edition
Chicks Dig Jerks: The Truth Is Breaching Containment Zone »

Playing Mind Games With Feminists

July 17, 2013 by CH

Reader “A G” gleefully proposes a psychological torture mechanism to send feminists writhing in paroxysms of hamster-rending pain.

How to destroy a Cathedral feminist’s brain with two simple questions:

1. Doesn’t it suck that racist white people, any time they see a black person walking the streets late at night, automatically fear that person because they think black people are more likely to be thugs?  Obvious manifestation of white privilege.

2. Doesn’t it suck that sexist women, any time they see a man walking the streets late at night, automatically fear that person because they think men are more likely to be rapists?  Obvious manifestation of female privilege.

Inspired by a facebook friend who literally wrote a post stating that white privilege is the reason white people often fear black people.

Masterful bait and switch. They’ll never see it coming.

On a more general note, AG illustrates one attack strategy that is effective against whiny, sophistic leftoids making appeals to empty emotion. The leftoid, as a species within which the feminist is a subspecie, has more of her ego invested in her ideology. It is her religion. This is why when leftoids and non-leftoids get in political arguments, it’s typically the non-leftoid making diplomatic half-apologies and concessions. The non-leftoid does not feel as strong an ego attachment to his ideology, because he assesses his value more broadly. The result of this personality difference is an arena of leftoids constantly on the attack, getting their way like children throwing tantrums under the weary authority of amiable parents.

A mocking shiv jab will hurt the leftoid feminist, but it will also cause her to retreat into a shell of platitudinal self-protection, and to ensconce herself in the group hug of trite-minded allies. Better is to flatter the feminist’s self-conception, and when her guard is down to rain a shivstorm of hell upon her vulnerable id. You can stab all day at the hardened ego, but a single killing blow to the id laid bare will send even the most obnoxious femcunts like Amanjaw Marcuntte slinking to dark bedrooms in silent shame and consideration of alternative life paths.

To defeat the leftoid, use their power against them. Shiv on, shiv off.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Feminist Idiocy, Psy Ops | 133 Comments

133 Responses

  1. on July 17, 2013 at 11:03 am Tom

    No, nothing works. They are so stupid and brainwashed that nothing can penetrate their dumb shield. Same concept when a GF who used to let you tie her to the bed and fuck her face has fallen out of love with you for being too beta–it’s over then. Nothing can change her mind. The onslaught of leftoid BS since the Zimmerman verdict has been beyond depressing. Every single hot white female celeb has tweeted her disapproval of the verdict, as if she were in court weighing the evidence and received the judge’s instructions on the law.

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 11:38 am morgan

      i don’t really have the time to bring this up to every moron in my life that feels that way, but it’s interesting the parallels. black man, white youth, suspected wrongdoing, should-have-called-police, etc…

      http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top_stories/490926/jury-finds-roderick-scott-not-guilty/

      also women will not discuss these things rationally. lifelong female friends, women that i can actually deal with, give me things like “i can’t even talk about this with you” when i try to talk to them about sticky issues. i have no off-limits topics, but they’ll hang up on me if i don’t change the subject.

      because they have zero substance or anything to argue with. also the leftist chicks i know are far more racist than non-left. they don’t think so.

      LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 11:38 am everybodyhatesscott

      No, nothing works. They are so stupid and brainwashed that nothing can penetrate their dumb shield.

      Marriage and children can work on the typical lefty. There’s no saving the hardcore feminist though. Ramzpaul had a good video about it but I can’t seem to find it.

      LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 12:11 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozoz

      da other nightz da GBFM had two girlz over
      one of the girls pouty faced at us and say
      “but but but i thought it was just gonna be me! this is a bait-and-swicth!”

      da gbfm say,
      “yes grasshopper, it is a master bait-and-switch–”
      “i wantz you to finger yourself while eating her outz”
      and den
      “i wants her to finger herslef wihle she eat u outz.”
      “a masterbate & switch!”

      lzozoozozozozozo

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 12:16 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozozozo http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2013/07/17/the-great-books-for-men-will-ride-again-the-inversion-of-alpha-beta-the-false-siren-of-dr-helen-smiths-men-on-strike-michelle-malkins-hand-wringing/

        THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN WILL RIDE AGAIN: THE INVERSION OF ALPHA & BETA: THE FALSE SIREN OF DR. HELEN SMITH’S MEN ON STRIKE & Michelle Malkin’s Hand-Wringing

        All men should begin immediately by reading the following books which the central bankers and their fellow churchians hate, fear, and detest:

        0. THE BIBLE
        1. Homer’s Iliad
        2. Homer’s Odyssey
        3. Exodus & Ecclesiastes & The Psalms
        4. Virgil’s Aeneid
        5. Socrates’ Apology
        6. The Book of Matthew & Jefferson’s Bible
        7. Plato’s Repulic
        8. Seneca’s Letters from a Stoic
        9. Aristotle’s Poetics
        10. Dante’s Inferno
        11. The Declaration of Independence
        12. The Constitution
        13. John Milton’s Paradise Lost
        14. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
        15. Newton’s Principia
        16. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations and Theory of Moral Sentiments
        17. Henry David Thoreau’s Walden
        18. Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn (& all of his work)
        19. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
        20. Ludwig von Mises’ A Theory of Money and Credit
        21. F.A. Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom
        22. Herman Melville’s Moby Dick
        23. Einstein’s The Meaning of Relativity
        24. Joseph Campbell’s The Hero With a Thousand Faces and The Power of Myth
        25. Ron Paul’s Revolution & End the Fed
        26. THE BIBLE

        Please note that neither Dr. Helen Smith nor Michelle Malkin ever, ever, ever quote nor acknowledge THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN. Next time you see them, ask them why they never salute our EXALTED FATHERS and our NOBLE HERITAGE and the FOUNDATION OF NATURAL RIGHTS, THE FAMILY, FATHERHOOD, and NATURAL LAW.

        For instance, in her book http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/1594036756

        Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters

        why does Helen Smith never quote Moses nor Genesis nor Jesus who DEFINE MARRIAGE? Why does Helen Smith never quote Genesis?

        13: And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.
        14: And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
        15: And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
        16: Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

        DOES HELEN SMITH NOT REALIZE WHY MEN HAVE BOYCOTTED MARRIAGE? It is because it has been desouled, debauched, and bernankified, robbed of its exalted spirit, and transformed into yet another beenrnekified fraud to transfer assets from men to da beenrkeiified statez zlolzozoz.

        Why does HELEN SMITH never quote Moses? Did not Moses know a thing or two about BEING A MAN, even though he never negged, nor peacocked nor wore furry hatsz to get some pre-berbebenkiifed butthozlzizol buttcockinzg (which da noeocnths sectreletly tape zlzzoz):

        6 “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.

        7 “You shall have no other gods before[b] me.

        8 “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 9 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 10 but showing love to a thousandgenerations of those who love me and keep my commandments.

        11 “You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.

        12 “Observe the Sabbath day by keeping it holy, as the Lord your God has commanded you. 13 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 14 but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant,nor your ox, your donkey or any of your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns, so that your male and female servants may rest, as you do.15 Remember that you were slaves in Egypt and that the Lord your God brought you out of there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm.Therefore the Lord your God has commanded you to observe the Sabbath day.

        16 “Honor your father and your mother, as the Lord your God has commanded you, so that you may live long and that it may go well with you in the land theLord your God is giving you.

        17 “You shall not murder.

        18 “You shall not commit adultery.

        19 “You shall not steal.

        20 “You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.

        21 “You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife. You shall not set your desire on your neighbor’s house or land, his male or female servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.”

        RIGHT THERE WE SEE THAT “THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOR’S WIVES ASS & THOU SHALT NOT COMMITT ADULTERY” meaning dat it is worng so very worng to buttcock someoenes future potential wife and tape it in sectrievz zlzzlzloozoz

        Why does DR. HELEN SMITH never quote JEsus? 3Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?”4And He answered and said, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE,5and said, ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH’?6“So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.”7They said to Him, “Why then did Moses command to GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY?”8He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way.9“And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.

        So one can see that MOSES JESUS and GENESIS all agree dat der is to be no sectirve tapings of butthxte nor any transfer of a man’s welath to da beernnake state nor shall any other man be allwedz allowedz to buttcock nor ginacock your wifez. WHY DOES HELEN SMITH NOT QUOTE MOSES, NOR JESUS, NOR GENESIS? lzozoz DOES SHE NOT SEE THAT RETURNING TO THE EXALTED PRINCIPLES SET FORTH IN THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN WOULD RESURRECT MARRIAGE?

        Ask the neocons next time you see them–what do they have against the exalted wisdom of MOSES, JESUS, HOMER, and the GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN?

        And as men are reading the Great Books for Men, they must start enacting their principles in the living world, so as to exalt our legal system and universities, for it is not enough to think and read, but virtue is ultimately defined by *action*.

        One of the remarkable things you will learn by READING THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN is the contemporary inversion of Alpha and Beta.

        In THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN, the Alphas were ACHILLES, JESUS, ODYSSEUS, AENEAS (THE PIUS AENEAS), JEFFERSON, WASHINGTON, ADAMS, MADISON, HAMILTON.

        In all too much of pop manosphere and neoconthz culture, the Alphas are teh secrtetive tapers of buttehxt and the negging wearers of furry hatsz. While Odysseus and Christ and Aeneas resisted womanly and worldly temptations, the modern peacockingz neoconcth gamerz buttehxtesz them. Note how while Charlotte Allen of the Weekly Standard refrains from ever speaking of Odysseus or Achilles or Aeneas, she dutifully repeats the lies of sectrieve taperz of buttehxt whose films lost $10,000,000+ on $12,000,000 budgets, thusly fitting the neocons’ definition of “Art” scucucctetehe” and “”manliness” by creating more debt than wealth while butthetxingz.

        MAny churchian commenters at Dalrock’s blog preach that “Women crave exalted, manly, alpha leadership,” and what they mean by “exalted, manly, alpha leadership” is secrteive tapers of buttehxt buttehxting themz, instead of, say, the wisdom of MOSES, JESUS, ODYSSEUS, PAUL, ACHILLES, MISES, AENEAS, HOMER, VIRGIL, AND DANTE. One of the remarkable aspects of Dalrcok’s Christian/Churchian blog is how THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN and Jesus and Moses are constantly under attack as his commenters oft teach that 1) Jesus came not to fulfill the law, but to abolish it so as to sanctify their lust for buttcockingz, 2) The gospel of Jesus is “noise,” 3) High-value men are those who stick their cockasz in other men’s potential wives the most, 4) Homer’s Nobility is Satanic, and 4) Women crave exalted leadership and it is men’s fault that they do not get it: (BREAKING CHURCHIAN NEWS: All evil ever perpetuated by women is a man’s fault. For women naturally crave manly, exalted leadership. Sometimes it appears otherwise, but really, this is just a woman’s way of testing a man to see if he is strong enough to make her butt and gina tingellzlzo simultaneously. For instance, when a woman checks herself into an abortion clinic, by her choice, and has the baby vacuumed out of her womb, by her choice, it is no cause for alarm, as it is just a “shit-test” of the men in her life. Manly men will rise to the occasion, whence her butt and gina will tingle, and they can conceive another bastard out of wedlock, so she can shit-test him again by murdering her baby.)

        To the neoconthz churchiansz Alpha= fornicating forinicating teahcing Jesus came t9 o abolish the law of Moses, now and then reaidng PJMedis, butteockcingz, creating debt, and never, ever, ever talking about THE GRETA BOOKS FOR MENZ nor the CLASSIXCXZ, except to teach that Homer, Virgil, and Dante are Satanic, while their own peakciingz and buttoccking and sectriev tapingz of butthetx is good, true, virtuous.

        Beta traits to the PUA neocncths churchiansz= Honor, Integrity, Restraint, Purity, Valor, Piety, Refusal of Temptations, Duty, Courage

        But in the GREAT BOOKS FOR MENZ, one finds the exact OPPOSITEZ.

        AND HAVE FIATH DAT LONG AFTER DA MISLED, DEBASED, DEBAUCHED RAMBLINGZ OF TH EBUTTCOCKERZ AND NEONCOTH BUTTCOCKERZ HAVE DFDAED TO NAUGHT, CHRIST, MOSES, HOMER AND THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN WILL ONCE AGIAN EXALT THE TRUE ALPHA TRAITS OF HONOR, INTEGRITY, PURITY, CHASTITY, RESTRAINT, AND MORALITY instead of the smelly buctccokingz of teh neoocnth bolshevik communists mooveemnzt.

        DA GBFM REVIEWS HIS FRITS BOOKZ!!! ”Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters Yo YO yo llzooz” lzozozozozo

        http://www.amazon.com/Men-Strike-Boycotting-Fatherhood-ebook/dp/B00APDFXKO/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1370732726&sr=8-1&keywords=marriage+strike

        Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters

        Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters

        Buy from Amazon

        firstsoff i was rather dismayed to knotice some misspleiingz in da titles which should read:

        Menz on Strike: Why Menz r Boycotting Marrying Benenrkiikfied PRe-Buttcocked, Desouledn Womenz, Risking Having der assetsts rapepdd by multi-asscocked womnz, DA Farce of modern Fatherhood attacked by da BERNEKaz TV, and da fiat false American Dream as definedz by da elitez zlzozoozz- and Why It don’t relaly really Matters zlzozozozlz

        Den da next sad sad so very sad thing I noticed about da book for menz titled MEN ON STRIKE is dat just like EVERY OTHER BOOK WRITTEN BY WOMEN FOR MENZ is dat it made no mention of

        HOMER

        nor

        MOSES

        nor JESUS

        nor SOCRTAESZ

        nor MISEZ

        nor VIRGIL

        nor DANTE

        nor JEFFERZONSOZN

        nor HAYEK

        nor ADAM SMITH

        nor JOSEPH CAMPBELL

        nor ACHILLEZ

        nor ODYSSEUSZ

        nor STAR WARS nor THE MATRIX nor BRAVEHEART nor 300

        nor KING LEONIDAS

        nor DAVID form da bible story DAVID VS. GOLAITH

        nor SODOM

        nor GOMMORRAHZ zlzlzolzo

        nor NOAH

        nor WHITMANZ

        nor SHAKESPEAREZ

        nor DA BIBLE

        nor da OLD TESTAMENT

        nor da NEW TESTAMENTZ

        nor any of MY FRIENDZ

        nor any of da GREAT BOOKZ FOR MENZ

        NOR THE FALL OF EVE which launched DA BIBLE nor DA ADULTERY OF HELEN which laucnhed da TORJAN WAR

        as if

        HOMER, MOSES, JESUS, SOCRATES, JEFFERSN, ADAMS, MADISON, WASHINGTON, LEONIDAS, SOCRATES, GALIELEOZ , COPERNICUS, NEWTON

        KNOW ABOSLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT BEING A MAN

        as if ACHILLES KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT HONORZ

        as if DA BIBLE IS COMPLETELY FUCKING USLEFLESS TO MENZ

        HOW MANY MORE FUCKING BOOKZ

        ARE GOING TO BE WRITTEN ABOUT MEN AND FOR MEN

        WHICH FUCKING IGNOREDTHE FUCKIUNG GREAT FUCKING BOOKS FOR FUCKING MENZ???? AND TGUS IGNORE DA CLASSICAL, EXALTED, PUINNACLE, PAARGAON, FORM OF MAN AND EPOIC MANHOODZ?

        lzozlzoozzlzozolzozozozozozooz

        and den when i found out da book made no metion of da GRETA BOKS FOR MENZ

        nor classic epic heoresz which da neococnths hate while they exalt tucker mwax rhmeys with godlmanssnachsz da butcokeekrz in da wekelsy standadrdth lzozozolz

        i got boredz and went and palyed some playatatstaion grand theft autos zlzozoz

        and tunered on da ESPN and picked up a GBFM iliad hoddodyse HOMER JESUS & i texted a bunch of my hotties:

        http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2012/10/31/great-books-for-men-greatbooksformen-gbfm-tm-gb4m-tm-gr8books4men-tm-lzozozozozlzo-tm/

        and i PICKE DUP HOMERZ ILAIDZ AND ODYSSEYZ

        and I EXLATE DIN READING THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN

        WHICH HAVE BEEN BANNED AND BANISHSED

        AND WICH WOMEN CARE NOT FOR

        AS THEY NEVER READ, NOR TALK ABOUT DEM, NOR WRITE BAOUT DEM

        AS THEY COMPLETEYTEY IGNORE THE GREAT BOOKS 4 MENZ

        and den think dat they can write BOOKS FOR MEN

        while completely ignoring da ARHCETYPAL PINNACLES OF HEORIC MANHOODS

        AND DA GREAT BOOKS FOR MENZ!!!!!

        thusly endeth da GBFMZ first book rievewz lzozolzlz

        i hope u ejoyedz it up next i will review da HBO seriez GIRLZ which at least dey get right with da fat fattassed fattie who takez it up da butt form a loser beoryfieerbndsz, so women can get womenz right (as dey feel da buttingzlzozo firts hand zlzooz), but when it comesz to classical, exalted, moral, menz like MOSES ZEUS JESUS SOCTRETATE CICERO CATO SENECAZ leave it to MENZ OKZ? lzlzozoozozozozo

        ZEUS’ LIGHTNING & MOSES’ THUNDER: Da Reason Dey Banned da GREAT BOOKS 4 MENZ is dat da GREAT BOOKZ teach of the true nature of WOMENZ and da HONOR OF MEN.

        IN THE MIDST OF ZEUS’ LIGHTNING & MOSES’ THUNDER

        A LOST GENERATION OF MEN BEHLD DA GBFM IN WONDER.

        AS HE CAME DOWN FROM HIGH OFF THE MOUNTAIN PEAK

        TO DELIVER DA TRUTH & HONOR ALL YOUNG MEN SEEK.

        lzozozozololzoz

        Lots of people talk and few of them know,soul of a woman was created below.
        Every day I work so hard, bringin’ home my hard earned pay, Try to love you baby, but you push me away.-

        LED ZEPPELIN – DAZED AND CONFUSED LYRICS

        Da Reason Dey Banned da GREAT BOOKS 4 MENZ is dat da GREAT BOOKZ teach of the true nature of WOMENZ and da HONOR OF MEN.

        HOMER TEACHES:

        You have to watch out [20] She doesn’t carry off all your treasure. You know what a woman’s heart is like. She wants to enrich the house of the one who weds her, Never mind about her former children And the husband she once loved. Once he’s dead, [25] She doesn’t give any of them a thought. –Homer; Lombardo, Stanley; Murnaghan, Sheila (2010-07-02). Odyssey (Translated & Annotated) (Kindle Locations 6813-6817). Hackett Publishing. Kindle Edition.

        lzozoozozlzozoz dat is because a owmenz is gudied by materialz insticnstinct and mater = mother = matter = material you fanabaoyz zlzloolzolzoz. DA ANCIENTZ KNEW IT–all dat da bernnkeifierz conceal and hidez as tehy d create false LAWS allowing womenz to arbitrarily transfer a man’s property and chirlederen to da state zlzlzlooz!!!

        OK EVERYONEZ!!

        CLASS IS IN SESSION!!!

        IN THE COMMENTS, leave samples and excerpts from the GREAT BOOKZ which teach game!! AND also note how the GREAT BOOKZ they teach thingz GREATER THAN GAME (such as honor and civilizatin and freedom from punnanaizz zlozzoz and freedom form butthext) as there is more to life than being the 27th PUA to game some buttehxt off a modenrz ebebernankifed deousled womenz zlzozolzlzlozlzozoolzolzozlzloz

        HEre is one for starters:

        lzozozlzozozoz

        read homers lodysysyey!! duh!!!!

        homer’s odysysey teaches that if you stand up to womenz you get to FUCK them lzozozozo

        if you don’t stand up to dem dey turn you into pigs

        yes homer was alomst as brrilliaaiant as heartistse lzozozozozo:

        HOMER’S ODYSSEY:

        “‘And I will tell you of all the wicked witchcraft that Circe will
        try to practise upon you. She will mix a mess for you to drink, and
        she will drug the meal with which she makes it, but she will not be
        able to charm you, for the virtue of the herb that I shall give you
        will prevent her spells from working. I will tell you all about it.
        When Circe strikes you with her wand, draw your sword and spring upon
        her as though you were goings to kill her. She will then be frightened
        and will desire you to go to bed with her; on this you must not point
        blank refuse her, for you want her to set your companions free, and
        to take good care also of yourself, but you make her swear solemnly
        by all the blessed that she will plot no further mischief against
        you, or else when she has got you naked she will unman you and make
        you fit for nothing.’ ”

        -http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/odyssey.mb.txt

        zlzozozozozoz

        ANOTHER GREAT PLACE IS IN GENESIES GENEIS IN DA BIBLE:

        16 Unto the woman GOD said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

        is it no wonder sad benerneiannkieirz funded fmeinnisnsmz to deconstruct the GRETA BOOKZ AND CLASSIZCXZ? zlozozzlzol

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 1:24 pm Anon

        This post is *great* and anyone skipping over it should go back and read it carefully. No joke and no homo.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 1:26 pm Mr.magNIFicent1

        #27 – The Culture of Critique.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 1:30 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        zlzolzozozolzlo


        zlzoozozlozolz

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 5:52 pm Judah Ben Hur

        E. Michael Jones looks well dialed in. Thanks for the tip.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 7:09 pm Judah Ben Hur

        “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History” by E. Michael Jones, the fellow in the video below. Apparently the Magnum Opus of such works and also well researched. This guys books are all heavy hitters. I believe Matt King would find this man most interesting.

        LikeLike


    • on July 18, 2013 at 9:07 am Anon

      Piers FAGGOT MOrgan on top of everything else is perpetuating this myth that gorrilla Ranchele spezkdl 3 languages??jakd;

      bulslhit. has anyone herad her do it??? t he left fucking insults our intelligence I won’t take it anymore

      LikeLike


  2. on July 17, 2013 at 11:04 am Tom

    And I would add that none of these beautiful female celebs tweeting pro-Travyon bullshit would feel, or actually *would*, be safe walking in any black neighborhood in the country. No white person wants to get a flat tire or even get stopped at a red light in any black neighborhood, ever, at night, and not even during the day.

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 11:13 am Tom

      On the red light thing, I would further add that I’m a strong man and I know this from experience. I sometimes go through black neighborhoods, which surround both where I work and live. And another thing about these areas: there are always young black males, often two of them on one bicycle, literally playing chicken with you in the street and daring you to hit them. And they are sitting around drinking alcohol in bottles covered with a brown paper bag, at every single intersection. These people have no jobs and receive $900/month for doing nothing from the government (paid for by beta workers like me’s taxes). There are literally 5 to 12 of them everywhere, at all hours, and it is not safe to get a red light. I sit there on high alert literally wondering if I’ll need to run the red light if one of them tries to mug me and planning my explanation to the cop if I were to get pulled over for it. When I was married, did not want my thin, pretty wife ever driving through there alone.

      These facts are incontrovertible and unassailable and it is just maddening how the Cathedral/Illuminati press literally makes an obvious (to red pillers) strenuous effort to try to instruct the sheep otherwise.

      Hollywood is part of it. None one of these hot young 22 year old celebs who have tweeted about how it’s unfair to be a black person in America would be safe or would ever be found in one of these neighborhoods.

      LikeLike


      • on July 19, 2013 at 6:49 pm Hey_Wilber

        Anyone who has lived in Central Florida for any amount of time knows the truth. There was never a doubt Zimmerman was walking. This was just one spore in the petri dish. Anyone remember St. Pete 1996? Same shit, different outrage.

        LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 11:16 am Alec Leamas

      I think that their tweets (I don’t know exactly whom you are talking about) are the price of being left alone to pursue their careers – most of them mouth some vaguely leftist dogma when prompted that they may neither understand (judging by their articulation of it) or believe (judging by their personal behavior). It’s the coin of the realm in Hollywood and shouldn’t be given much thought, other than the aggregate impact of all of the hot young celebrities all swimming one way at the prompting of some marionettes and the mob has on the political environment in the United States.

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 11:39 am Tom

        http://newsbusters.org/blogs/randy-hall/2013/07/15/celebrity-reactions-zimmerman-verdict-range-hallelujah-my-heart-hurts

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 11:41 am Tom

        http://gossiponthis.com/2013/07/16/kim-kardashian-attacked-twitter-trayvon-martin-statement/

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 7:01 am Ryan Vann

        Nah man, the majority of these twats were proper leftists undoubtedly. A funny one I noticed was from Judge Apatow though. It says a lot in very few words when you think of it. He simply stated “He will wind up in jail soon anyway when he tries to get his memorabilia and Jersey’s back.”

        LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 1:15 pm Anon

      CH the UK beauty winner indeed is beautiful!

      LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 5:12 pm dufus maximus

      We should have never brought them here. <— This is another great line to use on libshits if blacks ever come up in a conversation. A white race realist will just say, "Fuck yeah, we shouldn't have!" but a libshit will be literally struck dumb. The preening limpwristed status-whoring mental disorder known as progressivism is vulnerable to these sorts of unanswerable conundrums because progressivism is a phony belief system, full of self-annihilating contradictions, Hegel dialectical style.

      LikeLike


  3. on July 17, 2013 at 11:11 am Socialkenny

    This is deep as far as the 2 questions go. I mean, how the hell do we address them lol!? I’m frazzled at the thought alone of trying to rebut, refute or put forth an argument.

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 5:17 pm dufus maximus

      Whites should have never brought you here, don’t you agree, sir?

      LikeLike


  4. on July 17, 2013 at 11:13 am Socialkenny

    @Tom- That’s a pretty Beta-male thing to say in your last comment. Unless you’re addressing that from a feminist or white female’s perspective. If that’s how you feel, then I’m sorry for you dude. You’re giving black guys like me more power and reason to gloat 🙂

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 11:19 am Tom

      It’s very simple, Kenny: black people are free to walk anywhere on this Earth, including in white neighborhoods and countries (where, of course, they fight to get in, despite all their bitching). White people are most certainly not safe walking in a black neighborhood. Doing so is literally like voluntarily going swimming with a bunch of sharks and just hoping you won’t get attacked. That is simply reality. Your response betrays, in fact, your macho thuggish outlook. That’s not a reason to gloat; it’s a reason to be ashamed of your race.

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 1:35 pm chi-town

        I would not say that is true. They don’t get it because its not safe for them either. So they wonder what the problem is. I would say black on white crime usually isn’t racially motivated. They just commit crime at a much higher rate and tolerate and forgive it. What they don’t understand is how we don’t give a shit. We used to fry up white criminals for brunch. Whites take out nonconformity and blacks don’t. Sure there is that race thing now and then, but mostly its just that crime in general is more tolerated by blacks. You think a black neighborhood is calling about lawn ordinance violations on their neighbors? That’s standard procedure in the burbs.

        Hell most of the racial problem in this country is white on white. Whites accuse other whites for being nonconformist in the current white guilt culture.

        This is just an all around human malfunction where humans are not socially or genetically prepared to deal with what we are throwing at it.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:16 pm Hugh G. Rection

        They do mostly steal from and kill each other. But the stuff they steal or rob or kill over, I wonder who paid for that?

        LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 5:14 pm dufus maximus

      @Socialkenny – We should have never brought you here, bra. Don’t you agree?

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 9:11 pm thwack

        I have a 8 inch clit

        LikeLike


  5. on July 17, 2013 at 11:16 am feministx

    I think there is only minimal cognitive dissonance produced by the fact that whites fear blacks and women fear men for leftoids. Whites fear blacks because of privilege and stereotyping. Women fear men because of historical oppression. Leftoids do not have a problem with who fears who here. They just think the Opressed Group’s fear is justified while the Hegemon Establishment group’s fear is not justified.

    The delusional ones here are the fringe minority of men’s rights activists who swear up and down that women are as violent to men as men are to women. Many feminists do not even argue with that assertion because it is gender egalitarian. This is pretty tough to believe to me given that men are more likely to commit every other category of violent crime. Women may commit more child abuse but one must consider that women spend 10 times more time with children than men.

    [CH: You’re not getting the point. It’s using the feminist’s words against her. That’s what sows the seeds of confusion. Once she’s babbling about this or that exception to the principle, like you are doing here, she’s lost.]

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 11:20 am Alec Leamas

      Whites fear blacks because menacing, antisocial behavior, and a high frequency of criminality cause fear in the minds of reasonable people. Whites tend not to have much of a problem at all with blacks who act appropriately and appear as if they have something to lose and therefore less desire to act criminally.

      LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 11:22 am Tom

      “Whites fear blacks because of ‘privilege’.” What the fuck does that mean??!?!????

      What is this “privilege” and how would that affect the very real reality that a white person is not safe walking in a black neighborhood.

      By the way, when I’m walking down the street in my sharp suit, nicely groomed, I can bet you that women don’t fear me. Women fear dirty, loud black homeless men, not men who look like they could be in a Men’s Wearhouse commercial.

      I’m not saying they all want to have sex with me, but they don’t fear me.

      I do private consultations all the time in my office with women and they never mind having the door closed and they have no fear of me at all.

      It is very obvious who is a civilized white man and who is dangerous.

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:06 pm corvinus

        So-called “white privilege” happens because white people don’t routinely shoot each other, try to do well in school and to find work, and try to keep intact families.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 4:00 pm itsme

        you guys are still taking femx srsly?

        she’s trolling for attention, plus she wants the lotsa mandingo cockas lolzolzozlzolz

        black on brown rape (accusation), think it will get some headlines??

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 4:12 pm corvinus

        We can go further than that:

        “you guys are still taking femx any woman srsly?

        she’s trolling for attention, plus she wants the lotsa mandingo cockas lolzolzozlzolz”

        LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 11:56 am newlyaloof

      Whites fear blacks because of privilege

      So you admit whites fear black folks then feministx? Are you white? If you are white, do you have this fear too? Cloaking such fear under the “privilege” literary umbrella doesn’t magically make your fear socially-superior to a Zimmerman with the same experience-based precaution.

      LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 12:24 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozl imaganiez dat heartietez! a woman not grapsing da abstract principlez of a logical exercizesz!! lzozozo

      [CH: You’re not getting the point. It’s using the feminist’s words against her. That’s what sows the seeds of confusion. Once she’s babbling about this or that exception to the principle, like you are doing here, she’s lost.]

      dis is why da renaisanancez will take a long, long timez with hamsters and owoemnez running culture (Whcih is da way da bankekersz want itz) as we womenz are immunez to logic and reaosnz zlzlzoz

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:07 pm corvinus

        Right. Women are ruled by their gina tingles and butt tingles. You don’t reason with women. You alpha them.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:08 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        zlzoozozzozo

        the heart and soul of GAME: women are ruled primarily but butt and gina tinglelzlzlzo, while men are ruled by honor, integrity, and the exalted honor codes set down in THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MENZ zlzlzlzlzl

        lzozozozozozoozo

        women are governed chiefly by butt and gina tingelelzozlolzozzo

        GREAT MEN and thsose who penned da GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN were governemned by HEROIC CODES OF HONORz lzozozoz throughout history men have created CIVILIZATION and the insititution of MARRIAGE based on the MYTH of ONE MAN ONE WOMEN.

        asking why women flake is like asking like “why does it rain sometimes in da summerz?”

        as we live in a society which attacksz traditional codes of honor so as to transfer assettz form menz to womenz (aka the banker cartel elite who must conevrt tehir fiat worthless debt into physical goodz and peroperty), we live in a society governed more and more by butt and gina tinzizzglelzozo and less and less by da GRETA BOOKS FOR MENZ and the VIURTUOYS SOUL.

        this is how da eberenekfieieferz want it as they see WESTERN CIVILIZATION and MORALITY as an affront to their dishonorable quest to conevert qorthless book entries into power and physcial peorperteierzz lzozolzlzoz

        and so they deocnstructed THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MENZ

        and created a world rueld by BUTT AND GUINA TINEGELZOOZOZZ

        and to the degree gamers act so as to inspire BUTT AND GINA TINGELEOZOZLZOZ they too are ruled by BUTT AND GINA TINGELEZOZOZOZOZ but hey i undestertatsnd da need to dip da wick and get da pekcer wet, without losing ones’ life liveliehood, liberty, and happienenesz zlzlzlozoozozzoozo

        lzozoozozozozozo

        3 EZ STEPZ: How 2 Handle FLakesz and Flakey Flakerz in da ERA of da TEXT MESSAGE attention whorez zlzlzozozz

        dis is from hearteites blog on FLAKEY FLAKE ERA WE LIVEZ IN where everyone flakes zlzozozoozoz while da gbfm sits at home and waits for da chcix who cflaked flaked on your asssss lzozozzolzolzol:::

        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/10/29/the-age-of-flakes/#comment-38162

        how 2 counter da flakey flakesz in THREE EZ STEPZ

        1. 9 PM: da gbfm sends out a mass text 2 all my ladies:

        “lotsa cocksa 4 u lzozlzlz.”

        da gbfm then gets back dozens of messages:

        lol
        wtf

        ok
        haha
        ???

        kewl
        wat?

        2. da gbfm waits and hour and sends out to everyone again:

        10 PM: “srry wrng #”

        da gbfm then gets back lotsa texts

        awwww
        lol
        too bad
        u got my hopes up
        damn you

        ur loss

        3. da gbfm then waits ’til midnight and texts to everyone:

        12 Midnightz: my place 30 min.

        den da gbfm sits back and watches the parade arriving on his door camera monitor while he watches da espn highlights and reads homer’s odyssey. ding-dog ding-dong they ring da gbfm bell one by one hoping to touch da gbfm’s ding-dong zlzozozzozololzollzo but if they are under an 8 da gbfm just ignorez & reads his boookz zlzozoolzz

        at 1 am a hot hottie shows up and da gbfm hits the buzzer and lets her up.

        da gbfm saves lotsas times and money while the betas liquor her up at the bars and da gbfm gets to hang out with homer instaead of goldidggers and douchetard boobie-men manboobz at all the clubs these days lzlzllzlzl

        PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do nottry this on your own as da GBFM needz you out there buying them drinkz all night and getting them dinnerz as i don’t want no hos eating my puizzaaa and heinekinz beerz!!!! we all have our part in this so please please respect yo!!!!! lzozolzolozzzz

        lozozozozozo

        lzozozozo

        remember dat 80% of all divorces are initiated by womenz as womenz lsisten primarily to tehir butt and gina tingeleozozozo and vows mean nothing to them.

        those societies whihc place matriarchiaes and womenz at the center of their worlds never transcenedned da base female butt and gina tingelelzozozo–they never invented cars nor computers nor disocvered electctricicty nor the atom, because womenz giana and butt teiznzgleolozo tingzlzlo were set off by thigsz and buttehxtheteteras and sectriev tapers of butetehxtzz.

        one can witness this happeingz in any english department where womenz are presentz.

        as soon as they get tehre all teh GRETA BOOSKZ FOR MENZ are edeocnstructed–all the honroo and peotry and exlated psieirirt and soul are tossed out da winedwosz, and one is left with ginatalk gin gina gina gender me me eme vicctime cvicicimt butt ingle gina tingel clit lit twat talk lzlzozoz butetehxing buetetxhting.

        this is WHY THE FED empowered womenz–to detsory poretryr righstz and hgonro and da code of honor as the fED and WOEMZNZ cashe dout on maiiririrage gutting it of its soul as they tejprrorarily prrofieted via dicorveerce and alilaomaoenies and shicicldd support and drugged the fatherleless chcieldnderz up and deumdbded tehm downenenz zlzlzozozoozzozozooz

        LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 1:02 pm Traveller

      Bull

      When you kill your newborn because you have “depression post partum” how much time did you spent with him?

      LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 1:52 pm chi-town

      Listen to this in stereo: stereotyping is a knock off of using anecdotal evidence. Cutting across violent black neighborhoods so that you don’t over cook the rice is a statistical gamble. Most crackers and rice eaters eat the mush.

      Women on the other hand have a dangerous taste for beef still on the hoof. And no women are not as violent as men. They just stage the rooster fights, fuck the winners, and raise their precious, psychopathic brain stems and a 250lb drive train of violent meat . Every dirt bag, scalp collector has his mama behind him screaming “don’t hurt my baby.”

      No no, women are not sharks….they just stock da pond wit em.

      LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 2:04 pm Jack

      What historical oppression? The entire history of the human species can be summed up with a picture of a man carrying a woman on his shoulders. What feminists refer to as oppression is the gratitude that men have always expected to receive for their provider and protector role. There has never been any oppression of women. That’s a lesbian myth.

      [CH: Femx is an unwitting beneficiary of the fundamental premise. Did you expect honesty or self-awareness from such a corrupted creature?]

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 5:44 pm feministx

        According to you all women are beneficiaries of the fundamental premise (which I don’t believe in). Are all beneficiaries of this premise corrupted creatures? Or is it just me for some reason?

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 6:46 pm chi-town

        You never needed to find out. And there is your answer.

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 10:16 am feministx

        I don’t understand. All of us beneficiaries of fundamental premise are corrupted creatures, or I am a specially corrupted creature?

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 10:17 am CH

        Both.

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 10:30 am feministx

        Very well, Mr. Heartiste. CorruptedCreatureX sends you so many many e-kisses that you could feel as spoiled rotten as the universe made me.

        LikeLike


  6. on July 17, 2013 at 11:21 am Southern Man

    To play mind games with a feminist, they must first have a functioning mind. Most do not. Rational argument and logic are beyond them; analogies such as this are utterly lost on them. Best to ignore them and go flirt with the nearest foreign girl.

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 11:24 am Tom

      Exactly what I’m saying, said more concisely. Cannot argue logic with a woman or leftoid, which is the same thing. Even regular CH reader FemX betrays massive stupidity about once every 3 days, such as her post above.

      LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 11:50 am feministx

      That is actually exactly what I was saying. I was not offering my own opinions of fear of black. I was merely paraphrasing the leftist perspective on fear of black people in my post.

      But that is what I mean- the analogy is only effective on people who are capable of changing their minds based on rational argument and evidence. Hence, I am not convinced that this mind game is actually effective.

      As for my actual opinion of black violence, no opinion is even necessary. Facts are what they are. I am told that the rate of black violence is so high that black females are actually more likely to commit a number of violent crimes than white men. And that is just white men, who are not even the least violent of races as East Asian men are even less prone to violence. Remarkably, we in the US probably do not even have exposure to the most violent subgroups of blacks, who are probably the bantu that live in central and south sub Saharan Africa.

      I fear all men. Am I crazy? No problem with being in an office with a guy alone, but I could not spend time in a residence alone with a guy alone.

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 11:59 am ; )

        Your fear men from brainwashing. Rape by a stranger happens very, very rarely in the United States. The law’s “deterrence” rationale–I was a criminal justice minor–works! Men are rightly afraid that they’ll get arrested and put in jail and become the rapee if they rape a woman. They even fear getting falsely accused, yet Rappacini’s Daughter’s post in last thread about how we are supposed to magically read signals shows what we face. Man still has to make the moves, not knowing if “no means no” lzozlzozozlz. Most “rape” indeed is “date rape” and most of that is not even rape; rather it’s the woman feeling regret the next morning and rationalizing it as rape.

        Very very very rare that a strange boogie man would rape a stranger. Very rare inside marriage and relationships too. Most men are betas, and when they get in a fight with their GF or wife, what do they do? Do they rape you? No, they roll over and go to sleep and stew or pout.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 1:10 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        You’re correct that the stranger-leaping-out-of-the-bushes type of rape is relatively rare, and that most rapes are perpetrated by acquaintances. However, you’re wrong that determining when to stop is difficult.

        I may be opaque about what I do want, but I’m quite good at being emphatic about what I don’t want. When I say “no,” you’re not going to have any questions about whether I mean it.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:02 pm feministx

        “They even fear getting falsely accused, yet Rappacini’s Daughter’s post in last thread about how we are supposed to magically read signals shows what we face. ”

        I can’t perfectly tell who can read what, and I know I am a very passive personality, so I just avoid messes altogether by never being alone with a guy (offices not counted).

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:06 pm Jack

        So you’re celibate?

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 7:21 am cynthia

        I think the “read my signals” thing is a bit more immediate. “Can’t he tell I want him to kiss me now?” “Can’t he tell I want him to go for my panties?” “OMG, can’t he tell that my statements of ‘I should really go feed my cat’ are code for stop?”

        (But seriously, guys, if a woman is ever giving you lame excuses for why she doesn’t want your hand there, best to assume she’s telling you no. This, I think, is where most of those regret sex/rape accusations come from. I’d bet feministx is guilty of that herself)

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 8:26 am feministx

        Um no. I’ve never accused anyone of any kind of rape, nor have I felt the sentiment that I had been taken advantage of unfairly.

        But i have experienced plenty of strong physical aggression from guys wanting it, so I don’t want to be in a situation where I really have to fight that off.

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 8:28 am feministx

        By taken advantage unfairly, I am only referring to non- boyfriends.

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 10:55 am cynthia

        @feministx – didn’t mean to imply you’d falsely accused a man of rape. More that you seem the type who’d be too timid to forcefully say no or fear it turning physical if you did. I know what you mean, though. Last time a guy I’d gone out with slammed me into a wall at my apartment and wouldn’t back off, I promised myself I wouldn’t put myself in that situation ever again. (Managed to get him out without anything happening, but it was really scary)

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 11:42 am feministx

        Ok, thanks for clarifying. You are right- that’s what I meant.

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 1:27 pm cynthia

        There’s something in the female brain that makes it very, very difficult to tell a guy no once things get going. It actually pisses me off – we live in a world where this is an essential skill for surviving the Wstern sexual experience, but we neither tell little girls that this is part of their psychology, nor equip them in any way to address it in themselves. It’s no wonder so many girls think they’ve been raped.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 12:01 pm Tom

        I would add that black mothers (average weight–300 pounds; average meal fed to herself and her children–2,000 calories at McDonald’s) are *very* violent to their children, especially boys, so it’s a vicious cycle of violence that they teach themselves.

        To see this in action, walk into any McDonald’s in an urban area. Black mothers are downright mean and nasty to their kids.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 12:05 pm Southern Man

        It’s worse than you think. I’ve thrice been the victim of crime that required police involvement. The perps in all three cases were…well, you already know. In two of the three cases, their race was not mentioned on the police report. One of the cops told me that they were under orders to not report race unless absolutely necessary because “the stats on black crime are bad enough already.”

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 10:13 pm thwack

        “the stats on black crime are bad enough already.”
        ————————————————————————
        True.

        The system of racism white supremacy has produce only two kinds of black males; Monsters and Monstrosities.

        I’m a monstrosity.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:08 pm corvinus

        I fear all men. Am I crazy? No problem with being in an office with a guy alone, but I could not spend time in a residence alone with a guy alone.

        If the fear comes with love, no, you’re not crazy.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:08 pm Jack

        No, you’re not crazy. You’re just a bigot. Replace the word “men” with “Jews” or anyone else and you’ll begin to realize the depths of your hate.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:51 pm corvinus

        godwin

        LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 2:22 pm chi-town

      Can’t make complex recipes when camping with so few resource. Their brains are like poor Attic soils. Ya roast it on a spear tip. The best way to fuck with a feminist is to tell them you don’t go for that superficial bullshit which is why you like them so much. “I’d rather be here with you right now, not some bimbo hot chick”.

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 9:14 pm Erik Rorrer

        Now that comment sounds like a shiv.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 10:01 pm Subway Masturbator

        There you go. Follow Ovid’s advice: flatter her for what are actually her weaknesses. Women are dolts, so tell her she’s smart, not like
        “other chicks”.

        LikeLike


  7. on July 17, 2013 at 11:33 am cryo

    The most effective mind game to deploy against a feminist is rough, degrading sex followed by radio silence.

    Field tested, mother approved!

    LikeLike


  8. on July 17, 2013 at 11:33 am Days of Broken Arrows

    This idea was written about yesterday by W.F. Price at The Spearhead. My guess is that “AG” got his idea from The Spearhead blog post:

    http://www.the-spearhead.com/2013/07/16/the-trayvon-martin-shooting-and-the-dont-be-that-guy-campaign/

    LikeLike


  9. on July 17, 2013 at 11:36 am Nothingman00

    “The non-leftoid does not feel as strong an ego attachment to his ideology, because he assesses his value more broadly. ”

    Wow, this is very true. Had never thought of this before. It explains why leftoids tend to scream and cry when you start saying things they don’t like

    LikeLike


  10. on July 17, 2013 at 11:36 am The young fogey

    Very good, but you and I know feminists don’t believe that a random man is a rapist. (And he’s probably not.) That line, a distortion of Christianity’s teaching on chastity and respect, is just a way to make screening out betas easier. Guilt them out of coming onto you. I guess the fun with this mind game is watching the feminist go through contortions rather than admit this.

    LikeLike


  11. on July 17, 2013 at 11:42 am Kick a Bitch

    wtf are you guys following dumb bitches on twitter?

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 12:03 pm Tom

      no it was headline news

      LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 10:17 pm madvillain

      Is this the original Kick a Bitch?

      LikeLike


  12. on July 17, 2013 at 12:08 pm Andy

    I take a different approach with feminists. When she feels the tingle it becomes much easier to change her way of thinking. I simply run the usual game, dodge the initial shit tests (if any), put on the cocky and funny act, DHV and if politics come up I’ll wait for her to say something I can disagree with. Then I’ll just disagree outright:

    her: “zomg republicans were mean to Sandra Fluke”
    me: “well you can see their point, she is a grown woman who can afford an elite education, but not a few $ a month for birth control?”

    (though if you’re looking for the bang it’s often wiser to stay away from politics at least until after the bang)

    etc. Sow the seeds of doubt. After a short while you can say outrageously sexist things (GB2kitchen etc) and these women will just giggle and say “oh you”.

    I find it works best with young feminists whose devotion to the sisterhood is hilariously superficial.

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 1:13 pm Harry Morgan

      You can say pretty much whatever you want after you fuck them hard and the contrarianism will just turn them on. I’ve dated a few girls who were fairly feminist, and after fucking them I would joke or make half-joking comments about repealing the 19th amendment, the stupidity of various feminist dogmas, etc.

      If might screw up a lay if used pre-bang, but post-bang I think it puts out a strong signal that her beliefs are not important to you, yours are, and that you are not seeking her approval. They always act indignant about it, but with a sparkle in her eye (and shortly thereafter, a meaty intrusion in her mouth).

      LikeLike


  13. on July 17, 2013 at 12:10 pm Anonymous

    “It is her religion”

    you are beginning to get it.

    LikeLike


  14. on July 17, 2013 at 12:13 pm Rick Derris

    The next time a feminist rolls out the “all men are potential rapists” trope, accuse them of HOMOPHOBIA.

    If all men are potential rapists, then homosexual men are potential rapists.
    A homosexual rapist will rape another man.
    It is rational for a man to fear being raped.
    Therefore, homophobia is rational.

    There! Now you can accuse feminists of gay-bashing.

    LikeLike


  15. on July 17, 2013 at 12:15 pm יהודה בן יוסף

    Faggotry and feminazism used to be illegal here until 1988

    LikeLike


  16. on July 17, 2013 at 12:17 pm Bob Wallace

    I don’t debate leftists. I just insult them. The best one I’ve heard recently: talking to a leftist is like playing chess with a chicken: no matter how good you are, the chicken will knock the pieces over, crap all over the board, then strut around squawking like it’s won.

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 12:35 pm tj

      coffee spewage

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 1:06 pm Bob Wallace

        I have memorized a few stock answers to drive liberals insane. Here’s another one: “You know what’s black on top and white on the bottom?” “Rape.”

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 1:41 pm Maya

        😀

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:16 pm Maya

        Am I a racist because I find this funny?

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:34 pm Hugh G. Rection

        “What’s long and black?” “The unemployment line. “

        LikeLike


  17. on July 17, 2013 at 12:31 pm Anonymous

    Have you seen http://www.everydaysexism.com/ ?

    It’s seems to be a project about feeling sorry for women who were either looked at or experienced a man who awkwardly hit on her, because most stories are like that.

    LikeLike


  18. on July 17, 2013 at 12:50 pm Anonymous

    This might work on a beta-male tentatively mimicking feminists for acceptance, but most likely not on any male or female who is really committed to the cause. Proving them wrong through reason and logic only serves as evidence for them that you are “heartless,” “mean spirited” or whatever. If they cared about reason and logic, they would not be feminists … for very long anyway.

    Another note is that with my very recent experience in a college Women’s Studies class, the instructor made a good effort to point out that it is irrational to fear that man in the dark parking lot any more than a woman. Of course this was connected to the egalitarian philosophy that men and women are not really that different and women can be just as aggressive and violent as men. I considered it a good sign.

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 2:42 pm Hugh G. Rection

      That sounds retarded. Being afraid is not a rational choice. So saying a certain “fear” is irrational is completely missing the point. Especially given how it absolves people from irresponsible behavior.

      “She shouldn’t have feared the rapist. He shouldn’t have raped her”. Doesn’t change the fact.

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 7:52 pm Anonymous

        The point isn’t that all fear is rational, but that fear can be taught and that women have been taught to fear strange men more than they have been taught to fear strange women. She was making a point that men are unfairly stigmatized as violent and profiled as a likely rapist, murderer etc …

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 2:29 am Hugh G. Rection

        It’s common sense that a strange man can be more dangerous than a strange woman. The stats prove it. Fairness doesn’t play into it.

        LikeLike


  19. on July 17, 2013 at 1:02 pm derthal

    OT: Sign petition to repeal the BILL OF RIGHTS
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0he0cqHH20

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 1:30 pm Mr.magNIFicent1

      It’s already done. They call it “The Civil Rights Act”, which was in fact the abolition of free association. Up is down. USA!!

      LikeLike


  20. on July 17, 2013 at 1:05 pm RappaccinisDaughter

    I just tell them rape and spousal-abuse jokes. It’s fun because according to their own rules I can say whatever I want…if they call the ThoughtPolice on me, they might get arrested too.

    Q: What do you tell a woman who has two black eyes?
    A: Nothing! You already told her twice!

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 1:15 pm Anon

      See, as a man born in 1975, I don’t think that’s funny.

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:09 pm corvinus

        As a man born in 1975 beta SNAG, you wouldn’t.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:26 pm Anon

        Nope, real men don’t believe in violence against anyone and don’t need silly jokes like this to find amusement in life.

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 3:56 pm corvinus

        “Nope, real men beta SNAGs don’t believe in violence against anyone and don’t need silly jokes like this to find amusement in life.”

        fify

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:21 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        How many feminists does it take to change a lightbulb?

        THAT’S NOT FUNNY!

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 10:11 pm Subway Masturbator

        No, the answer is “One, and that’s NOT funny.”

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 4:25 pm Mr.magNIFicent1

        …stwowjustwowjustwowju…

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 5:43 pm Bob Wallace

        It is funny. If you have ever encountered a woman who won’t shut up because she thinks you’ll do nothing about it you’d understand it. BTW, jokes are not reality. What is horrible in reality is funny in fantasy. That’s why humor and horror are Siamese twins. Oops, I guess I shouldn’t have Siamese? Thai twins?

        LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 6:14 pm hamster of the gods

        Bullshit! I was born in 1975, and this pussy is not a man. Seriously, why the fuck would you trot that out as something noteworthy? We’re totally better than those ’76 assholes! Don’t even get me started on ’86! You dicks don’t even remember Danzig! Seriously though, what do call a white woman with a black baby? A single mom! Ba-dum Chsssshhhhhh!

        LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 1:33 pm Anonymous

      whats the hardest part when raping a woman?
      trying not to laugh

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 2:21 pm RappaccinisDaughter

        What’s black and blue and doesn’t like sex?
        THE RAPE VICTIM IN MY TRUNK

        LikeLike


      • on July 19, 2013 at 7:10 am AlmostAnonymous

        Both of those made me laugh.

        LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 2:24 pm Maya

      Ahahahaha 😀 This one is perfect 😛

      LikeLike


  21. on July 17, 2013 at 1:06 pm maurice

    trite-minded allies

    heh.

    LikeLike


  22. on July 17, 2013 at 1:17 pm some feminist

    im honestly just very confused by these questions lol

    LikeLike


  23. on July 17, 2013 at 2:19 pm jacquesfelixdouglas

    I like to post unoffensive comments on feminist forums but I write them in a condescending, offensive and very male way. Hinting at misogyny while avoiding saying anything offensive literally drives them insane; they get angry and offended and go off about male privilege (etc. etc.) but because you haven’t given them any real material to counter, they just end up sounding like bigger idiots.

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 2:59 pm cryo

      can you give an example?

      LikeLike


  24. on July 17, 2013 at 2:32 pm Uncle Elmer

    I ripped the lid off the Salon Anti-Racism franchise in today’s Spearhead :

    http://www.the-spearhead.com/2013/07/16/salons-toxic-race-shame

    LikeLike


  25. on July 17, 2013 at 2:57 pm 30words

    This may be the gayest thing ever written on CH- but I’m doing it anyway:

    Is anyone here watching BB live feeds? I would really appreciate a chat room name that was not full of a bunch of thought police bitches.

    LikeLike


  26. on July 17, 2013 at 3:51 pm hamster of the gods

    I want to believe there is a story behind the Marcuntte reference, as I troll her periodically at Slate. The link just goes to her dispiriting visage and deplorable whine-ogrophy.

    LikeLike


  27. on July 17, 2013 at 4:33 pm webe

    I like the quandry waiting for leftoids to fall in when they want to give the native Indians the right to have traditional justice on their own land/reserves, but then are upset when it turns out the council doesn’t admit sqauws and that the children of sqauws are only recognized as Indians (with special benefits) if the man was Indian.

    LikeLike


  28. on July 17, 2013 at 5:15 pm Kate

    I was treated to several instances of what I shall refer to as “feminist face” this weekend. Feminist face is when a feminist crinkles her face in disapproval when another woman has the audacity to talk about her man in complimentary terms. It is an unflattering look.

    [CH: Hah. Classic tell of present and future spinsterhood. Trying to think of the male equivalent of feminist face, but I don’t believe there is one. When a dude effuses righteous about his lady, he’s usually a beta, because usually it’s betas who go in for that kind of public pussy pedestalizing. Men in the company of such a beta might then make “dog poop face” which, as the name implies, is pretty much a look of disgust.]

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 5:32 pm Kate

      LOL

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 7:49 pm alexandrahamilton87

        Unless you are praising him for scrubbing dishes or being a feminist. Then their mouths spout praise and “I wish [uncommitted cad who bangs her on slow weeknights] would be more like that.” But their eyes betray a hint of “dog poop face” nevertheless.

        LikeLike


      • on July 18, 2013 at 6:19 am Kate

        Its getting awfully pretty around here! 🙂

        LikeLike


  29. on July 17, 2013 at 5:23 pm cryo

    “Trying to think of the male equivalent of feminist face”

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 5:26 pm cryo

      Bah, broken link.

      LikeLike


      • on July 17, 2013 at 7:24 pm Dan Fletcher

        Caption: “Wow. Just wow.”

        LikeLike


  30. on July 17, 2013 at 5:53 pm Joe Sixpack

    How to destroy a feminist/pro-abotion Leftist’s brain with two simple questions:

    1. Doesn’t it suck that a woman can get pregnant by a man and, afterwards, she has the full authority and discretion as to whether that child will be born? I mean, she can choose at any time to pay $500 to have an abortion and the father of the baby has absolutely no say whatsoever. Isn’t that unfair?

    2. What if we were to pass a law that says any man who impregnates a woman, may, at any time before the baby is born, pay a $500 penalty to the State which absolves him of all present and future financial obligations to both the mother and child?

    Then grill some burgers, crack a beer, pull up a lawn chair and watch the feministrage hilarity ensue.

    LikeLike


    • on July 18, 2013 at 10:58 am cynthia

      See, you’re assuming logic is part of the subroutines. This might piss a feminist off, but force her to confront her own intellectual hypocrisy? Hardly.

      LikeLike


  31. on July 17, 2013 at 7:46 pm Anonymous

    Leftists always have a way to justify their beliefs. You see black people don’t really commit more crime. They are just unfairly targeted by the police, so the statistics show a falsely higher rate. On the other hand, men most definitely rape more. Just look at all the surveys of women claiming that they have been raped.

    LikeLike


  32. on July 17, 2013 at 8:00 pm Playing Mind Games With Feminists « PUA Central

    […] Playing Mind Games With Feminists […]

    LikeLike


  33. on July 17, 2013 at 8:23 pm Goblincock

    Remember when “skeptic” Rebecca Watson got upset over being propositioned on an elevator? A bunch of whiny blue-pill skeptics came out and said all men are ‘potential rapists’. Somebody on /r/Skeptic made a post saying that they are afraid to get on elevators with Black people because all black men are potential thieves. The hamestering going on in that thread was delicious.

    LikeLike


    • on July 18, 2013 at 6:08 pm pimps_up

      link? I would love to see this!

      LikeLike


  34. on July 17, 2013 at 8:46 pm Dan Fletcher

    If you really want to see the leftoid hamster spin, do the following:

    1. Go to mangina filled website such as Reddit.
    2. Type out a comment containing some form of red pill truth. Don’t press submit yet!
    3. To your comment, add “As a black man….” or “…and that’s coming from a women!” as appropriate. Just that extra bit will let the comment slip through the political-correctness mental filter.

    Great way to disseminate truths, if that’s what you’re into.

    LikeLike


    • on July 17, 2013 at 10:43 pm whorefinder

      Dan, agreed. One thing I’ve always liked about black sitcoms is that they are able to explore masculine areas that non-black sitcoms ignore or ridicule—loss of male power in the household; men being in charge of their home; women submitting to men, etc. The black sitcom Singles from the 1990s had an excellent storyline where a bitchy, career woman is brought low to a smooth but non-playa guy—the audience, mostly women, used to cheer when he put her in her place.

      Too bad it was for subhumans. Oh well. Rape!

      LikeLike


  35. on July 18, 2013 at 5:38 am Moose

    You can never convince a feminist of anything, but you can convince a human. This could help to differentiate between the two.

    LikeLike


  36. on July 18, 2013 at 11:41 am Anonymous

    The ‘women treat any man as a potential rapist’ argument originated here: http://kateharding.net/2009/10/08/guest-blogger-starling-schrodinger%E2%80%99s-rapist-or-a-guy%E2%80%99s-guide-to-approaching-strange-women-without-being-maced/ Pointing out that the same logic would require black people to be aware that white people find them threatening is usually called ‘schroedinger’s mugger.’

    LikeLike


  37. on July 18, 2013 at 11:43 am Adam

    “The leftoid, as a species within which the feminist is a subspecie, has more of her ego invested in her ideology. It is her religion. This is why when leftoids and non-leftoids get in political arguments, it’s typically the non-leftoid making diplomatic half-apologies and concessions. The non-leftoid does not feel as strong an ego attachment to his ideology, because he assesses his value more broadly. The result of this personality difference is an arena of leftoids constantly on the attack, getting their way like children throwing tantrums under the weary authority of amiable parents.”

    “The greatness of every mighty organization embodying an idea in this world lies in the religious fanaticism and intolerance with which, fanatically convinced of its own right, it intolerantly imposes its will against all others. If an idea in itself is sound and, thus armed, takes up a struggle on this earth, it is unconquerable and every persecution will only add to its inner strength.”

    -Mein Kampf 1:12

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    John Joel Glanton on Keyser Sayoc Update
    clarence boddiker on Sigh Ops
    UndertheDRADIS on Measuring The Health Of N…
    UndertheDRADIS on Measuring The Health Of N…
    Bucky on Sigh Ops
    Discipline on Exploiting The Lunatic Fringe…
    Greg Eliot on Exploiting The Lunatic Fringe…
    Greg Eliot on State Of The State Depart…
    Discipline on Exploiting The Lunatic Fringe…
    Discipline on Exploiting The Lunatic Fringe…
  • Top Posts

    • Exploiting The Lunatic Fringe To Silence Legitimate Dissent
    • Comment Of The Week: The Left's Cultural Reign Is Over
    • State Of The State Department
    • Measuring The Health Of Nationhood
    • Keyser Sayoc Update
    • Sigh Ops
    • Cesar Sayoc, "White Male" (& Deep State Updates)
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: