• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Desperate Male Of The Month
14 Things No One Will Tell Fat Girls… So I Will »

When Alpha Males Square Off

January 7, 2014 by CH

Can you spot the alpha-iest alpha who ever alpha’ed?

A hushed crowd gathers at a safe distance round the two great white beasts… lords of their jungles… locked in a struggle predetermined by ancient custom and cosmic law. They slowly circle, gazes unwavering, searching for a flash of weakness in cold orbs of blue ice that have seen much. Stalking and circling, bodies taught under the veneer of custom suits and polite banter, prepared to spring to action. Their minds electrified with the weight of the rapprochement, jowls flaring a crimson warning. The winner will acquire mating rights to the loser’s concubines, and oh my is that a lot of concubines. The women on the losing side will wail and gnash their teeth, but only for a moment before regrouping and surrendering with barely concealed relief and joy to the carnal caretaking of the new king…

It’s just a snapshot of two human silverbacks in the wild, but these frozen totems at the pinnacle of their male power give us clues to the subtle undercurrents of intention and the restrained but fraught posturing that accompanies the spectacle of an alpha male face-off. It doesn’t happen often — super alpha males tend to give each other a wide berth in their natural habitats — so when a direct clash of caliphs does happen it’s occasion to clear the arena for a primetime show.

Both of these potentates have strong alpha male body language. You would expect nothing less than ramrod straight backs, squared shoulders and jutting chins from two men who are accustomed to ordering successful assassinations and plowing ass ten to a bed. Their faces are expressionless, void of the slightest twinkle of a smile in the eyes or mouth, and this too is expected when two high status men, trained by decades of accumulating a mountain of lessers and climbing over their prostrate souls, confront one another and must ascertain the other’s sentiment without revealing clues to their own emotional state. Wry smiles are affordable when one’s potential antagonist is a beta male; such an amiable gesture signals a vulnerability that the high status can easily indulge. But on the battlefield of equals, the crowd unsure which prince to line up behind, the smile is stashed lest the men risk an accidental tell of submission.

For a deeper analysis, we need to locate small details that evade cursory examination. Eye contact is important here. Putin is locked like a polonium-tipped bullet on DiCaprio’s eyes. His stare communicates, if a communique can be discerned, that he is alternately bored by this dog and pony show and pleased with the passing thought that he could… radically alter… Leo’s life trajectory with a word.

DiCaprio’s eyes, unfortunately, are obscured by the camera angle, so we can’t know if he’s meeting Putin’s pupils or looking askance as Putin sizes him up. We’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and say the former.

Super Alpha Male Score (SAMS) so far: Putin 1, DiCaprio 1.

Putin is not a tall man. Yet in every photo of him, he appears capable of adeptly adjusting his posture and gaze in the company of taller men. The proof of this is that you hardly ever see a picture of Putin and immediately think “Damn, he’s a short man.” He leaves a taller impression on the viewer. DiCaprio has natural gravitas due to his relative height, an advantage which Putin must neutralize. And he does, with a jaunty cock of the head and careful refusal to raise his chin too high to accommodate DiCaprio’s elevated presence. For this impressive feat, we must award Putin.

SAMS: Putin 2, DiCaprio 1.

Sadly, as the CH giveth, the CH taketh away. Note Putin’s drink; he’s holding that snifter too high up his torso, a classic  habit of defensiveness. Keep that drink by your waist, Comrade!

SAMS: Putin 2, DiCaprio 2.

Putin’s face seems more relaxed, but his carriage more tense. DiCaprio appears a little more relaxed throughout the shoulders and upper back. Leo’s brow is more knitted, though, which gives him the look of a man who is trying too hard to appear tough, or who is struggling with constipation. This one’s a wash.

SAMS: Putin 2, DiCaprio 2.

Now what? When direct comparison is limited, we turn to the adoring gaze of the crowd. The alpha male is as much a creation of the perceptions of the people who eagerly draft in his wake as he is a locus of his own alphaness. This crowd is fixed on DiCaprio. Putin may as well be another gawker.

If we stop here, and it would be reasonable to do so, the winner of the Super Alpha Male Square Off can be declared.

SAMS: Putin 2, DiCaprio 3.

Not much more to say, you say? Hold on, CH judges are privy to documents and dossiers that alter the complexion of the proceedings. We are fairly certain that DiCaprio has never slyly called out the ethnic composition of the first Soviet government and trolled the entirety of the Western world’s media.

SAMS: Putin: Irrepressible chutzpah, DiCaprio: Fancyboy.

Vlad, your trophy has been delivered to your country estate.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Alpha | 418 Comments

418 Responses

  1. on January 7, 2014 at 2:29 pm TRr

    Alpha fux Alpha Fux

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:15 pm son goku

      I wouldn’t be afraid with any of those alpha males, i am a White belt in Taekwondo.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on January 7, 2014 at 4:26 pm irishsavant

      CH, your prose is so good it’s more like poetry.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 3:55 am jez

        Including the “taught” bodies in the first para.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 11:52 am irishsavant

        touché!

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 5:23 pm Mitch Cumstein

        Goddamnit Heartiste, you use your tongue prettier than a 20 dollar whore…

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 9:24 am ain't nuttin but a gansta partayyy

      a search on google of this picture has titles stating “Putin states Dicaprio is ‘Real Man'”

      may only have to do with the tigers though who knows

      LikeLike


  2. on January 7, 2014 at 2:30 pm Kate

    Putin On the Ritz!

    (Why are they surrounded by Indians?)

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 2:40 pm Greg Eliot

      I knew General Custer… and frankly, Di Caprio… you’re no Custer.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:18 pm Arbiter

        Hilarious!

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 7:04 pm Sakura Haruno

        Not a big fan of Russians, they and the Chinese are like a Lord Voldemort who are threat to global peace.

        http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/06/japan-china-voldemort-harry-potter

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 10:30 pm Inane Rambler (@UnendImprov)

        Neocon alert!

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 11:58 am CarpeOro

        I believe the name of that user is female. Could be wrong, but would explain a bit.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 5:28 pm ballsweatsoop

      It actually looks to me like the crowd has consolidated behind Putin and is staring at Dicaprio to see whether he melts down in the face of their warrior hero.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:10 am Jay in DC

        You see too much sir. Getting brown folk behind you if you are blue eyed blonde and a leader of men has been the game for well— forever. Every country that tried to throw off the “shackles” of such leaders paid the price. Only in the upside down 21st century is this a bad thing.

        A short list, for your perusement— Rhodesia, Haiti, Liberia, South Africa– just for starters. Do a little google search and you will find out how awesome other countries have also become after the world striding imperalists, the British of the 18th-20th century, became after their departure. It ain’t pretty brah—

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 8:12 am thwack

        You left out Tarzan.

        LORD of the APES.

        Yo mamma black!

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 11:59 am Greg Eliot

        Thwack say:

        “Boy” is somebody who hangs around in the jungle with Tarzan… and the next time I hear you calling him, he better be around!

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 9:02 am The Spirit Within

        Do your own Google search, Jay in DC, and you’ll see that the British were never in Liberia. It was founded by black Americans, and was apparently a decent place to live until it went to complete shit in the 80s. The British also were never in Haiti in any great numbers.

        And I guess that Brazil really should’ve stayed a European colony … such a failure that country is. /sarcasm

        I imagine you work at the Heritage Foundation.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 11:20 am Zombie Shane

        > “I imagine you work at the Heritage Foundation.”

        Do y’all consider that to be some sort of an insult, down there at Temple Beth El, on Saturdays?

        LOL’ed.

        C’mon, man, you can do better than that.

        I have faith in you.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 5:38 pm ballsweatsoop

        I imagine you are, like, someone who knows a lot of math…

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 2:55 pm Carlos Danger

        He didn’t really say that about either place. You inferred it. -2 points for being a peenie ween.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 5:37 pm ballsweatsoop

        You see too much sir. Getting brown folk behind you if you are blue eyed blonde and a leader of men has been the game for well— forever.

        So, you are confirming that they are “behind” Putin?

        What’s all the other passive-aggressive gibberish in your post? I wasn’t trying to make some grand, meta-theoretic point about anything. Just observing why i thought the darkies were looking in DiCaprio’s direction.

        LikeLike


  3. on January 7, 2014 at 2:30 pm oogaboogaman

    Personally I think Vlad is going to regift his prize. For a movie star DiCaprio did well in this confrontation, but are there any other badass world leaders worthy of competition with Putin?

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 2:44 pm Amy

      That’s probably a better comparison; Leo’s not really a badass type. It’s an interesting comparison from a female attraction perspective though. Putin is old, short, thinning hair… but is MUCH sexier (to me anyway) than Leo the prettyface actor. No contest.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 9:26 pm Joe Blow

        Nancyboy faking convincingly under the klieg lights badass, verses genuine have you drawn and quartered at high noon and personally mutilate and piss on your corpse then and laugh at your country’s impotent and pathetic diplomatic protests badass.

        That we can take seriously a comparison between the two, tells you how warped our standards for success and darwinian fitness have become here in the west.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:21 am retrophoebia

        Fake it til you make it – It’s entirely plausible that Leo believes his own hype and therefore would possess the frame to stand mano-a-mano with the KGB puppet-master, even if he didn’t have the resume to back it up. Not unlike a dark-triad driven playa’.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:27 am FamilyMan

        Leo is certainly experienced at faking it, that’s his profession. Pretending to be someone else.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 5:41 am Grim

        Bro, Leo was there to be honored for giving $1 million to save the tigers. He was not trying to stare down Putin As all the badasses on this website are making it out to be. Putin honored him for giving the money to save the tigers and for making it out there after his first plane almost crashed.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 9:32 am retrophoebia

        QED.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:02 pm Ryan Vann

        Indeed, CHers are marveling at magnets again.

        LikeLike


      • on January 10, 2014 at 1:14 pm Earl

        +1 for writing a persuasive essay in 3 sentences, including intro, substance, and conclusion. Rock on. How’s Univeristy of Phoenix going for you?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:02 am jez

        Yep. An actor acting versus the real thing.

        Not that I’m admirer, mind you. Putin was a KGB colonel and he misses the old days. I wouldn’t trust a word he says. But he could snap prettyboy in two.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 9:03 am The Spirit Within

        Exactly. The strongman worship here shows *exactly* the mindset of some of the Chateau commenters. Forget going mainstream, H.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 11:22 am Zombie Shane

        Thank you, Mr Axelrod.

        Now please go back to molesting all those little boys in that Hebrew class you teach.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 2:56 pm Carlos Danger

        A democrat complaining about strong men? That’s a laugh. You guys wouldn’t know democracy of it bit you in the ass.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 3:18 pm The Spirit Within

        What I do see here is the explicit need for a return to, let’s be frank, the caveman imperative, the worship of murderers simply because they are willing to murder. But those men tend to be sociopaths. And worshipping sociopaths is what screwed-up girls do (see: Manson, Charles).

        Get my reasoning?

        The fact that you guys are revering STATE-SANCTIONED MURDERERS like Putin, and wholeheartedly embrace his disdain for civil rights just because he’s an alpha strongman, shows how warped your values are. And while I love the talk about evo psych in these posts — the desperate Facebook kid was a hilarious tool — the intolerant politics in these comments are the very reason that this website will never, ever become more mainstream, even if some of it deserves a brighter spotlight.

        Not unless H starts moderating.

        Zombie Shane, Jay in DC, Greg Eliot, anyone who seriously entertains “the day of the rope” — these are keyboard jockeys one and all, obsessed with violence and comeuppance, and to hell with justice or fair play.

        Signed,
        The (Catholic) Spirit Within

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:02 pm Greg Eliot

        Zombie Shane, Jay in DC, Greg Eliot, anyone who seriously entertains “the day of the rope” — these are keyboard jockeys one and all, obsessed with violence and comeuppance, and to hell with justice or fair play.

        Funny how all the dweebs who call others “keyboard jockeys” always spout off from the safety of their keyboards…

        And invariably the only violence that makes them reach for their vapors is never of the leftist/minority bent… though relatively recent history is far more replete with examples of such.

        FYI, it’s because JUSTICE is long overdue and YT’s sense of FAIR PLAY has been used as a weapon against him that we welcome a settling of accounts… “day of the rope” is a convenient and well-known metaphor for the reckoning.

        You disingenuous Cathedral company man…

        You fairy.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:24 pm Carlos Danger

        Going mainstream would completely ruin this blog.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 5:42 pm ballsweatsoop

        The strongman worship

        Project much?

        When observation of fact becomes worship, cast asunder your own prejudices, and seek within for the prescience that comes with attention to detail.

        (shit, that might actually make sense, I was just trying to string random words together)

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 12:40 am Wally

        “Signed, the (Catholic) Spirit Within”

        More like, Signed, the (Jew Pretending to be Catholic) Spirit Within.

        It’s the new Lilly.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 1:09 am Wally

        “Not unless H starts moderating….Zombie Shane, Jay in DC, Greg Eliot”

        So The Spirit Within wants comments deleted from posters who identify destructive Jewish behavior. Interesting. Now why would a Roman Catholic want posters who point out Jewish involvement in anti-Western behavior banned? Probably because The Spirit Within isn’t Catholic, but rather Jewish. Notice how quickly he is demanding the ADL/Jewish Group tactic of silencing speech they don’t like.

        “Forget going mainstream”

        You mean Forget getting acceptance from Jewish owned and run media companies.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 11:45 am Grim

        Who would win a fist fight between Putin and Jack Reacher (the character in the movie).

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:30 pm Carlos Danger

        Probably Jack Reacher.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:16 am Jay in DC

        Similar to what Joe Blow said— one man fucks models openly, is rich,and connected the world over.

        The other man fucks russian models (on the downlow) because he is married but don’t think otherwise. Is rich and well connected the world over and can— wait for it… wait for it… have you killed if need be unlike man #1. Amy you are simply a normal woman for realizing the difference. Some typical Western bitch may not see the difference at all.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:25 am FamilyMan

        It looks like Putin has about 50 IQ points on the love interest from Titanic. Leo has the look of a man who has had the directions given to him and is very good at following the instructions, eagerly awaiting someone to tell him how to be. Vladimir, well he’s conquering the world and at peace with himself.

        LikeLike


  4. on January 7, 2014 at 2:32 pm Killer Instinct

    haha Love it!

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 10:01 am Marc Bahn

      HAHA! What’s better, the pic, the story or the comments?

      LikeLike


  5. on January 7, 2014 at 2:33 pm mindweapon

    Reblogged this on Mindweapons in Ragnarok and commented:
    The Chateau Heartiste names the J, and points out that Putin did once too!
    http://www.timesofisrael.com/putin-first-soviet-government-was-mostly-jewish/

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 4:34 pm irishsavant

      Sorry to rain on the parade but my research suggests that, despite occasionally straying from the reservation, and localised differences such as with Syria, Putin is fully in bed with the tribe and their agenda.

      http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/?zx=19bf7e2dc34cd63c

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:52 pm SFG

        Putin wants power. That’s it. I don’t think he cares about Jews one way or the other.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:59 pm Zombie Shane

        Thanks.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:22 pm thwack

        OK thats it; I wanna see the short list of all leaders not on the joo payroll.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 7:21 pm Zombie Shane

        Ask and ye shall receive:

        Ø

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 7:25 pm Zombie Shane

        Seriously, thwack, a good sub-question would be to ask yourself how many of your homeboyz are still guilt-free?

        Obama, Jackson and Sharpton all sold their souls years ago.

        Off the top of my head, Farrakhan is about the only one who might still have a clean conscience in that regard.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:24 pm thwack

        You really want me to answer that?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:29 am FamilyMan

        Yes, thwack, do. I agree with the Zombie. Of all those, Farrakhan is the one I respect. Can’t think of another “black leader” that I do, but I don’t know a lot of black leaders so there could always be some I would respect if I knew about them.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:04 am Zombie Shane

        > “there could always be some I would respect if I knew about them”

        This.

        I’ll walk over broken glass for a nigger if it actually has some God-damned CHARACTER AND INTEGRITY.

        You just don’t ever see it in ’em.

        I’ve come to the conclusion that the nigger race doesn’t even DESERVE to count men like Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams and Clarence Thomas and Ben Carson amongst its members.

        Talk about the Good Lord Himself casting pearls before swine…

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 9:21 am thwack

        FamilyMan

        Yes, thwack,. I agree with the Zombie. Of all those, Farrakhan is the one I respect. Can’t think of another “black leader”
        ——————————————————————————————-

        And there in lies the trick. Ya’ll keep lookin for a “leader” when the key is for each person to lead themselves.

        Thats the part they left out in “The Matrix”; the fact that EVERYMAN needs to walk the path Neo did.

        Watch the movie again. Neo was a straight up ni66er until he knew what his purpose was. Once he got it, he didn’t even need Morpheus anymore, or anybody for that matter.

        His entire attitude and posture changed.

        Why follow a leader when you can follow what the leader is following?

        Get in the fight or get left out.

        Now read from the book!

        gohead

        gohead

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:59 pm Greg Eliot

        Putin is fully in bed with the tribe and their agenda.

        Q: How can you tell when a leader is in bed with The Tribe and their agenda?

        A: He isn’t hanging from a tree.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:25 am Jay in DC

        I must diverge with you here completely. Putin -is- a slavic and russian nationalist who knows the score when accepting the YHW driven agenda. He is no stranger to the bolshevik influence. Check your sources— they do not seem genuine.

        In the modern world, you simply cannot escape the tribe if you want political influence, but to say you know that and are in bed with them strains credulity. This guy sent a jew banker oligarch who thought he was above the law to jail for well– eternity. He recently pardoned him just to say that— remember who controls Russia still hebe billionaire. Something to consider.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 10:00 am Zombie Shane

        Yeah, I haven’t studied the matter exhaustively – I only follow what’s in the vanity/celebritardian press – but my gut instinct is that Putin is just about the only fellow in actual power anywhere who gives so much as one iota about the future of Western Civilization.

        The Pauls – Ron and Rand – know what we’re up against, but they aren’t in power.

        I know that Rush Limbaugh is aware of it [about a month or two back, Rush actually blurted out the word “Tribe” on his broadcast – I think he said, “their Tribe”], but back in the day, Rush did the whole, ‘Go to Israel and suck a rabbi’s dick’ routine.

        Which is what Rand has now done, as well as Glenn Beck.

        So to the extent that dudes like Rush and Glenn and Rand feel that they have to make the pilgrimage to Judea & Samaria, to fellate some pharisee cock, you gotta feel that they just sense that the deck is stacked too badly against them right now, and that they have to tread very, very carefully, at least for the time being.

        LikeLike


      • on January 10, 2014 at 9:53 am Some Dude

        lol you think Russia is part of “Western Civilization”

        lmmfao!!!!!!!!!! pick up a book kid, you’re embarrassing yourswlf

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 7:49 am heaviside

        Putin isn’t a Russian nationalist, he’s a pragmatist. I obviously don’t have any privileged knowledge so I don’t know where his deepest loyalties lie, but has he ever done anything that shows he is more than a slick political operator? He just looks like a nationalist compared to Westerners like Obama.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 8:04 am Petr Akuleyev

        Putin has crushed Russian nationalist parties. He openly curries favors with powerful regional bosses in Muslim majority areas like Tatarstan, and has encouraged continued Muslim immigration into Russia. Putin is a “great power” nationalist like his hero Stalin. He wants the Russian state to be important and powerful in the world, he doesn’t particularly care what the ethnic or racial composition of that state is as long as it supports him. Putin attacks pro-Western Russians because he percieves, probably correctly, that they are hedonistic and soft and will not support any program to rebuild Russia as a great power. But he is not motivated by any love of ethnic Russian culture or traditions.

        LikeLike


  6. on January 7, 2014 at 2:33 pm earl

    Putin leads a country…Leo is an actor.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 5:52 pm SFG

      Pretty much. Let’s see Leo put polonium in Ben Stiller’s cereal.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 7:22 pm Zombie Shane

        Please.

        I would pay good money to see that one.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:57 pm Greg Eliot

        Won’t somebody put polonium in his cereal already?

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 7:43 pm Mr.C

      At an earlier time, the likes of Leo would have been the equivalent of Court Jesters in the Kings (Putin’s) Court; good for entertainment and laughs and to be disposed of when the King got bored.
      It is indicative of the times that actors are now held up as idols.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 7:45 pm Mr.C

        On the flip side.
        Politicians probably dream of becoming actors while actors probably dream of becoming politicians.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:57 pm bloxer

        on the flipper side,
        today our politicians are largely actors, while our actors spend a lot of time politicin’

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:06 pm Ryan Vann

        Politics is Hollywood for ugly people, or so the old yarn goes.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 9:19 pm GunsofApollo

        Good point. Would be interesting to see how a rock legend interacts with a world leader. My gut tells me a charismatic legend like Jagger or Robert Plant – guys who don’t give a flying F and whose music has captured more conquest beyond the scope of a single nation – would more than hold their own.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 9:30 pm Joe Blow

        How many people has Robert Plant had murdered because they pissed him off? I’m guessing 5-6 orders of magnitude few than Putin. Plant could maybe hold his own in conversation, so long as it stayed polite. That’s as far as it goes. Being able to order aging boomers to hold up cigarette lighters at a concert isn’t the same as being able to order the 72nd Guards Division in to flatten a breakaway republic. Not even close. Put down the joint, dude, and step away.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:31 am Jay in DC

        ^^^^— Trying to decide if I need to say anything more on this thread. The ability to kill men wholesale- A L W A Y S, always, makes you the alpha male in spite of height, looks or age. Kim Jong Un or Dennis Rodman? Who do you think gets more bitches on command.

        The guy that can kill your whole family on a whim vs. the guy that needs to throw a ball into a hoop. Decide.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 5:54 pm ballsweatsoop

        Most of the people you’ve mentioned are rich enough to hire someone to kill anyone they wanted.

        Not sure what that means, but it occurred to me, reading your posts about the question.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:08 am jez

        No murders that I know of, but he and his bandmates did a lot of stealing in their younger days — of other people’s music, which they then passed off as their own compositions on LZ albums in order to cop the royalties.

        Robert Plant has never subdued Chechnya, however.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 9:06 am The Spirit Within

        “Would be interesting to see how a rock legend interacts with a world leader.”

        See: Bono.

        They paw themselves to have photo ops with the rock star.

        Of course, he actually knows policy, which annoys them when he bends their ear after the flashbulbs fade.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 10:07 am GunsofApollo

        Exactly. Guys like Putin have great power, but its different from celebrity. One is more functional, while the other is more like world-wide social proof which results in not having to prove shit to anybody. Bono gets away with it based on that and being a total douche.

        It would be hilarious to see Putin punch him in the face tho…

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:28 pm CarpeOro

        Sonny Bono? He’s dead dude. The Irish kid may know “topics”, but he isn’t much on real world facts. PC pablum is the bulk of what he spews.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 3:05 pm The Spirit Within

        Ever talk to Bono? Didn’t think so. Ever talk to someone who’s talked to him? Probably not. Ever read articles? I’m guessing no.

        He’s the *one* celebrity who actually does his homework. He’s a bit of a policy wonk egghead.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:03 pm ballsweatsoop

        But seriously, what’s the big difference between your average world leader and a rock star.

        It’s no real wonder they want to blow each other.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:04 pm ballsweatsoop

        Oh, wait, nevermind. The Spirit Within is a fag

        [Bono] the *one* celebrity who actually does his homework. He’s a bit of a policy wonk egghead.

        LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 10:12 am mike

      Yep – actors sometimes get confused that they are as cool and hard as the cool and hard people they portray on film. Still 1 million bucks for tigers is a sweet way to spend your money

      LikeLike


  7. on January 7, 2014 at 2:34 pm Amy

    I gave it to Putin immediately. That look is priceless: “Whatever, prettyboy. I would have moved the iceberg out of the way and thrown the ship to safety.”

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 2:45 pm Greg Eliot

      And then you imagined Pooty-Poot’s arms on your waist, as you leaned over the prow.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:01 pm Mob Barley

        So many places a woman can go nowadays to daydream without getting called out, it’s really quite adorable that they effort to find the one or 2 places left in the world where they still get smacked around by men.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:55 pm Greg Eliot

        It’s a tough job, but we’re all doin’ what we can. 😉

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 10:33 pm Inane Rambler (@UnendImprov)

        Hey, it works for them.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:32 am Jay in DC

        I’M THE QUEEN OF THE WORLD!!

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 4:21 pm haunted trilobite

      Because busy world leaders are always fantasizing about altering the pivotal scenes of chick flicks

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:03 pm Amy

        Yes, because of course I meant that literally. Lol, it’s like an aspie convention in here lately. Is it the cold weather?!

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 11:51 pm GrandpaPUA

        It’s sure chilin my bones. Now, hows about you warm me up by showing me that glorious snatch you got hidin down south there. my darlin clementine?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:12 am jez

        I’m starting to like Amy. I am.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:01 am haunted trilobite

        my bad, humour isn’t allowed on ork

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 10:18 am Marc Bahn

      YOW you’re.

      LikeLike


  8. on January 7, 2014 at 2:34 pm Wrecked 'Em

    New graphic for the header is better… might go with a more contrast color on the CHATEAU HEARTISTE part.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:09 pm Kate

      Its just as I always imagined it!!! So pretty all lit up.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:33 am Jay in DC

        It would have been better if you either a) fucked him once or b) at least sent naked selfies before commiting to Herr Minter. Just sayin’….

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 5:16 pm Reservoir Tip

      A golden yellow for the font.

      LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 11:17 am Southern Man

      I miss the cuffs.

      LikeLike


  9. on January 7, 2014 at 2:34 pm alcockell

    As an Aspie – I’ve always felt uncomfortable when alphas are trying to out-alpha… where would we autistic folk come in?

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 2:36 pm Hugh G. Rection

      They don’t register.

      LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 2:42 pm Greg Eliot

      Y’all are in the background above… didn’t ya notice?

      LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 5:55 pm SFG

      Omega, dude. I feel your pain–I never agreed with SMV as the measure of a man. Hey, Newton never got laid, but he gave us classical mechanics. Flee back to your computer. If you have a useful skill, alphas are smart enough to know they have to keep you around for something, whereas women just hate you.

      Truly, the beta and omega male loses the most from any empowerment of women.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:03 pm Zombie Shane

        Newton also drew-and-quartered [drawed-and-quartered?] mother-fuckers when they were caught counterfeiting his currency [during his time at the Exchequer and the Mint].

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:55 pm SFG

        Did he do it himself? No, he used his brain to catch the fuckers, and let someone else do the dirty work. Division of labor.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 5:57 pm ballsweatsoop

        But the point is that he knew what would result from his (brain) work. And was cool with it.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 6:32 pm rob

        He attended the executions and bystanders said he seemed to take pleasure.

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 12:41 am FamilyMan

      As a nerdy type myself I think one can get the benefit of game without all the alpha peacocking. Women like competence and the ability to get things done, and that gets them wet, and their snatch isn’t so chilly that it holds out for the ultra ultra uber alpha.

      That said, what is it about Putin that is inaccessible to an Aspie? He’s cold, he’s goal oriented, he’s clever, in my opinion he’s spiritual. He might be an Aspie after all — from before the time when there was such a label.

      And if you’re Putin, you aren’t being Putin for the pussy, that’s just a thing you take because it’s available, a normal part of life that he certainly can get. He could be doing a lot less and still have access to as much sex with attractive females as he wants.

      An Aspie could not be the other guy in the picture, DiCaprio. That profession requires a lot of non-Aspie traits. But DiCaprio’s face looks like clay next to Putin’s rock.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:49 am SFG

        It’s not obvious from his public appearances, but guys like Putin are skilled bureaucratic manipulators, which Aspies can’t do, because you have to read facial expressions–‘did that guy buy my story about the meeting being on Thursday or not?’ He seems rough by American standards, but he’s become successful in Russia, not America.

        My advice is to work out, not get hung up on any one girl (act like a guy with options even if you’re not), and avoid any girl above an 8 or so. Unless you’re rich, then you can go for one of those 1-in-a-million hot nerd chicks that pop up from time to time.

        LikeLike


  10. on January 7, 2014 at 2:38 pm Hugh Mann

    All the body language says Di Caprio. But that’s because Putin name-checked him in his speech. India probably has most of the world’s remaining tigers.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-11836702

    Mr Putin broke off from a prepared speech after he spotted DiCaprio in the audience.

    “A person with less stable nerves could have decided against coming, could have read it as a sign – that it was not worth going,” Mr Putin said.

    The prime minister said that, in Russia, DiCaprio’s efforts made him a “muzhik” – or “real man”.

    Slightly different body language in this picture.

    http://newsfeed.time.com/2010/11/25/vladimir-putin-leonardo-di-caprio-is-a-real-man/

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:33 pm Anonymous

      Putin leaning back like a king (but slightly effeminate hand placement). DiCaprio leaning in.
      Putin FTW

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:50 am FamilyMan

        DiCaprio’s face looks better in that one. He’s making the sale and Putin is the buyer, but he doesn’t have the clay face of not knowing what to do next.

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 8:05 pm FamilyMan

      Actually, “muzhik” means “peasant” according to this link:
      http://www.thefreedictionary.com/muzhik

      mu•zhik or mu•zjik (muˈʒɪk, ˈmu ʒɪk)

      n.
      a Russian peasant.
      [1560–70; < Russian muzhík, derivative of muzh husband, man]
      Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary, © 2010 K Dictionaries Ltd. Copyright 2005, 1997, 1991 by Random House, Inc. All rights reserved.

      I am no expert speaker of Russian but I know a little of the language, and yes "muzh" is a man. The "ik" ending is somewhat diminutive, putting someone at a lower level than the speaker. Hence a "muzhik" is a "little man" or a peasant rather than a gentleman. Putin was actually insulting DiCaprio in two ways: once by calling this rich prettyboy a peasant, and twice by implying (for sure, correctly) that DiCaprio knows so little of Russian culture that he can't detect the insult.

      I don't think Putin has any respect for DiCaprio or movie types generally. There is a class of intelligentsia in the world, pretty much anywhere but the USA, that feels that way about mere showbiz people. Here in the USA the influence of Hollywood subverts that natural sentiment by means of massive and pervasive pressure and spending.

      LikeLike


      • on January 10, 2014 at 4:18 am Petr Akuleyev

        You don’t know colloquial Russian very well. “Muzhik” is almost always used approvingly in modern Russian – calling someone a “muzhik” is like saying someone is a real man’s man. It carries the good connotations of being a peasant – strong, doesn’t put on airs, not pretentious, direct and honest. Basically it is the opposite of “fag”. Putin was not insulting DiCaprio directly. But it is true that coming from Putin this is a backhanded compliment (very alpha of him) – a “muzhik” is someone you want working with you, not a leader, so Putin clearly pulled rank.

        LikeLike


      • on January 10, 2014 at 5:24 am Carlos Danger

        I don’t think Putin has any respect for DiCaprio or movie types generally. I sure don’t.

        LikeLike


  11. on January 7, 2014 at 2:40 pm Hugh G. Rection

    What’s with the hideous header graphic?

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 2:49 pm Amy

      I liked the other too. Flowers, candles… perfect irony.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:42 pm Pluviophile

        Coincidence, not irony. Your father failed you yet again.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 7:52 pm Amy

        Ummm, no. Irony. A header of flowers and candles in a blog about Skittles and negs is ironic, not coincidental. Coincidence doesn’t involve deliberate incongruity. Someone doesn’t know his Greek and Latin derivations…

        But I wonder: Why is it so important to you to try to insult my father? (That’s what we call “rhetorical”)

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 2:30 pm Pluviophile

        Cute. Now curtsey.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:08 pm Amy

        Pluviophile can always be counted on to demonstrate the overcompensating try-hard. Tip: Just ignore me.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 2:50 pm thwack

      Obviously taken from a moving vehicle; Wayne Manor?

      LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:12 pm Grim

      I like it. It’s darker. The enemy is getting worse and in 2014 it’s time to bring the shiv even harder.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:41 pm corvinus

        Good answer.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:04 pm Zombie Shane

        Pretty much exactly my thought as well – that it was a pretty strong throwdown of the gauntlet.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 10:34 pm Inane Rambler (@UnendImprov)

        I have to say, this is a pretty good observation. 2013 was the year the world found out about us, 2014 is the year they will try to shut us down.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:39 am Jay in DC

        +1 leave it to some dumb cunt to talk about irony at the “End of Days” when a dark manor is the only light left in the world. I don’t normally jack up female commenters because pussy chases me but just stop.

        If the wheels come off, and they may– will you be chasing negs and candy? Or a darkly lit structure on a hillside where electricity still functions and the rule of law may yet still apply in a land of anarchy and decay.

        You are a female, you cannot think beyond the end of the week– I get it. But don’t disparage adult men who can see beyond the current time horizon, it just confirms stereotypes wholly.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 7:20 pm Amy

        Are you serious? I just posted a long comment on the importance of attaching myself to a man who can survive hand to hand combat so I can survive the economic chaos of the end of fiat currency. I read zerohedge daily. I’m one of the most apocalyptic chicks you’ll ever meet.

        But it’s just a photo. Relax.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:24 pm Desu

      Looks like MS paint, lol

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:06 pm Hugh G. Rection

        But lacks the usual assortment of cocks.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:36 pm YaReally

        srsly. It’s like looking at a 14yo’s MySpace page.

        One of you rich billionaire dudes with a custom suit, plz donate $5 to CH lol:

        http://fiverr.com/categories/graphics-design/web-banner-design-header/#layout=auto&filter=rating&jls_sca357_1_rating=1

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:44 pm Pluviophile

        How many 14 year old kids do you troll on Myspace?

        Please don’t answer.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:05 pm Zombie Shane

        LOL’ed.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:20 pm Hugh G. Rection

        No. Let him answer. YaReally, why don’t you have a seat over here.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:09 pm Mob Barley

        Next to Mr HugeErection.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 11:54 pm YaReally

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 2:32 pm Pluviophile

        YaReally,

        That gif was a perfect example of alpha indifference, your example, as usual, is always before us.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:50 am Jay in DC

        Personally, one thing I think will be hilarious, is if/when the inflated US dollar finally collapses. The domino effect will be severe, and beyond your imagining. Just yesterday— you were able to make snarky comments on the internet and spend your life chasing pussy. Today, the internet doesn’t exist, that is odd, isn’t it? Well, let us go out and try to close some sets at least.

        Why are all these ni66as roaming the streets? Should I be scared? Not sure. Maybe I’ll just jet back to the crib tonight. Damn… internet still down. Can’t post or watch another Tyler video. I’ll just try and text that chick from last week. Dafuq? My cell service down too? Guess I’m watching a movie tonight.

        Get it goofball? You spend your life outsmarting men but if your bubble pops, men won’t care anymore about your slick talking, and bullshit. They will call you on the carpet and you will fail.

        Your game only works in the current incarnation of the world we know. In some future and worse off time, you go to the back of the line, begging for scraps as it has always been for most of history.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 2:02 am YaReally

        “Your game only works in the current incarnation of the world we know. In some future and worse off time, you go to the back of the line, begging for scraps as it has always been for most of history.”

        lol. I will be busy using my social skills to rally up those “ni66as roaming the streets” so we can come take all your shit. So thank-you in advance for all the hard work you’re doing earning more stuff for us to enjoy when the zombie apocalypse arrives…we salute your effort and I hope you have a backyard pool for the parties we throw. 😀

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 2:07 am YaReally

        more thoughts because I lol’ed hard when I read your doomsday scenario:

        Think about it this way: is there more of YOU, who will be cushy and comfortable during this inevitable financial apocalypse, or more of US, who will be poor and desperate and angry and have nothing to lose?

        I can offer my fellow angry torch-carrying peasants pussy to help me storm your castle. What can you offer them that will stop them? 😉 lol

        Man now I want to go watch Braveheart…

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:52 am MK

        When has an army like that ever worked in America, good luck with that plan.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:17 am YaReally

        “When has an army like that ever worked in America”

        Feminism? I mean, Obama is already handing young single white guys’ money to single moms lol I don’t see any of you rich billionaire CEOs stopping him. And if you tried to, half of your peers would fight you to prevent you from succeeding because they’ve been socially conditioned by an army that couldn’t even vote until recently.

        http://www.the-spearhead.com/2013/11/18/obamacare-is-a-bachelor-tax-that-will-fail/

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 7:22 am Hugh G. Rection

        You seem awful sure about that outcome.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:21 pm Scray

        Get it goofball? You spend your life outsmarting men but if your bubble pops, men won’t care anymore about your slick talking, and bullshit. They will call you on the carpet and you will fail.

        lol ya, because women have only recently become attracted to the behaviors embodied by ‘game.’

        In some future and worse off time, you go to the back of the line, begging for scraps as it has always been for most of history.

        Huh? In ancient societies the men who did well possessed what we would call ‘game.’ Or at the very least they had extremely strong realities. Charisma, and by extension learned charisma, increases fitness — charisma gains you strength in numbers; it’s a form of crowd control.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 3:31 pm Amy

        Charisma gets you high numbers of FEMALES. We’re no good for physical protection. Lol

        I’m with Jay on this one. My dad’s a former Marine and he judges men by one standard: whether he’d want to be in a foxhole with him. Charisma is meaningless when you’re under physical attack. It may be an overly apacolyptic way of looking at things, but I was taught to look beyond charisma and assess the real strength (mental as well as physical) of the man himself. Is a guy like DiCaprio really going to protect me when the chips are down? No question Putin could.

        And money doesn’t always get the win, either. Measure Putin against a guy like Donald Trump. Assume Trump has much more money (I have no idea if true). Yes, money buys power, but it’s not enough to make Trump a real alpha to me. All it means is that he has a better opportunity to run and hide if things go bad. Can he kill in hand to hand combat if he has to? Does he have the restraint to withhold force until it’s necessary and appropriate? Is he comfortable enough in his own skin to be reserved about his power and capabilities? No to all three. Trump’s a blowhard who can’t keep his mouth shut and brags incessantly– sure signs of insecurity and weakness. He may be charismatic and rich but he’d never pass my dad’s foxhole test.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 3:46 pm MK

        It was warlord game all Putin no Decaprio in this particular example.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:19 pm thwack

        Amy
        Charisma gets you high numbers of FEMALES. We’re no good for physical protection. Lol
        —————————————————————————————————-

        Can you hide a gun without actin like you hid a gun?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:41 pm Scray

        lol every great dictator or leader has had charisma above everything else. That is their one common trait — nothing else. It’s not just chix.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 12:29 am YaReally

        Charisma leads men. Sure, I may not rally your dad on my side, but I’ll rally up the 200 men around him that don’t meet his standards…cause there’s a lot more of them than there are of men who pass that foxhole test.

        I’m sure in the foxhole his buddy and him will die a super honorable death worthy of the next Saving Private Ryan movie and be super proud of their manliness, but my 200 dudes will be banging their women and looting the corpses as we head toward Jay in DC’s mansion lol

        “Charisma gets you high numbers of FEMALES. We’re no good for physical protection. Lol”

        Women are currency. The entire nightlife industry is built on the notion that “for the chance of getting pussy, men will voluntarily give up their resources (time, money, health, etc)”. That’s why a group of hot girls walk into a Vegas nightclub on a Saturday night free and a group of guys pay a $40 cover.

        Charisma gets women, which means I can pimp those women out to the men following me (it’s the oldest industry in the world, after all) in exchange for their loyalty. Your dad in his foxhole can’t offer them that, and we can take it by force from Jay’s mansion.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 7:11 am anon914

        Hey, been a fan of your posts for awhile, you seem to deeply understand pick-up. You know any forum that has high quality discussion/posts? I’ve seen sosuave and others and they suck.

        LikeLike


  12. on January 7, 2014 at 2:45 pm Walt Nawalt

    DiCaprio can fleetingly act like an alpha, particularly in front of a crowd.
    If they met behind closed doors, Putin’s look would remain the same, like he’s going to nut the pretty boy and watch him fall to the floor and writhe. I am sure he pistol-whipped enough drunk Krauts in the GDR back in his KGB days where Gilbert Grape’s brother doesn’t bother him….

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 2:59 pm thwack

      Is this “contest” a joke?

      As far as I know DiCaprio is just an actor, a good one, but still just an actor.

      Putin may have killed a man ( with a knife); possibly more than once. Dicaprio probably never even cleaned a fish.

      Cap boy better hope Putin don’t have a flash back.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:08 pm Walt Nawalt

        For public consumption, it’s not a joke in the sense I am sure DiCaprio is full of himself. That’s why Putin could call him a real man, etc., he doles out the standard. Putin probably told Cappy to pass along an invite to Sofia Vergara to come see the sights.

        LikeLike


  13. on January 7, 2014 at 2:50 pm jack

    If the camera had been slightly panned down, you would have noticed Silvio Burlusconi owning both of them.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 2:59 pm Anonymous

      Blowjob joke?

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:22 pm haunted trilobite

        Short man joke. smh

        LikeLike


  14. on January 7, 2014 at 2:51 pm Phillyastro

    Is Putin correct? A quick look at the first Soviet Council reveals a few Jews but also some Georgians, Old Believers, and Cossacks too.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:33 pm Greg Eliot

      Concern troll…

      The members of the Party Congress (or whatever they called it back then) were indeed comprised of 80%+ YKW.

      “You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over
      Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They Hated
      Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered
      millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse.
      The October Revolution was not what you call in America the
      ‘Russian Revolution.’
      It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people.
      More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their
      bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the
      entirety of human history.
      It cannot be understated. Bolshevism committed the greatest
      human slaughter of all time.
      The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about
      this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands
      of the perpetrators.”

      – Alexander Solzhenitzyn

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:19 pm Carlos Danger

        80% is a low figure. Most of those listed as Russians or Georgians were in fact J-ws hiding their ethnicity, which was common practice in Bolshevik circles. Trotsky’s real name is Levi Bronstein and his passport also says he was Russian. Moreover, most of the gentiles in the movement were married to J-wish women. Essentially, about 100,000 foreign J-ws entered the country and began to confiscate property and murder people. A legion of Satanic ghouls stole the country in 1917. They were unspeakably cruel and sadistic. Cutting tongues out of priests mouths, cutting open women’s wombs in front of their families or slowly dismembering children in front of their parents. One trick was to nail a victim’s intestines at one end to a tree and then make them run around the tree, winding out their guts until they died. They were also heavily over represented in the security forces. Some ten million people, nearly all Christians, were murdered by the Bolsheviks, many in the manner described above. No wonder, the press, which is in the hands of the perpetrators, has been silent about these crimes. When I fist read of these crimes, I was enraged. This all happened between 1918 and 1926, before Stalin came to power and Lazar Kaganovich and Genrich Yagoda created the Gulag system. Then industrial style slaughter killed at least another 20 million, nearly all Christian ethnic Russians and Ukrainians. The Nazis were amateurs in comparison.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:37 pm Anonymous

      He’s lying, of course. (Hey, KGB, what were you expecting?)

      Out of the 16 members of the Council of People’s Commissars, one (1) was Jewish.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_People%27s_Commissars

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:43 pm Greg Eliot

        How about the Party Congress, shekel-grubber?

        Pardon me, but I’ll take Solzhenitsyn’s council over you Sunstein shills.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:44 pm Greg Eliot

        Make that “counsel”.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:53 pm Anonymous

        The Counsil of People’s Commissars was the government 1922-1946. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_the_Soviet_Union

        There were dozens of party congresses, most only lasted a few days.

        I’ve presented facts. You’ve presented nothing.

        And your Solzhenitsyn quote is fake, you lying liar. But here’s a real one:”it would be quite wrong to say that the Jews ‘organized’ the revolutions of 1905 and 1917, just as it was not organized by any other nation as such.” – 200 Years Together.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:02 pm Greg Eliot

        You’ve presented wikipedia… that well-known, totally objective and comprehensive fact source… llozoozllzozozlzlzozozlzlzl.

        Nobody needs to fake Solzhenitsyn quotes… except maybe you cogdissers… just like awhile back, here at the chateau, one of your ilk (silly Lily) tried to palm off that he wrote a poem praising the Soviet army rape of German women.

        And we’re still waiting for the publication of the entirety of 200 Years Together in English, aren’t we, Schlomo? That says it all… in spades.

        Until then, burden is on you Casstein shills.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:23 pm Carlos Danger

        How would you know? The book has never been published in English. Do you speak French or German?

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:42 pm Carlos Danger

        The Party was 80-90% YKW for at least the first 15 years and 60-65% after about another 15 year transition period. The Soviets had to implement a sort of affirmative action program for gentiles. They were heavily represented in the security forces and created and ran the Gulag system. I have a post in moderation that discusses the level of cruelty the Bolsheviks demonstrated. Great Russian writers like Tolstoy, Dostoevsky and Alexander Block foresaw these evil times and wrote about it. It was as if a horde of demons had possessed the land. If people knew the details, the Tribe could never hold up the Holocaust as a talisman to ward off and shame the Goyim again.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 9:43 pm FamilyMan

        Asking that someone speak French or German (languages taught in most US high schools) or even Russian (was taught in my high school but that was sort of unusual) is not asking a lot. Are we really all dumber than the Europeans?

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:55 pm David

        Communism is Jewish, from pillar to post.

        Karl Marx = Jew
        Leon Trotsky = Jew
        Vladimir Lenin = Jew

        Photographs of the Boleshviks look like ADL meets. (It’s widely theorized that Stalin was a crypto Jew, incidentally, like John Kerry and Madeline Albright and so many others.)

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:52 pm irishsavant

        Anyone who claims to have studied Soviet history and denies that the early Bolsheviks were overwhelmingly Jewish is simply lying. The gang who murdered the Czar and his family were Jewish, as was Sverdlov, who gave the order from Moscow. Lenin spoke Yiddish at home and ownership of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was punishable by death.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:39 pm Carlos Danger

        I don’t believe party membership ever dropped below 60%, even at the end.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:55 pm Anonymous

        It’s widely theorized* that your mom pulls trains down at the bus station.

        *And by widely theorized, I mean all the brothers know.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:04 pm Greg Eliot

        Heh, heh… didn’t take much to make you revert to type, did it?

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:23 pm Anonymous

        Your mom has her type, that’s for sure.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:51 pm Greg Eliot

        Get off the mothers, boy… I got off yours about an hour ago.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:47 pm Arbiter

      “a few Jews” All things have their season. Sometimes you should talk, and sometimes you should be silent and learn, Philly:

      Racial/ethnic makeup of the first Central Committe, the Council of People’s Commissars, the Central Executive Committee and the Extraordinary Commission:

      http://researchlist.blogspot.se/2011/06/jewish-nature-of-soviet-union.html

      Quotes about the Soviet Union by Winston Churchill, American diplomats and missionaries in Russia, etc:

      http://researchlist.blogspot.se/2011/06/quotes-about-soviet-union.html

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:14 pm Greg Eliot

        Everyone’s a liar and everything’s faked!!!

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:05 pm Phillyastro

        Jesus Christ! Ask one question and get the holier-than-thou treatment from the Thule Society. I think I’d rather pal around with the Levites any day of the week.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:56 pm SFG

        We have more money.

        OTOH, the women….yecch.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:50 pm Greg Eliot

        Concern troll is concerned.

        LikeLike


  15. on January 7, 2014 at 2:53 pm Mina

    Putin wins, but not for the reason you posted.

    http://timenewsfeed.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/rtxv01d.jpg?w=360&h=240&crop=1

    LikeLike


  16. on January 7, 2014 at 2:55 pm teemilla

    These images end the debate. Putin may hold the drink too high, but DiCaprio’s hands are crossed in front of his junk.

    Or, see here for another example.

    Putin: 100, DiCaprio: 5

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:48 pm Arbiter

      Good find. Putin wins.

      LikeLike


  17. on January 7, 2014 at 2:56 pm Grim

    Tie, as I stated when this was posted in the comments section a few threads back.

    Leo is a total badass and extra badass to pull that off. BS that Putin wins for being shorter because of how he handles it. In the most classic of all alpha tests–size and power–between silverbacks, Leo wins again. Little Putin is the size of a woman that is appropriate for Leo, and he’s staring at Leo’s Adam’s apple.

    Plus Leo is merely an actor — more total badass points to even be in that situation and go big man on “big” man w/ Putin.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:39 pm Some dude

      Nice try

      LikeLike


  18. on January 7, 2014 at 2:57 pm Anon

    Did CH just name the Jew?

    wow just wow…

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:49 pm Arbiter

      No, he simply quoted Putin. If people would start beef over this quote, they can go talk to Putin.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:27 pm Anon

        He didn’t simply quote Putin. He praised Putin for having the balls to say it, and granted him a point and the victory in the match over it.

        ergo he named the Jew.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:37 pm Greg Eliot

        Vapors on tap here at the chateau.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:16 pm Mob Barley

        I think his main point was that Putin named the Jew in middle of a speech… to a Jewish audience.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 5:58 pm SFG

      Oh please, he’s been implying it for years. Notice how Eurosabra’s gone, and even Lily’s not around anymore?

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:35 pm Carlos Danger

        Lily was anything if not tenacious. I pity her husband. He’ll never sleep.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 7:13 am SFG

        How do you know she’s married?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 11:14 am Full-Fledged Fiasco

        How do you know “she'”s a woman?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 11:54 am SFG

        Good point. I think I need to have some fun on feminist websites. 😉

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 1:39 am Wally

        My guess was that Lily was not one woman. Maybe the poster was a group of people. Part of the “Internet Defense Forces” of one ethno-religious group.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 3:50 pm Carlos Danger

        I don’t. It was a pure assumption. I speculate that she is indeed a woman, but a sexually frustrated one. The husband or BF were hypothetical.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 10:53 am mike

        I miss Lily. She put some people here in their place. Sharia law is taking over parts of London, the name Mohammed is the most popular birth name in the UK; and parts of European cities are no go areas etc and still the conspiracy theorists here are whining about friggin’ joos. The world has gone fucking mad

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 11:20 am Joachim Peiper

        I don’t. She was stupid, obtuse, and dishonest. Most everything she said was a falsehood. London is being over run with Muslims because the Tribe desires it so. You are being ethnically cleansed at their behest. Lily defended those people.

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 12:56 am Jay in DC

      Wow just wow… makes your statement 100 billion times more awesome. Just like saying srsly instead of seriously. Because the interwebs and naming the jew are Srs Bzness (Serious Business)

      But the jew name themselves mainly so I’d say CH is just reporting the news…

      LikeLike


  19. on January 7, 2014 at 3:01 pm Jack-o-Lantern

    “DiCaprio’s eyes, unfortunately, are obscured by the camera angle, so we can’t know if he’s meeting Putin’s pupils or looking askance as Putin sizes him up. We’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and say the former.”

    I don’t agree. I think we can see a sliver of Leo’s left pupil and he appears to be looking askance, almost as if he is avoiding Vlad’s glare. Points to Vlad on this one.

    I love the look on Vlad’s face and the the slight inclination of his head to one side. In his typically slightly bored, aloof manner, Vlad appears to be saying “Yeah, you’re a real man as far as Hollywood types go. But, I’m the man with real power, while you’re ultimately just a poseur”.

    LikeLike


  20. on January 7, 2014 at 3:02 pm democratsarefascists

    OMG. Anyone who thinks there’s anything alpha about di Crappio should have their testosterone level checked STAT.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:07 pm Grim

      Sharp elbows Bro, Leo has banged and *forgotten* more HB9s in the last 15 years than you have even rubbed one out to on your computer screen.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:35 pm Greg Eliot

        Point and game to Grim.

        Your serve, kid.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:21 pm democratsarefascists

        Bullshit. This says more about your fantasies of him, or your being who you think he is, than it does anything else. That guy does nothing with women, just likes that some of them want him, while his tastes run toward men. Kind of like you.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:58 am Jay in DC

        Two things—

        1) In the true alpha game, Putin wins hands down as said above.

        but in the pussy game—

        2) Leo slays. You are a delusional fuck if you think he hasn’t crushed it since forever. Bar Rafali, Giselle Bundschen— supermodels. Those are the very short list.

        Your butthurt does suit you though. Never in your wildest imagination could you live this life.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 3:05 am Eliezer Ben-Yehuda

        Bar’s an 8, but to my tastes, not really any higher. Her “supermodel” career fell apart somewhat ==before== Leo ditched her. She’s done ONE Hebrew-language film since she went back to Israel. (no agent would sponsor her for an extension of her USA work visa). She was quoted in Ma’ariv newspaper as saying that not many guys approach her, and NONE of them are of the level that she feel’s entitled to as the former temporary service vagina for a Hollywood star. Many people in Israel who lost loved ones in the conflict, do NOT appreciate that she fraudulantly (= bullshit marriage at 18) dodged the draft. She is no longer professionally represented….. if you want Bar to work for you, you will get referred to a fax number which is at her mom’s house. You will NOT find Bar celebrated in any of the Hebrew-language newspapers or the woman’s magazine (published in Tarzana, CA) of America.

        In my opinion, her SMV in Hebrew-speaking circles is kinda analogous to a single mother. She’ll go find some rather older, shlubby guy when she sees the wall right in front of her.

        Israel is still mostly an extended-family oriented culture and Bar has burned a lot of bridges within it.

        Bar gambled that she would turn out to be a special snowflake…. and lost the gamble.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:24 pm panelvan

        He will always be Arnie Grape.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:10 pm Greg Eliot

      I couldn’t take him seriously in most movies… he looked like a 14 year old kid for the longest time.

      But fair is fair, he was convincing in The Departed.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:24 pm thwack

        Ditto on the 14 year old kid thing; probably why I never took him too seriously.; but he appears to be maturing tastefully.

        My prediction?

        His best years are still ahead of him (if he don’t fuck it up)

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:23 pm ballsweatsoop

        I thought he was pretty good in Catch Me If You Can.

        The Departed was suprisingly good. Best Scene Van Morrison wailing Comfortble Numb? C’mon.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 3:21 pm thwack

        Is his character in “The Departed” the most “bad guy” character he has ever played?

        If not, whats the name of the movie where his character is so evil it disturbed his fans?

        And don’t say Django.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 6:01 pm SFG

      I don’t know about an identical-looking guy in the same position with the same body language, but *Leo DiCaprio* is a Hollywood actor, giving him major social proof, not to mention shitloads of dough.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:24 pm ballsweatsoop

        and he’s a fucking actor. Fake it till you mean it, and all that, yes. but an actor.

        LikeLike


  21. on January 7, 2014 at 3:05 pm The Bieber

    How about these alphas?

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:58 pm David

      lol

      LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 12:00 am Robin Goodfellow

      At first … I thought it was a parody.

      LikeLike


  22. on January 7, 2014 at 3:06 pm earl

    I’d like to see Putin vs. Genghis Khan.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:34 pm Rick250

      I’d prefer a pic of him shaking Roosh’s hand.

      Putin to Roosh: “I enjoyed ‘Bang Ukrainne’ very much. Now tell me again of these DC and Toronto blockers of the cock you speak of.”

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:36 pm Greg Eliot

        Okay, I actually lol’ed.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 6:05 pm SFG

      The Rooskies actually beat the Mongols over time. Mongolia was a satellite state of the Soviet Union for a while…

      But:

      Real life, one nuke takes down the Khan. No question. So you have to put them in the same time period.

      I’d actually bet on the Khan. Putin’s a master bureaucrat and quite ruthless, but he only stands out in our milquetoast democratic age. The Khan would make short work of him in the medieval era.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:33 pm Carlos Danger

        The Vietnamese are the only people I can think of that defeated the Mongols in their day.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 7:48 pm AlphaBeta

        The Muslims also prevented the Mongols from being able to waltz into Europe

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 2:59 am Arbiter

        The Muslims also prevented the Mongols from being able to waltz into Europe

        Eh? The Mongols defeated the Persian Empire. They set up Khanates in the area, some of which lasted for quite a while. The Turks, hangers-on riding on the Mongols’ coattails, came to Byzantium thanks to the Mongols moving through the Middle East. Which was probably the single worst thing the Mongols did, the killing of twelve million Chinese not even a close second. Hey, China, you lost a fraction of your people, but you didn’t have to put up with Turks.

        The Mongols reached Europe and met a combined force of German and Polish knights on the battlefield. The Poles offered them pickled cucumbers and the Germans offered them sauerkrauts, but the Mongols refused and attacked anyway, beating the knights and all rules of sportsmanship by firing arrows from afar.

        As a last resort, the Poles then reminded the Mongols that if they took Poland they would have 90 percent of European Jewry on their hand. “Holy matar!” screamed the Mongols and promptly rode off. As an excuse they claimed they had to return home and elect a new ruler, as Ogedei Khan had just died.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasion_of_Europe#Invasion_of_the_Kingdom_of_Hungary

        During the spring of 1242, Ögedei Khan died at the age of fifty-six after a binge of drinking during a hunting trip. Batu Khan, who was one of the contenders to the imperial throne, returned at once with his armies to Asia, leaving the whole of Eastern Europe depopulated and in ruins (before withdrawal, Batu Khan ordered wholesale execution of prisoners). But because of his withdrawal, Western Europe escaped unscathed.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:33 pm Jay in DC

        I once questioned your gender. It is now confirmed you are a male of some form or fashion. No woman knows this much about the historical record.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 9:19 pm Mr.B

        The Japanese and Egyptians defeated the Mongols too..

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 9:25 pm Carlos Danger

        You’re right. I had forgotten about the Japanese. They were saved once by a typhoon and they actually drove them off the island too, with heavy losses. I didn’t know the Egyptians had also defeated them. You’d never guess it from today’s Egyptian army.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 10:39 pm Inane Rambler (@UnendImprov)

        The Mamluks defeated him, but the Mamluks were slaves bought from the Caucasus.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:17 am Nomennovum

        True about the Japs. They coined the phrase, “Fuck you, Mongohrians!” — not the Chinese. As for the hapless Egyptians? Heh, who can’t beat a bunch of retards?

        LikeLike


  23. on January 7, 2014 at 3:08 pm Bob Wallace

    The effeminate DiCaprio? Please.

    LikeLike


  24. on January 7, 2014 at 3:10 pm Grim

    CH, what’s your point re: the latest tweet re: rape pregnancy? That women are biologically/subconsciously turned on by it and somehow are slightly more “open” to letting the little swimmers get to where they need to get, since in fact all sex in the animal kingdom is rape (not in the feminist “this is wrong” way)?

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:44 pm Some dude

      Sounds about right. It’s not just about them being ‘open’ to it psychologically. Women’s bodies are physiologically ‘open’ when they orgasm during rape. The orgasm reduces the acidity of her lady parts thus making it a safer environment for the sploog. Boom.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:04 pm Anonymous

        It could be that rapists tend to take their victims at times closer to ovulation. This would be encouraged by the fact that women dress and behave more promiscuously around ovulation. It could also be that rapists have more vital sperm than non-rapists on average.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 7:24 pm thwack

        Ok, let me put on my over thinking HBD white boy hat and sperg out for a moment:

        The key to rape pregnancy is rapists have a highly developed olfactory mechanism allowing them to determine which females have access to males in their social circle who will kill rapists with their bare hands.

        These females secrete an enzyme from that little dip above their upper lip that rapists (who have a more advanced sense of smell) can detect. This is the real reason women want alpha males. Its so they can produce the anti rape enzyme.

        Women who ain’t got no killas, can’t produce the enzyme; ergo, they get raped.

        Interestingly, women who get pregnant from rape often begin to produce this enzyme in an attempt to turn their rapist into a man who will kill rapists with their bare hands.

        To sum up, these socio-economical and empherial postulations are in exact cohesion with that which has been facilitated through neo Darwinian transmutational theory.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:21 pm Mob Barley

        Ha!

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 10:39 pm Patriarch

        Hahahaha

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:39 pm Jay in DC

        *golf clap*— hliarity ensues.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 8:18 pm Amy

      To really make this comparison, I think you’d have to use forcible, stranger-rape victims only (no date or statutory rape). Women who got pregnant from guys who just grabbed them off the street at night. I’d like to see the percentage of those crimes that resulted in pregnancy. I think it would be very low, but who knows.

      Does anyone really believe rapists are trolling for ovulating women? These are usually crimes of violent, sudden opportunity, and it’s about power just as much as sex. The guy is just looking for a vulnerable female of generic attractiveness. Again… I’m talking about stranger jump-out-of bushes psycho rapist, not drunk fraternity guy getting pushy with half-conscious drunk girl.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 10:40 pm Patriarch

        Do you really believe rapists rape for power?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 2:39 am C

        Women er both more likely to orgasm, and get pregnant from rape, than from consensual sex.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:33 am Amy

        Oh come on. Let’s see the backup for that. Again to actually be conclusive, it has to be a study confined to rapes that we can ALL agree are rapes, not schoolteacher-student rapes or buyers-remorse date rape scenarios. First degree violent 100% consensual rape. Women orgasm more during those? I’ll bet money that’s not even close to true.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 3:07 am Arbiter

        “and it’s about power just as much as sex.”

        –No it isn’t. That’s a feminist canard meant to portray men as evil beings who use rape as a “part of the structural oppression of women”.

        If rape would be about power, why don’t rapists seek out older women who have had time to climb the career ladder? Why don’t they seek out women who dress in expensive clothes, even if those women are older and less attractive? Instead, rapists seek out young women who are as attractive as possible, with no concern for how much money they make. In fact, a lack of money is probably only a bonus, as rich women would presumably be more able to make the police add extra resources to the case.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:56 am graham

        Right. It should also be clear that since immodest dress and behaviour encourage rape, and since women are more likely to be immodest around the time of their ovulation, there would be some correlation there.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 10:24 am dmonn

        Rape is about sex and power. It’s possible to wield power over someone without having a raging boner, so it’s dumb that anyone would say rape is all about power. This whole “rape is about power” bullcrap originated as a counter against spergy Darwinists in the ’60s who speculated that rape is some sort of adaptalicious invention of evomolution. So, it’s basically two idiotic metaphysical belief systems duking it out — grab the popcorn and have a good laugh, but don’t take sides in the idiocy.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 11:08 am Patriarch

        Since you’ve figured out evolution isn’t true, maybe you could enlighten us as to how life really works.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 11:45 am Grim

        One need only to watch *any* animal species, either on Animal Planet or you can watch squirrels or birds in your back yard, to know that all sex in the animal kingdom is rapelike. Not in a bad way as the feminists say, but in the way that the female resists and must be taken (as she biologically wants to happen). With squirrels and birds, the female literally runs and must be caught by the male. With humans, chimps, and lions, the female sort of puts up a fight but eventually turns around and turns up her ass. In other words, all sex in the animal kingdom is date rape and light bondage with an approved lover. #factsforyoutoday.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:05 pm Patriarch

        You forgot the part where you have to geta notarized affidavit documenting consent.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:42 pm Amy

        Older women get raped all the time, and how would you know what a rapist looks for? How would you even know the mindset?

        I don’t know what the feminists mean when they say rape is about power as much as sex, but I’m not trying to paint all men as evil rapists– it’s the exact opposite. If rape is only about sex, and all men want sex, then why aren’t all men rapists?? I’m saying they aren’t because it’s about sex and something else– a need for power expressed in a pathologically sick way.

        Looking at it another way… assume that starting tomorrow, all rape laws were taken off the books. Rape was completely legalized. Are you going to go out tomorrow night and grab some woman in an alley? I’m sure you wouldn’t, even though your sex drive is just as high as any other guy’s. You have a conscience and you don’t have that sick need to hurt someone to feel powerful. This is what I’m getting at when I say it can’t be just about sex.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 10:24 pm FamilyMan

        Rape is somewhat about power, mainly because sex is somewhat about power. The normal gender roleplay has the man exerting some power and the woman being receptive.

        And of course if the man is supposed to ask explicit permission at each step, forget about anyone getting pregnant. It’s such a turnoff that he’d be limp and she’d be be dry if they ever got that far.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 7:04 am Suburban_elk

        “and it [rape] is about power just as much as sex”

        Under what circumstances does sex occur without power?

        In consensual sex, the woman by her very nature (with her pussy) compels the man – she exercises power over him.

        In non-consensual sex otherwise known as rape, the man compels the woman – he exercises power over her.

        In both cases – in all cases – sex is encased in power.

        So the statement that rape is about power as much as sex is actually true, but it is meaningless, or perhaps misleading. It is meaningless according to the above analysis, which i think is irrefutable.

        But the statement is more telling in how it would mislead.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 10:27 pm FamilyMan

        I don’t feel compelled by a pussy. It usually sits there and waits for me to penetrate it or do whatever.

        If I can’t get the pussy when I want it, I have my right hand. Therefore I am not compelled.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 7:21 am Suburban_elk

        As for how the statement, Rape is more about power than it is about sex, would mislead.

        Such a statement is a plea to a man to relinquish his violent ways, a somewhat subtle protest for him to forego his animal nature, which is the force of strength and capacity for violence, with an appeal to virtuous and sympathetic latencies.

        How that statement is even effective in getting a man to relinquish what power he has – he should be emphatically affirming that sex is about power! – is a grave sign that he has lost it.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:45 pm thwack

        On a serious note, I do have a simple theory on rape pregnancy that Im surprised no one else has mentioned?

        (Disclaimer: I have not, nor do I intend to ever rape a woman. Nor support, council and/or provide aid or assistance technical or otherwise to any person engaging is such behavior… you get the picture?)

        Here goes:

        A rapist THINKS he only gets one shot to fuck this one woman, one time. Therefore, all his sexual behaviors get exagerated due to not only all of the above, but the very real possibility he may be killed shortly after the act (by someone using their bare hands)

        In other words, a rapist will fuck his wife or girlfriend differently than he fucks his victim.

        “In life, theres only two peices of pussy that count; your last and your next” –Richard Pryor

        LikeLike


  25. on January 7, 2014 at 3:10 pm V

    “…the smile is stashed lest the men risk an accidental tell of submission.”

    Leo is an actor who most likely submitted on the casting couch as a boy.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 4:17 pm democratsarefascists

      LOL. And still does.

      LikeLike


  26. on January 7, 2014 at 3:13 pm earl

    He did manage to pull this scene off after actually cutting his hand without missing a beat. So I wouldn’t call him a total effeminate.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:16 pm earl

      I meant this scene.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:51 pm Arbiter

        Yes earl, he is good at dishing out Hollywood’s socialist propaganda in order to get money. He follows those in power without question. Oh, and he cut his hand a little without crying. Totally badass.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:59 pm David

        How long has Quentin Tarantino been a cuckold fetishist for?

        How many years has it been since he’s been able to get a boner without staring at a black dude’s dick?

        I’d say early 1990’s, at least. What a self-hating freak.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:10 pm democratsarefascists

        Truth.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:41 pm Greg Eliot

        You think his tripe would have been touted this far and wide otherwise?

        The men behind the curtain luuuuvvv this kind of director/writer… provides them with plausible deniability in re “YKW controls Hollywood”, while having the extra bonus of the usual suspect agenda perpetuated with even greater gusto than, well, usual.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:43 pm corvinus

        Yes, QT is a total omega.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:48 pm thwack

        He has an extra bone in his foot.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:06 pm Patriarch

        He also has an extra bone in his rectum, nightly.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 3:22 pm FamilyMan

        There is fake blood you know. Is there some reason to think that was real blood?

        LikeLike


  27. on January 7, 2014 at 3:19 pm PA

    One would think we’d see such squarings off every four years at primary and presidential debates… but instead we get Al huffing and Mitt puffing.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 5:13 pm Matthew King

      … all over Hillary’s dick

      LikeLike


  28. on January 7, 2014 at 3:25 pm Anonymous

    Try reading the entire article. Putin said that Jews heavily influenced some really terrible policy, but still persecuted other Jews, as well as Christians, Muslims, etc., alike. So the conspiracy in which people collectively blame “the Jews” for everything still don’t make any sense, as “the Jews” are not some united, cohesive group. It’s like saying “the Whites” — meaningless. Being White doesn’t make you part of some ridiculous club.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 3:39 pm Greg Eliot

      So, because a few fellow Jews died at the hands of their racial,
      albeit-less-religious, brethren, the entire Bolshevik blood-debt is forgiven?

      Try again, Heimie.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:56 pm Arbiter

        Very few died. Ayn Rand (real name Alisa Zinov’yevna Rosenbaum) told of how Bolsheviks came into her father’s store and vandalized it. But they didn’t kill him or arrest him.

        Anti-Semitism was punished by death in the Soviet Union.

        While Trotsky (real name Lev Davidovich Bronshtein) turned a synagogue into a warehouse, it wasn’t anti-Semitic. It was anti-religion. For the same reason Zionist proselytizing was banned in the early Soviet Union, because they wanted their brethren to stay with them and build a paradise for themselves in Russia, not in Palestine.

        During the takeover (financed by “capitalist” brethren in the West like Schiff and Aschberg), communist followers could commit almost any crime without being punished. They committed gang rapes and mass murder. BUT, they were explicitly forbidden to commit acts of violence against Jews, unless attacked themselves. No other group got this protection.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 3:59 pm thwack

        Greg, Maybe its similar to when I talk about racism and use the term “white people” to describe the source of the problem. I have to assume the listener understands which white people Im refering to.

        Because you know what they say?

        Politics makes for strange bedfellows

        (no homo)

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 5:46 pm Carlos Danger

        Hitler killed a lot of Germans too.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 4:26 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Being White doesn’t make you part of some ridiculous club.

      Exactly. That’s what we discussed at the last meeting of the Patriarchy.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 4:43 pm Greg Eliot

        Touche’

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:15 pm Greg Eliot

        I’m converting our Protocols from MS Word to a pdf file as we speak.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 5:30 pm Carlos Danger

      If I’m guilty for slavery and the Holocaust, then you’re guilty for the Bolsheviks and Slavery, since the Tribe controlled the slave trade. Vlad soft peddling the criticism doesn’t change anything. Nazis are amateurs compared to the Tribe.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:08 pm SFG

        Sorry, Stalin was a Georgian.

        And no, I don’t hold you responsible for the Holocaust, even if you think it was a good idea. 😉

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:27 pm Carlos Danger

        All of his willing executioners were J-wish. 10 million were killed before Stalin ever came to power.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:23 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Well if they want to lay that on me, then I’ll also take credit for ending slavery, defeating the Nazis and all the stuff white people do that makes our life so pleasurable.

        LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 3:53 pm F

      You’re assuming that your facts are accurate and not written for purpose. Because it is so easily rewritten, history unfortunately requires hard proof. Citing a paragraph or book is not enough, unless you are citing documentation of the aforementioned evidence.

      LikeLike


  29. on January 7, 2014 at 3:27 pm Tilikum

    “super alpha males tend to give each other a wide berth in their natural habitats”

    this is a critical distinction for a newbie to get real fast.

    LikeLike


  30. on January 7, 2014 at 3:37 pm YaReally

    I heart Leo, but Putin is sizing Leo up and Leo is wondering how Putin sees him. ie – Leo is concerned with how he’s being perceived by Putin instead of forcing Putin to be concerned with how Leo perceives him, and Putin has no fucks to give about how Leo views him, and is looking at him like he’s deciding Leo’s worth as a man.

    In short: Leo is very subtly reacting to Putin. Ergo Putin wins.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 7:22 pm Nomennovum

      Agreed. DiCaprio, like Putin is ramrod straight, but Leo looks a little less comfortable than the Russian leader. DiCaprio — and we — know who has the higher status.

      The women still want to fuck Leo, though. It’s just that everyone is looking at him because he just met big bad Val and they want to see how he’ll do.

      We’re talking degrees of status here and both men have tons to spare. The rest of us are turdlets in comparison. This is an awesome photo.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:20 pm Nomennovum

        Sorry, Val, you rutting cunt. I meant Vlad the cunning runt.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 11:48 pm YaReally

        “We’re talking degrees of status here and both men have tons to spare.”

        ya, Leo has probably banged more/hotter chicks (cue the joke about how when Leo looks thru a Victoria Secret catalog he’s picking out his next date), but in terms of overall manly alphaness Putin wins it.

        At the same time, like you said, this is such a minute difference…but people (especially women) notice it instinctively. It really comes down to who’s more “on” by 0.01% that day.

        That’s why the keyboard hockey worry of “well what if two guys had the exact same amount of game but one was tall and rich and good looking huh???” is stupid…because that never happens. There’s ALWAYS one person reacting more to the other person and that can change minute to minute depending on external factors like the environment and internal factors like state. Even with two alphas with game it’ll come down to “who’s in a better/more solo mood that day”…

        One person is always reacting more to the other even if, like in Putin and Leo’s case, it’s a minuscule difference.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 11:50 pm YaReally

        *jockey, and solid not solo. I must still be drunk.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 3:25 pm FamilyMan

        I don’t think there’s a day when Putin would be submissive to a movie actor.

        LikeLike


  31. on January 7, 2014 at 3:37 pm Eikos

    Igor Artemov wrote:

    Putin destroys Russia with unprecedented speed.

    Multiculturalism (“multinationality”) is the official Putin ideology. Ten years ago there were virtually no alien migrants in Russia. Now there are 15 millions of them, mostly Central Asians—10% of the total population. Most of them are males of military age. In Moscow they commit around a half of all violent crimes. Moscow is no longer a Russian city.

    Now not a single month passes without some minor ethnic riot occurring in some part of the country, triggered by the depressingly similar scenario: a migrant kills a Russian, police either let the murderer go or don’t do anything, local authorities blame Russians for xenophobia, locals arise and protest. This is in fact good development as Russians learn that only rioting makes authorities listen. Unfortunately, as a result, the most active members of such events then go to prison.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 5:04 pm irishsavant

      Correct.

      LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 6:14 pm corvinus

      Central Asians (specifically, Uzbeks, Tajiks, and Kyrgyz) number 600,000 according to the latest census of 2010, compared to 270,000 in 2002. Turkmen aren’t allowed to freely immigrate because Turkmenistan is not in the CIS, and Kazakhs don’t immigrate because Kazakhstan has oil wealth. Chinese number about 30,000. Many Caucasus peoples are Russian citizens, because Russia doesn’t want to give up Chechnya and Dagestan — I guess this is one pragmatic reason for the multicult, unfortunate as it may be. Armenians (1 million) and Azeris (600,000) are not.

      So while the census has likely undercounted the alien hordes in Russia, I don’t see how they can be anywhere near the 15 million figure cited here.

      Putin may be an idiot in allowing Central Asians to immigrate, but they are nowhere near as numerous as the Latinos in the USA, or even just the Pakistanis in the UK (let alone the blacks and other muzzies).

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 6:14 pm corvinus

        *Armenians (1 million) and Azeris (600,000) are not, and are numerous, but their numbers are stable.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 6:29 pm Carlos Danger

      I don’t understand the politics behind this. I am also aware of this going on, especially in regard to Chechens.

      LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 10:42 pm Inane Rambler (@UnendImprov)

      Serious question: How much of that Central Asian immigration is Russian? Russians lived in every SSR of the old Soviet Union, and in Kazakhstan and a few other places were the largest minority.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 11:22 pm corvinus

        According to the Wikipedia demographics articles, Russians numbered about 10.3 million in Central Asia and the Caucasus republics in 1989. Unfortunately, not all the countries have had censuses since then, but judging from those that have, we can say that well more than half of their Russians have said Do Svidanya. They’re somewhat less likely to abandon Kazakhstan, but the more remote republics like Tajikistan have seen nearly all their Europeans up and leave.

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 3:18 am Arbiter

      Yes, Putin has also supported laws meant to strangle nationalist parties economically and in other ways. Forbidding various opinions.

      I read of one case where nationalists handed out fliers, and the police came and picked them up, drove them to the police station for a “talk” even though they had done nothing wrong. This will not make the most experienced members stop their activity, but it will make newer members afraid and ruin their enthusiasm. Building a new movement is a fragile endeavor that needs enthusiasm, and under Putin the police make sure to take that away.

      Putin has Jews in his government, or at least he used to. When he was in Spain one time, he visited a wealthy Jewish businessman in his villa. So while the twelve oligarchs Putin threw out from the country were mostly Jewish (at least eight of them were, Berezovsky being the most influential of the oligarchs), it seems he did so for the same reason Stalin eliminated a lot of the Jewish cadre at the top of the party: he would simply get rid of anyone who was a rival for power.

      Putin has improved the Russian economy greatly. And he has been a thorn in the side of the globalists in Washington and Tel Aviv, e.g. by helping Iran a little, holding joint military exercises with China, opposing the Washington-funded “color revolutions” and the NGOs behind them, and helping Syria where Russia has a Mediterranean naval base. This makes the neocons and other globalists freak out. But at the same time, Putin oppresses nationalists. He is simply a third party. As so often in history, a Russian leader plays his own separate game.

      LikeLike


  32. on January 7, 2014 at 3:44 pm corvinus

    DiCaprio is one of the few prettyboy heartthrobs who did manage to morph into a decent action star. But his libtardery gives Putin the edge intrinsically.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 8:29 pm Mob Barley

      He flew in from America with 2 diverted landings to donate $ to save tigers. Putin lol’ed

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 4:10 pm FamilyMan

        Yes he said that makes Leo a real man. Such talk is believed only by someone who doesn’t know what a real man is.

        That, plus naming him “little man” and telling it meant “macho man” pointing out Leo’s not speaking the language, was just a string of insults at Leo that he may just now be unraveling if he’s not entirely surrounded by yesmen.

        LikeLike


  33. on January 7, 2014 at 3:53 pm Remy Sheppard

    It’s always interesting to look at pictures like this. You really do wonder what’s going through their minds.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 4:08 pm democratsarefascists

      Don’t have to wonder with Leo. There’s nothing in there. The gerbil in his mind’s exercise wheel died in his teens.

      LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 4:14 pm Svetlana Svetlana

      Look at this photograph
      Everytime I do it makes me laugh
      What could Putin be like in bed
      Does diCaprio want to give him head?

      LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 10:48 pm Patriarch

      I’m wondering what went through your mind when you decided to put your face in your avatar.

      LikeLike


  34. on January 7, 2014 at 4:00 pm Arbiter

    Putin – Forced the twelve oligarchs to flee to London and Tel Aviv by prosecuting them in any way he could come up with. Both freed and managed the economy at the same time in a softer transfer to a market economy, thereby tripling avg. purchasing power in Russia in just a few years. (Which is why he gets elected over and over again, but the media will never tell you that.)

    DiCaprio – Decent performance in Catch Me If You Can. Loyal slave to his J masters in Hollywood, says anything that will please them, picks up every socialist cause that they like, while of course staying far away from saying anything good about the Palestinians, who by official leftist logic should be getting his favorable attention.

    In a comparison between a free man and a slave, the free man wins.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 4:45 pm Greg Eliot

      As good a summation as any. +1

      LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 7:58 am Petr Akuleyev

      Putin IS a leftist, you dolt. He believes in a state controlled economy, handouts to the working class, massive government bureacracies, a multicultural state incorporating Islam on an equal footing with Russian Orthodoxy, and firmly believes Stalin was a great man. Just because he believes in bashing fags and Jews shouldn’t be enough to make him a conservative hero.

      LikeLike


  35. on January 7, 2014 at 4:06 pm Anon

    To me it seems like the reason everyone has their eyes on Leo is because he is kind of like an outsider in this situation. Everyone feels like he has to prove himself. Those looks are not of amazement but of doubt. They are thinking, “Is he gonna break or not?”

    LikeLike


  36. on January 7, 2014 at 4:20 pm vagittarius

    oh shit new banner. the chateau has got the kinkade glow lol

    LikeLike


  37. on January 7, 2014 at 4:35 pm MK

    Not many can outstage Putin in a photo op but George W Bush ALWAYS did. No fan of his in most other respects but he had presence.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 8:33 pm Mob Barley

      An interesting point. I noticed that Bush comes across as such a brain dead cheerful monkey patting Putin on his shoulders in all the photos, Putin doesn’t really know what to do with him.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 3:20 am Arbiter

        Bush really did look like a chimp. As the socialists liked to point out. Of course, no one is allowed to make the same comparison with Obama, because that would be “racist”.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:56 pm thwack

        Arbiter

        Bush really did look like a chimp. As the socialists liked to point out. Of course, no one is allowed to make the same comparison with Obama, because that would be “racist”.
        ——————————————————————————————

        I beg your pardon?

        If you are a white person, you hafta become PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATE, before anybody compares you to a chimp.

        In contrast, the average black person gets the monkey treatment starting in elementary school; and it never ends, even if they become PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

        What country you from?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:59 am MK

        He used a high energy approach and indifference plus his size really took up space and he wasn’t afraid to use it. I am not saying he’d beat Putin in a fight he didn’t need to he just really out photo PR’d the hell out of him which is especially impressive given other pics we have seen with Putin and leaders.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 4:15 pm FamilyMan

        Breaching personal space like that doesn’t impress everyone. But Bush did it with a smile, that big bully!

        LikeLike


  38. on January 7, 2014 at 4:41 pm Lee

    It’s not a “fair” fight. Putin has too many advantages. He didn’t rise to the top from the guts of the KGB for no reason: no telling how many alpha males Putin has outmaneuvered or had killed.

    The Bolshevik regime was created by Jews. There are still people who don’t know this in 2014?

    Putin, FWIW, is a committed philo-Semite and supporter of western-style plutocracy. Putin hasn’t done much for Russia.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 5:34 pm Carlos Danger

      Most don’t know that factoid about the Bolsheviks. It has been carefully and tenaciously kept from sight.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 5:44 pm Lew

        Karl Marx was, uh, “German.”

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:46 pm Greg Eliot

        And, uh, Jewish.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 10:03 pm Lew

        No, Marx was German, and Trotsky was Russian. It says so in my history books. The American banker Jacob Schiff who helped the Bolshevik side was from Germany, too. Litvinov and Kamanev were Russian. So was Ilya Ehrenburg.

        Jews din do nuffin. Jews never do nuffin. What the hell is wrong with you? Winston Churchill was wrong when he observed that Jews were the “driving” force behind Bolshevism.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:05 pm Greg Eliot

        I see what you did there… DUH on me. :embarrassed:

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 10:20 pm Lew

        There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews.

        Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders…

        In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding.

        And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.

        The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary.

        The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many nonJews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

        (“Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.” ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.)

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 11:54 pm Arbiter

        Yes, those are Winston Churchill’s words in the Illustrated Sunday Herald. He also wanted a Whites-only immigration policy for Britain after WWII, being deeply concerned about immigration from the colonies, so he was clearly a Nazist and secret Hitler admirer and can’t be trusted.

        He also supported eugenics and helped write the Mental Deficiency Act of 1913. He wanted forced sterilization of the feeble-minded, but that Hitleresque part of the law was voted down:

        http://researchlist.blogspot.se/2011/07/life-of-winston-churchill.html

        This German infiltrator, Churchill, said that “in Fascism, Mussolini has found the antidote to Communism.” He called Mussolini “the Roman genius … the greatest lawgiver among men.”

        Luckily his thinking was eventually straightened out. He lost a great deal of money in his “wild years” and risked losing the family mansion. But in 1936 he received 50,000 pounds (that was a lot of money at the time) from Bernard Waley Cohen, a millionaire from the esteemed Board of Jewish Deputies in England, and the leader of the Jewish pressure group “The Focus”. Cohen wrote about this in his memoirs. Churchill’s family mansion was saved by the charitable Jew Henry Strakosch, an immigrant from Nazified Austria. Indeed, when Strakosch died in 1943 he left Churchill 20,000 additional pounds.

        So how can anyone quote Churchill’s observations about the Jewish dominance of the Bolshevik leadership cadre, without noting his admirable servitude to the Jewish cause sixteen years later? The selfless, no-strings-attached donations from some of Britain’s wealthiest men, who happened to be Jewish, made him see the light. No longer would he make anti-Semitic or pro-fascist remarks, but would instead help bring about the defeat of Germany and the salvation of Eastern Europe through the Soviet Union.

        The East Europeans could stop worrying about both fascism and democracy as the Soviets took over their burdensome administration, a service they would hopefully carry out for Western Europe as well given enough time. Yes, even in Churchill’s beloved Britain. Churchill’s noble actions to this end speak louder than silly words from the 1920s. We must not fault him for noting facts he should not know way back in 1920, when we know that he saw the light and stopped talking about such things later, thanks to the generosity of a few Jewish gentlemen. I only wish that these gentlemen and their actions could be included in school textbooks, so that they can receive the recognition they so well deserve.

        LikeLike


  39. on January 7, 2014 at 4:51 pm WHO CARES?

    Dude, you are a faggot.

    obsessing like a fangirl over men like this… dottingly analyzing every speck of them.

    you are a lesser man for it.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 8:06 pm Nomennovum

      If you’re going to insult someone using a seldom-used word like “doting,” at least fucking spell it right. Also, you seem to have forgotten the purpose of this blog is *precisely* to analyze every “speck” of masculinity. Jaysus, what a fookin idjit.

      LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 1:06 am Jay in DC

      doting? So… over 50 then, innit? Or a REALLY well read bookworm omega over 30. Either way… swwwwwweeeeeettttt post. Defintitely changed my thoughts 100% with your strong arguments and points.

      LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 4:20 pm FamilyMan

      I’m over 50, and I’ve known how to spell that word ever since I was over about 10.

      LikeLike


  40. on January 7, 2014 at 5:07 pm Alec Leamas

    It’s a trick question. They’re both waiting for Silvio Berlusconi to arrive.

    LikeLike


  41. on January 7, 2014 at 5:23 pm adamsunderground

    Why does Leo yell so much?

    Alpha actors assert their alphaness with amplitude.

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 5:55 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

      Perhaps said actors are over-compensating?

      LikeLike


  42. on January 7, 2014 at 5:53 pm Oswald Spengler

    “I’m a world famous actor…an Academy Award nominee and nine time Golden Globe Award winner.”

    “If I wished…I could have you killed before tomorrow and no one would ever be the wiser.”

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 1:09 am Jay in DC

      This. The contest is just smoke and mirrors. That being said, I don’t take away from DiCaprio. Actors, musicians, artists, etc. have been slaying pussy since at least the Billy Shakespeare era, and that has value.

      But MEN have been slaying men since the same time frame and also get to slay pussy as a side effect so they are not comparable in any way.

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 4:24 pm FamilyMan

        I agree but I have some doubt about the value of the comparison. It’s not like one can choose whether to be like Putin or like DiCaprio, deciding early in life to pursue one path or the other.

        Well Reagan did both. People laugh at his acting but I watched a bit of it and it seems fine, no reason to think DiCaprio is any better or even as good. Reagan was sometimes subtle, DiCaprio doesn’t have that.

        LikeLike


  43. on January 7, 2014 at 5:53 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

    Putin, no contest. He’s got that “show me what you’ve got you yankee motherfucker” look in his eyes and stance. Bravo.

    LikeLike


  44. on January 7, 2014 at 5:57 pm Denise

    Don’t forget – Leo may not have named any Self Chosen – but he refused to convert Judaism to marry Israeli model Bar Refaeli, when her mega-shekels Business tycoon daddy demanded he do so. Leo just walked away. And has dated a number of leggy Aryan gals ever since.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 5:20 am Lara

      If he had converted, she’d have lost respect, and likely dumped him anyway.

      LikeLike


  45. on January 7, 2014 at 6:09 pm forks_make_us_fat

    Leo has his part in ‘Titanic’ and Putin has his umbrella…

    LikeLike


  46. on January 7, 2014 at 6:41 pm The Fantasy Relationship Between Jews an Negroes | The White Tea Room

    […]  and read the article he reposted from Chateau Hartiste, https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/01/07/when-alpha-males-square-off/   re: the “Alpha Male Squaring Off-Out” of Vladimir Putin and Leonardo DiCaprio. […]

    LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 4:30 pm FamilyMan

      The African refugees are rioting in Tel Aviv lately. Israel is trying to throw them out because obviously they are not really refugees, and they don’t want to go. Business owners have mixed feelings, some hate losing the cheap labor. I had a link and could find it again if anyone’s interested.

      LikeLike


  47. on January 7, 2014 at 6:47 pm Dan

    Advantage Putin especially because Leo had to suck about 8 dicks to get his role on Growing Pains…..believe me, I KNOW

    LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 4:35 pm F

      How do you know?

      LikeLike


  48. on January 7, 2014 at 7:34 pm AlphaBeta

    Putin must be really short, dicaprio is only like 6ft

    LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 4:30 pm FamilyMan

      I think he’s about 5’6″, and Medvedev is a couple inches shorter.

      LikeLike


  49. on January 7, 2014 at 7:36 pm kfg

    “Keep that drink by your waist”

    That is his waist. Men wearing girl’s hip hugger pants has distorted your body image.

    LikeLike


  50. on January 7, 2014 at 7:38 pm MercifulBoss

    This isn’t related to the Putin/DiCaprio discussion. It is a girl question.

    I was daygaming at the mall a while ago, go this girls number and took some photos with her and me in the photo for social proof. She opened me on facebook we talked for a bit, I tried to get her out but she found excuses and never went out with me.

    Today I was fucking around on Facebook and she opens me saying, “like my photo of me getting kissed?”, its a photo of her sitting at her computer while some random dude kisses her on the cheek.

    I didn’t reply (seems like an attention whore to me — I don’t like enabling attention whores).

    Was this the correct move, or should I have said something non-commital like, “cool”? The silence could be interpreted like butthurtedness?

    LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 7:51 pm FreshPrinceOfDoom

      go with “cool…?”

      LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 7:56 pm Nomennovum

      Silence can seldom be interpreted as butthurtedness. Saying “cool” is lame. You’ve been blown off. I’d forget her.

      Or you could respond, “lol.” That’ll get her spinning.

      LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:15 pm MercifulBoss

        That’s what I figured. I shall forever hold my peace.

        A quick question, in what instances is silence considered butthurtedness?

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:36 pm Mob Barley

        Never. Never. Never.

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 8:38 pm Nomennovum

        If she makes it clear she is really interested in you rather than in taunting you with cuntish pix. What she is doing is the worst sort of shit test.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 4:45 am Mike

        Agree with never

        LikeLike


      • on January 7, 2014 at 11:39 pm YaReally

        I second “lol”. Send it, just lol and nothing else not even punctuation. Then radio silence for a week no matter what she says in response to your lol.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 3:23 am Arbiter

        I don’t like “lol”. It shows that he wants to get back at her. That shows she got to him. He should have so much to do in his life and so many women to go out with that he doesn’t have time on his hands to answer every single question that comes along.

        She is asking him a question that has nothing to do with him, a question that is only about her life. Whatever he answers he would be reacting instead of acting. He did the right thing by not replying.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 5:11 am Nomennovum

        “It shows that he wants to get back at her.”

        That’s the thing with “lol”: It is ambiguous. She will twist herself into knots trying to figure out what it means … but what it *doesn’t* mean is butthurtedness. And he *does* want her, don’t forget, so this response is good chickbait.

        As I said, though. I wouldn’t answer the scrunt or communicate with her ever again, because I wouldn’t want to game such a nasty piece of work (short of an unasked-for and abject apology), but that’s me.

        Also, she is not really exhibiting solipsism or attention-whoring here. She is mega-shit testing him by taunting him. His only hope is that she is trying to make him jealous, but I am not so sure about that. What I *am* sure about is that the bitch would not be worth it for me regardless of her motivations.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 6:10 am YaReally

        “That’s the thing with “lol”: It is ambiguous. She will twist herself into knots trying to figure out what it means”

        “lol” will mean to her whatever she hopes it DOESN’T mean.

        If she wants him to be jealous, she’ll think the “lol” is him not giving a fuck and just laughing at her silly attempt to make him jealous. If she wants him to chase her, she’ll think the “lol” is him refusing to chase her. If she wants him to qualify himself, she’ll think the “lol” is him refusing to qualify himself. If she wants him to like her, she’ll think the “lol” means he’s mad at her or done with her shit. If she thinks her test is super sneaky, she’ll think the “lol” is him knowing exactly what she’s up to and calling her out on it.

        That’s why you add radio silence for a week. She responds with something like “?”, “what does that mean?”, or “are you mad?” and instead of a response she gets a week to wonder wtf the “lol” meant and whether he’s still into her or mad at her or what.

        Not responding at all is alright, but it would be passing up an opportunity to build attraction/drama and send her on an emotional rollercoaster.

        Like I’ve said before, with shit-tests, you CAN respond to them by just staring at the girl and not saying anything, and that won’t kill attraction, it may even build it slightly…but being able to say/do something that fucks with her head obliterating her shit-test will build a ton more attraction.

        If you ask her, say, “Do you cook?” and she goes “No, I hate cooking!”, you CAN just stare at her in silence and hopefully if you have value she might qualify herself with a “…well, I mean, sometimes I like to.” You can also say something like “Oh, that’s too bad, I like a girl who knows how to cook.”, and that’ll force her to qualify herself, and build a bit of attraction.

        …or you can, before she finishes the word “hate”, turn and walk away without saying a word and go talk to a hotter girl in view of her.

        They’re all valid ways of handling the situation, but one of those ways will mind-fuck her hamster and build a ton more attraction. Silence is alright, it’s just not optimal.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 8:51 am Amy

        “That’s the thing with “lol”: It is ambiguous. She will twist herself into knots trying to figure out what it means … but what it *doesn’t* mean is butthurtedness. And he *does* want her, don’t forget, so this response is good chickbait.”

        This.

        LikeLike


    • on January 7, 2014 at 7:58 pm AlphaBeta

      “Is that your brother? Aww how cute”

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 9:34 am Greg Eliot

        “Was that a sore on his lip?”

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 8:06 am haunted trilobite

      Say “It’s cool that the ability to manipulate dickless chodes, that you learned as a toddler playing doctors and nurses, is still serving you well to this day. It must be a huge ego salve to get one of these eunuchs to pose in one of your self-promoting testaments to yourself. You are a true leader of men”

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 4:45 pm FamilyMan

        You probably know this already, but that’s like 10 times too long.

        LikeLike


  51. on January 7, 2014 at 8:24 pm Flip

    Looks like uber alpha Frank Sinatra had a kid in his 70s.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=ronan+farrow+looks+like+frank+sinatra&sa=X&tbm=isch&source=iu&imgil=XPv6IDd_earpDM%253A%253Bhttps%253A%252F%252Fencrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com%252Fimages%253Fq%253Dtbn%253AANd9GcQxMXr4F_2zXqdVtOi5MFjShRCjy8_v0Wze68552-Vqc_0SYpec%253B615%253B409%253BcmeQMzqkkZxIbM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.mirror.co.uk%25252F3am%25252Fcelebrity-news%25252Fronan-farrow-frank-sinatra-not-2735545&ei=ccLMUt6FG4j8qwHProCIDA&ved=0CCsQ9QEwAA&biw=1280&bih=705#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=XPv6IDd_earpDM%253A%3BcmeQMzqkkZxIbM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fi2.mirror.co.uk%252Fincoming%252Farticle2331883.ece%252FALTERNATES%252Fs615%252FSinatra-2331883.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.mirror.co.uk%252F3am%252Fcelebrity-news%252Fronan-farrow-frank-sinatra-not-2735545%3B615%3B409

    LikeLike


  52. on January 7, 2014 at 8:52 pm Joe Sixpack

    -Who would you rather fight in a bare-knuckle cage match?

    -Who would you rather be lost in the woods with, only a pocketknife and half a canteen of water to get you back to civilization?

    -Who can you picture leading a platoon of soliders into combat or a militia of disgruntled civilians when the Shit Hits the Fan?

    Leo reminds me of the scrawny, koolaid-drinking, butthurt crybaby who angrily belches out easily-debunked left-wing talking points as spittle forms at the corner of his mouth.

    Without acting as his DHV, he would never have had the luxury of preaching the myths of climate change while unleashing carbon footprint hell into the stratosphere private-jetting around the globe. Without Hollwood money, he would never have been able to air his outrage against income inequality while sunnbathing on the yachts of billionaires with topless models.

    No, he’d be a bed-wetting kidult, still sleeping in a squeaky twin bed in his childhood bedroom, bitchily snapping at his mommy for buying Fruity Pebbles instead of Fruit Loops. A regular on the LA rave scene, tweeting selfies of himself, his glowsticks and pacifier.

    Game. Set. Match. Vlad Mutherfuckin’ Putin.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 3:28 am Arbiter

      The third question there reminds me of something I often think of politicians. “If an overwhelming invasion came today, would this man fight in the resistance or join the invaders?”

      Of course creatures like Obama, Hillary, Bill Clinton, Bush etc would join the invaders. They would talk themselves blue about how great it was for America to be helped by the newcomers in this or that make-believe crisis. Likewise Obama, Hillary, Bill Clinton and Bush would have fought with the redcoats against the Patriots during the American Revolution.

      Democracy is hostile to true heroic leaders, since heroic leaders won’t go along with the media clique’s dictates and therefore won’t stand a chance in elections.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 3:43 pm Carlos Danger

        Most of Athens greatest men were eventually destroyed by their political enemies.

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 10:11 am PR

      -Who would you rather be lost in the woods with, only a pocketknife and half a canteen of water to get you back to civilization?

      DiCaprio. half a canteen isn’t enough to share and I’d rather shiv him than get shivved by Putin.

      LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 4:50 pm FamilyMan

      I didn’t know he was into all those causes. (Shows how much I follow Hollywood.)

      Now I don’t even think Leo is alpha. He’s a slave to his masters in the Frankfurt school, they’ve put him in a very prominent PR role and reward him well for selling his soul (whatever there was of it) to them.

      No wonder Putin insulted him with a smile. Putin despises the little weasel, who happens to live in a physical body larger than his, not that the body size matters.

      LikeLike


  53. on January 7, 2014 at 8:59 pm Warrior_savant

    Not sure if this is the super-alpha contest Leo wants to try and win.

    After all, we have a former teen-heart throb turned Hollywood megastar vs. a poor kid with dreams of Stalinistic control who climbed his way up the ranks of the KGB and into the throne of the Kremlin.
    How many throats did Leo slit to get to where he is? How many poor bastards did he have shipped off to Siberia? Zero you say? That’s Correct.

    How many has Vlad had “sent away”? Probably plenty.

    Leo’s only saving grace in that showdown would be that America would miss him.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 3:36 am Arbiter

      “who climbed his way” – Putin threw out the oligarchs and tripled the average Russian purchasing power in just a few years. That matters a whole lot to Russians. He can’t be described in black-and-white terms as people insist in doing.

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 7:52 am Petr Akuleyev

        Putin threw out the oligarchs who wanted some independence from government interference, but the ones who put him on his throne are doing just fine. Putin is pretty much just a white Alpha version of Obama – all power to the state, crush private initiative, give menial jobs to foreigners to weaken the working class. All you need to do is look at the number of Tajiks and other Central Asians running around Moscow – Putin sold out the Russian people for cash. Majority Muslim Russian cities like Kazan and Ufa are thriving while ethnic Russian cities like Petersburg and Perm languish. While the Chinese build highways, a space program and global companies, Putin builds dachas and Winter Olympic villages in a subtropical resort. I’ll take a Chinese beta over a Russian alpha any day if I want people running my country.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 4:53 pm FamilyMan

        Xi Jinping seems pretty alpha to me, relaxed confidence. Hu Jintao was more beta perhaps — but perhaps not, it’s a ball-bashing competition they win to emerge on top of the Party, same as it always was.

        LikeLike


  54. on January 7, 2014 at 11:12 pm Libertardian

    https://witchwind.wordpress.com/2013/12/15/piv-is-always-rape-ok/

    “Just to recall a basic fact: Intercourse/PIV is always rape, plain and simple.”

    Pfft. Given how many sexless betas are being churned out of the fembot indoctrination programs formerly known as “K-12 education” and “the workplace”, this is the last thing she ought to worry about. She needs to start focusing on the next battle, namely to get “being born with a Y chromosome” recognized as rape.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 3:39 am Arbiter

      No worries. Feminists already say that all men are responsible for all rapes, because rape is part of our “structural oppression” of women. The same structural oppression we have against homosexuals, immigrants and workers. Though that part about the workers is something they only pay occasional lip service to nowadays. (Listen to socialist academicians in private, and they truly hate and fear the workers, who have evil opinions such as thinking the death penalty is okay for heinous crimes.)

      LikeLike


  55. on January 7, 2014 at 11:12 pm Samia

    Oh, FFS, an actor isn’t even a real human being, much less an alpha male. Professional liars with good looks and nothing more.

    LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 5:00 pm FamilyMan

      This. Now it is theoretically possible for them to be human beings too, but that seldom happens in real life at least in Hollywood.

      LikeLike


  56. on January 8, 2014 at 12:11 am Errol Flynn

    I can’t see how any White man who willingly conforms to the current anti-White system (ie. Dicaprio) can be considered “alpha”, regardless of how many equally useless women he can bed.

    Our anscestors would barely recognize as a human being let alone alpha.

    LikeLike


  57. on January 8, 2014 at 12:46 am Gro Haila

    “On Tribal payroll”

    This being the country of what the ” meaning of is, is” and where zhyds were unwanted interlopers before they become “what WWII was fought for” and now I see drifting back to “menace” status.

    Anyhow, I fail to see how the honcho of any nukular state and some of the largest economies (Germany, Italy) would be “on the payroll”.

    Syria, Iran? The Egyptian junta? Are Saudis on the zhyd payroll or zhyds on the Saudi payroll? And is the payroll actually “zhyd”, “yanke”, or “British”? A fellow like Morsi, is he on what payroll – see Foggybottoms displeasure at his removal.

    It’s much easier to scapegoat a funky-religion tribe “the root of all evil”, and leave it at that.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 1:18 am Jay in DC

      Let me quote thwack who is quoting Pulp Fiction–

      “My name is Pitt, and you ain’t talking your way outta this shit’.

      Said a different way— Try to convince anyone who has opened an accurate history book of what you are trying to say.

      The agenda has been buried a few times in history, but it always resurfaces much to the detriment of the “Agendaites” who appear to be rather relentless.

      As an aside Mr. Deflection do you fail to see how a honcho of a nuclear state like the USA could be on the payroll?

      I’m certain there is no one in NYC, DC, or Congress with any vested interest in staying on the payroll. Certainly no extremely poor and non-influential political action commitee like AIPAC or the ADL who have taken a vow of poverty, and complete honesty.

      You are on the wrong website for your bullshit propaganda. Try MSNBC for the path of least resistance, and then CNN if you are feeling brave.

      LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 2:35 am Gro Haila

        Ach, my favorite capital-dwelling pursuer of Magyar kurvas.

        So POTUS is a figurehead? U don’t say? What other amazing secrets would you deign to share with me, a lowly ex-slave?

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 3:46 am Arbiter

        Gro, you were denying that the high and mighty could be on the payroll. Jay points out that they are. Then you berate him for stating what you think is obvious? In that case, why did you first claim you didn’t believe it? Strange combination of posts.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 8:00 am Gro Haila

        Look! LesTrois Craquetaires!

        The cohesion, the form, the seamlesss tagteaming. Nice. And zhyds, as recently as the last century mauled by goofs a la Schicklgruber and Djugashvilli stand a chance when ya’ll done with them?

        ‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.’

        evolves in the cracker version to:

        “When YOU use a word,’ the 3rd cracker said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”

        Hey, maybe ya’ll crackers CAN improve on the Old World masters.

        LikeLike


      • on January 8, 2014 at 12:11 pm Greg Eliot

        I see the usual suspects are here again, attempting their Puttin’ On The Ritz (crackers) routine.

        (Big hook emerges from stage left, accompanied by a shout of “NEXT!”)

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 5:05 pm FamilyMan

        Arbiter is making sense. And I don’t think personally that Jews are behind every evil in the world, but they did drive US involvement in both WWI and WWII which, in combination with the contemporaneous Russian Revolution (1917) and formation of the State of Israel (1948) left the Jews a lot better off than they would have been otherwise.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 5:14 pm Carlos Danger

        They control our foreign policy, our news media, our entertainment industry, publishing, banking and finance, the legal industry, and our best universities. We’re at their mercy.

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 3:44 am Arbiter

      Saudi Arabia’s kleptocratic leadership gets enormous U.S. support only by keeping silent about Israel’s settling of the last 22 percent of Palestinian land.

      LikeLike


  58. on January 8, 2014 at 1:04 am Gro Haila

    From ‘on the payroll’ to ‘greasing the skids’ to ‘paying homage’ to ‘tribute’/’jizya’ (as the case may be), to outright extortion, the full range of what non-comercial transactions from A to entity B may actually mean.

    LikeLike


  59. on January 8, 2014 at 2:56 am Glengarry

    Take a step back, and consider who is getting into whose orbit. Hey Leo, you can hang out at the dacha, no problem (unreadable smile). If Leo had met David Cameron it’d be the other way around, right?

    Putin has to be trolling us pretty hard, making peace in the middle east, saving the tigers and befriending the glitterati of the west. (Barry thinks: “But I wanted to all that.”)

    LikeLike


  60. on January 8, 2014 at 4:50 am Mike

    Putin all day son

    LikeLike


  61. on January 8, 2014 at 7:08 am tang3zang

    Appearances aside, Leo cares far too much for touchy feely left wing ideals. It’s hard to respect anybody like that.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 7:50 am Suburban_elk

      Can’t get rid of those tigers soon enough, huh?

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 5:07 pm FamilyMan

        wtf did you click on the wrong like to get here?

        LikeLike


      • on January 14, 2014 at 8:09 am Suburban_elk

        The occasion for the meeting of DiCaprio and Putin was the preservation of wild tigers and their habitats, which both men support.

        As you have designated yourself Officer of Ideological Conformity, FamilyMan, explain how the cause of big cats and their healthy natural environment is opposed to the ideas on this blog.

        Alternately, shut your mouth. If you had half brain, you would see some relevance in the big cats’ predicament; you miss the parallels, they do not apply to you.

        LikeLike


  62. on January 8, 2014 at 7:11 am tang3zang

    and the lefties seriously think going “lol ur gay” is a clever remark

    LikeLike


  63. on January 8, 2014 at 10:32 am Grim

    lzozlzozlzozozoz A woman is the functional president of the Miami Dolphins. Feminism won. Now a jewish bitch has literally ruined an NFL football team.

    http://miamiherald.typepad.com/dolphins_in_depth/2014/01/more-history-fallout-from-ireland-vs-dawnjoe.html

    Unbelievable. Beta men in charge (owner is as jooish as they come) have let this happen. This bitch told the head ball coach what to say and he read from cue cards!!!

    LikeLike


  64. on January 8, 2014 at 10:41 am Grim

    lzozlzozlzolzozzozo Pajamaboy II strikes again:

    http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/politics/2014/01/08/nr-stelter-roger-ailes-book.cnn.html

    serious lzoozozozoozozozoozz

    LikeLike


  65. on January 8, 2014 at 11:45 am Caramba

    Here is your “alpha” in his natural state before the jews did not allow him to have a little bit of power lol:

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 11:46 am Caramba

      i mean “allowed”

      LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 3:11 pm Carlos Danger

      Can you name a Russian politician you would support?

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 11:34 am Caramba

        Certainly,Alexey Navalny.

        Real alpha,a man with a heart of a lion (unlike Putin-the rat).He loves Russians;hates jews (unlike putin), chechens/caucasians (unlike Putin who licks ass of Kadyrov and his mauglis) and all other “brown people”(unlike Putin who imports them in masses from Central asia).

        Got a good bird too: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/files/2013/07/174000105.jpg (unliek Putin who only bangs whales like his ex,and used up crazy whores like Kabaeva).

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 5:16 pm Carlos Danger

        Well hopefully he’ll be able to out maneuver Putin, who stays in power because he has too many enemies and too much stolen wealth.

        LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 3:14 pm Carlos Danger

      We don’t have much to admire here in the gay old West. Opie, Harper, and Cameron versus Vlad. It’s no contest.

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 11:37 am Caramba

        You underestimate Cameron,my friend.It’s just not quite British to pose while “hunting” with naked torso; but Cameron is far from beta (unlike Obama for example).

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 5:17 pm Carlos Danger

        He hasn’t impressed me much. He’s a Tory Tony Blair as near as I can tell.

        LikeLike


  66. on January 8, 2014 at 11:47 am Caramba

    this is my favourite one: http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5009/22271788.350/0_90a2f_a02555f9_L

    LikeLike


  67. on January 8, 2014 at 12:55 pm Gro Haila

    A thread about Putin, is the place to talk about Russian Revolution, I suppose. While zhyd enthusiasm and support for the Revolution of the jewish community (in particular in the upper circles) can hardly be overstated, the “credit” for the Revolution and its ensuing atrocities was claimed by Berdyaev for the russian people:

    “The Russian people did not achieve their ancient dream of Moscow, the Third Rome. The ecclesiastical schism of the seventeenth century revealed that the muscovite tsardom is not the third Rome. The messianic idea of the Russian people assumed either an apocalyptic form or a revolutionary; and then there occurred an amazing event in the destiny of the Russian people. Instead of the Third Rome in Russia, the Third International was achieved, and many of the features of the Third Rome pass over to the Third International. The Third International is also a Holy Empire, and it also is founded on an Orthodox faith. The Third International is not international, but a Russian national idea.”

    Cue the three crackerteers to point out what a jew Berdyaev was.

    LikeLike


    • on January 8, 2014 at 3:09 pm Carlos Danger

      That is meaningless and pure dissimulation. The Zhyd went to great lengths to hide who really controlled the party and country and not only in the Soviet Union. Most of the Bolsheviks had Russian as their ethnicity in their passports to create this illusion. The revolution was always meant to be in the name of the Russian people and they died in large numbers for the privilege of being window dressing.

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 9:37 am Gro Haila

        Crackers, are foul creatures, Carlos, do not associate yourself with them.

        The War on Terror (the colonial police actions in Mesopotamia and Central Asia, the TSA gropeing – which I always insist on, no pornography of me, por favor), the national surveillance state (NSA, TSA-VIPR), and the “War on Drugs” would not exist without the enthusiastic backing of this States’ cracker base.

        Anything else is pure dissimulation. Wise as serpents, chum!

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 5:27 pm Carlos Danger

        We believed the lies. Now many of those same people are suspicious of what went on then and now, and whose behest and under whose control. People need to learn to filter their news and their leaders’ statements and actions and speak truth to power. You guys haven’t really been doing us any favors you know. You’ve systematically undermined and destroyed our society in order to control the wreckage.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 11:42 am Caramba

        Everyone knew who really controlled the party.Just check the names of the first communist government.Only 1 russian (Kamenev) and even he is doubtful (as the surname is quite unusual,and is translated as Son-of-stone or to be precise Steinman).Than Stalin-georgian monkey-man who could not even learn to speak proper russian till his death.

        Only when Khrushev,the crazy man,came to power-only than they started getting rid of jews bit by bit.

        But now it’s all back to 1921,the russian oligarchs and government are 90% jews.

        LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 5:20 pm Carlos Danger

        “We already have too many Abramoviches.”

        LikeLike


  68. on January 8, 2014 at 2:44 pm Blume

    Putin is a natural beta who made himself into an alpha.

    LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 11:43 am Caramba

      By using the omega tactics.

      LikeLike


      • on January 9, 2014 at 7:33 pm FamilyMan

        So maybe this whole mythology of the alpha is … mythology.

        LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 4:42 pm F

      I’m not sure on what basis a trained KGB killer and spy could be considered beta, especially in light of his position in the second half of his life. Evidence?

      What’s your day-to-day, alpha?

      LikeLike


  69. on January 8, 2014 at 8:20 pm Alex Hopkins

    Putin’s the ultimate Alpha. DiCaprio strikes a formidable Alpha stance but Putin takes him down because he’s…well….Putin. Heh heh….

    LikeLike


  70. on January 8, 2014 at 11:07 pm Peter the Shark

    “you hardly ever see a picture of Putin and immediately think “Damn, he’s a short man.”

    Bullshit. That’s the first thing you think. The guy has flop sweat he’s overcompensating so hard. Putin is a little dweeb who couldn’t hold Berlusconi’s jock strap, and is rumored to be gay on top of that. His power base in Russia consists of old ladies and government bureaucrats. Russia has turned into a white Nigeria under Putin’s rule, and Moscow is now overrun by Central Asian illegal immigrants, so Russia won’t even be white in two generations. I do not get the Putin admiration among so much of the alt-right.

    LikeLike


    • on January 9, 2014 at 11:20 am Samia

      Peter the Shark, your observations are correct, but I am not totally sold on the idea that short men are constantly “overcompensating”. My tall-ish husband is constantly saying that about any guy under 5 ft.5in. who happens to have negative qualities! LOL

      Also, a tall leader could be changing Russia negatively just as quickly as Putin is.

      LikeLike


    • on January 10, 2014 at 9:54 am Some Dude

      he hates gays and Jews so that’s good enough for your average altrighttard

      LikeLike


  71. on January 9, 2014 at 3:59 am le happy merchant

    this fucker is just 1,70m tall but looks at him like a father would at a bratty little kid.

    priceless.

    LikeLike


  72. on January 10, 2014 at 9:56 am Some Dude

    the fawning over Putin and the vitriol towards Leo in these comments is hilarious

    y’all’s a buncha microdicked faux-alpha conservitards, for real

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Carlos Danger on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Jack Silva on Shitlib Logic Trap!
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Carlos Danger on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Carlos Danger on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: