• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Top 5 Signs That A Woman Is Using You
“The Wreck Of The Beta Male Cuckold”, Performed »

The CH Boss-Secretary Sexual Strategy To Reduce Income Inequality, Increase Fertility, And Reinvigorate National Pride

January 28, 2014 by CH

Your lovable overlord CH is on record advocating the “Boss-Secretary Sexual Strategy” (BoSSS) to reduce income inequality and increase the fertility rate among the better classes.

Fisher agress with the CH diagnosis of the postmodern West that the end days of a civilization are characterized by an exaltation of deviancy (equalism) and a debasement of normalcy (sophism). We in the West long ago abandoned our barbarian ethos. In return for this “moral progress”, we have limitless pleasures of the flesh and material comforts. But we also have complacency, self-annihilating moral universalism, and infertility. Perhaps a return to barbarian values is just the medicine to save the West from a long walk in the shadow of the valley of death.

The patented CH solution to dysgenic fertility is to break the stranglehold of assortative mating by IQ that is currently aided and abetted by the helicopter parent ethos, and return to traditional pairings of powerful, high ability men with pretty but less educated and accomplished women. Call it the CH boss-secretary sexual strategy to renew Western vitality. This will increase fertility, increase total happiness, and decrease the degenerate SWPL culture monolith that is at the lead of decivilizing and ethnically cleansing great Western nations.

Silly reader, you thought it was a self-amusing exercise in hyperbole. Oh no.

Has there been an increase in positive assortative mating? Does assortative mating contribute to household income inequality? Data from the United States Census Bureau suggests there has been a rise in assortative mating. Additionally, assortative mating affects household income inequality. In particular, if matching in 2005 between husbands and wives had been random, instead of the pattern observed in the data, then the Gini coefficient would have fallen from the observed 0.43 to 0.34, so that income inequality would be smaller. Thus, assortative mating is important for income inequality. The high level of married female labor-force participation in 2005 is important for this result.

Science and CH… ♥♥♥ together!

Assortative mating is creating an Eloi-Morlock, or Elf-Orc, social stratification. People are forming credential-based blocs and seceding economically and socially if not yet politically. This cultural secession is reinforcing mutual ignorance, dampening mutual sympathies, and hollowing the natural fellow-feeling that is the bedrock foundation — the first principle — of any nation that wishes to carry forward in prosperity for the benefit of its posterity. Explosive diversity amplifies the stratification, and may have even been the fission reaction that set this immolation aflame and hardened hearts in its crucible of crisis.

The deadly chain of assortative mating must be broken for Western civilization to have a rebirth of greatness. The way to do this is the BoSSS system. BoSSS men will marry pretty secretaries or other occupationally “lowly” women instead of acquiescing to the hitch of convenience with multiple-degreed lawyercunts. The result of a generation of BoSSS is an end to the reign of meritocratic lovelessness, cognitive and geographic cocooning, and class-fueled hatred. An end to late-in-life spergs borne of the desiccated wombs of overeducated cougars. An end to the swarm of communications graduates with nothing to offer in a modern tech-centric economy. An end to… dare my heart speak it!… feminism and equalism as mass delusions rationalizing a world tearing apart.

There will be those who protest that BoSSS is dysgenic. But they operate under a misconception about how exactly women’s value in the mating market is calculated. A woman’s mate worth is not measured by her years toiling in grad school, or by her achievements, or by her ambition, or by her social connections or her business acumen. It is measured by her beauty, her femininity, and her compassion. The secretary with the blazing blue eyes, hourglass figure, and heart of gold is worth, in the abacus of men’s desire, more than a thousand meticulously credentialed globalist form factors. She is true beauty to the ascendent ugliness looming around her.

And she needn’t be dumb, either. Many sweet, charming “lower class” women are sharp as tacks, despite their mortal sin of having not willingly endured 52 years of academic mind meld to the equalist borg.

CH said it once, and says it again: It’s time to return to the old, true ways. To a courtship arena that paired established men with pretty young assistants full of adoration and admiration. It is the natural order of things, the divine prescription, when the starry-eyed lovely, already gazing in welcome submission, completes the act of her surrender to the powerful man above her. And in so doing, circles back to the wisdom of the ancients, and casts to the everlasting darkness the jackal harridans of the globo-femcunt credentialist collective.

I tell you now, break these assortative mating chains! Free! Free! Free at last! Thank God Almighty you are free at last to pursue love with a cute, worshipful underling and be a happy man again!

PS: There are plenty of reasons why CH rails against the obesity epidemic so passionately, but one is that it’s easier for high status men to date “occupationally lower” women if those women still have their exquisite figures.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Biomechanics is God, Culture, Dating, The Pleasure Principle, Ugly Truths | 243 Comments

243 Responses

  1. on January 28, 2014 at 11:08 am Anon

    If the Tom Bradys keep having kids with the Gisele Munchens, and the Bradd Pitts with the Angeline Jolies, soon they will be a different species from the morlocks at WalMart.

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 11:53 am Zombie Shane

      There are massive [unprecedented -vs- epicyclic] metaphenomena at work here, and you couldn’t even begin to touch everything in a 25,000 word essay.

      Briefly, one point, however: This “assortive” mating may not prove to have the outcomes which we expect it to have.

      In particular, the phenomenon of Asperger’s & ADHD & Autism is very, very, very real.

      In general, I am deeply suspicious of almost all research science, and especially of something which has captured the popular imagination like As/ADHD/Au.

      But that shiznat is real – it’s not some sort of mass psychosis – and the incidences of it appear to be on the increase.

      It could be that God simply chose not to design our brains [at least the current iteration of our brains] to be “too smart”.

      It could be that if the neurons & the axons & the calcium channels & the sodium channels & whatnot become too numerous and too powerful, with too many interconnections betwixt one another, then the whole system overloads and disintegrates into chaos.

      Just saying – that the future isn’t always going to prove to be exactly what we had been absolutely certain that it was going to be.

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 12:13 pm Zombie Shane

        One thing I’d suggest: My gut instinct is that Math-ish dudes mating with Math-ish chicks will often lead to disaster.

        Where Math-ish = Physics, Chemistry, serious Engineering, Comp Sci, Symbolic Logic, etc.

        You’re probably a whole lot safer if you go with e.g.

        {smart STEM dude} X {smart Humanities chick}

        Something about too much Math-ish-ness in a family seems to lead to disaster.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 12:42 pm SC

        funnily enough, one of my closest friends actually is a high functioning Autistic person. Her father is an engineer and her mother was a computer scientist. she the smartest out of all my friends (IQ 154, we went to a school for intellectually gifted children where everybody had their IQ tested)

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:05 pm OralCummings

        “…one of my closest friends…” Well? Well??? Have ye fucked her yet? Pussy!

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:16 pm Zombie Shane

        Again, just a gut instinct [although a STRONG gut instinct], but there is probably an associated phenomenon in which the more Aspergery-STEM-oriented a family becomes [over the generations], the more they tend to disappear into the darkness of their own minds, and begin to lose [from a Darwinian perspective, or, from a Lamarckian perspective, begin to FORGET] their ability to engage in acts of basic human warmth and kindness, the most fundamental of which would be the POTENT-MAN-FERTILE-WOMAN-COPULATION that leads to a live birth nine months later.

        In my own personal life, I had a hand in setting up almost all of my best friends, in Graduate School, with their current wives [and with many of their ex-wives], simply because so many of those dudes needed a certain kick in the seat of the pants [from a guy like me] in order to get the ball rolling romantically.

        Ergo my not-so-brilliant-borderline-simplistically-obvious observation would be that, in general:

        {INCREASES IN ASPERGY IQ} {DECREASES IN TOTAL FERTILITY RATE}

        And as the Aspergery geniuses become too removed from the day-to-day reality of living a life as a flesh-and-blood laboring quarrelling fighting copulating mammal, their families become more and more likely to be removed from the Tree of Life and dumped straight into extinction.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:18 pm Zombie Shane

        {INCREASES IN ASPERGY IQ} <==> {DECREASES IN TOTAL FERTILITY RATE}

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:18 pm Zombie Shane

        ASPERGY = ASPERGERY

        Ironically enough.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 11:30 am corvinus

        ZS:

        What you say makes sense, and I am and will continue to be going after what would seem to me to be “bimbos”.

        LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2014 at 5:45 am Zombie Shane

        There are smarter and dumber bimbos out there.

        I used to value IQ uber alles in a chick, but now – first and foremost – I wanna see some strong clear incontrovertible evidence of basic human warmth and kindness and decency in her heart.

        The moment I sense The Darkness in her heart, I’m outta there.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 6:53 pm little spoon

        What’s wrong with being spergy anyway? Being full out autistic is bad, but merely spergy? It does not seem *that* bad.

        [CH: Chicks don’t dig automatons.]

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:43 pm Troubadour

        Even a humanitiesish dude mating with a mathish chick can lead to the same disaster, genetically. I have a militant rampaging feminist lesbian who cuts her tits with a steak knife, and a spergy son who hasn’t even daydreamed about a real girl yet, and he’s 20.

        Total genetic failure. I’d almost sign on to have more babies, if I can ever find a real female and successfully charm my way into her vajayjay. But probably not, in all honesty. Genetics, schmetics, kids are EXPENSIVE, and I paid those dues once already.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:51 pm Zombie Shane

        > ” a militant rampaging feminist lesbian who cuts her tits with a steak knife”

        Okay, POIDH.

        http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=poidh

        LOL’ed.

        PS: Did you record “The Wreck of the Beta Male Cuckold”?

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 3:15 am Troubadour

        Honestly, I never saw the evidence with my own eyes. Something went wrong with the printer one morning, and I had to get involved to figure out how to print a school paper. I read it. It was all about how she cuts her tits with a steak knife and tries to kill herself all the time.

        Maybe it’s bullshit, maybe it isn’t bullshit. I didn’t ask to examine her tits, I just started paying bills out the ass for therapy and shrinks.

        I started working on the song, and then I got sidetracked seven ways from Sunday and never got back to it. The mood has passed.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:10 pm Matthew

        Think dispersed society. Brights aren’t supposed to breed too much with other brights. This is yet another case of cities being bad for humans.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 12:48 pm irishsavant

        In support of your contention, Jews have very high rates of autism and Aspergers.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 12:58 pm Greg Eliot

        Which explains the lion’s share of modern TV network programming.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 1:50 pm corvinus

        lol

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:01 pm irishsavant

        Touche!

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 5:37 pm Theodore Logan

        and Taysacs disease, amongst all their other inbred problems like their rat faced noses and droopy ears.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 8:25 pm whiskeysplace

        Taysachs is like Sickle Cell Anemia in Blacks. One copy of the gene has greatly enhanced malaria resistance, two copies a horrible fatal disease. Malaria resistance is so evolutionary powerful that the mutation has persisted in both Blacks and Jews; different responses to endemic malaria.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 6:35 pm thwack

        whiskeysplace

        Taysachs is like Sickle Cell Anemia in Blacks.
        ————————————————————-

        And Huntingtons-Korea in White people.

        Either way, if you get sick and they name the disease after you, its probably a death sentence.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:43 pm Charles&Friends

        ADHD = Absent Dad at Home Disorder

        LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 12:01 pm Anonymous

      Have I not been keeping up with my celebrity news (hopefully) or has Brad and Angelina only adopted a brood of third worlders, never creating their own spawn?

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 5:40 pm Theodore Logan

        they have two of their own.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:26 pm SC

        Three, actually.

        LikeLike


  2. on January 28, 2014 at 11:11 am Gert Frobe Stunt Double

    Charles Murray wept tears of joy as an eagle soared overhead.

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 9:12 pm Matthew

      Eagle overhead.
      Charles Murray wept tears of joy.
      Ta-Nehisi Coates.

      LikeLike


    • on January 30, 2014 at 10:42 am Matthew King

      An end to late-in-life spergs borne of the desiccated wombs of overeducated cougars.

      That’s a problem that solves itself.

      CH, you fail to mention how Fishtown is supposed to behave in the meantime. Gleaning this website, one might think that the current boundary-free, celebrity-imitating fuckall among the underclass will have no effect on the dynamic. You have instructions to break the SWPL cartel at the top, but no solution for the bottom, which is the other end of this two-front invasion.

      So Belmont disasssortively mates its way out of its armageddon, how do the lower classes get free of the ghetto behavior you promote? What happens to lower-class men? You’ve spent half-a-decade telling them: Don’t get married, Don’thave kids, Don’t curtail your libido, Do bang as many bitches as physically possible.

      In other words, you have half-a-solution. And for the ones who really need to get their shit together, lower class whites, you promote the very same Jewy antisocial propaganda The Cathedral does.

      Your apotheosizing of hedonism among the most vulnerable cultural classes makes you the equivalent of a porn peddler. A sophisticated Al Goldstein who traffics in words and promises to omegas, rather than photographs of the unattainable. Consider how much you inadvertently contribute to the very cultural problems about which you are greatly exercised.

      Matt

      LikeLike


  3. on January 28, 2014 at 11:17 am Gert Frobe Stunt Double

    Oh, and it’s not relatively dysgenic because our current system ties up all the smart men with smart women who wait forever to breed and reduce the average total fertility of both partners. Better the smart men have many more children (with younger sperm, yes this matters too) and the smart girls get… whatever smart girls get.

    [CH: The sperm of older men has likely contributed to evolved human longevity. So BoSSS is win-win!]

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 12:38 pm Scray

      I just think every man should have kids with multiple women. Solves the problem. I mean, you want some tactics — here….when a man is young, he can knock a slightly older woman up (capitalizing on the fact that his SMV is lower but still rising and hers is probably still higher but falling)…when he nears thirty, he can tradeoff and knock someone around his own age up….and then when he’s in his mid-late 30’s — when his physical powers start to wane but his financial powers are nearing their peak— he can lock down the hottest, youngest (but PROBABLY least “love”-iest) woman and have his last batch.

      Boom.

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 12:48 pm Maya

        No. The best option is to fall in love with a smart, pretty, young and feminine girl and have 5 kids with her.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 1:20 pm Scray

        That option is accounted for in my multiple-woman plan. She’d be the last woman. Guy snags her when guy is 35-40.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 8:52 am Maya

        This is disgusting … because the kids he has with the first two women are then raised without a father and this is really sad and disgusting.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 11:31 am Matthew King

        It’s high-minded niggerism. You are absolutely correct. Spraying your seed like Philander Rodman doesn’t give you a legacy of men like, say, the Romney clan. If you fire and forget (and flee), you leave your sons to be formed by single moms who are proven whores and/or the welfare state.

        There is a difference between savage and alpha. The inchoate strengths of both are only manifested effectively in the latter, whereas the animal is in constant war with itself until it destroys itself, knowing only how to direct its power inward rather than outward.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 12:18 pm Scray

        What? He’ll be around.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:09 pm OralCummings

        The actor Chris O’Donnell seems to have done that. He was a poon-magnet who got married and is busy raising a bunch of kids,as seen on Kimmel last PM. He mentioned that his TV co-star,rapper LL Cool J,also has a bunch of kids,but LL has much more free time,as his kids are older. LOL. He forgot to add,LL is black.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:14 pm Matthew

        “I just think every man should have kids with multiple women.”

        The problem with this plan is restraining the impulse to crap on their tits or laugh at their miscarriages.

        LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 12:45 pm irishsavant

      “Many sweet, charming “lower class” women are sharp as tacks, despite their mortal sin of having not willingly endured 52 years of academic mind meld to the equalist borg.”

      Those words of wisdom should be emblazoned on the doors of every institution in the land. My experience of academe tells me that the presence of most of the women is accounted for by circumstances rather than brains. By way of contrast, as you say, so many left-school-early women are smart cookies and very practical.

      And duly appreciative of a man’s superior intellect!

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:24 pm Gert Frobe Stunt Double

        Higher IQ women stay in school longer on average. That’s a fact. But there are certainly a lot of decently intelligent but uncredentialed working class beauties. An endless sea of undervalued talent far greater than red pill men could ever make use of.

        Also, to the sperm age deniers (I was among you a year ago), Greg Cochran of 10,000 Year Explosion fame discusses it numerous times on his blog West Hunter
        http://westhunt.wordpress.com/?s=paternal+age

        [CH: No one’s denying that sperm, like any other body part, ages. We’re only emphasizing the very important and very true point that womb aging is far more deleterious to healthy procreation than is sperm aging. And that in fact old sperm, unlike old wombs, pass along some advantageous side effects, like increased human lifespan. Nothing to sneeze at, I’d say.]

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:46 pm Hugh Mann

        From Robert Graves’ “I, Claudius” – the Emperor is rebuked in court :

        On one occasion – the counsel for the defence explained that his client, a man of sixty-five, had recently married. His wife was a witness in the case, and was quite a young woman. I remarked that the marriage was illegal. According to the Poppaean-Papian Law (with which I happened to be familiar) a man over sixty was not allowed to marry a woman under fifty: the legal assumption was that a man over sixty is unfit for parentage. I quoted the Greek epigram

        The old man weds, for Nature’s rule he scorns
        – “Father a weakly stock, or else wear horns”.

        The lawyer considered for a few moments and then extemporized.

        “And that old man, yourself, is a plain fool
        To foist on Nature this unnatural rule.
        A sturdy old man fathers sturdy sons;
        A weakly young man fathers weakly ones. ”

        This was so just a point and so neatly made that I forgave the poet-lawyer.

        [CH: Yup. File under: Proven entity.]

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 4:28 am Flip

        It looks like Ronan Farrow was fathered by Frank Sinatra who was 72 when he was born, and he graduated from Yale Law School so it doesn’t look like old sperm did him any harm.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 7:14 am irishsavant

        Well I think the lovely but deranged Mia has no idea who is father is.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 10:59 am Amy

        Lol. She is indeed deranged and was, shall we say, rather indiscriminate in her sex life.

        But I saw a picture of Ronan Farrow recently in a magazine, and he is a dead ringer for Sinatra. Which is good, because I’m sure Mia had to wait for the kid to grow up to get a clue who the father was. “Ronan honey, looks like your dad was Frank Sinatra. Sorry for the confusion!”

        LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 2:07 pm OralCummings

      Jokes on yo ! Sperm is made daily so its always brand new,aint no such thing as old sperm. Now,old BALLS….well thats a thing,LOL!

      LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 1:13 am Heywood Jablome

        “Old sperm” as in “sperm from a man who’s never had a genetic disease kill him in his youth.” Get it now?

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 5:19 am thwack

        Check out the big brain on Hay Jay!

        LikeLike


  4. on January 28, 2014 at 11:19 am corvinus

    PS: There are plenty of reasons why CH rails against the obesity epidemic so passionately, but one is that it’s easier for high status men to date “occupationally lower” women if those women still have their exquisite figures.

    Or, if the supply of non-fat chicks is too low, you could just say heck with it and go Eastern European.

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 11:36 am The Burninator

      Yes. Or, we can start an open movement of fat shaming that doesn’t bow to the howls of femi-nazis and white knights, and spread the word.

      In fact the reintroduction of shame. modesty and humility would go a long way towards curing a large amount of female idiocy these days.

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 12:29 pm corvinus

        Yeah, a continuous #fatshamingweek is helpful too.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:16 pm Matthew

        Kidnapping and a regimen of clown-rape will take off those pounds like nobody’s business.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 12:38 pm The Burninator

        One part about my life I do not regret and look back on fondly is coming of girl banging age during the 1980’s, when fat shaming was strong, open and celebrated (“No fat chicks!” flags on pickup trucks, at party poolsides, etc) and women were still by and large (no pun intended) in decent shape.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:12 pm OralCummings

        Remember Phoebe Cates in Fast Times? Life altering. (NOTE:Sean Penns iconic line,the best in the movie,hell the best he’s ever had,”Those guys are FAGS!” is not allowed when the movie is televised. Funny–we’re going backwards!)

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:16 pm corvinus

        And keep in mind that Sean Penn is a loathsome libtard.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 6:12 pm Anonymous

        I think he is not entirely in command of his senses.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:16 pm Matthew

        And Phoebe Cates is a — married to a –.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 5:58 am Hugh G. Rection

        Unless you get a lot of high profile, high value men on board with that who are also ready to do it in real life, fat (heh) chance that this is gonna bear any fruits.

        LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 4:18 pm FamilyMan

      I like this much better than shaming anyone. That’s beneath me. But we have a right to all the world’s (consenting) women.

      LikeLike


  5. on January 28, 2014 at 11:25 am Preston

    “[CH: The sperm of older men has likely contributed to evolved human longevity. So BoSSS is win-win!]”

    I call bullshit.

    [CH: Re-raised.]

    The sperm of older men tends to be littered with micromutations found in less frequency than their younger counterparts.

    This disparity in mutagenesis is amplified in older and younger women.

    Moral of the story? Better to be an older man with a younger woman than vice versa.

    LikeLike


  6. on January 28, 2014 at 11:30 am The Burninator

    “It’s time to return to the old, true ways. To a courtship arena that paired established men with pretty young assistants full of adoration and admiration. It is the natural order of things, the divine prescription, when the starry-eyed lovely, already gazing in welcome submission, completes the act of her surrender to the powerful man above her.”

    Agree. Question of practical concern though. Men are largely being pushed out of the “established” zone by dint of feminist law and corporate policies in nearly all industries these days, or they are “going their own way” and are never to be seen again (the poor sexless slags). In a nearly transformed feminist society how precisely do we get to the “established young man”, the likes of which is the pedestal upon which the future will and must be built? How does a man establish and become responsible and successful if all he hears from the Femicunts is “Surrender!” and almost all he’s getting from the nascent manosphere is “Hedonism! Burn it down!”.

    Serious question. I agree 100% with the solution and the idea of grabbing up the young, hot secretary with the gentle disposition instead of the reprehensible grotesque “cougars” or the, as you call them (correctly) femicunt lawyers (or business broads in general).

    As an aside, I’ve noticed that nearly all of my comments now are pre-moderated. As I cannot recall saying anything arbitrary or particularly controversial as of late, this comes as a surprise. Am I that much of a threat?

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 2:12 pm irishsavant

      Men, White men, to be more specific, have created everything of value in the world today, including everything that enables the worthless existence of contemptuous feminists. The program to marginalise and breed White men out of existence will have severe consequences. End of bridges that don’t fall down and botox that doesn’t fall out.

      I await with eager anticipation.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:42 pm whiskeysplace

        This +10000

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:49 pm Hilary Clinton

        Ja naturlich.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:05 pm FamilyMan

        We now import our bridges from China.

        http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/business/global/26bridge.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 6:35 am The Burninator

        @irishsavant

        ” End of bridges that don’t fall down and botox that doesn’t fall out.

        I await with eager anticipation.”

        Ah, but you see my Gaelic brother, this is exactly what I’m talking about. What you anticipate with eagerness is precisely the opposite of what will make CH’s “I Have A Secretary!” speech happen in real life. If we crave implosion and rest our laurels on hedonism with our finger in the air, especially now when we still have a huge well of untapped strength and potential and, frankly, power, then we will have a lot of blame to absorb for the “fall” should it occur. And as you point out and I agree, it will occur if current trends continue, for exactly the reasons you mention.

        All it takes to slap these bitches down, is to slap them down. Just like in real life, the moment a man shows real strength and resolve in front of a shit testing woman she backs down and is even pleased that she had to back down, so thus it may well be at a societal level as well. Feminism is a shit test. Going beta and retreating to our corner with a finger in the air wouldn’t pass a shit test in real life, nor does it here at a cultural level as well.

        We need to build men. Strong men. Men who explore without fear, fight with zeal and gusto, who harness the power of the cosmos in the solar system while slaying pussy at home. Men who can say a bold “Yes” to manliness and a firm “No!” to emasculation and feminism. That’s how we stop this entire bullshit emo depression “We can’t win, might as well eat some grapes, screw some bar bints and wait for the fall” in its tracks, and it’s how we destroy feminism and put women back in their rightful places.

        CH’s article actually touches on this to a degree. Men with prospects and with accomplishment do not rise in today’s society like they used to due to both legal and cultural feminism. We need to create a society in which they will once again. This will not happen by sitting by the poolside and cheering nihilism and deconstruction. We have to rise and stand as men again, and do so proudly and fearlessly. We need to disobey the “laws” that castrate us, firmly and without flinching. We need to start defying and destroying family courts and convincing other men to join us. We need to start thumbing our nose at “equal opportunity” bullshit laws, and make a movement out of it. Teach men to fight instead of recoil, to stand instead of recline in the hammock. The bitches will back down when confronted with strength. Nothing else will suffice.

        Slainte mhor agud! (sp?)

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 7:36 am irishsavant

        Go raibh maith agut burnirator. What you say is true as far as it goes and our task would be relatively clear-cut and easy were our foes merely the feminist shrikes and their SWPL deluded sisters you refer to. But the agenda against the White male is a far more profound affair than that. Going no further back that the Frankfurt School we can see that all of our society has been poisoned and debased by their seditious teachings.

        And sadly, we have succumbed to the Classical Chinese theory of warfare which holds that the perfect strategy is getting your enemy to commit suicide voluntarily. Nothing exemplifies this more than the swamping of White countries – and only White countries – with hordes of Third (Turd?) world enrichers. Hence my schadenfreude……..given that our demise is inevitable maybe like Samson I can take some satisfaction in our destroyers suffering as well.

        Future generations will ask, like the traveller contemplating Ozymandias, ‘What powerful but unrecorded race, Once dwelt in that annihilated place.’

        LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 7:03 pm little spoon

      “nd the idea of grabbing up the young, hot secretary with the gentle disposition instead of the reprehensible grotesque “cougars” or the, as you call them (correctly) femicunt lawyers (or business broads in general)”

      Where do you live where this “young hot secretary” fantasy exists? I haven’t seen a young hot secretary in any office since….well…the last time I was a secretary.

      [CH: You obviously don’t mix with the right people.]

      Every secretary I’ve seen in the last 7 years has been some overweight matronly type. I see zero hot admin assistant girls unless they are part time students. All the pretty girls I see work in marketing and PR, where their bosses are mostly female.

      [There’s always a man at the top.]

      Higher IQ will tend to come with greater attractiveness up till a point. Greater dilligence, which correlates with a non administrative career, will also correlate with attractiveness. Pretty girls will tend to have a career of some sort and a college degree or two. Secretaries are usually matronly hispanic women in my world.

      [Your world sounds depressing.]

      I hate this post. It’s so stupid.

      [Women offended by this post: Fugs with a slew of academic cred.]

      Now me, I am more likely to produce a child in the smart fraction than a college drop out receptionist.

      [Men don’t give a flying fuck about that beyond dry arid mental recitations of social class concordance. What matters is how stiff they get looking at you.]

      And me, I like my boss. A lot. Therefore, this post is bad.

      [But does your boss like you? That’s the relevant question. ps If you’re over 30, it won’t matter how much smarts your kid will have passed onto it… you won’t have a kid to worry about that. So get cracking on that. You are woman, see the Wall rise.]

      LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 5:34 am little spoon

        “[Men don’t give a flying fuck about that beyond dry arid mental recitations of social class concordance.”

        I also wouldn’t care if my kid was smart,

        [CH: Do you always contradict yourself within the span of a paragraph?]

        but more smart people is better for civilization at this point because we seek scientific progress and only a small subset of the population can aid that kind of innovation.

        [Growing inequality caused by assortative mating is bad for civilization. Your move.]

        “[But does your boss like you? That’s the relevant question.”

        My boss has two small children. His boss also has two small children. This is sad for me because I have no boss who I would feel comfortable having an affair with even though I am very drawn to whoever my male boss is simply because he is my boss as long as he is passably attractive. None of my bosses are old enough. I need one that is like 50 with grown children.

        [Thanks for the psychological self-assessment.]

        [Women offended by this post: Fugs with a slew of academic cred.]

        Hopefully I am not fug, but I have multiple ivy league degrees.

        [Explains a lot.]

        This post seems to deliberately and needlessly exclude women like me and I don’t understand why.

        [This post is a truth bomb. All truth bombs by their very nature exlude this or that class of people who are wounded by them.]

        I make 6 figures doing a front desk job,

        [#GoodbyeAmerica]

        but I like and admire my boss at least as much as a secretary would. Why are you saying that male bosses should pair with their less intelligent secretary underlings rather than their similarly intelligent apprentice underlings?

        [Intelligence has got little to do with it.]

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 3:18 pm Canadian Friend

        Woah just a minute!

        A few months ago you said you could not leave your old ugly musician boyfriend because you had no money and could not afford to live on your own

        now you are saying you pull a 6 figure income???

        wtf???

        [CH: Nice catch. This bitch is a pathological liar.]

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 4:55 pm little spoon

        Cf, I got a new job. So I don’t post on ch during the day like i used to. I have much work to do. Miss you all, specially ch.

        LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2014 at 7:00 am Lash

        Nice catch indeed CF.

        Remember something when you read Feministx’s babbly pronouncements about other women’s disqualifications. Feministx is South Indian.

        LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2014 at 8:15 pm FamilyMan

        Six figures for working at the front desk? As, like, a receptionist?

        Even in NYC the pay isn’t like that.

        LikeLike


      • on January 31, 2014 at 10:11 pm little spoon

        lol, no. As in front office- decision making type job.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 6:52 am The Burninator

        CH basically answered the same way I would have. You live in a self contained world little spoon, one of solipsism and narcissism (“If I don’t see it, it doesn’t exist, it must be a fantasy!”).

        If I’m not mistaken (I may be) you are a city broad, right? Here in flyover country we still have pretty secretaries and a pool of manly men to work with, unlike say, NYC.

        As to your contempt for non-“educated” women, it’s par for the course. If one doesn’t embrace Grrrrl Powerrrrr, then one must be mocked, ridiculed and shamed. We get it. You’re saying nothing new under the sun and your flailing and condemning are rather boring.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 7:05 am little spoon

        A lot of my friends are uneducated because they are singers or dancers but those are careers.

        [CH: Another #coolstorybroad]

        Then I know a couple of girls who are aspiring novelists who work administration part time but they have degrees.

        [There are degrees, and there are “degrees”.]

        My experience is that girls here who lack both career aspirations and education are absolutely dull or just messed up somehow.

        [My experience is that girls who have more than a college education are fucked up head cases without a trace of femininity.]

        This isn’t the case in countries wheres only a small percentage of people get degrees. But in the us like 45% of young women have degrees. If you are not one of them and you are not a talented creative type then I think you are probably rather lame.

        [I know three women off the top of my head who never went past high school who are less lame than you.]

        LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2014 at 8:01 pm FamilyMan

        I’ll agree with LS, even if she doesn’t.

        I want my kids to be smart. Intelligence does depend heavily on the mother’s genes. For a fling, it doesn’t matter because there are to be no kids. But for a wife it matters.

        I am from the NYC area and have an idea what LS is talking about regarding secretaries. In the major investment banks, secretaries are typically black females. That way they tick two boxes on their diversity requirements all the while keeping decision making professional and managerial roles for those who can be trusted with decisions, those who can compete in the market and not get slaughtered. The professional jobs are almost entirely filled by whites and asians, and upper management is heavily male.

        I think that these institutions, due to their influence, are able to strike this bargain and avoid further scrutiny of their diversity programs. Not sure most businesses could get away with this optimization.

        LikeLike


  7. on January 28, 2014 at 11:41 am Grim

    Prior to there being a CH or me discovering red pill, I was wiser than I knew. But then I gave in to society-wide feminist indoctrination and that’s why I’m now divorced. I married a South American woman when she was 25 years old. She was/is the opposite of a lawyer femcunt–not much education, but exactly as CH describes: very smart, but feminine and traditional. She gave me two great healthy kids when she was 28 and 30. So that was a win for me. It’s not that I’m a loser, it’s that everything CH writes here is true, so to find a woman willing to get married at such a young age, one must find a foreigner, as the white womenz think their purpose is the cock carousel until age 34 or 37.

    During my marriage, I was looked down on by my friends. “Why did you marry that (uneducated) woman?” That kind of thing. As I was blue pill and stupid, I always felt ashamed like I was supposed to have married a lawyer. (I’m a lawyer.) When in actuality I was lucky to have a great stay-at-home traditional mom for a wife, who also got her body back immediately and looked great after the kids, as the hispanic women with thin arms are able to do. (Look at the arms–that’s the tell of whether she’ll bloat up later.)

    Had I known the teachings of CH then, I’d still be happily married right now. I basically didn’t treat her right because I always sort of felt like I should not have married her in the first place.

    My friends and society were wrong, and my ex wife and I were right, when we got married and had kids at a young age.

    Point being, CH’s post is on point, as usual.

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 12:01 pm Scray

      It’s the natural order of things just based on common sense. Your status only matters if she doesn’t have the same status. If you’re a lawyer and you’re gunning for lawyercunts….lol, way to devalue your entire career. If you’re a lawyer and you shoot for a nurse, secretary, etc….hey, suddenly you can make it work for you.

      And so on, and so on, and so on with every trait.
      Go where you’re needed and appreciated.

      [CH: Maximize your strengths, minimize your weaknesses. Or, as a great icon of the silver screen once said, “A man’s gotta know his limitations.”]

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:54 pm Grim

        Scray, here we are agreeing, but you’re not getting part of it: yes, duh, but you are very lucky to be 19 years old (in some respects, in other respects not so much) in 2014. When I was your age, there was no CH, no “red pill” blogs or manosphere, etc. to support what smart men know is “the natural order of things just based on common sense.”

        Now I’m no sheep, I was not in a fraternity because I didn’t want to be forced to drink until I vomit, etc. I do my own thing. But what I’m telling you is that literally 10 years ago there was no CH and nothing to combat the fact that EVERYONE was blue pill.

        I’m a lawyer. I run in circles of lawyers. As we discuss here, many professionals and business leaders are blue pill/beta when it comes to women. But get this: what I’m telling you is that until the manosphere arrived quite recently WE WERE BLUE PILL ON PURPOSE.

        As proof I will tell you that in my generation (I’m 38) and younger, a good 30% of all male lawyers marry female lawyers, in purpose, and it’s a blue pill attitude that this “status” is what they should do. In fact, it’s the more “naturals” (naturals with women even if they don’t understand their own actions) who got the hot (for a lawyer) female lawyers and ended up marrying other lawyers and becoming a “power couple.”

        When I married a stay-at-home-mom type, against the grain, my friends and peers and blue pill society, 11 years ago, told me I was wrong. There was no red pill or CH blogs to support my “common sense” even though I was right.

        Yeah call me a pussy, but shit is real, when you are married to such a person, and your lawyer friends all literally give you a hard time. Society is blue pill, including such things as parties at fancy law firms like where I work. As sad as it is, very few people, percentagewise, in the entire world, have the knowledge we here at CH have.

        In short, I “went where I was needed and appreciated” and my friends and society, which is blue pill, put negative pressures on my marriage.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:39 pm Scray

        I’m in my 20’s tho lol.

        Ya the problem is you couldn’t translate blue-pill speak. For example, people dog George Clooney all the time about dating women half his age. George Clooney — and we red pillers — know that this is tight. All it is is an affirmation of GC’s tightness.

        A real power couple is complementary.

        Now, of course the naturals got the ‘hot’ female lawyers. Because everyone’s a lawyer, the status thing cancels. What do you have left? Looks and game. Naturally, the spoils in that market will go to those with the best looks and/or game.

        We should have a red pill would you rather….(those could be funny blog posts)
        for example:

        ….LTR a single mom 8 with two kids who has a decent-paying job that would pay for precisely 1.5 of those kids if you were together

        or
        …
        an unattached, 23 year old 6 who has all signs of becoming a fat whale in five years.

        YOU MUST LTR ONE FOR AT LEAST 10 YEARS.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:13 pm FamilyMan

        There is always the third option: neither of the above and continue taking my chances in the market. Otherwise it’s a completely wrongheaded test.

        Status doesn’t completely cancel out within a social circle. It puts you in the circle, and among some circles, that’s considered a good thing. Maybe, due to groupthink, better than it actually is. “We’re smart, hardworking lawyers, not just bums like …”

        I had to figure this stuff out 20 years ago. To me it comes from first principles. My first principle is that I’m a leg man. All the noise from society was unable to shake me from this profound self-knowledge.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:18 pm Scray

        There is always the third option: neither of the above and continue taking my chances in the market.

        there is no third option. That’s the whole point of “Would You Rather…” That’s what makes it fun, brah.

        —

        Status does cancel within a social circle. If you all share X trait in common, and that trait is the basis for your belonging to the group, having X trait is no longer special. Accordingly, you can no longer derive any additional status (beyond belonging) from that trait.

        Now you have to examine other traits beyond X to determine the relative status within the social group.

        C’mon people….think it through, think it out.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 10:15 pm FamilyMan

        Scray, sometimes people think they’re pretty hot shit. There are some groups where everyone is interesting. There’s a famous / infamous letter from a mother of a female Princeton student, telling her to date the guys there because Princeton men are high quality.

        http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/01/princeton-mom-letter-to-female-students/2041903/

        BTW this letter drove the feminists into rages.

        Not saying “lawyers” is such a group, seems too inclusive. But I am not one so I shouldn’t say.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:54 pm Troubadour

        The peer and status thing is still true in 2014. I have a buddy who divorced his bitchy American wife and married an 18 year old virgin from the Philippines. He’s one happy dude, but everybody in his life gives him never-ending shit about his uneducated “mail order bride.” Including me, truthfully enough. I think there is a lot more of a cash transaction to this thing than some pretty young girl falling madly in love with a 300 pound fat guy who looks like an alibino Shrek. If I lived on $50 a year and I had six daughters…..

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 6:22 pm Anonymous

        If you want to have a lot of sex with your wife, it’s better she not work. All of these power couples are too busy and tired to fuck.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 7:17 pm Gr8YT

        Yes, that’s fine for people but what about lawyers?

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:19 pm Matthew

        Nooses.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 10:18 pm FamilyMan

        Lawyer=lawyer marriages have a divorce rate something like 70% if I recall right. It’s very high. These are weird nasty people, the love is driven out of you in law school. Saw it happen to a friend of mine, it turned him into an asshole I could no longer talk to.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 7:04 am Hugh G. Rection

        Yeah, and that doesn’t even factor in forming a family. How many are really willing to give up two high incomes and the lifestyle that comes with it?

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 8:43 am Amy

        And often two mountains of educational debt, which will keep each of them working whether they want it or not.

        LikeLike


  8. on January 28, 2014 at 11:52 am UnequalMensch

    I am handsome and muscular, and yet, I am unequal. I am intelligent and multilingual, and yet, I am unequal. Many of you are better than me, most are surely richer than me, and that is OK.

    Say it with me, say it loud, I’M UN-EQUAL AND I’M PROUD!!!!

    Good day Mr. Heartiste.

    [CH: Godspeed, soldier of modesty.]

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 12:51 pm Greg Eliot

      Nicole and/or thwack due along to tell you how you shouldn’t be proud, because the nonachievements of other unequals are not your own nonachievements in 3…. 2…. 1….

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:16 pm irishsavant

        Greg, I’m fairly new to this site so maybe I’m missing something. But why does thwack attract such abuse? He doesn’t seem your standard objectionable negro from what I can see. .

        [CH: thwack trolls a lot, and of course there will be those who chomp on the stinky bait.]

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:30 pm OralCummings

        thwack isnt disliked by most posters;in fact there is a sort of old fashioned rub-a-negro’s-head-for-good-luck kind of affection for him. he is clever. But he does troll.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 7:25 pm Canadian Friend

        For what it is worth,

        Thwack seems to have at least 3 personalities,

        one day he admits there are dysfunctions in the black community caused by blacks themselves,

        the next day he accuses us of being white supremacists responsible for the problems of blacks

        and then the next day he makes jokes and avoids racial matters.

        The one I am puzzled about here is Whiskyplace…I have no idea why some are so angry at him…

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:22 pm Matthew

        Whiskey is at the very least a raging philosemite, but more likely an actual Jew. A Cohan with a Plan. He has the very obvious and very tired goal of convincing us that all white women want big black cock because white men are just pathetic losers.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:24 pm Matthew

        If you need a reason to doubt his sincerity, note that he says ridiculous shit like “Jews are about 2% of voters in the 2008 election according to Fox. Jewish “control” is laughable….”

        http://eumaios.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/whiskey-is-up-to-no-good/

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 11:08 pm Mob Barley

        wow the red-pill gossip mags are tight!

        LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2014 at 6:44 am thwack

        Canadian Friend

        The one I am puzzled about here is Whiskyplace…I have no idea why some are so angry at him
        ————————————————————————————————-

        I had that problem too CF, but if you pay attention to his “style” you will see how he cloaks himself in white nationalist garb in order to pollute and confuse the white nationalist agenda.

        Its a pretty slick technique, but he’s been blown out cause Chateau white nationalists tend to be a more elite self selected group.

        I suggest you analyze his comments this way. Look at where he starts, and then compare it to where he ends up?

        Its often two different places and this is contrary to the most basic rule of political commentary.

        Where you stop should support and reinforce where you started; NOT contradict it.

        Finally, many times his comments are nothing more than a vehicle for him to talk about his favorite subject which is big black cocks.

        LikeLike


      • on February 1, 2014 at 6:48 pm Matthew

        Stated better than I could. Well done.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 11:20 am Matthew King

        He not a hater / He just trolls a lot

        — Joseph Antonio Cartagena

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 12:02 pm Jay in DC

        You were close… though I’m guessing very few people here will get it. Try– Christopher Lee Rios, may he RIP. Though they did do some collaborations for obvious reasons. Either way, hat tip for the subtlety.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 1:35 pm thwack

        irishsavant

        Greg, I’m fairly new to this site so maybe I’m missing something. But why does thwack attract such abuse?
        ———————————————————————————————–

        Its because Im black and black people are cursed; its in the bible.

        I ain’t mad atcha.

        LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 1:54 pm corvinus

      It’s easier to equalize everyone by making them all dumb, as opposed to making them all smart (which would require the right genetic material).

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:56 pm thwack

        Im biracial, my mom is an orangatang and my dad is a gorilla.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:39 pm driveallnight

        I don’t usually stoop to talking about someone’s mom, but you misspelled her name.

        Now, if it had been your father’s name that was unfamiliar to you…..

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 10:23 pm FamilyMan

        sorry thwack, I almost sprayed coffee on my monitor there.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 11:59 pm driveallnight

        Back stateside again for a few months. Still in the bullpen getting warmed up.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 4:21 am thwack

        You are forgiven; no honest white man can resist a negro spelling error. Its like finger nails on a chalk board.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 10:57 am Matthew King

        Which is why you deliberately retain those errors. They are a provocation.

        But it can’t end well. You can’t celebrate dysfunction and imprecision as a marker of your race and expect to gain the respect or the equality of white men. Do as the Jews do: tighten up all of these unforced errors, educate yourself in the little details, and present your case as unimpeachably as possible. Right now you give us excuses to dismiss you, as if we didn’t have enough already. “If he doesn’t even know the word is orangutan, what other basic stuff is he missing?” (And I just had to look up the spelling myself.)

        Being smart isn’t exclusive to whites, but you are doing your best to make it seem that way. Which is typical of negroes, and your respect here derives from the ways you diverge from typical negrosity.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 11:48 am Grim

        I gave Thwack the benefit of the doubt. I thought he spelled it that way on purpose because that’s how (white trash) people pronounce it. lzozlzozlzozl. It’s a lot of crazy stuff happenin’ up in here!!! zlozlzozzl

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 7:41 am irishsavant

        Well, look on the bright side thwack. Not many of your ethnicity can claim to know their father.

        LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 4:15 pm FamilyMan

      I don’t get it.

      If you’re a guy, why would I care about relative equality? Good luck to you.

      If you’re a girl, why are you boasting about being handsome and muscular?

      LikeLike


  9. on January 28, 2014 at 11:55 am Anton

    Secretary = Bowling alley girl (as I call them).

    Active, sweet, non-intellectual (though smart) and happy-to-be-girls…

    LikeLike


  10. on January 28, 2014 at 11:55 am Reservoir Tip

    Unrelated but a funny read. It’s like an r-selection family reunion!

    http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/demaryius-thomas-mother-grandmother-watch-him-play-super-234900938–nfl.html

    LikeLike


  11. on January 28, 2014 at 11:56 am Maya

    I’m against assortative mating but I’m afraid that the other option is even worse. Older women should probably date men who are much older and sadly it’s very difficult to find a man who is in his forties or fifties and is still physically attractive, fit, someone who wants to get married and have kids. Most older men already have their own kids and probably don’t want to have more. In my opinion BoSSS strategy is most appropriate for girls under 25 because they can still find a man who is in his thirties and without three kids from previous marriage.

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 12:08 pm The Burninator

      But the fit, successful, square jawed man in his 40’s is the one this is directed at, not the flabby, pastel wearing suburban beta schlub who cringes in fear that his wife might find him reading things from the manosphere.

      Young women melt like butter for the former type, but hold, as you do, the later type in contempt, and rightly so. But that doesn’t mean that younger gals should shoot for less. Up your game instead of resigning yourselves to defeat.

      LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 12:11 pm Preston

      Indeed.

      But then again there are many things that an older woman who is single ‘should have.’

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 12:45 pm Maya

        Yes. And when an older woman dates a man who is not much older than her this is usually assortative mating.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 1:34 pm GasButtox

        Maya,

        Detox my Buttox….

        -GB

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:05 pm driveallnight

        Lulz, all we need now is a post from David Alexander or the Glorious Natural Pelt guy and it’ll officially be Reunion Week.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:26 pm Matthew

        What if Peter and David Alexander are the same guy?

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 10:11 pm driveallnight

        Be still, my beating heart!

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 6:25 pm Anonymous

        Maya, you should go back to being a lesbian. You’ll never attract the sort of man you claim to seek.

        LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 12:26 pm everybodyhatesscott

      If you put a few buns in your oven in your 20’s with your husband you can raise them and have a nice child free house by the time your’re 50 and not have to worry about this “dating older men” because you’ll still be with your loving husband who you didn’t frivorce.

      3 kids by 30 and you can stop before you have any retards.

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 12:54 pm Greg Eliot

        Retardation works both ways… many parents get it from their kids.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 1:10 pm unkempt

        gee, that sounds like a good plan, like something somebody would come up with if they understood they’ll be 50 one day. but we’re talking about girls here, and they never get that. though I try. I tell my sister ‘you gotta find some dude who’s gonna take care of you and have a couple kids while youre still young and hot, and make that dude work for it too’. I tell all the other girls ‘youre never gonna meet another man like me, and youre gonna regret not doing it, so lets fuck while were still young and hot’.

        girls just dont respect wisdom anymore.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:02 pm FamilyMan

        And then they don’t realize they have passed the wall, for several years after it has happened. The partners aren’t interested in commitment any more but they don’t realize that.

        Then they can join cougarlife.com .I kid you not, I saw TV ads for it, I think it was during last week’s Australian Open tennis coverage.

        LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 3:09 pm Grim

      I’m ripped, handsome, and want more kids. Are you Hispanic, younger than 28, and do you weigh less than 120 lbs?

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 6:47 pm Amy

        Hey! Grim, you sound like a catch. Too bad we don’t really know each other because there are at least two single girls I know who meet your criteria.

        LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2014 at 10:28 am Grim

        Yes, this is too bad for all of us.

        LikeLike


  12. on January 28, 2014 at 12:13 pm earl

    Why the CH does have a sweet spot for the days of virginal, submissive women who are not educated academically. I’m glad the cold robotic heart does have some life in it. That inspires me with hope.

    In fact in the heart of every man…we all have this.

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 12:53 pm Maya

      ”I’m glad the cold robotic heart does have some life in it.”

      Me too 🙂 I can totally imagine him falling in love with a girl like this and getting married and having kids with her. They will probably make a film about him sometime in the future. This would be the sweetest and most romantic movie ♥

      LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 1:26 pm Scray

      Nay, my brah. Too many men are gunning for women they bring little, if any, value to. If you want a woman with a PhD, make sure that you are a nobel laureate. If you want a woman who is a Doctor, make sure that you are a world-renowned surgeon — and so on, and so on.

      A woman who is hot will be more receptive to your advances if she has lower status and lower extroversion/sociability/whatever-you-want-to-call-it than you do.

      It goes for everything else.
      Gonna gun for that chick who has the high N count? Better be wicked confident in your sexual abilities and — probably — hyper dominant.

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 1:38 pm Scray

        Keep in mind that I’m holding game as equal between the hypothetical men I’m talking about here. This post seems to be more about the effect of status than game.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 1:57 pm darkhorse

        This is too black and white.

        I used to bang a cute little “genius” girl, perfect SATs. This girl was an extreme anomaly. Attractive, socially normal, but like way way way exceptionally bright. She wasn’t going for Fields Medal cock.

        At a minimum she needed someone who could at least hang with her intellectually when we had discussion, but after that minimum was met, it was all bout social ability, physical value and sexual performance. The nerds weren’t doing their job in the latter three departments.

        The point is you have to be able to hang within a woman’s social tribe AND be sexy.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:29 pm Scray

        This is where the ‘it goes for everything else’ comes in to play. I mean, it’s easy to illustrate the concept with shit like career. But your physical attractiveness, extraversion/social ability, etc count as other traits. So ya I agree.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:21 pm Rick250

        Good point. As young women are excelling over men in higher education (except STEM), the alpha of tomorrow had better have his game and the attributes you mentioned up to par to fight off female hypergamy.

        If youre a builder going to your gf’s dinner party (and she is a doctor) you will be shit tested by her piers and it wont be fun…but if you can handle that and be sexy to boot..you are invinsible.

        Probably most doctors of tomorrow will be women imo.
        This is the future the Cathedral is taking us…Sweden and beyond. They will have a weakness tho..and that is the dying off of the baby boomer generation, and its now senior coalition of femcunts, swpl herbs, and opportunistic YKWs.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:44 pm FamilyMan

        Is it your contention that Generations X / Y / Z are lacking in femcunts, swpl herbs, and opportunistic YKWs?

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:10 pm Rick250

        I liken it more to the dark sith lord and mentor.

        The baby boomer women (and boomer men by doing nothing) started the lawyer femcunt feminism we see so prevalent today. By the time Billy Joel came out with this song in 1986, women were in shoulder pads competing for quality office jobs with men.

        And they have had lots of time to establish the Cathedral since then and hone their skills. Their removal/extinction could be a major weakening of its foundation i believe.

        LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2014 at 9:27 pm FamilyMan

        Women were to be feared in my generation. A guy’s word was shit if a woman disagreed with him. Guys were ruined on a woman’s word. (For a long time I avoided the problem as much as possible. Anti-game to the max. Then I got a bit less worried about it, and the social climate also improved somewhat, and I figured out enough game for my purposes.)

        Women surely didn’t have the power to do this. The agenda was imposed from above / outside. I don’t know what guys could have done to fight back, but it’s an interesting question in retrospect.

        I think things have normalized a bit now. Part of it is the internet. Unstoppable communication about these things helps. So I think does the exposure of women’s bodies via easily available video and porn. There was a power of mystery they used to wield that is now completely gone. Men were helped in this by some of the uber-feminists, with things like “The Vagina Monologues” and sure, it’s great that women think it’s powerful to talk about their vaginas (lol) but it’s men who now can shop them in a freer and more informed marketplace.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:25 pm earl

        “Gonna gun for that chick who has the high N count?”

        She brings little if any value to that relationship. That’s why criminals and sociopaths are the only guys she gets.

        You are the woman you attract.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 4:40 pm Scray

        How so?
        If a woman’s value rests chiefly in her looks and femininity….a woman who has had a high amount of sexual partners maybe takes some sort of ding to her femininity, but why any more so than a woman who has other masculine traits?

        The “less marriage satisfaction/more partners” split could be easily explained by the fact that whoever Ms. High N marries will probably be insufficiently alpha.

        None of this shit matters if you truly, in your core, believe you are tight in all ways.

        A woman’s virginity won’t save you from her eventually wondering or getting curious. But, being alpha won’t either. Your only real defense is to let go of all fear and know that you are tight.

        If you reach for that sort of inner affirmation….you really will open up a lot of experiences for yourself and enable yourself to truly enjoy life.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 6:18 am earl

        Do you always have long winded explanations to my simple truths?

        You are the woman you attract. Sociopaths attract women that are sociopaths. Beta men with a weak heart attract women whose heart is dead. Men with rich treasure attract the best women.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 11:54 am Scray

        Your truth is untrue…it’s karma — nonsense — in playa form.

        No, sociopaths attract good girls all the time. Betas with weak hearts attract women with strong passionate hearts (which then lead them to cheat on the beta with alphas, etc.) Men with rich treasure attract gold-digging psychopaths all the time.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 3:04 pm J.M.

        Mental masturbation and female debate tactics in one post.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 3:06 pm Scray

        and #1-fandom in another!

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:28 pm Matthew

        “I am Amy’s guilty vagina”.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 6:19 am earl

        And the top lips do the flapping for the guilt of the bottom lips.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 11:02 am Amy

        What did I do?

        LikeLike


  13. on January 28, 2014 at 12:17 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

    Agreed, that the reproduction market is fucked up, but institution is the problem not the solution. We don’t exactly have a problem of assortative mating by IQ: we have institutionally guided mating by subsidy and penalty. High IQ women are not worth more by being dumb: they are worth more by being held accountable, whether they marry in their primes or do not. If we only let the cougars and the welfare queens live and die on their own merits and remove support of wives to renege on husband by discontinuing beta transfers forced by gubberment institution, these problems go away. Female survival instincts have been resting, and female reproductive instincts have had far too much latitude. Let high IQ men and women fill the void left by others. As an HBD proponent, you’re support of breaking assortative mating does not seem consistent to me. I think you are getting am something profound; however, correlation with income inequality is not causality. The bankster tax farm system is the causality. All roads lead to Washington, seat of the US Gub and the IMF Gub.

    LikeLike


  14. on January 28, 2014 at 12:25 pm Rosalie

    I completely agree with the overall message of your post. In the history of the West, it was pretty much the rule that exceptionally powerful, intelligent or wealthy men married or had children with younger, beautiful women from lower social classes – the secretary, the chambermaid, the cleaning lady, the maid, the cook. Even geniuses like Descartes, Goethe or Dostoevsky fell for such marital/ amorous arrangements and chose their maids/ secretaries instead of the more intelligent women they had conversations or correspondence with.

    The problem is (at least from what I can see around me or in the media ) that SWPL men are status-whores as much as their female counterparts. A lawyerdick will almost always choose for marriage or children a lawyercunt from the same social circle, even if he has all the options in the world, to keep his high status in the eyes of his lawyer peers. The same can be said about politicians, bankers, professors (or any notable achievers in the academia),or other members of the “elite” of the West. The counter-examples are rare and in the outliers category. Liberal men choose women with liberal credentials to show to the world (sometimes in spite of their hidden affairs).

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 1:37 pm guerrer0

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:45 pm Grim

        I gave a book report on this movie last week. Pure Disjewney feminist indoctrination for the young girls. The lessons: Any man who professes to love you in a beta/romantic way turns out to be evil (the evil “niceguy”). Go, instead, for the jobless rough-around-the-edges “alpha” guy who will stay on your couch and expect you to pay for HIM (he rides around on a motorcycle/pet reindeer). Marriage in general is “bad” and something to be laughed at by any modern female. Any guy to proposes to marry you/offers “commitment” too early in a romantic/beta way turns out to be evil. The only true love comes from your sister and can never be from “some man.”

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 9:23 pm guerrer0

        Sorry for late reply, today i was longer in college than usual because our classroom was planning a trip to Mazatlan, Mexico, but i wasn’t sure because in my agenda i already had plans to go to Hawaii with friends from Spain, anyways, maybe you are right and that film had subliminal messages, but probably the nice guy turning bad could have been a plot twist to dissuade from the obvious and be a surprise, that was my humble opinion.

        LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 6:53 pm Samson J.

      The problem is (at least from what I can see around me or in the media ) that SWPL men are status-whores as much as their female counterparts.

      When I used to host a blog, I had an entry (one of my better ones) on this topic, the topic of “Why on earth do career men marry career women?”, and particularly why male doctors marry other doctors, since that’s the world I know, where I would estimate that at least 50% of male and female doctors of my generation marry each other. I concluded that the chief reason is simply: you tend to marry who you meet.

      But besides that, you are quite right: SWPL men today are as interested in status as women supposedly are. It’s part of the “men have been taught to be women” paradigm – these men have been taught, against all instinct, that their spouse’s career status “matters”, and that it’s uncouth to marry “below” one’s peer group, and they believe it (or think they do) – because they don’t know anything else. They haven’t been told that there could be anything else.

      LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 5:30 am SFG

        That definitely is one reason. But don’t forget the effects of alimony–a wife with a career has a much weaker case for alimony in a divorce, depending on the state.

        Of course, she can also hire a better lawyer.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on January 28, 2014 at 7:13 pm little spoon

      “The problem is (at least from what I can see around me or in the media ) that SWPL men are status-whores as much as their female counterparts.”

      They really are. I work for an investment bank with some dudes that want nothing more than money and status. A couple of weeks ago I went out to lunch with some young single guys and they were talking about how they wanted to get their hands on a good list of female clients so they could find a very rich woman to date (clients all have $10 mil+). One guy even claimed that he had another friend that did this successfully and dated only heiresses.

      [CH: #coolstorybroad]

      I asked two of the guys if they would rather date a very pretty girl with no money or an average looking girl with $10 million dollars. One looked contemplative and said he didn’t know the answer and the other answered that he’d take the rich woman. Hey, I knew finance came with maniacal levels of greed, but that surprised me.

      [I thought you claimed to be smart? Does the concept of revealed preference escape you?]

      LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 11:10 am Matthew King

        This is how women think. Proof by anecdote.

        It has everything to do with men being directed outward and women inward. Going out vs. staying in. Deeds vs. speech. Active vs. passive. Subject vs. object. Abstract vs. particular. World-oriented vs. home-oriented. Love of the good (which is fatherhood) vs. love of one’s own (motherhood). Justice vs. compassion. Truth vs. love.

        She doesn’t know any svelte secretaries, there are none in her immediate purview, therefore she doubts they exist. Her instinct is for a posteriori things she can touch rather than the manly a priori ideas he can interiorily extrapolate or imagine. It is the essential intellectual difference between the sexes which explains all the other differences. Which incidentally makes them terrible at argument and rhetoric, but excellent at special pleading.

        Matt

        LikeLike


  15. on January 28, 2014 at 12:56 pm SC

    Heartiste, I wholeheartedly disagree with you. First, you are assuming that beautiful and uneducated go together. They don’t. The high school dropouts and those with no more than a high school diploma are also the landwhales and future landwhales. Low social class and obesity go together like french fries and ketchup. Second, you are assuming that there are legions of uneducated high IQ people out there. It’s 2014 in America; practically everbody with an IQ of 105 or more has a bachelors degree. Having a bachelors degree doesn’t say much about a person these days, but not having one screams “Low IQ prole fattie with criminal record and bastard kids.”

    Also, what’s so bad about having high income inequality anyways? The people with low IQs and low impulse control largely get what they deserve. If you want to prevent dysgenics, how about paying $200 for each drug addict to get sterilised, ending most forms of welfare for baby mamas and their bastard spawn, and giving cash payments to any couple that has kids WITHIN marriage?

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 3:20 pm Grim

      Your statement about IQ and “2014 in America” is not correct about Latinas from South America. This is not liberal treehugging, so read carefully: many of them are high IQ (115 or 120) and truly did not have the “opportunity” that North American lawyercunts have (for which the North American cunts fail to be thankful). I have met MANY, and I mean MANY, Latinas who are very smart and would be lawyercunts (or at least have bachelor’s degrees) had they been born North Americans, but instead are traditionally feminine and willing to have children. They are truly smart, bi- or tri-lingual, beautiful, and extra smart in that they still embrace being women. They know their role. They are awesome, in fact, compared to white North American future spinsters who ride the cock carousel from age 18-34.

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:19 pm SC

        Okies, I am saying this from an uberwhite, SWPL perspective. Many Americans do not have the chance to meet Latinas because they live in homogeneously White locales. Also, what about the ppl who want to marry within their own race? I believe that the people who want to marry interracially should be allowed to do so, but people who want to marry within their race should also be allowed to do so.

        LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2014 at 10:51 pm FamilyMan

        Grim, I believe you are accurately recounting your experience.

        But how do you explain the absence of very smart latino men? Maybe latin intelligence tends to the verbal arts (women’s territory at school level at least) rather than STEM. So these women may be very smart in the things you seek from a woman, but they may be dumb as rocks at math and that’s OK. A corresponding latino man may be unimpressive verbally and somewhat better at math but still inept.

        LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 10:25 am chi-town

      Intelligence and education merely correlate with a career, but the relationship is not quite what it seems. A career benefits from specialization and the division of labor. The contribution of intelligent women has a high total utility, but does tend to be punished in the labor market. Imagine the difference if these women were raising educated slaves? If the output of a beautiful, intelligent woman had none of its own agency, then they would be worth millions. Imagine the capitalization of a trauma surgeon if he would be owned as a slave. The private markets only pay marginal utility. Total utility however is rather important, like water and air which is priceless but with low marginal utility.

      LikeLike


  16. on January 28, 2014 at 1:06 pm Maya

    ”I tell you now, break these assortative mating chains! Free! Free! Free at last! Thank God Almighty you are free at last to pursue love with a cute, worshipful underling and be a happy man again!”

    So you think men who mate with their ”equals” are not as happy as those who marry younger/less educated girls? I always had the same impression, that I wasn’t able to fall in love with men my own age and that relationships where the man is older and wife younger are more passionate and less boring.

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 1:42 pm GasButtox

      Maya,

      My buttox are full of gas, and have ballooned in size.

      If you position your face in the right way behind my buttox as I release the blast, you will benefit by receiving :

      1) Hair straightening, from the blast force
      2) Exfoliation of of your face, allowing fresh new skin to be in front
      3) Mustache and chin-hair removal, as they will be seared off.
      4) Aromatherapy
      5) Sinus and nasal decongestion
      6) Free heat during this cold winter.

      For this, I will charge you a $5000 fee. It will be your privilege to have your face positioned in the prime blast epicenter….

      [CH: you fuckin guys are bringing your A game today.]

      LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 8:57 am Maya

        Hi, CH 🙂

        LikeLike


  17. on January 28, 2014 at 1:06 pm fakeemail

    No good, Heartiste. Most men aren’t bosses. I’d bet most of the posters here aren’t lawyers, doctors, or executives. They’re men with jobs who aint ever going to be high enough on the totem-pole to attract a cute (white) secretary.

    Far more drastic measures are needed to restore universal harmony. Women must be punished for their choices and their choices must be highly limited.

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 1:55 pm corvinus

      You’re more likely to become a boss if you become an alpha first.

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:10 pm Caramba

        Must strongly disagree with you.You can’t become a boss without knowing how to negotiate and kiss other’s arses,and this is what betas do the best.

        Alphas usually work as doormen,bartenders,DJs and ,if they are lucky,business owners.

        Professionals (doctors,lawyers) are often more alpha than for example CEOs,because they often operate in a different environments.Especially you see plenty of alphas among doctors,since the profession requires a lot of decision taking on your own,unlike a corporate environment or politics where you just need to follow a certain strategy to get on top..

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:31 pm corvinus

        You can’t become a boss without knowing how to negotiate and kiss other’s arses,and this is what betas do the best.

        Not sure what environment you’ve seen this in, but where I am, betas most certainly do not do better. For example, when offered a salary, betas will jump at whatever their potential boss offers, and be exploited, dutifully doing whatever his boss(es) want and not get any credit for it, while an alpha will pick up his balls and haggle it upward.

        Kissing ass is something that happens to alphas naturally. That requires, of course, the alpha being in the superior position to begin with. From what I’ve seen, ass-kissers tend to be beta try-hards, and they don’t tend to end up at the top of the totem pole unless the target of their ass-kissing has self-esteem problems himself. Again, they end up used, even if they’re used by being immediately subordinate to whomever they’re ass-kissing rather than something more lowly. They’re bitches, in other words. (Think of Smithers in The Simpsons.)

        And doctors, alpha? Not here in the USA at least, not by a long shot. But lawyers, yes, they often are.

        Bartenders, sure. The alpha bartender will end up being the bar manager, and will have started off as a doorman. But in those cases, they don’t want a lot of money anyway, and are happy with the amount they do make.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:05 pm Caramba

        Doctors are often alphas in competitive specialties (orthopedics, surgery, cardiology).But in low competition specialties doctors are betas,usually asian nerds and chicks of sorts.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 5:10 pm Scray

        it goes back to first principles — alphas are comfortable with risk, betas are not.

        An alpha, in a high-status profession, will be more likely to just hang up his own shingle. Or, if he gets into BIGLAW or some shit, he will be more likely to start rainmaking (rather than relegating himself to bullshit endless memo billables). Either way, he will handle his own shit and build his own empire — he will start creating value at go.

        So, the alpha is more likely to hang up his own shingle after law school or engage himself in a high-stress competitive environment in the medical field (surgery probably). With time, an alpha will create his own tribe/empire/whatever.

        A beta will just leech off an already established empire/tribe.

        I’m glad I learned all of this shit when I did, at the outset of my career. Fuck joining someone else’s bullshit.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:30 pm Matthew

        I’m going to classify this as Scray Persona A. Full sentences. No ellipses. Proper use of emdash.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 12:23 pm Scray

        You should label the other Scray Persona “MD.” 🙂

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 11:14 pm Matthew

        I’m just going to be boring and use the alphabet.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 11:25 pm corvinus

        it goes back to first principles — alphas are comfortable with risk, betas are not.

        Sort of. Depends upon if he’s sure he knows what he’s doing when taking a risk, it’s something he’s familiar with, and he knows how to bounce back if whatever he tries crashes.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 12:19 pm Scray

        Seems implicit.

        LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 2:02 pm Caramba

      Even if they are bosses,they are not necessary the captains of the ship.

      “to restore the universal harmony”..When was this harmony?In 19 century?I doubt this.I just happen to read a brilliant short story today,by the russian genius and my all time favorite writer Anton Chekhov,called “Women’s Good Fortune”.

      Pretty much shows how betaised russian men were already back in 1885,in times of patriarchy.Could not read without cringing.

      http://www.pushkins-poems.com/Chekhov16.htm (in english)

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:33 pm corvinus

        Pretty much shows how betaised russian men were already back in 1885,in times of patriarchy.Could not read without cringing.

        My brother was recently on the Moscow metro, and had a run-in with a bitchy girl who kept putting her feet up on the seat. Finally, he had had enough, and knocked her feet off the seat, saying, “Quit being a bitch!” and he actually got yelled at by several white knights. The conductor came over and ruled in my brother’s favor, but as a parting shot, one of the white knights punched my brother in the back of the head.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:01 pm Caramba

        This what I keep telling to all you guys.Especially to the imbeciles of the “Roosh witnesses” sect.Russia is the land of betas and white knights.

        Btw read the story-you will love it.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 9:44 pm corvinus

        Btw read the story-you will love it.

        Hahaha, exactly. Exaaactly.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 3:01 pm thwack

        one of the white knights punched my brother in the back of the head.
        ————————————————————

        Did your brother stab him?

        [CH: Dude curb the trolling. Drive-bys are ok if they’re witty, funny or trenchant. This one is none of them.]

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 4:36 am thwack

        Sorry dad, I’ll try and stifle my inner Viking.

        BTW, what are you doing for Black History Month? Can I do a guest post on Grimaldi Man?

        ********************
        Grimaldi man was a name given in the early 20th century to an Italian find of two paleolithic skeletons, supposedly showing negroid traits. When found, the skeletons were the subject of dubious scientific theories on human evolution, partly fueled by biased reconstruction of the skulls by the scientists involved. In the 1960s, the Grimaldi find, together with various other European finds of early modern humans, was classified as Cro-Magnon (in the wider sense), though the term “European Early Modern Humans” is today preferred for this assemblage. The true nature of Grimaldi man is still a subject of controversy.
        *******************

        They are trying to write the G man out of history by saying he wasn’t really a brotha. But, they also found several of those carved “Venus” statues with huge tits and fat asses near him ( Im not joking) but the white man is now saying they belong to some other cave man at a different time.

        You see how they do a brotha wrong?

        He din do nuffin, he was tryin too turn his life around.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 5:38 am thwack

        Here are the Grimaldi bitches:

        http://donsmaps.com/grimaldivenus.html

        BTW– they could be fakes. At the time they were found all the European countries were challenging each other for the title of “first white man”; so there was a lot of fakery going on.

        The U.S even got in on it with “Nebraska man”

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 1:04 pm yeahokcool

        I prefer Alabama Man. http://youtu.be/BrimMyOoEDA

        LikeLike


  18. on January 28, 2014 at 1:26 pm Ronin

    Not from the best thriller ever, but:

    “… Molière married his housemaid, didn’t he, and made a great success of it-if it -is Molière I mean. If a man’s frantic with brains, he doesn’t really want a woman who’s also frantic with brains to talk to. It would be exhausting. He’d much prefer a lovely nitwit who can make him laugh…”
    -Agatha Christie

    LikeLike


  19. on January 28, 2014 at 1:32 pm tspark156

    On topic and not surprising in the least
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2547221/First-female-Red-Arrow-Kirsty-Stewart-set-marry-squadron-leader-Ben-Murphy.html

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 1:55 pm everybodyhatesscott

      I see currie hultgreen syndrome in her future

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:27 pm Anonymous

        Vox makes an interesting point. I’ve assumed for some time now that we are on the precipice of the first death in the NFL. But, the idea that it could be a female ref being run over had not occurred to me. A definite possibility, were they to be allowed on the field.

        [CH: Maybe that’s the plan all along. Get a woman into a traditional male institution, make it easier to “reform” that institution out of existence.]

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 2:45 am Le Corsaire

        @CH: Yep. Shannon Faulkner and The Citadel. That institution spent the 20th century turning boys into not just men, but soldiers and leaders. Now The Citadel will likely spend a significant portion of the first part of this century fighting sexual [fill-in-the-grievance-blank] lawsuits and redesigning its curricula to include more sensitivity and diversity. The big question is, will places like The Citadel and VMI survive to the end of this century?

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 2:35 pm tspark156

        Had to look that one up. It says she is now a Squadron Leader which doesn’t necessarily mean she is still flying, but she will probably kill herself attempting to prove that chicks can cut it as a member of the RAF Regiment. It says she is an Iraq veteran implying that she flew fast jest combat ops in theatre, which is not the case.

        LikeLike


  20. on January 28, 2014 at 2:50 pm whiskeysplace

    If you want the White birthrate up, women have to start having kids at age 16 or so like Mexicans and Blacks. No other way around it. Which means, though I don’t like it, lowering age of consent to normalize White women having four-five kids starting at 16-17 not one designer eugenic sperm donor baby at age 37 by a “professional” single mom.

    In other words, White birthrate up = normalizing a fifteen year old dating/screwing a 32 year old, aka “Paul Walker style.” Don’t like it, but fertility is what it is. And Whites must engage in the birth rate arms race.

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 3:24 pm FamilyMan

      Agree on the facts, disagree on the “likes”. The age of consent has never been over 16 except very very recently. The human animal hasn’t changed, it’s just laws and customs have been put in place to reduce population.

      I am not attached to those laws in any emotional sense. I can even see Obamacare helping. Look, the new model is that kids can’t get jobs anyway so they stay at home, on their parents’ insurance plan until age 25. (Obamacare.) So what are they doing after age 18 in the case of boys and about 16 in the case of girls? Well, they are living at the boys’ parents’ house in a spare bedroom, starting the family.

      I just don’t know if when she marries, can she still be on her parents’ insurance plan, or on his parents’ plan, or is she kicked off altogether. But I don’t think they would kick her off entirely, because that wouldn’t be pro-female. So this will probably work, and by the time they’re 25, they have 3 kids at least and things are on the right track.

      LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 5:21 pm BlackPoisonSoul

        Around 1300s in England the age of consent was 12 (for marriage). The harmonised laws in Europe around that time said 12-14 for marriage, though consent (for marriage) could be meaningful if the children were older than 7.

        In the USA as late as 1880s most states had the minimum age of consent and marriage at 10-12 years.

        18+ years these days, while having younger girls acting as models. This effectively putting them up as images of sexual maturity that you cannot touch and all older women should aspire to. While at the same time selling the message that 35+yo women are at the peak of their sexuality and fertility.

        Yeh no surprise people are screwed in the head. Twisted and enraged to the max hah.

        CH is right, find a virgin from another country if you want kiddies. Ameriskank and other western trash is reserved for dropping a random fuck into.

        LikeLike


      • on January 28, 2014 at 8:33 pm whiskeysplace

        Steve Sailer points out that Western Europeans married late; we have ample documentation of English marriage rates historically back the 1200s (“Farewell to Alms”) around age 25. Malthus was avoided by delayed marriage/childbirth. Reduced fertility is the Western Way. There is also the age pyramid, older guys with younger women leaves younger guys fishing in a reduced pool; assuming a lag in fertility increase. I think older guys have a responsibility to the younger ones not screw things up for them any worse. That’s just me.

        But fertility is what it is: utterly dependent on having kids while young, late teens basically.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 3:25 am Le Corsaire

        “There is also the age pyramid, older guys with younger women leaves younger guys fishing in a reduced pool; assuming a lag in fertility increase. I think older guys have a responsibility to the younger ones not screw things up for them any worse.”

        I know the original point in this sub thread was about increasing White fertility, and I agree with you on your final point. But I must challenge this notion of yours that an “age pyramid” is a potential problem.

        If you’re talking about a society where polygamy is legal, perhaps you would see this effect. The effect this sort of “reduced pool of mates” has had on the culture of certain Middle Eastern countries (Saudi Arabia for example) has been discussed here plenty, as I’m sure you know. And it can get out of hand in a polygamous society (see early Mormon communities)

        But “the older guys have a responsibility to the younger guys not to screw things up”? Screw things up how? By pitching the woo to younger women? Competition from older males actually does the younger males a favor if it causes the juniors to delay marriage, get some experience or education (even if it’s the school of hard knocks), and generally make something of themselves before starting a family.

        To bring it back somewhat to fertility, or at least fertility’s next door neighbor, infant survivability, who is better able to aid a young mother in her quest to keep her offspring safe, nourished, and healthy? A 20-yr. old (the younger guy you’re trying to make way for) with an associate’s degree from his community college or a 33-yr. old with several promotions under his belt, a nest egg, and marketable skills that the 20-yr. old does not have (not to mention the general plus of having one’s head screwed on straighter at 30-33 than it was at 20)?

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 11:56 am ryan vann

        Judging by the state of things today, the how is less important than the can. Older (the worst a x) generations have made a mess of everything.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 7:58 am Hugh G. Rection

        How exactly would get any accurate data for marriage dating back centuries?

        LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2014 at 7:40 am thwack

        The churches often kept records since they were usually the only literate people in Europe and had the protection of the king. (The kings men could do it but people were more likely to tell the truth to the clergy than to the tax man)

        LikeLike


  21. on January 28, 2014 at 3:18 pm FamilyMan

    Assortative mating is a byproduct of sorting. Men and women of roughly similar ability are sorted into colleges where some of them start reproducing or at least meet the future spouse. When women had to be schoolteachers, it was harder to see which were the really bright women. Nowadays the women are sorted more ruthlessly than the men.

    CH postulates what the value of a woman is. Economics tells that the woman’s market value is what the market (men) will “pay” for her. I’ll split the difference though. Men will tend to date females they see. If you put the guy in a men’s college and he goes to the local secretarial school for his dates, which used to be fairly typical, you will get those pairings.

    Zombie is definitely right, math + math = math + asd (autism spectrum disorder, not anti-slut defense). In other words, the next generation’s most likely consumers of “game” writings, as it is perfectly pitched for their (including my) style.

    Most important is to start filling those girls’ wombs young. Online education can help, Take a nice girl off the market early, put her in your house and enroll her in online education programs. She can be taking courses at home while pregnant or tending to young kids.

    LikeLike


  22. on January 28, 2014 at 3:41 pm FamilyMan

    Assortative mating produces some issues with autism, but it also probably produces more geniuses or near geniuses. Assortative mating most certainly happens in China, where the universities are a more efficient sorting mechanism than they are here. No affirmative action bullshit, your score on an achievement test that can discriminate at high levels determines your college placement. You can retake next year but nobody bothers, the test is brutal but widely believed to be fair.

    India has an exam based system too, but they have quotas (affirmative action) for disadvantaged groups like the Untouchables. So their system is less efficient than China’s.

    If we don’t have assortative mating and they do, they’ll be inventing all the new stuff in 30 years. We want to keep our share I would think.

    LikeLike


    • on January 28, 2014 at 4:24 pm Harland

      China’s gaokao is certainly not fair. It’s a bunch of bullshit is what it is. You get one shot and if you have a cold or something that day, tough shit. You get sorted into a college, and from then on your life is ruled by this event. Companies pay salaries depending on what “rank” university you went to and if you didn’t go to a great one, like most Chinese, it follows you all your life.

      LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 3:41 am Le Corsaire

      Interesting. When would you say assortative mating became the majority mating paradigm in the U.S.? I haven’t studied it well enough to know, but we did pretty well technologically 1941-1980 I’d say. Atomic bomb, polyester, put a man on the moon, personal computer industry, etc (trying to point out examples of achievement that were more ‘team effort’ and not largely the work of one or two genius-level men).

      LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 7:24 am Gro Haila

        Well, the one time double-whammy of zhyd and sympathisers’ importation in the 30s followed by the importation of fascisst and economic refugee in the 40s could not possibly have played a role, now, would it?

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 8:47 am Montgomery Draxel (@MDraxel)

        Most of those were achievements due to the state of the rest of the world after WW2 and competition between two superpowers.

        Now that all the other nations have long since rebuilt from being bombed to shit, or (mostly) given up on communism – the world is in decline as there is no force promoting the intelligent and fit to breed. The west is subsidizing the procreation of low IQ dirtbags that will overwhelm the system in a few generations.

        LikeLike


  23. on January 28, 2014 at 5:27 pm ACG1

    Many here will probably see this as a weakness in my game, but I never could create any semblance of a bond with a girl who wasn’t exceptionally smart. Me conversing with a girl of average intelligence ends up being painful on both ends; she’s thinking “this guy is insane, what the fuck is he talking about” and I’m thinking “can anything come out of this chick’s mouth besides canned, vapid, unoriginal, substanceless drivel I’ve heard 1000 times before”. Given the crowd a website of this nature attracts, I can’t be alone in that regard.

    I know no one here minds dumbing himself down to rent a vagina for the night, but CH is talking marriage here… that is, recommending right-tailed IQ men dumb themselves down for life. That is not a recipe for happiness.

    LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 12:54 am Heywood Jablome

      I’m in that situation often. But gaming smart girls has a downside.

      Smart young things tend to be college-educated, which means they’re usually indoctrinated to be lefty feminists, which then requires deprogramming.

      Sometimes it’s easier on my nerves to pursue a pretty but dim girl for physical stimulation. I look for intellectual stimulation from my male (and 30+ year old smart married female) friends.

      LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 3:23 am DB

      Exactly, this is a quality-of-life issue for some people. I wish the best of luck to those who can be genuinely happy staying with a secretary-type (especially those who’ve been under social pressure not to act on that), but I cannot for multiple reasons.

      LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 3:54 am Le Corsaire

      If you were raised to believe – and still do – that you should seek intellectual fulfillment (or, as you seem to indicate, emotional fulfillment (the “bond” you speak of) stemming from intellectual engagement) from your spouse, your female spouse – then yes, a right-side/left-side pairing (to borrow your terminology) is going to be painful. If you continue to believe that. Have you had enough intellectual conversations with your male peers to say honestly that women provide as much intellectual stimulation as men do? I’m trying to rule out selection bias here.

      LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 8:19 am The Burninator

      Perhaps entering into masculine societies would help fulfill that requirement? I get not wanting a woman so stupid that she needs detailed explanations, in monosyllabic words, as to why she needs to tie her shoes, but really the whole “super educated” broad always turns me off. Yes, she may be educated, but outside of hooking you her conversation level will taper off eventually then you’ll be stuck with a broad who turns her “education” into more elaborate webs to weave around you to try to betatize you.

      While I presume we hold a similar intellectual capacity, I also presume we do not frequent the same social circles. Have you looked into more masculine leaning hobbies (for example, astronomy clubs or other hard science clubs, zymurgy, etc)? Personally I have more or less abandoned the idea of deep intellectual, onion layer type conversations with people in real life, though to be honest this is anti-productive and I shouldn’t have taken this course, however I find that I satisfy my need for manly company by hanging out with crowds of men who are generally alpha grade in most areas outside of intellect (bikers aka motorcyclist clubs, hunting clubs, fishing gatherings, etc). There is one semi-“secret” society that is forming in my area that focuses on Scotch, shooting, wealth and manly pursuits, so I may be looking into that shortly, I was invited a couple of months ago and never took up the invite. I say its semi-secret because the founders have not made it public and have no intention of making it official or in any way visible to the law, ergo, they get to avoid the brash, loud mouthed feminist slags trying to force their way in via the courts.

      Now that I think about it, this is one of the first things we need to re-establish to return to manliness – mens clubs (and I don’t mean strip joints) and organizations. Fulfill the need for more complex discussions and musings away from the home then you won’t need the feminist-pushed notions that the height of intellectual fulfillment must come from being able to discuss Socrates with one’s wife.

      Just thinking out loud here.

      LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 9:20 am DB

        I’m looking to start a family. Compromising on my partner’s intelligence may as well be suicide: not only am I stuck with someone I probably don’t really want to be stuck with for the rest of my life, but I also seriously worsen the odds of ending up with kids I’d really get along with. I’d much, much rather be part of a “math + math” pairing with a possibly increased risk of aspie kids, and then minimize that risk with appropriate parenting (expose the kid primarily to living things rather than machines until they’re outside the developmental danger zone), since the expected payoff is way higher.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 11:00 am The Burninator

        You are a free man to learn the lesson as you will. I was you at one time, with regards to preference for a highly intelligent woman. Experience has changed my tune entirely. Again, not plumb dumb, more rather smart without being “intellectual”. At all costs I avoid the “math chick” now, since she’ll use those skills eventually to try and control you, and being a woman that you love, will have a good chance of succeeding at. If she doesn’t, then your life becomes one of constant torture since you can no longer have those deep and interesting discussions about Hegel, yet you’re stuck with having a high maintenance plotter against your happiness on your hands daily.

        But some people have to touch the stove (my son is one such person, for example). I don’t hold your preference against you, just a few words of warning from a guy who did what you’re wanting to do, and who has seen the same thing at play with other men.

        You do get smart kids though. You’ll enjoy paying child support for them more I suppose, heh.

        Seriously, there’s more to be found in intellectual conversations to satisfy when out and about with other men over the course of a year, than you’ll find over a lifetime with a “smart” chick.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 11:58 am SFG

        Pretty much. The mistake (aided and abetted by modern feminism) is to assume that your demand for intellectual stimulation must be satisfied by your woman, rather than by men of similar tastes.

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 3:48 pm DB

        When the choice is between

        i. a wife who might divorce me, but who I actually like and who’ll probably be good for at least one kid I really connect with
        ii. a wife I do not really care for AND 10x worse odds on kids

        I’ll take my chances on the child support, and it’s not a close decision. Compartmentalization of adult intellectual stimulation does not change this; (ii) is almost strictly worse than never marrying, while (i) is not.

        LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 10:59 am The Spirit Within

      Exactly. The barbarism often advocated by this site — get ’em young, hot, and tight because nothing else matters in a woman — fails to capture the more realistic choices that we make in modern society.

      Pick someone you can *live* with.

      LikeLike


  24. on January 28, 2014 at 5:40 pm Charlie Dont Surf

    I’m dating my secretary …

    Last night after work, I took her to the local pub for dinner.

    These broads at the bar shouted “pedophile” and “cradle robber” at me!

    Made a big scene – Just because she’s 21 and I’m 45.

    They completely ruined our 10th anniversary…

    LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 2:16 am The Spirit Within

      rimshot

      LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 8:23 am BuenaVista

      When I’m in NYC I take my daughter out, who is 25. She tries to dress ‘older’, but she can’t do anything about her pedigree (her mom and grandmother were ex-Vogue models.) Everyone — *everyone* — assumes we’re dating.

      The men stare, the matrons bristle, sneer, and at 21 Club for her birthday one of them actually elbowed me as I was sitting down, then later refused to let me get up until I finally looked at her elderly husband (who had been leering at me for an hour, poor guy). (The room we eat in has banquets lining the walls, so you’re 12 inches from your neighbor.) They sneer at my daughter and ignore the smallest kindnesses (e.g., opening a door). Hard to describe the hostility one gets from the older women. Later the waiter actually wanted to shake my hand, and the couple next to us (middle-aged but happy) bought us desert, again refusing to believe (after I told them) that she was my daughter. I’d say there are many, many older men living in deep despair with their tired veteran wives.

      Interestingly, when we go to a ‘cool’ spot, and everybody’s younger, the female waiters and bartenders are very friendly; they don’t act like I’m a monster from the sexual predators wing of Rikers. So in that context, pre-selection bias (and perhaps Daddy erotica predilections) kicks in with greater force than I’ve ever seen it.

      LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 10:04 am Amy

        This happens all the time with my father and me, he is handsome and youthful looking. My stepmother is well known in their town so when he and I go out to lunch or dinner there, she hears gossip that my dad is cheating on her with a young blonde. And of course she laughs and says “no, that’s his daughter!”

        So I told my dad…. if you cheat on her, make sure it’s with a young blonde. Lol!

        LikeLike


      • on January 29, 2014 at 1:06 pm yeahokcool

        Lol!

        LikeLike


  25. on January 28, 2014 at 8:23 pm cortesar

    Another lunacy in the lunatic asylum called Sweden

    Gender Bias Fought At Egalia Preschool In Stockholm, Sweden
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/26/gender-bias-egalia-preschool_n_884866.html

    Leftoid lunatics brainwashing the kids 1-6 in the kindergarten called Egalia payed by Swedish taxpayers
    There will be no enough lamp posts on Stockholm streets when time comes to erase these degenerates

    LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 11:35 am corvinus

      The (native) Swedes actually have an advantage over, say, the Danes in that the leftoids running Sweden are going full over-the-top Bolsheviks while the Danish authorities are softer boil-the-frog-in-the-pot Mensheviks.

      Expect Swedes to evolve into take-no-BS reactionaries far quicker than the Danes.

      LikeLike


  26. on January 28, 2014 at 8:43 pm Just saying

    Humanity needs smart women marrying smart men leads to smart kids. Those smart kids improve our lives much more than janitors, factory workers, and gardeners.
    The Jews have done much more to improve our lives than 300 million+ Arabs.

    LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 5:33 am SFG

      You must be new here.

      LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 7:18 am Gro Haila

      Let us not confuse merchandising with producing.

      LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 12:52 pm corvinus

      It only seems that way on the surface. You’re wrong.

      LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 10:28 am Director

      These third Worlders are in the west because of YKW … It’s a shame you don’t see it.

      See the story in Genesis:

      Jacob manages Laban’s flocks in exchange for one thing: the speckled sheep. Or mixed breed. Jews shit stir homogenous populations for their own gain.

      LikeLike


  27. on January 28, 2014 at 11:03 pm Lightning Round – 2014/01/29 | Free Northerner

    […] The Boss-Secretary sexual strategy. […]

    LikeLike


  28. on January 29, 2014 at 12:23 am Hugh G. Rection

    It always rubs me the wrong way that “educated” is now used in place of “smart” or “intelligent”.

    LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 12:47 am Heywood Jablome

      Say that to the typical 20-something girl & you’ll get a blank stare.

      LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 11:56 am SFG

      ‘Educated’ is the more important for women, as it connotes status.

      I’d say the Duck Dynasty guys are pretty smart, even if they’re not educated.

      LikeLike


  29. on January 29, 2014 at 1:40 am The CH Boss-Secretary Sexual Strategy To Reduce...

    […] Your lovable overlord CH is on record advocating the “Boss-Secretary Sexual Strategy” (BoSSS) to reduce income inequality and increase the fertility rate among the better classes.  […]

    LikeLike


  30. on January 29, 2014 at 2:18 am The Spirit Within

    Richard Florida has been talking about this “reshuffling” for years now. He blogs at The Atlantic.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/10/where-the-skills-are/308628/

    LikeLike


  31. on January 29, 2014 at 9:46 am Grim

    lzolzozlzozolzlozlzozzlz

    http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/01/29/republicans_rolled_out_their_new_woman_strategy_during_the_state_of_the.html

    LikeLike


  32. on January 29, 2014 at 10:50 am Amy

    Back in the day, smart women from upper middle-middle class backgrounds could really only be three things: teacher, nurse, or secretary. They usually worked until they got married, and if they kept working afterward, these generally low-stress flexible jobs could be compatible with raising kids and running a household. So a man could marry an intelligent girl from a good family without running into clashing occupational demands and all the relationship problems that come with it.

    But then we had the feminist movement, and smart women were told they shouldn’t be teachers, nurses or secretaries; oh no, it wasn’t good enough for them. They were told they should be doctors and lawyers and senior executives, just like men. So yesterday’s sweet, smart, upper middle class secretary gets turned into today’s bitchy, rushed, unfulfilled lawyer, and the women filling the secretary jobs tend to be lower on the class and competence totem pole. (Of course, exceptions abound.)

    This is bad news for high value men who want to marry a woman from a similar socioeconomic background, because those women are now in the “masculine” professions. This problem could so easily be solved if girls (of any socioeconomic background) who want kids were encouraged to pursue professions that were family friendly. Thanks to feminism, not only are they not encouraged, they’re browbeaten if they even suggest it.

    LikeLike


    • on January 29, 2014 at 6:29 pm Charlie Dont Surf

      Very bad news …

      So – Would you abandon your profession today for a husband and children?

      I’d fall into the high value category – socioeconomically, intellectually, physically – I’m in the prime of my life – and I work with women of and in the same station. Equals in every way …. except; They’re past their primes.

      Squandered it on degrees, long hours and collecting possessions.

      Poor dryed-out careerists … But, hey – they have JOB satisfaction.

      Each Christmas, I make sure to get them each a nice cat calendar.

      LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2014 at 3:46 pm Amy

        Sure.

        LikeLike


      • on January 30, 2014 at 4:43 pm Charlie Dont Surf

        Then …

        Set up a small home-based business publishing Christmas Cat Calendars.

        You’ll make a fortune.

        LikeLike


    • on January 30, 2014 at 10:21 am Sidewinder

      Just like a woman to blame some external force on her decision making. It’s the feminist boogieman! That’s who’s responsible! Kids, especially little girls, are spoiled beyond the limits of sanity. And on those rare occasions when they don’t get their way, they throw a little fit and end up getting what they want. Little boys aren’t growing up until their early 30s.

      Little baby girls need to take responsibility for their own lives. If you want a family, you need to start making arrangements so that outcome will be possible. That means 16 and 17 year old girls need to at least start a very deep and meaningful conversation with themselves about what they want in life.

      LikeLike


    • on January 30, 2014 at 4:59 pm Lara

      It does seem as if a lot of professions are more family friendly now. As you’ve pointed out, that was not always the case.

      LikeLike


    • on January 30, 2014 at 5:01 pm Lara

      Nursing or teaching are considered respectable professions. I don’t hear girls say they want to be secretaries anymore.

      LikeLike


  33. on January 30, 2014 at 9:58 am Sidewinder

    Great idea in theory, terrible in practice. The problem? The culture of the pretty proles is such that they have greater than a 50% chance of filing for divorce. It may be closer to 75%. The hot proles, thanks to our relativistic cultures, are almost all sluts.

    The rare, virtuous and sexy prole woman? College. Her virtue is largely the result of high IQ and “free money” student loans ensure that they will continue their education, not end up secretaries.

    Virtue and IQ are inseparable because virtue is largely about the capability of placing yourself in the shoes of another, future time orientation, and effective organization. These girls can see the likely results of giving in to impulse, and they therefore avoid it. They also do their homework and study for class, using this same foresight.

    CH, there is no population of attractive, smart as a tack, working class prole women. Those with the requisite virtue/IQ to marry very quickly rise out of the prole class.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Dread Forman on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Amon Ra on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Carlos Danger on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Amon Ra on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
    • Deep State Update: Keeping It In The Family For A Reason
    • This Is What Separate Dating Markets Are For (Or: White Vs Black Thirst)
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: