Reader Charlie Don’t Surf waxed poetical and quasi-biblical,
16 Commandments of Pajamaboy:
First off, I love you
I’ll never look at another woman
You’re my everything
I’ll do anything you say
I’ll do double for you
This is exactly how I feel
You’re my one and only
I’m sorry – I’m sorry – I’m sorry
I won’t play with your emotions
You’re beauty is awe inspiring
I’m so unsure of myself
I’m not good at anything
Best we take it slow
That’s all I got … I’ll get you a towel
You’re my master
If you leave – I’m going to die.
Coming Soon to a marital bathhouse near you: The Wreck of the Pajamaboy Cuckold.
(bring a tissue, because this one is an emotionally charged tearjerker!)
***
First COTW Runner-up is Scray, presenting for your delectation a how-to guide for manipulating gossip whores to your personal advantage,
I’m pretty sure that the greatest, best contrast game to master is ‘snake in the grass’ beta imitation game. Promise commitment, flowers, etc. up until the bang. Then proceed to go full asshole. I would think that this would maximize a man’s short-term mate quality.
If it gets back around to me — and I fucking hope it’s a girl who asks — “oh yeah, I really wanted to give her everything….but she just wasn’t ready.” My word against hers. And since a) girls LOVE fucking over their friends and b) girls are also jealous of their friends and likely to believe the worst….and c) because the girl is better looking than me, so the scenario likely has played out this way before…the chances of me coming out smelling like a rose seem pretty high. Not to mention having a shot at the friend, now.
Leverage women’s natural dispensation to backstab other women to your advantage, i.e., “muddy the estrogenic waters”. A helpful reminder: A lot of naturals are really as malign as evidenced in the ploy above. But they don’t put their machinations to pen on internet forums, or, really, think much at all about their actions. Plausible deniability is king of kings.
We discuss what works here, not necessarily what’s righteous in the eyes of the Chateau Overlord. “He said, she said” can backfire, though, especially if the “He” is a dude most women would automatically distrust. So I wouldn’t classify it as any sort of tried-and-true Game technique; it’s just an old-fashioned lie that can occasionally pay big dividends (if you don’t care about the long-term fallout).
***
Second COTW Runner-up is none other than that flatus of nature known as da GBFM,
loxoxozozzzozooz
wheneverd da GBFM see his twelve inch lotoattss cockas againstz her milky white skin and blond puzuzyyzyzyzyzyz, dat is high contrast game!!! zllzlzzzo
Finally figured it out. The lozzololzzzlol is GBFM motorboating.
lozzololzzzlol
LikeLike
lzozozolzolzozol
The Higher Form of Game: Exalting The Spirit of Genesis, Moses, and Jesus–The Great Books For Men–in Our Schools, Homes, Universities, Churches, and Culture
The Higher Form of Game: Exalting The Spirit of Genesis, Moses, and Jesus–The Great Books For Men–in Our Schools, Homes, Universities, Churches, and Culture
Yes, ’tis a sad state of affairs with modern American/Western women and the decline of the family–liberty’s foundational building block.
We would all like to change it, so we must ask. “How did this come to be?”
Why did women come to disregard Genesis, the Law of Moses, and the Divine Wisdom of Jesus Christ?
Follow the money, and one soon sees that the less time a woman devotes to her family, the more time she can devote to the corporation. The less time a woman spends cooking meals, the more time she can spend cooking the books in a sub-prime loan office.
‘Tis a short-term and destructive strategy–to encourage women to abort and pursue the material over the spiritual. But some do profit off of feminism–those who grow the State.
I hope that in 2014 Good Men realize that the higher form of game is returning Genesis, the Law of Moses, and the wisdom of Jesus not just to the choir, but to our courts, schools, universities, and churches, and then, perhaps, we may again begin to see it in our homes.
lzozozozozozozo
LikeLike
Only after a collapse, barring divine intervention. This generation wants nothing to do with honor, virtue, or Truth:
Buy ammo.
LikeLike
HERE ARE OSME VALENTINESZ DAY CLOTHINGZ FOR YOUR
BERNANIKFIED
WIFE/FIANCE/GIRLFIRENDZ:
http://www.cafepress.com/greatbooksformen
zlozozozozozozozozoozozzlzozllzzzloz
give her a bernankakife Tshirt with lotsa chocaltes!!! lzozozllzoz
LikeLike
> “A helpful reminder: A lot of naturals are really as malign as evidenced in the ploy above. But they don’t put their machinations to pen on internet forums, or, really, think much at all about their actions.”
If anyone here hasn’t read it yet, then it is IMPERATIVE that you at least skim the available chapter which the estate has posted online [about the natural “Alpha” psychopath, “Stanley”]:
From: The Mask of Sanity
By Hervey M. Cleckley
Fifth Edition: © 1988 Emily S. Cleckley
9. Stanley
http://cassiopaea.com/cassiopaea/cleckley.pdf
More Cleckley at Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/s/?field-keywords=Hervey+Cleckley
The mind of the true psychopath [to the extent that the true psychopath even has a “mind’ at all] is simply horrifying.
Those mother fuckers literally do not have a conscience.
At all.
LikeLike
Which is why bitching about women is for losers. Which is why Men’s Rights Activists and MGTOWMEOW are destined to fall on their faces.
The best women can give as good as they get. They are adept at “machinations” and like to get hustled. They want to play the game. It’s a fun game.
The game is only “psychopath[ic]” and unconscionable when you are dealing with wilting flowers and average jills. Otherwise, women want to get roughed up psychologically. And when they send out the bitch signals they are broadcast shit tests trying to ping someone who can handle her level of game.
That’s how you make a top-tier, model-hot, vacant-eyed, soulless, nihilist Frankfurt diaper baby into the good girl that Zombie talks about. That is, if you catch her young enough before the concrete sets. They are waiting for their master.
Matt
LikeLike
Prior to 19 might work. One prior lover max.
LikeLike
Prior to 25 is the physiological cut-off. As the attractiveness begins its slow slide to the cliff, her mind equally gradually hardens into unbreakable rigidities.
Unfortunately, our depraved societal fuck-all has already had its way with most of them between 16 and 20, so the quarter-century limit is hardly ever tested, and they bounce around as cum-bags thereafter until the splatter against the wall.
LikeLike
HEY HEARTISTETSTSZZ!! NEXT TIME OUR BAND GETS TOGETHER WE NEED TO COVER MY FAVORITE DSONGZ!!!
MOTORBOATINGZ!
Motorboating!
What’s your price for cockas?
Da GBFM is MR. RIGHT!
You’ll get da gbfm llzlozzozlzoozzloozing tonight!
But you’re motorboating!!!! Motorboating lolzlzlzlzol
Motorboating!
What’s your price for cockas?
Da GBFM is MR. RIGHT!
You’ll get da gbfm llzlozzozlzoozzloozing tonight!
But you’re motorboating!!!! Motorboating lolzlzlzlzol
zlozozolzolzolzlzozozozo
LikeLike
Not motorboating. Cock gurgling. We discussed this.
LikeLike
lzozozoz MOTORBOATING!
MOTORBOATING! lzozozozoz
LikeLike
I thought GBFM was excluded from COTW, just so the rest of us would have a chance.
LikeLike
you misundertsood da memoz my secretetatries sent out!
When she wrote, “GBFM is exlcuded from COTW to give everyone a chance,” she was talking about COCKAS OF THE WEEK!
lzozozozozozloolzo
yah, as a beneveloent dicktator, da GBFM took his benevolent dickasz out of da COCKAS OF DA WEEK pool zlozozozozlzozo
it is because i
luvz my brotehzz
as i luvz myselfz
as JEsus commandneth us to do
zlzolzozlolzoz
LikeLike
CDS COTW @ HR Training: HB8 Secretary in push-up bra – asks;
“Can saying Jesus Loves You be considered sexual harassment ?”
While I was day dreaming of spanking her with the Gideons in a 5 star hotel.
LikeLike
OK, she wasn’t an 8, but I’ve done that.
LikeLike
Jesus Christ Exalted the Law of Moses, not Dalrock / Vox Gamey Game. More Gamey Churchians Threaten to Ban and Censor the Words of Da GBGM for Quoting Jesus Christ and Honoring THE LAW OF MOSES Over Gamey Churchian Butt and Gina Tingalalozozzoozzo
Churchians have no shame and deserve every divorce/broken marriage they get. Their failed gamey crusade shall soon be forgotten, while the Christ and Moses they castigated, ignored, belittled, censored, and impugned shall Rise Again and Serve the Rising Generation who honors the Law of Moses and our Lord Jesus Christ over gamey game and gina tiznzgzlzlozozozo.
“Those who live by the tingzlzozozozozl shall die by the tingzlzlzozozlzoz” -GBFM
http://donalgraeme.wordpress.com/2013/12/28/thoughts-on-marriage-and-game/
donalgraeme writes, “IV. Conclusion
It cannot be denied that before the advent of Marriage 2.0, it wasn’t necessary for Christian men to have to Game their wives. Nor did they face an environment which was set up to ruin marriage as much as possible. Unfortunately, we do live in the Marriage 2.0 regime now, and Christian men must adapt to the times.”
Real Christian Men would Man Up and Exalt Christ and Moses, rather than Denying Their Teachings, just to serve tingzlzlzzo and kneel before a woman’s whims.
donalgraeme writes, “For some men, that means a decision on their part not to marry. For others, that means marrying and accepting the possibility that their wives may blow up their marriages at any time, and they have no means of recourse.”
my tender little lamb donalgreme, if a woman can blow up a marriage at any time, IT IS NOT A CHRISTIAN MARRIAGE! Which do Churchians hate more–the teachings of Christ and Moses or the Obovious?
And what about Great Men like Heartiste who Speak the Truth That Sets Us Free?
donalgraeme writes, “Those Christian men who take their chances in marriage must use whatever methods of maintaining control in their marriage are available, with Game being one of the few things still left in the toolbox. Should any of this be necessary? Of course not. But these are evil and desperate times, and desperate times call for desperate measures.”
my tender little lamb donalgreme, if you enter into a non-Christian marriage and then have to act in a non-Christian, gamey manner bowing down beofre a woman’s tingzlzozoz instead of honoring Our Lord Jesus Christ and the Law of Moses to maintain the un-Christian marriage, how exactly are your serving Christ? What about these Unholy acts makes one a Christian?
Now you people see why I mostly just go zlzlozoozlzzoozzo instead of reasoning with Christ-opposing Chruchians.
The sad thing is they destroyed the Glory of Christ and Desouled the Church all for a little bernankified nookiezizlzzizizzlozlzozozo.
Above donalgraeme writes, “Since GBFM loves to talk about the law of Moses, lets discuss it briefly.”
This is a remarkable and telling comment from a Churchian, who thinks that Moses is irrelevant to Christianity.
I pointed this out by showing how Jesus also loved to “talk about the law of Moses,” and was threatened with being banned and censored.
Our Lord Jesus Christ Honored The Law of Moses, which donalgraeme detesteth and scoffs at, considering only worthy of “brief discussion,” and only because GBFM brought it up. Well, long before da GBFM, our Lord Jesus Christ also brought it up–in these translations Jesus cites THE LAW OF MOSES directly:
Matthew 5:17 (CEV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
THE LAW OF MOSES
17 Don’t suppose that I came to do away with the Law and the Prophets. I did not come to do away with them, but to give them their full meaning.
Matthew 5:17 (ERV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus and the Old Testament Writings
17 “Don’t think that I have come to destroy THE LAW OF MOSES or the teaching of the prophets. I have come not to destroy their teachings but to give full meaning to them.
Matthew 5:17 (GW) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Fulfills the Old Testament Scriptures
17 “Don’t ever think that I came to set aside MOSES’ Teachings or the Prophets. I didn’t come to set them aside but to make them come true.
Matthew 5:17 (GNT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Teaching about the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to do away with THE LAW OF MOSES and the teachings of the prophets. I have not come to do away with them, but to make their teachings come true.
Matthew 5:17 (TLB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Don’t misunderstand why I have come—it isn’t to cancel THE LAWS OF MOSES and the warnings of the prophets. No, I came to fulfill them and to make them all come true.
Matthew 5:17 (NOG) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Fulfills the Old Testament Scriptures
17 “Don’t ever think that I came to set aside MOSES’ Teachings or the Prophets. I didn’t come to set them aside but to make them come true.
Matthew 5:17 (NCV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Importance of the Law
17 “Don’t think that I have come to destroy THE LAW OF MOSES or the teaching of the prophets. I have not come to destroy them but to bring about what they said.
Matthew 5:17 (NLV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Teaches about the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to do away with THE LAW OF MOSES or the writings of the early preachers. I have not come to do away with them but to complete them.
Matthew 5:17 (NLT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Teaching about the Law
17 “Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish THE LAW OF MOSES or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.
Dear donalgraeme,
Go ahead and delete this. I am copying it and taking a screenshot of it, so that the world can know that you are A) bearing false witness against Jesus and Christianity and B) Censoring and deleting Jesus’s own words so that you can replace true Christinaity with your gamey version which denies the LAW OF MOSES which JESUS CAME TO FULFILL.
donalgraeme writes,
“If you are not willing to engage in a substantive debate over the merits of your post, or of mine, then I will delete your further comments.”
Nice ad hominem attack. Typical Churchian reaction to actually having to read the glorious words of OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST who exalts THE LAW OF MOSES but not your failed, decrepit CHURCHIAN GAME.
Go ahead, make my day. The Pharisees also censored, banned, and crucified Christ. Par for the Churchian course.
But the thing is, the Lord Jesus Christ will endure, no matter how many times you banish and condemn those who quote and Honor Him.
The world will little note nor long remember your violent transgressions against the spirit of Christmas, but it will yet celebrate JESUS and THE LAW OF MOSES for millenia to come.
Just because you, Dalrock, and Vox failed to honor JESUS by exalting the LAW OF MOSES, and thusly allowed GAME/TINGLELZOZOZOZ to rule your CHURCHIAN CHURCHES, don’t try to crucify Christ now and resurrect Him in your own Gamey image as a slave to tingzlzlzozlzizuzlzlzoz.
mdavid writes, ” Btw, could you please trim or limit GBFM’s comments so they don’t take up the whole thread? It’s hard to read others with all that copy/paste.”
There you have it folks. When one quotes the Lord Jesus Christ on a “Christian” blog, the Churchians rush to ban and censor them, and accuse them of blaspheming because they are quoting the Lord Jesus Christ.
Game on, worshippers of tinzgzlzlzozo and h8rs of the Word of Jesus Christ.
Donal Graeme bares false witness against da GBFM, libeling and slandering da GBFM.
Donal Graeme, “There is more, of course, but rather than simply quote the profane and often all but unreadable language of GBFM, I will translate some of his major arguments. ”
Firstoff, my language is entirely readable by tens of thousands who love da GBFM. Your inability to bask in the Glory and Love of God is not their problem.
Then, you accuse da GBFM of being profane.
All that I am doing is quoting the “profanity” of Game, as defined by the “Great Heartiste.”
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon/
You will find da GBFM simply quoting the words there, and inserting them into the Sermon on the Mount, which Dalrock and Vox commandeth that we must do.
When it comes to GAME, the Great Heartiste is far and above far, far greater than all other gamey bloggers. The readership and respect of the Great Heartiste makes Vox/Dalrock look like fledging altar boys before the Pope of Game.
But one thing that the Great Heartiste does not do is conflate GAME with CHRISSTIANITY, as your idols DALROCK AND VOX DO.
For this reason, and others, HEARTISTE is a greater Christian, and has a better understanding of Christianity then you and your idols Dalrock and Vox.
Feel free to apologize for falsely castigating and impugning da GBFM and bearing false witness against Jesus and Moses, while libeling Christianity. For Jesus asks that we forgive those who repent, and shy away from sinning again in the future.
Is Donal Graeme a Moses-hater, Christ-hater, or both
Donal writes, “Since GBFM loves to talk about the law of Moses, let’s discuss it briefly. The law of Moses set up an impressive amount of social and legal controls over women. Women were in most cases under the authority of their father or husband, they had limited legal standing outside of the men in their family. A woman who committed adultery was stoned to death, and a woman who fornicated but pretended to be a virgin, likewise. In short, women were soundly controlled by general society, and prevented from acting up their primal instincts.”
HEY DONAL! JESUS CAME TO FULFILL THE LAW OF MOSES! NOT ONLY DOES GBFM TALK ABOUT THE LAW OF MOSES, BUT SO DOES JESUS! DO YOU THINK JESUS IS BAD AND WRONG BECAUSE OF THIS?
HAVE YOU EVER READ THE BIBLE?
http://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Matthew%205%3A17
Matthew 5:17 (KJ21) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Think not that I am come to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (ASV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Think not that I came to destroy the law or the prophets: I came not to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (AMP) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Do not think that I have come to do away with or undo the Law or the Prophets; I have come not to do away with or undo but to complete and fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (CEB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus and the Law
17 “Don’t even begin to think that I have come to do away with the Law and the Prophets. I haven’t come to do away with them but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (CJB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Don’t think that I have come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets. I have come not to abolish but to complete.
Matthew 5:17 (CEV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law of Moses
17 Don’t suppose that I came to do away with the Law and the Prophets. I did not come to do away with them, but to give them their full meaning.
Matthew 5:17 (DARBY) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Think not that I am come to make void the law or the prophets; I am not come to make void, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (DRA) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Do not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (ERV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus and the Old Testament Writings
17 “Don’t think that I have come to destroy the Law of Moses or the teaching of the prophets. I have come not to destroy their teachings but to give full meaning to them.
Matthew 5:17 (ESV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Christ Came to Fulfill the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (ESVUK) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Christ Came to Fulfil the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfil them.
Matthew 5:17 (EXB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Importance of the Law and the Prophets
17 “Don’t think that I have come to ·destroy [abolish; do away with] ·the law of Moses or the teaching of the prophets [L the Law and the Prophets; C referring to the OT]. I have not come to destroy them but to ·bring about what they said [fulfill/complete them].
Matthew 5:17 (GNV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the Law, or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy them, but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (GW) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Fulfills the Old Testament Scriptures
17 “Don’t ever think that I came to set aside Moses’ Teachings or the Prophets. I didn’t come to set them aside but to make them come true.
Matthew 5:17 (GNT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Teaching about the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to do away with the Law of Moses and the teachings of the prophets. I have not come to do away with them, but to make their teachings come true.
Matthew 5:17 (HCSB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Christ Fulfills the Law
17 “Don’t assume that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17-20 (PHILLIPS) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Christ’s authority surpasses that of the Law
17-20 “You must not think I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to complete them. Indeed, I assure you that, while Heaven and earth last, the Law will not lose a single dot or comma until its purpose is complete. This means that whoever now relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men to do the same will himself be called least in Heaven. But whoever teaches and practises them will be called great in the kingdom of Heaven. For I tell you that your goodness must be a far better thing then the goodness of the scribes and Pharisees before you can set foot in the kingdom of Heaven at all!
Matthew 5:17 (JUB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 ¶ Think not that I am come to undo the law or the prophets; I am not come to undo, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (KJV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (AKJV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (LEB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Sermon on the Mount: The Law and the Prophets Fulfilled
17 “Do not think that I have come to destroy the law or the prophets. I have not come to destroy them but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (TLB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Don’t misunderstand why I have come—it isn’t to cancel the laws of Moses and the warnings of the prophets. No, I came to fulfill them and to make them all come true.
Matthew 5:17-18 (MSG) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Completing God’s Law
17-18 “Don’t suppose for a minute that I have come to demolish the Scriptures—either God’s Law or the Prophets. I’m not here to demolish but to complete. I am going to put it all together, pull it all together in a vast panorama. God’s Law is more real and lasting than the stars in the sky and the ground at your feet. Long after stars burn out and earth wears out, God’s Law will be alive and working.
Matthew 5:17 (NOG) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Fulfills the Old Testament Scriptures
17 “Don’t ever think that I came to set aside Moses’ Teachings or the Prophets. I didn’t come to set them aside but to make them come true.
Matthew 5:17 (NASB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (NCV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Importance of the Law
17 “Don’t think that I have come to destroy the law of Moses or the teaching of the prophets. I have not come to destroy them but to bring about what they said.
Matthew 5:17 (NET) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Fulfillment of the Law and Prophets
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have not come to abolish these things but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (NIRV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Gives Full Meaning to the Law
17 “Do not think I have come to get rid of what is written in the Law or in the Prophets. I have not come to do that. Instead, I have come to give full meaning to what is written.
Matthew 5:17 (NIV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Fulfillment of the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (NIVUK) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The fulfilment of the law
17 ‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfil them.
Matthew 5:17 (NKJV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Christ Fulfills the Law
17 “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (NLV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Jesus Teaches about the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to do away with the Law of Moses or the writings of the early preachers. I have not come to do away with them but to complete them.
Matthew 5:17 (NLT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
Teaching about the Law
17 “Don’t misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.
Matthew 5:17 (NRSV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (NRSVA) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 ‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (NRSVACE) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 ‘Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 (NRSVCE) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill.
Mattityahu 5:17 (OJB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Do not think that I came to abolish the Torah or the Neviim. I did not come to abolish but to complete.
Matthew 5:17 (RSV) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 “Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them.
Matthew 5:17 (RSVCE) | In Context | Whole Chapter
The Law and the Prophets
17 “Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them.
Matthew 5:17 (VOICE) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Do not think that I have come to overturn or do away with the law or the words of our prophets. To the contrary: I have not come to overturn them but to fulfill them.
Matthew 5:17 (WEB) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 “Don’t think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets. I didn’t come to destroy, but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (WE) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 `Do not think that I have come to take away the law and the writings of the prophets. No, I have not come to take them away. But I have come to do what they say must be done.
Matthew 5:17 (WYC) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 Do not ye deem, that I came to undo the law, or the prophets; I came not to undo the law, but to fulfill.
Matthew 5:17 (YLT) | In Context | Whole Chapter
17 `Do not suppose that I came to throw down the law or the prophets — I did not come to throw down, but to fulfill;
http://donalgraeme.wordpress.com/2013/12/28/thoughts-on-marriage-and-game/
LikeLike
Are there any provisions in Mosaic Law for proseltysing and sending missionaries to convert Gentiles? If not, it would appear either that Paul didn’t get that memo from “Matthew” or that Jesus’ disclaimer is rather empty.
Also, regarding “Churchianity”, were the priests in the 16th Century and later who sanctified the marriages of Spaniards to Indios, creating nearly wholesale the Mestizo problem that exists in North America today
“Churchian” or Christian and if the former, kindly cite from the text explicitly prohibiting such marriages (Revised Standard Version or any other single translation will do). Depending on your answer, either there is nothing inconsistent to Christianity in miscegenation (sufficient reason alone to reject that religion in favour of one that explicitly rejects miscegenation) or you are a member not of a religion but rather of a marginalised cult.
LikeLike
Start with the book of Jonah, you cultural illiterate. Then we can talk about the theme of lumen gentium throughout the Old Testament.
LikeLike
Anything pro-white in that mess of a book?
LikeLike
That mess of a book made whites white.
LikeLike
Christianity as it’s currently practiced in the real world is too anti-white.
At this point any normal white person has to grudgingly conclude- “I didn’t leave the Christian faith; the Christian faith left me.”
So go tell the priests and ministers and cardinals to be less anti-white. After you and others like you have succeeded in rescuing Christianity from its inevitable brown gutter, I’ll consider joining. But as a sheepdog, not a sheep.
LikeLike
Anti-whiteness is hardly a new thing for Christianity, viz, 16th Century South and Central America Mestizos from church-sanctified marriages.
LikeLike
You’ll join as the sheepdog for one of our daughters. Or as a mentor for one of our sons.
LikeLike
Everything is “anti-white” to the single-issue monomaniac, nothing passes the lily purity test.
[CH: The problem for this contra-contrarian stance is that, in fact, so much malignancy of late can indeed be readily explained by framing the evil in terms of anti-white male hatred.]
The church of Christ is universal or catholic. That means it accommodates every soul. Each man stands equal before God.
Now, since you grew up thinking this is the Marxist presumption, you have no understanding of its righteous origin in ancient history. So there is little use trying to separate the wheat from the tares in you, since you do not possess the requisite knowledge to make the separation. It is the secular attempt to play God that turns these warped distortions of Christianity, like leftist-inspire feminism, into their opposite.
Once you purge yourself of these lefty influences that you don’t even know you have, then you will be able to see that equality before God has little to nothing to do with equality before man or equality on earth.
The ability to discern and discriminate is the basis for all judgment. The church, much less Christ himself, had nothing to do with the nihilistic attempt to eliminate discrimination. “His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the granary, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire” (Matt 3:12).
Or, “Do you think that I have come to give peace on earth? No, I tell you, but rather division” (Luke 12:51).
Those who desire namby-pamby peace on earth rather than confrontation and separation are the enemies of the peace of God. The multikulti tableaus of human crayola diversity which we worship are inimical to God’s purpose for man. They are the opposite of Christ’s challenge against nihilism, against the nothingness which stupefies and anesthetizes, the I’d-Like-To-Teach-The-World-To-Sing, kumbaya, Imagine-All-The-People haters of mankind. Or Nietzsche’s Last Man, who say they have discovered happiness, who blink, who retreat to that which is warm and soft and healthful.
This hypnosis of the devil carries away our ability to distinguish, our ability to discern anything, our ability to discriminate. Now your response is to rage against that centuries-long bamboozle, to restore the white man to everything he was before the project of his dismantlement began. This is foolish, it underestimates how deep the rot is, it overestimates how useful replacing judgment itself with racial classification will be. That’s mere reaction, an imitation of what the left has done, which replaced judgment with racial blindness.
Rather, the mission is to restore discrimination or diacresis, the very essence and foundation of wisdom itself. That doesn’t happen by pretending white defines virtue and black defines sin. You are a counterproductive, perhaps even sabotaging “useful idiot” of the left if you think that’s a solution to anything. You are using their terms and methodology and thinking yourself rebellious.
You cannot unfuck centuries of tangled cord in a single motion. This ball of Gordian Knots will swallow up Alexander’s sword. No, you must begin the slow process of unraveling, a task that will begin with our generation and only be completely unwound well after our death. But to begin such a salvific project is the noblest thing we can do with our short lives.
Matt
LikeLike
No, that is the simpleton’s frame.
[CH: Hatred needs no complex justification.]
“Read[y]” explanation will do in a pinch, but it’s not a sturdy enough justification to sustain a movement beyond its initial energetic burst of catharsis.
[If tribalism aka ethnocentrism is an ancient primal human impulse, then it can sustain itself for as long as the tribes exist, and the laundry list of rationalizations for it will grow in number and sophistry in lockstep, not to enable the hatred, but to make it seem something other than what it is.]
The “malignancy of late” can be better explained “by framing the evil in terms of” an aggressive persecution against discrimination itself. Hatred of wisdom and judgment in themselves becomes confused with hatred of whites because whites are the clearest champions of wisdom and judgment — and therefore its most visible representatives.
If it were about mere race (or sex), they would praise Uncle Toms (and Sarah Palins) rather than, absurdly, declaring them non-black (or not a woman!) with a straight face.
But the enemy goes even more fiercely after wise black outliers like Sowell and Thomas and Steele because they embody the contradiction that exposes the true object of the left’s hatred: not white people, but virtue itself, of which whites are merely the best exemplars.
It is a satanic, nihilistic hatred of the good, the wise, the strong, and the beautiful per se. Ressentiment personified versus virtue personified.
Dig?
Matt
LikeLike
Excellent insight.
I want to hear a mainstream commentator like Rush articulate and frame anti-White animus in these terms, It’d force the concession that inequality is the truth.
LikeLike
The cathedral is overwhelmingly concentrating its firepower in white countries against white people.
LikeLike
200000000 Mestizos, brought into existence through Church-sanctioned marriages in the 16th Century disagree.
LikeLike
2,000 generations before me who chose to be pro-white made me white, not some stories in a book.
LikeLike
Pre-Christian Roman, Greeks and Vikings were black O.o ?
LikeLike
You may take that as a “no”.
LikeLike
You have zero discernment in you. You’re an ideologue cut from the same cloth with which the left creates its puppets.
I do not associate myself with your kind because you are destined to flame-out in short order, clutching tightly to your pearls of wisdom which you haven’t the ability to discern as genuine or ersatz.
Think, white man. You give people of pallor a bad name. Your behavior and slipshod investigating method is proof against the very thesis you proffer, which assumes whites are a people of sophistication and intelligence.
Discrimination is wisdom, and the deepest you can discriminate is by first impression, by what’s visible. No wonder you want to limit all discriminatory legitimacy to the crudest possible criterion, race. Just like the left insists.
LikeLike
Some things are simple, Matt. You’re either pro-white or you’re pro white genocide. Which are you?
LikeLike
Only Ben Klassen’s Christian Identity version
LikeLike
You don’t have to call my name fifty times in a post to get my attention, sweetheart.
LikeLike
As a fellow Christard I’d think you and GBFM would get along like peas and carrots, but apparently, there is only room for a single Holy Roller in these here parts…
LikeLike
Shout out to Vernard Eller. Caravans over commissaries.
LikeLike
Your antecedent to “I’d” implies that you are the “Christard.” It should read: As a fellow Christard you and GBFM should get along …
Write for clarity, retard. You’re obviously as familiar with this subject as the rest of the mouth-breathers who get an orgasm from denouncing Christ anonymously online.
Regarding which of us is more tardly, let the evidence speak for itself. I am confident in my power of demonstration, whereas you, who like a mongoloid believes an epithet can substitute for a well-rendered philosophy, can only jeer from outside the arena like some hayseed in the back row of Wrestlemania XXIX.
My differences with the gibberish oracle have nothing to do with Christianity and therefore cannot be transcended by our (presumably) mutual faith. As I just discussed above in your case, he cannot write clearly enough for me to understand whether we do indeed share faith or philosophy or strategy. There is a whole lot of nothing behind his interminable stream of letter vomit.
Worse than his ideological confusion is his persona, which cannot participate in a fruitful exchange with his critics. Worst of all is the effusive praise brought on by our host’s indulgence (and, alas, promotion), which encourages his published garbage to keep on flowing unimpeded, to the cheers of word-salad masochists. C’est la internet.
Matt
LikeLike
Snake in the grass ‘beta-bait and switch,’ though hilarious in theory, is a poor strategy when you examine the investment-payoff curve. It’s likely you’ll
1) Only attract post-wall leavings and/or single mothers
2) Take a full month to secure PIV, burning an unnecessary amount of money along the way
3) Kill tingles in most women worth defiling (the exception being the elusive ‘very religious nymph virgins’ – for whom I would actually attempt this strategy).
LikeLike
The strategy is to offer goodies, not give goodies … then reneg, post-bang. Diabolical, and probably effective in the short run.
LikeLike
Ah, ok. Well that’s better (and more challenging to pull off) but points 1) and 3) are still applicable.
LikeLike
Agreed.
I’d say the entire strategy is ill-advised & immoral, but arguing from morality these days isn’t very effective. Post-collapse, the cause and effect relationship between immoral behavior and unpleasant consequences will be much more clear.
Do as ye will.
LikeLike
Do you have to offer goodies or just describe yourself as having goodies to offer? You don’t have to be completely accurate about your income, if you’re a male nurse you can say you’re a doctor, etc. She’s not entitled to absolute honesty in these things — you’re not lying about having STD’s she could get or anything like that. She’s not materialistic, remember? Heh.
Immoral? I’d say not excessively moral but not immoral either, gray area “all’s fair in love and war” territory. I doubt you would find many women to disagree, unless of course they are the one you went all the way with under such false pretenses.
LikeLike
Hell, whether your chosen means is an outright lie or simply encouraging her to draw a convenient conclusion, the end is the same: getting into her pants. Machiavelli would approve.
Jesus … not so much, methinks.
LikeLike
A capital sigma or summation sign, with a middle finger? Unusual …
What did Jesus say (not what did Paul interpret btw) that relates to this? Do unto others I guess … but what woman is completely honest? And doesn’t cover blemishes (those are important to men) with makeup etc.
If you’re looking for the explicit-consent-at-each-step model, I don’t think it works and can even get a woman angry. If you’re looking for the level of indirection that the woman will forgive afterwards, well (1) you might be surprised how much she’ll forgive when her oxytocin kicks in.
Or please clarify, what is OK and what is not in your book?
As for myself, I think that there are some things you don’t ask. And when I am asked those things, rather than embarrass myself by looking awkward, I try to give whatever answer I want or what they want to hear. It’s done smoothly, but it’s a way of following what I see as the proper rules of the game and not giving an advantage when someone else tries to cheat.
I would not be OK with lying about an STD risk that a woman would have by having sex with you. I am very uncomfortable with offering commitment dishonestly to a girl who is trying to stay chaste.
I’ve never actually fudged my income, I’ve never looked as flashy as my income let alone flashier, but come to think of it, I wish I had tried this in my days of spreading wild oats. If it’s the way of getting a player chick to see you as cool enough, well I’ve known enough cool cats who lie smoothly about all sorts of things.
LikeLike
Thinking a moment … Jesus did say “let your no be no and your yes be yes” and this is fine advice. Just be prepared for the fact that women won’t give you credit for honesty because they are unable to identify it.
LikeLike
I thought women under 24 were looking more for comfort, 25 and up looking for real masculinity. So it might work on girls under 24.
LikeLike
You have it backwards. Younger women chase alpha fux. Older women chase beta bux.
LikeLike
I’m not talking about the Wall at 30 or so. This is an earlier transition, as described by women themselves on some sort of feminist chat “how have your dating preferences changed as you have gotten older?”
It’s not a good idea to take dating ADVICE from women, but it’s good to gather DATA from them and do your own analysis.
LikeLike
Wholeheartedly agree.
LikeLike
Whatever helps you sleep at night — I’m 99.9% sure that 1-3 are wrong. It will work on most any girl, and while it probably will take a little longer to secure the bang, the only additional resource investment is just time, and it doesn’t kill them, just builds them up slower.
But hey, try it for yourself and see if you can smash a hot chick in this way.
LikeLike
How do you avoid getting friendzoned? Are you hypothesizing that the friendzone is not to be feared and can be escaped by alpha behavior just as if you were meeting her for the first time?
If so, I’ve suspected as much, and I’ve never found congruency to be much of an issue either. Whatever I project, they buy it.
The issue with friendzone (i.e. inferior position friendzone, where she thinks she is turning you down for sex rather than vice-versa) is really that you did something wrong to end up there, and presumably you can’t change on a dime. If you have the other personality at your command too, yeah I don’t see why not.
LikeLike
You avoid being friendzoned by DHV’ing hard when you meet up with her. This whole thing is really just a way to isolate her. At the beginning your beta-pleas are “legit” but later on they’re just another DHV for passion/ability to emote.
LikeLike
In regards to Scray’s comment, the only way you get pussy by acting beta is if you’re really good looking or dating girls with low SMV. I’m not sure how that got past the editor’s here at Le Chateau. Wouldn’t work for top tier girls.
LikeLike
Yeah… the only betas who do well with hot girls (at least in the short term) are tall and good-looking.
LikeLike
It depends on whether the girl was raised by an alpha father. Women brought up right, and in possession of the right resources (above average looks), have the power to turn betas into alphas. The hottest downmarket whores are depleted quickly on the meat market.
LikeLike
Women brought up right, and in possession of the right resources (above average looks), have the power to turn betas into alphas.
Call me a cynic, but I can’t imagine that happens in the real world, barring an arranged marriage.
LikeLike
> “Wouldn’t work for top tier girls.”
I dunno – I’ve known a lot of guys over the years who used what we now call “beta orbiter” game to eventually score a once-in-a-lifetime mercy fuck from a top tier chick.
The hilarious thing, though, is to try to imagine any of them even dreaming of doing what Scray is now proposing.
LikeLike
It’s cool, I can break it down. Beta guys don’t get pussy, but they do get a lot of face time with women = fact. Women who are hotter will fucking weed you out extremely fast, and doubly so in the context of cold approach. When you are pretty far out of your looks league….face time with a girl is your best friend. But you need to isolate her to get a fair shake. So ya, you play right into that initial ‘this is a guy who will buy me some drinks and I can use him for awhile and not give him much, if any, sex. why not go on a date or something.’
Fine — who gives a shit.
On the date, now that she’s alone without a) her friends to judge her b) distracting club bullshit and c) in an environment where (hopefully) you have high value, you can start pouring in the alpha. Bit by bit. Still pay for her drink or whatever. Give lip service to some beta shit, but increasingly sub in the alpha. Now she should start to think that this is great — you’re a guy who’s “kind of cute” or somewhat attractive, who also will be there with her. Suddenly, maybe you’re not so bad.
Then the next time, you go more alpha — still pay lip service to beta shit — and then you’ll get the value/attraction you need to fuck her fairly soon.
Maybe as a theory this will fail, but it’s worked pretty great this one time I’ve done it (fell into it, really).
Yareally is right that this is like………snorting cocaine. It’s a short-term thing that really won’t help develop your inner game from where it is currently. So ya, it’s bad for you…but ya, I’m pretty sure it would work if I did it again. It also matches up with evo-psych.
The social circle stuff would just be a bonus.
It’s more subtle than just ‘act beta.’
LikeLike
Sounds totally fine to me, unobjectionable. Of course you act differently with people you just met than those you have gotten to know better. And that’s likely how the girl will see it, or you can just frame it that way if she ever questions the congruency.
In life you are not actually any of the personalities you project. You are allowed to choose them and change them. “Be yourself” — which self?
What’s YaReally’s issue with it — that you can’t keep comfort with this girl while being alpha on first meeting? Maybe that will come with experience, but that experience will come because of the face time YOU get with hot girls this way.
LikeLike
Let me add, women have said that alpha aggressive behavior seems more “genuine” to them, and beta nice-guy behavior seems contrived. They don’t trust the beta behavior. So you can frame it that as you got to know her better, your guard came down.
If you’re on the “fuckable” list when you say that, she should be dripping right about then.
LikeLike
Well the main issue with it is that I’m taking a shortcut. Truly hot girls — 8+ — are difficult to score if you aren’t at least a male 8. So, developing an internal frame strong enough to win that caliber of chick — to the point of DHV’ing within 5 minutes in a setting unfavorable to you (think the clubs that Ya talks about — turbo hotties everywhere and even more alphas, rich dudes, really good looking dudes) is fucking daffy. Like, it’d be a very long time for me.
This is kind of a hack. The problem is that while you get the bang….just thinking about it…you really don’t get much. The reason why it’s easy to do the aboutface and be ‘alpha’ is the same reason it’s easy for the landwhale to pre-emptively no-contact the male 6 who pumps and dumps her — fear.
What the fuck am I going to do with this girl?
I barely can even manage the relationship with the 7. Like, with the 8….I think to myself ‘ya got to let her go, my life isn’t developed enough I’m not developed enough….sooner or later she’ll sniff it out anyway.’ The only problem is that, contextually, withdrawing contact makes her want me more. So it’s just messy.
It’s kinda like that comment from the Joker:
“You know what I am? I’m a dog chasing cars. I wouldn’t know what to do with one if I caught it! You know, I just… *do* things.”
LikeLike
Well hell, on one hand we’re remarking that hot chicks go for losers. On the other hand, you’re saying you’re going to lose the chick because you’re too much like a loser?
We already know that whatever the shape of your personal life, that will be acceptable to some chicks. To others it may not be — possibly those with better self esteem, better relationships with their fathers, higher IQ, etc. So for right now suppose you can either get the relatively fucked up hot chicks or none at all. I know which I would choose, at least for a while. 🙂
There’s an important moment in learning to ride a bicycle, at which you get on it before you really know how to ride it.
As to what you do with such a chick once you’ve “got” her — let nature take its course and we’re always happy to give nature some help over here. The negative feelings and fears at this point don’t really mean anything.
LikeLike
Losers like, externally losers = no job, etc. I mean loser as in just…my internal frame isn’t ready to handle the territory of dating an 8. Dealing with her friends, her lifestyle, etc. Like, there are a million situations where my inexperience and “greeness” will show through.
It’s not a big deal, I can acknowledge all of this shit. I’m in a transitory period and it’s a tough plateau.
LikeLike
Scray…
That’s fucked up man. 8 is just a 6 with better genes and diet. Her social circle ain’t difficult to navigate. It’s actually fun.
The guy with money is a ladder in business. The chick with Double D’s is the default joke butt.
The trouble is you’re buying into their frame. Or at least presuming that you will, which indicates that you already do buy into their frame.
Her hotness doesn’t mean shit if you don’t pedestalize it. Nor does her friends’ cup sizes, or the AMOG’s bank balance. Your frame is everything.
I sense a lack of vision for your own life. That, or a substantial lack of ruthless action to realize that vision on your part.
Your problem isn’t lack of looks/fame/wealth. It’s lack of ambitious action.
RP
LikeLike
“What’s YaReally’s issue with it”
His internals when he first proposed it were shit. “I’m gonna promise her commitment then fuck her over and lie to her friends that she’s a crazy bitch and make them fight hahaha revenge on women!!!!!”
The way he’s described it here, I have no problems with.
There are other issues that will come up tho:
1) he won’t keep her because he hasn’t earned her internally and if she’s hot she’ll sniff that out. As a hot girl she’s designed to sniff out guys who can’t handle her long term. It’s like skipping to the final boss in a fighting game without knowing all the moves. Ya you for to the boss and you’ll win a few matches but you will probably get smoked eventually.
2) he will get one-itis from spending so much time with her, esp if they aren’t fucking right away. That’s just how humans work. The longer it takes to bang her the more attached he’ll get. He’ll stop going out and obsess over her and then convince himself she’s better than other girls since his entire plan is based on “I can’t treat her like other girls, she’s DIFFERENT you guise”. This is really just mild one-itis combined with a lack of entitlement.
3) who’s been playing the frame longer? The hot girl juggling beta orbiters and sucking resources out of them without putting out since she grew tits at 14 and has had a thousand orbiters chase her, or the guy who’s been alpha for about a year and is actively sabotaging that on purpose at the start of the relationship so he’s basically starting climbing the hill from a hole instead of level ground. Realistically who’s likely to fall I to who’s frame and get their way?
4) “Fake it till you make it” works for beta behavior as well as alpha behavior.
LikeLike
Yes you’ve got some fair points …
(1) yes he may lose, but that’s the point of avoiding oneitis and outcome dependence.
(2) if the girl is good enough that you get oneitis, then at least you’re having fun. And it can be an important step in development of inner game — to make her a plate even though most guys would die for her. You can’t take that step until you actually face the situation.
(3) see (1)
(4) sure, but you’ve got to have several personalities in your toolkit. Push-pull requires a push personality and a pull personality, for example.
LikeLike
1) the point is he’ll lose without learning anything. Just like poor people winning the lottery end up poor again because they didn’t magically gain financial management skills since they cheated the system.
2) the point is he won’t make her a plate. No one makes their one-itis a place. It’s not called plate-itis or multi-itis.
3) see 1. The experience he’ll get won’t be solidifying his own frame as a man, it’ll be experience playing inside her frame. If he manages not to get one-itis he could avoid it, but he’s already GOT mild one-itis, it’s just clearly disguised so he doesn’t recognize it. It’s like saying an alcoholic will be able to drink 2 drinks then stop while spending the rest of the night in a bar with free alcohol. Sure, it’s possible, but it’s pretty unlikely when he’s purposely stacking the deck against it.
4) it sounds like you might be more concerned with his lay count than his personal development. If anything he should GFTOW and THEN execute this plan on her, because she won’t seem as special.
Aaaand now I’m off to the bar. Happy Saturday all
LikeLike
I’m a little fuzzy on the personal development aspect of this as it relates to non-girl matters. As someone said here, our target is girls. One gains battle experience by being in battle. I am not really sure what these lessons are that you want him to learn, that he won’t learn this way.
Not disagreeing with you, because I am not even sure what you are saying. Hers’s what I understand.
Yes I can see some one-itis tendency in his comments. I think it’s a lack of confidence or skill, combined with a touch of codependency. This is normal, at least i had it, when I was in a lower learning stage. One clings if one cannot fly free. And the cure for it that I know of is success, followed by realizing that the success allows you to go back and change some old habits. For me anyway, it works a lot better if there are successful experiences along the way for motivation.
LikeLike
Personal development is about not losing frame with ten 10’s in tow. Would you shit your pants if you were talking to a group/class of fifty 10’s? Would you shit your pants if they all started making fun of you right in front of you?
How’d you handle that?
Think Hefner. That’s the pinnacle. Probably. Or Charlie Sheen.
Those men never lose frame no matter who they talk to.
That’s what all this is all about.
Pussy is a by-product.
RP
LikeLike
You can’t cheat the game. It’s just lying to yourself. Ultimately you lose. Embracing that truth is the penultimate DHV.
LikeLike
I disagree. You -can- cheat the game very effectively, if your goal is to score casual sex from hot girls. You can’t cheat developing further as a man.
LikeLike
“You -can- cheat the game very effectively, if your goal is to score casual sex from hot girls. You can’t cheat developing further as a man.”
Yep. If your goal is just getting sex from hot chicks, it’s a helluva lot faster/easier to just buy hookers. A lot of the guys doing that don’t see anything wrong with it because they don’t care about the self-development side of pickup.
The early pickup community (and a lot of pickup communities still) was based around lay counts and batting averages and shit, and it created a lot of guys with great externals and weak internals. Ideally I’d like to see new guys build a strong internal foundation from the start because it’s going to be a faster route to long-term success even if the rewards aren’t as instantly gratifying as just paying a hooker or telling women you’re a doctor who wants to marry them and take them to Paris.
LikeLike
That’s an interesting theory… playing the beta dope with a girl far above you in looks. I’m a pretty ugly guy myself, I can see this working. How long do you have to play the beta card for… hours… days? I suspect you do something like offer a dinner at a good restaurant? I need to work on being nicer to girls – if you have any more tips they’re appreciated.
LikeLike
“with a girl far above you in looks.”
This is sort of the crux of the issue. He’s still subscribing to society’s value system because he hasn’t had enough reference experience to break out of it. Because he’s trapped in a frame where he thinks she’s “above” him because she has nice tits, he’s not going to have the internals to keep her or possibly even get the bang.
As long as he continues to think “I know you say looks don’t matter buuuuuuut…” he’s not in the right mindset to get/keep the really hot girls.
This is actually the problem the PUA community had early on, Tyler talks about it at the start of the Blueprint. The early PUA stuff was based on “she’s up here and I’m down here so I have to raise myself up or bring her down so she views me as equal/superior” instead of the current superior inner game mentalities of “there’s no reason I’m not enough” and “I have higher value just because I have a penis.”
LikeLike
Agree 100%. More if possible.
Think of it this way. Some guys say they imagine a girl with a pig face or something to make her less intimidating. I say, imagine her vulvar area. Now you’ve probably seen her particular one, but you’ve seen plenty of others, and the internet is full of them. Analyzing this, I have been unable to find a correlation between the girl’s face and body, and the look of her cunt. Girls with beautiful skin and clear faces and great shapes will have sort of twisted looking cunts, and acne’s fat girls will have very nice conventional looking ones.
And since “game” is about communication with the pussy, bypassing the conscious mind, imagine that which you seek. And know that it seeks you too, it isn’t judging you on looks or your job or your bank account, it really just wants to get filled.
There’s nothing wrong if the girl’s outer appearance is pleasing on the eyes. But don’t get totally distracted by it.
LikeLike
“… you’ve probably NOT seen her particular one …”
LikeLike
> “Girls with beautiful skin and clear faces and great shapes will have sort of twisted looking cunts, and acne’s fat girls will have very nice conventional looking ones.”
Okay, frigging Hunter Thompson Out-of-the-Blue Surrealism-of-the-Week What-the-Fuck Award right there.
LOL’ed.
LikeLike
Social dynamics for nïggers. Now I understand why our visions will never intersect.
The slave mind survives on its wits, deceives, acts other than it is, plots how to sneak under defenses to steal resources, like those early mammals that survived on dinosaur eggs.
The master is naïve — not clever, maybe even dumb — but conquers with his presence. He doesn’t burrow under defenses, he plows through them.
Game at its best doesn’t encourage you to do anything anything! to get the pussy, with the ends justifying the means. It rather advises you imitate the master (alpha) until you become the master, within and without. The hangups on externals (“the only way you get pussy by acting beta is if you’re really good looking”) is an indication that the student is learning the wrong lesson. Mastery is a state of mind that rises above snap judgments which the alpha knows are superficial and easily manipulated to his advantage.
Game easily putrefies into male sluttiness — a truly debilitating obsession with hyperactive socializing (GOE OWT MOAR) — and PUA’s seem to have no understanding of this long-term danger, so focused are they on scoring in the moment.
The game rightly understood is supposed to be fun for the girl. Exhilarating, even. It is supposed to reconnect her with her nature, take her on an thrill ride. It’s not a findem fuckem and flee. It’s not an abuse! Game clears the space for her to be feminine in an anti-feminine shitworld.
Yes, game can also “shortcut” (Scray) the process for sneaky cowards, but that just adds one more slut to our raging cultural slutfire. And that habitual behavior makes the man worse, too. It brings out the slave mentality, it makes him tacky, devoid of sophistication and class and the expectations that come with the la dolce vita.
Matt
LikeLike
Temptation is what it is, my ponitficatious dudebro. Sometimes we yield, sometimes we don’t. Relax.
LikeLike
“The slave mind survives on its wits, deceives, acts other than it is, plots how to sneak under defenses to steal resources”
And calling on each one of those indebted to his master, he said to the first ‘How much do you owe my master?’
LikeLike
The genius of GBFM is that he could either be praising or ridiculing the CH.
LikeLike
The ambiguity out of which tingles, and perhaps offspring, are birthed.
LikeLike
I have only praise for da EMINENT CH.
I am, however, ridiculing those who think otherwise, and they don’t even know it, which makes it even more lzolzolzozozozozozozlozozozer lzozoz.
Earl, when are you going to launch your blog?
LikeLike
I’m working up to it.
LikeLike
That will be one happy place, I’m sure.
LikeLike
And I don’t care what anybody else says…GBFM is the best commenter here.
LikeLike
Seconded.
LikeLike
Negative thousandthed.
LikeLike
Clarify.
LikeLike
Why can’t my friends be friends?????
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
GBFM’s phrase “taping the girl without her consent” do ring prescient in light of Snowden’s revelations.
LikeLike
More confirmation of what’s already known :
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2549872/Extroverts-heartbreakers-Research-suggests-married-confident-people-able-affairs-without-feeling-guilty.html
“It also found that they carry more ‘narcissistic’ and ‘psychopathic’ personality traits.”
The report in the journal Evolutionary Psychology concluded: ‘Extroversion may predispose a person to use both short-term mating and long-term mating, which may lead to infidelity and cuckoldry.’
Dr Holtzman added that while cheating increased the chances of transferring sexually transmitted diseases and may be morally reprehensible, it carried evolutionary advantages.
LikeLike
> “Dr Holtzman added that while cheating increased the chances of transferring sexually transmitted diseases and may be morally reprehensible, it carried evolutionary advantages.”
And evolutionary DIS-advantages, as well.
What might be an advantage in the short term can easily destroy an entire species in the long term.
And certainly destroy a civilization.
BTW, in case it isn’t abundantly obvious to anyone here, “Holtzman” is a YKW name.
So this is a pure, unadulterated, unabashed Frankfurt School propaganda and disinformation campaign that we’re talking about.
Hell, there’s even an “inkblot” test named after a Holtzman:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holtzman_Inkblot_Test
And you don’t get much more authentically Frankfurt School than inkblot tests.
PS: In another few years – within a decade or so – they’ll feel confident enough to drop the part about “and may be morally reprehensible”, and just tell you outright that you ought to be cheating, because all the Kool Kidz are doing it.
LikeLike
That second named trait is quite astounding to see in a mainstream publication like dailymail. Psychopathic (and they really mean Sociopathic) has a massive negative stigma so to just hand-wavingly associate it with extroverts is something I’ve never seen in MSM, despite the 100% truth of the statement.
LikeLike
The Pajamaboy thing reads like a road map of who I used to be in most respects. What’s interesting is realizing that I never felt like I couldn’t survive without her, I didn’t take it all that slow, and I’ve always been proud of who I am, and sort of disappointed that the world we live in doesn’t value things about me that are totally awesome (like the fact that I’m typing this from a household that runs 100% on Linux).
I find looking back on that phase of my life, I never truly meant any of that shit anyway. That’s why I question the Pajamaboys of this world. Do they REALLY feel that way? I never did. I was just raised to act that way, because it’s what I was supposed to do. Mom taught me that thing hanging between my legs made me a bad person, and Dad provided the perfect role model; his sex life consisted of getting Mom drunk, jumping on, and trying to ride the bull long enough to pop.
I wish I had discovered all of this stuff at least 10 years sooner, but better late than never. I like hating feminism, and pansies like Pajamaboy.
LikeLike
I had no idea what I was doing. I didn’t like the chicks enough to go full pajamaboy, and it didn’t seem to go for me like in the movies (there are some scenes that can be read as beta or alpha, depending on what you’re looking for) and I was told that was mainly because I didn’t look like a movie star.
So I sort of bumbled along, had a girlfriend that was OK at best for a while, couldn’t see marrying her, then sort of worked stuff out a bit from first principles.
I suspect the pajamaboy trap is for guys who are better looking than I am. It may seem to work for a while, whereas I got blown out of the water so fast it made my head spin. My few successes, and they came here and there, were from doing things totally different.
LikeLike
There’s some truth to that. You have to be attractive enough to get chicks in the first place in order to have a girl to pedestalize.
I was a nerd who simply didn’t bother to go after women at all until it was much too late. Apparently, I later learned, some of them thought I was cute but immature.
LikeLike
Whorefinder has but one commandment. Anyone care to guess?
LikeLike
Really Appreciating Pussy Everyday!!!
LikeLike
RAPE!
LikeLike
Flowers and expensive dinner?
LikeLike
Cuddle, share, listen so hard it hurts?
LikeLike
“It isn’t rape, it’s just a Friday night.”
LikeLike
Always be surprising.
LikeLike
No fat chicks.
LikeLike
It is better to be adventurous than cautious, because fortune is a woman, and if you wish to keep her under it is necessary to rape and ill-use her; and it is seen that she allows herself to be mastered by the adventurous with a clown mask rather than by those who go to work more coldly.
LikeLike
Tumult rape.
LikeLike
Because I may have cut that reference a bit thin, allow me to recommend that you all read Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livius.
LikeLike
Pithy! Must’ve got that from a greeting card.
LikeLike
“He said, she said” can backfire, though, especially if the “He” is a dude most women would automatically distrust.
Very key.
LikeLike
Gentlemen,I present you the ministers of defense of 4 northern european states: https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/t1/1551727_10200284757081429_458095353_n.jpg
Europeans can sleep without worries-Europe is in safe hands lol
LikeLike
Jokes aside, they don’t have much in the way of war over there, so they can get away with it. I’m more worried about the Muslims.
LikeLike
No better sign of the times than that photo, which looks like four menopausal HR reps waiting for a table at Denny’s. It’s not so much their sex as it is the indignity, the insouciance of it all.
Here’s another from the dawn of the Obongo era that I thought captured the zeitgeist well:
http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1730927,00.html
LikeLike
She must be one of the few pregnant women in Spain. Average fertility’s halved there in the last 40 years.
LikeLike
No worse than Hillary and the new DHS supervisor, and Ma Peeps Holder, et. al. The rot of the West is now from sea to shining sea.
LikeLike
Pfft. Real Denny’s: http://www.funny-city.com/photos/are-you-hungry.jpg
LikeLike
Their sex is kind of an issue, though. How many women do you know who are readily able and willing to contemplate the use of violence? Even in the military female population, the idea of protecting oneself through violent means is a bit beyond most of us.
LikeLike
A female minister of defense is a tell, though as a NAWALT Maggie Thatcher had balls enough to win the Falklands whereas her countrymen to the left have spent many a year pissing and moaning about this hateful fact.
LikeLike
Decadence in its finest
But the picture reminded of another one
It must have been for the beauty of the subjects
http://tinyurl.com/kkga9v2
LikeLike
I’m confused about “he said she said”. Is it that she denies that there was sex and you say there was, or she says she was forced into sex and you say she wasn’t?
In either case, what actually happened is not necessarily relevant if there’s no evidence of it.
LikeLike
I’d say that generally, you have to fuck the girl — or at least, I have. That’s the pre-selection trigger.
Really it’s just the difference between you fucking her friends with impunity or with a ton of it-may-not-be-worth-it-drama.
A more dark triad individual might even be able to build a willing harem out of all of them, wearing the guise of a guy ‘who’s just looking for the right girl to commit to….and doesn’t want to pressure anybody…’
don’t worry dudes, if it blows up in my face I will deploy these tactics with her friends. we’ll see how well it works out. If you aren’t taking risks — or doing -some- stupid shit — in the game, then wtf are you doing.
LikeLike
A more dark triad individual might even be able to build a willing harem out of all of them, wearing the guise of a guy ‘who’s just looking for the right girl to commit to….and doesn’t want to pressure anybody…’
I like. You can be dark-triad when you want to be. Own it!
LikeLike
It’s not *that* difficult to build a harem. It’s just work. You can be upfront and honest about it too. If you want a harem, you go out and get it and build it. No reason to lie. Lying = admitting that you can’t win through your own hard work and volition.
LikeLike
Be very, very careful if you choose to game the modern woman for casual sex.
LikeLike
“Beta Imitation Game” is my best play. I recommend it highly for carouselers, they never see it coming…
LikeLike
Do you have a roadmap/algorithm for you purportedly successful BI game? What are the promises of provision you perpetuate? (heh). I would like to know what ‘works’ when traversing the fine line between making promises of the future and turning her off.
LikeLike
http://www.npr.org/2014/02/01/269924913/finding-the-sum-of-true-love-on-the-88th-try
LikeLike
Try the classic tranny surprise?
LikeLike
Crying Game Game???
LikeLike
You’re right Preston, I should have been a little more specific. I’m speaking of the carouseler who’s now lookng for the Beta Provider. Beta Imitation Game works is an excellent tactic, but you have to scrutinize your target. Strictly pump-&-dump or an addition to your soft harem for a time because they eventually figure it out.
LikeLike
and that’s exactly the sort of non-chaste women I would have no compunction using it with.
LikeLike
God dammit! Scray that is my play book you fucking asshole now you put that shit on the interwebs. Every stiff cock wannabe is now going to use that. Fuck you for giving my mojo away.
LikeLike
Okay then the cat is out of the bag. Beta bait game. So my friend you achieved some success at your level. That means different things at different age brackets that I will not elaborate. This strategy is not for amateurs, aspy’s or any other failboat newbs.
Beta Bait Game Rules.
1. You have resources that your target craves
2. The best bait is not garish. Do not front run your bait.
3. Be coy about the bait
4. Dangle the bait in a non obvious manner
5. Be a sincere beta with the bait hidden in plain sight
6. The bait position along with beta supplication is the key
7. Do not delude yourself when bait is taken
8. Graceful exit. One could write a novel on this topic alone
I am somewhat miffed but not surprised our host brought this to the masses.
LikeLike
The wages of beta is death.
http://f2bbs.com/bbs/show_topic/941620
“CHANDLER, Ariz. (AP) An Arizona woman is accused of trying to kill her hospitalized husband by injecting fecal matter into his IV line, police in suburban Phoenix said Friday.”
LikeLike
That’s just offal. Why did she have to give him that kind of shit? Now she’s in deep doo doo.
LikeLike
What a waste.
LikeLike
He’s 66, she’s 65… and trying to kill him… yup, beta.
LikeLike
Whatever, he’ll get an infection, they’ll treat it with antibiotics.
You want to kill someone with an IV line in, use potassium chloride. 😉
LikeLike
He’d have to be stuporous, otherwise would burn like hell and the screaming would alert the staff.
LikeLike
As someone who was just recently royally played by my ex gf who i would describe as a psychopath emotional vampire…the idea of Scray’s manipulation game frankly seems like something girls would do for attention.
Also, i personally don’t see this as “game” because it seems like so much work to do the “triangulation” thing.
Isn’t it far better to develop competitive anxiety through confidence in your social circle rather than “snake in the grass” game?
I’m all for getting a girl’s hamster going but this seems more “gamma” than game.
LikeLike
Update please. You keep alluding. You didn’t follow year rally’s ado give again and she was the one playing u?
LikeLike
Bingo.
You’ve described the difference between low-class pick-up artistry and alpha.
LikeLike
lol try it. You might be surprised at how easy it is. The only reason this is bad is because you’re internals won’t develop and you know…..the general question of “is this ethical?”
idk, I’m in this to explore as much as I can. The good side, the dark side, whatever. Pursuit of virtuosity and all of that.
LikeLike
@Scray, the question for me isn’t whether it’s ethical, but whether it’s “fun” for me. Fucking someone over isn’t worth all the drama that comes with.
LikeLike
The question is how many abortions, suicides, mentally-scarred/damaged chicks, broken families/marriages/relationships, etc. you can carry on your conscience while you explore that dark side.
I can tell you right now that it’s a lot less than you’d expect.
Ever wonder why Naturals (who tend to just take what they want without giving a shit about the possible consequences) often go through super manic ups and downs, with a shitload of suicidal thoughts on those down-turns?
Do good in the world, make people glad they met you, and help them. The other path doesn’t end well. Dabble with it, but be ready to pull the chute before you go too far. But all I can do is warn you and hope shit works out for ya.
LikeLike
Truth!
LikeLike
Who cares for ethic, that was something invented by crazy Greeks
Do not even let a thousand of dead to separate you from your next pussy
When you peruse “virtuosity and all of that” you should not be measured by ordinary standards of decency
God, just to think that such a crap would interfere with making of an virtuoso…
LikeLike
@Cortesar the point here isn’t whether women a douchebags…they are. They point is whether by YOU creating drama for them whether you’re actually just needlessly creating situations for yourself that are no fun to deal with.
Dude, i’m still struggling with the aftermath of a complete lying, cheating manipulating cunt. But as YaReally has rightfully pointed out to me and that has finally sunk in is that there really is no way to get even without destroying yourself in the process or delaying your own recovery in the process or enjoying any learnings or gains you’ve made in your personal development…in the process of what Scray is proposing.
LikeLike
give update on ex. why do you keep saying that? turns out she was playing you?
LikeLike
@Grim
Yes…I went against advice or rather caved in to what I mistook for her coming round after a 3 month “next”…
Long-story short, learn from it. Accepted a birthday date with some other guy who was scoping her just to piss me off. She broke up (for the third and final time) 2 days before a big event I was organizing leaving me to scramble to find extra held she would provide, acted as if nothing was wrong, didn’t come, got upset with me when I ignored her, defriended me, nothing at Christmas.
Then she came to my New Year’s party. We started talking, texting. She proposed a date to meet up, one day prior she suddenly canceled claiming she was having “trouble” with her move and needed to fix it blah blah blah, never rescheduled.
Unknown to me at the time, the next day she went out with the birthday date dude partying.
I meantime went on a long holiday. While I was away suddenly she started texting, messaging, Facebooking, emailing saying she was “very very worried” about me asking where I was. After 5 days of being bombarded I asked what was up.
She said she wanted to be “friends”.
I told her to fuck off.
Basically she was trying to relieve her guilt for going out with birthday guy by making it seem like she was concerned about me and leading me to believe she wanted a reconciliation.
Three learnings: (credit to YaReally and a painful experience)
1) don’t be a dickhead…..regardless of who left whom… when it’s over…leave and don’t come back. This idea of turning an ex into a fuckbuddy is dumpster diving.
2) When girls behave in that pattern above, most likely they are Cluster B types and cannot change so any attempts to “game” them are doomed.
3) telling a girl who screwed you over like this to “fuck off” feels awesome and is the only way I could think of to get my balls back regardless of whether this appears “butthurt”.
Meantime I’m now moving on, have other “plates” and chalk this up to experience.
LikeLike
“3) telling a girl who screwed you over like this to “fuck off” feels awesome and is the only way I could think of to get my balls back regardless of whether this appears “butthurt”.”
The opposite of love isn’t hate, it’s indifference. All news is good news. Quit saying ANYTHING to her. She doesn’t exist to you. You need to learn to be able to cut a woman out of your life if she doesn’t get with the program or you will end up still re-hashing this story 3 years from now with “and she just txted me last week so I told her “nope not interested!” and it felt so awesome”. She doesn’t exist anymore, time to move on.
LikeLike
(I know you say you’ve got other plates and have moved on etc., but I just want to stress it because I don’t want to see you posting in a month “so I’m thinking of inviting her to this party, is it a good idea?” lol)
LikeLike
I think Nexting is hard when the object of the Next is like…..the highest quality plate. The fine china. GFTOG only helps with that kind of scarcity when you can get 10 other equal quality girls, which ya…if you could easily get 10 other equal quality girls, you wouldn’t be a bitch about Nexting.
….
oooooooh.
LikeLike
@Scray
Well done, Grasshopper.
LikeLike
@YaReally & Scray. Thanks! It’s a tough one and appreciate the reality check. This is one of the hardest.
LikeLike
4chan poster does some math–http://i.imgur.com/CpZlvPJ.png
LikeLike
fucked up the link somehow http://i.imgur.com/CpZlvPJ.png
LikeLike
OT, but a good summary on a key event that impacts us today- the Balfour Agreement.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/world-war-i-led-to-a-century-of-violence-in-the-middle-east-a-946052-2.html
LikeLike
Heartiste, I really don’t understand why, from time to time, you voluntarily agree to lose 10-30 points from your IQ, wit, mind-power and knowledge to appeal to the kind of RoosV, Scray or Justin Wayne. “The brotherhood of men” of all races and backgrounds is an illusion, as much as the sisterhood. You are unique in the Manosphere (probably the second best is Nick Krauser) because you seem to have swallowed the Red Pill until the bitter (isolationist) end: sex, race, HBD, culture, un-PC history. Scray is a mutt with delusions of grandeur (I understood what exactly he is after following some older posts) who doesn’t fit in the same category as GBFM (brilliant trollish-like character, the court’s jester).
Women’s right to vote was the second evil in Western history. The first evil was to allow resentful minority men (after the French Revolution – the first ones were the Jewish men, or the American Civil War – Black men) to have a say in the “matters of the City” (to quote the ancient Greeks). The virus didn’t start with women (they just followed), but with the inclusion of out-group-men. You should read a classic of Western literature, Otto Weininger’s “Sex and Character”. It’s one of the most illuminating books regarding the relation between White women’s flaws and non-white, non-European men’s flaws.
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
Poor pajama boy…. There’s a good chance that that will be his legacy. Some men go on to build things. Currently, he has become a face of government intervention in a supposed free society.
LikeLike
“Poor pajama boy”? Have you looked into the guy? He’s a grade-A shithead. He’s the kind of creep who makes me avoid ‘liberals’.
LikeLike
Holy shit…I’m pajamaboy. Which way to the roof…
LikeLike
“Poor pajama boy”? Have you looked into the guy? He’s a grade-A shithead. He’s the kind of creep who makes me avoid ‘liberals’. Chem Snide
I meant “poor pajama boy” as a tongue in cheek remark. He looks like one of the many hipsters in the city I live in trying to divert public funds into urban utopia and feel good social projects.
LikeLike
“That’s all I got … I’ll get you a towel”
What does that sentence mean?
LikeLike
It means he was building and building through the recitation prior and then after making his grand finale he just… couldn’t… stop his love… and devot… devo… uhhh, uhhh
8==> — — — Oh… fuck, sorry about that.
LikeLike
the premature ejaculation and unimpressive sexual performance of a beta. read CH’s 16 rules at the same time…this is the “fuck her good” opposite
LikeLike
I think that Jews might not support your white nationalist movement. This might have something to do with the last one not turning out so well for them.
LikeLike
They (and blacks) would go to war to keep white people from going off and living by themselves if the new homeland were in another galaxy.
LikeLike
WW2 was Thermopylae.
LikeLike
For Finland.
LikeLike
Proof of innocence: misogyny http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/the-amanda-knox-verdict-isnt-justice-for-meredith-kercher-its-a-witchhunt-9101549.html
LikeLike
Anyone else think that Pajama Boy kind of looks like Johnny Galecki from the Big Bang Theory? Although that may be a bit of an insult to him. He was banging Kaley Couco in real life, after all.
LikeLike
CH you are battling idiots on twitter. Of course resistance training will benefit any man and grow muscle. It is also true that no matter how many squats I do I can never get the tree trunk legs of a black NFL running back.
LikeLike