• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Jerkboy Charisma Game, A Series
Psychopath Game »

The 20 Commandments of Involuntary Celibacy

February 3, 2014 by CH

The title of this post comes courtesy of commenter PA, who writes:

Behold the Twenty Commandments of Involuntary Celibacy:

The comments that follow are awesome — and each is hugely upvoted. A small sampling:

21. Don’t take advice from a columnist that just spews generalizations on Yahoo.
22. Instead, read the Comments section for real advice

Or:

My stomach turned after reading this. If a woman wrote this, no man would want to know her. This is sick. Reason why some men stay players for life, just to remain sane. Even players know when a good woman comes along. Even a player can have a change of heart and or mind.
Such writ-ups are the corner-stones players are built on.

Yes, the “Twenty Commandments of Involuntary Celibacy” is in reference to a Yahoo post called “20 Ways to Please a Woman”, written by a female pop culture borg entity. Here’s a few gems of her vapid boilerplate:

Be understanding if we’re workaholics
Don Draper’s got nothing on us.

Because a woman loves nothing more than a man who only wants to see her five minutes a week, when she isn’t slaving away for the patriarchy.

Don’t expect us to diet
Being skinnier is not that high on our priority list.

But it is high on men’s priority lists. And women don’t stay happy for long when their boyfriends aren’t happy being with them.

Don’t expect us to be gym fiends
Aside from your average stress-busting yoga – but it’s more for the head, not the body. If we want abs, we’ll get them. But not for you.

This is something women tell themselves all the time, but the reality is that looking good feels good because your DNA directive is to make yourself as attractive as possible to men with options, thus ensuring better survival fitness for any future children.

Be cool with the fact that we make more money than you
We can go Dutch!

Then maybe your post should’ve been titled “20 Ways to Please a Man”.

Bring us cookies when we had a crappy day at work.
Storebought or from scratch, either way.

Because there’s nothing like fattening up your girlfriend to make it easier to break her heart and leave her.

Let us watch our Bravo in peace. Better yet, go do something else while we watch.
Tease me all you want, but my addiction to Real Housewives of New Jersey doesn’t mean I’m not still smarter than you. You know it, I know it.

No, watching twat schlock doesn’t necessarily mean you’re dumber, but it is a leading indicator.

Just say what you are feeling instead of being weird.
Use your words like a big boy.

Yes, chicks really dig men who emote profusely like a View hag.

Do the dishes.
We can take turns.

And chicks love men who do the dishes. Oh, wait…

Remember our friends’ names, at least the important ones.
No, that’s not Jessica, that’s AMANDA.

You know what you call a man who easily remembers your female friend’s name? A cheater.

Be a good cook.
There’s almost nothing hotter. Especially to a girl who can’t cook.

And there’s almost nothing less attractive than a woman who can’t be bothered to cook a home meal. Be thankful you’re not a fat chick, because that’s worse.

Love our pet, even if you secretly hate our pet.
Especially if it’s a cat.

If you’re considering whether you need to ask permission to do something (like hang out with an ex), ask permission.
She should be cool with it, but it shows that you’re considerate of her feelings.

You know what’s really sexy to women? Toadies.

Read books.
Not just nutritional labels and Men’s Health while you’re on the treadmill.

Swap out Men’s Health for Vogue, and this is about as clear a case of projection as one will find on the vaginanet.

Don’t crash girls nights
No men allowed.

If you’re dating a man who wants to join your girls’ nights out, you’re doing it wrong. Or you’re dating a beta. Same diff.

So there you have it. If you’re a man who never wants to get near a vagina, follow this woman’s guide to pleasing her sex. You’ll be in the friendzone faster than you can unzip your fly and twiddle it to barely legal porn. A leetle rule of thumb you should keep in mind whenever you read nonsense like this article by Anna Breslaw: Women are thinking of that inconsiderate alpha male they really love and whose cock they can’t gobble fast enough when they write empty-headed crap like this. They’re reformulating the alpha’s refusal to commit as their frustration with his inability to suck up like a proper beta male. This sophistic legerdemain makes the pain of the alpha male’s commitment rejection easier to deflect. It’s no longer “his choice”; it’s her choice to live single and free and careening to spinsterhood because he doesn’t do the dishes.

But of course as anyone who’s got the slightest sexual experience with women knows, a woman in love will never let go a man who leaves his underwear on the floor. The alpha male lover is forgiven everything; the beta male wooer nothing.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Beta, Culture, Feminist Idiocy, Funny/Lolblogs, Pretty Lies | 225 Comments

225 Responses

  1. on February 3, 2014 at 3:20 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

    Vomit-inducing crap.

    Lesson learned: do the opposite, pretty much.

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 3:29 pm Heywood Jablome

      Her entire article is a shit test.

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 8:25 pm Zombie Shane

        > “Her entire article is a shit test.”

        Normally I would say, “This!”

        Because normally this would be just one giant shit test.

        But if you have spent any time recently in a university town – or in similarly libtarded environs [gubmint installations, NGO non-profits, etc] – then you’ll be well aware that The Darkness is so powerful in some of these chicks that there probably isn’t any hope for them at all.

        You cross paths with one of these really Dark chicks, and she’ll send a chill right down your spine, as it dawns on you that Western Civilization simply cannot survive if that Darkness were to gain too strong of a foothold.

        If you’re thinking about Gaming one of the Dark Ones, then I strongly urge you to poke and prod around in there to find some evidence that she hasn’t surrendered her heart completely to The Darkness – some reason to believe that she still has just the tiniest kernel of her humanity remaining which she hasn’t yet discarded.

        Something in there that you can work with in order to establish some common ground.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 9:53 am Bucho

        If you think they are bad now, wait til they hit menopause.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:35 am Zombie Shane

        And then they all chop their hair off.

        WTF is it with these aging libtarded womyn who think that it’s cute to get a little boy’s haircut?!?

        Like I’m Bob Dole and I’m gonna pop a Cialis if Liddy cuts her hair to look like River Phoenix?!?

        Sagging-tittied barren old cat-loving man-hating bulldyke wannabees.

        Fuck that shit.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 6:50 pm Heywood Jablome

        Fuck that shit.

        On the contrary: DON’T fuck that shit.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:31 am Heywood Jablome

        I lived in DC from 1996-98 while in the military, and saw plenty of those ruined and malevolent women. I try to avoid city girls in general, and live in the outer suburbs. I have no interest in exploring the twisted minds and souls of pretty but damaged women in an effort to get into and out of their pants without getting hurt.

        Those people need Jesus. I’ll look for a potential girlfriend in more promising venues. Cosmopolitan tankgrrrrrrls repulse me.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:36 am Zombie Shane

        > “ruined and malevolent women”

        Bingo.

        > “I’ll look for a potential girlfriend in more promising venues.”

        This.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 12:49 pm irishsavant

        I note that Breslaw’s parents were Holocau$t survivors. Am I a genius to have guessed that before checking it out?

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 12:53 pm irishsavant

        Of all the depredations inflicted on us by the Frankfurt School, their progenitors and descendants, feminism is by a long way the most destructive of society.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:33 am Heywood Jablome

        By the way, when you use that wonderfully descriptive term “The Darkness,” I picture you muttering poetry in a darkened temple, sweating and bald.

        The horror … the … horror …

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 4:21 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozoz

      Hey heartsitesstz!! Those cats represent the cats being delivered to 40 year old Trinity in the buttehxtz MAtrix!

      Trinity: I know why you’re here, Neo. I know what you’ve been doing… why you hardly sleep, why you live alone, and why night after night, you sit by your computer reading. You’re looking for him. I know because I was once looking for the same thing. And when he found me, he told me I wasn’t really looking for him. I was looking for an answer. It’s the question that drives us, Neo. It’s the question that brought you here. You know the question, just as I did.
      Neo: What is the butthex fiat Mathrix?
      Trinity: The answer is out there, Neo, and it’s looking for you, and it will find you if you want it to.

      [Neocon sees a black cat walk by them, and then a similar black cat walk by them just like the first one]
      Neocon: Whoa. Déjà vu.
      [Everyone freezes right in their tracks]
      Trinity: What did you just say?
      Neocon: Nothing. Just had a little déjà vu.
      Trinity: What did you see?
      Cypher: What happened?
      Neocon: A black cat went past us, and then another that looked just like it.
      Trinity: How much like it? Was it the same cat?
      Neocon: It might have been. I’m not sure.
      Morpheus: Switch! Apoc!
      Neocon: What is it?
      Trinity: A déjà vu is usually a glitch in the butthexMatrix. It happens when they change something. Now that I am an aging women in the butthex matrix with her eggs and gina drying up having given the best years of her anus to drunk alphas during her college desouling years via massively multiplayer asscockig in the butt sessions and getting her fiat mba (masters of butthexing in da Anus) and blowing upper level mangement lzozllz, the butthexmatrix is now delivering my cats. Two this morning and now two more. yaya! lozlzl

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 5:06 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Prepare for the Dalrockian Chruchian Police State, where the One and Only Way to Game, is through Dalrock’s Bunghozlzizolzi

        Dalrockzas tiny cockas writes a post titled, “How Christians can take credit for Game.”

        http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2014/02/02/dalrock-feeling-the-jealousy-of-cain-disobeys-god-moses-and-jesus-christ-and-tries-to-steal-game-from-the-great-heartistes/

        Then, at the bottom of the post, he warns folks against taking about GAme in the comments, or quoting HEartsietetzt or Moses or Jesus, as such conversations “derail the conversation.”

        According to Dalrock, only his own words, and his own words alone, can keep the train on track, gliding along the rails Dalrock set up so as to ease Game into Jesus’s bunzghzozlzzizziuzlzozzllzoz.

        Any attempts to keep Dalrocka’s “Game” out of JEsus’s bungzhozlzizol is seen as “derailing the thread.”

        Dalrock could have penned a post, “How Christians can take credit for Jesus Christ,” or even “How Christians can take credit for the Law of Moses,” as Jesus stipulated that he came to “fulfill the law of Moses,” (despite what Dalrock’s frankfurtian flock teaches), but unfortunately, apparently neither Jesus nor Moses make his wive’s butt nor gina tingzzlzloozzoz.

        And thus Dalorckkas tiny cockas wirtes, “How Christians can take credit for Game.”

        How can they do this?

        Well, firstoff Dalrock states that Heartsistetststs is a sinner, and then completely ignores HEartsisteetststz’ numerous posts on game, while falsely stating that “nobody has yet penned a post definining game.”

        Again, this ties into Dalrockas’s tiny cockas complete lack of manhood, character, honor, and nobility–his complete lack of Faith in Jesus and Moses, and his repreated failure to honor them in word and deed, even as he proudly displays the comments of Frankfartian, Marcuse-loving, family-hating, anti-Man Boxer.

        Dalorckkas tiny cockas future posts will now include, “How Christians can take credit for THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN.”

        At the bottom of the post, Dalorckas will remind his frankfurtain flock and write: MODERATOR COMMENT: PLEASE DO NOT DISCUSS THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN (BUT ONLY MY DIVINE WORDS), AS SUCH CONVERSATIONS TEND TO DERAIL THE THREAD.

        Dalorckkas tiny cockas future posts will soon include, “How Christians can take credit for MOSES.”

        At the bottom of the post, Dalorckas will remind his frankfurtain flock and write: MODERATOR COMMENT: PLEASE DO NOT DISCUSS MOSES (BUT ONLY MY DIVINE WORDS), AS SUCH CONVERSATIONS TEND TO DERAIL THE THREAD.

        And finally, Dalorckkas tiny cockas future posts will be, “How Christians can take credit for JESUS CHRIST.”

        At the bottom of the post, Dalorckas will remind his frankfurtain flock and write: MODERATOR COMMENT: PLEASE DO NOT DISCUSS JESUS CHRIST (BUT ONLY MY DIVINE WORDS), AS SUCH CONVERSATIONS TEND TO DERAIL THE THREAD.

        lzozozozololzolzolzozolz

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 7:35 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        I note in passing that Dalrock has not yet replied to your shots across his bow.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 9:44 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozozozoz
        that’ll be the day
        zlzolzozolzozoz

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 9:46 am Grim

        GBFM, reply to my question about how a man is supposed to be a real Christian and also have a wife and a sex life when THE LAW OF THE LAND and social mores enables–and actively encourages–attractive women to be alpha fuxing horrible dark hearted retards with the power of no-fault divorce.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 10:18 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Daar Grim,

        This is why Dalrock, despite his claims of being a Christian, never suggests that we exalt Moses and Jesus and the GBFM in our schools and courts.

        It is because Dalrock loves it the way it is, and thus command men to “GAme,” rather than exalt the LAw of Moses and Jesus.

        You should ask Dalrock why he thinks “men should lead by joy,” in a corrupt system designed to bankrupt them, and why Dalrock never calls upon anyone to exalt a Great Books Renaissance in the greater culture.

        OF course Dalrock will soon steal these ideas, just as he tried to steal “Game,” and claim it for is frankfartian flock of pajamaboy churchianszlzlzozozolzo.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 10:23 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        At the beginning of January, da GBFM wrote,

        http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2014/01/02/the-higher-form-of-game-exalting-the-spirit-of-genesis-moses-and-jesus-the-great-books-for-men-in-our-schools-homes-universities-churches-and-culture/

        The Higher Form of Game: Exalting The Spirit of Genesis, Moses, and Jesus–The Great Books For Men–in Our Schools, Homes, Universities, Churches, and Culture

        The Higher Form of Game: Exalting The Spirit of Genesis, Moses, and Jesus–The Great Books For Men–in Our Schools, Homes, Universities, Churches, and Culture

        Yes, ’tis a sad state of affairs with modern American/Western women and the decline of the family–liberty’s foundational building block.

        We would all like to change it, so we must ask. “How did this come to be?”

        Why did women come to disregard Genesis, the Law of Moses, and the Divine Wisdom of Jesus Christ?

        Follow the money, and one soon sees that the less time a woman devotes to her family, the more time she can devote to the corporation. The less time a woman spends cooking meals, the more time she can spend cooking the books in a sub-prime loan office.

        ‘Tis a short-term and destructive strategy–to encourage women to abort and pursue the material over the spiritual. But some do profit off of feminism–those who grow the State.

        I hope that in 2014 Good Men realize that the higher form of game is returning Genesis, the Law of Moses, and the wisdom of Jesus not just to the choir, but to our courts, schools, universities, and churches, and then, perhaps, we may again begin to see it in our homes.

        Best in 2014!

        Following da GBFM’s Biblical HEadship, Dalrock stole the spirit da GBFM’s exalted post, without reference, here:

        http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2014/02/03/headship-game/

        Frame

        Your frame is essential, and in Headship Game your frame must be a biblical frame*. To attain this you must first study, pray, and be humbly prepared to bend your beliefs and opinions to Christianity, not the other way around. As a Christian husband you are called to wash your wife in the water of the word, and you must take this extremely seriously.

        Note how Dalrock’s words ring hollow, as unlike the GBFM’s approach, Dalrock says nothing about exalting the Law of the Land. Maybe he’s just stupid, but Dalrock needs to realize that any man laying down Biblical Law in their home will be hauled into court and have their assets seized. By not telling men this Truth, Dalrock fails to set them free, instead emprisoning them to gaming a berankified wifez zlzolzozozozo.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 10:24 am Grim

        I don’t read Dalrock at all. Only Heartiste and GBFM. Dalrock just pissed me off the one time I showed up there.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 10:59 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzlzozozo

        how did dalrock piss you off the one time you showed up tehre?

        did he try to bernenkikfy you when u weren’t lookingz?

        zlzozlzlozo

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:44 am Heywood Jablome

        Grim,

        When the entire system is corrupt and rigged, there’s no point in participating.

        Create an alternative.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 9:47 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        zlolzozozo

        da great thing about da emeinent heartsitez
        is dat he don’t even need to acknoledgeaz it
        when bunghzozzzlzo try to steal “Game”
        from him
        as he just calmy goes about his busineszzz
        posting more Truths
        that set us all free.

        but still, although heartsieteztz doesn’t need it
        i gladly consider it my duty
        when arroagnece and pride gets the better
        of churchians heading pajamboy schoolmarm frankfartian flocks
        i gladly consider it my duty
        to call them out
        on tehir not-so-pretty
        big lies
        “that the frankfartian churchians OWN GAME.”
        lzozozozozozozo
        epic failz

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 2:38 am Anonymous

        Neo: What is the butthex fiat Mathrix?

        Bwahabwahabwaaaa

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 4:29 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      zlozozozozozolzozozoz

      Dalrock tries to steal Game from the Great HEartistes by attempting to slide it into Jesus’s Bungholizlozzlzozozo. The Lying Dalrcok Bares False Witness Against the Great Heartiste, Lies, and Steals, while Accusing Heartiste of being a “Sinner.”

      While Heartistes constantly gets thanks from men for helping them with their lives and wives, Dalrock must toot his own horny horn, calling HEartsitetezz a sinner, while denying the Glory and Wisdo, of JEsus, Moses, and HEartsiteettzzzztz. While the Great Heartiste “Speaks the Truth” which sets men free, Dalrock the Churchian must deny the Great HEartiste alongside Moses and Jesus, accusing the Truth of Moses, Jesus, and Heartiste of derailing the Frankfurtian/Chruchian/Mother Hen “discussions” on his blog.

      Dalrock is now directly responding to this blog zlzolzozozooz. Keep in mind that Dalrock never suggests a renaissance in the GReat Books for MEn, nor reforming the divorce laws, but instead he commands men to go to Church and Game the slutty Churchians, because Dalrock has found that game makes his marriage “happy.” Never mind the millions of men forced into divorce, childlessness, and destitution by the court system and the failed Churchian Churches which exalt lying, stealing, and GAme over Moses and Jesus–Men must simply learn to “lead by Joy,” game their slutty wives, and leave the Law to the Dalrockian Churchianszlzlzzolzlzl and Frankfurter flockz to deconstruct and destroy.

      Dalrock writes, “However, we would do well to remember that he wasn’t trusted to share the wisdom and beauty of Christian marriage and sexual morality with the world; Christians were.”

      Well, HEartiste is a far greater Christain than Dalrock the gamey thief, Boxer, and all the Churchian deniers of JEsus and Moses, as never once has HEartiste denied the Glory of Jesus nor Moses, while the Churchians stipulate that Jesus came to abolish the law of Moses and teach Dalrockian game. While Dalrock must lie and deny HEartistes, Moses, and Jesus, HEaritsietz exalts in the tenets of Jesus, Moses, and HEartsitetstzt.

      Love the graphic here–Dalrock and his wife trying ts steal Game from the Great HEartistes, for their “happy marriage,” while they call Heartsietsststz a sinner.

      http://vivalamanosphere.com/dalrock-feeling-jealousy-cain-disobeys-god-moses-jesus-christ-tries-steal-game-great-heartistes-will-fail-go-lzolzozozozozozolzlzozsillychruchcinazlzl/

      Long before this, the original Chruchiansz/Fathers of Dalrock stole the Gospel of Jesus and nailed Jesus to a cross, and then proceeded to corrupt the Gospel of Jesus and teach that Jesus came to deny the LAw of Moses, as they gamed womenz, collected tithingzzgzgz, and sold indulgences, in the same way Dalrock now announces that the One, True, Holy Way To Game is through His Blog, warning his Frankfurtian flock not to derail the discussion by citing Heartiste, Moses, JEsus, and the Truth that sets us Free. lzozozoz So when are Dalrock and his Wife going to nail Heartsietsttz to a cross, so as to establish their churchian church of game? lzozozoz

      Dalrock tries to steal Game by attempting to slide it into Jesus’s Bungholizlozzlzozozo. The Lying Dalrock Bares False Witness Against the Great Heartiste, Lies, and Steals, while Accusing Heartiste of being a “Sinner,” passing judgment on the splinter in the Noble HEartiste’s eye, while ignoring the massive plank in his own.

      Because the Dalrockian Churchiansz exiled Moses and Jesus who came to Fulfill the Law of Moses from their Church, they must now instead follow Dalrock and his butt-and-gina-tingle-centered “happy marriage,” instead of Moses and Jesus.

      http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2014/02/03/dalrock-tries-to-steal-game-from-the-great-heartistes-by-attempting-to-slide-it-into-jesuss-bungholizlozzlzozozo-the-lying-dalrcok-bares-false-witness-against-the-great-heartiste-lies-and-steals/

      lzozozozozozolzozozoz

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 5:15 pm l82dagame

        Thank you! Some day there will be a Catholic Church somewhere named St. Chateau Heartiste. It will include a coed high school where the boys are all alpha and the girls don’t ride the cock carousel.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 5:30 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        YES!!!!

        St. Chateau Heartiste.

        “Where Pretty Lies Perish, And The Truth Sets Ye Free, From Bastard Child Support and Alimony.”

        lzozozozozozoozl

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 8:27 am Diogenes the Cynic

        I’m designing the Novena candle as we speak! Maybe this will go over better than my David Koresh Novena candle.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:46 am Heywood Jablome

        I wonder what a Damascus Road experience for Heartiste might look like.

        LikeLike


      • on February 5, 2014 at 7:41 am michaelaurelius

        Ubi Perfidiae Bellae Pereunt

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 4:36 pm burke

      only one worth following is remember her friends’ names. likely better looking and if she’s the type of person she seems like, she has friends that will be more than willing to stick it to her with an ex. it’s nothing like seinfeld– girls love to do that to their ‘friends’ (i don’t believe they have them). and with the least bit of confidence that it won’t go public (the only feedback loop that matters to girls), it’s a gimme.

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 5:05 pm BlackPoisonSoul

        Only frenemies.

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 5:57 pm Harkonnen

      For reference, here is her Twitter account which will give context. Unattractive, mannish, and hangs out with beta males. https://twitter.com/annabreslaw

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 7:37 pm Greg Eliot

        Let’s not mince words… she’s just (yet) another loud-mouthed, big-nosed kikess whose (ahem) frontrunner tribal members allow her an MSM forum to spew her feminist Cathedral folderol.

        Next

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 7:44 pm Dr.F

        You sir, are exactly correct. No such drivel could come from anything else other than the mind of a J-triber.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 3:13 am L. Jon Hubbard

        “I’m smarter than you” with a such silly disclaimer is quintessential Jewessness

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 3:32 am L. Jon Hubbard

        Sorry, should be “as a disclaimer to something so silly”.

        It’s the arrogant boasting (which is never attractive in women) when the proper attitude is sheepishness (e. g., “I know I’m too smart for that kind of stuff, I don’t know why I bother watching it”.)

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:54 am Lara

        You can only get away with saying you are smarter than he is, if you both know it isn’t true.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 8:28 pm Zombie Shane

        > “her feminist Cathedral folderol”

        ‘Cathedral’ really ought to be ‘Synagogue’.

        I mean seriously.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 8:34 pm Zombie Shane

        I just made the mistake of glancing at her twitter, and the poor Jewess is so homely that I kinda feel sorry for her:

        God, I’m way too much of a White Knight.

        But even Jewesses don’t deserve to be quite that ugly.

        Sheesh.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 3:10 am Carlos Danger

        Why that’s the nicest thing you’ve said about Catholics all year.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 5:36 am Zombie Shane

        Yeah, I was gonna add something about the Velvet Mafia, but I decided that it just made the sentence too cumbersome.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 6:54 am Greg Eliot

        That topic was covered awhile back in an article here at the chateau…

        In short, the consensus was yeah, nudge nudge… wink wink we all KNOW its leadership and main henchmen/women predominantly attend Synagogue…

        But for Samizdat purposes… and ironic tongue-in-cheek RealSpeak… Cathedral is the agreed upon nomenclature.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 8:52 am Silver

        But also, “Cathedral” is evocative of blind faith in concepts that science emphatically disconfirms. This produces a serious cognitive dissonance in a way that “Synagogue” could never do.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 10:54 am Zombie Shane

        Fuck that shit.

        That’s pre-emptive surrender.

        Like what John “Rastafarian-Cuckholded” Boehner and Eric “Frankfurt School Fifth Columnist” Cantor are planning for the upcoming debt ceiling “negotiations”:

        http://minx.cc/?post=346920

        Fuck them.

        And fuck Eric Cantor’s mother’s entire God-damned family tree.

        Never give in.

        Never surrender.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:28 am L. Jon Hubbard

        Yeah, Silver, Cathedral fits when you look at it that way. But apropos “Cathedralism” and what it evokes, “conspiracy” is the worst swear-word for Moldbug and his fart-smeller hangers-on. The top-level ruling class don’t really believe in the “we’re all the same under the skin” crap. And it’s not about “cheap labour”, either. Mass-immigrants into the West are military assets to them.

        There is surely another word that can capture their essence (and maybe Synagogue doesn’t fit for other reasons as you say) but Cathedral ain’t it (unless you’re talking about acolytes and useful idiots).

        Zombie: Bad example. Churchill delivered whole Europe to the multi-cult. If there were an underworld, his wretched soul should be forced for eternity to walk down Mare St in London (east from Victoria Park) at 12am holding the latest I-Phone.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 12:55 pm corvinus

        You do realize that “The Cathedral” term was invented by Moldbug, who IIRC is also a YKW?

        I still prefer The Hive or The (Borg) Cube, myself.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 10:17 pm Silver

        I couldn’t care less that Moldbug invented it. I’ve been most unimpressed by anything I’ve read from him but on this occasion he chanced upon a very useful term. So it offends catholics, big effin deal. It’s not as if catholics have been much help in the struggle for demographic sanity.

        LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 10:44 am Grim

      lzozlzozlzl CH speaking of milk:

      http://www.lightlybraisedturnip.com/story-for-women-on-matchcom/2013/3/16/a-parable-for-the-older-single-women-of-matchcom-told-by-pro.html

      Jason drank all the good millkz

      LikeLike


  2. on February 3, 2014 at 3:26 pm Scray

    This is how women treat you and expect you to act when you don’t give them tingles. If you find yourself on the other end of an attitude like this, just peace out. I don’t know why so many men stay in relationships where they are treated like shit daily.

    Even if you have ZERO game…you will find another girl of equal hotness playing the numbers game alone.

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 3:27 pm Scray

      Let us watch our Bravo in peace. Better yet, go do something else while we watch.
      Tease me all you want, but my addiction to Real Housewives of New Jersey doesn’t mean I’m not still smarter than you. You know it, I know it.

      Ewww. Eat shit. Seriously. Gross. Someone out there has to put up with that?

      LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 5:10 pm Loner Black

      “This is how women treat you and expect you to act when you don’t give them tingles.”

      This.

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 8:49 pm Alec Leamas

        I first became aware of game after reading blogs about discipline and “taken in hand” lifestyles (I can’t recall why, but I found it immensely interesting and a sort of half-dose red pill experience). There were several accounts of men married to shrews, how they had sought to please them in every way and cater to them, being the best husband that the media depicts one – doing all of the cooking, cleaning, allowing “girls nights” while having his whereabouts monitored and controlled by her at all times. They related taking their wives over their knees out of pure frustration and giving them a good, forced spanking on the rump, and how thereafter their marriages changed completely with more frequent sex, etc. and even how they carried these changes into their careers, etc.

        I have a definite suspicion that the likes of Anna Breslaw have a latent desire to be manhandled, spanked, and put into their place by a man.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 1:15 pm irishsavant

        This can only work early in a relationship. I had a friend who did all those things mentioned for his shrewish wife. With predictable results. Then one day, after about 20 years of ‘marriage’ he did a complete volte face. Sadly the ‘relationship’ transformed into open warfare. They never spoke to one another civilly again. I believe attitudes had become too entrenched.

        LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 10:47 am The Burninator

      It starts small, they never hit you with all of it at once. I’d say the first time you bat away two different matching category shit tests like the ones she presents, walk away. One shit test could be just to see if you’re man enough to tell her to sit down and shut up, but two in this list is a clear sign she either disrespects you entirely or she’s a complete psycho bitch case, and again, walk away.

      Looking at her Twitter I am left stunned that she can feel entitled to make *any* demands of *any* male on the planet. That girl couldn’t give her fetid vagina away at the Goodwill, let alone demand top dollar for it like she thinks she can do.

      LikeLike


      • on February 5, 2014 at 4:42 am Zombie Shane

        > “That girl couldn’t give her fetid vagina away at the Goodwill, let alone demand top dollar for it like she thinks she can do.”

        I dunno, man, Thwack and Scray might be down there at the Goodwill, dumpster diving for a suit or for a pair of shoes or for some nasty old jewess pussy.

        LikeLike


  3. on February 3, 2014 at 3:28 pm Heywood Jablome

    Use a given strategy because it works, not because women say it works.

    LikeLike


  4. on February 3, 2014 at 3:29 pm Toddy Cat

    Good Lord is this stupid chick for real? This has GOT to be some kind of parody. Advice like this is like a compass pointing south.

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 5:33 pm Amy

      Not a parody, just written for the extreme grrrrrrl power crowd. Nauseating, but hopefully not many men are going to Yahoo Shine for dating advice.

      This IS pretty much what girls are taught they’re entitled to from men. Men who have any expectations of them whatsoever are sexist and controlling. You can’t do anything nice for a man, because if you do you’re subjugating yourself.

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 8:09 pm Carlos Danger

        And still, the right man will have them blowing him in the morning and cooking him breakfast and singing.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 9:15 pm Amy

        Yes. It’s actually a relief to be with a man who does the opposite of all the touchy feely emo crap we’re supposed to want. It feels much more natural.

        I see all this super alpha “game” as a response to the western female entitlement problem. When 95% of the attractive girls have an almost impenetrable bitch shield, only the most extreme alphas can break through. If women were generally more demure, reasonable, feminine, etc., the average masculine man wouldn’t have to act like a psychopath to get girls.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 12:17 am GasButtox

        Amy,

        Shut….
        Your Butt..
        With a Coconut…
        Behind Pizza Hut..

        Ya Horny Sl_t…..

        LikeLike


  5. on February 3, 2014 at 3:33 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Funny two of the items on this list were “don’t expect us to diet” and “don’t expect us to be gym fiends.” I was walking out of my condo last night to get fruit and salad stuff when I passed by my obese, angry female neighbor who was stomping in with a pizza. I offered her a polite “hi!” and she grunted back in return.

    That, I think, sums up a very high percentage of American women in one small exchange.

    LikeLike


  6. on February 3, 2014 at 3:33 pm Preston

    The cognitive dissonance is excruciating.

    A self-proclaimed female sociopath offers, among other insights into the female id, more honest advice (**** added for emphasis) about what *really* pleases a woman. She also honestly devotes the final paragraph to the internal struggle that not just sociopaths – but all women experience in both wishing a man capitulates while simultaneously wishing he does not.

    —–

    “I have thought for a long time that I am probably a sociopath. I am good at picking up on what people want from me and becoming that person, which makes me very popular. I have mastered the art of being liked. I’m a pretty girl and have always easily found men, been married twice, and left both husbands after a few years because I was bored. Although I’m good at painting myself as the sympathetic party. The ironic thing is that I’m a social worker, and work with distressed families, people always ask me if it breaks my heart, or assume that I love “helping people”, and I usually go with this. I actually enjoy the fact more that my job takes me into scary situations, threatened violence or poverty-stricken crime-filled areas, and allows me to intimidate people. Sometimes people suggest that I should be able to carry a weapon, and I always say it is not necessary and make up some liberal bullshit about not wanting to carry a weapon (the truth is I love to shoot). I don’t feel like I need a weapon ever, I feel totally confident in my ability to control almost any situation. Whew. It’s nice to be so honest with someone. I probably sound like a narcissist, but I’m just trying to tell you the truth about who I am and my situation as quickly as possible.

    All of this to say, that within the last year I met a man who I’m positive is a Sociopath too. In fact we talked about it once, and he admitted to me that he wonders if he is. (I of course did not admit anything to him! The part I play with him is the slightly dumb but intensely caring and unable to lie enabler.) He did say that he has never had anyone see through him like that. I have never had any legal trouble, and he has been caught several times, for stealing essentially. It kind of makes me think I’m smarter than him. BUT I really do like this person, and not in the half-hearted way I liked my husbands. I am sure that it is his manipulation of me that has caught my interest, and an intense desire to WIN him. He has a girlfriend, in fact, now a fiance. He has been cheating on her the entire time he was been with her, with me. He lies to her about all kinds of things constantly because he wants to preserve her image of him as more normal than he is. (He told me he feels like if anyone knew the real him they would think he was a monster)**** I became OBSESSED with him. Although at times where I felt like he was into me, not as much so. But the moment he pulls away I want to devour him and possess his soul.****

    Is it possible, do you think, for two sociopaths to have a relationship? Or will it be this constant fight for control? I feel in many ways like a relationship with him might become the most honest relationship I’ve ever had with someone, I’ve told him this, but he doesn’t know what I am so he doesn’t understand it. Or maybe doesn’t want it. Do I really have feelings for him do you think? Or is this something that would disappear if I ever won him? I feel like he is the only man I’ve ever met who may hold my interest because of his own fearlessness and risk taking behavior. Wow. I’m sorry to ramble on like this, but I’m very interested in your perception of the situation. What do you think, is it possible for two sociopaths to find love with each other? Or will we just ruin each other in the end?”

    ——
    I’ll let you draw your own conclusions from the first paragraph (eg. the author of ’20 ways to please a woman’ is a secret sociopath hungry for a provider- aka another single woman ready to retire from the carousel).

    It’s is one of the most honest bits of writing from a woman regarding relationships that I’ve read; it is far more believable and entertaining than anything Cathedral-approved.

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 5:01 pm Amy

      Do you seriously think this describes a normal female?

      Ironically, it’s good she’s a social worker, because empathetic, compassionate women tend to burn out at that job very very quickly.

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 5:30 pm Carlos Danger

        Yes. Most women aspire to this level of indifference towards men. Women have no real empathy for men at all. They either worship them or despise them. There is little in between.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 5:47 pm Amy

        Sorry Carlos, that’s BS. I have empathy and there’s no way I’m unique. I’m a very ordinary chick.

        I agree men have to rebel against the vomitous pedestalization our culture puts women on, but they don’t need to believe all women are sociopaths to do that. It doesn’t even make sense. If women were sociopaths, they wouldn’t be so irrational. They wouldn’t be constantly acting on their emotions.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 7:44 pm Alec Leamas

        You have a capacity to pity, not empathize.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 12:57 pm Amy

        No, I have a capacity to empathize. Being the useless English major that I am, I do know the difference.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 9:24 pm BlackPoisonSoul

        Instant reflexive NAWALT with no thought behind it. Within 17 minutes, bet you answered @CDs comment instantly. Very amusing to see.

        Women are sociopathic because society has taught them that they can be as irrational as they choose. All the sackless Betas will simply go all doggy-dinner-bowl-eyed at her and fap ineffectually while they praise her for her “strong, empowered self” – aka being a selfish bitch who will two-facedly change her habits when she runs into an Alpha that makes her tingle.

        YAWALT.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 9:34 pm Amy

        Or, perhaps the women you meet appear to be sociopathic because they couldn’t care less about you. This might have something to do with your personality. You’re the common denominator, my friend.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:07 am The Burninator

        “So I at least have empathy for firefighters, killer whales, and manic depressive Norwegians.”

        I hear Norway is a nice country, with no shortage of flammable homes and apartments that belong to whalers. You might want to look into it.

        Kind of funny, you basically described having empathy for ancient Vikings, who loved nothing more than discovering new lands and setting them on fire.

        All girls are not sociopaths, quite correct. But a man must go in with eyes open and with the full knowledge of the female psyche and how to tame and subdue it. A good woman deserves no less than a man who knows how to make her feel comfortable in her submission.

        The problem however is that feminism IS creating a default sociopathic state in those large herds of women who buy into its bullshit on a conscious level. And women don’t even realize it. And yes, the manosphere is a reaction to that, and only being supreme finger in the air arseholes will provide the cure at this point. I know for one that I’d like nothing more than to be the quiet, confident lord of the home who need not display such overt contempt as is prescribed these days, but women by and large no longer allow such a luxury.

        Amy, if you are for real and not just saying things to get attention, then I task you to find women in real life and convert them to a more sane standard of reality. The way things are going now, Western women are idealoguing themselves out of existence.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 12:51 pm Amy

        “All girls are not sociopaths, quite correct. But a man must go in with eyes open and with the full knowledge of the female psyche and how to tame and subdue it. A good woman deserves no less than a man who knows how to make her feel comfortable in her submission.”

        Well said.

        “Amy, if you are for real and not just saying things to get attention, then I task you to find women in real life and convert them to a more sane standard of reality.”

        Well, I try. Here’s a recent example of what happens: I change my hair color. I like it, my friends like it. But my boyfriend hates it, so I change it back. I am now surrounded by outrage that I would give up something I liked to please my boyfriend. But I said, there’s a different way to look at this. Why would you want your boyfriend to hate your hair? That’s not smart. He likes what he likes, as do the rest of us. When I put it that way, it makes more sense to them. It’s a mindset. You focus more on what you’re doing for him vs. what he’s doing or not doing for you. It’s not difficult and it doesn’t make you a doormat.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 8:13 pm Carlos Danger

        prove it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 9:29 pm Amy

        Prove what, that I’m not a sociopath? That’s tough to do online. Last weekend I helped organize a fundraiser for my firefighter friend who has a life-threatening autoimmune disease and is out of work until April. I just watched “Blackfish” and cried through the first half. There’s a guy who posts here from Norway (I think) whose posts I look for because I’m a little worried about him.

        So I at least have empathy for firefighters, killer whales, and manic depressive Norwegians.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 5:25 am nietzsche

        As Man is towards The Gods.

        WE MUST BE AS GAWDS! BRITISH ACCENTS!

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 7:19 pm Preston

        No, this describes a sociopath. But she is also a female.

        Unlike most normal women, she can divorce herself from emotional spinsterization to logically take a step back and provide us with a near-objective view of the internal dichotomy that afflicts most women regarding push-pull dynamics in relationships – eg. they want the man to submit while also not wanting him to submit. In her narrative there is a marked paucity of culturally-conditioned rationalization, (‘pretty lies’ as they were) just indifferent frankness.

        The stuff about her personal life and work-related motives is largely irrelevant to the point regarding relationships .

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 1:39 pm Amy

        The push/pull, want/don’t want internal dichotomy in normal women is about shit testing for male dominance. This is how the man earns the woman’s submission, respect, and ultimately love. We don’t actually want to win the shit tests. But this chick isn’t testing for any of this, because she couldn’t care less about submission or respect. She can’t feel love, so all she has is the cat and mouse game, which she wants to dominate and win. Then she moves on to the next challenge.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 9:11 pm Preston

        No, this describes a sociopath.

        But she is also a female. Her description of the internal dichotomy inherent in most women (herself included) -namely that regarding the irony of push-pull dynamics in relationships – is largely untainted by emotion and societally-conditioned rationalization that are painfully evident in the yahoo article.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 7:58 am aspergeryone

        Well, that site says that approximately 1 percent of people are sociopaths, so, Amy, you are obviously correct — most women aren’t sociopaths.

        LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 10:01 am JuiceDC

      That was the most frightening thing I’ve read in a long time. And she’s allowed to give advice to people in a top tier women’s mag? The editors didn’t fire her for being unfit for duty???

      I’ve been in the manosphere a while but if I hadn’t I’d have just been force fed the red pill after reading that.

      LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 1:10 pm Scray

      I call bullshit. She’s self-diagnosed, which is the first red flag. Women take on a lot of the bullshit of their former lovers. My guess is that she got burned by the sociopath and is now trying to backwards rationalize her baggage. She spent many years getting pumped and dumped, met a — relative to her — super alpha who imparted her with some of his identity, and now she’s just viewing her life through that lens.

      LikeLike


  7. on February 3, 2014 at 3:34 pm Tilikum

    if i never crashed a girls night i’d only have half of the side chicks in the stable.

    dumb bitch cockblocking her friends who are more than happy to strip that ring off in an attempt to be smooth, stuff it in their pocket and then strangely be all “you don’t have to wear a condom’.

    baby, don’t be “that girl” eh?

    LikeLike


  8. on February 3, 2014 at 3:43 pm alpharomeo

    Whenever I read an article that seems deliberately designed to turn white men into pussies and never have a hope of a functioning relationship or making a family, I google the author’s name along with the word ‘jew’. Nine times out of ten, my assumption is correct. Is it just a coincidence?

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 4:00 pm earl

      No…Jews hate everything that naturally works. It is because God designed it that way and they didn’t.

      LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 3:58 am L. Jon Hubbard

        Who “designed it” has nothing to do with whom the malign advice is overwhelmingly aimed at.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 6:18 am India_landoofRapes

        Jews are antithetical to nature, their whole purpose is to work against everything that is naturál and pure

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 7:09 am L. Jon Hubbard

        Wholesome, healthy, psychologically well-functioning white peoples, particularly Nordics and the art they tend to create organically (when they live in societies among each other) make them feel ill.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 7:37 am Carlos Danger

        They are deeply jealous on a certain level of their psyches, I’ve concluded It has become a learned cultural phenomenon for them.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 8:02 am aspergeryone

        I think it is genetic. They’re basically an extended family.

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 4:00 pm Theodore Logan

      No

      LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 5:44 pm Hipster Racist

      It’s not a coincidence.

      LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 7:37 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

      Yes.

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 7:39 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        I meant, yes I agree w/you.

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 7:46 pm Greg Eliot

      If these kike broads actually believe the bullshit they write, it’s no wonder Jewish men are either workaholic (ahem) frontrunners and/or headcase apparatchiks looking to corrupt everything and take everyone down with them.

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 8:15 pm Carlos Danger

        We will be destroyed because of the sin of Pride.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 5:52 am Carlos Danger

        Women spew this bullshit because they want someone to prove them wrong. I guess most J-wish men have been failing this shit test for a few generations now, at least. Which in turn ratchets up the bitchiness.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 8:03 am aspergeryone

        But pajama boy would be only too happy to follow all her rules.

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 7:54 pm Dr.F

      For me, the word J*w has become synonymous w/ sociopath, greedy, deviant, shameless, duplicitous and destructive. It’s just my honest observations over the last 2 decades. And we have these creatures running most of everything that you’d call “society” or “civilization”, which obviously explains the state of affairs all around us. The only god who chose this tribe is Lucifer, which some have admitted that Judaism really is all about. Forget the Torah, take time to read the English translations of the Talmud for some REAL INSIGHTS.

      LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 11:13 pm ( @ Y @ )

      Hah I’m glad I’m not the only one who’s been doing that and getting the same results over…and over…and over…..and over….and over.

      LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 1:31 pm irishsavant

      LoL! I always do the same. With the same ratio of success.

      LikeLike


  9. on February 3, 2014 at 3:54 pm little spoon

    Interesting that I have never seen you mention lack of cooking as a major negative.

    [CH: I’ve never talked about flagellum either, but that doesn’t mean I think microbiology is a crock.]

    I always assumed it was pretty unattractive but shrugged it off in part because guys keep going on and on about other things such as looks.

    [A woman’s looks are necessary but not sufficient for a man to experience a happy, long term relationship. And yes, this fact has been mentioned plenty of times on this blog, your phony strawcunt to the contrary notwithstanding.]

    Don’t hear much about domesticity. Aside from cooking, is there other domestic stuff that is a bonus?

    [My advice: Start framing your questions with more deference to the sharp eye and keen intellect of the CH lordship. Otherwise, prepare to be dumped sans pump at a moment’s notice.]

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 4:10 pm Maya

      ”prepare to be dumped sans pump”

      good neg

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 8:09 pm gu

        ………..sigh

        That’s not a neg you silly

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 4:11 pm little spoon

      Deference? Will fondness suffice?

      [CH: A woman’s true fondness is always wrapped in a patina of deference.]

      Darling, please please tell me about domestic type stuff that makes guys want to love a lady forever. Please. I send kisses from my heart.

      [The timeless feminine instincts are a clue: nurturance, affection, caretaking, fidelity, public modesty, etc. Imagine your man a king and you his chosen queen. Then act that way.]

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 6:38 pm little spoon

        Thank you. little spoon in patina for you:

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 7:20 pm little spoon

        ” Imagine your man a king and you his chosen queen.”

        Imagines self as chosen queen-

        But King man could stand a lose a few maybe.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 12:27 am GasButtox

        feministbutto(x),

        In the shadows of my buttox, resides a smeagol-like female, which is you, FeministX…

        If you hurry up, you can get here in time for when my buttox produce fire and brimstone, steepling columns of gas…

        [CH: “Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of buttox…”]

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 7:52 am RP

        [Imagine your man a king and you his chosen queen. Then act that way.]

        This.

        You may be barking up the wrong tree though.

        LikeLike


  10. on February 3, 2014 at 3:59 pm Joe

    A man wrote a problem page that his womans teen daughter came on to him. The old hag told him to break it off with daughter. What could make him think her advice was impartial? Sucker if he listens to her. WWCHD?

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 4:31 pm corvinus

      WWCHD? Dump the mom and get with the daughter, of course.

      LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 4:01 am Glengarry

        Yes.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 1:37 pm irishsavant

        NOOOOO. Go for a ménage a trois! Does CH have to tell you everything?

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 4:55 pm Mario Fallopez

      There is only one thing to do. Run. Get out of there and don’t go back.

      LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 8:38 pm Col Nicholson

      Signed,

      Woody Allen

      LikeLike


  11. on February 3, 2014 at 4:01 pm Kim du Toit

    Projection, wishful thinking and self-delusion, all in one big shit sandwich. This is not an article that should be posted so close to dinner time, Monsieur l’Artiste. Fucking hell, my appetite went away faster than Michael Schumacher down a ski slope.

    I think I’ll just have a liquid dinner instead, to wash the foul taste out of my mouth. Nothing less than 15-year-old Aberlour is called for.

    LikeLike


  12. on February 3, 2014 at 4:06 pm earl

    1 way to please a woman.

    Tell her to go #backtothekitchen.

    LikeLike


  13. on February 3, 2014 at 4:07 pm Johnny Caustic

    Notice how she keeps returning to the theme that a man shouldn’t expect a woman to do anything to please him. “Being skinnier is not that high on our priority list.” “If we want abs, we’ll get them. But not for you.” “A girl who can’t cook.”

    It’s a recurring leitmotif in female writing on relationships: if a woman does anything whatsoever to please a man or make him happy, she’s betraying the sisterhood. They’re teaching a philosophy of total selfishness: expect everything and give nothing in return. It’s not just laziness; some of them will work quite hard to avoid the appearance of generosity.

    One thing too few people understand is that one must feel gratitude to feel happy; entitlement causes unhappiness. Women today are taught never to be grateful, which is why they’re all so miserable.

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 4:51 pm Mario Fallopez

      You nailed it. Heaven forbid you do something for someone else. Even if they get the benefit, it’s for you and only you. The author is heavily invested in this worldview, perhaps as a defense mechanism, but I hope she figures out that it’s baloney – and soon.

      I doubt it though. It’s a self-licking ice cream cone. If you follow her advice and wind up miserable in a relationship, well then it’s obviously his fault that you’re miserable. You shouldn’t have to change the way you are to make him happy, because vagina. If it doesn’t work, blame the patriarchy or the media or judge-y women or something other than the fact you’re a jerk.

      LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 5:01 pm Days of Broken Arrows

      ^^^^^ Excellent point. Would like to see this singled out as “comment of the week.” It’s a meme I see on TV and in magazine and it’s repulsive. AND it’s a major reason men in the US take to foreign women. They’re actually nice, helpful, and considerate.

      LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 9:24 am dmann

        It’s real simple. Woman was made for man — she is his helpmate. This is the path to happiness for women. Otherwise, misery. And the more she fights this, like a shrew, the less happy she becomes.

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 7:41 pm YaReally

      This. I’ve been experimenting with asking women what exactly they’re bringing to the table lol And when I get confronted with how I should settle down and get a girlfriend etc. I just say “Okay, sell me on it. Go!” It can be pretty entertaining.

      I love women, but a long-term monogamous relationship to me, especially a legalized one like marriage, just seems like adopting a child-like roommate that sucks half my resources away without offering much in return.

      I’ve said before, in the past getting married meant for a man that he was getting someone to raise his kids, take care of the housework, cook healthy meals for the family, take care of his sexual needs (or allow him mistresses), and generally keep shit running smooth on the homefront so he can focus on his career and making money to provide for them.

      These days getting married seems to mean the man still has to work a shit-load since his wife racked up a fuck-ton of debt when she was single, except now he also has to come home to do half the housework, cook half the meals or allow his family to eat unhealthy take-out/delivery, not get laid because his wife is too tired from work or gets too fat to be attractive, not be allowed to bang other chicks because she can no-fault divorce him for half his shit and custody of his kids, and on top of that his kids are raised by nannies or daycares, basically allowing strangers to raise his children and teach them about life, because his wife is busy working too.

      I fail to see the deal for the man here lol Like I don’t hate women, I don’t think they’re bad people, it’s just that they don’t seem to realize that the deal they’re offering is like saying “you lucky dog, I’m going to give you a chance to be my slave! Aren’t you excited for this opportunity??”

      Then contrast all that with the single lifestyle: Work just hard enough to secure your future and get by, doing a job you like because you had the freedom to risk a few years in the shitter to go the entrepreneur route, spend all your money on whatever you want, whenever you want, for whatever reason you want, devote a chunk of your ample free time to developing yourself mentally/physically and eating healthy, then slay a bunch of hot poon for free in casual relationships for as long as you like.

      I mean, ya, having kids would be cool and all. But in the current system, the way it’s designed, it doesn’t seem worth the risk and potential downsides.

      Now the question is: who’s going to cave first, in terms of revamping the deal on the table? The old spinster women with their 10 cats who feel like failures at life because their uteri have dried up and they’re growing old and lonely because no one has wanted them and their bastard children since they hit 35? …or the single guy loving his bachelor life, in the best shape of his life, with ample money to burn, working a job he likes, playing videogames all day or recreational sports with his buddies followed by beers and banging fuckbuddies?

      I plan to continue being patient until I see an offer I like. 🙂

      LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:26 am The Burninator

        @YaReally

        “not get laid because his wife is too tired from work or gets too fat to be attractive, not be allowed to bang other chicks because she can no-fault divorce him for half his shit and custody of his kids, ”

        Here’s some area where I have expertise that you do not yet have. The simple fact is that she will divorce you regardless of a mistress or not most of the time. If the statistic of 70% divorce initiations by women is correct, and if most marriages these days are ending in divorce, then it only seems logical to me to forget about “let you have mistresses on the side”. Just have them if she decides to go the sexless shrew route, because honestly once it gets there the divorce papers are as good as served in time. The bitch is going to divorce you anyway, sooner or later, for no reason at all most likely except “I’m booooored….I’m not haaaaaapy”, so why worry about the inevitable and what you may mistakenly think will cause a divorce? Dude, if it ain’t a mistress, it will be something else far more trivial. Have a mistress, hell stack them like corded wood, they’re great fun.

        This is all assuming that a man gets married. You make a good case for avoiding the institution altogether.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 5:25 pm YaReally

        lol I agree. I normally advocate for setting open honest relationship frames from the start and avoiding legal marriage to avoid drama and having to sneak around etc, but that’s for the guys getting into new relationships.

        The only time I’ll actively recommend sneaking around is in situs where the guy is “trapped” because he got legally married before discovering game or whatever and he’s too far in to turn the relationship’s frame around without immediately triggering divorce and possible custody loss of his kids.

        Any guy actively getting married in this day and age is fucking insane and/or ignorant. But social conditioning works…even a few of the biggest Naturals I know are looking forward to marriage. Just slip that noose around your neck guys, don’t worry it’ll be fun!

        LikeLike


      • on February 5, 2014 at 11:28 am Tilikum

        now that is solid shit right there. i wish i cared enough about you jaboons to type that all out. till then, i cut and paste the gospel according to ya.

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 7:43 pm Greg Eliot

      Nicely put.

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 9:33 pm Rick250

        “One thing too few people understand is that one must feel gratitude to feel happy; entitlement causes unhappiness. Women today are taught never to be grateful, which is why they’re all so miserable.”

        Maybe thats in part why women ‘love a man who takes and hates a man who gives’ as it is so refreshing to them, being takers all their lives, to have a man breakthru and genuinely take from them.
        They wake up to how good it is to give…like mothers feel to their childrens unapoligetic needs.

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 9:01 pm ACG1

      It’s funny, if you told me 2 years ago that there was a pro-male online community bound by its opposition to feminism, I would think this community’s ideology is simply the diametrical opposite of feminism. “Women aren’t oppressed, men are!” “Women aren’t overly scrutinized in the media, men are!” “Men need to stop worrying so much about pleasing women!” etc.

      But interestingly, the manosphere and the Jizzabel-sphere are defined by completely different outlooks on how to approach life’s struggles.

      Jizzabel: You’re beautiful no matter what anyone says! Your body is fine just the way it is! Gender roles are archaic bullshit! Don’t go out of your way to please a man, if he doesn’t like you for who you are then he’s not worth your while!

      Manosphere: You’re only beautiful if attractive members of the opposite sex believe so. Hit the gym you doughy manboobed fuck. Gender roles are natural and people who adhere to them are happier. Now here’s what you need to start doing to please the women you’re trying to bang…

      There is clearly a lesson about the female vs. male brain built into this ongoing internet feud.

      LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 4:55 am NiceGuyGoneCad (@NiceGuyGoneCad)

      Women have always been ungrateful and will be forever. In the past they were forced to show some gratitude, these days are allowed to act like entitled bitches. If they feel that a man is doing something for them just to qualify themselves, they’ll despise him and abuse his good will as much as they can. Give them always less that you demand.

      LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 9:43 am Silver

      They’re teaching a philosophy of total selfishness: expect everything and give nothing in return.

      That’s precisely the attitude the something-for-nothing brigades bring to the table. A prime example is contained in this leftard excretion over the “failures of integration.”

      Were those parents being petulant, entitled, and racist? Yes. They also weren’t wrong. Because integration is two different things. It is “intergroup, interpersonal living,” learning to empathize with one another through shared cultural experience. But integration is also about access to wealth and power.

      Leftards are obsessed with “access” to wealth, never its creation. That’s a message which, for obvious reasons, goes down well with blacks.

      LikeLike


  14. on February 3, 2014 at 4:21 pm Eric

    don’t expect us to diet

    As long as you’re pleasing to the eye I don’t care how you do it.

    Fat ain’t pleasing.

    LikeLike


  15. on February 3, 2014 at 4:36 pm Wolfie

    don’t expect us to diet

    Don’t expect us to stay.

    LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 4:56 am jez

      Haw!

      LikeLike


  16. on February 3, 2014 at 4:39 pm Mr.C

    LOLZ at the Cats meme.

    LikeLike


  17. on February 3, 2014 at 4:42 pm young alpha cad

    CH, what can I do to become an alpha male? I’m using your advice and your commandaments. I still can’t get teh pussy. lolzorlolzzzor (is this the right way to write it?). I hate manginas, manjaws and feminists. Omega males are bad in the world. Long live the alpha. Anyway, I hope you will give me good advice. Here is a picture of me btw http://i.imgur.com/C7QDDsP.png
    Also, I’m watching Mad Men and Game of Thrones and I guess they are helping me in becoming more alpha and having the good frame. I’m also reading all the pick up lines I can read so that I can give the good DHVs when I cold approach women.

    [CH: Troll.]

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 7:54 pm Uncle Elmer

      But a funny troll.

      LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 7:51 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Sure, but it sucks that he’s using that poor kid’s picture to do his trolllollollolling.

        LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 4:10 am L. Jon Hubbard

      When this car’s restored someone will be glad to buy it and drive it.
      http://bringatrailer.com/thats-an-older-listing-its-no-longer-available/#r=true&year=1955&car=Chevrolet%20Corvette

      This one not so much (even if completely restored to factory specs)

      LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 1:03 pm take her out

        dude I love Caprice/Parisienne’s

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:36 pm L. Jon Hubbard

        Let’s talk about your childhood trauma.

        LikeLike


  18. on February 3, 2014 at 4:42 pm Scray

    http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/advice/things-not-to-say-to-a-girl-who-has-been-cheated-on?link=rel&dom=yah_life&src=syn&con=blog_cosmo&mag=cos

    These are all lawlzworthy — linked from that article.

    10. “You’re too picky.” No I’m not, I just know exactly what I want and I’m not about to lower my standards.

    LikeLike


  19. on February 3, 2014 at 4:51 pm walawala

    This is a “How to” guide for the Friendzone.

    I see guys here in Asia following this to a “t” thinking this is how to get into a girl’s pants.

    They ask girls out saying “I’m only asking you out as a ‘friend'” when they and the girl know it’s quite the opposite but sets the tone for the girl leading, using the guy to make some alpha guy jealous or perpetuating the kind of shitty princess behaviours now all too common among girls I meet.

    I followed this advice in the past. I only works to “endear” you to someone NOT turn them on sexually.

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 9:07 pm Scray

      LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 6:00 am Carlos Danger

        This guy is good. He nails it too. He gave a great tactic for winning arguments. Women don’t really understand right from wrong anyway, they argue to win. Say it and split is a great tactic for winning and argument. Stay gone till they call you too, then stay gone a little more.

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 11:41 pm AlmostAnonymous

      ick.

      yes, this is true.

      LikeLike


  20. on February 3, 2014 at 5:20 pm redpillcomic

    When you’re hunting deer, whose advice do you ask? The hunter or the deer?

    [CH: heh.]

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 5:42 pm JCclimber

      The continually successful hunter, not just any ol’ hunter. The one who has studied the craft and honed it over the years.

      LikeLike


  21. on February 3, 2014 at 5:50 pm Anon

    The article was brilliant satire! (don’t tell me it wasn’t satire?)

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 9:46 pm Rick250

      It was just another shot of heroine for the spinsters, femcunts, and entitled bitches of the world.

      LikeLike


  22. on February 3, 2014 at 6:25 pm Kim du Toit

    “For reference, here is [Anna Breslaw’s] Twitter account”

    Harkonnen, posting a link to that fruitbat’s picture is going to send you straight to hell, without passing Go or collecting $200. Sweet Jesus. No man should.

    LikeLike


  23. on February 3, 2014 at 6:32 pm Charlie Dont Surf

    Cats! Again, with the cats … The sight of those things make my ‘nads shrink.

    LikeLike


  24. on February 3, 2014 at 6:37 pm Libertardian

    http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/02/wikipedia-is-very-masculine-so-feminists-pledge-to-fix-it/

    “Feminist groups at more than a dozen universities are planning to participate in another mass “edit Wikipedia day,” because the free, volunteer encyclopedia website is obviously horribly sexist.

    Sarah Stierch, a Wikipedia contributor and researcher for the Wikimedia Foundation, said the problem isn’t just that most Wikipedia user are male. The layout of the website is itself “very masculine,” she said.

    “It’s aesthetically very masculine in its design,” said Stierch in a statement to The Daily Dot, also noting that, “The average Wikipedia editor is a well-educated white male. Well-educated white males have been writing history and the story of the world since ancient times.”

    To fix this, feminists at colleges around the country are launching another ‘Wikipedia Edit-A-Thon.’ Next week, feminists are encouraged to change rewrite the online encyclopedia to make it less masculine, according to Campus Reform.

    The event is a follow-up to last year’s similar edit-a-thon, when feminist sympathizers were called to edit “feminist thought” into Wikipedia articles.”

    I’m guessing the article on “White Privilege” should be safe at least.

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 6:49 pm SGOTI

      Ms. Stirch meant to write, “Well-educated white males have been MAKING history…”

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 7:33 pm Libertardian

        That’s just as bad in their eyes, since the unconscious goal of socialism is a return to savagery.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 8:59 pm corvinus

        One great example of an ideal socialist state: Democratic Kampuchea.

        LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 9:04 pm cynthia

        Well, clearly, the reason why there aren’t tons of reports about genderqueer and lesbians and trans and whatever else saving the world is because the white patriarchy hatefully omitted them from the history books.

        I’m sure there has been some whitewashing (our modern standard of “objectivity” is and always will be an aberration) but at the same time, if these women actually knew anything about history, they’d known that it’s only been since about 1890 that anybody’s given a shit about any of their sacred cows.

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 8:01 pm Uncle Elmer

      So what’s their plan, to have a celebrity sidebar on every page?

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 8:56 pm Bobby_From_Pepper

        *golf clap*

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 8:12 am aspergeryone

        I think little pink hearts.

        LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 8:18 pm gu

      The funny thing in all this is that Wikipedos are some of the most scalzied SWPLs you could possibly find. “Anthropology being the study of “Man”? I don’t think leading anthropologists would call it that and for good reason.” Then there is the hilarious good goy propaganda. But no it needs to be more neutered….

      I also find it funny how they gloss over the fact that this makes women look like the intellectually uncurious creatures they are.

      LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 10:16 pm ACG1

      “Well-educated white males have been writing history and the story of the world since ancient times.”

      For which the token feminist explanation is that only white males have had the opportunity and privilege to write history. Yet this ‘problem’ still exists even on a website written by anyone who feels like volunteering? I’d pay to hear one of these vapid imbeciles rationalize that one.

      LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 10:31 pm tang3zang

      There couldn’t be more ivory tower feminist bullshit on Wikipedia.

      If there was news of any other organization planning to mass edit Wikipedia, the admins would have a fit and convene to protect pages. Something tells me that’s not going to happen here.

      LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 11:31 pm Libertardian

      The Broncos lost because income inequality.

      LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 8:52 am eyeslevel

        The Seahawks only won because, you know, privilege.

        Congress needs to pass a law saying every game has to end in a tie.

        It’s only fair.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 11:59 am Hugh G. Rection

        Both teams get a trophy, but there is extra score for inclusiveness and diversity.

        LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 1:58 am Libertardian

      http://www.fredoneverything.net/Soul.shtml

      “The inadequate and barely lettered, by weight of numbers, can simply declare themselves the equals of their betters (or should I say “there betters”?). They don’t have to accomplish anything. They simply assert that they have done it, or that doing it is elitist and therefore reprehensible. I have in mind things like reading, scoring at the level of sentience on the SAT, or lifting mortar rounds.”

      LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 4:22 am Glengarry

      This could be fun. Let’s see if the editors mass revert the changes for starters. Don’t mess with omega territory, girls and shoggoths. It’s all they got.

      And in the larger scheme of things … put your back into it you lazy bitches. One day of editing as a PR stunt then wheezing out a victory lap, GTFOOH.

      LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 9:58 am quasi

      Is this the same Sarah Stierch as the former Wikimedia Foundation employee, fired for undertaking paid edits?

      LikeLike


  25. on February 3, 2014 at 6:44 pm And the Betas Wept...

    I am so glad this was posted here. I read it on Yahoo and spit up in my mouth at the shear insanity of it. Sigh… The Great Gelding is quickening now. This has all been prophesied.

    LikeLike


  26. on February 3, 2014 at 7:14 pm Kim du Toit

    My favorite: “Let us watch our Bravo in peace. Better yet, go do something else while we watch.”

    Cool. I’ll be in the bedroom, masturbating. To a picture of your hottest friend. Whose name I just now remembered.

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 8:43 pm Random Guy

      LOL.

      LikeLike


  27. on February 3, 2014 at 7:15 pm AlphaBeta

    It’s always amusing to get advice on how to date straight women from someone who has never done it. It’s like getting bridge building advice from someone who has never built a bridge.

    Choose to follow said advice at your own peril.

    LikeLike


  28. on February 3, 2014 at 8:00 pm Uncle Elmer

    Well, the essay is from “cosmopolitan.com”. And R. Don Steele, in his classic “How to Date Young Women for Men Over 35” advises that if she reads “cosmo” you are in luck as they routinely run features touting the pleasure of older men.

    LikeLike


  29. on February 3, 2014 at 8:13 pm Gil

    Nope. No. Those would be the “20 commandments of voluntary celibacy”.

    LikeLike


  30. on February 3, 2014 at 8:18 pm tang3zang

    That sandwich maker is malfunctioning.

    Truth is, if you did all of those things, she’d think of you as a total pushover and feel miserable being with you.

    LikeLike


  31. on February 3, 2014 at 8:20 pm Gr8YT

    Take a look at the author..

    https://twitter.com/annabreslaw

    Already has the cat thing going to match her other feminist schtick.

    Speaking of schtick…. I can’t put my finger on it but she appears to be a YKW.
    Just appears, can’t tell for certain with that whole attitude and face.

    I’m not sayin’ she’s a gold n1gger
    but her nose couldn’t be bigger.

    LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 1:50 pm irishsavant

      She is a YKW. You should have realised that from what she wrote.

      LikeLike


  32. on February 3, 2014 at 8:38 pm Alec Leamas

    Speaking of which, has anyone seen this show “How I Met Your Mother?” I never really watched it before, but have recently seen a few episodes here and there. Apparently, it is about the ever-present agony of a beta as he descends into an inevitable gelded existence as a married suburban schmo. I actually have to change the channel when the main character gets up to his usual beta bullshit.

    LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 11:13 am Glengarry

      As I recall, Cobie Smulders is/was pretty hot and the PUA with hundreds of notches is played by a gay man (so he knows what it’s like), that’s about it.

      LikeLike


  33. on February 3, 2014 at 8:51 pm Patrice

    Fair to say that every word in this bitch’s article is part of a huge stinking shit-test?

    LikeLike


  34. on February 3, 2014 at 9:00 pm Wrecked 'Em

    When women say what they want, they mean from a man they’re already attracted to.

    When men ask, “What does a woman want?” he’s asking, “How do I get to be that man?”

    Women don’t ever answer that question. Ever.

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 10:21 pm ACG1

      Excellent insight. Women aren’t equipped to give advice to betas because they never give betas a second thought.

      LikeLike


  35. on February 3, 2014 at 9:09 pm Patrice

    Offer to hold our stuff if it’s heavy
    Just offer.

    Someone help me out because my omega ass doesn’t know what to do in these types of situations.

    I just want to understand the principles even though specific advice would be great too.

    Do you help a chick who you’re dating by carrying her heavy stuff? What if it’s only for a few seconds? Ie. lift heavy stuff out of her car and bring it inside?

    What are the alpha do-s and dont’s of lifting stuff?

    If a girl orders you to help her and she does it in a bitchy way, that’s almost always a shit-test where she basically A. treats you like shit to see if you defend yourself, and B. she wants to know if you actually follow her orders, right?

    How do you respond to a girl? “You know I’m not in the carrying business” and then walk away?

    Don’t girls get turned on by masculine men who lift heavy stuff and do manly housework like chopping wood, building a deck, or going around shirtless with a toolbelt fixing shit? If a guy refuses to help lift her stuff because he doesn’t want to fail a shit-test, doesn’t that make her feel masculine since she’s the doing the manly shit instead of him? And won’t she get turned off?

    If he doesn’t take her orders she gets turned off because in the long run she’s doing the manly stuff, and if he does follow her orders she gets turned off because she chumped him out.

    It’s lose lose.

    Or would any woman who’s in love with an alpha not even test him for this stuff?

    I don’t necessarily want specific advice, general principles would be nice. This isn’t a troll post either lol.

    LikeLike


    • on February 3, 2014 at 10:07 pm Reservoir Tip

      There’s nothing beta in being a gentleman. Supplication is what is beta.

      See a girl having trouble lifting something? Yeah, help her out. Don’t rush to her side, fedora on your head, and beg to help her. Tease her.

      “Oh.., you couldn’t lift THIS?!”

      “Ah. Good thing a man like me is around to help you out.”

      You get the idea. Like anything, it basically boils down to execution and frame.

      LikeLike


      • on February 3, 2014 at 11:23 pm Patrice

        Good point, it’s all about “execution and frame”. An alpha can help her out and her eyes will gleam with excitement while a beta will do the same thing and she’ll have a flat expressionless face along with a monotone “thanks”.

        “Oh.., you couldn’t lift THIS?!”

        The hard part is mastering like you said, the execution and the proper frame.

        What if a girl responds indifferently with “Ya, I couldn’t lift that”. What then?

        “Ah. Good thing a man like me is around to help you out.”

        What if she smirks at this comment and rolls her eyes?
        At this point she’s smirking because you’re beta. Do you drop her stuff and leave? How do you leave with dignity?

        It’s all in how you execute (either alpha or beta) but I also want to know how things play out and how to salvage some of my dignity.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 4:24 am Glengarry

        It’s beta to be a gentleman to the undeserving.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 6:50 am L. Jon Hubbard

        That depends on your style. David Niven (equally or nearly alpha as Errol Flynn) could articulate, where appropriate, in his highbrow language, the equivalent of “suck my dick, you spineless weasel,, or maybe get your mother to when she’s done with the football team” and you would only have a barely perceptible feeling — that you weren’t quite sure of — that you’ve even been insulted.

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 10:24 am Glengarry

        I think in general it’s best for your inner game to avoid being passive-aggressive about these things, even if you turn as a nice phrase as David Niven. Nobody will respect you for it. Nor is it likely she’ll tingle if you rotate her tires or build her a deck or whatever.

        If a girl demands that you do something for her, you could always ask her why. The answer might be illuminating. (Spoiler: you’re probably an orbiter.)

        The best way to decline these tasks I’ve heard from somewhere around here is, “Sorry, that’s boyfriend work, and we’re not fucking.”

        LikeLike


  36. on February 3, 2014 at 11:19 pm JB

    Funniest thread in the history of the web:

    http://www.returnofkings.com/26763/girls-with-short-hair-are-damaged

    And its follow up:

    http://www.returnofkings.com/27536/publishers-response-to-girls-with-short-hair-are-damaged

    Guy says beware of dating girls with butch hair cuts, 5000 butch hair cut girls respond “I hate men!” and wonder why the author suggests they aren’t good dating material.

    LikeLike


  37. on February 3, 2014 at 11:50 pm Isaac Asstomouf

    “If we want abs, we’ll get them. But not for you… Tease me all you want, but my addiction to Real Housewives of New Jersey doesn’t mean I’m not still smarter than you. You know it, I know it.”

    when did this cunty writing style become a thing? its like the written equivalent of that stupid mustache on the finger photo.

    LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 2:32 am gilgamesh

      Why do I suddenly want to draw a hitler moustache on my finger?

      LikeLike


  38. on February 4, 2014 at 12:03 am WG

    Like these guys:

    LikeLike


  39. on February 4, 2014 at 12:39 am Anonymous

    CH you’re becoming alarmingly efficient in dismantling these things. You just summed up a ton of manosphere knowledge in one brief and light blog post, all without appearing to break a sweat. If you dropped the Nazi schtick you’d be one of my greatest heroes.

    LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 4:19 am L. Jon Hubbard

      One man’s “Nazi” is another man’s Dalai Lama and Spartacus rolled into one.

      LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 12:02 pm Hugh G. Rection

        I’m Spartacus!

        LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 6:26 pm thwack

        I am Spartacuz!

        LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 4:26 am Gro Haila

      There is no nazi shtick.

      There is “Look! These fucking zhyd frontrunners and housenigger monkeys!
      Cathedral’s cracker faithful? Never heard of ’em” commenter shtick.

      LikeLike


      • on February 5, 2014 at 12:45 am L. Jon Hubbard

        It is merited to single out for especial approbation our own self-traitors roughly so often as it is for Abe Foxman to single out the “self-hating” of his own ethny (i. e., not that often). And Foxman isn’t faced with the situation where anywhere near 90%+ of his target ethnic group is rabidly opposed to his group having its own nation.

        LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 6:05 am Carlos Danger

      Can’t have one truth and ignore the other.

      LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 7:03 am Greg Eliot

      If you dropped the Nazi schtick you’d be one of my greatest heroes.

      Ah, now there’s motivation!

      I don’t know about you guys, but I’m going to make a concerted effort to taper off… this week, I only terrorize Jewish dwarfs.

      LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 9:36 am L. Jon Hubbard

      Non-sequitur (granting winners’ histories are accurate/factual): Heartiste’d prefer his country club not have any [fill-in-the-blanks] as members, therefore he wants to round up, put in camps and gas six million of them.

      LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 11:15 am Frank Discussion

      Godwin’s!

      LikeLike


  40. on February 4, 2014 at 2:21 am Zelazny

    I stumbled on this site a few years back. Read it diligently and though I never went sarging like the real players, I’ve internalized at least some of the advice. Over the years I had gotten bitter as I’ve shed my old views and started to resemble a more self-amused cynic.

    And it works and is true. I used to be a chameleon that molded himself to the wishes of others. Trying to be a good boy and getting a lot of women on my energy, wit and charm only to lose them after a few months as I became a soppy wreck that couldn’t hang on to his self-respect.

    Now I have a woman where I smack her ass when I feel like it. Whom I pound when I feel like it and loves to be used as my little cumdumpster. I can live in a huge mess, burp in her face and do whatever I want to do. She’s happy to follow my lead. I’m not at the skittles level yet, but the few times I feel like being generous, it is appreciated enormously because it’s something I give her because I want to. Not quite skittles girl, but close.

    The greatest thing is how she keeps on trying to make me jealous by talking about how other men are vying for her attention. Where fear would grip my little passive-agressive insecure beta hart, I don’t even react or stoke the fires with things like “Cool. There’s this redhead who keeps flirting with me too. Nice ass.” The power play is fun to watch and I invariably win as she gets jealous.

    As expected, she post-coitally confides in me how she never felt jealous about ‘her’ man before and that she never felt this good or enjoyed her body being used. Women seem to have this built-in stockholm syndrome, where they bond absolutely with the man that takes power over her.

    I hope to stick around with her for a while. She’s thin, feminine, sweet, has a submissive demeanor. She loves to please me and wants me so badly that she travels hours just to spend a night with me. I’ve started suggesting women to have a threesome with and though she feels slightly threatened, there is no doubt that I’ll have two women in my bed pretty soon.

    Praise where praise is due; Athol Kay (Marriedmansexlife.com) taught me most about relationship and how to keep them going (And the forum there showed me the dangers of not taking control of your relations and sex life) and big props for Mark Manson (markmanson.net) whose self-help and articles actually get you into the alpha mindset without resorting to all this butthurtedness.

    But as far as the dark arts go, I’ve learned most about attraction and what women really are from you. I’ll go enjoy this knowledge.

    LikeLike


  41. on February 4, 2014 at 3:05 am The 20 Commandments of Involuntary Celibacy | T...

    […] The title of this post comes courtesy of commenter PA, who writes: Behold the Twenty Commandments of Involuntary Celibacy: The comments that follow are awesome — and each is hugely upvoted. A small sampling: 21.  […]

    LikeLike


  42. on February 4, 2014 at 5:10 am SFG

    OT: What’s GBFM going to do now that Janet Yellen has taken over for Bernanke? ‘Yellenified’ doesn’t have the same ring to it. ‘Yellen of Troy’, ironically? ‘Yellens’ for ‘melons’?

    LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 7:24 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      Back in the day, Homer’s Achilles and Odysseus Hellenized,
      Today women are Bernankified while men are Yellenized.

      zlzloozozozoz

      LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 10:27 am Glengarry

      Best I’ve heard is the bond-style ‘Ms MoneyPrinter’.

      LikeLike


  43. on February 4, 2014 at 5:52 am Anonymous

    The Cathedral still promoting cougardom while promoting the opposite would be considered bad taste

    http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/lifestyle/relationships/shes-78-hes-39-age-gap-is-no-problem-for-couples-featured-in-new-documentary/story-fni0dpm7-1226817557531

    LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 6:59 am L. Jon Hubbard

      Cougar?! More like saber tooth tigers.

      LikeLike


      • on February 4, 2014 at 7:04 am Greg Eliot

        Without the teeth.

        LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 12:56 pm corvinus

      Ew. Old people sex.

      LikeLike


  44. on February 4, 2014 at 7:00 am Just Saying

    Yeah – pretty much the EXACT opposite will work wonders. I know none of the women I see friends’ names. Mostly because who can keep track of who is the BFF and enemy this week? I have one that I call – screaming bitch – easy to remember she’s the one that hates me. Of course almost all of them do – of course, when I break up with their “friend” I’ll get calls from them sympathizing. Read that as wanting to be NEXT. Like they have a chance – of course, sometimes it’s good just to do a couple to lob hand-grenades into their camp. The more they talk about you, the better… 🙂

    LikeLike


  45. on February 4, 2014 at 7:03 am AlphaBeta

    Speaking of beta make cuckholds:

    http://www.slate.com/articles/life/dear_prudence/2014/02/dear_prudence_my_wife_may_be_pregnant_with_some_other_man_s_child.html

    My wife and I have a female-led relationship. Before we got married, I agreed that she could “take other lovers,” while I would remain faithful to her alone. She said that she might not ever see anyone else, but she liked that I knew she could. Well, now she’s pregnant, and I’m wondering the obvious. We do have intercourse, but not often. She was away on business near the time she would have conceived. I don’t know whether she’s ever had another lover. I could have asked that before, but now I’m afraid of how it would come across. Should I ask, or just wait to see if the baby looks like me?

    LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 9:47 am Gro Haila

      Lower, on the same propaganda site, a blurb on what a blessing is to be able abandon your children to “The Village” to increase ones ability to serve (“The Village”), and get a jumpstart on brainwashing. Like it’s done in countries more advance in the ways of “The Village”

      P.S. I think I will become one man voice for replacing the “Cathedral” moniker with “The Village”.

      LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 7:25 pm tang3zang

      If there’s even a slight possibility that such pathetic cuckoldry is genetic, I really hope it isn’t his kid.

      LikeLike


  46. on February 4, 2014 at 8:23 am AnonNotAnon

    Haha, instead of involuntary celibacy, how about a slippery slope to voluntary cuckoldry – first letter: http://www.slate.com/articles/life/dear_prudence/2014/02/dear_prudence_my_wife_may_be_pregnant_with_some_other_man_s_child.html

    Beta of the Year?

    LikeLike


  47. on February 4, 2014 at 9:16 am Master Beta

    “ask permission”

    Best bit. You don’t need the rest if you get this bit down.

    LikeLike


  48. on February 4, 2014 at 9:52 am Grim

    “80% of women…..experienced….partner….sexual something”….

    zlzolzozlzo

    and 100% of men have experienced spending hundreds of dollars taking women out to dinner and being nice to them only to get blue balls and coldness in return.

    LikeLike


  49. on February 4, 2014 at 10:01 am SW

    I’m a girl, and even I don’t agree with her bullshit list.

    LikeLike


  50. on February 4, 2014 at 10:43 am Grim

    mentally retarded guy boffing a grandma? That’s a great great grandma. A grandma should be about 50 or so.

    LikeLike


  51. on February 4, 2014 at 11:05 am RappaccinisDaughter

    RE: Your “sexbot” Tweet. Just clicked through and read the linked post. An interesting idea, and one that’s been explored in fiction (usually science fiction) a number of times. The one I remember most clearly was “The Silver Metal Lover” by Tanith Lee, which was, interestingly, written with a female protagonist who falls in love with a “male” sexbot.

    Oddly, perhaps counterintuitively, perhaps that scenario is actually more likely than the opposite. Because men are so visually focused, it seems the “uncanny valley” aspect of a sexbot would put them off more than it would a woman. (Given the challenges, it seems unlikely we’re going to see technological advances sufficient to the task of putting a bridge across that valley anytime soon.)

    Whereas I doubt it would be terribly difficult to design an AI sophisticated enough to mimic the level of conversation that the average woman requires out of her man. She’s already pretty well conditioned to “yes dear…no dear…uh-huh…of course I’m listening to you…”

    Would be interested to hear your thoughts…

    LikeLike


  52. on February 4, 2014 at 11:37 am Grim

    wow CH you are right this is an exceedingly well done article:

    http://www.returnofkings.com/28559/why-is-rebecca-sparrow-attacking-young-moms-for-staying-slim-and-pretty

    really really on point. wow

    LikeLike


  53. on February 4, 2014 at 12:46 pm Grim

    Have y’all noticed how the Hunger Games new hollywood darling, the fat and flabby and covered in moles 7 (but still cute only because she’s so young) Jennifer Lawrence has cut her hair and turned into a complete fembot trainfuck about as bad as the worst we’ve seen? Now that is a woman who needs a ballgag.

    LikeLike


    • on February 4, 2014 at 8:31 pm aspergeryone

      I’m just not sure she’s a 7. Possibly just a 6.

      LikeLike


  54. on February 4, 2014 at 12:52 pm Grim

    lzozlzozlozlzlz I thoguhtz the owmwomenz said that chivszalriszes isznt dead?!?

    Now I’m conbuthexedfused!

    http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/advice/first-date-dinner-bad-idea?link=rel&dom=yah_ca&src=syn&con=blog_cosmo&mag=cos

    LikeLike


  55. on February 11, 2014 at 9:14 pm Charmless Broad Unintentionally Submits List Of Excellent Negs | Kinkementary Expert Advice |

    […] she’s recently been dumped by an aloof alpha lover and is trying to assuage her butthurt ego by pretending it was his lack of betaboy politesse that really caused the breakup. This is never more apparent than when the limbically bruised bish […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Scanman on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    Captain Obvious on Natural Conservatives!
    Corinth Arkadin on Natural Conservatives!
    pelayo1683 on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    Greg Eliot on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    robertpinkerton on Natural Conservatives!
    Dome Beers on Natural Conservatives!
    Greg Eliot on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    Corinth Arkadin on Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Od…
    Bad Attitude on Natural Conservatives!
  • Top Posts

    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • Caravan Of Foreign Invaders Oddly Acquainted With Western Feminist Propaganda
    • NPC Culture, In One Meme
    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Sweden Vs Norway
    • The Three Abrahamic Religions, Abbreviated
    • Don't Help The Leftoid Media Sway Elections
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: