• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Study Finds The Foul Source Of Feminism
Overheard In [Redacted] »

Screwing With Girlfriends And Their Exes

February 6, 2014 by CH

DragonfromCY writes,

Urgent advice requested, there’s an opportunity for mischief in outing a liar. Bare-bones summary: 6 months dating a flaming s–t (far too long, I know, but the sex is great), going to a big bday party with her tomorrow.

She says there are no exes coming and she hasn’t hooked up with any of the men who are gonna be there–but from a quick perusal of her computer it’s clear she’s f—d at least one of them (a few weeks before meeting me), a guy who has a girlfriend (and cheated on her with my s–t girlfriend) so it’s like their dirty little secret. “This is between me and you, right?” he wrote to her, when she offered him “a ride”. She still keeps in touch with him, texting him stuff like “hey dude what’s going on with you” etc. That to me was the death knell of our hooking up–I don’t even want her as a f-buddy. She lied that she didn’t keep in touch with exes.

The guy will most likely be at the party with his girlfriend, and I’ll be introduced to him. I’d like to amuse myself by watching her hamster spin. I want to dump her soon. I might even wink at the guy and insinuate subtly that I know. Any advice on how to f–k with her/his head? For fun of course!

You can safely assume any girl who keeps in serious contact with an ex is still having sex with him, and then act accordingly. If you’re right, you dump a cheater. If you’re wrong, you dump a drama queen who loves to mentally cheat. Win-win.

Exes should be treated like vaporware: You can let people know you have them, but beyond that, they don’t exist. This holds for men and women, but for different reasons. It’s difficult for men to be “””friends””” with exes because nearly every man retains a desire to tap that ass one more time. That feeling won’t go away until the day he sees that his ex has gone post-Wall. Unfortunately for most men, exes don’t want sex with them. This is because women initiate the majority of relationship break-ups. So being a “””friend””” with a female ex is apt to lead to psychological torment and beta orbiting blue balls for non-alpha men.

Women don’t necessarily want another go at exes, but of the exes they’ll continue contacting it’s a good bet they’re thinking of extracockicular activity. Therefore, regard with a wary eye any woman you’re dating who claims to be on exceedingly friendly terms with an ex.

The rule for men in relationships: Contact with an ex should continue only if either of these two conditions is met:

1. You know the ex still wants you, and sex-on-the-side is logistically favorable.

2. You have children with the ex.

The rule for women in relationships: There should be no contact with any exes, unless the ex is John Scalzi and thus presents no sexual threat. Or, like with men, your ex and you share children.

Now that we know the rules of the game, let’s attend to the reader’s question.

First, you’re right to dump this girl. She’s got the red flags of whoredom planted in every orifice, lying being the most obvious tell of her possible present and certain future infidelity. But a perfunctory dumping is just so… anti-climactic. You want more bang for your headfuck. Remember, your beef isn’t with your girlfriend’s ex as much as it is with your girlfriend, so target your firepower on her. As the sexual gatekeepers, women should always be held the more responsible party for any illicit dalliances they undertake.

(I know that last line stuck in feminist craw. Because it’s true.)

What you want to avoid is a “let’s you and him fight” situation where your girlfriend fortuitously gets to enjoy two men blustering and posturing for her tawdry benefit. That means don’t aggressively confront her ex. Here’s my suggestion:

When you’re introduced to the ex, lead with, “I’ve heard so much about you.” Doesn’t matter if it’s true. (It’s better if false.) Watch your girlfriend’s reaction. If she hadn’t told you anything about him, she’ll become perceptibly uncomfortable. Savor these few seconds with a smile so broad she’ll think you’re guarding a Fort Knox stash of secrets about her.

Nervous chit chat will follow. Lean in like you’re about to tell the two of them (or three of them if his GF is also part of the group) a dirty secret of your own, then say “Hey, I was going to keep this between me and you [look at your GF], but [her ex] wouldn’t mind hearing this.” Your smile should now be reaching Joker proportions.

You say, “I saw my ex here, and she is crazy. She loves taking me for a ride.” Hold it, hoooooold it. Look at the ex. “You know what I mean? Anyhow, could you guys just kinda circle around me so maybe she doesn’t see me? If she comes over, pretend like we’re in deep conversation. Christ, I may need to bolt.”

Then they’ll chime in with something, it’s irrelevant. All you’re doing is extracting the id from your girlfriend’s ego bunker and forcing it to manifest in the awkward contortions of her face. You want to savor that crimson blush, her foot shuffling, and her attempts to cut off the conversation with feeble excuses. This is your one act play, and you will make it count.

Continue. “How close are you two? Can I trust you alone together? Haha, just busting your chops. I’ve gotta go, babe. Do you mind if I leave you here with [her ex]? No hanky panky, all right?” Finish it with a coup de grace shit-eating grin.

At this juncture, anything can happen. She might slink away disgracefully and meekly request she join your departure. Or, more likely, she’ll be experiencing something akin to septic shock, and stand there like a dummy, trying to make sense of her cratering bowels. Whatever you do in response, DON’T let on that you know the score. Pretend ignorance. This whole circus depends on plausible deniability and soul-shivving ambiguity. You’re not starting a fight with your girlfriend; you’re starting a fight *within* your girlfriend.

All will become clear to her in a few days time when she hasn’t gotten a single call or text from you. Relish the thought of her paranoia.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Game, Girls, Inner Beauty, Reader Mailbag, Rules of Manhood | 212 Comments

212 Responses

  1. on February 6, 2014 at 12:39 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

    lzozozozolzol

    HEY HEATEIETSTEZZ!!!

    da same thing happens to da GBFM ALL DA TIMEZ:

    GBFM writes,

    Urgent advice requested, there’s an opportunity for mischief in outing a liar. Bare-bones summary: 6 months dating a flaming s–t (far too long, I know, but the sex is great), going to a big bday party with her tomorrow.

    She says there are no exes coming and she hasn’t hooked up with any of the men who are gonna be there–but from a quick perusal of her computer it’s clear she’s f—d at least forty-two of them (a few weeks before meeting me) and been buttcocked by at least twcie as many, and engaged in bukkake gangbanging with around 143 of them, including 73 guys who have girlfriends (and cheated on her with my s–t girlfriend) so it’s like their dirty little secret. “This is between me and you, and the 42 other ganbangers right?” he wrote to her, when she offered him “a ride”. She still keeps in touch with him, texting him stuff like “hey dude what’s going on with you” etc. and butthetxing with him during lunch hours. That to me was the death knell of our hooking up–I don’t even want her as a bukkake-buddy. She lied that she didn’t keep in touch with exes.

    67 of the guys will most likely be at the party with their 73 girlfriends, and I’ll be introduced to them all. I’d like to amuse myself by watching her hamster spin. I want to take a dump on her face soon. I might even wink at the 67s guy and insinuate subtly that I know. Any advice on how to f–k with her/his heads? For fun of course!

    Patiently awaiting your advice–da GBFM.

    zlozozozolzololzolzolzolzozooozozo

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 2:09 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      when da gbfm is at da party
      and he comes back from da men’s room
      to find his girlfriend talking to her ex
      da gbfm walks up to them and says

      “hey man, i don’t mind sharing, if you don’t mind going second.”

      they both look at him, aghast.

      “so all i ask is that before you hook up with her,” da gbfm says to the dude, “you hook up with me.”

      they stand in stunned silence.

      “oh ok, my lotsas cockas in big demand 2nite. let’s see you and her fight for da right 2 ride me all night.”

      the dude excuses himself.

      i do her a couple more times that night, and go back o reading da GReta Books 4 menz like Homer/Virgilz /dAbntes Dantes.

      she texts me a couple weeks later after I fail to respond:

      where you been???

      da gbfm text back: “sry been getging more into dante den ur panties lzozozoz”

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 4:25 pm pulsotic

        So what’s your deal with Tucker Max? From the press on him it seems like he’s an alpha dude doin what he wants by using asshole game.

        Or is that why you don’t like him?

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 4:41 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozo

        he butthextettesz girltzh and tapes it secrtetly.

        is dat what u do?

        or do u only butthetx dudesz and tape it secretly?

        is dat da source of your butthurtness angst?

        zlzlzlolzz

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 11:48 am pulsotic

        Haha, no. I was just curious. Is that the only thing or is there anything else you disapprove of concerning him.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 2:56 pm Opus

      Now that is genuinely funny.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 3:01 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzozozozlzzlzlo i tink dat it is more generally reflective of da times in which we livez zlzlzooz

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 7:30 pm Zombie Shane

        > ““This is between me and you, right?” he wrote to her, when she offered him “a ride”. She still keeps in touch with him, texting him stuff like “hey dude what’s going on with you” etc. That to me was the death knell of our hooking up–I don’t even want her as a f-buddy.”

        All of this fornicating.

        And no live births.

        Death. Of. Civilization.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 10:14 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        yes
        the pill
        transformsz da gina
        into and infertile
        bungholizlzzhozzlzizolzzizlzop
        lzlzolzlzozolzz

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 5:34 am Zombie Shane

        You know, that’s exactly what it does.

        If a bitch is on the Pill, then it really doesn’t matter whether you’re taking her vaginally or anally – either way, it’s just a purposeless waste of your seed.

        You know, the more I think about it, the more I wonder whether this could contribute to the rise in homosexuality.

        Or at least to the rise in on-the-down-low bisexuality.

        Whether, because of the Pill, these post-modern post-religious post-common-sense yuppie/hipster fucktards start to associate vaginal sex with purposelesss acts of nihilism, and so maybe they begin to think to themselves, “Hey, I could just as well be dumping my seed in my homeboy’s ass, and then I wouldn’t have to deal with all the whining and bitching and moaning and mood-swings and bad-hair-days that I have to put up with from my girlfriend.”

        Because – let’s be honest with ourselves here – the prospect of having children with a woman is THE ONE AND ONLY reason to put up with all the whining and bitching and moaning and mood-swings and bad-hair-days.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 11:14 am Nicole

        OMG a couple of dudes here are starting to get it.

        Brought a tear to my eye, this.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 9:11 am gcm

        And the death of civilization is directly attributed to Gamers who ironically lure women with boyfriends/husbands to seed their faces, yet cast away females they are dating when they realize they are maintaining lines of open communication with former beaus.

        “If you’re right, you dump a cheater. If you’re wrong, you dump a drama queen who loves to mentally cheat.”

        Lose-lose for humanity.

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 8:43 am Zombie Shane

      SCHOOL OFFICIALS PROTECT “ALPHA” FOOTBALL STAR, SUSPEND “BETA” CLASS PRESIDENT:

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3120318/posts

      “Dominic Conti, 17, was suspended from school for five days following an incident at a football game last October 11. He reportedly confronted — and got into an altercation — with a football player he accused of sexually harassing his 15-year-old sister, a freshman at the school.

      Conti, until his suspension, was also the school’s senior class president. That position was taken away after his suspension…

      …She said a football player, who had been saying vulgar things to her, did it again on the night of Oct. 11 — for the third time.

      “He begins asking me to do things to his private parts — many things to his private parts – and I begin to tell him no and I would never, ever do that,” said Dominic’s sister…”

      LikeLike


  2. on February 6, 2014 at 12:43 pm Larry

    I was in a relationship where i put up with that bullshit deal that girls do about “talking to their exes.”

    “we are just friends.”
    “You can’t be friends with your ex?”
    “Why dont’ you trust me?”
    “Why are you insecure?”
    “Nobody in the past has had an issue with me talking to exes!”

    blah blah blah.

    Never ever never ever never ever again. It’s such a waste of time to try to explain it. It’s a nuclear option on the relationship. Chicks i’m banging now bring up their exes and i just ignore it with a “fart” or “did you see that on the tv.” Knowing that if they start talking to them…it’s essentially over, so what does it matter.

    Women are idiots.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 12:51 pm Grim

      GBFM’s one cock rule.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 12:55 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        yAHAHA!!!

        DA GBFMS ONE. COCK. RULE!

        (not to be codfused iwth da GBFM”S COCK–ONE COCK 2 RULE THEM ALL! zlolzozolzlozlozl

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 1:05 pm Grim

        See this vid has about 3,000 views. That’s what makes me think (sadly) that CH has less than 5,000 regular readers. Not just the twitter subs.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 1:12 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Herman Melville had far less leaders than that.

        Heartistesztzt does not count da number of his readersz, but rather da size of der soulsz.

        More lostsasz cokasz read HEarstsietz dan de entier monosphere combinedsz zlzozoizzlzoz

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 1:35 pm Grim

        Thank you for that bit of optimism. Seriously.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 2:12 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        both socrates and jesus were put to death, before churches and universities were built in their honor.

        dalrock has already hinted at rounding up his frankfurtian followers to crucify heartsitetz so that he can claim game as his own for his new church/cult.

        he’s calling hearsteitsstz a big sinner, as preparation, just as the scribes and pharisees called jesus a sinner for speaking the truth whihc sets us free, before curcifiying him so they could buttehxt his Trutsh llooolzozlz.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 4:31 pm pulsotic

        That’s cuz not everyone wants to watch YouTube vids on their phone cuz it takes too long to load and the payoff is usually weak. And if we watched every video GBFM posted then we wouldn’t get any work done.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 5:59 pm Mofo

        I never watch linked videos but read CH religiously. I figure if it is significant the context will come out in the discussion. Videos are for women, words are for men.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 11:53 pm mmmmhmmmmm

        You haven’t lived till you see gbfm wiith a severe case of auto tune.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 5:47 am Zombie Shane

        Several points:

        1) Do views of embedded videos receive the same offical count as views of videos directly from JewToob itself?

        2) 5000 is better than 500 is better than 50 is better than 5 is better than ZERO.

        3) If we really did have 5000 regular readers, of the intellectual and moral and spiritual quality of most of the dudes who comment here on a regular basis, then – if properly* organized – we could mount a rebellion and seize control of this country in a matter of weeks.

        *Where there is a strong emphasis on “PROPERLY”.

        By contrast, there are some really stoopid ways to organize which would allow the YKWs and the Sodomites and the Mossad and their NSA/CIA subsidiaries to take us all out overnight with nothing more than a relatively small fleet of drones.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 11:47 am Mob Barley

        Just the thought of 5,000 heartiste readers banding together in person for anything… Lol it would be fuckin awesome.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 12:05 pm pulsotic

        Rebellion? ! The only thing I’m mounting is sluts. But good luck with that.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 12:10 pm darkhorse

        Just stop.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 4:40 pm FamilyMan

        Someone ought to market a home defense drone, an anti-drone drone. It would detect and attack anything moving (not stationary objects, only moving ones) at an elevation more than 3 feet in the air. Attack could be done by a laser carried on your drone. Laser has the advantage it can be light and it doesn’t create a recoil.

        I think the strong-enough lasers are regulated though. The drones aren’t but the lasers are. Gotta think some more about this.

        Or the drone could use a weaker (unregulated) laser to designate a target for your ground-based guided missile, like a Stinger, but now this is getting expensive, and are we allowed to own guided missiles? (The correct interpretation of the 2nd Amendment says we are, especially for this properly organized i.e. well regulated militia work, but we aren’t even allowed AR15’s so the 2nd Amendment may not be enough.) The designation part can probably be done for under $2000 completely legally.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 1:22 am finndistan

        my experiences with my exes brought me to you….
        /makes me appreciate you
        /made me the woman I am

        The stomach of a man is unforgiving when he sees that distinct very subtle greeting between the girl he is holding hands with and the man who walks by.

        “Who are you to judge?”

        I am the One Cock.

        LikeLike


  3. on February 6, 2014 at 12:48 pm Wrecked 'Em

    The best way to drop someone who’s earned your disgust is to make sure that there’s no closure… simply don’t call or text, ever. It burns.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 12:57 pm Grim

      That is good advice and is, of course, what women do to betas when blowing them off. Even though the beta didn’t do anything horrible that warrants “disgust,” as a man would view the world–in fact what he did was be TOO NICE and polite and needy towards her–we know that indeed women are disgusted by beta.

      Even my beta self is getting better at this. It’s the idea of acting like hot women act towards us, which is really just a non-scarcity mentality that is a hot young woman’s reality. Even though I have gotten blown off much more than I have blown off women, lately I have had more than a few situations where I legitimately was the one less interested (not interested) in the woman (due to gross face) and I just stopped texting them or didn’t text them at all after the one and only meeting (met them online, admittedly beta). I figure that is what they deserve for misrepresenting themselves (the most recent example was another extreme butterface–rockin’ body but she is OLD and I think lied about her age by about 7 years) and they are simply being treated the way 100 women have treated me.

      And yes, silence/disappearance is IMO the cruelest/shivviest way to dump or reject someone. Total indifference.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 2:01 pm Charlie Dont Surf

      Two things:
      Women invent closure: They’ll simply rationalize something – no matter how unrealistic – to assign blame on a man. And; Radio Silence is not consistently practiced – Her Ex is a speed-dial away – and any reply from him – satisfies her ego.

      I’d nourish the germ of the idea with the Ex that she’s a heavy-rotation party girl with LOTS of secrets. Wink-wink-nudge-nudge say no more. And – Once her ego support structure is compromised – dump her anyway which most satisfies you … She’ll implode under the weight of combined indifference.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 2:58 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

        I’d keep fucking her while totally picking up another more trustworthy girl.

        I’d get her more invested physically and emotionally without investing anything in her. The more she invests, the more she’ll burn when I split. Muhahaha.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 4:23 pm Charlie Dont Surf

        … and the more your cock will burn when you pee.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 5:04 pm FamilyMan

        This. And wear a rubber, you don’t want her coming after you for paternity after you go cold on her.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 3:34 pm El Bastardo

      True. This Heartiste classic is the greatest I have ever heard.

      And lays the foundation for the rest of her life living in fidelity with you no where to be seen. I love it.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 4:04 pm Matthew

      Outcome independence includes the outcome of the other. Otherwise you’re still just as fused.

      LikeLike


  4. on February 6, 2014 at 12:51 pm Amy

    Well, there’s obviously nothing between those two but sex anyway, so of course it’s suspicious they text each other. And it’s just disrespectful.

    Still, a real ex who is a friend and no sexual threat is different.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 1:21 pm Grim

      The only way an ex girlfriend would be an ex boyfriend’s friend is if the ex boyfriend is alpha and he did the dumping and the woman still has feelings or respect for him, which is bad for the current BF. I know this to be a fact as a beta chump. When the girl does the dumping because the ex BF is beta, the woman is DISGUSTED by the man and never wants to see him again and won’t be friends. I bet you’d even agree with me. Give us some personal anecdotes. You’re going to tell us you have ex-lovers who you are now platonic friends with. Think about it — did they dump you and/or they are alphas and it was a YaReallyish agreed fuck buddy situation, or were they beta and you dumped them.

      In other words, I doubt you are friends with any ex BF who turned out to be beta and you dumped him. You loathe him for tricking you into thinking he was alpha enough before his beta revealed itself. That’s how my ex GF thinks about me. I know she is REPULSED by me the same as she would be if a roach was crawling on her, because I faked being alpha enough in the beginning to lure her into an LTR, but then I was beta, got dumped, and she will never let me hear her voice again.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 1:41 pm anonYmous

        agreed, well said. Nothing drys up a vag faster then beta behavior. It doesn’t matter what a womans age or status is, if shes 45 with 5 bastard spawn running around, or *aghem* 18 working at starbucks. never be beta. If you are beta and a woman is around you be assured she is not doing it for noble reasons.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 3:06 pm Amy

        “The only way an ex girlfriend would be an ex boyfriend’s friend is if the ex boyfriend is alpha and he did the dumping and the woman still has feelings or respect for him, which is bad for the current BF. ”

        Grim, this is usually true. I’m not trying to split hairs, I was just trying to point out that it’s critical that the ex be “no sexual threat”. In your scenario the ex is a sexual threat. In my own scenario he isn’t (alpha but semi-mutual breakup) and yes, I still have affection and respect for him. Which means we generally keep in touch. No, I’m not going to hang out with him or text daily, etc. even if I wanted to, it’s disrespectful. Agreed.

        I have one “beta” ex I broke up with and no, I don’t loathe him. He pulled some crap when we broke up and I was angry for a little while, now I’m friendly when I see him. We don’t otherwise keep in touch. And that’s not because I hate him, it’s because it wouldn’t be good for him. I’m sure he agrees.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 4:31 pm MT

        This is so painfully true and explains a lot about why I would not want to see my most recent ex EVER again. Now I understand why I felt that way about him (I broke up with him) and not others before him who had kept me at a distance and denied me any real commitment (essentially breaking up with me.)

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 4:54 pm Charlie Dont Surf

        I’d never want to be a member of a club that would have me as one of its members.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 4:55 pm Grim

        Not something to be proud of woman. That’s the point.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 1:19 pm Anonymous

        How do you feel about the guys who never committed and essentially made you break up with them now? Still attracted but guarded/pissed? Got the boot for that, agreed, and now im banging her friend. She bites at every little bit of attention I give her…

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 5:06 pm FamilyMan

        Women can’t control and don’t even understand their own “vaginal” impulses until we explain them to you.

        That doesn’t mean we won’t hold you accountable, in this era of female empowerment and accountability.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 1:35 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

      Spoken like a true hamstring

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 2:21 pm Amy

        Lol. I’m a large tendon? I think I’d rather be a gerbil.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 2:42 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

        Charming.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 2:43 pm Grim

        What’s my answer, Amy? I’m not even trying to be mean. I’m thinking you’ll have a “you know-he’s right!” moment when you think about this. Are all the former lovers with whom you are now “just friends” alpha types who either dumped you or it was a mutual split but he was not a butthurt pathetic beta because he was/is a man with other options/plates?

        Or, stated in the other direction, are any of your former lovers with whom you are now friends betas who you dumped?

        I’m guessing the answer to the first questions is yes and to the second, no. Because you are repulsed by any beta you (accidentally) let have sex with you. You resent and hate him for tricking you.

        Am I right?

        Remember…we’re not talking about beta orbiter friends. We are talking about any male friends who you used to have sex with.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 10:02 am Charlie Dont Surf

        Knock it off, Grim

        Women have a Monkey’s Appetite: Give a monkey an apple, it wants a banana, give it a banana – it wants a peach …

        So, here they are – picking up a new vernacular – terms like ‘butt-hurt pathetic beta’ – to amaze and appall their girlfriends – and rationalize failed relationships. And you’re making it happen.

        Their “you know-he’s right” moment won’t last a minute before the monkey is looking for option #3. That little critter can’t be cornered by logic.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 4:34 pm FuriousFerret

        ‘Spoken like a true hamstring’

        How the hell did you mess up ‘hamster’ with ‘hamstring’?

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 5:49 pm Matthew King

        Autocuntplete.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 10:22 am Greg Eliot

        I’m sure that wasn’t what he was intendon.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 10:59 am Amy

        Maybe, but I think it’s a stretch.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 11:15 am Grim

        lol you pulled that off nicely Amy. I want to pull your hair with deep devotion. (How deep?) At least as deep as the Pacific Ocean. zlzolzozlzo

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 11:56 am Mob Barley

        Holy Molly people here got jokes. I love this site.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 2:45 pm Scray

      If she’s into you, she won’t want to be around her ex’s or any of her other male friends that are in any way attractive. She knows it’s disrespectful.

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 2:46 pm Amy

        Agreed.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 6:48 pm anonYmous

        True, if a woman was really into you there would almost be a small amount of fear in her day to day living not to do anything to upset you or get you to leave. And the tiny amount of fear multiplies the tingles heh.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 10:01 am JB

        You need to define “into you.” If you’re as alpha as she can ever hope to fuck and you’re in a long term relationship with her, then yes, this is how it works.

        Heck I even know an alpha who loves to swing with his wife. So it doesn’t always work even then. But this is not a common situation. It’s common for a woman to see two men: It’s common for a woman to really care about one man and be fucking another — sometimes they’re both betas because that’s the best she can get. I’ve also seen women who fucked two alphas because she knows neither will commit. It’s not common, but it happens. I’ve seen it all. If you keep your eyes open and learn to read people, you won’t believe the shit you will discover.

        And you will stop believing in both the cathedral’s shit and the old fashioned shit about women being good and only wanting to be loved by one man.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 11:04 am Charlie Dont Surf

        There was a moment last night, when she was sandwiched between the two Finnish dwarves and the Maori tribesmen, where I thought, ‘Wow, I could really spend the rest of my life with this woman’.

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 4:05 pm Matthew

      “a real ex who is a friend and no sexual threat is different”

      Pink, nerve-gas-farting dragons are also different.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 6:03 am Mob Barley

        NA-EXALT…amy

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 10:23 am Greg Eliot

        Amy needs her usual session with Gas Buttox.

        LikeLike


  5. on February 6, 2014 at 12:55 pm Anonymous

    need text advice, got a girls number off tinder

    text her last nite and got no response

    anything i can do from here other than a non sequiter somewhere down the line?

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 1:37 pm Waffles

      Just forget it, nothing good will come from sending anything else before she responds. Non sequiter only has value if she’s responded before.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 2:43 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

      No reply on text means either not enough attraction or not enough comfort post attraction establishment. Which one was it?

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 5:11 pm Anonymous

        probably not enough comfort, i got the number pretty quickly after bout 5 exchanges and didnt text till 5 days later

        next time it might be better to text her instantly after i get the number and keep the chat going

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 4:52 am Cad and Bounder

        There is only one thing you can do, follow up with ellipses.

        In fact, I’d wager that this is where the ‘ellipses game’ started off from.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 6:35 am Anonymous

        ellipses is not a bad idea actually

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 7:36 am Anonymous

        shes just after replying 2 days later apoligising for not replying sooner lol

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 11:53 am Cad and Bounder

        Don’t reply immediately. Never take a woman’s word a face value. Make her wait. Hold your frame.

        LikeLike


  6. on February 6, 2014 at 12:55 pm medicalfetish4you

    Keep her as a fuck toy!

    But, don’t you dare ever let her think that you care for her at all!

    Use her like the fuckin’ slut that she is. She takes it deep up the ass, cause that’s what I enjoy.

    Then, tell her what a filthy dirty slut she is, and how she will never be any sort of a faithful girlfriend to any man.

    “What? You can’t keep your legs shut for 20 minutes, when I’m gone! Why would I ever expend a single moment of love or affection on a slut like you?”

    What you really have there is not a sex-fiend girl, of course.

    She insecure and needy and wants to know that every man is wildly attracted to her. Inside, she feels unloved and unwanted, probably from childhood issues.

    That’s her life. She will always search for men who make her feel wanted.

    You can’t trust her to be failthful.

    I feel sorry for the woman. But, she is too needy to be trusted.

    The ONLY way to keep her is to be her worst fear. She is not loved. She is not needed. She is never good enough.

    She will fuck herself to death trying to gain some approval from you. All in vain, of course.

    Ten years later, still a stupid slut who gets it deep up the ass, is all she ever would be to me!

    LikeLike


  7. on February 6, 2014 at 12:55 pm Lucky White Male

    This advice is so powerful that a man who executes it will not only get revenge …. but will probably bring the ex crawling back to him

    What girl could resist this kind of devil may care head-fuckery?

    If you operated like this before the breakup, there would be no breakup to worry about

    CH: A ruthless man for ruthless times

    LikeLike


  8. on February 6, 2014 at 1:09 pm ram32

    HAHAHA omfg this was awesome soul-shivving at its best

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 8:03 pm Anonymous

      motherfucking awesome

      LikeLike


  9. on February 6, 2014 at 1:10 pm Preston

    Women crave closure. A direct or emotional breakup is to your grievous disadvantage and far less painful for her than an abrupt, aloof disconnect. From what it sounds like, she deserves the latter.

    Even after she realizes what happened, her mind will still be heavy with the weight of unanswered questions. Keep the hamster spinning for eternity.

    LikeLike


  10. on February 6, 2014 at 1:10 pm Tilikum

    “You’re not starting a fight with your girlfriend; you’re starting a fight *within* your girlfriend.”

    very well put.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 1:44 am Rick250

      Yeah. that is great.

      Also, I think it was Patriarch that had some good advice about the above scenerio if i can remember it:

      1. The dude is not an alpha if he hasnt moved on to pursue and obtain other pussy.. so he is a beta, not to your caliber, DLV, and hence not to be viewed up to your standard or as much of a threat.
      2. You give her a new secret.

      You brush off the whole ‘meeting the ex event’ like you couldnt care less; then take her home and degrade her sexually. Intensely. Its a win win situation for you as you cum all over her face (or whatever you think is necessary) and implant a new secret in her head that surpasses her old one with him. In the future your new secret will be forever connected to the ex in your mind and your slut gf’s.

      LikeLike


  11. on February 6, 2014 at 1:15 pm tteclod

    Not feeling this not of “advice.”

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 1:16 pm tteclod

      bit of

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 2:30 pm Ryan Vann

        Cool story…

        LikeLike


  12. on February 6, 2014 at 1:20 pm JP

    Caution about reading emails or texts…Trial starts tomorrow…

    A Michigan man who accessed his wife’s e-mail account while she was allegedly carrying on an affair faces up to five years in prison when he goes on trial Feb. 7 on a charge he violated a state law typically used against hackers intent on making money or mayhem.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 1:28 pm Preston

      Interesting. Lessons learned include

      1) maintain ambiguity
      2) try not to get married to a woman who has been divorced twice before
      3) continually change your own cellphone password when in a LTR

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 11:06 am corvinus

        2) try not to get married to a woman who has been divorced twice before

        Oh, one of those, huh? (facepalm)

        LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 2:12 pm everybodyhatesscott

      http://www.freep.com/article/20120713/NEWS03/120713065/email-snooping-felony-charge-dismissed

      That guy was an idiot too. Never talk to the police.

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 12:56 am Moses

      Years ago I caught a woman cheating on me by going through her email after she closed the tab and the browser remained logged into her email. I thanked my lucky stars because I was actually thinking of marrying this girl.

      I confronted her without letting her know I had evidence. She put on an astonishing Oscar-worthy show of denial, crying and professing her love to me. I showed her the door. If I hadn’t had hard evidence her performance probably would have swayed me.

      I learned that women are naturally gifted liars and emotional manipulators. I also learned that confronting a woman without hard evidence that seals her guilt is pointless. If you really like her she will sway you.

      After that I let go of any moral issue regarding any actions necessary to learn what kind of a woman I was dealing with. The stakes are simply too great to get involved seriously with a lying slut.

      Before getting married I did, ahem, thorough due diligence on my then-GF. She was totally clean, even telling ex BFs pining for her to get lost. As Reagan said — “Trust, but verify.”

      LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2014 at 10:28 am JustG

        I’ve done the same thing with my boyfriend.
        And he had that same gift of Oscar winning performance (only I could see right through it then, and THEN I perused his open email)
        Men and women keep exes around for very few reasons. None of them honorable…

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 11:13 am CT

      Wow. So when it comes to transferring a mans resources to a woman after marriage it’s community property. But when he looks at an email account, that’s a part off the community property, it’s a crime.
      Sucks for this guy, and sucks even more he would be married to a wench that would let this get any traction with the states attorney.

      LikeLike


  13. on February 6, 2014 at 1:29 pm AlphaBeta

    “You’re not starting a fight with your girlfriend; you’re starting a fight *within* your girlfriend.”

    This should be a maxim or some such

    LikeLike


  14. on February 6, 2014 at 1:31 pm anonYmous

    The best thing to do with damning information is nothing. Its better to use it to make a clean break, or use it to develop an exit strategy. Confronting a cheating slut with damning information will not fix anything because she already doesnt care about you, there is no upside to it. Use the time to start moving your stuff into a storage or getting a new apartment, securing your assets, scheduling utilities to be shut off, basically preparing to leave her high and dry. After you got your affairs(heh) in order, then you can commence slut shaming. The best way is using the blitzkrieg method. Compile loads of information on her, and send it to everyone. A one time attack then retreat to the sanctum of your castle. She will spend most of the time cleaning up after the attack, to really go after you. The easiest way to compile information is from a cell phone bill. Or you can even install a backup program on her cell that backs up information onto a gmail account, that you have access to. Then I would set up a forward on that gmail account to another account. I caught an x of mine a long time ago on the computer of mine, i had a screenshot program so the proof was irrefutable. Since it was my computer it is legal. When I caught her in the lie she just laughed at me. The other stuff might not be so legal. There are also twitter programs that you can put on fones that tweet their current location every 15mins or so and run in the background. A lot of you think im paranoid. And that I am a pos for checking up on my gf’s. I will tell you this. The amount of money it has saved me in my life is incalculable. Women are not so innocent, some of the stuff ive stumbled onto in life is just plain disgusting, trust no woman.

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 4:07 pm Matthew

      But did you get back your Swingline stapler?

      LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 4:20 pm anonYmous

        No but I burned her house down.

        LikeLike


      • on February 6, 2014 at 7:27 pm Matthew

        Desperate times.

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 6:16 am Mob Barley

      It’s mr al quieda. Long time no paranoia, how you’ve been.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:19 pm anonYmous

        Oh you know chillin… Those fuel air bombs are 10x louder when im shooting jihadist videos in caves.

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 10:57 am Amy

      Can Madame Obvious just point out that dating a slut means there’s a high probability that she’ll act like one? Seems a little odd everyone is shocked by this and wants to punish her for it.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 1:57 pm FamilyMan

        Fair enough but the feminists hate your guts for this comment. It means girls on the carousel can’t be reformed.

        LikeLike


  15. on February 6, 2014 at 1:47 pm Waffles

    THE WALL is creeping up faster and faster on these chicks. I swear. The pre-30 wall has overtaken many previously bangable babes. As for exes, there is really no reason to remain friends or in contact.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 9:17 am Tilikum

      booze and cigs. and weed

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 11:05 am corvinus

      I suspect that sluts hit the wall earlier and harder than non-sluts.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 12:00 pm Mob Barley

        Of course. Cars with more mileage would break down sooner.

        LikeLike


  16. on February 6, 2014 at 1:47 pm Holden Caulfield

    Great advice.

    “Your smile should now be reaching Joker proportions.” Genius way of putting it. There should be no way to hold back that shit eating grin if you follow the CH advice as laid out above.

    LikeLike


  17. on February 6, 2014 at 1:47 pm Hugh Mann

    o/t, may have been posted before – 22st girl out in bar, drunk guy tells her she’s disgusting and throws drink over her (not the act of a gentleman)

    But … she’s lost 10 stone and still counting

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2552110/Look-state-Youre-disgusting-Women-loses-10-stone-humiliated-man-threw-drink-night-size.html

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 2:33 pm Dr Caveman

      Proof: fat shaming works

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 4:08 pm Matthew

      Still unhittable, though.

      LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 8:06 pm AlmostAnonymous

      For an English chick, she’s actually made herself attractive. She still needs to lose more weight though.

      Read through the comments, too many of them are “but you were beautiful before” type.

      Yeeech.

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 5:05 am Cad and Bounder

      Now let’s a newspaper article, just one, whereby a whale thanks a feminist or an MSM liar for ‘educating her’ that she can be put on weight and feel better about herself, and her life.

      Since there are no shortage of takers for dispensing advice to women on the subject of ‘big is beautiful’, surely they can come up with one. Just one. Anyone?

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 1:58 pm FamilyMan

        Excellent. Indeed the feminists don’t like each other, they are just a cauldron of women each nursing her own individual grievances.

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 11:05 am corvinus

      The fellow who told her she was disgusting should get a Golden Balls Award. If only more English dudes were like that.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 6:50 am blogster

      The hamster is strong with this one. This in tandem with the complete lack of understanding of cause and effect, based on biological realities, is typical.

      “Steph said: ‘I thought that if no one saw me doing it, then I hadn’t done it, which is never a good way to be.”

      Yes because a tree falling the woods doesn’t make a sound if no-one is around. However I suspect if she fell over at the peak of her fatness, people across the Atlantic would hear.

      “Steph said: I met Neil towards the end of my diet and we’ve been together about seven months. The relationship wouldn’t have worked before I don’t think. I would have constantly been wondering why he was interested in me.”

      He wouldn’t have been interested in the first place. If he had, EVERYONE would be wondering why, not just you. She subconsciously understands he wouldn’t have been interested because she was fat but fails to see or does not want to acknowledge that he opportunistically swooped in when she was more healthy. Then complains about being judged:

      “She says: ‘People used to look at me and judge me. They were looking down on me because I was young and overweight. ‘Now, people will hold a door open for me. It sounds silly but that was something that wouldn’t have happened before”

      Yes, how dare they assess that you have weak character, lack self esteem and have no self discipline. Instead, you should be revered and credited with the self mastery of Japanese Ronin.

      LikeLike


  18. on February 6, 2014 at 2:05 pm Anonymous

    I have to agree with the closure thing. I’ve dumped the same girl 4 times like that… I’m pretty sure she’ll still take me back.

    LikeLike


  19. on February 6, 2014 at 2:51 pm newbloxcity

    to be fair, homeboy didn’t do nothing to OPie but bang out a slut he’s still clinging to.

    that being said, the laws of divine karmic shivving dictate that OPie should mack the shit out of homies’ girl, should he have game enough (probably not given that he made cumdump his girl because he is too lazy to hunt)

    -this will play on said slut’s inner feelings of worthlessness for being passed over twice for this bitch and will ruin the magicks of their little tryst by demonstrating she is second rate via doubleblind study
    -this will also feed into BF guy’s competition anxiety/desire for the sweet nectar of beta security by reminding him what he leveraged his blissful companionship on is your LOLthrowaway
    (re: no ‘alpha’ getting side azz says “you sure yer gonna keep yer mouth shut slut?”, like da cunts gonna say “xtualy i wuz gonna tell her after i realize its pump&dump u got me!!1”)

    finish when shit-tested with “lolzlzol wut i was just taking her for a ride, i didn’t think anyone would get hurt from it”, drop the mic and walk out

    LikeLike


  20. on February 6, 2014 at 2:56 pm walawala

    Two points which I will share from my experience.

    I am in contact with two of my exes who have become quite good friends. But I broke up with them and they literally begged me to come back. Now we’re pals.

    We’re such good friends that my latest CRAZY ex was constantly jealous of any contact I had with her.

    But my CRAZY ex was jealous when the cleaning lady had a chat longer than 5 seconds with me.

    A guy in my social circle who is a beta shlump but everyone’s “uncle” asked me Crazy Ex for a birthday dinner at a quiet Italian restaurant. My ex didn’t tell me about it, I asked her then she mentioned it as though it was no big deal.

    But I knew this guy was sniffing around and she was trying the “let’s you and him fight”. I reamed her out. Then we broke up 2 weeks later so I knew that something was up.

    The minute some guy asks your girlfriend out and she accepts—no matter what the premise…you have to reassess.

    GIrls who are keen on you don’t do stupid shit that would destroy the relationship.

    The “Triangulation”: introduce a third element is a female tactic aimed at getting guys off-balance.

    Guys being “logical” will try to take this up with a girl who will never see things “that way”—unless of course it’s YOU going to dinner with an ex.

    Only a fucked up Cluster B Drama Queen would pull shit like this–not someone you want to stick around for. It only gets worse and worse.

    My ex who I believe is now seeing the birthday date guy called/wrote/messaged 20 times in a panic while I was on holiday telling me she was “very very worried” about me and asking where I was.

    Imagine being the other guy in this scenario?

    Him: “You called walawala up to see how he was!???” Why???”

    Her; I hadn’t heard from him….

    Him: Why would you need to be in touch, didn’t you tell me he was an asshole?

    Her blah blah blah illogical nonsense aimed at getting that guy off-balance and in better control.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 1:29 am Carlos Danger

      Why do you hang out with women who don’t give you pussy, especially if they are exes?

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 2:17 am walawala

        Social proof. They do stuff for me. They’re cute and they give me IOI’s in front of other women. I like them as people.

        I think the idea of hanging out with women makes you an orbiter…IF you’re not getting what you want or need.

        I don’t want to bang them even though I could.

        LikeLike


  21. on February 6, 2014 at 3:07 pm Wrecked 'Em

    This is because women initiate the majority of relationship break-ups.

    I’ve done the dumping in the vast, vast (“all but 2”) majority of my relationships… I wonder what that means.

    LikeLike


  22. on February 6, 2014 at 3:20 pm theasdgamer

    Off-topic: Saw this just now. http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/03/opinion/sutter-alaska-rape-list/index.html

    LikeLike


    • on February 6, 2014 at 7:35 pm Paulyester

      They’re all states with high Indian populations.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 6:06 am FamilyMan

        I guess there are Indians and then there are Indians …

        NY has a significant Indian population, they’ve blockaded the NY Thruway up in the Mohawk Valley over gaming issues. But NY has the second lowest rate of reported rapes.

        Until a couple years ago, NY did not have no-fault divorce. That could have caused more stable families and less rapes up until recently.

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 10:29 am Greg Eliot

      Rapes per 100K… it’s all a matter of low population… two rapes in AK is like 200 in CA.

      LikeLike


  23. on February 6, 2014 at 3:22 pm J. Belfort

    First off, you fucked up by having a relationship with this ho but eh, these cold months will make a man do crazy things. Anyway, here’s some advice:

    If the guy looks like a wimp or soft, keep banging her. Changes are, he doesn’t have much options so he’s just in orbit for a pity bang. Plus, he has a low chance of spreading any STDs since he probably doesn’t get a lot of play.

    If on the other hand, he looks and acts like he can handle other women, dump this bitch quickly. There’s a high chance that she will catch an STD and plant that fucker right onto you.

    I caught gonorrhea this way from a past fling. She was only a FWB but I knew she still kept in contact with her ex. I met the guy at a party before I banged her and he was smooth in general. He was also very extroverted. Like a coke fueled car salesman. I disregarded my instincts and I still went for her because she had dat ass.

    I banged that for a month and then that burning sensation came. I swear I wanted to ram her head into a wall…multiple times.

    But I do like heartiste’s advice, too. Sure It’s devilish in a way but that’s sometimes the funnest part of the game.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 1:13 pm FamilyMan

      I’m finding that this bad weather generally increases the affectionateness from my wife and reduces the severity of bad episodes. But there are the silly times she blames everyone else for the remaining problems she has.

      LikeLike


  24. on February 6, 2014 at 4:31 pm burke

    i do think the uncertainty really chews them up, but what she’s worried about is being outed as a slut, not losing you. if she cared she wouldn’t be keeping the home fires burning for someone else.

    so in my opinion, what she deserves is exactly what she fears. and you can do that without any confrontation at all. a million different ways, you can let the ex’s girlfriend know anonymously what’s going on, or gone on.

    the girl will take care of the confrontation at that point, you can stand back and watch the fireworks with all the deniability in the world. and you can also watch your ‘lady’ squirm as she tries to explain away the drama and continue denying what happened.

    yes, i have done it, yes there was a divorce, and yes she did try to play it off like nothing had happened with the guy.

    in general i would say just don’t value a girl enough that her cheating matters to you. because she probably does or would. there are girls that don’t, and you can see them a mile away. they’re worthwhile. but they might as well be unicorns.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 3:46 am Zombie Shane

      > “but what she’s worried about is being outed as a slut”

      In an earlier era, maybe.

      But there is going to come a time [and that time may have arrived already] when The Frankfurt School has so thoroughly pornified and sodomized and poisoned our culture that sluttery is worn as a badge of honor.

      Can you imagine what the conversation might look like?

      Say HB = “Hawt Babe” and “HD = Hot Dude”.

      YOU: “You filthy stinking slut, giving rides to any guy who asks.”

      HER: “Hey, I’m an HB8 on a bad hair day. I can fuck any guy I wanna fuck. You’re an HD5.5 on your best days. Whatta loser. Get outta my face. If you get near me again, I’ll take out a restraining order against you. And I’ll tell the judge that you’re a racist.”

      Granted, she’ll hit the wall someday, and then no one will give her the time of day, but she’s got five [or maybe ten] years in her prime during which a poisonous culture will encourage her to behave exactly like that.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 7:19 am burke

        i totally agree about the culture, but women themselves, no matter how much they want their depraved freedom to slut it up, will cut each other down for it. and i think that’s independent of culture, it’s just a female competitiveness thing, and so long as there are males of any quality, they will fight over them and slut-shaming will be their tool.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 11:03 am Zombie Shane

        > “and i think that’s independent of culture, …”

        But what if it’s NOT independent of culture?

        What if it DEPENDS on the culture?

        “…it’s just a female competitiveness thing…”

        The Frankfurt School has spent the last 100 years in America poisoning our culture with [among many other techniques] a pornification of everything.

        What if American women respond by trying to OUT-compete one another over who can be the biggest slut?

        There was a famous scene, towards the end of “I Claudius” [it was when the TV series had transitioned over to the book volume known as “Claudius the God”], where Claudius’s wife [Agrippina the Younger?] got into a fuck contest with a professional whore, to see who could fuck more Roman men in one setting without passing out from the pain of it all.

        What if the Frankfurt School succeeds in getting women to compete on that level?

        As I was saying above: Death. Of. Civilization.

        Which is precisely what the Frankfurt School is after here – the utter and complete destruction, annihilation, and eradication of Western Civilization.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 11:09 pm cortesar

        I believe that was Messalina
        Agrippina the Younger was next Claudius wife once Messalina was executed
        Agrippina manipulated Claudius in adapting her son Nero
        The rest is well known

        LikeLike


  25. on February 6, 2014 at 5:10 pm Mark

    CH’s advise is ok, but I like Charlie Don’t Surf and newbloxcity’s advice better.
    Charlie advised hinting to the ex about how slutty she is so that the ex no longer finds her attractive. This party is a great opportunity to do so. They could have a little private “guy small talk” while getting drinks or something where DragonfromCY (OP) can try out his actor’s skills, such as a cuck fetishist. He can say how much it “turns him on” knowing that his girlfriend is such a “sensual” woman who can seduce “so many” men and that OP loves to watch. He can go into as much detail as he wants about horrid acts with horrid men while pretending to be proud. Or he can take the route of asking for advise for how to deal with his slutty gf. Or complain about the STD she gave him. etc. Get the ex turned off so that he won’t give her validation again.
    newbloxcity’s advice was to game the ex’s new gf in front of OP’s cheating gf, that way making her think that 2 men of some importance in her life choose the same woman over her. Brilliant. Even better if the approach is fruitful, but just the attempt accomplishes the mission.
    So the 3 part plan:
    1 isolate her from an important validater/ orbiter by turning him off her
    2 hit on ex’s new gf in front of gf to make her feel inferior
    3 go ghost. no closure or hints that you hacked her computer, which could get you in hot water

    LikeLike


  26. on February 6, 2014 at 5:11 pm C

    Oh this is good advice. Evil as hell, but good at the same time 🙂

    LikeLike


  27. on February 6, 2014 at 5:18 pm Diogenes the Cynic

    Flirt with the girlfriend of the other guy.

    LikeLike


  28. on February 6, 2014 at 5:27 pm Zombie Shane

    > “Flirt with the girlfriend of the other guy.”

    That’s exactly what I was thinking about during the entire story.

    At least get her name and her number before you leave.

    LikeLike


  29. on February 6, 2014 at 6:05 pm Carlos Danger

    Good music tip and the irony is delicious. Hildegard von Bingen, the medieval nun and mystic. It’s all sung in Latin by mostly women who have voices of angels. It’s also surprisingly appealing to a modern ear. It could have been played in Black Hawk Down. You could play it at the coolest hipster party and they would all swoon over this awesome 3rd world band. All you good Catholics need to check it out. That means you Matt.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 7:39 am Knowbody

      What are you talking about?

      What band?

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 5:53 pm Carlos Danger

        Sequentia does the performances mostly.

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 9:01 am Diogenes the Cynic

      Great stuff:

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 4:10 pm Hugh Mann

      Sinfonye are also pretty good

      A dripping honeycomb
      was Ursula, virgin,
      who yearned to lie with
      God’s lamb,
      honey and milk beneath her tongue.

      LikeLike


  30. on February 6, 2014 at 7:14 pm philebus

    It’s an old established CH maxim that looks simply don’t matter in pickup. I’d like to point out one of the most extreme examples of I’ve seen of this: Andrew Dryden, a man who would probably be rated a 4 in the looks department by most women and looks like the IT guy at work, was in an LTR with Emily Ratajkowski, the ridiculous HB10 from the blurred lines video.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2553276/Blurred-Lines-beauty-Emily-Ratajkowski-splits-boyfriend-Andrew-Dryden.html

    http://le-21eme.com/tag/andrew-dryden/

    According to google he is a creative director and mensware buyer in LA. Is he rich? Maybe, but a girl like that could get a guy who is just as rich and looks like Brad Pitt. Is he famous? No.

    But looking through his pictures on that blog one can tell — this man is undoubtedly master of his own reality and probably has incredible game. I’d love to see him in action.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 11:02 am corvinus

      She’s also Slavic, and Slavic HB10s are somewhat more accessible for whatever reason.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 11:38 am darkhorse

        That’s not it. Indie scenester girl with more powerful scenester boyfriend.

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 11:36 am darkhorse

      this man is undoubtedly master of his own reality and probably has incredible game. I’d love to see him in action.

      She’s a downtown scenester kid looking up to an older, established creative male. It’s fairly common to see pairings of artists with a really strong sense of style with hot girls who are ensconced in the creative scene. True, these “muses” don’t go for looks. Master of his own reality, maybe. Incredible game, well, she left him when she got the fame she wanted. Can he pull outside his group? Undetermined.

      Beautiful girl. I think you’re hyping her up a little but with 10 status, but each to their own.

      LikeLike


  31. on February 6, 2014 at 8:29 pm Hello

    I see you’ve regressed ,Chateau. You came so close – reaching a local (though not global) peak and then turned around and went to where you were before. ANTI-NATALISM. Say it with me: “AN-TI-NA-TAL-IS-M.” That is the only logical step you have, unless you want to be a beta and run around in circles covering shit you’ve already covered.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 12:55 am L. Jon Hubbard

      Anti-natalism (as a “philosophy” (more like dysosophy) and not merely a personal preference) is a snake (preferably adequately aenesthetised) eating its tail.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 5:39 am Zombie Shane

        > “a snake… eating its tail…”

        There’s actually a word for that:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 5:53 am L. Jon Hubbard

        The symbol evokes eternal and semmingly paradoxical truth. To be specific what I mean by invoking it there: Philosophy requires intelligent beings, which requires birth and attendant suffering, therefore anti-natalism is a philosophy which, if followed everywhere, gets rid of philosophy for good. It’s like making a logical argument against using logic.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 7:26 am Zombie Shane

        > “It’s like making a logical argument against using logic.”

        Which, in turn, if it were possible, would be the quintessence of anti-Christianity:

        IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE LOGOS, AND THE LOGOS WAS WITH GOD, AND THE LOGOS WAS GOD.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logos_(Christianity)

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 9:13 am L. Jon Hubbard

        speaking of logic, you might want to look at the entries for begging the question, assuming the conclusion and non-sequitur.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 12:03 pm Zombie Shane

        Huh?

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 5:24 am L. Jon Hubbard

      “Subjectively unpleasant states of consciousness exist because they were genetically adaptive. Each of our core emotions had a distinct signalling role in our evolutionary past: they tended to promote behaviours which enhanced the inclusive fitness of our genes in the ancestral environment.

      So if manipulating our external environment alone can never abolish suffering and malaise, what does technically work?

      Here are three scenarios in ascending order of sociological plausibility:

      a) wireheading
      b) utopian designer drugs
      c) genetic engineering and – what I want to focus on – the impending reproductive revolution of designer babies”

      Read more: http://www.hedweb.com/abolitionist-project/index.html

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 8:32 am Hello

        Generation after generation that would suffer as people scratch and claw their way to implementing one of these solutions, none of wgich are guaranteed. Anti-natalism makes more sense, considering the present generation is all that would need to suffer.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:38 am L. Jon Hubbard

        We’re here for each other. Each other is what validates us. If there were noone else on the earth, I’d eventually get as nihilist as you are, even if I had some “synthetic cheese”.

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 5:45 am L. Jon Hubbard

      You anti-natalists are making me suffer by reminding me that dysphoria, endless suffering and zero-sum games are part and parcel of sentience. I wish you’d never been been born.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 9:47 am L. Jon Hubbard

        Aesthetics of an anti-natalist: “Art is a five-litre glass jar of elephant crap with a label, the fine print of which says, ‘a beetle was crushed under the weight of the contents herein, causing it to die an agonising death’ on it.”

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 8:28 am Hello

        Go ahead and make remarks like this. I just hope you remember to laugh when it’s you or someone you know are on your way out.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 9:24 am L. Jon Hubbard

        When I worked as a paramedic in a previous life (true story) a terminally ill repeat customer who would die in two days and I at his behest played a practical joke on a new-on-the-job colleague. I believe he would, were it his last day on earth, tell you to shove your anti-natalism up your ass.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 9:53 am Hello

        Common response. The ironic thing is that your day is coming. After you’ve completed chasing and eating the synthetic cheese that you claim validates your existence, you will be literally shitting out of your ass with the look every dying man has in his regretful face. Hope you’ll contend it was worth it then.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 10:58 am L. Jon Hubbard

        I need not “validate” my “existence”. I am. Nothing else matters, including me predicting you will not succeed stopping life. When I am no longer, from my (non-)perspective, it won’t matter.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:20 am L. Jon Hubbard

        I don’t get, though, why you would want me to suffer in death and come to your conclusions. If it’s really all pointless, what difference would it make to you if I die in my sleep after “eating synthetic chess” all day or after being tortured for days by a guy with a cordless drill and a blowtorch?

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 2:24 pm Hello

        1) You validate your existence with ego-boosting “accomplishments” just like every other person out there, me included (it’s just that I don’t proclaim it’s worth it given the suffering that occurs to myself and others along the way). Don’t lie to yourself and say inaccurately naive things like “I am.”
        2) I never said I wanted you to suffer in death. I’m telling you that it’s coming, so remember that you defended this pointless game, a game which can be summed up as “a manifestation of a DNA molecule that has gone through competitive evolution and acquired an eccentric psychology that allows it to delude itself into the idea that it is accomplishing something.” (Inmendham)

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 2:40 pm Hello

        Ultimately what’s disappointing, though not as important as the suffering, is the idiocy the supposed “alphas” engage in. Just chasing the cheese like everybody else, gobbling it up whenever they can get their hands on it, having that deluded smirk of accomplishment on their faces. It’s pathetic.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:35 am L. Jon Hubbard

        Would you like some synthetic cheese to go with your red herrings? It doesn’t matter who “validates” or invalidates being here. We’re here and we’re talking about it. Our children will be here after us and theirs after them. Nothing short of something killing everything here (and possibly everywhere else) can stop that. And then what?

        But you’re the only one who matters (seriously). When you’re gone, it will all be gone (i. e., won’t matter).

        If I thought you had young children, I’d ask you to ask them if they thought it should have been better had they never been born. I know already how mine feel about that — don’t need to ask them.

        For a nihilist, you sure are moralistic.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:06 am L. Jon Hubbard

        Meant to put this down here: Each other is what validates us — which is a strong argument for opposite of anti-natalism.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:22 am L. Jon Hubbard

        You must be European origin or heavily admixed, probably Nordic, I would say. There is no way an Arab, Negro, Subcon or Chinaman could care deep enough to come up with that kind of shit.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 3:09 pm Hello

        “If I thought you had young children, I’d ask you to ask them if they thought it should have been better had they never been born. I know already how mine feel about that — don’t need to ask them.”

        Every discussion I have with people who promote life is the same. You followed right in line: You all act arrogant and only care about yourselves. There are plenty of people’s children who wish they had never been born. Some of these people commit suicide. Others don’t, but continue on in pain. Your children might be hiding it from you. You have no idea. Even if they don’t, they might end up overdosing on drugs and end up in an alley with a needle in their arm. Happens all the time. Maybe this won’t happen to you and you’ll get lucky. Doesn’t mean it’s not happening out there. But as you’ve inferred, all you care about is your own little bubble.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 3:14 pm Hello

        “For a nihilist, you sure are moralistic.”

        “You must be European origin or heavily admixed, probably Nordic, I would say. There is no way an Arab, Negro, Subcon or Chinaman could care deep enough to come up with that kind of shit.”

        You call it “shit” but then you use words like “care” and “moralisitc.” I think you know what I’m saying has value and is not just a bunch of nonsense. You know that I’m making a logical argument. It’s just that this logic doesn’t give you the emotional high you’re used to when you think about whatever it is you normally think about.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 3:16 pm Hello

        By the way, I’m not a “nihilist.” A nihilist thinks everything is meaningless. I’ve said that suffering matters.

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 1:38 pm FamilyMan

      Please explain how CH is against natalism.

      Not being kind to women who screw behind your back is self-respect, such a man can pass on that attitude to his children when he stops wasting his time with the wrong women and finds a suitable one to become their mother.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 8:37 am Hello

        I don’t know if he’s against natalism. I said his next step is antinatalism because he’s already analyzed stuff to the point where he’s now basically just repeating himself.

        LikeLike


  32. on February 6, 2014 at 9:19 pm Baby

    This is because you implied she was a slut. This makes her want to have more sexytimes with you, because the only way slutty women know how to regain lost power over their men is with their vajheenz.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 7:29 am Zombie Shane

      > “the only way slutty women know how to regain lost power over their men is with their vajheenz”

      That’s a very interesting – and very CLASSICAL – point of view, implying that a moral man must be the master of his own shortcomings [rather than a slave to them].

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 9:28 am Tilikum

      ain’t that the truth.

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 1:42 pm FamilyMan

      The slutty woman is controlled by her vagina. The vagina may or may not have power over other men, it does have power over her.

      The man who is not controlled by it can be the master of this woman including all her parts. Otherwise he can be rid of her and not worry about the whole problem.

      The vagina is a problem she should be solving herself, not finding men to inflict it on.

      LikeLike


  33. on February 6, 2014 at 10:53 pm rouge

    I would love to see the OP try it in action. Let us know how it goes.

    Not start a fight with someone, but start a fight within their souls. Good stuff.

    LikeLike


  34. on February 7, 2014 at 12:24 am TheMightyZoTz

    We interrupt this broadcast to inform you that Pamela Anderson has officially hit The Wall:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2553339/Pamela-Anderson-turns-PDAs-husband-Rick-Salomon-share-courtside-kiss-basketball-game.html

    Very sad. She is not aging gracefully.

    A once-mighty babe finally brought low and forced to settle for a beta she previously found too tiresome to keep around.

    Rick Salomon is an utter chump for remarrying her. He is aging way more gracefully, and he could easily pull a much younger woman if he got his Game together.

    What the fuck is he thinking?

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 12:08 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

      She was 90s hot, now she’s millennium rot.

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 1:23 pm Jay in DC

      Unrecognizable. Had you just linked this I don’t think I could have ever guessed this was Pam Anderson. She is like her other whore partner Jenna Jameson. Was smoking in the 90s and now just look like they should be in nursing homes.

      The carousel has a terrible cost, and you are right about dude, he could easily have a 20 something courtside.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 2:42 pm Amy

        I don’t know if casual sex/multiple partners ages a woman as much as hard partying and over-tanning. Of course, they all tend to go together.

        LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 1:47 pm FamilyMan

      I’m favorably impressed. She doesn’t look like a slut.

      To my eyes she never looked graceful, and her low-rent TV shows were anatomical rather than appealing. Now she looks like a modestly dressed middle aged woman and that’s fine.

      Wonder if she got a prenup before marrying this guy though.

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 2:29 pm Lara

      She actually looks pretty good. She just needs a softer hair color, and to dress more sensibly for a basketball game.

      [CH: Hitting the Wall is not necessarily about looking bad. It’s a metaphor for that moment in life when a woman loses any trace of sexual desirability to most men with options.]

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 7:06 am blogster

      you do realise she’s 46? what do you expect her to look like – 34? There is something to be said about randomly applying “the wall” phrase just because a woman is older. But yes, she looks like shit.

      LikeLike


  35. on February 7, 2014 at 1:12 am Libertardian

    Your daily feelgood diversity story. I’m sure the MSM will wail on and on about this guy just like they did for James Hooker, right?

    http://f2bbs.com/bbs/show_topic/944374

    LikeLike


  36. on February 7, 2014 at 1:53 am Jaap

    This is very cool….. Very important to look at these things from a positive, humoristic point of view 🙂 Turn it into something funny!

    LikeLike


  37. on February 7, 2014 at 3:28 am Marellus

    … a leaked recording of a telephone conversation between US assistant secretary of state Victoria Nuland and the US envoy to the Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, discussing who should be in Ukraine’s next government …

    Now if you would ignore the geopolitical ramifications of this, here you have a beta supplicating to an ‘alpha’ mare, with said ‘alpha’ mare a bit too vehement in her dislike to Klitchko. And listening to this, Vox was right after all; women do ruin everything.

    LikeLike


  38. on February 7, 2014 at 6:20 am Grim

    I guarantee you will not see one MSM story about the Olympics that does note too the anti fags rape children law, which MSM calls “anti gay rights” law, because YKW MSM thinks mutant faggot failures have the “right” to rape my kids’ minds and bodies.

    we must get US to print own money and remove power of YKW MSM money changing faggot rats.

    http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/02/07/3917833/linda-robertson-olympics-of-odd.html

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 12:59 pm thwack

      Grim

      we must get US to print own money and remove power of YKW MSM money changing faggot rats.
      ——————————————————————————————-

      maybe you need a better grade of criminal?

      LikeLike


  39. on February 7, 2014 at 9:28 am CT

    Youtube proves CH right again.
    http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/83857631/

    This guy attempts a pickup and gets blown the fxck out.
    As she is in the process of rejecting him an actor comes up and asks the guy when he’s gonna throw another mansion party with Drake and Lil Wayne. After that happens the chick falls all over herself trying to get some alpha seed. She even pretends to have bought this guys imaginary album.

    That’s Super Saiyan wing man game right there. Having a “random” person interrupt your pick up to shower you in preselection/DHV panty melting acid rain.

    Best part is, you can see the moment her hamster breaks light speed and causes a worm hole to open from the park bench they are on to the back seat of a car.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 9:31 am Tilikum

      you aren’t really surprised are you?

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 10:56 am CT

        Not really, I just enjoy seeing hypergamy laid bare. The majority of my life I thought women were far too complex to be understood. Now that I’m an experienced cockslinger with lots of red pill in me, I feel like Neo at the end of The Matrix. That is to say where afcs see women, I see easily readable green source code in the shape of a woman. Where I saw the mysterious workings of the heart, I now see Agent Hamster leveraging her vaj to secure the best DNA and resources for herself and offspring.

        And like Neo, once I began to see women as little lines of code, I could manipulate it, sidestep it, trigger desired responses, knock over pedestals, do whatever. Unplugging from the matrix is great. But plugging back into the matrix to slay tang, now that’s what it’s about.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 2:06 pm Tilikum

        lol, you gotta point.

        LikeLike


  40. on February 7, 2014 at 10:08 am Grim

    Pam Anderson wall: holy shiit!!!!!!!!! And after all that surgery. Absolute proof there is no hope for a woman’s looks after age 45. She looks like my grandma now. I never did like fake boobs….but her face was cute. wow just wow.

    I think the woman I met the other day must be about 46…..she said she was 38 but she was lying I think..

    not kissable…..would be like kissing my mom

    LikeLike


  41. on February 7, 2014 at 10:09 am Grim

    CH, re: Pam Anderson wall, lzozllzlzlzlzlz: let’s remember:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=pamela+anderson+young&espv=210&es_sm=93&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=NBP1Up3FH4uvkAei64DwCA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1440&bih=799#facrc=_&imgrc=wRyobabMHz3RgM%253A%3BimQsAFk02pwkzM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252F31.media.tumblr.com%252F04779728990ac817c3fc8073cbf50878%252Ftumblr_mr4ca3Dn6P1rpqa4xo1_500.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fonthevergeofgreatness1.tumblr.com%252Fpost%252F57529641202%252Fyoung-pamela-anderson%3B500%3B716

    wow!!!!!!

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 11:31 am AlmostAnonymous

      Poor Pam.

      She didn’t hit the Wall as much as the Wall beat the fuck out of her.

      LikeLike


  42. on February 7, 2014 at 10:56 am Grim

    lzolzozlzozl

    Da womenz and exxxspecially da feminizstzs LOVE “50 Shades of Hogtiesdz” zlzozlzoz

    http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/fifty-shades-grey-star-dakota-johnson-shame-article-1.1604539

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 11:12 am Grim

      dats because the actz depiczted in dat book and movie are “steamy” and “dreamy” lzozlzozlzo swoonz

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 8:54 pm Nicole

        Sometimes it is in real life too…

        LikeLike


  43. on February 7, 2014 at 11:17 am The Burninator

    Good googly moogly, who has time for these kinds of psychological games? If she has an ex in the rolodex and it’s clear that she’s keeping him “on the hook” as backup (which, frankly, she is if he’s in the rolodex), you pack your shit and move on and never look back. If there are kids, you keep the conversation short, focused tighter than carbon atoms morphing into diamonds, and you leave her no room for any other topic in the short time you communicate.

    Directness works so much better for me than scripted revenge or intrigue scenarios regarding chicks I am about to dump. And I don’t have a mind for this kind of passive aggressive stuff, to be honest.

    If you think she’s fucking around or about to with her Rolodex Battalion and it’s not an agreed upon thing such as at the beginning when you’re both still seeing other people, then just leave. No fuss, no muss, no 50 Ways To Leave Your Lover scripts required.

    Forget all the fuss Muss, no need to discuss much.

    LikeLike


  44. on February 7, 2014 at 11:20 am Nicole

    If I am still contacting an ex I don’t have children with and wasn’t married to, it’s because I do not view him as a man, or he later came out as homosexual.

    LikeLike


  45. on February 7, 2014 at 11:24 am Mel Gibson

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/02/06/More-Americans-Prefer-Their-Laptop-and-Smartphones-to-Sex

    “Enjoy the decline” is a suitable response to these poll results.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 11:29 am Grim

      Pathetic.

      On the dating sites, all women who answer the question list their iPhone as something they can’t live without. They don’t even try to show they have a functioning brain.

      Pathetic.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 12:44 pm The Burninator

        Take a positive from it. They’re letting you know directly that they do not hide their narcissism and their constant 24/7 need for social affirmation from a worldwide audience. They’re also telling you that they will *never* have the desire for any decent length of one on one time with you that is not interrupted by their friend’s posting a new LOLCat for them to comment on. In a way, you should thank them.

        Best to catch that kind of thing up front, really.

        LikeLike


  46. on February 7, 2014 at 11:44 am Just Saying

    “As the sexual gatekeepers, women should always be held the more responsible party”

    Absolutely – that’s why there is the saying, “bro’s before ho’s” – don’t take it out on him for doing what every man will do. Although that doesn’t mean that you may not enjoy evenings with his present GF. You can forgive him, but hey – he tried what you had, it’s only fair that you return the favor. 🙂

    I’ve enjoyed more than a few present GF’s and wives through knowledge of who has hooked up with whom over the years on the down-low. Women hear everything – just takes it a while to make its way to where they want to act. So you drop that little “easter-egg” and she’ll worry at it, till it bears fruit for you. Then you can have your “secret” – women are good at keeping them, as long as it benefits them to do so…

    LikeLike


  47. on February 7, 2014 at 12:06 pm Subarctic Hillbilly

    Re: 24-year-old teacher in Washington State accused of sexxing up her students.

    Wow. Just wow.

    Can you imagine the trauma, the years of suffering and depression and low self-esteem these poor students must endure? Their lives are ruined! Wait, you mean the victims are boys?

    This sexual predator must pay!

    Have her scrubbed and sent to my tent!

    LikeLike


  48. on February 7, 2014 at 12:32 pm redpillcomic

    You know she’s a whore, just get out and move on. Spying on her and trying to create some awkward moment is a big waste of time and energy.

    LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 12:39 pm The Burninator

      ^ Ding!

      You win one internets.

      LikeLike


    • on February 7, 2014 at 1:03 pm july

      So true. Find something more constructive to do than trying to beat women at their own games. Cutting them off and freezing out hurts way more than people give it credit. The only downside is you miss out the instant gratification of witnessing the dread at work.

      LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 1:49 pm FamilyMan

        And besides, she’ll beg to come back so she can show you her dread.

        I’m inclined to go cold rather than hot on this one too. Actually I’m inclined that way most of the time in such battles.

        LikeLike


      • on February 7, 2014 at 8:47 pm Nicole

        But what if he’s wrong and she’s basically just keeping the ex hanging on as a form of vengeance?

        Then you’ll be perceived as having done a passive aggressive flake-out.

        I think it’s better to go aggressive-aggressive, because then if you got things all wrong, you can still go out like a man. If you were right, then you were right and handled it like a man, and she has to respect you even though she can’t have you.

        That’s some tasty justice.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 6:23 pm Mitch Cumstein

        What are you adding to this discussion? He’s not wrong. That’s the inconvenience of having a woman lurk around here. We have to cast doubt over what we instinctively know to be true, just so you can feel like you’re part of the huddle. You’re not.

        If this guy wants to know what he should do, he should ask himself, “What kind of story do I want to tell my friends about this closure a year from now? 5 years from now?”

        I’m just glad he’s here sharing his story on CH, rather than sending his tear-soaked woes to Men’s Health and asking Jimmy the Bartender or some other modern “guru” how to handle his discomfort. “Talk about how uncomfortable it makes you feel…”

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 9:26 pm Nicole

        I, same as everyone else here, am adding perspective to this discussion.

        There are sides to this that people may not be taking into account. One big thing guys tend to overlook is that women are vengeful. It is part of womanhood that if a woman doesn’t have, it makes her less a woman.

        Sometimes our kindness is masked cruelty.

        Sometimes we keep in touch with exes, especially if we didn’t drink the kookaid, nurtured our appearance and talents, and know he will never find a suitable replacement for us, just to someday have the pleasure of hearing, “I fucked up…”

        Sweet…sweet that is.

        The only reason I don’t do this is because I’ve been there enough times to know giving a shit about a guy who abandoned me is a waste of time. I have my fit and then I stop.

        Other women still savor that moment though.

        The problem for the new boyfriend, in this case is not that she would cheat, but that she is spending too much energy and emotion on vengeance, and it gets in the way of her current relationship. A taken woman should behave in a way that is above reproach. Her desire for vengeance against the ex may be keeping her from doing that.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 7:51 am atahualpa

      Thank you. So few could really pull it off, and the few who could, why would they waste their time? You want to get under her skin? Don’t care about her. Take someone else home. Better than the most well though out and executed womanish butthurt quip.

      LikeLike


  49. on February 22, 2014 at 11:13 am DragonfromCY

    Heartiste, forgive me for the late update. I just finished reading all the comments.

    I’m the OP.

    Excellent post, I appreciate you sharing your devious thoughts. Yes the “don’t be butthurt” posts from the commentariat are also appreciated, but there are few thrills as delicious as screwing with a girl who deserves it, and that’s what Heartiste is tapping into.

    Unfortunately, the guy didn’t show up. But I’m not done with this. There are a few salient details, if I have your ear:

    The evidence I found on her was lots of flirting between them, an agreement to meet, and a neg from him to the effect of “you’re not a great shag”.

    I made her open her email and dig up the chat log; her defense was vociferous and came down to repeating “he never called over on his own, and he was joking around about the ‘bad shag'” (like the fact that it never happened despite all the flirty build up was his flirty way of saying she was a bad shag). I did a relatively malevolent thing and made her swear on her (sick) father’s life (he was in the hospital at the time) and she did, without hesitation, swear that the two of them never had sex, though they kissed and she admitted she really wanted at the time to shag him but the opportunity never arose. Then she met me and he disappeared from her mind.

    Fuck, the seeds of doubt are sown. That, or she’s an evil lying cunt.

    The other day I wandered into a store to pick up some shit when I saw, to my surprise, that the guy worked there (it’s a little camping/outdoorsy-shit store). So, I know where he works.

    Should I just enjoy defiling her holes and let this shit go? Or should I buy the guy a beer and ask him, conspiratorially, what the story is and that it’d stay between me and him? I don’t know anything about him, but a quick up-and-down assessment of him is slightly lazy, disheveled lesser alpha, probably cool to have a beer with.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    Ironsides on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Carlos Danger on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Jay in DC on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Agent X on Oy, There It Is
    jOHN MOSBY on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Davy Holmes on Sweden, The Cuck Corner Stool…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    jOHN MOSBY on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: