• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Overheard In [Redacted]
DIVCON 2: “…freshly ground cumin and rehydrated, pureed chilies” »

New York Beta Times Stumbles On Chateau Heartiste Truth, Mass Hysteria Ensues

February 8, 2014 by CH

A year late and a neural synapse short, the New York Beta Times has stumbled upon a dusty CH tome and (re)discovered an obvious fact of the sexes: Domestic servitude makes a man undesirable in the eyes and loins of his woman.

A study called “Egalitarianism, Housework and Sexual Frequency in Marriage,” which appeared in The American Sociological Review last year, surprised many, precisely because it went against the logical assumption that as marriages improve by becoming more equal, the sex in these marriages will improve, too. Instead, it found that when men did certain kinds of chores around the house, couples had less sex. Specifically, if men did all of what the researchers characterized as feminine chores like folding laundry, cooking or vacuuming — the kinds of things many women say they want their husbands to do — then couples had sex 1.5 fewer times per month than those with husbands who did what were considered masculine chores, like taking out the trash or fixing the car. It wasn’t just the frequency that was affected, either — at least for the wives. The more traditional the division of labor, meaning the greater the husband’s share of masculine chores compared with feminine ones, the greater his wife’s reported sexual satisfaction.

This news so shocked the NYBTimes readership that the high IQ assembled emptied their bowels en masse and vaulted the article to #1 most-emailed. In a den of liars, a simple truth is meme-king. Quoting the CH bastion of enlightenment,

When men are men and women are women, the sex is more frequent. And probably hotter, too. When men are scalzied manboobs and women are manjawed feminists, the bedroom is an arid wasteland of dashed passion.

Sexual polarity — the primal force that adheres the cosmic cock to the celestial snatch — is the truth of truths that belies every feminist assertion ever made in the history of that insipid, leprotic ideology. May the losers of the world quake and fall to their knees before its divine directive.

You may now take a moment to ponder what terrible, horrible, no good, very bad truths the high priests of leftoidism will scare themselves into noticing next. Down the hall, second door on the right… what’s that you’ve found? Biological race differences? Good God, man! Brace yourself against something sturdy! Third floor, door at the end of the hall… women love badboys? Lawdy it’s another breathtaking nugget of common sense! You’ve just loaded your diaper. There there, dear.

Let them have their circus act. Whatever they need to keep those UES cocktail party invites flowing, and their naughty thoughts checked before their self-admiration is wrecked. It’s all fun and games unless $$$trillions$$$ are wasted on turning their self-medicating lies into public policy. Woops.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Feminist Idiocy, Girls, Relationships, Ugly Truths | 334 Comments

334 Responses

  1. on February 8, 2014 at 11:01 am Chad

    “Specifically, if men did all of what the researchers characterized as feminine chores like folding laundry, cooking or vacuuming — the kinds of things many women say they want their husbands to do”

    It is funny that I ran across this piece of satire about this very behavior which has more truth than most are willing to admit.

    The best is the line at the end – “What a fucking pussy”. Which is exactly what women will think of them.

    http://www.theonion.com/video/report-rising-number-of-weak-emasculated-men-worki,35193/

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 2:49 pm Zombie Shane

      > “A year late and a neural synapse short, the New York Beta Times…”

      Here’s a 14-month difference:

      Male And Female Brains Are Wired Differently, Alert The Feminists
      December 3, 2013 by CH
      https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/12/03/male-and-female-brains-are-wired-differently-alert-the-feminists/

      Brain development between men and women result in different decisions
      February 9, 2014
      http://www.examiner.com/article/brain-development-between-men-and-women-result-different-decisions

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 9:26 am burke

        i think the point holds, but two months and a week actually right?

        LikeLike


  2. on February 8, 2014 at 11:04 am NIETZSCHE

    what these idiots dont seem to understand..besides everything about everything..is that NO ONE LIKES DOING WORK. once you “have” to do something you hate it. and you’re miserable.

    Of course women say they hate doing those chores because it becomes work. when I first started plumbing i loved it. it didnt take long for me to despise it completely.

    women especially seem to hate everything.

    There’s nothing masculine about stirring cake batter. Women dont look at a man sliding a vaccuum across the floor and think “oooh look at him working those triceps”. WHen they see you exerting yourself installing something heavy, using your masculine manly muscles and skills, it turns them on.

    I HOPE IT DOESNT HAVE TO BE SAID AT THIS POINT THAT FIXING A WOMANS HOUSE IS NOT GOING TO SUDDENLY MAKE HER WANT YOUR COCK IN HER MOUTH. THESE FACTS OF LIFE APPLY ONLY TO MEN WHO ALREADY ARE BALLING THEIR WOMEN.

    LikeLike


  3. on February 8, 2014 at 11:09 am gregoryoh

    Here’s my problem: I love cooking and I am a really good cook. I even thinking of starting a business around cooking. What should I do? Stop cooking to get more pussy?

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 11:18 am Preston

      cook on your terms

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:27 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        lzlzozozoz

        hey heartsietteetzZ!!!

        now dat da NYT has picked up on, Dalrock will soon take credit for it, dipping the news in JEsus Juicez, baking it in da bunn, and serving it up fresh to his flock of frankfurtian frankfartiansz as da Manly Truth, as da one True Way to Slvation is through da bunghzozlzio of his blog zlzozolzlozozozo as he invented Game, and he, and only he is allowe dto discuss Game, as other discussions on Game are derailing the internetz zlzolozlzlozozloozz.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 9:47 am Edward Waverley

        Has Dalrock been dissing CH and company? If so, disappointing.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 9:56 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Yes,

        Dalrock’s shtick is that Heartiste is a big sinner, while Dalrock teaches that all of the gamers and butethxterzz who read his blog are saved, because they practice Game, instead of game.

        Then, Dalrock commands his flock of frankfartian fanboyz to never discuss “Game” nor include HEartiste’s definitions of Game, as such conversations derail his blog, knocking it off the rails he set up to ease game into Jesus’s Bungzhzozlzozolo.

        Basically Dalrock is stating that he is the Alpha and Omega of Game, and the only way to gamey salvation is through his blog, while HEartiste’s readers are damned to hell for following the teachings of game instead of Game with a capital G, which Vox also teaches is superior to fallen game.

        LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2014 at 3:18 pm CGS

        I don’t know what Dalrock says about game and how it relates to a Bible-based marriage, but I do know what the Bible says about it – NOTHING. There is no room for game in a Bible-based marriage. The Bible quite clearly states the roles of the husband and the wife in marriage.

        Consider the following from Ephesians 5:

        22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.

        23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.

        24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

        25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
        …

        28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.
        —
        I didn’t see any mention of game in that passage. And let’s be quite clear about what game is – the manipulation of the female psyche in order to gain access to sexual behavior(hence the name “game”). If a man were to “game” himself (since he is commanded to love his wife as himself) he would be manipulating himself to gain access to something he values – like using game. But game has only manifested itself as a viable strategy because the dynamics of mate selection have been flipped on their head. That is the rub with game, it requires rationalizing a destructive social dynamic. Most “churchians” do not acknowledge this flipped script even though it is evident throughout the Bible:

        [b]1 Cor 14:[/b]

        34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law.

        35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

        [b]Titus 2:[/b]

        1 But speak thou the things which become sound doctrine:

        2 That the aged men be sober, grave, temperate, sound in faith, in charity, in patience.

        3 The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things;

        4 That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,

        5 To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.

        [b]Proverbs 12:4[/b]

        A virtuous woman is a crown to her husband: but she that maketh ashamed is as rottenness in his bones.

        [b]Proverbs 31[/b] (has A LOT to say about a wife’s behavior)

        10 Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.

        11 The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil.

        12 She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life.

        …

        25 Strength and honour are her clothing; and she shall rejoice in time to come.

        26 She openeth her mouth with wisdom; and in her tongue is the law of kindness.

        27 She looketh well to the ways of her household, and eateth not the bread of idleness.

        …

        And the best line of all in the passage:

        30 Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the Lord, she shall be praised.

        —————————————————————————-

        There are many more examples throughout the Bible that describe the role of the woman in a marriage and likewise for the husband:

        [b]1 Timothy 3[/b]

        2 Therefore an overseer must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, sober-minded, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach

        Game is not a biblical concept. In the Bible it is quite clear that the woman is to be subservient to the man and the man to love his wife and treat her with mercy. This concept is taught in both testaments and is one of the first lessons learned after the fall:

        [b]Genesis 3[/b]

        16 To the woman he said, “I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.”

        Trying to place game into a biblical context is like trying to place a geocentirc model of the solar system into modern astronomy. The authors of the Bible understood female nature and created the biblical model because it was the system that was best for their society. Unfortunately science has turned the idea of God into a relic of the past for most individuls in western society. Unfortunately, the wisdom regarding interpersonal behavior and social dynamics is still quite valid if one is interested in the amelioration of society.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:46 am burke

        preston’s right. don’t do it in a frilly apron, do it better than she does, and probably cook things she can’t. and give her shit about it. have her do the dishes.

        i like making a huge weekend breakfast, myself. and i don’t think a lot of women can do it properly

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 3:19 pm CaptainObvious

        I’ll never forget that scene in Goodfellas. All the wiseguys in jail going to great lengths to cook an old fashioned italian meal for all the boys.

        Yes men do everything better. Except that is squirting out bastards and being a snarky cunt. The latter however is becoming the modern male lady boy’s domain as well.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 5:05 pm corvinus

        Teach (or train) her to cook.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:48 am Zombie Shane

        > “cook on your terms”

        This.

        Although your bitch WILL get lazy on you if she doesn’t have to cook.

        She’s gonna need to make it up somewhere else in your lives [and, as per the study, it’ll have to be somewhere OTHER than the bedroom].

        Laziness => indolence => idleness.

        And you know what they say about idleness: An idle mind is the Devil’s playground.

        Maybe you could teach her your recipes and then force her to make them even better than you make them?

        You could be the teacher and she could be the student.

        Get a little of that authoritative/submissive dynamic going between the two of you?

        > “UES cocktail party invites”

        http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ues

        So UES = “Upper East Side”.

        Anybody got a quick and concise description of the difference between the folks who populate the UES versus the folks who populate the UWS?

        Thanks.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 5:07 pm FamilyMan

        UES is beautiful prewar (that’s pre WWII, generally before steel framing) buildings, old money.

        UWS is newer, doesn’t look especially elite going thru, but it’s expensive too. Used to be considered bohemian, maybe 30 years ago before it got so expensive.

        Central Park sits in between the two areas.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 5:56 am Zombie Shane

        Well I was wondering if maybe the UES was more Whit Stillman whereas the UWS might be more Allen Stewart “Woody-4-Dylan” Konigsberg?

        And maybe it might show up in the voting at the precinct level?

        I remember that, back in the day, Rush Limbaugh used to talk about living in a “fashionable UES bachelor’s pad”, or somesuch.

        Before he departed for the income-tax-free haven of Florida.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 7:07 am Zombie Shane

        OH. MY. GOD.

        The Hillary Papers
        Archive of ‘closest friend’ paints portrait of ruthless First Lady
        http://freebeacon.com/the-hillary-papers/

        The cynicism and the sociopathy and the lies upon lies upon lies upon lies are even more staggering than we realized.

        Heartise, there’s a 25,000 word essay for you.

        Maybe 100,000 words.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 3:53 pm Renault

        UES = wealthy WASPs
        UWS = wealthy Jews

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 3:08 pm brian

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 11:24 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozoz I LIKE TO TRAVEL!!!!

      i like to travel, and we can travel togethers. i will travel form da bedroom to da couch to play grand theft autoz, while youwill travel from da bed to da kitchen to make da GBFM a morning omelelete with lotssa cheddar cheese but not form between your kness zlzlozlzlo

      lzozozo

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:25 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        taken from:

        lozozozoz DA GBFM’S ONLINE DATINGZ PROFILEZ LZOzozlzozlzozlzoz

        lzozlzzzzo da GBFM dont no online datetz as A) i have not eneouch cockeasz to handaled all da psuusysys pusysys pusysysy dat come my way in real life in da coffee shopd shich i call starfuckszx as da GBFM is da fuckstatr in da coffe shop lzlzozo beoyenend faacebook and buttcobook and assbook lzlzozl and 2) der is too much risk dat her picturez was taken when she was hotter, younger tighter thirty pounds lighter dureing the commencnemnt of her massive cock carosuslel crusade and bountiful buttcocking battlez zzoozoz so da GBFM letsz da betasz pay da oldsnatch.com datng feez to look @ a chix pre-bernankifed photoso zlzozlzoozozoz

        but here woudld be my profielz if da GBFM did onlinez date: lzozoz

        GBFM SEEKSZ TIGTHT PUSYSYSYIZYOSUSOUSSIUOJZOZzlzlzlzlzoz

        TITLE: LOTSAS COCKAS 4U 2 serve ur ginatinglelzlzol but not buttztingzlzlzolzoz
        “my name is da gbfm of worldwide fame and renown. i don’t buttcockz cause my cockas too big and ur anus (not da planet uranus lzozzlz) is likely too small, unless u have been buttcocked many timez, in which case you have been bernnakififed and deosuled & ur anus IS likely big as da planet URANUS lzozozo and i don’t no waannna gina cock you no more as u are proabably as a big a pain in da ass as da pain in uranus ass from all da buttccokingz during your cock carsoule crusisidng days of whorey glory zlzlzoozo.

        my ideaz of an idealsz date is to talk about da GREAT BOOKZ FOR MENZ which menasz dat u shut up and da GBFM doesz all da talkingz cause we know womenz never read homer’s iliad nor odyssey notr bible on their own (Except dey be fmeinists frankfurt schools deocntsructing da great books instead of respecting da GBFM’s frankfurter in der mouth lzoozlzoz), but womenz only readz vampire gina-tingly butt-tingly crap like twilight and julia prostsititute roberts book eat, prey, butthext”

        even dough my last seneveenteen girlz complained dat da GBFM is soooo complicated, my ruels rulez arez simple:
        bring da movbiez = lostas cokas 4u
        bring no movies = no cockasz 4u

        P.S. and please pelasez please i beg of you do not waste da GBFM’s precious itme. time. pleasez post up-tod-ate picture of you TODAY! do NOT post pictures of you when you were younger hotter tighter and fifty pounds lighter back in da day when you were givingz it up for free 2 all da buttccokerz in your bernkifiing dorm of student debt and anal debaucheyr lzlzoz as da debt was augmented in sectrieve meethingsz of da fed and da nauth violted in sectrely taped buttcheidnt sessionz zlzl, and pretending dat because you were once hot da GBFM now owes u moneysz to get down on what you gave away for free before u contrtced dat STD. lzozolzolzoo

        i like to travel, and we can travel togethers. i will travel form da bedroom to da couch to play grand theft autoz, while youwill travel from da bed to da kitchen to make da GBFM a morning omelelete with lotssa cheddar cheese but not form between your kness zlzlozlzlo

        if u are thirty and have had ur fun and r looking to “get serious,” then please get serious! da gbfm ain’t no backcup beta nor da last branch you can grab as you fall from da tree of your sexual peak in your early twentietsz which you wasted on lsostas cockas riding da cock carousleuesz. and now u see da GBFM’s massive lotsas cockas and mistake it for a thick tree branch u can grab on just beofree you hit da ground of eterna spinterhood zlozlzolzolzo causez da gbfm don’t give no cockasz to dose dat have “had their fun,” bt only does fresh young hot tight tights who r having funz zlozozoz

        when you comtact me please include:
        how many pounds u have gained since your profile picture was taken (rounded to nearest tens of poundsz lzozlzl).

        \how many timez you have been bernnakified via:
        how many cockasz u have taken in da buttholzizo since your profile picture was taken.
        how many pounds u have *REALLY* gained since your profile picture was taken.
        how many cockasz u have taken in da ginazizo since your profile picture was taken.
        how many cockasz u have taken in da mouthollzizo since your profile picture was takenz.

        i know dat you wills undertted your bernifiaction numbers by a factor of 5 or more in da same way da fed undesrsrtated inflationz, so i have my eocnomistsz grad stdudnets muiltiply your ansers by 5 lzoozozoz so if you sayou have been bernankkekified 10 timesz we will know it was at least fifty and proebeleeby more zlzoozozoz u do da mathz lzozoz

        da gbfm looks forwards to meetingz youz and may r luvz last 4eever or at leats until da gbfm has cumed zlzlzloz sploododeged zlzlzlozo whichever cumsz firts zlzlzolzozozlzoz

        RELIGION: Chruchcianz, as I beelieve dat JEuss will frogive forgive you and ur hot sister for our threesomsznz lzlzlzlzlzo & u will be made whoel and good as new and can still mary a beta providerz and prey to jesus 2 heal heal ur sore buttholiolozlz and bring a good man ur wya zlzozlolzo

        lozozoz

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:40 am Preston

        I read the bible and the iliad – they both suck. Odyssey is cool tho.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:47 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        I did your mom and sister– they both suck. your gf is cool tho.

        lzozozololz

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:50 am Preston

        NO. I challenge u to deathmatch

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:54 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        no, your gf is not cool. you r right.

        now dat i am done wit her no longer is she coolzlozzlz

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 12:01 pm Preston

        ffffffffffuuuuuuuuuu

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 1:47 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

        Reading the Bible made you the wholesome man you are today. lulzlzlulzlzlzlzzlzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 3:53 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        weellzlz yah i read da bibblelz
        but den i startedz reading dalrockasz blogz
        and he said dat
        christianity is all about GAMEZ
        dat chrictsiansz need game
        dat chrictaisnszt msut imbibe in and do game
        with a capital G
        like vox says
        2 join dalrockzas in heavenz
        while dalrock and vox teaches dat
        hearsteistztz heartrsietss will burn in hell
        for gaming with a lower case g
        instead of a capital G
        and buttehxting with a capital B
        instead of a lowercase b
        and so u see dalrockas saved my soul
        and vox healeded it
        and i am
        4ever grateful
        2 st. dlarockas and st vox
        4 showing da turth da light and da way
        to game with
        a
        capital
        G!
        zlzlzozozoz

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 7:35 am Zombie Shane

        URGENT GBFM ALERT:

        Sugar daddy website has coeds justifying prostitution
        By Tracy Motz
        February 9, 2014
        http://nypost.com/2014/02/09/sugar-daddy-website-has-coeds-rationalizing-prostitution/

        “…A quick Google search led her to SeekingArrangement.com, an online site that connects well-heeled benefactors, otherwise known as sugar daddies, with lesser-off “sugar babies,” and specifically targets Megan’s demographic: college students over their heads in debt…”

        So we’re talking not some abstract metaphorical theory-driven idea of an eBernankification.

        We’re talking actual, literal, physical, money-changing-hands [and DNA on little blue dresses] eBernankification.

        Apparently the guy behind this particular site is a Chinaman, named Lead Wey, who was born in Singapore, had a “Tiger Mom–type of upbringing”, and attended M.I.T.:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandon_Wade

        Singaporean Chinamen, doing the jobs Americans won’t do.

        Gotta love all the dynamism from that enlightened immigration policy of ours:

        Ingraham Battles George Will, Fox Panel: GOP ‘Elites’ Pushing Immigration Reform
        http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3121058/posts

        ‘“You’re the one who’s arguing the AFL-CIO argument,” Will said, noting that the “economic dynamism” aided by immigrants would help sustain the American workforce…’

        We’ll put George Will’s sorry ass on the short list for public impalement on Day One of the Revolution.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 12:20 pm Grim

        Guys I had this as my profile for 2 days. Girls got really pissed.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 12:29 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        zlozzozoolz

        post some of der responseszzz!!! share some of da responsesz please! tahnskz!!

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 3:42 pm Matthew

        Please, do.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 7:39 pm Grim

        Damn. Deleted. Shoulda kept. Mainly no replies but some hamster bitchfests because I also link heartiste and

        http://www.lightlybraisedturnip.com/story-for-women-on-matchcom/2013/3/16/a-parable-for-the-older-single-women-of-matchcom-told-by-pro.html

        to the ones who deserve it.

        LOLOLOLOZZZZ.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:31 pm FamilyMan

        Grim, that story’s pretty good. But someone has to be the first to meet those asian chicks who do arrive on US university campuses …

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 11:24 am Pluviophile

      Don’t fret, you’ll find groupies.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 12:07 pm Scott

      If you can humiliate a woman in the kitchen, and most men can, that’s alpha.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 12:27 pm Grim

        I can cook. Learned to in order to properly feed my kids. Basics. Meat. HB8 single MOTHER tried to cook for me one time. Homemade pizza. Girls love carbs. I think it’s another huff post meme. They all want to make homemade pizza , which means adding extra toppings to a premade frozen one. I think some puffed ho advice column advised them to make pizza for a man. Lol. Girl doesn’t even have sufficient tools. Like not even a fucking pan in her house. She’s Colombian too. 31. Lololzlolzozlolz

        One other time I brought steak and vegetables to her apartment to cook. For me to cook. Again she doesn’t even have a knife to cut the meat. Only like 3 butter knives. She’s not poor either. Comes from money and her ex pays her plenty. Has a paid off condo.

        Not sure what she feeds her son when she has him.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 12:31 pm Grim

        Re last sentence. Her fridge empty.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 8:49 am Joey

        The extent to which women as a group don’t cook well and are indifferent to tastes, textures, and overall quality of their food continues to surprise me. Sure, some women get it. But on the balance, asking a woman to cook for you… well, it’s a gamble. Most seem to respond as if they’re trying to punish us, even when they’re trying hard to please. I have a couple married cousins who cook a lot for the family and eating their food is just brutal. Tastes good to all the women in the family though, right? Reminds me of Deti’s discussion about bad oral technique. A lot of them aren’t malicious, it’s that they just don’t have a clue. Just ‘cuz you’re a woman doesn’t mean you inherently “know” food and cooking. I don’t want to be a kitchenbitsch, but honestly, I don’t want to eat shit food either, and if somebody genuinely can’t tell the difference between under-seasoned, well done chuck roast and an exquisite, medium rare ribeye, then there’s not a thing that classes or training or me yelling is going to do to get them to improve.

        As for homemade pizza… Caputo #00 pizza flour. That’s the secret. Not adding some olives and tuna fish to a Tombstone pepperoni.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 12:56 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozl me tooo!!!!

      Here’s my problem: I love cocking and I have a really big cock. I even thinking of starting a business around cocking. What should I do? Stop cocking to get less pussy?

      z;lzolzozo

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:52 pm Jones

        GBMF: Stop fucking poultry, you cockfucker.

        LAAAWWLZhawhawhawROFLCOPTER

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 1:02 pm BS Inc.

      Nietzsche says that “woman as cook” is a bad joke and basically accounts for European decadence. I wouldn’t sweat liking to cook at all.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 1:15 pm Hugh G. Rection

      As long as she does the cleaning, laundry, etc…

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 1:26 pm ‘Reality’ Doug

      Seriously, gregoryoh? The man has his mission and the woman supports it or she can gtfo. It’s okay to cook if that is YOUR mission. It’s not much of a mission if you are not going professional with it. A hobby is okay, but a chore to please a woman? Never. If you can get a woman to cook your meals your way, like you are the expert, that would be best. What matters is dominance and welfare management as in husbandry.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 1:48 pm timwburke

      Use your dick as your only kitchen utensil.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 1:54 pm Matthew King

      Cook with an alpha squint. Never grin. Errbody will know what’s up.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 2:07 pm The Karamazov Idea

      Quick quiz. Gordon Ramsay: Alpha or Beta? Alpha, and unbearably so. People strain to be accepted by him; for a mere passing compliment, sometimes even for the small honor of not being dismissed or insulted by him. People want to please him and take great pains to do so. That’s about as alpha as it gets. And his profession is, as you noted, a task typically reserved for women.

      Most head chefs, you’ll note, are men. The difference between a cook and a chef is that between a beta and an alpha. One is a chore, the other is, done correctly, art fused with function and hard work. Art, function and hard work are the three qualities which should describe every fundamentally male pursuit, hobby or profession.

      If you’re still skeptical, barbecue and the art of cooking meat is about the manliest thing you can master. With a good cast-iron cookware set and/or kettle-grill, some know-how, and even bargain-cuts of meat, you can cheaply prepare unbeatable food. Leave casseroles, meat-loafs, and the like to women. You can eat steak every day if you know which cuts to buy and how to cook them cheaper than some woman can make hamburger helper.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 2:47 pm Anon

        This gentleman gets it. Your reply reminds me of this great scene from Donnie Brasco. “Wherever you go, the best cooks are men. On Mars, the best cooks are gonna be men.”

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:30 pm FamilyMan

        Gordon Ramsey is a bit nuts.

        Jacques Pepin. Built like a linebacker, handles food roughly, world famous chef.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 9:55 pm FamilyMan

        “Chef” means “Chief”, the head of a kitchen. Obviously that’s an alpha, management role. But cooking for oneself or one’s family can be alpha in many ways even if you’re not bossing anyone around. It’s a physical job, involves decision making, artistic skill, knives, heat, butchered flesh.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 10:00 pm FamilyMan

        Oh yes. And chemistry.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 8:20 am Kate

        I think, like with everything else, its a relief when a man is better at something than you are. A man who cooks well is very attractive- a source of pride even. Some women are squeamish about handling certain meat, so they should make up for it in other ways, like baking, which seems a more feminine pursuit. What man could resist a woman with a little flour on her face? 🙂

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:14 pm Cummings-OralCummings.

        When I am done with her its not FLOUR thats on her face…

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 6:48 pm GasButtox

        KateButtox,

        But only women are good at detoxing my buttox.

        My buttox are smooth..
        My buttox are round..
        My buttox will soon make…
        An amazing sound !!

        After which you will…..

        …..Detox my Buttox..

        -GB

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 2:44 pm Anon

      Cooking is manly as fuck, and screw any limpdick who would tell you otherwise. It makes you less reliant on a girl and a massive way to demonstrate your value, particularly early on in a relationship and because most Western women can’t cook for shit. Cooking well and pairing it with a decent wine selection or some cocktails is an aphrodisiac and is a near guarantee to get you laid at a far cheaper price than a traditional dinner date and without the hassle of going out for drinks and angling to bring her over to your place or get invited back to hers later.

      Indeed, after I’ve cooked the meal, they inevitably reciprocate by defaulting to the traditionally feminine chores like cleaning up the table after and cleaning the dishes and scrubbing out the pots and pans.

      Continue cooking because you enjoy it, because it’s awesome, because it’s not mutually exclusive with getting laid (and should help you in that regard), and because it’s what you want to do.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 3:15 pm thwack

        Girls never sharpen their knives, they just buy new ones; and thats why all their knives are poor quality.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 8:26 am The Burninator

        Yeah, ain’t that the truth?

        The first time I whip out my Spyderco knife sharpening kit (triangle ftw) and steel to tighten up a set of knives you’d think it was the first time that a woman had ever heard of the notion of…gasp…maintaining one’s tools.

        Fucking weird ass view of life women have, I honestly don’t grok the mindset that fusses to the n-th degree over what kind of party to throw for little Princess Daughter, yet considers taking care of one’s tools as some alien ritual devoid of meaning. Ultimately princess daughter will fly the nest hating mom, while the tools in ones life remain more or less constant with proper care.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:08 pm corvinus

        True… having great cooking skills doesn’t appear to hurt the reputations of French and Italian guys.

        LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2014 at 10:25 pm foolishmastermind

        I agree with that…..I think a main reason why cooking gets such a bad rep though is because it is done grudgingly by beta husbands who’s wives consistently arrive home late from work. Then cooking become a mere chore rather than pleasure. But if that’s your passion man there ain’t nothing wrong with that. It also comes along with a tight neg where you can tease a girl that your better at cooking than her and that its SUPPOSED to be something women are better at. Tell her: “you need to step your cooking game up.”

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 3:19 pm Canadian Friend

      If the reason you cook for her is because you are a submissive beta/white-knight trying to appease her, that is different than if you are a manly man who happens to be a talented cook (kind of like a chef )

      if you turn it into a good business, even better that too is alpha/manly as women love men who have success and who are good provider

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 3:33 pm Bob Wallace

      The best chefs have always been men.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 3:45 pm Matthew

        Cooking involves fire, knives, and corpses. Man stuff all around.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 4:10 pm FamilyMan

      No problem, all the best chefs are men. Look at old cooking shows by Jacques Pepin, he comes across as a man’s man and handles the food pretty roughly.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 5:04 pm CGS

      Not like it is any different from the replies above, but I love to cook as well. Women do not know how to cook… hell most can barely slap together a palatable sandwich. Cooking is a manly pastime. Ask a bitch about mirepoix, the mother sauces or fundamental techniques and their eyes glaze over. One of my litmus tests for LTR material is to involve her and see if she is interested in learning how to cook.

      I have a Big Green Egg and I make all sorts of awesome dishes on it… pizza, paella, baked breads, steak, chicken etc and of course BBQ (it’s a noun, not a verb). I’ve had bitches ask me to make food for parties etc they like my cooking so much. A man with using fire and creating something from raw ingredients is masculine as fuck. The shit bitches do in the kitchen eg make a bagel or kraft shells and cheese, is not cooking.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:37 pm FamilyMan

        That’s a bit awkward if she asks you to provide food catering for her party. You have to say no. How do you handle that?

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 8:38 pm CGS

        I typically laugh. I tell her that I cook for my own edification. I enjoy well prepared food and I enjoy it on my own terms. The caveat is, unlike the OP I do not cook for a living. I feel as though cooking is not the proper term for what the OP stated, instead I view my cooking as a hobby and in the same way a furniture maker or gardener pursues his creation, I pursue mine. I prepare food not to impress, but instead prepare against what I know is my best. Each meal is a better iteration of a previous concoction. She just gets to experience the fruits of my labor. I will, however on my own terms (like a college football Saturday) invite her and her friends over to partake in my creation. I require that when my team is on that people do not interfere with my viewing. It is really just a matter of framing.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 5:39 pm Troubadour

      My wife isn’t hot, but I’ve been married for 20 years, still have sex, don’t get cheated on, and am free to cheat myself. I spent an hour the other day telling her all about this girl I’ve been gaming, and instead of lawyering up, she baked cookies. My point is that while I am no authority on gaming hot chicks, I have one of the most functional and successful marriages to come out of the last half of the 20th century. All my friends from school fared far, far worse than this.

      It is from that perspective that I point out one of the major features of our relationship has always been that we do normal gender stereotypical things here. I fix the car, I mow the lawn, I kill the spiders, she frets about the kids’ science fair schedule, washes the dishes, and does the laundry.

      It WORKS.

      The one exception to this rule is cooking. Her cooking tastes like ass. If I want a good meal, I need to cook myself. I’m most at home out in the yard drinking beer and smoking cigarettes while grilling dead animals over fire, but I can cook anything, and pretty much all of the housewares-related purchases we’ve made over the past 10 years have been items for me. My pepper mill, my gigantic stock pot, my steamer, my garlic press, etc.

      I think you can be a man and still do the cooking as long as you don’t do the cooking ALL the time, and you do the cooking BETTER than she does, and when you’re done cooking, you’re done in the kitchen. She cooks the day to day crappy subsistence stuff, and I cook the feasts everybody talks about for months. When the answer to “What’s for dinner?” is “Daddy is cooking,” everybody shows up to the table on time, and everybody eats well.

      I like to think of it as the difference between being a chef and a common housewife. The best cooks in the restaurant world are always men, and they’re not all a bunch of queers either. I’ve worked some restaurant jobs. The good cook has always been a manly kind of man who got laid like balls, like my mentor Jack.

      Jack was laid back, cool, excellent at cooking, and banging every chick in that joint, including the obligatory 16 year old jailbait hostess chick. (Watch the movie “Waiting” sometime. Except for the penis game, that was my restaurant. Don’t piss off the staff if you don’t like eating biohazards.)

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 6:54 pm YaReally

      Lot of good reframes/mindsets posted in reply to this. Great stuff, all. I esp like the “fire knives and corpses” bit and if I cooked and was made fun of for cooking that would be my go-to reply.

      The big key is how for the guys who’ve posted that cook, the notion of cooking NOT being badass and manly and alpha is RIDICULOUS. Like even reading their writing, that frame that cooking is badass radiates thru the text.

      For any guy with insecurities, whether it’s about your height or your hobbies or your job or your preferences in life, if you reframe your shit the way the guys here have fine with cooking, women will find it attractive because the strongest frame always wins and women ping off their environment to decide how to feel…so if you talk about cooking like a boss, or if you talk about collecting Pokemon cards like a boss, women will fall into the frame of “ok this must be cool and wow it’s hot how passionate he is”

      The funniest part is that if they objectively think the thing is lame, you become “the exception”. So it becomes “well guys cooking is kind of girly, BUT when (the guy I’m attracted to) does it, somehow I find it sexy”. And “collecting Pokemon cards is super lame…BUT when (the guy I’m attracted to) talks about it, wow he’s so passionate…I don’t really understand it, but he’s not like those NERDS that collect Pokemon cards.”

      They don’t even register the cognitive dissonance lol. And when you guys break up she’ll say “ughh he was so lame he was always in the kitchen like a woman/pokemoning, I like REAL men.”

      Remember: “I don’t do X because it’s cool. X is cool because I do it.”

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 3:19 am quasi

        Remember: “I don’t do X because it’s cool. X is cool because I do it.”

        Gold.

        Thanks, man.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 4:06 am quasi

        Further, I’d argue that cooking is Alpha because it signals self-reliance, an eminently Alpha quality. And it’s another arena in which to exhibit your confidence and competence – or, better yet, mastery – another Alpha hallmark. Plus it involves working with your hands; chicks are fascinated by men at work.

        All the above can be leveraged to great effect when it comes to cooking for a girl. Regarding the self-reliance angle, there’s a powerful subtext at work there: you’re communicating that you don’t actually need her, for anything other than your entertainment, and that she’s only useful for one thing (and it’s important to make clear what that one thing is).

        And if she’s anything like most modern skanks, chances are she can’t cook, so by demonstrating superior skill, you’re sending the message that you are undeniably superior to her. In other words, dominant, the essential ingredient (ha!).

        As always, it’s all about teh frame. Aloof amusement at her lack of culinary acumen, and making it look easy regardless of effort expended. So long as it’s all about your pleasure and your enjoyment, and you’d be quite content with or without her involvement. She’s just there for dessert…

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 7:26 am Carlos Danger

        Golf clap.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 10:33 pm Ronin

      Use it as a test.

      One girl I knew was 1) a Non-volunteer to jump in on the dishes & 2) Was a brat about being told to do them.

      Result? Next!

      LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 6:27 am The Burninator

      Cooking was a poor choice for the study, traditionally men have always constituted the ranks of the finest chefs in the world, and many major players in history cultivated a fantastic culinary skill.

      I think cooking mundane things is more along the lines of what is being suggested, such as a guy who heats up a can of green beans for the kids, or whatever.

      LikeLike


  4. on February 8, 2014 at 11:09 am Preston

    Ooh! Right in time for #BacktotheKitchen week

    LikeLike


  5. on February 8, 2014 at 11:15 am riseofman

    The downfall of society is upon us. Reminds me of the humanitarians from Atlas Shrugged all over again.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 1:59 pm Matthew King

      Please kill yourself.

      This constant faggoty hand-wringing in lieu of acting is fraying my last nerve.

      We have diagnosed the disease in excruciating, OCD-level detail. Now what are you doing about it?

      Men thrive in times of disruption and upheaval. Are you a man?

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 2:22 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

        Beautiful

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:58 pm YaReally

        “This constant faggoty hand-wringing in lieu of acting is fraying my last nerve.”

        …uhhh isn’t that pretty much your M.O.? Whining instead of taking action? I mean, I agree action is good but how are YOU calling someone else out on complaining instead of acting lol wtf have you done to fix all the shit you cry about?

        ❤

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 9:10 am Pluviophile

        Mr. Really, your wisdom is only surpassed by your ignorance. It’s too damn early to shoot, so words are the weapons.

        Before the first brick smashes into a million shards the glasshouse protecting our lords and masters there will be a million written words that define that bricks trajectory.

        P.S. Love the ‘<3'. Your example is always before us.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:18 pm Matthew King

        ❤ is a drunken, dunce-capped, and depantsed dude passed out on his side, showing the world his ass.

        Take off your St. Valentine's Day blinders.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:26 pm YaReally

        pfffft, I wasn’t drunk. The pantsless part is true tho.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 5:39 am Pluviophile

        pfffft, I wasn’t drunk. The pantsless part is true tho.

        *Hand in air*

        Mr. Really, pick me! Pick me!

        I know the answer! Agree and amplify with a plot twist! And I ❤ ❤ ❤ [see what I did there] how you wove your absolute indifference thru[see what I did again] subtext by using ‘tho’ rather than ‘though’!

        I don’t care what Matt says you teach by example!

        This. [see what I did again]

        Your biggest fan,

        Pluviophile

        ❤ [ I’m showin’ off now!]

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:00 pm Matthew King

        …uhhh isn’t that pretty much your M.O.? Whining instead of taking action? I mean, I agree action is good but how are YOU calling someone else out on complaining instead of acting…

        Uhhh ummm uhhhhh uhhhhh. Are you constipated? Trying to pass a stubborn stool as you think this one out?

        Describe for us what you believe a week in my life is like, particularly with regard to how much effort you imagine I expend complaining versus acting. This could be an illuminating exercise.

        It’s odd — though not unexpected, given that you are a slow-witted, self-proclaimed player and self-anointed guru — that a person would draw certain conclusions from a total uncertainty. You never examine your premises, you never consider the quality of your evidence. You just interject yourself to prove once again how far out of your depth you are when it comes to personal judgment vis-à-vis general concepts.

        Let me put it in terms you’re more likely to understand: What do you truly know about me and how I live?

        I’m not talking about your stitched-together impressions and half-baked assumptions and pua guru bullet-point categories. I’m talking about what you can independently confirm.

        Because if you do sketch out what you imagine my life to be, I wager it will only confirm your dependency on detailed strawmen to make a point in the face of criticism. If I’m wrong, I’m an honest enough fellow to give you the full credit deserved for perspicacity. I will be shocked into giving you a newfound and wholly unexpected respect.

        But I have a sneaking suspicion you can’t even tell when you’re making shit up out of whole cloth, filling in the serious gaps of your wisdom with generic fabrication.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:17 pm Cummings-OralCummings.

        “What do you truly know about me and how I live?” My God! Matt is…Rush Limbaugh!

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:23 pm Matthew King

        A fine tongue-in-cheek example of “stitched-together impressions and half-baked assumptions.” To the extent you earnestly believe this, you too have outed yourself as a front-seat passenger on the perpetual short bus.

        I’d give you the benefit of the doubt, but that’s not the wisest policy on this board.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:42 pm YaReally

        “Are you constipated? Trying to pass a stubborn stool as you think this one out?”

        Yes, it’s a difficult task. If only I could learn to expel shit out of my mouth the way you do, things would be much easier.

        “Describe for us what you believe a week in my life is like”

        “that a person would draw certain conclusions from a total uncertainty.”

        Oh I’m quite certain lol

        “What do you truly know about me and how I live?”

        I’ve met you a thousand times, Matt. You are as unique and special as the goth kid in high school who thinks no one can understand his depth, just like all his goth kid buddies. It’s unfathomable to them how generic and predictable they are to anyone who’s been around.

        Just kidding, you are a unique and special snowflake, just like everyone else.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:16 pm Matthew King

        As I thought. No true powers of perception. All wisdom borrowed and memorized.

        For fucksake, you didn’t even understand the challenge.

        Nothing about what I said was a claim to uniqueness. I was attempting to make you conscious of your reliance on just-so classifications and cartoon categories in lieu of original observation. And how do you respond? With yet one more repetition of the same cartoon category, one more neat and tidy classification.

        No mind for nuance. No aptitude for precision or detailed scrutiny. Just you with three primary colors on your palette, painting by numbers and trying your mongoloid best to stay in the lines.

        And yet, for all the many commenters, critics, contrarians, and pua pooh-poohers on these pages, for some reason you always volunteer to interject yourself into my conversations. That does make me a special snowflake of sorts, in your eyes anyway.

        In fact, your infatuation with calling me out/proving me wrong is evidence contrary to your claim.

        But then, as we all know, don’t pay attention to what a chick says. Watch what she does.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:28 pm YaReally

        @Matt

        “For fucksake, you didn’t even understand the challenge.”

        Oh I did. I just don’t care. “WHY WONT U PLAY MY GAEM???!!! IMBECILIEE!!!” lol

        “for some reason you always volunteer to interject yourself into my conversations.”

        I’m just trying to get in your pants.

        “But then, as we all know, don’t pay attention to what a chick says. Watch what she does.”

        Shit, you zung me there. Another scathing reply! I must go nurse my wounds and contemplate the bleak meaninglessness of my existence.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:46 pm Matthew King

        Yeah. The sarcasm and the “doth protest too much” behavior doesn’t hide your pattern of infatuation. You’re only highlighting it.

        More exclamation points next time.

        (But leave the capslock to Hustla.)

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:48 pm ACG1

        I’m confused. How does one ‘take action’ on an internet forum, much less one where there’s no one to preach to except fellow members of the proverbial choir?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:35 pm Matthew King

        An internet forum is not the place to take this kind of action, no one said it was. But it can become a cathartic release, a place to get frustration off a man’s chest rather, which eliminates the spur to do something about the source of his frustration. I plead guilty to it myself.

        But the true danger is when complaining becomes the raison d’être of the exchange — where we fuel, stoke, and mutually satisfy our anger rather than channeling it into sober strategy. There is no value-addition in enthusiastic agreement and restatement, but it generates the great temptation to leave a problem to fester once one’s opposition is publicly registered/acknowledged.

        Moreover, those who establish a pattern of complaint are not contributing to the work that can be done here, which is the aggregation of suggested courses of action, rather than the umpteenth diagnosis of what everyone here, by virtue of their presence, already recognizes is the challenge.

        I’m not saying the temptation is unique to this fellow. Indeed, the host himself indulges in impotent protest from time to time. Calling it a “shiv” doesn’t make it draw actual blood. Words are for rallying, but after a time, the pep-rally carries itself away on its own self-justification. That’s the difference between activity and activism. “I did my part! I put on a bumper sticker!”

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2014 at 11:39 pm Grim

        Matt I keep asking you , here and at femx ,what do we do , and you never reply.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 3:27 pm Scray

      lol loser

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 6:38 pm FamilyMan

      Agree with the other comments. But as long as it’s all going to hell, go get some pussy.

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 1:08 pm Matthew King

      @riseofman:

      Sleeping on it, brother, I was too harsh. I lift the injunction to kill yourself.

      The abrupt halt to my patience is a spillover from weariness with other, far more fatalistic commenters who can’t tap the pause button on their morose complaining. You haven’t been around long enough (that I’ve seen, anyway) to have joined the club of panicky pissants who bond over “The Sky Is Falling!!!” apocalyptica, for whom I have little time and tolerance.

      Matt

      LikeLike


  6. on February 8, 2014 at 11:19 am tteclod

    From the article.

    “It bothered her that her husband acknowledged being turned on by watching the fantasy online but not by doing it in real life with her. “I felt so rejected,” she said. “I told him, ‘I want you to want to dominate me,’ but he said he just doesn’t see me that way, that he doesn’t see us that way.” ”

    You can’t fool men with play-acting. If you want to be a sex slave, be a sex slave. You can’t fake that for a “scene” then go back to being a bitch.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 11:37 am Preston

      Cathedral-inspired indoctrination = “I love being dominated in the bedroom, but in-charge/independent/’50-50′ in other aspects of the relationship.”

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 12:39 pm tteclod

        Yep.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 2:23 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

      Don’t just blame the bitch. The wimp’s at a greater fault there.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 2:42 pm tteclod

        Sure, he’s fully at fault: that’s part of red pill. You’re the man, which means you’re in charge, which means if she’s not doing what you want, you’re at fault. No kidding. Thing is, the writer’s a woman, unmarried, dating a guy who comprehends, yet still relates these anecdotes as if she’s ignorant.

        Guys, I don’t worry about my boy; he’ll follow example and take instructions. I worry about my daughter, whose head might come off with a gentle push from some dyke professor if I bother to send her to college so she can educate children.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 5:01 pm FamilyMan

        I’ve only got sons, I can hardly imagine what it’s like to raise a daughter these days. Strength!

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 5:12 pm preston87

        Chicken-or-egg situation.

        The wimp’s been indoctrinated to the same degree about ‘equality.’ Blame the wimp, yes – but at greatest fault is societal conditioning… which was formulated by wimps.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:04 pm Gro Haila

        wimps “propagated”, but sure like hell did not formulate it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:03 pm corvinus

        True. In this case she was actually telling him not to be a wimp, and he refused to listen.

        Wow. Just wow. (ha.)

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 7:02 pm YaReally

        Agreed. Dude’s fault. Separate bedroom from reality…merging the two is what gay socially conditioned dudes do and it’s why they can’t let loose and fuck good, cause the guy is all “omg she was like such and such during sex and now I can’t not see her that way when we’re having lunch!!!!”

        Sure it’s convenient when a chick is the same in and out of the bedroom, but a guy should be able to take a chick who’s dominant outside of the bedroom and dominate her inside it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 7:34 pm Hunter

        Hey YaReally, left a FR here, just wondering your thoughts https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/psychopath-game/#comment-527099

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 7:30 am Carlos Danger

        What she really craves is a man who dominates her all the time.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:08 pm YaReally

        Nah, the captain can let other people steer the ship, as long as it’s heading in the right direction. When it starts to go off course, it’s time for the captain to put it back on track, but then he can let his subordinates maintain it.

        It’s similar to how in a group conversation you can let the lesser men hold court, as long as what they’re saying leads things in the direction you want (or at least doesn’t put things off course). And how in seduction you can let the woman lead the conversation, as long as she’s leading it in a direction that benefits you and your goals…when she goes off-track, you put her back on track, and let her continue from there.

        It’s fine to delegate and only expend as much effort as is required to achieve the goal. You don’t have to be “on” 24/7.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 3:28 pm Scray

      Wow this chick is practically begging the guy to save/help the marriage. What an idiot. “I don’t see us that way.” Faggot.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 7:48 pm Harland

      Not her fault…directly. She wanted a caring, sensitive man who genuinely believes in equality. She got one. Now she’s unsatisfied. Boo-hoo.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 8:03 pm tteclod

        Yep.

        LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 9:24 am Amy

      The madonna/whore complex. More men have it than you think.

      [CH: And for good evolutionary reason.]

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 9:36 am Amy

        Maybe, but it’s bad for LTRs and marriage, I think. Women can be sexually adventurous and monogamous. People think they’re mutually exclusive and that is absolutely false.

        [CH: Sexual adventurism is not the same as slutty promiscuity. The data, and field experience, strongly suggest that non-Madonnas with multiple sex partners are bigger infidelity risks inside marriage.]

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 12:11 pm Amy

        I agree that sexual adventurism is not the same as slutty promiscuity, but a guy with madonna/whore complex doesn’t see the difference.

        [CH: That’s something women tell themselves. Fact is, most men are very good at sussing out the livewire sluts.]

        Like the guy in the article who has trouble being rough in bed with his wife even though she’s asking for it. He might be able to act that way with a slutty gf or a prostitute, but he can’t with her because he doesn’t see her that way. That’s the madonna/whore complex.

        [These types of men and their relationships are the exception to the rule. Most complaints men have are that their wives aren’t nearly as adventurous as they are in the sack.]

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:07 am Kate

        Yeah. It reminds me of the Charlotte/Trey plot line.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 10:14 am The Burninator

        It’s not a ‘complex’. “Complex” suggests some sort of clinical psychosis or illness. Rather, it’s a simple truth expressed in an easy to understand quip.

        If you cannot act like civilized in public while hanging on my arm (don’t curse like a sailor, don’t spit, don’t cut me down in front of others, wear nice clothes and not “boy clothes” etc), I have no use for you. If you cannot be a wild banshee in bed and beg me to fuck you for the fifth time that night, preferring instead to curl up night after night in flannel “jammies” and pet the cat, then I have no use for you.

        Madonna in public, whore in the bedroom, and all will be perfect in your life with your man. Anything else is a source of huge issues in a relationship, and likely will either chase your man away, or turn him into a wuss beta in short order.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 10:29 am Amy

        I don’t think you know what it is. It’s not the women’s issue; it’s the man’s. He sees his gf/wife as a saintly being that can’t be “debased” sexually. Obviously you don’t have this problem, which is great, but I’m not sure what you’re trying to tell me in your post.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 1:13 pm tteclod

        I’ll provide a little commentary since I started this thread and CH is wrong.

        CH wrote, “[Men have the Madonna/whore complex] for good evolutionary reason.”

        Men who are “sexually adventurous” privately but publicly chaste (read: dull) are not going to be sexually successful. Good fucking might interest a girl if she stumbles into it, but a man’s got to get a girl first, and that takes some public “alpha” displays. If you’re a “real man” then you’re not faking an “alpha” façade; you’re just being your usual alpha self. This is the source of the admonition “fake it until you make it,” which may be reworded to “do everything an alpha man does until you’re an alpha man.” A man playing Madonna/whore isn’t “faking” alpha: a man should be straight-up “Man” at all times. I submit that the mother of Jesus of Nazareth may be either chaste or debauched, depending on whether one accepts the assertion that she conceived him while a virgin; either way she’s female, not male.

        [CH: The Madonna/whore complex refers to male perception of female behavior, and as such can’t be analogized to male behavior that influences female perception. FACT: Women who have had a lot of sex partners are higher infidelity risks than women with fewer past partners. Men – white and asian men at any rate — are evolved to look for signals of fidelity in women especially as pertains to the search for a long term partner. Sluts do offer the prospect of easy short term flings, so men who might undervalue a slut for marriage will overvalue her for a one night stand.]

        LikeLike


  7. on February 8, 2014 at 11:19 am Kim du Toit

    The article was written by Lori Gottlieb, who was earlier excoriated by the feministocals for having the temerity to suggest that women should marry the man who’s available, rather than holding out for Mr. Perfect. (Also interesting: she found her boyfriend on the Internet.)

    LikeLike


  8. on February 8, 2014 at 12:05 pm CAPSLOCK HUSTLA

    WHEN THIS ARTICLE FIRST CAME OUT, I SUBMITTED AN APPROPRIATELY MEEK AND BETA COMMENT WITH A LINK BACK TO THE MAIN PAGE HERE.

    THEY NOT ONLY DIDN’T APPROVE IT, THEY BANNED MY ACCOUNT.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 12:28 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

      Your comment apparently wasn’t beta enough for the slavering cunts and manginas at the Noo Yawk Times.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 1:02 pm L. Jon Hubbard

        They censor very heavily there. It’s so bad that once when they did an article on Iran the rift in the comments was between people saying, “we shoulda turned Tehran into glass yesterday” and the cooler heads — “we’d better bomb them soon or they’re going to nuke the world”.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 2:38 pm irishsavant

        The massive censorship also renders many comment threads meaningless, as the catalyst for the ‘responses’ has been removed.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 3:36 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        Substitute “Red State/conservative/TeaParty” for “Iran” and you can see their true intentions.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 8:33 pm Jay in DC

        Noo Yawk Times

        Jew York Times, FTFY again, 2nd time today. If I can do it again before I’m done scrolling down I can get the Hat Trick for today at least.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 2:02 pm Matthew King

      Hrm. Hrrrrmmmmm.

      I am sure it was not your tone or content.

      AUTO-BAN FOR UPPERCASE BLOCKS OF TEXT. BUT NEVER LET IT CRAMP YOUR STYLE, HUSTLA. BEST PERSONA IN THE COMBOXES.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 2:53 pm CAPSLOCK HUSTLA

        I KNOW MY POSTING STYLE IS TOO PATRIARCHAL FOR THE NYT EVEN WITH A PREEMPTIVE TRIGGER WARNING. SO I EMPLOYED LOWER CASE, FAXED IN MY COMMENT FROM AN APPLE PRODUCT, AND CHANNELED MATT YGLESIAS AS BEST I COULD.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 3:36 pm Canadian Friend

        If your capslockion lasts more than four hours, consult a doctor.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:02 pm corvinus

        hahaha

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:28 pm Matthew King

        Bah. That’s phallophobic feminist advice. You don’t need no doctors, just keep ballin n hustlin.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 11:29 pm tang3zang

      Join the club. I’ve had like 10 accounts banned on the NYT, I wasn’t even mean or anything. Liberals are just cowards like that.

      LikeLike


  9. on February 8, 2014 at 12:06 pm Uncle Elmer

    Maybe people just fight more often when the man does not lend a hand in domestic chores, and the fighting leads to more sex.

    Personally I have found women to experience a strange cocktail of hormonal mood swings and adrenal excitement when they are pissed off. It leads to confrontation, and depending on your demeanor during response, can end up getting quite passionate.

    I have mentioned also the observation that an intense psychotic outburst from a woman is often followed by befuddled docility, as if she received electro-shock to the forebrain.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 1:07 pm Arbiter

      It has nothing to do with fighting more. And nothing shows that fighting more would lead to great sex, other than some porn-novel fantasy you may have read. If you are going to make a statement like that, show the research or GTFO. There is scientific truth in the Real Talk manosphere, but that truth is diluted when people just tack on their own “this is the way it is!” guesswork with no proof.

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 1:19 pm Hugh G. Rection

      I have mentioned also the observation that an intense psychotic outburst from a woman is often followed by befuddled docility, as if she received electro-shock to the forebrain.

      I think that’s when the realization hits that she’s acting like a fucking psycho. Unless you play into her frame and get defensive or something…

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 2:33 pm Tilikum

      its in the switch to overt vs. covert communication that has been well discussed here and at RM. also, an amygdala hijack has been proven to show a 10-15 point IQ drop as bloodflow rerouts from your prefrontal lobe and activates your emotion circuits. if you get pissed and/or scared, you also get dumber and more susceptible and suggestive as your executive functions dull.

      any and all emotions are good emotions.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 10:39 pm FamilyMan

        I can only recall one time I experienced amygdala hijack, and I would say it was many times a 10-15 point IQ drop. Are you describing just a partial hijack, like being generally pissed or scared? Then I think it’s still more than 10-15 points, it really takes the edge off.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 7:13 am Tilikum

        broads live almost entirely in their emotional circuits, pushing them into it is easy. limited executive functions as it is.

        you want the truth…..get her good and pissed off and screaming mad. they can’t help but give it to ya.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 2:54 pm AKA

      My experience backs that up as well. A well handled confrontation can indeed lead to tingles. It’s all about how you handle it tho. Don’t lose your cool during the confrontation.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 3:48 pm Scray

        Nah. You can lose your cool, just don’t give in or back down.

        LikeLike


  10. on February 8, 2014 at 12:10 pm Uncle Elmer

    Maybe the couple in the NYT stock photo would copulate more if he wore manly underwear or just went nude, instead of the girly pajamas he is wearing.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 12:16 pm Scott

      I agree. Women are nothing if not captives to fashion and superficial role playing. Dress like Mike Rowe in Dirty Jobs, even if you can’t screw in a lightbulb. Watch her panties fall…

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 12:17 pm Uncle Elmer

      Here is some work from the NYT photographer worthy of a caption contest :

      http://craigcutler.com/#/portfolios/print/still/editorial/cosmo/img/0

      http://craigcutler.com/#/portfolios/print/still/editorial/cosmo/img/2

      LikeLike


  11. on February 8, 2014 at 12:17 pm Chad

    This piece of satire from The Onion sums it up – http://www.theonion.com/video/report-rising-number-of-weak-emasculated-men-worki,35193/

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 5:56 pm corvinus

      CH, do you work for The Onion? If not, you should.

      LikeLike


  12. on February 8, 2014 at 12:32 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

    Outmaneuvered again by CH.

    From a purely journalistic standpoint this story is a complete embarrassment for the NY Times. No doubt this is one reason it’s increasingly irrelevant.

    These libs and progs aren’t too bright, are they?

    LikeLike


  13. on February 8, 2014 at 12:52 pm Mr Lizard

    After seeing that article I actually seriously think that some NYT reporter is a secret Heartiste inside man.

    LikeLike


  14. on February 8, 2014 at 1:05 pm Grit

    “A study called “Egalitarianism, Housework and Sexual Frequency in Marriage,” which appeared in The American Sociological Review last year, surprised many, precisely because it went against the logical assumption that as marriages improve by becoming more equal, the sex in these marriages will improve, too.”

    Newspapers need to go back to the edit room when they try to pass “logical assumption” as journalistic research.

    I frequently see this more and more often, to a frustrating degree; that in terms of feminism, the organization doesn’t want to take responsibility for what they write. So you get heresay schpeel like “logical assumption”, “it is commonly understood”, “ask any person and you will find”, “We were shocked to discover”, and so forth.

    On second thought, maybe these articles full of heresay have indeed passed through the edit room; right through the hands of powerful men who do not believe an ounce of feminism, but prefer to publish whatever slop fills the trough for the masses.

    LikeLike


  15. on February 8, 2014 at 1:10 pm Arbiter

    Anyone think the owners of the New York Times follow their anti-male beta advice? Of course not. They all use their position to get women and have their favorite prostitutes on the side. They all spawn some children for the Tribe with their first wives, then divorce them and marry a younger and more attractive White or Asian woman. Sumner Redstone was the first to make me aware of that fact.

    LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 10:10 am Edward Waverley

      “Sumner Rothstein was the first to make me aware of that fact.”

      FTFY

      LikeLike


  16. on February 8, 2014 at 1:12 pm Aquila

    And people think the Bible is backwards when it talks about how acting like the opposite sex is almost always an abomination or something. Those fools, they don’t understand that it’s ancient wisdom. Humanity cannot be happy apart from nature, and it’s human nature for women to be men’s helpmate, not an equal.

    On a side note, this blog and others like it have given me a near-perfectly tuned sense of relationship health. When my friend and his wife created a diaper changing schedule to ensure HE did his “fair share,” I knew things were doomed. In no time he found himself in the office of a divorce lawyer. When my other friend told his wife to make us a good dinner with a good desert afterwards, yes told her, not asked her, she did it (and it was good), and I knew they’d be a healthy couple. We were happy, she was happy, everyone was happy. Nature… don’t fight it, embrace it.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 1:36 pm cynthia

      Maybe the problem isn’t as much with the act of changing diapers themselves, but the attitude that there’s a “fair share” of nasty chores that a man must do to “prove himself.”

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 1:37 pm cynthia

        As in, any woman who would actually make a changing schedule like that in order to keep tabs on her man is a bitch anyway.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 2:53 pm Aquila

        I agree, there are of course times a man should change a diaper. I went home for Christmas and wound up getting stuck with my newborn nephew for a few days for some reason and it was what it was…

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:39 pm FamilyMan

        Yes, having brought kids thru the diaper stage, you pitch in to get it done. But yes the schedule thing sounds negative. Too damn bad for the kid who will grow up in a broken home because of this adult weakness. Really a damned shame.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 4:06 pm Scray

      Nah, you went too far….pretty common in the manosphere. Yes, men shouldn’t be women and vice versa…but I think they’re equal. Neither is better or worse, they just complement one another.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 4:51 pm Aquila

        I disagree. They’re not equal. The man was made to be in authority, therefore the woman is not his equal. I am not the equal of the President, he is in authority and I am not. I accept this. We need to accept our place in the hierarchy of human society. Men aren’t “better” than women just like the President isn’t “better” than me, but the fact remains that we’re not equal. Women compliment men, but I would not say men compliment women. Woman was MADE for man, man was not literally made for woman. Woman was made as a helpmate and companion for man, man was not made as a helpmate for woman, but rather as a companion AND a ruler over her.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:07 pm Aquila

        I agree with you that neither is better or worse. However, since the male is meant to be in charge, it means they’re by nature not equal. The woman was made as a helpmate for the man, and a companion, not to be his equal. They compliment one another, but, only from a position of inequality, where the man is above the woman and the woman submits to his headship.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:22 pm Lee Min Ho

        What of the woman have a higher IQ ?

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:52 pm Aquila

        IQ does not confer authority. We don’t flip God’s order, or the order of nature, just because of IQ. That’s absurd. Women of a higher IQ can use their intelligence within their own rightful place. A high IQ also doesn’t automatically make someone a good leader. In the military I’ve seen some good military leaders who can hardly read or write, and some highly intelligent Lieutenants who’d get you killed in minutes.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 8:42 pm Orthodox

        Then the line from My Greek Wedding: “The man is the head, but the woman is the neck and she can turn the head anyway she wants.” Generals aren’t promoted based on IQ.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 9:51 pm FamilyMan

        In the upper half of the IQ distribution, that’s rare although not impossible. I don’t know if a woman could be happy if her IQ is much higher, you ‘d have to ask women in that situation if they’ve made it work.

        It’s rare because women look more for intelligence in a man, while men look for a hot body. So a model who’s dumb as a horse has options (though not as many as some men seem to think.) She’ll marry a guy who is smarter than she is. Geeky smart women, unfortunately and even tragically, are aging out. They have good genetic material and probably aren’t used up either. Men should look for such girls when they’re fertile.

        The semi-hot stupid party girls age out, and I don’t care about that at all.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 12:03 pm cynthia

        It makes life very, very hard for the woman.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 10:13 am Edward Waverley

        I wouldn’t recommend dating a woman who has higher IQ than you. It can be as emasculating as dating one who makes more.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 11:50 am guerrer0

        Previously I only thanked Aquila for his reply, a bit rude from me, now 고맙습니다 everyone else 🙂

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 8:01 pm Lee Min Ho

        Aquila?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 3:09 am Scray

        In charge of what, though. For example, the general management of the house falls to the woman. Little rules about this and that — if she’s doing all the chores, she’s the one who has implemented a system.

        The man interfaces with reality, i.e. the world beyond the home. All decisions in this sphere are the man’s. The woman takes care of the inner workings of the home, and she’s going to have the majority say in it. The woman is also going to have a lot of say in child rearing — the man has more say than he probably does in the home workings, but still it’s more the woman’s show. The father’s presence, while strong, is ideally a little distant.

        So ya, I don’t buy into the ‘unequal’ line of thinking. Different strengths/weaknesses/roles.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 9:24 am Lee Min Ho

        How does my point make you feel Aquila? you still haven’t answered my question? Do you feel ashamed?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 9:55 am Aquila

        Damn Lee, not everyone stalks the page like you do. Anyway, higher IQ does not confer authority. I’ve known Army Sergeants who could barely read yet they could lead men in battle and win, and I’ve known officers who were extremely book smart but had almost no leadership qualities. IQ doesn’t automatically equal leadership.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 12:50 pm FamilyMan

        You seem quite butthurt, little lady. I am going to check out Aquila’s blog …

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:33 pm Aquila

        IQ does not overturn the natural order of things. I’ve known low IQ NCO’s in the Army who were nonetheless brilliant leaders of men, who could win battles and keep you alive. I’ve also known booksmart geniuses who were officers and would likely get you killed quite quickly because of their inability to lead. As a helpmate, a woman with a higher IQ could be a great asset and could use that IQ within her realm of responsibility to do things excellently.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 6:21 pm thwack

        what color are you?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 6:43 pm Pluviophile

        Sir thwackalot,

        He’s white, but if you’re a good negro he’ll offer his white daughter to you.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 8:46 pm guerrer0

        감사 ! Aquila ; )

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:40 pm FamilyMan

        Scray, where is it ever necessary to assume men and women are equal? How does this doubtful idea ever solve a problem?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 3:17 am Scray

        Assuming men and women are equal as the sum of their strengths and weaknesses helps to solve several problems. First of all, you want to avoid misogyny, which is just butthurt bitterness. Second of all, you stop assuming that game is an adversarial process to try and “conquer” someone else. It becomes an exercise in trying to suss out those natural complementary elements.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 11:16 am FamilyMan

        Scray, why would I want to “avoid misogyny”? Women certainly don’t avoid misandry, and no I’m not going to “be the bigger man”. If you just eliminated the “misogyny” meme from your thinking, flushed it away, you might solve some of the doubts and confusion I’ve been reading from you lately.

        Get down in the trenches and play the game. Unless you want to avoid the whole thing, including relations with the opposite sex, and be a monk for a while. I did that myself when I was in engineering school, but that’s because I didn’t have time or energy for it, and the available women were way beyond horrible. You don’t have such problems.

        Whether game is adversarial or not is a different question that doesn’t relate much to whether men and women are equal. But if you want to engage in male-female relationships from a male role without doing any conquering, I foresee a lot of trouble for you. You won’t stimulate attraction, and in its absence, you’ll stimulate revulsion.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:13 pm irishsavant

        “when I was in engineering school……….. the available women were way beyond horrible.”

        ALL women in engineering and the hard sciences are about 45% male, if not always in appearance, always in mentality.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 8:41 pm FamilyMan

        and privileged beyond belief, that’s some hard pussy to get and not desirable if you can keep in mind what things are like in the rest of the world.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 10:22 am Amy

        Of course you want to avoid misogyny, by its strict definition (not the feminist definition). You can be a dominant, alpha guy without being a misogynist. Real hatred and contempt for women wafts off a guy like a smell. Not many men are like this, but when I run across one I can’t get away fast enough.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 11:07 am Scray

        Avoid misogyny for the same reason you avoid pedestalization.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:18 pm YaReally

        “It becomes an exercise in trying to suss out those natural complementary elements.”

        Agreed. The type of woman I would have settled with before I had any experience with women was a very different type than I would choose to settle with now. But over time as I’ve learned more about myself, I’ve learned which attributes in women compliment/balance mine and so I screen for those attributes. The most solid relationships I’ve seen have been the ones where both people know their role and happily embrace those roles regardless of what other people think.

        Why force a square peg into a round hole? There are literally billions of pegs out there, enjoy looking thru them till you find a round peg instead.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 9:15 pm FamilyMan

        An excellent attitude.

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 4:36 pm Lara

      I think women changing the diapers must be an old school thing. When my grandfather would watch my son, he’d do everything, give him a bottle, hold him, rock him, but he’d never change his diaper. If my grandmother wasn’t there, it didn’t get done.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 9:18 pm FamilyMan

        I hardly changed any either, but I did change a few. My wife seemed to think it was hers to do, so she did it. There were a few times I had to do it. I can’t see anything unmanly about making helping your baby be clean and comfortable once in a while.

        LikeLike


  17. on February 8, 2014 at 1:15 pm Operation Reinhard

    More like Jew York Times.

    Publisher: Arthur Sulzberger Jr.
    Managing Editor: Jill Abramson
    Opinion Editor: Andrew Rosenthal

    author of this piece: Lori Gottlieb

    Disgusting jew junkmedia. “Cathedral”? I think you mean synagogue. Next time try naming the jew.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 10:37 pm thwack

      One day I turned on the tee-vee and it was a show where a joo host was interveiwing a joo guest about a book a joo author wrote about a famous joo.

      Joo just can’t make this shit up.

      LikeLike


  18. on February 8, 2014 at 1:45 pm Flashing Lights

    I skimmed through the beta times article. Especially noting some of the anecdotes from other couples the writer summarizes…

    Each and every one of those guys’ issues in their sex life would be resolved by reading this blog. By knowing that women like to be dominated by a man in control.

    Come to think of it, most of the situations in the article can be fixed by those guys learning what a shit test is and how to sidestep them to give the women what they’re really asking for.

    LikeLike


  19. on February 8, 2014 at 2:15 pm Scray

    It’s actually terrible. The sheer amount of effort that goes into strange propaganda is insane; ‘X still sexy at 40! X sexy at 60! ‘ magazine covers, ‘this is what real women look like’ nonsense, stories about how men should do an equal amount of whatever bullshit. Just a huge assault on nature.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 2:34 pm Tilikum

      the price for ignorance is steep when the need for delusion is deep eh?

      LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 5:54 pm corvinus

      There was just one about Christie Brinkley. Never mind the fact that she’s 100% sterile now, is airbrushed up the wazoo, and uses hair extensions.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:08 pm Scray

        That’s exactly the one I saw the other day. I just laughed at how inappropriate it was

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 7:21 am Baby

      I don’t understand why women buy into this. Who even wants to be sexy at 60? A post-menopausal woman trying to be “sexy” is a grotesque parody (see: Madonna). A 60-year-old woman should be kind and nurturing, bake cookies, and give hugs and advice to her kids and grandkids.

      When my brother was in his early 20s, he and his friends would often get hit on by 40+ divorcee cougars in bars. The women would be horrified if they heard the disgust in these young men’s voices describing them. They didn’t like the idea of women their mothers/grandmothers age acting like cheap sluts.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 11:24 am FamilyMan

        Well Christie Brinkley has a problem. Having driven away three or four husbands, she finds herself alone at age 60, so just like the women in nursing homes, she must compete for the attention of men.

        Women who cannot do without male companionship “buy into it”. That’s almost all women, apparently. The solution to these cougars’ problem lay earlier, when they should have locked down a good man in their 20’s and valued him properly.

        Now they do go around acting like sluts, and our media cover for this the best they can, but it is what it is. If you can’t hold them off with a stick, use two sticks.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 11:51 am Grim

        This

        LikeLike


  20. on February 8, 2014 at 3:54 pm Lara

    I think it isn’t so much the man doing housework, that’s a turn off, as the woman not doing it, and turning him off.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 2:17 pm CH

      Women don’t cease being sexual gatekeepers once married. If amount of sex is down, it’s most likely because the wife doesn’t want it.

      LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 11:03 am Charlie Dont Surf

      Housework is drudgery. Yard-work is drudgery. Shopping is drudgery.

      Having sex with a wizened hausfrau is drudgery.

      Having sex with a sweaty, greasy, domestic animal life-form is drudgery.

      Showering together is a turn-on.

      Breakfast-in-bed is a turn-on.

      Clean white panties are a turn-on.

      A well stocked fridge, wine cellar and firewood rack – is a turn-on.

      Baby, That was terrific … now fetch me one of those hand towels I folded.

      LikeLike


  21. on February 8, 2014 at 3:55 pm Nicole

    It’s very odd that this is a surprise. Many people seem to think “equality” means everything must be exactly the same. They don’t understand that it is a concept,a paradigm about peoples/societies relations with each other, not a concrete “thing” to be achieved. Men and women are not equal, but both sexes have their value, their “sphere of influence” in which they are superior to the other. Society seems to have also forgotten that a masculine man and a feminine women create a team, a gestalt, that is greater then the sum of it’s parts. Why would society want to sacrifice this unit( with each member strengthening the whole by contributing what they are best at) by trying to make the individuals weaker by being “the same”.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 5:53 pm Gro Haila

      Because working childless females are so, so, so, sooo useful at driving the price of labor down and profits up, up, UP!

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 6:48 pm Cranky Cat

        Not to mention how useful they are for keeping a trinket-based consumer “economy” running.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 12:17 am ACG1

      Well said. Feminists love to parrot the line “how could you NOT be a feminist? We just want the sexes to be equal!” Which is horribly misleading, because to most people, equal simply means treated the same under the law. But to feminists, equal means that all of life’s outcomes must be identical for men and women… 50.8% of every profession must consist of women, female athletes must be as relevant as their male counterparts, domestic duties must not be gendered, etc. All of which is only reasonable if you believe (as feminists do) that there are no behaviors or abilities linked to biological sex, a doctrine with as much scientific credibility as the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Yet Dems continue to align themselves with the feminist crowd, all while calling themselves the “party of science.” What a joke.

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 10:25 am Edward Waverley

        To be fair, the Bible is as profoundly anti-feminist as true science is. In the realm of hardwired sex differences, there is no quarrel between the Bible and science.

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 2:18 pm irishsavant

      “Why would society want to sacrifice this unit…….by trying to make the individuals weaker by being “the same”.”

      “Society” isn’t doing it…..the people who are trying to destroy society are the perps.

      LikeLike


  22. on February 8, 2014 at 4:17 pm BlackPoisonSoul

    Always enjoyable when the lamestream media has a mental meltdown and ends up going wubwubwub in the corner. There needs to be a prize for going Full Retard™, like the wooden spoon awards.

    LikeLike


  23. on February 8, 2014 at 4:20 pm bigdickeddeadgordon

    The guys over at Manboobz who scrub the dishes while yelling “Honey, I’m nearly done. Can I have some sexual intercourse this evening?” are in for a shock.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 6:50 pm Cranky Cat

      Nah. They’ll just ignore the news, or they’ll rationalize it they same way they don’t get Game: “Well, ok, that kind of thing might work on some women, but never on StrongIndependentLiberated ones like my Snoogums”.

      LikeLike


  24. on February 8, 2014 at 4:25 pm Cranky Cat

    As I read the New Beta Times emission, could not help but imagine the writer curled up typing it with an iPad, while nursing a cup of cocoa and wearing a plaid onsie pajama. Arched eyebrows in surprise at the data optional.

    LikeLike


  25. on February 8, 2014 at 5:53 pm Troubadour

    Reading the old post he linked, yes indeed, I’m married to a frumpy plain jane cow. A year ago, I was a totally emasculated pussy, and a couple nights ago I had a very long and detailed talk with her about the girl ten times prettier and half her age that I might still bang eventually (she pinged me after three weeks of radio silence from me). I had all the emotion of a discussion about the weather, even as I was sticking daggers into my poor cow wife’s precious little soul.

    My point is I just got my dick sucked a few minutes ago. Even the plain jane cows are more responsive to a dickwad, even if the dickwad was a wuss for 19 straight years.

    Dread game, I guess. Outcome independence. I’m not even trying to get the cow to transform herself anymore. I’m just trying to get mine. But I’ll take a hummer when one is offered. Watching a woman who used to literally take my dick out of her mouth and scrub the droplets of pre-come off with a rag every few seconds go bug-eyed when I blast a load down her throat amuses me for some reason.

    Chuckle.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 9:58 pm FamilyMan

      There’s hope. Maybe you can start liking each other again. Maybe. Or maybe you’ll move on. Any kids still at home?

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 6:19 am Troubadour

        One 20 year old son, one 17 year old daughter.

        I got an attack of horny tonight, and wanted to have sex before I’d cracked open the first beer. That was uncharacteristic. So I told her, “I guess today is your lucky day. Come here.” Then I led her to the bedroom, guided her over to her side of the bed, jerked her pants and panties down, and pushed her backwards onto the bed.

        “What the hell?,” she said. Then I dropped my drawers and produced an erection. “Oh!,” she replied. Then I fucked the shit out of her for 30 minutes. She actually squirted. That was a first. Afterwards, she said, “Thank you! Damn you’re good!”

        So she got a terrific fuck, and I got to watch a bunch of flab jiggle and sway, and in particular I got to scrutinize her highly exciting collar of neck blubber. That thing has grown way beyond a double chin, and it’s more like a lawn mower tire of fat around her neck.

        I’m getting ripped off in this deal.

        So far, I haven’t succeeded in cultivating any other options. The fate of the marriage comes down to that. I’d rather spend the money I’m saving on something a lot more fun than a divorce, and my wife has accepted the new deal sensibly enough. The problem is finding girls who aren’t put off by the ring.

        Somebody is going to be pretty damn lucky though. If I can do this with a sac of blubber I can barely look at without my penis shriveling to a raisin, just imagine what I could do with a hot chick. Wow. She won’t walk right for a week.

        LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 9:38 am newly aloof

      Freaking hilarious, man! Do you think she just didn’t care enough about your feelings to loose the weight or has she always been fat, or did she try and just fail to loose the weight? If she did put on the weight gradually, I wonder how much of it was that she didn’t give a fuck if she was pleasing the pushover beta she was married to, ya know?

      LikeLike


  26. on February 8, 2014 at 6:11 pm Like a G-6

    Seems like the addage “Treat a lady like a whore, and a whore like a lady” applies amply here…

    LikeLike


  27. on February 8, 2014 at 7:14 pm dsgntd_plyr

    The NYT comment thread is amusing:

    “B-b-b-but I’m happy!!! I mean my life-partner and I aren’t all over each other since we eliminated gender roles and become equal partners, but, uh, we’re happy with our companionate cohabitation. REALLY WE’RE HAPPY!!!”

    LikeLike


  28. on February 8, 2014 at 7:23 pm Joe E. Hall

    Men and women reported having sex an average of about five times a month. For those couples in which the wife does all the traditionally female housework, husbands and wives reported having sex 1.6 times more a month than those where the husband does a larger share of those chores.

    LikeLike


  29. on February 8, 2014 at 8:23 pm Henry Jones

    Eh… I know some chefs who are pretty alpha (the top chefs in the world, actually…maybe that’s the point…) but that’s not me. I hunt and gather, I don’t cook. In general… if you’re cooking, you’re rationalizing how you should be an alpha. Leave it to the chicks…

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 9:00 pm CGS

      Meh, You misunderstand cooking… and likely being alpha. Alpha is state ownership. Creating is alpha, whether it be a painting, software, a ballad or a meal – the act of situational optimization is what makes men persevere. Tastebuds evolved the same way that appearances have – to satisfy a biological imperative. The palette has evolved to select foods that will sustain life. Like the bad boy drummer and the misunderstood poet, the chef capitalizes on the sensory overload created by his endeavors.

      You have not brought your hunting and gathering full circle. Understanding the entire process from capture to consumption is what differentiates the sheep from the shepherd. At any point both can provide nourishment, however the shepherd possesses the ability to provide more than just nutrition. He provides both nourishment and nutrition.

      LikeLike


  30. on February 8, 2014 at 8:27 pm FamilyMan

    OT: watch the 15 year old Russian girl Yulia Lipnitskaya, their women’s skating star. She could be the best female skater ever.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 8:48 pm FamilyMan

      And not entirely surprislngly, the American Ashlee Wagner who skated well for her ability but is not remotely comparable, hints she’s going to lawyer (“I know what scores my program is capable of when skated well, so I’m going to have to check the protocols”) about why she got a much lower score.

      Ashlee, I hope your comment is held against you in the judging of your future skating. American legalism should not overcome the touch of God in skating performance or anything else.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 4:17 pm Grim

        Good fuck you’re strange

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 8:49 pm Adriana Esteves

      GO BRAZIL

      LikeLike


  31. on February 8, 2014 at 8:59 pm Customer Service

    | Biological race differences

    White people can only notice biological race differences if they’re positive. Example… Blacks are more athletic, better in basketball, musical, good dancers. But if it’s negative then they always blame themselves…. the white school system failed them, white privelege overlooks them. It’s comical really.

    I wonder how black people in Asia fare, or in India.

    LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 9:37 pm FamilyMan

      Black people have more fast-twitch muscle fibers so the jump better. White strongmen can be much stronger in “slow” strength. Blacks are singularly unable to swim for some reason. Blacks are typically inconsistent in “brainy” roles in sports like football quarterback.

      Blacks have a certain musical tradition, but I am not sure they are more creative or effective when whites (e.g. Elvis) choose to “steal” that tradition. Blacks are almost never classical musicians or composers, regarded by some as the highest expression of the art.

      Michael Jackson was an excellent dancer, and I’ve seen some excellent black break dancers on the streets in NYC, on the other hand whites dominate ballet.

      Black people are simply unwanted in east Asia. In India I am not sure but I suspect they may be regarded as low-caste.

      LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:39 pm thwack

        FamilyMan

        Black people have more fast-twitch muscle fibers so the jump better
        ————————————————————————————————

        What you need to remember about white people, particularly the white supremacists type, is the importance they place on having an explanation for something, even if its not the correct answer.

        For white people it is better to have a wrong answer as a “place holder” than to have a blank. Before white people came up with this “fast-twitch muscle” thingy, they had something else they used as the “place holder” answer. And before that, they had something else…

        you can think of these “place holder” answers like zeros . They aren’t really supposed to do anything, but by filling a knowledge hole, they reduce white people anxiety.

        The theory of evolution is an example of this “place holder” answer concept on a grand scale, as is a lot of the palentology, fossils, and other so called “discoveries” you hear about every few years; “oh look, they just discovered australopithecus Ratsafarious, a 2.2 million year old skeleton found with a light dusting of microscopic weed pollen”.

        Someone should do an experiment where a college professor teaches a class on evolution and just starts describing increasingly ridiculous “ape men” just to see how far he can take it before he gets called on it.

        BTW, the creation/evolution debates are a good source for learning how to call this white man out on his bullshit.

        Why?

        Because a white man ain’t fooled by another white man trying to pull that “place holder” answer bullshit. Kent Hovind sent so many “scientists” home crying that after a while, none would debate him.

        They would try to pull that: “and after millions of years…”

        *be advised*

        “White people have more fast-twitch ski bone ligaments so they play hockey better”

        Wow, I feel so much better about myself now.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:43 pm FamilyMan

        Are you denying that black people have more fast twitch muscle fibers, and/or that therefore they can jump higher?

        Ligaments don’t twitch. Muscle fibers twitch or contract.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 12:01 am thwack

        Not at all FM, Im just pointing out how for white people, even a wrong answer is BETTER than no answer.

        Didn’t ya’ll used to say we had an extra bone in our foot?

        and before that ya’ll had some other “answer” right?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 4:25 am Gro Haila

        Ya’ll, my housenigger?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 12:14 am FamilyMan

        Well I didn’t say those things. But to the best of my knowledge, all the answers I gave (not some other white people, or white people generally, but me) above are correct and supported by empirical evidence. Therefore, despite whatever the history may have been, I think we are at the end of history and now have real answers, real enough anyway.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 9:28 am thwack

        FamilyMan

        Therefore, despite whatever the history may have been, I think we are at the end of history and now have real answers, real enough anyway.
        —————————————————————————————————

        Im not challenging your answer FamilyMan. Im just trying to point out for the benefit of nonwhite people this white cultural artifact of the value they place on having some kind of answer, even if its incorrect, to any and all questions.

        “suffer not the knowledge hole doth the white man”

        Yesterday their answer was “they got a extra bone in their foot”

        Today their answer is “fast-twitch muscle fibers”

        and tomorrow their answer will be something else.

        It doesn’t have to be true, it just has to be THERE so the white man can look like he has the answer to everything.

        If he doesn’t, imagine what the natives will start thinking?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:04 am l82dagame

        How do you figure black people can jump higher? I mean really, other than the movie White Men Can’t Jump, do you have any documented evidence to support this besides NBA…which is not a jumping competition? In actual jumping competitions, white athletes seem to do pretty damn well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twGoVVPO08Q

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 10:03 pm FamilyMan

        Long jump is a combination of running and jumping, less pure jumping than many NBA relevant skills. And the NBA is a serious test of its relevant skills, because it pays big money to those who succeed.

        Kids who might excel at long jump may not care to go out for the track team knowing there’s hardly any reward involved. But kids (granted moreso black kids) grow up dreaming of playing in the NBA.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 10:45 pm thwack

        FamilyMan

        Kids who might excel at long jump may not care to go out for the track team knowing there’s hardly any reward involved.
        —————————————————————————————————–

        Exactly,

        and black football players who might excel at offensive line may not care to go out for the offensive line knowing there’s hardly any reward involved in the NFL.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 12:40 am l82dagame

        FamilyMan, NBA isn’t a jumping competition, and much of the jumping is a running and jumping combination. BTW, plenty of black athletes excel at long jump and high jump. The difference between NBA and international track and field competitions is that there’s an open qualifying process for international track and field. The fact that anyone thinks white athletes are slow and can’t leap well is irrelevant if they meet the qualifying place/times/distance/height. In the NBA, and most pro sports, the opportunities are limited, and nobody owes you an explanation if you don’t get in. Considering that most NBA scouts are like you, and believe that black athletes can jump better, that’s sure to lower the chances of white athletes by a significant percentage. I’m not buying that there’s a lack of black athletes competing in track and field vs. NBA due to the money. There are plenty of black athletes in many track and field events. There are very few white male athletes in the sprints; yet they hold their own in the jumping events.

        LikeLike


      • on February 8, 2014 at 11:50 pm FamilyMan

        By the way, blacks are having somewhat less problems now as NFL quarterbacks, but now they have these cool electronic armbands that allow coaches on the sideline to call plays in detail, the QB just opens the cover and reads the play to the guys in the huddle.

        You don’t see them doing much calling audibles at the line of scrimmage though. The sort of hands-on improvisation work that both Peyton Manning and Tom Brady do while calling signals I’ve never seen from a black QB.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 12:14 am thwack

        FamilyMan

        You don’t see them doing much calling audibles at the line of scrimmage though. The sort of hands-on improvisation work that both Peyton Manning and Tom Brady do while calling signals I’ve never seen from a black QB
        ———————————————————————————————-

        You mean like the sort of hands-on improvisation, no look, fast break , behind the back pass, no huddle work black basketball players do?

        wait till the black QB gets a black offensive line?

        or

        wait till the white QB gets a black offensive line?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 12:18 am FamilyMan

        Black offensive line won’t happen. Blacks aren’t strong enough. That calls for ponderous mass and driving of the feet, because you can’t even grab with the hands.

        Wait wasn’t that guy that quit the Dolphins this season over alleged racial stuff a black offensive lineman? But more than that, it seems he was a black gay offensive lineman and the taunting was really about his being gay, not black.

        Why do the best b-ball teams always have at least one slow white (or asian now for the Texans) guy on the floor? How is it even possible that a fairly clumsy guy like Larry Bird could compete at all with a smooth stallion like Magic Johnson?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 9:34 am thwack

        FamilyMan

        Black offensive line won’t happen. Blacks aren’t strong enough.
        ———————————————————————————————-

        So what do black football teams do at schools where all the students are black?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 11:30 am FamilyMan

        Was referring to NFL.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:01 pm thwack

        FamilyMan

        Was referring to NFL.
        ——————————————————————

        Where do NFL players play before they play in the NFL?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:34 pm Matthew King

        Caught in a Thwack cross-examination! Awwww shiiit. Now you done did it.

        Objection, your honor! Objection!

        (Is the judge black, like in every movie and TV show since the 1990s?)

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:42 pm Cummings-OralCummings.

        Reply to thwack:”What do black football teams do at schools where all the students are black?” Walk softly…

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 5:41 pm Glengarry

        The judge is black but NOTHING like Clarence Thomas. Just so we’re clear.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 10:05 pm FamilyMan

        Matthew please forgive me for not seeing how I was caught, in this pleasant conversation I was having with my dark brother thwack.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 11:50 am WeEvolved

        “Kent Hovind sent so many ‘scientists’ home crying that after a while, none would debate him.”

        Wrong.

        Here is a video where an Ivy League researcher refutes Kent Hovind’s creationist shenanigans: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjFeVwuJB7I

        The same vlogger has made 40 similar videos pointing out the scientific ignorance of evolution deniers, several of which feature Kent Hovind.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:09 pm thwack

        WeEvolved

        Wrong.

        Here is a video where an Ivy League researcher refutes Kent Hovind’s creationist shenanigans:
        ——————————————————————————————————

        But you forget that Kent Hovind is a white man, so he can “move like they do”

        His “place holder” answer, is just as valid as the white scientists “place holder” answer.

        Why?

        Because they are both white men; game recognize game ni66a.

        It wasn’t Kent Hovind saying black people have an extra bone in their foot.

        What country you from?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:29 pm irishsavant

        Far from fearing evidence that blacks are ‘equal’ to whites, most whites actually are terrified of evidence to the contrary. I was laying out the facts in the course of a quiet friendly discussion with my son’s former teacher when she burst into tears! There had been no hostility whatsoever. Her reaction stemmed from the agonies of cognitive dissonance.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 7:22 pm thwack

        irishsavant

        Far from fearing evidence that blacks are ‘equal’ to whites, most whites actually are terrified of evidence to the contrary.
        ————————————————————————————————–

        Terrified?

        Why would a superior person be “terrified” to find out they are superior?

        Maybe she knows its not true.

        what color was she?

        LikeLike


    • on February 8, 2014 at 11:51 pm thwack

      Customer Service

      White people can only notice biological race differences if they’re positive.
      —————————————————————————————————

      No, no, no,

      the way it works is, white people can only detect pathologies when they see them or project them onto nonwhite people.

      People see their flaws in the other.

      or the opposite,
      once you recognize a behavior in yourself, nobody else who practices it can hide it from you.

      Forever.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 4:31 am quasi

        He’s talking about what is permissable (in polite, mainstream society) for White people to notice, as far as racial differences are concerned, as dictated by The Cathedral, you imbecile.

        Whites may be permitted to talk about blacks, as a group, so long as it’s to put teh negro on a pedestal (and even then that’s no protection against charges of raycism).

        In much the same way that teh wymmins are always blathering about how they’re more ’emotionally intelligent’, or better at ‘multi-tasking’ or whatever, but a man is a disgusting, misogynist rape-apologist if he points out that maybe men are better at, say, spatial reasoning, or anything at all, really.

        In short, it’s about the cultural agenda to debase and degrade the White man – and elevate women and blacks – not about the actual characteristics, real or imagined, of Whites, idiot.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 9:39 am thwack

        quasi

        He’s talking about what is permissable (in polite, mainstream society) for White people to notice,
        ————————————————————————————————–

        Are you saying you got a little joo that walks around behind you making sure you don’t notice certain things?

        I notice whatever I want, and Im not even a white person.

        Are you ALLOWED to notice hot women?

        What country you from?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:43 pm cortesar

        I think he speaks about mind conditioning
        In Storytelling there is a scene when a young white girl after having been almost raped by her black prof goes to bathroom and repeats
        Do not be a racist, do not be a racists ….

        So joos/leftoids are not yet at stage of being capable to deprive of your faculty of noticing but they work mightily on it
        Needless to say the more they suppress it, the more violent it will when it bursts out
        They should know better for all supposed IQ they posses
        Nobody has (for)ever or will destroy (ed) the faculty on which the very survival is based
        To discern and discriminate is fundamental to a functioning brain and it will remain so simply because it is not cultural and as such subject to change but biological and therefore resistant to Super Bowl commercials

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:03 pm thwack

        cortesar

        I think he speaks about mind conditioning
        ————————————————————–

        You mean like this?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:22 pm cortesar

        Precisely
        I am feeling a crushing guilt and I am ready to confess
        the crime 500 years and thousand miles away from my insignificant existence

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:36 pm thwack

        But why?

        You already said black people are subhuman so where does this crushing guilt come from?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 3:07 pm cortesar

        That last post is becoming to the lowest of libtards
        I think you can do better than that
        But till than, buy

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 10:10 pm FamilyMan

        “Nobody has (for)ever or will destroy (ed) the faculty on which the very survival is based.”

        How do you know. Those who failed to survive are no longer here to contradict such a statement.

        Backlash is fairly difficult to do, I prefer constructive measures. Make white babies. Lots of them.

        LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 6:54 am The Burninator

      “better in basketball, musical, good dancers.”

      Well, basketball anyway.

      Or are you comparing idiot rap to Mozart? Random easily imitatible gyrations to ballet?

      LikeLike


  32. on February 8, 2014 at 11:21 pm tang3zang

    >logical assumption that as marriages improve by becoming more equal,
    >logical

    Oh, the things that passes for logic among leftoids

    LikeLike


  33. on February 8, 2014 at 11:42 pm ACG1

    Well it’s only a matter if time before Jizzabel catches wind of this, which means we’ll have the privilege (heh) of reading their ever so insightful commentary!

    OMG SHIT LIKE THIS MAKES ME SO FUCKING ANGRY! **insert appropriate .gif image**

    Can’t wait

    LikeLike


  34. on February 9, 2014 at 9:13 am Adam Lawson

    folding laundry, cooking or vacuuming

    One of these things is not like the other. Vacuuming and folding require no skill. You can be the best damn vacuumer in the world, and your floor will not be noticeably cleaner than if I went over it with a slut sucking the dirt up with a water hose.

    I imagine cooking is lumped in there because fat lazy beta guys “cook” from boxes in the freezer.

    That’s not cooking — that’s warming up. A trained, blind ape can do that.

    I cook — and it always either involves cast iron or an open flame and the outdoors. There is always prep work. There’s also always meat.

    Sharp knives, fire, the flesh of a weaker species.

    Another aspect to it — when I cook, I choose what I cook. Just like any other task, it is done to my specifications and satisfaction. I imagine most betas who warm up food other people prepared are warming up the food indicated by their unsatisfied wife.

    Don’t have an unsatisfied wife. Cook steak and eggs in the same cast iron skillet with grass-fed butter. The steak should be of a quality that the only thing you do to it is add some pepper and salt — not some grisly $3 Wal-mart glob of meat you have to soak in flavors to cover up the fact it’s going to taste like a cow’s butthole…

    If she won’t eat it ‘cos she’s a vegetarian… well, you fucked up.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 10:36 pm FamilyMan

      Expensive cuts buy you tenderness more than flavor. Filet tastes not-t00-good and bland. Chuck tastes nice if you can chew it. Sirloin tastes poor unless you dry-age it, and I do, but that took me a while to figure out how to do at home. Given the amount of meat we eat, the cost savings are significant.

      A woman would never try to dry-age her steaks herself. It’s yucky. Blood comes out. Furthermore, figuring out how to do it involves research and thinking.

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 6:01 pm Adam Lawson

        I more meant the underlying quality of the whole cow than the cut itself; there’s a place near me that sells grass fed, great tasting meat. I haven’t tried a cut of sirloin from them, but the cuts I have tried haven’t needed to be soaked in some sort of flavor before becoming edible. I literally go in, ask for what I want, the man behind the counter weighs it on a paper wrap, wraps it, I pay, go home, rub it with salt/pepper, and cook it in butter.

        Bam, great dinner.

        It’s not even much more expensive than what I could get at Wal-Mart. They’re a small “mom and pop” style store ran by a family, and I think I know where they get the beef — a local farm, also likely just ran by a family. There are some benefits to living where a lot of people work for themselves… although I could stand to be a little further away…

        LikeLike


  35. on February 9, 2014 at 12:16 pm Holden Caulfield

    Check out the math:

    500 miles of Mr. Right

    http://www.redonkulas.com/

    LikeLike


  36. on February 9, 2014 at 12:29 pm whorefinder

    There are but three truths:

    1. Blacks are subhuman.

    2. Women deserve to be smacked around.

    and 3….

    Rape!

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 1:13 pm thwack

      whorefinder

      There are but three truths:

      1. Blacks are subhuman.
      —————————————————————————————————

      Should all subhumans be hung from trees?

      or do you benefit from their existence?

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:17 pm whorefinder

        lol. It’s always so cute when the subhumans try to do human things like debate. Like when little children dress up like mommy and daddy.

        Thwackie, my un-fine negro bitch: your mother is a whore. Your father is a violent savage. And your grandmother is a wildebeest.

        Rape!

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:46 pm thwack

        whorefinder

        : your mother is a whore. Your father is a violent savage. And your grandmother is a wildebeest
        —————————————————————————————————

        OK, but on the scale of philogenetic ascension, I have at least evolved to subhuman status, so Im headed in the right direction to catch up with the white man right?

        Please say yes.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 8:39 pm whorefinder

        lol. smh. Kneegroes never do understand logic. Your entire family is subhuman, child; you’ve never evolved. You’re still the same savage monkeys the Egyptians were laughing at as they set up their empire.

        lol. Gollywog.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 10:52 pm thwack

        So where did the white man come from?

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 8:17 am thwack

        Oh Im sorry,

        did I break your concentration?

        whats the matter?

        Oh you were finished?

        well then please allow me to retort:

        Where does pale skin, blond hair and blue eyes come from?

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 8:01 pm whorefinder

        lol. Poor wittle subhuman. You will never be human, little man–you are permanently below him. And you ruin everything.

        Rape! (i.e. what all black men do to each other)!

        LikeLike


      • on February 11, 2014 at 8:29 am thwack

        You didn’t answer the question?

        If the white man is not native to anywhere, then where did he come from?

        LikeLike


      • on February 12, 2014 at 9:19 pm whorefinder

        smh. poor wittle subhuman. it’s cute how he thinks that his childish questions should be answered.

        so demanding. so stupid. so savage. so….kneegro.

        Rape!

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 1:31 pm Pluviophile

        Sir thwackalot,

        You might find an interest in this: Born in Slavery: Slave Narratives from the Federal Writers’ Project, which contains > 2,300 first-person accounts of slavery and 500 B&W photographs of former slaves.

        There’s a lot of good history in those writings. One thing I’ve noticed is most slaves’ testimonies are colored with fond remembrances of their former masters. Not all, but most.

        Now, that’s not an endorsement of slavery for the dimwitted among us, but a recognition of a reality that is in stark contrast to the guilt porn the silent majority is forced to suffer, viz., 12 Years a Slave ect.

        You’re welcome.

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:40 pm thwack

        Pluviophile

        One thing I’ve noticed is most slaves’ testimonies are colored with fond remembrances of their former masters. Not all, but most.
        ———————————————————————————————-

        What about the ones hung from trees?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:45 pm Pluviophile

        What about the ones hung from trees?

        Are you talking about Alabama wind-chimes?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 2:52 pm thwack

        No,

        these:

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 3:01 pm Pluviophile

        How many crackers you have hiddin’ in the woodpile?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 4:05 pm thwack

        Animal, saltine, graham, or Ritz?

        LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 5:17 pm Cummings,bitch. ORAL Cummings

        What about the ones boiled in oil?

        LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 8:47 pm corvinus

      Aren’t 2 and 3 facets of the same truth?

      LikeLike


  37. on February 9, 2014 at 12:32 pm Hearst

    I can watch ski jumping all day. Talk about nerves of steel.

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 1:36 pm Matthew King

      The Agony of Defeat.

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 2:06 pm thwack

      Hearst

      I can watch ski jumping all day.
      ——————————————————————————————

      Who? what? Huh?

      did I hear you say something about JUMPING?

      Hmmm… I was just discussing JUMPING with another white man, he made an interesting comment about who does the best JUMPING but I can’t remember what he said,

      hmmm….

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 8:33 pm corvinus

        We’re talking about ski-jumping. It’s a white thang.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 12:12 am FamilyMan

        Also known as ski-flying. It’s slightly about springing off the end of the ramp, but only slightly. Sorry.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 8:25 am thwack

        FamilyMan

        It’s slightly about springing off the end of the ramp, but only slightly. Sorry
        —————————————————————————————————–

        Well most world records today, when broken, are only SLIGHTLY broken ; 1/100th of a second, 1/100th of a meter…

        In addition, jumping is as much or more about coordination as it is about strength.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 1:05 am l82dagame

        You mean jumping like this?

        LikeLike


  38. on February 9, 2014 at 1:50 pm YaReally

    I don’t know why you wasted your time writing this article, CH…the hamsters have this shit covered:

    http://jezebel.com/what-if-equality-is-the-biggest-bonerkiller-of-all-1518482932

    God there’s like a year’s worth of articles in that link lol

    LikeLike


  39. on February 9, 2014 at 3:54 pm Jay in DC

    And you wonder why motherfuckers go MGTOW—

    http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/09/living/campus-sexual-violence-students-schools/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 4:47 pm Gro Haila

      I am down with not focusing on the fucking frontrunners, but man…

      Does zhyd-written “exposing (white) man privilege” propaganda sound EXACTLY like the zhyd-written “exposing the class enemy” pieces from the communist servitude. For the money they’re paying, our overlords could maybe demand their jewish propagandists shape up and come up with something slightly better?

      LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 7:02 pm FamilyMan

      Several good things about this article.

      1. Names and photos of the sex-regretters were published. Hope any future guys who consider dating them will google them and see. Perhaps they weren’t thinking straight when they agreed to this, but hey it’s their action and their fault that the author talked them into this.

      2. No names or photos or other information about the boys they accused were published.

      3. It does seem that universities are not rolling over to these charges, which is what has them so mad.

      Regarding point (1), the main beneficiary of this article is probably the author, who got paid for writing an article. The grievance industry like all others is importantly driven by money. There was a weird show on a campus, maybe last spring, where several women posted photos of their vaginas in a kiosk and the women were even on hand to discuss it. This was considered art. The women were asked why they did this for even no pay, and their answers wee so confused they were obviously talked into it by the “artist”.

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 11:11 am thwack

        The grievance industry like all others is importantly driven by money.
        ——————————————————————————————–

        really?

        that ain’t not job I ever heard of?

        You mean I could collect a check for being angry and pissed off?

        they hire black people?

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 11:20 am The Burninator

        I think he means that they make money off of people like you.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 11:37 am thwack

        How?

        ni66ers are broke like a muhfuggah

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 12:21 pm The Burninator

        I’m not going to play Internet Word Game with you thwack. The victimization industry, for any group of victims not just blacks, thrive by 1) keeping the victimization mentality alive and thriving and 2) collecting money, time and organizational response (“protest at the capitol!”) on demand. Since you intentionally prop yourself up as a wounded victim on a nearly daily basis despite having luxuries, nutrition, wealth and time the likes of which your African cousins could only dream of, you are the natural prey of those who wish to continue wearing their five thousand dollar suits and dining with the elite in the nation while pretending to be “Rev-rund” and other such nonsense.

        You know it. I know it. We all know it.

        It’s grown stale.

        LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 1:04 pm thwack

        Your verbal spanking is making me more aggrieved than I already was.

        grrrrrrr

        please stop.

        LikeLike


  40. on February 9, 2014 at 4:14 pm Anonymous

    @pluviophile
    I, for one, do not remember fondly my and my family’s slave times with the great Soiuz. Where Massa Roosevelt bequeathed us to Warlord Djugashvilli.

    @thwacko
    keep up yer black/white pseudo-dichotomous bonjangling faithful house-servant. You’re doing a great job!

    LikeLike


    • on February 9, 2014 at 6:32 pm thwack

      Anonymous

      @thwacko
      keep up yer black/white pseudo-dichotomous bonjangling faithful house-servant. You’re doing a great job
      ——————————————————————————————-

      I regret to inform you both the house and the fields are in flames.

      LikeLike


      • on February 9, 2014 at 10:03 pm Jay in DC

        “I regret to inform you both the house and the fields are in flames.”

        Goddamn right… the question is; are you gonna be Drum or Blaze?

        http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074437/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

        LikeLike


  41. on February 9, 2014 at 4:37 pm Gro Haila

    where does this crushing guilt come from?

    Houseservant Thwack

    That crushing guilt comes from the sad realization I had but one family for Massa Rossevelt to bequeath to Warlord Djugashvilli.

    You think Massa Herbert bequeathing me to Kanzler Helmut counts towards my slave duties?

    I await your answer with baited breath, as you obviously are very knowledgeable on the matter.

    LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 10:15 am thwack

      If you take the penis out of your mouth people may be able to understand what you are trying to say?

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 1:36 pm Gro Haila

        Homosexual humor, houseservant Thwack?

        Yer aping yer Massa’a choiciesyt moves.

        LikeLike


  42. on February 9, 2014 at 5:46 pm Glengarry

    So after reading that, anyone feel like having a “peer marriage”?

    LikeLike


  43. on February 9, 2014 at 6:32 pm ACG1

    http://jezebel.com/the-unwittingly-attractive-things-men-do-1505242583

    Buried in the usual Jezzie drivel is actually some useful truth congruent with the CH world view.

    I fucking LOVE watching my boyfriend cook. I can stand there and watch him all day long. He’s bustling around, chopping veggies and putting dry rub on meats and stirring things around in a pan, all confident and sure-like.

    This is clearly not about cooking in particular. Women love a guy who can show that he’s skilled, competent, and confident.

    Roll up button-ups to their elbows.

    I assume for PC purposes she excluded the caveat “as long as their forearms are muscular” in which case, they can be a good signal of strength and well-being.

    Yeeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss. I also think of this as “good watch arm.”

    The PUA community always harps on about the importance of accessories.

    Speaking passionately about pretty much anything. When my SO talks excitedly about anything he cares about, even if it isn’t really one of my interests, it is insanely attractive to me.

    This same point has actually been repeated many times here.

    And from the first comment:

    John Hutcherson, man of my dreams is a short man. […] And he doesn’t give a fuck.

    Yep. A feminist just admitted she’s attracted to guys who don’t give a fuck.

    LikeLike


  44. on February 9, 2014 at 6:46 pm FamilyMan

    Esther Perel admits the truth in the NYT article:

    In fact, she continued, “most of us get turned on at night by the very things that we’ll demonstrate against during the day.”

    LikeLike


  45. on February 9, 2014 at 9:28 pm corvinus

    Well… that was interesting. It appears that girls are very insecure about the looks of their friends. In addition, as I’ve become more alpha, I seem to be in a very clear-cut situation with Facebook where a girl will only accept a friends request if she thinks I’m attractive and she is interested.

    I’ve gotten to know a pair of roommates, a 7 and a 9, who work at the same diner. Facebooked both of them a few months ago. I’d be happy with either of them, really… my don’t-give-a-hoot attitude has become fine-tuned. (Also, the 7 has an 8 body, ha.) Now, the 7 works more at the same times I come by, and the 9 only occasionally, but the 9 comes in and hangs out once in a while when the 7 is working. I flirt with and tease both of them given the chance, but the 9 seems much more receptive, even though it’s not what I would expect, and she frequently flirts back as well. (To top it all off, there’s an 8 who also works there, who I’ve Facebooked, and who also seems very receptive to me, but she isn’t really associated with these two.)

    The 9 got a boyfriend over New Year’s, but she has rapidly seemed to tire of him since becoming official. Certainly, in his pictures he always has a gay grin, and I wasn’t even certain he was straight and not just a GBF until she started a relationship with him. Meanwhile, the 7 appears to have cooled off.

    Anyway, I hung out with the 9 last evening, and had a great time. (There was also a chubby 6 working there at the time, who actually got picked up by a hilarious fast-talking guy who could be a pretty good used car salesman, and taken out of the scene.)

    Lo and behold, the next day, the 7 unfriends me on Facebook.

    LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 12:10 am FamilyMan

      Jealousy? Go cold and let 7’s hamster spin, don’t spin your own. Maybe 9 told her about what a great time she had with you.

      I guess, act like nothing happened next time you see 7 at the diner, friendly just like always.

      No idea on whether or how to move on 9.

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 7:22 am corvinus

        It’s not the first time this has happened, either. Another case last year involved a 7 and an 8 who were roomies. Once I even saw the 7 out of the corner of my eye texting some friend, talking about how cute I was, but fretting about her 8 roomie and how “seductive” she was, and her friend was chiding her for being pessimistic. (This 8, incidentally, is too weird in other ways for me to consider a serious prospect. Her pixie cut doesn’t help either… she would be a 9 with long hair.)

        LikeLike


  46. on February 10, 2014 at 12:05 am FamilyMan

    My wife understands that women don’t improve with age. We’re watching the second olympic skating performance of 15 year old Yulya Lipnitskaya. I say “next olympics she’ll be 19, imagine how good she’ll be then.” Wife says “maybe worse.”

    Women have a more objective, less hopeful view of other women.

    LikeLike


  47. on February 10, 2014 at 12:34 am Anonymous

    Speaking of your older posts, this is “Hamster of the Month” material:

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/relationships/man-woman/Reasons-why-women-seek-extramarital-affairs/articleshow/26913721.cms?intenttarget=no

    LikeLike


  48. on February 10, 2014 at 3:52 am slicerz

    The Overlord’s CH favourite themes at once -TEXTING – FUCKED UP MODERN WESTERN WOMAN-APLHAASSHOLE in one pic http://hugelol.com/lol/242219

    LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 10:42 am Edward Waverley

      LOL, I had never seen this before:

      LikeLike


  49. on February 10, 2014 at 7:43 am APL

    slicerz: “TEXTING – FUCKED UP MODERN WESTERN WOMAN”

    The dieing alone seems to be a comon theme. Maybe it’s projection.

    LikeLike


  50. on February 10, 2014 at 9:10 am Grim

    lozlzozlzozozl. CH this is a perfect encapsulation of an American HB8. lzozlzozl

    I don’t care if she got robbed on the score — totally bitchy shit testing reaction the same as your snarl face post in clubs….. and potty mouth on national TV.

    I don’t care if she’s an Olympian. Perfect example of an americunt

    http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/09/worldsport/gallery/ashley-wagner/index.html?hpt=hp_c3

    zlozlzozlzozlzozzl

    LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 9:52 am Grim

      Women are very adept at communicating what’s in their pretty little heads with their eyebrows and forehead wrinkles, no?

      LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 10:41 am Grim

      Gracie Gold is a 10

      http://www.zimbio.com/Sexiest+Winter+Olympians?utm_source=outb&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Z-Olympics-1

      LikeLike


  51. on February 10, 2014 at 9:34 am Edward Waverley

    Check Steve Sailer’s outstanding comments on hypergamy and the Wall:

    “[T]he older she gets the sexier she ain’t.

    A huge fraction of modern marketing is aimed at convincing women that they can get sexier in the future. All I Have to Do is buy the right makeup, lose the baby weight, get a new wardrobe, get a gym membership, eat at the right restaurants, and I’ll be sexier than I am now. Would Oprah lie to me? So why should I throw away my sexytabulous future and settle for some guy who likes me now? You see, I need to lose a few pounds. Sure, I’ll have a baby with him now, but then I’ll lose all the baby weight and have a giant wedding. With him or maybe with somebody better. But exactly who is going to be the groom is not the point. The point is I’m going to have a giant wedding and be the star, so I can’t have a crummy wedding now just because I’m kind of in the mood to have a baby. I can make a baby for free, but weddings cost money. So, if my mom wins the Lotto, or if my dad ever turns up, then somebody will pay for my amazing wedding (but not until after I lose the baby weight).”

    http://isteve.blogspot.com/2014/02/marriage-promotion-is-destructive-cargo.html

    LikeLike


  52. on February 10, 2014 at 10:59 am Rollo Tomassi

    Guys got more sex from washing dishes and folding laundry, before they didn’t:

    http://therationalmale.com/2013/01/30/choreplay/

    LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 11:04 am Trance Syndicate

      Mean sex hombres like me do anyway…

      LikeLike


  53. on February 10, 2014 at 11:02 am Trance Syndicate

    Only a very small few will change their behaviour after they read it. I’ve tried to change a few beta minds and have found this liberal PC betatude is a sort of religion with most of them. Others are too afraid and lack the balls to change their ways. They choose their weakling lifestyle for a reason. They get what they deserve, in other words.

    LikeLike


  54. on February 10, 2014 at 12:21 pm Reader

    Advice from commenters:

    I’ve been seeing a submissive woman for a year. She’s a solid seven, and while I’d like a dime, she generally has a good attitude (usually accepts me treating her like shit), likes sports, and does a lot of chores for me (often more than five hours a week).

    A little more than a week ago I grew irritated with her. I felt like she wasn’t going out of her way to please me and do chores for me, like they really were chores to her. I felt like she should who the initiative to do things for me without being told. So, I cut communication for a week. When I cut communication, she doesn’t usually contact me, assuming I want my space.

    I went away on a spur of the moment vacation five days after having not communicated with her. I sent a text to a friend of hers who I’d like to hit at some point, letting her know I was in an exotic place. Then the texts from the girl I was seeing began. Tons of them, apologizing, professing her love, etc. I barely responded, just saying “hi,” “be back in five days,” not answering any questions about why I din’t tell her I was leaving.

    So, that night she sends me a photo. I assume it’s a naked pic. Later, I open it and find it’s some dumb shit. So, I text her “Do I have to cut communication with you for another week?” I get no response and text her “Apparently” a half hour later. I was using the statement as a joke, which I’d explain was because I didn’t get the naked pic, etc, and she needs to focus on pleasing me more. It’s been a few days. She still hasn’t communicated with me.

    My next move is to gather her items, throw them in a box, leave them outside her place, and message her, “Your stuff’s outside.”

    Proper move, folks?

    She’s in love with me and benefits me, but I’m not gonna listen to her cry for two hours. I’m not going to have some talk she’ll want to have. I’d rather just kick her to the curb than put up with that shit.

    LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 12:50 pm Grim

      You are a piece of garbage.

      LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 12:51 pm Scray

      Why are you nexting this girl…again?
      As far as I know, you’re supposed to cut contact and do that shit when she actively misbehaves and won’t talk to you like a normal person.

      Apparently, in this case, she uh ‘wasn’t going out of her way to please’ you and do chores for you, ‘like they really were chores to her.’ lol ok?

      Anyway, whatever that’s your prerogative….

      Proper move for what? Getting her to communicate with you? Maybe. If she’s still in love with you then ya. Altho, if she’s not communicating with you at all that’s weird.

      I don’t understand why you didn’t just tell her this shit….

      LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 1:06 pm Amy

      Maybe she’s tired of you treating her like shit. If she’s like me, the silence means she’s punishing you or is just done with you. Might as well put her stuff outside and call it a day. But, if my experience is any guide, what you’ll actually do is realize you’ve gone too far, and start contacting her to get her back.

      I think this guy’s a troll but if not, it’s a good example of how pure unadulterated constant assholery in a relationship doesn’t work (assuming you want to keep the girl). At some point a quality girl with decent self esteem gets tired of the pain and walks.

      LikeLike


      • on February 10, 2014 at 3:40 pm Grim

        As usual, Amy and I share a brain. ❤

        LikeLike


  55. on February 10, 2014 at 5:52 pm Gordon

    Can anyone point me to studies proving biological race differences? I’ve been looking for good sources but can’t find any.

    LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 8:36 pm Anonymous

      https://www.google.com/search?q=site:stormchan.org+racial+pdf

      LikeLike


    • on February 10, 2014 at 8:38 pm Anonymous

      LikeLike


    • on February 11, 2014 at 8:38 am thwack

      Gordon

      Can anyone point me to studies proving biological race differences? I’ve been looking for good sources but can’t find any.
      ————————————————————————————-

      What do you want them for?

      LikeLike


    • on February 11, 2014 at 6:58 pm DebunkingSpeciesists

      LikeLike


  56. on February 15, 2014 at 5:08 am Dalrock’s inherent unmanliness and unBiblical, frankfarter tendencies playing gamey word games while exiling Jesus and disrespecting the Word, Words Man, and God. | Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM(TM) GB4M(TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN(TM) GREATBOOKS4M

    […] CGS writes: […]

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 6:02 am Kate

      “A true Christian woman does not need to be gamed.”

      FINALLY! FINALLY! If you’re putting this on a t-shirt, I want to wear it for my next gravatar.

      LikeLike


  57. on February 15, 2014 at 5:12 am Dalrock–Destroyer of Words, the Word, and Men’s Souls: Dalrock’s inherent unmanliness and unBiblical, frankfarter tendencies playing gamey word games while exiling Jesus and disrespecting the Word, Words Man, and God. | Great Books For M

    […] CGS writes: […]

    LikeLike


  58. on February 15, 2014 at 5:14 am Dalrock–Destroyer of Words, the Word, and Men’s Souls: Dalrock’s inherent unmanliness and unBiblical, frankfarter tendencies playing gamey word games while exiling Jesus and disrespecting the Word, Words, Man, and God. | Great Books For

    […] CGS writes: […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Amon Ra on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Ron on Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat C…
    Gershom on The Confound Of Silence
    Mabui on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    cortesar on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • "Conspiracy Theory" Conspiracy
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Manifest Depravity
    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: