• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« He Who Loves Least Loves Most… ps and science!
Comment Of The Week: Romancing The Load »

Reader Mailbag: Valentino’s Day

February 14, 2014 by CH

Email #1

A reader of the estrogenic persuasion writes,

I am a new mother of a two month old infant boy.

Generally it’s ill advised to seek parenting advise from a non-parent, but you have convinced me of so many truths that I am asking.  I am asking you for parenting advise.  Not of the “how to get baby to sleep thru the night” kind or “how to accomplish potty training,” but rather, what do I do with this child?  Do I hand him a skateboard and tell him to enjoy the decline?  Do I start an educational savings plan and hope that the 1950’s comes back?  How and when do I begin his “game” education?  Is it a mistake to bring children into this world?  I figure people had children during declines before, and ultimately the world will abide.

My husband and I are both white.  We are not religious.  He is an engineer and we met at university.  I would describe him as a classic beta provider.  I stumbled on your website several years ago before we were engaged, and I subtly gave my husband a “red-pill” education, to the point where his “game” is at a point where he is reasonably attractive.  I have also upped my “game” so to speak, and I’m no 10 but I’m enough for this guy and he gets all his lunches packed for him and never has to do laundry or sweep the floor.  I also felt like if something happened to me, my husband would never be able to meet another woman, but now I feel confident that he has enough game that he wouldn’t be eternally celibate if I died and I am comforted by this.  I also feel that the game I taught him will help him in his professional life.

Discovering your website turned my world upside-down.  In addition, my son’s formerly conservative, suburbanite, rather dull grandparents are now radical anarchist activists.  Needless to say, within the past 5 years or so, I have questioned everything I thought I knew.  Your last DIVCON post prompted me to write you.

Considering my situation, do you have any parenting advise for me?

Re-read that CH-bolded part. Doesn’t that confessional blip get right to the heart of marriage and its lurking discontents? If a woman knows you can get other women (should the need arise), she is happier. Game can strengthen marriages.

If field experience in the dating trenches and genetic analyses are any indication, the world is changing faster now than it ever has before. The human landscape is shifting under our feet. New parents are right to be concerned how to raise their children, especially their little boys for whom the armaments of the leftoid cultural propaganda and policy machines have taken aim.

My advice will be long and bitter.

1. Boys don’t need to hear about decline. What they need to hear about are enemies to fight.
2. You must raise your boy with an eye on his future prize: love and loyalty from beautiful women. This means cultivating in him an appreciation of sex differences and a focus on exploiting his native talents. Admiration from men will follow.
3. His father will be tempted to correct his weaknesses. This is misplaced help. Dad should direct his energy to maximizing his son’s strengths.
4. Give your son room to grow into a man. Let him take risks and flirt with danger.
5. Your son will learn how to successfully deal with women by observing his father deal with his mother. The best thing Dad can do for his son is game his Mom.
6. When your son is a teenager, introduce him to weightlifting and men’s fashion.
7. Your son will not want to “share his feelings” with you or Dad. If you want to know what’s on his mind, tell a story lesson from your life. He will subconsciously ingest your story and relate it to his own problems.
8. Do whatever you can to assure your son attends majority (80%+) white schools. Your son’s life of learning is not a safari.
9. Mock feminism and equalism at the dinner table. By age 8, your son should be ready for irritating truths. By age 15, for the ugliest truths.
10. Your son isn’t a programmable entity or a projection of your need for usefulness. Don’t schedule his life by Google calendar. If you’re shuttling him to events or clubs more than twice a week, cut back. He needs those days where he explores on his own and returns home caked in dirt.
11. Encourage his boyness. Buy him construction sets, toy guns, model planes, sports equipment, natural science books, and, when he’s older, the CH bestseller.
12. Never humiliate his father in front of him. You may find it satisfying, but you’re doing your boy a disservice.
13. Teach him to throw a punch, and take a punch. If Dad can’t do it, find a male relative who can.
14. Buy him an electric guitar for his eighth birthday. He may not have musical ability, but it’s worth finding out.
15. Teach him to hunt, not just animals, but also humans. This is the darkest of my advice, but it’s invaluable. He should know what it feels like to be aggressive, to initiate conflict. Not necessarily physical conflict; verbal conflict mastery is more useful. His confidence as a man-to-be will grow along with his facility at managing social interactions, joshing with other boys, and teasing rivals.
16. Avoid criticism in favor of demonstration. When he makes a mistake, the urge to criticize will be strong. Better to channel that emotion into helpful suggestions. Preserve your boy’s honor and he’ll reward you with redoubled efforts to please you.
17. Keep a close eye on your son’s school curriculum. Don’t be afraid to confront school administrators and teachers if they start stuffing absurd shitlibbery into his impressionable mind.
18. If you are atheist or agnostic, swallow your pride and ensconce him in a religious tradition. The presence of a powerful overseer, true or not, will help ground him and gird his will. This is a tough call, though, because most Western religions have become utterly corrupted by malign anti-white influences. Nevertheless, if there’s one pretty lie that you should abide for a short while to facilitate his healthy emotional development and a sense of protective community, this is it.
19. If you have the means, travel with him to Europe to experience the great traditions and accomplishments of his ancestors. Cheaper version: the public library.
20. No social media. No iPads. No iPhones. Boys don’t become great men with their eyes glued to a screen like a plugged in Matrix pod. They become great men with their eyes up and searching the horizon.

***

Email #2

A reader wants to know how his text game ranks,

Hey, I just wanted to see if you had time to critique my text game with this girl I’ve known for 6 years. She likes me but I don’t pursue friends. I talk to her all the time and use her to test out some theories that I read up on here and elsewhere.

Up until recently I didn’t even know text game was a thing. I didn’t use the 1/3 rule, there were times where I replied instantly after it took her a few minutes to respond, and I also replied with more words than she did but I think it turned out well.

The reader is blue, the girl white.

The reader broke a couple of texting rules, but it didn’t hurt him because he has the right attitude (cocky teasing) and he initiated the conversation. If you initiate with a girl, you will, by the nature of the tacit disequilibrium in relative value, have to expend more effort in moving the girl toward a flirty rapport.

This girl is sassy, so the risk here is that this type of edgy parrying isn’t going to move her closer to sexual interest. She likes it, but there has to be a push so she feels like the drug is being taken away from her. The reader might try texting back that he’ll catch up with her tomorrow “with juicy details if things go right tonight”. When she inquires, don’t respond. The exquisite pang of incipient jealousy must be allowed to slow boil her hamster through the night.

***

Email #3

A pressing matter,

Hey, Heartiste, why do chicks “lol” so much in txt convos? It’s almost perfunctory with them; they can’t possibly laugh that much. What are they trying to say? Do they even know?

It’s social lubrication. Girls use nonverbal and verbal tics like “lol” to create and amplify bonding. It’s like how you might laugh a little extra hard at your boss’s jokes. When a girl does this excessively, a good neg you can use is “hey you laugh a lot”, as if you’re making some sort of astounding, but value-neutral, discovery. Simple, but oh so effective.

***

Email #4

A reader speaks for millions,

I write to the great Chateau with a burning question that has plagued me for months.

When are you going to compile the best writings of CH into a game bible? If you published a book it would easily be the greatest thing to come out of the manosphere. It would rival Rollo’s book (see that tight neg, you’ve taught me well).

Even if you don’t have the time make a book could you at least compile a best of? This is easily my favorite blog. Quality writing and raw, biting truths. Anyway, enough dickriding. I eagerly await your response.

Sincerely
A young reader.

Your flattery game is tight, young padawan. But the Chateau staff of life is vainglorious, and can accommodate that mistress factory known colloquially as Russia riding it to completion.

***

Email #5

Wherefore amused mastery?

Long Story Short (hopefully)!

Dating 8 yrs. Own a condo together for 1.5 years.

Just read your “I Love You Too” article. The beta schmuck comment at the end about saying “luvya” at the end of each call really resonated with me. I knew I was beta with my girl but this really sunk to how bad it really is. I’ve been doing some reading cause I feel like she just isn’t in to me like before, and I’d love that to change.

I have zero game, if I like a girl: beta mode! at least that’s all I knew when I was single. Although luckily enough for me due to the fact (when we met at 16) she was one year older and I assumed out of my league. I thought I didn’t have a chance. So no loser beta attempts at getting her (wish I knew this before lol). Apparently I’m cocky funny as a normal human, she always recounts when we first met how much of a dick I was, I used to give her the hardest time, cause it was fun. Then I asked her out and beta schmuckery ensued for the last 8 years. Although a couple of questionable acts on my part have basically made me more beta to try and make up for hurting her and calming her jealousy down. So I find it quite hard to be funny or whatever when she get’s in a jealous spell, I’m usually apologetic etc. In general though how can this be pulled back around.

I think also a good thing to cover is guys in LTR for a LOOONG time, like me 8 years, that discover proper game etc, how can we change the dynamic, it’s not an easy thing to mentally get around. Changing how we act etc.

Thanks for all the great articles it’s really interesting reads and helpful.

How many times have we the assembled heard this sap story before? The congenital beta who’s as cool as a cucumber with girls when the pressure’s off, but becomes a try-hard troubadour as soon as the prospect of s-s-s-sexual intimacy or, worse, relationship finality, looms. It’s a script that men appear bedeviled to play until someone smacks them straight.

Just keep this handy maxim in mind:

CH Maxim #57: Beta males mate guard, alpha males disregard.

There will be exceptions to this, but as a guiding life principle, you’ll go more right than wrong following it. When your girlfriend gets jealous, don’t appease. Do that and you may as well count the days till she blitzkriegs your balls. Instead, playfully acknowledge her jealousy in a way that implicitly alleviates her worst fears. For instance, “Keep it coming, Your jealousy is giving me a chub. *make stupid exaggerated expression of joy so she knows you’re mocking her* You like me! I’m fuckin tickled pink.”

The thing to understand about very long-term relationship game is that your worst enemy is familiarity fatigue. The both of you will fall into predictable routines, because humans are path of least resistance maximizers. If you want the LTR bad enough, you’ll have to do things that shake up the ordinary that she’s become accustomed to. That could mean a lot of things (CH favors fast getaways), or it could mean having children (CH again favors fast getaways), as long as whatever you do isn’t something she could see coming. Also, peer into the CH archives for “relationship game”. Lots of pertinent stuff by men who have been down the road you’re on.

***

Email #6

Just how universal is game?, asks a reader.

Hi Heartiste,

do you think game is completely universal, or is it somewhat race-dependent? Is the optimal alphaness different if you want to maximise your chances to bang a white/black/asian girl?

Personally I guess it is race dependent, and is nicely symmetrical to the r-K human spectrum:
black->max alpha asshole game
white->more subtle alpha, intermediate
asian->beta may do it, it’s more important to play your provider card…

It’s a false dichotomy to presume game must be either universalist or particularist. There are general game principles that are universal (e.g., confidence, teasing, charm, and power are attractive to all women) and there are game tactics that will differ depending on the race of the woman, the race of the man, or the cultural context within which each resides (e.g., the effective ratio of beta provider game to alpha ambivalence game).

No doubt the races of women differ in some respects regarding their receptivity to American style game, but these differences can be accommodated without chucking the entire game framework. Your spectrum is a good start, but I’d warn against overplaying the amount of stone cold alpha that black women love or the amount of courtly beta provider game that asian women love. I’ll give you two quick stories from my life to illustrate what I mean.

One black girl I dated certainly loved my disappearing act and my cocksureness. But when she saw me out once with a blonde on a lunch date, her crestfallen face told me everything I needed to know about her feelings. The ultimate “aloof alpha” card had been played, and it drove her into a depressed tailspin, where some simple gestures of beta commitment on my part would have brought her back into my arms, if I had desired that.

One other time I was set up on a date with a tall, elegant asian woman by a friend. We went carousing downtown together, but the sexual energy never seemed to spark. A few days later, my friend accosted me and asked me what happened. I said that I tried, but she just wasn’t giving any signals that she wanted more. I chalked it up to her asianness and her need to take it especially slow. He replied, “She wanted it, but you weren’t pushing for it. She said you never made a move.” I considered that, and realized I may have poisoned my own game by making assumptions based on her race about the level of alphatude she would welcome.

The lesson should be clear, but this isn’t meant as a contradiction of the existence of racial differences in female attraction triggers. Yes, if you date black (more precisely, *culturally* American black) women, you’ll need more up-front, loud, borderline obnoxious, socially dominating game. If you date asian women, you’ll want a lower intensity game, one which requires perhaps a few more intimations of your relationship-mindedness and romanticism.

Then there are the complications that arise from unspoken friction created by interracial game. An asian man will have to compensate for his assumed betatude by being more alpha with white and black women than would white or black men with those women. A black man will have to tone it down with white and asian women, and “act white” to allay (mostly justifiable) fears that he’s too aggressive or socially low value.

You might say the sweet spot is to be a white man, and on that point I won’t argue.

This Valentino’s Day, let us give tribute to the great white, and quasi-white, master romancers of European history. They have taken the rhythms of the mating jungle and elevated it to symphonies of seduction.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Maxims, Reader Mailbag | 340 Comments

340 Responses

  1. on February 14, 2014 at 3:07 pm Zombie Shane

    That chick in #1 who cares so much about her man that she TAUGHT him game?

    And now she feels safe in knowing that if she gets all Susan-G-Komen-y and departs this earth in an untimely manner, then her man has the mad skillz necessary to NOT be all totally lonely and miserable and desperate without her?

    Jesus H Christ, is she a keeper!!!

    It’s what I keep telling you dudes – deep six the bitches with The Darkness in their hearts and ruthlessly pursue the nice girls from the good families.

    Former-Beta-engineering dude needs to get down on his knees every night and pray prayers of thanks [and sing exultations of Gloria] to The Creator of All Things for allowing that chick to cross paths with him and to join him in the living of his life.

    Much less to merge with her and to have the product of her womb be entered into The Tree of Life Itself.

    Shit. Damn.

    Chicks like that simply do NOT walk into your life every day.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 3:30 pm Tilikum

      Wow. You have gone hard over.

      LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 3:38 pm burke

      I didn’t know whether to believe it or not. I have a hard time she could ‘teach’ a guy something and then, knowing she taught him, find it attractive in him. Seems like it would diminish her already limited respect for him even further.

      #21 advice for raising any son, though, I think: he needs to be raised in the household with his father.

      LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 4:41 pm Zombie Shane

        > “I didn’t know whether to believe it or not.”

        Yeah, I wondered if it was fake – if it was some manboob living in his Mom’s basement, pretended to be some dude’s wife – and it certainly could be a fake.

        But the general gist of It rings true to me.

        Particularly the fear which she feels for her son, and this utter collapse of Western Civilization which awaits the boy as he grows older.

        BTW, if you’re on the East Coast – in the Southeast or the Mid-Atlantic – and you witnessed the paralysis which this most recent snowstorm caused, and the utter cluelessness and helplessness of huge swaths of our population in the face of it: HOLY COW if that wasn’t a wakeup call to start Prepping for the End Times, then I don’t know what would be.

        We are very nearly at the point where 50% + 1 of the warm bodies in this nation are utterly incapable of even imagining what it would be like to take some initiative in their lives, much less to achieve anything even remotely resembling self-sufficiency.

        Also, I very much like Heartiste’s #1: “Boys don’t need to hear about decline. What they need to hear about are enemies to fight.”

        The time is drawing near – very quickly, maybe even acceleratingly quickly – when we simply cannot continue to play by the tradition of what you might call “the Marquess of Queensbury rules”, which tradition has been the hallmark of our people since time immemorial.

        It is getting very close to the onset of The Dark Times, when we will simply have to take off the gloves, and start getting serious about our own survival.

        And God have mercy on us when that happens.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 7:52 pm little spoon

        “Seems like it would diminish her already limited respect for him even further.”

        My thoughts exactly.

        This situation is just sad and pathetic. She married some beta who didn’t seem to have enough of his own instinct to be the man she wanted him to be, so she sought out CH so she could live in some red pill fantasy world. That part isn’t so bad. It’s a bit sad already as she settled for a beta and then tried to get him to mold himself into some other man’s red pill vision, but hey, we could all use some self improvement advice.

        But this asking CH for how to raise your child advice is a step too far in nursing a sense of her husband’s inadequacy. Hey lady, maybe you should reconsider whose child it was you actually wanted. FYI, your kid already has a father. Maybe you should try asking him how he wants his kid raised. Maybe you should have married someone who you trusted to be a father and make decisions so you didn’t have to go badger CH for a framework on how to raise your child. It’s one thing to ask someone about how to get your kid to eat veggies, but quite another to ask a dude for an intellectual framework for child rearing. Because that’s what the father is for.

        [CH: The advice given is useful for all fathers.]

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 1:42 am FamilyMan

        spoonie, as a father, I can tell you I take advice from all over, intended and unintended, and filter it. I don’t have all the answers and at least one of CH’s points resonated with me as something I should improve.

        I think most intelligent men would see it about as I do. I don’t know any men I’d trust who don’t think that advice can be useful.

        I am interested in your reaction though, because it’s strange. You are telling this woman to break up the family because the guy isn’t beta enough for her. This is a woman you don’t know and her husband is the father of their child. And yet, you think this woman’s gina tingles are more important than having the father around. Even when a woman wants to do it right, you want her to go for the gina tingles.

        Here, let me say this to you. Fuck off.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:49 am Kate

        She never said the writer should break up her family. She’s just reminding the woman that she should be having this conversation with her husband. I agree with her on that. But the topic is a good one in general as not everyone has a red pill partner to help them in doling out the red m&m.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 8:04 am little spoon

        “I think most intelligent men would see it about as I do. I don’t know any men I’d trust who don’t think that advice can be useful.”

        I’m sure you are correct. No sane man would take this post as gospel, but this child raising post was not sought out by a sane man. It was sought out by a woman who wanted to find a gospel she’d want to live by.

        “I am interested in your reaction though, because it’s strange. You are telling this woman to break up the family because the guy isn’t beta enough for her. ”

        lol, WUT? 1) The kid is 2 months old. She could have (and maybe should have) left earlier. Now that the kid is there, I don’t think she should leave. I think she should have never written this question to CH though in such a blatantly dismissive manner to her husband. Her husband can be trusted to decide when to get a skateboard, but apparently not trusted to decide much beyond that.

        I asked my boyfriend if he would ask someone for advice on child raising if we had a son, and he said no. Not surprising, as my boyfriend has 3 adult daughters. He said you act as a role model and then accept that the child is a different person and will develop based on their own natures. So, since this lady thinks it is a good idea to ask internet people who have no children about child rearing, I will give her this advice- be a role model as a mother and accept who your child is (the genetic offspring of you and your husband, not CH). Stop completely doubting your husband’s competence at decision making. You can sweep all the floor and change every diaper, but you’ll never be a good role model for your son if continue to think that you should rely on dudes who are not his father for answers to questions like “was it a mistake to bring a child into this world” and “what do I do with this child.”

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 7:43 am little spoon

        “[CH: The advice given is useful for all fathers.]”

        I’m not criticizing you for writing it, nor do I take issue with the content of your advice. It seems you wanted to express ideas about how a boy should be raised and the lady’s question was a way for you to introduce the topic.

        But the lady, from what I know of her, makes my skin crawl. To use a hyperbolic analogy, she’s like someone who wants to live in a role play fanfic world. She’s the puppet master here. She wants to be in this 1950s fantasy where she makes lunches every day. It sounds sweet, but you might as well replace this with wanting to dress up like Harry Potter characters or Vulcans. She’s the one orchestrating her husband into playing a part in her desired fantasy.

        It’s gross because it’s inauthentic. If you are aware you want a dominant guy, then why don’t find some guy who is inherently dominant or at least made dominant by his own decisions so that you can listen to him? Why on earth would you choose to stick to a docile beta that you can mold him into your fake role play fantasy idea of dominant and then lie to yourself and pretend that it’s a healthy male-female relationship?

        She discovered CH years ago and the boy is 2 months old. Has she really accepted her husband for who he is and accepted that he ain’t CH and her son is never going to be CH’s son? Seems not.

        God forbid I ever sink to the state where I have to ask someone on the internet this kind of intimate advice on major decision making about a kid-

        “I am asking you for parenting advise. Not of the “how to get baby to sleep thru the night” kind or “how to accomplish potty training,” but rather, what do I do with this child? Do I hand him a skateboard and tell him to enjoy the decline? Do I start an educational savings plan and hope that the 1950′s comes back? How and when do I begin his “game” education? Is it a mistake to bring children into this world?”

        Disgusting. WTF. His father is in the house, and she asks another man for this? Like dude who contributed 50% of the child’s genetics is right there and you ask someone you’ve never met what to do with the child?

        I don’t imagine that a normal healthy guy would have asked CH “how do I raise my son? what on earth should I do?” If anything, I think a normal healthy man might have asked the question generically. Like, CH, how do you think a son should be raised. And then, he would have taken or left what he thought was appropriate. But it’s a bit sick for a mother to pose such a major question so deferentially to CH about stuff her own husband should obviously be deciding for himself based on whatever influences he chooses to seek out.

        But hey, now she has an answer. Now she can tell her husband and his family and they can continue to play the roles they are supposed to in her puppet world, and that will be the “red pill” life in her mind.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:43 am Anon

        LS: your hamster has rabies. Please see a vet.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 7:49 am Lara

        New mothers tend to think about these things a lot, and she obviously values CH’s opinion. I think you are trying to make it into something it isn’t.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:21 pm BlackPoisonSoul

        Living proof that women get all bent out of shape when other women say that they are happy with their man. The reflex to tear things down is strong within them – thus the chorus of biddies these days engaging in their circle-jerk screaming of: “Frivorce him! Frivorce him!”

        Such music to our ears. Gentlemen, you have just seen Hypergamy and women at its online worst. Take heed of the little spoon, who thinks that:

        1/ her opinion of another woman’s life actually matters

        2/ thinks that the other woman’s request for help should be shit upon

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 7:54 pm Mob Barley

        She sounds like a dick here no two ways about it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 8:03 pm little spoon

        “Living proof that women get all bent out of shape when other women say that they are happy with their man.”

        She didn’t say that anywhere. She said-

        “I also felt like if something happened to me, my husband would never be able to meet another woman, but now I feel confident that he has enough game that he wouldn’t be eternally celibate if I died and I am comforted by this.”

        Wow. That’s such a pitiful thing to think about a guy. She felt at any point like he would be eternally celibate? That’s so totally condescending and disdainful. You guys are totally delusional if you think this lady has any real respect for this man. She gave him game education like one would help a poor lost puppy. Sympathy for omega turned to marriage. This is not a woman who is happy with her man. Not even close.

        I don’t think she should get divorced now that she has a kid. That won’t help the situation, but this is not a situation a woman should get into to begin with.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 5:14 am BuenaVista

        I believe it (“she could ‘teach’ a guy something”). After 20 years as a greater beta provider, and the usual outcome to jumping over higher and higher hurdles each year to keep the marriage going (“here’s my lawyer’s contact info, I think a week is long enough for you to move out, don’t you?”), I sold my company and started commuting to NYC for some social action. There I met and consummated an affair with a prominent Hollywood woman I met on a hot summer day at the Boathouse bar in Central Park.

        Now, I was just a hard-working guy from the provinces who’d made some money in the software business; I’d met my ex- almost 25 years earlier, and my fumbling and stumbling dating immersion in my 40’s was slightly informed by Doc Love (“challenge, control, confidence”) but I had never heard of any of CH’s precepts, or anyone else’s. (I have been a red pill aficionado for a little over a year.) I still thought being a beta provider was the ticket, while I changed up my clothing, looked at porn for the first time (educational, for me), got a new plane, and bought a 200 year-old house and renovated it. Pretty much the whole cliched package for the newly divorced 40-something. In dating acumen, I suspect, an awful lot of 18 year-olds were older than I.

        Suddenly I’m having breakfast on Central Park West, sharing an elevator with Sting, watching movies in a home theatre with twenty seats, front row at the Garden, Page Six, etc. This was a major transition from living in the Washington suburbs and driving to work each morning at 6 a.m., spending the days with mathematicians, coming home at 8 p.m., and doing husband stuff all weekend.

        There’s no question she enjoyed the beta provider-plus-athletic-frame (I’m still at my college playing weight); her dad, whom she admired, was a traditional provider type, still married to her mom. (The girls who fall hard for me have good dads, and good relationships with them.) But it wasn’t enough. Shortly I was on thin ice. She was very good at cracking the door on the darker arts of manliness, and I wish I had been a quicker study. Though she looked like (and has been, professionally) a WASP princess, she quietly took me aside from time to time and mentioned a few things that are old hat to you guys, but were absolutely shocking to me:

        a. she liked pain in bed. “Whaaaa??!!!” I thought. I slowly caught on, until one morning she smiled and pointed to a bruise and said, “I said I liked some pain, but not quite that much.” I was horrified with myself. She shook her head and smiled again. “You’re not listening. I said I liked it, just not quite this much.” It was not uncommon for us to stay in bed until mid-afternoon.

        b. she told me to discard my status insecurities about the celebrity circles; “they wish they were you, or me with you. Get over it.”

        c. she flat admitted that she saw no reason to even attempt intellectual parity in the relationship: “you’re the intellectual here, I’m the facilitator for you.”

        d. she made a study of my large and small enthusiasms, and fed them with favors, gifts and other acknowledgements that my ex- of 20 years had ceased offering after a year or two of marriage.

        e. she slapped me figuratively when she caught me calibrating her surroundings and crowd, and adjusting my dress, commentaries and presentation to them in conformist fashion: “Why don’t you, BV, school them on BV’s style instead.”

        Anyway, a seminal relationship for me, one I’m still studying in retrospect, and yes, I do believe the engineer’s wife exists. If a woman like this falls into your life, take a weekend by yourself and think hard: you’re not going to meet more than one or two in your entire existence (I’ve met one) so decide whether or not you’re going to believe your good fortune. Then don’t fuck it up by confusing being A Good Man with being good at being a man. Good Men are a dime-a-dozen; few are good at being a man, and a smart (or just an honest) woman knows that the latter are the prize.

        LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 5:25 pm FamilyMan

      Agree with the Zombie. They’re not that rare if you’re more daygame than night / text game. You meet real decent people in real life, some anyway.

      Shit could still go wrong when married with kids. But at least there’s a chance. If he works at it (quietly behind the scenes) he’ll have a family with children. Not only that, this is a woman with a brain, which means his kids will be pretty smart.

      Yes he should go for it and make babies with her.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:42 am Zombie Shane

        > “if you’re more daygame”

        Another incessant relentless theme of mine here at the Chateau.

        Get out and meet chicks in real life.

        In the real world.

        Talk to them about the reality of reality.

        Size them up.

        Smell them.

        Watch their mannerisms and their jitteriness and their quirks.

        Sense the chemistry between you.

        5 seconds of body language in the real world is worth five weeks or five months or five years of txting in the fantasy world.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 7:36 am Zombie Shane

        And glance at the God-damned bumper stickers on her car.

        If she’s got anything even remotely resembling a “Yes we can!” on the back of her car, then that’s an immediate and permanent and eternal NEXT.

        Turn around, walk away, and never look back.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orpheus#Death_of_Eurydice

        http://www.bartleby.com/108/01/19.html#26

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 5:08 pm thwack

        OR,

        you can get out and do something you like doing that also attracts chicks?

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 4:37 pm Matthew

        I hear flash mobbing is good for that.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 5:22 am thwack

        You guys are all confused about women; this ni66a will clear everything up for you and put her in context:

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 7:34 am Mob Barley

        Chicks dig knockout game.

        LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 6:12 pm Charlie Dont Surf

      I said the same thing.

      Women like #1 – cultivate a mans dignity and will always be attractive.

      That je ne sais quoin that transcends the wall.

      LikeLike


  2. on February 14, 2014 at 3:11 pm Lushfun

    I think learning failure when your a kid is invaluable.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 10:03 am thwack

      Yep, especially when you black.

      LikeLike


  3. on February 14, 2014 at 3:12 pm Heywood Jablome

    The CH Maxims deserve a dedicated page.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 4:13 pm irishsavant

      Superb advice for rearing a boy. Congratulations. Worth more than 1000 of those Cultural Marxist-based mind-fuck books that infest our environment. Come to think of it, a turd in a Punchbowl would be better than any of those pieces of garbage,

      LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 4:45 pm Charlie Dont Surf

      Where can I find this list of Maxims ?

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:28 am Pluviophile

        Check the comment section:

        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/a-beta-orbiter-gets-the-green-light/

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 8:39 am Heywood Jablome

        So far? Here.

        LikeLike


  4. on February 14, 2014 at 3:16 pm Troubadour

    Changing things up deep into a LTR can be tricky, but it works. I’m sitting here with a homemade cake, a card, and a DVD my wife bought me “for the husband I’m so lucky to have,” and she got precisely dick from me in the way of emotion. I gave her a speech about, “Instead of going through the motions of pretending I give a fuck, why don’t I let you spend $150 of your own money on whatever you want. How’s that for a deal?” She accepted, and undoubtedly spent some of the $150 on me to buy the card and the DVD.

    I used to make kissing noises and say “I love you” at least 500 times a day. Now I’m looking at having to fuck my wife as a pure cash transaction as the man whore I am. Dump a fuck into Shamu every Sunday night, keep my wood shop and all the rest of my stuff. I hate it, but it’s a practical compromise.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 3:20 pm threeLegDog

      ” Dump a fuck into Shamu every Sunday night, keep my wood shop and all the rest of my stuff. I hate it, but it’s a practical compromise.”

      O_o

      cant tell if srs…

      LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 5:05 pm corvinus

      Dump a fuck into Shamu every Sunday night

      Let the fat-shaming begin.

      LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 6:41 pm Scray

      these posts are hilarious.
      I just wish they’d be more about you leaving your fatty wife at home and just getting ass.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 7:22 am Troubadour

        Me too dude. It is what it is. I’m probably closer to getting some ass now than I was a couple months ago, because I’m almost totally over caring whether I get any ass or not. Outcome independence is becoming reality.

        I just broke up with my friend girl and resigned my position as her validation monkey. I’m going to go blog about that one here shortly.

        I came home from work and had a dozen roses and some chocolate truffles on top of all that other stuff I talked about earlier. Dread game WORKS.

        But it won’t make Shamu get on a treadmill, unfortunately.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 5:17 pm FamilyMan

        Why not suggest bariatric surgery? Seriously. Dieting doesn’t really work for most people, the setpoint is the setpoint. With surgery, at a very slight risk to her health, she might get her husband back as well as better health, a risk she might well be willing to take.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 6:48 am Troubadour

        Been down that road. They’ll do the surgery for people who need to lose hundreds of pounds to get down to a healthy weight, but not 60-70 pounds. She’s not fat enough to qualify. Diet and exercise, the docs say.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 5:19 pm driveallnight

        Put a bucket of herring in front of the treadmill. It works for SeaWorld.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:13 pm Grim

        Treadmill doesn’t build a good body. Get hey dumbbell a and make her do squats.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:14 pm Carlos Danger

        This is why prostitution needs to be legal.

        LikeLike


  5. on February 14, 2014 at 3:19 pm John

    Great parental advice. You might have made a good father.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 3:40 pm Amy

      I agree. There’s still time….

      LikeLike


  6. on February 14, 2014 at 3:29 pm Kim du Toit

    For educating a son:

    1. The Western Canon. All else follows from that.
    2. Gun handling and shooting instruction from age 7 (earlier if appropriate). If you’re a man and you can’t handle a gun with at least some competence, you ain’t worth shit. If you’re a gun-fearing wussy, then at least let the boy have a slingshot or bow.
    3. Some form of martial arts education at an early age, but don’t push him into staying with it if he’s not interested. (Ditto sports like soccer, which teach positive team participation and alpha recognition.)
    4. Buy him a knife at age 9. Pocket knife, sheath knife, whatever.
    5. Musical instrument, likewise until he gets sick of it.
    6. One of the shop trades: wood, metal, electrical, whatever. If you’re a man and you can’t work with your hands in at least one of these, you ain’t worth shit.
    7. Teach him respect for manly occupations and the men who do them: firefighters, soldiers etc.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 4:16 pm OralC

      #7:Dont forget interior designers

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 2:30 pm behindtheberezina

        I have to disagree with your #2, if you’ll indulge me. I grew up with woods and creeks to explore, which in itself is a boy-rearing device of the first order. (That should be in bold italics.) I got a BB gun, then a pellet gun, then a .22 rifle. I shot and skinned rabbits and squirrels at 9 years old. I trapped possums and coons. At age 10, I’d swim across a river in the dark of night with a flashlight and a pillow case. I blinded bullfrogs on the bank with the light, grabbed them and threw ’em in the sack. I bashed their heads on concrete, cut off their legs, and had my mom cook them for me. I gigged frogs and fish during the day. I milked water moccasins and shot copperheads for fun. I was no lefty-influenced mama’s boy, is the point. I backpacked at the Great Divide for a month when I was 20 or so. But even before that, at some point I lost interest in guns in favor of sharp steel. The Spartans refused to use the bow and arrow because to them it was womanly to fight from a distance. It may be that way with me. I always carry at least one knife and I can use it, but I really can’t call myself competent with firearms. I don’t know much about them. I kept a 12-gauge handy when I was raising children, but that was it. My son became a gun distributer (and a soldier) as soon as he was old enough, so it’s not that I have anything against teaching a son about guns–or about entrepreneurship or patriotism. Guns just aren’t my thing. If I’m “not worth shit” I’m just now finding it out, and fretting all the sleep I’m gonna lose over it. The rest of your list is right on. (As for your #5, the electric guitar and metal, when played in public with a band, I promise, is a panty-dropper, and the panties stay the same age even when you don’t.)

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:48 am The Burninator

        Understanding real life street fighting, I’d say the odds of grappling mano a mano with some mugger on the street are near zero, since most of them pack at least a zip gun and they do NOT have time to engage in casual ju jitsu. Sure, you can run your knife blade across your chest and proclaim you war to the All Father and charge him, but then you get shot and, well, turns out the Spartans were wrong all this time.

        Meet force with equal force. Teaching a young man about the use and handling and cleaning of firearms, instills in him discipline and respect. It’s the 21st century and things like swordplay have gone the way of the dodo bird.

        I respect your choice not to own firearms or that they’re not your thing, that’s fine. Implying it’s “womanly” to use the standard self defense tool of the day and age is a bit over the top though. I’m a giant of a man compared to most men on the street, tall and muscular and trained as a soldier from my time in the service, and in martial arts since I was a kid. I still nevertheless open and conceal carry sidearms because as it turns out, all of my Giant Scary European God value is worth jack shit the first time some runty 19 year old pulls a Glock on me.

        I like CH’s list, it’s basically what I’ve done with my son. He’s 17, going out with the acknowledged hottest chick in his class (according to my daughter and her friends who all “like-hate” her because she’s so pretty, plus she’s a church going girl of the old school variety that still values men). The boy bought his own shotgun at age 14 and has a Mosin Nagant 91/30 that he’s a crack shot with as well. He’s competent with a Browning Automatic Rifle even (yes!). Musically talented, mathematically gifted, athletic (lacrosse), engineering minded (logical), social in a funny/cocky kind of way, and a do’er instead of an observer. The girls can’t line up fast enough for him. What CH is suggesting works, even though he doesn’t have real life experience with child rearing, mainly because his advice is common sense AND more or less what was once considered traditional methods of raising boys to be men.

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 2:21 pm behindtheberezina

        I missed your comment until now. I wasn’t referring to the CH list, but the one above that says I’m not worth shit considering I don’t know guns. The Spartan comment was hyperbole in response to the same. I know many a badass who owns no firearms. Full disclosure: In my case, I tend to be a hothead, and on more than one occasion I think the temptation to pull a trigger would’ve got the best of me. I was relieved I could raise a boy to manhood without passing that attribute along. I have to me-proof myself.

        Congratulations on doing so well with your own son. There’s nothing like being able to take pride in a boy well-raised. Guns, women and guitars are mine’s raison d’être; knives, women and guitars are mine.

        LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 4:21 pm M

      yeah…you had me until #7

      LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 4:25 pm Kim du Toit

        Sorry, but people who risk their lives to save others have my respect. YMMV.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 5:44 pm Zombie Shane

        I thought you were a fag troll here.

        ???

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 5:51 pm Kim du Toit

        Sorry to disappoint.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 6:10 pm Zombie Shane

        But officially you’re a fag, right?

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 6:16 pm Kim du Toit

        Run along, child Shane. Or else post under your real name so we can get properly acquainted — unless, of course, YOU’RE the little fag troll.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 6:25 pm Zombie Shane

        ???

        Okay, I’m really confused here.

        Were you pretending to be a fag troll?

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 6:33 pm Kim du Toit

        “Okay, I’m really confused here.”

        I bet you say that a LOT. Now, run along while the grownups talk amongst themselves.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 6:44 pm Zombie Shane

        Okay, if you’re not the fag troll, then I apologize.

        I must have you confused with somebody else.

        Sorry.

        LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 5:45 pm FamilyMan

      With all the sanctions at school about guns and knives, I am not at all sure I agree with (2) and (4). Do you want him thrown out of school and shamed by all those women, just because they can? And believe me, these empowered school admins can.

      Instead, get him a drone. Don’t run straight against the law. Use your brain, take a detour. You can do a lot with your own, personal, totally unregulated drone, for about $1000. And this teaches real manly skills like building things, a bit of electronics, and programming. For this century, not a previous one.

      LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 5:58 pm Kim du Toit

        When all the drones have fired their missiles, some guy with a rifle will have to occupy the ground. Drones are fine in a technological society, but if the technology disappears, you’ll be left with an expensive model aeroplance.

        If civilization collapses, I would suggest that an AK-47 will be a lot more useful than a drone, and in times of personal danger, a Colt 1911 ditto. Once again, YMMV.

        As for the school sanctions against guns and knives, fuck ’em. Walk your own path and ignore the shrieks of horror coming from the womyns and girlymen. THAT would be the greatest lesson you can teach a boy.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 6:07 pm Kim du Toit

        Sorry, that’s a little too beta for me. A drone will be worth absolute zero when civilization collapses — the man with an AK-47 and a Colt 1911 will be worth a hundred times the value of a model aeroplane pilot.

        And as for the school sanctions against guns and knives: screw ’em. Walk your own path, and ignore the plaintive squeals of the womyns and girlymen. Come to think of it: THAT would be the best lesson to teach a boy.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 1:50 am FamilyMan

        You are an idiot. A tough idiot, maybe an alpha idiot, but still an idiot.

        You haven’t actually had your son in the grips of those school administrators. I have. To a child, they aren’t plaintive squeals. They aren’t even that to full grown adults. A principal is a very fucking powerful individual. Even police defer to them.

        One of my sons had his trombone stolen in elementary school. It was stolen by the band teacher, and the principal was in cahoots with him. Yes I know it sounds unbelievable, but I saw another music teacher’s stash of things that looked like school instruments and he sold them out of his garage. Anyway I reported the theft to the police, and told them the principal was suspicious in this, and they still left the investigation to the school, because they defer to the school in anything the school touches.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 1:56 am FamilyMan

        By the way, I may be the only person you ever meet in your life, online or in person, who was able to get a tenured principal fired.

        Come back with some battle wins in the school arena, and you may have something to say.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:53 am Zombie Shane

        I always figured that being an abortionist was the most evil thing you could do in life.

        Or else being an apologist and/or propagandist for the abortion industry.

        But being a band director and a principal who run a fencing operation for band instruments which they steal from the students?

        That’s gotta be down around the bottom five of the most evil things which you can possibly be in life.

        At least by Shkotzim standards.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:41 am Kim du Toit

        Familyman,
        I never had any problems with school authorities, for the simple reason that I homeschooled my three kids.from about age 12 Just before I started doing that, though, I did get my younger son’s teacher fired. Does that count?

        Anyway, I stand by my original statement. Feel free to teach your kids to build and pilot drones against imaginary enemies — hey, they’re your kids, after all. I sleep better at night knowing that my kids can protect themselves with actual guns against actual predators. (Elder son, by the way, also made TeamUSA for pistol shooting at age 22 and just missed going to the London Olympics. When he shoots, it’s not a case of “eyeball, no eyelash”; it’s “pupil, not iris.” Irony: he’s an even better shot with a rifle: MOA at 400 yards with iron sights.)

        Going Galt on the public education system is the best way a man can educate his kids. For one thing, no matter how badly you think you’re doing, you cannot possibly do worse than the public schools, for the simple reason that you love your kids more than they do, and you’ll do your best for them — which is FAR more than the schools could ever do. For another, you’ll be removing your children from the horrible “Lord of the Rings” scenario of the public school system where kids learn all about the toxic “socialization” that occurs when adolescents are left to their own devices without adult supervision.

        Yes, it’s a huge responsibility. It’s called “parenthood”, and it may not be for everyone.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 3:30 pm Baby

        I want to hear this story! It’s so difficult to get bad public school employees fired. Are you in a union state?

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 5:38 pm FamilyMan

        NY is a heavy duty union state.

        Telling the story would reveal a bit more personal info than I want to, so I’ll have to say no to that, and draw a firm line on that so that I don’t say too much accidentally. As for lessons learned, I’d say that when weird stuff starts to happen at school, do very logical factfinding including debriefing your son regularly about what actually happens, don’t tell the school you are doing this, and do not assume any level of decency in school employees. Some are great, most are OK, some are terrible. And when you’re going to lay your cards on the table, make it very dramatic and surprising in front of many people. Blast through their heirarchy, make sure other people in the district know what this guy is doing. I received divine help in my writing and presentation skills in this case.

        Working in an elementary school is an occupation for people who like kids. What do we call people who like kids too much? Well my son was never molested sexually, but on the other hand they never could have gotten away with that. They seriously might have been trying to set that up. Again, maintain open and frequent communication with your kid about what happens in school. I think that surprises them, it seems rare and is certainly something they don’t encourage.

        The band instrument things was relatively small potatoes, just an unbelievable but funny episode. Students normally left their instruments outslde the band room on days they had band practice. He came home one day reporting his spit valve was leaking in practice so he had trouble playing. I noticed that the case looked surprisingly beat up, and inside, instead of the brand new rental we had, it was old with finish flaking off and even a bent spit valve. The rental agreement required me to report theft to the police, so we went over and filled out a police report. Lo and behold, a day or two later, the original one shows up, but since we had reported a bent spit valve in the police report, the teacher had bent the spit valve on the new trombone too. When I went in to pick it up, I alluded vaguely that I knew what was up, and the teacher looked scared.

        The police reported that my son’s original instrument was found in the principal’s office. So the principal knew something about it. This wasn’t even the principal that was fired, but his replacement.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 7:45 pm Zombie Shane

        > “but since we had reported a bent spit valve in the police report, the teacher had bent the spit valve on the new trombone too”

        OMG I actually LOL’ed at that one.

        Still laughing.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 3:14 pm Greg Eliot

        but since we had reported a bent spit valve in the police report, the teacher had bent the spit valve on the new trombone too. When I went in to pick it up, I alluded vaguely that I knew what was up, and the teacher looked scared.

        I suggest having your son take up piano and let the trombone slide.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:11 pm Carlos Danger

        Control posts would also be vulnerable.

        LikeLike


  7. on February 14, 2014 at 3:30 pm burke

    “She likes it, but there has to be a push so she feels like the drug is being taken away from her.”

    Reminded me of a classic bit from The Shield from a pimp:

    “Every chick got a hole in they heart- and it’s connected to the one between they legs. I just figure out how to fill it. Then I feed it to her, and I keep feeding it to her, ’til it’s overflowin’. ‘Til she can’t live without it. Then I take it away.”

    LikeLike


  8. on February 14, 2014 at 3:49 pm tang3zang

    “In addition, my son’s formerly conservative, suburbanite, rather dull grandparents are now radical anarchist activists.”

    How the fuck did that happen?

    Simple facts boys (or everyone) should be told:

    -Life isn’t fair, nor is it supposed to be
    -People are not inherently good
    -People are not equal
    -Try to be superior, not equal
    -Being nice isn’t that important
    -Assume everyone works towards selfish ends
    -The world is not a nice place
    -Competition is a necessity, and occurs even if you don’t participate
    -Money is power

    And most importantly:

    -People who tell you otherwise are either disingenuous, intimidated, or stupid.

    LikeLike


  9. on February 14, 2014 at 3:53 pm dblockz

    diversity + proximity = CH bangs dark meat

    so you’re telling me you’re actually thwacks father

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 11:20 am Holden Caulfield

      I thought I read in the CH archives that GBFM is thwacks father…

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 3:31 pm Baby

        Yes, and Amy is his mother. An unholy union indeed…

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 3:33 pm thwack

        You got it backwards

        Darth Vader is Lukes dad.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 5:27 pm driveallnight

        “You’re a halfnig, Luke. Search your feelings. You know it to be true.”

        “NOOOOOOOO!”

        LikeLike


  10. on February 14, 2014 at 4:14 pm Huey

    Found that guys text game hilarious

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 7:09 pm Preston

      I actually thought it was too verbose. Still – all is well that ends well.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:34 am darkhorse

        Really depends on what you’re trying to accomplish. I could show you examples of text exchanges that are super verbose, stacked up against non-replies, that end up in a girl saying she’s down to be fuck buddies. It’s because we got into a serious discussion about sex and she realized we share the same value system regarding human sexuality. And this is after she’s not responding to my texts for days. We could play the who’s wittier game, but she wants to get banged out, not have her little text-a-friend that can make her giggle.

        I could also show you first reach out texts from models that are verbose as hell and end up in dates. The point of texting is that you are using an interaction to 1) affect mood and 2) indirectly advertising qualities that are attractive (less verbose could indicate self control; but more verbose gives you a chance to show your intelligence or sense of humor.) Key things to avoid in your texts: being scary, desperate, illiterate or weak.

        I personally like aloof text game as an exercise because it teaches you to control yourself and that you can adopt different styles of interaction, but in the end, it’s good to adopt a style that’s congruent with who you and helps get your penis in the vagina of the woman you like.

        LikeLike


  11. on February 14, 2014 at 4:15 pm Preston

    The day after Valentine’s day is supposedly one rife with infidelity. I intend to follow a lead at my work. I have been the ‘other man’ only once before and it was back in college where that type of behavior would inspire slightly less ire – at least of the deadly variety.

    General advice regarding not getting murdered by an enraged boyfriend/husband (aside from not fornicating with his squeeze) would be welcome. I don’t currently own a firearm but might reconsider seeing as how my hockey stick is better suited for bdsm.

    I recall scouring the archives and recall a tidbit amounting to: ‘never give a married woman your address.’ As effective as this advice may be, I find it rather inconvenient.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 9:44 am Tilikum

      never bang any american girl at your own house.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 11:22 am Holden Caulfield

      I’ve subleased places before so as not to bring crazy pussy back to my main house. This is especially convenient if you have a live-in GF. If you have the means, it really is the way to go for flings (married or single).

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 11:29 am Holden Caulfield

      Sublease man. Never bring a married/engaged chick back to your *real* place.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 6:26 pm FamilyMan

      No suggestions for how to cuckold another guy. Can’t you find your own female?

      LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 6:11 am Le Corsaire

      As one who has traveled the path you’re considering, I’d be happy to give you some advice regarding not getting maimed or killed. But first you’ll have to convince me you’re not trolling.

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 6:56 am The Burninator

      A firearm won’t do squat for you Preston, it sounds like you lack proficiency in their use and odds are that if you buy one it will probably be used to murder you directly, which sometimes happens when neophytes think that all they have to do is buy a S&W and not deal with tactical and practical shooting backed with lots of practice. Honest advice, unless you are proficient with firearms and defensive shooting already do NOT go down the path of false security you’ll assume because you’ve shot 50 rounds through a S&W 66-2. Then check into the laws on self defense and realize that chances are that even if you survive, you’ll be going to jail for a VERY long time. You went in armed to a place you knew would be dangerous because of the actions YOU were doing to provoke the confrontation, courts won’t be sympathetic to you at all and badda bing….two years from now you’re ass is traded for packs of cigarettes in the prison yard.

      A better word of advice is to stop trying to rub another man’s rhubarb. There are no shortage of revenge/heat of passion killings done be men to other males like you, and frankly you’re too self absorbed to understand the inherent danger you pose to both yourself and the tramp you’re seeing.

      Doubt you’ll take my advice in the spirit it’s intended or you may well brush it aside with an “I know what I’m doing” but your very question informs that you do not. Find greener pastures is my advice, it’s safer by a long shot.

      LikeLike


  12. on February 14, 2014 at 4:34 pm take her out

    I’ll just leave this here/spot the interracial

    http://lilhub.com/olympic-athletes-aren-t-just-competing-with-each-other-they-re-also-having-sex-with-each-other

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 9:55 am Greg Eliot

      Perpetuating lurid bullshit does neither the chateau nor yourself any credit.

      Go, and sin no more.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 3:35 pm thwack

        You wanna borrow my rope?

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 5:24 pm Greg Eliot

        Politics makes strange bedfellows.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 8:54 am eyeslevel

        Too busy dodging knockout gamers.

        LikeLike


  13. on February 14, 2014 at 4:44 pm Ragnar

    For the first email:
    For the love of God, home-school the boy. It will keep his mind free. His natural desire to learn will stay intact and his contempt for the idiocy of the Cathedral will be his armor against their lies. Immerse his mind in the great works of his ancestors; their art, their music, their philosophy. Ground his identity in the great works. Much of the advice given by CH will become a natural extension of this choice. Do not shackle his mind with public school indoctrination. If you are concerned about his social skills enroll him in a social activity like MMA for kids. Social skills are a subject like any other.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 6:32 pm Zombie Shane

      > “For the love of God, home-school the boy.”

      And even prior to the “formal” homeschooling, shield him from all of the cultural poison which The Frankfurt School will be trying to shove down his throat 24×7.

      1) Absolutely no Sesame Street.

      2) Absolutely no Nickelodeon Channels.

      3) Absolutely no Disney Channels.

      4) All modern “children’s” books must be assumed to be Frankfurt School propaganda & indoctrination until you’ve read them from beginning to end and are satisfied that they are safe to be read to children.

      5) Increasingly, even the [Israeli] Baby First channel cannot be trusted.

      Etc etc etc…

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 10:37 am Charlie Dont Surf

        Are you guys parents – that are actually working this? Or is this some existential philosophy with y’all?

        ’cause your onto a topic here: Raising children – which takes a village – and you’re sounding like radical, doomsday preppers – that nobody wants to make eye contact with.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:08 pm Carlos Danger

        Just turn off the electronic rabbi altogether. We raised our greatest minds without it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 7:06 pm Zombie Shane

        > “Just turn off the electronic rabbi altogether. We raised our greatest minds without it.”

        That’s about where we’re at.

        Almost nothing on TV – outside of AMC and the Nat Geo channels – is free from their odious poison.

        I don’t even watch “revenue” sports anymore [NFL, NBA, MLB, or the NCAA versions of thereof].

        Maybe the occasional late night re-run of Rowdy Gaines broadcasting a national swimming event.

        Possibly some NCAA women’s softball – if I’m really horny for the big corn-fed farmer’s daughter look.

        But certainly nothing that involves Jews or Niggers.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 4:49 pm Matthew

        There are fourteen Oz books by the original author. There are seven “Great Brain” books. There are seven Narnia books. There’s The Swiss Family Robinson and The Phantom Tollbooth and The Wind in the Willows and Watership Down and My Side of the Mountain and Grimm’s Fairy Tales and umpteen colors of Andrew Lang’s fairy tales. Alice in Wonderland, Through the Looking-Glass, Pippi Longstocking, Treasure Island, The Mysterious Island, and Charlotte’s Web and Stuart Little. For older boys, there’s the Tripods trilogy, and the Sword of Spirits trilogy.

        What there isn’t is any need for modern stories.

        LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 7:42 am DdR

      I disagree, homeschooling is a last resort if your son’s socially awkward.

      First choice, all boys’ Catholic school is the way to go. Hanging out with boys all day will focus your son’s energy towards competing against his peers inside and outside (i.e., sports) classroom. Priests/nuns don’t take shit and won’t indoctrinate you with liberal bs. Your son will also receive a Christian schooling.

      If you have daughters, a good high school absent a large concentration of NAMs is fine. But with your son, Catholic school is the way to go.

      LikeLike


      • on March 4, 2014 at 4:52 pm michaelaurelius

        I taught at a co-ed Catholic school for 2 years. Complete shit-lib, toe-the-Cathedral-line on everything. Braindead.

        Went to a Jesuit high school. Excellent education, but plenty of “social justice” thrown in the mix.

        A red pill school should exist.

        LikeLike


  14. on February 14, 2014 at 4:46 pm Ragnar

    Resources:
    http://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Jefferson-Education-Generation-Twenty-First/dp/1615399917/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1392421523&sr=8-1&keywords=A+thomas+jefferson+education

    http://www.amazon.com/The-Well-Trained-Mind-Classical-Education/dp/0393067084/ref=sr_1_26?ie=UTF8&qid=1392421574&sr=8-26&keywords=Homeschool

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 10:37 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      Beware of these dumbed-down books, for neither one quotes Homer.

      Thomas Jefferson: “When young, any composition pleases which unites a little sense, some imagination, and some rhythm, in doses however small. But as we advance in life these things fall off one by one, and I suspect that we are left at last with only Homer and Virgil, and perhaps with Homer alone.” (1786)

      Just as the modern “Christian Inspiration” books and Dalrockian Frankfartians never quote Christ nor Moses, so too do these books never quote the Great Books for Men.

      Like everything in the Orwellian Matrix, they are created not to fulfill the Law, but to Destory It.

      Ye shall know them by their fruits, and watch the decline continue to accelerate, as they market and sell these books, pouring gasoline on the bonfire of the humanities while claiming to save the Soul of Man.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 11:24 am Holden Caulfield

        “I hope they serve beer in hell” – a must read for any future father

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 3:35 pm Baby

        Please don’t mention the forbidden name (it rhymes with “Goldman Sachs”), lest you summon the mighty GBFM Kraken from its eternal slumber

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 3:55 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        it’s not the GBFM Kracken, it’s da mightyz GBFM BUTT KRACKENZ ZLOZOZLOLZOZOZOZOZlzozozoz

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 4:52 pm Matthew

        Books that are great for men are not necessarily great for boys, though the converse is not true. That is, all books that are great for boys are still great for men.

        As much as I love The Odyssey, I’m not reading it to my sons. Nor am I reading them the Letter to the Hebrews.

        LikeLike


  15. on February 14, 2014 at 5:09 pm corvinus

    18. If you are atheist or agnostic, swallow your pride and ensconce him in a religious tradition. The presence of a powerful overseer, true or not, will help ground him and gird his will. This is a tough call, though, because most Western religions have become utterly corrupted by malign anti-white influences.

    In this case, I suggest traditional “reactionary Catholicism” of the kind that Mark Shea hates and which dovetails well with the Dark Enlightenment.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 6:38 pm Zombie Shane

      Fucking Papists.

      Let fucking lice and fleas and mites.

      BTW, where’s Matthew King right now?

      Getting his ass caned by Octogenarian Sister Mary O’Donahue?

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 7:41 am Zombie Shane

        > “reactionary Catholicism”

        Although if you absolutely positively have to be papist, then you damned sure oughtta go full bore and at least be a frigging Lefebvrist or some shit that actually takes all of that voodoo seriously.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:44 am corvinus

        Exactly. Far less sh!tlibbery.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:06 pm corvinus

        Fucking Papists.

        [Like] fucking lice and fleas and mites.

        Or cockroaches. If there’s any group that will survive the collapse of Western civ, and try to salvage as much as it can of it, it’ll be us catlicks. We’ll be the YKWs of the third millennium, so to speak.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 4:54 pm Matthew

        Redneck anabaptists will eat you for lunch.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 7:11 pm Zombie Shane

        WTFE you do, make damned certain that it is fundamentalist as hell.

        I don’t care if you’re a Lefebvrist Papist or a snake-handling Pentecostal: TURN YOUR BACK ON MODERNITY!!!

        Modernity is the mortal enemy of everything about the human species which was ever worth a damn in the first place.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 7:18 pm thwack

        Zombie Shane

        Modernity is the mortal enemy of everything about the human species which was ever worth a damn in the first place.
        —————————————————————————————————-

        Thats right!

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 8:32 am Lee Min Ho

      The church is not a very good idea at all, if the child happens to be gay or Bisexual, the conservative environment or influences will bother him, usually they hide it until their teen years so being honest since the beginning usually don’t happen. How that will make him feel? and The alternative? maybe do it the East Asian way? dunno, they are pretty secular and also pretty happy people.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 7:11 pm corvinus

        The same way one deals with any paraphilia: control it and refuse to indulge it.

        One think you should realize: the gay marriage mania that has swept the Western world has provided a nitro boost for the Dark Enlightenment. Or, at the very least, I don’t think it’s a coincidence that gay marriage and the rise of the Dark Enlightenment have arisen at the same time.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:07 pm Carlos Danger

        Most people don’t plan to have a gay or bisexual kid and seek to discourage it if they know of it in most cases. You’ll have to find a better lead in than that.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 9:45 pm Like a G-6

      The God of the Bible does not pass the null hypothesis test. It is not good (IMO) to introduce falsehoods/unprovables as fact, and this goes for Santa and the Easter Bunny as well.

      There is too much out there that demonstrates that Christianity is not true, and is merely the latest Astrotheological evolution of the ancient Babylonian and Egyptian religions. The characters change, but the stories remain the same.

      LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 4:54 pm Matthew

        Word salad.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 7:47 pm Like a G-6

        Only to those who can’t comprehend.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 9:15 pm B-4

        Only to those who *can* comprehend.

        LikeLike


  16. on February 14, 2014 at 5:20 pm Ovid

    Stumbled upon this:

    http://www.city-data.com/forum/relationships/2050873-my-conclusions-about-pua.html

    If anyone bothers to post a response be sure and share it with us here.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 5:56 pm FamilyMan

      There’s a bunch of responses so far, this is the funniest to me:

      [i]PUA is stupid. I never experienced it but glad I didn’t. I also see most guys attracted to PUA are either:

      a. douchebags
      b. low lives
      c. has low self esteem
      d. chauvinists

      Just wow I honestly don’t know how any self respecting woman can be wooed by this non sense. [/i]

      Um, the point is not to woo women.

      LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 11:25 pm ACG1

      These guys seem to have the common misconception that PUA entails putting on a scripted, elaborate dog and pony show for the girl… and I can see where they get that (Mystery, etc.). PUA needs to be rebranded more as a state of mind and less as a set of bizarre routines.

      LikeLike


  17. on February 14, 2014 at 5:37 pm FamilyMan

    Comments on CH’s advice to the mother, most of which I agree with.
    (6) Weightlifting too early can inhibit height growth. Not a good trade. I don’t think girls care much about muscles anyway, they impress other men more than the chicks.
    (10, 20) I wish I knew how to get my kids away from the computer screen and out into the fields. We live in a lovely open area where there’s tons of opportunity for messing around, but computers are so addictive these days. Much moreso than when CH was a kid. If your son is bright, I don’t know how he could resist the lure of the internet
    (14) Or a piano keyboard for his fourth birthday. Yes, that early. And some lessons, from the strictest most classical teacher you can find. That’s typical background for musical professionals, so it will bring out whatever natural talent he has. He might like violin more than piano, it’s even better if he could try both around 4 years old. My younger son started violin at 8, which is too late in some ways, but he had the early piano background
    (15) Brilliant, I will have to do more of that with my own kids, thanks for the advice CH.
    (16) My own boys respond well to clear objective criticism. As long as there’s love in it, they know.
    (18) My approach to this was we read the Bible together. No need for some half-baked business entity that misrepresents the Bible, we’ll just learn the source document behind much of Western civ. and go from there. I think GBFM would approve. 😉

    LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 5:11 pm Carlos Danger

      10, 20) I wish I knew how to get my kids away from the computer screen and out into the fields. We live in a lovely open area where there’s tons of opportunity for messing around, but computers are so addictive these days. Much moreso than when CH was a kid. If your son is bright, I don’t know how he could resist the lure of the internet

      Confiscate them and put them under your control. Give them research assignments to do. Think outside of the box. I once had a coworker who argued with her 17 year old son all the time. He would go in his room and slam the door and turn up Rap music really loud. I took off the door for her. A week later she was telling me about how much they talked now and how his behavior had changed for the better.

      LikeLike


  18. on February 14, 2014 at 5:44 pm Greg Eliot

    I’ve noticed a lot of the self-styled PUA meisters on the forum use a surfeit of lol as well.

    Too much texting? Or a tell on their over-abundance of chick-like snark?

    Come to think of it, too much texting is a tell as well.

    LikeLike


  19. on February 14, 2014 at 5:52 pm Redbeard

    CH is an oil driller? lol

    LikeLike


  20. on February 14, 2014 at 5:56 pm Customer Service

    If you keep writing posts about parenting and how to raise your kid without suffocating them with pretty lies you will hit mainstream my friend.

    No articles get shared more on the internet than those that can potentially give your offspring a better chance at survival.

    You’d be surprised at how un-PC die hard liberals can get when dealing with their kids (why else did they moved to the suburbs).

    It’s a good way to gain ground for the Dark Enlightenment.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 9:48 am Tilikum

      i agree. been thinking about doing this myself.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 6:29 pm FamilyMan

      But please don’t do it if you have no experience as a parent.

      LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 4:56 pm Matthew

        No, you need to be a grandparent to have any practical wisdom on this topic worth sharing. Your parenting success cannot be judged unless your children have children.

        LikeLike


  21. on February 14, 2014 at 6:03 pm lozozlo

    most Western religions have become utterly corrupted by malign anti-white influences

    To be more precise…the many of the churches have been so corrupted, not the actual religion itself. Hence the increasingly frequency of the term churchianity to distinguish that from a traditional, more ancient form of faith.

    The Christianity one sees in say, The Song of Roland would give the modern beta-niceguy pastors an aneurysm.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 11:42 pm Arbiter

      Religion for children? Might as well give them Sesame Street and say hey, the puppets teach that you should share your apples in the school yard and that’s enough.

      Religion says you make better men by telling them lies, and killing those who don’t go along. Religion, like every idiot, has the solution to every problem, yet utopia somehow always fails to show when religion has a society in its death grip. As for Christianity, is it the basis of good values? Compare Christian Blacks in New Orleans after Katrina, Christian Blacks in Haiti after the earthquake, to the behavior of non-Christian Japanese in the Tohoku region after the earthquake and tsunami. In which cases was there looting, where was there murder? Take one thousand Whites raised without hearing of Christianity, and a thousand Christian Africans, put them on separate islands with tools and basic supplies and then leave and see which do best.

      Catholicism is majority non-White and its leaders have always worked hard to increase non-White participation. Christianity has included and welcomed non-Whites from day one; Jews were at times restricted in where to live and what to work with, but the restrictions were against a competing religion, not a competing race: the Jews who changed their religion saw the restrictions lifted. Christianity adapts to whatever ideology is dominant at the time, which is why it appeared conservative in the past, and so the fools today wonder why their churches have “deserted” them. Of course they did, because the one thing they will not desert is power.

      Christianity adheres to whatever belief is in charge, but still always slips its slave morality into the picture. The strong are bad and the weak are good – that is how it won converts among the slaves and servants in the Roman Empire, and that is its default strategy. “You are good for turning the other cheek” is what the servants and slaves who could not strike back wanted to hear. “The first shall be the last and the last shall be the first”, an assumption that the successful in society are evil, is the prototype for socialism. “All men are brothers in Christ” peddles Christianity, in order to bring in as many fools as possible. Thus when European Empires started expanding over the world the priests demanded that they be allowed to come along, onboard ships paid for by the sweat of people who actually create wealth for a living, so that they could baptize the conquered non-Whites. This became the only allowed justification for conquest, in a world where all tribes and all peoples had conquered whenever possible. Only Whites were tied to an unselfish, universalist morality. When enough non-Whites had been baptized, colonies had to be justified by “uplifting” the natives – building schools and hospitals, sending the sons of African chieftains to London for education. And when that was done? Then no moral justification remained, and Whites were forced to give up their colonies. The French were not allowed to throw out the Moors from Tunisian and Algerian cities. Spaniards were not allowed to fire on the Arab hordes pouring across the southern border to Marocko in an organized conquest. Socialists cheered and their propaganda was everywhere: Whites were evil for having conquered.

      With Whites bogged down by Christian morality, which said conquest in itself is evil, they had no reply. Whites became self-hating, and agreed that their nations must be colonized by non-Whites to atone for their “sin”. The Christian churches rejoiced, because while Whites are still tied to its morality they have stopped filling its pews, understanding as they do that rain is a natural process and not the result of angels crying, and that the earth is round and not flat like Hebrew nomads claimed. The lower the IQ and actual knowledge in a group, the fewer the fools paying for the religion racket. Notice how lower-IQ peoples are more religious than the rest, even while they all share the same country. Churches therefore join the socialists in viewing mass immigration as their next logical step for mass recruitment.

      No, that is not the way and never was. We Europeans could take Christianity and fill it with some good stuff for a while, because we had enough of the good stuff in our traditions from the beginning, but Christianity is and always has been a racket with no loyalty to us. Any hopes tied to Christianity today will fail. You will stand there forever dumbfounded, like people who vote for a Bush and then wonder why he advocates mass amnesty for illegal aliens. It is only when Whites shake ourselves from the Christian slave morality and find a morality based on progress, real and unapologetic progress with real-world goals and not “universal rights” as the measure of the value of all things, that we will move forward.

      LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 2:21 pm eyeslevel

      Pope praises white genocide.
      http://whitegenocideproject.com/pope-praises-swedens-genocide-against-white-people/

      And some people want normal whites to support an organization promoting their destruction on a genetic level.

      LikeLike


  22. on February 14, 2014 at 6:10 pm behindtheberezina

    The Vestal Virgins. They had it all unless they should give up the cherry. Knowingly, they faced the punishment of immurement, essentially live burial, for their weakness. In a millennium this purportedly happened ten times. My mission is to learn who those men were and how they did it. (Not to take anything away from the excellence I find here, but Jayzus, I has to know.)

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 5:37 am SFG

      What makes you think they always got caught?

      Besides, I’m sure a lot of them were ugly women with no other options. We only know a tiny bit about the ancient world, which is part of what makes us think everyone was so brilliant.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 1:15 pm behindtheberezina

        I’m sure there were plenty more who never got caught. I threw in “purportedly” to cover that. Maybe they were so ugly they couldn’t get any lesbian action and settled. You’re right to say we don’t know much. We do know vestals were released from their obligations while still young enough to have children, though, which makes me suspect all the more that certain men were able to construct some aura of irresistible lure. One thing I’m confident about: when it comes to alpha disregard, bedding a vestal is a classic example. Times ten.

        LikeLike


  23. on February 14, 2014 at 6:45 pm Director

    Sitting here in the Iceland of the Galleria, I am surrounded by Zulu.

    We are so fucking doomed it makes me laugh like a Hyena.

    This is Africa…USA.

    Goddamn Lincoln. Goddamn him.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 7:06 pm Preston

      hahaha – ‘god’

      LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 7:52 pm whiskeysplace

      Lincoln had plans to deport all freed slaves to Liberia or Belize. Damn John Wilkes Booth. Lincoln did not like Blacks, he fought off a Black murder attempt on a raft outside New Orleans in his late teens.

      LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 9:32 pm Director

        This is basically myth. Lincoln was a negrophile pandering to white supremacists in the north.
        It’s like Hitler’s professed admiration for the British Empire.

        Yeah sure dude, so you pile up 400,000 dead white dudes and you want to repatriate 4,000,000 blacks?

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 10:28 am Carlos Danger

        No its not a myth. It’s well documented in his writings. He was also negotiating with Nicaragua to take them.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 9:36 pm thwack

        whiskeysplace

        Lincoln had plans to deport all freed slaves to Liberia or Belize.
        ——————————————————————————————————

        Nope, that was just ear candy for all you white proles.

        Every African slave in America was monetized from the moment they stepped off the boat (just like you are today with your birth certificate name in all caps)

        Each black person represented a unit of future labor (just like you do today); future labor that had already been traded, bought, sold, lent…

        In other words, the black slaves lives were already spoken for long before they were “freed”

        Just like yours is today.

        The system has a credit card in your grandchilds name and they are using it to buy things from China TODAY.

        So no, deporting all the black people was never gonna happen because people are money.

        People are the demand that gives the things rich people own their value.

        Imagine yourself alone on a deserted island. You own everything on it.

        But who are you going to sell it to?

        Your shadow?

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 9:43 pm Director

        If only Lincoln were that clever.

        No one could foresee the apocalypse that is the neutron bombed corridor between Manhattan and DC.

        Lincoln actually though that blacks were equals. Possibly even our moral superiors.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 12:17 am Arbiter

        Nope. Lincoln explicitly said Whites and Blacks were not equal, for example: “Negro Equality! Fudge! How long in the government of a God, great enough to make and maintain this Universe, shall there continue knaves to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of demagoguism as this?”

        To a Black delegation to Washington in 1862, regarding the colonization of Blacks back to Africa: “You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly,many of them living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word we suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated.”

        Lincoln in his fourth debate with Stephen Douglas: “I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races. I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people. And I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. … And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

        “I have never had the least apprehension that I or my friends would marry negroes if there was no law to keep them from it, but as Judge Douglas and his friends seem to be in great apprehension that they might, if there were no law to keep them from it, I give him the most solemn pledge that I will to the very last stand by the law of this State, which forbids the marrying of white people with negroes.”
        –Lincoln in the same debate

        “Judge Douglas has said to you that he has not been able to get from me an answer to the question whether I am in favor of negro citizenship. So far as I know, the Judge never asked me the question before. He shall have no occasion to ever ask it again, for I tell him very frankly that I am not in favor of negro citizenship.”
        –Lincoln

        Lincoln was a member of the African Colonization Society, which sought to move Blacks to Africa in order to “colonize” them back to that continent. After his invasion of the South he ordered ships that would transport Blacks to Africa, but he died before he could set his plan in motion.

        He opposed slavery in new states because he wanted them to remain White. Right before becoming president, though, he had supported a constitutional amendment that would enshrine slavery where it already existed.

        After becoming president, however, he was allied to the Northern industrialist interests who had put him there. He had always been their lackey as a lawyer for the railroad tycoons, fighting the demands of farmers who complained that the railroads were drawn over their lands with no compensation for the destruction. The industrialists wanted to keep the government money and goodies flowing, a “corporativist” system that started with Henry Clay, where government money was used to buy industrialist funding in election campaigns. Most of the U.S: Government’s income came from the tariffs in the ports in the South, as there was no income tax. (One of the first things the South did in independence was ban trade tariffs.) The industrialists wanted the South invaded, and so Lincoln started mobilizing and transporting troops southward.

        “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” – Lincoln in his first debate with Stephen Douglas

        However: “My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that.”

        Lincoln found a suitable excuse for his invasion of the South in slavery, which was opposed by the Europeans who otherwise would support the South. Thus came his Emancipation Declaration more than halfway through the war, where he claimed the moral high ground. This speech, however, was not noted as much at that time as we are told today. It was mostly used as propaganda after the war. Note also that the proclamation did not abolish slavery in the states with slavery that were on the Northern side….

        That is not to say there were not egalitarians on Lincoln’s war: there was, and he used them for his own purposes.

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 9:45 pm Jay in DC

        Listen up nigga– lemme show you my PERFECT future. Europeans realize they are orders of magnitude above browns, about 10,000 years or more advanced. So they find their fucking balls again, and go off-world.

        Browns and blacks continue to breed and consume like the low IQ parasitic breeds they are until all resources are gone.

        So what then? Euros have wised the fuck up and removed themselves literally, from the atmosphere, to high places. Not much different than a race that had started at the wheel and ended at spacecraft whilst another species started at spears and ended at spears, get it???

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 10:17 pm Director

        We only need to send about 50 people up. The rest can take care of itself up there…

        Out of Earth event.

        Get my people off this planet!

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 10:36 pm gunslingergregi

        yea they can’t make a realistic futuristic movie it would end too soon or be too bloody I think I might make one he he he

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 11:21 pm thwack

        Jay in DC

        Euros have wised the fuck up and removed themselves literally, from the atmosphere, to high places. Not much different than a race that had started at the wheel and ended at spacecraft whilst another species started at spears and ended at spears, get it???
        —————————————————————————————————-

        What I get is that you Europeons are about 6 or 7,000 years late to the show. A black man named Nimrod already pulled this stunt and it resulted in Samuel L Jackson teaching English.

        *read from the book*

        8 Cush was the father of Nimrod, who grew to be a mighty warrior on the earth. 9 He was a mighty hunter before the LORD; that is why it is said, “Like Nimrod, a mighty hunter before the LORD.”

        Thats right, a big black man, so big and so black, GOD his self had to come deal with him.

        Thats right!

        The first mention of Nimrod is in the Table of Nations.[2] He is described as the son of Cush, grandson of Ham, and great-grandson of Noah; and as “a mighty one on the earth” and “a mighty hunter before God”. This is repeated in the First Book of Chronicles 1:10, and the “Land of Nimrod” used as a synonym for Assyria or Mesopotamia, is mentioned in the Book of Micah 5:6:

        Thats right!

        LikeLike


      • on February 14, 2014 at 11:54 pm Arbiter

        Umm, “Europeons”? “God his self”? And you assume Nimrod is Black because why? Nice try. Come back when you belong to a race that doesn’t have an average IQ of 70 in its unmixed state. Blacks could only survive because they had the Saharan Desern to the north, keeping them isolated from the competition going on in Eurasia. Same as Australian Aborigines could only survive in isolation. If you can’t even invent the wheel or the sail you have very little survival value.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 12:43 am paddy

        Great-grandson of Noah and grandson of Ham was a full-blooded Jim Brown, Blaxploitation movie candidate?

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 1:53 am thwack

        Arbiter

        And you assume Nimrod is Black because why?
        —————————————————————————————————-

        Because his dad was Cush and Cush’s dad was Ham; one of Noah’s 3 sons

        So Nimrod was Ham’s grandson.

        Most white people already know this; what color did you say you were?

        Ham, literally means “warm” or “passionate” as revealed by his sin with his father’s wife. Although Ham first established himself in Sumer, the land of Ham is Africa; more particularly Egypt (Psalms 78:51; 105:23; 106:22). His descendants, however, were first to leave the territory assigned them, emigrating from Asia to the islands and the Americas.

        The Shemites were still in the area at the time of Abram. It is the Canaanites who were “spread abroad” or driven out and scattered (Genesis 10:18) in the days of Peleg and later “divided” by the Gentiles or Japhethites when God “enlarged” them (Genesis 9:27; 10:5, 25).

        Looking at history, whichever region we consider, Africa, Europe, Australia, or America, the major migrations have always been from Asia (Genesis 10:18). In every area of the world where Japhethites have subsequently settled, they have always been preceded by Hamites.

        This pattern applies in every continent, as the earliest fossil remains of man have been Mongoloid or Negroid in character and head shape, whereas those that came last belong to the family of Japheth (Caucasoid). If we study ancient history and technological achievements, which were in many ways the equal of, or superior to much of what we have today, they were founded and carried to that high technological proficiency by Hamitic people, showing an amazing adaptability to the world in which they lived. Their achievements were exploited by the Japhetic people, who became great scientific discoverers.

        The evidence appears to point consistently that not only Africa with its black races, but the Far East, the Americas, and other Island nations with their colored races were all descendants of Ham. Hamitic people were the first to reach the far and distant lands of the world as prophesied by Genesis 10:18, preparing the way for the future. Their inventions and discoveries made a significant impact on the world, and provided inspiration for the Japhethites.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:21 am Greg Eliot

        You fellows have to understand that, when it suits their purposes, even Scripture gets an Afrocentrist twist.

        Mockery is all this stuff merits. Noah was not a negro, Nimrod was not a negro… leastwise, not the Nimrod of Babylon (Babel) fame.

        However, some of the nimrods here at this site who babble on, well… take your pick from negroes a-plenty.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:01 am thwack

        Greg Eliot

        Noah was not a negro, Nimrod was not a negro… leastwise, not the Nimrod of Babylon (Babel) fame.
        ————————————————————————————————–

        1. Was Ham one of Noah’s 3 sons?

        2. Was Cush the son of Ham?

        3. Was Nimrod the son of Cush?

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:12 am thwack

        Greg Eliot

        “However, some of the nimrods here at this site who babble on”
        —————————————————————————————————-

        BTW, the fact white people made the word “Nimrod” into a pejorative and continue to use it as such to this very day is more proof Nimrod was a black man.

        “Obama’s sons” is another example

        They can’t stand the idea of a black man large and in charge.

        Centuries from now Greg Eliots sons will be saying: “Obama was not a negro… leastwise, not the Obama of White House (Presidential)) fame.”

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:43 am Greg Eliot

        Like I said, mockery is usually all your babble deserves. Noah, not being a negro, would not produce a negro son.

        Instead of spending an inordinate amount of time refuting your various inanities, only to have them regurgitated weeks or months from now in another thread, I’ll just show one of the glaring errors you make:

        Ham, literally means “warm” or “passionate” as revealed by his sin with his father’s wife

        Scripture is very explicit in what Ham’s sin was, and all the lurid theories about incest and sex are just the product of the usual suspect unsound speculation and profligacy (such as evinced by your ilk).

        This guy explains it well, so I’ll borrow his words:

        There has been much speculation about what it was specifically that Ham did that would be sinful in this matter. All sorts of immoral, lewd, and perverted misdeeds have been suggested in order to explain where Ham went wrong. Personally, I think that it reflects more on the twisted imaginations of the commentators who read such innuendos into the text rather than bringing clarity to the narrative. I see no reason to surmise that anything else happened other than what the Bible says happened: Ham saw his father naked, passed out in drunkenness, and he went and told Shem and Japheth about it. So what was the problem with what he did?

        It has always been the practice of the unrepentant to mock and ridicule the people of God when they fall into temptation. They rejoice and revel in the failures of those who seek to live a godly life and obey the Lord. Accusations of “hypocrisy” are hurled, even today, by those of the world whenever a servant of the Lord stumbles in their walk with Christ. Shem and Japheth sought to cover up their father’s shame, they wanted to uphold his integrity even in his moment of weakness. They knew that they were not beyond temptation themselves and, rather than joining in with Ham’s celebration of their godly father’s missteps, they reverently covered Noah’s nakedness and refused to look upon his humiliation. Sadly, just as it was a member of Noah’s own family who was quick to delight in his disobedience, it is so often those in our own “family” of the Body of Christ who are the first to run and tell others of our indiscretions rather than helping us put our garments back on.

        So, my disingenuous scribe, yet again you attempt to mislead with your half-baked theories and lurid muh-dik imagination.

        And if you’re going to ask “Why was Canaan cursed?”, again, the answer is simple: Noah was making a prophesy about how a leopard can’t change his spots, and the sons will invariably behave like the father.

        This is (yet another) example as to why I seldom bother to go into such detail, and merely choose to mock your n166er-babble… especially concerning Scripture.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 1:46 pm thwack

        Thank you for that information Greg, Its very interesting and Ive never heard it before. My question is; why did I have to come here to find it out from you?

        Where did you hear it from?

        Greg, you know far more than about about theology, religion, the bible, Christianity…

        but if you try to use it as a vehicle to practice racism, Ima bit yo dick ni66a; gonna be some bloodshed up in this muhfuggah.

        Thats right

        thats right,

        read from the book

        read from the book

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 5:27 pm Greg Eliot

        but if you try to use it as a vehicle to practice racism, Ima bit yo dick ni66a; gonna be some bloodshed up in this muhfuggah.

        Says the pot to the kettle: “You’re BLACK!!!”

        Thwack, all your cute little youtube musings do not equal truth… and as far as the Bible and racism goes, well… not only does the OT speak for itself, starting with “God’s Chosen People”… but the good ol’ pioneers, gun in one hand, Bible in the other, made short work of all comers when they felt their destiny manifesting itself… and God blessed ’em for it, didn’t He?

        Or what country you from?

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 5:02 pm Matthew

        Ham’s son Canaan was the one who Noah cursed. Noah was pure in his “generations”, a word which here (and pretty much everywhere else in the old and new testaments) means race. Canaan was the one who got busy with the beasts of the field, thus producing the Canaanites.

        All the other Hamites, so far as Genesis tells us, were also pure in their “generations”. Cush and Mizra weren’t fuzzy-wuzzies, but many centuries later their lands were overrun with the fuzzy-wuzzies.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 5:40 pm thwack

        Matthew

        Ham’s son Canaan was the one who Noah cursed. Noah was pure in his “generations”, a word which here (and pretty much everywhere else in the old and new testaments) means race
        —————————————————————————————————–

        Why don’t you speak english?

        What are you really trying to say?

        That Noah was a white man?

        That Shem Ham and Japeth were all white men?

        Don’t punk out, speak up.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 1:51 pm FamilyMan

        Thwack, not surprisingly you’re blowing smoke. I’ll give you the credit to think it’s intentional. You’re pretty clever in a non-mathematical (i.e. typically black) way.

        The supposed “warehouse receipts” that are our birth certificates are (again, according to this story) pledged by the US to the Fed or a Fed-connected entity as collateral for the issuance of Federal Reserve Notes (or government bonds, which is sort of the same thing, since FRN’s are issued into circulation by the Fed purchasing Treasury bonds with them.)

        The Fed did not even exist before 1914.

        Let me help you by refuting some related theories you might be imagined to be thinking of.

        The First Bank of the United States existed from 1790-1810.
        The Second Bank of the United States existed from 1816-1836 (and continued to 1841 as a private corporation.)

        Other than those years, the government rather than an independent central bank issued the currency. Therefore there would no need for such warehouse receipts. And it’s hard to imagine how that system would have worked in the early years of slavery in the Colonies.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 12:38 pm thwack

        Matthew

        Ham’s son Canaan was the one who Noah cursed. Noah was pure in his “generations”, a word which here (and pretty much everywhere else in the old and new testaments) means race. Canaan was the one who got busy with the beasts of the field, thus producing the Canaanites.
        ——————————————————————————————————

        “pure in his generations”; ok I see what you did there. So I’ll ask you again, are you saying Noah was a white man and so were all his sons? Because it also works the other way around too?

        Unless you are claiming ni66as is excellent swimmers and some how back stroked for 40 days and 40 nights?

        Which is it white man? Say what you mean and mean what you say. Don’t punk out on me. be for real…

        All the other Hamites, so far as Genesis tells us, were also pure in their “generations”. Cush and Mizra weren’t fuzzy-wuzzies, but many centuries later their lands were overrun with the fuzzy-wuzzies
        ————————————————————————————————-

        OK, so where did the black man come from because you know he didn’t come from the white man cause “you can’t get there from here”

        Actually, its the white man that has a giant question mark over his head?

        Please explain that?

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:30 pm FamilyMan

        Yes I’ve read this too. There’s no evidence he loved Negroes. The “Emancipation Proclamation” was just designed to create discord in the enemy side, i.e. the South.

        LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 9:18 pm cortesar

      Vestal Virgins were a potent Rome symbol, it was believed while they remain intact/not penetrated so will Rome
      Their duty consisted of keeping the eternal fire a the Temple of Vesta
      Vesta was goddess of hearth
      Hearth used to be an integral part of home,fire in it,the fundamental symbol of life

      So what do we have today Western Sluts
      Would you entrust them with keeping any eternal fire except the one that ravages their pussies

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 2:04 am FamilyMan

      Houston Galleria? They were sent to you from New Orleans. I hear New Orleans is a much nicer whiter town now though.

      LikeLike


  24. on February 14, 2014 at 7:18 pm Chris from Dublin

    Best advice anywhere is on this blog

    LikeLike


  25. on February 14, 2014 at 8:00 pm Txtr

    A quick note on text game:

    The old rule about no capitalization and no punctuation needs to be buried now that we are in the smartphone era. If a girl knows you have a smartphone, she knows about auto-capitalization and the ease of double-tap periods. It now looks try hard NOT to do them.

    You can still leave out commas or hyphens, and anything fancier, but don’t go out of your way to look like you aren’t going out of your way. Girls spend a lot more time on their phones, they know what’s natural and what’s not.

    LikeLike


  26. on February 14, 2014 at 8:18 pm walawala

    This relates to #5 and #6

    Here’s a zen game thought for all of you based on my experiences of gaming Asian, especially Chinese girls.

    To be successful with these girls you have to show strong intent without showing strong interest. If you can grasp this subtle difference and show some patience you’ll be successful.

    You have to understand the Mystery Method (or better the Girlfriend Sequence) and go through the steps. I’ve banged girls on the first meet that I’ve met online. I’ve done a lot of the pre-work: attraction, comfort, push-pull—online/through text—so that when we meet, they’re clear in why we’re meeting.

    The girl I started banging, Church girl turned out to be like almost every Chinese girl I’ve met: super clingy and needy after I banged her.

    Fortunately with the benefit of experience and hindsight I’m now starting to recognize these emotional vampires early and taking action.

    I see her now a few days during the week and she’s insisting on trying to see me weekends when I’ve got other things to do.

    I told her I was going away for a business trip next week and her response was: “So you’re ditching me for 2 weeks?”

    Then when I didn’t reply she asked if I would bring back some durian–that spikey fruit that smells like catshit and is popular in south Asia.

    Her: “i’m angry too..” (throwing out more beta bait) something I would have taken in the past

    Me: I’m angry too.. (pause for a few minutes to let this sink in)

    Me: I hate durian

    My now ex gf was a master at this stuff and it took all I had to keep my frame. As I slowly lost it, she would amp up the drama and then create situations to criticize me and then suddenly break up.

    Example…last year she texted me that her crazy hoarder mother wanted to move into her apartment for a few months because the mother’s apartment didn’t have air con so could she move in with me?

    I responded saying it wouldn’t be convenient but she could stay for a few days because I worked.

    Imagine…a girl assuming that her boyfriend would just automatically agree to a major decision like this in a text.

    Well…after that she painted me as not caring enough and then broke up two days before my birthday saying it would never work between us.

    I kept my frame, she came back, we had make up sex, stayed together for another 6 weeks and then another drama where she broke up 2 days before a major project I was running that she had promised to help me with.

    I write this for a few reasons: one a warning sign of emotional vampires is this kind of false drama they create. I don’t know about becoming more “beta” but there is a tendency in LTR’s for me to become more accommodating or compromising. With normal, sane girls, this is part of a deepening bond. But with these Cluster B nutcases it’s a sign of weakness.

    In the case of cultural responses to game…calibration is key. Some girls who don’t speak English may not understand “agree and amplify” well enough but the concept is to reframe.

    Secondly, in the Chinese context girls are so used to being pedestalized that when you game them: push-pull, cocky-funny, vulnerability game, they are absolutely blown away.

    I just met a girl last night at a party who was educated in the US. I ran game on her and she hooked fast. I calibrated with just enough attention and ignoring.

    Later in the night she added me on Facebook and I replied with a neg on one of her photos.

    Sometimes these girls do this because they want friendship or they use the plausible deniability of a “friendship” to start contact with you. If you dont’ game them, they can always fall back on the friendship thing. If you take the lead then they can feel like you lead them to it.

    I haven’t gamed western girls for a while so not sure if what i’m saying is applicable to other geographies.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 12:51 pm darkhorse

      You have to understand the Mystery Method (or better the Girlfriend Sequence) and go through the steps. I’ve banged girls on the first meet that I’ve met online.

      Pickup in China is like shooting fish in a barrel. If you are a foreigner with any sort of style and sexual presence, the only “method” you need is the “Hi, let’s go home and bang” method. If that’s too direct for you, you can also try the “Hi, I’m attracted to you,” method.

      From my experience, for any man who likes to go out alone, there is no easier place in the world for a one night stand than China. I’ve had one night stands there with super hot married chicks (oof, one of my favorite lovers. fuck this bitch was bad.), with hot girls with who’ve lost their voice so we could only communicate in a club via hand signals.

      Seriously, it’s so basic there that I once walked up to a party girl in a club and just said directly, “come to my hotel now.” She thought about it a second, agreed, and we banged. One minute interaction, and then a cab ride to fuck town. I used to talk to my favorite foot massage girl about the girls I would pick up, and then I ended up banging her lol.

      China is the D league of game. Actually, that’s way too generous a title.

      LikeLike


  27. on February 14, 2014 at 8:56 pm walawala

    One observation from a cultural perspective on Chinese girls.

    There is this strong desire or pull by Chinese girls to turn their boyfriends into orbiters who “take care of them”.

    “I need someone to take care of me” is a theme I’ve heard for years from a certain type of hotter girl I’ve banged.

    But think for a minute what this phrase means…a girl asking to be “taken care of” suggests immediately that the whole relationship dynamic is in her favour.

    The more guys submit to this dynamic feeling it’s “required” of them, the more they lose.

    So I’ve “lost” out to these types of beta provider guys.

    But I noticed something at a party I went to very recently.

    A girl I’ve known for years who is hot, mid-30’s and very strong-willed now has a new boyfriend. I was curious to observe them.

    This girl has been with 2 other guys who she unceremoniously dumped. I don’t know why but judging from how they acted afterwards can surmise that she likes to have guys as orbiters to give her attention, dance with her, etc etc.

    The new guy is Chinese, not really handsome but looks “nice”—well dressed, good solid citizen, chubby with glasses so that he looks harmless enough. So I could see that there was a reason for her to be attracted.

    But…I could see that while she was gushing all over him, the dynamic was interesting…he lives in another city—so when he comes to town he’s easily disoriented and has to follow her when he visits. Secondly, her friends all like him and he’s very gentle and kind to them. Third, he’s very attentive. He sits with her instead of the other way around. I know this is a new thing, but they seem so…”nice” and comfortable together. You can never truly tell what’s going on behind the scenes but this to me seems “nice”, “safe”. But the girl seems to subtly driving the interaction with the guy following.

    I don’t do any of these things with local girls. But the girls I have gone out with over the years have tried to put me into this dynamic. When I’ve been gaming them properly they: cook and buy me cool gifts, dress hot, gush like crazy when they’re around me giggling, they are more discrete about public displays of affection in front of their friends and overall are much wilder.

    When I start to become more accommodating, responsive and attentive, they distance themselves, pick more fights and get generally weirder.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 9:30 pm Jay in DC

      You are off the mainland, right? Hong Kong? I have banged out some HK and Chinese girls who wanted nothing more than my “round eye”, high IQ, large cock, and large brained babies. I couldn’t do it…

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 10:40 am thwack

        “round eye”
        LOL

        I have a little bit of chink eye gene. My top eyelid goes a little past the lower one, just a little bit; its more visible in the morning or when I smoke the jib.

        Its very visible in my 4th oldest sister who looks like Mae Jemison.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 12:58 pm whorefinder

        SO she looks just like another Affirmative Action case who couldn’t do her job correctly and is just a token for the lefties to try to distract us all with while your “people” burn down American cities.

        Rape!

        (Man, imagine if the internet had been around when the Super Coon, MLK, had begun his b.s.? Woulda been fun to read in about 1968!)

        LikeLike


  28. on February 14, 2014 at 9:04 pm JenkPack Shakur

    To the first emailer 19 of those rules are golden.

    #18 however is utter fucking garbage.

    Reason being is the white race was first brought to the low level it is at today when the Jews forced Christ insanity on our race as a form of mental enslavement which is why all those young 18 year old idiot white boys are dying in the desert on behalf of Jews as I type.

    Countless 18 year old white boys fought and died for Israel and zionism because they think they’re going to be with the big kike in the sky when they die.

    Christ insanity is utter suicidal nonsense and the worst thing a young child could ever be taught.

    You also have the added benefit (from the psychopathic jewish perspective) of scarring and scaring the crap out of the kid for life with the sociopathic Jew Christian hell teaching.

    Instead of #18 as it is you should delete it and simply recommend the mother get her boy in email contact with Varg Vikernes or at least direct the child to his burzum.org website library or his Thulean Perspective blog and teach him about our genuine ancestral white European pagan religions and true white god Odin and give him a genuine white racial upbringing with no Jew mental albatross such as Christ insanity on his back.

    Christ insanity= Communism= Liberalism= Modern day Cultural Marxism= the destructive suicidal anti white multicult= the Jew World Order end game goal.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 5:42 am SFG

      Christianity’s changed over the years. Remember, all the Norse pagans converted to get access to the rest of Europe’s trading networks. It’s a lot more effective for bringing people together to have a religion that tells you you’re all brothers in Christ than one that just deals with your particular tribe.

      Besides, practically speaking all Varg Vikernes is going to get him is tickets to black metal concerts. Which is not all bad, but…

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 10:19 am Carlos Danger

        Reading and writing were the biggest motivators to conversion. Runes were very limited and not a true alphabet or writing system. The Christianity sold to the Saxons and Vikings was also far more manly than that preached today. None of us here could challenge King Olaf and come out alive. I don’t think any of the later Christian Normans would have been much easier. There’s a reason only 7000 of them carved out a niche in the Holy Land, expanded it and held on it for 87 years.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 11:22 am Guerrero

        As a Gay-Bisexual that did need to hide much time, I agree, even worse ,what if the poor child is even a transgender? and the conservative education will suffocate him from his true self? in that way the church will damage him more than benefit, no matter if it provides cohesion or something like that, in my case my parents are religious, in his case they don’t believe in NOTHING, is less understandable, a better cohesion is become part of a fan base of whatever since young, a fanboy of One Direction or Super Junior ,etc

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:02 pm Carlos Danger

        You no make sense. You no talk with dick in mouth?

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 11:29 am Kim Bum

        This.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 9:01 am corvinus

      when the Jews forced Christ insanity on our race as a form of mental enslavement which is why all those young 18 year old idiot white boys are dying in the desert on behalf of Jews as I type.

      “Christ insanity”… aka Protestantism.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 9:49 pm Like a G-6

      And let’s not forget the Astrotheological connections the Mushroom cult (Amanita Muscaria to be exact) of Christianity has…

      LikeLike


  29. on February 14, 2014 at 9:09 pm JenkPack Shakur

    Vajayjayday.

    LikeLike


  30. on February 14, 2014 at 9:20 pm tteclod

    Re: email#1:

    CH is generally on-target, but some realities of parenting appear to evade his experience. Corrections follow.

    6. Introduce your son to weightlifting as climbing, you know, trees, as soon as he’s able. When you start to worry about broken necks, you’re doing it right.

    Do not introduce your son to fashion. He will develop a taste for fashion all his own, and that is what you must steer toward productive effort. Northerner has a good post about this regarding how young women with young men ought steer them to be great men as they age.

    8. If you want to avoid non-white influence, the target number should be around 95% white or better. 100% non-Hispanic non-Asian white is best. Asians are some of the most racists bastards the world has yet created; the KKK would be impressed. Even a 100% white school isn’t necessarily a safe option. SWPL and leftist thought abounds.

    Realistically, you can’t accomplish this segregation in most US cities, and most private school environments are hopelessly leftist or SWPL or both, which means there will always be terrible influences at the private schools (been there, done that with the girl; I won’t ruin the boy with upper-crust idiots and churchians). So, your best option is to expose your child to the morons that go to public school baby-sitting, but take charge of your child’s education and provide a home environment that makes the juxtaposition of his life to the lives of his peers illuminating. A well-prepared boy will shine like a supernova in such environments, all the girls will want him, and his brown-skinned peers will seek his approval. It’s a dangerous world, but the only viable private school option is fast becoming catholic all-boys school, and history along with recent events no longer makes this option a good bet.

    If home-school is an option, do that until at least 6th-grade.

    10. CH is correct regarding over-scheduling, however, three events per week is not too much, especially if it’s something he genuinely likes doing. My boy does martial arts. He’d spend 5 days a week there if I let him, but we usually do 3 days immediately after school. His MA teachers are white, for what that’s worth. I make him attend scouts so he’s ready for other stuff. More on scouts later.

    14. Do not buy him a guitar, per se. Do pay very close attention to his interests, and then play to his strengths, as CH advises elsewhere.

    15. Do not teach your son to initiate violence; despite the leftoid baggage out there, this is still a sure signal for anti-social behavior that will not win him male friends. What your son does need is a laser-accurate ability to identify social violence and the ability and willingness to respond with social and physical violence, and the capacity to escalate the violence as needed.

    18. As an atheist, I’ve explored several “faith communities” within my city and found all lacking. If CH has some suggestions for a faith that isn’t driven by idiotic pussies or self-destroying dogma, I’d love to hear it. In the meantime, the Boy Scouts is still a safer bet than other options, is tied to faith, is male-driven and male-dominated, and teaches useful skills with a modicum of SWPL nonsense. Most scout packs and troops are tied to a church. Your son’s association with a church should be based in that male-dominated scout culture, not the female-dominated church culture that presently abounds in all – even muslim – communities.

    20. It is not possible to divorce your son from this world of electronic screens, however, he will naturally seek his father’s approval. When your husband is home from work, your son should spend time with him, and he shouldn’t be in front of a screen unless absolutely necessary.

    And with that said, it’s story-time around here. We’re reading The Book of Three.

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 10:40 pm Exurban

      Re #14, guitars are not in vogue at the moment, to put it mildly. Musical education is a great idea if there’s any aptitude; IMO an electric piano would be a better way to go.

      [CH: Depends what you mean by vogue.]

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:29 am Kate

        It can only ever mean one thing: don’t just stand there, let’s get to it, strike a pose, there’s nothing to it 🙂

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 8:05 am Canadian Friend

        you are a Mad donna ! 😉

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:30 am thwack

        Mudonna lifted her entire vogue routine from the gay black men who invented it and held parties (balls) where they dressed up and pretended to be fashion models doing magazine shoots.

        Most of them died of AIDS.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 9:36 am thwack

        They made a movie about it called “Paris is Burning”. Voguing was like a Renaissance Festival for gay black men.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 5:06 pm Matthew

        Ugly Jewess imitating low down brothers is pretty much dog bites man.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 5:48 pm OralCummings,ya fag!

        When that gay guy comes into the NFL is this what the training room will look like????

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 12:28 pm Kate

        haha 🙂

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 9:40 pm thwack

        Matthew

        Ugly Jewess imitating low down brothers is pretty much dog bites man
        —————————————————————————————————-

        Typical white man interpretation, stunted and retarded by his own alienation and fear of rejection.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 3:16 am Hugh G. Rection

      Even a 100% white school isn’t necessarily a safe option. SWPL and leftist thought abounds.

      This is a good point. How do you know the truth about people you don’t interact with on a regular basis?

      LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 9:04 am eyeslevel

        You always have imperfect information. You always have to play the odds.

        LikeLike


  31. on February 14, 2014 at 9:39 pm Director

    Quick verbal quiz:

    Girl says “unless you are paying my rent and groceries….”

    Girl says

    “maybe I should find a sugar daddie…”

    Two different women not yet with you. Casually dropped statements in conversations. What is the state of mind of either woman?

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 2:21 am FamilyMan

      State of mind: greedy. Looking for new boyfriend who’ll pay more than their current one.

      do you think that’s the right answer?

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 5:21 am walawala

      @Director shit tests both designed to get YOUR hamster spinning about whether you are ready to buck up.

      I’ve heard this from girls I’ve gone out with who say “I want a guy who will take care of me”

      I’ve responded with: “I’m your lover not your brother” or you could reframe it completely:

      “Unless you’re making breakfast for me and ironing my shirts….”

      or “Yah…maybe I should start a harem”.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 4:27 pm Director

        Excellent stuff.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 9:42 am darkhorse

      @Director ; Walalwala

      Don’t even play with this. Even joking around is submission to their frame.

      Correct frame is show them disgust. “You’re one of those girls? I just lost interest.”

      And seriously, you SHOULD lose interest. Because if she is one of those girls, she isn’t worth titty fucking.

      But this isn’t even a shit test. No girl who has serious interest in you drops this shit around you. She’s used to relating to men as supplicators.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 11:32 am Zombie Shane

      > “unless you are paying my rent and groceries….”

      NEXT.

      > “maybe I should find a sugar daddie…”

      NEXT.

      Move the fuck on.

      Get away from these God-damned whores.

      Again: These chicks are filthy stinking God-damned WHORES.

      DO NOT WASTE ANY TIME EVEN THINKING ABOUT WHORES.

      NEXT. NEXT. NEXT. NEXT. NEXT.

      LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 5:07 pm Matthew

      @girl 2: “That’s the wrong kind of threesome”

      LikeLike


  32. on February 14, 2014 at 10:32 pm Anonymous

    I live in Portland Oregon. Even here I can only think of two schools public high schools in the entire metro that may be more than 80% white.

    LikeLike


  33. on February 14, 2014 at 10:41 pm gunslingergregi

    weird thing on schools
    when I went to an all white school only two blacks I got in a shitload of fights
    when I went to a public school in my last two years of high school
    I got in 0 fights kind of weird right

    LikeLike


    • on February 14, 2014 at 11:45 pm Arbiter

      Your anecdotal evidence is supposed to prove what?

      Here’s some better evidence: Washington D.C. schools are given more money per student than in any other American state, in order to act as a Potemkin village. The schools are majority Black. Year after year the students do worse than the national average. So your anecdotal evidence, what is it about again?

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:18 pm Carlos Danger

        In the 20s, DC had two high schools that were very competitive with white schools. It can be done but not with our current methods.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:09 am gunslingergregi

        just an anecdote on life
        learned to fight with white people
        I guess if went to public school whole life might of never been in a fight
        in school anyway

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 9:58 am Tilikum

      seen this.when white boys fight it’s usually pretty serious and its about ranking in the spirit of their K selected dna. black dudes or mexicans hardly ever fight but they posture. they will fight other blacks in the hood, but only when they go full r mode and have huge groups egging them on.

      when a white and a black guy got into it at school….look the fuck out cause unless there were 10 guys behind him to pull of whitey, shit was goin all American History X and the black dudes knew it.

      K always wins in one on one because its what u know.

      LikeLike


  34. on February 15, 2014 at 12:00 am Dan

    Phenomenal advice CH. That said, if husband found out she wrote it he should leave her.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 3:07 pm thrust

      lol doubtful

      LikeLike


  35. on February 15, 2014 at 5:05 am zek

    OT: Literal Cathedral gonna Cathedral: Pope Francis shares the secret to a long-term happy marriage

    “Never finish the day without making peace!” he begged them. “Because if you end the day without making peace, what you have inside becomes hard and cold and it becomes harder to make peace the following day.”

    Praise the Lord, what would we do without the Catholic Church.

    LikeLike


  36. on February 15, 2014 at 5:39 am Swedish Dissident

    During Valentine’s evening the following happened: I met this Chinese chick in Stockholm. It is important to stress that I don’t reside there at the moment, so it obviously means that I have to have some place to stay if I’m spending the night there. This particular evening, it wasn’t appropriate – regardless of my mate success or failure – to crash at any friends’ place, since they too are looking for a Happy Valentine’s fuck with their dates and/or girlfriends.

    Anyway, it was our second date, and since she is, self-stated, “conservative”, I couldn’t bang her the first time. However, the second meeting – AKA yesterday – I came to her apartment and after a bottle of white wine – or before that – she couldn’t resist my Greek-alpha statuary body (I’m about 8,5 when it comes to looks) and we got ourselves in her bedroom.

    Afterwards, though, this little 5.3 yellow peril seriously and with emphasis asserts that I can’t spend the night there because of personal/cultural principles – she doesn’t feel comfortable about the whole thing, she said, especially not with men she doesn’t know enough! To state the obvious: it seems a bit incoherent/illogic that a person invites someone to their home and f****s with that very same individual and then throw them out for the above-mentioned reason. I haven’t had any similar experience at all, not even in East Asia, where girls/women and people in genereal tend to be reluctant to let anyone in.

    At first, I was more than a bit annoyed, but after she helped me to make a reservation at a decent budget hotel in the vicinity I felt rather indifferent – perhaps due to that plus (coitus) neutralizes minus (the girl throwing me out). She also sent me the address and phone number to the place and I even responded “thanks, babe”. It might seem like a typical beta move, but because of any supposed cultural differences and to avoid any sign of pathetic internal wound, it felt like a natural, and perhaps not very important, reaction.

    The girl is about a 7, but I don’t think that details and other contextual factors is that important; just like she isn’t that important at all to me. I just want some opinions about her move and my reaction. Crazy bitch or what?

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 10:06 am Greg Eliot

      You fuck outside your race, you get whatever disrespect (and disease) you deserve.

      Keep it in your pants unless you find a suitable mate, Sven… in the future, try to make babies that actually wind up looking like you.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 10:43 am Swedish Dissident

        Lol, like the girls say in text messages.

        Ps. I’m looking forward to have Caucasian children, some day.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 12:43 pm corvinus

        Ps. I’m looking forward to have Caucasian children, some day.

        If you’re looking for a Chechen girl, caveat emptor.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 1:57 pm thwack

        “We have a problem with Caucasians in our country” — Vladmir Putin

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 2:21 pm Swedish Dissident

        Yes, we have all heard about Caucasians in Russia with a penchant for organized crime and/or Jihadism; and yes, at least partially those people are a mixture of white/European/Caucasian and yellow/Mongoloid populations, which make this equivocal term a bit delicate – not least after chatter about (hopefully) non-fertile “hybridization”.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 5:56 pm OralCummings,ya fag!

        Dont you ever have anything good to say about YT??Boo hoo…..

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 1:58 pm Swedish Dissident

        Lol again. Anyway, I know what I’m doing and with whom and for what reason purpose.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 5:29 pm Greg Eliot

        Lol, like the girls say in text messages.

        Lol, eh?

        Your honor, the prosecution rests.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 1:56 am Swedish Dissident

        My honor is protected, just like other things. And yes, I think your comment was a bit funny, even though it was not intended.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 11:28 am Zombie Shane

      > “Crazy bitch or what?”

      Yes, Crazy.

      Also, she disrespected you pretty bad.

      Pretty horrifyingly bad.

      If you can get out of this situation without having a police report filed against you, then consider yourself very, very lucky.

      Do NOT reinitiate contact with her.

      In the future, learn to recognize The Darkness in these chicks.

      [Although sniffing out The Darkness in a chick from a different race and a different culture is going to be very, very difficult.]

      And realize that it will be almost impossible to “Game” a chick from a different culture, speaking a different language, because [in general] your evil serpent’s forked tongue will have been trained only to work on chicks from your native culture, speaking your native tongue.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 12:59 pm corvinus

      it seems a bit incoherent/illogic that a person invites someone to their home and f****s with that very same individual and then throw them out for the above-mentioned reason.

      It seems obvious to me that she was just using you for sex and is not interested in a relationship.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 2:02 pm Swedish Dissident

        Yes, so it seems. Good for me that I care just a tiny bit, then. And if she is planning to use me again, I am even more prepared for that and will handle things accordingly, or at least with a ‘proper attitude’. (My question was not about finding out that; it was rather about the particular behavior that I described and my particular reaction/response.)

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:16 pm Carlos Danger

        Dude, socialism and multiculturalism have made you guys strange. You have been taught to treat axiomatic evidence as suspect information that can’t possibly be true because it goes against the dogma.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 1:59 am Swedish Dissident

        Dude, I am not part of “you guys” anymore. I live in Sweden but have distanced myself, more or less, from the official liberal-socialism and multicultural agenda. You have to, in order to survive as an individual. But the country as a whole is doomed.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 11:59 am Anon

        Race-mixing is part of the multi-cultural agenda.

        As the venerable Mr Eliot said, if you are such a dissident, stick to your own race.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 12:24 pm Carlos Danger

        Glad to hear it. Just pointing out how much is subconscious and not even noticed. I think Scandinavia will pull its head out of its ass in a generation or two actually. Once Malmo moves to Stockholm many of you will find your balls again.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 1:43 pm darkhorse

      How seductive and sexual were you with your conversation? Did you talk about your job and dreams and then try to move it into the bedroom, or did you talk about the last time you got an awesome blowjob from a stripper? Just sounds like there wasn’t much of a sexual connection. There are plenty of women (Chinese or not) who fuck within minutes of meeting a guy as long as the setting is right, so the cultural bit is bullshit. Just sounds like you didn’t connect and get her mood sexual.

      Regarding hitting ASD like that, worst thing you can do is pressure her, and second worst thing you can do is get disheartened/irritated. It’s gotta be a total whatever to you: “It’s totally cool babe, I understand. I’ve actually been fucking a lot of girls recently and appreciate a girl who can take it slow.” That diffuses you as a threat, and turns the topic back to sex.

      Actually had a bud who had the same exact “I’m conservative” card pulled on him by an Asian woman a couple months back when he took her home to his place.

      I’m a big fan of talking about sex, how you feel about it, how you’re not judgmental about it, how you think it’s fun, how it’s just something you do with your orbiting girlfriends for fun, as transition point before the actual act of sex. Ideally a discussion like this gives you time to connect with a women, shows you are actively desired by other women and not desperate dude in search of a nut, and shows you know what the fuck you’re doing. Because if you indeed know what you’re doing, and you are cool and have a connection with her and can prove that you’re not going to be a schmuck who loudmouths his sexual exploits to his buddies and makes her feel like a whore, then she ultimately will want you to take her to orgasm land.

      Also, don’t listen to angry nerds like Greg Eliot. He’s having a bad day and actually lacks the social skills to bang bang women outside of his race. Bang whomever you want, make sure to wear a condom, the point is that you actually enjoy the woman’s sex and company.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:48 am Greg Eliot

        Also, don’t listen to angry nerds like Greg Eliot. He’s having a bad day and actually lacks the social skills to bang bang women outside of his race.

        Cathedral litany and Cyberian outhouse psychoanalysis?

        Geez, we’ve never heard those before, here at the chateau.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        For the record, it takes no great “social skills” (what are you, a broad?) to bang nonwhite women. In my experience, they’re pretty much there for the taking, when you’re a good-lookin’ Aryan man.

        A far more viable “social skill” is not acting like sex is some frivolous endeavor in which he who muh-diks his way through his youth is king of the hill.

        Our decaying society is already too full of you clowns and the results of your profligacy.

        You pseudo-red pill fairy.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:30 am Swedish Dissident

        Thanks for the response.

        Our conversation was about a lot of different things – for instance job/career, but also the world economy and Chinese movies, at first rather factual and neutral but still sanguine to some degree. As we where drinking more wine and talked more about nutrition/fitness and that sort of things, I was able to impress her and boost my current and so to speak future SMV without straining myself or bragging (I am in really good shape, which see noticed, and said that I will be in even better shape before summer, which sort of “undermines” her own personal goals to get in better shape, hence elevating my physical/sexual status and making her feel behind me in that regard).

        The sexual setting was good indeed, but far from magical or perfect.

        “Regarding hitting ASD like that, worst thing you can do is pressure her, and second worst thing you can do is get disheartened/irritated.”

        You’re right. The point is that I only “pressured” her to the extent that I said that it would be practical for me to sleep there and that it would cause me some trouble not be allowed to – I was more concerned about individual warmth/safety than leaving her warm pussy, which she might have noticed, for good or for bad. Since she insisted on not letting me spend the night there, I didn’t say anything at all that sounded moody, and the short text conversation, which ended the night, had some positive vibes.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 1:53 pm darkhorse

      Lol…of you fucked her? lol…forget my last post. (Except for the part about Greg Eliot.)

      No, it’s not weird at all. Asian sex customs are different than Western sex customs. Less guilt surrounding sex means there’s far less fake ceremony to make fucking for the hell of it “okay”.

      Girls kicking you out or leaving your place immediately after getting fucked, or not getting pissed if they take you home on a ONS and you leave immediately after is not that uncommon.

      Corvinus is right. She most likely just wanted to fuck you.

      Keep this in mind: there’s a very good chance she has a boyfriend or husband. Her behavior is consistent with that scenario.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:54 am Greg Eliot

        Notice the two (count ’em, two) lols from this self-styled Lochinvar of the boudoir.

        As per a current subtopic, you girly men seem to laugh a lot.

        LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 5:54 pm OralCummings,ya fag!

      “…can’t spend the night there…” Maybe she got some Swede lunkhead paying da rent on her place and he is due home from his job at the–what do Swedes do? Milking the cows or some shit– any time chop chop! Me so horny me love u rong time. No tickee no shirtee! Maybe you not make her COME!

      LikeLike


  37. on February 15, 2014 at 6:02 am PA

    as a father, I can tell you I take advice from all over, intended and unintended, and filter it. I don’t have all the answers and at least one of CH’s points resonated with me as something I should improve

    Well said, up-thread by FamilyMan.

    LikeLike


  38. on February 15, 2014 at 6:22 am Jessica

    Despite my own agnosticm, I think you’re right about inculcating a religious or at least a benign universe type of worldview in your young son. This will fortify his psyche and allow him to reject the nonsense when he’s older.

    Also, when boys are young and still oblivious to the charms of females, prepare him for romantic heartbreak by universalizing it. Let him know that he will be hurt by girls, that it’s natural in every age and culture, even though it will feel uniquely awful to him. Explain those feelings are only chemicals and the heartbreak is ALWAYS temporary. Compare it to a stomach virus where you feel wonderful after violently puking. Make him realize that women -even good women- are replaceable. Give him this lecture once a year and then when relationship disaster strikes, he’ll be somewhat inoculated.

    LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 1:33 pm FamilyMan

      I’d prefer to teach him not to respect girls. That way he’ll treat them right, get more attention, and come closer to actually not giving a shit if one flakes.

      LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 5:11 pm Matthew

      “Despite my own agnosticm, I think you’re right about inculcating a religious…”

      “Also, when boys are young and still oblivious to the charms of females, prepare him for romantic heartbreak by universalizing it. Let him know that he will be hurt by girls, that it’s natural in every age and culture, even though it will feel uniquely awful to him.”

      Die in agony from an overdose of clown rape, you devil in sweatpants.

      This is dead wrong. The right answer is to prepare him for breaking THEIR “hearts”.

      LikeLike


  39. on February 15, 2014 at 6:27 am Kate

    Congratulations on the little bambino!

    Two words: arranged marriage. “Young people can’t decide these things for themselves.”

    LikeLike


  40. on February 15, 2014 at 6:32 am Glengarry

    #1: You should also have him do some semi-serious athletics. Apart from fitness, it’ll teach him how to compete (win and lose). If he’s smart, you probably want to find someplace more analytic, working out how to win. That’ll be good too.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 11:18 am Zombie Shane

      In this day and age, the fitness trumps even the competitiveness stuff.

      Under no circumstances – in no way shape manner or form – can you allow your own flesh and blood children to become land whales.

      Must. Not. Happen.

      LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 12:04 pm Anon

      Weight-lifting is the real deal.

      Athletics are fine, but only if he has a real talent or above average skills. Otherwise, he’ll just end up hating sports.

      otoh, very few can fail at bodybuilding (if they know what they’re doing).

      LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 1:34 pm FamilyMan

        But if you build tight muscles too early, you’ll inhibit bone growth. For temporary advantage you’ll get a permanent disadvantage. Not a trade I would make, certainly not for the sake of impressing some girls at school.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 7:28 am The Burninator

        That’s true but only to an extent. The same thing for archery. I think the acceptable “no damage” age is after 13 or so?

        LikeLike


  41. on February 15, 2014 at 6:34 am PA

    Make him realize that women -even good women- are replaceable

    It’s hard for rational talk to overcome emotion but I once managed to get through to a friend who got dumped by a girl who he thought was “special.” I told him that the only thing that makes a girl special is if she loves him. When she no longer has those feelings for him, she is no longer special.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 10:02 am Greg Eliot

      Excellent.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 10:51 am Lara

        I agree. It’s the best love advice I’ve ever heard.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 11:09 am Lara

        For a man, anyway. Doesn’t work quite so well if you’re a woman, unfortunately.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 10:57 am walawala

      @PA excellent, a great new affirmation for me to re-enforce that going No Contact is the only way to get past this.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 11:44 am Amy

        I read your posts and you’re doing the right thing. There’s someone better out there for you. Many, in fact.

        LikeLike


  42. on February 15, 2014 at 8:16 am dick fuel

    ‘CH bestseller.’

    holding youto it

    LikeLike


  43. on February 15, 2014 at 8:19 am dick fuel

    the foundational difference between genders is simply that

    men are expendable.

    women are interchangeable.

    LikeLike


  44. on February 15, 2014 at 8:41 am TheGenXFuture

    Regarding email #1 and point 8 about schooling being 80+% white. I respectfully submit that the minimum is too low. You would be amazed at how much dysfunction a few subs can cause. I know from experience and observation. If you have this percentage in school, you also have this percentage in the community, not good. In high-end white communities there is never more than 5% or much less functional equals in the black category.

    Also, avoid Catholic schools as many times they become beta training grounds with misplaced and inappropriate discipline. If the public schools of your area suck, the area sucks. If you have to pay for schooling, home school instead.

    Let your son know that if he has to deal with a bully with a punch in the nose or giving a beating, you will back him regardless of what the school does. He only gets backing from you if he dealt with something that he did not personally cause. They want to punish him or throw him out, you let him know that you got his back. Do whatever you feel like with the school admin as long as it is some form of fuck you. This is very important if you are stupid enough to send a kid to parochial school.

    Another general point that applies to the female writing the email. You are not the disciplinarian or the leader of the house. In other words, you are doing a good thing, but the temptation is to be seem as the source of knowledge and what is right. Focus on doing and not talking and you will continue the journey. If you have a skill or calling let your son see you work hard, not be a BS’ing feminist in the work world. Same applies to the home.

    Good luck.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 10:01 am Greg Eliot

      Agreed on the percentage issue… 20% is awfully close to the celebrated “tipping point” (usually, and charitably, mentioned at 25% to 30%) of a school or neighborhood where nonwhite presence starts making the environment intolerable for whites.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 10:37 am Pluviophile

        Diversity is chaos, indeed. In elementary through high school, I’ve seen everything from blacks pulling a teacher’s pantyhose down to her ankles to a black girl slicing another black girl’s face, in class, with a thin razor. Funny, I still remember their names: Otis and Ebony.

        These schools were 95 plus percent black.

        I should have a PhD in black studies.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 2:41 pm OralCummings

        Oy! A book you should write!!

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 6:12 pm Carlos Danger

        In the early 90s that tipping point figure was 8%. I still think its south of 15%.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 11:16 am Zombie Shane

      > “how much dysfunction a few subs can cause”

      Subs = Sub-literates?

      Or Subs = Sub-humans?

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 1:50 pm TheGenXFuture

        sub-humans

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 1:59 pm thwack

        untermensch

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 5:30 pm Greg Eliot

        A sub ain’t nuthin’ but a sandwich.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 8:34 pm thwack

        not when its full of seamen.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 7:01 pm Greg Eliot

        The Rear Admiral likes his subs long and hard and full of seamen.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 7:12 pm thwack

        He was forced into early retirement because he rectum.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 2:43 pm OralCummings

        A few “subs” can also mean subways! When public trans,esp rail, is extended into nice areas,the vibrant youths will often follow,wrecking the shopping centers and the movies.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 1:56 pm darkhorse

      I respectfully submit that the minimum is too high. I would much rather send my kids to a school full of Asians and Indians than whites.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 8:05 pm FamilyMan

      “nonwhite” includes hispanic (even hispanic white, to most people) and asian. So you can be 20% nonwhite and only 1% black. Hispanic and asian don’t do the damage that a critical mass of blacks does.

      Asians don’t abide bad schools, so their presence can be a signal of adequate quality. But you’ll have to compete with their hard work. Have them as friends and it can be win/win.

      Agree fully about the likely outcome when there’s a high percentage of blacks. Public schools in good neighborhoods may have about the best insulation against this, since they don’t have to engage in a diversity-compliant selection process of their student body.

      Obama is trying to eliminate this loophole by forceably integrating white neighborhoods, but so far the resistance seems to be holding — knock on wood.

      LikeLike


  45. on February 15, 2014 at 8:56 am Uncle Elmer

    Sorry to get off-topic here, but apparently your Uncle Elmer is the only person on the planet who sees the truth about the Cheerios inter-racial TV ads. I am getting unhinged over this.

    Am I alone in recognizing that General Mills makes big money pushing low-nutrition cereal (at huge markup) through EBT-accepting convenience store outlets in disadvantaged communities, and that numerous media outlets are on the GM payroll to gin up phony controversy over non-existent “racists” who allegedly don’t like the ads? To add insult to injury, cereal require consumption of milk, which is anathema to African-Americans. General Mills is promoting Black obesity and diabetes while fleecing taxpayers and depriving under-privileged communities of money that could build infrastructure, commerce, jobs, and ultimately, self-reliance.

    I posted this question to the blog of Kevin Hunt, General Mills social media blogger, but it was deleted, not sure why :

    http://blog.generalmills.com/2014/02/what-makes-a-great-big-game-ad/

    Hi Kevin. It is exciting for a major corporation to take a risk by hiliting the changing demographics in this country with a great ad showing a functional inter-racial family!

    As you work for General Mills, can you tell us what percentage of their annual revenue is made selling cereal products through EBT transactions? This info would help progressive consumers in convincing their friends how General Mills is promoting diversity and stimulating opportunity in disadvantaged communities, not to mention informing African-Americans on the health benefits of high-carb cereals consumed with massive amounts of dairy products.

    And yeah, I will be reaching for some General Mills products for my kids next time I am at the convenience store picking up a Slim Jim and a pack of smokes.

    Keep up the good work General Mills. It would be great if that charming little girl and her inter-racial parents got a TV series contract out of this to headline alongside “What Would You Do?” and really stick it to all the racists and ne’r-do-wells who don’t want to accept that it’s not just a hetero-sexual white people’s country anymore.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 9:26 am Carlos Danger

      I haven’t seen it yet. I watch mostly stuff that appeals to men, if I watch at all. If my wife didn’t want TV, I’d do away with it because I don’t like to pay people to insult me.

      LikeLike


  46. on February 15, 2014 at 9:47 am Prof. Woland

    Excellent advice on parenting.

    LikeLike


  47. on February 15, 2014 at 9:56 am j

    In my mid forties now and I have traveled all over the world. A successful, fit white guy with game has the highest mate value for men, no question about it. Top level Asian and South American women will claw each other to get with those blue eyes.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 9:59 am Tilikum

      yes indeed.

      LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 10:44 am Pluviophile

      I have brown eyes, but I belong to Haplogroup I1a. The fellow in my gravatar pic belongs to the same.

      Ladies love them some Haplogroup I1a.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 2:17 pm Uncle Elmer

        They don’t call us “squareheads” for nothing.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 2:18 pm Uncle Elmer

        He’s a spittin image of young Elmer BTW.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 10:49 am thwack

      You fuck outside your race, you get whatever disrespect (and disease) you deserve.

      Keep it in your pants unless you find a suitable mate,… in the future, try to make babies that actually wind up looking like you.

      LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 2:55 pm Greg Eliot

        That’s the first thing you’ve written in quite awhile that makes complete sense… Eliot Osmosis Syndrome? lzozozlzlzozozlzlzlzl

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 10:57 am Uncle Elmer

      Very true. I have blue-green eyes and have experienced this throughout my life.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 12:45 pm corvinus

        Same here… and even within the USA, it seems I get more interest from brown-eyed white girls than blue-eyed ones. Although that could also be because I prefer blue eyes in girls.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 12:57 pm Amy

        I don’t know… I’m blonde and fair, blue-green eyes and I seem to attract (and am attracted to) brown eyed white men with dark hair. I never go for nordic-looking blondes with blue eyes, and I think vice versa. I wonder if there’s a biological reason for “fairer” whites seeking “darker” whites.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 2:36 pm thwack

        alright, lets not start sucking each other dicks:

        Blue eyes. “Clinically speaking, people with blue or light-colored irises do tend to be more light-sensitive,” says Ruth Williams, MD, president-elect of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and an ophthalmologist at the Wheaton Eye Clinic in Chicago. “This is likely due to the sparsity of light-absorbing pigment in the eye.” The more pigment you have, the less light gets through the iris.
        ————————————————————————————————-

        Here is the translation: light colored or blue eyes provide less visual acuity than darker eyes because their smaller amounts of melanin causes them to “leak” light through the iris limiting the eyes ability to produce as defined and clear an image as darker eyes.

        Its like opening a camera with the film still in it.

        You also need melanin on the inside of your eye to absorb any light NOT connected to the image you are attempting to process.

        This is why most albinos are legally blind.

        This is also the reason why the racist wet dream of producing a virus that only kills dark skinned people is so elusive. The small amounts of melanin white people have are concentrated in the most sensitive parts of their bodies.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 3:08 pm Pluviophile

        thwack,

        Shut up. Greg already rapped your knuckles with the ruler. Do you want another?

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 4:36 pm j

        A fit, athletic black male has higher dating value than a chubby, video-game playing white guy regardless of eye color. Mating value may still be hard for the black guy to overcome however.
        Asian males have the lowest dating value, but may have higher mating value for provider potential. Although most women don’t want kids with Asian eyes, even Asian women.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 12:42 am corvinus

        Actually, one would expect that light eyes would be better adapted for seeing in really dim light, like in the dark forests of Northern Europe. In the blazing tropical sunlight, dark eyes are better.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 8:51 am thwack

        corvinus

        Actually, one would expect that light eyes would be better adapted for seeing in really dim light
        ————————————————————————————————

        Nah bro, that not the way it works. Low light is handled by rod cells at the back of the eye. The more of those you have, the better your night vision. But its a trade off because they don’t do color. Thats what the cone cells do.

        But the key is, photosympathetic molecules like melanin don’t just “block” radiation, their ability to “detect”, react, and respond to radiation is just as, if not more important.

        To sum up, get over it. Dark eyes have better visual acuity:The End.

        The gene for blue eyes is a mutation and a mutation is a LOSS of information. Even on a snow covered glacier blue eyes are still at a disadvantage; thats why you guys invented sunglasses or stayed in the cave all day.

        Now run and tell.

        ************************************
        Because the rods and cones are at the back of the retina, the incoming light has to go through the other two layers in order to stimulate them. We do not fully understand why the retina develops in this curious backward fashion.
        One possible reason is the location behind the receptors of a row of cells containing a black pigment, melanin (also found in skin). Melanin mops up the light that has passed through the retina, keeping it from being reflected back and scattering around inside the eye; it has the same function as the black paint inside a camera. The melanin-containing cells also help chemically restore the light-sensitive visual pigment in the receptors after it has been bleached by light (see Chapter 8). For both functions, the melanin pigment must be close to the receptors. If the receptors were at the front of the retina, the pigment cells would have to be between them and the next layer of nerve cells, in a region already packed with axons, dendrites, and synapses.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 9:07 am thwack

        Octopus are very difficult to hang from trees.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 2:57 pm Greg Eliot

        In re night vision and negroes:

        Smile, so’s YT kin see y’all.

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 2:14 pm darkhorse

      LOL. I’m not sure your theory universally applies.

      – How do you define “mate”?

      – What is the “mating arena”, meaning where do the interactions that lead to “mating” take place.

      – Does the mating arena consist of an audience, or is the arena more clandestine and isolated?

      – Does the arena allow for displays of physicality?

      If your physical variables are 1) race and 2) a single physical feature plus the gift of game, I might be able to pick some 1) dark skinned sub-saharan africans who are 2) completely ripped and have game…who could do damage in the nightclubs of Hong Kong or even Buenos Aires like you would not believe.

      LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 5:45 pm OralCummings,ya fag!

      Like WEndi Murdoch? Beware dem chinee bishes! Dragon Lady! Chop chop

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 7:32 am The Burninator

      Agree j.

      Though green eyes are more rare than blue, and wouldn’t you know it, I have green eyes. heh

      But yeah, absolutely true. Hell a lot of white girls still put a glove in the ring to fight for you at this point in life as well, though one has to be cautious of the quality here.

      LikeLike


  48. on February 15, 2014 at 10:55 am Lara

    I enjoy reading your advice on how to raise a boy. It makes being a mom of one fun and rewarding.

    LikeLike


  49. on February 15, 2014 at 12:27 pm anon

    Your response to the mother of a newborn son was poignant and spot-on.

    For a moment I forgot that we all are, at this moment “plugged into the Matrix pod” along with the fact that technological change is eliminating entire industries and job categories without replacing them. Also forgot that the only hope for this young man’s future in 20 or so years is to attempt to somehow differentiate his custom-labeled generic Chinese made plastic crap from everyone else’s custom-labeled plastic Chinese crap and sell it as better somehow.

    On the bright side, the de rigueur practice of getting an expensive degree from an expensive university that specializes in content-free education and using it to ridicule people who work for a living will have long since played out. Cheers!

    LikeLike


  50. on February 15, 2014 at 12:34 pm Hello

    Procreation is unethical. It’s a gamble that creates a sentient being. E-mail #1 semi-addresses the issue, and sounds like she knows she fucked up, but now she has to clean up the mess left behind, and CH adds his take (more on that later).

    She says: “Is it a mistake to bring children into this world? I figure people had children during declines before, and ultimately the world will abide.”

    Most people get pregnant not even thinking about the tremendous harms that the child can experience. This person, right on cue, asks the question AFTER she creates a sentient being and then justifies it but looking at the actions of others (as if the human race has a track record of getting it right the first time). Sadly, this is what basically everyone does when they decide to procreate. They say things like “hope for the best,” etc. etc., when the dangers of coming into existence are right there in front of you. Now before anyone chimes in with, “you can’t be afraid to live life,” I’m not talking about you. I’m talking about creating consciousness out of your own selfish desire, I’m talking about gambling and “hoping for the best” that the odds don’t fall on you and give you a kid who dies before his first birthday. That’s what procreation is.

    Best case scenario is that the kid isn’t retarded, has 2 arms, 2 legs, 1 head, and that he goes through life with minimal harm inflicted upon him. Worst case is, well, I think we’re well aware of the horrors out there that people suffer through, though we just ignore them and go on living our merry lives.

    I’m assuming that a good amount of posters on this blog have children/want them someday (want someone to call them “daddy” and have something to parade around at events and such, trying desperately to fit in and increase their own social value), and so they’ll defend procreation to their grave, because, well, they have to. I don’t blame them there. They already fucked up by creating the conscious being and the least they can do is take care of it.

    I admire CH trying to help this woman out, after all, he didn’t get her pregnant, but his real advice should be to zip that pussy up if she’s going to think about popping more consciousness out in the future.

    LikeLike


  51. on February 15, 2014 at 1:28 pm Carlos Danger

    Homeschooling is a cure for much of these ailments. One has tremendous resources at their fingertips these days.

    LikeLike


  52. on February 15, 2014 at 3:45 pm Rand

    So how the hell am I supposed to raise the daughter I just had? What is the best case scenario for a female child?

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 4:22 pm Zombie Shane

      Uhh, teach her Anti-Game?

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 7:38 pm Zombie Shane

        By which I mean: Teach her how the soul-less conscience-less sociopathic “Natural Alpha” will game her just enough to get her to submit to pump-n-dump, and how to avoid becoming the victim of it.

        Also, no majoring in Femcunt Theory, or in any other kind of “Theory” for that matter.

        And no mudsharking whatsoever.

        If she tries to pull a “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”, then no more college tuition or room or board for her.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 8:44 pm thwack

        Zombie Shane

        If she tries to pull a “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner”, then no more college tuition or room or board for her
        ———————————————————————————————-

        What good will that do? Isn’t it better you meet the chocolate and disaprove; than have her come home for dinner and pull a “Guess I gotta leave for dessert” on you?

        The look on that old bats face was priceless.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 2:59 pm Greg Eliot

        In the movies, all y’all are Sidney Poitiers… courtesy of YKW.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 6:08 pm OralCummings,ya fag!

        When dear old Sidney was whomping the hell out of Diahann Carroll,even HE wasnt Poitier. BTW Carroll was married to a jew named Monte Kay (born Kaplan). She dumped him for Sidney. Sid refused to marry her. She went back to Monte. Sidney called her agian.She left Monte again! Poor guy died of heart failure at 63. Diseased heart…or broken heart?

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 6:36 pm thwack

        Thats got nothing to do with it. The black man has always been the gold standard of masculinity.

        An unbroken line from Edward of Woodstock to me.

        You can blame the ooj all you want but he is not responsible for the hard wiring of the females DNA.

        Get over it white man.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 6:57 pm Greg Eliot

        The black man has always been the gold standard of masculinity.

        Keep dreamin’, Sambo… for every Poitier there’s a Rochester and an Amos n’ Andy…

        And for the record (keeping it within the industry’s continuity)… neither Poitier or Roundtree could shine McQueen’s or Eastwood’s shoes.

        Gold standard indeed. Beyond The Valley of the LOZOZOZLZOZOZLZOZOZL.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:02 am The Burninator

        “The black man has always been the gold standard of masculinity.”

        Yeah, that’s why it was so easy to drive you into chains and keep you there for centuries thwack. And why it’s so easy today to keep you fawning for and working to preserve a system that makes you second class citizens at best. Every single advancement you’ve had in the last 200 years has been because of the conscious intent of white men acting on your behalf. Make no mistake about it. When white men act like they have for thousands of years no amount of spear shaking and jumping up and down will convince them of your “gold standard” since the evidence to the contrary stands naked before them.

        When white man cracked the whip in the 1600’s, your people went subservient so fast that the collective world’s head spun circles. Historically whites in chains stood up and fought/rebelled with such predictable frequency that our history was formed around celebrating the rebel to authority. Your people didn’t, you had to be let lose by your masters mercies and demonstrated that left to your own devices you were content to pick that corn and have your families sent to the four corners of the earth never to be seen again without so much as a raised word to the contrary. Remember that.

        While it is true that today, in 2014, you’re some kind of idiotic “gold standard” this is a reflection not of your own unique greatness, of which there is none, but rather of how low white men have allowed themselves to be used by feminism which is admittedly our own damned fault no question about it.

        But that only goes so far as well. When I run up against black men in public they are all, to the every last damned one of them, polite and nearly submissive, most averting their eyes and looking down at the ground when our eyes meet in passing. When passing in a hall THEY move out of the way, not me. Yeah, they’re all “gold standard masculine” when they have nothing to compete with, but the moment a traditional white man walks into the room, one that they cannot hope to intimidate and one who does not engage in political correctness and self abasement, suddenly the shine falls off the gold and we discover nothing but cheap brass underneath.

        Back in the day when my grandfather (a tall, massively built Scot) first came here to the states, your “superior gold standard of masculine” black men all approached him with hats off and saying “sir”, I saw it with my own eyes countless times even through the 1980’s/90’s when he was quite old. If you truly are the black supremacist that you play on television you should NOT encourage the manosphere movement(s), since they are reminding white men of their heritage and rebuilding them back into the world conquering behemoths that they’ve always been, even if this is an inadvertent, unintentional consequence of red pill truth.

        Where in the name of holy hell do you get your bizarre fantasies from anyway? New Black Panthers have a new website or something? It’s laughable how predictable your fake history and fake revisionism comes to the surface. When first here I thought you simply misguided or engaging in the normal “hurt reactive” psychology of a victim by trying to proclaim your “race’s” greatness all the time, but as I know you have some intelligence underneath the bluster I cannot help but reconsider that notion. Seems to me you’re just here to bullshit and poke a hornet’s nest. Again, if you’re real, that’s a pretty stupid tactic to take, no matter how many laughs it gets you in the heat of the moment.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:08 pm thwack

        You mad bro?

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 6:34 pm PA

      Right here is good advice for girls (and boys too):
      http://dannyfrom504.com/detinennui32s-advice/

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 8:29 pm walawala

        Pure gold here:

        You will have to break up with girls. There will be many reasons for this.
        (1) She is able to control you, probably because you’ve failed too many fitness tests. You’ll naturally bristle at her controlling you. Just end it. The relationship’s probably too far gone anyway.
        (2) She is cheating on you.
        (3) Her goals aren’t compatible with yours.
        (4) For whatever reason, her life does not fit in well with your life.
        (5) You just don’t like her anymore.
        (6) She nags and complains at you all the time.
        (7) She makes unreasonable demands on your time, attention, money or resources.

        When you end it, do so firmly and kindly. Just say something like “I don’t want to date you anymore.”

        LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 10:39 pm FamilyMan

      Teach her to be an old-style traditional girl. Primarily this means not being a bigtime party girl and keeping her legs closed. I hope she wants a family and children. If she seems not to, she may need a serious talking-to about how many women, once it’s too late (say age 30 or later), realize they wanted this.

      This does not prevent her from competing and succeeding in academics and work — that’s more or less expected these days and will provide her security, as well as meaning she isn’t wasting her years in school.

      LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 1:08 pm Anon

        “This does not prevent her from competing and succeeding in academics and work”

        Actually, it does.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 5:17 pm Matthew

        Which is a feature, not a bug. Raising your girl to compete with men is stupid, and an evolutionary dead end.

        LikeLike


  53. on February 15, 2014 at 3:57 pm Preston

    This is why I only consider vegans for LTR material. Despite everything else, they at least keep fit and usually age quite well. The downside is that I have to pretend like I care about animal suffering. Still beats dumpster diving.

    LikeLike


    • on February 15, 2014 at 7:45 pm retrophoebia

      Are you kidding? Vegan women as a group are the most insufferably self-congratulatory, self-absorbed, self-righteous, delusory, and generally intolerant demographic I’ve yet encountered. Their “fitness” is generally exclusively yoga, being more of a lifestyle statement than fitness regimen and which byproducts include excessive purchases of overpriced athletic gear (lululemon, I’m looking at you) and superfluous reinforcement of their egos (but I repeat myself) for being “fit”. LTR those girls, and I see a bevy of cats, faux-cheese, and dirty looks from your wearing leather shoes in your future. Veganism is like keeping Kosher but with the moral imperative of the Mirror and the Herd instead of the Word.

      As a side note, I knew and (briefly) dated a several-years vegan who, once she started actually lifting weights, gave up veganism for good in about 2 weeks. Anecdote (pl) != data, but still.

      LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 11:47 pm Preston

        Nah, not kidding – they look really, really good and for me that’s quite important.

        LikeLike


      • on February 15, 2014 at 11:51 pm Preston

        The type of vegan you described is a hyperbole – there are some down-to-earth chicks if you look.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 8:57 am thwack

        Thats right.

        I got some cowboy boots made of an extinct animal and bitches love em.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 3:02 pm Greg Eliot

        Dodo Cowboy boots, eh?

        You always were more hat than cattle, pard.

        llzozozlzlzozozlzlzlzlzlzl

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 5:48 pm thwack

        There called Neanderthals; and no you can’t afford em.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 6:51 pm Greg Eliot

        Cro-Magnon’s more my style.

        And for the record, I’ve lost more money than you’ve made.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 9:46 pm thwack

        And you lost it betting against me. Thats why you had to come out of retirement and fight all those set ups against those bums and no names…

        You should retire before they have you fighting Zimmerman for charity.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:00 am Greg Eliot

        Somewhat droll on the Zimmerman reference…

        Although that whole “betting against me” was more of the same usual suspect non sequitur n166er-babble…

        And your Rocky 3 references are, at this point, played… soooooooo played.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 2:06 pm PA

        Actually, the plural of Anecdote is Data.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 6:32 pm retrophoebia

        you’re correct. however, the quotation has various attributions & versions. I was anticipating the semi-statistically-savvy-savants that come out of the woodwork anytime someone tells a story about a member of a demographic.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 5:19 pm Hathcock

        I have an old friend from high school who is vegan and has been for 15 years, she is in fantastic shape for a 43 year old (mountain bike racing) but she looks 55 easily. Something about the vegans, they look old before their time, great body but no thanks.

        LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 5:50 pm thwack

        what color is she?

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 7:18 am Hathcock

        White

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 7:33 am thwack

        Well then you can’t blame veganism. White woman need to stay out the sun, or wear a large hat, or carry an umbrella…

        Skin not designed for mountain bike; wind and sun = white woman wrinkle a lot.

        Why don’t you finger pop her? Turn off lights; check if loins be good and tight from biking.

        Also, lay flat on bed; wrinkles and puffyness may be minimized.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 9:45 am Gro Haila

        @thwack

        ROTFLMAO

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:25 pm Hathcock

        Too bad she’s not black or Asian

        LikeLike


  54. on February 15, 2014 at 9:42 pm Like a G-6

    I highly disagree with #18 on your advice on raising a boy. Ultimately I found Christianity, in both Churchian and Biblical forms, to be incomplete and circular. In place of #18, I suggest emphasis on having a firm grasp on reality and hold everything to the null-hypothesis test: if it cannot be proven/demonstrated, it is a lie or doesn’t exist.

    The “God” program can be exploited as long as the exploit maintains itself within the [wide] tolerances of the program, but it’s hard to exploit the reality program, as the tolerances for what is real and what isn’t are much narrower.

    Even without “God,” evo-psych still exists!

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 9:47 am Gro Haila

      … and enjoy ur grandkids (if not even yer kids) bowing to Mecca 5 times a day.

      Well, not exactly Christ-worship, but beats illuminated agnostic atheism.

      LikeLike


  55. on February 16, 2014 at 1:37 pm PA

    This is an inspired list. Re. #8, there is a tradeoff between quality of life and education in a white school and the likelihood that being too sheltered from vibrants will make the kid a naïve liberal.

    I look at this tradeoff similarly to raising children with no television at home. At one point, I wondered if lack of regular exposure to television’s memes can make children lack immunity to subliminal (and not-so-subliminal) anti-white and leftoid propaganda. The solution lies in controlled exposure, like inoculation. Example:

    We have no TV at home, but we watch songs and other stuff on Youtube, where you’ll have to sit through a short commercial before the video starts. This is a good place to mention to your kids that advertising is “how companies try to get you to buy stuff you don’t need.” Laugh with the kid: “geez, look how they’re trying to trick us into buying a __ [whatever product a small child is not interested in, like, say, cooking oil].

    Then make fun of those commercials. In one case, my older son and I waited through a 15-second “goofy white male” ad in which the man kneels before a woman like he’s about to propose in marriage. So I started making light fun of the scenario, saying “everybody knows that you don’t kneel before other people — only before God.”

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 9:21 am Carlos Danger

      There would be a lot less talk about diversity from the chattering classes if some of them had actually served.

      LikeLike


  56. on February 16, 2014 at 1:44 pm Swedish Dissident

    “Race-mixing is part of the multi-cultural agenda.

    As the venerable Mr Eliot said, if you are such a dissident, stick to your own race.”

    John Derbyshire is part of the “dissident right”, yet he produces mixed race children (“the arctic alliance”). I on the other hand have temporary bed alliances.

    LikeLike


    • on February 16, 2014 at 4:22 pm corvinus

      In his own case, he (sort of) has an excuse. If you saw the women in England, you’d rather boff a chinkess too.

      LikeLike


      • on February 16, 2014 at 6:11 pm OralCummings,ya fag!

        He aint zackly Tyrone Power himself,to be fair.

        LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 6:34 am darkhorse

      It comes off as supremely puss that you’re justifying where you are putting your dick to a keyboard jockey.

      LikeLike


  57. on February 16, 2014 at 4:33 pm Hathcock

    If your kids must watch tv, they should start with the original Jonny Quest. Race Bannon and Dr. Quest are refreshingly alpha. The love interest for Race is sex on wheels.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 9:18 am Carlos Danger

      I used to love that show but it was only shown sporadically when I was a kid. No doubt it was seen as subversive to the cause.

      LikeLike


  58. on February 24, 2014 at 1:47 pm pen

    You speak about the book while until now you avoided writing about it, then you also write “when he’s older, the CH bestseller.”

    I can’t wait !

    LikeLike


  59. on February 25, 2014 at 4:46 am jgiupdkg@gmail.com

    How do you remove background music from an audacity file?

    LikeLike


  60. on February 25, 2014 at 4:46 am jgiupdkg@gmail.com

    What is a good Safe, Free, MIDI Creating Program?

    LikeLike


  61. on February 25, 2014 at 4:46 am jgiupdkg@gmail.com

    I? purchased the DVD just for the Karaoke Dance Party! I Thoroughly enjoyed the song choices. One of my favorite characters is Gingy( The Gingerbread Man).

    LikeLike


  62. on February 27, 2014 at 10:56 am Fred Mok

    Great parenting advice. Absolutely fantastic. As the father of three sons, I’ve been meditating on the principles.

    My comments on a couple:

    #2: Pursuing admiration from men (Proverbs 22:29) is a much better endeavor than love and loyalty from beautiful women. It is more lasting and significant. You can have the former without the latter, but the former is more meaningful. If you become a leader of men, you will also lead women but the converse does not follow.

    #11: A mom cannot encourage boyness. She can only give him space to express it. Only a man can encourage boyness.

    #18: What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. If you don’t believe in God but want to give your son religious grounding, he will soon figure out, like so many things about childhood, that what he’s learning is only for his development but not necessarily adulthood. I would only offer my sons convictions that I myself believe and live according to. Children easily detect inconsistency.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Amon Ra on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    trav777 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: