• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Comment Of The Week: Romancing The Load
Disappearing Act Game As A Tool To Attract Women »

Crazy American Women Are Getting Crazier

February 17, 2014 by CH

A very homely, urbanely decayed spinster has taken photographs of herself posed with male and child mannequins, presumably as some sort of statement on the present condition of her bifurcated ego.

If you thought 21st Century American women have plumbed the depths of crazy, you’d be wrong. There’s totes crazy left in those desiccated wombs and cock-ravaged holes where their feminine hearts used to reside. Expect to see a plague of crazy visited upon the women of the West, as the modern diversity industrial complex and no-holds-barred sexual market drives the wedge deeper between their mothering and materialistic desires. We have only begun to bear witness to a total meltdown of the American woman’s psyche.

My advice to American men: If you didn’t get lucky and find yourself a sane, feminine American woman before this late-stage twisted empire in rapid decay corrupted her, head overseas. You’ve got to know when to hold an American woman, and know when to fold her. And right now, she’s coming up 2-7 off-suit.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Feminist Idiocy, Girls, Goodbye America, Hitting The Wall | 394 Comments

394 Responses

  1. on February 17, 2014 at 10:38 am ‘Reality’ Doug

    If she needs anything more than a meat vibrator, SOL, bitches. lol

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 10:49 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      HEY EHASTETIZTZTZ!!! HEASTSIETZ!!!

      SHE STOLE DA GBFM’S THESIS PROJECTZZ!!

      AS A UNIVERISTY PROFERSSORZ, I GET TO TAKE CLASSEZ FOR FREEZ!!

      SO I AM TKAINGPHTOGRPAHRAPHY CLASSES PHOTORGPAHY CLASSESZZ!

      But here tatstes are bad and her model mannequinsz are uglzy.

      Here are da mannequinsz da GBFM is using for his art projectsz:

      zlzozozozol

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 11:33 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        I don’t understand why you need to hold on to a girl though.

        I’ve never felt like I needed to hold on to anyone. If anything, I got bored too quickly and they went crazy trying to hold me down.

        Sexy goddesses turn into disgusting chumps when they turn needy. I can only imagine how needy and creepy these disgusting pansy nancies who try to “hold down” girlfriends must appear to their girls. I marvel how they open their legs for them.

        Neediness is a huge turn off.

        If a relationship feels like work, you’re doing it wrong. OR you’re in the wrong relationship. With the wrong girl. Period.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 9:41 pm Mike

        “I don’t understand why you need to hold on to a girl though.”

        Because stuff isn’t supposed to be the way it is now, even though it’s all our generation has known..

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 3:15 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        Sure. But when was it ever a man’s job to hold down a girl?

        LikeLike


      • on February 20, 2014 at 2:02 pm Goober

        I know it’s old hat, and I know its just a modification of the theme NAWALT, but the fact is, if you had ever found a woman worth holding on to in your life, you would understand. The fact that you don’t is not your fault, it is the fault of feminism and the decay of our society.

        I’m sorry, friend. The truth sucks ass, but you really are missing out on something great.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:10 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        HEY EHSTRISTTEZ HEARTSISTEZ !! LZOZZOZOZOZO DA GBFM is having a great GBREAT TIME AT DA OLYJPICSZ OLYMP{ICS THIS YEARZ REPRESRESNTING DA DECLINENEING BERNAKAKNKIIFIED USA and i do hope to bring home da GOLDZ LZOZZLZOZOZOOZOZOZOZ in tda CURLING EVENTZ and in da pzuuzzyzyzyuzyzzuzy puzuzuzyysyysysysy eating eventsz too:

        zlzoozozoz

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:21 pm Preston

        I find your insightful analyses and avant-garde interpretation of the English language both provocative and thrilling.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 4:36 pm Clydesdale

        Half the fun of a GBFM post is seeing how he is going to further mangle the name, “Heartiste.”

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 10:00 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        HEATRIETSTSET HEATRTETISTETETZOZLZLOZOZOZOZLOEOLZOZOZOMFGZOZLZOZOZOZOZOZOZOZOZOOZZOZOLO!OL!!L!LOZOZLOLZO!LO!O!OL!

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 11:49 am Clydesdale

        Thanks GBFM!

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 11:51 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        ur elexocomnzesz!!!

        lostas cockas 4u in 2014!! lzozlzoz

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 11:51 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        unles syour a dudez

        den lostsa spususysysysysysy pusususysysy 4u in 2014! zlozozo

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:28 am Zombie Shane

      What’s fascinating to me is that she fantasizes about having just one – NOT TWO – children with Prince Charming.

      When the Total Fertility Rate drops below replacement [2.10 children per woman], the population collapses into extinction at a geometric rate.

      This is what it looks like with, say, an initial population of 100 young adults [50 young men and 50 young women], in the year 2000, with a Total Fertility Rate of just 1.0:

      2000: Fifty Men, Fifty Women
      TOTAL: 100 first generation

      2025: 25 sons, 25 daughters
      TOTAL: 50 second generation

      2050: 12.5 Grandsons, 12.5 Granddaughters
      TOTAL: 25 third generation

      2075: 6.25 Great-Grandsons, 6.25 Great-Granddaughters
      TOTAL: 12.5 fourth generation

      2100: 3.125 Great-Great-Grandsons, 3.125 Great-Great-Granddaughters
      TOTAL: 6.25 fifth generation

      And this poor crazy bitch isn’t even actually giving birth to the 1.0 children [the single child] – 1.0 is simply the upper bound of what she is capable FANTASIZING about.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 11:40 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        Well said.

        Then again, if the leftists had any foresight beyond their social rolling in the hays with cads they’d know they’re headed towards extinction, and fast.

        You guys worry needlessly about foreigners coming in and destroying the West. The Western woman has ensured that the West will fall.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:06 pm Zombie Shane

        Look at the entire photo spread:

        * She, Prince Charming and their daughter, Eiffel Tower
        * She, Prince Charming, umbrella in the rain
        * She, Prince Charming, shower in the bathroom
        * She, Prince Charming and their daughter, dinner table
        * She, Prince Charming and their daughter, toboggan on the ski slopes
        * She, Prince Charming, coffee at frog cafe
        * She, Prince Charming, Notre Dame
        * She, Prince Charming, ballroom dance floor

        Just the sheer solipsistic narcissistic nihilism of it all.

        As though Prince Charming were simply an accoutrement, like a handbag or a bracelet or a pair of high-heel pumps.

        No sense of the wonder of taking Prince Charming’s seed into her birth canal and turning it into the fruit of her womb and joining with him forever in The Tree of Life.

        This nihilism is exactly what Oswald Spengler was warning us about:

        http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/GC08Aa02.html

        “It becomes possible for a Shaw to say “that unless Woman repudiates her womanliness, her duty to her husband, to her children, to society, to the law, and to everyone but herself, she cannot emancipate herself”. The primary woman, the peasant woman, is mother. The whole vocation towards which she has yearned from childhood is included in that one word. But now emerges the Ibsen woman, the comrade, the heroine of a whole megalopolitan literature from Northern drama to Parisian novel. Instead of children, she has soul-conflicts; marriage is a craft-art for the achievement of “mutual understanding.” It is all the same whether the case against children is the American lady’s who would not miss a season for anything, or the Parisienne’s who fears that her lover would leave her, or an Ibsen heroine’s who “belongs to herself” – they all belong to themselves and they are all unfruitful…

        At this level all Civilizations enter upon a stage, which lasts for centuries, of appalling depopulation. The whole pyramid of cultural man vanishes. It crumbles from the summit, first the world-cities, then the provincial forms, and finally the land itself, whose best blood has incontinently poured into the towns, merely to bolster them up awhile. At the last, only the primitive blood remains, alive, but robbed of its strongest and most promising elements. This residue is the Fellah type.”

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fellah

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:59 pm God damn

        No we don’t. We all say that.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:45 pm Anonymous

        The men of the West…. are the West.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:29 pm FamilyMan

        The foreigners coming in are worse quality than the wives taken from abroad by men making a choice. Empire always incorporates elements from colonies and abroad. It’s not the same as being invaded.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 11:43 pm Chantal

        American men don’t care about women enough to show it but foreign men do. Take heed, American men lest ye get left out of the gene pool.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 11:44 pm RS

        Baloney. I went to school overseas and American men treat women very well compared to many other cultures.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 11:54 am Matthew King

        It’s the inverted family tree. Four grandparents for every grandchild, now being experienced in Europe. See Mark Steyn, America Alone.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:09 pm corvinus

        I encouraged one married Ukrainian couple I know to put more g—–n buns in her oven, because they only have one son. Unfortunately, there seems to be a cultural preference for only having one in large parts of Europe.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:19 pm irishsavant

        Finesse the reproduction figures to reflect the huge dysgenic imperative at work. in Western countries. The fast breeders are low IQ welfare queens, especially blacks and Muslims, useless eaters, while upper scale women, corrupted by feminism, have few if any offspring.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:57 pm God damn

        Yep.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:39 pm Matthew King

        The fast breeders are low IQ welfare queens, especially blacks and Muslims, useless eaters…

        No longer true. It is useless to fight the last war.

        Regardless, whites have always been outnumbered. We don’t win by overwhelming them with quantity (“r-selection”) but quality (“K-selection”). Outbreeding is the brown strategy, brute force vs precision munitions. That strategy ultimately fails and is one reason why the world speaks English, not Mandarin. Ask the Persians at Thermopylae and the Zulus at Rorke’s Drift and the spics at the Alamo. Or read about how the Raj 3,000 dominated the subcontinent, or the swiftness with which the Boxer Rebellion was quelled. The swarms achieve localized wins over small bands of isolated and surprised men but also conveniently amass themselves for barrel-fish-shooting and gaudy casualty ratios.

        All the pussy pessimism. The drums of war should thrill you, not intimidate you. We have a perfect record against the bugs going back 2500 years, so boringly perfect that we periodically/inevitably turn on our own kind for shits and giggles. What makes you think this Scots-Irish cussedness has been bred out of us in the space of just a few generations?

        Are you the son of world-conquering and dominating warriors? What will you do with the culture and civilization they bled to bequeath you? Whine like a woman and cluck like Chicken Little? Gaze upon the third world’s impotent works and despair?

        The more the enemy breeds, the more efficiently they die, the more are trampled in the panicked retreat. No need for tight groupings, no sniper shots required. Simply set yourself to spray. This strategy applies equally to the Cold Civil War and any hot skirmish that may flame up in the meantime. The only enemy deadly enough to defeat us is our own deficient morale, and you are an anti-cheerleader infecting the environment with inapt, gratuitous gloom.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 2:31 pm irishsavant

        That’s great writing Matt and you’re pushing an open door as far as I’m concerned. In my personal and avatar lives I take no prisoners, easy enough now that I’m in my mid-sixties and have what I call ‘fuck you money’, i.e. enough to live comfortably on even if I never earn another penny.

        But think of the majority of Whites out there. Productive citizens, their industry and prudence fuelling the very drones set to out-breed them. Their livelihoods and even liberty at risk should they deviate from the Cathedral’s orthodoxies. Deprived of political and media outlets, the decks are heavily stacked against them.

        We should have listened to Ben Franklin: ‘those who beat their swords into ploughshares usually end up plowing for those who kept their swords’

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 2:53 pm FamilyMan

        This.

        Outbreeding may not be all that matters. But it sure would help.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:30 pm Matthew King

        It may be an age thing. Just know that young men are looking to men of your station for guidance (whether they are consciously aware of it or not) and that despair is doubly poisonous from above. If the Silverbacks are freaking out about our chances, then we must truly be doomed indeed.

        If you have fuck-you money, start fuckyouing some of these cunts.

        I take solace in the connections made in fora like these, for what they’re worth. Our presence here reminds me there are others equally convicted, and that “it takes one man with conviction” to forge his own “majority.” We have six-to-ten-times that many who frequent here by my count.

        I am the boy in Reagan’s famous happy-warrior story excited by a roomful of shit: there has to be a pony in there somewhere.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:40 pm FamilyMan

        Matthew I agree. Telling kids about the decline, or even that there is a decline, has little point and could be depressing. I don’t see the value.

        Instead, teach them to have no more respect for women than warranted and to act masculine around them consistently, relentlessly. I am not so sure this is possible in school with all the female teachers and administrators, the most powerful people, and leftwing influences. But they can try and at least work out elements of game.

        From there on, it’s their life to live. They cannot singlehandedly reverse the decline. They may even want to escape it and go somewhere else. But it’s their world, and it and all its women will be waiting for them.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 4:28 am irishsavant

        ” that young men are looking to men of your station for guidance ”

        Well I’ve certainly found that with my own son and his friends, even when they were teens. They were very receptive to taking the red pill. My son is totally awakened as is his wife. I helped them to join the dots and if anything they’re even more outraged than I am by whast’s being done to us.

        But for every one of them there are 10,000 useful idiots hastening their own destruction. But don’t worry, I’m carrying on the fight 24×7.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 4:37 am irishsavant

        And by the way, were just the muds to be our enemy I wouldn’t fear. As you say they – on their own – are easily overcome despite overwhelming numerical superiority. But they are just the shock troops and potential cannon fodder for the superior brains directing the war. YKW in jujitsu-like fashion have turned Whites’ superior characteristics against themselves. To wit, the subject of this post, feminism.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 10:12 am Matthew King

        No doubt. The enemy within, the self-hating traitor, the slothful puppet comprise the real threat. The gook is in the wire.

        So we proceed first by discrimination, then segregation (note the status of these terms as shocking curse words to the modern ear), then reconnection. In the past this process had a physical component — we all had to move next to each other. And all things being equal, having our own state and nation is still the sine qua non.

        But today we can cause effective, de facto separation and create Tocquevillian civil society the way we are doing right now — through instantaneous, thick communication networks. I was recently reading about Sam Adams and the “committees of correspondence,” which were related to the development of the Sons of Liberty, which eventually became local shadow governments prior to the (avoidable) war. That kind of “correspondence” has never been easier to establish today — if also easier to infiltrate, granted.

        The strategic template is there for lovers of liberty and men of testicular fortitude; for Americans the rebellious frame of mind is in our history, in our blood. And the tactical instruments have never been more refined or easier to procure. We merely have to marry the esprit of the founding revolutionaries to the modern weaponry at our fingertips.

        Then we flush the cowards into the open. We are not up against honorable Red Coats. We are confronting beady-eyed rats, supine lupine nocturnal scavengers and skittering skittish parasites. We are performing a work of political sanitation. Maintenance, even. Self-starters and bloody-minded radicals are not needed so much as bourgeois custodians.

        What country ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them.

        What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.

        — T. Jefferson to W.S. Smith from Paris on the eve of its revolution

        I’m telling you, there’s a pony in there somewhere.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:54 pm Carlos Danger

        We let them control us by buying their media and paying them to insult us. Turn off the Electronic Rabbi.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:16 pm Zombie Shane

        > “The only enemy deadly enough to defeat us… any hot skirmish…”

        We need to be working on:

        1) Anti-drone weapons.

        2) Anti-satellite weapons.

        3) Anti-robotics weapons.

        4) Anti-router software.

        5) Anti-server-farm software.

        Etc etc etc.

        Gunpowder and lead alone might not be enough to win this one.

        And we need to keep a wary eye on the biological agents.

        Don’t allow yourself to think for a second that all of these psychopathic elitists will go down without a fight.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:26 pm naz

        haha ever heard of the mongols? genghis khans army got as far as…poland i believe. and contrary to the original sources, no there werent hundreds of thousands of them. in fact the typical mongol army was 20,000 to 40,000 elite badass not afraid to die horse archers, with some auxilaries thrown in. and they would defeat much larger opponents, including 70,000 of the finest knights europe could muster at the battle of the vistula river.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:37 pm Matthew King

        And the exceptions-that-prove-the-rule come out of the woodwork. The Mongol over-extension was a relative blip.

        And if indeed there were only 20,000 elite badasses rather than the horde, you are making my K-selection point for me.

        And I am not saying we didn’t suffer setbacks. I am saying that we are the race of quality over quantity, and that is better than the opposite, and that is why we culturally dominate the planet.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 5:09 pm whiskeysplace

        The Mongols went to Egypt, to present day Iraq, to Turkey, to China, everywhere BUT Western Europe. Now, why was that you ask? 1. Mongol Compound bows fell apart in the rain and it rains ALL THE TIME in Western Europe. 2. Mongol ponies were fast and manuever based, but in Western Europe swamps, hills, forests, MUD EVERYWHERE, mountains, rivers etc. make war of manuever not an empty plain or steppe or desert where armies can go everywhere but a straight out slugfest which Mongols were spectacularly BAD AT.

        Once Mongols penetrated deep into Western Europe their advantages were massively overthrown, bows fell apart and ponies no match for chargers in straight on fights.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 7:50 pm Karl

        Not exactly. The Mongols were MORE than happy to absorb conquered populations, and even retain them in ethnic armed formations within their own Empire. And got they got beyond Poland….. they reached (what is now) Ashdod. No Whites ever did a more efficient job of conquest than the Mongols.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:32 pm Opus

        Actually it was 30,000 that held the Indian sub-continent – according to M.K.Gandhi but even so Indian provinces were in the habit of surrendering to one British officer and his dog – and they still do; did not Kabul surrender to John Simpson (unarmed) – and his BBC film crew? Even so, a higher birth rate than the average corporate cubicle bitch is now managing might not be entirely undesirable, but I am not volunteering my services (except as practice).

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:38 pm Matthew King

        Didn’t check my figures, went by memory, thanks for the correction.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:34 pm thwack

        Mathew King
        That strategy ultimately fails and is one reason why the world speaks English, not Mandarin
        —————————————————————————————————
        The world speaks English because English is a bastard mongrel language that collects and adopts words from all other languages.

        Mandarin, not so much.

        Simply put, English is sucessful because it is the language of diversity. Its inclusivity is its greatest strength.

        Its more strongular than any other.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:51 pm Greg Eliot

        Dumbass… the reason English has such a rich texture is that, when one’s horizons expand, one gleans all sorts of tidbits from hither and yon.

        And this “diversity” you speak of is not the modern day meaning of the term… it’s merely the “diversity” of predominantly Indo-European peoples who would be pretty much indistinguishable from one another (especially to you darkies) unless you heard their accents.

        You know, you keep talking your n166er-babble until you wear out even the most patient and long-suffering, and when they finally just shake their haid and walk away, you claim victory.

        Wake up to yourself, Sambo… it’s truly becoming a tiresome farce.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 7:27 pm bloxlish

        you must be high nig.
        i’m sure reserve currency status in age of materialism, global linkage fueled by petroleum has nothin to do w/ it

        sandeep in india takes your calls in english at 3 AM b/c its the language of diversity qtf

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 7:27 pm thwack

        Greg Eliot

        Wake up to yourself, Sambo… it’s truly becoming a tiresome farce
        ————————————————————————————————

        Yassuh Massuh Ellyett, all dis die-vers-tay sho make me tied too!

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:11 pm Greg Eliot

        In the case of India, it’s more like the language of conquest, rather than diversity… the Subcontinenters learned at an early eon to “go with the flow”, as it were.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 11:50 pm Chantal

        English is the language of trade and trade trumps everything in the end. English can be learned reasonably well in one year, while French takes about three years.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:17 pm Canadian Friend

        The English language is a superior language.

        but It has more to do with being eclectic than diversity.

        At least in French eclectism ( sometimes the English definitions are slightly different ) is taking the best of different things, it is about being very efficient, it is what intelligent people do, it is what Anglo Saxons have done and why they dominate the world not only with their language.

        while embracing diversity is almost the opposite; you take things only because they are different no matter if they have value or not.

        To keep it simple, look at it this way, making a cake the eclectic way means taking the best ingredients no matter where they are from to make the best cake you can, and it usually works damn well.

        while diversity is putting a little of everything in the recipe (so that no one will feel left out ) and hoping the cake will still taste good…that is no way to make a cake, in the end it ruins the cake.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:13 pm thwack

        Matthew King

        . We don’t win by overwhelming them with quantity (“r-selection”) but quality (“K-selection”).
        —————————————————————————————————

        “Sometimes we don’t win at all”– George S. Custer

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:23 pm Greg Eliot

        Yeah, them Injuns really held the line at Little Big Horn and stopped further White aggression from taking over North America…

        It was JUST LIKE Martel and his Franks at Poitiers…
        n’est–ce pas
        ?

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:51 pm thwack

        Greg Eliot

        Yeah, them Injuns really held the line at Little Big Horn
        ——————————————————————————————————-

        Been to a 7-11 or Home Depot parking lot lately?

        White man count egg on face as hatched chicken; no good.

        White man must return land to Indian and forked tongue to serpent or he will go way of white buffalo.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 8:16 am Greg Eliot

        Been to a 7-11 or Home Depot parking lot lately?

        And this has what to do with (feather, not dot) Indians?

        White man must return land to Indian…

        You’ve been watching too many Poltergeist movies, Kemosabe.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 8:44 am thwack

        Greg Eliot

        Been to a 7-11 or Home Depot parking lot lately?

        And this has what to do with (feather, not dot) Indians?
        ———————————————————————————————

        This is the Indian come back from the grave as the prophesy of the Ghost Dance predicted.

        You call him “Mexican”, be he is the Indian; the same one you tried to exterminate and place in concentration camps.

        He is coming back for his land and there is nothing you can do about it white man.

        Not even your forked tongue can save you this time.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 10:26 am Greg Eliot

        How’d that first Ghost Dance work out, Wovoka?

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 3:58 pm John South

        Still time left for round 2, they won’t fare any better.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 4:09 pm thwack

        Greg Eliot

        How’d that first Ghost Dance work out, Wovoka?
        ————————————————————————————————-

        Thats the point Greg, the ghost dance DID work; it just took a little longer

        The so called “Mexicans” and “Latinos” in the parking lots?

        Those are the Indians. The white man thinks if he calls something by a different name, nobody will realize what it is.

        Like I said gringo, your serpent tongue can’t save you this time.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 7:47 pm Greg Eliot

        There you go again… inventing your own definitions.

        And then the gall to speak of forked tongues?

        If yours were any moreso you could bale hay with it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:21 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        Well said.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 9:00 pm Moonshine Meth Express

        Uhh… didn’t the bugs (spice and Persians) win at the battles you cited? Kill ratios don’t matter for bugs. They always have more to hatch while the supplly of lead and powder is limited.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 10:35 am Matthew King

        The swarms ultimately lost. The point was that even when massively outnumbered we put up resistance that nearly matched the enemy’s only strength, which is why we remember and honor those battles where “few stood against many.”

        Our gaudy kill ratio is such an understood fact that modern warfare has adjusted itself around it. Our enemy fights us in our own media to destroy morale, because it is their only chance. Granted, given the decadence of our culture it is a good chance. Which makes the real battle internal.

        The point is to apply the wisdom that led to our unquestionable dominance externally to the saboteurs internally. It is largely a matter of persuasion (seduction) and our will. At no point should brute numbers of imbecilic savages intimidate us in an essentially rhetorical struggle to maintain morale. Because a loss of morale — not an influx of wetbacks or the petty machinations of YKWs — is the only threat to our comprehensive domination.

        Talking up the threat is important — to the point where we identify it in all its fullness. Not underestimating the enemy is likewise vital — to the point where we don’t overestimate them either. We are reaching the stage where rumors of the enemy’s power are beginning to cause good men to throw up their hands in despair before we have “yet begun to fight” (J.P. Jones). Either we police ourselves against this stinkin-thinkin, or we allow it to metastasize into one of few forces that can actually destroy us.

        N.B.: Infighting over superficial low-priority disagreements or distinctions without a difference is another of those forces.

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 3:59 pm John South

        That’s it, if we show up to fight they lose.

        Everyone knows that.

        Thus, every effort is made to prevent us from being able to fight.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:36 am J.M.

        Normally interesting comments but now you argue like a woman and forget facts in favor of sentimentalism: that not too long ago, whites had FAR above replacement birthrates, which are nowhere to be found in the western world nowadays (>4 children per women, +/- 1 due to mortality). Second, whites have only been minority to Chinese and SouthEast Asians, for centuries Europe had far greater populations than Africa, America or even the Middle East (after the 1700’s precisely when Islam stopped being an existential threat for Europe, what a coincidence…).

        Unless us whites start bucking the trend, in noticeable numbers, decline here we go (and no I don’t believe we will go extinct but our cultural/political weight will go down, that’s for sure. And decline includes collapse, civil war or outright invasion Matt)

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:58 am thwack

        What is stopping you from expanding the definition of “white person” in order to have more white people?

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 10:42 am Matthew King

        The TFRs are plummeting all around the third world, in a steeper trajectory even worse than here — and trajectory is key. And you accuse me of ignoring facts for sentimentality?

        Religious whites have always “buck[ed] the trend” of suicide by self-indulgent modernism. So get with the program, you lukewarm spit. Consult Dr. Shane on the proper personal course of action.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:01 pm CaptainObvious

        I am surprised Matt, that you would feature a quote from Jefferson just before the masonic french revolution in which how many innocent catholics were slaughtered?
        How many jacobins dressed in drag as lady liberty shat all over catholic churches?

        All in the name of liberty,fraternity and Equality right?

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 3:51 pm John South

        I can’t wait, my only fear is that I don’t live to see the day.

        LikeLike


      • on February 20, 2014 at 5:26 am alpharomeo

        Giant Eastern armies used hordes of soldiers whipped into frenzy to frighten their enemies into panic. From the Greek Hoplites to the Romans, Westerners developed an anti-terror approach.

        In other words, facing terror tactics from the East, they developed a discipline to counter it. The Hoplites were a disciplined group standing sh9uld to shoulder against the screaming masses of Eastern forces.

        Roman soldiers developed this further. In direct contrast to the screaming hordes of their enemies they learned to ignore the shrieks of their enemies and to stand shoulder-to-should in a line that did not pay any attention to the emotion and sheer number of the forces against them. They dealt directly with only one thing: the part of the enemy forces that was actually coming up against them.

        The numbers of emotion of the forces that were COMING at them was ignored. They stood shoulder to shoulder and killed the disorganized, emotionally charge forces that actually REACHED them.

        When you do that, the overwhelming masses and screams that were such a part of war in the East became irrelevant. No matter how they yell, the only ones who matter are the ones who actually reach your lines. And the ones who actually reach your lines from the screaming masses are disorganized pushovers.

        Flash forward to the famous British Thin Red Line. If they had thought about what those Zulus would DO to them if they lost they WOULD have lost. But their whole approach was to ignore that and:

        “Stay in Formation! Load! Aim! FIRE!”

        I am not impressed that non-whites can get a hundred thousand demonstrators at with a snap of their fingers. It is the same old equation whites have always faced. Non-whites were always infinitely more impressive. And they always lost.

        There is an old adage of Western military strategy: “One native can beat one civilized – white – soldier.” “In a battle between ten savages and ten white soldiers, the outcome is a tossup.”

        “But when there are a hundred disciplined white soldiers, the savages, a thousand or a million, are doomed.”

        http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2008/11/22/no-news-no-jews-just-stay-in-formation-and-load-aim-fire/

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:55 pm Skunk

        I’m not sure where you’re getting this 50/50 male female split from. I don’t think these women are including any sons in their little fantasies. They want to raise little princesses to be just like themselves.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:28 pm TRG

        Selective abortion will be a trend,if it isn`t already(or some other “solutions”)

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:12 pm Zombie Shane

        > “I don’t think these women are including any sons in their little fantasies. They want to raise little princesses to be just like themselves.”

        I was saying above that she treats “Prince Charming” as nothing more than an accoutrement.

        But her fantasy daughter – that poor little fantasy girl doesn’t even amount to an afterthought in any of the pictures.

        An accidentally un-aborted afterthought of an accoutrement.

        It’s fucking bizarre.

        Like a surrealistic nightmare of an anti-reality.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 12:10 am Chantal

        Society does not respect pregnancy anymore,so when you are pregnant you get called things like fat and you are made ashamed. When you stay home to raise a family instead of working and making money, women and MEN make fun of you and say you are unintelligent like so many of the men (boys) here.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 11:42 pm RS

        You have never been pregnant have you? I was treated exceptionally well when I was pregnant. People will stand up and let you have a seat on the train when you’re pregnant and no one ever said, or even hinted, that I was fat.

        Since I have been a stay-at-home mom the only attitude I have ever received has been from working women who feel the need to justify their own abandonment of their children. I have never had a man show the slightest disrespect because I raise my own kids.

        LikeLike


  2. on February 17, 2014 at 10:40 am Backdoor Man

    At least she’s thin, is wearing a modest dress, and has no visible tattoos or piercings. That’s about all you can hope for from an American woman now.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 10:53 am burke

      guessing her dress is a statement on the patriarchy and to match with the models, but you’re right about her weight.

      can you even imagine interacting with her. the sense of humor’s got to be delightful.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 10:57 am burke

        confirmed “the project is so audacious and flat-out funny…”

        yep, flat-out funny

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 11:05 am The Burninator

        Yeah, wth is it with women who think they’re funny and scream it to the world? My experience is that they are universally about as funny as stomach cancer. Ugh.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:25 pm irishsavant

        Bingo! I occasionally look up people I know on FB. Without exception, those who see themselves as having a ‘great sense of humour’ are in fact utterly devoid of same. Sure, they have a collection of jokes they keep repeating, make a lot of ‘funny’ faces and laugh loudly. But as for real wit…………

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:26 pm Greg Eliot

        Texting a bunch of lol’s does not a sense of humour make.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:25 am MadMav

      You are talking about the cute red head in the middle, right?

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:36 am The Sky is Falling!

      Probably in her mid-late 30s. So age-adjusted for wallification, she is an 8/10. Would bang.

      With condom.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 11:41 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        My, my. The standards have fallen.

        Did you actually click on the link and see the other pics?

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:28 pm burke

        some people just like a really gummy humorless smile

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:26 pm Greg Eliot

        Like when one’s horse crosses the finish line first at Hialeah.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:39 pm The Sky is Falling!

        Ah, I just did. She’s more physically unattractive than initially perceived. Still an 8/10 after further adjustment for mental instability. Crazy women are crazy, but also freaks in the bed so it mitigates their unattractiveness.

        Feel free to consult me for future ratings.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:02 pm pulsotic

        The number goes DOWN after adjusting for crazy.
        The number goes DOWN after adjusting for age.
        You’re the reason these entitled brats think guys will bang anything.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 4:42 pm Dan

        You’re kidding, right? Barely a 6.5. She looks like a horrid Jewess on top of it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 1:53 pm Charlie K

        She was born in 1965. Yes, I’ve pissed away about 30 minutes googling her silly ass.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 1:02 pm OralC

      But her teeth!? Theyre huge!

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 4:29 pm Hugh G. Rection

        I’ve seen bigger. On horses.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 8:22 am Zombie Shane

        And on her co-tribalistes.

        Such as Sarah Jessica Parker.

        And Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

        LikeLike


  3. on February 17, 2014 at 10:44 am cryo

    How do you find this shit, CH? Do you just stalk SWPL blogs occasionally or do you have some kind of advanced algorithm for detecting bullshit?

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 10:51 am tteclod

      Like the rest of us, he’s probably got plenty of idiot friends on Facebook – or somebody sent him the link from his idiot friends list.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 10:54 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        Quoted from http://fstoppers.com/an-ode-to-spinsterhood-suzanne-heintzs-life-once-removed-series:

        “Heintz mentioned to me that her documentary about the project, entitled “Playing House”. Part One of the documentary will be released in March 2014. You can watch the trailer here.
        Her Artist’s Statement discusses the expectations placed on the Modern Woman (whether by society, family and friends or, even, herself), Heintz points to “deeply ingrained mixed messages, from both previous and present generations”. When it comes to life, particularly women’s lives, “fulfilled” is the new “perfect”; “the path to fulfillment is not through one thing, it’s through all things; Education, Career, Home, Family, Accomplishment, Enlightenment.” The trouble with this is that “if any one of these things is left out, it’s often perceived that there’s something wrong with your life.””

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:22 pm Carlos Danger

        How’s being a father?

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:24 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        It’s not so badsz sonz lzozozoz as long as u getz me somehtingz nice an dhot for fathersz day zlzlozozoz

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 10:52 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      It’s actually highly-respected art receiving much adulation:

      http://fstoppers.com/an-ode-to-spinsterhood-suzanne-heintzs-life-once-removed-series

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 10:55 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        watch the trailer here!

        buttehstxtetacularz!!!!!

        zlzolzozolzolzolz

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 2:34 pm irishsavant

        Of course it’s receiving much adulation……..from the usual suspects.

        What can be better, a White woman giving up on family and procreation?

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:21 pm Carlos Danger

        It’s a comprehensive and mutually reinforcing mutual-admiration society- the MSM, the controlled opposition, the entertainment and sports complex, the advertising industry, etc.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:19 pm Greg Eliot

        White woman?

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:15 am haunted trilobite

        Wait, you mean those who ensured that Jackson Pollack became the world’s foremost artist are somehow suspicious?

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 8:33 am mike

        I have to disagree. 1950’s Manhattan was the last time Art was interesting -Pollack, Jasper Johns, Raushenberg and Kerouac in writing. It became fucked up later with Warhol and his stupid soup tins. True American heroes who forged their own path

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 11:50 am haunted trilobite

        All right, I bow to your superior knowledge of art. I picked Pollack as an example of modernism – a break away from traditionalism – but I could have possibly picked a better example to illustrate the tripe that is being “created” nowadays. I think it may have been Irish Savant who linked a blog on a previous article about how this modern art became in vogue. It was vigorously promoted by those with money, and traditional painting styles were labelled “kitsch”. There are a few hints for you there. It was a fascinating, historical read. If I can find the link again, I’ll put it up here

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 12:01 pm Greg Eliot

        The Painted Word by Tom Wolfe (if memory serves) did a good job on that subject as well… unless that’s the book you were talking about?

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:11 pm Charlie Dont Surf

        Coming Soon: A photo exhibit of what her 20 cats left behind the couch why she was on the Grand Tour of Crazy.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:06 am Hugh G. Rection

      I think this one is from the comments here.

      LikeLike


  4. on February 17, 2014 at 10:50 am Reservoir Tip

    I want you to place your yourself in the shoes of one of the types who trolls this blog and others like it. I’d say blue-piller, but I don’t really like the term.

    This picture is a great embodiment of how they’d view the very, very simple concept of social proof game.

    Men like Heartiste can try all they want to convince people that, yes, having people around you enjoying your company is good for other social interactions, but they’ll fail so hard and so repeatedly at connecting the dots to actual human interaction that we get retarded women like this, and men with Fuck Me Silly my Little Ponies trying to, not only mock us, but convince us that those are equivalent.

    “LOL look see I have people with me and girls/men still don’t want anything to do with me lol everything CH writes is a lie u misogynists.”

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:20 pm cynthia

      The thing is, if this woman wants to live her life this way, that’s fine. Trying to force it on everyone else as The Way It Should Be for everyone is the fucking problem.

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 8:29 am Zombie Shane

        Which has been the problem with the Pharisees since Day One.

        If they want to turn Judea and Samaria into one giant steaming pile of Frankfurt School Bolshevik Kitschy Post-Modern nihilistic swine manure, then let them have at it.

        But the Pharisees will never be satisfied with merely destroying themselves.

        As long as there is anything good or decent or worthy or honorable in the world, still remaining to be destroyed, they will be unable to rest – their work will be unfinished.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 12:03 pm Greg Eliot

        “You are of your father, the Devil… and the lusts of your father you will do.”

        LikeLike


  5. on February 17, 2014 at 10:52 am little spoon

    How does this wedge work? I feel like I do not want children, but I don’t really understand what children have to offer.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 2:02 pm Matthew

      Constant fear and tribulation, bad smells, spectacular messes, defiance, loud noises at all hours.

      You definitely shouldn’t have any children.

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 2:09 pm FuriousFerret

      They’re supposed to perpetuate the human race or something like that.

      Also, women without children turn into the worst she-beasts imaginable. Without kids they turn into androgynous shims and cry and bitch about this and that.

      My advice is that if you really don’t want ever have kids become a cougar. Don’t go into full on middle aged cunty spinster mode. Dead serious.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 2:24 pm little spoon

        “My advice is that if you really don’t want ever have kids become a cougar. Don’t go into full on middle aged cunty spinster mode. Dead serious.”

        lol. Mother Theresa didn’t have kids.

        [CH: Mother Teresa also tended to the sick and poor as a vocation. Exceptions? Rules? McFly?]

        I think she turned out ok. Oddly enough, when I was a teenager, I wanted to grow up to become a Catholic nun. That didn’t work because I am an agnostic and a sexual person.

        But that sort of sentiment still drives me I think. I am drawn to a life of contemplation. Family life seems antithetical to that. I am very reclusive and I don’t drink alcohol, so it’s not that I want to go to parties and meet alphas or pursue a corporate career. I feel like I’d rather be able to sit at home and read *all the time* instead of having kids.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 12:49 pm Zombie Shane

        > “That didn’t work because I am… a sexual person.”

        You are not “sexual” until a man’s sperm joins with your ova and a living breathing human child emerges from your birth canal nine months later.

        What you are doing right now is NOT sex.

        We don’t really have a word for it in English – “utterly purposeless and nihilistic fornication” – but until the pollen moves from the Anther into the Pistol and the resulting seeded fruit is produced come harvest season, sex has NOT taken place.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:05 pm thwack

        its called jacking off.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 2:28 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

      I am truly curious.

      What do you live for, then?

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 2:34 pm little spoon

        I live for the pursuit of knowledge. Ideally this means not cumulative factual knowledge, but an abstract understanding of the nature of the universe. Ideally, the pursuit of this understanding is what I’d like to invest maximum energy into. Watching a one year old around like a hawk to make sure it doesn’t put dangerous stuff in its mouth every ten seconds is not an appealing use of my mental focus.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:34 pm Canadian Friend

        They are not one year old forever.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 7:55 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        I’d argue with you about the validity of that claim especially when it comes to implementation, but I figure there’s no way to get to definitive conclusion anonymously.

        Does it occur to you that there will plenty of time to do that later on in life too? That window isn’t shutting down, but another one surely is.

        LikeLike


      • on March 6, 2014 at 7:24 am jakoye23

        Absolutely no way that avatar is an actual pic of our little bookworm. Zero chance.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 2:57 pm FamilyMan

      Isn’t it strange, how so many of us could want children and want to offer them all we can, without thinking of what they’ll offer us in return.

      We must be nuts, eh? Go your own way, we don’t understand each other. I tried, but now I see you’re outside of what I can empathize with. I’ve found you interesting, and may again find you interesting, for this reason. But fundamentally we’re just different, and I don’t say that of most women.

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 8:02 am Baby

        Don’t assume all women who are childless by 30 are so by choice. I’m happily married, but we recently found out we can’t have children due to an accident my husband suffered as a child. It’s heartbreaking. We are grieving, almost as though someone died. I try to be compassionate, but I do feel anger toward women who treat such a sacred gift of creating life as an inconvenience to their busy schedules of spinning their wheels while waiting to die 😦

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 7:56 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        As well you should.

        I just don’t understand the utter nihilism and lack of enthusiasm towards victory and life.

        LikeLike


      • on March 6, 2014 at 7:25 am jakoye23

        Yes, yes, but this is the exception rather than the rule. Most women without children who are in their 30’s are quite capable of having babies. They’ve simply made a CHOICE not to.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 10:38 am NoCatlick

        If you “live for the pursuit of knowledge” pursue some about Mother Theresa and find out just how bad a person she was, lording it over her poverty-stricken charges as if they were dogs…..Too funny, this hypocrisy!

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 3:55 pm Gro Haila

      So you have not yet found a real man. I am sorry for you.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 7:35 pm thwack

        I bet she stays up late at night wishin she had a real one.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:18 pm Greg Eliot

        The only thing black and hot keeping her awake at night is her coffee.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:53 pm thwack

        sucks to be her.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 9:45 pm Moonshine Meth Express

        Thwack likes hims wimmenz like he likes himz coffee: ground up and in the freezer!

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 4:46 am thwack

        I like my women wrapped up like presents; adorned with trinkets and brightly painted like the negros in the forest.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 8:42 am Joachim Peiper

        Out here on the perimeter there are no stars. We is stoned, immaculate!

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 4:17 pm thwack

        The monk

        bought,

        LUNCH!

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:06 pm little spoon

        I’m not denying I love love love an alpha dude.

        The man’s not the issue. It’s the kid I’m ambivalent about.

        LikeLike


      • on March 6, 2014 at 7:29 am jakoye23

        Yes, you’re selfish. We get it. Nothing matters except YOUR needs. You are the modern, Western woman and you represent Western civilization’s final whimper.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 4:12 pm bloxequin

      children are meant to abate burgeoning aged female insanity by providing an outlet for positive feminine qualities when the price point of dat azz hits subzero for the alpha dudes that generate them tingles

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 4:28 pm Han Hyo Joo

      Entertainment

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 4:31 pm Hugh G. Rection

      It’s the closest you’ll ever get to owning a person. And if you aren’t too much of a shrew they’re probably the last people left who’ll give you attention when your looks are gone.

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 10:01 am Amy

        It’s not about owning a person. I have no desire to own a person. I’ve never heard a woman express anything like that. And it shouldn’t be about getting attention, either (although for some it definitely is). It’s about wanting to give and sustain life. What else could be more important?

        That said, some people just don’t want it. I give them credit for being open about it. It’s much better than having kids just to appease someone, or society generally.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 12:55 pm thwack

        Amy

        It’s not about owning a person. I have no desire to own a person
        ———————————————————————————————

        Thats funny?

        You sounded taller on the phone?

        LikeLike


      • on March 6, 2014 at 7:33 am jakoye23

        Actually, it’s not better for society when members of a species who are perfectly capable of reproduction *choose* not to reproduce. That door leads to death of the species.

        It’s Western Civilization’s fault that we’ve produced a large number of women (and men) who do not desire to have children. It’s also the fault of Western Civilization that we have lost the shaming mechanism as a society to force such people to have children.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 6:07 pm Theodore Logan

      You’re at 20 percent fertility now, and by 35 you’ll only be at 10. What makes you think you’re capable of birthing kids that aren’t retarded, autistic, or having a miscarriage?

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:33 pm little spoon

        My post was about not having kids, so why would I be concerned with the kind of kid I am capable of having?

        Also, I’m not at 20%. I’m still within the window of peak fertility. The decline only starts after age 31.

        I also don’t see what is so awful with autistic people, especially the way it is diagnosed today. I also have very much liked every person with Down Syndrome I ever met, and I think if I had a kid, I would love a neurotypical one as much as a child with a different kind of mental profile.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:10 pm haunted trilobite

        Why not volunteer at a DS centre, or at the special olympics? It’s a vicarious solution to having the type of kids you might desire. The traditional cultures used to call them “a blessing”. Now there’s a good chance they’ll get vacuumed onto the slag heap if they’re spotted in time on the ultrasound

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 6:33 pm Theodore Logan

        Goddamn, the hamster never sleeps.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 7:29 am thwack

        little spoon

        Also, I’m not at 20%. I’m still within the window of peak fertility. The decline only starts after age 31
        —————————————————————————————————

        what color are you?

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 7:59 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        I wish I could say anything else, but I’d guess white.

        LikeLike


      • on March 6, 2014 at 7:35 am jakoye23

        Haha! You want to have a mentally retarded child as much as you’d like to have a normal child? What a tool! You truly are screwed in the head. Textbook example of what happens to the overly-educated female.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 6:40 pm Greg Eliot

      I feel like I do not want children, but I don’t really understand what children have to offer.

      I wish your parents had felt the same way, you dumb cooze.

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:55 pm Chantal

      Children will change YOU. There is nothing else like them.

      LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 5:10 am irishsavant

      My wife had no great desire for children but once she became a mother it changed her beyond recognition. Her life became 100% motherhood, and she’s still the same now more than 30 years later.

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 8:30 am Zombie Shane

        You’re a lucky man.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 12:52 pm irishsavant

        Without wishing to sound smug, I am. And we’ve been married over 40 years. We’re freaks in today’s world.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 8:00 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        Did you sleep around on her? Did she know? Did she? How were you sure?

        I am a young man looking for answers. I’d like to learn from someone who seems to know what he was doing.

        LikeLike


      • on March 6, 2014 at 7:38 am jakoye23

        You can, of course, never truly know if someone has been completely faithful to you. You have to have faith in your love and your intimate knowledge of that person.

        LikeLike


  6. on February 17, 2014 at 11:03 am The Burninator

    According to her sight, which I slogged through for a moment or two, she does all of this to “show you can be somebody without a Mrs. or PhD attached to your name!”. In other words, she’s failed at life and instead of accepting her own lack of worth, she does the typical leftist/female thing and redefines reality to wash away the ability to perceive her own shortcomings as failures. Essentially her message is that you should be proud of what you’ve made of yourself without actually having made anything of yourself Whatever the hell that means.

    And wow, but does she take herself seriously as some kind of “artist”. Though to be fair, “con” is a type of artist so, well, there is that I guess.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:15 am Customer Service

      The goalposts are set by human biology. Feminism is the art of moving those goalposts, denying their existence or making their own.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 11:36 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        To the end of their own fucking extinction.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 5:01 pm anonYmous

        The aggressor in any conflict determines the language and rules and outcome, pretty much no matter what else. Failure to adopt the rules and language of the enemy is a big mistake. The goalposts are set by whoever is willing to do the most fuked up crap to win.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:51 pm Charlie Dont Surf

        Polonium in the cat food supply.

        LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 8:02 am Baby

      Feminism is the demand that people give you respect merely for possessing a vagina, even if you never do anything useful with it.

      LikeLike


  7. on February 17, 2014 at 11:07 am Andrew S.

    LikeLike


  8. on February 17, 2014 at 11:09 am Anonymous

    Holy Crap! The photo of her in the bathroom brushing her teeth with the male mannequin in the shower! The Cathedral’s spinster medications are working their magic.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:37 am quorasdesignatedasshole

      That mannequin would look really sad if it had the ability to manoeuvre it’s facial muscles.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:49 pm bloxequin

        even inanimate objects hate feminists

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:38 pm Greg Eliot

        Heh, heh… bizarro world Orpheas Effect.

        LikeLike


  9. on February 17, 2014 at 11:17 am Laguna Beach Fogey

    In my younger days I would have felt a bit sorry for her.

    But now I find her pathetic.

    It’s too early for cocktails.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 2:26 pm Charlie Dont Surf

      http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/magazine/26FOB-2DLove-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

      Pathetic needs a comparative scale.

      LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 8:33 am Zombie Shane

      I’d have felt sorry for her if she weren’t a jewess.

      But given that she’s a jewess, I’m all, “Couldn’t have happened to a nicer chick.”

      LikeLike


  10. on February 17, 2014 at 11:27 am newly aloof

    To further what the Burninator said, check out the byline of the chick that wrote the story CH tweeted: http://elitedaily.com/life/culture/the-actual-difference-between-women-who-are-hot-and-who-are-beautiful/

    “Lauren “LMoney” Martin grew up with one goal: to be the first woman engineer. Upon finding out there were women engineers already, she chose to study advertising at Penn State University, which led to an attempt at acting and ended in a career as a comedy writer.”

    Let’s break this down:

    “with one goal in life: to be the first woman engineer” – not to be just an engineer or to explore her inner calling and love for engineering principles.

    “Upon finding out there were women engineers already” – Special Snowflake status instantly vaporized … by other feminist woman of all things.

    “she chose to study advertising ” – Yeah, no women in that field.

    “which lead to an attempt at acting” – Hey, at least she “engineered” an attempt.

    “ended in a career” – see how women instinctively know that anything they “ended</b in" is shit!

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 3:20 pm Glengarry

      The downward spiral isn’t done yet. She’s writing for clicks now.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 7:37 pm thwack

        If so predict she does one with her new black husband next.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 9:12 pm FamilyMan

      Upon discovering she could not avoid flunking the pre-pre-prerequisites for engineering, and damn it she could not blame sexism because a few other women had managed to get though, she decided to make an excuse and switch to something she could do.

      Academic work in advertising.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 11:58 pm Chantal

        So you insult the intelligence of women and then wonder why they become feminists. Mmmm?

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 4:51 am thwack

        or she should have one of herself getting pounded doggy style by a big black man with the mannequin peeking out of the closet.

        is that racist?

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:31 am Tim

        We have a winner

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 8:27 am Greg Eliot

        When you LIKE the race, it’s ain’t racism.” – Jerry Seinfeld

        LikeLike


      • on March 6, 2014 at 7:41 am jakoye23

        No, but it does reveal your personal sexual fantasies.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 8:26 am Greg Eliot

        Actually, we’re insulting their stupidity, toots.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 12:18 pm Knowbody

        No..insulting the intelligence of feminists. Gotta piece it together but it’s quite clear. 3 cheers for female engineers who legit just want to engineer things. I know many and granted it’s a masculine role generally but they don’t shriek about how they’re special because their an engineer who is female

        LikeLike


  11. on February 17, 2014 at 11:34 am The Burninator

    A look at the Discus comments, none of which are complimentary to her. This one in particular was a gem:

    “She needs to take up vaginal knitting and vomit painting. Then her trifecta transformation into Crazy Single White American Woman will be utterly complete.

    Why can’t men commit? LOL!”

    And then an insightful observation framed from a previous statement of another commentor:

    “1: She’s mocking the Good Housewife of the 50s.. but inside I think she yearns for that lifestyle, instead of ending up dead in a room full of hungry cats.

    2: she pretty much says as much, with her stated desire to open people’s minds to think of lives like hers as successful, too.

    if she wasn’t crying on the inside for society to love her, she wouldn’t care that no one thinks her dry dead-end existence and humorless rictus are to be envied.”

    Gold.

    Did any of these belong to anybody here, heh?

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 12:13 pm corvinus

      Did any of these belong to anybody here, heh?

      (innocent face) What? No way!

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 5:07 pm anonYmous

      The tragedy of this century is nothing more then our most reproductively sound women going to college and not staying home, getting married and staying pregnant. Keep her pregnant and nursing until she is 25 and make her homeschool. The problem is school is seductive, women naturally do good at schoolwork, and the schoolwork is designed for women to do well, and keep them in school. Is it any coincidence the school year is 9months, same with pregnancy.

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 9:42 am The Burninator

        I was with you until this.

        ” Is it any coincidence the school year is 9months, same with pregnancy.”

        Yes, in fact, that is sheer coincidence. The school year has always been traditionally modeled around the summer time due to agriculture. During prime growing season you’d want your young boys out helping you in the field and the lady folk at home tending to everything else as you brought in the crop to keep them all alive over the winter.

        LikeLike


  12. on February 17, 2014 at 11:34 am The Sky is Falling!

    All this talk about the rise of feminism and more women on the carousel driving women craaaay is depressing, but it’s not all bad news folks.

    Never before has it been a better time to be a cad.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:38 am quorasdesignatedasshole

      Being a cad has it’s ups, but it really can’t be good for the society.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:10 pm Zombie Shane

        No, it’s disastrous for society.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:50 pm Matthew King

        It can be salutary, even constructive for society.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 2:07 pm Matthew

        When honorable but naive whites in a diverse society try to use honesty boxes to sell their garden produce in roadside stands, it behooves honorable but shrewd whites to vandalize the honesty boxes as a proof of concept.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 4:35 pm Zombie Shane

        ???

        C’mon, man, that’s the way Jews behave.

        We’re better than that.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 11:23 pm Matthew

        Respect the fence-sitters, Zombie Shane.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 6:08 am The Burninator

        Those are called “honesty boxes”? Neat. First time I saw them was way, way up north in Michigan a few years back.

        I felt quite complimented actually that random strangers trusted me to do the right thing (seriously, they actually reminded me that there is hope for the world). Purchased some items from a couple of them, paid the required amount, felt damned good about life.

        It’s probably not worth noting, but far far northern Michigan doesn’t seem to have any…um…diversity. Wonder if there’s a correlation between that and the rather numerous “honesty boxes” I saw? I can’t recall seeing any such “honesty boxes” outside of Cleveland or Detroit.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 2:07 pm Matthew

        Whoremesis.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 9:58 pm Mike

        Cadding is only good for society if you’re an otherwise would be decent guy who is coerced into the lifestyle of being a player by the fact that most of the women nowadays are so corrupt that it’s either play them or be played by them. In that way it could have a corrective effect because giving these kind of women what they want and letting this shit carry on without protest is the worst possible thing for society.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 10:19 pm Mike

        But the reality is that most men in America are just as depraved as the women so I doubt that there’s anything more than societal decline going on on either end.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:48 pm Matthew King

        “Being a cad” is what happens when “the society” fails to provide a productive outlet for the energies of unabashed men. You have the causation backwards.

        The NFL and Call of Duty can only do so much to vicariously abate the manly urges, which do not relent out of cultural pressure, much less cunty little feminist legalisms.

        Game is invaluable because it is the first practical instance of reasserting discipline over manly nature while concomitantly allowing release from the hundred-year pressure valve. It gentles a man’s condition — in the old sense (“This day shall gentle his condition” from the St. Crispin’s Day speech). It ennobles low instincts, which power deliberate acts of the will away from accidental burnout/self-destruction.

        In other words, practitioners of game are the true gentlemen of our era.

        The goal now must be conscious self-discipline as something worthy (something practical) to strive for, rather than as a means to achieve a couple instantly-disappearing moments of pleasure denied them in their former lives. Once men rediscover and contain the nuclear fusion they possess — no less a power than a teenaged girl inherits, unearned, to attract any man on the planet — they will be able to harness it into a perpetual power plant rather than just going off like a bomb, one-and-done.

        PUAs should be on to phase two by now, organizing men into squads and mowing down entire barrooms full of women, on general principle and with extreme prejudice, slaughtering slot until sluts rediscover the utility of modesty perforce. They should be thinking like warriors rather than thieves. What young man would refuse recruitment to the front lines in this war between the sexes, this honor plus eros, where fucking is the fighting, and where bitches ache to surrender in droves?

        Matt

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:25 pm JB

        Used to be that young men didn’t wait around for society to provide stuff, including an outlet for their energies.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:52 pm Matthew King

        Used to be there weren’t virtual realities and handheld gizmos and cultish pastimes and a million divertissements either. Just because distractions are currently siphoning off the surface of youthful initiative, it doesn’t mean there aren’t deep wells of energy there for the tapping. Whether this vast reserve of power is squandered, diverted, mismanaged, or channeled to productive ends is up to the graybeards in leadership to provide or fail to provide.

        Young men don’t “provide” the way, they provide the energy. The men who survive youth are the ones who organize and direct the next generation’s disparate, unbound, and chaotic resources. They are wise enough to provide order, leadership, and efficiency. That’s you. So get to work.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 2:20 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

        I would.

        Trouble is – Who am I for?

        Which gang is mine? I was never a part of a manly one. I learned not to take by force, but through conniving.

        The greybeards in my family/society already failed to instill an us vs them in me. In fact, they were the fucking losers. They allowed their women all this power over me, you and every fucking one of us just for a few votes and approval.

        I speak as a young man – I have nothing to lose. I might create an us entirely by myself… but those would be my brother and my own kids/friends/brother’s kids. That’s it.

        Those milquetoast SWPLs with liberal arts degrees in wymyn studies just don’t cut it. They can squander their worthless seed into the abyss of extinction. I won’t.

        I don’t have a gang today. Not a big one, at least. But I will. It may take time. But I will take what I want. Anyone who tries to stop me – white milquetoast or black – will be destroyed. Not because I will kill him. But because he is killing himself already, and I don’t even need to.

        But I assure you – for every 25 year old man who has a will like mine there are 1000 others who are crying their pansy hearts out for some fat short haired slut who gobbled up some good looking douche’s cum by the gallons behind their backs.

        Those wretched excuses for manhood deserve death, and nothing better. Why, they are products of poor seed in the first place, the way I see it.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 4:03 pm Matthew King

        That you found your way here despite your family’s “fucking loser” background is proof of concept: there is an irreducible soul in a man that cannot be touched by the enemies of nature. He just requires a mentor to remind him of his essential manhood.

        We are the transition generation: we won’t see the promised land. We have to leapfrog back and seek mentors from the past so that we can be models for our sons fast arriving to take up the cause. Their sons will anchor the last relay to victory. Our job is to make the task easier for them.

        It is an honor to be the link between our ancestors and our progeny, especially because the haters of life present in this age are so hellbent on severing the “mystic chords of memory.”

        Who are you for? You are for your seed. You are for your kind. Yours is not just to produce the next generation but to bequeath them a place where they can flourish, where they can ally with people like them and extend the line in perpetuity. They will be have to be made into men, a dangerous pursuit in this era of estrogen, but what of danger? Danger reminds you that you are alive. And our enemies are cowards who skulk in the dark. Take your light out from under the bushel basket and they shrivel into dust.

        You are for your brothers who are more numerous than you (are allowed to) think. Talk openly enough to find them where you live. The power of the “n-word” cuts both ways: when I say it, a flag goes up, the bitches bitch, the SWPL wrinkle their noses and threaten with hot air (and a whiff of arugula). But the stouthearted rally. We are blessed to have such a powerful, identifying code word.

        Stay frosty, brother.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 9:48 pm FamilyMan

        Thwack, how do you like it that Matt King describes “niggers” as the common enemy against whom white men of spirit can rally together?

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 7:26 am thwack

        Mathew King
        The power of the “n-word” cuts both ways: when I say it, a flag goes up, the bitches bitch, the SWPL wrinkle their noses and threaten with hot air (and a whiff of arugula). But the stouthearted rally. We are blessed to have such a powerful, identifying code word.
        —————————————————————————————————–

        But you cannot win because you lack the skin.

        You ain’t no real ni66a, you just a derivative; you derive all your value from the performance of another underlying, tangible, real, entity. Stop trying to cheat an honest man.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 1:05 pm thwack

        FamilyMan

        Thwack, how do you like it that Matt King describes “niggers” as the common enemy against whom white men of spirit can rally together?
        —————————————————————————————————

        I think he is intentionally setting the bar low so as to rally the troops. The white mans greatest enemy is actually himself in the form of his own alienation and fear of rejection.

        I really can’t help ya’ll with that.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 2:08 pm Matthew

        Used to be men were not penalized for productive use of their energies.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:41 pm Random Guy

        I didn’t read his post as saying that cads cause fucked-up society, just that an abundance of them is bad for it (in other ways…)

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:36 pm The Sky is Falling!

        Not at all.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:42 am The Burninator

      You’re right to an extent Sky, but the problem is that it’s like finding a bright side to being on a sinking ship. Sure, you’re all going to die most likely, but at least nobody is at the buffet (since they’re running for the lifeboats) and you can have all the free food you want!

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:34 pm The Sky is Falling!

        You’re right to an extent Burn, but the problem is that expecting anything else is expecting human nature to be something it is not. The ship’s sinking, cool. No one’s going to sacrifice their sexual satisfaction to plug up the holes. The mindset of cads (particularly those with dark triad personality traits – which is most cads): better to drown on a full stomach than an empty one.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:44 pm The Burninator

        It’s not a zero sum game. Not either or.

        Instead of consigning oneself to drowning, grab the food and hit a lifeboat or grab a lifejacket. Get the best of both worlds.

        In this case, bed as many women as you can AND in doing so help them come to terms with the experience of their own suppressed shame for being such a slut.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:46 pm The Sky is Falling!

        “In this case, bed as many women as you can AND in doing so help them come to terms with the experience of their own suppressed shame for being such a slut.”

        Are you kidding? You think THAT will stop the hamster from spinning?

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:52 pm The Burninator

        Nothing stops it from spinning. The idea is how to use it to your advantage.

        Life isn’t all about nihilism, you can create order out of chaos. Use their tools against themselves, which is in fact usually referred to as “making her hamster spin”. Let it spin and spin and spin, and when enough of their collective mind herd start talking they’ll either figure out that they need to stop giving it away so easily, or, well, Western civ is over. If there’s a chance to salvage West Civ, I for one would rather at least try to do so than to consign my fate to burning buildings and wondering hordes of orcs from the inner city roaming the land.

        To be honest I really do not and have not understood at a deep psychological level the impulse to deconstruct everything in life without even a vague inkling that perhaps we should plan on building something to place in its stead. Nihilism as a singularity of philosophy is illogical.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:59 am Laguna Beach Fogey

      Word.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:11 pm Zombie Shane

        Word^2.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 9:53 pm Moonshine Meth Express

      No better time to be a cat you mean?

      LikeLike


  13. on February 17, 2014 at 11:41 am Anonymous

    I married a South American. I enjoy my home cooked meals and nightly kiss on the cheek. And my boys are well-adjusted, soon-to-be men.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 7:39 pm thwack

      what color are they?

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:08 pm Greg Eliot

        Same as us.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:18 pm thwack

        slow is not a color.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:27 pm Greg Eliot

        Ai.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 9:53 pm FamilyMan

        Only on the average, it is.

        LikeLike


  14. on February 17, 2014 at 11:42 am Bob Wallace

    I wonder how many meds she’s on? Three? Four? The women I’ve talked to, who will admit it, average a cocktail of four meds a day.

    LikeLike


  15. on February 17, 2014 at 11:55 am Reservoir Tip

    How does one pull a lesbian?

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 12:00 pm ain't nuttin but a gansta partayyy

      if she’s fat, behind a truck.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:06 pm Reservoir Tip

        It’s the Latvian girl from the last thread.

        ZombieShane, she’s older than 18 no worries.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:13 pm Zombie Shane

        LOL’ed.

        Just make several copies of that video/audio tape.

        One for the arresting police officer, one for the D.A., one for your lawyer, one for your fraternity brothers, etc etc etc.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:18 pm Reservoir Tip

        Haha now she’s telling me she “doesnt see gender (sex)”

        She texted me three times and called twice in the timespan of me taking my morning shit to invite me to the park.

        Yet she says she wants to be friends. Which CH Maxim says to judge a girl based on her actions and not her words? I think this may be a classic situation.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 1:03 pm Matthew King

        Proceed from the truth that no woman is born a lesbian but rather is abused (sexually, physically, ideologically, gastronomically) into one.

        Haha now she’s telling me she “doesnt see gender (sex)”

        Be sure to revisit this issue when you are balls-deep and pounding the breath of life out of her. Taunt her, make her recant it in the gasps you permit to escape from under choking hands. You don’t argue with women, you demonstrate truth to them, on them, in them. The revolution will be won in the trenches (between a girl’s legs).

        Everyone, all around, prefers this method, even if they are LUGs playing bisexual during the day to appease their campus ethos and to get an A from Professor Dyke. You will be doing the Lord’s work.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:22 pm FamilyMan

        The Indian chick would be helpful, as well as fun on her own. Does the Latvian know how to contact her?

        Other than that, she’s a butch (she was playing alpha male) so I think it’d be hard. If she were femme, you could offer the upgrade to a real cock. But I think the reason things were “off” is that you’re dealing with a psychological male.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:48 pm Reservoir Tip

        No way for either of us to get in contact with her. Should have just taken that B to the bathroom.

        Your point on her being butch makes sense though. Turns out she isn’t a lesbian or anything, and her overall attitude was pretty feminine, but other aspects of her are masculine. The individuality, traveling free spirit thing.

        It’s odd though. She says she really only wants to be buds but she was practically begging me to come over today, telling me how interesting and funny she thought I was and blah blah.

        “I really want to see you today”

        Perhaps this isn’t the friend zone so much as it is the alpha proving grounds.

        I’ve picked her brain a bit, and when I bring out the right wing assholery she gets hot. I can tell. She said she dug that I had backbone.

        So I go for round two sometime this week, turn up the alpha and I think I’ll be cool.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 4:14 pm FamilyMan

        OK, glad to be wrong on that, have fun.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 12:06 pm whorefinder

        Pure win.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 1:50 pm unkempt

      there is no such thing as a lesbian. girls are just sexual and sometimes they mess around. its what they do.

      now, there are some females, hairy and overly muscular or otherwise obviously exposed to too much testosterone in the womb, that can be legitimately defined as lesbian. if you accept the contentious idea that they’re actually female.

      as to ‘doesnt believe in gender’ that hamster is running wild. it means ‘ive already given up loving women exclusively’ so feel free to attach ‘because I want your dick’

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:00 am thwack

        thats right.

        Or my favorite, you go to an anti racism seminar, and a white girl walks up to you andssays, “hi, my name is _____ and Im a lesbian currently exploring aspects of my bisexuality”.

        that means you good tonight.

        LikeLike


  16. on February 17, 2014 at 11:55 am The Other Jim

    If that site is representative of what the SWPL-Eloi class and their artistic tastes have degenerated into, please Lord, let the Barbarians take over.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 4:29 pm Zombie Shane

      This.

      LikeLike


    • on February 19, 2014 at 8:02 am quorasdesignatedasshole

      The odds of that happening are low in a nuclear power wielding democracy that is trying very hard to ban access to the guns for civilians.

      LikeLike


  17. on February 17, 2014 at 11:58 am Gro Haila

    Meanhile three (3!) baffling situations to the hamster-ignorant.

    LikeLike


  18. on February 17, 2014 at 12:05 pm whorefinder

    Paging senor Thwack masta p! We found your old, used up, fat white whore sugar momma! Perfect for your subhuman ass!

    Rape!

    LikeLike


  19. on February 17, 2014 at 12:05 pm Tim

    Feminism just jumped the sh- hamster.

    LikeLike


  20. on February 17, 2014 at 12:06 pm ho

    >Suzanne Heintz

    Oy vey! /pol/ was right again!

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 2:13 pm Rick250

      yep.
      a. look at me. look at me!
      b. laugh at my ‘hilarious’ feel-good self-acceptance humor..this time about spinsterhood.
      c. buy my art (to support feminism and the art community of course)$$$

      LikeLike


  21. on February 17, 2014 at 12:12 pm Ras Al Ghul

    I’m starting to think the Joker started out as a woman, the smile on the woman’s face is a perfect match for his madness.

    And speaking of cray cray watch the video posted here:

    http://rexpatriarch.blogspot.com/2014/02/this-is-why-i-hide-in-my-basement.html

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 11:01 pm Ted

      i’ve often thought ‘dark knight”s joker embodied many of the worse elements of a woman. i think chris nolan gave a hint during the harvey dent/joker scene in the hospital.

      LikeLike


  22. on February 17, 2014 at 12:26 pm Diogenes the Cynic

    “Let it fall on Locksley Hall, with rain or hail, or fire or snow;
    For the mighty wind arises, roaring seaward, and I go.”

    Locksley Hall
    Tennyson

    LikeLike


  23. on February 17, 2014 at 12:33 pm Uncle Elmer

    Feminist fixation on “the 50’s” is creepy and disturbing.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 1:24 pm The Burninator

      It’s not really their fixation any longer, it was the fixation of their 1960’s Brood Sisters. Since feminism has long lacked any intellectual underpinnings, or at best has long kept them under wraps, the modern feminists have nothing new to contribute except rail against a world that hasn’t existed since their grandmother’s were young women. They have no experience with this time period, and talk only in the most glaring chiches about times with which they have no familiarity.

      It’s what they keep teaching themselves, so it’s what they keep regurgitating, lacking any originality or intellectual rigor to come up with new “patriarchy” to uphold as evil.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 2:44 pm Uncle Elmer

        The stock photography of that era must evoke a golden age where happy women were kept as pampered playmates for pipe-wielding alpha men.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 5:09 pm Carlos Danger

        Women were pretty happy when I was a kid. I think much happier than today.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 11:32 pm cynthia

        I’ve never understood it, either.

        But there’s definitely an obsession with some kind of nightmare, dystopian, “fixed point” in the past, where all women were oppressed, homosexuals had their heads lobbed off by angry mobs, and black children couldn’t go to the store without getting raped. Unfortunately, the Right tends to idealize this same fixed point in time as a magical world where all children were safe, all women were thin and happy, and there were no debates about alternate sexualities.

        Yet, it’s all bullshit. Children were still molested in 1950. Women were still fat. Homosexuality was still largely ignored by the general populace. Black kids had a better than 50-50 chance of being born, and better than the current 30-70 odds of knowing their fathers.

        The 1950s is quickly becoming a fantasy land that we can project our own desires and hatreds against, that can be defined in any way the commentator wishes. The truth is far more complex, and thus, inconvenient.

        This woman’s not referring to the 1950s. She’s referring to an imaginary world that feminist claim to hate, yet seem to be the only ones still propagating through the cultural consciousness. It’s weird.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 7:35 pm Canadian Friend

        Women were not fat in the 1950s.

        There wwere a lot less fat people back then, even among blacks.

        Obesity only became an epidemic much later.

        LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 7:27 pm Canadian Friend

      The 1950s is the last decade in which women were having an easy life.

      Feminism made life harder for women.

      Everybody knows that today’s women are much less satisfied with their lives than women in the 1950s were.

      Which is why most of today’s career women eventually quit everything to become stay at home mothers married to a nice provider – exactly like things were in the 1950s.

      Women may lift their nose on the 1950s but actually they wish they were living that life.

      LikeLike


  24. on February 17, 2014 at 12:50 pm Reservoir Tip

    http://yahoo.match.com/y/article.aspx?articleid=12465&TrackingID=526103&BannerID=844038

    Beta males are wearing women out.”

    LikeLike


  25. on February 17, 2014 at 12:50 pm thrust

    http://www.pof.com/viewprofile.aspx?profile_id=62805675

    Billy Squire was right. Everybody wants you~!

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 1:36 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

      “Profession: photorapher”

      Not a typo. You raphed my eyes with those photos, alright. When your corpulent body covers 90% of the shot, there’s no need to blow up your picture for a better look. Absolutely disgusting.

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 2:35 pm Reservoir Tip

      She’s certainly a fishing lady.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 7:01 pm Greg Eliot

        And so eloquent too!

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 12:44 am Shallow Hal

        Where the hell is Tony Robbins?? I need to be hypnotized again

        LikeLike


  26. on February 17, 2014 at 12:53 pm God damn

    Well what do u know? YKW

    Lolzlolzlololzlolozlolzoz

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 2:13 pm Matthew

      I don’t even bother checking any more.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 4:19 pm Zombie Shane

        Bingo.

        LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 4:02 am ho

      It’s like another shoah!

      LikeLike


  27. on February 17, 2014 at 12:57 pm Mob Barley

    If your strong moves are 2-7 off suit, like me, you’re in luck. I love those cards.

    LikeLike


  28. on February 17, 2014 at 1:15 pm God damn

    Diversity is….

    A COMPLETE DRAIN ON PRODUCTIVE MEMBERS OF SOCIETY.

    WHO PSYS GOR THE MEDS? We pay for this animal’s food and mess and this is the result.
    http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/02/17/3935738/call-for-help-in-miami-spirals.html

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 1:33 pm ballsweatsoop

      i just had a weird thought reading that. I’m going to assume the police reports are more accurate. Do you think the subjects now even remember what really happened, or are they now working under the delusion of what they’ve claimed happened.

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 3:02 pm irishsavant

      “She blames police for allowing the situation at her home to escalate.”

      Of course she does.

      “He din do nuffins. He was turnin’ his life around, aspiring rapper, noamsane?”

      The dysgenics I referred to earlier.

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 3:06 pm irishsavant

      And did you notice this gem?

      “Wilcox spent more than a week at Jackson Memorial Hospital’s crisis center, and his brother Clinton Coleman, 19, and sisters Chanel Lightfoot, 23, and Shantell Garland, 22”

      Four ‘siblings’ all with different surnames!

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 3:15 pm FamilyMan

      If it’s just one family member going nuts, you cuff them and haul them off to cool down. Surely the cops could have done that right. The charges to other family members mean the whole family was getting into it.

      LikeLike


  29. on February 17, 2014 at 1:20 pm tang3zang

    She’ll progress right on into a houseful of cats, if not already.

    “Heintz rejects the notion that to be a successful woman means that you have to fulfill a laundry list of achievements, not limited to an education, career, home, family, accomplishment, and enlightenment.”

    That’s it right there. Don’t have standards so nobody can judge you. Everyone’s a winner!

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 1:45 pm Anonymous

      No adhering to standards set by society? She rejects that a woman needs a laundry list of achievements? How about rejecting a laundry list for what is required in a man? NO, she would rather die before considering a relationship with a beta. Alone is OK, beta husband is worse then death. A cad mannequin is better then a real life beta is the message I’m reading in her “art”. LOL

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 2:45 pm Holden Caulfield

        “cad mannequin is better then a real life beta”

        +1

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:07 pm Carlos Danger

        Don’t worry. You’re better off single and alone than with a crazy bitch like this.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 3:25 pm Cad Mannequin

        You know it.

        LikeLike


  30. on February 17, 2014 at 1:32 pm Oswald Spengler

    Bring the purifying flames.

    The sooner the better.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 1:38 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

      Spitroast, anyone?

      LikeLike


  31. on February 17, 2014 at 1:42 pm Greg Eliot

    Typical Jewess mocking erstwhile “middle America” with her Ethel Merman/Bette Midler/Seabiscuit exaggerated smile happy face…

    And (of course) provided with an MSM stage for her kitsch, courtesy of her tribal coterie.

    Meh… next.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 4:17 pm Zombie Shane

      Shhh…

      Her infertility helps our cause.

      Shh…

      The first rule of Fight Club…

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:02 pm Gro Haila

        Why else would be bindis up on the test stand?

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 8:44 pm santa666

      The Kosher just ooozes off the screen. Surprised it took this long for anyone to notice.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 10:44 pm corvinus

        Should’ve guessed from the big mouth. My bad.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:21 am irishsavant

        Yeah, I missed that as well. and I usually have impeccable nostrils when it comes to sniffing out YKWs.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 1:59 pm Charlie K

        She claims to have been raised in the Mormon Church. Parents were blue-collar types; her mother lives in Salt Lake City. The rot is well advanced among the goyim.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 3:51 pm Greg Eliot

        If she’s a shiksa then I’m U Thant.

        LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 4:47 am Anonymous

      If she really wanted to comment on CURRENT social expectations of normalcy shouldn’t the mannequin be a short-haired butch and the children be various adopted shades of third world?

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 8:22 am Greg Eliot

        Exactly… trying to poke fun at Ozzie and Harriet America at this late stage is… well, like trying to club a dodo.

        Makes this “art” of hers all the more inane…

        But then again, when the YKWs get their nose out of joint on a given issue, they never let it go. Witness, for example, the movies STILL being made which reference the McCarthy Era and blacklisting.

        LikeLike


  32. on February 17, 2014 at 1:45 pm bloxequin

    the one where she cries into a bowl of microwaved macaroni in a dimly lit studio apt while watching Sleepless in Seattle was epic

    oh wait

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 6:43 pm Greg Eliot

      I liked better the one where she and her friends did pot luck on Eat, Pray, Love night.

      LikeLike


  33. on February 17, 2014 at 1:45 pm Lurking Gorilla

    Sad. The big fake smile reflects serious damage beneath.

    Speaking of photos, I have a question for the Chateau, because this is one of the few places I’ll get an answer rooted in reality: is it a good idea to keep photos on social media of you and girls you’ve been with in the past? As long as the photos aren’t too lovely dovey, do you think current prospects would be put off (hindbrain-wise) by the photos or would it work nicely as preselection/jealousy evokers?

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 2:16 pm Matthew

      The big, fake smile reflects serious misheritage beneath.

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 6:45 pm Greg Eliot

      It’s the usual suspect mocking of Ozzie & Harriet-era America… their tribe’s contention that a happy homemaker must ipso facto be some sort of vapid Stepford Wife.

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 4:12 am ho

        “their tribe’s contention that a happy homemaker must ipso facto be some sort of vapid Stepford Wife.”

        Bingo.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 7:50 am irishsavant

        Unless you’re one of the tribe in which case you’re encouraged to breed lots of little KNWs.

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 7:03 pm Theodore Logan

      Go with the preselection. Don’t fall for their indignation of past conquests, it’s just another shit test.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:06 pm Lurking Gorilla

        I think that’s spot on. Still, I’d imagine it’s a good idea to show *some* decorum and not smear it in their faces. I have a friend (model-like looks, alpha, but not smooth) who has photos of him and his ridiculously hot ex gf slurping each other’s faces off. That’s gotta be too much. I’m thinking a little subtlety would go a long way. Any thoughts?

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:50 pm Theodore Logan

        Fuck decorum. The more it is in their face, the faster their preselection hamster spins. If the pics are only of you side by side with past flings only smiling completely non risque posturing, you would look like only an orbiter than a guy with options.

        LikeLike


  34. on February 17, 2014 at 2:01 pm LA Dude

    Related: have seen on Facebook many childless women (“girls”?) in their 30s completely anthropomorphize their dogs, to the point that they throw the dogs birthday parties with party hats and cupcakes, dress them in sweaters, and address the dogs as if they were human (e.g. “my angel,” “my precious cutie pie,” etc.). Must be seen to be believed. Is this what the Freudians would call “displacement”? Not sure which is more disturbing: the behavior or the utter lack of self-awareness.

    LikeLike


  35. on February 17, 2014 at 2:03 pm Lo

    Did anybody else notice even the mannequin looked miserable in this pic?

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 2:43 pm Holden Caulfield

      The funny part to me is that she’s so unwilling to leave Delusion World that she got a fucking mannequin family. Pure refusal to do any kind of honest self-assessment.

      CH was right: Pumping and dumping is a valuable public service. Hats off to all the men that ran miles of dick through this worthless chick. I bet that mannequin hears all sorts of inane commentary on her shitty life…

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 3:05 pm steve

      The mannequin does look quite aloof and uninterested in all of the pics….doesn’t he…

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 3:11 pm FamilyMan

      It’s interesting how a facial expression that’s suitable in one setting looks way out of place or shocking in another. I think the mannequin’s facial expression is fixed. Making one with a movable but believable face would be very hard.

      LikeLike


  36. on February 17, 2014 at 2:20 pm Full-Fledged Fiasco

    ‘Will You Ma…’: Boyfriend’s Alleged Newspaper Ad for His Girlfriend Takes Hilarious Twist.

    LikeLike


  37. on February 17, 2014 at 2:21 pm Ronin

    She can kid around all she wants, but I’m going long both IAMS and PetSmart as we speak.

    Value-Investing at its finest.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 4:14 pm Zombie Shane

      In the trendy upscale Blue State grocery stores, the baby-food “aisle” [usually just a few feet of shelf space] is simply DWARFED by the pet-food aisle.

      LikeLike


  38. on February 17, 2014 at 2:22 pm Anonymous

    Take a few minutes to review your ex girlfriends and notice how many of them have emerged as wasted spinsters or freaks. They never recover from an Alpha. Promiscuity also induces borderline disorder. If you are a “game” student, you know that this is the case, but are too much of a narcissistic psychopath to notice. The Victorian metaphor for the cad, the soulless vampire, reflects the soul theft involved in being a “ladykiller.”

    An incomparable and sublime sensual beauty from an elite Ivy asked me out. She was a friend and I adored her, but I knew that I would never marry her. And, that’s what she was after. What of her now? happily married to another man-much better off than my ex’s. Crushed by my outright rejection, she found it easier to do the big settle. I went out with another girl instead and eventually married her. It all turned out for the best.

    There is nothing worse for your game than to realize the benefits to the woman and yourself from holstering your weapon.

    LikeLike


  39. on February 17, 2014 at 2:36 pm Reservoir Tip

    Speaking on mannequins…

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Mannequin-Equality-Association-MEA/101973402029?ref=br_tf

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 3:03 pm Reservoir Tip

      of*

      LikeLike


  40. on February 17, 2014 at 2:53 pm Scray

    I started some boxing/MMA stuff about a month ago, and I’d just want to recommend it to anyone interested in building a lifestyle that aids your game. I definitely feel like I’m starting to develop a keen edge.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 6:43 pm thwack

      How is your palm strike?

      It takes a while to get used to but its definately worth it.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:57 pm Greg Eliot

        Doesn’t the hairiness cushion the blow?

        (let’s see how many get that reference… lzozozlzlzozozlzlzozozll)

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 8:13 pm Greg Eliot

        The tough part was getting the hands to heal… after the referee kept stepping on them.

        LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 9:55 pm whorefinder

        How is your palm strike?
        —–Much better in lower primates like you.

        Rape!

        LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 7:09 pm Hunter

      Awesome dude!

      LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 5:31 pm haunted trilobite

      I was in the red light one evening trying to find an establishment with a TV to watch the game on, so I walk into this bar with a screen, but all they’re showing is UFC. So as I briefly pause to take in the StPierre “tap out” I notice the crowd seems really enthusiastic cheering and I look around and it’s all these skinheads. And there was something off about it, as it seemed exaggerated. Then the penny drops that they’re all a bit behind on the rent. Sure enough, I see the rainbow drapes on the way out. As I filled the rest of the evening with window-shopping etc, I couldn’t shake the disgust of these nu-wave tuff queers getting their violent thrills by watching heavily tatooed naked men slathering all over each other. I prefer my beer cold, my TV loud and my homosexuals flaming.

      LikeLike


  41. on February 17, 2014 at 3:00 pm FamilyMan

    Sorry CH I don’t care. I hardly ever care what spinsters do. They’re off the radar. Of course they’ll do some pathetic things. That’s all they can do. Too late for them, but I don’t need to bother them or hurt their feelings. The world is full of life, why dwell in impending death?

    Amusing though. If it makes her feel better, what’s the harm? And it’s some business for the mannequin maker.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 3:40 pm God damn

      Boomer , she is illustrative of The ENTIRE PROBLEM that Gen X women were aggressively taught to hate men and family!!!!! One of the main ideas of this blog. Feminism destroyed the family and is destroying civilization.

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 4:11 pm Zombie Shane

      > “Of course they’ll do some pathetic things.”

      Like vote in droves for the Clintons and the Obamas.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 4:18 pm FamilyMan

        Obama was not actually reelected. Yes it makes the country sucky, it’s like fighting a rearguard action to keep any sanity here.

        LikeLike


  42. on February 17, 2014 at 3:04 pm Marky Mark

    Funny how the male mannequin she chose is way better looking than her… guy like that in real life wouldn’t even give her a second glance.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 4:09 pm Zombie Shane

      That’s part and parcel of the greater delusion.

      LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 6:48 pm thwack

      where is the photo of her bent over the sofa tied spread eagle with a ball gag in her mouth?

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:54 pm Greg Eliot

        There’s your homework assignment for this week’s Fight Club.

        LikeLike


  43. on February 17, 2014 at 3:12 pm dick fuel

    unfortunately never been arrested

    though 3 po’s who were seeking me yesterday found me literally on-the-shitter in the library restroom after a 5-10 minute search

    the only male cop asked ‘is everything all right in there’

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 6:07 pm FamilyMan

      Same question I’m asking, what happened?

      LikeLike


  44. on February 17, 2014 at 3:14 pm IamMarktoo

    I don’t get this “go to another country” for your woman! (Notice I put in a screamer there). As far as I’ve been able to ascertain, from visiting the vaginas of women on three/four continents (not that many countries) , they’re ALL fucking nuts. Some way beyond the ability of my nuts to deal with once emptied.

    Surely, better advice would be “enjoy it while it lasts, play it to last a little longer and then move on with no forwarding address”.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 6:20 pm FamilyMan

      If you’re just as happy with what you find here, then great. But I wouldn’t equate a 30 year old American to a 20 year old foreigner, other things being equal, for example.

      LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 9:24 am Jay in DC

      You are doing it wrong…

      I’m guessing one of your continents was Europe and you stayed west of Germany.

      Another was Australia, Western chicks part Deux.

      So that leaves your mystery third continent. If it was South America or Asia you were -definitely- doing it wrong.

      LikeLike


  45. on February 17, 2014 at 3:22 pm Scray

    “I’m simply trying to get people to open up their minds and quit clinging to antiquated notions of what a successful life looks like. I want people to lighten up on each other and themselves, and embrace their lives for who it has made them, with or without the Mrs., PhD. or Esq. attached.”

    Antiquated, AKA objective, right, correct.
    More lol bullshit.

    LikeLike


  46. on February 17, 2014 at 3:29 pm Dr Cad Mannequin Phil

    So how’s feminism working out for ya?

    LikeLike


  47. on February 17, 2014 at 3:35 pm Rum

    I get the joke within that picture. Despite all the damage, I still have a good memory.

    LikeLike


  48. on February 17, 2014 at 3:44 pm V

    This is the female equivalent of bronies.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 7:04 pm VRW

      best comment

      LikeLike


  49. on February 17, 2014 at 4:21 pm Mr.C

    Western women have “jumped the shark”.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumping_the_shark

    LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 5:02 pm thwack

      Hmmm… thats questionable, wasn’t there a fad a few years ago of women marrying themselves?

      or did somebody just make that up?

      LikeLike


  50. on February 17, 2014 at 4:29 pm bigdickeddeadgordon

    No offense to any that but be reading this, but, from what I can tell, American women are the worst – angrier, sluttier, and fatter. I’m sure there are exceptions, though.

    I’d love to wrap these fat slugs in bedsheets and send them to the middle-east and see how loud and promiscious they are with the mujahideen walking around with AK-47s and blood-stained machetes.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 4:55 pm Preston

      You could be onto something. Shariah is the antithesis of feminism.. along with a few other things.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:09 pm FamilyMan

        And the odd thing is, thru the Democratic party they’re voting to bring it here.

        Their understanding does not go beyond “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” Heh.

        LikeLike


  51. on February 17, 2014 at 5:02 pm Carlos Danger

    LikeLike


  52. on February 17, 2014 at 5:14 pm Wade

    I was just giving some advice to my nephew the other day, I said to him, “98% of the women in this country are NUTS” the other 2% are still women, and you have to understand them if you are going to have peace. You would have to be just a TV addict or one of the drones to NOT notice that women are NUTS today. And I don’t blame the women, per se, I blame the Marionettes who have been playing them in the media, print and electronic, the government schools, the freaking churches and every single aspect of “our” society has been DESIGNED to FUCK with our women’s heads. But guys let me tell you something, WHEN THE MAN tells you that American women are crazy, LISTEN TO HIM. Maybe do what I brother I know did, he went to the UKRAINE and got himself a woman who is LIKE the women of America USED to be. Just watch Bob Hope’s BACHELOR IN PARADISE for a taste of what it was like.

    Stay cool Heartiste dude
    LL/LR

    LikeLike


  53. on February 17, 2014 at 5:54 pm Manic Beta

    Isn’t the entire point of all this to be a shining cock on the hill for these lost souls? To bring them out of the wilderness, so to speak? I have found in my social experiments that many a lass loses her psychopathology when given a stern hand and stiff shaft.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 6:11 pm FamilyMan

      Not so much the ones past their fertility. But I have spent some time over on thoughtcatalog.com preaching redpill principles and getting most of them very very hamster-spinning angry.

      A couple women agreed with me, which got them a lot of grief. Feminism is hardest on the females.

      LikeLike


      • on February 17, 2014 at 6:45 pm Manic Beta

        Well on the interwebs are you in for a dog fight. I was referring to the in the flesh, unwavering eye contact, full court press.

        My last run in of this sort (with a mid-30s high school teacher) in the heat of battle I hit her with “why do you allow this ideology to make your so unhappy?” Hamster exploded.

        Full disclosure: never crammed her as greener pastures presented themselves elsewhere.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 6:40 am God damn

        Dude ur wrong 60% of time u r probably over there giving us a bad name. Boomers are too far gone to be red pill except the naturals.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 6:41 am God damn

        Boomers invented beta and raised their gen x daughters to be the complete and utter tatted up failures they are.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 9:51 am The Burninator

        GenX is in its 40’s right now, solidly. I don’t know many tatted up 40 something broads (they exist, but they’re rare compared to younger women).

        Now GenY, you’d be lucky to find two broads in a room of a thousand of them who was not tatted up.

        LikeLike


  54. on February 17, 2014 at 5:57 pm Director

    One or two might have been a good commentary. A life’s work? Complete madness. Arty girls are quite good fun and slutty…but this? She needs to stop. It burns.

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 6:13 pm FamilyMan

      Arty girls are attractive I agree. This is a faux-arty old spinster, whole different vibe to me.

      LikeLike


  55. on February 17, 2014 at 6:02 pm gunslingergregi

    at least she has a fucking dress on tired of looking at bitches in jeans and t-shirts

    LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 10:58 pm Kyo

      +1000

      LikeLike


  56. on February 17, 2014 at 6:14 pm Gro Haila

    quick points:

    Hentz means “refuse” back home.

    What would she do without the anonymous beta-schlub that mans her camera and schlepps around her stuff?

    But beyond the grotesque content, the photography itself is of grotesque mediocrity. Amateur photographers under commie yoke (thanx FDR!) were doing better than this.

    LikeLike


  57. on February 17, 2014 at 6:25 pm Isaac Asstomouf

    probably missed this in the replies above, but bet you a dollar the “daughter” is her fantasy tranny son.

    LikeLike


  58. on February 17, 2014 at 6:39 pm Anonymous

    Meh. Japan did it first.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fuccons

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 7:32 pm cynical beta

      I agree. Not original. Her ‘art’ reminds me a lot of the Hitori (one man date) Japanese guy, too.

      http://www.cnn.com/2013/12/04/travel/japan-one-man-date-photo/

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 6:38 am God damn

        All women of gen x think they are artists.

        LikeLike


  59. on February 17, 2014 at 7:22 pm ACG1

    From her site:

    “We love & obey the formatted image of a well-lived life. So deeply ingrained is that strange auto-grin we put on when a camera is present. Do we live our lives with a keen awareness of how it feels, or just how it looks? If I pass through life without checking off the boxes for a wedding ring and a baby carriage, I will be missing the photo album, but not not the point.”

    I don’t think these women have quite fleshed out the consequences of letting their youth and fertility expire without starting a family. The second half of their lives will be entirely devoid of human love and connection. That is fucking depressing. This woman is correct that marriage is a socially constructed norm, but she fails to recognize that it became that way for a damn good reason.

    LikeLike


  60. on February 17, 2014 at 8:12 pm Insanity

    Anyone interested in planning a trip to Phillipines? Wife expedition..

    LikeLike


    • on February 17, 2014 at 8:15 pm Greg Eliot

      I’d rather be celibate… the world’s already got it’s fill of striped biped mischlings

      LikeLike


      • on March 6, 2014 at 8:14 am jakoye23

        I have absolutely no doubt that you are celibate.

        LikeLike


    • on March 6, 2014 at 8:05 am jakoye23

      Ignore the Nazis on here (there’s a ton of ’em). The Philippines is an excellent safari destination for wife-hunting. Besides being slimmer and generally more attractive than Western women, their attitudes are also much healthier to nurturing a marriage and a family. They are, in general, much more concerned with pleasing their man than Western women and they’re certainly more sexual, while at the same time being more faithful.

      Of course, not ALL Pinays are like this. Some have been infected by Western culture and are nothing but gold-diggers and proto-feminists. But if you choose wisely, you will reap untold rewards.

      And most of them speak English very well, which is king, because there can be no true relationship with a woman who don’t speak-ah dah language.

      LikeLike


    • on March 6, 2014 at 8:14 am jakoye23

      Ignore the Nazis on here. The Philippines is an excellent place to find a worthy wife who will actually bear you children, not cheat on you and respect you as a man and your unique needs.

      Good luck.

      LikeLike


  61. on February 17, 2014 at 8:36 pm Anonymous

    I bet she straps a dildo to the mannequin and rides him.

    LikeLike


  62. on February 17, 2014 at 8:57 pm Anonymous

    which one is the dummy

    LikeLike


  63. on February 17, 2014 at 8:59 pm Pluviophile

    Matt King,

    Because of some of your comments and events in my life, I’ve been drawn back to the Christian faith of my youth. It’s been a long time. I’m not sure if I’m looking for justification of my worldview, or looking for answers to make more sense of the ugly world around me. I wasn’t raised Catholic, but I’m increasingly attracted towards Traditional Catholicism.

    I came across Society of St. Pius X. I found local churches in my area.

    What are your thoughts on this society?

    LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 10:26 am corvinus

      The SSPX has some political problems, and their leadership insists on recognizing the Marxist in the Vatican as a genuine pope, but at least you should be able to get the sacraments there.

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 5:28 pm Carlos Danger

        I may also suggest exploring the Orthodox church. After all, they will be the savior of Christianity In the end times. Their liturgy is also truer to the original Christian liturgy, hence the Orthodox. My criticism of the Roman Catholic Church is that celibacy prevents most of the best minds from entering the priesthood.

        LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 6:53 pm Matthew King

      I am not much acquainted with or enthusiastic about the ornery, reverse-oriented schismatics. I have no personal experience with SSPX, and if you find like-minded men there who will strengthen your faith, take support where you can get it. Beyond that, such nostalgiacs call to my mind St. Luke chapter 9: “No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God” (62).

      The excesses and misinterpretations of Vatican II were solved by the JP2 pontificate. Keep your faith simple and don’t go in for all the gaudy add-ons or get embroiled in trivial Catholica. I have a hundred criticisms of my parish, and plenty to not like about the magisterium; but all I need are the sacraments, mass, and a home for the real presence. I get my wisdom in disparate places thanks to the unprecedented access of the internet, from the Protestant Ravi Zacharias to the Orthodox David B. Hart to the Jew David Goldman (aka “Spengler”) — with my independent judgment as filter for heresy.

      My mentor is Father Robert Barron of Word on Fire, who not only unabashedly stands up for orthodox Catholicism in the culture (from film reviews to the application of heavy duty theology to the quotidian life) but also puts out a crackerjack sermon every week, and has an archive going back thirteen years/four full liturgical cycles. I have never heard a bad one, not once, and some are so profound that I have them practically memorized.

      So no matter the quality of local fellowship — which, as a Christian, should not faze you — I get regular, high-level guidance from spiritual geniuses. It’s not personalized advice, but I do not require or desire custom-tailored messaging. When a man is intellectually engaged and serious about such matters, as I suspect you are, he only requires a general mentorship. We can fill in the particularities ourselves.

      “I tell you, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who need no repentance.” (Luke 15:7)

      Welcome back to the victory, brother.

      Matt

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 8:13 pm Pluviophile

        Indeed.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 10:33 am Greg Eliot

        Matt can’t join the Latvian Orthodox church due to his kvorka.

        LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 7:30 pm bloxgicalconclusions

      be sure to ask them about their interpretation of incest in Genesis, Lot’s progeny leading to jeebus, why its better to dump a load in a whore than to beat your meat, before you down the kool-aid. among other blatant flabbergasting tenants.

      security =/= truth and if you depend solely on one group of people telling you how to think yer gonna be SOL

      LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 9:23 pm Matthew King

        Sophisticated argumentation. I’m this close to renouncing my faith. Never thought about the dangers of dogmatism until you showed up.

        Get the fuck out of my face, you fifth-rate village atheist. Tiresome isn’t even the word. How you fail to kill yourselves out of sheer ennui is beyond me.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 9:54 pm Anonymous

        “Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.” (Matthew 6:1)

        you don’t even know the jeebus parts, even the one w/ your namesake…

        LikeLike


      • on March 6, 2014 at 8:11 am jakoye23

        Of course he doesn’t. There’s absolutely nothing Jesus-like about Matthew King at all. He claims the religion, but has no actual intention of following the philosophy.

        Of course, the entire Christian religion is a load of manure, what with the utter contradiction of the Old Testament with the New. Only a schizophrenic would be able to be a “true believer” since Christianity is so riddled with contradictions.

        Kinda like “Matthew King, the Christian”.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 10:26 pm thwack

        bloxgicalconclusions

        be sure to ask them about their interpretation of incest in Genesis,
        ————————————————————————————————

        They got answers for that and its very interesting. The reason many people have trouble accepting scripture is because they make too many assumptions based on their contemporary existence.

        For example, many people both black and white have great difficulty imagining what life was like before the existence of a global system of white supremacy. They just can’t wrap their tiny minds around the concept so they make assumptions and then wonder why things don’t make sense.

        Think about this, before there was radio, tee-vee and amplification, in order to be a leader of men, you had not only be a master of language, but you had to have a STRONG, LOUD VOICE.

        People had to be able to hear you.

        Biblical scholars say people in the past were healthier and stronger than today and according to some researchers there is a scientific basis for this reasoning.

        Well a black man, ain’t got nothin in the world today….

        But you know in the old days, when the black man was a strong man, all the people step back when the black man walk by.

        LikeLike


      • on February 18, 2014 at 10:43 pm Mack

        God ‘ol thwack, reminiscing for the days when monkey muscles were more important than neocortex function. Those were the days! Ah, yes, if we could only go back… But wait, you can! A one way ticket to Africa will only cost you $995.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 10:15 am thwack

        Mack

        God ‘ol thwack, reminiscing for the days when monkey muscles were more important than neocortex function.
        ———————————————————————————————

        I can become smarter as I become older. But you can’t become stronger as you get older. Thats why you are here. The white man is no longer respected like he once was.

        Well a white man, ain’t got nothin in the world today….

        But you know in the old days, when the white man was a strong man, all the people step back when the white man walk by.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 10:31 am Greg Eliot

        The reason many people have trouble accepting scripture is because they make too many assumptions based on their contemporary existence.

        Damn, that’s a golden moment right there.

        Too bad you had to f@ck it up with the rest of your usual n166er-babble.

        Still, credit where due, and props on the rightness of the aforementioned snippet.

        LikeLike


      • on February 19, 2014 at 10:36 am Greg Eliot

        be sure to ask them about their interpretation of incest in Genesis, Lot’s progeny leading to jeebus, why its better to dump a load in a whore than to beat your meat, before you down the kool-aid. among other blatant flabbergasting tenants.

        security =/= truth and if you depend solely on one group of people telling you how to think yer gonna be SOL

        Who told YOU that you could comment when men are talking?

        You fairy.

        Come and get one in the yarbles, if’n ya got any yarbles… eunuch jelly, thou!

        LikeLike


  64. on February 17, 2014 at 11:19 pm cynthia

    Women, last I checked, don’t have to get married or have children anymore. The contempt, staging, and costumes in these photos all would seem to indicate a twisted interpretation of reality. The only person imposing this worldview on her is, therefore, her.

    How sad feminists must be, to see the world in this reductionist way.

    LikeLike


    • on February 19, 2014 at 10:38 am Greg Eliot

      The contempt, staging, and costumes in these photos all would seem to indicate a twisted interpretation of reality.

      The technical term is JAP Weltanshauung.

      LikeLike


  65. on February 17, 2014 at 11:36 pm Col Nicholson

    I hate this fucking picture. What an obnoxious cunt.

    I lived a block away on Ave. Charles-Floquet during my time in Paris, just off the mannequin’s right shoulder. I walked in this beautiful park almost every day.

    LikeLike


  66. on February 18, 2014 at 2:57 am walawala

    OK…anyone thinking “women are special” or ‘not my special snowflake” watch this.

    LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 2:48 pm Suburban_elk

      What was Act II ?

      LikeLike


  67. on February 18, 2014 at 3:22 am Crazy American Women Are Getting Crazier | Trut...

    […] A very homely, urbanely decayed spinster has taken photographs of herself posed with male and child mannequins, presumably as some sort of statement on the present condition of her bifurcated ego.  […]

    LikeLike


  68. on February 18, 2014 at 7:11 am JP

    I guarantee you that if this woman’s house was searched you would find several taxidermied human corpses.

    LikeLike


  69. on February 18, 2014 at 7:39 am Mel Gibson

    http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/climate_desk/2014/02/internet_troll_personality_study_machiavellianism_narcissism_psychopathy.html

    “The research {…} sought to directly investigate whether people who engage in trolling are characterized by personality traits that fall in the so-called Dark Tetrad: {…}”

    lulz

    LikeLike


  70. on February 18, 2014 at 8:03 am PR

    you know what would actually be funny/ironic? a pic of a hot babe surrounded by cats.

    LikeLike


  71. on February 18, 2014 at 8:21 am chris

    Feb 11 2014

    Males and females differ in specific brain structures

    http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-02-males-females-differ-specific-brain.html

    LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 4:59 pm neurobloxology

      this is CH gold but unfortunately probably beyond the scope of discussion here without parsing out the role of each structure in the larger machine.

      the only reason the last one took off is because it offered a pretty picture of left vs. right brain

      thread winner for content alone tho

      LikeLike


  72. on February 18, 2014 at 11:29 am jg1

    Here is even more craziness of American women…more masculinization…

    http://xfinity.comcast.net/video/Breaking-a-Barrier-A-Woman-Plays-Professional-Football/158066755544/Comcast/Today_in_Video/?cid=hero_sf

    LikeLike


  73. on February 18, 2014 at 4:26 pm Rant Casey - RS

    Have you guys considered the hypothesis that the continued presence of an american man around a woman is quite possibly the root cause of her becoming an unbearable bitch?

    Gringos… first retreated into silence to avoid dealing with they’re wives, and now the shrews are so insane they have to flee the country.

    Now you not only want the third world to produce goods for you guys, but also do the hard work of putting women in place for ya.

    Overseas my ass.

    You enabled it, you solve it at home.

    We should shut down the borders. Who knows how many gringos it takes to turn an entire female population into frumpy and fat psycho man haters? Better not take any chances.

    LikeLike


    • on February 18, 2014 at 8:15 pm Col Nicholson

      Your hypothesis has been considered. In 1979 Dr. Pierre Mornell wrote the book “Passive Men, Wild Women,” the exact dynamic you’re describing.
      It caught my attention years later because I saw my own mother & father as well as many other couples acting it out.

      So yeah, millions of American men came home from work wanting to be left the fuck alone in front of the tube and wifey went bat-shit. It’s only gotten worse – so bad in fact that we’re now in the era of the “man – cave,” a repulsive concept which is really just surrender.

      Funny that this book came out at the exact moment when all that sensitivity bullshit was really taking hold. You say “the hard work of putting women in place,” and it’s true but the equally hard work of getting into and staying in the UMC sapped or distracted the post-war American male wrt fundamental male/female truths.

      LikeLike


    • on February 19, 2014 at 6:07 am Greg Eliot

      A fair point, hermano… and a wise man loves a reproof.

      LikeLike


  74. on February 18, 2014 at 5:16 pm zek

    Teh crazy is not limited to YKWesses.

    How to Cuddle With a Camel

    LikeLike


    • on February 19, 2014 at 6:06 am Greg Eliot

      Dumbass… that’s just some young girl with her pet… not some yenta mocking white culture with her perverted art on the dime of her tribal media masters.

      We ordered oranges, not apples… you fairy..

      There’s one thing you gotta learn about WASPS, Bud… they love animals, and hate people.

      LikeLike


  75. on February 20, 2014 at 8:34 am ANU News.net Crazy American Women Are Getting Crazier

    […] If you thought 21st Century American women have plumbed the depths of crazy, you’d be wrong. There’s totes crazy left in those desiccated wombs and ravaged holes where their feminine hearts used to reside. Expect to see a plague of crazy visited upon the women of the West, as the modern diversity industrial complex and no-holds-barred sexual market drives the wedge deeper between their mothering and materialistic desires. We have only begun to bear witness to a total meltdown of the American woman’s psyche. https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/02/17/crazy-american-women-are-getting-crazier/ […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Jack Silva on Red Tsunami?
    Jack Silva on Red Tsunami?
    Jack Silva on Red Tsunami?
    Carlos Danger on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Jack Silva on Shitlib Logic Trap!
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: