• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Beta Male Takeaway Game
Should You Make A Girlfriend Jealous With Nudes Of Your Exes? »

Salon Discovers Chateau Heartiste, Angry Menstruation Flows On Cue

February 21, 2014 by CH

Salon, the nation’s hindmost menstrual rag of note, stumbled onto Chateau Heartiste grounds and promptly WOWJUSTWOWed until they were overcome with shameful orgasms.

18 hilariously terrible sex tips that all men should ignore. […]

3. “A woman may want financial and family security, but she does not want passion security. In the same manner, when she has displeased you, punish swiftly, but when she has done you right, reward slowly.” (Chateau Heartiste, pickup artist site)

It works for the Dog Whisperer so it must be true.

In fact, successfully dating women and dog training do share quite a few disturbing similarities.

Naturally, the vapid Salon entity has no rebuttal to offer other than lazy snark.

6. “Flirt with other women in front of her. Do not dissuade other women from flirting with you.Women will never admit this but jealousy excites them. The thought of you turning on another woman will arouse her sexually.” (Cheateau Heartiste)

Of course women (and men) [ed: no, men don’t viscerally respond to jealousy incitement the same way women do] want their partner to be perceived as desirable to others. But intentionally trying to make your partner jealous is a pathetic power trip used by the most insecure. And no, women “will never admit” it because it’s not true. Just like men “will never admit” they love surprise anal.

Women who deign to write for globally transmitted magazines really need to begin the arduous task of reading subject matter outside their feminist automaton comfort zones. For instance, CH is not the only one to observe through direct experience that women’s arousal and jealousy are two sides of the same coin; studies have found over and over that “female preselection” — that is, a man’s social and romantic approval by other women — acts directly as an attraction stimulant on any women in his company. Unlike this Salon broad’s non sequitur about “surprise anal” (which, as if it needed to be said, few heterosexual men outside the Salon staff hothouse of lactating manboobs secretly desire), making a woman jealous is proven to work as a means of increasing her romantic arousal. A man deploying such a tactic may or may not be “insecure”, but there’s no arguing with results.

8. “Give your woman two-thirds of everything she gives you. For every three calls or texts, give her two back. Three declarations of love earn two in return. Three gifts; two nights out. Give her two displays of affection and stop until she has answered with three more. When she speaks, you reply with fewer words. When she emotes, you emote less… In her deepest loins it is what she truly wants.” (Chateau Heartiste)

And if she responds with one word, reply with a series of monosyllabic grunts or through miming. She thinks she’s got you in a box, but little does she know, it’s INVISIBLE. Treating every exchange with women like a manipulative math problem is ¾ stupid, ⅝ sad, and 100 percent guaranteed to make you into an ex variable.

Math is hard.

Also, did he just call my loins shallow?

Women should avoid trying to be funny altogether and stick to maximizing the return on their authentically valuable assets. That would be your tits, ass, face and pussy, in case you were wondering.

A word of advice, Salonista: Humorless reductio ad absurdum and inapt mischaracterizations are no way to win debate points.

There’s a reason “mainstream” feminists rarely confront the House of Heartiste head on, preferring instead to snipe futilely from a safe and plausibly deniable distance (see: Lindy “Huge Fat Fuck” West), protectively ensconced by an army of reject freaks spit-shining feminist taint. When an unfortunate representative of their diseased order attempts an ill-prepared direct assault on CH, mistakenly presuming her enemy is a chucklehead bro who can’t wield a shiv like an assassin, she is typically flayed alive and retreats in shock with her fat beaver tail tucked between her ham hocks, never to be heard from again. So they will continue to toss feeble snark turds from their internet hovels while CH continues tearing apart everything they believe and hold dear, sinew by sinew, until the last of them self-delivers or sticks it out in everlasting torment to enjoy her gradual soul-desiccating abandonment by those she considers respectable discourse gatekeepers.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Feminist Idiocy, Ugly Truths | 229 Comments

229 Responses

  1. on February 21, 2014 at 2:40 pm Ras Al ghul

    And the more they do this, the more blue pillers head over and begin to see the light . . . er dark of the dark enlightenment.

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on February 21, 2014 at 3:10 pm Zombie Shane

      This poor girl is pretty schizo.

      Here’s her “Bio”:

      http://annapulley.com/bi-o/

      And here’s a blurb about her at the Sun Times:

      http://blogs.suntimes.com/ourtown/2012/04/the_hot_chicago_writer_blog_3.html

      Honestly, just from perusing what little there is to peruse at those two links, I kinda feel sorry for her.

      She’s probably an SSRI or Adderall prescription away from needing full-time institutionalization.

      The Innate White Knight in me finds it kinda tough to rag too hard on the ones who are actually nuts.

      [CH: Her evisceration is an example for the others; namely, Salon honchos who insist on hiring this detritus to represent their shitlib brand. There is no safe haven anymore. The front lines are everywhere.]

      LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 3:27 pm corvinus

        Here’s her “Bio”:

        Note the short hair. And then read her reply to the suggestion that short-haired women are deranged. lzozlozlzozz

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 3:30 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

        Is it just me or does she actually look like a dog?

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 3:34 pm Zombie Shane

        I was actually thinking about setting her up with Heartiste, on a date, and then he could report back as to whether or not she was multi-orgasmic or simply just frigid.

        Shivving the frigid bitches is worse than just whacking off.

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 3:49 pm pulsotic

        I can see it. Although I really expected her to be uglier, like the fatty sucking down the sundae from the FB post.

        If she were straight she’d be worth a hail mary last call pump ‘n dump.

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 4:03 pm corvinus

        She is certainly a bitch.

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 4:48 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        What breed are you thinking of?

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 10:11 pm Jeremy

        I’d go with unshaggable.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 22, 2014 at 9:08 am thwack

        Canardlie

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 9:22 am Newbie

        She looks more like the ass of an hamster.

        Her face has some disturbing lines… fuck!

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 11:51 am Greg Eliot

        She looks more like that extinct lesbian dinosaur… Licktalottapus.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 2:36 pm mmaier2112

        Yeah… that Dykeasaurus is just not attractive. But then again, she’s not exactly dolling up. Maybe some dude should fuck her so she’s inclined to look better.

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 3:31 pm Zombie Shane

        > ” Salon honchos who insist on hiring this detritus”

        http://www.salon.com/about/staff/

        Chief Executive Officer & Chief Technology Officer
        Cindy Jeffers – JEWESS

        Interim Chief Financial Officer
        Elizabeth Hambrecht – JEWESS

        Vice President, Sales
        Matthew Sussberg – JEW

        Director of Product
        Rachel Hagen – likely a JEWESS

        Associate Managing Editor
        Ruth Henrich – JEWESS

        Plus some Southern Irish Papist drunks, with names like Daley and O’Donoghue.

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 3:45 pm pulsotic

        From the blurb:
        “Anna writes a weekly sex advice column for the Chicago Tribune’s RedEye, despite having sex about four times a year.”

        She has a ton of experience with giving advice in areas she doesn’t have experience in. AKA, talking out her ass.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 21, 2014 at 3:50 pm Hugh G. Rection

        That’s kinda the point because all the neurotic broads who read that crap identify with her. Kinda like how many stand-up comedians are ugly.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 9:23 am Newbie

        lol true though

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 4:27 pm tang3zang

        What is it with feminists going around talking like they’re the expert on what all women want? Anna looks too ugly to be regarded seriously.

        Say again, for SRS:

        The value of a woman’s dating opinion is directly correlated to how desirable she is.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 22, 2014 at 4:05 am tspark156

        That’s what feminism is, a shallow discipline accredited by self appointed experts for self appointed experts.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 22, 2014 at 9:28 am Newbie

        And even then…

        But now, seriously, I don’t care how beautiful a woman is when she airs an opinion or a thought.

        I just think that, when women start spewing shit like this, shit that overflows and corromps society, shuttering lives of way too many to count…
        well, then, I think that a girl spewing this kind of shit to such a wide audience should be punished in accordance to how ugly she is,

        that is,

        accordingly to how much a piece of shit she is and how much she is uncapable of giving any pleasure or contribution to society.

        Punch her face.
        Insert your fist in her vagina and pull her outwards.

        She IS the kind of person who MUST be punished for the sake of all of us. Including our daughters / sisters / grand nieces, etc. Future of present.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 9:30 am Newbie

        corromps = corrosive burn

        My english was better when I was younger.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 9:31 am Newbie

        shuttering = shattering

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 11:27 am OralCummings

        Why are feminists pretending to care about men being romantic failures? “Do this and you’ll be dumped!”,say the femimists.Fems lay awake at night worrying about our stiffies? “gee I hope men out there are getting pussy…”

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 12:53 pm Stingray

        They’re not thinking at all of the men. They are thinking of their wives and girlfriends. It’s herd mentality.

        LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 21, 2014 at 4:57 pm V

        to be fair, i think her denial of the jealousy/arousal thing might be sincere. as ugly as she is (2, maybe a 3?), flirting with other (prettier) women in front of her might be more likely to make her insecure. so of course she accuses such men of being insecure…

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 7:03 pm Zombie Shane

        I’m worried about this one.

        I hope she’s sufficiently mentally stable to hold up to the barrage from the Chateau.

        She might literally crack under the strain of it.

        I’ll try to remember to say a little prayer for her tonight.

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 7:55 pm Joe Sixpack

        Yes, it is very much like this Qi Gong Kaia Master who, for years, believed he had supernatural bullshit powers due to legions of Kareteka Yes-Men fake-fighting him like you would a 5 year old playing Batman.

        Only to meet a real MMA fighter who didn’t get the memo.

        VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wd7M4H0b62k

        These womyn have such a sickening air of superiority yet often have never walked even 10 feet (let alone a mile) in the high heels of SMV 7+ women. They speak from such a position of haughty self-righteousness and arrogance, yet.have less lifetime experience dealing with men’s advances and desires than many HBs have by the time they are 18 years old.

        For such womyn, hearing such truths spoken raw and unfiltered, putting into intelligently-spoken words the reality that the deep recess of their brain knows to be the harsh truth, is often a very painful, jagged pill to swallow.

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 8:18 pm Zombie Shane

        But I’m worried about this one.

        I feel like it’s more than just the standard issue femcunt hatefulness – where the Frankfurt School inculcates that pavlovian response in them so that they get all vicious like pitbulls when crossed.

        This one strikes me as being pretty badly mentally ill – and rather mentally unstable.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 5:12 am Carlos Danger

        They’re pissed. What do you expect? Actually, she makes herself unattractive. She has nice facial features and with a good re-make would shine right up. However, what she does with her looks is reflective of her inner conflicts.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 6:55 am Kate

        There’s something of Jessica Biel in her eyes and face. I think she could really enhance that with longer hair.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 7:13 am Greg Eliot

        Actually, there’s something of the über-bish in her eyes.

        Pass… I don’t care how much of a makeover you give her.

        And go tend to your kitchen, woman.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 3:27 pm Zombie Shane

        > “something of Jessica Biel”

        It’s that puffy bottom lip.

        Collagen was what I immediately wondered about.

        But maybe it’s natural?

        Her stare is unnatural, though, as if she’s complete nuts or on some heavy-duty psychotropics or both.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 10:11 pm Carlos Danger

        All the same, she seems to have a lot of Daddy rage.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 8:33 am Anonymous

        Wut? She should kill herself

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 4:24 pm Zombie Shane

        > “She should kill herself”

        C’mon, man, that’s exactly what I’m talking about.

        Don’t joke about that shit when you’re dealing with someone who is so obviously unstable.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 9:32 am Newbie

        why?

        … you fairy.

        Hat tip to Greg Eliot

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 5:35 pm Peter Connor

        I notice no info on her age.

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 5:44 pm tteclod

        From the second link, I provide the following quote, which establishes plenty.

        ” My guilty pleasure book: That would be, Dark Angels. Otherwise known as lesbian vampire erotica. If you replace “guilty” with “self,” that is.”

        Skip the rest.

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 6:45 pm FamilyMan

        She’s also bisexual. She’s just too smart to fuck only men.

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 8:21 pm Zombie Shane

        FM, this chick is nuts.

        Have you tried to read any of her essays?

        Looney Tunes.

        LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 6:04 pm Fred C Dobbs

      And CH is a tad more than a pickup site. To rediscover the truth after years of being marinated in lies allows the converted to walk again with dignity. The war continues. http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentaries/246573711.html

      LikeLike


  2. on February 21, 2014 at 2:49 pm Asdas

    I’m surprised they even linked your blog. With all the other PC unfriendly topics covered, you’d think they’d stay away period.

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 10:18 pm FamilyMan

      She’s getting paid. That’s her weakness. She has to generate readers, churn. Even at the expense of selling out the cause.

      She never believed the cause anyway. Feminism doesn’t really excite passion in women, that’s why it is pushed on them so hard.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on February 22, 2014 at 4:08 am l82dagame

      This is the type of thing that makes me feel like we still live in a free country. I’ve gotten some people to start reading CH, and I know it’s resonating. At the end of the day, it’s in the DNA of men to not want to be shit all over and to triumph and succeed at life. I’ll be damned if we let the Cathedral win…that shit is gradually crumbling and about to fall down.

      LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 5:47 am Stingray

      The lure of attention vs hiding this information from her readers; most of the time attention is going to win.

      LikeLiked by 1 person


      • on February 22, 2014 at 7:16 am Greg Eliot

        Exactamundo! The only ones that can actually pull off that Dynamic Silence technique are its originators of the masculine gender.

        LikeLike


  3. on February 21, 2014 at 2:52 pm Krul

    “Women should avoid trying to be funny altogether and stick to maximizing the return on their authentically valuable assets. That would be your tits, ass, face and pussy, in case you were wondering.”

    We Leg Men are a dying breed.

    [CH: Legs are an extension of the ass. Act locally, think holistically.]

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 3:51 pm Hugh G. Rection

      I’m always thinking holeistic, so pussy, mouth, ass it is (order chosen arbitrarily).

      LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 10:19 pm FamilyMan

      No we’re not Krul, we know which end of the women creates the babies.

      LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 7:17 am Greg Eliot

        Most of the self-styled PUAs around here couldn’t tell arse from quim.

        LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 7:18 am Greg Eliot

      Legs are an extension of the ass. Act locally, think holistically.

      Now, that’s droll… (((golf clap)))

      LikeLike


  4. on February 21, 2014 at 2:56 pm Scesci

    Gee wiz, this article is brutal, feels like reading the fundamental premise again

    [CH: Tough love. Nah, who am I kidding? This was pure sadistic fun.]

    LikeLike


  5. on February 21, 2014 at 3:01 pm Uncle Elmer

    Be prepared for “Heartiste and by Extension, The Manosphere, be Racist!!!” headline.

    [CH: The problem with this counterinsurgency tactic is that CH will hit back, unlike the usual reflexive response of pseudo-cons who prostrate with haste before the leftoid whine machine.]

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 7:17 pm askjoe

      I like how ROK is doing feminist exposes on femmy automatons that attack the manosphere. Like Anil or this thing, rebecca sparrow:

      http://www.returnofkings.com/28559/why-is-rebecca-sparrow-attacking-young-moms-for-staying-slim-and-pretty

      I mean, wow, just wow. Way to take someone apart.

      LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 8:35 am Anonymous

        Yeah that’s a great one. I sent a message to the author using my real name thanking him.

        LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 4:46 am Jay in DC

      It is what, ultimately, puts you head and shoulders above the rest. The ability to speak the truth, supposedly protected by Ammendment One, is being eroded.

      All Speech is Equal, but some Speech is more Equal than Other Speech.

      I’ve already HTTracked your site and IrishSavants too. Because why? Ya’ll niggas may end up in jail in 2014. If so, I will carry the torch until I go back to jail (again!) and someone else mirrors the websites.

      LikeLike


      • on February 24, 2014 at 4:06 am John S

        Might be time to look into namecoin… It’s like Bitcoin for your dns. Doesn’t go through icann..

        .bit addresses should be a lot harder to take down by arbitrary Cathedral dictate.

        LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 7:20 am Greg Eliot

      Henchman standing by the ready.

      LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 1:07 pm irishsavant

        Good for you guys. May The Force be with you.

        LikeLike


  6. on February 21, 2014 at 3:02 pm Coyy

    Its been taken off line.

    [CH: 😆 ]

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 3:07 pm greginaurora

      That’s their only recourse when people disagree with them. That or turning off comments.

      LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 3:59 pm Hugh Mann

        I think they’re clever enough to take out direct links from CH, because it still seems to be on the web. Just archived the page at wayback in case it’s removed for good.

        http://web.archive.org/web/20140221225703/http://www.salon.com/2014/02/21/18_hilariously_terrible_sex_tips_that_all_men_should_ignore_partner/

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 4:03 pm corvinus

        They weren’t clever enough to not include the links in the first place.

        LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 6:46 pm FamilyMan

      Seems to be online now at CH’s link, but no comments under the article, hm why?

      LikeLike


  7. on February 21, 2014 at 3:06 pm Goodness, why??

    Feminism as ideology is held by the undesirables.

    Feminism as fashion is held by the rest.

    [CH: Mock feminism until it becomes unfashionable, and its ideological component will wither in step.]

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 3:35 pm Zombie Shane

      To be completely successful, you’ll have to mock the underlying Judaism of the folks who invented feminism.

      LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 5:03 pm Kim Soo Hyun

        Zombie Shane, Why you are a White?

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 5:42 pm driveallnight

        Dear Wasabi-Taco,

        Please go away until you can troll in comprehensible English, or I will cuntpunt you.

        xoxo,
        driveallnight

        LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 9:37 pm Guerrero

        Lolz, I see you didn’t understood properly my question, it wasn’t simple about the obvious like “because my parents are White duh or because I am not Black” ,it was deep and philosophical, I tried to say if he believes he is White because some kind of destiny, eh?

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 1:32 am Mob Barley

        How many names jewgot?

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 9:12 am thwack

        Jew don’t wanna know.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 2:20 pm EternalFeministGirl

        As many names as the poster with a Brown avatar, high five to him.

        LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 9:32 am Carlos Danger

      It’s pretty easy to be fashionable about Feminism when its gets all the rules bent in your direction.

      LikeLike


  8. on February 21, 2014 at 3:06 pm Tilikum

    well, lets be honest. feminism exists much like religion does, as a control and shaming (or shamuing?) mechanism that allows access to mating opportunities for the fatties and fugugs, in direct conflict to the pretty girls at the top of the food chain.

    you can’t blame them for trying to take what power they can convince men to give them can you?

    poor little cretinous skanks, it’s all they can do or hope to have. i just feel bad for em.

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 3:08 pm Tilikum

      and it has NADA to do with men.

      LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 4:00 pm Hugh G. Rection

      I doubt that. It’s the beta males who are losing out relatively, not the pretty girls. It’s not like they could convince men to find uggos and fatties desirable.

      LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 5:16 pm Tilikum

        i should have been clearer. the war is a proxy really, beta males are say, vietnam, while america and russia are the ladiez.

        LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 5:37 pm Peter Connor

      It aint working.

      LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 6:15 pm Tilikum

        no doubt.

        LikeLike


  9. on February 21, 2014 at 3:07 pm Reformed Hippie

    linking here on any of these sites is a bad a idea. how did I discover Le chateau? I liked reading Jezebel because at least it (unlike much of the media) acknowledged gender. they linked here, and it immediately clicked, describing exactly what I did unconsciously in my 2 1/2 year relationship which was not just good but fantastic.

    once a man has reached 25 years old, he has had enough experiences that the truth presented here rings true, it just gives him a language to express what he already deep down knows. I’ll bet just the links in this article result in a few hundred new pupils.

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 3:12 pm greginaurora

      I found Kim Du Toit’s old site the same way. Some Lefty site was whining about “The Pussification of The Western Male” and I followed the link. His was the first website I’d ever read that left me feeling better for having read it, rather than wondering what the fuck was wrong with everyone everywhere.

      LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 5:02 pm Canadian Friend

        I found this site because a woman in the comment section of a political blog was complaining about the fact all the men she meets are influenced by CH.

        I had to know what she was talking about, my inquisitive mind brought me here, and I never left

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 1:40 am Mob Barley

        For real? Damn we’re mainstream yo!

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 7:43 am thwack

        I found this site after black people kicked me off their blogs because they said I was racist (white).

        Telling the truth = racism

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 9:55 am Greg Eliot

        I found this site when one of those black bloggers sent me a Moon Pie and a bottle of grape drank if I would come to the chateau and deride thwack’s white racism.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 11:22 am thwack

        Nobody loves me. Its because Im black isn’t it?

        buddhuu

        Some trolls seem to specialise in being irrationally and childishly rude to women.
        ————————————————————————————————

        Some men seem to specialise in being weak and flacid to women in the hopes of “getting some”; yet all they ever get is an empty wallet and a blue sack.

        buddhuu

        @ thwack:

        You are a poisonous, nasty piece of work.
        —————————————————————————————————-

        buddhuu, you do not yet realize your importance. You have only begun to discover your power. Join me, and I will complete your training. With our combined strength, we can end this destructive conflict and bring order to this blog.

        Search your feelings, you know it to be true.

        Herneith

        @thwack:

        Listen Uncle Thomas, your misogyny towards black women is showing. There is no call to resort to such insults.
        —————————————————————————————————-

        Be silent woman. Your vanity and insufferable hypergamy are the reason we are in the position we are in today; its not the white man, it you and your big mouth; you just won’t listen to ANYBODY except thugs, players and SERPENTS.

        “Unto the woman he said, I will greatly increase thy sorrows, and thy conceptions. In sorrow shalt thou bring forth children, and thy desire shall be subject to thine husband, and he shall rule over thee.”

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 1:00 pm OralCummings

        I found this site while reading Steve Sailers blog;it was whiskey that mentioned it in one of his rants about how women hate,hate hate beta males.

        LikeLike


      • on February 24, 2014 at 11:23 am Edward Waverley

        I also found CH through Sailer, who I’ve read for years. The first few times that I saw commenters there talking alpha/beta I just skimmed over the jargon, not quite knowing what was being described but not quite wondering either. When I realized that the guys were skewering feminism, I got to reading and never looked back. As for finding Sailer, it was by way of VDARE. As for finding VDARE it was by way of reading Chronicles, who are among the only conservative foundations to oppose third-world immigration pretty much since it started to go forward in the ’70’s. Nationalism entails anti-immigrationism, anti-immigrationism entails acknowledging HBD/IQ polemics, acknowledging HBD/IQ polemics usually produces awareness of, and excoriation of, feminism and by that time, you are well on your way to debunking the whole Cathedral.

        LikeLike


  10. on February 21, 2014 at 3:08 pm Anonymous

    Such surprise: http://annapulley.com/bi-o/

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 3:18 pm everybodyhatesscott

      Yup. She has short hair. Basically her whole article was “I”M NOT UGLY!”

      LikeLike


  11. on February 21, 2014 at 3:11 pm Anon

    I just WOWJUSTWOWed at the last paragraph.

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 3:12 pm Anon

      Brogasm is another way to put it.

      LikeLike


  12. on February 21, 2014 at 3:17 pm Jordan Ciccone

    She looks every bit of snarky, unbearable cunt as her writing suggests.

    LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 1:02 pm OralCummings

      Wait til she approacheth…the WALL!!!

      LikeLike


  13. on February 21, 2014 at 3:21 pm TLM

    Clearly the chick never watched the Dog Whisperer. The whole show was that little spic teaching beta male fags how to alpha up and control their bitches. It works exactly the same way with women.

    LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 9:57 am Greg Eliot

      Yeah, but his skill with hounds didn’t translate to his own wife… sigh… when I heard about that mess, I had the same “Say it ain’t so, Joe!” reaction as that little kid of yesteryear upon hearing of the Black Sox scandal.

      LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 1:21 pm whorefinder

        Cesar’s a classic “alpha with the job, beta with the wife” kind of guy. In today’s world, it is promoted to run your business as the boss, but yet, somehow, you’re no longer king of your own castle. Used to be Don Draper-esque: your attitude at home was to be the same as your attitude at work.

        Plus, Cesar was getting tons of come -ons due to fame from his show. Every chick in America with a dog, and every middle aged housewife especially, wanted his beta-cock due to fame. Unlike a true alpha, he couldn’t keep the wife in line with his philandering.

        When my young cousin asked me about picking up girls, I explained to him there were two routes: “1. You can learn red-pill game, master it, and, in a few years, can cold-approach women all the time and get some from them; or 2. buy a guitar.”

        LikeLike


      • on February 23, 2014 at 10:58 am corvinus

        Cesar’s a classic “alpha with the job, beta with the wife” kind of guy.

        I’ll never understand such men.

        LikeLike


      • on February 23, 2014 at 12:09 pm whorefinder

        It’s not actually that hard, just hard for us nowadays to get. When societies starting pairing men and women off in married pairs, the guys/God who came up with the idea knew that most men, by definition, were beta, and most women, by nature, wanted only alpha. So they set up all sorts of rules to make the wife beta to the husband by law, so she would look up to the husband, while teaching the husband rules to run his wife by and be more alpha. One only has to look at the Bible n to see how central ruling your wife was to a happy society, and how most men needed to be taught how to do it.

        In jobs, too, many betas can and are trained in leadership courses to make them more socially alpha, or at least less beta. Leadership can be learned, and is very useful for a business. Good militaries could train their brightest betas into alphas.

        The problem is that society today looks very much down on men ruling at home, so such training is shit upon. Men enter marriages as betas at home and stay that way, and women do not expect the men to rule over them.

        This is why marriage in the U.S. is fucked.

        LikeLike


    • on February 23, 2014 at 12:58 pm BalkanMan

      I trying to teach mankind around me last few years, ” watch Cesar and learn how to deal with women and children. ”

      Somehow .. 99% thinks I’m a rude-macho-egoist-chauvinist .. and more,

      1% thinks i’m just plane crazy

      LikeLike


  14. on February 21, 2014 at 3:21 pm Buzz Nutter

    Salon and the Chateau are my two favorite websites….go figure.

    LikeLike


  15. on February 21, 2014 at 3:45 pm Uncle Elmer

    The worst insult was including your pointers with those from Men’s Health, which is run by women and has a “feminist” blog :

    http://blogs.menshealth.com/mh-feminist/

    LikeLike


  16. on February 21, 2014 at 3:50 pm FuriousFerret

    I understand the hate from Salon and HuffPo and all those other MSM rags but what I can’t grasp is dismal of Libertinism from places like Vice. Vice supposedly is a alt news and subculture site. Libertinism should be right up their alley.

    Just goes to show you that there is hard cutoff which women simply won’t accept. They will go along with cutting up their bodies and printing all over them, doing copious amounts of hard drugs and fucking like bunnies if they are of wild nature but they draw the line in the sand when faced with conscious hard red pill knowledge of the brutality of Darwinian intersexual relations

    By the way, that’s what I’m calling CH’s ethos now. It’s neo-Libertinism. Much more accurate description than Manosphere or Alt Right. It’s good old Marquis De Sade, John Wilmot reborn. Biting social commentary aimed at fucking with the established while at the same time gleaning from the entertainment and cultural events they provide.

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 4:31 pm tang3zang

      Vice is just mildly quirky shit that stays well within the bounds of political correctness. No real edge there.

      LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 9:41 pm Matthew

        It’s obviously a propaganda organ.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 1:50 am Mob Barley

        I never heard of libertinism but I just checked it out and appreciate it more than the subtly different philosophy of hedonism.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 1:06 pm OralCummings

        Ive got one of those hanging between my legs.

        LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 7:41 pm Arbiter

      A libertine is someone who doesn’t have any moral restraints. If that’s what you think CH is about, you haven’t read carefully enough.

      LikeLike


  17. on February 21, 2014 at 3:54 pm little spoon

    Re- Asperger’s in women tweet – I think I should quote that back to you next time you call me a spergy droid.

    [CH: Why? Are you also a cute girl?]

    LikeLike


    • on February 23, 2014 at 7:51 am little spoon

      Baby, I want 2 be so cute 4 u.

      LikeLike


  18. on February 21, 2014 at 3:58 pm sablox

    “Once you’ve blown someone while also consuming your daily dose of carbohydrates at the same time, then we’ll talk about “skills,” okay?”

    skrillex hair be damned, would bang

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 5:48 pm cynthia

      Wait, semen is carbs now?

      LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 9:42 pm Matthew

        I’m imagining a sort of trencher-like arrangment.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 1:52 am Mob Barley

        Yes Cynthia a woman must exercise after she swallows.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 7:25 am Greg Eliot

        Woman! Nunnery! Get thee hence!

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 1:07 pm OralCummings

        At the nunnery she’ll be eating pussy.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 4:59 pm cynthia

        Pretty sure that only happens in porn… you ever seen a real-life nun?

        LikeLike


      • on February 23, 2014 at 2:42 pm Amy

        It’s mostly protein and it’s low calorie also. She’s clueless.

        LikeLike


  19. on February 21, 2014 at 4:04 pm Scray

    ” But intentionally trying to make your partner jealous is a pathetic power trip used by the most insecure. ”

    Lol, the province of women is to talk as if words have power. DON’T DO THAT BECAUSE ONLY LOSERS DO THAT. Hahahahaha. May as well read ‘oh my god, don’t abuse your powweeeer over me, please donnnn’t, but I love it sooooooooooooo.’

    On a more serious note, being honest and realistic about the world allows you to wade through so much bullshit. It’s incredible. You understand relationships, dynamics, “blue pill speak.”

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 9:20 pm FamilyMan

      It’s arguable whether she loves it.

      It’s certain that she loves you if you do it.

      LikeLike


  20. on February 21, 2014 at 4:05 pm darkreaction

    The Dog Whisperer is a bizarre snipe considering his absolutely atrocious divorce rape that led to a suicide attempt.

    LikeLike


  21. on February 21, 2014 at 4:15 pm cultural marxist

    I could compile an art exhibition of all the strawmen in their “arguments”.

    (in response to CH’s 2/3rd rule)
    “And if she responds with one word, reply with a series of monosyllabic grunts or through miming. She thinks she’s got you in a box, but little does she know, it’s INVISIBLE. Treating every exchange with women like a manipulative math problem is ¾ stupid, ⅝ sad, and 100 percent guaranteed to make you into an ex variable.

    Also, did he just call my loins shallow?”

    They willingly ignored that CH said the rule was more like a general concept than a spergy calculation.

    LikeLike


  22. on February 21, 2014 at 4:26 pm Lash

    Today’s Washington Post Style section offers a new entry to Carolyn’s Greatest Hits.

    In today’s unbelievable (or all too believable) episode, a man is shamed for his fear that his promiscuous girlfriend will remain promiscuous…

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/carolyn-hax-she-says-shes-moved-beyond-her-past-infidelities-can-he-believe-her/2014/02/20/fce38c6c-8dc7-11e3-833c-33098f9e5267_story.html

    The obfuscating wordiness reminded me of her most astounding advice in memory, in which a…
    https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/washington-post-fembot-tells-cuckold-suck-it-up/

    LikeLike


  23. on February 21, 2014 at 4:35 pm Manic Beta

    Anyone see this Pulley broad that wrote the piece? A repulsive creature to be sure. I left a message asking why she felt the need to write an article about the given topic seeing as she was gross and no one wants to pump her anyhow.

    LikeLike


  24. on February 21, 2014 at 4:54 pm Xavier R

    Wtf…this c#nt has links to articles about sex toys, “transphobia” (horror!), queer lexicon and helping a shriveled 45 yr old menoharpie procure ‘anonymous sex” (something her f$g male readers know all about).

    All our so called mainstream so called media is all deviant, Israeli and misfit occupied territory…..

    LikeLike


  25. on February 21, 2014 at 5:04 pm thwack

    Been dropping the hammer on black academic simps and their white liberal sympathizers over on another blog:

    buddhuu

    @ thwack:

    You are a poisonous, nasty piece of work.
    —————————————————————————————————-

    Takes bow, blows kisses to crowd from balcony
    LOL

    Heavy moderation including deletions for something they call “mock ebonics”.

    Its interesting because you don’t even realize you used ebonics until they delete your comment?

    You guys must be putting a severe beatdown on simple niggers because now ni66ers have banned niggers from using ebonics?

    Dafuq?

    Thats all some ni66ers know?

    you guys livin rent free in ni66as skulls, kinda cramped ain’t it?

    (((SMMFH)))

    LikeLike


  26. on February 21, 2014 at 5:21 pm livingwell

    I cheated on a LTR. LTR found out. Got the best annal sex from LTR for weeks (she did not like annal before). Married said LTR for 22 years with zero issues. I provide the security, she provides the “home life”. End story. Happy in life.

    LikeLike


  27. on February 21, 2014 at 5:31 pm Reservoir Tip

    Latvian: “I’m dating someone”

    Me: “right”

    Her: “Just thought you should know”

    I ask how long and she says more than a year.

    We had been talking about the gross girls on campus with body hair and she said that didn’t bother her, so when she told me how long she was dating whoever I said, “someone’s gotta date the hairy legged girls. Ty for saving the pretty girls for me”

    Now, she never expressed interest in a relationship, and I didn’t either. She was up front about the “drinking buddies” thing, but I just call bullshit on it.

    More than a year and you’re going out with a guy on Tinder? Letting him touch you? Texting and calling, asking to hang out? Invited me over again today.

    Actions don’t quite match words here.

    I haven’t been clingy. There’s no jumping when she says to jump or anything like that.

    Crazy Eastern European stripper… Sorry to go on and on with this issue. My hamster is calmed and there are a few left in the kitty. I just think she’s pretty cool.

    LikeLike


  28. on February 21, 2014 at 5:32 pm Rollo Tomassi

    Point and sputter is all they have left.

    LikeLike


  29. on February 21, 2014 at 5:35 pm Holden Caulfield

    The negative reaction by feminist dipshits and associated asslickers is likely because the uncomfortable truths pointed out by CH and astute commenters force an honest self-assessment. Few women, especially the ugly ones, truly want a long hard (heh) look in the mirror regarding the facts about human behavior. Forcing them to confront biological differences produces the illogical backlash we laugh and shake our heads at. Arguing with a feminist is like arguing with a feral cat: you make a valid point, they respond with hissing and shrieking.

    I like that the CH site is being viewed by the masses. Getting some of these uncomfortable truths out in the open is going to be painful for exactly the people it should hurt. Thanks to CH for sharing that hilarious gnashing of teeth.

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 9:18 pm cortesar

      That is an absolutely necessary next step
      Good strides have been made in bypassing Cathedral grip over MSM in last 10 or more years thanks to WWW
      For instance, take the comment section of any MSM media and read it before it is censored and compare to the one of 10 years ago.
      Sometimes we do not appreciate enough how much has been done by blogs like this one.
      Let me paraphrase Victor Hugo
      ———————————————————————————————–
      You can fight against strong armies standing on you borders but you cannot fight an idea which time has come
      ———————————————————————————————–
      The time has come, they know it, they feel it, they fear it
      But they ain’t seen nothing yet

      LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 4:19 am l82dagame

        Amen. I truly believe things are coalescing in the right way to tear down feminism and political correctness. At some point, a critical mass will be reached and feminism will be as doomed, irrelevant and obscure as the KKK.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 3:16 pm Mofo

        Yep. I’m seeing it over and over again, even on brainless shit like Yahoo stories. It’s wildly different from even a year ago. Female supremacy is no longer unquestioned. The question is what happens now.

        LikeLike


  30. on February 21, 2014 at 5:50 pm cynthia

    It’s sort of funny. She’s decrying these tactics as ineffective, while she rises to their bait in the most pathetic way possible, using “but I’m sexy and pretty too!” as a defense. Almost as if… it works…

    LikeLike


  31. on February 21, 2014 at 5:53 pm tteclod

    Here are two positive comments for the Alternet article.

    1. After a side-by-side comparison, I am confident my time is best spent reading CH and ignoring Men’s Health.
    2. Never mind, I only had one.

    LikeLike


  32. on February 21, 2014 at 5:57 pm Arbiter

    A leftist homosexual who pretends it can tell women what they should want. Ridiculous. The Salon leftists exposed themselves as liars when they quickly took down the story once it was countered by Chateau Heartiste. Sheeple who first read the Salon’s piece and then went here would see the rebuttal, complete with scientific backing, and immediately see how ridiculous the leftist homosexual’s smear attempt was. Another victory for realism.

    Anna Pulley the Ugly writes extremely bad pieces, simply sticking to whatever is Politically Correct so she never has to prove anything she says. It is still really bad writing. For example, look at this:

    “Bisexual, for better or for worse, is what we have, but until and unless it can be wrested from the trenches of misinformation, stereotypes, and discrimination, I expect its downward trend to keep heading that way, in favor of different words, sentences, mish-mashes, and reconfigurations, the mutability of desire proving once again that it won’t be contained.

    Until then, I’m sticking with, “My heart is gay, but my vagina is less discriminatory.””

    Gasp! “misinformation,” “stereotypes,” “discrimination”. Oh, sure, homosexuals are so discriminated against, right? False. They are given a privileged position by the media owners. How many homosexuals are there in the Salon staff, and how many homo critics? Yeah, thought so.

    And who is dumb enough to write a phrase like “my vagina is less discriminatory”? What “woman” writes a phrase like that if she has any decency or self-respect? Does she even have enough intelligence to understand that she sounds like a retard?

    LikeLike


  33. on February 21, 2014 at 6:16 pm Tilikum

    protip:

    if you are gonna bang married broads, make sure they are mormons. crazy wild, hot as hell, and respond to dominance like nothing ive ever seen. just play the yareally non-judgmental card. freeeeeaaakkkks.

    LikeLike


  34. on February 21, 2014 at 6:26 pm Montgomery Draxel (@MDraxel)

    “Treating every exchange with women like a manipulative math problem is ¾ stupid, ⅝ sad, and 100 percent guaranteed to make you into an ex variable.”

    I’m 2/3rds certain she was furiously flicking her grizzle whilst replying to your site.

    LikeLike


  35. on February 21, 2014 at 6:53 pm Cauthon

    That last paragraph was devastating. Any feminist reading it must feel like William Wallace in the last scene of Braveheart.

    LikeLike


    • on February 23, 2014 at 8:08 am quorasdesignatedasshole

      Wallace died for a cause. He chose it. You’re insulting him.

      LikeLike


  36. on February 21, 2014 at 7:17 pm Director

    Cow, just cow!

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 8:19 pm sciences with lispses

      She’s not fat, but her future will increasingly become meow, just meow.

      LikeLike


      • on February 23, 2014 at 11:16 am corvinus

        If it isn’t already right meow.

        LikeLike


  37. on February 21, 2014 at 7:27 pm bigdickeddeadgordon

    These people live in a fairy tale world where the natures of men and women are identical. The idea of men needing advice because women differ so markedly is enough to anger them. But when you go further and imply that women are essentially masochistic and naturally subservient, as is done in most of the axioms they quoted, steam shoots out their ears.

    Sadly (for them), their worst fears are confirmed when a shitty novel like 50 Shades of Grey sparks a worldwide lady-fapping epidemic. I haven’t read the loathsome book, but from the 500,000 articles written about it I understand it’s about a billionaire who tortures a sweet young virgin (say what you want about men, their apparent perversion, and their porn collections, but, serial killers excluded, we aren’t pulling pud to torture).

    The lady author inadvertently highlights a difference between the sexes when she includes men in her statement about people wanting their partners to be desirable to others. Personally, I would want all the men around me to think my girlfriend was a dog; then I’d know they wouldn’t pursue her. Unless I surround myself with unhealthies, however, that is unlikely to happen. She does herself position further harm by saying the don’t-call-for-3-days rule is good in that it prevents you from looking overeager. If a man thought a woman was hot, he would love her to be overeager. By contrast, a man will lose a degree of hotness in a woman’s eyes if he is overeager.

    Feminists are the ones who crave alpha cock the most. This article may have just been a way to bring herself to alpha attention. She probably fantasises about being your sex slave, Heartiste.

    LikeLike


  38. on February 21, 2014 at 7:46 pm yule

    obviously all this exposure means the great laws like the 2/3 is being exposed slowly to the female masses. But I guess this was all inevitable.

    Plus a CH vs lamestream media fight sounds more enticing, as ROK is all over the place with less bite.

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 8:24 pm walawala

      @yule “exposing” the laws to female masses doesn’t matter to them. Women aren’t logical. I’ve explained attraction and game to girls in terms of evolutionary psychology. They don’t understand it. They are more sensing and feeling rather than intuitive. You can explain it and they may believe that they cannot be seduced, then suddenly you neg them, push-pull and it’s like a cat with a ball of yarn….they just play along. They can’t help themselves. The more self-aware women will say “grow a pair”…the less self-aware will just know why they don’t find a guy attractive.

      LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 10:09 pm FamilyMan

        Red-pill consists of
        (1) exposure of true cause-and-effect in what women react to, and
        (2) logical reactions / strategies responding to the new information in (1).

        Sites like CH provide true cause-and-effect in what men like us will do. We are quite honest. We are not lying to women who post here or any other women who read us. We have no shame, we’re proud of it.

        So the women should logically plan THEIR counter move. Where is it? There’s nothing but bitching and moaning.

        WGTOW? Not a bit of it. They don’t embrace spinsterism, they bitch whenever we mention their risk of it and our lack of further interest in protecting them from it.

        Ladies, it’s your move.

        Let me suggest: become more feminine and honest, and grab a good man young and hold onto him. I think that will work.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 6:44 am Kate

        “Ladies, it’s your move.”

        Now where have I heard that before? 🙂

        http://www.amazon.com/Its-Your-Move-Play-Game/dp/1609413989

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 6:45 am Kate

        Dang. Sorry, CH, I didn’t realize it was going to come up that way.

        LikeLike


  39. on February 21, 2014 at 8:08 pm walawala

    The more I read about game and also put the ideas into practice the more I realize that stories like the OP come from a place where there is a clear misunderstanding or lack of knowledge of Evolutionary Psychology.

    When I’m gaming girls, after sparking attraction and we’re playing the Questions Game: she asks me something, I ask her something, I will ask her “Do you know the 3 elements of attraction?” It’s fascinating, they never answer correctly. It’s always “Good looking?” or they fumble around.

    When I go through it: Leader of men, protector of women and children, pre-selected by other women—they ALL get it.

    Logically that doesn’t make sense but when you understand the triggers and where it comes from it’s obvious.

    The last part “Pre-selected” is an element but of course it depends on a combination of the other 2. The push-pull of the neg etc etc.

    Also, there is a huge misunderstanding that game is just to bang tons of chicks while the concept of “inner game” is ignored in those mainstream or feminist pieces.

    I prefer to talk about game with people who are genuinely interested in its principles or have stories or questions to share. Stories like the Salon one are a way of shaming betas into submission. “I’m not like THOSE chauvinistic jerks…” Stories like that lead to disappointment on both sides: women complain men aren’t masculine enough and guys complain women are too “picky”.

    Becoming game-savvy has made me very self-aware of both my strengths and where I need to improve. I now can pick out the dynamic of an interaction from across a room and process it with what I reckon is 95% accuracy.

    I’m now banging a girl who when I initially met her was claiming she was religious and was saving sex for a serious relationship, didn’t give blow-jobs because they were “dirty”. Now she’s cooking for me, wearing lingiere or sexy stuff every time we go out, up for banging in every which way—in other words she wants to be lead.

    My now ex gf who I’ve written extensively about here and who I had terrible one-it is for but who I finally spotted as a liar, manipulator and cheat and called her out on more than a month ago is now coming out again to my weekly social circle parties. She very transparently openly flirts with other guys doing the very things she used to complain to me I did. Without the insights of game and the feedback from guys like YaReally and other I would have been completely confused and lost about what exactly was going on.

    Articles like this only serve to further chip away at male self-confidence and discourage pursuit of male self-awareness.

    LikeLike


  40. on February 21, 2014 at 8:21 pm walawala

    I posted this earlier but think it’s worth a post itself. It’s an interesting companion piece to the Salon article.

    For me becoming game-savvy in Asia presents an added dimension. There is also this underlying theme or myth that Asian women are submissive or perhaps they don’t respond to game or that they are averse to sex or being sexy—all of which is nonsense and usually comes from guys who don’t understand game. Asian women are no different than any other women. They respond to game the same way all women do. There are a few things that I think may be unique.

    One thing I do think works better on Asian women which needs to be calibrated is calling them out on their lies and bullshit. This is not something that is usually advocated in game because it is deemed beta. But calibration is key.

    I’ve noticed than when I don’t call women out on their lies or bullshit they tend to think of my silence as acceptance. When I call them out on whatever it was they did—they sulk and push-back but longer term respect it.

    The last line about “man-wives” needing to grow a pair supports my premise. Again blowing up from a position of alpha and not being afraid to lose the girl is vital. Blowing up and begging for forgiveness—beta.

    http://travel.cnn.com/singapore/life/opinion-why-singapore-men-suck-323414?page=1

    LikeLike


    • on February 21, 2014 at 10:04 pm FamilyMan

      Sheesh, is that a typical female view in Singapore? She’s not asking for more of a certain type of men, she is rejecting all the available men (1) CBD alpha males, (2) male “house-drones” that don’t make her tingle, and (3) traditional chinese men.

      I predict she’ll end up with (4) cats.

      LikeLike


      • on February 21, 2014 at 10:14 pm walawala

        @Family Man this was written by a Singaporean but it also applies in Hong Kong, mainland China, Taiwan. Men are betacized, they carry stuff for girls, etc etc.

        But what is interesting is the last line. The girl wants guys to “man up” but at the same time there is a smug satisfaction that they don’t. This in some way rationalizes her own insecurities about getting involved in a relationship.

        The idea that she’s better than all that means she never has to get involved and she can then justify it by saying “All men here are wimps”.

        If you agree with the premise you’re submitting to her frame.

        I see girls here all the time with this same attitude creating a male harem of eunich orbiters: guys who will rush out to have lunch or dinner or be their dance partners or text partners.

        In my case I have often intense sexual relationships with these girls and we end up breaking up because their shit-testing and manipulation usually pushes things over the line: they will opening flirt with guys in front of me. I will get angry. They will apologize and eventually I will leave. Then they will be extremely sorry but it’s too late.

        One girl I went out with years ago did this. I later told her I broke up with her because she had taken a guy’s number. She told me “I only did this to make you jealous because you weren’t giving me enough attention.”

        After we broke up we banged once then for years she would call me up at regular intervals crying over losing me or send me long love letters about how she mistreated me and every year I get a birthday present and Christmas present—even if I was seeing someone else.

        LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 4:52 am Glengarry

      Though that Ong woman seems to have arrived from, say, the National States of America.

      “… but after a lifetime living overseas, a girl can get pretty accustomed to some good chat. This elusive creature is almost non-existent in Singapore, save for a specific demographic of guys who know how to make a conversation tick.

      … the debate-happy side of me got slightly carried away in a conversation about music, and a guy actually said: “Um … are you just like this? All the time?”

      Uh, yes. It’s called talking, and besides being a very telling extension of your personality, the rest of the civilized world seems to think it’s a great way of getting to know someone.”

      Shall we guess that … talking … meant “witty banter”, perhaps with a side of screaming and eye-rolling?

      Well, Alexis, actually I think he did get to know you, and to a satisfactory degree.

      LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 6:01 pm driveallnight

        She cheerfully admits that she “got slightly carried away” but then still proceeds to bitch about being called out on her behavior. Then the guy negs her about it (“Are you always like this?”), and she’s *still*qualifying in response to his neg as her article goes to print.

        Outstanding.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 8:42 pm walawala

        @driveallnight

        Yes it shows how utterly lacking in self-awareness women are.

        I think women are actually “naturals” at gaming guys but they have no clue what they’re doing or why certain game tactics prompt certain reactions in them.

        Her hamster is spinning at the “Are you always like this?” neg. But she’s otherwise quick to dismss “man-wives”.

        The article validates most of what we talk about here and shows there is no “American” game, there’s just game.

        LikeLike


  41. on February 21, 2014 at 10:33 pm Rum

    It has occurred to me that better parts of the Dark Enlightenment, for example, the Elders of CH, are nowadays marching un-opposed carrying axes straight at the naked and exposed roots of the un-natural growth called feminism.
    I say un-opposed because the would be defenders of the roots do not and probably cannot understand the DE.
    Even in day-light, even after repeated teachings even after crying tears of agony.

    LikeLike


  42. on February 22, 2014 at 1:32 am Ronin

    All that bluster,

    And yet you know the one true thing that screwy broad wants is enough SMV to get gamed & banged-out by Evil Stifler.

    LikeLike


  43. on February 22, 2014 at 2:31 am Mike

    “Women should avoid trying to be funny altogether and stick to maximizing the return on their authentically valuable assets. That would be your tits, ass, face and pussy, in case you were wondering.”

    Actually non-feminist women who aren’t afraid to poke fun at themselves can be funny.

    LikeLike


  44. on February 22, 2014 at 3:20 am Daily Linkage – February 22, 2014 | The Dark Enlightenment

    […] Salon Discovers Chateau Heartiste, Angry Menstruation Flows On Cue | Chateau Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  45. on February 22, 2014 at 4:29 am Glengarry

    “Treating every exchange with women like a manipulative math problem is ¾ stupid, ⅝ sad, and 100 percent guaranteed to make you into an ex variable.”

    You’re different, baby. I wouldn’t do that to you.

    LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 11:39 am Greg Eliot

      Hell, she’s still trying to add up 3/4 and 5/8 and convert it to a percentage.

      LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 2:29 pm Glengarry

        It’s 3+4+5+8+// = 30 percent, duh.

        LikeLike


  46. on February 22, 2014 at 4:44 am Glengarry

    “Brief Bio: Anna writes a weekly sex advice column for the Chicago Tribune’s RedEye, despite having sex about four times a year. ”

    She’s a youngish non-shamu short-hair bisexual who has sex four times a year. Her latest work was apparently discussing how to label lesbians, such a worthy political project by the way. That makes me think she’s actually sexually undeveloped, possibly preorgasmic.

    LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 5:54 am Hugh G. Rection

      It’s a fair warning to the reader that nothing she says should be taken serious.

      LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 6:50 am Kate

      Women can be incels too…

      LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 2:33 pm Glengarry

        Doesn’t look old enough to be incel though.

        LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 2:47 pm Kate

        I don’t think its age related.

        LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 8:36 am martin

      Why is she telling her readers personal details about her sex life in this gratuitous way? Has she no pride in herself?

      LikeLike


  47. on February 22, 2014 at 4:44 am Gil

    Is it me or was the non-C.H. advice retarded?

    LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 8:21 am Hugh Mann

      It was. Reminds me never to buy Mens Health.

      LikeLike


  48. on February 22, 2014 at 5:45 am Mr.C

    Seeing this article in the Australian mainstream media surprised me a little.

    http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/no-sex-please-were-equals-20140217-32umo.html

    LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 5:36 pm Mr Meaner

      Especially the Fairfax media….

      LikeLike


    • on February 23, 2014 at 1:18 am blogster

      Yeah, Lori Gottlieb is off the reservation as far as Australian feminists are concerned. If you recall, she was the one that told women to look for Mr Pretty Good instead of Mr Perfect. Her and Bettina Arndt usually get a few token pieces a year in The Age or the Herald Sun only to be howled down for pointing out the obvious based on verifiable facts, data and statistics AND logic.

      LikeLike


  49. on February 22, 2014 at 6:17 am Anonymous

    I agree with and do probably 90% of what is written here in Chateau.

    Why?

    Because it WORKS, and I fuck more women because of this behavior!

    It’s just that simple!

    LikeLike


  50. on February 22, 2014 at 8:56 am Robert

    Congrats to you! It’s all good. It is very unusual for them, I suspect, to read anything outside the echo chamber. They know you write the real thing, but they cannot consciously admit it to themselves.

    LikeLike


  51. on February 22, 2014 at 9:20 am Newbie

    eh eh lol

    Well done CH

    LikeLike


  52. on February 22, 2014 at 9:32 am Sam Spade

    The more feminist nonsense I read, the closer I am to moving to South America. I’m sure there are feminists down there too, but I’m burning out quickly on this tired, vapid culture in the Estados Unidos. I’ve been to SA a few times and people (women) seem less caught up in all this. Also, their mouths are not nearly as filthy. Even (especially?) when writing an online diatribe, an American feminist cannot help but dispense with a hail of f-bombs. I guess I’ve developed a taste for finer things.

    LikeLike


  53. on February 22, 2014 at 9:50 am Hearst

    Excellent article on the situation in Switzerland:
    http://whiterabbitradio.net/eu-hates-democracy-for-white-countries#comment-5233

    LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 12:24 pm Hilary Clinton

      ..

      LikeLike


  54. on February 22, 2014 at 10:14 am CAPSLOCK HUSTLA

    SHE REJECTS THE CH SEX TIPS AND YET SHE LITERALLY TURNED HER LESBIAN FIANCE STRAIGHT. THAT’S SOME NUCLEAR HAMSTERIN’.

    “I proposed to my last girlfriend in Lesvos, Greece, at sunset, overlooking the craggy shores of Skala Eresou. I carried the ring 8,000 miles. I wasn’t eloquent, but she cried and I cried and as we walked back to our rented house, we played a game where we guessed the number of stray cats we’d see along the way. We said the loser had to kiss the winner a million times.

    Shortly after that, we moved to San Francisco. Shortly after that, I was on a different shore and she was on a boat drifting farther away from me each day. Shortly after that, we stopped having sex. Words were somewhere in the absence growing between us but I couldn’t find them. My only weapon was repetition. I made us dinner. We watched “Glee.” We went to yoga. Shortly after that, she told me she wanted to date men, that our relationship was over.”

    http://www.salon.com/2012/03/01/san_francisco_turned_me_straight/

    LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 12:42 pm how I roll

      Seems like she loves the phrase “shortly after that”.

      LikeLike


      • on February 22, 2014 at 1:23 pm Reservoir Tip

        I’ve always thought repetition was a pretty weak tool to use in writing.

        While it’s used to add effect, it almost always falls flat.

        Remember that spiel Judge Napolitano gave on FOX that got him the boot? That’s what comes to mind. Good food for thought on his part, but the repetition killed it for me and made the whole thing feel old pretty quickly.

        LikeLike


  55. on February 22, 2014 at 10:42 am kaizersoze71

    As they say, there is no such thing as bad advertising. You probably got a million new beta boys following now. Finally this is starting to gain momentum.

    LikeLike


  56. on February 22, 2014 at 11:17 am gumby

    lawyercunt barbie- the nail in the coffin?

    http://elitedaily.com/women/barbie-is-now-an-entrepreneur-equipped-with-a-smartphone-and-tablet-video/

    LikeLike


  57. on February 22, 2014 at 11:51 am Emma the Emo

    That’s kinda why I’m glad I wasn’t on the internet in my teens. Say something stupid in real life, people can forget it (or you can pretend you never said it and there is no proof). But internet will document your mistakes forever.

    LikeLike


  58. on February 22, 2014 at 12:23 pm whorefinder

    lol at this cunt trying to attack the truth.

    Here’s hoping she meets a pack of “Obama’s sons” late one night in a back alley and they treat to a wonderful trip down diversity lane. Trayvon’s brothers are always so … civilized.

    No doubt she’ll blame that nonconsensual train-running gangbang on the white man. Maybe even George Zimmerman. Heck, probably even me. ha.

    Rape!

    LikeLike


  59. on February 22, 2014 at 1:25 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    LikeLike


    • on February 25, 2014 at 3:22 pm FuriousFerret

      She looks like Thom Yorke.

      LikeLike


  60. on February 22, 2014 at 3:58 pm Theodore Logan

    That last paragraph reminds me of that Pinhead quote from Hell Raiser:
    “I am going to enjoy tormenting you, and I will enjoy making you enjoy it.”

    LikeLike


    • on February 22, 2014 at 9:18 pm Mr.C

      Who knows, with enough tormenting/trolling, something like this may eventuate.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Dawson

      http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity/charlotte-dawson-found-dead-20140222-338j6.html

      LikeLike


  61. on February 22, 2014 at 7:23 pm Dave

    Seriously, why do you use the word ‘shiv’ so obnoxiously much?
    You’re like a feminist with their patented jargon, ie overdoing it.
    We get it, your wisdom is like a SHIV to the feminist ego, let it go!

    [CH: Branding. (double entendre intended)]

    LikeLike


    • on February 23, 2014 at 8:07 am quorasdesignatedasshole

      Awww…. does “shivving” shiv you?

      LikeLike


      • on February 24, 2014 at 2:54 am Dave

        Very much so. CH posts need an overwrought-jargon trigger waring now!

        Get it, cause ‘trigger warning’ is itself an example of… ah, never mind.

        LikeLike


    • on February 23, 2014 at 10:26 pm Ryan Vann

      Repetition of a point is a key to winning a war on minds, hence why feminists chant their heter-normative and absurd terms like mantras.

      LikeLike


      • on February 24, 2014 at 2:49 am Dave

        If you’re an evangelical, frothing-at-the-mouth demagogue like feminist are, it might be.
        But I thought CH was a purveyor of rational truth instead of a deluded ideologue? Or is that the use-their-own-tactics-against-them-bullshit?

        LikeLike


  62. on February 23, 2014 at 10:00 am treef

    Or it could be because you just delete any contrary comments here, haha.

    LikeLike


    • on February 23, 2014 at 7:38 pm Gro Haila

      So the smear-direction shifts.

      LikeLike


  63. on February 24, 2014 at 3:54 pm bealady101

    Just curious, if this guy is so busy getting laid then how does he have the time to write all of this nonsense?

    [CH: Just curious, why do you look like a 12 year old boy?]

    LikeLike


    • on February 25, 2014 at 6:47 am bealady101

      Awww, CH, you are so adorable when you use your little “tactics”! It’s a little weird, but I’m willing to look past it.

      Anyhoo, carry on writing your articles. Everyone needs something to fill all that spare time, right? 😉

      LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 11:24 am Anonymous

        Obvious shaming tactic is obvious. Can’t you be a little more subtle? Hot girls are usually better at this. Maybe your picture makes you look better than you are.

        Anyhoo everyone needs something filled now and then don’t they?

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 11:36 am bealady101

        Obvious shaming tactic is meant to be obvious. Being subtle defeats the purpose of being obvious.

        Listen, dudes, maybe I have just encountered overly obvious, extraordinarily disingenuous, obnoxious asshole “alpha males”, but all of the men that I have been most attracted to in life have had enormous self-confidence, obvious intelligence, and respect for both themselves and those around them. They talked to me and everyone else like human beings, not like robots that respond to saying just the right thing. Tactics like “negging” come off as suspicious, and girls who have options don’t go for anyone who comes off as slightly suspicious.

        The problem with both this and the “beta dudes” you guys are trying to reform is that both groups aren’t being human. It’s two different kinds of woman worship: one where you obsess over how to manipulate her into doing what you want and one where you assume that sex is a reward for good behavior and come off as creepy and weird. True “alpha males” I’ve known would laugh at the thought that they need 16 rules for wooing a girl. They can do it just by being themselves. And man is that hott.

        Anyway, that’s my free advice. Hope everyone here gets what they are after. 😉

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 12:37 pm FuriousFerret

        You wrote all that say that you like guys that already possess high value traits and don’t like guys that try to learn to be that way.

        Well no shit. LOL.

        It’s like men saying that would like a hot girl that’s never ever been fat. No duh.

        Let’s reverse your whole little rant here:

        “Listen, chicks, maybe I have just encountered girls trying to make themselves look thinner and try to hard to pretend they are hotter than they are “hot chicks”, but all of the women that I have been most attracted to in life have had nice thin bodies, a good rack, and a good pert ass no pancake butt . They had fit bodies and didn’t have to obsess about not eating junk food and making a difficult effort to go to the gym because they had a very healthy lifestyle that they liked to do.Tactics like push up bras, covering acne with makeup and wearing slimming clothes come off as suspicious, and men who have options don’t go for anyone who comes off as slightly suspicious.
        ”

        I left out the last paragraph though because unlike girls we always welcome unattractive fat women losing weight and entering the promise land. The more the merrier. Whereas women throw up at the thought of beta males becoming high value because then they might accidently fuck one of them.

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 12:43 pm bealady101

        Not at all. I fully support men gaining confidence, self-respect, and a strong identity. They don’t need manipulative tactics when they gain all of these things. I throw up at the obvious digs into another human being’s worth and identity.

        I’ve encountered more than one PUA aficionado,

        [CH: #coolstorybro]

        and found them all laughable.

        [You got dumped. It’s ok, heartache is a part of life.]

        Some that I was attracted to before they opened their mouth. Le sigh.

        [Lesson: Male personality trumps male looks.]

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 1:02 pm FuriousFerret

        “Not at all. I fully support men gaining confidence, self-respect, and a strong identity. They don’t need manipulative tactics when they gain all of these things. I throw up at the obvious digs into another human being’s worth and identity. ”

        No you don’t. You fully support men gaining, self respect and a strong identity on YOUR OWN TERMS. The same terms that have fucked these same men to begin with. It’s a catch 22.

        To become the men that are attractive they have to do and think things that you find offensive. You just want to eat the sausage, you don’t want to see how it’s made.

        It’s the same with guys saying that they don’t like a girl with makeup. They like natural beauty and you know it’s bullshit because what they are saying is they want a girl that looks like she wears makeup without wearing makeup. It’s just dumb.

        “I’ve encountered more than one PUA aficionado, and found them all laughable. Some that I was attracted to before they opened their mouth. Le sigh. ”

        Everyone starts somewhere. It’s like saying I’ve encountered more than one newbie at the gym and he wasn’t jacked so lifting weights doesn’t work.

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 1:10 pm bealady101

        It’s ok, CH, sometimes definitions are hard. Laughing is something people do when something is funny. Getting dumped isn’t funny.

        And I know it’s hard. I’m sorry you guys have to go through all of this trouble just to *try* to keep it from happening to you….

        [CH: Mental mediocrities like yourself should avoid trying to be funny and just focus on getting male attention the old-fashioned way: you know, lotsa cleavage, short skirts and knowing when the time is right to shut up and look cute.]

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 1:18 pm bealady101

        @FuriousFerret I do *not* want it on my terms. There is an underlying element of truth here that gets lost in all the “game-playing”. Having a strong sense of self is very attractive. That means not a self that I tell you to have. Not a self that I always approve of. Your own identity.

        However, when you resort to manipulation then you are still missing that sense of personal autonomy. You are altering the way you would naturally interact as a human sans all of your insecurities and replacing it with a bunch of rules that may very well have temporary success, but result in long term harm to both you and your partner. You are saying that seducing a woman is more important than being genuine.

        Learn to be a genuine human.

        [CH: “Just be yourself.”]

        Don’t pander like a “beta” and don’t manipulate like an “alpha”.

        [But if you have to choose, choose alpha manipulation. Women are more likely to spread their legs for the latter.]

        That’s all I’m saying.

        [We know.]

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 1:21 pm bealady101

        Man, I’m getting so much comment action from CH.

        [CH: …said the cat toy to the cat.]

        It’s like a dream come true!

        [I bet.]

        Wow, I’ve never wanted anything more.

        [You’re free to leave this blog at any time.]

        And just to think: he think’s I’m mediocre.

        [That’s where the evidence is pointing.]

        Like, that’s one step up from ditzy.

        [So I’m saying you have a chance.]

        Hope I don’t get any negative points for that. I would go home and cry. 😦

        [We’ll see if you redeem yourself.]

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 1:37 pm bealady101

        I’m having too much fun to leave now, CH.

        [CH: Translation: She got the fever for the flavor of a tingle.]

        You know, if all the other men in the world died and I had to pick between you five I would choose Furious Ferret.

        [My heart will go on.]

        Why? He is the only one who has engaged in legitimate conversation thus far instead of sideways insults.

        [Pity party or sexual manipulation, which one will she choose? Ah, why not both!]

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 1:51 pm FuriousFerret

        @bealady101

        You have a very mannish jawline, you’re ugly and you probably smell bad. You should just thank God that blonde inflation exists.

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 1:59 pm bealady101

        @FuriousFerret Whew! Thank God I have at least something to attract you. I wouldn’t know how to go on otherwise….

        [CH: You’re really worried that men won’t find you attractive. Understandable. It’s your female nature.]

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 2:06 pm FuriousFerret

        “Whew! Thank God I have at least something to attract you. I wouldn’t know how to go on otherwise….”

        Wrong again. Blonde inflation only works on non fair featured/skinned guys that have a scarcity mentality about it.

        Nordics can see the actual plain jane you that exists behind the blue/blonde combo that you fool others with.

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 2:21 pm bealady101

        Haha @CH and @FuriousFerret, the man that matters finds me irresistible and that is good enough for me. To each his own, carry on.

        I don’t much care for geometric, purple men either, to put it bluntly….

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 2:48 pm FuriousFerret

        Just one last thing, I looked at your pics, and you are going to be quite the fattie in about five years. You know that is true too. Don’t even dare to pretend you aren’t headed for fattie status in the near future.

        When that happens, goodbye value to society.

        Just to show I’m a good guy I’ll help you out a little bit:

        http://www.marksdailyapple.com

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 2:53 pm bealady101

        LOL! You boys make me giggle.

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 12:59 pm Anonymous

        wall of text, no doubt hamster spinning.

        TLDR.

        wish u all the best.

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 1:13 pm bealady101

        No doubt, that’s what one would come to expect on the internet.

        Toodles!

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 11:38 am bealady101

        And PS- Your tactics aren’t so subtle either.

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 12:19 pm Joachim Peiper

        That’s what they all say.

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 1:34 pm greginaurora

        Hello “Be A Lady 101”,

        Brief note: behaving in a ladylike manner does not include engaging in mean-spirited snarkiness with strangers. Perhaps you should change the name of your website to “Bitter Broads”.

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 1:39 pm bealady101

        Thank you for the advice. While I sometimes agree with you that peacemaking is the best option, on occasion I like to fight fire with fire. As in: mean-spirited snarkiness gets returned with snarkiness. A fair point gets a fair point in return.

        [CH: For the record, since it is in the nature of cunty drive-bys like yourself to muddy the origins of internet battles in an appeal to martyrdom, you came to this board and spouted shit from the get-go. Had you arrived with the proper deference and humility to learn new ideas, you would have been treated better. But you didn’t, so you aren’t.]

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 1:57 pm bealady101

        Dear CH,

        Well, to be fair, these aren’t quite new ideas to me.

        [CH: So you have a lot of experience dating men with game.]

        I have read about them, had them fully explained, and witnessed them in action.

        [“Action”. heh]

        I can’t hate on someone for trying to get laid and free themselves from the obnoxious constraints society puts on them.

        [Society’s got nothing to do with it. Immutable biological sex differences shape male and female romantic behavior.]

        I can hate on someone for using belittling and manipulative tactics.

        [False premise. You lied when you said you had game tactics fully explained to you. Unless you meant you had them fully explained to you by a mewling manboob or a shrike feminist.]

        And I’m no martyr.

        [You just play on the internet.]

        I would sincerely regret it if I portrayed that message.

        [Pray for your salvation.]

        Besides, you are out preaching the opposite of deference.

        [Context matters. But you know that.]

        Don’t expect it from me just because you signed up for a WordPress account.

        [Correction: I don’t “expect” deference from anyone, but I do expect them to understand that there are consequences to barging in here like an ill-informed dolt and mouthing off. If this bothers you, leave.]

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 2:32 pm bealady101

        Not bothered. Making the sign of the cross as we speak!

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 2:07 pm greginaurora

        The dominant theme of this Chateau has something in common with where you appear to be going with your own website, that being self improvement. You’ve come in by one post which is highly critical of Feminism and a blogger with obvious emotional and sexual issues. To better understand the site and those who choose to read it, you would do better to begin from the position that gets reinforced constantly throughout the manosphere: game begins from within and requires that the individual man know his weaknesses, build his strengths, and recognize the world for how it really is, not how he wants it to be. If you read through you’ll find a wealth of advice for men in relationships, who want to keep their women happy with them. Because they love their women. Game gets a bad rap because of the suggestion that women can be tricked into sex; fair enough. It works anyway, regardless of opinion. But it is not limited to talking 25 year old girls out of their panties. It’s also magnificent in maintaining healthy happy relationships between couples who love each other. Why? Because it teaches men to behave like Men. This is the beef we have with Feminism. Men and women are not the same, and shaming men for not behaving like women is ultimately destructive. Who else is telling men how to behave like Men? The blogger linked above describes fucking men in the ass with a strapon in one of her published articles. Do you think she knows anything at all about how men should behave? She certainly doesn’t know anything about how a lady should behave.

        There are guys here only interested in getting laid. There are others of us who just want to understand women. Here’s the thing: the advice here works. The Lefty stuff produces uniform failure. If a man wants to be a Man and have a successful relationship with a Woman, he would do well to take the advice offered here and elsewhere around manosphere.

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 2:29 pm bealady101

        Fair points, greg. Somewhere in this mess of comments I said that I agree with the underlying premise that having a strong personal identity is not only attractive, but beneficial for the individual. I just disagree with some of the methods.

        It’s very possible that I have only met bad, annoying, and overly obvious gamers before and interpreted what I have read here accordingly. However, reading all of the comments on these posts has rather confirmed my opinion that PUA boys are trying to get laid by playing on the insecurities of unsuspecting women. Additionally, when they criticize females they then claim we lack the self-awareness to realize it. Rather circular…..

        My experience is that being authentic attracts those who value you for your individual nuances, which leads to greater happiness for everyone. Am I wrong in my impression that “game” is inauthentic?

        LikeLike


      • on February 25, 2014 at 2:54 pm darkhorseforever

        @bealady

        Most of the men on this site, learning game etc, are here simply because they don’t get laid regularly. They suck with women. Their way of socializing with the opposite sex needs improvement. So you are upset with the way some of the commenters are interacting with you, but are at the same time mocking precepts that were they able to master, would likely lead to interactions you would prefer. There are a few guys on this site who legitimately understand social dynamics as they relate to the mating game and are able to pull women, but most are learning.

        LikeLike


  64. on February 25, 2014 at 3:09 pm Amy

    @bealady: “My experience is that being authentic attracts those who value you for your individual nuances, which leads to greater happiness for everyone. Am I wrong in my impression that “game” is inauthentic?”

    Game is a tool for improving attraction from the opposite sex. Bad game looks like game; good game is effortless confidence and charisma. Who cares if the guy was born with it or learned it?

    You’re using authenticity as a code word for confidence/assurance, which is really what you value. A stammering nerdy guy is authentic, but are you attracted to him? No indeed, you’re not.

    LikeLike


    • on February 25, 2014 at 3:27 pm bealady101

      One can be confident and not authentic. I do not find that attractive either.

      A stammering nerdy guy is not authentic. He allows his fear to alter him.

      LikeLike


  65. on February 25, 2014 at 4:03 pm greginaurora

    There’s a period of time in which a man un-learning what he has been taught and learning Game is clumsy. Oafish. He’s not certain of what he’s doing, and the results are obvious. Sometimes embarrassing. If you’re new to this, you’ll see a number of references to red pill/blue pill. The understanding is black and white, but changing how you think is complex and difficult.

    So we all try something that produces results: fake it till you make it. To broaden the concept, these men will set an abstract goal with concrete measurements, and aim for that goal. And fail. And fail again. And fail again. And with each failure, they learn something about themselves and how people interact with each other.

    It’s something maybe you don’t grasp, but men have been taught to keep quiet and be meek. Women have GRRL POWER. Men have ADHD. To recognize this and change how we think, away from Leftist hatred of individuality and toward the simple manly virtues of boldness, assertiveness, and confidence, DOES require a period of time in which a man needs to experiment and try. He fails. But he doesn’t quit; he learns, and he grows.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Mabui on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    cortesar on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain John Charity… on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Dread Forman on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hivemind Is Real
    • Manifest Depravity
    • The Diminishing Returns Of Anti-White Virtue Signaling
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Revolutionary Spirals To Civil War 2
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: