Commenter “H” passes along a quote from J. D. Unwin,
CH have you heard of J. D. Unwin? From wikipedia page: In Sex and Culture (1934), Unwin studied 80 primitive tribes and 6 known civilizations through 5,000 years of history and found a positive correlation between the cultural achievement of a people and the sexual restraint they observe….According to Unwin, after a nation becomes prosperous it becomes increasingly liberal with regard to sexual morality and as a result loses it cohesion, its impetus and its purpose. The process, says the author, is irreversible:
“The whole of human history does not contain a single instance of a group becoming civilized unless it has been absolutely monogamous, nor is there any example of a group retaining its culture after it has adopted less rigorous customs.”
Unleashed female sexuality is great fun… while poolside lasts. But then a price must be paid, and that price is nothing less than civilization. Why are women primarily to blame? Because as the sexual gatekeepers, their lack of restraint is more destabilizing to societal prosperity. The female sex is, despite cultural pabulum to the contrary, the wilder sex.
Tragically (and this is one instance when the word tragic correctly applies), it would seem shining civilizations are doomed to eat and screw themselves to oblivion. Restraint — i.e., devotion to the gods of the copybook headings — leads to prosperity. Prosperity leads to liberality. Liberality leads to disintegration.
One can as successfully stop this civilizational cycle as one can stop the cycle of tides. So, you may as well clink a glass and enjoy the time you’ve got here.

See Alexander Tytler’s cycle of civilization.
LikeLike
A blog about getting laid is the most profoundly conservative thing I am able to read daily… If that’s not a sign of the apocalypse, I don’t know what is.
LikeLike
Prep, prep, prep.
.308/7.62, 12-gauge, 22LR, potable water, antibiotics, can openers, toilet paper…
LikeLike
maybe most people know but for antibiotics: fish antibiotics are made in the same factories, in same doses as our common dosages because they’re dissolved in gallons of water. they are legal to stockpile. look for fish-mox, fish-cillin, etc.
or if you get syphilis and are ashamed.
LikeLike
Also: find out who your neighbors are, what they’ve got and how much, who your local allies/opponents might be, etc. Warlording in America.
LikeLike
Bottles of Single Malt Whiskey for bribing thugs at roadblocks.
Assuming you’d rather not waste any ammunition on them.
LikeLike
I’d rather waste ammunition on those government mofos [pour encourager les autres] than spend a single dollar on single malt for them. They’ll be happy with blended.
LikeLike
LOL’ed.
LikeLike
Thugs can have my still’s foreshots and feints.
LikeLike
When you really think about it, that stuff gets you through the first wave if you’re lucky, but in the long run we’re heading straight from the peak of civilization all the way back to being hunter gatherers on foot.
It will take a long time to breed up the numbers of horses and draft animals. Most of the skills people used to have at the turn of the last century are long forgotten. Everybody depends on electricity and gasoline now.
Oh well, look me up. I have 18th century woodworking tools, and I know how to use all that shit.
LikeLike
fucking brilliant, I think the same thing when I read these pages
LikeLike
The ability to approach women and maximize your options is a tool for you to use as you wish. I think most men would be happy marrying an attractive woman with a good personality and wise opinions, but you have to be able to find and woo her, or see her lost to someone else. You don’t have to move from one woman to the next forever; when you find one you want to keep, there is nothing that says you can’t stop there. But you have no way of knowing who to keep if you don’t first move from one to the other, weighing your options. And there is nothing wrong with enjoying that process either – in fact, it probably helps make you more satisfied in a long-term relationship if you know you have had your fun in the field first. Woe be to the man who has to wish forever that he had slept with more than just one or two.
In short, game doesn’t tell you the whole story about conservative, realist thinking, but it fills its function. And daring to accept what you learn in game, a study of how people work in the mating process, helps you accept the study of mankind as a whole. While crushing lies that are tied to other lies outside of game.
It also makes you less frustrated, once you have learned game, and it toughens you up. It isn’t all the toughness you need, but it is one part of the whole.
When people say that game is immoral, we can note one thing: no one in the manosphere tells you to lie to a woman you approach. Present yourself in the best way when you talk, but not lie. That is far more honest than the lies about “love conquers all”, “it doesn’t matter what you look like or who you are, as long as there is love”, and all of that romantic nonsense that ties into an egalitarian worldview that denies true human nature.
LikeLike
This article says Unwin “studied” a bunch of societies.How do you “study” a society? Seems you have to break that down and focus on specific aspects,like war,agriculture,sexual habits,etc…point I am trying to make is maybe this guy went into the study of these societies with a bias toward seeing sexual morality as the glue that holds a society together. In America ,we are going down because of the masive presence of non-whites,pure and simple. its not sustainable to take care of them in the manner we do,and if we cut them off,well sir,heh heh heh, they wont like that. Certainly white women are idiots who have screwed up the country,but w/o the non-whites I think we could soldier on and have a decent time. I’m sure Unwin,had he seen the state of things today wouldve grabbed his chest,uttered a quick,”oh shit!” and died.
LikeLike
In America ,we are going down because of the masive presence of non-whites,pure and simple. its not sustainable to take care of them in the manner we do,and if we cut them off,well sir,heh heh heh, they wont like that.
———————————————————————————————–
In a system of white supremacy, non white people are the money, we are the currency.
You need us more than we need you because we can always go back to the way we lived before you even existed.
You can’t even if you wanted to.
LikeLike
Your value as “currency” pretty much went the way of Confederate dollars…
The difference nowadays being that at least Confederate dollars are merely worthless, and not a liability… as you and your ilk have become.
And as far as YT not being able to live without you, well… that’s beyond laughable… but by all means, convince your bruthas and sistahs to give us a shot at it.
LikeLike
Yet here we are. Denial much?
LikeLike
Yet another comment displaying negro intelligence. 🙄
Sock puppy, if you can somehow explain how your comment makes any sense, please do.
First, the fact that your ilk are still here is admitted by both sides… and that lamentable fact is the whole point… ergo, your “yet we are here” makes absolutely no sense.
Second, wtf does denial have to do with it? Nobody is denying that you and your kind exist in our midst.
The current topic at hand is a dispute of your value, as currency or anything else. Do pay attention, if you would comment.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
lol, dumb nigger. You’re friction. Drag. A weight on the back of America.
I agree that one day you (or the pure breeds at least) will all be back in the homeland, living the life of your ancestors.
This will be on African nature preserves and your numbers will be in the 5 figures.
Please remember to stay at least 40 meters back from the Safari vehicle.
LikeLike
http://chartsbin.com/view/548
black supremacy always seems to work out so well
LikeLike
We need you like a a bank needs robberies.
LikeLike
Women’s pathological altruism is an important factor in what is destroying Western Civilization
It is liberals who want to import masses of non-whites,
and most women vote liberal
It is mostly white males who oppose mass immigration
Women are to blame for a lot of the bad things going on now from mass immigration, amnesty to illegals to redistributing the wealth and various socialist things that in the long will inevitably bring misery
Socialism is like a purchase on a credit card; an immediate but short lived thrill when you acquire the new “item’
then years of suffering as you struggle to pay and the interest go up
Socialism is a temporary thing that is unsustainable
once you run out of other people’s money everything falls apart, every developed nation is heading that way
and every developed nation has emancipated women who vote for more socialism and more immigration
Women see – conscioulsy or not – a big government as a substitute for a good providing husband, and leftist partys want bigger governement, and women vote left…
LikeLike
skiing down an avalanche here
LikeLike
> “So, you may as well clink a glass and enjoy the time you’ve got here.”
Just find a little time to put a few buns in a bitch’s oven.
Either you and yours can help to maintain The Tree of Life, or else It will be maintained by the niggers and the Mexicans and the polygamous towel-headed moon-god worshippers.
Believe it or not, some of us can actually trace our ancestry to ancient Rome.
Which means that it was our families who kept alive all memory of civilization during the Dark Ages.
LikeLike
> “the polygamous towel-headed moon-god worshippers”
Which makes me wonder whether the Sicilian women MUDSHARKED themselves and willingly, gladly – JOYOUSLY – spread their legs:
LikeLike
if i can find an island or some place free i’ll bake more than a few buns.
if nothing else i’ve got rockin’ genes, telomeres down to my knees.
LikeLike
They say being bullied,harassed or abused when young may cause ones telomeres to shrink,lowering the lifespan. Does this mean if a broad rejected me when I was young I can sue her for (non)-sexual assault?
LikeLike
“and the polygamous towel-headed moon-god worshippers.”
Hey you knuckledragging orang utan: that “moon god” is the same God as the 3 Gods you worship you flaming degenerate faggot.
LikeLike
Women sure are….
LikeLike
Ride the Tiger
LikeLike
Ride the tigress.
LikeLike
Sex and Culture’s been on my to-read list for a while. Unfortunately and maybe somewhat inexplicably the book is entirely out-of-print.
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000K7AQFC/
Check your university libraries.
LikeLike
Sex and Culture.
LikeLike
> ” Unfortunately and maybe somewhat inexplicably the book is entirely out-of-print.”
Unlike the English language translation of Solzhenitsyn’s “200 Years Together”, which will probably never even make it INTO print.
Unwin should just be glad that not all of the copies of his book have been burned.
Yet.
LikeLike
I found a beat-up copy in UK. Cost me $160. You can also get digital copies on line if you look.
LikeLike
Or check out it right here http://www.groin.com/library/
LikeLike
Question for the big brains:
Didn’t all cultures start with religions that had Gods AND Godesses?
If so, is getting rid of the Godess the 1st step in the degeneration, or a step that buys your culture time to retard the degeneration?
or is it irelevant?
LikeLike
Let me check my bible.
Nope
LikeLike
the bible has mary – she more or less took over the chores from “godesses”
LikeLike
Only to certain folks… let’s not kill ants with a hammer here.
No serious Christian worships Mary the same way as Christ and Jehovah.
They usually call it veneration… but to these Protestant bones, it still smacks of idolatry.
LikeLike
Those “certain folks” are Catholics, the by far largest group of Yahweh worshippers, who used to have a monopoly on the franchise in most of the Christian lands. That is a whole lot of goddess worship.
Anyway, for the original question: no, getting rid of goddesses doesn’t mean a thing. And thwack shows his ignorance. Look at Hinduism, for example: Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva are men. Look at Buddhism: Buddha is a man. Look at Shinto: the spirits in the objects and concepts all around the worshipers were thought of as male spirits. Look at Greek mythology: Zeus, Poseidon and Hades were men, the female gods are not what make the world go round. Look at Asatru: it started out with the trinity (trinity being a recurring concept in Aryan religions, eventually picked up by Xtianity just like the resurrection of a god who sacrifices himself for the harvest) of Odin, Thor and Frey before more gods were added. Always, goddesses exist because male gods exist. They are wives and sisters and daughters, because people reasoned that if gods were like human beings, there must be women there too.
Today people think Afrodite and Freya were “love goddesses”, and isn’t love so very important? That’s not how it worked. Afrodite and Freya were the most beautiful and prominent of female gods in each mythology, so they were the ones women prayed to when they wanted a female ally. And of course what was most important to women was to find love, i.e. to tie a husband to them. So in later and more poetic ages, notably the Renaissance, the “love” aspect was emphasized.
Perhaps the most important female god of all was Hel, the death goddess in Nordic mythology. Otherwise female gods are mostly just … there, not running any important part of the world. Reflecting the societies that the worshippers lived in. Again we see this in Christianity, where Mary was elevated to the status of a female goddess, but she doesn’t run any particular part of nature. (Unsurprisingly, Judaism doesn’t have any female equivalent, perhaps the ONLY religion to not have any female deity to appeal to. This is a religion where the most loyal followers have sex with their wives only after covering her with a sheet, dirty woman that she is, and then cutting a hole in the sheet. Done only for procreation. That is considered the height of religious devotion, as women are filth, they think. That was carried over somewhat to Christianity, but not to the same degree.)
LikeLike
Yeah, I read D. H. Lawrence’s Apocalypse too.
LikeLike
Those “certain folks” are Catholics, the by far largest group of Yahweh worshippers, who used to have a monopoly on the franchise in most of the Christian lands. That is a whole lot of goddess worship.
(sigh) We. do. not. worship. Mary.
LikeLike
I prefer the other spelling “Frigga”
LikeLike
That’s a bunch of …
You do not know as much as you think you do.
Wikipedia is not a proper Classic Studies graduation.
LikeLike
Greg Eliot: nope, sorry, haven’t read “Apocalypse”, and I fail to see your arguments since you don’t present any.
“(sigh) We. do. not. worship. Mary.” — I have seen enough of Italian churches to know exactly what is going on. They needed someone to fill the Mama role for them. They pray to “the Virgin Mary”, isn’t that worship? Whatever word you want to give it.
Newbie: LOL Poor boy can’t refute a thing I said, so you just throw out “Wikipedia!” Nope, sorry little boy, not a thing I wrote did I get from Wikipedia. My knowledge of the fantasies known as religions is extensive and comes from a long list of sources, few of which have to do with the internet.
LikeLike
I fail to see your arguments since you don’t present any.
And, as I’ve repeated here ad nauseum, I don’t bother with long spiels anymore, especially on Cyberian forums, because
a) you can’t teach a pig to sing
and
b) any attempt merely annoys both teacher and pig.
It’s just an expression, no porcine snark is meant to be directed your way, bro.
LikeLike
In fact the “latry” in idolatry comes from the distinction between latria (worship of God) and dulia (giving the good their due). I’m not Catholic myself, but learning about what the Catholics actually teach is good brain exercise.
LikeLike
One thing is to obey your priest.
Another thing, a difficult thing, is to be a good, independent, and true catholic.
For instance, I wonder if killing a man or injuring him severely is acceptable in any way (outside war and or self defence) to Catholics…
LikeLike
So one part of idolatry comes from some word that doesn’t directly translate to worship. Is that supposed to be a defense for what goes on in the Catholic Church? I note you don’t say anything about the actual facts in Catholic practices, just nitpick over words, which wasn’t part of the issue at all.
LikeLike
The only “christians” that I know for sure are Goddess worshipers are the protestants. The greatest evidence is one look at their countries, where this whole fucked up situation (feminism and female liberty) got started. Even when foreign groups were the ones who came up with the idea, the protestant population gladly accepted it without renouncing to their “religion”. IN the case of catholic countries they had to become apostates first before accepting that (Spain, Italy, France, Latin America, et al)
LikeLike
+1
LikeLike
Lol Filipina girls are Super empowered ,top 10 Feminist countries, and they are Catholic, the exception to the rule, eh?
LikeLike
@Kim Soo Hyun
I’ve never met a Catholic Phillipine, only people with traces of Christianity in them but that really don’t believe in that stuff, it’s been over 60 years the organized framework fell.
LikeLike
True.
The problem with protestantism is that it started as a good idea but it quickly degenerated into a vast panoply of heresies.
There are no Cardinals or doctors of the church in Protestantism.
Protestants (much less so to Anglicans) simply do not discuss their faith,
they do not ask what is right or wrong. Whenever they disagree they go out and form a new protestant community. It’s ridiculous.
Protestantism is the seed of liberalism.
And unfortunately so, because it started as a reaction to the degenerancy of Catholicism.
So, what started as a reinvigoration of Catholicism has fallen into a parody of it.
Orthodoxism seems to be the most sane of the versions of Christianity, despite the savagery of the Great North European Plain or the madness of the Greeks, with all the vices of the Turks.
LikeLike
You’ll find that France was actually ahead of the curve.
LikeLike
Did you mean ‘Orthodoxy,’ Newbie? Presumably Eastern Orthodoxy specifically?
LikeLike
So, J.M., you can’t refute the fact that Catholics worship “the Virgin Mary”, and therefore you blabber on about the evils of Protestants. Typical female/leftist/Catholic way of ignoring an issue and try to talk about something else when you know you have lost. Instead of trying to learn something. Pathetic.
“where this whole fucked up situation (feminism and female liberty) got started.” — Um, the Catholic Church is one of the major importers of African immigrants to the U.S., not being content to merely advocate it but actually having people in Africa systematically gathering Africans to send to the U.S. Thereby increasing the socialist voters, and thereby increasing the power of feminism. Catholicism has always made unholy alliances. It is a religion that is majority non-White, let’s not forget, so its aim to destroy the West through mass immigration and an alliance with leftism is only to be expected.
Protestants came up with feminism? Nope. It was in fact people from a whole different religion who started it. People like Andrea Dworkin and Betty Friedan.
LikeLike
Getting rid of the Goddess is the first step in civilization. You need a creator God who has a plan and a purpose, rather than one who wastes all his time sniffing after tail.
With the Greeks their Gods are half truth, half parody; Zeus is constantly screwing himself up by sniffing after pussy. The Jews did him one better, by following a God who didn’t have a woman to distract him.
LikeLike
It may be that the outcome is fixed – but the length of time it takes varies.
A regular cycle takes ~400 years. The roman empire made 5 full cycles until its fall. The current anglo-american cycle is only about 400 years.
It is by no means certain the demise will come now, it could well take another 400 years or more.
That said. If one falls, another one rises. So unless one is a tree we are free to move to greener pastures. This is not a bad thing – it was the very same thinking that made the people from europe sail westwards a few hundred years ago.
LikeLike
Except Native America was a largely empty piece of land, whereas there are no more undiscovered lands to live on.
Not that you couldn’t drive out the Billion Pakis.
LikeLike
what about the moon?
LikeLike
Too late, whitey’s on the moon.
LikeLike
Hahahaha!
LikeLike
Cheese and crackers
LikeLike
bananas and monkeys.
LikeLike
Sun and burn
LikeLike
Scrabble and chess.
LikeLike
Twitter and Tinder
LikeLike
Thwack, you should just admit when du bist mit deinem Latein am ende.
llzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlz
LikeLike
Im just quoting pulsotic.
Wait a minute…
What color is he?
LikeLike
Canada is the second largest country on the planet and has a tiny population.
it is mostly an empty piece of land…
LikeLike
Do people live under trees in the forests? No, they live in the cities. And the cities fill up. Take a bus route where only about half the seats were filled two decades ago – which are now completely full, and more buses need to run on the same route. Full of loud, foul-smelling people. Big surprise: the cities become overcrowded, and it doesn’t matter how many trees surround them.
LikeLike
Yes that is true, it is the same in Australia, it is mostly a vast empty space but people all live crowded like sardines in large cities
but that empty space in Canada or Australia could be filled with millions of white people instead of third world immigrants
LikeLike
why isn’t it?
LikeLike
Because white man’s civilization is following the same path as all previous advanced civilizations,
after the peak there is a slow decline, we have entered the decline phase
It is like when they open a new bar or discotheque, at first some hot women hang there, which attracts good looking men, which attracts more hot women, the place is more and more filled with hot looking people until it reaches a certain point – like a climax – but eventually words spreads out and ugly people start to hang at that place, but the hot looking people don’t like that, then some of them start to go hang elsewhere, which means the ratio of ugly to hot goes up which causes more hot people to stop hanging at that place, and this is the decline phase
What made the place great is what attracted people who made the place worse
See the parallel with white man’s civilization?
LikeLike
So what are you going to do white man?
LikeLike
I wouldn’t give it 400 years. We’re moving faster than most. We went from piss poor backwoodsmen shitting in the fields to world superpower in about 40 years, and we’ve gone from burgeoning empire to rotting empire – something that took Rome from about 100 BC to about 100 AD – in 30 years. The pace of technology and the speed with which everything, including abject moral rot, spreads through society, will hasten our demise.
I give us more like 30-40 years, tops.Two generations.
LikeLike
Exactly. We have the internet now and Tinder. We’re circling the drain.
LikeLike
A unique aspect today is democracy. It started off as a good thought, something to make sure that tyrants could be deposed through peaceful means, but in practice it quickly turned into a corrupt system where votes are bought. Socialism, a system for demonizing the few in order to win votes from the many and an excuse to bribe them with other people’s money, never occurred to the democratic philosophers. The socialists made it big when illiterate peasants moved to the cities to work in factories, and didn’t understand what for them there men with glasses were sitting behind the desks for, scribbling on papers and getting paid more for that. The socialists could exploit such ignorance.
Now that people are more educated and Westerners have moved firmly to the Right, so that the Left couldn’t win if only Westerners voted, the socialists have imported new allies, of which there are billions to bring in. And Third World immigration will of course lead to new Third World nations with Third World economies, economy being a reflection of the quality of the people and its mental capacity.
This is unprecedented in history. And so the fall comes much quicker this time. Thanks, media bosses – and how do you expect your own to survive in the swamp you make? That’s the irony in this.
A scorpion came to a frog by the river and asked the frog to carry it to the other side.
“No way,” said the frog. “When you are on my back, you will sting me and I will sink and die.”
“I will not,” said the scorpion. “That would kill me too, don’t you see?”
The frog thought of this, and then agreed to carry the scorpion. But halfway across the river he felt a sharp pain in his back, and soon his body turned numb.
“Why did you sting me?” asked the frog as he was sinking. “Now you will drown too.”
“I could not help it,” replied the scorpion. “It is simply in my nature….”
LikeLike
Arbiter
This is unprecedented in history. And so the fall comes much quicker this time
——————————————————————————————–
No its not.
Im sure the Red man thought the same thing when your ancestors showed up here and jacked him for his happy meal.
LikeLike
Aw, poor wittle porch monkey. Always the white man is to blame, oppressing everyone! Red man never did no oppressing, always whitey, yo! lol
Rape!
LikeLike
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_among_the_indigenous_peoples_of_the_Americas
you’re really on a roll with this “selective history of the world” bullshit
LikeLike
and yet here we are.
All your great kings and queens, all your superior genetics, all your great and vast abilities, 1600 SAT, bla bla bla…
Have brought you to this point, right here and right now.
Now what?
LikeLike
thwack, was that supposed to be a comeback to your ridiculous leftist ignorance of history? You didn’t defend yourself very well, poor boy.
LikeLike
The Germanic invasions of the civilised Roman Empire come to mind.
The difference was that the Germanics were a relatively small population who respected the Roman and Greek heritage. It took Europe into a 400 years or so Dark Age.
And subsequent invasions by the Moors, the Mongols and the Turks. We still have Albania here, and now we have Kosovo and Bosnia.
Yes, the Viking bastards could be described as filthy barbarians as well, but they were civilised later. . .
So, America is doomed.
Your only hope is that the Latin Americans flock your contry instead of the YKWs Africans and Asians.
Latin Americans know that white is superior.
They may respect European civilisation. As long as they are treated the same way they are in Latin America and as long as far left / Democratic garbage is not feed to them.
Most mixed race people from Latin America CAN indeed lived in civilised society. Just as a small percentage of Africans can.
They need only a strong, paternaistic hand to tell them what to do, how to do, what is off limits, and what happens when they step the line.
Chile is a majority mestizo country and it works kind of well.
Alaska is an almost majority indian state, and it keeps functioning somewhat well.
LikeLike
The Germanic tribes took Europe into 400 years of Dark Age? Ridiculous. The Roman Empire took far more territory than its population could protect. They had to maintain enormous armies on a population not nearly big enough to feed them. The fall of Rome became inevitable because of its own inability to fill conquered lands with its own people. When Roman armies moved into an area they were referred to as locusts – by Roman peasants also – because they empoverished the peasants by taking their produce.
Rome, hopelessly corrupt and overexpanded, debased its currency dozens of times until it was basically worthless. Thereby all sorts of investments became impossible, and economic transactions were kept at a bare minimum. The economy went backward.
Due to this, the Germanic tribes were often seen as liberators. Finally the people held by Rome were free of that debt-riddled, bloated empire.
Then came the Catholic Church, after having tortured and killed bishops who didn’t agree with its complete control. It managed to spread, sadly, by lying to the Goths that the Church was what had created the immense Roman Empire, when in fact it was a latecomer that only served to weaken the Roman warrior spirit. The Goths believed it and took the Church with them when they went to Gaul and Iberia and elsewhere. This parasite which claimed a monopoly on Christianity saw progress as a threat. The scientific spirit of Antiquity was snuffed out in favor of a fanatical, superstitious worldview. For example: in ancient Greece people had long theorized that the earth was round. People could see that when ships appeared far away at sea, the sails were the first part to be visible, and calculations were made that came close to determining the size of the earth. This was completely forbidden by the monopolistic Catholic Church, as their religious texts written by Hebrew nomads said the earth rested on seven pillars, and that’s that.
Without the Catholic Church the Renaissance inventions would have come much earlier. Europe’s population would have become wealthier and thereby larger, with better inventions in the fields of warfare in the hands of larger armies easily holding Huns and Mongols at bay. The Huns would have been met by gunpowder.
LikeLike
Usually it takes a while to figure out someone is full of shit, but Arbiter has managed to display his voluminous ignorance in two posts.
LikeLike
LOL “antiracist” reveals itself.
LikeLike
Enough of this apocalyptic folderol. What have I been telling you guys about dance as the best venue for meeting chicks?
[CH: The best venue for meeting chicks is sex addicts anonymous.]
LikeLike
…
LikeLike
Jeez, Louise… that’ll put a man off his feed.
LikeLike
Dont insult thwacks lady!
LikeLike
> “sex addicts anonymous”
Probably also the best venue for meeting human papilloma virus, antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea, hepatitis b, human immunodeficiency virus, etc etc etc…
LikeLike
….Lord forgive me, why did I watch even 10 seconds of that video? Please someone hack into the website and delete it…..
LikeLike
The still picture was too much for me.
LikeLike
Funny thing is if she had danced like that many hours a day every day she never would have gotten fat in the first place…
LikeLike
how’s this working out for the Arabs?
LikeLike
“The whole of human history does not contain a single instance of a group becoming civilized unless it has been absolutely monogamous”
The Islamic Golden Age seems like a very obvious exception to that statement.
[CH: True. Although from what I know of Islamic history, the polygamy was limited in scope. Most men married one woman.]
LikeLike
Sexual Restraint is the key word. Not monogamy.
LikeLike
Thank you.
“One God, this I can understand… but one wife? (grimaces) This is not… generous“.
LikeLike
Ben Hur quotes for the win!
LikeLike
During their “Golden Age”, the towel-heads were piggy-backing on the remnants of ancient Sassanid bloodlines in [what we now call] Iran, and ancient Greek bloodlines in [what we now call] Syria [Damascus], Egypt [Alexandria], Sicily [Syracuse], and finally Turkey [Troy/Nicaea/Constantinople].
Once those ancient and noble bloodlines were destroyed – via polygamy and cousin marriage and miscegenation – the innate barbarism of the sand nigger came to rule the roost.
LikeLike
Fucking A.
“Sand Nigger” gets you sent to moderation purgatory?
Fuck that shit.
Pabst Blue Ribbon.
LikeLike
You do know that Pabst means Pope?
LikeLike
You are the one who calls yourself Zombie.
LikeLike
“[CH: True. Although from what I know of Islamic history, the polygamy was limited in scope. Most men married one woman.]”
Multiple partnering is still limited in scope. The average woman has 3 partners, right?
[CH: Hard to say for sure. Bifurcation is a big factor in female # of partners.]
I don’t think this guy’s quote makes much sense because there are very very few civilizations that require real life long monogamy.
[Serial monogamy is close enough.]
Christianity is basically the only major civ that required this. Ancient Greeks and Romans, Hindus and others were all polygamous and had men keeping slaves or concubines in addition to wives.
LikeLike
They were equalizing marriage in the process as the system you describe also created social instability. This actually appealed immensely to women, who were over represented in early Christian communities. Where the women go, there go the men.
LikeLike
Yes, I was thinking the same thing. It seems to me that the pre-Christian world and the non-Christian world consisted of societies that forced women to practice hard monogamy so the men could channel their energies into building civilization on behalf of children they knew were theirs. However, men did not practice hard monogamy. Men had mistresses, multiple wives (in the case of honestly polygamous societies), slave concubines, and could (and did) visit prostitutes. Unwin strikes me as a bit prudish and ethnocentrically biased in his claims.
Also, the early Christian Church, once it gained state power, refused to criminalize prostitution. Hence, men who could get multiple women (though had one official wife) continued to do so and many randy men who could not get multiple women simply visited prostitutes on the side. The Church appears to have understood that it was not necessary to control male sexuality to the extent that female sexuality needed to be contained for the stability of civilization.
LikeLike
little spoon, tell me: how many slaves do you think the average Roman had?
LikeLike
Google say 1.5%, which may not be the same as the percentage of men who had concubines. Still, what is the percentage of white american adult men who have more than 1 partner concurrently in present? I would think higher than 2% but lower than 10%
I found this on monogamy-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monogamy
“Recent surveys conducted in non-Western nations have also found cultural and gender differences in extramarital sex. A study of sexual behavior in Thailand, Tanzania and Côte d’Ivoire suggests about 16–34% of men engage in extramarital sex while a much smaller (unreported) percentage of women engage in extramarital sex.[11] Studies in Nigeria have found around 47–53% of men and to 18–36% of women engage in extramarital sex.[12][13] A 1999 survey of married and cohabiting couples in Zimbabwe reports that 38% of men and 13% of women engaged in extra-couple sexual relationships within the last 12 months.[14]
For the US, Three studies have used nationally representative samples. These studies have found that about 10–15% of women and 20–25% of men engage in extramarital sex.[18][19][20]”
Interestingly, the percentage of women cheating is similar for whites and blacks. It’s the rate of male cheating that varies a lot. This could be from the study being wrong. But it is possible that this is a real result and that there is a segment of promiscuous women in a bifurcated model where black promiscuous women have more partners than white promiscuous women (who have more partners than asian promiscuous women). This would allow for female cheating to be similar while male cheating is a lot higher among blacks.
Either way, it would seem the sexual restraint imposition is needed at least as much for men as it is for women in order to approach monogamy. Where men rule, they usually allow the well off to be polygamous. If women have total sexual freedom, the majority of women (excluding blacks) don’t have many partners by nature, no matter what the laws allow. It’s only a small segment of women that has many partners. But I am not sure what the greater social effect of that small segment is. That promiscuous segment probably strongly prefers to sleep with alphas, so how does their existence even really impact the majority of people who are beta males and non-promiscuous females?
LikeLike
Almost all people were monogamous – just like in China, where the emperor would have many wives but ordinary people did not. The “polygamy” in Islam is mostly this: a man would not divorce a woman, because she needed a husband to pay for her. So he bought her a separate house to live in and gave her money every week, while living with his second wife. This is still the case today. I have heard of cases of this in Bahrain, for example
LikeLike
Civilization may as well go through cycles, as long as the people themselves carry on.
LikeLike
What do you mean by “wild”… unrestrained sexuality? If so no way women are the wilder sex.
[CH: “Wild” doesn’t mean horny level. It means, “capable of inflicting mass destruction to social cohesion”.]
LikeLike
Per CH’s response… Anyone who’s seen the havoc a pretty girl who will wantonly drop her pants can wreak on an organization can attest to this.
Absolute. Chaos.
LikeLike
Hell, even a relatively plain one.
LikeLike
tell me more
LikeLike
With pictures.
LikeLike
From what I’ve seen, a pretty girl can wreck an organization even if she’s not sleeping around. Just the tension of “I could be fucking her” and “she could be fucking someone else” can be brutal.
LikeLike
This Brigadier General Sinclair’s rape trial comes to mind.
LikeLike
Im about to lose control-and I think I like it
LikeLike
Gotcha. I thought you meant “more capable of wonton sexual behavior”. In a totally judgment-free society (we’re not quite there yet) there would still be a significant percentage of women who would remain sexually selective.
[CH: Women will always remain sexually selective. The problem for civilization occurs when women’s selectivity starts targeting the wrong kinds of men.]
LikeLike
Is wonton sexual behavior the same as yellow fever?
LikeLike
Ugh, I knew that didn’t look right. I hate misspelling words.
LikeLike
Darn werds!
LikeLike
More like jungle fever.
LikeLike
Ice Cube was a hero to most
LikeLike
lol. O’Shea Jackson sure had you dummies fooled with his little shuck-and-jive. Good thing the hebrews whom he fellated taught him to fool dumb ghetto lovers into believing his image.
Rape!
LikeLike
Thwack, you seem to have contracted a festering std called “whorefinder.” They make a cream for that…
LikeLike
Kev
Thwack, you seem to have contracted a festering std called “whorefinder.” They make a cream for that…
———————————————————————————————-
I know. He’s kind of like a poor mans “Greg Eliot”; but by the time you find this out you can’t get rid of him.
LikeLike
“Wonton” is a soup, sugartits.
LikeLike
They’re small dumplings. Sometimes they are in soup.
LikeLike
LOL
LikeLike
… What do you mean by “wild”… unrestrained sexuality? If so no way women are the wilder sex.
That’s the usual delusion betas have, that women are just less sexually wild and aggressive than men.
Women are both less sexually wild than men are, with betas with whom they just don’t want sex at all, and far wilder and sexually unrestrained and often aggressive with alpha men, with whom they want sex very badly and lots of it, and especially when they are in the fertile part of the cycle. Many if not most women will do amazing things to get laid with an alpha. Male desire is a dull constant, female desire switches between revulsion and predatory depending on how alpha the man is and the part of the cycle.
If your experience is that women are not sexually aggressive with “men”, the blue pill is your destiny…
LikeLike
“female desire switches between revulsion and predatory depending on how alpha the man is and the part of the cycle.”
This is just…. wrong. Of course there are sexually predatory females, but the average woman of any SMV is not throwing herself sexually at multiple men, even multiple alpha men, at the same rate that a hot alpha guy is having sex with different women. That’s what “wild” means in this context– promiscuity. Not who wants the most sex in a monogamous relationship, or who initiates and when.
LikeLike
True, and CH answers this above. Women are the gatekeepers of the womb, and when the gatekeepers don’t do their job society is in trouble.
LikeLike
Although most women remain unaware, every woman has the potential to far more unrestrained sexually than any single man is. Why do you think they are multi-orgasmic?
LikeLike
Many women aren’t multi-orgasmic and there’s a significant segment that can’t orgasm from intercourse at all. I don’t think there’s ever been a persuasive argument that a woman’s orgasm serves a reproductive purpose.
If women have greater potential for unrestrained sexuality, why aren’t they exercising it? Social/health barriers to casual sex have been minimized, and it’s pretty easy to get an attractive guy to have sex with you.
[CH: Unless you’re old, ugly, or a fat cow.]
Yet, single men are still more promiscuous than single women, assuming the same number of appealing available options.
LikeLike
“[CH: Unless you’re old, ugly, or a fat cow.]”
Well yes, but that’s a different motivation– women trading sex for affection/attention. This is about who is “sluttier” (I know that’s not what you originally meant by “wild” though) and if women were in fact the more naturally promiscuous sex, you’d see much sluttier behavior than we even see now because it’s that much easier for women to get sex. Yet this still doesn’t happen.
This concept always gets pushback here and I don’t know why. Isn’t it a good thing that women are naturally less promiscuous than men?
LikeLike
I didnt know, that whining about a decline is a sign of being alpha?
LikeLike
Was Christ whining about the Pharisees?
Avaunt, you fairy.
LikeLike
What does Jesus Christ look like?
LikeLike
Well, y’all keep saying he’s black.
LikeLike
Lets see,
1. No fixed address
2. Fucks with joos and ain’t got no money
3. Leads a gang
4. No visible means of support
5. Talks shit he can’t back up.
6. Wino
7. shoes with no socks (stink foot)
8. Looks suspicious
9. Wears baggy clothes (shoplifting)
10. outstanding warrants…
LikeLike
Changes water into purple drank.
LikeLike
A description of Christ was asked… not you.
LikeLike
A contemporary sketch of him is said to exist in India in a Hindu Monastery there. It was supposedly drawn when he was about 26 or so. The drawing they showed in this documentary I saw, purporting to be this sketch, is very similar to what the west already conceives. However, he had much more hair on his head, almost a lion’s mane of hair. The beard was of reasonable length, the face more youthful than what the West typically perceives. It was an interesting artifact, even if it was a fake, as it was still very old.
LikeLike
His face was quite similar to the Rothschild scion, David Rothschild.
LikeLike
And here’s Greg with the “Avaunt” and “Fairy” again. You owe CH $2.
LikeLike
Aren’t you supposed to be getting buggered by Alaric right about now?
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
Awww it’s all too much for you is it sweetheart?
LikeLike
Doesn’t more of the blame rest at the feet of weak men for failing to uphold culture & values, and failing to control their daughters and wives? Female sexual freedom only happens when men allow it, it would seem.
LikeLike
*Crickets*
LikeLike
s/allow it/are coerced into allowing it/g
LikeLike
I thought that aspect has long been admitted, here at the chateau… why don’t you short-attention-span fairies pay attention?
LikeLike
Yes.
But more than violence towards woman, considering violance as to obligate another to do what onew whant, I think what we would need is violence against the government…
LikeLike
They’re powerless to stop the ykw, don’t have high enough IQs.
LikeLike
You’re going to have to make up your mind whether you want to troll as a negro or as a Jew.
LikeLike
You’re going to have to try harder to make a name for yourself.
LikeLike
Two blacks, pattin’ each other on the back… with nuthin’… go figure.
LikeLike
White people create civilizations. They brown out and the civilizations crumble into dust. Lack of self-control is just a symptom of browning out.
LikeLike
So, you may as well clink a glass and enjoy the time you’ve got here.
LikeLike
LBF I had no idea you were a homosexual
LikeLike
In an age of abundance and excess, it’s the job of the captains of the guard to teach the gatekeepers to keep the fucking portcullis down.
LikeLike
The Price Of Female Sexual Freedom – priceless … except on ladies’ night where it’s half price.
LikeLike
It’s clear that when women are left to pursue their most natural instincts, societies fall. Women, when left unchecked, encourage and propagate negative traits of men that, by all means, are a drag on society as a whole. I’ve seen jobless, violent druggies get pussy that my honest, upstanding, law abiding beta friends could only dream of draining their balls into.
Here’s my question though: Why has evolution made women, the sexual gatekeepers, the ones who decide whose seed will be planted and whose traits will be propagated, to desire behaviors and traits that are negative for humanity as a whole? The only reason I can figure is that we are made specifically to annihilate each other.
LikeLike
that’s a false assumption. when the society as whole is in anarchy and almost everybody is uncooperative, the small groups that can cooperate get an immense advantage and propagate.
when everybody is cooperating, it’s worth to use this trust by being uncooperative yourself. so badboys propagate.
LikeLike
Excellent
LikeLike
Actually up to recently societies had taken the roll of gatekeeper
Some went as far as using a padlock
http://crichyrulz.deviantart.com/art/Maid-Marian-chastity-belt-328610638
In that respect women fight for liberation is a fight of a oppressed and enchained vagina against a padlock
A liberated vagina is an exciting prospect for those like it in all its splendor
and the repeated cause of the havoc in societies who never learn from the past
And this is Courbet ‘s contribution to the subject
http://www.heralddeparis.com/france-head-of-courbets-notorious-origine-du-monde-found-magazine-claims/200767
LikeLike
Writing about padlocks is a typical example of sensationalist writing about history. How many such have actually been in use? And while the media want to portray women as helpless victims in history, it was never that way, especially not in the West.
They do the same with today’s Gulf countries, don’t they? And yet I know for a fact that parents ask the girl if she wants to marry a guy who comes to ask for her hand. The parents of both families sit down to talk when a boy has made the offer and afterward the girl’s parents talk it over with her. Definitely not the picture we get from the media.
LikeLike
Been saying this for years. On many posts here as well: civilization has a fatal flaw. Once successful, it spawns parasites that consume the host.
LikeLike
Right on, self destruction rape.
LikeLike
Very much like Democrats.
They drive up the cost of living by supporting burdensome regulations and taxes on the Producer class who “need to pay their fair share”.
Then when jobs are scarce and the Producers’ businesses begin to fail under crushing regulatory weight, the Democrat leeches smugly rent a U-Haul and move to another area with a booming economy.
They arrive by the millions, and find jobs made created by the local Producer class. Before long, they begin to vote in the local Democrats, agitating and organizing for bigger government and more regulations and taxes on the Producer class.
Both instances require rock-solid Alpha male frame control to keep the emoting, feels-driven gatekeepers in check.
LikeLike
Well said.
LikeLike
Civilization = man worshiping his own mind, having faith foremost in his own powers, and pursuing his own desires first…
It’ll get ya pretty far, when you’re worthy and lean…
But when you get fat, old, too comfortable, and forget God, well… there’s your Fall from Eden writ large and often.
LikeLike
Maybe thats part of a natural cleansing process that must take place from time to time because the people begin to depend on the government for civilization instead of the other way around?
LikeLike
Forget Alexander Tytler. Read Oswald Spengler. His ‘Decline of the West’ tells you everything you need to know about cyclical decline. And it sold millions.
LikeLike
text exchange with a neighboring-town younger girl (to me, 24 year old we’ll call her). not pretending i’m badass i just had my phone off. and i probably would have screwed it up had i had my phone. anyway:
24yo: are you sure you only sleep with girls you care about? you don’t know me at all but you’ll pay for a hotel to get laid by someone you hardly know. are you just trying to change things up or do you do that kind of thing a lot more than your letting on? 1:33 PM
24yo: i’m not complaining or anything. it’s probably about the same amount of money to pay for a hooker 1:34 PM
24yo: and we have texted for a little while. 1:35 PM
24yo: and i feel like i know you a little bit and you seem cool. i just got to thinking is all 1:36 PM
24yo: i guess it’s not that complicated for guys though. you see something you like and you’ll bang it. and you did say you liked my pictures 🙂 1:48 PM
24yo: i wasn’t saying i think you pay for hookers or anything. 2:17 PM
24yo: you said you have girls around to sleep with so i don’t think you need that. just about the not knowing me all that well is what i was talking about 2:18 PM
24yo: but tuesday is cool for me. i still want to do that. 2:20 PM
LikeLike
WTF is supposed to be the problem here?
The bitch is practically begging for it.
Let’s just hope she doesn’t turn out to be a dude or something.
Trannie or whatever.
LikeLike
oh yeah, not a problem, i should have explained better. it was just an illustration of how helpful it is to shut up. had i tried to be clever instead of just working and ignoring my phone i’d have probably done worse than silence did for me. anyway was entertaining seeing her answering her own questions after the fact.
LikeLike
This post reminds me of the old adage: “Out of chaos comes order, and out of order comes chaos.” More interesting, though, is what will this chaos will look like when it hits our own civilization. Any guesses?
LikeLike
Reference youtube.
LikeLike
“Why are women primarily to blame? Because as the sexual gatekeepers, their lack of restraint is more destabilizing to societal prosperity.”
Their lack of restraint is because they didn’t have a strong man in their life to restrain them or guide them. So destabliziation is much easier. Both genders are to blame.
To start the inventors of birth control are men. Feminism was an ideology invented by men. Men are the cause…women are the effect.
LikeLike
“the inventors of birth control are men”
Which kind of men, exactly?
LikeLike
I don’t quite understand this blog, although I read it every day. You understand that a lack of sexual restraint leads to civilizational decline, yet you advocate the “pump and dump.” So you knowingly support that which you know is destructive of civilization. Why don’t you advocate the use of game to create marriages that result in children, rationally-ordered relations between the sexes, and traditional hierarchies? I mean, wow. Just wow.
LikeLike
If I wanted religious or moral nonsense, I’d go to church.I prefer poolside.
LikeLike
Heartiste is a minion of Satan. He gives us knowledge of good and evil, but leads us astray.
LikeLike
The truth is laid bare here. Do with it as you wish.
LikeLike
There isn’t an issue with women working, the issue is with women sleeping around… so, that problem is easily resolved. Btw, men have started to become gate-keepers in order to ensure relationships. LOL!
LikeLike
STFU and mix me another cocktail.
LikeLike
Why don’t you find a servant for that. Or a nice blonde. I’m too high class for that shit.
LikeLike
No you’re not. You swear.
LikeLike
Fake it til you make it?
LikeLike
No one from the upper classes uses the term “classy.” It’s an immediate middle class tell.
LikeLike
I didn’t say classy, said high class.
LikeLike
Thousand-dollar-per-night high class?
LikeLike
Coon?
LikeLike
Same thing.
LikeLike
Besides all that… she’s dumb!
… how adorable.
LikeLike
Didn’t that Duke porn broad describe herself as “classy”?
She and every other deluded cooze these days… sigh.
LikeLike
Are you on welfare, sista?
LikeLike
For me too!
LikeLike
I’ll give you a good tip if you suck my dick right.
LikeLike
Its with both, especially when all the laws are skewed in your favor. All of it is intended to break down and destroy marriage. You assume that if men are disenfranchised they won’t somehow rebel or drop out. How do you think Haiti got to be the way it is? That is the end result of a matriarchy.
LikeLike
Over/under on the days until this paid troll gets defunded?
LikeLike
Happy to oblige-
http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2008/08/online-book-sex-and-culture-by-jd-unwin.html
LikeLike
Here’s sordid case of the results of female sexual freedom. There’s currently an Amber Alert in Maryland for some guy who offed the mother of his natural daughter, and then “kidnapped” the daughter. The mother as usual had sole custody and the father was ordered away. The interesting part of this tale is the mother had remarried some habitual sex offender who has just be arrested for, reading between the lines, molesting the daughter. One wonders whether the father should be given a medal instead?
On March 5, Daniel Cortez, who shares Caitlyn’s address in Ardee Way, Dundalk, was indicted on child sex charges. He is charged with abusing someone who lived at the home on Ardee Way. Cortez is a registered sex offender who is charged with eleven counts of sex abuse, reports ABC Baltimore’s Joce Sterman.
From here: http://www.heavy.com/news/2014/03/timothy-virts-caitlyn-virts-amber-alert/
LikeLike
Why are women primarily to blame? Because as the sexual gatekeepers, their lack of restraint is more destabilizing to societal prosperity.
LikeLike
Its truer to say that the whole of human history does not contain a single instance of a group becoming monogamous.
There are plenty of cultures where sexual exclusivity is insisted upon sometimes on pain of death but not a single one where sexual exclusivity has an iron grip on the culture as anything but an idea, certainly not as a practice.
LikeLike
How the past is forgotten by many… Up to 50-60 years ago in most developed countries 80-90% of women were virgins on marriage, and most of the rest had lost their virginity to their future husband after engagement, so in a very significant way this is nonsense:
“sexual exclusivity has an iron grip on the culture as anything but an idea, certainly not as a practice.”
Then a significant minority of women would have occasional affairs, even after marrying as virgins, but the majority would not.
However what mattered to men was reliable paternity of at least the first-born, and since alphas have always been exposed to the real nature of women’s sexuality, they realized that reliable paternity of at least the first-born could only be assured by physical, proven virginity, so they would only invest their lifetime work in women who provided that.
LikeLike
This is the usual BETA style point of view:
“Why are women primarily to blame? Because as the sexual gatekeepers, their lack of restraint is more destabilizing to societal prosperity.”
Women are the sexual gatekeepers only towards BETAS, because the betas as many, and women they don’t desire them, they are disgusted by them.
It is sexually attractive men who are the overall sexual gatekeepers, because they are few and women badly desire them, and they can pick and choose.
Women are instead the gatekeepers of commitment, the commitment that matters, that is of paternity, they decide who becomes a genetic father and who becomes a cuckold.
Lack of monogamy deprives both alphas and betas of reliable paternity; betas because women don’t want to have their children, and alphas too, because alphas experience how sexually aggressive women are towards them and realize how unreliable paternity is for them too, if women feel like jumping on every alpha’s cock that they can.
And without reliable paternity men don’t invest in the future…
LikeLike
Yup.
Men absolutely control the sex act. Without hardons, nothing happens. Women are nothing but passive receptacles.
Men control the media (letting her watch t.v. or “read” magazines is equivalent to passing her around at an orgy with a hundred dark triad alphas infecting every part of her).
Only when men band together to threaten women with physical violence and ostracization do they keep their shit in check.
Modern family courts prove the failure of men to coalesce and dominate as not only can we vote but we can coerce women to vote as we see fit.
We gave up. Pump and dump can’t be the reason because yougogirl pussy pales in comparision to submissive rape me because I’m your property pussy.
Outright shame and absolute cock denial for single mothers, fatties, yougogirls, career cunts and cougars is the only way to turn this around.
Deep down they loathe us for letting them get away with it. They are things. Put them back in the cupboard where they belong.
LikeLike
2 of the best comments I’ve read in months.
Well done.
LikeLike
Unwin’s Sex and Culture is available for download at scribd.com it is a photocopy of the hardback. it prob can be gotten also via interlibrary loan through your local library.
LikeLike
Here is a video by a new think tank called The Austin Institute called The Economics of Sex. The one issue that is most germane to the issue of changing relations beween men and women (hypergamy) is not addressed at all. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO1ifNaNABY
LikeLike
Unwin’s book is downloadable here; you need the unrar utility to unpack it. The main file is a 62Mb PDF with a scan of the 648-page book.
https://www.box.com/mensarefugee26388
A pamphlet with a similar theme to Unwin is “The Fate of Empires” by Sir John Glubb.
http://www.rexresearch.com/glubb/glubb-empire.pdf
The influx of foreigners is one of the historic stages of decline identified by Glubb, along with the Welfare State, decline of religion, and pessimism. In the final historical decline of an empire, sexual morals are relaxed and the professions are opened to women; but these are only the final stages of a process that spans many generations.
The “liberation” of women, which we usually imagine to be unique to 20th-century Western culture, has in fact happened in about a dozen powerful countries, in some cases as long as 4,000 years ago. Such “reforms” seem to be an inevitable consequence of multiple generations of prosperity, and are followed soon afterwards by conquest by a less “progressive” country.
LikeLike
||The influx of foreigners is one of the historic stages of decline identified by Glubb,||
So the USA in the 18th and 19th century was in a historic stage of decline :). It is more the influx of foreign cultures and the damage to the collective sense of trust that weakens social cohesion.
||The “liberation” of women,|| ||Such “reforms” seem to be an inevitable consequence of multiple generations of prosperity, and are followed soon afterwards by conquest||
It is not the liberation of women per se, rather its abuse by women to overturn the balance of power between the sexes, plus their reluctance to invest in bearing children because they get wealthy. Women have children primarily as pension assets… Men primarily as their genetic legacy. If most men cannot be assured of having a genetic legacy of their own they will not invest in the future.
||by a less “progressive” country.||
There is wider civilization cycle according to some authors: that agricultural civilizations eventually fall to pastoral ones. Or perhaps that sedentary ones fall to nomadic ones. In part because when bad times strike nomadic populations move elsewhere and endure, sedentary ones decay in place. Put another way nomads have a maxmin strategy, sedentaries a maxmax one.
LikeLike
Some of us enjoy the purpose of stemming the tide.Futility has its own nobility.
LikeLike
Like that Roman sentry they found years later, still at his post, in Pompei.
LikeLike
If he hasn’t been relieved he better stay put if he wants to get paid.
LikeLike
LikeLike
there are no books or studies of history to prepare for what is going to happen it has never been possible before
LikeLike
You got it. Previous declines of civilizations didn’t have the telecommunications, the travel, the widespread wealth and dozens of other things that we have. We can try to prepare for physical survival but we really don’t know what’s coming.
LikeLike
I have to give a big shout out to Krauser’s Daygame Mastery page 414 where he goes into detail on dealing with “Special Situations”. You can read the whole book for the context, but there is one passage that provided a proper perspective for game:
page 414: “Most men are terrified of stating exactly what they want because they are worried the answer will be “no”, and then the girl is lost. So they play the grey area, weaseling along the date without ever admitting they have a boner. This is utterly wrong. Women are dirtier, hornier, more wanton than any man. They are built by nature to be fuck machines. Their whole life is dominated by the pursuit of getting the right man inside them….So if you’re on a date, running the model competently, and she doesn’t play her part you need to wonder why. It’s not normal. She should come to the date because she’s sexually interested in you and sees a sexual relationship as a natural conclusion if things work out over the next few hours. Her job on the date is to let you move it forwards while she simultaneously throws out a few tests to reassure herself of your value/character.”
LikeLike
UHm you wouldnt care to put that book on a file sharing site would ya,dear friend?
LikeLike
I paid for it, why would I give it away?
LikeLike
Some have already realized and are working to end this
http://mayhaan.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-auarian-principles-third-draft.html
Regards
LikeLike
The Philipines is a nominally Cathilic country only.
The Tradition there is indigenous, not Christian nor in any way European.
The true Catholics are few and sparse. All the hallmarks of Catholicism are there in the Philipines but people do not take it serious there ever since the Spanish authoirities left (or when the Philipines got Americanised, you choose). It’s kind of a big superstition for the average men down there.
Although, I bet that there are many good Catholics in the Philipines. It’s just that the average person that claims to be Catholic there is not Catholic in the same way the Spaniard or the Italian that claims to be Catholic is. Which is not all that Catholic by the way.
LikeLike
Yeah I’ve been to Italy. You should see their TV commercials, just for starters. And France, well….. Catholics are rarely very Catholic. It is more about convenience. Of course, for an old woman it is beneficial to be Catholic, so she will be, but the rest, not so much.
Spain is the Western country where men use the most hookers. 39 percent of men have been with prostitutes at least once, and even when the economy is close to meltdown they are going strong. Cheap prostitutes are shipped over from the Balkans by Albanian gangs and the other usual Balkan criminals. These women are far uglier than Spanish women, but hey, the price is low. Not very Catholic … if we actually believe that official Catholicism has ever been the honest deal.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
“Nature has given women so much power that the law has very wisely given them little.” ~ Samuel Johnson
“Everything in the world is about sex except sex. Sex is about power.” ~ Oscar Wilde
LikeLike
It remains to be seen if women can have their BB cock and eat it to, so to speak, in this iteration of society without it collapsing…
LikeLike
I have two “anecdotal” but typical stories,
I began seeing this cute woman recently, she is in her early 40s, a blue eyed blonde.
She is involved in stuff like yoga and about 2 or 3 other activities where she meets a lot of women
and she told me she can not believe how many white women tell her they either “tried” a black guy or intend on “trying” one, she is puzzled as to how that it is like a trend now, the cool thing to do for women.
she is not into black guys.
here is the second story,
her twenty year old daughter (a cute tall slender blue eyed blonde, maybe a 7 ) met a black guy at the gym a couple of months ago, she is not easy ( as far as I know) but he managed to bed her, it was her first and only black guy…and guess what?
he gave her not one, not two but three yes *** 3 *** sexually transmitted diseases!!
Chlamydia, Gonorhea and she refused to tell me what the third one was ( probably herpes )
I could not believe everything she was telling me fits exactly what some say are “stereotypes” or “rumours”
It only confirmed that what we say here about blacks is not inspired by racism but by reality or race realism.
LikeLike
Canadian Friend
she is not into black guys.
————————————————————————————-
So which one of you has black cock on the brain syndrome?
LikeLike
he gave her not one, not two but three yes *** 3 *** sexually transmitted diseases!!
my pity meter is stuck somewhere between, “I don’t give a hoot” and “HAHAHAHAhahahaaa”.
Where was this girls father?
Stupid Bint is going to pay for that for the rest of her life. Perhaps some enterprising white knight will be happy to have the sloppy, diseased ridden remains.
LikeLike
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/1994/december12/4te080.html?start=1
Interesting Christian take on J.D.’s sex study from 1994.
LikeLike
“Virtue gives birth to quiet, quiet to leisure, leisure to disorder, disorder to ruin.”
~Machiavelli, Florentine Histories, V 1.
LikeLike
http://www.sojournerchronicles.com/2013/07/jd-unwins-sex-and-culture-right-side-of.html
LikeLike
Sad. http://www.wimp.com/goodhusband/
LikeLike
[…] I don’t think he’ll tell the truth about sluts. I don’t think he’ll get down to the dirty facts about relationship power dynamic. I don’t expect truth about The Wall. He’ll happily talk about evolution, but he’ll stop before it gets uncomfortable. I don’t think he’ll address the implications of the sexual market on civilization. […]
LikeLike