• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Matt Yglesias And Ezra Klein Are New Media Manly Icons
Real Female Beauty From 0 To 10 »

Men In Science

March 10, 2014 by CH

International Women’s Day came and went (what, you didn’t notice either?), and feminists of all 152 gender persuasions celebrated in style. Memes like this one littered chat rooms:

A patriarchal reader decided it would be the perfect time to remind the celebrants in similar fashion about the men in science to whom we owe most of our civilizational comforts.

That’s one pale-looking pastiche.

The unintended consequence of made-up equalist holidays is to subtly neg the non-straight white male honorees about their disproportionately tiny contributions to Western glory. The designated uplift groups had it better when their spokes-shysters weren’t pushing for transparently phony recognition of romper room achievements. At least before this tard and brony show became America’s light unto the nations, the losers could pretend they had an awesome heritage which was being ignored instead of patronized.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Feminist Idiocy, Ugly Truths | 252 Comments

252 Responses

  1. on March 10, 2014 at 3:45 pm Anonymous

    this is teed up for GBFM

    LikeLiked by 1 person


    • on March 10, 2014 at 6:35 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      datsz what she said friday nightz! zlzooz

      LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 6:36 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      zllzlzozozoz
      how da university works: feminism = debt & debauchery & divorce & Desecration machine/army lzozlzlzlzlzlgh weo

      lzozlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzlzozllzlz

      univeristies are at the tip (tit lzozlzlzoz) of our debt empire

      over the past thirty years or so univeristies desouled women in prima noctae assocking sessins (some of tehm secretly taped iwthout thei girls conthent as the neocons like it best) and they sent the army forth to 1) transfer assetts form menz, 2) destory the family, 3) murder 50,000,000 unborn innocent souls, 4) hype and sell sub prime loans while wearing short skirts lzozlzlzlzllzlzlz 5) lure men into marriage iwth their coconpirators the ministers who front the legal system that does what no pimp would wever do–charge men for past use of a pussy lzolsoslslslslslslslslsls

      the fembot army;s main corporate state job is to create debt debauchery destiutution debt divorce deconstruction and devastation lzozlzlzlz

      and they have succeeded!! lzozlzlzlzlzlzl

      today our debt deficit will be greater than the gnp!!!!1

      the feminsimt movement cooinnded with the largest greatest increase of debt ever known to namankinds lzozlzlzlzl this is because womenz who stamp their little feet and bitch and complain and tranfer and destory welath and say “me me m em e more material welath for me me me me for my gina!!!! it’s for the children (even though women aborted/killed/vacuumed 50,000,000 fetuss by their choice alone) lzozlzlz it takes a village–fund my village where we get to bang alphas and the betas pay for it whether we cuckold them in tehir homes or via the welfare state zlozlzozlzzlzl” and they bitch and complain and talk about handbags and butthex and twilight vampires and enocurage girls to long for and lust after undead bloodsucking vampire twilight monsters and butthexing douchebags and otehr things which make their bginas tingle repalced menz at univeristies menz who built invent iengineer buuikld invent reason truth write great books read great bookz think lzozlzl eb=engineer lzozlzlzozlzl replaced exaltation eand greatness with bdebt debuachery destitution lzozlz

      short beta men rose fast in teh unievristy as they were handed fiat bernanke cash fronm helicopter ben and they used it to surrpound themselves with syocphantic harems of womenze as all teh betas love honor worship tucker max their ultimate master because he rhymes with goldman sax and also he butthexes girls and films it woithout teh girlths ocnthent and the weekly stanadrd neocns repeat his lies lzozlzlzlzzl that he is six foot tall zlozzlzllzlzlzlzl honoring their #1 butthexual hero lzozlzlzl

      so anyeways teh fiat masters trianed owmen in the arts of divorce debuachery deseefxation destruction lozlzolzlzlz and abortion and debt creation, and as womenze rose to power on teh ffront lines of the epreemptive wars against teh unborn they murdered 50,000,000 since rose vs. wade they deconstructed and debuached tehc ulture on campuses as when yhou put womenze in charge it soons becomes all butthex all the time as priscilia paintion woemnze editor in chief of simon and schuster is publishing tucker max’s next book zlzolslssslslsoslsoslzozlzlzlzlz c hecks che-=checks it out peoples are saying and speaking out about the way womenze are debucahing defiling and butthexing the culture lozlzlzlzlzl:

      http://community.feministing.com/2009/09/why-are-female-executives-publ.html

      Why are Female Executives Publishing Tucker Max?

      Saw this floating around. good question!

      MCCOY MOUNTAIN
      ART, FILM, & LITERATURE GUILD OF AMERICA

      Ms. Priscilla Painton

      Simon & Schuster Editor in Chief

      RE: ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, Secretive Tapings of Anal Sex without The Girl’s Consent, Corporate Douchebaggery, and the Epic Failure of I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell

      Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

      “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

      Dear Ms. Painton,

      I and my colleagues in the ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD have a couple questions regarding the direction you are taking Simon and Schuster in. Why are you guys/gals hating on art, literature, culture and America? It was recently brought to our attention that you are intent on publishing Tucker Max’s ASSHOLES FINISH FIRST, and that your company actually gave him a $300,000 advance for his fart art. As the editor in chief of Simon and Schuster, owned the CBS corporation, do you truly believe Assholes Finish First? It is oft said that girls like “bad boys.” Does Tucker’s fart art douchebag wit titillate and excite you? Is that why you are publishing and profiting from it? Did you laugh during Tucker’s recent film flop when what’s-his-name stated that overweight women aren’t real people? Do you smile smugly when your billion-dollar corporation profits from douchebaggery?

      http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system “The ads were poetic ditties of white text on a black background . Like: “Blind girls never see you coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding).””

      “Over at the Washington, D.C., premiere, Max’s video minion ridicules both Vietnamese and African-American women, the former for being employed as a pedicurist, and the latter for having a name he finds funny.”

      http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

      Do you enjoy profiting from making fun of Asians and overweight women? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

      http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.com

      http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com

      Does this make you laugh Ms. Painton? It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and CBS and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First . At most it will bring in a few pennies, which will lead everyone to conclude that you and CBS aren’t in it for the money, but just the debauchery and destruction of the culture. As Tucker Max pointed out, the feminist movement empowered women and gave them the right to choose the art they affiliated with and promote. So now, with all the power in your hands, what will you chose on behalf of women all over the world? Please do us proud and choose the right thing.

      “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).””

      –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

      Why is corporate America, under your direction Ms. Painton, forcing epic “Richard Kelly” fail fart art and film on the common public? Do you also find secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent to be entertaining and titillating art?

      http://gawker.com/5363233/tucker-maxs-campaign-of-hate-against-chicagos-transit-system

      Let’s talk for a sec about something Tucker glamorizes and pretends is funny in his ‘book’: filming a naked women in his bedroom without her consent. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that while he’s doing this he is coaxing the girl to have anal sex with him, an exploitative act that a guy like him probably especially enjoys.

      –http://www.bitchmagazine.org/post/douchebag-decree-marketing-tucker-max

      – http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/11/the-rapiest-quotes-from-i-hope-they-serve-beer-in-hell/

      “OK, we can try anal sex , but I want it to be special and romantic. …. process: I was going to fuck her in the butt and film it without her consent ,” — http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/tucker_tries_buttsex_hilarity_does_not_ensue.phtml

      Do you and the CBS Corporation find this entertaining? As you know, sodomy is a sin in the Old Testament as is sex out of wedlock and fornication. What is your motivation in working with those who promote and profit from secretive tapings of anal sex?

      Do you find such “literature” and “art” to be representative of Simon and Schuster and CBS?

      “In one of his most notorious pieces, he convinces a girl to have anal sex and tapes it without her consent.” — http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/08/tucker_max/

      Despite the fact that teenagers nationwide are going to hear gem pick-up lines like “get away from me or I’m going to carve another fuck hole in your torso”, what truly crowns this film as an epic fail is its apologetic attempt to masquerade gratuity as an Apatovian bromance. –http://www.thelmagazine.com/newyork/we-hope-you-can-still-get-alcohol-poisoning-in-hell/Content?oid=1291260

      Ms. Painton–do you find that entertaining? Is it good literature? Do you consider demeaning stories about having sex with midgets good literature? Do you consider it good business to make fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities so as to bolster your bottom line?

      What is driving you to publish Assholes Finish First ? What are your motivations? Money? America does not want Tucker Max, as demonstrated this past weekend at the boxoffice. Do you find these signs to be entertaining/a good CBS investment?

      http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

      Is Tucker Max’s fan base the group that Simon & Schuster is seeking to serve under your leadership?

      http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/14/tucker-max-too-sexist-for-ad-space/

      It seems that America believes otherwise as Richard Kelly and Tucker Max’s I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell has proven to be a colossal artistic and financial failure.

      “Not faring so well, however, was the Tucker Max adaptation I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell, which took in $369,000 from 120 theaters with a well-below-average $3,075 per-screen average.” — http://www.movieweb.com/news/NEdXykfeBDXwhe

      So Priscilla, please tell us about your douchetastic love affair with Tucker Max and his fart art. Does it really titillate you as a woman and feminist? Say it isn’t so! Is this good Simon and Schuster/CBS branding? Why did your massive billion-dollar corporation reward Tucker with a $300,000 advance?

      “Little Italy is fighting back against Tucker Max ‘s controversial ad campaign . Yeah, that poster on the right says, “Blind Girls Never See You Coming.” Va fan culo, indeed.” –http://gothamist.com/2009/09/21/tucker_max.php

      Does CBS and Simon & Schuster approve of registering fake email accounts to promote stories regarding secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent?

      ” The lack of traditional plugs forced Max to promote his web site and book via the internet. He would create fake e-mail accounts and then bombard entertainment sites and news aggregators with links to his material.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

      For this, your billion-dollar corporation rewarded Tucker with a $300,000 advance.

      “Max may have to concentrate on his agent style business moving forward because he’s running out of material. He’s received a $300,000 advance for a second version of his drunken, sexual exploits – a tome that will contain the stories not ripe enough for the first cut.” — http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/11/tucker_max_sxsw/

      Are you proud of Simon & Schuster and your corporation? Funding and encouraging hype, failure, douchebaggery, debauchery, lies, secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent, and making fun of Asians, overweight women, and minorities. Is that what attracts you to Tucker Max, or is it the epic artistic and financial failure of his film?

      http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_hope_they_serve_beer_in_hell/

      “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell fails in its attempts at raunchy humor, and Tucker Max comes across so unlikable and outrageous that the film’s inevitable story arc feels forced.”

      It is not too late to choose the right direction for Simon and Schuster and walk away from publishing Assholes Finish First .

      Best,

      McCoy Mountain & The ART, FILM & LITERATURE GUILD

      –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

      Will Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster still Publish *beep* Finish First?

      the title makes no sense. *beep* might finish first in some silly women’s eyes, but they epic fail in reality, as demonstrated by tucker’s epic fart art film fail, which priscilla painton is pretendning not to notice.

      What’s up with women these days?

      It seems the more they run things, the more they try to force douchebag fart art on everyone:

      Former ‘Time’ Exec. Relieves Venerable Editor Mayhew At Simon & Schuster

      http://gawker.com/5002333/former-time-exec-relieves-venerable-editor-mayhew-at-simon–schuster

      Anywho, does Priscilla Painton at Simon & Shuster have a personal vendetta against asians, minorities, overweight women, and little people?

      Does she think tucker’s ads are cute and humorous?

      http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

      Does she get off on this?

      “The ad campaign for the new flick “I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell” includes slogans like “Deaf Girls Can’t Hear You Coming” and “Strippers Will Not Tolerate Disrespect (Just Kidding!).”

      Is that supposed to be funny?” –http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/New-Movie-Ads-Take-Offensive-to-the-Max-59695522.html

      http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/10/spot-your-local-tucker-max-douchebag/

      Is this the new face and culture of simon and schuster?

      http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/09/15/tucker-max-fans-fight-rape-with-racism/

      Does Priscilla Painton at Simon and Schuster giggle at secretive tapings of anal sex without the girl’s consent and also this:

      http://www.penguinblogs.ca/davidson/archives/00000079.html

      http://tuckermaxlies.blogspot.com/2008/08/sillylittlefreak.html

      http://www.tuckermax.com/archives/entries/date/the_absinthe_donuts_story.phtml

      “11:17: The girl starts saying something about what a horrible person I am. I stare at her, but I am not listening. I am preparing myself. I am B-Rabbit. This is the final battle rap. I will win the hostile crowd:

      [I interrupt the fat girl] “Ward, I think you’re being a little hard on the Beaver, [as I point to each in turn] so is Eddie Haskell, Wally, and Miss Cleaver.”

      [To the fat guy with greasy hair in the camo vest] “Look out everyone! It’s the Pillsbury Commando! Hey Chunk, when was the last time you washed your hair? Does it give you more hit points to have that grease helmet? I hate to break the news, but +5 defense only counts in Dungeons and Dragons.”

      [To the ugly Asian girl] “Why you no rike me? You want me frip over? You no piss me off! ME FIND YOU IN POCKING ROT!! YOU NO TAKE MING ARIVE!!”

      [To the small frail dork–I notice he has a lazy eye] “Dude–Look at me when I’m talking to you–BOTH EYES AT ONCE. Are you really this ugly or are you just playing? EVERYONE, BE CAREFUL, THIS GUY LURKS UNDER THE STAIRS AND TRIES TO LICK YOUR SHOES WHEN YOU PASS BY!”

      [To the original fatty, pause for effect] “Why do you do this to yourself? WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO YOURSELF? Look, I’m gonna give you some advice-leave the party, take the geek squad with you, go to Denny’s, order about 10 Grand Slam Breakfasts, and eat your pain away. Won’t be the first time will it?”

      11:19: I am finished. The kitchen is quiet, except for Eddie and Rich laughing. The four freaks are completely speechless. Everyone is staring at me. I blurt out, “WHAT? I’m pretty sure it’s what Jesus would’ve done.” Eddie and Rich promptly remove me from the kitchen.”

      Is Priscilla Painton publishing tucker’s next book for the love of literature, art, or money?

      ‘Cause it seems that those who work with tucker generally hate and lose literature, art, and money.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priscilla_Painton

      http://www.theladyfinger.com/2009/09/tucker-max-brings-his-misogyny-to-big.html

      “What ensues, according the film’s trailer, is alcohol-fueled misogynistic mayhem. Max has sex with several women, including, to his smug satisfaction, a dwarf.”

      See? That is the clever banker ruse.

      Have women such as Priscilla fund and promote it, while others protest it, enriching the bankers as marriage is destroyed and the state is grown.

      http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

      “A Site about the Divorce Regime, Family Court Corruption,
      and Government’s War on Fathers”

      “The divorce regime is the most totalitarian institution ever to arise in the United States. Its operatives in the family courts and the social service agencies recognize no private sphere of life. “The power of family court judges is almost unlimited,” according to Judge Robert Page of the New Jersey family court. “Social workers are perceived to have nearly unlimited power,” a San Diego Grand Jury concludes. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Total immunity [enjoyed by social workers] is absolute power.”

      The divorce regime is responsible for much more than “ugly divorces,” “nasty custody battles,” and other clichés. It is the most serious perpetrator of human and constitutional rights violations in America today. Because it strikes the most basic institution of any civilization – the family – the divorce regime is a threat not only to social order but to civil freedom. It is also almost completely unopposed. No political party and no politicians question it. No journalists investigate it in any depth. A few attorneys have spoken out, but they are eventually suspended or disbarred. Some academics have written about it, but they soon stop. No human rights or civil liberties groups challenge it, and some positively support it. Very few “pro-family” lobbies question it. This is because the divorce regime operates through money, political power, and fear.” — http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/

      –http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1220628/board/thread/148314040

      Have you seen/read END THE FED by Ron Paul? “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
      –Vince Vaughn

      When you think about it, Tucker Max was the Fed’s ultimate creation–a soulless, debased douchebag:

      “My name is Tucker Max, and I am an *beep*

      Think about it–Tucker’s motto @ http://tuckermax.com could be the Fed’s motto:
      “I get excessively drunk via inflating the currency at inappropriate times, disregard social norms (funding feminism/debauchery & debasement of the family/currency/culture/tucker max(educated at the Fed’s University of Chicago’s School of Economics (school of freakanomics) and Duke scholarship)), indulge every whim/war, ignore the consequences of my actions/bubbles/bailouts, fund idiots and posers and tucker-max-like CEOs, sleep with more women than is safe or reasonable/luring them with fiat currency & a fiat-funded bus, and just generally act like a raging darko/douchebag/dickhead.”

      What do you think of Ron Paul’s new book–End the Fed?

      End the Fed: Ron Paul, Bob Craig: Amazon.com: Books

      End the Fed: Ron Paul, Bob Craig: Amazon.com: Books

      Buy from Amazon

      Review for End The Fed
      “Rarely has a single book not only challenged, but decisively changed my mind. “
      –Arlo Guthrie

      “Everyone must read this book–Congressmen and college students, Democrats and Republicans–all Americans.”
      –Vince Vaughn

      Vince Vaughn is a far, far better actor/director/writer than Tucker Max, so it makes sense that Tucker and his jealous friends at the Fed detest Arlo Guthrie and Vince Vaughan as well as art, film, and literature.

      The book has much better reviews and is far-higher ranked than Tucker’s douchey books/film/trailer–Five solid stars!

      Why do you donnie darko douchos/cbs haterz hate on art, the Constitution, morality, goodness, sound money, peace, prosperity, love, the family, kindness, and Ron Paul so much?

      And like the Fed, tucker privatizes all the profits of his private jet while sharing all the risk with his volunteer employees, who work for free.

      “Feminism which espoused “women’s rights” actually has driven femininity underground, torn the sexes asunder, and stripped woman of recognition for being wives and mothers, roles essential to their own fulfillment, to men, and to children and society.” –http://www.savethemales.ca/

      – http://www.amazon.com/Save-Males-Matter-Women-Should/dp/1400065798

      lzozozolz

      LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 8:57 pm Nosecone

      Missing Grace Hopper.

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 3:52 pm Greg Eliot

        I’m not sure we should be celebrating COBOL.

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 9:08 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      lzozozozozoz

      lzozozozozozozoz

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:34 am Zombie Shane

        BETA OF THE YEAR:

        http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3131900/posts

        PORTLAND, Ore. — A crazed cat is behind bars after it attacked a baby and held an Oregon family hostage in a bedroom, forcing them to call 911.

        According to KPTV, the ferocious feline — a 22-pound Himalayan named Lux — “went over the edge” Sunday evening after it was punished for scratching a couple’s 7-month-old baby. The baby was not injured.

        When the peeved pet began charging at its owners, the family and their dog hid in a bedroom, where they called 911.

        “He’s got kind of a history of violence,” the caller said, adding that the cat continued to charge whenever they tried to open the door…

        I GUESS THEY DON’T HAVE 12-GAUGE SHOTGUNS IN PORTLAND.

        OR EVEN JUST 410s.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:56 am Zombie Shane

        RUNNER-UP BETA OF THE YEAR:

        http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3131878/posts

        Dad returns from Afghanistan to learn his kid is Duke porn star

        A US Army physician came home from a tour in Afghanistan to find that his little princess had turned into a porn star. Devout Catholic Dr. Kevin Weeks was stunned by the news, but told relatives he and his wife are still supportive of Miriam, a Duke University freshman who has been having sex on camera to pay for her huge tuition bill…

        EVEN THE FRIGGING ORCS KNOW THAT THIS IS WRONG!!!

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 7:15 am The Burninator

        Good Lord, what have we let society fall into, brother?

        I can understand that sometimes a kid is going to be a rotten kid regardless of how well or hard you tried to bring her up right. But to “Well, I support her choice to disgrace our family name and dignity because she’s my little princess and can do no wrong” is so beyond wrong as to explain completely why princess pornstar turned out as she did.

        Yep, this “man” is man in name only, and certainly not a father worth two shits. Second the nomination.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 8:09 am Amy

        I read that article a little differently. The dad wasn’t interviewed, and it sounds like he’s pretty horrified at what she’s doing. It sounds like the whole family is. Just because they aren’t abandoning her completely doesn’t mean they’re supporting her choices. Do you think the parents should turn their backs completely on her? That seems very harsh.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 8:10 am Canadian Friend

        She is the same porn star we were talking about last week, the one who says being roughed up ( spit in face, slapped around, choked etc ) is empowering

        she says she is a feminist ( goes to some University, into woman’s studies etc ) and some of those feminists agree with her; being abused/roughed up is empowering to women

        go figure…

        It is worth watching the first minutes of her porn video simply for the HUGE contrast between her and the man making the video.

        He is articulate, reasonable, intelligent, logical, even concerned about her kind of like a father would be, he sounds like a decent man, while she is so dim she might be slightly mentally retarded.

        The way she talks ( dumb, not articulate etc… ) I doubt she writes her own material ( that was published online where she “justifies” how a feminist can like to be degraded by men and find it empowering )

        as far as I know the video is not available anymore ( Belle Knox at Facialabuse.com) but we have great people here in the CH communitywho can probably find it elsewhere!

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 9:50 am Uncle Elmer

        She is a feminist parrot. There’s no mocking these people anymore as their self-parody has reached high art. As Conrad intoned in the preface to The Heart of Darkness, a work of art must carry its justification in every line.

        Salon heeds to this advice with today’s hilarious expose’ on white men not taking black intellectuals seriously :

        http://www.salon.com/2014/03/11/the_war_on_black_intellectuals_what_mostly_white_men_keep_getting_wrong_about_public_scholarship/

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:25 am Zombie Shane

        > “She is a feminist parrot.”

        But the dude is an [ostensibly] “devout Catholic” in the frigging USA Army and he can’t even protect his own progeny from falling prey to all of this cultural poisoning by The Frankfurt School?

        What the fuck good is it to be “devout”, a “Catholic”, or a USA warrior if you can’t tell your own God-damned daughter that she’s crossed a line and there’s no coming back now?

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:22 am ivanhoseph77

        http://theothermccain.com/2014/02/27/special-snowflake-belle_knox-and-make-believe-feminist-empowerment/

        EPIC takedown of this girl and her ilks illogical ramblings about porn being “empowering” as well as other feminist buzzwords

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:49 am Grim

        Re: the Duke porn girl, did I miss it, or is nobody going to talk about the horrific YKW-Cathedral aspect of this new low (or high) in ramping up the attack on our daughters?

        This looooooooong interview/story was published on CNN, the lead YKW arm of the US “news.” What’s the point?

        Look at her quote about how it’s freeing for her to do this because she’s bi-sexual, etc etc etc — basically a slut.

        It’s AGGRESSIVE promotion of premarital cock carousel riding TO THE EXTREME to our daughters.

        It’s really FRIGHTENING how far and how fast YKW has taken this.

        Just 20 or 30 years ago, she’d have been KICKED OUT OF THE UNIVERSITY for appearing in a still shot in playboy half dressed.

        See, she’s not actually having any more slutty sex than any other college girl as pretty as her…..that’s really YKW’s subliminal point.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 3:50 pm Greg Eliot

        Just 20 or 30 years ago, she’d have been KICKED OUT OF THE UNIVERSITY for appearing in a still shot in playboy half dressed.

        Excellent point… it’s actually frightening to see how “the center cannot hold”, as it were, has progressed in so short a time period.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:09 pm Zombie Shane

        > “It’s really FRIGHTENING how far and how fast YKW has taken this.”

        Yep.

        The YKW are monsters.

        Utterly nihilistic sociopathic monsters.

        Everything that guys like Jesus and Henry Ford and Adolph Whats-his-name tried to warn us about them is proving to be true.

        Even Stalin hated them.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 11:58 am Scray

        Nah. He’s obligated to love her — he’s her biological parent. Maybe he could have been more stern, but it’s hard to fault a Father who cares about his daughter too much.

        Contrast that to normal beta-of-the-Year fodder — the kind who stay with women who are actively cheating on them, etc. You are never obligated to love a spouse or a girlfriend, which is why the betas in those situations are such pussies — they have no excuse to tolerate such bad behavior.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 12:58 pm dblockz

        irony is she received a full ride to Vanderbilt and turned it down because Duke represented a “spiritual awakening” or some bullshit

        taking women seriously: why america can no longer have nice things

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:26 pm Canadian Friend

        ” … Taking women seriously: why america can no longer have nice things… ”

        I like this

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 8:04 pm Zombie Shane

        > “she received a full ride to Vanderbilt”

        But instead she chose to be on the receiving end of a “full ride” by the Porn Industry?

        In an earlier era – a sane era, before The Frankfurt School closed down all of the sanitariums and dumped the crazy folk right on the damned sidewalk – this poor girl would have been institutionalized.

        Does anyone have a ready copy of the 1st Edition of the DSM, from 1952, to see what it had to say about nymphomania?

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders#DSM-I_.281952.29

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 8:10 am Greg Eliot

        Funny how one of the main culprits in bringing general disrespect to mainstream culture, and specific disrespect of straight white men, now bemoans how science and tech achievements are no longer held in awe, or even interest, by the plebeians he caters to… and whose mentalities of inanity he had a large part in helping shape.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:13 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        When a degraded, debased leftist ascends to the top of a classics department, or when they produce a show on physics, think not that they have come to praise Science, but to kill it and bury it. The main point of the new Cosmos is the same as Family Guy, to destroy all that is manly, heroic, and true, for both Newton and Copernicus favored the gold standard, and thus all of Science must be destroyed.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 8:09 pm Zombie Shane

        > “for both Newton and Copernicus favored the gold standard, and thus all of Science must be destroyed”

        LOL’ed.

        Not only is that hilarious, but when you step back and think about it, it’s actually true, as well.

        Setting aside any talk of Christ as the Logos, The Frankfurt School necessarily must stamp out all logical thought in a nation simply so that they can run all of their cons and shell games and three-card montes without interference from Reason.

        LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 8:54 am Hurr Durr

      I think GBFM would agree with this post

      Why the Current Crisis in Ukraine is a Red Pill vs Blue Pill Superpower Clash

      http://auaria.com/?p=81

      zzzlolzzlollzzzlollzzzz

      LikeLike


  2. on March 10, 2014 at 3:48 pm OralCummings

    Annie Maunder looks like a young Hitler.

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 4:20 pm Director

      No that is the young Adolf.

      LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 4:54 pm irishsavanti

      Did you notice that most of these women look like men? Bears out a point I always made, successful women in the hard sciences are always masculine.

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 6:36 pm Bob

        Career success correlates strongly with free testosterone in the bloodstream in women.

        LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 6:55 am Frank Discussion

      Godwin’s!

      LikeLike


      • on March 13, 2014 at 6:30 am Glengarry

        I hear Mike Godwin joined the Klan.

        LikeLike


  3. on March 10, 2014 at 3:49 pm OralCummings

    ‘Sup wit Caroline Herschel? She look like her vibrator got stuck in her poozie!

    LikeLike


  4. on March 10, 2014 at 3:50 pm Just Some Dude

    She blinded me with science!

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 5:12 pm Director

      The funny thing about Wierd science is that it is entirely plausible that two teenage white boys could pull off a coup de main and reanimate or animate a robot type pleasure droid.

      It’ll probably happen within the next 20 years.

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 5:23 pm Director

        All they were doing was 3D printing with flesh with added AI.

        It’s probably already a standard feature in some Tokyo Lab. More Human Than Human.

        LikeLike


  5. on March 10, 2014 at 3:52 pm Director

    The Men in Science poster. A Snowvalanche of Whiteness.

    Bwahahaha. We all know that Dr Tyson is the cosmic genius, now that we are in Black Science Mumf. He even flew froo space in the PBS documentary yesterday. Flying some Gyptian Shiet.

    LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 8:13 am Greg Eliot

      Can’t reanimate Cosmos without a tip o’ the ten gallon to Sagan and now Tyson… those gas giants of the West.

      LikeLike


  6. on March 10, 2014 at 3:53 pm Gro Haila

    Well, you got to give to Sklodowska and Ms. Noether and maybe Kovalevskaia. Back home, there were 0-1 women on the math olympiad team, 1-2 on the physics team, and 4-5 in chemistry (25 person teams). It’s possible, but rare.

    Of course, the loud shouts of by The Village Crier, intended to make women forget that they traded in their fertile wombs for a pseudo-organic granola bar.MSM for other reasons

    They’re distractible like that.

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 3:58 pm FamilyMan

      Emmy Noether I seriously respect. She is in the pantheon of mathematicians, gender neutral.

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 4:12 pm FamilyMan

        This is seriously cool. WHY do we have conservation of energy and momentum?

        ” if a physical process exhibits the same outcomes regardless of place or time (having the same outcome, say, somewhere in Asia on a Tuesday or in America on a Friday), then its Lagrangian is symmetric under continuous translations in space and time: by Noether’s theorem, these symmetries account for the conservation laws of linear momentum and energy within this system, respectively.”

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem

        LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 5:17 pm Southern Man

        In my previous life as a physics professor one of my colleagues was quite fond of Noether’s Theorem. We taught our students to use it in a variety of ways and they got several publications out of it. It is, sadly, not taught at most departments these days.

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 4:17 pm Director

      Anna Carroll more or less masterminded Union strategy in the American Civil War. A lawyercunt. She buried her nose in the Mercantile Library in St Louis and devised the Tennessee River Plan: a pivotal play in the ACW.

      Grant actually took the credit for the wannabe Coal Burner’s plan.

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 8:15 pm Joe Blow

        The problem with feminism is you have to accept great women scientists because they’re women. That’s pretty fuckin’ condescending, if you ask me.

        I’d rather let their theorem, research, strategy or discovery speak for itself. If it holds up, is accepted, widely used, revolutionary – great! If not, shut up and sit the fuck down with the million men whose dumbass ideas didn’t pan out. Real accomplishment from anyone (female or not) is a lot more impressive to me than the fact that a particular scientist peed sitting down.

        LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 8:53 pm cynthia

        I’d rather let their theorem, research, strategy or discovery speak for itself

        So would most women who are sincerely and genuinely into these fields for the right reasons (aptitude, interest, a desire to help mankind or maximize personal talent). If you hear anything from these kind of women themselves, it’s that they want to mentor young girls who want to be that too.

        The feminists, on the other hand…

        LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 11:50 pm desiderian

        She won’t be a scientist until she’s mentoring young scientists, not young girls…

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 5:34 am The Burninator

        That was a razor sharp arrow of truth, right to the heart. Well said.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:37 am tickletik

        Interesting, but the implication of your noble statement is that you have no interest in mentoring young boys.

        I think it’s a good idea, since you obviously have zero interest in doing so, we will let men only mentor young boys, and we will let women take care of the girls. Just as you will give preferential treatment to girls over boys, we, the men who actually have common sense and balls, will make sure to give preferential treatment to boys over girls.

        LikeLike


  7. on March 10, 2014 at 3:57 pm The Karamazov Idea

    My department decided to honor International Womens Day by subverting gender norms and sending the men from our desks to pack boxes in preparation for moving offices. I felt so empowered.

    LikeLike


  8. on March 10, 2014 at 4:05 pm Peter Connor

    What happened to Marie Curie, top woman in hard science ever? Not PC enough? Her daughter was also a scientist.

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 4:15 pm FamilyMan

      Marie Skłodowska-Curie did half the work on the isolation of radium, her husband and academic mentor Prof. Pierre Curie did the other half.

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 5:19 pm Southern Man

        Which earned her Nobel Prizes in both Physics and Chemistry and an early grave due to exposure to radium and other radioisotopes.

        LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 6:09 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Didn’t she use to bathe in the radiation or something?

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 5:29 pm Libertardian

      Or Ada Lovelace. Of course, people might have heard of her; can’t risk that!

      But women are right to envy scientists and engineers. As that second poster mentions, you get to spend your free time studying while your classmates party and get laid. From your formative years in junior high until you die with a gray neckbeard, society lauds you with accolades like “dork”, “sperg”, and “neckbeard”. Bill Gates screeches nonstop about how there aren’t enough foreigners flooding the country to take your job at 1/3 the pay. And if you don’t develop some business skills, expect to take home around 10% of what your Patrick Bateman boss bills you out for.

      More empowerment than should even be legal.

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 5:37 pm FamilyMan

        I worked too long as an engineer, if I had it to do over I would have gone sooner to the financial sector. Had to, to get paid. Engineers are great at cutting each other down. Idiots.

        But when I was young, math and science always seemed like things I would be ashamed not to understand. Whereas social studies contained a lot of things I would be ashamed to do. (I have less shame about that stuff now, I was naive.) I understand that not everyone has such a strange sense of morality.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:21 pm Zombie Shane

        You sound a lot like me.

        As for the morality of it all – the more I learn about sociopathy, and the folks who use sociopathic techniques to manipulate and destroy the naïve and the gullible – the more I’m all for firing back up the ovens of Auschwitz.

        LikeLike


      • on March 13, 2014 at 6:34 am Glengarry

        “when I was young, math and science always seemed like things I would be ashamed not to understand. Whereas social studies contained a lot of things I would be ashamed to do.”

        Ha, that’s pretty good.

        LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 6:16 pm Hugh G. Rection

        Being an engineer is the kind of white collar work that doesn’t even get you blue collar respect. For all those screeching harpies hating on the white nerds, they don’t want to actually do the work, they just want to run things. They actually look down on the work and the people that do it, as they do with any profession that involves mostly talking or writing prose.

        And the tech companies screw their employees at every turn, they’re even colluding to keep salaries low through not trying to poach employees and more and more immigration. They pay just enough so you can afford the mortgage for the cupboard you have to live in, while they destroy all neighborhood business because they also feed their employees (it’s like assisted living for nerds or still living with mom).

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 8:16 pm Joe Blow

      She experimented with radium which was radioactive, which is an eebil white man thing. Nucular power = bad! Except when Russians or Iranians have it. Scary technology! Bad!

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 8:50 pm Canadian Friend

        Back when Clinton was President they were in talks with Iran trying to dissuade it to move towards nuclear

        and here we are still exactly where we were then, still playing nice with Iran… except for the fact Iran is even a bigger threat now

        LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 11:55 pm Anonymous

        Yes, such a threat their nuclear scientists are assassinated with impunity.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:07 am SGOTI

        Why, they’ve been mere months away from The Bomb since the first term of the Clinton administration!

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:16 am Canadian Friend

        My point is that it seems no one really wants to resolve the issue, other wise it would have been done by now.

        Now why they make this drag on forever I am not sure.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:51 am The Burninator

        Without an enemy in waiting, how could they continue to justify being on constant war footing? Iran serves that role well, never quite doing what they claim it will do, all the while being belligerent and a wonderful source of quotable quotes to keep the all-war-all-the-time happy.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:21 am eyeslevel

        It’s not Iranians behind flooding my country with non-whites.

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 11:02 pm Exurban

      I wondered why no Marie Sklodlowska Curie also. She seems to have been to physics what Margaret Thatcher was to politics. BTW, recently learned that when she discovered an element, she named it polonium after Poland.

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:00 am JCclimber

        Perhaps if you would read the poster’s title, you might understand, since most people HAVE heard of Madam Curie.

        LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 1:50 am Le Corsaire

      I think she is just too well-known to fit the theme of the image. “Look at all these women scientists you’ve never heard of! Why, there must be some sort of conspiracy or something!” Pure conjecture here, but I think most SWPL types have at least heard of Curie, and this meme thing was most definitely not directed at blue collar America.

      LikeLike


  9. on March 10, 2014 at 4:22 pm Eric

    I guess the implication is women have made enormous contributions to science you just haven’t heard of because patriarchy, but picking a few of those names at random I’m not convinced. This is all second tier stuff – if they were men you wouldn’t have heard of them either.

    Is there a female Einstein or Heisenberg or Borlang? So you discovered the bacteria that causes Brucellosis… well, that’s something but it’s hardly on par with being the first to prove microbes exist and can cause disease.

    This reminds me of George Washington Carver. Every school kid learns about George Washington Carver. If he were white even his descendants wouldn’t remember him.

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 4:29 pm FamilyMan

      Noether is at the top level. None others in my opinion. There are some soiid scientists, very good scientists, but only one of really top significance.

      They should have “Science Month” and talk about the accomplishments of 10 top scientists and they could include Noether, legitimately. What a great opportunity to teach the principles of physics, which will actually help the students who could become interested in STEM.

      This generalized gender focus does a disservice to the greatest, like Gauss, and those who are also great, like Noether.

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 4:32 pm FamilyMan

        The work of the great thinkers usually touches such fundamental questions that you can interest high school students in it, at least the top 20%. It touches what they study, if they do any thinking at all..

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:07 am Master Beta

        I would have called Noether a mathematician not a scientist. There’s a difference. Maths and theoretical physics obviously overlap a lot. She was clearly awesome though. Damned clever Jews, even their women are smart!!

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 4:34 pm FuriousFerret

      “I guess the implication is women have made enormous contributions to science you just haven’t heard of because patriarchy, but picking a few of those names at random I’m not convinced. ”

      Nah, the party line is that women would have ended hunger, instituted world peace and cured cancer if it’s wasn’t for the patriarchy not allowing them to be scientists.

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 8:18 pm Joe Blow

        Well, hand it to Annie Maunder. She and her husband did the seminal work on solar activity that will sooner or later be shown to have utterly eviscerated the AGW cargo cultists preaching that global warming is due to your using an SUV. That’s gotta be worth something.

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 5:08 pm Director

      It really is a petrifying realization.

      The darkies hate you and the women are extractive. We band of brothers, we happy few, forgotten as soon as we are buried mostly. Known unto God.

      LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 8:49 pm cynthia

      I guess the implication is women have made enormous contributions to science you just haven’t heard of because patriarchy

      Exactly. And then they use this to try to push their narrative on little girls, which is that you’ll be happier someday with a labcoat and a career, rather than a husband and a family.

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 2:08 am Le Corsaire

        I’m stealing this the next I’m in a conversation with friends who are raising daughters. And I will broach the subject tenderly, a la: Honestly sometimes I feel more regret and worry for the girls growing up these days than boys – at least the boys have plenty of time to recover from the lies they’re fed. The girls, they’ve got about 20-25 years from the time they start hearing the strong/independent-business-suit song and dance until it’s too late and they’re facing the Childless Cat Momma Event Horizon.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 7:43 am RappaccinisDaughter

        Well, I am. YMMV.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 8:37 am Canadian Friend

        Urban dictionary says YMMV is your mother’s musky vagina

        ???

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 8:47 am The Burninator

        YMMV = Your Mileage May Vary

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 8:59 am Canadian Friend

        Thanks

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 9:05 am Greg Eliot

        Urban dictionary says YMMV is your mother’s musky vagina

        This is what happens when you let negroes and South Park SWPLs put stuff on the internet.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 9:24 am Canadian Friend

        I admit I was quite puzzled as to how often someone’s mother’s musky vagina comes up in conversation
        and in what “circles” or demographic group people would talk about it so often that they had to come up with an “acronym” for it to save time and energy

        it crossed my mind that the “cultural enrichers” were part of the answer

        LikeLike


      • on March 12, 2014 at 12:13 am ( @ Y @ )

        YMMV is your mother’s musky vagina?

        And yet my definition of SWPL (Self-hating White Pussified liberal) over at urban dictionary was apparently too “edgy”

        “”Thanks for your definition of SWPL!

        Editors reviewed your entry and have decided to not publish it.””

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 9:19 am cynthia

        I don’t think there’s anything wrong with wanting one or the other. Or figuring out a way to make both work (for that small percentage that can). What I dislike are the lies, and the truth being withheld.

        You might be good at something technical. I probably should have done computer science. You might love your career. I was damn good at leading teams in the military. But a lot of girls just aren’t competitive in those arenas, and telling them that they can be and they should be and denying them the right to develop their own skill sets instead, just because that doesn’t conform to the narrative, is a cruelty.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:42 am Grim

        You have no way of knowing how happy you’d be if you were a mother, my ex girlfriend.

        LikeLike


  10. on March 10, 2014 at 5:04 pm Scray

    http://weeklyworldnews.com/headlines/22529/tiger-back-with-elin/

    lol, would be pretty funny if she got back together with him.

    LikeLike


  11. on March 10, 2014 at 5:05 pm cloudswrest

    International Women’s Day came and went (what, you didn’t notice either?)

    I only noticed because Google had a doodle for it and I thought, “WTF is that for?” and I followed it to see what it was about. There’s never a SWPL issue that Google forgets to doodle, or a traditional one that they don’t doodle.

    LikeLike


    • on March 13, 2014 at 6:38 am Glengarry

      Larry and Sergei should get married. Not a dry eye in the house.

      LikeLike


  12. on March 10, 2014 at 5:07 pm ACG1

    I’m so god damn sick of highly educated yet somehow innumerate morons pointing out right-tail women/minorities and gleefully explaining how they “DESTROY!!!” whatever stereotype is attached to their group.

    If these vapid drones cared half as much about science as they say they do (or had any common sense), they would know that to disprove a stereotype would require sets of unbiased and sufficiently large samples. Of course, we know what happens when you do that- pretty much every stereotype that exists is validated.

    LikeLike


  13. on March 10, 2014 at 5:23 pm Scray

    if all this stuff about the elites and the collapse is true………maybe what they’re trying to do is just hold out a little longer until gene therapy becomes viable. That way everyone can be as equal as they want to be.

    LikeLike


  14. on March 10, 2014 at 5:32 pm whorefinder

    I demand an equalist holiday for female rape!

    I’m not even sure what that means!

    I, at least, am trying make up for the terrible disparity in the lack of white men raping versus black men. Viva la diversity, comrades!

    Rape!

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 5:38 pm FamilyMan

      Coffee cleaned from the monitor, successfully, again.

      LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 6:03 pm Libertardian

      http://www.theonion.com/articles/area-18yearold-demands-right-to-be-sexually-harass,1012/

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:11 am Master Beta

        Love it

        LikeLike


  15. on March 10, 2014 at 5:32 pm Max from aust

    Now imagine how few men on that second poster were;
    -fatherless
    -other than Christian
    – grew up on “whole language reading”
    – grew up in vibrant and violent schools and neighbourhoods

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 7:13 pm FamilyMan

      I think there are a fair number of Jews and other non-Christians on both posters. This would be an interesting research if someone has data.

      But I am sure you’re right on the other points. People of the greatest accomplishment have calm normal lives and don’t spend much time on social issues. They either have one long “boring” marriage, usually with well-behaved children who often achieve well themselves, or less commonly they don’t even marry and devote their lives to science.

      They get their personal stuff settled and have the energy to devote to their other pursuits, rather than extending adolescence into mid adulthood. They also came from similar families.

      LikeLike


  16. on March 10, 2014 at 5:32 pm uncatchable

    Yes! This is what I think EVERY TIME the sexes are compared!

    LikeLike


  17. on March 10, 2014 at 6:01 pm Libertardian

    From the Twitter feed:

    “Multiculturalism will collapse due to its own internal contradictions
    At York University in Toronto, a furor erupted in January over a request by a student taking an online sociology course to forgo an on-campus session, because he said his religious beliefs did not permit casual contact with women. At York, the professor refused to grant the student’s request, believing that it would be a dangerous precedent, labeling women as second-class citizens….”

    Translation: as the multicult bacillus reduces the host to a fifth-world baksheesh shithole, the intramural slapfighting over the rotting carcass by the various tiers of the victimology pyramid will become ever more vicious. We see the first vague hints of this as the media suddenly awakens to the “knockout game” after some poor urchin, no doubt bewildered by his 400 years of oppression, unwisely plays it on someone whose posse has even more sterling victim credentials.

    ‘”It all goes back to the fundamental values the university has put in place that shape the culture — equity, diversity and inclusion — and tying them back to excellence,” said Sandra Carnegie-Douglas, the University of Toronto’s anti-racism and cultural diversity officer. “We look at what we need to do as a university to give students access so they can perform with excellence.”‘

    See, why would you want to be some four-eyed enginerd when you can get a sinecure as an academic zampolit and sit around ejaculating Alan Sokel-esque shit like this?

    LikeLike


  18. on March 10, 2014 at 6:21 pm Steve Johnson

    We do the heavy lifting, too. Whenever there was heavy manual labor, the ladies disappear. And they want to be SEALS?

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 7:23 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Well many women certainly have seals beat on amount of subcutaneous blubber.

      LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 8:10 pm Jt

      Come medical emergency time the white guy by default often becomes the only guy in the room, despite status, training or age. Minority baby stops breathing ….you know the rest.

      http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EfAAbosV8p0

      http://aca.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8511828

      http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aEZdgtDtVo8

      LikeLike


  19. on March 10, 2014 at 6:45 pm Sam Spade

    “Did you know it was a white man who invented latex paint?” -Eddie Murphy

    LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 4:00 pm Greg Eliot

      Did you know Alexander Dumas was part white? 🙂

      LikeLike


  20. on March 10, 2014 at 6:50 pm dr. blockz

    high IQ female autists are indeed valuable contributors to the sciences for having little other value to society

    the rest of these hoes need to realize STEM isn’t a refuge that you flock to as the economy can increasingly no longer support bullshit make-work desk jobs

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 7:28 pm FamilyMan

      Their grades in the freshman and sophomore level math and science courses will help them discover whether they’re cut out for it.

      LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 7:38 am North Vinlander

      A girl doesn’t suffer much disadvantage for being autistic if she’s hot.

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 12:55 pm dblockz

        searching “hot autistic chicks” on the net produces about as many hits as one would expect

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:17 pm White Sausage Fest

        Pretty much anyone who spends time commenting on blogs is borderline autistic, so I wouldn’t be talking.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 4:02 pm Greg Eliot

        Well, one could argue that blogs serve as… heeeeeeeeyyyyyyyyyy!

        LikeLike


  21. on March 10, 2014 at 6:53 pm Will

    This is another off-topic comment so I apologize for that; however, I have a pretty tough situation that I wanted some feedback/advice on (CH your’s would be much appreciated). I’ve maintained an aloof alpha (for the most part) attitude with this 8.5 (high girl’s smv with lots of attention/availability to meeting guys) who is in her younger 20’s for about 8-9 months now where we would get together once every one or two weeks to do something/fuck and then we’ve been on long 1.5 month breaks of not talking. But it’s literally we hang out/fuck then don’t text or talk then a week goes by and i initate another hangout and she is consistently down to drop her things and hang out with me, so we’ve fucked probably 20+times. Weird relationship I know. Anyways, she playfully texted me the night before Valentines day which I didn’t respond to b/c I told myself I was done with her. As much as I don’t want to believe it with how attractive she is, I do think that this one time I ignored her text hurt her…Anyways, this past weekend I was stupid and messaged her (I got a new phone and don’t have her number) and told her we’ grab a bite (shit tested me, passed it) and she was down. We go to the park play catch, and I buy her and me a sandwhich. Then the tricky part. We start hooking up in my room and she stops it before it escalates more and says ‘wait can i ask you a question, what do you want from me…blah blah, you didn’t talk to me for a month, blah blah” i take it as a shit test and pass it but we went further and she was very resistant towards moving on with hooking up aka i only got her shirt off. We had the whole what do you want talk etc..and she even said ‘ok well im gonna go then’ walking to the door only to have me grab her to come back in. Keep in mind also that she was day 10-16 of her cycle. It felt like an ultimatum and I didn’t know how to react. She said almost word for word ‘i want to be more like a relationship and that she wants to be more serious’ i.e. make sure im not seeing anyone else. She also asked if I was “consistently seeing anyone else” which I repllied with “its complicated”. but these shit test responses she did not react well to and caused her to want to leave. Was this situation more of an LTR opportunity or a shit test?

    I want to be in an ltr with this girl but i’m afraid because she is very young and i’ve been hurt before by a similar girl. My question is this: This was the first time she denied me sex ever out of about 20+ times. Therefore, if i start showing more beta (i.e. LTR material) I’ll look like I’m just trying to get the sex she didn’t give me aka desperate for sex. I get attached easily which sucks, but this girl is a keeper and I wanted to know how some of you (CH) would handle this so I can optimize my chances had keeping this girl. AKA what is the next move for me. If i start hitting her up more she will realize and understand her weapon: sex.

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 7:04 pm Mission man

      Overgaming dude.

      She likes you. Now it’s up to you whether you want to give it a chance . If you get burned you get burned. But, you’ll never know if you don’t try

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:11 am JCclimber

        As has been pointed out recently, sometimes showing a little honesty and openness about your own feelings is the right move. You know, as if you were a real human being who has feelings….

        Especially the fact that you’ve been hurt before can be a gold mine. It can quickly turn into a qualification test for her to pass. Just don’t be a beta chump and dump ALL your hurt feelings and longings on her. If she pushes too hard, just tell her that perhaps someday you’ll be ready to talk about it more when there is more trust, just not yet.

        You don’t lock down LTR with pure cocky funny, agree and amplify and so on all the time. A little more beta provider with a strong alpha edge.

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 7:14 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Can you tell us a bit more about her, relationship history etc.?

      LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 7:26 pm FamilyMan

      I agree with the last 2 guys, she asked you a fair question. Even you aren’t sure what you want this to be. Here’s how to be outcome independent and honest.

      In this situation you want to spend more time with her, a more normal relationship. So, propose doing that. If she wants to, she will say yes.

      Interpret her serious questions as a surrender. She is begging you for some commitment. Now if you want it, say yes.

      Shit, she’s a good prospect to tie down, impregnate and live happily ever after. As good as you’re likely to get I suppose.

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 9:41 am CarpeOro

        Agreed. He needs to figure out what it is he wants and then go for it. Is he hoping to just keep moving on from girl to girl adding notches and experiences? The truth is that path always leads to becoming jaded and looking for stronger stimuli. Or does he have interest in a wife and children at some point? From the description, she could be a prime candidate for that. You can come across as alpha and get her submission for a LTR. You have to keep in mind all you have learned so far. The game changes some, but many principal remain the same. Be decisive. Make the plans and be in control without slipping into being controlling. It isn’t easy, but the best things seldom are.

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 7:49 pm Canadian Friend

      It seems she wishes you would tell her you like her and want to be exclusive and start something serious because that is what she wants

      Why else would she need to ask questions before having sex?

      Being beta in tiny doses can help when the goal is a long term relationship.

      I’m not the expert here, this is just my two cents.

      LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 8:39 pm whorefinder

      Tit pics or gtfo.

      LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 9:42 pm Charlie Dont Surf

      She’s forcing you to define the relationship. Do not do that.

      Instead: Get her talking … say nothing – just listen.
      With luck, she’ll talk to a point of emotional exhaustion.
      Don’t blah-blah-blah her – it’s bad form – says you can be ruffled.
      Run silent. Run deep. Ride it out.

      If forced to say something – say; … a little disappointed … everything was going so … at the start of something really ….Tail off every sentence. No conclusions. Keep her guessing. She’s sounding – return hints of something unfathomably deep.

      And enjoy it – comfort her and be kind – You’ve got this.

      Then later, surprise her – Tell her you don’t ever want to go a month and a half without seeing her because you love her..

      LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 8:17 am BuenaVista

      When someone you like asks you if you want to be in a relationship, I think the available answers are “yes” “no” or “I don’t know.” You say you want an LTR and she is offering that. I’m puzzled by your confusion.

      LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 9:28 am Amy

      You’re already in the driver’s seat. She likes you. You don’t have to go all out mushy beta to indicate you’re open to a relationship, just start changing up the routine. If you usually hit her up once a week, this time text her after only a few days, and see if she wants to get together to [fill in nonsexual activity here]. If she wants a LTR, she should jump at the opportunity to spend time with you outside the bedroom.

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 11:21 pm Will

        A little more about her: she’s a hot girl in college–I already graduated–we’ve been on dating for a month and off a lot so it makes sense for her to want some sort of definition to us (she has very very high smv). Amy, you make sense. However, where I get caught off is I feel like it isn’t smart to “define” being exclusive and then all of a sudden start acting all relationshipy…But i’m guessing she just wants to know that I’m not having sex with other girls on the side when we don’t talk some days–so, how do I agree to exclusivity without “defining” us being exclusive. it’s also hard because she doesn’t initiate hanging out very often, but she is always down to do something. Will she be initiating more if I define us as exclusive i don’t get it….

        LikeLike


      • on March 12, 2014 at 11:35 am Amy

        I don’t initiate much either. The key is, does she always respond and always want to get together when you initiate? If so, you’re good. Just increase the nonsexual contact a little. Don’t bring up the RL talk, wait for her to do it. My advice is, no matter what she says, wait for some evidence she wants a RL before committing to not sleeping with other girls. She should want to hang out with you nonsexually. She should love flirt-texting with you even if you’re not going to see each other that day. She should be asking you questions about your life, to get to know you. She should be telling you personal info about herself.

        What you are screening for is the chick who has FWB guilt and just wants to hear you’re willing to be exclusive and “like” her so she can justify the relationship. She is way more likely to cut you off after you show any emotional investment. That’s why you want to see some relationship-type behavior from her before you commit to being exclusive.

        LikeLike


      • on March 12, 2014 at 6:50 pm Will

        @amy, What is FWB? And this girl has asked me personal questions about things I do in my personal life and she 90% of the time agrees to get together (she actually agreed to get togther in some amount of days soon). The problem for me is that I was blind sided/hurt from a very similar type of girl. It’s the problem with high smv girls that I’ve dated. Let me know what you think of my plan: just increase my hanging out with her not in the bed like a relationship. Then she will realize that I am in fact invested and basically exclusive. My problem is I feel like I will always been the one initiating these hang outs which is exhaustive and feels like I am risking too much or revealing to much interest (if that makes sense). Do you think I should agree to the “exclusive title” that she basically offered on the table to me? I feel like this is the only way she will initiate more…am i right? Basically this “exclusive title” seems like a false mentality or something…. what do you think??

        LikeLike


  22. on March 10, 2014 at 7:04 pm The Troll King

    Lol, women in college:

    Twerking to Empowerment

    I am sure she is going to cure cancer one day…lololozzzzzzzzz

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 7:25 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

      Hilarity ensues at 1:27.

      “The reason why I deserve this scholarship is… first an’ foremost, I am a twerk scholar, okayyy?”

      Hahahahahaha!

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 7:28 pm The Troll King

        haha, she has a tumblr too. It is pure gold wrapped in lulz. I posted a long comment with her quotes but this site seems to eat longer comments. SO, enjoy:

        http://misskimari.tumblr.com/post/61826235757/twerking-for-empowerment

        http://twerkscholar.tumblr.com/TwerkResearchPresentation

        LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 7:39 pm The Troll King

        hehehe, lulz. Check out the .37 sec mark on this vid

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 8:44 pm whorefinder

      lmao. the Black Female Rationalization hampster…not very smart, but damn, can it twerk like a mofo monkey!

      No rape for these ugly beasts!

      LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 9:01 pm burke

      she actually says she wants to figure out what it means to express herself in that way. she thinks she’s expressing something meaningful even when she doesn’t know what it is. and she’s the one expressing it. sweet jesus the oppression

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:20 am JCclimber

        She also said she’s twerking to heal herself. And that she’s not just in college to express her hypersexuality. She is a living breathing stereotype of what happens when you admit room temperature people into college.

        LikeLike


  23. on March 10, 2014 at 7:11 pm Cleopatra

    Dear CH,
    If it is your intention to stop the war between the genders, this is not the way. It comes off as a challenge, one that many a feminist will take on.
    Sincerely,
    Cleo

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 7:15 pm Hugh G. Rection

      Dear [na,e], stupid remark, sincerely, [my name] is the new “wow, just wow”.

      LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 7:16 pm FamilyMan

      How will they take on this challenge? We already estimated the size of the respective arsenals at the top of this post, with the proviso that some members of the female lineup would not meet the standards for the male assemblage.

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 7:55 pm Cleopatra

        The same way a man would. I recently worked at a research facility and they actually preferred hiring women. Out of 22 employees, mostly male, only 2 females were left standing after a year. You’d be surprised, the times are changing.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 7:30 am The Burninator

        I’ll help you understand what’s going on here Cleo. When a company prefers to hire women (a thing that would be impossible, under law, if it preferred hiring men), that means that you have a female dominated workplace.

        The HELL of working in a female dominated workplace is exceeded by few things in life, excluding perhaps war or watching a Pauly Shore movie. I’ve worked in a few female dominated company and I could NOT get out of them fast enough. Y’all are impossible to work with, especially if you are a science inclined man it’s worse than being unemployed. Even most females will tell you that working in a mostly woman environment is nothing but a giant cat fight and constant interpersonal politics, 24/7.

        The male dominated engineering and programming shops I’ve worked for have been eminently productive, peaceful and actually rather fun to work in since male camaraderie was not destroyed by female expectations and demands of constant towing the PC line. Not to mention the severe lack of useless meetings, which are a staple of female dominated companies.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 8:30 am Greg Eliot

        Heh, heh… too true.

        About 10 years ago, I happened to be awake one day in the wee hours o’ the morn, when I had one of those voila! moments… wherein the solution to a knotty issue on a current software system presented itself…

        I quickly wrote an e-mail describing the issue and the proposed solution while it was all fresh in my mind… said solution, implemented later than day, worked like a charm.

        I actually won a corporate award and a cash bonus, at a time when management was becoming increasingly stinting.

        The only reply from the customer’s female project supervisor?

        “There’s really no need to write e-mails at 2:00am… I’m not sure anyone’s thought process is as clear as it could be at that hour.”

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 12:58 pm irishsavanti

        Women have NO ROLE in a technology company.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:31 pm Canadian Friend

        Has there always been an “i” at the end of irishsavant or is someone “impersonating him?

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:32 pm Canadian Friend

        …making sandwiches.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 2:12 pm Mom's proud

        Snowing here today. The obese, fugly, wall-splattered, female systems analysts and project mgr’s are waddling to the exits in droves. They never let a good excuse go to waste.

        Of course, it took an hour of chewing cud and ‘herd-mind’ speak prior to the execution of the exit plan. The rousing cackles announced their departure.

        I often stand by the window to watch them leave in hopes that one will slip on the icy surface…again.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:57 am Cleopatra

        No, it wasn’t anything like that. Our boss kept women around b/c he found them to be more responsible. We didn’t have cat fights, no one was stupid enough to bring personal problems to work bc our boss fired people on a whim.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:26 pm The Burninator

        Yeah hon, women didn’t bring personal problems to work or have any kind of interpersonal political thing going on.

        You apparently have worked in the only company in the history of time and space where such a thing was the norm. Congratulations on your spatial and temporal singularity.

        Now if you’ll excuse me, the nation of Uzbekistan, of which I’m king, is calling me to my royal duties.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:37 pm Cleopatra

        I worked at a high profile agricultural research facility. Women and men aren’t these two completely different species that behave and operate in radically different ways. Trust me, the people that argued at work (and these dramas were either male vs male, male vs feminist bitch female and RARELY female between female, this one only happened behind each others backs) were promptly fired. We had lots of work to get through, many eager employees waiting to take our jobs and a no-nonsense boss.

        Le sigh. Sometimes I really DO have dick envy. Do you know how tiresome it is being doubted, shit-tested, and belittled every time I open my mouth? I feel like if I had been born male, getting my point across would be so much easier. Oh wait, you guys get plenty of that crap from the feminists, I changed my mind!

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 11:18 am JB

        This. Especially if there are many women in management. I’ll admit, I had a wonderful woman manager once, but all the rest were hell. Women instinctively blame men around them for everything that goes wrong — no matter how obviously it their fault. When you combine that with female passive aggressiveness, you get a terrible manager. The first time I worked under female manager, it was because she promoted me to management. Six months later she blamed me for her screw up. Then she wrote a complaint against me. It was full of half-truths and distortions. So we went to war. A few weeks later she was fired because it became obvious she was trying to deceive her boss about the report. I’m not saying that no man would try that, but I’ve never had it happen or even heard of it happening. I’ve heard of lots of things like that from women.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 12:10 pm Canadian Friend

        Surveys and studies show that a high percentage of women would rather work under a male boss than a female boss or work with men than with women, that they feel they are treated better by males than females, that females tend to cause conflicts and tensions etc etc

        Links were posted here at CH about a year ago if memory serves

        and almost all women I know have told me the same thing as the above studies say

        No one can stand women not even other women…

        We are not misogynists we are realists.

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 7:30 pm little spoon

      I wish every day were international women’s day, but even one such day is good. I support this and think it is a valuable way of creating awareness across countries.

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 5:10 pm Canadian Friend

        Funniest comment so far

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:08 pm Carlos Danger

        Are you in the floral industry?

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 8:00 pm Canadian Friend

      I can not speak for CH but I don’t think CH is trying to end the war

      winning the battle would be closer to it… in my humble/arrogant opinion

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 9:27 pm Cleopatra

        Let me explain this to you as clearly as I can. Men are on the losing side right now. It doesn’t matter how many girls you are banging, if you don’t reproduce, you failed your only assignment as a human being. Instead of egging women on, adding fuel to the fire, you could acknowledge that they are just as capable of success, but are more needed elsewhere. Or, you could continue challenging women, a challenge which they’ll continue accepting, stealing your jobs, earning your money and proving you wrong(also not birthing your children). I’m just pointing out that it’s not wise to poke the angry bear with a stick.

        LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 9:56 pm Amy

        Cleopatra, the basic argument against female careerism here is not that women are stupid and incapable of professional success, but that women are happier and better off putting childbearing and family first… assuming of course they want children and a family.

        There are different types of intelligence that *tend* to correlate with gender. The paucity of women in the hard sciences supports this. Exceptions exist, but they prove the rule.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 5:53 pm Cleopatra

        The basic argument of this post is that women haven’t achieved as much as men. I’m pointing out that women haven’t achieved as much, yet. So if CH (or anyone else that frequents this blog) is anti-feminist, why are they setting up a challenge? It’s insulting.

        As for men/women having different types of intelligence, I’m a science major. I know that this is false. When I walk into class, I’m not the only girl there. The classroom is an even 50/50 split. I have male AND female professors… I know that girls have to work harder at it, but they are definitely not under-represented in the hard sciences, at least not on this campus.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:05 pm Carlos Danger

        They are nationwide.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:07 pm Carlos Danger

        A science major shouldn’t confuse anecdotal evidence with verifiable scientific evidence.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 9:34 pm Cleopatra

        Show me verifiable scientific evidence that proves that women aren’t capable of achieving everything a man can. You can’t, because there isn’t.

        And I know, I know, look at the posters above. Statistically, it shows that it’s not likely, but I’m telling you that if women shift their focus from family towards career, the numbers will follow. Oh, and the population will decline.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:23 am JCclimber

        So cute.

        Ya know, you need to discover for yourself that there are millions of educated men who aren’t afraid of the “angry bears”.

        We also know that their jobs are built on the sandy foundation of unstable astronomic amounts of debt.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 11:07 am Cleopatra

        This blog has pointed out countless times the upward trend of female masculinization. UPWARD. Where is your masculinity going? Will pointing out that women haven’t achieved as much as men stop them from following the career path? No, it’s going to make them try harder.
        Your call. I’m just a dumb female.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 12:17 pm The Burninator

        The pharmaceutical industry is already putting in extra hours dealing with these career women and their multi-pill cocktails of medication to help them “try harder”. Yet men are still the achievers, even if society no longer lets it be known (it hurts the feminine imperative to admit publicly after all). They seem to be losing this battle, if looked at objectively.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:50 am tang3zang

        Okay, but now back to reality where phenomenal success is nearly all male, and the feminist career-woman types are the one who aren’t breeding and end up with a houseful of cats. These are the people who will slowly die out when they are demographically replaced by normal people, as in, most of humanity outside of suburban SWPL bubbles.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 7:12 am Canadian Friend

        Poking a bear? more like poking a frog…

        As capable as men? Generally speaking NO, women are not as capable as men

        Men are on the losing side? Everybody is losing…Feminism is accelerating the destruction of Western Civilization and the self destruction of women, Feminism has “created” a tiny percentage of “great” women, but it mostly “created” hordes of tattooed up, fat, drinking, smoking, swearing like a sailor whores who have slept with way too many guys and have children from many different fathers – women that are self destructing – women that are losing instead of gaining something from Feminism – women that no decent man will want to marry.

        And those growing hordes of single mothers are ” creating” generations of misfits, this is not my opinion, studies show that the vast majority of criminals and drug addicts were raised by a single mother…

        Somehow the presence of a father tends to make children that are more functional more normal

        There are way more downsides to Feminism than up sides…it is simply taking a long time for people to realize this

        and the above is a short list that barely touched the surface…

        I am not denying here and there, in tiny numbers, there are great women, to an extent my mother is one, she has a very high IQ, a doctorate, is an expert in her field, is a published author yet she was a great devoted mother who never cheated or left my father, but she is an exception

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 3:46 pm Cleopatra

        “mostly “created” hordes of tattooed up, fat, drinking, smoking, swearing like a sailor whores who have slept with way too many guys”

        in a nutshell: feminism created manly/masculine women. And no man in their right mind would marry another “man”.

        Either A) you accept women CAN do your jobs, but shouldn’t b/c it hurts society or B) you continue denying that women CAN do your jobs, which they will continue doing in order to prove that they, in fact, CAN.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 5:58 pm Carlos Danger

        More than anything, a father offers the foundation of an identity independent of the state.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 7:35 am The Burninator

        Oh yeah, they’re so scary.

        Drop all of the “equal employment opportunity” crap and other laws forcing us to associate against our own best interests, and suddenly the “competition” from women would dry up and blow away.

        Y’all aren’t “winning” because you’re better at life, hon, you’re winning because white knight boobs put laws, hundreds or thousand, into place to protect your pasty little derrieres from all of that nasty “I can’t win in an unrigged environment” stuff.

        Now go hold 20 meetings today with other women, chatter about nothing fifty times to “touch base” and “clarify” and call it “work”, and be about your day.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 11:21 am JB

        Heh.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 7:38 am Plumnuts

        If there was ever a warning not worth heeding, it was this. Fundamentally, women don’t create value nor create new fields of understanding, it’s not about to change.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 8:20 am PR

        >>>>>I’m just pointing out that it’s not wise to poke the angry bear with a stick.

        good lord, what will they do? cut off our precious supplies of HR? restrict the flow of fat acceptance scholarship? stop being productive at their government “jobs”?

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 4:06 pm Greg Eliot

        Cut off our precious supplies of HR… now that’s droll.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:04 pm Carlos Danger

        good lord, what will they do? cut off our precious supplies of HR?

        We can only hope. Great joke, BTW. Right up there with Mathew’s recent “turning water into purple drank.”

        LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 9:02 pm Tilikum

      Stop it? Fuck that. A few of us are knocking the dumb beavers back to the stone age.

      LikeLike


      • on March 10, 2014 at 10:02 pm Canadian Friend

        If crushing feminists is what is needed to win this war, I am all for it!

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 12:59 pm irishsavanti

        Crushing feminists alone would do fine for now.

        LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 9:45 am Director

      The gender war will be ended by a Pakistani with four wives, and a machete and a bottle of vitriol. Dumb bitches do not know how good they have it in white man’s civilization.

      LikeLike


  24. on March 10, 2014 at 7:21 pm Anti-whiner

    I’ve heard feminists try to rationalize why women are underrepresented among scientists. As always, their excuses range from bizarre to outright insane, and typically their ideas are so out there that I can’t tell if it’s a genuine feminist or a troll. One such excuse is that women are discouraged from science by the patriarchy or some other make believe force. But if someone is very passionate about science and wants to make valuable contributions to physics, chemistry or whatever field, why would people discouraging him from pursuing it, whether real or imagined, prevent him from succeeding? People who follow their passions will always make it despite whatever challenges they face, and if feminists think women need to receive constant insincere flattery and adulation to be successful scientists, then maybe women aren’t fit to be scientists in the first place.

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 9:35 pm Amy

      There are so many initiatives now to encourage girls in the sciences, the discouraged-by-patriarchy excuse is reaching the point of obvious absurdity. I wouldn’t be surprised if the feminists start quietly dialing these initiatives back. It’s getting too hard to explain why, despite all this extra effort, women are still grossly underrepresented in these fields.

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 7:55 pm Charlie Dont Surf

        Being patriarchal and scientific – I actively discourage my nieces from going into technical fields-of-study. Not because they’re unfit – But because being beholden to decaying brick-and-mortar companies, getting pigeon-holed with a niche skill-set and indexed to diminishing salary – is no way to make a living.

        People who follow their passions will always make it despite whatever challenges they face … That’s the value trap I warn them of. It’s a lie.

        Watch what happens to your passion when you can’t make the rent.

        LikeLike


  25. on March 10, 2014 at 7:21 pm The Troll King

    Lol, she has a tumlr too.

    http://misskimari.tumblr.com/post/61826235757/twerking-for-empowerment

    Sometimes I wonder if the shit I see on college campuses is some sort of epic troll or social experiment or something. But, they are super duper serious and shit about their critical theory.

    Some choice quotes:

    <"1.I am a Twerk Scholar. AndJuicy J is at the forefront of making Twerking mainstream (along with Miley Cyrus) and I have been working hard all year to make the act socially and politically acceptable by creating unity through community engagement and cultural dance expression.
    •I studied The Politics and Culture of Afro-Caribbeans in Bluefields, Nicaragua this summer and did ethnographic research on expressive dance culture with emphasis on how Twerking can be Empowering for costeñas I took a Black Feminist perspective in examining how problematic images of Twerking are for ceaseless sexual objectification and consumption of the BLACK FEMALE BODY (& multiracial female bodies in general). This research was motivated by my experience at UT Austin, a Predominantly White Institution, where authentic self-expression isn’t always “appropriate” and people wear masks, learning to speak and behave in ways that will render them respect and acceptance in the heard of Academia (and Corporate Amerikkka at large). However, I hate corporate american and the reality of accommodating or conforming who I am (& have been) in order to fit into a system that’s built against me. "

    Dat grammar and edumikated peach spatterns…lolzzz.

    <"1.As a radical black female revolutionary and artivist; resisting dominating LOGIC in the context of the hypersexualized representations of black women in the media. I aim not to censor myself for others ignorance. I move to interpret Twerking as a valid form of cultural dance expression that’s appropriate in more places than just racialized cultural spaces, (club scenes) -which have recently been infiltrated, & not just the spaces designated for personal & private freedom. I challenge the normalizing state of oppression and construct alternative discourses which I articulate both theoretically & in practice. "

    This ghetto booty needs to learn to count and use spell check. But damn, she can jiggle that ass. Is it me, or have chicks asses been getting bigger in the last decade? And I don't mean from gaining weight. It seemed like even black girls had somewhat flat asses in the 90s, and white girls definitely did.

    hehehehe, her tumblr is the gift that keeps giving, some more choice quotes:

    <"So why can’t I be free to be me & Twerk wherever I be? Mmm maybe Patriarchy!?
    1.I’ve overcome many trials & tribulations & evolved from a low place of fear & shame to being strong & courageous. I examine the ways performance can be used as public practice to inspire social change and empowerment.
    2.The personal is political. The fact that I’ve chosen to object my own body to be subjected and misread; sacrificing a “formal image” of “respectability” and modest discretion, which is commonly portrayed by “successful” people.
    3.I refuse to limit the value of my self-worth to those categories and representations. I believe in freedom to expression and freedom from negative criticisms based on miseducation, bias and popular knowledge & opinions. I believe I AM more than the labels “slut, strong black woman, Jezebel, ho, bitch, intellectual, classy, credible, hypersexualized, black, woman, etc."

    How da fuq does she have some claim that patriarchy stops her from twerking, especially posting a video online showing her twerk all over campus. I guess the patriarchy police were off duty that day.

    This civilization needs to fucking die already. My entire college degree is now worthless in my eyes. Fuck.

    LikeLike


  26. on March 10, 2014 at 8:14 pm Troubadour

    Speaking of men in science, I started reading “Surely You’re Joking Mr. Feynman” after somebody referenced the chapter where he described getting a clue about how effective it is to buy drinks for a girl. I ended up reading the entire thing, and Feynman earned a place on my list of personal heroes. The book is worth a read:

    http://www.chem.fsu.edu/chemlab/isc3523c/feyn_surely.pdf

    LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 6:15 am Master Beta

      Feynman was a legend. We could really use another Feynman today to set straight the mess that is modern science is becoming.

      LikeLike


  27. on March 10, 2014 at 8:47 pm cynthia

    Women who are in science – and, more importantly, are actually capable of doing science – are not in science because some feminist meme told them they could. They’re there because they can do it, and because they can do it, they never once gave a damn what some (imaginary) white patriarchal system of oppression told them they “should be”. (Does any man honestly care about a woman who genuinely earns her way into the sciences, makes contributions, never ever uses gender as a crutch, and isn’t a bitch?)

    This isn’t about elevating women. It’s about tearing down those women who aren’t toeing the line by taking their ownership of their own accomplishments away. THEY didn’t do it; FEMINISM did. You can’t be exceptional, there’s the collective to think of!

    You men understand this, right? This is fourth-grade girl politics, writ large. It doesn’t get any more female than this.

    LikeLike


    • on March 10, 2014 at 11:11 pm Libertardian

      Hillary’s campaign slogan: Bitch, You Didn’t Build That

      LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 7:25 am The Burninator

      (Does any man honestly care about a woman who genuinely earns her way into the sciences, makes contributions, never ever uses gender as a crutch, and isn’t a bitch?)

      Honestly, no. If she makes great work without using the crutch of “empowerment feminism” or laws or expecting men around her to conform to the feminine imperative and lose their masculinity, etc, then more power to her. That, to my mind, is equality, it doesn’t require recreating reality and restructuring society and culture into some bizarre parody of itself.

      This isn’t about elevating women. It’s about tearing down those women who aren’t toeing the line by taking their ownership of their own accomplishments away. THEY didn’t do it; FEMINISM did. You can’t be exceptional, there’s the collective to think of!

      Fantastic observations, and I hadn’t actually looked at it that way, though I should have. Since females are inherently more collectivist than men it makes perfect sense, but approaching it as a man obscures the Collective Shaming technique going on here.

      You men understand this, right? This is fourth-grade girl politics, writ large. It doesn’t get any more female than this.

      Thanks for the insight.

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 9:39 am cynthia

        A basic rule of thumb is; if you have three women in a room together, and they aren’t best friends or blood relatives (and sometimes, even if they are), one of them is trying to force the other two to conform. If they don’t, they will be subtly and sublimely punished until they do. On the macro scale, this means using organs of industry and state power, along with societal pressure, against the non-conforming. Men don’t really seem to understand this, and it causes a lot of issues.

        Guys, if a woman ever comes to you with a problem with another woman, and the behavior isn’t clearly illegal, listen politely, and then tell her to STFU and get back to work. Similar responses should be employed with legislatures, in regards to “women’s rights” issues.

        I’d say it’s about jealousy, but honestly, I think it’s more about safety and security; if nobody is exceptional, then everyone has an equal chance of securing one of the few good men.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 9:59 am having a bad day

        grade inflation and ‘no child left behind’ accomplish the same thing… if you can’t fail, you can’t get credit for your success…

        LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 4:09 pm Greg Eliot

      Does any man honestly care about a woman who genuinely earns her way into the sciences, makes contributions, never ever uses gender as a crutch, and isn’t a bitch?)

      How big are her tits?

      LikeLike


  28. on March 10, 2014 at 9:01 pm Isaac Asstomouf

    Where’s Hedy Lamarr? Guess they don’t want any, you know, fuckable broads on there.

    LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 4:10 pm Greg Eliot

      +1 on remembering Hedy.

      +11 on any gal named Hedy. 😀

      LikeLike


  29. on March 10, 2014 at 10:10 pm Rum

    Nowadays I work in an office full of women… For to fill them up with hard truths…
    But God Knows the only two women I have known over my long life, that I will be thinking of on my death bed will be 1. A Stone-cold killer psycho -pathic 11/10 bitch from hell who taught me how to commit sex crimes.;; And 2. an Angel sent from God….Absolutely cute. Feels so compatible. She passes out everytime on my lap while her skankoid mother tries to blantantly hook up with gayoid montrose rent-boys.
    It cannot get worse. I cannot want her more.

    LikeLike


  30. on March 11, 2014 at 12:18 am Joe Sixpack

    OT.

    The Poor Man’s CH has a blog:

    http://melbuniblog.com/2014/03/08/a-dose-of-reality-tinderfessions/

    Hopefully RedPill continues its global march.

    Do other countries have their own version of CH/ROK/etc. in various foreign languages? I’d love to see the Swedish Manosphere unlock the inner Viking in legions of metro, P-whipped Swedes as their “Leaning-In” girlfriends and wives watch on in aroused horror.

    LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 1:05 pm ivanhoseph77

      ..

      LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 1:13 pm ivanhoseph77

      Even if only 1/10th of that twitter feed is real the it’s not the global march of the redpill…it’s simply showing the global march of absolute sexual anarchy.
      Read that twitterfeed.
      We we are so far past any attempt at turning back from the semen filled gutters of our society it’s not even funny.
      It’s a poon paradise. Nobody in their right mind would even CONSIDER an LTR or marriage when looking at the stark reality.
      “Virtue has it’s own rewards” my ass.
      As CH would say, “sit poolside, imbibe of the delights, and enjoy watching it burn.”
      There is nothing else to be done.
      Literally nothing.
      That twitterfeed will fell and bludgeon to death any idealized notions you may be absurdly clinging to…

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:59 pm Joe Sixpack

        I’ll admit my post was not written very clearly.

        The global redpill march I was referring to was this was a Manosphere site based out of Melbourne, Australia. I was (and still am) wondering if other countries in their respective languages have their form of the Manosphere, dropping redpill knowledge worldwide.

        The Twitter feed itself is just a byproduct of my linking to an Australian manosphere site in which he talked about the Twitter feed. I am more interested in the extent of the global reach of RedPill knowldege.

        We are in agreement that the TinderConfessions Twitter page is simply a Dear Diary of Female Hypergamy, on display for the world to see. It is nothing more or less than 100,000,000 pedestals shattering,

        Would probably be worth subscribing to, just to keep things contantly top-of-mind in perspective when interacting with all women. A constant drip of reality, every time your smartphone tweets.

        LikeLike


  31. on March 11, 2014 at 12:28 am Robert in Arabia

    I know a Roumanian female physicist with four children and many publications and a husband. Does anyone know an American like her?

    LikeLike


  32. on March 11, 2014 at 12:38 am Philippe Rushton

    Black History Month reminds me of my favorite line from What Its Like To Teach Black Students. “This was diversity history where every black cook had a page on his contribution to how the west was one’.

    Who got dem shine shoe? Who got dem ahine rim? Whp got dem shine grill?

    LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 9:49 am White Sausage Fest

      The weirdest thing about that article was the bit about the German exchange student. He went overseas to attend a 90% black high school. LOL

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:03 am thwack

        Thats because to Germans, black Americans are American, not African; they know the difference.

        Growing up we had a German college student stay with us for a week while she worked on a documentary.

        Germans study everything, thats why they are so smart.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:08 am White Sausage Fest

        It’s genetic and you know it.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:41 am thwack

        Their curiosity?

        It was years later I discovered Germans are famous for that behavior:

        .http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90OrQIpF60o

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:53 am White Sausage Fest

        The intelligence.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:54 am White Sausage Fest

        Actually the whole personality.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 11:07 am thwack

        White Sausage Fest

        It’s genetic and you know it.
        —————————————————————————————–

        Ok, If you say so.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:03 pm irishsavanti

        Have to disagree thwack. To Germans, black Americans are blacks who live in America. Trust me on this.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 2:10 pm thwack

        irishsavanti

        Have to disagree thwack. To Germans, black Americans are blacks who live in America. Trust me on this.
        ———————————————————————————————-

        In contrast to black people in Africa who identify according to tribe?

        Africans brought to the U.S had the “tribe” beaten out of us; therefore, all thats left is American.

        The black man and the red man are the true Americans. The cracker is an alien who will soon go the way of the white buffalo.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 1:18 pm whorefinder

        lol. Ni99ers are ni99ers, boy. You actually drank the kool-aid…not surprising. Everyone with two eyes to see can tell the difference between a human and an ape like you.

        Rape!

        LikeLike


  33. on March 11, 2014 at 1:09 am Eliezer Ben-Yehuda

    from the archives of Stock-Syndrome meets Hybristophilia:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/kidnapped-nuns-bond-with-alqaida-captors-we-werent-harassedat-all-they-were-kind-and-sweet-9182832.html

    LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 11:40 am JB

      No, that’s the way Arabs are. They have the sweetest personalities you would ever believe. The are like Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde. They will invite you into their homes and feed you, and you know they are truly enjoying your company. Then, they will start talking about what a great guy some terrorist is. They don’t even realize that should make you enemies. Then, they will send you off loaded down with presents and make you promise 17 times you’ll visit again soon.

      They probably made the nun feel truly like a guest. But if needed, they would have killed her.

      LikeLike


  34. on March 11, 2014 at 1:34 am Le Corsaire

    Anybody else catch this today? Social Distrust Blooms Among Millennials, But Where Are Its Roots?

    For a brief moment, when they mentioned “growing racial diversity – 43 percent of millennial adults are non-white” as a potential cause of this all-time-high in social distrust, I thought (beyond all reason) that the reporter might touch the SWPL 3rd rail of Diversity + Proximity = War

    But no. Being NPR, of course that figure was spun to mean that the non-whites are the ones feeling copious amounts of social distrust, because hey, Victimhood Forever.

    LikeLike


  35. on March 11, 2014 at 1:43 am tang3zang

    Why are men are disproportionately represented in almost everything. Because gender equality is a social construct.

    LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 9:33 am Director

      Society is actually a racial construct.

      Civilization ditto.

      The truth is gender biased.

      LikeLike


  36. on March 11, 2014 at 2:35 am Men In Science | Truth and contradictions | Sco...

    […] International Women’s Day came and went (what, you didn’t notice either?), and feminists of all 152 gender persuasions celebrated in style.  […]

    LikeLike


  37. on March 11, 2014 at 3:03 am Opus

    Exactly the same happens in Music: the endless attempts to present 10th rate 19th century female composers as somehow unfairly treated and with more excuses than a school boy late with his homework as to why there is so little of it. Now, my taste in music is so bad that I rather like some of the present crop of female composers but the big difference between them and the men is that male composers good or bad have a tendency to go out on a limb, which is why there has never been the female equivalent of a Sorabji with his four or five hour Symphonies and Concertos – largely unpeformed and perhaps largely un-performable, though hugely admired by a select group of enthusiasts; why no female composer ever wrote a Tetralogy of Operas (like Wagner with his ‘Ring’) and why no living female composer is presently working on a twenty-four hour Opera (commenced in the 1980s due for completion in the 2030s) setting Dante’s entire Comedia as French composer Didier Marc Garin is presently doing.

    IWD is a Marxist invention from 1910, which most women seem unable to observe is ultimately anti-male and anti-family and thus ultimately anti-women.

    LikeLike


  38. on March 11, 2014 at 6:02 am Toby

    Despite the celebration, I notice that there is not a single one about Women’s Month in my FB newsfeed.

    Shocking!

    LikeLike


  39. on March 11, 2014 at 7:29 am Uncle Elmer

    You are wrong on this topic. There are many fine women scientists. If you go to the Getty Images website and search “women scientists” you will find lots of good-looking women in lab coats working in gleaming white facilities, many of them peering intently into test tubes and micro-scopes, or sometimes even writing backwards on glass with lipstick while handsome defocused black scientists watch in awe!

    LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 9:41 am Uncle Elmer

      What I don’t get though is the gay stock photographer fixation on megaphones. Maybe because it is both phallic and vaginal at the same time. There are over 4,000 megaphone-based images in the Getty database. In my life I have witnessed people using a megaphone about 3 times total.

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 9:44 am White Sausage Fest

        I’m scratching my head over your megaphone comment.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:18 am thwack

        is he German?

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:19 am Uncle Elmer

        Oh I don’t think so :

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 10:22 am White Sausage Fest

        How is a microphone phallic and vaginal?

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 12:00 pm Uncle Elmer

        It has a phallic horn and a vaginal cone.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 4:13 pm Greg Eliot

        I dunno… I always imagine a dog’s head coming out of one.

        LikeLike


  40. on March 11, 2014 at 7:32 am epochehusserl

    Cleopatra

    Let me explain this to you as clearly as I can. Men are on the losing side right now. It doesn’t matter how many girls you are banging, if you don’t reproduce, you failed your only assignment as a human being. Instead of egging women on, adding fuel to the fire, you could acknowledge that they are just as capable of success, but are more needed elsewhere. Or, you could continue challenging women, a challenge which they’ll continue accepting, stealing your jobs, earning your money and proving you wrong(also not birthing your children). I’m just pointing out that it’s not wise to poke the angry bear with a stick.
    ——————————————————————
    What women have to accept is that men dont want to have children because family and children are liabilities for men at this point.

    LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 9:31 am Director

      There is no upside to being a dad at this point.

      It’s painful to point out, I have three. Whatever pride you take in them, the woman is in a position to take them away from you at an instant. The kids also tend to side with mom in all disputes. I’m not a divorcee btw.

      The system is set up to vampirize men.

      LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 9:40 am thwack

        Director

        The kids also tend to side with mom in all disputes.
        ————————————————————————————————–

        Huh?

        What kind of faggy world is that?

        What country you from?

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 12:29 pm Grim

        What ain’t no country I ever heard of!!!!! Say “what” again!!!!!

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 11:21 am Cleopatra

        I’m really sorry to hear that. The pain sounds unimaginable. I’ve never thought about this issue from a man’s perspective.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 12:16 pm Canadian Friend

        ” … I’m really sorry to hear that. The pain sounds unimaginable. I’ve never thought about this issue from a man’s perspective…. ”

        Unfortunately very few women are able to see it from the man’s perspective.

        That is why there is fierce opposition from us men to concede more power to females

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 2:05 pm Cleopatra

        I know this very well. There is a way out of this mess.
        The thing that feminists don’t realize when they say “There’s so many more fish in the sea. I’ll just divorce my husband and move on to the next guy,” is that there isn’t. That’s the lie. For every female in the population, there is just one male. That’s why the way traditional marriage was set up before worked. The more dominant, bigger, smarter, sex worked, while the other nurtured.

        If in previous posts I’ve been torn about becoming career woman, it’s because I truly believe the above statements.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 5:02 pm Canadian Friend

        ” … the way traditional marriage was set up before worked. The more dominant, bigger, smarter, sex worked, while the other nurtured. … ”

        a couple of days ago you said of being a wife and mother that it was slavery

        ??

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:46 pm Carlos Danger

        For every woman there is about 0.3 eligible men, because judging from the divorce statistics, 70% of men are not worthy of being retained in marriage by their wives. Moreover, this 70% figure was also true during the French Revolution, when women were first allowed to divorce freely.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 9:31 pm epochehusserl

        There really is no way out of this mess now because of both feminism and the anti-discrimination brigade. The elite and polis are so out of touch with reality concerning real gender differences (not to mention human nature and economics) that meaningful dialogue is impossible.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 12:34 pm Grim

        “Son!!!!!” she said. “Have I got a little story for you!!!!” “What you thought was your daddy, was nothing but a fool!!! While you were sitting, home alone, at age 13, well your real daddy was dying!!” “Sorry you didn’t see him, but I’m glad we talked!!!!”

        This is what Eddy Vedder’s mom told him in real life. She had cuckholded her husband (Eddy’s dad is the guy she slept with.) Eddy actually met his dad, but was told he was a “friend of the family.” He was a neighbor.

        This perfectly illustrates the thinking of women. Their inability to use logic or understand how they hurt men and also their coldness and lack of love for their own children.

        “Sorry you didn’t see him, but I’m glad we talked!” lzolzozlzozzo

        I need not point out to the male readers the 3 distinctly ridiculous things about this sentence. As if her fucking feelings and whether she’s glad matter one iota at that moment.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 2:28 pm thwack

        One girl said she was annoyed her mom wouldn’t even spend the time and energy to get knocked up at a biker bar by “some dude”.

        LikeLike


      • on March 11, 2014 at 6:41 pm Carlos Danger

        Women are generally incapable of empathizing with men.

        LikeLike


      • on March 12, 2014 at 1:04 am ( @ Y @ )

        My wordpress knowledge is not up to scratch. How come Cleopatra, scray and Director have the exact same avatars?

        LikeLike


  41. on March 11, 2014 at 8:03 am Grim

    NUANCED COMMENT: While the man response one is awesome, I don’t like the “anonymous” comment that is actually slightly pro-hot-women in that it lets them off the hook for their privileged lives *that they fail to even acknowledge let alone be thankful for*. It’s like, “who can blame a hot woman for not working hard at doing something useful.” Hot men still have to work. Even a total hottie man (male 8 or 9) cannot get the “early retirement” plan like a female 8 can. In other words, another stereotype that’s wrong, actually, is the nerdy male scientist. Plenty of male hard science workers (and workers in other fields) are 7s and 8s, but they still must contribute to society in order to have shelter, food, and water.

    But the comment (in the meme) is indeed accurate in the female mind. A female HB8 or above feels herself entitled to be a princess and worry only about handbags and “fashion.” A male 8 will still want to (and is required to) achieve something using his brain.

    LikeLike


  42. on March 11, 2014 at 8:40 am Greg Eliot

    Henceforth I will refer to that poster as Babes On Parade.

    LikeLike


    • on March 11, 2014 at 11:00 am Amy

      Nice reference. That’s an apt film for the Chateau.

      LikeLike


  43. on March 11, 2014 at 10:01 am Harem is Best

    Game for science clam.

    White coat = more open to logic. Open to rational discussion on the mechanics and pleasures of fucking. Intrigue based not totally on emotion and hampster, but on the possibility for discovery and cost-benefit analysis as well.

    Perky D cup swimmer’s bodies with boy hair cuts? Fine if you need it right now. And they never want to cuddle.

    LikeLike


  44. on March 11, 2014 at 10:17 am ivanhoseph77

    Off topic but very germane to the Chateau…

    Sheryl Sandberg and the Greivance Bridgade is out in full force today trolling for more victims of heinous microaggression that might end up with someone (though never of my ilk – white and male) having hurt feelings. (I believe the Stoics solved the problems of “hurt feelings” and other emotional disturbances 2500 years ago by appealling to the use of strictly rational thinking…but i digresss…)
    The elite Intolerati (who in classic orwellian doublespeak claim exclusive rights to define and use the word …”tolerant”), have ramped up their efforts at thought control by wanting to BAN the word “bossy” being used to describe….bossy girls. Apparently using the correct word to describe someone who is being aggressive, demanding, and undeservedly entitled is outrageous oppression that can lead to horribly negative lifeoutcomes. Let’s celebrate and encourage latent narcissism instead! That can only have a positive outcome, no?
    Once again normality is being put through the liberal reality inverter in their attempt to create a “utopia” of politically correct thought and speech through increased control of the individual and lessening of freedoms. I mean everyone is a unique and fragile snowflake that must be protected by their “betters” since they can’t possibly have the ability to work shit out on their own, right?
    Liberals – infatilizing others since…

    LikeLike


  45. on March 11, 2014 at 10:56 am ivanhoseph77

    https://twitter.com/tinderfessions

    Tinderfessions will cure you of any betaness instantly. It will also cure you of any lingering fondness for LTR’s or marriage.

    It shows the global march of absolute sexual anarchy in stark relief. We we are so far past any attempt at turning back from semen filled gutters of our society it’s not even funny.
    It’s a poon paradise. Nobody in their right mind would even CONSIDER an LTR or marriage when looking at the stark reality.
    “Virtue has it’s own rewards” my ass. As CH would say, “sit poolside, imbibe of the delights, and enjoy watching it burn.” There is nothing else to be done. Literally.
    That twitterfeed will fell any idealized notions you may be absurdly clinging to

    LikeLike


  46. on March 11, 2014 at 12:05 pm Scray

    ‘Fat girls doing fat girl things.’

    Best comment:
    ‘sticky fingers says at March 10, 2014 at 4:51 pm
    looks like my tinder feed’

    LikeLike


    • on March 12, 2014 at 10:03 am no

      family guy solid…..

      LikeLike


  47. on March 11, 2014 at 12:14 pm whorefinder

    You know what else came and went?

    Me.

    Rape!

    LikeLike


  48. on March 11, 2014 at 12:23 pm McGonzo

    Interesting to note that all the “Women in Science that you should know” were thin. Not one waddling heffalump amongst the lot.

    LikeLike


  49. on March 11, 2014 at 1:16 pm Grim

    lzozlzolzlzlzlzl here’s the girl that was invited into the losats cockasz pit gby the pilot

    https://www.facebook.com/jonti.roos?fref=ts

    zlozlzozllll HB9

    wonder if I’d have been invited?

    more female privilege I guess

    LikeLike


  50. on March 11, 2014 at 1:22 pm Grim

    CH read this: http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-cockpit-companions/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

    jesus fucking christ. Arab beta-but-I’m-a-pilot game.

    slozlzzzlozzl

    he fucking facebooked her after the flight.

    sum: 2 Arab pilots invited two 17 year old hotties they saw in the line at the airport to ride the entire international flight in the losats cockas pit during the flight.

    one is one of the missing plane pilots

    Arafhd akfazie al Endiri Jabbar

    zlzolzozl

    LikeLike


  51. on March 11, 2014 at 1:54 pm notalifeguard

    http://www.today.com/health/princeton-mom-says-its-all-women-find-husbands-be-control-2D79357030

    LikeLike


  52. on March 11, 2014 at 6:35 pm Severn

    Only your patriarchal reader couldn’t be bothered to find pictures of actual male scientists. It’s just a repeated pattern of colored squares.

    You lazy shitheads, never change.

    LikeLike


  53. on March 11, 2014 at 7:48 pm wolfie65

    So…howgh cum all the girl scientists in moovees are HAWT and these are…the opposite?

    LikeLike


  54. on March 12, 2014 at 4:48 am v8mile

    Does anyone have a higher resolution of the male scientists image? When I enlarge it, all I see are pixels, not actual face of any male scientists.

    LikeLike


  55. on March 12, 2014 at 10:02 am no

    http://budlight.whipnet.com/

    LikeLike


  56. on March 12, 2014 at 8:31 pm Castaigne

    Dude, that male scientist macro? You got trolled by Manboobz. Whoever made that graphic did it to set you up.

    [CH: Don’t underestimate the level of clinical spergatroidery online. There are tard autists who think pixellated humor invalidates reality.]

    LikeLike


  57. on March 30, 2014 at 6:14 am Tinderfessions: “The global march of absolute sexual anarchy” | Aggregation Test

    […] If even half the stuff on Tinderfessions is true, the republic is hurtling towards its doom faster than anyone thinks. Reader ivanhoseph77 writes, […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Libertardian on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    gunslingergregi on Manifest Depravity
    Lance Draper on Beta O’Rourke
    gunslingergregi on Manifest Depravity
    PDB on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    PDB on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    gunslingergregi on The Confound Of Silence
    gunslingergregi on The Confound Of Silence
    gunslingergregi on The Confound Of Silence
    gunslingergregi on The Confound Of Silence
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hivemind Is Real
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • Manifest Depravity
    • The Diminishing Returns Of Anti-White Virtue Signaling
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Revolutionary Spirals To Civil War 2
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: