Ever notice how emphatically the few married feminists proclaim the awesomeness of the males who settled for their post-slut carcasses as if this was some sort of evidence proof of the superiority of the cock-hopping, mimosa-fueled lifestyle? COTW winner Paul Murray, replying to another commenter, explains the pathological narcissism that shapes the scarred psychologies of manjawed feminists,
There’s a recurrent use of “my wondeful husband” in Salon and other femcunt territories.
They never say “my SEXY wonderful husband”.
They don’t see people in their lives as full human beings. They see them as a role being played in their lives. The actor is replaceable – it’s the role that matters. The only non-replaceable actor is herself, the star of the show.
Married feminists of course will never admit that the scalzified losers who settled for them aren’t sexy, exciting men who make them swoon with love. To admit that would be to surrender everything they’ve invested in their egos.
***
Better to be thought an alpha male than to speak loquaciously and remove all doubt. COTW runner-up winner Rick Derris ponders what an Obama/Putin fireside chat would sound like,
No doubt [terse game] can apply to international relations as well.
I am sure Barry talked for 89 of the 90 minutes during the phone call he had with Vladimir “Nyet” Putin this weekend.
Barry hears that a lot from Michelle, too.
The Obama / Putin stuff has gone beyond parody at this point. Our country and its leaders and its voters are so uniquely unqualified for the times we live in.
LikeLike
The US is at heart a deeply unserious place.
LikeLike
“The Obama / Putin stuff has gone beyond parody at this point.”
No kidding.
Barack Obama bows to the king of Saudi Arabia, who is leader of a nation where people are stoned to death for homosexual sex. Meanwhile Obama castigates Putin for signing a law that makes it illegal to indoctrinate minors with pro-gay propaganda, even though sodomy in private has been legal in Russia since 1993.
You call it beyond parody. I call it obscene aggression.
LikeLike
You call it beyond parody. I call it obscene aggression.
All the more because it has the bad taste of passive aggression.
Barack Obama bows to the king of Saudi Arabia, who is leader of a nation where people are stoned to death for homosexual sex.
Hell, I’ll give him that one.
LikeLike
Most Westerners have been deluded into thinking that being nice and morally self-righteous as signs of power, which it may very well be in comfortable, spoiled societies. In the rest of the world, it’s just unfounded arrogance. No amount of shaming is going to stop Russia or China from acting in their own self-interest, just like no amount of snark stops you from getting your face put in the ground.
LikeLike
It was my pleasure to offer up said comment
LikeLike
Comment at Sailer’s :
“What we offer to potential client states is Miley Cyrus, tattoos, gangsta-rap, neo-liberal economics, gay marriage, trans-sexualism, color revolutions, and demographic suicide. We are the Weimar Republic with aircraft carriers and a surfeit of insufferable arrogance.”
LikeLike
Are there any photos showing the pairings of the femcunt groom and her blushing, scalzified bride?
LikeLike
Heh. Coming soon: weddings involving men in wedding dresses and women in tuxes. Count on it.
LikeLike
Often a gambling man myself, nevertheless I’m not giving odds against on that one.
LikeLike
…wonder what a feminist moms beauty contest would look like…
LikeLike
Quick Q.
Oftentimes when I talk to girls, they’ll point out my baby face; it’s an obvious shit test. It’d be nice if it appealed to their motherly instinct and drew them to me even more, but that isn’t the case.
Possible replies?
Last time a girl said it I replied, “yeah, I should really be dating Christie Brinkley.”
Not the best, obviously, but it was on the spot and moved things along.
Also, as I work on gaming taller girls at college, situations often occur where another another taller guy will try to butt in and cockblock me. What’s a good way to reframe and move the interaction back into my favor?
LikeLike
i always thought baby faces where chick magnets…but maybe it’s just the mild shit tests that are passed like you said..
LikeLike
Ask her if she’s worried you don’t like older women.
LikeLike
Props for being the only guy answering what he actually asked. And you can ask her if he’s her boyfriend. It’s the best one size fits all statement you can make, I think. Then you can reframe everything he says as him pretending to be the jealous boyfriend.
LikeLike
Women aren’t as fixated on looks as men are, but there are a few things that appear to be hardwired. Baby face is one of them, height another.
I’d say just treat it like a shit test; understand it’s not one of your assets, don’t acknowledge it, and accentuate the qualities you do have. Alternately, you could try growing a beard. That seems to work well for some guys.
LikeLike
pretty sure cynthia lady…that younger girl like the softer faces…and prettty sure cynthia lady…you are not a younger girl……
LikeLike
I’m a 28 year old girl, who was once a 16 year old girl. So yes. I know what I’m talking about.
There are two types of baby faced guys out there. One is like Charlie Hunnam, where they’ll either grow out of it or are still sufficiently masculine to where it doesn’t matter that much. Then there are the baby face guys like Michael Cera, who are just plain screwed in the looks department.
There’s a certain type of girl that find that latter type of guy attractive, and trust me, you probably don’t want much to do with them.
LikeLike
I am proud to say I actually had to look these people up. I think the problem in the latter case is puniness and ugliness that also happens to be delivered on a barge of lingering adolescence. Fresh shit is like old shit until its completely dried and blown away without so much as a fecal trace.
Had he merely been youthful looking then his “miserable lot” would be to find company among younger women, a ruthless punishment at 14 when 10 year old girls are as flat as planks. In latter years its the main plot line of Twilight. When man of a 100 years gets to masquerade as a genius amongst his peers, then he will skim more than the froth.
LikeLike
I am proud to say I actually had to look these people up.
And I salute you for it.
I’m proud to say that, although normally being of a naturally-curious mien, I didn’t even bother to look those names up.
LikeLike
Charlie Hunnam’s character on Sons of Anarchy is two years older than he is, and it works. I don’t think of him as a babyface.
LikeLike
Have you seen him without the beard? Different person. Possibly a bad example of baby face, but a great example of how facial hair can completely change a man’s face.
LikeLike
(Why does wordpress keep eating my comments?)
Yes, I was once a 16 year old girl. So yes, I know what I’m talking about.
Girls don’t like boys like Justin Bieber because he’s hot. Girls who like Michael Cera have emotional issues that you do not want to get in the middle of.
LikeLike
….a very long time ago..
LikeLike
I’m 28. And yes, I lived through the worst of the 90s boy band era. What are you even on about?
LikeLike
You need to launch some footballs.
LikeLike
I have no hope this comment will make it out of moderation or whatever other problem exists, but…
Generally a babyface is not good in a man. A good response to the shit test of having it pointed out is “it helps get the girls into my van, so I can get them tied up” or something similar.
LikeLike
What even constitutes a baby face?
LikeLike
Larger eyes, weaker chin, weaker jaw, less prominent cheekbones — soft features.
LikeLike
Not angular.
LikeLike
With rare exception (unless he was purposely sleep-deprived and roughed up by make-up departments) DeCaprio always struck me as a babyface… which is why I couldn’t take him seriously in most roles.
LikeLike
So basically slav and polynesian features, also sub-saharan africans
LikeLike
How bout pink skin?
LikeLike
well ok then…you seriously write like you are 48……where are your pics missy..
LikeLike
How the fuck does someone write like they’re 48
LikeLike
“I’d say just treat it like a shit test; understand it’s not one of your assets, don’t acknowledge it,”
This is not entirely true. All it means is that you have a unique quality and instead of running away from it embrace it.
If you have a feminine face then grow your hair longer and be clean shaven and dress stylish.
Most women don’t like soft faces but there is a minority that loves it. HIppie/Alternative/Hipster chicks dig feminine faces and they actually one group of people that aren’t obese in droves.
LikeLike
Sure, that’s absolutely true (even if some of those girls are friggin’ insane). But if you’re self-conscious about some aspect of your appearance you can’t change, or if you just don’t like it, the worst thing you can do is draw attention to it. Confidence is important.
LikeLike
I wouldn’t say I have a feminine face, just a youthful looking one. Runs in the family. I’ve been told on more than one occasion that I look like Leonardo DiCaprio.
And I’ve said before that I’m short, so the two aren’t a good mix. I dress well and am more fit than most though, so it’s not the death-knell that many say it is. It just makes things a little tougher.
Really makes me wonder sometimes, though. I know I’m good looking and have a good personality, but how much ass could I be getting if I was taller? This is obviously all I’ve ever known, and I do fine, but from the girls who have outright rejected me because of height alone, it makes me think I could really be rolling in it if I had a few more inches on me.
LikeLike
??? I am pretty happy with my height of 1.70m / 5’7 ,though if I were u I would use some of these interesting methods, I only knew you could change ur height with technology since June 2013, when I read about the Japanese woman that want to be a “French doll” and part of her transformation was making herself taller ,with something like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limb_lengthening_methods
LikeLike
Hi FuriousFerret,
I’m glad I found you again. You won’t remember me, but I was a girl in a dead-end relationship in her mid-20s, who commented here. Over a year ago on this site, I asked for advice on my bf who refused to marry me after having been together for 5 years in a cohabiting relationship. His reason was that he didn’t believe in the institution and felt like it wasn’t necessary. You told me to break up with him right away unless he willingly was able to swear up and down that he would be with me and take care of me for the rest of his life, which he didn’t do to a degree that I was comfortable accepting. You said that he’s “not the marriage type” only until he finds someone he’s willing to marry.
I did break up with him a couple of months later, and have since then found a man who is as crazy about me as I am about him. I see no commitment aversion from him and things are absolutely perfect. We both try out hardest so that he feels like and plays the part of the man, and I as the woman. It’s the best relationship I ever had, and your comment really clicked with me.
I just wanted to say, thank you. You helped a girl out.
LikeLike
cynthia: “Alternately, you could try growing a beard.”
Stopped by two girls as I was leaving a club, Her: ‘why are you leaving’, Me: ‘Ah, I’m usually in bed at 9pm.’ Her: ‘No, I don’t believe it, you got a beard and everything’.
LikeLike
It’s been my experience that most women don’t like beards… but them that do, really, really like ’em. 😉
LikeLike
A goatee really works wonders, if you have the right kind of facial hair color. My mustache portion is dark brown, but the chin and under my lip portion are gray, which makes a great effect that women seem to be really turned on by. Think of Sean Connery in the first Highlander movie back in ’86 and you’ll have a more or less accurate picture of what I look like in a general sense today (in fact I’ve had several women make that comparison to me unbidden). Women basically throw themselves at me.
Contrasted to not having a beard, which I was doing a few years ago, and the difference is rather plain to see. I was still being flirted with but nowhere near as much nor as “in my face” blatantly.
Full beards though, yeah, don’t know many women who are into that, but as you say the ones that are really are.
LikeLike
The Burninator: “Women basically throw themselves at me.”
That must be hell!
LikeLike
‘What’s a good way to reframe and move the interaction back into my favor?’
Depends where you are with her. If you’re in A3 with her, then this guy becomes your best friend because the more he tries, the better you look. When a guy tries to AMOG based on height, you can be sure of two things: he probably lacks any real game — that’s why he’s targeting ‘easy’ pickings — and as a result, his AMOGging will just be him qualifying himself. You’ve already ‘locked in,’ so all you have to do is remain non-reactive. Don’t look at him — always be focused on her. Your body language should be toward her, never toward him. Conversationally, be pleasant, but don’t open up — let him run his mouth/dancing monkey.
If you’re lucky he will have a meltdown that will culminate in him eventually trying to touch/grab the girl and her looking mortified (because he’s been so tryhard and DLV’d himself) where you can step in and be like ‘hahaha hey man, take it easy, I know we’re all a little drunk but you know….’ and look like a boss.
If you aren’t in at least A3, lol…just walk off, brother. I could tell you the hail mary bag of tricks, but really, it’s better to just cut your losses instead of sticking around and trying to compete. Abundance. Abundance.
‘Oftentimes when I talk to girls, they’ll point out my baby face’
Ya. I have youthful features too…only mannish features are high cheekbones and jaw. I love it. Defy expectations is the answer.
‘You’re super cute….’
‘….and real trustworthy. I’d never lie to you.’ smirk.
If you bring out your alpha while having a softer appearance — supplemented by little things like muscles, tats, stubble, etc. — it’s a really good combo. That’s really the type of guy women fall for hard — balanced.
So every time someone brings up your baby face, agree and amplify with the subtext of ‘don’t let my appearance fool you….’
LikeLike
“It’s the perfect compliment to your prominent jaw.”
LikeLike
Butthurt.
LikeLike
No. Too harsh. This is a pure insult, not a neg.
LikeLike
“Better to be thought an alpha male than to speak loquaciously and remove all doubt.”
Some commenters here might take note.
LikeLike
Touche’… well struck, sir.
LikeLike
lol the way you wrote that destroys the entire meaning — what’s wrong with removing all doubt about being an alpha male?
Here, bro…’better to be thought a BETA male….’
There you go.
LikeLike
‘It takes a lot of cucumber melon honey paste.’
LikeLike
A: My best complexion causes an unusually tender intimacy of D-E-E-P emotion, or so I’ve been told
LikeLike
Al Capone had the most babyish face I’ve ever seen, and I’m sure he was fending off “shit-tests” all the time.
LikeLike
The best way for you to reframe when a taller guy butts in to cockblock you with a taller chick is for you to leave the frame and hit on a shorter chick.
LikeLike
Yeah, I agree, if she doesn’t react by shoving the other guy away you might as well move onto another woman.
You don’t want to get into bar fight situations for a chick (unless you reckon you can win the fight) I had a delightful girl 6ft strawberry blonde, not so bright, but she got too much attention from cavemen at bars. It’s not worth the potential broken nose. Perhaps you should avoid local bars full of actual criminal class a-holes.
That’s my sense of your post. If you are getting jumped by a civilized man who is just a bit taller (but not savage) you can always tell him to fuck off or you’ll hurt him.
LikeLike
If a tall guy tries to butt in say something like: “Whoaaaa there shorty….”
When he says something like “You’re the short one….”
Say: “Ok, keep thinking that…”
In other words completely reframe this to make height irrelevant.
As for “Baby face” say “Yes and I’m fine with older women…”
That should reframe the shit-test.
LikeLike
Just A and A her re. the babyface shittest. Tell her something like “yeah, you better take me home or i might get ‘failure to thrive’ syndrome”. Then you can tell her what that is..win/win.
Failure to thrive refers to babies whose current weight or rate of weight gain is much lower than that of other children of similar age and gender.
Causes
Failure to thrive may be caused by medical problems or factors in the child’s environment, such as abuse or neglect.
What happened to the Latvian lesbo chick btw?
LikeLike
Nothing happened there. Learning experience nonetheless.
LikeLike
“I’m fine with ..” is sort of blah. How about “I have the fountain of youth!”
Passes shit test, escalates sexually.
LikeLike
“I’m fine with older women” is the ultimate neg when a girl is shit testing you about your looks.
LikeLike
Used this the other night. Totally forgot about it.
I said, “now don’t let anyone in on this secret… But my kitchen tap is actually the fountain of youth.”
LikeLike
No man, your tap between your legs is the fountain of youth. You say “And I I have the fountain of youth” and glance downward for a moment. Make her want that thing.
I know it’s confused, you don’t drink your own cum, but women are looking for the fountain of youth. The idea is, you have so much youth you can even give some to her via that method.
I’ve never used this, but they never said I had a baby face.
LikeLike
No, these are both bad because you guys aren’t addressing the sub-communication. She doesn’t care how good you feel about your baby face. She also doesn’t care about you feeling ‘comfortable in your skin.’ Her saying anything about a babyface or being cute may as well be her saying ‘ya, you’re not bad to look at, but could you fuck me like a dirty slut? I’m not sure….can you make me really feel like a woman? I dunno….’
Smiling big and saying some shit about a fountain of youth, how fine you are with it, or some butthurt thing isn’t going to hit on that sub-communication.
The correct response to the shit test is to demonstrate your cad bonafides. Just trust, pls.
LikeLike
Well I’m short too and I am more comfortable with a woman I can physically dominate, including height wise. In other words, women who look “cute” to me, smaller than me. I am married to such a woman.
Models are wonderful, but not for this lifetime for me. They are much taller than me.
LikeLike
You could always accuse her of negging you (because it is a neg). Or:
“Thank-you, that’s what I’m going for” (Agree an amplify yada yada…)
Have you tried working out? A lot of people don’t seem to realise that working out makes your face grow more masculine. All that extra testosterone doesn’t just grow muscle (your sex drive and sperm count go up to).
LikeLike
Oftentimes when I talk to girls, they’ll point out my baby face…
Possible replies?
“There’s not another one can take my place.”
(((that sonic boom y’all just heard is this homage flying over y’all haids)))
LikeLike
“Oftentimes when I talk to girls, they’ll point out my baby face; it’s an obvious shit test.”
They wouldn’t test you if they weren’t attracted. 8:15 in this vid:
I’d use some variation of that bit, where you tell her it makes girls let their guard down and think you’re innocent so you can bang them easier.
“What’s a good way to reframe and move the interaction back into my favor?”
LikeLike
Thanks YaReally and everyone else.
LikeLike
> “my baby face”
Be patient.
Your day will come.
When all your old college acquaintances are 50 going on 65 and can no longer score with a fertile young woman to save their lives, whereas you’re 50 going on 35, and every fertile young woman within a 25-mile-radius is longing for your seed in her birth canal, the little humiliations which you suffered in college will be a long-forgotten memory.
Payback is a bitch for the dudes who peaked in high school and college.
LikeLike
That’s basically what I’ve figured. I’m not a puffy faced Gerber baby (or a mulatto). Maybe boyish is a better way if putting it. Nice cheek bones, and bone structure, just boyish.
Both my grandfathers look pretty great for their ages though. One of them was regularly the dad all my moms friends had a crush on growing up haha
Just don’t want to use future prospects as an excuse to get lazy in the here and now.
LikeLike
I don’t understand this blog’s obsession with Putin. I get that he has an enviable low-energy alpha demeanor, but his policies are horrible and his country is a shit-hole next to ours. I’ll take a beta leader and [relative] freedom and prosperity over Putin any day.
LikeLike
“but his policies are horrible and his country is a shit-hole next to ours.”
Fool. What policy of his is horrible? Furthermore, has it ever ocurred to you that he hasn’t been president from 1953 till 2000?
LikeLike
From Twitter:
“Tucker was shocked, and couldn’t believe this. But after extensive research, he found that indeed it was true: There was nothing out there that explained sex and dating to young men in an honest, informative, and actionable way.”
“The above quote is BS. Tucker “missed” the manosphere and is trying to make some moolah.”
The quote is true, but it isn’t some insight he just now had. He wrote a couple of posts about game (and his amazement at the fact that 99% of young men today don’t have any) back in the early 2000s. He also posted a positive review on his discussion board (which is sadly long gone) of Neil Strauss’ book when it came out. One thing Strauss noticed, and that Tucker called attention to, is that chumps are willing to throw endless amounts of money at this problem, and that makes the PUA business attractive to hucksters.
LikeLike
Agree, to pretend there’s no information online and by going mainstream you will be the poster-child for the manosphere is rich.
The interesting thing about the “manosphere” is that guys on it know who’s legit, who’s paid their dues and whose advice to follow and whose to discard.
To have some self-appointed “bad boy” poke his head into Oprah-land only exposes himself to more ridicule.
Isn’t there something out there that says ‘the first rule of the Game is that there is no Game”?
By pushing it mainstream it opens it up to the very feminist scrutiny and discrediting that we in the know have come to mock.
LikeLike
It is a blatant lie to say that there is “nothing out there that explained sex and dating to young men”.
And why use the word “actionable” when normal English would work? I am always suspicious of those who sound like this.
Now look at him in Twitter, using a strawman argument. When one guy says that “whatever you write we’ll just link to Chateau Heartiste and show that it’s been said already,” Max Tucker writes that “you’re right dude. Everything there is to know is on heartise. We can all stop learning now.” Strawman argument. No one said “everything” is on Heartiste. (And learn the goddamn spelling.”
But what really pisses me off is when the bastard writes “Manosphere is mostly dressed up residue of pua.” Ridiculous. Anyone who has taken a look at the manosphere knows there is an enormous amount of information that never existed in the PUA writings of the past. Both insights about game and discussions about men’s issues today as a whole. Max Tucker knows this too. He is lying. He knows the manosphere won’t be fooled, but he is hoping to fool others who read what he writes.
Max Tucker’s tactic now will be to present himself as the relaxed and “normal” guy who comes up new things, while the manosphere falsely claims that he has stolen it from them and are simply unwashed masses who shouldn’t be listened to.
And he will be helped in this by some journalists who know exactly what he is doing, I am sure. Some people will listen to him because it is the first time they hear about the material. Others will know the manosphere was first, but will keep quiet because “Max Tucker has a chance of breaking through to the mainstream”. This is how movements are hijacked. It has happened many, many times.
LikeLike
Every business venture Tucker Max has set out to do has failed miserably. This will be no different.
LikeLike
Yup – like his movie that cost $10m+ and grossed about $1m. That POS isn’t even worth torrenting.
The clown is trying to reinvent himself as an angel investor now. No doubt he is using his old man’s money.
Personally I can’t wait until he starts to go after the “manosphere” blogs because they’re going to destroy him.
LikeLike
Good analysis. Entryism kills good movements.
Watch Tucker fail shit tests and lose frame here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHP3_0gBaEI
Those cougars smile and taunt, Tucker points and sputters, exasperated. This is why they’ll be happy to let him into the Overton Window. If Tucker Max is your opposition, your narrative is safe.
LikeLike
That video is awesome lol the entire comment section on it is all agreeing with him. He could’ve kept his cool but tree was so much retardedness being thrown at him that it would be hard not to roll your eyes at those two.
In their view: girls want commitment, guys don’t want to give them commitment, so that’s a problem. But if guys want sex and girls don’t want to give them sex, that’s okay. If a girl wants commitment from a guy she has to either bring more to the table to convince him she’s worth committing to or just not get anything, and that’s a problem…but if a guy wants sex he has to either bring more to the table to convince her he’s worth giving sex to or just not get anything and that’s okay.
They’re literally mad because the tables have flipped and now girls have to work to get what they want lol they would give zero fucks about how unfair it is for men who want casual sex but can’t get it, if things flippe back. And they have no idea that they’re biased this way lol
Anyway this interview goes back to what I said on Rollo’s comments back when that Manosphere dude went on TV without showing his face: you will never ever ever convince the MSM directly to see your point, Tucker would NEVER convince these two silly women to change their ridiculous views and understand logic because they don’t WANT to understand anything…BUT, where the victories are won is in the audience where men (and women) are watching and going “huh you know this guy kind of makes sense….” and typing his name into Google.
You will never convince Oprah, you will never convince Oprah’s studio audience, you probably won’t even convince the fat Bon-Bon eating wives at home watching Oprah…but you might convince that wife’s husband passing by the couch, who hasn’t had sex in a year and who knows something is wrong with the life following society’s rules got him. THAT guy is going to Google “manosphere” and start learning. That’s the mindset anyone going public should be going in with, and anyone watching interviews should be looking at (ie – not “did he convince those retarded women?” but instead “were valid points made that would strike a cord with a dissatisfied man watching?”)
LikeLike
This clip was done in 2011…so I think the “manosphere” and all its great content and studies hadn’t been released.
If he was speaking for the “manosphere”, he would have reframed that comment about the “hookup culture” and say something like “hey, women dig dominant men…this was a huge thrill for her…Also, being “punished” for public sex is a huge turn on for women…chicks dig bad boys”.
Here he’s rolling his eyes, shrugging, gasping.
He’s talking about “hooking up” instead of looking at the concept of male/female attraction etc.
LikeLike
What the fuck are you talking about? He absolutely dismantled them. The ENTIRE comment section in youtube agreed with Tucker.
LikeLike
Really, dismantled?
Being right doesn’t matter when you have pisspoor delivery and let cougars affect your emotional state. He looked embarrassing. No amused mastery. No frame.
Tucker fanboys will agree with anything he says on comment sections everywhere, but its a nonstarter. If the Cathedral is willing to debate with you, you are not darkly enlightened.
LikeLike
“He looked embarrassing. No amused mastery. No frame.”
You come off like a huge dork bro.
His frame was rock solid. He didn’t even bother attacking their points and expressed that it is preposterous to even think they could be right. He fucking outgrouped them like a boss.
“Being right doesn’t matter when you have pisspoor delivery and let cougars affect your emotional state.”
Incredulity and contempt aren’t emotions that harm you.
“He looked embarrassing. No amused mastery.”
Oh shut it. This isn’t “recite PUA lingo” day.
LikeLike
You’re thinking on beginner level.
They brought him on to get exactly that reaction. He played right into their hands. The Overton Window is preserved, the well-dressed women look reasonable and calm and tease him, while the sex blogger looks frustrated and unable to handle “strong women” without getting upset.
But people will defend their alpha dog no matter what, so go ahead, “bro”.
LikeLike
“But what really pisses me off is when the bastard writes “Manosphere is mostly dressed up residue of pua.” Ridiculous.”
I agree with him. The Manosphere is basically PUA repackaged and delivered in a more digestible form to guys who want explanations and to learn about the fix but don’t want to actually put in the dedication PUA takes…that’s why there’s so much mental masturbation and gay race/politics/etc fighting in the Manosphere from guys who go out approaching once a week (if that) and bang 6s. This is like the nice safe version of PUA but all the concepts come FROM PUA.
Put it this way: everyone in the Manosphere knows about PUA and the major PUA companies/resources. Most PUAs have no idea CH/Rollo/Roosh even exist (no offense to them). Part of why I post here is because I see bits and pieces of PUA sprinkled to guys and I can expand on those bits and pieces in my replies because I learned from the original sources (aka PUA and the field).
“Anyone who has taken a look at the manosphere knows there is an enormous amount of information that never existed in the PUA writings of the past. Both insights about game and discussions about men’s issues today as a whole.”
“Hypergamy” is the main thing the Manosphere has made popular that PUAs have never heard of, buuuut we’ve only never heard of that specific word. We still understood and taught that women want the higher value man, so the concept is still from PUA, just repackaged.
The Manosphere definitely covers a wider array of topics, like men’s issues in general, and marriages and shit and I like that stuff but when it comes to actual pickup, Tucker is right that the Manosphere is just dressed up residue of PUA. That’s not a bad thing tho, whatever gets the information out to as many men in whatever forms necessary, I’m all for it. Plus Manosphere writers tend to be better at writing in general so CH/Rollo’s stuff is a delight to read compared to, say, early RSDTyler’s “TRUST ME GUYS THIS IS THE SHIT RIGHT HERE!!” writing lol
LikeLike
YaReally, this is off topic but you said before that once you’re in an LTR it’s difficult or impossible to segue into an open relationship, because (paraphrasing) “she’ll feel like something has gone wrong with her, that she’s no longer good enough”.
What’s a man to do? I will never be in an open LTR where she has carte blanch to sleep around, If others can do that, cool, more power to them. I just can’t. I’ve been wracking my brain about this for months. How do you set up an open arrangement where you can sleep around, but she must be loyal sexually? I feel like a slimebag tapping ass on the side and lying to her, but it’s not in my nature to be monogamous even if I love the girl (I do love my gf).
Does your main gf remain monogamous to you? If she didn’t, would that be a dealbreaker? If you’ve written about this before I’d appreciate a link to it, I’ll trawl over every word.
LikeLike
> “How do you set up an open arrangement where you can sleep around, but she must be loyal sexually?”
Son, that’s called “polygamy”.
See whether you can sell her on the idea.
It would help if you already had five or six kids by her, and you could tell her that you needed to start bringing some younger sister wives into the family to help with the babymaking.
LikeLike
Polygamy without marriage likely mutates into polyandry out of spite though, no? I don’t want to hurt or embarrass her. I just want to go out to a club and tap a few random sluts once or twice a month.
Please don’t tell me to put a bun in her oven, ain’t gonna happen right now (but it will one day with a different chick)
LikeLike
@Lurking Gorilla
I cover a lot of this in these posts:
http://yareallyarchive.com/search/?q=how+open+relationships+frame
But cover your concern specifically (her fucking other dudes) in this one:
http://yareallyarchive.com/2012/6/#comment-heartiste-347499
“I will never be in an open LTR where she has carte blanch to sleep around, If others can do that, cool, more power to them. I just can’t.”
The trick is to understand that Hypergamy changes the way the deal plays out. Women want to fuck the highest value man they can fuck. They don’t generally care about racking up notches on their belt the way men do. They want the best, the top dog. So as long as, to her, you’re the best man around, she’ll turn down other cock for yours.
So an “open relationship” is really just a very strategic gamble, understanding how women’s Hypergamy works, that ends up being an “I fuck a bunch of other women and you just fuck me” arrangement because of human nature.
The catch on your end is that you have to continue to be better than other men, but 1) that’s not that hard to do, other men are lame and if you have game and understand the Red Pill and what’s ACTUALLY attractive to women, it’s really not a concern, and 2) that’s something you should be doing anyway for yourself as a man who respects himself.
ie – if you tell a girl “k, open relationship” and then you still hit the gym, still go out with friends, still eat healthy, still dress stylish, still groom well, still have goals in life, still strive to get places in your career, still take up new hobbies/interests, still challenge yourself and set personal goals, still flirt with waitresses in front of her, etc. your girl will never bother going for other cock even though you’ve given her permission to and you’re banging other girls on the side…hell if anything, you banging other girls just makes you more attractive to her because it helps a shitload of your sub-communications be attractive.
But if you tell a girl “k, open relationship” and then you lay on a couch all day, complain about how much you hate your job, drink beer and eat fried chicken while you watch sports and get fat and slothy, stop taking care of your body and style and grooming, escape into mindless reality TV every night, quit putting effort into sex (your shitty diet/exercise will probably fuck that up for you anyway), stop hanging out with your friends, stop flirting with waitresses in front of her (or worse, flirt BADLY with them, because now you’re a gross piece of shit who hasn’t been around other women in a month and you’re trying to flirt when you haven’t flirted in ages), etc. etc, then ya, she’s going to go out and suck a bunch of dick.
You CAN expressly state “I get to fuck around and you don’t”, VS running the oLTR gambit above, but 1) she will test the fuck out of you on it, 2) it’s a lower percentage play, and 3) you’ll have to screen a lot more for a woman that’ll go for it because now you’re consciously making demands VS just letting nature play out organically (ie – in the gambit you’re letting HER decide to only fuck you, VS demanding she only fuck you which she’s more likely to resist or act out against).
“How do you set up an open arrangement where you can sleep around, but she must be loyal sexually?”
Well, YOU can’t, with your current mindset. Because the very fact that you’re worried about her banging other men says 1) you don’t understand Hypergamy, and 2) it’s conceivable in your mind in ANY capacity that another man could actually be more attractive to you and you would have to worry about her wanting to fuck another man besides you…like, jealousy by definition is being worried about her fucking another man, but if she’s only going to fuck the highest value man then you are inherently exuding the vibe that “there are other men out there who are higher value than me” which makes you, by definition, lower value than other men in your own mind, which makes you, by extrapolation, lower value than other men in HER mind, and then she goes and fucks her boss at work.
Understand? Like, this is a situation where you want to be delusional. It’s an INSANE notion to me that another man could be more attractive to my Primary GF than me. It’s laughable, it wouldn’t even enter my head. George Clooney could walk in the room and I would still act like I’m more attractive to my girl than he could possibly be. It radiates in my sub-communications. I trust that my confidence will keep her Hypergamy focused on me and that she’ll follow her Hypergamous instincts and stay with me.
It’s one of those things where if you try it with 99% belief, it won’t work. It takes 100% belief. Like if you say to a girl you’ve cold-approached “Hey, come with me” and try to pull her by the arm, but you have like 60% belief, she’ll pull away. But if you have 100% belief, she’ll fall into your frame and go along with it.
“I feel like a slimebag tapping ass on the side and lying to her, but it’s not in my nature to be monogamous even if I love the girl (I do love my gf).”
If you’ve been dating in a monogamous (as far as she knows) relationship, you’re stuck, because you have to set the frame from the start. So get used to the lying and sneaking around slimebag lifestyle and use that guilt you feel to fuel you doing things right from the start with your next GF.
“Does your main gf remain monogamous to you?”
I’ve never been cheated on. Guys will say “oh whatever, you can’t know what she’s doing 24/7” but those are generally guys who haven’t been rockstar levels of high-value to their GFs and seen what it’s like when the girl is head over heels for you over a long period of time…those are usually guys who let themselves go and got cheated on because they became low-value to their girl. Or guys will say “well I knew this one rich good-looking badass dude who got cheated on!!” and it’s like no, you knew a rich good-looking badass dude who, for whatever reason (reasons you’ll probably never be privvy to, maybe personal specific reasons to her like she views guys wearing red shirts as low value because of whatever baggage is in her past and he started wearing red shirts too often), became low-value in his girls’ eyes and got cheated on.
The most that’s happened (with fuckbuddies as I’m establishing this dynamic) is that she might test me at the start, like fuck a guy or pretend to have fucked a guy, just to test my frame and see if it shakes me…but in my mind other guys just make me look more awesome because other guys are lamer than me, so even THAT fuels my delusional frame, which she’ll naturally fall into it, and come back to me and not do it again. If I let myself go and let my value drop, she might test me again and see if I shape up or stay low-value and unattractive and then I’d become Captain Cuckold.
The biggest thing guys have to understand is that their value fluctuates constantly. You don’t become a badass top dog and then marry your beautiful 9 wife and then you’re just automatically still that badass top dog forever…if you don’t actively work on yourself and work on staying that badass top dog, you will lose value in her eyes, and she will look around and see or meet other guys who are higher value than you to her, and she’ll start cheating on you with them instead. But that’s your fault because you gave up and let yourself become low-value, or you didn’t learn game and understand what makes high/low value and simply got blindsided which is totally unfair but all the more reason this stuff needs to be taught to as many men as possible.
“If she didn’t, would that be a dealbreaker?”
Not to me, because I don’t care…long as she’s safe about it and doesn’t come over without a bunch of showers and shit lol Realistically though, I offer better sex than like 99% of guys, so if she went out and banged some other guy I know that he would be a shitty lay compared to me and it would be a one or two time thing max before she realizes “ok YaReally is way better than this random bar dude who’s hands shake nervously when he asks if it’s okay to take my bra off”.
But I have buddies who it would be a dealbreaker for. They have ways of handling it (Soft Nexts, Freeze-outs, etc.) but it’s too much drama for me…I’d rather set the frame up front and let things play out, VS doing constant damage control.
“If you’ve written about this before I’d appreciate a link to it, I’ll trawl over every word.”
Good luck!
LikeLike
“Realistically though, I offer better sex than like 99% of guys, so if she went out and banged some other guy I know that he would be a shitty lay compared to me”
would you mind expanding on that a little more (or linking the relevant posts in yareally archives)?
I’m reaching a point in my game where I can sleep with really attractive girls (model looking etc.), but past a few bangs, the interest always seems to fade, and I just dont know why
So so frustrating!! I’m thinking that maybe I’m not fucking them well enough, not talking about stamina or weird kamasutra positions and stuff, but I feel like I lack more in the psychological department
I dont really get how to relate emotionally with a girl, to give the “full range of emotions” like Julien talks about. I’m basically a chill and fun guy who’s non-judgemental or jealous, but I feel like sometimes this is too “plain”, like the girls get bored of that
also, thanks a lot for all your comments man
know that although there are lots of keyboard jockeys in here, some people like me are inspired by your posts to go out, take massive actions, learn from the mistakes etc.
my game has improved so much since I discovered CH and your comments, it’s kinda thanks to you that I’m consistently putting myself out of my comfort zone and pulling these increasingly hotter girls!
LikeLike
@Klem
“I’m reaching a point in my game where I can sleep with really attractive girls (model looking etc.), but past a few bangs, the interest always seems to fade, and I just dont know why
So so frustrating!! I’m thinking that maybe I’m not fucking them well enough, not talking about stamina or weird kamasutra positions and stuff, but I feel like I lack more in the psychological department
I dont really get how to relate emotionally with a girl, to give the “full range of emotions” like Julien talks about. I’m basically a chill and fun guy who’s non-judgemental or jealous, but I feel like sometimes this is too “plain”, like the girls get bored of that”
All good, man. A lot of guys go through this. A lot of it comes from social conditioning: we expect girls to be precious Disney princess flowers, especially the ones we LIKE, so it’s a mind-fuck to think about taking that same cute girl you’re flirting with and calling her a dirty little slut etc. Last weekend I literally had a former FB txting me while she was drinking “wish you were here to slap me…” She’s dating some big roided up ex-military dude but he’s lame in bed and she knows I’d fuck her the way most guys won’t, because she’s the dolled-up type so most guys see a girl like that and are like “oh I don’t want to mess this perfect product up, she spent so long on her hair, I’m not going to drag her around by it and ruin it!!” etc.
That’s a big part of it too, is how hot she is. A lot of guys will treat a 6 like a slut in bed because they instinctively hate the 6 a bit for being average/ugly but being all they have access to, so they can vent in a kind of hate-fuck which she loves…but no one will treat an 8+ that way. They’ll do gay romantic sex…meanwhile that girl might have fantasies of starring in the next meatholes video lol
Not all girls want rough sex of course…the trick is to learn to calibrate and dig around her fantasies and figure out what turns her on, and then bring those fantasies to life for her. Like 99% of a girl’s orgasm is mental, so when you have her mentally engaged and turned on that’s way better to her than just jack-hammering away at her pussy lol
Here’s a big chunk of cut ‘n paste from my archives that should help you get on the right track:
—
lol this was similar to my attitude when I was a shy awkward nerdy hermit living in my computer room. I read/watched as much about sex as I could so that if I DID finally get a girlfriend someday, I would be amazing in bed.
I’m lazy and not in great shape, so I’m big on finding ways to get a girl off that don’t involve basically doing a thousand sit-ups as fast as possible. I recommend:
Squirting 101 – you can find clips from it around the net, but I recommend torrent’ing the full video. This shit blows girls’ mind…I make pretty much every girl I’m with squirt, and if she doesn’t full-out gushing squirt (some girls squirt more than others, I was hooking up with a chick who could give Cytheria a run for her money lol I stopped seeing her ’cause having to let the bed dry out for a day and a half was too inconvenient), they at LEAST have an epic orgasm thru manipulating the g-spot while going down on them etc. I recommend this vid ’cause this guy’s description and demonstration of the technique is solid and you can see how other guys don’t get what he’s doing and can’t pull it off.
Sex God Method – Give this a read. A woman’s orgasm is primarily mental. Understanding that it’s not about how big your dick is or how deep you can thrust or how long you can pound away is key…if you understand how to turn her on mentally, tease her, build things up etc., you can get her to a state where she’s literally orgasming as soon as your dick slides in her. Ya, there are girls who just love a good hard pounding and it’s good to do that now and then if you can, but even then everything is enhanced a shit-load when you understand how to turn her mind on.
The sad/funny part of it is that even just watching/learning from those two sources, you’ll be light-years ahead of 90% of guys. My player buddies and I always quiz girls on other guy’s techniques and shit and it’s the same story over and over…the dude just rails away at her as fast/hard as he can go trying to show off, and half the time she doesn’t even get off. Girls don’t come back to me for my charming personality lol…they come back to me because I know how to fuck them proper.
The key is in quality over quantity. Like I could just bend her over and try to thrust away for 30 min, and ya, the thrusting feels good to her because there are nerves down there, but it’s nothing special and might not even get her off.
But if instead of that, I bend her over with a little more force, grab a fist-ful of her hair with one hand pulling her head back, wrap my other arm around her throat so it’s in the crook(?) of my elbow and growl into her ear making her feel like she’s helplessly being fucked by some kind of animal, and I do that after an hour of building up the sexual tension and teasing her with fingers/oral getting her close to the edge and backing off before she orgasms etc., and as I finish I talk dirty into her ear, cover her mouth with my hand, etc., I can just fuck for a couple minutes and it’ll send her over the edge because I’m creating an entire experience for her…and I don’t have to do nearly as much work as the 30 min of thrusting lol
Even with oral/fingers, you don’t have to ram away at that shit. Do a bunch of teasing and not-quite-touching, breathing on it, super slow light licks etc. The anticipation/build-up is more exciting than blasting away. Ideally I like to tease them at the edge until they get to the point where any light touch I do feels super intense. Sometimes I’ll just do the absolute lightest touches through their orgasm and it drives them nuts.
“I’m thinking of hiring a classy escort to teach me every damn thing.”
I’ve never fucked one, but honestly I can’t see them teaching you much. They probably fuck a LOT of shitty lays (if those guys were good lays, they wouldn’t need a hooker), and I’ve found that most girls don’t even realize they can squirt or understand wtf I’m doing down there that’s blowing their mind. Like the hotness and/or amount of sex a woman has had doesn’t seem to have any real correlation to how well they know their bodies or how much they know about sex.
You’ll gain a lot more knowledge from checking out Squirting101 and Sex God Method. What I would do if I was you is check those out, and then call up any of your current/past hookups that you can call up, even if they’re not hot, and try the techniques out on them…especially the squirting stuff. As soon as you pull your fingers in the right place the girl can tell you’re doing something different so that one’s pretty quick to tell “hey, she’s really responding to this”…get the timing right (do it when she’s turned on and closer to orgasm VS right at the start) and you’re likely in for a show lol
LikeLike
Excellent YaReally, I’ve just thrown those texts onto the ol kindle and will read them when I catch a train a bit later tonight, cheers (sincerely looking forward to it, hah)
LikeLike
http://mattforney.com/2013/09/16/the-case-against-female-self-esteem/
LikeLike
I wonder if a transcription of the Obama/Putin conversation would pass the Jumbotron test in Zero’s favor.
That was a rhetorical question by the way.
LikeLike
At any rate, Putin would join the ranks of Skittles Man, Bring the Movies Man, and Nah Man.
LikeLike
shoot you in the face for mother russia man….
LikeLike
Don’t forget Ice Cream Guy.
LikeLike
Let us compare Putin and Obama. Putin has spent his life in the KGB kicking ass and taking names. Soetoro/Obama or whatever his name is has spent his life studying social justice and how to be a better victim. Putin is an actual leader with real power in his nation. Obama is a symbol of YKW degeneracy and controlled by YKW puppeteers. Putin’s largest concern is returning his country to its former greatness. Obama’s largest concern is to destroy his country through the Frankfurt School’s cultural marxism. I’d rather live in Russia.
LikeLike
http://f2bbs.com/bbs/show_topic/932701/1
“What would you do if, overnight, advanced stealth fighters bombed all US military facilities and Vladimir Putin announced the US was now under his control.
All US military hardware is crippled in a daring night-time raid using advanced long-range stealth bomber drones built using technology the US was unaware of and has no ability to track. This includes taking out all nuclear sites.
President Obama, aware that he has no means of counter-attack, appears of television and announces the unconditional surrender of the United States to Russia.
What would you do?”
The responses are mostly shades of “welcome Putin with open arms”:
“I’m a straight, white male. Why should I show any loyalty to this country when it’s been made painfully obvious that my country views me as the enemy? I’m NOT a patriot. I’m NOT willing to die for a bunch of people who blame me for all the ills of the world. You libfags honestly believe that you can keep shitting in the faces of white guys and still have them be “patriotic” and support you? Go fuck yourself. Give me Putin.”
LikeLike
America is Big Fag. Fighting World War Gay.
Even American soldiers know this deep down.
The things that motivated Guderian and Manstein’s amazing performance in Barbarossa were not enough to knock off Russian nationalism.
Do you nutty Neo-cons really think farm boys from Ohio will risk a bullet for a black CinC and his tranny wife?
LikeLike
Yeah, the left had better be pretty worried when the guardians of America–the dudes on the front lines–the straight white gentiles–aren’t willing to die for the place anymore. Shades of Rome’s fall, etc.
Nah, the left never thinks that far ahead.
LikeLike
What’s in it for the white boy in today’s America?
Fuck all.
LikeLike
Exactly.
LikeLike
My barber is a well meaning, patriotic, old-fashioned type. Has flags from each service hanging on the wall, encourages patrons to sign under which branch they served in, years, units, etc. He always pushes me to add my name.
In the shop on Saturday with my eldest. I recognize a Coastie in there, kid in chair next to me is a new Navy ensign, an old retired neighbor who hangs around (retired admiral) is across from us reading the paper and drinking coffee.
Barber asks my son if he will follow me in the military. “FUCK NO!” I blurted it out loud, without even thinking. I was even a bit shocked by the visceral response. My son was confused, as I try very hard not to swear around him, let alone in public.
I got several dirty looks, and there was an uncomfortable silence for 4-5 minutes until the next guy walked in and small talk resumed about fishing, St. Patrick’s Day, etc.
LikeLike
Awesome, good for you. Protect your son from those who would exploit him. The problem is that fine young fellas think they’re doing the right thing so their own good virtues are working against them. Awareness of the exploitation of military men can save a lot of them
LikeLike
Nah, the left never thinks that far ahead.
Libfags only emote.
The thing is, even dogs have emotions: think about the time you caught your dog pooping where he wasn’t supposed to, or when you were taking him to the vet.
If human beings only use their emotions, they’re actually worse than animals, because animals don’t have intellects and reasoning capabilities. Libfags do have them, but choose not to use them.
LikeLike
The feminists in Europe that mind Islam(because it’s not egalitarian enough) have the same problem because it’s probably preferable for European men to convert to Islam than to fight for what feminists believe in.
LikeLike
I’d fight even harder because when I win that means IT’S MINE and I would simply get rid of the old government.
America will never bow to a foreign ruler.
LikeLike
It would also be instructive to compare Lavrov and Kerry.
LikeLike
Good idea. Kerry is a man so vain and narcissistic that he shoots his face so full of botox to the point where he doesn’t even look human anymore. Lavrov does not use botox or any other cosmetic procedure as an attempt to enhance his appearance.
Lavrov>Kerry
LikeLike
Kerry …
LikeLike
I’m certainly prepared to give the Russian the benefit of the doubt. I do not like having a token overlord. They might as well stick a Jew in the whitehouse and make it explicit. I’m sick of the black guy. I know he was elected because he wasn’t a war monger, but his ability to alienate robustly nationalistic white nations is beginning to annoy me.
Not that lunatics like McCain could have been expected to make better decisions.
LikeLike
We ended up 0bama because the GOP Establishment nominated McCain in 2008 — who would have had us in a nuclear war — and Romney in 2012 — who invented 0bamacare.
The GOP Establishment is under libfag control just as much as the Dims.
LikeLike
Speaking of comparions between countries, If some of you know the complete list of Monocle soft power survey 2013 top 30, please let me know right now, i only have this data: 1- Germany 2- United Kingdom 3- United States 4- France 5- Japan 6- Sweden 7- Australia 8- Switzerland 9- Canada 10- Italy 12- Spain 14- Korea 17- Singapore 19- Brazil 20- China 24- Mexico 26- Turkey 27- Russia 30- Poland plus i know Chile is somewhere, so i miss 10 places!
LikeLike
>>> I’d rather live in Russia.
not difficult to actually do…. for actual makhers.
don’t let the door slam your ass on the way out.
LikeLike
Back to the West Bank, and take your Tikkun Olam with you hosenose.
LikeLike
And with a name like that, I hope the door slams you on the way out as you go to live in Israel. No doubt you’d cry that the door was anti-Semitic.
LikeLike
The women are hotter in Russia, even if the weather is colder.
LikeLike
I have noticed this too. It is quite funny looking at how feminists describe their husbands compared to their former lovers. If you lurk through some comment sections of feminist sites and articles then you will see some blatant “alpha fux, beta bux” going on.
The other day I was reading through some salon article and the comments, it might have been the femcunt advising women to sleep around that CH linked to, and in the comments there were a few manosphere types. Several feminists, including a couple of older boomer feminists, spoke up about their “right” to have sex.
I remember one of them came out and said, in a matter of fact way, that it was a former partner of hers from her 20s who gave her the best sex of her life. She spent several sentences talking about how he gave her earth shattering orgasms and what not. Then she compared him to her husband and went on about how he was wrong for her in every way and when she got older she wanted “security” and “love” over orgasms….lolz.
I really hope her husband reads that. If I were to find that on a gfs computer or overhear it in a conversation then we would be done and I would hope most men would do the same. Unfortunately, the type of man who would marry a used up feminist slag probably has some sort of cuckold fetish or something.
Another area that you see this type of rationalization in is with feminist mothers and their sons. It either goes one of two ways. She talks about how she raised him as a feminist and now he is a “nice, good, hardworking man who respects his…probably former slut…wife.” Or, what I have found more often, the hamster goes nuclear and she spins rationalization after rationalization about her adult or soon to be adult son and how masculine he is. I especially find the latter interesting, and sad, and quite amusing.
I remember first encountering this about 2 years ago or so. It was on some small feminist blog that I found. She was talking, in her post and the comments, about how we need to raise our sons to be against patriarchy and respect women and blah blah blah.
I started trolling her and she responded in the typical way. Then she went out of her way to point out that one of her sons is not only feminist and respects women and blah blah blah, but is also captain of the football team and her older son is a marine who drives motorcycles and [insert masculine activities] and how that is ok and even more she went out of her way to point out how her youngest son, who I think was in middle school, is very feminine and so on. He main point, as she said, was that we should all be “free to be me”.
She permabanned me when I pointed out how she described her more masculine sons in a good light and winced around the subject of her more feminine son. I then pointed out how “interesting” it was that she pushed so much feminist bullshit down her sons throats that they went in the most masculine and “traditional” way they could. She really didn’t like the fact that I kept pointing out how I did the same thing because I got fucking sick of tired of my feminist mom, a regional director of NOW, pushing this bullshit on me but how it messed up my younger brother by turning him into the most beta of betas.
I really don’t understand the desire of so many women to neuter their sons. Do you guys have any interesting info on it? Fathers tend to want to protect their
daughters and turn their sons into better men than themselves (I know there are always exceptions but this is what I see in the traditional-ist families around me in the south). Mothers on the other hand seem to have this strange sexual competition with their daughters and they have a instinctive desire to beta-ize their sons. Why is it? I would think that this is more biological/evolutionarily derived that cultural simply because so many cultures have words for “momma’s boys”. I know that in more traditional cultures a mother would rely on her son’s for protection and provision in their old age, but this still doesn’t seem to adequately explain the strange sexualization that lurks behind the arguments and comments put forward by women, especially boomer feminist women, about their sons and masculinity.
What are your guys thought?
LikeLike
Simple: Feminism is pure evil, and the opposite of what is logical and truthful.
LikeLike
To take Paul Muray’s point even further, I’ve heard many married and LTR/taken women talking as if they are completely solo and not attached at-all.
Female solipsism WTF.
LikeLike
Crimea is Russian territory.
Barry ought to back away from the nationalistic white man.
LikeLike
The problem with NotMyPresident and Russia is that Putin is immune to cries of “racisssss.” Since NotMyPresident’s entire career has been about playing the race card — even as far back as the Harvard Law Review “presidency” (lol)– he and his people have no fall back position. He’s not a strong man, good leader, or even consistent; he has no agenda or intelligence to speak of. He merely shows up, implies racism, has his minions openly say it, and takes home the election.
Calling Putin a “racisss” will not work because : (1) Russians are not p.c.-indoctrinated, and therefore it stings very little –many hate ni99ers fiercely and openly; (2) Russia is invading other white people, so the racism charge as defined by the modern left suddenly can’t apply; and (3) Putin is savvy enough to turn any attempt on its head and go full throttle for the social left’s throat on it — Putin’s work influencing the manosphere with comparisons of his masculinity with NotMyPresident’s girlishness being a good example. Putin would love a shot to turn NotMyPresident’s people openly against him, and exploiting the deep-seeded resentment white men in this country have for the Left that has slowly put them into the social underclass.
What was toxic to Romney/any other U.S. politician is laughable to Putin. Therefore, since NotMyPresident’s only weapon is neutralized (and even turned against him), NotMyPresident cannot win against Putin.
Geopolitical rape!
LikeLike
He’s bringing Russians and Russian territory back into the fold. Crimea is Russian.
No one in Europe or America should be tricked into taking a bullet to make Crimea “Ukrainian”.
LikeLike
Dude, ever hear of the Anchluss?
Anyway, even if this is legit, when nations take over land on the basis of ethnic identity (e.g. “Greater Germany”) its always a sign of a strong man finding an excuse.
Putin’s a strong man…a conqueror. This is the first taste. I hate the man, yet respect him immensely for acting like a man. I hate NotMyPresident, and don’t even respect him.
LikeLike
We weren’t willing to take a bullet then either.
LikeLike
Why yes, I have heard of it, and it is “anschluss”. Austria was German land, and it was beset by communist rioters, attacking the Right’s political meetings, fomenting riots, attacking shopkeepers, looting stores, and killing. Just like in Germany. After Churchill and the other fllth had starved Germany by keeping the blockade of German ports for five months after the war they started against the Germans (“If the blockade is lifted the war will have been for nothing!” – Churchill), causing the deaths of tens of thousands of people, especially malnourished children, the Germans realized they needed to be united. That meant bringing Austria home. You might want to look up where the name Austria comes from.
It also meant bringing home the Sudeten Germans, in lands given to Czechoslovakia after the attack on Germany. There were more Germans than Slovaks in that state, but they were treated as third-class citizens basically living in an open-air prison. It also meant rescuing the Germans living in captured provinces under the Polish dictator, who treated them like crap, driving many from their homes, trying to form a pact three times with France to invade Germany, and after secret promises from Britain doing anything to refuse to negotiate with Germany about guarantees for the Germans’ well-being. The Germans knew these old German provinces should be brought back home, especially in preparation for Stalin’s coming attack against Western Europe, which was only a matter of time. And they were exactly right: after attacking pro-German Finland and the Baltic states, and invading Germany’s ally Persia together with Britain in 1941, and forcing Germany’s ally Romania to cede territory under threat of invasion, Stalin moved his forces to the western border, but Germany struck faster and destroyed most of the Soviet air force and other units, preventing the planned invasion of the West which the communist Roosevelt no doubt would have applauded. The strengthening of Germany before that moment saved the Western half of Europe. Though Roosevelt, refusing to allow the army to move east to the Balkans after invading Italy, made sure that the communist commissars could at least take over the Eastern half and kill millions of Europeans there.
To learn some actual history about what led up to WWII, read this for starters:
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.se/p/timeline-to-war.html
This is information that historians know about, but the media and schools make sure people never learn.
LikeLike
You, sir, are a credit to your race. 😉
LikeLike
“Anchluss” is what every puss fuck , arm chair historian uses from his WWII key word list in a feeble attempt to demonstrate that they are erudite.
I just thought you ought to know that before associating yourself with them.
Vienna and Berlin were not a unified power unless you go back to the neither Roman nor Holy empire. Many of those German speaking populations were under Hapsburg like Sudetenland in Bohemia, aka Austrian in domain.
In the case of Prussia , nary a world about Bismark who copied the nation states of Britain, France and and unified “Germany” via the Franco-Prussian war. A bit later of course when the Prussian shocked the world by the humiliation of France, then of course Britain and France did the same “how dare they unify” back in the 19th century which lead to the impoverished, radicalized and pissed off Germany that resulted, leading to WWII in the first place.
That is to say but one example of peoples with a similar cultural circling the wagons and unifying in a dangerous world is complete bullshit. Sure was popular in other contexts where Garibaldi is hailed as a hero. But then that conveniently weakened Austria.
What should we call the Federalist papers that was nothing but a call for unity against the foreign powers? Amerishluss?
LikeLike
Russians aren’t “white”, at least not culturally. Ukrainians, Poles and Germans know this very well, why are Americans so naive? If you don’t believe me – spend some time in Russia. Actual ethnic Russians (as opposed to Russians of Jewish, Polish or German descent, i.e. the Russian intellectual elite) are culturally identical to American inner city blacks – very gregarious, like to have fun, no work ethic, can’t tell the truth, no ability to plan for the future, serious problems with alcohol and drug abuse, love peacocking and bling, very promiscuous, men don’t stick around to be fathers to their children, resolve dispute through violence, hate being “disrespected”, etc. The irony of Obama vs. Putin, is that Obama is the white man and Putin is the bad ass nigger.
LikeLike
LOL
LikeLike
Actually its the ethnic Russians that kept the Soviet Union running which is why the Ukrainian industry is to the east and Chechnya became an economic disaster once the ethnic Russians left. In other words Ukrainians and central Asians are even worse. But compared to Germans, yes Russians fit the description much more. It certainly did not help having the upper classless annihilated during the revolution. Though modern Britain is now a baby mama ghetto as well, showing how quickly things can deteriorate.
LikeLike
Ukrainians drink less and work harder than Russians. Russians have always exploited this about Ukraine.
LikeLike
I believe that this Russian woman has something to tell you
http://www.jokeroo.com/pictures/funny/992591.html
LikeLike
Pithy and apt.
LikeLike
The problem with NotMyPresident and Russia is that Putin is immune to cries of “racisssss.”
That’s an important point to consider for all white men nowadays… most of us still don’t realize that merely not being afraid to be called names can shut down most of the opposition’s attempt to control us.
Sigh… never before was a heritage so nearly lost so easily regained… if we would merely find a way to (as the Bard said) “screw our courage to the sticking point.”
LikeLike
Its more than that. iN Russia, being called “racisss” will not get you socially ostracized. In the U.S., it will be–by other men. We need social groups powerful enough to both accept racists and be attractive enough for women to want to be part of them/attached to them.
LikeLike
The Russkies are already being called h0m0phobes.
LikeLike
And they aren’t backing down much. Sure, Putin gave the “compromise” at the Sochi Olympics of allowing them in but not allowing them to propagandize, but that was due to his dependence on internationalism to bosst his country’s patriotism. Now that that’s gone, he’ll be back to slapping them around.
Fa9 rape!
LikeLike
People as different as Gorbachev, and Khrushchev’s granddaughter, agree that Crimea belongs with Russia. She says her grandfather just did it to be nice to Ukraine and it wasn’t really a big deal because it was all Soviet Union, but when the SU broke up Yeltsin should have reversed it rather than not bothering to do anything.
LikeLike
True. And notice how the media “forget” that a coup overthrew the democratically elected government in Ukraine. And that’s why the Crimeans want to come back to Russia.
The George Soros Foundation and Washington’s globalist, tax-funded organizations, like USAID, the NED and the IRI, funded and trained the “youth organizations” in the Orange Revolution to overthrow the Ukrainian election result at that time. Just like they funded and trained “youth organizations” to do the same in Serbia, Georgia, Belarus (it failed), Iran (it failed), possibly in Lebanon a few years back though it couldn’t be proved, and I believe it was in either Kazakhstan or Tajikistan. Now they are at it again.
Note: President Yanukovych offered early elections. He released illegal demonstrators from jail. He blanket pardoned all demonstrators. He offered the demonstrators the prime minister seat. A deal was struck in February where President Yanukovych, urged by Putin who talked to the West, promised not to use the army to remove the illegal demonstrators, in exchange for peace and an early election. Then the U.S.-supported coalition broke the agreement and went on the attack. And before that they had already taken over military installations, stolen weapons and killed nine police officers.
The excuse for the demonstrators’ violence was snipers shooting at them. But as Estonia’s foreign minister Urmas Paet says, signs point to the snipers belonging to the demonstrators’ side. Olga Bogomolets, a doctor in the demonstration camp in the Maidan Square, says she could tell the snipers were the same who had been shooting at the police earlier. The bullets came from the same place. She refused a seat as Prime Minister of Ukraine for Humanitarian Affairs because of this deception – the new coalition side’s snipers shooting at demonstrators and then blaming it on President Yanukovych.
Of course, yes, President Yanukovych probably had a lot of corruption going on. Ukraine is immensely corrupt. But so does Tymoshenko on the new coalition’s side, who when she was in office squirreled away millions. That is why she went to jail, but the media now only talk about her prison sentence as “political revenge” by Yanukovych when he took office.
John McCain and the American ambassador urged the demonstrators to continue their attacks on the democratic government. They made sure no deals would be made. Exactly like the globalists urged Kuwait’s emir not to negotiate with Iraq, when Kuwait was drilling for oil in under Iraq’s border, and selling far more oil than its OPEC quota, counting on the other nations to keep the price high by adhering to their quotas. And exactly like Britain gave false guarantees to Poland’s dictator, telling him to keep treating the captured German provinces like trash in order to provoke Germany, pretending that Britain would quickly come and win the war for them. Exactly like Britain, Russia France supported Serbia after the new Serbian military dictatorship had armed and transported the Black Hand terrorists to kill the Austrian archduke, then refused to hand them over to Austria, so that Britain, Russia and France would get their war against Austria and Germany. And just like the CIA funded Georgia’s new army after the coup, making it four times larger, training it together with the Mossad (who of course didn’t have to pay for anything), then sending the Georgians to attack South Ossetia during the Summer Olympics, Russian territory that only nominally belonged to Georgia since the Georgian Stalin gave it to that province by the stroke of a pen. There are other examples too. Always urging some stooge to refuse to negotiate in a conflict, so that the globalists will have an excuse to attack a competitor.
What if Tea Party demonstrators had occupied a town square in Washington? What if they had taken over military facilities, stolen weapons and killed nine police officers? What if they vowed to overthrow the democratically elected president in order to repeal Obamacare? What if the Russian ambassador quickly gave their coup plans his blessing, and Russian senators came to visit in Washington to shake hands with the Tea Party leaders and promise support for the coup? What if Mexicans were brought in and paid to demonstrate, like reportedly Moldavians were brought in and paid to demonstrate in Kiev?
Funny how the White House keeps quiet about the fascist Svoboda party and the Right Sector. But these are dupes. Ukraine is completely broke. Dollars will be pouring in to the other parties, who will win the coming election. Svoboda can’t compete with that. Also, the threat will be that if Svoboda sits in the government after the election, there will be no EU money flowing in. The other parties will form a coalition without Svoboda. Remember this a year from now – it is easy to predict. Of course the globalists won’t allow a nationalist party to sit in the post-election government.
By the way, Crimea has belonged to Russia longer than California has belonged to the United States. Crimeans have far-reaching autonomy. They only nominally belonged to Ukraine during Soviet times. They had their own president in the early 1990s, before Kiev took that position away from them. They wanted to come back to Russia then, but the corrupt Boris Yeltsin refused them that choice, bowing to the Western globalists who sent money to Russia.
Funny how it’s not okay for Crimea to go back to Russia … but it was okay for Albanians, the vast majority of which had immigrated illegally into Kosovo, to take over Kosovo and declare independence. The Serbs didn’t try to throw out any Albanians with Serb citizenship. They only threw out illegal aliens. (Imagine if illegal aliens would try to take over California the same way. Imagine if Protestant churches in California were burned by a drug-dealing communist guerilla, the way Orthodox churches were burned by the communist drug-dealing KLA guerrilla in Kosovo.) But as YKW General Wesley Clark said, “there is no room for ethnically pure states in today’s Europe”. YKW Madeleine Albright and YKW “Sandy” Berger agreed and pushed for war.
Globalists obviously approve of ignoring a country’s democratic laws when it suits them. They will go back and forth between what is acceptable and not. The one red thread is that those who have supported the Palestinians, or those supporting those who have supported the Palestinians (Serbia -> Russia -> Syria -> Hezbollah -> Palestinians) must be removed. While tyrants in e.g. Algeria, Egypt, Bahrain, Yemen and Saudi Arabia are okay if they turn a blind eye to the Palestinian genocide. It always comes back to this: Israel’s plan for Middle Eastern expansion. No Israel ally is ever attacked. The Israeli lobby in Washington always gets its way, with only nominal reluctance by the White House sometimes.
Now, as for Putin. He is no saint. He has harrassed nationalist groups in Russia to a criminal degree. People are picked up by the police when committing no crimes, in order to intimidate them. Publications are banned. There is a long list of attacks on those who don’t want mass immigration to western Russia from the Muslim provinces in the east. Putin also fawns over the Soviet Union, presenting a false nationalism where the Soviet Union is supposed to be separated from communism. It is Soviet times that he wants to found Russian identity on, not the many centuries of Russian history before that. It is a vast insult to the more than 60 million Russians, Ukrainians and others who were murdered by the Soviets – most of them the best people in Russia, setting the country back not just temporally but permanently, by removing millions of people with West European ancestry, who were the middle class that made things work. The Soviet Union was an attack on Russia, and Putin praises it. Sick.
But he is playing his own game. And he has given support to Syria, which the Israeli lobby wants destroyed because it helps Hezbollah, which formed to protect the Syrian people and the Palestinians when Israel invaded Lebanon to massacre thousands. Putin has also given weak support to Iran, which has dared support the Hezbollah and the Palestinians (even though the Palestinians are Sunni and Greek Orthodox, while Iran is Shia). And for that the globalists want Russia controlled. That’s what their actions in Ukraine are about. Just like their actions in Georgia, Belarus (failed), and elsewhere in the encirclement.
So while Putin is not a friend of Western nationalists or Russian nationalist groups, he stands in the globalists’ way, and for that he deserves some approval. He is a KGB reactionary, simply put. But it is better to have a KGB reactionary in charge than a globalist. And a KGB reactionary can possibly come to do more good in the future.
LikeLike
You mean where the parliament voted to remove the president from power? How is that a coup?
LikeLike
Can you please send us a link to the evidence it was a coup?
LikeLike
Arbiter, just want to say, from this comment of yours and others I’ve seen: heartening stuff. There’s a vast wasteland of idiocy and propaganda out there, and you slash through the bull and have a knack for tying things together. All that said, just to add my own perspective: don’t underestimate how much Putin acts against Russian nationalism. You’re obviously smart and informed, but I don’t know if you know – in several measures, Russia is actually worse than the US, certainly, and Europe too, really, in regards to freedom of speech and association issues for nationalist types, and even immigration policy. This has accelerated in recent years (almost seems like Putin maybe used Medvedev to lead the charge on a lot of this stuff). As Steve Sailer recently said. Putin is much more about building a multicultural regional empire (and looking out for #1, I should add), than in building a strong Russian ethno-state. You know that, but the degree to which that’s, sadly, true… sucks. It’s really hard to see how things can develop in a positive direction, for ethnic Russians, under Putin’s grip, to the point where anything else almost seems better, if only because it allows a possibility, however sleight, of change.
LikeLike
http://nypost.com/2014/03/17/airbnb-renter-claims-he-returned-home-to-an-orgy/
“A comedian under the impression he had rented out his posh Chelsea pad to a man with family in town for a wedding returned home to a wild orgy, he said.
Ari Teman, 31, claimed he left his apartment keys with David Carter, 32, on Friday night and stepped out for dinner before leaving town.
When he returned to the building to grab his luggage, a rowdy sex party featuring ‘Big Beautiful Women’ was in the process of being shut down by building management.
‘This was just so bizarre,’ said Teman, who had rented his apartment via the website Airbnb. ‘The worst part of the Internet right there was in my apartment.'”
LikeLike
A woman with a man that truly turns her on is most likely going to try to down play or obscure this truth. Otherwise, competition might be aroused.
When a woman actually is announcing how “good” her man is… well, you would not want to be him.
LikeLike
Yeah, when your woman feels that she has to prove how good you are, you’re in trouble. She shouldn’t need to validate you to others if she’s really hooked, and your worth should come through very quickly to those of her social circle that you meet.
LikeLike
Married feminists of course will never admit that the scalzified losers who settled for them aren’t sexy, exciting men who make them swoon with love.
—Until they divorce them in 5 years or so. Because they’re not haaaapppy (thanks Dalrock). And then go on being pumped and dumped by progressively (lol) more beta men until the inevitable happens: eat, pray, love, cats, oblivion.
Future rape!
LikeLike
“They don’t see people in their lives as full human beings. They see them as a role being played in their lives. The actor is replaceable – it’s the role that matters. The only non-replaceable actor is herself, the star of the show.”
I noticed these feminists often place importance onto “being the star of your own life”. Last thing I wanna worry about is whether my life could make a good TV show. People are served by taking what makes them content, not keeping up appearances.
Same thing for that ridiculous and vaguely depressive idea that we should care about what our funeral will be like and how many people will cry.
LikeLike
Or for that matter, putting on a $20,000 wedding just at the point in your life when you need to pay down debt or accumulate some cash.
The $20,000 wedding that causes the financial stress that leads to divorce. Brilliant.
LikeLike
Same thing for that ridiculous and vaguely depressive idea that we should care about what our funeral will be like and how many people will cry.
It’s a measure of how popular and well liked we were. That appeals to our vanity.
LikeLike
“Being the star of your own movie” is not necessarily the behavior of a feminist; it’s the behavior of a pathological narcissist. NPDs come in both sexes.
LikeLike
I see. I guess I noticed it in feminists, because some of them worry their boyfriend will be more impressive than they are. Feminism encourages women to compete with their men and look for signs of patriarchy in him. That means he shouldn’t have too much power, and shouldn’t eclipse her, or else she becomes a part of the problem.
LikeLike
Studies have shown that there is a correlation between narcissism and liberal ideologies like feminism. Makes sense, right?: “I’m a morally superior person so I adhere to a morally superior belief system such as forced income redistribution”
LikeLike
Spoken like a cold, heartless, childless modern woman. If you were a parent–a father, anyway–you most certainly would think every waking moment about being a good dad so your kids would care if you died.
LikeLike
I didn’t say one shouldn’t care about close relationships with friends and family. Those are very important while alive – a big part of happiness. I basically said “When I’m dead, I will feel nothing”, and that’s true. I don’t need a big show of a funeral. None of us will be remembered forever.
LikeLike
Lol. Not all men are built the same. Same goes for women. Some people just aren’t sexy, and they make up for it in other ways.
LikeLike
you’ve missed the point entirely.
LikeLike
No I haven’t. Hot, sexy guys are known to be “d-bags”. I wish blogs like this would stop chalking it up to feminists being cock-hungry whores who “settle” for betas who then support their lifestyle.
IMO, betas should feel lucky that they ever get their dick wet. If you ever look at the population mating distribution for deer, you would see that only the top 10% of male deer really get any action, the so called alphas, and they impregnate almost the entire population of female deer. Most “betas” die w/o even mating once. I think that w/o forced monogamy, this is the trend our population follows. Just take a look at a college campus or a bar scene.
The trade-off of marrying a less sexually desirable “beta” is spending the rest of your life being treated with love and respect, instead of being around an egotistical asshole (that’s a real scientific term😉)
[CH: an alpha spectre haunts your past. a shiver caresses your present.]
LikeLike
You need to do some research work in Haiti or Africa.
LikeLike
Either that, or to take up the violin… to give her jaw a rest.
LikeLike
Brutal hilarity
LikeLike
lol……the word today is baggage.
LikeLike
Are you sure you’re as smart as you think you are? You still fail to see cause and effect or why men should patiently accept their lot in life and beg for your rotten little snatch when they can throw the chess board over and take what they like.
LikeLike
Wow, that was offensive. I don’t think anyone should BEG for my snatch. I was raised by a feminist, she didn’t allow me to keep expensive gifts or get the princess treatment. I was put to work, and I was taught to earn my keep. You can “throw the chess board” but you’d just end up screwing yourself over.
LikeLike
It’s a question of basic respect for the men who provide this little thing called civilization for you so you can look down on them. Why should they play by the rules you demand they play by when those rules are skewed against them for your sake so you can remain spoiled and consider them invisible and unworthy of basic human consideration. This lack of empathy for men is the biggest reason women need to be kept on a short leash.
LikeLike
Because I’m not spoiled. I’ve never cheated on a bf. I treat my bf with respect, cook him dinner, rub his back and do his laundry. I make him feel like a man. The thing is, I feel like less than a woman. After I do all these kind things for him, I go back to my books and I study. It’s what my family expects of me, it’s what he expects of me, and I deal with it. You’re right, in an ideal world, men would be respected for their role in society, but this is the downfall of patriarchy, and it’s less than ideal. I believe that society will eventually stabilize and it will go back to its previous state, though.
LikeLike
Lol CH. It’s not a spectre. I’ve dated betas the past 5 years. My mother informed me to steer clear of manly men b/c they are assholes. So I did. Now I’m currently dating a “manly” type of guy, and speaking from experience. There are certain things that are better in our relationship, and others that are worse. You can guess what the trade-off was.
[CH: love.]
LikeLike
There are different kinds of love. I no longer wear the pants in the relationship, my freedom has been greatly restricted, and I had to start thinking about people other than myself. I’m not complaining, I’m just stating facts. Before, I had free reign to do whatever I needed to do to succeed in school and become a provider, and now the focus is shifted on him succeeding, providing, blah blah blah.
I have mixed feelings about it all, all I know is that when a “feminist” calls her hubbie amazing, it isn’t a backhanded compliment, it’s the truth. She wouldn’t be where she is today without him. I think you make it out to be a bigger deal than it is.
LikeLike
“IMO, betas should feel lucky that they ever get their dick wet.”
That’s fine, as long as you don’t advocate for the theft of the betas’ earned resources via back-end coercive taxation such as income tax. Because if you’re taking their resources they should get something in return. If you think they should be left alone (no wetness for their dicks) then they should be left alone (no reaching into their paychecks)
LikeLike
That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Everyone who gets a paycheck in this country pays an income tax. No one is entitled to sex, you have to work for it. If everyone who pays an income tax DESERVES sex, I feel bad for whichever one of you that gets STUCK with banging Kirstie Alley. IT’S THE LAW. See where I’m coming from?
LikeLike
You haven’t made the connection between bloated govt spending and less restricted female hypergamy. The govt collects most taxes from men, but the spending isn’t mostly on men, which would be more fair. The spending is mostly on women. It goes to women in many forms: govt jobs (teachers, bureaucrats, etc), jobs at nonprofits that receive govt grants, jobs in academia that receive govt grants, and jobs that are protected via corrupt govt licensing schemes. You might say “well if these women have these jobs, at least they’re working for their money” but it doesn’t mean much. No one in his right mind would voluntarily pay as much or as often for these crap govt jobs with his own earned money because these jobs don’t provide proportional value to the consumer. The jobs are paid for via coercion instead of voluntarily, which is a good indicator that they’re crap. And that’s just the women who get men’s redistributed money by “working” for it. It doesn’t count all the money they receive for free: food stamps, section 8 housing, Obamaphones, “tax credits”, etc, etc, etc. By living off the stolen resources of the betas without having to give anything of themselves back, women are free to pursue alphas without the would-be natural consequences such as starving to death when the alphas don’t have the desire or the resources to provide for them.
So if men weren’t taxed as much and women weren’t given so many freebies by the coercive govt, then women would have to trade directly with men for the resources that they wanted from men. Many of these trades would probably involve sex in some way: becoming a man’s wife, girlfriend, mistress, prostitute, etc. Just as women wouldn’t be “owed” survival by society, the beta male earners wouldn’t be “owed” sex by society, but their means to negotiate for sex wouldn’t be stolen from them by society either. Then more beta male earners would be justly compensated for their contributions to society, instead of just being robbed to pay for hypergamous women’s behavior.
Besides, income tax is a grand lie that the masses have swallowed. A superior basis of taxation would be taxing access to natural resources such as land, fossil fuels, minerals, and the earth’s limited ability to absorb pollution. The only thing that necessarily collectivizes us is the planet that we all must share, so it makes sense for us to compensate society for restricting them from a part of the earth. Each person’s labor is his own business, so it’s immoral to tax a person for his own labor. It’s a form of theft/ slavery.
LikeLike
That’s a lot of words expended, for no apparent purpose, if said purpose was to dissuade the cooze of her misconceptions.
You guys should know this already.
LikeLike
I understand that you believe that these women are making off with your hard-earned money with no consequence to themselves, but you’re wrong. Only one year ago, I was the most hardcore feminist you’d ever meet. My friends, both male and female were like-minded, and i have a lot of life-experience on this topic. These “feminists” are lonely as hell. They want a relationship, but are so conditioned to believe that “men are assholes” that they’re terrified to put themselves out there. They’ve been told that they’ve been oppressed by men, when in reality, patriarchy was a system that worked. In 99% of cases, it gave it’s participants a slice of the good life. It’s only when something’s gone that you can start to appreciate it.
I guarantee that these women have their fair share of problems. After all, last I checked, the population of depressed females is twice that of males. DOUBLE. If anyone’s getting screwed over by feminism, it’s women.
LikeLike
Cleopatra, for some reason I can’t reply to your latest down there, so I’m reply to your previous here. Anyhow, you wrote: ” After all, last I checked, the population of depressed females is twice that of males. DOUBLE. If anyone’s getting screwed over by feminism, it’s women.”
I agree that feminism is bad for women also, but that’s not what we were discussing. We were talking about how the FORCE OF LAW has been perverted into stealing men’s resources and giving them to women. Without this violation, the men might’ve spent those resources on sexual/ reproductive opportunities and the women would’ve had some accountability. If the beta can earn enough to trade for sex, then he should be able to get his dick wet. This is in contrast to your earlier statement “IMO, betas should feel lucky that they ever get their dick wet.” My argument is about property rights, yours is about feelings.
Anyhow, women’s depression? Could be from guilt of being a fence for stolen goods, could be from time wasted on unfulfilling degrees and careers that don’t really offer much value to society, could be the lack of accountability and the implied low expectations that society has for them, could be from the lack of fulfillment that they would’ve otherwise had if they persued marriage & kids. I dunno, I focus on facts.
LikeLike
I guarantee that these women have their fair share of problems. After all, last I checked, the population of depressed females is twice that of males. DOUBLE. If anyone’s getting screwed over by feminism, it’s women.
And yet, given how many FAT YOUNG women I see around, the message isn’t getting through.
LikeLike
Your issue is that these women are getting food, shelter, etc, for free, and therefore don’t need to have a man in order to survive. My question is: are you really that unattractive that you would take away government assistance from a single mother with kids, just so she would sleep with you? You know there’s prostitutes for that. I’m literally disgusted. Everyone pays that tax, and you shouldn’t be exempt just because you’re not getting action.
What I was getting at, with my previous comment, is that for every lonely, depressed feminist, there is an equally lonely, sex-starved beta. Had the beta been the one who became a provider, and the feminist a home-maker, they would have a nice little situation going on. The balance would be restored. Unfortunately this is not the case. Beta has no way of capturing the feminist’s attention, and the feminist is too busy looking for Prince Charming (that she THINKS she deserves) to notice that there is someone, just for her, right under her nose.
LikeLike
My question is: are you really that unattractive that you would take away government assistance from a single mother with kids, just so she would sleep with you?
Good lord no. But I am in favor of cutting off assistance to single moms with kids so that — wait for it — other women don’t decide to become single moms with kids. Make sense?
Supply and demand, incentives, and all that. You should look up those terms.
LikeLike
The female hamster, in full swing, with occasional moments of clarity and realization thrown in to make the spinning all the more sad:
http://myfriendsaremarried.tumblr.com/
LikeLike
Well said COTW. it really decribes alot of women today not just the femcunts or narcissistic ones like the ‘real housewives of ‘xxx city’.
Take a culture where fame and fortune is the highly sought prize. Add a legacy of having the world’s most competitive workforce; most ambitious original immigrant class (european); and most independant, freedom and rights loving individuals; best technology; equal rights, blah blah blah, and you are going to evolve a strong, entitled woman who will need to be restrained by strong men..which includes violence if necessary…to break the bitches.
(Some would look at a cowboy breaking a wild horse as abuse too).
Of course, the typical American man was/is too beta for this task — more like a bewildered Dr. Frankenstein witnessing the birth of the monster he has created.
“Its Alive!! Its Alive!!”
LikeLike
Isnt it strange how many guys fail to make the connection in their minds? They see these idiots swooning, fainting and having near orgasms in public when in the presence of famous men, the Justin Biebers, the beatles, etc., and don’t realize that if their wives aren’t acting giddy and excited and ready to get on all fours on the sidewalk for the world to see you drill her, she’s JUST NOT THAT INTO YOU.
They just chalk it up to feeling excited, not realizing that a ridiculously horny woman doesn’t behave like a man. THey’ve never been around a woman who wants them and don’t realize how they’re supposed to behave. They dont make the connection when seeing these dummies at concerts and political rallies.
Men get boners everyday (hopefully). Women are lucky to meet an attractive man once a month.
LikeLike
Kinda like how single moms invariably refer to their sons as “my amazing son.” Invariably.
LikeLike
And my son “who is my world.” lzozlzozlzozozlz
Actually the sometimes say “my amazing little man.”
LikeLike
Women throw around “amazing” like it’s a Frisbee, rather than the manhole cover it should be.
LikeLike
Little Vova Putin is a fucking bureaucrat-in-chief with hairless man boobs, and an incompetent who continues to preside over Russia’s economic, technological and geopolitical decline while he throws Olympic parties and acquires new territory full of unemployed Tatars and aging pensioners looking for handouts. Brilliant. It’s nice that he’s against gay marriage and all, but notice that living dynamic societies, like the Chinese and the South Koreans, have more important things to worry about. Hell, at this point freaking Nigeria is doing better than Russia. Vova is a Beta dressed up as an Alpha for public consumption. The boys from Pravyi Sektor are the real alphas, and Putin would shit his pajamas if he had to spend 5 minutes with them.
LikeLike
Yeah, what you say is probably true in most respects, but compared to 0bama or any of the Euroweenies, Vova is super-alpha.
However, the Chinese and Koreans are now demographically worse off than the Russians, believe it or not.
LikeLike
LikeLike
How I wish I could unsee that.
LikeLike
That vid would be a disgrace to the Aborigine race.
LikeLike
The Tuareg don’t show their face in public (much less other things), because its impolite.
LikeLike
The wife looks sad. She thinks of her beta husband and how she will never be desired by high value men like the strippers.
LikeLike
This Saturday night, my new band The Thirsty Betas will do a one-night stand at the Carousel on 4th and Main.
Our sister act The Vulvas will open for us.
LikeLike
Good beatdown vid:
Ni66er talks shit he caint back up; gets made null and void:
LikeLike
That vid gives me no pleasure… just like no man cares to witness an obstreperous animal being beaten, ‘though it may deserve as much.
I’m the type of guy that would have broken it up after the first two hits.
LikeLike
Understandable Greg, but you are a man formed in a different age, and age before every punk began “carrying.”
Nowadays?
If you get in a street fight you need to disable your attacker in a minimum of 3 swings. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know it feels good and looks cool to to ground and pound…
but if the Zimmerman/Martin fiasco taught us anything its this:
Make it quick.
Once the fight starts don’t be afraid to end it in the shortest amount of moves possible.
LikeLike
No, I no longer notice this stuff, because I no longer go on FB and, unlike CH, I cannot stomach reading Salon or similar garbage.
LikeLike
That’s it, just bomb Russia back to the Stone Age. What? You mean Russia has viable armed forces AND nukes so we can’t just invade?
Seriously, I never will understand the hard on CH has for Putin.
[CH: You miss the subtext. Putin is a personified shiv, nothing more.]
How easy is it to act like a tough guy when you have a big military (and more importantly, nukes) to prevent a violent response?
I’ve got a deal, let’s have Putin wrestle my 64 year old uncle: no tapping out, it’s to the death. Mano y Mano, one vs one, no weapons (or equal weapons) and see if pooty poot is willing to do that. I mean, my uncle has 3 years on him. Pooty is ex-KGB, my uncle is retired USMC FR. I think it’s a fair fight. I mean, shirtless fights bears, right?
LikeLike
“I’ve got a deal, let’s have Putin wrestle my 64 year old uncle: no tapping out, it’s to the death.”
Putin would fuck your uncle six ways from Sunday.
He started legit functional grappling arts since he was 11 years old.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/08/vladimir-putin-judo_n_3726370.html
“In fact, the Russian president is a black belt in judo, having practiced the martial art since the age of 11 and later earning a Master of Sports in judo. He even penned a book about the history, theory, and practice of the Japanese art of fighting, and released an instructional DVD entitled, “Let’s Learn Judo with Vladimir Putin.” (Do yourself a favor and watch the full-length video below.)”
LikeLike
I’ll take on the winner, if only for sporting amusement.
LikeLike
He was quoting the original CH post… the meaning was clear enough, ‘though the wording misapplied.
LikeLike
Yes but the thrust of the post combined with the error made it ironic. Which was just tits.
LikeLike
When a woman retorts about how tough her beta husband is, you know he is anything but. It’s always a hipster looking white guy who got by his youth by being sarcastic, and gets by his middle age by growing a scraggly beard and spouting off about equality.
Get right in their face, and tell them that empathy is weakness, and they reflect that weakness. Nothing ever happens. They’ll complain, but that’s about it.
LikeLike
To feminists wonderful husband = ‘does what I say without question’… likely their asses got dumped by a handful of alpha males who didn’t care what they said… they probably do feel a bit lucky to have a guy which agrees with them on some level
LikeLike
H1EgmL http://www.QS3PE5ZGdxC9IoVKTAPT2DBYpPkMKqfz.com
LikeLike
Great scene from Eastbound and Down Season 4 Episode 1.
It’s the scene where Kenny Powers’ wife gets a company award and publicly thanks Kenny for being …well, go to 14:25 and watch it, it’s embedded so it’s easy to open and watch:
http://www.alluc.to/tv-shows/watch-eastbound-and-down-online/season-04/episode-01/552184.html
LikeLike
I’d like to send this to cheap aldactone Before turning ON the power switch, connection to
LikeLike
We went to university together order trihexyphenidyl online ability to retrieve patient data, perform basic disease assessment, and prioritizing patient
LikeLike
magic story very thanks sandoz tamsulosin Prescription/Service Reference Number, NDC/HCPCS (if not a compound),
LikeLike
very best job hoodia 57 4.4. Manage resources in accordance with legal regulations; institutional policies; and ethical,
LikeLike
Canada>Canada buy cheap drospirenone 2.4.1.1-2 shows the claim as it appears after the adjustment has been made.
LikeLike
Will I be paid weekly or monthly? buy generic nexium capsules, ointment, etc. Also, state the physicians directions in this box.
LikeLike
This site is crazy 🙂 bactrim cream Dunia before you go.
LikeLike
Yes, I love it! etoricoxib msd In accordance with the Pharmaceutical Schedule, only a quantity sufficient to provide 5 days
LikeLike
How long have you lived here? http://www.lancashiretourismawards.co.uk/the-event/ erythromycin costs prescribers to post their prescriptions on the MEVS system.
LikeLike
Will I have to work shifts? http://thebusinessphone.com/africas-potential cheap generic topamax developing mutually agreed upon treatment goals to the degree possible.
LikeLike
I can’t stand football lansoprazole clopidogrel Minimize the difference. Stress the difference.
LikeLike
Incorrect PIN tadalafil tadacip 20 mg TELUS Health Solutions is a leader in telehealth, electronic health records, remote patient monitoring, mobile home and
LikeLike
In tens, please (ten pound notes) pantoprazole online and askaris (guards) and cared for by a loyal set of helpers, some of whom have worked with us for over ten years.
LikeLike
Which year are you in? hoodia 57 This Public Announcement updates information on the continuing threat of terrorist
LikeLike
I’d like to order some foreign currency where shold i buy viagra in mumbai 2.11 Prior Auth Type Code and Prior Auth Number Submitted (Rev. 02/05)
LikeLike
I’m interested in this position viagra online 150 * adopted by the membership of the American Pharmacists Association October 27, 1994.
LikeLike
I work for a publishers levitra free trials Accountability logs see sample logs in Appendix 1 (per drug) and Appendix 2 (per patient)
LikeLike
Could you give me some smaller notes? cialis cost uk For writing, it is best to use a felt tip pen with a fine point. Avoid ballpoint pens that skip; do not use pencils,
LikeLike
I came here to work http://parametricmodel.com/casino-winpot-playa-del-carmen-telefono/ choctaw casino players club rewards Protective coverings such as plastic wrap, aluminum foil or imperviously-backed absorbent
LikeLike
I’ve just graduated triple toucan slots free Questions: Answers questions in a logical fashion; accuracy of answers 1
LikeLike
How do you do? http://researchindia.in/roulette-app-for-pc-download-free/ play roulette online free no limit The Office of Experiential Training and Continuing Pharmacy Education -TSU COPHS Page 31
LikeLike
A First Class stamp poker online free no download Training no more than two days after the incident. Clearance must be provided by the
LikeLike
I’ve got a part-time job national socialist movement necessary redesign · Assess medication use, response to therapy (Can
LikeLike
Children with disabilities prezzi viagra generico 5. Respects the patient’s need for confidentiality
LikeLike
Is this a temporary or permanent position? buy generic cialis online safely 2. Pharmacy receives a rejection that the NDC 16 NDC is not on file. 2. Pharmacy needs to call the PerformRx
LikeLike