• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Imagination Test: A Game Routine
You’ll Know You’re An Alpha Male If… »

Before You Say Nonconsensual Sex Isn’t Pleasurable, See These 8 Facts From An Esteemed Sexologist

April 1, 2014 by CH

1. Girls love selfish badboys.

2. Nonconsensual erotic rape fantasies are more common among women than previously thought.

3. Girls love dominant men who take what they want.

4. Girls hate men who do as they’re told.

5. Girls hate sensitive, emotionally available men.

6. Girls love men who take charge.

7. Girls love it when men touch them without asking.

8. Girls love men with “appetitive-aggressive” tendencies.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Alpha, Biomechanics is God, Dating, The Pleasure Principle, Ugly Truths | 172 Comments

172 Responses

  1. on April 1, 2014 at 12:21 pm Carlos Danger

    Science validates common sense once again.

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 12:25 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      here’sz waht matthew kingz mom had 2 sya baouts it:

      lzlzozozozozoz

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 12:43 pm Grim

        The man in that still shot of the vid (didn’t watch the vid) takes steroids.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 7:13 pm Tilikum

        or understands his diet you mean

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 4:39 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        What movie is the third GIF from?

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 7:28 am Grim

        No. A white man cannot get vascularity like that without roids. Period I know. I’ve worked out hard, clean for 30 years and my arms and shoulders are as close as possible to that but missing that little something that roids add.

        If you disagree, you are simply wrong. The dude in that vid juices.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 10:30 pm Survivorman

        What? The? Fuck?

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 5:37 am Zombie Shane

        What happened to Matthew King?

        What happened to JayInDC?

        It was like suddenly those dudes just vanished.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 6:45 am thwack

        Jay is in jail.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 4:51 pm Theodore Logan

        Even if he is, he is probably keepin’ it real in there too:

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 4:10 pm Bel Riose

        Our resident Jesuit dipshit will be back after Lent, I’m sorry to say…

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 2:04 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

      Rape.

      LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 3:05 pm Zombie Shane

      > “7. Girls love it when men touch them without asking.”

      Whew.

      Gotta hold strong frame right there.

      The moment she senses any betatudinal self-doubt in you, she’ll immediately reclassify you as “creepy”, and suddenly you could find yourself sitting in a jail cell looking at some felony sexual assault charges.

      Attempt on the modern hyper-nihilistic university campus at your own risk.

      And preserve strong, strong frame throughout.

      Do not waiver in your commitment to dominate her.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 3:28 pm corvinus

        Gotta hold strong frame right there.

        The moment she senses any betatudinal self-doubt in you, she’ll immediately reclassify you as “creepy”

        Ironically, in the past, whenever I got that term slapped on me, it was because I made thirsty but halfhearted attempts on girls in the 5-6.5 range — average to slightly cute. The self-doubt came through, but because I wasn’t sure that I really wanted that girl because she wasn’t hot enough.

        LikeLike


    • on April 3, 2014 at 1:05 am Steve

      A study of the “Herbivore Men”:

      http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/m-g-t-o-w/a-real-study-of-japanese-herbivore-men/

      LikeLike


    • on April 4, 2014 at 11:27 am Steve H

      i can’t believe this didn’t come from upworthy dot com.

      LikeLike


  2. on April 1, 2014 at 12:22 pm Before You Say Nonconsensual Sex Isn’t Pleasurable, See These 8 Facts From An Esteemed Sexologist | Manosphere.com

    […] Before You Say Nonconsensual Sex Isn’t Pleasurable, See These 8 Facts From An Esteemed Sexologist […]

    LikeLike


  3. on April 1, 2014 at 12:24 pm The Burninator

    All fine and well as far as clinical observations, but I’m not entirely certain that inspiring men towards rape is a great idea (“Well, if they really like it when I don’t let them consent, I need to try this!”). Spur them to get past the soft “no”, yeah, sure, but a hard no is a hard no, and if they cross that line they get to spend the rest of their lives paying for it, in spades. All men are just one police call away from perpetual bankruptcy, years in prison and no job opportunities once they’re released, not to mention being on a fun list and in constant contact with every sheriff’s office they live even vaguely around, for the rest of their lives.

    Know the limits guys and never let things get too far out of hand.

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 12:56 pm Scray

      the business of my uss enterprise is risk, ya heard.

      LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 2:48 pm Wilson

      It’s the guys who talk women into sex that they want to put in jail with “affirmative consent” laws, and of course if it’s advantageous to them they’ll claim rape even if they initiated sex. Really the safest course is rape with demented brutality, since women will blame themselves or “keep his secret” if they tremble in fear. Sadly, most men have little interest in fucking an unwilling subject, the average drone doesn’t even have it in him to violate a corpse, so they are doomed to remain women’s chained dogs

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 3:19 pm Zombie Shane

        > “Really the safest course is rape with demented brutality, since women will blame themselves or “keep his secret” if they tremble in fear.”

        Videotape Game FTW.

        Your lawyer walks into the conference room with the Asst Ditrict Atty, and says, “I got a little video here I’d like y’all to watch. By my count, the alleged victim shouts ‘Oh my God!’ on six different occasions, ‘Don’t stop!’ on seven different occasions, and, judging from the gyrations and thrustings of her pelvis, achieves an obvious and incontrovertible orgasm on a bare minimum of five different occasions.”

        Bonus points if your attorney looks like that Kimberly Guilfoyle MILF-whore on “The Five”, who, believe it or not, actually has a JD:

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 3:52 pm Laguna Beach Fogey

        Any pleasure derived from seeing the brunette milf Guilfoyle is voided by the sight of that fucking commie ogre Bob Beckel.

        Get that fat bastard off the air.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 9:12 pm Rick Derris

        UGH – Beckel is such a fat, conniving piece of shit that he makes Jabba look like a paragon of slimmed down virtue

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 9:53 am Subway Masturbator

        you seem to prefer concentrating on men. me too! Go homo!

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 10:29 am Rick Derris

        Wow! You sure put me in my place.

        What brilliant logic – pointing out that a guy is a ruhtard is indicative of latent homosexuality.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 5:11 am Arbiter

        So Wilson, the safest course is to rape a woman at knifepoint, instead of talking her into having sex?

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 5:17 pm Charles

      The post didn’t inspire men to rape. I’m assuming that it was posted to illustrate the female psyche.

      LikeLike


    • on April 3, 2014 at 12:02 am Steve

      http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=871831

      Hmmm…

      LikeLike


  4. on April 1, 2014 at 12:31 pm Grim

    96% of women like to be tied up for light (no pain) bondage in bed with their approved lovers. It’s fun. Women do not want to be actually raped by a gross homeless guy who jumps out of the bushes with a knife.

    All normal sex in the animal kingdom is pre-approved near-rape. If you don’t believe, me watch squirrels or birds in your neighborhood, or lions on the Discovery Channel. There is a “chase” after which the female eventually gives in. The “chase” in the human world is the stuff that requires game, that CH teaches us about.

    Humans are meat eating mammals, and we behave similarly to gorillas and wolves and lions. At least instinctively, when that takes over…yes, most women fantasize about rape and like being tied up by their pre-approved partner while she is in love with him.

    The other 4% of women suffer from some kind of childhood trauma, such as actual rape/child abuse or over-teaching of Catholic religious guilt, and these women are not fun to have sex with in general.

    Rape fantasies are normal. If you search for BDSM on the internet, you will not find a thousand images and videos. Rather, you will find a thousand separate websites, each with tens of thousands of images and videos.

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 12:37 pm The Burninator

      Aye, it’s the “pre-approved” that’s the real take home here.

      LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 1:07 pm whorefinder

      Women do not want to be actually raped by a gross homeless guy who jumps out of the bushes with a knife.

      –now, now whorefinder is never gross.

      And who needs a knife?

      “does this smell like chloroform to you?”

      Homeless rape!

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 5:51 pm Matthew

        You stumped me with “homeless”. None of the rhymes are funny.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 1:29 pm edwardwaverley

        “You stumped me with ‘homeless’. None of the rhymes are funny.”

        True but we could try it with bum rape. Speaker is female:

        Tramp Seeks Tramp

        I don’t want a beta provider
        a simpering resource divider.
        I won’t love a dashing young turk,
        nor even a debonair jerk.

        To render me gasping agape
        I need to experience rape.
        I know ’round the mountain I’d come
        to play rape with the neighborhood bum.

        As he stumbles alluringly near
        with his gin-addled grin and his leer,
        and accosts me without my permission,
        all the dregs of my id start to wishin’

        that he’ll yank me right into his alley
        to assault my near-quivering valley.
        Though I’m trying to straighten my dress
        and to vocalize “no,” I’m a mess

        of frightfully strange contradictions.
        And I’m finding that civil restrictions
        are a cramp to my hideous kink,
        that I wonder what mother would think

        could she see me receiving attentions
        from nefarious, strange uber-menschen
        in a dark semi-public demesne?
        Better not to examine that vein

        up too close. Yet it’s dreadfully clear
        that an open-air climax is near!
        If this fantasy goes any further
        I may wind up a homeless man’s birther!

        But enough! I can’t think any longer
        of my rapey mysterious schlong-er.
        (He’d be homeless, and horny, and free!
        And he’d long just to rape only me!)

        I’ve resigned myself simply to ponder
        a vague thought of felicity yonder.
        With my husband I’ll gladly play dumb
        as I secretly yearn for a bum.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 4:16 pm Randy the Random

        As god is my witness, I will have this carved in stone. Never has art manifested itself in such pure a form.

        I believe you owe me a pair of XL boxers, for in my moment of gayness I lost control of my bladder.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 1:33 pm Arbiter

      96% of women like to be tied up for light (no pain) bondage in bed with their approved lovers. It’s fun. Women do not want to be actually raped by a gross homeless guy who jumps out of the bushes with a knife.

      Rectus. Discussion complete.

      Interesting link to that earlier CH thread about kino, with a study showing that touching a girl’s arm increased the chance of her agreeing to a dance or to giving a guy her number. To think that such brief kino has a discernible effect. One thing I do when I am out with a girl is cross the street where there is no zebra crossing, and then put my hand on her upper arm to guide her over, as if to keep her safe from cars.

      LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 2:02 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

      “Humans are meat eating mammals, and we behave similarly to gorillas and wolves and lions.”

      Here’rez a couple of thinfgz whihc gorillaz, wolvesz, and lions, nor wowmenz, did not dodoz:

      0. THE BIBLE
      1. Homer’s Iliad
      2. Homer’s Odyssey
      3. Exodus & Ecclesiastes & The Psalms
      4. Virgil’s Aeneid
      5. Socrates’ Apology
      6. The Book of Matthew & Jefferson’s Bible
      7. Plato’s Repulic
      8. Seneca’s Letters from a Stoic
      9. Aristotle’s Poetics
      10. Dante’s Inferno
      11. The Declaration of Independence
      12. The Constitution
      13. John Milton’s Paradise Lost
      14. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
      15. Newton’s Principia
      16. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations and Theory of Moral Sentiments
      17. Henry David Thoreau’s Walden
      18. Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn (& all of his work)
      19. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
      20. Ludwig von Mises’ A Theory of Money and Credit
      21. F.A. Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom
      22. Herman Melville’s Moby Dick
      23. Einstein’s The Meaning of Relativity
      24. Joseph Campbell’s The Hero With a Thousand Faces and The Power of Myth
      25. Ron Paul’s Revolution & End the Fed
      26. THE BIBLE

      llzozozoozlzozozo

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 2:02 pm Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        All men should begin immediately by reading the following books which the central bankers and their fellow churchians hate, fear, and detest:

        0. THE BIBLE
        1. Homer’s Iliad
        2. Homer’s Odyssey
        3. Exodus & Ecclesiastes & The Psalms
        4. Virgil’s Aeneid
        5. Socrates’ Apology
        6. The Book of Matthew & Jefferson’s Bible
        7. Plato’s Repulic
        8. Seneca’s Letters from a Stoic
        9. Aristotle’s Poetics
        10. Dante’s Inferno
        11. The Declaration of Independence
        12. The Constitution
        13. John Milton’s Paradise Lost
        14. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
        15. Newton’s Principia
        16. Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations and Theory of Moral Sentiments
        17. Henry David Thoreau’s Walden
        18. Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn (& all of his work)
        19. Shakespeare’s Hamlet
        20. Ludwig von Mises’ A Theory of Money and Credit
        21. F.A. Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom
        22. Herman Melville’s Moby Dick
        23. Einstein’s The Meaning of Relativity
        24. Joseph Campbell’s The Hero With a Thousand Faces and The Power of Myth
        25. Ron Paul’s Revolution & End the Fed
        26. THE BIBLE

        Please note that neither Dr. Helen Smith nor Michelle Malkin ever, ever, ever quote nor acknowledge THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN. Next time you see them, ask them why they never salute our EXALTED FATHERS and our NOBLE HERITAGE and the FOUNDATION OF NATURAL RIGHTS, THE FAMILY, FATHERHOOD, and NATURAL LAW.

        For instance, in her book http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/1594036756

        Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream – and Why It Matters

        why does Helen Smith never quote Moses nor Genesis nor Jesus who DEFINE MARRIAGE? Why does Helen Smith never quote Genesis?

        13: And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.
        14: And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
        15: And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
        16: Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

        DOES HELEN SMITH NOT REALIZE WHY MEN HAVE BOYCOTTED MARRIAGE? It is because it has been desouled, debauched, and bernankified, robbed of its exalted spirit, and transformed into yet another beenrnekified fraud to transfer assets from men to da beenrkeiified statez zlolzozoz.

        Why does HELEN SMITH never quote Moses? Did not Moses know a thing or two about BEING A MAN, even though he never negged, nor peacocked nor wore furry hatsz to get some pre-berbebenkiifed butthozlzizol buttcockinzg (which da noeocnths sectreletly tape zlzzoz):

        6 “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.

        7 “You shall have no other gods before[b] me.

        8 “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 9 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 10 but showing love to a thousandgenerations of those who love me and keep my commandments.

        11 “You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.

        12 “Observe the Sabbath day by keeping it holy, as the Lord your God has commanded you. 13 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 14 but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant,nor your ox, your donkey or any of your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns, so that your male and female servants may rest, as you do.15 Remember that you were slaves in Egypt and that the Lord your God brought you out of there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm.Therefore the Lord your God has commanded you to observe the Sabbath day.

        16 “Honor your father and your mother, as the Lord your God has commanded you, so that you may live long and that it may go well with you in the land theLord your God is giving you.

        17 “You shall not murder.

        18 “You shall not commit adultery.

        19 “You shall not steal.

        20 “You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.

        21 “You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife. You shall not set your desire on your neighbor’s house or land, his male or female servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.”

        RIGHT THERE WE SEE THAT “THOU SHALT NOT COVET THY NEIGHBOR’S WIVES ASS & THOU SHALT NOT COMMITT ADULTERY” meaning dat it is worng so very worng to buttcock someoenes future potential wife and tape it in sectrievz zlzzlzloozoz

        Why does DR. HELEN SMITH never quote JEsus? 3Some Pharisees came to Jesus, testing Him and asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason at all?”4And He answered and said, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE,5and said, ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH’?6“So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.”7They said to Him, “Why then did Moses command to GIVE HER A CERTIFICATE OF DIVORCE AND SEND her AWAY?”8He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way.9“And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery.

        So one can see that MOSES JESUS and GENESIS all agree dat der is to be no sectirve tapings of butthxte nor any transfer of a man’s welath to da beernnake state nor shall any other man be allwedz allowedz to buttcock nor ginacock your wifez. WHY DOES HELEN SMITH NOT QUOTE MOSES, NOR JESUS, NOR GENESIS? lzozoz DOES SHE NOT SEE THAT RETURNING TO THE EXALTED PRINCIPLES SET FORTH IN THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN WOULD RESURRECT MARRIAGE?

        Ask the neocons next time you see them–what do they have against the exalted wisdom of MOSES, JESUS, HOMER, and the GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN?

        And as men are reading the Great Books for Men, they must start enacting their principles in the living world, so as to exalt our legal system and universities, for it is not enough to think and read, but virtue is ultimately defined by *action*.

        One of the remarkable things you will learn by READING THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN is the contemporary inversion of Alpha and Beta.

        In THE GREAT BOOKS FOR MEN, the Alphas were ACHILLES, JESUS, ODYSSEUS, AENEAS (THE PIUS AENEAS), JEFFERSON, WASHINGTON, ADAMS, MADISON, HAMILTON.

        In all too much of pop manosphere and neoconthz culture, the Alphas are teh secrtetive tapers of buttehxt and the negging wearers of furry hatsz. While Odysseus and Christ and Aeneas resisted womanly and worldly temptations, the modern peacockingz neoconcth gamerz buttehxtesz them. Note how while Charlotte Allen of the Weekly Standard refrains from ever speaking of Odysseus or Achilles or Aeneas, she dutifully repeats the lies of sectrieve taperz of buttehxt whose films lost $10,000,000+ on $12,000,000 budgets, thusly fitting the neocons’ definition of “Art” scucucctetehe” and “”manliness” by creating more debt than wealth while butthetxingz.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 5:57 am Everything Is Water

        Not relevant to anything, and kind of insane, but an excellent post nonetheless.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 6:06 am Arbiter

        Boldly Stand Erect
        By Ragnar Redbeard

        Jewish books are for the Jews
        And Jew Messiahs too
        But if you’re not of Jewish blood
        How can they be for you?

        To make an idol of a book
        Is poison for the brain
        A dying god upon a cross
        Is reason gone insane

        Beware of all the holy books
        And all the creeds and schools
        And every law that man has made
        And all the golden rules

        “Laws” and “rules” imposed on you
        From days of old renown
        Are not intended for your good
        But for your crushing down

        Then dare to rend the chains that bind
        And to yourself be true
        Dare to liberate your mind
        From all things, old and new

        Always think your own thought
        All other thoughts reject
        Learn to use your own brain
        And boldly stand erect

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 9:28 am Great Books For Men GreatBooksForMen GBFM (TM) GB4M (TM) GR8BOOKS4MEN (TM) lzozozozozlzo (TM)

        zlzzozozlzlzo u said “erct”
        zlzozozooz omgz zlzozozololz zzoz omzgz zozofmozlzozoz

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 9:41 am guerrer0

        Books for men: God is the same in every religion, not only in the bible, whether you call him Jesus or Buddha. As is explained by this woman (In Spanish )

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2014 at 6:18 am Arbiter

        That’s funny. “god is the same in every religion”. I guess the only two religions you know about are Xtianity and Judaism. That is definitely not the same god as the Hindu gods, the Greek and Roman gods, the Shinto gods, the Chinese gods, the Norse gods. But I guess it’s forbidden for the most fanatic Xtians to learn about other religions, since you would see then that there are people who have other beliefs than you. Your eyes must remain closed.

        Oh no, a YouTube video! Instead of posting an argument, you post a video to speak for you. How typical. I guess it’s one step up from just posting a link, as Xtians usually do, hoping that people won’t take the time to read through whatever is on the other side.

        If “god is the same in every religion”, why do they have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT stories about the gods, different stories about the messages from these gods, different stories about how the world has come to be, etc etc? Judaism says that non-“Chosen” are animals given human form to serve the “Chosen”. You claim that is the same in every religion? Funny.

        How many gods do most religions have? More than one, right? Your claim that the Hebrew tribal god “is the same in every religion” falls right there, since Judaism-Xtianity-Islam demand that people believe there is only one supernatural creature controlling everyone. Not several.

        You worship a religion invented by a huckster desert people to flatter themselves. Then the tent maker Saul found a new gig in peddling that belief as something universal, and turning it to anti-strength, dropping it in the laps of the slaves and servants in the Roman Empire, who were drooling at the thought that the successful in society would be tortured forever after death while the weak would be rewarded. “The losers shall inherit the earth”, as the bibble says. “The first (successful) shall be the last and the last (lazy, failures, defeated) shall be the first.” “Turn the other cheek (an excuse for not fighting back – it isn’t because you are weak, but because you are moral!).”

        Hey, here’s a thought: all ideologies are the same! Because, let’s say, “idealism is the same in every belief”. Right?

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 9:45 am Anton

        Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 7:51 pm Canadian Friend

      My own “theory” is very similar to yours

      For tens of thousands of years sex pretty much always happened in the same way; the male taking the female aggressively almost like a rape.

      It was pretty much the only way sex happened, it was how humans reproduced just like most other species.

      romantic foreplay and asking for sex are relatively recent inventions

      Humans are the only species who has stopped taking females the way lions, dogs, deers and even some insects do.

      A lion or dog will bite the neck of the female to keep her from resisting or running away or fighting the male, and humans used to grab women’s hair or cover the woman’s mouth to keep her from screaming and calling for help

      Almost all other species do it the same way; the male aggressively takes the female – does not care if she is consenting – and kind of rapes her.

      If humans have been doing it for tens of thousands of years exactly the same way other species do, then it is highly probable that females were “programmed” to like it that way

      Like snoring or yawning these things have been “programmed ” in us forever even if in today’s world they seem to not make sense anymore.

      I think this explains why a lot of women have some rape fantasies and like to be dominated and rough handled during sex.

      It is in their DNA and has been from times immemorial.

      Humans have lived for much longer in caves and in the forest than they have lived in heated houses

      and human males have taken by force females for sex for much longer than they have been courting them and asking them if they could kiss them etc…

      our technology is modern and advanced, our social conventions are civilized but our genes are pretty much the same as those of cavemen.

      I am not saying it is ok to attack women and rape them, I am simply presenting a theory as to why the most common female fantasy is being taken by force by the male or “rape” fantasies.

      PS; I know this a bit convoluted but I never claimed to be a good writer.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 10:40 pm Survivorman

        Until about ~1965 — ALL human sex was what we now refer to as “rape”..

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 5:25 am Arbiter

        romantic foreplay and asking for sex are relatively recent inventions

        You have heard of romantic historical literature, I presume. There are tons of stories from way back in the Middle Ages where a man woos a woman through music, declarations of love and oaths to provide for her. Sex for most started with the wedding night, after it had been bought and paid for through marriage. That is a pretty costly way to ask for sex, paying for it by tying yourself to the woman as a provider for her and her children. (I am not saying this in a bitter way. It had to be that way, otherwise people wouldn’t survive.)

        Before Xtianity, a Norse woman had the right to divorce if her husband struck her, which of course also includes forcing himself upon her. (She also had a right to divorce if he did something shameful like wearing his shirt open over the chest in public, so that his chest hair could be seen.)

        The Romantic ideal during the Renaissance was a man loving a lady from afar, never sullying his love with something as vulgar and un-Christian as sex for pleasure. Before that, you had the many stories about knightly virtue so strong that a nobleman would go on a quest far away from his lady and love her only in thought. Due to the Church propaganda denouncing sex as dirty and bad, that was considered the highest love ideal: To love the woman so much that the knight stayed away from her for years and years, both of them in celibate.

        An example of this is Tristan and Isolde, where Tristan dutifully refrains from having sex with Isolde because he is tasked with transporting her to his king as a bride. Then follows scene after scene of love without ever thinking about sex. Even when they flee together after having been accused of infidelity, they live together in the forest without sex. (Well, depending on which version you read. In other versions, catering more to the crude commoners, sex is implied.)

        So not only was the ideal to heap praise and favor on a woman in order to gain her hand and then sex – refraining from sex was so highly praised that the more years spent away from each other the better. This is as far removed as forcing a woman to have sex as you can possibly get without becoming a monk. And not surprisingly, this is the culture that came up with the idea of celibate monks.

        LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 2:19 am LD

      Gorila = vegetarian & prone to isolation & depression….

      LikeLike


  5. on April 1, 2014 at 12:54 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

    Monsters, aliens, and man’s best friend:

    http://www.amazon.com/Cum-For-Bigfoot-Volume-Books/dp/1478209828

    http://www.amazon.com/Mars-Needs-MILFs-Jenna-Powers/dp/1481057510/ref=pd_sim_b_27?ie=UTF8&refRID=0XFC1S6BZ0MXXJ6PJ09T

    http://www.amazon.com/Doggie-Style-Angelicka-Wallows/dp/1481957678/ref=pd_sim_b_3?ie=UTF8&refRID=0XFC1S6BZ0MXXJ6PJ09T

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 1:09 pm Mitch Cumstein

      I still think your post last year was the best April Fool’s entry ever.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 1:53 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

        Yeah, I’d have to agree. I submitted that post to CH and gave him free reign of the material, knowing full well that he’d present it in the most interesting way possible. In all honesty, I didn’t even know it’d be used for that purpose until it showed up on the front page of CH that day. It was a welcome surprise for me, too. True to form, CH didn’t disappoint.

        As for this year, I didn’t send anything to CH with the intention of deceiving you depraved fucks on April Fool’s Day. I certainly thought about it, but decided that lightning doesn’t strike twice and it would be tough to top last year’s gimmick. It’s hard to outdo yourself when your first shot was a flash in the pan. Besides, sequels usually suck… unless you’re talking about tagging twin sisters.

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 1:54 pm The Burninator

        Heh, totally forgot it’s 4/1. I was pranked, d’oh!

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 7:00 pm Zombie Shane

        I don’t get it.

        What exactly is the prank?

        That CH himself is the “Esteemed Sexologist”?

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 1:18 pm Carlos Danger

      Truth is stranger than fiction.

      LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 4:23 pm Theodore Logan

      Earth needs MILFs too.

      LikeLike


  6. on April 1, 2014 at 12:59 pm Naz

    Whorefinder might have something to say regarding this post

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 1:05 pm whorefinder

      You would be right, sir!

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 3:52 pm Theodore Logan

        I actually thought you were guest posting for CH today.

        LikeLike


  7. on April 1, 2014 at 1:06 pm whorefinder

    This is why whorefinder is ever ladies favorite man…on their lonely walks down darkened parking garages.

    April Fools rape!

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 7:02 pm Zombie Shane

      killer walking a chick down a lonely dark street and then chloroform her.

      LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 7:02 pm Zombie Shane

      NCIS – on tonight’s episode – just had a serial killer walking a chick down a lonely dark street and then chloroforming her.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 7:21 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

        “This isn’t my first rapeo.”

        LikeLike


  8. on April 1, 2014 at 1:34 pm Amy

    1 through 8 can all take place within the context of consent!

    [CH: It *can*. That doesn’t mean women wouldn’t prefer their “consent” with a little ambiguity.]

    Why is this so hard to understand?

    [On tap: Projection Ale.]

    Sometimes you alarm me.

    [Women’s sexual nature is alarming.]

    Or maybe it’s an April Fools post.

    [We see what we want to see.]

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 10:39 pm burke

      “1 through 8 can all take place within the context of consent!”

      This would fall under the category of don’t listen to what they say, watch what they do. There are few simpler ways to avoid getting laid than asking permission as you progress along the way.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 11:21 pm Amy

        No, this would fall under the category of reading comprehension fail. Did I say step by step permission, or even affirmative consent? No I didn’t.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 7:29 am Charlie Don't Surf

        Actions can be equally deceiving – if not more so.

        Establish a ‘safe word’.

        From the start, give her a word – corn chip or football – that becomes the code word between you and her that means ‘stop’.

        When a woman is getting off by acting out a dominance and rape fantasy with you – part of her script is to resist with ‘no’s’ and ‘don’t’ and ‘stop’. Which is confusing to you and frustrating to her – since that’s not at all what she wants – and those words are generally her queues for you to get rough.

        LikeLike


  9. on April 1, 2014 at 1:54 pm Big Game Hunter

    Trust it to CH to make an April Fool’s prank that’s actually truthful at the same time. A tip of my hat to you, lords…

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 1:58 pm Grim

      why does it have to be a 4/1 prank? it’s just fucking flat out true

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 3:28 pm Big Game Hunter

        Well, given the timing and the gifs… but hey, I agree there’s plenty truth in there. I’d bet a big reason why women seem to get off so much on post-fight sex is this rape fantasy aspect of it. First conflict/danger, then sex…

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 5:29 am Arbiter

        Grim, practice as you preach. Your knife is sharp and menacing, I presume. No need to use a mask as you go forth on the dark streets, as the women will like it. In fact, why limit oneself to the chilly night? Walk into a high school, grab a student girl and drag her into the bathroom. Since she likes her self ze rape anyways, there is no risk involved. You can even give her your name and phone number afterward, and tell her to come back for seconds.

        Though she might consider that last part a beta move. She’ll want you to surprise her by jumping out of the bushes when she is on her way home.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 7:37 am Grim

        Perhaps try remedial reading lessons and then read my post again? I don’t know.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 4:06 pm Arbiter

        Aw, Grim. Don’t be like that. You pretend that I can’t read? That’s all you got? Obviously I can read and write just fine, so your “argument” falls very flat. Ouch.

        “why does it have to be a 4/1 prank? it’s just fucking flat out true”

        Speaking of reading and writing, that should be Why, not why. And It’s, not it’s. And “flat-out true”, not flat out true. So who’s the one whose language is failing? Ouch.

        What your statement means, “it’s just fucking flat-out true”, is that women like rape. That’s what I replied to. Saying practice as you preach: go out and rape a woman. You didn’t say some rape is okay but not other forms, so practice as you preach, rape an unknown woman at knifepoint. If your statement is true, then she will like it. Right? Yes or no?

        Odd how pissed you get because I simply tell you to do what you claim women like. Almost as if you were simply posturing.

        So when was the last time you raped a woman, and did she like it? I’m not talking just rough sex. I’m talking actual rape. Go ahead, tell us where and when. If you have done it, and if you are right and she liked it, then giving the specifics won’t get you in trouble, because surely she will only ask for more, not report you. So let’s hear it. And if you haven’t raped a woman yet, when are you going to do it?

        LikeLike


  10. on April 1, 2014 at 2:13 pm ho

    Why give it away? We might’ve humiliated the bitterati once more.

    LikeLike


  11. on April 1, 2014 at 2:13 pm Director

    Ach So!

    The more men jailed for rape the more play for me! Carry on mein Gentlemen!

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 3:56 pm Theodore Logan

      Snitches get stitches while McRapey gets bitches!

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 7:57 pm Tilikum

        best ever

        LikeLike


  12. on April 1, 2014 at 2:37 pm NothingMan00

    Rape-full Fools!

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 3:28 pm whorefinder

      Damn it! That’s brilliant! I should have thought of it.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 8:25 pm NothingMan00

        Would be nice to see it trending on Twitter.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 4:17 pm Theodore Logan

      Raping April!

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 9:59 pm Greg Eliot

        It’s the cruelest month, don’cha know!

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 5:09 pm Theodore Logan

        Yes, the 15th is particularly quite brutal.

        LikeLike


  13. on April 1, 2014 at 3:35 pm Grim

    One thing is true: when a person with an M.D. or PhD degree is a man, he will introduce himself, even in formal videos, as “Mike Smith,” not “Doctor Mike Smith.”

    But 100% of women who have doctorate degrees will refer to themselves, when speaking orally, as “Doctor Helen Smith.”

    Every time.

    More female insecurity. It’s fucking weird. “Hi, I’m Doctor Helen Smith.”

    Okay toots.

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 9:14 pm Rick Derris

      That is because they still feel weird knowing that they were only admitted to medical school because of “diversity”

      LikeLike


  14. on April 1, 2014 at 3:42 pm Love the Hamster

    Proof of this Rape-full Fool’s truth… the “forced” blowjob.

    1. As selfish as it gets.
    2. Raping her throat is not something she’ll admit she wants.
    3. She’s submitting to Alpha on her knees (hamster favorite).
    4. She says no, Alpha doesn’t hear it, plows through (another favorite).
    5. Throat fucking is the definition of insensitve (she can’t say a word, no clitoral stimulation).
    6. Alpha takes control, allows her to regress to the cock-sucking toddler she is (again the sub is really in control, she actually does a lot of work and could bite through your cock, but hamster allows her to blissfully ignore this fact).
    7. Starts with you pushing her to her knees.
    8. Slamming her face (source of her beauty/power) is as aggressive as it gets.

    Straight line to the reptile. Her pussy will drip. Alpha can do no wrong.

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 6:16 pm Anonymous

      I’ve never facefucked a woman and then NOT found her to be dripping wet.

      LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 8:00 pm Tilikum

      this is pure truth boys. listen close.

      LikeLike


  15. on April 1, 2014 at 3:50 pm Troubadour

    You know what April Fool’s Day means, don’t you boys and girls? That’s right! My beloved daughter is officially 17.

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 4:13 pm Carlos Danger

      Congratulations and Happy Birthday. The fun should be starting now.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 4:48 pm Troubadour

        Reading one of the linked articles, he talked about how women are attracted to men who have a lust for violence. I’ve been meeting a lot of girls lately, and haven’t met one yet who didn’t love to hear my plan for how I’m slowly obliterating every last shred of my wife’s happiness. It’s amazing what spin can do.

        “Why don’t you leave?”
        “I can’t afford to leave.”
        “You’re an emo faggot. Next!”

        vs.

        “Why don’t you leave?”
        “I’m leaving. Timing is everything. I want to maximize her suffering and inflict the maximal amount of emotional trauma and torment, and these things take timing and calculation.”
        “Ooooh, tell me more about destroying another woman’s soul!”

        Heh. Life is pretty cool right now.

        [CH: chicks dig unapologetic sadists.]

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 12:47 am Zombie Shane

        Not to put too much of a downer on all of this awesome rape-talk, but shit damn, the poor girl is only 17 and her Mom & Dad are about to get divorced.

        Even though the the Mom doesn’t realize it yet.

        What a wonderful birthday present.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 11:27 am Glengarry

        “So here’s your new daddy, Uncle Whorefinder …”

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 4:44 pm Troubadour

        Cry for the girl for the right reasons. She’s badly screwed up, because she was raised without an authoritative male role model. I was raised to be a mother with a penis, basically, and it took most of the kid’s life for me to work through and past all that, and discover how to be a man. It’s late in the game, and a lot of damage has already been done. She’s a militant feminist lesbian who believes in forced emasculation for all males. “There are other ways to get DNA. The penis is an insult that should not be suffered.”

        It’s not too late to correct that attitude, and the correction is working reasonably well so far, but it’s a lot of damage to reverse, and some of it has probably taken a permanent set by now. I accept responsibility, but not culpability. I had no idea I was fucking it all up until quite recently. I’m pissed at a lot of people who filled my head with bullshit over the years, but it is what it is.

        As to divorce, I’m at a stage in life where I’m doing what I want instead of what is practical, and that is really working out for me. Getting divorced is what I want, and staying married is practical, so I should get divorced. It’s REALLY not practical though, to a much larger extent than, say, buying a new truck.

        Being the married guy with unapologetically sadistic plans for fucking his wife over is really working out for me so far. Why change it up? Being driven and having that plan and those options is worth far more than actually being single would be.

        LikeLike


  16. on April 1, 2014 at 3:50 pm Scray

    If you get scratched so hard during that the scratch marks leave scars….this is a DHV, right? More importantly……how do you make it work for you? You think wearing short sleeves and just hoping a girl you’re out with brings up the scars is good enough? Then you can just answer truthfully (with a smirk so she isn’t sure if you’re serious).

    LikeLike


  17. on April 1, 2014 at 3:54 pm Betabetabeta

    I don’t know what’s more predictable: a female’s actions or the CH “alphas” who never cease to jump at the opportunity to comment on this blog. At least they’re all following and doing what you want them to do, CH. Your empire will crumble someday though, as do all.

    [CH: The jelly is strong in this one.]

    LikeLike


  18. on April 1, 2014 at 4:16 pm Newbie

    How does a gif work?

    [CH: you just put your tits together and… boat.]

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 4:05 am Newbie

      Very productive CH…

      By the way… at least next time write something that I can understand … (sorry, not native english speaker, specially not american english)

      LikeLike


  19. on April 1, 2014 at 4:19 pm little spoon

    It just depends on who does it. Also, how they act towards you otherwise is a big factor.

    I would be fine if an attractive man had non consensual sex with me but he would have to want to be my boyfriend afterwards. Like love me and keep me forever.

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 4:35 pm Theodore Logan

      AAAAAAAArrrgh! Klingon rape!

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 6:06 pm little spoon

        No way, man. I don’t want my kids to get that fucked up shit on their heads.

        Can we make this like Bruce Springsteen circa 1984 rape? Well, I was a one year old in 1984, but like make it go back in time so that I am the same age as now and Springsteen is like Dancing in the Dark form. Yeah, right there- that’s perfect.

        Ok, whorefinder, this is your cue to comment.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 3:32 pm Theodore Logan

        My bad, I meant cling on rape, as in you clinging on to the poor bastard who forces himself on you for the rest of his life. Realistically, one of Thwack’s many brothers or any other such criminally minded individual would be happy to oblige you in half of your fantasy. That falling in love with you and wanting to keep you forever nonsense ain’t never gonna happen… unless you meet the right kind of crazy.

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 6:38 pm BlackPoisonSoul

      You would be fine if an attractive man raped you, yet not an unattractive man.

      You have the desire to be raped by an attractive man and you would become his willing post-rape-slut, just so long as he said that he wanted to be your boyfriend afterwards. He just has to lie to you when saying that he loves you and wants to keep you forever.

      Sounds good.

      I can smell the smoking hamstershit rationalisation from here.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 7:21 pm little spoon

        “I can smell the smoking hamstershit rationalisation from here.”

        There is no rationalization involved. It is a fantasy. Nothing is more free from rationalization.

        “” He just has to lie to you when saying that he loves you and wants to keep you forever.”

        He doesn’t have to say anything. He just has to feel in his heart that he loves me so much. That’s how my fantasy is, and if it came true, it would be ok with me.

        I don’t care at all for the idea of an intruder coming into my home and raping me. That does nothing for me. Never once fantasized about such a thing. I like the idea where an attractive guy rapes me and keeps me and then we get married and we are together forever.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 4:44 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        Read between the lines boys.

        She wants to be taken by someone who’ll devour her for his pleasure because he LOVES her so much. Because he loves HER so much.

        Narcissism is inherent in female seduction.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 5:42 am little spoon

        Wanting to be loved is not narcissism.

        [CH: All desire contains an element of narcissism.]

        LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 10:44 pm Survivorman

        Truth ^

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 10:13 pm FuriousFerret

      How deep does the rabbit hole go with this chick?

      She just admitted a couple days that she had an abortion as a mistress to a married washed up rock star who she hates but won’t leave.

      Femx, have you though about being an alcoholic? That might be a good career path for you.

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 5:44 am little spoon

        “Femx, have you though about being an alcoholic? That might be a good career path for you.”

        You could read more of my blog for the answer to that.

        “who she hates but won’t leave. ”

        No, I love him. Just don’t enjoy sex with him.

        LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 2:58 am Rman

      Key word: “Afterwards”

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 6:55 am little spoon

        Yes. That is the key word.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 11:46 am Charlie Don't Surf

        Bring the Aish movies … for afterwards … you minx.

        LikeLike


  20. on April 1, 2014 at 4:33 pm betterthantheoriginalwally

    off topic but funny http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/tv/television-presenter-rachel-smalley-apologises-after-calling-new-zealand-women-heifers-and-a-bunch-of-lardos-while-on-air/story-e6frfmyi-1226872014677

    LikeLike


  21. on April 1, 2014 at 6:00 pm thrust

    Banged a tight big titty’d 18yr couple nights back (im 27).

    Weird thing was it was a mindfuck all the way through. Instead of helping me ease the ‘pain’ of my breakup (2 weeks post) at some points of the fucking I was imagining her.

    After the fact she threw on a hoodie and sweats of mine – something my ex used to always do – fucking girl looked just like her from behind. She stayed the night and slept the same as the ex did.

    I have 2 others on the go and counting for the next few weeks. Problem is, fucking the 18yr old made me want my ex back in massive ways. Just for a fuck.

    I texted the ex today after 2 weeks no contact after I ended it: “lol watching sound of music w ______ (daughter). reminded me of you”

    ex: “that’s adorable thrust, love hearing that.”

    to me, that came of as indifference – which means I’m sol for a post fucking.

    Thoughts?

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 6:25 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

      If your ex is the mother of your daughter, then you should keep the ol’ broad in your life for the sake of your daughter’s mental well-being. Even if you ain’t tappin’ that ass anymore, you should at least be civil so your daughter doesn’t have to suffer any more of her parents’ drama.

      I don’t know the specifics of your past relationship with your ex, but generally, if it didn’t work out the first time, then it’s not gonna work out the second time around. There’s just too much bad blood boiling beneath the surface for the two of you to see each one another with fresh eyes. At some point, something seemingly innocuous will trigger a bad memory or incident between the two of you, and inevitably drive both of you further apart.

      On the other hand, your buxom, ‘lil 18-year old sounds like she embodies all the *positive* qualities of your ex, without all that crippling emotional baggage. She’s probably younger, hotter, and tighter, too. You’re hung up on your ex because she meant something more to you than the 18-year old. But who’s to say that can’t change? Be the captain of her ship and guide this new girl to become “Ex. 2.0” — new and improved, without the ball-busting bugs found in the first version. Bottom line: leftovers never taste as good as fresh food, so don’t try to reheat old pussy with feeler texts.

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 6:34 pm thrust

        The ex isn’t the mother. Yes, the 18yr has a hotter bod, bigger tits, tighter pussy..but facially my ex is a 9.5 – and right there is fucking with me/making me go through a massive withdrawal phase these past 48 hrs.

        Me texting her, and from the POV that I did it, was IMO the best way to curb my withdrawal.

        My goal obviously is to find a hotter girl than the ex. I’ve done this throughout my life – but facially, this will be very fucking difficult for me. It’s almost as if fucking the 18yr old set me back because there would have been no way I would have initiated contact today.

        Fucking brain chemicals

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 6:37 am Tilikum

        you gotta try and scramble those chemicals and strip em out as quickly as possible and any contact is counter productive..

        dont laugh but on the three occasions i lost one i wanted to keep, (all 9.5)’s
        i kinda turned inward and focused on highly enlightening and spiritual endeavors. ram dass, lao tsu, confucious, machiavelli etc.

        it def blunts the chemical reward circuit being broken, and depending on how crazy deep you and her vibed, can give you important perspective on the next one without the self destructive after affects of the dumb shit guys usually do like dive into a bottle.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 5:44 am Arbiter

        Hair Slicked Back- Don’t you know that only betas have daughters? That only a beta would (like Mystery in that awful picture) push his daughter’s trolley for even a second, or do something lowly like help put on her shoes, or talk to her? In fact, having children, or a long-term relationship, is so beta. A true alpha only bangs, never bucks, which is all that marriage is.

        On the other hand, going on a string of dates is beta too, since you would have to have a conversation where you act friendly toward a girl and even smile at her. Likewise, foreplay, kissing, carressing, or any part of sex that isn’t just the ol’ in and out just reeks of beta.

        Yes, the only true alpha behavior is to go online and denounce women as sluts in PUA blogs. That is the peak state. Once you have achieved it, you can also enjoy the chance to denounce anyone below you as lacking in ideological purity, and therefore being beta.

        If you think I’m joking, I have seen examples of all these statements. But never from the big bloggers though, only from commenters and forum dwellers.

        LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 6:30 am Amy

      That’s indifference, thrust. Sorry. You’re in no shape to get together with her anyway. Go back to no contact and meeting other girls. You think it set you back but it sounds like it’s just the post-breakup “I don’t like her because she isn’t x” phase. Time heals.

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 10:28 am thrust

        My only hope is she doesn’t assume she just ‘won’ the break-up by me caving and texting. But if she’s indifferent, then I guess it doesn’t matter.

        LikeLike


  22. on April 1, 2014 at 6:20 pm AlphaBeta

    Analysis: is the guy in this story alpha or beta? (Trigger [lol] warning: long feminist diatribe) http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2014/3/31/Harvard-sexual-assault/#.UznKm08h9S4.facebook

    LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 7:52 pm Gro Haila

      Oh, well. Probably a “creep” 🙄

      What an entitled skank!

      LikeLike


      • on April 1, 2014 at 7:55 pm Gro Haila

        Is there any mention of parents?

        LikeLike


    • on April 1, 2014 at 9:19 pm Rick Derris

      I say he is Beta.

      If the guy was one of the Winklevoss twins she would be telling all her friends about the encounter. I am guessing the guy was more like Fuckerberg, hence her article.

      LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 5:40 am cynthia

      Guys, if a woman is crying and telling you no, you should stop…(unless that’s been arranged in advance)

      More pertinent question, though. Why didn’t she go to the police? Why do schools reserve the right to investigate this shit at all?

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 6:47 am Tilikum

        “More pertinent question, though. Why didn’t she go to the police? Why do schools reserve the right to investigate this shit at all?”

        cause bitches lie. a lot, and cops and administrators know it. so they make deals to avoid costly investigations that the police are compelled to undertake by their due diligence imperative, and the schools run the first set of filters to avoid stupid shit from child-women like this.

        if you read this bullshit, she says that he bit her too hard, not the she didn’t want him to bite her. and the “pressured” line is old as fuck.

        que the pic of the “raped” girl in public with the huge smile…..you ladies arent fighting us guys, you are fighting yourselves.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 6:51 pm Amy

        I agree about leaving it to the police, but today’s universities are too PC to not have “boards” and “committees” to investigate all manner of hurt feelings. The fact that Harvard didn’t even credit her story enough to give her any touchy feely coddling tells you how crazy she must be. I feel sorry for her, she obviously has major issues.

        It amazes me that she won’t take any responsibility at all for being drunk, going to his room, and “obeying” what he was asking her to do. I had something 10x more aggressive happen to me in college and I had no problem acknowledging what role my bad judgment played in the situation. Sometimes both people are at fault.

        LikeLike


  23. on April 1, 2014 at 6:26 pm Reservoir Tip

    Was hanging out at school the other day when I noticed some Indian-looking guy trying to pick up a girl who also looked Indian. He was shooting a little bit of game at her, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he read around on PUA sites and whatnot.

    He went for the date close, inviting her for ice cream, but she was going cold, playing the whole, “oh… How about you give me YOUR number and I’ll text you” game after he asked for hers, so I chipped in, “hey. Go get ice cream with the guy. It’s not like he’s trying to get you pregnant.”

    He got the number, gave me a handshake and left. Then the girl tried flirting with me! Stuck around like an annoying fly until I told her I had to go to class. But I was begging her hard for being so creeped out by a guy just trying to talk to her, so I guess she couldn’t resist.

    LikeLike


  24. on April 1, 2014 at 7:59 pm Dog king

    When I was a teenager I began to occasionally rape my 19 year old girlfriend. Choking, light bondage, etc. Never asked for consent either just fully committed whenever I was horny enough. After a while fucking like a deathrow rapist can mess with your head so watch out. I can’t really get off unless I completely objectify the woman.

    LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 2:01 am LD

      women ARE meat machines so objectify away.

      LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2014 at 6:08 am Zombie Shane

        Attitudes like this have a real strong tendency to result in a Total Fertility Rate of 0.0.

        Which does wonders for the future of Western Civilization.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2014 at 2:42 pm ching chong

        Nigga fucking white women.

        LikeLike


  25. on April 1, 2014 at 8:34 pm Libertardian

    The wages of beta is death.

    http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/27/justice/montana-newlywed-sentenced/index.html?hpt=us_t5

    “(CNN) — Less than nine months after she shoved her husband off a steep cliff just days into their marriage, a federal judge sentenced Jordan Linn Graham to 30 years in prison Thursday.

    Graham, 22, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder in December, admitting to luring her new husband, Cody Johnson, to Glacier National Park and pushing him off a cliff.

    “After providing several false statements to law enforcement officers and impeding the investigation by providing false information, Graham ultimately admitted pushing Cody from behind with both hands,” prosecutors said in a statement Thursday.

    …

    The sentencing comes months after Graham’s surprise guilty plea in the middle of the high-profile murder trial.

    “It was a reckless act,” Graham told the judge in December. “I just pushed.”

    …

    When the judge first asked what happened the day her husband was killed, Graham responded, “I wasn’t thinking of where we were.”

    Then she spoke of a deadly argument at the park and how she had misgivings about the marriage.

    “I wasn’t really happy,” she said.”

    LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 6:51 am Tilikum

      looking at her pic, hes better off than 10 years of marriage to that beast and then a crippling divorce.

      woof.

      LikeLike


  26. on April 1, 2014 at 9:49 pm The Spirit Within

    OT

    Here’s Hugo Schwyzer, in bizarre, lurid detail.

    http://www.lamag.com/features/2014/03/26/the-hugo-problem

    Narcissistic, bipolar, borderline personality disorder. A clusterfuck of DSM-V bad-boy predilections. Seduces tons of young poosy.

    AND a “feminist”.

    Nah.

    [CH: I called this guy out before anyone else did.]

    LikeLike


  27. on April 1, 2014 at 9:51 pm Jordan Belfort

    I figured you guys might like this:

    The applications here are obvious.

    LikeLike


  28. on April 1, 2014 at 10:22 pm El Diablo

    “I thank god that I was born Greek & not Barbarian, free man & not slave, man & not woman, but above all, I was born in the age of Socrates”

    Plato

    LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 6:01 am Arbiter

      While women may not be too keen on outright rape, they do admire the conqueror and side with the winner, no matter what they say.

      Might is Right, by Ragnar Redbeard

      Might was right when Caesar bled
      Upon the stones of Rome
      Might was right when Genghis led
      His hordes o’er Danube’s foam
      And might was right when German troops
      Poured down through Paris way
      It’s the gospel of the ancient world
      And the logic of today

      Behind all kings and presidents
      All government and law
      Are army corps and cannoneers
      To hold the world in awe
      And sword-strong races own the earth
      And ride the conqueror’s car
      For liberty has never been won
      Except by deeds of war

      What are the lords of hoarded gold
      The silent Semite rings?
      What are the plunder pirates
      High pontiffs, priests and kings?
      What are they, but bold masterminds
      Best fitted for the fray, who comprehend
      And vanquish by the logic of today

      Cain’s knotted club is scepter still
      The “Right of Man” is fraud
      Christ’s ethics are for creeping things
      True manhood smiles at “God”
      For might is right when empires sink
      In storms of steel and flame
      And it is right when weakling breeds
      Are hunted down like game

      Then what’s the use of dreaming dreams
      That each shall get his own?
      By forceless votes of meek-eyed thralls
      Who blindly sweat and moan?
      A pox is on their cankered brains
      Their very bones decay
      Go! Trace your fate in the iron game
      Is the logic of today

      The strong must ever rule the weak
      Is grim primordial law
      On earth’s broad racial threshing floor
      The meek are beaten straw
      Then ride to power o’er foemen’s necks
      Let nothing bar your way
      If you are fit you’ll rule and reign
      Is the logic of today

      You must prove you’re right by deeds of might
      Of splendor and reknown
      If need be, march through flames of hell
      To dash opponents down
      If need be die on scaffold high
      In the morning’s misty grey
      For liberty or death is still the logic of today

      Might was right when Gideon led
      The Chosen tribes of old
      And it was right when Titus burnt
      Their temple roofed with gold
      And might was right from Bunker’s hill
      To far Manilla bay
      By land and flood it’s writ in blood
      The gospel of today

      Put not your trust in princes
      Is a saying old and true
      Put not your hope in governments
      Translateth it anew
      All books of law and golden rules
      Are fashioned to betray
      The survival of the strongest
      Is the gospel of today

      Might was right when Carthage flames
      Lit up the punic foam
      And when the naked steel of Gaul
      Weighed down the spoils of Rome
      And might was right when Richmond fell
      And at Thermopylae
      It’s the logic of the ancient world
      And the gospel of today

      When pendant suns in millions swing
      Around this whirling earth
      It’s might, it’s force that holds the brakes
      And steers through death and birth
      Force governs all organic life
      Inspires right and wrong
      It’s nature’s plan to weed out man
      And test who are the strong!

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 6:32 am Gro Haila

        For when I am weak, then I am strong.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 7:06 am thwack

        When you see me on the ropes you think Im doin bad.

        LikeLike


  29. on April 1, 2014 at 10:38 pm Hair Slicked Back With Swag So Fresh

    Speaking of enjoying it:

    http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/study-reveals-female-rape-victims-enjoyed-the-experience/

    Two bangin’ chimps, one horny cunt:

    http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/fetishes-i-dont-get/201101/sex-researchers-rethink-female-sexuality

    LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 3:28 pm pulsotic

      The first link is to a HOAX article written to bait feminists.

      LikeLike


  30. on April 2, 2014 at 1:59 am LD

    is number 4 heather matarazzo & gerrit graham in now and again?

    LikeLike


  31. on April 2, 2014 at 2:58 am Mark Minter

    I hope this goes into moderation so you see it. I include a link to an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The article is entitled, “Human origins and the transition from promiscuity
    to pair-bonding”. It is an extremely complicated analysis based on some standard formulas from economics about utility and analyzes the relationships between “male fighting”, mate guarding, and production. I am interested in getting your take on what it says. It makes a statement that a pair bonding model based on provisioning begins where the lowest status males in the group offer provisioning and if monogamous pairs become the norm then female faithfulness is high. And this faithfulness causes provisioning as the basis of pair bonding to then move up the hierarchy of males as less effort is spent on fighting and mate guarding.

    http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/05/21/1200717109.full.pdf+html

    I am sure you can derive some “Science once again supports/copies CH” sorts of postings from this article. And I don’t say that in jest but rather I say it seriously. The pdf portion has a menu at the top which offers a “download” option which will pull a pdf copy into your download directory. I recommend doing so as it will require a few readings to fully understand and comprehend the equations and the set of conclusions derived from them.

    [CH: Makes sense.]

    LikeLike


  32. on April 2, 2014 at 5:16 am PDA

    Completely off point, but I haven’t seen this anywhere on the site, so I’d really like to know what CH thinks about Lone Wolf types, as opposed to alphas and betas.

    I’m a lone wolf. I can’t be buggered to hang around big groups of males, and have no interest in following or leading. I don’t give a fuck about social niceties or small talk. But I have a pretty good success rate when it comes to picking up women at bars and clubs. I am above average looking (maybe an 8 when fit), and generally if a girl shows interest in me I can close it the same night.

    I’ll be honest and say that all of my PUs are 6-8s, but I have had 9s-10s hit on me a few times (always when in a LTR!). I do have a reason for this though because I have overdosed on redpill and find most 9s-10s are too heavily socialized into consensus reality for me to even have a conversation with them, which makes it difficult to close – my engine stalls in 1st gear so I run out of shit to say.

    I have had a few run-ins with alpha types who seem to instinctively dislike me, but generally I don’t give a fuck what people think about me. I go out alone sometimes and have had no issues with that. I have had women approach me and tell me I have strong sexual magnetism a few times, even though I don’t feel particularly magnetic.

    This doesn’t fit neatly into the alphabet, but there must be other guys like me out there. Not everyone getting pussy is the suave everyman. Some girls also like the mysterious, quiet outsider – it’s sure as fuck the easiest way to stand out without trying.

    LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 6:08 am Churro

      It’s called being Sigma male. The best type of man there is.

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 9:21 am PDA

        Ah.. I found a link on CH to it now. Thanks for the heads up.

        LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 6:52 am Tilikum

      hello, brother.

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 9:44 am PDA

        I just read the CH definition of Sigma at:https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/10/18/the-rise-of-the-renegade-alpha/

        It read like an alpha/greater beta’s response to how he feels about sigma males – uncomfortable. They don’t play by the rules. I guess this is partly because the whole game scene is partly about getting social validation and approval for picking up poon while I quite honestly don’t give a fuck.

        [CH: This is a classic trope of anti-PUA haters. Most womanizers get into the game for sex and love, not for bragging rights, a few douchey exceptions to the contrary notwithstanding.]

        In fact I have turned down direct offers to fuck about 10 times in my life with reasonably attractive women. Reason being I wouldn’t get much out of sticking it into the smarmy muff of a meathead.

        [Why do you hate women?]

        To me a man who falls for every pussy dangled in front of him is the ultimate slave of pussy, which in turn makes him the ultimate slave of women, and the ultimate, greatest beta of them all.

        [Or maybe he just likes fucking hot babes.

        ps Do you know what men who refuse to dance to women’s attractiveness criteria are called? Eunuchs.]

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 12:23 pm Scray

        whatever, nigga. you sound gay.

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 3:48 pm Arbiter

        “To me a man who falls for every pussy dangled in front of him is the ultimate slave of pussy, which in turn makes him the ultimate slave of women”

        Strawman. Who has ever said “every”? I doubt there is even a single man who would sleep with “every” possible woman.

        And even if it was so, how would that make him a “slave”? It doesn’t. A slave is someone who is forced to give up part of the fruits of his labor to someone else. You want to call a man who sleeps with women something negative and belittling, but the word you choose doesn’t apply.

        LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 12:13 pm PDA

      Thanks for replying CH. I wasn’t trying to troll you.

      Let me tell you a true story.

      I did bar work in my 20s for a year, working at a club. There was a guy there who was an undisputed alpha. This guy screwed girls almost every night he went out. I remember he once drove a girl he’d met and fucked the night before’s car to work without asking her, and then made her catch a taxi to pick up the keys.

      My relationship with this guy was fraught. At first he tried to befriend me, and I was nudged towards being an admirer of his and ‘fitting in’. I thought the guy was dumb and pretty much didn’t give a fuck. Just did my own thing. At night when they’d go out after work to drink, I’d go home and read books on Zen buddhism. By and by this guy started to hate me, and we started having confrontations that got quite nasty. I never started anything, but the guy had a real issue with me. I remember standing one night by a bar fridge restraining myself from breaking a bottle over his head.

      To cut a long story short, one night I did actually go out with them to a bar after having a few too many shooters during a shift. I was standing around not feeling the vibe when a girl approaches me out the blue and tells me I have the most intense sexual energy about me. I go with it, call a taxi, go home and fuck her (the next morning I tell my ex-girlfriend what happened, she gets straight in her car, comes over and fucks me).

      At work a day later I find out that this girl had been fucking the alpha for a while. I’d honestly had no clue, I had never seen her before. I didn’t feel like fucking her again (my ex-gf was making up for lost time), but we stayed in touch. One day I asked her if she knew what they guy’s problem with me was. She told me that he’d said to her couldn’t figure me out – he never knew what my motives were or what I was thinking, and when I looked him in the eyes he felt like I could see right through him.

      After that incident the guy never fucked around with me again, ever. We weren’t friends, but there were no further incidents. This to me represents what these guys are calling a sigma male. I never joined in the social rituals that these guys had, I wasn’t part of their hierarchy, but the girl the alpha fucked on the side came to me for sex.

      To respond to you:

      Yeah, I understand that guys like screwing ‘hot babes’, as do I. But honestly, I would take no pleasure in fucking a ‘hot babe’ who is also piece of shit as a human being. Half of the PUA/neo-reaction blogs are focused on what soulless, spiritually shrivelled creatures women are turning into. So my question to me would be why would you want to stick your dick in that? You’re fucking an attractive sheep. I won’t grudge you your pleasures, but do see it for what it is. I find stupid, superficial women unattractive. Every one I have met has a mental age of 10, is ridiculously self-obsessed and narcissistic and is so disgusting blue-pilled and conformist that I find it offensive. There must be beauties out there who are like that, but I haven’t met one yet – I find 7s and 8s have sometimes developed themselves a bit more.

      So no, I don’t hate women. I hate stupid conformists of both genders.

      Maybe being able to discriminate and turn that kind of woman down (which I have done twice to direct offers for sex) is what differentiates a sigma from an alpha.

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 3:35 pm pulsotic

        What was your question

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 3:54 pm Arbiter

        Half of the PUA/neo-reaction blogs are focused on what soulless, spiritually shrivelled creatures women are turning into. So my question to me would be why would you want to stick your dick in that?

        But what does this have to do with the link you posted about CH’s and Vox’s definition of a sigma? A sigma is not someone who sleeps with every possible woman. It is, in that definition, actually a leftist antisocial guy who uses the media propaganda that favors leftist “rebels” in order to get women:

        “So the Renegade Alpha, or Sigma Male in Vox’s terminology, excels at exploiting cratering cultures and the tender, psychologically scarred minds that inhabit them. Societal collapse is his serendipity. The cri de coeur of broken souls his symphony.”

        LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 4:11 pm Arbiter

        Addendum: PDA, I think you may have latched on to CH’s mention of Casanova in his sigma article. But Casanova wouldn’t sleep with every woman either.

        Now, when it comes to the question of whether there are women a man wouldn’t sleep with even if they were attractive, I think anyone who has met a truly repulsive but still attractive woman would agree. It takes a lot for an attractive woman to make men not want to have sex with her, but some manage to do it.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2014 at 3:07 am PDA

        Arbiter.. I had to lol when you said ‘leftist’. Just to clarify I am not leftist. Have you tried to say anything remotely ‘right wing’ in polite company recently? Fashionably SWPL is where it’s at. Me I like guns, I like independence, I grow some of my own food, I’m a race realist and a political formalist. There might be some renegade 10s out there who would like that, but like I said, in my experience those women are very highly socialized into consensus reality – their market value and survival depend on it. When you internalize enough shit you become that shit. I don’t feel that way about Latin American women or Eastern Europeans – so may head over their to shed some bias sometime.

        It’s not that I wouldn’t want to fuck many Western 10s from a purely aesthetic point of view, it’s that the bump that is their absence of personality is actually just to big. It’s like trying to eat a great looking piece of pizza that smells like horseshit. One part of you says yes, another no.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2014 at 2:06 am Tilikum

        you sound mad that the vast majority of people in general are basic, and that a woman’s solopsistic tendencies point her to a self-centered existence. i can understand that.

        but like the wacked out tradcons here and elsewhere in the sphere, it helps to remember that there is no inherent morality in nature and that reproductive survival is in fact the only game we play. the idea of right and wrong, good and bad,slutty and chast, in these matters….is uniquely human and owes to enhanced executive functions that are given to us by barely enough extra brain matter to fill a toothpaste tube.

        you just hate people, and more importantly, yourself.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2014 at 3:19 am PDA

        Tilikum. I don’t hate people or myself. I think I may be starting to strongly dislike Western women, but mainly due to the fact that they seem to be the vanguard of assimilation of leftarded ideology, which makes them, in my experience, insufferable at best and dangerous at worst. There is nothing ‘matural’ about the current status quo – it is an aberration.

        Do you think your ‘reproductive survival’ is served by some borderline bitch, with wrong ideas about everything bringing your kids up to be anti-CIS gender neutral career narcissists, funded with your alimony bux? Or the same woman aborting your progeny before you even get there?

        Any semen pumped into the painted dummies lining the halls of the sinking ship of Western civilization might as well be going into your toilet.

        Anyway it seems you have assimilated one of the most basic sermons preached by the cathedral, a mechanistic interpretation of biology which is then used to generalize the functioning of the entire universe. No good, no bad, just good little plebs building nothing and instead pressing the dopamine lever and coming up with a worldview to rationalize their slavery to a neurotransmitter.

        I’d say good is that which elevates, ennobles, and builds. Bad is that which degenerates, drags down and destroys. But that’s just me being a tradcon.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2014 at 11:22 am Tilikum

        the most adaptive of the species is not the strongest but the most adaptable.

        you either adapt or perish, but thats on you.

        Confucious said that when the archer misses the bullseye, he cant blame the target, the arrow, or the bow, that he must reflect on himself and himself wholly.

        your feelings about the society are irrelevant, only what you DO next.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2014 at 11:22 am Tilikum

        *meant to say the most prolific of the species

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2014 at 1:57 pm PDA

        Oh, I am planning to adapt. I see the necessity of having good looking kids, but if I am going to be hitched to that wagon I want to make sure it is worth it. There are some corners of the globe where the feminazi poison has not gone too deep, and to these corners I plan to go – one day – to sow my seed. But fuck me if I am going to cowtow to the horror that is the western Womyn.

        LikeLike


  33. on April 2, 2014 at 6:54 am walawala

    Putting this into practice means looking into a girl’s eyes you’re gaming and when you start talking about banging her whisper: “rough…not painful…”

    LikeLike


  34. on April 2, 2014 at 7:28 am Just Saying

    Women love the entire – “but it wasn’t my fault” thing. So they fantasize about having no power and being used. It’s always there – you just have to know when and where to invoke it. Had one not that long ago that was into the whole choking thing to enhance orgasms. So I choke her well banging her to the point she passes out, after checking her pulse to be sure she was okay, I curled up and went to sleep. The next morning I wake up to the smell of eggs and bacon – which was interesting since I had beer and pizza in the fridge. She got up and went out to make me breakfast. Ended up spending most of the day with her.Yeah, I’ve hooked up with her a couple of times – she has a BF. (Direct quote: “He is so sensitive it makes me want to puke, but he’s got money and spends it on me.”). Whereas to me she is a piece of ass I enjoy from time to time. And I’ve told her so, “You are a fine piece o’ ass.” That usually gets a little seductive shake from her before she head out.

    She’s a freaky little one, handcuffs, duct-tape, ball-gag, hog-tied – you name it, and she is up for it. I often wonder how she explains away all of the rope burns, and bruises to her boy-friend, but hey as long as she’s available and fun, I’ll hit it.

    Always amazes me that there are so many men out there not using women for what they want to be used for – a f**k toy for your pleasure. But hey, that’s fine with me since it means there are plenty for me to enjoy.

    LikeLike


  35. on April 2, 2014 at 8:59 am Grim

    CH that tree trimmer with a chainsaw embedded in his neck is a beneficiary of male privilege!!!!!

    show me one story about a female who had anything like that happen to her on the job in the history of the world.

    [CH: If she did, there would be endless calls to reform the lumber industry. cf., “fundamental premise”.]

    LikeLike


  36. on April 2, 2014 at 9:41 am Vigilante

    There is a fundamental difference between rape and domination fantasies, especially for women. I read this quote in a book which name I do not remember,
    “Every married woman has a secret desire to be raped, by a friend of course”

    [CH: Unfortunately, that is not what the studies show. “Aversive” erotic rape — i.e. getting raped against one’s will by a stranger — is very common among women. If you have a problem with this, take it up with your fellow women.]

    Womens sexuality is complex, and there is vital difference between domination and rape, it has been explained in a scientific journal that i sadly do not know the name of, but a little googling and anyone can find this information. (many) Women want to be dominated, not raped. Or more eloquently, raped on their terms.

    [Same difference. Anyhow, I doubt there’s a feminist who’d be on board with the “raped on her terms” line in the sand.]

    In a separate point, there is a big difference between being raped by a good-looking alphamale and a basementdwelling redneck, even though both are “assholes” being “bad boys”.

    [Stop trolling.]

    This is non-PC on a whole new level for Chateu really, and even I am starting to become bewildered. What was the point of this post really? To argue for rape? To incline that many women have sexual biases for rape? Everyone knows this who isn’t an idiotic femnazi.

    [The point of the post is crisis and observation. And you have failed.]

    LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 10:34 am Greg Eliot

      Womens sexuality is complex…

      Is that what you crazy kids are calling it nowadays… complex?

      I’ll have to check Roget’s again… I don’t recall

      when unchecked, depraved to the point of batshit looney in all imaginable (and some unimaginable) self-loathing, burn-down-the-entire-planet, conveniently rationalized to the point of where black equals white, hamster-turbo-spun ways

      as being listed under complex.

      Funny how words are chosen… complex savors of a connotation of intelligence and profundity in re design.

      Then again, I suppose a neo-techno Rube Goldberg machine with its wires crossed and sparking worse than a Tesla coil knocked into a tank of piranhas might be described as (ahem) complex.

      LikeLike


      • on April 2, 2014 at 1:22 pm Grim

        It’s complicated.

        LikeLike


      • on April 3, 2014 at 12:10 am Subway Masturbator

        That was a nice rant Greg.

        LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 11:32 am Gro Haila

      “Women want to be dominated, not raped. Or more eloquently, raped on their terms.”

      And if the rapist is not rape-y enough,

      … or worse, as resident snowflake RD kindly shared with us.

      LikeLike


  37. on April 2, 2014 at 11:00 am Dimitri802

    At the risk of accidentally encouraging some fool here to engage in _criminally_ stupid behavior, I offer the following link — from a site about what amounts to a form of Marriage Game without ever labeling itself as such:

    http://www.takeninhand.com/rape.rape.fantasy.being.taken.being.ravished

    WARNING: This is a dangerous tool for grown-ups ONLY. I have never used it myself and mention it here only because of its obvious relevance to the present discussion.

    LikeLike


  38. on April 2, 2014 at 11:38 am Glengarry

    In a patriarchal society all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent. (Andrea Dworkin)

    LikeLike


    • on April 2, 2014 at 2:11 pm Gro Haila

      Colectivism at its finest. Benito and Ilich would be proud.

      LikeLike


  39. on April 4, 2014 at 2:12 am 8 Facts From An Esteemed Sexologist | Truth and...

    […] 1. Girls love selfish badboys. 2. Nonconsensual erotic rape fantasies are more common among women than previously thought. 3. Girls love dominant men who take what they want. 4. Girls hate men who do as they’re told.  […]

    LikeLike


  40. on April 8, 2014 at 11:02 pm Lightning Round -2014/04/09 | Free Northerner

    […] 8 politically incorrect facts on sex. […]

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Carlos Danger on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Carlos Danger on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Publius on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Greg Eliot on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    baked georgia on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • How To Get A Girl To Send Nudes Of Herself
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: