Perspicacious and numerate commenter “St” writes in response to this post about Shakespeare having his male characters utter fewer words than their romantic female counterparts,
CH,
I hope you realize that 101/155 = 65.1%
Which is disturbingly close (1.6%) to the 2/3 male-to-female text communication ratio you advise.
If that’s not another exogenous vindication of Chateau principles, I don’t know what is.
“St” is referring to CH’s Poon Commandment V:
V. Adhere to the golden ratio
Give your woman 2/3 of everything she gives you. For every three calls or texts, give her two back. Three declarations of love earn two in return. Three gifts; two nights out. Give her two displays of affection and stop until she has answered with three more. When she speaks, you reply with fewer words. When she emotes, you emote less. The idea behind the golden ratio is twofold — it establishes your greater value by making her chase you, and it demonstrates that you have the self-restraint to avoid getting swept up in her personal dramas. Refraining from reciprocating everything she does for you in equal measure instills in her the proper attitude of belief in your higher status. In her deepest loins it is what she truly wants.
It appears that CH, knowingly or unwittingly ;), stumbled upon a deep and abiding truth about sex, love and the erotic nature of women that was known to the literary greats of the distant past.
Heartiste and Shakespeare… truly, madly, deeply in ❤️!
[…] Shakespeare Vindicates Chateau Heartiste […]
LikeLike
lozozozozoz DA GBFM LUVZ LUVZ SHAKE-A-SPEARZ!!!!
HEY HEARTISTEZZ HEARTIETES!!! DATSZ WHY WE NEEDS TO BRING SHAKESPEARES BACK!!!
BRAVEHEART (GBFM is William Wallace): You’re so concerned with squabbling (gaming) for the scraps (pre-buttocked, desouledz Dalrockianz womenz) from Longshank’s (Chuchian/Frankfartian) table that you’ve missed your God given right to something better (the schools, universities, and a loyal, virginal wife).
BRAVEHEART (GBFM is William Wallace): You’re so concerned with squabbling (gaming) for the scraps (Dalrockian pre-buttocked, deosuledz womenz) from Longshank’s (Chuchian/Frankfartian) table that you’ve missed your God given right to something better (the schools, universities, and a loyal, virginal, wife).
Wallace (GBFM): We have beaten the English (the manosphere gets more traffic than many well-funded frnkfartian blogs), but they’ll come back because you won’t stand together (too many dalrockian frnkfartians attack the Great Books for Men in favor of gamey game).
MacClannough (DALROCK): What will you do?
Wallace (GBFM): I will invade england (the chruches/universities/publishing houses) and defeat the English (Frankfartians/Churchians) on their own ground with a literary and spiritual renaissance exalting the Great Books and Classics.
MacClannough (DALROCK): Invade? That’s impossible.
Wallace (GBFM): Why? Why is that impossible? You’re so concerned with squabbling for the scraps (gaming the pre-buttocked womenz) from Longshanks’ (Frankfartian schools and churches) table that you’ve missed your god-given right to something better (A literary and spirtual renaissance exalting our birthright–the Great Books for Men, and a truly Holy Wife, loyal to God and Man instead of da bottomz lineszzz debtesz butt gina tinzgzlzozolzozo). There’s a difference between us. You think the people of this country (bloggers of the manosphere) exist to provide you with position (instalanches for teaching men they need Game instead of Moses and Jesus and Homer). I think your position exists to provide those people with freedom (the Truth of teh Great Books for Men that Sets Them Free), and I go to make sure that they have it.
zlzozozo
LikeLike
lzozozozozozoz
http://greatbooksformen.wordpress.com/2014/04/03/braveheart-gbfm-is-william-wallace-youre-so-concerned-with-squabbling-gaming-for-the-scraps-from-longshanks-chuchianfrankfartian-table-that-youve-missed-your-god-given-right-to-something/
BRAVEHEART (GBFM is William Wallace): You’re so concerned with squabbling (gaming) for the scraps (pre-buttocked, desouledz Dalrockianz womenz) from Longshank’s (Chuchian/Frankfartian) table that you’ve missed your God given right to something better (the schools, universities, and a loyal, virginal wife).
lzozozozlzozlzozo omzgzozlzoz
LikeLike
HEY HEARTIETSTETZ! HEATRTIETSES!!!!!
DEY BE READING SHAKESPEAREZ & HOMERZ!!
NOT IN DA DLAROCKAIAN UNIVEIRTSSYEIO DALROCKA’S CHURCH AND UNIVERISTY BUT ON DA BEACHZ!!!
DA GBFM GOIN SURFINZ!! CYA LATERS GATORZ!
LikeLike
Yes John, the Iliad and Odyssey exalt the nobility of Honor.
The very first word of the Iliad is “RAGE.” The “RAGE” of Achilles when his honor is violated and his rightful prize and love is taken from him by his very own commander.
Right here we see Man versus State, as Achilles is the superior warrior, and as he takes all the risks, he ought get the reward. That is the Natural Law of Zeus, for after Achilles Natural Rights are violated and Achilles quits, Zeus sees to it that the Greeks begin to lose, as Zeus’s will was done.
Long before Atlas Shrugged in Rand’s cheap novel, Achilles quit the Greek army.
Homer shows that women who honor their commitments, like Penelope, lead to happy endings. Women who disregard their commitments, like Helen, lead to War.
Achilles quits for the sake of Honor, refuses to return when offered millions times more prizes, arguing that once honor is taken away, mere money/prizes cannot buy it back. He also reasons that all the wealth in the world is not worth him losing his life in an arena where his honor was taken away. When offered honors and awards, Achilles states, “I receive my honor from Zeus, not from corrupt Kings.”
And too Achilles returns to fight for Honor, so as to avenge the death of his friend Patroculus, knowing full well he will die.
Simply put, Achilles is a man who lives and dies not for mere prizes, nor perks, nor tenure, nor titles, nor money, but for honor, and honor alone.
A few hundred years later, Socrates would invoke Achilles while facing death at his own trial. Socrates was offered perks and prizes and life if he would only recant his teachings that “Virtue does not come from money, but money and every lasting good of man derives form virtue.”
But then Socrates asked, “Would Achilles back down from battle is bribed by physical wealth?” Socrates reasoned he would be dishonoring the Great Achilles if he ever recanted his teachings.
And of course Socrates mentored Plato who mentored Aristotle who mentored Copernicus/Newton/Galileo, who gave birth to Western Science and Technology and Freedom, all via the Homeric Honor of Achilles.
In the same way Socrates internalized the physical battle of Achilles and made it a battle for the soul, so too did Jesus inetrnalize the physical battles of Moses, and make it a battle for the soul, for the Kingdom of Ideals.
And in Hamlet, we see the clash of Athens and Jerusalem, as Hamlet is called upon to avenge his Father, only to find his murderous uncle begging for forgiveness beneath a cross. So too do we see Athens and Jerusalem as two pillars of our Liberty and Freedom, which is why Dalrock and his Frankfartian Fellowship must attack, belittle and castigate it.
Wallace (GBFM): We have beaten the English (the manosphere gets more traffic than many well-funded frnkfartian blogs), but they’ll come back because you won’t stand together (too many dalrockian frnkfartians attack the Great Books for Men in favor of gamey game).
MacClannough (DALROCK): What will you do?
Wallace (GBFM): I will invade england (the chruches/universities/publishing houses) and defeat the English (Frankfartians/Churchians) on their own ground with a literary and spiritual renaissance exalting the Great Books and Classics.
MacClannough (DALROCK): Invade? That’s impossible.
Wallace (GBFM): Why? Why is that impossible? You’re so concerned with squabbling for the scraps (gaming the pre-buttocked womenz) from Longshanks’ (Frankfartian schools and churches) table that you’ve missed your god-given right to something better (A literary and spirtual renaissance exalting our birthright–the Great Books for Men, and a truly Holy Wife, loyal to God and Man instead of da bottomz lineszzz debtesz butt gina tinzgzlzozolzozo). There’s a difference between us. You think the people of this country (bloggers of the manosphere) exist to provide you with position (instalanches for teaching men they need Game instead of Moses and Jesus and Homer). I think your position exists to provide those people with freedom (the Truth of teh Great Books for Men that Sets Them Free), and I go to make sure that they have it.
LikeLike
I lovz it when you talksz Braveheart, which is the greatest movie ever made.
(You are a faggot if you disagree.)
LikeLike
DA GBFM IS DA CRAZY IRSHIMANZ
AND HEARTITSTE IS DA WILLIAM WALLACEZ!!!
lzozozozoozozozoz
LikeLike
Wull I get to kell the English?
LikeLike
The Scots are beta.
LikeLike
We are they *right now*, failing to fight back. We are slaves of the “government”-Rothschild/YKW banking complex. This is a free country? lzozlozlzozlzolzzo. Then why does it cost so much to live? I have to earn $10,000/month pre-tax just to break even and rent a 2/2 apartment and so do you, in any mid to major city.
I tried to explain the coming to collapse to my landlord, but it (YKW-bank-financed corporation) doesn’t get it. So I keep having to pay $2,200 every month to rent my $500.00 (gold standard) apartment.
You do, too. Because of inflation, we are slaves. My $150,000 today is less than my dad’s $40,000 was in the 1970s.
LikeLike
Converting $$ into gold is just depressing.
(Goldfinger, 1964)
LikeLike
“The Scots are beta.”
Being descended from Scots-Irish backwoods hillbillies from Tennessee/Kentucky….I suggest you never say such a thing in that area.
LikeLike
We’ll see…they may give the English the boot.
Always bothered me that all those Scotsmen who gave their lives to be free from England were sold out hundreds of years later by a bunch of rich guys without a single drop of blood shed.
Kick ’em out, boys, keep your North Sea oil money, and play the bagpipes.
LikeLike
Even though I’m well past the age of romance I find, by way of belated practice, that the two thirds rule is amazingly perceptive and effective. Deep insight into the human condition.
Had only CH been there when I was young and horny…….(sigh)
LikeLike
> “I hope you realize that 101/155 = 65.1% Which is disturbingly close (1.6%) to the 2/3 male-to-female text communication ratio you advise.”
For the benefit of thwack and Scray, you might want to point out that
2/3 = 66.666666%
Give or take a few repeating decimals here and there.
LikeLike
this fucken nerd….
LikeLike
My first reaction to Zombie’s comment was “of course any moron knows that.” But that shows a deficit in my empathetic capabilities, as is demonstrated by your giving a different reaction.
I failed to put myself in the place of those who haven’t known that fact since the age of 8 and may still not know it.
LikeLike
You failed to realize that people who read about game and focus on 66.6666 repeating of course are nerdos who probably don’t get laid much.
LikeLike
Most African tribes had no numbering system apart from 1, 2 and ‘many’. Needless to say concepts such as addition and subtraction were totally beyond them.
LikeLike
As Krauser tweeted, average men don’t learn game. It takes intellect. Propaganda best calibrates the intellectual. Game recalibrates IQ without creating it. Naturals have no control over how long they remain desirable because they are ignorant and hapless with disruptive change. I wonder if women will become so narcissistic that naturals will fail.
LikeLike
That fucking nerd Shane. He walks in straight lines to get somewhere with minimal effort. When he packs his lunch for the day, he knows to pack one meal not two. When he ties his shoes, he knows he’s done after the second time. Un-fuck-ing-believe-able, that fucking nerd. lol
LikeLike
lol why isnt his bitch driving him somewhere? why isnt his bitch making him lunch? I rest my case, nerd.
LikeLike
yeah not everyone knows or understand what is obvious to some of us
a couple weeks ago I bedded a cute woman the one who wanted me to do her dishes after the fourth date.
She is in her forties ( which is younger than I am ) yet asked me what was 3/4 in percentage.
She really did not know it was 75%, she said “is it 60 or 65 or something like that?”
It is hard for me to imagine how such people can function , she has car payments, apartment rent, credit cards, she has her divorce money invested , yet she does not know 3/4 is 75%
Should people like that really be allowed to vote?
LikeLike
“Should people like that really be allowed to vote?”
Ah – HA! ..and *therein* lies the problem, my Canadian Brother.. !
LikeLike
Well, the point is that Shakespeare was a good writer who knew things intuitively and got to more or less 2/3–nothing wrong with going over or under a percent if it fills the line out nicely.
The dude wasn’t sitting there counting words, he knew what people talked like, and wrote dialogue accordingly, but better.
LikeLike
Golden ratio is actually 1.618
http://vinedragonheartstring.tumblr.com/post/15626411340/mona-lisa-leonardo-da-vinci-located-in-the
LikeLike
DA GBFM PLATINUMZ RATIO LZOZOZ
V. Adhere to da PLATINUMZ ratio
Give your woman 2/17 of everything she gives you. For every 17 calls or texts, give her 2 back. Seventeen declarations of love earn two in return. Seventeen gifts; two nights out. Seventeen blowjobs equals two licks of da clittlzlzozo. Give her two displays of affection and stop until she has answered with seventeen more. When she speaks, you reply with fewer words. When she emotes, you emote less. The idea behind the platinum ratio is seventeenfold— it establishes your greater value by making her chase you, and it demonstrates that you have the self-restraint to avoid getting swept up in her personal dramas. Refraining from reciprocating everything she does for you in equal measure instills in her the proper attitude of belief in your higher status. In her deepest loins it is what she truly wants–your seventeen inch lotsas cockas zlzlzlzozo.
LikeLike
HEY EHATETEITSE HEATRIETSTSEZZ!!!
DALROCKAS SAYS DAT CHIRSTIANZ NEED TO LEARN GAMEZ.
BUT IF I DIDN’TZ GET MY LOSTAS COCKAS IN DA GINAHOLES EVERY NIGZT
WOULD JESUS STILL LUV DA GBFMZ?
I HOPEZ SO, BUT CANNOT TAKE ANY CHANCESZ, SO I GONNA KEEP ON GEETINGS DA LOSTAS PUSYSYSYSYSYSYSZLZOZLZ.
LikeLike
…that’s tightbutthole…..
LikeLike
“The “problem” — from a “good life” perspective — is that our DNA-environment mismatch is necessary for natural selection to work.”
very good observation
LikeLike
the hardest part is how you turn a conversation that is proceeding the opposite of the golden ratio into an “alpha conversation”
There are cases when you you start an SMS or whatsapp conversation in a “beta ratio”, the girl is interested but you can’t even set up a date since the beta way the conversation is going makes her deny any approach
LikeLike
you should be trying to hang out from the second text. Every single text should have you attempting to escalate. problem solved.
LikeLike
It’s not hard if you just decide to do it. Rather than giving long explanations of things, start giving short replies instead. Demand long responses from her.
The mere fact of your being in control of the nature of the conversation will stimulate the juices. But it won’t happen if you don’t assert leadership, roughly if you like..
LikeLike
Also sounds close to the Golden Ratio used in architecture.
LikeLike
“That man that hath a tongue, I say, is no man, if with his tongue he cannot win a woman.”
–WillShak
LikeLike
PETRUCHIO:
What, with my tongue in your tail? Nay, come again,
Good Kate. I am a gentleman.
LikeLike
Depends what he does with that tongue!
LikeLike
Or: What GBFM said….
LikeLike
>I hope you realize that 101/155 = 65.1%
>Which is disturbingly close (1.6%) to the 2/3 male-to-female text communication ratio you advise.
It’s actually 2.3% lower. percentage point (pp) != percent.
LikeLike
going from 100 down to 80 is a 20% decrease
while going from 80 to 100 is a 25 % increase
that same 20 between 80 and 100 is in one case 25% and in the other 20%
ain’t maths fun?
LikeLike
Anybody get a deja vu here?
LikeLike
Heartiste and commentators, I need ADVICE! Ex-gf dumped me a couple months ago.
Out of the blue yesterday, I get a text from her saying “Hey you. . .i’ve been so busy with my two new jobs that I’m sincerely sorry for not getting back to you:( I’m doing well. . .how are you?”
I want her back. She’s LTR/marriage material and it F-ed me up when she dumped me because of bullshit. How do I play this?
LikeLike
Forget her. Fuck random chick.
LikeLike
Exactly. Forget her – She’s not coming back – don’t fool yourself. The text was obligatory beta bait. Any response strokes her ego – and she wants nothing more than to hear how f-ed up you’ve been. The best response is no response – complete radio silence – dead air ……. Next.
LikeLike
It’s best if you have a new gf going into whatever you do next with her. Or a couple plates. You need to come in so that she’s supplicating you, not the reverse.
I’d say I was out of town for a month if needed to give yourself time to meet new females if you haven’t done that yet. And hit it hard.
LikeLike
> “a couple months ago”
Unfortunately, it hasn’t been long enough yet for you to be able to have any good perspective on what happened between the two of you.
> “LTR/marriage material”
Has any part of her body touched another man’s penis in the interim [since you saw her last]?
Or was she already cheating on you when she broke up with you?
If the answer to either of these questions is “Yes”, then she is NOT marriage material.
LikeLike
LIFO STACK, PART II
> “How do I play this?”
First and foremost, you need to step back and take a breath and try to see the forest for the trees.
If I were you, then I would be concentrating on perceiving the real true actual honest answer to the question, “SO WHY DID SHE BREAK UP WITH ME THE FIRST TIME AROUND?”
If the answer is something along the lines of, “Because she had a hungering for strange cock,” then move on with your life.
But if the answer is something more along the lines of, “Because I used to be a whining little beta herbling manboob loser and I didn’t deserve her,” then ask yourself what you could do to improve your character so that you might be able to deserve her in the future.
Normally my advice would be: “NEXT!”
But if there is any hope that you could get some children out of her, and that she wouldn’t cuckold you, and that she wouldn’t divorce rape you, and that you could plausibly stand a chance of living happily ever after and watching your kids have grandkids and blah blah blah, then Man Up and become the True Alpha whom she needs as her Rock of Gibraltar.
But not if there was any strange cock involved.
Strange cock is an absolute deal-breaker.
LikeLike
But if she leaves him, what’s she supposed to do, get to a nunnery?
The way to become that True Alpha is by practice, which necessarily involves other girls. I just see it as both of them coming back together again, if at all, where he is in a place of greater knowledge and greater abundance, and so her juices flow involuntarily and she’s saying (also involuntarily) “you’re different.” I wouldn’t blame her too much for strange cock in the interim, for this reason. She’s playing within the rules, having broken up.
Then he can decide what he feels about the situation. But it’s all win for him to take the steps toward getting there.
LikeLike
“Hey you” = DTF
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/04/10/hey-you/
Don’t take her back as a girlfriend for an LTR. She dumped your ass for someone else she felt was superior to you, and now she’s paid the price for her error in judgment. Her text reeks of dat crawl-back, ya dig?
Instead, you’ll wanna lead her on by telling her to meet you at a motel (which she has booked and paid for), and give her the hate fuck you know she secretly desires. Once you bust, don’t even bother wiping off the jizz from her face before you pull up your pants and walk out the door. Bonus points if you hid a camera in the room to film her sexual degradation in all its glory.
After that, delete her number and block it to avoid the subsequent shitstorm that will be coming your way.
LikeLike
“Hey you” = DTF
Yes, I’ve noticed this, over the years.
LikeLike
Also, in your TXT reply, do NOT be a nice guy.
Absolutely no altar boy horseshit.
No grovelling.
Think of the snarliest orneriest hamster-spinning-est aloofness that you can come up with.
“Are you that chick who got her teeth on the head of my cock during the blow jobs? That shit was painful as hell.”
“Remind me again – are you the one with the B-Cups who was thinking about the breast enhancements?”
“So how’s that Ambien addiction going for ya?”
“You’re the one with the mom who is kinduva MILF?”
“So did you ever learn to cook worth a damn since the last time I saw you?”
“You were the one who was going away to take the Home Economics curriculum so that they could teach you how to iron my shirts?”
“Hey, now that I’ve got your ear, tell me what was your little sister’s cell phone number? Thanks!”
“Were you able to lose any weight since I last saw you? If so, then I hope that 100% of the weight loss didn’t come from your boobs shrinking down to a B-Cup from their old C-Cups.”
LikeLike
> “Are you that chick whose left titty was a B-cup and whose right titty was a C-cup?”
LikeLike
SHe broke up with me because I lost frame and became all anxious-nervous as a result of a highly unpredicatable situation. It was a trainwreck, but everything prior was rock-solid. I was pissed at her for juding/breaking-up with me because of ONE fuck-up.
But beyond that, she is high quality and we have a lot of basic commonality. I have no reason to believe (at this time) that she couldn’t be a good wife/mother, yadda, yadda. She’s 29 years old and I know she must be worrying about the big 3-0.
Her problem is she thinks her stupid little jobs matter to anybody.
Those are all good surly txt suggestions, but I don’t think they’ll fly with her. Too crude and “mean.”
I was thinking of something more benign along the lines of something cocky/funny: “I’m doing good. That was a serious delayed response on your part. . .”
I have dated (and gotten laid) since she dumped me, but don’t have a steady that I could consider a plate. When on a first date/meeting yesterday with a hottie, but she aint a plate/lay yet.
LikeLike
Also, how long do I wait to text back?
LikeLike
> “Too crude and “mean.””
> “how long do I wait to text back?”
Wait a few days.
But then you HAVE to get in a dig.
Let her know who wears the pants in the relationship.
“I’ve got some shirts which need to be washed and ironed. Like about 10 of them. You could come by and do them on Sunday while I’m at the game.”
“Gosh, I dunno, your lasagna recipe wasn’t exactly the greatest the last time you made it for me. Although I do have some dirty dishes which you could wash. Also my toilet bowl and bathtub could use a good scrubbing.”
Disinterest – not butthurtness – but aloof amusement.
Establishment of dominance.
Declaration of masculinity.
That’s what you’re after.
LikeLike
OK good you’ve moved on. Yes you have. Now you can look at it with perspective.
And one perspective you need to address is “why would she split after one fuckup”? Let me tell you as an old married guy (married over 15 years, raising our kids), this is a giant red flag, maybe a disqualifying one. There WILL be future fuckups, and if you have kids with her, her attraction to you WILL decrease greatly as she transfers her attraction to you into motherly love for the kids. She can’t feel them all at the same time, not intensely anyway. You need a woman who will love the kids out of instinct and stay with you out of duty. An honorable woman.
They are rare. This one seems to have failed an early test. Use the information well, do not ignore it.
I am not big on hate fucks because I am not big on the value of hating. I am however big on the value of winning. So if you hate her, fine nothing wrong with it. But if you don’t, you don’t have to start. Have a victory fuck or two, then grill the shit out of her on why she left you so conveniently. The purpose of this is not to stimulate her attraction, but to see if she has any chance of becoming your wife. You have to have a reason to think she has truly repented, i.e. changed.
Why not date her in a rotation for a while? You will be casual, she will be desperately trying to hide her suffering, let her suffer longer than she made you suffer. Your instinct to put it behind you is noble, but she is a woman not a noble creature. They only respect base things like power and revenge.
LikeLike
The more I think about this, the more I support the rotation idea.
One reason is to make her suffer and remember, in case you get back together exclusively.
The other reason is to give the hottie a chance. Seriously. Maybe the hottie wants to be your wife and have your children. Maybe the hottie is morally superior to the old and older girl, and won’t leave you at a vulnerable moment because there’s a lull in the flow of vaginal stimulation. Maybe the hottie is just better for you and your future family, and that’s all that matters.
Seriously. Take the hottie just as seriously. Give her a real chance to compete for you. Use old girl as social proof with her, just as you use the hottie as social proof with the old girl.
Make it a fair competition. Be fully prepared to cut the old girl loose, simply because she lost the competition. You are highly desirable, do not sell yourself short.
You’re fully entitled to be in charge and make the choices in your own way, in fact it is your natural role.
LikeLike
> “And one perspective you need to address is “why would she split after one fuckup”?”
That’s what I’m saying above.
If he’s really seriously thinking about settling down with this chick and making babies with her, then he has got to get at the root cause here.
Not what he wishes the root cause might have been, but to be completely and brutally honest with himself and to strive with all his might to see her for who she really is.
[And to see himself for who he really is – has he graduated to True Alpha status yet, or, deep down inside, is he still a whining snivelling beta manboob herbling loser?]
Which is why the presence or absence of strange cock is such a fundamentally important determining factor in the analysis.
If she was riding a strange carousel, then she’s just another rank whore.
She is NOT mother material.
NEXT!!!!!
On the other hand, if they had an honest break-up, and no other cock was involved, then there is a chance – A VERY SLIM CHANCE – that she has given it some thought, and that she sincerely regrets what happened.
LikeLike
> “her stupid little jobs matter to anybody”
JOBS?
Is she doing freelance work?
Travelling a lot?
Could you elaborate?
Cause if you are at all serious about settling down with this chick, then she has to understand, in no uncertain terms, that FAMILY ALWAYS COMES BEFORE CAREER.
She is a mother first.
And a “whatever” second.
If she isn’t ready to walk away from her career and start pushing out your babies, then she ain’t mother material.
LikeLike
Did you initiate contact at all, in any form post breakup
LikeLike
Reminds me of my live-in gf when I was losing personal money hand over fist during one of those financial meltdowns. While this was going on, I suppose she picked up on the stress and (what else?) proceeded to make my life a living hell when I got back from work, day in and day out. Once the damage was done, she broke up with me. Thanks, babe.
(My advice, since you ask? Move on. To her, you’re obviously expendable.)
LikeLike
> “I suppose she picked up on the stress and (what else?) proceeded to make my life a living hell when I got back from work, day in and day out.”
GOOD RIDDANCE!!!
Filthy fucking back-stabbing whore.
Thank your lucky stars that you didn’t make any babies with her, because, at this point, the judge would only be letting you see your children about one weekend per month, and the whore would be mudsharking herself to some damned nigger named Keyshawnqua, and spending all of your child support payments to subsidize his Schlitz Malt Liquor Bull porch monkey step-n-fetch-it lifestyle.
Try to remember everything about that bitch which should have served as a warning that she was just another whore and then be damned certain not to fall for another girl who has any of those same qualities.
LikeLike
Just turn her into a plate. Case closed. You don’t need to be a dick to her. Just ‘I’m doing good….you wanna come over/hangout some time?’
Boom. Done deal.
LikeLike
Emoticon usage = LOL
LikeLike
Fat short balding 70 year old H.G. Wells had lover after lover, supposedly smelled of honey. I think smell is quite important to women.
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/jun/22/biography.highereducation1
LikeLike
> “I think smell is quite important to women.”
I think smell is hugely important to EVERYONE.
And smell would be a vastly more heavily researched topic in the Social Sciences if it weren’t so horribly politically incorrect, owing to the fact that Jews and Niggers both smell like diarrhea.
LikeLike
That’s a bit unfair on blacks who, at 86% daily actually shower more than do Whites. The other 14% aren’t in jail yet.
LikeLike
Even the negresses whom I liked [and, believe it or not, I have known some negresses who were just darling gals] – smelled pretty horrible.
And every jewish pussy I ever smelled was just foul.
LikeLike
I’m amazed at what you say about Jewish women, not having had the pleasure myself. But I’d have thought that lack of hygiene would not have been a characteristic……
LikeLike
Not so much hygiene as it is that the fluids being secreted just stink to high heaven.
In their defense, I doubt that there’s a damn thing that they could do about it – their current aromas were probably determined by their ancestors and ancestresses a good 5000 or 10,000 years ago.
Same with the poor negresses [although, for them, it was probably more like 50,000 or 100,000 years ago].
LikeLike
LIFO’ed / Kevin Conboy’ed / Moderater’ed reply will appear in three to five bidness days.
LikeLike
Well played, you got it popped off the stack. Never considered that racial – olfactory correlation.
LikeLike
I think smell is quite important to women.
Yes, smell is very important to females, which is why chaps should wear the proper cologne.
LikeLike
Also, work out regularly and wash. Obviously.
LikeLike
Tough call. Been approached/pursued by some lovely idiot HB “teachers” during the stinkiest of workouts (yoga – created by men, for men only). Could not stop “adjusting” me, while neglecting to touch anyone else.
Can HBs smell testsoterone? No. Is there something in their ape heads that allows them to smell other seemingly imperceptible chems associated with high T? Various experiments point to maybe.
Apes hate getting wet. There are no showers in the jungle. If you don’t like her stink, she’s not right for you. Reject all foul trim (ykw or not).
No industrial chemical “colognes” for me. I’ll take my pick of the ones that want to be my slaves. If she doesn’t swallow your cock after a good sweaty work out, find a few that will. They are out there.
Never apologize for anything. Especially smelling like a man.
LikeLike
Smell is important. I actually think that chicks dig light musk.
LikeLike
lzozlzolzlzl. Fattie told to lose weight by BF, loses weight, then dumps BF.
http://us.cnn.com/2014/03/24/health/irpt-weight-loss-nina-osegueda/?iref=obnetwork
LikeLike
“After losing all that weight, I got into these cool syringe-delivered drugs for a while, quite intensely in fact. And then, after finding me passed out in a McDonalds rest room, my next thin blond drug-free bf told me he thought it was bad for me and I should quit. OMG the nerve of that guy. Anyway, I got help from him on getting clean and once I was done it probably won’t surprise you I broke up with that fucking shallow jerk.”
LikeLike
And this was kind of weird
“Her legal name is Balvina Austin, but she kept Nina Osegueda, the name she grew up with, as her stage name.”
No issues there, nope.
LikeLike
lzozlzolzzlzl CH can you believe that the majority of sheeple here in the US are so fat and stupid with fat on the brain that they need to be taught this information?:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/03/health/upwave-stamina-5-ways/index.html?hpt=hp_t3
These same sheeple are the same ones who have to be told that eating 2,000 calorie meals at McDonald’s (not counting 1,000 calorie sodas) 3 times a day is not good.
LikeLike
Chateau Heartiste…Where GBFM plies his nonsense because he can’t launch a blog on his own.
Grow. The. Fuck. Up.
LikeLike
Get thee to a nunnery!
LikeLike
[…] Perspicacious and numerate commenter “St” writes in response to this post about Shakespeare having his male characters utter fewer words than their romantic female counterparts, CH, I hope you realize that 101/155 = 65.1% Which is disturbingly… […]
LikeLike
I break this rule all the time, but only if I’m making myself laugh. Someone on the forums called it “self-amusement game”, which I think fits well. I keep chucking out nonsense that shouldn’t be entertaining to girls, and in return I have their attention.
I read a comment about a year or so ago that summarized something for me that I needed to know but didn’t: (paraphrasing)
“My heart dies a little with every success”
Or something like that. According to the old rules, the way I treat women shouldn’t work. But it does work. Self-amusement, even at her expense, gets her tingling.
LikeLike