• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Civilization-Womanization Graph
Alpha Male Of The Month »

A Giddy Reminder Of The Evil Influence Of Feminism

April 8, 2014 by CH

For those optimists who don’t think lying liars and the mendacious ideas they propagate matter, President Barry Kenyatta-Downlow Obama today signed two executive orders addressing the so-called “sex pay gap” myth that feminists have been menstruating over the national discourse for decades. In one order, federal contractors will now have to report how they allocate their wages by sex and race to the Inquisition government.

Ideas matter. The public megaphone matters. The pay gap as it is exploited by feminists and their shit lapping allies is entirely explainable by organic forces manifesting from innate sex differences. Hoped-for UGH MISOGYNIST discrimination has got nothing to do with it. Once adjustments are made for variables like occupational choice, downtime, part-time work, leave, hours worked, and natural sex-based variation in ambition and conflict resolution, the pay gap DISAPPEARS. In fact, some studies have shown that, after these adjustments, women actually make a little MORE than men on average.

Why is this important? Because the policies that evil ideas generate are actively harmful to the people who don’t personally benefit from the lies. You can lay at the crooked labia of feminist ideology the consequences of futile efforts to correct the “pay gap” in the name of helping women “lean in”. Employers have a new pointless cost to cover, and undoubtedly they will shift some of that cost onto their male employees. They suffer, consumers suffer, government efficiency (such as it is) suffers. Social distrust leeches into every facet of life. And, in the THX-amplified CH-widescreen picture, lower male wages undermine the marriage market.

Tell me again how feminism is irrelevant. With a straight face.

Yet there are normally clear-thinking scoffers who, emotionally shackled to their manicured knee-jerk caricatures of anti-feminists as *derp incel bitterboys*, fail to grasp what’s happening right before their eyes. Or, grasping it, disregard the tangible evil in favor of fantastical theoretical journeys to the “source” of the evil, which, they reason, is the only recourse to eliminating the influence of deranged and feels-propped ideologies shaping government policy RIGHT NOW.

CH is well-versed in the pleasures of excavating downward through cultural detritus to find the root causes of feminism and it’s parent evilology Equalism, and of offering solutions. Being “anti-feminist” and being a “root cause-ist” aren’t mutually exclusive; if anything, these stances are mutually reinforcing. And, procedural note, managerialism is likely not the ultimate source of feminism; that dishonor more likely belongs to genetic changes brought on by NW European excessive outbreeding.

But yeah, go ahead and spend your sadistic capital mocking anti-feminists as one after another feminist proposal sees the light of day and earns public acceptance and protection from realtalk ridicule. Meantime, see how far talk about “managerialism” severed from the actual lying propagandists thriving within the managerialist system gets you with the voters. Nah, I prefer my shivs aimed for the solar plexus, at the filthy fucking liars pushing their gruel down a gullible people’s throats.

I get why some men dismiss the threat of feminism. Some are low intensity suburbanites happy to have settled for dutiful and loving frump wives who cook for them and pursue lifestyles totally removed from the sphere of feminist babble. Others date cutiepie sorority types who haven’t so much as uttered the word “feminist” their whole lives. Still others have been out of the dating market for ten or twenty years and have lost touch with the energies that guide women’s mate choices and the pro-feminist social lubrications which younger urban SWPLette women easily imbibe and regurgitate.

To these men, white knighting comes naturally because they don’t see any direct line from the easygoing women in their own lives to the feminist assault on innate sex differences and, ultimately, on Western civilization. And yet, when the reasonable women they know enter the voting booth, a majority of them vote for feminism-loving politicians, and the skew is especially pronounced if they’re unmarried. If that gives you hope, do note that single women are a growing demographic cohort.

The day-to-day details of the non-confrontational, marginally empowered, platitude parroting woman hardly impress as antidotes to seismic feminist lies when job purges for crimethink are becoming the norm and government policy is twisting into pretzels to accommodate femcunt poopytalk. Maybe you think-tankingly believe quoting a few Burnham passages is the panacea to the black tentacle goo of feminism and equalism corrupting a new institution by the day. It could be, but people respond better to real world enemies identified and engaged.

Women are natural followers. You attack feminism and ostracize its advocates to lead women away from its carrion call. You do this in conjunction with deeper exegeses on root causes for Western social and cultural dissolution. Every attack angle counts when the castle is under siege. The front line is everywhere.

Or you could derp about anti-feminist bitter divorcees and nerdy incels (characterizations which, by the way, aren’t true to life; the most joyous anti-feminists I know are happy-go-lucky players who get laid at will), and watch from the sidelines as yet another workaday stiff is tossed out on his rump by cackling hags offended by a lame dongle joke.

As a related afterthought, I wonder if leftoids understand the logical end goal of all their anti-pay gap agit-prop? Do they sincerely want a world where everyone, despite his talent or efforts, is awarded a $100K annual lifetime salary? Just level the playing field completely and be done with their griping. Some people are hard-wired to work no matter the recompense or status compression, but surely there will be millions of marginal cases who will say “fuck it” and drop out to collect the same salary doing nothing. And then you can kiss your comfortable cosmopolitan life goodbye.

That’s the thermal exhaust port of leftoid equalists: they never think through the consequences of their spur-of-the-moment feels.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Culture, Feminist Idiocy, Hope and Change, Ugly Truths | 176 Comments

176 Responses

  1. on April 8, 2014 at 3:48 pm askjoe

    There is something in the real world about the last part. As I vaguely recall, executive compensation was capped at some point, or in some way limited. Eventually, to compete for talent, stock options as compensation were created.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 3:53 pm burke

      in ww2 pay was regulated and insurance became the bargaining tool to get decent talent. other outlets from the regulatory state are black markets (working under the table, other compensation, etc.). but there’s no way around the laws of economics, even for a lightbringer

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 11:21 am markgm28

        When the economy is poisoned, the pure man becomes a counter economist. When the law is perverted, the good man becomes an outlaw.

        LikeLike


  2. on April 8, 2014 at 3:49 pm A Giddy Reminder Of The Evil Influence Of Feminism | Manosphere.com

    […] A Giddy Reminder Of The Evil Influence Of Feminism […]

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 4:06 pm Zombie Shane

      > “To these men, white knighting comes naturally because they don’t see any direct line from the easygoing women in their own lives to the feminist assault on innate sex differences and, ultimately, on Western civilization. And yet, when the reasonable women they know enter the voting booth, a majority of them vote for feminism-loving politicians, and the skew is especially pronounced if they’re unmarried.”

      This the true purpose of feminism.

      To destroy the family, to eradicate the ties which ought to bind women to men, and to unleash the insanity of the unbonded unregulated untempered female mind as a weapon with which to destroy Western Civilization.

      To use the single females – and similarly weak-minded souls, such as the chimpanzees, the armadillos, the gooks, and the curry-n*ggers – to vote the Frankfurt School into power so that the Frankfurt School can then be free to annihilate and eradicate our civilization.

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 5:00 pm irishsavant

        Of all the evil constructs developed by the Frankfurt School to destroy our civilisation the worst (best from their perspective) has been the doctrine of feminism. Think about it, almost all the evils that beset us today have been caused or are enhanced by this foul and anti-human creation.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 5:58 pm Zombie Shane

        > “almost all the evils that beset us today”

        And all of those evils serve to BENEFIT the Frankfurt School.

        None of the insanity of the modern world makes any sense until you take off the rose-colored glasses, and start asking yourself:

        WWAND?

        [What Would A Nihilist Do?]

        And then suddenly all of the insanity starts to make sense.

        You come to realize that it’s all intentional.

        That it all has a purpose.

        And that its purpose is to destroy and annihilate and eradicate everything which we [and our ancestors] constructed, everything which we [and our ancestors] created, everything which we and [and our ancestors] held dear.

        That we are on the receiving end of an all-out total war, the goal of which is our absolute EXTINCTION.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 2:02 am Subway Masturbator

        Again we see! it’s ill-defined, but I KNOW IT WHEN I SEE THEM!!!

        It’s the Frankfurters!! The Frankfurters!!!

        Anyway, this seems a vote getting move to insure the Dems get a strong majority of the female vote, and they already got the Hispanics. sooooo…. the Rethuglicans..get … the HOUSE again…

        IN any event, I also agree this is unreasonable, if the facts about the pay gap being false are true.

        Every time I see someone DOING something difficult, it’s almost always a guy… fat women sit in my office along with us homo guys, but I sure didn’t see many in my murderously hard computer science classes…

        But since we have a two party system. and the Rethugs are strictly for the owning class, and the dems are for everyone….

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 8:04 am Zombie Shane

        Yo, Mr Sunstein, check it out – look at what your cuz, Nate Silver, is up to now!

        According to the Washington Post, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is building a huge computer database that will let it predict women’s marital status. That way they can “pinpoint unmarried women as the target of specific, poll-test messages,” according to one source quoted in the story.

        http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/040814-696394-single-women-are-far-more-liberal-than-married-women.htm

        Posted at IBD a mere two and a half hours after I started this thread.

        Like frigging clockwork.

        NEVER DOUBT THE ZOMBIE!!!

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 8:07 am PDA

        The Frankfurt School tipped over a domino, knowing what would happen when they did. They don’t need to tip over every subsequent domino, there is now a horde of drones who plug into the hive daily for the latest updates who do their work for them – as planned.

        “Organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.” – Willi Munzenberg

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 4:28 pm irishsavant

        Dominoes, great analogy. I’ve often struggled to explain to people who say ‘well most of the people (pushing PC, feminism, anti-White etc,) are not Jews. So there!

        Mental note taken.

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 7:28 pm corvinus

        I should point out that Munzenberg (who is most likely in hell right now) meant that by making “life impossible”, they mean specifically making procreation and raising the next generation impossible.

        LikeLike


      • on April 11, 2014 at 5:25 am PDA

        My take on that statement was the cultural Marxism should be used to corrupt Western society at every level. Screwing up the family is part and parcel of that, and they went for the weakest links – women and children. Marxists have always seen the family as the enemy. The future relies on having sound kids that can turn into sound adults. Screw up the kids, you screw up the future. Screwing up the parents allows you to screw up the kids.

        LikeLike


      • on April 11, 2014 at 5:52 am thwack

        PDA

        The Frankfurt School tipped over a domino, knowing what would happen when they did. They don’t need to tip over every subsequent domino
        ——————————————————————————————–

        So how is this any different from what the racists do to black people?

        The production of ni66ers is a white craft industry.

        LikeLike


  3. on April 8, 2014 at 3:51 pm gunslingergregi

    yea with a bunch of people yesterday i sid what pay gap men and woman get paid the same for the same job exactly same base pay in my old company then they even created job titles for only woman that got paid the same as supervisors with no supervisor responsibility how could it get any mor equal than that
    unless your gonna say an entry level chick needs to make same as the ceo
    i think they want pay the same cause what gonna happen is the kids are gonna end up getting taken away from men and woman and both are gonna have to pay government daddy child support
    i see this happening now in real life

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 4:04 pm no

      single women who work and have no children get 92% of what men make….there is no pay gap..

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 8:36 pm gunslingergregi

        no they get 100 percent of what men make for same job there is no pay gap

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 11:05 pm Glenbert

        No. On urban areas, they put earn them.

        LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 9:00 pm yeahokcool

      Gregi! What’s up man? Any crazy shit lately?

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 11:30 pm gunslingergregi

        3 months of eating really good
        my chick coming off the chain with the cooking skills
        my dad never ate better she be bringing him plates lol
        managing my one way open relationship
        how bout you

        LikeLike


  4. on April 8, 2014 at 3:52 pm gunslingergregi

    dam my shit didn’t post say what

    LikeLike


  5. on April 8, 2014 at 3:54 pm gunslingergregi

    they want equal pay cause men and woman both gonna pay child support to the gov raising their kids i see this happening now

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 11:47 pm FamilyMan

      Where does anyone pay CS to the government except as a passthru to the custodial spouse?

      It has been theorized that the government makes so much margin as intermediary that they like CS for that reason, but I don’t think that’s what you mean.

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 12:51 am gunslingergregi

        neither parent has kid both told to pay child support had there kid taken away they live apart
        yea its real

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 2:06 am Subway Masturbator

        As someone who works where I have to report to child protective services, this could and probably has happened. If both parents are deemed to be “unfit” they could take the kid away, give it to a paid foster parent, and bill both bio-breeders.

        At THIS point, they would have to be significantly impaired fuckups, but it could progress.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 12:23 pm markgm28

        Sounds like a step along the planned path of the family being replaced by the state

        LikeLike


  6. on April 8, 2014 at 3:57 pm commenting101

    I am one of those marginal millions about ready to say “fuck it” and check out of the work force. Why bother working when nobody else in going to? Or when the reward does not equal the results.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 4:00 pm jjbees

      Tragedy of the commons / free-rider problem

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 7:44 pm Grim

      Yep. And ch points out,, feminism is communism. That is exactly what we have in this country now.

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 11:49 pm FamilyMan

      If it’s a rational choice, it’s a rational choice. You’ll get no moralizing from me.

      If free-rider status is available to “them”, we might as well use it too. Otherwise how can we say we are smarter than they are?

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 12:24 pm markgm28

        “Starve the Beast” strategy

        LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 2:07 am Subway Masturbator

      But who will feed and house you?

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 6:22 am Carlos Danger

        You will.

        LikeLike


  7. on April 8, 2014 at 3:59 pm jjbees

    99.9% of species that existed. The same goes for civilizations,

    Just lie back, close your eyes. Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 4:53 pm Zombie Shane

      There are two kinds of dudes in this world:

      1) Those who fade quietly into extinction, and

      2) Those who put buns in their bitches ovens [and, s/p Griswold & Roe, see those buns through to the buns’ live births nine months later], and who thereby leave an indelible imprint upon the Tree of Life Itself.

      It’s your choice.

      Death.

      Or Life.

      You decide.

      LikeLike


  8. on April 8, 2014 at 4:07 pm anonymous

    “Yet there are normally clear-thinking scoffers who, emotionally shackled to their manicured knee-jerk caricatures of anti-feminists as *derp incel bitterboys* […]”

    It’s humblebrag peacocking – something entirely too many men online are guilty of engaging in.

    “Look at me, I’m doing so well that I can afford to tell everyone that I don’t care about this or that issue, and that anyone who does care must be doing much more poorly than I am”.

    The rationalization hamster is every bit as much a male phenomenon as it is a female one.

    Fantastic post overall, one of your most important yet… and in sharp contrast with your usual poolside recommendation.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 9:21 pm Bill Brasky

      “Look at me, I’m doing so well that I can afford to tell everyone that I don’t care about this or that issue, and that anyone who does care must be doing much more poorly than I am”.

      Excellent point.

      I have long seen this traitorous status whoring game as at the center of many of our problems.

      Look at me, Im such a top dog that Im not threatened by the destruction of my people, my culture, all that 50000 years worth of my ancestors built…*adjusts flatbill*

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 4:41 am FamilyMan

        I’m totally confused by your comment and the one you reply to. Whose post are you criticizing and why?

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 5:00 am ho

        He is referring to PLEASUREMAN from mpc.com. What a weirdo.

        You know, you can’t be a grown man if you watch anime because being drawn instead of created by live actors means IT CANNOT BE “mature” even if the plot and characters are the same.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 5:41 am ho

        Could also refer to Matt Forney.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 7:48 pm Bill Brasky

        I honestly don’t see what wasn’t clear about my post, or to whom I was responding…

        Anonymous above pointed out that a lot of what you hear from white male regressives, or the watered down versions that might call themselves PUAs, is really “humblebrag peacocking”.

        They make a show of not being threatened by racial, cultural, or political threats to their well-being as a way of displaying high status. Like always painting racially aware white guys as rednecks, trash, insecure losers, etc.

        It’s a quisling game. It’s disgusting. And I believe its what lets YKW get away with what they have been doing.

        LikeLike


  9. on April 8, 2014 at 4:09 pm Peter Connor

    CH is on a roll today. In my experience with a Fortune 100 corporation, women were almost impossible to fire, did less work, and were promoted sooner. Equality would have been an improvement for men.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 9:17 pm FamilyMan

      It was especially like that in engineering. Women didn’t have good technical minds but they always seemed to come out on top in personnel decisions and ascend to management.

      The only woman I saw who had to sweat was one who worked for a female manager. This still seems to work. I constantly see women saying they want to work for men because the men are more reasonable. Reasonable as in giving them unfair advantages.

      But if female managers give men an occasional advantage, who am I to complain? It’s just the natural heterosexual way.

      LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 11:10 am Grim

      This is also true in the world of law for anyone younger than 40. As I sometimes do, I can add some insight from the law profession. Once again, my Gen X status coincided precisely with a tipping point. The class of 1999 or 2000 was just about the time it became well known that women make up more than half of new law students. New students who entered last school around 1996 or 1997, in other words.

      This is not “sour grapes,” because I was top 5% and had no trouble getting my Biglaw job upon graduation. I was one of those who had my job lined up and spent my entire 3rd year of law school knowing my big firm job was waiting for me, having received my offer the previous summer.

      But, that’s because I was top 5%. I have first hand knowledge both from law school and from being inside firms for 15 years since graduation, from friends both male and female, from observing, that: to be blunt, pretty (for a lawyercunt), thin women get hired because of their legs. Now feminists might complain that this is a strike against men because it’s dirty old men who are doing the hiring. I was number 5 in my class. One of my good friends was number 6 in the class (out of about 115). This dude was a normal looking dude, very very very intelligent, could hold a conversation — not an omega tool. He is a little bit short, about 5’7″. This dude could not get a fucking job, either in the 2nd summer when everyone gets their summer clerkship that leads to permanent offers. And plenty of other dudes like him — very smart, ranked between top 6% and 20% of the class, had trouble getting jobs.

      Every single female in the “top” 85% of the class had no trouble having 6 offers from major firms in whatever city she wanted. These females were *not* as capable. They were the ones always staying after class to ask the professors questions. Probably fucking them, I don’t know.

      Then on the job…. yeah.. less work, more 9-5 type hours, literally same pay (associates in biglaw on a set pay scale for the first 8 years). I would have to admit that these women are not complete retards and they chose to work in a “male” field…..they had AT LEAST as much opportunity to get hired and got the same $130,000 starting salary for a newly minted lawyer in a mid-major city and $10,000 to $15,000 raises every year for 8 years.

      They are actually getting paid MORE when one considers that their money is play money, literally for them to buy themselves shoes, handbags, and nice appointments for their apartments, because they get as many free meals a week as they want from beta suitors. Then 80% of them “retire” and stop working by the 7th year, wasting that 7 years the firm invested in them while taking a slot from a man who needed that job to provide for himself and his family for 40 years.

      As I told my bitter spinster ex GF who has a STEM degree but failed to put it to use actually working in engineering, and who thinks this is a “man’s world” because Puffed Ho told her so, and who has a 140 IQ, she absolutely could have the same $180,000 salary I have (or more) if she had chosen to go to law school (oh yeah…at least as easy for them to get accepted to law school in the first place too) and work the 60 hour weeks with almost no vacation that I (and many women) did my first 6 years out of law school.

      There is, of course, affirmative action and big companies (law firms and business), of course, make extra effort to hire women and any woman who WANTS to do that work gets hired and paid the exact same lockstep salary as a man.

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 7:00 pm ( @ Y @ )

        Law… *shudders*

        Good post nonetheless

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 7:02 am Grim

        I agree. I wish I had never gone to law school, as does every single non-YKW lawyer in the United States.

        American “law” today is YKW law, 100%. I could explain this comment at a deep intellectual level. I suspect many here might get what I’m saying.

        Being a lawyer today IS YKWish. I didn’t know that when I was 21 and decided to go to law school.

        LikeLike


  10. on April 8, 2014 at 4:12 pm Tartarus

    MPC = Omega boulevard.There’s absolutely nothing of value there that can’t be found elsewhere.

    LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 5:02 am ho

      Bullshit. MPC is full of brilliant people, but some of the posters there (most prominently the admin) seems to have a weird hardon for dissing “nerds” whatever the hell that means.

      Who cares that Ron Paul supports almost everything you support. NERDS like him. Therefore, I shall mock him by saying DR PAUL MD.

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 10:31 am Tartarus

        You can be brilliant and an omega at the same time. The fact remains that the bulk of MPC are the gender equivalent of anti-racists and Pleasureman is their Tim Wise, if Tim Wise didn’t have a big house, a wife and two children.

        LikeLike


  11. on April 8, 2014 at 4:16 pm JCclimber

    It may be their thermal exhaust port, but what kind of torpedos are we dropping in there? One thing I like about this site is that it isn’t always PUA technique number 892, and permutations thereof. Relentless and unceasing attack from all angles.

    While it is interesting to see the slowly increasing number of attacks on bankers and their families, perhaps an additional benefit would be gained by similar “suicide by nail gun” on hollywood movers and shakers.

    Feminism must be scorned, ridiculed, and it needs to be done rhetorically, not through the ineffective recitation of dry facts and extrapolations.

    Think of it as training in the art of wooing women. Defying expectations. Maintaining frame. Amused mastery. All excellent tools in both endeavors.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 8:33 pm Anonymous

      In post coital bliss, ask, “Are you a feminist?”

      If she’s answers, “Yes”, respond with:

      “OK. Feminists are for one night stands and real women are for relationships. Now, gtfo.”

      LikeLike


  12. on April 8, 2014 at 4:27 pm The One

    If you really want to hit the solar plexus, INCOME TAX. Non reportable income would mean no child support, alimony, equal pay, etc etc. Stop cutting the branches, STRIKE THE ROOT.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 7:33 pm Zombie Shane

      The purpose of Game within a marriage is to make your wive so steamingly drippingly frenziedly hot-between-the-legs for you that she would NEVER even dream of leaving you.

      That she would want nothing more than to spread her legs for you and give you even MORE babies than she has already given you.

      LikeLike


  13. on April 8, 2014 at 4:31 pm Director

    Mucus Ballsack and the Temple are responsible for this.

    That dirty fucking Mocha PUA in the White House.

    He’s your imaginary black boyfriend, girls.

    LikeLike


  14. on April 8, 2014 at 4:56 pm elmer

    I simply repeat my by now cliche’ Elmer’s Law :

    Women are competing for jobs but are not creating them. Though men shank me and insult me, only men provide me with opportunity. Women can only insult me and deprive me of opportunity. Only men, and only a small fraction of them, take the risks that create industry and opportunity. Women can only serve as mere functionaries in man-created structures. When an organization becomes feminized, priority shifts from efficient and profitable production of goods and services to development of labyrinthine rules for the comfort and security of women. Ossification and organizational death are inevitable.

    Peter Drucker, in his famous essay Managing Oneself, advised strongly the need to understand your strengths and weaknesses, and observed that you can never win by improving your weaknesses, only by improving your strengths. In broader socio-economic terms, we have given women the opportunity to build on their weaknesses (ability to compete against men) and discouraged them from capitalizing on their strengths (youth and fertility). They compete through artifices of fairness and inclusion that are borne on the backs of an ever-dwindling pool of male supporters. We have weakened society as a whole by building on women’s weaknesses in attempts to make them the equal of men, rather than encouraging them in their natural strengths. And while this charade is going on, men are encouraged to adopt feminine attitudes and lifestyles at the expense of their own natural strengths, now deemed unnecessary in the new gender-neutral economy.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 5:11 pm elmer

      The death blow to American innovation and job creation will come when Obama signs Title IX enforcement on engineering schools.

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 9:21 pm FamilyMan

        I don’t think that will happen. Yes it would kill the USA.

        But they are creating a small exception so that at least we can create STEM workers (even though we economically hobble them once they graduate so they can’t collect nearly the full economic value of their skill.) For example, Common Core will be very oppressive in the humanities, but that seems to bypass at least the more advanced tech. courses that future STEMmers will be taking.

        We’re willing to sacrifice the 80% but the central planners don’t dare mess with that other 20%. Yet. Knock on wood.

        LikeLike


  15. on April 8, 2014 at 5:00 pm Norse Fire

    As a general rule, the types who trumpet equal pay, are of the delusion that beauticians and hairdressers should be paid the same as mechanics and plumbers.

    Hint: They shouldn’t. The latter group is necessary for the logistics of an industrialised society, and if the former doesn’t show up for work en masse, the only consequence is un-waxed lady thatches and some daggy ‘doos.

    I see that totalitarian humanism is tightening is fetid grip.

    LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 6:28 am Carlos Danger

      Beauticians make good money.

      LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 12:57 pm markgm28

      Yeah I read a salon or jizzabel or some bs article where the femcunt said almost exactly that, that society will be equal when a hairdresser makes the same as an oil extraction technician.
      In an educated society, you’d expect people to be familiar with basic economic concepts such as supply & demand, competition, and utility. Not the case with the people in the comments section of that retarded-commie article. They mostly agreed with her! It was ridiculous.
      Oil offers more usefulness (utility) than pretty hair. People have greater demand for oil than for hairdressing. Proficient oil extraction takes more training than hairdressing. Oil extraction is more dangerous than hairdressing. More people are able to cut hair than extract oil. All of these economic factors aren’t even considered by those low-iq marxist clowns.

      LikeLike


  16. on April 8, 2014 at 5:05 pm JohnDSee

    Just like racism. Cut to the end-game. With feminists it’s equal pay and equal outcome (right). With racism it’s probably, ‘Let’s enslave the offspring of all white people for the next 10 generations.’ Crazy?

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 7:42 pm Zombie Shane

      Where the chimpanzees and the armadillos [and, increasingly, the gooks] are just the brutish thug Schutzstaffel stormtroopers doing the bidding of their Frankfurt School masters.

      I.e. in the end, it will be the Frankfurt School which does the enslaving.

      Which is the one and only the purpose of all of the “-isms” [feminism, racism, transgenderism, ManBearPigism, you-name-it-ism]: The destruction and the eradication and the annihilation of White People and their White Civilization.

      All by design.

      And all proceeding exactly according to schedule.

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 1:36 am whiskeysplace

        Unlikely, far below replacement fertility and massive outmarriage signal that they are eating their own cooking. This is all the flaw within the West from the start … outbreeding, weak kin feeling.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 2:18 am Subway Masturbator

        Zombie Brain, I’m sure you’re great at your insurance agent job, and it sounds pretty cool when you portentously declare that Frankfurterism is the end, and I’m sure the State Dept or NASA will call you real soon to straighten everything out, but you kind of sound like an idiot since you never define exactly what physical things the Frankfurters do. Not the ideas they espouse, or what you claim they’re going to cause fer sure in the future, but a physically observable action.

        OK? Go.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 5:06 am ho

        Are you really denying that Jews are essentially shitting all over western civ?

        Yeah, he seems like a weirdo for constantly referring to the School, but it isn’t exactly a lie.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 2:21 pm Director

        I’m not sure an anonymous Muslim is going help western civ either M’ Ho Med.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 8:59 am PDA

        Subway Masturbator.

        The Frankfrut School’s intention was to subvert and co-opt academia, specifically through the social sciences, what they termed ‘the long march through the institutions’. The idea was to change the mental life of Western populations so that they would be more amenable to the introduction of Marxism.

        Members were extremely influential in sociology, anthropology and especially psychology, laying theoretical foundations that are accepted, used and built upon to this day.

        At a bare minimum these theoretical foundations shape the way in which graduates of the social sciences view and interact with the world. The social science faculties are primarily incubators and dispensers of Marxist thought.

        This thought is disseminated in a variety of ways – from lowbrow populism, to graduates entering think tanks, to graduates entering the bureaucracy, to graduates entering the mainstream media. I personally graduated from this system with flying colors.

        The Frankfurt School gave us a number of extremely powerful social movements that have literally reconfigured the cultural landscape in the span of decades – political correctness and sexual liberation to name but two. They also shaped the way the entire field of theoretical psychology thinks about mental disease, power and the interplay of the two.

        Any stupid idea you hear spewed out of the mouth of a leftoid originated in a university. You must understand that drone level leftoids are incapable of thinking for themselves, they are the true believers of our age – they are simply not capable of generating original ideas. What they do is believe, and believe with hysterical fervor.

        So what the Frankfurt School actually did (or does – I am not sure you can separate the Frankfurt School from social sciences and the liberal arts in a meaningful away anymore ) is they construct the religious dogma that liberals and progressives upload. They are the high priests of the Marxist religion.

        The Frankfurt School was itself a vector for the disease of Marxism and not the fundamental cause. It is just one of the easiest vectors to trace and its methods were expounded quite openly. Ultimately these people were funded, and those who funded them frequently shared their intentions but were not formal members of the school.

        My own personal jury is out on who owns the ground this church was built on, but there you have it.

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 7:29 pm corvinus

        It’s my impression that it’s actually the brainwashed whites (whether h0m0 or not) who are far more formidable enemies than the “chimpanzees and armadillos”, just behind the YKWs themselves. The C&A are simply reliable votes for 0bama.

        LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 11:02 pm FamilyMan

      As it happens, the same EO that requires businesses to report more data on pay by sex also requires more data on pay by race. It’s pay by race and sex.

      Perhaps CH chose to leave that out to focus the debate on gender rather than racial issues. Sorry CH, well not really all that sorry.

      LikeLike


      • on April 12, 2014 at 4:56 am thwack

        Nobody is forcing white people to identify themselves as “white”.

        LikeLike


  17. on April 8, 2014 at 5:33 pm TLM

    The pay gap should be defined as what you’ll pay to stuff your meat into that gap between her legs. less is better.

    LikeLike


  18. on April 8, 2014 at 5:44 pm Arbiter

    And, procedural note, managerialism is likely not the ultimate source of feminism; that dishonor more likely belongs to genetic changes brought on by NW European excessive outbreeding.

    No. All the founders of feminism are YKWs, just like the media owners who promote them and forbid exposing their lies. Andrea Dworkin, Betty Friedan, Susan Sontag, Naomi Wolf – these are not Germanics. They are not even of our race.

    There are insane egalitarians in every generation of every people, of course, but they are always few. They never got anywhere and kept their mouths shut, until they had a powerful ally in the YKW.

    With household chores no longer a full-time job thanks to White (mostly the NW Europeans you mention, by the way) man’s electricity and technology, it was inevitable that women would start working, and naturally some new problems would arise, as always when there is change. But these would have been overcome, had it not been for the YKW exploiting the situation, using conflict to demonize men as a group. And then creating ever more conflict – using homosexuality for example – when men had given in to the first demands.

    Just like their tribal brethren had done when illiterate peasants moved to the cities en masse to work in factories, and couldn’t understand why those strange men with glasses got paid more when they were only sitting by a desk and writing strange things in papers.

    LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 3:24 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      This whole ‘the Jooos did it’ mentality is tiring. The Jews didn’t win any wars to become influential in our world. They were a despised minority that lived in ghettos. Just because your forefathers were stupid asses who decided handing out citizenship like it’s nothing is a good idea and later exported this way of thinking around the world, it doesn’t mean the Jews are to blame.

      Secondly, can you tell me three Jewish feminists from the first wave feminism? Because those were the founders of feminism.

      [CH: The more accurate equation isn’t “the jooos did it”, its “the jooos had a disproportionate role in doing it”. why is this so hard for people to understand?]

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 5:28 am ho

        Jews didn’t win wars? Ever heard of WW2?

        Also, Jews were powerful bankers, scientists, academics, journalists, businessmen, publishers etc. This is a lot of influence.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 12:21 pm Director

        Re you a Muslim btw?

        I was shocked at your reaction to my Muslim baiting.

        Wtf dude?

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 6:49 am Director

        You should familiarize yourself with the things that actually happened in Eastern Europe before the holocaust, rather than swallow the “oy poor me in the ghetto” sob story.

        The Jews in Eastern Europe lived like princes and had the loyalty of the Emperors and Kings.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 8:01 am The badgers of the Continuity IRA

        No they did nt do nuffin, what was communism but a Jewish power grab, from Karl Marx the “genius” who founded it and the first soviet government that was 80% of the tribe, all funded courtesy of B,nai Brith and good old boy Jacob Schilf he of Rothschild fame, it was a crime to be anti semitic in Soviet Russia yet Churches and clergy were fair game, 60 million Russians murdered from 1917 to 1957 which you would know if you had read your Alexander Solzhenitsyn, also a little matter of the Holodomor a forgotten genocide of maybe 10 million Ukrainian peasants, but, they were only small holders not chosen by the Creator of the Cosmos, so it don’t matter.
        And judging by the non white immigration in every white country pushed by them, it seems that genocide is encoded in their DNA.

        LikeLike


  19. on April 8, 2014 at 6:07 pm Scray

    How can you guys keep focused on this stuff?

    [CH: big brains.]

    I mean good on ya’ll.
    My mind is just constantly getting blown by raw female sexuality.

    [mine too. although the blast radius has kinda worn off the mind blowing at this point.]

    Go to pick 8 up for coffee or watever at her office, end up doing some yayo, getting blown in a chair and then banging in view of a little baby in a stroller in the hallway (open blinds on the door….)….

    [the things i’ve seen…]

    also getting crazy-eyed ‘don’t fuck around on me….I’ll find out…..and you won’t like what happens…’ while getting oral is…..insane.

    [i prefer the backward head tilt while drfiting into pleasureville.]

    wasn’t the dancer either. this is the girl I was lying to months ago lol. wtf.
    “Act Like You’ve Been There Before” should be a cardinal rule.

    [“act as if” “act like you’ve been there” “fake it till you make it” all variations on the same theme.]

    Because a lot of these adventures have me in my mind going ‘are you fucking serious? I’m doing this? This is happening?’

    liiiiike….why do you guys even want a prim proper virginal-ish girl?

    [tight is right.]

    They suck in comparison. Dogshit. The worst. Never looking back.

    [we’ll have to agree to disagree.]

    Att: Zombie Shane
    Application of IQ to game —> picking which desk in the office to fuck on. Which ones can bear the right of weight, allow the greatest flexibility in position, allow the right amounts of force, and are at the right height.

    [standing fuckstation.]

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 7:23 pm Scray

      Ya well I’m still relatively new, cut me some slack.

      LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 7:38 pm cryo

      The best is getting a prim proper girl to unleash her whore with you. Your game isn’t tight enough yet so you’re slumming it with indiscrete sluts pretending that it’s all good. You’ll get there though.

      LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 8:41 pm gunslingergregi

        game got to be pretty fucking tight to change ho’s into angels he he he
        my dick is better than crack
        now that is some head blowing up shit

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 8:45 pm Scray

        lmao

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 8:45 pm Scray

        Mmmmhm shure.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 9:25 pm Scray

        I only say that because the assumption is that I haven’t been in the other situation too. My point here is that being with these extroverted broads….who knows, maybe they have BPD….or maybe they’re a little crazy, I can’t say….just…kinda always puts me on my game. Whatever I did yesterday, I’ll have to outdo today. I’m always thinking of how to be even tighter.

        Idk, I don’t really get that when the girl is just blown away by my awesomeness and hasn’t seen/done much or whatever, even if she -is- down. Is that slumming it, to you?

        It ain’t like I’m marrying anybody atm.

        LikeLike


      • on April 8, 2014 at 11:12 pm FamilyMan

        Well I guess if the main sexual activity is her giving you head, and she has acceptable oral hygiene and no mouth sores, you can get a good benefit / cost ratio from a girl with expertise.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 6:30 am YaReally

        “The best is getting a prim proper girl to unleash her whore with you.”

        It’s overrated to me. I’ve been with enough virgins to now disqualify them and actively avoid them lol I have better things to do than invest a bunch of time baby-stepping a virgin through sex and disarming all her hang-ups. I think half the guys that want to “teach a virgin” just get off on the power trip more than the actual sex lol but hey, to each their own.

        “Because it’s easy to teach a girl to give great head”

        I disagree. Unless your standards for head are pretty low lol And even then you’re rolling the dice that the girl is going to actually enjoy giving head. A girl who LOVES sucking cock and can’t keep her mouth off your dick is 1000x better than a virgin scrunching her face up as she finishes you with her hand scared you’re going to get jizz in her hair until you teach her to pretend to enjoy it knowing that she really doesn’t. I’ll pass on that shit lol

        “Because a lot of these adventures have me in my mind going ‘are you fucking serious? I’m doing this? This is happening?’”

        Welcome to the game lol If this isn’t happening to you regularly, you aren’t pushing your comfort zone. I don’t even bother telling buddies the details of what I get up to because it’s way too far outside their reality to even believe me lol

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 8:25 am Simon Corso

        ” A girl who LOVES sucking cock and can’t keep her mouth off your dick is 1000x better than a virgin scrunching her face up as she finishes you with her hand scared you’re going to get jizz in her hair until you teach her to pretend to enjoy it knowing that she really doesn’t. I’ll pass on that shit lol ”

        Training a girl for BJ’s is a freaking ordeal. But totally worth it…once you get the teethmarks off your dick.

        Anyway I tend to assume most men have attuned whor-dar like I do. Sluts have tells, and that’s why I tend towards the ( seemingly ) prim and proper types. Not that I’m hunting virgins, but if we’re going to be in public together I want a girl who at least appears to have some dignity.

        That old feminist argument that game only works on bar sluts ? I was getting bar sluts with zero game. I learned game so I could pull,and keep, a better class of woman.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 9:00 am Scray

        I don’t believe this. These chicks sniff out weakness. I think it’s the other way around, to be honest. The less experienced chicks seem to be completely bowled over by game (which means that non-game will work). The ones who are more of a challenge to get under thumb are the so-called ‘ruined’ women.

        And honestly, I don’t really want to have to train anyone. Just come to me pre-made.

        Seems like fear, tbh.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 9:26 am Simon Corso

        Arguments like that make me think you’re a feminist mole tbh.

        Someday you may want a girl you could take home to mama.
        Someday you may want to be sure the children you’re raising are actually yours.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 10:19 am Scray

        For some reason you believe that these women are incapable of acting prim and proper in front of mom. For some reason you also believe that these women are incapable of being faithful to a high value man.

        Promiscuous != slut. Sexually adventurous != slut. But ya atm I’m not thinking that far ahead.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 10:59 am YaReally

        “For some reason you believe that these women are incapable of acting prim and proper in front of mom. For some reason you also believe that these women are incapable of being faithful to a high value man. ”

        This. Guys who think a girl who can be slutty in bed can’t put a fucking bow in her hair and impress their mom usually only have experience with the hardcore low-quality bar sluts and don’t really realize there’s a middle ground of girls that you would never expect to be slutty because they seem classy, who are fucking wild when you create a non-judgemental environment for them.

        It’s like guys picture some chick sitting down at the dinner table going “Wow, Mrs. YaReally, this meal looks almost as delicious as the big black dicks I love to take up my ass!!!!!” Fucking cartoon stereotypes. Go out more and meet some real women lol

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 11:51 am FamilyMan

        OK go ahead and think it’s fear. Different strokes for different folks.

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 5:43 pm Scray

        ‘OK go ahead and think it’s fear. Different strokes for different folks.’

        What else do you think it could be? Even if you want to go cite stats about pair-bonding, etc. that indeed is a type of fear — “I am afraid that her ability to commit/be satisfied is adversely affected.”

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 9:16 am Mukluk

        How old are you? Where are you meeting these virgins?

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 11:02 am YaReally

        Early 30s, and all over. I’ve had young virgins (under 21) and older virgins (mid/late 20s). The older ones usually had some kind of bad experience with sex (usually rape) when they were young and have a shit-ton of unwiring to do to get them to be comfortable with sex. The young ones don’t have a clue wtf they’re doing and are huge fucking projects to teach and not worth the effort to me because it’s not like being a virgin magically makes them quality girlfriend/mother/relationship material in all other aspects.

        Fuck a few of them and you realize they’re just like any other girls.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 11:20 am Scray

        Yes x 1000. idk more and more convinced that not caring about this stuff is a huge edge in the game, judging by how many commenters here are all scurred.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 11:22 am CH

        not caring can be plausibly faked.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 1:25 pm no

        ..virgins can be loyal..that’s the upside…

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 10:35 am cryo

        @yareally. I hear you. I don’t really believe a girl when she tells me she’s a virgin anyway. I just like getting the “good girls” to be sluts in bed. Its the difference between anal with Peaches Geldof and anal with the Orbit Gum Girl.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 11:08 am Scray

        Okay…so you don’t believe them when they tell you that they’re a virgin…but you believe that you’re the first person that they’re ‘whoring it up’ with?

        And…I mean, I’d smash Peaches (RIP) and the Orbitz girl….so….I mean….idk wat the diff is.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 11:11 am CH

        remember that there’s a difference between “i’d smash” and “i’d wife up”. the latter has more stringent selection criteria.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 11:26 am Scray

        ya this is tru. this could all be a function of the ‘not committing to anyone’ phase of life

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 1:28 pm no

        ..so then ch…you would say that a married 9 is better than an unmarried 9….is there a loyalty gene…

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 11:58 am Amy

        “I just like getting the “good girls” to be sluts in bed.”

        This gets lost quickly in these threads, because in many minds including YaReally’s there are only two categories: virgin madonnas and promiscuous whores who travel the world for gangbangs. Nothing in between.

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 4:18 pm Director

        http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clara_Zetkin

        Feminism and the bloodiest revolution in history.

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 4:33 pm Amy

        Ummm… thanks? There’s nothing in there that even suggests she was responsible for starting WWI. You’re a little squirrelly on this topic.

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 4:40 pm cryo

        Where do attention whores who troll male internet communities fall on that spectrum? 😉

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 5:48 pm Scray

        what good girls. I still don’t understand this whole shebang really. It just seems to be an extension of this mythical virgin hunt — I wanna be the first guy to slap my dick on her forehead, I wanna be the first guy to fuck her in public, etc. etc.

        As if that were some sort of insurance.
        When the love leaves, she will forget all of that….

        LikeLike


      • on April 11, 2014 at 8:29 am Amy

        Lol. Not traveling the world for gangbangs frees up a lot of time.

        LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 3:19 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      Because it’s easy to teach a girl to give great head while it’s not easy to teach a whore to be good for anything more than emptying your sack.

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 5:48 am Hugh G. Rection

        You can take a whore out of the whorehouse but you can never take the whorehouse out of a whore. Verified by science™.

        LikeLike


  20. on April 8, 2014 at 6:11 pm Cad and Bounder

    The essence of the problem is that feminism suits the interest of the elite male. Forget arguing with women, they are onto an easy ride with feminism. It’s the elite male that should be named and shamed.

    His son obtains a relatively higher value, because other men’s sons are deprived of resources, while his son is looked after, because of the social network of the father.

    Feminism also ensures that his daughter starts on the hypergamy ladder from a higher base, rather than running the risk of her ending up with ‘bring the movies’ guy.

    The problem for the elite male is that this sick game is going to end when young men without means, start getting the tangible opportunity to live in countries that don’t subject him to this kind of manipulation.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 7:08 pm Director

      Name the top 10 men that it suits.

      More Cohencidences.

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 1:10 am cad and bounder

        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/the-modern-corporate-harem/

        A useful demonstration of the dynamics at play.

        At some point, some eastern European country –please let it be Russia for the laugh factor– is going to turn up at leading Western STEM focused universities with a PowerPoint demonstration, and convince the brightest graduates to go and live in a country and culture that values them.

        It ought to take about 5 mins.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 11:39 am gunslingergregi

        I said that a long time ago

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 11:40 am gunslingergregi

        was saying china though guaranteed you get to raise your kids and they can’t be taken away would already be a pretty big deal

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 12:16 pm Director

        Yep.

        Blondes, a sea of Blondes…

        Some spec ops guys I know have migrated to Prague btw.

        LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 11:21 pm FamilyMan

      Anyone with a passport and the ability to speak or learn Spanish can go live in cheaper countries with better climate and better social climate as well. That includes a lot of men. Spanish, it is absolutely the easiest language on the planet! It’s worth learning for the great winter vacation opportunities alone, and if you’re willing to slum a bit in “multicultural” settings, they are giving away the training for free. Men have the ability to do this now. Why are more not doing it? As Director opined a couple posts ago, maybe it’s lack of drive or spirit of adventure.

      I don’t get the argument about feminism preserving desirable (and goy?) females for the young Jewish men. I don’t see it happening for one thing. For another, if those men are doing well financially with all their connections, they’ll get choice pussy anyway. For a third, Jewish culture (rejecting these ill influences more effectively than more-targeted populations) is very traditional, and even the young Jewish girls are surely being corrupted.

      LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 3:17 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      Why do you think other countries would allow the dregs of America to move there? Sure, I wouldn’t mind rich Americans and rich corporations moving to my country, but unless you bring good enough women to trade for the women here and actually bring a benefit to this country, I don’t want you here. Somehow you think your country shouldn’t get immigration, but that you are an exceptional case and should be allowed to waltz around the world in other people’s countries. This manipulation occurs everywhere. Get over it: rich people have it better and it’s how life is everywhere.

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 8:45 am FamilyMan

        Many Americans that are barely middle class can qualify for immigration in these countries.

        Maybe it’s not how it should be or how you think it should be. But it’s the way it is and not about to change next week either.

        Seems odd to me that you have a negative reaction to a positive situation for American men.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 12:14 pm Director

        Pj is a commissar like former manager of shoe factory in Kiev.

        There is no escaping your tax enslavement as far as he is concerned.

        LikeLike


  21. on April 8, 2014 at 6:33 pm AlphaBeta

    Pay gap? I’ll just leave this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson%27s_paradox#Berkeley_gender_bias_case

    LikeLike


  22. on April 8, 2014 at 7:35 pm Grim

    CH, THANK YOU for what you do.

    Sadly, all is lost. The average man is completely brainwashed and taken in. Over the last year, I have shared your website with dozens of men, and 98% of them react the same as a puffed ho woman! In other words, they call me crazy, hate me, call this website crazy, and are far far far far far far far away from getting it.

    Just today I shared some key posts from this blog with a group of guitar playing rednecks. These are Vietnam vet type people who normally would vote Republican and listen to and the play classic rock from the 1970s. Even these so-called conservatives are completely brainwashed by feminism and called me a sexist for pointing out perfectly normal things that all of us see here know.

    Of course, these are the same loser boomer betas who were hippies and gave feminism its victory.

    LikeLike


  23. on April 8, 2014 at 7:44 pm A Giddy Reminder Of The Evil Influence Of Feminism | Reaction Times

    […] By CH […]

    LikeLike


  24. on April 8, 2014 at 7:48 pm Alexander Irwin

    Equality for men _would_ be a step up; “No” above got it backwards. Pay for unmarried childless women is 108% of all men:

    http://content.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html

    LikeLike


  25. on April 8, 2014 at 7:55 pm MR.G

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again:

    Simply put:

    “Feminism was invented for the sole purpose of driving a wedge between White Western Man and White Western Woman in order to undermine and destroy White Western Civilization”

    LikeLike


  26. on April 8, 2014 at 7:57 pm Moonchild

    “They suffer, consumers suffer, government efficiency (such as it is) suffers. Social distrust leeches into every facet of life. And, in the THX-amplified CH-widescreen picture, lower male wages undermine the marriage market.”

    Guess who doesn’t suffer??? Thaaaaaats right! Its the Frankfurt School!! It’s the YKW parasites finally successfully destroying their hosts after centuries of being expelled from every society they ever attempted to “set up shop” in!!

    LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 2:24 am Subway Masturbator

      Moonchild indeed. Why are you ashamed of simply saying you view Jews as parasites?
      And don’t tell me about the filters again.

      Awarded poster of Mustache boy, plastic coated to resist staining by your ejaculate.

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 2:25 am Subway Masturbator

        Oh, and don’t forget to thank the Jew who invented the Polio vaccine that you have a virtually 100% chance of being able to walk, you ungrateful moron.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 3:12 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

        With that line of reasoning, Jews should be the ones thanking Europeans for devising and developing mathematics and chemistry enough to enable them to do shit because otherwise they’d be camel fucking fruitcakes like their Arabic cousins.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 5:30 am ho

        Arabs fuck camels?

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 5:32 am ho

        You know, the uncanniness of you replying to everyone who mentions kikes is….well, uncanny.

        I knew that the JIDF posted on /pol/, but here?

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 6:18 am Director

        You can’t escape the Bergwitz Traitorsteins of Lemberg.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 6:55 am Director

        Thank you for the vaccine Mr Frankenstein

        http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nxxSIX3fmmo

        Mary Shelley was Jew aware.

        LikeLike


  27. on April 8, 2014 at 8:03 pm FuriousFerret

    “To these men, white knighting comes naturally because they don’t see any direct line from the easygoing women in their own lives to the feminist assault on innate sex differences and, ultimately, on Western civilization.”

    You also have to remember that have another big reason to hide their head in the sand. They have daughters.

    Most fathers know deep down in their hearts how slutty women can be and how ‘liberated’ they are today but the horror of imaging their own flesh and blood princess being stuffed by Tyrone sends their mind into denial mode. So they either deny that most women are sloots or they believe that all OTHER women are sloots but not his precious.

    LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 6:41 am Carlos Danger

      But an alpha father knows what the potential for whoredom is for his little precious and takes steps accordingly.

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 4:15 pm FuriousFerret

        Like what putting her in a convent?

        It’s just wishful thinking that parenting can overcome culture most of the time. Even with the right move your daughter will probably turn out to be a sloot. Deal with it.

        LikeLike


  28. on April 8, 2014 at 8:24 pm The Tasteful Thickness

    Obama never misses an opportunity for political advantage, the facts of the issue have no bearing. He’s done it over and over again with race and sex. He constantly misrepresents the right and cartoonishly impugns their motives. He carps that they have no ideas of their own while, his flunky in the Senate indefinitely tables their bills.

    His own weasel of a press secretary patiently explained away the “gender pay gap” of median wages within his own administration. Carney was right, it’s bullshit that disappears under scrutiny. Even after this, the President of the United States still steps up to microphones and tries to tar Republicans with a median wage “gender pay gap”.

    I don’t know how any self respecting person can still support someone who is so utterly, blatantly and audaciously full of shit. Do they think it’s cute? Is it all a game to them?

    LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 3:08 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      Why support the other guys though? They’re just a bunch of whores who sell political favor for money from corporations. There’s a reason why the GOP wants immigration too. The only people who actually stand to benefit from the GOP policies are corporations and the rich.

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 2:06 pm markgm28

        The GOP aren’t the only other guys.

        LikeLike


  29. on April 8, 2014 at 9:13 pm Dude

    Oh, for f—‘s sake. Over 50 years ago:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Pay_Act_of_1963

    LikeLike


  30. on April 8, 2014 at 9:31 pm The Railer

    Here’s the game : “equal pay” but only women can sue. So if you’re an employer, what do you do? You pay women MORE so that their salaries fall outside the margin of error/variance/etc, to deny Osama and the parasites a pretext to take your company.

    In my world, engineering (often with Government customers), women are paid MORE, about 10% by my reckoning, for their shorter hours and lower skills. To tilt the scales furthur, big firms prematurely promote women beyond their abilities which leads to a poisonous and obsessively petty political work environment (they spend all their time covering up their incompetence, not getting the job done, which they don’t know how to do). So you have a frustrated group of potentially competent male doers being misdirected by a bunch of girrrrrrrrlllll power empty skirts. At some level the women know that they didn’t earn it, which just makes them even more insecure and paranoid.

    The Taliban will fix all of this after our inevitable surrender.

    LikeLike


    • on April 8, 2014 at 11:41 pm FamilyMan

      This agrees with my experience long ago in engineering. But it’s good to hear that the women are insecure now. When I was there they were just coming into power and didn’t have enough female managers to crack down on the female underlings (nobody else dares to do it).

      Also right about who can sue. The same principle applies to equal pay vs. US worker protection against hiring cheaper foreigners. Foreigners have a right to sue if they are not being paid equally with US citizens. But US citizens don’t have a right to sue if the employer is bringing in or continuing H1B for cheaper less qualified foreigners. It’s illegal but only the government can sue. So in the typical case, the foreigner is working cheap, and he knows he’s better off not suing. The American knows he’s getting screwed because of the damned cheap foreigners, it’s easily documented, but he has no legal right to sue.

      I am not kidding, that is literally the law.

      LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 3:04 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      I simply don’t understand why men keep working hard. I do make fun of guys who waste their lives playing video games, but if all you do is go to work to keep dumb sluts fed(either at the office or at home), quitting, telling everyone to fuck themselves and playing video games makes sense. Heck, sell the house and travel.

      LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 8:18 am Wilson

      10% won’t be enough, they’ll never stop making demands, and will probably still sue claiming to be paid less than they deserve because they are valued less as women abstractly, even if the numbers show they are the highest paid employees. A new workplace harassment epidemic will be manufactured to silence opposition. They’ll demand government wage control at all levels to reduce “economic inequality”, and the government will eventually have to seize all private companies before they collapse.

      LikeLike


  31. on April 8, 2014 at 10:16 pm Mavwreck

    And, procedural note, managerialism is likely not the ultimate source of feminism; that dishonor more likely belongs to genetic changes brought on by NW European excessive outbreeding.

    Please explain – how does outbreeding connect to feminism?

    [CH: outbreeding -> universalism, which is the umbrella morality of feminism.]

    LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 3:00 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      It probably doesn’t. It’s simply an offshoot of Enlightenment values. For example, women getting the vote is as preposterous as most men having it because most men don’t meet adequate criteria such as being versed enough in how politics work and being invested in the system and paying into it(having children and being net taxpayers). Even more idiotic isn’t only releasing your slaves on your own territory, but also making the former slaves citizens. That’s ensuring you will always have a large component of your population that actively despises you and who will be a permanent reminder of your transgressions.

      America has always been the incubator of idiotic ideas. Socialism and left wing ideals/cultural Marxist ideals(the US constitution is left wing in a historical perspective) are as American as apple pie. What baffles me is why so few people miss the fact that the anti-aristocracy and anti-monarchy movements had exactly the same meta-narrative as Marxists and even the rhetoric is fairly similar. You simply have a different client class(working class for Marxism and the bourgeoisie for republican liberalism) and a different class that is being pathologized(aristocracy or bourgeoisie). All these left wing ideologies work like this and once you buy the assumptions of one, the rest will follow logically.

      To illustrate this: if you’re for freedom and equality among men because oppression is bad, it follows that if women aren’t free and equal because they’re oppressed, we need change.

      LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 5:42 am thwack

        That’s ensuring you will always have a large component of your population that actively despises you and who will be a permanent reminder of your transgressions.
        —————————————————————————————————–

        So keeping them enslaved is better?

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 7:12 am Director

        Better than what?

        Extermination?

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 8:22 am thwack

        before or after your extinction?

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 12:11 pm Director

        Before or after there is a black state populated with a comparable lifestyle to the first world?

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 3:59 pm thwack

        Before or after black people (and mexcrement) are dragged over in chains from the 3rd world to populate your first world state?

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 9:11 am Dat_Truth_Hurts

        The best solution would have been a boat ticket back to the paradise-on-Earth known as Africa. That is where black nations continue to flourish and push humanity forward.

        LikeLike


      • on April 9, 2014 at 12:12 pm Director

        Over a cliff!

        LikeLike


      • on April 10, 2014 at 4:01 pm thwack

        You guys kill your own babies, but all you do is whine about ni66ers and mexicants.

        LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 5:38 am ho

      Look at countries where cousin marriage is banned or has been banned for a long time. All absolute left wing countries.

      The more you outbreed, the most you tend to have altruism not related to your in group. The more you inbreed the more you tend to focus your altruism on your ingroup.

      LikeLike


    • on April 10, 2014 at 7:34 pm corvinus

      The key, I guess, is to fight the right balance between idiot leftoid equalist universalism and inbred dune coon clannishness. Problem is, most people don’t tend to know who their fourth cousins are, and would probably think it weird to start a matchmaking service along those lines.

      LikeLike


  32. on April 8, 2014 at 10:53 pm dick fuel

    flynn effect = test writers getting dumber

    au>2000usd = bulletproof vest time

    LikeLike


  33. on April 9, 2014 at 1:44 am whiskeysplace

    In kin networks ie min outbreeding place far more restrictions on women socially and trade off individual freedom for collective security. See China or the ME. Europe was too thinly populated for collective kin security bc there were never enough kin. So you had more altruistic, moral based outbreeding giving women choice thus power thus feminism and other gnostic problems.

    LikeLike


  34. on April 9, 2014 at 1:58 am Hoss

    Off topic a bit – but I have noticed a greater proportion of lesbian porn available on the free porn channels lately. Is this because it is getting more popular or does it reflect a greater percentage of females watching?

    LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 6:47 am Carlos Danger

      It’s cheaper to make and a lot of men like it too.

      LikeLike


  35. on April 9, 2014 at 6:36 am PA

    What is a good, short, SFW response to the 77% lie?

    Other than “it’s not true if type of profession, years of experience, and overtime are factored in.”

    LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 6:44 am Carlos Danger

      It’s a lie.

      LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 9:13 am Dat_Truth_Hurts

      If that were true, every company would hire nothing but women.

      LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 9:16 am Aaron

      Not so short and the website isn’t SFW but maybe you could use this come up with your own condensed boilerplate:

      5 Reasons Why The Gender Pay Gap Is Bogus

      There are also a couple of youtubes that don’t have as much info but have the benefit of being short and sweet. They both bunt on the gender differences but I suppose that is part of what makes them safe.

      LikeLike


  36. on April 9, 2014 at 7:55 am Just Saying

    I have several companies, and I wanted to have these types of numbers for when the government comes knocking. Every worker that has voluntarily reduced their hours, and likewise their pay, are women. Not 1 man has EVER gone from a 40+ hour work week, to a 32 hour work week – NOT ONE! (That is from over 600 people – in several companies over 10 years. Yes, I was amazed.) Yes, the women all have all sorts of reasons for it – but there are men who are doing the same things – one has a daughter that he cares for since his wife abrogated her responsibilities for the child, and every man that does this “makes up” the hours. Yes, we work with them because good people are hard to find, but women are much quicker to reduce hours, and you’re lucky to get them to work the minimum number of hours they sign up to work.

    Women get paid less, because they work less. If they want to be paid more, then they should work the same amount as men – but that will NEVER happen.

    Oh, and we give the hourly rates for our people – so it shows their rate not only their “yearly” earnings, and on average the women earn MORE in any technical field if you look at their hourly rate – because they have more offers, and more opportunities due to these inane laws… Do they earn more in a given year? No – why? Because in any given year they are taking more Leave-without-pay than any of the men – and these are women NOT on reduced work weeks, they have used up all of their vacation and other hours and take LWOP – of course the government doesn’t like to “muddy” a good story with the truth of the issue…

    LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 8:26 am Wilson

      Doesn’t matter, you must guarantee equality of outcome. Women are worth the same as men, probably more if they are taking time off from work to help their families, so you must pay them the same income, and are strongly advised to pay them more.

      LikeLike


    • on April 9, 2014 at 9:14 am Mukluk

      If women actually were being paid 80 cents on the dollar for the same work, any sane entrepreneur would just hire dozens of women and the labor market would quickly correct itself.

      LikeLike


  37. on April 9, 2014 at 9:16 am Opus

    Empowered Women means more Sluts, less marriage – enjoy the decline.

    LikeLike


  38. on April 9, 2014 at 12:21 pm Ronin

    [at the minimum] Women in Media jobs in NYC in their 20s already make more than their male counterparts.

    +Not to mention all of the Models in town, too.

    I wonder how many women wrote or emailed in to correct the President on this error in his talking-points?

    LikeLike


  39. on April 9, 2014 at 12:57 pm ray

    “To these men, white knighting comes naturally because they don’t see any direct line from the easygoing women in their own lives to the feminist assault on innate sex differences and, ultimately, on Western civilization.”

    Exactly. These “men” are everywhere, I see them all the time, head safely in sand… the married ones are usually little more than servant-boys of their wives. Wealthy dying empires like America breed these locust un-men.

    These guys don’t WANT to see the consequences of feminism. Destructive lies about Paycheck Fairness are permitted to continue, decade after decade. They are OK with fem-government lies as long as they don’t see themselves immediately and negatively impacted. They are a LOT more interested in money money money than the conseqences to Mere Other Men of the western gynarchies. Some have wives and daughters who have benefitted tremendously from fifty years of matriarchy, and these un-men likewise benefitted secondarily from feminism.

    The women in their lives are only “easygoing” as long as hubby/whiteknight continues in obedience to her and the gynogulag. The moment that he — or you — stray from assigned subjugation, her easygoingness will disappear and you will come into contact with the endless “laws” and policies and Protectors and institutions that exist to enforce her will.

    LikeLike


  40. on April 10, 2014 at 1:48 am A Giddy Reminder Of The Evil Influence Of Femin...

    […] For those optimists who don’t think lying liars and the mendacious ideas they propagate matter, President Barry Kenyatta-Downlow Obama today signed two executive orders addressing the so-called “sex pay gap” myth that feminists have been…  […]

    LikeLike


  41. on April 10, 2014 at 3:42 pm Director

    The Lady behind the International Women’s Day

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clara_Zetkin

    That directly corresponds to the February Revolution in St Petersburg

    LikeLike


  42. on April 12, 2014 at 4:56 pm iamolson

    Forgive me if I’m late to the party with this insight, but GUISE. SRSLY. GUISE:

    Feminism. It’s one GIANT, multi-generational shit test. Weeds out the chumps and betas while also creating financial and social benefits for the female gender on a national scale.

    LikeLike


    • on April 12, 2014 at 5:37 pm AKA

      No shit. So what’s the answer Karnak?

      LikeLike


      • on April 12, 2014 at 9:32 pm Anonymous

        I was hoping for some sort of prize just for stating the problem.

        But, since you asked…perhaps auto-immolation en masse, leaving a world of only women behind. This would be a cruel and lasting punishment, and the choral wail of “where are all the good men?!” would be that much more sad.

        LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Davy Holmes on Sweden, The Cuck Corner Stool…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    jOHN MOSBY on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    cortesar on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Alex the Goon on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    jOHN MOSBY on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Alex the Goon on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Lichthof on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
    • Deep State Update: Keeping It In The Family For A Reason
    • This Is What Separate Dating Markets Are For (Or: White Vs Black Thirst)
    • The NPC Song: "Feel"
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: