• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Reader Mailbag: The Ballad Of Heartbreaker Hal
Feminine Woman Of The Month »

Social Distrust Is Way Up Among Millennials

April 19, 2014 by CH

As reported by NPR (I’m sure with gritted teeth), a Pew Study finds

that the milliennial generation has a low level of social trust. There are several possible causes for this distrust, including a skewed social media culture and a faltering economy. […]

One explanation for this, the study suggests, is growing racial diversity – 43 percent of millennial adults are non-white, making this the most diverse generation in America.

Holy macaroni! Is the SPWL stronghold of NPR about to grapple with the CH aphorism “diversity + proximity = war“?

She says, minority groups have long had low levels of social trust.

CAMILLE LEAK: I think that, ultimately, it stems from their history of having to deal with persecution and discrimination, whether in their personal lives or within the business setting. […]

Leak suggests that the Internet itself is another reason millennials are so distrustful.

LEAK: I mean, there’s a reason why catfish is now a verb.

Ah, no. This being NPR, leftoid headquarters, the bleeding obvious escapes them. Social distrust can’t be up because diversity is making the full court press and severing ethnocentric communal bonds. No no, it has to be white privilege, persecution, or the internet. Hey guess what? I’ll add another theory to the mix that’s no less nebulous and unfalsifiable than the catch-all assertion of white privilege: Dissembling media leftoids are causing the rise in social distrust.

So who’s the one in five that says, yeah, people can be trusted? Sara Bakken’s one of them. She lives in South Dakota. She says, if she were to meet someone on the street, chances are, she could trust them.

South Dakota is 84% white, 21% higher than the national average.

Camille Leak says, low levels of social trust shouldn’t be mistaken for a pessimistic world view.

LEAK: It’s just being savvy and being realistic, and I think that’s what it is for a lot of millennials. It’s not about being optimistic or pessimistic. It’s about being realistic.

Do Millennials strike you as hard-headed realists? Maybe they are when they aren’t whining about microaggressions or the patriarchy or extolling the artistry of anime.

Despite this lack of trust, the study says, the millennial generation is the most upbeat about the future of the country.

“The basis of optimism is sheer terror.”
– Oscar Wilde

There was one other interesting tidbit to come out of the study:

Within the millennial generation in particular, multicultural consumers have a much higher level of influence on their non-Hispanic white counterparts. So we’re seeing that even outside of areas like trust, non-Hispanic white millennials have begun to adopt certain multicultural [sic] behaviors or characteristics.

Translation: A drop of wine into sewage makes sewage. A drop of sewage into wine makes sewage.

Diversity + proximity = war. Keep saying it leftoids, until your heads explode scanners-style.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Biomechanics is God, Culture, Globalization, Goodbye America | 300 Comments

300 Responses

  1. on April 19, 2014 at 10:51 am Dragases

    I’ve gone further than social distrust in my evolution.

    I used to be a God fearing conservative patriot. I don’t feel any attachment towards my nation anymore. If our elites see fit to give away and carve out the soul of this country, then I shall nary lift a finger to defend it if it’s attacked. Only useful idiot neocons are the ones trying to extract political advantage from a died-out nationalism from long ago.

    I see myself now as being of French White European descent. I visited France last year, and I felt a strong feeling of kinship and attachment with the people there. While my French was rather broken, I think the people I spoke to were generally happy to receive one of their diaspora. I felt an incredible amount of love and pride for the achievements of that great nation that I was descended from. France may have creeping multicult, but it is not as far gone as America as far as toxic values go. In fact, they’re a lot more conservative than they’re usually being given credit for.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 10:42 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      That’s the case for most of Europe and especially Sweden, which Americans seem to regard as some sort of Marxist dictatorship in which everyone is a communist. This being said, it’s not that hard to have social trust. I trust people of the same racial and social background as myself and distrust outsiders until they prove they’re trustworthy. Just invent your own society and disregard the rest.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 2:11 pm Zombie Shane

        > “Just invent your own society and disregard the rest.”

        Which works great right up until The Frankfurt School sends an army of 200 heavily armed bureaucrats [at least 50 of them snipers] to surround your ranch and to force you to “regard” them.

        BTW, this dude has a really good idea as to what we should be doing with our own sniper rifles:

        LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 12:01 pm Aquila

      Hey man, I hear ya. I used to be the same way, and now I see myself as a Celt/Nordic white man. I take great pride in the Viking’s accomplishments, and I feel like everything I was once proud of is a sham.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 2:24 pm Tim

        I’m guessing you’re American

        Got bored of being Irish did you?

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:32 pm FoolishPride (@FoolishProud)

        Aye. He got tired of being a plastic paddy he did.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 7:04 pm leeminh0

        Please everyone, read this funny thread, so many blue pill Christians commenting. I got tired to replying to many of them, some help please, they think Buddhist countries like Japan, Korea, Taiwan prospered because charity or adopting Christian principles, Lol I feel like an omniscient god aware of the IQ reason. I remember them that not all Christians are rich , like Venezuela, Ukraine, South Africa, and plus, they think the decline of America is because secularism and not Mexicans xD

        http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10776023/China-on-course-to-become-worlds-most-Christian-nation-within-15-years.html

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 7:11 pm Aquila

        Yeah, I’m still trying to figure out what I’m going to be next month…

        On a serious note, I’m proud of both of my European bloodlines, Irish and Norwegian. I think everyone should look into their ancestry.

        LikeLike


    • on April 23, 2014 at 8:34 pm John South

      It’s always easier to give in to your natural enemies, nothing to brag about.

      LikeLike


  2. on April 19, 2014 at 10:59 am FamilyMan

    I am not French, but hasn’t France been a war zone of right vs. left for centuries? The French Revolution was one of the first eruptions of Communism. World War I was fought just about entirely in France. And now you’ve got good solid people, the descendants of Descartes, Poincare and Saint-Saens, saddled with a media establishment and government that is infinitely far left.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 10:52 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      Only an American would think the French revolution has more in common with communism than the American revolution. The West had three leftist revolutions: the American one, the French one and the Bolshevik ones, three major wars in which the ‘left’ won in the US Civil War, WW1 and WW2 and a few minor reformations such as the 1848 revolts in Europe or the 1960s. I used to have far more respect for Americans before I got to realize that you take your own propaganda seriously and what you study is pretty blatant propaganda.

      I will give you a great example. Most Americans seem to minimize the role the French had in you achieving independence and they ascribe some heroic feats to the revolutionaries when the truth of the matter is that Britain was fighting a war with France and the Netherlands at the time and it was busy in India which combined with the logistical problems of deploying large numbers of men in the Americas resulted in them not being entirely committed in keeping you part of the empire. Secondly, you had no real Navy, the French provided you with one and they funded your revolution with the current equivalent of 13 trillion USD(this is direct aid, excluding the money spent on fighting the British themselves). Thirdly, you had no industry, which would have resulted in you running out of guns, ammo and cannons had the French not helped. Everything you learn about history in schools there is bullshit. The only way in which the US revolution isn’t left wing is by considering it the starting point of Western culture, which is imbecilic at best.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 11:14 am Zombie Shane

        > “three major wars in which the ‘left’ won in the US Civil War, WW1 and WW2”

        In retrospect, it is now becoming increasingly clear that Abraham Lincoln was our Julius Caesar – the man who put the final nail in the coffin of American republicanism.

        And, just like Caesar, his assassination failed to stop the horrifying course of events which his tyrannical nihilism had set in motion.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 11:32 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        I always wondered if I was the only one who didn’t feel quite right about Abe Lincoln. Even as a kid, something felt off.

        It took me a few years to put my finger on it, but I fully agree. Civil war did end a way of life that was, and could have continued to be far more prosperous and exemplary than the cesspool America has become today.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 11:39 am Zombie Shane

        Most importantly, it proved that you could use the Constitution as your own personal toilet paper and get away with it.

        FDR, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama – they’re all just following the lead set by Lincoln.

        The other thing that I am increasingly sensing is that the Reagan 80s did not represent the resurgence of America [which is what I had thought as a boy] so much as they were in fact the last dying gasps of America as we knew Her.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 12:26 pm Zombie Shane

        Off-Topic, but The Frankfurt School is out in force on this thread.

        Just as they always swarm any thread which dares to tiptoe onto the hallowed ground of Race Replacementism Theory.

        It looks like “Subway Masturbator” now calls itself “Kim du Toit”.

        And I guess that “Rum” is Whiskey’s new name?

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 12:39 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

        From what I understand, no nation is immune to this destructiveness though. I wonder how the remarkably similar global trends (all headed down the gutter) end.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 2:15 pm Zombie Shane

        > “I wonder how the remarkably similar global trends (all headed down the gutter) end.”

        Badly.

        The good news for us is that we are all very well aware of how it is going to end.

        So we will have only ourselves to blame if we failed to PREPARE for the Dark Times which await us.

        15 years ago – say, prior to the Y2K stroke of midnight, on January 1st, 2000 – I would have said that Preppers are all nuts.

        But now I think that anyone who is NOT prepping needs to have their head examined.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 6:38 pm ho

        What exactly did Carter do? Or Clinton or hell, Obama. (ok scratch that last one)

        FDR is responsible for the New Deal (although I have to be honest and admit that I don’t fully know it’s policies other than Krugman in the 30s) and ran for president for a 3rd time, Johnson is responsible for the Great Society. (could’ve mentioned Wilson here)

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 8:16 pm FamilyMan

        Yeah, my impression of Reagan at the time was that he was making things so absurd that the center could no longer hold.

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 12:41 am gaoxiaen

        Forgot a few, like Kennedy, Nixon, Bush1, and Bush 2. Reagan was truly a POS. Your list looks like it came straight from the Stupid Party. Any President respect the Constitution? You’re joking, right?

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 2:28 pm FamilyMan

        What does any of that have to do with whether the American revolution was more or less Communist than the French one.

        The American revolution was an ongoing business dispute. The business grievances are laid out in economic terms in the Declaration of Independence preamble. They are largely monetary concerns. The war was low intensity and indeed, as you say, as Cornwallis got tired of chasing Washington up and down the coast, following a defeat at Yorktown he just left and was redeployed to India. Some sort of truce was agreed whereby we actually paid war debts back to England — see the Treaty of Paris ending hostilities. Nothing Communist about this.

        Indeed France was a vital ally. We ended up owing them also, according to the Treaty of Paris. But amazingly, not just them, but England too.

        The French revolution was entirely different. “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity”, odd figures like Robespierre, mass beheadings, rioting, it was a Communistic revolution against the forces that had supported America against the British. Perhaps that’s why the British came back for another go at us in 1812, when we no longer had such support from France.

        Please explain how this isn’t much more accurate than what you wrote, Pijama.

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 4:35 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

        Learn to read, you babbling imbecile. I said the French revolution has more in common with the American one than with communism, which would mean you have to compare the ideals of the French revolution with those of the American revolution and the Bolshevik revolution. No wonder you guys keep frothing at the mouth about the Frankfurt school. Proper thinking isn’t exactly your forte. More about projecting everything bad about the world on other countries while you fap over your constitution.

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 7:32 pm Lucius Somesuch

        When did the Founding Fathers decide to create Heaven on Earth by mass-exterminating an aristocracy, and finally each other, before surrendering at the feet of a charismatic warrior-genius?

        And when did our women gad around in see-thru Empire dresses?

        When did we confiscate the holdings of the churches?

        When did we hold pagan festivals to a “Goddess of Reason”?

        When did we gang-rape and mutilate princesses in the streets?

        When was the Pope, or any religious head, held prisoner by our Revolutionary authorities?

        When did the American Revolution abolish the Christian calendar?

        When were Tory women subjected to show-trials, accused of child abuse, and beheaded?

        When did Hamilton, Madison, Jay, Franklin, or Washington repeat or echo the nihilist witticisms of Saint-Just? When did they even quote Voltaire or Rousseau?

        When did the American Revolutionaries throw Lafayette in prison?

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 2:44 pm backchecking

        $13 x `10^12 as war spending (epoc adjusted) compares to $73 x 10^12 current global GDP — so you’re imputing Louis XVI’s war spending to be 18% of the annual global GDP of the late 18th Century.

        Even allowing for six year term of French (official) involvement, you’ve got Paris spending 3% of the global GDP on warfare. That’s an estimate too high.

        Paris financed her war on the sly. Indeed, the royal treasurer managed to keep the numbers away from the Crown and the court.

        Off balance sheet financing was being used. (ie secret books)

        This free and easy debt expansion had, on France, the same bubble effects so well known across the planet today.

        The (off-the-books) can was kicked down the road until it burst with a banker’s rebellion. They wanted to cash out.

        The enormity of this debt became public in stages.

        All too soon the King discovered he’d have to boost tax rates immediately, even initiate new ones. However, to do that he had to re-convene the Estates General — the French legislative version of Parliament. (after a fashion) This dire step had been avoided since 1615.

        Upon audit the Crown debt was exposed. Creditors popped up from everywhere. The Crown was in over its head. The King would have to sell assets. Wealth taxes upon the nobility would have to be imposed.

        The political-financial crisis had even the peerage turning on the Crown!

        Then the rye crop was ruined; too much late rain. Food riots ensued.

        Unpaid soldiers, starving peasants, …

        Everything was resolved by seizing the Crown assets, terminating the dynasty. Most of the peers were liquidated, along with their immediate families. The peerage, per se, was extiguished.

        It was at this time the political axis of Left to Right was coined based upon seatings. Self-selection had the radicals caucusing off to the left of the Speaker, the royalists caucusing off to the right. So, it’s a French (political) artifact.

        The French did not imitate Americans, other than tossing out their King.

        The US Constitution was as green as grass. It only became effective March 4, 1789. Its federalist concepts never jumped the pond.

        France crafted a Paris-centric government.

        The larger schemes of the modern Leftist hadn’t even been hatched yet.

        Marx was two generations into the future.

        The anti-Royalist factions simply started up practically ab initio (many of the biggest players were political virgins) — based on the financial issue — and who was going to pay the blood price for screwing up everything.

        That’s why revolutionary policy was twisting on a dime — for months on end.

        Their tumult does not fit any grander story arc.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 11:04 pm FamilyMan

        Very interesting, thanks for what sounds like an expert perspective.

        But the alacrity with which the peers and their families were “liquidated” is startlingly coldblooded. Like these Catholics had no compunctions about killing, they had never read the commandment that forbids it. Very mechanical.

        Nothing like that in US history, or any other Euro country that I can think of.

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 1:41 am whiskeysplace

        France remained France: centralized, run by an aristocracy, everything out of Paris. Liquidation of the old elites by the new is as old as the Greeks, Carolingians, Merovinguans, Saxons, Normans, and Germans who slaghtered a third ir mire of their own people during the Thirty Years War.

        The French killed maybe a million Cathars in the 1200s.

        What others idiotically label Frankfort School is the tragic eternal flaw of the West … self slaughter. See Cromwell and the Protectorate. He slaughtered in the name if God nearly every aristocrat he could find.

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 8:11 am Zombie Shane

        > “What others idiotically label Frankfort School…”

        Meir Henoch Mojszewicz Wallach-Finkelstein:

        “WELL, THERE IS NO HUNGER.”

        http://www.garethjones.org/published_articles/st_patricks/litvinov_famine_denia_oldl.htm

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 4:41 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

        Leaving aside the methodological problems there, I didn’t pull the figure out of my ass, it’s exactly the modern equivalent of the 1.3 billion livres they spent and it’s not surprising they spent this much because they were the biggest empire in the 17th century and 2nd biggest in the 18th century if not the biggest. Their American territory was bigger than Britain’s and they had half of Africa and a part of India.

        LikeLike


      • on April 25, 2014 at 9:43 am Adamastor

        Please don’t talk about things you ignore. Africa was parted between the Powers in the late 19th. So much for anyone possessing half of it when the revolutions occured.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:33 pm FoolishPride (@FoolishProud)

        Had the Americans given up the French wouldn’t have been able to do shit to help their cause.

        Take that BS somewhere else, thank you.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 8:14 pm FamilyMan

        Which French? Presumably the French who helped us were the ones in power until they were thrown out around 1789.

        But I wrote a long post still to appear, noting that the American revolution was low-key and economic, whereas the French revolution was communistic. We had Washington, they had Robespierre. Totally different flavor.

        LikeLike


  3. on April 19, 2014 at 10:59 am sartaglo

    Boom!

    LikeLike


  4. on April 19, 2014 at 11:03 am fakeemail

    Hypergamy Dynamic (Alpha Fux/Beta Bux) => Self-Righteous Desire for Unjust Power => Leftism => 5th Column Media/Entertainment/Academics => Feminism => Multiculturalism => Cheap Labor Corporatism => Soulless Society/People => Self-Righteous Desire for Unjust Power. . .

    . . .and on and on in a big circle until soulless society translates into actual physical destruction via sterility and violence.

    If by some miracle, white people stage a “come back” and reclaim their countries a some point in the future, that alone is NOT ENOUGH. It has to be a patriarchal society that GUARANTEES each decent man a young virgin bride without undue stress. PERIOD.

    To quote some commentator from somewhere else “It is the supreme irony. White women used to stay home with their children too. The women’s movement made them all work in order to feel “valued”. But then who is to do the food preparation, gardening, home improvement, cleaning and child care that these women used to do? There was nothing left to do except bring in more immigrants. Now these immigrants are “fat” (by their home country’s standards) and they can afford not to have their women work.”

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 10:58 am Pijama Wearing Ninja

      Why should each ‘decent’ man be guaranteed a wife? I do understand that most women shouldn’t be trusted with important matters such as who should be a member of the next generation, but I hardly see why guaranteeing pretty much every man that can breathe a wife be good. I’d rather have my people get better, not stagnate or get worse, which is what will happen if you guarantee every subpar man gets to copulate.

      I think the Western marital tradition was good. A woman needs to consent to marry a man their parents approve of. And we need to view marriage like we used to do: it’s a merger of estates and the producing of legitimate heirs. It’s not about love, feelings or any of that. Concubinage(=modern marriage) is adequate for love.

      LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 8:01 am FamilyMan

        I suspect we are not “your people”. Aren’t you from India or something?

        LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 11:33 am quorasdesignatedasshole

      Actually, not even all males. Just those who can go through and pass the acceptable rites of passage.

      Isn’t that how it’s always been?

      LikeLike


  5. on April 19, 2014 at 11:24 am fnn

    There is more resistance to the Regime in France than anywhere else in the West. See Alain de Benoist and the rest of the French New Right, Front National, Bloc Identitaire, Alain Soral, Guillaume Faye, trad Catholics and the millions who marched against same-sex marriage/adoption last year. Of course none of the above have much in common with Glenn Miller and Alex Linder, the French (unlike the Brits and Americans) are very good at subtlety and nuance and the French take intellectuals seriously. The American resistance (such as it is) was what you saw over at the Bundy Ranch.

    LikeLike


  6. on April 19, 2014 at 11:27 am Grizzly

    The study is dancing around the issue. I’ve lived in Southern California for almost 25 years. We’ve got Whites, East Asians, Arabs, Indians, Pakistanis, Persians, Mexicans, Catholics, mainstream Protestants, Evangelicals, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and Mormons. Each of these groups gets along perfectly fine; everybody has their own typical problems in life of course, but there’s no “war” between those groups. Especially the East Asians! Whites date and marry them in ever-larger numbers because they share the same values that white culture traditionally holds–hard work, respect for family, elders, and husbands, respect for education, and huge numbers of them are Christians.

    Now, which group did I leave off this list? I left off the blacks. When lefties talk about “diversity,” they really mean “black.” The problem with the blacks is that they have an extreme hatred for non-blacks and especially whites (which is crazy because if you know anything about history, you would know that whites have treated each other far worse than anything they’ve ever done to blacks). Whites avoid blacks and black areas because they’ve turned themselves into a permanent criminal underclass, and they’ve turn their neighborhoods into run-down hellholes. They’ve done all this through their own efforts, and not as the result of white oppression. Want to make a leftie’s head explode? Point out to them that blacks were actually better off under segregation–less drug use, less criminality, less unemployment, and fewer abortions.

    You want to increase “diversity” in the idealized meaning of the world, in the sense of different groups of people living together without problems? Tell the blacks to stop murdering each other, stop doing drugs, stop engaging in endless petty crime, and to start embracing the same traditional values that Whites and Asians follow. Maybe then we won’t avoid them like the plague.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 12:47 pm Bardon

      Wrong. It’s better for whites that blacks behave “as usual” (as in Africa, the Caribbean, Brazil,…). More black criminal pathology- less miscegenation, less half-breeds and destruction of Euro-American culture & identity.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 3:43 pm Grizzly

        More black criminality means an increase in police oppressiveness. On the whole, the police department in LA county (which has a huge black population) is notorious for corruption and brutality, whereas the police here in Orange County (we have almost no blacks) are often nowhere to be found. More blacks doing drugs means more drugs available on the street, which whites get a hold of pretty easily. The black gangs in SoCal have no qualms about selling to whites. Black criminality also gives leftwingers excuses to enact gun-control laws.

        Half-breeds? If you’re worried about racial impurities, you better stay away from Italians, Spaniards, Greeks, Frenchmen, and Balkans and other Eastern Europeans. They’re a mixture of Celts, Goths, Turks, Anatolians, Caucasians, Mongolians, Persians, Scythians, Semites both Jewish and non-Jewish, Egyptians and other North Africans, and numerous other tribes from Central Asia whose names have been lost to history; all of these groups have spread their genes throughout Europe over the centuries through conquest, trade, and slavery. If you’re of European descent then there’s a real good chance you’re carrying some of those impurities.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:54 pm Bardon

        I am not of European descent; I am an European myself. And you, sir, are “blessed” with neighbors you seem to deserve. Enjoy: http://whitelocust.wordpress.com/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners/

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 6:06 pm Grizzly

        You are a European, which makes you a half-breed. You’ve got impure genes in you.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 6:09 pm thwack

        you guys should hang each other.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 6:44 pm Bardon

        Why ? One is an American ignoramus believing in pop-genetics & obsessed with provincial grievances; the other is a European rationalist thinking that out of 7 billion humans currently residing on planet earth, at lest 5 billions are superfluous & should be removed by from the face of earth without much fuss.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 8:42 pm Grizzly

        I’ll pass. Our friendly mongrel Mr. Bardon can delude himself all he likes as to his genetic impurity, but unfortunately for him his characterization of history as “pop genetics” cannot gloss over the fact that Europeans are far from being genetically pure, and that over the centuries they have interbred with Semites, Turks, Africans, Asians, and others. Hell, Christianity is a religion that was invented by Jews (Semites) and refined in Greece and Italy (by mongrels), and in Egypt (North Africans). If he is a Christian, then he is subservient to a Jewish. How’s that purity for ya?

        I have no provincial grievances, that is not really an issue in the U.S. Unfortunately, I cannot reply to Bardon’s comment below because the commenting system does not allow further replies at this point, but I’m interested as to what exactly makes those people superfluous, and exactly why he thinks they should be exterminated. He should be able to reply to this comment.

        I’ll take the U.S. over Europe any day. We have better beer and hotter women.

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 12:58 pm OralCummings

        I do NOT see these guys achieving Same Night Lays…I just dont.

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 2:07 pm The Spirit Within

        Grizzly refuses to admit that there are, at minimum, four different classes of black Americans. Yes, the one that he speaks of is hopeless, doomed to poverty and misery, unable to imagine life outside a ghetto mentality.

        The other three classes are much better.

        http://www.amazon.com/Disintegration-The-Splintering-Black-America/dp/0767929969

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 12:22 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

        Hotter women in US than Europe?

        Is that what you said, or did I misread it?

        LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 10:19 am Tim

      LikeLike


  7. on April 19, 2014 at 11:34 am Laguna Beach Fogey

    War couldn’t come soon enough.

    LikeLike


  8. on April 19, 2014 at 11:41 am Director

    Charles Bukowski.

    I read through Women by the Bar Fly hisself.

    He never banged a black. He was chatted up by a hooker but bolted when he got to her place. He expected a 300 lb gorilla to jump out the closet and rob him.

    He was eye deep in sluts and his instincts were right.

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 4:10 pm FamilyMan

      I am reading the first few pages now.

      “I know your (secret) tragedy.” …. “You pussy is large.”

      Beautiful. I’ll remember that one.

      LikeLike


  9. on April 19, 2014 at 11:43 am Director

    Family Man,

    You missed the point.

    The Blood Will Out.

    Communism, capitalism it’s all a fucking smoke screen for YKW.

    LikeLike


  10. on April 19, 2014 at 11:47 am thwack

    Laguna Beach Fogey

    War couldn’t come soon enough.
    ——————————————————————————————–

    sssshhhh, (white supremacy is race war, dont wake up the ni66ers)

    LikeLike


  11. on April 19, 2014 at 11:47 am quorasdesignatedasshole

    Is it now not possible to reply to specific comments?

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 10:05 am Paul Murray

      No. Why?

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 11:29 am quorasdesignatedasshole

        Well it wasn’t working yesterday.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 11:35 am Zombie Shane

        Nested threading keeps coming and going.

        Right now it seems to be working again.

        And nope, I have no desire whatsoever to look at the source code to figure out what was going wrong. Have you looked at any production web code recently? Talk about untying the gordian knot.

        Finally, we mustn’t rule out the possibility of interference on the part of Kevin Conboy from Colorado…

        https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/01/02/is-a-blubbering-inner-party-leftoid-trying-to-silence-chateau-heartiste/

        LikeLike


  12. on April 19, 2014 at 11:48 am Rum

    My patrilenial family of origyn had to leave France in the middle of the night in fear of their lives in 1686. It still gets talked about around the campfires when we gather.
    I greatly admire the Kurdish people. They have not always been good at politics, but they have always understood the basic issues pretty well. And they have very long memories.
    The great Muslim warlord Sala-hadin was not an Arab. He was Kurdish. Some of the largest discoveries of Neanderthal remains have occurred in – the mountains of northern Iraq, AKA Kurdistan.
    My point is that the times we live in demand some long term thinking. Very long term…

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 2:09 pm The Spirit Within

      As long as that long-term thinking is FORWARD, not backwards. Because what is human history except one long ignorant struggle?

      LikeLike


  13. on April 19, 2014 at 11:49 am Director

    I’ve rescued a few of ’em from the pit of “togetherness”.

    No intention of turning any of the lassies fascist, just making sure that they can name the disconnect between the reality of dispossession and the Potemkin village facade of plenty.

    LikeLike


  14. on April 19, 2014 at 11:56 am Director

    on April 19, 2014 at 11:47 amthwack
    Laguna Beach Fogey
    War couldn’t come soon enough.
    ——————————————————————————————–
    sssshhhh, (white supremacy is race war, dont wake up the ni66ers)

    The slow grinding apocalypse in Detroit, Chimpcago, St Louis, New Orleans, Newark, Camden, Ookland, Haiti, Miami, Baltimore, Philly, Cleveland where the chimps sit atop the best real estate flinging poo is already worse than many civil wars recorded in history.

    Archeologists surveying North America will look at some of these sites and think of quotes from Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.

    They could have just as easily read Stuff Black People Don’t Like by Paul Kersey. There’s more truth in it.

    LikeLike


  15. on April 19, 2014 at 12:02 pm mindweapon

    Reblogged this on Mindweapons in Ragnarok and commented:
    Within the millennial generation in particular, multicultural consumers have a much higher level of influence on their non-Hispanic white counterparts
    That’s what people are to them, “consumers.” And my personal experience of a sample of hundreds of people, the whigger thing has come and gone. There are a remnant of whiggers and they are a permanent (for now) fixture among young whites, but blacks and acting black is no longer as mandatorily cool as they once were. Trends come and go, even trends designed and funded by the hostile elites.

    LikeLike


  16. on April 19, 2014 at 12:03 pm Director

    In late antiquity, what sort of people actually occupied the cities in the Western Roman Empire? Were they mystery meat darks and a liberal Roman elite?

    No wonder the Germanics interrupted their fun n games. If there were to be a serious economic (really just a shut down of migration) most American cities could be ploughed under and turned into something useful.

    Europe and Japan are probably in this situation duly conscious of the choice ahead. The white and Jewish elite in the US appear to be oblivious to the reality that American cities are just third world slums in waiting.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:20 pm Zombie Shane

      > “In late antiquity, what sort of people actually occupied the cities in the Western Roman Empire? Were they mystery meat darks and a liberal Roman elite?”

      If you are at all interested in the answer to this question, stop whatever you are doing right now and immediately start reading Tenney Frank.

      Then you will start to understand why I am screaming at dudes to put white buns in white ovens:

      http://www.toqonline.com/archives/v5n4/54-Frank.pdf

      “…We know, for instance, in Caesar’s day of forty-five patricians, only one of whom is represented by posterity when Hadrian came to power. The Aemilii, Fabii, Claudii, Manlii, Valerii, and all the rest, with the exception of the Cornelii, have disappeared. Augustus and Claudius raised twenty-five families to the patriciate, and all but six of them disappear before Nerva’s reign. Of the families of nearly four hundred senators recorded in 65 A.D. under Nero, all trace of a half is lost by Nerva’s day, a generation later. And the records are so full that these statistics may be assumed to represent with a fair degree of accuracy the disappearance of the male stock of the families in question. Of course members of the aristocracy were the chief sufferers from the tyranny of the century, but this havoc was not all wrought by delatores and assassins. The voluntary choice of childlessness accounts largely for the unparalleled condition…”

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:52 pm Zombie Shane

      Maybe this won’t get LIFO’d:

      http://www.toqonline.com/archives/v5n4/54-Frank.pdf

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 3:53 pm Zombie Shane

        ^Read it, know it, live it.

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 12:59 pm OralCummings

        I got through the first paragraph. Does I get a cookie?

        LikeLike


      • on April 22, 2014 at 9:05 am FamilyMan

        I’m sorry. It’s not actually hard to read.

        LikeLike


  17. on April 19, 2014 at 12:10 pm jrackl

    “So we’re seeing that even outside of areas like trust, non-Hispanic white millennials have begun to adopt certain multicultural [sic] behaviors or characteristics.”

    I eat tortillas so I’ve signed on to the race replacement program?

    It’s a bit like, “they are like us because they wear blue jeans.”

    LikeLike


  18. on April 19, 2014 at 12:12 pm Southern Man

    Yikes, is comment threading broken on all the posts?

    LikeLike


  19. on April 19, 2014 at 12:34 pm whorefinder

    And may all those millennial girls who have sex with/date apes get the rape they oh so deserve.

    And no white man comes to save their skanky ass.

    Rape!

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 11:35 am quorasdesignatedasshole

      I don’t think ANY girl deserves “saving”. Loving, sure, can be reserved for some. But what’s with the “saving”?

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 1:10 pm whorefinder

        The old beta in me, I suppose. Fuck that guy.

        Rape!

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 1:12 pm quorasdesignatedasshole

        Cheers to fucking the beta.
        Double to the rape.

        LikeLike


  20. on April 19, 2014 at 12:36 pm Director

    Jrackl,

    That’s what the PC study has found. Every little thing you do counts. Food items probably are trivial but they may or may not be counted in the study.

    My guess is that it has more to do with language use, sympathies, patterns of consumption, spending habits.

    LikeLike


  21. on April 19, 2014 at 12:53 pm corvinus

    I’ve gone further than social distrust in my evolution.

    I used to be a God fearing conservative patriot. I don’t feel any attachment towards my nation anymore.

    I see myself now as being of French White European descent. –Dragases

    Congrats. Although as I’m of British Isles descent, I imagine it’d be much more difficult for me, especially since the women there are crappier than Ameriskanks.

    I am not French, but hasn’t France been a war zone of right vs. left for centuries? The French Revolution was one of the first eruptions of Communism. World War I was fought just about entirely in France. And now you’ve got good solid people, the descendants of Descartes, Poincare and Saint-Saens, saddled with a media establishment and government that is infinitely far left. –FamilyMan

    Yes. Also, the liberal French elites deliberately flooded their country with Afro-Muslims because the few practicing Catholics they have left are for the most part traditionalist SSPX types. I’m not sure the leftoids there would have the hold on power they do if they hadn’t.

    Yikes, is comment threading broken on all the posts? –SouthernMan

    Looks like it. I think if CH is going to do this, then perhaps he should enable a Quote option so the reader knows who a poster is replying to, as I’m doing manually here.

    LikeLike


  22. on April 19, 2014 at 1:09 pm VRW

    Masterful trolling:

    http://thoughtcatalog.com/anne-gus/

    http://groupthink.jezebel.com/just-who-is-anne-gus-and-what-does-he-want-ill-te-1557294417

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 2:28 pm Tim

      Superb!

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 5:20 pm driveallnight

      Lulz, lezebel’s forum is even named “groupthink”

      LikeLike


  23. on April 19, 2014 at 1:19 pm thwack

    quorasdesignatedasshole

    Is it now not possible to reply to specific comments?
    ———————————————————————————————

    Ni66ers are the reason we cant have nice things.

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 1:14 pm OralCummings

      This

      LikeLike


  24. on April 19, 2014 at 1:24 pm brookingstyler

    They might have figured something was wrong after getting trophies and A’s for showing up to school and baseball practice, being told they could do anything they want by their parents, teachers and, increasingly,…television commercials.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 5:10 pm Zombie Shane

      Can you imagine graduating from college with $200,000 in student loan debt, a completely worthless [non-STEM] liberal arts degree, and facing a job market where labor force participation just plummeted to 40-year-lows?

      And I’m not talking about one of GBFM’s ebernankified whores – even just some relatively normal guy, who followed in his father’s footsteps, and got a Poly Sci or English or History or Classics degree?

      And that student loan debt ain’t dischargeable in bankruptcy court.

      That shit follows you for the rest of your life.

      Mister -$200,000 will have to swallow his pride and take night classes at the local community college, learning something useful, like how to embed Visual Basic for Applications scripts within Excel Spreadsheets.

      LikeLike


  25. on April 19, 2014 at 1:27 pm VXXC

    Dissembling media leftoids are causing the rise in social distrust. Yep.

    Millennial’s vote left of course because they’re debt slaves.

    Jubilee for all must indeed be an aim of any ah..er..Reboot.

    The elites had theirs, now we have ours.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 2:11 pm l82dagame

      Remember, even the majority of young whites voted for Romney. The reason all young people put together voted mostly for Obama was the fact that so many are non-white.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:13 pm Zombie Shane

        Also, do not forget that McCain won college edumakated whites by 1% in 2008.

        Then Romney opened that up to a massive landslide victory amongst college edumakated whites, by 18%, in 2012.

        Not all hope is lost.

        Our big problem is that whites are going to have to take off the gloves eventually.

        Quit playing nice with The Frankfurt School.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 11:08 pm BetaBoy

        According to the Pew Research exit polls, Whites under 30 voted by 9 points for Obama in ’08, but went +6 for Romney in ’12, despite Romney being anti-abortion and gay marriage, which supposedly, would lose him the youth vote. The problem was that overall non-Whites, Blacks, Asians, and Latinos under 30 voted for Obama by 50 points. Non whites basically voted against the White guy.

        LikeLike


      • on April 23, 2014 at 1:07 am FamilyMan

        Some voter fraud and vote-counting fraud didn’t hurt, either. I suspect Romney won in 2012.

        LikeLike


  26. on April 19, 2014 at 1:29 pm Director

    “LEAK: It’s just being savvy and being realistic, and I think that’s what it is for a lot of millennials. It’s not about being optimistic or pessimistic. It’s about being realistic.”

    Race realism?

    This generation of whites are turning into wiggers if they are not actively resisting.

    LikeLike


  27. on April 19, 2014 at 1:29 pm VXXC

    I wouldn’t quit on America now of all times BTW. It’s just getting interesting. Cowboys…of all things.

    Storm Brews in Cowboy-Land.

    http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/55915817-90/areas-bill-federal-government.html.csp …

    LikeLike


  28. on April 19, 2014 at 1:34 pm ho

    “or extolling the artistry of anime.”

    As if anime couldn’t possibly be artistic.

    Come on, don’t let Pleasureman infect you with his stupid SoCon, “men are immature, that’s why society is failing” toolery.

    LikeLike


  29. on April 19, 2014 at 1:49 pm Francis

    Better buy firearms.

    LikeLike


  30. on April 19, 2014 at 2:00 pm Zombie Shane

    > “Communism, capitalism it’s all a fucking smoke screen for YKW.”

    Thread winner.

    Next thread.

    LikeLike


  31. on April 19, 2014 at 2:00 pm Days of Broken Arrows

    Great placement of that Oscar Wilde quote. The dude knew.

    LikeLike


  32. on April 19, 2014 at 2:28 pm Deadly Guy

    You’ve completed mis-interpreted and twisted the actual info in the article. You glossed over one crucial fact:

    “I think that, ultimately, it stems from their (minorities) history of having to deal with persecution and discrimination, whether in their personal lives or within the business setting.”

    More minorities make up millennials. Minorities are more subject to discrimination. Which explains why they are less trusting.

    LikeLike


  33. on April 19, 2014 at 2:46 pm Director

    Deadly Guy,

    At a certain point who is the minority? Who can claim alterity or the status of other when the white birth rate has dipped below 50% in the US? Whites are below 50% in new births. FACT. They are a minority now. I take it to mean you actually think that blacks and browns are somehow shat upon by white people all the time? wft is this about?

    LikeLike


  34. on April 19, 2014 at 2:56 pm tteclod

    Perhaps Deadly Guy and Director agree without realizing it: everybody is a minority, therefore, trust wanes.

    LikeLike


  35. on April 19, 2014 at 3:24 pm sciences with lisps

    “A drop of wine into sewage makes sewage. A drop of sewage into wine makes sewage.”

    Booyah. This is why government-forced migration of dungskins into white enclaves will not make the dungskins better; it will just destroy decent white cities. This is by design, by the explicitly anti-white federal government.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:03 pm backchecking

      Actually, DWL are so out of touch that they actually believe their stink is working.

      They are killing humanity with altruism.

      LikeLike


  36. on April 19, 2014 at 3:46 pm Troubadour

    I turned on NPR the other day, and only managed to listen for about three minutes.

    I had a good friend who used to talk about My Little Pony like it was some kind of religion, and he has an impressively hideous fat feminist harpy wife who brags on Facebook about her “misandry red” lipstick.

    I’ve come a long way by flushing all that crap, and all those people from my life.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 10:44 am Zombie Shane

      > “I’ve come a long way by flushing all that crap, and all those people from my life.”

      I can no longer break bread with any white people who support the Frankfurt School war to destroy Western Civilization.

      And the other day, I was introduced to a smoking hawt European gal, but then when I discovered that she was a mudshark, my dick immediately went limp.

      Now the sight of her makes me nauseous.

      PS: Nicole, just so you’ll understand, I don’t hate on this bitch so much for fornicating with a chimpanzee as much as I hate on her for being so SMALL-MINDED that she could allow herself to be manipulated into that bestiality by the Frankfurt School.

      It’s the complete lack of any inner moral compass which really sickens me – the utter inability to see through all the anti-civilizational propaganda and disinformation for what it is.

      LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 1:16 pm OralCummings

        Did you confront her about it and express your disdain? if so what was her response?

        LikeLike


      • on April 22, 2014 at 4:03 am thwack

        And the other day, I was introduced to a smoking hawt European gal, but then when I discovered that she was a mudshark, my dick immediately went limp.
        ———————————————————————————————–

        Why didn’t you convert her back into an ice shark with your superior white dick?

        LikeLike


      • on April 23, 2014 at 1:10 am FamilyMan

        We have no interest in converting them back, and anyway they are no longer pure.

        LikeLike


      • on April 23, 2014 at 8:40 pm John South

        Once you go black, we don’t want you back.

        LikeLike


  37. on April 19, 2014 at 3:48 pm cynthia

    The irony is that most Millennials have no idea what other cultures actually are. They’re engaging with their own fantasies, not reality. This is especially pronounced in the weaboos.

    LikeLike


    • on April 23, 2014 at 1:12 am FamilyMan

      This is a goal of the diversity mongers. They push tolerance, while removing actual opportunities (e.g. traveling, learning foreign language) to learn about foreign cultures.

      The goal was never to make world citizens but to make slaves. The leadership will travel and come back and tell us what new shit we have to do in the name of diversity and being global citizens.

      LikeLike


  38. on April 19, 2014 at 4:01 pm Libertardian

    “Within the millennial generation in particular, multicultural consumers have a much higher level of influence on their non-Hispanic white counterparts.”

    I don’t remember the MoT ever labeling George Zimmerman a “Hispanic white”. Putting “white” first must be reserved for pejorative subtexts.

    LikeLike


  39. on April 19, 2014 at 4:08 pm Atlanta Man

    South Dakota is a trustworthy place because it is South Dakota not because it is 84 percent white. There is no one fucking there man, you know everyone there in a years time. It is like Mississippi when I lived there after three months everyone knew my name, who I dated, my major in school, the group of people I hung around basically everything about me was common knowledge to the whole county. I had my car break down on a back road and a woman picked me up while I was walking to the Main Street ( this was the nineties before cellphones were ubiquitous). It was late at night and she was alone , I had never met her but she knew damn near everything about me but my social security number. Flyover country = Small towns = Trust.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:08 pm backchecking

      News flash: that part of America was settled in the 19th Century by Nordics and Germanics — typically as extended families or clans.

      Many tiny burgs were speaking Danish, Swedish or German right up through WWI.

      You had villages of cousins. Intermarriage was sky high.

      How uni-racial can you get?

      LikeLike


      • on April 22, 2014 at 4:04 am thwack

        that part of America was settled in the 19th Century by Nordics and Germanics
        ———————————————————————————————-

        No, they were brought there as slaves.

        LikeLike


  40. on April 19, 2014 at 4:35 pm Tilikum

    to our shiv lord…..

    re: nested comments. shall we overcome, adapt, or improvise? maybe just stop commenting so much lol…

    LikeLike


  41. on April 19, 2014 at 5:02 pm Gr8YT

    Despite this lack of trust, the study says, the millennial generation is the most upbeat about the future of the country

    A pessimist would say that things can’t get any worse. An optimist would respond “yes they can!”

    LikeLike


  42. on April 19, 2014 at 5:21 pm Kim du Toit

    “Better buy firearms.”

    Good luck finding ammo once you’ve made your purchase. Those of us who know about this stuff have been doing it since the Clinton years, and we have, as they say, an adequate sufficiency.

    Every man in this country should own a rifle* by age 18, a handgun* by age 22, at least a thousand rounds of ammo for each, and the necessary skills to operate them as required.

    Women may go along as they wish, and they should (I have personally taught over 500 women how to buy guns and shoot them, and I continue to do so. Nothing makes me happier than a woman who knows how protect herself; for a man, it’s his goddamn duty.)

    * .22s don’t count: they are household appliances, not guns.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 12:16 pm BlackSun666

      .22lr is a most versatile cartridge, no less a lethal projectile… Fool.

      Females, Feminism, and Firearms don’t mix. I see it as the ultimate expression of penis envy. It is dangerous for society and unaltered MEN in general. If a woman wants to pick up the sword to conquer and repel invading foes(foreigners), that is the only exception. However, they would do best by actually serving others and exemplifying their traditional archetypes.

      LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 6:30 am The Burninator

      There’s plenty of ammo out here, and the prices are coming down again but fast. You live on the east coast or something? Here in flyover land I can buy 20 rounds of .223 for $5.99, by the pallet full. .308 is going for $7.99 per 20 (these are current prices, was at a gun store two days ago).

      Agree on owning a rifle by 18 and handgun by 21.

      As to .22’s, those are perfectly serviceable firearms. They are fantastic for hunting small game without getting noticed. Quiet and just as deadly as anything else, cheap to shoot, easy to carry thousands of rounds on your back.

      LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 10:38 pm Ryan Vann

        Yeah. 22lr is basically the only ammo that there is a dearth of in Arpaioville.

        LikeLike


    • on April 23, 2014 at 8:42 pm John South

      Shut up, you don’t own a gun.

      Everything you just said makes it obvious you don’t shoot.

      There is plenty of ammo, you can buy 5.56 by the case at wallyworld and that’s on the east coast.

      What you can’t get easily is .22.

      LikeLike


  43. on April 19, 2014 at 5:32 pm Joe Sixpack

    This being NPR, leftoid headquarters, the bleeding obvious escapes them.

    This reminds me of the Leftist idiots here in the State of California who, a few years ago decided, in their infinite wisdom that, because the crime rate had “unexpectedly” dropped so low that We the People should weaken the Three Strikes law.

    It was above their level of comprehension (ie 4th grade reasoning) that IT WAS PRECISELY BECAUSE OF the Three Strikes Law that the crime rate was low!! When 5% of the populace commits 95% of the crime, when you have a larger percentage of the thugs locked down, the crime rate will drop.

    So the election comes around and, sure enough, there’s a bill to weaken the Three Strikes Law.

    And, in true dipshit Lefty California fashion, the sumabitch ballot measure passed and became law!

    Their mental architecture is fundamentally incomplete and they are, at once, devoid of the ability to reason, have zero motivation or attention span to examine their own faults, and become hyper agitated and snarky when calmly presented with rational fact.

    LikeLike


  44. on April 19, 2014 at 6:02 pm Moonchild

    I had to learn a different version of history than had been taught to me in my public school education. I had always thought of them as victims, just like they wanted me to. Then I learned of the history of their people. I learned how they were swatted away like parasites everywhere from Europe to Russia to the Middle East. I learned about what their religion taught them about how they were God’s chosen people, destined to rule the world. I learned why they had a common history no matter where they fled to. I learned about how they used deception and subversion as weapons against their enemies. I learned of their control of the media, academia, and the monetary system. I learned about how they had different codes of ethics for dealing with each other and dealing with “others”. I learned their methods of concealing their power. I read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. I read Henry Ford’s The International Jew. It all made a dangerous amount of sense. Dots started connecting in ways they couldn’t have before. I began to see the culprits behind the current state of affairs. I began to see their plans. I realized who the true enemy was.

    LikeLike


  45. on April 19, 2014 at 6:28 pm Arbiter

    I greatly admire the Kurdish people.

    Answer: Hmm, let’s see…. “Things No One Has Said Ever”?

    They have not always been good at politics, but they have always understood the basic issues pretty well.

    So do apes. Very territorial, apes.

    The great Muslim warlord Sala-hadin was not an Arab. He was Kurdish.

    And thirteen percent of Blacks have an IQ higher than the White average of 100. Thirteen percent. You can pick out individual after individual and put them in a long line of names, and people who with deficient abstract thinking will think “Wow! That’s overwhelming! So many names!” Standard media tactic. For those who are good at math, though, that’s still just thirteen percent.

    Some of the largest discoveries of Neanderthal remains have occurred in – the mountains of northern Iraq, AKA Kurdistan.

    That area was White for thousands of years. White conquerors lived in tribes and kingdoms stretching from southern Europe to western China. There on the steppes in what is now called China, you would find the Tokharians, “East Aryans”, with red and blond hair. They brought the wheel to the east. Elsewhere you would find the Aryan conquerors who set up the caste system in northern India to preserve their kind, which worked for thousands of years – Siddharta Gautaman, “Buddha”, came from the top caste in northern India, meaning he definitely had White blood. (Even when the British arrived they found people in northern India who looked like black-haired Europeans.) For thousands of years the order held.

    And no one had heard of Kurds. A mix of conquerors and their slaves and servants, just like the Arabs and Persians (the latter being the more successful mix; Iranians in Europe are the only group of asylum parasites who go to college at the same rate as Germanics. “Iran”, “Land of the Aryan” they call Persia today as a way to feel connected to the masters who tragically slowly mixed with the conquered over the millennia). A cautionary tale.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:50 pm Zombie Shane

      > “And thirteen percent of Blacks have an IQ higher than the White average of 100.”

      That would be true if blacks had an average IQ of 85, with a Standard Deviation of 15.

      But young blacks today have an average IQ no higher than 80.

      And many people fear that their SD might be more like 12, rather than 15.

      LikeLike


  46. on April 19, 2014 at 6:40 pm Arbiter

    I see myself now as being of French White European descent. I visited France last year, and I felt a strong feeling of kinship and attachment with the people there.

    That peculiar and completely contraproductive American psychological survival mechanism. “I don’t have to care about these people, because they are not my people anyway!” Yes, dream of the postcard picture of Europe.

    I remember a French guy telling me, about Glenn Beck when he had his show: Yes, Glenn Beck is clownish, but in France we have nothing like that, no conservative on TV, not even a clownish one.

    Only in America could you have militia show up in defense of rancher Cliven Bundy, to prevent Harry Reid and his son Rory Reid, now representing the BLM, from taking the ranch and handing it over to a Chinese company they have sold the rest of the land in that area for about 15 percent of its real value, using a tortoise as an excuse. (Meanwhile they have killed off thousands of tortoises in a reservation because it was too expensive to keep them.) Only in America could you have militia at all, or arm yourself individually, which is what the establishment hates and actually fears. Those who went to that ranch are people actually doing something. And they sang the national anthem and honored the flag as their symbol. They didn’t buy into the media’s false image of “American” being a race-mixed, leftist story. They hold on to the real image of America as being them and their kind.

    Those who want to escape that responsibility eagerly surrender the flag and other symbolism to the Left, eagerly accept their false explanation of what the country’s real culture is, and then dream of Europe. Some nutcases actually go to live in Europe, giving up the support network and other advantages that come with living in the country you grew up in. Enjoy your entry-level work in the cheapest part of town, and enjoy never being of any use for your people. Enjoy that cheap liquor when you realize how dumb you were, believing the starry-eyed plans about migration that you read online. Don’t think any European nationalist party or organization will welcome you. We simply think you are idiots who leave the country where you would be the most useful.

    LikeLike


  47. on April 19, 2014 at 6:40 pm Damnd

    When the common denominator is the reasoning that multiculturalism equals progress, you know where the nation is headed to…

    LikeLike


  48. on April 19, 2014 at 7:00 pm FuriousFerret

    It seems the comments themselves decided to be communist and have a flat hierarchy. Fuark. Et tu WordPress?

    LikeLike


  49. on April 19, 2014 at 7:01 pm Director

    Arbiter,

    No! Plenty of Yanks resettle comfortably in the UK, France, Germany, Czech, Denmark… Ireland.

    Eamon Devalera was a Yank and he was the first President of The Republic of Ireland.

    Entry level? Eh?

    LikeLike


  50. on April 19, 2014 at 7:05 pm Arbiter

    In late antiquity, what sort of people actually occupied the cities in the Western Roman Empire? Were they mystery meat darks and a liberal Roman elite?

    No wonder the Germanics interrupted their fun n games.

    Well, Julius Caesar had blond hair, unlike the actor in Rome the TV Series. (Later you had Clovis and Charlemagne, also with blond hair, laying the foundation for France and Germany in Medieval Europe.) Before that, Socrates lamented that people in Greece were darkening due to the mixing with immigrants from the east. Before that, there were mummies in Egypt with blond and red hair. Though the pharaohs, as people so often do, spawned offspring with the more attractive of their slaves, and sometimes put the offspring in high positions. Eventually there were part-Negroid pharaohs. This was a time where a writer lamented, “You cannot leave your home without your shield.” (For those only used to Hollywood swordfighting: a shield is necessary for real battle. If you have men with spears meeting men with spears and shields, there is no contest.)

    After that, of course, Alexander the Great invaded Egypt, and his general Ptolemy became the new pharaoh. His line ruled and spoke only Greek, for centuries. Cleopatra, the last of them (who foolishly lost the country because she got greedy and started a war together with Marcus Antonius) was the first who learned to speak Egyptian. Something to think about when in “Black History Month” you see posters of a Black presented as Cleopatra, who was pure Greek.

    And Hannibal, if it needs to be said, was also White of course. I have seen posters presenting him as Black. Northern Africa was never Black territory. But people are too dumb today to know that. “Northern Africa, that means Africans lived there!” The name Africa was the name of a Roman-built province.

    Regarding the Germanic conquerors, it is important to note that Rome’s rulers did their best to destroy the country. The Senate was filled with representatives who were not Romans, and so were important financial positions. They had no concern for the Roman destiny and sought only to slice off a piece of the pie for their own. Rome became decadent and corrupt and produced few children. Eventually much of the army was made up of auxiliaries. A third of Roman soldiers were Germanics, and naturally they revolted and took regions for themselves sometimes, as people do. By then the Roman people feared the Roman army, which was described as “a swarm of locusts”. Whenever the army came to a region they ate everything. The crops disappeared. In order to pay for this army the Roman emperors debased the currency, until there was practically no gold left in the gold coins. This devastated people’s savings and made commerce impossible. When Germanic conquerors came, people often saw them as liberators – no longer would they have to pay for the Roman army or have their crops stolen.

    In the end, of course, the Visigoths had gone through Italy to southern France and northern Spain. (They brought with them Latin to the new conquerors, the Germanic Franks, and brought with them Christianity to Western Europe. The bishops in the Roman ruins have lied to them, telling them that these great ruins were created because Rome was Christian. Of course, it was created long before Christianity, and it fell in the Christian era when people lost the will to be tough and fight for the Roman destiny.) The Ostrogoths, then, on a mission from East Rome, conquered Italy and brought peace to that chaotic land. They broke with East Rome, and King Theodoric set up two sets of laws, Roman law and Gothic law. The Romans praised him for this, and they enjoyed a peaceful era for the first time in centuries, until East Rome came and tried to invade.

    The Goths, from southern Sweden and nothern Germany, have a very interesting history. Many geographical names in southern Sweden harken back to that time, like “Gothenburg”. They went as far as Crimea, where they set up a Gothic kingdom that lasted for many centuries. The Ostrogoths were conquered by the Huns, same as everyone else in East Europe, but the Gothic language became a lingua franca in the Hunnic empire, and the Goths served as mediators between the many peoples there. Eventually they allied with a Hunnic nobleman against the Hunnic ruler and revolted, finally ending Hunnic rule in Europe.

    That is something Hollywood could make a movie about. But of course, they never will.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 2:20 pm l82dagame

      Hollywood could make a movie like that, but of course there would always be a sub Saharan African holding some critical poition in the Goth’s rise to power. Much like when History Channel reenacts George Washington’s victories, there is always a black inserted where Washington would get his most crucial advice.

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:28 pm backchecking

      ” In order to pay for this army the Roman emperors debased the currency, until there was practically no gold left in the gold coins.”

      Erroneous.

      Classic Rome ran its government budget on SILVER only. It was never nominated in gold. Salaries were paid in SALT (hence the term) or in silver or copper.

      Gold specie was NEVER debased at that time – since it was only traded/ used by those ‘who made the rules.’

      Gold was used primarily as a religious metal or as ‘blood money’ – ie as ransom or big payoffs. Famously, the Huns insisted on gold.

      Gold was also used by the elites to purchase spices from India.

      But, inside the Roman economy, it was silver every time. (exceptions made for huge land sales, etc.)

      Silver as THE commercial metal: Spain, China, America, France, Britain (until 19th Century) Holland Portugal… on back through time.

      Gold was THE religious metal, and still is. Aztecs, Inca, Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, … every dang culture you can point a stick at.

      &&&

      Almost every single barbarian invasion was triggered because the barbarian tribe was enforcing payment on services rendered. The Vandals stopped off in Rome to ‘get paid’ – then split within three days! The Roman Empire was a chronic deadbeat.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 3:48 pm Kim du Toit

        @backchecking: bringing actual facts to this website will not be welcomed. Far better just to agree with all the lunatic, unsupported half-assed theories, lest you end up being called a troll or phony

        That said: Roman legionnaries were never paid in salt (see Luttwak on this point). But you’re not altogether wrong: most legionnaries bought salt from the camp commissary on payday, because as the locals had little use for coinage, salt was a better means of exchange where they were encamped. Legionnaries took to calling their pay “salt-silver” (sal-argentum), which is the actual origin of the word “salary”. I don’t have the exact source handy, but email me and I’ll happily look it up for you.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:07 pm ho

        “@backchecking: bringing actual facts to this website will not be welcomed. Far better just to agree with all the lunatic, unsupported half-assed theories, lest you end up being called a troll or phony”

        So because of that TINY, TINY error (that wasn’t even much of an error ACCORDING TO YOU) you see it fit to suck up to a commenter that doesn’t even disagree much with the person he responds to.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:24 pm Kim du Toit

        Agreement with someone is not “sucking up”, it’s agreement. And the “Romans paid in salt” misconception is so common, I try to correct it wherever I can. And Mr. backchecking didn’t “disagree much” with the earlier commenter: he trashed his statement utterly.

        Much like I’m doing to yours right now.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 6:53 pm ho

        “And Mr. backchecking didn’t “disagree much” with the earlier commenter: he trashed his statement utterly.

        Much like I’m doing to yours right now.”

        This is why you’re a degenerate shyster.

        Arbiter made a long comment giving his version of the decline of the (western) Roman empire. backchecking diagreed with a TINY part of that comment, that they were paid in salt and not in gold. You then claimed to agree with backchecking, but then corrected his correction of Arbiter, which completely invalidated your crowing about backchecking “sticking to facts”.

        In short, you’re exactly like a certain someone described a certain people to be in a certain book, when explaining how he grew to hate them.

        Yes I know, you’re not a Jew, we got it.

        LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 1:51 am whiskeysplace

      Fact, Western Europe when Rome fell was far less Christian, populated, or wealthy than the Eastern Roman Empire. Christianity in Britain for example ceased to exist until Alfred the Great converted in about 800 AD. When coins were finally reintroduced. Western Europe was pagan and nearly totally illiterate for 400-600 years or so.

      LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 3:31 am thwack

      Before that, there were mummies in Egypt with blond and red hair.
      —————————————————————————————

      Thats from dyeing it with henna and other chemicals.

      What color is Ramses the 2nds hair?

      It should be gray but its not.

      guess why?

      LikeLike


      • on April 23, 2014 at 1:30 am FamilyMan

        Prove it. Henna’s a weak hair color by today’s standards. It might be able to dye blond hair red, but black nappy hair?

        LikeLike


  51. on April 19, 2014 at 7:07 pm PA

    I’ve always hated nested comments structure.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 12:57 pm Diversity is Good

      Why?

      LikeLike


  52. on April 19, 2014 at 7:17 pm H

    The elites actions make sense if you realize they want to become a permanent aristocracy, possibly remaking the feudal system.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:33 pm backchecking

      The elites are as factious as any.

      Collectively, they DON’T plan ahead.

      Hence, the screwy world we live in.

      It is a fantasy that the Federal Reserve – or any other collective – is doing anything other than making things up as they go along.

      Take a look at the nature of all military campaigns.

      Master plans get shredded into dust all of the time.

      The really scary thing is to know that the brainiacs are as lost as you are.

      They just have press agents.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 3:37 pm Zombie Shane

        > “They just have press agents.”

        And a warchest of trillions upon trillions of dollars in fake money which they have been inventing out of thin air and distributing amongst themselves.

        LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:34 pm Zombie Shane

      > “possibly”

      Possibly?

      POSSIBLY?!?

      Jesus Christ, you’re still early on in your journey over to The Dark Side.

      Oh well, at least you’re on the right path.

      LikeLike


  53. on April 19, 2014 at 7:18 pm H

    OT: There’s a discussion in the comments of a Vox Popoli post about adult men wanting to bang 16 year old girls. A few are saying it’s fine, others are saying they are borderline pedos. What is the CH take on this? http://voxday.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-hollywood-mafia-in-media-crosshairs.html#comment-form

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:31 pm Zombie Shane

      > “What is the CH take on this?”

      That unless you are a prominent Frankfurt School potentate, like Roman Polansky, or Woody “Allen” Konigsberg, then you probably ought to keep your mouth shut about this shiznat.

      If you doubt me, then just look at how The Frankfurt School sicced its little sodomite toad, Andrew Sullivan, on John Derbyshire, when The Derb dared to broach this topic.

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:45 pm backchecking

      One of the first topics that intrigued anthropologist was the age of marriage across cultures.

      After studing the planet, the results showed that 98% of all societies known considered 16 to be the first appropriate year for a female to consumate marriage.

      No society was found to have a higher female age standard.

      Famously, in Shakespeare’s day, a girl was deemed an old hag if she reached 20 without being married off.

      Jewish custom dictated that it was a sin upon the PARENTS if they had not married off their sons and daughters before they reached the aged of 20.

      Life long (Jewish) bachelor status would’ve been shocking, embarrassing.

      How times change.

      &&&

      The female psyche is not built to be celibate.

      The epic amount of modern female slutting around is merely a displacement of her primal programming.

      Burning off her first, primary, childbearing years is a loser strategy for young women. There can be no compensation for the loss. None.

      LikeLike


  54. on April 19, 2014 at 7:56 pm H

    to add onto the above: http://gatesofvienna.net/2014/04/the-emotions-of-socialism/

    LikeLike


  55. on April 19, 2014 at 8:27 pm jube kibagami wanabe

    I wonder how the guys who wrote V for Vendetta knew back then that there would be false flag attacks to gain compliance and that America would slide into a long civil war…..if it does.

    Pretty good foresight, did they get their ideas from somewhere else?

    LikeLike


  56. on April 19, 2014 at 8:37 pm whorefinder

    PA, Piggy’s bootlicker, said:

    I’ve always hated nested comments structure.
    —No one cares what you think you, little braindead following fuck.

    LikeLike


  57. on April 19, 2014 at 9:00 pm I was3 goimh to the prencheer n\\mqn ti tek him

    Hey muumchilld. You are not up to speed. St Paul sais abut hisun ///

    LikeLike


  58. on April 19, 2014 at 9:18 pm sciences with lisps

    NPR’s boots-on-the-ground coverage of the Ukraine situation is actually pretty good. I’ve heard the guy there actually admit two different times he wasn’t sure Russia was organizing the counterrevolutionaries retaking government buildings back from the illegitimate coup government. I thought for sure he’d parrot the neocon/gaystream/sodomite Leftist narrative that it’s a bunch of Putin’s stooges doing it. And then they followed up with a story about how segregation is organically increasing in Amerika because free association, and how that’s baaaad, that’s so scawy and baaaaaad. Click.

    LikeLike


  59. on April 19, 2014 at 9:34 pm FoolishReporter

    Reblogged this on Foolish Reporter's Foolish Thoughts on the Foolish State of Things and commented:
    welp

    LikeLike


  60. on April 20, 2014 at 12:05 am Kim du Toit

    “I read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.”

    You are aware that the Protocols are a complete forgery, right? Written by Tsarist officials early in the 20th century. (And no, that’s not Jooooish propaganda; the book is nonsensical.)

    Reading the Protocols to learn about Jewry is like reading 1970s-era Pravda to learn about capitalism.

    But I suspect I’m wasting my time amongst the modern-day anti-Semites, a.k.a. International Union of Morons.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 12:28 pm BlackSun666

      Let it be known: Your intentions are fraudulent and hold no standing here. I already responded to one of your dishonorable intentions of arming emotionally unstable women with deadly implements…

      By their fruits, they shall be known. The Protocols are proceeding in a clearly outlined fashion, easily recognized in our current times. More is easily uncovered with the slightest research. Denial is not clever, nor ever will be.

      You have the nerve to come here and speak such untruths on one of the grandest days of history. Let your fate be dealt. So mote it be.

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 5:48 pm FoolishPride (@FoolishProud)

      You’re not screaming about the (oft-mocked in the real world) “Frankfurt School.”

      You need to do that.

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 6:57 pm corvinus

      Yet whoever wrote the Protocols got YKW psychology bang-on correct.

      It’s a “forgery” in the same sense an editorial cartoon is.

      LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 12:45 am paddy

      Let’s say it is 100% fiction. When you read it, do you feel it has demonstrated any predictive power? After all, when it was written, America was still on a gold and silver standard and there were relatively few (compared to today) “YKW’s”. Have you read it and pondered whether it accurately describes some of the mechanisms by which America is being subverted, whether by “X” or by someone else?

      LikeLike


    • on April 22, 2014 at 5:48 am bendy

      and yet a few years later….the czar and his family were murdered, by a jew, on the orders of other jews, in the midst of a “revolution” led by jews….

      LikeLike


  61. on April 20, 2014 at 12:27 am Nicole

    One of the reasons I enjoy reading this blog(aside from the useful tips on how to p/u women) is the political component included by the author(s). Lately,however, whatever the subject, the comment section has multiple anti Semitic rants. They did this, YKW did that, the holocaust never happened, it’s a conspiricy and they run everything, THEY are out to destroy us. In a blog dedicated to facing reality, I find this blatant denial of history and reality really odd. Where is your source of all this information? Did you just make it up? I would like to look at your source for all these claims, read it for myself. Please list your links,books or whatever so I can judge what it is that you’ve been consuming for myself. Because quite frankly, you sound like a bunch of conspiracy nuts..”Ohhhh, the Illuminati are running the planet” so enlighten me on your source material.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 10:44 am Anonymous

      Take your time:
      http://pastebin.com/W1hUpgr0
      http://pastebin.com/h3LjGJQd

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 1:58 pm Moonchild

      Ms Nicole please read in its entirety Henry Ford’s 4 volume series The International Jew published in 1920-1922 in the Dearborn Independent to read about his concern over the “Jewish Problem” as he saw it 93 years ago. Very enlightening to the brainwashed mind.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 4:58 pm backchecking

        Henry Ford – personality wise – is almost a clone of Jobs, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Gates and many another capitalist icon. That is to say, idiosyncratic, and fully taken with himself. And like all the rest, takes his success in one venue to mean that he has a much wider intellectual mastery.

        While Jews widely cite Ford as a raving anti-Semite, one should note that Ford hated just about everybody at one time or another – especially to include his son, Edsel. (What a name!)

        For a howling anti-Semite, why did he spend big bucks to take a Jewish woman to Europe (Norway) or her say-so that she and others could stop World War One?

        %%

        What’s next passed as common knowledge ninety-years ago – but now suppressed by YKW:

        1) Ford did not own Ford Motor free and clear. He had partners. At the top of the list were the Dodge brothers. Ford only owned 60%. The Dodges were the true inventors of the moving assembly line, not Ford. He was an old man sitting in the office by that time.

        2) Ford was so enthralled with his Model T he wouldn’t tolerate the Dodge’s insistence that a new design be launched. GM corporation was being assembled and as a collective was a serious threat to Ford Motor’s primacy.

        3) After an extremely bitter row, Ford broke with the Dodges and the rest. He moved to buy them out ON SHORT NOTICE.

        4) Ford Motor’s accounting was a HASH. He had more money coming in than he could count. (So he didn’t.) Consequently, he couldn’t go to Wall Street or Boston (State Street) and get the money.

        5) Fatefully he turned to Jewish HARD MONEY LENDERS, basically over fed pawnbrokers. Take a wild guess as to their ethics. (It was a blank book.)

        6) A totally Jewish lending syndicate was formed – practically overnight – as every Jew on the planet knew about Ford Motor – the single largest manufacturer on the globe. Rather than quibble, the Dodges, et. al. took the quick money – thus founding Dodge Motor Company. It was folded into Chrysler somewhat later.

        7) With the end of WWI, the economy went into a severe slump. The 1920-1921 being one of the most intense on record. President Harding cut taxes, cut spending – round and round. That’s why the US Army Air Corps had ten running planes in short order.

        8) The intense contraction didn’t held Model T sales at all. It was at this point that the Jewish lending syndicate made their move to take over ALL of Ford Motor Company. By the harsh terms of their loan, it was callable (instantly due in full) on short notice if certain conditions existed. So, at the VERY last moment, the Jewish syndicate leaders dropped their payment-in-full letter on Henry.

        9) He exploded. It was THIS EVENT that triggered his intstant anti-Semitism.

        10) The timing was perfect. It was terrible. Payment in full was due the first banking day in September. Historically, that was the traditionally tightest money point in the farm calendar. It was the traditional month for bank runs. (plus October) (Because of the farm economy and crop failures…)

        11) Ford’s brain trust pulled a rabbit out of the hat. Telegraphs were issued to every Ford dealer in the world that they’d HAVE to kick in a cash deposit by that magic date – or lose their dealership entirely – and forever. You see, Ford placed all of his cars on those lots “on the cuff.” He was their creditor. He made his problem their problem. Many dealers just happened to be the biggest client of the biggest bank in that town or city. Establishing a security interest in the cars on their lots was a snap.

        12) An epic tide of wire transfers poured in from across the planet that September. Western Union actually had to call boys out of bed to man every teletype in the office. This situation got back to the Jewish syndicate – quickly.

        13) So they were glum when Ford’s rep showed up with a monster cashier’s check/ wire transfer that cleared them out 100%. The recriminations started immediately. The subordinate members of the Jewish syndicate were furious that the New York boys had screwed up their dream asset. They’d been collecting big interest on a AAA credit. Henry was so fat that paying high interest was a small price for him to pay – to get rid of his pesky partner-crittics.

        14) Ford wenth on an anti-Semitic crusade immediately after these events. He only relented when his own Jewish dealers went to Dearborn and begged Henry to stop. He was killing their dealerships, and losing the argument in print. Immediately thereafter, Henry stopped his ‘newspaper.’

        So now you know why Ford started and stopped his anti-Semitic crusade – on a dime.

        BTW, many of the screeds in his rag were ghosted by real anti-Semits. He was not much of a writter and much too busy with Ford Motor. I have no doubt that a lot of those screeds came back to embarrass him – particularly with his Jewish dealers. With his pride and all, he tried to bury it. Suddenly, you just stopped hearing about his Jewish ‘problem.’

        Ford shifted his ire to bankers generally – after all of his dealers started to bitterly whine about how their (non-Jewish) bankers were just-as-bad as his Jewish bankers! Since they had to get their loans on short notice, they got harsh terms. They had to eat the expenses or bump the price of Model T’s up.

        That got Henry’s attention.

        So, WITH ITS OWN CLEAN BOOKS, he established Ford Motor Credit Corporation. Being auditable, FMCC was able to directly tap State Street insurance and pension monies. (Boston) The bankers were being cut-out entirely. The White Shoe boys were able to lend to a sparkling credit – in size – and get much better rates than lending to the US Treasury.

        FMCC then bought up all of the ‘wholesale paper’ (aka ‘flooring’) for its dealers. No dealer gets flooring from any other source. FMCC can’t be beat.

        Within months GMCC was established. Ford was just killing GM until they crafted their own clone.

        And, later, so did Chrysler. Today, no serious manufacturer of durables does not operate a dealer financing arm.

        Now you know where, why, when and how this became a corporate norm.

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 2:13 am Tim

        Why can’t all the comments here be that informative and interesting?

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 9:43 pm Anonymous

        By informative do you mean copy and pasted of the ADL’s website?

        LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 8:23 pm TZ

      You have to understand that a portion of the people who become Jew-aware has firstly fucked their head with other conspiracy theories – this doesn’t mean that there hasn’t existed such – and replacing Illuminati(for giggles visit VigilentCitizen – “symbols rule the world” – LOL!) or whatever else conspiracy with Jews. You can often recognize these people from the hopeless view that “all sides are controlled by Jews” which doesn’t seem be factual at all. They are still stuck in the conspiracy mindset which is obviously unhealthy. I don’t agree that there exist any grand Jewish conspiracy but we do live in somewhat Judaized West.

      They seem to mainly operate under question of “is it good for Jews?” (or just me and my smaller circle). The problem is way too many of these good for Jews policies are bad for Europeans and Europeans who speak against them gets media attacked and trashed. Whatever you may think of neo-nazis, skinheads and the less extreme groups they do have usually one thing in common: they’re all pro-white. You could for valid reasons argue that some of their ways are not the best way to express it but they surely ain’t ashamed of being who they are.

      Another thing with Jews is that they are not willing to assimilate into Europeans or just let it happen. http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/03/hypocrisy-in-action-the-non-response-to-avigdor-liebermans-speech-on-an-impending-jewish-demographic-catastrophe/

      Think if the Jews would just finally assimilate with Europeans… wouldn’t the ageless Jewish Question likely disappear? Or if Jews would change their modus operandi to “is it good for Europeans?”.

      If Italians are European which I think they’re. So are then Ashkenazi Jews which are the majority Jewish group. And most of the people think that Jews are white and can’t really tell them apart from other whites. I don’t have a problem if similar enough ethnic groups intermix with each others. Would I intentionally support and encourage mixture between Sicilians and Finnish? No but when such thing happens I don’t think it would create too much trouble for the relationship and most importantly for the child. Compared to those who are genetically far away from each others. http://sociobiologicalmusings.blogspot.fi/2011/10/problems-with-mixed-race-marriages-and.html
      https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9o3EYTdM8lQS2RlbmVLRjdTTzA/edit?pli=1

      Lastly to get an idea of some genetic distances

      How about Rothschild’s – as human as everyone else. Notice how beta the Jewish guy look? By the way, she isn’t the only Rothschild who has gone mudsharking. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2568763/Kate-Rothschild-heiress-rap-star-lover-photo-thats-alarmed-friends.html

      Since you like this site. You might find more interesting sites from the bottom of this site http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com – you may notice this site also gets mentioned. I frankly have no idea what majority of the sites are. Similarly with the Dark Enlightenment aka Neoreactionary. http://radishmag.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/scharlachs-visualizing-neoreaction.png

      Some sites that I know from the above list that are critical of Jewish issues are Occidental Observer and Counter Currents – also seen some such content on Radix Journal, TakiMag and VDare.

      LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 2:02 am whiskeysplace

        Jews certainly assimilated into Europe, Hitlers WWI commander was a Jew and the gas chambers were filled with Jews wearing their Iron Crosses. But as scapegoats for modernity anti semites found it useful to say murder Anne Frank and nearly all her family. Jews are dna wise Italians and ME. You dint get much Whiter. But Europeans love love love to slaughter each other and construct idiot conspiracy theories to avoid facing modernity, the Black Death (it was witches!) Etc. Jew hatred = European rivalry. Asians don’t care.

        LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 8:55 pm Nicole

      Thank you to those who responded. I will read your suggestions and links as time permits. @ backchecking, this sounds like an interesting story..where did your information come from? I’ve read some stuff about Ford but have never come across this.

      LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 6:28 pm backchecking

        Robert M McNamara — one of the ‘whiz kids’ was brought in by, IIRC, Henry Ford II to straighten out Ford Motor Company’s books — AFTER WWII. (!)

        That’s what a hash they were.

        Henry Ford II had much to say about the VERY strange goings on at Ford when he first moved to take over control.

        For all practical purposes, Henry had allowed gangsters to (essentially) take over Ford Motor… even as it was a prime defense contractor. (River Rouge — B24 production — one bomber per hour!)

        It’s movie worthy… could be a mini-series. The Ford Motor corporation does its best to derail ANY Hollywood notions of pursuing the story. It would be too damning of Henry Ford (founder) and would branch off into Irish and Jewish intrigues that have to be deemed politically incorrect. It would NOT help sales. As a monster advertiser, Ford is in a position to keep the matter largely buried.

        Contrast that with the Wolf of Wall Street — an outrageous character.

        So, there’s no doubt that Ford’s books were a total hash when the Dodge brothers wanted out from under Ford. (BTW, Henry didn’t believe in serious dividends, either. He was on a crusade to put every common American on wheels. THAT’S why all notions of building a more expensive car were anathema to him. He was the pope of Dearborn!)

        The start and stop date of his ‘newspaper’ are of record.

        The founding of FMCC is of record. Notably, it’s the FIRST such captive financing arm. It was cloned like CRAZY in the Roaring Twenties.

        It was THESE financing vehicles that made the Twenties roar. This is something TOTALLY over looked by modern scribes.

        Modern writers assume that these entities have been with America forever. They were MORE revolutionary than the moving assembly line. EVERY durable goods producer could establish one. (given national scale)

        These corporate creatures DEFINE what it is to be a big business. If you’ve got your own captive financial arm/ bank — no doubt about it — you’re a Big Business.

        As for the Jewish syndicate, you’d have to troll W A A Y back into the archives. YKW has totally suppressed the naughty tale.

        Those hard money lenders (scaled up pawnbrokers) are EXACTLY the ‘Jewish Bankers’ ™ that prior generations railed about.

        The Dodge brothers split and the corporate row is on the record. Be my guest.

        The astounding wire transfers were the talk of the (business) nation at the time. America actually had a double banking system. It’s politically incorrect to talk or write about it — now.

        You had the Jewish network: todays pawnbrokers (75% Jewish if not more) are a legacy of that time. They are also deeply over represented in (collectible) coin dealing, hawking precious metals, and, of course, they have a monopoly on the wholesale diamond trade and a massive representation in the retail jewelry trade. (Guess why it’s called Jewelry… the original term meant, more or less, ‘Jewish craft/ art/ manufacture.’ The diamond trade would evaporate over night without its Jewish importer-distribution chain.)

        In contrast you had the Goyim network. Generally speaking, the Goys would never extend credit to Jewish bankers. It was THIS bitter divide that triggered the fullness of the Great Depression.

        In point of fact, the Great Depression started in LATE 1930. The horrific tumble of Wall Street meant nothing to the larger economy. The money supply was not super contracting, employment was okay, prices were merely soft.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_United_States

        Then a bank run started at the (famously Jewish) Bank of United States. The details are well recounted by Milton Friedman. The upshot, a cascade of banking failures – starting in the JEWISH banking wing. At the crisis hour the Goyim would not extend over-night credit to the BoUS – for the reasons detailed here. The Protestants assumed that any fall out would be contained. (And they didn’t even know what fall out was.)

        It wasn’t. It cascaded into run after run after run. It was THESE BANK RUNS that launched the Greatness of the Depression.

        Modern money starts life as a commercial bank loan… not the printing press.

        So the destruction of so many banks shut down the engine of money creation. Of course, outstanding debts still had to be paid. So the system wide level of debt – and debt-monies shrank with each passing day. Cascading defaults and layoffs resulted.

        &&&

        And in a similar vein, J C Penny was founded as a Goyim/ Jew-free retail enterprise. That such was its purpose was made explicit in the 19th Century.

        Prior to J C Penny (Like those initials?) retail sales in America were virtually a Jewish monopoly. Today, Hollywood has morphed this history into falsehood. (eg You NEVER see Hollywood westerns portraying the general store merchant and owner as being Jewish. They are always portrayed by flamingly Goy Protestants. Such is a total falsehood.)

        I give you:

        Pale Rider
        Shane…

        In all cases the Jewish general store owners had started out as peddlers. They’d stop and set up shop under a tree and tent whenever, wherever it made practical sense. With failure, they’d just move on. If gold or silver was struck – this was their magic moment.

        My childhood neighbors were descendants of a peddler that owned most of Anaconda, Montana – from exactly this sequence. They never needed to work again.

        In conjunction with such general stores, credit was extended. Prices were scarcely negotiable.

        This Jewish hyper concentration is still in evidence across the malls of America. It’s taboo to bring up this ethnic concentration. It is, however, off the charts.

        J C Penny went on a crusade (starting in Indian, IIRC) to create a Christian (ie Goy) retail network – as the Jews universally excluded Christians from retailing. (when and where possible) They did not disclose their trade secrets. (Most dealing is actually done after Temple – to this day.)

        J C Penny established, for all practical purposes, the modern franchise system. He indoctrinated worthy Christians into the ways and means of retailing nickel and dime manufactures. His timing was perfect. He became a multi-millionaire. (A fair amount of multi-level marketing was involved, too. Dealers could get spiffs/ kick-backs by introducing a worthy new dealer. Today most would never know that J C Penny started out largely as a franchise scheme.)

        The religious feud aspect of the retail marketplace is now Politically Incorrect.

        So, it didn’t happen.

        LikeLike


  62. on April 20, 2014 at 1:20 am dick fuel

    fellowphysician my year tookda smv male test

    married guy 6 4″ for 6 yrs thought he was cocksure full on alpha

    his attitudinal enthusiasm waned after 10th question

    meh

    LikeLike


  63. on April 20, 2014 at 1:55 am Director

    In the 1970s the the USSR was engaged in a Cold War with Capitalism. In the 1970s Capitalism was at war with the USSR. Are you implying that Jewery is to Western Civilization as Communism is to Capitalism? Do you admit that there is a struggle going on?

    Quite the Freudian slip my Kim.

    LikeLike


  64. on April 20, 2014 at 2:01 am Director

    Wait, so the Cold War, a very real struggle for world domination, is similar to the Czarist regime’s conflict with Jews? Kim, you opened up a whole can of worms there.

    Your 2nd amendment bluster and your grasp of its origins, combined with your naïveté are touching.

    LikeLike


  65. on April 20, 2014 at 2:05 am Director

    Look what happened to the Czar Kim De Toit!

    Do you have something against the Czars? Any axe to grind about how your ancestors were confined to the Pale? (An area four times the size of Texas).

    LikeLike


  66. on April 20, 2014 at 2:11 am Carlos Danger

    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=534

    Re: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. They are not a forgery. The link above explains why. Brother Nathaniel’s article is below.

    EMERGING FROM DEEP SECRECY, portions of the Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion were brought to light in the late 19th Century in France.

    It is a fascinating story, presented here in a unique, unprecedented and thoroughly documented fashion. Months of intense research has gone into this work.

    In 1884, a Mademoiselle Justine Glinka, the daughter of a Russian general, was engaged in Paris in gathering political information for the court of Tzar Alexander III.

    Glinka employed a Jewish agent named Joseph Schoerst, alias Shapiro, who had passed himself off as a Freemason and a member of the Mizraim Lodge, a Jewish Masonic order with its own particular rites and protocols. None other than Solomon Rothschild, scion of the Jewish banking dynasty, was a prominent member of the French Freemasons.

    Schoerst offered to Glinka for the sum of 2,500 francs, a document which he said would interest her greatly. This document contained extraordinary dictated writings from assorted speeches which would later be included in the final compilation of the Protocols of Zion.

    Glinka quickly passed the document to her immediate superior in Paris, General Orgeyevski, who sent them, in turn, to General Cherevin, Minister of the Interior, for transmission directly to the Imperial Court in St Petersburg.

    Upon Cherevin’s death in 1896, he willed a copy of his memoirs containing the Protocols to Tzar Nicholas II. (View Sources Here, Here & Here.)

    Glinka’s information eventually found its way into the hands of one Sergei Nilus, a highly educated Russian mystic attached to Tsar Nicholas II’s court who served as Minister of Foreign Religions.

    In 1902, Nilus published, “The Rule of Satan on Earth – Notes of an Orthodox Believer,” in which he cites excerpts from this early aggregation of the material first purchased by Madame Glinka.

    Next stop for the Protocols occurred in 1903 when a prominent publisher by the name of Pavel Krusheva quoted writings from the Protocols in his daily newspaper, Znamya. After its publication, Krusheva suffered an attempt on his life and from that moment on, he lived in constant fear and had to carry weapons for his own protection. He also took the step of being accompanied by a personal cook to prevent being poisoned.

    In 1905, Sergei Nilus published a new edition of his “Rule of Satan” which included a complete version of the Protocols as the final chapter. This was the first time a full compilation of the Protocols had been made available to the general public in book form.

    In 1917, (the same year of the final Russian Revolution), Nilus had prepared a final edition – fully documented – but before he could distribute it, Kerensky, a half-Jew, who had succeeded to power after the Revolution, had most of the copies destroyed. Anyone caught by the Bolsheviks in possession of The Protocols was shot on the spot.

    In 1918, the Protocols appeared again in a Moscow periodical, The Sentinel, marked by the Jewish-led Bolsheviks as a counter-revolutionary newspaper. In February, 1919, the Bolsheviks ordered the newspaper shut down.

    In 1924, Professor Nilus was arrested by the Jewish-dominated “Cheka,” imprisoned, and then tortured. He was told by the president of the court (who was Jewish) that this treatment was meted out to him for “having done them (the Zionist Bolshevik Jews) incalculable harm in publishing the Protocols.” (View Sources Here, Here, Here, Here, Here & Here.)

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 12:33 pm BlackSun666

      Eh… If you wanted the real story, you’d be better served by seeking out a URL that is the same as my username. Brother Nathaniel is a schmuck. (Read: Yiddish for penis.)

      LikeLike


  67. on April 20, 2014 at 3:04 am quasi

    “43 percent of millennial adults are non-white, making this the most diverse generation in America.”

    ‘Murrica! Fucked, yeah?

    On the bright side, that’s what you could call ‘a target-rich environment’.

    LikeLike


  68. on April 20, 2014 at 3:44 am Social Distrust Is Way Up Among Millennials | T...

    […] As reported by NPR (I’m sure with gritted teeth), a Pew Study finds that the milliennial generation has a low level of social trust. There are several possible causes for this distrust, including a skewed social media culture and a faltering economy.  […]

    LikeLike


  69. on April 20, 2014 at 8:06 am Director

    * .22s don’t count: they are household appliances, not guns.

    Kim is a phony. This blustering mental nugget made me laugh.

    LikeLike


  70. on April 20, 2014 at 8:27 am Testosterone-Filled EASTER EGGS | About Lifting

    […] one of my favorites from the Chateu, says Jesus had game. Yup Jesus was the most influential men of all time and that is because he had […]

    LikeLike


  71. on April 20, 2014 at 8:31 am Director

    On the .22

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Robert_F._Kennedy

    If you are a beginner .22 is a very good way to practice and get comfortable. It’s also a perfect close quarter assassination method. Just brandishing a pistol and firing a .22 will probably clear a mob attack.

    LikeLike


  72. on April 20, 2014 at 9:20 am Rum

    Regarding the Protocols: In what Universe would a person in possession of such a document not just find a printer and sell copies and get rich if its contents were so compelling? In the late 19th century, it was already absurd to speak of bequeathing a document in ones will as if the piece of paper itself had value. There were printers all over in those days. Many of them were located in countries that were no friends of the Juus and would have delighted in this revelation.
    The Czar and his family were killed because that is what always happens when a royal dynasty is overthrown with extreme violence.Failure to do this makes a return of the royals to power all that much more likely.
    America was incredibly lucky that G. Washington had no biological sons. A lot of potential unpleasantness was avoided.

    LikeLike


  73. on April 20, 2014 at 9:45 am Moonchild

    In 1921, Ford cited evidence of a Jewish threat: “The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are 16 years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time.”

    LikeLike


  74. on April 20, 2014 at 10:33 am Dragases

    I just had an awesome first date last night and now I’m completely smitten and head over heels all over again. She is beautiful and our conversation flows naturally without my needing to think about what I’m going to say. The chemistry between us is very tangible.

    Am I addicted to the ‘falling in love’ effect? Having a great evening with a great younger woman sends an unbelievable amount of dopamine coursing through my brain. It is life affirming and validating to be able to drive back home and reflect on what just transpired.

    I better be careful and not get Oneitis again, like I did with my last Oneitis (I’ll keep my FWB around this time,. if only to create a feeling of abundance). I’ll keep my game tight and I’ll make her work for my romantic gestures. At least now I have the experience to be able to not fall into the traps that will come my way.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 10:47 am Zombie Shane

      > “Having a great evening with a great younger woman sends an unbelievable amount of dopamine coursing through my brain.”

      God created you to be that way precisely so that YOU WOULD WANT TO PUT BUNS IN HER OVEN.

      Now go get busy with the putting.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 10:57 am PA

        +1
        Eye on the prize

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 1:14 pm whorefinder

        Your eye is on Piggy’s shriveled ballsack, beta bitch.

        Rape!

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 1:41 pm PA

        You’re clearly still angry about how I tooled you at GLP two years ago.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 2:13 pm whorefinder

        You clearly can’t figure out how to use the reply button correctly. And are clearly upset that I’m still calling you out for being a sad-sack apologist for a confirmed charlatan.

        PA rape!

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 3:24 pm Zombie Shane

        WTF are you two talking about?

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:55 pm PA

        The Whorefinder is a funny little dwarf. Best game in town when it comes to anti-simianism. Other than that though… a sad state of affairs. He said that CR (GLP) is his libertarian god. Until he no longer was. The Whorefidner and I clashed over there a few years ago — I argued that the GOP has its problems, to say the least, The Whorefinder slobbered on Karl Rove’s fat flaccid weenie. A flamewar ensued, and I tooled the funny little dwarf so bad, he left the blog.

        All that said, I think he is a funny guy, and I remain a fan of The Whorefinder.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 3:08 pm culprette

        You’re free to make 1000 babies yourself to make up for any shortfalls, if diversity bugs you so much –
        LOL Hell have you gotten even ONE white woman to have yer kid ?

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 3:28 pm Kim du Toit

        LOL culprette. Of course he hasn’t. I believe one has to reach puberty first in order to procreate.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 3:46 pm Tim

        Spot on

        LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 12:18 pm Tilikum

      just stop. women are 100% interchangable

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 2:14 pm whorefinder

        “They’re all the same upside down”
        —whorefinder’s old sports’ coach.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 11:15 pm Tilikum

        or standing on their head….

        LikeLike


  75. on April 20, 2014 at 10:54 am Director

    The Czar was at war with the Jews in the Pale.

    The rather abrupt assassination and disolution of the institution of the Czar (Autocrator) need not have resulted in the USSR. Truly a disgusting Satanic enterprise.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 4:01 pm backchecking

      The “Pale of Russia” was established by the Tsar FOR the Jews. Generally, the Pale was in the west, and constituted (relatively) recently conquered territories. (Moscovy was entirely outside the Pale, of course.)

      A Jew was dependent upon the Tsar’s permission if he went “beyond the Pale.”

      And some Jews did exactly that. They were invariably on the Tsar’s payroll — one way or another. Typically, they’d be involved in ‘sticky’ negotiations and trade with Europeans in such demeaning matters as objects of trade… like diamonds, furs, and whatnot.

      It was a craft that self-selected for brains, language and guile.

      As for being against the Tsar, perish the thought.

      The perpetual beef that Russian Jewry had with the Tsar was that as an absolute monarch his policies could not be moderated. So what happened is that living and economic conditions swung all over the place depending on exactly who was Tsar.

      Further, the Pale was the LAST place that any Tsar wanted to spend on infrastructure. The result was that Jews in the Pale saw every other European Jew pulling away economically — and knew all about how badly they, themselves, were getting screwed. Is it any wonder you had mass emigration to America?

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 4:21 pm Zombie Shane

      You don’t even have to go as far away as the Czar to get examples of this.

      Our very own President McKinley was murdered by a disciple of Alexander Berkman and Emma Goldman.

      Berkman had previously been in prison for attempting to murder Harvey Firestone.

      And after Presiden’t McKinley’s murder, Goldman not only refused to apologize for her student, she instead lavished praise upon him.

      Theodore Roosevelt – who was normally an extraordinarily insightful fellow – made a catastrophic blunder in dealing with the Frankfurt School, by failing to hang Goldman, and instead merely deporting her back to Europe.

      If we had dealt with the Frankfurt School firmly and decisively from the very beginning, then we wouldn’t be in nearly the world of hurt which we find ourselves today.

      LikeLike


  76. on April 20, 2014 at 12:00 pm Kim du Toit

    “Look what happened to the Czar Kim De Toit! Do you have something against the Czars? Any axe to grind about how your ancestors were confined to the Pale?”

    As far as I know, the French Huguenots (my actual ancestors) were not confined to the Pale by the Czar. But thinking that would about sum up your grasp of history (which is: non-existent).

    @Nicole: “Lately,however, whatever the subject, the comment section has multiple anti Semitic rants…. Where is your source of all this information?”

    Nicole, there is no historical basis for their anti-Semitism. It’s all conspiracist nonsense, which is the traditional refuge of beta losers.

    I can’t wait for some other moron to accuse the Joooos of baking cakes with the blood of children (like the Palestinians — who are surely the poster children of beta losers — assert).

    When people can’t cut it on their own, it always makes them feel better if they are told that someone else is responsible for their shortcomings — the Joooos, the Illuminati, the Freemasons, the Jesuits, the Knights Templar, pick your bogeyman — and of course it works especially well when the hopeless betas are historically illiterate, like many of the anti-Semitic commenters on this site. If you don’t know shit about actual history, you’ll believe any old crap you’re told, especially when it seems to confirm your own pathetic experience of failure. Hitler knew this, and provided the defeated Germans with a convenient (and historical) scapegoat: the Jooos. Now, as always, the Perpetual Losers need a bogeyman conspiracy to blame for their own misfortunes: the Jooos (again), the 1%, the Banksters, the Tea Party, the Fundies, pick your flavor — all because they feel hopeless about losing. But it’s so much better if “somebody else” is causing your failure rather than you yourself, isn’t it?

    It makes me chuckle, especially when all the venom is spat out by people hiding behind Internet nicknames — they aren’t man enough to put their real names behind their bullshit, because they’re affwwwaid of the potential consequences. Losers AND cowards; it’s not a pleasant combination.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 1:23 pm Bardon

      Although I agree that anti-Semitic nonsense (Frankfurt school decisive influence myth included) flooding CH is detrimental, it seems to me that you (and other rational posters) frequently neglect Jewish- speaking in Jungian terms- “shadow”, i.e. irritating & destructive forces inherent in Jewish national culture. First of all, it’s extreme ethnocentrism, unparalleled in world history (much more important peoples like ancient Greeks & the Chan Chinese were naturally ethnocentric, but without such an extremism & self-obsession); then, you got obscurantism as a “trademark” of Jewish culture from ca. 700 BC to their Enlightenment (Haskala) at the end of the 18th C. That’s why Voltaire, Goethe & numerous other European intellectuals harbored strong aversion toward Jews (they were, in their eyes, something like Talibans & aggressive contemporary “dirty Arabs”); also, Jewish huckstering, usury, “Middle eastern leeches” etc. angered European left (for instance, Marx’s “On the Jewish Question”),….. In the contemporary US, it’s Jewish grip on most influential media, their victim card & emotional blackmail in social discourse, their aligning with anti-white/European currents (Tim Wise, SPLC, their voting patterns,…). For one pro- European Jew, you’ll find 100 pro-multicult advocates of mass non-white immigration & demonization of European history & heritage. Mahler and Milhaud are continuation of European musical tradition. And Gershwin is …?

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 1:48 pm Kim du Toit

        Bardon: mostly good points. Jewish clannishness is one of the ethnic characteristics that have irritated people for centuries. I don’t neglect that clannishness, though; I just ignore it.

        Why? Because it’s marketing. How do you make people keep using a product? By saying that not everyone can have it — but you can because you’re special (okay, chosen by God). How do you justify living in ethnically-exclusive enclaves? By saying that other people put you there (and to be honest, Jews do have a point in this regard). There’s also safety in numbers: if there’s a group of you, you’re less vulnerable than you are as individuals.

        Once you accept that Jewish clannishness is simply a Judaic marketing ploy and a response to being persecuted, it becomes a non-issue. There is no “Jewish question”, other than, “How the hell does a tribe excel so much in a specific field?” (Answer: because they work hard, and the group both treasures and rewards excellence — hence high Jewish graduation rates in college and disproportionate representation in certain businesses, such as the media and finance.)

        As for playing the victim card: yes, Jews play that card often. But let’s be just a little charitable and allow a some historical perspective, too. Whenever things have gone wrong, all through history, the Jews have constantly become a convenient scapegoat — mostly, unjustifiably so. Yes, sometimes Jews wield a disproportionate influence on U.S. policy in the Middle East — but so what? Who’s the better horse to back: the democratic, frequently attacked Jews, with a religion which, like it or not forms one of the bases of Western civilization and a centuries-long record of achievement; or do we support the murderous Muslims, with their backward, intolerant and oppressive religion and a centuries-long heritage of failure and rapine? Who’s the better: the group who says, “You can’t join our religion, it’s a closed shop” or the group who says, “Join our religion or we’ll kill you”?

        The above questions are meant to be rhetorical, but I fear that someone will attempt to justify Option B in both, with no justfication other than “eeeevil Joos and conspiracy!”

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 9:35 pm ho

        “the democratic, frequently attacked Jews, with a religion which, like it or not forms one of the bases of Western civilization and a centuries-long record of achievement; or do we support the murderous Muslims, with their backward, intolerant and oppressive religion and a centuries-long heritage of failure and rapine? Who’s the better: the group who says, “You can’t join our religion, it’s a closed shop” or the group who says, “Join our religion or we’ll kill you”?”

        Just curious: in what parrallel universe does Talmudism form one of the bases of the western civilisation? Furthermore, has it ever ocurred to you that muslims want to murder Jews in the middle east because, maybe, they deserve it? If a bunch of loathsome Europeans (who were kicked out even there) came and took away a fairly large chunk of my lands while following it up with some of the most disgusting policies, I would probably do the same.

        And that bullshit about Islam being a “backward and intolerant oppressive religion” is funny as well. Newsflash, dipshit: fundamentally speaking, Islam, Christianity and Judaism are very similar. I’m not sure if you knew, but there were those things called Inquisition, withc hunts and crusades in Europe. Medieval Christians were every bit as barbaric, if not more barbaric than modern Muslims. How does your pea brain explain this?

        Your myopic understanding of history is also laughable. From the rise of Islam until the middle of the last millennium, Islam was the DOMINANT civilization in the world, both culturally and scientifically. Muslims scholars were laughing at the barbarism of Christian witch doctors.

        ““Join our religion or we’ll kill you”?””

        You could read one, just one surah of the Quran to understand that you’re a mentally underdeveloped useful idiot that knows nothing. Islam permits discriminating against non believers. What it doesn’t permit is a “convert or die” strategy. “There is no force in belief” and “Allah doesn’t love those who transgress”. One is only supposed to kill infidels if they transgress first and to cease if they ceased.

        In short, eat some buckshot.

        LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 10:21 am Bardon

        Like sex & taxes, “Joos” seem to be a perennial theme.

        As far as Jewish ethnocentrism goes- it’s the cornerstone of their religion & identity (which has been formed from, roughly, 700 BC to 100 AD). It is not a reaction, but the very essence of self- definition of that ethno-religious group & culture.

        As for accomplishment: now, Jews, this old & talented ethno-religious group is in the great creative period of their existence, which lasts as yet ca. 150-200 years. Many other groups or peoples have had such periods- Italians, say, 1300-1600; English up and down, but let’s take a look at 1550-1750 period. During this time, the English had produced: Tallis, Byrd, Purcell- composers, Boyle (Irish extraction)- father of chemistry, Shakespeare, Milton, Donne, …-literature, Bacon, Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley-philosophy, Gilbert- discovered magnetism, Harvey- physiology, blood circulation, Newton- the greatest scientist ever, Halley- astronomy, Cavendish- physics & chemistry, discovered hydrogen, ..
        So, just in this 200 years span the English had created enormously more than Jews in past 200 years. And- what does this have to do with IQ & other stuff ? Nothing.
        Jews last for ca. 3000 yrs; English, French & Germans for ca. 1000 (even less, as crystallized groups).
        Almost all historical figures, from ancient Greece & Rome to Goethe and Voltaire, had castigated Jews as vulgar, unoriginal, barbaric, sneaky, cunning but without nobility of spirit, essentially not creative. Not some Christian fanatics, but enlightened spirits. Until 1933. the only philo-Semitic creative persons were, as I recall, George Eliot and James Joyce. All others (Marx, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Wittgenstein, Wagner, Voltaire, Proust, Henry James, Nietzsche (a complex question), Chesterton, ..) were, to say the least, not very sympathetic. Ludwig Wittgenstein, one of the greatest 20th century philosophers-partly of Jewish extraction- complained about what he (wrongly) perceived as his creative sterility as having something to do with Jewishness: “Amongs Jews, “genius” is found only in the holy man. Even the greatest of Jewish thinkers is no more than talented. (Myself, for instance). I think there is some truth to the idea I only think reproductively. I don’t think I have ever invented a single line of thinking. I have always taken one from someone else ..”

        Now, that’s too harsh, but has an element of truth. Judaism is imaginatively refurbishing of other Near Eastern religions; it does not possess its own mythology. Or, in more recent times: enormously influential & erudite Marx was a sort of Talmudist (he was not technically Jewish, but..), reworking other people’s ideas (Ricardo, Hegel, Hess, Guizot, …) into one big synthesis; Freud was a mixture of Janet, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer and Shakespeare; Einstein’s SR was almost completely done in works of Lorentz, Poincare and others, and his GR was actually devised parallel with Hilbert; Feynman’s graph approach was invented by Dirac (Feynman said so himself).

        I don’t want to denigrate Jewish creativity in past 150 years in various fields, just- it could flourish only in the broader context of Gentile creativity & frequently- not always- after it. Jews’ creative accomplishments last some 150 years & are, mostly, the result of complete assimilation into host cultures, with characteristic traits of these cultures.

        LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 4:46 pm ho

      Kim I’m literally not even kidding that you deserve to be sent into the gas chamber.

      Yours is the worst kind of cockroach and it’s my hope that the day will come when your kind will be sent to the ovens again.

      Btw, why in the seven hells of tartarus should anyone use their real names in a world when saying that A = A is “bigotry”?

      And your imbecilic arguments against “antisemitism” are also cute. Has it ever ocurred to you that Germans hated kikes because, well, they were really loathesome? It was Jews and Jewish “intellectuals” who sought to turn Germany into a communist country. As an anti communist and nationalist, he would naturally hate Jews.

      What is also idiotic is the “you can’t cut it on your own and this is why you blame the Jews” argument.

      Do you honestly believe that anyone here blames kikes for their lack of success? What we DO blame them for is the fact that they are vermin that keep the country in their stranglehold and aggressively degrade western culture. If you weren’t a dissembling, shambling shoggoth, you would see that this is the case.

      it is ALMOST ALWAYS a Jew when you think “…REALLY?” after seeing the degeneracy claiming one more yard. When you see the tranny camp that “allow children to be what they want” (turning them into transsexuals) you’re not suprised to read “Rosenberg” under the article that portrays it positively. You’re not suprised to read that the man who positively reports a bunch of unintelligent savages “debating” in the finals of a debate tournament by panting, speedreading and rapping (“Fuck the time”) is named Schatz.

      But hey, at least you don’t have to be on bad terms with your Jewish friends right?

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:30 pm Kim du Toit

        “Kim I’m literally not even kidding that you deserve to be sent into the gas chamber.”

        @ho: Anytime you want to knock on my door to fulfil your desire to load me onto the cattle train to Auschwitz, feel free to do so. Bring some of your like-minded friends, to make it more interesting. Also, guns. Lots of guns.

        And I’m not kidding, either.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:42 pm Moonchild

        LOL the shill is turning into the internet tough guy. Looks like we’re getting to him.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:55 pm Kim du Toit

        Damn it, my dog isn’t listening to me.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 10:46 pm oralc

        Are you whiskey? So now you’re French???

        LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 3:42 am thwack

      the Joooos, the Illuminati, the Freemasons, the Jesuits, the Knights Templar, pick your bogeyman
      ———————————————————————————-

      big black cock

      LikeLike


  77. on April 20, 2014 at 12:34 pm Kim du Toit

    @Director: “If you are a beginner .22 is a very good way to practice and get comfortable. It’s also a perfect close quarter assassination method. Just brandishing a pistol and firing a .22 will probably clear a mob attack.”

    The .22 is a perfect way to practice — it’s why I shoot off about a thousand rounds of .22 a month, every month, and it is a good assassin’s weapon (but only at close quarters, delivered into the back of the head from a distance of inches — anything other than the head, and a kill is by no means certain). The .22 is also good with pests (rats, gophers etc), but that’s about as far as it goes — or else the .22 would be the sidearm of choice for the armed forces and police. It isn’t, because it’s an ineffective self-defense cartridge. (If you have nothing else, of course, it beats nothing, but that’s about as far as it goes.)

    As a veteran of both army combat and many hundreds of shooting competitions (IDPA, 3-gun etc), I actually do know quite a lot about the shooting business — more, I suspect, than many commenters here — and I repeat: the .22 is an okay gun to have around the house, but it is sadly insufficient in circumstances of extreme danger, such as a mass attack by Zombies or Joooos (LOL). In situations such as those, nothing beats a shotgun, a semi-suto rifle (like an AK-47, my personal favorite), or a large-caliber handgun, in that order.

    Having seen at first hand the effects of cartridges such as the 12-gauge, the .308 Win/7.62x51mm, the 7.62x39mm and the .45 ACP on human flesh, let me assure you that the tiny .22 is no match for any of those. “Brandishing” a .22 pistol may (may) suffice to cause an attacker to pause; but if it doesn’t, you’d be far better off with something a little more effective, such as any of the above calibers.

    Day-to-day, I carry either a 1911 in.45 ACP or a .357 Mag revolver, with a .38 Special snubbie as backup. Next to the bed I keep a .357 revolver and a shotgun; and if I can get to the gun safe, I can make use of still more serious stuff. That’s for self/home defense. In the unlikely case of civil disorder, I can add an AK-47 to the above; and in the very unlikely event that I really need to reach out and touch someone, several scoped bolt-action rifles are loaded and ready.

    Yes, I take self-defense seriously — every man should — and honestly, a .22 doesn’t cut the mustard. It is, as I said, more of a household appliance than a serious protection device, and .22 ammo should be regarded as a household staple like sugar or salt. (I keep many pounds of sugar and salt in reserve, and at least 20,000 rounds of .22 likewise.)

    You may disagree with any or all of the above statements; but among serious shooters (and not armchair gunslingers), not many would, But hey, talk is cheap: feel free to take issue with me. I can argue the point all day — and have, back when I had my own gun blog. Chances are, though, that you’ll just be showing your ignorance.

    LikeLike


  78. on April 20, 2014 at 1:53 pm Director

    Kim,

    Cool your jets dude, you are protesting too much.
    Your guff about .22 not counting is a sure sign of a bullshitter who thinks he knows the speak.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 2:17 pm Kim du Toit

      @Director: “If you are a beginner .22 is a very good way to practice and get comfortable. It’s also a perfect close quarter assassination method. Just brandishing a pistol and firing a .22 will probably clear a mob attack.”

      The .22 is a perfect way to practice — it’s why I shoot off about a thousand rounds of .22 a month, every month, and it is a good assassin’s weapon (but only at close quarters, delivered into the back of the head from a distance of inches — anything other than the head, and a kill is by no means certain). The .22 is also good with pests (rats, gophers etc), but that’s about as far as it goes — or else the .22 would be the sidearm of choice for the armed forces and police. It isn’t, because it’s an ineffective self-defense cartridge. (If you have nothing else, of course, it beats nothing, but that’s about as far as it goes.)

      As a veteran of both army combat and many hundreds of shooting competitions (IDPA, 3-gun etc), I actually do know quite a lot about the shooting business — more, I suspect, than many commenters here — and I repeat: the .22 is an okay gun to have around the house, but it is sadly inadequate in circumstances of extreme danger, such as a mass attack by Zombies or Joooos (LOL). In situations such as those, nothing beats a shotgun, a semi-suto rifle (like an AK-47, my personal favorite), or a large-caliber handgun, in that order.

      Having seen at first hand the effects of cartridges such as the 12-gauge, the .308 Win/7.62x51mm, the 7.62x39mm and the .45 ACP on human flesh, let me assure you that the tiny .22 is no match for any of those. “Brandishing” a .22 pistol may (may) suffice to cause an attacker to pause; but if it doesn’t, you’d be far better off with something a little more effective, such as any of the above calibers.

      Day-to-day, I carry either a 1911 in.45 ACP or a .357 Mag revolver, with a .38 Special snubbie as backup. Next to the bed I keep a .357 revolver and a shotgun; and if I can get to the gun safe, I can make use of still more serious stuff. That’s for self/home defense. In the unlikely case of civil disorder, I can add an AK-47 to the above; and in the very unlikely event that I really need to reach out and touch someone, several scoped bolt-action rifles are loaded and ready.

      Yes, I take self-defense seriously — every man should — and honestly, a .22 doesn’t cut the mustard. It is, as I said, more of a household appliance than a serious protection device, and .22 ammo should be regarded as a household staple like sugar or salt. (I keep many pounds of sugar and salt in reserve, and at least 20,000 rounds of .22 likewise.)

      You may disagree with any or all of the above statements; but among serious shooters (and not armchair gunslingers), not many would, But hey, talk is cheap: feel free to take issue with me. I can argue the point all day — and have, back when I had my own gun blog and forum. Chances are, though, that you’ll just be showing your ignorance.

      LikeLike


  79. on April 20, 2014 at 2:00 pm Director

    Let’s test Kim,

    Who said this?

    “Si Dieu me prête vie, je ferai qu’il n’y aura point de laboureur en mon royaume qui n’ait les moyens d’avoir le dimanche une poule dans son pot.”

    And why did he say it? Hugenot, my pale Irish arse.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 2:15 pm Kim du Toit

      Henry of Navarre (Henri IV). But I fail to see why this has any bearing on my Huguenot ancestry. Talking about a promise of “a chicken in every pot” has nothing to do with the topic under discussion. Oh, wait: it’s a tangential argument, meant to distract from the main point. Never mind. And for the record, I’m actually an atheist, so sectarian quibbles have little effect on me.

      And @Director, I actually do know the speak. Ask around. Of your record as a combat vet, hunter or competitive shooter, I know nothing.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 2:24 pm Moonchild

        Hey Kim if you want to be a disinfo shill go post on cnn. Your deception is not welcome here scum.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 2:35 pm Kim du Toit

        “Disinfo”? LOL

        I’m not the one quoting anti-Semitic, proven-to-be-false nonsense. That would have been more like CNN.

        Also @Moonchild: nice nickname. Very hippie and childlike.

        Next up: people are going to start insulting my mother. Why not? It always worked SO well on the playground, of which many of you have MUCH more recent memories than I..

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 2:42 pm Moonchild

        Yeah because the Jewish owned CNN brings any attention to the presence of Jewry’s control over the international financial system. No, they’re more about the “missing” Malaysian plane. Go away shill.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 2:59 pm Kim du Toit

        Oh God. I think I’ll go and argue with my dog why it’s not a good thing to crap on the rug. Ultimately, it would be more productive than interacting with twerps like you.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 6:53 pm Zombie Shane

        Meir Henoch Mojszewicz Wallach-Finkelstein:

        “WELL, THERE IS NO HUNGER.”

        http://www.garethjones.org/published_articles/st_patricks/litvinov_famine_denia_oldl.htm

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 3:31 pm Moonchild

        The shill just put the quote into google and the answer is easily reached. Put no stock in anything the above shill says he is strictly is liar and a disinfo agent.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 4:35 pm ho

        I would calm down with the “he’s an agent” shit. Let’s stick to the facts: he is most likely your average philosemite shyster. Disinfo agents typically stick to /pol/.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 4:59 pm Kim du Toit

        No, I’m actually an agent of the Zionist-Illuminati-CNN-Hollywood Conspiracy, sent here to spread my neo-Semitic lies and disinfo. (“Philosemite shyster”? You’re not even 50% correct. Do you guys even stop to think about the insults you spew? The evidence would suggest not.)

        It’s a lot easier to suggest I’m an agent of SOMEBODY EEEEVILLLL than to deal with the fact that what I’m saying may actually (and factually) debunk the zeitgeist of the CH commentariat.

        And as for “Disinfo agents typically stick to /pol/.” I have to applaud that lovely sentence: it’s an outstanding example of either ESL or obscure politico-speak. Try English. Or read Orwell’s “Politics and the English Language.”

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:35 pm Moonchild

        There is nothing factual about anything you say shill. Take the following quote of yours as an example.

        “Nicole, there is no historical basis for their anti-Semitism. It’s all conspiracist nonsense, which is the traditional refuge of beta losers.”

        This is a lie so monstrous only the most misinformed sheep would accept it as truth. The entire history of Europe, Russia, and the Middle East consists of host populations dealing with their Jewish Problem. Were all these societies throughout history just raging anti-Semites? Or was there a reason that the Jews were swatted away. I’m sure it wouldn’t have anything to do with their use of subversion and deception to attempt to aggressively denigrate the host culture while crying “persecution” whenever attention was brought to their activities. I’m sure it wouldn’t have anything to do with their shady business practices and financial scams. I’m sure it wouldn’t have anything to do with their use of the media and financial system to collectivize and destroy their hosts while enriching themselves. But you already know all this since your just a shill trying to spread disinfo. Its not gonna work here buddy.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 6:43 pm ho

        ““Philosemite shyster”? You’re not even 50% correct.”

        You are a clear philosemite because you claimed to admire Jews for their ability to “punch above their weight” and because you have many kikish friends. You also are a shyster because…well, read the thread.

        And /pol/ is a political board on 4chan you jackass.

        LikeLike


  80. on April 20, 2014 at 2:49 pm Director

    He’s another assassinated Monarch for one thing. Just like the Czar. A Hugenot who compromised with the Catholics and was killed for giving the little man a break.

    Do you know who shot Czar Alexander? There was a 50% Moishe Quotient. Kings who look out for the “loser” tend to get gunned down by money men.

    He attempted as best he could to look after the welfare of the common Frenchman. Much as the Czar looked out for the “kulak”.

    That’ll get you assassinated.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:15 pm Kim du Toit

      1. Henry IV was assassinated by a fanatical Catholic, not by the nobility. He was loathed by both Protestants and catholics because of his conversion to Catholicism (without which he could never have become king). Yes, he was considerate towards the common man — but his assassination, according to the assassin’s own testimony, was because of religion, not because he supported the common man. (I’ve read the original account, in French, so there’s not much doubt about that.)
      2. Czar Alex II wasn’t assassinated by the “money men”, but by an anarcho-populist movement called “The People’s Desirel” (or something like that, I don’t speak Russian). I don’t know whether Rysakov was Jewish or not — it doesn’t matter, really, unless you believe that he was planted in the movement by the Jewish money men (it would have to be “believe”, because there’s absolutely no evidence to support it).

      @Director: frankly, I don’t even know what you’re arguing about. Consider this thread closed.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 7:01 pm corvinus

        Consider this thread closed.

        Yeah, because you got your ass kicked.

        LikeLike


  81. on April 20, 2014 at 3:04 pm CuriousFem

    Do the men here think Japanese and Korean female pop stars are good examples of femininity and youthfulness for women?

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 3:18 pm culprette

      LOL that’s why these poor bubs have so much trouble presenting a united
      front – half are bigots denigrating Third World Women, and the other half are appropriating them as the antidotes to the “”feminazi’d white Western bitch”” –
      Divide and conquer, a great strategy, proven time and time again and
      OOPS that was my out-loud voice, I gotta be more careful !

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 3:33 pm Kim du Toit

        LOL again culprette. Thank you for bringing a little grownup humor to this nest of prepubescents.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 4:31 pm ho

        Aren’t you the faggot who denies kikes shitting on western civilization?

        Remember that darkies debate contest? Where blacks with below average IQ speedread from a sheet while panting like dogs and they actually win because diversity?

        I read an article that considered that farce a positive. GUess what his name was.

        It was Schatz.

        The problem with these blind faggots is, there is absolutely nothing that will make them believe the obvious truth. If you actually pay attention to who VANGUARDS this kind of shit, it’s almost always a Jew.

        LikeLike


  82. on April 20, 2014 at 3:47 pm Director

    On your way then Kim, en avant!

    LikeLike


  83. on April 20, 2014 at 3:52 pm Director

    on April 20, 2014 at 3:08 pm | Replyculprette
    You’re free to make 1000 babies yourself to make up for any shortfalls, if diversity bugs you so much –
    LOL Hell have you gotten even ONE white woman to have yer kid ?

    Apart from helping to contour Kim’s profile, thank tou for that, very few men are “free” to have 1000 children.

    Ramesses II fathered about 100 known children. He was Pharoah. Mere mortal men wishing to stay out if jail for non payment of child support rarely dare to have more than 3.

    Your hyperbole betrays your cuntish dryness.

    LikeLike


  84. on April 20, 2014 at 3:54 pm Director

    “@Director: frankly, I don’t even know what you’re arguing about. Consider this thread closed.”

    Clearly you are out of step with the gist of CH.

    Why are you even posting here?

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 4:18 pm Kim du Toit

      I could ask you the same question. Certainly, questioning my ancestry, suggesting I know little about guns and getting into tangential arguments over historical minutiae seem to fall more into the realm of character assassination than honest debate. Unless character assassination is the gist of CH…

      Actually, I post here because by and large, I tend to agree with most of what Our Gracious Host says, even though occasionally his conclusions are a liitle hyperbolic. If I disagree with Monsieur l’Heartiste, it’s only with respect to degree, and not in toto.

      Now, when it comes to almost all of the commenters on CH, I make no such claims. Mostly, it’s like arguing with a nine-year-old: they have opinions and feel very passionately about them, but they’re almost always 100% wrong.

      Still, I like to shed a little realism, derived from my social dispassion, extreme age and long experience in the Wars Between The Sexes, on comments and statements which sometimes seem quite deranged (if not actuallyincorrect).

      Consider me one of the Elder Statesmen of Game — “elder” in the sense that most of the Game gurus are about the same age as my own children — from the days when “game” was just called “flirting” (evn though it had precisely the same goal, without all the silly acronyms), and which secured for me a number which is quite respectable, even by today’s debauched standards.

      I know that for many youngins, it’s an anathema to regard anything said by us Old Farts as anything other than irrelevant and stupid. But as a (post-grad) student of history,allow me to suggest that no one said it better than Cicero: “Nescire autem quid ante quam natus sis acciderit, id est semper esse puerum.”

      And to help boys become men is one of my life’s goals.

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 4:20 pm Kim du Toit

      WordPress ate my response, sadly, and I don’t feel like re-creating it. But take my word for it: my response was witty and elegant.

      LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 4:24 pm Moonchild

        Nothing you do is witty nor elegant shill. GTFO.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 4:30 pm Kim du Toit

        @Moonchild: You forgot to insult my mother. That always works well on the playground (with which you are doubtless familiar). Why don’t you GTFO instead?

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 4:55 pm Moonchild

        I don’t need to because I don’t deal in deception like you. Notice how every commenter knows you’re a fraud and a joke? Your lies aren’t going to pass among the informed. Go post on Jezebel they’re more on par with your IQ level there.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:03 pm Kim du Toit

        Yeah, “every commenter knows”… the sure giveaway of the frightened herdling. No doubt you also believe in Global Warming/Cooling/Climate Change, because “every scientist says” means it’s “settled”.

        Who gives a shit what “everybody” thinks? And feel free to give examples of my “deception”. I won’t hold my breath.

        LikeLike


      • on April 20, 2014 at 5:09 pm ho

        “No doubt you also believe in Global Warming/Cooling/Climate Change, because “every scientist says” means it’s “settled”.”

        You literally just made that up you filthy cockroach.

        LikeLike


  85. on April 20, 2014 at 4:56 pm Pijama Wearing Ninja

    http://thoughtcatalog.com/isabel-chalmers/2014/04/dear-nice-guy-i-wasnt-ready-for-you-before-but-i-am-now/
    I’d rather stick my cock in a wood chipper than have anything to do with this woman. The fact that she writes under her own name shows how pathetic beta men became.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 4:58 pm Pijama Wearing Ninja

      http://thoughtcatalog.com/nicole-mullen/2014/04/everything-you-know-about-sex-is-wrong/
      Pretty good satire. I’m sure some feminists think like that.

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 5:13 pm Kim du Toit

      One has to wonder what Ms. Chalmers brings, or thinks she brings to the party whereby a “Nice Guy” would even want to talk to her, let alone date her or get into a relationship with her.

      All I can get from her self-description is “narcissist”, “many-time loser” and “worn out vagina”. And I suspect I’m only scratching the surface.

      Basically, she’s dragging the bottom for dates, hoping that some dweeb will ignore her sexual heritage and her fading looks, and indulge her maternal impulse.

      The sad thing is, she’ll probably get one.

      LikeLike


  86. on April 20, 2014 at 5:34 pm Director

    on April 20, 2014 at 5:09 pmho
    “No doubt you also believe in Global Warming/Cooling/Climate Change, because “every scientist says” means it’s “settled”.”
    You literally just made that up you filthy cockroach.

    Kim Du Toit is an odd fish. He’s claiming without evidence that anyone who contradicts him is a believer in Anthropogenic Global Warming.

    The problems that the Jews and the Czar had are quite well documented. The Jews fucking hate Cossacks and the feeling was mutual. It’s no surprise that the Okhrana might put a dossier together about Jewish subversion in the Russian Empire. The Jews were out to overturn the Imperial System and further enslave the peasants, just as the Communists (heavily overrepresentation of Jews like Trotsky and Kaganovich in the massacres, proceeded to do later on.

    One of the assassins of Alexander II was a ringer for Mila Kunis. Geysa Gelfman.

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesya_Gelfman

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 5:37 pm Moonchild

      Nothing odd about him he’s a straight up shyster who knows exactly what he’s doing. Just ignore and move on.

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 5:54 pm Kim du Toit

      “Kim Du Toit is an odd fish. He’s claiming without evidence that anyone who contradicts him is a believer in Anthropogenic Global Warming. ”

      @ Director: you didn’t learn about debate and rhetoric at any point in your sadly-lacking education, did you? All I was doing [he explained patiently] was pointing out the fallacy of the “everybody knows” / appeal to authorityargument. At no point did I make any link between disagreement with me and the Global Warming misconception. Jesus wept.

      But to continue:

      “The Jews fucking hate Cossacks and the feeling was mutual.” Or perhaps the Jews fucking hated the Cossacks because of the murderous Cossack raids on the undefended shtetls. And perhaps the Cossacks hated the Jews because they believed in bullshit like “The Jews were out to overturn the Imperial System and further enslave the peasants…” Outside bullshit rants like the Protocols, is there even a scintilla of proof to support that assertion? No? Thought not.

      And the Communists were so under the control of the Jews that Lev Bronstein felt it necessary to to change his name to Leon Trotsky, to avoid being tossed out of the Party.

      I can do this all day, it’s SO easy…

      LikeLike


      • on April 22, 2014 at 5:56 am bendy

        no it’s because Bronstein is a GERMAN NAME YOU IDIOT and trostky himself was GERMAN

        many of the revolutionaries were either Russian American, or not Russian at all.

        LikeLike


  87. on April 20, 2014 at 5:35 pm Gro Haila

    >>Much as the Czar looked out for the “kulak”.<<

    … the "kulak" worked as pea in a pod with his jewish merchant pal, in getting the best price for his products … to the tune of one house for each of his FOUR children, top-of-the line electronics, seaside timeshare, and enough money to lose a small flour mill's worth in a monetary reform.

    … right now you do what Monsanto dictates or else.

    LikeLike


  88. on April 20, 2014 at 5:46 pm Director

    Gro Haila,

    CEO Monsanto? It helps if your name is Shapiro.

    Parting shot for the Easter Celebrations. This is the reason the Pogroms and clashes first began in the Russian Empire. The Ottoman Sultan executed the Greek Orthodox Ethnarch and his Jewish henchmen dragged the body through the streets and dumped the body in the harbor.

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriarch_Gregory_V_of_Constantinople

    It makes good reading and provides background to all those tales about vicious Cossacks and horrid Czars.

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 6:12 am Gro Haila

      Director

      Schapiro supports what 100, 1000 jewish families, tops. The arrangement before was more like 4 million kulak families and 1 million zhyd families, in a symbiotic relationship (4 houses, yadda, yadda yadda, great uncle JD at Vienna, etc).

      I understand the bridge in Brooklyn you’re selling me for a great price, but I ain’t buying.

      LikeLike


  89. on April 20, 2014 at 6:36 pm JT

    Let me add a drop of wine to the comments sewer. All this focus on Jews is unbecoming. Like fat nerds at school obsessing over the head girl. We all know their blind spots and proclivities. They are not the First Cause, move on.

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 6:39 pm ho

      “Like fat nerds at school obsessing over the head girl.”

      Pleasureman/Matt Forneyism alert.

      LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 8:57 pm driveallnight

      Agreed, the constant Jew discussion is tedious. Everybody here knows the score by now.

      LikeLike


    • on April 25, 2014 at 7:41 pm Kev

      Agreed, let’s get back to ni66ers!!!!

      The superior, inferiors.

      LikeLike


  90. on April 20, 2014 at 7:05 pm Bardon

    Obsessing about Jews. How imbecilic. Pooh ….

    There are more important things to think about:

    http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/index.html

    https://whitelocust.wordpress.com/the-reality-of-racial-differences/

    https://unsafeharbour.wordpress.com/2012/02/09/who-is-attracted-to-who/

    http://neuropolitics.org/defaultfeb07.asp

    http://racehist.blogspot.com/2009/04/natality-data-rates-of-interbreeding.html

    http://toiletnationusa.com/2013/03/08/lukewarm-race-war-whitey-survival-guide-part-one/

    http://whitelocust.wordpress.com/morality-and-abstract-thinking-how-africans-may-differ-from-westerners/

    Plus, now hardly available data (after Holder’s rearrangements of official sites now mostly broken linx, but reliable data ):

    U.S. Justice Department 2006 rape statistics:
    http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0602.pdf
    Scroll to Table 42. –> 32,443 Whites raped by Blacks, zero Blacks raped by Whites.

    U.S. Justice Department 2005 rape statistics:
    http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0502.pdf
    Scroll to Table 42. –> 37,460 Whites raped by Blacks, zero Blacks raped by Whites.

    U.S. Justice Department 2004 rape statistics:
    http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0402.pdf
    Scroll to Table 42. –> 11,611 Whites raped by Blacks, zero Blacks raped by Whites.

    U.S. Justice Department 2003 rape statistics:
    http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0302.pdf
    Scroll to Table 42. –> 20,309 Whites raped by Blacks, zero Blacks raped by Whites.

    …
    http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/tables/ovracetab.cfm

    So, average white on black homicide rate from 1976. t0 2005. per annum was around 300-400, while black on white was oscillating between 900- 1200.

    And you are having epileptic fits about Juice. Swell …

    LikeLike


    • on April 20, 2014 at 9:15 pm ho

      “Juice” are responsible for the fact that people cannot speak about race differences you imbecile. Stephen Jay Gould, Richard Lewontin, ever heard of these? Both biologists that deny racial differences. Franz Boas was a Jewish anthropologist that did the same.

      “Boas was especially concerned with racial inequality, which his research had indicated is not biological in origin, but rather social. Boas is credited as the first scientist to publish the idea that all people—including white and African-Americans—are equal. He often emphasized his abhorrence of racism, and used his work to show that there was no scientific basis for such a bias.”

      But we’re only wasting our time with the juie, are we?

      LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 11:42 pm Carlos Danger

      I’m looking forward to seeing your usual Takimag dissimulation thoroughly debunked here.

      LikeLike


  91. on April 20, 2014 at 10:26 pm De Nestor

    CH:

    If you drop the nested comments feature, you will almost surely see an improvement in the quality of discussion around here. See Steve Sailer, Mangan comment sections, for example.

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 1:19 am ho

      What’s “quality” for you, isn’t necessarily quality for him/us. If it wasn’t for that shitflinging monkey called Kim du Toit, this comment thread would be decent.

      LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 11:43 am De Nestor

        Let’s try it out. I think you’ll like the change in quality.

        LikeLike


  92. on April 21, 2014 at 2:06 am Vince Lin

    Coke + Rum = Good. Social diversity is good. Old people tend to be inflexible and stubborn.

    LikeLike


  93. on April 21, 2014 at 2:45 am whiskeysplace

    Ho Kim du Toit us a fairly big name in gun circles, been published, is the John Derbyshire of the gun world and IIRC fought in Rhodesia and is the author if th Let Africa Burn post. Short of the resurrection of Col. Cooper he’s the biggest gun name to visit here.

    You are the moron who thinks fat old Goering and that homi Himmler were heroes.

    Ho is exhibit A of the failure of the West. He’s White knighting for women who are the main driver of duversity. Damn nook keyboard!

    Women demand peacock big tail handicaps in White guys … I’m so Alpha I dint care about half of Africa in my nation. Plus anti beta male White guy status mongering. Decline of the West is attributable to these two factors mainly, roit cause is womens enhanced mate and sex market position due to pill, condim, anon urban living. Which hit Jews hardest. Non Orthdox fertility is about 1.01 far beliw replacement. Jews vanishing as they dint have kids.

    Fantasy its all Jews witches Cathars. Expose and kill them the plague, diversity, Moors go away. Real hard stuff is fixing the nuke of birth control giving women all the cards. That’s too hard to fix so run along ho to fantasy land and leave the adults to fix this.

    LikeLike


  94. on April 21, 2014 at 6:27 am Director

    I can do this all day, it’s SO easy…

    In between training 500 women to shoot AR15s and rechambered Desert Eagles and fathering 1000 white children you can afford to comment on here? Who’s paying your salary Quim De Twat? The 6,000,000?

    LikeLike


  95. on April 21, 2014 at 6:41 am Director

    Although Trotsky changed his name from Lev Bronstein, he was a dominant force in the early USSR. Stalin (also not his name) was that bit more ruthless. Lenin wasn’t a real name either. These names are nom de Guerre and are no more or less ethnic than any other name. It’s not like Bronstein is a uniquely Jewish name. Everyone knew his background.

    The man who pulled the strings however, the Gulag Kapo Lazar Kaganovich, managed to outlive the USSR and died in the 1990s. I understand Stalin married his sister. It didn’t stop them from assassinating him too.

    LikeLike


  96. on April 21, 2014 at 6:50 am zek

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/16/gender-facts-traditional-roles_n_5115265.html#slide=start

    LikeLike


  97. on April 21, 2014 at 7:15 am tang3zang

    I once spoke with a British man who went on at lengths about the paranoia of the BNP and EDL, stating how their fears of a Muslim majority in the UK was completely unrealistic, at which point I told him 1% minority was 1% too many.

    He was stunned. Seeing how I spoke fluent English, demanded to know how I could believe this when I must be a minority from some Western country myself, at which point I told him if I could make Canada 100% Chinese, I would.

    The look on his face, man.

    So when did catfish become a verb? To catfish is to…?

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 7:35 pm backchecking

      Bottom feed.

      LikeLike


  98. on April 21, 2014 at 9:56 am Grim

    CH, re: this tweet: “RT @AsaAkira: If I never have kids, all my periods (I’ve had 884 of them,) will have been for nothing. Being a woman is just one huge joke. ”

    LOL, yeah women are very consciously pissed off — perhaps I don’t blame them — about the menses thing and, yeah, if they are childless, they will say this exact same thing.

    Sorry to always be commenting from a place of personal anecdotes here like a woman, but my ex GF was a good source of info because I dated her for 3 years and she’s a bit high T and very cool during the non-crazy times.

    She gave me that exact quote…was totally aware of how many periods she would have in her life for no reason if she ended up childless.

    That’s another thing in general. I have concluded that some of the bitchiness/shit testing crap (all the stuff we discuss here…the annoying aspects of dealing with women) is *conscious* not subconscious. You might disagree. Shit testing is a biological thing to find the best seed for her egg…okay. True. But I’m telling you that many women are *actively* (consciously) pissed off about the physical aspects of being a woman (menses, pain of child birth, shaving legs/mustaches/armpits, makeup wearing) and they consciously take it out on men and the rest of the world.

    But anyway, ya, I’ve heard that quote about menses being all of nothing and experienced women knowing how many they’ve had in real life.

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 11:28 am Amy

      “LOL, yeah women are very consciously pissed off — perhaps I don’t blame them — about the menses thing and, yeah, if they are childless, they will say this exact same thing.”

      Even if a woman has a few kids, she’s still doing to have many months of periods over her childbearing lifetime. It’s not a big deal unless dehabilitating cramps are involved. The women pissed off about this are the ones who drank the feminist koolaid and believe being a woman is generally a far greater physical/social/emotional burden than being a man. Anything a woman has to deal with that a man doesn’t is going to set them off.

      Being bitchy about these physical “burdens” might be conscious behavior, but the shit test part is usually subconscious. She *thinks* she wants you to coddle her, but what she really wants is for you to call her out on her bullshit.

      LikeLike


  99. on April 21, 2014 at 10:03 am Grim

    Once again I can give a real world report from the front lines of the diversity-is-war issue. I live in a big, very “diverse” city. Only NYC, LA and perhaps a few others are bigger or more “diverse.” I live, of course, in a nice apartment building, but it’s very near a bad part of town. I sometimes go to a grocery store that is very “diverse” in its patrons. As y’all know–I know I’m not the only one–these black people have drunk the Kool-Aid of “whitey oppresses you” even though they don’t work and get food stamps, and they HATE white people. They are actively looking for a polar bear opportunity. This is not my racism coming out first, to someone who might comment along those lines. These people are just completely rude, blocking aisles on purpose, playing chicken with cars when you see them on the road, etc. Just daring one to hit them. I see it a lot from the women and their 8 CHILDREN. I was at the grocery store the other day and a 9 year old little black girl actually stuck her arm out on purpose to block my path, while giving me an evil stare. That’s because her mom taught her, of course, that white me are bad. This is literally true.

    Meanwhile 90% of what my child is taught at public school is the history of Martin Luther King. Black history month lasts 6 months at my kids’ school, and this is a 99% white school. It’s white guilt stuff.

    Never mind the fact that I’m a full grown man pushing a shopping cart and I could have ripped her fucking arm off…..no these niggraz have their kids block the aisles, don’t tell them to move, don’t discipline them,….they are just daring you to start something with them.

    They are truly (on average, Thwack), as have been proven, a full standard deviation lower in average IQ, average IQ 80… truly a different species. I’m sorry, but it’s just true. All one has to do is observe and live in this world. Anyone but a retarded (or evil) SWPL knows that a very normal white person is just different…. there is a reason why generation after generation the black neighborhood is what it is, and it’s not slavery that ended in 1865.

    LikeLike


    • on April 25, 2014 at 7:55 pm Kev

      We know, we know. Black people are simply a feral species incapable of civility without having their spirit broken like captured animals.

      It’s interesting that I, as a Black myself, have also experienced what you described in certain environments. In fact, I know exactly where it’s likely to happen and I actively avoid those areas.

      Sooner or later though, my low IQ will rear it’s ugly head and I’ll be unable to resist the urge to lash out at the first White person that makes eye contact with me. I’m trying though, please give some of us a chance.

      LikeLike


  100. on April 21, 2014 at 11:27 am PA

    CH Tweet: Dear Proposition Nation whores, Meb Keflezighi, winner of Boston Marathon, was born in Eritrea. Yours in non-interchangeability

    Yahoo’s news headline: “American wins Boston Marathon for first time since 1983”

    Yes. “American.”

    LikeLike


  101. on April 21, 2014 at 11:55 am Full-Fledged Fiasco

    One in two boys develops breasts.

    LikeLike


  102. on April 21, 2014 at 12:09 pm De Nestor

    CH tweet: “@TheIslander829 The native stock of Americans were colonists, not immigrants.”

    More like explorers, pioneers, settlers (rather than colonists).

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 12:56 pm De Nestor

      Also, conquerors.

      LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 12:58 pm De Nestor

        Actually, native stock Americans weren’t really conquerors. Pioneers, explorers, settlers probably more accurate.

        LikeLike


  103. on April 21, 2014 at 12:21 pm Director

    “Jews certainly assimilated into Europe, Hitlers WWI commander was a Jew and the gas chambers were filled with Jews wearing their Iron Crosses.”

    This is a myth. Jews were if not shirkers, REMF. Supply depot, staff, contractor/officers.

    “But as scapegoats for modernity anti semites found it useful to say murder Anne Frank and nearly all her family.”

    She died of the runs. About a million Dutch died of starvation, dysentery, bombing, infighting. I couldn’t give a fuck about one more dead body. The Hongerwinter was avoidable too, in retrospect it looks like collusion between Ike and Model.

    “Jews are dna wise Italians and ME. You dint get much Whiter.”

    Really? You mean southern Italian. It’s barely one nation. The northern Italians are fair. The Southern Italians swarthy. They will probably secede.

    “But Europeans love love love to slaughter each other and construct idiot conspiracy theories to avoid facing modernity, the Black Death (it was witches!) Etc. Jew hatred = European rivalry. Asians don’t care.”

    The Black Death actually led to higher wages and a modernization of society. In nations that had already booted out Jews we see the first native middle classes emerge. What witches were burned in England for example after the Nlack Death? You are confused. The Black Death gave us Watt Tyler and the near end of serfdom.
    Edward I and St Louis booted out the Jews and Western Civilization has not looked back until the 1940s.

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 9:16 pm backchecking

      “Ghetto” — it comes from NORTHERN Italy — and originally referred to the bad part of town — as in the iron working district. One can only imagine the noise and air quality of that age.

      The Jews of Italy were never strongly associated with southern Italy; certainly not Sicily. They gravitated to the action… which ran from Naples northward.

      The predominant occupation of Jews in the middle ages was trading/ peddling and small crafts manufacture. Most of Europe flatly prohibited Jewish land ownership, farming or otherwise.

      But, then again, most of the land was locked up by the peerage. No commoner could own land, either!

      The harsh — and negative — aura around Jews at that time largely turned on Christian paranoia.

      1) Jewish trading networks normally made local Jews the best informed about the outer world. Consequently, the were getting the best of the local Goys at every turn. (Think of it as the High Frequency Trading of its day.) Most Christians still have zero trading understanding. It’s not taught in school. You can get an MBA and still be clueless. This persistent inferiority creates animosity.

      2) Keeping a Kosher kitchen meant that Jews persistently survived epidemics that plagued all Europeans — because they kept terrible hygiene. Some idea of how severe the problem is can be viewed on “Naked and Afraid.” There you’ll see highly skilled, pretty smart Americans falling prey to intestinal problems because sanitation and sterilization is hell to attain in primitive conditions. (no soap)

      3) In EVERY population, there are going to be some nasty players. In the case of the Jews of the Middle Ages, they suffered by association with some nasty characters, full blown loan sharks.

      This last point demands elaboration:

      The ‘great’ Jewish banking houses of the time were criminal syndicates — if you apply modern legal and moral standards to them. They broke a chest full of felonies on their way to Jewish wealth and riches. They left a legacy of bitter anti-Semitism in their wake.

      Modern Jewry entirely dissociates from this legacy. It’s an oppressed history — a variation on Holocaust denial, if you will.

      Like the Nazis and their death camps, the Jewish lending syndicates did stuff that couldn’t be defended then or now.

      1) Enabling totalitarian war mongering… Jewish ‘banking’ largely consisted of financing warfare. No Jew lent money to a commoner. In fact, you’d have to be pretty high in the peerage to have ANY shot at finance at all.

      Lending for commercial purposes? Tis to laugh. Ship borne trade was financed by assigning shares/ equity. Ships and cargo had zero collateral value. They kept getting lost at sea.

      2) Restarting wars that had ended for lack of finance… Not uncommonly, lending to both sides. (!)

      3) War profiteering… extra special interest rates for war loans…

      4) Loan sharking… epic interest rates that would make the Mafia blush… These were super stiff rates and in size.

      5) Funding virulently anti-Semitic monarchs, permitting them to enslave victims, engage in religious war, and de facto commit genocide… (Imperial Spain taking the pole position in this contest.)

      And in a similar vein, Jews of that era famously would exclude/ bankrupt anyone who tried to compete in business trade. It was a rough crowd in a largely lawless time. Some would call this exclusion clannishness. Others might point out that virtually all of the Jewish economic tactics used would be felonies in modern America – and harshly treated elsewhere.

      Many of the modern gangsters methods are nothing but repetitions of Jewish ‘business tactics’ from that era. We can ‘thank’ gangster Rothstein for that. He didn’t invent them overnight.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Rothstein

      While YKW has minted no end of flims on Capone – Arnold never quite gets his due. His existence is danced around. He’s only obliquely implied in such efforts as “The Organization”

      One could easily make the argument that Jews and Christians were locked in a perpetual economic cold war going on centuries.

      No small part of this was the European conviction that Jews actively enabled the (Muslim) Moors to fight a centuries long campaign against Christianity. The Sephardic Jews of Iberia were accused of playing both sides. (500 years later, who knows where the real truth lies?)

      Advising and financing the loser is a very, very dangerous position to end up in. Their (Sephardic) descendants paid the price over the next centuries. In fact, they were so radioactive that the Sephardim had to flee all of the way to Poland and Yugoslavia. All remaining (Spanish) Jews had to convert to Catholicism on the spot.

      (That didn’t turn out well, either. Instead of faking Catholicism, exodus would’ve been wiser. All in all, it’s astonishing that the Sephardim didn’t sail overseas, Puritan style. Many were filthy rich and well connected. Even the common Spanish yokels saw the play.)

      Astonishingly, the Ashkenazim totally rejected them. That’s why the Sephardim had to stay out of France, Italy and Germany. It’s still a big deal. Marriage across the sects is uncommon – and deemed shocking in many Jewish circles.

      The term “kike” is an Ashkenazi / Yiddish insult against Polish/ Sephardic Jewry. IIRC, it’s pretty much a Jewish-American insult dating from the late 19th Century, NYC. It jumped into a wider usage, PDQ. The term “Polish Jew” is a euphemism (in Jewish circles) for Sephardic Jews.

      LikeLike


  104. on April 21, 2014 at 12:37 pm Grim

    CH, file this under “America is done. It’s over.” Thanks to Cathedral destruction.

    zlozlzozlzlzozlzo

    http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/16/living/prom-dress-shopping-too-sexy-skimpy-parents/?iref=obnetwork

    Fatties with “natural” big boobs (because they need to lose 80 pounds), transvestites suing because they can’t be prom queen, women suing because they can’t fuck on the dance floor at prom, etc.

    LikeLike


  105. on April 21, 2014 at 12:44 pm Director

    Immigrant and Pioneer are different.

    Blacks are obselete farm equipment though.

    LikeLike


  106. on April 21, 2014 at 1:17 pm Jay in DC

    Just came off hiatus back to a full fledged FLAME WAR regarding weapon calibers and who’s barrel is the thickest and longest. Fucking saaaawweeeet!

    Good to be back CH readerati. Glad to see not much has changed… that is the beauty of a comfortable old shoe. You just know it will fit oh so snug again even if you are too busy in your work boots for a while.

    Just got my balls out of the vice of explosive Q1 project hell. The only thing I saw different after skimming posts really was Amy has slowly transformed from an amorphous blob of blonde hair, to a neck, to a partial front view avatar. If I were a betting man, which I am, I’d go “all in” that the pic is lifted from someone far beyond her true capacity. *No* chick that looked like that ever put a pic of her fucking neck online if she was sporting a face like that. Ever. Did I mention ever?

    It’s like having a Ferrari in your garage and sending a photo of the wheel wells to your closest friends.

    Anyways, other than that, business as usual…

    Whiskey still loves YKWs and BBC, thwack still hates ni66ers and BBC (sorry brah we can’t all be tripods), etc.

    Game on!

    I did have the sad and sobering experience of driving through the neighborhood I grew up in and it is little El Salvador now, literally. 50% of the signage is in Spanish and there are diminutive brown beings wandering about everywhere. Just remember, coming soon to a place near you even if you are in “flyover” country. The damn has burst wide and you -will- be awash in the melanin flood.

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 2:26 pm Amy

      Lol, not seeing my face is the whole point. Anonymity… it’s what’s for dinner.

      LikeLike


      • on April 21, 2014 at 7:23 pm Amy

        It’s never gonna happen because I’m not interested. But thanks for the offer.

        LikeLike


      • on April 22, 2014 at 4:38 am thwack

        How bout a tag team Amy?

        You can pick my partner?

        You wanna be made airtight? Broken down like a shot gun…?

        We will make you fluent in your mother tongue.

        LikeLike


      • on April 22, 2014 at 6:24 pm Jay in DC

        I go first. “No BOOM BOOM soul brotha!”

        LikeLike


  107. on April 21, 2014 at 1:46 pm Grim

    lzozlozlzo. Countries with ridiculously high homicide rates. I notice a pattern. zlozlzozozloz

    http://www.vox.com/2014/4/21/5636412/countries-most-homicides-deadliest-murder-rates

    LikeLike


  108. on April 21, 2014 at 2:28 pm al

    I have a few questions ???

    Where do “white” people come from ????

    We know that the original and aboriginal people (homo sapiens) of the planet are “negroes”,
    We know that the first homosapiensapiens inhabitants of “Europe” were negroes (Grimaldi Man)
    Negroes spread to Asia along two routes – southerly: Horn of Africa, Arabia, Asia along the coast and then northerly – through “Middle East” to Asia.

    Where then do “whites” come in ????? Who are these creatures ???
    What happened to the original indigenous aboriginal black Europeans – inhabitants of Europe ???

    We are told an incredible story: that negroes in Europe mixed with some Neanderthals and then became “white” due to the need to process vitamin “D”.during the Ice Ages.

    But this hardly makes any sense:

    1. “Eskimo/Aleuts/Siberians” live in extreme cold and have for millenia and they can often be quite dark – i.e. yellow to tawny brown – what about their need to process vitamin D ??? -(no blonds,no blue eyes etc.)

    2. The common assumption is that Neanderthals are “white”, but where is the evidence for this other than in Nat Geo/ Discovery Channel recreations ???
    like all hominids, due to origin in Africa, they must have been “black”.
    And assuming they were “white”, the evidence of admixture is so low (1-4%) and “white” being a recessive trait – this would not have been enough change the the original black population into white.

    3. Recent DNA/genetic analysis suggests that “white” skin came about 5000 to 7000 years ago (approx) – heck lets make it 10,000 years. The problem with this is that natural selection does not occur so rapidly – it is typicalyl measured in 100 of thousands of years and millions.

    So Where then do white people come from and how ???

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 4:57 pm Jay in DC

      Not going to talk about each point as they are all saying the same thing, I will simply address one thing that will answer all your questions at once–

      Recent DNA/genetic analysis suggests that “white” skin came about 5000 to 7000 years ago (approx) – heck lets make it 10,000 years. The problem with this is that natural selection does not occur so rapidly – it is typicalyl measured in 100 of thousands of years and millions.

      Fascinating analysis and it brings up another thing we’ve recently discovered this is going to make you put a gun in your mouth darkie, so I’d sit down first as it can be really messy if you are standing.

      The prevailing theory is that Neanderthal was extant from modern Russia to France wait for it…. wait for it… 300,000 years before the “Out of Africa” theory.

      Oh, make no mistake, they too came from Africa but they had a 300K headstart and went north then. When the precursor to modern man came out and headed north again, wait for it wrap your simian mind around it 200 CENTURIES later. Well… yeah.

      They had 200,000 years to adapt to cold and harsh climate plenty of time for genetic drift to do it’s part in a totally different world.

      Now, this is the cherry on that cake I just iced. RE: light skin, blue eyes, blonde hair. It has been shown that this common marker came about in 1000s of years not tens or 100s of thousands. How can science explain this? It cannot except for one theory that is the accepted one, like motherfucking gravity until someone proves Newton different.

      No natural selection theory can explain the predominant rise of pale skin and blue eyes other than preferential selection for these traits above all others which caused this mutation to propagate far faster than could have occurred naturally.

      Let me translate— The first blonde haired blue eyed white woman was born as a hybrid and everyone after about 50,000 BC wanted to fuck her. Sort of like today then, innit? Nothing new under the sun…

      LikeLike


      • on April 22, 2014 at 4:41 am thwack

        The first blonde haired blue eyed white woman was born as a hybrid and everyone after about 50,000 BC wanted to fuck her.
        ——————————————————————————————–

        So the 1st white woman had a black father?

        LikeLike


    • on April 22, 2014 at 2:15 am backchecking

      1) Science is still early in on this quest. The 1-4% figure is strictly preliminary, as the experts admit that they were only able to get about half-way, maybe 60% of the Neanderthal DNA into their results.

      2) Later results are coming, but have not been published.

      3) The last time anyone looked it took XY and XX to make a baby. Yet every modern human shows ZERO mDNA traceable to Neanderthals. (BTW, the specimens were females)

      While there are multiple possibilities, the obvious one is that Neanderthal XY nailed some Hss XX and killed off her XY kin.

      Strangely, this is exactly the tale of the Sabine women, from classic Roman antiquity. (The legend may be vastly older than they thought.)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rape_of_the_Sabine_Women

      Of coures, such a mating would mean that Neanderthal DNA constituted 50% of modern non-African DNA.

      So why the difference?

      The 1-4% figure is strictly based upon what could be UNIQUELY established as being SOLEY from the XY (?) Neanderthal source. If the rest of the Neanderthal male’s DNA is identical to Hss it would not show up as a shift.

      Considering how much DNA we share with chimps, it’s hardly remarkable that Neanderthals would have DNA that almost entirely lines up with Hss DNA.

      Some evidence indicates that red hair comes from the Neanderthal branch.

      As for blue eyes, they pop up even in South Asian and Oriental populations. One Han child has made the Chinese news. He can virtually see in the dark with his blue eyes.

      It’s a benefit long known in northern latitudes. And, hence, it’s highly prized in a prospective husband — or wife. It equals survival during long northern nights.

      As for White pigmentation: a Nigerian couple famously gave birth to a White baby — in London. This was not a mulatto tyke. She looked like a Swede blonde: totally blonde hair, blue eyes, almost albino skin, etc. She did have all of the other family traits of a Nigerian.

      http://globalgrind.com/2010/07/20/nigerian-couple-gives-birth-to-white-baby-photos/

      Her mother has been totally monogamous.

      No-one has pinned down when Whites became so pale.

      It’s still baffling as to why no mDNA from Neanderthals made it through to the present.

      Additional DNA is being discovered — out of Africa — that does not time synch with Hss as the sole source of humanity.

      The Greek god-myths do go well with the DNA legacy — if Zeus was a powerful Neanderthal incestuously screwing his extended family.

      Incest in modern humans is going to kick out birth defects very quickly.

      But a Neanderthal line crossing the Hss line would NOT have the same dynamic.

      “Zeus” could screw his daughters with impunity. The DNA shift would still be vaster than you nailing your 7th cousin.

      If something like this happened — an extremely likely event, considering, — then the DNA quantum that is in non-African modern humans may be much larger than anyone dares guess.

      The Greek myths started out of something. They may just be tens of thousands of years older than anyone dares imagine.

      It’s like Genesis. That oral tradition dates back to the neolithic, very obviously. It could be 6 to 14 thousand years old. It’s loaded with pagan concepts such as astrology.

      Nordic creation myths also date to the Ice Age, for their gods are ice gods.

      As for races — based on DNA — there are multiple Black races. Genetic drift has been going on in Africa for tens of thousands of years — to the point that the San and the Pygmy don’t care to marry Congolese Blacks. That break appears to be older than 25,000 years… and no mountain ranges or oceans are involved.

      LikeLike


      • on April 22, 2014 at 4:08 pm thwack

        As for races — based on DNA — there are multiple Black races.
        ——————————————————————————————-

        Should they all be hung?

        If not, why do you make the distinction?

        LikeLike


      • on April 22, 2014 at 4:48 pm backchecking

        The DNA trail indicates that instead of the world splitting between Blacks and everyone else there are four, maybe five, Black races — all of them only spotted best by DNA — so the race branching is MUCH wider than skin color would make it appear.

        Race is MORE than skin color.

        It is a weakness of non-Africans to impute a uni-racial stereotype across Africa — because to Whites and Orientals — All Africans seem more alike than not.

        The DNA says this assumption is quite false.

        So too do the tales from the low population races in Africa: Pygmies, San, et. al. (Pygmies describe persistent cannibalism and enslavement. The San stay far, far away from the Zulu….)

        Ultimately, the entire concept of race is going to have to be adjusted to acknowledge the global DNA legacy.

        Apparently, humanity is a sea of racist bigots, and always has been.

        The implication is that good fences make for good neighbors.

        Diversity is a disaster. No-one can stand it, certainly not American Blacks.

        (Check out the Liberian social scene going back a century or so.)

        LikeLike


      • on April 23, 2014 at 4:55 am thwack

        buttchecking

        It is a weakness of non-Africans to impute a uni-racial stereotype across Africa — because to Whites and Orientals — All Africans seem more alike than not.
        ———————————————————————————————-

        This is a false statement. You are attempting to project white color consciousness onto Asians. It is the white mans lack of melanin that leaves him color struck and thus feeling genetically inadequate. This is the reason he acts in a hostile aggressive manner against against all “people of color”; including Asians which he considers “colored”.

        Not only do Asians have dark hair and eyes, but the Asian is a clear derivative of the African. Chinky eyes, cheekbones, flat face… are all African features.

        Ultimately I predict the white racist mans reliance on DNA “proof” will one day bite him in the ass.

        The white man is color struck. He has a bad case of color envy. Just like women who hate men because they have an extra appendage, the white man attacks color because he wishes he had some.

        The White man is not hueman.

        LikeLike


  109. on April 21, 2014 at 5:20 pm al

    “Now, this is the cherry on that cake I just iced. RE: light skin, blue eyes, blonde hair. It has been shown that this common marker came about in 1000s of years not tens or 100s of thousands. How can science explain this? It cannot except for one theory that is the accepted on”e, like motherfucking gravity until someone proves Newton different.

    See ?? you just said it yourself – that science can;t explain it ???

    if the first blond haired blued woman was born as a hybrid and everyone wanted to fuck her and those traits are recessive, then she and her ilk would have been exstinguished pretty close to creation due to the recessive nature of those traits….. no ???

    Where in the hell do white people come from ??

    LikeLike


    • on April 21, 2014 at 6:48 pm Diversity is Good

      It’s all Yakub’s fault, on the island of Patmos. You can look it up…

      LikeLike


  110. on April 21, 2014 at 8:25 pm Jim

    I’ll weigh in.. Kim has a point on caliber.. Hogs that I have to use my tractor bucket to lift even with one of my sons there. Pissed the wife off when I dropped 500 on a shoulder mount. Its still overlooking the pool table though.. I head shot it with a .243. The 243 win isn’t a slouch but I wanted him dead or missed. Buck last year no CNS hit needed. .308 win 150 grain soft point. Once its 5 seconds of adrenaline wore off. Down. But even after making a perfect shot that isn’t a CNS sever. You can still get hurt.

    I hunt with a single shot.. I prefer the ergonomics.. 22″ barrel in a compact size. The only time I needed more than one was with a wild boar that would trust me give you nightmares. He’s on my wall. I’m a sick fuck When I brought it home, I saw my wife was in our game room. I knocked on the door and when she pulled the curtains back she was staring at it. Yes I’m a monster Her reaction was funny as hell though..Surprisingly I don’t feel regret.

    LikeLike


  111. on April 22, 2014 at 8:30 am Ryan Vann

    I realize the golden ratio is a poon commandment, but it should be a comment section commandment too.

    LikeLike


    • on April 22, 2014 at 11:31 am CH

      tell me about it.

      LikeLike


  112. on April 24, 2014 at 6:10 pm Director

    adam was the first blond blue eyed fellow. The time line fits. Writing, legend, civilization, abstraction etc etc.

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

  • Recent Comments

    cortesar on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Carlos Danger on The Confound Of Silence
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain John Charity… on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Dread Forman on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Dread Forman on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
    Captain Obvious on Mocking The Globohomo Cor…
  • Top Posts

    • Ugly, Misshapen, Tatted, Fat Catladies Hate Trump
    • Slutty Women Are Unhappier Than Caddish Men
    • The Great Men On Holding Marital Frame
    • ¡SCIENCE!: The NPC Leftoid Hivemind Is Real
    • Manifest Depravity
    • The Diminishing Returns Of Anti-White Virtue Signaling
    • Beta O'Rourke
    • Mocking The Globohomo Corporatocracy
    • The Confound Of Silence
    • Revolutionary Spirals To Civil War 2
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: