Pleasuresadist takes the prize (an effigy of Tim Wise, complete with zip code map of white neighborhoods) for this pithy decryption of leftoid (aka shitlib) love of “””tolerance”””.
The tolerance that liberals and libertarians demand is really a form of anesthesia–dulling the social nerves to threats. They want you to go through life numb and indifferent.
Diversity + proximity = dehumanization.

“Diversity” means getting beaten to death with your own tire iron when you have a flat tire in the wrong neighborhood.
Real, good diversity is of course plentiful in the West without the need to import peoples who never invented the wheel. We have the diversity that discovered and invented, say, magnetism, airplanes, baroque art, classical music, the piano, penicilline, soccer, golf, wrestling, the weekdays, the months of the year, the watch, music notes…. The things you can read about in “Today in White History”, whose owner I know reads CH. Bookmark it and enjoy your daily dose of Western history, inventions and culture – you know, the diversity most of the world is dying to get their hands on.
We also have the widest variety of appearances. Brown hair, red hair, blond hair, blue eyes, green eyes, brown eyes, different phenotypes…. Diversity. Threatened by globalism and the eradication of borders. Globalism is anti-diversity.
LikeLike
Hi CH/all,
Newbie at the helm. Stumbled on here a while back and have enjoyed the many insightful game-related posts but this is the first of my own. It’s off the tolerance/diversity topic, but I got the sense the crowd here is OK with (and maybe takes pleasure in) advising the less skilled in the comments section.
So: I’m a notch above AFC, generally shy/introverted, number of partners lifetime in the low double-digits, most of my time, including now, spent in LTR’s. Mostly looking at picking up some game – pun intended – out of boredom with monogamy and to improve my social skills and self-image. I live with someone and have no intention of leaving her, so I’ll be doing either cheating game – there must be a more poetic form of expression but it escapes me – or flirting and running away coward game. YAWN… OK, decided to talk to a ridiculously hot girl last night at a cafe/bar expecting a 5-second conversation. I instead got offered a number after 5 minutes.(purportedly to be able to get some info from her about a party she’s putting together) and she opened up a lot about her family background and artistic endeavours/career. I kept at it, making eye contact, smiling, and trying to act much less interested than I was. She ignored her (girl) friend that was sitting next to her for pretty much the entire time, but at some point it seemed natural to go back to our respective friends for a bit. We bumped into each other half an our later and there was some touching/hugging since it looked like the scene was breaking up. A little while later, I really was getting ready to go home (super tired) and she was getting cash from an ATM. She said she was gonna take a cab, I said we could maybe share, she said where she lived, and I … said I lived in the opposite direction, and was obviously having an internal fight regarding what I wanted to do in regard to her and how pushy I should be. I ending up just saying I was gonna get in touch with her, and she said it would be great if I came to her party and that I should bring all my friends. This was the first discouraging sign, and also the last thing said. Of course, I kicked myself for being such a coward and not pushing to see how far I could take it. Since I’m in a relationship I don’t want to jeopardize, I feel I should only be open to one-nighters or a similarly casual arrangement. Still, I now find myself scheming for what to do with this number I have. HELP!!! 😛
LikeLike
> “I live with someone and have no intention of leaving her”
Then shut the fuck up and start putting some buns in her damned oven.
Sheesh.
LikeLike
I will take the second part of your reply into consideration.
Any thoughts from anyone else on the specifics of the pickup situation and next steps?
LikeLike
> ” I … said I lived in the opposite direction, and was obviously having an internal fight regarding what I wanted to do in regard to her and how pushy I should be.”
Hesitation. Self-Doubt. Beta. Friend Zone.
Vagina goes cold and dry.
The night wind blows over the graveyard.
LikeLike
Love Joyce. Zam Zam: boring.
LikeLike
Arbiter
“Diversity” means exploiting nonwhite people.
Real, good diversity is of course having nonwhite people function as your slaves.
Thats why there can never be enough diversity.
LikeLike
thwack, you are such an assclown.
LikeLike
Non-Whites, particularly non-Whites who hate pale faces, literally cannot escape the White man, and, I think, in-part or in-whole, this is the source of much of their angst. Think about it: They can’t even damn the White man without using his language to do so.
thwack is an excellent sample of this genre of hysteria.
LikeLike
They can’t even damn the White man without using his language to do so.
———————————————————————————————-
Actually, Though I do take great satisfaction in:
hanging people with their own petard,
shooting them with their own gun,
stabbing them with their own rusty fork…
I really just do it to see that look on their faces.
LikeLike
The Frankfurt School pushing the “Black Be Bootrifull” angle yet again:
Beyoncé and Lupita Nyong’o are on the Covers of TIME and People and It Is a Big Deal
http://time.com/76225/beyonce-and-lupita-nyongo-are-on-the-covers-of-time-and-people-and-it-is-a-big-deal/
The Frankfurt School never sleeps.
Always on the offensive.
Will not rest until Western Civilization is completely destroyed, annihilated, and eradicated.
LikeLike
There isn’t going to be a better tomorrow and nobody cares what happened yesterday so you might as well live for today.
LikeLike
Aka being afraid of getting involved, so presenting inactivity as being clever instead of laziness/cowardice.
LikeLike
My comment doesn’t advocate any such thing and your inference that it does is very telling sonny.
LikeLike
It’s actually called being “realistic.” Short of some catastrophic event, things aren’t going to change to favor patriarchy, let alone White male interests.
I have yet to see a single movement in favor of anything outside of feminism and corporate profits. Not a single one worth one iota of mention. The demographics of the U.S. are changing rapidly because the people who can actually affect change want it this way.
We are outnumbered and outgunned. Live for yourself and you’ll be much happier.
LikeLike
guys like Underbiter need to believe in something bigger than themselves to inform their worldview. their particular brand of tribalism (while totally understandable) sadly reeks of the insecurities involved with not understanding how to walk their path “monos”. its too much for em. usually extroverts too btw.
easy to knock down a peg with merely a grin.
LikeLike
> “Short of some catastrophic event, things aren’t going to change to favor patriarchy, let alone White male interests.”
Uhh, as catastrophic events go, how about the suicidal fertility rates on the part of the Libtards?
Dude named Philip Longman made his name on this prediction:
The Return of Patriarchy
http://newamerica.net/node/8092
LikeLike
> “I have yet to see a single movement in favor of anything outside of feminism and corporate profits.”
What do you call millions upon millions of families homeschooling their children?
Shelves of ammunition lying bare at Walmart, week after week after week, because everyone is stockpiling?
Duck Dynasty as the most popular show on television?
5000 patriots showing up to defend Clive Bundy?
Ever heard of the Amish? They turned their back on the modern world, and now they’re multiply like rabbits.
Just because the Frankfurt School refuses to publicize the existence of these people does not mean that these people don’t exist.
LikeLike
they’re multiplyING like rabbits
LikeLike
Ever heard of the Amish? They turned their back on the modern world, and now they’re multiply like rabbits.
————————————————————————————————
yeah, WHITE rabbits,
with 6 fingers on each hand, 20 50 vision, flat feet, weak ankles… all the mutanoid caucazoid genetic recessive problems stemming from too much time spent in the shallow end of the gene pool.
LikeLike
@Zombie,
“Shelves of ammunition lying bare at Walmart, week after week after week, because everyone is stockpiling?”
Yeah – that one’s pretty hard not to notice..
LikeLike
“with 6 fingers on each hand,”
That isn’t even a recessive trait you dumb ape. Inbreeding is unlikely to make it more prevalent.
LikeLike
I’m beginning to suspect that “thwack” is jew pretending to be a nigger.
“Scray” on the other hand – at least when he isn’t talking about mudsharking our women – seems like a much more normal guy.
But the relentlessness and single-mindedness with which “thwack” sticks to the same mode of attack doesn’t feel african to me so much as it feels eastern mediterranean, which is to say, levantine.
LikeLike
This is a “chicken little the sky is falling” statement. Mankind has been through great numbers of ups and downs and morphings of cultural customs throughout history. The big pictures is that we collectively continue, over the long haul, to extend the average life expectancy and to have less and less violence (despite what gloom-and-doom newscasters might seem to convey – read Steven Pinker’s book on this subject). We eventually sort things out. This is a weird and anomalous “moment” in history that we are going through right now regarding gender roles. But, to extrapolate from this that we all are going to hell in a handbasket for keeps is an very adventurous supposition. Mankind has a long history of eventually sorting things out. This present back-assward set of notions about females’ proper social roles will eventually be straightened out, I strongly suppose. IMHO, the sky is not falling.
LikeLike
> ” read Steven Pinker”
Thank you Mr Axelrod.
Say hi to Cass for us.
LikeLike
What you say maybe true for mankind, however in the Anglosphere this generations life expectancy is the first to be lower than its parents since the Second World War due to obesity and the sedentary modern lifestyle. My comment is advocating adopting the CH Poolside philosophy while the west collapses, but way more than could ever be conveyed in a short sentence is being read into it.
LikeLike
True. Speaking of living for today, don’t get caught riding through the ghetto on a bike. Some dude caught a bunch of “urban youths’ on camera jumping him while cycling through a bad neighborhood. 90% of the comments are “racist”.
You can only shove diversity down their throats so long. The Internet Commentors are the canary in the coal mine:
LikeLike
oralCummings
Hendrix wasn’t a bad guy;when asked once by a white supplicant,”What does it feel like to be the best guitarist alive?”, he replied,”I don’t know. ask Rory Gallagher.”
——————————————————————————————
He said something similar about Terry Kath who he considered very underrated and deserving of his own band. Regarding Jeff Beck, and even Jimmy Page, it is my opinion that you can’t be a guitar lord if you don’t also sing.
Sorry, thats how it works.
As great as they both are, they can never be knighted guitar lords.
Terry Kath never got the credit for singing he should have because people thought he was just the guitar player for Chicago.
LikeLike
tspark156
There isn’t going to be a better tomorrow and nobody cares what happened yesterday so you might as well live for today.
——————————————————————————————-
LikeLike
John Fahey, hungover, was a better guitar player than Jimi Down-Lo Hendrix.
LikeLike
While my comment is stuck in moderation, here’s a video of John Fahey playing guitar.
And another:
Fahey was a poor boy, a long way from home. He died drunk and alone. You see, he didn’t know the power of LANGUAGE which emboldens the negroes.
LikeLike
Hendrix wasn’t a bad guy;when asked once by a white supplicant,”What does it feel like to be the best guitarist alive?”, he replied,”I don’t know. ask Rory Gallagher.”
LikeLike
Jimi Hendrix was high variance. If you take his best cuts, they’re pretty much better than anyone else’s best at that time — except MAYBE Jeff Beck. But….there is something to be said for being consistent…like Clapton.
And you’re going to trot out a fingerstyle guitarist against a loud ‘to 11’ rock guitarist? C’mon. Different techniques. I bet John Haney would sound like shit with a stratocaster through a marshall plexi with max gain and volume.
Let’s just all agree that rock guitar, in the sense of having a blues base, reached the pinnacle with Eddie Van Halen and then disappeared with the arrival of people like Yngwie Malmsteen, et al.
LikeLike
,”I don’t know. ask Rory Gallagher.”
—————————————————————————————-
I don’t know enough about Rory Gallagher to comment, but regarding Terry Kath I suspect Hendrix admired not only his talent and creativity, but also the fact Terry achieved what Hendrix always wanted but never could get:
To front a large band with horns, percussion… and produce complex songs containing “movements” , refrains, sub movements, recursive patterns…
And still be able to just jam when he wanted to.
Terry Kath was able to do it. Hendrix never was.
In some Hendrix songs you can hear him trying to do it; Cross Town Traffic is a good example where he does the horn part with his voice.
Its important to remember how the culture was different when Kath and Hendrix were growing up; leading your own “big band” was a big fucking deal.
Once you became a “Count” or a “Duke”, you became part of a nobility.
LikeLike
Fucking relativists.
LikeLike
👍
LikeLike
Libertarians don’t believe in diversity necessarily. People left to themselves sans state preprogramming will diversify or not; libertarians generally don’t want to run other people’s lives. It’s the liberals that want diversity organized and institutionalized.
LikeLike
That depends entirely on which libertarian website you read.
There are many on the Right who use libertarianism as a fall-back position, of course. They don’t dare speak out against Affirmative Discrimination by arguing that it is bad for Whites, so they talk about “freedom for all”. Reasoning that if you take away government power, it will be better for Whites than government power being used against Whites, though not as good as government power being used to set things right. But by running scared from truths about race, they leave the door open for anti-Whites to join libertarian organizations. Which they do. And then they start talking loudly against “racism”. And once they are in positions of power they will “expose racists” and have them expelled from the movement, showing none of the tolerance that they themselves were shown. And this is how you get a corrupted movement. It has happened to many, many political parties in the West.
When you dare not speak about race, simply saying that “We are not racists and we don’t want to talk about it”, you confirm that the Left’s paradigm is right, that “racism” is a great evil and that people can be without “racism”. When you confirm that paradigm, people will naturally support the Left, because the Left is the side that “promises to do something about racism”. Rather than the libertarian, who says racism is indeed terrible, but he is not going to do something about it. Heads-up: the majority of people want government to do something about bad cultural values in society, and that is never going to change. So you should discuss what those bad cultural values are. You should oppose the Left on that issue, expose their “anti-racism” and anti-culture and promise to work against it, show the facts and arguments for why the anti-culture should be opposed, instead of just saying that “my ideology has no opinion on the matter” and hoping that it will work. It won’t. Choosing not to fight, not to give people the answers to the opponent’s claims, never works.
LikeLike
we can speak about race til we’re blue in the face, but if we continue to incentivize the world’s worst to come here and leech, that’s what we’ll get. if we incentivize hard work and independence, we can get that too. if removing the safety net and making people’s freedom and responsibility for themselves increases diversity (i doubt it would, but early america suggests it could), then fine. but libertarianism isn’t celebrating diversity for diversity’s sake.
on an individual level i don’t care about race. clarence thomas is about as smart a guy in public office as there is for me. any one particular guy, they can be anything. populations, of course, trend. so i choose to live where i live (not harlem), but meeting a reasonably clean and friendly person of any race, i have no reason to think there’s a problem.
LikeLike
Tolerance to the point of harming self interest is a mental illness
Never forget
LikeLike
Liberals force us to tolerate the intolerance of Muslims
a mental disease , that is what liberalism is indeed
LikeLike
It makes sense because their amygdalas do not function properly and read threats the way they are supposed to.
LikeLike
man thats really it in a nutshell
LikeLike
Hollywood-Academia-Washington-style tolerance is nothing more than creating Eloi for the Morlocks to terrorize.
The modern leftist true believer is nothing more than a near-perfect Eloi, with one hatred left: anyone who isn’t a true believer.
Similar to how PA is with anyone who criticizes his dear cockmaster Piggy.
Literary rape!
LikeLike
Dont get the continual PA and Piggy reference.
LikeLike
In surprised to some extent that no one has spun off the Eloi Morlock story into a series.
What’s not to like? Blondes getting pummeled by Yetis?
LikeLike
It doesn’t play as fiction when it’s fact.
The Yetis just live in the ‘hood.
Otherwise, H G Wells was too close.
LikeLike
The human race is fucked and has always been fucked. Hence our perpetual swim upstream, just like salmon leaping over damns, hoping we make it. We make it over one damn, get a boosted ego, and then maybe, if we’re lucky, a second, though ultimately it’s a futile fight. So we delude ourselves into swimming for something, just to keep the swim going for the sake of swimming.
LikeLike
zhydz/wymin do nihilism very poorly
LikeLike
Jesus H. Christ! Liberals and libertarians arent diametrically opoosed to one another. Libertarians believe in individual liberty and limited government. Liberals believe in the intrusive nanny state bullshit that’s ram-rodded down our throats every day right now. DON’T lump them together.
LikeLike
there was the ‘liberaltarian’ garbage during the last elections, which are liberals who realize they’re basically authoritarians and wanted to be seen as something else, and all the dumbass university types that voted for obama (megan mcardle). but otherwise, yes.
LikeLike
Are diametrically opoosed
LikeLike
No they aren’t.
Scratch a libtarderal, get a fascist.
Scratch a libertardian, get a marxist.
Two sides of the same coin of nihilism.
What you need to learn to recognize in people is their nihilism.
The Darkness.
How It manifests Itself in each specific case is of little importance.
What is important is that It is there to begin with.
LikeLike
You’re right. We’re in the age of uber-cool pessimism/cynicism, and it’s being driven by media influences. Nowadays nothing’s cool until it’s terrifying and dark, and bright themed entertainment is considered whimsical. Yet the vast majority of people who aren’t so dirt-poor that they don’t have internet live in 1st world splendour. Life has never been so good yet people want to mutilate themselves with tattoos and fill their brains with drugs to feel tough. People are flirting with the dark side, and their hearts are turning that way. Surprisingly, those who went through real dark times, such as wars, displayed the most optimism and communal togetherness. I went to a shen yun performance recently and couldn’t get over how optimistic the dancers were. It’s quite difficult to go against the anaethetised tide and be a representative of something good in this world.
LikeLike
> “It’s quite difficult to go against the anaethetised tide and be a representative of something good in this world.”
There will be much wailing and gnashing of the teeth.
Narrow is the way…
LikeLike
“Scratch a libertardian, get a marxist.”
They are literally complete opposites.
If libertarianism is so Jewish (I mean useful to the elites) how come we don’t see Goldman Sachs et al donate to them?
LikeLike
They “donate” money when it’s in their best interests to donate money.
For instance, in Colorado, when they can push through a measure that:
1) Turns their Shkotzim nemeses into THC-addled retards, and
2) Allows them to profit wildly on the distribution and sale of THC products,
then they’ll donate in droves.
About three seconds of googling produced this:
Out-of-state money funded push to pass Amendment 64 and legalize marijuana in Colorado
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/out-of-state-money-funded-push-to-pass-amendment-64-and-legalize-marijuana-in-Colorado
CONT.
LikeLike
CONT.
#1) $1,200,000; Marijuana Policy Project; George Soros; JEW
#2) $875,493; Peter Lewis; JEW
#3) Statistically Insignificant
And don’t think for a second that they view these as “donations” of any sort.
Do not kid yourself.
To these Pharisees, this money is SEED CAPITAL.
LikeLike
“Turns their Shkotzim nemeses into THC-addled retards, and”
Lemme guess, you also think that banning guns is going to make them disappear. Newsflash: they won’t (I know you’re pro gun) Much like that, legalizing pot, won’t make people more likely to smoke them. The Netherlands aren’t anymore retarded than countries where pot use is banned.
It’s also stupid to ban pot in the first place. By what justification? Alcohol is far more harmful yet still legal.
Also, smoking weed doesn’t lead to retardation, no matter how much propaganda you watch.
As for the Jew donor: apex fallacy. Just because the biggest donor was a Jew, doesn’t mean are mostly into libertarianism.
Furthermore, pot was legal for centuries, until statist scum created a problem out of whole cloth based on a substance which is less harmful than both tobacco and alcohol. The “cultural standards” makes absolutely no sense, partly because the good, old, white, Jew free, pre New Deal, pre FED America didn’t mind pot at all. Nor did they care about prostitution if I’m not mistaken. It was fabricated by the same elites that made up “gay marriage”.
We all know that Republicans and Democrats are like Coke and Pepsi. Anyone who is a diametrically opposed to these Jew slaves cannot possibly be the ideal servant, or else, they’d simply turn it into a 3 party system.
LikeLike
Pleasuresadist is a weird guy. Smart and insightful, but actually believes in the Tucker Carlson style “everything that women do poorly is because of ADOLESCENT manboys” attitude, believes that libertarianism is bad because big corporations (big corporations like excessive regularions cuz only they can handle them) and thinks false rape accusations aren’t a big deal because those who don’t want to get laid like tile won’t have to deal with them.
He also brags about watching Mad Men because it is “mature” drama. Weird.
LikeLike
In other words he’s a CONservative.
LikeLike
They both favor faggot “marriage” and share leftoid attitudes about national self-preservation.
LikeLike
Nope.
Both Ayn Rand and Karl Marx are cut from the same nation wrecking genetic cloth.
All political philosophies you are allowed to vote on are pre approved by the Temple.
LikeLike
Conservatards and libertoons are prone to knee-jerkingly scream “socialism” and “collectivism” when the collective interests of whites is mentioned. Problem is, the so-called color-blind socialism of white libtards and their non-white goons always wins against the color-blind hyper-individualism of white ‘tards and libertoons. Two people working together will usually kick the butts of any two individuals who refuse to work together.
LikeLike
http://www.tmz.com/videos/0_wkuhmkt8/
So this is quickly becoming the new evidence of racism. But what I see more than racism is some pathetic ass betaherb. People, without listening to the full audio, are going off today about Clippers owner Donald Sterling telling his gf (who’s half black, half latina) not to bring black people to his games or take pictures with black people and post them all over “the instagram”.
But he also told her that he doesn’t care if she hangs out with Magic Johnson. And that he doesn’t care if she bangs Magic Johnson (uh, dude, Magic’s HIV positive). Just that he doesn’t want her publicly hanging out with all these brothers because otherwise he’ll get calls about it (maybe you buddies are calling you out because they know you’re OK with your gf banging other dudes).
Cuckold: Thy name is Donald Sterling. And you’re being castigated for being a racist on top of that. The LULZ are epic.
LikeLike
Yeah, he definitely failed the jumbotron test.
Donald Tokowitz “Sterling” (great nom de goy by the way).
This shed some insight into older man “wealth game” as well. He’s insisting he doesn’t care if she sleeps with other guys, even black guys. Hey, a girl 40 years younger than you has needs, he is stipulating that he can’t satisfy her. So he’ll pay for a once a month fuck in exchange for flights to Europe. Wealth does not game make. If you want aging to work in your favor, you must do it by acquiring experience and social knowledge, not shekels at all costs.
The girl by the way looks like she could be a mix of every race on the planet, don’t know why he kept insisting to her that she’s white. Just own it dude.
(Also one of the most enraging shit tests is the “I’m sorry you feel that way” thing she kept pulling out. Very cunty. She calls you emotional, attacks your point of view and couches it all in a faux apology. This is why girls get hit.)
LikeLike
“And I’m sorry you are that way.”
LikeLike
I posted this story below but didn’t see that you put it up first. Feel very sorry for the old guy. He even said “dont’ fuck them, just don’t bring them to the games.”
He paid too much for access to that vagina. Way too much.
I can’t call him a betaherb unless he inherited all his money. He’s an alpha in business, just needs some technique. He should read here.
LikeLike
typo, he said “I don’t mind if you fuck them, just don’t bring them to my games.” And she wouldn’t even do that? Go black on that bitch. Into the outer darkness with her.
LikeLike
Uuuuugh, I can’t bring myself to click that link but from reading these comments, it sounds like that woman is a show piece with some far too comfortable ideas about her job position.
The old guy has bought into her frame for some reason and needs to stop bargaining about precisely how he will be cucked and start running billionaire dread game to turn things around. Or just swap in this year’s racially ambiguous model for your next secretary/bed warmer. Seems easy enough if he can snap out of it.
LikeLike
Maybe the right frame for a guy like that is the business deal.
She’s pissing all over the deal you two made, old guy, and while you’ve been mellow about it, now you need to do something. You’ve done this like a thousand times before, right?
LikeLike
Tolerance = either an alibi for Cowardice or a sign of a lack of Convictions
LikeLike
Diversity™ and Multicult® are focus group tested marketing brands for making “Divide and Conquer” (divide et impera) more palatable for the masses.
LikeLike
I somewhat suspected, but the past few months have pretty much solidified things in my mind. I’ve figured out how Facebook can be used to ascertain your hottest leads. (A couple of years ago, I used a different technique, but it turns out not to be as accurate, and Facebook has revised how it does things to make my old technique harder to use anyway.)
First of all, if a girl likes you and sees you as a prospect, she will accept a friends request from you. If she refuses, you’re either dead meat, or she doesn’t really know you well enough. And if she unfriends you, you’re definitely dead meat. (Sending a girl a friends request isn’t beta any more than getting a girl’s number is; as with any other situation in nature, the man propositions the woman.)
Now, if you’re Facebook friends, here’s where things get interesting.
Go to the Events menu, click on a “Maybe” button for an event (doesn’t matter if you really intend to go or not), then on the “Invite Friends” button that appears. Unfortunately, for you betas, this won’t be accurate unless you make an assiduous effort to not stalk girls. I have since coming here, which is why it works for me now.
Over the course of weeks and months, however, once you do stop, the girls that you have been stalking but who don’t stalk you will sink down in the list. But if they are stalking you, they will float to the top. Also, if you’re Facebook friends with your siblings and relatives, they will float to the top as well, especially your siblings. Your relatives will typically be further down, but will be in a big mass together more or less, and if a given girl remains above the mass of your relatives, it would mean that she stalks your profile more than your relatives do, and is still a warm lead. Being at or near the top of your list, of course, is better.
Thus, not Facebook stalking girls at all will make the “Invite Friends” list for Events eventually give you a meter-read on which girls are most interested in you.
LikeLike
Stawp linking to MPC.
LikeLike
Also, with the upcoming “canonizations” of two “popes”, here’s an interesting bit about the “Divine Mercy” devotion:
http://traditioninaction.org/HotTopics/f072_DivMercy.htm
The writer is bothered by it, but actually I’ll tell you why: the traditional Catholic Church is alpha, and the Novus Ordo is beta; likewise, the Sacret Heart devotion is alpha, and the condemned Divine Mercy devotion is beta.
LikeLike
Tolerance is the threshold total distance deviated from functionality before everything goes to shit. -says every mechanic.
LikeLike
Guffaw. Good one.
LikeLike
Racism is the most powerful form of collectivism.
LikeLike
It’s called “racial solidarity” there negro. Big white man words stump you again? Keep readin’ them books son. You’ll learn some day.
LikeLike
yes, thwack. we know this is all you can be. run along now, Massa is calling.
LikeLike
Theodore Logan
It’s called “racial solidarity”
——————————————————————–
Yeah, and communism is called “economic solidarity?”
Please bring back Greg Eliot because you guys are intellectual lightweights.
I might have to retire if y’all can’t get some better white talent up in here.
(((shakin my head)))
LikeLike
lmao. Oh you silly, room–temperature-IQ negroids. Suddenly, when faced with whitey banding together then “racial solidarity” is something bad But when darkie does it, its ok.
You monkeys can’t even get your hypocrisy hidden well.
Race rape!
LikeLike
when faced with whitey banding together then “racial solidarity” is something bad
——————————————————————————————–
Banding together to do what?
hang me from a tree?
instal me as an app inside your skulls?
LikeLike
You sound like a neocon Jew.
Your inner hymie needs to be busted.
LikeLike
Blacks vote as a bloc in American politics. God forbid whites voted in a way that reflected their own racial interests. Instead whites vote for abstract propositions.
When that indulgent white addiction to universalist and ethical principles ends: run mah niggah! Run!
LikeLike
Racism is powerful because it works, it makes economic sense. Why mix with those who are unlikely to pull their weight economically?
Whereas the usual implication of “collectivism” is one where you don’t have a choice about who you depend on, and everyone just gives up and works inefficiently and survives on the economy’s meager productivity.
LikeLike
You sound like a neocon Jew.
Your inner hymie needs to be busted.
lollzozlozlzz
LikeLike
Protocol I:
“Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll- parrots who, from all sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the GOYIM, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractedness; did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities.”
YKWs on the “equality” they push for the rest of us.
LikeLike
Poll Parrots.
I prefer to call them Blood Soaked Poppinjays.
LikeLike
Actually they are polls, polls and studies you have bombarded with every single day, they tell you what majority thinks, what you should think
So nothing left of true freedom of an individual against an inherent stupidity of the mob
The idea is quite simple; to kill a very notion of the elite of an society, the true elite capable of thinking for itself and acting on best interest of the nation and civilization they belong to
In 2 years from know they will ask you with whom of the presidential candidates you would most like to have beer with
And than you will see these despicable lairs going into bars to have one with the average Joe. “That is the real democracy”, Joe will proclaim almost in the tears of joy
Circus goes on, you may try to enjoy yourself if you only could
LikeLike
No one here seems to “get it?”
White liberals and white racists do NOT disagree on the goal of white supremacy; the disagreement is all about the PATH.
There is strong evidence the unsophisticated practice of racism (overt) is the weaker strategy and doomed to failure.
Bulls on the hill:
Bull #1 — “How bout we run down the hill and fuck that cow?”
Bull #2 — “How bout we walk down the hill and fuck ALL them cows?”
Racist white people are bull #1
LikeLike
what is dat? Massa be calling?
LikeLike
Aw gee shucks. A Swahili just so story?
LikeLike
shouldn’t you be upgrading your game?
LikeLike
no need to upgrade against you porch monkeys, since you never get any better than the trash you are.
LikeLike
lol. White libs as racist agains kneegroes, lol. Only a truly paranoic darkie could come up with that one. Tim Wise has schooled you well, boy, NEVER to stop playing that race card.
Liar rape!
LikeLike
Im going to produce a board game called “White supremacy”. It will be like the game “Monopoly” except when you roll the dice, you move around the board and try to hang the nonwhite pieces from trees (starting with the darkest pieces first).
When all the nonwhite pieces are hung, the white pieces then try to hang each other.
The last white piece left then declares WHITE SUPREMACY!
and hangs himself.
The End.
LikeLike
lol. As usual, a darkie thinks its darkie v. whities, when really, it’s non-blacks v. blacks.
Or, more correctly, it’s humans v. subhumans
thwackie rape!
LikeLike
Wogs are a crack up.
LikeLike
The sad part of Thwacks world is that he thinks hanging people was some sort of sadistic game.
Generally speaking stretching the neck of a dependable field hand would have been anathema
to a planter. No owner would have allowed an overseer or random YT to hang a reasonably well behaved black.
Lynching was for violent recidivists who couldn’t quite get convicted in court either through intimidation or lack of testimony. 2/3 were black 1/3 white in the entire history of lynching.
This doesn’t even address the use of capital crime in Europe in a comparable period. Hanging was metered out to serious criminals with a known record for killing and rape.
It’s a shame that the blacks live in an alternative universe with psychotic white men ready to string em up for sneezing. If the current clusterfuck of going easy on the negro is anything to go by I’d say blacks must have had it easy. They multiplied from 500,000 imported farm units in 45,000,000 shiftless scumbags.
LikeLike
I’m going to produce a board game called “Civil Rights”. It will be like the game “Monopoly” except when you roll the dice, you move around the board and try to hang the White pieces from trees (starting with the whitest pieces first).
When all the white pieces are hung, the liberal pieces then try to hang “white Hispanics” like George Zimmerman.
LikeLike
“…but only if Piggy approves,” PA said, under his breath.
False ally rape!
LikeLike
Lookee here, the neocon rat is twitching its whiskers. Tell everyone here boy, how you support Karl Rover’s open borders.
LikeLike
lmao. Poor wittle Piggy cocksucker. Looks like Piggy’s unleashed his servant to avenge the truth being told about Piggy!
LikeLike
Don’t try to change the subject, nation wrecker. Admit how you masturbate to Wall Street Journal’s proposed amendment “There shall be open borders.”
LikeLike
gotta go with Zombie on this one: thwack is amusing,he seemed like a real unusual negro,so that was kind of interesting;but it seems he really isnt a negro,he’s a jew. a dirty little jew who is not so interesting…
LikeLike
Perhaps your bull story is more enlightening than it seems at first glance
Perhaps bull # 2 is a nigger with no aesthetic taste, no ability or desire to discern,wanting to put it in every single hole including the sewer one
If bull #2 is not black than it is most definitely Bill CLITon
LikeLike
Thanks for MPC link. So refreshingly, unabashedly mind-speaking!!
Really a great read.
LikeLike
If you are not reading MPC posts and lifting on the regular, are you really, truly alive?
LikeLike
What exactly is so good about the weirdos over there making strawmen about libertarianism?
LikeLike
Good on the bashing white bashing front, and good on the no sugarcoating. If UR stomach ain’t strong enough to withstand MPC, eat boiled vegetables then. CH too, pulls some punches, slightly, but that helps with drawing in folks close to the divide to the more righteous form of thinking.
LikeLike
Libertarianism is bullshit. Go suck a billionaire’s dick and call it ” Going Gault”.
LikeLike
“Libertarianism is bullshit. Go suck a billionaire’s dick and call it ” Going Gault”.”
Not taking billionaires money away is going Galt?
Billionaires like big government you fool. The super rich prefer the republicrats. That’s why they’re the only parties electable. If Libertarianism and small government actually helped billionaires, you’d see more of them opposing blatant statists.
LikeLike
Tolerance is the last virtue of a dying society –Aristotle
LikeLike
makes sense
LikeLike
Darkness in entertainment is all about White women getting their rocks off to various bad boys, vampires, sadistic billionaires, in Marvel’s Agents of Whedon: “Evul! Hawt! Murdering Secret Agents she can CHANGE with her magic lady parts.” That’s all it is. Women seeking every greater dominance from ever greater bad boys as Estrogen in the water supply from Birth Control pills produces ever greater manginas (Credit: WF Price).
As for “White Privilege” math and science are the only proven path to power. Two plus Two equals four for any race. Said race just has to be smart and cooperative enough to use math and science. Nukes beats shaking your spears and having lots of kids as the coming China vs. Africa struggle for resources in the Dark Continent will prove. Africa has on its side voodoo, belief in magic, and lots of child soldiers plus Ebola and AIDS. China has nukes and modern aircraft. Guess who will run Africa?
And yes modern Shit-lib stuff is built on lies. Lies about Black people: that they are all “noble and good and oh so smart without being nerdy and icky and unsexy like that beta male engineer in the cubicle across from me!” Lies about Diversity, it IS being beaten to death with your own tire iron if you are unlucky enough to get a flat in the wrong neighborhood. Lies about the Wall, hypergamy, about men and women, about military force, an armed populace, almost everything.
Its built on lies because modern SWPL literally cannot handle the truth. They can’t handle it because Diversity and PC are built upon a Peacocking Strategy of “my status is so high I can handicap myself by surrounding myself with the Third World” while screwing over strategic competitors (other White guys without money, power, and connections). The entire SWPL culture is built upon anti-White views centered around peacocking.
LikeLike
OT: NBA team owner Donald Sterling pays the price for choosing a mudshark Mexican girlfriend. She records him saying “insensitive” things about black people in a private conversation, and all hell breaks loose.
http://www.tmz.com/2014/04/26/donald-sterling-clippers-owner-black-people-racist-audio-magic-johnson/
LikeLike
“Sterling” is not his real name. Tokowitz is. He went the route of so many of his fellow tribesman and changed his Jew name to better hide his jewness in the population. The fact that Sterling is a YKW makes this story all the more ironic. The NBA (led by commissioner Adam Silver, another YKW) will do everything they can to sweep this under the rug.
LikeLike
Sweep what under the rug? He did nothing wrong. And he should dump the bitch.
LikeLike
What do a fat white guy married to a black lesbian, a Jewish lawyer, a hispanic judge, 5 negro & 1 hispanic gang raping, attempted murderers have in common? They are a celebration of diversity that is leading to multimillion dollar paydays for the Central Park 5 who brutalized a white woman in 1989, got set free despite confessing to the crime, and now are suing for $50 million each… and have a sympathetic PBS documentary made about them.
LikeLike
in honor of this comment I will drink till I pass the fuck out or try anyway no promises
LikeLike
hopefully I don’t wake up tied up with superman cape on
girl and her mom going with me what could go wrong
LikeLike
Liberal white men are pussies. It’s that simple.
LikeLike
True. I’m a spic and I notice this about them. Bunch of low testosterone weak chinned feminine white pussies. I respect real white men. Sure their racist, but they have honor, ethics, merit. They stand up for what they believe in. Fuck white liberals and all liberals now that I think of it.
LikeLike
“The tolerance that liberals and libertarians demand is really a form of anesthesia–dulling the social nerves to threats. They want you to go through life numb and indifferent.”
Unless your anxiety was provoked by a creepy white male.
LikeLike
can’t even get a fucking taxi in my town cause of diversity thanks tolerance
LikeLike
pretty soon no buses or mail have to go post office to pick it up or some shit
LikeLike
yet my city got a sign that says zero tolerance i’m totally fucking confused
LikeLike
This is true, because the tolerance leftists ask for is impossible save for willful ignorance. Any time you override natural feelings, unless it’s because you have increased knowledge on a subject and therefore know better, you are merely repressing something, usually for social status. When you repress and ignore feelings you dull the feelings altogether, and lose the ability to feel them, and when we mess with mother nature it’s always a negative. In the end, many liberals recognize this, which is why they accidentally spout “racist” comments. Many liberals don’t even have the willpower to repress their instincts and wisdom gained from life experiences. I’ll never tolerate the intolerable. I don’t ever believe in fully retreating from the world, but I do retreat more and more into the conservative Church, where my true friends are, where I can express myself freely. It is much better than putting up facades of tolerance.
LikeLike
Reconciling libertarianism with immigration restriction is easy if you accept Europeans are most adapted to thrive in an individualistic policy environment.
Northern Euro nationalists – UKIP, Geert Wilders, the Norwegian Progress Party, Belgium’s Vlaams Belang, the Danish People’s Party – do it all the time. They’re economically libertarian by European standards and oppose immigration on grounds they aren’t suitable for modern civilization due to their demands for welfare handouts, criminality, and intolerance of differences in opinion.
LikeLike
Regarding the Sterling controversy.
1- Listening to the tape Sterling sounds more like a jealous boyfriend than a racist. He is upset his young trophy is hanging w/ another man and posting photos. By the fact that he is dating this mixed race woman he is demonstrating his lack of aversion to dark skinned people. It’s simply that men might accept a woman from another group but those same men reject and or fear men from that other group. No mystery here.
2- this also proves just how stupid women are. Truth is this woman was Sterling’s sex toy. He’s a rich old man and she’s a much younger, woman from a different culture ( they have nothing in common w/ each other so the attraction is obvious. She’s young and good looking He’s rich and rich).
Yet this absolute dope would antagonize her meal ticket. Why? simply b/c she is stupid and wants to prove a point or win the argument.
LikeLike
By the fact that he is dating this mixed race woman he is demonstrating his lack of aversion to dark skinned people
——————————————————————————————–
Maybe.
When an old white man dates a much younger dark woman its a way for him to telegraph to all around that his dick still works REAL GOOD.
LikeLike
naaa it means he is not racist and he gets free pass on the racist shit he does
what planet you from
he he he
LikeLike
So darker skinned women date a guy simply based on whether he has a functional dick? Those are pretty low standards. You have just unwittingly pointed out the ill-chosen selection criteria darker skinned women use to determine who they will spread their dark wings for.
LikeLike
reading comprehension is not your forte
LikeLike
They don’t demand tolerance, they demand acceptance. Unacceptance is unacceptable.
They’re actually the most intolerant group of folks on earth.
LikeLike
[…] I’m a simpleton and, as such, have not much idea what tolerance is (in the political use of the word). You see, I was reading Heartiste’s Comment of the Week: […]
LikeLike
Terry Kath holds quarter note for 40 seconds and gets away with it.
Hendrix listens and takes notes:
LikeLike