• Home
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • About

Chateau Heartiste

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Spot The Beta Male
Reader Mailbag: Toddler Game Vs EatPraySlut »

Go-Topless Day

August 26, 2014 by CH

There was a “Go-Topless Day” in NY this past Sunday. Two hundred (mostly) women and four hundred boobs marched in protest of those wrong kinds of white people in those horribly backward flyover states who force women to wear burqas over their nipples when out in public.

Hey I am all for women — but only cute women — having the freedom to display their naked bodies in public, as long as those women accept that men have the freedom to leer at their naked bodies and Instagram photos of their titties for Dad back home. But I’m thinking these weirdo cult feminists wouldn’t be down with that part of the individual freedom deal. Equal rights, yo.

Always with these slut parades there are mixed in with the occasional cuties an insane asylum of grotesqueries and/or subversives who provide fodder for normal people to point and jeer. This time it was a couple of men with huge, pendulous manboobs demanding the right to swing their milktits in little Johnny’s face. At least, I think they’re men, but who can tell for sure. Freaks have a knack for looking like they’re stuck in the pupal stage morphing from one species to another.

There’s one manboob, all the way to the right.

Here he is with his buddy, in a clearer shot.

Let your manboobs out, freedom fighter! Why weren’t their nips pixelated? Two dirigibles sporting flapjack mammaries is less offensive to the taste than female boobs? If the goal here is to uphold norms of journalistic conduct, these two gelatinous blobs should’ve been blurred head to toe.

“Slut pride” is synonymous with “civilization perishing”. By the time your culture gets to the point where women are proud for doing something that their grandmothers were proud of NOT doing, you should have your post-collapse plans squared away.

Share this:

  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Culture, Current Events, Feminist Idiocy, Funny/Lolblogs | 70 Comments

70 Responses

  1. on August 26, 2014 at 10:10 am David

    First?
    Boobs

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 3:38 pm trav777

      this country is doomed- stick a fork in it.

      “equal topless rights”!??!? Is this mfin insanity or am I in bizarre world? These SAME women…they gonna advocate for coed restrooms? How about equal sentencing for criminal offenders? Or maybe the “sexism” and “female privilege” inherent in that 90% of prisoners are male?

      I like tits as much as the next guy but women have inherently NO self-control

      LikeLike


  2. on August 26, 2014 at 10:10 am Go-Topless Day | Manosphere.com

    […] Go-Topless Day […]

    LikeLike


  3. on August 26, 2014 at 10:11 am yeahokcool

    that redhead is pretty hot

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 10:16 am furiousferrett

      Agreed. Probably just there because she’s even hotter when she stands next to an army of warpigs. It’s attention whore tactic #52.

      See hot gamer/nerd girls for more examples of this.

      LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 4:24 pm Doug

      Yep. The topless movement attracts 2 types: beautiful women who seem to want to show off their pert, supple breasts… and whales who happen to walk on their hind legs, far away from the sea.

      LikeLike


    • on August 27, 2014 at 8:52 am the soft brute

      also noticed.

      LikeLike


  4. on August 26, 2014 at 10:15 am PA

    When did the Panzer-bra become the default young womens undergarment? A few decades ago pretty women more freely shared their erogenous beauty: braless seethru, bouncy, pokies, peekaboo, and other ways.

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 10:26 am CH

      ironic that the sluttier women get (or purport to get), the less erotic they become.

      LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 10:30 am Zombie Shane

        The chick with the orange hair almost certainly has fake tits [this is NYC, remember]. And completely off topic, but Rick Perry just did a 180-degree about-face and went HARD BETA:

        Steve Schmidt joins Rick Perry’s legal team http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3197191/posts

        LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 10:36 am Zombie Shane

        Speaking of chicks with orange hair and perky tits, is it safe to assume that porn actress Faye Reagan has fake tits? If so, then plastic surgery has gotten a whole lot better than it used to be:

        https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=Faye+Reagan

        LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 12:03 pm Days of Broken Arrows

        Why can’t I reply directly to Zombie Shane? Anyway, there is a Web site called Boobpedia that tells you whether actresses or celebrities have fake boobs or not. Look it up.

        LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 3:37 pm The Karamazov Idea

        @Zombie Shane

        Confirmed. Surgery scar below breast fold on your left. It might not be showing up in other photos due to blurring or photoshop. Also a rather prominent Star of David. Oi Vey. Como se dice, “/pol/ was right again,” en espanol?

        Warning: EXTREME NSFW link. Nips on display.

        http://www.wwtdd.com/2014/08/rachel-jessee-goes-topless-because-its-fucking-go-topless-day/rachel-jessee-leads-the-international-go-topless-day-march-at-bryant-park-04/

        This girl seems to also have been at topless DC last year except with curly hair. The spokeswoman of another pointless feminist oppressionthon is a good looking vegas model SWPL girl who deferred to patriarchal beauty standards by getting her rack upgraded. Tears of laughter, tears of sorrow.

        http://www.examiner.com/article/rachel-jesse-leads-go-topless-rally-washington-dc

        LikeLike


      • on August 27, 2014 at 6:40 am Zombie Shane

        Karamazov – outstanding find with the WWTDD link – very visible surgery scar and SoD medallion around her neck.

        Tells you everything you need to know right there.

        LikeLike


      • on August 27, 2014 at 6:48 am Zombie Shane

        Okay, Broken Arrows, Boobpedia says that Kaye Reagan’s tits are real. And if that’s true – if they really are really real – then they are [or were] about as perfect a perfection as tits are capable of achieving:

        NSFW ***** http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Faye_Reagan ***** NSFW

        LikeLike


      • on August 27, 2014 at 6:51 am Zombie Shane

        > “SWPL girl ”

        SJPL?

        LikeLike


  5. on August 26, 2014 at 10:15 am Opus

    At least New York did not – does not – have to endure The Notting Hill Carnival where vibrant people annually stab each other despite the presence of seven thousand police officers.

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 3:41 pm trav777

      that’s because of lack of “opportunity” and “access” and because of “white privilege.” And because they are “plagued” or “besieged” by The Violence.

      LikeLike


  6. on August 26, 2014 at 10:21 am SatyrWolf

    I promise the excitement would be much less if the publicity shots contained the women that you will see publicly topless in America on any other day.

    It would be similar to People of Walmart, with more dry heaving.

    LikeLike


  7. on August 26, 2014 at 10:28 am passionman

    Go here…picture 4 and 6.

    http://nypost.com/2014/08/25/go-topless-day-the-best-sunday-ever-in-nyc/

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 10:32 am CH

      WB the redhead and the brunette with paper hearts over her nips. In public. Because it’s more equal that way.

      LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 3:20 pm The Karamazov Idea

        I had the same thought. Is it any coincidence that the feminists handed off the banner (literally, during a portion of the march at least) to the most attractive woman dumb enough to take up their cause? Of course not. It’s just good marketing. The redhead is gorgeous, but no man with any sense or self-worth (the two seem to go hand-in-hand) would ever be publicly associated with her in any official capacity. As the fatties get more unfuckable, the beautiful women get more unmarriageable.

        LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 3:43 pm trav777

      what a bunch of attention whore losers

      LikeLike


  8. on August 26, 2014 at 10:35 am Nepal

    The sad part is that they don’t realize that no one is impressed.

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 10:59 am MZ

      Agreed. I’m mostly disgusted but in a way it’s kind of sad that they think something like this is meaningful or adds purpose to their lives.

      LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 3:44 pm trav777

        but wait…they have vaginas, therefore every single brainfart or transient emotion they have is something the entire universe revolves around.

        LikeLike


      • on August 27, 2014 at 5:02 am haunted trilobite

        their brainqueefs are pretty significant too.

        LikeLike


  9. on August 26, 2014 at 10:46 am kfg

    While this is perfectly legal in NYS (tested up to the Supreme Court), what do you suppose the reactions of these very same women would be if men in NY started approaching women and saying, “Come on, baby, show us some tits”?

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 1:57 pm The Other Jim

      You notice how they’re not going be strolling in front of the local mosque while topless? Yeah, I didn’t think so either…

      Here’s the other thing that I noticed with these women at the Chicago Slutwalk & from the photo’s above. That at one point in their lives they had the choice to look feminine and pretty or ugly themselves up and they chose the latter. Look at the way they’ve chosen to make themselves unattractive (and I’m not talking about the fat chicks in the crowd); Tattoos, dyed hair, bad hairs styles eg bangs covering their foreheads(really unattractive IMO), big dark rimmed eyeglasses, sloppy, slovenly clothes, no makeup, no jewelry, no perfume, no high heels or stockings, etc. None of the tools that women used to use to attract a mate are present in any cohesive form. All of it is a outright rejection of conventional standards of beauty and femininity and the real power that goes along with that. They’re not only not trying, they’re rejecting the concept altogether.

      It’s quite telling and damning. There’s quite a bit of self-loathing and hatred going on inside of each of these women.

      LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 3:45 pm trav777

      I bet a lot of these women would protest against being paid to show, aka stripclubs

      LikeLike


  10. on August 26, 2014 at 10:54 am The Burninator

    It is not illegal for women to go topless in central Ohio (in fact, I believe across the state, generally). The only women I have seen topless in public have either been at the beach (where you’d expect to see it I suppose), at the local “Community Fest” where you do find the uglies in droves flaunting their sweaty, oily mounds (pretty women not welcomed, btw) in support of socialism, or out in front of the latest hard opening of a strip club, passing out fliers. The women who do the non-community festival flaunting are generally highly desirable looking otherwise, and the reaction here is typical; the fat, ugly monstrosities bitch and moan about it and declare how degrading it is, blah blah blah (unless you are ugly and do it for Marxism). The very same kind of grotesque females featured in this march, as a matter of fact.

    Point being, I doubt that three weeks ago few to any of these women gave two shits about going topless in public. But the command came down from on high and the hivemind engaged and now suddenly they all want to take off their shirts. Let the law change in NY and I guarantee you that will be probably the last time you see women topless in public, and within a year these same beasts will be shouting at the few pretty women who take off the shirt in public as somehow supporting the “patriarchy” and feeding the lewd desires of men. They don’t care about this “right”, they simply are bored, pampered, shameless cunts in search of some kind of meaning in life who latch onto the first cause that they are convinced “empowers” them.

    As P.J. O’Rourke mindfully noted in the 1990’s, we’ve become a Tyranny of Boredom.

    LikeLike


  11. on August 26, 2014 at 11:17 am ng85

    I live in NYC, and I remember a year or 2 ago there was all this news about how it’s now legal for women to walk around topless…..Yet I’ve never seen a topless woman on the streets on the city.

    So a few thoughts:

    1) This “topless freedom” shit reminds me of women who demand the right to be able to serve on the front lines in times of war. But since they’ve been allowed this freedom none of them have embraced it or exercised it.

    2) Slutwalks, the Mermaid Parade, and now this topless protest thing are the domain of ugly attention whores. No one wants to see these fuggos as sexual beings, so these chicks have to go out of their way to slut themselves up and then be loud and obnoxious to even get male attention (Also, notice how it’s only ugly chicks who complain about “street harassment”? Something tells me they make it all up to make it sound like they’re hotter than they really are. I wouldn’t even notice most of them on the street, much less feel the urge to holla at them).

    3) The redhead in the red skirt close to the far right in the first photo is fucking cute. And she knows it. Slender toned body, perfect tits. And look at that hand on her hip and that smirk on her face. She’s a 20/10 in that crowd of uglies and she can’t get enough of it. She’s the only fuckable girl in either of those photos, and that’s saying a lot in a city filled with models and actresses and trophy girlfriends/wives.

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 11:29 am kfg

      “Slender toned body . . .”

      Nor particularly. She is, however, rather Classical.

      LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 11:35 am Adamn

        downright tubby with silicone parts

        LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 11:42 am PA

        Also very pointy elbows.

        LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 12:12 pm ng85

        Well you guys bring up a point I was wondering about when I made that post. Is that redhead legitimately hot, or is her SMV increased by the simple fact that she’s surrounded by lard-asses? After all, an average girl will comparatively seem like a 10 in a crowd of Andrea Dworkin look-a-likes.

        LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 2:22 pm Anonymous

        “Is that redhead legitimately hot, or is her SMV increased by the simple fact that she’s surrounded by lard-asses?”

        Yes.

        While I avered that she was not particularly slender and toned, neither did I cast any aspersions on the Classical figure. Aphrodite is a bit squishy about the limbs, but she shows abs.

        LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 12:00 pm yeahokcool

      her knees are also too sharp

      LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 2:01 pm The Other Jim

      The redhead is attractive, but as mentioned elsewhere in this thread she’s a actress which means she’s certifiably nuts, and yes, I’ve found this out the hard way. As Rex Harrison once said, ‘Never marry an actress, they never stop acting…”

      It’s true of all women, but with women in the entertainment industry it’s of an order of magnitude worse.

      LikeLike


    • on August 27, 2014 at 5:11 am haunted trilobite

      It’s hardly filled with through creme de la creme like you say. ‘filled with a lot of unsightly women’ that make way for the occasional rate beauty might be more accurate. maybe I was just hanging out in the wrong parts.

      LikeLike


  12. on August 26, 2014 at 11:17 am Laguna Beach Fogey

    This kind of stuff is neither erotic nor impressive.

    :::yawn:::

    At this point it’s about as exciting as seeing a pair of African boobs in an old National Geographic.

    Funny, though, how femcunts and other progs are always reduced to acting out in the most infantile, petty, primitive ways possible.

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 11:34 am Opus

      Funny thing about National Geographic and those topless Zulus – I could never get a hard on.

      LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 3:46 pm trav777

        that’s because you beez rayciss

        LikeLike


      • on August 28, 2014 at 11:28 am Burton

        Funny, though, how femcunts and other progs are always reduced to acting out in the most infantile, petty, primitive ways possible.

        i.e., typical unrestrained female behavior. This is why patriarchy is needed to ensure civilization.

        LikeLike


  13. on August 26, 2014 at 11:43 am Canadian Friend

    It only makes women look even more stupid than we already know they are.

    LikeLike


  14. on August 26, 2014 at 11:52 am Death Rattle

    the whole country is a gathering of the juggalos now.

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 1:58 pm AryanAbduction

      Well done sir

      LikeLike


  15. on August 26, 2014 at 11:59 am Zodak

    are those 2 fat guys doing it to point out how absurd it is? or are they such fat losers, that’s it’s the only way they can be near topless girls?

    LikeLike


  16. on August 26, 2014 at 12:37 pm Sentient

    The red head is Rachel Jessee, a lunatic illusionist magician attention whore (stage name “Scarlet”) who plead guilty to the battery of her mentor, and older male, in 2010. With pics!

    http://www.insidemagic.com/magicnews/2010/04/scarlett-pleads-no-contest-to-attack-on-mentor/

    As Mr. Weatherford notes, Ms. Jessee’s story serves as a “cautionary tale of a show business dream.” The dream was shared between Ms. Jessee and her mentor and manager John Lewis.

    In the end, Mr. Lewis claims he spent nearly a million dollars, lost his prized antique car collection, left his wife of 41 years, and subject to Ms. Jessee’s physical abuse.

    It is also a story of domestic violence and — if Lewis had his choice in the legal system — elder abuse.Mr. Lewis has reconciled with his wife, Carolyn and together they filed a breach of contract suit against Ms. Jessee alleging “repeated physical abuse and financial improprieties in converting Carolyn Lewis’ assets without her consent.”

    Mr. Lewis told the columnist, “It’s hard to believe that when you see her onstage, but she would just, like, turn into ‘The Exorcist,’ ” he says. “She’s got a terrible violent temper that just explodes. It’s hard to explain, because she looks small. But she’s extremely strong when she gets mad.”

    LikeLike


  17. on August 26, 2014 at 12:47 pm Sentient

    and older dude’s – Lewis was 67 when he was beaten by the 21 YO Jessee, so they met when she was 19 or 20 and he was 65 or 66…. hehehe

    http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/ex-manager-sues-entertainer-claiming-coercion

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 12:54 pm CH

      a 65yo man will still be able to overpower a 21 yo woman. a lot of times when you hear about these stories of F->M domestic assault, the man just stood there and took the beating from the woman, rightly assuming that retaliating in any way would either hurt her too much or bring down the law on him.

      LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 12:58 pm Sentinet

        Yes obviously he was a pussy, who else would spend $1M promoting his baby doll, who was one step above a stripper…

        LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 1:13 pm Sentinet

        But he was a 65+ dude bangin a hot 19 YO… Fame Game for the win… to bad he betafied in such an epic way…

        LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 1:30 pm Canadian Friend

        Ain’t it weird that a society where it is generally accepted or tolerated that a woman physically assaults a man is called a patriarchy?

        Ain’t it weird that a society where men are not allowed to defend themselves from physical assault by women is called a patriarchy?

        Ain’t it weird that a society where men are thrown in jail for simply defending themselves from a physical assault by a woman is called a patriarchy?

        Ain’t it weird that a society where even if it is the man who calls the cops to ask them to come stop his wife from assaulting him, even if he is bleeding and the wife is not, it is the man who the cops take to the police station to spend the night is called a patriarchy?

        Ain’t it weird that a society where a woman cuts off the penis of a man other women are allowed to congratulate her publicly on tv and in articles published everywhere is called a patriarchy?

        LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 3:51 pm trav777

        the real truth about DV inequality is that women initiate physical attacks on men as frequently as the reverse, in some studies, slightly more often. Men just hit harder. He was right. I know a jacked black guy like 220, 230 and he just went into the bathroom and called po-po when his crazy white gf busted a vase over his head. You’ve got no choice these days, the system is so women-first that it makes anyone’s accusation of “patriarchy” so absurdly laughable as to be a farce.

        LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 1:16 pm Sentinet

      She does have the crazy eye thing…

      funny – http://celebrity.wikia.com/wiki/Scarlett,_Princess_of_Magic

      a father weeps in the distance…

      LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 4:26 pm corvinus

        It’s funny how she looks hot in this pic, but not up close in her mug shot, shown above.

        LikeLike


      • on August 26, 2014 at 4:33 pm kfg

        And even in this publicity shot:

        LikeLike


  18. on August 26, 2014 at 1:57 pm MN

    Militantly Nude

    Some of you may also register a whiff of disingenuousness in exhibitionists accusing their critics of being repressive and stuffy. Exhibitionists may be eager to dispense with clothing in incongruous locations – say, a traffic island in the middle of a busy intersection – but they desperately need an audience, preferably a clothed one, and preferably one that’s embarrassed, inconvenienced and unwilling. San Francisco is remarkably well-equipped in terms of nude-friendly laws, clubs and amenities, including a nude beach and nearby nudist colonies. As Zombie notes, what’s revealing is that such venues weren’t deemed sufficient for our wrinkly radicals:

    These protesters and urban nudists don’t simply want to be naked in private or be naked around other naked people; they want to be naked around clothed people. Because that’s where the sexual thrill originates; violating a taboo. Being naked where nakedness is normal doesn’t count; eliciting shock or interest from unwitting strangers is the whole point.

    LikeLike


  19. on August 26, 2014 at 2:11 pm Go-Topless Day | Reaction Times

    […] Source: Heartiste […]

    LikeLike


  20. on August 26, 2014 at 3:03 pm Joachim Peiper

    Going topless used to be common in much of Europe during the 80s and still is on beaches, but it has dropped off preciptously since then. The majority of women won’t go topless anymore whereas back in the day, most did, including those you didn’t want to.

    LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 3:30 pm wolfie65

      Ah yes…I remember the days when hyper-repressed U.S. college guys would ask me where the nude beach was. And their disappointment upon discovering that for every 1 topless 19-year old Swedish bikini model, there were 7 Italian families- mom, dad, 5 kids, 7 nephews & nieces, grandma, grandpa, uncles – also topless and/or Speedo-clad…….
      Not to mention the graying, balding German Hippies with beer/Granola bellies.
      No Speedos there…..

      LikeLike


    • on August 26, 2014 at 3:52 pm trav777

      yeah…the only good part of that was the teen girls doing it

      LikeLike


  21. on August 26, 2014 at 8:38 pm melmoth

    “She’s extremely strong when she gets mad,” he said. Meaning it was a common thing and not a one time surprise. So he was clearly getting off on being dominated by her, both physically and financially. He didn’t make the angry comment of a true beating victim. His comment is just a show of more awe/submission to a young female. My guess is that he was in a money slave, whipping boy fantasy land and it spun out of control. Much like females who call rape after being dumped, he called ‘abuse’ after being dumped, even though she was his long term dominatrix and he must have loved it. That’s my call.

    LikeLike


  22. on August 27, 2014 at 9:04 am ng85

    Here’s another thing I noticed while reading about this march: Most of the girls who aren’t utter pigs are wearing pasties over their nipples. Someone mentioned before that it seems to be the least sexy girls who are the biggest sluts, and I have a theory on that.

    For women, their power lies in their sexuality. If they have smoking hot bodies then, in theory, it takes more work to be able to see them naked. But an ugly or fat girl needs all the attention she can get, so there’s a higher chance it’ll be easier to get her naked. This is why a pig like Lena Dunham is constantly naked in the show “Girls”, but more attractive actresses like Jennifer Lawrence or Megan Fox have (To my knowledge) never done a nude scene.

    Long story short: It’s easy to give something away for free if it’s valueless.

    LikeLike


  23. on August 27, 2014 at 9:24 am Critical Eye

    Reminds me of Jerry Pournelle’s description of women at SF cons: half-pretty girls half-dressed to prove it.

    LikeLike


  24. on August 27, 2014 at 11:56 am herbling

    “talks with topless women at a protest”

    LikeLike


  25. on August 27, 2014 at 12:03 pm Anonymous

    The ykw redhead would get it hard. She’s also been prominently featured in other top less day articles as well. I believe there’s pics of her top less in front of the Whitehouse from last year. Serial attention whore.

    LikeLike


  26. on August 27, 2014 at 12:10 pm herbling

    Boyfriend Gets Pissed as I stare at his Girlfriends Boobs

    LikeLike


  27. on August 28, 2014 at 11:26 am Burton

    Reminds me of Jerry Pournelle’s description of women at SF cons: half-pretty girls half-dressed to prove it.

    I believe that was in his SF novel, “Inferno,” a satire on Dante’s work wherein a writer journeys through hell. It’s an interesting commentary that such females are the gateway to the infernal regions!

    LikeLike



Comments are closed.

  • Copyright © 2018. Chateau Heartiste. All rights reserved. Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • Pages

    • About
    • Alpha Assessment Submissions
    • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    • Dating Market Value Test For Men
    • Dating Market Value Test For Women
    • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    • Shit Cuckservatives Say
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
  • Twitter Updates

    Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

  • Recent Comments

    Captain John Charity… on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
    Tobin72 on Battlebrows As Portent Of Soci…
    Captain John Charity… on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
    CulturalResilience f… on The Three Abrahamic Religions,…
    Captain John Charity… on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
    Captain John Charity… on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
    Thor on The Three Abrahamic Religions,…
    Carlos Danger on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
    desertoakie on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
    Carlos Danger on Betrayal Is A Woman’s…
  • Top Posts

    • Battlebrows As Portent Of Sociopath America
    • Women's Sports Will Be Killed Off By Invasive Trannies
    • Red Tsunami?
    • Oy, There It Is
    • Betrayal Is A Woman's Heart
    • The Three Abrahamic Religions, Abbreviated
    • Shitlib Logic Trap!
    • Globohomo's Next Target: "Sexual Racism"
    • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon
    • There's Something [Very Special] About That Migrant Caravan Truck
  • Categories

  • Game

    • 60 Years of Challenge
    • Alpha Game
    • Cajun
    • Krauser PUA
    • Rational Male
    • Roosh V
    • Tenmagnet
    • Treatise of Love
  • MAGA MEN

    • Alternative Right
    • AmRen
    • Anonymous Conservative
    • Audacious Epigone
    • Dusk in Autumn
    • Education Realist
    • Evo and Proud
    • Gene Expression
    • Hail To You
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • Lion of the Blogosphere
    • My Posting Career
    • OneSTDV
    • PA World and Times
    • Page For Men
    • Parapundit
    • Rogue Health and Fitness
    • Steve Sailer
    • The Anti-Gnostic
    • The Kakistocracy
    • The Red Pill Review
    • The Spearhead
    • Unqualified Reservations
    • Vox Popoli
    • West Hunter
    • Whiskey's Place
  • Syllogism and Synthesis

    • Alias Clio
    • Arts & Letters Daily
    • Deconstructing Leftism
    • Elysium Revisited
    • Feminine Beauty
    • hbd chick
    • Human Biological Diversity
    • Library of Hate
    • Overcoming Bias
    • Stuff White People Like

WPThemes.


Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: